skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe the fee = the ETF holds bitcoin securely for you instead of you having to deal with wallets.
Have you tried approaching it with the idea that you don’t have to form a stable routine? The next time you’re sitting around with >20 minutes to kill, go for a run instead of doing social media/HN/Netflix/whatever it is you might do to kill time. If you found you woke up an hour early and can’t get back to sleep, go for a run. Maybe it’ll eventually lead to a routine, but maybe it won’t and that’s fine, too, you’re not trying to win a marathon. Running once is better than never, so no need to put pressure on yourself to form a stable routine.
I didn't realize this situation was going to get even worse / muddier for this long when I first heard the headlines last Friday- but I guess that's to be expected with political intrigue at the top of one of the most impactful (or at least viewed as such) tech firms in the last couple years.

Anybody have any insight at all as to how this ends?
Let's hope so, otherwise it looks like someone is... sunglasses Murder for FIRE
Nah.

If a company is using leetcode, I won't further consider being employed by that company. Same if I'm given any sort of weird psychological questions.

Not because companies are wrong in doing those things, but because they are a strong indicator of how the company operates in general, and that I would be a poor fit there.

Fortunately, most companies do neither of those things.
On Embark and Lude
This in particular seems like a task an LLM might do a decent job at.

A prompt like

> You are esteemed computer scientist Donald Knuth's secretary. Your task is to determine which email is prioritized for immediate delivery, and which email is to be gathered and read at a later date. Label them "IMMEDIATE" or "LATER"
I was excited about Claude 2 for a few days but quickly determined that it’s much, much worse than GPT4 and haven’t used it much since. There really isn’t much point in using a worse LLM. And the bigger context window is irrelevant if the answers are bad despite that. I’ll give this new one a try but I doubt it will be better than the newly revamped GPT4.
Yes, how does the ETF hold and secure the coins is what I'm asking.
So, 6 out of 7 then.
they take off at around 7-8 knots, so as long as you can get up to that you're good. the motors and wing stay well below the water, the candelas do wave detection as well IIRC.
This is inhumane.
"...but my motives were pure!" — "You stole it out of greed." — "Pure greed!"
Even for text flows, the margins should be derived from properties of the container.

Traditional graphic designers creating print layouts didn’t use randomly different margins for elements on a page. The margins were derived from a grid system that was applied to the entire page. Within that system, the margin between a body paragraph and a header might be (for example) two grid squares, while the margin between body paragraphs would be one grid square.

CSS designers should have thought more conceptually about the HTML page as a container for text elements. Instead they just created a whole bunch of properties that allow elements themselves to define any spacing anywhere in any units, then tried to patch up the conceptual mess with hacks like margin collapse.
Because he's salty about it, the comment doesn't point at anything else
Some Workers Want to Get Fired. Here's Why
General Steve Jobs. Fearsome fellow.
No, he was not a generation older. But he managed to still create a persona that was bigger than life.
This is a very cool project! Kudos to the authors for being on top and keeping the features coming. Appears to be feature-competitive with OpenAI's GPT-4V `vision` endpoint.
It seems that many news media companies have these 4 in 2023!

- Pressure to maintain numbers
- Fear and silence
- Conflicts of interest overlooked or unaddressed
- Goodness in some areas atones for evil in others
I don't know enough about what happened inside of those to evaluate.
As a backend dev primarily, learning CSS Grid really helped me filter out a lot of the BS.

It's a UI framework that is 20 years too late, and with "lean" JS frameworks that are emerging, a lot of this UI development legacy can die a horrible death as far as I am concerned.
This. Most companies running on AWS/GCP/Azure are paying nowhere near the advertised costs.

B2B deals are not like consumer ones. Often times companies will "trade" their own business' service in place of cash.
GPT4 equivalent:

https://chat.openai.com/share/87b7fa63-ff22-48ae-8a2f-c9f71f...

