skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You're a puerile dolt. Who is to say we have any rights with regards to the moon? Your foolish attitude is grotesque, you'd just like the biggest and least risk-averse kid do whatever they'd want to do in the sandbox? This just in, they just took a shit in the school's sandbox, have fun rolling around in shit! We'll see who's crying then.

We should treat & act towards the Earth & Moon with great respect and great caution, we were given the right to live by God or the Earth & the Moon. Its time we take a step back and learn we live *with* the land and *because* of the land...I could go on and on but I'd be happily surprised if you take the time to find gratitude for the moon.
I think this is what Robert Jackall refers to as "morall mazes", company cultures that are so far removed from practical reality and ethical behavior that it's impossible for a good-faith actor to navigate them.
I interpreted this as "LibreOffice is primarily used on Linux, while Office is almost exclusively used on Windows. Windows has much larger desktop market share than Linux, so it is not surprising that Office prefers the Office-specific format."

For what it's worth, [docx][1] is technically standard. Not sure how that pans out in practice.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Open_XML
> it was being used at the time, and thus unlocked

Although it may well have been reconfigured, by default iPhones will lock up after a short inactivity.
Not to be pedantic , technically he is correct, but he's lying by omission.

They had an internal policy violation on Friday, but they didn't say it was the first.
While reading individual metrics might be easier with numbers, with gauges you can scan the whole system at low precision very quickly.

It is also easier to just see "fuel red", "temperature normal" than 12.5L or 89.5C.
as another sibling points out, this seems too high.
Their official website speaks about millions of lines of code [1]. They also published an article (2017) where they proudly say, they got rid of half a million lines of code [2]. A comment on HN from someone who might have insider info says 20M lines of C [3].

Would be great to get the sources from the video. Maybe they talked about compiled assembly?

[1] https://www.asml.com/en/technology/software
[2] https://www.asml.com/en/news/stories/2017/knowing-how-to-cod...
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18463181
Let's get rid of them the second Russia does. I'll wait.
What a comment. But the young generation does not know anymore what this means.
Greater-Tokyo has a population density about 15 times more than Greater-LA. If LA had Tokyo density you could fit pretty much the entire US population in it.
When I turn on Airplane mode on my iPhone, it switches bluetooth into that "not quite off" mode that you get if you just tap the Bluetooth button in the control center (the icon goes white rather than a cross through it like if you turn it off completely in Settings). The Not Quite Off mode IIRC allows stuff like Apple Watch, Apple Pencil, Handoff, Find My, etc[0] to use Bluetooth but it disconnects all the paired Bluetooth devices you are using (basically it solves that "damn my phone is still connected to the headphones in the other room!" problem that 90% of people turning Bluetooth off are trying to fix)

[0] Full list https://support.apple.com/en-au/102412
California Dreamin' of -15°C ..
I second the author’s recommendation for CSS modules. However

> And because the styling code lives outside your TypeScript files, you don't get type safety and autocompletion.

You actually do, there’s a TypeScript plugin from CSS modules that generates types for your CSS classes (at least).
If you ask question a bit differently, then it's not a mystery at all. Why brain parts that have neural structure, which is conductive to fine and agile motor control, perform motor control?
You can't just blindly run git commands without being aware of current state. Some beginners or people with less technical roles try to use git by blindly running 3 commands they memorized, but that easily results in a mess or situation where it's necessary to call a more experienced colleague to fix their local copy.

For me one of the biggest benefits of using a git GUI is always visible current state: what you have checked out, what are the recent commit, what's the state of other branches, do i have any unmodified files. All of it in front of my eyes, not requiring any additional input (beside alt tab for switching to the graphical git client). Not that you couldn't get the same information from git CLI, but the question is how often would you do that, and would you check all of it each time.

But I often perform many of the actual changes in terminal using the default git CLI client.

In this sense I consider shell integration based version control clients bad, as they require using context menu to open the information windows and it's a step that can be skipped since most of the other actions will likely be in the same context menu. Thus you endup with similar situation as CLI clients - information is available but you have to actively request it.

Next step to consider is TUI vs GUI. I find that that often due to constraints of fixed character grid and limited graphical elements TUI can be less dense. Every box and separator line means a wasted row/column. Two boxes side by side - that's two wasted rows. Everything being monospace font - additional wasted space. Single font size for everything - makes it impossible to use smaller size font for short less important text. You can set a very small text size in terminal, but it hurts overall readability of the TUI and all other work you do in terminal, and it doesn't change the fact that TUI was designed with limited available space in mind thus you only get slightly longer text but no additional information.
On the other hand TUI will more likely have a very efficient keyboard only navigation and single key actions. GitUI and many Norton commander inspired TUI file managers like FAR and MC are good examples of this.
It's a video where the speaker says the conspiracy theory, while the video shows irrelevant gameplay.

