skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is perhaps why many frame this debate around what free will is: "free will is an illusion" vs "free will does not exist." It bends away from fatalism. The science and theory behind determinism seems plausible to me, nonetheless I feel like I can make decisions in my life. That's what matters, and that's what will keep society from unraveling were this to be truly realized by the masses.
I can imagine what it’s like Not being fun, I can’t imagine what it’s like to kill myself just because I’m not having fun.
No, this is naive. See game theory, the "tit-for-tat" problem. Can't empower agents who would later betray you, or society would stop functioning. Punishing those to exploit the system is in the interest of everyone else.

Would you set free a raper or killer (it wasn't his fault, it's society, culture, etc) and let the next victim pay the price?
> Is it crazy to not believe that he actually believes this?

It's merely misguided. There is no belief so atrociously stupid that someone, somewhere doesn't sincerely believe it. In fact, I am quite certain that for any given belief, at least three people believe it, and if we are so unfortunate as for them to discover each other, they'll form a stupidity cult and attract others to the thing.

If you fail to understand this, you are in great peril. Such people will attempt to re-engineer society itself so as to make their stupidity foundational the civilization you are forced by circumstances to live within. They will do so with the passion of zealots and the blissful unawareness of imbeciles, and if you are to have any chance at all of stopping them, you have to do so quickly. On this particular inanity, we are certainly too late.
It doesn't have to be depression, it could be very rationale. If my mind goes, why would I care how long my body survives after?
Microdosing psychedelics could benefit people with ADHD
I am in chronic pain, chronic mental pain. Should I kill myself?
The Cirrus SR-22 (the best selling general aviation plane every year since 2003) has mechanically linked side sticks. They aren't fly by wire like the Airbus but it shows they can be linked without a complex motor system.
> Still, it is likely that the viking ethos does draw from the culture they inherited from the Yamnaya

This is intuitive to me as well. But my question is, are there evidences in support, eg their language, mythology or "pots" likely being more closer to yamnaya / PIE than others?
I don't think so, but it's difficult to find an actual reference. For sure it does overcommit like crazy. Here's an output from my mac:

% ps aux | sort -k5 -rh | head -1

xxxxxxxx 88273 1.2 0.9 1597482768 316064 ?? S 4:07PM 35:09.71 /Applications/Slack.app/Contents/Frameworks/Slack Helper (Renderer).app/...

Since ps displays vsz column in KiB, 1597482768 corresponds to 1TB+.
>they tasted just like the ones from Mc Donalds.

To each his own. I don't like that at all, knowing what this taste is the result of.

As for spices: I do use spices and herbs, but not hot ones. The "piquant" ones tend to ruin your taste over time. Spices make a good trick but it's better to learn to cook with good good. Reducing meat from a diet can free so budget to buy what would otherwise be expensive ingredients. There are less popular than chicken nuggets but they are definitely more nutritious and more environment friendly.

I'm part of a local co-op (called AMAP in French) so it's easy for to get high quality, and very varied foods: we select a few farmers who will work all year round for the coop members, and they grow our vegetables and fruits (but also make wholegrain bread, eggs, etc). Most of my foods comes from these family farmers. It's 100% local (the farm is right outside the city), organic, cheaper than retail goods, freshly produced. Plants are usually harvested weekly, in the afternoon just for our evening distribution.
While "avoiding criminals" _is_ a solution, it's not one which is suitable for a country or region that calls itself "civilised".
I don't know if it has a specific meaning. There have been multiple forks:

paperless (https://github.com/the-paperless-project/paperless)
->
paperless-ng (https://github.com/jonaswinkler/paperless-ng/)
->
paperless-ngx (https://github.com/paperless-ngx/paperless-ngx/)
I regret starting to read this. Skimming ahead, it gets crazy.
I'm glad it's working well for gou.

What are the advantages of that over a Conbee?

My Zigbee network is completely flawless and the Conbee picks up pretty much any device.

Pretty hard to improve on that I'd think.
It IS illegal in the EU under the GDPR. People need to *voluntarily* consent to give access to their data. What Meta did, which is "give access to your data or you need to pay to access the site" is not by any stretch "freely given".

Source, for example https://gdpr-info.eu/issues/consent/#:~:text=Consent%20must%....

or

https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-re...

or

https://www.bfdi.bund.de/EN/Buerger/Inhalte/Allgemein/Datens...
But the judgment of character is central to how our society conceptualizes its response to bad actors, and it informs the space of justifiable responses towards bad actors, that it matters whether the judgment of character is based on fact.

