skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not the parent, but at my previous job we used lots of JVM languages, plus some python and a tiny bit of JS. We were not particularly successful in getting truly hermetic builds with it - a big part of was a lack of headcount actually working on it.

My main takeaway is this: if you're the only one in the room asking for bazel, it's probably a bad choice. Bazel requires a lot of investment to stay nice to use, particularly in a polyglot environment. I've experienced endless friction getting things to work "in bazel" that would otherwise be simple using language-specific tooling.

In my opinion, the benefits (caching, build speed, a single build tool) did not outweigh the costs (nonstandard tool means you are always operating in hard-mode compared to using language-specific build tools, it's a ton of work to make actually hermetic, devs often aren't familiar with it and don't like writing BUILD files, editor support is extremely lacking outside of IntelliJ).
Saved you a click : security feature. Very visible from a distance, not so much up close. Might indicate fake plates to police.
Build a startup or side project faster with these SaaS templates
> After a few rounds of bastardization, ransel became “randoseru” in Japanese.

I thought there was actually a formal transliteration system the Japanese use for foreign words? Like with cutlet becoming katsu retsu. Not quite “bastardization”.
They announced the GPT store already - Dont know when it will be avail, but they are trying to determine a rev share model for GPTs that others pay to access, then share whatever revenue with the GPT creators.

For me, I am having a tough time weeding through whats free and whats not. Which makes analysis paralysis and confusion from "dazzle them with details, baffle them with bullshit"

I need an ELI5 list of the various models, gpts, and their pricing models....
We Could Fix Everything, We Just Don't
> What am I missing?

Likely a disrespect for a living wage for a common craftsman, and a misunderstanding of what quality goods actually are.

Certainly a lot of kids here survived on cheap $25 jansports, but did the people making them?
Maybe you know this one: for UI in games, do devs create an entire windowing environment from scratch? It seems like that would be the best way to do it but man what a lot of work.
> Is whiling away your time at the beach any better than sending memos (emails) around?

I think 99% of humans would say 'yes'.
I email epubs to my kindle frequently and they open and read just like any ebook. I last tried this a week ago and it was fine.
What about a silk eye mask? I sleep with them at home even
At the orgs I contribute at, we use data security posture management tools (DSPM) to filter sensitive data from model training ingest. Mostly regex string equivalents, but also heuristics and context aware tagging of data.
Nova had a great show about how many fakes there are out there when it comes to the dead sea scrolls (including the Museum of the Bible):

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/dead-sea-scroll-detectiv...

The intermediaries they go through to acquire these scraps of paper seem like total scam artists.
As a 40 year old "institutionalized" laborer at the bottom of the IT pyramid I also cannot envision such a life. What does that time look like where my needs are met without having to sell my labor? Is it through a violent overthrowing of the systems of capitalism? Is it through the less violent revolution of Universal Basic Income? Or do we need to subvert capitalism from the other end with post-scarcity economics where energy is free and abundant. Or will post-scarcity only happen with free energy and some sort of Star Trek'esq replicator.

What I CAN envision is my labor becoming worthless. A level of worthless that no amount of education or personal character could make valuable again.

Its great to talk about not having to work. The mechanics of how we get there typically amount to hand-waving magic. Which if that is how we get there then I also want a pony.
Three cheers for the Jansport!
While I think Japanese society has lots of good traits and outcomes such as a low crime rate, and a ethic to involve everyone in process improvements, this is another clear example of what the English call "keeping up appearances". It seems Japanese call it "tatemae" -
https://japan-dev.com/blog/honne-and-tatemae
FYI, it's best to submit a URL (probably your github) and then add further information as a comment.

As for the tool itself, it looks pretty nice! The default layout is good although it will be worthwhile to experiment with others. Consider also using colormaps for metrics like path length, degreeness, or network centrality. Gephi is a highly developed open source graph visualization project with a lot of plugins, which will give you a lot of ideas and allow you to experiment freely.
I got master's in CS from Brown. Fwiw, I was really pleased with the instruction.
It's a failure of imagination.

