skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As someone who has worked with massive typed Python codebases, I 100% agree with the author on Gradual Typing. It's literally the worst of both worlds. It's actually even worse than that because it gives the illusion of some safety when there isn't any, especially in Python where most of the tooling "fails open" by default and won't tell you something is wrong despite having annotations.
Daily Driving FreeBSD
The good news here is you're much less likely to be injured, when some moistened bint lobs a scimitar at someone.
It's interesting phenomena. We care about CO2 consumption and yet, produce, buy a drive heavier vehicles to transport every year.

It's hard to believe, that we really care.
What Is a ML Pipeline?
Do "you" get them forever too? Like do we have a little buddy in you to help us share knowledge and control over such content?
Wouldn’t know. The domain is banned on my home network for general antisocial fuckery by the site owners and operators.
It's probably closer to:

The test vehicles accept test/prod signed versions

Regular vehicles only accept prod signed versions

They are otherwise identical.

The test vehicles were sent test signed versions

The prod vehicles were sent the exact same update, signed with test.

This would not be uncommon since the test vehicles probably occasionally run test releases for debugging.

Further, the update is probably multiple signed pieces, and the only part accidentally signed with test was likely infotainment software.

Or something like this.

It's hard to believe they wouldn't test sending badly signed updates, so i have to imagine it's a particularly weird badly signed update.

In other words, i would not assume they are idiots.
What are the similarities between weather forecasting and financial market forecasting?
Few seconds left....

https://www.epochconverter.com/
In the EU it's generally not signed, as the limit applies to the vehicle regardless of the road.

For example, 80 km/h for lorries on the motorway in Germany, otherwise 60 km/h.
this is really cool, I've been looking for good snow-related weather APIs for my business. I tried looking on the site, but how does it work, being coordinates-based?

I'm used to working with different weather stations, e.g. seeing different snowfall prediction at the bottom of a mountain, halfway up, and at the top, where the coordinates are quite similar.
If I’m a mailman and this is urgent package - absolutely.
What is hilarious to me is the Liebert AC units are nearly the same design/footprint. When they went by, I was like holy shit, they are the exact same enclosure, down to the little rail thing in front!

Just have LCDs instead of LEDs or lamps.
This is one of the reasons I hate apps of over websites for things like social media. Especially since a lot of them also prevent screenshotting.
No psychic phenomena has ever survived the scientific method.
Discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38262124
Microsoft made some extremely generous patent grants to Mono and several major Linux Distributions relatively early in Mono's history. Microsoft didn't seem to want to repeat the mistakes that led to their divorce with Java and the early foundations of .NET with their relationship with Mono. In my experience of it, most of the "legal grey area" concerns around Mono for a lot of its history was either truly outdated/ignorant advice or intentional FUD from antagonists (many of which just hated anything Microsoft indirectly touches no matter what).
The problem for me was that I had a rough idea of how to implement (essentially it's similar to a recursive-descent parser), but I had a difficult time finding appropriate resources to confirm or deny whether my idea was solid, as well as tips and what not.

Basically, the existing material is a bunch of existing incredibly complicated implementations, the odd blog post that just throws a bunch of code your way without really explaining the why/thought process behind it, and books that aren't worth the money.

The result is that you can of course piece things together (as I did), but it leaves you forever wondering whether you did it in a sensible way, or if you constructed some weird monstrosity.

To put it differently: you can probably build a garden by digging some holes and throwing a few plants around, but without the right resources it can be difficult to determine what the impact of your approach may be, and whether there are better ways of going about it. Oh and I'm aware there are resources on gardening, it's just a metaphor :)
If that's actually true is just a Rebranding of the OCuLink branding where the Cu in OCuLink there stands for copper! And there are now 2 different makers of gaming Handhelds supporting OCulink ports natively and one Mini PC maker that's got a nice combo-use M.2 port that supports M.2 devices or an OEM supplied custom M.2 to OCuLink adapter that turns that M.2 into a OCuLink port that sits nicely flush with the Mini desktop's case there as if that was a builtin OCuLink Port!

