skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
FYI: the last time W3C, Inc. endorsed a WHATWG HTML snapshot as a recommendation was in 2021 ([1]), for the WHATWG snapshot published January, 2020 whereas the 2021 and 2022 snapshots were rejected, with no new review process having started since.

Reasons for rejection include
a reporting API seen as privacy-invading and related disagreement over whether W3C's HTML WG could augment/redact WHATWG spec text like they used to be doing until 2017 when the previous HTML recommendation was published, or has to go through WHATWG process for any change according to the W3C/WHATWG "memorandum of understanding" which thus hasn't resulted in common understanding after all ;) Another reason was objection against the so-called HTML5 outlining algorithm, which Steve Faulkner actually has gone to great lenghts removing in WHATWG HTML upstream (cf. [2] for details).

Unfortunately, the removal also brought incompatible change to HTML (the content model of hgroup, among other incompatibilities), rendering existing content invalid, which WHATWG set out not to be doing but which they lack the methodology of preventing and for which the spec derived from Ian Hickson's work frankly lacks formal qualities to support. Even more unfortunate is that this change has already spilled to derived standards such as EPUB3 which hence makes existing EPUB3 content using compound headings going back to 2011 invalid, and EPUB3 writers lacking a tool for actually verifying what readers can support (epubcheck was blindly updated without consideration for the installed base). Technically, Review Draft January 2022 and newer should then already be called HTML 6. Since nobody gives a rat's ass (including W3C, Inc.'s dormant HTML WG) anyway, and gross misconceptions about HTML specs prevail, like in your post, I'm not sure whether we should call it a day with WHATWG/W3C's HTML specs already.

[1]: https://www.w3.org/blog/2021/whatwg-review-drafts-of-html-an...

[2]: https://sgmljs.net/blog/blog2303.html
> Google didn’t deliver a chat-powered generative A.I. product despite working on one for years.

Don’t forget that Google translate has been out for years and used the GPT structure they invented.

Also I think Google missing the ball on the GenAI chat will go down as one of the biggest AI and tech fumbles, even if the fads around LLMs fade. They beat OpenAI to creating a chat interface- but they had all that drama last summer of some crazy religious employee getting spooked at it being sentient, so they locked it down. That’s probably what gave OpenAI the idea to ship ChatGPT honestly.

Also this labs page clearly looks like a vanity marketing site to remind people (?) that Google Does AI (tm).
>In the UK you can buy a £100m apartment and pay virtually zero tax each year on it.

You will pay £11,911,250 in stamp duty though.
how democratic is a system where losing the popular vote doesn't imply losing the election?

the Senate being a strange beast is not surprising, it's by design. it's important to prevent tyranny of the majority. (after all usually populism quickly switches gears into that, then slowly but surely throws off the other restraints and it becomes a usual dictatorship.) of course, it bears asking how well the Senate is doing at this prevention.
Active Directory or LDAP are widely used to manage permissions and roles both in and outside the MS ecosystem (Entra seems to be AD rebadged), but requests are usually handled with a ticketing system (eg. Jira has "service desk" functionality, but other tools do as well).

Most ticketing systems also integrate with email, and most would have a Slack bot too.
I've started swapping ESC and caps-lock first using emacs. However, I feel, if you have a good MX keyboard and press Ctrl with your palm. It is actually really nice
Friends don’t let friends build auth. Use open source, standards compliant solutions if you don’t trust a company. Just don’t reinvent the wheel.
Way too polished and 'large' for a labs site.

It's as if Google are trying to work out what worked well with their Beta programme (which I used to enjoy and get excited about) and replicating it as a finished product in the 2020's with 'modern' design.

The way they communicated beta projects a decade ago was 100 times better. Just raw, simple, unfinished, and clearly things to play with.

This site just looks like marketing garbage. Sorry. Just annoyed at it.
I find the new trend interesting, to sell the game on Steam, but have a link to Github with the actual source. So free for developers and people who care to find out. Thats fair, I think, but I would prefer if the direct donation model would be more established among the masses.

But this link points to the general site, with lots of options and also directly the free version. Kudos. Will try it out later.
Yes. I wish we'd move on from the tired more/less government debate and focused on better government. But neither party seems to care.
This is especially a concern for Google Drive, considering how pirates use it.

