skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Lying and hallucinations would be accurate with the way people treated computers before “AI”
ever existed. Intentional reckless disregard for truth is a form of lying.

You don’t have to worry about the legal sphere anthropomorphising software. Software is legally not a person and therefore will not be treated as one by the courts, regardless of how people commonly refer to it.
> If you need the interaction to fully resolve (as in the state is updated and the success or failure of the interaction is visible to the user) within 800ms or so, then it shouldn't be performed over the network.

Most real-world SPA sites perform a lot more roundtrips over the network than the MPA equivalent, not less. And every roundtrip adds yet another 800ms to your update latency, plus the risk that some random network failure will break the SPA state update and force you to reload it from scratch.
Keila is another one with similar features plus a visual (block) editor for designing the email template/content: https://github.com/pentacent/keila
That doesn't render it useless. It means that citations are have additional utility.

Further, LLMs do not only spit quotes. They engage in analytic and synthetic knowledge.
Is that not what Thunderbird is (amongst other things)?
"We put a speed bump at the dangerous crossing to prevent accidents, but they made a car that has more suspension so that they can still cross it at almost the same speed."
> If I learn to write news articles by reading the NYT, I’m not then able to duplicate myself infinitely and fill every role at every news publisher. I am but one human, producing one human’s output and consuming one human’s space within whatever pursuit I undertake. Critically, I still leave room for others to do the same thing.

This is a luddite argument that can equally apply to any automation. A robotic arm can be trained to do the same thing a human line worker does, but the robotic arm can be copied infinitely and work 24/7 leaving zero room for other humans to do the same thing. Should we ban robotic arms?
If you lump everyone who checks a box into a group, and apply a bunch of labels to that group by default, you’re going to find it hard to see the diversity and nuance of people.

It’s also a pretty unkind thing to do in general.

As for whether this take is true, I’d check to see if FIRE already has this case on their radar. It’s my understanding that, as a free speech absolutionist organization, they frequently represent cases like these.
You need to use your own AWS account.
Some of these claims seem outlandish as rationalizations, do you have any evidence or data upholding these claims? I’m not sure how sexual frustration, homosexuality, and the military connect, especially we have the old literature of the Iliad where a famous band of men and their lovers fight.
This is good news. The keyboard lawsuit should start seeing payments in 2024 hopefully!

https://www.keyboardsettlement.com/
Firefox Sync would work perfectly for most users, without the need to spin up a server or host data on the cloud.
Because they would have had a class action suit for selling phones that only last a year or so.

It is far easier to notice a phone that dies in you than something as vague as it progressively becoming slower.

It looks to me they simply hoped nobody would notice it was intentional.
The massive body of corporate law shows how false this statement is.
I think the reason monks have a (reported) 100% success rate is because they've perfected explanation/mentoring for many generations. Obviously, someone on HN paraphrasing an article they saw once isn't going to have the same effect.

I still see the irony, though. "it works 100% of the time, for 1% of people!" So it works 1% of the time then?

Knowing these things hasn't helped me at all in life, btw. It's just some trivia.
The old XC60 can do 50km on 9.1kWh of battery - that’s 18kWh per 100km - IMO that’s super optimistic for an SUV of that size (and assumes no heating, AC, lights etc), but let’s assume it holds.

The BYD can do 180km on a 50kWh battery, that’s 28kWh per 100km.

How did you arrive at 5x worse? It’s not even 2x worse. And again, I don’t buy the 50km claim from Volvo, outside of perfect conditions (eg daytime in May, no rain, no AC, low air resistance).
Archaeologists Find 3k-Year-Old Sword Well Preserved
But all that stuff about "software can't marry" etc doesn't change the point that we need to make decisions about what behaviour is acceptable for software, and it makes sense to base those decisions on what is already considered acceptable by the humans using the software. I just don't see how personhood comes into it and I feel like that's a hyperbolic interpretation of what they're saying.
When I worked on something related-enough a few jobs ago, I was surprised when our legal dept said that google (and pinterest) generally doesn't have a legal leg to stand on with regards to that kind of thing, but since they link to the thing they're quoting/copying, they have a relatively symbiotic relationship. If you sue google into delisting you, you end up with less traffic, so you don't sue.
I have been using sendy for an year now. While it does have most of the features one would need, it starts to choke. I have a mailing list with 700k subscribers and it's been a pain to use sendy.
That doesn't answer the question. The question is: what sets it apart from Dr. King's use of a functionally identical term? Dalewyn specifically named Dr. King as the "good" point in a timeline that ends on the bad "calling people people of color."
Yeah, I'm certainly not against 99% solutions if we can get them, and my original comment was pretty much inspired by things like the WPA.
You mentioned it yourself: A nomadic lifestyle.

