skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not familiar with .NET, but I've done this for Java.

There is nothing magical about the JIT, you can let it warm up, suspend the process and look at the compiled code with a debugger (prepare to be disappointed though). When working with primitive arrays, its not very different from C. Lack of value types / reinterpreting memory is a big problem for Java, but not so much for C# IIRC. Fingers crossed for project Valhalla :)

The only thing that is kind of opaque is the GC, you need to learn the basics of how the algorithm works. There are some surprising relevations, like time of GC being proportional to surviving objects, not dead ones. Not to mention the new generation of GCs which use all kinds of tricks inside their read/write barriers to trade a little bit of throughput for low latency.
Bollywood: AI may affect India's film industry
In many countries people get killed for a Phone (or much less)
Just that you know the world is not the sq foot where you live now.
OT: As a high school student I read a lot of philosophy books, but I always stayed away from Leibniz's Monadology, it sounded too bizarr and esoteric.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monadology

But Lee Smolin come up with an interesting interpretation:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-to-understand-the-univers...
If that's your reason for using Rust then safety is as useful in a GUI toolkit as anywhere else (indeed I'd say more so - GUI toolkits tend to involve lots of hierarchies and callbacks that make it easy to get confused about ownership, or get into unexpected states).
https://github.com/tarik-celik/wifi-bear
> What's relatively unusual is this new crop of 'all that matters is TC' types who view the industry as a means to get loaded and who do not, in any way shape or form, embody the hacker ethos and the mentality of putting something out there for the public good because that's just the type of person they are.

I said that people working a job should be compensated fairly. So they have a roof over their head, and don't worry about where their next meal will come, or what will happen with them when they are old. I'm glad that from here you jumped to the conclusion that 'all that matters is TC'.
The easy fix would be to do something familiar to genetic algorithms - fish out things that are unpopular at random and give them 10% of results. On facebook or the like, do that for things that people DON'T want to see (conservative content for a progressive, for example).

This doesn't require a substantive change to the existing algorithms, so it shouldn't break (many) things.
There have been a few of those already, for at least a decade. IIRC, there was some weather app that crowdsourced readings from users with certain motorola phones and gave shockingly granular weather.
This past summer, I budgeted $120 for an air fryer [if you haven't used one, do].

Ultimately, I walked out of WallyWorld with their $24.00 entry-level unit — because it has physical knob controls. Not a digital circuit in sight, and when I need tendies crisped [chef's kiss] PERFECTO. It even has a real bell which [dings].
It wasn't "one tree" was it, it was years and years of interlocking stories and scams, all of which were fake. The whole claim that Russia was promoting Trump was a part of that lie, but you don't seem able to let go of it.
> However, now I have this problem where the print lifts on certain regions of the bed

If it's the edges of wide, flat prints, search for problems with "warping". Draughts and uneven heating can cause it, especially combined with poor adhesion to the bed.
Kia Canada withholding deliveries to game sales number (CBC Invest. Report)
This is interesting. I went off and searched for paragraph vector code and indeed find doc2vec stuff, including tutorials referring to the paper such as https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/auto_examples/howtos/run_doc.... It’s not obvious that the results aren’t reproducible (and I realise code is not the same as published results), but I wonder if you could steer us more specifically.
I don’t think “brainrape” is a good description as employees leave of their own choice.

The corporation isn’t paramount, the individual is. Saying Apple “brainraped” Marino because Masimo didn’t want the employees to leave with their skills leaves out the very important part that employees wanted to leave.

Companies should be able to hire away key talent because it helps the talent who get hired away. As well as the talent who stay.
Very custom, to the point that the current iteration is dependent enough on a bunch of details of my environment (part of this is an ongoing drive towards minimalism - e.g. the editor doesn't know how to open files or select buffers or select themes; all of those things are delegated to scripts that currently use rofi) to the point I'm not convinced it'll even start on someone. I'm slowly cleaning it up to at least pretend it might work for someone else, but that means also deciding on a cleaner interface to the helper scripts so I don't have to package up my entire environment in one go.

