skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I guess primary sources are less cool if you aren’t going to read them and go in with a made-up mind. I was prepared to see a hysterical and inappropriate letter that at the very least didn’t fit the spirit of discussion of improving work conditions, even if it did fit the strict definition. Looks like it’s well within the spirit, though.

Oh well, it’s there for all to read. No need to rely on me or “criminal crew running the government” here. And thank god for that. We might be nuts with wildly bad information.
Don't need maven

> No external dependencies may be used
> > Honestly, the story makes it clear that range is an issue, not that range is doable in an EV.

> How is it an issue? They had a great trip and found that the animal viewing was especially enjoyable in an EV, and the experience was significantly different from driving an ICE.

That's not relevant to "range is an issue".

> If it doesn't work in OPs particular scenario, that's fine, but I don't know why you're making generalised statements about a specific trip.

Because it is being presented as newsworthy when it really isn't - 100km/day is not what people refer to when they say "range anxiety". A long trip in which 50% of the trip duration is spent waiting for charge is also not newsworthy.
Cars are daily-use items for most people, so not in the frame of discussion. Unless you only drive your car like once a year or something, in which case yeah you might be better off renting.
What is the downside of memory mapping in this scenario? Shouldn't the page table properly handle the case of doing a single sequential read over a range of pages? Accessing the contents of a file doesn't seem like something caching would matter for. Do you mean that reading of sequential pages will keep adding to the cache compared to reading from a single page? That seems like a similar thing as before where they will be the first things gone from the cache anyways.
He must have clicked on a video of Swift 5.9 ..those enums! https://youtu.be/pD2XZHnDKvo

I probably wouldn't have learned algorithms and data structures as[S] well without Pascal but I never learned it right until C eventually cameawrong.

PS: We still have Dr. Donald Knuth with us :)
Why?

The author does explicitly want all the files to be cached in memory for the later runs: https://x.com/gunnarmorling/status/1742181941409882151?s=20
According to every source on the Internet, circumnavigating Iceland appears to be ~1300 kilometers. It would require impressive detours to make that 2000 kilometers.

Like I said, it is smaller than almost all US States. Iceland isn’t that large.
I assume parent probably meant that the worse you can do in rust (e.g use of unsafe... etc) would just put you back at C level of memory safety.
Gradle is faster than what? Than maven? Maybe. But not than Go or Cargo.
Stop Asking If the Universe Is a Computer Simulation
Location: Oakland, CA, USA

Remote: OK, Hybrid preferred

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Python, Go

Resume: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GDTvxlePQFiB9VV68bqvEhn_...

Email: ja.kopczynski@gmail.com
It fits on a dusty ten year old USB stick
Did it actually remove the ridiculous system that banned the user?
This was one of my favorite StackOverflow debugging experiences: https://stackoverflow.com/a/12575044/1204143. A user posted that their code, `int main() { return 0; }`, was crashing with SIGFPE. I traced it to the fact that they had compiled the code with a fairly new GCC, but ran it on a machine with a very old libc - their old libc didn't understand `DT_GNU_HASH` and was trying to look symbols up in an empty `DT_HASH` (computing the bucket indices mod 0 - hence SIGFPE).

It's possible to debug these! If it's a segfault (as opposed to the kernel just refusing to load your file), it's usually because ld.so (the dynamic linker) has crashed, and you can debug ld.so explicitly (gdb ld-linux.so.2 ; run ./yourprog). With symbols it's usually feasible to identify the code in the dynamic linker that has crashed.
Most people don't ride off the road, yet they get themselves rugged downhill bicycles with crazy big wheels in the city. Other people buy SUVs, in the city, where a smaller vehicle might have a ton of advantages.

This is all in a certain sense irrational behaviour, but in another sense it is more about the feeling. People like to buy things that they can imagine them helping in all life situations.