Until very recently, nearly all CSF (clean steam files; the uncompressed, cracked game files) archives shared on the biggest video game piracy forum were stored on Drive.
Neil Gaiman's Son Thinks His Dad Is in Charge of 'Doctor Who'
IMO, an approach to DEI that would be both ethical and effective in meeting its objectives would include the following: primary school initiatives to get young girls and minorities interested in STEM topics, secondary school initiatives to encourage the same to choose (and prepare them for) a STEM major in college, corporate recruiting initiatives to broaden the pool of applicants beyond the typical target schools, employee support initiatives to give them the tools they need to succeed and advance in their careers. It has to start early.

Instead we get quotas for college admission, hiring, and promotion. Then, when the quotas aren't met because the candidate pools are way too small, we tell admissions officers and hiring managers to "stop putting up white males". Like everything else in corporate America, it just becomes a metric to be gamed.
https://archive.ph/WUgSu
Yes the use of auto is rare, and should not be used in the first place. Still i don't like silently breaking old code. You cant just do a search and replace. This is valid:

auto float f;

so a search and replace would break that code.
Just use Mullvad vpn into USA and gain access.
Rolling your own is rolling the dice, but using something like Okta is guranteed (to leak).
> Best to have a second vehicle.

Ironically turning moot any environmental aspect of owning an EV.
I ran on a 4G machine until very recently, and from experience I know you're right. You can still run "Electron apps" by the way, just not 6 of them, and not in combination with 28 Firefox tabs and full HD movie in the background. I did have some problems at times, but my dev usage isn't typical. I currently have 8G and I never have any problems.

But also: these machines don't ship with a Linux desktop, lightweight or otherwise. You need to judge these machines as-sold, and almost all are sold with Windows as the only option, and 4G really does seem so low I would argue it's just not fit for purpose as a general purpose device, and really shouldn't be sold as such. It's like a car that's advertised as a general-purpose car that can only drive 80km/h. Is it a perfectly functional car? Sure! But also: not really what people expect, and not really fit for purpose. It's fine to sell this if people know what they're buying, but most people don't really know what they're buying with "4G RAM".

Whether that is a sorry state of affairs or not doesn't matter, it's the reality of it.
GP did agree that there are some cases where this doesn't apply:

> Not all businesses are the same, and I'm sure there are some where you need to run auth in-house (like if you're selling on-prem software), but I'm mindful that most companies simply cannot run auth securely.
Good point. I work in security and although I care about privacy and self-sufficiency, sadly enough most (usually smaller) companies that have a dogmatic self-host policy tend to have a complete mess as infrastructure. Old software, servers that haven't been updated in ages, known vulnerabilities, semi-configured services, non-existing documentation or contingency policies, the list goes on.

Companies should focus on their core business, and not underestimate the efforts involved in straying off the beaten path. You might be a master in gluing technological solutions together, but you might end up under a bus and woe upon those that have to figure out your handiwork. Even I myself have stopped self-hosting stuff like email for personal use because at some point, life happens, you have kids and jobs and deadlines and other responsibilities, and something might break just at that moment you really don't have time for it, and you just don't want to have to worry about stuff like if emails are getting through.

Luckily there are some more ethical alternatives to the big industry leaders, for whatever your interpretation of ethical might be. It's always possible to support companies that are contributing something back to open-source software by choosing their paid services.
Also, they only disclose to GMX, Microsoft and Cisco, when they clearly write in the article that there's quite a big quantity of Postfix servers impacted (more than a million by the mentioned figure):

This might not seem bad at first, but looking at affected SMTP software on the Internet is a different story. After testing some popular e-mail software in their default configuration, it turned out that Postfix and Sendmail fulfil the requirements, are affected and can be smuggled to. Speaking globally, this is a lot (figure 31)!
I wasn't aware of this, I would like to give a shout out to superjson (https://github.com/blitz-js/superjson) which I had been using to solve this problem. I will look at this solution for next time.
I disagree on that. I find that the people that usually use AI to code don’t actually know what they’re doing. Of course there are exceptions but you really shouldn’t use AI for anything other than autocomplete
You cant make a compiler diagnostic, because it was valid before and after C23, the code just means different things. In fact just using auto without a type was bad practice in earlier versions, now it can be considered a feature, so its less likely to give you a warning now than in the past.
A big difference between 1946 and now is that we have the internet, so we can see how the Nazis described themselves with only a few clicks, eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanns_Johst#Schlageter

Are there any problems with this rough definition?

