skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Europe has more stringent food safety requirements than the US...so yes, at least some of the laws are in place for safety reasons.

And who says protecting domestic food sovereignty is a bad thing?

My family is 3 generations of living in plantation housing...on stolen land in Hawaii. A big part of how colonialism works is controlling "the essentials". Food production, water, land rights, information, martial force, etc

It seems like the claim is there is some large consumer demand for these foodish items. If there is, then we can expect a huge black market for these foodish products to emerge in Italy. Policía de Italia better get ready for the deluge...Expect Mama Mia to throw away her heirloom cookbooks for the new meatish craze that's about to sweep through Italy.

The soylent Don will be the most powerful man in the country I tell you...Actually, that could be the real reason behind the ban on the foodish the Italians so desperately crave. Soylent Don wants to corner the market? Your multi-national corporations better make Soylent Don an offer he can't refuse before this gets out of hand...
I strongly disagree. Having something which is 90% reliable doesn't save me any effort over just doing it myself. If I have to spend the time to check everything the tool generates (which I do, because LLMs are unreliable) then I may as well have written it myself to start with.

I firmly believe that the worst kind of help is unreliable help. If your help never does its job, then you know you have to do everything yourself. If your help always does its job, you know you can trust it. If your help only sometimes does its job, you get the worst deal of all because you never know what you'll get and have to check every single time.
One thing I never understood is why hybrids have the 12 volt battery at all. Couldn't the entertainment system etc be powered from the 200V EV battery (after stepping it down obviously)?
I also have Plex Lifetime and was fed up with something or another and switching to Jellyfin was pretty nice and straightforward. I'd recommend as well if you have a free afternoon/weekend.
This is not to be dismissive but there is a security risk if we keep on using the abstraction with arbitrary objects being serialized to disk and being able to trace back and see if the model file (most commonly python pickle files) aren’t tampered with .
Oh sounds a very neat way to explore binary!
They cover this in the article, they verified that the output matched data found on the internet, 100% verbatim.
I couldn't agree more. Especially [Hyundai's recent sports car concept](https://www.hyundai-n.com/en/models/rolling-lab/n-vision-74....)
The anti-aircraft/missile defence on Sheffield was Sea Dart. The Argentinian pilots were familiar with the type 42 destroyer type and its radar, and practiced against the Argentine's own type 42s. This might have some bearing on their success as well.
You're implying I subconsciously view them the same and pronounce them the same. But I don't. Maybe your dialect of English is different than mine, but I am not you. And it was there for a while because I use Hacker News on my phone and don't check it all the time.

My original sentence repeated the same word twice as a typo. It was this:

> I was confused reading people say that Jacques is pronounced the same as Jacques.

I realized my mistake and edited it to this:

> I was confused reading people say that Jacques is pronounced the same as Jack.

If we'd been discussing the words "chick" and "chic," I might have accidentally written:

> I was originally confused reading people say that chick is pronounced them the same as chick.

Then I'd realize my error and edit it to:

> I was originally confused reading people say that chick is pronounced them the same as chic.

That doesn't mean I actually pronounce "chick" the same way as "chic" and it doesn't make the words interchangeable in the dialect I speak. "Chic" is pronounced like "Sheikh," referring to the Arab leader, or like "Sheik" from the Legend of Zelda. I'll be confused if you say "a baby Sheikh" instead of "a baby chick," and if you say "chick fashion" instead of "chic fashion" I'll be thrown off but realize you meant "chic."
Not great for energy efficiency, I guess. They might eventually dispose of them if running costs are too high compared to more modern chips.
Of course he was passed over for flag. At Commander and above, it's more or less expected that you have a successful Commanding Officer tour in rank order to promote. A few Commanders that don't get command make Captain, but it's the exception rather than the rule. And it's virtually unheard of to make flag without a successful Captain command, because there are so many more Captains than there are slots for Rear Admiral (Lower Half) that most end up retiring anyway. If your CO tour blows up in your face, it's basically a guarantee that you will be expected to retire at the earliest possible opportunity.

The best quote I've ever heard on the subject is "the Navy doesn't have hospitals for careers. It has leper colonies."
Not sure if it's based on WebDAV but Seafile is probably one of the only few that works for self hosted file synchronizer.
If it comes with a time machine you'll be able to pop to the future to download its full self driving capabilities...
Christian have been living in Gaza and West banks for the last 2000 years… (and a Church was bombed in Gaza killing 18 Christians). In fact the number of Christian has only started to decrease for the last 70 years as they suffer the exact same treatment as Muslims.
Hyundai didn't have the problem of requiring people to build roads differently. Loongson however will have that problem, as software is either targeting x86 or ARM.
I don't know why so many devs avoid a GUI for Git
The thing weighs 8000 to 10000 lb (3629 to 4536 kg).

