skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In the United States, the term means you would have been kept out of white-only clubs. The average idiot in America might have forgotten that this has happened in living memory. So when someone uses it to refer to Japanese-Americans they might be signaling that they recognize a white-only rule existed in living memory.
I think it depends on what you are building and who are your competitors.

Many B2B apps are built as plain web apps that run in the web browser and connect to a backend (CRUD apps). That's because business customers care less about the presentation, and more about the value that the software might deliver. If it saves them time or money - they will buy it no matter what the UX is. And many of them even prefer a tab in the browser, since they do their work in the browser anyway.

With B2C users often expect a more polished experience. More often than not they pay for a nicer, more polished thing, rather than for something that solves a particular pain point. Of course, the app should be useful, but that's table stakes. The deciding factor often becomes the UX. Thus in B2C, the client technology plays a bigger role. Depending on how many competitors offer a native UX, the users might not even consider you if they see that the app is not lightning-fast or has some weird, custom UI that looks off.

React Native has some native UI elements, but then many other things such as the navigation stack are reimplemented from scratch which results in a UX that appears to be similar, yet may work in weird ways that differ from native behavior. Plus React Native is pretty slow in my experience, and like any cross-platform thing has a ton of other weird edge cases and annoyances.

I have not used Flutter, but from my understanding, they have reimplemented the whole UI stack from scratch, and draw everything on a low-level graphical canvas. This means that it is even less native than React Native. They emulate/copy the native UI, but it is not the same. Not to mention that they have to do a ton of work to keep up with the latest changes in Android and iOS. Feel free to correct me.

For B2B, React Native, Flutter, or even Web/Electron are perfectly fine. For some less competitive B2C categories as well. For super competitive ones native is almost always a requirement.
I don’t think the ability to quote the NYT is at the heart of this lawsuit. It’s that OpenAI used the NYT’s body of work to train its LLM and now built a business out of it without financially compensating the NYT. The verbatim snippets from articles are there to prove that OpenAI used NYT content in its training.

Maybe to a lesser degree, the lawsuit as about misquoting the NYT, and the damages that could cause the newspaper.
Nearly everything published in the last few years has been political, a growing trend since the mid-2000s. I'm finding myself watching shows from the 90s for escapism.
Technology is not a religion and it doesn’t need prophets. Why are people so hell bent on convincing others to join them in their use of whatever technology?

Pick what solves your problem. In the context of web development that overwhelming means using whatever is most popular given your preferred programming language.
Not exactly that, but for me it's squeezing politics into almost everything. It doesn't matter if I agree or disagree, it all feels like propaganda.
Right I mean, for B2B industrial robotic arm applications this might actually be a big improvement / breakthrough.

I just find it annoying how many of these AI companies are pumping goofy B2C applications.

Like they make it look as though they are building a breakthrough humanoid robotic assistant or something, but really that is still very very far away and not at all related to the "video trained robotic arm" breakthrough they are trying to communicate.
Isn’t that how any Go project is put online?
It is exactly the same. You can absoutely be sued for copyright infringement in your example.

https://www.adobe.com/legal/dmca.html

Just because you produce an infringing work doesn't mean it will be discovered and then a legal case made.
What is the stiffness of spacetime? (2018) [pdf]
Good Golang anda Svelte code organization, I Will take as example
I didn't see a reference to a joystick anywhere and there's none shown in the photo...?

Furthermore :) this spring I visited a PDP 11/73 running Spacewar with a joystick attached. Presumably that would have been attached as a QBus peripheral, and Vaxen could support QBus, so I'd actually be pretty surprised if there hadn't been a Vax with a built-in joystick. Depending how you define "built-in" that is.

Edit: Come to think of it I'd be very surprised if there weren't any flight simulators running off Vaxen and that would definitely involve a very much built-in joystick (along with the rest of the flight deck). I know a lot of those used PDP-11 so it would be the same lineage.
What, no? Earth to the moon is 200,000 miles away. Call it a half million for a round trip.

