skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's my understanding, at least in the case of dashlane, that the master password never leaves the local device. It's not stored on the server anywhere, its not directly used as part of a log in. It is only used AFTER the encrypted blob has been downloaded to the device, to decrypt it.

https://www.dashlane.com/download/whitepaper-en.pdf
But so is Roundcube.

OT: please (re)read the HN Guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I work in pharma and most of the time when I visit labs, they don't run 24/7 and in fact run at about 10% or less of their total capacity.
One country still stands out. As for the following, I wonder why academia never built its own chain of trust a'la PGP:

"For another, using commercial email addresses as a feature to identify potential fake papers could lead to discrimination against honest scientists from developing countries. Furthermore, even in developed countries, there are good reasons for authors to use commercial rather than academic email addresses."
It wasn't just national prestige, it was a component of the arms race that defined all geopolitical relations in that era.
My parents had a dishwasher but always said it "didn't get the dishes clean" and used it as a drying rack instead.

I bought a house where the dishwasher was incorrectly installed causing odors to come through the sink. That led me down a rabbit hole of proper dishwasher installation, maintenance, loading and using rinse aid.

MY GOD! My parents were wasting their lives! My dishwasher cleans and dries two sinks worth with three minutes of effort!
> These are important reminders that pathological cynics always will find a way to complain

Even Hacker News is cited in the piece!
In order to really solve this, you couldn't use an LLM, at least not one in any shape that we have now.

You'd need something that actually understands the language. What is a lifetime, what is scope, what are types, functions, variables, etc. Something that can contextually look at correct, incomplete, or broken programs and reason about what they're doing by knowing the rules that the language operates on and following them to a conclusion. It would also need to understand high-level design patterns and structure to not just know what's happening in the literal sense "this variable is being incremented" but also in a more abstract sense "this variable keeps track of references because this is mixed C/Python code that needs that to handle deallocation". Something that recognizes patterns both within and outside of the code, with appropriately fuzzy matching where needed.

And I think importantly you'd need to be able to query it at a variety of levels. What's happening on a line-by-line basis and what's happening at the high level at a given point of code. One OR the other isn't sufficient.

That is not a simple ask. We're a long way away from something that smart existing.
40 Years On, Pac-Man Recreated with AI by Nvidia Researchers
I wonder if anyone has sued for damages resulting from frivolous DMCA takedown requests? Seems like there should be some consequences for filing these in bad faith
I really wanted one of these at first glance, but then I realized I'd have $60 sweater in my closet that might get used once or twice per year, so I passed.

They are neat though and I'm happy to see resources going into making official nostalgic items like this.
Danish researchers puncture 100-year-old theory of odd little 'water balloons'
Cristiano Ronaldo faces $1B lawsuit over Binance ads
Would BBC Basic need much more than something like a BIOS setup screen?
What application are you using SK for? I'm struggling to come up with good use-cases in my work.
Bayes in the Age of Intelligent Machines
Is this a common thing to do in some countries or is your city an outlier? I have never seen anything like it in my tiny part of the world.
Technically a resolute agent can handle a utility function that messed up, but I'm not sure if people in general would be able to self-commit well enough.
> I saw a concept once that had the plane drop the big battery after takeoff (maybe after reaching cruising altitude too) and let the battery fly back to the airport autonomously. Then it doesn't have to carry that dead weight for the entire trip.

This sounds unrealistic. What if the plane needs "big energy" in the sky for emergency failure? Isn't the standard in aviation failure to the level of the 3rd degree or something (1 signal has 2 backups for 3 total or something)
> I wouldn't be surprised to see together.ai becoming a top 3 player in this space.

I'd like some more detail on how they differ from the other 50 or so inference providers currently out there.

I always figured inference was something GCP/AWS would eventually get into their platforms
A recent episode of The Verge's podcast titled "Land of the Giants: "The Tesla Shock Wave" uncovered how Tesla's work culture led to many problems for the employees like extremely long hours, unsafe working conditions, harassment, scandals, fines, lawsuits, and even the slightest of mistake could lead to termination."

Source:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.livemint.com/companies/news...
Unless they used GPTinf
TL; DR I'm not arguing we do these things well. I'm just saying these are the components of justice.

> Not sure what the value of retribution is other than deterrance

It's irrational. But it seems fundamental to human nature. If you remove deterrence, victims and those who identify with them--which in the modern world is increasingly the public--take justice into their own hands.

The 1984 subway shooting acquittal is one example [1]. Goetz shot four people in cold blood. He was obviously guilty. But the jury acquitted, because he was seen as acting justly. (The four kids "allegedly tried to rob him," and there was a lot of unpunished robbery in New York at the time.) The reaction was in excess of self protection. But the public bought into the vengeance narrative because the criminal justice system wasn't doing it for them.

