skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Apologies for the lazy question... But with so many incredible models being released, how are you all keeping up? Are you mostly trying them all out on the web or are you installing each of them locally?
Personally I prefer the shortened ISO8601 format (YYYY-MM-DD). While it's not the most efficient, efficiency doesn't often matter on that level. It's unambiguous, can be parsed by practically any library, and easily human-readable.

I'd avoid using unix timestamps for day-resolution, since it's very easy to make a mistake with the timezone when parsing, which you only notice when changing between a positive and negative timezone.

Julian day is another option, but support for it is not quite as universal. If efficiency is important, that's the format I'd use.
Do you have any engineering information to back that up?
It takes 250 ms for something to fall 1 foot under the weight of gravity, which is also approximately how long it takes to go from arms crossed to arms at side.

Which is well under the 2 seconds computational photography clip.
if this tomcat shipped with the recently found log4j vulnerability, you might have not had the chance to make an upgrade!
Disclosure: I work for FusionAuth.

We're a commercial offering with self-hosted and SaaS options. I don't have a ton of insight into your needs, but it is a solid, well documented external authentication system.

We have a free option available here: https://fusionauth.io/download or you can pay us for premium features, hosting or support.
The chat interface is pretty snappy: https://chat.deepseek.com/
Hopefully doesn’t end up like Franklin W. Smith. You know Abraham Lincoln having to intervene against the military with his “long arm of the law” and all. History Rhymes.
Alfred Version v2.3
Alfred version v2.3 has been going very well. With the help of our wonderful community, its excepted to release in early within next week. We plan on adding a few more languages.

http://github.com/alfredredbird/alfred
It was a Yamaha raptor kit banged with zero motorcycle. Which is one step closer to production than a dancer off craigslist dressed in a white full body leotard.

There are some actual electric ATVs available (in fact polaris/zero have partnered up to make some) but mostly they're ugly utv side-by-side beefed up golf carts.
Oh god, I read the whole thread with Bandcamp in mind (I work in music) because of the recent drama and was utterly confused with the replies. Wonder if this happened to others!
The parent isn't trying to prove this to you like an argument in a debate. They are providing you with a potential direction for further research in case you are interested in learning more.
That Lexus is an EV.
Yeah, if you follow this logic... then humans are just a bunch of molecules. Mostly water. Some protein and fat.

Why do humans have any right at all? I can't take this seriously. Molecules don't have rights.
Heheh, I’ll take obnoxious pedantry over an anecdotal factoid any day!
Listen, I'm on your side of the argument and this example makes no sense at all.
Plus bloat in general.

Well, the Unix Haters complained about it! Let's see, what did they write:

• “Being small and simple is more important than being complete and
correct.”
• “You only have to solve 90% of the problem.”
• “Everything is a stream of bytes.”

Well, everything is still a stream of bytes. The problems are maybe 95% solved, and things are no longer small or simple.

E.g. could no longer have your kernel on one floppy disc, and a rescue image with glibc + utilities on another.
Maybe we need to start talking about acceleration laws? How is a giant truck accelerating to 60mph in <3 seconds safe?
>In the end, this tech just takes control from you.

1. "This tech" is too broad of a qualifier, as GP is talking about computational photography in general, which is many things at once. Most of those things work great; some others are unpredictable. There are plenty of custom camera apps besides Apple's default camera which will always try to stay as predictable as possible.

2. There is such a thing as too much control. Proper automation is good, especially if you aren't doing a carefully set up session. The computational autofocus in high-end cameras is amazing nowadays. You can nail it every time now without thinking, with rare exceptions.
when you think about it, with rolling shutter, no row (or column?) of pixels are from the same moment in a given picture unless you are shooting with a global shutter camera - which is rare for consumer type devices.
For decades people have had the ability to get great photos using cell phones that included useful features like automatically adjusting focus, or exposure, or flash all without their phones inventing total misrepresentations of what the camera was pointed at.

