skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because that's just how their minds work. Finished with the website? Better log out so that hackers cannot access it when you're sleeping. Finished with the computer? Go to the start menu and select the "Power off" option.

LinkedIn is a massive professional social network, so there will be a ton of users who are not very computer literate.
+1 touché
Sounds like an ideal tool for misinformation and smear jobs.

"Look, here's person X with Jeffrey Epstein", etc.
No they don't. Especially tech companies which have been taken over by "recruiters" who do not have an inkling of tech understanding. UK especially has this problem as they have a huge recruitment industry and one of the reasons the UK is collapsing is because they cannot identify proper talent.
High altitude dust from the Sahara acts as fertilizer to the Amazon.[1] The biosphere is a complex, interconnected system.

1. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/goddard/nasa-sat...
That LitPot Link [1] to Poland looks really vulnerable if Russia / Belarus decide the Baltics need to rejoin. There's three others (Harmony Link won't be completed to 2028), yet that looks like a quick half-day to sever. Only 40km to the corner of Belarus, most artillery listed here can hit 40km+ {2] Get something like this if it goes total war. [3]

[1] https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/a-map-of-the-baltic-...

[2] https://www.army-technology.com/features/featurethe-10-most-...

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upshot-Knothole_Grable#/media/...
Because Google wants it? They don’t have to be the default search…
For many years, starting in 2016, Intel has supported SHA-256 only in their Atom CPUs.

The reason seems to be that the Atom CPUs were compared in Geekbench with ARM CPUs, and without hardware SHA the Intel CPUs would have obtained worst benchmark scores.

In their big cores, SHA has been added in 2019, in Ice Lake (while Comet Lake still lacked it, being a Skylake derivative), and since then all newer Intel CPUs have it.

So except for the Intel Core CPUs, the x86 and ARM CPUs have had hardware SHA for at least 7 years, while the Intel Core CPUs have had it for the last 4 years.
The smell
Here's an article from Microsoft forums on how to disable this "feature" in windows: https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/disabl...
Good man! For your defence of the dear leader, ̶S̶o̶c̶i̶a̶l̶ ̶c̶r̶e̶d̶i̶t̶ ̶s̶c̶o̶r̶e̶ ̶ dots = dots + 1
To get Apple's users to switch to Android probably.
Arch, Gentoo and NixOS also exist…
The trouble is that most people who have it enabled don't realize. If you're paying for iCloud+, it's likely enabled.

I'm not suggesting anyone should be complaining to you, though--I'm just explaining why some people encounter issues visiting archive.today links and providing them with a workaround (disable iCloud Private Relay).
Works on Linux too, just tested on my toaster! You might need to do some configurations tho…

Edit the file ~/.config/openbox/rc.xml and add a new <keybind> element under the <keyboard> element:

<keybind key="C-A-S-W-L">
<action name="Execute">
<command>xdg-open https://linkedin.com</command>
</action>
</keybind>
So long as you need calories to metabolize in your brain to think about anything, we are in a truth world.
The problem is that for granular access control, that implies you need to train a separate model for each user, such that the model weights only include training data that is accessible to that user. And when the user is granted or removed access to a resource, the model needs to stay in sync.

This is hard enough when maintaining an ElasticSearch instance and keeping it in sync with the main database. Doing it with an LLM sounds like even more of a nightmare.
My first book on Javascript was "DOM Scripting" by Jeremy Keith. He is still at it, pushing progressive enhancement, making HTML more useful with JS. I love this.
If I start from 0 empty sets, how do I have A point?
It's more nuanced than that - yes there are people who are self-diagnosing themselves and finding a way to cop out.

And there are charlatans - taking advantage of the situation.

Cerebral comes to mind - https://slate.com/technology/2022/03/cerebral-order-adhd-anx...

