skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Note that it was a single article, B&H claims it was an accident and they deleted it since then.

> “Our editors wrote a test article in mid-November as part of their efforts to identify and protect against AI-generated content. They overlooked adding disclosure to the article indicating that it was AI-generated, which was a mistake, and did not delete the article after the test.”
Python has far more custom syntax than Ruby. In Ruby an elegant syntax like blocks solves many problems, in Python each problem has custom syntax.
China Is Softening Stance on Gaming After $80B Rout
Great question. Here's my response. My thinking is, essentially, doctors aren't really at risk of being dehumanised by having a few people like me. I also don't see myself as dehumanising them, more portraying them as flawed humans pursuing their own self-interest.

Doctors are aware of several positive correlations in Autism, autistics kick ass at the Raven's Progressive Matrices test [1] for instance. Yet the DSM-V doesn't mention this, it just defines autism as a set of deficiencies and impairments [2]. Why is this? Well it's all because the medical system has little incentive to portray their patients as able and capable - this only implies they do not need their help, and thus there is no need for them to provide and be paid for services. So with no outside criticism, this sort of attitude will just be how things are.

There's other controversies I could name, like the genocide [3], the ongoing torture [4], the open eugenics [5], the suspected eugenics [6], the historical connection between the gold standard therapy for Autism and gay/trans conversion therapy [7][8], the stigma against mental illness amongst mental health professionals [9], or worse care through diagnostic overshadowing [10]

I think the point of my posting, is I believe the attitudes towards autistic people in medicine is not good, I believe this isn't some unfortunately inevitable tragedy, or that doctors are inhuman monsters. What I more want to point out is how medical students are introduced to autism as just another pathology in their reference materials like the DSM-V from day 1, and how their views are coloured by this in a way that makes them more callous, and also how this entire attitude helps colour the views of broader society. I find the entire situation very frustrating.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4287210/
[2] https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/hcp-dsm.html
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aktion_T4
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Rotenberg_Center
[5] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3377811/Britain-s...
[6] https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/neurodiverse-age/202...
[7] https://catalystjournal.org/index.php/catalyst/article/view/...
[8] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34407211/
[9] https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
[10] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/inm.13034
Yes? If the assumption is fail safe is better than fail unsafe.

Passive cooling and automatically, gravity controlled control rods to deactivate the reaction are major innovations. Smaller sized reactors that have better neutron economy also reduce waste and have lower total risk
In communism everything was a luxury, unless you were a part of the elite. They had different stores then the masses.
> Comically incorrect. The Tsunami took out a single reactor.

If you don't know it, the Fukushima power plant had six reactors. Three reactors had meltdowns. Four of the six reactors were destroyed. The remaining two are in shutdown since then.

The Tsunami was caused by a strong (series of) Earthquake. The Earthquake caused shutdowns of nuclear power plants. throughout the country, not just the Tsunami.

The fact is, and this is not comical, today only 12 of 54 reactors are running. More than a decade later.

> Human overreaction took out the rest of the reactors.

That only shows that you are living in an alternate reality, where you are the expert and you know better than the authorities in a country, where the actual event happened. I doubt that you have any more experience of nuclear technology than the authorities in Japan.

> "Build new ones." Guess your interpretation wasn't correct.

You can't fully read the thing you posted? Look here:

"Under the new policy, Japan will also push for the development and construction of "next-generation innovative reactors" to replace about 20 reactors now set for decommissioning."

So they will lose 20 reactors. They also want to develop a next generation and deploy it. How many? Doesn't say. When? Doesn't say. What technology? Doesn't say. They say "next generation". Clear: 20 reactors will be decommissioned. Unclear: when and how they want to replace them. Many of the reactors to be decommissioned are probably not even running now, since only 12 reactors are online.

My guess: it won't happen. Second guess: if it happens, it'll take >30 years.

The "next generation" (then) EPR in France has cost increase estimations between four and six times. Planning and construction is now ongoing for roughly 25 years. (-> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_(Kernkraftwerk)#Beginn_der... -> "Bereits 1998 wurde das grundsätzliche Design der Anlage festgelegt.")

The only thing which is sure: it will be late and extremely expensive. Plus: the decommissioning of 20 reactors will cost > 100 billion USD.

Japan is a fast aging country. Where do they get the engineers for all this from? Japan expected to lose 20% of its population until around 2050.

> And a bunch didn't sign but are also expanding at a similar rate, for example India and China.

In reality China brings two coal power plants per week online. Now. -> https://globalenergymonitor.org/press-release/chinas-coal-po...

India has 3% of electricity production from nuclear. Tripling that over the next decades won't change much. 72% of electricity is generated from coal.

Nuclear is too late, too expensive, ...

