skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I remember once migrating from a system with periodic service contracts, where the old system set dates for all future contracted services at time of signing and the new one just calculated them as in start on X date then every 2 weeks. Ball ache. Having everything scripted so we could just keep running and tweaking and running and tweaking till it was right, then press go on the day was a good way to go. Of course the whole project was cancelled just before go live, but the migration worked like a charm.
Another angle is premiums paid vs claims awarded. If an elderly patient has paid in 50k over a lifetime and is making a 100k claim, now is an okay time to lose that customer.
Correct except for the "share with your wife" bit. That implies intentional deception, which does not appear to be what the developer is doing.
Citation needed for that last claim, as it's patently absurd.
We just had a great experience working with US TECH (https://ustech-lab.com).

The price was reasonable (for what it is), the main contact was great, they were very fast and super flexible with our delays.

I know they offer CE, but we just went for FCC on unintentional emitters. It wasn't nearly as challenging as we thought it would be.

Expect to pay something around $2,500 to $5,000 depending on how labor intensive your tests are, or become.
Guess the last member of whatever team implemented magazine subscription just got promoted out of that team.
2023 Cybersecurity Black Friday Deals
Usually it is great for those of us that sell consulting services, for the others not really.
Hey, the maker here.

The custom GPT resume writer will convert your existing PDF or plain text content into an organized, well-formatted, rewritten, and ATS-optimized version of your resume. It really fulfills many parameters with its enhancements. It provides actionable recommendations and explains itself in detail.

The enhanced resume, or CV if you're in Europe, can be used for work, job searches, and more. Most importantly, I'm trying to help people tailor their resumes to specific vacancies. You can share the link in a chat, or you can copy and paste the requirements from the new job position description, and the Resume Writer will produce a well-formatted, clean markdown resume optimized for that particular position.

And, I guess, this is the main thing that happens in ChargeGPT (if you have access to ChatGPT Plus, unfortunately), the GPT itself comes for free.

You can always take that enhanced resume out of the chat and do more with it using resume-building software-as-a-service tools. The Resume Writer GPT is powered by the latest GPT technology and simply does the job.

Enjoy.
To continue to access previously purchased magazine content, you must export and save each purchased issue before December 18, 2023.

Sounds like you can keep it?
>Car size has not been increasing because of safety regulations

Not exclusively, no. But a regulatory regime considering only occupants' safety and not the safety of the other party in crashes is inherently biased towards larger vehicles. And various other regulations favor large SUVs/trucks over cars, from historical fuel efficiency rules to more recent depreciation schedules.
Shop at Amazon. If it doesn't match the description return it. I usually buy daylight bulbs and only one time did I have color matching problems even with different brands.
So the end result is that you live in a society where the average quality of education and health care slowly plummets to zero?

That is not a sustainable solution for society.
If you talk in general about bad choices, you are right.

On the specific topic of reprocessing though. Reprocessing achieves 2 things: 1. it can extract usable fissile fuel from spent fuel, and 2. it can reduce the amount of long lived radioactive waste, by a factor of 30. Point 1 can be further split in 1.a. usable fuel for the current generation reactors and 1.b. usable fuel for future, fast reactors (U-238).

1.a. Per wikipedia [1]

Reprocessing the plutonium into usable fuel increases the energy derived from the original uranium by some 12%, and if the uranium-235 is also recycled by re-enrichment, this becomes about 20%

In other words, all this reprocessing can reduce overall the total volume of uranium mined and spent fuel by 20%. That's not a game changer, and it certainly does not come for free.

1.b. reprocessing in order to extract U-238 for fast reactors. That's a nice concept, but if we ever build fast reactors that can burn U-238 (fingers crossed), we already have a huge stockpile of depleted uranium. The US alone has more than half a million tons, and the rest of the world at least as much. That's enough to keep the lights on in the entire world for hundreds of years.

