skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How do you use it in the middle of a pipeline like the example with mutate?
Is it considered OK uploading every email to OpenAI? Asking for a friend.
The ‘logger’ command can also be useful.
I had a little play with RStudio and it seemed very expensive for what it did. But I am not an R programmer might be missing the point completely.
I watched the videos. The author doesn't have a MacBook Pro, he goes purely by specs (16GB RAM + 16GB GPU vs 8GB unified memory on MacBook). His price doesn't include a monitor or keyboard or cabling. The performance metrics are stable diffusion but the video doesn't list how long a MacBook takes (title suggests 6x longer).

Edit: I was wrong. He owns a MacBook Pro 8GB model. It's seen in a prior video https://deturl.com/play.php?v=Zbrd8bSK0zc
You very likely take out a loan from the bank, give the bank possession of the deed, and you pay off a bank in a few decades. You can very much pay it off in one lump sum, but few can afford it, and those that can won't do it anyway, because future money is cheaper than present money (overtime. There are huge fluctuations like in 2008).

Meanwhile, if you need a payment plan to pay off a book, you're in a very dark place and you probably should simply pirate it. But selling a book to person B in 20 years doesn't sound like "rent", despite the fact that I have heard that "media older than 10 years is fair game to pirate". 10 years in industry can be a step for an artist, not a career's worth of time like the original copyright law time period.
I'm not sure the analogy really fits. As I see it, hypothetical farmers aren't an elite class that gets rich from copying and transforming the communications and creative output of billions(?) of unknowing people.
If we get rid of unconstitutional copyrights in the US, this ges away.

Recall that according to the US Constitution, copyright can only be on on "science and the useful arts."

Alternately, we could restore a reasonable limit to the duration of copyrights, like 14 years.
facepalm.... next victim group is people making porn.
If I had an answer to that question for you, I would have responded to it. I didn't. I responded to the question you asked that I did have an answer for.
The prosecutor would argue it at trial and a jury would decide if the argument is convincing beyond a reasonable doubt.
what about actually running your own business? This totally negative take on Amway is one-sided. There was some young woman in MBA school in California and her Mom made lots of money on Amway to pay for that school, etc. Upon questioning, I believe that her Mom had two or three jobs at once, and some military service time, too.
On the article, the "side-eyed-moon" doesn't look like a side eyed moon to me. It looks like a normal smiley face.
Yes, this. If the form of a plausible answer is known it is likely to be invented. API method names, fields in structures, options to command lines, plausible inventions that have a known form.

Similarly references of any kind really that have a known form, like case law, literature, science, even URLs.
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic.

But the one two punch of losing ag jobs to corporations and then losing white collar jobs to AI is just too much.

What else is there? I can't pursue my purpose if I can't afford to eat.
Rent seeking should be a capital crime.
Again with the assumption people don't know what the conversation is about. Like I possibly don't know what ROI means. What a just total waste of comments
Isn't Amazon more of a cloud hosting (AWS) company, with some logistics + retail front end on the side?
What's even more frustrating is that they actively enable two of the most dominant eco-systems to entrench themselves even further.
https://github.com/flame/blis/

Field et al, recent winners of the James H. Wilkinson Prize for Numerical Software.

Field and Goto both collaborated with Robert van de Geijn. Lots of TACC interaction in that broader team.
Even worse, sending a friendly affectionate yellow heart -- how was I supposed to know the recipient was using [Android 4.42](https://thenextweb.com/news/pink-hairy-hart-emoji)?
If you're using GitHub or gitlab and merging through pull requests, I've found that these commits become duplicative and, given GitHub's rich comments-based collaboration UX, somewhat lossy. It is much easier/more valuable for me to view a commit off main that points to the PR that brought it in and the discussion that took place (along with the original commit in that branch) than to see the individual commit rebased into main without context.

Also, a lot of people (myself included) write really crappy commit messages that don't tell the whole story behind a change. This is another reason why falling back on the PR has been valuable for me.
The Wikipedia page also mentions that “Tubes were implanted in her ears to control her myriad purported ear infections”.
Sort of, but we were never in Schengen.

However that didn't constrain EU workers, as the 4 freedoms are distinct from, and predate Schengen.
Seems to be the best way to get rid of stale air (while conserving energy) in a country that prides itself of its tightly sealed windows.

