skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Note that this is specific to RSA keys. In no scenario (that doesn't involve extraterrestrial resources or perhaps nuclear fusion) can you create an ECC key, let alone a hash fingerprint, with 40 bytes of vanity. Afaik ECC keys are considered to be half the strength of a symmetric key (pre-quantum), so that's 20 fully random bytes or 160 bits of entropy. The sun simply doesn't hit the earth with enough energy even if you'd capture 100% of that and starve all life for it to do a computation of that magnitude. (The boundary is around the standard 128-bit key size iirc; I keep forgetting if the sun's energy would be sufficient for like ~120 bits or more like ~140 bits... and that's assuming perfectly efficient computational machines.)

Since the person you're responding to didn't specify which public key type, and since it's not obvious that your mention of RSA is to the exclusion of other algorithms such as ECC, I felt like the comment is a bit misleading
> Tech companies are making record profits

This has nothing to do with interest rates and I didn't make any comments about profits.

Here is a good overview about how interests rates are related to unemployment rates.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_curve
> leave a larger coin to [...] go quicker

It'll go quicker, but it won't save space! Unless we make smaller half dollars, just as the gold colored dollar coins took over after the large dollar coins we had previously. Perhaps something with a diameter similar to a nickel but a thickness similar to a penny or quarter.
The interesting thing here isn't so much the improved latency or whatever, it's the ability to ssh from a client that's on a network which restricts access to anything other than 80/443
It would depend entirely on the software running on your router.
… Eh? The issue that people have with this is that it’s _terrible_, and hideously unethical. Not that it’s illegal (it’ll depend on jurisdiction, but I’d think stuff like this is generally a bit of a grey area, but not clearly illegal.)

Mind you, one could reasonably describe Twitter in 2023 as a whole as “terrible, and hideously unethical”, so, eh, y’know.
i believe you are just making assumptions here; debian in this context does not count as a "simple system", if anything it's as complex as a distro can be and its packaging approach is a polar opposite of chimera's

i still like debian either way, because it's a nice community with good values/principles that has provided and still provides great value to the ecosystem, but it can also often be very fragile

the "just works" point of chimera stems from how things are built; everything it comes with is made to be "install and go" without having to go extra length to enable and set it up (while still being entirely transparent to the user), while being deterministic (packages in general don't rely on install hooks etc.) to ensure safe upgrades and easy auditing, and all that in a framework of a system that has a fraction of the complexity of a large distro and is maintainable by a small team

we make it consistently clear that it's not a reactionary project (https://chimera-linux.org/docs/faq, https://floss.social/@chimera_linux/111553324359284350, etc) and has no hostility to GNU or any of the projects we use alternatives to by default (and anybody displaying such hostility is unwelcome in the community)
You would like China then.

In the US and most of the west, governments derive their power from the governed, which means their ability to investigate crime is at the consent of the governed as well. It is due to the law not catching up to technology that google has been allowed to share that information.

If cops need information to catch criminals they should get warrants. No company can refuse such a request so long as a magistrate reviews it as being a lawful pursuit of justice.
What's mind bending to me is that a second object just short of that point _also_ sees the first object frozen. It doesn't matter how close you get to the horizon, the image of an object that got there first is still infinitely far in your future.
This makes me uncomfortable. It's scary
ETF specialists who want to do YC?
I'm looking for someone with deep expertise in ETFs (including how they're traded, built and deployed into the financial markets) AND who really wants to do YC. Must be really smart and articulate.

Background in econ/finance/cs from T25 is preferred.
Considering the degree to which America lags behind the rest of the developed world in things like medical access, vacation, worker protections, etc. That would probably be a good thing.
That seems like an odd takeaway from the link.
https://hachyderm.io/@robpike/111593487329402102
There was a time period when Xcode was truly awful: incredibly slow, crashed often, the syntax highlighter kept crashing so you’d be editing code with no syntax coloring forget autocompletion or diagnostics. I’m glad AppCode existed at this point because it was basically unusable.

