skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It feels like it's sort of it's own thing. LLMs are really good at morphing or fuzzy finding.

An interesting example – I had a project where I needed to parse out addresses and dates in a document. However, the address and date formats were not standardized across documents. Utilizing LLMs was way easier then trying to regex or pattern match across the text.

But if you're trying to take a text document and break it down into some sort of a structured output, the outcome using LLMs will be much more variable.
Right, but while medical offices are third parties, they are also something you cannot (literally) live life without. I would argue that makes them extensions of yourself in the sense that they are acting purely on your behalf in an essential capacity. In this way they are like lawyers, who you need to interact effectively like the court system. In that vain, communications with your medical professionals in their capacity as your caretaker should be strongly protected.

That logic applies similarly with your computing devices.
Yeah and I was trying to implement their workaround for missing dynamic dispatch in a generic-heavy multithreaded async (tokio, hyper) context..,

Cfr: https://github.com/plabayo/tower-async/pull/12

So far didn’t manage to produce a box that works without everything else in my tower async stack having to need send sync trait bounds as well… and of course needing nightly ‘call(): Send’ return bounds.

Despite that, haven’t found a reasonable working solution to support that in ‘tower-async’

Might be just me still having to b learn a lot. More then happy to hear feedbacks add help on these matters.

And of course this is a WIP. So fully understand. Respect to the entire async wg team. Onwards and forward.
It doesn’t “double” anything except a number in the corner of your screen.

The frames you’re getting are not based on gamestate, so they’re just fake placebos. This is why it’s curious to me that gamers by and large have completely accepted DLSS to the point that they’re actually completely okay with losing rasterization perf as long as a numbers in the corner of their screen is sufficiently faked.
This is not really how I think about things.

I think of idealist = different from current reality based on some principles. Often to me idealist also means that they wish things were different from the way they ended up on ideological grounds, but those grounds are incompatible with the current incentives/systems that led to the current state for some reason.

I don't really think the current system is neutral, more that is just is what exists today for some reasons, and that anything else proposed has to actually contend with those reasons/forces/incentives.
Cancer-fighting CAR-T cells could be made inside body with viral injection
> The jury was told that while he was on bail for hacking Nvidia and BT/EE and in police protection at a Travelodge hotel, he continued hacking and carried out his most infamous hack.

>Despite having his laptop confiscated, Kurtaj managed to breach Rockstar, the company behind GTA, using an Amazon Firestick, his hotel TV and a mobile phone.

This sounds too fantastical to be true.

This guy is obviously brilliant, disappointing that he squandered his opportunities.
Dec 12 Incident Update: Secrets and Repl.co Static Hosting Unavailable
Agreed. I think their current performance is super impressive. I think it's possible to get even better and beat humans by lowering the number of not-at-fault incidents too (although there are only so many variables in Waymo's control).

As another commenter mentioned, the fact that the Waymo detected that a vehicle was approaching it from behind at high speed and tried to accelerate to get out of the way is super impressive, and I'm not sure even most good human drivers would have been able to do that.
Courts aren't moral entities, they're legal ones. This person went out of their way to put a completely unnecessary legal target on their back. This is absolutely 100% a stupid prizes scenario.

I love fan creation and believe it should be enshrined properly in fair use doctrine, but god damn, I cannot imagine being stupid enough to make fan work of an IP and then sue the IP holder because I think they took my idea. Holy fuck.
Even though Cisco acquires them, I believe this is not going to be a "RIP" story — Cilium is a graduated CNCF project, adopted by all major cloud providers, used by many fortune 100 companies, and have a rich/diverse contributors community. Plus the team at Isovalent is super strong, and eBPF powerhouse, they are going to continue working on Cilium, Tetragon, and other eBPF projects. And they've build a strong and vibrant OSS community. Cisco did a really smart and strategic move to lead a modernization of networking and security.
Article isn't actually about busiest bridges (though that's the article headline. It's actually about bridges in metro areas that need maintenance.

