skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> It can be done, but they're not the same as being in someone's private space.

Yeah. Let's put the kids to bed while we continue our meal. Oops, forgot to rent a crèche. Want to stay over and continue chatting? Oops, forgot to rent a hotel and the space closes at 11:00.
why wouldn't it fit into memory? the data set is only 12gb.
> Why are the needs of gamers more important than those of the elderly, for example?

Because in a capitalist society we allocate resources using money and market forces. And gamers are willing to spend more on technology than the elderly.
> I refuse to live my life as if these things aren't important to me. I refuse to average my entire life style down to my median day. My median day is boring.

Surprised nobody mentioned externalities yet. Carbon tax, and then you can take a more wholistic view when planning your life.

By the way, landscaping as a hobby does not automatically imply trucks, not outside US at least. Unless you actually do it often and need to transport large loads—then yeah, go for it. You’re part of a small minority that might actually need a truck.
Show HN: Varolio, AI App for Email and Sales Management
IBM z/Architecture has had hardware support for F128 since the 90s. It has been in ISO 754 since 2008, with support in both C/C++ and Fortran.
A Hadoop submission may help people realize that. But since you only have one machine to work with it should be obvious that you're not going to get any speed-up via divide and conquer.
If you read their account, they actually believe they would've made it there without stopping to charge, also they used a fast charging station on the trip which would've charged to 80% in 30 minutes (a much more usual break on a long 3 hour trip). Many people stop for lunch on their way to Kruger, I suspect they did this here.
Charging overnight on the slowest plug point in Kruger also delivered up to 210km range, double what they needed per day in Kruger.

It's not really an issue they were just extremely cautious, something you'd expect in South Africa if you know anything about their power grid.
I believe the author was actually trying to show it is actually feasible and range is not a concern.
> but for those whose actual need might well be to want to

And the authority for the people to decide their “actual” needs should be who exactly?
Maliciously changing a RIPE allocation would be like going into a pub and moving Geoff’s drink to one side so you and your mate can take his and Frank’s spot at the bar. While you may physically succeed at this, you will also find you don’t get served and you do get thrown out and barred.

I’ve always liked the professional level of collusion that makes the Internet work. One day it will all go wrong and we’ll have to set up something democratic, but until then the technocracy works well.
If nothing else, the takeaway here is you will suffer the same way elders are suffering today when in a couple decades you too grow old and become forgotten on the wayside by your kids' and grandkids' generations.

And when you speak of your plight then, you too will be handwaved away as you are doing right now to your elders.

If you aren't interested in bettering the lives of your elders, at least take away that bettering the lives of your elders today will also improve your own life when you too become an elder one day.

What goes around comes around.
There is but it only shows after about a second so that it doesn't flash up unnecessarily if the sound loads quickly
That was beautiful, thanks for sharing.
Furthermore this argument would favor plug-in hybrids, not fully electric cars.

If only 30 miles is required most of the times, why go with these big, heavy, expensive batteries when you need only a quarter of it. Something like the Chevrolet Volt would be perfect, fully covering the 93% case with its smaller battery, but for the remaining 7%, the gas engine gives it a better range than any fully electric car.

And for emissions, we are 93% there with a plug-in hybrid, so clearly that's the solution.

Except, maybe not... because there is another trick in that stat. Maybe 93% of the trips are less than 30 miles, but 93% of the miles driven are necessarily part of a trip that is more than 30 miles. Same thing for that "40 miles a day", it doesn't account for days where no driving happens. So it means that it you take a random car on the road, there is a good chance it is doing a longer trip than 30-40 miles.
I'm curious what situation you have in mind. I suppose if you wanted to calculate a rate, you would need to divide (integer) money by an (integer) time interval.
It's also missing the biggest point: no charger at home. I live in an apartment building, there are no chargers. I would be worried about my commute, since I would be driving to the other side of town for the rare public charger
The motivation behind choosing an EV is not because it's cheaper. People like the features, low pollution, low noise, the imagine, etc. Buying a car is very often not about making the best financial decision. E.g. in Europe, SUVs are now the most popular car model, even though they are more expensive, use more fuel, are more dangerous, noisy, polluting, etc.
The k solution is ,/+|(8#2)\textb

k doesn't have a right shift operator, but you don't need that, you can use the base encoding operator instead