2. reprocessing in order to reduce the waste. That makes sense. But burying the waste is probably cheaper. We have already buried hundreds of thousands of tons of waste at WIPP. We know it works and it is safe. We know we will need to eventually bury some waste, even if its 30 times lower. If we, as a society, agree to open some deep geological repositories for nuclear waste, then it doesn't make all that much of a difference if we bury 10000 tons or a million tons.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOX_fuel

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_Isolation_Pilot_Plant
what about flucation of solar radiation and wind force?
In the real world, the grid got almost shut down by the Russian war and the salvation came from even dirtier gas from the US
I don’t understand. There’s no net increase or decrease of atmospheric carbon in the scenario you describe
Phosphor leds are a little better. the "warm filament" style and the white leds that get used for projectors and grow lights are both a little better than single frequency LED lights.

Multi element LED banks are good if distant and diffused; but direct lighting from multiple points like that produces fun multiple colored shadows and that is exhausting for close eyeball work, I find. Not good for photography either.

prohibiting incandescent bulbs made less sense than prohibiting alcohol
We moved into a house during COVID and it came with a stove - it was significantly cheaper to run the stove than our gas boiler - £3 roughly for an evening compared to probably £12-15 to heat with the boiler. Across 3-4 months of winter that's an enormous saving
> Another is that these people are pretty good at starting shit storms trying to ruin your reputation if you don't comply with their unreasonable demands.

If you go on social media and offer your well-thought-out opinions about some controversial subject, you are very likely to get large number of people sending you offensive messages, arguing with you objectionably, trying to start pile-ons, attempting to dox you, etc.

Is the correct response to announce that "your participation in political discussion for free has become unsustainable", and that you need to be paid by all the people who find your comments interesting?
"Beyond Devs: GitLab Enterprise Agile Planning add-on for all roles"

Cool. I would rather have resource consumption reduced though.
I don’t understand why you’re being downvoted.

Your point is absolutely correct and as far as I can tell you pointed it out genuinely, not facetiously.
Edit: read other later posts here: didn’t know about the bacteria part. Learned something today!

This is absolutely not my area of expertise but intuitively there are two categories of energy sources: one which releases co2 (or other climate change impacting gases) and one which doesn’t. Wood, oil, gas, coal falls into the former. It’s just a question of time as you say until the loop closes. Solar, wind, thermal, etc would fall into the latter as far as I can tell.
Its old source of funding. And it was much more complex[0] than that.

seL4 is now a healthy non-profit, seL4 foundation[1].

0. https://microkerneldude.org/2022/02/17/a-story-of-betrayal-c...

1. https://microkerneldude.org/2022/03/22/ts-in-2022-were-back/
The article immediately, within the 2nd sentence, shows how little the author knows what they're talking about. Who in their right mind thinks monetary policies could be considered "anarchist"?

More on topic, it seems to me that having money expire would only further benefit the class who does nothing but move money around.
I loved this when he posted it.

Taking this a step further, and being facetious, I'm thinking of starting my own network! It's all me, all the time. Sometimes I'll be a nature show, sometimes I'll be in a spy movie, sometimes I'll have the guys from Mystery Science Theater 3000 cracking jokes at how dumb I am. Can't be that hard to do what this guy did, only in twenty-four different genres, one for each hour of the day. Turn it on, let it play.

I think it would be fun. Having said that, can you imagine somebody with mental illness, perhaps that makes them paranoid, having an AI interweave them into a spy thriller or murder mystery?

People already took computers too seriously before ChatGPT and the like. Having some official-sounding narrator, somebody you know from previous appearances, helping you out in your fantasy life?

As much fun as this is going to be, it also bothers me quite a bit.
Overwhelming majority of people don't buy 10$ coffee. They just don't do it.
Unfortunately, a system can be individually unsustainable while being globally sustainable.

That is, maintainer burnout rate can be high, but a continuous influx of new maintainers could compensate.