And PCIe 6.0 is just PCIe 5.0's clock rates that uses PAM4 encoding instead of NRZ encoding. So PCIe 6.0 with PAM4 encoding and more bits encoded per clock cycle.

And ETA Prime's YouTube channel is featuring that Mini desktop PC in today's Video(11-14-2023)

And CopprLink is terrible Branding really there as OCuLink is just fine and needs no name change!
>you seem to live in a very templated suburb

I'm actually on the side of a small mountain, can't see my neighbours through the thick forest around me. It's anything but a templated suburb here.

The town is just a few minutes' drive away, though, with most of the common modern amenities one could want. If I want to go shopping at Costco that's a 30 minute drive away on the freeway to the neighbouring city.

Incidentally, the "cookie cutter" stores are all quite distinguishable. The people around here are all wonderful, so they give each store their own little identity and flair.
Oh wow, you’re right. That’s some first class misogynistic bullshit in pretty much every single comment.
You're right about this applying to new languages. I've added a note to the article to (hopefully) make this more clear.
My understanding is that they were bad until they eventually weren’t.

And that’s probably how this will go too.
Sail through Ubuntu history with DistroSea
If you want a violent contrast, cycling is out there. Most cars feel like submarines after riding a bike.
But it's fine to simply believe these agencies are not lying without evidence, is that it?
As a tidbit, this was part of how one of the teams involved in the original Spectre paper found some of the vulnerabilities. Basically the idea was to design a small CPU that could be formally shown to be free of certain timing attacks. In the process they found a bunch of things that would have to change for the analysis to work... maybe in a small system those wouldn't actually lead to vulnerabilities, but they couldn't prove it (or it would require lots of careful analysis). And in big systems, those features do lead to vulnerabilities.
I agree, but those rules require a crumple zone under the hood (basically between the hood line and top of engine). I didn’t write the rules, and I don’t enforce them.
I have terrible news. Your new, bigger and heavier vehicle damages the roads disproportionately more than the old one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law
Part of the transaction costs for your trading business is properly accounting for these transactions; if that is a huge amount of work and makes the transactions unprofitable, well, don't do them.

If you do complex transactions thousands of times per year, it would be reasonable to expect (and in many places be a legal duty) to figure out how you'll be accounting for these transactions in your books before the first transaction is made, and keep up to date bookkeeping for these operations continuously - not just making some reporting long after the fact. Like, such activities are so clearly above the level where either you hire a certified accountant or become a skilled accountant yourself, that's table stakes for doing such things. You're effectively running a business, so you're required to act like one, you're not permitted (generally, depends on jurisdiction) to just wing it.
Abe was definitely a crafty guy and had a tremendous gift for rhetoric, so it is certainly possible that he was playing a double-game. That leaves two possible readings of the quote, but IMO the "double-game" reading is only 'better', from a moral standpoint, for Lincoln himself. It doesn't provide any more moral cover for the Union as a whole.

If we take Abe at face value, he is admitting that emancipation is, as declared in the Emancipation Proclamation, merely a war measure, i.e. a lever which aids his goal of sectional domination. This is neither a good look for Union nor for Lincoln, as it undermines any moral impetus for the war.

The alternative is that we're reading Abe the moral operator, who is merely telling the people what they want to hear, so as to gain their support for his moral mission. While this is a better look for Abe, it is no better for the Union as a whole, as it still implies that the Union was broadly against emancipation (for most of the war, anyway), which forced him to defend it as a necessary war measure.

So either A) the North invaded to subjugate the South, and only freed the slaves as a war aim, or B) the North invaded to subjugate the south, and thought that they had to free the slaves as a war aim, when in actuality they were duped into doing so by the super-canny Abe Lincoln. In either case, the nation as a whole is driven forward by imperialist motives, and the moral outcome of emancipation was, at best, incidental for all concerned, except perhaps for Abe Lincoln.

