skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Careful, someone at Google reading this will green light a new version. Google has gone from talk to hangouts to meet and gotten even more proprietary with each iteration. I’m sure there is someone itching to create yet a new name/version that would have new draconian DRM. Heck, they might even try and bring something like ActiveX back if they knew it would make a users experience worse.
Maintainer of Perspective here - we have an enterprise version that does exactly what you ask for! https://prospective.co/
Will it support CUDA applications?
freerdp has some integration with Gnome and KDE, but yeah, it's work in progress still.
OpenAI's War of Succession – and What's Next
Interesting paper. Consequently, a similar approach is outlined in "How to Read a Book" by Mortimer J. Adler, which covers reading approaches for a variety of formats.
A fan favorite for sure. Still no word on range or price from the looks of it though. That will be the deal breaker for most.
The cyberbike!
I think it boils down to "because they can".
It's totally viable to create an entity in a jurisdiction where lawsuits are not automatically ruinous and stick to your principles.

On top of that, a small entity would not be as lenient about Google in terms of customer support or taking advantage of your personal data.
Intel Management Engine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine
What's New in Exograph 0.4
Every programmer knows the difference the language and the tools surrounding it. This seems like you're trying to create a pointless semantic argument for no reason.
Complete list of GitHub Markdown emoji markup
Last time I tried to use Wayland on my NVidia laptop it didn't work well, both with the proprietary driver and with Noveau. I can't remember the details and I have too many open apps to logout and try again now. I switched back to Xorg and forgot about it. It was January this year, Debian 11.
I like Vitalik but like a lot of tech leaders, his opinions on things outside of his expertise are not particularly insightful. The idea of mind uploading, for example, is taken as a serious possibility here, when in reality it's not much more than a sci-fi trope.

The 21st century may well be the pivotal century for humanity...

Every generation probably thinks this. And honestly, if I had to pick a major inflection point in recent history, it would be World War 2. The current world would be a lot different had the Germans or Japanese won. It seems to me that the current trajectory of world history is still just one extending from the 1950s.
Auther here - thanks for responding! I really do appreciate it.

> The trend seems to be in the opposite direction. People became frustrated with the lack of types in Python and JavaScript, hence we get Python with typing and TypeScript.

Regarding typing, what I have tried to achieve is the best of both worlds. In unify-jdocs, we have the concept of typed document. This is a document that defines the structure of the JSON document. It defines what the "type" of a leaf node is i.e. integer, string etc. The validation / determination against this type is however done at runtime. This, I feel is acceptable because whenever we add a JSON path to a document, the first thing we would do is to test the read / write of that path. And any type mismatch would get caught there immediately. And so, from the point of view of being able to read / write / validate in a single line of code (even though dynamically) provides much simplicity and ease of use as compared to using POJOs. Plus we always know the exact JSON path we are dealing with.

Usually, I would prefer static typing but, in a scenario, where we can have hundreds of JSON document types (we deal with more than 500 in the same application), complex JSON document (ours go down more than ten levels deep with hundreds of JSON paths) and where the document structures may undergo change over project lifetime, the use of read / writing using a single line of code has many benefits. I shudder to think of hundreds (if not thousands) of POJO classes, the writing of accessor methods (null / empty handling, namespace etc.) and what it would take to refactor in the face of change. Just my opinion based on my experience in the past.

> I think you will find less traction with this method of posting to HN. People want a clickable link to look at the project

The clickable link to the repo / documentation is actually in the text (https://github.com/americanexpress/unify-jdocs). In the case of this post, I felt it more important for people to read the text rather than be directly pointed to the contents of the link and hence this approach.
I know that was just one example, but I think you can view message headers in OWA by clicking the ellipsis on a message, then "View" > "View message details".

Also, my mom preferred Safari but kept Chrome around for installing and opening PWAs. I understand if there's a philosophical reason this won't work for you though :)
One of my first projects was an embedded thing, long before 2016, where the number of deployments was exactly one. (It was a ruggedized device embedded into an experiment that we literally dropped from an eight story building twice a day. The device in question did just fine, although, unsurprisingly, a bunch of the rest of the apparatus needed rather regular repairs.)

The development experience was miserable. The embedded code was in C, and, when something went wrong, there was about a 50% chance that the bug was in the proprietary compiler from the vendor and not in the C code at all.

There was probably some way to debug the live system, but I never found it. I’m not sure where was any way to simulate the system well enough to run our code short of actually uploading it to the device.

