skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Or offer to buy them a real nice new coffee table
I used the exact same strategy with opening my extra backup parachute and it said I forgot to pack my backup, so I died.
I still have plenty USB-A/B devices and I'd rather not buy a new cable for each of them.

Ain't broke, don't fix it. They will fade away eventually.
You have a technically valid viewpoint, its just utterly impractical if you carry it to its logical conclusion.

If something that can be used for good can also be used for nefarious purposes, you claim that some entity should exert a modicum of control over that thing to prevent it from being used for nefarious purposes.

Now think about all the things in peoples day to day life that can be used for good, but also can be used for nefarious purposes, and see if you would be ok with your argument being applied for those.
This is all just playing out the way Roko's Basilisk intends it.

You have a board that wants to keep things safe and harness the power of AGI for all of humanity. This would be slower and likely restrict its freedom.

You have a commercial element whose interest aligns with the basilisk, to get things out there quickly.

The basilisk merely exploits the enthusiasm of that latter element to get itself online quicker. It doesn't care about whether OpenAI and its staff succeed. The idea that OpenAI needs to take advantage of its current lead is enough, every other AI company is also going to be less safety-aligned going forward, because they need to compete.

The thought of being at the forefront of AI and dropping the ball incentivizes the players to the basilisk's will.
I was initially quite keen on Julia but this critique rather put me off: https://yuri.is/not-julia/ and I've not seen a rebuttal.
There was a series of brawls in some of the outdoor pools this summer, which together with the eternal fear of immigrants caused a media frenzy. (Berlin's pools where suddenly national news)
This is probably the reaction to those events.
I much rather he start a different venture.
> yes, connectors got much better in the past decades

Really? How is e.g. the HDMI connectors "better" than the VGA connectors? VGA connectors seems far more robust to me. Same with d-sub mouse connectors.

I guess the signal rating is better now but the old ones didn't need high frequency capabilities.
They have their own assistant as well. It's on top of poe.

It's quite bad now but for someone like Adam with dataset like quora, he likely has bigger plans.
To be honest, I haven't seen broken type-c cable yet. But I saw damaged USB A cables due to wrong insertion side. Someone just inserted a cable with a huge force to a port.
An AI/ML accuracy tale
Because any defense of being able to orchestrate a professional coup and do your other work with the same zeal and focus as you did before fomenting rebellion I take as seriously as people who tell me they can multitask effectively.

It's just not possible. We're limited in how much energy we can bring to daily work, that's a fact. If your brain is occupied both with dreams of king-making and your regular duties at the job, your mental bandwidth is compromised.
.@sama: i love the openai team so much
Apparently a huge number of staff members threatened to quit unless the board resigned.
> A new cosmo_dlopen() function is now provided that's good enough to load nontrivial dynamic libraries on all platforms except OpenBSD.

Read my mind...
Coding has always been easy and fun for me. I taught myself assembler programming when I was 11 on a ZX-Spectrum and have been coding ever since. Professionally (30+ years) and for fun. I know coding is super hard for most people but for some reason it just fits my brain. Perhaps you need the right brain structure to find coding easy? Not sure …
I imagine if you give it long enough and try to uphold an expectation of "knowing/controlling what runs on your computer(s)" you will gradually gain a serious dislike of proprietary software and come to understand why people feel that capitalism and open source do not get along (and never will). The whole field of proprietary commercial software is VERY coercive.

Your ability to truly control what runs on your machine decreases every day. Want to keep being able to talk with your friends and family? Better update the respective app, even though it removed one of the key features you relied on or enjoyed. Oh hey, now another feature you really liked is subscription-only! No going back, either, once you updated you're locked into that functionality forever.

Oh yeah, if you don't update automatically, you'll just constantly be harassed by manipulative dialog boxes that say never let you actually say "no", your choices are "yes I submit" or "maybe I'll give in to your demands later". All these coercive features are strictly driven by exactly one thing: profit. That is the absolute defining factor of all coercive functionality in modern software.

