skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
According to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40699071/can-i-make-my-c... you annotate it with: __attribute__((optimize("-ffast-math")))

I tried it with:

double sum1(double arr[128]) {
double tot = 0.0;
for (int i=0; i<128; i++) {
tot += arr[i];
}
return tot;
}

__attribute__((optimize("-ffast-math")))
double sum2(double arr[128]) {
double tot = 0.0;
for (int i=0; i<128; i++) {
tot += arr[i];
}
return tot;
}

The Compiler Explorer (gcc 13.2, --std=c++20 -march=native -O3) generates two different bodies for those:

sum1(double*):
lea rax, [rdi+1024]
vxorpd xmm0, xmm0, xmm0
.L2:
vaddsd xmm0, xmm0, QWORD PTR [rdi]
add rdi, 32
vaddsd xmm0, xmm0, QWORD PTR [rdi-24]
vaddsd xmm0, xmm0, QWORD PTR [rdi-16]
vaddsd xmm0, xmm0, QWORD PTR [rdi-8]
cmp rax, rdi
jne .L2
ret
sum2(double*):
lea rax, [rdi+1024]
vxorpd xmm0, xmm0, xmm0
.L6:
vaddpd ymm0, ymm0, YMMWORD PTR [rdi]
add rdi, 32
cmp rax, rdi
jne .L6
vextractf64x2 xmm1, ymm0, 0x1
vaddpd xmm1, xmm1, xmm0
vunpckhpd xmm0, xmm1, xmm1
vaddpd xmm0, xmm0, xmm1
vzeroupper
ret

It is still compiler-specific and non-portable, but at least it is not global.
I don't think this agrees with how the term is used. I've never heard of anyone being said to design a painting or a sculpture. Meanwhile, engineers are said to design things that aren't visible, such as algorithms or a circuits.
I would not use a written down version over a memorized version because it misses all the nuances of the piece. But a playable tool for Tabla would be useful for learning, for instance, polyrhythmic practice. As someone who started learning Tabla (and music) in my 30s, I don't even have the neurons in my brain for that kind of stuff. Just listening and playing along will be a huge aid in the absence of a live teacher.
It seems incredibly dishonest to not understand why governments want a cryptographic backdoor that only they can use.
Transclusion means that .a in this can escape the Shadow DOM: <my-element><div class="a">Transcluded content</div></my-element>

To do the same thing in CSS you would do <div class="myelement"><div class="slot"><div class="a">Transcluded content</div></div></div> @scope (.myelement) to (.slot) { /* rules that apply to .myelement but not .a */ }).
They're still running prehistoric Intel Xeons. I'm sure they'll just rot slowly until the instances fail.
The Walmart store associate absolutely has a duty not to sell you that DVD; while we can argue over the nature of the implicit contract you consent to when you buy something, it's almost certainly an explicit clause in Walmart's contract with, say, Paramount that they take all effort to limit piracy of content they sell to customers.
Electronic Instant Camera
Sharing knowledge and helping other people grow (through code review as well) IS “more important, and creative work”. So no, I’d like to keep it as human as possible and wouldn’t want to touch AI with a ten-foot pole for this purpose.
If you can't use the STL because of exceptions: https://www.etlcpp.com/
Looks interesting conceptually to tackle an OSS option here with Atlassian swooping in on Loom, though there isn't much code yet, been working on a loom alternative as well, and debating open sourcing it. What do you have working so far and for what platform? We've found a lot of funny nuances trying to get it to work for both windows and mac (and eventually linux). Lots of easy ways to kill perf.

How are you handling different platforms? Since i's open source are you thinking the link sharing will only be part of your paid product, or are you going to open source a way to host/share?

