skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I hope they become as irrelevant as IBM. The business world should be subject to regular wildfires. Old, calcified overgrowth cleared. New companies and innovators to arise from the ashes.

I hope it happens to them all. Companies shouldn't last forever.
How did you extract midi from the cart? Or is the method to listen to it in game then recreate manually in midi? Or something else?
My recollection is during the early on road testing, Google was required to report on all collisions, regardless of severity (which another poster mentioned isn't the case here), and that in most of those collisions, the Google vehicle was hit from the rear at low speeds when the driver behind expected it to go through; without video or other imaging it's hard to judge the exact circumstances of course (and even with video it can be difficult). There may have been a couple inattentive drivers that ran into them with more speed. And the collision where the Google car tried to change lanes into a VTA bus that their algorithm predicted would move for them, being a professional driver and all.

From driving near the things, they're very cautious and sometimes start to move and don't (I saw one try to make a lane change for about a mile on el camino before it was able to, turning the blinker on and off the whole time).

>> in early testing in Mountain View, when they were using the Google name on cars.

> Early testing? From what perspective.

You know, before they switched the name to Waymo.
I see a clear evolution (and career) path for Sysadmins here. From ssh-ing and rebooting machines to operating higher-level tools and influencing the business.

Is this what people think sysadmins and operations do all day? Any place i've worked with an operations team, they were the group deciding on datacenter sites, switches, routers, architecture, operating systems, configuration management, monitoring, services like DNS, dhcp, network security, access control, on-boarding / off-boarding, etc. If you weren't in operations you didn't deploy or make decisions on production changes. At a few other places this was split into an operations and infrastructure groups that worked closely together as they had to plan EOL replacement and new build-outs together.

"Wisdom arrives to anyone exposed to how systems behave. SRE shouldn’t rob developers this learning opportunity."

SRE has always seemed to just be a push for a dedicated sysadmin that can read/write code to support a specific application in production. As noted in the quote above, you can just replace SRE / developers with development / operations. Its the same circle all over again.

Lastly, on-call is just companies being cheap. For startups this might be a good initial solution but for anything that has to be online you should have 24/7, follow-the-sun support teams. This allows for teams to solve problems within their normal work day and not have someone up all night to fix a problem, brief everyone on the issue, and then if they are lucky have the next day off.
Darktable 4.6.0 released
So does project like Mozilla sccache.

- https://github.com/mozilla/sccache
Religiosity rate within the Muslim world are up in the last 50 years. They call it the Islamic revival in their historgraphy. Same dynamic in Qatar, UAE and Bahrain as it is in Yemen. Wealth doesn’t automatically lead your society to abandon a belief in god. History did not and will never end.
There is now an issue ticket in ssh-mitm to discuss the similarities between ssh-mitm and terrapin attack: https://github.com/ssh-mitm/ssh-mitm/issues/165
Then I don't have a good memory of it.

GO SUB line number isn't the same as using GOTO?
Well, if what you need is a flat file system, the json-as-database approach that penx is taking isn't really an improvement.

I'm interested in what advantages you have lost. Joplin allows you to export your entire notebook as a directory of markdown files (with front matter), and from a performance, reliability, and replication perspective, a database seems like a much better choice.
I can't imagine what you could take from one place to another that isn't trivial if they've got to the point of being even able to provide the technology. In the grand scheme of things, these rules are relatively high level. There are NDAs but that's more about non-public roadmaps, timelines and specialised IP i.e. future things that a competitor could then have time to work towards.

The point being, there's no world where a fab would worry about sharing their design rules.
They didn't accept it. The revenue is too small.
Say I'm already using Obsidian, what would be some cool features it can add to my workflow?

Side note: "Privacy first" but then "Login with Google" :)
The billions Biden threw their way isn’t really that much when their fabs cost billions to build. Don’t think the grants cover the full cost of their new fabs - it was 50 billion total right divided among all the corporations including TSMC, IIRC.
> worse than native software outside the browser

...for typical portable C code the performance difference is surprisingly small though (within 20% or so). The main advantage of native compilation targets is that you have more "manual optimization potential" via non-standard language extensions like builtins and intrinsics (usually at the cost of portability and compiler compatibility).
>let me reassure you: you can. Everything on the internet is expendable.

Every single thing on the internet is expendable. The internet as a whole is arguably not. I think that's where the rub lies.

>It may come in as a surprise to some but yes, you can have a life without the internet.

really depends on the person. I would not have my current career nor WFH role without the internet. It doesn't mean I can't "live", but it would cause a radical enough shift in my life that I'd essentially become a different person. I'll leave that answer to the philosophers.
I’m not sure, not really an expert in this field, just casually interested as an outsider. When I bought my Mac, 64 was as high as you could go.
Messaging networks have a network effect. You have to use the same one as the people you're communicating with, so if two or more people don't want to use the same one, at least one of them is forced to use the one they don't want to.

