skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Addicts using other addicts to keep their lifestyle, with a third part benefiting economically of it. Another day at the magical realm of Drugsterworld.

People descending to such hell rings, and paying for misery so they have something new to feed to their insatiable "fans", should seek help. Your fans on tiktok aren't really your friends, people.

The only legit reason to do this is to help, not to entertain or to brag.

And the government should take this people from the streets and provide real help to their citizens. Having one missile more or less will not make a difference.
It is weird that for me it kinda depends on item in question.

Slowly keeping rotting wooden ship alive is probably same ship.

But let's take desktop computer. CPU, GPU, RAM, MotherBoard, Case, Powersupply, A disk. What if I replace each of these components over a year with exactly same model. So exactly same CPU for exactly same CPU. And then finally I clone the disk to new disk, but to exactly same model of a disk.

Some serial numbers have changed, but it operates the same, has the same data and software on. And I could even change the license key of software like OS.

Is it same computer or not? And somehow I feel it is not the same.
I often say the French is the C++ of natural languages.
Pathfinder is DnD but better; most others focus on different settings so it depends on your interests I have always liked Cyberpunk 2020.
>Swiss German and Standard High German are entirely different languages

Not a different language but a dialect-group within high german called Alemanic:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alemannic_German

Also interesting:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_German_languages
Ed Roberts: The Secret Father of Modern Computing
Related: PHP “framework” without a framework, a nice starting point to build your own framework:

https://dima.fi/ftframeworks/
> Java (and JavaScript) are too weak.

No, they are not.

People have built, and are still building, amazing products using plain JS. They are also doing so using very simple, lightweight frameworks.

Abstractions are useful and can increase productivity.

The problem is, abstractions have a diminishing return. Using more and more of them stops being useful, and starts becoming detrimental.

But, alas, doing so creates the illusion of productivity, because look at all that code I am writing which doesn't actually solve the business problem, but satisfies the abstraction! Look at how amazingly tall my tech-stack tower is, and nevermind all the SRE hours this monstrosity eats, it's state-of-the-art after all! It also makes people feel very smart, because they learned how all these abstractions work, even though nearly the only application of that knowledge is "how to use these specific abstractions". It also creates moats, which a lot of people seem to like (cue "Looking For Frontend Dev, minimum +6 years experience in framework-that-came-out-last-year" - Joke).

And lastly, "big tech" are using these abstractions, so "This-Is-The-Way", and nevermind that these companies exist, and have to solve, a completely different problem space.
So cool of you!
European heat pump sales are collapsing
Unless you hold the majority of housing in the market, I don’t see how such a large scale collusion can work.
I think this is because french being my native language, hearing this accent on spoken English kind of fall in my ears naturally.
Communicating with humans is also very trial and error, and there are no facts to go by.

It's not that I hate doing it, but if I preferred it over building things, then I'd probably be a project manager instead.
Find me one company that uses either of the languages without a framework and you make your point. I'll wait.
The problem isn't even the hype, it is that every problem now needs to take the shape of the framework. No matter how powerful your framework is, it lends itself to certain problems well and to others not so much.

If all you have is a hammer everyrhing looks like a nail. So instead of openly thinking about what the best solution would be in terms of architecture, interfaces etc, you try to push things into a framework that may or may not fit the problem at hand. If it does, as long as it does: Great.

But to me the answer whether a framework is suited to tackle a specific set of problems is hard to figure out before trying it. Most of the times I tried that answer was: "Yeah you could do that, but it is neither elegant, nor performant and doesn't lead to the UX I aim for.

Maybe this is about the type of things I want to do or the type of person I am, but my experience with every framework ever was cool as long as I did basic things and impossible as soon as I tried something more involved.