That’s shockingly heavy to move around 200lbs meat sacks.
> Either CUDA will open up, if it is to survive or open API use will spread.

CUDA won't die if Open APIs take over AI inferencing operations. It's still used and applied in so many niche industries that it can only be "replaced" in industries like AI where companies invest in moving digital mountains. Stuff like Microsoft's ONNX project will go a long way towards making CUDA unneccesary for AI acceleration, but it won't ever kill the demand for CUDA.

Just look at how lethargic the industry's response has been in the wake of AI, and look at how other companies like AMD and Apple abandoned OpenCL before it was ready. Now Apple is banking on CoreML as an integration feature and AMD is segmenting their consumer and server hardware like crazy.

> Weirdly, NVIDIA hardware only outperforms competitors on its own API. When you compare NVIDIA on a level playing field, they aren't the clear winners.

That does not reflect any of the benchmarks I've seen at all, unless by "level playing field" you mean comparing old Nvidia chips to modern AMD ones. The only systems comparable to the DGX pods Nvidia sells is Apple's hardware, which lacks the networking and OS support to be competitive server side.

AMD is an amazing company for being open and transparent with their approach, but nice guys always finish last. This is a race between the highest-density TSMC customers, which means it's Apple and Nvidia laughing their respective paths to the bank.
does it have sub 10-micron accuracy?
> Tesla literally didn't realize the steel comes in coils and it naturally wants to warp back into that state

Steel comes in many shapes. Are you saying they used hot versus cold-rolled steel?
I just wish it weren't so hideous-looking. The car industry already went through a "make everything ugly" phase a couple of decades ago. It'd be nice if they didn't repeat that!
> vehicle of similar weight

All...one of them: https://www.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/money/cars/2019/10/...
How did NVIDIA entrench itself as the leader in academia? From a market perspective it's interesting how they cornered it.
As soon as Semaglutide et all become generic, obesity will be completely over, worldwide. It will be looked at as an awful period in history like Opium dens are now.
Yes. But it seems actually less dangerous then other pickups.

Other pickups seem to think that having as high as possible as big as possible vehicle front is a great thing.

Going OVER the car is what saves live. If you get hit by a F-150 it more like getting hit by a wall.

The Cybertruck also seems to have better visibility.

So this seems to me to be a case of 'In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king'.

In general US obsessions with pickups is stupid and I hope in my country all of them are commercial license only, not allowed on common parking spaces, ban in certain section of cities, plus very high licensing cost.
Few-Shot Classification and Segmentation Using Large Language Models Agent
"Also South Asians are a very diverse group in it itself. As are East Asians. Many different languages and cultures…."

Europeans and their diaspora (aka White people) are also very diverse in the sense of many languages, many cultures, many phenotypes, varied histories, etc.

But we all know what capital-D "Diversity" means here, and it is not this.
Building a backyard office, the build and cost breakdown
Good point! I believe none of the other Edge platforms are fully open source yet (I don't mean their runtime being OSS, but the Edge Platform itself). Clouflare Workers is the only one that gets there half way with Workerd (they are missing KV, other APIs and the glue-code).

Right now the Wasmer Edge product usage is not in a stable enough point to make it open-source. I'd love to share the timelines, but anything that I say now will likely be wrong (as we are still iterating hard on the product).

> I would be interested in restricting specific requests to certain regions

I can see this being an issue if you plug the workload with data that is located in a specific region (for example, via a DB connection or doing API calls to an API in a specific region). Is that your use case?
AWS Icons Are Confusing
It's not ridiculous. Your statement reads as "I condemn it, but they really had it coming", which a reasonable person could understand to mean "I don't really condemn it".
> ...what does the number actually mean in practice?

Seemingly very little:

We study 20 trouble areas, from nuisances—such as squeaky brakes and broken interior trim—to major bummers, such as potentially expensive out-of-warranty engine, transmission, EV battery, and EV charging problems. We use that information to give reliability ratings for every major mainstream model.

We weigh the severity of each type of problem to create a predicted reliability score for each vehicle, from 1 to 100. We use that information to give reliability ratings for every major mainstream vehicle. (The reliability rating is then combined with data collected from our track testing, as well as our owner satisfaction survey results and safety data, to calculate each test vehicle’s Overall Score.)
Chamelium automates external display testing across VGA, HDMI, and DisplayPort
> How can they be so sure the model isn’t just hallucinating?

This is explicitly covered in the article, if you scroll down.
> driving every day is more dangerous than not driving every day

Can't disagree there. Do you also do thing like having groceries/shopping delivered to your place of residence, to avoid having to leave the house. Or do you still walk/commute/drive/travel to things that most would consider part of everyday life?
No way BMW is that high. I literally saw the past 2-3 weeks two X7s and an X5 stranded on the highway, on my way to work.

