skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Refuelling the Rav4 is an errand that takes time, planning, and mental energy

Is there something about that RAv4 vehicle that makes fueling difficult? I have a Lexus, generally it tells me “hey! I’m low on fuel” so I stop at the next convenient gas station I see, fill it with gas in about 5 mins, and I am back on my way to wherever. Sometimes when I am feeling particularly rebellious, I happen to be driving by a gas station even before the car is low on fuel, and I stop and top it off in a few minutes and then am on my way to wherever.

Also, sometimes I’m driving and want a cup of coffee and stop at a coffee shop too…
^ this. This is pretty much the only thing I would add; when doing an "add to home screen" and going to full screen, it still shows the phone and browser borders, which aren't black. Adding a manifest.json, setting theme_color and background_color: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web... would help a lot on mobile with the immersion effect Sit is aiming for.
The pattern in general is called "event sourcing", but unfortunately it's popular enough to make a lot of bad articles appear, and I can't recommend a good one.
Is there any use case that's actively deployed, where DANE is being used? I tried to look up use cases that exist today, and it seems like it's "people who run their own postfix/exim servers", 2 niche email providers, and... GPG?
> "This family has two mommies. They love each other so proudly and they all go marching in... the... big parade," sing the lyrics. Other terms featured include "trans," "non-binary" and "queer."

> “Love is love is love you see, and everyone should love proudly,”

Acknowledging LGBTQ people are capable of love is somehow an example of “culture war”. It’s incredible people can be so bothered by a simple, sweet message.
You don’t need to be a mechanical engineer to know that is contraption is going to feel very uncomfortable to hold.

There are actually a bunch of other negatives that the cofounder did not mention. You will also lose the ability to quickly type emojis(might actually be a good thing). No more autocorrect/prediction and the keyboard is missing some common symbols such as angle brackets.

Another likely problem with this keyboard is that the keys are too small because they are round. Square keys were the common choice for most cellphone keyboards for this reason.
I'd buy that for a dollar!

https://nestflix.fun/its-not-my-problem/
Employing a contractor on terms they agree to is not unethical. Skating close to the edge of the law is unethical, and I'm sure everyone agrees that Google will add more restrictions to the contractors to make sure they are separate from the employees.

> Because a big company, especially one the size of Google, has a huge advantage over the employees that it negotiates with.

I've never had a job with the sort of benefits an equivalent role at Google would have. That argument is bunk; if negotiating power were so important the equivalent role would be paid less. Google doesn't have that sort of negotiating power; it has to take the market price same as everyone else does.

In fact, the consistent calculus across a career as a salary earner is how much negotiating power you want vs how much you are willing to trade away in terms of flexibility. Large, boring inflexible companies tend to offer consistently better deals. That is why they are bigger than the average company. People take the deal they offer when the option is there.

It takes an extremely rare set of skills to turn negotiating power into a better bargain. As I'm sure you are well aware.
I discovered that I can be a bit of a tease.
How would this stack up to the likes of KeyDB’s streaming? More durable persistence is my take.
Hah, we did not come up with the headline :). Really the vision for Wave is to have an out-of-the-box excellent terminal experience that's consistent across all of the machines that you log into. We also bring cool new features to the terminal like command blocks, output renderers, persistent sessions, and universal history (across all of your sessions, local and remote).
Cameroonian SMBs still run heavily on real paper, including writing invoices for customers. I’ve moved all of these processes into a Whatsapp chat assistant, allowing to control all aspects of sales, post sales, accounting, CR, HR, stock management, documents exchange, etc. into an app which is already heavily used here: WhatsApp.
Parts of this definitely appear to have been traced, although I'm not sure if it was done manually or by a vectorizer.

Around the `OF` in the `FIELD LIST` flow, the green edge has the same perspective change as in the original, cf: https://www.attentionspan.nl/posts/technology/apple-pascal-s...

Lots of other little peculiarities of the original seem to be preserved. So it definitely wasn't re-made solely from reference.
"When it starts to fail, please don't curse us."
Optimizing something with AD is machine learning.
Maybe he thinks San Diego (George Hotz) is not west of Moscow (or maybe Alex moved now to London).
er... I'm pretty pro-ev, but I don't think you can reasonably generalize feeling so put-upon by the non-financial aspects of getting gas.
So I encountered this Purgatory over the course of several years, since I began to earn professional certifications. These certificates came in standard Letter size, 8.5x11 pages, with glossy durable paper. They also issue them electronically in PDF format, Letter-size as well, so it's easy to print them and even upgrade paper quality. Last year, I finally earned graduation from college, and my certificate came in the mail: 8.5x11 as well!

