skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's too milquetoast to even be half assed. You must be able to unsubscribe by whatever mediums you can subscribe by and do so without any bullshit dark patterns trying to trick you into not unsubscribing.
"298MB of RAM" if you were wondering about some constraint.
Fair to say this happened 11,000 years ago?
https://archive.is/A3aiT
chemo is well known for the treatment being worse than the disease...in the short term. when it works, the long term effect is well worth it.
>It's the security and privacy issues that arise when we start sending this data in a recorded and logged form over the Internet.

That's for consumers and distributors to figure out. The lack of trust between consumers and distributors is no reason to continue allowing online porn to be exempt from long established and agreed upon controls.
SQLite extension that stores tables in an S3-compatible object store
Just to point out it does, kind of: https://github.com/intel/intel-extension-for-pytorch

I've asked before if they'll merge it back into PyTorch main and include it in the CI, not sure if they've done that yet.

In this case I think the biggest bottleneck is just that they don't have a fast enough card that can compete with having a 3090 or an A100. And Gaudi is stuck on a different software platform which doesn't seem as flexible as an A100.
when we first moved here we had 15/5 that was actually 6/1 if we were lucky, so Starlink seemed like a good idea, so I got in my reservation early. We finally were able to switch to Starlink and while things were better, it became obvious that they were possibly oversubscribe in our area. Then they put caps in. Then they raised prices.

Then my rural power company saved the day by stringing fibre to EVERY single drop in their system. 1000 symmetric but really more like 950/800 but I'm doing fine, thanks.

I really think fiber is it for rural internet. They have the will to do it and it's rolling out all over in some states.
Recently discussed https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38641397 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38644731
> Nice eye — I did do remove that clause, but because the understanding in the industry is that the data shared with Guild members (for which there are 12k WGA writers and 100k+ SAG actors) can still be shared by those members. And even if they can’t, someone would likely leak them: good luck finding who broke an NDA with that many members!

No, the Guild would assemble an audit committee of likely three people or a third party auditor would be appointed. It absolutely wouldn't be shared with the entire membership. It would be extremely easy to find the source of a leak, and they'd be subject to ruinous penalties.

This is existing practice in a few areas.
> Already in 2016, there were Democrats who claimed that the election wasn't fair (and therefore wasn't valid).

Those Dems were very few and far between. Hillary Clinton conceded the morning after the polls closed, and pretty much all Dems at least paid lip service to wishing Trump well in his new office.
This is my line of thinking. It's bonkers if that's the case - sign of a completely broken mindset towards auth.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_of_Altamira#Cultural_impa... and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_5MtGCWImE
Any documentations to support this?
A) I agree with many of the comments here arguing that this is not necessarily a new technique, and

B) you’re gonna go far in this life, I’d bet! I know nothing about you but this whole README just reeks of a bright young thinker who’s not afraid to question existing paradigms and can follow through on their conceptual vision. Plus it helps that you’re a very dramatic and effective writer. I encourage you not to let any of this feedback get you down!

Will sit down with the repo myself later, just for me it’s not an angle of HCI I’ve examined explicitly, at least for very long.
>Also keep in mind that from the perspective of someone falling in, there's nothing particularly noticeable as you cross the event horizon.

So I've heard that before, but let's say you are slowly spiraling into a supermassive black hole with very low tidal forces near the event horizon. You get close to the event horizon. Light can't escape. You stick your hand into / past the event horizon. Seems like a pretty definite discontinuity in "noticeability", if one second you can see your hand and move it around, and the next you can't see it and can't yank it back.
That exists, actually; you're looking for systems like https://libre.computer/products/ that support UEFI by default, so you can just grab a generic OS image and have it work because device enumeration works the same as on PC and not the... "interesting" hard-coded stuff that's weirdly common in ARM. The official marketing is ... I think this is it? The Arm SystemReady program - https://www.arm.com/architecture/system-architectures/system... but I find it easier to just say UEFI.
Looks good but lacks layer 3 and fiber aggregation switches which we use in our SMB.
Substances affect different people differently. I can have 3-4 drinks in an evening without changing my eating or sleep habits at all and without feeling any different the next day.

Some people experience drinking-related issues other than alcoholism and I just don't want to conflate those issues with alcoholism. I know some actual alcoholics. It's different.
also: our telco is simultaneously running trunks underground, and we will probably hop on to that (since it's buried) for backup.
Yep, I start off by entering nothing, then just spaces, then special characters and then finally get to entering some typical data
There are several: iCloud, ProtonDrive, Sync.com, etc.
> As the product evolves, Curio’s founders want to give parents even more control over Grok’s conversations. “If this is going to be a guest in the house, we want parents to have influence over what the toy believes,” Eaton said. “Maybe your family is vegetarian or religious and you want to influence [conversation around those topics]. Or maybe your kid has certain interests, like dinosaurs, and you want to put them in there.”