I believe this dark point was when Swift came out, up to 2.0 or 3.0. They definitely rushed it and I believe rushed a lot of other features into Xcode.

But otherwise, Xcode in the early days was great, and Xcode today is great. I suspect most of the haters are remembering the bad times. Or maybe they have an old computer, and Apple software is known for being slow on older devices (“planned obsolescence”, I think Apple just adds bloat to their software when they develop faster hardware because they don’t notice). Or maybe they are complaining because Xcode is ridiculously large (it requires like 40GB free space to install) and does weird stuff when installing, there are probably issues you can run into with certain system configurations (particularly with, again, older systems). Or maybe we’re spoiled by good IDEs (even VSCode is fast despite being Electron, I still prefer JetBrains and AppCode).
>An unmaintained network server is not safe to run, period.

Period, huh?

Could you please advise, in excruciating detail, exactly why is it not safe to run an unmaintained network server in an environment with no access to any untrusted network? How is is a security risk to run an old version of synergy between two machines which can only talk to each other and don't even have any physical link to any other machine? Which aspect of being old or unmaintained or "written in an unsafe language" allows remote code execution over an airgap? Please be sure to provide links and references, I've not heard of this trick before, I'll be pretty impressed.

Yeah, they're "vague insinuations".

There are many possible mitigations to the old "it's unmaintained, therefore insecure" security-theatre chestnut - another comment in this thread specifically mentions that most security issues are mitigated by running over an SSH tunnel. There are more secure options like routing all networking via a VPN, or as mentioned above simply not being accessible from an untrusted network.

You don't know the details of everybody's requirements or environment, so you're not in a position to dictate what security precautions or risks are reasonable for them to take or ignore in their particular circumstances.

Some people, for example, need to be able to use or access machines running old operating systems. These are situations that do actually exist in the real world, often due to reasons related to them being in the real world, and very often outside the control of the people trying to get stuff done.

There are lots of valid reasons why people want to run old software, too.

A normal desktop setup runs the software you expect it to run, and can connect to the machine you were able to connect to yesterday, to continue to get stuff done.

A "normal" desktop doesn't suddenly shit the bed refusing to run software which is perfectly fine to run in your particular set of circumstances, and it certainly doesn't insist on overriding the judgement of the experienced user who has evaluated the security implications, if any, and decided to proceed anyway, to get stuff done.
This is why we should only trust reviews from reputed independent publications. But good for the market and AMD if these claims are true. Competition breeds innovation.
> mass produce something that ~doesn't decompose and spread a bunch everywhere so at least one will be found.

Plastics? Micro plastics?
Interesting that not long time ago USA was at the forefront of world technology. But nowadays not so much. Even more worrying it's China that in many areas leads the world - best highway, railroad, 5G networks, digital payments everywhere, huge production of electric cars, buses and batteries.

Looks like so far OpenAI, Google/DeepMind and Anthropic are ahead of Chinese companies in term of AI, but for how long?

If not for Elon Musk, China today would completely dominate EV and space launch industries.
And you're missing the point that the things that drive people to deliberately cause harm with firearms (which is AGAIN, the reason why the statistics are what they are) are completely unaffected by the best practices taught today.

Congratulations that you and your spouse are completely immune from ever experiencing brain tumors or traumatic brain injuries that cause wild behavioral changes. You should really let us all know how you know, a priori, that you'll never experience such a psychologically traumatizing event that it would push you into such an action. That would save millions of veterans' lives.

