skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
dynamically rewriting JavaScript into not JavaScript as it evolves into a full programming language is an overhead that has its pros and cons.

A build system for a simple hello world page is the example I can’t often wipe from my mind.

Reactivity in web apps has been great but around for 20 years already from its roots in Ajax.
But would they sell to Russia/China which is in opposition to their biggest sponsor - the USA? The answer is obviously: if they can get away with it. Personally it seems more likely to be US but that's just a gut feeling.
how are you looking for new jobs?
Kind of nice for a company to wait until after the holiday season. It's always a bummer when the companies announce these plans in mid December.
> usually people go the other direction

I'm not sure that's true. Time has went that direction, for sure, but I don't think historical backend web devs have migrated to react. Mostly front-end devs expanding their horizons and younger devs starting there.
This is awesome! There are a lot of projects trying to duplicate this but very few have the polish, especially on the creation side.

Selfishly, I’d love support for the lower power eINK devices, like the InkPlate series which has a built in ESP32, but this is making me consider swapping them to a Pi.
"no known bugs" is technically the same as "may contain unknown bugs"
Mental illnesses also physically alter brain chemistry and anorexia is arguably far more damaging than heroin. Someone can remain addicted to heroin/opiates for decades whilst still being part of society (it tends to be either impurities or inconsistent quality of heroin that causes deaths). It's unlikely that someone will continue suffering from anorexia for a decade.
Whales likewise very rarely get cancer, and in general while larger individuals of the same species have a higher risk of cancer, larger animals in general don't get more cancer. It's called Peto's Paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peto%27s_paradox
The amount of hate for GPL on HN is disturbing.
Tangential, but do any authors apply the same techniques promoted by software developers for honing their craft? e.g. instead of trying to write the next great American novel you focus on writing a lot of short stories and then analyze them for market fit and expand on the ones that have legs?
Depend on how you look at it. There are definitely higher chances of a cell becoming a cancer cell when there are more of them. But as the rate become too high in very large animals, they evolved mechanisms to fight it and these are so effective they are more resistant to cancer than apes like humans.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325178
I don't disagree with you, but to give a bit of colour to the counterargument, as I understand it, we now have maybe 5 decades of experience which suggests that the "sharing" approach doesn't work at scale. In general, if you want to see wildlife in western Europe you go to a nature reserve, not a farm, because "spared" land will have nature but "shared" land increasingly won't. Of course there are some individual farmers who are doing great work and bucking that trend, but so far no one has found a magic formula that allows land to both be subject to intensive agriculture, and also support historically normal levels of wildlife. Or maybe someone has, but if so they've failed to convince farmers to adopt it unilaterally, or governments to impose it as policy.

So arguably the evidence we have is that if you consider only things that farmers like to be politically practical, then we're likely to see wildlife declines continue indefinitely.

That is of course why many people are looking for solutions that don't depend on the consent of the agricultural industry. One approach is to go over their heads and appeal directly to government e.g. the biodiversity COP agreement requiring 30% of land to be set aside for nature. Another is to hope that technological breakthroughs (e.g. precision fermentation) can fundamentally alter consumer demand for food products in a way that makes them much less land intensive (primarily by cutting out meat and other animal products, which use a disproportionate amount of land when farmed extensively, and produces a disproportionate amount of pollution when farmed intensively).

Of course, in the short term, the practical answer is "do both, wherever possible". Conservation organisations should be encouraged to purchase land so that it can be managed directly for wildlife. Farmers should be encouraged to adopt wildlife-friendly practices as much as possible. Governments should be encouraged to consider wildlife conservation a goal in itself when designing incentive schemes for the agriculture industry, and the taxpayers who directly fund much agriculture through subsidies should be encouraged to hold them accountable for their progress in this area.

Easier said than done, of course, but as the original article makes clear, the status quo is chronic failure, and there's no reason to suppose that can be changed within the current paradigm.
While I agree that React has become too bloated, productivity wise I can't see anything like this (or something similar) replacing React.

Yeah, we need something lightweight, but not this.
Being poor doesn't lead you to becoming a criminal. The evidence we have for that is the vast numbers of poor people who are not criminals.

Being taught that everyone is against you, that you are a victim, and that you are being oppressed does lead to crime, however. In other words, the current fashion for leftist politics is to supply justifications for stealing, so long as you steal from someone who has more than you do.
> ″The shift to a business unit operating model is a continuation of our client-focused, balanced execution priorities and is designed to accelerate product and services, go-to-market, and corporate functions’ operating efficiencies across all geographies we serve,” Xerox CEO Steven Bandrowczak said in the release.

