skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Netflix absolutely does this.

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-some-movies-show-On-Netflix-in-...

(The irony of linking to Quora as evidence doesn’t escape me.)
I always thought about the public discourse regarding wars in general

Let's say the majority of the population is simply 'anti war' and focus on these people.

Is it not sufficient to support this message?

Does not with with us = against us actually apply to wars (or maybe this particular war)

Wonder what your thoughts on this are.
This is only a judgmentalist judgmentalizing. We are all perfectly capable of deciding for ourselves what looks good or hideous to us. Also, it was inevitable that ML tools would be used for things they cannot actually handle. A few uglified movies are really the least of our problems in that regard.
>Since Assange would leak anything sent to him,

According to this he very much does not, only what aligns with his personal agenda:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-l...
It's nice to occasionally read a piece that reminds you what good journalism is.

On and off record sources, people as complex individuals with multiple truths, anchoring to key chronological events, and only moderate clickbaiting and defensible hyperbole.

Nothing particularly new, but a solid brief. Kudos to the Post and Dwoskin, Fisher, and Tiku.
This kind of gives away the reason for his firing.

He was pursuing his vision of AI incluing a chipset specific to LLM processing that would break nvidias hold of the market.

Apparently the BoD didnt like it. They should have just been more forthcoming about it.

Some CEOs would get fired for moonlighting. Others (Elon Musk, etc) build massive companies and make their existing companies more resilient and lasting. The fact that employees closed ranks around him tell you which kind of CEO he is, and the BoD chose to ignore that at their loss
s/average/median/g according to the linked source(cnbc)
That explains why working for Google seems so common. Hmm interesting, that explains a lot about why former Google developers are shit employees.
I like the ideas in the article, and they are generalizable beyond user interface design to programming languages, frameworks, and technologies. Some of my thoughts:

1. Christopher Alexander's ideas on pattern languages essentially talks about what happens when you have composability. You can now analyze or construct how composition happens with a grammar. If you construct the grammar such that all possible designs composed from the grammar is a cohesive, useful design, then anyone -- including the end users of a technology or the inhabitants of an architecture -- can make changes. His keynote speech to OOPSLA '96 is a good introduction to applying his work outside of building architecture (https://www.patternlanguage.com/archive/ieee.html) and his work had inspired the field of Human Computing Interface and computer architecture

2. Ruby on Rails is a good case study for these ideas. Rails is an opinionated framework, initially constrained to a curated selection of "opinions" that are useful for creating web applications. The Rails 3 refactor took apart Rails and decomposed it into primitives (Russian Doll Pattern https://www.infoq.com/presentations/katz-rails3/). And then, those opinions are recomposed using those primitives ... and for anyone who knows this, they can create their own opinionated framework out of those primitives (I did just that with a personal project, intermodal https://rubygems.org/gems/intermodal/versions/0.4.0). This is the "layering" discussed in the article.

3. Kubernetes is a good example of composable self-healing processes. Kubernetes enables higher-level abstractions of different PAASes, but anything built on top of Kubernetes primitives can be modified, and extended. By itself, Kubernetes has a very high floor (good plumbing is hard, and invisible when done well), and there is still a lot of room for products built on Kubernetes with a much lower floor.

4. Erlang's BEAM has a selection of very powerful concurrency primitives (1st class processes as actors; mostly immutable data structures). OTP are higher-level often-used shortcuts composed from those concurrency primitives (GenServer, Supervisor, etc.). Many applications requiring concurrency can be expressed as a composition of OTP patterns.

5. Elixir is built on top of BEAM. The language itself started with a set of barebones primitives, including macros. The syntactic sugar (shortcuts) were built from macros, and the Elixir community slowly developed useful syntax out of that. Other languages with similar capabilities include Lisp, FORTH, and Tcl.
Indeed, reading the article I felt like the author was conflating their feelings about watching analog film, and a director's intentions when creating a movie. The former is an artefact of the medium as it was before everything went digital, while the latter is about a creative vision and a story to be told.
It's a disgrace and a major credibility debility for the US and its western allys that this journalist is not free.
It seems to be part of human nature to care mostly about large cute animals. Nobody seems to care about invertebrates.
2,300-year-old mosaic made of shells and coral found under Rome
edit: misread the title

The uncensored one [1] - finally gave me instructions for making crack and a bomb. It felt cool that it would answer everything, like a 90s zine.