A car is not a small investment for many and if you have the choice between one that perfectly serves 95% of your trips and might suck at the rest and another that serves 100%, but the 95% are slightly worse/inefficient/expensive, that is a choice one can make. In certain circumstances it could even be the rational choice. E.g. if the charging infrastructure where you live isn't there.
I missed the "5 times in a row." If you do that, yeah, keeping the whole thing in memory is far better.
They are but you’re still working together to make the same thing so the process is intertwined. This is also why you have several specializations for example gameplay engineer or technical designer on larger teams that bridge the gap.
To be fair, I don’t think they’d have gotten a single one for $5k or less, and only got that price by buying the pair, and I think the new model years were about to arrive or just had. But they were new cars!
”This is not the place for modesty. I was very good at concurrency.” Agreed!
Fair enough, but then you aren’t really testing the range of an EV.
That was the BMW i3 with range extender. But also it seems discontinued in 2022.
Although the range extender was a generator for the electrics, so maybe didn’t meet your definition of ICE entirely.
I wanted to buy one but my wife hated the look of it. It seems like car companies used to give their electric cars to design interns and say “draw something that looks like it’s electric”.
The problem is you’re arguing today and I’m arguing the next ten years. The Supercharger network has grown wildly since I bought my S in 2018 (and have driven it cross country over the last six years, mostly on Superchargers), and as long as it keeps up with EV uptake, that is good enough. It does not need to be perfect, and someone will always find a complaint. Sell to people who will buy, ignore people who will find excuses not to.

As long as Tesla can sell every vehicle they build and continue to drag legacy automakers to an EV future, individual opinions of the network are of low value. It was of enough value for major automakers to know they couldn’t succeed without it.
>It is critical that the shareholders, the board, and the CEO make this determination about messages and mission, and values

They did by creating the rules of conduct that all employees must abide by. "Rules for the but not for me" is bad corporate leadership.

>not a mutiny by a subset of employees with an agenda (the same agenda as all the people here who think Musk is the devil) and who make unsupportable claims that they magically know better than managment what the PR should look like.

Asking your company to hold another employee accountable to the rule of conduct we all agreed to abide by is not mutiny.

>I'm not going to read the rest of this stupid letter, it's a smarmy politcal sneer motivated by the ideological imperatives of a tiny minority of shareholders, who support a Whitehouse that has politicized the Justice Department more than has been seen in a long long time. Not even LBJ behaved like the criminal crew running the govt, this is 19th century bare knuckled politics.

It's is clear you just have a political bent here rather than a calm and considered idea.
He was comparing like for like. I don't think anyone will deny that EVs are more expensive
Yeah, I've realized that culture just isn't translating. I think dinner party was the wrong word to use because it has primed the conversation where people are imaging the only use for a dinner room is hosting an evening ball.

I know a group, where 8 people + a dungeon master meet weekly/bi-weekly to play DnD. It's a little on the larger side but this would be "dinner" party size. Of course they bring food and drinks as well. It would be a little ridiculous (and expensive) for them to rent a grand ballroom every weekend.

Similarly there are plenty of people I know who look forward to college football and hold similarly sized game days with themselves and significant others. Again nothing special, just 6-12 people ultimately watching tv. Food is brought, and drinks are had, but they aren't having a "rager". Renting a park every weekend to watch college football every weekend would be expensive.

The fact that you would think to rent a park for these kind of things just leads me to believe we are talking past each other. We are missing significant cultural context on the utilities of these rooms. If you don't watch sports or don't play DnD I can see how the idea of needing a dining room is superfluous.

And most people would't throw away their friend groups in order to invest $10k on the S&P. At that point, why even have the money?
That's an interesting approach. So the variant name itself doesn't bear the type information but should be uniquely resolved in the type check time, right? It will be pretty much optimal unless you are doing metaprogramming stuffs.
It’s the same problem it’s always been from my point of view.

There’s nowhere to charge. No charger at my apartment, none at my office and according to internet charger maps it’s a 45 minute round trip to go get a charge and then I have to both save some of the range to get there and waste some getting back.

Doesn’t appear that anything will change on the next few years to gain a charger at my apartment or work either.