In fact, a lot of industries work like that, and numerous examples regularly appear on HN. Video game companies are notoriously full of super bright young developers, which are squeezed until burnout, just to be replaced by a new ones.

As for the compensation bit, although I agree with the principle, I tend to disagree that it would solve the problem as a whole. Sure, some maintainers would be more willing to spend time on their OSS projects if they were paid, some might even quit their job and work full time on their OSS. But my personal experience is that money is but a short term replacement for passion. Once you reach the point where you're not willingly working on a project, additional money can give you a boost of motivation, but ultimately you will tend to procrastinate to work on it, until you just won't be able to force yourself to touch it.
Flatkill is full of misinformation or no longer true information. There're many posts debunking most of their points [1]. Some parts were true a few years ago but aren't anymore.

Edit: They removed many of their examples at some point, so it's no longer as bad of an article.

For example if VSCode wouldn't have direct access to the file system, it would be unuseable since it doesn't support portals to ask the user to grant it access to specific folders (by selecting them through the file picker).

In the process of packaging an app for flathub, the packager has to provide some reason for why for example full file system access is necessary. The discussion to add or remove permissions are always open [2].

[1] https://theevilskeleton.gitlab.io/2021/02/11/response-to-fla...

[2] https://github.com/flathub/net.lutris.Lutris/issues/229
Hopefully not, really looking to the competition!
Ha, good idea. Something like this, right?: https://www.richelieu.com/us/en/category/closet-and-storage/...

Not sure how much it costs, but it doesn't look difficult to make. There might be patents though.
John Clauser won a Nobel Prize. Then he started denying climate change
I have angered so many frontend devs by touting this for years.
It amazes me how common sense like this is instantly attacked and belitteled. Unless you create a user-interface UI in a webpage (a complicated frontend state), I think its way more reasonable to just use html/css with small sprinkles of js to open/close menues and modals. It loads fast, its less code so its easier to maintain. It does not require a complicated build step that instantly becomes deprecated once its deployed. Heck, its even greener, it requires less CPU power to build and render.
There needs to be a legal respponsibility of users of AI. AI isn't responsible, those acting with the aid of AI are.
Fair, and in other comments on this subject I’ve complained that we don’t have good “language” for discussing things like blogs vs marketing sites vs JS-heavy sites vs actual web apps. More often than not people are taking past each other in the pro/anti-JS context with each person thinking of a different example.

I completely agree that your blog probably doesn’t need to require JS and might even be worth some of these fallbacks if you do want to enhance it but a blog is tiny testing space compared to any “web app”. Also even if your user-facing aspect of the blog can handle noscript your backend admin/editor is going to require JS in most cases.

Yes, yes, static site generators are great but let’s not kid ourselves and pretend they are suitable for most people. Hell, I used SSG for years before deciding I just wanted a web admin UI to edit/write in for my blog. And you can even pair the two together (JS-based admin that generates static frontend files for readers).

Bottom line if any part of your website/app requires JS then it’s a waste of time to try implement fallbacks. At a previous company I dealt with this, the core of our business was a website that needed JS to function but I had one dev who constantly wanted to have fallbacks on our less JS-heavy pages. A user using noscript would not be able to do the most important things since there was literally no conceivable way to have a noscript fallback (show me the fallback for drawing polygons on a map without JS, I’ll eat my hat). Being able to create calendar items in our system might be possible without JS (with a terrible UX) but good luck with the UI to assign people to the calendar entry. It just wasn’t worth the effort and QA time to support both.
> Is the correct response to announce that "your participation in political discussion for free has become unsustainable", and that you need to be paid by all the people who find your comments interesting?

Why are you asking me this? I'm not the author of that text.
My take on this article can be found here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38302098
Germany could have cheap own energy, but usually any new infrastructure or whatever attracts huge opposition.
Shoe recs? My Feiyues are crucial to me but they look kinda junky.
Green power is working like a business of child of rich parent. The child may do the business, but in case of problem, then can alway ask his daddy(fossil fuel) to help. There is no sence to analize portugail or sweden seprarately, because they are a part of EU energy system and can infinitely get energy in case of lack of wind or solar.