Gosh, I really feel like I understand the rationale and the forward plan now.
Corporations can, not people. Maybe because the size of revenue from both groups.
So everything-is-a-file is a bit like REST - restrict the verbs, and move the complexity that causes into the addressing scheme and the clients.
About gun control and freedom, I have the following opinion:

We need to be realistic. The only way armed citizenry can fight against a powerful government is through guerrilla warfare/terrorism. You're not going to fight a professional army that comes with ISR capabilities, air assets, artillery and heavy weapons by assembling a ragtag of your subdivision patriots while counting on the prowess of the hunting ability of Mr. Eckhardt in a tree to snipe the "enemy" officers. This makes good post-apocalyptic fiction, entertaining movies but it would mean the complete obliteration of your group, all of your family and all your neighbours with just a few artillery shells. Any kind of stand by civilians against a professional army from the most powerful military in the world could only have one result, and it would not be good for the "citizen's militia".

So, the only credible scenario for fighting an occupier/tyrannic government/alien invaders, as proved by countless examples in history of liberation movements facing a far more powerful enemy, would be good old terrorism (once you win, if you win, presumably you can call it freedom fighting), sabotage and other such hit and run tactics.

And once someone crosses this bridge, they don't give a fuck if they can buy their guns at Costco or in the back of van in a dark alley. Indeed, buying in the dark alley is preferred.

Nobody is going to fight the government using legally bought guns while using their government provided callsigns to communicate using their legally licensed ham radios.

So, legal gun ownership as a safeguard against an oppressive government is a fucking illusion, a feel-good excuse to have cool (even if dangerous) toys.

Revolutions and insurrections are made by people who don't give a flying fuck about laws and the current order, and 99 times out of 100, they lose and die in mostly horrible ways.
Isn't the whole point that it's something we might not predict from what we understand about the materials so far? Why would it be likely that a simulation would do better than theory at predicting unknown experimental results?

You might hit on some interesting interactions between known properties that haven't been investigated but I would assume the real interesting results are from things we just don't know to model, or how to model.
Author(s) of this may be the type of people to not use a library because it has a lot of open github issues
By running OpenBSD as a workstation you already made sure what 99% wouldn't connect with you /redditmode

This guide is partly Security 101, partly for a localhost admin. Things are different when you run an organization with a centrally managed catalogue. Or you are sane and have a clear picture of the attack vectors.

Least privilege? Yes, of course.

Drop inbound by default? Yes, of course and it's amazing how many self-titled Linux Administrators insist what the machine should be 'secure from start so no firewall is needed'. Also this guide implies a workspace which questions what exactly kind of malicious traffic a [single] OpenBSD machine in the network would receive.

Drop outbound by default? Yes and BTW it's pretty easy on Windows, because the Windows Defender Firewall (what a mouthful) is pretty capable to filter by an application, not just by IPs and ports, so you don't need this SOCKS ersatz app firewall.

> Live in a temporary file-system

Now this is just ridiculous. As other said this is Silk Road level of paranoia.

> Disable webcam and microphone

Don't connect them in the first place?

> Disabling USB ports

See the temporary file-system. Good luck finding a notebook with PS/2 or serial ports.

> auto-updating the packages and base system daily on a computer is the minimum that should be done everywhere

Oh god.

> 10.1. Specialized proxies §

> It could be possible to have different proxy users, with each restriction to the remote ports allowed, we could imagine proxies like

> Of course, this is even more tedious than the multipurpose proxy, but at least, it's harder for a program to guess what proxy to use, especially if you don't connect them all at once.

Now this is what bugs me most of this guide.

If you already allowed something to run on your machine then it is usually too late for security through obscurity exercises. Most of the things advised here would just make your life miserable and would lead to disabling or shortcutting them.
Nowadays I would add lines of code and syntax complexity to the benchmark. It is apples and oranges comparison but you could prefer clarity than performance depending on the circumstances. Also, it is relatively easy to do with today language tools.
I generally agree with you. If you want classical algorithms (which are, imo, fundamental), you can't go wrong start with Skiena's "Algorithm Design Manual" or lecture notes: https://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~skiena/

> the SciPy ecosystem, Jupyter Notebooks

These, though, are gems that can be dramatic quality-of-life improvements for all kinds of data analysis. I resisted for a while (writing code in a web browser? BARF), but have gradually come to have a deep affection for pandas, numpy, scipy, seaborn, etc. They're quirky, their APIs are sometimes a bit strange and unintuitive, but they make data analysis tasks go so much quicker. I'm not a data scientist; most days I'm more of a systems programmer. Being able to take log files, write a bit of Python glue to transform them into Pandas Dataframes, and then slice-and-dice-and-plot different facets of the data rapidly is a game changer.
People will blame the technology for making it worse. But I think we have always had a problem and it's cultural and systemic, not technological.

