skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I am however confused why you think the law being applied to the company having 91% of search in Canada is mission creep, you never actually say why claiming that Google has a "a significant bargaining power imbalance" is "loosely" interpreting the criteria....

I think you misunderstood my point.

I'm not talking about applying the law to Google, specifically. I'm not even saying that the government & regulators are "loosely interpreting the law." I'm saying that the criteria, as set out in Section 6 is itself intentionally loose to the point where it gives broad, sweeping and arguably arbitrary power to the regulators in order to decide who qualifies and why. That, if challenged in court, they only have to argue that a "significant bargaining power imbalance" exists because of some degree of consideration to "size" of the target, "prominent market position" and "strategic advantage." If that's not extremely broad and sweeping, I don't know what is.

Personally, I don't want my government and it's regulatory agencies having that type of unconstrained broad discretion. It allows them to:

- selectively target certain entities over others

- while in doing so, has the potential to create an unfair market environment while claiming that their goals are to achieve fairness

- it gives them a very broad paintbrush with which to select these entities

In your follow-up point about legal cases and years and cost of going through the court system .. if any target of this law wanted to challenge being targeted by the CRTC ... that's the exact type of lengthy and costly legal process that they would have to go through in suing the CRTC for exemption. It would be incredibly costly for the entity targeted, while having virtually zero consequences for the CRTC and the government if the courts were to rule in the entity's favour.

Just imagine how open to corruption this law is. The CRTC can "punish" certain entities while giving "favours" to others by choosing to leave them be and not target them.
There is a lot of in the office abuse too. Time shooting the shit with colleagues, popping out for a coffee or just goofing off in front of a desk. Probably half the comments on this very website were probably written by someone who was being paid to work.

Now when I'm working from home and not feeling productive I have options. Go for a lie down if I'm tired. Get ready and go for a run if I'm frustrated. Go downstairs and have a cuddle with my 1 year old etc.
The problem with hybrid teams are that there tends to be in-person communication happening in the in-office teams which the remote employees aren't brought up to speed on. That creates alienation and preferential treatment. And the latter is important since it isn't a blinded scientific experiment and the manager gets to pick and choose how to interact with the two different teams, which is going to shift the outcomes. If the manager was remote-only with 8 remote employees they'd have to adapt to 100% remote work and the bias would likely evaporate.
I am imagining some integrated battery I guess.
maybe it’s a C thing where (without header definitions) you have to put main at bottom and anything it needs above it (same for functions that reference other functions/structs that aren’t main) to make the compiler happy?
Maybe. But 500 is a large number of companies. And those same companies have a fair number of employees who have been there for a decade or more. I'm not sure I believe that large profitable public companies aren't in the top 500 companies in tech in compensation overall.
> So user's are at fault for trusting a filesystem that advertises itself as being reliable?

Yes, absolutely 100% at fault. There are many failure modes here beyond corruption: human error, electrical surges, flooding, fire. Hell, somebody could break into your house and steal the NAS!

Filesystem bugs aren't a big deal. If they are a big deal to you, it's because you're trusting a system with a single point of failure, and the consequences of that inevitable failure are not acceptable to you. Stop doing that.

If I could choose between introducing a random filesystem bug and a random wifi driver bug into the kernel on my laptop, I'd take the filesystem bug every day of the week and twice on Sunday. Reinstalling my laptop is at worst a minor inconvenience that takes me an hour, and I can always use a different filesystem until the bug is fixed.
I see dead comments
Thank you for introducing me to the world eye, this will be the 5th discontinued japanese electronic doodad i've bought off ebay due to FOMO.
> It literally gets just sent to the place in the clear.

Nowadays they send a virtual card that has been generated by booking.com to the hotel. The card details of the guest stay with booking.com
Location: New York City
Remote: Remote/Hybrid/Onsite
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Python (Django, Flask), Rails, Javascript(React, Redux, Vue), Cloud (AWS)
Resume/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y0ru2aUY4YaGTSDK8Iif8oXwr-1o4Elm/view
Email: akvashi24@gmail.com

I'm a full-stack engineer, 4 years of experience, mostly at early-stage startups (pre-seed, seed, Series A). I'm comfortable with the startup way of working - context switching, ambiguous tasks, communicating technical challenges/opportunities to non-technical folks.

