skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think Larry Summers probably knows what a central bank is.

But "how money creation works" isn't the same thing as "how the financial system works". I guess the financial system mostly works over ACH.

We can see what happens when banks don't lend out deposits, because that's basically what caused SVB to fail. So by the contrapositive, they aren't really operating then.
I am not at my best in the morning, so I do my work at night instead (as much as is feasible anyway).
The book How not to Network a Nation is good on this history
Only goes to show how the original board played itself
What about between OAK and SFO terminals inside security, so that connecting flights (or East Bay passengers boarding and returning) could transfer to & from international gates at SFO?
I don't think I am.

They don't think they're defending money laundering because they don't realize that what they just "invented" is money laundering.

The analogy doesn't make sense, since the difference between the mixer and the jar is not the place that the "money" is mixed, but more like the difference between sex and rape. It doesn't matter in which room the act took place.

It's missing the point, just like saying you thought you were relying on free speech when you signed a contract and then didn't hold up your part of the deal.
To add insult to injury in java 8 you can't output gc log info anywhere else than to stdout...
Who needs a book to understand the crazy overwhelming scale at which AI can dictate even online news/truth/discourse/misinformation/propaganda. And that's just barely the beginning.
Ilya and Adam switched because they lost, and their goal wasn't to nuke OpenAI, simply to remove Sam. Helen and Tasha had the votes to prevent Sam Altman from returning as CEO, but not the votes to prevent the employees from fleeing to Microsoft, which Helen and Tasha see as the worst possible outcome.
I've been developing understanding from using it for coding. I guess a lot of us are developing this understanding. It is very trustable about high level things many people know. As the knowledge is more specific or esoteric the less trustworthy it is.

If my mom asks it questions about my work industry, they are vague and high level enough that chatgpt is very accurate in it's answers.

If I ask it probing questions I care about my industry it hallucinates or fails to grasp key terminology.

So, if I was OP, likely asking it broad questions about things I know very little about is quite safe. Going too far down a rabbit hole to something super specific I would want to verify on Wikipedia.
that concept is part of the premise of Parasite Eve, a great novel, turned into a shitty movie, turned into an alright game.
Yup, same here! Used GameMaker extensively before getting into Minecraft modding and Ludum Dare game jams with different engines (LWJGL and XNA/MonoGame). 16+ years later and I'm a Senior Gameplay Programmer
I think what this saga has shown is that no one controls OpenAI definitively. Is Microsoft did this wouldn’t have happened in the first place don’t you think?

And if Sam controlled it it also wouldn’t have.
Interesting test of whether we suddenly see a decline in the number of VC pitches claiming to have or be powered using AI.

While the dumb money flows to anything with an A and an I in the pitch deck, I expect they will continue.
Absolutely agree with you on all points, and I think Arch is often falsely thought of as unstable. Its rolling, but of course the software is vetted and stable.

I have had other distros break in more ways and more destructively than arch, for sure
The alternative is Japan style corporate warfare where divisions in the same company try to bankrupt the others
> every few months, an update bricks my install

I'm really curious about why this is. I have a desktop I update daily, a laptop I update very irregularly (once even went without an update for over a year), and a toy server that I update once a year or so (I know, terrible security practice). All running arch. And I think I've had two situations where something broke significantly after an update, and even those didn't require a live boot USB.

What desktop environment/window manager/compositor do you use? I'd guess one of those is the culprit if anything
That is really interesting, thanks for the insight!
>Nationalism, irredentist attitudes, ethnic cleansing and military conflict seem to be very much back on the menu as of late

Hardly surprising when the last 3+ years saw the biggest wealth transfer and biggest erosion of the middle class in history. And the average people who suffered that decline aren't comforted by the typical "ackchyually, the economy's great, look how well the stock market is doing" when they have too much month left at the end of their paychecks and no chance of getting out of the serfdom cycle.
Is there a similar difference between an LLM getting things wrong and someone shamelessly making something up out of the whole cloth? That's closer to what actually happens.
Thanks, the 970 Evo Plus is a solid unit. I have one in my old PC, along with a 980 Pro. Went 990 Pros on my new, they didn't go 30 minutes before I had the firmware updated. :-) Very good performers.

