skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They could use this and a bubble in the site explaining this might be review bombing and show the score of the book disregarding these events.
I’ve never understood why people have such a negative opinion on goodreads, though. I guess this is the only thing I know of that makes it bad.
Well put. Thanks for explaining it succinctly.
Golang.org/x/crypto/SSH fix pre-announcement
That's like saying calories can't be counted with 100% certainty, so we should eat integers instead.

> What has come to light is neither nihilism nor cynicism, as one might have expected, but a quite extraordinary confusion over elementary questions of morality — as if an instinct in such matters were truly the last thing to be taken for granted in our time.

-- Hannah Arendt, "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil"
https://youtu.be/XbUvDTMkjwA

Yet another good version.
On other CI systems it is also a good idea to only use the YAML file to call a bash/python/deno/... script which does the actual work.
Notwithstanding the US's deeply hypocritical stance on treaties it hasn't ratified but others must follow, North Korea did in 1985 sign the NPT which forbids them even building nuclear weapons, as well as the 1992 "South-North Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" where they explicitly pledge not to test nuclear weapons (which they indeed didn't do until 2006).

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron
I’m a big fan of base58

+ almost as efficient as base64
+ no special characters
+ no padding characters
Urgh. And it gets worse from there. The bugs list on the repo has a closed and locked bug report from someone claiming that their code is using teacher forcing!

https://github.com/duanyiqun/DeWave/issues/1

In a normal recurrent neural network, the model predicts token-at-a-time. It predicts a token, and that token is appended to the total prediction so far which is then fed back into the model to generate the next token. In other words, the network generates all the predictions itself based off its own previous outputs and the other inputs (brainwaves in this case), meaning that a bad prediction can send the entire thing off track.

In teacher forcing that isn't the case. All the tokens up to the point where it's predicting are taken from the correct inputs. That means the model is never exposed to its own previous errors. But of course in a real system you don't have access to the correct inputs, so this is not feasible to do in reality.

The other repo says:

"We have written a corrected version to use model.generate to evaluate the model, the result is not so good"

but they don't give examples.

This problem completely invalidates the paper's results. It is awful that they have effectively hidden and locked the thread in which the issue was reported. It's also kind of nonsensical that people doing such advanced ML work are claiming they accidentally didn't know the difference between model.forward() and model.generate(). I mean I'm not an ML researcher and might have mangled the description of teacher forcing, but even I know these aren't the same thing at all.
Flagged usually means that users did it, not mods. I flagged it for two reasons:

* The article is nearly devoid of substance. Nearly all of the content is just copy/pasted from a Twitter argument, with a non-trivial amount of text devoted to detailing the like counts for each post. That's not the kind of post I like to see on the front page, but anger about Wikipedia's handling of money gets a lot of upvotes based on the title alone, regardless of the quality of the content. The flag mechanism is there for precisely this situation: to remove posts that will lead to low-quality knee-jerk reactions instead of thoughtful discussion.

* The submitter seems to have a vendetta against Wikipedia: if you look at their submissions [0] with showdead turned on, 25/34 of their submissions are negative posts about Wikipedia. That's a weirdly single-minded fixation on targeting negativity at a single company, and something that I'd like to see discouraged on HN. Disliking Wikipedia is fine, but if most of your interactions with HN are trying to push that dislike on the community, that's unhealthy.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=kurtreed
Sure, but the goal at the end of the day isn't to understand it fully, it's to have something that you can swap out and swap back in the next day.
… I mean, you’re describing, er, maybe North Korea? Not sure anywhere else has those policies. Maybe the Soviet Union in the Stalinist period (substitute gulags for execution).

I’m… not sure that these policies are proven to make most peoples’ lives better. Where are you getting that? Historically, places which pursue these sorts of extremely draconian policies tend to be very, very nasty places to live.
> There’s a great many people around right now who’s primary redeeming quality is their impending mortality

Ha ha, that's funny (but not nice — but I like it).
The list of the authors targeted have all been people of color, iirc. Given publishing is like 75+% white, it's very improbable to just accidentally target half a dozen or more debuts and they just all happen to not be white. Additionally, there is a conversation that the author faked having with a "friend". The "friend" actually admits to targeting poc authors in order to "sabotage" cait.
I need a browser extension that replaces all citations/references to social media with "according to hearsay and rumor..."
It's a fair argument. Realistically it could cost about 1-2% of performance.

Though ArchLinux is a tinkerer's distro, the same cannot be said for Ubuntu/Fedora.

I personally think this would benefit me more than it would hurt.

Besides if you're really looking for performance, you want packages compiled for `x86-64-v3`.
CachyOS has those: https://wiki.cachyos.org/cachyos_repositories/what_is_the_ca...