So I stick to microframeworks.
Demographics?

https://www.encyclopedia.com/law/legal-and-political-magazin...
Between mlocate and rg I've never felt like I needed anything else.
I somewhere heard that smaller ships were expected to pay themselves back in couple of years. As they really rotted or other ways did not last very long. And actually maintaining and keeping one operational is massive undertaking, even if you do not actively use it too much.
> No, it's a heart-felt, emotional appeal to scared, proud, paranoid, crude, brutal people (who seem to be about half of our neighbors)

Is “about half” an empirical, dispassionate observation? No, it’s a heart-felt, emotional...

I’m pretty sure that Jesus had something to say about seeing the [fascism] in everyone else but yourself.
Done, the company I work at does in several front end applications.

Wow, that didn't take long at all.

Also, take a look at this: https://news.ycombinator.com/hn.js

That's the JS that powers this very well known, and very widely used website. It's all of 152 lines, including whitespace. And it uses plain Javascript. It's so small, and so simple, it doesn't even need to be minified.

So in conclusion, no, JS isn't "too weak", and neither is Java for that matter, and yes people can and are building great products with plain JS. And I write that as someone who really despises both of these languages.
> I have more trouble understanding Indian, Australian than Americans, but it may be due that I watch a lot of American made content and am more used to their accent.

As an Australian who has lived in Europe you are not alone. I had to change the way I talked in order for non native english speakers to understand what I was saying. Australians tend to cut the end of the words off and mix vowel sounds e.g "dinner" gets pronouced as din-na.
It really feels like the author is hampered by the preconceived notion that there are two "camps" in politics. Sure, it may work out that way in US elections due to a fundamentally broken democratic system, but is it that much of a stretch to believe that people can have different opinions on various topics?

In a winner-takes-all system, people don't vote for the person they like most. They vote against the person who's a threat to their way of living, and begrudgingly accept that this means voting for someone they actually quite dislike - but don't actively hate.

Without such a laser focus on "two camps" politics, the author might've been able to realize that it's actually a multi-axis political spectrum. A good start might be "authoritarian vs libertarian" and "capitalism vs collectivism".
What if the function does more than a single allocation? Imagine a library like libxml2 that can parse a whole XML document into a DOM tree. In many cases you it would be nice to just pass an arena allocator and throw away the whole DOM in one go. Unfortunately libxml2's allocator customization kinda sucks and it's not easy to do.
It's the cognitive dissonance version of loss aversion.
Maybe the LLM needs something like dantes Divina Commedia as previous instances describe in condensed forms why a previous prompts conclussions failed, to succesfully navigate around the trained in local minimas. I diary of failure to keep track on how to reach a success.
Yes, reading from all the comments here, this seems like a fact!

I'll have my own introspection in order to try to detect/avoid such a behavior if I do have it!
Half-OT: anyone building an agent based coding team you can talk to via issues/PRs?
> The question is whether to build it yourself.

And document it yourself, and maintain it yourself, and build an ecosystem of extension for it yourself, and create video tutorials for it yourself, and ...

A minimalist off-the-shelf framework can go a long way.

I like frameworks that do not do much more than provided by their libraries that get exposed by it. So I can always swap out libraries, or carry a long certain libraries after moving on from the framework.
Its just a robot arm, $4k seems on the ball to me. These things have been around for decades in the auto (car) industry. Maybe $20k if you include development costs, but these dev costs will be $0k over the coming years.

My issue is with leaving a tip for robots! (hopefully less staff means more tips for each of them?)
for first: firefox + umatrix, you're welcome
Typically the copyright of the recordings derives from the copyright of the performance, and only indirectly from that of the original classical piece. Most recordings are copyrighted, but that’s because recording technology only became hugely prevalent during existing copyright terms.

