skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I will say there were a lot of things on each page.

but yeah, maybe "all on one page" or "printable" might have been nice.
It's not "unbundling" they literally just added new costs for features that were originally free because they can get away with it. So far, I have also found you are now REQUIRED to pay for your seats if you want to sit together. Frontier splits me and my wife even when there's seats available
Ahh, I didn't know that, thank you.
SmolPhone: A Smartphone with Energy Limits
> Our required burden of proof can be lower than a court's but it should be higher than "unsubstantiated accusation by mentally ill family member that is uniformly denied by the rest of the family".

Very much agreed with this.
Entirely this. It works so well that I've seen this in various utility libraries for decades.
I agree with all that. I doubt Apple, IBM, etc. saw the Media Matters report and took it at face value, then redirected their advertising budgets without checking into it on their own. In fact, I'd say it's a given that they had marketing people doing their own reload-and-count exercises. And when they did, they came up with a number that was greater than their comfort level.

All platforms will have some awfulness. There's no way around it. If Twitter had a trillion good posts and 1 bad one, no one would bat an eye. It's a rounding error; things happen. But advertisers have at least an informal idea of how much badness is too much, and Twitter crossed. That's the end of the story. Apple and IBM et al ran the numbers and decided that Twitter's content is too tainted for them to want to associate with it.

And because free market, they decided not to any more.
Right, this was sort of the point I made in another comment here.

I know that a solid safety net will result in some freeloading. But when I trade off the negatives of the limited freeloading that I believe will occur against the massive benefits of a population that is healthy, fed, housed, secure ... there's just no contest. If I have to pay a tiny bit extra because a few people are scamming the system, I frankly don't care, and I certainly don't advocate for the destruction of the entire system because of it.
more importantly there are functions (using scheme as an example) like set! and set-cdr! that mutate existing values and totally break referential transparency.

this isn't just user facing - for example let* kind of depends on creating bindings up front so they work across clauses, and then mutating them afterwards
It's not about monads, it's about effectful code, which is represented by special types (e.g. IO in Haskell, Eff in PureScript). Effectful code can call pure code, but not vice-versa. Since a program will have to do something, the main function is always effectful, i.e. it returns an effectful special type. So you're right that pure code isn't evaluated until some effectful code is ultimately returned by the main function and executed (by a runtime or equivalent). However, in purely functional languages most code is pure, even though it's ultimately called by effectful code.

Monads and side-effects aren't intrinsically related. Simplifying, a monad is something with flatMap() - in JavaScript, Array and Promise are monads (kinda). What flatMap() gives you is the ability to chain things, which is useful to sequence side-effects so that they can be performed by a machine in a given order. That's why IO and Eff are monads.
Cant openai just use chatgpt instead of workers? I am hearing ai is intelligent and can take over the world, replace workers, cure disease. Why doesn't the board buy a subscription and make it work for them?
Does there need to be changes?
Not exactly - in the Belarus case the plane was in the Belarusian airspace and had to land in Belarus (and then two passengers were arrested). If Belarus had revoked permission before the plane entered its airspace, and it had to land in Ukraine or Poland due to insufficient fuel, nothing would have happened to those passengers.
Feed all this blogs through a LLM, then ask it.
They'll squeak by.
Right!!! I would love some more competition in the electric riding lawnmower arena, or just a choice of electric lawn/garden tractors and UTV's in general.
> Any application logging real world events against unix time will screw up velocities, force, energy, etc when computing "instrument reading" per "unix second".

