skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If I say "you likely should give me 1 dollar" then in my interpretation there is a "should give" part in my response, even if there were also a "should not give" part or an "I don't know" part.

hnarn:

>> “If it’s good for you, it shouldn’t be free” is a very strange hill to die on, even if we weren’t even specifically talking about attempting to rehabilitate criminals.

up2isomorphism:

> Can you find a “shouldn’t“ part in my response?

In your case, you said "should likely cost". You took issue with the "shouldn't be free" part in hnarn's comment, so in the context of hnarn's comment, your first comment in the thread can be expressed as "should likely not be free". To me, there is a "should not" part in "should likely not be free", and I am not claiming that the "should not" part is the whole.

There's more to it though. Here's what you, up2isomorphism, wrote in full:

> There is no logic that a good thing should be free. In fact it should likely cost prisoners something if it is good for them. Just like breakfast is good for you but it is not free.

My natural interpretation is going to be one of the following:

1. up2isomorphism wants calls to cost something for prisoners (should not be free for prisoners)

2. up2isomorphism thinks that calls should cost something for prisoners regardless of which outcome up2isomorphism personally wants (should not be free for prisoners)

3. up2isomorphism is not sure about what they want or what should be the case regarding whether calls should cost something for prisoners, but they are leaning toward "should cost something" (should not be free for prisoners)

If all three of those interpretations are wrong then I'm just wrong about what you said. If so, sorry.
RETSim: Resilient and Efficient Text Similarity
http://computationalculture.net/rss

https://2019.wattenberger.com/rss

https://austinhenley.com/blog/feed.rss

https://blog.ouseful.info/feed

https://jakelazaroff.com/rss.xml

https://joshmpollock.com/feed.xml

https://lilianweng.github.io/index.xml

https://maggieappleton.com/rss.xml

https://runzhe-yang.science/feed.xml

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/feed/

https://thesephist.com/index.xml

https://topos.site/blog/index.xml

https://www.geoffreylitt.com/feed.xml
Evernote will restrict free users to 50 notes starting December 4
Are there recommended 3rd party enhancing apps for cmd-tab?

I'm looking for something that shows all windows for an app, per app, and maybe doesn't switch the app to finder when you cancel the cmd-tab
Interesting, how is writing less code cutting costs for them? Does this get back to the rumor that the board was mad at Altman for prioritizing chatgpt over money going into research/model training?
"Everybody" meaning "the normie plebs who work for a living".
Interesting tidbit from the full document:

"During the Second World War, Western European states were forced to adopt Central European Time by Hitler and Franco. After the war, this was not revoked, leaving the Western European states at a disadvantage to the Central European states due to the detrimental effects of misaligned clocks."

https://timeuse.barcelona/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/proposa...
Saw one of them at a local Tesla showroom yesterday.

They look like the Warthog vehicle from Halo with an ugly silver paintjob.
Retro.directory
What's an example of a natural key for a person, that never changes?
Culturally curious people, young and old, seem to accept that a “challenging” painting—or modern dance work, or play, or independent film—can be exciting, mind-expanding, really cool, and sort of out there precisely because it’s challenging. Why in classical contemporary music do so many people equate challenging with intimidating—or even infuriating?

Music is different to other art forms.

Not everyone likes dance, not everyone likes paintings, not everyone likes theatre, not everyone likes sculpture, not everyone likes poetry.

But EVERYONE likes music.

Its fundamental. So when its challenging music, its challenging in a more fundamental way than a painting can be challenging.
Since avocado is practically vegetable butter, it's more of a flavor complement than a flavor itself.
Thing is, this detailed knowledge is already available and much easier to acquire. There are literally books on Amazon that explain how to jury-rig firearms and bombs etc. Just to give one example: https://www.amazon.com/Improvised-Munitions-Handbook-TM-210/....

