skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It really says something about how broken US politics are. Removing these bans would benefit basically everyone who doesn't own or work for a dealership. A quick google search says roughly 1M people work for car dealerships (a number that is kind of staggering actually, and is likely that large because of how much money is artificially funnelled into it due to the regulation). I suspect we can neglect the number of people who own dealerships. With 300M people in the US, that's 1:300 in favor vs against this regulation. And yet because the real votes in the US are cast with dollars, not ballots, this will likely never change.
The absurd statement is not decolonization but the implied causal graph, which is not a DAG, incidentally, as it is cyclical.
I think they meant that the conservative politicians are college-educated.
Inflation means that many people also earn more money. In the US that seems to be mostly at the bottom end for now though.
Upvoted because converting dialogue into old-timey 19th century style prose was one of my favorite uses of GPT.
You will be kindly asked to log in with Google everywhere, for your convenience and security.
Having worked at Red Hat and worked on many Docker / Kubernetes systems I agree with some parts of the article, but my view is that the wrold is going through a transition phase right now of moving to containerised systems.

Take for example running something like 3Scale (an internet gateway) in Docker or Kubernete. It can be a nightmare to configure and run 3Scale using containers with the multiple memory limits and other container specific issues. Far easier to get 3Scale running without containers.

So many software systems were not designed in the Docker era, and going forward many container applications will be designed to be easier to configure/use in the Container world due to a "Container/Docker native" mindset when designing the system in the first place
The worst thing is that many countries fail to produce staple food of the population instead depend on other countries and blame them when they fail to secure the produce.
My Chinese tech co has massive need for UXR for overseas markets
The legal situation for generated nudity is better in the US than most other countries. You can't accidentally create illegal CSAM in the US.
> Which is to say that VC's often chase very high-risk ways of getting growth even in cases where they know it's just a question of time before valuations will collapse, because most of them are in the business of producing returns, not sustainable companies, and many of them are "dumb money". It's a tough business. I spend a few years in one, analysing the track records of other funds among other things, and I saw so much stupidity in that dataset.

This is a highly logical approach by VCs simply due to their business model of only needing one hit out of hundreds to make a positive return. Reading a recent article called Why You Shouldn't Join YC [0] was quite illuminating with regards to this fact. It is the ergodicity that kills most startups, which is exactly what VCs capitalize on. Personally, most of the counterarguments in the HN thread do not move me, of course a startup might pivot but they need not do it based on the VCs' insistence.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37869760
Never experienced the steam myself, although I can't say I've ever tried supercharging the car at 5F. Coldest I've ever done it was probably in the 40s, which is plenty cold enough to cause that popping sound when it's pulling 250kW.
If I were a conspiracy nutter I'd ponder the daemon name and Apple's plan to scan for child porn.

In the 2000's, Windows Explorer on Windows XP had a feature to preview media files, but when it encounters a large video the system doesn't have a codec for...
Securecouponcodes.com is down. Was looking for PHP example.
I've tried to read it about 5 times over the last 20 years or so. Never made it past the first third or so of the book. Something about the way it is written is just so unappealing to me that I'd rather give up than finish. One of these days I might just read the synopsis.
Unless you're traveling in pick hours and the train is so overcrowded that you can't even lift you hand inside...
Autocomplete models and LLMs do literally use the same model architecture, but since transformers are universal function approximators, they may not be representing the same function.
I saw a video claiming that Germanic words beginning with sn- all have to do with the nose. For example “snoop”, “snob”, “sniff”, “snarl”.
We must have seen different movies, because this one didn't showcase any of his genius. Instead, they opted to show an unambitious little man (not talking about his height) whose fortunes are pushed forward by others rather than himself. Very odd indeed.
Are you saying employers care deeply about the 3 year gap or don’t?
> be on the lookout constantly for hallucinations, or omissions a person wouldn't make.

---
Why is the sky red at dawn?

The angels are baking, honey!
---

You give a lot of credit to people
You can look at it two ways. Either you see it as a reflection of Lucas' own values or desires. Or you see it as part of an artistic process, aiming to evoke emotions in the audience. In the first case, it is creepy. But to give example of the second case, this is the entire premise of a film like Lolita.
>If the tool can generate the efficient methods of achieving a result, I think it becomes obvious that one shouldn’t be able to protect it via IP law.

Why does that only hold when the result in question is in software? Machines are just tools for achieving results.
However it can't be produced at the same scale and flood the Internet with misinformation or disturbing imagery at the same rate
Also the non BO gene!
I’m missing something — why would a newly created Ubuntu server be any better or worse than any other system for developing Haskell?
>But I haven't considered printing code out since the early 90s.

