skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks for the Q.

We have a high focus on utility and the brief component which is really what we're trying to hone in on.

The brief is completely automated based on all the research that goes into it, including competitor frequencies etc.

Most other tools have some sort of outline builder that you need to use to put it together in a more or less cumbersome process. (Semrush's works like that too i believe)

Keyword research is just a "necessary evil" to find out where you should be focusing your efforts, but we're centering around helping you find and prioritize the right keywords with algorithms that combine a variety of metrics into one single to digest score.

I agree with you that differentiation at the current stage is a bit blurry but what we're aiming for is to go from just your domain to a prioritized roadmap, including content refresh actions etc. based on existing content on the site.

But we're not there just yet :)

Hope this sheds some light, curious to hear what you think.
>Explicitly prompting the LLM to output a confidence score is the least accurate

They don't show the whole prompt they use for this so I am sceptical of the comparison that recommends their service which does the token level accuracy. In my short testing you can drill down some acceptable accuracy for specific domains if you lead it over some general "ask yourself" questions then "finally, output a % confidence"
A pixel takes more than 1 bit to store, too
> Being AI generated, they have no copyright.

Careful with this assumption. The US Copyright Office have said this. Some other jurisdictions may have similar statements. But few (any?) claims around this have been tested in court, and specifically there is still the risk that there may be jurisdictions that find the output to be infringing if the training data is.

It will take time for this to shake out.

I do mostly agree with you that I think enough doors will be left open that it will be possible to find paths that will effectively "work around" copyright in fairly significant ways, but it's not so open and shut what will be ok and what won't.
> Just like I would not bother to buy and use a bike lock if people would not steal bikes in the first place. It's a bad analogy though, like all analogies are, since if I sell my bike I can't make it stop working for the buyer at a later time. But that's the big difference between digital and physical.

That's not why your analogy is wrong, especially because some connected electric bikes allow that just like smartphones do. Here is a rewriting that explains why you analogy is actually (very) wrong: "It's a really bad analogy though, since if someone steals my bike, I don't have it anymore, while “stealing” in the digital world consists in making a copy. But that's the big difference between digital and physical."
Yes, the piracy is an indie song is precisely what’s under discussion.
Are you sure?

apt-get install solo-python

One can update the firmware.
Total fleet will obviously take a while to turnover, 93% new of passenger car registrations in September were PEV, 87% BEV, Norway has long led the world though in this area with very strong incentives for many years.
After an initial military response, take their time and specifically plan and target the terrorists who were responsible and organized the attacks on the 7.10. Yeah this will obviously take way longer and is harder than levelling Gaza but would avoid eventually bringing the entire world against you and producing much more terrorists than before. At the same time also try to make sure that the civilians in Gaza get humanitarian aid, so you remove the breeding ground for terrorism.
This approach was also suggested by Jocko Willink retured Navy Seal (https://youtu.be/3O4dW24az98)

But the mistakes happened way before by moving troops away from the Gaza border to West Bank to protect illegal settlements and also supporting Hamas as an opposition to PLO. Don't get me wrong. Don't get me wrong the world would be a better place without Hamas however your policy has to be strategic and not emotional (i.e. revenge)
Having a system where trust is embodied in a single entity is one valid solution. It's also not the only solution and I haven't heard anyone claim that it is.
Show HN: Skatespot is the only app that lets you track your runs
I think there is an information war Israel is still winning just because they have more media resources. Accurate and unbiased information about what is happening in Gaza is somewhat hard to find while Israel has a lot of reliable information supporting anything they want. The information that does come out from Gaza spreads farther, unfortunately a lot of which is wrong because people spread unreliable sources, but information from Israel supporting their positions is greater and more accurate because they have more media resources.
> the idea of having to go fetch my backup key out of a safe to register it (and hope the site allows multiple keys) just feels impractical

An alternative some people use is to register a TOTP code and print out the QR code. Then you can remove it from the app. It's not a full solution but it might be part of one that works for you.

> Wish there were a way around this :/

Sign in with Google/Facebook/Github. I wish sites supported custom OIDC but that's probably impractical.
Artists are not harmed, for sure. If you don't have money, you wouldn't buy it anyway. By pirating in that scenario, you are promoting it, and thus artist benefits.
It wouldn’t be a fallacy, it’d just be wrong, except it’s not wrong, and very basic concept that you can’t eat public goodwill demonstrates why.

And the entire concept of property is built on monopoly. Are you saying you don’t believe in property?
> a bit of piracy

Don't know about other content industry, but at least in video games, "a bit of" and "piracy" are oxymoron. Any semi-popular game has a significant number of pirated copy players.

Example: World of Goo claims 90% of players play pirated copies.[1] This is a game distributed without DRM and the price isn't high ($15 and region-based). 90% piracy rate is how customers respond to no DRM.

