skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
i feel sorry for people who uses docker.

falling for marketing or non critical group thinking, and then learning of their bad choices piecemeal for years on
> - Performance: Even on Desktop, animations have jank. Last I compiled samples on Mac, the problem was visibly there.

This problem is mentioned whenever Flutter is discussed.It's been several years already. Seriously, they have a ton of smart people there, how it's not their number one epic? Unless, well, it's an architectural problem and nothing can be done - but then why continue the project at all?
Formatting wise this is a very poorly made figure. I sincerely hope this is not the current standards for what’s considered to be a good journal nowadays.
Very normal realization. Also a healthy one i think. If you enjoy programming on side projects, do it. I stopped chasing fullfilment in my dayjob. Feels good.
Yes, adding to the list:

- blocking a sightline that pedestrians need to safely cross the road

- blocking a dropped curb that wheelchair/pram users need in order to mount and dismount the curb

- parking on the pavement so that wheelchair/pram users can't fit between the car and the wall, forcing them to go around on the street and putting them at greater risk

- damaging/cracking the surface because it is designed for foot traffic, not heavy vehicle loads

- intruding into a bus lane or bus stop, thereby causing delay for public transport passengers

If you only ever drive places, you tend not to think about the consequences of bad parking, because you don't suffer them yourself. But I don't drive, so I notice this antisocial ruining of the public commons all the time. Motorists are not good judges of which rules "really matter".
Noise cancelling headphones need to listen to ambient sound to cancel out the sound, plus you can use them in voice chat.
> they're called juniors and every other industry has seniors to help guide them and ensure they don't make major mistakes.

> Except in our industry. In our industry the juniors often are the ones making the decisions.

"Except in our industry". Said after "every other industry has seniors to help guide them and ensure they don't make major mistakes".

I speak perfect english, dumbass. You need to read your own words because you said seniors mentor jrs. Except in our industry. And then closed with a sentence unrelated to everything else you said, "in our industry the juniors often are the ones making the decisions", which has dick to do with mentoring, the thing everyone else had been talking about up until that last line.
Il Xiaomi 13T sbloccato e senza branding è un concentrato di potenza e versatilità nel mondo degli smartphone. Dotato di un display AMOLED da 6,67 pollici, questo telefono offre una straordinaria esperienza visiva per immagini nitide e colori vibranti.

Ciò che distingue il 13T è la sua tripla fotocamera co-ingegnerizzata da Leica, con un obiettivo principale da 50 MP che cattura dettagli sorprendenti e immagini nitide. La presenza di un teleobiettivo con lunghezza focale di 50 mm offre un effetto bokeh naturale, mentre l'obiettivo ultra grandangolare consente di catturare scenari mozzafiato.

La partnership con Leica si manifesta anche attraverso stili fotografici come Leica Authentic e Leica Vibrant, offrendo contrasti accurati e colori vibranti. Inoltre, l'interfaccia utente della fotocamera presenta watermark Leica e filtri che aggiungono un tocco distintivo alle tue immagini.

La modalità Pro della fotocamera permette di regolare manualmente i parametri di scatto, supportando scatti DNG RAW a 10 bit e offrendo la possibilità di registrare video LOG 4K a 10 bit. Questo smartphone è in grado di soddisfare le esigenze degli appassionati di fotografia grazie alla sua precisione e alle capacità professionali.

Il Xiaomi 13T 8GB+256GB è una scelta eccellente per chi cerca un dispositivo performante, in grado di offrire scatti di qualità professionale e un'esperienza visiva di alto livello.
> I think it's just what you're used to.

If most of the mainstream programs work the same way, there's an age old set of UI/UX axioms for developers of competitor programs:

1. The users aren't wrong, <<you are wrong>>.

2. If you think you aren't wrong, <<you're still most likely wrong>>.

3. And if you still think aren't most likely wrong, <<show me your usability studies>>.

Open source programs basically have 0 usability studies because they don't have money for them, so this argument basically dies at step 4:

4. <<Shut the f** up user, I'm giving this away for free>>.

:-)
20 minutes of top up to last you 2-3 hours of driving (assuming 100km/h highway speed) is very ambitious/optimistic for the range most average EVs and the charging speed of most chargers.
For me, the relentlessly changing gimp gui is what drives me nuts.

I need to use it, every so often (once a year, but for a week or more), and every couple of years, options move, settings change, everything.

And it always does seem to do things in a weird way.
It's hardly vacuous. What about these scientific advancements?