TFA says he had documentation printouts, not code listings. That I can relate to; when learning something new or unfamiliar it's nice to be able to flip back and forth through the physical copy, make annotations, etc.
Dependencies Belong in Version Control
I don't know if this is normal or if anyone else does it but I usually either download binaries or compile from source and move the executable to /usr/local/bin/ and create a symlink. Lets me easily switch between versions. I avoid using a package manager for anything where I want control over the version and installation.

- curl -fSLJO $RELEASE

- tar xvf $DOWNLOAD.tar.gz && cd $DOWNLOAD`

- make .

- mv $EXECUTABLE /usr/local/bin/$EXECUTABLE-$VERSION`

- ln -s /usr/local/bin/$EXECUTABLE-$VERSION /usr/local/bin/$EXECUTABLE

- # chmod 750, chown root:$appuser, etc

Works great for everything I've tried thus far. Redis, HAproy, Prometheus exporters, and many more.
Presumably GP was implying that adding a second plane increases the chance of a crash, not claiming that it increases the conseuqences should it happen
It's the present and greater future of trustless, not trust.

Certain long term projects are already trustless, non custodial working solutions, a rug pull like this could not take place if let's say the funds was placed in some audited ethereum smart contract where the owner signs rewards and the middlemen here bountysource automatically receives a cut of the payout.

It isn't enough to stamp crypto or blockchain on a solutions to make it trustless hence safe. Let's concede a majority of crypto/blockchain gigs are not trustless, not really decentralized . Yes rug pulls do happen often in this context.

There is currently over 40 billion dollars worth of tokens owned by an aggregate of millions of self custodians, across DeFi alone on the biggest blockchain, in what is called a crypto winter. Funds are there, volume is flowing.

This blockchain France or whatever entity was running bountysource was a non blockchain shody business that stole from newpipe and many others, crypto could in fact have easily prevented that
My contention is that "if ChatGPT was invented in the 17th Century" there is a much higher possibility that Language gets stuck as the number of future tokens produced by AI in that thought experiment crowd out human generated tokens.
Because you can patent a machine. The argument is that software is "just math" (because it literally is just doing binary arithmetic) and mathematics cannot be patented.
Great, But \ is ugly
I’m not going to test that one because I’ll admit to a crack in my argument here, and that is that it’s possible OpenAI shuts down accounts that go too
far.

User awareness of this kind of possible threat could have a chilling effect to be sure.

If I had a throwaway account I would try it. Racial slurs wouldn’t be useful to me, but I get it that you’re just using it as an example and perhaps the point is generalizable.
I'm disappointed this is not from Netflix.
Maine's ayuh/ayup is cited. An example is halfway through this video: https://youtu.be/ftZYb5HGDlI?si=BE5Jf-FZsJN6cVi3
Yeah they really should have checked out the Helm synth before they named the Kubernetes thing!
I saw the idea in a link and a discussion here on HN about a year ago:

G-3PO: A protocol droid for Ghidra, or GPT-3 for reverse-engineering - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34250872 - Jan 2023 (44 comments)
Yes even the original author of tweet acknowledges it https://twitter.com/vishnuhx/status/1727796397150224518
> Isn't the issue specific for server use? Are you running random images from the internet on your servers?

Well exactly, there's what the author is writing about.

The whole article is dedicated to the problem of Docker being used as a distribution method, that is as a replacement for say Debian package.

So in order to use that software you need to run a Docker image from the internet which is open poorly made and incompatible with your infrastructure. Had a package been available you'd simply do "apt-get install" inside your own image built with your infrastructure in mind.
Does it matter ? It is like duck typing , If it looks like blood to a human and to AI both it should be tagged NSFW ?

It is not about what it actually is, only what the human viewer will think it is, training a model on that shouldn’t be that hard , we are predictable creatures when it comes to this kind of thing
How does a cash flow positive org go insolvent unless they are fucking around with users money and speculating with it or betting on it?
I’m both baffled and enthused that there is a study on exactly this
I'm thinking battery life and heat.

The SteamDeck is also a giant device compared to a Switch.

A ton of progress has been made with Box64, I imagine a corporate effort would yield even better results.
I wouldn't bank on that information not getting out. It may even be easy to reverse-engineer. Sqid says not to use it this way.
Love the intro to self-hosting your email, but aren't you going to be flagged as spam by the main providers anyhow?
You can extract the timestamp from UUID7/8 so it also can reveal business information.
> Performance is same as JS

Is there a source?
I thought National Semi was the company founded/run by that renown dirtbag CEO who among other things told some nuns to eat shit, but that was actually Cypress Semi

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._J._Rodgers
Hungary's new Sovereignty Protection Authority can investigate nearly anyone
The point is to make a long number more human-friendly. But I don't get why these are non-sequential then.
Ask HN: Notification UX is broken universally. How can someone repair this?
I hate the way notifications bug me. But I don't think I can live in today's world without receiving any notifications. Think of transaction alerts, messages from the boss, and some catastrophic events happening to my servers!

