skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Man furnishes no exception to the rule. He seems to add the treachery and deceit that the other animals in the main do not practice, to all the other cruelties that move his life. Man has made himself master of the animal world and he uses his power to serve only his own ends. Man, at least, kills helpless animals for the pleasure of killing, alone. He breeds horses and dogs, and fixes a gala day which is a society occasion when both men and women dress for the event, whereupon they turn loose a puny fox and set on its trail a pack of hounds trained for the chase. The noble men and women, riding at a mad pace, follow over hill and dale until, after hours of effort, the exhausted fox is unable longer to escape them, and with great glee they see it torn to pieces by the hounds.

Darwin making a convincing case for our unbounded "human" capacity of cruelty against other animals. The fact that he is describing the practices of the aristocracy is also very relevant because every human being in the "developed" world today lives like an aristocrat and commits so many atrocities throughout the day that it would be impossible to catalogue them all.

This is why building the "panoptic computronium cathedral"™ is a moral imperative. I can get it all done for a mere $80B so tell all your friends about it. This is a bargain deal for saving the soul of humanity.
Which position? In the video she simply embedded an interesting anecdote into textbook knowledge. Don't know what the flagged comment said though.
Cake Equity - https://www.cakeequity.com/
I quoted to you from the filing where this was described. Read that again and the whole filing itself. Not that it will matter, because you’re just doing what Mr. Imaginary Janitors did now, trying to ignore and elide the facts of the case, as well as the NLRB’s ruling about them, to invent a scenario where you’re right. Be careful doing this though, unless you want to end up with a lot of imaginary friends in the building trades, providing you with fictitious legal advice.
Definitely clickhouse ecosystem.

- For querying csv data from command line, I use clickhouse-local.

- For querying csv data programmatically using a library, I use chdb (embedded version of clickhouse)

- For querying large amount of csv data programmatically, I offload it to clickhouse cluster which can do processing in distributed fashion.

If you are looking from query performance perspective, this blog is useful: https://www.vantage.sh/blog/clickhouse-local-vs-duckdb
Airplanes are inherently much, much less reliable than cars and only reach reliability through however many millions or billions of dollars worth of redundant systems and maintenance intervals and however many man-hours. That means that when you get on an airplane, you are extremely reliant on those systems and processes having been followed.

We are seeing more and more that these systems and processes have been breaking down, from regulation to manufacturing to pilots to systems to maintenance.

It really is hard to compare, but for an airplane, a passenger has to have faith that literally hundreds of thousands of people and things have done their job correctly. When I drive my car, I am much less reliant on people, systems, and processes, as cars are just plain simple. Most leople barely change their oil or check tire pressure. I even once had a complete engine failure and was able to just roll to a stop from highway speeds. Furthermore, I am in control. If I am too tired, I don't drive. I can pay attention to other drivers. I am directly responsible for maintenance. Etc.

I think it's hard to compare airplanes to cars by numbers alone. There are subtleties that are not exposed by numbers.

For an airplane passenger, it is absolutely a risk. You rely on so much happening correctly, and you are not in control of any of it. As little bits in that chain of things that need to happen don't happen correctly, percentages of failure and death go way up, and fast.

And we haven't even discussed in-flight medical emergencies, as there are actually quite a few in-flight deaths every year that would likely not yield a death if the medical emergency happened on the ground.

> There has not been a single US airline fatality since 2009.

Wikipedia says there has been 51, not counting private or military. And that list doesnt include American aircraft flying overseas, to which the MAX planes would add hundreds.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatal_accidents_and_...
"Jim".padStart(4) has existed in JS (and Node) for 6 years now.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...
> milk-v duo ... no wifi tho

Look no further than the BL808, a rather similar chip that has WIFI/BT. Available in the Sipeed M1s Module and Pine64 Ox64. It also has a 64 bit core that runs Linux (and 64 MB in-package RAM), and two smaller cores, the smallest dedicated to running the WIFI/BT.

