skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They are just that - philosophies. I live my life based on first-hand experience only, not the musings of a professor or even a poet. And I'm sorry to say it is as follows: not all people deserve compassion, nor patience. Most of the people I've come across in life are plainly stupid by choice, and a stupid person is the most dangerous kind.

On the other hand, individuals with special needs, children and animals are mostly defenseless in this world and actually deserve our attention. I have focused my time and resources on helping them (versus the family and friends "in need") and this has proven to be more fulfilling, and I believe ultimately more selfless than my past self.
My project civboot.org was spun out of similar concerns. I don't have the political power to change any of the issues you raised, but I can rebuild a simpler yet usable tech stack that could be the basis of a new educational program.
Sure the moon is barren and useless but then so is Antarctica or large chunks of the ocean floor or really most of the earth's surface. That isn't a green light to ignore the consequences and let people treat it as their backyard.

The moon is also, unlike Mars and other similar bodies, immediately accessible to us (by many, many orders of magnitude of distance and effort).

And "it's just one ship/urn/container" is never really a good argument because it is always going to scale up exponentially. So we need to treat it less like a trash dump and more a valuable scientific (and maybe eventually tourist) preserve.
How much ultraprocessed food are you eating?
& Screen tech, possibly camera sensors/lenses — going beyond the original scope of the post, but still.
Yes, if I was a perfectly reasonable and logical robot, I'd agree with you.

But I'm a 30+ year old human, with plenty of experiences that "should never have happened" and "that was once in a million odds" that I won't risk it.

I'd love it if I could turn off the lizard parts of my body, but I cannot. I try my best, but when it comes to life/death, I just trust my gut over anything else.
huh I thought it was Golgotha, but apparently Calvary is the Latin name for the place and Golgotha the Greek. funny that I've never heard of Calvary.
In my experience, the loose group of acquaintances is actually really good at getting support from, so long as you aren't a taker and are generally in good standing.
Completely unrelated. You’re still not using dvds with source packages.
My ASUS Radeon HD 5850 Cypress Pro is still going strong! Never any issue ever in the years I've had it.
No. It’s just that people want to vote with their feet, and inflict damage to Boeing for abhorrent behavior.

I mean not even every army general in every country has killed as many as Boeing.
The most expertise in fracking and massive natural gas reserves. US is the fourth leading oil exporter and second for natty gas, even though most gas importers are far away. The US has also developed the most advanced petrochemical processing techniques to take advantage of all the gas.
Tembo.io: "Transparent Pricing"

The only 'price' i can find on the site is the 'Try Free' button, which leads to a login form...

Not helpful.
After the Lion Air and Ethiopia Arlines crashed, the FAA calculated that on average, the Max fleet would suffer a fatal incident once every 2 years and that was based on the existing number of craft.

That's such an unbelievably ridiculous number to ignore. People saying this is insignificant are really putting their blinders on and I don't know why.
It would be enormous. Getting airlines to buy from even medium-sized aerospace companies is a challenge. Bombardier couldn't sell its CSeries over fears that it would not be around for the multi-decade lifespan of the plane. Same plane under Airbus is a hot commodity.
I am usually a very practical person but looking at the catastrophic failures specifically of 737 MAX and not one but many in short period, it is way too many for a plane. Yes planes crash but the probability is extremely low in general except for 737 MAX. Officially it is now on my no fly list. I will not board a plane if it is 737 MAX. And yes, I will suffer the consequences of that.
> How are they able to find the talent? Unlike most other common languages, it is magnitudes more difficult to ramp up entry level new hires in Rust

They have not found this to be true.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38869786
From what I heard is that Boeing does the final assembly , they get that door out and put it back in, then at the end pressurize the interior to 1.5X the normal pressure and test the plane. Since this also was a new plane I do not see how Boeing can find a different scapegoat.
> Can a modern phone contact a BT device without being manually paired (assuming it has cooperating software on the phone)?

Yes. I manage IOT apps for android and iOS that do exactly this. You can write/read data to any bluetooth device around you that is advertising as connectable and has a GATT characteristic that supports it.
I've seen enough people put their lives and careers on indefinite pause to take care of sick relatives to know this isn't universally true.