No problems, of course.
Read the article, it's addressed with charts.
GP said 4!, which I assume is 4 factorial, or 24. It looks like the 24th game in the series was Final Fantasy Origins:

https://thefinalfantasy.net/games/
But that's the thing - AGI in theory will be able to constantly change the trading strategy. It will not figure out some trading strategy it will figure out all the strategies and how to apply it and what will be the consequences with how big of a probability. The only other thing capable of outsmart it will be another AGI and nothing else will come even remotely close.
It is more of free pizza will arrive while you wait in line and watch ads. But now you want to jump ahead and snatch free pizza before your turn comes. In normal neighborhoods people look down upon such behavior. But nowadays such behavior seems sign of cool dudes.
I guess I fundamentally don't think charity is the right way to solve social injustice. If you went around giving out blankets to antebellum American slaves, I guess you're helping the specific person you're handing the blanket to, but are you helping with the actual problem? After all, the problem facing the slave is not that they don't have enough things, but rather, that they don't have enough rights. Until you have the rights, no amount of material palliatives will ever save you. So that's why I didn't really go for EA when I first heard of it.

Now, we have Sam Bankman-Fried's version, which is at least intellectually rigorous: if you can make billions (through scams) then give those billions (eventually) to charity, are you not morally obligated to do so? At which point I am somewhere between laughing and crying.
America's hidden security crisis [pdf]
I find this mostly unconvincing (except for the part where all the tools messed this up and made the problem more difficult).

It's not clear to me how you get top-level await with CJS with significant drawbacks OR breaking changes that would just end up back up in ESM land.
That's false... there are mandatory tests the doctors do and they do inform the parents if there is a detected problem.

What tests are you talking about that should be done BEFORE conception!?

Supporting a test that says you have X gene and that might result in a problem so you can't reproduce is a ridiculous stance to have.

You seem to have no knowledge about current medical screenings and no regard for human liberty.
The difference is that the science will have tightly defined terms for "cognitive development" and "well being" that is different than what a parent is measuring when they're looking at agitation, misbehavior, impulsiveness... etc.

My wife and I have seen the same thing with our child. More agitation, more self-satisfying behavior ("forgetting" to do as told and playing instead), more temper tantrums. Kiddo still gets screen time, but it's limited.

There's a much bigger correlation with bad behavior, mental "fuzziness," and impulsiveness to diet, than to screen time. Too much processed food, food with preservatives, and food with refined wheat flour... yikes. Night and day difference in some cases. (Turns out a lot of kids have a "wheat allergy" but it isn't just that.)
AI model instantly generates 3D image from 2D sample
but is now down by 75+% since last November peak (and still declining). I suspect that we won't see another price spike like last year's for quite some time.
The key quote in the article is "The actual contract Microsoft has with OpenAI is not publicly available", so we have to go by these imprecise quotes uttered by the CEO during podcasts, such as "We have all the rights and all the capability. I mean, look, right, if tomorrow, if OpenAI disappeared, I don't want any customer of ours to be worried about it, quite honestly, because we have all of the rights to continue the innovation, not just to serve the products".

So, uh, does anyone have any ideas on what the situation actually is? If OpenAI ceased to exist, can Microsoft take the code, model weights, everything of ChatGPT 4, and just continue developing it and produce a new MS-ChatGPT based on it? That seems to be too good to be true. Why would OpenAI give away all of it's IP to Microsoft for that cheap, with the only limitation being MS can only make a 100X return + 20% a year, and MS does not own any IP which OpenAI deems to be at the level of AGI. A deal like that is surely worth more than 10B.
I swear I'm stating to experience increasing levels of the Mandela effect (might not be the proper explanation) over the last few years, because this is the first time I've ever heard of genes being a thing which could change. Granted, I'm not a biologist, but we have sayings like "good genes" or "it's in the genes", and I've heard countless medical explanations that things are passed down "in the genes". Aren't genes directly linked to one's dna, and not a thing that any physical trauma or stress can physically modify? Why does this seem like it directly clashes with my life long understanding of "genes"? I'm possibly going insane, because odd things like this keep popping up and are a bit troubling in some odd dejavu kind of way
I built a game you might find interesting. It's basically a visual Lisp wrapped up in the idea of arranging magical cards to build spells.

https://www.bittwiddlegames.com/lambda-spellcrafting-academy...

