skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Very far from hostile. I have this toothbrush and the only thing it does is beep ONCE, when it thinks the head is done.
After that I will only show the "please change" indicator, but will still brush just fine.

I was actually shocked by how user friendly the whole experience is. It never prevented me from doing anything "not recommended", it'll warn me, sure.
But then go right back to accepting my imput.
Akschully, these are not mutually exclusive.
Is the idea that Steve Jobs never strong armed anyone?
Yes!! Glad people are thinking about this. We just added Cache Projects which will be launching soon, it should allow this style of public cache sharing.

The intent with Buildless is to release a free-first toolchain that helps with build caching in earnest and makes the whole problem much less error prone. Then the Cloud stuff on top is for groups who need more gas. Cloudflare is generously supporting our upcoming free tier.
Delphi and Lazarus are a continuation of the beloved gui-first idiom where you are greeted by an IDE capable of running code at design-time. That means you can add an sql connection component, create a query, connect it to a data source, connect the data source to a grid and fill it right there while designing your form to see how the result will look like when you run it.

The second reason to use it is: it builds for many targets and runs without garbage collection.

Lazarus needs to recompile and restart itself in order to use packages, but other than that, it's pretty stable and fast. VSCode can be used to edit Pascal code, but it is pretty irrelevant.
I think it must be using the browser native control? The date picker was surprisingly great on iOS. Color picker, too.
The difference is that Sam Altman doesn’t seem to be an ideas man like Steve Jobs was.

Both have been characterized as being manipulative liars though.
That might have been earlier than me, but I can see that
From where are they obtaining gas for these plants?
Speaking as an American, yes, it is most definitely "us vs. them".

China is a geopolitical enemy ruled by a communist dictatorship that wants to diminish America's power, standing, and influence in the world to advance their own. American power and the mere threat of bringing it to bear on our adversaries is what enabled the past three decades of peace, prosperity and progress throughout the world, and China is actively working to undermine and diminish it in favor of their own.

Asking for some kind of balance or symmetry here is like saying it's unfair that fighter jets drop bombs on the enemy and not their own side. Yes, that's the whole point. We win, they lose.
Street vendors with roasted chestnuts are common all over Europe, especially at Christmas markets
That to me seems like the wrong way to think about it. Of course most invasive species would come from Asia, because there was already free-flowing contact between North and South America, and there was already hundreds of years of contact between Europe and the Americas. East Asia was the place that was isolated from the Americas for the longest period of time.

I think a more interesting question is what kinds of organisms are treated as highly problematic invasive species in Asia from the Americas. That is, shouldn't we expect Asian species to be susceptible to novel American pathogens?

For example, it's famously known that diseases like small pox wiped out many Native American populations because they had no previous exposure to the disease. Perhaps less known is that it's widely hypothesized that a virulent strain of syphilis wrecked havoc in Europe after being brought back by sailors fro the Americas.
You keep bringing up mob justice...please cite some examples where an LLC was p
the victim of "vigilantism."

Why would a single individual not want to sue on their own? Who is organizing such mobs and why are they mobbing together?

By saying "why else would they want it" makes me believe you are going entirely on assumption, with zero facts to back it up. There are many acceptable explanations for why someone would want the information.
Molten iron batteries will come sooner than hydrogen anything
It wasn't a dumb idea. It was the most rational choice to use Gas. But rationality didn't work with a madman in the Kremlin.
> As the amount of data tends to 0 (idk why the quote is using 1)

The smallest amount of samples you can use is 1, isn't it? If you have 0 samples then you do nothing because you have no data. Is there a way to have half a sample?

> if course your belief tends to whatever your belief was before you saw any data

Your beliefs should tend to that, sure, but if you're trying to produce an actual number for sharing then your beliefs shouldn't be a huge factor, and an uninformative prior being a huge factor is also bad.