(I always keep an eye on things like firmware updates).
My Journey to Achieving 5M Users with a Solo-Developed Website
I would probably use stronger words than that, data persistence is a big deal, so the missing part of the spec is a fundamental flaw. What's a disk whose persitence is random? You can probably legally assail the substance of the product.
The title is a typo. "Phosphorous" is an adjective. The correct noun is "phosphorus." The linked article uses it correctly, so only OP screwed up here.
A generally recommended elimination diet is the FODMAP diet (originally out of studies by the Australian Monash University).

It's primarily for IBS and identification of trigger foods, but the elimination and reintroduction steps may well help you with identifying your triggers.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FODMAP

https://www.monashfodmap.com/

They've also got a basic, but handy app.

It's done me well over the years.
People love talking about politics and history in the balkans, and its because the balkans have been politically and militarily torn apart hundreds of times in the past 200 years. History and politics are a big topic of discussion. I think its much better to have this than the random americans on youtube who dont know who their president is or why they invaded iraq or any basic fact about their country. Its like they live in this tiny bubble of just going to work and back and not belonging to any community out there besides a costco membership.
I am struggling with this just now. I am however writing a library where it makes sense to allow import of subpaths. How would this change then?
This definitely add per-packet latency and processing, that's why the recommended way to run VPP with high performance is to use some kind of network accelerator library, the same way the VPP based solutions like TNSR by Netgate will work best with DPDK for kernel bypass, or use similar technique like XDP with eBPF but XDP does not bypass the kernel hence eBPF is needed.

For Linux user space solutions without kernel bypass if the above mentioned network accelerators are not installed (devices in customer's premise, etc), the recommended way is to use Netmap since it enabled direct access to the network interface card (NIC) buffers from user space otherwise you are at the mercy of Linux own notorious sk_buff [1].

Another alternative perhaps for more efficient buffering in Linux is to use PF_ring or the the-kid-on-block IO_ring but not sure they are being currently being utilized in VPP or not.

For good introduction on Linux Networking acceleration technology, this presentation is a good start [2].

[1] VPP docs: Create netmap:

https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.04/clicmd_src_vnet_devices_netmap....

[2] Linux Networking: The meaning of acronyms eBPF, DPDK, XDP, VPP [video]:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38376380
The AI training corpus is literally based on approx 50% female data. So how are females not relevant to its governance exactly?
He upset the democratic establishment when he chose to stalk Clinton’s daughter on YouTube
> Furthermore, the overwhelming groupthink shows there’s clearly little critical thinking amongst OpenAI’s employees either.

Very harsh words for some of the highest paid smartest people on the planet. The employees built GPT-4 the most advanced AI on the planet, what did you build? Do you still claim they’re more deficient in critical thinking compared to you.
> Airline prices are much cheaper than they used to be.

The base price listed, but by the time you add all the fees and fees on fees, not so sure they're any cheaper. Last time I flew a few months ago the initial flight price of ~$600 on kayak search became ~$1500 by the time I had the final price 5 minutes of clicking later. I ended up buying the ~$800 flight that became ~$1300 after all the add-on fees.

The real problem is that it makes comparison shopping incredibly difficult, since each airlines packages their dozen fees differently. Years ago I could list all the prices from A to B and pick the best time and price from a single screen and that's that, since every price was the final price. It was so easy.

Now I have to go through each flight option individually going through the whole reservation sequence to finally get a price. It can take many hours, what used to be a simple search. If you've done this I'm sure you know the add-on fees are different for each flight option! I'm sure most people just give up and buy whichever rather than waste the time, which is exactly what the airlines want. I'm obsessive enough that I'll spend the time, but what a waste.

