skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I would recommend schema therapy to anyone. It has helped me immensely to understand feelings, thoughts, reactions, and also to decide what is and isn't something I should attend to. Additionally I would recommend dialectical behaviour therapy to anyone. It gives you the skills to interact with the knowledge gained from schema therapy. Lastly, I recommend doing mindfulness training. If you only spend 5 minutes a day it will change your life. I am able to be calm when before I wasn't, able to be thoughtful about others when before I would react, able to focus on a task and organise my day when before I could not muster the executive function to brush my teeth. These things have made my life considerably better.
DVD Logo playing a 69:420 Polyrhythm [video]
Until the general "laws" of cryptography change.
There are lots of pockets in Europe that aren't that dense, they still have good public transport, as least compared to the US.

It always really funny when American point at some place, and say 'look how not dense' and then there is like a city of 200+ people there. Sure maybe not close to other cities. But any city that size should have its own S-Bahn system at least.
That is precisely a key comparison issue. That is why I spoke about a tuple of two values; tuples by definition don't have a meaningful identity, so reference comparison is utterly meaningless for them.

Stringification is a very crude hack, and it doesn't even work in all cases - e.g. not if a part of your key still needs to be compared by reference. Say, it's a tuple of two object references, describing the association between those two objects.

Either way, the point is that this is really basic stuff that has been around in mainstream PLs for literally many decades now (you could do this in Smalltalk in 1980!).
That's a very weak "may". Different languages and compilers vary in speed by orders of magnitude, when fed similar code with similar running speed.
Stuff like that are mainly the realm of the compiler. Unless you talk chiefly to compiler programmers. Exception is writing special asm code of course or other adjacent things.
Do not worry. The article saying it might be the opposite was incorrect. You can ignore it.
Then it's not wrong.

PS: I realize you're not the person responding previously.
If you're the kind of person who addresses the substance in another person's objection, now is the time to do so.

But if you're the kind of person to seize upon a shiny but irrelevant detail and leave the substantive parts unaddressed, I guess your work is done.
They do. Over their desks, while working or in a video call.
Very interesting and extensive list. I now absolutely plan to buy Shubeik Lubeik in arabic for my SO who I just realized owns zero books in Arabic even though they speak, read and write arabic.
You have a very narrow view of therapy. Modern, research based therapy practice like dialectical behaviour therapy don't really care about your past or whatever oppression you suffered. They give you the skills necessary to interact with your life today. If you are struggling to handle problems yet believe you already know and are doing everything then I would suggest you find some humility.
Check out the open casting protocol FCast by FUTO. See https://gitlab.com/futo-org/fcast or https://fcast.org/

It is a very simple protocol with several different clients (including terminal clients) and receivers based on Electron and Android.

Also available on Firestick TV, Playstore, Android TV.

Future support for AppleTV, WebOS, TizenOS is coming.
True. Except, it's trivial to mitigate this: one only needs to wrap the whole library under one giant #ifndef. Like here, for example:
https://github.com/sheredom/utf8.h/blob/b7ed0a28eb92803c81d6...
Intel has been behind discrete GPUs for decades, even when they thought Larrabee would be a better alternative.

While they might score on Linux land by open sourcing their drivers, long time ago their OpenGL drivers weren't that great either.
https://fivebooks.com/book/naturalist-a-graphic-adaptation-e...
Simple Lasts Longer
Why do we need full-blown RPi to run FrameOS? There are many cheap ESP32-based e-paper displays like LILYGO T5-4.7", so please add support for ESP32.
I would let go of this victim mentality sooner rather than later.
dns clients come preinstalled on virtually any os
Funnily, for me intuition is the part of intelligence which I can more easily imagine as being done by a neural network. When my intuition says this person is not to trust I can easily imagine that being something like a simple hyperplane classification in situation space.

It's the active, iterative thinking and planning that is more critical for AGI and, while obviousky theoretically possible, much harder to imagine a neural network performing.
JSON's Numeric Boundaries: The Lesser-Known Reality of Inaccurate Figures
You do need the code because if the public system gets it right for (or is otherwise used by) 90% of the taxpayers, a private system for the remaining taxpayers would have to cover its costs with only 10% of the revenue. Releasing the code reduces their costs because they don't have to duplicate the parts the government already got right, they only have to fix what it got wrong.

"The rules" in this case is the tax code, which is thousands of pages and written in lawyer. You can imagine how converting that into computer code is a non-trivial undertaking notwithstanding that it's public information.
Who needs hacker news when you have chatgpt!
Rust’s Cargo vet offers an answer to that question.

You can import a list of audits from trusted auditors, which should cover all popular packages. Now you have to audit dependencies that aren’t well-known in the community, which really is the set of dependencies that you should take an extra look at. The big popular JSON libraries can be audited by either Microsoft or some of the other large projects that are using them.