The world has come a long way :). An RPi or Arduino or anything else along those lines would likely also survive the treatment we gave this thing as long as all the connectors were very well secured.
Really liked the insights and story formats but just curious on how are you doing this without a DB tho ?
It doesn't even have to be ML-style option types. Kotlin is a great example of an alternative implementation that arguably has much better ergonomics for procedural and object-oriented code.
Must be all those stimulants they pop finally driving to psychosis.
An app on Apple TV may be valid and current today, but if it's playing streaming media, it may not be valid and current to get streaming content tommorow. Updates to the app or Apple TV firmware could include revocations such that tomorrow's required version will not authenticate with your inline device.
Yeah, I used to be a big fan of Z-Wave, but the effective price minimum is killing it. Zigbee and (eventually) Matter seem like the way forward.
As people get richer, as we stop starving and freezing, we prioritize the environment more and more. People in rich countries like green spaces and wild animals, are concerned about climate change, and invest massive amounts of money in environmentally friendly tech.

There's every reason to believe that this pattern will continue. As the world gets richer, we'll continue to develop the will to deal with various environmental problems. In the meantime, a certain amount of damage will be done, but it won't be irrecoverable.
Relational Deep Learning: Graph representation learning on relational databases [pdf]
Thanks for the feedback and sharing the link
With all due respect to the Factorio devs (it is one of my favorite games of all time and I credit them with essentially creating the genre), have they made even one other game?
> Is the purpose of this device to allow true 4k content to be displayed on an older 4k device, i.e. one that has an older HDCP version?

Yes. Or more specifically, content that the source has tagged "high value" which is often 4k.

> What was the purpose of including a 1080p TV in the test, if it could never display anything in HDR / 4k anyway, with or without the device?

From the article:
> I wanted to see whether or not there’d be a visual indication that the Fire TV was playing lower quality content.
> the big tech companies have billions just sitting around

They do?
... When did those days exist?
How Jensen Huang's Nvidia is powering the AI revolution
I do want code examples with the pretty dark syntax highlighting though
But most of them have runways made for small general aviation bugsmashers, not 707s.
I agree, but delays seem to be the norm with Matter.
Is there a DOI for this paper? Couldn’t find it
Why not RUST?

(I never use RUST but heard it has been touted as a better C++)
Relatedly, Mastodon is a) too hard for me to sign up for and b) a failed experiment. That the former was being repeated by people here still makes me chuckle.
https://archive.ph/wtM7s
You’re confusing concentration with amplification, and you’re not explaining how you think bed springs could cause concentration despite having no similarity in form or action to your examples.
I agree with your grievance: Many c++ tutorials are basically like: these are the internal workings of how the graphite in a pencil is structured, now go draw the rest of the owl.

I am not saying that this isn't important, but learning about pointers and references is totally useless unless someone shows you why you would use them, where you would use them etc.
I prefer zwave as well. As long as you have repeaters (pretty much any light switch) and a good hub (zwave js ui NOT the default one) you will be fine. I run about 20 nodes right now and upgrading to zwave js ui over the default fixed my node graph so everything had a good signal. I do want to see more thread around
Yes, these guys don't seem to understand what positivism is and why it isn't a perfect way of thinking about the world, especially when it comes to "transferring" consciousness to a piece of software.
3D printer can watch itself fabricate objects
I read this as "Please report bugs early in the RHEL 10 lifecycle so it can get fixed".
> I don't think so.

It does because you claim that the changes are "incremental" and they claim that there's an (unsubstantiated) "pain of upgrading". These two formulations are in contrast one to another. The pain of upgrading would be something that is substantial or complex and long-lasting. Incremental OTOH is considered something more trivial and something that can be done in much less time. Switching to C++17 is an incremental change but not an incremental release.

Since they have not given any substantiated reason for "we're still on C++11 because the pain of upgrading is larger than the promises of C++14/17", I'm afraid that this is a FUD by its very own definition:

FUD is generally a strategy to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information, and is a manifestation of the appeal to fear.

I hope it's clear now that giving false information with a negative appeal without substantiated content is not how it's done when it's done in good faith. I couldn't care less how they write software and in which language but bad arguments are bad arguments.
I'm not in the field but as a techie this attempt to be a universal solvent, to play well with everyone, looks extremely smart & extremely sharp. This is a highly compelling sell for me, and greatly boosts the chance that when I do start to dabble, I'll look at Keras.
> Thus, as we sleep on our coil-spring mattresses, we are in effect sleeping on an antenna that amplifies the intensity of the broadcast FM/TV radiation. Asleep on these antennas, our bodies are exposed to the amplified electromagnetic radiation for a third of our life spans. As we slumber on a metal coil-spring mattress, a wave of electromagnetic radiation envelops our bodies so that the maximum strength of the field develops 75 centimeters above the mattress in the middle of our bodies. When sleeping on the right side, the body's left side will thereby be exposed to field strength about twice as strong as what the right side absorbs.

