skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So, for fun, I searched, and trust came up about never (that's a shame) compared to "attitude". And as for attitude, one suggested a raft of tests/criteria (which personally make me cringe, because I am a bit of a contrarian, and wary of being "stamped").

But trust may be really hard to estimate from the outside. I suppose that anecdotes from one's career could, but they really should come from references, not the candidate. That said, I sometimes retell tales where I acted with real trust.

These may trigger your memory.

Hiring based on personality, not skills.

https://cmoe.com/blog/hiring-personality-better-hiring-skill...

Six personality tests (ouch!)

https://cmoe.com/blog/personality-tests-develop-employees/

Why I hire for attitude, not skills.

https://www.linkedin.com/business/talent/blog/talent-strateg...
https://cmoe.com/blog/hiring-personality-better-hiring-skill...

Mark Murphy, author:

Hire for attitude

My contrarian side also found:

Want Innovation? Hire for Skills, Not Attitude

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billfischer/2012/01/25/want-inn...

References a book by Dan Schwabel, "Hiring for Attitude" as a strawman.

quote from the article:

So, here's a new mantra: For everyday work, hire for attitude, train for skills; but when big change, such as innovation, is envisioned, then hire for skills (because you need them) and figure out how to deal with the attitudes (because, all too often, they come along with the skills).

end quote

I personally struck a balance between trust, not bending the rules (much) in my favor while always lending support to teammates, and contrarianism, which brought fresh ideas to the table in a positive (and non-obnoxious) way.
Maybe, but chips already have vast, vast, quantities of physical registers in a big blob.

Assuming it wasn't a lucky guess, timing attacks are often used to find this stuff.
We can even distinguish if something that looks like it might have been a firepit actually was one by checking the induced magnetisation via the Curie temperature.
Metaverse is dead, why companies still use that as a buzzword marketing tactic, no one is using metaverse.
Also, if it’s fully client based and no backend, why do they charge per minute?
> is that Open Source has completely failed to serve the common person. For the most part, if they use us at all they do so through a proprietary software company's systems, like Apple iOS or Google Android, both of which use Open Source for infrastructure but the apps are mostly proprietary.

This most certainly wouldn't have happened if "open source realism" didn't stood against free software "utopian" idealists. I still remember the "Linux Kernel is now in most devices in the world" when Android came out. This didn't went well, didn't it?

Lastly, isn't redhat an enthusiastic supporter of open source ? The domain https://opensource.com/ is literally copyrighted and supported by redhat...
Scoping let's you define an upper and a lower boundary

So you can cut holes in the selectivity, for say, letting blog post content have its own styles. That's the biggest advantage. There's also some minor utilities it's got, like not impacting selectivity and such, but it is one of those features that will have to see widespread use to actually grow an understanding of all it's intricacies
Is there any reason the hardware on say Intel integrated GPU hardware shouldn't be able to do the same? Even outside of gaming the rise of composited desktops seems like motivation to push for low copy + low latency graphics systems.
You don't need Julia. Julia was trying to be a better python. We will have better python in form of Mojo.
did the author set up their mom's Macbook without an iCloud account and only added it once she complained about missing functionalities?
Speaking of the Alps and related regions, this was also considered a condition typical for Styrians (inhabitants of the country of Styria) in Austria.
Show HN: Startup Growth Kit 3.0
1. Reddit Marketing Kit
100+ Successfully Self Promotion posts on reddit without being banned ( Airtable Database )

2. Product Hunt Kit
Launching on Product Hunt: A Practical Guide ( Notion template )

Complete Product Hunt Checklist ( Notion Template )

50+ Best Taglines on Product Hunt ( 2023 )

3. Short Video Marketing Kit
30 Best Viral Video Hooks with Examples ( Notion Checklist )

10 Most Viral Video Hooks with Examples ( PDF )

3 Viral Video Templates ( Notion )

4. Twitter Marketing Kit
100+ Best Hand Curated Viral Tweets on Side Project and Startups

50+ Most Viral Threads Ideas Examples and Notion Template

5. Complete Social Media Content and Marketing Planner ( Notion Template )

6. 400 Places to submit your side project and startups to gain traffic

7. 700+ Hand Curated Startup and marketing Resources to grow your startup ( Notion )

Link - https://sites.google.com/view/startupgrowthkit
> the first being at the birth of modern search engines.