The argument starts with the thesis that "you should use modern C++ everywhere" is generally meant to mean "you should use value semantics everywhere."

This is odd to me since my C++ experience is from the 1990s when "you should use modern C++ everywhere" often meant "use string instead of char *" and "use new instead of malloc". I see the emphasis on using value semantics as being a delta on top of the older meaning, where the old meaning still exist, but the speaker just naturally assumes them to be correct.

I don't have much experience with modern C++ but I thought the speaker's complaints about "this begin() and end() everywhere" has been (mostly?) resolved with range-based for loops added in C++11 and various improvements since then, and the complaint about string split has been resolved with std::ranges::views::split in C++20, like the example at https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/ranges/split_view .

Which makes it sound like those issues can be resolved by ... using modern C++ everywhere.

The author correctly highlights how some standard library components have faster equivalents elsewhere, concluding "so they provide the STL for you and it's a piece of crap, right? But you have to use it because it's the modern way to do thing."

Thing is, the author already pointed to Boost as a faster alternative for map, for example. Using modern C++ does not mean only using the STL.

The author seems to think that people using Boost are generally considered dinosaurs. Which doesn't fit my understanding.

I stopped listening about 5 minutes in when the author said the concepts behind the movement to use modern C++ are "virtue signalling". It's a culture war term that has no real useful meaning here, and a far more appropriate term is "shibboleth".
You're living the libertarian dream. No pesky government getting in the way, just free association between you and the person who owns your means of life.
Or maybe he's alive and well under a new identity.
Because there isn't much difference in the force between a 1m and a 8000m drop due to the above. So it really comes down to case, angle, and material onto which it was dropped with corners being more vulnerable.
I am technical, and I have no phone security (screen lock). I am sure that professional hackers can more easily steal my credentials remotely (phishing, etc) than from physical possession of my phone.

That said, I understand why most people want to use a phone screen lock.

I am sure this post will be downvoted.
Welcome to Hell: Mars Pet Hospitals (2022)
Why use C in 2024?
There's a price for life in a given society though. Due to resources being finite and wellbeing mattering. In the UK I believe NICE uses £30k/QALY as the price.
Dude, I'm gonna have to ask you to back up your statements with some actual data, because what you said doesn't match the what I found at all.

To be specific, I mean these charts of those countries' total spending [0] and govt/compulsory spending [1] during that time period. (Using the OECD stats visualization tool [2].)

For total spending [0] UK's spend-growth was less than France's (not greater) and for govt/compulsory spending [1] the UK's larger growth over that period was still in the same ballpark of ~1.31x versus France's ~1.28.

In other words, the nearest number I can derive for your "increasing at a rate X% higher than France's" is around 1.31/1.28 = ~2.4%. Yet you said 2000%! That's a gap of three entire orders of magnitude which desperately need explanation.

[0] https://data.oecd.org/chart/7jcQ

[1] https://data.oecd.org/chart/7jcV

[2] https://data.oecd.org/healthres/health-spending.htm
Thats an harder and harder position to defend with ever week the civilian population in Gaza is treated the way it is.

The very sad and pragmatic truth might be that mutually assured destruction might have been able to prevent this.

Its especially bad since thats the way the Soviet Union got its nukes.
> An anonymous executive at the AIVD said that the government may have deliberately not been informed of the operation due to the potential political consequences

Pretty bad when intelligence services customarily operate above the law and don't even tell the government they're supposedly beholden to.
Possibly depends on your definition of adolescence. I'm 35. Wikipedia says "age provides only a rough marker of adolescence, and scholars have not agreed upon a precise definition", so if you want me to answer you accurately, you're going to have to provide more definition.
What if hedge funds would lose even more in those periods?
A similar insight from economist Daniel Davies from 2005:

>> The optimal frequency of disasters is not zero. This graceful formulation is due to Prof. Richard Portes, who used to say it about emerging market financial crises. However, it’s a fundamental principle of risk management and one of entirely general application. Most dangers can be absolutely eliminated for all practical purposes, but only at unacceptable cost.

https://blog.danieldavies.com/2005/07/?m=1
To answer your question with a question: What is so bad about giving a regime that (re)invented suicide bombings a nuke?
Markdown-in-git used to be used for tech specs at my company. Now we switched to Google Docs, which means we need to maintain a "change log" section at the bottom because Docs history is... not a commit log.

Markdown in git, reviewed as a pull request on GitHub, is the best way to do an RFC. I will die on this hill.

Alternatively, I wonder if an old school message board would work. Each RFC gets its own (sub)board, and within that board each thread is a discussion about some topic -- an individual review, debate about a section, etc. I wonder if such a thing already exists, _specifically_ for technical specification review.
But snap is another security layer. Firefox snap is more secure than .deb version from Mozilla. Snap may catch a zero day.

