skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As a PC user you’ll have to get used to the extra control key which comes in addition to command and option.
Please take 30 seconds and imagine a world with 0% apartment vacancy and get back to us.

lol.
> Why should ATC at a busy airport be so accommodating?

Apropos of the other issues already being well debated:

1. ATCs role is to facilitate use of the airport.

2. They/the airport are being paid by Lufthansa to do so:

~$4,000 landing fee based on the OEW + 5% fuel being 340,000lb at $9.11/1000 lb.

~$800 for up to 8 hours at a gate (or a flat rate of $36,000/mo per aircraft for a frequently visiting ship).

~$1,000 for common use of terminal facilities (for airlines that don't have dedicated terminals - often with internationals, where they have the common check in area that is used by multiple airlines).

And that's not all the charges the airline gets from the airport, that's just the majority of the charges for "1 aircraft, 1 landing/departure" at SFO.
Oh PHP programmers would just rely on MySQL's groupBy, we both know it! :P
It did give a sense of 3D back then when the character is moving fast with a lot of obstruction objects (walls and trees) passing by. Some rendering also gave better lightning effects AFAIR.
I think pair programming is way better remote, when you can share screens.
The most egregious broken window fallacy I’ve heard is a vc claiming that cryptocurrency lets you “virtually” transfer energy from areas with low prices to areas with high prices (without power lines!).
> It means that Google has the capability to modify application code

The Play Store has system signature, so it could already do that. The mitigation is on the user's side to disable the Play Store, which is where it has always been.

> It might also be seen as anticompetitive, in the sense that Google is the only entity which can manage its own keys

Only if they distribute through the Play Store. The whole point of the recent lawsuit is to make it easier for anybody else to distribute apps under their own control.
For reference, keyBy returns an object with the same keys as groupBy, but the value of a key is the last element to produce that key, instead of an array of all of the elements that did.
LoL the government trolls are here in force, as well.
Chill out Dylan
Pretty much all UART receivers I know of perform either 16x or 8x sampling to figure out where the start and end of bit-transitions are located. This is the clock-recovery mechanism.

You need to discover the edges of the clock, and make sure you read _AWAY_ from those edges. The bits are not well defined on the clock edges. Even with a 100% accurate clock, if you're reading on the edges you'll be very unreliable.

UARTs aim to read on the "center" of bits. (If there are 16x reads per bit, then the "center" is on reads 7, 8, and 9). You'll want to stay away from reading on timeslot#1 or timeslot#16.
The originals don't have to be destroyed; perhaps these private organizations who are so interested in preserving them can pony up the cash to store them. Why should taxpayers be footing this bill?
That’s an interesting take when the stated purpose of that proposal is “to enable developers to run programs written in TypeScript, Flow, and other static typing supersets of JavaScript without any need for transpilation”.

That seems like a fine goal. Allow runtimes to execute JS with type annotations as-is.
Figma Dev Mode
Yup, that's how it works, but you unfortunately can't retrofit out-of-spec devices like the author's to be within spec at scale.
Your perspective is valuable. But most homeless people are homeless under a year. Money solves many of their problems.
What's the thinking behind attaching Object.groupBy to the Object constructor? With the other Object.X() functions I can easily see why it makes sense they exist on the Object constructor, because they generally follow the pattern of taking an object as argument, and say, freezes that object, returns that object's [[Prototype]], returns that object's keys, check if that object is sealed, etc. By contrast, Object.groupBy is a utility function that takes an iterable and a callback, and doesn't seem to have anything distinctively to do with "Object" per se.

(I guess one exception is Object.is, which takes two values as arguments. But even Object.is makes a lot of sense existing on the Object constructor because it exposes an important abstract operation (SameValue). Object.groupBy is only a utility function)
I play video games, watch football games (LFC fan). I read quite a lot as well.
"Cross-platform" but works only with MacOS and Linux, you should change the wording until it is cross-platform.
> It is that we suppress the construction of housing through to byzantine permitting, incredibly harsh zoning, vetocracy, and overburdening regulation.

This isn't the cause everywhere. There are absolutely places that don't have such overbearing regulations but still have a serious housing shortage.
at least edit your post to mention what country.
That would be "alleged" practical concerns, IMO.

I’m not convinced that archival quality digital storage would be any cheaper than paper storage, and would likely be substantially more expensive in the long run.
> I wonder why they [BLM rioters] are otherwise organized and have leadership and full approval of the party which is currently in power?

I don't think you can support that contention with, y'know, evidence. Keep in mind that some — not all — of the so-called BLM arson incidents were later found to have been done as false-flag operations by far-right extremist types [0] or as plain old insurance fraud. [1]

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/23/texas-boogaloo...

