skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://archive.ph/NqEom
These types of RTSs are way less "arcadey" than Warcraft 3 or Starcraft, so I don't think supporting custom games is on the devs radar.

What you're usually after in these games are huge battles on massive worlds with thousands of explosions leaving craters and debris everywhere.
I have not done any kind of statistical analysis on the comments but I’ve been reading pretty much every thread here on HN and while there are anti-Altman comments I’ve just seen so many pro-Altman, “the board is full of Morons”, “MS is big mad”, etc comments that were depressing to read from a crowd of people I largely respect (not the individuals posting necessarily, but the community is a whole). That coupled with people willing to defend the for-profit motives as a bad reason for ousting Altman (which, yes they are just rumors) and the investors hawking them was sad to see.
Are you running mistral-7B or mistral-7B-instruct?
Aunt, adult, pajamas: Why can't we agree how to pronounce common words? (2015)
> Much easier to google / llm for the right ffmpeg arguments

hahahahha
"a few dollars"
They are also categorized as "communication services" in most financial benchmarks, instead of software, just like META. Funnily enough, combined with META they represent 30% of this sector. There is definitely something to argue about.

My point being, their capital structure is focused around the IP they own which is mostly tech stuff rather than ad stuff. When they don't build the stack themselves they acquire it, not merely purchase products, like some tv/radio network would do to create content and broadcast it. On the other hand when they spend on improving their ad monetization it's an expense, not an investment, which to me kind of proves my point.
If either I or someone else benefits from it. That's it!

Evaluating it based on the money it makes is a recipe for disappointment.

Seeing a PR is always nice. That tells me someone is finding a use for it and is invested enough to help make it better.

I quickly abandon something if I have no use for it. Contributors will tell me if I should keep something around
I don't know what you can do for immediate action, but usually Google does reverse their domain safety status quickly after the offending content is removed. 72 hours might be enough for this to go away.
TDD was later given the name Behavior Driven Development (before being usurped by the likes of Cucumber, Gerkhin) in an attempt to avoid this confusion. TDD advocates that you test that the client library does what its public interface claims it does – its behavior, not how it is implemented under the hood. The wire protocol is almost irrelevant. The tests should hold true even when the wire protocol is replaced with another protocol.
> That would effectively exit Microsoft from the LLM race

I don't see why. As I understand it, a significant percentage of Microsoft's investment went into the hardware they're providing. It's not like that hardware and associated infrastructure are going to disappear if they kick OpenAI off it. They can rent it to someone else. Heck, given the tight GPU supply situation, they might even be able to sell it at a profit.
It's unhinged because one could make slippery slope arguments about any technology killing millions of people.

In the cold war era, the government didn't even want cryptography to become generally available. I mean, what if Soviet spies use it to communicate with each other and the government can't decode what they're saying?

Legislators who are worried about technology killing people ought to focus their efforts on the technologies that we actually know kill people, like guns and cigarettes. (Oh but, those industries are donating money to the politicians, so they conveniently don't care much.)
“French research is underfunded since decades” is a French-ism,
just so you know. Normally native English speakers would say “French research has been underfunded for decades”.
They cut the power to take out surveillance cameras and lights so they could steal a modem.
> I already explained elsewhere in this comment thread why.

Your explanation seemed to be predicated on the idea that you would have to stick to the terms of your own licence. This isn't true. A license only describes what other people can do. As the copyright holder, you can do whatever you want. For instance, you can offer a dual license, or offer different licenses to different people. An FSL-GPL is perfectly feasible.

> But some of these are depending on the goodwill of a future actor.

The FSL also depends on this. Someone releasing FSL code could easily switch to a different license at some point in the same way that someone who was releasing their past source code could decide to stop doing so. This would result in an almost identical situation in practice. The FSL still offers no difference from just releasing the source voluntarily, because it is just you agreeing to release the source voluntarily.
It's an industry/field of study that a small group of people with a lot of money think would be neat if it existed and they could get paid for, so they willed it into existence.

It has about as much real world applicability as those people who charge money for their classes on how to trade crypto. Or maybe "how to make your own cryptocurrency".

Not only does current AI not have that ability, it's not clear that AI with relevant capabilities will ever be created.

