skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Once again: this is silly, because whatever conversation we are having about the standard, your ability to decrypt old messages would not have been impacted. Standard revisions don't turn the previous standard into secret forbidden knowledge.

What's really being asked for here is the capability to seamlessly continue sending messages with the previous, weak constructions, into the indefinite future, and have the installed base of the system continue seamlessly reading them. I think that is in fact a goal of PGP, and one of its great weaknesses.
Very cool. We have something similar at https://videotap.com, although a bit more focused on repurposing your video content into other mediums (written blogs, twitter threads, etc.)
> Why post a link that is off topic?

Examining the output seems like another interesting way to learn SVG until one can speak it natively.
>I just don't understand how one entity can have this much power, in this case they essentially are the government they could demand whatever the hell they wanted.

When you zoom out and look at the actors involved, this isn't all that strange. This is a strike - if the citizens of a country don't want to do business with a certain entity isn't that how the government, ideally, should work? Citizens should be able to demand whatever the hell they wanted; otherwise who does the government work for?
It's only hard to start a business if you are poor...
This is a wrong place for such questions.
Waait. OK. I get it. It's photons which make me look fat?
Is drinking 3.5 gallons of whiskey or rum per year that big of a societal problem? That's only a little more than 1 oz per day. If someone is drinking to the point of disfunction I would expect their consumption to be a great deal more than that.
Empathy is radically overrated. It leads to manipulation.
> retailers were stuck with the cartridges without the ability to return them

This was true when it came to dumping 3rd party cartridges, but that wasn't the case with Atari. Atari had a deal with retail that any unsold cartridges could be returned and exchanged for newer titles. So it was win/win for retailers -- just give Atari shelf space for carts and what was there would either sell or get returned. Zero risk to retailer.

This combined with the 2nd problem -- oversupply. What made matters worse is that for a while Atari was struggling to meet order demand. The 2600 was so hot that they couldn't fulfil 100% of retail orders. So if a store ordered 500 of something, they got 250 units. Atari built more manufacturing capacity, but sales still rose. So now the retailers were ordering 1000 units and only getting 500. The retailers got wise and started ordering a lot more than they needed, figuring Atari would only deliver half. Overordering wasn't an issue anyways due to the return policy.

The 3rd problem is that Atari expanded manufacturing enough to finally catch up with order volume. To make it worse the market had just started crashing. So now you have the makings of a perfect storm.

Retail orders double what they need, because historically Atari had trouble delivering. Atari actually delivers the goods in full this time due to increased mfg. Combined with the crashing market, this means that way too many carts were made. The carts don't sell, and semi trucks full of unsold cartridges start showing back up at the Atari docks.

Atari was blindsided, they didn't even understand what was happening at first. They were managed pretty chaotically anyways - like really badly -- and it hadn't mattered up until then because they were making so much money. Once Atari realized what was going on it was too late. They went from $300m profit in 1982 to $538m losses in 1983. They couldn't recover.

This is why there's a landfill full of Atari cartridges -- Atari realized that if they dumped the returns back into the market at a discount, prices would crater even more. So Atari actually lost less money by destroying the unsold cartridges.

What was crazy about the 1983 crash was that it took down the biggest company in that space. Usually the small companies go down but the biggest can weather it. This crash was so severe that it killed the largest company in the space. Imagine if a cratering phone market killed Apple, it was just that big of a shock.
Well, as a member of society, my vote goes to the market over, you know, cannibalism. Pretty sure that vote isn’t hanging in the balance of the Spotify CFO.
Thank you. Any non-fiction?

I do the same.
https://thealchemist.dev/reading-list/
Does Starlink matter at all in Sweden? I've always assumed they have robust Internet connectivity and 4G/5G like we do in Finland.
Never heard of that and that's not legal.
They used to have a web extension for Firefox and Chrome that let you re-connect by clicking on it. I know they deprecated that in favor of what they do now (which I think is partially facitilated by changes in how extensions are handled by both those respective browsers) but I do hit this issue more than I'd like as well
Those existing tools are poorly designed, if you read the article it has a link to the discussion about its design choices, which contains in turn discussion about all the problems with sixel https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/issues/33#issuecomment-2...
> The shift operators are literally the nicest and most innocuous design decision of C++ streams

Which just shows how bad streams are. Overloading the shift operators was a terrible decision on multiple levels, but you're right -- that's not the worst streams sin.
Don't forget there are also interactions with consumers, who will now be deprived of the ability to purchase Tesla products. Alternatives include buying from Volvo, a Chinese-owned company who only recently got a few middling EV options to market. Consumers in Sweden may be fine having their purchasing options diminished out of solidarity with the union, but these actions do have consequences for consumers.
yah this is the part that most people who owned a 1st gen spinwheel 5 button iPod g1 are trying to figure out ;) the only logical spot I could think of is maybe the copyright/TOC item?
I feel like purple is the new blue.
Given that PostNord is jointly owned by the Swedish and Danish governments but is not a government agency, it's strange that there would be a law that exclusively forces the Swedish government to use PostNord.