Notification is something that is 100% useful yet totally annoying! Lol.

How do you think notifications could be fixed for the modern world?
If nothing else, it seems pretty silly to have the stolen source accessible from the new work computer. That's just asking for the ruse to be detected too easily (automated backups, virus scanning, etc which could fingerprint the data). Keep the illicit goods on an air-gapped, encrypted, personal computer that you can reference as required.

As far as I know, they were never able to find the Waymo files that Anthony Levandowski stole, because he was at least crafty enough to not load everything directly onto Uber hardware.
Concurrent Processing with Xargs and Parallel
You must only have incredibly boring and orthodox and unoffensive thoughts..!

Or be independently wealthy, with your well-being entirely independent of the opinions of people with power over you.

The rest of us have to watch what we say.
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

Personal attacks are particularly unwelcome and will get you banned here, so please don't do that.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Really nicely written, thanks
That's just what I was thinking too haha. Honestly I really like the rest of the syntax though. (And of course, the type system features look neat but it's easier to have an opinion on syntax.)
Correct, we offer indexing[0], regexp[1][2], and FTS5[2].

We've put a lot of effort into security hardening (e.g. disabled swap entirely, disabled usb-storage devices, disabled core dumps, disabled apport, etc).

[0]: https://github.com/forwardemail/forwardemail.net/blob/ef67fe...

[1]: https://github.com/forwardemail/forwardemail.net/blob/ef67fe...

[2]: https://github.com/forwardemail/forwardemail.net/blob/ef67fe...

[3]: https://github.com/forwardemail/forwardemail.net/blob/ef67fe...
Docker keeps reminding me of people in the past shipping VM images, or sometimes physical machines, often with rather inappropriate desktop hardware and software. So do these points:

> The problem is the use of Docker as a lowest common denominator, or perhaps more accurately lowest common effort, approach to distributing software to end users.

Shipping physical machines probably is even lower than that though. Or even the VMs.

> One of the great sins of Docker is having normalized running software as root.

I am not as familiar with Docker practices, but unfortunately, AFAICT, people did that frequently on regular systems as well, just to not bother with permissions. (Edit: now I recalled people also not following the FHS and storing things in the root directory inside Docker images, but sometimes it was/is similar without containers as well, and inside a container it does not clutter the host system, at least).

> Having "pi" in the name of a software product is a big red flag in my mind, it immediately makes me think "they will not have documented how to run this on a shared device."

This approach is similar to shipping physical machines. Or at least maintaining odd legacy software on a dedicated machine.

I think a rather pessimistic view is that proper packaging switched to Docker or single-purpose machines, but an optimistic one is that those are the unnecessary VMs and larger single-purpose machines that were replaced by Docker and RPi. Maybe there is a little of both going on.
I felt similarly about the Robert Pattinson Batman. I thought it was a good take on Batman and in my opinion he makes a good Batman, but both me and my partner thought it was going to end about 5 separate times. I also didn’t understand SPOILER the scene with the Batmobile coming to life to save them at the dock. They built it up so hard and menacing, only for it to sorta gently roll out.
I noticed this too, and imo it's a design flaw that people get misled this way. Sequential inputs should yield sequential outputs, otherwise you might think it's meant to be unpredictable like SHA256.
Il OnePlus 11 5G si presenta come un potente smartphone con specifiche all'avanguardia, inclusa la fotocamera Hasselblad di terza generazione, una vasta memoria interna da 128GB e un display AMOLED Super Fluid 2K da 120Hz. Scopri le caratteristiche principali e le offerte disponibili.
Specifiche Chiave del OnePlus 11 5G:

Fotocamera di Alta Qualità: Dotato di una fotocamera principale da 50 MP con OIS, grandangolo da 48 MP e una telecamera per ritratti da 32MP, supportata dall'assistenza hardware per la calibrazione del colore naturale con Hasselblad.

Potenza e Prestazioni: Equipaggiato con Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, fino a 16GB di RAM e grafica abilitata per il ray-tracing. La RAM-Vita comprime le app e ottimizza la memoria per una maggiore stabilità e velocità.

Batteria e Ricarica Veloce: Una batteria da 5000 mAh con SUPERVOOC a 100 W, permettendo una ricarica completa dal 1 al 100% in soli 25 minuti. Caratteristiche come Battery Health Engine e Charge De-aging mantengono le prestazioni ottimali della batteria.

Display Innovativo: Lo schermo AMOLED Super Fluid da 6,7" con tecnologia LTPO avanzata offre una risoluzione 2K e una frequenza di aggiornamento dinamica da 1Hz a 120Hz. Dolby Vision HDR e colore a 10 bit assicurano una qualità delle immagini ultra vivida.

OxygenOS 13: Il sistema operativo OxygenOS 13 garantisce un'esperienza veloce, fluida e senza interruzioni. Il design Aquamorphic offre un'interfaccia visiva semplificata con maggiore stabilità e affidabilità.

