skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That’s kind of what I had in mind, I don’t really know if it’s feasible or not but if I had billions of dollars deposited in my Robinhood account just made the order for that many shares, would it not go through?
I’ve been a reviewer and occasionally written reviews a bit like you describe.

Papers are an exercise in communicating information to the paper’s readers. If the writing makes it very difficult for the audience to understand that information, the paper is of little use and not suitable for publication regardless of the quality of the ideas within.

It is not the reviewer’s job to rewrite the paper to make it comprehensible. Not only do reviewers not have time, it is not their job.

Writing is not easy, and writing technical papers is a genuinely difficult skill to learn. But it is necessary for the work to be useful.

To be honest, it sounds like the teacher who suggested you write the paper let you down and wasted your time. Either the work was worth their time to help you revise it in to publishable form, or they shouldn’t have suggested it in the first place.
wtf, $200/month really? that's pretty ridiculous.

Unions are good in theory, but in practice I'm not so sure.
Maybe you could stop being lazy and explain specifically why what I claimed was wrong.

But you can't, because you're wrong and you know it.
The notion is not that Masimo owned those executives or employees, the notion is that Apple needed the particular skills and expertise of those employees in order to build what they built.
I haven't driven a Tesla, but perhaps the interface is more intuitive? I feel like on VW and others with terrible interfaces, it was more of an afterthought, kinda like a web app that spent $200k on the API and then had a budget of $10k for the front end that needed to go live in a couple of weeks.
When I bought my 2015 Mazda 3, there were already articles on how they had found buttons and the dial superior to touchscreen only. They were quick on that and now have a decade more work going into it.

Every few years since then there has been an article like this that another brand "discovered" the same thing.
Demanding from whom? The current government could not cook an egg.
Same as every other company, you file some papers with the SEC and make a stock offering
(also a driver of a 2023 id4): That switch between rear and front windows is mindbogglingly terrible UX.

Other bad UX:

I also only have one user profile setup and I have to hit "okay" every time I start my car.

The self parking feature works maybe 40% of the time.

You cannot disable child locks independently, it's either on or off.

The alert that my phone is charging everytime I put it into the wireless charging spot.

Cannot disable assists without disabling acc.
Hype can be deserved, not always dismissive
These are not necessary the same people ;)
Yet GM still gave them millions
We are changing how things are being done. Before NASA was responsible for everything and more hands on approach but now it is hands off approach with fixed cost contract. Because of this you can expect things to work the same way as before but that doesn't mean it is good to keep the tabs on.
It seems I misunderstood the article. I'm happy to read this in any case, thanks for the follow up!
Cheers, will do.
Yes (with a lot of small print)!

Good news is that we're already chatting with two print houses about printing around 1k copies (test print basically). The plan is to give these away on various events / conferences, or to local communities.

Bad news is that we'll be able to only send these to EU, and only in large batches (like 100 copies to one place), and not individually.

Good news is that we'll make the printer-house-friendly PDFs available for anyone who wants to print a batch and given them away (or sell them for the cost of making).

And I also have this idea to chat with various companies for them to make a sponsor-batch of zines to print and give away, e.g. on events they sponsor. Not sure how much interest there will be.

We also plan to make a nice "collector's" high-quality print of a bundle edition (e.g. 4 issues in one "book") to help get some money into the project. Same as PoC||GTFO did (shoutout to these folks), though we'll probably go with a kickstarter or sth.

Now, the elephant in the room: selling individual issues in a consistent always-available way ← that's something we're discussing from time to time. At this moment we're not there yet, as the logistics and accounting stuff of this operation would be pretty huge. I'm also thinking of approaching some local magazine publishers in some countries with a deal like "hey, we have PDFs, wanna print and sell these for a %?".

