skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Any chance you can add a link to download for Windows but NOT on MS Store? I (and perhaps many others) have the bridges to the mothership torn down, so not MS Store.
Testing the cognitive limits of large language models [pdf]
There is a difference between Russian and American deterrent use of nuclear weapons and a North Korean and Iranian wish to have nuclear weapons as a tactical option. Using nuclear weapons as a threat in international interactions is far crazier than the Russian / American self defence stance.

Still in principle I think we should strive for nobody to have nuclear weapons, but given that that is far away the next best thing is to not let any new actor add nuclear weapons to their arsenal.
Maybe my morning coffee didn't kick in yet, but where are the lies? Or why dismiss them as lies and then go on a "I've succeeded (or think I had) and this is what I think" monologue?
You can use "-e trace=open" to trace only open(2) calls

Alternatively "-e trace=%file" to get all file-related system calls (will catch eg failing pre-emptive checks using access(3) -> stat(2)).
Unlikely, as plugging in a charger cable without electrical power has no effects on an iPhone.
See also "In Case of Moon Disaster."
If I understood correctly, you can achive this with `hx-target` and `hx-select` - I'm doing this in an app to replace an editor content based on which link is clicked.

- https://htmx.org/attributes/hx-select/
- https://htmx.org/attributes/hx-target/
Because they love to destabilize the region through their proxies. Look at their good work now: Yemen at war (they sponsor Houthi rebels), Israel at war (they sponsor Hamas and Hezbollah) and look at the state of Lebanon now (they also played a major role in Syria but I wouldn't say they were contributing to destabilising it, ISIS backers and the anti-Al Assad western coalition probably did more harm).

Iran can at least be pressured now with retaliations. Once it becomes a nuclear power, even the US will be forced to trade carefully.

Now some hope that nuclear armed states become "responsible" as a result of feeling safe, and don't sponsor terrorism. But that clearly didn't work with Pakistan (major backer of the talibans, and by extension of Al Quaeda) and North Korea (aggresses South Korea regularly and issues random threats to attract attention).

And nuclear deterrence only works when the parties do no want to die. When their religion tells them it's great to die for Jihad, I don't think their is any deterrence, it's a completely different dynamic.

And with ethnic tensions all over the middle east, and Iran's stated objective to destroy Israel, no one in the middle east is really keen to be threatened by Iran's nukes.
How to Find Contacts by Company Name
Hi,

During the holidays, I developed this little application, https://contactfinder.io. It helps find any contact profile (name + position + direct email + LinkedIn) using AI, Sales Nav, Google dorking, email finders, and email verification.

We can't really call it OSINT (that would be bullshift), but it's honestly cool. Imagine you have a list of companies in Dubai, you're looking for recruiters, HR directors... boom, we find it all for you.
> ETFs are traded on the stock markets.

So an ETF is an exchange traded fund. Public equities are also exchange traded but that doesn't mean that ETFs are traded on the stock market.

> With ETFs you can't invest in a specific thing. You are investing in some category.

Not really though?

You can buy gold, silver, crude oil and a bunch of other commodities. You have currency ETFs, Real Estate ETFs, etc.

There's volatility ETFs if you want to hedge risk. There's tons of "specific things".

You also have futures markets. So you can also buy a futures contract for corn or something.

There's also betting markets, but those aren't really "buying anything". I guess you can buy an "athlete/team's performance" by betting on them.
I’ve talked to a fair share of insiders myself and general consensus is that the hardware basically sells itself, and customers approach the software stack as something they’re unfortunately stuck with.

ASML developed new software products over the years but it didn’t pan out and at this point customers are wary of anything being sold and would rather keep 20 year old inefficient but proven to work systems around. Think racks of control systems next to DUV machines that are officially years EOL but ASML is forced to sell today because it’s all a customer is willing to buy into.
That's just some luck.

I recently dropped mine by tagging by earphone wire and it landed on the top corner with a spectacular bang and cracked the whole screen.

Though it's the second phone I drop with consequences, after Ericsson A1018s.

Other people usually aren't that lucky.
The policies of Iranian regime are in the least bit affected by longing for lost democracy.
Picking an integer between 1 and 1000000 without replacement.
If that is indeed true, then Bill Gates must be kicking himself for losing all that money.

Drinking his champagne. In his hot tub. On his yacht in the mediterranean.
Figure's humanoid can now watch, learn and perform tasks autonomously
I think that countries with an imperialistic or aggressive neighbor should have the nuclear weapon, but this countries should be democracies, otherwise an insane or fanatic dictator/regime can just use it even if it will wipe out his country since he might think they go to heaven and get their rewards there.

