skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A bit hard to show someone the door who has more than 50% of the shares vote from dual class shares. He can only be booted if he votes himself out as CEO.
Yes. The app simply called "Chess.com" (it's a website and Mobile app) probably offers the simplest interface, along with nice breakdowns post game and guided tutorials.
Ya and the tax payer foots the medical bill. Show some humanity
If you think about how they created this from the POV of the game creation pipeline, then that probably is the way. If this is done by creating a shader on top of "plain old" 3D assets, then aside from the programmers/artists involved with creating that shader everyone else can go about their business with minimal retraining. There probably was a lot of content to create, to that optimization likely took priority over other methods of implementing this effect.
You still can not "could not train a deep learning model to simply read a product description and generate the appropriate codebase", unless the product is very, very, very simple or trivial.
I only have old hardware at home. How viable is to practice this stuff on my own projects (and I'd like to touch JS as much as possible, despite everyone being on python)
> There is clearly a Hamas presence at the hospital based on the video. Additionally, there are tunnel shafts in the complex that lead to dozens of meters of tunnels with wiring/electricity connected to the hospital. Granted, the electricity comment is impossible to verify, but the tunnel system is clearly there. I don't have any guesses of who besides hamas would have built/used a tunnel like that.

The Israelis are the ones who built the hospital and the ones who built the tunnels, their ex minister said this.

They know everything in it.

https://x.com/AJArabic/status/1727029106288808273

Even their evidence of weapons inside the hospital has been manipulated, they have changed the weapons multiple times while news were reporting on their "evidence". Even so, they said it's Hamas's HQ, but its a far cry of what they claimed, and what an HQ of such a birgade should be. The goal was to just destroy the main hospital in Gaza.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/17/idf-evidence-s...

> RE the school: It's kind of difficult to tell what has happened. Clearly the school was the site of fighting, but I don't see any evidence in that video showing point blank executions of anybody let alone civilians or infants as was described.

How about these pictures? Don't they remind you of anything

https://x.com/celinekasem/status/1734856596679778558

They have killed more than 20,000 and 11000+ children in three months. This is the largest civilian life loss in this decade, there is nothing even close to this, Ukraine is not close in TWO YEARS.

Gaza in 30 days(outdated statistics) and Ukraine in 563 days.

https://x.com/CGTNOfficial/status/1721620032541556978

This isn't a war.

This was never about Hamas, they are not killing people in the west bank, where Hamas has no control, they just want to kill all Palestinians.

Heck, at the start of their latest bombing campaign, they said "we are fighting human animals", this was never directed at Hamas, this was directed at the entire population of Gaza, the civilians, the doctors and of course the children.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/israel-defense-minister-human...
Because the AI controlled by humans is a tool, a technology, that can be used in various ways.

Are you worried about knives in general or are you worried about a knife in the hands of a particular person in a particular moment?
Hey all!
I'm one of the makers of Unwrapped, really appreciate the support so far, and of course, any feedback or direct contributions would be super appreciated. In terms of code, or design!

Try it out here: https://unwrapped.dev
Why bother to make it look natural when you can have a really awkward greenscreen-like effect for nostalgic and "artistic" purposes?
Paywall free: https://archive.ph/QbDvz
Kiel has a tiny airport that doesn't have any scheduled services, but they have a large port with ferry and cruise terminals.
Very inefficiently. That's not being glib you can simulate them just fine it just takes forever
in your footer, a wild colon "," under the Attribuly appeared. Get your Hyperball and catch it.
When ive been introduced to okr Ive really liked this concept to the point that i started to use them in my private life

But on the other hand i dont fully like them in my work life

First my job forces OKRs amount and treats them equally

So OKR like completing half day training and sharing the learnings has the same value as multi month engineering effort.
I'm with you there, but there are also readers who insufferably whine about typos and weird turns of phrase. Thus, books need editors, who limit the size of a book to the budget of the author or the editorial to pay editors.

We really, really, need better automatic grammar-checkers. I'm for one quite happy with the latest developments in that area, but it's not yet possible to eschew human editors even for rote tasks like line-editing or proof-reading.
(biscuit author here) you caught me, I can't help getting excited about the project XD

> Given a long-term token, can I create short-term, auto-expiring tokens?

yes, with attenuation: https://doc.biscuitsec.org/recipes/common-patterns#expiratio...

> Is there some revocation mechanism?

In a token, each block has a revocation id, so if you revoke a token, all the tokens derived from that one will be revoked as well. As for how to handle those revocation ids, it's the same strategies as in other systems, reintroducing some state to check revocation lists: https://www.biscuitsec.org/docs/guides/revocation/

> How do these things line up against JWT or OAuth? When should I prefer this, but also when should I NOT prefer this?

