skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's even easier with the all-in-one (aio) solution. Upgrades via a simple UI, automatic Borg Backups, etc.
I run this on hetzner cloud with one storagebox for the files and one storagebox for the backups. Runs nicely, gets updates, and as the storageboxes do automatic snapshots, I have double backups.
That is Chromium doing it, and yes, it is using mmap to create a very large, (almost certainly) contiguous range of memory. Many runtimes do this, because it's useful (on 64-bit systems) to create a ridiculously large virtually mapped address space and then only commit small parts of it over time as needed, because it makes memory allocation simpler in several ways; notably it means you don't have to worry about allocating new address spaces when simply allocating memory, and it means answering things like "Is this a heap object?" is easier.
When you reach the effective pay/level ceiling you can also decide to play along and wreck a little havoc by for example letting the asshole say too much in meetings or on corporate parties. It's a fine balancing game, where your goal is to create entertainment without negatively impacting your own emotional state. Most people are actually at some sort of a ceiling, for example due to inability or unwillingness to reach higher ("do politics") or to move to a more profitable location/company, even if they don't realize it.
I read it in a different way than you. Now, we can express our feelings not just to family and friends, but to the whole planet as well as consuming theirs. What might have been just a local conversation now feels like the weight of the world.
What changed is EU law. A free version which requires tracking is (AIUI) illegal now.

I guess this case will clarify whether that's true.
I use electrical tape to tape over bright LEDs, especially ones in the bedroom. The light generally will still be visible and you can add layers to get the brightness you desire. The tape also comes in many colors so you can match the device you are fixing.
There were two things that pushed me to the SLZB-06:

* deCONZ was slow to get new device support and I had purchased some devices that weren't supported (Ikea STARKVIND) at the time. I think this has been improved since I last used it though.

* The SLZB-06 can be powered by PoE which gives it a lot more flexibility than anything connected by USB. Also, since it's not USB-connected, it's a lot easier to deal with (no need to figure out USB passthrough, etc).
It's not shortsighted. It's just a decision driven by some Italian lobbies (meat industry), scared about this innovation where they feel threatened. For the same reason they managed to forbid the use of some Italian meat-words applied to plant-based meat.
There is a principle here that I can't see mentioned and that is how easy it is to discard something as a cause of a problem because it seems so minor, so routine (i.e. removing the "spare" multimeter) and therefore getting blinkered on what is going on.

There are more than a few times where I am scratching my head as to "how could my change have possibly broken this" only to remember a couple of hours later that I had made another change somewhere, or rebooted, or changed a config file temporarily.

I guess it just says that we all need to log everything we do, including removing spare multi-meters, so that by looking over the list we can remember these things.
But the technical and developer layer does not operate independent of the leadership, planning, and prioritization layers, right? They don't strike me as separable.
The flicker was not that bad on CRT TV's of the time (which had very long phosphor decay times). I still own a few 2600s and a lot of games including Pac Mac which is of course not the same as the arcade version but more of a simplified version requiring a bit of imagination.
Which isn't surprising coming from a machine with 128 bytes of memory and no framebuffer ;)

Those arcade games didn't improve by themselves though, you needed better hardware for better games. While Atari didn't do themselves a favour by trying to squeeze every penny from the 2600 they did build successors. But by then the economy tanked and the competition from Nintendo started.
He had no choice but to state the motivation he stated.
US Attorney Charges Indian National with Plot to Assassinate US Citizen in NYC
>Also, sometimes bad actors deserve cruelty.

So you do recognize a substantive difference between a justice system based on the concept of moral responsibility and one without. But those of us that are against cruelty are motivated to look more closely at the justifications for it. Hence we get arguments like the one I presented.
Deno Cron
If I were a DBA, I'd yell a lot too. When the straw breaks the camel's back, the camel lands on the DBA.
I think they are doing the right thing by waiting out.

They will reap a series of huge benefits:

- powertrain and battery technologies will get cheaper and more reliable

- they will do much more money for the foreseeable future by focusing on a very cost efficient market they already do well in

- they minimize the investments by having to experiment less

I think that many companies like Mercedes and Ford and Volkswagen FOMOed into a premature EV transition blinded by the growth and margins and Tesla. They are now finding out that EV demand isn't as high as they thought and that even Tesla's growth and margins is collapsing (and obviously will never recover with more competition coming).
PPLX Online LLMs
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but: no, you can allocate terabytes of address space on modern 64-bit Linux on a machine with only 8GB of RAM with overcommit. Try it; you can allocate 2^46 bytes of space (~= 100TB) today, with no problem. There is no limit to the allocation space in an overcommit system; there is only a limit to the actual working set, which is very different.
I've created github page for my house. Waiting for PRs now.
Good question. US defamation law is fairly weak[0], but all the usual exceptions that make it weak wouldn't apply. e.g. "truth is an absolute defense against defamation" doesn't apply because AI generated or photoshopped nonconsenual porn is fake. I'm not a lawyer, but I think a defamation case would at least survive a motion to dismiss.

