skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
it turns out you don't actually have to spend a lot on marketing a miracle weight loss drug, word spreads pretty well on its own. lots of companies spend lots of money on promoting drugs and basically none every go viral like this. you don't hear phrases like "ozempic face" because of novo's marketing budget. you can even see this in how people still talk about ozempic despite the actual weight loss labelled name being wegovy, and despite zepbound (tirzepatide) arguably offering a better option with lower side-effect burden through dual agonism of GIP.
Ever thought your wardrobe lacks a bit of meme magic? Brace yourselves, for Wojak Store is here to change that! Imagine strutting down the street, not just wearing clothes, but also wearing laughs – that's us.

We've got everything from the existential dread of the Doomer to the brainy charm of the Brainiak Wojak, all printed on stuff you can actually wear. Our collection is a riot – a fashion statement that says, "I know my Wojaks, and I wear them like a badge of honor."

Why just scroll through posts on 4Chan when you can literally wrap yourself in them? It's like social commentary, but make it fashion. And comfy. Very comfy. Whether you're coding away in a chilly office or debating the finer points of internet culture at a cafe, we've got you covered – literally.

Look forward to turning your wardrobe into a conversation starter, one chuckle-inducing piece at a time. Feedback, high-fives, and Wojak meme ideas are always welcome!
I'd imagine the extremely tiny portion of solder exposed to the water supply is nothing compared to the "lead-free" brass fittings which were permitted to contain various non-zero amounts of lead depending on the year, and still do.

But with most things, the dose makes the poison.
If you are interested in the tech-stack:

https://noiselith.notion.site/License-61290d5ed7ab4c918402fd...

So yes, it is an electron app with svelte, headless-ui, tailwindcss etc
No, because there are plenty of other sites that offer you that ability. Everyone knows that going to YT means ads. That's like showing up to Victoria Secrets and being shocked there's lingerie every where.
So... is this that "non-human biologics" people are talking about?

Jokes aside, clearing alot of hard work went into this and I do hope this works out in the long run
People think it's a race condition. Not knowing anything about this or having seen the UI, I would guess it's something really dumb.

Like maybe every number is sent as it's own Bluetooth packet, but then when you hit enter, that's when the point gets appended.

Because of some other insanity that needed this as a workaround, like, I don't know, maybe it starts out already showing a dot, and the numbers you type go after that, and for some reason they

....and then the Bluetooth stack reorders the enter key and the dot?

Or, maybe the command is sent with the decimal at the end, I'm a packet with other stuff, and the packet length can vary based on the other stuff, and the calculation is wrong.

Or it's even more like Therac, and they have two modes, a 10x and 1x mode, maybe because there's some hardware interlock on the 10x, but they both interpret the value differently and use different units , and there's some bug in selection logic?
> Unique does not mean important.

Thank you. This seems to have elicited a clarification from the other user, which I appreciate.

> It means hard to find elsewhere.

Well…"not found elsewhere". It's "the only instance within a given set".

You'll sometimes (perhaps increasingly?) encounter "more unique", "most unique", or similar. These usages dilute the meaning of 'unique' and make it more like 'unusal' or 'rare'. People who use 'unique' this way tend to resort to longer phrases to express 'unique'. Perhaps somebody knows a newer word for expressing 'unique'?
I remember that one of the plumbers or house inspectors recommended plastic pipes to us and I thought the same thing: lead solder or plastic leaching into the water.
One way to not get it noticed is by asking for special treatment. (Well, it might noticed just before deletion.)

The best way to get it noticed is by submitting a high-quality, well-thought-out resume along with your job application.
These wearable pumps, especially in combination with closed loop are a very interesting and important medical development that can improve quality of life for a huge number of people, but these sort of fuck-ups are really concerning. Inexcusable, especially because they have failed on multiple layers (code review, automated testing, acceptance testing, firmware development). Shocking, really and it makes me wonder wtf is going on at that company software development wise.
You need to read the claims. This patent could easily be circumvented, for instance, by making it a non-removable battery (i.e., it's installed afterwards but 'cannot' be removed...). There's probably other workarounds or loopholes but this patent seems relatively weak. I doubt Tesla will have any issues here.
I get the point but we can cure many many forms of cancer and have treatments for baldness so it feels like a moving goalposts situation.
I'm a designer and developer, contractor for 10yrs. I am curious about your roadmap and where you will be taking the product. I recently built my nextjs site fully in MUI but then switched everything to tailwind and native web elements. Material Design 3 web components are also being built so I'm working in those as they are built. There was something about the documentation that made me move in the direction that I did.
You pay for it.
Ad blocker are legal, banning them could be illegal.
Actix web and diesel.
for people with Intel video cards (all 10 of us!) there's also SD.Next (automatic1111 fork): https://github.com/vladmandic/automatic
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38418278
Time to hold Google liable for any damage by malware, phishing, scams etc. served by ads.
Diseases without the possibility of animal testing are going to take a long time.
Pardon me for the tangent, but I suspect that at least part of the issue is that people tend to think they are not affected by "bad information" (eg.: propaganda, mis/dis-information, information-noise...). I think most people would probably intuitively reject the idea that they could be influenced by their information consumption. So I don't think it's that surprising that the full costs of advertising are not taken very seriously; it's much easier to see the commercial motivation for advertising.
Yeah, I saw that, but tbh, I'm taking it with a grain of salt at this point. We've already seen one screenshot of the charge rate at ~70% and it wasn't great. It was showing ~10 minutes remaining to get to 80% too. That was on a slower charger, but the charge rate was less than 80 KW.

