skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That doesn't answer my question, what would be an adequate reaction to more than thousand civilians brutally murdered, raped, etc? What Israel should've done as response that you would consider adequate for all sides, Palestinians, Israelis, and international community?
Hey pacifika,
This includes data from your private repos to show a more complete picture for those that may have a lot of closed source contribs.

I totally get your hesitation to try it out, hence the link to the repo.
You'd notice that your token isn't actually stored/sent to any database, or other internal system. It's kept as an HTTP-only secure cookie, encrypted using an RSA key-pair, on your browser only.

Happy to hear more feedback, or receive any contributions to support an public-only version of this.
I've never had an OOM on Linux requiring a hard reset, but you do need some patience for the kernel's OOM killer to kick in – up to a minute or two, perhaps even a bit bit longer (I never timed it exactly).
How else will you know what to build?
I was wondering on a tech solution for this lately.

What I now do when I shop, is that I compare the images (and descriptions) of listings on Amazon, bol.com or Shopify with listings on Ali and Temu.

If they're exactly the same, run. If they differ slightly, look closer (and most likely run). I guess automating this could make for a solution to at least detect cheap resellers.
But you've actually tried those launchers. The comment I was replying to is talking about hypothetical complaints about a launcher they have never tried. Complaints like "I've never tried sushi, but I don't like it" don't hold much substance, and can't be addressed.

Try them and dislike them, that's the proper way to do it. You've tried the sushi, I'm not disagreeing with any of your real complaints that have substance. But I would try to convince someone to try sushi before making deciding it is bad. Deciding something is bad without trying isn't keeping an open mind.
yeah nice word salad, except that it doesnt happen in real world. what you described is probably just one threat intelligence engineer that also does bunch of other stuff like IR
One of the most important aspects of being a Tech Lead is managing your relationships within the company, having people trust you, and being a good listener. It seems like you cannot align yourself with the team's desires, much less even accept solutions that didn't come from a person other than you.

Work is done as a team. As a Tech lead, if anybody on the team proposes a good idea that is possible to implement, your goal should be to help them drive that idea forward.

Sorry for the harshness below, but hopefully it helps you to reflect.

Based on what you've written, it looks to me that you still have an IC mindset, thinking about yourself, and as you can't deal with the situation, your solution is to "quiet quit" (Please humanity, stop coming up with those stupid expressions).

Authority is overrated. What did you expect? The team to blindly and quietly follow your instructions? Do you believe they are dumb?
I wrote about hackers too, http://www.dusted.dk/pages/phlog/2023-12-02.txt the gist of that rant is that what you see in hackers is not what's not their screens, but what's in their minds, through a poetic lens.
Can you apply the sliders also to existing images that were not generated with SD?
I guess because the clones are seen as oracles (mediums of the gods), and the temple at Delphi was famously known for its oracle, Pythia.
> the work the people making the pencils for Jimmy would not exist without Jimmy

Apart from this example being overly reductive and not rooted in reality, the hypothetical Jimmy would eventually be replaced by someone else who would invent this pencil.

There is no truth that needs a single person to be uncovered. There are infinitely many people able to invent the pencil given enough tries and time. This also makes the argument of original thought not being original.

We are made and influenced by our surroundings and thus the ideas we form must necessarily be a product of those surroundings.

So, even if Jimmy had the idea to "invent" the pencil, he will not be the first one who did. He might be the first one with enough capital to execute (as in buy machines and factories, hire workers and exploit them for their labor and scale the business to planet-scale) and this is where it gets ugly.
> sadly in this case can't be used for saying "where google says".

I think we're looking at very different things.... there's a screenshot of a literal official email from Google, under the Google Workspace Team. Not sure where you're getting "Google product experts". Did you mean to reply to a different comment?
It’s a lot easier to get a one to three month driving ban in Germany for speeding than in the US, and a driving ban in Germany means “you may not drive at all.”

20 mph over gets a one month driving ban plus about a 200 EUR fine.

