skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The Blueprint health protocol may end up giving people with healthy bodies but an aging brain, so they will be able to live many years with dementia (because the body is otherwise healthy).

Your brain being damaged by dementia will absolutely ruin your body in a very short amount of time. In the late stages your brain can no longer perform involuntary functions and you would literally need to be fed by IV and on a respirator to stay alive.
Salim Kara stole $2M in coins with a magnet and a car antenna (2022)
> Perhaps this requires `-O0 -g` or similar to work effectively, which games devs are usually not open to.

There are also plenty of game devs expressing the idea of "never use STL, because that makes performance unusable in debug builds". Which implies that many of them are not completely against debug builds (for debug/development purpose).

The problem of variables being optimized away is mostly for local variables. This tool will most likely used on global/long lifetime objects representing overall game state and configuration, instead of temporary variables while stepping through a function. (used)Global variables and class properties are unlikely to be optimized away or mangled in away that makes them hard to inspect.

This was created to help students while learning. In those kinds of projects performance is somewhat to be less of an issue, unless you make a mistake which would ruin performance regardless of optimization level.
He’s thin and stays out of the sun to reduce damage to the skin. Makes sense that he looks different than most people because of these two things alone.

He does say he’s hungry all of the time. Not sure if I would get used to that.
I think he looks old and young at the same time. It's obvious he is not 20 years of age. But he doesn't look like 44 either. It's almost like he looks much younger than his age giving him this unnatural look.

Since very few people are measured and as fit as he is, it's not strange that we think he looks strange. But mostly I think it's lightning and makeup giving him this unnatural look.
Maybe the guy is overdoing it (obviously). On the other hand, it seems that he put a lot of research into optimal nutrition. So would consider the meals pretty solid.
When someone doesn't understand a phenomenon, they usually dismiss it as cheating or luck. It's usually the only visible factor, which is why they assume it's the dominant one in determining the behavior of a system. But it's best to factor it out and look for others.

There's a reason prices go up, there's a reason prices go down. Perhaps the reason prices went down are all gone, leaving it to float up. Scarcity is built into many cryptos and so it's only natural that prices go up even with no action taken on anyone's behalf.

There's a popular saying in investing that be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy. The data on public attention might well be inversely correlated with the price. With crypto, most of the assets are in the hands of a few and those few can move the needle more than the masses.
Do we have evidence that looking healthy and being healthy are correlated?
And I want to become a billionaire tomorrow. Except there is some actual very small probability of me becoming a billionaire, but I am nearly absolutely certain that one day I am going to die (save for some miracle-grade event). This worries me about as much as the fact that the sun will rise tomorrow.
Czech Railway network live map is at https://grapp.spravazeleznic.cz/
https://support.apple.com/en-ke/108302

iOS has a "Time Sensitive notifications" type that will popup immediately, even when user assign the app to summary view. But the type is assigned by sender alone. It is still possible to spam it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38443141 is a good start.
You want to eat protein every day to be efficient at building tissue. By eating every other day you cut ability to build stuff. Yes, the body does not have stores of protein other than your other tissue.

It can decompose for example muscle and other connective tissue (which actually is quite important to be healthy), but it does limit ability to build tissue.

Lesson from bodybuilding crowd is that you need to eat protein with every meal if you are serious about building anything. They want to build muscle but it really extends to all tissues of our body.
Seems more accurate than most Google search results
This would end up memory-bound for LLMs (and you would better get x3 4090 for this) or by compute for diffusion models (and again 4090 is like 10% slower than H100 for 1% of the price).
Definitely, a much longer list than it should be necessary

https://freight.cargo.site/w/900/q/75/i/177f6e6b12f3c2b247d1...

It would only make sense if he wants to test if he can function optimally without getting these micronutrients from "real food"
I think Bryan is an interesting dude and no matter if you think he is insane or not, it's interesting to follow and the message is a good one.

He is literally telling people to sleep more, exercise more, eat better etc etc.

How can you be against that?
> strategic voting is rational behavior

Is it? How many large-scale elections are decided by one vote?

I'm well aware that that the 2000 US Presidential election was officially decided by 537 votes (in Florida, though recounts were not allowed). Nonetheless, 537 votes is not 1 vote. If one person had changed their vote, it wouldn't have made a difference. If two people had changed their votes, it wouldn't have made a difference. If three people had changed their votes, it wouldn't have made a difference. You could try to coordinate all of your friends and family (in Florida), and it still wouldn't have made a difference.

Realistically, the chances of your vote changing the outcome of a large-scale election with millions of voters is practically nil. You have better odds of winning the lottery; as proof, people do actually win the lottery! But buying lottery tickets is not generally considered to be rational behavior.

