skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My EV takes 0 minutes to fill up. Plug in at night, unplug a pre-heated / defrosted fully-charged car in the morning. All for 1/5th of the price of my old diesel per mile. Haven’t used a public charger for months.
Synthetically-Generated Genomically Targeted Plagues Will Be the Future of War
> ...theories like the Big Bang are not incompatible with a creator.

First there was energy-mass, in one place. The laws of thermodynamics do not allow such an energy-mass.

The energy-mass is at equilibrium. Then the energy-mass is not at equilibrium, and it explodes outward, creating the mass-mass and energy-energy that we know.

Now there are laws, such as the laws of thermodynamics, that will not allow such an energy-mass to exist.

Where did the laws come from? An external source certainly. We know this because the energy-mass was at rest, not exploding; no laws.

Now there are laws suddenly. Laws don't make themselves. It takes external force to create a law. What was that external law-creating force?

I believe it was God with a big G. I have no proof except the very laws of the universe that were put into motion when the energy-mass exploded.
Having lived in Japan, I agree with you.

But there was that spate of recent sushi shop licking incidents. Not the same type of destruction, but related, I would assert.
The relative priorities of && vs ||, or & vs |, match the traditional precedence in logical expressions: "and" binds more tightly than "or", just as * binds more tightly than + ("and" is equivalent to * for one-bit values, and "or" is addition modulo 2). So I think that they got this correct.

However, the precedence of & vs &&, or & vs ||, etc is a source of problems.
Is there an intuition for this correspondence otherwise I don't think it's very helpful
Also if you forget which is multiplication and which is addition, remember false is 0 and true is 1, then work it out from there: a * b is only nonzero if both of them are nonzero, so it's AND.
You should really watch a bunch of the old Jobs videos.

A prime example is price. Jobs’ was asked why they didn’t make a competing MacBook at the $600 Windows laptop price point (I think this was the mid 2000s?). He said that it might have sold really well but that they would have to severely degrade the user experience to hit that price point, and he refused to do that because he wanted to make great devices.

Back in those days you could plug any non-exotic device into a Mac, and it would mostly just work instantly, which was paradise compared to XP and 7’s driver and .dll hell. These days, I’d expect Apple to do stuff like patch the AirPods Max firmware to break the Android apps that enable all the cool non-basic features.
Am I alone in thinking this is cool but not inherently useful? The only use case where this might be useful is in video calls to make ‘eye contact’ more realistic but I’m sure there are software fixes (altering pupils)

In most cases such as the windscreen you can just have a camera on the frame. Why does it need to utilise the glass itself?
Thank you. Alas, the Finder may have a route to victory:

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/deep-space/a43519907/...
Not only does English get you by in most big cities, a fair amount of European citizens are multilingual and often it’s the neighbouring countries that people speak the language of.
I think that is why payment processing fees and platform fees need to be separated out.
yeah but the best laptop to do this from might also be a used M1 Macbook Air...
The result looks nice but why not use existing tools like plantuml for common diagrams?

It is already supported by some Markdown to HTML converters.
People who identify as fictional characters are increasingly more common
a * b * c is only nonzero if all of a, b, c are nonzero. That's AND, and should be pretty intuitive.

a + b + c is nonzero if any of them are nonzero. (Remember each value is either 0 or 1.) So that's the intuition for OR.
...in orbit. Imagine what a device could do you can just take a wrench to if it breaks. and how much cheaper you could build that.
That's generally where methane comes from today, but in time it may come from captured CO₂, e.g. see https://terraformindustries.com/ (disclaimer: I am a minor investor).
Then: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23552760
Remember that unless there's a market for those shares, they are effectively worthless. Check places like equityzen to see.
>Just how many seconds did it take?

We don't have the entire thing on continuous video, but from various passenger videos and timestamps we know it was under one minute.

>Clearly this was more difficult than the certification test scenario.

Of course! "The plane was on fire and full of toxic smoke" would honestly be a bigger issue than the not-all-that-severely tilted floor in my opinion, but either way I think anyone would agree that this is more difficult than the certification test. Honestly, I think the certification should be much stricter, given how fast planes can burn. That is a different discussion.

>Why do you think people don't fully appreciate that?

Because there are several comments here saying you should stay put and saying outrageous things such as that you should stay inside as you could be hurt while using the slide, which is ridiculous to me while discussing an airliner that burned to the ground shortly after evacuation.

>And most certainly the placards do not tell you to ignore the cabin crew, as you believe.

I never said this. I did however imply that you should ignore cabin crew if they delay evacuation of a burning plane for several minutes, which I will stand behind. To quote another comment of mine - Had you followed crewmember instructions you would have likely died with the majority of the passengers in the Sewol disaster, for example, or the majority of the children in the Okawa disaster. I have never needed to disobey a steward's order, but if it is between my life and disobeying a steward I will choose my life every time.

