skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I was quite impressed by the voice chat featured added to the ChatGPT app.

On the otherhand the Google assistant experience has been frustrating and gimmicky at best. I've found to do anything requires you to phrase things in a specific way, and even then it doesn't quite "get" what I'm looking to do.
TLDR: remove distractions & use pomodoro.
I'd argue that you intuitively do. When driving, you know when to press it lightly, and when more, as well as what the expected result will be.

That would mean, I think, that the implementation details are irrelevant, because it's abstracted well enough to serve its purpose - and it's so easy that usually the FIRST driving lesson takes you into actual traffic (at least in Poland).
Is this article just two strawmen fighting?
Do you know the priority in this?

[ -e "${target}" ] && echo "Getting information about ${target}" && stat "${target}" || echo "Failed to stat file."

EDIT: What about the || die("...") pattern in Perl?

Or the fact that the glyphs in || are visually lower than the glyphs in &&?

Or that "and" comes before "or" in the expression "and/or"?
I think the idea was that capitalism was at fault, so we should go back to whatever variant of the system Boeing operated under when there were less failures. Or else I’m not sure why their conclusion would be that the fix would be to reel in capitalism.
Sorry, when I think of applying diffs I think of using the patch command that literally takes a set of files and a diff and applies the diff to the files. patch doesn't know any history and doesn't do 3-way merges. In my mind a 3-way merge is different than just "applying diffs"

I'll look for her post about rebase, it sounds interesting, thanks!
Guess what, the old Boeing that did the 777 is just as much 'capitalism' as the one that did the MAX. Arguable more so because they were less focused on military and government contracts depending on what we mean when we are saying 'capitalism'.

If by capitalism you mean 'profitable' then Boeing was more so before they started making shitty products.

The reality is companies and all organisation, for many reason change over time.
Airbus is much, much stronger competition then Douglas ever was.
I was going to say the same thing. This is why I like Fantasy and Science Fiction genres. They both stretch your mind with new ideas by combining what is known and possible today with what could be possible or might just be fun conceptually to explore.

I find that good fiction stretches the mind to explore new ideas that non fiction can’t do since it is rooted in reality and known facts.

I find that i try to juggle one fiction book and one non-fiction book at a time. There are times when my mind wants to be rooted in reality, fact, and true history. But then sometimes (even within the same reading session) I may switch to fiction to let my mind wander in new ways which sometimes results in ideas and conceptualization in my real life brought by the fiction exploration.
I'm Irish, but I've never heard of this. I was surprised to see it is an Irish production, and narrated by Chris O'Dowd!

I guess my kids are a bit young and missed it. Same as how many people without kids in the appropriate age range may not have heard of bluey.

Going to try it with my kids, thanks for the recommendation.
> Adding indirection makes code less maintainable.

This is why I hated Fortran (77 in particular) as an applications language (for tasks like scientific computing people seemed to use saner portions of it). Computed go tos were the bane of my existence.
Well-said, although I disagree that it's "muddled".

The data model is that commits are snapshots, and diffs between snapshots are computed as needed. The whole system is designed around this.

Packing is an implementation detail.

The fact that internally it can store snapshots as diffs is more or less unrelated to the user-facing diffs. IMO it's confusing to even mention it in an educational context, except in response to the question of "how does Git prevent repo size from exploding?".
Jesus, that's bad.
>They say the program needs a total rewrite and proceed to add 20 layers of inheritance and spreading out every function over 8 files.

Anyone who in 2023 still thinks inheritance is a good idea for anything other than a few very specialised use-cases is not somebody who seriously cares about the craft of software development, not somebody who's put any effort to study programming theory and move beyond destructive 1990s enterprise Java practices. Widespread usage of inheritance inevitably makes code harder to reason about and refactor, as anyone who's compared code in Java to code for similar functionality in Rust or Go would see (both Rust and Go deliberately eschew support for inheritance due to the nightmares it can cause).
Just as a reminder to folk, safari never allowed third party cookies by default, and when google made chrome they made the choice to enable third party cookies as the primary purpose of chrome is to support google's ad business. Anything that they do needs to be considered in context, including "different" browsers that just re-ship chromium, as they simply solidify the chromium monopoly of what defines the web - i haven't seen "you must use safari" or "you must use Firefox", only "you must use chrome". I've seen enough people (incl. on HN) claiming that if chrome and the spec or chrome and other browsers diverge chrome is inherently right to recall the days of "IE is always the correct one" (also try to remember that while MS did a bunch of clearly BS reasons to beat netscape, IE was also a more capable, faster, and more responsive browser than netscape at the time, it was only once it rendered netscape irrelevant that the great stagnation happened).
As it turns out, we care about details like “does diffing two branches show output inside of a week”. Diff-based systems were very slow at constructing a diff between divergent branches.
> One long, yet simple function has less cognitive overhead than spreading the function across multiple classes or functions or call hierarchies

Not if you are encapsulating and naming effectively...

