skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It depends.

The original snow white story as written down by the Brothers Grimm is not under copyright and Disney can't do anything to stop you using it.

But lot's of what is associated with that is actually original stuff by the Mouse and therefore (still) copyrighted or trademarked.

In particular the well known blue-yellow dress, red bow in her hair, the dwarves appaerences and names are all not part of the traditional fairy tale.

Also in that story snow white is a child roughly 7 years old.
What about when your device is bricked, and you can't use it any more and the company does not engage with you?

What the legal system says, the words they use, are not that interesting...
> That doesn't obviate the rights of the other Masimo shareholders

It does if they willingly sell their shares to Apple

> Then they buy the 50.1% of company for $500M and write off the debt to their subsidiary

Well that would not be legal.
They’d use their position as the majority shareholder to buy out everyone else and delist the company (of course they could still not sell, they’d just end up having shares in a private company)
Not all must be bad though. New communities and new things often allow more room for changes. Old communities often don't want to change, because "it's always been this way" or something similar. Not everything needs change, but if new ideas and new requirements have no space at all, you can't "blame" others for building new communities to accommodate those ideas and requirements.
It was still pretty chilly. A warm winter may help, but lots of people did turn down their heat. I certainly did, and I intend to keep doing it.

> It has to be based on economics, and technological improvement - these takes quite a while methinks.

Technology does keep improving. What's lacking is the political will, and that's probably because of vested economic interests.
Package Cybertruck to traverse 100M water as boat
That looks quite cool, I had been thinking about a way to get into byte sized programming.
How much time should be dedicated each day to complete it?
In the bigger picture this kind of behaviour would destroy the market for innovative tech. Why would anyone still invest in making something innovative if your work gets taken away from you the moment you become successful?
Slack can be closed or at least crippled by muting every channel.
That's true in the sense of "time invariance is not guaranteed as a first class feature". But as a practical matter this is as simple as choosing an invariant algorithm and disabling optimization for the module in question.
Chess at the highest levels is drawish, but we're talking 2500+ FIDE. The vast majority of players aren't near 2500. Memorisation isn't even a problem for most people because most people won't ever be playing at the professional level and even then the amount of memorisation required isn't as much as you're making it out to be. For example: a close friend of mine is an FM and I saw his opening files. He has around 500 lines on the Benko, around 600 lines on the English (1. c4) and 700 lines on the Sicilian Najdorf (including anti-Sicilians). That's his entire repertoire, which he has been building up for 10 years. That isn't a crazy amount. As for 960 theory, please show me. I've heard of 960 principles, like developing bishops before knights because bishops, but not actual opening theory.

>Middlegame theory

What do you mean by this? There are strategical principles, but I don't think I've ever heard of middlegame theory.

>Endgame theory

Endgame theory isn't too difficult up to around 2000 FIDE if you know the basic principles (taking opposition, key squares, square rule, philidor position, other rook endgame basics, knowing which pieces you can mate with, etc) which can be learnt in an evening. You said you love calculation. Well, to me, even if you don't know endgame theory you can still be a good endgame player if you're a good calculator.

Anyway, I agree with your other points about there being no money in chess and chess leading to an unhealthy lifestyle.
Five Hypotheses on Cyberwarfare in the Russo-Ukrainian War (2014-2023) [pdf]
The aurora is very active this year. We’ve seen it in twice in six days. Friends saw it the first night. Iceland Met has an Aurora forecast based n solar conditions and cloud cover

https://en.vedur.is/weather/forecasts/aurora/
Granted I've not lived long enough to have witnessed the birth of the internet with adult eyes; what I have personally observed is a constant battle of centralisation and standards forming.

For a common example that many people may remember, AOL was at one point pushing towards a centralised model and was succeeding- until they completely collapsed and the open web resumed being a thing.

Similar for the times where there were no standards on video playback on the web, a bunch of companies competed with completely incompatible systems that had various pains associated until eventually standards emerged that sunk the majority of it. (ironically one of them with a healthy helping from Apple).

The web was never really decentralised - it's a fond memory and a legend we tell ourselves, this battle seems to been waged from almost immediately after it was conceived.

I found a much more articulate article on the matter while I was writing: https://archive.is/UUgl7
It was also submitted last year - I thought it looked familiar!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34010980
Would be a better alternative to X imo
Isn't interoperability how we get decentralisation?
I'm going to see all the talks in the Railways and Open Transport devroom.

https://fosdem.org/2024/schedule/track/railways-and-open-tra...
Wins feel unearned (the opponent just played so bad) or accidental (he played good but made this one mistake, it could have gone either way).

