skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
SiriusXM is also in violation of GDPR/CCPA. Before shutting down Stitcher, they failed to respond to multiple data requests within the required 30 day window. Then, they contacted requestors 20 days before Stitcher shut down to direct them to complete a separate, redundant form for their request. They never responded to that form, and presumably they will claim that because the service was shut down within 30 days of that second form being completed, they have no obligations to provide the data anymore.

Pretty scummy stuff.
The larger issue here is that we need to correct the training data our LLMs are learning from.

That would not be such a big problem if our society had not tolerated power-mad moderators who nuked most correct posts and posted correct-sounding nonsense over the last several decades.
It’s important to keep in mind that intellectual property is a notion that arose in Western Europe in the early modern period and can still seem foreign to much of the globe. Even if nearly all countries have now implemented IP legislation for trade reasons, in practice it might go unenforced unless the plaintiff is politically connected. The cutthroat environment that you describe above is still how things often work in Asia, but people go on creating works of their imagination regardless.
I'll answer this from the perspective of a typical web dev/startup shop. Throw it out the window if you're writing safety critical code or something serious. :)

Yes, it's rare but it takes good leadership from both the technical and non-technical sides of the business.

The technical leadership needs to push back on scope and encourage the folks that need problems solved to be descriptive of their problems rather than prescriptive of the solutions they think they need (but at the same time not dismissive of those ideas).

The reason for the scope pushback is that ideas for problems to solve are likely to have some flaws in the hypothesis given until there's something out there in the real world to learn from. So it's the job of tech leadership to work with other parts of the business to figure out how to fail fast and burn as little engineering hours as possible in the quest to become less ignorant faster.

This has the added benefit of making things easier to estimate, I don't think it's controversial to say that smaller scope means smaller task breakdown leading to more accurate estimates. Teams will usually fail to deliver on estimates until they iteratively go through this process and reduce scope until they can consistently deliver.

When that happens you start to build more trust with other parts of the business, and maybe over time, when you do dare to throw out a ballpark scope for what can be achieved in the month/quarter, you're not that far out.

To be clear though, the trust that you'd be asking for as tech leadership should be a two way street, for the most part it's to be appreciated that the parts of the business that some in tech routinely dismiss are often keeping the lights on, and you need to figure out a cadence that allows your teams time to breathe and refactor in such a manner that still delivers product changes.
Information has been faked, to varying degrees of success, for as long as humanity has engaged in intrigue. "AI" does not change this, it's still ill-willed humans and trolls at the wheel faking information.

I always roll my eyes at fears of "AI" faking this, creating that, etc.

Whatever "AI" has done or can do, we've already seen much worse from humanity. Been there, done that.
Recapturing early internet whimsy with HTML
*For Australia
Rules of the internet

1. Don't believe anything you see or read on the internet.

2. Don't post any personally identifiable information about yourself on the internet.

3. Every woman is a man, every teenager is an FBI agent, and every man is a dog.

Every single problem or controversy surrounding the internet derives from breaking one of these three rules. If we just started teaching kids these again we wouldn't have the problems that we do.
New 1.5B-pixel image shows Running Chicken Nebula in unprecedented detail
What's the terrible behaviour Apple has had?
Ask HN: Newer Works by Hal Canon?
I recently came to learn that the composer behind the music in Gauntlet, the Atari game from the 80s is called Hal Canon. He also made music for a range of other Atari games. He was a game designer/programmer too, wrote a game for Atari taht never came out. Anyone know if he has made any music later on? I really liked the Gauntlet music. (Source: https://www.vgmpf.com/Wiki/index.php/Hal%20Canon)
Ah now I see - to get all the entitlements they create a super-app that happens to use those things.

Then they can spy on us for our main use case
They do use a chemical primer.
Exactly, beeper has no credibility
Pedanticism is one of my favorite things about this website.