JWT has a lot of footguns, especially in the way it handles the list of algorithms, and libraries tend to all go through the same set of mistakes (a lot of them are stable now though). JWT are good to transmit a small amount of data, and are overall well supported. JWTs do not enforce any authorization system, you have to add one yourself.
Biscuit is very strict in how it deserializes and verifies tokens, so it avoids the usual JWT issues (partly by its spec, partly by an extensive test suite). Biscuits can be larger than JWTs, and can take longer to verify (one signature verification per block). Biscuit comes with its own authorization, based on a logic language, that can be both carried by the token and provided by the verifier. It has implementations in a lot of languages but is not as widely supported as JWT yet.

I'd say if you can live with JWTs containing a little data (like a sub to look up in DB) and a simple authz system like a RBAC, keep using it, that will work well.
But if you can benefit from attenuation (ex: per request attenuation https://doc.biscuitsec.org/recipes/per-request-attenuation and delegation https://www.biscuitsec.org/docs/guides/microservices/ ), then look into Biscuit, it can help
Are you suggesting the earth may be one giant computer tasked with finding the ultimate question ?
Besides the other comment which is quite correct, we're going to suffer from B far before we will suffer from A.
PLEASE read this as this is literally about thinking of center of mass as existing in more than 0 dimensions. the book is called The Zero Point Paradox and has everything to do about singularities
Yeah, that's why the monopoly argument is important. Not because monopolies are illegal, but some new competitor being aggressive is different from the established robber baron squashing potential competition using its establishment.

Epic as a game store is very much not a monopoly by any means. Game consoles are certainly an argument, but thus far none are dominant over the other. It would mostly be a problem if a new console jumped in and Sony/Microsoft teamed up to hardball it out.
It's a different style of introducing a fantastical setting compared to the classic exposition dump, or the clumsy audience- substitute narrator who keeps asking for explanations, but it's far more engaging if you just let yourself enjoy the ride for a bit.

For example, I believe that early on the narrator speaks about his mother 'going to Heaven' - you're supposed to be curious about what exactly that means, since it's clearly not the same way we use the phrase. You're supposed to look forward to the eventual explanation, and to trust that there will be one.

Of course if that explanation never comes, and the detail is critical to the plot, that's a failure of the author. But no different from any other plot hole - that's what reviews are for.
The best site imo is Papers With Code. State of the art benchmarks, the papers which achieved them (along with previous papers) and github repos to actual implementations.

I wouldn’t recommend papers to absolute beginners though. For them, it’s best to go to HuggingFace, find a model that seems interesting and play with it in a Jupyter notebook. You’ll get a lot more bang for your buck.
chess.com has different "AI players" with personalities that you can play against.
oh and for OAuth, it can integrate well with it: https://www.biscuitsec.org/blog/oauth-oidc/
At this moment, the company that launches rockets into space is planning to gain the majority of its income by providing high-speed Internet access… so customers can access communications services like Meta.
I'd argue backprop is still handy just to learn the basics

It doesn't have to be production ready of course, but spending 3-4 hours to write it out in code, debug a few steps, ... are useful in my opinion.

or at least watch the karpathy video and try to follow along
may i ask where you live? I’ve worked outdoor construction as a teen for a while, even up till now, I’ve never seen mist sprayers in use round here in Germany.
Would you think that imposing heavy fines, and perhaps even criminal penalties when workers are not properly informed, would be a better alternative to banning an economically advantageous product?
For an awake power state you almost certainly have at least one core waking up more frequently than 10Hz just to handle poking devices like the GPU. HW power management (such as through wait for interrupt instructions) operate on a much smaller time scale and so you wouldn't really be perturbing anything on a real interactive system.
More so than limiting the depth of search, the "level" knob in Stockfish makes it select suboptimal moves with some probability.
In the actions overview, just the spinner icon (svg w/ css animation) takes 25-40% cpu and 10% gpu in my chrome. Enough to keep my fingers very warm on the laptop
Okay, but that assumes that control of AI is as trivially easy as controlling a knife. Given that this is one of the key unknowns, assuming that the AI never does anything that its controller doesn't intend is begging the question.

That aside, I can also think of many cases where I would feel less safe around a machine that had nobody in control of it, than one being adeptly controlled by an operator.
check if: if any one of those fails, the entire authorization fails
allow if/deny if: they are tried in order, we stop at the first that matches. If an allow if matches and all checks passed, then the request is authorized
I guess it also could 'maybe' lead to people dying... under the right circumstances.

In other words: just marketing.
> small in number, maybe 30-40 core dependencies

I consider 40 to be a lot, even for a huge enterprise project. I think without major refactoring half of them can be replaced with simple utility functions.
Idea! Shopify has a ton of resellers that sell junk from China. If you figure out how to avoid them, your life would be 10x easier.
I recommend David's Shapiro series on Systems Thinking that can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/@Systems.Thinking

It deals with more than just software, as it can be applied in many systems.
You don’t need your own hardware. You can use Google Colab for free.