I remember because I was joking yesterday with my partner that we should never buy a Beamer.
So to defend the help points because it's interesting;

You literally cannot write a powershell function that doesn't support get-help <myfunc>. So that's already a win it's self documenting because of the type system. The better the developer uses the type system the better the generated help. Sticking to the standard format for help (which is generated for you again from tab-complete) enhances this help document further. Finally, adding a url(https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/devel...) lets the builtin update-help download new help, independent of publishing a new cmdlet version. So authors can fix typos/wording or add translations or examples without having to issue a release.

I've been doing linux sysadmin at least a decade, literally never heard of apropos before. I disagree that leaving this up to the authors is beneficial. When I'm lost and confused consistency is key.

Because this it builtin by default, it's worth it for the authors to add.

A lot of odd pwsh syntax is precisely because it's a proper language in a shell format, and just by that nature there's some ugly stuff in there. < > is already used so -le -gt -lte -eq exists.

Because it's a typed structured language, you will never have it without tab-complete, it's just designed in. That's the answer to maintain readability and typeabillity they chose. Bash just didn't choose readability. they both have alias' for common things. You may disagree but I would say that's just like refusing to use dot-sourcing or import statements in any language. It's there to use.

Your final remark about python I feel just adds to my point of don't bother with bash. I'd almost insist a shell that does even less then pwsh/bash and forced you to use a proper language sooner would be better.
What you’re missing here is pressure.

Steam turbines work not because of steam alone, you can fill a room with steam insert a turbine and nothing happens. To get them to spin you need higher pressure on the input side of the turbine than the output. If you want to have steam go up a shaft that’s going to increase the pressure on output side and thus reduce the amount of energy generated by the turbine.
That's pretty much how I would feel for this or for the Homer Car. Is either one a good idea? Probably not, no. But it's fun to see different things, and trying new stuff is how we learn and grow, even when we do it because the CEO or his brother is making bad decisions.
>>Do people actually believe anything a car salesman says anyway?

Used car? Very little

New car? I've found a few good ones, and much of what they need to say is verifiable (e.g., in the specs in a brochure / official website).

I think the point was that customers can't even get basic info out of these people, and they aren't even offering their usual level of encouragement to buy. I.e., the car sales people (and the managers failing to provide training) are not doing their jobs. If they don't want to do their jobs, then the companies should be able to route around them.
Most EVs weigh about that much, to the point that some cities are considering amending "No trucks" signs to also say no EVs.
The "Illustrations" credit on the cover is covered up by the "Programmers Press" but it looks like it is John Klossner. The hand-drawn illustrations are great, definitely one of my favorite aspects of the book.
If you happen to be operating a Jira based support desk and want to reduce the risk of leaking customer data via HAR files, I took the HAR Scrubber that Cloudflare made and built a Jira plugin out of it:

https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1232593/securely-for-...
The board he drew was totally unintelligible but also immediately told me that Netflix didn’t or doesn’t know what its actual domains are. Adding functionality like this, even in a microservices world, should have been trivial and obvious, but nobody thought ahead and now they’ve ended up with a spiderweb of tangled services that have unclear responsibilities.
> Then maybe have a separate model trained on going from syntax tree to source code.

I don't see why you need a model for this. But yes, this is a very cool idea.
Sheffield was not equipped with Aegis. The only ships in the 1980s that had it were the American Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruisers. Aegis is the name of a specific anti-air system based around the SPY-1 phased-array radar and SM-2 surface-to-air missile. It is not a catch-all term like Kleenex.
Society does provide ways, but people don't always care. They won't take a hint, because they want an argument. They'll keep trying to get what they want.

My grandmother was one of those people. She wanted to "win debates", in her words. I'm not sure the winning ever happened, but she tried for decades.
> they just went about it the wrong way.

You're totally right about it.

but honestly I did not expect anything better from post-fascists
In an earlier comment you wrote:

> In fact it should likely cost prisoners something if it is good for them.

Which is equivalent to "if it is good for them it should likely cost prisoners something" i.e. "if it is good for them it likely should not be free for prisoners".

I'm aware that the hnarn's comment said "you" instead of "prisoners", but the principle of charity leads me to assume that hnarn meant specifically a prisoner rather than any person. And regardless, the answer to the question "Can you find a “shouldn’t“ part in my response?" is yes.
stainless has a very strong tendency to want to walk back from forming operations.
That's not counting just how many working X7 and X5's you passed.
Sure, but Apple's phone chips started out with performance comparable to low-end laptop CPUs.

Looking at the TDP, these seem more promising than other Chinese silicon designs which have been terrible flops.
I am suggesting that they can't. They have a serious innovation problem. A lot of their designs started out stolen or cloned from the West. They also don't have anything like ASML available to them. And to get this out SMIC ripped off TSMC intellectual property.