>According to TASS, citing a law enforcement source

You're citing a Russian propaganda outlet citing Russian law enforcement, but thankfully we have video to disprove this, of passengers that retrieved bags stored in the overhead compartments which obviously delayed the evacuation. There were also passengers that did escape the rear, even one seated only three rows from the tail!

>In any case, even if true, your point is only relevant if the crew had delayed calling for evacuation

I never said that the cabin crew were an issue in the evacuation of SU1492 - I used it as an example of what can happen when evacuation is delayed for any reason.

It seems like you're going somewhat crudely through my comments word by word and finding anything you can take issue at. That I "failed to note" this, or "failed to point out" that. I'm not sure that makes interesting discussion; I think the broader, more interesting discussion here is whether to sit and listen to crew for several minutes in a burning aircraft or act to escape. Had the cards fallen slightly differently, this plane would have been entirely incinerated within those 18 minutes. When seconds matter, in the case of the Sewol or the Okawa disaster or SU1492, a quick and decisive evacuation is nearly always the right course of action. In fact, we have other very similar examples of a failure to evacuate by crew that caused hundreds of fatalities - Saudia 163, for example. I am not sure if those exist for the opposite point, but I would be curious to hear of them. I have found the occasional injury but not even one death.
We could, but we learned from those attempts that came before Go that it is a bad idea. There is good reason why the languages newer than Go, including Rust, also keep a clear division between errors and exceptions.

We already lived through the suffering. The new age of recognizing that exceptions and errors are in no way the same thing and should not be treated as such is a breath of fresh air.
There's a niche language called Sail that has & and | act as both bitwise and boolean operators. It actually works really well and isn't confusing at all after the initial "this is different". There's no real downside because it is a modern strictly typed language unlike C.

On the other hand I don't know if there's a real upside either. It's not very difficult to use && and || and it serves as extra documentation, and everyone is used to it by now.
You will be indeed very optimistic to assume that generic „Try again“ is clear to everyone. In some cases the effects of it are unclear even to power users and they won’t click it. Let’s say I have got timeout page after clicking the final button in the checkout process: how do I know that it won’t place the order twice if I submit again? How do I know that it will submit it again correctly? After all, those timeouts happen often due to server-side delays.

Today most people do not encounter those pages, because they interact with SPAs and more likely to encounter different error behavior. Good internet connection won’t prevent anything. Imagine a child accidentally unplugging the wifi router and grandma seeing the timeout page, because her browser doesn’t know that wifi is down. What she would do? This is the kind of situation IT support is dealing with regularly.
The designer in designer drugs indicates that someone changed a molecule here or there in a known drug to get around drug laws that specified certain substances as illegal. So we ended up with a bunch of derivatives until such time as the law could catch up
Whoa, I had a motherboard that had the same behavior. It was a long time ago, I rocked a Core2Quad at the time, but the motherboard had this issue that the audio in the headphones jacket would pickup both when the CPU was stressed (I guess due to power consumption) and additionally some mouse movement would also do small little noises - this forced me to use the keyboard more often, learned a lot of shortcuts at that time.

I remember that computer wasn't like this from the get go but started exhibiting this, after an year with it, I used it like this for at least three more years and then got a new one and the old one was converted to a media center.
If you have a Macbook, you can sync iCloud library at full resolution using Photos app and then export.
Some stuff swaps out a little at a time, but something like the massive AM5 swap has you changing 3 of the 4 most expensive parts (CPU, RAM, and Motherboard) of your machine at the same time.
I wonder the best way to get acquainted with Unix. Anytime I try to look for a good Unix distribution that would work in a VM, I end up having weird quirks (Scroll up being registered as weird keypresses, or CPU Long Mode not enabled).
Everyone hates spam, and everyone with an email account gets bombarded with it daily. But what if you could turn the tables on them, and make money doing it?
I feel like I disagree. I don't have a "duty" to do anything. If I was able to find the information and make a discovery, then others are capable of it too, and there is a lot of value in allowing people to experience that process on their own. If you ask me, I'll tell you, but I feel leaving the question open for others can often be worth doing.

I think the author makes a far finer point on one of their linked project pages, All About Berlin:

"All About Berlin is my answer to the hastily written SEO spam that pervades the web. It proves that a website can be successful without annoying the everliving crap out of its readers.

It has no ads, no paywalls, no dark patterns, no newsletter pop-up, no coercive cookie notice, no call to action, no comments, no promoted content, and no share buttons. It gives straight, honest answers for free. That’s it."

