skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've been trying to upgrade a couple of libraries we use internally at work to output CJS + ESM, from a typescript project, and have the output be 1-to-1 files (so, no bundling / rollup / whatever you want to call it).

What a frustrating experience it has been.

Using unbuild "works", but

- For the life of me, I can't get unbuild to generate `.d.mts` files when my source files don't have `.mts` extensions. Luckily, when the library is used in a downstream project and a `.mjs` file is imported, TypeScript properly loads the `.d.ts` file anyways

- When it comes to a downstream project, TypeScript doesn't seem to work with export maps. People say it does, but maybe because I don't have `.d.mts` files TypeScript is saying it can't find type information? It _does_ work with simple export maps, but if I say `'./': './dist/esm/'` so the downstream project doesn't have to manually import from `dist/esm` I see the issue

- Using the "esm" module / moduleResolutions + converting my files to `.mts` + changing imports in the source to import the non-existant `.mjs` files results in a CJS bundle that tries to require a `.mjs` file, which unbuild has built with a `.js` extension, so it throws an error because it can't find the file.

- For some reason unbuild mucks with the hashbang line in my _CJS_ `bin` script, the ESM one it doesn't touch

Ugh.
You don't need an account unless you're commenting. I get feeds for the channels I watch via RSS and use mpv with yt-dlp to play them.
Yes, it is reasonable, and, in the absence of more systematized knowledge gathering, is all there is. OTOH, it also creates a mass of conflicting, mostly wrong, and difficuly to improve within the same franework, beliefs about the world, because the experience of each person is limited, and often highly nonrepresentative in non-obvious ways.

Which is the problem addressed by the development of the scientific method.
Reminds me of the famous Deng Xiaoping quote: “Seek truth from what your young cousin says about other children.”
Does this factor in the impact of constant instant-gratification of whatever is done on that screen?

Because (subjectively) I can see how children with lots of screen-time have a harder time with activities which do not lead to immediate dopamine release, like reading, listening to a story, drawing, etc., while children with low/no screen-time can derive satisfaction already from the process of doing something.

--

Edit: I'd say none of this impacts "brain function or well-being" directly, as both CAN do tasks without instant gratification, it's just that children with lots of screen-time perceive them vastly different from my personal observation.
A bit like how every fourth Instagram post is an advert, and that's excluding 'sponsored' content.
This got me thinking - the salinity of the water in the bothnian bay is very low (seems to be about 1/10th of ocean water). Wouldn't that effect electrolysis?
Same. I was so active in the legacy forums before YoYo games deleted it all. I found an archive of the old forums on archive.org and I'm extracting the folder as I write this (process has been taking over an hour so far and it's only halfway). So far it seems to be almost 60GB of information. I thought it would just be text, but I guess it's that plus all the images. I can't wait to see what 10 year old me was up to back then. It's been 20 years.
100 years ago people were making similar arguments about kids reading books, and then somewhere between then and now the culture shifted and we decided we actually want kids reading more, not less.

I agree with parent poster, we've got to be very careful about correlation and causation here. The screen kids I know, yes they definitely do seem to have poorer mental health, but there also tends to be a lot more questionable stuff than just the kid's own screen time happening in their homes. Notably, their parents are often so completely keyed into their own priorities (which may or may not be Wordle) that the kids don't really have anything else to do, anyway. So another decent hypothesis is that the kids just aren't getting as much good social interaction, period, and that's what's really affecting their social-emotional development. If that's true, then that might imply that the screen is more of a coping mechanism on the kid's part (and therefore might even be beneficial given the context) than a primary cause of the problem.
Yeah, screen time != screen time.

I noticed a very different result, when I consciously watched some selected videos together with my boy vs. setting him loose with a smartphone in his hand.
> How profitable would Spotify be if they were paying full price?

