skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The found function is in here: https://github.com/google-deepmind/funsearch/blob/main/cap_s.... I'm not very familiar with genetic algorithms but it's pretty hard for me to imagine that they couldn't come up with this. I'd be surprised if too many people (if any) have tried.

On the other hand, as observed in Appendix A.2 of this paper, the non-LLM genetic approach would have to be engineered by hand more than the LLM approach.
aside from the magic features not working; SMS costs money.

On some mobile contracts it's pretty close to free these days, but international SMS's are certainly not. - not sure it's a common use-case but it definitely is a common use-case for me.

Ironically, iMessage not being available on Android causes the other messenger apps to be more appealing. Whatsapp/Facebook Messenger. -- because they can be more ubiquitous across friends.
But how long until this archive also joins the Google graveyard? If it were another company aside from Google, this might be more encouraging.
Oh boy.

I’m glad you asked.

Here’s what works for me:

- don’t plan too far into the future, the further you do the less specific you should be

I like annual visions for each area of my life, so once a year reflect on each area and think where you’d like to be a year from now. My annual time capsule I call it, is coming up next week and I can’t wait!

- do monthly reflections

I have a google calendar reminder that links to a journal template. Here I briefly reflect once a month on what’s working and what’s not in each area

This is more tactical. Habits and things to help implement the vision

- ad hoc reflection

When struggling with something or needing to evaluate, I’ll just open a doc and type. Stream of conscious style to get it all out there.

Then read it and pluck out next steps. Sometimes this means pivoting, sometimes it’s just a deeper understanding of why the path I’m on is the right one.

Sorry for the sloppy writing here. I actually would like to write this up better when I’m not on mobile.

Hope it helps
> why is there no Lambda-like serverless compute substrate that allows your function to speak a connection-oriented protocol, by externalizing the connection-hold-open and per-connection book-keeping state into the routing layer, such that your own function in the system could scale-to-zero?

Fastly Fanout + Compute?

(disclosure: Fanout tech lead)
Are they sharing the same iCloud ID or something? That's the most likely scenario to me
Zero Effort Credential Stealing from Mobile Password Managers [pdf]
What if I'm just playing Super Mario Bros?
CHECKMATE

Quote

The rise of AI is the latest and most anxiety-inducing chapter in the long, uneasy marriage between Google and publishers, which have been bound to each other through a basic transaction: Google helps publishers be found by readers, and publishers give Google information—millions of pages of web content—to make its search engine useful.

Google’s embrace of AI in search threatens to throw off that delicate equilibrium, publishing executives say, by dramatically increasing the risk that users’ searches won’t result in them clicking on links that take them to publishers’ sites. Most gallingly for publishers, Google’s AI search was trained, in part, on their content and other material from across the web—without payment.

…

The new search features are also a balancing act for Google, which has moved quickly to refashion its flagship product in response to the rising popularity of chatbots like ChatGPT. The changes risk damaging website owners that produce the written material vital to both Google’s search engine and its powerful AI models.

“If Google kills too many publishers, it can’t build the LLM,” said digital media consultant Matthew Goldstein, who was one of the first to sound the alarm about the potential impact on publishers’ businesses.

End Quote

What Joe Internet User sees is that publications open the door to Google in order to get search results, and clicks on their otherwise paywalled or nagwalled sites.

But doing so lets Google reuse their content, and “create” its own via AI.

My opinion? Since “news” is not unique to any organization, given that events are visible to nearly everyone, and with internet users instantly flooding the zone with conspiracy theories, the element of verification and trust is weakened.

Just read the unverified horror stories coming out of the Middle East regularly.

So, what’s really unique to news organizations amounts to editorials and the familiar clickbait. And AI can editorialize, as well as come up with recipes, reviews and so on.

Sadly, it seems that the world is in a dogfight between evil and greed. I say that evil (Google) wins because it can always train on your emails and work documents in order to be timely when all others shut their doors (except to generate those valuable Google “hits”).

(Outside the quote, this is opinion and highly speculative)
But someone is training their AI on it.
It might show up … who knows where?
To be clear, you can probably make a 1000 core x86 machine, and those 1000 cores can probably even be pretty powerful. I don't doubt that. I think Azure even has crazy 8-socket multi-sled systems doing hundreds of cores, today. But this thread is about CUDA. Sierra Forest will get absolutely obliterated by a single A100 in basically any workload where you could reasonably choose between the two as options. I'm not saying they can't exist. Just that they will be (very) bad in this specific competition. I made an edit to my comment to reflect that.