Why read 100 lines when you can read 20 and find concerns in one routine you are concerned with?

Function calls can be expensive. However, optimization can come whenever you need it, and if what you need is one call vs 5, it is trivial to move that code back into a single routine.
"Most" is factually wrong. Some yes, most on fact need a crack, most do not have any kind of other DRM other than the trivial steam DRM so they need a steam emu to actually run. You can use steamless and goldberg emu to crack and basic game on your own without actually downloading some exe someone else touched if you are paranoid. But you have to actually do this for most games, the amount of games that just run without that is NOT "most", AAA or not.
Boeing management's attitude reminds me of this passage from the novel "The Sea-Wolf by Jack London".

“Do you know the only value life has is what life puts upon itself? And it is of course over-estimated since it is of necessity prejudiced in its own favour. Take that man I had aloft. He held on as if he were a precious thing, a treasure beyond diamonds or rubies. To you? No. To me? Not at all. To himself? Yes. But I do not accept his estimate. He sadly overrates himself. There is plenty more life demanding to be born. Had he fallen and dripped his brains upon the deck like honey from the comb, there would have been no loss to the world. He was worth nothing to the world. The supply is too large. To himself only was he of value, and to show how fictitious even this value was, being dead he is unconscious that he has lost himself. He alone rated himself beyond diamonds and rubies. Diamonds and rubies are gone, spread out on the deck to be washed away by a bucket of sea-water, and he does not even know that the diamonds and rubies are gone. He does not lose anything, for with the loss of himself he loses the knowledge of loss. Don’t you see? And what have you to say?”
In a merge commit with 4 parents, what diff does the commit represent?
The Pigeon Protocol
Programmers developing webshits should really be forced to add 200ms to all their roundtrips. It’s worrying how many people assume everyone is 20ms from their “edge”, and openly advocate on HN for “new” technology that requires a roundtrip on every single state change, unwinding twenty years of client side advancements.
The 737 MAX has been in service since 2017 and has accumulated over 6.5 million flight hours. In that time, there have been no reported cases of parts departing aircraft due to overheating of the engine nacelle inlet structure,” the filing states.

That's your rationale?

Have we forgotten when NASA management discounted concerns about O-rings in part because one hadn't catastrophically failed yet? (Until Challenger)
> Universe knows, there are many bells and whistles you could have tacked on, possibly dooming this project to stay in the "project shelf" for a much longer time.

If you click on the logo, it shows placeholders for many other time related tools the author has plans to implement like a meeting planner, scheduler, calendar and pomodoro timer etc. I'm happy that they took the MVP approach instead of waiting long to launch that perfect suite.
Did you provide the login credentials for the demo account?
You could create a Nostr protocol with a delete message, but the problem there is of course it would be a "soft delete", since anyone scanning the messages under the hood can see the original. In some sense a regular site is like that (you could see it on Internet Archive, but maybe that is less likely to be done, and it is coming from a secondary source anyway).
Is that `./calculate_average_royvanrijn.sh`? It runs in 6.7s for me.

I would love it if you could run my solution and compare!
What do you mean it's a finite resource, I take a shower with some water, it gets dumped, cleaned then I can use it again. Does me taking a longer shower just disintegrate the water?
Chrome is an amazing browser, thank you Google for investing a lot of money into it!
Tools specially for Mac repair. Anyone else remember the "case cracker"? It was a very broad hinged wedge you had to use to open up the original all-in-one Macs (with the 9" B&W screens). There were some capacitors in those machines that blew out frequently. Fantastic computer for its time though, if you could afford it.
your questions are literally the reason why internet is not what it used to be. not everything needs to be about money, people can do things out of their own interest and needs
Thankyou,So this means the cpu outputs data into the upper 8bits of the address and the stack pointer points to the lower 8bits?

So for example
if the current top of the stack is 0x01FF then
then SP will store FF, which being upper 8 bits of 0x01FF
and the data will be at 01 which being lower 8bits of 0x01FF ?
Nice that you can try it for free, but I'd really like to see the Pricing page before I commit. And there's no link to it.
> Git actually presents a very simple view to the user: repository states across time.

