skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Attacks on US flagged ships are acts of war against the US, which you would think would cause hesitation on the part of the Houthi and Iran. And having more US-flagged ships helps the US maintain a logistic capability in the face of larger wars.
Also, there's AppArmor which is enabled in Debian and SuSE which transparently limits applications' reach without they realize.
Apple spent a huge amount of time and money getting Safari in line with PWA standards in the past few years. Your comment would make sense 3 years ago when it was completely unclear whether Apple will flinch.
The obvious answer here is that the drawing program did not require copyrighted material from Disney to be created.
> 1,750 warheads, per New START [1], on a few hundred missiles. That’s enough to wreak havoc. But given missile defense and offshore basing, reality for most of our adversaries, it leaves a lot of the enemy’s fighting capacity intact.

Even if that's the correct interpretation of the capabilities, it doesn't mean MAD can't be implemented. It just means it needs countervalue targets (cities and industry) vs only counterforce targets (military).
Would employees of their companies, who must do drug tests, be given the same leniency?
> nor did I expect them to be cheaper than the non-Super cards.

to be blunt, that's because you bought into ayymd propaganda. it is so endemic that people don't even see it for what it is anymore, people are constantly bombarded with absurdly pro-AMD and absurdly anti-NVIDIA takes, it's just the sea in which we swim on social media.

you should take it as a learning experience and not constantly buy into the ayymd bandwagon of the week next time. because there will absolutely be a next time - probably people will move onto the next insane thing within a few weeks here.

Last year it was that the 4090 was going to be >900W... people talked themselves into thinking that a two-node shrink was going to result in zero efficiency gain. This ada gen is a dud, just wait for AMD, the 7900XTX is gonna blow the doors off!

https://www.techpowerup.com/294261/nvidia-allegedly-testing-...

And it's happened to RDNA3, Vega, Fury X, Zen2, etc, and against every single technology deployed via RTX or DLSS. The flip on framegen the day AMD released FSR3 was amazing, and instantly all the complaints about latency etc vanished within a single day, despite being significantly worse latency because of forced vsync/incompatibility with VRR, let alone the reflex-only baseline. "Possibly the best part of FSR now" etc.

it's like the runup to the iraq war or something, there were counter-voices, but why would you want to listen to them when everybody knows the truth already? Going against the grain constantly is tiresome and frames you as an iconoclast, and even if you're right people still think you're a troublemaker for having contradicted them earlier. The people who blocked you are not gonna unblock you just because you were right. It's like trying to be the voice of reason in a failing project, even if you save the project you're still a troublemaker. So eventually the dialogue just fades into an echo chamber. It is a fast road to what was eulogized as "epistemic closure" - aka "we bandwagoned too hard and drowned out all the opposing voices, and it turns out they were correct".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemic_closure#Epistemic_cl...

So here we are: green man bad, everyone knows it, and this exception really only proves the rule. Now if you'll excuse me I've got some very important posts to make about how you'll never be able to buy one for MSRP anyway, like it's still 2020 or something.

In fairness you are not alone, fun reading from only a few days ago etc: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38804502
Same with both Firefox and Chrome on Android.
Some ideas are suitable for indie hacking, others need venture funding.

Surprisingly, the world went quickly from 2022, raising as much as possible, growing at all costs, to the belief that indie hacking is the only way.

I strongly encourage everyone to find customers for your idea, as I did for Quesma before starting to raise money. In the current environment, even for initial ideas, the bar is higher than it used to be.
It is reasonable that passengers know that the desires for the crew to have "idle chat" are less important than safety. But t0mas88 made clear that what is reasonable is less important than what is "accepted by the crew". The crew apparently makes the decisions on safety matters.
Unfortunately, feature detection indicates that Firefox on Android supports vibration, but it doesn't currently work.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653318
It used to be my favorite social media platform, but I quickly deactivated my account on Christmas and then deleted the app.

The major problem is that Threads will surface and even recommend (via your Facebook feed as well) threads that people you follow have responded to. Great in theory, but on Christmas Day I opened up FB to find it recommended this highly toxic anti-gay post in the middle of all my friends' posts about the holiday. It was because someone I follow on threads took the bait and commented on this post.