I think there's going to be a good opening here for an alternative since acquisitions like this into a larger company not known for UX is likely to slow things down, but we'll see. I like to think more about what would actually differentiate beyond just a Loom replacement. I think there's some cool stuff that they never tackled.
So you're probably familiar with the role of a Bidding Producer; imagine the difficulty they are facing: on one side they have filmmakers saying they just read so and so is now created by AI, while that is news to the bidding producer and their VFX/animation studio clients scrambling as everything they do is new again.
Classic Postmortem: GoldenEye 007
I read the article. It has exactly the same limitations as Polygen from what I can tell.
You show up to support the voices of others without taking time and mental/emotional space yourself.
Is this limited to shapes that have mostly flat faces?
The goalposts for intelligence always seem to change with each new foundation model that comes out. As long as people can understand the principles behind why a model works, it no longer seems intelligent.

hvsm bsjsf sldsqh fch tcifhssb
IBM 360/40

Oh, no...if you're gonna do it, make it something like the 360/91 or 360/195. The more blinkenlights, the better.

Cray 1

Didn't really have a front panel, tho. Several people have done a Cray-1 3d print case.

CDC 6600

Since the 'operator console' for the 6600 was a dual vector scope display (think giant oscilloscopes), this would be awesome.
> Will people still write code by hand once the machine is clearly superior at it?

Probably not for a living, though one can still do it for some sort of intrinsically-motivated fun.

Folks still enjoy doing woodworking and make boxes, tables, benches, etc. -- even though they could easily buy them new, used, or for pretty cheap (say, at IKEA).

Folks still enjoy making photorealistic sketches/paintings, more than a century after the invention of photography.

Folks still enjoy playing musical instruments and/or singing, even though recordings exist of the world's best musicians performing all the songs you might want to play.

Your observation is correct, though IMHO restricted to a professional context -- in the hobby/personal enjoyment space, I see no reason this should change things.
Q-anon isn’t a political party and doesn’t represent everyone in the political party that Q-anon mostly has association with
Maybe Internet cafes will become more of a thing again. The manager will verify you as a real human using their computers, and the Internet cafe itself gets audited.

Or imagine a Costco Metaverse Verification Center. You can play in a VR metaverse with other verified humans at other Costcos around the world. AR cameras on the headset will ensure you can see your $1.50 hotdog and soda combo so you never have to leave the metaverse. Costco would also provide you a sleep pod at cost if you want to plug back into the matrix right after waking up.
Solar Sales Bros Threaten the Green Energy Transition
Just add a menu to add some sample pieces.
Several MSFT employees I talked to mentioned that they didn't like working with IBM - too much of a culture clash from what I could gather.
What's your point? Are you against that they used deductive reasoning on an existing data set?
Sure, there are more embedded friendly libraries, but that wasn't the topic.
Yep, they're definitely still rising, despite a slight drop in 2020 (thanks, COVID). Not sure there's any point in talking about per-capita emissions.
That US emissions have been falling since ~2007 (and China appears to be leveling off) is some reason for hope but the likes of India, Indonesia and other large developing nations are more than making up for the difference.
> Currently, however, only a few top lawmakers know what the bill’s final text will say. The remaining conferees expect to receive a copy of the NDAA as early as Wednesday, but may have less than a day to parse what is typically over 1,000 pages of text. Party leaders will expect at least half of the conference to sign off on the bill quickly and send it to the House and Senate floor for a vote.

Ironically, on a per-token-consumed basis, one of the most societally impactful uses of LLMs may very well be giving lawmakers and their staffers the capability to actually be able to understand - and communicate with constituents on - controversial passages buried in laws they are voting on with little notice.

It's immensely sad to me that this is the case. But I suppose the next best thing to Alexander Hamilton writing the Federalist Papers to explain a legal document... is Alexander LLM being able to do the same.
I'll add to what the others have said with an example. The scenario at the start of the article is an example of passive aggression, but it's quite subtle and not explained until later on. Jim has made the effort of cooking pasta for him and Aaron. Carbonara in particular deteriorates quite quickly, so after 10 minutes it won't be very good. We see from the story that Aaron is stuck on the phone with work, and once he finally breaks free, the pasta is spoiled and Jim rather annoyed.

Where's the passive aggression? Later on, the article hints that before this played out, Aaron was annoyed at Jim. He intentionally spoiled the dinner (e.g disrespecting the effort Jim invested) by staying on the phone, but because he pretended to be unable to avoid the call it's passive — he can claim not to have spoiled it intentionally.