I understand that countries that already have their weapon do not want the smaller countries to get it, and a lot of people from big countries are OK if small countries get genocided if it prevent ww3 or if it keeps the bills down.
Tesla Model Y: My 6 months impressions
Hi there, I'm from the Trivy team -- you can scan the misconfiguration of container images i.e. Dockerfile, with Trivy as well.

However, without the source code being open source, you cannot really check what anyone is up to -- thus, don't just use any container image on DockerHub
Prolly can, and they prolly settle, but good luck with your random ban incoming in 2 weeks for something totaly unrelated.
Statistics show the least accidents occur at up to 15% over the speed limit, because that is the speed the good drivers go.

I would fully support a speed limit system based on driving skill. However, since we have a purely speed based system those driving the limit should not get tickets.
Yes, but isn't this obvious when you internalize the concept of "diminishing returns"? The domain might matter, as developers with some experience will understand for instance that the optimal amount of bugs is non-zero, but sometimes fail to generalize.
Not gonna lie, I'm both awed and confused.

Awed it could resist 5000 meters freefall and still be operative 3 days later.

Confused as it did not lock for such a long time.
Often with the brain multiple regions are needed for a single function. For example planing action including movement has much to do with the prefrontal cortex and the basal ganglia is much involved in making smooth motions and inhibiting tremors, etc. Problems with the dopamine system also affect things like planing (ADHD) and tremors (Parkinson’s).
How could the cop see them doing 55 if the conditions were zero vis?
But how do you pick the input for the hash?
GateMate European FPGA and open source tool chain
On the other hand Munger said that diversification is for those who don't know what they're doing. So maybe Gates wanted to stock pick and Buffet talked him into diversifying safely
> Anyone trying to hide it would be spending time equivalent to just making the art themselves.

That's basically the argument why Jason Allen should have been allowed to win the art competition, is it?

It's not that he typed "award winning painting" into Midjourney and the image was the result.

He tried hundreds of seeds, selected one that he liked and refined it over countless iterations with infilling until he was satisfied with the result.

I honestly don't see how this is fundamentally different from other art forms.
The second Iran government has access to nuclear weapons, they're going to nuke Israel and that's not going to be the end of it!
I remember watching the news a couple of years ago, The president of Iran at the time said we don't have any problem with the Israeli people, it's only the Israel government, the next day Iran's supreme leader said, Israeli people are also responsible and we condemn them!
these people don't even care about their own people, in Iran's last protest, they basically killed thousands of high school and college kids!
It still is a 1 in a million chance if you have no a priori knowledge about the way the random numbers are distributed.
>If it's a person picking the number that definitely isn't a 1 in a million chance for most numbers.

Only if the person isn't aware of the issues involved.
Fishtank Live Season 2
No they mostly back Shia groups. You won't see then supporting ISIS.
The UK government's phobia of doing anything in-house almost certainly stems from the enormous amount of money that the political class makes from government contracts.

The NHS could be as slow and bloated as a whale corpse, but doing everything in-house would probably still be more successful than contracting fraudster companies.
Current date and time.
Winning rock-paper-scissors enough times against cgpgray: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PmWQmZXYd74
It's more like you have total agency and the burdens that come with that. To each their own!
Never heard of ZippyDB. Shame it is not open source.
Your broker can route the big order to the exchanges. So that part about the broker is pretty irrelevant.

In any case, you are right that you would want to be careful about moving a billion dollars into S&P500 all at once. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't invest in an index ETF.

So there's a difference in how much your position affects the overall market, and how much getting in and out of the position quickly would affect the overall market.

You can have a look at the daily volumes of the relevant ETF to get an estimate. SPY seems to have a daily volume of dozens of billions of dollar traded. So a single billion over a day might not actually make that much of a difference.

Btw, if you just give the market enough credible warning, you can just route the order via an exchange. People will prepare positions and jostle to be your counterpart.
Meanwhile Asus, MSI and Lenovo are battling for a share of the handheld pie, while running Windows.
Security Scanners are not supposed to be defensive tools -- they flag what they can find; evaluating the quality of the resources is still the responsibility of the user
Being Dealt a Royal Flush in Poker. NO but pretty close.

Being Born on February 29th. NO
great article, couple of questions

-storing timestamp for each field (user:name) by default seems costly, timestamp can be stored on main key(e.g. user), curious on the thinking..
-is timestamp 64bit? do we need miliseconds?
-what is your sharding architecture, in terms of rage queries
-are your global search indexes on this architecture
Economics and Similar, for the Sleep-Deprived (2005)
Between 138bn with high degree of certainty/low risk and 1.33tn (or bust) with single-stocks, I'd take the 138bn any day. And to change the scale to k/m, I'd take 138k that I know will be there at my old age, than a coin-toss 1.33m (or bust).