Another example was Chesa Boudin refusing to prosecute someone who unintentionally killed a kid. He said it wouldon't bring the child back. Which is true. But that infuriated the victim's family. They wanted revenge. (They got it through the recall. But most families don't have recourse to the political system to sort things out peacefully.)

> substantial number of inmates commit crimes while in prison

Not on the public. But yes, we fail at this.

> We need to find a better way

I agree. I'm describing tenets of justice. We fail to do justice in America--we do not deter, we do not incapacitate and we certainly don't rehabilitate. We're okay with restitution and retribution, though it's a statistical versus comprehensive approach.

That doesn't undermine the theory, however, which has persisted for millenia and across cultures for good reasons.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_New_York_City_Subway_shoo...
UI failings aside, a few points, mostly from the US Naval Institute's Proceedings[2] (which has references to the Official Investigation "Fogarty report"[3])

- it was standard practice to illuminate Iranian military aircraft with missile fire control radar as a warning for them to turn around. "When you put that radar on them, they went home. They were not interested in any missiles," Captain Carlson recalled.

- the captain of the Vincennes was known as trigger-happy and the Vincennes was nicknamed the Robo-Cruiser.

- the Vincennes was inside Iranian territorial waters at the time of the shoot-down

- data from USS Vincennes' tapes, information from USS Sides and reliable intelligence information corroborate the fact that TN 4131 was on a normal commercial air flight plan profile…squawking Mode III 6760, on a continuous ascent in altitude from take-off at Bandar Abbas to shoot down."

- "Capt. Rogers was a difficult student. He wasn’t interested in the expertise of the instructors and had the disconcerting habit of violating the Rules of Engagement in the wargames." [2]

- Commander Lustig, the air-warfare coordinator, even won the navy's Commendation Medal for "heroic achievement," his "ability to maintain his poise and confidence under fire," enabling him to "quickly and precisely complete the firing procedure.

- all hands aboard the Vincennes and the Elmer Montgomery received combat action ribbons."

...

[1] https://www.newsweek.com/sea-lies-200118

[2] https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1993/august/vince...

[3] https://archive.org/details/FormalInvestigationintotheCircum...
What are you, a communist? The free market will fix that, any day now!
> spacing is typically 3nm

For anyone else not that familiar with aviation and very confused, this means three nautical miles—about 3½ regular miles, not that it's smaller than a transistor fin.
I happen to agree with you. I was just speculating what could have been done.

I have had to make decisions under stress. If I had been in the captain’s chair, I absolutely would have fired.

A verified enemy plane diving towards my ship in an active war zone?

If I had been thinking at all, I’d be thinking about the British losing a ship in the Falklands just 6 years ago.
That settles it.
Just checked this out, I'll give it a shot for sure.
Ok so we're going with the interpretation, "showing dead bodies on TV is 'about empathy'"?

I was charitably trying not to interpret the comment this way, because the rest of the comment rants about how there is too much division. It seems absurd to me to suggest that showing dead bodies will unite people. In practice it seems to do exactly the opposite.
I don't think so. You're using two low load, low power systems combined. The least reliable ICE systems almost always correlate to the more powerful ones.
This game is great! Really fun and surprisingly challenging, today's challenge was in one of the parts of the world I'm most unsure about geographically!

Unlike the other wordle-like games, I feel like I'm actually learning something with this one!

Great work!
Any time we can get countries competing with each other on technology that doesn't directly involve blowing each other up, it is a good thing for the human race.
Ten million years? I hope in that time we evolve to have wings.
This is a really clean font. Nice work!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

> Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

This is what was actually said

--------

stop being dishonest.

But even if you weren't mischaracterizing my statement ...

--------

Look closer at the definition of ad hominem, I'll emphasize it for you.

__rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself__

It is not an ad hominem to point out that someone is cherry-picking, and it is, in fact, a form of dishonesty.

This is a far cry from your response, emphasis mine

> __You’re__ obsessed with deceit and dishonesty.

Let look back at the definition of ad hominem

> where the speaker attacks the __character, motive,__ ...

stop it.
Why does a small startup need several machines though?
Not just functions, but procedures too, and local variables. DEF PROC, DEF FN, and LOCAL.
Boats aren't constrained by weight like planes are. You could put any amount of batteries on a boat and get it to float and move on water. They can also be moved by wind. I may be wrong, but I also thought there existed some nuclear powered boats.
It's only impressive if you're not from Remulak.

Astronauts! To the Moon! Nya Nya Nya Nya Nya!
This doesn't work. Did you try it beforehand?
A wide range of people can build things. We trust only a few to build jets and skyscrapers, etc.