There's also nothing in the law that states that plates have to be mailed and cannot be picked up, that's a operational decision by the Transport Agency. It's required by law to provide plates so it will be interesting to see how this turns out.
So I got the book today, and I cooked the tuna pasta. I admit I was kinda skeptical at first (for no specific reason), but gave it a shot and it was a hit! Everyone (including me :)) said it was very tasty--and we actually meant it, we have "radical candor" at the table :)) And the material proof is that there's nothing left, it's all gone.

BTW there's a small technical issue--there are no page numbers in my copy (which was printed on demand, here in PL). I guess maybe they were too close to the edges and got cut?
No, it didn’t. I don’t think.

I assume they were referring to the first version they got Rockbox running on.

Does anyone have more details on that part of the story?
Thank you, Hunor. I found your CodePen. Wow. Looks like I'll be busy today :-)
"I've seen gluts not followed by shortages, but I've never seen a shortage not followed by a glut." -- Nassim Taleb
Why does everyone complain like it is an American issue? It’s an Elon issue, he hates unions and does it very publicly.

For decades, Ford and others have factories in Europe and have union members.
In the '80s the games were mostly being purchased by adults for children, while today PC games are mostly purchased by adults for themselves. (I also remember being encouraged to spend my allowance on clearance-bin games when my parents wouldn't buy them new.)
GonzoML on Gemini
I don't see that PensionDanmark files 13f filings so it is hard to confirm their holdings. None of the 128 EDGAR filings that reference them pertain to Tesla. It's possible their holdings are through an inter-broker dealer which would be strange for a national pension fund but possible.

The Swedish National Pension Fund had about 500k of TSLA shares as of their latest 13f.

Source: https://capedge.com/company/1318605/TSLA/institutional-owner...

DISCLAIMER: our company owns CapEdge.
I have in previous comments. =)
One project that came up on HN recently that was not mentioned in the "prior art" is Triplit which also focuses on a Local First architecture

https://www.triplit.dev/
> Tesla can't call force majeure on a contract it isn't party to

Yet Scandinavian workers seem to be able to join in on disputes they aren't party to.
I wish it would just use TOFU ("trust on first use") by default. It's not 100% fool-proof, but actually does cover a large number of use-cases, and is certainly better than nothing.

UI:

"billing@paypal.com: we never seen this sender before, be careful"

"billing@paypal.com: this is verified to be the same sender"

"billing@paypal.com: ACHTUNG! THIS IS SOMEONE ELSE"

You can of course still manually add keys, and you can even do automatic or semi-automatic key rotation with some new header (e.g. "X-New-Key: [...]" that's signed with the old).
Oh sure, it's all about knowing your requirements. I write raw SQL when performance or complexity call for it. My intention was to argue that both have merits, not that ORMs are the one true solution.
Equals is an actual spreadsheet with read-only access to your warehouse. It's used for analytics and accounting.

Plato is a visual database, similar to Airtable, with read-write (configurable) access to your production database. It's used for operations.
Required by who? What is this entity that compels government employees to work? Is it Tesla? If so why? Or is it their citizens, who are by and large supportive of this movement?
> Yet Scandinavian workers seem to be able to join in on disputes they aren't party to

Yes, there is a difference between association and contract. (As well as not doing something versus forcing someone to.)
Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don't know why.

Zuck: They "trust me"

Zuck: Dumb fucks.

https://www.esquire.com/uk/latest-news/a19490586/mark-zucker...
You're almost always better off buying individual stocks yourself. You can optimize your return in various ways, like tax loss harvesting to offset capital gains from other sources like stock options. There are cheap robo-advisors that can do this even with small amounts.

Also, you might agree with some activist fund exclusions, like tobacco or gambling.
It's a bit shocking, as Sweden is one of Tesla's most mature and highest-density markets in Europe.
Plastics are basically all endocrine disrupting chemicals (your body confuses them for hormones, usually estrogen). Even nylon has been shown to be a EDC. BPA was by far the worst of them and wound up diffusing public concern, getting the rest completely off the hook.
What are ANY consequential impacts of prompt injection other that the user is able to get information out of the LLM that was put into the LLM?

I can not understand what the concern is. Like if something is indexed by Google, that means it might be available to find through a search, same with an LLM.
In case anyone is interested I've been compiling as much factual information on arbitration here. Not yet complete but reasonably useful and well sourced

https://grimreaper.github.io/arbitration/docs/problems/
Incentives are powerful and scale.
Yes, but this uses only two plan-vanilla parallel scans, shown as a* and b* in the pdf.