I am perfectly happy lending a hand to friends and family for whom the sky decided now was their turn to get dropped on. Shit happens to the best of us.

But that's a different story to enabling someone's lifestyle. My hospitality doesn't extend that far, let alone generosity.

Unless you're somehow insinuating that being homeless is a lifestyle, which I would vehemently disagree with. Even if there was (and there probably is) a lifestyle that doesn't involve a home, it's most certainly not called being homeless.
Sorry, I didn't focus on mobile compatibility. Will work on that in next iterations. Thanks
At least in some android phones the term factory reset is misleading. If you "only" factory reset, you will need to have access to the original Google account to use the phone afterwards. If you want to sell your phone you need to first disconnect it from your account and then factory reset it.

This is done to prevent selling of stolen phones but due to the bad naming it can be a hassle for legitimate sellers. The website seems not to mention this. At least in the phones I checked.
Oxidizing C++
I don't really use social media (no Facebook, twitter etc.) and have not kept up well with the various new technologies and terms in the field (e.g. mastodon etc.). But I use Firefox and like Mozilla so I am interested in what this is. But to the untrained eye, what is it? It looks a bit like Twitter.

I think the information shown via the small "About" link (bottom right) should be more prominent on the main page. At least some of it - to explain what this site is.
Aren’t those kind of st odds? How do you have rich characters when you totally remove one of, maybe the biggest, cause of real
World conflict.
We only need to wait as long as it takes you to find, read and understand my first six words here.
Tell your government to create an electronic mail service that you log into using your ID for all your government communication. Spam doesn't exist there.
To be fair, the term "world model" does not presume scientific understanding, factfullness or causality.

In an ideal AI model this would be the aim though.
I wonder if you have tried Haxe with a framework such as Heaps or Haxeflixel. I wonder why Haxe doesn't get more recognition.

Monogame (C#) or LibGDX (Java/Kotlin) could also be good options and both are very mature and tested.
> But the typical well-insured US mother-to-be doesn’t spend a moment thinking about that difference vs., say, the reported quality of the food.

Your definition of "typical" apparently is very different from my own, or we are thinking about "well insured" very differently. Every pregnant person that I've ever talked to, if they have a choice at all, has weighed the projected cost heavily in their decision on where to give birth.

The typical person in the US has a deductible that runs well past several thousand dollars and then they have to pay a coinsurance amount, which could be up to 25% of the cost, up to absurdly high out of pocket maxes.
Sure, its an interesting goal but it does not seem anywhere near a this-decade deliverable.

I'm also less convinced about having all my chores done half-a**sed for $30k up front cost. A $30k investment every 10 years is either going to cost the buyer interest when they finance the purchase, or foregone returns/interest if they keep the lump sum invested. So the true cost is more like $45k. Further, it's now a device you own and are responsible for maintenance/charging/etc I am sure. So now we are talking I dunno, maybe $50k.

And at that price .. $30-50k per decade, you could outsource a subset of your chores to specialists to do 100% of the job, and leave yourself with the subset you don't mind.

$3k is in the ballpark for an annual yard work budget even in HCOL areas. For $5k annually you could probably outsource your laundry entirely with some light housecleaning.

Or you know, find the neighborhood teen (or your own) and see how many $20s it takes to get them to clear your driveway / do your yardwork.
Current AI discourse has made me realize that there is quite the dichotomy between people who see humans as nothing more than biological machines that will soon be obsoleted by synthetic machines, and people who see humans (as Kant would say) as an end.

I think that it's sad that the leading AI labs seem to mostly be run by people in the former camp. It doesn't have to be this way.
Stream gets faster fixes in general, but yeah for embargoed security fixes it goes the other way around

Even if you are Meta. The only trick we use is something anyone can do - hotfix it in Hyperscale, or download the Stream fix as soon as a signed build is available without waiting for it to be fully released
To pile on to what another commenter said above, therapy is for you.

I know you dismissed it out of hand. You clearly have no faith that someone (specifically, a well-trained therapist) might have something valuable to contribute.

However, while your powers of observation might border on superhuman, they are still very much just yours. A therapist can help you build an emotional toolset you will not otherwise provide yourself, and which will make you a more complete person, not least of all in the area of building and maintaining meaningful interpersonal relationships.

Think of it like this: you can read music theory and memorize the entire western classical canon by heart and still be a terrible piano player, never improving if you don’t show up to practice at the keys with a talented teacher.

One simply cannot reason ones way around the emotional core that drives us as humans.

CBT will help you change your behavior and how things feel, but, imho, psychodynamic psychotherapy can go much deeper and truly improve your emotional IQ.
Other than DMARC, SPF and DKIM?
I understand where you’re coming from, but I’m more so pushing back on the added cost and complexity of human elements NOT required by the built environment, or are even detrimental to it even acting like a human.

