skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From that page: "For additional privacy and security, 14 data categories — including Health and passwords in iCloud Keychain — are end-to-end encrypted. Apple doesn't have the encryption keys for these categories, and we can't help you recover this data if you lose access to your account." The page goes on to list iMessage as always E2E. Other types of data like Calendar are only encrypted in transit and at rest so they can do server side processing.

You may also find their legal explanation a bit clearer: https://www.apple.com/legal/privacy/data/en/messages/

Specifically: "We designed iMessage to use end-to-end encryption, so there’s no way for Apple to decrypt the content of your conversations when they are in transit between devices. Attachments you send over iMessage (such as photos or videos) are encrypted so that no one but the sender and receiver(s) can access them."
Under the current system, it's already effectively "nothing" for

>People who can't afford existing drugs

>People who can't get corporations to develop drugs for their conditions because they wouldn't be "profitable"

>People who can't make their farm's business model work even though they're fully capable of growing the crops people want and getting them to market

and so on. But thank you for being my daily encounter with Better Things Aren't Possible Guy.
"The Girl Who Fell Beneath The Sea" by Axie Oh. My absolute favorite this year! So well written and such a beautiful story! The way the story comes to life through her storytelling is unreal!

"The Night Circus" by Erin Morgenstern. Beautiful, magical story about a circus that opens only at night.

"The Leviathan" by Rosie Andrews. Dark and mysterious story set in 1643 England. I was so blown away that this was her debut novel! Just wow!

"I'm Glad My Mom Died" by Jennette McCurdy. This was my favorite non-fiction book by far! I devoured this in less than a week! Amazingly insightful and well written!
There is no escape tomorrow, but for today they live like (and in many cases literally are) kings.
Counter-Strike 2 HTML injection bug exposes players' IP addresses
How? Why? It seems like a reasonable question to me, so maybe I'm prejudiced too. That's entirely possible. What's the prejudice? How do I stop? Why is this a bad question? Does it have an answer?
I don’t think this deserves t be downvoted. It’s just a misunderstanding. What you’re thinking of is a different concept in the US legal system called res judicata or issue preclusion.
I'm seeing a price of $69.99 for the ebook. Maybe you're accessing that site through your University and they have a subscription or something?
They tracked the balls for two months, if it was easy to see that they always move X direction during a sunny day they would know. That is likely the first thing they checked, we know that plants can turn to face the sun.
Also discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38605525
District courts don’t set precedent; appellate and supreme courts do.
The Hamas military is embedded in the civilian population, as everyone knows. IDF has sustained minimal losses after getting their act together after Oct 7th, but if your definition of war precludes one sided casualties, then I guess operation Desert Storm wasn’t part of a war. If you need a very explicit front line, then I guess the Vietnam and Iraq wars weren’t wars either.

These answers are obvious. You would’ve been able to answer your questions yourself if you were earnestly looking to do so.
They are never going to do this.
> a + b√3

I assume there are no values a and b (including irrationals) which would make that sum an integer?
Rescuing Universities from Themselves: A five-point plan (by Steven Pinker)
Oh, I didn't know that; how cool! Have you asked itchyny about their interest in upstreaming the changes <https://github.com/itchyny/gojq/compare/main...wader:gojq:fq>? they don't look completely out of alignment with gojq and it would make reasoning about "gojq version what?" in fq easier and the inverse merge of theirs versus your fork seems to have a substantial changelog entry https://github.com/wader/gojq/compare/fq...itchyny:gojq:main
> Your links have nothing to do with what I'm asking. Also you predicted that websites that host porn would somehow go out of business which never happened.

Just wait. Generating > hosting.

> Where are you getting this idea that anyone can't buy stuff on amazon and edit on their computer?

It's fucking difficult.

> Why aren't you answering the questions of why there isn't a glut of high quality scripts, sitcoms, tv shows and independent movies?