Why do you say that? Search engines would at least direct the viewer to the source. NYT gets 35%+ of its traffic from Google: https://www.similarweb.com/website/nytimes.com/#traffic-sour...
leads Kaspersky and myself to the only rational conclusion: that Apple cooperated with the NSA on this exploit.

Kapersky reaches no such conclusion. That's from an FSB release.
"The United States also operates a reusable robotic space plane, the Boeing-built X-37B. Similar to China's Shenlong space plane, little is known about the exact operations or capabilities of the X-37B."

No, it's more likely that China spies stole the blueprints from Boeing and China made their own version of the Boeing platform, not that the US "also operates" one. It was in the newspapers a few years back that the feds busted in the door of an old and long retired Chinese-American man, one well known within the black projects community, who had spent his career at (what is now) Boeing and arrested him for high treason after our spies in China eventually identified schematics for a military craft and traced it back to his actions a decade or so earlier at work. (That's just one example of someone who was caught!) I read today that because China captured and killed much of our spy network there about a decade ago (if they say 18, maybe it is 180, https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN18H035/) and so we are today more or less flying blind (https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/american-spie...).
What is an example? Are there any where it is dominant?
Wrong in this case. It's a straightforward common swap on these, at most needing some brackets and an intermediary on the can bus, and stronger rear springs depending on the exact swap.
There are no such things as “serving spoons” — any spoon is a serving spoon if you serve something with it.

There are no such things as “desert spoons” — any spoon is a desert spoon if you eat desert with it.

Don’t get me started on whether or not teaspoons exist.

This is such a pointless observation given the world has really come down heavily on the side of sanity, which is to say yes clearly any language can be used for scripting but “scripting languages” are those languages for which writing scripts is the primary purpose. Just like, while you can serve food with any spoon in a pinch, if you really want a spoon that is specialised for serving, a serving spoon is what you are crying out for.

If everyone understands exactly what they mean when they say “scripting language” or “statically typed” and these terms are frequently used to bootstrap understanding of other languages, are they really wrong to use those terms? This isn’t “nonsense taxonomy”, it’s using language in the normal way for the purposes of communicating with human beings, which is something most people try to do.
That’s only “rational” for kaspersky bc in their world they can’t function without having actual intelligence operatives on staff. I seriously doubt nsa needed help here
I'm speaking colloquially. I believe it covers exactly this situation.
Both of ChatGPT's is_palindrome functions have terrible performance. The algorithmic efficiency doesn't matter because the cost of iterating through each character in pure Python dwarfs everything. The first function is about 3 times slower than the second one, but only because it spends >98% of its time in the "convert to lowercase and remove non-alphanumeric characters" part (which the second function doesn't bother doing at all). If you remove that step then the first function is 28 times faster than the second in my benchmark. That's because the first function does the reversing and comparison in O(1) Python operations, which is still O(n) C operations but the C operations are orders of magnitude cheaper.

An optimal version would combine the second function's algorithmic improvement with the first function's 'leave it to C' approach:

def is_palindrome(s):
half_length = (len(s) + 1) // 2
return s[:half_length] == s[:-half_length-1:-1]

This is a bit under twice as fast as ChatGPT's first function with the cleaning removed. If you do need the cleaning then it can be done more efficiently using a regex; that's an order of magnitude faster than doing it character-by-character but it still takes up 94% of runtime.

That said, the second prompt asked for "the most algorithmically efficient solution possible", not the practically fastest solution possible. Arguably ChatGPT gave the correct answer, especially since . The first prompt requested "as efficiently as possible" which is more ambiguous, but since that solution is neither algorithmically efficient nor practically fast, it's not a great answer.