Moral responsibility as we currently conceive of it has been responsible for untold atrocities throughout human history. The problem is the concept has blanket justificatory power. People who are deemed to be moral degenerates by society become authorized targets of heinous behavior with a clear conscience of the perpetrators. Undermining the concept of moral responsibility breaks the connection between a bad actor and cruelty towards them. Taking a quarantine model limits the space of allowable behaviors; heinous reactions no longer have justification. So while the result can be similar in broad strokes between the two systems, the details can end up being very different.
And I say in turn, it's a skill issue if your "website" or "app" could be made by a GPT in a few minutes. Is what you're doing actually valuable, then? It consistently fails to solve my problems.
I hear you don't want to go (Cloud)Native else you'd be using MusicYAML now.
It's about making misuse difficult.

Rust doesn't actually restrict much. It would take looking at lots of details, but my impression is that it's less restrictive than C.
Rest assured I'm in no way proposing an "unconditional global skepticism of any and all knowledge" - just a sound skepticism which questions our assumptions.

There is no doubt room for a nuanced discussion about Kuhn and paradigms here. I admittedly painted with a broad brush. But your objections doesn't seem to directly address the problem at hand: would you say that there is indeed a use for a "canon" in history and philosophy of science? and how would you in that case avoid the problem of paradigms that necessarily would tend to inform such a canon?
You have just proved the opposite. For a 100 lines program, you will never even know whether it will terminate or not, and what would be the result of computation.

Free will is the complete opaqueness of the thought process to you, where the only way to get the result is to run the program.
> which is odd in an engineering environment where having correct and efficient solutions would be the most important.

Whenever people have to work together as a team, social skills become at least as important as technical ones.

That's why whenever I've interviewed job applicants, my main concern is "how well will they function on the team", not "do they have all the necessary skills". Assuming that someone is smart and likes to learn, skills can be taught. Fitting in on a team, though, cannot.
Generally people like to complain; if everyone says something is bad, usually it is, and if most people aren't complaining, but consistent voices do, then it's an indicator of individual rather than widespread issues.
I guess a person with low agreeableness will be more likely to "point out errors in the socially agreed convention". And therefore be seen as both brilliant, and as jerks.
> How often do you fall into the trap of “this is so obvious, I shouldn’t have to explain it to you”?

Great question, when teaching I try to couch this with "you may know this already, but I'm going to explicitly explain it for clarity."

Some are reluctant to say "I don't know what that means" even if I assume they do or "should" know.
You're going to have to spell it out because it's not obvious.
Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
This is awesome! So much cleaner and easier to navigate compared to to UG, it isn't even funny. So much easier to navigate and focus on what's important. Thanks for sharing!

I added it to my Awesome Privacy Front-ends[1] list, hope that's okay!

[1] https://git.sr.ht/~jamesponddotco/awesome-privacy-front-ends
That reminds me of a client we had at a previous job. He would constantly stress out the system far beyond what others did. At one point I heard "100x" thrown around.

It let me fix major bottlenecks in our system long before it affected other customers, and we could just shut him off for a while (it was in his contract after a while) until I fixed the problem.

I was a little sad when they finally banned him for good, but the rest of the company was rather relieved.
There’s a big difference between abuse and not being liked by someone
That is true, With C allot of possible

> However, python by default has a small offset when reading memories while lower level language (rust and c)

Yet if the runtime is made with C, then that statement is incorrect.
I recently heard a priest say that all bad theology comes out of Germany. I'm pretty sure it was a joke, but sometimes I wonder...
Paperless started as "paperless" but the dev stopped work so another dev forked it to "paperless-ng" (for "next generation" I think). That dev, too, stopped work, so "paperless-ngx" was created.

The paperless-ngx's core team focused on gathering a group of people to support it to avoid any burnout problems and keep the project sustainable.
You seem to suppose that there is always some magic combination of words that would make the other side to suddenly change their behaviour. Unfortunately, there may be not: say, other other side actively doesn't want to change their behaviour (they're personally fine with it, and your proposed changes would inconvenience them ever so slightly), and then can afford to not change — now what?
Ubiquiti Launches Apple AirPort Express Styled Unifi Express
Video games in 2035 will be immersive...
You don’t need to match a heated affect to stand up to bullying. You just need to know where your lines are, and stand your ground. It can be done calmly, and might even be more effective that way.
This was such a good article! The debugging was smart (writing test programs to peel each layer off), the conclusion was fascinating and unexpected, and the writing was clear and easy to follow.
Just because there are bigger fish to fry doesn’t mean people shouldn’t pay attention to this
Some professionals on M2 will upgrade.

Anecdotally, A professional photographer I know invests significantly in hardware that speeds him up, and he upgraded from the M1 to the M2 because it allowed him to edit photos faster, allowing him to spend less time per job, so he could do more jobs and make more money. He was able to do math and determine how much time it needed to save him to be a worthwhile investment.
I'd skip the server! Hetzners Storage Share gives you NextCloud with admin privileges: https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-share

This is what I'm using these days.
Moon's scientifically important sites could be 'lost forever' in mining rush
Yes, many speakers like conviction and stand-alone facts.