When it comes to those "detailed plans", if you actually try something like that, what you get from it is a very broad outline that is pretty much a mish-mash of common sense stuff and cultural tropes (many of which aren't true IRL). Similarly, the "list of targets" that it makes is simply the most prominent people associated with that area in public perception, not necessarily people who are actually key. All of this can be achieved just as well with a few Google searches, and the resulting plan will likely be much better for it.

I've yet to see any example where GPT would come up with something along these lines that is not trivially found on the Internet anyway.
Ukraine is not sister nation to Russia. This is old Russian propaganda, in reality, Ukraine is old European nation and Russia is Asian (just remember about mummy at center of Russian capital, and think, where at Western country exists something comparable).

Claiming Ukraine sister nation for Russia is not exact same, but similar to claim Israel sister nation to Iran, or Japan sister nation to China.
Ha, Cixin Liu! At one point I've read everything by him available in Polish, but I don't remember this specific short story. I guess I need switch to English :)

By the way, reading a "double-translation" (Chinese -> English -> Polish) is fascinating--at times it's more than obvious that what you're reading is not what the author has written, but you have no idea at all what the original concept was.
(Unlike "single" EN -> PL translations, where I can often figure out the idiom or concept that was used in the original.)
Placing in their pockets carefully selected amounts of green sheets of paper.
Their engine made the blog crash: https://i.imgur.com/AjTWQns.png
Please see my response to pipes above
>When you say "Obviously" do you mean what things are like, or do you mean what things should be like?

I mean thats what things are like based on previous Supreme Court rulings [1].

You have no privacy or expectation of privacy in prison, this includes communication with the outside world.

There as with all things of this nature some nuance to this, but bottom line telephone communications are allowed to be tapped without a warrant so long as the phone isn't given under false pretense of being unmonitored, which leads to expectation of privacy [2].

Its seems odd to be debating this since at it base prison is an act of depriving rights. You cannot have a private conversation with your family nor can you have dinner with them or go anywhere because you are in prison...

It basically in the 5th amendment: "nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law".

You have been deprived of liberty through due process of law...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_v._Palmer

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy_(United...
That's absolutely not a huge overhead, quite the contrary it has many benefits.

We do the same at Shopify, and running off the edge allow to catch bug much sooner and identify them much easier.

It also very significantly cuts down on maintenance cost because we no longer have to work-around bugs, we can fix them upstream and so a small update.

As for you pointing at the Rails 5 migration taking a very long time, it's true that certain major migrations were a pain this one in particular, but it's because a major API had been removed (attr_protected). We (both Shopify and GitHub) work with the edge also in part to make sure the community won't have to suffer this kind of harsh migrations ever again.

All this to say you are blowing things out of proportion. The Ruby and Rails teams at Shopify and GitHub are not an overhead, they pay for themselves, and any tech company as large as Shopify or GitHub you will find major contributors to the stack they use. e.g. There used to be a JVM team at Twitter (half smaller than Shopify even at peak).
> Consumers always have the opportunity to switch.

For that, there needs to be an alternative option. Just look at Walmart and how they destroy small food stores in a massive radius around them as no small retailer can compete with their scale.
You can, you have to use firefox's built in screenshot tool- not the system-wide one.
You can turn off cats too [0], so it's not just about chickens not being that bright.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9TmmF79Rw0
Witch? It's been a while since I used it.
Pizza Wars: The Exorcism of Papa John's [YouTube]
Assuming you are referring to the social contract, I refer you again to the definition of "social"; corporations are not part of it, any more than a scorpion is, or a calculator. Could you answer some of these questions so I can understand your position better?

> What implicit rule is it that you think applies to purchasing stuff?

> This ethical agreement not to pirate stuff, is this something that pirates can refuse?
Interesting distinction you make between experimental composers and those with _some_ desire to appeal to a broader audience, or at least some conventional sensibility. I think the same applies to contemporary music - while I personally find great pleasure in the moment listening to free jazz, noise, and ambient music, it is ephemeral and soon forgotten. The music that I find memorable, that truly haunts me, has elements of the experimental, but is still fundamentally melodic. My Bloody Valentine might be a good example.
That's basically the entire history of artificial intelligence. We used to think a robot capable of vacuuming your house would be "AI" and now roombas just bounce around the floor semi-randomly. The task didn't change, our respect for it did.