Because the US market can only bear a few thousand theatrical and television productions a year. There are more than a thousand directors that would love a shot to be greenlit, but the capital, personnel, and logistics inputs are too high. Compare to the number of software engineers, fan fiction authors, web comic authors, etc.

> At some point you will have to accept that these things are difficult and it isn't just about how easy it is to make images.

Momentary technological limitation. At some point in the future, our daydreams will become a live canvas we share with others in real time. We're getting there.

That might be a long way off, but some of the next steps along the way include easy to use generative film tech.

> The best people are still the best.

You'll never know who could have been the best. The best director might have been bound by opportunity cost to earn money for their family working two jobs.
This is a bit of a tangent, but I want to discuss how deviously literal the Supreme Court decided to be in order to avoid letting anyone establish any precedent about what was or wasn't a legal abortion.

The original filing said "It is also Dr. Karsan’s good faith belief and medical recommendation that that the Emergent Medical Condition Exception to Texas’s abortion bans and laws permits an abortion in Ms. Cox’s circumstances, as Ms. Cox has a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by, caused by, or arising from her current pregnancy that places her at risk of death or poses a serious risk of substantial impairment of her reproductive functions if a D&E abortion is not performed. Dr. Karsan is unsure how close to death her patients need to be before abortion is permitted under Texas law. As has been the case with prior patients over the last two years, Dr. Karsan is unsure if Ms. Cox’s current medical condition counts as close enough to death under Texas law for the Emergent Medical Condition Exception to apply." (clauses 139,140)

The Texas Supreme Court said "The pleadings state that Ms. Cox's doctor believes Ms. Cox qualifies for an abortion based on the medical-necessity exception. But when she sued seeking a court's pre-authorization, Dr. Karsan did not assert that Ms. Cox has a 'life-threatening physical condition' or that, in Dr. Karsan's reasonable medical judgement, an abortion is necessary because Ms. Cox has the type of condition the exception requires."

In short, the court decided that Dr. Karsan described the statute, and that Dr. Karsan stated that the statute applied, but Dr. Karsan did not actually say "the patient had a life-threatening physical condition," but only that the patient WOULD have a life-threatening condition if an abortion were not performed. Or at least that's probably the argument; it's not explained very well. Therefore, the Court cannot not rule on whether the abortion is legal or not. After all, only a doctor could make that determination, not a court (you can read the smirk).

Truly an amazing decision, and if there's an award in Hell for achievements in pedantry, that court would have a real shot. Sadly, the Court would probably be disqualified for such an award as they technically lied (Dr. Karsan did in fact say "Ms. Cox has a life-threatening physical condition"), and one presumes Hell's Pedantry Awards interpret such rules quite strictly.
2x4s are one of the only things I can think of whose entire name is just literally raw dimensions, so finding out they are not even right was a real wtf moment.
Apple made deals to set the default search engine and the default maps app, and rejected other app stores. As bad as Google is, Apple is even worse, setting worse terms for deals and rejecting other deals outright to favor their own products.
> So they dont look at precedents in court system in USA ?

I literally described how that impacts things: "The appellate process and the system of binding precedent goes with it serves to somewhat make things more consistent overall than individual trial court processes would when considered over a longer time and a larger number of cases".
>Without drug patents drug discovery would completely stop.

I don't believe that, but I won't convince you. Instead, I invite you to try to convince yourself. Imagine a world where drug discovery happens without patents. Talk it out, falsify your propositions as you go, see if you can come up with something workable.
Alphabet Loses Antitrust Fight with Epic Games over Google Play
Oh crap. The LDX (labs0),Y instruction doesn't actually exist! If you are cool with undocumented opcodes you can replace that with LAX (labs0),Y which does exist. Otherwise it would need another 2 cycles for TAX.

Yes I wrote, based on mult65.a credited to Nick Jameson. That is one of the better ones; I took a look and thought about how it could be sped up a little.
> assuming your programs don't execute other programs.