This is a bit of a narrow point, but I think it's worth making, as it underpins my original point--The idea that the South was "unnuanced evil" is utter, a-historical nonsense, spread by goobers who don't read history. The Southerners were a people who suffered the most common moral failing of their time. When they were invaded (for the sin of believing that governments powers are derived from the consent of the governed, rather than military might) they were not immoral, let alone evil, for fighting back. Their posterity is not immoral for celebrating their ancestors' valiant defense of their country.
Great! You can contact me at this email:
* futvissoftware@gmail.com

By now I'm providing free soccer video analysis in exchange for feedback.

Yes, it's possible to use videos of the same game from different angles, of course.

These are two examples of videos we've successfully processed:
https://youtu.be/SxGV5W5Ka7M?si=kYNIe3tzoFm_-DKw
https://youtu.be/HUUcLKZKmfg?si=Xpcj4AtK5wOZwMot

While these are distinct games, if they happen to be the same, the outcomes are unlikely to vary significantly.
AFAICT some people drive inattentively daily. 60 days of community service for every time they drive is a lot more than a forced retreat.
Both are complex systems traditionally modeled with differential equations and statistics.
> it's difficult to measure the indirect impact of things like memory locality — I have heard such factors blamed for poor performance much more often than I have seen such factors proven as responsible for poor performance. In general, I only look to such factors when I'm getting desperate.

No thanks.

Cache-related perf counters are easily measurable, but the impacts are so big you rarely need them.
The hardware exists - PlexiCam (https://www.amazon.com/PlexiCam-Pro-Position-Anywhere-Deskto...)

I use https://snakeclamp.com/ - you can build a custom arm setup. I use a magsafe attachment and mount a phone running Camo on it. Works wonderfully and easy to move out of the way when it's blocking my screen.

Edit: Sorry didn't see the part about the part that projects your screen portion to the area that is occluded. That seems interesting but not sure how that would actually work...
I think the root of the problem is presuming that "engagement" is always good. Engagement can be for multiple reasons, and the problem will be solved as soon as we can figure out how to more qualitatively measure engagement.
I worked retail many years ago. I found the required fake cheer rather horrid. I was good at it, and every now and then I'd have an interesting chat. But I prioritized moving people through _fast_, because they didn't come to chat with me, they came to buy their stuff.
> So far, only Tesla seems to be able to update car software remotely, regularly and reliably. I'm certain it's neither easy nor cheap.

Tesla, whose computer systems quite regularly need to be hard rebooted while the car is driving? That Tesla?
Absolutely you can make customer service a much better experience for callers!

Here is how . . . .
listen very closely now . . . .

Hire and retain many more human workers. Train them well, treat them well, and pay them well. Give them the resources, autonomy, and time they need to solve problems.

Chop down all the phone trees.
That’s exactly right. Our code_region_size levels off a bit under 8 MB, so we set the limit to 16. In practice we see code_gc_count stays at 0.
The only "good" programming language is the language I make! Everybody thinks different and wants to optimize for different things. There is no existing language I've found that I "love"; they each have features I like but none have all the features together.

I've drafted up a language called "Moth" that has a lot of "meta power" to program block scope any way you want, as most languages hard-wire scoping rules, which I find limiting. Things like "classes", "functions", while-loops etc. would be defined by libraries, NOT the language. It's like lambda's on steroids and without bloated arrow syntax. But it may run slow as molasses, as scoping meta power adds lots of compiler/interpreter indirection.

However, it may turn out that only a few scoping rules are practical in most cases, and the compiler could then optimize for those. It would then only be slow if you are doing something "weird" with scope. Stick to a fixed known set, and things zip along. But finding that set requires R&D and road testing.
Because China is famous for its pump and dump reputation. The first wave is always crap, the second wave is crap with a nice paint job, and the third wave is hit and miss quality. Perhaps in a decade they will be in a better position.
Yep, I was going to comment on the blind spots. The massive A-pillars, especially, on newer airbag-equipped vehicles, makes pedestrians simply disappear. I have to constantly stay on top of it as a driver, and as a pedestrian/cyclist, I often see people turn their heads directly in my direction but they CANNOT SEE ME as their entire head is blocked by the pillar.