This is more useful thinking about the core issue, I feel. You don't have a duty to document, but you do have a duty to not intentionally obscure useful information in order to derive a personal benefit from that obscurity. No small irony that this is on a site that designed to take _government_ information and make it more accessible to citizens that have already paid for it.
I don't particularly have strong opinions one way or another about Musk's behavior, and certainly don't understand how you could claim he's "abusing his wealth".

I can think of many other companies and rich owners who have done much worse things, so it's surprising people seem so passionate about Elon.

Given he apologized for his Tweet that had accusations of anti-semitism, is your main evidence of him being awful is that advertiseres pulled out of the platform? From what I understand, some of them are back. Will you retract your hatred if they all return?
You are right, but using the 409a pricing would not really be honest either. (In the sense that the 409a is basically "as low as we could reasonably value this stock" in order to keep the strike prices low.)
If people were really switching back more than leaving the trends in the article would be positive instead of negative. That's not to say nobody is switching back, obviously people are, but they are also continually either not staying or grossly outnumbered by those choosing to leave for the first time.

It's a shame, I really like Firefox and having the browser decoupled from a big tech company, but it's also what the data is saying and has been for over a decade as people continue to deny it.
this is the notation used in the chapters about boolean algebra in my digital design course. I think it's pretty neat. I honestly never looked into operator precedence in any language enough to notice the relation.
About 80-90% at the moment due to project work where I'm (currently) the most experienced/knowledgable person on IaC in the company.

A few colleagues are learning very quickly so looking forward to taking a step back and focus on other things in 2024.
Ah yes, the well-known U+2318 Place of Interest Sign :D
Animals' shared ancestor with fungus is thought to be among https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choanoflagellate, which kinda look like sperm.

My guess is that they were predominantly haploid (like sperm/eggs), and just had a diploid (like most other human cells) phase for reproduction. Somewhere along the way this switched (which is thought to have happened in plants also, mosses are primarily haploid while flowering plants are primarily diploid).

...which is totally bonkers. It's like if sperm/eggs went around making all of the important decisions and only bothered to spin up a human briefly for reproductive purposes. But then the sex got a bit out of control and got a job and an apartment and now it's the sperm who look like they're just for reproduction.

Disclaimer: I took Bio 101 two semesters back, so I'm pretty much an expert.
Ivanti Patches Critical Vulnerability in Endpoint Manager
There is an export service that returns a archive
It gains efficiency compared with an airplane by spending most its trajectory outside of atmosphere with no air resistance.
People won't respect you unless you stand up for yourself. Get a little bitchy, get a little passive aggressive, push back and publicly shame some people.

Link to instructions that tell people how to search the documentation. They are wasting your time because they can't be bothered themselves. It is up to you to stop being the doormat.

It does suck that you can't expect grown arse adults to do something as simple as ctrl-f a page before bugging other people. But I have learnt the first response to any request for help should be "show me the research you have so far". Which, 90% of the time, is followed up with "let me teach you how to research this".

University (and other schooling) used to teach people how to learn, now that seems to be the responsibility of other employees.

Or, hand out fish every day and get used to the fact nothing will change.
No he wasn't. He said "America's most powerful lobby". Not its most powerful lobby "FOR a foreign country". Words mean things!
I don't know. If just following logical consequences of elementary school arithmetic leads you to discover that numbers have to be two dimensional to work ( in requiring 'i' for square roots of negatives to function, and from there 'i' being found peppered throughout the rest of our exploration of the consequences of numbers ), it might be that all things fail to be as simple as we would like.
Really starting to feel like Boeing have a massive & pervasive culture problem rather than a specific technical issues problem.

Which is terrifying...
Where are you getting the cycle count?

I have an M1 Air, I got it new and use it heavily. I see "battery health" is "normal" and "max capacity" is 90%, but I don't see a count of charge cycles.
It wasn't done privately before: many people in need without others who personally cared for them, or knew them, or were invested in their lives, just slunk off and died.

That's why the government programs exist: the "private" idea turned out to be a failure, and new ideas were needed to solve the problem.

That's why, if you want to get rid of government assistance to these people, you'd need to first come up with a workable alternative.
'Just slink off and die' isn't really a workable alternative.
Freescale owned the IP after Motorola, and they've since been acquired by NXP. For now, they are still available in the form of the derivative (simplified) ColdFire processors.

Available ColdFire ICs:

https://www.nxp.com/products/product-selector:PRODUCT-SELECT...

Differences between ColdFire and 68k:

https://microapl.com/Porting/ColdFire/cf_68k_diffs.html
Right, the parent attacks the axioms as-if they where the argument while simultaneously attacking the source as egotistical.

The axioms are of course suspect, but if you give reasonable interpretations to them then the conclusion is not far fetched as they basically necessitate some kind of creator.
I think because cars became much more reliable, we felt we didn't need these anymore.

