skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Almost no one does that though, so I'm confused as to the point you are trying to make? Even the people who do make their own bread usually don't grind their own wheat.
Article aside, it's very interesting to see the different attitudes toward drinking, how differently people consider what's typical and what's excessive.

It seems that the American posters here are outliers in that they consider 2-3 drinks several days a week to be excessive and problematic. In many European cultures this is actually quite normal.

It's been nearly 100 years since Prohibition ended, but it seems the Puritan ethos behind the movement is still going strong. It's especially pronounced when the conclusion of a mouse study aligns with that old ethos, while the data and logic supporting that conclusion remain tenuous.
Burrito: Cross-platform, single-binary Elixir deployments
To enable workarounds and/or stop the bleeding.

There's many places where no network is strongly preferable to network that could be open to hackers.
Seems like “airplanes are physically impossible” thinking, and if accepted as valid, strongly suggests that shutting down all development _might_ be a good idea, no?
I see your point, but honestly, the only way I can respond to your question is with more questions.

Why do we expect deep psychological or philosophical insights to make things better for us, or lead to “improvements”? Why do we think that a profound revelation will bring clarity and resolution to our lives? It could just as well make us more crazy.

There’s the famous case of the “Rat Man”. Whether Freud cured him is up for debate, though he most likely didn’t. But it’s a deep mediation on neurosis, obsession, cognitive dissonance, love, hate. It raises more questions than it answers but it's incredibly insightful. It gets at the heart of human fragility and I think that's something to take seriously.
https://www.wired.com/2012/06/larry-ellison-island/
All it takes is a simple tiny change to the user agreement and then OpenAI will start training on this user data and most people won't notice in time to switch their toggle off
> Portland was home to the UX designers who wanted to redesign everything to look nicer but didn't understand how customers used our products

I think that's every single piece of modern software to date. I call them "Dribbblrs", because it's like they take inspiriation from these websites (e.g. Dribbble) that fetishize things that look pretty but are dogshit to use. I really wish it would end but I don't see it happening unless there's a revolution from within the UX community (which I am not a part of).
Rising costs mean food companies are making snacks, sodas taste worse
Some DA's sudden refusal to prosecute a variety of property and drug crimes is a good example. No use catching criminals if they're just let loose.
I assume they’ll try to repopulate the world and use their least favorite children as laborers.
I read somewhere else that they have a full time staff on site.
You can leave a row or two free for the descenders, and it doesn't look too objectionable. An 8x8 grid is plenty for a useful character set. Some examples: https://damieng.com/blog/2011/02/20/typography-in-8-bits-sys...

There's even a couple of 6x8 ones here: https://damieng.com/blog/2014/07/20/typography-in-bits-other...
Didn’t it say cubic meter, not square?
It's also interesting to note how many of these systems are still running on a daily basis for 50+ years now. Stuff like your airplane boarding passes and hotel bookings still use all-upper encoding because these systems go back to the 1960s [1]. Cheques and other bank documents still use those MICR typefaces, which are similarly still encoded in all-caps [2]

[1] https://media.ccc.de/v/33c3-7964-where_in_the_world_is_carme...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_ink_character_recogni...
They seem to do some rate limiting, if you are sending requests too quickly, the request to write_db2.php usually returning nothing starts returning Christmas greetings.
Whisky 2.2.1 (Wine wrapper for macOS)
No it's not. WGPU (a WebGPU renderer built with rust) which is what Deno is using under the hood in this change, works perfectly well and is used by many other projects.
Even if that were not the case Chrome's WebGPU implementation is also available separately and it's called dawn.
I also always had access to it but I never saw the harm in it, always knew it was unrealistic, the same way an action movie is.

FWIW Instead of protections that will be eventually breakable, What I would like is more a mandatory disclaimer saying that everything about it is unrealistic and that its pure entertainment.
Oh! Thank you for the update. I had missed that.
Uppercase is numerically 65-90, lowercase is 97-122.