Or the BL602/BL604, which are more like the ESP32. Off the shelf boards include the Pine64 PineCone and Sipeed BL602 EVB. Lup Yuen Lee has written extensively about how to run Apache NuttX RTOS on these.

All the above are RISC-V.

> risc-v or especially arm is a much nicer way

I agree on the "Arm" but not the "especially".

First off, do you mean ARM7TDMI, ARMv6 (original Pi and Zero), ARMv6-M (Cortex-M0 e.g. Pi Pico), ARMv7-M (Cortex-M3), ARMv7-A (early Pi 2), ARMv8-A (Pi 3 and later)? There are significant differences between all of them. The first two support similar versions of both the original ARM ISA and also Thumb1. The Pi Pico supports Thumb1 with a couple of added CSR instructions (only). Pi 2 supports Thumb2 and original ISA. Pi 3 and later support the 64 bit ISA, and also the standard and Thumb2 32 bit ISAs.

I'd recommend beginners to learn either original fixed length 32 bit opcode ARMv6 (or earlier), or else Thumb1. Both have their good points, but also bad. Individual instructions in A32 are quite complex to understand, between predication, condition codes, "free" shifts, and it has quite a lot of different instruction formats. Thumb1 has much simpler instructions, similar to other ISAs, but has a quite restricted set of instructions, it's fiddly to use registers 8-12, and it had even more different instruction formats.

Thumb2 is just a huge complex mess. Arm64 is also hugely complex.

In comparison RISC-V is simplicity itself, with only four basic instruction formats in RV32I/RV64I and about half as many instructions as even Thumb1, yet it allows you to efficiently do anything. You can use RVC's shorter opcodes or not, as you wish. The register set is totally uniform (except x0). Moving between 32 bit and 64 bit doesn't require learning a different ISA, just a different register size.

But for sure the Arm mess is better than the x86 mess.
yes, but this means that if you divide people into those with controversial opinions, and those without, you should direct 100% of your listening to the first group. at some point you will have to be more selective than that, but that's clearly the first step
Using current U.S. numbers [1][2]: average electricity price is $0.162/kWh, might be cheaper off peak or with solar roof; average gas price is $3.083/gal ($0.815/L) for regular, and $3.885/gal ($1.026/L) for premium which is recommended for your Volvo.

So, with regular gas:

75L + 50kWh: 75 * 0.815 + 50 * 0.162 = 69.225
75L + 10kWh: 75 * 0.815 + 10 * 0.162 = 63.525

A difference of 10.3%.

With premium gas:

75L + 50kWh: 75 * 1.026 + 50 * 0.162 = 85.050
75L + 10kWh: 75 * 1.026 + 10 * 0.162 = 78.570

A difference of 8.2%.

You failed to mention it's the gas part that's frigging expensive.

[1] https://www.energybot.com/electricity-rates/

[2] https://gasprices.aaa.com/
Oliver Stone’s “Nuclear Now” film was very optimistic about small reactors. Not sure if it interviewed this company or another?
Look, I’d love it if there were American cities like Copenhagen. But there aren’t any, and it’s some serious cope to blame that on republicans, seeing as how a republican couldn’t get elected dog catcher in these places.
Thank you for answering, especially when so many doenvoted. Now I know!

It does appear that Boeing tries to get away with "you've approved it for MAX <x>, so just approve it already for MAX <y>".
Th best code comment story was told by Joe Armstrong " Robert Virding, who developed Erlang with me, was famed for his comment. Singular. The entire stuff he wrote had one comment: in the middle of the pattern-match compiler there was a single line saying ‘and now for the tricky bit".
If anyone is looking for this, it's at the end of episode 30 from season 3.
these two constructs are completely unrelated except for using the same keyword
Source? Not very familiar with Twain, but fallen creation has been in the Judeo-Christian sphere for a long time. I assumed that's what he would have been influenced by.
Feature request -- please make it possible to bookmark or share a link with my selected timezones. Thanks for building it! super useful
> There are many types of diversity and in the US only eight are protected.