I mean, at a certain point taking a less than perfect photo is more important than getting a fake image that looks good. If I see a pretty flower and want to take a picture of it, the result might look a lot better if my phone just searched for online images of similar flowers, selected one, and saved that image to my icloud, but I wouldn't want that.
There are a couple of cars: Plymouth Prowler, Chrysler PT Cruiser, Volkswagen new Beetle, and now Tesla Truck

… that after initial splash will look super lame, fad-ey, gaudy, and dorky. Close your eyes and visualize two Plymouth Prowlers next to each other at the red light - it’s going to look just like that.

I hope they follow it up with a stylish but otherwise classy looking variant.

I wonder how is the second-hand market for PT Cruisers…
Which kinds of chemicals? Why multiple?

Or are they used for other purposes but affect ripening?
If I trust those numbers, and its not easy to trust anything from Tesla, then I could conclude that Teslas with autopilot are safer per mile on the easy stretches of highway where people are more comfortable enabling it than everyone is anywhere. It would be amazing if they couldn't match that extremely low bar, more comparable statistics would be comparing with other vehicles when their cruise controls are enabled.
and for those who don't there are a bunch of photo apps that allow far more control & iphones can shoot raw now
An obvious, easy solution would be to allow car makers to classify a vehicle as either a "car" or a "truck" (once classified, it cannot be reclassified without the car maker being subject to the worst of both worlds).

Cars can be driven with a car driving license.

Trucks can be driven with a truck driving license, or CDL, or have to be registered by a company, or _whatever licensing requirement makes it perfectly feasible for people who need one for work but enough of a PITA that private individuals don't bother getting it_.
A regular gaming PC will do, about a grand, then slot in a 3090 or something off eBay. Congratulations, you're a grand under-budget, but already have a viable development machine.
Grammarly is awful. I remember
adding custom grammarly attributes to sensitive password fields so that Grammarly would not read and store our users' passwords inside their service. So nasty.

This company would sure make a great asset for the FBI, NSA and CIA given that they're so interested in snooping in on foreign language speakers; which happen to be grammarly's main demographic. The thing is malware.
Incorrect. It gets you less editorial magic, but all cameras make decisions about how they create RAW images.

Even cameras that don't make any intentional decisions end up making decisions because of the physics of the sensor as an electrical device and how you read each sensor element.
I never hit the button unless absolutely necessary.

It rudely makes cars stop and wait while also giving drivers nothing to do other than stare at me.

It’s much easier and less aita (reddit reference) to just cross against traffic when light to nil. And I’d rather live dangerously.

However, not recommended if you are prone to tripping or fainting, or at night, or if there is a certain level of traffic. ymmv depending on locale.
Better than Jira is not exactly a high bar.
Almost seems like the goal was to build a planetary rover, in line with Musk's stated aims. Welcome to Mars, here's your space truck. Maybe that's why it needs to be meteorshower-proof?
The GP is a quite informed and informative comment. Honestly, randomly saying "AI-generated" under others' comments is a much more bot-like behavior.
Deduplication requires an absolutely enormous amount of memory, unless you have a dataset that has a huge amount of duplication for some reason (maybe a company or school where a lot of people have their own network storage and put the same large files in?) it is usually never the right choice to enable dedup.

It is cheaper to buy more disk than the memory to enable dedup (somebody could run the numbers). ZFS ARC also likes lots of memory and you get good performance gains with more memory allocated to it.

In other words, turn on LZ4 compression everywhere and don’t think about it otherwise.
turning off fast user switching didnt fix it?
Couldn't it be using frames from before the shutter was pressed? Could the processing take longer when people\animals are in the frame?
question(s):

would you consider a small saas product in this realm? that is, is there a clear distinction for what could be considered an agency vs a saas product? or is the line blurred in some contexts?
This affects almost nobody. It's not gonna matter.
What they’re trying to do is give you a number that they think compares more directly with the sticker price on an ICE truck.