Most of the action happens in python. That being said, there’s a library called Tensorflow JS. It has some pre-trained models you can use off the shelf and run from your browser. Things like face detection and sentiment analysis.
Language models are also hugely important for robotics applications. One example of significant LLM-powered increase in capabilities is this: https://youtu.be/CnkM0AecxYA?si=zXSj4MK-9snDQgL3
AT&T owned Bell Canada but sold it decades ago. Nortel was a direct descendant of that.

My understanding is that when Verizon tried to enter Canada, Robelus lobbied hard to keep it out.
That is a valid reason to worry about B, but not a valid reason not to worry about A!
> And strength has long been the domain of machines, couple machines with AI and you lose all of these as well and you lose them faster.

I don't think rock climbers need to worry about Stockfish.

We're going to lose to specialized machines every time while putting to shame any general purpose machines of our own creation. At least for a while yet no machine is going to match the breadth of our capabilities and our self-sufficiency.

It's no surprise that something that is optimized for being capable of many things can get beaten by a thing optimized for a single purpose.
Isn’t all the information public, it seems to require additional permissions from github so I abandoned?

Or optionally it would be nice if it could do a more bare unwrapping based on public only info.
Yep but sometimes it acts in mysterious ways. Also the whole blue hue thing when I'm focused on the road is quite annoying.
Unfortunately many of these "comparison" websites have a businesses model built on affiliate fees.

It doesn't take much imagination to predict which products show up as "best" or "cheapest".

And the fairer ones have to keep playing cat and mouse with shops lowering pricing when they detect a scraper coming by. Or employ tricks to make their shipping seem free, lowering their overall price on the comparison platform.
With 2015 Macbook, I do not have such luxury
Why is this on GitHub?
Presuming you want to work in the field and already have software development experience why not look at the confluence between ML and engineering?

Things like ML ops, application of DevOps, testing and ci/cd in the ml space, how to train across multiple gpus, how to actually host an LLM especially at scale and affordably.

In my experience there are hundreds of candidates coming from academia with strong academic backgrounds in ML. There are very few experienced engineers available to help them realise their ambitions!
Is there a significant advantage for capturing using DSLRs vs using the phone camera of a decent phone?
> The US copyright regime is a real rats' nest of complexity

The likely alternative would be (even more) retroactive copyright extensions which would be much worse.
Right, I kinda see that point, but I'm also not sure how I feel about the code search issue. On one hand, I agree that it makes the user experience nicer and can aid conversion, but on the other it's easy to abuse the feature (in a few ways off the top my head).

Some of the things you highlighted (ie the social network effects) are best experienced when logged in, and other than "just" browsing, there's not much in interaction for logged out users already (can't host code, open issues, comment, star, etc). I think allowing people to browse code and its history, alongside other parts of the platform for logged out users already feels pretty open to me
Sure, you can fork it but your fork will never reach the same level of security as the original simply because you cannot afford to put in the same effort as Google does.

My point is that these forks are futile because it takes only one major vulnerability - found by Project Zero and publicized with Google's might - to blow you out of business.
Berlin climate startup ecoworks using a high tech blend to decarbonize buildings
The main thing I noticed in Germany was open construction sites with little to protect pedestrians walking through, lack of any kind of masks when working with fumes or dust, no ear protection, and no hardhats.
Not in all countries though. Amazon isn't present or popular, or as omnipresent in many countries.

That's an opportunity, I guess.
I don’t shop there myself but a couple of visits tagging along with a shopper I was impressed with their bread section - head and shoulders above the typical supermarket bread. But looks like you bake your own bread (which is awesome).
Netlink, auditing, and counting bytes (2020)
Bun v1.0.18
You have to have this trust with any software you're using. Is not feasible to inspect source and install from source every package/library you use. Any of them can hypothetically run rm rf and include it even in a minor update.
I don’t know if AI is a pressing threat but the slow march towards general intelligence is actually pretty incredible to witness. A year ago I would have found it hard to believe something like chatGPT could exist in my lifetime, now it’s rather easy to visualize what it’s doing in that “word predictor” as something very close to abstractions similar to what humans do. It feels like all that needs to happen at this point is the spontaneous eruption of a meta hypervisor that would “think” about what those abstractions are and boom you have consciousness. All of it doesn’t seem impossible anymore. After all, humans evolved a brain under the same physical universal constraints and with the same set of initial building blocks.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terror_management_theory
It's not just "the simplest interface", it's the de-facto application/web page for playing Chess. You'll find grandmasters like Magnus Carlsen and Hikaru Nakamura playing there. You can access their games and every game ever played on the website. You can track your performance, analyze your games, train with puzzles, play against various bots, etc.
Perhaps, though still my experience seeing building sites in the UK still seems to have way more health and safety and risk assessments. As I said in the other comment, in Germany it's not rare at all to see road workers with heavy machinery, fumes, and dust, who are wearing no ear protection, no goggles, no mask, and no hard hat. That would be an extremely rare sight in the UK.
Ducati and Bentley collaborate on limited edition Diavel
Get beyond the "so what?"
We need a catalog of simple refutations of bad arguments and common misconceptions about AGI risk, with a short domain like agi.lol, so we can respond to comments like "I bet the guy who has spent 20 years worrying about AGI didn't think of this" with a simple link like agi.lol/107 or agi.lol/the-human-can-have-an-ai-too.
> might have already ran into cpu bugs