Shared evidence and scientific criticism is a lost art (or fading) in the public square.

Unfortunately a lot of the science takes time and effort to dig in and understand.
If free will doesn't exist, we can't *not* punish people. By definition.

Those arguing against it also can't not argue. But they will lose the argue (it is inevitable), and then society will continue to punish, because it can't not do so.

Determinism, whatever the logic of its premise, it intellectually bankrupt.
How are arguments different from physical actions (for example what is the difference between telling someone something and applying electric shocks to them) in a world without free will?

Aren’t they all purely physical stimuli that produce a certain response?

I am sure an electric shock also produces a certain state of mind.
Gross is teaching kids about how their bodies work? I’m talking basics like the physiology of sleep and stress and how both affect learning, memory, and attention.

Student athletes learn more about their bodies and performance than students do about their brains.
History and science are both grounded in empiricism. "Empirical" means that a theory is based on observations (and not on private insights, revelations from God, etc.). Observations are not limited to experiments (if so, astronomy would not be "empirical"). In history, empirical evidence are usually observations of historical documents, artefacts and the like. They are then interpreted in the context of theoretical frameworks that are themselves based on a multitude of other empirical evidence. The lack of experiments does not make the construction of such theoretical frameworks unempirical, but in a way just harder.
You're misunderstanding. You can hold that the killer isn't 'morally' responsible, ie: deserves to be tortured for their crime, but still imprison them indefinitely for the good of everyone else.
You can already do that using existing models, but instead of generating 1 image taking a few seconds it will take at least a minute, perhaps SDXL Turbo brings that down
The US and Iran had been in a cold war since 1979 with flareups the entire time all the way through to the current day.
My Mother used to live in Buffalo. She would recount tales of the harsh winters up there. Using cross country skis out of her second floor window.

She mentioned that there were times when the Niagra river would freeze up and shut down the falls.
What is the connection between cookies and prostitution?
> What do you mean by 'actual'?

I mean the historical Nazis from WW2. Again: you admitted that not all Wehrmacht soldiers were evil, monsters, or even Nazis (other than nominally). But, in your words, all soldiers fighting for the Russian Federation right now in their aggression on Ukraine - are all bad people.

I'm asking, why do you agree to cut some slack for the former but are unwilling to do so for the latter?

Other than the latter being involved with you, personally, destroying your country and killing your people right now - of course. My grandpa lost 5 of his siblings to Germans in WW2 - they were civilians, killed because his uncle was a butcher, and happened to have a knife with him when they met German soldiers. It made him hate Germans, all of them, no exceptions, and I'm not surprised it turned out like that. He kept this hatred (only second to his hatred of Jews) to the very end of his life, and that's understandable, but it was irrational. I don't believe some Hans or Johann deserves to be hated 70 years later because of what happened back then. Similarly, dehumanizing and demonizing the whole Russian military (EDIT: or even the whole nation), including those poor convicts that supposedly die in droves as fodder for "human wave" tactics, is not rational now. I understand that hatred can be an emotional support for affected individuals, but it doesn't help the situation; instead, it makes it worse.
I think it is a fairly universal human desire to seek understanding of the world and make sense of it. Accurate modeling of the world and how it works confers safety and power and comparative advantage. This is why philiosophers and religionists have ask the question "why?" Even (especially) children like predictable rules.
This is so important!

Most people are not bad, and most of the time when two people don't get along, it's not because either of them are bad people. It's usually just a chemistry thing.
I care and presumably other people with the same outlook care, that's why I was asking.

You're trying to assuage my concerns with the information about the light. That's Meta responding to these concerns and taking efforts to avoid upsetting anyone.

But once the market is proven then another set of glasses will be marketed as having the feature of silent recording. By that time the force of the market will be too great and my concerns will be laughed at and I'll be called a luddite and told I never should have had an expectation of privacy to begin with.

This is the embrace before the inevitable extinguish.
Iraq attacked the USS Stark a year before. They used a business jet with an Exocet missile attached to it. This was by mistake but it still happened.

A single plane shooting down a ship is not unheard of but the US has done it in pairs to the whole Iran navy.
I just published Mastering API Penetration Testing: A Comprehensive Guide for Security Pentesters.

https://link.medium.com/76Jb6KK96Eb

Kindly give it a read and leave your valuable add-ons.
just drink coffee. I have ADHD and at cup 2 it has a huge focusing effect. Seems less risky
nope, that's completely incorrect, google does "compartmentalization of confidential, sensitive, or secret business logic and programs" in the monorepo. it's also massively increased how often it does and expanded how it works as management trusts employees less and less and less over time.
I opened an issue asking them to add `from typing import *` to the boilerplate.
Hopefully they will use JSON5 so comments can be included. The loss of comments when switching from XML to JSON was a disaster in other domains.
Thanks!
No, just one of the maintainers with a free evening.
We Made a Physical Button to Prove an Ad Works
A significant performance degradation due to normal use of the instruction (FSRM) not otherwise documented is a correctness problem. Especially considering that the workaround is to avoid using the CPU feature in many cases. People pay for this CPU feature now they need kernel tooling to warn them when they fallback to some slower workaround because of an alignment issue way up the stack.
>Good luck finding a sedan for less than $30k, manufacturers are only making expensive cars if they make any.

