skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So much crab-bucket thinking. 90% of the right of way is dedicated to automobile traffic but because rental scooters occasionally get left on the remaining 10%, the problem is clearly the scooters and not the cars.
I don't have an opinion on how well GPT-4 is performing, but surely you see the irony in insisting that other people's perspective is just confirmation bias, while your own view is the objective truth?

There has to be a cognitive bias for this, but I can't find one that fits just right. It's similar to Egocentric Bias [0] or Self-serving Bias [1].

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egocentric_bias

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-serving_bias
This contains a decent summary, including some laws: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/10-years-after-snowden...

I'd mention there are two big but abstract consequences.

1) The leaks significantly harmed international relationships and the result of this game much more ammunition to political adversaries like China and Russia. People argue that this is a consequence of Snowden's leak but that's like arguing that a mass shooting was only problematic because the news informed everyone. In a way yes, but it's not like those people would be alive if the news didn't report... It's not the real problem even if you wanted to argue over-sensationalism.

2) It seriously galvanized the battle for encryption and laid the pathway for the subsequent rapid rise in usage of tools like Signal and more funding and energy for building tools like Matrix and many others. Google's Project Zero certainly was influenced by this event.

While I get that these are more abstract, they are certainly consequences and certainly nothing to be scoffed at. This is another problem with the perception of consequences, is that often they are more subtle or abstract. But subtle or abstract doesn't mean any less impactful, just more difficult to trace. More opaque. We don't have a counterfactual to prove that these things wouldn't have happened without the leaks, but I'm certain the timing and degree would have been different. Do you think the world would be different had he not released them? I don't think this is an easy question to answer because it requires being exceptionally detailed and paying very close attention to a lot of events.
How do I format an interlinear gloss for HTML? (2011)
Yet another reason I'd never buy a Kia. They really aren't even cheap anymore to be able to justify the reduced quality.

Fun fact - we have a Rohde and Schwarz spectrum analyzer (awesome tool, model FSH6) at work and my boss told me they called it the "two Kia tool" when they got it because brand new it cost the same as two Kia cars.
As much as I dislike many aspects of living in most of both Ohios (NE (which, to me, should be Cleveland/Akron/Canton/Kent/Youngstown/PGH/Buffalo),vs the rest of the state), I am super impressed with the leniency (latitude?) tolerated in that place re: "academic freedoms," while not going [dipshit] (ok, I cannot describe or conceive of a more comprehensive term, my bad, my apologies).
> what benefit does he expect for applying on it's behalf

Publicity. And as you see he is getting it.
Yes, all those nasty wheelchair users who need to use the sidewalk to get around. How dare they interfere with your ability to dump a scooter anywhere you please without thought or consequence. No one has ever had an issue with tents or needles or the homeless, either.
Terraform wants to be the only thing that owns a K8S object, but the way things work in reality is you have a dozen things that want to write back to this attribute, or that overwrite objects in other places, etc, and you're constantly fighting with TF about this or that triviality.
The business risks surrounding unpopular choices are generally strong enough to overwhelm the technical arguments. So why should a lead choose htmx? IMO only if the project was trivial enough to bring on such whimsical risk.
The title of that page is "Serving a JavaScript project built using Vite from GitHub Pages" - that's what those notes are meant to cover, the Vite part is a subset of what I learned in that particular TIL.

Thanks for the BASE_URL environment variable trick - that was very non-obvious to me! I found the documentation for that just now: https://vitejs.dev/guide/env-and-mode

I'm not sure what you mean by "trim down" those notes - if anything I'm always looking for ways to bulk this kind of document up, in order to capture as many of the details of how things work as possible.

I tried the script/x pattern for a bit but I've found that Justfiles fit my brain better - I have a TIL about those here: https://til.simonwillison.net/django/just-with-django
This sounds so thoughtful compared to my experience trying to navigate procedures as someone abused Meta, Google, Telecoms and social media platforms simultaneously to generate harm. When multiple platforms are attacked at once, and someone is deliberately performing a psychological attack, you are looking for a quick one call solution. I could not find that when I checked and kept being routed to post the situation in an open forum space. Things have slowed down, will be good to check again. Because I was able to confirm an insider, I seem to have been experiencing a sentiment quite different from the organization’s goals. The only light at the end of this tunnel is reading these goals.
I dropped my privacy certs after I was tanked with death threats and social engineers. Motive specified was irrational and challenging/irregular to anyone’s common sense. It was hard to believe a company I trusted would not have a quick way to report and receive rapid response for safety issue as it was happening.

They followed an adversarial narrative to domestic violence training I received (that vanished from my home along with cyber security training for elders). Typing “I believe” in a mobile game amongst dropping personal health info, contacts, and voice data from as far back as 2007.