You just need to check the existing capacity for various power plants and the newly built capacity for power plants from the last years. The trend is clear: nuclear stagnates and struggles to replace aging capacity. Renewable energy is massively expanding, world wide.
I poked around the site, and it was entirely unclear to me that one could buy this feature or how it works.

Can it make it painless to manage multiple APs and to get fast roaming, etc working? UniFi pulls this off nicely — there’s nothing particularly fancy under the hood AFAICT, but it all just works. A more intelligent solution where clients got assigned to appropriate VLANs would IMO be extra nice.

(The enterprise vendors seem to have decent ACL and maybe even anti-spoofing measures for their wired networks, and they have some security features for wireless, but I haven’t seen anyone with a nice solution that makes wired and wireless security cooperate. I haven’t looked that hard.)
WiFi is not considered that important to a hotel or conference center, especially when most people have access to the phone network.

There’s a reason why many conferences deploy their own wifi infrastructure
It's nice to see improvements to Ruby, but the hype around a ~13% performance boost feels... weird.

It looks like a big leap, but when you compare the actual speed to _any_ other language you realize Ruby still has many, many percent to go to even be in the same game.
These articles focus on Tencent and NetEase since they are public, but I'd love to see the accounting room of companies that only make gacha games like Mihoyo, shit must be hectic.
It's still very possible to install classic real mode PC OSes on modern hardware.
What are you trying to achieve with that dataset from LibGen? I kinda expect that GPT4 was trained on the data that is available on LibGen
I wonder if that’s a self fulfilling prophecy. They expect android users to pay less therefore there tends to be a worse experience ( ads or no app at all) therefore android users are conditioned that apps are worthless.
Who gets offended by someone giving them a calendly link? I get offended when someone wants to do some ridiculous back and forth with me. Just send me a link and I'll pick a time that works for both of us. When you send me a link you are saying that you value my time more than your own. Which is ridiculously courteous.
Wholesome <3

So nice to hear you and your colleagues can make the work/life balance out for each other!
Assuming good intent...

If you were testing that a 3rd party detector could protect the system from an insider (writers submitting ai generated articles), you would create a profile.

Since it is the holidays, it's _really_ easy to forget something, particularly when services have "freeze" dates when no further changes to production systems are allowed.
Is there a clear business rationale?

Can that rationale be mitigated by increasing revenue as an alternative to adding the technical risks implicit in your question?

I mean it is one thing if this is a hobby project and using AMD will provide interesting challenges to keep yourself occupied. How you spend your own time and money is entirely up to you.

But spending other people’s money is another thing entirely (unless they are mom and dad). And even more so spending other people’s time particularly when it comes to paychecks.

Finally, I am not saying there aren’t business cases where AMD doesn’t make sense. Just that Nvidia is the default for good reasons and is the simplest thing that might work. Good luck.
Photos and videos are very different from text. 300 GB of text is not comparable to 300 GB of photos.

You can do something using image embeddings to get what you want.
Why am I being served content if I block ads?
The problem is that the person reporting this needs to identity the provider or nothing will get done.

The plane usually tells you if the WiFi is provided by viasat, anuvu, or any of the other big players.

These companies program this stuff before it goes into the aircraft and the airline IT has no access to this stuff.

Without the missing info, it’s almost impossible to trace this.
> Alias: rm
> Command: rm -r
Purpose: Because when I type "rm" I don't want to always have to specify "-r" for a directory.
Alias: cp
Command: cp -r
Purpose: Same as above. When I say "copy this" I always want it to copy whatever I'm specifying, even if it's a directory.

This is insanely dangerous. Don't do this.
This is a very interesting article on computer history. There's a lot that I disagree with, though...
TKey is a RISC-V computer in a USB-C case, that can run security applications
Ask HN: All my iCloud Desktop files are gone
Merry Christmas. Today I logged into my Mac Mini and noticed that all files on my desktop are completely gone. I suspect it has something to do with failing to mount the iCloud drive? Anyone have any tips for debugging or should I cut my losses and restore from backup? iCloud is so unreliable.
From the title, I was thinking "of course the neural network of the LLM is a [cause-effect] sequence of words" thus time is encoded in each connection.
This is probably why West Virginia is never going to let go of Harper’s Ferry now
There's a subtle difference here between the translation scenario and what you observed. In translation, the reversal only applies to the second sentence which will tend to present information in the same order as the first sentence (for most common language pairs).

The improvement in perplexity here points to gradient propagation issues. If it's hard for the LSTM to remember information from the first sentence until it becomes useful in the second sentence, it may be easier to put some of the useful info from the first sentence "closer" to where it will be useful in the second sentence by putting the end of the second sentence closer to the end of the first.

I suspect that reversing the first sentence and not reversing the second could have a similar effect.
> English-speakers are notoriously bad at learning second languages

My experience of learning German is that Germans would prefer to speak with you in English, as they want to practise their language skills with a native speaker.