Research FreeRossDAO or UkraineDAO.

Literally changing the world and saving lives with the tech you can't imagine being punk.

Cope.
The 18-24 cohort (unsurprisingly) had less sex. Being in high school and starting college will do that to you, especially during a pandemic that prevented students from moving out.

You can't have a kid out of high school and expect to raise them with a decent life anymore. This is a global trend btw, not just the US.
California has prop 13, meaning your property tax increases are capped, but if property changes hands, the property tax resets to a more reasonable (and much higher rate). Which makes the property market even more illiquid in California.
While I don’t disagree with your point in general, and if this was an article about Rust, D, or maybe even Zig, I may have left off the part about C-esque vs C++-esque languages.

However, in a topic about Odin, Hare, or Go, I think the comment was germane. These languages value simplicity as a stated goal, and whatever one thinks of the position of C on the simplicity scale, I’d like to think that it is a valid consideration in language comparisons.

I will certainly acknowledge a subjective basis for defining and assessing ‘simplicity’ in PL design, but I can not put a language as complex as Rust in a bucket with C, Odin, Go, or Hare. The syntax, semantics, and implementation issues associated with ad-hoc polymorphism alone take it into another strata.

I am obviously aware of who I’m talking to and that you would certainly be the person who would know plenary of dev’s from any number of backgrounds happy to have replaced C with Rust. So I’m not trying to imply or say that it doesn’t happen. But there is a difference in working in Rust (happily, preferably, or otherwise) vs C, and in compiling a list of language similar to C. I took the question to hinge on similarity (in at least the complexity characteristic, if not the syntax or type characteristics), while I think you looked at it as a question about valid or preferable replacements for development.

Finally, I’m sure it was personal preference and philosophy that led me to assume complexity characteristics were inherently at issue in the GP post’s request for a list. You were certainly correct to point out it is a pretty narrow POV.
Guilty as charged… it’s just such a great experience and the incentives align.
Too complex. If I had the time and resources I'd love to work on a good internet "captcha" system for age verification. Basically training ML with responses from different age groups to certain patterns, text or imagery - not sure what exactly. It would not be perfect, one cannot classify "18 year old" accurately across the globe, but I'm quite sure a good AI, somehow, could get a ballpark maturity answer that would block age-sensitive content in the majority of cases, which would be much better than what we have now.
I personally find it easier to sleep when my pillow is cool. Silk feels cool to touch. I'd image that it would help. Not sure if it being mulberry makes any difference.
CellLVM: A proof-of-concept LLVM to Excel spreadsheet compiler
This is what I've been thinking lately i.e. C and Lua (throw in LuaJIT too if speed is needed).

But I've found out that using functional parts of modern C++ (bear with me) as a higher level language with C underpinnings also works very well. But you need tremendous discipline to do it successfully. For eg - using only C POD structs, no constructors, no exceptions, no inheritance, limited template usage etc. Some would say a very C style C++ with a lot of syntax sugar.
Not really.

You should have the tech to have as much privacy as you want. The two ideas are compatible.
I buy Jansport because the zippers never break.
Looks like you have two ideal worlds:

1. One with all content free (the original comment)

2. One with “reasonable” monetization (this comment and current situation in the real world)
If you're writing articles about it for the Wall Street Journal, you're still pretty boring.

(I'm not 60, but I can see it from here.)
Wayland Enjoyed Many Successes in 2023
That might be the next big contribution – performance in perceptually catching the features of a not-so-good recording – for example, with a webcam style microphone.
I enjoyed the article but like much of online content about Japan it comes off like obsessive fan service.

Can you imagine carrying 1-2kg empty backpack with you every day? Just because something took long to make doesn't mean it's superior in production or quality or even perception. It's pretty, fashionable and the tradition is wholesome but that's where it ends.