Of course the parents should add control to their child's play experience.

I can't wait for when the children learn who's been listening to their thoughts. This'll be creepy AF.
I guess its better than a sports stadium...
If the sun went pop, the Earth wouldn't notice for more than eight minutes, and Neptune not for 4 hours.
> People argue for ROCm to support older cards because that is all they have accessible to them.

What they really need is to support the less expensive cards, of which the older cards are a large subset. There are a lot of people who will make contributions and fix bugs if they can actually use the thing. Some CS student at the university has to pay tuition and therefore only has an old RX570, and that isn't going to change in the next couple years, but that kind of student could fix some of the software bugs currently preventing the company from selling more expensive GPUs to large institutions. If the stack supported their hardware.
My most simple and strangely useful app: https://pythonlist.netlify.app/

It just takes a list and makes it a python list (with quotes and commas)
Let me make sure I understand your position.

Are you saying that if this bill becomes law, consumption of porn among minors will not decrease?
> Is there evidence of this happening yet?

Right now, today, when choosing a library, top of my mind is "has this been around long enough to be in GPT4's training set?"

Because to give up the 5-10x productivity boost GPT allows for, a library better be really good.
Of course Tesla has killed the most people they have literally millions of cars with this functionality on the road, comparing that is kind of silly. That said I have not actually hear of any major or fatal accidents on FSD. They have also saved a lot of people by adding advanced detection that most cars on the road simply don't have. So a comparison like that really just doesn't make much sense.

Comparing Tesla Autopilot to other quasi-Autopilots makes more sense.

The real difference is that Tesla sells cars, makes money and can use this as a feature in their cars. For basic autopilot of course, but also for other things. So its worth doing for them even if they don't reach Level 5. They have not stacked their financial viability on that. Arguably they have stacked part of their credibility on that, but they have lost most of that.

Waymo and Cruise basically don't have a relevant product and wont have one for quite a while.
I had no idea this existed, thanks for the tip!

https://kagifeedback.org/t/release-notes
There's a third option here, too: don't use the tools.
Google Maps automatically caches areas around your common saved locations (e.g. Home and Work). Outside that, what's the value? It's a bit niche to open your map for a cached rough outline of the planet.

I do wish the apps were a bit less stingy about letting you choose to fully offline large areas more easily though. The detailed road information is helpful when you don't have signal and if you travel for work it's often outside what a single box will capture. E.g. Google Maps lets you offline as much as you want (as far as I can practically tell) but you have to do it in many about-indiana-sized-rectangles instead of just saying "save these states" or being able to zoom out farther to a region directly.
If Cadillac Fleetwoods had the same net $$$ per unit as Escalades, GM would be building them today.

That said, it would've been possible to update those vehicles, like any other.

When you're an institutional (gov't) buyer in the US, you are often obliged by your funding source to choose a domestic supplier of equipment. GM and Ford had the market split between them, so they knew their LEO customers would have to buy whatever they had to sell. Hence, police Explorers. Police Tahoes. Police F-150s.
Don't Use Thorium Browser – If Installed, Remove It
It looks like a dialect of chicken scratch.

https://www.whinycat.com/cdn/shop/products/chicken_scratch.j...
Hahah I'm in formal methods, not graphics, so I'm picturing a literal green glowing fog. But what I'm gathering is polygons partitioned into cube chunks. This is of course not including the particulars of this impressive contribution, but I fear that's beyond my ken.
No it’s not a hybrid effort (except insomuch as LLMs are reliant on human generated data for training). They’re simply saying that the code created by the LLM can be examined and potentially understood by humans.
"Developers should test their own code" is emblematic of a juvenile mindset in people who regularly fire up their "reality distortion field" to avoid the effort of educating themselves on their own operations (and that helps them deny responsibility when things go South). As W. Edwards Deming, bane of all "gut instinct" executives, once wrote, "The consumer is the most important part of the production line. Quality should be aimed at the needs of the consumer, present and future." The lack of a dedicated quality team shows a lack of respect for your customers. You know, the people you need to buy your products or services (unless you're intent on living off VC loans until you have to pull the ripcord on your golden parachute).
I don't get it.

Why not just cancel now? You're paying for the whole year either way.

I don't understand why you have to set a calendar reminder.

Sorry if I'm missing a detail here.
There must be separate quality lines because the stuff they put in the Halloween variety bags always tastes bad but getting a standard KitKat is better. I've definitely noticed the variety packs also pick up each others flavors.
Thanks!

1000 of lines to test a single route? What logic is on the page? I just find it hard to wrap my mind around.

No matter how fancy a web page presents itself, isn't it always in essence a form that triggers a thing, like a post to a db?
Call your nearest Conservative party MP and complain. They're the ones pushing this.
>The one question I want to ask these government officials is "Where are the parents?"