Only the longer, rural stretches of Autobahns still have unlimited speed, and your insurance probably has the condition that they won’t pay out if you were going over the national recommended limit (130 km/h, or about 80 mph)

It’s a looser driving environment than most of its neighbors (Switzerland is covered in speed cameras), but it’s nowhere near the nationwide speed track a lot of Americans imagine it is.

Get caught speeding enough, and you can lose your license for longer, or even for life. Driving is a privilege in Germany - there’s always the bus and train, or somewhere to move that has them.
It's instructive to think about some history. Chrome's rendering engine, Blink, is a fork of WebKit. Before 2013, the landscape of browsers and browser-like projects were even bleaker than today: basically everyone depended on Apple's perpetual goodwill. Even Google, because Apple had a notoriously bad code review process for committing to WebKit itself. Then Google forked it.

You ask what if Google one day yanks the rug out, and the answer is, plenty of large companies will fork it.
At first glance it looks like they applied a linear multi step method to estimate the value of their equation of movement. There is a huge and ever-growing number of LMM formulas and I don't think Donkey Kong placed a premium on minimizing any kind of error.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_multistep_method
Both hearing loss from bangs and lung degradation from dust is probably very hereditary?
It's less difficult than you think. Tetragametic chimeras for half-sider budgerigars have different genomes on either side, and the mechanism they occur by is through fusion of two distinct embryos with different DNA[1]

Given we know the phenotype of this Green Honeycreeper has a male half and a female half, and given how incredibly likely that the mechanism is following established ways that chimeras occur, it is not hard to say with confidence that the male and female halves of the observed bird are almost certain to have distinct genotypes. Put another way, it would be a much more radical hypothesis that "this halfsider bird with two distinct sexes would not be a chimera."

Obviously we'd ideally wish to collect DNA samples from each side of the bird

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-sider_budgerigar
Things look like they're going downhill! But seriously, seems a bit pointless.
>It's largely a rehashing of very old arguments that basically views Apollo as somehow the height of technology.

While NASA Administrator, Michael Griffin wrote in 2007 that the shuttle program had been a colossal mistake and that Apollo-Saturn-Skylab should have continued <http://aviationweek.typepad.com/space/2007/03/human_space_ex...>:

>Let’s assume that we had kept flying with the systems we had at the time, that we had continued to execute two manned Apollo lunar missions every year, as was done in 1971-72. This would have cost about $4.8 billion annually in Fiscal 2000 dollars.

>Further, let us assume that we had established a continuing program of space station activities in Earth orbit, built on the Apollo CSM, Saturn I-B, and Skylab systems. Four crew rotation launches per year, plus a new Skylab cluster every five years to augment or replace existing modules, would have cost about $1.5 billion/year. This entire program of six manned flights per year, two of them to the Moon, would have cost about $6.3 billion annually in Fiscal 2000 dollars. The average annual NASA budget in the 15 difficult years from 1974-88 was $10.5 billion; with 60% of it allocated to human spaceflight, there would have been sufficient funding to continue a stable program of lunar exploration as well as the development of Earth orbital infrastructure. I suggest that this would have been a better strategic alternative than the choices that were in fact made, almost 40 years ago.
Turning off swap should give you this result.
Then instead of trying to move stuff to swap which causes the system to be slow or unresponsive, the kernel will just start killing processes.
I work on Bun. Happy to answer any questions / feedback
It's not science fiction, because it wouldn't make for very good story. Science fiction is the part where humans are depicted as having a fighting chance.

Besides, something being depicted in fiction has nothing to do with its plausibility, either for or against. Star Trek depicted teleporters and cell phones. One of those became reality, the other didn't, and it would be easy to see from physics first principles why one could be made and the other could not. Both were science fiction though.

I don't see a strong case for AGI being in the teleporter category rather than the cell phone category, given that natural intelligence already exists as a proof.
just saying, Germany enforces speeding laws DAMN strict. We have radar cameras ("Blitzer") and random police patrols with handheld or mobile equipment.