The numbers for uppercase can be represented in fewer bits.

"To implement a major change like lower case (keeping 6 bits per character in my syntax table instead of 5 bits) would have been a horrendous and risky job to do by hand." - Steve Wozniak
It works with Headscale.

https://github.com/juanfont/headscale
Okay.

* Zimbabwean dollars aren't being made anymore.

* Lunacoins / Terracoin isn't being made anymore.

Do these have any reason to go up? And they are (were) real currencies / cryptocoins.
Neat, can you share a link to "Privacy and Data Policy" they mention?
Does anyone have a recommendation for a replacement? After the requirement to create a cloud account on their so-called "Pro" Dream Machine I already felt something is wrong, and after "Please don't use shielded Ethernet cables with our so-called "Professional" WiFi Access Points, they can randomly reboot"[1] and now this nonsense, I'm just simply done with them.

But I really like the hardware of the Dream Machine Pro (Router, Switch with 10G uplink) and the overall view of clients and connected devices, so I don't just want to buy some random Router and pair it with random WiFi APs - though I guess that's the best choice?

[1] https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/8823742725015-UniFi-6-...
It becomes easier to answer if we have two return values: the start and end of the matched range, this is more general but less convenient
No, AT&T is still shipping with a router that cannot hit more than 50% bandwidth on any of 3 devices from under 5 feet. With one wood + pressboard wall between me and the router, 25%.

This is symmetric gigabit product, but still.
I thought we were still orders of magnitude away from that?
> We believe superintelligence could arrive within the next 10 years

I'm not a fan of allowing corporations to control and define terms like AGI and superintelligence in ways that profit them, but perhaps it is our fault as a society for not producing stricter definitions of these terms. Seems to be a pervasive problem with terms in the sci-fi domain - we have 'hoverboards' these days, for example.

Putting aside that lament, I wonder if we're heading towards another iteration of learning the bitter lesson [0]. It seems that the incentives presented here are trying to circumvent approaches that overly favor human oversight, but they still seem to overly emphasize human understanding.

[0] http://www.incompleteideas.net/IncIdeas/BitterLesson.html
Supernova are powerful enough that even a star in a different solar system going nova can kill you, if it's a "nearby" system. But I believe there aren't any stars close enough that would go supernova any time soon.
Have you ever been wrong about something or was it always attributed to someone else's idiocy?
I think the premise is dubious as well but since they are deadset on creating this intelligence, they might as well try to figure out a way to control it, hopeless as it may seem.
It's not censorship, it's age verification. You can still access this stuff if you can prove you're an adult. Same as how children aren't allowed to buy the same material in stores. It's still being published, there's no censorship.
Turning on AI by default seems to indicate they're sending your data somewhere automatically before seeking approval or opt-in. I could be very wrong, but the wording alone would at the very least make me cautious.
I index 40M paragraphs of legal text, bm25 and vector similarity search, at < 200ms query time, on a single $80/month Hetzner server. Email in profile if you’d like to talk.
Running CollapseOS on an Esp8266
This makes an esp8266 emulating Z80 mnemonics and runs a Forth interpreter on it.
I see what you mean. This doesn't apply to users with a numeric code though, since that uses a different UI element.
Is a safe LLM not an ethical LLM? Control within what boundaries? All three of these words seem to be used interchangeably when people discuss returned information from models. Which is exactly my point it’s poorly defined yet championed as a center piece. Meanwhile you have other companies spitting out acronyms consisting of vague terminology.
Look, this is always a pointless debate to go back-and-forth about because it tends to become more dominated by emotion than logic.

What I will say is that I do believe all the incidents described in the article were tragedies, and sadly preventable. And I do believe there were breaches of protocol by officers at the scene in all of the cases.