But on the flip side - these disorders are getting attention and people who were simply told that they were "dumb" and "retarded" are seeking diagnosis and treatment and becoming productive members of society.
I don't think you're forced to do it a certain way. The most mature RISC-V toolchain is the GNU toolchain, which is binutils + GCC + glibc/newlib/musl. Clang, GCC and all the libc's which are the foundation of most everything else have the assumption that you have one stack.

It gets worse when you consider that modern languages often depend on glibc too. Example: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/08/01/Increasing-glibc-kerne...

But, you can always go the golang route of depending on nothing but yourself. Then you get to decide!
PixArt-α:A New Open-Source Text-to-Image Model Challenging SDXL and Dalle·3
Don't give Apple any more ideas, people!
And in court. It wouldn't be surprising to me if they lost to Epic after Apple won, despite actually already allowing sideloading and alternative app stores.
I feel like teaching is mostly a one size fits all endeavor, but people learn and think in different ways, just like a processor is optimized for some operations but not others.

Take simple arithmetic like 12x17. Some people do the long form multiplication (carry the one..), some people say it's 12x10+12x7. Some remember 12x12 from times tables and go 12x12+12x5. Some people make it 24x8+12 => 48x4+12 => 50x4-8+12 etc. Some do it on the abacus in their heads.

All valid, though some are slightly more optimal than others. Good teachers empower alternative solutions and try to help people connect what they already know to what they already understand.
Including the authors of the study, we all want this to be true but from what I can tell by reading the discussion in the article the "aboveground carbon store" of monocultures might actually be hard to beat. Their data appears to be shaky and we should take other factors into account to encourage diversity.
I didn't see your 0:47 reference and almost couldn't tellt he difference but then it was obvious.

Isn't there a similar issue with sonic in front of the waterfall not working correctly on emulators?
This is a fine gesture, but it does not solve the fundamental problem that Supreme Court justices are an unelected super-government with lifetime appointments and zero accountability.

The whole institution is absurd and undemocratic and, as Clarence Thomas has proved [0], ripe with opportunities for corruption. A non-binding code of ethics doesn't change that.

[0]: https://www.propublica.org/series/supreme-court-scotus
Moissanite looks quite rational to me: It's very pretty without terrible externalities plus makes a reasonable investment.
> There is some revival in oil and kerosene lamps.

As another poster mentioned: mass production lowering cost, and newer products like LEDs replacing oil lamps.

But there's also a kind of fashion aspect. Some gear might be stuff that nobody wants today. And then it features prominently in a box-office movie hit, some people dive into it on 'the socials', and before you know it, the same items fetch crazy prizes on eBay, Etsy & co.

But you can't predict this. Storage & maintenance has an ongoing cost. And some goods never have a revival no matter how old or unique. Worthless now, worthless 20, 30, 50y from now.

You could almost say (for traders of such inventory) there's a kind of gambling aspect to it.
I don’t really get it. I hear people say this but why?

You’re at a fancy dinner to enjoy the fancy dinner.

You either do or do not know what you’re doing at work. Hopefully you do. I feel like most people do.

You borrowed money and are presumably repaying it.
Headline ought to be re-written as "Supreme Court forced to codify once-unwritten rules due to rampant abuse by Justice Thomas."
Any idea on what the root cause of the sqlite corruption was? There's some discussion on the SQLite forums about corruption with wasm (I've encountered it myself on a personal project), but from what I understand no one has identified a cause yet.
Good thing we are pushing everyone into STEM and out of being an electrician.
For those unaware of history, Google's "ad revenue share" deal with Apple is similar to the early "distribution deal" that ~2002 Google struck with America Online. The basic financial enticement is the same: use our search engine and we'll give you a cut of the ad revenue.

I've not yet seen a legal explanation of why the Apple ad revenue share deal is now "illegal" and yet the AOL deal wasn't. Somewhat similar deals also happen with tv networks where they sign exclusive "distribution deals" with sports leagues and they share the money they get from tv commercials (the ads). "Put your NFL Monday game or college basketball tournament on our tv network and you get some of our ad revenue."