1. Fossil fuel extraction -- we are killing our planet.

2. Plastic chemistry -- there are 5 trillion pieces of plastic in the ocean killing seabirds, turtles, fish (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111913)

3. Concrete engineering -- building cities that move people away from a connection with nature

4. Veterinary medicine -- supporting global meat industry that is akin to torture on animals

5. Vehicle engineering -- capable of making vehicles that can kill MILLIONS of square meters of forest.

Our technology allows us to live comfortable lives but ONLY at the EXPENSE of millions of nonhuman animals (wild and domestic) that are KILLED every single day for our comforts. We dish out untold violence every second for our advancements.
>GIMP not so. Its an ancient carved releic from the days of GTK2.

If memory serves, GTK stands for GIMP Tool Kit.

That is to say, GTK exists specifically to give GIMP a GUI.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK#Linux
Sure, Society in its majestic equality will allow rich and poor people alike to rent a new bio-heart with youthenating agents for 1 million dollars a month.
Why not, if they're positive EV?
There was quite a bit of technology and know-how transfer in the field of rocket engine design. The did not start from scratch.
I'd be ready to bet good money that the situation I describe is much more common, across the whole continent, than the one you describe. Benelux and Nordics will always be ahead in this kind of thing, but you're also very much in the minority.
Breathing Life into Sketches Using Text-to-Video Priors
Ask HN: AI Copywriting Tool?
killing thousands of children deliberately is genocide
There is no royal we here. There never is. So, the right question is can you (indidual, country, company, etc.) afford to have your rivals, competitors, enemies, etc. gain the upper hand here? What these have in common are that they take decisions independently from you. Basically, no matter how hard upset AI skeptics stamp their feet in California (or wherever) insisting on whatever convoluted doomsday scenarios, somebody is going to go ahead and ignore them and go right ahead anyway. Given that, AGI is basically going to happen. Possibly sooner rather than later. The only real question is who gets there first and where and how.

AI safety is a bit like nuclear arms safety. You don't get any safer by not having any nuclear weapons; you just put yourself at the mercy of others with nuclear weapons. The reason nuclear war fare so far hasn't happened is mutually assured destruction. That's why lots of countries seek to have them. Non proliferation treaties have slowed that down but there are probably at least ten or so countries with nuclear weapons at this point.

With AI, it's a lot less clear cut. It's basically going to be about dominance and outsmarting the other side. The downsides are basically more hypothetical / ethical / moral. And when it comes to ethics and morals, there definitely is no such thing as royal we. Countries like China and Russia are likely to choose their own path. Plenty of other countries that will want to get ahead here.
> Yeah GIMP has it's issues but GP is influenced by vendor lock-in.

He mentioned Krita as being better 2 paragraphs in, how does "vendor lock-in" make any sense here?
Hmm I think for AGI, we might need some artifically generated biological neurons / brain matter. Combined with cybernetics. but it should be able to reconfigure neurons. either by removing chunks and replacing it with new chunks.. or have some nano machines work on the brain matter

OK I see where this is going...
Darktable needs the tantacrul treatment. https://www.youtube.com/@Tantacrul

Maybe Pierre can pull it off himself. He’s clearly knowledgeable and has strong convictions and Darktable is incredibly powerful, so I’m hoping the good bits from either camp can be reconciled into something lasting, minding the bus factor.

Darktable’s issues and lack of coherent stewardship is quite noticeable.
Most people don't live in houses like in the UK so they can't charge at home overnight.

If there's street parking then there needs to be street charging but nobody has really found a mass solution to that. The cities need to build that but they aren't.

If you don't have a charger at home or at work you're screwed.
> GIMP has existed long before the entitled generation of Linuxers who wish for everything to be handed to them on a golden plate.

I've been there before the golden platter, and the Gimp UI was mediocre even back then. And even underneath, Gimp is at best bronze, I wouldn't call it gold :-)
This reads like a combination of pessimism and nostalgia has allowed you to cherry pick the worst of now and the best of the past and conince yourself it is net bad.

I see all of these negatives, and agree it is clear there is much that is bad in the world (there always has been) and much to be improved (ditto), including new problems created by science, technology, and human greed & selfishness. But I also see many positives and benefits, I see many problems that used to exist and don't anymore, and I see much evidence that we continue on average, to make progress. When I look to the past I do not wish I lived there.

Science have many times saved my friends and families' lives or enabled them to live more fully after an accident or sickness

Science made climate change possible but greed, raw capitalism, etc. put us on the path there. Science makes it possible to find a way out, slow or even reverse it eventually, and mitigate the worst results.

Populations are shrinking in developed countries despite people living longer.

Computers and the internet created and connected many new communities, too. The negative effects are again often the result of unbridled capitalism. Young people especially are fighting back against the negative effects and taking control, building technology to manage those hamrful effects.

etc…

I believe both that:

(a) it is not possible to stop humans acquiring and using knowledge, advancing science, developing technology, and evolving culturally and socially; and

(b) we shouldn't want to, even though it means we will create new problems and lose (or consign to a smaller "museum exhibit" role) some aspects of the culture and societies we have today, because on balance we will solve more and bigger problems than we create and build better and more interesting cultures and societies than those of the past.