I found this post[1] to be a really informative read about why we don't see things near pillars.

---

At a traffic junction all but the worst of drivers will
look in both directions to check for oncoming traffic. However, it is entirely possible for our eyes to “jump over” an oncoming bicycle or motorbike.

The smaller the vehicle, the greater the chance it will fall within a saccade.

This isn’t really a case of a careless driver, it’s more of a human incapacity to see anything during a saccade. Hence the reason for so many “Sorry mate, I didn’t see you” excuses.

The faster you move your head, the larger the jumps and the shorter the pauses. Therefore, you’ve got more of a chance of missing a vehicle.

We are effectively seeing through solid objects, with our brain filling in the image.

Additionally, we tend to avoid the edges of the windscreen. The door pillars on a car therefore create an even wider blindspot. This is called windscreen zoning.

---

1. https://themartincox.co.uk/raf-pilot-teach-safe-road/
We get to celebrate every three years? Nice
The diet combined with the treatment does make things worse in the case of the condition I'm talking about. The world isn't black and white over here either. It's not cancer stakes but there are lots of people making themselves miserable with this "do both" approach.
Interesting but there are too many books
Sorry, didn’t mean to imply that, but my wording kinda does, you’re right. I just meant that if those elements aren’t, at least in the particular mix and form they take in these films, engaging for a given viewer, I can see how they might be boring. They definitely have a different focus and form than most films, including a large majority of very-well-regarded or “sophisticated” films (I don’t mean they’re just different from, like, Fast and the Furious X).
"Test Processor With New Thermal Transistors Cools Chip Without Moving Parts" https://www.tomshardware.com/news/test-processor-with-new-th... :

> Compared to normal cooling methods, the experimental transistors were 13 times better.

"Electrically gated molecular thermal switch" (2023) https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abo4297 :

> Abstract: Controlling heat flow is a key challenge for applications ranging from thermal management in electronics to energy systems, industrial processing, and thermal therapy. However, progress has generally been limited by slow response times and low tunability in thermal conductance. In this work, we demonstrate an electronically gated solid-state thermal switch using self-assembled molecular junctions to achieve excellent performance at room temperature. In this three-terminal device, heat flow is continuously and reversibly modulated by an electric field through carefully controlled chemical bonding and charge distributions within the molecular interface. The devices have ultrahigh switching speeds above 1 megahertz, have on/off ratios in thermal conductance greater than 1300%, and can be switched more than 1 million times. We anticipate that these advances will generate opportunities in molecular engineering for thermal management systems and thermal circuit design.
The Canterbury Tales Project reads aloud the original manuscripts
I get what you are saying, just tried it out myself.

A farmer with a HN user, a robot, and a book must cross a river by boat. The boat can carry only the farmer and a single item. If left unattended together, the HN user would eat the robot, or the robot would eat the book. How can they cross the river without anything being eaten?
ChatGPT

The farmer takes the robot across the river and leaves it on the other side.
The farmer goes back alone to the original side.
The farmer takes the book across the river.
The farmer leaves the book on the other side but takes the robot back with him.
The farmer leaves the robot on the original side and takes the HN user across the river.
Finally, the farmer goes back alone to the original side, leaving the HN user and the book on the other side.

---

A farmer with a HN user, a robot, and a book must cross a river by boat. The boat can carry only the farmer and a single item. If left unattended together, the HN user would eat the robot, or the HN user would eat the book. How can they cross the river without anything being eaten?
ChatGPT

The farmer takes the HN user across the river and leaves them on the other side.
The farmer goes back alone to the original side.
The farmer takes the robot across the river.
The farmer leaves the robot on the other side but takes the HN user back with them.
The farmer leaves the HN user on the original side and takes the book across the river.
The farmer leaves the book with the robot on the other side.
Finally, the farmer goes back alone to the original side.