They’re trying to say:

Okay, this truck costs $CYBER. and that looks like more than $RAM. But the ownership cost of $RAM is really $RAM + $GAS, and the cost of $CYBER is $CYBER + $ELECTRIC - $REFUND. And $CYBER + $ELECTRIC - $REFUND might be less than $RAM + $GAS. And Tesla would like you to notice that.

And Tesla’s mathemarketing geniuses said: ah, but if $CYBER + $ELECTRIC - $REFUND is less than $RAM + $GAS, then $CYBER + $ELECTRIC - $GAS - $REFUND would also be less than $RAM.

And since Dodge advertises the price of their truck as $RAM, Tesla thinks it’s only fair for them to advertise the ‘fair comparison’ price of their truck as $CYBER + $ELECTRIC - $GAS - $REFUND.

Which by some weird twisted logic makes sense, and the absolute difference in prices is somewhat meaningful, but it gives a misleading impression of the amount you’ll spend and the relative amount you’ll save.

Because it implies you’ll only end up spending $CYBER + $ELECTRIC - $GAS - $REFUND on your Tesla compared to $RAM on your Dodge. It feels like you’re saving $SAVINGS/$RAM.

But you’re actually going to spend $CYBER + $ELECTRIC - $REFUND (which is a bigger number than they are showing) compared to $RAM + $GAS on the Dodge (admittedly also not a number Dodge is advertising anywhere). And you’re actually only going to save $SAVINGS/($RAM + $GAS), which is a smaller proportional saving (remember we don’t know how big Tesla assumes $GAS is, only that they say $GAS - $ELECTRIC is $3000).

But it also assumes that what you’re going to do is follow their logic and take their ‘potential savings’ comparable price, and compare it to the sticker price on an ICE truck. Rather than look at that number and compare it to another truck and then apply your own estimated TCO differential to figure out the all in cost. In which case you’ll double count the TCO difference to Tesla’s benefit.

So yeah, it’s a dishonest bit of math.
Most LLM model use shouldn't be 'raw' but as part of a smart & iterative pipeline. Ex:

* reading: If you want it to do inference over a lot of context, you'll need to do multiple inferences. If each inference is faster, you can 'read' more in the same time on the same hardware

* thinking: a lot of analytical approaches essentially use writing as both memory & thinking. Imagine iterative summarization, or automatically iteratively refining code until it's right

For louie.ai sessions, that's meant a fascinating trade-off here when doing the above:

* We can use smarter models like gpt-4 to do fewer iterations...

* ... or a faster but dumber model to get more iterations in the same amount of time

It's entirely not obvious. For example, the humaneval leaderboard has gpt4 for code being beat by gpt 3.5 for code when run by a LATS agent: https://paperswithcode.com/sota/code-generation-on-humaneval . This highlights that the agent framework is the one really responsible for final result quality, so their ability to run many iterations in the same time window matters.
> Also, for the replication piece is the SQLite bit actually important or could you actually support arbitrary backends and SQLite is just convenient? Eg could you support browser LocalStorage instead of WASM SQLite or is there some piece of functionality of SQLite you’re relying on?

SQLite is supported practically everywhere, so that's our first choice. We also modelled our sync rules on SQLite's type system and functions to a large extent.

However, there is nothing technical tying is to SQLite. The sync protocol works purely with JSON, and doesn't impose any restrictions on how the data is stored or queried.

For the JourneyApps platform where PowerSync was originally used, we actually have an implementation on top of IndexedDB for browsers, which ends up being more lightweight. It needs more work before we can expose it as a general library, so we just started with SQLite for now.
Do 401(k)s have clawbacks? I had never heard of that before and googling around all I found was articles about the complexity of clawing back things like sign on bonuses if the employee had immediate access to the 401(k) plan and had deferred part of the sign on. It also wasn’t “impossible” to get the sign on back, just complex.

