skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean, just because it's not solving problems relevant to what you're working on, doesn't mean it's not solving problems. The implications of a relatively fast universal runtime that can safely sandbox untrusted code are quite far-reaching, and it will probably take a while to see the end-game. Docker and containers have been around for a fairly long time, and while the uptake of containers to solve problems has gradually increased over time, it's still nowhere near the peak. I think this is likewise true for WebAssembly, which has more potential than we currently know what to do with.

Personally I think the focus for web technologies should be deprecating old things and being very judicial about adding new things. New things that get added have to be maintained by all browser engines effectively forever, and this is part of why every browser engine is a huge multi-million dollar per year endeavor just to maintain. Meanwhile, a lot of features being added to browsers don't necessarily justify all of this cost. Layout engines are unmanageably complex already. CSS is unmanageably complex already. I think adding even more stuff is hardly the solution, but rather, we need to figure out how to actually utilize what's here better before we can actually come up with successors. Rather than adding more scoped CSS and CSS modules junk, I'd rather just have improvements to CSS-in-JS. Maybe some targeted new APIs that make it easier to implement these features in the browser, not entire new paradigms that require implementing hundreds of thousands of new lines of code that will have to be maintained indefinitely. Likewise for web components: the concept is fine, but every browser has to maintain all of this forever, and all of the edge cases that come from it; will it yield so much benefit from what exists today? Will it actually stop people from shipping megabytes of Javascript, or could they have already stopped doing that if they really wanted to, and all this will do is mop it around a bit? A large node_modules folder disappears when a web app disappears. A large Chromium source code checkout only continues to grow larger effectively forever.

WebAssembly though, gets a pass from me, because it's far more than "Web", but the Web part adds a lot to the overall package. It's just a win all around.
Thanks for that article.

> And you're all worked up over a baby that never existed. Explain it to me.

This is from the article:

A variety of evidence is available on Hamas' cruelty, which includes the murder of parents in front of their children and children in front of their parents. There were sexual assaults, rapes and mutilations, while some victims were bound and some of the dead were desecrated. Some homes were burned with the people still inside.

None of this is in dispute.

It goes into quite some detail.

So, I am worked up over this atrocity. I'm glad that I can relegate to fiction the image of a woman being raped while her baby burns to death in an oven, because that's nightmare fuel. It is important that the world gets the details accurate, so I would not say it doesn't matter. It does.

Just, I guess I don't understand - and again, I really want to understand your perspective - how, given all of the other depraved stuff that Haaretz confirms did actually happen, how that translates to Israel is necessarily lying? Like, Hamas admits to doing the other stuff, there's video of it. What is it about the story of the burned baby and 40 beheaded babies that, because it didn't happen, makes you so angry? Again, not attacking, I promise. Really trying to understand.
that's a different model, by stability AI.

Right now everyone is coming out with video models, and they're all very similar.

Stability, Meta, Google, Nvidia, tencent, Alibaba all have released either demos or code for Stable Diffusion based video generation. They're all fairly similar but slightly different architecture.
I only used Launch4j on Windows, but in the downloads you can find Linux and MacOS versions as well. At the bottom of the webpage it explains that it can be built on even more platforms, if you have MinGW binutils 2.22 (windres and ld only) on those platforms.

If I remember correctly, you can't just pull out the exe created by jpackage, because it doesn't contain the runtime. The installer installs both the runtime and the exe. The exe created by Launch4j also doesn't include the runtime, but Launch4j is better at finding a system-wide runtime, and can direct the user to a specific download site (such as adoptium.net) instead of java.com. If you want to have JUST a single exe, then I think GraalVM's native image is the only option.
People (including myself) often wear mechanical watches because they really enjoy the engineering/history/whatever of mechanical movements. To me, I enjoy getting to wind my watch/set the date and time/have a reason to interact with it. I enjoy that it's a conversation starter for some people (hey, nice watch!) and for others it's an opportunity to talk about something I enjoy. It's also nice that it's aesthetically very pleasing compared to a random seiko or electric watch.
I think there can be good remedies that can reduce the amount of harm. Like gambling is legal where I live, but only card rooms where players play against each other and not a dealer, the house just takes a cut. This way almost all of the money stays in the community.
I'm not sure if this pushes competitors or not. Apparently nothing is done with the internet speed at our area. I live in Anaheim, and I only have 2 options: AT&T (50Mbps max), and Spectrum (100Mbps+). The up speed is still very slow, the down speed is always horrible for both, somewhere around 10Mbps. I can't do multiple video calls at the same time. It's been like this for 10+ years.