To be clear, this bill originated outside the government. The Canadian Conservative Party do not currently form the government. They are ideologically-driven religious fundamentalists who don't care "where the parents are". For them it's "porn == bad" and "government oversight == bad except if it's on an issue that my ideology happens to align with".
This is an actual issue in consumer banking. If a bank forges a paper document, it's possible to hold up the original countercopy (assuming you filed it) and say "No, your document is fake, and you are attempting fraud."

These agreements often have millions of copies, so it's easy to find the applicable version of the T&Cs.

If all you have are digital T&Cs at the end of a web link, and those T&Cs can be updated at any time, and you are only ever sent the link, and not the updated T&Cs - you have nothing.

You could argue that everyone should download every T&C update. In theory that's true. But in practice a problem that could be solved relatively simply - keep a single letter - now requires many more steps, backup strategies, and so on.

You could also argue that banks should keep copies of their T&C versions and supply them on request. Which they do - except that in practice a bank that's trying to forge a document won't have a problem forging T&Cs.

This not hypothetical. I've known people win court cases because they kept a single piece of paper.
> I don't regard time spent in University to learn how logical gates work and many other useful things, as a loss of time.

It’s unquestionably a loss of time, the only question is whether it’s an optimal use of time. This depends on your goals. For most software engineers looking to use ML, starting with existing frameworks and knowledge and drilling down as necessary is the most prudent method.

We all have to make sacrifices in what we learn. Even for yourself, the topics you chose to learn about implicitly left out other parallel topics you didn’t learn about. And you also didn’t learn everything from the least abstracted, most fundamental level. We need to choose the appropriate level of abstraction for the problem at hand, which will depend on each person’s goals.
Why Do People Send Unsolicited Sexual Images? [pdf]
You're thinking of Lascaux I believe.
Well - sure, but we can't change the history, and GCM is the mode that got picked by NIST, is most widely implemented, and is used in lots of places. It has been widely analyzed and scrutinized, and is unlikely to turn out to be insecure at this point.

I personally actually also agree that having a single mode would've been more elegant, but sometimes, in a collaborative open standard, compromises are necessary for practical or political reasons. Some people care about FIPS compliance, others care about performance, and so on. If you have a benevolent dictator, you can just tell (some of) those people to go away, but that's not really how an IETF working group works - the goal there is (rough) consensus.

And, personally I don't think any of these compromises are so unreasonable as to call for fearmongering and references to the NSA. Again, GCM is used securely in lots of places, there's no reason it can't be used securely in OpenPGP too.
Great message (“you forgot a license!”), not a very necessary tone IMO! Not to be the hall monitor…
Choicemaking and the Interface (2014)
This works both ways, though. If something goes wrong with an AWS managed service, they are the responsible party. You have someone to sue.
>It's impossible to prove a negative. Maybe they believe that this was user error/malice but are doing more research to confirm this and find evidence of a vulnerability.

So it's impossible for me to prove that nobody has walked through my front door today? I'm quite confident it isn't. I'm also confident if they have sane logging in place, they can prove accounts weren't being accessed by unauthorized users.

You're also talking in vagaries like they're hunting a ghost. They've been interacting with a willing end-user who originally reported the error.
No, just jump ship and let the damn company fail. Fail faster, haha! This is how we have nice things; when bad companies are not propped up.
This is definitely a tricky venue to get into, but the prestige still makes submissions worth it.
I’ve always thought the obvious play here in a capitalist driven society is to require police officers to have private insurance. Insurance companies would quickly land on:

1. No camera, no insurance

2. A national registry for individual officer history

Having exclusive use of legal force needs some kind of counter balance. Not sure what else could do it.
Is there some reason why you wouldn't be able to run a purely open source software stack on it, if you wanted? Does Microsoft Windows even run on RISC-V?
False dichotomy. Poor dev practice is not fixed by elimination of QA, but rather fixed by improving dev practice. The “five why’s” can help.
People are wholly naive if they think the main reason mainstream America watches the news in the US is for the news. Anchors and casters are like local celebrities. Going to be a *long* time before AI has that kind of following
I don’t care about their sandbox or distributed system. They are irrelevant to the method. The missing language model for program generation is disappointing but I imagine anyone interested in replication, myself included, would prefer to roll their own.
I was thinking about how Magic the Gathering has so many infinite combos. In a deck with a wide variety of cards, you're likely to be able to accidentally construct an infinite combo.

For those who don't play, the most iconic infinite combo involves two cards, the first says "Whenever you gain life, an opponent loses that much life.", the second card says "Whenever an opponent loses life, you gain that much life."

These cards, when combined, do nothing... until you gain a life or an opponent takes damage. Then their effects combined means a chain reaction that repeats until your opponents are dead and you have gained as much life as they had.