That is a fair point for situations that depend on short term observations. But, UTC has the same issues there as Unix epoch. I think it is a valid edge case but if you are doing, say, GPS based speed calc I would wager you are already pulling your time reference from a low level source that you can depend on will be running steadily for the X minutes/hours you need it.
Maybe he will learn to capitalize words at the beginning of sentences. In all seriousness, I find the habit of “higher ups” to answer emails like teenagers texting on a T9 phone worthy of a sociology paper. Perhaps it is the written equivalent of Mark Zuckerberg’s hoodies. I found his return to office ideas early on in COVID sickening.
You mean "yeah we were lying yesterday about this same thing, but we're telling the truth right now" type of negotiation? Has that ever worked for ransoms (of any kind) anywhere?
Did some more reading, can't find much conclusive, you might be right, this reddit post is probably one of the better discussions

https://www.reddit.com/r/biology/comments/cqes9/why_does_blo...
If you like this, Jeroen van Bergeijk has been writing about his doing such jobs undercover for a decade. I don't know that he was translated, but a documentary I think was.
more risk of exposure presumably
I am the original commentor. My intention was to form an assertion that could be disproved via a counterexample.

Let me try again:
Why should citizen A have to involuntarily transfer their private property gained through voluntary economic transactions to citizen B?
To remove, for the airlines, the old grey market of resold "non-refundable" tickets that which the original purchaser can no longer utilize that existed before the ID requirement.

There is more profit in being able to sell an unoccupied seat twice (once for the unused non-refundable ticket, a second time when the original ticket does not show up at the gate) than in allowing tickets to be resold on the grey market.
I fly Southwest too. I like the flexibility that they provide.

If you don't feel like flying today, that's fine with them. No change fees. However, sometimes they don't feel like flying either, and you also need to extend them the same courtesy.
Spent time with my partner and finished reading The End and the Death, Volume II by Dan Abnett.
There's an iterated prisoner's dilemma, I wouldn't go as far as calling that honour.
FTC Will Require Microsoft to Pay $20M
Yevgeny Prigozhin's?
Y'all are impressive—Kudos!
My brother did this with lawn care and HVAC companies. The first business lesson he learned was never name your business after yourself. He was about 16 when he learned this and ever since it’s been like AAA Lawn Care or Aces HVAC until he gets so many negative reviews he can’t get more business.
I'm in agreement that EV's are not a panacea, less cars and consumerism would be better, and the political difficulties of reducing those are especially fraught.

However, since rich westerners did the politically realistic move of increasing emissions standards and EV's, we are actually reducing our emissions[0], instead of doing nothing but hand-wringing that we "should" have less cars and get nowhere because 3/4 of the US won't have it.

Per capita US emissions are down 25% since 2007 and peaked back in 1979.

We help the environment by finding the wins whereever we can politically. If you get too idealistic, you halt progress because the rest of westerners aren't in for the ride.

[0]https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/united-states
Paying a fee per job done, rather than a wage per hour of labor, is literally the entire point of the gig economy. Uber/DoorDash/etc. claim this is a perk, since you can set your own hours.

However, food delivery gig workers in New York City and a few other places have recently successfully won the right to earn a fixed minimum wage: https://www.thecity.nyc/2023/09/28/minimum-hourly-pay-court-...
Because you write your ransomware to encrypt to a hardcoded set of public keys that include an SGX attestation from those instances. This can be verified forensically and the unencrypted plaintext never leaves the victim organization.
I'd be curious what would happen given RLHF to try to penalize illegal/immoral/unethical activity.

I had always dismissed Asimov's "rules of robotics" as silly: nobody would ever design a mission-critical robot with indeterminate stochastic behavior! Maybe I should reconsider and re-read those stories, because people seem very eager to do just that.
Dollar-denominated bank accounts are a bigger factor for binance.
tbqh, any serious paper writing requires formatting considerations that Markdown cannot express.

Like, if you care at all about how your paper looks, Markdown is insufficient.
Parsing is faster than generating, so having a small model produce a whole output and then have Goliath only produce "good/bad" single token response evaluation would be faster than having Goliath produce everything. This would be the extreme, adhoc and iterative version of speculative decoding, which is already a thing and would probably give the best compromise
That is actually possible. For example, someone wrote python code to do this for the massive open source model BLOOM.

However, it's still slow as tar. When I was running the BLOOM model I think my inference time was 1 token / m.

