skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They have content that LLMs want to use in training - millions of historical articles.
>Just likes how humans compress the information we read.

Humans don’t have the scale machines have and moreover humans aren’t sevices, that argument doesn’t fly.

I really think NYTs data isn’t that important and nor crucial, LLMs could’ve just elided it. However, it’s more about training on copyrighted data in general which is kind of crucial for OpenAi, they trained their LLMs indiscriminately on copyrighted content without any plan to share any profits.
Maybe the big webmail providers are relying more on machine learning for filtering spam instead of blocking IP ranges these days.
Legal challenges to AI traffic fine system
They may take issue. They can't take complete ownership over a number though
What I mean is that (assuming the sbox values are actually random) you couldn't memorize it short of intensive study and practice of memory techniques. If the "sbox" is in reality some easily memorizable function then maybe, but even then, how many people can remember long hex values from their old jobs?
I am fairly sure I mean RFC 3339.

There is no need to buy a copy of ISO 8601, particularly as I prefer the more specific date formats defined in RFC 3339.
Recap and Learn gen AI with curated list of open-source resources
Well first you need to obviously build an OR package, part of your suite of logical operator packages, all depending on your battle-tested, high performance XOR package.
More info here on his Website

https://paglen.studio/37C3/

Use 37C3 as the enrolment code to play the C3 version of the game. You can only collect prizes in person on Saturday
Nope they don't. Since I subscribed to which (the UK equivalent of CR) my appliances have been much better quality for not much more cost. That being said, ask me again in a decade.
It took me way too long to realize this was satire. It was a stressful read up until that point.
I agree, but nothing worth having is free. NYT and other news outlets have to ultimately pay reporters to go out into the world and do the work. The reporters are not priests, and the NYT is not a church that lives off donations and tax exemptions. They need money to operate, and you may disagree with how they try to collect that money (paywall) but that doesn't solve their funding problem.

How would you pay for news otherwise?
The Soviets were supporters initially as well. They started the second world war together with Germany by attacking Poland.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Poland
While nuclear plants do pair well with storage (many pumped hydro storage stations were built to pair with nuclear plants), the idea that they cannot load follow is a myth. It is simply more economical for them to run at full load since fuel cost is a very small portion of nuclear operating expenses.

https://imgur.com/a/tB3x48U
It is am ethical grey area, but if the paywall applied to all user agents, which would make it similar to say buying a Kindle book, then you might see that as pirating, whereas if you use an archive service that was served the HTTP response and cached it, then you are using a proxy UA.

If the news/magazine doesn't want this they can simple serve a cut down or zero length article to all non-paying viewers! But they want that SEO, and they want that marketing.
I replace a class of search engine queries with chatgpt questions. I do this in particular when I dive into a new knowledge topic where I am a complete noob. That is where chatgpt shines for me right know, helping you navigate unknown territories.
Fair enough, comparisons are dangerously close to arithmetic and we can't have any of that.
Inheritance is usually not the solution; composition and delegation is. Unfortunately, the current landscape of popular languages have equated "object programming == inheritance" in people's minds. The fact that these languages make inheritance easy but provide no syntactical or semantic support for composition and delegating to inner objects compounds this problem.

> there could be an element inheriting low-level behavior (HTTP/API call, etc) from a button and a high-level behavior (style/presentation, etc) from a visual class.

This becomes very messy very quickly, and you would need to clearly separate the concerns to make them non-expressible on either side. CSS and JS make this possible by being two different languages, one Turing-incomplete (in usual scenarios).
How was this upvoted so much? This is blogspam. Read Microsoft's documentation instead: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-...
But of course WebAssembly is the future. So we should reimplement it in WASM.
I think you're confused. If something is unlicensed, it means you don't have a license, and so you cannot use it.
You kind of proved GP's point by misspelling both names.
They are Xiaomi and Huawei.
The fact that you misspelled them isn't surprising, as both have "foreign" spellings compared with the Japanese brands like Toyota, Honda, Nissan.
X is rarely used in English, and they have paired and less common vowel pairs.
Both are also not pronounced phonetically, which is also true of the the Japanese brands but the approximation is arguably closer for them.
Certainly for some of the brands
sounding like Amazon 3rd-party re-resellers is a big mark against them.
I wonder how the plethora of no name brands will hold on long term. Car is not a phone. You can't just make 100k units and forget that product even existed after End of Production. People will want maintenance, diagnostic, software support. People will want parts after few years.