[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/minnesota-trump-support...
If you consider what actually deters construction/building rates, there's no reason to believe that capital "moved elsewhere" (appropriated by some abstract entity / people) would translate to more housing.

Supposing everyone had more money in their hands (all else remaining equal), that would just be reflected in the market. Houses would increase in cost. Now you're where you started.

Housing supply is just too inelastic in most US cities.
I personally would feel a great deal of guilt if I purchased a second home in my city, knowing that there are thousands of people who would kill for the opportunity.

To me, it is indeed greed. Some things are more sacred than money and housing is one of those things
> Look at the Miami skyline at 7-9pm, when people should be getting home. Half the condos with no lights on.
> We have a wealth inequality problem, symptoms include housing shortages.

Nope. The problem having a investment growth picture so bad that real estate starts to look good as a haven.
CPU cycles are so cheap these days that this is a gross waste of manpower.

Even better than manually written unit tests are automatically generated property-based tests (which can be unit or integration tests). One can literally run millions of tests in a day this way, far, FAR more than could ever be manually verified. All because computation is so darned cheap now.
Nope. If you pay enough, new labour supply opens up - people put off retirement, or work more hours, or.... But no matter how much you pay you can't build more houses anywhere useful.
> We don’t require an email, login, or payment to use our terminal (it is free as in speech and as in beer).

This excites me. I was excited to try a new terminal last week and I had to sign up. I wouldn't do that, so I went back to the default macOS one. I'll give Wave Term a try!

It's clear you have put a lot of thought into the product and its delivery after reading your message above -- it is noted and appreciated!
If there’s four slices of pizza in front of you and there’s a person sitting across from you, you’d be incentivized to take all four of the slices. Doing so would be greedy. Not being greedy is making sure the other person gets what they need before you take the rest.

I can surely blame people for taking what’s in front of them when people who are also in front of them have nothing.
You ClojureScript people seem to be stalking me :-D

I've wanted to learn Clojure for years but haven't found the right reason, until discovering Logseq. Such a cool language!
I think getting it down to a small minority would already be great progress!

Not sure getting it down to zero is the right or primary goal though. It sounds like an excellent way to require ever larger budgets and fund some pork machine.

Let's first get it down, then worry about going to zero. Has anyone ever managed zero? At what cost?
Which country? I believe it's regulated by law of the country
Not at all. Greed requires selfishness.

If you're presented with abundance, everyone is taking a similar share and there isn't counterpressure from your peers (e.g., laws that we vote for), then there is no selfishness and thus no greed. To define greed you need a feedback loop.

We're simple dumb animals. We take what's available. If you want to talk about defining arbitrary limits on consumption that are disconnected from circumstances then you're basically out here preaching religion.
Did you really call your company "Command Line Inc."? That's awesome!
That is satire, right? We can discuss more/better automation and tooling aids and planning aids and whatever tech.. there are so many options you can bring in there before even thinking of any $+#(&#&$ AI in safety critical things?! Exploring what, the many ways it could hilariously fail?
> Elon didn't throw a tantrum.

> He didn't throw himself at the floor screaming like a child.

> I don't recall he ever did that.

He specifically exclaimed "Fuck it, I don't care, we'll pay the fines" rather than having that adornment in the vehicle. Just because your literalism says that it's not, because there were no mashed fists against the floor, doesn't make it less so, particularly when the definition of tantrum is around outbursts of anger, often immaturely.

> But if autopilot wasn't taken off the shelves and it just behaves differently, then you're stretching the meaning of "recall" to a philosophical extreme.

Also, then I guess two of my Audi recalls weren't actually recalls either. One involved updating the software for the 'passenger occupancy detection system'. A USB stick was plugged into the car. It didn't happen OTA, but nothing was touched or removed or installed on the vehicle. But I'm sure that would somehow be a recall still.

Mechanism. Intent. Two separate things.
Apartments aren't the only dense housing solution. Townhomes, repurposed warehouses, etc are excellent solutions. My favorite place I lived every was a townhome in a community of about 100 homes. It was a special 50/50 community where 50% were tax credit and the other 50% were privately-owned (I rented a privately owned townhome). They all looked the same so there was no stigma as to who had section 8 and who didn't, and the community was kept up very well.

$1,200/month for 3bd/2.5ba, 1,200sqft with hardwood flooring and free off-street assigned parking 15 minutes from the city. Lived there 3 years and moved out in 2018, loved it. Now I pay $1,200/month to live a 600sqft studio apartment behind a Costco an hour from the city.

To this day I don't understand why this style of housing isn't more popular.
It didn't appear constructive, just implying that they were going to do their best to lose the email.