In case of the loses you feel way more in control somehow (ooh, I definitely shouldn't have done that) or are just funny (I can't do anything, they are wiping the floor with me, it's comical) where you set up your own small goals to achieve because you have no hopes of actually competing (yes! I got him this one time so it's 12-1 not 12-0).
I would say, that beside logical performance as you called it, 99% of optimizations is profiling the memory allocations and minimizing it by using more performant (lower-lever) API's, or different techniques to reduce as many allocations as possible.

I've never really saw any meaningful examples of performance optimizations from the list you provided: memory layout, cache locality, access patterns. If that would be needed, I would say that wrong language was selected for solving the problem.

In my company, we use .NET for most of our applications, with Rust being used in places where we needed raw processing speed. But to this day, I'm not 100% convinced that was good choice - I don't know how much faster is Rust in our case vs .NET written with performance as priority, and overhead of interoperability, separate team, etc. is huge.
A tilt toward safety stopped a scientist's virus research
Intercept Flutter Traffic on iOS and Android (HTTP/HTTPS/Dio Pinning)
You can restrict most of these options both client- and server-side in SSH, which is basically always a winning move, regardless of protocol. You can't be downgraded to a protocol version or cipher that you've explicitly disabled.
Vulnerable Regular Expressions in JavaScript
Ok, no doom, but nice answer to the question of all hardware hack.
Also explains why housing is a "thing", but not cheap at all.
In Germany they vary aluminium production rates in response to electricity supply (i.e. produce much less when it's less sunny and windy). They just dont turn it off completely, ever.

There's probably a lot more low hanging electricity demand shifting fruit like this.
Because it's a tactical own-goal. Fair use as a defense looks at the market factors and the Emergency Library did damage the possibility of that defense while it was active; IA suddenly was giving out unrestricted copies of books they own. I can't do that with my digitally owned music without being seen as a pirate and fined for it - what makes IA different? Sure they have standing as a library in the eyes of the US government which gives them some defenses against the DMCA, but that still requires respecting the DMCA. The Emergency Library in that regard was no different from something like LibGen or the many other book piracy sites out there. It being temporary doesn't really change that.

That aside, to my understanding the failure of IAs version of CDL was established during fact finding but I think if the IA hadn't so blatantly just decided to disable all lending restrictions, the courts would probably have been willing to chalk it up to typical organisatorial negligence and left it at that.

It's just a very stupid move on the whole and frankly actively dangerous when you consider the other main service that IA operates (the Wayback Machine). The only defense the IA really has is "we're so essential to the modern internet that we shouldn't be punished for breaking the law", which I don't think the courts are gonna look very highly at.

And mind you that I say this as someone very sympathetic to wanting a more lenient look at modern copyright. It doesn't change that the IA decided to poke a dragon and got burned. There's better ways to advocate for change than to expect the courts to not follow the law because you want them to put in a new exemption for you.
Error connection is not really required here since there is no lossy communication medium.
I don't know what it is, but to answer your question: This could be people who were either burned so badly that they're not abandoning their assets due to a sunk-cost fallacy, or those who think they'll benefit from another round of pump-and-dump.
> Just look at the state of browsers gating access to APIs for sites on local sub networks.

Given we're on HN I think it's fair to nitpick a bit - what do you mean here? What API are you accessing through a browser? If it's a control panel or something through an API, you can install a cert into the browser, or get a wildcard cert signed for a local domain.
i'll be honest, i didn't really enjoy this article. i feel like there are people who are idealists and perfectionists and people who actually execute on ideas. i am not saying one can not change. certainly in my life i have been in the first category for many years or decades at a stretch. but i am at a productive period in my life and i write every day, i write music every day, i write code every day, i accomplish many other things through the course of a day. is everything i do perfect? no: not one thing i do is perfect. perfection is just some ideal or mental standard but it is not something that i think can ever be achieved except in very limited contexts, like maybe a game of tetris.

i remember some years ago reflecting back on some software project that had gone well. in my head, it was a beautiful finished object that i'd created using the tools and frameworks available to me. it was perfect and flawless.

then i went back and read the code and saw so many TODOs and things that i would have accomplished had i only had more time. and i never did get a chance to finish those TODOs, but the project launched successfully and generated a lot of revenue.
Loved this!!
Jay Alammar is one of the greats in our field and we are lucky to have him.
Still got ways to go in coding, compared to chatgpt4 and copilot. Also doesn't back down when caught lying.
Sorry, I don't see why you're replying to my comment on this - I wasn't saying Adobe is about to start a company town.
> With its compact size, Phi-2 is an ideal playground for researchers, including for exploration around mechanistic interpretability, safety improvements, or fine-tuning experimentation on a variety of tasks.

I think this aspect is underrated.

Research are pouring more and more effort into things like monosemanticity, for which small very powerful language models will probably be extremely helpful.
Nice, I was just looking for 2 player table top RPGs after playing "Mini Rogue" for some time.

