skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
yeah, I've been working working on https://golivecosmos.com/ but recently learned that editors also hate searching stock music libraries for their projects. Curious if people want something like this.
So you’re in favor of the government being able to kill a company? For instance 3Ms PFAS debacle has resulted in enough death and sickness that any person would face life in prison or death depending on where the trial took place. If we’re giving corporations constitutional protections, we should also give them the punishment we’d give an individual for their actions.

You can’t have it both ways.
How would it collapse? People will pay $100/mo instead of buying a new car and even then what would they buy? Other car companies will see Tesla getting free money and push their own updates the same.
And COM interfaces. They could be clunky in C/C++ but Delphi implemented interfaces quite nicely[1] back in 1999[2].

And being for Windows, Delphi had full access to Win32 API.

[1]: https://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/Sydney/en/Using_In...

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Delphi_(software)#B...
> consumers wanting to keep consuming and feeling good about it while blaming someone else

Strong disagree. It feels like an attempt to convince the public at large that a) they still have significant agency and b) they should feel extremely guilty and/or empowered by that. This paradox is usually a polite fiction at best, and in the worst-case it's a well-orchestrated psy-op.

Like how "recycling" in many communities is just a different funnel that goes to the same dump, or how many good water-preserving citizens are encouraged to have short showers while we ignore the thirsty golf course next door. What are the real scenarios where the habits of the general consumer actually matter, if we stack them up against corporate consumption and those inefficiencies? Does it really make any sense for John Q. Public to feel bad about driving a gas-guzzler to work when the international shipping industry or the municipal/state government isn't looking to upgrade to electric? Or we could talk about the conspicuously missing mass-transit projects that would remove the need for the cars we're supposed to feel guilty about. Why are consumers who are already hard-pressed expected to lead the charge anyway?

> feeling good about it while blaming someone else

But we don't feel good! We feel bad because we got the wrong light bulbs and dishwashers. Every "drop in the bucket" matters, but going after drops in the first place is a paradox, so we won't feel good after we're living in dark rooms with dirty dishes either. I sure hope this actually matters and it isn't a scam to sell more dishwashers and light bulbs! Like come on, efficient appliances are great, but does it really matter when coal was still ~10% of total U.S. energy consumption in 2022? (source: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/coal/use-of-coal.php )
Secrets, Macpass on macos.
AWS's FPGA instances (essentially a big xylinx on a PCIE board) are probably a good place to start here, any standard probably should allow for the multiple sorts of interfaces that those guys provide
Spot throws a ball at my face [video]
Nice. My reply would have been something like: it combines the performance of Lisp with the productivity of C++. These days Java the language is much better though, thanks to Brian Goetz.
I must admit that this phrase hits different in the context of the six extinction.
> just the ability for people to block certain senders.

But then they just switch to a different number.
You’re talking about life or death vs. computer security. Surely there is a difference?
My concerns there are usually that data duplication for various reasons makes a ton of sense in an application. Replicating the permissions system throughout all of this duplication is usually tough, even if you do know the schema well.

Worse, though, often times applications are learning their schema as they go. This is the key benefit of "schemaless" approaches. Anything that adds friction to a schema in the system is likely to get shaken off due to slowing the teams down.

I do agree that resource approaches are the best. I try and boil it down to flat access lists for resources based on ID. Any application call that uses an ID gets checked against access lists for that ID.

I will fully grant that, if you are building a system where you do know the schema very well, then this changes.

Pulling this back to Open ID and friends, I am growing rather disillusioned with the "scope" tag on access_tokens to control this. I love the idea of being able to scope down access. I do not like the idea of leaning on that, too heavily.
But then where do you go to cut through the noise? Recruiters and talent agencies? Do we need to establish a union of “real people coders”? How does this not escalate into more fakeness?

I’m with you on the don’t waste my time angle but not quite with you on the flood them with fake applications front.
I cannot conceive of the scenario where it makes sense to recover a bounds-checking induced panic. The process should crash; the alternative is to continue operating in an unknown, irrecoverable, and potentially security compromised state.
They've certainly decimated the Tortoise population in the hi-desert near JTNP where I own property. Automobiles are way too fast for those to stand a chance.
> if the bitstream format was documented competitors would know how the device works and be able to prove their patents are being violated.

Because the word "subpoena" doesn't exist for any of these companies?
The Study of Consciousness, Accusations of Pseudoscience, and Bad Publicity
By that same logic the present state can be described as most users not knowing how to opt-out which is predatory.

Given the history of online advertising it can readily be inferred that ads do not provide enough value for almost any user to want to opt-in.
It's incorrect to generalize like this. NPCs maybe use broad procedural rules, full mocap or really anything in between.

Yes, this could apply to them. No, it doesn't mean it always does.

