skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fallout. But you know, war never changes.
Incredible work.

So much depth; initially I thought it's "just" a 3d model. The animations are amazing.
For-profit LLCs' purpose by law is to make profit for its shareholders. In common law systems it may be to pinpoint to a specific law, but from judgements its clear[1]. In e.g. Finland it's plain and clear in the law too.

Take time to smell the bullshit.

[1] https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com/2012/04/our-continuing-s...
Jetbrains products are outstanding
https://www.lynx.com/press-releases/lynx-mosa.ictm-selected-...
Well if it is through Booking.com message system it’s their problem not yours. The card would promptly get you a chargeback if they charged you
What? This is the dumbest thing I have read on HN in a while.

Do you want me really to write down some books were you should not be relaxed?
Google fiber and ATT both give out 2 WAPs in my area which will auto-mesh.
Watsonx: IBM's code assistant for turning COBOL into Java
My thoughts are there it's not a popular idea, politically. In a lot of countries, getting money "for free" is seen badly by the people who are "working their asses off for barely surviving", and politics push more the idea that "non working people are costly" and instead "we should find a way to make them work" and UBI is seen as something that would make people "lazy".
He does, it's literally what the Gates Foundation is for. It isn't easy to just give away $100,000,000,000 and trust that even half of that will get meaningfully spend and that it won't actually wind up getting abused by assholes in powerful positions and making things worse. That's $14 million per day for twenty years.
I would not recommend Hasura if you're on PostgreSQL.
Summary: On Mental Toughness by Harvard Business Review
Needs a (2019)

Richard was my manager in early 2019, and was awesome.
Jenkins has improve a bot. before github action has self host runner, Jenkins has worker node years ago.

using jenkins declarative pipeline, almost everything can explain in code.

updating jenkins is a walk in the past.

the most tedious part is dealing with no longer maitenance or support plugin.

make sure to never expose jenkins out. use a relayer to bring webhook traffic in
I’m pretty sure we all (or most of us) agree that the US bossing around the Solomon Islands is a bad thing, right? But since we don’t own Solomon Islands, they can go right ahead and do it anyway. And think we’re also all of us in agreement that it would not give the US license to invade. This all seems really obvious and not requiring any debate. Am I wrong about that? Do you feel a US invasion would be justified at that point?
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/2/19/21112570/univer...

Exactly what qualifies for you may mean it does already exist on a large scale or doesn't.

Alaska's UBI program gave 1.3k this year, which I'm guessing many commenters here would say is too small to be a real UBI, but it is universal and has been going for almost 50 years
I wonder how long this will last. Once their copyright expires in a few decades, anyone can be KISS, either digitally or in real life. (E.g. No one had to ask Napoleon’s estate for permission to portray him in the recent movie.)
I think this is valuable, but at least for Google and Netflix they were extremely straightforward about their interview process and were even happy to give tips on how to prep.
I don't know why both MS and Linux don't have a tool like IBM's AIX SMIT GUI that generates a CLI/shell command from a menu based dialogue. This was a great tool for those seldom used admin things you needed to do.
Do you feel this way when people mention Elon any time Tesla is discussed?
Also these things existed prior to WWI so by 1940 they were several iterations in.
I do like it. I have run my old ARCAM AVR from the optical out on my TV for nearly a decade. I can use the TV's media player, or use the TV as a second screen / audio device for my desktop.

In the latter case, Voicemeeter makes it possible to fill the house with near-perfectly synchronised sound.

In the former, I can throw and control files from my mobile, using Bubbleupnp.

Both good. But there is a big part of me that wants the amp to work on its own. Smart is most definitely not always the answer. Being unable to fiddle with a thing from your main devices can be a big QOL win. And frankly, one afternoon screaming at an Echo Dot was enough. Invasive, demanding, awkward, restrictive.

I feel that in many cases the big wins from modern tech came over a decade ago for me.

I've dropped my interest in most smart / streaming devices - too much choice, too much distraction and advertising. Smart lightbulbs, I will make an exception for - far easier than fitting old style dimmers.
In a certain way every country with taxes and good welfare system has an UBI, the difference is more of an implementation detail.
Complaining about all these is legit, I'd rather do it and get fired for "underperforming" than push through this shit and burn out. These sound like excuses but could be real issues that should be investigated because maybe it's rotten infrastructure that nobody cared about because it's "unproductive". Other devs can be affected too, apart from the person raising it because they lowered their expectations over time and can handle the suffering for the time being, while waiting second hour for CI to pass
I have the same basic setup and it’s been so refreshing having a network that just works.

I was an old AirPort Express user and after trying other WiFi setups like netgear, etc this has been night and day. And moving was a breeze, unplug, get internet service, and plug in
Looks like we killed it. I clicked apple and got "Application error: a server-side exception has occurred (see the server logs for more information).
Digest: 2825624865"
> TeamCity Professional is free – even for commercial use – and has no limitations on features, number of users, or build time.