They're not profitable now so very not.
Looks like double to triple of what the same level at MSFT fetches https://www.levels.fyi/?compare=Microsoft,OpenAI&track=Softw...
Yes because AGI would invalidate the entirety of das Kapital.
When science doesn't match your personal observations, that doesn't make the science wrong. It also doesn't make your personal observations wrong - it usually (in my experience) means that you're measuring/observing different things (assuming you're reasonably intelligent, which I am doing). In this case, "cognitive development and well being" are complex concepts that probably do not map exactly (or maybe even grossly) between their definitions in the study and their experiential meanings in your head.

My personal observation is that "screen time" is not the problem, but lack of interaction _is_ - letting the kids be in front of a screen for two hours doesn't cause a problem, but letting that be an excuse not to spend time with them or interact with them (which is when it usually ends up happening in large quantities) does. Essentially - you need to control the other variables to understand what's really going on; excessive screen time is generally a symptom and not a cause.
Cognitive development falls under the umbrella of psychology, a failed science.

It's impossible to reliably and exhaustively measure development, and like real science, disproving an effect is orders of magnitude more difficult than finding an effect.
GP did make a blanket statement
Find something that you enjoy. I hate running but I love boxing.
It seems the Big Data hype never really died down - it just changed the name
You think this secret deal is "no surprise" just because Spotify uses GCP? That seems a little conspiracy-theory-ish to me.

This to me is still quite shocking, especially since those are completely separate departments and such behavior would so clearly scream anti-trust
We lost the fight for net neutrality. It took a while but more and more stories are coming out about companies punishing users who dont do xyz and that is perfectly legal for them to do. I'm sure eventually there will be lawsuits, or the current ones will resolve one way or another, about this.

By the way, altstore exists on iOS. Although it is very limited.
Let's say it does: It leaves behind a WebAPI backend that [new hotness] can utilize. WebAPI is an agnostic protocol.

What does Blazor leave behind? Nothing reusable at all. It is a proprietary server hosting proprietary connections via proprietary pipeline. Plus sometimes inscrutable WebAssembly. Just go ask all the companies STILL stuck on Web Forms or Silverlight how that worked out for them the last times? Exactly.

Friends don't let friends buy into proprietary backends that muddy the water between UI/API layers. Stick to WebAPI and put whatever you want in front. That way you can migrate either front OR back independently of one another (and or do piecemeal migrations).

PS - This has nothing to do with "Microsoft bad." This has to do with standard protocols between front/back Vs bespoke stuff. I'd also criticize the short-sightedness if another company offered the same thing.
> Are you, as we speak, conducting a double blind, properly controlled and sampled study of juvenile cognitive development and device exposure

The study you are defending is not blinded, controlled, or randomly sampled. Use your brain for a second instead of reacting instinctively. Do you really think this oneoff paper was the result of a 10-year longitudinal study?

In fact, the hypothetical study you are describing would cost millions of dollars, never pass an IRB or be consented by parents.

Please try to update your priors.
I didn't read their comment as "drains the battery", more like "slows your computer down and eventually freezes". That could still be fine if you anticipate it (and as you said, it's a prototype) and the control system (throttle, rudder) doesn't depend on it.
evaluation of Chinese companies will be more stringent than local companies against the rules of monopolies.
I hate to break it to you but Victoria line modernisation, including cooler trains, has already happened in 2009. Here's an example IanVisits article about that:

https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/today-marks-the-final-t...
The designer doesn't work semantically. Working with tailwind is like digging the hole for a pool with a spoon instead of a bulldozer.

They repeat the same tailwind classes 20,000 times and if the application gets bigger they repeat it 40,000 times and if they have to change the way it looks it is the mother of all cut and paste jobs.

There is an unholy convergence of the tools being almost but not quite adequate, the platform being driven by companies that have overly favorable unit economics (Google could care less if it cost $2M to make a simple web site) and a designer mindset that is all too comfortable with trading a bulldozer for a spoon.