Nazis: right-wing racist nationalists (who thought women should occupy themselves with children and believed in the bullet more than the ballot)

Of course, it's possible to attempt to confuse the issue (witness Putin, starting an "anti-fascist" war of choice by invading his neighbour) but that smacks highly of the old lawyer's tactic of kicking up a lot of dust* and then complaining that no one can see.

* this is the friendly version; a less friendly one ends "... placing oneself at the mercy of the court as an orphan"
You’re 100% correct with the insanity. I ended up buying the last supported 27” 5K iMac with the intent of using it until support ends. Then I’ll replace the innards with a display driver board, making it an external display. This is a significant cost saving vs the equivalent Studio Display.
IP over Spaghetti (2019)
This comment made me lol. This is one of those things where the more money is involved, the worse the results. A shared struggle/history/luck and decades and generations is the price, so if you get started now, maybe your grandkids will benefit, but not you for at least a few decades.
Exactly my thought. If this is a peek to the innovative power of Google.
>The quote by itself is so generic it's useless.

to me it means - you will be able to write code that allows you to save and retrieve data from various online services that offer data storage without having to know the particulars of each one of those services apis.

Is this what it does? And if so I wouldn't think that was useless information, at least it is useful enough for me to determine should I Read on?
Are you serious? Never heard of that. Did something actually happened, how such type of revenge work?
Just don’t generalise about massive groups of people? “Eastern” and “western” culture are not monoblocs.
It's not a straight line, no. In 1970 it was around 320ppm, so not quite 100ppm less than today as opposed to 100-150ppm. So 0.3% slower, again if you take those performance numbers at face value which you probably should both, because they are the result of experiments that take place at levels of 1000ppm and beyond and it's unclear if they even apply to lower levels.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1091926/atmospheric-conc...
The expectation is that you import the whole library and not just one function. At which point, lodash is smaller than if each function was implemented separately.
Besides fixing bad C code: how many of those packages are still properly maintained? The Ruby ones don't seem to be. Fedora and other distros likely have to build their packages with patches.
You are right it is bad to use typeless variables, and its also bad to use auto in C23 to infer type. So this code should never be written, but its still bad to break existing code.
Sure but you cant bike and drive the car at the same time right? So they own a car and choose to bike. Imho this is even bigger win than people who have to bike because they cant afford a car.

Lots of the peoples car needs would probably be covered by some form of car sharing but this is something car manufacturers hate and it has been always quite expensive. Maybe that will change.

New driver licenses are rapidly dropping in europe. Lets see whats gonna happen but i think Netherlands/Flanders are for sure important pioneers to get inspired from.
https://www.stopabductions.com/
Thoughts from someone who is both (a) currently on substack, and (b) has domain experience with legalistic positions:

https://popehat.substack.com/p/substack-has-a-nazi-opportuni...
"Are you sure about this?"

No. And I hope to be wrong.

I will give it another try then, but I was using SharedArrayBuffer and I was getting explicit errors about this limitation.
There are many mechanisms powered by the Huygens weight drive + a governor, for example many clocks.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maintaining_power
> These clouds trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere

Wait, that's the problem with them? Naïvely I would think on an average day they are absolutely dwarfed by actual (by which I suppose I mean natural) clouds? Even without but especially accounting for longevity, the contrail evaporating vs. the cloud sitting there all day.

What am I missing, or how big of a contributor actually is it? Or is it just 'well we're a bit stuck on jet fuel, what else can we do' even if the impact is minimal?

TFA calls it 'low-hanging fruit' and 'the equivalent of removing carbon from the atmosphere at a cost of 10 dollars per ton or less' - fair enough, but I suppose I'm thinking how sweet is the fruit; equivalent of removing how much carbon at that cost? (It also says aviation accounts for 3.5% of warming, but not how much of that is contrails.)

To be a bit pithy/facetious about it: I can go and turn off some light bulbs right now, 'the equivalent of removing carbon from the atmosphere at a cost of nothing per tonne'. But I can't do very much of it!
> If I get a rental car from Hertz or similar and then park illegally, nobody claims this means Hertz should get a ticket or be shut down.