I think much the same will happen with regards to programming. Sure, most people will be able to bust out a simple script to do X. But if you want to do a "serious task", you're going to get a professional.
Yeah but a billion is so much better…
"Not technically a car" but I don't think that's the correct reason for why the article wouldn't have.
Or even a crontab! You know, the thing that this is named after.
Not every natural resource needs to be exploited 100% for profit.
I guess with less users and moderators they have more time to explore their hobbies over at reddit now.
The Engineer and the Computer Scientist
If it helps, some of the most successful people I know made their achievements by taking a risk on their current capabilities. It's obvious to say, but the best way to grow is to be in a position where you have a good growth opportunity - and inherently, that means you'll be swimming in a slightly bigger pond than you're comfortable in.

I don't know anything about the specifics of your situation, so definitely discount this advice if it's not applicable - but remember that every high level / successful person had to be, at some point, wholly out of their depth in order to rise to the occasion!
40 billion is an insignifiant amount for a rich country like thr US and the scientific knowledge that was gained from it and is still going on today is immesurable.

Personnaly I think it was way worth it and we should keep going to further science and knowledge.

Totally worth it imo.
Because managing servers adds a lot of tech overhead (OS and security updates/access control/disk/HA/monitoring) + provisioning/config + deployment.

That said, there will be a time when your SaaS costs more than managing infra.
Right! Even taking "return" very literally, the lunar rock samples brought back are incredibly valuable to science. And the spinoff/technological stimulus value of the program is even harder to quantify--consider that during one year, Project Apollo purchased >60% of U.S. semiconductor production. This was a critical early market for Fairchild Semiconductor, e.g. [1]

[1]:https://books.google.com/books?id=gXYItzQARVoC&pg=PA127&lpg=...
Did you actually try it? Bc it doesn't work for me
They include Tundra
https://docs.syncthing.net/advanced/folder-ignoredelete.html

It works well enough in a backup system, where the issue explained on the page isn't relevant.
I’m sure it helps their spam call filter.

/s
Okay but "moondoggle" is actually a fantastic pun to put down the space race (even if it did turn out to be wrong).
Jellyfin is great, pers, and is superior along the one axis that matters: freedom.
I remember OLGA, the On-Line Guitar Archive. In the 1990’s when I was learning to play guitar in my teens, OLGA hosted enough user-generated text-based tabs for me to learn every song I’d ever heard/wanted to play, for free.
Cloud setups are not reproducible, because you cannot reproduce the same env locally or in the other cloud.
I hope you don't read this comment because that's breaking my terms of service.
This is more or less already the case in the western judicial systems, where punishment is not meant to be a revenge. The harsher punishments (like executions) are meant to deter.

I think there are exceptions like Nuremberg trials where the executions were more of a revenge.
What is the return for all the kids that saw it and because of that decided to become scientists or engineers, and all the technology that they developed? I have no idea how to quantify that, but I can guarantee you that there was an effect. And just because you don't know how to quantify something doesn't mean you get to ignore it. Unknown doesn't mean 0.
Well, you know, things like microelectronics, medical imaging, telecommunications, weather forecasting, stuff like that. Nothing important. Certainly we would have been better off if that money was spent here on Earth rather than sending it all into space.
What is the point of publishing such an opinion on a newspaper?

People often point out how ridiculous these projections turned out to be, but seemingly nobody challenges their reason for existing.
As a Tesla owner I was surprised they're that low. I know probably 30 owners and haven't heard of any maintenance outside of tires and a few panel gaps at delivery.
This is a positive step by Google and a real positive for local journalism and journalism jobs.
SBF couldn't even keep track of a $40B because it seemed like too much of a hassle. It's interesting that people like that are business visionaries and yet the government is deemed ineffectual unless it's operating with 100% efficiency.

But again, the stuff we got from the space program makes it all an extreme bargain.
You can put ordinary crontab into your repo.
haha thank you ser. best way to thank me is to start your own LIP practice and pass it on :)
I agree, it wouldn't be the best to handle all json edge cases, but it would be a super easy way to quickly get data from a big chunk of simple json and you could just use subqueries or query chaining for nested results.

For anyone who hasn't used powershell, this is the difference I'm talking about. I would not be able to write either of these without looking up the syntax. But knowing very little about powershell, I can tell exactly what that command means while the bash command, not so much.

```powershell
$json | ConvertFrom-Json | Select-Object -ExpandProperty x
```

```bash
echo $json | jq '.x'
```
It's even worse that LLMs don't have a concept of lying: they are asked to generate text and they generate it, even if it means making things up or 'lying' as we generally call it. The real issue is the human people treating them as oracular fonts already.
Which society needed so we can we have twice as many people working and pay them half.

I think in an alternate timeline in which the washing machine is not invented, we would still send women to work.

The washing machine labour could have been solved with centralising washing as a society, in the same way we centralised childcaring.