The reintroduction of that type of service would mean you no longer thad to worry about your electric car's range when going on a road trip. The car could even charge while in the train.
It collects through the edge, and the glass can be (apparently) flat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NORPeCcIXRQ
"Discrete uniform distribution" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_uniform_distribution

Randomness test: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness_test

Google/paranoid_crypto > docs/randomness_tests.md > Tests: https://github.com/google/paranoid_crypto/blob/main/docs/ran...

"10 Tbit/s physical random bit generation with chaotic microcomb" (2023) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38044587 ; without DRBG, too
'Bitcoin's Time Has Arrived': ETF Hopefuls Eagerly Await SEC Decision
If anything, RSU compensation is worse than options because of the tax implications. With options you have the option of paying the tax before the appreciation of the equity. With RSUs, you pay at liquidity.
Well in C-derived languages && and || will short-circuit the evaluation whereas & and | will not.
Charitable reading: in the "some will rob you with a six-gun, and some with a fountain pen" senses, with a heavier emphasis on the latter, though the former is more readily punished.
>significant EW capabilities against drones.

>harder to jam and interfere with

This is where I have my doubts... We have things like HARM missiles, and I think we probably already have are or are developing "HARD" High-Speed Anti-Radiation Drones, that loiter around then attack whatever decides to start making noise in particular areas.
I'm scared of flying on any Boeing from now on. Jeez, these guys are sloppy and looking for shortcuts.
If you want to tackle the crime problem it starts at school --the educational system, parents, neighbors and strangers giving a hoot. Conformity in the form of social pressure is no longer there. Yes, we've always had small subsets who engaged in dishonorable activities, but they used to be a bit out of the public eye. Even in NYC in the 70s and 80s when there was high crime people at least knew they were doing wrong, they did not feel entitled to it. Sometime in the late 2010s it became noticeable that the taboo had been removed for a lot of people. Obviously there are many people for whom this behavior is till taboo. just not as many as before.

There is no reason we can't be like Japan --well, almost. It is harder to achieve in such a diverse population than in a less diverse population. Never the less, if we worked hard at it we could come somewhat close.
a+b+c is nonzero if any of a or b or c are nonzero.
..until you find out it's for bronycon snack packs
> The reason Windows is more popular than Linux

The reason Windows is more popular than Linux is the mountain of software and device drivers developed for it.

Which I realize is chicken-and-egg, but also...it's a really big chicken.
Totally true-- but that went from a game I could barely stand to one I really love. It is a much deeper game today then the one they first released. I am OK with them updating it for that reason.
1+1=1? My maths education was a long time ago, but I triple checked with my calculator, and I'm uncertain this is quite right.

My own mnemonic: SAXO. Shift, And, Xor, Or. (Like a real Saxo, it's fun to go a bit faster like this, but you do have to trust everybody involved, because any accident is probably going to end up badly for you.)

And now you know the bitwise precedence as well! And this ordering actually works out tidily for common operations: "x=a<<sa|b<<sb|c<<sb"; "x=p>>n&m"; "x=x&~ma|a<<sa"; and so on. You do need brackets sometimes, but fewer than you'd think, and it helps the unusual cases stand out.

(Main annoying thing: a lot of compilers, even popular ones such as clang and gcc, don't actually seem to know what the precedence rules actually are, and generate warnings asking you to clarify. Presumably the authors didn't realise that C has an ISO standard, that can be consulted to answer this question? Very surprising.)
It sure is. Not enough hours in a day or a lifetime, unfortunately.

So... I report the bullshit listings to LinkedIn or whoever; AKA yell at a cloud. Or THE cloud, in fact.
You wrote "Historically and in most modern media, wizards are strongly associated with either good or evil."

This claim isn't true insofar as historically Merlin and Morgan do both good and evil things. Now you seem to be moving the goal posts and claiming medieval isn't historical.

You can also look at Medea, who is helper/ healer to Jason and also a ruthless killer at many points in her life.

>>Alright, if you want to say that because of their lightsaber combat. There's also Yoda and the Emperor, neither of whom use "swords" in the original series, they're totally dependent on their magic.

Well, for one thing, they aren't using magic, they are using "the force." Now you can say it's just magic with a different name, but that's sort of like saying a exorcist or saint in the Christian tradition is doing magic. There's a fun bit in Good Omens about that:

--

“Occult forces?”

“You and me,” explained Crowley.

“I’m not occult,” said Aziraphale. “Angels aren’t occult. We’re ethereal.”

--

At any rate to me The Emperor seems more like a demon/ devil figure, and Yoga more like a saint, Buddha, or monk, than a wizard. Though I realize the distinction is in the eye of the beholder.
Sometimes you need an excuse for a party.
What you describe would be literally worse than nothing. The use of those concepts would make about as much sense as the use of topological concepts in a Lacanian text. A typewriting monkey in a trenchcoat.