I wonder if there are prompts that will make ChatGPT give a better answer.

--------

Benchmark is here: https://gist.github.com/comex/81ff10bf095db2d86a52a148c8b11d...

This is all using CPython. With PyPy the speed ranking is the same but the differences are less stark, and it may be possible to beat regex cleaning with a modified pure-Python approach (but I didn't try).
Exactly! FOSS has been the unwitting enabler behind locking people down in giant SaaS silos.
> This is why I prefer VHDL. It's strongly typed.

I agree, and I must say I feel much "safer" when coding in VHDL than I do in Verilog, but OTOH, VHDL's strong typing sometimes cuts the other way.

I have found myself way too many times at the receiving end of VHDL's type system furiously trying to prevent me from casting something of type A to something of type B when I knew the underlying bit representation made the cast absolutely trivial.
You can find the register file relatively easily because it's a block of memory that's the same on each core but isn't cache, but it isn't a 1:1 map from architectural registers that we would recognize: the chip is designed to find an optimal allocation of slots in the register file to runtime values.
Wake me up when google drive gets e2ee.
Hi author, sorry for referring to you as a male.
What are the arguments used against iodised salt? Where would they get their iodine?
Honestly very surprised it took this long. It's been an elephant in the room for ages.
I think the exact opposite is true: as long as AI depends critically on scrupulous news media to be able to generate info about current events, it is far more important to protect the news media than the AI training models. OpenAI could survive even if it had to pay the NYT for redistributing their works. But OpenAI can't survive if no one is actually reporting news fairly accurately. And if the NYT were to go bankrupt, all smaller players would have gone under looooong before.

In some far flung future where an AI can send agents to record and interpret events, and process news feeds and others to extract and corroborate information, this would greatly change. But probably in that world the OpenAI of those times wouldn't really bother training on NYT data at all.
The longest flight I took was 21hrs, spent most of it sleeping and watching movies.
Politicians around the world are pushing for mass adoption of what is basically a luxury good, not a substitute for an existing one.

Some people have indeed been calling this out, but there hasn't really been long enough adoption for their point to be proven.

It's less "nobody knew" and more "look, our leaders really are shills who have been gaslighting us".
Sorry if I ask you, but why you were in jail?
Previous open-source project on soul-weighing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment
New York Times sues OpenAI, Microsoft over use of its stories to train chatbots
Lazarus Lake on Conversations with Tyler:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/75PyLxu7sZa7GkZtOUI3lJ?si=E...
(Lazarus Lake organizes ultramarathons. He's a legend. You don't need to be a runner to enjoy this)

Amir Srinivasan on CWT too:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/496WOLb5hZmrcH7vt1OqFq?si=6...
(I recall the arguing being fun, but not many of the details)

Carl Shulman on Dwarkesh:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/3ij1JOaafeXoqT0m6sXtBl?si=_...

(Carl thinks seriously about how to reason about AI scale-up)

Overall Dwarkesh seems like the most underrated podcast atm, with Conversations with Tyler being the best. I also enjoyed some Sean Carroll interviews.
This was indeed my first approach, but my employer disallows the use of synergy between personal and corporate devices (I could use it across two corporate devices though).
Fossil can work as a cgi app, it also acts as an http server(which I recommend, put it behind a http relay if you want) or if you are weird it can run as an scgi server. weird because fossil is the only scgi implementation that I know of.
Dijkstra wrote that in 1975 [1]. I don't think it had a major hand in killing off BASIC considering that "peak" BASIC occurred later with the home computer market. The vast majority of home computer users had no clue who Dijkstra was as they happily typed BASIC listings from various magazines and books.

[1] https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD04xx/E... - 18th June 1975
Project planning in the face of uncertainty.

Any help/pointers are welcome!
Anyone in Open Source or with common sense would agree that this is the absolute minimum that the models should be doing. Good comment.
>It was complex because of all of the defenses put in place by Apple and others.