The demo is playable in the browser too thanks to Rust + WASM.
Incentives are a hell of a drug.

This is the Homo sapiens version of the Alignment Problem.
While I wouldn't personally use them, that appears to be the point of all three of the services he listed.
Is the regulations that are forcing co-pays, networks, obscured pricing? From the outside it sounds like the market doing it's best to extract as much money as possible, with the occasional regulation designed to look like someone is trying to fix the mess with a pretty bandaid (like the recent one on detailed upfront pricing).
I think money is the root of all evil.

I think money ruins things that it touches, and the things that are made in pursuit of money, especially in today's computerized world, will be predatory and exploitative.

The Internet used to be for hobbyists, making content out of passion in addition to having actual jobs (sort of like free software).

But then they made content creation their jobs. Then the platforms got "professionalized". Now, content creators have to be professional eggshell dancers while the consumers are trapped in mind prisons where advertisers have the keys. We're now cattle in some corporate money printing machine, of which the creators are hapless contractors.

That's never what I signed up for. I didn't ask the creators to do this for money. I never opted into the game their playing (I also didn't read the EULA ;D). I also wouldn't pay money for Asmongold's 500th "IS THIS THE NEXT POGGERS MMO?" video (but I will watch it for free for like 15 seconds, then question my life choices and close it before watching some better video for free). So I don't care. As far as I'm concerned, they should go back to being hobbyists, get real jobs for their livelihood, and the Internet should be demonetized.
Fuzzy Feelings – Apple Holiday Film [video]
Looks great!

I am working on some similar concepts but for music programming:

https://glicol.org

I feel that it would be great if there could be some examples on the landing page directly.

When I try a lesson, I get stuck; The hint is on the right but it's not very obvious; perhaps you can rearrange it like Svelte Tutorial (https://learn.svelte.dev/tutorial/welcome-to-svelte)

for the syntax I am not sure; have you considered using LOGO?
You could have static cyclones with palette shifting to get a good effect.
Becuase there is competetion now so Apple has to play well. In cases where Apple doesn't have any competetion or is significantly ahead like iMessage or FaceTime or satellite message, Apple has a history of creating ecosystem.
They are pushing their SaaS pretty hard, these days.
> it's not they have trouble learning programming. They have trouble learning anything

sheesh
I agree 100%. In America the capitalist dream of competition and technological innovation actually driving costs lower for the consumer has mostly just died in almost every category. Any savings are now passed onto a cabal of private equity firms and legislatively-entrenched insurance corporations.

Goodhart's Law is in full force, and the measure of business health, profit, has become the target, rather than consumer welfare and rights. Boy have we optimized for profit at the expense of anything else.
N.B. the last commit/release for Swashbuckle was Jan this year.

https://github.com/RicoSuter/NSwag might be a better choice for a new project. It look much more maintained and active than Swashbuckle
My biggest feedback is in the UI information displayed.

Before I try, before I 'log in', I have no way on the landing page - or navigating around a bit - to find out how much it costs. That knowledge up front would make me as a buyer feel much more trust. To hide that behind UI sign-ups always strikes me as underhanded (forcing someone to invest attention as a sales tactic feels too manipulative to me to consider the service helpful and not a money grab).

Easy fix, just display how much it costs upfront.
There seems to be quite a bit of evidence of the opposite, or at least that "high-status" people are equally or more ethical. Some of the misperception seems to be explained by society holding high-status individuals to a higher ethical standard and more attention when they deviate from the norm.
What about cofounder Yi He? If she's still in place then CZ stepping down doesn't mean much. I mean they have two kids together, don't tell me he won't be involved from the sidelines.
They're banks, so the assumption is lack of ethics.
I believe Satya because if he's lying, this is securities fraud.
Fuzzing Duperemove
> it comes at a cost of duplicating your data model and the interfaces between them

Not the case if you use graphql.
On the one hand, the article and the talk it is about stresses the severity of the moral transgression: "moral meltdowns", "really crossed very bright lines", "ethical collapse".