Considering how bad the 4680 Model Y was, I'm not optimistic.
Tesla's can charge at 75kW from regen braking... not nearly as fast as supercharging, but pretty fast I'd say.
There is a reason of the sanction, but there is always merchants try to smuggle (well say go through HK etc.) or just do this kind of tricks. Business is business. As said in Chinese, you will have people do blood business of killing human as long as you can earn some money. Or, with money, even Ghost (or foreigner) we can employ.
What if, for every ton of material lifted into orbit, the company doing the lifting was required to remove a ton of debris from orbit?

Yes I know government regulations make it all so much more difficult - paraphrasing Sam Bankman-Fried.

Hey I have a pitch for you... unfortunately, it will require you to work your sorry asses off for about three decades to make it work out, are you down for that, you bloated VC ticks?
NASA researchers get permission to apply for China's moon samples
I don't think that's a very good comparison. Cancer strikes at the very heart of what we are (a bunch of cells which are expected to cooperate and sometimes don't). Compared with that, tinnitus seems pretty hackable.
I haven't seen any of OPs comments, but I remember when Checkly (also in this space) first launched the founder of that was posting a lot here and on Reddit.

I wouldn't say their comments were that helpful or insightful - mainly just advertising. Now they've raised ~$10m. It's spam, but it works ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯
frontend “engineer”
Just, no. A taillight short doesn’t cause the radio not to work because of canbus. I have no idea what this nonsense is doing here but a guy advocating for carbureted ICE engines because “computers and electronics bad” in 2023 shouldn’t be take seriously on this site of all places.
There's also the factor for people who climb inside a lot that they have very inefficient movements outside.

Because the grips aren't as obvious, a lot of effort is wasted looking for placements that would be immediate indoors.
i just set mine to 1gb on creation and have never had space issues besides one time when i had to have an obscene number of different kernels bc reasons. not sure why distros default to spending less than 0.1% of disk space on a boot part.
This is the kind of content I come to hacker news for - thank you for posting and thank up voters for upvoting!
It looks like they're shipping.

https://www.newegg.com/p/0JB-00MZ-00007?item=9SIBRVSK1T1450
I remember watching this video a few months ago. As I write this I am debugging open source electronics I designed for our open source farming robot.

It seems like people see the growth in opaque proprietary electronics and they conclude that we should move back to old mechanical systems. But mechanical systems are not always more reliable.

What I really want more people to understand is that electronics are not the issue - proprietary designs are. Open source designs inherently have enough documentation that even if they don't come with some nice service manual, the nerds on the user forum can dig through the schematics and code to sort out what's what.

Unfortunately open source hardware just isn't getting enough coverage for people to really see the value in it, despite the entire internet being built on open source software. We need to find ways to communicate the power of open source beyond software. We could have open source modules in cars with open standards. Sure the manufacturers need a rugged PCB that can control lights, read sensors, interact with CAN BUS, etc. But there is no need for that system to be proprietary. We need to build and demonstrate the value of open source hardware to help people understand what is really possible. Because the call to move back to mechanical systems is really just a call to move back to systems that are intuitively understandable, and today's shadetree mechanics can read a forum post as well as anyone else. What we need are open, documented systems. Electronics are not the enemy, proprietary systems are.
The store will get flooded with lots of BS from people hoping to make quick bucks.
10,000 A100's
I very much doubt that.

"The man barrier to translation was that, while at 14KLOC of Python
reposurgeon was not especially large, the code is very dense. It’s
a DSL that’s a structure editor for attributed DAGs — algorithmically
complex, bristling with graph theory, FSMs, parsing, tricky data
structures, two robot harnesses driving other tools, and three
different operator-composition algebras. It became 21KLOC of Go." [1]

[1]: https://gitlab.com/esr/reposurgeon/-/blob/master/GoNotes.ado...
Been around a lot of climbers and skiers, many of whom at the elite level. The kind of lifestyle necessary to get to that level requires you to practice your sport instead of earning money, so you need outside support to live aka wealthy family. I dont think I've met a single person at high level in these activities who didnt come from a wealthy family. I am not trying to take away from their skill and accomplishment but that's the financial reality. It wasnt always this way but as the skill ceiling went up and cost of living went up it became more necessary.
Carnival is what we went with, but after all and sundry, it was $41k out the door (to be fair, we went up a trim level).
Thinking more directly about the subject in hand, what if we took their comment text as an example, and input it into a "responsible translation model"?