There are not many tasks that require a neck for example. Or a whole head really. This robot feels like it’s designed with a shape in mind first.

The dexterity and wobblyness is actually pretty unimpressive in this example, compared to Atlas, which absolutely feels closer to the full range of human dexterity and physical ability.

Atlas is still general purpose. It’s just built with human tasks in mind first, rather than a human shape.
The language says “including” which means these mentioned types of sources and potentially other sources that don’t sound as good written down so are left out.
Brain did not evolve in an environment with lightbulbs to extend daylight hours.
By this logic, calling people white is racist. White as an identity is completely arbitrary and seems to shift to change who it includes and excludes every few decades. It's a meaningless term that generalizes a vast and diverse array of cultures.

>> "Racism is considering someone's race for something where race is not relevant, the intent behind the act is irrelevant."

The people who popularized the term to describe themselves certainly didn't think it was irrelevant.
Where has it been documented? What is the evidence?
Try this as I am the same YMMV: get an eye mask and do 4-10 mins of deep “belly” breathing (5s inhale through the nose, 10s exhale through the mouth, though I prefer exhale through the nose.
People deal OK with mangos, rambutan, and pomegranates -- those are all heavily seeded or complicated to eat, but they show up in grocery stores. I think the storage and shipping is the main issue.
Transform medical and research papers into knowledge bases with paperetl
My biggest pet peeve with typescript is how it never explains most of this stuff officially.

The docs try to dumb things down but in my opinion it just makes it harder to understand these more complex pieces. Like the article mentions, the typescript handbook no longer even mentions the term homomorphic!

After working with typescript heavily for a few years I kind of had a bit of an intuition for some of the details here, but the article helped finally explain it in a way that I can truly understand.
What protocol is it based on and where is it documented?
Being ignorant means you’re in the dark. Ignorance can be charming; a child is largely ignorant, as is a dog.
Will it be cross origin? If so I think there are other issues.
Spaghetti/bucatini/pasta straws are the solution.
>partial renders and / or DOM morphs of server generated HTML responses, eliminating the full-page refresh effect. www.mcmaster.com seems to utilize this to some degree, actually - while yes there are JSON responses, there are what appear to be HTML partial responses as well that are presumably injected on the page.

Uhm... yes?!? The behavior you listed is exactly why I gave you that McMaster example. So I guess I'm a little confused. In any case, your comment matches up with the wikipedia definition of SPA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-page_application):

>A single-page application (SPA) is a web application or website that interacts with the user by dynamically rewriting the current web page with new data from the web server, instead of the default method of a web browser loading entire new pages. The goal is faster transitions that make the website feel more like a native app.

An alternate way of interpreting your reply to me is if you also categorize McMaster's website behavior as a form of "MPA". In other words, you classify McMaster's loading of new HTML fragments and rewriting DOM as "multiple pages". I've not heard others define MPA in this way.

>, everything on that search engine would be trivially accomplished using a server rendered HTML approach without needing to utilize a SPA. It's actually a great example of something that would work great with progressive enhancement - the search bar can start as a simple input that leads to full page search results, the navigation can do a full page refresh

Yes, we've already agreed about it being technically trivial. The issue is end user's preferred UI experience. Users don't want the "page refresh/reload" even though it's trivial.
Probably doing something that is too stimulating. Watching TV, reading, playing games, etc.
I mean Japan was a decade ahead of us there
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_(robot)

I don't know that replacing $15/hr at-will labor with a $50k machine that can be vandalized/stolen/etc is going to have a great cost-benefit for most US retailers...
Due to broken batteries, becoming broken after a short period of time, so to avoid recalling phones
The legal question should be around: Does open AI make any guarantees about the content and their validity? Is the output considered property of OpenAI? You can’t train on it, so does that mean it’s their property? This is the most important question.

For example, if you were to hire a group of writers, ghost writers to be specific, to re-create someone else’s work, then publish it yourself as your own who is at fault? Who gets sued? Is it you who directed the writers to do the work or is it the writers who did the work?

So if we accept this model, the owner/onus is on the prompter to not re-create copyrighted works.

(Albeit an assumption that the writers are unaware to some extent)
There’s not really a point. It’s just weird to me seeing people deeply illiberal things call themselves “liberals” even though I know that it’s because the word “liberal” has a meaning in the US that has very little to do with classical liberalism and that’s just how it goes sometimes.
Command +.

Supporting / allowing Reader Mode would be good.
> Computers are not humans.

And? Why does that invalidate either of your two examples? You need to answer "why not GPT?" with something more substantial than "because it's not a human."
If only they can add RSS support and newsletter subscriptions backed by Firefox Relay in Pocket, it can actually become a whole lot more useful.

If you need something like this today, try Omnivore[1]. Their RSS support is a bit wonky but very promising.