So where are the Letter-size picture frames? I want to hang these credentials on my wall, or frame them and place them on a shelf! They will look very nice that way! But all picture frames on the market are for 8x10 photographs! So it's horrible; I can't use the standard-issue, original certificates at all. I can't print them as-is, and reducing their size does not yield the 8x10 aspect ratio you need.

Eventually, over the course of several years, I've managed to amass a few 8.5x11 picture frames from thrift stores. It wasn't easy, they don't match one another, and they're uncommon, but they do exist. Likewise, no big-box store or specialty framing store seems to carry such an animal.

So if these frames are so unobtanium, why are these authorities issuing certificates in this size? Don't they know we have little hope of framing them nicely? Surely there is some sort of disconnect, and surely there is a market-niche opportunity, especially for college-grads, like Josten's, or our college bookstore, to source these and sell them to us!
love what you are doing for the web! unfortunately I've not been able to receive the verification email, I guess you're having some issues at the moment.
It's not trivial to get right. People easily misunderstand the purpose of multimodule projects and parent POMs. And before you know it, your team is maintaining versions of all dependencies in a released parent, and all modules need to be updated at the same time when there's a new version of the parent. Yey, a distributed monolith. Or something like that. Perhaps make a simple parent POM that defines long-term truths for your organization (where your Maven repository is, maybe some very well-established build configuration, and zero to none dependencies).

(And if you want to manage dependencies a bit more strictly, like everywhere in oop: composition over inheritence.)
Yeah, although my experience is that people collect shell aliases and similar workflows that always do something like `mvn clean package` and then complain about build times.
IIRC, Google tried to use Go for their Fuchsia TCP stack and then backtracked. Not a systems programming language for sure.
I see. I don’t really agree with lumping everything else into “yet another tool”:

- The marginal cost of adding a second tool to your build step is generally lower than adding a build step in the first place

- Tools like esbuild give you both TypeScript compilation and bundling out of the box with zero extra dependencies, so you don’t actually need to add an extra tool to your workflow

- Tools like Vite technically do include extra tools but hide the complexity from you, so from your perspective it’s just a single tool
Can someone with expertise explain why this is so difficult?

As an outsider with no knowledge of robotics, I've always been surprised that manipulation tasks (or just smooth robotic movement) are so challenging and seem to progress so slowly, especially when compared to IT.
I think cloudflare has TURN servers now? Might make it easier.
> Right, but it would take a lot of steps for it to even make it to the Supreme Court in the first case. As it is this has a huge chance of being instantly dismissed.

This is in the 5th Circuit. The 5th Circuit has already ruled that ALJs (administrative law judges) are unconstitutional, [0] a precedent which SpaceX is directly citing in this case–14 times. [1] Indeed, this is basically just copy-pasting the holdings from that judgement against the SEC, and applying them to the NLRB. The only way the NLRB wins given that precedent, is to convince the court that there is some constitutionally significant difference between the SEC's ALJs and its own–and even if the District Court judge were convinced of that, I doubt the 5th Circuit (the most conservative of the federal Courts of Appeal, and with a reputation of being unfriendly to the NLRB) would agree. So no way does this have a "huge chance of being instantly dismissed".

However, that 5th circuit ruling is currently being appealed at SCOTUS (SEC v Jaresky). [2] It was argued in late November, so we should have a ruling by late June / early July, possibly even earlier. If SCOTUS upholds the 5th Circuit's ruling, SpaceX very likely wins. If SCOTUS overturns the 5th Circuit's ruling, SpaceX very likely loses. Both sides will readily agree to drag this out until they get that ruling.

SpaceX's lawyers aren't really doing anything legally original here, just setting themselves up to potentially benefit from an upcoming SCOTUS ruling, if it happens to go their way. This case is unlikely to ever make it to that level, because that level will have already decided it one way or the other.

This is somewhat misleading journalism, trying to make it sound like SpaceX is launching an novel attack on the NLRB, as opposed to just piggy-backing themselves on somebody else's attack on the entire ALJ system.

[0] https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-61007-CV0.pd...

[1] https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/sp...

[2] https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/securities-and-e...
Laws and Contracts
is there anything done at all to make laws easier and quicker to be enforced, if yes who is working on it and why papers are still used, and why we still have papers, courts and old slow bureaucracy
Hah, 100% not a paid promotion, although it is kinda awesome that you think it is! We were thrilled with the coverage (our first article!) after we soft launched on /r/opensource.
Are cartoon physics insulting kids intelligence?

Tom coming back 1 second after being blown up with dynamite makes sense?

Maybe these kinds of cartoons are bad according to you.