Tailwind would be a lot more appealing to me if it was coupled with some system where I could say "class X inherits from tailwind classes A, B and C" and thus have a layer of abstraction over just writing properties.
I had the same issue for around a week in Chrome, but it stopped being like that on Sunday. I never looked into it, I accepted it as a punishment.
1. "Did you mandate COVID-19 vaccines for employees?"

2. "Would you allow an employee who has acquired a concealed-carry license to arm herself on company property?"

3. "Do you donate to the Democrat party? How much? And what have you done to funnel company wealth to it?"

Rationale:

1. Coercing people to receive a medical treatment that they may not desire is a clear sign that the CEO lacks a moral compass - this is Nuremberg trials material. The groupthink in 2021 was: "the vaccines are effective and safe." Any skeptical CEO who resisted that groupthink, and respected an individual's right to remain in the control group for that medical experiment, demonstrated moral trustworthiness.

2. Respect for an individual's right to self defense is a clear sign of a moral compass. Individuals who have acquired CCLs must submit to background checks, complete a training course, and know the law on the use of lethal force in defending oneself - they as justified as police officers in carrying firearms. A CEO who has come to this understanding, and NOT established a policy contrary to it demonstrates moral trustworthiness.

3. The Democrat party has established itself as the party of moral erosion, for whom a consistent, universal morality does not exist. It is the party of moral relativism. And moral relativism is defined by it un-trustworthiness on morals. Soros and SBF are/were the two biggest donors to this party; they are walking examples of moral un-trustworthiness. We can probably nitpick, and ask a similar question about the Republican party, but those people are all about morality...right? That's a big reason why libs pick on them.
I mean in that case Hydrogen fuel cells are clearly the future, just as soon as we manage to make our gravity well irrelevant.
Characterizing app store fees as purely for payment processing is so disingenuous it's hard to even engage.

The reality is these fees are for access to an audience. Google spends a lot of money developing Android and creating a storefront that huge numbers of people see every day.

Casting that as "payment processing fees" is like complaining it's outrageous for a farmer's market to charge $200/day for a 10x10 booth because 100sf of parking lot can be had for $10/day somewhere else: you have to willfully misunderstand the business for the argument to make any sense.
I can cite plenty of anecdotal evidence of what seems to be addiction. Major temper tantrums and hyperventilating when screens are taken away. Not to mention, zoning out for an hour or two watching unboxing videos or whatever on YouTube.
I was you once. Once I achieved a high level of fitness and a motivation to push the limits, then I understood what people mean when they say exercise can make you high.
> Last I heard Apple was at 100% compliance

Do you have a source for this? At other tech companies I'm aware of, the numbers are still much lower than 100%, even after threats of performance impact.
The only alternative to Redsys, which is owned by Spain's main banks, is managed by Cecabank but it's not very relevant, like a 90%-10% market split here.
This made me laugh for some reason
But it's significantly slower for me on Firefox even though I have YouTube Premium.
Microsoft could be in great difficulty and Satya managed it well.
Not right away, but it's clearly trending that direction and hopefully the US pushes for it as well.
> Thus we get a lot of things like bootstrap and tailwind that erode the idea of CSS classes being somewhat semantic

If everyone is using CSS wrong, then I think that's pretty good evidence that the design is flawed. The semantic/cascade model has proven to be challenging for designers (as you suggest in your comment), difficult to maintain (inheriting a mess of somebody else's CSS is a nightmare), and counter to the component-based encapsulation that seems to be the trend in modern web dev patterns.
>less refusals

This is not quoted in the article
Fiiine, I Googled it.

.. I'll watch the film later.
I imagine one of the challenges would be getting up to foiling speed in rough waters. From the videos I've seen, once the hull of a foil boat is out of the water, the ride is much less affected by waves.
Half a standard deviation means going from the 50th percentile of IQ to the 69th. I'm assuming you didn't mean statistical significance since size of movement has nothing to do with statistical significance, so you must have meant significant in the sense of important.