IMO it's born out of a generation having grown up on "Ghost in the Shell" imagining that if an intelligence exists and is running on silicon, it can magically hack and exist inside every connected device on earth. But "we can't prove that won't happen".
That prevents you from trading with certain people.

Example: I want to sell my labor to B for a salary, but due to corporate ownership being banned I am not allowed to. If you just limit the size of corporations, that will still happen when B has grown a bit and is unable to hire more people due to having hit the cap.

What if we transfer the company to some other entity? Well, I want to sell my labor to B, not to that new entity. Maybe I'm friends with B, or maybe I believe in B's vision, maybe B is giving me joint ownership of the corporation, or some other reason, doesn't matter why it still is a legal limitation.
Pretty much, I'd say we're way past the fleecing and poop flinging at this point and well into persistence hunting, maybe even control of fire?
If they intended to protect humanity this was a misfire.

OpenAI is one of many AI companies. A board coup which sacrifices one company's value due to a few individuals' perception of the common good is reckless and speaks to their delusions of grandeur.

Removing one individual from one company in a competitive industry is not a broad enough stroke if the threat to humanity truly exists.

Regulators across nations would need to firewall this threat on a macro level across all AI companies, not just internally at OpenAI.

If an AI threat to humanity is even actionable today. That's a heavy decision for elected representatives, not corporate boards.
i like cursive italics—they make me feel fancy. i’ve been using dank mono for a bit now and have been enjoying it.

going to give this a try!
> Speaking of disingenuous, every time the sentry people come in here to talk it's always strawmen.

Good that I'm not the only one who feels that way. Every comment by Sentry people I've read here so far was basically a mix of straw man, word lawyering ("We didn't say this. We said something that means the same to anyone who doesn't actively try to think of some fringe interpretation, but OBVIOUSLY that means you misquoted us. How unfair.") and aggressive "you are against us! Meanie!"

Or in other words, to use their quote back on them: If you are convinced your license is the best thing since sliced bread, there is probably little we can do to disavow you of that notion.
Do employers and hiring personnel Google people? Look at their social media accounts? Sometimes a persons demographic can be inferred by data within the application itself, or through an online search. Among my peers it has been discussed that adopting a more western name, and dialect is almost essential to getting a job in some places.
> First of all YT and other companies hooked people on free stuff and after years are doing bait and switch - it is totally on them - not on the people wanting free stuff.

So you're addicted and can't stop now?
(almost)
I mean, okay, but the 42% tax bracket in Germany starts at around 60k Euros. It certainly seems possible that a person who makes what we'd consider a fairly normal-for-HN amount of money is seeing an overall tax rate that's pretty close to 42%.
Social charges are taxes. From 100k EUR you will receive only 58k if you are in class 1 in Berlin, so OP may be pretty honest ob that.
The school was likely using ISDN or some sort of digital phone setup and you lucked out. Hotels used to have a special data port on the room handset that you could use because the main line was digital (either ISDN or something else). Even then I could typically only get 28-33k, not the 53k (I never, ever got a pure 56k connection).
YouTube isn’t a service. YouTube is a website. The fundamental principle behind the WWW is everybody is free to point their user agent at a public website. Google wouldn’t exist without that principle, they built their empire based on having a crawler download everybody’s websites.

If YouTube wants to put a paywall up then fine, but until then I’m going to keep using my user agent which includes an ad blocker. I didn’t turn the adblocker on specifically for YouTube and I’m not going to turn it off for YouTube.
Excitonic topological order in imbalanced electron–hole bilayers
Look around you. We control adults all of the time. We can't trust them even with simple things like "don't kill each other" or "don't poison water supplies".
Is there a way to self-evaluate whether or not your belief is the product of social status preservation? If not, what good is it to recognize the possibility, save for accusing others of it?
> since Google's safe browsing has decided to block the entire domain instead of the offending subdomain

This does, unfortunately, seem to be the right call. There's no way to differentiate between the subdomain user being malicious, the domain owner being malicious, or the domain owner getting hacked. The only granularity of data available is that something under the start.page domain was distributing malware, so it makes sense to quarantine the whole domain.