It seems there are two extremes. Either you shut up or go to prison in some countries, or you say ANYTHING you want about the other political candidates in other countries, regardless of how misleading it is.

I think it comes from the core paradigm which is essentially a type of "controlled" civil war.

I'm not advocating for the opposite which is along the lines of authoritarianism, but it seems that "democracy" has taken this to an extreme level. It's as if all of the popularity contest stunts and vicious gossip from middle school have become enshrined in the political system.

I also have a hard time understanding how obviously declining senior citizens continue to be the best options for leadership.
How is this still on the HN front page 10 hours after being posted with the most damning comment thread I've ever seen?
Nuclear fusion will power the first useful quantum computer.
So how do I find you guys? Because that's the biggest problem between the two of us. It should be based on my reading history, but goodreads is pretty useless, storygraph is better but still not that great.

I've been recently finding most good books by lengthy talks with GPT4 since I can explain in detail what I want, what I enjoyed and what I didn't, but that only works for books which are already popular (and even with old books, there are some great ones which are niche enough to never become really popular).
Musk has had an outsized impact on the world and many people want to know more about the type of person that can pull that off in our current climate. I love historical biographies but they aren’t as relatable as contemporary works.
No serious organization is going to deploy pure, non-hybrid PQC, as Bernstein tacitly acknowledges when he lists essentially all the major deployments of PQC in production to date, all of which are hybrids.
Typo: It's important to priority quality and consistency over QUANTITY
They have hundreds of contributors and they don't audit them. This is not a blackbox reimplementation.
I thought both Ada and rust have good compile time checks for memory safety that eliminates the need for run time checks?
It's actually not. There's a reason there are a lot of hydrogen storage projects for electricity generation going on.
This - these aren't hopeful people with a layman's understanding cheering on the scientific method, they're hype bros looking to gather gullible followers and shill cryptocurrencies to them based on yet another thing they're utterly clueless about and don't care to inform themselves on.
Those "twitter gurus" were actively trying to recreate the paper, and a lot of those "twitter gurus" are actual founders doing actual hardtech startups with relevant degrees and labs.
Is your resting heart rate under 70bpm? Can you run 2 miles in 18 minutes? If not, you could use some cardio. If only so you can breathe when you get COVID.
This has NO business being this fun, you sunnofabitch!
For Nvidia users, just install the drivers via the runfile provided by Nvidia. Never had an issue this way.

Granted I install dkms and do an autohook to install the modules on kernel updates, which I wager is a bit much for most.
Figuring out where the chasm is can be tricky though. If we're going to see S-curve adoption, we might be at the beginning of a rocket (maybe a small one a la crossing the chasm), but it's hard to say.

I think as market share goes up, there's going to be more polished product providers offering linux (liek Steam OS), and that's going to make it very reachable to the pragmatists.
Location: Poland (Warsaw)

Remote: Yes (EST time zone ok)

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: .NET (ASP, WPF, EF, others), GraphQL, Rest, Modular monolith, Microservices, Desktop, DDD, CQRS, Clean/Onion architecture, relational and document DBs, Azure.

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/micha%C5%82-cz%C4%99czek-b843a18...

Email: michalczeczek@gmail.com

---

An experienced (9+ YOE) developer who has worked across many technologies, from embedded (mainly C), through desktop (WPF) to web/cloud. I have experience of managing projects and people as a Software Architect with success and very positive feedback. I focus on real business needs and requirements and translate them into clean and simple software and architecture, carefully considering direct and indirect technical/people/process dependencies.
> Then do not hide it behind the "people just want to scratch their own itch"

You seem to be latching on to individual sentences in individual posts rather than understanding the thread from my initial post downwards. Start from the top and see if that changes.

Right from the beginning I was walking about people not releasing source for this reason, not releasing with expectations of control – while quoting more of the preceding thread might have made that sentence look less like an attempt to hide as you see it, that would bulk out the thread necessarily IMO (and I'm already being too wordy) given that the context is already readily available nearby (as the thread is hardly a long one).

> > it would be much easier to just not open up.

> Agreed. But like I said: you can not have both ways. If you want to "keep control" and prevent …

No, but the other end of the equation often wants the source irrespective of the project creator not being ready to let go of fuller control just yet (for whatever reason, including wanting to get to a certain point their way to stamp their intended direction on it). And they will nag, and the author will either spend time replying to re-explain their (possibly already well documented) position or get a reputation for not listening which might harm them later.
You can bet that if Kaspersky dares to uncover this in that much detail and with so much publicity, then revealing those details doesn’t go against the interests of the Russian state. (Which, to be very clear, is not the same thing as suggesting Kaspersky is an actor of the state. Just that they would wisely think twice about revealing attacks from a certain direction.)
I assume the datacenter has been powered by the grid so far though? Or did it have its own generators? What's the advantage of colocating the fuels cells and the datacenter? We already know fuel cells produce electricity and we know that datacenters run on electricity. From all I can tell this is just some kind of marketing ploy and nothing novel whatsoever.
Tl;dr: copy and paste ruined our business.
Location: DC metro area (Maryland, US)

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Node, TypeScript, React, Docker, Docker Compose, Kubernetes, AWS Lambda

Résumé/CV: https://keithwade.com/about/

Email: keith (at) keithwade.com

I am a fullstack typescript developer with 7+ years of experience. Team tech lead experience. Rust and Go curious.