> Imo airfare is the crowning achievement of capitalism

Capitalism works optimally when consumers can be fully informed and comparison shop with high efficiency. The airline pricing these days is pretty much the exact opposite of that, being extremely opaque by design to prevent comparison shopping.
i don't think that's really any brand loyalty for OpenAI. people will use whatever is cheapest and best. in the longer run people will use whatever has the best access and integration.

what's keeping people with OpenAI for now is that chatGPT is free and GPT3.5 and GPT4 are the best. over time I expect the gap in performance to get smaller and the cost to run these to get cheaper.

if google gives me something close to as good as OpenAI's offering for the same price and it pull data from my gmail or my calendar or my google drive then i'll switch to that.
The risk/scenario of singularity is that there will be just one winner and they will be able to prevent everyone else from building their own agi
Why is Altman, who has no higher education, critical for development of AI?
Oh definitely. I did (and am still refining) a full elimination diet to get good clean data. I cut salicylates, amines (e.g histAMINE), and glutamates. Fedup.com.au is a clunky decades old resource, but the content is no-bs and so valuable.

I have rhinitis flare ups too - I’m not sure I’ve pinpointed exactly what flares mine up, but I most suspect guar gum / xanthan gum. Either as a trigger, or just causing thickening of mucus, which spirals into blocked noses and sinus infection issues and further rhinitis.

What really helps me is lymphatic drainage massage. There’s videos on YouTube showing you how to gently directionally massage the drainage channels to keep your sinuses clear.
And Google, Facebook, MSFT, Apple, are much more misaligned.
It's called a jack-knife.
It's also on you since you have a choice re which name to use
Show HN: Deepmark AI- LLM assessment tool for task-specific metrics on your data
That kind of engineering is surely done for "big" projects but I'm pretty sure my contractor didn't do any FEA modeling when he put up my shed. He knows from experience that normal wooden beams and some steel bolts will be fine.

I think part of the problem is that most of our "raw materials" like nginx and postgres are so robust that you can build really quite large projects without having to do any modeling or other big planning. Things that have millions of users can still be more-or-less slapped together from default parts.
There was a sort of a equivalent - GWT. And it was really good and ahead of the time: it covered intermediate API out of the box, provided quite nice way to develop FE in plain Java, it was async, it allowed common BE and FE codebase.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx_LGilOuE4. I think the plan is to replace to it with something based off JJ.
My mechanical mecury thermostat is now AI!
He’s trying very very hard to claim some credit in this. Probably had none.
Node.js 20.x runtime now available in AWS Lambda
> There’s a meme that Git is hard to use but I think it’s conflating the challenges of getting used to version control at all, distributed version control, and any specific tool.

Anecdote follows!

I originally started with cvs, and then later, svn. I struggled when git came along, the workflow felt super cumbersome and I kept tripping over the 3 stage process (working directory, staged for commit, and committed), compared to the 2 stage process for already-tracked files in cvs and svn.

After several years, I still never got used to it, and kept having to google when I’d run into random weird issues, having accidentally gotten my repo into a state that had strayed from the basic happy path. Then I started using hg at work, and life got a whole lot easier.

I still haven’t migrated my personal repos off git into hg, mostly because I haven’t (looked for, or) found an hg equivalent of gitea that I can self host, but from my personal experience, day to day usage of git is way harder than day to day usage of hg.

Then again, it helps that I learned hg on the company dime, instead of on my own time.
Studies have shown that more diverse teams are better overall (don't have time to look it up now, sorry. Should be easy to find).
As a said in another post: Some middle ground because we don't know if that is possible to the extent that it is existential. Parts of the mechanisms are proven, others are not. And actually we do police the risk somewhat like that (controls are strongest where the proven part is strongest and most dangerous with extreme controls around small pox, for example).
The title of the post (on Hackernews, above) has the spelling "Phosphorous" (with a U). This is the spelling of the Adjective (a describing word). It is a mistake in this context, because what has been discovered in the outskirts of the Milky Way is not a grammatical construct but rather a chemical element.