There it research that kids are more interested in stuff which is surprising (fixation period, ...) because that builds a model of how the world works, not the easily predicted stuff.
your website seems broken.
I’d say it leaves you cursed with joy but I may be biased as I created it. I really like the name Cursus and I found it one day just translating English to Latin, just randomly and really liked the meaning of it and it’s super easy to remember so I kept it in my back pocket until I had something to use it for and when designing CursusDB it sprung up whilst drawing out the initial algorithms.
Fair enough.

And the world would be a better place with a positive-bias.

Except that this article purports to be self-critical, so arguably the very topic of this thread should cover both the positive and negative of the language, and our comments are merely expanding on it.

But thanks for the explanation, I appreciate it.
LLaMA Pro: Progressive LLaMA with Block Expansion
Appears to be a way to address catastrophic forgetting in LLMs
why the vision in the url is not yet achieved and normalized
Paul, haha, that’s a person name!
Love this as a low level visual debugging tool.

What if you can compile down to Excellvm? Can see issues at a glance.
Anything where you're actually ok with all the NEUVWY branded junk on Amazon but want it much cheaper in exchange for possibly slightly slower delivery and a horrible browsing experience.
It is a good name. I'm just working on taglines for you. ;-)
tailor the hardware to your particular application.Depending on the complexity/fpga, your application can reside in the hardware, or even it is the hardware.
I find it sad that even showing kids sliding on the wet tile floor is edited for "being safe" - let them learn why its a bad thing to do in the security of home!
They come from employees of various companies, not employees of some company that owns Linux itself. All those various companies have different goals, and are only contributing because doing so is in their economic interest. Having a stable ABI would require a lot more work, and these companies have zero incentive to invest in this effort: it doesn't help their profitability, it just makes things easier for others outside their companies. Arguably, it also makes the kernel code a lot more complicated and bug-prone.

It makes sense for MS, for example, to want a stable ABI to make things easier for 3rd-party devs so they'll target that platform, and for MS to shoulder the effort of maintaining that ABI cumbersomeness. It doesn't really makes sense for Linux. You could argue that this hampers adoption of Linux as an alternative to Windows on desktop machines, but even if that's true, no one involved really has an economic incentive to change this. In the places where Linux is dominant (Android + servers + embedded), a stable ABI isn't really helpful or needed.
Sounds like someone hasn’t had to sit through blippi
I’m hoping in a good way!
Perhaps they were talking about deepdream? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepDream
open source self hosted?
The problem is that you don’t really know if your mock accurately implements the behavior of the database. The only way you could verify the mock behaves correctly would be to run the mock and a real database instance through a set of tests to verify they both implement different isolation levels identically.

At that point—why bother with the mock at all? Cutting out the intermediary and running integration tests of your application against a real database will be faster.

You can’t use SQLite here either because all SQLite isolation levels are serializable anyway, which is _very_ different from how PostgreSQL works. Testing against SQLite could end up giving you a false sense of security that your code is safe against race conditions, whereas in reality it’s vulnerable when connected to a PostgreSQL server because of the difference in default isolation levels

At this level of testing detail the only real option is to test against a real database that matches what you’re running in production. Otherwise you’re just testing a mock.
I have to agree. The moment I laid eyes on Gradle, I knew the Java ecosystem was going to continue its decline by the community’s adopting it as the new defacto standard. I have never adopted Gradle and have only used maven in all my projects.

There is a point I want to make about the excessive complexity of projects funded by Enterprise support/training revenue models. However, I cannot do so because I have no good data to back up any claims I want make.

If someone has the data, please enlighten us.
I’m pretty sure you can’t achieve zero client-side JavaScript with pages router. You get pre-rendered HTML and it will gracefully degrade without executing JavaScript, yes…but it still comes with a JS bundle that clients will normally execute to hydrate that pre-rendered HTML into react components.

RSCs using the app router, on the other hand, don’t have that hydration phase.
Oh haha! I didn’t even catch on! Thank you
That is basically day dreaming, not really true meditation.

It's best to do both for different purposes. It's kind of like biking and weight lifting. You could count both as "exercise" but they serve different purposes and can work in conjunction.
Did you compare the cost of using a GPT plus subscription and use GPT by API?
As a software engineer, mostly time I use Copilot(Chat) in my daily work.
It is very convenient because the Copilot chat is integrated with the VSCode.
I have been a GPT Plus user for a couple of months, but recently I canceled my subscription
because I found my frequency of GPT Plus is reducing.
Now there are a lot of open-source GPT clients, I made a client from one of them and deployed it on my server.
I think it is enough for me. So I started to use GPT by the ChatGPT API, its advantage is that I’m only charged as I use it.
I don’t know if it is a smart choice, but I’d like to hear your opinions.
Did you guys compare the cost of using GPT Plus and ChatGPT API?
Any suggestions are welcome.
What light switches did you use, if any?