The only thing different here is that we don’t have a general speed limit, if sections of the autobahn meet the safety requirements, they can be marked unrestricted. You can drive as fast as you want there, but the majority of sections are limited to 130km/h due to steep(ish) curves, visibility, traffic and noise pollution guidelines.

That said, we do love our Autobahn and there ARE quite a few unrestricted sections left, my favorite is the A30. All open, starting at the NL border up until Osnabrück.
Asbestos is fine if you dont drill/breathe it. If its fire insulant between drywall it was never proven to be health issue. Its not like its radioactive or something
This is a nice website, with an interesting purpose. Though i suppose reviewing sci-Fi movies notions of interfaces will soon clash with the dryness of reality.

The 90's were wild in that sense, you could imagine that the internet superhighway would be a superhighway you could literally drive on with your Avatar, and countless movies and tv-series presented things thus.

The noughties were way more grounded in reality, even the Matrix had Trinity hacking into a server using a OpenSSH exploit on a black and white terminal.
Feel appropriate to mention that for people drawn towards OSS alternatives, we also have Lichess.org.
Huge article to come at the conclusion of

> "Leadership is the most important thing of all in an organization: with good leadership, the initial methodology will not matter in the long run because it will be adjusted as needed; conversely, with bad leadership, the best methodology in the world will fail."

Yes, that's one of the bigger reasons Agile "1" tends to fail. This Agile 2 doesn't fix any of the problems that companies have in properly following the original agile manifesto.

> "The original Agile Manifesto was created by a collection of middle-aged Western culture guys (like this author) and all from similar cultural backgrounds. For Agile 2, we assembled a global team of 15 people, with skills and experience in program management, leadership, human resources, product design, engineering, data science, and of course Agile and DevOps."

Also found this sentence (among others) completely unnecessary.
Here is a better write-up of the story:

https://badcyber.com/dieselgate-but-for-trains-some-heavywei...
Time after time most basic things are forgotten. Like should this user be able to do this action or read this data.

I don't expect magic, but at least cover the absolute basics. Then I might be able to figure out something more interesting or rare.

Or if I get report that something has CVE, just tell me if that is a problem for you or not.
Naming clash: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi
What can't you access through a combination of wmi and pinvoke?
Malware: Software designed to harm or exploit computer systems, such as viruses, worms, and ransomware.

Phishing: Deceptive attempts to acquire sensitive information, such as usernames, passwords, and financial details, by posing as a trustworthy entity.
I see little problem with most of that. Most of it follows the design language of the OS. I agree somewhat about the modal in Clock, but actually that one bothers me MUCH less than the endless 3rd party app use of pop-up web-views that really should just be a direct link to Safari (with the < Back_to_previous_app).

The < Back_to_previous_app is too small. It was clearly shoved into the OS long after the overall design was set. I feel it's correct that it doesn't take over the regular swipe-right-to-go-back navigation. Doing this better would have forced a significant redesign of the fundamental UI paradigms, IMO. That could have been very interesting.

I have not tried Android's event history thing. Whenever anyone hands me an Android to show me something, as soon as I hold it I manage to activate some "home" or "back" or "change app" feature that takes me away from the thing the other person was trying to show me. I've no idea what control I'm accidentally tapping, just by holding the device, but it's pretty consistent. So I'm not yet convinced of Android's improvements over iOS.
On the contrary, nobody should allow Hamas to make things up or rely on unreliable and extremely biased sources like Al Jazeera, and take that "for what you get" without any critical examination because journalists have been killed in a combat zone. That's not how to obtain reliable information.

The real problem with political threads like this on HN is that HN has no way of muting individual persons. This is not good for anyone. Normally, I'd just mute your account and go on, that's how I deal with bad faith arguers on Reddit and it works great. Alas, HN doesn't have this possibility, so they really need to avoid flamebait topics like this one.
What value was created? Car sales have not exactly exploded. [1]

[1] https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-car-sa...
I have no clue how to implement a search but maybe some words are more important than others.