The economic forces and the political propaganda were too strong.
Note that the first flight was also in 1903.

According to the legend I've heard - this was published the day before the Wright Brothers first flight in Dec 17 1903.

I didn't see the publication date in the article.
That's exactly what windmill.dev is (https://windmill.dev)
I've been looking for most of the past year.

My back is against the wall. I've applied to more companies than I can keep track of. I've exhausted my savings. Friends and family have already helped as much as they can. I'm days away from having some life changing situational events happen.

I've recently seen a small uptick in interviews, but over the last year almost nothing has moved past the initial call/zoom meeting.

I managed to pick up a single contract in September but that ended after a month (founder ran out of cash).

I've never seen the job market this bad in the last 15 years, and that's even including the 2007/8 financial crisis.

If anyone has any kind of role, no matter how junior, please contact me asap.
> Yes, the latter more difficult to do accurately, but if people were really able to evaluate themselves, they would be able to understand they’re, on average, below or above the median.

Lets suppose I ask you "How tall are you?" would you be able to answer? Good, then you are able to accurately asses your own height.

Now lets suppose I ask you "How tall are you as a percentile of this group including you and 99 people who you don't know who are". You should realize that you can't do that exactly as accurately because you don't have perfect knowledge of their heights just from knowing your own.

Now for the even more convoluted and actual Dunning-Kruger assessment. I ask you "How tall are you?" great, now at which percentile do you think your deviation from your actual height falls compared to the deviations from these other 99 peoples esstimates of their actual heights?
How on earth are you supposed to answer that unless you have some sort of knowledge about how they perform? Are people a cm off? Are some people 10cm off? Are people being mm precise?

The problem with the Dunning-Kruger effect is that it effectively says "People who are on average worse at estimating their own height tend to underestimate it, while people who are on average better at estimating their own height tend to overestimate it", but if you look at the absolute ability of people to estimate their own height it's similar independent of how close people get. But the Dunning-Kruger analysis methodology is set up such that it transforms random noise into an observation of the Dunning-Kruger effect, which is the problem highlighted in the OP. Part of the problem here is to have participants estimate on a percentile range instead of doing a simple absolute estimation. You can ask people "So how far off do you think you are in cm's?" And you'll see that people are fairly consistent in accessing their own ability and so the Dunning-Kruger effect goes away. The effect is a result of the methodology not of the actual people being test.

But that's a hard sell for most people because they have a bias about "dumb people" and the effect as originally stated confirms that bias, so people hold on to the conclusion even as holes in the methodology becomes apparent.
As a fan of big science projects, I find this line of thinking unconvincing.

The manhattan project cost roughly 56 billion in todays dollars vs. 149 billion for the Apollo program. The manhattan project effectively ended global great power conflict, likely saving hundreds of millions of lives from the inevitable catastrophe of a Warsaw pact vs. NATO conflict in Europe and Asia.

The F-35 program cost 1.5 trillion dollars, but this program was also effectively an omni-spending program for the military - sustaining fighter development and arguably deferring several major global conflicts.

We should judge projects by their individual merits rather than the justification that we're wasting less money than the alternative.
I would recommend being explicit about this expectation with him. Some shy people are badly calibrated and have the erroneous impression that they are speaking too much already leading to their low contribution rate. Make him aware of this issue and get his response to why it is happening and working together to address whatever the issue is.

You may also want to directly call on him in meetings to solicit his opinion thereby forcing him to speak ("Hey Bob, we haven't heard your thoughts yet, what do you think about option XYZ?"). If you do this often enough, he may see that his fears about speaking up are unfounded.
This is being worked on: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/21122. Should be available with the next Deno release.
I believe dropping and catching new battery pack in the air is the way to go as well!
Electric motors are smaller and can enable stationary flight. So stopping to change your pack is maybe a solution.
Julia has good ideas, interesting trade-offs here as well. ISTM the deep problem is that there’s so much room for optimization under composition of operations or with invariants not captured in types that the typical LinAlg library will never capture. But I agree most languages should be anticipating that users need something helpful here.
The amount of learned knowledge and skills from an endeavor like the space program extends out to so many industries. We can thank the space program for vital inventions like the Super Soaker
I've been sans Reddit for a couple of years now and it's been very low stress.
Previous Qualcomm laptops have been very expensive unfortunately.
More like Sans Reddit, har har am I right?

Discompliments to /u/spez.
Maybe I shouldn't be amazed by GPT stuff anymore, but this worked "surprisingly" well.

For instance, I gave it some javascript that uses sandboxed API function calls without any require statements. It somehow figured out the script was for Google Ads and properly documented a complex parallel execution callback function specifically for Google Cloud's API.
It means people will still be talking about your article a century later, which is better than most journalists can hope for in terms of longevity.
What is the zip disk bell curve in this context?