For numbers that leave my head/notebook, I'd rather keep the new evidence by itself and say it's weak.
> Due to freedom of speech being a core value of democracy

Freedom of speech != freedom to operate a company or platform.
The impulse to chop up life into neat and rounded boxes is one of the most annoying and pernicious. Also the jarring rationalistic condescension towards millennia of evolving norms of time keeping. If only this guy was in charge of our lives, how neat and rational everything would be!
Also enlightened (and thus rasterman) had a reputation of non trivial optimizations and low memory footprint which was critical for early smartphones.
His values are completely aligned with the ruling class.

Billionaires need on the ground types like him to actually do stuff.

It’s hard to find people who are young and ambitious and effective, and yet fundamentally and ruthlessly aligned with corporate hegemony.

And I suspect he must be spectacularly good at flattery.
A Gang of Retirees Pulled Off the Biggest Jewel Heist in British History (2016)
After reading more articles about Sam it seems he is a genius in the game of power. Am I right? He is at the center of the stage and many powerful people and organizations trust on him beyond the "anecdotes". He will gain more power while he is an amplifier of capital and business opportunities. For an investor point of view he is a business ace and you just need to be careful about partnering with him because he will always be pursuing new opportunities, even ones that eat part of the company you invested in.
Where do you get the impression there was firmware reversal involved? All I see is sniffing of the RF and the observation it’s all plaintext.
In Bazel’s case and other cases, build cache objects are held in CAS and then referenced from other keys. I believe BuildXL from Microsoft also works this way.

Of course one other advantage to build caches is they are verifiable: the intent is to produce the exact same output as a normal call, and that’s easily checked on the client side.

No question that build caching poses inherent supply chain risks though and that’s part of what we want to solve. I think people are hesitant to trust build caching for good reason until there are safer mechanisms and better cryptographic patterns applied.
WATCHING Shakespeare is what unlocked his work for me. Reading his works is naturally entertaining and insightful, but it is like reading a Hollywood script vs. watching the movie.

I kind of feel like this is a RUSH or Grateful Dead conversation too, "oh man, you've never experienced it until you've seen it live" kinda vibe.

TY for posting!
Liability insurance seems fine -- if the systems and installers are safe, underwriting it will be cheap. What seems to be harder is finding an insurer that will cover you.

You can even tie this back to hurricane season if you wish (since you brought it up)-- given the high winds can cause downed power lines, even when a storm has been downgraded below hurricane, you really don't want energized lines from solar while repairs are ongoing. And given Florida's hurricane frequency outlier status in the US, they may want more rather than less of it. One way to keep people honest about this is liablity insurance. Now it's your job to keep it repaired and the insurer's job to inspect it, since they're on the hook. And if someone is injured as a result of your culpability, neither they nor you are screwed.

But sure, the energy company probably isn't happy about solar subsidies either.
I'd seen that https://www.graalvm.org/latest/security-guide/polyglot-sandb... is JavaScript-only at this point, I guess it must build on https://www.graalvm.org/latest/reference-manual/embed-langua... and one could roll their own for any language?

Is there a good example, doc, or is it even a thing, to use GraalVM Isolates to defend against Java supply chain attacks, nevermind other languages? I guess it might be possible, going by a comment on another thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38278131 but require careful construction of anything you'd want to have only the capabilities you pass to it?

(Naive questions, apologies, I should really learn by trying it out instead!)
The outrage is mostly focused on the fact that he doesn’t seem to tell the truth.
does it jmap?
Look up how much CO2 is emitted in producing 1kg of steel. And to further drive the point. This is just CO2. Consider pollution, by-products and water use for a more complete picture. Reuse is better in every sense
You can divide year into halves, thirds and quarters. You do not have to negotiate boundaries every time.
Those are a different type of Asian / Chinese chestnut. Smaller, less flavorful etc etc.
Not with the lightning network. It's anonymous.
the number of red flags thrown would be excessive. Who hasn't purposely crashed their plane in a flight simulator just to see what happens.
Thee and Thou are still used in Northern England (Yorkshire and Lancashire). Although probably only by older people and often spoken as Thi and Tha.
Yeah it's hard for a lot of programmers to context switch back to when a megabyte a HUGE amount of memory (or even 640kB). I think everyone should play around on arduino uno or even smaller memory cpus to get some perspective. You didn't have gigabytes of rams to analyze all corner cases, data races, etc. during compilations.
Reminds me of a favorite quote:

