skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> First do it

Sounds like your codebase will be full of shitty half-backed half-non-needed "features" with a lot bugs, legacy, and misdirection.

> then do it right

Sounds like your codebase will have a lot of hyped, now-dead, trends-of-the-moment frameworks while your team keeps arguing what's "right".

> then do it better

Sounds like your codebase will have a lot of rewrite in the new hyped, not-yet-dead, trends-of-the-moment frameworks while actual business logic will be ignored.

In my experience, this is the worst advice if we are talking about software engineering. I would advise the opposite: "Is this needed? really needed? nerd out on why it's needed."
If the goal is to move all the commits of one repo into another repo, Git provides subtree merges:

https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-git/about-git-s...

For companies that started out making lots of small repositories that want to moev incrementally to a monorepo, this strategy can be useful because it sets up the smaller repo as a self-contained unit of the larger repo, preserving things like git commit history and git blames. After a subtree merge, further steps can more tightly integrate the code into the larger repository (i.e., so that it is no longer wholly contained in the subtree).
I also want to note that some people are looking at using ML/DL to generate placement solutions, even though DREAMPlace is still a key recent work in this area that at the core uses analytical placement, although cleverly using deep learning libraries and features.

For example, the VTR people are looking at RL to pick what actions to take during FPGA placement for their simulated annealing placer (see: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9415585).

I also know this paper/poster was indexed recently under OpenRevew but I'm still waiting for some more implementation details to look at: https://openreview.net/forum?id=6GR8KqWCWf

FPGA routing I don't think anyone has touched on using ML/DL but I do know that there is some talk about using ML/DL models with current routing approaches to replace search heuristics (think like replacing or augmenting something like A*) or do routability predictions. Certainly, there are probably many ways to use RL in routing as there are many places in current algorithms to intelligently make certain heuristic decisions.

Edit: I also want to note that there are a ton of works that also use ML/DL to tune the "hyperparameters" of EDA tools such as placers and routers. Think ML/DL for back-box non-linear optimization.
Yes it's like corporate speak and very long winded. Also the way it outputs headings and lists is very identifiable.
Off-topic, but I just wanted to point out that we may be seeing a historic cross here: The "who wants to be hired" thread is currently surpassing the "who's hiring" thread in number of replies.
> There is almost nothing as satisfying to me as being able to fix appliances.

On the other hand, a broken appliance is a real let-down. I have this thing that was working, and now I have (laundry/vacuuming/dishes/food) piling up and I have to fix this immediately.
Who is going to wash the dishes?

Who is going to chop the wood for the cooking fire?

Who is going to churn the butter?

What galley slaves will row the cargo ships?

Who is going to drive the oxen ploughing the fields?

Reading the article reveals that the first thing in it is a woman who was annoyed by women having to clean the home, and who invented a self-cleaning home. That was in the 1970s. We're long past being able to have self-cleaning toilets if we wanted that. And pre-fab homes. And and and.

You can retreat into 'God of the gaps' of ever-shrinking necessary work, but that's usually a last ditch argument by people who have nothing stronger to argue with. Goodness forbid that your position be reduced to "toilets should have to be cleaned by a person, and it should be organised by money, so done by someone poor" as that would be strawman bad.

Yes self-cleaning toilets would take iron ore mining and steel manufacturing and so on, but factory work has been more automatable decade by decade, and it won't be a thousand years of current rates of change before basically everything is automatable.
Finding Your Best Ideas
LOL, exactly what I thought...
Making Discrimination OK Again
> Ah that's why Europe is such a shithole and the US is an enlightened kingdom.

The USA is both richer and more democratic than Europe. You will need to accept this fact before mocking the Americans.

Europe is a place where most countries are partly run by Brussels, which is a totalitarian system. Consider the energy that Americans put into their Presidential elections vs the entirely secret and inexplicable process that led to von der Leyen being able to legislatively control Europe. People may not like Biden or Trump but they can at least explain the process through which they became President, and it is at least theoretically democratic. Nobody outside of Germany even knew who vDL was before she suddenly turned up as the most powerful woman in Europe.