English speakers aren't bad at learning new languages, rather there is little incentive to do so, given everyone speaks or wants to speak English.

Trying to speak a foreign language is sometimes met with confusion "why are you bothering to learn another language? Everyone speaks English" or downright hostility "if you're English just speak English".
The statement timeout will put an end to that.
Is there a right to free content? Because ads are obnoxious and I do block them, but I also pay for stuff were I can. If ads didn't exist there effectively there would be a pallwall on the internet. As there should be, people need money to live. If people feel so strongly about ads they should either not consume the content or pay for the ad-free version. I use YouTube premium and I've never seen an ad. I get the ad-free version of everything. My child even uses Amazon kids, so she can enjous apps to her hearts content without ads. But I pay for that.

Ad blocking is theft. It's theft that I will commit, but it is theft. When you block an ad you reduce the content creator's salary. We then have to ask: what happens if the creator gets no money? They stop giving the content away "for free".

This is the piracy fight all over again. Again, I'm on the high seas, so I'm not innocent. I still think that we need remember that content isn't free. We pay for it with attention or money. If enough people don't do that then the content won't be there. That's how capitalism works.
Overall mined uranium supplies are quite limited. Numbers back in 2013 [1] put the total uranium available (including estimated undiscovered resources) at enough to maintain current operations for 230 years. Bump up usage by an order of magnitude, and you're running out in 23 years. And Western countries (mostly Canada/Australia) only produce about 20% of that total.

So if nuclear ever became a staple, you'd end up needing to resort to salt-water extraction, or developing breeder reactors. Both would send costs skyrocketing. Salt-water extraction is also going to run into environmental issues given you're talking about processing literally trillions of tons of water (uranium's about 3 parts per billion in saltwater). Breeders also substantially up the stakes in terms of complexity and risk.

If you'd indulge my curiosity, what would be your opposition be to something like solar + artificial hydroelectric? It's relatively cheap, infinite (well subject to access to the materials necessary for construction of solar panels), completely safe in any scenario, and things like artificial hydroelectric take care of the biggest issue of day/night production.

[1] - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-long-will-glo...
I mean, of course, but sounding obviously foreign isn't so bad if your meaning can be understood and you haven't accidentally said something with a wildly different meaning than intended.
> all those limitations taken together, and the C++ designated initialization feature is pretty much useless except for the most trivial structs

We find it pretty useful even with the limitations. Certainly not “pretty much useless.”
Even then I would say that such teams still have a different feel from a true startup.
A lot of people would say I'm transgressing my bounds if I try to use the influence I gained by paying for my server to threaten you into changing what content your server serves to your users. That's the essence of "block X or I'll block you."
This isn't real story, you're overthinking it.
I haven’t used Python in years but from what I’ve understood by reading other comments, factoring out C-based libraries would rule out a large portion of what makes Python so popular. Especially on the scientific side.

So I think you’re right.
There are multiple proper ways depending on your needs and the context. I've used systems like this and I completely agree with you for many cases.
Those who want to avoid these fines will simply use a VPN provider. All the others are sacrificial lambs for T-Mobile's profits.
It's allowed since C++11.
C++ compilers know when a structure is POD (plain old data) and could relax initialization order rules for them. I doubt they will.
An iPad is the ideal form factor for this kind of things. Reading and annotating PDFs on that thing is a joy.
You can let the market figure that out. No need to debate.
That kind of is my point about demand reduction...
You're right, but that's also not the entire workload. You have to also wake up the remote process in some way and, depending on the expected duration, probably wake up for the response. On pretty much all major platforms that work is measured in 10s of microseconds, which puts you easily into the 1000x slower than a non-inlineable function call category.
Over the last couple of years, at least with Google, I've found that no strategy really seems to work all that well - Google just 'interprets' my request and assumes that I'm searching for a similar thing that has a lot more answers than what I was actually searching for, and shows me the results for that.
What about in 2006?
It's interesting to see how the traffic to this article spikes yearly:

https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&plat...
It was a good twist.

I also think yours would have been a good twist.
www.roylongbottom.org.uk/Cray 1 Supercomputer Performance Comparisons With Home Computers Phones and Tablets.htm#anchor1
> Technical curiosity: how site owners are able to detect blockers

Let's take a simple rule from EasyList:

> /snowplow.js

This blocks the loading of any URL ending in snowplow.js. To see if a visitor to my website is using an ad blocker with EasyList, I can set a global variable `window.usingAdBlocker = true;` in my main content and then later change it in a scriptcalled snowplow.js that I include (`window.usingAdBlocker = false;`). So with a fresh Chrome install, the page loads and then the script sets the variable to false. However, with an ad blocker, the script never loads and the variable remains true.