If you get a rental car, and let it in the middle of the road, you will be fined and Hertz might sue you.
I tried the first demo, not available in EU. I might return next year to their demos, or never. Next year the demos might also not be available in EU.
> Inconsistent return statements

Returning the wrong data type has been an error with Clang since the earliest days. Why does GCC still allow that?
It’s because it’s sold on Steam mostly for the features that directly integrate with Steam (like joining friend’s games). If you don’t care about that, the game is free :)
So glad this finally adds support for the "Live" tab on channels!
You hit on an unappreciated truth. By the time my papers appeared in print, I was so sick of them and the endless effort involved in taking them from raw data to finished, edited, proofed, rewritten a zillion times to meet the reviewers' and editors' requests and corrections and suggestions, that I didn't even read the published paper when it arrived as preprints and in the journal.

Enough!

My proof: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5DdrMc8AAAAJ&hl=en
Try this: https://github.com/refuel-ai/autolabel

Then the main challenge just becomes prompt design, which can sometimes be nebulous for NLP annotation.
When OpenAI or other companies demo a model they put more effort into it. Google doesn't care about getting people to admire their work.
I think it’s nice that you can do both. There’s also ways you can turn Serpulo into RTS if you gather enough guys :)
Locally run LLMs, specifically being able to run them on your Phone.
Oh, all of those starving Arabs seem to have gone, not sure why, I guess we'll have to take this strip of rubble and corpses, just to clean it up you understand. Oh look, there's some oil [1], would be a shame to leave it in the ground ...

[1] https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/6/21/palestines-forg...
> What was it like when the first stars began to shine?

Hot. Very hot.
If you can't collect tax because of a war going on then printing money and inflating away the value of your currency is probably the next best alternative.
> Web Components give the basic blocks of writing those frameworks easier.

No, they don't. Both for the fact that they need 20 more web specs to fix issues that none of the frameworks have, to the fact that they are actually pretty bad as basic building blocks: you can't control their rendering (once a web component is on the page, it will eagerly render, and will pull in and render whatever imports it has); shadow dom breaks all sorts of expectations; each is an isolated rendering block, so you can't control for batch rendering; there's no server-side rendering story to speak of, and that's only off the top of my head.

There are many more tehcnical reasons than I listed, but I'd have to hunt them down. There are many, many, many reasons why even the authors which originally really rooted for web components, and modeled their frameworks after them now moved awaya from them completely (Solid, Svelte, Vue).

There are also many, many, many reasons why even the new framework overwhelmingly _don't_ use web components for anything.

There are a few thoughts^

- Ryan Carniato (Solid): https://dev.to/ryansolid/maybe-web-components-are-not-the-fu...

- Ryan Carniato's stream on web components: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEWkLXU1Wlc (you can skip to 1:37:17 for a specific discussion)

- Rich Harris (Svelte): https://dev.to/richharris/why-i-don-t-use-web-components-2ci...

- All these issues are still there, 4 years later: https://twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1198332398561353728

and so on and so forth.

> but JSX does not run natively in the browser. WCs do. There are compromises.

JSX is probably the absolute last thing frameworks care about. They do care about things like not jumping through hoops to make things work.
I get your angle, and hope you're in a happy place now.

Though I'm not saying people are worse off today in comparison to the fifties or some past where people "suffered in dysfunctional and abusive relationships and couldn't get out" and "mental health" wasn't a thing.

I'm saying that within recent decades, and even within the current decade (not some past where they "couldn't get out"), the trends are worsening. It's no great consolation being "better than the 50s or the 80s" when you're worse than the 00s and 10s and getting worser year by year.

It's also not people being alone because they're getting out of abusive relationships more. It's increasingly that people don't even get into a relationship to begin with. Heck, the statistics show that young people (18-30) even have way less sex.

And they're not happy about it, as if they made a winning choice: they're reporting being more depressed and bitter.
Do you remember Google Wave? That was the last time Google had balls to try an new vision. The last day of exploration, after that it was just exploitation (make money).

A long time ago they even started a trend - 20% time for personal projects, that was an act of exploration, but now they lost their curiosity and playfulness.
In Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood, you come across many ot Leonardo's war machines. As an assassin you befriend Leonardo and must destroy his blueprints as well as any prototypes the Borgia created. Very historical game worthy of checking out.
Cynicism is counterproductive. Daszak and co lied, leading to the deaths of millions, not to mention the disruption of the lives of billions.

Not holding these people responsible only makes it more likely to happen again.
At least three of my neighbors I can see from my front door here in America have 5 to 8 cars.

But that’s also because they have to be multigenerational to afford a SFH these days.
Nobody doubts maglev works (there is also a maglev in China and Germany also had a test track since the 80s). There are a lot of things that technically work, but are not economical. The math just doesn't add up to build this in any way that is economically reasonable.