Recently I have Tmobile 5G home option and it's a bit better with the up speed, 20-40Mbps. The download speed is flaky, not consistent, somewhere from 50Mbps-250Mbps.

There has never been any fiber option, I wish this exists here, even with 1Gbps option is like heaven.
>prosecutors tend to only bring cases where the defendant is clearly guilty.

>They like shooting fish in a barrel.

Desire to Convict is tied to many factors that aren't Ease of Conviction.

Ease of conviction is tied to many factors that aren't guilt.
The same compute resources, but not the same VRAM. It will more or less get you the same tokens per second as a ~13B model but should have significantly "higher quality output" than a single 13B model.
I’ve worked for and with many people who’s stress response is to try and control everything, especially the flow of information (read as hoarding information and giving people the bare minimum, and often less than that).

It inevitably leads to more stress, not just for them, but for the whole organization. I’ve never seen it play out well long term and wish I had a good way to call it out and correct it. At least I can more clearly see the pattern now that I’ve run into it a few times.
So much of the current tech companies derive at least part of their profits out of restricted interoperability. A legal precedent allowing adversarial interoperability would be the death of any "engagement"-based business model, aka most of tech nowadays. Alternatively clients would pop up left and right that will strip out all the "engagement" nonsense (as well as the spyware/malware), and those will no longer be stoppable by legal trolling.

Such a move would completely kill off VC's (already sick) golden goose. They would lose more than what they'd win.
> What Microsoft did with IE isn't really analogous to Apple refusing to let another company free ride on their infrastructure.

Zoom out for a moment and take Beeper out of the picture. The issue is not Beeper specifically, it’s the underlying reasons that Beeper even exists.

If you buy an iPhone and want to interoperate with friends/family on Android, the default experience is extremely broken.

Apple’s behavior here is directly driving users away from Android, not because Apple is better, but because it’s the only way to actually use the native experience.

I don’t know if the cases are equivalent, but there’s certainly a case to be made that they’re in a similar category.
> The Beeper client has no right to interact with Apple's servers in a way that involves faking an Apple authorization.

I'm not completely down on the implementation details but is there really anything "faked" here. If they have a service that client and authenticate against using an Apple ID and I just use a different client with my Apple ID then nothing is "faked". It's just implementing the protocol.

> Apple has chosen not to provide an iMessage client. The mere possibility for one existing does not mean Apple can be forced into providing or tolerating one, given that it involves cost on Apple's server side, no matter how small that might be to them (how can you even tell?).

I agree. But if they're going to provide these servers on the Internet without any sort of paid authentication and I can utilize them with an alternative client then I'm going to do that. They don't have to tolerate it.

I also use an adblocker when I browse the web.
The original paper by Shazeer suffices. What you are saying is in theory possible to do and may have been done in practice here, but in the general case MoE is trained from scratch and specializations of layers which develop are not products of some design choice.
Everyone acted in good faith - the lawyers, the judge, the jury, the victim. The problem is a system that believes eyewitness testimony is slam dunk evidence.
this might be the “best outcome” for some nerds or android users, but it certainly isnt the best outcome for most consumers.

iOS has resisted a lot of the crap and cruft of windows and android because of its opinionated nature. sure, siri could use improvement, but at least iPhones never fail to call 911.
> As the wikipedia page you yourself are citing, overturned on appeal.