Tech I've worked with: Python (Flask, Django), Javascript (React, Redux, Vue), Ruby on Rails, Cloud (AWS, Heroku)

Tech I really love: Vercel, Tailwind, Figma, Arc Browser
These numbers are wildly inaccurate. I spotchecked multiple places that I know the salaries and they're wrong.
Do you have any good resources for chain-of-thought prompting experiments?
Feel free to show statistics.

Here's one that shows that Sweden has indeed been more entrepreneurial then the US (2019), see sources at the bottom: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/how-sweden-became-more-entrep...
Every institution is exploited to some degree.

What do you mean by many? As an institution, I sincerely doubt that science is exploited to a similar degree as basically any others.

I don’t really accept these ridiculous trumpisms. “Many people are saying”.

How many people are *doing*? I’ll wager it’s far and away a major minority.

Can you back up your “many” with actual numbers as a percentage of investment?
> Housing and land in particular are really tough.

Housing and land are not "tough". There's plenty of dirt cheap land even in highly developed countries; it just happens to be outside the most popular locations. But if we want housing to become both cheap and livable we must invest in those "unpopular" places, even as we also try to build more housing in the more high-demand locations. There's just no avoiding that.
Checklists are the big one. We've got a big spreadsheet of general areas that people should know, each with a lecture attached, but those are for self-study; I go over each one in detail with each new hire in a series of sessions typically lasting ~3 months, at 2-3 sessions per week.

Separately, I hold what amounts to office hours 3 times per week, where anyone who feels like it can show up to ask questions—but new hires are encouraged to do so until absolutely certain they don't need to, and also to keep track of questions between sessions.

There's more, but this is the part that's easy to explain.

What didn't work... crucially, waiting for newbies to ask questions doesn't work; they won't. You need to actively go looking, and also bring up areas they might not even know they ought to ask about.
That's ok, you misused the word 'word' to apply to 'finite' and 'state' :-P.
Good luck with that in USA.

I'd rather die some billionaires minimum wage security squad protecting his gold plated yacht than let some violent freeloaders take my shit and install some cuban-tier communist hell-hole where there's no incentive to produce even basic grain stocks.
I wonder if there's some way to stream the GPT-4 response into the text to speech api and then stream that voice to the user. I don't think OpenAI's TTS API allows this, but if there were some API that could do this (or self-hosted model), you could give the appearance of being faster.
I mean, she wasn't just poor, she was a poor black woman in America. She certainly seems genuine even with all the money, but I still have a tough time giving her a free pass - she can afford to pay whatever the pass costs.
I don't get the amount of effort people out into the replacement-strategy, I did perfectly fine without it and the code is about as complex as the examples I've seen.

https://github.com/codr7/swift-interpreter/blob/main/part10/...
That's why commercialization is a better metric than replication. If nobody is willing to pay for it, why should my taxes fill the gap?
I like this model too, except it should function (maybe pro-rated?) at lower number of hours/week--not everyone should work "full-time"--and also include volunteering. Maybe also other unpaid labor like child-rearing and open source software development.
It might be for the compiler, but the nesting implies hierarchy for the reader, which may or may not be desirable.
I did that!
from my check, this doc seems to be showing the base comp (cash $$) for many positions. not all, but many.
You missed the forest:

>> A circle can be rotated in place. It doesn’t take more space than the initial circle. *A square cannot.*

Edit: and just in case you or someone else miss the forest again:

the site developer treats the image as a circle, assuming rotating the image would change only the image.
I get that some people don’t want to participate in the competition, but how is that a reason to take the feature away from others who enjoy the competition?
It's rare for an academic to make over $1M in salary, but mid-high six figures is not uncommon for a highly published, well known name with a track record of winning large grants.
Businesses don’t really exist? That's like saying feelings don't exist: they're just constructs that we come up with to explain our reactions to situations. I suppose that's true to a degree, but something doesn't need to be made of atoms to be "real".