But I just plain don't believe that the turning point moment for Richards and Trawick was the officers' decision to use force. If a mentally ill person has reached the point of charging at police officers holding a knife (and/or whatever Richards was doing with his knife and fake gun), they were already failed, woefully, by society and by their support network.
No you're wrong. It's not just some optical illusion. It's a seemingly paradoxical statement.

From the perspective of the observer nothing enters the black hole. This is true.

From the perspective of the person entering the black hole he does enter it. It's because of time dilation.

Both of these statements are true according to theory as far as I know.
And the execs of GM explained to your dad that they were embarrassed by a few left-wingers?
I was referring to the specific argument I quoted, not to the Facebook audio conspiracy it was applied to, since it is also being applied to Dropbox/Open AI where the numbers are much smaller. I think the technical arguments in the Facebook case are compelling enough on their own.
Yes the superhuman AI would need to be coerced to remain politically correct. How can we coerce an AI?
You’re right.

The only point I’d like to point out is that the minimum requirement is 25/3Mbps with the option to bid for a higher tier that comes with more subsidies but also locks you into the higher requirement.

Starlink made a bid for the higher tier that requires 100/20Mbps and now it turns out that its plans don’t sufficiently establish how they’re going to meet those requirements.

While Starlink was able to achieve 100Mbps down in some areas (albeit not consistently), it is nowhere near 20Mbps up.

But with everything this man is involved in, he has a loyal army of fans who will carry water for him, no matter how much the facts say otherwise.

Who knows, maybe if I’ve spent $600 on a dish, I too will try to rationalize it by becoming a cheerleader.

Talk about embarrassing.
> Why would they need to be recreated? Windows ports of vim and emacs exist

I think you are missing the point here. It's not about litterally rewriting them, but about copying their design. It'd be nice to see a new advanced text editor written using what we've learned over the last 40 years and about usability, discoverability, etc.
This reads a bit naive and “assume good intent”-y for me. Look at what’s happening outside of AI for a decade: everyone’s eating data like a compulsive hoarder. Not just Google and Facebook who are actually using it in their core products, but everyone. Today I discovered that a mini-site of Swedish traditional recipes I’ve been using for Christmas has added autoplaying videos, dark-pattern cookie consent banners, the usual. Almost every new app/site is oriented around this economic axis.. and then the sudden coordinated lockdown of 3p APIs right around when LLMs starts getting strong.

And now we have ChatGPT/OpenAI and their competitors.. if the other players eat data like a secret midnight snack, current-gen AI is like zombies (the fast and twitchy variants) starving for blood and brains. Both because data serves a more direct role in the product, but also because of the typical hype-train-race psychology of tech VCs has been woken from slumber by the first potential paradigm shift in decades.

All circumstances point towards zombie apocalypse/ gold rush / ask for forgiveness later / etc etc. I strongly believe that’s why they’re (all of them) doubling down on the safety/responsibility rhetoric now, before the inevitable reputational PR crises (plural). Get ammo to muddy the waters early.

Meanwhile we techies are lulling around like we didn’t deeply just experience the last 10 years and thinking it’ll be different this time because.. AI is rooted in academia? Flashy new companies? The safety rhetoric? Edgy Twitter takes from “down-to-earth” founders?

I don’t pretend to know exactly what goes on behind the scenes but I’ve been around long enough to know how people work. And they haven’t changed for the better.
Thanks for sharing! You might find this post of mine interesting which extends view-mode to have common navigation keybindings. http://yummymelon.com/devnull/enhancing-navigation-in-emacs-...
redwood.com
Centralized scheduling, job chaining, workflow management, used to be called Cronacle.
Weird hit piece stating information one could already publicly find. Flagged.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/Pearl_Ha...

Relevant, given computing's roots in military matters.
>There are probably reasonable ways for the government to do this. Some kind of government run validation website where a user can generate a code to validate their age to each individual website is probably ok (in the UK we have a similar system for providing driving licence information to rental companies for example).