Indeed. When people call for more diverse corporate boards, they don't mean "we need more plumbers in there". They mean "we need more of the same evil, soulless, corrupt nihilists, just with different physical traits".

Which essentially unmasks the whole concept as a farce.
The one that she articulates at 7:10 onwards in the video. Starting with "What does this all means? it means that Quantum gravity just might..."
> they care about their customers

> It took me multiple calls with customer representative to cancel my account because Carta did not want to automatically add an option for people to cancel their plan.

This is not how most people would describe "care about [...] customers."
> i also find it fascinating US gov and private entity are having open dialogs like this, albeit with thinly veiled threats and PR grandstanding.

Isn’t this exactly how democracy is supposed to work?
But the caterpillars are hardly benign entities. They can decimate crops and cause famine, or even destroy entire forests if left unchecked. I'm in total agreement that nature a fucked up system - not pretty in its many machinations. But I struggle to see how parasitism is all that different than other types of predation in this regard.
This is not a problem in Hinduism but with Christianity.
Wasn’t this all debunked?
Several board members confirmed his drug use affecting his work performance off the record.

And you’re blaming Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper for this? This isn’t Gawker, FYI.
Yep. I tried a bunch and it's the best for Windows. Highly customizable and indispensable.
Steve Jobs was sent into exile until he proved himself. Musk needs the same treatment.
There's a lot of writing here, but the philosophical method is more or less one of dismissing things that FEEL absurd to the writer. If you allow yourself to do that, you might as well write a much shorter piece.

The cosmos may be designed in such a way that our entire universe is dedicated to the production of a certain kind of moral experience which makes us delicious to beings in an enclosing master universe. We may be souls in a pickle jar on a cosmic supermarket shelf.

I think it's far more likely that no one set this system up and we are merely living out the consequences of physical laws, but I can't rule out that a God of some kind set it all up for some reason that is Rational Unto Himself.
This is fantastic! After reading the story of stuff it’s so clear the earth needs to use compostable materials in as many things as possible.

Big fan of Ibex and Arms of Andes. Hoping to try out Iron Roots and Appalachian Gear Company soon.

Would love to learn if there’s any help you need with the project
Wait, do people not keep track of their own usage to compare it to their AWS bill? I just use free tiers for personal projects, but I guess I assumed that there would be some log reviews at some point if you were using it for running an actual business.

Anyway, I guess that means my answer is "yes".

>If you think the government’s tool is overcharging, you are welcome to file your own taxes and deal with the possibility of getting audited.

"Pay what we say you owe or we'll nuke your finances with an audit". Yes this is exactly my problem.
(This is not an argument for or against.) I was curious, so I checked. The death penalty is legal at the federal level and only 27 states. 23 states have abolished the death penalty. And many of the states where it is legal have effectively stopped executing people, so the majority of states do not execute people. It isn't much of a surprise which states still do, and there's only 11 states that do.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_Un...
Maybe your empathy towards caterpillars says more about you than it does the caterpillars. It’s difficult for me to imagine being a caterpillar let alone a paralyzed caterpillar being devoured from within.

Why is there any more or less moral weight to the wasps lifecycle than any other predator along the food chain?
Elon denied various non-weed drugs before. That itself is a problem.

again, ANYONE else doesn’t pass security clearances over this.
I wonder why wasn’t you flagged for this aggressive position? How dare you to respect others? Get the downvotes. That shows the hn very well, very well indeed.
The main point is that a new main line would revolutionize local and regional transport as well. So even if you don't build a high speed one, you get a lot of benefit. But once you are building new lines, might as well make it a high-speed line.

And we also should consider longer distances. Sure if you are going from Bern to Zürich 5-10min difference isn't gone be that big of a deal (well arguably if you have millions of people doing it, it does start to matter at least a little).

But even if you look at Genf-Zürich, a new main line could cut that time by 40%-50%, from almost 3h to more like 1.5h.

But what if you want to go from Southern France to Stuttgart or Münich. From Marseille to Zürich.