Not only that. There were microcode updates which disabled CPU features (most notably TSX). During process startup such features might have been detected as available and decided to use optimized subroutines. Disabling features while the process is still running might either severely degrade performance or outright crash it.
The problem is that we don't know how to use AIs the same way we know how to use stockfish. They're inexplicable to even experts
If you upgrade regularly, maintain sufficient business-logic testing to catch breakage, and regularly audit your dependencies for those which are no longer maintained so that they can be ripped out and replaced with maintained alternatives, then you're fine.

If you skip any one of those, then your full-time job is longer about shipping features/value but just trying to get the damned thing to work.
> First of all I was talking about thermal baths were bacteria do not survive anyway.

Large Roman bathhouses had multiple pools with different temperatures.

> Romans did not know antibiotics or bacteria or how infections worked

That’s kind of my entire point. The overall quality of life is much better because of what we know.

> d better maintained compared to today.

I’m not sure what saunas or swimming pools you go to but I certainly don’t believe that they are as dirty and unmaintained in general as you’re implying.

> If we were putting the same effort 2 thousand years later, we should be living in a literal heaven.

I think that by ancient standards we do (in the developed world). Humans are just very adaptable.

> but definitely nothing of to the kind of the organized crime we know today as mafia or cartels.

Because most things modern criminal organizations engage in were actually legal back then. Some of stuff they do now were just standard practices in the Roman society, which was structured a lot like the mafia organizations were back in the 1800s (a lot less secrecy than now).

> The greatest threat were pirates, who, as the name implies, only attacked ships sailing in the open sea.

Romans were generally pretty afraid of being kidnapped and sold into slavery even when traveling on land. In cities gangs and organized crime were certainly a huge issue in poorer parts of the city of Rome as far as we know.

> things we can learn by studying it

you’re right... I’d suggest you get some books not meant for 8 year olds if you’re really interested in the field. They might not paint such a straightforward picture you seem to have in your head, though

Anyway, it’s quite funny that we’re arguing about this. A very weird position to take by you considering most people back in those days lived in such horribly abject conditions you seem to be somehow incapable of comprehending.

And politically and socially too. In comparison to the Roman empire all but the very extreme modern authoritarian regimes would seem like egalitarian utopias (if we focus on human rights and the rule of law).
Ivermectin is not part of what I'd call alternative medicine so it is quite irrelevant as to whether any promotion of such is based on a profit motive. What Ivermectin is - and what most likely caused it to be the black sheep to those who instigated its banishment - is dirt cheap. This makes it more likely that the actual profit motive did not lie in those promoting Ivermectin but in those who called for its banishment since there is hardly any profit to be made on something that cheap.
(biscuit author here) I tried a lot of different formats, especially looking for something that generated small tokens, that could have a canonical form, and that was supported in a lot of languages. The canonical part was a dead end as most formats did not support that well. Protobuf ended up being the one which generated the smallest tokens, and was easily supported in most languages, even if, like you, I don't agree with everything in the way it's serialized.
Self describing formats were a dead end as well because it grows the token size
It's really a question of fidelity. A typical brain has on the order of 100B neurons and 100T connections. This machine can perform 228T "synaptic processes" per second so it has reached the right ballpark. A synapse can fire more frequently than once per second, so there are some orders of magnitude missing there.

The rest of it comes down to how complex their simulation steps are, and where they have losses in fidelity because they have not captured a realistic model of how the biological system works.

There is a lot of marketing hype in the title (its an SC announcement), but they can probably do something interesting with this system.
Official statistics (in Spain, which is where I'm from and have read them) don't agree with that. Plenty of construction workers and various related workers, like plumbers, etc. have died from asbestos.

As an anecdote, you could even die from asbestos from working at a TV station... The Spanish public TV station used asbestos as insulation in stages and apparently, when there were vibrations from loud sound, applauses, etc., dust particles fell on the workers and public. A famous TV anchor, José María Íñigo, died from that, as well as other workers from the station.
Hallelujah, i'll give it a try over christmas break
Western Norway. The rock here is high in quartzite I hear, maybe that's got something to do with it?

Surely you use mist sprayers during building demolition though? That's where I first saw them.