skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ask HN: Google ignores my repository on GitHub and I do not know what to do
Hi. No matter what I do, I cannot google my GitHub repo for my latest project. It just does not exist in the search results. I can even find myself and other projects I made but not this one.

Does anyone know why it might be happening and what I can do to fix it? Will renaming the repo help? But what name to pick then? I am really not good at SEO.

Here is the direct link to the project: https://github.com/RussBaz/VaporHX

Thanks everyone.
"[to] get Biome running in Wasmer", it seems
It happens often in JSX, you add one prop, which makes the line longer than the line width, which turns it into a multi line change.

It's annoying, but not a reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
...a lot of those presets are 'dice driven', it seems to me. Press a dicembre random settings, save: give it a name.
Synth1 on the other hand....
Didn’t Nvidia also get pulled up by courts recently for stealing code? I am not condoning either action, but this seems to be a tech culture issue of which almost every company seems to be guilty of rather than just everyone’s fav punching bag tcs.
I _technically_ had prior knowledge as a computer architecture class had us stick some premade pieces together to create a CPU we designed, but I personally wrote no Verilog, and it was a small subset of the class.

I don't have much documentation for getting started with HDLs (Verilog, VHDL, etc), but I have tried to document my process as much as possible. I have primarily developed for the Analogue Pocket, so my documentation is themed towards that device, but there's IP (code modules) and wiki entries that would be useful for everyone: https://github.com/agg23/analogue-pocket-utils

I had previously written a cycle accurate NES emulator, so I was familiar with hardware techniques, but not what they look like in circuits. The first core I wrote was a schematic accurate Pong implementation. This was both good and bad because it's very simple and has no CPU (and thus no code), but it also makes it very hard to tell what is going on. I went from there to doing a lot of ports (NES, SNES, PCE, and a few more), and after that I worked on my own cores (Tamagotchi, Game and Watch). Tamagotchi I took a very typical software approach where I wrote massive amounts of unit tests and wrote against those tests. While this is what real hardware developers do, I found it to be a huge waste of time when you're working by yourself on a small project.

I, and a few others, are very willing to help people learn (though I'm still really a noob). If you want to play around in this space, let me know and I'll try to help you with what you need.
speak for yourself.
A Rare Soulages Lithograph Possibly Worth $30k Sells for $130
Kagi isn't a target for SEO tactics. If they became as popular as Google, SEO manipulators would find ways to improve their position on Kagi.
It's an 8 year old SBG6580-2 with radio button selection for 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz on the web interface. I bought the cheapest one guaranteed to work with Xfinity to save on the rental costs. I'll upgrade when they force a move from DOCSIS 3.0. Just like I'll upgrade my cheapest smart phone with a replaceable battery when they force a move from 4G (or finally make a workable phone with a physical keyboard again).
I respect having firm criteria, but I'd say that games like Hearthstone or Magic: The Gathering Arena are in a totally different category from the typical F2P bullshit. Mostly because they're real games that are designed to be games first rather than a money-extraction machine.

But also like, I played MTGA for a very long time and only ever spent money on cosmetics.
Similar here. My mom had a mid-90s BMW 5-Series 540i Touring that I was allowed to drive when I got my license. The thing had a manual fuel consumption indicator going up to 30l/100km which was crossed at the slighest touch of the pedal. Anything above 180km/h you could watch the fuel gauge needle move.
Dates, Times, Calendars: The Universal Source of Data Science Trauma (2019)
It's not really an issue if you do a one-time Prettification commit, and then stick to Prettifying automatically thereafter. Then you won't ever see line-width changes mixed in with functional changes.

Isn't this an issue with every linter? At some point you're going to have to decide what to do with old code that doesn't match the new style rules.
It's also perfectly possible to draw maps of places that don't exist in reality, i.e., that only exist in somebody's brain.
Well, if you were my audience I might say, "Football, or hand egg?" :)
Who built the first minicomputers? (2014)
Probably because the list needed constant maintenance. A game that was micro transaction free in January could have changed their business model by June. You genuinely have to keep playing every game constantly to make sure it continued to satisfy the original conditions
Better than my similar Mac story from the early aughts. I did not frequently use Mac computers but needed to quickly print a document I had burned to CD. For whatever reason, I was in the Mac computer lab which had nothing but what I believe were Power Mac G3s. Inserting when fine, and I knew from using those original black and white Macs in high school that dragging the disk to the trash would eject. When I did so I was rudely informed I lacked permissions to unmount a disk that I had myself just inserted and used.

Fortunately, the lack of an eject button was a farce on this machine. The CD drive was just your garden variety PC drive and if you aren't shy about abusing the facade door Apple placed over top of it you can still get to the eject button.
I remember I also had to do an official IQ test first.