But what you mention is important, and also a reason for the ultimate demise of e.g. Xeon Phi. Intel surely realized they could just scale their existing Xeon designs up-and-out further than expected. Like from a product/SKU standpoint, what is the point of having a 300 core Phi where every core is slow as shit, when you have a 100 core 4-socket Xeon design on the horizon, using an existing battle-tested design that you ship billions of dollars worth every year? Especially when the 300 core Xeon fails completely against the competition. By the time Phi died, they were already doing 100-cores-per-socket systems. They essentially realized any market they could have had would be served better by the existing Xeon line and by playing to their existing strengths.
Explore Side Hustle Ideas to Make Money with AI
Explore
Side Hustle Ideas
to make money with AI
If they didn’t want me to receive the signals… they could not broadcast them into my house?
I tend to think of it more like chemistry, in that once you understand how the small parts fit together and impact each other, it helps understand and predict results when more complex combinations of those parts are mixed together. And you can look at a complex result and break it down to know what parts it is made of.
...

`if`, `then`, `else`, `while`, `return`

vs `goto`, `comefrom`

... Well, it's arguably superficially a better argument than Dijkstra's, but it doesn't account for `for`, so I'm not convinced.
Just because IBM stuff is legacy doesnot means it is slow. Almost nobody is moving from a commercial database (Db2 for z/OS) to PostgreSQL because of performance. It is all to do with huge licensing cost. Talk to any veterans nothing matches the speed and stability of mainframe. search about z16 (tell me anything that guarantees 9 nines of availability)
>falsifiability - the ability to be proven false. That's what it says in the dictionary.com link as well.

No if something is true, it does not have the ability to be proven false. That's the obvious meaning at face value. Your definition is the one that's twisting things up here.

A person with no legs does not have the ability to walk. The implication of your logic is that a person with no legs can walk. Just like how a true statement can be proven false.

The statement also doesn't deal with probabilities. So your probabilistic analogy isn't relevant. When you say something can be falsified that is entirely different from saying that there's a probability something can be falsified.

>EDIT: Try this - substitute 'testable' for 'falsifiable' and see if that helps ease the dissonance.

Why?

Of course it helps. Because you chose a word with a different definition. I already know what you mean. You can leave the word as is, I still know what you mean and it's still logically consistent with your point.

I'm just pointing out the inconsistency with the linguistic aspect of your word choice that leaves it amenable for other people to interpret it differently. The original point is moot. We're talking about a linguistic problem here. Replacing the word is side stepping the original linguistic issue.
Some missions blow up on the launch pad, or fail to reach orbit, or are lost mid-flight, or crash on landing. I wonder if the average actual mission length exceeds the average expected mission length.
Lua is fantastic for the config-as-code use case. Easy to read and write, with a lightweight embeddable interpreter, and it has almost universal library support across different languages/environments.
my colleague always gets this shit during our Zoom calls, and searching for "disable" or "off" on that page only coughs up Facetime-centric settings, and (for good or bad) searching for "zoom" is damn near worthless

I sure do hope that made some PM a bazillion dollars, because it's not a good use of glucose, and worse when multiplied by the amount of glucose required by everyone downstream who now needs to expend energy to learn(?) how to turn it off

Snow Leopard for life.
Hell, I’ve literally watched cops use their lights so that they could go to a damn donut shop more quickly. I couldn’t believe it as I watched them pull into a krispy kream drive-thru.

Seen plenty of obese cops too. No idea how they stay on the force.
Don’t forget about the classic 80s song “Radar Van” by Johannes Vonk and the Clogheads: https://youtu.be/F7_1rc8riNU?si=uuVIn26cZNPBgHPv
And that cat turd person.
Yes, they can be frozen but also cryptocurrencies could be censored by exchanges. That is the business of companies such as Chainalysis. Also, they can use mixers.

If they don't use exchanges they should build liquidity at many physical points to exchange to USD.
“Application Modernization” is a huge deal in enterprise. In practice this means some combination of “make it slightly easier to get production traffic to new Java apps” and “deploy a lot of Kubernetes clusters.” Really they want the former but the k8s became a proxy for the capability. It’s why IBM bought RedHat.

Hashicorp products are a very big part of this world. I’d expect that basically every IBM customer also uses Hashicorp products, but they may or may not have a commercial relationship with Hashicorp.
Thank you! Quick notes:
- Resizing instances after provisioning is a manual operation for now. We'd use the same backup machinery that exists to automate it; until then you could do it manually or we're happy to help through a support request.

- Yes, you can create multiple databases per instance.

- We don't support pgvector yet; initial extensions we have are those in contrib, with more to come.