See:
https://towardsdatascience.com/run-bloom-the-largest-open-ac...
It's unimaginable that any advertisers took their word for it and dropped their Twitter ad budget simply because Media Matters said so. At the most, Media Matters might have called their attention to it (if it wasn't already on the advertisers' radio, which it almost certainly was).
Well yeah it is. Maybe its good point to remember when people ask Why in the world these C-level executives get paid so much?
No, its not necessary to load it in all at once, you could in theory make it stream in chunks of layers.
It’s not that simple… it depends on how you admit the mistake. If done with strength, leadership, etc., and a clear plan to fix the issue it can make you look really good. If done with groveling, shame, and approval seeking, what you are saying will happen.
Thanks for the quick fix, Dan!

So do you have the ability to pin deeply nested comments or do you have to remove it from the existing thread for this to work?

Someone else proposed this first but didn't think pinning worked on nested comments.

Edit: The original author asked not to be pinned in a subcomment, so I don't know now ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
Only to the extent that they derive value from being perceived as consistent.
Such as? Unless they are in the habit of downloading multiterraby copies of the trained model and taking.g it home what IP would they have? The training data is the open internet and various licensed archives far to much for them to take and arguably isn't OAI IP anyway. The background is all bases on openly published research much of it released by Google. And Microsoft already has licensed pretty much everything from OAI as part of that multi billion dollar deal.
The inability to clearly and publicly -- or even if not publicly, to the OpenAI employees! -- explain a rationale for this is simply astounding.
> They are only opposed to state coercion, but market pressures can certainly be coercive and they don't resist that.

Market pressures aren't coercion, they're called incentives.

> And by what mechanism would anarcho-capitalists prevent the selling of children or child labor? They don't hold that the state has such a power.

Anarcho-capitalism has never been put into practice, so the specifics are speculative. Just as the specifics of a functioning democratic republic were speculative until the theory was put into practice.

Right now, the government has a monopoly on "justice". If you have a criminal or civil case before the courts, your case is judged according to the "common law", by a state-selected "common judge". In anarcho-capitalism, both the law and the judge would be optional. You choose your law and your judge, I choose mine, and they get together and figure out the case. "Judicial services" organizations interact and cut deals with each other all the time--the only difference is that, right now, they're all run by governments.

This begs the question of good faith (I could just say "my judge is me, and my law is that I do whatever the fuck that I want", but the incentives of such a choice don't make sense. If I murder you, who would provide justice? Thus everyone is incentivized to pay for, one way or another "judicial services", such that if you need them, they are able to come to your aid. This sounds ridiculous on its face, but if you actually think about it, it makes plenty of sense. We pay ~30% of our incomes in taxes in the US, and only a vanishingly small proportion goes to pay for government-monopolized "judicial services". It would likely be pretty cheap--just do the math on how much of your taxes go to paying for the judicial system.

But wait! All that would need to happen to enable child slavery would be for someone to form a legal-services corporation which would not view this as a crime! Sure, but for such a corporation to actually function, they would have to be viewed as legitimate by other legal-services corporations. Can you imagine GEIKO judicial services doing business with an organization that's on the record enabling child slavery? Neither can I.

Thus, if you sold a child into slavery, that child would naturally have a case against you, as you sold something that didn't belong to you and did them tremendous damage.

It's worth remembering that, while such a system might be imperfect, the current system is far from perfect. As with everything else, the state is pretty shit at preventing children from being bought and sold.

> The Children also don't consent to be even their parents' wards, so the consent of children is not a sufficient framework to construct a basis of opposition.

Children don't pick their parents, ergo consent isn't a thing? I don't buy it, and by golly, my legal-services corp won't stand for it!

> Markets don't have the will to decline child exploitation.

Markets have the will to fire people for racist tweets, but not to fight child exploitation?

> and anarcho-capitalism doesn't invest an entity with the power to prevent it.