Airliner passenger deaths are 1 per several billion miles.
Welcome to the Valuepackstore Blog. Here you will find valuable information on different ways to make money online and learn effective strategies on how to generate income from various online opportunities. Explore our articles and start your journey towards financial freedom today.
> How is pressing buttons in photoshop different to pressing buttons in chatGPT?

It's not! That's the entire point. The liability is with the people, not the software. The software isn't being sued! You can't even do that, because the software isn't people. Software isn't humans. The people developing ChatGPT incorporated other people's copyrighted works into their product, and they're the ones being sued.
Can someone perhaps shed some light on what the risk is? Is there a gun that can be made with microfluidics?
you’ll never out-spend and out-support the regressive culture creating the problem at hand.
(Drawing from 1-semester CCNA course in uni) Since DNS operates over UDP, isn't the amount of data that can be safely transferred effectively bottlenecked by the smallest page size between the routers that reach your device? DNS is served in one chunk, right?
I'm wondering if they're licensing BlueTrack as well, it works well on all the surfaces I tried. I would love to have a refreshed model of the Microsoft Bluetooth mouse that could be paired to more than one device with a toggle.
This is a huge strawman argument that entirely ignores the heart of the issue. NYTimes, and other contributors to ChatGPT, should be compensated for their role in creating ChatGPT. It’s not as simple as quoting or not quoting, ChatGPT’s existence depends on its source material entirely. OpenAI and Microsoft are making money off of that source material. If the source was copyrighted, OpenAI/Microsoft need to compensate the owners.

Also, you can’t quote an entire article in a paper. You quote snippets, but ChatGPT is reproducing entire articles.
I’m wondering what cost function it’s using. Does it use a simulator?
Bing I hardly knew ya
It's just the same as any other Mastodon server, and the client is just a custom version of elk.zone.
Could you elaborate on the scam billions bit?
A collection of popular SQL queries from interviews. You can also share any SQL query you remember which were asked of you in interviews.
I liked Slashdot’s comment rating system. More expressive than a simple upvote or downvote.
Styling with WPF (the thing after winforms) was so confusing, at least from someone coming from CSS.
>in my experience with Python and its REPLey incarnations, I would have felt much more at peace if there was a good and reliable C++/Rust REPL

How so? My experience is exactly the opposite.
But photoshop doesn’t, for example, come with unlicensed National Geographic photos that it gives you as a starting point for you to create an infringing work.
So the ex wastes 1.2 million dollars of BTC to hurt them… rough…
Can someone make an open source version of this so developers can directly integrate themselves on AWS?
It's all the same: Mathematics is a kind of programming, programming is a kind of Mathematics. Mathematics people get to use longer words.
I can't directly quote shit, and I am useful.
The Difference Between Vermont and New Hampshire (2016)
Solar Pumps Are Empowering Women Farmers in India
are you using one of them or both? I'm using htmx and not sure if I really need alpine.js yet.
> Missiles in turn were much more effective than shells in WWII.

They were? I thought missiles were only really developed by the Germans towards the end of WW2 and were basically ineffective due to bad targeting caused by the British turning their spies. Also the missiles were horrifically expensive and contributed to the bankrupting of the war effort. Hitler couldn't let go of his new Wunderwaffe, but the cost/benefit analysis didn't make sense.

Which is what the article is about. The most advanced weapons don't necessarily help, if you bankrupt yourself making them.
Why True Watch Heads Never Set the Time on Their Watches
Humans are special for two reasons: you can’t clone them infinitely, and they are time-bound.

If I learn to write news articles by reading the NYT, I’m not then able to duplicate myself infinitely and fill every role at every news publisher. I am but one human, producing one human’s output and consuming one human’s space within whatever pursuit I undertake. Critically, I still leave room for others to do the same thing.

Eventually I also die and then someone else can come along to replace me. I’m finite, AI is not. It doesn’t get used up or retire.