Looking at it another way, an uncreative recording of a classical performance will be copyrighted for a period of time, but after it expires, a recording of the recording won’t add any further copyright. It’s a bit like how a photograph of a public domain painting is uncopyrightable, but a new painting based on the painting might be copyrightable.
Good and bad itself depends on the perspective. Good for Hasbro? Can be argued I guess, depends also on its current economic situation and a lot of things other people may indeed not have the best knowledge about. Good for the players and fans of DnD? Good for those who actually work in the company and got laid off, or the remaining staff there? Almost surely not. This decision is not taken on their behalf and does not serve them in any way. And considering the popularity of DnD there is no surprise that the issue is going to be approached from an employee or player perspective rather than an investor or manager one.
I kind of agree with your ideas. That being said, and with the best of intentions...

Everyday users (not government or big tech or anything) are down voting you because of your grandiose tone and unoriginal point of view.

It looks like you are having some issues with delusions and maybe even paranoia. Take it easy. Maybe go talk to a professional.

Best of luck.
I particularly like the Arecibo message part. Shame the OG site doesn't seem to be up, but glad there's a waybackmachine link in the post
A simple, naive solution I've seen proposed would enable copyright extension on an exponential fee scale.

This has the nice side effect of wildly-successful works disproportionately funding the copyright offices, thus enabling theoretically lower fees for newcomers.
I used Google way back in the day for a custom domain, but eventually got off that bandwagon and decided to host my own. Found that hosting my own was great for receiving emails, but a huge pain for sending. Eventually had to give that up too. I've used ProtonMail with that same custom domain since 2016. The mobile apps, web interface, and features have all gotten much better over time. That being said, I don't use a lot of personal emails anymore, and am considering iCloud from Apple. The only reason where I think iCloud is an improvement is because when signing up for an account that requires an email, Apple will automatically generate a 'relay' address for me. These relay addresses can be deleted at anytime, which solves the "unsubscribe from mailing list" that no company has ever honored. And really, that's all I look for in personal email provider. A way to make sure I only get a handful of messages in my inbox a week, and all the spam gets trashed.
That feeling is the one that's important, I feel. None of these things exist in that way the first place, but we pretend, and we agree on these pretenses. This is how the human mind copes with the stimuli it gets.

With regards to computers, I have different things in my mind. For the feeling part, the computer's role is what matter. "My main desktop computer", "My main server computer", "My work laptop". I can know that they are not the same, but they feel similar enough, because they play the same role for me, so for the most part, I don't make a difference.
Quite often this results in poorly designed systems that are hard to maintain or change. As those doing the initial work and design never had to struggle with changing poorly made systems.

And as they are not present, they do not take blame for the issues caused by them.
One of the main motivators of people looking for strong leadership is fear and mostly a purely emotional need. Mostly fear of being taken advantage of. But yes, it also doesn't have to be irrational, it just was for the most prominent instance of fascism.

Using your mind and getting some distance and perspective would be quite beneficial here. The heart can follow the mind or the other way around. There isn't a clear cut and there cannot be a general answer which direction is the better one.

What probably is true in almost any case is that if you have an image of an enemy to put all the blame on, he probably just looks at you from the mirror.
Whenever I see a project using something like this it’s always full of insecure, unmaintainable garbage code. It's not that it's impossible to build a good codebase in vanilla PHP, it's just that the kind of person that wants to do it is typically a mid with an inflated ego thinking they're going to be the next Taylor Otwell.

One of PHP’s key advantages is lower cost of maintenance, and it’s much easier to achieve that by using Laravel or Symfony.
Seemless is a free LinkTree alternative
The Trump situation has forced me to re-evaluate. I was highly critical of GW, but to be fair I think he was genuinely trying to do the best for the US and its interests at the time. I don’t buy the idea that he was totally corrupt and only in it for himself and his cronies. We’ve actually seen what that really looks like now. He just had a distorted idea of what the national interests were, and too few scruples in pursuing those interests, as he saw them. He couldn’t see the negative effects, or discounted them too much.
CLIs are simply wizard at character building. Let's not keep them to ourselves
Yeah I know. The best way I learn is to work a specific problem and/or be able to look at something already working.
It's been addressed multiple times (e.g. here: https://proton.me/blog/climate-activist-arrest). The IP address in question was a signup address, which we need to keep temporarily in order to keep the services working properly and prevent abuse. As any other legally operating company, we need to comply with the local legislation, and we've been transparent about it: https://proton.me/legal/transparency. If anonymity is part of your threat model, we recommend using a no-logs VPN service or Tor to hide your actual IP address: https://proton.me/blog/use-protonmail-anonymously.
Imagine it costs $3/month to provide the service to a customer and the customer is paying $3/month.