In contrast, it would be regular aggression if he'd thrown the pasta into the sink.
I kind of love this advice! I print a fair amount (but not enough). Certainly never considered the bonus set of shoes!
> Please don't use AI / LLMs (like GPT) to automatically solve a day's puzzles until that day's global leaderboards are full. By "automatically", I mean using AI to do most or all of the puzzle solving, like handing the puzzle text directly to an LLM. [...] (If you want to use AI to help you solve puzzles, I can't really stop you, but I feel like it's harder to get better at programming if you ask an AI to do the programming for you.)

If the writer wants to pollute their own event with this weak distinction, they can. My concern is that it's just feeding confusion and rationalizing about cheating in other areas.

Perhaps throughout the next 5 years it will be a cliche to hear "I didn't use the AI to cheat; I only used it as an aid." from cheaters.
https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2016/02/05/smart/
Yeah, and if there was going to be such a tool, people who invest more time in it would be better than those casually using it. In other words, professionals.
Tutanota, Filen.io, Internxt
It's on the FDA drug shortage list, that allows compounding pharmacies to sell it off brand.
The "writing code" part of coding has never been valuable in the first place, so AI isn't going to shake things up nearly as much as people think.

So you built an AI that can parse a perfectly written spec and produce code? The only thing that changed is that the person writing the spec is now a programmer.
Any amount of overhang is too much. It makes the edge of the container look bumpy and messy.

Even if you think it looks stylish, it nonetheless creates a semantic distraction: it makes paragraphs that start with quotation marks look different from paragraphs that don't, when there is no intended difference in meaning. It costs the reader effort to remember that things that look different are actually supposed to be the same, and reduces your dynamic range for visually conveying meaningful differences.

If you want to stylize a quotation mark or draw attention to it, make it a special graphic element, clearly outside the container. Be deliberate. But don't violate the container boundary by misaligning a quotation mark that's part of the text flow; that just looks like an error.
This is a great blog post, I feel that this level of database knowledge doesn't get enough coverage.

Maybe it's because most projects will never need it, but when you eventually do it feels like you're just left to yourself
How to Get Users and Grow: Alex Schultz Talk [video]
I think we'll eventually come to the conclusion that it's the wrong question.

What we really want is certain types of content, and to ban others. If we get that certain type from a bot, that's fine; if the type of content we don't want is coming from a human, it should still be removed.

By "type" of content, I mean very broadly. For instance one could create a community in which there's a limited number of posts/characters/etc. per day, not just be looking at the characteristics of the content itself. I mean all aspects of the content, data, metadata, all of it, as part of the analysis of "desirable."

If you want a pure-human community, put constraints on the community only humans can meet; heavy-duty, unscalable identity verification may play a role there.

As a bit of a "how do you build communities online" hobbyist, I think another trend we're going to see is communities getting faster on the draw to evict participants (originally wrote "people" here, but it's actually generically "participants"), for reasons beyond mere spam or active antagonism. Historically, I think it's a thing that most communities have done; the American/Western zeitgeist has disfavored that idea for a while in favor of expecting every community to take everyone who wants to join, but regardless of the ethics or philosophy behind that idea, I think that's just going to become simply impossible online. If the standard for participation in some community includes bots that won't be evicted no matter what they do, that community will rapidly become just another bot congregation ground and look like all the rest of them. With people roaming the internet for new communities to infiltrate with their bots, community building will become a subtractive process rather than an additive one. That's going to be a big change, it isn't going to be smooth or all good.
There are apparently 40 million prescriptions in the US alone. There'd be more if not for the shortages and price.
you don't actually want to nuke your IGF-1. it's important for metabolism, maintaining muscle tissue (also important for health in old age), and general quality of life. this is a lifespan versus healthspan thing, sort of like a lesser version of why eunuchs live longer.

we're increasingly seeing that mTOR/PPAR/metabolism aren't great targets for antiaging because you can't square the circle of worse quality of life over those increased years.
I think folks downvoted me for explaining the price and usage of my current tool - but the congrats on shipping was sincere. Getting something out in the world is hardest part.

