skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It is admirable to want an accurate picture of what’s going on with Palestine, but I’d caution against using posts like the OP as a good source. Consider starting, at the very least, with thing like UN Human Rights commission reports, Human Rights Watch, etc. Beyond that, Western media and governments generally have an extremely pro-Zionist bias, so if you want balance you need to look for it. Consider some of Norm Finkelstein and Ilan Pappe’s work.
> problems booking flights, lodging, buying tickets, etc, where when I go to checkout it fails

Because they are typically written using popular heavy frameworks! Big, expert teams of developers can't get it all bug-free and fast and smooth when working with them. Thank you for making my point better than I could.

> only request smaller pieces of data if you can, instead of resending an entire web page and then re-rendering the whole web page

You have revealed by this statement that you have no idea how HTMX works. You are making an argument against something you've clearly never looked at.
It is already a federal crime, just almost never enforced.
Well, I said needlessly because of the amount of times I saw people leaving Bluetooth enabled while not using any BT devices. Their phone enabled it by default, and that's how it stays for its lifetime. Even if it's small amounts, it must be chipping battery away!

Of course if you got a smartwatch you'll want to leave BT enabled to get calls messages and such. At least that's a good reason to leave it on.
A class is a closure ?
It'd be highly susceptible to erosion, and the channel wouldn't be stable. It'd either expand gradually over time with all sorts of ecological ramifications, or deposition would clog the channel constantly. Who knows, might do both depending on seasonal factors? Imagine the damage a hurricane might do to those massive cliffs, for example.
Where is this miracle police department because every time I've attempted this I got told to go pound sand in not so many words but with clear contempt.
What is the actual mechanism of the scam? Just not providing goods or services paid for?
Most people just don't know what they are talking about. I think the only way that web components would be winning is if they were designed around a single render function to replace react but of course then the entire react/svelte/etc community would be crying out because they can't compete with a natively implemented virtualdom so everyone would have to switch to web components. But isn't that the point though?! Making life exponentially easier for developing a web application?! We shouldn't have to need all these extra frameworks like react, the browser could simply give us a blazing fast virtualdom and then everyone uses that and gets on with their lives.

You only get two things with web components:
1. style isolation (imo everyone will switch to @scope because shadow dom is unwiedly to use, even me probably)
2. the tiny nice advantage of being able to querySelector("my-element") and being able to actually call instance methods on the thing that it gives back, directly. Dont really need that very often though, it just feels super nice.

The argument for web components is really meager and the tooling is far worse, like you said: SSR is missing, autocomplete IDE support for elements and their attributes is missing, bundling and minification is missing for the html templates and you have to do it all yourself. People are now showing off unminified js and ordering their imports manually like it's 2011 again and act like that's good. No of course that's not better than what we have. lit.dev is okay partially because I think the fact that they use web components is almost besides the point, it's just a single render function like you have with react again.
You missed a crucial point. Meta, X, reddit and other digital spaces that have user produced content make money off that content. It certainly is work to create tweets, posts, and comments, and videos on TikTok. This is free labor that these social media systems make money off of.
While I don't disagree with the environmental concerns, ships use HFO (a very dirty type of fuel that's essentially tar) and account for ~3% of all greenhouse gasses. It may be a net win overall if a proper canal can save many more ships thousands of miles of emissions per trip.

The Caribbean is facing seal level rise anyway if we don't find a way to reduce emissions. Again I'm not an expert on this subject, but it doesn't seem cut and dry that a canal would be an environmental disaster if it were possible to excavate.
There's an extension for it, or you can add a cursor to the end of each selected line and look at the number of selections in the status bar.
> All I am doing is pointing out that your position is coercive in a way that the opposite is not.

Mission accomplished I guess?

My point is that it doesn’t matter which is more coercive because each party doesn’t care about inconveniencing and upsetting the other as long as they get what they want.
I am so sending this to our district IT people the next time they make us change our passwords at school.
Our case is different because our kid is only 6, but homeschooling for us has been great, and fits our lifestyle. Besides his regular academic activities at home he has outside classes every day of the week where he gets to socialize with other kids, art, sports, etc. There are even groups of other homeschooling parents that get together. It's a learning process of course, but what isn't?
that's the only way.

except using a chromecast is just undoing what you thought you had accomplished.
From my experience I don't think product and management folks care much about the user experience either; it seems to be mostly ego and dick-measuring.

My target user is someone running 3G on their phone on the commute home in a crowded train. The designer's sexy animations and carefully coordinated state changes are not worth the extra 100Kb of 3rd-party dependency JS required to get them to work, because the user is not going to see them; they're going to switch away from the app after 10s of staring at a blank page waiting for the JS to download.