I also want to use Shelly dimmers, but I haven’t found simple stateless light switches. I want automation and app control in many cases, but also want simple tactile button for on/off or hold for brightness control. Amazingly hard to find.
It's ironic that they pulled an episode for using a term that is offensive to indigenous Australians and "fixed" it by releasing a version where the phrase was replaced with a racial slur for Italian people
'Chest' always hits me in the feels. Not subtle at all, but it works.
We already have .1x which supports various auth methods such as certificate auth and can use policies to assign clients to VLANs
I don't follow DANE but I think support among the mail community is wider than you suggest unless Microsoft Exchange Online is one of the niche email providers you're referring to.
Results of 2023 Expert Survey on Progress in AI
That would be good advice except I’ve yet to see a compiler that can make this kind of stuff visible. First it’s distributed throughout your codebase and I’ve not seen any profiler that can show that impact unless you’re lucky and this becomes a hotspot. This applies to nearly all compiler generated code. Valgrind can measure it (sampling profiler probably can’t) but there’s no tooling to highlight diffuse code gen problems
Passwords need to be sent both with the request, and to the requestor. I think GP is referring to sending credentials to the service making the request.

It is far better to give service XYZ a time-bound and scope limited token to perform a request than a user's username and password.
it's not only winter but many industrial processes moved out of Germany because of high energy price. Large chemical plants are just running at minimum capacity: https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/german-chemicals...
The first time I ever flew on an airline, I was about 20 years old (early 1990s), and my friend counseled me that the best/safest meal could be had by requesting a Kosher or vegetarian exception. Therefore I dutifully specified Kosher, please, for my in-flight dinner.

The food was acceptable, but it got really weird in some of the conversations between me, stewardesses, and seat mates, who all heard about my Kosher preference and they were curious just what sort of Jew I might be. (I was a cradle, lapsed Catholic goth boy at that point.)

It gets a bit more interesting; a couple of years hence, I found myself dating a Messianic Jew and attending her "Jews for Jesus" synagogue. When Pesach came around, I dutifully attempted to keep Kosher for the entire period, and discovered that I really had no idea what "Kosher for Passover" entailed, and therefore, I erred on the side of caution by eating nothing but plain matzah all day long.

I never tried that again.
Only per the HTTP spec, and this is the same misunderstanding that the golang developers have. Because it's so common to preserve header casing as requests traverse networks in the real world, many users' applications or even developers' APIs depend on header casing whether intentionally or not. So if you want to interact with them, or proxy them, you probably can't use Go to do so (ok, actually you can, but you have to go down to the TCP level and abandon their http request library).

Go makes the argument that they can format your headers in canonicalized casing because casing shouldn't matter per the HTTP spec. That's fine for applications I guess, though still kind of an overreach given they have added code to modify your headers in a particular way you might not want to spend cycles on - but unacceptable for a systems language/infrastructure implementation.
Disney and Pixar have IP and parks, and a lot of cost with animators, actors, and directors to make new productions off of that IP. If in a few years all you need is 5000 Disney will make new IP for 5000 and structure it in the way that is most beneficial for their multiple franchises based off of their IP.

Disney won't be toast, they'll be a full continental breakfast in a 5-star hotel served by Star Wars Mickey in a waiter's costume.
> What do you mean, "flawed"? Merkle-Damgard-flavored hashes are extendable by design.

Flawed as in "cryptographically insecure". Which in this case is "it lets you predict something about the hash of one input from the hash of a different input".

As I see it, a cryptographically secure (read: flawless) hash function is just another name for an RNG whose output is computationally impossible to predict without knowledge of its seed. Hash functions that are vulnerable to length extension don't satisfy that: their outputs on longer inputs can be predicted from their outputs on shorter inputs, without any knowledge of their keys. That's a pretty big flaw. To me they're similar to hashes that lack the avalanche effect. They're not cryptographically secure as far as I'm concerned.

> you need a MAC, not a "hash"

I hate jargon honestly. I just refer to these (cryptographically secure) hashes and move on with my day. To me a hash that's vulnerable to length extension isn't cryptographically secure. I kind of assume people understand I'm assuming sufficiently strong building blocks when proposing a way to compose them, otherwise it makes for an uninteresting discussion.

> Most people in your situation would just use HMAC. You're not really optimizing anything by avoiding HMAC

Totally agree, but I wasn't suggesting you can't or shouldn't. I just didn't see HMAC as a requirement, hence why I didn't specifically write HMAC.
Bye, RStudio/Posit
For how long do you usually meditate?