skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If the emissions (of CO2, etc) have an impact on global climate doesn't that mean a measurable effect on emissions has an impact on global climate? If you have doubts about emissions impacting climate say that, but that's another discussion.

There are many things not directly measurable which have an impact. Example: when learning a new programming language reading one paragraph of a tutorial does not have a measurable effect on you knowing the language - for most paragraphs. But if you read zero paragraphs you might not know anything.
Aside from the article, I do really like the idea of implementing board game rules as a coding exercise. The only one I’ve ever been confronted with was tic tac toe, and I remember really having fun with the detecting winning moves part.
Nobody cares what you think about it either.
A glossary definition? Try instead with the guide: https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#product-owner
Yes but not one specific entity profits from all the vehicular carnage that happens daily. Daily accidents are part of our societal experience.

More importantly Any one profiting entity Putting robot cars which they surely know aren't ready for prime time but say or act they are is beyond egregious! Such startups or companies who do such things to win this race at all cost is putting profits/market share over the safety they bang their drum about and thus such behavior willfully harms & has harmed innocent lives. Both Uber and Cruise acted as such and both now are no longer because if it!

Human beings over technology that kills everyday for me unless they've proven like Waymo's track record /behavior shows they truly are about safety first .. human beings over profits/market share. Though I'd still love to know after cruise's incident did Waymo push out a software update ..uggh if so.
How often does:

"Please write me ..."

occur in training data? And why does it still work?
Finally a two wheeled vehicle that will command some respect in Amsterdam traffic. I'll take it.
It really does beggar belief. I’d love to do interviews with the team, I’ll bet somebody knows why this happened, even if they’re not eager to talk about it.
"As long-term investors, we would value companies on their customers, deep partnerships, talent and long-term defensible moat,” he said. “Where does that all sit today with OpenAI?”

A parson gone to the bad, still wearing the robes and collar. But no man is damned for eternity until the devil claims him for his own. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
If you think child labor or unsafe and inhumane working conditions started with the industrial revolution your history teachers have deeply failed you. Those existed long before industrialization. Hell, for most of history education was child labor!
But that 20% that makes all the difference will only make a difference when the phone is new.

Otherwise the opposite is true. Refraining to charge fully makes all the difference and saves you from a tough spot.

Which in turn is why (was a bigger problem before) the sentiment that it doesn't matter how good/bad battery life I have as long as it lasts me a day. Well, if you do a complete cycle every day a year old phone will not last a day anymore...
As I've just written on Lemmy, Typst is so good that I've donated a couple of times. The one dealbreaker for me, though, is the current lack of locale-aware decimal separators: https://github.com/typst/typst/issues/1093

There's a workaround, though.
Cool! Seems very productive. Only thing I'm thinking of is reliability and the lack of control since you aren't hosting it yourself.
I have had the (conspiracy) theory for a while that this is by design. Kept happening to me on an account where I've disabled watch-history. Now I'm watching on an account where it's enabled and it hasn't happened even once. And it's been months since I switched.

Actually not sure if it's even that far fetched. Making the logged-out-experience worse on purpose is something all the big internet firms do.
Indeed, very useful, thanks for the tip!
But where can I see real data and graphs about millions of batteries in phones and laptops, not these anecdata "i have a phone which lasted blah years".
European Acceleration [EU/Acc]
I take the opposite view, as a recent Blazor convert since the just released .NET 8 we're now recommending Blazor for any new .NET Web App (excl. CDN Hostable, SSG websites).

I was short on Blazor before .NET 8 and could only seriously recommend it for Internal Apps since the compromises for using either of Blazor's Server or WASM Interactivity delivered a poor UX for Intranet hosted Apps as covered by this post.

However that's changed in .NET 8 Blazor's default Static Rendering where you're effectively able to develop traditional Server Rendered Apps like Razor Pages/MVC but with Blazor's superior component model, advanced features like Streaming Rendering and its built-in (smart) Enhanced Navigation which gives simple Server Rendered App's SPA-like responsiveness without any of npm's build tool complexity, need to manage separate client routing, heavy client state, npm dependencies, large JS bundles, etc.