I am not saying that people shouldn't own or keep firearms in light of these statistics. I'm saying that "I observe safe practices with my firearms, so those statistics don't describe me" is along the same lines as "I know I'm a good driver, so all the statistics about most dangerous days/times/situations to drive are irrelevant to me". It's a failure of imagination on your part. You can still mitigate the how's and why's of those statistics, but it takes a lot more than a gun safe and a trigger lock, and it's stuff that is never actually characterized as "gun safety".
I mean, you say that, but also this story was a thing that happened:

https://www.cnet.com/science/sea-plankton-found-on-the-outer...
I remember seeing Do Ho Suh’s Boiler Room, London Studio there. Very cool piece.

https://ocula.com/art-galleries/victoria-miro-gallery/artwor...

Across the street is the Yale Center for British Art which is also free, and worth a visit just to experience the building.

https://thespaces.com/yale-center-british-art-reopens-khan/

And down the block from Arethusa Farm Dairy. It’s not free, but is some of the best ice cream you’ll ever have.

https://www.arethusafarm.com/new-haven
These are huge exceptions
Jobs was a very good salesman and showman. Dude probably could have convinced you to buy penny stocks and other dog shit assets while reaping massive bonuses (ie, Jordan Belfort).

Glad he went the route of pushing his vision of the iPhone and getting the right people on the team to make it “real”. Apple really would not be the company it is today without the foundation that Jobs and Woz laid out.
Update: I actually used Usenet a bit yesterday, mostly reading administrators explaining how the system works, and deleting spam. It's a cool system, I guess.

It should be possible to have other things built on top of the protocol. The protocol is a store-and-forward broadcast system, and is mostly agnostic to what goes in the packets, although if you want to add a group, each server operator has to agree to carry it, and they can have server-specific restrictions on things like message sizes, dropping messages outside the limits, so it isn't reliable. If you wanted to make a Usenet group simulating Reddit, you could easily pass votes through the system. Clients would have to interpret them, so you'd have to write your own client.

It's tolerant of spam as long as it isn't extremely excessive. There was talk of de-peering Google due to a large volume of spam, before Google made the decision itself, but most groups are about half spam besides that. The low volume of actual users contributes to this.

There's a group, I think news.admin.peering, for requesting your own server to be connected to the network. I see many successful requests from various people in the group's history. The network is fully decentralized, so being connected is reliant on at least one other person being willing to connect to you.
CUPS subsystem for Windows™
ALTOUMAN Mini PC Windows 11 Pro: Intel Alder Lake N100, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Dual 4K Display, WiFi 6, BT 5.2

Scopri l'innovativo Mini PC ALTOUMAN con processore Intel Alder Lake N100, 4-core 4-thread fino a 3.7GHz. Dotato di 16GB di RAM DDR4 e SSD Crucial da 512GB NVMe PCIe 3.0 per elevate prestazioni.

Offrendo una doppia visualizzazione 4K Ultra HD tramite le due porte HDMI, questo Mini PC Windows 11 Pro garantisce efficienza nel lavoro, intrattenimento e studio. La connettività avanzata WiFi 6 e BT 5.2 assicura trasmissioni stabili e veloci.

Ricevi assistenza garantita con un anno di garanzia e supporto tecnico a vita. Affidati all'ALTOUMAN Mini PC per soddisfare le tue esigenze di multimedia, video editing e gaming con prestazioni affidabili e avanzate.ALTOUMAN Mini PC Windows 11 Pro: Intel Alder Lake N100, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Dual 4K Display, WiFi 6, BT 5.2

Scopri l'innovativo Mini PC ALTOUMAN con processore Intel Alder Lake N100, 4-core 4-thread fino a 3.7GHz. Dotato di 16GB di RAM DDR4 e SSD Crucial da 512GB NVMe PCIe 3.0 per elevate prestazioni.

Offrendo una doppia visualizzazione 4K Ultra HD tramite le due porte HDMI, questo Mini PC Windows 11 Pro garantisce efficienza nel lavoro, intrattenimento e studio. La connettività avanzata WiFi 6 e BT 5.2 assicura trasmissioni stabili e veloci.