Seen too many "perfect" designs on a laptop monitor right next to the router in the dev studio fail completely in the wild. Every Kb matters.
> it's not entirely unreasonable to say "hey these two might be related" until new evidence and computer modeling is done.

No it's not. But in practice that sort of relation seems to have about a 10% chance of being an actual casual relationship.

> Regardless of how fuzzy the evidence is, saying that any given weather event is "caused by climate change" is still a safe bet.

When there is fuzzy evidence that X causes Y it is not safe to say "X causes Y" and I'm not willing to concede an exception to this when X = climate change.
I suspected this was LiquidPiston before opening the page. There's been quite a lot of their marketing showing up in my recommended content.

> But LiquidPiston has designs on applications outside of low-volume, hand-built drone engines or military generators that are exempt from emissions regulations. That's where a recent $30 million funding round comes in.

> "That's a big reason why we are raising outside capital, to cross these productionization and emissions bridges so that we can get to the commercial market. I would estimate about two years to where we are hopefully delivering with the DoD and then maybe one or two years after that for broader commercial markets," Shkolnik said.

I'm still waiting to see these larger real-world applications and performance specs as a we're still dealing with modelled/extrapolated guesses.
OK, I think the difficulty isn't the first level of implementation, but all the edge cases.

I think that's true about a lot of innovation.

So yes, the elevator pitch is just "remember the shipping and billing details, and use it by default".

But the question is the edge cases:

First, you have to remember that this came at a time when people were still nervous about even giving your credit card to a website. Cross-web identity wasn't a thing, password managers weren't a thing.

Second, you need intelligence for what are the default options to select? It's easy for iTunes when the delivery is digital, or for a Prime member when 99% of the time the shipping is free.

But what about for everyone else - should 1 click choose the fastest shipping or the cheapest? Is there a 3rd option? OK, you might say the customer should be able to customize that in the profile. But A) what if they don't, and B) what are the extreme edge cases? If someone wants it the fastest, is it worth it if it costs 100$? Or is it a % of the cost of the good? Is faster shipping by 1 day worth it if the shipping costs twice as much?

And so on.
I suspect there's an SEP [1] running at at least 12V in the vicinity, most likely blocking a rather large spacecraft, that's been stationed stationed near the canal, possibly before it was built!

It's the only logical explanation.

1. https://hitchhikers.fandom.com/wiki/Somebody_Else%27s_Proble....
Is this the same thing as "sunday scaries"? That is a much more commonly used term: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=s...
The canals are just the edges of the entire path, the part in between is enormous compared to them. Because they flooded a forest, there’s a lot going on in the intermediate lake.
But that's what I meant, using it when there is a purpose makes a lot of sense of course. I'd just enable BT, drive, then leave the car and disable BT before putting the phone in my pocket. Why leave it enabled during times that it's not paired with any other device?

To me it sounds like leaving home and keeping WiFi enabled. It eats battery because it's still sending beacons and trying to find some known device to connect to.
What kind of redundancy are you proposing? Dig another Panama canal? Where? Keep in mind that they already used the easy route.
Ok, but what if someone bypasses the cameras on your servers with looped footage? Did the auditor think about having security cameras on the security cameras?

Amateurs.
Point of order but 1/23rd the GDP
TA = Teaching Assistant, usually a student who helps the main teacher of a course by teaching some units of it, evaluating tests, etc.

TA'ing = being a TA
> Police have always had extra powers. I don't think I can hire a private investigator to go to court, convince a judge, and get a writ, or warrant, or whatever to place a tap on another persons phone, like the police can.

Hmm, that's directly contrary to one of Peel's founding principles.

> To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
> So you're saying the programmer forgets to use the return value at all.

That's what the original commenter said. Logically, how else could you forget to handle the error? The compiler will bitch and moan if you do capture the result and then don't do anything with it. You did take the time to read the thread before replying, yes?

> This is not at all a relevant issue

It must be, else how do you explain the many comments you wrote trying to explain how sum types solves the problem? Even while I continually told you they don't.

> Why are you discussing whether Go's error handling needs improvement if your imagined programmer can't even program?

I said that it doesn't need improvement because in practice your tests will catch the problem immediately anyway. I even said that it is probably fundamentally impossible for there to be technical solution to the problem.

And the rest of the time was telling you that sum types cannot solve the problem, despite your constant urging. I am still not clear how you think sum types solve the problem.

> Well, I've spent enough time on this thread.

Are you sure you spent any time on this thread?
I think we're back to square one here. Yes for other languages the Docker image is more useful, but for Go the image just contains a single binary file. It's just more bloat rather than more utility.
Native speakers are of course also very likely to pluralize nouns in the regular way when they don't know the irregular form. Usually, only very common nouns can sustain irregular pluralization. Perhaps dice carries on at all because it is often used both as the singular and plural.