Admittedly, there are a number of smaller, local elections that have been decided by one vote. In general, though, I would consider strategic voting to be irrational, indeed delusional.

If you want to significantly influence the outcome a large-scale election, then become ultra-wealthy and throw your money at politics. (Or you could just ignore the elections and buy off whoever wins.) The irony is that in a democracy, every vote is equal, which means none of us individually has any power as voters.

You don't need "ranked choice voting" or any other convoluted system in order to "vote your conscience", as it were. You could just do it, but we just don't.

I'm not suggesting that you ought to vote your conscience, by the way. It really doesn't matter one way or the other. But that's precisely why you could if you wanted to. From a kind of Kantian moral framework, you might vote as you would want everyone else to vote, and in that case, if you truly hate the two major political parties, then why would you vote for them, and want everyone else to vote for them? I don't believe that makes sense either strategically or morally.
C is doing fine and doesn't need interference. If people want modern C they are better off using other programming languages, and leave the rest of us with giant C codebases alone without creating pointless make-work.
> Microsoft Edge wants you to do things its way

Should be

> Microsoft wants you to do things its way

It thinks it owns your data, owns any interactions with you, like all corporations do. This is all supported legally. Once it has an online only OS, this will be obvious.

It's a choice to go along with this nonsense, isn't it?
A better way to put it is, we could fix everything, we just don't, because it is not profitable and not in the interest of the people that have the money to invest in stuff.

I do think there is definitely an element of things being harder than they seem, but it's just an element. The vast majority is the for profit nature of our system, that does not reward making things better.
Where "you" means a nematode worm?
“When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.” - This is the case with things like pandemic responses too.
It is worse on web push notification. I don't know why anyone expecting clients are happy to watch random ADs popup on their computer.
These websites will look so funny 100 years from now when everyone involved is dead.

It will look to the future exactly like emperors drinking mercury to extend their lives. I love it.
Anyone who talks about being a genius in their self promotion does not have your best interests at heart.
I'm trying to wrap my head around why build a hook into lldb instead of writing a library that would allow your students to simply spawn an imgui window with the variables exposed in exactly the same way?

This is generally a tool you would likely need to build into a game regardless for exactly the reason you mentioned, rebuilding to change gameplay variables isn't exactly a great experience.

I personally just use a simple terminal that I can open and close to adjust variables but eith hoe easy imgui is I don't see any reason to not do a gui window for that.
> and it often takes a lot of time to set up a test, in which you wake up with a better / cleaner solution. (so the test you wrote is testing the wrong implementation.)

Isn't that a smell?

There was a recent topic on testing. In my view, I should be testing the API of units of coherent logic. If I change the underlying implementation of that logic, why should my tests change?
This argument comes up reasonably regularly.

No, the majority of the world does not download and run binaries from non-reputable sources.

The distinction between reputable and non-reputable varies, but broadly easily spoofable user uploaded content falls into the non-reputable.

Most people download software from trust worthy websites like the official chrome website.

Indeed, the fact that people are continually scammed by this sort of attack is why Apple now refuses to run unsigned binaries by default.

To pretend nothing is wrong here is like pretending JavaScript supply chain attacks don’t exist because you don’t want them to exist.

…and yet. They do exist; wanting it not to be true does not make it so.

Likewise, downloading and running arbitrary binaries from a forum is naive.

You simply want nothing bad to happen.

That does not mean nothing bad will actually happen.

Even if you trust the authors of the posts, how reputable is the forum itself? Are the binary hashes posted? (No, they aren’t).

> I'm new in this forum

^ does not inspire confidence.
Recent posts on Ascon:

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

https://old.reddit.com/r/crypto/search/?q=Ascon&sort=new&res...
I think what they really meant there was

> But with pushes, we have to guess what is the upper limit of unwanted marketing the customer will tolerate
The whole tragedy of the commons was literally made up by a very reactionary dude to justify fucking people over and justify enclosure and privatisation. Historically people have actually had rather complicated and at the same time very effective ways of sustainably managing the commons. It also happens that privatisation is the thing that makes the tragedy of the commons happen.
Par for the microsoft product course. They are the 80%ers - all of their products achieve ~80% of their potential.