“The best thing for being sad," replied Merlin, beginning to puff and blow, "is to learn something. That's the only thing that never fails. ... There is only one thing for it then — to learn. Learn why the world wags and what wags it. That is the only thing which the mind can never exhaust, never alienate, never be tortured by, never fear or distrust, and never dream of regretting. Learning is the only thing for you. Look what a lot of things there are to learn.”

― T.H. White, The Once and Future King
This is nonsense. In war, is it hypocritical to bomb the enemy but not your own side? Of course not. Propaganda is a weapon, you deploy weapons against your enemies and you protect your own people from your enemy's weapons.

Foreign adversaries do not have free speech rights in the United States.
> an endless environmental review process.

Considering what mining tends to do to the surrounding environment, I say good for California.
It’s only a remote cache and that’s deliberate. We see it as much safer to only offer a cache that the user can control and use however they want

We would see taking over execution of your build as much more dangerous.

No question though that build caching in shared form, in SaaS form, needs extra special attention paid to security. Our product doesn’t introspect cache blobs and in fact doesn’t really want to. Once we figure out how to make the crypto work, we shouldn’t be able to see any of that data at all.

Access can be made public for reads (OSS) but is always identified for writes.
I hope it does not get banned. Even if they try to ban it, they have to then contend with all the people building their careers on it/consider it a essential part of their lives. Might be enough to motivate Millenials/Gen Z to cone out to the ballot box and remove anyone who was responsible. (This is probably why they havent banned it yet)

While I don't use TikTok, its been fascinating watching the US lose its marbles over the idea that there is an avenue for mass dissemination of ideas that they cannot control. It really became real when the Pro-Palestine content translated into mass protests all across the west. Israel really dug themselves into a hole and I sometimes wonder, if this trend continues, what are they going to do once the Boomers die and down the road we get a Gen-Z president?

Sure you have state sponsored channels like RT that try to provide alternative views but they dont have anywhere near the eyeballs TikTok gets and they can be easily discredited.

The last time the US had a major competitor was in the 80s. Finally someone has come along that is challenging the US on many levels, not just social media apps.

I had always wished Europe to get their act together and serve as a democratic counter balance to the US but these days they are not even in the conversation. But at least China is trying despite the fact that they are less than savory.

We will continue to have access to American social media apps pushing their nonsense and acting like they provide freedom while quietly suppressing content they don't like (ex. anti-Israel). Meta/Youtube/X platforms are not going away. I love the fact that the mass market has some choice now.
TL;DR: Still unclear what either example has to do with the claims.

[1] Majorana particle

A. Zenodo link: the authors use 'manipulating' to mean 'presentation of data', you are using it to mean 'made up data to unimaginably hype [the idea] quantum computing [applications will be ready in the short term] in order to get short-listed for a Nobel'.

B. The only thing tying this to QC is anything you've said is the idea MS would be excited by the paper. That's it. Nothing else tying it to QC or QC applications or hype.

C. If they purposefully manipulated the experiment to falsify data, they must be some of the stupidest people on earth, you don't get a Nobel without reproduction. Are you sure they did? No one else seems to be claiming any of that.

[2] Google wormhole

A. Source: "Last fall, a team of physicists announced that they had teleported a qubit through a holographic wormhole in a quantum computer. Now another group suggests that’s not quite what happened."