The school wanted to know if I was stupid or just could read very well.
Well... It kinda replaced Java for most cloud stuff except for Kafka.
I think you typed "python" wrong :)
Duck typing is a python thing. And the dependency management is a nightmare, constantly breaking. To the article's point - you _must_ run it in a container and defer to the OS to have anything resembling a sane development story.
> And that's for good reason. Encyclopedias are supposed to be tertiary sources, not primary sources. Having an explicit cited reference makes it easier to judge the veracity of a statement compared to digging through the page history to figure out if a line was added by a person who happens to be an expert.

But why is a reference to "[1] Blog post by XXX" (or, even worse, "[1] Blog post by YYY based on their tentative understanding of XXX") a more authoritative source than "[1] Added to Wikipedia personally by XXX"? Of course, Wikipedia potentially has no proof that the editor was actually XXX in the latter case; but they have even less proof that a blog post purporting to be by XXX actually is.
This is so great! It's a great place and time to be alive in. I simply hope we can use these tools to bring peace to regions who never experience 1% of what the US quality of life has to offer. Let's start building code that makes war obsolete. And please let's save the idealism for the dreamers.
everyone here will forget we only have encryption today because openbsd was in Canada.

every usa based project had to quit shipping any cryptography code. but who cares about history. who cares you can only participate in some open source project today if you have an account with usa companies? nobody cares. screw the Iranian engineering student. and hope the usa doesn't outlaw encryption again.
I used to set my MacBook Pro on ice packs when working on certain processor-intensive tasks... Seemed to help!
For Amtrak only you can use the official source https://www.amtrak.com/track-your-train.html too (it shows route and also delay)
At some point this “universe simulator” concept is nonsense because if I don’t retain some aspect of my own personality and mental capacity, it’s not me in the simulator anymore. For all I know, maybe I’m a sentient mushroom from Alpha Centauri except I’m in a “universe simulator” where I am experiencing the life of a human being here on Earth having arguments on Hacker News. Maybe when I come out of the universe simulator I will have a greater empathy for your species.

The hypothetical risk of AI-generated deepfake nudes is, in principle, no different from what you could do with Photoshop even when I was a teenager. It’s easier to send the fake nudes to everybody these days, but I seriously doubt anybody would have been genuinely fooled and it would reflect more on whoever made and disseminated the fakes.
I will spell it out for you: Almost every language in the world has some sort of template-based autocomplete for common boilerplate that is often used, from class definition templates to if statements. If you aren't using one of these, you're probably working unproductively by thinking about all of your boilerplate instead of just taking it off the shelf. Copilot and its ilk just take this one step further by effectively giving you the same thing but with the slots in the template filled in. I could have said that "with autocomplete it's easy to write" and it would have the same meaning.

The presence or absence of boilerplate (and thus the presence/usability of autocomplete systems) does not imply anything about simplicity.
On the note of my sibling comment, a common book in this space for learning is "Designing Video Game Hardware in Verilog", which is specifically retrocomputing related.
If that's actually true and there's not another way, then tough. They shouldn't be on the roads.
The train situation in the USofA is depressing on so many more levels than just speed. Availability is even worse. I'm in Dallas, but to get to Denver, I have to go to Chicago first and involves a >2 hour bus ride along the way. WTF?
Prettier often makes code written using sequences of .chaining much more difficult to read by forcing it all to the same line.

For the same reason, it often makes code written using composition more difficult to read since it won't let you decide when to put a sub-call on its own indented line for clarity.
> geniuses

That's very strong language. Go was created by some smart people that have completely ignored programming language developments that happened after the 70's.
Alternately, it's example of how absurdly some obsess over it.

Excepting bad luck and pretty-obvious excess, almost everybody will have about 6-7 decades of adulthood and maybe 1-2 decades of slowing down and feeling less capable in the last of those. If you can come to terms with that, and many do, there's not a lot to worry about.

All the obsessing people get up to here is a kind of "premature optimization" that often sends people flailing around between research trends without any of the rigor or continuity that might have yeilded benefit anyway. It's a lot of time, effort, and mental energy stolen from the most vibrant and impactful stage of life in questionable hope of squeezing a teensy bit more out of the least.
Bring us another complete ordered field and I’ll pay handsomely for it.
Teenage Parenthood and Birth Rates for Individuals With and Without ADHD
Fair, though you can find plenty of stuff on the internet using React, but where the app/page itself performs abysmally. Meaning maybe there is some merit in approaches that are easier for lesser skilled teams to deliver in.
> I could just submit an empty sheet of paper, & an artist would argue that my empty sheet of paper represents any/all of the above.

