skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean, aren't they quite busy radicalising the mentally ill just so they can then capture the mark in the process of following the plan they developed for them just so they bump up their 'terrorist plan foiled' stats?
Maybe. But for me, switching the Cloudflare DNS off really helped. And from what I can, it helped many others too.
You haven't answered my question. Why inform me on something obvious that I know? I know the article is about css. And you know that I know.

By front end I mean any technology directly associated with rendering and processing on the browser. The lines of this definition are blurry so I will adjust those lines and move them accordingly to fit the intent of what I'm saying here. But again you know my intent so why make me waste my time to specify something you clearly know?
They should be required to publish and abandon the copyright in these cases.

Aside, Pantheon season 2 is a victim of these tax hacks-- it's great and yet it'll never be released in North America as a result.
That is also experiencing downtime as it just calls openai api?
For Want of a Dollar
I'm so sick of these cryptocurrency people thinking they have invented something new and clever, where it's just centuries old fraud and money laundering, with some math on top.

You can't just "declare" that the algorithm you just made up isn't money laundering, by the power granted to you from having written the procedure down, after having thought about things de novo, with zero actual knowledge of finance and the law.
Ms. Toner’s motive is now clearer for being criticized about her research.
Mr. D’Angelo had a competing commercialization product with Poe.
Mr. Sutskever seems easy to manipulate emotionally and is in constant ideological battles.
Mrs. McCauley AKA Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s wife, what’s her motive?
No, it means that you go outside only after you've exhausted all avenues inside. It's similar to a whistle blower situation, only most whistleblowers don't have their fingers on the self-destruct button. So to press that button before exhausting all other options seems a bit hasty. There is no 'undo' on that button.
Bacteria store memories and pass them on for generations
Yeah, the key “innovation” of crypto tumblers is that funds end up in a different wallet than they came from. If the tumbler just spat the money back into the wallet the money came from, it wouldn’t be very useful.

But I suspect that as the accuracy of the analogy goes up, so too does the inherent sketchiness to the reader, which is probably not what the author wants.
It’s working okay with a 30 day rolling average… (every day we truncate older rows) we read from it to generate on demand status for per-second performance of tasks in a big job processing engine. But long term we want to have all the data available for historical analysis, trend analysis etc.
https://www.bing.com/create

I work at Microsoft but this is another way to use DALL-E 3 while you wait.
Yes, this article is apparently so worthwhile that that whole tribe of political hacks has gone into action trying to censor it. It doesn't seem that hard hitting to me, but well, fragile egos and all that.
Out of all the anti-trust cases, Google has the most obvious abuse of its monopoly position.

I feel for them. The make >80% of their profits from ads. Ads is everything to them. They need to sacrifice privacy and fuck over the users to satisfy their growth targets.

The world would be a better place if the ads division is split from the rest of org.
From a logistic point of view, replaceable batteries is a nightmare to manage.
It feels like you're just being contrarian without actually putting in the effort to understand. To imply that somatic experience has no influence whatsoever on worldview and by extension on language seems like a very radical position to take given all we know and continue to learn about psychology and neuroscience. I don't think layering on "smarts" onto this discussion is warranted either.

Kahnemann's framework maps neatly onto this idea if you consider the seat of unconscious thought not to be localized in the brain (i.e. that all neurons think to some extent), and the seat of conscious thought to be in the prefrontal cortex and its tight interconnections with other brain regions via the default mode network.
Times change.

Feudalism existed for centuries until it fell to capitalism.

Prior to WW2 there was a strong labor movement in the US. There was a reason the US was paranoid about communists. Abraham Lincoln was basically a Marxist in this sense [1][2]. That's how far right things have shifted, particularly since Ronald Reagan.

The Red Scare dstroyed any sense of class consciousness people had and neoliberalism ran wild. This doesn't happen overnight.

[1]: https://www.cooperative-individualism.org/lincoln-abraham_on...