I can't see any reason to think that native speakers are changing their patterns much because of what non-native speakers do or understand.
Very impressive. This made me chuckle:

> I asked campus IT to whitelist the MAC address

Back at my uni this would have been a multi week endeavour with a number of forms and likely a denial. This was 15 years ago so hopefully things have changed there now.
cmd + shift + e to focus the explorer

cmd + b to toggle it open and closed

cmd + [any number] focuses split panes (and opens one if it doesn't exist yet)

control + [any number] to focus different files open in the existing pane
He is saying he developed structuring and documenting as a habit and now it is second nature and doesn't cost extra effort. And since he is the one maintaining the code and coming back to it he is the primary beneficiary and is doing his future self a favor with the extra details.
It’s how it works for people that lack consistency. If you don’t want absolute privacy then you are also free to support an absolute lack of it. “I want privacy except when it stops me from getting at other people’s money” is not an acceptable option.
I think the author's examples/analogies are strange and don't really fit with or support the author's point:

> The Wright brothers achieved flight before fully understanding the physics behind the airfoil,

> James Dyson learned what makes a great double cyclone vacuum only after building them,

> The bicycle was invented without an understanding of the mechanisms which maintain its balance.

The principles in question are physical, immutable laws of nature, and they are in fact the cause of success, not the byproduct of success. You can be ignorant of physics, but you can't ignore it, otherwise you'll end up injured or dead.

On the other hand, the principles of HTML semantics were just an invention of Tim Berners-Lee, not God. There's nothing stopping you from ignoring those principles. This follows from the quoted tweet: "they are often disregarded by developers and tools when producing markup and styling".
This isn’t true. According to none other than Andy Jassy himself has said that less than 5% of all IT infrastructure is on any cloud provider.

https://accelerationeconomy.com/cloud/amazon-shocker-ceo-jas...
Developer portals
“request” is a word that can be a noun or a verb. Why can “request” be a noun, but “ask” should not?
As someone who has made a modest business around helping people find technical cofounders, let me share some things that tend to make it EASY to find one.

1. You're an expert in the domain.

2. You've done significant work to prove out the idea already. This can be a variety of things. You've already made mock ups or a prototype. You've interviewed a bunch of potential customers and organized your thoughts. Best possible thing is you've already acquired customers ready to pay.

3. You have a clear, grounded vision of what the product needs to be now and a grand, compelling vision of what the product could be in the future.

4. You can articulate what type of project this is clearly (venture backed biz? lifestyle biz? funky idea that has no intention of making money?) and what sort of working relationship or culture you'd like as it grows.

As someone who has founded before and spent time on YC cofounder matching, most people have vague ideas in domains they don't understand with no prospective customers and put no effort into validating the idea. So they try to offload the cost of validating the idea onto some engineer by building it (building, btw, being the most inefficient method of validating).
HEVC is widely used at this time except on the web. 4K Video recording on a phone or a camera is HEVC of course.
People forget how much the cost of a SmartTV is subsidized with the data collection. PC monitors are not doing that, yet. I'm guessing refresh rates and some other features are playing into the pricing difference, but without them being subsidized with your analytics, it's unlikely they'll ever be as cheap
What I don't understand is how De Beers hasn't gone bankrupt yet :

> According to industry estimates, the average one-carat flawless diamond had fallen in value by 50 percent since January of 1980. In March of 1980, for example, the benchmark value for such a diamond was $63,000; in September of 1981, it was only $23,000.

https://diamondssuck.com/

> Diamond:
Via Blue Nile: 1.00-Carat Round, Very Good-cut, I-color, and VS1-clarity diamond comes accompanied by a diamond grading report from the GIA.
Price: $4,565

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38252743

So, converting to today's dollars, that's :

1980 : $235.3k/1ct

1981 : $ 77.9k/1ct

2006 : $ 7.0k/1ct

2023 : $ 3.5k/1ct (and 1.3k/1ct for lab-grown)

Also, why the HELL would investors think that's a store of value, like here ?!?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37508058

I guess it's more «investors» + speculators instead, which only looked at recent values ??
Same with "invite" used as a noun in place of "invitation".
Maybe. I don't know much about Rolexes. To some they are a status symbol. To other groups, they are an anti-status symbol.

If you want your business/society to be more like Rolex, then I guess implement this prioritization function.
> ELI5

The model can look at X amount of input to decide what words come next.

Normally, Google fills part of X with instructions, and you control the other part.