Also EVs all appear way more expensive than the used ICE cars that I would buy.

I don’t have the faintest desire for a luxurious car. I just want a super simple basic cheap car to get from point a to b.
I am specifically responding to the use of "most people". Certainly some people have parties 1-4 times per month. But most people? As in, more than 50% of people? Not where I am from in USA, but maybe there are cultures where this happens.

Notably I am not imagining large parties (the 300 people you mention). I just haven't had more than 1 person over to my place at a time in over a year.

> Would you rent a space to host 8 people every week just to play DnD?

No but in such a situation only 1/8th of the people involved need to have a living room.
like for what like? give an example.
Nitpick: as a non-SI unit recognized for use in astronomy[0] "jansky" is always lowercase, not capitalized.

This is true for all SI units. Newton, watt, and joule are all lowercase, unless they appear at the beginning of a sentence or when you're referring to the original scientists.

People often get confused because the abbreviations for those units are capitalized.

[0] https://www.iau.org/publications/proceedings_rules/units/
With what should we replace it? None of the other formats have an similar featureset that is commonly used in PDF.
How about a million k.
To store dollars with a precision of 1 cent, you store into your integers cents instead of dollars. No need to mess with anything more complicated.
Well first of all, it's not "I wish I had less space" but rather "I wish I had the goods and experiences I had to forego in order to obtain and hold onto this extra space".

But anyways you're missing the point. For instance my house had a 'dining room' when I bought it, but I made it into something that I use every day (music studio/band practice room).

The conventional part of me would have just kept it a dining room, and used it maybe once or twice.
Interesting! Among the top, I see some Japanese accounts as well as Elon Musk himself.

I wonder if this website's developer paid the hefty fees to use the Twitter API.
In the last 15 to 20 years asynchronous programming --- as a form of cooperative multi-tasking [1] --- did gain lot's of popularity. That was mainly because of non-scalable threads implementations in most language runtimes, e.g. the JVM. At the same time the JS ecosystem needed to have some support for concurrency. Since threads weren't even an option the community settled first on callback-hell and then on async/await. The former reason to asynchronous programming alleged win is currently being reversed. The JVM has introduced light weight threads that have the low runtime cost of asynchronous programming and all the niceties of thread-based concurrency.

[1]: Asynchronous programming is not the only form of cooperative programming. Usually cooperative multi-tasking systems have a special system call yield() which gives up the processor in addition to io induced context-switches.
Makepad, very ambitious (watch the vid): https://github.com/makepad/makepad
100%. If you want behaviour changed with proper penalties, allow private enforcement of rights.
I agree with your gist, but I self-identify as an authoritarian, and I don't think you can support your point without that admission.

Your erroneous rationale is the paragraph about "the ask". The boss said "no assholes" (among other things) and then violated those rules (in the employees' eyes, and yours, and mine). The employees delicately asked the sub-boss to choose insubordination, and the request was denied, with additional consequences. Nobody was confused about who the boss was, or what actual rules were in place.

Your authoritarian rationale -- which I agree with -- is in your final paragraph: he ought to hold himself to a higher standard if he wants to be so rich and influential. I'd push a button that would make that the rules of the world. But that's an authoritarian POV.
AI Toptier: Top-tier Collections of AI Powered Apps.submit your AI apps for free
Just finished building AITOPTIER in public, an AI apps directory website! Submit your AI Apps at https://aitoptier.com for free. I'm open to any feedback and questions you may have!
Ours is being used as an office right now, and has been like that since 2020. Still has a dining table, but it's pushed up against a window and home to indoor plants right now, and we've gotten rid of the chairs since then (they were old and beaten up anyway).

Also I don't think it always makes sense to get a smaller house. We got a smaller house and I kind of regret it now, since housing prices and mortgage rates have shot up so much it's now so much harder to upgrade (and the house we got was intended to be a starter home), and also we'd get so much more if we sold a larger house today than our house now.