You can make a good case that most of your costs are fixed. So that if you have 100x as many customers it’ll cost you $0.03/month to provide the same service to the customers, but they still pay $3/month.

You need VC money to acquire customers and grow. Then your business will become profitable because of the economics of scale that are inherent to software.
Frameworks have come a long way in the last 10 years.

Component based architecture has simplified so much, compared to the endless permutations of MVC, MVP, MVVM, etc.
I'd be happy to consider it. There are a number of good technical and non-technical advantages:

* Strong, mature eco-system

* VM-based so we can easily change OS and/or other dev-ops related params.

* Large hiring pool with lots of experience in it (at least this is the case locally)

* More performant than Python, which would maybe be the next language that hits all three of these points.

Your counter-question also deflects and doesn't answer my original question: what problems can not be solved in Java without frameworks? What are examples of lego problems and duplo problems?

Maybe it's a misreading on my part, but I would interpret a "duplo" language as one I could not even build a framework in, due to a lack of low-level control.
This article paints a very negative picture. It might feel "safe" to always focus on the bad things, but optimists typically get more done. Would Torvalds ever have started working on the Linux kernel if he wasn't an enormous optimists? He says that he is an enormous optimist in [1]. Similarly, Robert Noyce (Intel cofounder) said: "an essential ingredient of innovation. How else can the individual welcome change over security, adventure over staying in safe places?"

And if you take off the dark colored glasses, there are things to be optimistic about. For example, in response to the Freedom House picture. The world is a power law. Statistics about total numbers of countries paint only half the picture because some small dictatorial countries matters less than huge countries such as the USA or Germany with liberal democracies. Compared to the 1950's, for example, Japan and South Korea have become a friend of the West, which is a major win for everybody if you ask me.

In general, I rather live in 2023 than 1990. Entertainment, healthcare, transportation, and availability of knowledge are all much better. Yes, some people end up using things they might regret later, but that doesn't hold for everybody.

A more productive mindset, I think, is to pick some "bad" things and focus on trying to make those things a little bit better. It's the "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade". Yes, there are some real problems, but it's not all bad. Only chipping away at the problems will solve them.

[1]: https://youtu.be/OvuEYtkOH88
Sadly the domain name was from Freenom. All of the names registered with them have gone. I can't find a way to get my Mali domains back.
There's a large crossover between magic players and software developers, so there are a huge amount of great tools. The ones I currently use are:

- https://cubecobra.com for inspiration. There are draftbots but they are not very good.
- https://draftmancer.com the ideal way to draft online or against bots
Bah, cheap and weak. But sure, the hill is yours, strong warrior.
It's interesting that they say skill is about finding good trades -- my perception from playing a few times is that there's a lot of subtlety in how many of what you offer, and how the information that you have those cards changes others views about which suit is the goal suit. A successful strategy I've pursued playing with other friends who have never played before is just selling all my cards for >=$5 and making a small, consistent profit.
Why attach this to an IDE? I would think that simply letting an LLM control a terminal and make a commit would be the better approach.

I recently tried it with "You are in a directory with a web app that does ... and you want to implement feature .... In each step, you can use ls or any other bash command and I will give you the output".

It was pretty hillarious how the LLM found its way around the codebase with ls, cat, find, grep awk and actually even managed to edit the code that way and do a commit.

