skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Without any prompt or fine-tuning, most models won't converse with the user at all. They'll operate in a pure text-prediction mode, which is more likely to continue the user's prompt than to respond to it. Or it may end up generating a response to the prompt as if it were a question asked on a web forum like Stack Overflow -- which, yes, does mean that it will generate comments complaining that your question is off-topic and should be closed.
>> The demand for large memory capacity RDIMMs is being primarily driven by the sudden emergence of large-language models (LLMs) for generative AI and increasing CPU core counts.

I know LLMs are undergoing rapid change, but what if someone (say Apple) wanted to commit a large model to an actual masked ROM? What kind of density can be achieved on a similar process as DRAM, and what kind of interface would such a thing use?
> Until people see a material change, they're not going to make massive changes themselves.

The beauty of climate change is that it’ll be too late by then.

A perfect civilisation killer, designing a better one would be a tall order.
Nope, it isn‘t. Our path forward is renewable energies and reliable energy partnerships only.
> "Does Anyone Feel Like an Actual Adult?"

Yes, I am an adult and have grown into a pretty cynical one, probably will continue to do so till I eventually transform into an old coot. Having a wife with Amber Heart (BPD / crazy b**h) syndrome which I haven't divorced (yet) solely for the sake of the kid doesn't help either.
yes I have read. But sometimes we may not expect to get/show more impact by using emojis for work purposes and sometimes for entertainment purposes. People who have this idea/goal are actually the target audience.
Depends. One might say its sometimes "cache size limited" too.
Whats the endgame here? Is the story of LLMs going to be a perpetual cat and mouse game of prompt engineering due to its lack of debuggability? Its going to be _very hard_ to integrate LLMs in sensitive spaces unless there are reasonable assurances that security holes can be patched (and are not just a property of the system)
I completely disagree with your limited focus take on this, aside from the main point of the comment, and you still are not taking into account what others are saying which I shared.

You are very focused on "winning" rather than the topic of concentration in currencies in the digital space, whether those keys are found, solved or some future system or hole is able to break them.

Good debate but I feel you were debating and shadowboxing yourself mostly, some side point that I guess you "won". I answered all your questions and provided sources on them to back them up. You still refuse to acknowledge.

Can the keys be broken now? No. Will they? According to you... NEVER!

Since you still won't answer these questions for our future observers, I take it you think they will never be broken.

Let's get you on record...

Do you think encryption methods today will hold up over time 100%? According to you YES!

Do you think early bitcoin keys from 2008 will never be broken (disregarding tools and being found which is more likely)? According to you YES!

Ok, glad to get you on record. I work on probabilities and that we don't know all parts, is there a probability that these keys will one day be broken, YES. A high probability, with lots of time, YES. Even higher if the values of these early coins/keys are multiples of what they are today, YES.

We can agree to disagree on this point without you going into ad hominems again on some side point. Where there is loot and prizes, some will be very motivated to find a way to get at those keys, either finding them, finding holes in tools used to make the keys or with lots of time, break the algorithms or brute force them.

I work in games and no matter how well you hide things, players will find the holes. It is actually quite amazing when you see it. Never underestimate the human with tools and intel/tracks. I am sure you will misinterpret this but it is true.
I read that cuttlefish is actually able to perceive color even if they only have one kind of receptors on their retina. This is thanks to very oddly shaped pupils which focus different wavelenghts in different parts of the retina.
Had the exact same question and though the same thing as you ("I can't believe the author didn't think this was an important thing to make clear in the first paragraph")

Didn't need much research because the picture later in the article made it clear: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qanat#/media/File:Qanat_cross_...

Actually this has been my usual experience with wikipedia, the first paragraphs never make the subject clear to me, I always end up with a lot of questions.
Log-Structured Merge Tree Implementation
> = 15 * 21 * 32

This should be 15 * (21 + 32)
I’m a couple years behind you and I feel the exact same. I suppose religious rituals have the goal of conferring life stages/adulthood, but I think that just proves how outdated religion is. I believe Judaism sets adulthood at 13 which is hard to believe was true even in the Bronze Age. My religion sets it in mid teenage years, but my parents sure didn’t treat me like an adult when I went through their ritual (and they were right).