Maybe some day we will have x86-64-v3 repo's in ArchLinux.
They added support for high end radeon cards 2 months ago. Rocm is "eventually" coming to RDNA in general but it's a slow process which is more or less in line with how AMD has approached rocm from the start (targetting a very small subset of compute and slowly expanding it with each major version).

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-enables-rocm-and-pytor...
Can we train an LLM based on brainwaves rather than written text? Seems to be closer to how we actually think and thus should enable the LLM to learn to think rather than just learn to mimic the output.

For example, when writing we have often gone done many thought paths, evaluated each and backtracked etc, but none of that is left in the text an LLM trains on today. Recording brainwaves and training on that is probably the best training data we could get for LLMs.

Getting that data wouldn't be much harder than paying humans to solve problems with these hats on recording their brainwaves.
Seems like you got bit by VS Code, which is why I avoided that dep too. Try devpod.sh, it's independent, has a cli that's working great for me, and you can 'ssh' into the container from your terminal so you don't need VS Code's terminal
I just don´t think its fair to let close to 100% of a nationality and discriminate or "holistically" analyze against against another group.
I wrote a book https://www.amazon.com/Managing-Machine-Learning-Projects-De... and despite really pushing I've only had three people review it.

I asked all my friends, all my contacts, no one would review it!

So, it's frustrating.
Sure, but in this case, we don't know.
Given the amount of bad encounters I've had driving post-2020, and interacting with strangers, I think it's seeping into the real world as well.

The way people act and speak in public feels noticeably different than even a few years ago, let alone 10-20. People are very short with each other now.

Even more disturbing, I think I can feel the change in myself too at times.
No, it won't, because that concern often leads to polices that have unintended consequences that in the end hurt the welfare of others.
> That's like saying

I disagree with "that's like that". I think your analogy is very far.

Calories metrics are actually much better researched and measured compared to human decency.
I've read multiple times that there've been discussions in a few places around the world to ban cats, or certain breeding of cats to save wildlife, or birds specifically. But I haven't heard any law become real, anyone?
Those policies aren't proven to work and your caveat renders the assertion meaningless.

But regardless: it is well studied that fascism is an appeal to emotion, not reason. Neither Italian fascism nor German nazism were rational or grounded in science. They were pseudoscientific and appealed to notions of blood, purity, sacrifice and nationalism -- that is, they appealed to emotion. They clouded the reason.
Heart can be understood as a metaphor. It doesn't speak, so it can be a metaphor for love and empathy. A metaphor with an appeal to power is usually associated with the gut.
Haha, yeah, but I've been using them for years and it's only now getting easier than writing really long scripts over and over again
Still, we did have the industry in Germany and it produced quality panels without shady practices like Chinese manfuacturers.
They probably meant protocol.land.
That's a good step forward. This separation is a massive barrier to entry. Making CUDA work reliably on every product was a masterstroke by NVIDIA.
You don't need brain surgery or an MRI to scan a brain, this just uses an EEG.
Far ahead of you, a lot of the non-stewardship and non-ignition work of NIF is for creating neutrons, although you don't even need ignition levels of energy to make neutrons with lasers. Although the research is premature and the beams aren't as good as spallation sources, tabletop (as in a laser table a few metres across) ultra-intense laser systems have been generating neutron beams in a single room for almost a decade+ now, we just need to improve the beams and get the word out there.
Gigabyte has a great support bracket design that screws in to two ATX holes on the motherboard and holds the card up from underneath[1]. It's one of the best designs I've seen because it bolts the weight across two planes on the case, but requires the PCI-e slots to be in a standard configuration (not a given on every board - it fit on my Z790 board but not an X670e board that I tried)

I think flat desktop cases might not be a bad answer, especially with the useless stands that come on most monitors these days with no height adjustment. Typically I need to raise a monitor several inches to not have to tilt it up and stare down at it, which is terrible posture. Going back to the old style (CRT sitting on top of a beefy steel desktop box) wouldn't be so bad.

Otherwise, even without an industry standardized max-length, enthusiast case manufacturers could solve this by providing their own brackets that span the width of the case and screw onto matching holes across from the PCI-e mounts. They could even put RGB lights on them to make them look less ugly for people with glass side panels.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSYodaliYGE
We run a self-hosted Gitlab Premium instance installed with Omnibus for 30 devs and we actually install Gitlab updates on a cron.

Had two upgrades that needed minor manual intervention in 5 years. Uptime better than Github despite the #yolo approach.
Apple's 2024 Will Be About Moving Beyond the iPhone
The most frustrating thing in your life
Both (and Radicle) are web3.

So, it's probably not your jive.
You are effectively describing an appeal to emotions, not reason.
B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person
If he actually changed Amazon's behavior so that it wasn't a horrible place to work for? If he donated an actual, significant portion of his wealth that required real sacrifice on his part?