This also doesn't really add to the point that it wouldn't be suited to human conversation. You rarely use NPCs to have human like chats, especially for several minutes. The few games that do would be Mass Effect or LA Noire, both of which use mocap to avoid the effect I'm referring to.
Blast from the Past: Akai MPC60
The Tesla Cybertruck Can't Take a CCS Charging Adapter
Things You Can Do to Secure Your Linux Server
So why not just recalculate the federal MW as a function of the states' - lowest, median, or average? I ask because lots of things like welfare payments and estimates of poverty level involve comparisons with the MW. It's sometimes advantageous for a politician to say 'we give $X in food stamps, that's equivalent to Y hours [of federal MW], therefore people are lazy freeloaders' or 'Median rent is equal to Z hours at federal MW, therefore rental is impossible'.

If we have an officially defined metric it should correlate with real conditions in some way, get updated to reflect inflation etc.
I agree, but from an operator perspective I do not miss dealing with BES, not in the slightest.
> Java has a culture of over-engineering [which] Go successfully jettisoned

[looks at the code bases of several recent jobs]
[shakes head in violent disagreement]

If I'm having to open 6-8 different files just to follow what a HTTP handler does because it calls into an interface which calls into an interface which calls into an interface (and there's no possibility that any of these will ever have a different implementation) ... I think we're firmly into over-engineering territory.

(Anecdata, obviously)
> sending clear text passwords

Which is totally fine to do over HTTPS.
Eraseability for me is important for studying. I find it more readable and less confusing then a bunch of stuff crossed out.
So read it in the context of the comment to which it replies.
> I’ve used a 100 GB VM, whose size is given as 107 GB

Surprised to see this confusing statement in an article about understanding file sizes. The difference is due to base-2 vs. base-10 units: 100 GiB = 107.4 GB
Doesn’t the government generally have the power to assess a fine large enough to bankrupt a company?
BBN and the Development of the ARPAnet
It's also self-inflicted pain: if you keep inflating wages you keep inflating home prices, which makes it even harder to attract people in. Google is doing everything it can to cut costs, closing daycares, tracking who eats, but they have literally acres of empty, brand-new real estate. I suspect another round of layoffs may be coming. And I doubt they'll do the "random selection" again. The smart ones at the fringes started bolting for the doors in December.
That unified inbox was a real beauty, combined with all of the features described in the parent. Such a shame we still have nothing close to it.
When "Everything" Becomes Too Much: The NPM Package Chaos of 2024
Anyone remembers Firefox Hello ?
US project seeks standard way to communicate research retractions
That's something we could do in modern windowed terminals...
ai for blender would be cool
I hate the term 10x for this very reason. You’re going to put 10 times the amount of effort vs what they pay you only to be let go in the next round of layoffs while the CEO gets a bigger bonus.
Webdriver.io: Next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework
I'm well past 2x your age, and I feel that if I didn't learn something new every day it was wasted. Nobody's claiming that there's not things to learn, but somebody doing the same job for 20 years compared to a 20-something that's just started is kind of ridiculous to think they aren't just beginning.

The true sign of a 20-something is thinking they know everything because they have the book learning fresh outta school. But having 20 years on the job experience teaches you so so many more things that is never so much taught as, ahem, experienced.
NLRB doesn't just deal with unions, a fundamental part of its purpose is to ensure that conditions are allowed to exist for the creation of unions.

Here is their own page on "Jurisdictional Standards"...

https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/the-law/ju...
I don't believe in vague sentence " do not use" without logical reasoning. Can you plz be specific on why "do no use"
Why is your home folder as large as 1.2TB?

What do you keep in there? It's a lot easier and more space-saving to keep the 'Write Once, Keep Forever' stuff like music, e-books, photos, source-files, videos, etc in a dedicated 'archive' folder.

That archive folder gets rsync'ed to multiple backups on a daily basis. The rsync process only takes a few minutes for around 4TB because you're only backing up files that have been added in the last 24 hours.

My /home folder only contains personal documents like tax stuff, and other records. Plus stuff that I'm actually working on at present. Plus stuff like personal app binaries and config stuff. I try to keep it under 12 gigs. I just looked and it's currently at 11 gigs. That complete snapshot gets backed up daily. Snapshots are gradually deleted progressively over months, with some snapshots being retained permanently.
This is a pretty nice overview of the current state of affairs. All that I find missing is some exploration of where frameworks like Next.js and Remix fit into the landscape. Next.js's use of React Server Components (RSC) in its new app router reminds me quite a lot of the so-called "islands" architecture.

Straddling this spectrum between "website" and "web app" is a continual challenge for us working on our content creator social media platform at Playboy.
Corporations are a complete legal fabrication that only exist because they are constitutionally protected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juridical_person

So it's a bit of a non-sequitur to say they should not have any constitutional protections. So while I agree they should not have the same level of individual rights as people, corporations are already allowed to sign checks and enter contracts own things and be sued.