Yes it does, as mentioned above.
Ok so maybe just put it on the github readme? "Inspired by Oban, and X, and Y..."

JFC One line of code you don't even have to test
I don't think you read the EPIC post, or the part I quoted. You're creating a new, more reasonable argument that is loosely aligned with the second, lesser concern that EPIC had.
not sure what you think should happen. there’s a limited number of seats per flight. if there’s 10 available seats left and 8 suddenly booked why should the last ones be priced the same
Trillions of random chances over the course of billions of years.
I think there's some more important factors to add. Many of these problems are exceptionally complex and have no universal solution due to the chaotic nature (i.e. perturbations in initial conditions cause large variations). Often politicians are presenting simple solutions and the voters also are asking for simple solutions. So politicians consider what can be done within an election cycle and voters are not considering the effects of policy often have delayed onsets and the effects will not honestly be known for several election cycles. This is especially interesting to see as many people choose the president based on the current state of the economy. This is conditioned on several bad premises: 1) the president is the major driver of the economy, 2) policies have immediate effects (or at least short term onsets), 3) the economy is predominantly politically driven. These are all examples of short term thinking but there are more complex interactions at play as well. We haven't even talked about congress. Some of these things aren't even true under dictatorships. I'm not sure why we frame them this way but I think it is a destructive feedback loop.
OpenAI, Microsoft hit with new US consumer privacy class action
Why is that so many in this thread state opinions as matter of facts, but at the same time you can tell they don't have a clue? Is this how you guys party here?
Translation: "I am sorry my coup attempt did not go as planned. Forgive me please?"
I guess he might start with "AI would at least spell my name right." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz

You may be interested in Lex Fridman's interview with Eugenia Kuyda: https://lexfridman.com/eugenia-kuyda/. Among other things, they discuss what Eugenia did with machine learning in response a close friend's death, in an attempt to preserve him and conversation with him.
This kind of stuff (Matè) makes it hard for me to maintain composure. Especially Barkley==Ciba Geigy shill falsehoods. Barkley continues to clearly show overwhelming evidence of the existence, severity, and genetic basis of ADHD.
Tether says it has frozen $225M linked to human trafficking
the second one.

There was a big fight in washington/seattle https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/seattle/seattle-cit...

Lot's of misinfo/disinfo being disseminated from doordash/instacart etc about how unfair it is and how it will kill it's business. If your business can't survive your workers being paid minimum wage, maybe you shouldn't be in business.
That's 10 hour days. No one should be forced to do that. If you want to have at it, but factoring in they probably don't get lunch paid and at least a 30min commute time and you have have extreme diminished personal life very quickly. No one should scoff at a 50 hour work week.
There is no ambiguity there. You will get an economy seat or better. If non-premium seats available you will have an option to select one for free. If not, they will assign a premium economy or a comfort+ seat at the time of check-in. If the flight is overbooked having a preselected seat does not guarantee you won't be bumped.

This is something I've observed with different airlines. Google's line "Free seat selection" doesn't guarantee availability of seats to choose from, just that you won't be charged for selecting one if available for your fare.
> My workflow (that I share with co-authors) is to write everything in Markdown (using Pandoc to get PDF output). When we are almost finished, we export (again with Pandoc) to LaTeX.

That's your (and my) workflow. However, there is clearly demand for a collaborative workflow, as demonstrated by Overleaf and ShareLaTeX before that.
1. Using `classoption: twocolumn`

2. I see that I wasn't completely clear. I meant: why do we want to see our collaborators' changes in real time? To me, that would be very disturbing.
TLDR:

Rule 1: Use GitHub to Track Your Projects
Rule 2: GitHub for Single Users, Teams, and Organizations
Rule 3: Developing and Collaborating on New Features: Branching and Forking
Rule 4: Naming Branches and Commits: Tags and Semantic Versions
Rule 5: Let GitHub Do Some Tasks for You: Integrate
Rule 6: Let GitHub Do More Tasks for You: Automate
Rule 7: Use GitHub to Openly and Collaboratively Discuss, Address, and Close Issues
Rule 8: Make Your Code Easily Citable, and Cite Source Code!
Rule 9: Promote and Discuss Your Projects: Web Page and More
Rule 10: Use GitHub to Be Social: Follow and Watch
True, but then the board would have been able to get rid of the controversy on the spot by spelling out their reasoning. Nobody would fault them. But that didn't happen, and even one of the people that voted for Altmans' removal has backtracked. So this is all extremely murky and suspicious.