Giving the LLM a bit better tools, like a version of "cat" that prefixes the lines with numbers, and a "swap" command that can do "swap 179 250 ..." to swap out the lines 179 to 250 with "..." would probably be enough to empower the LLM to be pretty efficient.

The next step might be to let the LLM manage its context window by allowing it to remove the last output with a command like "forget". So when the LLM does "cat somefile" and realizes that the output is not interesting, it can follow up with "forget" so the output will be replaced with "You deemed the output to be not interesting".

Those tools would probably evolve to make coding and managing the context window more and more efficient. Like "nicecat 100 200" to see the lines 100 to 200 with numbers prefixed. "keep 200 300" to forget the last output except lines 200 to 300 etc.
le Figaro would be more like the Wall Street Journal, it's right wing.

Le Monde is more leftwing, maybe NYT, and WaPo would be like Liberation (very left)
If the library reallocates non-trivial objects, it may need a more sophisticated reallocation function, that does not simply bitwise copy a block to its new location. Some additional work may be needed (e.g. pointer fixup). The reallocation function could take a "move constructor" callback as parameter.
This would be very cool, if it worked for me.
I tried this in firefox first and it downloaded something according to the log, but nothing was displayed and the downloaded gltf file was 800 bytes and seemed to contain only a "sun" object, no mesh.

In chrome instead, nothing gets downloaded at all, it hangs at

> Fetching glTF 0/10

In the console, one can find

Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Failed to fetch
at ha.load (index.f704be55.js:3581:132050)
at index.f704be55.js:3581:208771
at new Promise (<anonymous>)
at ev._loadLibrary (index.f704be55.js:3581:208749)
at ev._initDecoder (index.f704be55.js:3581:209106)
at ev.preload (index.f704be55.js:3581:208814)
at new Hx (index.f704be55.js:3581:181131)
at Tx.parse (index.f704be55.js:3581:165923)
at Object.onLoad (index.f704be55.js:3581:164332)
at index.f704be55.js:3581:133292
True, but Go codebases only look the same because there's only so many ways to make a neolithic handaxe.
In my experience, this is mostly a JVM issue. When I code in the JVM, I feel like I fight my frameworks and libraries more often than writing actual code. Looking at you in particular, Spring Boot.

I had similar experiences in C#.NET and Python (especially SQLAlchemy), albeit less often and less frustrating.

In Golang, the frameworks and libraries tend to stay out of your way. I feel way more productive.

The trade-off is that I am writing more boilerplate. IMO that is a worthwhile tradeoff, especially since things tend to then be more explicit. More explicit is nice for maintenance anyway.
Also, with how far AI code helpers have come, boilerplate is even less of an issue.
I hear there are plans to fix that.

In the meantime you can get async profiler to output in JFR format and combine it with a separate JFR recording.
Now that you say it: some decades ago there was a racist tendency in France where people where having fun of others accent.

They where having fun of the southern marseillais accent, but also of the northern ch'ti accent, they also had extra fun of African or Quebec's accent indeed.

I, as a child, did imitated those accent for fun. I now regret it, bit it's still in the roots of a lot of people.

I sometimes fear that racism is predominant in french society.
You are answering a different question. Opting for Java is smart, albeit incredibly boring. Doing so is basically choosing to go with Spring Boot, at the same time.

You are going to do that because the Java programmers need it, Java needs it and if you don't, as another writer here said: you'll be writing all the frameworks yourself and at considerable cost.

So hating frameworks and picking Java is a dubious position.
> divide people into 16 intersectional categories

This seems like an oxymoron.

People seem to go way out of their way to misunderstand intersectionality for some reason.

Probably makes their entire essay up to that point nonsensical if they allowed themselves to understand the meaning of the word, so instead he needs to make himself look foolish.

Also, the bit that could be paraphrased as "us Jews don't believe in identity politics because we prefer to treat people as individuals" is almost that scene from Life of Brian where one guy denies he's an individual.