Some might argue that's just being prudent and shipping only the minimally marketable features but my riposte to that is the layer upon layer of shit they continue to apply whilst ignoring broken core features on many of their products.
A very good exposition of this topic can be found in the Feynman lectures

https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_22.html
I'm someone who regularly scrapes websites and uses bs4 to format the data. Admittedly it takes me some time to get what I want exactly, but the past year ChatGPT has _drastically_ sped up the creation of my scripts. Given that I am your target audience, why would I pay a pretty steep 39USD for something I can do myself in 30 minutes - and without limits? There is a high correlation between scraping websites and being tech-savvy enough to produce a (simple) script to do so. The only reason I'd consider buying your product is if I have to do this so often that it would save me the time of writing ONLY the bs4 part of my scraping script (which is often the easy part; websites are awfully incoherent and buggy), but that would only happen if I wanted to scrape vastly more than 25k "lines in a csv" (which is what I assume 1 credit gives you, but is never explained).
I haven't tried it yet, but the Zig package manager should be flexible enough to deal with binary blobs? After all it's just pulling in an external directory and runs its build.zig (which then can make available precompiled libraries to the rest of the build process).
I watched it before and the thing that I will forever remember from it was the "jubilate": https://youtu.be/Eq3bUFgEcb4?t=1346
The underlying point that the vast majority of problems are Moloch/incentive alignment problems is correct, but a lot of those examples are controversial. To take one:

> We know that automation is chipping away at low-skill jobs, which means our workforce needs to be better educated, and that providing free college to everyone would be a good idea, we just don’t.

University education is primarily a signalling mechanism. Getting a degree in English literature doesn't actually make you a better oil market analyst to an appreciable degree, it just signals the ability to do work with minimal supervision.

And if higher education is indeed a positional good then funding everyone to do it is just setting money/time on fire.
Nothing. Everything. Never. /article

In all seriousness, I recommend the app FilterBox, it allows you to set fine grained rules for notifications for each app
> The mouse and keyboard still haven't been replaced by a touch screen.

That is very much in line with what I'm saying. Where you don't have a space problem, having a keyboard and a mouse and a big screen is ideal.

But just as no one is seriously considering putting a mouse on a phone, I don't see why they'd consider a keyboard as mandatory either.
What is this guys agenda? Seems like he’s on the path to setup a cult.
Tom is definitely in this thread somewhere and I hope he's smiling. Thanks a bunch and have a nice vacation. You are appreciated.
AI is also likely to make a huge difference to coordination problems. We can imagine a future in a short while ... maybe a decade or few? ... where we as random citizens can ask an AI we trust to go through the last 30 years of parliamentary records, profile an individual politician's voting record and interpret it according to my personal worldview.

That seems like it'd be a significant change to the game. At the moment, figuring out what someone's record is is still too hard even with sites that are trying to help. I can go to http://politicsthatwork.com/ and see a politician scored 12.8% on "Humane Immigration Policy" which tells me nothing [0]. My views are complex enough that no mass-produced title is going to break things down in a way I'm satisfied with.

But AI will allow that sort of summary where I can describe what sort of features a record should have, with examples of particular bills. I can think of other similar uses too; this'll be a wild era. One person can get through a lot of text all of a sudden. Maybe even fast enough to use it while arguing politics in real time.

[0] Does the dude hate migrants? Love migrants but prefers a welfare-heavy society and wants to try and make it sustainable? Loves migrants but the opposition is playing silly games with bill names? Loves high-skilled migrants? Are the bills being voted only tangentially related to migrants, or strategically entangled with migrant issues? Politics is best understood in context.
Uh sorry, i was gonna link gen nvim I found gp to have more functions / modes to use it. Gp might be able to support local models using the openai spec, at least i saw an issue in their repo about that.
Bryan Johnson is going all in, because (1) he wants to show what's possible and (2) he can afford it. He's dedicated his entire being to the cause. You and I don't need to. What we should do instead, is learn new and interesting stuff from his journey, and apply the 80/20 rule.
> Historically people have actually had rather complicated and at the same time very effective ways of sustainably managing the commons.

Ones that scale to more than a million people?
That's true of any identifier.

I remember losing cell service after a storm, but the internet still worked. I couldn't login to gmail (~10-12 years ago when this was the only 2fa) because my phone couldn't receive text messages with the 2fa code.

Even if you lose all the keys to your house, you'll need to get new locks. If the locksmith who is going to let you into your house does everything by the book, they'll need you to prove you actually live there. I had a friend thrown in jail for a day because his ID, keys, etc. were lost in a kayaking trip, and was arrested for attempting to break into his own house.

My point is, there really isn't a good answer here. The platform equivalent to hiding keys in the bushes is printing out one-time passwords. That works pretty well, but also has its own drawbacks.
He just looks like a 50-years old guy who spends a lot of time in the gym/kitchen. His face and skin texture give away its age.

I have no idea about his health protocol, but I'm pretty sure a regular healthy life style (avoiding junk food + recommended dose of exercising) would give you the same results in term of longevity.
It is on https://protocol.bryanjohnson.com site. For example, his fitness routine: https://protocol.bryanjohnson.com/#fitness

Personally, I have taken few things from his routine and double-checked it with other sources and more importantly found much cheaper products/things locally than the ones that are advertised (even though, most of them are fine anyways such as in Skincare he uses standard Cerave stuff).