This isn't the poster's fault - it's the headline writer's fault for an off-topic headline.
Intel didn't just miss by a little, they missed by a lot. Nvidia has more software engineers than hardware engineers. Building the software ecosystem is the thing that makes the whole thing work. Intel didn't just have the wrong product with Phi, they had a product with no ecosystem. It was impossible to develop for. None of Nvidia's competitors have a serious answer to the ecosystem problem. Its not clear that Intel has even ever understood this.
The headline glosses over "The court heard that Kurtaj had been violent while in custody with dozens of reports of injury or property damage."
the ceo has driven a unique culture as seen in his recent interviews. some of these run counter to prevailing business wisdom: long term projects, hard problems that could build platforms/markets vs easy problems that gain market share
etc..
> Maybe they want to argue the software is safe, but that doesn't change the fact that I'd still be scared of getting into that car.

Why this car, and not all cars? If I fail to assume control of my steering wheel, I will also crash.
Lol this is funny because many years ago I owned one of the largest viral sites that got billions of visits per year, and then sold it, before clickbait became popular, during its rise, and then during its fall.

In fact I've written tools in the past to analyze virility of headlines (around ~20,000 of them)

This is all beside the point... because my original comment wasn't about trying to go viral and get views.. that is easy. It was not being extremely fucking unoriginal.
It's redundancy. Yes, the doctor will check all this prior to prescription, but doctors can and will make mistakes. Having a secondary layer checking as well is going to save a whole lot of lives.
We have evidence antiviral existence exists. We have evidence antimicrobial resistance stems from overuse and incomplete courses of the medications. We have evidence that easy access leads to more usage of these agents. I provided specific evidence of France's antimicrobial consumption being higher than the rest of Europe.

What evidence would you accept? Is there evidence you'd like to highlight in the other direction?
I get space. What I'm saying is that, assuming we can even hit it, any such rock is moving with too much momentum to be able to change its course. Given any tech that we have. It's easy to underestimate the energy represented by a large asteroid.
meanwhile they've pillaged the music industry on their way to not make any money off it
Obviously the degree of caution necessary depends on the nature of the problems you're solving. But your typical consumer app doesn't need the same degree of caution as aerospace, and using a broad brush to say "everyone must be as risk-adverse as the most risk-adverse company" isn't a great approach.
Zero interest. BTDT (php). Static analysis, local testing, refactors, bulk changes delivered atomically (transactions, if you will) are missing critical features with this type of pattern. Great for hacking around, but not for making something stable.
> Often I see “moving roadblocks”: clumps of cars going around or just under the speed limit jockeying around each other, impeding other traffic from moving around them.

Indeed - this is the 70mph is slower than 50mph thing I mention.
You’re thinking of the Bayer pattern for sensors, which have four equal RGGB squares. When an RGGB pattern is used for displays, the more numerous green subpixels need to be smaller to maintain the correct white balance, resulting in the same 1+1+4 power profile.
Elk client for Mastodon is in Preview mode
You know, that is a good point. Far be it from me to encourage Apple to do more attestation -- to be clear, UX problems aside I don't want a centralized identity management service.

However, from Apple's perspective, this does kind of feel like the worst of both worlds. People have to update their devices to the most recent iOS version, apparently being signed in on an old device just turns off verification, apparently it's not even per-device?

So if that's the case, Apple has all of the downsides of attestation right now. Why also have the downsides for keys and in-band verification as well. It does seem like it would be simpler for them to try and have this be something that's tied into iCloud that gets set up only by the person who wants to be verified. Again, I'm not saying I want that, I don't want Apple arbitrating identities, but... why wouldn't they? Why have a system with both downsides?