Anyone have a link to the actual paper? I want to see the field strength readings they took above mattresses in real urban environments. If this were true then there would be an absolute epidemic of cancer within 1/2 mile of TV transmitters, where the field strength might actually be meaningful.

Aside from that, this article/paper goes to tortuous lengths to avoid the most obvious difference between Japan and the west (especially US): Diet.
Could you route the drains to plumbing lower down in the system? I'm picturing all wet rooms draining to a funnel in the basement via a dedicated gravity drain system. He did say 'custom home'....
Software in Debian 11 is now 2 years old as far as features and bugfixes are concerned.
Most end users don’t care about the “what if?” They care about the right now. What does this offer today?

Maybe I’m being unfair and this isn’t targeted at end users but professionals. Is that the case? Then the landing page makes a lot more sense.
"Humans are just glorified monkeys"...
I keep hearing this, but I don’t really understand what it means when you put it on the ground. Like people think tech will solve their problems or people actually use tech to improve their QOL?

If it’s the former, then I guess. If it’s the latter, in the past 10 years, it’s hard for me to imagine what tech made improvements to people’s lives in NA, meanwhile Europe and Asia has been chugging along. From simpler things like never needing cash when you’re in the country (I know, HN hates it), to building massive infrastructure in the cities which requires new tech.

Disclosure: I live in Canada, so can be completely wrong. I have family both in US and Europe, so I visit both very often. You can see gradual change in both, but it’s different.
All energy production is bad for the environment; methods labeled green or environmentally friendly are just less bad than the alternatives. Our society has shown a consistent lack of ability or will to address those problems. I've been hearing that we'll technology our way out of problems my whole life but our current way of life is as unsustainable as ever. Some areas have gotten better, but more have gotten worse.

I don't know if it's our society that cares little about future generations or simply human nature, but we're almost certain to keep living unsustainably until a major disaster happens.
MRI uses quite a lot RF, the coils are tuned to the B0 field frequency, there's a TX as well as RX. Commonly TX freq as at 63.87Mhz (1.5T) or 127.74 MHz (3.0T).

While most of the workers are well shielded from the room, but people have to be extra careful to not microwave heat your patient to much (usually +1C hotter). But don't worry too much, there's a SAR limit on it.

Most of the RF components, equipment, including our phones, are all strictly regulated by SAR (specific absorption rate). Each of them might be safe, but if you are having too many of them around you can be a problem (?).
My New iPhone Is Making Me Look Uglier
Why Navajo is the hardest language to learn
https://1ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlantic.com%2Ft...
I was heavily involved with the australian team fortress (quake 1 version) community in the late 90s and 'bro' (Robin Walker) and John Cook were gods to us, regularly involved in the RMIT/Melbourne Lan scene and online even when back then mostly it was 28.8/33.6k modems with a few LPBS on East coast uni isdns.

The struggle for them to move on from qwtf to 'tf2' was probably for the best as a lot of the lessons they learned in the wilderness there helped when they were taken on by value and worked on HL2.

Also find it somewhat amusing was that TF2 was originally going to be a much more 'realistic' modern miltary shooter before the scope creep killed it.
Graphics of the Amiga were just of another realm. It's how I would describe Fantasy.

While DOS Graphics were neat, DOS games however didn't grab the same awe.
Tech Conference Faces Backlash on Claims of Fake Women Speakers
Yep, and I admit I'm part of the problem. I'm not really sure how to break the addiction myself, I haven't even worried about any of this until the past few years, and I've been a fan of technology my whole life, buying video games and consoles and computers and other tech since I was 8 years old.
New cars are not in steel, but in aluminum, which does not rust (hence why metallic boat parts are in aluminum).
Europe's quest to lead in AI regulation is in serious doubt
Ugh, "...that won't be immediately ported..." sounds like they want to get rid of XWayland too at one point. Why don't they simply accept that some programs will never be ported to native Wayland APIs since Wayland implementations don't offer required features for some types of programs (like universal support for rendering consistent window decorations). With XWayland, X11 is just another client-side window system API, why not simply support that forever and why should it matter for application developers what happens below the X11 API shim? Especially since it is more feature complete and much less hassle than writing code directly against Wayland APIs?
> The idea that we're at some fundamental limit where we can't keep building technology without destroying the environment seems wrong.

It is wrong. Technology fundamentally requires the destruction of the environment, to make a spear you must nap flint and harvest a hard, straight stick. That’s resource destruction on a very small scale.

We have scaled up to Billions of people and near ubiquitous hi-tech. So the scale is what’s eating us, the earth is big, but 8 Billion people is a heck of a lot when every one of them requires highly refined goods.
I've got a bunch of Xiaomi Aqara Zigbee water leak sensors and they have alerted me to leaks which could have caused a lot of damage if not caught right away. The siren on this Ikea one is a very obvious improvement and the price seems to be in line with the Xiaomi sensors that I currently use.