Even big boys like Hyundai have problems with parts as we saw here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38783355
Your previous employer never bought AutoCAD, they licenced its use, paying a subscription. When you start working for them that licence was no longer available to you. So you would be unable to subsequently use it.
Like I said in another comment it is simpler than that. They just serve the login page/payment page to all HTTP requests. If they do that then the submission itself likely get's flagged as there is no workaround (just like if I submit my blog with a banner saying "hey you pay me $1 to read my cool post")
VS code is most importantly a window manager, actually three window managers - sidebar, panels and editor groups.
It's very difficult to get traction here until the project is launched (or at least you have a bunch of screenshots to show).
Not everything is news that appears in a newspaper. There are opinion pieces, etc.
Hah. That's a third type of magical thinking (unfortunately).
Indeed there are media that are hard paywalled, e.g., the information. However these are prohibited on HN, which possibly create additional bias towards non-hard-paywalled publications
Yes to what?
"Our results point to a gap between expected and realized costs stemming from low resilience to time- and site-dependent construction conditions."

Couldn't that be paraphrased to "last minute changes"?
Groundbreaking!
2023, in 7 Minutes [video]
ah yes! i will do this in the next version. someone recomended leaving some of the xss elements like the image and video function with the old school chat vibes but I'm not sure what to do lmaooo
> Seems weird to argue that you have to speak up if you don’t want something done to you or else you consent to everything.

If you don't want people to get at your land, setting up even a small fence creates an explicit indication of limitations. Just like the record in robots.txt I mentioned earlier.

New York Times also doesn't limit article text content if you just request HTML, which is typical for automated cases. But they impose th limits imposed on users viewing the pages in browser with Javascript, CSS and everything else. So they clearly:

1. Have a way to determine the user's eligibility for reading the full article on server side.

2. Don't limit the content for typical automated cases on server side.

3. Have a way to track the activity of not logged in users, determining the eligibility for access. So it's reasonable to assume that they had records of repeated access from the same origin, but didn't impose any limitations before some time.

So there are enough reasons to think that robots are welcome to read the articles fully. I'm not talking about copyright violations here, only about the ability to receive the data.
Pull your head out of your ass.
Ask HN: Data Structure Question
I have a database of products and need to map their relationships. I’m looking for suggestions on the best approach, thanks!

Each product has multiple types of relationship to other products such as by size (100mL, 500mL, 1L etc), or by colour, or by flavour (e.g. salt & vinegar or original crisps), or simply by being the “same” product but by competing manufacturers.

If each product row contains a list of related products as a field, that could work, but wouldn’t it be better to map out the tree, graph (or whichever data structure) of all products’ relationships and when a product is queried search the data structure and return the list for that product?
Isn't this (more-or-less) what happens nowadays: When you die, with no one to inherit your assets, whatever's left is acquired by the government?
With the ways NYTimes has degraded since 2010 even if people there are working for free, they're still being overpaid. The only adequate section there is the food.
It does make a lot more sense if messaging is asynchronous, because the metaphor breaks down immediately if sending any message requires the sender to freeze until a reply comes back.
That the secret registers are in fact cache test registers, as explained at that link, is a very plausible explanation for their existence.

Nevertheless, this does not explain at all the astonishing fact that they were mapped by default in the accessible memory space, unless listed and explicitly denied in the system configuration files.

No amount of incompetence seems enough to explain such a default policy, so the supposition of an intentional backdoor still seems more likely.
Really wanted to enjoy this, but it seemed like the room size of 5 was way too small. People would pop in and out endlessly hoping for some bustle but none seemed to be able to build.

What chat I did get really recreated the 14 year old edgelords in chatrooms experience though. Lots of porn gif spamming
RDP is really great compared to other solutions like VNC or Xserver. Im really sad there is nothing similar for Linux. Anyone?
I misinterpreted your app, so here is an alternative product idea in case you want to try it in the future: Use GPT-4 to write a nice short story about the drawing.
I’m not saying they don’t invest in them but if those investments make up more than a small % of their net assets I would be surprised.
2 observations:

I couldn't figure out what my username was, I had to ask in the chat.

It's possible to embed recursive iframes, so I can see that being exploited for bad things.