Quick feedback:

There's a CSS / content bug on the sign up page. The google and github logos are present but no words. Screenshot: https://ibb.co/hRLvWy8

For me, the lack of keyboard shortcuts is a non-started for my immediate usage. I like to just slap stuff down and jump around vs spending time organizing and compiling. Mindmup is just as "awkward" with managing notes on nodes but the keyboard shortcuts are a real timesaver.

Have you seen Arrows.app?

https://arrows.app/

You might find some additional inspiration looking at another tool I used from Jason Koo that also uses arrows.app for generating graph data:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxO835DKzKs

https://mock-graph-data-generator-app-fjbvtm7qtyvs3f4ddeerz7...

https://github.com/jalakoo/mock-graph-data-generator-streaml...
I don't know if you can even say competent at this point. So many "AAA" games with their army of developers still launch with performance issues and bugs. If massive teams should be good at one thing, it is making a polished and well running product. But that doesn't seem to be the case. Devs cried for years to get the ability to make their own custom shaders. Now that DX and Vulkan allow it, we find they didn't know what they were asking for and every AAA game suffers from massive shader compilation issues. A problem that never existed when it was left up to AMD and Nvidia. You also don't see this problem in indie games because they never have the bandwidth to even consider writing their own shaders. And that's just one example.
Dystopia cancelled. /s

Ip68 is a mere 1.5 meters! It’s still a dystopia until we get iso6425.
They might jack it up by $10K or so but that still puts it in line with other passenger trucks. An F150 dual cab Lariat starts at $57K. Dual cab Tacomas with four wheel drive run at least $38K, but if you want leather seats and a nicer trim like Teslas come with, that typically runs $48K or more.
I guess it can depend but in my experience men solve interpersonal issues with noise and aggression, and it very quickly disappears after because it is addressed. I’ve noticed women do the exact opposite which makes them hate each other for years
I don't see the UB. Are you implying or assuming that x and y are defined in different translation units? That would be certainly be UB, but what you wrote doesn't look like that.

ETA:

from https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/siof

"The static initialization order fiasco refers to the ambiguity in the order that objects with static storage duration in different translation units are initialized in."

"Within a single translation unit, the fiasco does not apply because the objects are initialized from top to bottom."
I was expecting that the press release is exaggerating the claims in the paper, but the research paper says:

> This mathematical analysis and description represents the sought-for universal formula and is a significant step in understanding not only the egg shape itself, but also how and why it evolved, thus making widespread biological and technological applications theoretically possible.

As a 100% mathematician and 50% physicist, I think the claim is ridiculous.

(I was expecting a research paper that finds the stronger egg-shaped surface with some parameters. It looks like an interesting and perhaps difficult problem. The claiming that they got the "universal formula" is unbelievable.)

(Perhaps the math inside the paywalled paper is solid. Abstracts and Introductions many times have small exaggerations. This is too much for me.)
IMHO I don't think Google can. The mix of GPT4 and the ever worsening Google search that happen, even before the whole openAI revolution, pretty much killed Google for me. For the rest I use DDG.
Nostalgy++ shortcuts manager to move/copy/archive messages in Thunderbird
This add-on is indispensable for fast, keyboard based navigation and message management in Thunderbird.

It allows to copy or move messages with a single keyboard shortcut - for example "m", which opens list of folders, then type (part of) the name of target folder and press Enter. Pressing "M" will move another message to the same folder. "g" takes you to a folder and "G" goes to previously selected folder. You can customize the shortcut letters.

The list of folders pops-up fast, which is important (there are other add-ons providing similar functionality but there is a noticeable lag between key-press and the folder list appearing).

Recently it has been updated to TB 115. Hope you will like it like i do, enjoy!
Does anyone have examples of particularly "ruined" searches? I keep hearing about these examples but I've never encountered them any more than the SEO-optimized garbage blogspam of the 2010s.
To be honest I didn't know the FDA oversaw anything related to pet medication.