So yeah, it's complicated™ ;)
I'm completely out of the loop on the current state of Dropbox but from context clues I'm guessing it's been plowed under by enshittification?
Yes, that has been one of my biggest gripes with our Ford Fusion. The seat heater control is on the touch screen which is (a) not very responsive or accurate when cold and (b) taken over by the rear view camera when backing up. If you miss the seat heat button, it goes to another view where the buttons move and are only slightly bigger. Almost all of the climate and radio controls are mirrored in touch buttons under the screen that also can't be felt while driving or operated with gloves.

I really like the climate controls on my slightly older Jetta, with three knobs: temp, fan, and position. The left- and right-most knobs have a button in the center that controls the heated seats. VW had a perfect system and I hope more automakers rediscover knobs and buttons soon.
We should have sold it to China instead.
Lawmakers question why Apple doesn't provide outside authorization to their default secure messaging app, or provide their own secure means of messaging non-Apple hardware a family member might be provided by their cell carrier.

The answer seems to be Apple wants to force families to purchase an iPhone for every family member, or download and agree to the terms of a third-party app in order to securely communicate.
I'm not even trash talking unions. I love unions because I love the idea of workers being lazy (unironically!)

But, from the buyers perspective, I don't want union hands touching my car. I also will NEVER buy a volvo because they're bad cars from every standpoint except safety. This is the brand that though a turbo, supercharged hybrid drive-train would be a good idea in an SUV. The SUV isn't even that fast despite it!
A lot of medicine requires $100's of millions of R&D, with a high chance of failure. No company would take that risk if their work wasn't protected. So at least in some fields, it spurs innovation.
I have the climate control to resume, so I don't often need to adjust it.

I also use the siri shortcut to start climate control a few minutes before I leave the house.
I believe that's what Cory Doctorow calls 'enshittification'. I don't blame UX designers and Figma for it though, and I think this comes from the corporate stakeholders rather than the PMs. Full disclosure, I'm a PM similarly annoyed by the enshittification of once excellent apps. Maybe too many large companies are stuck releasing features on a regular cadence without many interesting user problems to solve.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enshittification#%3A%7E%3Atext...
There is a sea of distance between the UI on a Tesla, and the UI on the Volkswagen. The lack of buttons in a Tesla is mildly annoying but everything is still pretty usable.

On the VW the software is so bad it makes you want to scream in despair, and the buttons they do have are the worst of both worlds: unclear, unresponsive, no feedback, and invisible in the dark.
The best UI on a gadget more complicated than a toaster that I've experienced was on a Maytag commercial washer/dryer combo. Just knobs, no buttons, let alone capacitive buttons or touch screens. Reminiscent of the old dumb machines but a sprinkling of smarts that made it better, not more complicated.

It also shows the power of a good vendor. My uncle had a dealer he knew well and trusted, so bought them sight unseen when his old ones broke. Probably paid extra for the commercial line rather than the consumer line, but I assume they will last way longer too.
Agree that this is how papers are often judged, but strong disagree on how this is how papers should be judged. This is exactly the problem of reviewers looking for the keys under the lamp post (does the paper check these boxes), versus where they lost the keys (should this paper get more exposure because it advances the field).

The fact that the first doesn't lead more to the second is a failure of the system.

This is the same sort of value system that leads to accepting job candidates with neat haircuts and says the right shibboleths, versus the ones that make the right bottom line impact.

Basically, are "good" papers that are very rigorous but lead to nothing actually "good"? If your model of progress in science is that rigorous papers are a higher probability roll of the dice, and nonrigorous papers are low probability rolls of the dice, then we should just look for rigorous papers. And that a low-rigor paper word2vec actually make progress was "getting really lucky" and we should have not rated the paper well.

But I contend that word2vec was also very innovative, and that should be a positive factor for reviewers. In fact, I bet that innovative papers have a hard time being super rigorous because the definition of rigor in that field has yet to be settled yet. I'm basically contending that on the extreme margins, rigor is negatively correlated with innovation.
The blog is quite technical and gives a lot of details.