B. Claim: 'made up data to unimaginably hype [the idea] quantum computing [applications will be ready in the short term] in order to get short-listed for a Nobel'

C. QED: claim unrelated to source

[3] Follow up question from me

Are you comfortable making up people, claims about them and their actions, without sourcing?

If so, I find that interesting, because you seem very, very, very, dedicated to the idea that researchers who ever make a mistake are doing it intentionally for attention and rewards. That's not how research works. We applaud retractions.
I don’t disagree with the sentiment but the tools aren’t the problem, it’s the delivery. A puzzle can might be toxic if it’s a test, but constructive as a gimmick used to explore communication. Likewise for coding exercises.

It’s all pretty easy if respect for the human is genuine, and destructive for all when faked.
I don't know a lot about Sam Altman's history, but I do know that there is a lot of misattribution in tech circles away from the doers and toward the managers.
Has he had significant tangible results, or has he managed people who have had those tangible results?

This sort of misattribution seems to show up when you have individuals with sociopathic tendencies running firms that do cool things: Elon Musk is the king of this. The man has not, on his own, had any sort of good results on the world - Tesla and SpaceX seem to do a lot better when he steps away from them - but he has found ways to get himself into a position to take credit from the engineers who do. Hyperloops and Twitter are the results of Elon Musk's original work. That's not to say that the management is necessarily negative: someone needs to fund the work of the good engineers.
The potato blight of the Irish famine came from south America, and the phylloxera that destroyed the french wine at the beginning of the 20th century came from north America.
IA is wasting their donors money fighting a case they know they will lose because they had to have known from the beginning that their book system was completely unsupported by law or precedent.

I would stop donating until leadership changes, they are risking the ire of courts and prosecutors if they continue. Their archive could be seized or ordered to stop entirely.

For an org to legitimately consider this means it's leadership is controlled by unreasonable people that no longer are upholding their mission. They have been told by their legal that this won't work, and are pursuing it anyways.
That's basically what all the crypto incubators consist of.
In a lot of parts of the countryside that I love, the ash trees have completely obscured all the best views over the past 30 years. It feels awful to say but I can’t wait for ash-die-back to wipe out this generation. We’ll be glad for the timber to use as fuel too, of course.
In most cases I’ve never actually run into this as an issue. For example the 3DS only officially supports SDHC cards so up to 32GB of data but if you format a larger card as FAT32 it works perfectly fine.
It’s not.

This nonsense was created as fodder for incompetent and dishonest politicians.

You’ll now hear the least competent ones exclaim things like “a rutgers study says China bad, China spy, China control of social media not same as US government control of social media ugg ugg fire fire”.
The OP does mention Austal as one of a few languages putting their own twist on Rust learnings, though the most interesting thing to me about Austral is indeed https://borretti.me/article/how-capabilities-work-austral rather than simply memory safety (though that's essential too).
Asia is not the only continent that's not connected by land with America.
Interesting, and are those used as the informal you? Or in reference to singular?
Let the terminal bells ring out
(Also, speaking as a Bazel user now, the Remote Execution APIs have always been a bit brittle and hard to setup, use, and maintain; certainly harder than just setting a cache endpoint.

I’ve found that remote execution ends up returning much less benefit than remote caching, but that’s just me and it’s entirely possible I Did It Wrong the whole time)
"You" is the formal version. But as the answers explain, English did also have the informal version.
This is a great, interesting example. From the Wikipedia page on Phylloxera:

> In France alone, total wine production fell from 84.5 million hectolitres in 1875 to only 23.4 million hectolitres in 1889. Some estimates hold that between two-thirds and nine-tenths of all European vineyards were destroyed.
Certainly mistakes were made, but please recall that it is primarily market forces which led us to the German gas dependence. Russian gas was just cheaper than American and Qatari gas.
They recently released a new YouTube stats website and they use Meilisearch in the frontend.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38681328
This list is things i generally felt were true before hand but nice to see it be confirmed.