I hope this gets resolved quickly! I think the response is likely the correct one though.
> treated it as a loss leader for over a decade to eradicate the competition, and now they have “won” they want to squeeze users as much as they can

every silicon valley startup ever has this same plan of attack, and no one bats an eye. it's kind of like a long-term bait-and-switch. that's just how these things work, apparently. sadly.
Yes we can determine that but the idea of the halting problem is that there is no general algorithm that can determine if a program will halt or not. So if we're including the human mind as the algorithm, then there exists a program that we cannot determine if it will halt or not. Theoretically.
They should have gone further like .NET 8.0 with a full class abstraction for datetime provider:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/whats-new/dotn...

This is 10x better and helps to assure the code can be unit tested with providing the exact date we want in the exact format/timezone
What would aliens tell us with this message?
┬──────────
┼─────┬────
┼─────┼─┬──
│ ──┬─┼ ┼ ┬
──┬──── ──┬──── ──┬──── │ ┬─┼─┼ │ │
┬─┼─┬── ┬─┼─┬── ┬─┼─┬── │ │ ├─┘ │ │
┼─┼─┼─┬ ┼─┼─┼─┬ ┼─┼─┼─┬ │ ├─┘ │ │
│ ├─┘ │ │ ├─┘ │ │ ├─┘ │ ├─┘ │ │
│ ├───┘ │ ├───┘ │ ├───┘ ├───────┘ │
├─┘ ├─┘ ├─┘ ├─────────┘

─ ┬── ┬─┬── ┬─┬─┬── ┬─┬──
┬ ┼─┬ ┼─┼─┬ ┼─┼─┼─┬ ┼─┼─┬
├─┘ │ ├─┘ │ │ ├─┘ │ ├─┘
├─┘ │ ├─┘ ├─┘
├─┘

┬─┬───────────────────────────────────┬──── ────┬
│ │ ┬─┬ ────┬─┬────────────────────── ┼───┬ ┬───┼
│ │ ├─┘ ────┼─┼───────────────────┬── ┼───┼ │ ┬ │
│ │ │ ┬───┼─┼───────────────────┼── ┼─┬─┼ │ ┼ │
│ │ │ │ ─ ┼─┼─┬─────┬──── ──────┼─┬ │ ├─┘ ├─┘ │
│ │ │ │ ┬ ├─┘ │ ┬─┬ ┼─┬─┬ ──┬───┼─┼ ├─┘ ├───┘
│ │ │ ├─┘ ├───┘ ├─┘ │ ├─┘ ──┼─┬─┼─┼ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ ├─┘ ┬─┼─┼─┼─┼ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ ├───┘ ├─┘ │ ├─┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ ├─────┘ │ ├─┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ │ ├───┘ │ │
│ │ │ │ ├───────────────┘ │ │
│ │ │ ├───┘ │ │
│ │ ├───┘ │ │
│ │ ├─────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ├─┘ │
├─┘ │
├───────────────────────────────────────────┘
My first full time job was doing phone tech support for dialup internet users for one of Australia's biggest ISPs in the late 90s. Many of the customers who'd call had just bought a new big-brand desktop PC (most commonly a HP Pavillion) with a winmodem in it, and so our job was to get it to work, even if their phone line was bad, or had other devices (fax machines, alarms, wireless phones) causing interference. We became very very familiar with the AT command sets to adjust the settings on all the different modem models, and with winmodems you'd often just have to slow it right down to 33k, 28k or even less.
I recommend you look into ad "impressions" and the compensation model.

Clicking an ad is not the only way it is monitized.
I suspect you are not finding many bugs in common built-in libraries via integration tests however. The same concept can extend to code that our own teams write.
What's the draw of Replit? What does it give you that Codespaces doesn't?
This is the worst time to replace your ad blocker with YouTube Premium, because by doing so, you're rewarding their bad behavior.
Not to mention everyone who creates Youtube videos with the expectation of making money.
Well, it does up until the point you decide an awkward user is "Competing" and then you start legal action :)
You may need to get some new friends. :-)