Personally I think this is clearer than both the array-ish python and the list comp.

https://ngn.codeberg.page/k/#eJwrSa0oSbJSCs9ILFEA4gyFkoxUBbe...
I said that at my last place. It was a pain to clean and I wasn't getting any benefit out of the space (admittedly that might have been different had it not been lockdown and I'd been able to invite friends around).
In the 1984 movie Gremlins, the protagonist is warned not to feed the titular creatures (a type of transformer) after midnight, otherwise they promptly lose alignment and begin to hallucinate.
I don't drive, and instead spend what sometimes seems like a fortune on Uber. But in the UK the average monthly spend on a car is ~500GBP when include the amortized cost of the car itself.

Even when my son was swimming competitively and we had to Uber him around to 6 training sessions a week plus often competitions many miles away, I only briefly averaged 400GBP/month in total transport costs (though with the caveat that I work from home; had I commuted full time it'd have added ~200/month to get in to the centre of London, but then again I'd likely have spent that even if I had a car because commuting in to the centre with a car is a nightmare)

And I got to sit and relax and read or talk to my son or listen to music and not have to pay attention to the road.

I get that some enjoy the actual act of driving and/or driving a comfy, fancy car, but for many, it's a really expensive enjoyment and I suspect a lot of people have not considered just how much they could "paper over" edge cases and issues with public transport (yes, I know this is not a viable options for huge parts of the US) or choices like yours with Uber or rentals.
> In a perfect economy with 100% efficient utilization there will never be any waste or duplication of resources.

I guess I am just thinking about it from an urbanist point of view, and how our view of personal space and a relative lack of focus on publicly accessible community spaces affects our land use and exacerbates the housing crisis. I say this as someone in a family which has been in this country for generations, and probably focused too much on personal wealth and access to large homes. I am learning to appreciate the value of smaller private spaces and bigger public spaces as I have slowly moved from the country to a dense city throughout my life. I go to weekly gatherings with friends, but that's at the local hackerspace not at anyone's house.

I can see how from an immigrant background there is more focus on familial togetherness and I think that is a good cultural trait for us to encourage and support in city design. Though as a queer person my family is not who I want to spend time with on a weekly basis.
I wonder what percentage of Linux based devices are GPL compliant these days...
I guess I don't understand the advantage of having a truck over just doing Home Depot scheduled deliveries, if it's only a few times a year. He's paying like $1,000 for each of those two mulch runs, it's much cheaper just to pay someone else to deliver it to you in their truck, and I'd say it's a lot more convenient, since they're doing all the work there. What am I missing there?
I've not driven an EV, so I can't speak to that. But I have been in an ICE car that has run out of petrol (it was truly sitcom-worthy, with the infamous line "Don't worry, it always shows empty when it's got a 1/4 of a tank left" about a minute before the engine died), and this wasn't that far out from Sydney, and there are signs around here (east coast of AU) with how many km/minutes the next fuel stop is after the current one, so I'm not convinced that EV range concerns can't be managed in a similar way.
Thank you! I'm glad you like the design, I wasn't sure how it would go down
Car rental...
Talking from experience in such a case, malicious actor transfers IP range from entity A to intermediate entity B and then entity B sells that range to entity C.
Entity C obtained the asset on a perfectly legal way as they don't know and care how entity B got the asset. Nothing entity A can do then when they discover it, they can't get assets back plus RIPE also can't do anything since they only offer the tool for tracking such transactions they don't take part on them . If you want follow any legal process you want to be reimbursed from entity B and the malicious actor but you are not getting your IP range back
All you need to know about the new Artificial Intelligence Regulations for the European Union. How AI will be regulated to ensure safe use and technological innovation.
I think that would violate this rule

> The computation must happen at application runtime, i.e. you cannot process the measurements file at build time (for instance, when using GraalVM) and just bake the result into the binary
>Why would you buy an overpriced car?
There's kind of a technicality here.