(sans the comment about real estate).
It’s worth noting the Microsoft Services Agreement is interpreted in Washington which has rules about noncompetition covenants, it seems sketchy to use licenses and service terms to restrict competition from others just because they’re not employees (non-employees don’t even have the rejected justification of employment which seemingly doesn’t validate noncompetition covenants in WA except under really specific conditions and high pay)

Seems like a big commercial company which uses noncommercial licenses to restrict trade is just writing a different kind of noncompetition covenant and it ought not be allowed or enforceable. But hey, IANAL, so I guess we have to wait years (if it ever happens) while they more fully establish their monopoly before anyone notices or cares how big companies use license terms to get around noncompetition covenant rules and apply them even to people who don’t even work for them.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.62

Let’s just say I canceled my Microsoft GitHub Copilot Subscription over 14.q.iii fine print one liner in

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/servicesagreement
Mining is actually one of the most privilleged land usages. The Mining Law of 1872 still governs and positions mining as the "highest" possible use of a land. This actually makes fighting the opening of a new mine one of the most challenging fights activists and indigenous people often undertake
I had never until just now considered the possibility that “you” might be the thorn misprint of “thou”, just like how in “ye olde shoppe” was (according to legend) pronounced “the old shop” because Y got used in printing presses as a stand-in for the thorn “Þ” character they didn’t have, that looks kinda-sorta like a Y.

Seems like the answers suggest I’m just imagining something that didn’t happen, but it was a fun thought.
This idea was actually in the launch keynote! Along with a bunch of other cool ideas that never shipped.

Maybe someday someone will explain what went wrong.

My guess is that competitors were quicker to market than they expected, and had unique advantages (Microsoft owns windows and Xbox, nvidia owns … nvidia).
They affect performance, forcing the dev to insure they aren't doing unsafe/ill-defined things which is almost impossible on huge code bases in c/c++
Off the top of my head, Marmokrebs, the north american crayfish capable of asexual reproduction, is invasive in China, Taiwan, and Japan, although more prevalent in Europe.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbled_crayfish
Yes, a good book makes all the difference to me. Particularly around bedtime - I'm very much a night owl and usually struggle to get to bed on time but the prospect of reading a bit of a good book before going to sleep is good motivation.
I used this book for studying for 3 semesters of university.
I took Russian translation of 7 edition (second for English version) from uni's library.
glad to hear it's just a freaky coincidence!
"If we tell them to, do you really think they will brush their tongues?"

https://youtu.be/ltZrfrmb7Ws
Continuous is still better because you can react to changing state at every moment rather than being stuck with a response for a whole second.

I believe the threshold ratio is somewhere around e.

You might find MIT’s 6.302 lectures enlightening.
Yes, it was the programming language I was taught in school. So there is some nostalgia at play, for me at least.
Right but it’s a survey, so the people who don’t care don’t respond to the survey. If over samples people who are worried about crime.
Oh wait is that the reason I can never find chestnuts here in Canada in grocery stores?
Depends a lot on the niche. A lot of people are just readers in tech blogs, and only comment if you made a mistake. But if you have a personal blog, the most random opinion can get dozen of comments even with a fraction of the readers.
Also this other bit was news to me:

"Graham said it was his wife’s doing. “If anyone ‘fired’ Sam, it was Jessica, not me,” he said. “But it would be wrong to use the word ‘fired’ because he agreed immediately.” "
Exactly — just like Git, everything is ultimately identified with a key which can tie back to a stable identity thru OIDC or similar mechanisms. At least that’s how we did it.
Instead of the simple Ruby script, I think GoAccess is better. It's a simple command line tool available in nearly all package managers. You can simply pipe your logs to it and get an ncurses based summary of the site.

zcat /var/log/nginx/access.log* | goaccess
When a .o is stored in the cache it is associated with the hash of the .c file
A gift for Christmas, MicroVM manager beta is live