[1] https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/world-of-goo-vs-piracy
Not in the field, but don't forget the grid is dynamic and has feedback loops, control algorithms and humans in the loop.

It's closer to an unstable chaotic system which needs constant balancing and tweaking.
Yeah, after a bit of thought, this probably doesn't apply to the older nations almost at all.
Our poison is grandfathered in!

Some business models and ways of making money just end.

I wont get rich selling CRT monitors anymore, and I certainly do not get to keep my job because I got it a long time ago.

"Your position is no longer necessary".
i don't think this is true for the majority of tourism, and it's not even true for many who live as expats elsewhere. but it is certainly true for me, both as a traveler and an expat.
You do have a choice; do not consume the product. You are not entitled to art because you want it.
> since if I sell my bike I can't make it stop working for the buyer at a later time. But that's the big difference between digital and physical.

But that's the entire thing the article is about: That suddenly in the digital space, it seems to be not just normal but expected that vendors maintain control over a product even if it's sold.

> This could be regarded as DRM by some.

Indeed it is, and it shows the problems with that approach: As you say, even with the best of intentions, you can't guarantee that the DRM will only shut out illegitimate users: It might also deactivate legitimately bought apps if the licensing server has an issue or if at some point you don't have the resources to run it any longer. That makes a DRM-enabled digital product strictly worse than an analog one.

And that's if you're one of the good guys and don't get into any third party contract disputes, don't do any shady deals with user data and don't go crazy with subscriptions.

> But I would have never wasted time with this if people would not crack my app in the first place AND demand customer support and flood my dashboard with errors unrelated to the normal functioning of the app.

That sounds a bit like "I wouldn't have to put up this fence if people didn't keep jumping over it". What about permitting free usage but restricting support to paying customers?
It's an idealism, for sure; but after reading about experiments like Hamburg's maybe we'll get there eventually.

But what's far more important (and practical) than mandating libre software is mandating libre file formats, and this is what we've seen happen somewhat successfully around the world: governments requiring official documents to be primarily available in PDF/A and/or OpenDocument (c.f. OpenOfficeOrg/LibreOffice) instead of (say) MSFT's Office OOXML formats.
Seems like a great honey pot for the three letter agencies once they stitch it together with your stupid aunt Janice at 23andMe.
> It's not expecting to be able to turn it into a business, or a popular app, that wouldn't quickly be shut down. That's just common sense.

When I noticed that there is 2 dollar subscription required to use this app, then all my blame from Apple went to these developers.

You can't really expect to do business with other company's service's without asking permission or cooperating. Especially, if the required interfaces are not exactly public.

Maybe this App had hope as free version, but not as business. What they were thinking.
> why would Spain share everything with the USA.

Wishful (respectively forceful) thinking :)
Yep, shipping containers are stolen straight off ships to this very day, or ships are just straight-up hijacked. Real, actual piracy.
Thebloke just quantizises existing models what is the point of following him?
I had students that copied one-another's work; in fact I had few students that didn't copy. It made it impossible to mark their projects correctly, so I asked my more-experienced colleagues.

The best advice I got was to explain the difference between collaboration (strongly encouraged) and plagiarism (re-take the course if you're lucky). Forbidding collaboration is a disastrous policy, so an instructor shouldn't have a problem with giving the same mark to each member of a group of collaborators. You just have to test that each individual can explain what they've submitted.
There is plenty of evidence that just practicing is a bad way to learn things.
Sounds like a the classic: works on my machine; let’s ship your machine;
containers!
It’s okay.

Scrivener is deeply embedded in my workflow today and I don’t have the energy to chase after some old licenses.

More power to IA with this unusual notebook though. Am curious to see how it works out.
Catchy title and some of us read the slack link that's posted in the comments. But I guess also look at how many people posted the exact same response. Maybe they are right, people don't read.
You’re presuming all pirates only pirate what they otherwise would not purchase, which is impossible to claim credibly.
Exactly. People are overthinking this in vain. There is nothing you can do about it, take it as a fact of life - as long as there are digital goods, there will be piracy. Take this into account, do not fight against it.
Motte (principia) and bailey (process philosophy).
"Small government" helps a certain class of people.
The hazard button is also now a capacitive touch button. How are you supposed to operate that with gloves?
What do you imagine a solution here might look like? I don’t know enough about the problem space to truly know, but I feel like I’ve seen versions of this: I can authorize any arbitrary public key for use over SSH, for example; and (based on my memory of YubiOTP) it’s seemed like at least some of these hardware auth protocols work based on using an open serial number or public key to identify the authorized authenticator.

Intuitively it seems like it should be possible for me to store on my main auth device some form of the backup device’s identity or public key material, and at enrollment time, ask the authenticating service to trust either the current device or also this other device to authenticate me.