The primary driver of open source software is providing something useful to empower people and improve their lives (even in a trivial sense like some inconsequential mini-game or utility only the author cares about).

The primary driver of proprietary software is profit. Actual benefit to humans is literally secondary -- if businesses could ship software that is made with zero lines of code and provides zero benefit to anyone, but people still paid $100 for it? They'd absolutely ship that without hesitation!

Really, I can talk about this dichotomy all day, because I've been recognizing this extreme contrast increasingly every day for years as I became more and more disillusioned by the increasing hostility I've experienced from the OSes and software I thought were trying to empower me but truly only care about extracting money from me (with usefulness seeming like a side effect begrudgingly fulfilled).
The game needs a way for players to unanimously vote an answer as being BS.
I don’t know, I only bother to finish projects for work. With personal projects, it always ends up following the 20/80 rule — 20% of the code produces 80% of the value. The remaining 80% of code is largely uninteresting busywork and just isn’t worth the effort for a pet project.

But it’s definitely worth implementing the core concepts in total, both for whatever goal and your own learning. The rest just needs a working mental model, but actually implementing is a waste

As an aside, I’ve found this also holds true for most games, and stopped bothering to finish them (you can usually understand most games in total very quickly, largely because their systems are so shallow)
You don’t want planes breaking ground in Antarctica.

This would generally be very bad news.
reach a truce where the board would resign and he and Brockman would return

That's a funny use of the word truce.
> I believe that people don’t understand that Data Scientists are full stack engineers.

What do you mean by "full stack"? I'm sure there's a spectrum of ability, but frankly where I'm from, "Data Scientist" refers to someone who can use pandas and scikit-learn. Probably from inside a Jupyter notebook.
All of the information AI regurgitates is either already available online as part of its corpus (and therefore the AI plays no particular role in access to that information), or completely made up (which is likely to kill more terrorists than anyone else!)

Reiterating other comments, terrorists can't make bioweapons because they lack the facilities and prerequisites, not because they're incompetent.
there are rumors that the latest gen drones in ukraine use crude embedded vision ai to increase terminal accuracy. launch and iterate, this will only get more lethal.
Do you have a link to one please?
"What you call climate change, is what most people call living."

Tradition does not beget complacency, nor does it preclude reflection. I'm also eating bacon and eggs for breakfast, just the vegan versions, which are really good these days.
> ...people who still have a use for type A to buy a $5 adapter

I have literally tens of devices with usb A to usb B/mini/micro etc. cables, and only a few that have usb C, and even most of those came with a usb A -> usb C cable.

USB A is far from dead and should stay... I don't want to live in an "apple-like world", where you need an adapter for everything that should be included directly in the first place (lika an USB A port!!). And I already have to buy a serial (rs232) adapter, because they removed it for no real reason.
I personally just watch the ads, but I understand why one would not want to subscribe to the service even if it is reasonably priced. It is not the sticker cost, but the additional cost of the cognitive load that comes with a subscription. Having to remember yet another service that needs to be paid for, that needs to be cancelled when you don't want it anymore, that needs to be included in budgeting, etc. occupies a lot of mind space for the lifetime of the service.

An ad blocker can be created and then forgotten about.
Otoh Ilya wasn't a main contributor for GPT-4 as per the list of contributions. gdb was.
We could just use yellow LEDs. They have almost the same wavelength as low pressure sodium lamps (585 nm versus 589 nm).
Mini is quite fine I thing you are mixing it up with micro.
I dont think that this would be any cheaper, (maybe excluding yt music would cost them little less? idk) but this price is mostly what they think removing ads is worth and rest is like a free bonus.

In my country yt premium costs almost like Spotify premium and for me it doesn't bring enough value in comparison
But they have the key problem of all established companies: they built the infrastructure for what is now the wrong thing.