I got a free backpack with my new Thinkpad laptop recently. It's light, well designed, mass produced, easy to personalize - would take this over the 450$ school bags any time of the year.
How it is different from performing chaos exercises using LitmusChaos or ChaosMesh?
That is a power granted to congress, not a constitutional right.

That is, the constitution grants Congress the authority to create a legislative IP right. It does not create a constitutional IP right.

You can tell, because Congress could say: “stuff it, no IP rights for anyone. Copyright no longer exists for new works”, and that would be constitutional.
I’ve had this same conversation with people in investment banking, they work very long hours often with no weekend. The idea of not having to work a job is inconceivable to them. Even the ones who have hobbies outside of work like music, sports, etc felt strongly about the importance of their job.

They did seem to want shorter hours, but they took a lot of pride in how much time they spent working, humble bragging towards each other about how many hours they worked last week for example.

I think our work titles are too tied with our social status and identity for anything to change here.
"That's ludicrous!", he says, as he avoids looking at the Filson bag next to his chair.

(Although, in fairness, I don't expect to ever have to buy another bag, and I'll take better care of this than I would've any bag my elders gave me as a child.)
1. A proper retiree who is able to indulge in hobbies is very different from someone barely sustaining themselves on basic income (?) or a version of it.

2. Sure, but in the near future this is baseless techno-optimism just like fusion or colonizing the Solar System

3. Today they are a vocal, but mostly powerless minority. They cannot, by and large affect national welfare programs. Imagine if such a small minority held power over all means of housing and production?

4. Some work will always be required, even just to live. For now, to maintain a western developed standard of living, it's actually quite a bit of work, when you consider e.g. high tech electronics, transportation system, healthcare.

You're countering your own strawman arguments here.
ChatGPT fails due to lack of easy confirmation of correctness.

Most physical world thiigs have immediate feedback of incorrectness.

Bumping into something unexpectedly or falling over could be a built in way for models to self improve.

Self driving cars go WAY too fast for our current level of processing/sensors.

All IMHO.
In retrospect, the most ridiculous thing about kids giving each other shit about money is... they're kids.

Until they get to ~14+, they don't have any claim to having earned any of their family's wealth.
These humans are a curious species.
Victim blaming isn’t a good look, no matter who is the victim.
Check out what I wrote again. I repeat, I do not use GPT to summarize.
Same link / discussion 3 days ago

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38813917
It's funny how software interviews run so opposite to this work reality.
Mostly because the beach is a treat. After a while it’s just a place like another, with sand, salt, bugs, seaweed, etc.

If you fish it’s productive, else it’s not. Pushing emails could result in apprehending a criminal or treatment for a disease…
That night-mode option in Saabs is pretty incredible. It simplifies the driving experience to an impressive degree.
So much of what passes for 'requirements gathering' in software development historically has consisted of precisely this kind of heuristic-collecting. Trying to come up with rigorous rules for, as here, 'when should we serve cocktails on planes', so we can build software that enshrines those rules, so that at some point, someone will be refused a cocktail under circumstances when one might help. Congratulations, software engineers. You made someone's day a little worse.

The goal of software engineering isn't to make rules lawyers that implement the same logic as staff do only with less imagination and discretion. That's just a shortcut to reducing staff numbers while making worse decisions and reducing service quality.

The goal of software engineering should be to make systems that can support making better decisions. The rules your staff use today to figure out what flights should serve cocktails are themselves policies that evolved in service of some broader business goal, taking into account behind the scenes information like service costs, customer satisfaction, competitive analysis, brand intentions, etc.

Build software that supports that process.
> No, it’s everything. Can’t think of anything that wouldn’t count. Our issues are sponsored results crowd out the first page, strange no name companies crowding out brand names, can’t sort by retailer, or any usefu sort or filter mechanism.