And they'd be taken about as seriously as the ads taped to a urinal in a Museum of Modern Art washroom.
Sourced from https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/contra-kirkegaard-on-evolut... ("Astral Codex Ten: Contra Kirkegaard On Evolutionary Definitions Of Mental Illness")

> People with ADHD have more children than people without ADHD, probably because the people with ADHD forget to use condoms (here is a source for teenagers [my note: this post], can’t find source for adults but I’ve definitely heard this). That means that by Emil’s definition, not having ADHD is a mental disorder!
Do grocery stores “capitalize on vulnerability” when they place name-brand products at eye level?

Do carmakers “capitalize on vulnerability” when they advertise pickup trucks as big tough vehicles for tough, outdoorsy men?

Do providers of health insurance for pets “capitalize on vulnerability” when they say you need to buy their product if you love your pet?

At some point people need to be responsible for their own decisions. And I can’t get that worked up about Meta’s free product.
I don’t see how that relates to my comment
Phenomenal! Love this very much. Good vibes sent to all of y'all.
I don't know what "fair" has to do with that. These are two examples that caught my attention, and I might be wrong that this constitutes a trend. If you have data that says otherwise, please share.
I wonder if there's an alternate way to get there without that monstrosity, which manages to be triply-offensive.
” I'm just Robot Dad, not real dad -
so I'm afraid I can't help you with that”

I am just thinking - there’s helluva many questions I couldn’t answer either. And how often will the model use this answer? So far the LLMs are quite happy to keep answering even though the answer can’t be found in its training.
Yeah, you just described every Go project. Reading Go code is a nightmare of frustrations.
> At some point people need to be responsible for their own decisions

This is like saying “everything in moderation” in a discussion about nutrition. No shit. We’re trying to find that delineation.
>having thieves steal their money if they got too rich

Money attracts that kind of thing, even in the real world. There's a reason rich people have guards. Also bodyguards - I was just listening to a podcast about how a fairly rich (and flashy) drug dealer got kidnapped and ransomed because he didn't think about what a target he was. Obviously more challenging when you're talking about heroes who are personally formidable, but think about friends, family members, retainers, etc.
I wish Google would let us convert a personal Workspace account to a regular Gmail account.
This hack will always work, they must thermally insulate the laptop case, otherwise the laptop is a huge burn hazard. About 43 C is the threshold for pain, anything above that will cause burns.
Many of those shareholders are themselves Meta users or have kids who use Meta products. Crazy what kind of masochism "the system" encourages.
It is interesting that this PR pre-empts the natural takeaway many would have — eating more dairy or red meat — by reductively representing the options as “cheeseburgers” and “pizza.”

Checking out the research paper[1], the competing interests section declares that Chen “has patents pending on TVA and TVA derivatives.”

I don’t think the underlying reasoning is incorrect, but the way it’s presented is interesting.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06749-3
> I hope others are thinking about these questions and I’m not being a wet blanket.

I wasn't, specifically. But they feel like specialisations or subclasses of the general unease I feel about a lot of our contemporary tech.

As an example: I've grown to hate most social tech, mainly because of the tracking. But the mental image I used to get me off it was to imagine Zuck sitting in on all my conversations, silently taking notes. You wouldn't tolerate that, even if it wasn't Zuck. And yet we do.

Many of us are willing to remove the human connection, the effort to learn, the struggle to express from our day to day lives. It's the learning and struggle that gives extra value to the encounters we have and the situations we make. To me, using a lot of this technology feels like giving away something of what makes life worth living. (I understand the convenience; I get that "it's just a tool", I use tools all the time, I'm willing to engage with this new stuff to learn more about it, but slowly).

The worst is that we're giving that effort, that learning, that struggle (and its impact on us) to unaccountable entities which can bypass the social contracts we would normally make with one another, and which can scale up profit from that donation, thereby also devaluing our own labours and experiences to enrich a small few. Open source mitigates some of that, but most users would still be giving up their own embodiment of their creative acts.
Matrix factorization was popular in industrial recommender systems for years afterwards, and its ideas are still useful today. https://sifter.org/~simon/journal/20061211.html
Polymer was incredibly even slower that React and even more overbuilt, and it had the added negative that it tried to enforce a visual style as well, which was too much for most people. Google couldn’t spend its way out of that hole.

As for Web Component specs, we got v1 because of Apple and Mozilla: Google would happily have stayed with v0.
(Sorry for intruding into the conversation, and thank you for sharing your experience).