I wonder what risks I’m overlooking-surely there must be good reasons the protocol excludes that kind of approach.
> social contract

1. a contract is just an abstraction over a commitment to give it more salability. if every contract violation is a sin then so is me committing to meet you for dinner tonight but canceling because i'm feeling under the weather.

2. show me this contract. where/when did i sign it, and was i under duress when i did so?
A browser won't even work at all, as you need dedicated software (i.e. native app, TPM/TEE support) in order to play 4K media at full resolution, at least in Netflix's case.
A normal cartogram (eg https://worldmapper.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/USA_Polit... ) also shows rural population, and arguably much more clearly, due to the great discrepancy in population density between urban and rural.
Is it a 'meaningless semantic difference'?

If I told you I would give you X if you did Y for me, but after you did Y I refused to give you X, did I steal from you?

What if I told a prospective client of yours a lie about your abilities and they didn't hire you; did I steal from you?
…if you wanted full anonymity, why did you turn on DNA relative sharing? Why don’t you turn it off now? Or do you mean, you assume they could place your profile within a tree, if they wanted to?
I made it easier to partner with influencers, give me feedback
Hey guys, I made it easier to hire influencers using Fansta. We've been growing 100% MoM and so I'd love to have your thoughts on how to make it easier for the average business to partner with Influencers.
>(Where 'steal' is strictly shorthand for copyright infringement, but that's a pretty meaningless semantic difference outside of a courtroom.) //

It's not at all meaningless. If I take a photo of your house, I copy it, then I do not deny you full enjoyment of that house. If on the other hand I steal your house, I think you would feel a little more than a semantic difference.

Now, I might copy your house and build another from the same materials, which again is unlikely to feel to you like theft.

There are lots of other possible scenarios of course. Suppose you're the architect of the first house, you got paid, but not you're pissed off because you think you should get paid again despite having done no more work... but then it turns out people see both houses and they want a house in that style, so they come to and give you another few months of work. Do you complain about it being "theft" now?
> fails miserably to account for human behavior.

Agreed - the only system I know of that takes human behavior into consideration is capitalism and free markets.

> ARPANET [...] CERN

You do realize that the Internet is not just a set of protocols, right? It's people, services and companies all coming together in this amazing web. How do you think that happened? Who brought them here?

There is a long distance from Arpanet and Cern to Johnny getting his Tiktok fix on his smartphone. And it took a lot of private money and initiative for this to happen. Nobody's denying DoD's role in funding the basic protocols Internet relies on, but compared to what was added on top of that since then - it's a tiny contribution, to be honest.
I didn't know things had gone quite this far yet.

I have to agree. There should be legislation preventing this, or the pirates will be morally in the clear. Which does not help copyright owners. Yes, the pirate stole your content, but since you were going to revoke access anyhow he was stealing from a scammer which is justice.
Thank you but why was my comment downvoted?
Aliens of New York – Generative AI at It's Best
I think your analogy is flawed. With piracy, you rent a car and someone makes a copy of it, and you never lose the car you rented.
And honest answer: yes. People that would otherwise crack the app, still would not buy the app at my price, but started asking for discounts. Some were also honest enough to tell me that they previously used a cracked version, others I recognize from cracking forums.

I'm happy to provide such discounts when people don't have the means to pay the whole price. I didn't build the app to get rich, I built it to help people get control of their monitor brightness, and I'm working towards that goal.
MSFT when Ballmer became CEO in 2000 – $40

MSFT when Ballmer was replaced in 2014 – $40

GOOG when Sundar became CEO in 2015 – $30

GOOG today – $137

The situations aren't exactly comparable.
Copyright already has a lot of limitations. It has never been, nor been intended to, be absolute, because the point is to promote the arts and a too strict grant of rights would stifle it instead - indeed most places it is accepted that copyright is a significant limitation on the liberty of society at large, justified (or not, depending on ones opinions) by encouraging more works, but accepting it as a restriction means there is some degree of acceptance that it should not be more expansive than it needs to be (and many will disagree about whether the current length of copyright is or is not more expansive than it needs to be)

The only limitation that needs to be there for training on copyrighted works not to be infringing is to accept that extracting information about the work is not infringing if copyrighted elements of the work itself is not significantly reproduced.
We had this in the 80s with tanks of cars that didn't have anything like crumble zones. The entire force was absorbed by the steel frame. A lot of people died.
EU regulators reach agreement on outlines for future AI bill
How can someone has thought, they will create a app that can work with apple messages and they can make it able to work with android? Now they disconnected the access.You will never be allowed to have money over apple or google. Choose XMPP, it will reach there. who needs blue green bubbles lol.
Thank you so much!! Really glad you liked it!
What about the hostages?

What about border security?

Doing what you say would basically be letting Hamas have their win. It would absolutely embolden them to plan an execute further attacks.