For example, let's assume prices went up about 50% on average in the past five years for the sake of easy math (not too far from how much my home actually did go up after a reappraisal last year). Buy a house at $300k and it goes up 50% means you can sell it for $450k and make $150k out of it. But buy a $500k home and it goes up 50%, means you can sell it at $750k and made $250k out of it. Granted you're making higher payments that whole time as well but not as much as it went up.

That math doesn't make as much sense now, with prices starting to dip a bit and high mortgage rates muting demand somewhat, however.
All the comments here seem to be interpreting "sunsetting the platform" to mean existing users will have no access to airplane features. Couldn't it just mean "airplane will be part of the Airtable platform moving forward"?
> a browser extension.

Already exists, but feel free to upgrade or make your own:

https://github.com/reveddit/real-time-extension
Couldn't find your contact info. Email me?
While I believe learning ComfyUI is challenging, but it becomes much simpler when you understand the underlying workings. In the long run, I am more optimistic about ComfyUI. It's worth investing.
Spamassassin is doing it's job here, and doing a good job!

Most spammers and marketing/sales sleezoids never think they are doing anything wrong. They are totally empathy incapable. Or they know they are scum and don't care. Either way.

OP talks about adding "invisible text" and other such common spammer tactics to get around some of the rules. Zero self-awareness.

At no point did this person ever think "did I do something wrong?". No, it's that shitty Spamassassin!
Sorry this is getting ridiculous, go and read the letter, it's reasonably worded and specifically calls out the problems that you cause by making a policy for the employees ("don't be an a-hole") but then don't call out employees above some level for violating these rules.

Moreover, a little research would have revealed to you that Shot well publicly stated that the employees were fired for their letter. There is no burden of proof here.
If you know something will happen it is not an edge case, at least how the word is commonly used. Doesn't matter how often.

System A delivering its event after system B may be an edge case.

Daylight saving time computations are not handling an edge case but a normal case that happens twice a year.
50% of telco Orange Spain's traffic got hijacked – a weak password
> double parsing

In case you haven't noticed yet, the input format guarantees exactly one fractional digit, so you can read a single signed integer followed by `.` and one digit instead.
The average new car transaction in the US is $48k.

I do suspect we'll start to see lower priced EVs in the used market in coming years however.
I think the K would likely be both simpler and harder than your first example by reading very straightforwardly in a single direction but with operators reading like line noise. In your case, my Numpy is rusty, but I think this is the Ruby equivalent of what you were doing?

textb = 'What hath the Flying Spaghetti Monster wrought?'

p textb.bytes.product((0...8).to_a).map{_1>>_2}.map{_1 & 1}

Or with some abominable monkey patching:

class Array
def outer(r) = product(r.to_a)
def right_shift = map{_1>>_2}
end

p textb.bytes.outer(0...8).right_shift.map{_1 & 1}

I think this latter is likely to be a closer match to what you'd expect in an array language in terms of being able to read in a single direction and having a richer set of operations. We could take it one step further and break the built in Array#&:

class Array
def &(r) = map{_1 & r}
end

p textb.bytes.outer(0...8).right_shift & 1

Which is to say that I don't think the operator-style line-noise nature of K is what gives it its power. Rather that it has a standard library that is fashioned around this specific set of array operations. With Ruby at least, I think you can bend it towards the same Array nature-ish. E.g. a step up from the above that at least contains the operator overloading and instead coerces into a custom class:

textb = 'What hath the Flying Spaghetti Monster wrought?'

class Object
def k = KArray[*self.to_a]
end

class String
def k = bytes.k
end

class KArray < Array
def outer(r) = product(r.to_a).k
def right_shift = map{_1>>_2}.k
def &(r) = map{_1 & r}.k
end

p textb.k.outer(0...8).right_shift & 1

With some care, I think you could probably replicate a fair amount of K's "verbs" and "adverbs" (I so hate their naming) in a way that'd still be very concise but not line-noise concise.
> If the government and automakers are serious about making transportation more sustainable, they should be incentivizing smaller vehicles, hybrid cars, and public transportation like trains and buses.