I guess the difference now is that Google is really big. Ok. But is that really the only reason?
Related. Others?

Algorithms by Jeff Erickson - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26074289 - Feb 2021 (152 comments)

Algorithms book, by Jeff Erickson - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20733923 - Aug 2019 (13 comments)

Algorithms, by Jeff Erickson - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18805624 - Jan 2019 (238 comments)

Algorithms, Etc. (2015) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16379236 - Feb 2018 (6 comments)

Algorithms Course Materials, by Jeff Erickson - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3345041 - Dec 2011 (2 comments)
It’s not rhetoric. It’s a question.
That's fair. I agree that intellectual property does not have the same foundational justifications as physical property. IP justifications ARE generally based on economic efficiency rationales, and typically cut contrary to physical property rights (e.g. Why cant I produce a copy for sale with material I own, in a factory I own)

I was mostly picking at how you invoked externalities, which is a major pet peeve of mine. I feel that between sloppy economics and utilitarianism, the concept of externalities is invoked anytime anyone doesnt get what they want.
> It is recommended to place IPv4 and IPv6 addresses into brackets:

I tried doing this, and my brower(s) just assumed it was a search string, and took me to my search engine.
Does that mean they're not following the RFC? (section 3.2.2 of RFC3896)
Should I file a bug with Mozilla?
Show HN: Llm.f90 fast, hackable transformer implementation in Fortran
I submitted an earlier version of this a few months ago (as llama2.f90). At that time it had a lot of steps to run and was just a toy, now it's easy to run and is a competitive option for llm inference. See the motivation section for discussion and the `Performance` issue for an ongoing discussion about performance.
Are you proposing we do a Netanyahu-style reform?
That's odd; I'm certain I submitted the English version!
If I put myself in the shoes of someone who listens to and enjoys rap/hip-hop music, is a soccer enthusiast, or has tattoos, I would take the original comment as offensive. The main point could have been made without disparaging remarks.

> we all behave as if bias, discrimination, and stereotyping are inherently bad things. No, they’re the result of human biology optimizing for pattern matching and recognizing those patterns.

From an evolutionary perspective, I agree. In ancient times, this trait must have been really important for survival. But in our modern society, we are past that point, and the way we communicate and perpetuate stereotypes can have detrimental effects on interactions between different groups within our society, so even if it's still useful in some contexts, we should take it with caution.
This is an extreme view in my opinion, as also the previous poster showed. You can have 10 people with 5 wanting to work from the office, 5 who don't want. Or 10 that all want a hybrid model. Etc. It's not all black or white.

Pushing for only one way of working or the other is telling people how to live. It has been like this for many years because there was little or no alternative. Now "thanks to" the covid an alternative came. But hey, now let's all go back to the traditional way things have always been done.

If a company is fully remote (no offices at all) before you apply you know what you're getting into. Same for a company only working from the office full time.

The issue is the companies slowly going back in a forceful manner, taking away the alternative, and all the people feeling "lonely" or having their "way things should be" being fine with that and actually enforcing this.

All surveys show people want flexibility, yet we're doing a lot to go to the pre 2019 model.
Because they earn 56.25% (1/0.64 - 1) more from any user they can attract to Android from iOS (at least with regards to search)
citation needed.

When you're privileged, equity can seem like inequity.
Does it mean you can forget about rationality forever and stop trying to bring it to the world?
Does the ethics code have removal as a consequence? Does it apply retroactively to past events? If not, then it would seem no one is going anywhere.
Every designer I know (including myself) uses keyboard shortcuts like crazy. That's why Photoshop, Illustrator, Sketch, and Figma all have a very robust set of keyboard shortcuts. I assume marketers are the same—anyone who uses an application every day, really.
I agree Bessel functions are not excessive, they are just enough to scare you straight.