Bad friends do exist, but so do good ones, and I suspect treating everyone as bad-by-default is a good way to become one of the bad ones yourself.
Arti 1.1.12 supports Tor's onion service
OpenDev is a collaboratory for open source software development at scale
Is it just chips? Because their consumer appliance division seems to have huge problems. I bought a fridge and it was fully dead in under 6 months. I was able to get a full refund because they lost a class action lawsuit, but it's crazy how bad their appliances are, I don't trust samsung for anything, also:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2023/10/2....
From what I've noticed, the touch-friendly replacement for tooltips, for elements like form entry, is the info icon (the circle with the i in it). I actually find this to be even more useful than the tooltip (when space allows) because I know there is more context I can get at a glance.
Yep, just switch the calendar to "public" and you can just use it with any CalDav client or icalendar libraries like https://github.com/pat/calendav. Nothing hacky about that, just a standard.
Wails: Build beautiful cross-platform applications using Go
I really feel this sort of tech is only the beginning imagine a AI, with a vector db for each user that builds on their history, and then you tie that into a random persona generator that generates daily routines/events that randomly happen so the AI has things to talk about with the user to "simulate her life", and then go a step further and add realtime TTS like elevenlabs (or whatever the next gen opensource version of that ends up being)
They made that argument about Safari, but did they win? I cannot find a news article about the outcome of the argument.
We do, and there has been one death due to an incident on a major U.S. airline since November 2001.

You can maybe argue two, where a woman was killed after exiting an Asiana plane after it crashed at SFO. She was hit by an emergency vehicle responding to the scene.
> I’d be surprised if it’s even $5 a month for many of them.

I doubt it is even that, or close, if you take any average reading.

> I don’t understand why some of these small blogs on niche topics even have ads.

I think in many cases they have the ads there just in case one day they randomly get mentioned in a high-profile place, get a pile of traffic, and that makes them an amount in ad revenue worth caring about. Of course, they probably underestimate the effect of such a glut of traffic, most likely their site will grind to a halt long before much ad revenue is totted up, and their “15 minutes” will be over before it is back up again.

In some cases it is simply that they've chosen to host somewhere “free” where they have little or no control over the ad content, and probably never see a penny of any revenue from it (the host takes that in exchange for the “free” services).
P14s (AMD) is what the article is discussing.
> it's made by Spirit AeroSystems which also makes components for Airbus

So, how then is Boeing rewarded with this website and Airbus not if they are using the same supplier?

Next step will be a plugin that filters these 737max from Kayak.
If any other mode of transportation were nearly as dangerous as roadways in the US, it would be made illegal. The fact is that the 737 MAX has, by its own flaws, killed hundreds of people in recent memory. People don't want to deal with this clearly cursed line of airplanes at all.
How many cars had their door fall off? More general, how many of those 40k were caused by defects in the car?
I read “actual” as modifying “concern” to the extent that it is a concern about something that carries real risk, not a concern that isn’t a real risk.
There is pleeeenty of mission critical stuff written in Python, for which interpreter speed is a primary concern. This has been true for decades. Maybe not in your industry, but there are other Python users.
It is trivial to see how someone sitting there not seat belted could have perished. You do understand that long stretches of flight allow you to be unseatbelted right?
Eh, I could see this but I think having well-structured data will still be useful for both cutting down on 'prompt clutter' and giving it a better chance to come up with something useful.

It might get better in later versions but even so, I think passing well-structured data will always result in cleaner output than passing it data with lots of noise.

If we are going to work alongside AGIs, we should consider them equal to humans and by that I mean, passing them good data rather than assuming they'll figure out what we meant. Obviously it won't be _as_ big of an issue or requirement but if you can put into such a format, why wouldn't you?
You should be able to get 70% of the 5.6Gbps in an ideal situation. 320Mhz Channel with 6Ghz standing in direct line of sight with no obstacle. Roughly 3.92Gbps.

So while I agree with a lot of other comment you will highly unlikely push the 2.5Gbps Ethernet in real world scenario. I would still have love to see it come with 5Gbps Ethernet. Which to be fair still hasn't gotten enough attention.
I don’t want innovation that comes at the expense of human lives. The same thing is going on with self driving cars right now. It is wild to me that they aren’t required to follow the same regulations as airliners.

The safety record of commercial airliners should be help up as an example of how the system works. It’s proof that we can set aside corporate greed and design systems that are safe if we want to. The way that Boeing has gone downhill and the FAA has allowed it to happen is shameful.
Why is 737 MAX having so many issues then ? In a short period of time since 2019, it had way too many incidents for an aircraft. I am never flying 737 MAX and yes I am a very practical person.
As a valley neighbour I'd be interested in an update when the time comes.
The industry is littered with defunct companies that couldn't financially afford to spend ten+ years bringing a new design to market. It took nearly 14 years to bring the 787 to market, what company can afford a timeline like that? This is more the norm than the exception. Innovation is massively stifled in aviation.

> That is more of an argument for stricter requirements around automobiles and that entire industry than anything else.

I agree that cars should, and could, be safer. But my argument was about the reaction people have to accidents. In cars we have several orders of magnitude more deaths and we don't bat an eye at that but in aviation we have a scary incident and it is wall to wall coverage.
> but for devs passionate about programming languages, python is a relic they hope vanish

If you asked me what language I would consider to be a relic that I hope would vanish, I'd go with Perl.
I mean cool but... but really wasn't expecting shoving an eink tablet in a frame lol, was excited for a new big eink display with esp32 or raspi
> A lot of companies use SaaS tools and deploy tools they don't own on their private cloud that they have to wait on patches for

Dont forget ~ 85% of global compute is still on-premise stuff.