[0] Which, to be clear, is a good thing. Strong defamation law is a generalized censorship primitive.
According to the Wikipedia article, much of the debt BB&B acquired was to buy back stock.
Reader view on macOS/Safari worked fine for me.
Note that MIDI is a lot more effective when it comes to ML/AI, since it's multiple orders of magnitude less data. Daniel D. Johnson's (formerly known as Hexahedria, hired by Google Brain) model biaxial-rnn-music-composition is from 2015, requires very few resources for training or inference, and still delivers compelling, SOTA-or-close results wrt. improvising ("noodling") classical piano. https://github.com/danieldjohnson/biaxial-rnn-music-composit... You may also want to check out user kpister's recent port to Python 3.x and aesara: https://github.com/kpister/biaxial-rnn-music-composition (Hat tip: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30328593 ).

Music generation from notation is pretty much the MINST toy-scale equivalent for sequence/language learning models, it's surprising that there's so little attention being paid to it despite how easy it to get started with.
> he (and it usually is a he) is your professor

This has not been true for some years now:
https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61
The thing is, I can't find any part of that ruling[0] that even remotely matches Meta's claim. Can somebody point it out for me?

And it makes sense that there is nothing like that in there. Subscriptions were totally irrelevant to the actual questions that the CJEU was asked to rule on in that case (which was e.g. a claim by the German competition authorities that it was impossible for anyone to freely consent to tracking by Meta due to them having a dominant market position, and a counter-claim that the competition authorities did not even have jurisdiction over a GDPR case).

[0] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...
Cameron denied that and the two people who made the claim admit their only source was a single anonymous member of parliament.
But, because it's so funny and they knew Cameron wouldn't sue, it didn't matter to them whether or not it was true.
> we need to accept the absurdity of hating any person for anything they’ve done

What does the author mean by that? People have no control of hating others or any other thoughts.

It sounds like author is guilt-tripping readers into believing people can't be blamed for what they do.
Show HN: Have AI review your Techstars application to help you get in
Have AI review your Techstars application and improve your chances of getting in!

Take your Techstars application to the next level using Wisary Assistant to review and provide feedback on many critical areas of the application.

* Highlight critical mistakes in your application
* Improve wording to increase your chances of getting in
* Eliminate concerns reviewers of your application will have ahead of time
* Add information requested by the assistant to strengthen your application

...and much more!

The Wisary Techstars Application Assistant is curated and specialized in the Techstars application review to improve your odds of getting accepted with the strongest possible application!
It's true, car dealers "can't sell" EVs. Not because people don't want EVs, but because dealers either don't want to sell them, or don't know how to sell them.

I've owned 3 EVs since 2016 and I've been to franchise dealerships each time. I've been to dealerships both with and without dedicated or specially trained EV sales reps.

Sales reps who've not had any specific training on selling EVs, working in dealerships with no dedicated EV showroom space are _terrible_ at selling EVs IME. At best they're disinterested in making a sale, at worst they actively discourage you with all the common EV related FUD.

Showrooms with dedicated space to showcase EV product offerings, information about EVs and which have marketing material actively incentivising the benefits of an EV, also have sales reps who are knowledgeable, helpful, and actively seeking to close a sale.
Bob Colwell is awesome! I remember seeing an online talk he made... must be 25 years ago now. He talked about the development of the out of order architecture at Intel, and in general about engineering. He has some really fun anecdotes!

Honestly he is probably a big reason I switched majors from biotech over to computers, robotics and engineering in general... I even remember sending him an email about it and got a response back, wishing me good luck :) Sadly I can't find the email now, it was pre-gmail.

Some really good columns that he wrote for "Computer" magazine: https://people.computing.clemson.edu/~mark/330/colwell/at_ra...

Highly recommend his book "Pentium Chronicles"

Edit: found the talk! It was ee380 at Stanford 2003/2004. Sadly the video links seem to be broken... https://web.stanford.edu/class/ee380/ay0304.html
Yeah that seems like a likely setup to me!
I suspect there’s no good reason to upgrade from M2 to M3. Nonetheless, I did it, and if anyone else is in the same boat I was, I encourage you to look at the trade-in values that Apple is offering for M2 MBPs. They offered something like 90+% of the out-of-pocket price I paid for the M2 six months ago, so it was basically a wash on the trade.