"we easily sustained a load of more than 250,000 writes and more than 500,000 reads for about an hour. During the tests, we could still see single command execution time of around 100 microseconds, while the memory usage was well under 70 percent"

and with the Memorystore Redis Cluster, it reduced cost and improved performance.

"Significantly reduced costs AND improved performance - By converting from 9 x 64 GB nodes to 20 x 13 GB nodes, we are able to save about 66% in total costs AND see three times more performance."
I also have rotary phones, use vintage radios, prefer vintage appliances, and listen to vinyl.

I thought I was a little odd - nope, I'm just a normal level of odd in comparison.
Semantics and context matter.

Width is a lovely word for things that have width, and meaningless if applied to things that don't.

Consider “Set your emphasis width to 12 points.”

None of that is applicable even though there are 3 CSS keywords in there and you can make sense of the sentence.

> Don't you want consistent appearance of the link both in colors and font-size, in the name of affordance?

Speaking for me, no. All words in the sentence, both inside and outside the anchor, should be consistent font, but the anchor has both state and behavior that can include color, underline, etc., to set what's inside the anchor to be inconsistent from the surrounding text, for attention and information.

Generally, font size is not one of those things that would vary (Mac dock icon mouseover as a counter-example).

There's a decent chance much of this makes more sense if you were making sites before these capabilities were developed and were along for the progression.

It likely does seem like a chaotic mess when picking it up for the first time in present state, so I think it's a fair reaction.
The microwave oven we had in the 80's when I was a kid had two knobs, and a single button.

Knob 1: A rotary timer. Twist it so the little arrow points at the time to cook (+/- 30 seconds)

Knob 2: Nobody knows. This was some sort of a "mode" selector that wasn't touched in eight years as far as I remember.

Button: More similar to a space bar on a mechanical keyboard - push to start cooking.

The door was just a simple "pull to open", there was no "eject" button to open the door.

When it was done cooking, there was a single "ding".
Imagine you invested in the index minus Nikola. This isn't improbable as several hours of due diligence would have raised concerns.

This shows that the choice of stocks included in an index is not arbitrary. You don't get "better on average" automatically just by buying the 500 stocks on a list someone sold to you.
Others are answering this with more specifics, but there's a first principles answer here too: not without facing a shareholder lawsuit for the difference. The whole idea behind owning stock in the company is that the company acts to maximize the value of that stock on your behalf.

So if the ownership of the company (Apple Computer, in this case) takes a deliberate act that fails to honor the shareholder compact (taking a huge haircut on a patent license), then you sue them because they should have gotten you more.
If you want to run decently heavy models, I'd recommend getting at a minimum getting 48GB. This allows you to run 34b llama models with ease, 70b models quantized, mixtral without problems.

If you want to run most models, get 64GB. This just gives you some more room to work with.

If you want to run anything, get 128GB or more. Unquantized 70b? Check. Goliath 120b? Check.

Note that high end consumer gpus end at 24GB VRAM. I have one 7900xtx for running llms, and the best it can reliably run is 4-bit quantized 34b models, anything larger is partially in regular ram.
The RBS syntax I like, I don't like how its a separate file though. I haven't used YARD but I think it would have similar issues to Sorbet. I much prefer things to be inline in programming languages in general. YARD looking at it, makes me think of Javadoc, which I always saw the issue with it being that it drifted from implementation over time as people don't update it. Sorbet does enforce it to be updated, and will throw an exception so your build will fail. Does YARD do that?
I have finished a PhD in AI just this past year, and can assure you there exist reviewers who spend hours per review to do it well. It's true that these days it's often the case that you can (and are more likely than not to) get unlucky with lazier reviewers, but that does not appear to have been the case with this paper.