That doesn't explain commands like rebase or cherry-pick or even patch. The diff algorithm that generates diffs based on history is very much integral to git, even if it is configurable. There are plenty of git commands that assume you can meaningfully transform a commit into a diff from its parent(s). So commits are sometimes snapshots sometimes diffs, depending on the tool you're using to interact with them.
Oh, very neat. Do you know if they do it with PWA or some other approach?
common for you != common for everyone else. i live in japan, i would have absolutely no need for some random us / europe comparison
The PhD economists on our team looked at it.

Economists from other teams looked at it and signed off.

There was manual testing — ie, trying some “choice values”.

We discovered their error in convexity when our test suite allowed us to randomly sample the models at scale. (Actually, I had questions before that — but unsurprisingly, when it was just me questioning a PhD economist, the lowly SDE was ignored.)

Good intentions aren’t enough; you need mechanisms.
My Proposal for Enhanced Web Transparency: Introducing AI-Specific HTML Tags
Nice! I saved to my iPhone Home Screen. However, the icon was a black box with a white T. When I tapped to save it showed a much nicer black box with yellow swirl - looks like an icon file is missing.
Jeffery Epstein would like a refund.
https://www.statista.com/topics/8418/petrochemical-industry-...

16% of world oil consumption is not nothing. AFAIK we don’t have good replacements and cost isn’t the only reason. And even if it is, think about how pervasive petrchochemical plastics are - it seems unlikely we’d go back so even if we switched to more expensive replacements, that means the price of a lot of stuff is going to go up by a lot…
It’s because they love you so much.
What if a new person takes your place and they do not know it and are not certain in anything?
My 30-Year Quitting Addiction
Shell scripting sucks, but that’s hardly news.

If I really have to touch a bash script, I just assume nothing works like I might expect from proper programming languages despite any surface similarity, and google every construct with sweat drops dripping down my face. ChatGPT has made the process somewhat more tolerable.
Maybe by instances of the same codebase, yeah absolutely.

But there is certainly more codebases out there running some python or js written by designers, data analysts etc then those produced and curated by software engineers.
If you look at his profile and look at his about, then you know why he’s asking this.
It’s not cursed, it’s the inevitable outcome of regulatory capture. That Boeing have suffered little to no consequences from the Max failures is a symptom of an FAA that desperately needs a purge of corrupt processes and officers.
> Neither of those constitutes even a tiny fraction of the American capability to wage war.

How would we know that? We haven't seen the US go to war against a top-ten global power in something like 70 years. They might be quite close to the cap of what they can do for all we know. Obviously they have nukes so they aren't going to be invaded, but their ability to control conflicts the like of which we see in Europe, sorta-present in the Middle East and potentially in Asia is very much open to doubt.

The linked article is suggesting that the US shipbuilding industry is operating at 1/20th of what a competitive shipbuilding industry in Japan is, that has interesting implications on the fact that the US is spending 10x as much in their military budget as Russia and 4x China.

I'm not up to speed on the state of stockpiles and democracies tend to be violent military behemoths. So I'd still bet on the US being comfortably ahead of everyone else. But it's performance in the Ukraine has not been as impressive as the gap in budgets suggests it should be. We might observe that it is exhausting the US's ability to provide military support. The US also happens to be broke if anyone cares to check in on their finances. It isn't at all absurd to question the US's military strength here; these wars are not easy for them. Particularly if the response to "this seems inefficient" is going to be "well it is really a welfare program; we don't expect effective production to be happening here".
>Medical debt is the #1 USA reason to personally declare bankruptcy... USA! USA!! USA!!!

No. Only 4% of US bankruptcies are because of medical bills. <https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/0...>. A tipoff that insert large percentage here of bankruptcies aren't actually because of medical costs is that only 6% of bankruptcies by those without health insurance are because of that cause. The biggest cause of bankruptcies is lack of income, which health insurance doesn't affect.
That explains it well, thankyou!
Nearly 100%, the other time is spent planning tests, discussing new features with users. I probably spend 90% of the time actually coding.
As someone who has lived here for going on 15 years, he really unintentionally nailed the whole spectrum of experience of living in Chicago.

And “Live in a city for any amount of time and you'll start to develop a subconscious odds calculator.” was very relatable.
> i'd forgotten about bright/dim blink

Everyone has... I'm not sure it's a big loss, but I found it funny to "fix" and the fun of tweaking tiny things like that lies at the core of a whole lot of terminal bikeshedding...

> i've been thinking that maybe nested tables would be better than character cells, for example, accommodating proportional fonts and multiple sizes much better

A lot of simplicity could easily go away if it's not done well, but I like the idea. I want to eventually support some limited "upgrades" in that direction, but will take some cleanup efforts before that'll be priority.
Author here, obviously not. The goal of the project isn't to try to solve a problem that can't be solved, it's to reduce the effort needed to set up a WebRTC signaling server. The "P2P" here is referring to the peer network that is established via the signaling.
Internationally yes. In the US, Boeing has their guaranteed government contracts, it's not a market anymore.
Effectively, the top eight bits of the address bus are hard wired to always be 0x01 when the "stack" is being accessed. It is part of the decode and execution hardware of the CPU.