In the sample code, that's two calls to PyTorch's built-in API.

That looks very efficient to me, almost like it shouldn't be possible. But I tested the sample code[a] and it works.

Not an expert on this, but I don't think I've ever seen that before. Have you?

[a] https://github.com/glassroom/heinsen_sequence
TaskWeaver: Code-first agent framework for planning/running data analytics tasks
> not compromising on principles

Not compromising on free speech worked well... Until he started banning journalists from Twitter.
Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing
I mean since the glorified autocomplete bots we call LLMs can't actually understand language, all we have to do is get enough samples of whale language and they can easily communicate with them.
Ask HN: Anyone else getting an empty landing page on YouTube while logged out?
Today in one of my browsers the YouTube.com landing page is completely empty aside for the sidebar menu and a notice that implies I have to log or grant google permission to track me in order for the landing page to show any content. I guess it's impossible for google to populate the landing page with something from all those trending pages filled with content...

I assume this is somehow related to the current adblock wars. Sure is annoying, especially as google has deemed this particular browser unfit to be allowed to access the throwaway account I had made for youtube.
> I'm waiting for people to start experimenting with the text mining and concordance kind of things LLM techniques can do on those data sets. There's already a market for that kind of thing, but those established systems are dinosaurs that will crumble with a push.

Those established systems have a wealth of expert human annotations and related information that is either not readily publicly available and copyright protected (including their own first-party data), including masses of licensed texts, as well as the ability to enhance what they have with usage data from their extensive network of existing professional and academic users.

Yes, LLMs will transform the space, but LLMs tied into the systems and proprietary data sets of the existing incumbents are likely to be the professional standard and way better than what is publicly available in the near term, unless the incumbents really fumble the ball.

That said, sure, public LLM based systems tying into public, noncopyrighted data can make what is available to the public without expensive subscriptions a lot better than it is today.
> the "personal AI assistant" is the best example, since prompt injection means that any time an LLM has access to both private data and untrusted inputs (like emails it has to summarize) there is a risk of something going wrong: https://simonwillison.net/2023/May/2/prompt-injection-explai...

See also https://simonwillison.net/2023/Apr/14/worst-that-can-happen/, or https://embracethered.com/blog/posts/2023/google-bard-data-e... for more specific examples. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.12173 was the paper that originally got me aware of "indirect" prompt injection as a problem and it's still a good read today.
I'm not sure I want to route all my email through my mobile phone.

Though yes... it's more secure than SMS.
It's pathetic how your position on violent strikebreakers is so lenient that you don't even feel them worth mentioning. Sort of a testament to how effective American brainwashing is.

It's equally pathetic that you think the role of the state is to expend unlimited funds to keep the enemies of private enterprises incarcerated, even when it would cost us all far more than adopting an enlightened policy regarding collective bargaining.
I'm not sure what's the definition of an "ordinary worker", but as an electrician in Denmark I could absolutely have a Tesla if I wanted to. Which I don't, I really like my Leaf.
What? The same laws that protect workers from being fired for being in a union keep them from being involuntary joined to a union or any other association unless they want to. Freedom of association is very strong in Swedish law.
That would mean each salt is about 36 bits. If you create 2^18=262k folders in your lifetime using the same algorithm and same password, there's a 50% chance one of the salts is dup'd.

Maybe we can wave this as good enough, but cryptography usually has higher standards.
What a fun discussion http://forum.6502.org/viewtopic.php?t=720
This isn't an agency-level decision. It's large numbers of individual postal workers not going to Tesla addresses.
https://forum.leasehackr.com *was* good, now a lot more "deals"
There's a huge range of possibilities between arsenic and "minor harm."

We have decent reason to believe they are active in the endocrine system, and pretty good reason to believe there are population-level endocrine issues (obesity and fertility).

Given that these plastics seem to accrue intergenerationally (i.e. babies are being born "poisoned" by them), an apparently minor, apparently not-very-acute issue could actually end up being a much, much, much bigger problem than any of the examples you listed.
It is interesting to read the comments. Why do some americans view the strike action in a black/white perspective?

If you define a strike very narrowly as to stop work with (partial) loss of pay, then this does not make sense. But a strike can be against one entity, one action or even one person. The workers can say "I will not do this action" and that is a strike too.
The [Finnish transport workers´ union] AKT decided on sympathy actions for Tesla
It does not need to exceed the rate at which investors acquire supply, because the homes investors buy are not removed from the market, they are just rented out, and increasing the rental supply will drive rents down.
You do understand that's not really what happened here right?