The beauty of the DrB part of it, though, is that the shell of that is very small: Just spawn a DrB server, spawn a client, and wrap the client in a begin/rescue block with binding.pry, and put any critical data on the server side. Suddenly your server-side is near crash-proof and your data much less likely to disappear. If you want an extra level of protection, run a threat on the server side to checkpoint the data regularly (I used to checkpoint it every 5 seconds at the start; it's now at around 5 minutes, which also means every buffer I've opened and not bothered to kill from the last 5-6 years are still accessible... I never bothered to add code to clean them up as they just don't take up much space)
The whole point of an appliance is that it runs a single application. Go does not have any sort of networking stack. This comment is 100% nonsense.
New AI is powerful and uncensored Let's run it [video]
Maybe asking for the ID is a ruse. They already intended to close the account, they just want your ID so you can’t open another one.
(2021)

Some previous discussions on similar articles fwiw:

Learning chess at 40 (2016)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31433914

(69 comments)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20154285

(82 comments)

On Learning Chess as an Adult – From 650 to 1750 in Two Years (2020,338 comments)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25108800

How to get good at chess fast (2013, 65 comments)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10695748
Obviously people sort on intelligence into different industries. You’re looking at a paper on similar/probably-mostly-identical sorting happening between specific firms.

I don’t believe everyone working in e.g. food service is dumb (nor that everyone working in adtech or HFT is smart), only that the distribution is probably quite extremely uneven.

There is plenty of space for creativity and novel thinking within bureaucracies, trades, service industries, etc., and that is exactly the reason it’d be great to have a more even distribution of smart people into them.

An efficient bureaucrat can navigate themselves to the right place to make a huge amount of impact on people’s actual daily lives at scale. That’s a good thing!
> because they felt like people would pay more.

but if that was true, why did it happen only during the pandemic and not before?

At any point in time, if a business felt like their customer could've paid more, the business should be increasing that price. So the recent price rises cannot be explained with this train of argument.

Unless, of course, the pandemic somehow made it so that people could pay more.
> Are you trying to say if only a few outliers bomb a building is somehow ok?

No. That's false-dichotomy thinking, along the lines of, "It HAS to be either A or B, and it's not B, so it MUST be A."

> Or because they were far left terrorist its nothing to worry about?

No. They're both bad. But:

1. The BLM rioting was mostly spontaneous and rag-tag, whereas Jan. 6 was orchestrated by the then-Commander in Chief of the U.S. armed forces, aided and abetted by his acolytes in and out of government (including outsiders such as the Proud Boys); and

2. The societal risks to democratic governance differed enormously. Unlike the BLM rioting, Jan. 6 could conceivably have played out like the October Revolution in the Russia of 1917, where an armed Leninist minority seized power and displaced the Kerensky provisional government that had itself taken control in the wake of the February Revolution. [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_Revolution
It's still a systematic "issue"... If it is virtually impossible to find a great or optimal move (even given enough time) without having to memorize tons of specific situations first that's kinda annoying.
It's a similar thing with competitive programming. At first the problems are solvable by thinking, but at some point you just need to memorize (or even copy paste) a solution that someone else figured out first... Boring.
Yeah but Qt does a lot more, to match Qt you would need a similar effort. I remember some time ago was a popular article shared here on how hard it is to render text when you need to consider all the languages and all the font types and all the options. So it wold be easy to paint some shapes and some english text in the happy case and it would probably be enough for video games but then you need Widgets that will work with different user preferences, different languages, different color schemes, different DPIs, different platform conventions. Then you want to access the clipboard, the App settings folder, the notification system, maybe embed a webview to show soem html content ... Qt does a lot of things if your job is to make a professional complex Desktop application starting from basic building blocks and wasting your time on the Widgets and platform stuff then on business logic is not a good investment. If you are a hobist and writing Rust makes you super happy then I invite yout o continue.
> Indeed, we worked very hard to make it work despite his skepticism.

In this case why the authors of the seq2seq paper did not mention him in their massive acknowledgement section?
> If one requires interrupting 6 other people to maintain flow

Where is this "6" coming from?

Again:

1) You may be incapable of doing work when someone walks next to you, but this is not the case of a lot of people. It's like driving and then going like: 'Gee, when these cars are putting their blinking lights on and it is distracting me, they should all quickly park before I arrive'.

2) My flow is fine, thank you very much: I don't get distracted by people passing by AND I also rarely ask quick simple questions (people needs to understand my work rather than me needing to understand theirs). It's telling that you cannot conceive that someone may disagree with you without themselves participating to a caricatural behavior that you have in mind.

3) THAT'S EXACTLY MY POINT: the world doesn't revolve only around anyone. If you are inconvenienced by something that is convenient by someone else, then, outside of your little person, THERE IS NO REASON TO CHANGE THAT. If situation A means that employee X gets 6/10 and employee Y gets 8/10, and if situation B means that employee X gets 8/10 and employee Y gets 6/10, then situations A and B are the same.