Otherwise I like the idea. People in the chat were nice, but I can't help but think that soon chat rooms will be full of chatGPT bots and nobody will be any the wiser!
Towards an updated dialect atlas of British English
As a user, I'm thankful I don't need to sift through hundreds of spam emails a day to find potential false positives. Because that's what you're advocating. You'd apparently like everyone to have a terrible email experience for the sake of your own personal comfort and preference (self hosting your emails).

Besides, for something truly important, the people or organisations who need to reach me know how to do so other than via email (phone, chat, postal mail...).
You can try using cookies for repeating users authentication.
Unable legally, but I may find illegal ways. And the reason it is illegal to copy is copyright at the end. The license is only (legally) required because of copyright.
It is not at all progressive, the Iranian authorities use this surgery as a punishment for homosexual men.

See https://www.thepinknews.com/2020/02/22/iran-gay-forced-gende...:

> Shadi Amin, an Iranian-born activist, told The Sun that this homophobic Iranian regime is controlled by religious extremists who view being gay as an "illness". They believe that the only way it can be cured is by changing gender.

> "The government believes that if you are a gay man, your soul is that of a woman and you should change your body," Amin said.

> "We think this is a way [for them] to fight the existence of homosexual people because you change their body and you solve the problem.

> "The regime gives gay people two choices – to be arrested as a homosexual and risk punishment or even execution, or change your body."

> Government data shows that around 4000 gender reassignment surgeries are performed in Iran each year.

> Amin, however, claims that those numbers are actually much higher in reality.

> "They are trying to cleanse the country of homosexuals," she added.

> "They would rather carry out mass surgeries than executions because they know the world is watching them."
> should be available to all participants of that society.

Who pays?
Well, if you are serious, lets start with reasonable discussions, not with propaganda. It isn't the politics of the current government which is a disaster, it was that of the previous ones. They killed nuclear, they curbed the switch to renewables and indeed, NS1 and NS2 were clearly built by Russia to allow the war in Ukraine. It was bizarre that German politics of that time agreed to that.

By the way, the farmers don't have to pay billions, it is several hundreds of millions. And this came also only because of the stupid "Schuldenbremse", which is a great way to ruin a country. Guess who is responsible of that.

And what you say about the French reactors doesn't invalidate what I wrote. They had to be taken down longer than planned, creating shortages. On top of that the fact, that in hot years, they just cannot run them fully through the summer due to lack of cooling. As summers will get hotter, France will have to quickly come up with some solutions.

I don't want the AfD to gain any power too, but the solution against that isn't telling more lies. It is telling less lies. But too many parties think it is a recipe for success to finger-point at the greens and tell propaganda which helps the AfD. And towards those 75% you claim which don't want to vote for Nazis, well, the bad news is, they do.

The thing is, all democratic parties have to perform better. But as long they prefer petty fights instead of working on solving the problems we have, the non-democratic parties are on a rise.
Running a mail server should be something anyone can do. And while this is cool, there are so many other problems to do it. It's the price we pay of letting big tech companies control so much of the virtual infrastructure: big tech has commoditized the internet so much into a platform for consumerism that it becomes a valuable target for spam.

In my opinion, the internet would be much better if none of the big players ever entered it, including Google, Facebook, Yahoo, etc, and it would allow for many more decentralized and valuable commons like email.
Yes and no. It is true that Disney movies were not good, and it is not part of them being woke. They were just boring not interested.

On the other hand if you create a checklist movie (Strong female character - check, good gay character - check, showing white privileged character who is wrong - check) it is exceptionally difficult to create a good movie.

Therefore yes, wokeism is destroying movie industry. Political agenda makes characters unbelievable, because they are just vehicles for political agenda.

Therefore movies and not because they are include woke, but woke makes a worse movie overall. It is the effect of including it, not the act of including it.
A nice talk! Now we have also new terminology; from surveillance capitalism to psyop capitalism.

Yet, the issue is that the former still arguably works poorly at persuasion; hence, Republik.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38792095
But there is a very good reason to reinvent the wheel here: to not burn more zero-days than you have to.
Very interesting, thanks. Summarizing that thread:

- The "hash" is probably an error correcting code fed into GPU cache debug registers which will be stored in the cacheline itself, you're expected to compute the ECC because it's so low level. That is, the goal isn't to protect the DMA interface. (but this isn't 100% certain, it's just an educated guess)

- The "sbox" is similar to but not the same as a regular ECC as commonly used in hardware.

- Martin argues that the existence of such registers and the code table could have been guessed or brute forced, even though a compromise or info leak from Apple seems more likely. Or possibly even from the old PowerVR days. But if it's the NSA then who knows, maybe they are literally fuzzing hidden MMIO ranges to discover these interfaces.