Here in the UK it's quite easy to get stuff fixed. A few years ago, a single complaint to trading standards by me got a can relabelled properly with its ingredients. Failing that, I know from prior experience that companies hate being embarrassed. They really value their image, and risking house fires for your consumers, it doesn't go down well.

What you posted came across as negative, and I'm afraid I have a fairly low tolerance for that. If I misread you, sorry.
It's kind of interesting you're saying the same thing as each other.

If money were in the hands of people who want houses built in cities instead of on beaches, there'd be more houses in cities and fewer on beaches.
This is irrelevant. Homes are depreciating assets. The only reason that finance got involved is that we are building way to few relative to demand. Remove the extreme market distortion and finance has nothing to push against.
There is already legislation about acceleration, it falls under e.g. 'exhibition of speed' and everyone one of these modern EVs is able to violate it (and do regularly, afaict).
Whether those numbers are true, malware on Android can generally do a lot less damage than on other systems (first of all because Android is not used for servers and workstations).
Are you suggesting a specific policy?
Declaring a fuel emergency doesn’t mean that they have run out of fuel, or that they will run out of fuel soon. It means that if even they diverted to their alternate right now, they would expect to go below their reserve fuel level before they could land. The reserve fuel level is there to give them an extra half hour or more of flight time. Absent some mechanical problem with the engines, or a fuel leak, declaring a fuel emergency would mean that the pilots waited too long at their destination airport before thinking about diverting. You’re supposed to simply divert _before_ you would need to declare an emergency, rather than declare an emergency simply in order to skip ahead in line.

There was no risk of a crash in this circumstance, because the plane still had plenty of fuel to divert to their alternate and land before going into their final reserve.
I don't think so, it’s just a polarising ecosystem. I worked in the .net for over 12 years and im so happy to be out. There’s nothing they could add to their language or tooling to entice me back.
Renter here, and we have a huge problem with housing up here as well. However, I don’t understand why would any level of the government would want to act in any way that can significantly decrease housing prices. Super-majority of people own their homes, why would they ever support a government that would be willing to hurt their own investment? Admittedly, I don’t have a solution here, and I understand how it hurts us especially long term. Convincing people to act against their self-interest is also not easy.

Even my friends who have been on “housing prices have to drop” camp jumped across the fence once they got their own place. Obviously, this wouldn’t be the case if we didn’t look at housing as an investment, but here we are.
Just a clarifier for everyone - a fuel emergency is not what you think it is. They don’t run until the last drop. While it indicates the aircraft should be handled without delay, it’s also not going to fall out of the sky immediately either.

A fuel emergency would never be severe enough that they would be forced to land at SFO in this situation. In fact, if they were truly forced to land the pilots would lose their jobs because they left it way too late. Oakland was always a reasonable option.

Finally, fuel emergencies are not actually a standard call. It is a thing that is adhered to in the industry as courtesy. Unless there is a malfunction with the fuel system (which would be a mayday call) then it is mostly avoidable.
Happened the instant male streamers/subjects were involved. Typical double standard.
> it's because it's de facto illegal to build new homes anywhere they would be useful, at any price.

This is simply false when stated as an absolute. It may be true in some areas, but not in most of the ones I'm familiar with.
What about Object.fromEntries?

See https://github.com/tc39/proposal-array-grouping for why this isn’t a method on Array.prototype.
Almost agree with you - but I would put that at 90%. The short-term rentals, and rentals in general are definitely part of the problem.

I strongly believe, that we should help people buy their first home and increasingly tax the second, third etc. In several developed countries, it's very lucrative for rich / upper middle class people to use their credit capability to just buy another house and rent it out - with tax incentives and deduction, it basically pays for itself over time. While the young renter who is living in it, do not have this possibility.
You remind me of two things I have read here at hacker News in the last few months:
1. We have made substantial gains in productivity over the last few decades in many areas, but not in construction. The leading candidate for the cause is that we have increased regulations to keep things stable.

2. A private company in San Francisco was going to buy a downtown office building and converted into housing, hoping that even though that is incredibly expensive there would be enough demand. But then they realized that San Francisco had mandated a large percentage of new multifamily housing units must support low rent tenants and it made the whole project completely infeasible.
Pilots are not going to be accustomized of visual landings in case of emergency, if you have a corporate policy that forbids them in controlled setting!

This one is bizzare, not only European pilots on average have less experience than US ones, but they are not allowed to gain experience by corporate policy.

(This one coming from a country where aviation is a big mess)
How is throttling the New York Times on X anti-free speech? NYT is its own media platform, among the most powerful in the world, why should it expect a separate outlet to promote it? Further, as a powerful media outlet, the Times itself "throttles" all kinds of voices and opinions with which its editorial board and majority of its employees and readers don't agree.
> Most likely uninstallable without rooting the device.

