skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You aren't missing anything except that Catalyst is included in the Tailwind UI lifetime license that many HN readers bought years ago so this is likely from an "insider" email campaign, rather than a marketing landing page for a standalone product. It's not meant for general consumption yet.
The Hermès Birkin bag[0] is probably a better example.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birkin_bag
I'm sure there are instances where you have to model these parts manually, but I've never run into a situation where McMaster-Carr[1] didn't have the models I'm looking for.

- [1]: https://www.mcmaster.com/
Perfect timing for Agenda 2030. No one will own the new Bugatti, we’ll just summon one when we need it. Totalitarianism is going to be rad.
Might be worth it in a datacenter, especially if it's operating other servers alongside (perhaps I/O bound web serving or something); perf/$ does matter, definitely, but the state of the art is moving quickly (getting faster/more efficient) and optimizing some models for CPU is still relevant IMO.
Wait, so what is the vulnerability precisely? Article says it requires prompt injection. Doesn't prompt injection open up a whole range of vulnerabilities though? How is the prompt being injected in this scenario? Does the attacker basically assume root access to the target's machine?

edit: Ah, I see - they created a custom GPT (as in GPTs) that enables the attack explicitly. I suppose that's problematic, but then so is the inability to inspect a custom GPT's system prompts. If OpenAI is really concerned about this they should have an approval process similar to the App Store. Or, you know - make the whole situation easier to inspect.
Facts can be seen as important without implying any specific interpretation of them.

I consider the speed of light being 299,792 km per second as worth remembering even if I have no specific use in mind.
At least ChatGPT 3.5 also has that problem. Ask it to summarize in X sentences, chances are it’s a wrong amount.
Is putting processes in separate memory spaces not a security boundary to you? Isolating separate app responsibilities in separate UIDs? Filesystem permission bits? All those are "weaker" boundaries than containers. Do you really claim that these have ZERO security value?

That's silly. Of course containers are a security boundary. They have advantages and disadvantages. Treat them as tools and not slogans.
Wrong. LAPD is subject to the same rules.
“Israelis using young Palestinians as blood bags”?

Seems like a modern take on the the ugly ‘blood-drinking Jew’ stereotype.
What's RV and SV charging?
Yeah, We also think that's a valid scenario, but seems as of now we are marketing on a 2C community and world...

That's something we definitely need to figure out how to fix the gap between marketing and target customer...

Initialise it's also a requirement raised by one of our big company customer.

BTW: I would like to share more about the reason behind

Why we are trying to build http://supadoc.ai?

Our team is confident that GPT-4's capabilities have reached a point where it can serve as the primary author of documents. This goes beyond the current trend in collaborative software, where AI is used only for minor, isolated adjustments without a comprehensive view. This understanding forms the basis of our approach.

With this in mind, we aim to identify fitting scenarios through a process of rapid iteration and embracing quick failures.

Moreover, we intend to leverage this method of applying technology as a way to promote our low-code platform on http://muyan.io, which is our main area of focus currently.

Thanks for your reply and info, and wish you a good day
I agree that they have a bunch of security features, because they've been playing security whack-a-mole for a decade. Retrofitting a security boundary onto an existing system is very difficult. Personally Linux containers are still not at a level where I'd trust them for something that was meant to be a hard security boundary rather than a damage mitigation exercise, though obviously that's a subjective judgement.
Women prefer men of a similar to older age, men prefer women of a similar to younger age. In countries with high fertility, the latter pool is larger than the former. And even when women lower their standards in response, this doesn't solve the problem, as it doesn't cause men to lower their standards.

It's the exact reverse in low fertility countries.
Whimsical is amazing.

https://whimsical.com/
Thank you, so many people make this typo sometimes I question myself if 'scrapped' actually makes more sense.
> The car controls the charge curve.