> why blockers are not able to bypass detection?

Adblockers have developed rules to block this detection mechanism. It is a cat and mouse game. For example, there's a library called 'jQuery Adblock'. So the AakList (Anti-Adblock Killer) has a rule to block scripts called `/jquery.adblock.js`

It is a cat and mouse game.
I'm still unclear on why the need for a border router exists at all. My zigbee devices work just fine without access to my local network or the Internet, but the same devices using matter/thread claim to need a border router? What are they doing differently than my zigbee stuff?
TomTom doesn’t know the place I searched for earlier and my phone doesn’t know the battery state of my car. (Though the latter could
Be fixed through an api)
I wouldn't consider basic git usage 10x that for most people
Thanks that was the first time I almost actually understood DCT, excellent video!
It's brutal but true. Either have a revenue model or expect no income. That is the reality. The fuzzy grey bit in the middle is where all the garbage is.

Your idea sounds a fantastic way to make a system incredibly complicated with no actual gain other than a billing dystopia.
Happy holidays in whatever form you all celebrate!

May your bugs be solvable and enlightening.
This works until they shove remote attestation down our throats and it becomes practically impossible because you no longer own your machine
Igalia: Scaling a Worker Cooperative Beyond 100 Members [video]
https://www.igalia.com/
Strace is your friend in such circumstances.
Old TheGuardian.co.uk Layout
Not even close.
I get one dumped on my yard twice a week that I don't even want, and can't stop even after calling their office. I am not the customer.

A newsstand may not give me a paper in the first place without me paying first, but if one is in my possession, then it's mine to use incorrectly.

The web site has the option to not put it's content out where the public can see it anonymously.
"It's not your fault that the world is the way it is, but it is your fault if it stays that way."
For those of us who aren't very familiar with what heavy physics simulations might involve, how would std::is_constant_evaluated() help?
I've used Zola (https://github.com/getzola/zola) for a static project homepage a few years ago to showcase examples with a simple description and a wasm app embedded in the page, it worked perfectly for me and the docs was clear on how to use it. It was very easy to set up along with a GitHub action to automatically update the wasm binaries when needed. It is definitely a tool I keep in my mental toolbox as a good default.
One common use case for DLLs in gamedev is for code hotloading. You can just recompile your game DLL and unload / reload the library, patch up some globals and vtable pointers and voila, your game logic has been updated without restarting the game. And all that you get just writing normal C++.

This is only for development. Shipping builds will usually statically link everything.
You could say the exact same about high school in general. Where you end general education is a tradeoff. You could say 12 year olds can read, so why not let them go be apprentice electricians or whatever.

However, what I or you think is irrelevant. America in general has decided that general education is a requirement for anyone who is college educated.

Every undergraduate professional degree requires general education. Pharmacists, accountants, engineers, teachers, actuaries etc...
You mean the very first paragraph in which the author invites us to reevaluate those reasons? You mean those reasons which include the following?

- Exposing an API that accepts SQL is crazy.

- It's a terrible idea.

- Especially if the API is exposed on the internet.

That isn't reasoning. We don't encounter actual reasoning until:

- Doing that is insecure

- itwill lead to SQL injection attacks

- it is a nightmare to maintain

- it will lock the backend implementation into a specific technology

Even these are highly debatable, so I ask again, why not just expose a SQL API, even over the Internet?
A large portion of the country can't realistically or cost effectively build enough renewable plants to provide reliable energy in all seasons. With current and foreseeable technology, only nuclear can provide the guarantees we need - this of course doesn't prevent renewable investments, but it will be a fatal mistake to not build nuclear plants under the impression that we can just build renewable options instead.
The problem is that the content offered most of the time is not good enough to pay for it.

For instance the so called news. Most newspapers publish ready made stories with their own editorial take at best. Articles are typically processed by LLM so the wording is slightly different than the stock story.

The press has abandoned investigative journalism because it is too risky. Corrupt governments and police can't protect journalists. So they mostly serve three-letter agency approved information and not much beyond that.

and they want people to pay for this nonsense.

If Google wants people to stop using adblockers, they should be forced to share ad revenue with every single contributor. If they show in their results your aunt recipes, the aunt should get a share of the revenue from ads displayed on that results page.
The protocol and network are open, but it’s encrypted and as far as I can tell none of the major vendors allow you to export or import the keys you would need to add a bridge from a competing platform.
Eggs from men, sperm from women: stem cell science may change how we reproduce
My proposal is that my browser downloads all the content, it just does not display the advertisement.

This levels the playing field among traditional broadcast, the content creators get paid and it is just a little less ethical than just getting up to use the bathroom during a commercial break.

If Google and ad agencies want to press the issue, this is really the next step.
The parameter "life eternal" is rather strict. And what is a star but an engine of ascension?