You’d explicitly share your trust list in your audit file, and anything (updates or new packages) that isn’t trusted by you or one of your listed auditors is flagged for auditing.

https://mozilla.github.io/cargo-vet/index.html
And CUDA is not only C++, rather a quite mature polyglot ecosystem, with graphical debugging and plenty of frameworks to chose from.

Also to note, most folks that are driving ISO C++ heterogenous compute story are actually NVidia employees.
This is an extremely reductionist take, to infer that all human progress is motivated by a better life for your children. Certainly some people are motivated by that, but human motivations are way, way more complex than this ridiculously simplified (and aggressively conservative) worldview suggests.

The assumption that society would "quickly crumble to dust" if children's opportunities were entirely independent of their parents' efforts and successes is quite possibly the most absurd take I have heard on this website in the 10 years I have been here.
Though you needed a good balance for the slowing/accelerating sections.
>I didn't miss anything

How would you know? ;0)
This is a good tabloid take but I don't believe it's accurate. It wasn't pretending to be the same plane - it was pretending to be any aircraft with certifiable flight characteristics, particularly control forces on approach to the stall.

Indeed there is no requirement for aircraft with the same training / type certificate to handle identically. For example the whole CitationJet class from the Mustang to the CJ4.
I’ve “burned” them in with handbrake before. Took a while but it works.
The video appears to show adult men punching children. I’m guessing the children were making a nuisance of themselves. Different times.
Iron Man-like 'exosuits' can morph us into mobility marvels
Wonder what would happen if someone trained an LLM on these texts? A whole new mega religion?
Arduino IoT Cloud for Developers
> If it were easy, trust me, Nvidia and AMD would both pile on RAM and charge out the wazoo for it. I mean... look at the price difference between an A100 40GB and A100 80GB. They're the same chipset and there's a 2x price difference. Though I should mention the 80GB version is faster memory too

No one nowadays throws a price based on costs + margin for R&D and little extra stay afloat. Those times seem to end somewhere early in 2000s. I wouldn't be surprised at all if that extra 40GB of faster RAM is in 30% cost increase range.
Not sure what you mean but typically you don’t need to track changes of libraries to that level. At least not in the context of a repo using those libraries. I am thinking of treating them like binary .dlls.
> I'm also unsure of what is going to happen over time as dependencies may be moved or removed

That's what the Go module proxy is for. The authors can move or remove their repositories as much as they want, I as a dependent am not bothered by it. They would have to go through an official vetted process to get it removed from the proxy.
the average person was not this unreasonable just 7 years ago
libcurl is excellent.
This is not unique to the United States. In my home country (the Netherlands), we have an issue with refugees being placed into dedicated camps, encouraging an approach of non-integration. Integrated refugees have better metrics of success, however, and the segregated approach exacerbates numerous problems with the Dutch approach to refugees.
I really enjoyed The Fat Tail by Ian Bremmer and Preston Keat, which is about political risk and how to mitigate or manage it. Think revolutions, regulatory changes, elections etc. and how they affect markets. Another gem I found was the book Rational Choice in an Uncertain World by Robyn M. Dawes. It is a bit dated (the first version that I read is from 1988), but covers a lot of early research by people like Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. As someone born after the book was published a lot of the examples and scenarios used to illustrate rational choice were also new to me, e.g., the Cuban missile crisis, Affirmative Action. However, there is also a second edition from 2009 so it might be a better option.
Was All Systems Go organized by CCC? I don't find this information on their website.

My comment was not about Meta sponsoring stuff. It was about the long history of CCC being against companies like Meta and my puzzlement that they provide such a company a platform.
Is it ever appropriate to be polite?

That is, is it ever better to pretend we are more OK with something than we really are (for example, by saying nothing), than to speak our dissatisfaction plainly?

If you say yes, then you already accept "neutral zones" on some level -- that's what politeness is. If you say no, I'm interested to know how you avoid hurting the people in your life.
I really enjoyed geoguesser.

Don't forget: https://fmworldcup.com/excel-esports/microsoft-excel-world-c...
Cargo vet, dependency auditing for Rust
Yes. And? I didn't conflate those two.
Honestly, I'd much prefer a bland card that has actually good (and quiet) cooling to a "winter-edition" white MSI card with blue LEDs that sounds like a helicopter is taking off when you boot up a game.
that's a good starting point. the best starting point i think, actually.

how did you grow your users/customers?
I think the issue is that we're suddenly trying to pin down something that was previously fine being loosely understood, but without any new information.

If someone came to the table with "intuition is the process of a system inferring a likely outcome from given inputs by the process X - not to be confused with matmultuition which is process Y", that might be a reasonable proposal.
Does it matter?

These days there will someone who’ll be offended either which way.
> our needs (there is a LOT of heat down there). We also say solar is renewable, even though the sun does not last forever. But within our frame of reference - it does.