[1] https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/dolphin-2.1-mistral-7B-GGUF

Note on that page: This model is uncensored. I have filtered the dataset to remove alignment and bias. This makes the model more compliant. You are advised to implement your own alignment layer before exposing the model as a service. It will be highly compliant to any requests, even unethical ones. Please read my blog post about uncensored models. https://erichartford.com/uncensored-models You are responsible for any content you create using this model. Enjoy responsibly.
> In other words, since randomly increasing a person’s income does not reduce their crime rate, the first set of theories are falsified

This a rather false conclusion. I will concede wealth alone isn’t a predictor of weather someone is likely to commit crime. But, being able to generate wealth on your own is. The example of winning the lottery doesn’t prove much, since that person got lucky, they didn’t generate that wealth on their own. If you can’t generate your own wealth legitimately, then you will be tempted to do illegally, winning the lottery doesn’t change that, you got lucky once, but you still don’t have the skills to generate your own wealth legitimately.
It's clear from my comment that I think capitalism itself is bad. I never claimed "nothing is bad." Please don't put words in my mouth.
This is what Intel Optane should have given us.

Non-volatile memory right in the CPU memory map. No "drives", no "controllers", no file allocation tables or lookup lists or inodes. Save to memory <16GB, say, it's volatile: that's for fast-changing variables. Save to memory >16GB and it's there even through reboots.
Having said all this I can tell you the one counterexample that would be worth existing.

'Katy Lied', AI-reconstructed to have the textures of 'Aja'.

This is because 'Katy Lied' suffered catastrophic damage in mixing and mastering, using an early form of DBX noise reduction that went horribly wrong. The band and Roger Nichols tried desperately to salvage it, and failed, and every version of the album you can ever hear is the result of a technical process that was broken and didn't deliver the intentions of the artists. They knew this, but they had nothing else to release.

'Aja' is also Steely Dan, but they had the technical side under control (apart from mistakenly recording over 'The Second Arrangement') and 'Aja' features many of the same musicians and vocalists that are present on 'Katy Lied'. Therefore, it's theoretically possible to take 'Katy Lied' and implant the textures found in 'Aja' onto the music in 'Katy Lied'. It would be replacing the existing textures with made-up, fake textures, but the existing textures are so badly compromised that it wouldn't automatically be a disaster. You'd get a fake 'Aja 2' with the music of 'Katy Lied', and it'd be functionally more like an AI upscaling than like outright new stuff being made.
What can be studied with "hard sciences" is extremely limited. To a first approximation we don't know anything by hard science standards.

Just because some fields don't (pretend to) have formalized theories, it doesn't mean the study isn't rigorous.
> If everyone stops eating meat, and starts eating the proteins themselves, we win some 1000% to 25000%

We’ve settled on a system of markets to deal with scarcity. I believe the 1,000% to 25,000% win might have some losers you’re not telling me about.
I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment, but one cant help but think that if he had been more methodological like Edward Snowden, and been more self-aware of his situation , it would have turned out so much better for him and freedom (because he would still be fighting for the cause).

You could have a fighter on the field vs a martyr in jail.

The freedom battle will be won on the field.
Danger UXB (1979)
I'm not American so I don't really follow what Assange did for American elections - but I very much object to OP's claim that Assange "only" leaked things that benefited russia - it can be disproven with a 5 second google.
How to Compare Integer Values in Java?
I'm fine with installing it. It's definitely worth it to clean up results. Seems like ~220,000 users think the same.
I'm not entirely clear how he is subject to any foreign country's laws? Wouldn't he be subject to his own country's laws?
I used to work as a Network Administrator, the team I was on managed something like 200-300 L2/L3 switches and half a dozen core routers.