Yeah, no. There's obviously gonna be a catch in the future.
I think that this proves that dividing by zero produces the set of all numbers, which is what it looks like to me when you graph this problem (y=1/x) using increasingly small positive and negative values for x. Smaller positive x values tend to positive infinity, smaller negative x values tend to negative infinity. When the x value reaches zero you have a vertical line from positive to negative infinity. ie dividing by zero corresponds to all numbers. That's how it appears to me. So 0/0=2 and it equals 3 etc. I admit this doesn't seem that useful.
apologies, my memory must have gotten mixed up.

point stands, as both deliver a subpar experience with either dm's or groups
"refuses to change". Is there an active team working on it or is this anthropomorphism of a software project?
S2n-TLS – A C99 implementation of the TLS/SSL protocol
It’s cost. Multiply population by the amount and you get a huge number. The math only works if you get rid of a lot of others social programs with vested interests.
It already does exist in some places in the form of sovereign wealth funds, such as the Alaska Permanent Fund [1].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Permanent_Fund
HN redirects to this post when I repost it, seems they check the URL. I'll keep it in mind in the future.
Conflicts of interest happen all the time. You recuse yourself from voting or decisions where applicable. Someone on the board of OpenAI is literally leading a direct competitor.
Keep a copy of the APK and block automatic updates. Don't support anything that doesn't work without phoning home. That's what I'd do in today's economy.
I had a gig (circa 2014) where Jenkins was used in atrocious ways where it was basically running the show. Yet there were no problems with Jenkins itself, it was running smoothly
If different microservices running different versions of their dependencies and being developed in different repos are seen as problems, what would you say the advantages of microservices are, since you say that "microservices are great"?

I though the point of microservices was mainly that they could be developed and deployed completely independently (in different repos, by different teams, in different languages, with different dependencies).

(Also you can scale them independently, I guess, but you can often do that just by changing the config of your database or app server.)
> there are killings related to cocaine traffic in Europe

Which is a problem created by the stupid “war on drugs”. If you make it impossible for parties to access the legal system to resolve any disputes, you’re forcing them to resolve them via extrajudicial means.

You don’t generally hear about killings within the traffic of any other commodity such as vegetables or IT goods. In fact we don’t even call it “traffic” but just trade.
All of the test runners have their issues. I've had as much problems with Jenkins as I've had with Github Runners and similar solutions.

The best way out of this is to subdivide responsibilities:

- Put all build/publish/test logic in Makefiles or scripts in the repo. This means that devs can run it locally as well. The only interaction between a test runner and the codebase should be running `make <target>`.

- Put all permissions and code checkout and artifact publishing credentials in the test runner, but no logic. At most you would put processing of test output like making junit/coverage/tap more web-readable.

That's it. Split the efforts cleanly, and things fall into place. Also, you can switch runners easily - less needs to be reimplemented in whatever runner config DSL is picked.
"feigning innocence and surprise" is quite unfair in both cases. E.g. Szilard invented the nuclear chain reaction, pushed his colleagues to avoid open research, and then when an arms race was apparently at the point of starting, wrote that letter to the U.S. president to start the Manhattan project; and tried to influence how it was used and governed. This is maybe not such a close analogy to people like Yudkowsky, but it's surprisingly close as history goes.
Selling an abstract product like insurance to consumers
Agreed on most of those points. The self checkout is decent but I've had to get help and they've made a mess of it before. There were items that I didn't have that appeared on the screen. They cleared the whole cart and made me scan everything again. This resulted in an extra 20 minute wait for the bus because I didn't get outside in time.

That being said the above complaint is pretty modest and so are all of the other ones I have (their cans never stack well at home) They deliver acceptable quality for a good price.
An apartment building probably saves on cost by using one transformer for the whole building, meanwhile detached houses usually each have their own transformer to step down from the local distribution lines. I'd imagine the signals have a hard time getting through a transformer.
> Warning – I’m going to rant for many, many paragraphs. My advice is to skim

I had a good chuckle at this.
>...expand their cultural horizons and lift their tastes.

Their tastes prior, being (considered) lower?
Monetary supply is finite for all who aren't members of the ruling class.
Really like the one line dissmissal of gitlab ci - haha, what a n00b.
HTML, the Programming Language
> Proper math consists solely of tautologies; statements that are always true. Using math is when you make use of these tautologies.

You forgot about axioms and definitions. If all you have is tautologies, you can never get to the point that 1+1 is 2, because 1 won't have a meaning.