There's several very specific and very rare traits that are present in some kohaku (they're not genetic, so we can't just breed for them) that are highly prized. Fish that meet those criteria and go for those prices are quite literally one in a million.

I can go buy a "pet quality" kohaku for under twenty bucks. Meanwhile, it's difficult to find any kind of Asian arrowana for under two thousand dollars.
You could, but this book doesn't, as far as I've skimmed.

It even makes the case as to why not:

> This usually means that there are an enormous number of possible executions, and testing can examine only a tiny fraction of them.
It's the difference between the evil maid attack (someone sneaks a keylogger into your turned-off machine whilst cleaning your room) vs local privilege escalation (the sysadmin installs a game and now your entire network is owned).
Most RV parks have 40-50 amps available, which makes overnight charging more practical
>The whole "mystery" of transformer is that instead of a linear sequence of static weights times values in each layer, you now have 3 different matrices that are obtained from the same input through multiplication of learned weights, and then you just multiply the matrices together. I.e more parallelism which works out nice, but very restrictive since the attention formula is static.

That's not it at all. What's special about transformers is they allow each element in a sequence to decide which parts of data are most important to it from each other element in the sequence, then extract those out and compute on them. The big theoretical advantage over RNNs (which were used for sequences prior to transformers), is that transformers support this in a lossless way, as each element has full access to all the information in every other element in the sequence (or at least all the ones that occurred before it in time sequences). RNNs and "linear transformers" on the other hand compress past values, so generally the last element of a long sequence will not have access to all the information in the first element of the sequence (unless the RNN internal state was really really big so it didn't need to discard any information).
If you asked 100 people, literally everyone would agree Arnold Schwarzenegger is more attractive than Danny Devito. For people in the middle it's a bit more subjective but there are people that are more or less attractive.
So they send a probe to search for life on Venus (Venus Life Finder) but this is a private company [0]. What is their angle? What is the return on investment?

This article [0] from September 2022 mention a planned launched in May 2023. Now they say January 2025.

Is it a publicity stunt?

Apparently, their working on this on their spare time:

> According to the head of Rocket Lab Peter Beck, the mission to Venus is a project that is carried out by the company at night and on weekends. It is constantly pushed into the background, but engineers continue to work on it. [1]

How serious is this thing?

[0] https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/3636322-rocket-lab-to...

[1] https://universemagazine.com/en/rocket-lab-announces-a-new-l...
They'll keep depressing down other employees wages to continue increasing their wages at the top to "aTRact THe bESt taLeNt".
And availability, one who rented a car in a peak season knows it well.
Only Tesla does that.
tl;dr The infographic misrepresents its own data source. The following is how I proved this to myself in roughly stream-of-consciousness how I followed what was happening.

I had questions about how this is averaged... I know that in Seattle schools start after 8:50am. But it has Washington as a dark orange.

But given that Washington's 2 most populous urban areas (Encompassing Spokane, Seattle, and Tacoma) both start their schools after 8:40am, I'm wonder how this has Washington as averaging 7:56am to 8:05am.

Additionally, the more I check the counties in Washington, the more I doubt that this is correct. School start times seem to be consistently after 8:30am, which would align with what I know about the state.

So I looked at their source: https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ntps/tables/ntps1718_table_05_s1...

And their information for Washington is just wrong, from their own source. It's also for the years 2017-2018.
Which one did you drive?
Yes. I still remember Optimus Prime and Bumblebee from my youth.
> I'm not misrepresenting what you said, I'm refuting it.