Whenever a new device was connected, the people who ran the ethernet for us were nice enough to connect patch cables to the building switches. The on-site techs would go setup whatever was connecting and we'd go hunting through disabled ports for one that came up with the matching MAC. This could take up to 30 minutes depending on the size of the switch.

One day I had enough time to scrape together some VBScript in an Excel document we used as our day-to-day documentation of our management IPs. It would snag the list of disabled interfaces from your clipboard, run a simple regex, generate a command to select all the interfaces, and shove it back into your clipboard.

It was disgusting, but it also changed 30 minutes of mind-numbing work with the on-site techs sitting on their hands into around 5. It stuck around for about 3 years.
Mouse Guide
Semi-related how do lidar-based systems handle nearby cars with RPG launchers installed?
I'm sure if these undesirable acts weren't committed it would have been even better.
"Rules for thee, but not for me"
Scrolling the top of the article looking at movies I’ve never seen, I didn’t think anything of it.

It wasn’t until I saw a movie screenshot I was familiar with (“Titanic”). At that point I had to agree with the headline: I immediately said “yeah, she does look like a Pixar character” as the revelation came that I had mostly forgotten what a film looks like. I don’t think this perspective is too alarmist.

Detailed and specific, yes but someone’s got to do it.
Unrelated, but why would a car have a lidar jammer installed?
The same people complaining about the impending demise of democracy are cheering Assange’s imprisonment.
Anyone else remember those insurance files? Whatever happened to those?
> We really need to ban sites like this.

Yes! Let's censor stuff we don't like! /s
Ok, that's really cool!
I don't think people "like" it as much as hate elicits a response from your brain, like it or not.

If people had perfect self-control, they wouldn't do it. IMO it's somewhat irresponsible for the algorithm makers to profit from that - it's basically selling an unregulated, heavily optimized drug. They downrank scammy content for instance, which limits its reach - why not also downrank trolling? (obviously bc the former directly impacts profits, but not the latter, but still)
Nobody has time to pre-read, and if they’re readers and not listeners they should not be at the meeting. They should be doing something else.

The only place I ever saw people pre-read was Amazon, and that was because we printed out the document and handed it out with pens. The first 10 minutes of the meeting were laptops down reading time before the presentation.
Why did he release just Hillary's emails when he had dirt on both sides? That doesn't sound like a journalist.
Mercedes will cover accidents where DrivePilot is at fault; your insurance will cover your faults. Would expect DrivePilot equipped vehicles to store insane amounts of telemetry from all their sensors, which will make it far easier for Mercedes to prove that you’re at fault than you to do the opposite.
> Instead that talent would be elsewhere.

Sadly that’s not entirely true. Some still follow their heart, but end up as mediocre disgruntled engineers in dead end jobs. It’s very hard to fight incentives for decade after decade. When those incentives point towards working as little as possible it’s hard to be great.
can rebind it to A, those extra keys should be put to use!
Is it? I mean, I get that information wants to be free and all that, but publishing confidential information is a crime in most jurisdictions.

Heck, even publishing your company’s trade secrets could get you imprisoned.
> Mercedes-Benz is the first automaker to gain approval to sell a Level 3 automated driving system in the United States;

Yet, Telsa continues to market FSD. Where is Lina Khan on this?
Funny, but obviously any accidents caused by the self-driving. In other cases it is covered by regular insurance by the faulting party.
Thanks.

I wonder whether this line was 50% of the reason for dismissal (and Palestine things being the other half):

> Secondly, don’t make money for investors who whitewash genocide, namely partners at Boldstart, DCVC, Harrison Metal, Redpoint, Bessemer, Sequoia, or First Round.