> That is just wrong. Parties often commit to specific things.

Which nobody takes seriously because the best that can be hoped for is for the party to enter coalition, at which point everything is up for negotiation and they are guaranteed to have to discard many of their commitments.

>> Because the system is in some sense inherently unstable you have a lot of government collapses

> That's why Angela Merkel was only in her position for 2 years.

Merkel is an excellent example of the problem: after a deadlocked PR election she presided over an entirely mandateless caretaker government that lasted half a year, because German politicians couldn't form a workable coalition. In theory she was meant to do nothing during this time and simply preserve the status quo, but that is impossible to constitutionally enforce and in fact she continued to rule exactly as before, including signing Germany up for new foreign policy commitments.

The USA simply never has the problem of the previous president continuing to rule after losing support in an election. It is a problem largely unique to PR (the UK went through a coalition setup in 2010 but it only lasted 5 days).

> even if its the case, its not necessarily wrong.

The primary point of PR is to try and ensure the views of minorities are represented. If you disagree with that goal, you may as well just support the much simpler and more stable FPTP system.
Because more often than not good enough is good enough. Electron is a great example. Look at the market share of slack, discord, spotify, etc.

Optimizing as step one is a very good way to not ship on time and miss opportunities to competition.
I wonder if places like RunPod have a special agreement with NVidia, there's some way they're working around this (not installing the drivers?), or if they're just flagrantly offering it as they offer several consumer card options in what's presumably a datacenter environment.
I'm wondering if a constraint solving library like optaplanner could help here - believe it uses simulated annealing.

Hey, maybe a use case for Dwave? j/k.
Why not? Ibelieve in the contrary!
Right now I don't support multiple groups. That was on the roadmap, but I haven't put it in yet.

I figured most people didn't need multiple groups immediately, but if I hear it's important, I'll definitely prioritize it!

Thanks for trying it out with a more "realistic" data set. I have some friends' lists, but would love for others to try it with their own data.

Let me know what you think! Is this a show stopper?
more offers, maybe. But LinkedIn isn't some super necessary tool for tech workers to begin with. I use it as a fancy co-worker/potential job list and nothing more. I even cull contacts after the latter is no longer in consideration, which goes against how you should use LinkedIn (to help find indirect contacts).

I imagine for fields like marketing and design that LinkedIn is as important as Github is to a programmer, though. Also Freelance types of work. Fields where who you know can be almost as important as what you know, and where most hires are made based on gut feelings. Someone
HackerOne's customers are the companies running bug bounty programs. You'd think they'd be a bit more careful about who they allow to spam their customers with clout-seeking LLM garbage.
I find this interpretation interesting, because I would agree with your sibling commentors, though I also agree with you that this isn't a dumb question. I think that you are answering "this is what Aaron wants to change," whereas others are answering "this is what the current principle means." That is, I think the principle is about compilers and their implementations vs code that users write. The full text from the Charter (covered in the post but not in your parents' question):

> 1. Existing code is important, existing implementations are not. A large body of C code exists of considerable commercial value. Every attempt has been made to ensure that the bulk of this code will be acceptable to any implementation conforming to the Standard. The Committee did not want to force most programmers to modify their C programs just to have them accepted by a conforming translator.

>

> On the other hand, no one implementation was held up as the exemplar by which to define C: It is assumed that all existing implementations must change somewhat to conform to the Standard.

This reads very clearly to me. However,

> Aaron seems to view porting a non-compliant C program as loosely equivalent to a security bugfix that changes some low-level details of certain implementations, but doesn't have much impact on the overall code. It might be annoying to fix your K&R declarations / etc, but it won't undo the hard work you did in parsing HTTP headers.