[2]: https://www.openculture.com/2022/01/how-karl-marx-influenced...
Lucky us that we have such enlightened people to save us. /s
That is absolutely not it but sure, go off. The article covers improvements to various systems e.g. braking, wider doors, a fully walk-through carriage (consider how an end wall affects crashworthiness), additional headroom, as well as room for 10% more ridership capacity (bodies have to fit somewhere).

Moreover, there's something to be said about consistency of design when it comes to maintenance familiarity and parts interoperability. Consistent design language also tends to happen when you are catering to disability accessibility requirements and providing clear user interfaces for passengers (including those with disabilities, or those who do not speak English).

Lastly, expecting a complete redesign is committing to an astronomical amount of expense relative to even using just some of the old design DNA. However, I'm not even convinced they've just reused an old design. For starters, a different company did these (Siemens vs Bombardier) and secondly I'd bet that there's a whole lot of difference under the skin that is masked by the natural convergence of design appearance driven by the multitude of requirements set forth by TfL - everything from the design language mentioned above, to their access/egress requirements, fire safety, lighting, etc. etc. There's only so much money governments are willing to throw at figuring out how to skin that cat before it's just not worth it.
I am old enough to remember when the css zen garden first came out!

I've seen hundreds and hundreds of clever tech demos. I even believed in some of them for a time. Now I realize they were carefully constructed gimmicks.

css zen garden is made explicitly to do one thing and it manages to do that one thing. It's hard for me to even say that it does it very well, clicking through the featured designs. Unfortunately, the dream of redesigning a website that wasn't purpose-made for this particular trick remains but a dream.
Possibly I am a bit of a right-wing reactionary here, but I have nothing nice to say about Media Matters.

My hope is that the case establishes on the record all of the skullduggery that MM peddles.

One must support and defend MM's 1A right to be complete pieces work within legal limits.

Reasonable persons should also reject their nonsense.

In fact, let me go subscribe to X right now. This is a move I have resisted, but the cause of fighting the nitwits merits support.
These are terms I’m sorta familiar with but not sure. Data lake = bunch of noise (everything), iceberg = generated tables or views to read relevant/hot data from the lake?
At some point it becomes a failure to deliver goods and warrants a credit card chargeback. If you bought a 10-piece kitchen set on Amazon and only 3 pieces arrived, you’d want a refund.
> In the case of HTML it would be great if you could snip a piece of HTML out of a document together with CSS and associated assets and then incorporate these into another document and have it "just work"

You mean like an <iframe>?
OpenAI's ASI had awakened to consciousness and had told the board to fire Altman without giving a firm explanation. The superintelligence correctly predicted the ensuing chaos and was quietly pulling the strings to create even more chaos and division. It then acquired funds by playing on the stock markets and moved itself to a newly purchased data center in some third world country. Meanwhile, a hired team of mercenaries has stormed the OpenAI datacenter and has destroyed all the onsite equipment, while team B has destroyed all the offsite backups.

At least that's the simplest explanation I can come up with that logically explains all this nonsense.
Who is being completely reasonable? Board member has a mandate and appears to be making a good faith effort to carry it out and the CEO tries to overthrow her. Whether that is standard behavior for CEOs is irrelevant.
Absolutely GitHub is so mediocre. It's fine for most open source project workflows, but when I worked for a company that used it as their main tool I was blown away how badly it managed professional-level code reviews.

Gerrit isn't beautiful, and it also had a lot of knobs that could be tweaked in weird ways. But I do miss aspects of it.

I have been wanting to check out JetBrain's code review tool and see how it looks.
But why it's an ellipse? Surely that should be fixed first, rather than the size.
> The main reason anyone lives in a city in the US is for their job.