Taking what they wrote as harshly as possible, a translation model's output might include narrative elements from the transphobic judgement you are concerned about. That would be a problem, because it would amplify transphobic narratives.

Taking what they wrote as favorably as possible, a translation model's output might rephrase what was written, such that a pro-LGBTQIA+ inclusion narrative is more eloquently expressed than the author actually intended. That would be a problem, because hiding the reality of transphobic narratives would remove our ability to recognize and talk about them.

To make this even more complicated, what if we are using this model for real-time dialogue? What happens when someone says something vaguely transphobic, their words get translated to an inclusive narrative, and you continue that inclusive narrative in your reply? Should the translator alter your words to be transphobic? If it doesn't, then will the entire conversation go off the rails, or will both parties continue, oblivious of each others' ideological subtleties?

---

I don't believe for a second that a model could be trained to avoid toxic narrative and translate accurately.

Hallucination is a feature, not a limitation. The sooner "AI" narratives can accept this reality, the better.
The link (singular) I provided was to a database of / search engine for academic literature.

What more do you want? I essentially sent you to the entire corpus of human knowledge lol.
I disagree with GP. The impact on employees (junior or otherwise) and the hit to productivity exists, it's just a result of under investment in remote-first working practices. Anything between fully remote and fully in office / everyone in the office on the same days per week is going to be shown to be disaster.

I think the effects are going to start presenting now, but because it's a new phenomenon for most organizations, it won't be recognized for another year or so. The next 2-5 years are going to be littered with stories along the lines of 'progress ground to a halt and nobody could put their finger on why, so we tried a bunch of stuff that didn't work and eventually realized it was a lack of any remote strategy'
Not due to the default judgement itself, but due to the finding of contempt that comes when you don't comply with the order that came with the judgement.
This must be a US-centric thing, having had many dishwashers in my time and having never seen one with anything other than a cold water inlet.

I assume this is related to the availability of 230v/15A for the heater element.
Or if you’re fired, convince 80% of the org that you’re taking their big payday with you.
Yes. It looks at what extensions you have in Chrome and downloads the equivalent Firefox version from Mozilla's add-ons for supported extensions:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/import-data-another-bro...
And that is exactly why I don't want advertising in my life. I don't think I'm smart enough to outwit an army of psychologists, marketeers and other vermin that have institutional knowledge dating back decades in order to know exactly what buttons to press in me to make me behave in a certain way. It's a personal hygiene thing.
Hello, have you tried to write link on your work in HN account description? You could host it on github.

Good luck!
sorry

X * 10,000 A100's
That's my understanding also. I only do it if I was already using hot water recently though. It seems pretty wasteful to pour all of that perfectly good cold water down the drain while I wait for the hot stuff to get to the faucet.
> we can cure many many forms of cancer

We can try. Sometimes the cancer doesn't come back, and sometimes it does, and in no case do we understand why. This is not what most people mean by "cure".
My wife only pays 79 a week
> I've felt "full" at 1500 kcal/day for months...

How are you handling nutritional requirements? Do you take a bunch of supplements? Are you loading up on protein?
> Using SQLite instead of Redux sounds reasonable.

The trick is reactivity. `redux` handles surgically updating the view based state changes. It's not enough to have sqlite, you also need reactivity. Further, apply strict types on top of sqlite/SQL is another big challenge.
And that is also why Dragon Data owes me about 4,000 UKP (in 1980's money).
you have two problems with new formulations though. one is lead-free solder seldom works as well as the box claims. two, antimony is somewhat concerning from a toxicity standpoint though i'd say less than lead

i wonder if we don't just quit and go to brazing all joints. rod is pricier than solder and takes more heat but probably less toxic and certainly more dutable
What about the inverse?

Can it make sure that the output toxicity level is not lower than the input?

If not (which I strongly suspect is the case), then that is unacceptable. We cannot fight toxic narratives with ignorance.
Can confirm, it works pretty well (and much more convenient than wired). Well I was using Virtual Desktop, but SteamLink probably works similarly.
Japanese culture has a particular attraction to westerners.

But it’s an illusion from marketing than reality.

It may be true that many aspects of Japanese culture are better than the American stuff, but doesn’t mean Japan has any global advantage in their fancy niche products over other countries like China, Korea, Sweden, or Switzerland.