At this point the definition of AI is practically "Something computers can't do yet", though I'm partial to its corollary "Any sufficiently misunderstood algorithm is AI."
Oh and also for Polish speakers - there is an absolutely fantastic "superproduction" audiobook of it, with background music, sound effects and famous actors narrating, it's a treat, I very highly recommend it.

https://audioteka.com/pl/audiobook/niezwyciezony
At this time of year?

There's a lot of snowbird-targeted stuff available in Arizona, Florida, Alabama, Texas, etc. You rent a house or condo for a few months. There are plenty of little towns on the ocean where the beach, grocery store, and public library are all within walking distance. Take an Uber from the airport and spend the next 2-3 months without ever touching a car; without ever having any footwear besides flip flops.
How is this different from the Sunray, which had central compute power, persistent and portable sessions and user identification via smart cards?

Old ideas come around. Most installations were on a LAN, though the goal was probably for WAN, give or take network speeds.

I don't know enough about cloud computing, especially Amazon's version, to say, but sun rays are apparently collector's items with no support, except legacy or home brew software. It is/was more frame buffering than VNC, or X.

Corrections are welcome, as it was a very long time ago.
But you may have
Google UniSim for efficient similarity computation
What do you believe the causation is then?

If light isn't what impacts it, then it seems like the summer should have more crime than winter. Kids are out of school and there is no snow and cold.
Sure, but the act only applies if you are as powerful as Google (Section 6: Application), and since they are the primary target the scope needs to be broad because Google can be counted on producing the most bad faith reading of any law to try to escape paying for the practice of scraping content from journalists in an effort to keep the traffic on their own pages.
It looks super cool! Too bad there isn't an English language version.
I welcome it for the opposite reason. The few powerful families that control the news cartel in Canada need less reach.
I'm a little biased, but I do think this is kind of amazing, especially as it shows that you can now use a language (Scheme) that occupies some of the same semantic niche as original Javascript, and have it compete in terms of speed and DOM access with the browser-specific language of the Web. Also that it lets you start constructing some of the innovations that were built up from basic Javascript, like DOM-diffing, in a simpler and potentially more rigorous way.

One thing though, even though I am getting better at Lispy languages, is that I still feel a little intimidated trying to visually parse a Lisp fragment and understand the flow-of-control compared to, say, Python. I'm not sure that I need anything more than more practice, but maybe it would also be good to have some "training wheels" to train my visual cortext to map Lisps' indentation and parentheses and iteration structures to whatever part of my brain groks control-of-flow
Up there with the "I can't send an email over 500 miles" story

https://web.mit.edu/jemorris/humor/500-miles
This almost feels like a false flag of proposing the most disruptive plan possible such that it couldn't possibly be approved, haha.

Splitting & re-groupings are almost arbitrary and have no consideration for politics, business and culture.

Ireland & N. Ireland in different TZ?
France & Corsica in different TZ?
Pushing Ireland & Portugal into their own TZ and calling it Azores time?
Bringing UK into alignment with Spain/France/Belgium/Netherlands, but pushing Germany/Italy/Switzerland into alignment with Eastern Europe countries but out of alignment with Western Europe?

A 2 step process by which some countries change TZ twice?
Would love to write the code for that mess.
"I don't know...", nah, it's more like you don't care.
Even if that's the case, it's still better to get the people who want to get off the street into housing. Then you can move onto specific solutions for other people.
> Zero arguments for any claim.