I do think you're getting at something here, which is the change Aaron is advocating for. I think it's a bit more subtle than that though: most people think of C as being 100% backwards compatible. But that's not really true. Famously, for example, C++ removed the gets function outright. I think Aaron isn't arguing that backwards compatibility should be thrown out entirely, but that the committee should build in a formal process for deprecation and eventual removal, and that that is better than the status quo. And that this power should be used wisely, not making changes that would be a burden on users for little gain. Just that it is okay to give users a little burden for big gains, rather than the current status of "basically no burden at all, but also improvements are difficult."
Your first read was wrong then (there weren’t even lots of comments) and is even more wrong now. More importantly, meta of this sort gets comments moderated so it’s mostly a way to ruin a potentially fine comment.
People encrypt at rest because it is a specific requirement that the data is encrypted at rest. Maybe to meet regulatory requirements or orders from above. Regulators are not going to object to data being handed over on court orders.

If the regulator or the management requiring it are OK with the cloud provider doing it (and AWS and the like do their best to ensure that) then using their keys and key management is the easiest way to do it.

Apart from cloud backups, in most cases the data will be decrypted in their cloud anyway, so you have to trust them.
RunPod is fairly large and openly advertises the consumer cards. I wonder if they have an agreement?
From what info are you assuming that no one did? A middle school boy who was on the plane said "荷物を取り出そうという人もいた"[0], "there were also people who tried to get their luggage".

[0] https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240102/k10014307191000.ht...
Why are we calling the subject "LLM" as if it had agency? Clickbaity title
Yes but, as someone else pointed out, Harvard is a private school that takes federal funding. The Supreme Court’s decision wouldn’t affect them either way.
Having said that, the CGA card does not actually have its own clock. It takes the NTSC base frequency of 14.31818 MHz from the OSC-pin of the ISA bus.
On early PCs, such as the IBM 5150/5160, the CPU frequency is also derived from this same base clock (which is why you get the oddly specific speed of 4.77 MHz).
100%.

“Do it right” should always be the first goal. Then you make concessions to make sure it works in the flawed reality it needs to operate in.

A classic example from back in the day (maybe it’s still this way): don’t just design your webpages for IE. Write the markup and stylesheets as they ought to be, then amend as necessary to make it look correct for each browser’s quirks.
Citation needed. No one said that, and so if you heard it, then you should see a therapist about your hallucinations.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to a Mac. I can only run Safari at BrowserStack. So I can't test it and fix it.

But this is Open Source and anyone who has a Mac can test it and fix this issue. I can't.
Location: Indianapolis, IN

Willing to relocate: Yes

Remote: Yes

Technologies: Ruby, Go, Javascript, React, Node.js, Express, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, AWS, DigitalOcean

Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F-IHaT81F4gCORVeeFeXmqWB96i...

Email: khuu.tuyetmai@gmail.com

Hello there! I am a software engineer with experience in Ruby, Go, and JavaScript. I recently co-created [Laridae], a zero-downtime, a Zero-downtime, reversible, schema migration tool in PostgreSQL with prebuilt integration into GitHub Action workflows.

Read Laridae's case study here:
https://laridae-migrations.github.io/

In a past life, I was a PharmD - Doctor of Pharmacy. I am an excellent communicator with extensive experience in situation de-escalation.

Currently, I am looking for a back-end focus or full stack Software Engineering role. Please feel free to reach out for a chat about anything :)
That's why to this day they can't implement a simple integer type
ID.me | Remote - Anywhere Continental US | Full-Time | SDE III, SDE IV, SDE V, SDM-III | No Visa Sponsorship

ID.me simplifies how people securely prove and share their identity online. The company empowers people to control their data through a portable and trusted login, which means they don’t need to create a new password when visiting sites that have the ID.me button.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated digital migration for many critical services. Those services require a trusted identity to safeguard against fraud and help ensure people are who they claim to be. With ID.me, login and identity credentials move with people, which can reduce the time and frustration of having to verify at multiple sites and set up multiple passwords.

ID.me is a credential service provider compliant with federal standards for digital identity verification.