For example just see this from the review of f5bf:

"The main contribution of the paper comprises two new NLM architectures that facilitate training on massive data sets. The first model, CBOW, is essentially a standard feed-forward NLM without the intermediate projection layer (but with weight sharing + averaging before applying the non-linearity in the hidden layer). The second model, skip-gram, comprises a collection of simple feed-forward nets that predict the presence of a preceding or succeeding word from the current word. The models are trained on a massive Google News corpus, and tested on a semantic and syntactic question-answering task. The results of these experiments look promising.

...

(2) The description of the models that are developed is very minimal, making it hard to determine how different they are from, e.g., the models presented in [15]. It would be very helpful if the authors included some graphical representations and/or more mathematical details of their models. Given that the authors still almost have one page left, and that they use a lot of space for the (frankly, somewhat superfluous) equations for the number of parameters of each model, this should not be a problem."

These reviews in turn led to significant (though apparently not significant enough) modifications to the paper (https://openreview.net/forum?id=idpCdOWtqXd60&noteId=C8Vn84f...). These were some quality reviews and the paper benefited from going this review process, IMHO.
Give it time. The leverage is inevitable.
This is 100% not how the stock market works. As soon as the volume increases, people will jump on the trade.

Also companies have an obligation to report once they have accumulated a certain percentage of a company.
Any resources you'd recommend for learning those principles/standards used in more "rigorous" fields? thanks :)
haha, mileage may vary based on which miles you're talking about! but my town's topography is distinctive enough that I'd recognize it. and if you paint satellite imagery onto it, even more so.
It's hard to look at pre-iPhone and post-iPhone smartphones and not see a pretty clear dividing line with significant shift in looks and functionality. I'm leery of design patents, but it's hard to say there wasn't some invention going on there.

We've had easy fingertip pulse oximetry since 1977, and Masimo was founded in 1989. It's unclear to me what in their patent is novel.
> He says he has friends of all ages, although he admits he shares more in common with people much older than him.

The only thing I'd worry about is him getting too obsessed to the point he has trouble relating with others that are from this generation or are younger than himself especially as the number of people familiar with that generation continue to pass away.
Aside from a virus, the sample set has hospitalization as a possible factor. Perhaps some have picked up an infection (bacteria), or another contributing virus? Also, what about pre-existing conditions? The already compromised having to be hospitalized might mean they left still compromised.

I'm not seeing how this analysis rules out these other possibilities. Lots of correlation here, but seemingly not much proven causation (i.e., it's all virus driven).
Maybe you're being sarcastic and it isn't clear but a bagel and tranq are different in one major way - one is addictive and causes necrosis.
Do rotary phones even work anymore? I had thought (perhaps mistakenly) that support for them was dropped a number of years ago.
Wasn't a hoax, opinion discarded into the trash where it belongs.
This is wrong way to deal with this kind of thing. Apple should have not been allowed to grow this big in the first place so they could pull these kind of tricks. Otherwise you'll be playing whack-a-mole.

Correct way would be to force Apple to split into separate independent entities. This should apply to all other businesses too big to fail.
Side note: I do agree that breeding dogs should be regulated due to animal neglect/abuse so much so that I’ve actually started the process of creating a not for profit to do a ballot initiative in my state to create a regulatory agency. I have worked with animal adoption agencies and no-kill shelters and my state has a horrible puppy mill problem. I am unfortunately very aware of the state of the breeder dogs that come from those.