If it stopped there it would be almost okay, but then the page for the brand might get you items comingled with counterfeits.
I’m curious as to how?
On average, the people you know are more socially successful than the people you don't know.
They just spam Bieber, Celine Dion, and Drake to make those numbers instead of sampling smaller acts.
I was talking about randoseru with my daughter just the other day. She and her sister both attended Japanese public elementary schools and used the same randoseru for all six years. Though she was tall for her age, she complained about the weight of it then and doesn’t have fond memories of it now. Her son will be starting at a public elementary school in Yokohama in a couple of years, and she doesn’t seem eager to get a randoseru for him. While some of the kids I see walking to and from that school have randoseru, most are carrying lighter and more versatile cloth backpacks.

This grandparent will be happy to pay for whatever my daughter wants for her son, though it’s likely that she will insist on paying for it herself.
Do you expect a sensible “because of reason X” answer to those questions?

I have zero expectation of rationality from this type of thing. People will give reasons to buy a new one, just like you gave reasons to use an old one. But ultimately it is the cost/benefit of aligning behaviors with other people which will drive their decisions.
Video Game Industry Revenues by Year and Platform
It's not my moral duty to keep the makers of expensive bags employed.

I mean, I do that anyway as a hobby, but I don't owe it to anyone.
Archive only shows part of the article for me. Is this a WSJ countermeasure or is my browser behaving badly?

Edit: was browser issue (FF/Android). Worked when desktop site was toggled.
https://archive.ph/htxsN
Is there any actual reason this is not open source?
Because profits based on social pressure. One of the things I least like about Japanese culture.
“The new findings don’t cast doubt on the 100,000 real Dead Sea Scroll fragments, most of which lie in the Shrine of the Book, part of the Israel Museum, Jerusalem. However, the report’s findings raise grave questions about the “post-2002” Dead Sea Scroll fragments, a group of some 70 snippets of biblical text that entered the antiquities market in the 2000s. Even before the new report, some scholars believed that most to all of the post-2002 fragments were modern fakes.”
Maybe so, but not necessarily true a priori.
As far as I know most of the laws don't provide an exception if you look old enough.
YKK zippers?
People who still think C is basically a good idea?
Curious coincidence, I bought a randoseru (ランドセル) [1][2][3] early this morning and complained to my wife all the way to the store. She doesn’t want our children to look different at school. They are already different enough for being hāfu [4] and she doesn’t want to traumatize them even more. The bags are stiff and, in my eyes, quite ugly, and children are supposed to carry several books every day, good exercise but there are much better alternatives. Schools are just too bully to let anyone use a different style.

As the saying goes → 出る杭は打たれる “The stake that sticks out will be driven down.”

[1] https://tsuchiya-randoseru.jp

[2] https://www.seiban.co.jp

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randoseru

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hāfu
Work is what you're doing when you'd rather be doing something else.
Service industry jobs like bartenders are directly doing stuff customers actually want and are willing to pay for.

If that doesn’t make the cut then 100% of jobs are BS. You don’t “need” a farmer when you can just plant your own food etc.
nearest object can be dynamic thing
Interesting points about the nuances of a $450 bag that’s rather impractical when it’s more a story than a justification. I’m just here to comment that this was a lovely read, thanks for posting!
This, to me, is identical to the concept of "reverse budgeting" (aka "pay yourself first" or "every dollar has a job" in YNAB terms) in the financial domain, but instead applied to the time problem space.

If you assign every hour a job, and you take care of "paying yourself first" by taking into account critical/high-priority time-spend first and then allocating for yourself the liesure time last; assuming that your estimates are correct and realistic and don't forget to include all overhead, you can safely say "hey, I have budgeted away 4 hours of free time today and I can use it guilt-free because I already have accounted for all my critical tasks time-spend."

The reason this is not often done however is because it's hard. Time continuously moves, you can never pause to analyze your usage. And the assumption that "your estimates are correct include all overhead" is really hard to ensure - you need to have excellent time tracking and estimation skills to inform/predict those estimates. And time tracking is too much effort to do manually, so it requires good supporting systems, which require intensive classification techniques, which really don't exist yet.