We're hiring for SDE III/IV/V (tech lead) and SDMs. We're looking for dedicated, experienced engineers passionate about scalable system architecture, able to lead initiatives in areas like monitoring, automated testing, experimentation, and infrastructure as code. Ideal candidates will champion innovative solutions and exhibit leadership in these critical domains.

Our Stack: Ruby on Rails, Sidekiq, PostgreSQL, Redis, React, Terraform. We'll be introducing GoLang soon.

Check out all our roles at: https://boards.greenhouse.io/idme

I'm an engineering manager on the team, if you have any questions you can reach me directly at sergey.cherman+hn AT id.me Please no staffing or recruiting firms, individuals only.
>>>Most people use their phone in portrait mode

We have invented a new word for you to incorporate into your comments:

"OPTIONS"
This is about the "8088 MPH" demo for an original IBM PC ( previously in 2015: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9338944 )

Then "succeeded" by "Area 5150" past year: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32394195
Daniel Stenberg[1] brought up a good point: the complexity here is that curl is used all over the world, and there's certainly nothing wrong with a non-English speaker using an LLM to help write their bug report. So the superficial giveaways that the English text is LLM-generated doesn't necessarily mean the report's content was LLM-generated.

[1] https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2024/01/02/the-i-in-llm-stands-f...
Of course it's possibly vle. Anything is possible.

But you are just proposing a lot of scary sounding "what-ifs" without evidence.

What if the tech companies use their influence to summon the Devil? What if they secretly are controlling all of the politicians? What if they are forcing pineapple on pizza? Why aren't they secretly running the world?

Sure, lots of things will be possible soon. That doesn't mean it has to be happening.
Welcome to a journey through the annals of financial wisdom and investment philosophy as articulated by Warren Buffett, the legendary investor, and his conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway. Over the years, the annual Letters to Stockholders have become more than just financial reports—they are profound insights into the mind of one of the greatest investors of our time.
It seems at some point a human (Dinesh B?) had reviewed and posted it. So, it's fine to use an LLM to summarize and analyze some piece of code, but then after Daniel responded that the analysis was junk, they persist at it, assuming Daniel was wrong, and just re-prompted LLM to paraphrase the crap again.

Let's assume this person is doing it for clout, it's surprising they don't see how this behavior would hurt their own reputation.
*sensors
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Maybe

Technologies: TypeScript, C++, LLVM, Swift, JavaScript, Node.js, interested in Rust and Zig

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/agentcooper

Github: https://github.com/agentcooper

Email: artem.tyurin@gmail.com

Hi, I'm Artem and I'm interested in compilers, browsers, web platform, and developer tools.
I wonder if Atlassian encourages and sells this as an ideal use case [for JIRA]. What a great way to make it really painful to leave their system if in order to make sense of your repo history you to need to maintain the references to their system. They are making your repo dependent on their ticket system...
Thanks for sharing! I'll pass this along to my family. They'll be interested to learn he is known in Chile.
Ah i'm very sorry. I ctrl+f'd his name, but should obviously have just read a bit more carefully.
I'm surprised they're trying to gut/reverse Prop 209 again. Their latest attempt was defeated by a larger margin than the original proposition passed back in the 90s. And this was during the fall of 2020, which would have been about as good a time as any to make an attempt.

Also, with the recent SCOTUS ruling, the state would be more constrained in terms of what it would be allowed to do under the US constitution. It seems like this will end up rallying their opposition and driving Asian voters away from Dems.
"we'll build it in Electron" isn't a kludge or temporary decision though. It is an acknowledgement that there aren't enough devs on payroll to support a true-native app. The tradeoff is RAM for developer time and hiring efficiency. That is a pretty good trade; RAM is there to be used.