In this case... while my specific terminology may be lacking, if we zoom out and just compare the US healthcare system to other countries' systems, we demonstrably see lower per-capita spending and better patient outcomes. [0]

If we could agree on those facts, can you help me use the correct words to describe the issue?

[0] https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2...
Do you really need foreign keys?
Oh shit, okay his sentence makes sense. Somehow I missed this part of the article.
This should apply to AT&T, Xfinity and such also who force you to speak with the retention department.
> iMessage is a lock in that they use to their benefit

This is why I think they are the bad guy. They aren't passively benefiting from an iPhone network effect, they are actively and aggressively prevent workarounds that users can do to get around their lock-in.

During the 90s, Apple was the victim of similar behavior by Microsoft, and most tech people correctly vilified Microsoft for this behavior. Now Apple is acting as the villain and we should call that out.
How does a manager argue for funding to make improvements without some sort of metric?

You can't just say it's self evident, because the people making these decisions haven't complied code in years.
Yes, for cameras it is called Bayer. For displays Samsung coined Pentile. It is by far the most common array of mobile OLED subpixel designs (RGGB), used in mobile devices (eg iPhone, Galaxy, Pixel, Huawei, Oppo, Xiaomi).
I am not painting them with the same brush, I'm drawing an analogy to help people understand the context better. In this case, public policy will dictate to what extent AVs are allowed on public roadways. That, in turn, is dictated by trust. I'm pointing out that "trust" may be incompatible with "unpredictability." I'm not sure what throughline you're drawing, but you seem overly hung up on the use of the word "anxiety," and it's causing you to miss the real point.

So to put a finer point on it, people need to acknowledge that public trust is necessary to wide-scale adoption of AV tech. Plenty of psychological research shows how we aren't intuitively wired to understand statistics. So all the bleating about statistics may be necessary, but not sufficient, to get wide-scale adoption of AVs on public roadways.
Yeah, I have expectations... of the police. In most large cities, this is a guaranteed six figure income, with basically no education requirements. They are literally given an "above the law" status via qualified immunity. If they intimidate someone into doing something illegal, like giving up patient information, they should be culpable. Do not punish the weakest person in the power struggle, they are nearly always the victim.
> Because he egregiously misbehaved with his, and this is the resulting punishment

This is like some new form of justice, where, if you hit someone with a hammer we punish the hammer?
We recently are in the process of trying to return a MacBook to apple and avoid them dinging our return allotment. My store sold to a customer who later called us and said it was making them enroll into a PA University's MDM. This was a device that apple sold to us directly.
the ideas matter, not the words.

the art to disagreeing with someone without vilifying them is to recognize their beliefs come from their values.

Even what you're trying to argue about healthcare.

someone who believes in the word of God is going to argue an individual is less important than God's commandments, someone who does not will argue the individual is more important.

And I don't want to hear any whiffle about a dichotomy here, consider it a spectrum between 0 and 1 if it makes you feel better.

------------

The point is that framing this as correct/incorrect is a very poor way to frame it, it leaves no room for understanding.
Pfft. This is a classic example of fuck around and find out. Dude decided to try to sidecar one of the most beloved canons in recorded history instead of coming up with his own IP, then decided suing the estate that controls said IP was his ticket to a life of luxury. Biting the hand that feeds doesn't even begin, they should have been profoundly grateful that the estate tolerated their existence up until that point.
They really thought that Apple couldn’t block it when they originally announced it. Obviously that was not accurate…
You can blame both, it's not either/or.

Hamas is a terrorist group that makes everything it can do to threaten Israel, and has no regard to Palestinian lives.

In the same time, it's getting harder and harder to turn a blind eye to the blatant disregard of Palestinian lives and casualty from Israel. There is a notion of proportionality in war [1], and Israel's willingness to kill civilians is simply inexcusable at this point. Sure you can say that Hamas use civilians as a shield, and you'll be right, that doesn't give the other side a free pass to bomb an incredibly dense zone of already-displaced people.