Deeply interested in technical excellence and making things better for users and coworkers.
Apparently the author has it out for import statements.

"No import dumpster at the top of each file. Forget imports even existed. Just access whatever you want, wherever you want. TypeScript knows where to find it."

This is a bizarre preference. Is there some reason the JS community has turned against explicitly listing what libraries are used by a module?
I reference mainstream media because it has mainstream mindshare, increasingly moving to social media.
We should not punish savers. This "wealth redistribution" talk is bollocks.
Not that we are aware of. The security model of Android and iOS also makes it much easier to implement biometric unlock correctly.
Thank you, but this is way too depressing.

Why start it with every terminal session? This could have been a desktop app.
Paper books have legal value - you have rights to resell it, for instance, that you don't have for ebooks. Until we unfuck those, ebooks will never completely replace them.

Paper books aren't particularly environmentally wasteful - if you buy one extra electronic device (say, an ereader), that basically outstrips the damage of any number of books you'd buy. That might not be relevant to the perception, though.

Books as expensive wallpaper will definitely keep being a thing while dead-tree books are common, but they're fundamentally about conveying an impression, and impressions can change - if ebooks become the overwhelming majority to the point that office decoration is the main point of books, then anyone who sees the bookshelf will assume you're a poser doing it for the image, and thus people will stop doing it. So wallpaper-bookshelves can't exist as a sole purpose of books (probably).
for dashboard software like this are there any reliable techniques to prevent burn-in? I'd like to set up a large screen with a dashboard but I don't want to wreck the screen
>it's unlikely that aircraft are being flown without good reason

You mean like picking up a billionaire?
I start every sesh with:

fortune | cowsay | lolcat
See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38783112
The difference is CdI had a destructive civil war from 2004 to 2011, and failed political and economic institutions in the 1980s and 1990s. Félix Houphouët-Boigny created a command economy that rested on commodity extraction (yes, command economies aren't only a Communist thing).

On the other hand, countries like Vietnam, China, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, and South Korea listened to the IMF in the 1990s and worked on reforming institutions.

CdI's economy only recently started to get on track after Ouattara came to power. It didn't hurt that he is an actual trained economist who has worked at the IMF and WB.

> being adjacent to PRC

French investment in the CdI in the 1960-70s is similar to Chinese and Korean investment in Vietnam in 2023, and American, Japanese, and Korean investment in China in the 1990s and 2000s

The PRC's GDP per Capita didn't catch up to CdI until 2005 when their civil war entered full gear.

The only difference is CdI's institutional capacity was crap compared to plenty of similarly poor Asian countries in the 1990s (China, Vietnam, India)

The Phillipines is a similar story as well btw. In 1990 Phillipines and Turkiye had the same standard of living. In 2023, Türkiye's HDI caught up with Hungary and most of Central Europe, while Phillipines fell behind Vietnam and Indonesia - two countries that have historically been much poorer than PH.
To discover than a particular LLM is able to output verbatim a sections of NYT works when queried in certain ways is different from explicitly publishing a set of NYC works... i think.

OpenAI does not distribute it models, so the violation of copywrite if found to be a violation will be limited to the amount of people who queried the LLM in the same way that NYT did.
I think it's a wash - some people would rather know before the holidays because they're filled with a lot of discretionary spending (travel, gifts) that are easy to cut in case of job loss. There's really no good time to fire someone.
Not sure there is much evidence for that historically.
The frame you referenced has a Pi Pico build in. FrameOS needs at least a Pi Zero.
The person you're responding to, themselves a cryptography engineer, was, famously, one of his students.
To be fair, we already have a name for the Web, we don't need REST too for the same thing.
You need to fix your form regardless of program. 5x5 is fine, along with many other programs. If you want to gain size, it's more about eating than anything else. If you're new, you can do almost anything consistently and you'll get gains.

The reason 5x5 is recommended so often is almost everyone will benefit from more strength. After a full cycle of 5x5, any other programs you do will benefit from the strength base you built. 5x5 of the big lifts also limits people wasting time on things like curls.
It's also well known the driver is massive because there are hundreds of thousands of lines of auto-generated register access code in there. Not because it's inherently very complex.