I've had far too many instances of this sort of behavior in my life and the only options available were to unfollow everyone, constantly block these abusive actors, or leave. For me, it was absolutely not worth staying, despite the up sides.
The measuring tool is accurate. The way it appears on your screen is always misleading in some way, because your screen is flat.
>I don't understand how the Houthis have support right now

They've got a huge amount of popular support in the Middle East, because so many people there hate Israel, and see the Houthis as the only ones standing up to Israel (apart from Hamas and Hezbollah). I don't have a source, but if you ever happened to check the comments on Middle East TikTok videos you'd see what I mean.
Back to Magellan times I see.
I absolutely have. And I've never modified a server to accept bullshit from an incorrect client. I have, on the other hand, told several people how to fix their clients when they complain it doesn't work with my service. I actually rather enjoy improving the ecosystem, even if it's not strictly my job. It's better for everyone.
Just a minor note that you don't need a 3rd-party http daemon since there is one in base.

https://man.openbsd.org/httpd
This is a wildly unserious argument.
LOL "there is no evidence of a conspiracy"
I still use reverse polish calculator (on my phone) but I'm not used typing it left to right but executed right to left.

For example in uiua:

* + 1 2 5

Pushes 5 on the stack, then pushed 2, then pushes 1. Then pops 1 and 2 adds them together and pushes 3, then pops 3 and 5 and multiplies then together

Reverse polish:

5 2 1 + *

EDIT: it does makes sense in the context of an array language
Why's that? He has been doing the commercials for around a couple of decades, staring long before he was the one doing the casting. Even after taking that role in 2016, the previous commenter points out that the commercials continued to be well received until well into the 2020s. It was a successful formula for a long time.

Indeed, positive audience sentiment has an expiration date. He rode the wave too long, perhaps, but it is hard to know when to stop. All ongoing media productions (e.g. TV shows) suffer from the same problem and question of when to keep going and when to move on.
reminds me of 1-button iphone that I never want to own
It's not a full solution, but there must be lists of good levels out there on the internet. I just found https://www.reddit.com/r/TraditionalMarioMaker/.

For me, couch multiplayer would make it 10x better. I bought the game and was sorely disappointed to see that this wasn't included.
Can you build Retool inside of Retool?
My story was illustrative, not exhaustive.
The Interconnect, Harvard Architecture, and Dual Port RAM
In the future, please consider that any actual human who chooses to spend a fraction of their finite time on Earth reading your words deserves to have that time spent reading something you actually wrote using your own effort and mind.

I read blogs to connect with people, not LLMs. I have far far better things to do with my life then waste it stumbling through mostly-meaningless machine-generated word vomit.

If you don't feel it's worth your time to write the sentences, why on Earth should I feel it's worth my time to read them?
I use random test generation constantly for compiler testing.
Good idea, but only once the transport mechanism doesn't involve a significant risk of explosion.
What's the most casual user-friendly distro of *BSD out there? GhostBSD?
> They allow an opt out for training

And given how buggy OpenAI is in general, can’t trust them to actually honor this opt-out, nor protect it from abuse (e.g. they scrape copied content). They’ll need a model like YouTube’s scrubber that either deletes content or monetizes it on behalf of the copyright owner. And since OpenAI is making lots of money here, yes there is a technically feasible path towards royalties. But sama thinks he’s cool af and e/sigma blah blah blah.

https://community.openai.com/t/chatgpt-occasionally-reuses-t...
Apparently he's going to write about Merkle CRDTs next, but if you can't wait:

https://www.dolthub.com/blog/2022-06-27-prolly-chunker/
Yes. Tons with server-side Blazor apps. We currently use Blazor for our internal admin UIs, but at this point I'd never put it in something customer facing (even in B2B setting).

We haven't played with the client-side WASM stuff, but the conclusion is that server-side blazor is not a fantastic technology if you want something that "just works". Websockets in particular are kind of nasty when you have a client device ecosystem where screens and apps are frequently changing activity state. Stateless forms are much easier to reason about. iOS/Safari is very aggressive with closing down unused resources. Stateless forms can survive for days on those user agents. Our blazor apps would require refreshes after a few minutes of inactivity.