But on the other hand, the implications of the moral failure for the moral status of the company and its employees is pushed far away into the corner:

- "These are great companies, great organizations, good people"

- "misguided companies"

- "good people at great companies"

The list that follows is something you can retroactively apply to numerous instances of corporate wrongdoing, but also provides an enormous amount of false positives and a false negatives.

Thousands of businesses don't meet these criteria and yet are morally compromised (e.g. Cargill). Thousands of businesses do meet these criteria and yet aren't going to be called out as "ethically collapsed" by the author before they've been outed and widely accepted as failed.
I think allows them to mostly pick up where they left off and protects them from whatever (if any) outside influences had a hand in creating the events of last week.

On top of that they have people at Microsoft in their professional network.

And lastly and perhaps most importantly, Microsoft is not a Silicon Valley company [1] and navigates the world by different winds.

[1]: Neither is Amazon.
Many thanks to Mark Overmars for the development of GM, it was a core part of my toolkit in the early 2000's and introduced me to offline programming.
From Anthropic's docs: https://docs.anthropic.com/claude/docs/configuring-gpt-promp...

In OpenAI's case their "\n\nAssistant:" equivalent is added server side with no option to prefill the response.
Corporate regulation looks a lot like an LLM refusing prompts.
Conflicts of interest sure if they were clear and proven. The rest sounds like there’s not much to work with.

The only actual action is firing an at will employee. The various supposed consequences are sort of second order effects that could easily be ascribed to the action of others and most of them haven’t actually happened as of now.

There’s a LOT of people in the world that have absolutely no interest in a court precedent that a board can’t just fire a CEO if they want to. This is basically a textbook application of the business judgement rule, and it’s even more clear cut since it’s a non profit and the board gets to decide how they want to interpret the mission.
The two processes are not entirely analogous. They are both the result of the body reacting to external stress, and to become more fit for the environment that creates the stress. In the weightlifting example this is a positive change — the body gets stronger, as long as the exercise program is good.

In the TBI and trauma cases, though, the external stresses are negative, not positive, thus the adaptations are negative as well. Teach a young brain that the world is stressful and scary and the brain will remember this, and act that way even when removed to a less scary world.
I wonder if they could bore some geothermal loops to move the heat someplace else to dissipate more easily.
PHP has a really bad reputation in the tech world, unfortunately.

I had that wrong idea too until very recently. I realized PHP has progressed a lot better in the last 10 years than JS has because they have the luxury of being able to control the runtime. Unlike the JS world that has to use TS as a crutch because browsers are evolving so slowly.
It's also in the garage and driveway and street with bidirectional EV charging paired with good incentives for smoothing the duck curve.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_curve#Mitigation_strategi...
Yes but on chrome. Might be a workplace policy because never under personal accounts
I'm curious to see how BTC will fare. We've only seen the 4 year halving cycle play out during a secular bull market so far.
I doubt these small taxis are designed for the North Sea though.
The fight with Culex re-uses the boss music from FF4, though. (Even if he never appears there.)
Trim – Cancel unwanted subscriptions and negotiate lower bills
Who cares who started this? All four are equally responsible. You can’t vote then say it wasn’t your fault (unless you were literally coerced).
If you had read the article you'd understand that it's talking about changes in gene expression, not changing of genes entirely.
I took the question as being about "moral trustworthiness" rather than about having any specific moral code. In my view, "moral trustworthiness" is having a moral code that you adhere to, regardless of what that code actually is. It's the opposite of "moral opportunist", or someone whose moral code changes according to what happens to be the most advantageous at the time.