The chemical element is spelled without the U (even in British English!): Phosphorus.

https://grammarist.com/spelling/phosphorous-phosphorus/
Is higher education really crucial for pushing something forward? Even if he isn't an AI expert, there is lots of stuff surrounding the technology that needs doing, for example massive amounts of funding, which he seems to have been pretty good at securing.
A friend of mine came up with a good analogy: the AI doomers that went off to start Anthropic AI are like the extremist Puritans that were driven out of an increasingly secular Europe.

The thing is that two groups superficially share common traits, but if they do so for different reasons, they aren't actually compatible. You see this with groups of friends that are all "conspiracy theorists", for example. They're all vaguely the same and band together, but get into enormous arguments.

The "AI Puritans" and the "Secular Humanists" are both concerned about AI safety, but for different reasons. The former group would rather that the AIs behave in a prim and proper manner, banning it from doing anything that isn't mandatory. The latter group is concerned for people's jobs, unfairness, bias, and inappropriate over usage of early, low-quality models.

They both say they want "AI safety", but they understand that term to mean different things and arrived at their position from fundamentally different axioms.

One group wants the AI to never say "naughty" things and is happy to dumb down the models to the point of being a lobotomised and retarded... but behaved.

The other group thinks that newer, smarter, better models are critical to ensure that the AI doesn't make mistakes, doesn't get confused, and can obey orders correctly.

One group wants to shove the genie back into the bottle, the other group wants a genie that can grant our wishes.
That's the curse of specialisation. You can be really smart in one area and completely unaware in others. This industry is full of people with deep technical knowledge but little in the way of social skills.
I think it's more or less the same thing, the recall is the way to legally prove you didn't intend to disseminate the flawed product, wheras leaving it on the market after learning of the problem shows intent to keep it there. I would be surprised if a discovery at those companies would not surface an email form engineers discussing this problem.
Doing secure data science within air-gapped environments
In this article, I shared how to overcome data science challenges within air-gapped environments, from accessing the latest tools to safely utilizing internet-available data.
Disappointing? What has OpenAI done to you? We don't even know what happened.

Everything has been pure speculation. I would curb my judgement if I were you, until we actually know what happened.
Same as "The Marked heart" / "Palpito" / "Herzschlag" on Netflix.

(For those about to watch it: the soul-vibing Neighbours-esque intro song is all part of the charm of this show. The shittier the intro, the more dramatic the needless melodrama is in contrast)
I think there’s an additional group to consider- society at large.

To an extent the promise of the non- profit was that they would be safe, expert custodians of AI development driven not primarily by the profit motive, but also by safety and societal considerations. Has this larger group been ‘betrayed’? Perhaps
Are liberal arts universities really losing their liberal arts though? The emphasis and core material of a liberal arts education has shifted a bit. But considering how ubiquitous Critical Theory and its components have managed to become in everything from academia to public discourse to institutional policy-setting I don't think it's accurate at all to refer to the liberal arts as in decline. Maybe classical liberal arts but modernized liberal arts are at the heart of most politics right now.
If the oom-killer is called, you'll see something on dmesg.
http://www.failsafediet.com/the-rpah-elimination-diet-failsa...

This site is a pretty tight digested summary of the same elimination diet that fedup.com.au recommends
> London is a very low density city - it very quickly becomes 2-3 storey terraced houses, even in central areas.

To me this was actually quite surprising. I remember my first time visiting London. Apart from the very center with a bunch of towers, the impression I had was "this isn't a city, it feels like a small town".
fr fr, low-key this is true.
thank you,I did know this!
Just FYI this is a different person that replied to you. And no, it's not a straw man. And it's not incorrect. GDP is extremely vulnerable to broken window economics. The entire US healthcare system for example. It should really be subtracted from the GDP, not added to it.
Hey Everybody ,

We are excited to open source an amazing tool that we've been using internally for some time and which helped us a lot in most of our AI projects - Deepmark AI! Deepmark AI is a benchmarking tool for GenAI builders that enables assessment of several large language models (LLM) on various extrinsic (task-specific) metrics (e.g. accuracy, relevance, failure rate, latency, etc) on your own data, so your AI applications have predictable and reliable performance.