The server apps I tried are good. If you don’t want fancy features, nextcloud snap runs like a tank, and self updates.

As an end user, I don’t want to worry about updates either. I know developers have different opinions due to their jobs.
You are trying to flamebait. Why is the regime loathed by plenty?
All politics aside, the more countries with nukes there are, the likelier one gets used, whether intentionally or by accident.
Thankyou for the awesome library! I have a question.

Is there a way to use HTMX with minimal server side changes. Specifically if I have an existing page that you fill in a form and submit and response is of course the entire page. I think it would be cool to tell htmx that the whole page is being returned BUT I only want to update #my-form and that way you don’t need any “if htmx request” kinda stuff on the server.

This is for people who care about their site working without JS. But also it allows you to have a single backend endpoint to handle multiple things (for example comments, sign up to email, like button, all in one)
because you’re dropping it on tiles or pavement which are a lot less squishy than the grass it landed on
I would like to emphasise that the parent has said "where we choose to place them", so they're not contradicting the grandparents metaphor, just giving an interesting FYI.
“Rounding errors in unit translation may have occurred.”
How's the noise level?
"In 1999, his fortune was almost three times that of Buffett, who was the second-richest person at the time. That year, Gates’s wealth surged past the $100 billion mark"

I just ran a backtest[1] of Microsoft (MSFT) vs S&P 500 (SPY) starting in 1999 with $100 billion (dividends reinvested). MSFT would have resulted in $1.7 trillion, and SPY in $600 billion. Given the significantly higher risk of investing in MSFT versus SPY, I think SPY would have been the better choice nonetheless. Moreover, MSFT only started to perform stronger since 2016, before that, SPY was ahead of MSFT most of the time.

[1]: https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/backtest-portfolio#analy...
First, hat tip for terminal velocity research. That is a nice addition to this discussion.

I was thinking exactly the same about the landing. If it lands in a soft place, like tall grass, most phones should be fine. Most phones are broken by falling onto hard surfaces.
Nobody wants nuclear weapons in the hands of crazy Islamic extremists who have vowed to destroy their neighbor.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/hailing-hamas-iranian-presiden...
I asked an Iranian coworker if the Iranian government is serious or if it's just a bad translation when we hear them call America and Israel "the Great Satan". Apparently they are entirely sincere about that.
If you're a random terrorist/military group and opposes the west, you will get automatically sponsorship from Iran. It's quite concerning what Iran would do if they had nukes
> Which year of the Ford Mustang?

1971.5
And I honestly never understood this apart from Microsoft wanting to finally kill Win16: after all, it’s not like V86 mode (whose absence in x86-64 is the official justification) is actually required—non-x86 versions of NT had perfectly serviceable Win16 support through the extremely expected approach of having a full PC emulator inside[1]. (Some even extremely briefly had x86 Win32 support[2], but that wasn’t resurrected for Windows for ARM either, perhaps because the sheer amount of stuff in the system has grown so much since that time.)

[1] http://bytepointer.com/resources/old_new_thing/20060525_178_...

[2] http://retro.ircx.net.pl/nt/mips/wx86/
Money would be a fun game if it didn't have real world consequences.
No protection? I drop mine from time to time and never experienced any damage
> SPY for example is tied to the lifespan of a bunch of not-quite-random people

Can you go into this more?
You can play solitaire family games in exaequOS: https://exaequos.com/?a=/usr/games/csol
So you want Hamas to get nuclear weapons?
I don’t think people without a home charger are buying a lot of EVs. The value isn’t there.

But anyway my point is that this combined number is meaningless and unhelpful even in that case. Highway provides a minimum number. Any other test just produces confusion and disappointment.
The passage I quoted is one paragraph out of seven pages spent addressing the challenges in defining and analyzing ethnic groups and drawing conclusions from that data, not to mention numerous caveats and counter-examples provided throughout the text intermixed with his methodology and data analyses, or the extra text re-enforcing these problems in the conclusion -- not some brief cover-your-ass passage but rather one quote from a lengthy and detailed academic analysis of the problems inherent in this data. It would be obvious had you read the paper -- but you selectively pick and choose whatever information and "data" that supports your racist conclusions and don't examine it any further in case it would turn out not to, a trend seen in every source you have cited in this discussion.
Surface, angle of contact, luck.

One of my phones made multiple falls onto asphalt and iron grates to no worse than superficial edge band scratches.

One day it flipped onto my desk from a few inches and that cracked the screen.
Or just ask the phone and it will tell you.
Show HN: Getting Nvidia GPU Information Using HTTP Requests
Reading a meter is a two step process for me: I first need to devote some attention to reading the meter, then and only then can I read what the meter is saying.