Exactly. If a car uses an 800V battery and can charge at 500A, and the charger can supply 500A at 800V, and the adapter is only rated for 150A, something needs to tell the car not to draw more than 150A. Similarly, an adapter rated at 400V that is used with an 800V car needs to tell the car or charger not to charge at 800V (which may mean not charging at all).
That's not how the history of work actually happened.

Specialization predates dedicated work spaces by millennia—the ancient Egyptians didn't "do literally everything themselves", they had quite sophisticated division of labor, with craftsmen regularly operating out of their homes. Even after people started receiving wages, work continued to be routinely done at home. It was less efficient to maintain a second space large enough for all your laborers than it was to just send them home with the materials they needed to get the job done, then have them come back with the finished product.

The industrial revolution changed that because now there were very expensive machines that were doing mostly actual work, and the people needed to be where those machines were. Once people were primarily interacting with ideas centralization still continued to be preferable because communication technology was limited.

COVID proved that the centralization is no longer necessary—our communication tech is sufficient to run an effective team distributed across the world, and very few jobs have the kind of large, expensive shared machinery that started the centralization process. There may still be preferences towards shared spaces, but those are personal preferences, they're no longer just the reality of work.

There was a 200 year window where centralization was a necessary feature of industrialization and knowledge work, but that era has come to an end, and it certainly wasn't long enough to become some sort of evolutionary fact of life!
> HP achieved a yield of 9%, meaning 91% of the dies failed.

This line really stood out to me - I was aware early semi yields were poor, but this poor? Was this par-for-the-course for technology at that time, or was this bad even by 70s standards? What do typical yield numbers look like today?
It looks like I would need the following for this to work:

To use iMessage Contact Key Verification, you’ll need:
iOS 17.2, watchOS 9.2 and macOS 14.2 on all devices where you’ve signed in to iMessage with your Apple ID

Unfortunately my work iMac isn’t on Sonoma, it’s on Monterey. I suppose I could log out on that machine, but still, a bit of a shame older versions aren’t supported.

Am I reading the requirements correctly? Does this mean that for all devices to work with CKV, then all OS’s need to be updated, or will it not do CKV on any devices if even one device is not supported?
Yeah, I'm confused on what the complaint is? Is the desire that it is always explicitly coded in a config file? You could probably dump the keymap to a file on initial load?

You could extend that so that if default is different from the last time it was loaded, you could let the user know, and then replace with any user defined one. (Letting user know is mainly so they can decide if new commands need mapping.)

That said, I'd hazard this is not that useful?
I recall being at an organization where an engineer wanted to clean up the code. He ran complexity analysis and showed some of the Java functions had a cyclomatic complexity of 1000, when it is generally agreed that this should never be more than about 20. This was because Android had a "dex limit" in the number of methods it could support at the time. Engineers couldn't add new methods because of this limit so all the functions just got bigger and bigger and no one other than the original engineers could make changes.

This engineer tried to make the team aware but the senior engineers were, IMHO, wanting to avoid culpability more than looking for a fix. The bad practice had fixes but they were expensive and they had kicked that can down the road for years. It was also a form of job security.

He was marginalized and eventually fired for having a toxic attitude.

After reading this post, I really wonder if he could have done anything differently. His attempts were sabotaged by people more committed to protecting their fiefdoms and 401k trajectories.
You sound like you think of yourself as a loser to remote work, but I assure you that in most cases there are not losers. My company is fully remote and we all choose to be here. No one is bearing any burden of the rest of us being remote because we all are remote and we structure our work accordingly.