Even better is that you no longer need to use Blazor Interactivity for any Web App features, e.g. which we avoid in our "Blazor Vue" (100% SSR) Tailwind template that progressively enhances statically rendered Blazor content with Vue.js. I cover this approach in detail in our ".NET 8's Best Blazor" [1] blog post.

As it embraces the simplicity of "No Build" JavaScript Modules (i.e. avoiding npm deps + build tools) it's now become my preferred approach for most .NET Web Apps.

Blazor Diffusion [2] is an example App built using this template, originally developed in Blazor Server, deployed as WASM but now converted to "Blazor SSR + Vue", source code available at [3].

[1] https://servicestack.net/posts/net8-best-blazor

[2] https://blazordiffusion.com

[3] https://github.com/NetCoreApps/BlazorDiffusionVue
> So please, enough of the dumb "$device is only $2USD because its only a bunch of 2c resistors and capacitors on a PCB".

The thread was about literal parts costs and how knowing those means nothing to the value of a produced item. In which case, a BOM is directly and literally applicable.

No one is saying what you're so annoyed and frustrated about. Literally the entire thread is about how the value of a product is far greater than it's actual parts cost and why knowing that is useless for negotiation.

Learn to listen/read before you get yourself into a tissy about a made up sleight.
I guess I'm thinking from an Australian perspective. I did notice houses were significantly cheaper in America.

I should have just said if you own a house anywhere near a metropolitan area.
I call it one pm (who will tell you that he can totally code) at the offshore party.
Sam Altman exposes the charade of AI accountability
When the Algorithm Encourages You to Commit Suicide
https://archive.ph/Y3TMl
> OpenAI was literally founded on the promise of keeping AGI out of the hands of “big tech companies”.

Where does it say that?
Oh that’s a fun mechanic. Interesting that you could just win outright if your chess opponent gave you five free moves out the gate. Maybe for chess you could add the proviso, “x free moves but you can’t move into a position where your piece is threatened”
This is real failed state stuff.
I don't think we are that far apart. I don't disagree that there are certain ideals to aspire to.

However, practically, we find out time and time again that these ideals are not enough to sustain themselves and that in the defense of those ideals there are trade offs to be made that compromise them to some extent. Realising some idealised version would require different humans and I don't subscribe to ideas of realities that need those (in the same way that that speaks against idealist versions of collectivism).

The real debate is then what trade offs to make and there we might not agree but that is totally fine and part of the process.
It would be more efficient use of tax payers money to work with Kraken and Coinbase directly and set up rules for what tokens should be securities or not.

Like the EU, Hong Kong, Japan and other countries are doing.
Yes, large governments have less power over an individual. The president / prime minister can't decide that I deserve to be executed for a traffic offense.

A small feudal lord has fewer subjects, but also fewer (no) limits. Nothing preventing him from killing you without repercussions on a whim.
> The real value in crypto is having a currency that isn't subjected to the whims of governments and the people that control monetary policy alongside the massive payment networks like Visa and MasterCard. Controlling the flow of money allows pseudo bans on things the people that control those systems don't like.

Would you say the same is true of arms trafficking or contraband in general? Personally, I can't think of a reason why a society wouldn't want to control who and what goes into and out of its territory.
You may reasonably asssume that Twitter does and does not.

Twitter will try to group users into audiences, probably in ways no human really understands even if some humans know enough to read the log files and databases. Do you read Czech tweets? You probably understand that language, then, so you're added to the appropriate bucket of users. Do you retweet things later that go viral? Do you retweet things that are later deleted by moderators?

Another company that did something very like this for recommendation purposes ended up with considerably more than 1000 audiences, and the nazis were concentrated into fewer than 100 of those, even though separating nazis from the rest wasn't a goal. Not perfectly concentrated.
Handling Backpressure in Distributed Systems
SpaceX's Starship should be ready to fly again before Christmas, Elon Musk says
They need to just give up and stop fighting the ad-blockers: they can't win, unless they try to force everyone to use a special app to watch YouTube, which obviously isn't going to fly.