I don’t in any way “need” an M3 but this was a particular painful turn of the ever-rotating upgrade wheel, and the generous valuation on the trade certainly took some of the sting off.
I didn't know that LLMs work like that, and frankly I'm still respectfully skeptical. If I train a model with enough prompt-wise malicious inputs in its dataset, this model may generate them back, that's obvious. But. Are you saying that these generations can somehow (how?) feed back into its own prompt and then it malfunctions? Or did I get it wrong?

One scenario I can imagine myself is that a model could generate <...bad...> into a chat, and then when the user notices it and responds with something like "that's not what I asked for, <reiterates the question>", then there's now malicious text in the chat history (context window) that could affect future generations on <the question> and put dangerous data into a seemingly innocent link. Is this what you meant?
Well for starters, I would like to think that responding to you counts as addressing "the problem at hand", unless you mean to say you were also not addressing it, and I joined you in being unresponsive by choosing to reply to you. But I would like to give you more credit than that.

Regarding the notion of a canon, it's good to have a notion of history of conceptual change that identifies a series of major advances that we hold up as exhibiting our highest standards. I would say though that I completely agree with the premise advanced by this article that it would benefit from establishing some consistent norms. I can't see the full paper, but it seems to be building out a great theory on how this happens in philosophy of science, and I think the history of Kuhn and post-Kuhn philosophers of science have exhibited how messy and all-over-the-map it can be and how, perhaps culminating in its most extreme expression in Against Method. Which I think testifies to the need for building out the kind of norms that the paper is advocating.
psql is good but how do you manage long multi line queries and saved collections of queries to reuse? or connections to multiple databases?
This isn’t complicated. People want self determination. To live their lives as they see fit.

Work, inherently, requires people to give that up. If we had a utopian society where work was optional, how many would do their current jobs voluntarily? Almost nil.

What’s happening now, and is very very good, is people are realizing their power. They’re less afraid to demand more compensation, to unionize, or to quit. They’re setting an example for others. They’re using the internet to show the way. The pandemic opened the door a little bit, and now our foot is in the crack. The door is never closing.
All true, but the same apples to the M1 to M3 comparison, and the architectural differences are likely even greater than between the M2 and M3.
> Or one could just uninstall Facebook, delete one's account, and walk away from the whole mess.

I like this idea.
Features I Wish I Included in My MVP
I dont think it avoids the moral judgement, it just obfuscates it, or replaces it with a comparable concept.

You dont need free will to rationally have disgust, indignation, and retribution. You can rationally punish someone who contracted a contagious illness.

All you need for rationale is switching from the idea that someone makes bad choices to the idea that someone is a bad machine.
Right. And let's not forget that any such 100-line program would not be—in any meaningful sense—written by anybody, but instead predetermined by the initial conditions of the universe 14 billion years ago, give or take. Something bounced off something else (as it had to) and, presto, these particular tokens were arranged just so. Remember, of course, that the same initial position and velocity of particles during the big bang implied the inevitable and precise creation of the compiler, the processor, the memory, the keyboard, the particular arrangement of letters on that keyboard (and the language they represent, which itself does not communicate anything that wasn't ordained before the first stars coalesced), as well as the office chair you sat in—with its 7 points of articulation!—and the Homer Simpson coffee mug that nobody decided to fill with coffee, but which was in all important ways filled with coffee by the universe itself. At no point did anything ever happen except by predetermined interactions, and the initial conditions of the universe caused all of human history to play out exactly as it did. I think we can all agree that that just makes intuitive sense, and isn't preposterous at all. In fact, we have to.
What's the old saying?

You don't have to run faster than a bear, just faster than the person next to you.
I saw this before actually! Pretty cool repo :)
Your last paragraph is so huge. There's a ton of "well we know the trick" stuff coming from donors and donor organizations that lead to just obviously broken approaches. One Child One Laptop is a great example.

This is one reason why I like direct financial gifts. People receiving the money know what they need the most.
In case you are not aware, apostolic churches do not and have never claimed to draw their teaching authority from the bible. It is true that sola scriptura groups are in a pickle here.
Rainloop is a good alternative IMO
I think this may be wise given the rapid pace of development that batteries are still undergoing. Pretty hard to create a design around a battery when you dont even know what chemistry you are working with. And there is a bit of a revolution happening with lower carbon fuels, even though it sucks compared to pure electric, and it still has a lot of work to make sense(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpEB6hCpIGM). I was under the impression though that this was a potentially good area for hydrogen fuel? can anyone confirm?

Edit: Here is the video i was looking for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpEB6hCpIGM

Summary: Jet-A/A1 kerosene is the current mass fuel for passenger planes in the United States, and its dirty, but the most economical.