We have major population density in a straight line from Genf to St.Gallen. Having a modern high speed rail connection across that population just makes sense.
Elon does cocaine.
I don't think so. I know everybody loves to say that IRC is better than [insert commercial chat application] but in this particular use case discord is superior to irc imo because of the voice/video chat features and greater convenience.
Yes - especially for my state returns here in Oregon. I am due a refund. I received a letter stating that they made an adjustment. They still haven't sent the refund.
I think I agree with your first point about actively seeking diversity being worthless in the abstract.

In a world of biased people, though, it can be a way to act against unfair bias. Biased people tend to lose their bias when they become friends with people from the groups they are biased against.

Actively _avoiding_ diversity, though, which it seems you find to be morally neutral, I find to be morally negative.

The shape (or in the real world, e.g. race) of an individual is a superficial attribute. It is extremely unfair to judge someone by it.
For some reason you and others seem to think every action or decision takes the same amount of effort and willpower. That's the only contradiction I see in these comments which is causing all these conflicting opinions.
No? The problem of evil is applicable to any religion that claims that an omnipotent and omniscient creator of the world exists, which many strands of Hinduism do.

The doctrine of karma is a good attempt but it still doesn't solve it. In fact, I think it was a scholar from Jainism, a religion that does believe in Karma, who raised this a version of this the problem of evil against theistic schools of Indian philosophy in mediaeval times, independently from the Greek philosopher who first raised it.
She incompetent and generally doesn’t know what she’s talking about.
As an NPM user since NPM existed, all I can do is shake my head and laugh at this point.
> Sabine is, uh, somewhat controversial.

At the same time people never really seem to be able to give a reasonable explanation as to why, beyond that they disagree with some of her takes.
Damn I just yesterday was pulling my hair out to get boost::beast to run (how unergonomic can an api be?!). Now I‘m considering to switch but what I really need is long term stability. I‘d rather like to not ever touch this code again, but it should compile over the next 5-10 years. I‘m not sure which one would be preferable in that regard
It is a minefield you’re right. I just implemented my own version of it with trial and error.
You can't make that division. Controversialness is not binary. Almost every researcher has a few controversial ideas, that's just natural when trying to push the envelope. Unfortunately, some like to be controversial for the sake of being controversial, and some are so far out there that it would be a waste of time to listen to them.
The modern equivalent of ‘the birth of Christ is closer in time to the modern day than to the construction of the Great Pyramid of Giza.’
> Surely they just realize that this will be held against the US for a long time?

Who can? There are plenty of things people around the world hold against the US. It's not like anyone can actually do something about it and that's all that really matters.
"Criminally," is the word you are looking for.
XMeters used to be very good, but does not work on Windows 11.

Task Manager is very limited, unfortunately. You only get CPU usage in the notification area.
The cutting edge of progress is going to be found in controversy, but the "boring" established fact is often correct.

Non controversial people are worth listening to as well.
Despite what you may think, C is still the most portable language. I can think of several embedded platforms where Rust or C++ is not even an option.
That's a matter of active speculation on the Portland subreddit, as you might imagine. As far as I know, no land owner has come forward with the missing window.

There's a lot of green space in and around Portland. There's good odds it may never be found, especially if it lands in some remote corner of Forest Park.
Why Is ByteDance Moving into Biology, Chemistry and Drug Discovery?
To simplify what is an absurdly complicated topic, the US Tax Code gives you a lot of "breaks" for certain things. For a lot of those things, the government won't know they happened unless you tell them (and you prove it). In most cases (i.e. for regular salaried or hourly employees) your taxes are automatically deducted, and then at the beginning of the new year you basically give the government a list of things that happened that could/would/should reduce your taxable income, which results in you getting money back from the government (sometimes).
Most people have bad takes outside of their field of expertise. I haven't seen her video on capitalism, but honestly no matter how horrible it is, i doubt it would change my view on her videos on physics.
Then how do you explain the monkey behaviour you have given me?
What's this community called?
> since sorting is already in the standard library

Right. For example, to sort a list of numbers:

[5, 14, 1, 2].sort()

Works great! No, wait, that's obviously wrong. Uh,

[5, 14, 1, 2].sort((a, b) => a - b)
I think I actually disagree with Gandhi here. Lol. There are a lot of people that do the work. The numbers of those who take the credit are much less. However, there is usually a power imbalance that yields to their ability to do so. So it's not about numbers. It's about power.
The position is: quantum gravity might not be that big of a mysterious problem as most physicist make it out to be so they would rather ignore that prediction by Wetterich.