Photovoltaic cells surely dont last as long as the sun...
The old Infocom parsers were quite advanced and support much more advanced grammar than I think I ever considered using in playing a game like that.

Later Infocom games, and later hobby interactive-fiction, has conventions like allowing some abbreviations (x for examine, l for look, i for inventory). My transcripts are full of those. Even if the parser will probably correctly parse a sentence like "I want to look at the table, please", in practice most of us will just type "x table" anyway.

The parser also allowed for combined commands, at least in somewhat later games, so you could type things like (I think) "examine the table and then pick up everything that is on it. then ask the dwarf to go north" as a single command (but that is still going to be split up into several actions, as if they had been entered as several shorter commands). I never learned enough about the parser to dare try to use things like that as I am not quite sure what the parser would understand or not. Easier to just input one thing at a time and see what happens before typing in the next thing.

While the parsers can be impressive, I just as happily go back to play the more simpler games like the ones by Scott Adams that used a two-word parser and only read the first three letters of each word. You really don't need more than that for good player input. That user interface is much easier to use as there are fewer things you may have to try to make the parser understand what you want to do.
What does „intuit“ mean to you then?
Installing Mac Mini just to play MP3 files? That's a gross waste of money. You can use a dirt-cheap portable MP3 player for $10!

It's crazy how much money is wasted in the US, where other people are begging for food on the streets.
Yes this is true. I got into education research from physics because I thought the dynamics of learning could be very interesting to model. But we simply lack the institutional ability to implement such observations necessary to build such a model. So I zoomed out and built models on how students made choices between semesters at their university (what class they will take, will they switch their major, will they drop out). But ultimately I got bored. Now I work on ai related to acoustics. It's a shame. There are data sets out there that can be mined, I was offered a postdoc with a company in Minnesota doing it with data from millions of school children. But they were more interested in me modelling whether a student would have a behaviour problem tomorrow so they could integrate it into their platform and sell as a product to schools. I wasn't much interested in helping to build something like that.
Certainly you can point to numbers re performance. But reasoning about performance is another thing if the code is a mess.

Messiness and unmaintainability does not scale. You can argue its not a completely objective thing to measure. That is true. And yet objectively, it really matters.

Not everything that is important comes with a clear number. Which is why experience and good judgement matter too. Two more things without numbers.
I mean, currently you have to wait for a human to summarize a book, before you can read an llm rephrasing of that summary. Or you have to buy the book and pass it to the llm employing some tricks to avoid reunning out of context length.
The solution is a proper deprecation mechanism with a grace period for migration. Restricting removal or allowing instant removal are the extremes that cause trouble.
Only if you take it before having kids.
At some point you run out of pins, and the routing gets harder and harder. GDDR6 has very hard constraints on signal path length/quality. It gets expensive very quickly.
It's generally possible to disable the LEDs in software, at least.
Artificially scarce commodities, as any basic inquiry into social economics would illustrate. Naturally no one wants to have kids when they can't afford a home and need two jobs just to feed themselves and pay off their student debt.
There are different levels of understanding and only so many hours in a day of which children have not had a large share of yet. His interests and depth of understanding are not unreasonable for someone who can only be expected to have just started learning about the topic.
> I can read in its entirety for free already

then why consider paying?
Looks like a tool to combine multiple network connections to boost speed.

https://speedify.com/features/
> If you think North Korea is only where it is because the US bombed them, comrade...

You called? I think it is very relevant, but somehow it never, ever gets brought up that the cartoonishly authoritarian regime was bombed to hell in that war. That Germany lost WWII is certainly relevant to its last 80 year history, for example.

> Also, Germany, Japan, Serbian conflicts, etc. You'd have to never have seen a world map to think history never "achieve[d] anything [positive]" from interventions "on the other side of the world."

You dropped “ideology”, liar.

In the case of WWII: I have never seen anything to make me believe that the allies fought the Nazis because they were anti-fascists (ideology).
it actively tries to avoid complexity

Sounds refreshing.
LilyGo T5 is a very cheap e-paper and also based on ESP32.
I think those are all good choices and I don't judge you for k8s. It all depends if you know it already. We use GKE with auto-scaling kubernetes and it's great and took 2 day to get it terraformed sufficient to where it feels like what I had at my old job.

If/when you need to start "real company stuff":
AngelList
Mercury
Ramp
Rippling
HubSpot

I've been pretty impressed with all of those.
And also the only way they could embed logic into objects was through some very convoluted physical mechanism.
Pretty sure your comment trying to paint or at least hint at the BYD being 5x inefficient is the strange one, when it's actually ~1.1x. Which would be really low down on the list of things to consider when purchasing a $150k SUV. If I were in the market for one, I would go for the option that gives me 180km electric range rather than a puny 50km so that all the day to day short range driving is comfortably covered, even if it's only 90% efficient.