Businesses exist in as much as they are the primary determinant of most people's lives. They shape our cities, our media, laws, politics, foreign policy and have a huge impact in just about everything else that matters. Real or not, it has _real_ impacts all around us.

Outside of OSS, I think it's pretty clear that the entity that's footing the bill gets to make the call on how things get made. Even if that's: bad for said entity, bad for the user, bad for the public generally, the environment, etc. (of course, there's industry and governmental regulations, but by and large the company calls the shots).
Etymology is interesting stuff for sure, but I'm pretty sure that "Islamophobia" is a well-established term: it was first included in the OED in 1923.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_the_Author

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DeathOfTheAuthor
You need a ‘tutorial’-style guide to bootstrap your knowledge. After that, you’re ready to use a technical reference.

Some programming languages ship a good tutorial as part of their documentation (e.g. Python), but not all.
The “YAGNI” principle is something I’ve had to learn the hard way - and continue to learn it, just earlier this week, in fact. YAGNI and DRY are sometimes in vicious opposition. A pro tip I picked up from Gary Bernhardt’s Destroy All Software screencasts is to leave some DRYing (or other refactoring for readability/maintenance purposes) until after you write tests and are in a red-green-refactor cycle. You can always DRY your code later, especially now that IDEs make it so easy to extract methods for you with automatic population of required variables/parameters.
Interesting - I can't speak to the Huggingface endpoint. I downloaded the 4-bit GGUF model locally and ran it through Oobabooga with instruct-chat template - I expressed my questions in English.
I'm talking about the period from 2006 to 2008 or so. source: that's when I met Tobi and a few other early people.
I'm another long time hackernews reader and banjo player. Back in the days when we used to work in data centers, I was pulling a long late night for some server maintenance with my banjo and I heard the night security guard come in on his routine patrol. I played a bit of dueling banjos (from behind a rack). He spun on his heels and got out of there. He didn't come back through again that night.
people have fewer children today, that concentrates any inheritance, including among people of modest means. depending on the statistics analyzed, people of modest net worth with one child could contribute to an overall upward skew.
Location: Gary, IN
Remote: Remote (would consider hybrid in/around Chicago-land)
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Anything open source, mainly: Node.js, Laravel, Vue.js, Alpine, Nuxt.js, AWS (S3, SES, EC2, LB, RDS, ECS, etc), Serverless (Lambda), CI/CD, High Availability, Vite/PostCSS/Babel/Webpack/Transpiling, Pest/PHPUnit/Cypress/Mocha/Jest, Bash, Docker, etc.
Résumé/CV: https://kingsley.sh/kingsley-raspe-full-stack-developer-resume.pdf
Email: hello@kingsley.sh

Hi - I'm Kingsley, a full stack web developer and DevOps engineer with 11+ years experience, specialising in a broad range of open-source tech, including Node.js/Express.js, PHP8/Laravel 10, JavaScript/Vue.js, SCSS, Vite/Webpack, CI/CD, and more. Passionate about writing highly available, clean, maintainable, and testable code. Originally from the UK, now residing in the beautiful lake-side city of Gary, Indiana. I like DIY, long walks on the beach, gardening/nature/greenery, and vintage roots reggae.
Several OpenAI employees have said on Twitter that they are looking into this and developing a fix. It sounds as though it was not an intentional regression since they are implicitly acknowledging it. Could be an unintentional side effect of something else.

I'd expect we see improved behavior in the coming weeks.
>Just wanted to say you’re a great employer to be so incredibly accommodating to the point you get them an Alienware

So gracious, to give a software developer some hardware to run the software they need to work, that costs a whopping nothing more than what other people in the industry get on the average.