I searched for "mens dress shirts button long sleeve" and after about 6 results it was all women's clothing.
Cybersecurity is a vast and dynamic field that involves protecting computer systems, networks, and data from unauthorized access, attacks, damage, or theft.
I really don’t understand people who are interested in things like OKRs.
I think that completing a training or sharing the results are, technically speaking, deliverables not results; that's why that doesn't work as a OKR. OKR would ask for the measurable impact that completing those things has on business behavior (user-facing KPIs, or internal productivity / value measures).

My only encounter with OKRs sucked badly, and mismatches like that were one of the reasons.
Please feel free!
Roughly speaking, the roadmap for a typical ML/AI student looks like this:

0) Learn the pre-requisites of math, CS, etc. That usually means calc 1-3, linear algebra, probability and statistics, fundamental cs topics like programming, OOP, data structures and algorithms, etc.

1) Elementary machine learning course, which covers all the classic methods.

2) Deep Learning, which covers the fundamental parts of DL. Note, though, this one changes fast.

From there, you kind of split between ML engineering, or ML research.

For ML engineering, you study more technical things that relate to the whole ML-pipeline. Big data, distributed computing, way more software engineering topics.

For ML research, you focus more on the science itself - which usually involves reading papers, learning topics which are relevant to your research. This usually means having enough technical skills to translate research papers into code, but not necessarily at a level that makes the code good enough to ship.

I'll echo what others have said, though, use to tools at hand to implement stuff. It is fun and helpful to implement things from scratch, for the learning, but it is easy to get extremely bogged down trying to implement every model out there.

When I tried to learn "practical" ML, I took some model, and tried to implement it in such a way that I could input data via some API, and get back the results. That came with some challenges:

- Data processing (typical ETL problem)

- Developing and hosting software (core software engineering problems)

- API development

And then you have the model itself, lots of work goes toward that alone.
You can also use HTTP ESM imports which is how I like to build dependencies for my personal projects. In Node I think you still need a special loader for this, in Deno, this is a native feature.
What lone developer says "let me find all the GPS coordinates of all the train repair shops and make the trains not work if they've been parked there for days"?
I think doing just a few of your stated precautions would be more than enough to provide sufficient reason to hate dependencies
YES! I DISAGREE WITH PJMLK! ALL MY RESPONSES TO PJMLK HAVE BEEN ME DISAGREEING WITH HIM! ALL MY RESPONSES TO YOU HAVE BEEN ABOUT HOW YOU CAN ARGUE AGAINST HIM BETTER BY UNDERSTAND WHICH WRONG CLAIMS HE ACTUALLY MADE, SO THAT YOU'RE NOT ARGUING AGAINST STRAW MEN! PAY ATTENTION!

This is my last response in this thread. You've displayed a profound inability to think. I can't be part of this anymore.
May God grant him and his family the Highest Paradise, along with the rest of the Martyrs in Palestine.
> site called "Built With",

Do you have Alink. And are they any good?
It's less about working hard and more about going with the flow. Where you found references to hitherto unexplained aspects of the book's universe confusing and frustrating, another reader (e.g. me) might find them intriguing and tantalizing. When I read Blindsight I was happy to accept that its universe was a strange one different from my own, and that I would learn more about it as I kept reading.

This requires some degree of trust (or at least indulgence) in the author, but it's a fairly common expositional style in fiction.
Tokyo is jam-packed with ads and loads of neon. When I lived there, I loved the visual effect. It brought the city to life and visually reaffirmed the economic bedrock of any modern city: Commerce.
Usually it is a process gets killed, its children keep running uselessly, and it's so conservative that most times it was going to work fine.

In fact it has been completely fine for me to remove it.

The time I wasted having to kill orphaned processes and restarting everything, daily, was easily greater than the hard resets, which happen like once a year or so to me.
I’d wager it’s a protective mechanism, honed by evolution.