You mean aside from the list of citations?
More mass inside the wheel increases unsprung weight and worsens some ride/suspension characteristics of a vehicle-

that being said the tradeoff might not be too bad in this case.
I hope there will be support for current Sonoma versions soon
Don't AI's eat other AI's? the marlins and the trout!
TSMC manufactures for Nvidia.

https://www.networkworld.com/article/972306/intel-looking-li....
You're the one who turned "not a gun, just a flare" into "shooting a flare gun" after he corrected it. His post is more trustworthy than yours.
I was hoping this would be more about encouraging people to listen to music that is generally outside of what they usually listen to. For some this would be jazz, others heavy metal, or even country music (which many profess to hate).
Next up: Canadian news agencies forcing their employees to click on their links a thousand times per day to prop up this new and lucrative revenue stream.
I cover it a bit in the blog post, but unless you have a really long context length (like 32k+), your primary computational cost doesn't come from attention but rather from loading your weights from VRAM into registers.

I mean, practically speaking, completions from say, ChatGPT or Claude take seconds to finish :)
I'm also from the US and I've spent quite a lot of time listening to people speaking, specifically listening for how they realize phonemes. Your experience doesn't at all align with mine, either what I heard or what I've read about dialect variation in the US.

Anyway, sorry to have upset you.
If you were using the free ChatGPT then you were playing with an obsolete LLM. GPT-4 has an estimated 10x parameters of GPT-3.5 (1.8 trillion vs 175 billion), and other improvements.
interesting, what does the local model do?
Framework Is Not Your Religion – Human Identity Doesn't Run on JavaScript
We still had local variables, for internal calculations and the likes of course, but most of the interface was done through globals. (btw, it was indeed C)

Perhaps what is missing is that the way we did testing was a bit unconventional. That is, we didn't have unit tests. Instead, we did it all through integration testing on the real hardware. And setting these globals was how we got coverage. We also had a particularly good traceability, so we knew exactly which tests to run after each code change and get our coverage back, which made up for the fact that we couldn't tests the functions independently.

It was a rather successful project, we got audited a couple of times with only minor issues. It certainly made testing more difficult, but we in exchange, it was much closer to real life conditions.

Note that it was a while ago, newer project use a more modern approach with a continuous integration platform, unit tests with an emulator, etc... We also use less C, instead using industry specific tools and certified code generators, multitasking RTOSes, etc... With C and ADA for the inner and legacy parts.
Referrer is basically optional though, you can specify a link to have no referrer : `<a href="example.com" rel="noreferrer">link</a>` , among other ways.

It's true that the links only increase the revenue/traffic to their website though, so they should really be supporting the referrers rather than blocking them.
But smaller news outlets are not part of this cartel.
This is what I went for after deciding against a web stack due to confusion over where even to start with it considering the ridiculous amount of competing frameworks. I also wanted a local first approach and didn't want to maintain a website. Happy with my choice though dart/flutter seem to be universally hated on HN.
I really enjoy that book but it always makes me....sad? Nostalgic? I always feel bad for the protagonist, more so than for protagonists in his other stories. I should re-read this one I think.
Sinnead O'Connor give him a few years more by the uncommon procedure of send him to the jail
I use AltTab [0] for this. I find using a mac without it horrendous.

[0]: https://alt-tab-macos.netlify.app/
Well... humans have different mental "spaces" (not intended as a technical term).

Let's say I'm deep in a coding problem. A co-worker comes by and says "How did your team do in the game yesterday?". I say, "Um, uh... sorry, my head's not there right now." It takes us time to swap between mental "spaces".

So, if I have an AGI (defined as having a trained model for almost everything, even if that turns out to be a large number of different models), if it has to load the right model before it can reason on that topic, then that's pretty human-like. (As long as it can figure out which model to load...)

The one thing missing is that (at least some) humans can figure out linkages between different mental "spaces", to turn them into a more coherent holistic mental space, even if they don't have (all of) each space at front-of-mind at any moment. I'm not sure if this flavor of an AGI could do that - could see the connections between different models.
I was suffering from the paradox of choice lately when choosing a framework for a long-term company project. Nowadays it's like thinking of holiday gifts for distant relatives… There's no clear winner, yet there are lots of people with strong opinions out there. They put stickers on their laptops and preach as if {{insert framework here}} was their life. That's when I realized — your framework is not your religion.