I don't know jack about hardware but it would seem obvious that when one designs a chip, you make sure it does not have 'unknown hardware registers' or unknown anything when you get it back from the manufacture.

This makes everything written on this page worthless...

>Prevent anyone except you from using your devices and accessing your information. https://www.apple.com/privacy/control/
Yeah, this is one of the most heinous feature of HN's comment box.
> Let me guess, sample size of n=1?

No, that one is actually systematic result. That was original reason why they stopped doing it. It did not helped anything. Special help, additional tutors who are actually trained in behavioral and learning issues, those sometimes help. Keeping them back a grade, not much.

> Get better peers?

This real world we live in does not provide better peers. Peers are other kids, those are how they are.

> What you're saying is that it's better for students to keep failing so as not to upset their milieu.

What I am saying is that when they are hold a grade, the system is keeping them failing. They dont get better. It does not magically turns then into better performing students. They will just suck in a way similar to original suck, except that it also leads to them trying even less then before.
I came here to say that. At some point I could literally what full movies on Youtube, pretty much anything I searched.
Why would he know the answer in the first place?
If you have a monitor that can serve as a USB hub (pretty easy to find) and has a thunderbolt input (less easy to find but there are options), you can hook multiple machines up to the monitor and use `ddccontrol` to toggle the monitor's active input. The devices hooked up to the monitor via USB can then follow the monitor to any of the connected computers.

I have my mouse, keyboard, and webcam plugged into my monitor. The monitor is connected to both my work laptop and personal desktop. I wrote a script using `ddccontrol` that I have bound to a hotkey on the laptop and desktop which toggles the active input. Switching the display and USB peripherals back and forth between the two machines is just a keyboard hotkey.

The commands look something like this:
`ddccontrol -r 0x60 -w 3855 dev:/dev/i2c-7 >/dev/null 2>&1'

With the exact arguments dependent on your particular hardware.
Amazon goes as far as to call my heating fan’s temperature control ai. Probably why it doesn’t work and it randomly turns on and off.
The use of the term cretin for those with stunted growth due to iodine deficiency was not a pejorative. Cretin is a different spelling of Chretien, French for Christian. It was short for "poor Christian", a term for those suffering misfortune.
they're afraid it'll give them 5G or whatever shite they make up on the spot
In newer cars the battery is a structural component, thus replacing it entails disassembling almost the entire car adding a ton of labor costs to an already extremely expensive replacement. EVs are a death sentence for the used market that all poor and middle class people rely on.
https://developer.chrome.com/blog/entry-exit-animations#tran...
I came across a couple of journal articles, if you keep digging there's more. I haven't found a longitudinal study yet.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9241677/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35996593/
I'd very much like the two gentlemen to sit down and write a memoir about their mainframe days. The older technologies are particularly fascinating. It doesn't have to be a book, but if it is then they can crowd fund.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hckwxq8rnr0
I see this argument everywhere and have yet to succeed in getting ChatGPT to give an article. This argument is basically a non-starter
Some people dislike the flavor of iodized salt. But what would you expect from future cretins?
The jury heard testimony related to patent infringement. It's true that Masimo chose to seek an award for unjust enrichment from trade secret theft instead of damages related to the patents themselves, but that was a strategic choice on their part. They could have requested damages in that same case.
scientific models and simulations can be and are made very successfully in julia. In particular the diffeq landscape is probably the languages largest comparative advantage
> The CYPD4225 is definitely not rated for space.. if it would work in space

It will. Not too long and not very reliable, but will.

From history of space rockets, they was definitely first created as "two purpose" (except, may Vanguard, which was totally civilian program), so their electronics considered possible radiation from nuclear war, but fortunately, in space found natural radiation, but slightly other type (spectrum).
Currently, SpaceX just use industrial grade computers on rockets (not RAD hardened).

Well, look at tech details: for RAD digital electronics exists two types of problems.