What about language runtimes? They don't execute other programs in the sense of ELF executables (although the programs they interpret might), but they have to support every syscall that's included in the language. So, for example, the Python interpreter would have to include the appropriate code for every syscall that Python byte code could call (in addition to whatever internal syscalls are used by the interpreter itself). That would be a pretty complete set of syscalls.
> They do. It's either Apple store or you go out of business, if you are developing a mobile app.

They don't. Apple is selling both the services and the hardware. They're not asking anyone to develop apps for them and no one is entitled to build an app store for their hardware.

But if I'm an Android phone manufacturer and Epic wanted to build an app stores for my devices, but I refused for no other reason than Google's money or pressure, there's a case for anti-competition. If Apple licensed iOS to other manufacturers, the same case would apply.
Desktop 2013 i5 - Core i5-3340 (choosing this to put your arguement at an advantage
Mobile 2013 i5 - Core i5-13600T (choosing this as its mobile, with the same approximate price point).

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/5175vs2071/Intel-i5-136...

While not the most informative of benchmarks, you'll find that 10 year old i5's really are quite a bit slower, especially when attempting to power more modern hardware (SSD, more powerful GPU) due to the both the slower ram, thinner busses and crappier cache.

Intels branding is -so good- that people have blurred all their i5 experiences together.

> The point is more about how slow Intel processors still are really.

The i3/i5 is not their flagship CPU, Its middle market tech, The 'middle market' gets something which is 'just enough to keep them happy'. Most of these systems run a browser and office, so as long as that works, people are happy.

When you want performance from intel you buy their higher end i9's and Xeons,
Every mitigation is code and complexity. There is always a cost.
I wonder if these will be cheap enough for nvme coolers?
It's more a portfolio of companies that many make less, but a few hits cover the investment in the rest (the standard publishing and tech investing story). If the hits are going to take a 18% rev loss compared to say Epic's 12% store, then that's 18% less funding for the rest if things are invested efficiently/predicted well for the portfolio.
No one disputes that Apple and Google are monopolies. Monopolies are not uncommon or illegal. It's what you do with them that counts and this is a story about what Google specifically did with their monopoly and how that was illegal and a jury has said so.
> Yes, adding addEventListener code all over your app would be repetitive and wasteful, but that (amongst browser incompatibilities) is why jQuery was invented, but you can hand roll your own utility or use HTMX or a million concise tools to do this. Including a right-sized dependency isn’t going to kill you.

This article is explicitly a defense of the interface that htmx (which I am a core maintainer for) employs. I think more JS libraries should use attributes as their interface. As for when and where that's appropriate, well, like anything, it depends on the context, but I'm confident in saying it's appropriate in more contexts than it is currently being used.
Talking about app store specifically, the difference according to many on HN would seem to be that Apple can have a monopoly because they use it to protect you, but Google should not because they use it to exploit you. This sounds pretty silly to me but it seems to be pretty popular.
> The dictator who listens really seems to be what the majority prefer because they don't actually want to be accountable for those decisions they just want a seat at the table.

Yes. I would go so far as to say people want to experience the feeling of making decisions, of responsibility, without actually having any.
The lesson is clear, don't buy off competitors to preserve your dominant position as that's illegal.
Then why not drink coffee?
> There is a right to be allowed to compete.

You can always build your own phone and setup your own app store. Samsung does.
I'm not the one who moved the goal posts here though was I ?

Here, let me quote myself.

> The software is being used by more people, which means it will expose more bugs.
Why not? As they all intend to ship their version of 2nm in ~2025.
F-Droid is strictly more secure than the Apple App Store. The same MITM attack works on Apple, but since the App Store doesn't have reproducible builds, you have no way to detect it. The App Store is the least secure of the mobile app stores that most HNers use. You've been sold a bill of goods.

Aurora isn't an app store. It is an unauthorized client for the Play Store.
The doors sort of backfired.

A few (non-US) pilot/copilots have used the door to hijack their own plane and intentionally crash airliners while the other pilot was in the restroom.