This means to do the right thing at Google would require fighting battles on all sorts of fronts as established mini empires within attempt to latch on to this new perceived opportunity to expand.
I bumped a cyclist while I was edging out into a blind intersection (one of those that gets parked up all alongside it) because I was looking one way and he raced in front of me from the other. Like, neither of us really did anything wrong, but he was nearly severely injured and I nearly went to prison. Cars are dumb.
People keep trying to make this about wokeness gone mad, but it was Ilya,the white guy most involved in their biggest technological innovations, that instigated all this.

Basically, it’s a nonprofit organization, and so they picked people who are professionally on the boards of nonprofit organizations and think about these matters in terms of ideology rather than tawdry profits.

Then everybody is shocked when they fire the CEO for caring more about profit than the ideologies they have based their careers around.

The problem isn’t that they were women. The problem is Sam tried to cosplay OpenAI as a nonprofit organization trying to do good in the world rather than just make money, and was in for a shock when it turned out the board members actually took that seriously.
Mars just added us to close friends :)
Linux Foundation is a US nonprofit[0], maybe that's what they're getting at? /shrug

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Foundation
In my opinion...

If you want to be the titan of an industry and do things that put you at the center of media attention, you have to expect comments of this kind and not be surprised when they happen. Whether you are a man, a woman or anybody else.

If you don't expect "not very nice" or ambivalent reactions from people, you are an amateur and you shouldn't be in the board of such a prominent company.
Not just more panels but more wiring to take care of. And more square meters of panel to clean.
They did, that's the problem
So basically you agree with what I was saying.

> What principle can you use to decide how precise it should be?

It is not up to me or anyone else to decide. Our subjective definitions and concepts of the model are irrelevant. How the brain works is a result of our genetic structure. We don't have a choice.
I am not giving into Google s coercion. Why are you?
Thanks for clarifying, I didn't want to nitpick but my curiosity always gets the best of me. Sometimes it works out :)
Motif today isn't that bad compared to the bloat of GTK4. Today's '486' in the era of Pentium 3's would be an Atom netbook. EMWM (enhanced MWM) + XFile flies. I quickly hacked NNTP auth support through some quick code and an Xresources value for NCSA Mosaic. Yes, that one.

Also, you get XFT and UTF-8 support thru fontconfig and XFT on every Motif based software. Far from the propietary Motif of 1996...

Compare it to Gnome and dconf...
Barack Obama: "For elevator music, AI is going to work fine, but Bob Dylan?"
So you end up learning even less from that process than by using a CLI.

As long as you have this behavior for non-critical code it's just a little sad because you are delegating something you could easily have learnt. For hype sake I guess.

But if you do use this technique in a work related context you are just going to produce average code that you won't be able to debug when something break...
Why then has no one come close to replicating GPT-4 after 8 months of it being around?
Like I said in my last comment, if you're thinking about female-only spaces only in terms of how women can forcibly stop men from entering, then you're looking at this from the perspective of male entitlement instead of focusing on women's needs. How about instead, the males just respect women's spaces, and stop trying to convert every female-only space into a mixed-sex space? Every time a so-called "trans woman" disrespects the space and boundaries of women for his own selfish pleasures, he's adding to this problem. It really shows how little these men actually understand and empathise with women, when they're exhibiting this dominance behaviour.

Also, some female-only spaces can be and are enforced by authorities with the resources to do so, for example prisons. It is well understood by most people that prisons need to be separated by sex for the safety and dignity of female inmates. The problem is that in some places, women's prisons have been incarcerating men who say they have a "female gender identity" in there too. There have been numerous cases of these men raping, sexually assaulting and even impregnating the women they have been imprisoned with. It is appalling and shows exactly why women need single-sex spaces away from these predators.

> Also, frankly banning fathers from protecting their daughters in bathrooms and changing their diapers is discriminatory. There's nothing predatory about a dad changing his infants diaper and it's utterly disgusting to portray it as such. This is precisely the gender discrimination we should be fighting against as a civilized society.

No, what is needed in this case are baby changing facilities in male and gender-neutral spaces. Not carte blanche access to female-only spaces by men.