I'm just saying it makes more sense to me that we keep our constitutional powers separated. If it's a legal case it seems better for the judicial branch to do it.
This reminds me of the old Titanic CD-ROM adventure game avatars.

https://youtu.be/0pXBXIrB478?si=iQ5YtDPBSaq0ynsv

I honestly prefer the Titanic avatars though.
Why would you?

This is a one time pain for people that are already going to be frustrated with your product.

The big accounts that actually matter will simply ask their account manager to have this done for them.

This is how B2B almost always works. One rule for the masses. Then private, white glove service for the big accounts.
> Could you recommend a modern terminal that would have the features you suggest?

No. There's nobody doing it. I suggested it to the VTE team (VTE is the base of a lot of terminal programs running on Linux), but they (rather sensibly) highlighted the complexity this would add to the codebase and the numerous corner cases we should be worried about.
Exactly.

At the extreme end, there are older Chinese users who often hand write Chinese on the screen to write a sentence, one character at a time.

In the middle there are many things, like Latin but unusual layout such as French bepo, or Chinese input methods based on shapes, or Japanese kana, or the old T9 that I still see some people using (probably to have bigger letter targets).

A touch screen really ease custom input methods!
My thoughts are that dichotomy exists.

There is whole world of difference between sprinkling some effects an making web app.

We also have this dichotomy because using frameworks is all or nothing deal. You mostly cannot just drop it in some place and then use it in other part.

From the other side one also cannot really start adding some interactivity here and there to end up with web application.

You either build an application and use framework or build a website sprinkling interactivity and effects here and there.

Requirements are usually clear from the start. So the discussion is really that too many people use frameworks where they should not.

Finally Wikipedia and Wordpress are not static site - their output is - but their editing capabilities are fully web apps as every CMS out there is an app and not website or something in between.
> On behalf of all InVisioners,

For goodness sake, if you had to use one of these cutesie titles (you don't) why not InVisionaries?
Message Length (2020)
I thought it was the G2? I had the one with the z-fold keyboard that slid out on the long edge (landscape). I loved that keyboard. I could crank out long emails error free, unlike every other touch screen keyboard, like the one I’m using right now.
> Like how "recycling" in many communities is just a different funnel that goes to the same dump,

Yes, recycling was a ruse to allow people to keep consuming and feeling good about it.

>or how many good water-preserving citizens are encouraged to have short showers while we ignore the thirsty golf course next door.

This one is a valid example, and it is very easy to solve. Marginal water prices. The more water you use, the more you pay. Same with electricity.

> Does it really make any sense for John Q. Public to feel bad about driving a gas-guzzler to work when the international shipping industry or the municipal/state government isn't looking to upgrade to electric?

Yes, because it’s John Q Public that will not vote for a politician to increase fossil fuel taxes high enough to curb excess consumption. In one fell swoop, the problem of carbon emissions and plastic degradation could be solved, but John Q Public WANTS cheap travel and cheap out of season fruits.

Also, in this specific example, John Q Public is literally opting to buy gas (and electric) guzzlers instead of more energy efficient vehicles. Nobody forced anyone to buy big SUVs and compact SUVs.

>Or we could talk about the conspicuously missing mass-transit projects that would remove the need for the cars we're supposed to feel guilty about.

Because John Q Public (at least those with kids) wants detached single family homes on a 0.1 to 0.25 acre lot with a 2 car garage and a front and back yard. And mass transit simply is not tenable at those low population densities.

There’s a few people out there willing to make the sacrifices, but by and large, the population will opt for short term comforts.

Kind of like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcKqAhLeM-4
I think the catch there is that your "login endpoint" is still relying on the user's browser to get the code. The cognito endpoint returns a redirect to the user, and it is on them to follow it. So, the "code=foo" is visible to the user. If the user wants, they can try to prevent following the redirect and use that code directly.

That is, between each of your bullet points, there is a request by the user's browser. You do a request to the cognito hosted UI, it returns a code to the browser through a redirect to a webpage that is in it's "allowed list." The idea is that your "allowed list" includes a "login endpoint," but in all cases the code goes back to the user and it is on their browser to send that to the specified page.

I'm asserting that you can have javascript in the main web app that can use the "fetch" api in the browser to exchange a code for a token. That mostly hides it from accidental disclosure. And it makes it so that you don't have to have a special HTTP endpoint with another redirect in there setting cookies. (I'm assuming you'd set local storage or cookies with the fetch data.)