TL;DR: Picked React because it's the biggest and most stable cult, but you should experiment with other cults as well because it's about the ideas, not the specific frameworks.

---

Hope this can help someone out there who is also pulling the lever of the framework roulette and has to make a decision.
For Pi Zero & ZeroW & Zero2W, Pi 1 models A & A+ & B & B+, Pi 2 model B, Pi 3 models A+ & B & B+, Pi 4 model B, Pi 400 rev 1.0, Compute Module 1 & 3 & 3+.

https://www.riscosopen.org/content/downloads/raspberry-pi
>there is no version of this story where the board doesn’t do whatever they hell they want, and no version where “making the case” doesn’t result in even more chaos.

The failure to make their case is PRECISELY why the board was ultimately unable to do what the hell they wanted: remove Sam Altman. As it turned out, his presence was important enough to the employees that the usual corporate playbook of "do whatever the hell we want and only disclose what is legally required" backfired spectacularly.

If your thesis was correct, Sam would not be there right now.
I was using the updated docs the other day, awesome updates!
I think the idea that the person with the specialised knowledge of how to make hot sauce is the technical founder is an interesting point, but I think in YC/HN contexts it's usually considered to mean "engineer"; even in cases like accounting software where the founder who doesn't write software's specialised knowledge of the field is at least as critical as their partner's ability to convert that to code, the latter founder is the only "technical" one. Although tbh I don't think accountants or lawyers get offended by the insinuation they're the "non-technical founder".
The avocados we eat are all clones, right? The reason I ask is, it seems to me that avocado sellers ought to be prominently displaying the variety, but in my experience they don't.
> It fits my needs well enough without requiring disabling SIP.

This is not a requirement for yabai.
Perhaps we were too greedy (or naive?) with the peace dividend. I'm reminded of how slashing spending on R&D always looks wise for the first few years, and then it is calamitous. I think this war is really those kinds of problems coming home to roost. A dysfunctional klepto-state is managing to out-produce the western world in materially relevant ways.
Conditioning Is Grouping By
Council and Commission can work on whatever they want - if it's not ultimately approved by an EP plenary, it's not a Directive. Occasionally some governments will go ahead and introduce laws that they tried and failed to go past the EP, but that's just national politics in action.
Because many people for some reason don't strongly value the derivative of the solar inclination being zero and a local maximum within at most slightly over 30 minutes[1] of an analogue watch having the hands both vertical, on the few days a year that the equation of time is zero.

[1] Because the equation of time might not be exactly zero at noon, the Earth isn't a perfect ovoid and you could be up to 7.5 degrees of longitude from the centre of an hour-wide timezone, even if you drew them perfectly straight down the globe with no regards to national borders.
That's not the hard part about building a working airplane, though...
By whom are laws enforced, and by whom are those people appointed and to whom do they answer?

Or, to take another angle, why don't the prohibitions in FISA effectively stop the government from abusing foreign intelligence apparatus for domestic spying?
> * Emotionally affecting - if the work is moving in some way, or you get something from it, then it has value

I suppose I fall into this camp and why I find most AI generated images nothing even close to art. Art is truth, art is a communication between the artist and the viewer, good artists do things for their personal reasons. Generative AI is cold and unfeeling. If anything, artists that use AI should embrace that and stop trying to make so many airbrushed, Penthouse style renderings that try to mimic so much that has happened before. I mean you have the power of Gandalf, so why are you making images that look like something that's been done thousands of times over? Otherwise it's content and illustration, which both have their place in the world.

Looking at the spiral image thumbnails used in the article look like something that an artist would have done 100 years ago. I don't see an artist there. I see a content creator. If they were painted by hand I would say the same thing, but be slightly more impressed by the craft of it.