Even Rony Brauman, the ex-director of Doctors Without Borders said in an interview recently that it's one of the first times they seen intense bombing on a population who couldn't even flee the zone, and at this point Gaza was a mass grave of kids [2].

Israel absolutely does have a right to defend itself, but that doesn't give them a free pass for everything, and right now they are actively undermining their claim on being a democracy with respect on humans right.

[1] https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/assessing-israel-s-appr...

[2] (french) https://pca.st/episode/acfb00a6-2392-454c-a1e0-710ae4df6552
No, I'll pass. But you're welcome to not believe me.
> He also ordered Polychron to destroy all electronic and physical copies of the published work, “The Fellowship of the King,” by Sunday.

It sounds to me like the order applies to published copies rather than to his original manuscript.
Sorry if this is a daft question, but what functions are you talking about?
Microsoft basically has no useful sub (sub is only useful when it comes to app credentials for Microsoft). It has oid, but if you want to support n-providers with just a login field and not a sign in with n button, than you have a problem. Or should the user know its entry lid and insert it into the username field? Most of the time you use an email and what Microsoft does in c# and their docs mean that you connect that with the oid.
And also that’s why it’s stupid that Microsoft and google do not treat the email/preferred_username identifier that well. Because everybody changes the oidc spec
> When they do bad things they do so in our name - whether or not you want them to do it...Transferring the cost to them for acting the way society wants them to act is not the answer.

This _maybe_ works in some abstract way, but each police officer is autonomous and has the leeway to act any way they want.

I have autonomy as well, so I could commit a crime.

Let's say that I grew up poor, and the only opportunity in my neighborhood to make any substantial amount of money was to sell drugs. If I choose to sell drugs and get caught I go to jail.

Now at this point, we can say that we have created a societal structure that limits my opportunities (no economic development in certain areas) and empowered these drug sales (by making the drugs illegal thus increasing their value) to happen, but that does not somehow shift the blame from me to society.

I would do my prison sentence and try to move on with my life.

This apologetic stance for the abuses of the police is harmful.

Police officers are people and should have at least as many responsibilities and liabilities in the view of the law as any ordinary citizen.

In fact, as they are charged with upholding our laws, they should be held to a higher standard than an ordinary citizen. If a police officer commits a crime, then they have committed that crime _and_ they have abused the trust placed in them by the state, county, etc that they work for.
Even if only genuine hotspot apps got the entitlement, it is not a user-friendly privacy-first design. Such API use should trigger a user-visible permission dialog before apps get background-notified and user should be able to select the one of "allow-once, allow while using, allow-in-background, never" and the app activity should show up in app privacy reports.
> Is there even a shadow of truth in this allegation?

I certainly don't see it. Rings of Power is set as a distant prequel to Lord of the Rings; Polychron's novel was an immediate sequel. There are necessarily some characters and other elements of the setting which appear in both, but that's because they're both derivative works of Tolkien's writings, not because one is derivative of the other.

Here's the specific list of similarities claimed by Polychron. To my eye, most of them are either trivial (e.g. a woman rides a horse, a character is dark-skinned, someone says "this is a map", someone makes a heroic last stand), or involve the shared usage of elements from Tolkien's work (e.g. the doors of Khazad-dûm, orcs as corrupted elves, a character is named Théoden).

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.88...
Apple's tight grip on iMessage spurs fresh calls for an antitrust probe
Thank you! I'm a fan of the Nosferatu type of vampire and didn't know that they were sued by the Stoker Estate!
Crickets. Legacy auto has gotten so many multi billion dollar bailouts but people keep repeating this lie about Tesla without delving into big oil and legacy auto.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BrookGPU?wprov=sfti1#

If you’re interested in the early gpgpu work, which interestingly enough worked both on Ati( now amd ) and nvidia hardware.

I agree to disagree :-)
Delivery from online, it's not just for spammers.