It's not without existential risks, but those are overstated or analysed pseudoscientifically at best, by many of those (and certainly the loudest) who worry about them.
You're*
I wonder if domain modeling crowd doesn't end up doing just this.

That said, the lib first approach was made a goal in clojure land, and sometimes it adds some choice/integration fatigue.
When Yudkowsky says that it’s an acceptable outcome to be left with a minimum viable breeding population after a nuclear war, triggered by enforcement of AI slowdown demands, that is as far from non-violent you could get without someone actually being threatened directly.

The AI doom cult is not a peaceful movement. When an extremist tells you what they will do, you damn well listen to them.
DI.fm feels like they are going to just fold at any time. They had a big three day outage a month or two back. They couldn't be bothered with any kind of redundancy in their infrastructure and a single podunk datacenter outage took them out.

None of their channels that I listen to have had playlist changes in the last three years.

I removed my autorenew a few months back and my subscription is finally going to end here in just a week or two, but I've not really been listening anyway. I've been buying albums and going through my list of artists that I've wanted to check out for awhile and getting my listening done that way.
Here‘s the same spot in Apple Maps: https://imgur.com/a/PBFIP1d

It seems to do a better job at always showing street names if you are zoomed in. I didn‘t even think about using Apple Maps when I ran into this issue but it seems to do a better job at this.
> Whereas for myself and most of the C programmers I know, Zig has sort of filled that similar space and seems to take the concerns of C programmers more seriously and the team has an attitude more in line with the C culture than the Rust team does.

I agree. In general I think Zig makes lot more sense as a C replacement for the kernel.

However, Rust is stable, and Zig isn't. And I don't expect it will be for some years. So at this point Zig is basically unusable for kernel work.

That doesn't mean it can't be added in the future though, and perhaps even overtake Rust. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26815950
This. We have not exhausted all the techniques at our disposal yet. We do need to look for a new architecture though, but these are orthogonal
Uppercase is strongly discouraged at HN, suggest you switch to italics.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
A lot of these should come with the caveat that they are not an option for most people. Heck, most of these either involve spending money or outright paying someone (anywhere from three to six figures) to do something for you. The more affordable versions of "hire someone" boil down to offloading work to a lower income country or finding someone willing to do your work for less.

> Treat fines like payments

While true, this is literally "if the punishment is a fine, it's only illegal for poor people".

> Be a nomad

Having spoken with true nomads (i.e. not expats just remote work-cationing in one popular location like Thailand) this is actually exceptionally complicated and expensive, especially if you don't want to pay double taxes. And of course you still need to be able to get a visa for each country in the first place. If you have the requisite money however you can effectively bypass most taxes this way though as long as you don't settle down.
> Yes the common argument is about the UI and which one where that Blender and Krita are both the new kids on the block. They were started from scratch with the ability to have a clean UI.

Yeah... talk about defending a lost cause.

Krita was launched 18 years ago. That's still a lifetime in software years.

Gimp was launched... 25 years ago. 7 years is a reasonably long time in software years, but it does <<not>> excuse a bad UI.
It’s all about happy vs decomposing ratio
Nuclear weapons and climate change are not on a path to destroy civilization. Such an interpretation is obvious hyperbole.
Yep, a good example is the element X rewrite

They use Jetpack on Android

https://github.com/vector-im/element-x-android

And SwiftUI on iOS

https://github.com/vector-im/element-x-ios

But both use the same underlying Matrix Rust SDK

https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-rust-sdk

So they share the core part of the app between platforms, but everything user facing is native
Your profile says "I am not rabidly against technology, but I promote a BALANCED, severely critical look at it"

"Humanity should give up this useless development of AI"

So balanced.
Even so, the "new kid on the block" Krita that's mentioned there is... 18 years old. The comment makes it sound like it's an Electron/React app from 2021.

Krita is old enough to drive, to drink (in civilized places), to vote.
I have the feeling that concepts like money and property fit your description, with the addditional detail that much more than humanity has been impacted. I also feel that AI has a pretty good chance to be the only way to revert the significant material / psychological damages that have already been caused by those. It seems short sighted to not weight in the whole of our "playing god" so far, and dismiss the idea that we might better defer-to/get-help-from a different intelligence at this point.
If I could give you a million upvotes I would. Heck I could somehow give you a billion upvotes, I would, even if would cost me my account.

Comments like yours restore my hope in HN whenever I start feeling like the community is being taken over by people whose thought processes are flirting on the edge of lunacy.

Imagine someone saying some diseases shouldn't be cured. I'm sure the millions of people all over the world who right now are suffering heart-rending pain from those "shouldn't be cured" diseases would be just thrilled to read the parent comment.