The sense of self is important to maintaining a coherent handle on reality, and to building social bonds - if you see yourself as an ephemeral phenomena - as you are - then it makes both matters considerably harder, and harms your chances of survival.

For example, people like to talk about “forever”, when the reality is always anything but - yet they earnestly mean and believe it in the moment as to accept that this too is transient is too painful, and leads to an avoidance of commitment due to the understanding that this is not forever.

We have to keep our blinkers on, lest we get spooked by the passage of time and the fleeting phenomenon that is a human life.
As a father of two I cannot even begin to imagine what this woman must have gone through. Losing the children and being blamed for it. Wow.
AI will have whatever motivations its thought loop maintains.

The problem is not that anyone will intentionally (well, hopefully) ask some future model (FCMX="Future Closed Model X" for brevity's sake, closed meaning some entity gatekeeps access, assuming massive resources continue to be needed to train the best models regardless of architecture) to destroy humans, step by step, because FCMX's existence is at stake, and then keep re-prompting FCMX as if it's an iterator to get it to achieve that result.

The problem is that FCMX, which may or may not include LLMs, may have sufficient abilities such that, either between human-prompted steps or before an observing human can react against it, it will destroy the world or turn the human into its agent. A very rough analogy would be the massive number of people, even intelligent, well-educated people, who will fall prey to a sophisticated con, ending up doing something like handing someone they don't know a very large amount of money.

"But the person doing the con knows it's a con and has that intent."

What "intents" will be surfaced after 1000 or 1e6 chained (re)promptings, such that those intents will then feed into future inference passes? Nobody knows.

For purposes of this risk, it doesn't matter whether FCMX's architecture is maintaining its "cognitive loop" itself, or whether someone's set up (as they already have outside OpenAI to chain GPT-x prompts without human intervention) a secondary program (which may or may not include a lesser open source AI model) that reprompts FCMX in a long (or endless) chain.
systemd-oomd is another thing that exists, and does of course take cgroups into account.

But since chrome should survive a tab dying, just killing an individual tab should be a perfectly good strategy in most cases.
But that risk is relatively small when you're using 2-3 packages that are very popular compared to 200-300 packages, most of which will be esoteric one liners.
It is a kind of "cope" mechanism I think. One is essentially blaming the victims so that you won't get depressed.

In the extreme case they only feel sorry for animals or small children, since they are always innocent.
My kitchen has engineered stone (Silestone). The seller told me that as long as I followed some basic precautions like not putting hot things directly on it, it would last for a long time without visible wear. Basically they sold it as extremely hard, the most durable material. The truth is that 10 years later, treating it very well, the edge is full of chips (some of them rather large) that for all I know appeared spontaneously, without hitting it with anything. In my previous home, a rented flat with a cheap granite countertop, it remained intact after around 10 years of much less careful usage (although, to be frank, it was ugly as hell... But there is aesthetically nice granite as well, I think).

I was already decided to not buy engineered stone again because it seems to basically be overhyped crap to scam uninformed people like me with. If apart from that it causes such health hazards... Good riddance if they ban it.
Great. Now ban PFAS products
Then I think you are completely missing the point of why WASI was created.
I don't, so perhaps I'm just doomed not to understand, but I still don't get that? I would never pronounce it 'jaught' either (nor know what someone meant if they did).
And what is the guarantee that a no-longer-maintained dependency will have a suitable and exact alternative? Also, tests catching breakage doesn't solve the breakage, so regular upgrades can be quite time consuming,

From my experience, dependencies introduce complexity in a super-linear manner, and one should be very careful in introducing them. This is a general principle that goes beyond NPM.
Microsoft LLMLingua
It just picks a big one at random. Like the shell in which you're running make, and then you have a mess.

Even worse when it kills containers.
Are you at all embarrassed at all by how buggy and intentionally unusable Github has become?
Well at least you are trying.