> With budgets tightening, tougher scrutiny of security and increasing threats, companies need automation in remediation.

Yes, but the main bulk of vulns for enterprises and SMB+ (as in, the orgs that actually do security spending) are in products they don't own the codebase of. Windows, Redhat, Cisco, Confluence, Jenkins, and more recently also solutions like Okta, Forgerock and others are getting exploited via vulns for the benefit of attackers.

I'm not trying to be a dick btw, but I think you're confusing the market you're trying to play in. You're selling something closer to a dev tool than a security tool, and talking about detection and such doesn't really concern this area.
In a brand new plane? Yes it is.
my wife is a teacher and has shared anecdotally it feels like kids' attention spans are way worse recently, even in 2nd and 3rd grade. Reminds me of this tweet: https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1734615155009376333

i does feel like there's a shift happening — people waking up to the addiction. I've been thinking of going full on "dumb phone" but i rely on my phone so much for work, the only thing that seems to work is blocking social media usage and doom scrolling.
> people want to vote with their feet, and inflict damage to Boeing for abhorrent behavior

People want to express outrage. That’s understandable.

Most flight revenue is from frequent travellers, and they understand the business enough to know histrionics won’t change Boeing’s incumbency. A couple people who fly twice a year swapping airlines isn’t going to move the needle. And I doubt a material fraction of them are likely voters who would bother their electeds about this.
How do you use c++ in Godot?

GDExtention?
One thing I can never understand about people who work in tech complaining about Marxist labor exploitation: why don't you start your own business? I've had multiple coworkers who are into this leftist stuff, and I know they have orders of magnitude more money than it takes to buy the capital equipment needed to run the exact business they work for, given that they've been making a tech salary for years and computers are incredibly cheap. By their own estimate, they have the skills and understanding necessary to create the product themselves. So why don't they do it?

My intuition is that the missing "surplus value" exists within the answer to that question.
Where do the aol users fit? Part of the early app crowd?
But, we're seeing fatal issues with one specific company over and over again. Knowing that there is some systemic failure within Boeing must change your priors, no?

What's wrong with pointing that out and being concerned?
Nvidia just happens to be making mining picks during a gold rush. They also happened to be making mining picks during the previous gold/silver rush, mostly propped up by ETH PoW algo.

It's a wild world, but NVDA also happened to be an extreme outlier in terms of hitting 2 gold rushes in a row.
To be fair, the original comment was about piston engine powered aircraft. These would really need either a separate compressor/blower or a complicated modification of the exhaust system.
> Some might say that if all it takes is cash to catch up your moat then you don't have a moat.

Well the amount of cash matters. With infinite cash you could take on and surpass pretty much any company you want.

But it has to be an amount of cash where the ROI makes sense.
What happened to the Peregrine lander and what does it mean for moon missions?
One of the most beautiful planes ever built IMHO (in how futuristic it still looks) :)
I totally understand, but I don't really know the answer. Men who are more aggressive (in an appropriate or inappropriate manner) tend to be more successful.

So, as a man, your options are to:

1. Ask fewer women out so that you are more respectful. This likely means you'll have less success dating.

2. Ask more women out, even in environments that might be uncomfortable, e.g. a server, co-worker, etc. They're going to have more success dating.

Again, I totally understand this sucks for women, but men don't have great options here either.
Why has it taken so much longer for CPython to get a JIT than, say, PyPy? I would imagine the latter has far less engineering effort and funding put into it.
1. The seat was not destroyed.
2. The door blowing off would not be the only reason; a second reason would be that the person failed to wear the seatbelt.
> An issue happened

IIRC three issues happened
What's the evidence for weakening FAA regulation?

EDIT: I'm getting downvoted, but I really am curious. It's extremely uncommon for government bureaucracy to roll back regulations, and as far as I can tell from some Googling, the FAA has not done so. So what regulations are being weakened?
I'd love to hear from people interested in a device like this to get an understanding of what they'd imagine doing with it. I'm pretty far removed from the world of hardware hacking, so my imagination is limited. Is the completely open nature of the device more about principle, or is it enabling users to do interesting things with it that they can't do with other devices (e.g. Framework Laptop or a standard Raspberry Pi)?
What's the point of maintaining a website when the big search engines (Google) hides them under tons of SEO crap? You find information on social media now. And that's worse than how you used to find information in search. I've given up hope for the web.
And Delta has an outstanding order for 100 of them, with delivery scheduled throughout 2025. We'll see if these continued incidents alter that, but I think the inertia is that this is what boeing selling these days. Everyone will have them.
What do you mean "if", anyone can choose what plane to fly on anytime.
I was hoping this website would tell me how to identify a 737 Max from the inside or from my gate. Trust but verify.
Boeing manager I imagine?
In Seattle (since Boeing was the largest employer in the state until Amazon succeeded them), there was a common line:

"if it's not Boeing, I'm not going"
(See '79 bumper sticker: https://www.ebay.com/itm/332131135342)

Starting to look like it might be the other way around...
Stateful Hot-Reload/REPL Workflows that I used/use:
I have used Emacs+Jupyter in the past, also played around with Jurigged, and currently I use the 'Send to Repl' functionality available in PyCharm.