But by the time you're defining objects and their behavior, you've already lost the hypothetical distinction between "proper math" and "using math". There is no such distinction.
Just curious, have you tried a more uncommon paragraph? Could it be the case that the model simply learned the poem due to it being in the training set?
Reinforcement Learning Explained
I don't see That Smell by Lynyrd Skynyrd.
There's a huge difference between typical welfare programs and UBI, in that the fundamental principle of the latter is just handing over money with no strins attached and trusting people to (on average) use it efficiently and effectively.
I always figured UBI would basically replace and end all government poverty programs at least
I haven’t had covid, as far as I know. Of course I saw the recommendations to get the vaccine, but I didn’t see any smearing or slandering or conning, I don’t know what you’re referring to. The company I work for did allow vaccinated people to return to work before unvaccinated people, and to me that seemed like a prudent choice at the time, but the vaccine requirement was dropped at my work a long time ago. I’m sorry that your choice had unfairly negative consequences for you, especially if you felt bullied.

Please keep in mind that it doesn’t really matter if a lot of vaccinated people still got covid later. That was expected, because the ‘vaccine’ was not a covid cure. If the spread was slowed and the symptoms were reduced significantly, then the vaccine was successful. There has been lots of science on the unvaccinated, and it found that they died and were hospitalized from covid at much higher rates than vaccinated people. I believe there is plenty of science still happening on the secondary effects of the vaccine, so being unaware of it doesn’t mean it’s not happening. I’m not aware of “harm to many people” who took the vaccine. What harm are you referring to, and how many people were harmed, exactly? Did that harm happen less often or more often than to people who got covid? Just like with tinnitus, you can’t take anecdotes out of context when it happens to someone vaccinated if you don’t compare it to people who weren’t vaccinated.

BTW, while the covid vaccine was an untested vaccine at first (like all vaccines before trials), it did go through trials and it was not untested technology. mRNA therapies had been used in other non-covid trials for a decade, and tested against other infectious diseases for several years before the covid vaccine was developed. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7956899/

Think about it: at this point, we have more data on the effects of the covid vaccine than almost any other vaccine or drug in all of human history. Concerns about it being untested did maybe make sense in March of 2020, but it has now been thoroughly tested and so those concerns don’t make that much sense to hold on to anymore, right?

So I take it you weren’t very interested in talking about tinnitus?
If you purely use IQ as a metric, the. Yes we are smarter than 100 or 50 years ago. However this has stagnated/reversed in the last decade.
The commments relevant to the latest situation can be found starting with comment #10:

https://community.openai.com/t/high-cpu-web-workers-usage-of...

Reddit thread:
https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/189qpsz/if_your_cp...
Well, SOSUS had cables that people knew fed into landing stations on the coast but what exactly they were for remained classified until like the 1980s. So those are literally classified government cables. If you mean secret Internet cables, I have no clue, but hey, history teacher had a history answer so… hi. :)
Meat is extremely nutritious. And isn't 7000 L of water but of virtual water. This concept is meaningless as it is for decision making. It's way more complex than that.
> the only thing removing category distinctions here will do for you is give license to treat any organism however you wish

This is only true if what stops you from treating certain organisms in a certain way are these objective category distinctions (rather than the approximate ones your brain makes), but I don't think that's generally how it works. People who wish to harm others will harm others regardless, the only thing that will stop them is consequences. On the other hand, people who don't wish harm to others will not harm others regardless of whether they believe objective categories or objective morality exists.
US warship and multiple commercial ships attacked in the Red Sea
> “everybody should be writing and maintaining their own CI jobs”

And, of course, everybody should be using whatever language and version they want to, and run their software on whatever cloud they want. The notion of this makes me super uneasy, but at the same time it's a good explanation why many big orgs have 100s of engineers when they can probably easily do with 10s of them.
Not quite the same thing. The old shell would stop reading at `\n`, whereas buffered input means the process has an arbitrary buffer of bytes read ahead.

Modifying the file while it's executing would cause issues in either scenario, so long as any part of the file was unbuffered. I think you're interpreting buffering to mean "buffer the entire file" which isn't what happens here.
The closest thing we had to it - welfare and unemployment benefits without work requirements or onerous means testing - were dismantled on the basis of shoddy (read: nonexistent) research and amidst an atmosphere of racism and classism, and with the current status quo perpetuated by the perverse incentives of public-private "work search support" contracts. Any analysis of resistance to the implementation of UBI should consider this history. Some reporting on the matter:

https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/magic-bureaucrat-rive...

https://revealnews.org/podcast/the-welfare-to-work-industria...

https://www.cbpp.org/research/test-work-requirements-dont-cu...

We've known for a while now that the best approach is to just give people the money needed for them to improve their circumstances (whether that be capital for business or funding for training or other support services like therapy or housing).