If they had a valid reason they should spell it out. But my guess is that reason, assuming it exists, will just open them up to more liability and that is why it isn't given.

> But more incredulous than the board's decision is the claim that it owes any duty to its for-profit subsidiary's employees, who aren't even shareholders, but some profit-sharing paper's holders.

Technically they took over the second they fired Altman so they have no way to pretend they have no responsibility. Shareholders and employees of the for-profit were all directly affected by this decision, the insulating properties of a non-profit are not such that you can just do whatever you want and get away with it.
The title should be changed to reflect that the checkpoints were released 1.5 years ago [1], and the paper was published almost 3 years ago [2]. IMO "releases" means that it was released recently, but that's not the case.

[1] https://github.com/google-research/t5x/commit/199f226eeff5f8...

[2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03961
I'm using Deno's SaaSKit for this: https://github.com/denoland/saaskit
Wait what is happening with Ilya? I thought he agreed to kick Sam out but he tweeted that he regretted it? I don’t understand what is going on
Open Problems in DAOs
This has been the case as long as companies existed. Even with all this, companies still have boards because they represent the interests of several people.
"enough money every month to fully cover basic food, basic shelter, and basic expenses"
This is one of the most insightful comments I've seen on this whole situation.
> Elon Musk is promising to file a “thermonuclear lawsuit” first thing Monday morning against nonprofit Media Matters

Well, it's Monday afternoon in California now - did he actually file a lawsuit, or was he full of shit?
As someone who flies into and out of the US fairly regularly-ish ... the way I'm treated by Homeland Security when I fly with my wife & son vs. alone, is a bit shocking.

Alone: I'm asked what I am doing there (despite having a US passport; so it shouldn't matter), why I live in a foreign country instead of the US, what I do for a living, why I have a backpack on instead of suitcase, etc. While they sit there holding my passport hostage, scrolling through who knows what data... sometimes I even "randomly" get sent to a back room to have all my stuff dumped out and my phone confiscated. It's like they want to make _really_ sure I never come visit my parents.

With my family: welcome home! Have fun!

If you want to sneak into the US, just go with a wife and kids. /s
Nah, the prevailing sentiment was that there would be more outages and instability, which was true.
What an utterly pointless post. You need to show us the details on what went in there.

Like this:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wj6j3U5r8ixVf_RQXwRYD03Du...
Uh.... Are we gonna go through the definition of any? I believe any means... Any.

Including their head researcher.

I'm not continuing this. Your position is about as tenable as the boards. Equally rigid as well.
Bitcoin mining is energizing sustainability through green innovation
Isn’t the point that the more advanced the model, the leas deterministic it becomes?
It is definitely a design constraint that we have to consider but at the same time the relatively small change in weight during the flight is also good for our balance, given we won't be putting the fuel in the wings. All in all, the sources of weight are pretty different between the conventional jet-kerosene versus our hydrogen electric propulsion, which is what is driving us to a clean sheet design to take maximum advantage of HEP. We are doing a 15-seat retrofit of a Beech 1900D as our first product, and while it is a great MVP, the landing weight constraint, amongst others, make it a little less capable, with 800km range, than the conventional version.
My favorite take from another HN comment, sadly I didnt save the UN for attribution:

> Since this whole saga is so unbelievable: what if... board member Tasha McCauley's husband Joseph Gordon-Levitt orchestrated the whole board coup behind the scenes so he could direct and/or star in the Hollywood adaptation?