There's plenty of losers out there who can't or won't use ad-blockers that they can make their ad money on; trying to harass the 20% of users who use ad-blockers is just an arms race they can't win.
Honestly depends on cycle life is the thing. I believe anything can be made at volume: whether it is depends on whether it's actually genuinely useful enough when you do - hence a lot of the quiet "revolutionary" things which go away (because actually, all the other trade offs eliminate the revolutionary bit).
That's kind of my point. The SEC does not have a mandate to evaluate the merits of transactions or determine whether a securities investment is "good" or "bad". However, it's possible that they are effectively doing so by making the securities registration process for crypto tokens so stringent, it becomes impossible to fulfill. If it was actually possible to register crypto token securities with the SEC, why doesn't anyone do so instead of battling the SEC in court?
I can recommend the "Bad Teeth No Bar" book for more ideas

https://onlinebicyclemuseum.co.uk/colins-new-book/?tax=tour&...
Banksy Revealed? Artist Confirms Name in Lost BBC Interview
Nothing public, sorry. I do consulting on how to convert AIs from CUDA to C++ to save money. With a good quantization, you can sometimes replace a $19k A100 with a $0.5k EPYC. And especially for apps and/or WebGL interference, you want small models.

Anyway, if you quantize to -1, 0, or +1 and then use arithmetic coding, you come out at around 1.58 bits per parameter. And then by skewing the distribution with forced sparsity, you have something like 5% x -1, 90% x 0, 5% x +1 which comes out at about 0.6 bits per parameter after arithmetic coding.

I used that on "gpt_neox.layers.*.mlp.dense_h_to_4h.weight" (HuggingFace PyTorch implementation), for example. But for other layers you need more bits. For example, I could never get gpt_neox.embed_in.weight to less than 2% -2, 8% -1, 80% 0, 8% +1, 2% +2 which comes out at around 1.1 bits per parameter [1]. And then stuff like gpt_neox.layers.0.attention.query_key_value.weight will drive up your overall bits per parameter because those are very difficult to quantize or sparsify. That 1.5 was the average over the entire model and some layers compress even better while others compress worse.

[1] example calculation: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=-%28log2%280.02%29*0.02...
Full .NET stack.

- Self-hosted identity management, "ASP.NET Core Identity", using new scaffolding from .NET 8

- Blazor, using the "Auto" mode from .NET 8: Default to SSR, autopromote to Server mode for live updating components

- EF Core for DB handling

The idea is to focus on keeping things simple and easy for the developer. The most annoying part about the stack is the way Microsoft names things.

Keeping the rendering logic fully server-side lets you use your EF DbContext/entities directly in your components, taking on some (I'd say minor) technical debt to greatly simplify development.

You won't need a fully separate SPA with a dedicated API. Not yet, maybe ever. You can migrate your components to Blazor Wasm piecemeal if/when you reach a stage where using Server mode starts giving you troubles.
I wouldn't be so sure. It's like criminals who steal passwords. Sometimes they just want to bulk sell the passwords at a lower value rather than delving into the accounts for higher gain. Sometimes they just want rid.

In this case, I wouldn't be surprised if the group want to make it clear that they're serious for other high-value targets
I was wondering this, myself. I think there's a two-fold reason for this, but please take the following opinion as just an opinion from where I'm standing.

1. We don't usually side with The Board™ in these types of stories. Company boards are typically, from an outside perspective, in place to protect the interests of shareholders, which in turn are typically viewed as profit-seeking puppet masters. This is such a meme that it makes it into our tv shows and movies regularly, further reinforcing the belief that The Board™ = Evil. A story where the board is actually trying to uphold some ethical stance as a core value is foreign to the accepted and collective understand of how things work.

