skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Isn't the normal frequency response of a healthy ear dependent on the shape of the ear cartilage and the configuration of the ear canal and the ear drum? It would be different for every individual

Yes, there's some individual variation, but human ears are all generally roughly the same structure, so there are known baselines for how they work. There's about 40 dB difference in minimum audible threshold between 50 Hz and 5 kHz. Same with near the top end of the hearing range, though where exactly that lies is more subject to individual variation (and age)

>so it is not easily quantifiable therefore the inverse operator will not be exact, optimum, or anything else. However, if you can model the signal then you should be able to design the inverse operator.

It's not originating from actual sound, so I think the approach fundamentally doesn't apply. Active noise canceling relies on destructive interference to actually physically remove the sound before it is perceived. Once you have the nerve signal, I think there simply isn't an anti-sound that would result in some other nerve signal that adds up to perceived silence.
"Grips"? I guess you mean "holds" (indoors). "Placements"? That's where you place gear, not your fingers, and you don't place gear in climbing gyms. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but pretending to have knowledge of something you know nothing about is a real problem on HN (and the internet in general). Best to say nothing than make a fool of yourself – something I'm still learning.
Brutalism is yet another form of socialism that managed to make the world a bit sadder.
today there were no assignments...Charly, did you do all your homework? yes mum
As someone who has few high load dynamic ones, I am getting those by dozens. Likely google "improves" the algorithm by which those are decided and voila.

The good thing is I never got to spot any correlation between SERP and those "reasons".
I can't believe this is still a problem. How hard is it to write the code for "the label for a street in the viewing frame should be located within the viewing frame"? Why am zooming in and out, and moving the window around to get a street name to appear when there's clearly room for it. It's a map app!
It's more that the thought process of interpolating things from two quotes indicates not much activity going on between the ears.
Demolition Britain – where new-build schools are too dangerous for pupils
Reading through these threads has left me crying on the bus. I’m ashamed that I can’t pay my rent this month after my cat died, and feel foolish for spending that money with the vet that tried to save her. I feel I caused my own hardship. I’m not sure what I’m going to do yet, but I’ve been listing my belongings on Marketplace to try and make up the gap. So if anyone in Australia wants to buy my MacBook Air or PS5, say hi.
https://archive.ph/E4mgv
I think it's two different things. When using it to equalize ears hands free, it's the tensor veli palatini (tvp) you're contracting to open the eustachian tube.

Of course, one might not be able to distinguish what muscles one is contracting, so it might be that most people actually tense both the tvp and the tympani at the same time, getting both the roaring sound from the tympani and the clicking sound from the tvp when the tubes open. Hence it's two different, but connected, things.
I bet there were bonuses and promotions so it's fine. Who cares about the users.
Porsche sells every car they make, even ridiculously expensive special editions that have insane margins, plus their legendary menagerie of costly options. The upcoming electric maccan is going to print money for them. I wonder where this idea that they're dying comes from.
Because many people believe that making beautiful things is a way to praise their God. Hopefully they're entitled to spend their money the way they like.
Curious why an archive link when the original link [0] is very much alive. To protect against site rot ?

[0] https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2022/01/the-revenge-of-the...
Prolonged exposure to loud sounds, short extremely loud sounds (explosions), ototoxic drugs (some antibiotics, chemo..) and substances (toluene..) and viral infections that spread into inner ear can all cause cochlear damage and therefore tinnitus.
Sure, crossing the Ts and dotting the Is are the job of diplomats. Hopefully it will happen. That doesn’t mean that a technical proposal must only be allowed once that is all squared away. In fact the existence of a widely deployed technical solution makes it easier to achieve consensus on the protocols.
how various devices handle redirects to external sites

Isn't a simple redirect in the same window enough? Redirect to OIDC provider -> login -> redirect back APP -> get OIDC state from URI params?
> why would you fix something that wasn't broken?

Because if you're not pretending to do something useful somebody might think that the company doesn't need you anymore. So you have to invent something to do and breaking working stuff just happens.

I also noticed that Google Maps looks like a watercolor now with more white margins around.
Aeon Flux is wonderful. About 20 years ago Peter Chung curated his favorite episodes for some animation festivals. Pity it never was released on Blu-Ray from what I can find via the Blu-Ray.com forums.
For what it's worth, I had that and pretty all my friends I bothered to ask could also hear old TVs back when were kids. It is exceedingly common.
I do not think the word “singularity” means in this context what the author thinks it means in this context (technological rapture).