> Asked by the tabloid BILD-Zeitung what feelings Germany awakes in her, Angela Merkel once famously replied, 'I think of well-sealed windows! No other country can make such well-sealed and nice windows [dichte und schöne Fenster].'

https://nybooks.com/articles/2013/08/15/new-german-question/
Decreases in correlation between cognitive ability and education over time
There's YAGNI and then there's Suitable for Purpose. If you display a thing like a tree, then people are going to expect to do tree-like things to it, like collapse views and reorder items. You might as well just git gud at tree operations and save yourself the hassle once and for all of chasing down edge cases every time a new feature request comes in for things that should have been natural extensions but you omitted "cuz YAGNI".
Ah yeah if you live in a big city served by public transportation, having a car becomes a luxury. I’m a suburb/rural guy so having a car is more of a necessity, but housing is cheaper and parking is free so the costs cancel out somewhat.
Incognito windows are better for Stoßlüften. Noted!
If you want an interesting perspective on how EU controls the flow of migrants try speaking with some Polish politicians.
I see your point that as an established commercial company they
apparently failed to diligently research their returns.

> somebody put a lot of thought into making sure there couldn't be one

Perhaps nobody put thought into that. Maybe they're just bad business
thinkers. But equating openness to an ideological anti-corporate bent
seems a little strong. Is it possible they saw a profitable path that
is also open?
AI could remove bottlenecks between what you want and what you get
>The voters of Britain made their choice and now they must deal with the consequences as best they can.

I get why I've seen this sort of comment for the last 7 years but I dislike the idea that Brexit was a unaminous decision when when Leave got ~52% of the vote share.

---

I don't know what else I can really say. I resent the political elite and news sector for turning what ought to have been a serious discussion into an energised hellscape that made us all belligerent arses. A ~4% vote margin felt rather middling for what was championed as a total victory and casus belli for immediately pulling us out of everything EU – and then everything after became omnishambles.

And then despite all of this, no-one had any solid unified idea on what leaving actually meant. Some folks wanted to stay in the customs union, the common market, a good contingent wanted us to leave without any deal with the EU for... Reasons? No-one really sat down and seriously discussed it, which was why it was a surprise when the prospect of leaving Euratom and losing encryped access to the Galileo Satellite System[1] eventually came up.

Now for the voters going for Boris Johnson's Conservatives in 2019? People were absolutely fed up of the years of political deadlock and dither, especially after the EU extended the Article 15 period which was promptly wasted. Johnson's pledge to get it over with was what vast swathes of the coutnry wanted to hear (alongside the opposition leader at the time being unpopular), and unfortunately that was tied to everything else his premiership brought.

... God, I haven't thought about Brexit in years.

[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-44232269
I think you’re missing parent’s point, which is about these sort of “business in a box” pitches sold to the aspirational middle class, and not some kind of statement that it’s impossible to profitably invest money.
> any other ideas?

Anything medical. There was some talk of Amazon getting into (legal) drug supply, which could go very poorly.
Unless I'm specifically looking for cheap Chinese crap where quality doesn't really matter (e.g., clothes hangers), Amazon's main use to me is to price-match at brick-and-mortar stores if the online price is miraculously lower than in physical retail.

Prime shipping hasn't been worth it for years, and Amazon often has higher prices than at other retailers or direct from the manufacturer. Their business model is just extracting dollars from people who have been conditioned to default to Amazon as their first choice for shopping.
so I just checked up on this and it's not exactly true. it may be built in china, but it's a joint design, built on the CMF platform like all dacias
The solution to something that has a lot of problems is not going to the opposite extreme.
Maybe getting too off topic for the thread, but it feels like equating machine and human output reaches a level of nihilism even I shudder at. I think (hope) there is intrinsic value in something being made by a human being even if a machine could do comparable work 100x faster.
Exactly. What happens if "banana" gets deleted from the database, but not "banana.eat"?
If you've already won the election, who cares about giving back the money?
Yes, heated pavements outside the shops, wind turbines on the hills, hydro, gravel roads and the sovereign wealth fund saving the money from oil for the future (check out https://www.nbim.no/, it's about 10Nok to the dollar).
The difference from the EU referendum is that there's a presidential election every 4 years and 2-term limit.
Bro if you have time to do this you have too many developers.
It refers to Einstein's original formulation of GR, without the later quantum theories.
As the American empire continues to decline as the British Empire has done, there will be increasing pressure to team up. I would go so far to say that Prince Harry in California is British Royalty establishing a new outpost in rising world power California (now the 5th largest economy by GDP, recently surpassing the UK)
Karmakaze is very apt ;) — taking the quote, which is a link, and extracting it to a comment with the link "for reference", but really it's to harvest karma from people who didn't read the article
B2B identity infrastructure written in Go
> Why you ever feel like you need to have someone else locked in a cage is beyond me

Uh, maybe if they murder people?
Frankly I haven't even thought about linking. I am a very light user. Though since markdown supports links and both editors support markdown, there might be a way. I literally just write notes then find them mostly by search even though I do have a basic directory structure and sensible file names.
How is audio interface driver/console support on Linux? Would something like UA Apollo work out of the box?
It’s usable for internal content, maybe even a small public blog where you sprinkle in some generated pictures instead of stock photos. Nobody will care if your school project contains a Mario holding a Coca Cola.