You can disable them without rooting your device. I just verified.
This is very nice! Another person explaining this stuff is "10 Minute Physics"

https://matthias-research.github.io/pages/tenMinutePhysics/i...
> ban private equity firms owning residential properties

What happens to apartments? What is a "PE" fund defined as? REITs own a number of properties but are not PE. Are small landlords banned from renting? What is the delineation of a Family Office/Small Landlord and a PE fund?

You've basically done the policy equivalent of asking you to build me a website that can host FB level load with no other criteria except Facebook did it.
Yes, this is exactly my point. The fundamental issue is greed, not housing. If we don’t get rid of the greed, these houses will be either bought up by investment corporations or the wealthy people that didn’t get second houses the first time around.
> Rich people do not hoard cash. They invest it, all of it.

Did I not make that clear? I said that they "don’t appreciably change their expenditures except of course on finance (sic) assets, which observably have inflated like crazy."

I dislike the lazy and misleading usage of "investing" for a simple asset swap of cash for already issued financial assets, even though that's what most people mean by the term. That is a savings reallocation. Investing is when you actually allocate new capital, so for example buying into an IPO, a public offering, angel investing, buying equipment, and so on.

> Rich people do not hoard cash. They invest it, all of it. Even money deposited in a bank account gets invested, as the bank loans it out.

Banks don't loan deposits, but rather loan origination creates deposits. You're a very smart guy, take some time to learn how the banking system actually works.

> There are no Scrooge McDuck cash vaults.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has entered the chat.[1]

[1] https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/goldvault.html
At the time all of these people purchased their (absurdly cheap, relatively -- or tax/interest-incentivized) second houses, there was nobody sitting across from them.

That's what you fail to understand.
> the present must agree with boundary conditions in the future.

This is true but it's not really what's meant by backwards causation here. The specific thing you need is for what happens from times (-ε, ε) to depend on what will happen at times (1-ε, 1+ε) even after conditioning on the intervening times (ε, 1-ε).

Action principles are still local: maximizing the integral of the Lagrangian L(x(t)) over time (by, for instance, taking the shortest path) is equivalent to satisfying dL/dx = d/dt dL/d(dx/dt).

> by (virtually) taking all of them.

This is a superficially appealing analogy but very misleading. Even if you take Feynman diagrams literally, which you shouldn't, the "path" integral runs over field configurations. The classical notion of a particle following some path simply breaks down here.
It's easy to take the stance that nothing should ever be thrown out. It's always possible, if unlikely, it will be important.

Museums, archived, and similar institutions have warehouses of junk that essentially never get looked at. Baring an infinite budget, you have to start throwing stuff out eventually.
> Unlike BLM rioting or bombing of the capitol by the far left terrorist they didn't do any property damage or attack other people on the street.

Oh. I guess that makes it OK for the armed right-wing mob to try to seize control of the national government — and to go looking for the sitting VP and Speaker of the House, seemingly with lynching in mind.

(Leftist bombing? You mean by the Weather Underground in 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War? That doesn't excuse it by any means, course, but it's so old as to be irrelevant to today's discussion.)

https://www.history.com/news/us-capitol-building-violence-fi...
What I can use works great on FF on my S22 Ultra, but it's not interactive because the shader fields won't register taps as click events.
> Nobody should be surprised that removing an entire portion of the population would cause the homicide rate to fall the same way nobody would be surprised that there is less rainfall on a day that has less cloud coverage.

If the homicide rate had fallen by only 2%, I would not have considered it notable. In effectively all societies, the vast majority of serious crimes are committed by a tiny sliver of the population who offend again and again. Deal with that sliver, and everyone else can breathe free.
To be fair this has to be one of the stupidest headlines.
That is cross platform though…
Ahhh okay. So this is an international organized crime ring. That’s always going to be difficult to beat, but Apple is fighting it.

The measures they’ve already taken are a pretty good deterrent against casual theft though.
I mean I agree that principally what needs to happen is that houses need to be built & cities need to densify, but there's no question huge chunks of prime inner city real estate lie vacant because of wealth inequality & land speculation.

A land value tax would do a lot to put these underutilized spaces to work.
I've been dealing with transactions regularly in the past few years, but not constantly, as things work correctly most of the time. And I still need to refresh my memory pretty much every time I go back to revisit some transactional code, or to answer any non-trivial questions about it.

So I guess it's just the way it is :)
Resume+: understand why your resume isn't getting noticed
The experiment is quickly varying the policy. Trying to compare n=1 decades apart, in the century that saw the greatest change in human history (so far), is a cool intellectual exercise but not simple-stupid enough to be empirical.