I'm sorry your job sucks, but I suggest again: get another job. Wasting time telling other people in a completely different work environment how much your job sucks isn't going to persuade them that they're in the wrong.
This is not so surprising if you consider the fact that finetuning is extremely sparse and barely imparts any new knowledge to the model. The paper "Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunch"[1] made this clear:

> We initially demonstrate that SFT LM (either encoder- or decoder-based) always tends to acquire excessively redundant delta parameters. To be specific, we present DARE, which randomly resets some delta parameters to zeros based on a drop rate p and subsequently scales the remaining parameters by a factor of 1/(1 − p). Despite its simplicity, with the assistance of DARE, when the LM model parameters reach 70 billion, we can eliminate up to 99% delta parameters with minimal impact on model performance (see Figure 1(a)). The more parameters the LM has, the larger p it can tolerate. This discovery suggests that SFT LM indeed learns a multitude of low-rank structures akin to LoRA [25]

Insofar as those adaptations are mostly distinct, you can just preserve both sets and that's what explains successes of merging, I guess.

1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03099
why not use a captcha?
Yeah. In a growing population this meant that many young women couldn't find partners.
How it’s not self-hostable if it’s “fully open source” as they claim?
> I'm interested to see what the uptake is among users

My suspicion is that it'll be quite low for many years, for two reasons:

- It requires a recent iOS and macOS version on all of a user's devices. Still got an old iPad lying around somewhere that doesn't receive software updates anymore? No key verification for you. (In a similar way, Apple has been making older devices obsolete by preventing Notes sync in some previous iOS version. This is only an issue because all of these apps are not updateable outside of the core OS.)

- It requires users to be logged in to the same Apple ID for iCloud and iMessage.

The former will only change once these old devices completely die – I just don't think many users will value key verification enough.
it just sounds like you might have ADHD.

how many browser windows and tabs do you have open usually?
I bought Tailwind UI when it first came out, and have been thrilled. I view it as essentially I paid for a high quality template to build off of. You are still expected to know tailwind, or at least that's how I took it, I am not sure how its advertised now, but I am pretty sure its not advertised as a batteries included OOTB solution, but more as a starting point. From that perspective, I have been pleased.
I wish there was a "frameworkless" version. Just include the JS/CSS/Font(s) and paste the html and there you go.
Slightly off topic, but has anyone read the license[0]?

This point feels really odd to me:

> Creating an admin panel tool (like Laravel Nova or ActiveAdmin) that is made available either for sale or for free.

I mostly get the other restrictions. You can't buy the kit then repackage it and sell it. But why can't you make an admin panel?

[0] https://tailwindui.com/license
Oh great, it's like a more advanced OpenSCAD but cloud-only, not open-source, and pay-as-you-go.
Pretty web site. Love it.
You have misread the article, I believe.

The article opens with this quote: "The National Retail Federation earlier this month retracted its April assertion that nearly half of the $94.5 billion in merchandise that went missing in 2021 was stolen by retail rings."

It later clarifies that the $94.5 billion number that the NRF used is the "total shrinkage" - i.e. all unexpected inventory loss including theft (but not just theft).

> "Overall shrink accounted for $112.1 billion in losses in 2022, up from $93.9 billion in 2021 [This is where the $94.5 billion number comes from I believe]. Internal and external theft of all kinds, “on par with previous years,” accounted for about two-thirds — or $73 billion — of retailers’ shrinkage"

So they released a statement that implied that theft was up ~28% year over year (by using total shrinkage instead of the theft numbers), and that organized groups were responsible for half of the total theft. The truth is that theft was more or less the same as last year.
Even though the discord said they refund with no issues I haven't asked for a refund but tailwind ui was not worth the money unless react is being used.

Such a massive disappointment there isn't any JS with the "vanilla" components.
Cause that's not what it's for? It's like the opposite of headless components. It's all head and no component. That's what you're buying. I think that's pretty clear cause that is what Tailwind is. It's CSS, not a component library. That's what this thing is.
This is not an informed comment. New immunotherapies for cancers are real. It's just that they are very expensive. But it's not right to claim they are very far or imaginative.
Once upon a time, treating even some of the people fairly was a win.
I'm a bit confused about the delivery of this. It's presented as an installable web app, but seems to be completely broken in chrome for android.

