skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
tldr; In 1968, the U.S. Army tested a deadly nerve agent called VX. The nerve agent killed thousands of sheep grazing near the testing site. The Army denied responsibility for the deaths. The article also details other instances of the Army mishandling dangerous chemicals.
There's a better way to grind coffee, according to science
And the fact this system is damping the natural motion of the boat means the boat is going harder into the waves - thereby most certainly nullifying any energy savings.
Android vulnerability exposes credentials from mobile password managers
Open the document in an editor and parse the script tags, find a way to reverse engineer it. It seems like you're just complaining for the sake of it.
I started using it to learn ZIO 2 about 1.5 months ago. First, it was nerve wrecking since it would only respond in ZIO 1 code. They must have caught me swearing at it relentlessly. I'm getting better results now ;)
Due to working from home, I tend to reverse commute in my area rather often while running chores, and I can't understand how people sit in that traffic on a daily basis. It must be maddening.
Grid battery storage would have to fall in cost far more than expected to be practical. Goldman Sachs analysts don’t see costs falling by more than a factor of 2 for the foreseeable future.

https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/electric-veh...
Rocket Launcher Disguised as Fuel Truck Seen Firing in Iraq
https://archive.ph/E0p0G
Lose lost its o.
What specific test do I take to know my percentile?
What was the follow up content that's no longer available?
The electronic ones are, generally, fine.

The in-between generation of wound metal that changes how it bends based on temperature, those were too fiddly and prone to losing calibration.
whats funny or interesting about that? I missed several crucial details about two different country’s automated systems that wont be the same either way
Waiting for an RTO supporter to argue the opposite.
The movie satirically pokes fun at this sort of system. The book takes it seriously.
A VC Commentary on American Dynamism
Even worse: they’re security non-theater designed to protect “the computing environment” from you, the user.
Yes - thanks. Submitted title was just "The Secret of Nim", which HN's software shortened to just "Nim"
The first time I experienced that was on the Shinkansen.

It was pretty wild.
I should also add that the default provisioning for newer generation TPUs is ZERO, despite it not saying this anywhere on the sales pages. We had to dig deep to find this out.

How do you get access? Not by talking to anyone at Google, but by filling out a Google Form. Yes, a Google Form.

I spent many hours talking to everyone from support to executives at GCP. This is not an exaggeration. They all told me to fill out "the form." They said it "usually goes pretty fast." They don't even know the people or the department who approves it.

It took us months to get provisioned. By that time my company completely lost interest as we cannot move that slow in the most competitive space in technological history.

Also one last thing, we never even got notified once we were provisioned! There's no response to your form, you just have to keep checking.

Just absolutely wild amateur stuff.
They aren't simplifying templates so much as moving them to a language better suited for the complexity. There are some similarly complex Lua modules that have rats' nests of dependencies and piles of undocumented code.

Templates like {{Convert}} are also by and large unrelated to Wikifunctions, which are initially and primarily more concerned about lower-language natural language generation problems, like cross-language conjugation, that are relevant to Abstract Wikipedia.

Or, in the Google.org evaluation I mention in a sibling: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Google.or...

> Instead of attempting to invent so much from scratch, Wikifunctions could have been based on Scribunto. We think this is a huge missed opportunity. One of the longest-standing requests from the Wikimedia community has been to provide a means of reusing code across different projects by centralizing common code on a global wiki. This is a tractable, well-scoped problem (at least in comparison with Wikifunctions as currently conceived).

> “V1” of Wikifunctions could have been a new, central wiki for common Lua code. Structuring the development plan for Wikifunctions in this way would have meant a much shorter, surer path to delivering value to Wikimedians. It would have satisfied a long-standing community request, and (we suspect) earned the team quite a lot of goodwill. The team could then innovate on top of this initial version by building new graphical interfaces for producing and interacting with code, and by extending the capabilities of querying Wikidata.

> We are not sure why this was overlooked, particularly in light of the project requirements described above. In conversations with the Abstract Wikipedia team, team members suggested to us that this option was considered and rejected because Scribunto is an expert system and that Lua is based on English, and that these properties made it incompatible with the Wikifunction goal of broad accessibility. We think this is a bad argument, for the following reasons:

> - Lua has been successfully adopted by many projects whose primary language (as in, the language spoken by the users and developers) is not English. It is used successfully in hundreds of different language editions of Wikipedia.

> - Wikifunctions can provide localized, graphical user interfaces that generate Lua code behind the scenes (see Blockly, for example). Lua can also be used as a “transpilation” target for text-based programming languages (there is precedent for this on Wikimedia wikis). As an intermediate representation, Lua would be far more efficient and robust than an ad-hoc function composition language.

Which are all great points explicitly disregarded by Abstract Wikipedia for Wikifunctions.
The point on unannounced region launches seems to imply that Q is leaking information, but is there any evidence that this isn't just hallucinating?
One data point: I've been to couples therapy quite a few years ago and we've been getting better and better ever since.

From my experience a priest would go into that discussion with the goal of keeping the couple together, while the therapist would want ( a good one ) the best for them, whatever that may be. If your goal is to stay together with someone don't go to a therapist.
I remember when I used to do laptop repairs in college (we were a certified Apple repair center), Apple had a great training on all the different types of internal connectors, how you should handle them, etc. Some of them are really, really fragile.
Weird, never seen this complained of in the context of purchasing a software license, which I assume is something the HN crowd is familiar with.

It's not "weasel wording" it's the accurate term. It can also be true that the media companies can make it more clear that what is being purchased is a license which is subject to terms.
Healthcare is a highly specialized and restrictive career due to the education requirements. As 90% of the population utilizes their nationalized healthcare, the cost of healthcare on the government will only increase as they age, meaning that cuts or new revenue streams to support it will need to be used.

Since many use nationalized healthcare, the wealth of the older generation does not move to the younger generation by paying for these services. There will not be a migration of wealth like you believe.
Microsoft recently rebranded their chatbot offering to Copilot Studio. Copilot is also the name of Microsoft's AI products.

It's hard enough keeping all of Microsoft's products with similar names straight. I don't want to confuse other products with them, too, unless, maybe, this is the point :)
You have to shift your thinking to realize that their problem isn't with words or even knowledge itself; but with protecting their power or ideology.

In short, fanatics and power mongers are always going to fanatic and power monger.
What's "a lot of this argument"?

I would summarize it as "Apple/Google/Microsoft have made a labyrinthine mess of their products (I would agree), seek to use AI to make it less messy (probably also true)".

We all have differing needs, but we all have common needs too. Feature explosion is real, but the solution (organization) is something we've been doing for centuries without "modern" technology. Call it technical debt, laziness, corporate shortsightedness, or what you will, this is something the tech companies have done to themselves, and now are making worse under the guise of "innovation".
My mistake, you're correct, fungi are much older than plants. Stupid of me to offer a correction without even a cursory search to confirm what I thought I knew.
I think you misunderstood my point. I'm not saying that the advice therapists give is bad! Or even that it's not complex.

The rehab is actually a good example. If someone has an alcohol problem there are a hundred different really intrusive interventions you are going to have to do completely outside of what a therapist alone is going to be able to accomplish.
You are right, so the fact that people without immigrant parents or immigrant themselves are underachieving is a problem.

Would I still get downvoted if I said black americans are under represented instead of european?

Nigerians are the most educated immigrant group for example, tons of Nigerian doctors but why are they missing in tech?

You all really just want the appearance of inclusion so you can check boxes! Downvote away lol