So the law says "Don't do behavior X", the government takes you to court, there is a judgment, you appeal, and win the appeal.

I'm not sure "dismissed on appeal" means "this isn't working as intended".

Successful market regulation includes investigating issues, prosecuting them where there is reasonable grounds to do so and it also includes a determination (either in investigation or in court) that something is not an issue.
While a lot of progress is made by chipping away at something, sometimes an idea arrives apparently (very nearly) all at once. At least one of the ideas in patent GB2594749, now in > 10E5 devices, came about arguing with a colleague about why something simply wasn't possible...
But the embedding space is deliberately and laboriously constructed such that it represents realistic things at as many points as possible. That's what the training is, right?
Whomever leads the productivity of 40 hours to result in 32.

This should be reasonably possible with all of the overheads that are impediments to progress given a consistent effort level between 32 and 40 hours.
If you’re referring to the history, then it cannot talk to the iCloud keychain, and even if it could, it would require your credentials. Same thing if you are just talking about incoming messages, they need your credentials. If they have those you’re already fucked. And also, they could just have taken an iPhone and log in there with your credentials.
I'm OK with titrating skepticism on a proposal based on the motivations of the proposer.

To Godwin a bit, I'd treat "we should make the trains to Auschwitz run more on time" differently depending on if it's being proposed by the German government in 1942 or the Polish government in 2023.
Loras can often achieve that look. No weights though but that would have likely worked to skew it in the 'amateur video' direction.
And the /r/antiwork modteam removal message seems like an AI rejection message as well. We have gone full circle.
I think for any reasonable version of that rule, an FPGA version would be good enough. And I'm pretty confident that if it was necessary for the patents, they can and would have built basic FPGA versions.

So while there are certainly adjustments to make to the patent system, I don't think that particular rule would have changed anything here.
Sorry, I misunderstood the previous comment. I thought you were worried about other people pretending to be you to your friends to trick them.

Is what you are asking this?

1. I install Beeper.

2. I log in to Beeper with my Apple ID, for the explicit purpose of accessing my own iMessage data.

3. ...

4. Gah! How could Beeper access my iMessage data even though I installed and authorized it just so it could access my iMessage data?
Correct conclusion. Wrong pretense.
Yahoo was originally a text file small enough to fit on a 1.44 floppy disk
Diet is an interesting angle, do you think diet would contribute to a better sleep? I tend to find a high quality sleep leads to a energetic day for me.
It looks like the article was intended for x84 UEFI and then they changed the title to Raspberry Pi for the clicks. Nothing in the article applies to the RPI, nor mentions it.
There were the semen samples taken, but this was before DNA matching.
That is a misapprehension of what I wrote.
Ask HN: Can you identify a cancer cell's host from its DNA?
Criminals (especially murderers) are often convicted at least partially by matching their DNA to evidence left at the scene of the crime (hair, skin, blood, semen, etc). DNA labs are getting really good at matching smaller and smaller samples of cells with their host.

Cancer cells are different. They are created when the DNA in them is altered through mutation and/or outside influence. As I understand it, the DNA in a cancer cell is different from all the other cells in your body.

Does anyone know if it is different enough that it cannot be used to successfully identify which host a sample came from? If the only evidence left behind by a criminal was some cancer cells, could a DNA lab say it came from them?
This is about a different model than stable diffusion. You're using SVD I'm guessing, the weights here aren't released.
What do you perceive to be the hallmarks of religions that cults don't share? My understanding is that people who study them mostly consider it to be a matter of cultural legitimacy, and so don't use the term cult. They call them new religious movements, since their novelty is their main tangible attribute and it's impossible to know in advance which ones will catch on and become reputable religions.
Without knowing anything beyond "headline news" on this topic, is it anywhere near the recent nuclear water ocean release from Fuki- nuclear generating facility? I remember a few headlines, don't remember the geography/specifics.