Basically, if he did something that had a positive effect on the world that also had real consequences for him. Something that actually shows he _means_ it, actually _wants_ the world to be better even if it hurts himself.

If Bezos or Musk or Zuckerberg or Gates(1) did any of that, I'd be thinking differently.

(1) The Gates foundation has done a LOT. Bill Gates is still worth ~$135,000,000,000. A quick search says ending homelessness in the USA would take less than a quarter of that.
The proton gradient serves to regulate the combustion, one molecule at a time...
What was lost was hard work ethic and the perspective of how good life is now, respect for others, and we've gained some arrogance from never having to suffer.

I had an odd life, I lived in the projects as a child until I was sent to my grandfathers farm for 6~ years, and after that, back to the violent city I had originally lived in. I was at a huge disadvantage compared to my peers but from the hard word I was subjected to in those 6 years (work ethic it taught me), pure luck of getting into computer science (thanks to John Carmack via doom/quake), and meeting the right people, I was able to work much harder than those around me and rise up quickly through the worlds biggest tech companies, make a ton of money to the point where I was able to retire at 40 (though I didn't and still work).

To answer your question, in my view, that's what was lost -- a connection to brutal hard work that keeps the world moving forward.
Direct link: https://hai.stanford.edu/news/how-well-do-large-language-mod...
Are those policies proven to work? The war on drugs was proven to be ineffective, many successful businessmen are immigrants or the children of immigrants, and mental asylums were brutal institutions that only propagated mental illness and did not cure it.

All of these solutions, however, make people feel like “someone is doing something”, which is an emotional appeal even though those methods are empirically ineffective.
Tripping Train 185 – A Great Meditation Video
This is my favourite video for meditating or just chilling out. This Youtube video from TVO is almost 3 hours long. Although there are some stops along the way, most of the video is filmed from the front of the train looking down the tracks as it travels from Sudbury to White River through the forest of the Canadian Shield in Northern Ontario, Canada.
I mean, you can just look this stuff up; it’s not like what ol’ Mini-Hands says at campaign rallies is secret or anything: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-says-im...

What you have to remember is that he’s not, you know, a smart guy. And the base he’s appealing to with this stuff are also generally, well, probably not in the running for any Nobel prizes.
My usual is SALET (high frequency vowels in 2nd and 4th place), followed by CURIO to provide more hints if needed. Then review the information acquired. Usually it’s solved on the 4th attempt, occasionally on the 3rd. Sometimes there are too many options and I bust out. Just my opinion, probably not optimal strategy.
I think a better strategy that would require less ongoing maintenance would be for someone to build the mobile app and a routing server similar to what is in place now rather than reengineer the core server and mobile apps to use a different tech stack for notifications than it currently does.

I kinda feel that while doing something like would serve a segment of the user base this would also be a bit disingenuous to the folks at Zulip who have done an amazing job at balancing commercial monetization needs with their dedication open source principals and giving away their labor of love to world in general.
> "Don't let your mind speak louder than your heart"

The "heart" has always symbolized goodness, kindness, love and benevolence.

That's the intended message here: always infuse your decisions with 'humanity'.
I avoid IDE specific workflows, that's why I'm using devpod. As a result, I can 'ssh' into the container from anywhere, or docker exec, and build automation just gets a 'docker exec' shoved in front of every command
Show HN: Chatbot to find AI /ML courses using CV
Select your target AI / ML job, upload your CV, and find recommended Udemy courses based on your skills matched with the target job
> Developing more efficient laser systems is one goal of the DOE’s new inertial-fusion-energy research programme. This month, the agency announced US$42 million over four years to establish three new research centres — each involving a mix of national laboratories, university researchers and industry partners — that will work towards this and other advances.

In other words, the government is spending enough to keep the lights on.
Ask HN: How to figure out a good direction/goals for the year ahead?
I always tend to fall into the trap of overthinking this. As someone that can always perceive all different angles and options when thinking about something, it's something I really struggle with and I become overwhelmed.

I'm very interested in the idea of having a great year, being ambitious, achieving a lot in that year etc, really moving my life forward rather than languishing but I always struggle to articulate what that would mean, how I should achieve that, what I need to change etc and when I start trying to think about it, I quickly become overwhelmed. My excitement and interest in doing this, quickly becomes a hindrance as my perfectionist tendencies tend to kick in and I try to look at it from every angle and have no idea what I should do.

I read articles / watch youtube videos and everyone has a different process and different journaling prompts etc, that just make me want to throw up. I guess I'm just not really good at self awareness, but I do have a clear desire to want to do something and to be able to move forward, but defining this, defining what really matters, figuring out what standards I have to hold myself too, how I need to think, what mindsets I need, how I need to schedule myself etc, just quickly makes my head explode, to the point I think i’ve thought quite hard about this every year, but at the end of each year, i’m not sure how helpful it has really been as I don’t seem to be any further ahead than those people that seem to give zero thought to any of this, except that I wear myself out trying to think about it, because I have this desire to improve myself.