The technical issue here is that the protocol is closed, not that the client is fat. So someone in a RAM-constrained environment can't choose to make different trade offs. But the protocol being closed, while annoying as a user, is definitely a strategic choice.
Says not a three letter agency ;)
Do you feel that including drugs in the therapy was a benefit over more common dialog-type therapy? If so how was it different?
This seems to be the common advise given, but I don't fully agree. There have been many times in my career where a DB was on a VM with the storage attached via a cloud providers block storage. When asked if we should move it to k8s, people are quick to mention k8s doesn't do well with persistent storage. However all of the big cloud providers offer the ability to easily create a persistent volume in k8s that then just creates a block device, attaches it to the k8s host and makes it available to the pod.

So in both situations you have the same IO limits of block storage. The question is does k8s persistent volume api add enough of an IO bottleneck to cause issues, IME that isn't the case.

Now if you want direct attached NVMe drives for higher IO than a network attached block storage will give, then it might be easier with a VM vs k8s, but I can't speak to that much.
dollarization makes sense, the rest is just claptrap talk about cutting social services (and some of which would be a necessary conclusion anyway, because currently the spending is financed by simply money printing)

of course the extremely dramatic complete eradication of any kind of redistribution is almost surely not the optimal path to growth
It doesn’t look like it covers what I had to deal with to fix my Hunter Douglas blinds. (The kind you can lift and close by hand and they magically hold their position.)

They have a spring loaded thing called a “motor” and something with two cones and a string between them, called a transmission.

I managed to restring the transmission, but the motor went zing and broke inside when I was trying to wind it up again, so I ended up having to buy a new motor (I think around $30).
Are you using >=0.9? I havn't experience any stability issues and I use it at my full time developer job
Yup. I'm far from an authority on the matter (just learned about the Air Canada flight further up the thread and thought it was relevant), but I'd guess this supports the "it crashes" hypothesis.
Actually, I was surprised to learn last week that the `eqeqeq` rule that disallows `==` is not in ESLint's recommended set: https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/

(And I immediately enabled it for our codebase. Generally I like to just rely on the recommended non-stylistic rules, but this is such an easy footgun that everybody on my team already defaulted to adhering to, that I made an exception.)
Sure, I agree. And I also think that the lion's share of people prefer convenience over quality 99.99% of the time. I don't know if that's a mentality that can be changed, and Twitter captured most of that market.

You can only become the next twitter and be subject to the same flaws or try to seek out the relative minority that is seeking quality over noise.
Ive subbed watched something than canceled (thus paying for a month at a time) 6+ times this year on various streaming services (paramount+, mgm+, appletv+, disney+, etc etc). Wonder if that is skewing data?
Evolution might stop humans from solving climate change
I have to admit, I wonder how many lives would have been lost if this happened in America. "I have to get my laptop!" "where's my carry-on!?" "I think I left my phone!"
well you'd have a react-dev ML in 1998 where people would discuss OO vs closures and reactive observer macros on top of CPS web sessions https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10990-004-486...
These programs started in 2015. It's in the article.
therefore the need for security
Based on that article, it doesn't sound like Harvard is allowing them, it sounds like they have no power to stop them, since they're protesting near Harvard.
LORD was so much fun. I also ran a BBS, first on Wildcat (RIP graphics were amazing), then on RoboFX. Bought all of the above by saving up $2/week allowance.

RoboFX was insane. It was this little-known host that offered a full windowing system using a client that fit on a single disk. It had movable windows, image viewing, messaging, forums, downloads, the works. Truly incredible for the time, but it was released just at the end of the BBS era. Along with BeOS and WebOS, some of the saddest technologies that never caught on.

Thanks for the memories!
There's no good option to import something, you pay through the nose where brokerage fees greatly exceed the value of taxes collected on most items. The fees are deductible, but it's still an expense.

In theory he should have been under the exemption, can't speak to that. But $20 is extremely low.
For whatever reason, when I first read the name, I thought the Chrultrabook was an abbreviation for a Cthulhu-themed laptop.
I wouldn't consider it clickbait any more than "pedestrian struck by vehcile." It's implied that LLMs are tools.