There's a variety of infinite combos in MTG. Some of them involve a creature that says "Tap to add mana to your mana pool" combined with another card that says "Pay mana to untap a creature", allowing you to tap and untap an infinite number of times.

Some infinite combos involve returning a card to your hand, and recasting it which gives you the resources you need to return it to your hand and recast again. Some infinite combos involve looping a card from your discard pile repeatedly.

There are no one-card infinite combos (that would likely not make it past the testers), but there are plenty of two-card infinite combos, and an combinatorically increasing number of three and four card infinite combos.

I think there is some similarity computationally speaking between turing completeness, and the ability to construct an infinite combo in a game like MTG. An infinite allows you (the player) to continue taking the same action over and over again, accumulating some game resource in the process. This bears resemblance to the infinite tape Turing envisioned, a way to hold data. Player actions are much analogous to the instruction set. Infinites that are optional for the player (not all infinites in MTG are optional once the pieces are on the board) can also stand in for conditional statements - a key requirement of turing completeness.

I'd be interested in seeing the bare minimum number of cards required to generate turing completeness. If anybody else knows more about this domain, I would love to hear their opinions.
You're taking something that doesn't belong to you and copying it. It's stealing. In order to even make the "unauthorized copy" you mention, you have to take the thing first. That's the stealing.
For the great joy of a good time spent with friends, of course, which is one of life's most important sources of happiness. A little bit of risk to one's health is worth such a reward.

Most pleasures carry some risk.
> that really seems like a last resort

Have we had a compelling reason to research drugs whose primary purpose is to kill bone marrow in healthy patients before?
I don't think that there is a big mystery. He might have lost his memory due to stress, fatigue, lack of sleep, use of drugs (such as diazepam) etc.

Maybe he was supposed to change flights in Copenhagen to somewhere else, to Russia or Israel but in his confused state he lost his passport at the airport after the security check. Then tried to board his airplane and somehow managed to board another airplane. The airport workers and flight attendants are supposed to guard for such cases but sometimes they also make mistakes and don't notice someone walking into restricted area etc. It happens, very rarely but happens even in the best guarded airports.
A great read on that topic is Gwern's Surprisingly Turing Complete: https://gwern.net/turing-complete
It's literally the most foundational part of self driving.
You are making the assumption it is for long term habitation, which might not be the case.

For long term habitation, you would solve it like any other engineering problem. How many people do you need to support, against what threats, for how long and what safety margins do you need.

Air is a solved problem, you either pull/push from the outside environment and filter on its way in (open circuit), or you treat the air (closed circuit). Waste goes into a leech field or is incinerated. Electrical is generated / stored onsite or powered externally.
That sounds like the perfect high end MCU core. Doesn’t say what the target use case is, but if it’s like other RISC-V announcements, they’re probably talking about general purpose CPUs, in which case those specs are pretty disappointing. It’s a shame that RISC-V has made so little impact in embedded electronics.
Could be a nice wall paper generator every 29 min. Input a big list of random prompts and let it rotate
No, that's what we call "post hoc ergo propter hoc".

Styles change, and my Grandparents loved their Fleetwoods and Town Cars and Chrysler Newports. My Dad wouldn't be caught dead in one. So, the market (outside institutional buyers) disappeared far faster than CAFE standards rose. The Chrysler LX-cars are the closest thing to those big old cars, and despite being a (very heavy) unibody, Chrysler sold millions of them profitably for the past 19 years.
It's not password protected. It also contains a source.7z that is not password protected.
It looks like of the features both systems have, Subaru EyeSight performs better... But Tesla FSD has vastly more abilities (some of which it performs well at, some middling, and some poor).
That's the way we do SaaS over here in Australia. Kicks tyres. She'll be right mate.
This looks promising, will be excited to see more regions coming in, especially US-east!
Historically, yes. Apple used to be a lot stricter about these things. But they have loosened up over the years.

Back in the day, they were removing stuff like scripting apps. They sent warnings to the devs of Pythonista, forcing them to do things like [remove file-opening support](https://mygeekdaddy.net/2014/06/17/working-around-apple/). And they infamously removed iDOS (a DOSBOX port).

Now they're much more loose and allow things like iSH and so on. It is still a little bit of a gray area for arbitrary decisions by Apple, though.
> They’re returning to their own land.

As a matter of academic interest, when would you say the statute of limitations runs out on the right of displaced peoples to reclaim their ancestral lands? If your answer is "it never runs out," then the descendants of the ancient Canaanites, Midianites, and Amalekites† would like a word ....

† According to the Hebrew Bible, the ancient Israelites violently (and genocidally?) displaced these peoples; see, e.g., Num. 31, Josh. 10:40, 11:15. But it's not clearly established that this actually happened.