Diversification is to (overall) lower your risk and sleep better at night. Otherwise investing solely in single stocks, you could as well go to the races and bet on Land Cookie (an imaginary offspring of Sea Biscuit).

EDIT: hindsight is (always) 20/20.
> The second Iran government has access to nuclear weapons, they're going to nuke Israel

No, they won't.

> and that's not going to be the end of it!

It literally would be, if by “it” you mean “the Islamic Republic of Iran”, because Israel has its own nuclear arsenal.
Right, but you could still get a bit of that frisson of danger, but instead by environmental hazard or robots potentially choking or applying blunt trauma to guests.
It's an "international standard" via both ECMA and the ISO/IEC JTC1. Although ISO in particular seems very pleased that JTC1 exists, this is a terrible way to do technical work, basically the idea is that countries get to agree the world's standards using a democratic process.

But why would countries be the right entities to do this work? They aren't, but there are a conveniently small number of them internationally and there were already bodies to represent them. Specifically they send representatives from their own national standards bodies to the relevant JTC1 sub-sub-committees. Yes that means Taiwan isn't represented.

For situations where there's just a matter of agreeing a few narrow specifics, such as the A-series paper standards, it doesn't really matter how it's done. For a huge problem like "Standardize Word processor application data" it's completely impractical and the results are all you'd expect. Microsoft basically leaned on national representatives from smaller countries to push their pointless vanity standard through both ECMA and subsequently JTC1.

After all that, it's basically futile because of course Microsoft can't magically make their "Office" suite and particularly Word behave in a documented internationally standard way, they don't even know how to describe much of the behaviour except "You know, that's how Word does it". And so, the "Office Open XML" standard has long sections where there's a magic escape hatch for "legacy" documents, which Word uses extensively, and it will always do that.

"Standard" except that yeah, all this non-standard stuff is critical and will be used forever. Futile.
Hasn't Bill Gates spent a large part of his wealth? And has been doing so for 10-20 years?
This is a great point. A numbered account at a US financial institution would presumably be much easier for the US government to execute a warrant against and get the transactions than some adversarial international Hawala network or privacy coin which would be equally in the dark about the target's social security number (if any).
Indeed I would say Linux is as simple as possible given various goals ... however, 'simple as possible' can still be complex!
Do you mean, after picking a million numbers, then every number in the range should have been picked exactly once?
Just bang away at the full keyboard for 50-100 characters?
There's also lifestyle inflation, and of course retiring early rarely impresses your spouse.
Ah, fellow people-pleaser!

For me, what help a lot is reframing feedback, whatever it is, as opportunity for learning, and not something you need to fear, ashamed, or get rid of(to keep face) Embrace it. See it with the eyes of curiosity, and not fear.

Still do your best, yes, but not overly anxious about things you can't control, e.g. what people think.
I have no idea, I find it weird and annoying, yet there's something comforting about watching it. I can't explain it.
Value of life
It doesn't work on various distributions, lots of people disable it because of various issues like it being much slower to start, it can only connect to one backend at a time (which is Canonical's proprietary one) unlike Flatpak, and generally the Linux community has settled on Flatpak and AppImage as the preferred universal packaging formats.
Oh neat, that would absolutely do the job. Just git push and let the gitops do the rest!
Well, they need to fix the back button. When you press back, the original feed is shown and then it promptly updates.

Twitter never caught in a lot of places while threads might have a chance.
> If you're a random terrorist/military group and opposes the west, you will get automatically sponsorship from Iran.

No, you won't.

Now. If you are either an Islamist group opposing Israel specifically, and/or a specifically Shi’a Islamist group opposing Israel or any Sunni-dominated Arab government, then, yes, your odds of getting Iranian support arr pretty good.
removing Mossadegh was the worst thing the US did to Iran, followed by helping the current regime to get into power.
I get your point. But the article is a very interesting read.
> the most reasonable prior "astronauts pick something up that then returns with them intact and is able to survive in highly oxidizing atmosphere" should be near zero

The Soviets had active bioweapons and espionage programs. In a MAD world and with geopolitical dominance at stake, it’s not unreasonable to take precautions against something planted in the lunar module.

Given the demonstrated capabilities and incentives of the actors involved vs. hypothetical AI manifestations, I think it’s way more reasonable to consider moon bugs the greater threat.
It could definitely be clearer, but what makes you say the manual is misleading?
It isn't hard to start writing a new operating system. It is very hard to support that operating system for the next 5 decades.
I hated macOS for gating / crippling dtruss with SIP every time I need to find out what’s wrong with a random cmd.