I think they now require at least two people to stay in the cockpit at all times to work around the problem the door created.

Not sure if that means an additional crew member, or if they are allowed to have a flight attendant hang out in the cabin while someone takes a whiz.
Apple is just as sleezy as Google but doesn't have as much power and reach. If I don't want to, I don't have to interact with Apple at all. Google is much harder to avoid, impossible in some domains like email.
Yes, thank drug legalization .
Great for free trials.
Yeah, I'm aware, but for the entities who have the revenue that justifies taking Apple or Google to court, it's 30%. Which is fairly egregious for a glorified package manager.
These aren't general n-gons on vertices in that set - the Einstein tiles have additional constraints:

The angles of the Einstein tile are all ±90 or ±120° - so the edges are all parallel to one of the 12 30° meridians. And the edge lengths are all integer multiples of a common unit. And as you place these tiles edge-to-edge, and match vertices, the same applies to the edges that make up each subsequent tile.

So each line takes integer steps along lines that are either parallel to the axes or are at a 30° angle from an axis. If we take 2 as the shortest length of an edge (so all the edges of the shape are either 2 or 4 units long), then:

- if we move from a point 2 units along an edge parallel to an axis, we add or subtract 2 from one of our cartesian coordinates.

- if we move 2 units along an edge at 30° from an axis, we must add or subtract 1 from one of our coordinates, and √3 from the other (it's the hypotenuse of a 30°/60° right triangle)

Those are the only moves you can make, so in an infinite tiling of Einstein tiles, the vertices will all fall on those points.
How does the topic of toxoplasmosis gondii reappear every six months or so?

Reminds me of the Paul Graham article about submarine news placement.

http://paulgraham.com/submarine.html

I wish i knew how to compose one of those related article searches that dang does so well.

Imperfect search:

https://hn.algolia.com/?q=toxoplasmosis
If they had restricted those APIs way back when, Android would have stalled and Tizen or some other platform would have eaten a huge chunk of the market they have today. You can't just change some important historical detail and pretend there would be zero consequences except the ones you care about.
Ah yes, plus your link [1] already had significant attention here (thanks!):

Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38522428 - Dec 2023 (34 comments)

> does anyone feel as though there's any benefit to linking to reddit

You were certainly right in this case, but I'm not ready to ban reddit.com because I think there are still some positive threads that come in through that window. If anyone disagrees strongly enough to peruse https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... and make the case against, the court will grant standing :)
> Similarly it can be illegal to be high on something exotic and out in public. As hot takes go that seems fairly cool.

Nope, try suggesting that in much of the mainstream/popular internet and you'll be immediately pounced on for discriminating against the homeless (and then the people who said that will get pounced on for saying homeless rather than "unhoused"). "So you think it should be legal for rich people to get high but not poor people". Pretty soon someone will bring race into it too.
> you could have "functional addicts" that cause little or no societal harm

Yeah, I don't know about that – plenty of "functional alcoholics" around, sure, but also plenty of not-so-functional alcoholics around, as well as the wife-and-kid-beater alcoholics.

Heroin is not alcohol and doesn't induce aggression in the same way, but it's also a lot more addictive, and especially at low wages getting your daily dose can be a challenge – so "junkies" will not be eliminated outright. I consider it an open question whether they will be reduced – it's very possible (perhaps even plausible), but I certainly wouldn't consider it a forgone conclusion.

> My friend's relative was a functional addict on and off for 20 years.

Dick van Dyke was a chain-smoker until well in to his 70s and he's currently doing well at the age of 97.

These are the sort of things where you really need to look at overall effects and statistics, rather than individual cases.
Another thread posted an example where for over a hundred years a Swedish skeleton was thought to be male because it was buried with weapons, but then just a decade ago it was found by DNA evidence to be female.