Right? Does that make sense?
Ukrainian scientists are tallying the consequences of the Kakhovka Dam disaster
Mise-en-place: The front-end to your dev env
Formerly known as rtx, an asdf clone, but it has expanded scope to be more of a one-stop development multitool
Yeah, the chloroplasts=cyanobacteria thing is pretty near settled these days. :)
To make mobile computing really ergonomic the better direction is getting rid of the screen altogether, replacing it with AR goggles. Then whatever physical device remains as a companion can be fully dedicated to input. This is a future I’d love to see, since it would really allow me to work from anywhere.
Could probably be just as dangerous as helpful. You work through some issues, maybe want to forgive or be forgiven to get closure and the LLM says f*k you, no.
I was following the mailing list as this was being developed way back then, but it always frustrated me that the team chose such a trite, un-googleable name for the language. I mean, if you want to find the community and the docs, you have to search for 'golang' which let me tell you, was not an automatic solution to the problem. That's actually my only complaint.
Is there even any internet carrier still holding "we're just the carrier" status? It seems like everyone is forced to filter nowadays.
Curious as to no mention of the choices around interoperability and C FFI.

"Rewrite in go" as the answer closes off a whole chunk of options.
> arguably on that basis you could claim that they aren't quite 'cooperative multitasking' on their own

Right, I think this is where I am coming from. Generators, for example, can be implemented via coroutines, but I would not call a generator "cooperative multitasking."

That's very cool! Yeah, I have never done this myself, but in my understanding implementations in assembly can be very small.

> when i went to go look at that just now i was hoping to come up with some kind of crisp statement about the relative importance or complexity of the stack-switching functionality and the run-queue maintenance facility, but in fact there isn't a clear separation between them

That's fair, but I don't think that's the final say here, as you were building a system for cooperative multitasking explicitly, with no reason to try and separate the concerns. When a system is very simple, there's much less reason for separation.

Actually, this makes me realize why I probably have this bias for thinking of them separately: async/await in Rust. The syntax purely creates a generator, it is totally inert. You have to bring along your own executor (which contains a scheduler among other things). Separating the two cleanly was an explicit design goal.
Nice, but someone should do accordion physics.
I think this hits the same points I brought up in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38873614. I do not claim that these should never be used. In fact, I would go farther and say in many cases this sort of thing should be used.
I've had gobs of fun writing systolic algorithms for FPGAs. Basically, "what if I could reconfigure my GPU with a per-core custom instruction set and local connectivity."
With what input device? Macos cant make a clicky mouse wheel smooth.
Makes you wonder what’s going to replace Figma.
As a sailor, it was infuriating when I would come across a container ship or some grain hauler with their AIS turned off.

Luckily I have other safety systems in place but damn is that a buzz kill at 3am on a new moon night.

Also another reason you would turn off AIS is if you are hauling precious cargo and don’t want pirates to know your whereabouts. I know this sounds cliche but it’s true. Cargo vessels traveling near pirate activity will often “go dark” to avoid detection and dealing with a Capt. Phillips situation.

So yeah, it’s difficult to get a fix on just how many vessels are out there, big or small. I’ve seen a lot of weird designs and contraptions out at sea.
> It. Will. Not. Happen. Short of doing it ourselves, because businesses can't spawn around those values.

What do you think "doing it ourselves" is? If you want open hardware and nobody makes it, you make it, or do a Go Fund Me etc. Then somebody makes it.

Notwithstanding what other people say, customers do actually prefer these things, if nothing else because they cost less. Once somebody makes a free and open chip design, companies will prefer to put that chip design in their devices because then they don't have to pay for one and don't have to deal with BS where their own customers want updates but upstream provides neither updates nor documentation. Because now upstream is a community anybody can participate in that keeps providing updates for 20+ years.

Customers don't prefer these things only when they're forced into an unnecessary trade off against something else. You want a Ford or Toyota running open source software but your choices are a closed source product in mass production or a kit car you have to assemble from parts. You don't want to assemble it from parts so you pick the first one. But that only sustains as long as nobody is making a competitive mass-produced car which is open source.

As soon as you have one, the permissionlessness is an advantage. Repairs are cheaper so TCO is lower so Consumer's Reports tells normies to buy it. Then the competition has to do the same thing because it's better.

Consolidated markets are a problem. If you wanted to do "iPhone, but open" you can't just glue a screen to a RISC-V CPU, the chip has to be competitive and have third party apps etc. etc.

But not everything is like that. If you wanted to do "desktop PC, but open hardware," that's the sort of thing people are actively working on and could plausibly succeed. So support them, contribute, and buy it when it's available, because it's not impossible.
If you’re more an email person, then it might be a better resource?

Need to have a process to extract information from Outlook .msg files? To: From: Body:

Actually, I guess you could just do an export from Outlook to a CSV file and then process?
As long as Chapter 11 is ok for mass murder.
guys, my two pennies: most beginners have no idea what they want.

but what we know is that what they don’t want is to produce more endless ugly and buggy code into the world - we’ve produced enough of that before they learned how to locate their asse(t)s.