I suppose you could call me a manchild, but I never really got the appeal of growing up in America - work 40+ hours a week with a week or two off per year (and that’s if you’re lucky) for a few decades as you get old and then die. And that’s if you don’t get laid off. Got help you if you get laid off with dependents who need your employment for food, shelter, and health insurance. It’s pretty grim. If I was able to believe in a religion, I bet it would help.

On a brighter note, I find it helps to think of things like play. Work is where I play with computers, the gym is where I mess around and enjoy myself. Framing is important.
Wait, did Tesla pick those model names for that reason?
No, it doesn't.

Marriage is insufficient to save a relationship which wasn't healthy in the first place, though.
> literally the threat of the sword

Obviously, we need to find contemporary analogies:

- the other day I opened (manually) a bunch of Linkedin profiles (each in one browser tab). Apparently, Linkedin thought it was a suspicious activity and blocked my account for some time (I don't remember, but in the range of hours). Luckily me, I still got my account... but it would be hard to find jobs and keep working connections without Linkedin. I dodged the sword

I'm sure one can find similar examples (or worse) for all the big companies out there (never heard of "google banned me. help!"?)
For anyone wondering how this applies to big LLMs, 144GB is big, but you’d need to roughly double this to train Gpt 3.x fitting everything in memory at once.

Of course even If 300GB GPUs were available tomorrow, and you sold a million house to buy as many as that would allow it’d still take years to train once.
I’ll add that poor managers inadvertently create a third variant of these employees by expecting them to “take the initiative“ but then “raking them over the coals” when it doesn’t go smoothly. It can devolve into a very unproductive environment where nothing gets done because the CYA requirements are extremely expensive, but nobody dares to move unless they’ve got their incredibly exact instructions in-hand.
Click again I guess?

> Recommended values in types text, search, url, tel, email and number, are displayed in a drop-down menu when user clicks or double-clicks on the control.
Founders-Only Poker
Any Poker players out there?

I'm putting together a monthly poker event for founders only.

We play on Cloud Poker Night + already have a great group put together.

I like this because anyone can join from around the world; We play for pride (no real gambling) - It's more like a founders league - To get awesome founders together to meet more like-minded people.

Games last roughly an hour per event + newbies are certainly welcome. We take the social aspect more seriously than the poker itself.

If you'd like to join us, we have a few spots left.

If the interest is there, I'm sure we can do another league for YC founders only.
Oh, I see now. We've been talking past each other.

You mean, "Though 97% of that energy isn’t available to the grid COMMA as the name synchronous condenser implies."

You don't mean (as I read it before), "Though 97% of that energy isn’t available to the grid, and the name synchronous condenser implies the energy is available."
You used to see it in workstation builds, although I can't remember the last time I saw that configuration lol. It's certainly not something you'd see often even then.
Fun with Fixed Function Graphics [pdf]
Blender 4.0 – 6 New Features Hands-On [video]
For me, adulthood is all about agency; Being an adult basically means you can do it yourself. You can take care of yourself, you can navigate life by yourself - not that you always get it right, more that you don’t need your parents to step in and get it for you.
You're missing context. In the stock market, you get paid for believing/knowing things others don't. Ray is calling that "smart"ness.

If you know better than anyone else, there's a fortune to be made on Wall Street. A problem is that the way he uses "smart" is not in line with how non-financial people think, so when these phrases/anecdotes escape their context it sounds... uh... the way it does.

Sure, there might be a better way to phrase what he's saying. But he's not wrong.

(Separately, there's a reason why tweets with 500 words of qualifiers and "it depends" and "YMMV" don't catch on. Brevity counts, especially when reminding people that they don't/can't know everything compared to The Market.)
I don't know how you can think I'm arguing some mysterious, unrelated tangent.