>and let them roll an accessibility solution

"You're such a good employer! You let your employee build their own accessibility ramp to the back entrance in their own time, and even got them a mortar spatula to do so!"
We need more support for employees like this!

>We need more support for employees like this!

And less support for employers like this.
That possibility is explicitly made in the article
I fear looking like a trusting fool.
What do you mean? I see dell, disney, EA, oracle, walmart, all on that list. Like what companies are you thinking of?
Wholeheartedly agree. For the peasants, revolutionary goals are rarely fulfilled. For the previous elite though, they rarely find continuity of power post revolution.

The sans-culottes didn't quite accomplish their goals(at least immediately), but Louis XVI among other elites didn't survive.

Toussaint Louverture et al didn't accomplish their goals, but the French no longer controlled Haiti.

Even Lenin and Trosky didn't accomplish their goals, but the Romanov didn't leave the Ipatiev House alive.

Like many conflicts, one side doesn't have to win for one to lose.
> I was never sure nvidia would maintain over time.

PTX is maintained over time. Its a high-level assembly so to speak, the full details of the machine remain abstracted so that code can be more portable.

SASS is not. SASS changes from architecture-to-architecture. SASS is the actual machine code of NVidia cards. There's an overall understanding of SASS in the GPU world but its not really documented and you "shouldn't" want to learn about it.

--------

I should note that Intel's "pshufb" instruction is very similar to the permute instruction in NVidia/AMD. So yeah, there's a high-speed generic shuffle that's key to Intel/AMD AVX512 code.

But having the backwards-direction (bpermute) available too, as well as __shared__ memory for all other cases is great.
Show HN: Blocky – Fast and lightweight DNS proxy as ad-blocker for local network
Was very glad to have discovered (and seen live at the pub/venue down the street from where I was living!) during a semester in Ireland in the mid-90s. Never saw Shane/Pogues though.
To be fair, a lot of Muslim countries, Shiite or Sunni, do not care for the Uighur plight. Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. are all happy to take Chinese money.
As someone who maintains an automated formatter (Dart format), I agree that automated formatting raises the floor and lowers the ceiling. But my experience is that it raises the floor by a large amount and lowers the ceiling only a little. Most importantly, it reduces the engineering cost to reach the floor to zero.
I dont entirely understand what this is.

I think this is an effort to create a skin, or graphics layer / window layer to FreeBSD that looks and feels like Apple.

But then it says the project uses the Mach kernel.
Does that mean that they have a version of FreeBSD running on top of
the Mach kernel?
That sounds cool.

Are they creating a clone of Cocoa that will have the same interface
as the original? Or is Cocoa a open sourced from Apple?

Near the top it reads:

""RavynOS aims to be compatible with macOS applications""

Ok well that sounds cool.

Then farther down:

""Trivial macOS and Darwin applications may run directly on ravynO""

I guess it can be a goal that is a long way off still.
I dont know why they would bother with Linux compatibility.
FreeBSD and Mac has to be the most important ones?
If you are minimum wage security guard, nobody is taking your shit.
Cloudflare Gen 12 Server: Bigger, Better, Cooler in a 2U1N Form Factor
Also clubhouse. Is it still alive ?
Impressive work, really excited for this.

I will note though that I feel safer getting an occasional bad word than I do having a translator straight up deceive me.

For example, "what the fuck" in English->Spanish is giving "qué diablos" output. Definitely toning down the meaning there.

If someone says something mean to me, I want to know it.
Nuclear should not be in the same category as wind and solar. It's byproducts are the most toxic elements in the known universe, it's input fuels can be used as a cover for rogue nations to produce the most dangerous weapons in the world, and when things go wrong, failed reactors destroy communities and make them uninhabitable for hundreds of years. Solar and wind, including their input materials, do not even come close to that level of potential destruction in their worst case scenarios.

Making an a posteriori argument that nuclear is safer is just sticking your head in the sand to the potential harms. Fukushima was hardly over 10 years ago...
That's because it's just not true in any meaningful sense. What happens is that the wealth is often transformed and split between separating couples, but it mostly stays in the same class.