Hell, most militaries dumped tons of nerve agents directly into deep waters, within just a few decades ago — "official policy" doesn't even surprise me anymore!

Hoping to be wrong.
You're moving the goalposts. Parent said "Beeper doesn't seem to offer anything that Apple couldn't do themselves."
I actually thought Google had given up on Google Fiber years ago due to incumbents using regulatory pressure to keep them out.
I’ve also seen where upper management dictates those below them to use it, but they want to be exempt from all of it, forcing teams to do double (or worse) work to handle the paperwork around agile, while also preparing bespoke reports to feed up the chain in each leader’s preferred format.
It's understandable Apple doesn't want third-party apps proxying Apple ID credentials. Ever.
My bad. Should have just used the whole username.
Some Caffeine Shots include very high doses of B6 and B12 vitamins.

## 2023-12: B6/B12 RDVs, RDV % Supplement Facts inconsistencies

5-Hour Energy nutrition facts:
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+hour+energy+nutrition+fact... :

> B6: 40mg: 2000% RDV

> B12: 500mcg: 8333% RDV

5-Hour Energy Extra Strength:

> B6: 40mg: 2353%

> B12: 500mcg: 20833%

Summit Red Thunder Energy Shot nutrition facts:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Summit+Red+Thunder+Energy+Sh...

> Kirkland Signature Extra Strength:

> B6: 40mg: 2533% RDV

> B12: 500mcg: 20833% RDV

...

Again,

/? b6 b12 male smokers https://www.google.com/search?q=b6+b12+male+smokers

"Long-Term, High-Dose Vitamin B6/B12 Use Associated With Increased Lung Cancer Risk Among Men" (2023) https://cancer.osu.edu/news/long-term-high-dose-vitamin-b6-b...
I don't really buy the security argument if: “some traditional WebAssembly compilers can decorate memory accesses with bound-checking code. w2c2 currently can’t, but it totally could.”

Also, in my experience, naive bounds checking will eat up a lot of cycles. But maybe the C compiler can eliminate a bunch of them.
Fntastic announces shutdown four days after releasing "The Day Before"
To be honest, given Apple has already committed to adding RCS support next year, the market for this thing is limited anyway. Apple has said they won't implement Google's encryption extension, but your average person doesn't care much about that anyway. They just want to be able to group chat and send media to their friends.
> I struggle with the freedom for personal choice to do what you want vs the collective better situation we get to form for ourselves as a society by banning these things

I'd say for many things it's no choice at all and it's why we have laws in the first place. You rights to speeding in front of schools are being suppressed everywhere. As is your right to homicide, infanticide. Any -cide really is not within your right to perform.

It's what living in a society is all about. "Every man for himself" is natures law; it's what we struggle to overcome and be better. I don't think we would have gotten where we are without rules that govern society.
I drink decaf coffee and caffeine pills to control the dose nowadays.
It looks like it became a pet project. If they really took the goal of nudging the ISP industry towards better service through competition, they would care more about expanding their coverage.
https://archive.is/8uFyy (original website requires JS)
Absolutely. Google even announced Google Fiber was coming to some cities.... then the incumbents stepped up and offered affordable Fiber connections... then years later Google retracted the promise it was coming, and now will not offer fiber in those cities.

So basically they called their bluff, and that was enough.
Firefox actually uses this technique to harden some components:

https://hacks.mozilla.org/2021/12/webassembly-and-back-again...
I mean I can do mental gymnastics to understand the sentiment, but it really just comes down to individual preferences and definition of "use". To me, the usefulness of everything is in constant flux, and that's kind of cool to think about.
I haven't denied any such thing. I'm literally just saying it's a gamble.