I will put that stuff out of business or die trying.
Tesla please read this article.
That would only work if 51% of the shares had a sell order waiting.
Which honestly is the easiest option of them all if you own an Apple Silicon based Mac. You just download the ollama and then run `ollama run mixtral` (or choose a quantization from their models page if you don't have enough ram to run the defalt q4 model) and that's it.
I'm all for people living their life as they wish, if they don't harm others, even if there's literally nothing appealing about that for me.
It might be cheaper to license the patents, but if they managed to buy a controlling interest in the company, they would also then stand to profit from Masimo's licensing arrangements with other companies. That is, they would be purchasing a revenue-generating asset. And after this lawsuit, I'm sure Masimo will have more revenue, as other smaller companies realize there is no way to win against them, since even Apple lost.
Apple to halt sales of some Apple Watches in US
It’s called slippage - the order book doesn’t have 51% of all the shares immediately for sale at the right this second offer price.
Audi e-tron 50 or A6 digital cockpit disasters should go into design books: https://www.leasefetcher.co.uk/guides/car-technology/audi-vi... Screens on the left, on the right and in the middle. Good luck playing with that on autobahn speeds.
I didn't think anything of the flu until I got one that had me bedridden for weeks, brainfogged for another year after, and my motivational energy never fully returned. Now, I get the flu shot every year. I'm glad this is finally getting the attention it deserves.
Hard agree on this. In my career and life in general I see so many people and organizations delude themselves that they have to be the best of the best or find gimmicky ways to stand out or whatever.

Like, no. In 99% of contexts, you literally just have to do the basics well, and you will already be beating AT LEAST half of your competition, probably closer to 80% of your competition.
is this effective over TOR?
I think theyd have to buy the whole company, otherwise theyd be sued by the other shareholders.
Most "basic" autocomplete isn't all that dynamic and you can prepopulate on the server side reasonably well.

Sure, you still need JS to fetch a dynamic changing list, but you can also just update datalist options elements with JS rather than implement a full separate UX for autocomplete today. You are limited in the ability to CSS style datalist options so a lot of developers are still going to feel pressure in 2023 from "pixel perfect" UX designers to continue to reimplement that wheel, but the version of the JS that just updates a datalist after a fetch is likely much simpler than building a full "autocomplete control".
Invest in next gen nuclear -> cheap electricity -> improves the economics of electric power -> market forces drive electric transitions instead of policy dictates.
Their actions effect innocent others.
Helping people who invest in innovation get richer is exactly what helps innovation.
That's not what I mean. You can instruct the phone - over bluetooth, within the bluetooth functionality - to dial a number. No lock screen or dial app to access.
I've used similar tools like imageUSB and Rufus in the past. But it looks like Ventoy is better in every aspect. Excellent!
If he restores it, it probably will be.
I thought that too. Pulse dialing can’t possibly work anymore. Is OP sure it’s not a retrofit?
I don't think it's practical to lower or keep it at the same level.

- what do we say to poor people? Sorry your life sucks, but the economy is big enough now?

- even if we did say that, perish the thought, nobody's going to accept that. Africa, India, China, the rest of Asia, and South America have tons of poor people who want their turn. Why shouldn't they also get to be as rich as us? That implies a huge and growing demand for more and more energy and resources, regardless of what the US and Europe think of growth/degrowth/the environment.

Therefore I think it's much better to instead accelerate, and do it using clean technologies. By building clean tech in rich countries, we can make it better and cheaper until it's the default option for rapidly growing poor nations.

By demonstrating a commitment to growth, we also show them that our way is something to emulate, because growth is what they want and need. Degrowth is going to win you exactly zero friends in the poor world.

Nations like Russia and China can easily go to Africa and make the West look like self-centered rich fools who should be ignored. If that happens, there goes your environmental ambitions.
Not actually. The setting is essentially "allow OpenAI to look at your files (we promise they won't use them for anything, pinky swear)"

It's only the part in parenthesis that disturbs people. If I told you that you can now search your drop box via open AI's integration, you wouldn't really care.

Oh, the other caveat is that the default position of the switch that allows the integration is on in America and off in Europe, likely because, you know, American's dont seem to give a shit how nakedly anti-privacy their tech companys _can potentially be_.
Not sure if this is the primary reason, but it should be enough to throw off anti-spam systems that are looking for repeated posting of the same content within a short timespan
Executives aren't usually the ones with specific technical skills about the arrangement of sensors and so on. If you were looking to infringe like this, it would be better just to poach engineers.
What about aes-ctr?