I'm sure there are caveats I'm not thinking of, but it does seem like they could probably do this in a less federated/decentralized manner?
now do nytimes. Not sure how it compares to sirius but its one of the most ridiculous process i've personally experienced
By having a 'loop' in the process, anything that is incompletely burned and results in dioxins (and anything with a boiling point under ~1500C, which cannot be vitrified) will end up not passing the fractional distillation stage and will be put back into the start of the process to have a 2nd go at breaking down.
> not python

Pandas has a global option to turn on copy-on-write.

https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/dev/user_guide/copy_on_write....
Wild! I am working on exactly the same thing now for Lunar (https://lunar.fyi), and I'm also calling it Night Mode ^_^ what a coincidence

I've been trying to make "white regions in dark backgrounds" less painful for months, but doing that at the system level on macOS is incredibly hard. I see you're doing it with CSS filters, which make sense in the limited scope of an article. But applying something like that on the whole macOS UI would cause confusion.

I already use something similar on the iPhone: I read on the Kindle app which has white text on black background, then I have a full red Color Tint filter on the Triple Back Tap shortcut which I use before reading. Very similar effect to your solution, although I don't have images in my books.
Ah sorry. I thought he meant on city roads. You are right. I've seen them on the freeways but never fully autonomous.
I'm surprised someone hasn't started a "Warehouse POBOX" style address location where you can just maintain like a 5 dollar address as long as you complete appropiate paperwork.

Obviously, that'd be abused, but man, all these lawless corporations acting with impunity to common decent regulation enforcement makes some aweful work for no particular value to society.
> The reason Mantine is free is because the maintainer is not doing it for quick bucks.

Over time I've found that lack of monetization eventually leads to maintainers leaving the project. Paying money feels like a way to guarantee (to a degree) that the maintainer won't drop the project when their attention turns elsewhere.
Hah I went through this last year. I canceled Sirius/XM with an agent over chat. Basically you just need to paste: "no thanks, I would just like to cancel my account" to everything they say. After about 10 times they will actually do it.
In fairness I was answering the question of where you can get market rates. Very little of TX's grid failures in February 2021 directly affected the infrastructure to the homes, many Texas providers cut power because they could not afford the wholesale rates while offering the customers a protected monthly rate. There was a very good chance that if your provider was one of the TX providers that allowed you access to Texas's energy market, you maintained power during the freeze and paid massively for that.
Out of interest, what would happen if you didn't have proof of purchase or if, somehow, one day in the future Apple ceased to exist and enrollment became impossible?

Would the computer be "bricked" by this or could you wipe it and install a fresh copy of MacOS?
Chrome Cast. There is no OS-level service for it to introspect the network looking for screens to cast to, so each app has to drop in a SDK - which then has to have permission to search the local network looking for screens.

This was improved in recent iOS, but I never count on Google updating their SDKs to take advantage of iOS features on any sort of schedule. Even when they do, it will require third party apps to individually update as well.
This does not make sense. If spending is much higher for a similar number of people, then spending per capita will be higher by the same factor. Normalising per block of 300M people or per person is exactly the same, that’s not misleading at all.

The headline says exactly what it seems to say. It does not imply any normalisation per capita.
> Kurtaj managed to breach Rockstar, the company behind GTA, using an Amazon Firestick, his hotel TV and a mobile phone.

That's quite a feat.

> Rockstar Games alone told the court that the hack cost it $5m to recover from plus thousands of hours of staff time.

Either the kid is a genius or Rockstar really don't value their security much. Or maybe a bit of both?
if you adopt LoC as productivity metric then this is what you will get:

first 6 months: more LoC => more features
next 6 months: more LoC => less features
next 6 months: more LoC => 1 feature
next 6 months: more LoC => some existing features not working well

and so on

because a new feature is not only adding code but changing code.

and the more code you have the more you have to change it.
I don't think there's anything 'unfair' about your price, it's just something I don't want to have to think about yearly for a shell/terminal. One possible workaround is longer term licenses (especially promotionally to early adopters) or a different paid upgrade cadence.