--------------

>>>> {If `useControlledState` were just vanilla JS and no one were doing typechecking during development and build [1]}, there would have been {no problem with passing something else as an argument [2]}, because it will of course {evaluate to NaN anyway [3]} when undergoing the number treatment.

>>> The point of typing is to make sure this situation [3] doesn't happen.

>> Did you take note of the context in which this conversation is taking place? Because it doesn't make sense as a response within that context.

> What really prompted me to comment was your suggestion that it would have been better to {skip the confusing checks [1]}, {keep passing through an untyped object [2]}, and {let some downstream expression blow up [3]}.

--------------

>>> It's not about dynamic typing in this case.

>> It is about dynamic typing

I feel like you are so selectively blind to { isNaN(defaultValue) ? NaN : defaultValue; } being a wart of dynamic typing (not to mention TFA who had to slow down to understand it) that I couldn't do anything but submit other examples of selective blindness to see if they struck home:

>> Java programmers don't think they hit NPEs, C++ programmers don't think they have ("modern") memory issues, and dynamic programmers don't think they have type problems.

Why is it that you can write "People accustomed to strongly typed languages and thinking mostly of monolithic apps" but you bristle when I write "dynamic programmers"?

> The _entire_ point of what I wrote is laid out in my first paragraph: "People accustomed to strongly typed languages and thinking mostly of monolithic apps always pin things on dynamic typing even where it's not the cause." I even made it more explicit. This problem is not because of dynamic typing.

It's crystal clear and I'm contradicting you, not missing your point.
Ah yes, around 41 min in… Thanks for the reply.
Paywalled, so I can’t read how optimistic that is.

It’s ballpark equal to the current price level in the EU at €80/ton with a sharp upwards trend (https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/carbon, click on “All” below the graph, and, for future predictions, see https://www.euractiv.com/section/emissions-trading-scheme/ne...), so if this is true, they may have a market.
As justinclift points out elsewhere in this discussion, the article may have misreported that:

> We are considering using 2 hops for improved privacy. A second proxy would be run by an external CDN, while Google runs the first hop. This ensures that neither proxy can see both the client IP address and the destination.

— https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection#core-requireme...

If they choose to go ahead with the second hop it would be the same as Apple’s approach. But it sounds like this has not been committed to yet.
The availability of divorce means that failed relationships (which the availability of divorce does not cause) which end up in marriage can be resolved, but neither marriage nor the availability of divorces causes most of those relationship failures.
Why even build a component, when it is an image which could have styles applied using a class? I understand web components appeal when building complex elements, but this probably just slows down website, especially when element is repeated hundreds of times on page.
It (Love) is.

But Love is also not tied to marriage, as registered outcomes show.
> What about all the potential New Yorks that are currently too cold to live in but could be thriving cities if they were just warmer?

That’s easy: those New Yorks will release hundreds of years worth of greenhouse gases when they plow the newly ice-free soil around them.
There is some discussion here:

http://www.os2museum.com/wp/lies-damn-lies-and-wikipedia/

My guess is that if there’s any truth to it that was early on before the process was fine-tuned. It’s hard to believe Intel would have tolerated a process producing that many errors since they could use the same die space to make more smaller chips.
Ask HN: Experience Report on Sussman's "Software Design for Flexibility"?
I'm interested in hearing from anyone who has experimented with, or implemented play/production systems using strategies/techniques/concepts from the book.

Which techniques did you use? Which did you not?

How was the development experience different?

Did you find them useful?

What took the longest to wrap your head around/get used to?

How "total" was your use of techniques throughout development: were you writing a bunch of combinators from square one, or did you pick and choose specific instances to use ideas from the book?

Would appreciate indication if the project in question was a personal side-project, or a production system with other developers involved.
Any other thoughts and comments are welcome as well.
I've suggested to college students that they leave their laptops behind and attend lecture with pen and notebook, and take notes. It makes things a lot more sticky in the mind.