2. Sam Altman, much like Elon Musk and Donald Trump, has an army of sycophants at his disposal, and understands how to use them. We forget that people get swept up in the magic and promise of someone else's perceived "genius" regardless of our intelligence. Being human, we want a savior or role model of sorts to stand behind, and further being human, we're willing to gaslight ourselves about such a person, ignore their questionable aspects, and get pretty irrational about our devotion to their cause. This is not exclusive to people with less education or whatever, but something we all do to some degree, and people like Sam understand this. So, his narrative gets a much much louder shout while also appearing to evade any real scrutiny.

In the end, we may have become so negative in our worldview that we are collectively subject to these kinds of cognitive traps, which is disturbing in and of itself.

Again, just my opinion as to why the audience seems to not be on the "The board is the good guy!" train.
The decentralization of the real world: an Unruly thesis
I see what you mean. And I believe that to actually become wealthy enough to be considered wealthy you sort of need to lack self-awareness and be willing to roll on others regardless of how much pain you are going to inflict. I think a large ego and accompanying egoistic behavior is almost a requirement.
Otherwise, you don't get rich because at many crossroads you find yourself in situations where you understand how unfair some things are and your awareness prevents you from taking part in this mess.

My experience is that they generally are low quality humans considering many variables. Yet they successfully secured a large amount of ressource. Our system is completely broken in that it rewards the worst behavior at almost all stages of the game.
I am a bit disillusioned, but I doubt it is possible to have material success without cheating/lying and the like in our current society. But that is probably true for a while now...
The percentage is irrelevant, what matters is the charge termination voltage, which AFAIK is lower on all electric cars because you care about battery longevity. I.e. if the same cells were in a laptop, your car showing 100% might only be 80% in the laptop, and it's all good.

(What the actual charge termination voltage [and cell type] is, I sadly don't know and don't know where to find…)
if you want to get up and running quickly, choose what you're familiar with.

personally, I'd go with Rails + SQLite. skip OAuth unless you absolutely need it.

> Simple user dashboard with some live updates (Websockets, SignalR, etc)

you probably don't need live updates in v0.1. skip it.

> Blog (simple db read/write)

any static site generator + markdown. I use nanoc, but any SSG would do.
And what if Coinbase's lawyers did all that, the SEC told them in those informal consultations that these altcoins that Coinbase wanted to list sure look a lot like securities, but Coinbase executives decided they'd rather ask forgiveness later because there was so much money to be made pushing all those VC-funded tokens onto retail investors while the good times lasted.

The fundamental problem here is that nobody in crypto is acting in good faith. They're just looking for loopholes to exploit. Publishing more guidance is pointless against such actors. Remember, this is an industry where Sam Bankman-Fried stood out as the honest guy who wants to play along with regulators.
Rails (front and back)

Turbo handles live updates

For authentication, I'd use the devise gem, and plan for OAuth later.

I'd use Pundit for authorisation.

I'd use sendgrid for email and stripe for payment.

I'd host on FlyIO; though I'd consider Heroku as 50$ a month would likely cover most needs, and it's super simple.

All up blog would take about an hour.

Then it's about style, and for that I'd go with w3schools css. There are a pile of templates and it's dirt simple to add. IMHO tailwinds is a sledge hammer when most need a ball-peen hammer.
This used to be an easy problem to fix, by replacing the battery.

Shame that seems to be harder and harder to find on new phones.
Because it takes time, not just data. To set up infrastrcuture, to do tests, to train, etc. Hell, it takes Boeing itself several decades to design a new aircraft model, even though they have done it several times before.

The US for example trying to get back some of its domestic manufacturing prowess, after decades which has outsourced it to China which has gotten really good at it, has a 10-20 year barrier to overcome before it can even start to get to the same level, and that's if all goes well and no stupid decisions are made. Which is not very likely.
You're correct with ASCII! My original idea was to use T9, but my ultimate goal is to use this as a way of writing code.