But I digress. We're basically discussing budgeting, but for hours instead of currency, here.
I'll hazard a guess - Japan is a walking society, and these backpacks are being worn every day, laden with books, back and forth from home to school, or on buses or the subway.

Americans generally get driven to school. The backpack is worn only between classes at school and then moved from car trunk to home, not worn during those times.

I personally wore out a $100 Eddie Bauer backpack every other year or so during middle/high school. I walked to school every day for over a mile, rain or shine. The zippers would completely fail, or the shoulder straps would detach. Eddie Bauer had a lifetime warranty so they replaced the backpacks without question.
He absolutely did all those things.
Am I supposed to believe teens not having sex is bad?

By all means kids should be educated on sex and have access to contraceptive. But I thought everyone still agreed abstinence was the ideal.

Edit: I misunderstood the age range in the article (18-30, thought it was younger). My comment doesnt really apply then.
If 5 people can afford the real estate and 15 people cannot, it isn't that weird that 5 people are staying and 15 are leaving. That the price equilibrium is reached means that a lot of people can't afford those prices, which will result in a net loss of population until a population equilibrium is reached. And it isn't weird for very expensive but smaller places like Aspen to have already reached both of those equilibriums, so their population is relatively stable but they are still very expensive places to live.
AI so close to breaking the current copyright and many of us are very excited to see this finally happen! We just need not to snooze on the replacement and not fall for copyright propaganda which is already invading social media.
I don't think it's possible with any acceptable accuracy. If it's based on culture and media, you would be excluding anyone who didn't grow up in the local area. If its some kind of IQ/competency test, there would be too much overlap between the most mature kids and mentally impaired adults.

There would be close to no accurate test for the difference between an 17 year old and an 18 year old.
It is like a biological company named Umbrella.
Google used to have this feature built-in, I dont understand why they got rid of it.
https://saddlebackleather.com/thin-front-pocket-leather-back... might be closest, but more expensive.

https://saddlebackleather.com/tumbled-leather-drawstring-bac... is cheaper and more realistic, perhaps.

https://saddlebackleather.com/leather-backpack-lg is only 2 pounds and cheaper still.
> Everything else ("it's handcrafted!", "it's durable!") is a reverse justification from there.

Thanks for this, exactly. It's the same thing with designer bags. After the rise of "superfake" luxury bags that cost literally a tenth of the real thing, I remember reading some blogs trying to argue why people should buy authentic, basing it on BS "handcrafted quality!" reasons (the reason they were called "superfakes" in the first place is because the quality was basically as good as the original). Sure, some of the reasons were actually true (it does cost a lot more to pay workers in France compared to China), but any rationale besides "I want other people to know I spent a lot of money on a bag" is just post hoc rationalization.
Yeah but on the other hand, this is a pretty useless way to give intuition on a concept as simple as mean squared error.
I am not a fan of the fuckcars crowd because I think their abrasive approach is doomed to fail. At the same time, I'm sorry but I just don't buy that there is a human right to a car centric lifestyle. I'll take it more seriously when we seriously address the many problems caused by excessive car reliance. To name a few: severe injury due to collisions, obesity and other health problems due to inactivity, noise and light pollution, destruction of natural habitat/migration patterns as well as mass roadkill, fragmenting of communities, destruction of neighborhoods, the loss of childhood independence, the loss of mobility for those who cannot safely drive, the subsistence trap for low income workers who rely on their cars to get to work and thus can't save any money, depletion of fossil fuels and the list goes on...

And, yes, of course there are also benefits. On the net though, I think mass private vehicle ownership is one of the worst mistakes we've ever made although I don't blame any individual for their choices. The reasons people use cars are rational but the externalities of mass car ownership are significantly and ultimately I believe unsustainable and undesirable. At the same time, chill, nobody is coming to take your cars or your guns.