I think the fundamental problem to me is similar to that expressed by some of the other commenters - a vague sense of unease with using a closed source shell/terminal combo. That's much harder to overcome than paying for a shell/terminal combo. Of course, getting reasonably compensated for open source work is an even trickier problem.
Others have pointed this out but it’s possible (or likely) that the biggest harm is just the diluting of the truth so no one believes anything.

When someone sees or hears something they don’t want to see or hear (against their political outlook), they will now have plausible deniability that it’s just bogus evidence and will dismiss it.
Others explained it, has less to do with age, and more whether you are (were) a PC gamer.

Crysis came out to huge fanfare due to it's impressive graphics. However even the highest end spec'd PC's had trouble running the game at a stable frame rate at high settings--iirc because the game's engine (cryengine?) was not well optimized.

Crysis performance became a benchmark for PC's, and then the joke phrase "But can it run Crysis" started, used seriously when discussing PC hardward specs, and jokingly used for unrelated hardware "This printer has 24bit color?" "But can it run Crysis?"
As of 2 years ago, which saw similar “the drivers are fine now and have been for a couple generations”, they are anecdotally not okay.

Way more crashes. Way more weird bullshit (like audio disappearing????) that just doesn’t happen when you run an Nvidia card.

“AMD drivers are fine now” has lost all meaning. I will continue to give them a chance now and again, but it’s based on keeping competitive up, not on the drivers being good now.
Although more lines _might_ situationally be better if it means the difference between a very clever but confusing one-liner versus a more verbose but comprehensible handful of lines. So like many things in engineering... it depends.
Why can't the phone number be unique? I have a unique phone number and trust them as my email unless I transfer myself out of my country.
Using AI to pinpoint hidden sources of clean energy underground
On the other hand, there's no evidence this stuff isn't influencing elections either, is there? It's happening, and people are believing it, so I'd say it's almost self-evident that it's influencing elections.

People usually expect politics to have decisive, iconic moments like Napoleonic battles. And possibly that was true, back in Napoleonic times. But modern politics is much more like modern warfare, which is nuanced and messy and complex. We don't and can't currently track the factors that lead to someone casting their single vote in a particular way (or at all), but we still need to recognize that they are myriad and complex reasons (in the case of someone who can be swayed... many of us are going to vote one way or another virtually regardless of what happens).
Cool idea.

You'll need to a) call Congress to change the law and/or b) fight that out in court against a TON of precedents.
Ammonia.
Yup, and I'd expect that for an election year there will be a lot more. Even if none of it is directly sponsored by a candidate, supporters will likely create deepfake content, and it will be believable to some percentage of people.
I don’t know, it’s too big a story. As soon as any tech journalist became “in the know“ there would be a very strong chance that it would become news anyway.

It certainly would’ve lasted longer than putting out a press announcement though.
Who cares about approach? Consumers only care if the product works or not. They haven't made it work and don't look like they will make it work.

You don't get brownie points if you deliberately hamstring yourselves (no sensors, no maps) and make the problem harder than it already is. It's like trying to jump higher and higher to fly to moon instead of using rockets. It doesn't mean you're tackling a fundamentally harder problem.
It concluded that Lapsus$ "made clear just how easy it was for its members (juveniles, in some instances) to infiltrate well-defended organisations".

To me, that sounds more like they were not well-defended ...
With the advent of microservices, it has exacerbated the situation where many dev shops only build, unit test their own little service and call it a day without verifying the end to end functionality -- the "works in my microservice" effect.

You can see the effect in many large SaaS/tech products in the form of latency in the double digits to forever looping redirects of their service to Narnia and back.
Doesn't even need a crooked reporter, just a troll/extremist/propoganda creator and a news organisation without much interest in fact checking/research.