Currently waiting on a small oled screen to print out the # inputs and corresponding last-typed character.
Thanks, cool stuff!
R&D definitely forms a huge part of many product costs, and not for many products where you just churn them out by the millions

For a plane, it's going to be the former

That and the reason it's easy to get a BOM of cheap products is because you can buy them and tear them down. I can't see Airbus managing to buy a boeing and tear the entire thing down without Boeing noticing
Article title insufficiently fawning over Dear Leader, I'd assume; the Muskovites are pretty sensitive about this sort of thing.
I've had smart charging in other laptops for ages as well. I'm not saying Apple isn't doing good, I'm just disputing the "Apple is on another league" sentiment, when it's mostly based on a lack of knowledge of what's happening outside the Apple ecosystem.
I still miss it to this day, for basic texting it was the superior system.
Heh ;-)

The guide is says pretty much what i say. "How this is done may vary widely across organizations, Scrum Teams, and individuals."

OTOH, The humane, real-world understanding of the word "product" and the word "owner" coming together should prime over whatever definition there is, because none reads definitions except for the purpose of an argument ;-)
Well, if you've managed to create an airliner, starting from not having made one at all before, then the sound isolation would be the most trivial thing to improve in an update.
do you know if the LLM was fine-tuned in any way to the sparsity & quantisation? Or did it just work out of the box?
Has anyone used rule engines in a large production system? What was the use case?
I'm not sure that _Ken Paxton_'s involvement bolsters the credibility of the suit any.
I see, that makes sense. There's plenty of airlines like Ryan Air and Allegient who operate thin routes to secondary airports. A 50 seater seems perfect for operators who specialize in thin routes. How ironic if budget airlines beat traditional airlines in becoming carbon neeutral.
> I always wonder why people suddenly lose “trust” in a brand, as if it was a concrete of internal relationships

Brand is just shorthand for trust in their future, managed by a credible team. I.e. relationships.

A lot of OpenAI’s reputation is/was Sam Altman’s reputation.

Altman has proven himself to be exceptional, part of which is (of course) being able to be seen as exceptional.

Just the latter has tremendous relationship power: networking, employee acquisition/retention, and employee vision alignment.

Proof of his internal relationship value: employees quitting to go with him

Proof of his external relationship value: Microsoft willing to hire him and his teammates, with near zero notice, to maintain (or eclipse) his power over the OpenAI relationship.

How can investors ignore a massive move of talent, relationships & leverage from OpenAi to Microsoft?

How do investors ignore the board’s inability to resolve poorly communicated disputes with non-disastrous “solutions”?

Evidence of value moving? Shares of Microsoft rebounded from Friday to a new record high.

There go those wacky investors, re-evaluating “brand” value!
This seems to be good advice for single cells. But what about packs with cells wired in series and parallel? My understanding is, that packs always come with a battery management system (BMS) that will balance the cell voltages and therefore compensate for slight variations between cells that can manifest during use and charging. This seems to be necessary for both performance and longevity of the pack. Now the question is, do these BMSs work properly if you never or rarely charge your pack to 100%? I tend to charge packs to 100% to give the BMS a chance to do the balancing and then keep it off a charger for as long as possible. Not sure if my thinking is correct though. Maybe someone with more knowledge could chime in.
Issues is: how can I know is app working correctly? I have 15 apps "in memory", my phone started lagging, what should I do?
I don't think Beeper can promise end to end encryption for 3rd party services either. Fundamentally if you're interfacing with a service like iMessage or Whatsapp - even if they offer end to end encryption - the message has to be decrypted and then sent to the 3rd party app. Unless that gateway is running on your phone, the messages have to be decrypted in the cloud somewhere. At that point, you are placing all your trust in the 3rd party app's cloud services.

Obviously they can still make better decisions than these guys - don't write confidential data to your logs! Don't unencrypted HTTP APIs! But unless the gateways to the 3rd party services run locally, you will never have end to end security.

Edit: Beeper has published their bridges as open source, so you could self-host it. That would at least give you full control of the stack. https://github.com/beeper/self-host
"OpenAI has launched GPTs (such a bad name),"

- I totally agree with you on that!!!

I prefer gipeties ( I even bought the domain gipeties.com )