That is a great idea.
Been using this font for a while, but ultimately ended up switching back to Input Mono Condensed. It’s similar, but looks neater to me. And no cursive.
Even if this is true, the costs of digging are much higher than the costs of above-ground construction + the legal costs of acquiring the land. A hundred kilometer tunnel would be one of the longest tunnels ever built, and the longest train/track tunnel by quite some margin. And it would need copious safety features and auxiliary tunnels leading to the surface, even before the whole vacuum part gets added in. So it won't even completely avoid the need for buying above ground lands.
You can compare using their tool if you scroll down that page. I also use Jetbrains Mono. A cursory comparison seems like Jetbrains is clearer. Look at $, but also other characters.
The problem Apple created for themselves is staying true to their 'one mouse button' philosophy for too long and literally.
Basically the same, gravity doesn’t define left/right or North, South, East, and West for us just up and down.
I only get 1 channel at my location: https://www.fcc.gov/media/engineering/dtvmaps
It depends!

(I work for an auth vendor, so where I stand depends on where I sit, to some extent.)

I've seen and built apps that only needed built-in framework or language support. Or, best of all, don't use authentication at all.

I've also seen and/or built apps that needed advanced functionality to support business requirements. For example, if you want to:

* support slack-like workspace switching functionality for a single user

* but allow each organization to control the login methods they want to allow, including magic links, SAML, OIDC, LDAP, etc

* and make all APIs securely and scalably available to single page applications and mobile applications

* across hundreds of thousands or millions of users

You're going to want to use some of the more complicated standards. Basic auth ain't gonna help with that.
Sorry, could somebody show a source for that? An $11M bill, that’s nuts and just need a reference lol
Do you use Twitch? I don’t really see the direct competition besides YouTube’s small amount of live streamers that directly compete with Twitch streamers.
Ye well, I am just guessing as an outsider so I guess I'll have to fold.
> Occult Flash Tag (Android)

Sadly this seems abandoned and it seems to have been removed from the Play Store. It's also not on F-Droid, even though it does seems to have a Git repo on Github.
Since the victors write the (history) books, it seems fair to say that most institutional education is mostly propaganda.
I'm generally pretty supportive of new typefaces, but this one strikes me as... not very legible.

The x-height is so uncommonly high it makes it genuinely difficult to distinguish between uppercase/ascending and lowercase letters at a glance (e.g. 'U' vs 'u', or 'h' vs. 'n'), and similarly the descender is so tiny it makes it hard to distinguish certain letters at a glance (e.g. 'q' vs 'p'). The whole point of large-enough ascenders and descenders is to recognize the shapes of whole words before looking at their letters, which these dimensions destroy.

The extremely square aspect of rounded segments similarly makes them harder to distinguish from straight segments at a glance (e.g. 'U' vs 'O' are far more similar than you want for legibility).

Not to mention, italic cursive is particularly difficult to read. Handwritten-style cursive was never designed for legibility -- it was designed for speed in writing. Adopting it in a body-text typeface meant for reading adds work for the reader to decipher it.

I don't want to be so negative, but typeface design has certain principles that the creator is simply ignoring. They're not arbitrary or aesthetic, but rather are directly about functional legibility.

At the end of the day, this typeface goes out of its way to be surprisingly difficult to read. You can read it, but it simply takes more effort. Which is generally the last thing you want in a typeface for coding (or anything body text).
I wonder how it is nowadays, PCI(e) sound cards are no longer a thing and are mostly on the motherboard (ok well the on-board chips are probably more powerful than chips on sound cards from x years ago), AMD's on-CPU GPU are quite powerful too. My network card^W chip has an option to off-load checksum calculations.

Seems like there's enough spare CPU cycles even if some of them have been used for your written-in-Javascript IDE and written-in-Javascript messaging client.
This feels like criticising a bar for “enhancing the inflammatory views of its customers” who then go on to do terrible things. Like, I suppose there is some influence but when did we stop expecting people to have responsibility for their own actions? Billions of people are exposed to “hate speech” all the time without going around killing people.
Old, surprised it's still up, and related:

http://www.linmodems.org/
Yes and rats eat kittens.
Cong na li lai, hui na li qu.

It took me a while to decipher.
It's also worth remembering that blind humans who can recognize squares by feel do not have the ability to recognize squares by sight upon gaining vision.