Any recommendations?
For all we know, ChatGPT 4 might function like that
Why can’t Apple just disable the oxymeter feature in the interim and continue selling Apple Watches?
I feel like half the things you describe as needing to do at runtime are ok to exist in the declarative QML, but as a property with a signal. Position? Property. Basic/advanced view? Property. Splitter config? Property. Etc.

Leaving some things as parameters that can be adjusted in the model doesn't make the GUI not declarative. Preferences are just fine in a declarative world. Some things are harder than others, so list views that handle very generic data may need to be built manually, but those are exceptions.
I wanted to finally turn off that checkbox a few days ago and couldn't find it anywhere. The entire page it's supposed to be on didn't exist. I had no idea whether that meant I'm automatically opted in or out.

Thing is, if they use my dropbox content, it may be more a risk for them than for me; it's mostly PDFs I bought in webshops; stuff copyrighted by other people than me. My consent isn't that relevant; they need the consent of the actual copyright holders. And they don't have that.

This is the big problem with all these tech companies suddenly realise new ways to mine all that data that they happen to have access to. The data isn't theirs, and it's quite possibly not their users' either.
Excuse the hijack: what are the most powerful language models one can run on any smartphone (without meaningful delay)?
Even assembly doesn't work anymore, as CPU manufacturers no longer guarantee constant-time execution unless the software opts-in to constant-time mode: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YwgCrqutxmX0W72r@gmail.com/
Ha, we might be neighbors. I took a pretty similar picture from Sörlaskjól. I just happened to be chilling for the evening when I saw the red glow on the horizon and snapped a picture just as it started going up: https://imgur.com/xLZqcqO
I think it's good for us users. We need more companies to fight with each other. We can't sell everything to one company.

The EU is doing great work, in my opinion.
While ill admit I was popping off without cause last night, I think you are glossing over a few glaring examples. The entire military industrial complex is plagued by this behavior; despite spending more than the next several countries combined and invading several countries to protect "american interests", the world is a less safe place for americans than it was in the 90s, and we have managed to discard a 20 year lead in military technology for a 5 year disadvantage to international competitors. Institutional atrophy is on full display in the auto industry, which along with the airlines fit the criteria of zombie companies, neither are interested in innovation anymore because their market positions are guarenteed by government regulation and the promise of bailouts. Lastly, the most successful at political maneuvering often end up in government themselves, trading the stocks of companies they themselves are regulating, collecting royalties for drugs they approve, enjoying handsomely paying speaking gigs in exchange for their decades of service to their doners.

Yes, then there is tech, and it often does prove to pay the best for high skilled work like software development, and thats great. Lets not forget before google, samsung, and microsoft had cloud storage, there was another semi-popular cloud storage company whos owner was raided and placed on house arrest for years. Nor should we forget that companies like twitter were taking government bribes to engage in censorship. Its not like everything thats happened in tech has been a product of the free market, there is quite a bit of government help thats helped solidify the market dominance of certain tech companies.
Simplifying time variance in a SQL data warehouse
> I am concerned the iMessage on Android would simply serve to remove and obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones.

> I think we need to get Android customers using and dependent on Apple products. That is the best way to get them to consider our products in the future.

I wish more people to know about this kind of reasoning.
It's like meeting a friend's girlfriend and then asking her out later behind your back.
Even if I dont completely agree with your negative take, I appreciate the point your making.

"The ability to play chess is the sign of a gentleman. The ability to play chess well is the sign of a wasted life." applies to a lot of things. How worth is it for me to spend my evenings honing my programming skills, instead of traveling, seeing the world, falling in love?

At the end of the day, there is no preordained path, nor St. Peter at the gate or other God deciding our worth by weighing our heart. Do what is fun for you, no one cares, not even God. The person that played chess all their life, and the person that did something better end up in the same place, forgotten, waiting to be swallowed by our red giant sun.

But if your parents wanted you to become a chess Grandmaster, and you just want to play ball, fuck them, go live your life.
Two summers ago, I went Volvo shopping.

The dealer was absolutely disconnected from his product offerings, and ultimately I left frustrated. The "Inflation Reduction" Act revoked their rebate, which had me balk at Volvo's pricing. Thankfully, I did not purchase a Recharge Hybrid Volvo (they changed mid-year, as did their infotainment provider).
I am not sure if I understand what you by the "frontend server"? I think Tailcall is closer to AppSync than Amplify.

Second part of your question: You can define a set of "allowed headers" that will be automatically forwarded upstream. In your case, you can set the allowed headers to `Authorization`.

Link to the doc:

https://tailcall.run/docs/guides/operators/#allowedheaders
>This is completely overboard. People will always be creative.