I'm not sure what I expected trying to check it out on my phone, but I'd at least expect to be able to run it on a tablet. The use case for running it on a phone might be to view, but not edit a project. One might need to review changes and reply to an email chain or teams chat between meetings from their phone if this was going to be used in the real world. Would suck to need to juggle nth-revision PDF exports about an app design. Everyone hates that.
https://chat.openai.com/share/61fd3182-d513-498f-a85f-58876f...
What free alternatives exist other than ShadCN?
This is awesome! I was able
to validate some trivia: everything in Wikipedia leads back to philosophy…
All you have to do is search something and click the hyperlinks randomly and eventually you’ll end up in philosophy…

Very small degrees of freedom so far..
> In simple terms, use Tailwind UI for anything you like as long as it doesn't compete with Tailwind UI.

That part I guess explains that. Tailwind UI makes admin panel themes and components so that’s a direct competition.
Which industries?
Or! they're trying to get ahead of legislation (looking at the UK) by presenting a fait-accompli
Right I think implied in my question is “who decides who is who?”

Certainly the native populations and black slaves didn’t have much voice here.
Is Keyoxide based on the Keybase codebase, or is it a new development?

I quite enjoyed Keybase back in the day, but then they pivoted to being a crypto wallet, and were ultimately acquired by Zoom (a move I understand less every day, since they obviously gave up on their bold promises of end-to-end encryption they made back in 2020).
I paid for DivMagic extension which lets me select elements on a page and it generates tailwind styled html code. It was quite useful for the first month but will probably cancel soon.
Income Inequality Has Been Transformed Globally
With at most a ~30 min dispatch time, I dont know why a turbine wouldn't be adequate - what the turbines can't do, I would think a battery storage should be able to do. I suspect we have the same issue in Texas too.

What gets me is people propsing battery storage as a replacement for turbine peaking plants - which seems like a poor mix. I wish more places could build pumped storage, but it's hard to build.

I'm still a firm believer in nuclear though, with a mix of nuclear, renewables (solar, hydro, wind), batteries, and gas turbines, we should be able to solve this.
https://archive.ph/BHOBE
Tailwind UI includes JS for many components. https://tailwindui.com/documentation#vue-installing-dependen...

> If you'd rather write any necessary JS yourself or want to integrate with a framework other than React or Vue, we also provide every Tailwind UI component example as vanilla HTML that you can adapt yourself.
More competition in the UI components is good.

If you are new to the space, you may check Mantine components.

They are arguably better and more mature.

The reason Mantine is free is because the maintainer is not doing it for quick bucks.
> To avoid technical debt, don’t write code

I think there's some truth to this, but code isn't always written by software engineers and isn't always executed by computers. You might end up with crazy Excel macros, and/or arcane people-processes with single points of failure.

To "not write code" at all is probably to never move or do anything. Sure, you never lose if you never play, but you also never win.
Flowbite looks like what tailwind ui should have been.

Designers I have worked with want to use flowbite so their figma comps are accurate and i think tailwind ui not having figma assets is a huge drawback.
> Rolex are the De Beers of the mechanical watch world.

Except that Rolex doesn't have a monopoly on the watch market. Plenty of other 'fancy' watch brands you can buy (Patek Philippe, Omega, A. Lange & Söhne, etc).

Besides the 'financial' aspect of high-end watches, one can enjoy the different aesthetics different brands have, and the mechanical intricacy of various complicaitons like (e.g.) tourbillons.
Lee Cronin: Assembly Theory Nature Paper – Lex Fridman [video]
It’s a common trope in the field that we’ve already cured cancer in mice. They are similar enough to be a useful model for study. However, they are still quite different to the point where you never quite know how treatments will react… especially in cancer.

The biggest issue is that the mice we use for research typically have no or a highly depleted immune system. One of the biggest breakthroughs in the cancer field (IMO) is the development of humanized mice. These are mice that have had their immune system genes replaced with the human versions of these genes.