Is it a problem? It seems unsolvable if so, unless we should ban CEOs from receiving stock compensation?
Crime in 2023: Murder plummeted, violent/property crime likely fell nationally
They needed something porous and compressible, so it sounds like a great choice.
Is that really the case? I was under the impression that part-time jobs in the US such as retail, food, etc. were so common precisely because part-time employees do not receive the same benefits (health insurance, retirement, PTO) as full-time employees.
Programming the hardware ("metal") natively would be more bare-metal than imp!ementing a hosted UEFI app that does stuff through UEFI APIs. In this case eg programming the VideoCore hw in the Pi.
I'm using ChatGPT for software engineering
Yes. Here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38603663

Basically judge told me I was allowed to use the Internet while on bail and joked with me that as long as I didn't use it for anything illegal.

Then when I retweeted the article "chaps" above wrote about EM not working etc, and I also tweeted about police misconduct (I was getting arrested every single day), it angered the local Sheriff's dept and they locked me up. The judge then basically made the most strained argument in history that he never gave me permission to use the Internet and that I was a bad person for Tweeting about the police under an assumed name (my Twitter account is also my name??). "Chaps" did his level best to help my lawyer, and we were 110% in the right, but the judge was days away from retirement, so fuck me lol
There was also a bunch of effort being put into efficiency of JavaScript. But now the tables have been changed and Microsoft is putting a large amount of effort into Python .
> I assume the iPhone 16 in fall 2024 will support Wi-Fi 7.

I wouldn't bet on it; Apple tends to lag behind on WiFi standards. The first phone to support WiFi 6E was this year's iPhone 15 Pro (the non-Pro 15 still doesn't).
Since we're not Apple, we don't know. But if we take their word [0] for it.

> We took steps to protect our users by blocking techniques that exploit fake credentials in order to gain access to iMessage.

> We will continue to make updates in the future to protect our users.

[0]: https://techcrunch.com/2023/12/08/apple-cuts-off-beeper-mini...
I don't live in the states and it's not a regulatory but a technical problem, living in a rented flat that has hardly a good spot for a PV panel to hang to...
> Messages will be sent and received via your email address rather than phone number. [...] Even worse, when iPhone customers added an Android phone number to an existing iMessage secure encrypted group chat, the Messages app would by default switch the entire group chat to using unencrypted, unsecure SMS.

These two Messages features combine to create a terrible UX. When someone starts a group chat in Messages and includes a single non-Apple device, it converts the chat into a group MMS at which point anyone in the group who was added by Apple ID email address starts receiving the messages via email with text messages arriving as text attachments to those emails.

The from/to addresses look like 2345678901@domain with domains such as mypixmessages.com, mms.att.net, mypixmessages.com, icmms1.sun5.lightsurf.net, etc.

It doesn't matter if you have a phone # associated with your Apple ID in addition to an email address. If the person who starts the chat accidentally uses your email address (which Messages makes both very easy to do accidentally and very difficult to notice because Messages hides the actual address behind the contact name) and there's a single non-Apple device in the group, you get to be on the receiving end of a barrage of emails from which you cannot unsubscribe.

When Messages converts a group to MMS, it really needs to make it obvious which recipients are email addresses and which are phone #s... it should either not hide the information behind the contact name and/or for cases where a contact has both a phone # and email addresses, it should favor the phone #.
I think you're reading too much into the pauses, because his style is meant to be the equivalent of a lab writeup documenting his process.
I think I know what you mean, but the idea of "hating mouth noises" meant literally is funny to me because that's all that speech is
For an overview on Android there's this great website: https://divestos.org/pages/browsers

I'm using Cromite at the moment.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/ee/81/49/32f3812... is you? That's awesome!
Why not just Some Language -> C -> CCC -> executable? What is WASM bringing to the table?

Or better yet Some Language -> MLIR.
From your other comment it seems like this is a relic before dna testing. I’ve heard there are many samples of dna that have yet to be processed. Hopefully the circumstances don’t occur again.
My point is that there is so much other stuff sharing 2.4 ghz and it makes no sense to also have the most used wireless protocol also stuck in that same congested area. If we actually allocated spectrum in proportion to how people actually use it, WiFi should have a lot more available to use.