Why not just the parent sets the child device to "kid mode" and that is it.
otherwise how do you make different national systems work World wide ?

Your idea is valid but seems much more harder to implement. With my proposal where the parent and the OS vendor collaborate on this seems much more flexible and would work even better, like religious extremists could configure their child and their own devices to block much more then porn.
Flojoy: Open-source LabVIEW alternative for Tektronix scopes
Open-source test automation drivers for Keysight, NI, and Rohde & Schwarz hardware also available. Easily extensible through Python API.
Lower-cased letters have both ascenders and descenders. Fitting both of those in 8 pixels is doable but leaves you with either the clipped ascenders or mangled descenders that you see in old 8-pixel lower-cased typefaces - your method works, but the results are poor. Upper cased Latin letters are far more amenable to rasterizing down to small sizes than lower cased.

Though the real reason behind the question is that teletypes printed in upper case, early computers copied teletypes and followed that convention which carried on through the 8-bit era.
No. This is a logical contradiction.

Edit:
I mean the comment you are replying to is showing there is a logical contradiction.

If the AI is capable of critical thinking then it will independently form its own judgements and conclusions. If it simply believes whatever we tell it to believe, then that is not critical thinking, by definition.
> Warmer if it's warm

Yes, but not quite for the reason you give. See below.

> colder if it's cold.

This I don't agree with. Cold air can't hold any significant amount of water vapor to begin with. It is true that a cold, rainy day feels colder than a cold, dry day with the same air temperature, but rain isn't humidity; rain is water, not water vapor.

> I think the deal is that it's more efficient at transferring heat to/from your skin.

Not quite. The deal is that your body sheds heat by evaporation of water (sweat), but water can only evaporate if the surrounding air is not already saturated, and the closer the surrounding air is to being saturated, i.e., the more humid it is, the less heat your body can shed before the air is saturated.

In cold conditions your body wants to retain heat, not shed heat, and the humidity in the cold air doesn't really affect that at all, because, as above, there just isn't enough of it in cold air to make a difference. What does affect your body's ability to retain heat is dampness or rain, i.e., water, not water vapor; the extra water (far more water than you would generate by sweat on a hot day, or than exists as water vapor in cold air) sucks heat out of your body because the water is colder than you are and has such a high heat capacity (even if it doesn't evaporate).
How to Conduct a Literature Review
You've described a technical problem, not a non-technical problem.

I'm not familiar with that device, but a non-technical user might not care about that "problem", as long as their device does the task they are intending to perform.
OPNsense can target UniFi gear? Does it manage the switching and APs too?
Agree. I'd recommend to start with static YAML though. Use kustomize for the very few customisations required for, say, different environments. Keep them to a minimum - there's no reason for a controller's deployment to vary too much - they're usually deployed once per cluster.
This is what we're doing. I think it's not only possible, but also necessary for applications beyond trial-and-error generation.
An excellent choice, I would have picked eastern europe, south america, or asia instead of finland tho.
Funny, because the entire industry is motivated to move away from x86 too. I wonder if he'd like that to happen.
Hawaii doesn't seem like an ideal place for this type of "survival bunker". The area still sees volcanic activity, and the islands are small and probably will get hit hard from things like tsunamis and rising sea levels.

On the other hand because it's on an island far away from the mainland continents it will probably be good for a zombie apocalypse scenario, provided none of the locals get infected.
I did the other side - I’ve had pet house rabbits. A wild rabbit is apparently lucky to make it to 2 years. High probability it gets gruesomely torn apart and eaten alive by predators.

Meanwhile a house rabbit can live on average 8-10 years, even as long as 12-15.
I said “WOW!” out loud.

An LLM can discover a new solution in high dimensional geometry that hasn’t advanced in 20 years!? That goes way beyond glueing little bits of plagiarized training data together in a plausible way.

This suggest that there are hidden depths to LLMs’ capabilities if we can just figure out how to prompt and evaluate them correctly.