In addition, if we compare only the first 180km, your Volvo (using regular gas) comes out at

75 * 0.815 / (1000 - 50) * (180 - 50) + 10 * 0.162 = 9.98

which is actually more expensive.

Edit: All the precise calculations are in fact quite pointless.

> so the owner is definitely going to notice it on their energy bill.

Highly doubt owners of $150k SUVs are sensitive to ~$600 more over 100k kilometers.
> There is no expectation of [reciprocity] in a diverse society.

[citation needed]

> Evolution doesn't know morality, unwarrantedly nice guys finish last.

Incorrect. Citation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperation_(evolution)
The company found an interpretation that could be inflammatory enough to fire him, which is the only thing they care about. Also their social media policy is not that great apparently:

> The arbitrator said that he read this policy as not incorporating a “reasonable person” standard, meaning that workers “must be vigilant not to post anything on social media that could conceivably be interpreted as inflammatory even by highly sensitive and thin-skinned individuals without an appreciation for irony or satire.”
Not on this old Panasonic. I think it was meant only for offices.
Card Game Rules
I personally pay it, I'm german, it sometimes takes the last of my food budget for the month and I consume no radio, no tv, no news, no newspapers, nothing like that. Not very good
I recognize that in the context of threads like these "liberal" just means "Democrat" but as a non-American, it still reads funny to me. I mean you can't properly call yourself a liberal by any textbook definition of liberalism and be in ok with firing people for their political views. This is the kind of stuff ACLU fights against, right?

It's a bit like saying "socialists have aggressively attempted to take away people's unemployment benefits".
I’ve seen a lot of 65 speed limit segments and a lot of 75 but 70 is rare in my experience.
I am afraid calling Barry Boehm a "Snake oil merchant" and that he didn't achieve much merely betrays your ignorance. You need to really study up on the history of the Software Engineering field and how it came to be what it is today before giving advice to others who may know more than you. Again, go through Boehm's wikipedia page and follow links from there. Here is his "Awards" section - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Boehm#Awards

I am fully aware of Djikstra's criticism and i am not sure what you hope to show by pasting a wall of text. Just to clarify, his criticism was appropriate at that time since the field was just coming into existence and there wasn't much nailed down. The situation now is very different, we have decades of research/models/experience for a sound basis mainly due to folks like Parnas/Boehm.

It is actually funny for me to see you quote Djikstra since the whole XP/Agile rigmarole is the very antithesis of everything he stood for i.e. writing programs which are "correct" by design using Predicate Logic and not the XP/Agile method of "design and refactor a self-created mess as you go".
You can choose not to think about it, the same way you most likely don't think about the fact that many of the people who grow the food you eat, make the clothes you wear, construct the buildings you live in, and in general make possible many important parts of your life harbour that same sentiment. The only difference really is the fact that you (again, most likely) don't see most of those people face-to-face.

(I'm not arguing that you should choose not to think about it -- only that it's certainly possible to do so.)
Exploring Mojo's Usability: Python's Charm with C++ Efficiency?
I saw an example the other day that escapes annoyingly escapes my mind now, as it has been sort of overwritten by the "why the heck do some people name Makefiles with a capital M!?" pet peeve.

But I'd say a bit of everything listed in TFA. For instance global variables are the type of thing which makes a little voice say "if you do that, something bad will eventually happen". The voice of experience sometimes say things like that, though.
American exceptionalism is nothing new, and it isn't uncommon. However the approach that you are using to attempt to break through it is not going to be effective in the slightest.

For one, you can call literal propaganda for what it is, but propaganda isn't necessarily wrong on the facts. Pointing out that 'you didn't care about issue X until you did' is not going to get the self-reflection you hope for, because at the end of the day, the propaganda is pointing out a message that cannot be countered since what it points out is true.

Second, anything to do with 'one of your parties did a bad thing' is counterproductive and contrasting the legal ramifications of the riots is not even close to being on par -- the USA has a functioning (if sometimes overhanded and racist) justice system and the fact that the offending parties were prosecuted publicly and not taken to a secret camp and shot shows that even if the perps didn't get their just deserts, it was all above board and it was effective.

'The world' is, again, a dead end. You absolutely cannot win an argument that the USA was somehow not the stabilizing military factor in the west and didn't provide a large portion of the major world stage level achievements since the end of WWII. If it weren't for the $$$trillions/yr on patrolling oceans in carriers, flying sorties, launching sats, and just generally being the hall monitor and the bully, then a whole lot of things would be incredibly different. You can argue for better or worse, but hardly any American would argue that it is for worse, if they honestly accept that they like their modern lifestyle.

I suggest going the Socratic way next time.
You'd still have to parse & compile the contents of the header for each translation unit, instead of only once.
Pretty sure the script made his machine SSH back to one of mine rather than open ports.