If you consider that there’s a fixed amount of societal capacity for whatever undertaking is in question (news journalism, art generation, etc.) then as a human, I take up only a certain amount and only for a certain amount of time. I will never arbitrarily duplicate to produce the work of 10, 100, 1000, etc. humans. I will also shuffle on after about 50 years and someone else, having potentially learnt from me, can now gainfully exist within the world in my stead.

The capacity for infinite commoditisation that AI brings is necessarily a critical distinction to humans when it comes to considering them performing equivalent functions. They must be treated differently.
This depends on how light the traffic is. In a lot of places, traffic outside of rush hours is light to moderate (but definitely not light enough to justify disabling the lights), and the roundabouts might the more efficient solution, at least outside of rush hours. It was probably studied by someone already, as this would make a decent research topic for any transporation scientist.
I've had a very similar experience a few weeks ago and even fell for the same double-userdata misunderstanding.

The documentation itself is actually good and extensive, however it feels like the authors expect its users to deeply understand the library itself. It is also harder to find some "Getting Started" docs as most provided examples felt way too bloated coming from a nodejs/ws background. Compared to the other library[1] I was considering, it took much longer to get even a simple "echo" server running.

However having used lws for some time now, I am really happy with it! The API is very clean, mostly intuitive and provides everything you need, without feeling bloated or becoming too verbose. Sometimes documentation still feels a bit harder to find, but it can be figured out eventually.
One great feature for me was being able to accept both WebSocket as well as raw TCP connections on the same port, this is extremely easy and just required settings the flag LWS_SERVER_OPTION_FALLBACK_TO_RAW.

I encountered other hiccups. They are fully documented and completely valid, but were really confusing to me as a first-time user:

* Sending data requires a specific memory layout[2] – namely having to allocate memory for the websocket header youself before the actual message you want to send. This gave me confusing segfaults in the beginning.

* Sending data / responding to a client message will probably (but not always) fail when just naively using "lws_write()". To correctly send data you need to manually queue your message data, request the "ON_WRITABLE" callback[3] and only then actually send.

[1]: https://github.com/Theldus/wsServer

[2]: https://libwebsockets.org/lws-api-doc-v3.0-stable/html/group... (see the "IMPORTANT NOTICE")

[3]: https://libwebsockets.org/lws-api-doc-main/html/group__callb...
You knowing your subnet is not the issue. The other party needs to know it.

WebRTC needs info about where to try to connect. It doesn’t specify the signaling method which is how you get that information and share it.

If you’re already on the same subnet, use mDNS.

If you’re on different subnets it requires some kind of way to share the subnet info.

If you’re on different networks behind NAT then scanning isn’t very helpful. You’d need to scan IPs and ports because NAT randomizes the outbound ports. That’s what STUN helps you figure out. Once you’ve got that info and you build the session description structure you can send that to the other party however you want.

Public, free STUN servers exist. And people use them for all kinds of WebRTC stuff.

Neither WebRTC nor WebSockets prevent pure P2P. It sounds like your bigger issue is with NAT. IPv6 isn’t going to fix it though since the IP space will be too large to scan for peers.
If this is making coffee, I don't want to live in this android future.
But the point is that you can do far more good by sending the money to some of the people who need it most, those in the lowest economic positions.

Rather than effectively sending it to the "average" Bitcoin user, which is definitely not in the lowest economic position -- and whatever the average Bitcoin holder spends on charity, it's only a small percent.

This is why Bill Gates spends his money on the Gates Foundation where it's designed to help those who need it most, rather than lighting all his money on fire so that the deflationary impact will help everyone in proportion to their savings.
If we give personhood to software, wouldn't it mean that you cannot shutdown or delete it ever? You cannot destroy the equipment it is on? As clearly that would be murder.

What would be your financial responsibility to keep AI running?
Two weeks ago, I let my partner use my data roaming to submit two forms on some Adobe collaboration thing, reply to a chat message on Teams and send an email. The counter on my phone said these actions used about 500 MB of bandwidth in the space of about 20 minutes.