Ulteriori Informazioni sul OnePlus 11 5G:

Compatibilità 5G: Si consiglia di verificare la compatibilità con il proprio operatore, poiché la disponibilità del 5G può variare.
Neuralink will fix it. Get on the waiting list.
I really like the railroad diagram style, it can easily be understood and then converted into code. Thats something BNF and kin just don't let you do.
But a machine can also be mathematically described. Should that render it unpatentable, or will that have to wait until the grand unified theory of everything is sorted out?
FWIW that's exactly what I've done
This system seemingly would defeat your solution as well
Well, if we consider Neuralink, that is just another interface. I still don't understand how the UX problem could be solved.
> Portable POSIX shell scripting is hell on earth but bash scripting with shellsheck can be surprisingly pleasant.

Assuming you meant `shellcheck`: you know it works for POSIX compatible shell too right?

What's wrong with bash is that people invariably end up requiring features that aren't available in some deployed version, and then you've lost a lot of the benefit of writing in shell in the first place.

Similar to shellcheck, shunit2 works just fine for running unit tests in posix compatible shell.
Books are still written, and there are quite a few online courses, and some of them aren't bad. I've learned that to be productive in a new language or framework I really need to dive into some of those resources. The manuals you find online are rarely good enough to learn from, and all the tutorials and "getting started" just scratches enough on the surface to make me frustrated.
Local LLM use isn't really continuous though. You're comparing Apples to oranges.

For training especially and for the datacenter, NVIDIA cards still make absolute sense. But for consumer use cases, and even for developers, it's not so cut and dry. Very comparable performance for short-term bursts of compute.
Interestingly, it seems there might have been independent invention of the same idea[0]. Have you checked for any patents in the space?

[0] https://bytes.grubhub.com/why-we-use-crypto-when-generating-...
Universities do not need any more career retirees. That Is how higher education has become mostly noise.
do functional languages mainly appeal to computer language enthusiasts/researchers? im just not seeing the benefit personally.
You can partially mitigate it by making sure DMARC, DKIM, and SPF are configured right. There are tools online you can use to verify they're setup right, don't remember which sites though.
Yes, the Nazis.
why do people have to always try to convince me how unfazed they are by nudity? if you're unfazed by it, please link me to your nudes. if not, you're fazed.

there's absolutely nothing wrong with finding certain states of undress offensive. would you vote for or against buttholes on display on bus kiosks? i'm against.

on the other hand, making an arbitrary line, and seeing if an AI can detect/enforce it is an interesting CS challenge. that's how this game is played, and that's what would impress this audience.
Yes, they are. Enjoy and be astounded by the scale of it.
Because they weren't in charge during the problem? Because by the time Clinton got elected we had been through 12 years of Voodoo Economics?

By the time Clinton got elected, the damage was done. The pension funds had been looted. The companies had declared bankruptcy and were gone. Families were divorced and torn apart due to men working 200 miles away for 10+ years. etc.

And I DO have beef about Clinton--NAFTA in particular. But nothing that Clinton or Obama did is even remotely on the level of the devastation during Reagan/Bush.
The Russians were pulling out of the Continental System (embargoing the UK). If Napoleon let Tsar Alexander do this without consequences, it would break apart the order Napoleon had sought to create in continental Europe. Most nations in Europe at the time hated this system because it hurt their economies, and made them effectively subservient to France. You can imagine how one nation breaking away from this system unpunished could trigger a cascade of rebellions.

Napoleon actually successfully invaded Russia, and he took the seasons into account. What he didn’t count on was the Russians deliberately going scorched earth on their own territory and even setting fire to their own capital.

For several days Napoleon sought to parlay with Tsar Alexander after capturing Moscow, hoping to reach a settlement. The Russians wisely kept him and his army waiting until they were forced to begin retreating due to a lack of supplies.
Another potential issue when remapping keys involved rollover and ghosting effects for individual keyboard models.

Some clusters of keys were simply better than others when it came to being able to press bunches of them at once--and have the program actually notice--and the modifier keys (control, shift, alt) were especially privileged.
I'd like to see an experimental language that leans hard into the concept of controlled mutation.

I always say that purely in terms of design my ideal language is high-level Haskell, low-level C. Conceptually, purely functional design is how programming "should" (note the quotes) be, but doing so down to the level of functions is both not very practical (some algorithms are just easier to express in terms pointers moving around rather than folds, reduces and the like), and makes it hard to reason about performance (especially memory, and most especially if you throw laziness in the mix).

But then again, I write my own stuff in python because I'm a lazy fuck, so probably it's not meant to be :(
This looks interesting with lots of feature packed. Looks like a promising language.

One thing not clear is what's the reference vs value model, lifetime, and mutable vs immutable model.