And it is pure sophistry to claim that if AGI will exist in the future then it also exists in the present and the past.
Yep, seen all of these. Got a new one a couple of weeks back: some pages on my site http://www.example.com/ aren’t being indexed because of “Page with redirect”. This is the http:// → https:// 301 redirect which has been in place since the day I created the site. But apparently Google forgot about it a week earlier, and then noticed it again and mentioned it.

Some cases where I’ve seen “element too small” must indicate a bug in the browser or the measuring: no scripting, CSS failing to load wouldn’t make it any smaller, and the content is all after the meta viewport declaration (of course). So unless the entire thing is deliberately faked (which seems unlikely), it’s got to be a bug in the browser or measuring.
The Way to Better Mental Health May Go Through Your Stomach
Windhawk – The customization marketplace for Windows programs
U.S. Navy Works to Salvage Plane from Fragile Hawaiian Bay
I’d agree that layers of OIDC should be an anti-pattern but aside from that my experience with OIDC (developing and running it in production) has been nothing short of amazing.

Before OIDC it we had (mostly) SAML but it is a beast by comparison and was limited to enterprise use.

The ability of being able to switch auth out with another identity provider with such ease has been nothing short of a blessing.

Yes some overuse redirects and do weird things but the social ones I’ve used plus Okta and my own home grown ones have all been fine.
Frenzel is not done by controlling the muscles in the ear. It's done by controlling your epiglottis and your tongue and push air against a blocked nose. So while it's hands free, it's not the same.[1]

With controlling the muscles in the ear, one can do it without a nose clip. It's called BTV (or VTO sometimes in English)[2], and instead of forcing air in to open the eustachian tube, you just open it by muscles.

[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ear_clearing
[2]: https://www.freedivinginstructors.com/article/204
An order to show cause?

I guess you could call that an “investigation,” although it feels weird to me. By “on my own,” he has to be referring to sanctions power. He has no authority to just go a-sleuthing. “Outside of this trial” means he’s not going to disrupt trial proceedings with an order to show cause, even though he could, because some of the sanctions available to him include things that would immediately impact this trial (from a mandatory inference jury instruction up to default judgment).
What's even less intuitive is that while hybrids are the most reliable category, plugin hybrids are the least reliable. Aren't they just a hybrid with a bigger battery and a charging port?
My guess is that whatever clever network optimizations that Google has are probably interfering with their traffic.

By building their own network stack, they are skipping them and also wireguard might be better equipped to dealt with occasional faults as it built on udp which is inherently unreliable.
It should be yes, although I think what the parent was getting at was layers of OIDC where one provider redirects to another and then you get 2 redirects back.

I’ve seen it a few time and can only conclude it’s the work of amateurs.
That's cute. Seems like a classic case of "you can't make someone understand something when their job depends on not understanding it", but in case anyone at Google reads this, here's a hint: People won't use Chrome if adblock is ineffective. They will use Edge, or Safari, or (in case you think you can make backroom deals with Microsoft and Apple to implement this in their browsers too), they'll use Brave. It's not a winnable game, save your money and play something else.
I love your approach to recruitment, and may even check you out next time I'm looking for work, but one small thing. Your website says:

Our website has no flashy buttons, fancy graphics, eye-catching JavaScript animations, or stock photos with grinning people, and that is by design

Is it irony that this text slides in with an animation? :-)

Great work, keep going, I'd love to see this sort of company thrive in future.
Yeah this is a part of the reason I got an iPhone. Got tired of having to relearn google’s UI every year or so.
Ask him: too many interviews
Companies asking for 7-8 rounds of interviews for staff/principal/mgr level roles.

How are you handling this with a full time job?
> but they want to force other people's stuff to change as well

They aren't forcing you to do anything.

They are simply informing you that they prioritise end user experience and that they will be promoting more usable sites ahead of yours. Because inadequate spacing between control elements is a fundamental user experience issue on mobile.
The frog boiling analogy doesn't work long-term though, because humans don't live forever, and new ones keep replacing the old ones. A new crop of college kids is going to look at Chrome and say "nope"
Yeah it was a big shock to me when I crossed that timezone between Chicago and Indiana.

Look, it's a cultural thing. The reason that we have peace on the island is due to constructive ambiguity. Half the population can pretend they're Irish, the other half can pretend they're British. Anything that makes that more difficult is not a runner.
You can easily end up nested flows if e.g, your app uses auth0 and the user is a business user whose company is saml federated to Azure, for example.

You can quickly get to 3 levels if e.g. your app uses auth0, github login is supported and then the user does social login to github etc.