Vanilla web forms & SSR is what we run with today. Our "framework" is to use string verbatim & interpolation operators in C# to compose our responses. Looks something like PHP and has zero dependencies.
Exactly. Downstream uses are the responsibility of the person using the content, not the engine that generated it.
yes, specially if you outperform your peers
The two aren't mutually exclusive.

* I agree that you often will want a server such as Caddy/nginx/Apache httpd to be the Internet-facing http server. They give you a lot of nice things like DoS resistance, logging, robust TLS implementations, and dispatch to all the various applications you might be running.

* But you need some protocol between that proxy and your application. Like debugnik, I'd prefer to just use HTTP as that protocol rather than something else like FastCGI. I already have to be familiar with HTTP/1.1 in the sense that I both actually know the wire format by heart and know of a huge variety of tools that can directly speak it. So I'd rather just have my application speak HTTP over a Unix or IP socket that my frontend webserver proxies to. "Each HTTP-serving lib is another liability" is at least as true for "each FastCGI-serving lib" given that the FastCGI libs will be obscure (less well-tested and maintained) and (due to poorer familiarity/tooling) harder to debug.
I think the problems you highlight are mostly orthogonal to CGI. You absolutely can use an in-memory cache with CGI. You could even use shared memory if you were so inclined.

Startup cost is potentially an issue, but the trick there is to make sure the CGI bits are tiny and can delegate heavy duty work to longer running processes. You don't have to execute the entire workflow within the CGI script.
Now that you mentioned it, its clear. However I didn't interpret originally it that way.
Emissions? Bad. Really really bad.
somewhat off-topic, but I want to share hyperfine[1], which is nearly purpose-built for measuring this kind of performance:

$ hyperfine --shell=none "node -e ''" "python -c pass" "perl -e ''" "php -r ''" "bash -c ''" "echo"
Benchmark 1: node -e ''
Time (mean ± σ): 87.3 ms ± 8.0 ms [User: 69.8 ms, System: 18.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 77.9 ms … 111.1 ms 31 runs

Benchmark 2: python -c pass
Time (mean ± σ): 24.4 ms ± 5.6 ms [User: 17.5 ms, System: 6.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 15.8 ms … 31.3 ms 97 runs

Benchmark 3: perl -e ''
Time (mean ± σ): 2.8 ms ± 0.6 ms [User: 0.9 ms, System: 1.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 1.7 ms … 3.9 ms 863 runs

Benchmark 4: php -r ''
Time (mean ± σ): 19.3 ms ± 4.2 ms [User: 8.9 ms, System: 10.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 12.1 ms … 24.8 ms 241 runs

Benchmark 5: bash -c ''
Time (mean ± σ): 4.9 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 2.8 ms, System: 1.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 2.6 ms … 6.4 ms 552 runs

Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet system without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.

Benchmark 6: echo
Time (mean ± σ): 1.2 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 0.7 ms, System: 0.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 0.8 ms … 2.1 ms 2237 runs

Summary
echo ran
2.41 ± 0.89 times faster than perl -e ''
4.17 ± 1.39 times faster than bash -c ''
16.37 ± 5.91 times faster than php -r ''
20.74 ± 7.64 times faster than python -c pass
74.21 ± 22.49 times faster than node -e ''

(tested with node 21.5.0, python 3.11.6, perl 5.38.1, php 8.2.14, and bash 5.2.21 on Ryzen 2700X)

[1]: https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine
But most modern IDEs (I know JetBrains and VSCode both do...) support editing on one machine with a remote backend that compiles and runs your code. What you're complaining about isn't much different, except for some technical details of how it is implemented.
I checked a sampling of a few games there and the only one where it's not ahead by a solid margin at 2560x1440 is Far Cry 6... the game that I gave up trying to play because it would not run smoothly on my 3090 + 5900X even with the settings turned down.
According to Wikipedia the SWEET16 Interpreter is significantly slower than native assembly (Wiki says 1/10th the speed). A C compiler that targets 6502 would make sense if I want to code something to run on the Apple ][ that's relatively performant
It's not just shipping costs and times, but also (and perhaps most importantly) shipping's total capacity. The same fleet of ships can now make substantially less trips, which means that substantially less goods will be transported between Europe and Asia. Perhaps rising costs of shipping on this route will divert some ships from other routes around the world here, but overall outcome across entire world has be to less maritime commerce, leading to increase in prices of goods.
If I'm understanding correctly, the post isn't calling TLS broken, it's calling out the bad behavior of browsers.