I also have never seen a company allowing day 1 401(k) access but maybe I’ve always worked at a shittier tier of companies
You act has if windows does not exist. My company and most of the companies I know run on windows server for line of business functions which are one prem when run on VMware

Contaniers and Linux may run the cloud but at least in the US Microsoft owns on prem workload for every day business functions

For every Linux server I manage there is about 30 or 40 Windows servers
Is it working now? I used for about half a year until MacOS Sonoma when it breaks and I had enough. MacOS is just not built for customization, it's frustrating.
If you're insistent on your tools being set in stone for ten years, you're probably in the wrong business.
There are tools that you can use to force the model to give structured output, such as llama.cpp GBNF grammar for example. They're a bit harder to use than ask gpt4 but they do work pretty well for what I use it for.
Used to have an old crew cab with 8’ bed, but it was too long for our driveway. I loved that truck, crew cab and all. But that was years ago. I live in an area prone to wildfires, so I can understand the need for 4WD, etc. We have two SUVs in the driveway, but I don’t call them trucks.
And wheelbase / swaying, right?
"I was terminated because I'm <insert protected class here>"
Ah, this is specifically for Xbox apps, not games. You're not getting access to a bunch of things with this method (especially w.r.t. graphics APIs.) As far as I can tell, the full GDK is still behind a contract and NDA.
Why We Stopped Making Einsteins
And if you're using microservices it's either a total migration (a no go for anyone minimizing bugs and outages), or a slow one-by-one trudge, if you use some commons between them that commons will need to support both javax and jakarta together, superbly fun
This - I remember Eclipse putting me off Java for years.
IntelliJ is so much better, and if you use Maven or Gradle, the IDE really does just figure it out for you.
I look at this thing and can't help thinking "where will someone set down their coffee mug when their hands are full and they need to open the door?" There isn't a flat surface on it.
The vendor’s stated position is that they are apolitical. Duke dropped the vendor because of what a founder posts on his personal website. People are blasting duke because they think it’s a dumb thing to do. Duke is of course free to do what they want.
The difference you’re missing is contrition. Among those advocating for second chances one of the key steps is the party acknowledging the harm they’ve done so as not to do it again.
Really interesting stuff... it might be worth adding some before-and-after examples to the repo.

What kind of PDF are you tweaking it for? How does it handle handwritten annotations?
Some people just want to see the world burn, I guess. It's just new and different, just like so many things we now take for granted. It's one thing to be critical when something is a proven failure, but to never give it a chance means there is ulterior motive afoot.
On Quantum Teleportation
I've seen the technique of using the knife to rotate the pit, but I don't really do it because I'm generally happy with radial pieces so cutting the pit half into quarters isn't a problem. I also just generally have one avocado at a time, so I'm not going for speed (as one would say making guac).

But my point was that unless you actually slice the pit in half, neither half is going to have a flat face that you can put on a plate of oil or whatever. Rather one half is going to have the pit sticking out, and the other half is going to have a pit shaped indentation that doesn't touch the oil.
> 401(k) clawbacks, also known as a corrective distribution, occur when a company's 401(k) plan fails to meet certain regulatory requirements, such as nondiscrimination testing. These tests are designed to ensure that a 401(k) plan does not disproportionately benefit highly compensated employees (HCEs) over non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs).

Hense my use of the word "equity"
They don’t actually advertise that as the sticker price, for one thing: the page clearly states what the price is and gives you the option to switch to sticker price.

Secondly, I think the selling point of EVs is the TCO, even with today’s relatively expensive EVs, significantly less expensive all-gas cars end up being cheaper (and the Tesla is more appealing to me than hybrids, which frequently feel bad as someone who really likes to drive). But, it makes sense to me for the landing page to instruct the users about this (like Energy Star appliances do): the UX design might not be the best here, but it’s pretty hard to get all the way through the Tesla sales flow without being told clearly what the actual cost is.
I’m a native english speaker. The conflict was extensively covered on public radio, Democracy Now and the BBC World Service.
Craftsman is interesting because its been there and back again
RAW in modern phones and apps is often stacked/processed as well. However, it always tries to stay as photometrically correct as possible (at least I'm not aware of any exceptions). All "dubious" types of processing happen after that.
> changing the page size to be the same size as Postgresql uses (8kb)

Mind, you shouldn't really change the record size without knowing your use-case. Make a PostgreSQL file system, set it's recordsize to 8k. That's a good idea.