This is incredibly important for work like this where you’re studying cancer cell-immune cell interactions.
Oh man, if this is more or less tailwind ui but already turned into thoughtful react components, I’m all in. Tailwind ui has been useful as a reference of a non-trivial implementation of tailwind css that you buy, which is great. Try to drop the examples into a real application and you’ll have a bad time, it just feels like something should exist already… and here it is! Hopefully, anyway, will definitely try it out!
They’ve also built way more coal plants and nuclear plants than anyone else. What’s your point? China is a massive country with massive electricity needs (they still use half per capita that the west does and they’re trying to close that gap).

Nuclear and coal is the plan for baseload because solar/wind doesn’t cut it for that use (coal I believe is intended to be a mechanism of last resort intended to never be run as long as other alternatives are available although I suspect reality will not be so kind).
the probable success of Catalyst will prove once again that people believe that an expensive product is automatically better than free ones.
This is mostly an issue with C++ specifically. If you implement the lexer hack[1], C can be parsed using an otherwise context-free grammar.

C++ suffers from requiring arbitrary tokens of lookahead before being able to determine whether something is a declaration or an expression statement, which is a consequence of the combination of C-style declarations, function-like casts, and function-like constructors.

For example, here, the parser cannot know whether the variables x, y, and z are being redeclared in the same scope, or if they're being evaluated and discarded, until it reaches the "new int" part. Last time I tested it, clang++ parsed it correctly, but not g++.

int x, *y, *z;
{
int(x), *y, z, new int;
}

In C++, "int(x)" is equivalent to "(int) x" (and this doesn't exist in C), but as a holdover from C, it also allows redundant parentheses in declarations, so one could also just redeclare x in a new scope like this (in both C and C++):

double x;
{
int(x); /* x is an int now */
x = 5;
}

I think this is a variant of the most vexing parse[2], which your lock guard example also sounds like an example of.

You probably already know about this, but I was surprised by that example even knowing that C++ requires arbitrary tokens of lookahead to parse correctly, because I had only seen the Timekeeper example from Wikipedia.

There's also the problem that it can't parse something like this unless it knows whether it's supposed to be a template instantiation or an expression statement, but I think that's just an extension of the typename/variable problem that it inherited from C.

a < b, c > d;

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexer_hack

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse
“Shindyapina hails from Russia, which has a long-held cultural fascination with longevity technology”

Does anybody find this puff-piece strained and idiotically written?
I still don’t get it. The fact that women prefer men of similar age or older … there are plenty of young men of similar age for young women, in fact it’s nearly one to one, then you add in the older men. For young women their suitors outnumber them.

Seems to be young men and elder women will always have a shortage of suitors no matter the population ratio between young and older people. It’s just that the shortage worsens for young men if the ratio leans towards more older people and the shortage worsens for older women when the ratio leans towards more young people.
I missed this comment first time around, but I really appreciate this write-up.

I apologize for being a bit snide in my original challenge, I'm fairly sensitive to the "why don't you just" attitude, but I agree with pretty much everything you have to say here.

I have a very similar approach around enumerating and testing assumptions when the going gets tough, and similarly have found that has enabled me to solve a handful of problems previously claimed impossible.

I think the tautological issue with our initial framing is that if you're able to easily identify these problems you probably are a subject matter expert. In many ways it's the outsider art of analytical problem solving - established wisdom should not be sacred.
In fact, it seems like this would make Beeper and similar approaches an order of magnitude harder.

And I could totally see Apple making non-verified contacts' bubbles a different color sooner rather than later...
From the linked docs:

> Catalyst v0.1.0 is a development preview with unstable dependencies.

So, yeah, it's still a work in progress.
Hah same here. Learned enough tailwind to be effective for my personal website. I’m writing a blog article about it. Gpt4 didn’t produce satisfactory layouts so I learned grid-cols and flex, which is useful for groking existing tailwind layouts.