(Just saw your rebuttal about "significance" below. Statistical significance is not how big a movement is, it is the chance that such a movement could be due to random chance. A very small movement could be statistically significant if your sample is big enough to show it's probably (e.g. 95% probably) not due to chance.)
Yeah, this is the answer.

If you want to see if you can do X, you do X and see what happens.
This is the real problem with the Apple/Google 30% tax: it's not that the App/Play Store costs 30% to run. It's that they want to give sweetheart deals like this to very large customers.

You're paying for that slush fund.
Kid plays minecraft or runescape? Cool

Kid watches people opening boxes for shock factor. No.

Its time to stop pretending these are the same. The old guard cannot concede that Video Games might be different from TV Screen Time.
I mean, if you have a file `mod.ts`, in Deno you cannot import `mod.ts` using the following import:

import {} from "./mod.js"

You have to write:

import {} from "./mod.ts"

ESbuild doesn't transform source imports. Thus, by transpiling your code using ESbuild, you get an erroneous import that leads to a runtime error in browsers and Node. The case is worse for TypeScript, because it refuses to tarnspile this code.

By the way, bundling with ESbuild is possible, however when you write a library you generally want to transpile the code, not to bundle it.
The standard deviation referred to in the article is the effect size, and not the standard error of that estimate, which is what would be used to determine its significance.
Please keep making it shitier to the point I consume less and less of YouTube.

These tactics are nothing new for non-Chrome users. Most of the "Oh they just didn't have Firefox in mind, no malice on Google's part" it's just bullshit at least in part.

This is just one more instance of it, and it's getting pettier and pettier..
I would love to know the waist size of the average HN user.
Sideloading isn't a solution to this. The average user isn't going to figure out how to do that on their own (and if you disagree, then you're living in a bubble surrounded by tech nerds). There's a reason Google Play is the dominant store on Android even though sideloading has been possible since the first Android devices came out, and it has been a piece of crap through all of that time.
Should you ban employee use of AI?
Sodium is better than lithium in that respect. But both are MUCH better than hydrocarbons.

The amount you need for driving a car for 3 years is several kg vs tonnes. And you can recycle the battery but you can't recycle the oil you burned.

That's why I'm not particularly harsh on lithium externalities. Let's get the low-hanging fruits first before we focus on nuances.
This is a work of fiction about writing fiction, and it is full of "purple prose". Not recommended.
Awesome. Any GPT-4-turbo / gpt-4-1106-preview comparisons?
I loved SMRPG and I have tried to play Earthbound probably 50+ times in my 39 years of existence and I have never, ever found it fun or interesting. I don't think I've ever gotten past that opening where the village/city/whatever is under attack by aliens and you're running around trying to find people or something.
Put some method of contact in your profile so that people can reach out to you.

I think what you are seeking is more likely found from more than one person. I'm sure that there are paid services for parts of this, but it sounds like building some relationships might be a fruitful endeavor.
In that Atlantic article last night it said that ChatGPT was turned around in a matter of weeks to match a competitors offering. I don’t think Anthropic would’ve had the lead time to deliberately time this. I think it’s either serendipitous that they planned to launch this week, or at most they were going to delay this release until after Thanksgiving and decided to put out the press release today instead.
I hadn't noticed, I am running the Raspi's on LCDs from the thriftstore.

Remarkable product-market-fit.
Who needs Java when we have C#?
You're right. It's a 5% hit, not a 2% hit.

Trucks spend a lot of time loading, unloading and on mandatory driver rest breaks. Charging can and will be done during those times.

The biggest expense in a trucking operation is diesel. Trucking has cut-throat margins. Once electrification starts in the industry, everyone will switch quickly, or go bankrupt. Some routes will be hard to electrify, but the cost savings on the rest will be worth a lot more than a little bit of inconvenience.