It is also why the stack is always in page 1, and can not be moved to any other page.

The stack pointer is used to drive the lower eight bits of the address bus during a stack read or write. The upper eight bits are always 0x01.
Commits are also used as diffs by several git commands - rebase, cherry-pick, patch, probably others. These commands take a commit and a target branch, but they use the commit as a diff from its parent, not as a snapshot. So it's fair to say that git's own API treats commits as diffs in some situations.
This feels like a false dichotomy. Is a shadow the absence of light or is it a black blob? Well: both! In a purely physical sense it's the absence of light but in your vision it's a black blob, and these are both true and useful.

Given that she wrote a whole post about it the author obviously knows that both are useful, but I'd expect most people to use both frames of reference and switch as necessary rather than picking just one.
Author here. KV did not provide the consistency guarantees needed for this to work. If you were signaling across two edge nodes, you didn't see candidates until the data was replicated, which took a long time. R2 doesn't have this problem.
I don't disagree. One way to know if it can live up to the hype is that it will be the lighthouse feature of the next iPhone which will both not have a notch for the front facing camera, it will do "touch anywhere" touch ID and process all of the screen operating gestures visually rather than capacitively so that you can operate you phone while wearing ski gloves if you want too.
>This is probably "just" a maintenance issue.

>The Boeing 737-9 MAX rolled off the assembly line just two months ago, receiving its certification in November 2023, according to FAA record posted online.

How does the maintenance crew fuck up a plane this badly in the span of two months?
> when you change 1 line of code, the diff may or may not show it as having changed one line of code.

Can you offer an example where an editor is used to change one line of code, and a resulting diff leads the user to believe that the number of changed lines is not one?

I don't think people interpret an adjacent opposing pair (one line removed, immediately followed by one line added) as not show[ing] it as having changed one line of code.
At the time I wrote this library using websockets on Cloudflare would have been prohibitively expensive compared to this polling method. Has that changed?
Stan and the gang will try and pawn this off on Spirit, but Renton is supposed to do high blow[1]. It's one of the last things that gets done, with hydraulics and suchlike. I'm just guessing here, but I bet someone waived a batch of Spirit stuff through the process to get more units out the door. "Eh, this whole block is probably fine". False Equivalence strikes again[2].

[1] Simulated full pressurization, often many of them

[2] And yeah. Spirit's got problems. But those problems wouldn't be problems if Boeing didn't sell off BCA's Wichita fuse fab to investment bankers back in 2005 as "Spirit". It's a pretty good name, since it's what some religions think is left behind after you're dead.
It isn't that Office is abusive or Windows is abusive, it's that Microsoft is.

Word '97 is still my favorite word processor ever. Windows 7 is one of my favorite operating systems. I don't think they're abusive.

What's abusive is how slow Office 365 is. What's abusive is how updates reset all my settings trying to make Office 365 bearable (don't use cloud, save to computer by default, don't show backstage, etc.). What's abusive is FORCING me to combine taskbar buttons on Windows 11. What's abusive (and unreliable) is randomly selecting the whole filename while I'm editing it when the file is on OneDrive.

And that's just the tip of the ice berg.
Author here. I tried KV first. It didn't work because of replication lag between edge nodes.
If I look at my camera lens when I'm talking and I look at the screen while you're talking, and then you do the same, then there's no issue. Am I the only one that does this? (I know the answer. I am. At least at my company, I am.)
I eliminated Firefox animations with a custom userChrome.css file. They are all gone.
> looking at excessive amounts of data to get a clue of what's going on.

Can you automate this by writing some code?
I think the algorithmic flight pricing has picked up on this.

I was seeing flights on 737 Max 8 were easily 10-20% cheaper compared to other models on a given route and date. The 737 Max 8 ended up being my most flown model in 2023.
Ok so I think I at least understand now that “git diff” isn’t just showing me some stored information in the repo’s metadata.

But still, I can’t reason about how so many changes to a repo can be recorded in a way that’s so efficient that it’s almost imperceptible in time cost. And I’ve yet to see a satisfactory answer to this question. I need concrete examples.
What phone? I've never owned one that took worse photos than a DSLR in auto mode under normal lighting
This is such an inherent safety issue though one would expect a multitude of things must go wrong (procedurally or otherwise) for this to happen.