I agree it sounds exaggerated, but I don’t think it is. This is kind of my point, it’s past the point you would think likely.
It's not pseudoscience, but since you call it that, I would love a few references.

Sugar is non-essential, i.e. you don't need sugar to live.

Table sugar (which has a lower glycemic index than bread or rice) is part glucose, part fructose. Both increase systemic inflammation and the latter is toxic to the liver and causes NAFLD. Fructose is processed the same way as alcohol.

On the other hand I find the longevity business lacking in a proven lifespan-extending supplement or diet.

Also you can be fat and healthy (overconsuming calories), as long as fat is being stored in brown adipose tissue. When it's visceral fat or it infiltrates the muscle, that's when inflammation is kickstarted and health problems become inevitable.
Often times people don't disable JS, networking hiccups and bad JS disable JS.
htmx = client-server networking
Alpine = JS sprinkles

Alpine is for example, I want to show/hide a menu on mobile. I want to upload files via drag and drop. I want to have a bin icon over an image when I hover with mouse to delete it. I want to double click an input field to edit it. I want to close an overlay when I click outside of it, or when I press “esc”.

Also modals, although you can do them in htmx very nicely too, so that’s borderline.

Anything that involves network, htmx.
Things that are just frontend, Alpine suits better.

_hyperscript is basically the Alpine equivalent.

It's like the difference between Turbo and Stimulus in the Rails world
I really hope Mastodon is just a stepping stone and evolutionary dead end.

The "federation mods are all powerful" is another step in the wrong direction. Reddit mods revel in the control they wield, and we've already seen this happening in the Mastodon ecosystem all over again.

BlueSky's protocol will allow end users to subscribe to the moderator(s) they want without having to worry about choices being made for them carte blanche by online dictators lording over their fiefdoms.

The internet bred the worst kind of power structures. We're sliding backwards with these platforms that enable and empower useless middle managers.
Why doesn't Google need licensing to scrape and reproduce NYT snippets in their results? OpenAI doesn't even quote the sources its consumed to produce it's output. It seems totally fair use to me. Any given content site has authors that read stuff that is copyrighted and produce their own take.
Slight overreaction there
> There must be hundreds of comic authors out there to get this many in a year

Oh, buddy, you are in for a treat, here's some publishers just off the top of my head: https://drawnandquarterly.com https://www.topshelfcomix.com https://www.silversprocket.net https://www.fantagraphics.com and there's a lot more after that.
Yes, you are correct. And even more specifically its a legal issue. The old TOS guaranteed to enforce data separation and now it does not. Its not about the technology, its about loosening constrains on user generated data. Do you think I care if they expose my data through LLM or heuristics based recommendation engine? This is not cake pictures from Instagram, it has legal ramifications.
Location: Aurora, CO

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies:

Ruby, GraphQL, React.js, Node.js, GitHub, AngularJS, Coffeescript, CSS, HAML, HTML5, JavaScript, Kubernetes, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Python, Redux, RESTful APIs, TypeScript

Engineering Management, Project Management, Technical Project Management, Career Coaching, Mentoring, Agile, Kanban, Roadmapping, Banking, FinTech, Medical, Incident Management, Platform Support, Product Support

Résumé/CV:https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonephraim/

Email: hijasonephraim (at) gmail (dot) com

Software Engineer with most recent experience as Engineering Manager and Technical Project Manager at a global FinTech enterprise with experience managing teams of up to 10 remote team members while contributing individually to the launch of critical features and platform stability.
That’s not what was happening though?
You aren't worthless.
Only the NetBSD community could have come up with a project this cool!
You’re right, but I think it’s fundamentally impossible to do with the current state of technology. Imagine the word “democracy”, would you be able to tell me where you’ve first learned the definition of it and be able to provide a direct citation of it? What about the thousands of other instances where you’ve seen that word defined? (In OpenAI’s case probably hundreds of millions)