Is there any alternatives on Mac?
A lottery with 1 million tickets?

Winning ~3-4 times at the roulette when betting on numbers?
Definitely not this. That wouldn't be random at all. For example, after picking 999,999 numbers you would be able to predict the next number with certainty. What it means is that every time you select a number, every number in the range has an equal probability of being selected.
> "Scientists have calculated that the chances of something so patently absurd actually existing are millions to one.
But magicians have calculated that million-to-one chances crop up nine times out of ten."

-- Terry Pratchett

Making fun of the fact that if someone says "it's a million-to-one chance, but it might just work!" in fiction, you know it's going to work.

In _Guards! Guards!_ this is taken to the point that they reckon that it's not enough to hit the dragon with the arrow at the soft spot, they also have to try a whole bunch of improbable circumstances to get the chance to exactly 1 in a million. Because exactly 1 in a million is hard to achieve, as the article shows.
The pdp-11 was also an "octal machine" and it was clear from all the documentation that it was.

When did the switch to hex happen?
With only 2-3hrs of time what can you realistically achieve?
Agree the chart the author chose is awful.

An aot comparison is that China added more wind and solar the past nine months than all of its nuclear reactors under construction will provide. Yes, that includes capacity factor.

https://twitter.com/yo_ean/status/1718633487454904718
According to game theory, you should have empathy but not too much.
Its such a powerful theoretical finding for every aspect of life.
I found it best explained in the Veritasium video on game theory [1]
[1]: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mScpHTIi-kM&pp=ygUfZ2FtZSB0aGV...
yes, but regaining democracy is a hard battle. So, when you destroy it in the first time, it is not a surprise that warlords keep getting control of power till by some random fluctuation, the tide changes. In western world, it took almost 300 years for democracy to be stabilized.

US also helped current regime when it first gained power.
Disappointed there is no photo of what it looked like when it was found. As in a photo of the door at the place it was found before anyone moved it anywhere.
Why "without replacement"? The question doesn't seem to refer to multiple events. For just one event, it doesn't matter if you do with or without replacement, because there is nothing that can be replaced.
Yeah. It's just not quite clear what the minimal example for such a network would be. I assume you have N inputs and one output. The output always active when input 1 is active, otherwise the output is inactive. So the other inputs are ignored. However, when one of those other inputs, x, tends to be temporally correlated with input 1, after a while x will generate an output upon activation even if input 1 isn't active. If x becomes decorrelated with input 1, x will again get ignored. Not sure what the simplest network architecture looks like that implements this behavior.
That they're now a theocracy makes them sincerely calling anyone "satan" an even worse thing to pair with them having nuclear weapons.
“Scientists have calculated that the chances of something so patently absurd actually existing are millions to one.
But magicians have calculated that million-to-one chances crop up nine times out of ten.”
― Terry Pratchett, Mort
The use of unsafe in systems programming languages at very least goes all the way back to ESPOL and NEWP in 1961, with many other cases in between until Rust came to be.
> If we guess a President will serve on average about 6 years, then 1 in 6 times 4.0 million = 24 million babies will someday be President.

This sentence desperately needs parentheses. Took me five minutes to parse correctly.
I have both and the switch has been relegated to stay connected to the tv in case the kids want to play together on it.

Since the steam deck can also play all my switch games plus a lot more, this is what I tend to use and carry around for my personal use. The only problem was installing and letting them know that they can play roblox and minecraft on it so now they constantly want to use it instead of their switch.
How bout this guy

https://images.app.goo.gl/aqh2AP5tj7JBkVKZ9
Famously, the optimal amount of fraud is non-zero. We may yet discover that the amount of fraud in crypto is superior to the fiat systems.

In COVID times governments noticed that freezing bank accounts was an option. Having systems that cannot be subjected to that is wise; even if it involves high costs.
Can you give more details on your background as a DevOps/Systems Engineer? What languages you do know, what experience do you have?
Maybe some customer support? Development of prototypes and non-urgent functions?
Should have been more precise, the top position got returns of 10X (1000%) the market’s index return, meaning that congressperson “earned” $10 for every $1 the market gained, while the worst position got returns of 2X (200%) or $2 for every $1.

The key thing is that of 100 trading members of Congress -of which not one (I believe) is a professional, full-time stock trader — 33% beat the SPY, and that this has been consistently true… the average professional, full-time trader can’t consistently do that.

You might not see evidence of fire, but I definitely see evidence of smoke.
Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me.

They used a small team to build an app in 5 months that handled going from 0 to 100 mil users in 5 days.

Doesn’t sound neither lots of money and engineering, or false idea if it had 100 mil signups in 5 days.