I suspect the model is bad at these kinds of "reasoning" tasks in the same way that a newly-sighted person is bad at recognizing squares by sight.
This is 20 year old memories so I may have some of the details wrong, but the gist was the school had rolled out an early IP telephony solution and the landlines were just rj-11 patch cables into a monolithic IP telephony box that assigned each line a number and shouldn't have been capable of handling the dial up connection through that
And how many different languages can you upload too? Base64 encode all your subs?
I recently started paying for it. The simplicity from taking code from chatGPT to testing in realtime in the cloud, to deploying to production is amazing. Granted I am a hack developer but its created a new world for me. I'm done trying to create local development environments, I've wasted too much time in that regard.

Edit: If I figured out a production app that had legs, I would move it away to save on costs. It's more of a test space for me.
Yes. I think that's par for the course, most decisions and team management will be aimed either at producing revenue or reducing cost.

HR isn't there for employee happiness either, strictly speaking they'll do what's needed to attract employees, reduce retention cost through non monetary measures, and potentially shield the company from lawsuits and other damages.
I messed up the AI by writing something like: "I stepped into the gold mine where a fuse was burning. At last second I stopped the burning fuse and the dynamite didnt explode".

It worked :)
Noise about macOS died down back in 2018, and seems the linux port is riddled with bugs. This project is basically dead in the water.
Apple Says It Will Improve the Green vs. Blue Texting Experience
Sorry, ligatures are not for me. I don't get it. Why would you ever want symbols to collapse like that in a functional monospace font? Just looks like a bunch of funky unicode characters peppered throughout my source. And my caret can travel _inside_ one of these special marks? No thanks.
100% agree - but I think that extends to when your life was threatened in defense of your property
The Subsurface developer did that 10 years ago and it only was because he personally preferred Qt. Take a step back for a moment and consider that in 10 years that's the only major example that anyone ever brings out. GTK is still very welcoming for contributions to maintain the GDK backends. Developers like that have to actually step up and do it and have patience, instead of outright quitting and running off to Qt which has a whole company to maintain those ports.
Become an owner? Then you can fire the board.

Sole proprietors have no board at all. Although they have to deal with customers...
Anything that can be called "a vacuum" is very very hard to achieve in a large volume.
Not to dimish the problem but to add my own experience, consider that a delayed sleep onset can be confused with bedtime procrastination.

My circadian rythm tends to 25-26 hours. Every day I feel sleepy 2 hours later than the day before. That means every day I'm tempted to delay my bedtime by 2 hours because I don't feel sleepy at all. For the longest time I though the my difficulty falling asleep was habitual/emotional/hygienic.

After a decade of experimentation with caffeine, lighting, food, meditation, journaling, restricted sleep etc etc etc the best solution for me by far has been a low-dose melatonin supplement one hour before my desired bedtime. As long as I do that I hardly ever stay up longer than I should, and go to sleep immediately. Food for thought if you have chronic trouble falling asleep and don't feel like there's anything terribly 'off' about your habits.

(If I'm anxious/stressed I still sleep badly)
this is good, thanks for sharing
Said like a follower, determined to be loyal to an imagined hero, despite any amount of evidence to the contrary.
> The site ahead may contain harmful programs

We had that. The site got hacked and was hosting a trojan distribution point. Very discreetly. Once removed, we requested re-evaluation via the Google Webmaster's console and the flag was removed.
> No license can prevent you from making alterations to your private copy of a piece of software.

The right to make alterations to someone else's intellectual property does not exist except as granted by licence or fair use exceptions.
You can teach them how to use social media responsibly. Or allow them a phone but limit social media usage (though I prefer the first approach). It’s not like everyone is harmed, the same studies find a positive effect for a significant minority.
Sounds like a job for BVI corp. no one can even find out who owns it.
There's some compute also, which may not be counted in the 330M

"Co-founded by the Iliad group...To do this, the laboratory will use the computing power made available to it by Scaleway, an iliad Group subsidiary. Scaleway’s supercomputer has the highest-performance computing power for AI applications deployed to date in Europe."

https://kyutai.org/CP_Kyutai_AI_EN.pdf
While it's easy to pick on oil, there are also mass transit promoters and union jobs who will gladly do the same.