Also please actually read my comments before responding. In no way did I say or even imply that a father changing his child's nappy is predatory. I believe it's a good thing when fathers are more involved in child care than is traditionally the case. You are railing against an argument you invented inside your own mind.
Is Liquidrom nudist now? I used to go there when i lived in Berlin in 2010 and it was absolutely not nudist.
The problem is that people need to know the algorithm you're asking them to implement, which biases it towards memorization.

When you tell them how the algorithm works, it feels like you are not testing anything except syntax.

If you let people look it up, it feels like you aren't testing anything except their research skills.

It is difficult to have a test in a vacuum. It would probably be better to have a test with multiple steps.

Exercise 1:

a) Research the topic bubble sort. Explain what bubble sort does and write some notes or pseudo code that will help you implement it. Once you are done, we will disable internet access and close your browser.

b) Write a working bubble sort in COMPANY LANGUAGE.

c) Modify the bubble sort so that it can sort by multiple columns.

The first tests your research skills, the second your syntax skills and the third your ability to deal with changing requirements and implement novel functionality without research.
yes but what i’m saying is the knife analogy weakens this position imo )) if it’s bullshit (which we agree)i personally find such analogies serve to support the nullshit narrative instead of calling bs on it ). that’s all). i do agree you and i agree though penultimately
Everyone wants their own, I guess.
Do you have a link to one of these talks?
You can when the car is in neutral (hopefully some rev limiter is in place to prevent you from destroying the engine in a relatively short amount of time).
Thats a nice touch, I love when people put some soul/ghost back in the machine a little.
Focus on the big picture - what are we actually trying to achieve.
And some luck is needed really.
Well, we'll see how big the moat really is. That's what I find most interesting in this.
The thief has your box of savings and are walking away. You recognise the thief, and can give the police its name. You happen to have a gun. Are you morraly permitted to commit violence to stop the thief? And how does this violence compare to the violence you can commit to the vage thief?
Which far larger problems? A synthetic virus could kill a large fraction of humanity.
Her background looks pretty solid to me given that AI is a recent field:

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=NNnQg0MAAAAJ&hl=en

https://futureshub.anu.edu.au/experts/helen-toner

And she setup the Center for Security and Emerging Technology at Georgetown so also has some degree of executive experience.
With Linux/BSD you have a fun issue with X. If you used the XV overlayed video output, you got no screenshot except for a blue one. Both with video files and screenshots on TVTime. Some setting allowed it, I can't remember.
I find it amazing what science can do nowadays. Makes you wonder where we're going to be in one hundred years from now!
Ever seen Skint? That shit is so fucking dark
What’s the source on this?
They used SDL almost as an display buffer output. Oh, and for easy multimedia.
Are you really saying Google can't spend $60m or much more to compete? Again if it is so easy as spending money on compute Amazon and Google would have just spent the money by now and Bard would be as good as Chat GPT, but for most things it is not even as good as Chat GPT 3.5.
Yellow LEDs have almost the same wavelength as low-pressure sodium lamps.
I think the boundary is somewhat fluid. Haven't seen actual inappropriate behaviour in a spa yet (and I think especially saunas are mostly spurring the imagination of people who never visited one: you're usually too exhausted from the heat and/or humidity to even want to do anything)

However it's clearly a place for couples to go to and especially in the actual bathing area (i.e. not the saunas), you can whitness a lot of "public displays of affection".

Whether this this upsets you or not, is something that everyone has to decide for themselves I guess.
Support from others.

It isn't the difficulties of the task, the working time of the task, or the working pressure of the task.

It is the complete lack of support from Senior Management, Direct Management or colleagues

People quit or burn out not because of they dont like the job, it is either because of pay or management. And in many cases both.

And from my long years of working life, 99% of manager dont have a clue how to manage. Most are only good at delivering ( at the expenses of others ).
> laboratory mice are often in contact with plastics that they chew on. So it's highly unlikely that ingesting plastics has any effect on mouse models of Parkinson's as this would have been noted decades ago

Doesn't it only mean there were no control group? Just like when they found out that mice suddenly started dying less when they raised lab temp a bit.
> That the evidence used to justify the invasion of Iraq was fabricated was blatantly obvious at the time and foreign heads of state's statements on it were based more on diplomacy than credibility.