Surely bone anatomy is much more reliable to interpret than a half million year old pile of sticks yet it was still gotten wrong. Anything that needs interpreted will invite incorrect interpretations and should be taken with a grain of salt.
It's not about whether most people care, it's about competitors taking Google at their word and putting in the effort to make a competing store, only to get materially harmed when Google makes these backroom deals.

Nobody's making a third party app store on iOS because apple says "we allow it" so nobody's harmed when apple requires exclusivity to exist on their App Store.
This is billed as a convenience for travelers, but remember that over 66% of the US population lives inside a “border crossing”.

If they can add checkpoints without adding staff, you can bet these things will start popping up like weeds.
From what I understand, cars in Japan are all capped at 180 km/h, and cars that are capable of more often have a gps check to unlock automatically when on a known race track.

180 is still quite high but at least not completely insane as some of the gangs were before that limit. A number would probably need to be found for any country, state, etc but the tech is probably ready.
You can tell a lot about how someone thinks by listening for denial of agency. The CEO had to do it; that drug addict had no choice; he had to defend his honor; she couldn’t lie.

Sometimes people have only one choice, but they almost always have agency.
If you’ve ever done construction work (particularly framing obviously) you tend to realize it very quickly, but you get quite used to dealing with it; it’s all quite standardized, simple carpentry.

A lot of batteries like 18650’s or CR2032’s as examples are basically just their size in millimeters, and as far as I know, they are accurate.
You're missing:

Apple: iOS only on iPhone. No way to get one without the other.

Google: Android is open source and everyone can build their own hardware. Play Store is optional for manufacturers.
Intel 4nm ( Meteor Lake ) is coming out soon ( in a few days time ), Intel 3nm expected next year. And Intel 2nm in (late) 2025. So in a similar time frame as TSMC.
Thanks for sharing this article, I really liked it!
Just wait until you find out about the quarter pounder. :)
Seems to be roughly even, with somewhat more TSA PreCheck-only members than Global Entry members (including NEXUS and SENTRI).

As of March 2023, TSA said [1]: "TSA PreCheck® application program has surpassed 15 million active members" and "Thirty-two million travelers now benefit from TSA PreCheck expedited screening after being vetted though TSA PreCheck ®, U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Global Entry or another federal vetting program."

As of September 2023, CBP announced stated that there were over 12 million Global Entry members in a press release. [2]

This appears to include SENTRI and NEXUS members, since as of July 2022 it was stated: [3] "There are over 7.6 million participants enrolled directly in Global Entry, and over 1.8 million members of NEXUS and SENTRI that also receive Global Entry benefits."

[1] https://www.tsa.gov/news/press/releases/2023/03/02/tsa-prech...

[2] https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-anno...

[3] https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/202...
Well, call me an orange cat because I have no idea what this is about!
I would recommend finding a friend or looking up a YT video or whatever to see what the experience is like. Theres a reason this keeps hitting the front page, and it isn’t because the current experience is good.
> Things will even out in the US over time, I think.

Note, US Supreme Court recently overturned 50 years of precedent of Roe vs. Wade.
WASM and OpenShift Combine for Efficient, Scalable Applications
Microservices with WASM: Microservices architectures are becoming the norm, and OpenShift is a leading platform for deploying them. WASM can be used to build lightweight, high-performance microservices that can be containerized and managed by OpenShift.

Edge Computing (MicroShift): As edge computing grows, there's a need for lightweight, efficient, and fast executables. WASM modules can be deployed at the edge, and OpenShift can manage these edge deployments, ensuring scalability and reliability.

Serverless Functions (OpenShift Knative): Serverless architectures allow developers to focus on code, leaving the infrastructure management to platforms. WASM can be used to write serverless functions, and OpenShift can orchestrate these functions, ensuring they're run efficiently and can scale as needed.

Portable Plugins: WASM can be used to write plugins for platforms that support them, ensuring they're portable across different systems. OpenShift can manage the deployment and scaling of these platforms to ensure high availability.
He responded to one of his critics by bumping off an obnoxious character named Platt in each book. O:-)