One of the guys manipulated my sister in a group home to extort me, and stated he should have known better than to mess with tweakers. He was generally confirmed to have at least Firebase identifiers and access now as I did legwork basically sitting with the attackers fighting back. None of this would be public if I could find fast simple help while I was being hit from multiple directions (including physical threats).

So while a Federal Policy is indeed a good aspiration, it needs to incorporate rapid response for overwhelming incidents.
My naive hope was just for the car to be a dumb second monitor, where the underlying standard just needs to have enough bandwidth and features like HDMI or Displayport, and then not need major changes for years and years despite the video out device evolving. Basic things like video out, audio out/in, night/day mode.
Thanks a lot for the suggestion! I had a look into Zettelkasten and Logseq, and I must say, it's been a game-changer for my note-taking process. The idea of not worrying too much about folder organization and just focusing on creating backlinks has made it so much more intuitive and enjoyable.

By the way, I was pleasantly surprised to find out that Logseq is open source! That's a fantastic bonus. Thanks again for pointing me in this direction – it's making a real difference for me.
I had LongCovid 14 months.

Korean Pine Needle pills made the most dramatic improvement, but there were a ton of supplements that helped along the way leading me to being cured of LongCovid over 2 years ago. I feel sorry for people who rely on doctors instead of methodical experimentation with supplements.

Doctors just gaslight and provide no solutions - it’s been over 3 years they’ve had patients like this and best they can do is say “maybe cells aren’t using energy as well” with this research. Modern medicine is a joke, it’s just a sick people bankrupting scheme… at least with herbs/supplements you have anecdotal evidence from others and a history of cultures safely using those herbs.
This was a satisfying article emphasizing the engineering ingenuity to build Apollo. I read the book awhile ago and remember a scene not mentioned in the article about when North American went to go make their formal pitch to NASA for the Apollo command module. When the arrived in the room they realized their slide projector had the wrong adapter for the outlet. Panicked they looked for a solution to no avail until someone had the idea to just cut the cord and stick the bare leads into the wall. Problem solved; and they won the contract. Fun book.
Code execution and RAG are not going to lock people in. They are 1000x easier to replicate than the model, which as you say, is already becoming a commodity.

My pet theory is that OpenAI are cooking high quality user data by empowering GPT with all these toys + human-in-the-loop. The purpose is to use this data as a sort of continual evaluation sifting for weak points and enhancing their fine-tuning datasets.

Every human response can carry positive or negative connotation. The model can use that as a reward signal. They claimed to have 100M users, times let's say 10K tokens per month makes 1T synthetic tokens. In a whole year they generate about as much text as the original dataset, 13T. And we know that LLMs can benefit a lot from synthetic data when it is filtered/engineered for quality.

So I think OpenAI's moat is the data they generate.
Can’t buyers decide for themselves the value of something?
Do you have citation on that it's gonna be switched on in a month? Have been curious about this
> you should do a locking read on that something else

How to do this tho? Do you mean like this?

BEGIN TRANSACTION

// all concerned rows in the select statement

SELECT * FROM A, B... FOR SHARE;

// update relevant rows

UPDATE A SET x = true ... FOR UPDATE;

COMMIT

END
> Right. He talks about hypothetical outcomes as if they have happened

No.

Cherry picking counter examples does not disprove the main point, which is describing a business model.
My Convoluted VRChat Google Meet Setup (2021)
Replying as a 60yo American living in the Western part of the US (ie. I'm about as Westerner as it gets, I suppose)...

> I claim that the West has forgotten what "home" means.

This I mostly agree with. The America I'm familiar with is quite rootless. In fact rootlessness was encouraged even ("you should be willing to move to a new/better job"). It goes all the way back to manifest destiny - always be on the move. There's a temporary feeling about everything. Most of our buildings aren't intended to last centuries - they're intended to be knocked down when something more profitable comes along and that might happen just be in a few years.

> Western culture has become empty and fake

I agree with this as well. Style over substance. Confidence is valued over competence.

> They really believe, they are part of something bigger, are very important and are going to be famous or something.

But this part I don't agree with. I think if anything Americans in 2023 would like to feel like they're part of something bigger but that feeling has been lost for quite a while now. There's no shared vision of what America should be at this point like there mostly was 40 or 50 years ago. That common vision has shattered into a million pieces especially over the last 10 years or so. We're the most isolated people on earth.

> There are things that have now become impossible in the West. Simply expressing unsatisfaction has become a danger for the status quo or the state.

I don't think you've been listening. There's plenty of expressed dissatisfaction - I just did above. Social media is rife with dissatisfaction.
I mean, they should default to an out of band error; these days, especially for something as high level as mapping, there's no good reason to need to fold "this is an error case" in with "this is a set of valid coordinates X"
I genuinely appreciate the link, but not so much the campaigning for the FDA or USA more broadly, which, my stance aside, feels like a trap leading to a fruitless discussion.
Placing the burden of proof on someone making a hard-to-verify claim seems reasonable
I only skimmed through the article so I might have missed this part, but did the author consider picking up a few books about domain design or search some examples how do others implement such event organizing systems?