Just not in the fields where AI will replace them? Hardly a consolation that "people will always be creative" in e.g. interpretive dancing, if the music in our culture end ups being dominated by AI musak.

And I don't just care for my own music consumption, to be consoled that "some people will still be doing human music". I also care about the role of music in society in general.

I'd say the same for graphic design and illustration. Yeah, some people will be creative in those fields still. But I don't care for a world where 90% of the illustrations and graphic design we see are AI crap.

And I'm not saying it because AI does great illustrations, but because it does crap illustrations cheaper - which for the undiscerning manager will be "good enough", and for spam farms and the like will be a godsend.

>It likely will dramatically kill it and free up those people for other types of jobs as they can now be more productive.

>Humans will still continue to be creative and draw and paint. That won't change.

No, just the ability to make a living out of it, as opposed to getting a drab office or factory job will. That, and being confronted 24/7 by AI "art", would be the changes.

>No reason to hold society back just to hold on to some jobs

Who exactly did sign up for that, and who said this is "forward" and not following it's "holding back"?

Not every BS we invent is a possitive. Nor is "increased technology" == "better".
I can see it being wildly popular. Especially if it can edit photos.

Phone, remove the blemish from this picture.

Phone, make my hair slightly more red, and my waist thinner by one inch.

Phone, tell me who that guy in the background of my pictures is.

Phone, what time do I need to leave to get coffee on my way to work.

Those sorts of things.
Right. This is a convenience problem because the web has no analogue to the browser for publishing content. If publishing content would be as convenient and simple as consuming it, there would be no need for users to flock to publishing services. Most of the centralized services today simplify publishing. Any "community" that forms around them is entirely incidental, and in the case of global social media, mostly harmful.

I think this is a problem the early web should've solved[1]. Now that the centralized model is dominant, most people wouldn't see a reason to change their habits, even if a new solution would be easier and simpler, and not just better on a technical or privacy level (which most people don't care about anyway).

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38659814
Grasp the core ideas related to pointers within the C programming language
I don't know how you'd define "light load", but I have a few services that average about 100rps. Only 1 active container most of the time, they're allocated 128MiB RAM, with a p99 utilization of 55%. They don't have any GC config or special optimization - just operating with regular JSON POST requests, making MongoDB queries

Go just does incredibly well in these kinds of conditions. The only reason we allocate 128MiB is because that's the minimum Google Cloud Run allows - we'd probably go for 64MiB on most systems otherwise
My current client seems to be the opposite of that; dropbox is blocked, but I can share anything through Teams.
"But really the core issue is that most people on mastodon are there specifically to avoid corporate social media."

This statement cuts to the heart of the matter and is at best a half-truth. "Most people" on Mastodon are Twitter refugees. Well over 80% only joined after November 2022. This is a fundamentally different group from the much smaller longtime users.

I do agree that the hardcore users dictate the culture and that this culture emphasizes privacy, safety-ism, is anti-corporate, and so on.

That's fine, but this same mindset pretty much ensures that the status quo of the Fediverse (or Mastodon) remains: niche, tiny, anti-growth.
Go memory model is similar to lower level language, so it's not very hard to reason about.

https://go.dev/ref/mem
Does anyone else think that QT is mostly overkill and HTML is good enough in most cases?
> Maintaining Ruby is a nightmare. Trying to escape that hell now.

The problem with maintaining Ruby is that Ruby is heavily influenced by Perl.
This is a clearly false collection of arbitrary useless and arrogant opinions. See any famous reclusive intellectual or writer for counterexamples.
What to do if your domain at Freenom expires
I'd warn you to be aware that there is so much variety that one person's top 10 list will be another person's "don't ever waste your time" list. I would also warn you that many of the "great" works from the last century did not age well.

I'm not saying this to take away from those works, but to let you know that as you dig in, if you find a few that you really dislike... just put them aside and try another. You'll find the authors and styles you enjoy.
We're definitely very excited about our mission to improve the way we make decisions in this would of information overload and bias!

Would love your opinion / feedback on the app if you've got time!

https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/panora-news/id6463715814
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.panoraapp....

You can drop us an email as well at dhwanit@panoraapp.com
>> The BLM rioting was mostly spontaneous and rag-tag

Sure they were. I wonder why they are otherwise organized and have leadership and full approval of the party which is currently in power?

>> The societal risks to democratic governance differed enormously. Unlike the BLM rioting

Unlike BLM rioting or bombing of the capitol by the far left terrorist they didn't do any property damage or attack other people on the street.
Batteries are a replaceable component, apple doesn't make it easy but it's not particularly harder than any other device. It's not soldered in and doesn't touch the top-case.

Now: if the battery expanded and caused internal damage (bending the top case and damaging the keyboard) then what you said makes sense, but that's a pretty glaring omission if so.