The motion sensor looks like a decent improvement on the existing one. I have to admit that I don't have the battery life issues that many people seem to have with the current model, but I've only got two of these sensors so maybe I got lucky.

The door sensor looks weird though. It seems a lot larger than the equivalent Xiaomi Aqara sensor. Maybe it uses AAA batteries instead of coin cells or something.

Generally speaking, I really like the Ikea Zigbee stuff. Everything I've got is well-supported by Zigbee2MQTT, including OTA updates. Most of my Ikea stuff has never even been paired to Ikea's hub.
You usually say 2.5D when it's a 3D but only from a single vantage point with no info of the back-facing side of objects. Like the representation you get from a depth-sensor on a mobile phone, or when trying to extract depth from a single photo.
> What kind of plans for support of Rust's evolving async ecosystem?

We were hoping async-function-in-trait would land before GA, however, we have a plan to add support in a backwards compatible way when it's released.

> Any particular reason why the public roadmap does not show the columns similar to "Researching", "We're Working On It" like the other similar public AWS Roadmaps?

Our roadmap has unfortunately been in a state of disrepair for some time. We're hoping to get it cleaned up and accurate post GA.

> Would be nice to have fully working examples on Github, for most common scenarios across most AWS services. This is something that historically AWS SDKs have been inconsistent on. Just a request not really a question :-)

There are lots of examples here [1], some simple, some quite complex. If there's something you have in mind, please file an issue! Having great examples is one of our priorities.

[1]: https://github.com/awslabs/aws-sdk-rust/tree/main/examples
The great depression? My man we had 5% GDP growth last quarter after just seeing 15% unemployment 3 years ago. What the actual fuck are you talking about?
All good points. Perhaps you could add yourself as an "editor hook" into a publishing process for technical content. :P
I don't think I actually disagree with anything you're saying here.

I'm not really arguing exactly whatever is in the Limits to Growth book (I've heard of it but haven't read it), but I do think we are overutilizing resources faster than they can recover, and we can't just create a "make some new fossil fuels" or "make the sand that we need" tech at the scale that we would need to replace them.

Like fossil fuels for example, take millions of years for the planet to produce naturally, but we've burned through a good chunk of what is cheap to extract and process in about a hundred years.

I might be including two things that are a bit different from each other, but they all contribute to our ability to thrive as a species, especially at our (average) level of comfort and consumption currently.
I've been out of the ML game for a little while now (2+ years) but previously was under the impression everyone loved Keras. This thread says otherwise.

The only mentioned alternative so far is `ggml`, which I have heard mentions of but am not familiar with. What are other alternatives & their corresponding pros and cons? Now, I am familiar with:

- Tensorflow (complex API right?)

- Keras (simple API?)
you're 100% correct. it's written in a manipulative way
What is the incentive to self host when embedding YouTube videos is free and easy? Peer tube might make it easy but it adds a lot of maintenance complexity and server costs. Is the avoiding risk associated with YouTube over the video control worth that cost? For some maybe, but most I imagine not.
This should be the replacement for most of the legacy X-based (like for example Toger VNC) remote desktop tools:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop
https://www.mankier.com/1/grdctl

This is already available in Fedora in some capacity. Main focus seems to be on RDP, with some support for VNC as well.
See, this is why I love HN. You can pull the most ridiculous, obscure, unlikely thing out of the air... like "ordering log splitter plans from Popular Mechanics magazine ads" or whatever... and without fail, there will be somebody in the comments who actually did that. And then actually built the thing. And upgraded it to an even higher level!! You can't beat this place. :-)
> and Russian media can point to Finland's response as another example of "unfriendly western actions against Russia"

They do that 24/7 anyway so who cares. It's a joke here in Bulgaria that if somebody coughs and sneezes the Russians will say "they got cold because of the hostile Western nations!" and I find the joke hilarious because it's 100% on point. Whatever happens in the world, they are the first to react and immediately spin it as a sign of weakness or power play of the Western nations.

They are going full throttle on the propaganda and media influence war and I have to say, with some success here and there.

But them blaming everyone but themselves is nothing new, historically. Most people with a basic grasp of culture and history are not impressed by Russia's same old tricks.

> decision to close ALL border points seems questionable in its own right

And what would you do?

Let's assume for the sake of the argument that Russia does indeed use illegal immigrants in an attempt to sow chaos. How would you counter that? Not like many of these people want to integrate -- many of them can't even read or write... And no this is not a conspiracy theory, a lot of such cases have been documented but for one reason or another rarely make the popular headlines (as a side topic, I am really curious as to why).