The concept IS called possessive apostrophe and literally until this minute I wasn't aware that "it's" isn't grammatically correct when the "it" in the sentence is being used possessively. I didn't just find an article I thought agreed with me and fire it off, I thought "it's" was valid and riffic didn't know about possessive apostrophes (which again, I had wrong in this case). I didn't look for "it's" in the article because that wasn't up for debate in my mind (again, I can't stress this enough, I was wrong about the usage, any comment I've ever made uses "it's" in this case because that's how I thought it was used), I was just looking for the concept as a whole to link. I got a minor piece wrong and you want to lump me in with everyone who picks the first article that "agrees" with them.
Completely agree. Even though there's no solution, they need to be broadcasting different ways you can mitigate against it. There's a gulf of difference between "technically still vulnerable to prompt injection" and "someone will trivially exfiltrate private data and destroy your business", and people need to know how you can move closer from the second category to the first one.
Is there something unique in mining lithium that would be different from other kind of mining that America does? I feel like the capability if needed to extract and refine it within the US exists / wouldn’t be hard to develop over the course of constructing the mine, no?

Also there’s a lawsuit ongoing here with Native Americans suing to stop any mining. I suspect that there’s going to be a lot of pressure to not start a mine because of how destructive they are to the environment. At the same time, I’m pretty sure the mine will happen. However, at that point you want to have the highest price of lithium possible and this is a substantial amount of lithium that would be coming on the market which would counteract any price growth.
The new Volvo EVs are actually really nice.
* [insert every example of "15 year old unknown vulnerability in X found" here]

* have to be a bit vague here, but while working as a research scientist for the US Department of Defense I regularly witnessed and occasionally took part in scenarios where a radical idea turned "expert advice" on its head, or some applied thing completely contradicted established theoretical models in a novel or interesting way. Consistently, the barrier to such advancements was always "experts" telling you that your thing should not / could not work, blocking your efforts, withholding funding, etc., only to be proven wrong. Far too many experts care more about maintaining the status quo than actually advancing the field, and a concerning number are actually on the payroll of various corporations or private interests to actively prevent such advancements.

* over the last 30 years in the AI field, there have been a few major inflection points, Yann LeCun's convolutional neural networks and his more general idea that ANNs stood to gain something by loosely mimicking the complexity of the human brain, for which he was originally ridiculed and largely ignored by the scientific community until convolution revolutionized computer vision; and the rise of large language models, which came out of a whole branch of AI research that had been disregarded for decades and was definitely not seen as a thing that might ever come close to something like AGI, natural language processing.

* going back further in history there are plenty of examples, like quantum mechanics turning the relativistic model on its head, Galileo, etc etc. The common theme is a bunch of conservative, self-described experts scoffing at something that ends up completely redefining their field and making them ultimately look pretty silly and petty. This happens so frequently in history that I think it should just be assumed at all times in all fields, as this dynamic is one of the few true constants throughout history. No one is an expert, no one has perfect knowledge of everything, and the next big advancement will be something that contradicts conventional wisdom.

Admittedly, I derived these beliefs from some of the Socratic teachings I received very early in life, around 6th grade or so back in the late 90s, but they have continually borne fruit for me. Question everything. When debugging, question your most basic assumptions first., "is it plugged in?" etc, etc

It's sort of at a point these days where if you want to find a fruitful research idea, probably best to just browse through conventional wisdom on your topic and question the most fundamental assumptions until you find something fishy.
Starlink is such a niche product in Sweden, it would be such a pointless move that would go by totally without notice. The vast majority of Sweden is covered by 4G and 90% 5G coverage is excpeted within a year. Broadband via fiber is ubiquitous and a lot cheaper than the USA (at least in the comparisons I've seen).

Can't speak about spacex not sure if any Swedish companies do business with them.
I will say there are a lot of teslas in Norway. For years they were one of the most popular cars sold due to generous tax breaks.

https://driveteslacanada.ca/news/tesla-model-y-wins-crushing...
That makes a ton of sense. Well, keen to hear what you (or The People) come up with as a more suitable alternative.
Just because he/she didn't explicitly type it doesn't mean they missed the lesson.
Data-stack-hub/DataStack: open-source framework to build real-time web apps
Likewise, RockBox is the only thing I’ve run my my current iPod Classic.

The first time I ever used Linux/gcc as a kid was changing the rockbox bootloader to boot rockbox by default on an iPod nano
The captcha has reCAPTCHA written on it and the Tor Browser does like 15 requests to google.com domains. None of the archive.is|li|ph|today domains use Cloudflare name servers and resolving archive.is from all over the world returns not a single Cloudflare IP.

I'm pretty sure they don't use Cloudflare.