Jeez!
In the UK there are lots of 50kW chargers. A lot of major services have 130kW+ and there are a few 250kW.
Margin system incompatible with boxing. Poor borders and outlines. No general classes for hierarchies because of selector overlap. Non-strict containment. Chaotic size request/allocation rules. No relative-to sizing and positioning. No scroll target margins. Resistance to add obviously popular features for decades.

The main problem with css is that with all its complexity it underdelivers and so requires various, incompatible, non-reusable and fragile hacks to make it work.

You didn’t mention specific features, but I assume it’s media queries. That’s unrelated, css is broken at its core.

Every solution that is presented as simpler is simpler because it limits options.

Every other layout solution I’ve used had infinite options due to trivial programmability on top of basic functionality, which wasn’t as poor as css’s and was closer to “get job done” because it was made for it and not as an afterthought.

Anticipating “but they can’t wrap at width breaks!”. Yes, these were never targeted at low-width portrait screens, but that’s not the point. Css sucks long before the “responsive” keyword hits requirements.
For me it's mostly vibe and ambiance issue with the restaurants. "Fast food" restaurants that serve your meal quickly are usually friendly to single person.

Maybe a community curated list of places that are friendly to solo diners would be helpful? I have a few that I visit often.
I think the map view is missing a mode view.

Directions has mode because they are very different for car, bike, walking and public transportation.

Map view for biking should be very different from map view for cars as high ways are not usable for bikes and bike paths should be more prominient (while useless for cars).

Ditto for walking that also have different paths.

Using the map for "getting somewhere" is a very different purpose that "seing what's here". They need different modes.
I find the omission of the term "face reading" from the punch line "medical face reading" to be a curious editorial choice
Internal Developer Platform (.org)
I'm studying the area of IDPs and was happy to stumble on https://internaldeveloperplatform.org/
It was specifically refreshing to see they also promote solutions where the IDP is a hosted service and not an in-house set up (so "internal" but "external"...)
Some very good resources there and a good range of solutions from Coherence to Platform.sh - different approaches but in many cases similar objectives and result - make life easier for developers when setting up new preview environments and production projects.
Ah, I thought you were encouraging service based development, I see you're on the 'library' side. My bad.
As someone who's used gimp for more than 10 years because it covers all my needs without issues, and I can work reasonable efficiently because I've already memorised its UI and quirks...

Yes, the frustration most people have is because Gimp has made actually bad choices about placement and design of its features, not just that they took a different path.

At this point I've got muscle memory for many things, but I still sometimes find myself frustrated about the UI being so bad.
And probably 20% faster on Clear linux
He does argue in a borderline hysterical way on many occasions.
It's not clear from the article whether it's a dense model or MoE. This matters when it comes to comparing with GPT-4 - in terms of # params - which is reported to be MoE
Funnily enough you inspired me to try Apple Maps and it did a better job. The last time I ran into this issue I didn‘t even think about Apple Maps since it’s much worse in the things I use Google Maps for in my location. But now I know where to look up street and river names.
Changed emphasis.
Lights Out is a game where you have to turn off all the white cells
> This attitude is inspired by the desire to sell more, and often times, it means to sell more unwanted crap, where customers are trapped by the "package deal", where they are either forced to update to gain useless features and the headache resulted from various inconsistencies and defects coming from the last update, or they are unable to get the product at all (because the provider cancels support or wouldn't sell older versions etc.)

Selling more is how service providers are able to sell their generic service at a lower price than the cost you would incur by building it in-house. In other words, being forced to upgrade to accommodate features that other users want is the price you pay for sharing the development cost with those other users. That's not shady.
This isn't an issue with needing a fork that uses less memory. You're loading hundreds of thousands, if not millions of urls into memory so they can be compared to every single dns request happening. Text, even compressed, requires a certain amount of bytes to store, and there is no way to use less memory beyond that point, it's literally, physically impossible. Are there memory gains in adguard? Probably. But I doubt enough to magically make your 128MB of memory defy physics and hold more than 128MB of bytes. Doesn't matter what those bytes are, or how efficiently you made them, that physical rock can only ever handle 128MB of those bytes
A good lawyer will rarely outright tell you something is a crime or not. An accountant may tell you not to do something because it's illegal. A lawyer will instead focus on how good a case could be made against you and what the tradeoff would look like.
> Blender and Krita are both the new kids on the block. They were started from scratch with the ability to have a clean UI.

> Blender

What? Blender's codebase is about as old as GIMP's is. Up until recently (IIRC the 2.80 release in 2019), it was also constantly criticized for it's horrible UI/UX compared to its proprietary competitors.

If anything, Blender is a great example of UI refactoring over time gone right, and opens up the question why GIMP isn't able to pull off the same.
Yep, I have a couple titanium watches too. I find that the scratches picked up every here and there adds to the "character" of the piece. Like it's living life with me.