Still, there are rough edges,

1. Rough: No (ergonomic) expression-evaluation available at the moment, hopefully tree-sitter based tools will solve this in the future.

2. Rougher: In the general case, I can't redefine a function/class. The 'global' namespace can be used to 'some extent' to achieve 'deterministic redefinition', but the code strays away from idiomatic Python.

3. Roughest: I have found Python performance to always be a concern. Maybe I am biased towards C/C++/Rust for performance purposes, aka Optimal Resource Utilization.
I think the parent comment's point is: if this were affecting a version of Google-branded Chrome with similar market share, do you think we would still be getting "next update in 12 hours"?

I remember an internal mantra in Google along the lines of "if you break something in production, roll back first, ask questions about how it happened later, even if you think it's a simple fix". It feels telling that this is not what is happening in this circumstance.
It doesn't find my European flight.
A relief doesn't make you happy though. It just makes you not stressed. IME there's totally a plateau where you realise more money just means more expensive toys with minimal increase in actual fulfilment or happiness.
What is your data source?
Maybe relevant blogpost is https://devblogs.microsoft.com/python/python-311-faster-cpyt... dated Oct 2022.
The team behind this and some other recent improvements to Python are at Microsoft.
I think the x86 "standardized architecture" is an example of Conway's law: it's a natural outgrowth of the way the x86 hardware ecosystem evolved, with CPU, motherboard, and "card" manufacturers all being different companies that need formal standards to enable post-production integration (first by dedicated system builders setting DIP switches; then later at runtime with "plug and play"); and with each party being incentivized to swap out partners / "commoditize their complement", and therefore wanting constrained standards that ensure that they can design/code once to the standard's spec, and then switch suppliers without re-work.

Other architectures that came into existence more recently — ARM mainly, but possibly RISC-V is going this way as well — are mainly employed to produce integrated devices in a more supply-chain-oriented way, with vendors producing and licensing designs for "IP cores", and then device integrators combining these "IP cores" to fab SoCs.

Conway's Law (and game theory) predict that such an arrangement would have no need for API standards. It's pretty hard to force an ecosystem to do something, when they have no natural incentive to do it.
The Varjo doesn’t have an external display or a real-time processor, and those are just two examples.
> My experience is that designers want users to admire the UI, as opposed to use it.

This is a biased generalization, like "engineers are nerds that don't like to interact with other people." Which is wrong.

I work as head of UX, and my career path started in computer science, and I became more interested in user interfaces.

Today's UI results from the legacy of designers from diverse backgrounds (like Alan Cooper, Brendan Laurel, Larry Tesler, Donald Norman, Maeda, and many anonymous ones who worked on successful products).

No matter what the background is, most designers care about usability.

But where does the prejudice of "designers only care about visuals" come from?

Many founders, CEOs, CTOs, etc; the people defining a product don't have a background in product design. That influences the hiring and company structure.

When you hire a designer only by its visual portfolio or outsource a crucial part of your product experience to an agency with the mandate of "make it look pretty." That's what you get: a pretty-looking but shallow UI.
You can see that on Behance and Dribble: most of the designs are nice-looking dashboards that are useless. The intention is to show the visuals because understanding user needs and defining the information architecture is unattractive (and takes more time).

The core of the problem is what we understand by design.

If you want to create a good product, design is the result of the work of many people. It includes testing ideas, re-working things that don't work well, and interacting with many roles in the company to understand the business and the technical constraints. It requires a lot of collaboration.
People like Steve Jobs are often praised because doing those things requires leaders who see that as a priority. But that's rare. Most leaders would love top-notch product experiences but underestimate the work needed.

If you see design only as the result that a designer handed you in Figma to enter into a mini-waterfall process, then yes, the result is probably a UI designed to be admired and not used. Because that's the output, your organization asks for the designer role.
very nice.
Years ago I did something like this with an old broken-but-working macbook for showing photos and cinemagraphs in a frame. Similar matte, but I added a webserver so it would run offline.
We'll have to agree to disagree. I don't believe in blaming the user for manufacturing and maintenance errors. I think that makes a bad programmer too, actually.
HN is good at critiquing fonts and typography.