[1]: https://omnivore.app
I have less optimism. The article says NYT was trying to negotiate with microsoft and openai for licensing, so they may be inclined to settle ("just give us a zillion bucks a year and we're cool"). And if they don't settle, then questions like this often seem to be decided by technicalities that don't really matter to all the similar observers hoping for a broader ruling.
This the highest settlement of actual cash I’ve seen in my life. Normally the settlements end up being less than $10 with the lawyers taking the lions share and not worth replying to to avoid disclosing my SSN to a possible fraudster. I guess I should have sent in my claim for this!
Yes I agree - the (2017) tag in the title doesn't seem right here given the update.
I mean, there's a whole industry dedicated to preventing abuse of computing resources exposed to the internet. You basically opened your MongoDB instance to the world - you are lucky they haven't already stored anything horribly illegal in there.
This dude wants to, and I quote the article, "dedicate his career to improving China's underdevelopment of the application of advances to point-of-care technology in the field of public health".

He's not being denied that because anyone objects to his aims. The problem seems to be his parents, culture and where his family comes from. Now I'll agree with you that the standard for racism is a bit fuzzy these days, but this is clearly going to meet the bar for being called "racist" when it comes to a university education in North America.
>There's a reason Amazon wanted to build HQ2 at NYC & NOVA

To quote Contact: "First rule in government spending: why build one when you can have two at twice the price?" They were likely given so much in tax incentives from local local and state governments that building 2 HQ2s was less than what one would have cost Amazon on its own. Furthermore, it makes sense to want to have HQs in both the Financial and Federal Government centers of the US.
Does anyone have a cite that Apple knowingly created the issue they were dealing with here?

1. iPhones have the ability to burst-use a lot of energy
2. Older batteries aren't able to produce the same voltage as fresh batteries
3. Apple throttles performance on older iPhones to prevent them shutting down completely by demanding more power than the battery is able to deliver.
4. Apple doesn't explain to anyone what they're doing.

2 is just physics/chemistry
3 and 4 are a mild misstep.

So my question is: did Apple know ahead of time that they were designing phones that would age out of functionality and require this workaround? Or did they design phones that operated at peak functionality when new, and then a few years later realize the consequences of that design decision as the phones got older, and then take a perfectly reasonable course to handle the situation as well as possible, and only screw up in not telling people what they were doing?
>If it was so easy to prove it would be enforced

What makes you think that?
I think this is a testament to how close the US is to losing its place of power in the world. People don't believe in the country, they don't want to risk their lives defending it, because they think going into the military is the same as signing your life away to a corporation. Of course, the US might be on the verge of a civil war, if it happens in February or November or January, regardless people are tired of what "democracy" has given them.

You know, I remember maybe a decade ago, maybe more recently I can't quite remember, there was this idea out of the Incel community that was treated as ridiculous at the time: that the state should force men and women into couples to make families, so that nobody would be alone. And as terrible as that sounds, it sounds like a better social model than what America has today, and is probably why states that are closer in form to that model (far-right islamic nationalist) are gaining so much power. It just shows how terrible things have gotten because there used to be real sexual freedom, alongside social mobility and an egalitarian society, but no longer, and people are so dissatisfied they'd be willing to allow a dictator to come to power.
Perhaps because they can reuse the robots for a thousand types of tasks so they don't have to reinvent the wheel every time? Also much cheaper that way.
Nice. ListMonk is by the CTO of a very popular company in India, Zerodha. Another of his tool is right now on the top of HackerNews - DNS.Toys - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38899290
Very interesting. what is your tech stack?
The article is about people (as a corporate legal entity) being sued for things people did when creating something. ChatGPT, the software, is not being sued. It can't be sued. It's software. It's not a person that can be taken to court. It can't be held liable.

(I heavily edited this comment after realizing I could make the point in far fewer words. Sorry.)
>The worst part is the chronic thinking that I could've/should've/would've done something amazing, if a single shit had been given at any point along the way. Such a waste of human potential.

Fixation on how your present circumstances might be better if not for the wrong done by others to the extent that you describe it as a severe and chronic issue is neither inescapable nor particularly factual.
At least in PA, having a disability (I'd assume MS with motor difficulties would qualify) makes it pretty straightforward, based on my experience. Like most government interaction, there's lots of paperwork, but the employees administering it are generally helpful, competent, and pleasant.

I'm sure the bar is higher without a disability, but the asset tests in PA are reasonable, considering they exempt your residence and 1 vehicle.

There's probably horror stories of people falling through cracks, but I just find it disingenuous when people breathlessly proclaim that the US callously let's people die on the street from a loss of employer health care.
Fair use is a key defense for OpenAI.

The article also mentions the idea that the model is merely extracting (uncopyrightable) facts, which is interesting, but might be a tough one to prove since LLMs have no way of establishing what are facts, and don't return facts by design.