However if you give it exactly X amount of input, then there's no room for Google's original instructions, and you control it all.
Do criminals overseas really care if they have an arrest warrant in Lane County Oregon for filing a false police report?
Huh, this reminds me my raspberry pi pico has no fpu, being a pair of cortex M0s. Maybe I should buy a recent teensy, which has the cortex M7 with an FPU.
Historians might look back at Intel’s and GloFo’s stumbles in the mid 2010s as being a pivotal turning point. Chips are the new oil and that makes the mid term future very dangerous.
Sorry, where is Lakera claiming to have 100% success rate to an ever changing attack?

Of course that’s a known fact among technical people expert in that matter that an impassable defense against any kind of attack of this nature is impossible.
how much experience you have with embed? from small iot white label like small business alarm systems to behemoths like Samsung... the only constant is they ship whatever and the lowest interns handle build
Right, humans are involved in fine-tuning, at least for the time being. GPT4 says, ..."core content creation and verification are human-driven tasks."
Celebrities do adopt political causes, but can generally only influence one issue; maybe something broader by endorsing a candidate or party, but with massive dilution. To do more they'd have to become politicians, but those who do almost inevitably end up operating within personality cult dynamics as opposed to responsible statecraft.
You have no armor, I do. Technology is an integral part of the human species and humans evolved along with it.
Really should point out this is for BLE. I thought it was based on heartbeats, heat, ingress/egress, or something more physical.

Also, ESP32 Rx sensitivity is kinda poor: -94 dBm, most devices are pushing -100, -102 and even -104 dBm. Makes a big difference.
What disgusting people.
Puts Apple's marketing in a new light, doesn't it?

>We’re committed to keeping your personal information safe. That’s why we innovate ways to safeguard your privacy on your device, why we’re up front about how we personalize your experience, and why we equip developers with the best tools to protect your data.[0]

Subtly left out that 36% cut they get from making a data collection company the first thing you see in thier app, huh?

[0]https://www.apple.com/ge/privacy/approach-to-privacy/
No, they're consistent on what matters. Privacy isn't the be-all and end-all of utility. It's merely one component. Being able to take back money stolen by a crook is something that most people value, and they are happy to pay the privacy cost to get it. A foolish consistency (insisting on absolute consistency for the wrong concept) is the hobgoblin of little minds.
Modesty is aesthetic, not functional. Pants have no mobility advantage.
Why not unload it though and transport by rail? The canals were built for a different world, before there were containers and giant ports for offloading.

Serious question, surely it's expensive to unload but so is waiting for the canal. For some loads it seems like it'd make sense to bridge the oceans using rail.
No, stationary only. It’s modular, so you can combine as many as you need for grid-scale storage.
> “The bad thing about computers is that they make everything run very fast, so fast that you can have a baby in nine weeks instead of nine months. But you still need nine months, not nine weeks, to make a baby.” Some teaching programs have taken steps to remedy, or at least mitigate, the situation. Yale has a summer program in Rome in which students are required to sketch by hand. McGill University continues to require classes in freehand life drawing and sketching school in the summer. The University of Miami introduces computers only in the second year of its program.

This all sounds so bad--like a cargo cult. Design isn't the building blocks on which code is built, it's the other way around. As you make larger more complex programs, you need the higher level picture to organize your processes. I certainly hope these programs are for UX.
> hm. so actually it's not compatible with commercial projects then.

Perfectly compatible: just keep all modifications to the original code in public. AGPL does not mean that all code from your company must be open-source, just whatever is in the same binary/program as the AGPL one.
Is that any different than for, say, checks?
Pretty much any scam you could think of. Previously, Zelle was like cash. Once it’s handed over it’s gone. Any recourse lies outside of Zelle. Now it sounds like you may be able to work with Zelle to get your cash back in some cases.
See here for example the black edge (or the white edge on the opposite side): http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/subpixel.php#subpixel.png

Windows ClearType text rendering exploits subpixel artifacts to increase horizontal text resolution.

Any kind of subpixels will result in some sort of artifacts. Tne higher the resolution, the less visible it will be, but it probably requires around 300 DPI to become imperceptible.
Let me rephrase: software development (the action of engineers and the whole process in general) is actively insensitvised to not care about security.

The consequences of poor security are often way, way lower than the costs of doing it properly. Add on to that, that security problems are contingent risks that only "pay out" in a small number of cases and you have a recipe for low expected value for investment into security.

Software engineers often want to develop a secure product, but they don't know what they don't know, and their employer is not interested in investment in their security capabilities, both the companies security capabilities and the capabilities of their employees.
From the video, it looks like a small enough wedding that it was not a wild party, but large enough there was a coordinating team who did not clean up: https://twitter.com/christinaqi/status/1719988127048352182
It is a prediction engine, so it has something like a confidence level for each prediction/token.
The laptop that won't die
Thanks, will do nore interesting things when kid turns older. Now he is just 3.