2 or 3 levels of federation is common.

More levels are possible which is bad if you value your sanity but I think (well, hope) rare in practice. The way you get to 4 or 5 levels is if you have organisational dysfunction on top of all this and you are forced to do your logins thru e.g. one or more fed servers owned by a different team in your company (who add even more layers of indirection).

Mostly as a relying party you will be insulated from all the complexity but if you own your oidc server and manage the brokering you will probably have to deal with a lot of edge cases.
Of course. I’d go further: it wouldn’t even make sense to try to achieve consensus until you have at least one functional technical solution. I just meant that this seems like the first step in that process. A couple of other comments seem to be suggesting this is a stupid thing because they were taking it as saying, “Problem solved!” This is a first step to open discussion on how IHL needs to be adapted to our present world, not bulletproof technical armor by itself.
Location: ME, USA but willing to work any timezone

Remote: Preferred

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies: React, JS, TS, React Native, Expo, Python MySQL, MongoDB, tRPC, Tailwind, Postgres & PostGIS, Vue

Resume: email me with your tech stack and I will promptly reply with a resume with relevant projects. I have a latex build system that compiles many resumes. Also open to part time remote work.

Email: contactme@jcharante.com
At the most basic yes, but the protocol doesn't describe what the login part is and how that works. Often it implements session using cookies, which given the state you were in previously. Maybe you wanted to embed the login page on your own site (iframe or webview), now the cookies are flagged as third party cookies and blocked in a variety of context.

Especially in an app context it becomes a minefield of half baked webview implementations, browser specific quirks, and limitations on how to call back to the host app which initiated the flow.

Other questions are how do we handle return urls, i.e. return to where we started the login flow from? there isn't a good answer in oidc, unless you use some of the more extreme flows. It becomes tricky to implement without opening yourself to open redirect attacks, which kind of voids the benefits of oidc (that you don't have to handle the complexity of the authentication).

Also there are endless variations of the oidc flow, the most common being code flow, which is pretty much what you describe. But it gets increasingly complex as you have to handle native app login (PKCE pronounced pixie). Using these flows you end up becoming as much an expert in the technology as you would've been just implementing authentication and identity yourself.
If login/Single Sign On is what you are after you are arguably better off with Central Authentication Service (CAS). It is much simpler. Unfortunately it isn't as widely known or popular.
Hey! Want to chat? Email in my bio
Very substantial, to the extent that the dataset was made up. The original data obtained from the insurer showed no effect.

The more interesting thing though is why he chose to investigate this question in the first place and why he chose to do fraud to make it seem true. The hypothesis is a very weird one and there's no reason to think it would hold. Unless that is you think of people as being child-like lumps of Playdough, so easily manipulated that trivialities like where exactly something appears on a form can yield huge behavioural differences.

That belief is the only reason you'd ever come up with such a hypothesis, and I think it's not really surprising that someone like that would engage in fraud. After all they have spent months (or years?) on trying to prove that people's levels of honesty are trivially controlled by psychologists like yourself. If you believe that's true then why wouldn't you commit fraud? After all you can easily manipulate people into not noticing it.
More and more I'm seeing headlines suffixed similar to the above "...and a lot of people aren't happy" or "...and people are upset" and it just seems to me like shoddy work by article authors.

These kinds of headlines make me assume the article is not going to bother to give a balanced or researched analysis, but instead just talk about how people are feeling about things, without necessarily quantifying anything.

It's okay to have feelings or opinions, but that's generally pretty useless to other people without some rationalization or justification as to why you have them.

I would have been far more inclined to read an article with a headline like "Google updates its Maps to look more like Apple's at the expense of ease of use".
That's because Google so far has only been dancing around and preparing to make ad blocking difficult. Until they actually do it, Chrome is fine.
A Cloud Native Primer
Some speculation in this thread about the causes of tinnitus. There are several, including hearing loss, which (as someone here points out) possibly produces tinnitus in a manner similar to how limb loss can cause phantom limb pain. The nervous system isn't like plumbing, it's a tangled web of self-adjusting feedback loops. Once an input is severed, an area of the tangled web may lose an important calibrating input. Neurons don't emit "noise signals" (or "pain signals" or whatever) they just depolarise in response to stimulation, and altered calibration alters which neurons depolarise and how often. The frequency and number of certain neurons depolarising is experienced as noise (or pain or whatever) by the conscious human they belong to.