First thing I thought about was they might have applied and just forgot (I registered "grandfather"/"grandmother" as older people, though now I realize it might not have been so, as you were a two year old, so they might as well have been into their forties).
Data Explorer: Electric car sales, stocks, and charging points
Yes, yes, and yes. However, the three situations you named are targeting adults. Children and teenagers are worth insulating from the full might of advertisers, propagandists, and always-on virtual social circles.
The district court just ordered the Transport Agency to hand over the plates to Tesla within a week, Postnord be damned.

https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/domstol-teslas-registreri...
https://mega.io

The quality of their software is vastly superior to Google Drive. They have mobile, desktop, and CLI apps on Windows/Apple/Linux. Been using them for a year without issues.
> I think a trillion dollar company should pay for excellent customer service.

Or any customer service. The support forums are worthless except for really trivial things that can be resolved equally well elsewhere.
> I'm chuckling

Ironically the picture of the chuck is a collet
> shareholders would revolt if Zuck came out and said

Zuckerberg has super-voting shares that give him control over Facebook [1].

[1] https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/zuckerberg-motivates-s...
> It creates a very strange world where we have computers acting like people and people acting like machines.

Of course people here are getting hung up on your analogy. It's no surprise. But what you've written here is a very real consequence of our growth economy because humans are merely inputs into hoarding monetary capital. All other capital, including people, with the exclusion pf land and some selective niceties are expendable towards that end.
That's the most basic feature of broadcasting, but not quite what Julia's broadcasting is all about. There's also the case of things like

f(x,y) = cos(x)*sin(y)

g(x,y) = tan(x)*inv(y)

x, y = (rand(4), rand(4))

z = rand(4)

z .= f.(x,y') .+ g.(x',y)

to create create one loop that creates whole matrix of results and writes in-place into z. Is there a syntax for that in modern Fortran? I know that it has intrinsic functions which accepts vectors but its this fusion of multiple operations mixed with how it handles differently-sized objects that really defines the braodcasting operation.
It's not exactly the same, but in owlcat's upcoming CRPG Warhammer 40k: Rogue Trader, is similar. You can just get anything and everything with costs lower than your wealth level (but not above at all). I'm assuming it's similar or the same in the TTRPG it's based on.
Never been down there. Maybe someday. Sounds like a cool spot.
The problem is that style matters and therefore those debates matter. Just because something isn't important to the developers that made Prettier doesn't mean that it's not important to the productivity of other developers.
"The central problem with Singularity theory is that it is really only attractive to nerds. Vibing with all of humanity across the universe would mean entangling your consciousness with that of every other creep, and if you’re selling that vision and don’t see that as an issue, then it probably means that you’re the creep."
There really isn't any single service you can move to, to be "safe". This is why 3-2-1 backup schemes exist for important data, although they have morphed a bit with cloud usage. The basic idea is to be robust to any single point of failure (at minimum, but extra redundancy costs). So if your laptop or your google photos blows up, you still have everything.

If you have things you really care about not losing, you need a backup strategy.
Lit's features are internal to each component (except context which is being developed as an open community protocol with the Web Components Community Group) and there is no coupling between components written in Lit. So you can port from Lit to something else component-by-component.

Lit is also modular. The template library, lit-html, is usable independently and used by other web component and non-web component libraries. The reactive custom element base class ReactiveElement can be used to build web components with a different template system like Preact.

So yes, "lock-in as low as possible".
They would probably somehow own the shitty little kiosk anyway.
Until windows 11, no, windows zip only seems to deal with COMPRESS/DEFLATE zip files.
What should Prettier should do in this case?

I think we can all agree there should be a line length limit, it has to enforce it eventually. You could say “it’s just a couple more characters” until the line is 200 characters long.

Semantic diff is maybe the solution.
In the thin-coax ethernet days, pretty standard tool in the bag was a Fluke[1] portable Time Domain Reflexomter to do this. Much more precise than the NIC based measurements. Very useful for finding exactly where someones 'cable management' ended up nailing through the coax, or where someone ignored bend radius limits when installing.

[1] Other vendors made them...I just always had a Fluke
I took a year off. I couldn't exactly afford it, and I didn't exactly sign up for it either (laid off). But it was exactly what I needed.

I lost a loved one and mistakenly assumed work peers would understand that I was struggling. They didn't. No secret the workplace makes people astoundingly cold. This left me feeling bitter at the industry.

Towards the 8 month mark I started to have a different crisis: I still didn't want to work again. Would I ever want to work again? Just in the knick of time I did find my stride. My point is that it took patience. You're in the wrong environment for that.

I'm sure you've heard this before but your work doesn't care about you. Your co-workers don't care about you. If you put even a small amount of care or emotion into the job you're playing yourself.

Your kid matters. Your job doesn't. Your deadlines are a lie made up by someone who should be focused on going to therapy. Sounds like you're a driven, talented individual. Take a break for you and your kid. That ambitious drive won't leave you just because you took a break to focus on what actually matters.