For e.g. in germany 60% of energy is produced from renewable source, but there are weeks when it is only 10%. So you have to have coal or gas station to compensate it
What an easy way to get a free coffee! :D
Sure but it makes it a lot harder to figure out how much someone "deserves" for writing a FOSS project.
Don't know of many unsustainable endeavors that last for over 30 years with no sign of stopping
Electric vehicles just don't scale up. Its just the nature of batteries, and really only way to overcome it is to have electrified network - trams, rail.

The bottom line for using batteries is simple and unavoidable (with current infrastructure)

The longer the travel distance the more bateries you need. The heavier cargo the more batteries you need. And the longer it takes to charge them. Batteries dont decrease in weight like diesel as journey progresses.

It seems that the maximum we can take EV cargo is small local delivery trucks for inner cities.

And Tesla itself is providing evidence for it. They have a video of Semi journey, where its repetitively overtaken by normal truck (they drive slower to save battery), their commercial partner use case is crisps/chips ie. carrying 99% air with 1% potatoes (semi serious joke).

So I wouldnt trust any EV truck company. And any creative solutions to the 'battery scaling problem' by changing the infrastructure seems to be pointless as you instead could just build more rail - a far superior cargo solution.
What if, and hear me out, all that effort went into MV2?
...that creases your clothes?

And demoed with hanging a t-shirt, just fold it.

All but the cheapest (single piece moulded plastic) coat hangers have hooks that swivel, so it could hang at an angle solving this anyway. There are also products on the market that collapse down vertically, so you have multiple items on one hook, which as long as it also swivels solves this problem too and gives much more capacity. The folding design puts creases in, and takes twice as much space horizontally - if you have the outward space problem you're probably short of that too.

But it's a nice video of designing and prototyping and creating something, I might subscribe/watch some more of her stuff even though I think this particular solution (and especially as a kickstarted product) is silly.
> when you knew you couldn't KYC

What? Did you actually read what you replied to?
I have something like this it’s very nice at the warmest setting but only equal to maybe 25w incandescent. https://www.amazon.com/ONLSITY-Pendant-Lights-Outdoor-Contro... I think the defused cover on these lights make them exceptional source of light.

For regular bulbs I use Energetic Edison style bulb
https://www.amazon.com/Equivalent-Filament-Daylight-Non-Dimm...
Navigating around in your shell
I think this is the exact reason why government should intervene - the market solution doesn’t work. Unfortunately so many government policies are working to make housing scarce and creating the problem in the first place.
I'm somewhat flattered that you think Communick is a "competing provider" to Signal. Or anything, really. Maybe I will add that to the "testimonials" section of the website along with other nice things I get to hear from my 8 customers.

Whether Communick exists or not, even if I close it down next week (because if we are being honest it is nothing but a money pit which I keep running out of spite and stubbornness, and unlike Signal I'm not panhandling for donations) my criticism of centralized messaging platforms would still stand: whether it's Signal, or WhatsApp, or FaceTime or Telegram... we should not be supporting any platform that centralizes all communications in one single place, no matter how "well intentioned" or even how "provably secure" it is.
It's Simone Giertz! Internet famous for making useless machines and shitty robots, has now apparently pivoted to making more useful things.

It doesn't solve a problem I have, and I worry that they might break under heavier clothes, but it's a cool and surprisingly simple idea, and probably perfect for people with tiny houses. Which is probably a growing demographic.
> She definitely worked on other projects in that time.

If you didn't recognize the name, you are in for a treat… She filmed a lot of those and her collaboration with other makers — her videos with Laura Kampf are a breath of fresh air.
Ditto, been running Proxmox 15+ years and it's been rock solid.

The only thing I miss is the kind of automatic deployment and network layers that Kubernetes has.
They lose $20k per truck but will make it up on volume!