It's not easy, but the savings will incentivize overcoming the obstacles.
would be a perfect application for sonar, wouldn't it?
This is simply a matter of momentum. If enough of the signatories follow through more will cross the bridge until there are too few people left to keep it going and then there will be an avalanche. It all depends on the size of the initial wave and the kind of follow on. If that stops at 200 people leaving it will probably stay like that, if that number is 300 or even 400 out of the 700 then OpenAI will be dead because the remainder will move as well.
This may be the major distinction that is missing. We don't talk about what someone is doing on the screen. Some activities are better than others. Me play Path of Exile -- not great. Reading HN -- potentially not a time sink. Watching a documentary on deadly snakes -- mild time waster. Reading Terry Pratchett for 20x time -- endless joy.

edit: I guess my real point is that it is all in the eye of the beholder. I know my parents hated me playing games.
Children and everyone else … I can’t watch a movie anymore without either reading something or playing chess at the same time just to up the frequency of those hits.
How does this compare to gpt4? I’m happy to switch to the better tool irrespective of manufactured drama
Well, screen time I imagine would also not induce diabetes or clogged arteries in children 9-12. but it will few decades down the line if they don't ingrain good habits because of that screen time.

Same with this, if MRI does not detect brain "hardware" damage, that does not mean there are no software damage done to kids with excessive screen time at young age.

I had a son 2 months ago. One of my biggest concerns is how to protect him from excessive screen time and social networks until he grows up enough (~14 years at least). I plan to do a lot of nature going (with some backyard astronomy and biology if that piques his interest) and sports, active travel.. We'll see how it goes
It's at least the denominator and likely both. I personally know a non-zero number of people formerly there who found a different job or retired when Apple insisted on everyone returning to the office.
Not when the company told the existing engineers they can’t afford raises and have to lower bonuses. Then they openly offer much larger payouts to all the new folks.

Might or might not be worth it, but there’s no way that doesn’t create massive resentment.
"Now that Netflix knows that Spotify pay 4%, why would they ever agree to anything more? "

I would suspect, they have a special deal as well.
I would be concerned that the carbon fibre has been significantly weakened by the impact.

https://www.resinlibrary.com/knowledge/article/can-carbon-fi...

> Since fibre strength significantly exceeds that of the matrix (epoxy), damage usually occurs in the matrix before the fibres for laminate composites. In some instances, this is relatively easy to detect; snapped fibres protruding from the object’s surface. Yet more microscopic damage – something which can spread through the object – is harder to detect even though it can significantly reduce the mechanical properties of the composite.
Is The Information actually a higher quality source? I can't say I know much about them. Why do you think that?
Ursa Major to Offer 3D Printed Solid Rocket Motors for Munitions
AI could predict heart attack risk up to 10 years in the future
A bit out of date, but not to the point of being useless. I still give them to juniors and interns that want to learn more about kernel work. There's also a much more recent (2022) book called Linux Device Driver Development published by packt. In general, these sorts of books are mainly useful for "what not to do", as general architecture stuff is usually well documented by source code examples and in-kernel docs.
> What are you talking about? Statistical significance is directly calculated from effect size and standard deviation.

But it's not about how big the effect is. It's how likely that the effect was or was not due to chance. A very small effect can be statistically significant. You missed "sample size" in your list above - a big sample size can help you show a small effect is probably not chance.
It doesn't appear to be linked to in the article, but I believe these are the docs for Claude 2.1:

https://docs.anthropic.com/claude/docs/claude-2p1-guide
Or his other famous quote "I do not care if it is a white iPad or Black iPad, it is good as long as it scrolls on Tiktok." Very wise man, that Deng.
Spotify's size and consequences of not being on the Play Store are exactly why Google would do this.

Google gives no shits if random app developer isn't on Play. And so holds firm on their cut.

Play without Spotify makes a lot of users ask "Why isn't Spotify on Play?" And probably follow-up with "How do I get Spotify? Download another app store? Okay, I'll do that."

So essentially, the money that Google ceded to Spotify was approximately what they thought discouraging users from installing alternate app stores was worth.