The idea that generational wealth is lost is a great story though. It's part of the "American Dream". Anyone can do it. The "self-made" man. Rags to riches. If you spend any real time with the wealthy people—almost anywhere in the US—you know this isn't true. It happens, sometimes, sure. What you DO see is plenty of "millionaires" who saved 50% of their income for 45 years and get to retire at 65 with >2 million in the bank. There are tons of these people. This is what the wealth planning industry creates and it's what skews the statistics about these sorts of things. Poor for a lifetime for a taste of wealth at the end.

But man, the idea that, "70% of generational wealth is gone by the 2nd generation" is literally a joke. I can imagine it as the punchline to a joke where management is trying to convince to labor to work harder.

It's so easy to be wealthy when you grow up with money. And it's easy to stay there as long as you don't fall into a serious addiction of some sort. And even when you lose a bit it's easy to get back because the connections you have basically guarantee you income. Being born into wealth is damn near a safety net that lasts a lifetime. If you can earn the respect of a just 5 or 6 people in wealthy families you never really have to worry about money. And truth is, once you know 2 or 3 you end up with a dozen contacts. Your next venture is a phone call away. There is always a job for "talented people". That's the reality that people really don't talk about because why would they. It just pisses anyone off who isn't at that level.

When I see people talk about how most generational wealth is lost by the second generation what I have to assume they are talking about is someone who inherited $2 million or so when their parents died. Not because their parents were wealthy, but because they spent their entire life relatively poor (despite having some assets), saving for a day that never came, and then died at 70. So their kids grew up relatively poor, and suddenly at 40 they have a few million that they quickly piss away. That's a scenario that happens all the time that people are familiar with. That's technically generational wealth. But when I think about generational wealth I think about families that own land, businesses, assets. Families that own city blocks.

Truth is, if you show up at the elite country club for the first time at 65 no one is going to consider you wealthy, especially if you don't have the stories. The real wealthy people have been there since they were 15. Wealthy people have a lifetime of wealthy people stories that they like to tell each other. Real generational wealth is its own society.
Depends on how many multis you're talking about. A billionaire who wants them can have a large yacht, private jet, multiple large homes, staff for everything. Someone with $10 million will be living an upper-middle-class lifestyle, but without needing to work. Maybe a second house or a boat or plane they pilot themselves, but no full-time staff. $100 million could start having the billionaire stuff but at a smaller scale.

Vast difference in political influence, too.
Worth noting that this isn’t a contradiction of the criticism of your use of it.
Have you visited other places in North America, or are you assuming everywhere is like Columbia?
I honestly wish more people would try to organize their files to be read top-to-bottom, it makes it much faster to grok something new.

But of course there are lots of other factors constraining the way a file can/should be ordered, depending on language
In some actions, yes, he wants to appear as successful multi millionaires. In some other actions, he sounds like a billionaire. That's why he is seen as a weird multi-millionaire. He is not cheap either, but doesn't trust anyone: he feeds you information, to see whether you share that with other people; he says, he trusts you, later he can send a private detective to see what you are up to.

I think, the root cause is this: just as FAANG engineers's social circle is fellow people working from FAANG, it is the same for wealthy, super, uber wealthy. You don't see a FAANG guy living in a mobile home surrounded by people who work in the blue collar folks.

Some folks don't want to involve in many social activities of the class they belong to, but want to be part of the lower classes. That's what I mean by 'pass themselves off as'.
click on app, command-c, shift-command-A, command-V

if you find yourself looking for faster routes to an end, MacOS almost always has several levels of shortcuts waiting for your muscle memory.
This looks interesting and i might give it a try, but after watching the talk i'm still a bit unclear why you choose for wasm-in-wasm for the reducer.

I suspect you would be better off by creating a rust reducer trait, and lifting that wasm-in-wasm complexity into a new crate implementing the reducer trait through wasm-in-wasm for the people who want that.

But maybe i'm missing something.