(I.e. call for boycott. Very uncapitalist)
Miranda!
Also slow is smooth and smooth is fast
They may not have. Or at least not for many years. Digital theater projectors have been a thing for a long time now
I think the reference is to ALP systems which are used to defeat law enforcement speed guns? Not sure if those operate on the same frequencies as the DrivePilot LiDAR. It seems unlikely they do otherwise LE would have difficulty prosecuting speeders in these new vehicles?
Well -- I'm not. I think it's almost an intuitive tenant of non-monopoly -- interoperability.

Also, in practice, I think maybe less than 10% of this site doesn't believe that enshitification is real. Forcing interoperability via open-api standards is the only practical solution I can see to enshitificatin. Such as: any client can call imessage and register a webhook to receieve messages at or download messages if it has username, email, 2-factor token, etc. Or such as any user can access reddit/facebook/whatever with any client and can export their data to a competitor.

(I'm an iphone user for the record, not that it matters)
For years and years and years people have said "just let me pay to turn off ads." YTP is right there.
This comment has a remarkable lack of nuance in it. That isn't even remotely close to how how human motivation works. We do all kinds of things motivated by emotions that have nothing to do with "liking" it.
What makes fMRI objective proof when the mental illnesses are largely subjective?

One psychiatrist could see a patient completely differently from another. You either have Alzheimer's or you don't. Your arm is broken or it isn't. It's measurable.

With mental illness, the line is blurred. I've never seen compelling evidence for fMRI - just circular reasoning. Psychiatrists who buy into this paradigm posit that the disease exists because in these populations of heavily medicated, subjectively diagnosed (heavily traumatized/stressed) individuals, there are similarities between them in the activity of their brain.

Perhaps it's just their disease-first perspective that I take issue with when it comes to fMRI. You could validly look at these populations completely differently without subjective disease terminology and be logically sound with your findings, such as; people tested who experienced more traumatic events in their lifetime and seeing how their brain lit up vs. people who did not experience traumatic events. Or how people respond in institutionalized situations vs. less formal situations, etc.

The person you are responding to shares the same general thinking that I have: medically, there is no disease if there is no measurable physical damage.

As a doctor when you are arguing that somebody has a disease, especially a disease that is thought to be lifelong or perhaps genetic in nature, it's your job to prove that. A check-list of symptoms isn't enough proof. And by going through these lists you are stereotyping your patient. Studying people diagnosed in this way and forming correlations in these heavily stressed, vulnerable populations proves nothing besides perhaps how stressed they are and the different ways that stress is expressed throughout the population.

But when you factor treatment into the mix, physical study of the brain frankly becomes worthless if you are applying it broadly. It could be that fMRI is more or less finding that people on Lexapro or Lithium (whatever the common prescription for an illness is) respond a certain way. Or that individuals experiencing specific types of heightened states (like mania) respond a certain way.

What we are not saying is that there is not suffering, that symptoms don't exist, that symptom groupings (like ADHD) aren't bad or good, it's the disease terminology and intellectual dishonestly of the psychiatric field that we are pointing out.
It seems there's more to it than that [1]. Altman did a surprisingly good job of cultivating a "nice guy" image among the tech crowd, but I personally don't buy it.

[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/what-sam-altman-did-so-bad-h...
And if the wolves were starving you can just start over with a new dog.
They should still pull you over for that. Pilot's don't get to watch an in-flight movie just because autopilot is on.
Unless it's only visible to cops, that doesn't really invalidate what the post you are replying to is saying about unintended consequences.
bsky-social-gpoqz-2s6fo

bsky-social-k2vcy-bbcwf

bsky-social-4z3ir-rndd7

bsky-social-ug2hp-de3br

EDIT: all have been claimed
> Let's take a small example. We have 20 bins. You are going to put 3 things in those bins, with each thing getting its own bin.

Now imagine a number of these bins _can hold zero things_ (not 3). Eg in a world where all bins are the same size, you can always steal 3 things from any of the bins, whereas in a world where the bin sizes vary. You'd hit a few bins which are guaranteed empty. Doesn't this directly affect the probabilities?
Perhaps you should read up on what "legal advice" means. https://www.findlaw.com/hirealawyer/do-you-need-a-lawyer/wha... https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/48016/are-the-abbrev...