Ricevi assistenza garantita con un anno di garanzia e supporto tecnico a vita. Affidati all'ALTOUMAN Mini PC per soddisfare le tue esigenze di multimedia, video editing e gaming con prestazioni affidabili e avanzate.
Text content is under 100MB per day, including spam, according to some Usenet admins.
Text outline with section breakdown and key images for folks that prefer it: https://www.videogist.co/videos/freight-trains-last-week-ton...
WyGPT: Minimal mature GPT model in C++
It doesn’t count most of the model, since it’s memory; it only shows up as memory used by the disk cache.

Though if your machine can’t keep it all in memory, then speed will still fall off a cliff.
If the process you just described was actually secure then the computers could verify on its own. The problem is with an active mitm attack the attacker knows both sets of emojis and can modify the messages to both parties to look like they recieved the correct ones.
Correction: there are several other servers and the text part is less dead than I thought.
Short term thinking also doesn't matter to investors. They can drop the stock like a hot potato any time they want. There are no incentives built in for long term holding.
Aside from LM Studio there's also Faraday https://faraday.dev/
Marketing spam
I've informally referred to this as "ASCIImoji", but TIL that its proper name is "Kaomoji": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaomoji
Gen-z/alpha will lament at millenials screwing them over with crap like this. Same as how millenials lament about boomers and the state of the economy.

The solution is legal not tech. 5G and wifi6 may allow the government to listen in and watch everything we do but it is the law that can prevent them from doing that. Even in public, there is an expectation of privacy. If you look up a woman's skirt, you can't use "she was in public" as an excuse, it's still a crime because there was an expectation of privacy.

Anyone should be allowed to view and record public activities but not in a way that unveils information explicitly hidden from the public. If you have x-ray vision like superman for example, it would be illegal to see under people's cloths or to read information in the journal in their pocket. Now replace x-ray vision with 5G/wifi6 radio.
Thank you for this, now I can say things are “old as fsck”.
Pleased to see this posted here again. Nielsen's writing on Anki and memory systems more broadly has been nothing short of incisive, inspiring and paradigm-shifting in contributing to the ongoing "hermeneutic turn" within the community. Whilst this is not as evident as with his later essays, ATLM lays the foundations for some of the most important points for beginners of using the tool: a focus on coherence, disambiguation, and crystallisation as virtues of an Ankification practice; and above all shifting the conversation from it as a miserable prosthetic to memorise arbitrary associations to a genuinely beautiful tool that you can use to shape and change what you know, are and do.

The former interpretation's popularisation does unfortunately seem to be the outcome of it being embedded within the epistemic ecologies of language learning and medical school, two situations where Anki is almost inevitable if one is to succeed, but also where its unique power of meaning making is most neglected. As he writes in "Building a better memory system" [1], targeting the audience of the creative expert seems to be where the most tractability in expanding and improving a mnemonic practice lies. I hope such progress continues in the vein of current open-source and community-oriented advancements such as FSRS - the best feature of which is making switching from SuperMemo all the more obvious ;)

[1] https://michaelnotebook.com/bbms/index.html
That would be true if it was managers actually making the decision who to fire. It's increasingly centralized all the way to the top.
you can buy a 4" block of solid tungsten on amazon. I am pretty sure that will stick around for a while.
All SSH keys are TOFU! You can't mitigate the state-controlled PKI thing by saying it's TOFU; you get that property even without DNSSEC!
It’s really just a difference in accounting. Memory used for memory-mapped files aren’t shown in the “used” header, but instead the disk cache one. And doesn’t need to be swapped out to be discarded, so if you lack the memory it just slows everything down without an obvious cause.
Personally I think articles like this are actually the shreds of evidence you say don't exist.

If there isn't life on Enceladus this is still incredibly exciting because then it might make the perfect lab for us to put life and study how it evolves.
In gaming, especially simulators: The 5800x3d and then the 7800x3d has proved how exemplary performance benefits can be gained in certain use cases, in some cases outperforming Intel with less than half the power usage (if not a third).