Because based on what I read, that seems to be his problem. He started implementing a system without having a good understanding of the domain's inherent problems and their common solutions. Not everything needs to be re-invented.

Even though I have never worked in this domain (event organizing) but still I could from the top of my head pull out one such example where a team went into great detail how to design and implement an event organizing system which answers most of not all the problems that the author faced:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/msp-n-p/...
I personally don’t know any auto maker that has a good, or even just not noticeably bad, track record at making consumer software.

Considering that, I have no reason to believe they are even capable of producing a somewhat reliable average UX.

So I’m with the GP on this one.

But I may be wrong.
Even so, I think he underestimates the disruption the latest AI is going to have
> Changes to the platform or dependencies break working code

Not all code. You have platform dependent code and then code that doesn't depend on anything outside of your own code. The code with no outside dependencies can easily stay around unchanged for decades and is not a liability.

"All dependencies are liabilities" I could agree with. Dependencies are technical debt that will continue to demand interest from you, they are often worth it but they are the main source of maintenance burden. Some are unavoidable if you need to interface with an API, but many are not.
It’s not that difficult to tell when output for prompts (on a paid account) changes consistently from:

“I’ve understood and performed the task you’ve requested. Let me know if this comprehensive annotated output is correct and if there’s any additional modification you would like to make.”

to

“In order to do what you’ve requested, you will need to do and consider the following vague high-level steps in a numbered list. Feel free to ask me to do it, but I’m going to spend the next dozen responses apologizing for not following a simple, explicit, unambiguous instruction, saying I’ve corrected the mistake, then making the exact same mistake over and over until I give up and claim it’s too complicated while throwing Error Analyzing messages that don’t need to be shown to the user.”
I spent forever looking at various PDF parsing solutions like Unstructured, and eventually stumbled across GROBID, which was an absolute perfect fit since it's entirely made for scientific papers and has header/section level segmentation capabilities (splitting the paper into Abstract, Introduction, References, etc.) It's lightweight and fast too!
Fair enough.

By that logic though, most things the average person considers personal or sensitive can be discovered yet it’s generally considered good practice to not actively expose intimate aspects of our lives to the world. E.g., it’s relatively easy to find most folks’ home addresses yet most folks wouldn’t feel comfortable posting their home address on the internet, and if someone else does it, it’s considered doxxing.

Anyway, I was just curious. Thank you for answering.
Any plans for bioRxiv?
Can you provide more details on how a container can MITM other containers?

Does that also apply to Kubernetes workloads? And does that then require an encrypted service mesh (e.g. Linkerd) or TLS between services?
The price includes the rest of TailwindUI, not just the Catalyst Preview. Whether or not it's the correct value for money is of course up to you, but I've used it extensively.
Map of paraquat usage in the US: https://blogs.sas.com/content/graphicallyspeaking/2021/05/07...
Pretty much my thinking. You’ve just got an office but now you’re paying for it.
This is the classic Rolex fan. Sort of brainwashed and clueless while insulting to others. Both spring drives and grands are more accurate than Rolexes. Beyond that who even cares. If you want accuracy certainly don’t get a mechanical watch.
At least one ENPP1 blocker appears to be in clinical trials already: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05270213?term=RBS2418&ra.... It lists "advanced cancers" as being eligible.

I'm most interested in head and neck cancers, and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) is only effective in 20 - 30% of patients; see e.g. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.21.02198: "In the phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study of pembrolizumab monotherapy in R/M HNSCC (N = 192), objective response rate (ORR) was higher in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 than CPS < 1 (21% v 6%; one-sided P = .023)."

A lot of oncologists I've talked to also think PD-L1 expression is overrated as a marker of pembro effectiveness; obviously there's something going on, with higher PD-L1 expression being net better in terms of pembro utility overall, but the data are noisy and lots of exceptions abound. I'm also not sure how reliable PD-L1 expression tests are. My tumor was tested once by a well-known-in-the-field company called CARIS, and it showed a 20% Combined Positive Score (CPS). Another test done by the Mayo Clinic showed a 5% score. Who's right? Who knows. No one I've talked to. The attitude seems to be that no one is convinced the PD-L1 tests are highly accurate, and that once the CPS is above 1%, pembro's effectiveness is a crapshoot anyway. I got five doses of pembro and failed it, utterly.
Which hard-to-verify claim, though?

It's common knowledge that OpenAI is constantly tweaking things, so it's not exactly outlandish to suggest that those tweaks may have made some queries harder, and it's equally hard to verify that nothing has changed.