Just as an example, the pantheon comb by a Slovakian company eclipses this “fancy” 200 dollar Japanese one.
Not any more, but when I was learning to climb, ca 2000, I was living in the Boulder area, and the Smear loomed pretty large in the legendarium I came up in.
I think you are so dead set on seeing things your way that you have lost something along the way: the ability to step out of this for a moment and to observe that YT is infrastructure, not content owned by Google and that the difference between Victoria's Secret and YT is that there are many alternatives to VS but no clear alternatives to YT and with such a dominant market position come certain obligations. This is exactly what anti-trust is all about. If VS commanded 80% of the market for underwear and they decided you can only buy their underwear if you also inject yourself with some unknown substance (which is roughly how I see advertising consumption, it is pure poison for your brain) then we'd have a comparison.
Apple boxes from the supermarket work well too
Good point - the main issue is we encountered this exact issue with our old package Hyperlearn (https://github.com/danielhanchen/hyperlearn).

I OSSed all the code to the community - I'm actually an extremely open person and I love contributing to the OSS community.

The issue was the package got gobbled up by other startups and big tech companies with no credit - I didn't want any cash from it, but it stung and hurt really bad hearing other startups and companies claim it was them who made it faster, whilst it was actually my work. It hurt really bad - as an OSS person, I don't want money, but just some recognition for the work.

I also used to accept and help everyone with coding up their startup's software, but I never got paid or even any thanks - sadly I didn't expect the world to be such a hostile place.

So after a sad awakening, I decided with my brother instead of OSSing everything, we would first OSS something which is still very good - 5X faster training is already very reasonable.

I'm all open to other suggestions on how we should approach this though! There are no evil intentions - in fact I insisted we OSS EVERYTHING even the 30x faster algos, but after a level headed discussion with my brother - we still have to pay life expenses no?

If you have other ways we can go about this - I'm all ears!! We're literally making stuff up as we go along!
Wow, this is a great topic. I don't really have specific suggestions, but I'd like to contribute some thoughts on the matter.

Monetizing anything isn't inherently problematic; the challenge lies in defining what should be paid for and what should be offered for free.

In the realm of open-source products and SaaS, the common practice is to provide free self-hosting options while charging for cloud hosting or enterprise-specific features, such as access control and authentication integrations.

However, the landscape becomes significantly more challenging for LLMOps (assuming you are still focusing on training as a major aspect of your business, which can be categorized as LLMOps).

Historically, there haven't been many success stories in this area (with exceptions
like wand.ai, which focusing on tracking experiments). I believe this difficulty arises from the largely ad-hoc nature of training and fine-tuning processes, making standardization a challenge, coupled with the infrequency of these tasks.

That being said, training/finetuning is a valuable technique. However, transforming it into a company that offers products is really challenging. Successful examples in this realm typically depend heavily on solution customization or consulting-oriented business models.
Say what you will about Musk, but he's making an effort in this regard. He has open sourced a number of goodies with Tesla.
Is this onsite only?
I realize they're different, but it seems like there are some similarities. In both, you have some chain of operations you need to do, and you want to minimize their cost and optimize for cache benefits etc.,

This is a pretty good overview paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.02692.pdf (they claim to be better than the rest -- I haven't evaluated their claims in practice yet)

The techniques are mostly about ordering and common subexpression elimination for XOR operations and choosing "better" matrices to do the computation with. CRS codes can be used with many different matrices, but it turns out some are better than others for effiency (XOR operations are encoded by 1s in the CRS matrix, so if you choose a CRS matrix with fewer of them while meeting the requirements, you can do less operations and get the same results).
I don't see this as a non-issue as a scientist. It's a massive problem. It means that when I read papers, I'm constantly extremely suspicious of the results.

As a scientist this how I always read papers. It's how I was trained. Don't just read the results, read the paper and critique it - was the method appropriate? were control tests performed? is the statistical analysis sound? And even beyond that - if a substantial claim is made, it's assumed to be an anomaly until reproduced by others.

I will say that labs get a reputation. Well known labs with PIs who produce good science are usually treated with a more accepting view (i.e. this is probably true). Unknown labs are treated with a ton of suspicion.
Electronic systems can quite easily be far more reliable than mechanical systems.

High voltage ignition systems are a really good example. I used to own a 1973 Buick LeSabre with a stupid low-voltage ignition system for "emissions control" purposes. Any water inside the engine compartment, and your engine would stall. Put a modern high-voltage ignition system on that and you could damn near submerge the engine and it would keep going.

The problem here is a lack of interface standardization (for example: old school taillights all connected to bulbs the same way). If auto manufacturers were required to document interfaces and accept third party parts, they would have to design everything defensively and these kinds of silly issues would go away.

The problem isn't electronics--it's engineering. And the problem isn't engineers--it's management cutting every corner they can.
Um, last I checked, the repository was a bunch of PDF user manuals.

Has that changed?