I'm not saying they won't deliver useful silicon but they won't be delivering comparable silicon. And it'll be under trade embargo no doubt due to the IP issues so they will have a very limited market to scale into.

This happened before (GDR) and the products were never competitive.

I think the best thing they have done though is kick out compatible ATmega parts and the STM32 parts. They're really killing it there.
Hey, could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments / name-calling / flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly (another example is https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38438522). It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

Your good comments are quite good, though, so if you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Llamanate
I haven't worked in a GUI in 5 years
I think I’m going with this as a car owner and buyer I would be very reluctant to switch back from an EV. It’s just for me so much nicer and more convenient. I have a few friends who share the same sentiment. It’s a category change and the Japanese automakers (to which I have great affinity) aren’t in the category so there’s nothing for me to buy from them.
And other cars due to the weight.
> If I have to spend the time to check everything the tool generates (which I do, because LLMs are unreliable) then I may as well have written it myself to start with.

Do you feel the same way about a PR from a coworker?
There is an interesting genetic difference between cilantro-tolerant and cilantro-averse individuals. Similarly, some people smell asparagus in their pee, others don't. (The pee smells the same, in both cases.)
Ask ChatGPT something like:

> what's a 10 day itinerary for a road trip from San Francisco to Las Vegas? I'd like to focus on nature and history and to only drive about 2 hours at a time.

The back-and-forth refinement with follow-up questions is a great way to dig deeper. I usually use it as a starting spot because AI often hallucinates especially when you're doing something more weird.
CUDA runs on most recent Nvidia GPUs, which are replete on college campuses and well-supported in server software. AMD's GPGPU compute support differs from GPU to GPU, and Apple didn't start contributing acceleration patches to Pytorch and Tensorflow until stuff like Llama and Stable Diffusion took off.
Prediction: if it does poorly people will call Musk a failure. If it does well people will call Musk a grifter. Either way people will be salty.
"We dug our own grave."
having a screen with a satnav is a must, to compare GOM miles remaining to miles remaining of route
The shoe-shaped things are that way because of crumple areas and pedestrian safety requirements (if the car hits a pedestrian, the bonnet is supposed to deform in order to minimize injuries). Contrast that to the Cybertruck, which...

> ...has received criticism from automotive safety groups, including the Australasian New Car Assessment Program and the Euro NCAP, for not conforming to standards for pedestrian and cyclist safety. In its December 2019 form, the truck would likely not be street-legal in either Australia or the European Union.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Cybertruck
Structured Basic was already a thing in the 80's, see VMS Basic, or Turbo Basic.
The price is the same though, regardless of what I'm getting, and I wouldn't care, except in my non-prod environments everything runs fine on some class of processor, while on my prod environment things didn't run fine and my cluster was maxed out because it was running on some old processor.
I know that notionally it can and will run on different hardware in different environments, but if I can run a certain workload (idling at 10% in one environment), I expect to be able to do the same in another environment.
I'm not talking about dead-code elimination (that's something that compiles do since decades, without AI), and not about something like Scalafix's automatic refactorings (which are actually deterministic and correct, because it doesn't use AI), but about some true AI that could simplify code—and remove in that process at least 80% of it, because that's usually just crap that piled up over time.

Like said: Wake me up when when you can show me metrics where the use of AI shrunk code-bases by significant large amounts. For example going from 500 kLOC to 100 kLOC, or something like that. (Of course without loosing functionality; and at the same time making the code-base easier to understand). That would be success.

Everything that goes in the opposite direction is imho just leading inevitably to doom.
go is step by step reinventing exceptions
This is not true - there are other factors at play. The angle of the bumper and where the bumper comes into contact with a human matters a lot - if it is below the human's center of mass, they are much less likely to be thrown under the vehicle and run over.
Do they? Model X weighs 5600lbs, here - https://www.caranddriver.com/tesla/model-x - and that's bigger than any of the other, more popular, Teslas other than the Cybertruck.

Far cry from 8-10000. Or even 7-8000.
Happened to my wife's ex-Toyota CHR hybrid (not plug-in hybrid) after 5 weeks of vacation. I hooked a CTEK charger to it for 8 to 12 hours and all was good again. I didn't leave the car on the CTEK charger for five weeks because it was parked outside and not at our place.

Otherwise CTEK chargers are really nice. Certain car brands like Porsche while sell you a "Porsche charger" for two or three times the price but it's just a CTEK charger re-branded with the Porsche logo on it.

If you've got a garage with electricity, it's an option. If you don't want to let the car on the charger during 5 weeks, just connect it as soon as you come back and in a few hours the car is ready.
They're not flat surfaces
I appreciate these articles but there's always something they overlook: what if the other party doesn't want to play ball? You see it in politics, relationships, business - if the other side is in "I win, you lose" mode, none of these coping strategies really work. That's the article I want to see written.