1. Random spikes (switches) from high energy charged particles.
Unfortunately, only Military RAD grade parts have integrated safety mechanisms, for Civ/Industry grades, could make shield with EM field and thick layer of protecting material, like Lead or even Uranium.
When thyristor effect happen, need to power circle (turn off/on and boot), and this is risks source for mission, but most probably, it will withstand flight to Moon.

2. Aging of semiconductor structure from constant flow of particles with high penetration - basically it is just high speed diffusion, which destroy semiconductor structures.
But for Earth-Moon environment, this is issue for long term operations (months or even years).

So, will work.
It is just that practically it did not happened with elementary school students. Special help class with more repetition and teacher trained in learning issues do help.

Also, the issues of failing students are not easily fixable with repetition. They have often attention issues, learning disabilities, behavioral issues, mental health issues etc. that are not helped by repetition at all.
Glock Founder Gaston Glock Has Died: 1929-2023
The professional version is to hire an independent mechanic to do the soldering and wire protection.
It’s kind of simple imo. Apple is an American company and after Jobs died, Apple quickly signed up to working with the NSA and enrolled in the Prism programme.

Apple, like any other USA company, has to abide by the laws and doing what they are told to do. If that means hardware backdoors, software backdoors, or giving NSA a heads up over a vulnerability during the time it takes to fix said vulnerability (to give time for NSA to make good use of it) then they will.

Only someone with great sway (like Jobs) could have resisted something like this without fear of the US Govt coming after him. His successor either didn’t have that passion for privacy or the courage to resist working with the NSA.

Anyone, anywhere with an iPhone will be vulnerable to NSA being able to break into their phone anytime they please, thanks to Apple. And with Apple now making their own silicon, the hardware itself will be even more of a backdoor.

Almost every single staff member at Apple will be none the wiser about this obv and unable to do anything about it even if they did - and their phones will be just as fair game to tap whenever the spies want.

I am speculating. But in my mind, it’s really quite obvious. Just like how Prism made me win an argument I had with someone who was a die hard Apple fan and thought they would protect privacy at all costs… 6 months later, Snowden came along and won me that argument.
Conceptually, it wouldn't be very hard to take the candidate output and run it through a text matching phase to see if there are ~exact matches in the training corpus, and generate other output if there are (probably limited to the parts of the training corpus where rights couldn't be obtained normally). Of course, it would be quite compute heavy, so it would add significantly to the cost per query.
Did Microsoft use its vast source code repositories to rain its AI?
Did Google use its vast source code repositories to rain its AI ? They would also have vast s of user manuals etc. That are copyright? where these used too
Does anyone know ??
As much as it pains me to say it, I don't think Julia will.
It looks to me like the practical problems with Julia, while addressable, are being addressed too slowly.

There is simply too many rough edges and usability problems as it is now, and at the current pace it will take maybe 10 or 15 years to address them.

On the other hand, the major use case for Julia is to have a fast, dynamic language. And it seems to me the time horizon for Python to become fast, or Rust or C++ to become dynamic is indefinite, so Julia is still the best bet in that space.
Depending on the brand, the dealership likely has agreements in place to only do formally approved work, and I doubt "soldering wires together and wrapping them in electrical tape" is covered in the manufacturers tech manual.

More than that, they may not have wanted to risk overlooking a different wire that may have been partially chewed through, sending the car back only to have it short out again the next day. Replacing the whole harness is "safer" (and certainly more lucrative).
I'm not so sure about that. It seems to me that they're selling me a service. Just like I might pay for a subscription to Adobe Photoshop or pay per-render fees to a rendering farm.

I could use Photoshop to reproduce a copyrighted work, and in some circumstances (i.e. personal use) that'd be fine. Or I could use Photoshop to reproduce a copyrighted work and try to sell it for profit, which would clearly not be fine. Nobody is saying that Adobe has to recognize whether or not the pixels I'm editing constitute a copyrighted work or not.