4) I know that your argument is that your inconvenience is huuuuuge and touch everyone in the office and that the benefice for the distractor is smaaaaal and that the distractor is a terrible human being that should be thrown in jail. That's what self-centered people tends to believe.
That sounds only slightly less plausible than using it to hack and blow up a nuclear power plant. A scenario against which the MacBook has zero protections in place.
That’s pretty much the opposite of how I feel. I can win against much stronger players over the board than online. It’s so hard to summon the same focus and energy in an online game.
No buddy. I've looked up and verified sources in the past, just not willing to do so conversing with you in this particular discussion, especially since your reasoning which was just making assumptions was not very convincing. Thankfully others have already provided better sources.
> Figma the product was built with the the money they raised.

Ok. But do you think that is the only way it could have been built? Somehow you are sidestepping that question.
thanks, I didn't know that, I love i3!
Standards bodies like IETF and the W3C also play a crucial roles and are in some aspects the worst offenders when it comes to promoting centralization via standards. So seeing an RFC that's the product of multiple layers of centralization talk about that topic seems very ironic.

They do address this in the RFC, but only briefly and I don't think to a sufficient enough extent.

If you want to get rid of centralisation one of the most effective things to do is ignoring standards bodies. Of course that may be detrimental to end-users in other ways (e.g. non-iteroperability).
I think using Postgres as a runtime would feel like a PaaS runtime not much different from other offerings in the market. But, for something self-hosted, it feels like super powers in the beginning.
Yeah, you need to have a clear target and aim while starting. Milestones start to show themselves once you're experienced enough.

While we're at it, experience is also a must. Everybody starts from the bottom, and needs to work their way up, and I found kaizen is a great way to do it.
5/7ths of the weight usually is not enough to move something to the tiny category.
agony can kill
or
agony can sustain life
The delays should not be noise-like.

Determine, say, N = 10 points in the sensitive part of the algorithm. On startup / library initialization, assign N small random delays to these points. The delays stay the same in every invocation, creating a stable and unique timing profile. This,profile is hard / impossible to reproduce on a different machine for analysis and finding correlations. To make things funnier, a random delay parameter should randomly change every few weeks on long-running installations. This would render previous timing stats invalid, making known-plaintext attacks more difficult.
Couldn’t that upset users?

Leading them to other platforms or installing ad blocker like solutions to avoid unwanted content.
I've used git as usual to evolve my SQL functions and procedures and my CI/CD pipeline used Pyrseas to sync code with database.
The number 0 is interesting in the sense that it is actually a comparatively late and abstract invention. The natural numbers are also mathematically defined as either including or excluding 0 depending on the author.

That said the issue is really in-band signaling. “I already have this data type which I don’t fully use, let’s use one of the unused values to represent something completely unrelated..”
> also misses an obvious reason

Isn’t it just following the stock and bond markets just with a whole lot more volatility?
> if the person who has the knowledge FAILED to document it properly and give it to the person who needs it. Then the person who has the knowledge is the one who deserve to have their flow disrupted instead of the person who notice they haven't done their work

Hard agree!

> But more importantly, a grown-up would say: the two persons are collaborating, they are not fighting each other. The person who has knowledge is a grown-up, they will want the work to progress correctly and they will want to see their colleague succeed professionally and socially. The person who needs the knowledge is a grown-up, they will not ask over and over again when they see it disturbs the person who has the knowledge (and no one here is against that, obviously).

Hard agree!

> In short: grown-ups understand that communication is messy and that "counting points" is just ridiculous, inefficient

Agreed. However, as engineers, if we see communication within the team being messy, you also need to judge is that okay, or could we improve it, by setting some ground rules or improving some process or maybe having more dedicated sessions for creating a good shared understanding. OP's thread, it felt to me, thought that messiness in communication was solvable only by being on-prem and able to ask quick questions, while I am convinced it can be solved far more elegantly and with less overall effort with a good, focused onboarding experience and even (or especially) in remote settings.
> Not familiar with .NET, but I've done this for Java.

Java only has intrinsics for core jdk APIs and some auto-vectorization (which in my experience are between very hard to impossible to use reliably). A proper Vector API is in the works but that is waiting for Valhalla (value objects).

https://openjdk.org/jeps/460
It's not, it's a very odd issue in the middle of laying down a layer line, where a tiny mm raises/blisters, then in the next layer the raised part gets a bit longer, then a bit longer, until it becomes a big hole within twenty layers of this. It's very odd.
I've been the same way for as long as I can remember. It applies to single player games, too.