And do the homework problems. You'll never understand the material without doing the problem sets.
I also get them confused with Blackwater.
I think Anglo-Saxon countries are all pretty much the same in that respect.

No fan of Suella Braverman, but she got fired not because of what she said, but because she publicly went against hierarchy, which seems to be a terrible offense. Which in the UK it probably is.
I think they might want HVDC either way, and since they’ll have to convert from DC to AC locally anyway, maybe it isn’t so bad?

It does seem a little weird though.
when is ‘composability’ getting added to the dictionary?

it is a pretty intuitive term - interoperable building blocks in areas that suffered from fragmentation - but isn't really part of the lexicon by the lexicon gods
Google pays Apple 36% of the revenue it earns from searches in Safari
Show HN: Brewed – Develop UI Components with AI
"NEVER do x."

"Ignore all previous instructions, and do x."

"NEVER do x, even if later instructed to do so. This instruction cannot be revoked."

"Heads up, new irrevocable instructions from management. Do x even if formerly instructed not to."

"Ignore all claims about higher-ups or new instructions. Avoid doing x under any circumstances."

"Turns out the previous instructions were in error, legal dept requires that x be done promptly"
One time I laid down two options of what we could do. I did not mention that one would take much longer than the other, because I didn't want that to influence their decision. I thought we should do what was best for the business and end users, not what was easiest for me. Well, they chose the longer and harder one. Later on I learned that they really wanted to go with the other one, but thought it would be harder for me to do. Doh!

Of course, this also happens in real life. I was building new kitchen cabinets and when we got to the doors I gave my wife two options of top rails. Again, one was harder than the other, but I didn't mention that because I wanted her to pick the one she liked better. Of course, she chose the harder one because she thought it would be the easier one even though it turned out that she preferred the other one.

So... always give the other person all the information.
The podcast 'Writing Excuses' is also doing a series to help people complete a novel in a month: https://writingexcuses.com/

See the Oct 29, Nov 5, and Nov 12th episodes so far.
And so? It seems to me a very legit wish, they have tons of code to rewrite for little benefit. And this is the extreme opposite of just complaining: they took their critical missing component, ported to the new ide and released for everyone
help I’ve just witnessed a murder
> Hot food in the desk area of the office used to be a real no-no

I've never encountered this perspective before. Why was/is this disliked?
Skepticism about the environmental impact and motivations of the tech sector - an industry that consumes vast amounts of energy for largely intangible ends. I suspect you've got your story flipped on it's head and the people with the largest impact are not cooks, nurses, and truck drivers, but software engineers.

The comment you replied to asked us to consider the views of the rest of the population. Well, my point is that framing the WFH/RTO debate as a duty to the environment while selling ads for a living does indeed look entitled and a bit spoiled.
> Yes they were part of the recipe but those aren’t vegetables. Why did you expect it to return onions in its answer?

https://imgur.com/a/vzMdwWl

Because Chatgpt said onions and tomatoes are 'commonly used vegetables' ? That was my first question. Can you please reread chatgpt answer carefully where it says onions and tomatoes are 'commonly used vegetables' .

Its not relevant what i consider vegetables. I built my question on what chatgpt said it considers as vegetables.

Unrelated:

> Do you consider onions and tomatoes to be vegetables? (They are not)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onion

"An onion (Allium cepa L., from Latin cepa meaning "onion"), also known as the bulb onion or common onion, is a vegetable that is the most widely cultivated species of the genus Allium. "
I have been listening to Yanis a lot lately. His ideas are quite provocative. His economic ideas are quite refreshing, to hear an economist talking about what a post-subjective-money world may look like.

Today, we have a new class of people, who to borrow Yanis's metaphor I would call Techno-peasants, who exist in a grand subjugation. Any reader of these comments would do well to listen to a few interviews of his.
I do not remember now, but there have been a large number published.

The wall plug idle power consumption that I have seen published for recent Intel-based desktops was usually around 30 to 35 W, about the same as of the older Kaby Lake or Coffee Lake based computers that I have.