In fact, every medical insurance provider I've had for years has tried to push me onto their in-house pharmaceutical delivery service. Traditional pharmacies have been getting squeezed for a long time.
Do gym membership cancellations next.
My understanding is that it's nothing to do with momentum and everything to do with mass.
Elaborating on that is the red herring. We shouldn't have to elaborate on that, it doesn't need to be the central argument here.
Then I have no choice but to believe that you are lying.
>"This distribution indicates that a small subset of neurons, termed hot neurons, are consistently activated across inputs, while the majority, cold neurons, vary based on specific inputs. PowerInfer exploits such an insight to design a GPU-CPU hybrid inference engine: hot-activated neurons are preloaded onto the GPU for fast access, while cold-activated neurons are computed on the CPU, thus significantly reducing GPU memory demands and CPU-GPU data transfers."

Brilliant!
The thing is that it feels force fed. Reactions are adverse it’s counter productive.
This is hilarious. So the judge forbids him to further distribute the book he wrote, but now publishes and distributes it on his behalf. For free. Go figure. Can the court now be considered guilty of violating copyright ?
This has been a bugbear for Android users since practically the launch of iMessage and I have never understood it at all, especially since now we're simply drowning in messaging services that are free, E to E encrypted, and incredibly feature rich oftentimes even outpacing iMessage itself.
I'd say I'm sad that you're sad, but I'm really not.
This is such an insane take to me. Apple hasn't done anything but provide a feature that some subset of their customers in a single digit number of markets finds compelling.

Do you really think that teenagers in America wouldn't be bullying the outgroup—to the extent that they actually are frequently ostracizing their peers over this, which is not at all clear—over something else if all the bubbles were blue?
virtual mailing addresses are real. I have one for my LLC (they bin spam and forward on real correspondence) and there are more involved services for RVers to forward batches to their current location or do mail-to-email.
You can wipe it and reinstall. This happened to me by accident. The software for enrollment at my company didn't work correctly when I got my new MBP during my hardware refresh. Not knowing any better, I figured the MBP to MBP transfer process messed up my new MBP. So I just wiped my new MBP and reinstalled the OS. Of course, this also meant my new MBP was no longer enrolled and was unable to get all the software distributed by the enrollment agent. Once IT figured out what happened, I had to wipe it a second time and do the enrollment process again using some company specific image that was somehow accessible from my home -- maybe from a backup partition?

(Edited: the comments indicates this is no longer possible)
I think Musk has consistently lied about engineers' understanding of how FSD can work. https://www.carscoops.com/2023/03/elon-musk-overruled-tesla-...

He repeatedly claimed that having contradictory radar and camera data means the system won't know what data to trust. Anybody who has worked with data in any capacity can tell you that is complete nonsense. In the past, people would call combining this data "sensor fusion." These days, even high school kids know you just throw all your features into a model. You don't discard red channel data from your cameras because it might conflict with green channel data. Tesla Insurance doesn't throw away all features except driver age when calculating premiums.
AI Odyssey – Dynamic levels and storytelling powered by AI
Check out this demo project showcasing how AI models can be applied to gaming.

The game itself is very simplistic, but uses a combination of models to create fully playable levels.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US2901403A/en

https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2020/1...

https://www.nj.gov/dep/njgs/enviroed/infocirc/StorCavsIC.pdf (Control-F "Repauno Works")

TLDR It is a superior long duration liquid energy storage system vs hydrogen.
Dynamic dispatch is where you call a method on a Box<dyn T> type, where T is a trait.

Cfr: https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.8.0/book/trait-objects.html

This in contrast to generics which is static.
I didn't stop when it became a thing, I stopped after running the site for over 5 years and algorithms changed and it became more of an adops arbitrage opportunity than actually "going viral." The occurance rate of true virility dropped orders of magnitude once everyone started leveraging the same headlines, etc.

I'll read your post
> This sounds too fantastical to be true.