Do note that this is -one- guy trying basically everything that seems plausible. It would likely result in frequently switching up things that are not researched well.
As Principal Software Engineer (QA) in the domain of video technology at Zattoo you will support all teams related to the end to end video processing chain, ranging from ingest, encoding, packaging, encryption to content delivery and playback. Collaborate with a highly skilled and passionate team of multi-national engineers to build and operate our video services. This role is considered to be a functional leadership role without people management duties.
I encourage everyone to ignore Bryan Johnson, whose not-so-secret goal is to sell supplements to gullible people and has nothing to do with actual science.
Yeah, my thought was hair (looks like implants, but what do I know) and manicured brows. And then the skin that looks like it doesn't see much sun, so it's undamaged but also a bit pallid/grey.
As if Ozempic shortage wasn't bad enough already, we need those kind of posts to make it even worse.
> If you search for "Google Chrome" through the address bar, it will bring up Bing's search results with a Microsoft Edge header banner claiming that "there's no need to download a new web browser."

People forgot what it was to Google back in the day, where google was always showing a notification box to download their Google Chrome. So MS now uses their tactics. But they have grater leverage - they control OS and browser. And in this way they are not shooting themselves in the foot, but trying to keep the casual user base who doesn't care what color their internet gatway is.

The only pity would be Windows not respecting default browser choice when opening links.

And talking about Manifest V3 is some kind of mistake from MS... well, it is a chromium browser, what would you expect? Guess MS doesn't want to fork too deep from chromium. If users care about Manifest V3 then MS greatest competitor - Google - is also out of equation.
We auto devalue everything a human can do as easy. Navigation is a given soon after walking. It's so easy a animal or child can do it intuitively. Until they can't and there are traffic jams.

My personal recommendation is flow field and ROAM. Works excellent for the spring engine
There is a very weird lack of interest in slowing down or reversing aging in the scientific/medical community in general. To me it seems like it should be a top priority. Life is extremely short and extending our lives shouldn't be a terribly hard feat given there are plenty of biologically immortal and long lived organisms all over our planet.
In the energetic embroidered artwork of Uganda's business and sports scene, one name radiates brilliantly — Emmanuel Katto. These multi-gifted people wear a few caps, succeeding as an industry icon and business person as well as making a permanent imprint as a financial backer, donor, and rally expert.
Electric Car Models Eligible for $7,500 US Tax Credit Cut to 13
Lulu does not make 'high-quality hardcovers'.
Really? Tearing down the OP because of the TLD the forum uses? That's just lame.
> Or rather most things are better in other western countries with big economies?

Not sure which other countries you're thinking of, but each of then have their own issues. E.g. the UK has insane house prices and its rail is awful (I live here).
OTOH, my grandma is a bit older and has eaten oatmeal for breakfast for the last 50+ years. All that we can establish from these anecdotes is that neither fried eggs nor oatmeal will definitely kill you before you reach 90.
> But we live in a concrete society, [and] with concrete social and historical circumstances and political realities in this society, it is perfectly obvious that when something like a computer is invented, then it is going to be adopted will be for military purposes. It follows from the concrete realities in which we live, it does not follow from pure logic. But we're not living in an abstract society, we're living in the society in which we in fact live.

> If you look at the enormous fruits of human genius that mankind has developed in the last 50 years, atomic energy and rocketry and flying to the moon and coherent light, and it goes on and on and on -- and then it turns out that every one of these triumphs is used primarily in military terms. So it is not reasonable for a scientist or technologist to insist that he or she does not know -- or cannot know -- how it is going to be used.

-- Joseph Weizenbaum

That is not fear. That is being serious and unflinching, if anything.

> We can all wring our hands in fear over what the new technology might do, or we can solve the problems we care about.

I'm doing neither. I said it's a valid question, with which you agree. The rest is a straw man apropos nothing anyone actually said, here, and wringing your hands about it. It's a way bigger waste of time than asking a simple question and let those who want to answer that, and let those who don't want answer it simply don't answer it, instead of making up this "issue" with the question itself.

> Authenticity was hard before this, and it'll be hard after.

So "nothing changes", but technology is super important? You could say the same about, say, curing cancer. People will live for a while and then die, with or without it. Why since it makes no difference, what'd be the problem with "fearing" it?
Playing with Fontconfig (2020)
Well, it was before gender equity and women certainly didn't want to look unlady-like having to crank up their cars in the street. Also, as another commenter said, backfiring engine could traumatise a person holding a crank. Horror stories like death from a broken jaw were an extreme rarity, but broken fingers were pretty much normal, and could ruin young woman's marriage prospects given how badly disfigured could fingers become given medical tech of the time.