Limiting overclocking is a price to pay for that, but you kind of get it back with the monthly power bills - and still going toe to toe with Intel in general.
I think you mean two out of three, given that only three are variable.

The penny is fixed, as you say, lest the set size fall sharply from 99 to 19 (if there's no smaller than a 5c piece) etc. at which point optimal coinage varies anyway.
I was very confused Scott the selection of GPUs
> reasoning about all of the potential impacts of the change was hard

It's far easier for us as humans to think "this change will affect new data going forward" rather than "when I make a change in the present, it will transform all data from the past as if it had always been the case." Perhaps comic book writers would make good event sourcing engineers - but I digress.

One of the saving graces of event sourcing is that you can spin up a parallel world where you make those changes, rerun your entire event history, and do a diff between your production derived data and your proposed production derived data as of a point in time, identifying the actual situations where pathological cases would occur. But this takes a lot of discipline, and it's not perfect, because events don't exist in a vacuum - they are snapshots of a human being taking an action relative to the data they saw at the time, and if you're retconning the data they saw, it might not match the reasons they took the actions they did.

A common pathological case I find is: "Someone overrode value X to Y, now I have the ability to automate that fix - but did they mean to freeze Y for a different business reason outside the one I did? If at some time in the future it changes upstream from X to Z, should I keep the user's intent to freeze Y or change it to Z because the freeze to Y was just because we didn't have the fix?"

Relational approaches don't solve this, to be sure, and in fact there's worse tooling to have good answers to this question. But they do incentivize the discipline of talking to stakeholders before making a giant wide-scoped UPDATE on data at rest. Event sourcing's power to retcon makes it far too easy to say "let's just reinterpret the history, what's the worst that can happen?"
Taking a slight sidetrack to relativity, consider just how absurd our universe is. To maintain the consistency of the speed of light from all reference frames, time (and 'real' distance) are instead the variables, and there is every reason to believe this is correct. If you didn't know this to be the actual case, it'd feel absurd to even consider it.

Trying to intuitively and logically reason about something with no answer in sight, all while assuming the truths of our era, may ultimately be pointless.

Our universe, logical though it may be, plays by its own rules, and many things will be simply irreconcilable until those rules are further elaborated on.

As an aside the big bang also does not really answer the prerequisite question of where the initial inorganic matter/energy came from. The idea there being some sort of a quantum fluctuation, which then begs the question of its origin. I suppose it's just turtles all the way down.
Meanwhile: https://www.businessinsider.com/cox-active-listening-claims-...
Look at the specs for the Core series since 2007. The clocks have doubled. It’s not a fast increase, to be sure, but it’s happening
They did not "scale just fine" because the situation is so much worse in many newer networks that the default way >99% of users interact with it is through a trusted gateway provider instead of running a full node
This is how I feel watching those shows listing all of the stats on super cars. Yes, they're fast and they're pretty, but I'll never afford one, so learning the inner details is lost effort on me
Nonsense, the response you'll get is to spend more time investigating:

"To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: “If you don’t see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think HARDER and investigate better. ""
It doesn't have to be about saving money.
I was going to say, the main reason todo apps fail is because they are specifically about doing what people don't want to do.

If there were a generic way to unfuck your life on the other side of it, I could see it being wildly popular. Like a linear progression in weights, or a fasting diet, or a spaced repetition scheme, but for unwinding the effects of avoidant behaviours, with progress and results, that would be valuable.
the caches are already ~75% of the space. you can't significantly increase that. On die ram is also relatively unlikely due to process differences. my best guess is more 3d cache chips. if we can get the interconnects small enough and fast enough, I could see a future where the logic is stacked on top of a dozen (physical) layers of stacked cache
I chose Stripe 8 years ago. And I'd probably still use Stripe now. I'd probably use Stripe Payment Links + webhooks if I were starting an MVP today. After the first few customers ask, I'd add a way for them to manage their subscription via Stripe Billing Portal.