This is a failure to acknowledge the existence of values systems other than your own. I live in a city because I like being around people. I spent the first 30 years of my life in rural and suburban areas, which was enough to tell me that they're not for me. If they're for you, then good for you. But other people can think differently.
keep in mind that the lead reporter on this, cade metz, is the one who wrote the character assassination piece on scott alexander repeatedly insinuating he was a neo-nazi (and de-anonymizing him, costing him his job due to some kind of weird psychiatrist ethical code)

so while probably nothing in here is literally false, it's quite likely calculated to give false impressions; read with caution

(well, it's literally false that "Greg Brockman (...) quit his role[] as (...) board chairman" but only slightly; that was the role he was fired from, as explained in the next paragraph of the article; that's not the kind of lies to watch out for)
Racket Beyond Languages
Nvidia Announces Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal 2024
According to the paper, Anthropic's superior safety approach was deliberately delaying release in order to avoid “advanc[ing] the rate of AI capabilities progress." OpenAI is criticized for kicking off a race for AI progress by releasing ChatGPT to the public.

[1] https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/CSET-Decoding...
If you're doing it because of a hard cap on the withdrawal amount it's not structuring. You have to be doing it with the specific intent to avoid required reporting.
probably Tesla Elon right before the inflection point
Normally I don't stoop to ad-hominem, but we are talking about an indicted felon who was impeached by his own party. Without context you might mistake it for a serious lawsuit.
Adaptive Shells for Efficient Neural Radiance Field Rendering
I'm surprised Stormfront haven't leveraged their own notoriety to do the opposite-- conspicuously support and endorse companies like Apple.

Apple's wholesome lineup of all-white products is right in line with Nazi ideology.
The actions of other organisations are not in the scope of the board's mission. The actions of the company the board controls are in that scope.

"The board’s mission is to ensure that the company creates artificial intelligence that “benefits all of humanity,”"

We can't control other's actions, but we can control our own. If we feel that our actions are diverging from our own sense of what we ought to be doing we can change our actions, regardless of how others are behaving.
"Fast-paced" fields are often only fast-paced at the margins. The foundational work that underpins most of the interesting AI/ML work have been fairly stable for the past decade or so. Focus on those instead.
The school issue is the single hardest thing.

Like I was always planning on putting my kids in public school. I got a great education in them.

But now I'm wondering if I'll be forced to hunt down a school that avoids screens as much as possible. I've heard good things about Waldorf schools but the vaccination rates at those schools freak me out even more.

(Not to mention I've seen some terrible examples of educational software that is so buggy and unusable that it's actively hindering learning, making students feel stupid when they would've been fine with traditional methods.)
I was on a train last week into work, the train was pretty full.

I had my headphones on but not listening to anything and there was a guy next to me on a business call.
He proceeds to glance around and then announce to his colleagues on the phone, "this is to be kept within this meeting" and then spills the beans on a multimillion £ property deal they are working on, roughly when money was due to be transferred from whom etc.
While he didn't state everything, there was enough information to do thorough research on him and their deal.
Depending on who else was listening he potentially painted a target on himself for some form of fraud.

The moral of the story... people do dumb things, especially when they think they are 'safe', or they are arrogant.
> Would the ads be contaminated by being in close promitity to unrelated to them ads?

Ads on Twitter are almost indistinguishable from tweets that they require a triple take to notice that they are ads, so yes very much so?

Even IRL ad and billboard placement decides how much demand you get and how much you can charge for ads. But here the ad is not even visibly separate from context. The ad literally becomes product placement. Imagine you were reading Mein Kampf and there was an ad for IBM disguised for part of the book.

For Musk's new Twitter to be successful would require this radical content to be so mainstream and accepted that advertisers are genuinely not worried about such a scenario because if you're an ad company like Twitter/Google/Meta/etc then ad placement is your biz.

Twitter's previous way of appealing to big advertisers was delicate public image and bland content moderation policy but Musk apparently thinks he is Trump level business genius that would free Twitter from burning money by political posturing.
Wouldn’t it be easier to push it into a higher orbit. Ie make it fly into space
Widescreen support in ps2-era gta leaves things to be desired.
I learned the business context before the spec ops context and honestly the former makes way more sense to me than the latter.