- Going through a VM to fetch the data from/send data to file store is the most common

- We take backups automatically, with point-in-time-recovery available to the minute. We also allow you to "fork" a database using a similar approach: i.e. your database remains intact; you just add a new database to it from a past point in time (typically useful for dev, test and/or analytics)
Indeed, as someone who maintains a helm package it's mind-boggling. When I've been able to build k8s tooling from scratch, I've been reasonably happy with jsonnet [0], which is a constrained programming language designed for configuration. It has the property that it will always produce valid JSON.

[0] https://jsonnet.org/
If you fire your cops, all cops will refuse to work for your new department. This is the status quo in Oregon right now. Lots of money for new cops, no one applies.
It's "declarative" which is supposed to be good, and you can represent complex data structures without any annoying closing braces (like json) or tags (xml).

Plus, well, there's a disturbingly high number of people who think that semantic whitespace is a positive.
Good call. So this doesn't look like a blocker to SYCL compatibility. I'm interested in learning more about this.
Well you can get arrested and charged for pretty much anything. Will those charges stick, and will you have to defend them is the real question.

As for CP, in the UK and the US there is the defence that you were not aware of the CP, you should be fine, but you may have to spend time/money convincing cops/prosecutors that.

As for the repo on my account that got spammed with reports today there are 2 things to highlight 1) the reports were nothing to do with CP, but “Sexually explicit content suited only for mature audiences.” 2) the repo was a fork of GitHub’s own (discontinued) Atom editor, it doesn’t even have the files in question included in the repo. The email I got (will paste below) talks about files in another repo that were updated ~9 months ago (couldn’t be arsed to look into the files history to see if they had existed before then and that date was just the last time they were updated). My fork was from 2022 when GH discontinued Atom (was still using it for a couple of projects, so took a fork just in case, but ended up never needing it).

So the atom repo fork got restricted (would need to be logged in to GH to access it) for content it for what I can tell never even contained any porn, lol. Guess because the user in question also had a fork or just a repo with a similar name “atom-ng” someone or group mass spammed reports on those repos, because I got 5 emails from GH all with 1 min about this one repo that had been untouched for over a year. Anyway enough rambling, what follows is that email. Note the yiff folder never appeared in my fork at any time, but it was still flagged by GH

Edit: looks like my fork was flagged mearly because another fork of the atom editor had porn in it at some point even though my fork never interacted with that fork nor ever had porn in it, guess it was more “mass reporting” by the people than something done by GitHub themselves. I just deleted my forked repo, because I no longer needed it anyway.

—————————————————————

Access to the /atom repository has been limited due to concerns from our community that the contents of the repository may include the following:

Sexually explicit content suited only for mature audiences.

Going forward, users must be logged in to a GitHub account to view the repository and will be presented with a notice related to its content giving them the option of viewing the repository or discovering other content on GitHub.

You may contact us for more information or to request a review of this decision:

Appeal and Reinstatement

Visibility and access to your repository has been restricted due to reports of sexually explicit content located in the following directory: https://github.com/Alex313031/atom-ng/tree/master/packages/y... For more information on the relevant policy see: - https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/acceptable-use-polici... Please contact us as soon as possible if you wish to resolve this issue and remove the restrictions from the repository.
Well if you chase money then you are automatically contributing to the creation of AGI. It's just how it is.
Edge started as a reffreshing take on a chromium-based browser, then they regressed to absolute early 2000s bloatware-Microsoft. I was an avid user for about 4 years. Now I avoid it like the plague, except for their awesome “Read Aloud” feature. Can’t recommend Arc browser enough, it’s a browser built with craft and designed to streamline modern workflows.
The fortunate thing is there are measurable metrics you can hit and improve upon as an X-Ops team, but implementing those takes buyin from the org or enough freedom to go rogue and do it on your own.
Why isn't it linear?
> the experiment was actually testing something different than what we’ve all understood it to be

Even if this is true, whose fault is it? Is it Zimbardo's? Or is it all the academics and media hacks who ran with their own mistaken understanding of what the experiment was actually testing, without bothering to check their understanding against what Zimbardo actually published? (Not to mention all the supporting information that he went to great trouble to make publicly available, as he describes in his response.)

> one has to wonder why he never corrected the record

Trying to correct mistaken or intentionally false claims in the media is a never-ending game of whack-a-mole. Very few scientists have the time or the wherewithal to do this. Zimbardo published several peer-reviewed papers, as he describes in his response; that's the "record". Anyone who takes media descriptions of any scientific research as accurate is kidding themselves.

> its failure to replicate

Zimbardo's response specifically addresses this point (both in discussing the claimed failure to replicate by a British research team, and in describing other research which has replicated the main findings), so I don't think you can just help yourself to this claim.
When the last round of chemo is given to "destroy your immune system" doesn't it take like 2 weeks to see any signs of immune cells? I knew someone who passed away from leukemia last year because the various infections they contracted in that 2 week window caused irreparable lung damage.