It’s once you start monetizing and publishing on bigger scale, without appropriating, it gets interesting.
What people are saying in this comment section is that you're probably going to need it. You might not need it now, but the PM of today is a short-sighted person and the future always gets here.
I noticed "Reacher (TV Series)" showed up. I guess we finally have a way to figure out what people are watching....
...gpt? Or ... why would you summarize an adjacent thread? Am I missing a joke?
Check out NewPipe. It sorts all your subs by date, lets you make your own play lists, and can also download.
OpenAI Watch – Use GPT-4 to draw a unicorn every hour and tracks the results
Less politicians to keep track off? We can just keep an eye on the UK ones and not worry about the Brussels lot?
there are some decisions that should be kept away from the hands of scientifically illiterate politicians.
It could be argued that the "deep state" in the U.S. and the U.K. are a closely knit team.
Well, it can use some rework.
Nice summary of the cottage industry surrounding gameboy and other handhelds
That's not what I'm saying. Two points:

1. Obviously some people with zero unique insight or skill in a business will make out big (i.e. "beat the market"), just like some people will win the lottery. But drastically increasing your risk/volatility and then saying "some people beat the market average!" is not actually a counterpoint to EMH, which primarily says something about risk-adjusted returns.

2. More importantly, though, if you do have some special insight into why a private business may outcompete its competitors, by all means, go for it. But TFA is basically highlighting that the vast majority of these people had no special skills in business, marketing, etc. beyond "I like fitness and once took one of their classes!" If you're in that boat, on average, you're better putting that money in the stock market. If you're a gambler and think you can, literally, beat the odds with nothing but luck, again, go for it, but I'm not going to have sympathy for you if you decided to, essentially, put your life savings on double-0.
> SBF has claimed

I put little weight on the words of a convicted fraudster who is in jail awaiting sentencing.
> Imagine a scenario where Photoshop would scan images you uploaded for copyright material and then refuse to work if it determined image contained any copyrighted material or characters

Photoshop does this already, but only if it detects that you're trying to print/create counterfeit money:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation
What Is WebAssembly: Taking a Look Under the Hood [video]
Do things that don't scale. Manually curate the good content somehow and find a way to profit from it. If curating legit content can somehow be more profitable than spamming low-quality content, then everyone will start curating and sharing the good content.
Yeah, I have to imagine an expression of disbelief here.

No EU country has control over immigration or trade. EU citizens can move anywhere they want in europe, EU companies can trade anywhere they want in europe. That's the point.

If I were the only person of a certain view, and being told something so absurd by a group of people, in earnest, my face would drop too.
Oh come on. Copyright is a fairly ancient concept that benefits normal people as much as it benefits big corporations. Most book authors, songwriters, and so on aren't fat cats, and they would be harmed if we had zero protections for the duplication of their work. They'd need to depend on state sponsorship or charitable private patronage, both of which are problematic for obvious reasons and limit the range of artistic expression more than the market does.

Instead, we came up with a system where you can actually derive fairly steady revenue by creating new works and sharing them with the world. And critically, I think you misinterpret it as calling dibs on shared culture or on stories. Copyright is usually interpreted fairly narrowly, and doesn't prevent you from creating inspired works, or retelling the same story in your own words.

Generative AI is a problem largely because it destroys these revenue streams for millions of people. Yeah, it will be litigated by wealthy corporations with top-notch lawyers, for self-interested reasons. But if we end up with a framework that maintains financial incentives to artistic expression, it's probably a good thing.
We got it all wrong
This tired idiocy of Russia shelling a reactor that is under their control again?
AI Trends for 2024
>>So again, you're telling me that this guy stole money from regular people and then used it to support a candidate that ultimately won the election? How is that not the single biggest aspect of this story and a daily headline for the last two years?

Because there's no reason to believe that money particularly did anything to sway the election or to buy him influence afterwards.

The only reason anyone cares is because a bunch of jackasses were like "he donated to the DEMS! he'll NEVER see the INSIDE OF A COURT ROOM!" and then when he absolutely did in fact get charged those same jackasses started trying to save face by just repeating the first sentence even louder.
Typically these types of single word embedding visualizations work much better with non contextualized models such as the more traditional gensim or w2v approaches, as contextual encoder-based embedding models like BERT don't 'bake in' as much to the token (word) itself, and rather rely on its context to define it.
Also, often PCA for contextual models like BERT end up with $PC_0$ aligned with the length of the document.
Amazon's Silent Sacking
Then add a sort column just like any other implementation. Even the example given by the article uses it.
> “What is required is that the author was able to express their creative abilities in the production of the work by making free and creative choices so as to stamp the work created with their personal touch”.

If I read this right, if I crank Instagram filters to 11 then it can be considered as enoigh free and creative choices?