I think you're distorting what I said, actually. What I said was that it is reasonable to believe that the tweets are disruptive, not that everything which impacts the stock price or even the operations of the business is relevant to working conditions.

I can understand how that may not have been clear on a first reading, but after I pointed this out and asked you to review what I said, I do think that should have been clear to you.

> I've read the letter, nowhere does the phrase "hostile work environment" appear.

I don't know if you maybe didn't see this edit because of how HN works, but I did clarify that already:

> (To be clear, they never say the words "hostile work environment," that is my interpretation.)

They are pretty clearly describing a work environment which is hostile. They're saying that they don't have clarity about what the policies are, that their work is interrupted, and that the lack of clarity causes rules to be enforced inconsistently. Call that whatever you want and it's still relevant to working conditions.

> It sounds much more like a small group of employees are demanding that management implement DEI policies

That's a complete misreading. Where did you even get that? The document has 3 calls to action and none of them are about DEI. They mention the workplace, as it exists, is diverse. That's all I can see and it's completely tangential. (By the way, the phrase "DEI" doesn't appear in the letter, either.)

> But they weren't fired for discussing it.

They literally were.

> "11. About June 16, 2022, Respondent, by Gwynne Shotwell, in an email to all employees announced that employees had been discharged for their involvement in the Open Letter."

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38862605

https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CPT.3...

> At some point I think management is allowed to make a decision about whether they're going to implement a policy or not.

At no point does management get the ability to fire people for protected speech, or does the speech stop being protected. Just because management says "no" doesn't mean employees have to stop advocating for themselves.
> Md5 is just as fine as any other generic hash function if its being used as a non-unique key

MD5 brings the feature that you'll forever be explaining why you chose a function that had already been broken for 30 years when other options were readily available.
I took great care to multiple times make clear that the choice is yours, that your needs might not be suited for this, and that whatever works for you is fine. Exactly what made you think I was implying the person to decide what works for you should be anyone but you?
When my ICE car is getting low on fuel, which happens quite often because the tank isn't that big and I tend to avoid filling up when the prices are high (they vary a lot here), I also have to micromanage the A/C and anything else, because they consume just as much energy as they do in an EV car, and that comes from the gasoline. It's most definitely not something I "don't have to care about". It's actually more of a concern because when my car is low on fuel it's very hard to know exactly how much is left - is it half a liter, two, or three? There are way fewer fueling stations than in the past, so getting there also takes fuel. At least with an EV I could have charged at home or at work or at the shopping mall.. well, I'll stay with my ICE car for a while more but that's because there are other good things about it which aren't yet available for EVs, but I do wish it was an EV.
I’m afraid these calculations are more tuned to sweetheart deals the car manufacturer has with the infrastructure owner than to my best interests.
Yet, EV sales are record high.
> I could see being annoyed that they're _marketed_ into over sized solutions that aren't actually correct for their use case

Yeah, it's really not the thing itself that's annoying. It's just knowing that it's an unconventional opinion and I'm not going to change anyone's minds on it and I better just keep it to myself to be polite. Not the end of the world of course, but slightly frustrating.

If I were writing the post again, I'd definitely take the 'annoying' sentence out of it.
I love the design and look of this website. Apparently it's based on custom written wiki software.
Exactly. The insight in this thread into how solitary (I would say lonely, one-dimensional) some HN users' lives are has shocked me.