That's it, that's the entire position. I don't know, that's not a lot of substance to work with. I don't think it's a particular controversial stance. It does fit very well into her "I'm not like the other physicists" shtick, though.
But you're not any smarter now; you just know a fancy word that basically refers to rule-based morality.

The kid used philosophical jargon to accuse Kant of favoring a rigid rule-based moral behavior, without the flexiblity of allowing rules to be bent or flouted when they wouldn't lead to a good outcome.

Any parrot can learn to articulate an idea like this using "deontological" and "consequentialism".

It just comes across as pretentious; no wonder teachers found that irritating.
Yup. That’s exactly what you did.
Don‘t you need a http server to bring about any websocket connection through the upgrade mechanism? Otherwise it would only be a websocket client library
Obviously they must have done something very bad in their previous life as an animal with free will! Maybe they tortured someone as a human.

I don't believe this explanation, but reincarnation usually comes along with karma in a package.
Yeah, not to be totally insensitive, but 45,000 Americans died on our roads last year and basically no one has even a single fuck to give about it. For some reason all we ever complain about is the only safe transportation system we have.
What Happens When You Roleplay with ChatGPT
>Instead, the article (ironically) appears to be written from the biased standpoint that it "ought to be" so

This attitude is pervasive in the US due to the history of violence, enslavement and segregation against other races. The Chinese, African American and Japanese have all been victims of such crimes in the US.

Internationally the biggest culprit that comes to mind is the systematic slaughter and extermination of the Jewish people aka the holocaust.

Thus what you see in modern society is an over correction. In attempt to get away from one extreme we've headed towards our objective and over shot it like a control system overshooting equilibrium. Assuming "diversity" as a default without scientific basis isn't even the extreme I'm talking about here, we're shooting way past that.

But you see what your post implies right? Yes it's scientifically valid to ask whether diversity is good or bad. Yes it's very possible to find out via science that diversity is bad. But the consequences of such knowledge, means a valid utilization of segregation enforced on the basis of science.

Right? Imagine kicking all black people out of a white neighborhood based off of valid and real science about how diversity is bad. Questioning diversity is scientifically valid and a negative conclusion against diversity is a realistic possible truth we may not want to face. Anyway, I digress... I mentioned we overshot the whole diversity question right?

We can all probably agree that it's not good to segregate based off of race. But should we segregate people who identify as a wolves or penguins? https://www.lgbtqia.wiki/wiki/Therian_system

Where is the line drawn? Allowing a transgender female to compete in female sports? Or allowing someone who identifies as a turtle to fly a passenger airplane? When does "diversity" cross the line into scientific absurdity? When should it be classified as insane? That's the big question here and modern society is at a point where all of this is blurry and not obvious yet.

Literally I posted a link to a website that lists "therian" as a formal scientific concept. We've definitely overshot here.
Introducing Mamba Swarm

The first ever implementation of a swarm of Mambas for real-world language modeling. There are various custom fusion methods such as weighted average, the absmax, softmax, and more.

https://github.com/kyegomez/swarms-pytorch

LLMs will never be the same...
But you are doing the same thing. Switzerland has a high standard of 3min is late. What actually important if you make your connections. In Switerland you make your connection like 98ish% of the time.

This article picks out some of the worst lines over a very short time period. You can do that in most networks. Some German ICE lines have 23% on time.

I ride some of those city to city pairs and those numbers don't line up with my experiance over the last couple years.