Not so much a good idea doing that to all your filesystems. Stick to the defaults without a good justification to deviate.
With my C# codes not heavily tied to specific .Net frameworks, it's not really affected by breaking compatibilities. However I avoid the latest IDE (VS 2022) which come with the latest frameworks as the IDE is often noticeably slower.
I also looked into more obsure bands I'm into. I suspect the relatedness is affected by the band lineups of previous tours
Try to photograph a toddler without this feature. Good luck. Does the fact that the iPhone allows me to do this pretty reliably without any fuss mean I have more or less control?
Just a thought but if its 48V and its ethernet I wonder if it is using power over ethernet?
Increasing rates is their attempts to bring inflation back to normal, since cheap money is cheap for _everyone_, including all Americans that were eager to get a low monthly payment on cars/houses (as I’ve alluded to), not just for existing collateral but for new homes/cars, thus increasing total demand - and that demand leading to price increases across the board.
With Tesla being constantly under the microscope, it would be difficult to not trust the data. They know that one misstep will seal their doom.
Once you have 700 units in the field, one failure per 700 days is no longer quite so rare.
Lots of good advice in that article, but I think the simplest advice is: for categorical data, just use tableau10.
It has its defenders - including among HN commenters that own one - but the Plaid seems to me to be an extremely silly vehicle.
"OpenAI has no moat" aged so badly that it's almost a satire.
There is a gradle plugin that can rewrite jar dependencies class files to be jakarta packages from javax. This makes updating your code the major issue versus also figuring out every dependency at once.
> A “bulletproof” body has been a key feature since the Cybertruck's introduction in 2019; today Musk admitted it was there for no good reason.

Maybe he's trying to provide vehicles for a "Tesla War."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War

https://abcnews.go.com/International/us-officials-isis-toyot...

> Maybe the rich survivalists playing out Blade Runner meets Mad Max in their Cybertrucks haven't considered that when everything burns down, the power grid will go down too.

He also owns SolarCity! That's part of his shtick!
Turbo Pascal was my first real programming language (after BASIC and a bit of 8086 assembly) in my pre-teen years, and I read the manual very thoroughly. It was fascinating to learn, even though much of it was over my head.

I remember sitting at the living room table on many evenings, studying a stack of printed out source code. My task was to contribute to translating a bulletin board system called WWIV.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWIV

I went on to study Turbo C, which came with a wonderfully informative manual also. That experience formed the foundation of my programming in the next decades (2~3).
SpaceX rockets are burning bright red holes in Earth's atmosphere
Would you buy apples from someone who has a personal blog and posted on that blog that they don’t like affirmative action?
IIUC, Ultium is 400V in operation and only switches to 800V while charging on 800V units.

This sounds a little different. It operates at 800V and switches to 400V for charging.

I think that will simplify things and hopefully avoid Ultium's weird glitches during charging.
But it doesn't understand what it is interacting with. It only knows token math. Token math is a shortcut, not a true knowing of a subject. So if I ask what thought process it used to reach that conclusion, it can't enumerate why it chose that way other than "math said to".
Nice! The only missing feature is conversion of plots to ASCII art ; )
By leveraging Django's db transaction machinery in concert with Django's post save signals we send full representations to a user configurable replication target.

We provide a Matrix (protocol) replication target implementation but system's architecture was designed to be transport and database agnostic.

Our goal is to make it easy for developers to build offline-first decentralized applications for private / permissioned networks.
If you take this thing seriously, you're in a cult.
Odd. I have hundreds of great shots of my toddlers, none taken with these “features”.
That was a great read, but there was one thing I didn't understand: Why would the regex string have "." twice in a row? What does ".." find that "." doesn't find? Does that just mean "at least two characters"?
The military is not auditable, which is an open invitation for waste, fraud, and corruption. High ranking officers retiring to extremely lucrative board positions at military contractors is standard practice. This is no coincidence.