The game theory is absolutely clear here. When an attack of this magnitude is carried out, you need to respond with overwhelming force to cutoff the possibility of further escalation. Stop it cold.

When Hamas invaded Israel and massacred civilians en masse, an invasion of Gaza was made inevitable. Restraint here is the significant effort that has been taken by the IDF to minimize civilian casualties.
Please, quit whinning.

Microsoft's been working on it for ages and they are almost there.

That's exactly the point of PMP in Windows (Protected media path) and (almost) mandatory TPM in Windows 11.

Not long now... and then you'll rent. May be even pay for the accrued mouse mileage, who knows.
> Jews will never accept being an ethnic minority after the last few thousand years of endless pogroms including from MENA countries, literal survival will always trump everything else

> that's the reality

I'm not convinced that you're actually looking for a peaceful solution. The best you can imagine is a permanent DMZ so that Israel maintains an ethnic majority? Do Palestinians get to decide what they want to do at all, or is that just for Israel?

A ceasefire is not really optional. If Israel continues with this genocide, as they seem committed to doing, then America's support will grow untenable. All Israel's atrocities - undeniable, caught on video and seen by the world atrocities - are only possible with the support of the US war machine.

The US just vetoed the UN's call for a ceasefire, despite 61% of Americans wanting a ceasefire. Do you see that?? That's 61% of Israel's staunchest ally, telling them they're going way too far. People are waking up, and they're wondering why the fuck we're complicit in war crimes in full view of the world (again).

How long do you think America can sustain this support of mass murder? It's morally indefensible, and a permanent stain on our history.
You need android an flash linageOs. Welcome to the club.
No, that’s not how the social contract works. You “sign” it by being born into the society where it applies, and you refuse it by leaving that society.
Is there still a lot of piracy with the goal to actually steal the goods though? My impression is that current-day pirates try to capture the ships themselves and hold them for ransom. (Genuinely curious though)
To add some numbers to sibling's comment, if a parameter is originally fp16 (a half precision float, I think this is what LLaMA was trained on) you need 16bit*7*10^9 ~= 13GiB of RAM to fit a whole 7B model in memory. Current high-end consumer GPUs (4090) top at 24GB, so these small models fit in GPUs you can have at home.

For comparison, the next largest size is usually 13B which at fp16 already takes ~24GiB (some of which you'll be using for your regular applications like your browser, the OS, etc.)

7B also faster since the critical path of the signal flow is smaller.

Training requires even more RAM (and the more RAM you have the faster you can train).

You could quantize 13B to make it fit in consumer cards without large losses (see e.g. charts for k-quants LLaMA inference[0]) but training on quantized models impacts more than inference (couldn't find charts here, I'm on mobile). But this means you could also quantize 7B models to run them on even less powerful GPUs like low-end consumer GPUs or even eventually mobile phones (which are also power-sensitive due to running on batteries).

[0] https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/1684
> Sure, but Google also has the moral right to do everything possible with their code to make it as hard as possible for you to skip ads on their videos.

The person you're replying to acknowledges this, albeit indirectly.

But the point still stands: if Google sends me the bits, I am free (morally, and, at least for now, legally) to discard the bits that correspond to the ads if I can figure out how to do so without watching them. If Google can figure out ahead of time that's what I'm planning to do, and refuses to give me the bits, that's of course Google's right.

> There's no brainwashing here. It's just a business trying to make money

Advertising is psychological manipulation to coerce you to buy whatever product is on offer. The "best" advertising will convince you that you need a product that you'd never consider buying otherwise. "Brainwashing" might be a sensationalized way of putting it, but I don't think that's particularly inaccurate.
Your first link redirects to Google.

curl -v https://probiorahealth.com/product/probiora/

> GET /product/probiora/ HTTP/1.1
> Host: probiorahealth.com
> User-Agent: curl/8.1.2
> Accept: */*
>
< HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
< Server: nginx/1.14.0 (Ubuntu)
< Date: ...
< Content-Type: text/html
< Content-Length: 170
< Connection: keep-alive
< Location: https://www.google.com
< Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
< X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
< X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
< X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
< Referrer-Policy: strict-origin
< Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(),midi=(),sync-xhr=(),microphone=(),camera=(),magnetometer=(),gyroscope=(),fullscreen=(self),payment=()
Spain is largely a vassal state of the US but also of Germany. As such, it depends on these countries for most of its intelligence. It would be counter productive for Spain to refuse cooperation given its membership of EU and NATO. Spain is on the firing line of NATO's "enemies" because of its relatively weak state, so it would be very audacious of Spain to betray its masters. Spain's political class certainly wouldn't have the appetite for it
> neuter themselves by playing video games.

What does that mean?

Does trying hard at dating mean not playing video games...?