I'm perfectly okay with saying "YMMV", but that's not how OP responded.
I rent a car 6 times a year so I’m not a heavy renter but car play has been out for a while so I have seen a lot of different implementations over the years. I love it! I dread if I ever get a rental without it. I never have to use the interface of the car. I have the same consistent fully integrated experience everywhere I go.
I'm intrigued, what kind of products do they design in Blender?
It’s not obvious to me.
When I walk my dogs around the neighborhood I can count more cars blocking the sidewalk than scooters.
In the same way I used to use Internet search.

But now instead of wading through miles of junk to get to some potentially wrong answer I get straight to a potentially wrong answer.

Not wading through the SEO muck makes it all worth while. I pay OpenAI for the privilege.
Yes! I'll set up talk2biorxiv.org very soon as it would be simple to port over. I also plan on making the underlying research PDF RAG framework available as an independent module
You're getting at the root of the problem here, which is that Visa doesn't actually support anything like that and "whatever" is going to add another grubby middle man to the transaction, which is the thing that most needs to be prevented.

You're fundamentally trying to transfer your money to the operator of the charger, but they aren't standing around to give cash to, so you want something digital. Alright, so your bank should do this -- you authorize your car's private key to make withdrawals from your bank account at charging points and we're all set. Except that banks suck at this sort of thing, which is why we have the credit/debit network to create some kind of standard. Except the standard is credit cards, not public key cryptography.

You wanted to give your money to the charging point operator but instead you have to give it to your bank to give it to Visa to give it to the charging point operator. Now we're going to add "Tesla/whatever" to the chain? This needs to stop. You stick with the card reader until you figure out how to get banks, using some kind of standard, to support the public/private key thing and we can remove a middle man instead of adding one.
Have these folks done any sort of actual audit on the Android code base to ensure they’ve removed _all_ of the “phoning home”? Not so much doubting their claims, more so just curious to see what they found. Is it possible google has baked in some tracking features deep in the OS, outside of gapps? Things you wouldn’t see with a mitm proxy? I’d be interested to know
Disposable income is not down (except from the pandemic). It's near an all-time high, like the economy in general. https://www.statista.com/statistics/710215/us-disposable-inc...

If skating rinks are going away I would bet they are being replaced by entertainment for people with _more_ disposable income, like trampoline parks. It's a rich country.
How are you guys fine tuning?
You are welcome to do it for free. The entire point of an UI library is to save time.. you can technically build anything you want for free if you don't value your time.

This UI library sped up my dev time at least two-fold. The components and sample landing pages provided are really great IMO (and judging by their sales, it's not just me who agrees).
Psst, the math joke here is that "the point at infinity" is literally the mathematicians version of folding in "this is an error case" with "valid coordinates". The "error case" in question being division by zero. Turns out there is good reason to do it, because it means the co-ordinate is always defined.
and RF components are still in that space to a greater or lesser extent too.
Chatbot Arena - a crowdsourced, randomized battle platform using 130K+ user votes to compute Elo ratings. This is a bit more reliable than the usual benchmarks, but slightly out of date because it needs to accumulate "battles" to rank new models.

https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboar...
Only if you ask it for a polymorphic or androgynous virus.
Ronald Dahl and George Bernard Shaw wrote in sheds.
https://www.thehistorypress.co.uk/articles/from-roald-dahl-t...
My understanding with Radix UI was that it’s a headless UI library. Looking at it again, it seems that has changed.

Is this recent?
>the fact that you're not allowed to access the basic necessities of life if you don't allow yourself to be exploited for profit.

This is the underpinning of capitalism. Some people speculate that denying basic necessities is the only way to ensure that common people will be productive enough to make the wealthy people wealthier.
You raise an excellent point.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764160/

It’s utter insanity:

> EPA says too many pesticide formulas exist to check all for the safety of ingredients that could harm humans, plants and wildlife

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/oct/09/epa-cfs-...
I would expect something labeled as $149 as supposed to be finished.
Anecdotally it’s still fine at enterprise-y stuff (e.g. corporate law), worse at day-to-day stuff and history, and way worse at medical stuff. Honestly with the amount of scolding it does I don’t think it’s that healthy for kids.
> every piece of existing code constrains future development

If that were literally true, then every new development would rationally necessitate a total rewrite of the codebase.

You might have meant that parts of the existing codebase would need to be changed to adapt to the new development, but as long as you've made a rational decision to keep using parts of the existing codebase, it must have been a net positive otherwise you'd just throw it all away.
You over sell things because it then sells for way more than the proper "impressive tooling" would ever allow
I understand what you’re trying to say with this analogy, but even gold bars have related costs, known as the cost of carry.
Couldn't you just make a dedicated account for that device? Wouldn't that be preferable anyway? You could still use family controls.
For translation, you're probably better off with a model that's specifically designed for translation, like MADLAD-400 or DeepL's services.