What if I only up them to 1?
This will change as the historically WASP English speaking countries become more integrated
Yep, been thinking on that paper as well:

Traveling words. There's code!
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07315

https://github.com/santiag0m/traveling-words
My only experience with MSX has been the Yamaha CX5 M2 I bought used in the mid 80s to be used as synthesizer. Thanks to its internal synthesizer chipset, it had similar functionality to the poor man's DX7s of that time, that is, the DX9 and later the DX21, but being able to edit patches on a monitor rather than on a small character display was extremely useful. I found it at a significant lower price than a full keyboard and used it for some years with my Amiga as a sequencer and a couple other keyboards. Was a pretty little machine which sounded good, but was also pretty much single purpose as there was not much other software to use it with.
> Because there's no reason to believe that money did anything to sway the election or to buy him influence afterwards.

What proof do you have of this statement? If donating so much money that it places you "among the nation’s top political donors," yet it has no effect on the election, why does anyone donate money at all?
Yep.

Most of those high earning jobs are in the city and suburban areas, which makes car ownership a luxury.

Though, even in rural areas car ownership costs have become heavily unaffordable, now that average rent prices nationally are around $1400/mo compared to $700/mo a decade ago [0], while median salary in 2023 is at $4,000/mo (pre-tax)

[0] - https://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/data/histtab11.xlsx
It seems like this article makes a basic copyright mistake. I don't see any evidence that these are " reproductions" of source material like since no source image is linked to compare.

Instead, these are derivative works. We already have a flourishing culter of derivitave works, such as fan art that exist in various shades of legal greyness.

Some derivative works are fair use, some are not.

The position of the Author here seems to be that generative AI should not be capable of creating any derivitave works, or should only be able to do so it it can accurately identify which are fair use and which aren't (which seems like an impossibly tall bar.) This stance seem like a giant attack on fair use that significantly expands the power of copyright.

To me, the takeaway from this is different. This makes clear that there is currently a risk when using AI generated art that you could end up unintentionally creating and publishing a derivative work unintentionally and thus without evaluating if that work constitues fair use.
Nanotechnology approaches for creating biodeterioration-resistant wood
Don't allow a vote between "remain" (which was pretty clear what it meant), and an unspecified "leave" (which everyone could interpret according to their own wishes). That is, if I didn't want to remain, did I want a hard exit? A Switzerland-like situation? Something else? Voting "leave" didn't mean that I would get what I wanted.
No longer, as of when? I was working on this exact problem two days ago, using an old Lenovo M7 for a magic mirror project for a gift. I went through every relevant SO article and gave up without getting it to show up for adb, so it's odd to see this declared a solved problem.
> Why would you convert package from other distro, if another distro has it then it most certainly exists in the AUR, never once had to touch another distro's packaging.

A lot of software packages I've been using lately don't exist in the AUR. My tastes might be more niche than yours, I don't know.

> Why would you use 4 package managers to do 1 thing ?

Because all the software I'm trying to install has documentation like "install with pacman" or "install with pamac" or "install with yay" or "install from source" or "install from AUR" or... I think you get where this is going.

> Your experience sounds weird. Reading it remind me of people who come from programming paradigm X try paradigm Y and only use methods from X only to conclude that Y sucks.

Reading your rebuttal to my experience reminds me of people who answer questions on Stackoverflow like, "why would you do it this way? Your question isn't valid, your question _should have been_..." That is to say, rather than attempt to understand where I'm coming from, you thought to overwrite my experience with your own, as if yours is the truer experience to be had. My time using Arch and Arch-variant distros led me to having a seemingly fragmented experience over where to find software. That's got nothing to do with X being better than Y, it has more to do with X being mostly one or two overall places to find software, and Y being fragmented between 4-5 + conversions between apt/yum packages and PKGBUILD scripts. I'm not saying Y is inherently worse, I'm saying it's a fragmented and confusing user experience, in my humble opinion. My main dev machine still runs Manjaro because I've come to enjoy its opinionated handling of Arch, though if I were to re-image that computer I'd probably go back to either Fedora or Ubuntu.

> but I personally had much less headaches with it than I had with Ubuntu,fedora,debian, and CentOS.

Personally, I'm fine with using Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, or even Arch. I'm not saying any one of them are bad or worse than the other. I'm just saying that, to me, Arch came with some additional challenges that I don't experience from other distros, mostly revolving around how software packages are found and installed.
This reply is so incredibly out of touch with reality. Copyright law is very clear. If anything the "corporate narrative" here is that "AI" is somehow something new and different and these laws don't apply. Which is nonsense.
Thanks! Your comment compelled me to look up olivine and then feldspar to check their formulas. Becoming much more aware of the makeup of minerals is on my list of things to do.
> Specifically, Dash does not support common Bashisms.

More importantly, Bash should not support Bashims when called as /bin/sh (either).

If you want to use Bashisms just invoke Bash.