- This is possible because the GPU has full DMA access without an IOMMU for performance reasons, so it's fertile ground for such exploits. Probably more will be discovered.

So that's all reassuring.
Everytime I see news about this story

it gets crazier and crazier, holy shit!
> If anyone has recommendations for further viewing/reading, please share.

For further _reading_ would be especially appreciated. I don't have the patience to watch bunch of ~hour long videos for something that could likely be better described in an article that I could read in 5-15 minutes.
I would say 9 times out of 10 it's to get around the paywall and absolutely not some higher moralistic preservation of history.

And everything is a grey area, determining the line is the existential purpose of these court cases.

We've been here before with hyperlinking, then indexing and then linking with previews and the Canadian Facebook stuff but I think this has more standing.
Don't Use VSCode [video]
Wow the idea of disguising a missle as a 300 person passenger plane is one of the most morally bankrupt things I’ve ever seen.
Bing links to the source, chatbots doesn't.
This. Microsoft, Google, et al. aren't doing anything worthy of criticism here; it's the spammers who ruin email for the rest of us who should be facing the music.
The attack payload should not be so tied to an exact installation path that you can't just install it via a different exploit chain.
> Why? Apple isnt exactly a small family business and this is quite the drastic "feature" to be left enabled by accident.

Mistakes happen, maybe it's used in the manufacturing or fab phase to test something. Maybe it's used by the GPU firmware itself to perform some operations.

Maybe it was used by some older SoCs to do something and was just never removed.

Apple may not be a small family business but silly mistakes still happen all over the place in nearly every large system.

To quote another post by macran cause I feel like it's super relevant when trying to analyse how this kind of stuff comes about.

@nicolas17 @nil Correct. The question is, how many more of these fun bypasses are left undiscovered? The GPU is a huge amount of hardware and firmware.

Computers are so incredibly complicated now days that these kinds of hardware bugs are likely sitting around elsewhere as well, they don't come around that often because the amount of effort required to find them is likely a lot, which is likely only viable for a nation state actor.
I have been building, rebuilding, optimizing several small-scale solar installations off-grid for nearly 30 years. These systems need to "just work" for guests and family, not be so finicky and fragile that people are afraid to use them.

The number one innovation that has made off-grid life more than just tolerable is low-voltage LED lighting. It's wonderful to be able to work in a well-lit space without worrying so much about battery life. All lighting is on mechanical timer switches, walking out of a room and leaving the lights on is a bad habit that's hard to break.

The next innovation to increase utility and practicality will likely be LFE (LiFePO4) batteries. In 30 years I have worn out or accidentally destroyed dozens of lead-acid batteries in various forms. They are fragile and heavy. Moving them by boat is brutal. I have high hopes that my current set of replacements will be the last ones for many years.

Electrical loads keep increasing. First lights, then radios and phones. Now laptops and a long-range WiFI link for remote work, and overnight power for CPAP machines. Next up will be DC solar powered refrigeration to displace propane. That will require more panels, more batteries but will have an immediate and long lasting benefit.

It has been a long and mostly satisfying project which has benefitted everyone around me.
This was hilarious thank you. Many lols
Posting on behalf of Bhavik, Co-Founder of OTPLess:

Will add other methods in pricing as well.

We have bulk discount for high volume companies where users have to login multiple times a day
Thank you for the feedback!

So far from users I've heard they want:

1) username visibility fix making sure all colors are visible
2) removal of xss
3) ability to see your own username (its just "you" rn)
4) dark mode

open to any and all suggestions :)
my first full stack app. its cool seeing it being used
"Most features are free, even for commercial use." surprised after your intro.
The #1 canary for me is circular dependencies. In more complex domains, a strict hierarchy of types begins to fall apart rapidly.

In my experience, a relational model is the best solution for domain modeling precisely because it can directly represent circular dependencies without any sort of weird interface hacks, one off Init() methods, etc.

A practical example of this would be something like the domain of banking. In a bank, you generally have 2 major types of entities: accounts and customers. Accounts can have many customers and customers can have many accounts. Which type should "win"? In SQL you don't have to make this decision at modeling time - it is deferred to the caller and its specific view of the world.

You can certainly emulate this in OOP, but then you are stuck doing joins between collections manually.
what about wordle or the crossword or the cooking section

https://cooking.nytimes.com/