EDIT: And a tangential link of some special interest: https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2013/12/20/255819681...
Then quite obviously the value of that money would be reduced in a significant way, as it no longer represents goods or labor to the same degree.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToQoJ1Bbpus&t=1165s
Jenkins is not perfect by any means, but I can say it is much better than existing solutions (taking pros and cons after trying and using many of them). Sure, it doesn't have fancy UI or flying buttons, nor is it rust/PWA/react/whatever-rage-is-these-days, but it does its job - it works, is free, and has been very well-maintained for ages. Download a single file and run it. Want to extend it? There is a plugin for everything under the sun (but be careful, you can easily bloat it).

IMHO, I don't want bells and whistles from the CI tool. CI tools are dry; I see them as a car drive shaft - it must work properly, and I don't expect it to be pretty. If you need to showcase it, you are probably doing something wrong.

And one more thing: I expect Jenkins to be around and free in the next 10 years. I doubt that will be the case for "insert-your-favorite-ci-from-some-company".
Indeed. And the current generation of error messages is much improved, so clearly it was possible to do better.
Same here. Although I am super nervous that they will either cash out by going public or selling to some investor. That will be the end of it.
What's weird is that the Clang binary is clearly compiled for an instruction set that is compatible with the Pi B+, but it doesn't target an instruction set that is compatible with the Pi B+. This is genuinely weird, since that's not meant to be a cross-compiler; in theory, the host and the target should be the same.

Presumably the image is Raspbian. I don't see a reason why not to assume that.
I'm open to being corrected, but I feel that your statement is missing the point. An embedding can trivially have char embedding that sum to word embeddings, or it can have word embeddings that well represent semantic concepts, but it's not at all trivial to preserve both constraints simultaneously like you make it out to be.
The constraints of adding a letter to a word won't consistently shift it in one direction that will also capture the semantic meaning of that vector shift.

Or to give a more concrete example "despair", "aspired", "daipers", and "praised" are all anagrams. If summing the embeddings of characters produces words, then the embedding of all 4 of those words must be identical. That significantly constrains semantic differentiation between those 4 very different words.

What's going on is more complex than what you've stated - and put simply, if reserving single characters embeddings was all that was needed to produce this result then all the llms would produce these results successfully. They don't - and that demonstrate that those two models are more "powerful"/"adept" than the others.
I get your point of view, but I believe in a multipolar world where no single country can set the rules unilaterally.

China has shown us that you can modernize a country and make it a global actor without imposing yourself as a hegemon, and I choose that as a role model.
Zigbee with its meshing is extremely reliable in pretty much all home setups I could think of. It works quite a lot better than Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. Therefore I am not sure it is actually needed to have a separate physical protocol which can only be accessed by smart sockets (and maybe also smart bulbs, though I'd think you need to have all of those on the same power phase first).

It would work better in, I don't know, warehouses? Where the distance to the next device becomes too large.
I don't know much about UBI. How do people generally see it being implemented?

Does everyone get the exact same, flat amount? Do only people below a certain income get it? Does the amount gradually decline based on current income? Does the amount change based on cost of living? If someone remains destitute after being given UBI - is that now more clearly "on them," or do they now qualify for additional support?

Genuinely curious. It seems like these questions are very challenging to answer in a way that feels good/fair to all involved.

(edit, follow up questions:)

- If everyone gets the same amount then how would we reach alignment on fair amount if COL in different areas is wildly different? The gap between highest/lowest rent in America is 4x - 800 vs 3200. Said differently, is there a goal outcome with UBI or is the goal to just give out some money? Are we trying to make sure just everyone's rent is covered, rent and food, or just easing the pain a little?

- If we give everyone money every month, and that money immediately goes into circulation, doesn't that just cause inflation and then we're right back to where we started?
Lowstorage: JSON-based database for Cloudflare Workers and R2 buckets
Living near a 5G antenna may be quite different than being next to a wifi router though, the power/amplitude are quite different
The devs also think that they’re gonna get to relicense the code.

What a bunch of idiots.
By all means, you should have the right to control your lifespan. Please let others make that choice too, insofar as the universe will allow us.
AI will need to get much better, unfortunately, for that to happen. And AI will trigger even more minimalism in the short run.

This is because minimalism encourages extremely precise, exact abstracted designs where a single pixel being wrong is visible. While generative AI always has, and will indefinitely, be best at a profusion of exuberant detail where errors or repetition are concealed by the density. You can generate great photographic images or montages right now with MJ or DALL-E 3, but you will struggle to get anything which is a crisp sharp vector. Even vector-generating services like Recraft.ai aren't that good. (Note also how long it took generative AI to be able to do pixel art. We were trivially generating photorealistic faces while pixel art GANs weren't working at all.)

So, as a reaction to generative AI, designers & fashion will flee to minimalism in order to not look 'cheap'.

The vector art & typography will be a proof-of-work that a human made it and a costly signal of 'quality'. While anything photographic or painting-like, especially if presented as a single large raster image, will increasingly feel untrustworthy, cheap, and mass-produced.