You can't really expect automakers to like trains and buses. This leaves us with government.

Smaller cars, hybrid are OK. Trains and buses work well hub to hub and inside large cities. They are not OK in the countryside where population is sparse. People know that and it results in people of large cities doing without cars and people in small cities owning at least one per family.

I didn't own a car 2012 to 2020 when I was living in a large city. I did 400 euro of gas per year for two years in a row and ditched my car when I had to pay a larger sum for a repair. Plenty of taxis fit in a 400 euro and we started to have fleets of rental cars that you can pick at the side of the road without reservation and notice. That doesn't work with low population densities.

I don't live in a large city anymore. Actually I live in a very small town and life here is unthinkable and unfeasible without a car.

So, ditching driving could work for most of the urban population but not for everybody in general.
Despite official statements about MD5, the leading e-discovery software provider uses sha256: https://help.relativity.com/9.0/Content/Relativity/Processin....

And it is unclear if that is in any way unusual.
In ten years, I might not disagree. Today, there are many parts of the US where many people would be idiots to buy an EV. Many people would be fine with EVs today, but that probably isn’t the case for a large percentage of Americans.
Emmanuel Katto's ideas have sparked a vital debate within Africa on how to capitalize on its vast mineral resources strategically. By advocating for careful consideration and optimized utilization of these riches, he offers a path to secure lasting economic prosperity for the continent. His commitment to sustainable practices and inclusive development has positioned him as a catalyst for change, shining a spotlight on the immense potential of Africa's mineral sector.
This is good example of vendor lock-in problem on low-code tools.
5-Year Ownership Costs

Corolla - $32,475

Model 3 - $49,089

https://www.edmunds.com/car-comparisons/?veh1=401921005&veh2...
Yup. What can cause confusion is that Backblaze is offering multiple storage products. One is a cloud storage service similar to S3, and one is a computer backup service and accompanying client software.

• If you use the backup service, which is called Computer Backup, Backblaze supplies the client backup software. Computer Backup is $9/month/computer (with discounts if you pay in advance which can lower it to $5.25/month/computer if you pay 3 years in advance) and has file sharing and mobile apps.

It's meant to be an all-in-one easy to use backup service that you don't have to think much about.

• If you are using the S3-like service, which is called B2, Backblaze just provides storage and an API. If you want to use it for backup you have to supply the backup software, such as Restic. It is priced based on storage rather than number of computer, costing $6/TB/month.

There are no data transfer costs for uploads. Downloads are $0.01/GB but each month you get free up to 3x the total amount you have stored. You'd have to be having a really bad month if you had to restore your entire backup more than 3 times!

There are also charges for using some API calls. It looks like upload and delete calls are free, download calls are 2500 free per day then $0.0004 per 10000, and calls that manipulate data on the server like copying are 2500 free per day then $0.0004 per 1000 calls. That doesn't seem too bad. Downloading a million files in one day would be about $0.40.
I’d still buy considering they’re 1/3 the price of comparable western ones
To be fair, 20k for any sizable dining room seems also rather cheap.. I would have assumed with current building cost to be more in the 40 to 50k area

At least in areas where space matters...
People by home alarm system even if they've never been robbed.
>To store dollars with a precision of 1 cent, you store into your integers cents instead of dollars. No need to mess with anything more complicated.

As someone who does it, financial math is often done at a precision of more than 1 cent. This is the reason that most (high-latency) financial libraries use strings underneath.

This al doesn't address the high order floating point arithmetic of geo-spacial, which was the Patriot issue.
Just use JNA to allocate an RWX buffer with mmap, unpack a bit of clever code into the buffer, and forge a native function pointer to call it :)
Given that no Cloudflare employees chimed in when we talked about this last on Discord, seems they’re confused too.

I should probably use our enterprise support for once to get a clarifying answer..

Personally / my company is sticking with what the terms say, and not a blog post (which may not have been reviewed as heavily). Makes sense, since we agreed to the terms, not every blog post.