I've found that there are some games that losing isn't completely off-putting. But I think the real issue is that the fun I get from most games is in winning, not in playing. If I was playing for not reason (not to win, no goals, etc) I wouldn't play it, and would do something else instead. Winning makes it feel enough better than I want to play.

I've been trying to "overcome" this, too, and having the right mindset is start. "I'm here to enjoy the game, not the win.", etc.

Good luck. :)
Actually maximizing $/hour would mean paying minimal attention to the questions, and giving repetitive answers - "1%, 1%, 1%, 1%, ..." or similar.

In current-day America, a more plausible reason for malicious answers would be the culture wars - many respondents might want to bias the survey results, to somehow favor their own "side".
How clean the syntax looks is one of the least important things about a programming language. I don’t know why you’re so hung up on it. But yes, Rust’s syntax is more complex than that of C.

Nobody has ever advertised Rust as “C with simpler syntax” so I’m not sure why you expected that.
No, it was defo in one of the two places I mentioned, but The Story of Mel is great.

I like how they called them desk-sized not because they were the right size to sit on a desk, but because they took as much floor space as a desk:
https://www.masswerk.at/nowgobang/images/lgp-30-features.jpg
If the money borrowed is not spent on investments, then they would have to use after-tax money to pay the interest.

This after-tax money needs to have been pre-tax money at some point, so therefore, they do pay taxes at some point. Just not income tax presumably, but something akin to capital gains tax (e.g., sell off some of their assets/equity to pay interest). It's a lower tax rate, but in absolute terms, it's still a large numbner.
The (admittedly vague article) said it was "wiped," though. By whom?
Thank you for this story - I was this close to get aboard and ask all my 42 employees to get one, now we will move forward to researching different solution.
Do you sandbox them? I wouldn't trust random apps running on my PC
Bay Area Costcos have $3600 bottle of wine
Regardless of being grandfathered in (allowed), you should update your drier to a 4-prong cord/outlet (which is ACTUALLY grounded). This does not always require stringing an entire new circuit — NEC (US) allows driers to be grounded with just a single 10awg wire.

Particularly if you operate rentals, the legal liability is perhaps almost as much as NOT retrofitting GFCIs into baths/kitchens.

SRC: not your electrician
Yes for the most part in the modern economy gold is also a non productive speculatory asset/token just like bitcoin.
Or "they" refers to the customer?
I didn’t say tech, nor did I suggest there aren’t intelligent (sometimes even extremely intelligent) people working in trades etc. Nor do I think we need supergeniuses working at restaurants.

What I’m suggesting is that we shouldn’t have, increasingly, one end of our economy operated largely by 90-110 IQ folks and one end operated largely by 120+ IQ folks. Especially when the end operated by the 90-110 folks is the one that 99% of people are actually interacting with on a daily basis and when the 120+ IQ end has a propensity to produce extremely intense, near-zero sum competitions that drive the net value of their intelligence to near-zero.
> storefront in a mall

rent for "storefront in a mall" > any revenue you would make even if your door never closed 24/7
Have you seen inequality statistics?
> interoperability is not impossibly hard

Who ever argued it was? Apple never claimed they wouldn’t bring iMessage to Android because it was hard. Them making an Android app would be trivial, they simply choose not to. Which I disagree with, but that doesn’t mean I have to agree with Beeper’s approach.

> apple really doesn't care about the security or privacy of their customers as much as they like to say they do

That’s a bogus argument from Beeper. Why would Apple trust them? Beeper probably isn’t siphoning messages from user’s devices to spy on them but Apple doesn’t know that, none of us do. And if they allow that use, the app that comes next might be nefarious.

> For most companies I would say imessage is locked to apple devices because it's about the money but apple is one of those companies that takes weirdly principled positions even when it makes no sense

https://www.techemails.com/p/imessage-for-android
When you buy car, fly planes, or shop at Amazon, you do not get a discount for living in a low cost of living area.

So the bigger number matters because many products are the same price ecerywhere in the world.
Fastmail or Protonmail, based on personal preferences.
I have never experienced more perfect irony than reading a sentence about paywalls and then immediately scrolling the paywall into view.
Why? Can you give a few examples?
I wonder if it is poor countries. Or is it lower income countries.

If you have enough food, clothing, housing and entertainment. And you don't see too many people doing a lot better you can be pretty happy.
They informed people immediately, and then several years later.