It doesn't matter how many other networks there are when you can't get your group to use those instead.
My point is that I sincerely doubt that these notes will have any usefulness in 30 years.
Fyi, if you are ever looking for a fun project you might be able to implement this. The vscode editor source is available as a library https://microsoft.github.io/monaco-editor/
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/healthybuildings/2021/09/09/imp...

CO2 affects cognition all around.
Apps for web wouldn't need app stores. You just point the browser to an URL, download and run. The browser would just isolate the app.
Pressure egypt to let people flee? Have the US take in the 2 million people? These are 2 of the many ways to enable non combatants to get out of the area.

If one's solutions are built around preventing them from fleeing a war zone, one doesn't really care about them.
While I mostly agree with you and the sentiment (and also a bit sad about it), I want to point it out that parting mainstream, staying explorative still helps you discover cool technologies and services outside big tech.

I kinda _depend_ now on syncthing, organicmaps (openstreetmaps), and maybe even Firefox's offline translation service (just to name solutions to those concerns you also mentioned).

Maybe the common theme here is "offline" (so that you are off the loop of big tech's services), and being offline has other positive consequence anyway.
Since we are talking about web components, I just drop my web-components-based framework here: https://realm.codes
JH7110 has the best upstream support among Linux capable RISC-V SoCs.

Any PineTab-V specific hardware, however, might add extra complication.

Out of the box is just not a thing yet.
HumbleUI: Managing State with VDOM
You have to be very careful of Maxwell's Demon when it's a question of entropy: how efficient is that laser? How does the efficiency change when it is in a heat bath of X kelvin?

There may be some neat tricks, this is an area I know I'm not good at, but you have to be very careful.
but how is that going to prevent it from happening?

if they can get the code from you, that is as good as having your face id and they can access everything..
On the other hand, "semantic" flavor of MathML (as opposed to "presentation") is much easier than TeX for things like screen readers, both conceptually and in practice.
The hash symbol looks really out of place in js.
> Yes and even within that they are risk averse, no need to look beyond 10nm and their reluctance to EUV.

Actually from what I heard, their failures with their Intel 7 was partly due to trying too many unproven technologies - i.e. they pulled a Zumwalt. With their current Intel 4 & 3 I heard they were more conservative.
We head to wait a long time but web technology is now finally able to recreate the flash websites of yore without using flash.
The naming fails here as well - "clone" imlies it's an identical copy, so it contradicts whatever deep knowledge of structured serialization you have
A difference is most Dutch families have one car, whereas the majority of American families have two or more.
That's a sad POV. Sure it might be hard to build the next social network without a lot of ad spent (likely always was) but you can definitely build the biggest social network for let's say tee drinkers and grow it naturally within an enthusiast community.

I too built things my whole life and have years of 'failure' on my back but I live of income I make on 'niche' sites no major company is ever going to compete for. No unicorns, no million dollar business but honest money for honest work.
Thank you for clarifying, I get what you mean now.

That study is over a decade old though. And I would think that there's too many confounding variables at play there. IMO the biggest confounder is "society issues" that make women feel less safe in general in public spaces. In my local neck of the US, I pretty much never see solo women eating outside at night, vs solo men and mixed groups.
Combining Heritrix and PhantomJS for Better Crawling of Pages with JavaScript
Definitely not. But I would say scamming thousands of poor people out of their life savings (e.g. FTX) is worse than violently assaulting someone. Violence isn't a necessary condition for a crime to be among the most damaging to victims.
> Zettelkasten-like connected notes web

ZK isn't a notes web or anything like that. Just because it can replicate some of the ZK 'methodology' doesn't mean it's Zettelkasten-like.

It's a wiki-like connected notes application.
This is not strictly true. But if you want to "make it big," it's pretty accurate. However, as a one-or-two-man-shop, you can make a pretty good living off of "commodity software," for which there is still a lot of competition. To make money there simply requires showing up daily and maintaining the service, adding new features, etc. As you show your service to be more reliable, your small customer base will recommend you more and more, and you'll grow.

An excellent way to spot these opportunities is to see what services big companies give away for free. These companies feel threatened by these things and need MORE competition, not less (look at what happened to email hosting for a good example of what happens if people don't compete).

When I see a company offer me something for free, I immediately see what it costs (I want to understand the value I'm getting, at a bare minimum). What I see out there is a thriving economy that I never would have thought to look for if it weren't advertised as "free."
> I really don't understand the hate for Web Components (this article is certainly not the first one to hate on it).