Does anyone have a process they follow to cut out the noise?
For me an author disqualifies if there is an unnecessary use of jargon. In my experience the use jargon is often just a distraction from the fact that there is no thorough understanding of the subject.
The one where having kids with your cousins has higher chance of birth rate defects :)
Pixart-α: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Text-to-Image Synthesis
I'm not convinced the Web has gotten worse (or Web interactions worst necessarily). Maybe.

I kind of think it's the web itself that has trapped people indoors and into un-social lives when, in the past, boredom would have sent them out into the world to find some kind of entertainment or actual companionship.

(And I speak as someone who thinks I also needs to get out more.)
us-west-1 seems small. They routinely run out of the instance size we request and the spot market seems.. unruly
China uses mysterious homegrown chips for new Exaflop-class supercomputer
The article described in this submission has now been removed. Its url was: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/tips-and-solution... , I couldn’t find an archived version.
> It's not that Simple.

It can be as complicated as you want to make it. My original point was to supply the missing context that explains 95% of use cases.

> Request-response isn't a factor to choose ES or ED architectures on.

One's business use case and how it translates into an appropriate messaging pattern is arguably the most important factor to base an architecture on.

> You can have request-response, inline, blocking, cycles with ES or ED [...]

Yes, of course. And it's fair to say, at any point in your life, that one can do anything that one wants. Like, one could have rollerblades for hands, or one could implement request/response functionality with an event driven system.

But once we've moved past that, probably the next order of business is to justify the extremely good reason for overriding all prevailing common sense.
> the constitution forbids to convict someone two times for the same crime
He wasn't convicted, which means the reason he isn't convicted for the first time now is because he is not allowed to be convicted twice. That doesn't make sense to me.
Wait until they find out who owns social media.

Or the cloud.
You will hardly find a C++ compiler that is 100% C++17 compliant, lesser so with those later standards.

Currently all C++ implementations are lagging behind ISO, as all major commercial contributors focus in other stacks, and take C++14 / C++17 as good enough for their in-house use of C++.

The bigger three have lost steam, while everyone else is even further behind .
great vsauce video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXW-QjBsruE
I think you misunderstood the point of my comment.

If indeed it is an order of magnitude less deaths, then it probably doesn't matter if the demographics shift, but we actually have to see that change and know the demographics to actually know that. I'm just saying that we should pay attention, as we should with anything that has the capability to change per-capita figures for adverse actions, as to what is actually happening and not assume.

That said, since we're already seeing an increase in these cars and the use of their autonomous options which match "self-driving" to greater or lesser degrees, I doubt we're going to see a 10x decrease before they are inthe wild, because to some degree they already are.

I just want us to know what that means by looking at as much info as we can rather than a single metric.
I agree. I am surprised that many folks, not you of course, think that is okay.
Interesting that when we can't make chips bigger laterally, we go vertical and stack transistors. It's like we discovered high-rise buildings all over again.
Crockford is a bit different, and normalizes I/1/O/0 on parsing.
“Jesus Christ taught that baptism is essential to the salvation of all who have lived on earth (see John 3:5). Many people, however, have died without being baptized. Others were baptized without proper authority. Because God is merciful, He has prepared a way for all people to receive the blessings of baptism. By performing proxy baptisms in behalf of those who have died, Church members offer these blessings to deceased ancestors. Individuals can then choose to accept or reject what has been done in their behalf.”

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topi...
I was quite surprised to find at least one of the the top500 is based on AMD gpus, it seems to me not bringing that to the consumer market was a conscious choice made some time ago.
How do you like 50% used for war expenses, torturing political prisoners, purchasing palaces?
3Blue1Brown later issued a correction video (due to a minor bug in the initial code) that showed it should have been SALET [1].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRed0Xmc2Wg
(Linux) Repository Statistics
===> Security considerations and guarantees for Palestine and Israel from each other don't come until after that goal [of stopping ongoing civilian casualties happening as we speak] is achieved. <===

You have no proof of that. This is also pretty much ahistorical model of the world. Wishful thinking won't bring peace.

>>How could 2 sentences contain a thoughtful response? In this case, they don't. If you read the whole post, your reply will contain 2 yes-or-no answers. If not, it won't. Please read the whole post before reflexively responding again.

Because you are dodging my question by replying with questions.
When I first learned how nuclear reactors actually generate power it was a big WTF moment for me. Wait - do they really just heat water? For some reason I thought that there was a more advanced process to extract electricity from the reactor.