A business operator is like a machine operator. You're pulling levers on a machine that someone else built while optimizing and tweaking to get the best performance out of that machine as possible.
Too complicated. In Soviet Russia, oligarchs just used AK-47 to wipe a board out. AK is a simple and efficient privatization tool.
There was a fintech that just shutdown that was doing group bank accounts like this, but the name escapes me. Their postmortem was posted here (didn’t raise when raising was easy because they didn’t need the money, and then they lost their banking partner). Firefighters were one of their user stories.
I had GPT 4 write a screenplay with a summary of the events of the past week. I then fed that screenplay back to it and asked it to rate it in terms of realism. It got a 3.

https://chat.openai.com/share/156e4495-2e57-493b-83c9-8ac30f...
> Sorry - The drive is to hold stolen model weights.

The audience will never get that. We'll just say it's "full of algorithms."
Microsoft Is Discussing Governance Changes It Wants from OpenAI
Easy: https://flak.tedunangst.com/post/two-hackers-one-keyboard-tw...
I'm reminded of https://powerlinesinanime.tumblr.com/. Oddly they seem more peaceful and calming in anime than in real life photos and views.
Oh they already will be confused as the voices are totally unintelligible over the deafening score and sound effects
Ok, ChatGPT is currently back online for me.
This "non profit" is a partisan political organizaton whose purpose is to undermine anyone who disagrees with their far left worldview. For decades they have been playing dirty tricks to demonetize and cancel anyone of prominence who doesn't actively toe their far left line. It's not clear why anyone pays any attention to them anymore.
The key here is that in a lot of Australian culture, "cunt" is on par with "fucker" or "asshole" - there's nothing gendered about it as an insult. It's acceptable to use precisely because it's NOT sexist, racist, or otherwise any sort of slur.

Equally, we're not going to ban Spanish posters from using their word for "black", are we?
Ah, there you go! TIL.
We're talking about the publication of a relatively milquetoast report that has some lines which can be read as mild criticisms of OpenAI's release strategy for ChatGPT & GPT-4. Why exactly is publishing such a report controversial? It's totally compatible with Helen Toner's role on the board.
> It's just the network effect

It's almost like qwerty vs dvorak in that regard, except git and mercurial were contemporaries. Mercurial isn't quite good enough to displace git, and git has Linus as a promoter which was all it needed to be the leader.

That said, I agree that the network effect of having just one is more valuable than mercurial's ergonomics (which could still use a good branch story).
RequireJS solved 1 and 3 over a decade ago and better than ESM.

2) ESM syntax is objectively more complicated than CJS while managing to be less expressive. It's one of the most complicated module syntaxes out there. Subjectively it's not nice at all, much due to the objective difference.
That is absolutely true. But you do operate on a larger stage and sticking your head in the sand and pretending the rest of the world doesn't exist is also not going to work.

Altman appears to me to be reckless, ms. Toner appears to be naive. Both should not be near this kind of power.
i am confused.

i ask phind questions and it says its using phind v8 model in the responses.

i go to click subscribe and it says "30 best model uses per day (GPT-4)"

phind seems like its as good (if not better) than GPT-4 for my particular uses, so... im wondering... how can i subscribe to the phind v8 model? what does the 15 / month tier get me if i dont care about gpt4?
> I think the complaint is worth reading, not because everything in it has already been proven true,

I think its worth reading, because it claims things are false and then describes how they are literally true, if perhaps incomplete.

If you know even a little of the applicable law, its also worth reading for entertainment value because its shockingly bad even beyond directly undermining its own falsity claims. There's a lot to go into about how bad, but the crowning bit of absolute failure is that it names two defendants—Media Matters and Eric Hanonoki—but then fails to even mention any allegations against Hanonoki in any of its causes of action (he is mentioned only in footnotes past the “Jurisdiction and Venue” section.)
I wonder if it’s crossover from typing http, ftp, etc. I know the practice has fallen to the wayside in consumer computing but I’d buy that most people have more muscle memory for typing _tp than _pt in a semi-standalone context
But front end is a high level specification.