Current LLMs work in a similar way, the information is synthesized by correlation, there is no way that it can directly relate where it learned it’s output from. The only viable way would be to do a reverse lookup of the output to find out if there’s a similar worded content on the internet. (Or what Perplexity does, wrap an LLM around search results, but you lose a lot of flexibility in this case)
...except those field are literally a thousands years old, while software industry is about 70?
Them being more mature doesn't change the fact that processes and tools are crucial
Your 10 year old mac can ingest the input at 157GB/s? Is that from RAM or from disk?
Think of it as a wafer with lots of SoCs that happen to be interconnected to each other. The smaller the individual SoC, the higher the number of full-function SoCs on the wafer.
> (apparently someone spits gum in the urinals?)

Former janitor here: people do this all the time, everywhere. On the scale of terrible things people do in the restrooms, this one is pretty mild -- but don't do it. Have a thought for the person who cleans up your mess.
Why does every hype-funded general purpose robot (Tesla bot, this robot) NEED to be shaped like a human. I get that our built environment is designed for humans, and some sci-fi loving part of me loves it.

But it feels like theatrics. Boston dynamics makes utilitarian robots, that all have a seemingly purpose built design to them. Even the bipedal + 2 arms + a head robot Atlas, isn’t forced to constrain itself to human proportions. By comparison this robot seems pretty unstable. I wonder if that has to do with humans and robots being fundamentally made of different materials with very different properties.

I probably answered my own question by calling it “hype-funded”.
It is, but there are plenty of parts of Christianity that Americans tend to forsake, like the part about forgiving debts (see the recent debates over student loan forgiveness) or turning swords into plowshares (see the entire history of the US.) Americans will give a thousand dollars to a charitable organization for the tax write-off but not a dime to the homeless vet on the streetcorner, because "he'll probably just use it for drugs." Americans took a religion whose prophet said "it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven" and created the prosperity gospel, which claimed that wealth was instead a sign of God loving you more.

If America were truly a Christian nation it would be far too "socialist" for many Americans to stomach.
Oh please. For any local/state/fed program, there's MONTHS of means testing, multiple assessments of various kinds, multiple times to prostrate yourself to show that you *really* are in need of help.

Oh, and then you get denied. Multiple times.

This country would rather "useless" (read: cant make money for capitalists) people die.
> But the "MPA to another results page" causing an HTML reload with a flickering blank screen is a jarring UI experience.

Pretty much every modern full stack framework includes approaches to do partial renders and / or DOM morphs of server generated HTML responses, eliminating the full-page refresh effect.

www.mcmaster.com seems to utilize this to some degree, actually - while yes there are JSON responses, there are what appear to be HTML partial responses as well that are presumably injected on the page. In any case, everything on that search engine would be trivially accomplished using a server rendered HTML approach without needing to utilize a SPA. It's actually a great example of something that would work great with progressive enhancement - the search bar can start as a simple input that leads to full page search results, the navigation can do a full page refresh if the partial page refresh JS isn't available for some reason. Javascript can make it better without being a requirement.

A good rule of thumb is that if an interaction existed at roughly the same fidelity during the Web 2.0 days, it's not something that requires a SPA framework. Typeahead search results and categorized product listings existed and were functional to the level of the site you linked back then.
It’s only not in small planes, and then because of cost.
Reproductive tools (like photoshop or photocopiers) require a human in the loop and a previous instance of the copyrighted material to reproduce copyrighted content. They don’t ship with copyrighted content inside of them. ChatGPT contains a compressed representation of all NYTimes articles and will freely reproduce them when queried. That’s the key difference. Similarly it would not be an issue to sell a database tool that could store news articles but it would be an issue to sell one pre-loaded with all NYTimes articles ever written.
> Citation needed?

Pixels.
The irony here is that there’s 99% chance that the NYT is using ChatGPT internally. Even their journalists, unbeknownst to their bosses.