- ChatGPT 3.5
Yup, I clearly remember the EU regulators pushing for higher front ends.
> the publication which did the supermicro spy chip story

How is that related to what we're talking about?

> does not deserve that moniker

That's pretty extreme. One story you didn't like, and that's it? I don't think anything, certainly not press releases, will meet your standard.
NOPs are not generally free.

It's a pretty old and well known technique:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48046814/what-methods-ca...

Note that this technique is really only legitimate where the used prefix already has defined behavior with the given instruction ("Use of repeat prefixes and/or undefined opcodes with other Intel 64 or IA-32 instructions is reserved; such use may cause unpredictable behavior."), and of course the REX prefix has special limitations. The key is redundant, not spurious. It is not a good idea to be doing rep add for example. But otherwise, there is no issue.
Via Card, stored on Facebook Marketplace. Using the "buy" button.
https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/247350.pdf contains references.
What's the incentive? Startups are created to earn founders money, at least in the form of wages off funding or ideally when acquired/listed. Pledging to open source doesn't work towards that goal.
I was partially homeschooled. I'll explain.

I followed a traditional school system plus homeschooling after school and in summer/winter. My parents are university professors so they mostly taught Math and English to me.

All in all it made my life considerably miserable. I didn't have holidays. My holidays had way more workload than my school. Imagine this: 4 hours of piano practice every day (applicable) plus extracurricular studies for English and Mathematics, usually more difficult than what the school taught and uninterested to me.

Anyway I think my example is quite unique and I believe you will follow your children's interests. But in any way please do not force your will to your kid. He is going to hate you for life.

Also, homeschooling requires certain traits that I don't think everyone has. I'd be frank and say that most parents are not suitable for homeschooling their kids unless they are trained in pedagogical education. It's one thing to learn and know stuffs and it's another to teach it effectively to someone else. It's a third to teach it to your own kid (that is, even being a middle school teacher does not mean you are suitable to teach your own kids. I have seen many bad examples).
Well it's a start, but weather forecasting is far more predictable imo
Directed acyclic graphs?
Excellent! I have been checking their blog posts every week since Bedrock hit GA.
Too Bad the Phoronix Article did not link there and according to the Phoronix article there maybe be some Trademark issue with a Company's CopperLink branding/naming as CopprLink(PCI-SIG) is just too close there.
No. I think those of us that work on enterprise software within massive orgs know the level of AI needed to do any portion of our job is leaps and bounds ahead of what is currently available. I can see some distant future where maybe this is possible, but I doubt we'll be using AI based on transformers by that point...
Switching over all uses of TCP to QUIC will go even slower than the IPv6 migration. TCP works for most things and is trivial to use so it will continue to get use.

But unlike IPv6 there's few barriers to adoption of QUIC where it really pays, so I expect that QUIC will be adopted by a lot of applications pretty quickly.
I replaced the 386 today with one from 1990. I was able to boot a disk I keep around that has MS-DOS 3.30a and Windows/386 2.11 on it. I also have Battletech on there and yes it ran with no issues! It didn’t work at all on the older processor.

When I pushed it into the socket it made such a loud “ker chunk” noise that I wouldn’t want to constantly pull out and reseat these chips. Especially since I don’t have the Intel “rake” like puller I had to use a pair of card edge blanks to gently rock it out of the socket.

Although I do appreciate the 10x humor of it.

It’s weird that so many people focus on the software, which runs perfectly fine in emulation, but seem to lose their minds that an $8,000 machine from 1987 shipped with a buggy CPU…

Hopefully this tbh t will encourage someone out there with a 386 to try to replicate this.
is it possible to self-correct, looking at initial value errors in the past? Is it too hard to prescribe the error in the initial value?