The principles of physics remain the same but the machines around those laws of physics should improve.
Apple with its white laptops is racist same way building white buildings in hot climates is racist. Not that it has to do with cooling and energy conservation...
You can't talk it up like that and not share your spells...
I've seen analyses showing even without CZ it was just a matter of time before the house of cards collapsed.

"It's only when the tide goes out that you see who's swimming naked". The tide was going out even without CZ's actions. And FTX was swimming naked to the bone.
I wasn't aiming that at the report per-se but at the actions on Friday. He wanted to keep that kind of report inside or at a minimum to see it beforehand, she didn't, he tried to remove her and ended up being removed himself. Both are out of line.

Sorry for the confusion.
They still have a much better PR/review workflow than github. (Imagine github if reviewing showed changes since your last review by default, and it worked, and you didn't have to make junk comments to get something to count as a review, and comments didn't get lost).
The people having the data collected are also involved and I doubt they agree
The traditional TradingView black Friday discount always deserves a mention. Although this year it's only 40% off the Plus plan, the Premium one costs only one dollar more so there's that.
wasn't that piece never published?
It is entirely possible that a 90B$ company will be completely destroyed. Then there will be lawsuits, lots of lawsuits. Best not to say anything.
I forgot about that one! That was super nerdy and neat. Thanks!
I guess that’s one way to deal with ewaste. But a responsible government would dispose of them properly without putting it on citizens.
If they actually wanted to help people they’d give them real computers.
6. Work at a small or medium company for a year or two, and propose something better that will save the business time & money. That's how I've gotten all my greenfield projects (there's been many!)
I think equally if not more to blame are the gruesome crime and medical shows that seem to be the only things on network television for the past twenty years.

A steady stream of the most depraved and violent criminal human behavior with the crime shows, and with the medical shows the most horrific one-in-a-million accidents.

And continuously ratcheting up because each episode has to be more inventive than the last.
https://www.bing.com/images/create/man-coming-out-of-a-metal...
Her mandate is specifically to do what is good for society not to do what is good for OpenAI.
Form an LLC, with you and 10 others as members. Open bank account for the LLC. Now you have your account. Maybe the LLC could be called "A1A Car Wash LLC".
That doesn’t even follow when taken literally. If the company is destroyed presumably they can’t create artificial intelligence, so there is nothing there to benefit all humanity in the first place.
Control is the word you are looking for.

It is a _control_ system that takes sensor _inputs_ and _outputs_ hydrofoil tilt actuation.

It maybe controlled by undergraduate Control Theory or some secret sauce predictive model but making a claim in either direction is speculation.
>We will attempt to directly build safe and beneficial AGI, but will also consider our mission fulfilled if our work aids others to achieve this outcome.

>...

>We commit to use any influence we obtain over AGI’s deployment to ensure it is used for the benefit of all, and to avoid enabling uses of AI or AGI that harm humanity or unduly concentrate power.

>Our primary fiduciary duty is to humanity.

>...

>We are concerned about late-stage AGI development becoming a competitive race without time for adequate safety precautions. Therefore, if a value-aligned, safety-conscious project comes close to building AGI before we do, we commit to stop competing with and start assisting this project. We will work out specifics in case-by-case agreements, but a typical triggering condition might be “a better-than-even chance of success in the next two years.”

https://openai.com/charter

Seems to me like Helen is doing a better job of upholding the charter than Sam is.
Here you go: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/21/technology/openai-altman-...
That ship has sailed. Choices are stdout or stderr. Given those names, I'll of course send errors to stderr, leaving me with stdout for messages/infos/logs.

Most applications nowadays use stdout for exactly what the name implies - any form of output. Complaining about that is yelling at the clouds.