- They completely ignore any and all developments in the user space

- They are bad for any of their stated purposes (of which there have been several)

- They require complex specs that make the platform more and more brittle, and impossible to reason about or implement. Most of those specs exists only because web components are so poorly designed they introduce problems no other tech in the space has.

- After over a decade in development they still need 20 more complex web specs to fix issues that, again, no one else has: https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents-cg/2022.html And yes, this list only appeared in 2022 because it took the people who push them 10 years to finally come together and discuss what is needed to mark them as more-or-less complete

They will claim that "web coponents is 'use the platform'" even though it's trivial to show that web components are the worst citizens on said platform. I can't think of any tech that has been as ill-suited to the platform as web components [1]

- The previous bullet point exists because the entire development has been purely ad-hoc haphazard "we'll fix issues later" by people who continuously make a suprised pikachu face when stuff doesn't work even in the most simplest of scenarios that others have pointed out from miles away.

- Don't forget the complete arrogance of most people driving all this. They will deflect and ignore all questions and criticism, they will blame you, users, React, God, or anyone for not understanding their grand vision (that they themselves cannot explain) and for not using this. They will stoop as low as borderline gaslight even the people who work with them on developing this (reading through discussions on Constructible Stylesheets made me lose faith in humanity)

---

[1] https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1717580502280867847.html
If you're serious about opening up literally everything and probably destroying all the leverage for possible business models how do you expect companies to keep providing the services you enjoy at the moment?
Cool stuff, looks like WAAM but much better.
I've converted a bunch of old photos to 3D for my Looking Glass portrait -- it's more like 2.5D because the depth map generators tend to slice photos into planes which pop out but if you're artistically inclined, you can tweak the depth maps using Photoshop etc. -- and it is quite startling to see old photos come to (semi-) life.
I feel that selling machines with 4GB nowadays is almost criminal. Even 8GB is bad if you can't upgrade.

Anyway, I won't consider Acer because I had a terrible experience with my son's laptop, because the hinges are just designed to break. To be fair, Acer fixed it even after the warranty had expired, but I can't get over how fragile the thing is.
Everything can be sidestepped, it's not the point. The point is for some users (a majority I suspect) info pages have the entry barrier too high. Not very high per se, but too high compared to what you normally expect from documentation which is no entry barrier at all. That happens due to an unfortunate combination of circumstances most of which have nothing to do with info pages format itself which is quite good.
https://www.nysun.com/article/as-october-7-deniers-emerge-we...

"Mr. Gözükara tweeted on October 29 that it’s “a proven fact right now that Israel killed many of its citizens,” doing so for “territorial expansion.”"
Uuuh you're sorta failing to mention that the common conspiracy theories are that they contain population controlling chemicals. Seems less like a really fast change and more like completely unrelated things
It's not a human readable format outside of simplistically formatted text, but even then the vendor locking is solved via exporting to that simplistic format so that you can easily do that when the app dies and you need to move to another one, no need for every app to suffer the limitations by choosing that as its internal data format
> "Open source is only free if your time is worthless"
The main reason to use FOSS software shouldn't be the price: indeed with commercial competitors at a few $/€ per month that require less work on your part one can rightfully wonder if he's saving money with FOSS software. But also control over your tools and not giving away personal data has a value.
In summary¹: instead of sending CRLF.CRLF to end the email data part, send something like LF.CRLF and append more SMTP commands. The server accepting your email may interpret this as part of the body and forward it to a system which interprets it as the end of the body, with the rest being interpreted as more SMTP commands coming from a trusted system.

This allows you to relay arbitrary commands via this SMTP server and submit another email. An outbound relay may pass SPF (unlike your IP). A vulnerable inbound server may let you bypass certain checks (such as SPF, but perhaps also a malware filter) because the server you're talking to is trusted by the internal receiving server.

As an outbound example, Microsoft wouldn't allow you to pretend to be admin@hotmail or admin@another_customer_of_hotmail's when logging in with your regular user account and submitting an email, but this attack lets you submit two emails appearing as one to their initial system, so only the first one is validated.

¹ the article starts with a TL;DR but that doesn't actually mention what the vulnerability is, only how cool and widespread it is (I agree that it is cool and widespread, but that's not a TL;DR of a technical article, that's a dumbed-down executive impact overview). It then goes on a 1700-word lecture on how email and http works before telling you more about the issue.
SAD light therapy lamp straight to the balls for 30 minutes a day. I work from home so I can have it on under the desk whilst on zoom calls. People just think the brightness is a ring light out of shot.
For scientific articles pagination is still important, because it's how you refer to a particular part of a paper. If things like font size and line spacing are at the control of the consumer, pagination is not preserved.