But I could be overthinking this.
Something I never understood about ChatML: were those "
" things reserved sequences of text that mapped to specific integer tokens, but were not things you could include in your own text that you submitted to their API (or if you did try they would be tokenized differently)?
I saw a single person standup foil on a local lake. They look unreal, almost unbelievable in operation. Like someone is flying over the lake. Search for efoils on youtube
What do you suggest is the mechanism of action behind that? I submit ApoB. Same reason why high blood pressure leads to ASCVD.

Note that risk factor is not causal. I.e. not exercising is a risk factor.

Notably it seems like you can't drive LDL too low https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/ldl-cholesterol-how-low-...
Video game company layoffs are creating an industry crisis
And what have we got other than hft from all the billions poured in so far?

Further, I suspect any ai capable of outperforming the market would be too rational, to the point that you wouldn't be able to market it.

If the ai decided that bitcoin wasn't the future, and in 20 years time was proved right, how many people would have maintained that patience?
Care to name any?
> I mean it started from such a noble cause to answer all of humanity's questions to literally tricking end-users into clicking ads...

I'm pretty sure you've just described the web.
This kind of deal is just unfair to any other business: if they are a marketplace, they have to have the same rules for everyone. It shouldn't matter how big you are, how you went to college with their CEO, or if your wife drinks tee with their wife: as soon as you provide a service that anyone can get, rules should be the same for everyone.
Part of the problem with this sort of analysis is that hindsight is always 20/20.

You may think your company has is transparent and has a wonderful process for handling conflicts of interest. Then only when things collapse do people come out of the woodwork and start dishing drama.

If they have a fear and suppression program that works, you would never hear about it!
My read was that they weren't worried about it being too commercial necessarily, but that it would be closely held with only governments and huge companies getting access.
Have you tried it? GPT4 fails as often as it succeeds at coding questions I ask so I'm not going to shell out that kind of money to take my chances.
We need a huge "NOT CURRENTLY (CHECK AGAIN IN 5 MINUTES)."
Yeah, we actually took that approach for the block-based experiment for Khan Academy. I think we ran into issues with auto generating the blocks for JS prototype based classes, if I recall correctly, but I can't remember exactly what the issues were. I don't know what approach OP is using.
> The new CEO of OpenAI said he’d rather Nazi’s take over the world forever than risk AI alignment failure

That's pretty much in line with Sam's public statements on AI risk (Sam, taking those statements as honest which may not be warranted, apparently also thinks the benefits of aligned AI are good enough to drive ahead anyway, and that wide commercial access with the limited guardrails OpenAI has provided users and even moreso Microsoft is somehow beneficial to that goal or at least low enough risk of producing the bad outcome, to be warranted, but that doesn't change that he is publicly on record as a strong believer in misaligned AI risks.)
I imagine HN in particular is also quite dominated by traditional US finance.
> Once you get them in a state where they can't lie

How can this be done, and how can you tell when they're in that "state"?
How would you track this? Productivity itself seems subjective (is it just any output, completing hard tasks, creative flow, deep thinking…?) Depending on how I define it, I will have a different response.
This is pretty cool, The UI is a little tough-- deleting code blocks is clunky.
its also hard to break out of the type modals
there should also be some kind on context aware help dialogue to tell you what operator/type you have active is/does
In London, with few exceptions, the cellular connectivity is better than whatever horrendous WiFi your hotel/restaurant/train/etc. has. The only time WiFi is sometimes better is in cool underground bars and such where there’s no cellular signal whatsoever.

Hell it’s better than most people’s home internet. My home internet is 1.1Gb/s at the wall, but once you factor in the WiFi in a dense urban environment with a brick wall house, I’m lucky if I get 150Mb/s. Meanwhile 5G from my bedroom easily clears 500Mb/s.
Show HN: Learn Systems Design by Doing
If you want an even better example look at Steve Jobs.
You just described your own system of ethics. I think you're confusing the concept of ethics with a particular construction of ethics
Blue Zones on Earth