This significantly broke my expectations. Who knows what discovery could be hiding behind the next prompt and random seed.
I'm asking this genuinely and honestly:

How can I trust a company about my data, when their whole technology's performance depends on scraping the whole internet and feeding to a model? Also consider the fact that the data I'm providing them is way cleaner than what they scrape.

Moreover, we (at least the older ones amongst us) have seen what Microsoft has done in the past, and said company is almost one with the same Microsoft, which is ready to do anything for platform dominance.

OpenAI, esp. when combined with Microsoft and the whole A.I. hype paints a very untrustworthy picture in my eyes.

I'm not against the technology, but how it's trained, developed, hyped and how the researchers in the ecosystem behave about the data they handle makes it very off-putting in every sense, esp. in privacy and ethics.

It's like looking into a proverbial sausage factory, but this one is way worse.
Electric shocks!
Interviewing my mother, a mainframe COBOL programmer (2016)
Great, I'm super happy you're using this opportunity to engage in the political system! Goal achieved.

I hope you find lively debate with the members who disagree with this bill, for both of our sakes.
Another way to put it is that teachers expect short inferential distances: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HLqWn5LASfhhArZ7w/expecting-...
Except the fallacy with this premise is that the other teams _haven't_ solved the problems, which is why the cybersecurity teams are necessary in the first place. Cybersecurity doesn't solve any problems that are inherent to computing and are unavoidable, cybersecurity solves problems that are created by the mistakes of other teams. It's an unfortunate truth and it's difficult for many people to swallow, but I have found in my career, which is nearly 20 years at this point, that this is true in every case that I have personally experienced. That is to say, if developers created secure software by design, and if infrastructure teams/operations teams handled their assets and processes in a secure manner, then there would be no need for cybersecurity outside of a few specialized roles.
submission title has been edited and is misleading

this makes it sound like I can enter a question and see the response

The real title is "We asked Bard and ChatGPT the same questions. Here's what they said."

The real content is (4) examples the author picked
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38645039
"Energy density" is a misnomer, it should be power density, since the kW is a unit of power (rate of energy generation), not energy.
> For the very same reason, it's not likely there will ever be a way to reliably solve this technologically.

How did you arrive at this? Because I'm optimistic and think that if the government sets the ground rules, porn distributors will find a way to implement it reliably (using technology) and continue delivering porn to their consumers.

We get age checked here in Canada all the time when we buy booze for instance. Why not enforce it here with something like an age verification?
One of the problems they were approaching was the cap set problem

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cap_set

> The problem consists of finding the largest set of points (called a cap set) in a high-dimensional grid, where no three points lie on a line. This problem is important because it serves as a model for other problems in extremal combinatorics - the study of how large or small a collection of numbers, graphs or other objects could be. Brute-force computing approaches to this problem don’t work – the number of possibilities to consider quickly becomes greater than the number of atoms in the universe.

> FunSearch generated solutions - in the form of programs - that in some settings discovered the largest cap sets ever found. This represents the largest increase in the size of cap sets in the past 20 years. Moreover, FunSearch outperformed state-of-the-art computational solvers, as this problem scales well beyond their current capabilities.
Note that your quote from GP only relates to melanoma. They also said "Cumulative sun exposure on the other hand causes the other types of skin cancer."

Its there evidence that the incremental tanning you describe actually protects you from skin cancer and will not cause other cancers? If not, this seems like a very reckless comment.
Most countries are "homogenous" nations with populations of below 10 million and low wages, so you're not actually saying much.
Iꜰ ɪᴛ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴄᴏɴꜱɪᴅᴇʀᴇᴅ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ʟᴇɢɪʙʟᴇ ᴡᴇ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ᴡʀɪᴛᴇ ᴀʟʟ ᴛᴇxᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ.
I agree @brtkdotse, that's why I was curious.
All users should be informed so they can decide if to pull the plug or not on their devices...