This problem is harder than you one would think naively.
You know what you are talking about!
I suppose they could have just sold it to the highest bidder.
Yes, it's "Technique not appearing in this episode", to paraphrase.
The linked discussion also lists some huge limitations of the flat markdown file system, how did he discredit himself?
If they had reported things... well, it wouldn't take over a year to deal with this.
It seems like this tool is creating a hierarchical document database, it reminds me of XML, but it's json! (or serializes to json at the very least)

I don't know what to make of this. I do like the fact that it's a tree, and you can sort of create a document-like hierarchy. The issue with enforced hierarchies is that you now have to find a spot in this arbitrary tree structure for every note you take.

It's also a little jarring that list items are treated in the same way that two articles would be. I'm not sure I like that. Lists are a useful readability tool, but articles and chapters are semantic partitioning concepts. I get a little bit of a weird feeling when this is the only representation of the note set that's available. And it feels like cross-referenced notes might be difficult to represent.

I do like the representation from a minimap perspective, and it's making me think that maybe the best solution is to use this tree-view as a UI model rather than a canonical representation.
> Build it and they will come

Is my exact strategy. My first startup I desperately tried to find any form of confirmation that my product has a need. I couldn't find it, nobody appeared to need what I was creating.

But I was half done and published it anyway and it was a huge success for me. Still haven't met a potential customer since outside of my customers. Also no paid ads, just Reddit, hn, ...

I think the actual problem with the approach is how much time people spent before they actually test their idea.

It's a full time gig for me, I can afford coding 2 months just for throwing the project. Wasting a year, next to working a normal job, on a MVP that won't sell is a stupid idea. But if you can built 6 ideas in that year it might work out.
>I paid for my device, they should have no control over it, yet they do.

no they don't. Even with this theoretical header, they wouldn't have control unless it was an OS-level setting (even then, it'd be trivial to spoof).

they have data you desire, you send a request to connect, they use info in that request to give you a response. malicious services aside, the worst they can do is send nothing, or only undesirable data (a page full of nothing but ads, that you'd block. resulting in nothing). It doesn't control your ability to tab out, close the tab, switch the browser, nor change your OS.
>This planet cannot support many GBs for every human.

It can and it does.
What shocked me to find out that web components start to replace the input field. And my tooling broke.
Don’t worry, AI will end most SWE jobs within 10 years. Significant amounts of the population will learn about morvecs paradox which is that it’s really hard to automate away physical labor intensive tasks but shockingly easy to automate brainy tasks. Hope you like construction!
We also found effects of CO2 (a proxy for ventilation) on cognitive function. For every 500ppm increase, we saw response times 1.4-1.8% slower, and 2.1-2.4% lower throughput.

Which is why you open a window: Atmospheric CO2 is at around 410ppm. And rising, yes, by around 2-3ppm/a. So I suppose it's making us around 0.02% slower per year, going by those figures.

We need to curtail emissions, but not because atmospheric CO2 is affecting cognition.
It does, but in fairness we are talking about the second hardest problem in computer science. I, for one, prefer it to deepCloneKindOfButNotReallyWatchOutForTheCasesThatMightSupriseYou.

"Structured clone" is enough to give you pause and question "what could structured mean?" (just as you did), at which point you will read the docs and find out. It succeeds in communicating what it needs to.
Ah you mean Open Source^tm. If the source is on Github that's what open source de facto means _these days_.

not to the priesthood of course
Joplin's kanban plugin is quite nice:

https://github.com/joplin/plugin-kanban
> You run win 11 arm in an arm VM and it's the windows 11 inside that has its own x86 emulation :)

That was the question. For instance, as far as I understand WSL generally does not work inside VMs (because WSL2 or 1 or whatever number transparently uses another VM itself). So I wasn't sure whether WoW64 does work inside VMs, glad to hear it does.

The claim was that you have great backward compatibility due to Rosetta ... except that due to 32 bit libraries that is not actually as useful as claimed. Not sure what your correction is?
> while Apple funds all the million messages.

A text message is, on the high side, 1000 bytes, so a million messages is <1GB. For reference paying $0.09/GB for bandwidth is considered a high price.

This is not a number which is literally zero, but it's a number which rounds to zero.
Not sure how this is possible, when it’s already cheaper in many places to build new wind and solar than to burn coal in existing plants. What kind of “irreversible damage” do you have in mind?
Seems like a simple fix, just do a global search & replace of 'auto' with 'int'.

In the rare case where someone used 'auto type foo' you'll get compiler errors and can easily fix those.

I have never actually seen auto used in a C code base.
I've used pinfo in the past as a nicer interface to the info pages.
So you object to the starlink dishes sent and feel he should have waited till the State Department got itself in order