I'm not going to go to the room you rented at a local business, bring a six pack of interesting beers to try together, bring my baby that my friends have been so excited to meet and play with, etc. My friends who like weed aren't going to show up. Not to mention holidays, the hardest time to rent public spaces and the most likely time for friends to gather...
You mean CarPlay? I worried about that before getting a model y, and it was really unfounded. If anything Tesla’s is better (at worst equal). I love not plugging in my phone every time (no maps on Bluetooth with CarPlay). Maybe turo a Tesla for a few days before making up your mind
This is one of the great things about car share services or sites like turo, and why it's great Airbnb is in gasp residential neighbourhoods.
Impressive. Also hilarious that this kennel is probably better optimized than a lot of big logistics companies. ;0)

I think arbitary weightings are unavoidable when optimizing 'soft' (social) problems like kennel allocation or seating plans. The optimal solution is not well defined.
I build a static analyzer in my spare time and read a bunch of +fravia in my youth, so I have some familiarity with the space but I'm not an expert so I could be completely off here: I wonder if the LLM advances we've seen recently could be used to improve the state of the art in structuring?

As in, could you abstract away the CFG and feed it into an LLM trained on a bunch of CFGs and corresponding ASTs? Especially given that the LLM could be trained on a lot of code that may very well have been reused in the code being decompiled. Even if not the same code, the same algorithms may be similar enough to improve the structuring output.
That seems weird.

Edit: Just looked up Porsche and they have it too. They call it "Intelligent range optimiser". Can't be asked to check more brands.
It’s easy to solve but even fizzbuzz becomes complicated if you want double digit GB/s output.
I'm not disputing that they were fired for the letter, I'm disputing that the letter is a protected discussion of workplace conditions.
Is it really so bad to say that a lot of people should do certain things differently than they do? Like, if I said more Americans should get more exercise and eat less junk food, would that be a horrible thing for me to say?
There's sun.misc.Unsafe which is a builtin that gives you raw read/write. Turn that into ROP, mmap your native program, and now you're full native :)
It's this: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005692235592.html
> you could host them at a fancy restaurant, with better food and the ability to spend the entire evening with the guests instead of in the kitchen.

Not everyone has a five star restaurant down the street.
Well, it helps that ants don't question their overlords.
I play a very lengthy white noise mp3 in VLC for my (baby) needs. Just works in all situations.
That is correct. They should be taken Into account. However, Politics is the process of weighing the against cost and tradeoffs. Science can say if later sleep is better for learning. It can't tell you about f better learning is worth it
The Tailwind CSS Admin Dashboard HTML Template is user-friendly. It adapts seamlessly to diverse screen sizes. This ensures responsiveness and compatibility across all contemporary browsers.

This template boasts a versatile design and it incorporates all essential features. This straightforward HTML Website Template is the perfect choice for starting a project. It leverages the Tailwind CSS framework.

One of its key highlights lies in its developer-friendly approach. It offers easily customizable features through highly readable and extensively documented code. This eliminates the need for advanced programming skills. It makes an accessible and feature-rich Tailwind CSS admin dashboard template.

Some compelling features include custom layouts and an attractive design. It also has a search bar and cross-browser compatibility. Also, it includes authentication and a diverse array of UI components. Furthermore, the menu, notifications, buttons, table UI, detailed documentation, etc are its important elements.

Notable Features of the Tailwind CSS Admin Dashboard HTML Template:
Over 80 diverse component examples
More than 13 modern UI application pages
Tailwind CSS and HTML5
Sidebar Navigation
Attractive table designs
Layout customization
Notifications UI design
100% responsiveness
Quick developer support
Detailed documentation
Cross-browser compatibility
Clean and organized codebase
Web application pages include
Profile
Settings
Billing
Pricing
404 error
Authentication processes
Sign-in & sign-up
Forget password
Integration with libraries and plugins
Gulp
Google Fonts
Tailwind CSS
Dropzone
Feather Icons
Simplebar
The experts: artists on 20 easy, mind-expanding ways to be much more creative
In that case, I'd strongly advise anyone doing the same, to have enough fuel to cover 800km and some. If that means you have to lug 80L in jerry cans, so be it, because in such situations you cannot assume that those gas stations even have fuel, or it could be closed for the weekend. It would seriously suck to be stuck there for a few days because you do not have more fuel.