Good talk here[0] BUT BE WARNED, I recall* that there's a high-pitched squeal during this talk as a demonstration of what tinnitus is like for done people. It's extremely nasty especially if you're wearing headphones.

Incidentally, the self-adjusting feedback loop model helps explain why things like wiggling your jaw can alter the experience of tinnitus. Due to wiring issues, sensory input from muscles and joints can get mixed in with the auditory inputs. A similar mechanism (which isn't fully understood) helps explain why, for example, people having a heart attack can experience pain in the left arm. There's nothing wrong with the arm, the normal sensory signals from the arm are mixing with those from the heart.

[0] https://youtube.com/watch?v=XGq3MXQlRJs

* Can't verify right now, trusting my memory.
The previous google maps coloring was terrible, too [1] (linked from [2]). At least you can now _see_ the minor roads on the map. It's impressive Google Maps has had terrible coloring for so long, but hopefully this is a step in fixing that.

[1] https://i.xkqr.org/gmapsvsosm.png

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31245700
thou afaik the spec does not include any provisions for direct messages (as technically it's only a group with two members), leaving the mess up to the clients.
I climb the same in the gym on lead as outside. I think this is being exaggerated in this thread or its something specific to bay area or something.
Hey, fellow Australian. We have chickens -- you heard me, chickens -- and I'd pay anything to keep them healthy. We love them. Never be ashamed to love your pet.

I don't have a lot at the moment, I 'went solo' earlier this year. But Patreons give me AU$90/month, and this month, it's yours.

Email's in my bio, send me your account details. No arguments, and no reply comment required.
This is super awesome! Thanks for sharing.
You should've migrated many months ago, if a cloud provider forces you to build your own networking or registry, you shouldn't use that cloud provider.
A demographic does not a community make.
MitID (national provider login) in Denmark, is about 2 layers of oidc in of itself (normal oidc and an oauth2). Plus whatever the consumers already have, which is often 1 or 2 as well. They're often used as a layer of abstraction which is a gross misuse of the technology.

As I mentioned previously using it for social logins by itself, is fine in most situations as they're quite mature. And IMO the best and probably intended use case of the technology and there it works quite well.
Some folks on the subreddit will stream and then post their solutions so you can see their process. I usually enjoy watching Jonathon Paulson solve a problem after I’ve got my solution submitted. He features quite high on the leaderboard each year.

https://youtu.be/rnidYOt9m2o?si=ND_FyUJTIe-dBNrT
CXL 3.1 Specification Aims for Big Topologies
In Holland too. Even if someone sues you maliciously, you still have to pay the state a fee to be heard. Otherwise the judgement will fall to the enemy party by default.

You can recuperate this cost from them when you win but you're still out of pocket for your time and the money until you manage to cash it from them which can be hard. And they can keep doing it. The system is very unfairly biased in favour of people with lots of money
Is OpenID still in use much?

I come across it less and less. To the point where I get the feeling it's just some legacy implementions that have it, but nothing more.
Not everything needs to be a peer-reviewed research paper
Same!

I had braces as a kid and something always seemed off intuitively about how they "fixed" my teeth.

Also got TMJ, recessed chin, and i've never felt my breathing has been very good afterwards, like my whole face became too narrow after removing 4 molars making me just a bit less attractive.

And after deep diving orthodontics i'm pretty fucking mad. It seems there are way better methods that keep both aesthetics and a more natural breathing - ie. a little palate expansion to make space for your teeth instead of removing teeth and having braces for years.

It's even quicker, like what the actual!

I still have retainers on, and i'm considering having them removed and having rapid palate expansion done as others in this thread recommends. As they also point out, i also have a hard time breathing correctly during sports, and have been worrying over sleep apnea.
Hmm I've had the opposite experiences. Corp labs release cool and useful stuff all the time. On the front page right now is Seamless, a very useful thing released by a corporate lab. And corps have performance evaluation and management programmes designed to encourage high performance output. And of course the competent ones manage to bring research into production regularly.

Whereas with academics, you get a paper. You might get data and code, or might not, depending on field and temperament of the researchers. If you're really lucky that data/code might actually be correct, match the paper and be usable for something, but it really depends a lot on the field. You almost certainly won't get products.
This will happen at the same time we stop being uplifted by words, or moved by them, or brought to tears by them, or fall in love over them.
I don’t think that’s entirely true. Gothic architecture was the state of the art when it arrived on the scene, as were the building techniques involved. Sure, the labor involved dedication, perhaps it was penitential for some, but no one was maximizing for labor and exertion. Labor also cost money.