Cool product to learn about, large dogs are a blast a it would be lovely to have them live longer with us.
>Even so, the moral act would be to refuse to agree to the contract, not duplicitously agree to the contract with zero intent on doing what you claimed.

The moral (if you insist) act would be to not offer a nonsensical contract. If I want to do something and I have to agree to a nonsensical contract to do it then I'll agree to it and then do whatever I want. If the other party doesn't like then next time they can offer a reasonable contract, and if they don't I'll just do it again. Sorry, but you don't get my firstborn just because you put it in an EULA that I had to agree to when I installed your software.

>And no, watching Avengers: Endgame is not on the same moral level as freeing slaves. I will not cede that ground.

Interesting. However, the one who made a distinction between acceptable and unacceptable clauses in a contract was me. The way you posed your question in your last comment implied that you think that, if you've already entered into an agreement not to do it, pirating a movie and freeing slaves are ethically equivalent. It would seem that respecting your word to you trumps everything else, no matter what. If that's really what you think, then fine, I can respect that. However, if it's possible that you could enter into an agreement that would require you to act in a way that you find unacceptable and you would rather breach the agreement than act in that way, you will need to concede that what you find unethical is not breaching the agreement per se, but the specific manner in which the agreement is breached.

In other words, in such a case we have a simple difference of opinion. You think slavery is bad and pirating is bad (perhaps to different degrees, but still, they're bad), and I think slavery is bad and pirating is not bad. That there's an agreement or whatever else is just a distraction.
The T-shirt chewing enzyme ready to tackle plastic waste
The 'mind-boggling' Welsh road with eight speed limit changes within two miles
To combat your pessimism - I would point to podcasts. In general, these were distributed on free platforms. The content became profitable through sponsorships. That is, the content creator does a deal directly with a brand to include a spot within the content read out by the presenter.

So, there is a clear and well-trodden path to monetization for content creators even on free distribution platforms. Of course, as anyone who watches enough YouTube knows content creators double-dip on commercial platforms by including sponsorships and getting a cut of AdSense - so there is still a major advantage to also publishing on YouTube. But for the sponsorship, the value of the deal is related to overall reach across all platforms. That might give incentive for creators to release on multiple platforms, as long as the main commercial platform doesn't enforce exclusivity.
ChatGPT, server hosting (DigitalOcean) for a personal blog, Kagi Search
sorry! you don't owe me any work but if you have some notes somewhere I'd be delighted to read them. maybe email?
I'm someone who did this work for decades and am speaking from my own experience. You mentioned in another comment that your second-hand experience with this is from someone in a union. Which, sure, if I'd been able to find union cooking work maybe I'd still be happy over there.

As it was I was working 60 hour weeks while my teeth were rotting out of my head and I hadn't had a sunday off to go to church in four years. Regardless of the pride I took in my work I think I'm well positioned to describe it as draining.
In 2019, the target starting price was ~$40k. Given inflation and other factors that have wildly increased prices, as well as it more and more sounding like a "halo" vehicle, as well as the supply being a tiny fraction of demand, I'd be surprised if the starting price wasn't literally double that $40k. I guess we'll see soon.
I have faith that large corporations will not openly do things that would cause them billions of dollars in direct damages and billions of dollars in reputational harm, in addition to the criminal charges they would be facing in the E.U. for such an act.

Simply put, the story doesn't make any sense, and a deep dive into the Paw Patrol reddit forums didn't reveal any other person having this issue.
The thing that seems to be missed here is that passive aggression is a perfectly valid way to deal with direct and immature aggression, such as you get with personality disorders. Maintaining a level of deniability isn't always a bad thing. And any idealization of "direct aggressiveness" is just an excuse for psychopaths (or NPD, BPD, etc). Of which I've had enough in my life, thank you very much.

It's sad that much of the discussion here is effectively excusing fascism. Another case where passive aggression is a perfectly valid and mature coping mechanism.
I’m sure that naming a chatbot after a Star Trek godlike entity will not raise fears on superintelligent AGIs.