Seriously what is the origins of the this joke?

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2007/11/we-apos...
more and more, both drink from the same tap.
Me too and I don't really understand why. On Windows, pressing F12 to open Dev Tools takes a good five seconds in Edge but takes fractions of a second in Firefox. And page renders feel faster, although apparently they actually aren't in controlled experiments.

Maybe one of the extensions I typically use in both works differently in Firefox.
How do you expect to prevent deforestation if there is no economic value to keeping the forests? People, in general, don't object to deforestation because it's 'productive' - it's building things, making jobs, making money. If deforestation was destroying a valuable resource that provides heat and energy for your community, you would absolutely not allow it, and definitely not support it.
Just wanna note that having ADHD doesn’t mean you suffer from all of these things.

> Tasks with no clear “done criteria”, non-linear steps, or undefined processes will be the worst.

This was a major revelation for me. Even now in my 30s, I have to write out my own “acceptance criteria” for vague and ambiguous objectives at work to make sure I accomplish it, else it gets forever delayed in favor of smaller, more discrete tasks.
What is the minimum thing that counts as a social interaction, I wonder? Saying hello? Small talk? Coffee? Lunch?
ugh... the general vibe of "X is ready for production, we will be delivering next year"... being said every year for 6 years now?
Thing is, when I have 3 or 4 Electron apps open, they are still not using 100% "real" memory - it's all compressed if the need arises. What other apps that you use, use Electron?
We are addressing the CRDT downsides mentioned in the article at Loro:

- Ever-growing state. This is no longer an issue. With OT-like CRDTs, you can discard unnecessary historical data at any time. This is theoretically feasible, and we are moving towards this goal.
- Complex implementation. The complexity is internal within the package, and it's written in Rust, making it universally applicable.
- Opaque state. We aim to expose these internal states through improved DevTools, making them easier to control and observe. This is one of the essential steps in enhancing our DX.

You can visit our blog to learn more: https://www.loro.dev/blog/loro-now-open-source
Disagree.

If this could be created without using recordings of his voice to train the model, then sure. I agree a "sound-alike" like that is fair game.

But since actual recordings of his voice were used in order to train the model to recreate the sound, inflection, cadence, etc...it should be required to get authorization to use those recordings for this purpose.
She also underwent radiation treatment because parts were around her optical nerve.
Thank you for sharing that, I can relate to that.

I did really well until Covid hit and now I feel like all my progress has been reset. It is just so much harder when you know it is something you have to maintain all your live or you will lose it instead of something you can just solve once and for all.

Plus, I have the paradoxical form for social anxiety where I am mostly nervous around close friends and the like while I don't really care about presenting to total strangers. So I can easily be read as cold and arrogant because the anxiety is less obvious. Plus maintaining relationships isn't exactly my strength.
No, fungi evolved that can digest lignin now ;).

On a less facetious note, Solar needs time to renew the energy it made the day before as well. Time scale is very important to questions of renewables, and people have been sustainably burning wood for a long time. Unsustainably too, but I would bet that’s not the case here if it’s being included in a census of sustainable sources.
I'm 99% sure that they won't come to collect my trusty Pixel 3a any time soon :)
>real-time makes a system slower.

linux-rt's PREEMPT_RT has a negligible impact. It is there, but it is negligible. It does, however, enable a lot of use cases where Linux fails otherwise, such as pro audio.

In modern usage, it even helps reduce input jitter with videogames and enable lower latency videoconference.

I am hopeful most distributions will turn it on by default, as it benefits most users, and causes negligible impact on throughput-centric workloads.
RCS supports read status, emoji reactions, etc. I use Beeper on Android to have support Messages group chats, and in my experience it's functionally the same as group chats over rcs.
Television Signal Search Map
There is shared consensus: https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/available-runtimes.html
You're probably thinking about bus arbiters in 4.), which are generally fast but have no bounded settling time.