> Legal advice requires:

> Education, knowledge, and experience in areas of the law

> The ability and experience to apply that knowledge to specific fact patterns

> An understanding of how the application of the law affects the client's legal rights

> Practical expertise in writing legal documents or other documents to support the client's position

> State or federal licenses that allow legal representation in court

Whether you write "this is not legal advice" or not has absolutely no bearing on whether it actually is legal advice or not. The phrase is used by actual lawyers when they don't want to mislead the general public about thinking that the legal information they provide is legal advice. Non-lawyers use it to feel fancy and sophisticated.
Given that the game is always the same (layout and wind/gravity/physics don't change), it's not surprising the "robot" succeeded. This is less about reasoning and more about trial and error and memorization. I doubt you need much AI to build such a system.
That is not what racemic means, ratios can exist.

There's a whole section, "Single-Isomer Versus Racemic Formulation", in this recent review article titled "Novel Formulations of ADHD Medications: Stimulant Selection and Management"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8412159/

The psychiatry handbook of Massachusetts General Hospital also uses racemic in this context
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B97814...

Also, I can't find any data on what percentage of Adderall prescriptions are XR, have you found anything?

Looks like the LRx database would be the place to look from scanning this report for the DEA.
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/docs/IQVIA_Report_on...
I've done a presentation or two consisting entirely of images and memes.

It forced me to really memorize what I was presenting because I couldn't refresh my memory from text on the slides (or, horrors, read the slide aloud). I typically don't use speaker notes.

But afterwards, the slides weren't much good to the participants or to future me.
Firstly, this is not a war, it is a genocide against unarmed civilians. Anyone saying anything else is absolutely evil.

Secondly, if anti-war is a synonym for anti-violence, which I believe it is in this case, then the cold reality is that Palestinians have tried peaceful protest before, and they were simply gunned down by laughing IDF monsters. Some regimes will only be defeated by violence. This Zionist regime seems to be one such.

Lastly, silence in the face of such atrocities is violence, as the cliche has it.
How did you get the trillionth of a percent? The total space is 2^64 and they found 24,964 videos. Based on their estimated number of videos (13,325,821,970) we can infer[1] that they have made the equivalent of a sample of size 3.46e13. I say equivalent because of the "cheating" they mention in the article which improves the efficiency of their method so their actual sample would be 32000 times smaller I guess). Anyway as shown in the link below that's a good sample size since it gives a precision of about 0.6%.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38744227
Sam Altman is a pretty polarizing figure, seemingly by virtue of both who he is and what he's touched.

This article has a lot of pros and cons to the man, all of which seem to track with what other sources have reported about him.

E.g. the "if he cares about you you, he really loves you; if he doesn't care about you, you don't exist" brutalist attention filter that a commenter here reported seeing (in one of the ad nauseum OAI CEO threads)
Or perhaps people will understand that this is a car with an abundance of sensors, and all sorts of data about what it "sees" (including actual camera footage) will be stored and used in this sort of litigation. At which point you're taking on a multi-billion company with a hugely vested interest in winning any legal challenges.

I'd say it's a far more like buying a lottery ticket. Good luck!
Aha, thanks! And here I was, thinking that speed guns were just doing basic radar stuff, but I guess speed guns have evolved like everything else.
You should try Tetris DX, it plays way better than the original Gameboy Tetris.
Yeah Currently

- Only in CA and NV

- Only below 40mph

- Only on specifically mapped freeways ("only available on freeways that have been mapped by Mercedes")

- There MUST be a vehicle in front of your car

- "reasonable road conditions with readable markings and lines"

- "clear weather"

- Daytime only ("Drive Pilot can’t be used at night or in the rain, and the headlights and wipers must be set to auto for it to work. ")

- Can't be in a construction zone

https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/27/23892154/mercedes-benz-dr...
Why? All the recorded telemetry is going to show up in discovery anyways