Use Firestick as RDP/VNC client, use mobile phone for internet, obtain keyboard from Amazon Shopping, remote into a VM, proceed as usual?
It's literary merits are irrelevant. This is someone's work, and they are being denied the right to even keep a backup up in the attic. If one party's control over a creative work can be extended to strip another party of any control over his, something's fucked up with the system.
Apart from the author being a peculiar man... Is the book good? Has anyone read it?
the problem here is that the non copyright holder is trying to abuse copyright.

the problem is still in copyright
If you're logging in with OIDC (as is the case w/ the OP), the combination of the issuer and the `sub` claim identify the user (the "subject"). The relying party (the system wanting to authenticate the user) just treats sub as an opaque string (unique within that issuer). The `email` claim is just the "End-User's preferred e-mail address." (And … "The RP MUST NOT rely upon this value being unique" … the end user's email might change … for whatever reason the end-user, or their IDP, might prefer. Also, any other IDP might claim that email as the preferred email, potentially truthfully, too.)

The docs, however, seem to be discussing the notion of the relying party's "user" object. For that … use a UUID, an auto-incrementing int, some artificial key, totally up to you. Link that user object with the (iss, sub) tuple above. But you should consider¹ whether user can adjust their authentication method with whatever you're building: e.g., if I change OIDC providers … can I adjust in your RP what IDP my account is connected to? (Same as I might need to update an email, or a password in a more classic login system.)

(¹The answer is also not always "yes", either; I work with a system where the IDP is pretty much fixed, because it's a party we trust. All signins have to come from that specific IDP, because again, the trust relationship. But, on the open web where I'm just building Kittenstagram, you don't care whether the user is signing in with Hooli's IDP, Joja's, etc.)
That may be true for Cisco specifically; I don't know. But some acquisitions really go well and make sense for everyone.

I don't think YouTube was profitable before acquisition. Now it's profitable and a great product.
Yeah maps are useless. /s

Also who needs a nice big screen to watch Netflix while we are parked waiting to pick up our kid? We can watch on my phone, my wife doesn’t mind contorting herself to see.
That is my thought as well. This was a winning scenario for Beeper because either the iMessage integration kept working, or Apple forced its own hand on very directly locking down messaging to the devices it sells.
I’d hope it would be bricked, since that’s the point of this feature.

(I wouldn’t want a laptop with this feature, but I can imagine the sort of people that administer MDM asking for it.
> Recently one of the biggest FSD proponents on Twitter put out, essentially, a promotional video for FSD, and it showed multiple disengagements and an incredibly dangerous blown stop sign.

Don't forget, it was actually a comparison between Waymo and Tesla in SF. They tried so hard to show Tesla was better, but it was embarrassing how flat out dangerous it was.

Here's the compilation: https://twitter.com/elaifresh/status/1727889381309239731
Marcel, the pythonic shell, now has workspaces
Marcel had its 15 seconds of fame here on HN a few weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37991746

I've added workspaces to marcel. A workspace provides for a per-project persistent command history, environment variables, and a per-project startup script. The new features are briefly described here: https://www.marceltheshell.org/workspaces
>I don't see that there is enough value there to motivate the investment.

People were saying the same about home computers in the '70s and it was relatively true for that period if you didn't look into the future and only considered what home computers looked like back then: janky machines built from radio shack parts by nerdy enthusiast tinkerers with electronics knowledge. Only when they were presented with prebuilt and polished products with usable apps that didn't require technical knowledge, did people see the light that home computers are the future and will become mainstream for all consumers not just enthusiasts.

Nobody can know yet how mainstream VR will look like exactly and who will get to dominate the field and dictate the product direction (Apple, Valve, Meta, etc), but for sure it will happen in the future, even if for now it's just a tinkering toy for gamers and enthusiasts with money.
Blah blah our best interest, it’s a for profit company same as Apple. No one I mean no one will keep looking at the source code and to make sure the one on the phone and the code is 1:1, it’s not a security guarantee.