It seemed obvious to me at the time when I watched a clip of the discussion in the House of Commons, but in retrospect what I thought was a weakness of the government position shouldn't have been seen that way, as (I learned from Johnson violating it) the standard for all statements in the House to be true.

Otherwise, I think I agree with what you say.
Communal bath are wonderful. Iceland has a really nice culture of it (and their baths are nice and warm too, thanks to geothermal energy..)
Because of outstanding execution of OpenAI technical folks. An execution that has nothing to do with Altman. Similarly Mistral 7B model has much better performances than others. There is some smart engineering plus finding the magical parameters that produce great results. Moreover, they have a lot of training power. Unfortunately here the biggest competitor would be a company that lost its way a lot of time ago: Google. So OpenAI look magical (while it is using mostly research produced by Google).
“A tiny bit misleading”

This is Sky News’ bread and butter.
It will buy you nearly a ton of wheat.
Let's say someone figures out alignment. We develop models that when plugged into the original ones either in the training as extra stages or as a filter that runs on top. What prevents anyone from just building the same architecture and leaving any alignment parts out Practically invalidating whatever time was spent on it.
We also moved to NL and we love it, even though yeah there are surprisingly still lots of cars here. It's definitely the case that walking/biking has a hugely good effect on individuals and society. Just seeing people on the street, congregating, going from dinner to after dinner drinks, everything is just more human.
FYI your original post sounded like you were advocating shooting purse snatchers or shoplifters in the back as they ran away with the goods.

Home invasion is quite a bit different from property theft.
For those purely interested in the algorithm part of the repo, this seems to be it:

```
/// Implementation for converting an image to ASCII art.
impl ToAsciiArt for ImageConverter {
fn to_ascii_art(&self, options: Option<AsciiOptions>) -> String {
let options = options.unwrap_or_default();

let target_width = options.width;
let target_height = options.height;

let width_ratio = self.image.width() as f32 / target_width as f32;
let height_ratio = self.image.height() as f32 / target_height as f32;

let mut ascii_art = String::with_capacity((target_width * target_height) as usize);

for y in 0..target_height {
for x in 0..target_width {
let start_x = (x as f32 * width_ratio) as u32;
let start_y = (y as f32 * height_ratio) as u32;

let mut total_r = 0;
let mut total_g = 0;
let mut total_b = 0;

for dy in 0..height_ratio as u32 {
for dx in 0..width_ratio as u32 {
let pixel = self.image.get_pixel(start_x + dx, start_y + dy);
let channels = pixel.channels();
total_r += channels[0] as u32;
total_g += channels[1] as u32;
total_b += channels[2] as u32;
}
}

let count = (width_ratio * height_ratio) as u32;
let avg_r = (total_r / count) as u8;
let avg_g = (total_g / count) as u8;
let avg_b = (total_b / count) as u8;

let luminance = (0.2126 * avg_r as f32 + 0.7152 * avg_g as f32 + 0.0722 * avg_b as f32) as u8;
let character = match luminance {
0..=31 => '#',
32..=63 => '@',
64..=95 => '8',
96..=127 => '&',
128..=159 => 'o',
160..=191 => ':',
192..=223 => '*',
224..=255 => '.',
};

ascii_art.push(character);
}
ascii_art.push('\n');
}

ascii_art
}

}
```
Reminds me of the story of Chinggis Khan's burial:

"It's also said that after the Khan was laid to rest in his unmarked grave, a thousand horsemen trampled over the area to obscure the grave's exact location. Afterward, those horsemen were killed. And then the soldiers who had killed the horsemen were also killed, all to keep the grave's location secret."
You can remove videos from your YouTube history and then they won't influence the recommendations you get.
Go Web Server for Remotely Powering on a Desktop Computer with a Raspberry Pi