Simple biofuels have all sorts of chemical drawbacks that make them a nonstarter. super processed biofuels however, can match the properties of JetA/A1 very closely, but they are very recently developed. Unfortunately, right now, they cost so much energy to develop that they arent environmentally friendly at all, even disregarding the rainforest destruction it provokes (palm oils).

hydrogen may work some day but production is still too costly and it requires a complete redesign of planes and engines, unlike super processed biofuels. it also requires expensive and sensitive cryogenic storage to make energy density work.

e-fuels, or hydrogen composite fuel (liquid methanol, etc) may solve all of the above problems and grow as a more economical option rapidly, but they will still not match the cost performance of JetA/A1 which means increased costs for travel/shipping are unavoidable.

electric is an option with the most uncertainty, but there are already niche use cases that already make more sense than other options. mostly small craft and short flight distances. but that does take a decent chunk out of our current consumption. if battery chemistry keeps moving forward at a rapid pace, this could legitimately replace a lot of the air travel we do, but until those batteries are already coming out of factories, its difficult to design around.

so here we are.
I'm going to interpret the title as "You have _less_ free-will than you may think". Things are rarely 100% one way or another, unless you're on social media.
I interpreted it as snarking on the current state of affairs. By and large, in the US the point of the prison system is *not* rehabilitation or providing benefit to society. It's about lining the pockets of wealthy people and keeping the downtrodden in that position. And that sucks, but stating it as a matter of fact doesn't mean one supports it.
> Yet still we don't blame them for such blatant lies.

I mean, I for one blame them for blatant lies. And it sounds like others do too, given the fact the conference has been shut down.
Right but it’s a weird feeling, doing all this work and have this person own large stake in it
jemalloc was Rust's default allocator till 2018.

https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/jemalloc-was-just-removed-...
I disagree mostly.

If they are that obviously disagreeable, others likely also have problems with them and they are just a difficult person to work with. Leadership that allows such a person to run unabated (ie: no corrective action nor termination) is ineffective and weak in my opinion, either purposefully or accidentally.

If you find someone that is strongly disagreeable indefinitely and others in the company voice the same sentiment for long periods, you should leave as soon as possible because somewhere in the chain, there are problems no one is addressing and it will only get worse especially if it is a young company. People like this are a cancer and it will never result in anything good.

If you find someone that is strongly disagreeable and others don't say the same (or even worse, the opposite!), there is a good chance _you_ are the problem and should check-in with yourself why.

People don't rampage through life unchecked for no reason. There is a reason and both you can near immediately fix. Kow-towing to others and just dealing with it isn't solving the problem, it could even be making the situation worse.
But if I’m a retributivist, why do I want to be less efficient with money and also make MY life worse, just to inflict more punishment on some prisoner? That just genuinely makes no sense. I can understand the logic of wanting to punish them for the sake of it, but I would also want to be efficient about it, and not make my life worse in the process.
There are 3 situations

1. No one is being an asshole, it's a real misunderstanding or difference of opinion. The article basically helps you in this circumstance. It's rare.

2. The other party is an asshole. They should be fired. If no one gets along with them this is probably true.

3. You are an asshole. You should be fired. If you find yourself always working with people you think are assholes this is probably true.

Figure out if it's 1,2, or 3 first
Choosing the Right Tool: A Detailed Traefik vs. Nginx Showdown
Amazon cloud boss takes swipe at Microsoft over OpenAI turmoil
Are you the thing that decides between courses of action you will take given a situation? If you are, then you have free will. If you aren't then you don't. In practice, there is no one who doesn't identify with it, except maybe schizophrenics. So, the choice is yours.
Exceeding a speed limit by a few mph will not land you in jail or cost you thousands of dollars in fines in most parts of the world.
Using torrents is some kind of reverse lottery: download an illegally shared movie (or for that matter: use a photo you grabbed from a random site on your own website) and get the chance to lose an annual income.
Football manager (I'm quite deep in a save and have led them to 2066)

Civilization is the classic if you can fight off long enough in the end game on decent difficulty, although I play on easy so I discover nukes by about the 1700’s
Maybe try to remember the reasons you originally wanted to start a company with them? I'm curious what those reasons are if this person is incompetent and trying to start a company. Did they bring the idea AND the money?

I'm in a related situation. I've been working for a company for years, and the owner is incompetent in most areas except sales. His original company is over a decade old but now almost dead. Somehow he's still getting investor money and for the past 5 years has been trying to start a new business, but keeps pivoting before anything is actually released to the public. I'm the main dev and it's getting frustrating, but I know without me he definitely won't get anywhere. And the pay vs time invested is pretty good at the moment.