By employing mitigations/workarounds, they encourage misconfigured servers, and that in turn produces unexpected or inconsistent behaviors when interacting with those servers through different client types. eg you might see different behavior in FF vs Chrome, or Chrome vs curl/python, etc.
This is ignoring that there's profit driven enshittification replacing talent with overworked and cheap overseas workers. Increasingly higher salaries are being replaced by cheaper salaries, and the results show in quality.
https://archive.is/lRlQf
Bitcoin Halving Sparks Market Frenzy
Then their dark history would have been obvious.
Same with "not statistically insignificant". People think for two things to be at all related they must be "statistically significantly" related, but it's not true.
You don't have to use an interpreted language with CGI.
[Edit: Apparently I’m reviewing the wrong product; see replies.]

I tried the app version on one of my old repos. It’s a somewhat challenging test case because there are few comments and parts of the code are incomplete, though I’d say the naming convention is pretty good. The app suggested the question “What is the purpose of the ‘safemode-ui-hook.m’ file?” I accepted the suggestion, and the output was… completely wrong.

I’m not surprised it guessed the purpose wrong; even a human would need some context to understand what’s going on in that particular file, though of course the AI did worse by being confidently wrong rather than saying it didn’t know. But the AI also made specific claims that could be seen as wrong just by reading the file. It claimed the file “defines a SUBSTITUTE_safemodeUIHook C struct” when neither that struct name nor anything like it appears anywhere in the file. The name seems to just be mashed together from the repo name and file name.

Which makes me wonder, did the AI even see the content of the file? Is it pre-summarized somehow in a way that makes it know very little about the file? Or did the AI see it in full, but hallucinate anyway?
So fail at another trillion dollar forever war?
European navies can project force just fine, especially the Royal Navy, French Navy and the Italian Navy all of ehich have aircraft carriers.

By the way, military support for Ukraine runs just fine.

Main reason nobody goes to fight over this, is the avoidance of escalation. And so far, some delays in shipping is not the end of the world.
Yes, fair. Would you be willing to expand on why you feel Quesma requires funding to get started?

This seems like an extremely software-focused business that could have an MVP written by the technical founder while typically I'd expect hardware, deep science (self-driving to name one), etc to need to raise money for obvious reasons.

What is Quesma's planned offering that requires an initial team larger than 1 to be able to bring to market?
I just read my comment and realized how unfriendly it was, sorry about that. Thank you for not replying as rudely as I did.
Helicopter Use
Mario is one my favorite platforming series, but I felt that the Mario Maker games never quite reached the level of innovation of LittleBigPlanet. (Both in the tooling and the community.)

It looks like some users did the work to archive LittleBigPlanet, too:

https://archive.org/details/@littlebigarchive

Hopefully it's comprehensive.

People came up with all kinds of hacks to push the engine to its limits. They made FPS games, top down Zelda dungeons, and all kinds of crazy stuff with LBP. It was awesome.

I haven't checked out LBP's spiritual successor Dreams yet (I don't have time to game lately), but I've heard it's phenomenal.

That said, I do enjoy watching others try to clear some of the diabolically difficult levels that Mario Maker creators design.
Fake Views – The Contrast Between Renderings and Reality
Correction: His name is Jimmy Koppel, not Jeremy. My bad
Love the idea! I will try it on my own repo!

As an aside, I've been thinking of creating an auto-wiki for game lore based on what AI npcs say, i.e. convert their hallucinations into canon.

How was your experience of taking unstructured text (though code is more structured) and making it into wikis?