In fact, forget deepfakes and disinformation campaigns. What should truly terrify people is how low the standards are for sourcing information in many media publications now. Oh sure, you could use AI to fake a video of Biden or Trump saying something controversial and send that in... or you could print out a document titled 'Trump's Super Secret Plan for World Domination!', take a photo of it on a mobile phone and send that into many outlets for much the same effect.
It's not even a good investment https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-10-15/the-econo...
It's not an anti-trust violation to patch holes in a closed API.
Really? He strikes me as professionally wrong. I still find some of his stuff interesting because it challenges my own perspective, but man… he's an expert at stretching a Tweet-length thought to 5,000 words.
>Depends on the size of the tree branch.

Our thinking fast reflexes are to pretty much avoid any obstacle whether living or dead. Hopefully our thinking slow brain has time to do a proper evaluation before doing anything drastic.
Okay, fair, that's a lot better then. Still not ideal, but... yeah, my guess would be then that maybe people mostly do live verification.

I don't know, we'll see what happens. Maybe I'll be wrong and the system will take off.
Intel sure gave up. Intel for AI chips is what IBM is for operating systems.
Aren't medical records more protected because of HIPAA?
Thank you for this. I realize this suggestion fits the context of the thread, but I am currently self employed so I would love another suggestion that isn’t necessarily geared toward integrating with employer match programs.
Save the sale.
This is exactly why I place SiriusXM on a virtual credit card and a throw away email. I sign up for $6 per month SiriusXM promo with a $7 per month ceiling on the virtual card. When the 7th or 8th month comes around and the offer expires they have the audacity to charge $22+ for this content. The overcharge is caught and they don't get my money, and I'm happy to receive the disconnect signal.
> The world did not collapse.

This is an extremely poor metric. (The worst possible metric?)

Did bad things happen due to deception? Yes, actually, they did. Read history!
I think there's probably a few things at play here.

Here in UK tech workers don't earn anywhere near what their US counterparts do. A senior programmer might be paid 50-100k depending on the company, but it's very rare to cross that level(and once you do, you start losing state benefits related to child care and paying higher and higher levels of tax). "Tech workers" definitely don't have 6-bed houses and drive massive SUVs here, at best they enjoy relaxed "upper middle class" lifestyle - newish 4 bed house on a modern estate, 2 leased cars, swimming in mortgage payments and other debt. They aren't struggling but they aren't so comfortable to have 6 kids and pay for all of their childcare costs - because everyone knows that doing so would just erase those great salaries and would most likely mean a step down in the quality of life. They will earn more than teachers, but like 2-3x as much, not 10x as much.

Then most tech workers I know have had to move for their jobs - so they don't have immediate support of family, grandparents etc - so having more kids means more daily responsibilities and more daily costs for childcare. In contrast the other people I mentioned all live close to their families - so having 3 kids is not a big deal because half the time grandma is over and helps out. Like, for us we pay more in childcare(just for one child!) than what our mortgage is per month, partially because we don't have any family around us to help.

These are my observations anyway, anecdotes - take them as just that.
Not sure why this is being downvoted, I agree that the privacy implications you called out are very serious, and I’m glad you’ve changed your mind and come to the conclusions you did. Thanks for posting about it, and sorry some people are being rude about it. I’m hearing there are a lot of people who were pro-life but didn’t ever expect Row-v-Wade to actually overturn, and now that they are seeing the real-world implications of that, are realizing it’s not a good idea to have dogmatic blanket bans. I heard a podcast about how Idaho’s in crisis because they’ve lost a bunch of their already very small number of obstetricians, because they’re now suspect and legally liable anytime a baby dies, and now women who are having serious pregnancy complications are unable to get care, and are being forced to travel long distances right at the moment they need help.
An async function in Rust is a function that returns a future.
I've tried, but regular water sprays don't last as long, somehow.
It wants precise location — which I take to mean war-driving WiFi. GPS I am okay with for a map app.
You can store hydrogen underground. I don't think that would work as well with ammonia.