Based on IngestAI Labs' 40'000 users and dozens of AI projects we completed, we clearly see that GenAI builders and organizations need to be able to assess large languag models (LLM) on their own data to deliver predictable and reliable results that balance accuracy, precision, recall (the model’s ability to correctly identify positive cases within a given dataset), as LLM models can produce different answers to the same prompts, impeding the user’s ability to assess the accuracy of outputs.

To address this challenge of reliability, we (IngestAI Labs) have developed and open sourced Deepmark AI - a benchmarking tool, that enables assessment of several large language models (LLM) on various extrinsic (task-specific) metrics on your own data. It has pre-built integration with leading Generative AI APIs such as GPT-4, Anthropic, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Cohere, AI21, and others.

DeepMark AI is a tool specifically designed for AI builders.This solution focuses on iterative assessment of extrinsic metrics to identify predictable, reliable, and cost-effective Generative AI models based on the unique needs of a particular use case and data. Deepmark AI offers comprehensive assessment of various important performance metrics such as:

Question answering accuracy
Text classification accuracy
PII recognition accuracy
Named entity recognition (NER) accuracy
Summarization quality (Relevance)
Sentiment analysis accuracy
Cost analysis
Failure rate
Accuracy
Latency

Deepmark AI empowers organizations to make informed decisions when navigating through the most important performance metrics of Large Language Models.

So what are you waiting for? SignUp to IngestAI today and take your customer support to the next level!

Follow our roadmap on Github : Star us / watch us / fork us: https://github.com/IngestAI/deepmark

And join our community at :
Discord : https://discord.gg/kMpbueJMtQ
Twitter : https://twitter.com/ingestaiio

Hope you loved it.

Team IngestAI Labs / Deepmark AI
The government wouldn’t give that fine to FTX investors and customers. They keep it for themselves. Making FTX investors and customers whole is FTX’s job, not the govt.
Well, at least I now know the word phosphorous exists.
The available public information is enough to reach this conclusion.
You rarely visited shops then. Countless times I watched a top tier gun timing out in 3 minutes and I’m short on money.

Also, BL guns have lots of hidden parameters which may or may not correspond to (or be enhanced by) your build. Playing by green arrows alone is pretty… casual.
>>Parents, meanwhile, can either work to balance the easy sources with...

It's possible to some extent. Different parents will have different levels of ability and success.

This is relevant (but difficult) advice for individual parents, but it's a minor point if we're discussing society. People (parents and kids) exist in an environment. "Just going out to play," isn't part of the world/environment/culture. The way kids/parents did thing differently in the past was by existing in a different culture.

Easy Vs hard stimulation is one paradigm, but you can't just view everything through this lens. Life is more complex. There are looping and knotting causal relationships and we can't know all of them. It's a complex.

Life is just very screen based. Ours and theirs.

They study via screens, and don't really know how to "do school" analogue. Social life is, largely through screens... and increasingly part of the media spectrum. Work will, eventually, be screened-based. So are life's administrative tasks.
Note how what you said also apply to the search & recommendation engines that are in widespread use today.
Have they? It seems there's only one Google employee working on it.
I'm sure most of them are extremely intelligent but the situation showed they are easily persuaded, even if principled. They will have to overcome many first-of-a-kind challenges on their quest to AGI but look at how quickly everyone got pulled into a feel-good kumbaya sing-along.

Think of that what you wish. To me, this does not project confidence in this being the new Bell Labs. I'm not even sure they have it in their DNA to innovate their products much beyond where they currently are.