How difficult is to have it do incremental updates vs re-create it all?
> a joint after work or on the weekends ... but it quickly devolves from there.

That's generally disproven, and demonstrates ignorance on your part.

It doesn't matter what the addiction is: Cigarettes, alcohol, gambling, video games, TV, sex, work, money, religion: No government regulation can force a person to live a "good" life, and these kinds of addictions, legal or not, can have nasty negative consequences.

It just so happens that certain substances are illegal due to politics, bias, and ignorance. There's good reasons that these substances should be controlled, but how we (assuming you are in the US or country with similar laws) control them isn't working. (Banning them just creates dangerous black markets.)

When it comes to dangerous narcotics like opioids, cocaine, ect, the biggest obstacle to reform is misinformation like "a joint after work or on the weekends ... but it quickly devolves from there". That's not how addiction works; and continuing to believe and repeat misinformation like that perpetuates the problem. (IE, the misinformation makes it politically difficult in the US to to offer forms of treatment that are proven to work.)
Sorry for the confusing language choice on my part. I just meant that I think it's great that your project supports JMdict. I think how you are using JMdict is indeed totally okay! :^)
YES! The thermocouples are such a big deal. I have been using the Breville Control Freak cooktop ($1500, single 1800w burner) for years — this was the first device to include this feature.

Once you use temperature-controlled cooktops, you can't go back. You can set your garlic to saute and walk away.
What does that have to do with outputs?

If ingesting data is a fair use violation it doesn't matter what the model outputs. I was responding that is the responsibility of the program creator stop all fair use violations instigated by its users.
Attribution for these is difficult. Many non-state actors involved. Maybe the US can launch another failed war against a concept (terror, drugs, etc)
Yes, I didn't mention that but they have a rotating schedule of some of the most elite programmers you have ever heard. I will also say that array programming is very seductive if you have the "puzzle solving" mentality that a lot of us have. It seems so elegant. I have never found a legitimate use for it in my paying work, but I am captivated by it privately.
Yes, there's no practical limit to how far we can scale it. We would actually do that for free since it's open source. Do you want it?
Salmon are similarly on the road to extinction due to habitat loss, climate change and over fishing, along with the Resident Orcas that exclusively eat them.
Conventional military wisdom is that you cannot win a war from the air. Case in point: Vietnam. You have to put boots on the ground to secure the area and the Saudis aren't about to do that and the American people would never support dying for a Saudi war.
Wow - two of the links along the bottom of the Twitter/X home page are broken: the "About" and "Directory" links. Ironic, pathetic or both?

Pretty wild how sloppy
Where do you draw the line? Usually there's exactly 1 intended, standard way of communicating with another system while there's are infinite opportunities to deviate from that standard and infinite opportunities for the other party to try to guess what you really meant. This results in a combinatorial explosion unintended behaviors that lead to bugs and critical security vulnerabilities.
I read it as meaning that there's a much better chance that you're able to perform a trick, so the chance is the probability of filpping them for real, plus the chance of you being able to perform a trick to make it seem that you have.
• QE = Quantitative Easing

• ZIRP = Zero Interest Rate Policy
I'm interested. What is the subscription for? Are you running it through your own server?
What Is Linux Mobile
I see nothing wrong with Firefox's behavior in this case. Root CA certificates are just certificates that the issuer paid and lobbied to include into the browser's certificate store, and they agreed to rules about what they can and cannot do (to maintain trustworthiness).

The root CA then just signs a certificate for the intermediate (allowing them to issue certificates), and required the intermediate to contractually agree to the same rules... because if the intermediate violates the rules, the root CA and all intermediates would be removed from the browser.

Other than the contractual relationship between the parties, there's no difference between an intermediate CA and a root CA. Including an intermediate certificate in the store, makes it equivalent to the root certificate (which is a certificate that is trusted only because it is included in the browser's store).

The only downside to this I can see is that it creates more work to maintain the certificate store. Firefox can just ask the root CA to notify them when they issue an intermediate.. it isnt like this happens every day.
If you're looking to do gaming on Linux, AMD is much less hassle than Nvidia