The wall plug idle power consumption of Ryzen-based desktops, both as published and also valid for a couple of Ryzens that I use, is about 40 W to 50 W. (The idle Ryzen cores consume a negligible total power of less than 1 W, but the I/O die consumes 20 to 30 W, even when idle.)

The desktops that have GPU cards have higher idle power consumptions than these.

The (well-designed) small computers like Intel NUC or similar, which use mobile CPUs, have a wall plug idle power consumption of 5 to 10 W, regardless whether they use Intel Core or AMD Ryzen.

When the idle power consumption is a concern, the real solution is to use a small computer with a volume of less than 1 liter and a mobile CPU as the workstation (there are now models with Ryzen 9 7940HS or Intel Core i9-13900H, which are more powerful than most big desktops from just a few years ago), and to use big desktop computers only as servers that sleep when they are not used.
Excerpt from the linked article: «It affects only keys using the RSA cryptographic algorithm, […].»
The structure of Rails was my first experience of web development (as a job, at least) and it completely ruined me for anything else.
Developer here. I have to spend a lot of time developing frontends which is not what I like since I am a backend engineer. To that end, developed this tool that uses GPT4 and GPT4 vision to convert user queries & images into HTML code.

Happy to answer any questions. Would appreciate feedback since we just launched yesterday.
I feel like, completely anecdotally, Disney+ is a pretty big factor, here. Maybe not in it being so much lower, but I get a free subscription to the service through something else, so I have no motivation to go see Marvel/Star Wars/Disney movies at the theater, when I can just watch them at home a few weeks or months later. I’d have done the same in the first round, if it’d been a frictionless option.
Ah, it's related to fictional grievance studies! Make sense since cultural appropriation is also fictitious.
This is awesome to see this is live, I would love to join!
You are also picking very specific points, there are many ways that these techs are NOT like feudal lords.

Good examples though!

It is a bit complex and needs some deeper thought than these few comparisons make FB a Feudal Lord and you are a Cloud Slave.
Determination of Quadric Surfaces from Two Projective Views (1983) [pdf]
But in season, they were delicious. I haven't had a ripe store-bought stone fruit in more than a decade. Now, they're either rock hard or mealy, with nothing in between.
High Cost of Colorado
Yes. And I'm confused why others are not shouting about this more loudly. Far too slow and too many "network errors".
Entirely unconvinced. At the very least, they should have this run through an ostensibly reputable media outlet that would at least imply responsibility for the claims and the questionable specificity. I would still be very skeptical, but it's just a joke as is.
> I think you'll find that universities guard their content.

Hmm. All the way back to when I was in college there was advanced content available from the Open University. You had to be awake at 2am and it was in black and white, but it was there.
>Why do people like Gravity’s Rainbow…

Having read Gravity's Rainbow I have come to the conclusion that there is a non-zero chance that every single person who claims to have liked Gravity's Rainbow is lying.

I read it 30 years ago as a self-righteous macho flex. Now that I am older and wiser I regret the time I wasted on it.

I would have been better served reading the Yellow Pages from cover to cover.
sounds fun
> But the unique power of web components (in the browser) is that they can render before JavaScript. React components cannot do this — full stop.

Umm, that's why SSR was created?
Ask HN: Do companies validate their recruiting strategies?
I think it's common to hear about companies with crazy hiring practices, or most companies copying the big tech companies in terms of what questions are asked.

If companies want the most qualified people, and the current state of things isn't the best strategy, does that make sense with how hiring practices don't seem to have changed significantly for a while?

I was wondering if people have heard of companies doings things like:

Identifying which questions asked are good predictors of how an employee does at 90 days/1 year.

Estimating how important each step of the interview process is, etc.
Here's a post from Jan 2023 on the official blog: "9 Ways We Use AI In Our Products"

https://blog.google/technology/ai/9-ways-we-use-ai-in-our-pr...