There's still affordable car makers in the west. Meet the Dacia Duster 2024 Hybrid SUV, starting at 20K, up to 30K fully loaded (Europe only). Probably gonna sell like hotcakes.

https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/dacia-duster
Yes, it's implied.
And, perhaps, there is a negative correlation due to selection.

Of the set of emotionally immature people, only those with excellent technical skills will remain in employment.
It's delusional to think humanities / ethics courses fix these problems.

It's managers who usually make these decisions, not engineers.

Doesn't the ruling elite of most countries study humanities courses? Does that prevent them from commuting much worse attrocites than this?

To be clear, I see more "gaming the system" behavior in India, but it's purely a result of more cut-throat competition in the market. "Ethics" and "morality" courses have shit to do with it.
I've worn GoPros around live streaming and people don't notice. Wearing these glasses with a little led on the frame 99.9% of people won't notice.
What if you're the one that's unliked ;)
Rarely tether. But sure, US dollar notes aren't being squeezed into digits and sent over the wire.

More seriously traditional institutions aren't keen on pegging their fiat themselves, so other entities (not only tether) did it. If you don't like the smell of tether just ask Circle they have been audited by trads auditors even.
As long as you have bullet proof legal protection on your side. Imagine being stuck and responsible for the mistakes and faults your business partner, with no easy way out. This happened to me, because I was young and incompetent in knowing people. Luckily I learned my lesson for a fairly cheap price, as there were no millions of dollars involved.
As I understand it, the offspring they are capable of producing are either horses or donkeys, not more mules.
Seems like it could be useful for a remote access trojan
The thing about docs is that it's tempting to write it and then forget it. And the only thing worse than no docs is outdated docs. Just like my password manager consists of 50/50 passwords I have since updated but not re-entered into the password manager (thus making it frustrating and useless) any big pile of docs will quickly become outdated and then first frustrating, finally useless.
This isn't a one off weekend project to "document your home". It's a commitment that lasts as long as you live there. Unless you want to know the model of your last dishwasher, you need to wonder if you really have a passion for this project.
Why Norway – the poster child for electric cars – is having second thoughts
That's not what I said. Unprocessed plant-based protein foods are cheaper and healthier than lab-grown meat.
Apple Pays Less Than 30 Cents in Royalties to Arm per Chip
Master has presented Dobb·E with open-source, Dobb·E is free!
How could you know what a perfect simulated version of me would do in advance, without first running the code? Even if you found a more efficient algorithm for getting the exact same end states faster, at some point you will reach a computationally irreducible limit, where you can’t predict what the improved simulated agent will do without first actually running the code. When you run the code it will freely decide to do one thing over another, and no one can know what this will be in advance, even in principle.
> The quality of discussion on hn has been steadily declining for a while. I reckon we are at reddit level at this point, with no end in sight.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit.
Hi, I'm the person running the MNX project! Contributions welcome — we're making good progress and the new format is going to be really fantastic.
If you want to do ML on notation, then maybe. MIDI or PCM audio might be a better place to start if you want to work directly on the music.
That's a very narrow minded view. China is number one counterpoint. Without free trade, and very favorable terms that Western countries offered, China wouldn't become the superpower it is today. The tension between US and China today has more to do with geopolitics than protectionism.

Read the following (from 1984) to understand how Deng Xiao Peng saw the roles of Special Economic Zone in the revival of China's economy:

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/deng-xiaoping/198...
Oil is more than fuel. We have to solve a lot more problems than fuel before we can stop pumping oil.
As others mentioned, your argument is fundamentally contradicted by facts.

The problem is that, without serious ideological engagement, neither side will ever stop. The current state of play is the failure of the non-solution that is "Two States", aka "Israel and bantustans". Bantustans have historically been unsustainable for any government that tried to implement them.
I've seen this on multiple Chrome-based browsers (Edge, Brave, Chrome) and it happens so much I've switch from Brave to Safari as my regular browser.
Weird since Yamaha pioneered the electric bicycle more than 30 years back.
I love/hate Guitar Pro. It’s indispensable but unstable.
It seems that people are not able to process the shock for the Chinese entrance to the automobile market. I have seen the Zeekr. It's simply insane. The price is competitive. The quality is competitive (I find it superior to VW and rather competing with BMW/Audi). China also can build stuff at large scale. Now, is it reliable for 5-7 years? That's still not known but we are about to find out.