Contrast reading a number: I read the number. Done. One step. Quick and easy.

Reading meters is not and never has been fast for me. Even scanning a bunch of meters is hard compared to just scanning a collection of numbers, because I can't tell WTF the meters are saying by just glancing at them.

I attribute this to my growing up absolutely surrounded by numbers everywhere I went, in stark contrast to older people who grew up absolutely surrounded by meters everywhere they went. My brain is simply not wired up to read meters.

I'm a 21st century man, I read numbers faster and easier. Give me the god damn numbers, thank you; we have the technology now.
I didn’t know that - very useful!
It returns a single phone for me. No information, just a stock photo and a link to buy it,
I wasn't talking just about Zig's implementation of comptime, I was talking about collapsing the distinction between compiler and program -- if done well then the problems mentioned in that article need not occur.

I think the key feature here is making compilation a program that you write wherein you can fully introspect your program. Worries here about IDE support fadeaway, as the full state of the compiler is available -- if some annotations on code are required to guide IDEs, so be it.

I wasnt saying that type systems should be replaced with compile-time programs, only that they are compile time programs, and often really bad ones. (My claim: Programmers shouldnt only have the type system to program the compiler.)

Better that the type system be extremely simple and let the programer transform their program as they wish.
Seems unlikely Iran already figured it out within two weeks of the event.
As an Australian, great to see the tree kangaroo reference.
Communication is bidirectional so there is no need for the downlink to be more powerful than the uplink: the phone must be able to send data to the satellite using its own antenna and battery.

However in theory a more powerful downlink could send data down to the phone faster than the phone sends it up to the satellite.
Where is this nuance articulated on their site? All I see is mention that it can be used as a ‘fully featured stack’ or ‘pick and choose’?
> According to the newspaper, the Stiekem committee, which translates to “secret committee,"

It doesn't translate to secret committee really. Secret = geheim in Dutch.

The term stiekem has a definite negative connotation. A more accurate translation would be the "sneaky committee"
Dumb phones tend to have much better battery life and are smaller. Can you even have an Android phone with an old-school numeric keyboard? I guess it's either a full size touch screen, or some niche qwerty keyboards, or nothing.
If it wasn't fragile - people would not buy cases and protective glass for their phone.

Old plastic phones were indestructible. I still have somewhere nokia 3310. It just refuses to die, unlike many smartphones I had.
> I want to hear from you

Since you asked - I‘m going to be a grumpy old man and yell at the clouds - I hate superapps. With a passion. I really hope we start to move away from them, I would much rather use 18 different apps and uninstall the ones I don’t need than dig through the noise of the superapp, which inevitably becomes cluttered, hard to navigate and impossible to customise. I understand why big companies do it, since it gets foot in the door and makes it easier for the user to try other services even if they intended to only use one, but as a user I despise the experience 100% of the time.
This is almost the true Turing test. Its two humans, one chatbot. One human is trying to detect which of the other two participants is the human and which is the robot (they know there is a robot)
After reading "According to the newspaper, the software cost over a billion dollars to develop" , I stopped. Can anyone believe that claim ?
Sounds not true because Buffet has specifically said not to diversify in shareholder updates.
Getting above the fresnel zone is another important hurdle to surmount. That’s at least 15 feet for a lot of 5GHz transceivers that are a mile apart.
No.

Please take this in the nicest way: If thats what you took away from my post you might want to evaluate how much narratives have affected your reasoning skills.
strace works on anything that makes a system call - written in any language
Pretty bad for the rest of us, but not bad for the people in government who want plausible deniability for actions taken by the espionage services. I would assume that every government has this, at least to some extent, don't you think?
Low LUCK attribute.
GitHub: Our Move to Generated SDKs
I wonder if they really didn't know though.

There's not knowing and "not knowing". Plausible deniability and all.
It's kind of the point though.
It would be silly to assume that the criteria that yields a law (or a system) be itself subject to that law or system. Logically, that criteria must encompass the system and cannot at all be subject to it
Just don't lie to players. In Tetris it is well-known that a bag is used and that is part of the game rules that everyone but the most casual players will know about. Other games, unfortunately, secretly filter randomness behind the scenes to make Gambler's fallacy real, pretending that random events are independent when they're not.
> Reading a meter is a two step process for me: I first need to devote some attention to reading the meter, then and only then can I read what the meter is saying.

If you really have to "devote some attention" to reading a fuel or temperature gauge, every time, I would avoid driving all together because so much of safe driving depends on scanning and peripheral vision.

And I struggle to see how you can't read a gauge which resembles real world as close as possible, you might as well argue that you can't see how much a glass is full or roughly how much ink is left in a pen without a digital indicator.
Oh I don't know. Perhaps murdering women because they refuse to wear a piece of cloth?