And yeah, physics students need to be able to solve QM and EM equations, can't get away from (some) special functions.
I'm not see game over.
The post is incorrect, only IPv6 addresses are meant to be put in brackets.
Redwoods and a few of the other big trees are unusual in that they stop trying to pull 100% of their water from the ground. It’s hydrologically impossible. Some of it comes from epiphytes like moss, higher up in the canopy. Absorbed straight through the bark or via adventitious root hairs.

Not all of the soil carbon from tree roots is in roots. Without the tree, more than just the roots disappear.
Nuclear is has the lowest number of deaths per unit of energy produced [1], except Solar. At the same time it's also the heaviest regulated. These two, are, of course, connected.

Isn't it logical that we shuld search for a middle ground by reducing regulation while taking care the number of deaths per megawatt doesn't exceed the worst current climate change culprits: gas, oil and coal?!

[1] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rates-from-energy-p...
I think this possibly fills what you're looking for.

https://learngitbranching.js.org/
Tired.

Get some stuff out to do a thing you’ve been meaning to? But you just cleaned the house. If you don’t pick it back up today, it’ll sit out all week. Will you still want to do that next weekend, so it’s not so bad it was cluttering things up? Maybe not, that’s far off. Kids or pets will get into it and mess things up. Better not do that.

Maybe really dig into that math book you started last Sunday. Wait, wtf does any of this mean? Ugh, it’s been too long, you’ll need to backtrack… never mind, this is hopeless.

Pick up that long narrative video game you started last month but haven’t put time into since. Forgot the controls, this part’s too hard now, and you don’t remember what was going on anyway.

TV or reading light fiction and watching the hours ‘till work tick down from the mid-teens, it is. Again.
These things are capable of being wrong and malicious in every way that a human can. To me it doesn’t really seem like news. A human is capable of creating a dataset to support a false conclusion, are we really surprised that an AI model can too? Do we need AI to be 100% perfect before people are allowed to start using it?

It seems easy to create a list of everything bad a human can do and then write a corresponding article about how bad it is that an AI can do it too.
> You can but them someone will immediately offer to buy it and you would have to raise the declared value until they stopped trying to buy it (ie to the actual market value).

Will they? Making actual offers isn't a free process, if they know I'm not serious about selling and will obviously just bump the price instead, then setting such a low price can deter them from attempting to buy it at all. Effectively it just becomes the "I'm not selling" signal and encourages them to not waste their time. It's also not like they care about the number I'm listing since it's not a price they'll get to pay anyway, they obviously know that if they offer $1 they're going to be turned down.

Additionally, like I mentioned the worst thing that happens is I have to bump the price up when I get an offer, there's still no real disadvantage to putting down $1 as the price. There's no incentive for me to put down a real assessment of value because there's always the chance nobody will try to buy it anyway, and if I get lucky then I don't pay any tax.

> The point is create conditions such that the equilibrium declared value is aligned with the market value. And more generally, to try and ensure assets are allocated to their highest value uses.

Sure, I'm saying your system doesn't work if there's no risk of your thing being bought for the price you declare.

> you would have to raise the declared value until they stopped trying to buy it (ie to the actual market value)

Going back to the original point, that's not market value, that's above market value.
This made me think of Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency, Douglas Adams's 1987 novel, where there's an AI company that takes military and political decisions and comes up with post hoc rationalizations for them.
At one point, I was fastidiously replacing the word "ask" with "request" in every Google Doc I had edit access too.

I've since given up, it's just too overwhelming. For every "ask" I squash, there's 5 more being thrown at me in Slack and emails and Google Docs and Slides.
I would suggest doing activities outside the computer as the only real way of fighting lone-less- I have recently changed cities and went to the facebook group of the city.

There I used the search function to find groups of people playing Tennis and Soccer. I then showed up and started making friends/plans/hikings/coffees.

I also found out how I could mentor people in tech and grabbed a coffee with a few people who were late in their careers and trying to change jobs [it isn't a tech city, so people work more like "IT work"].

Also simply going for walks and coffees on the same places ensures you see familiar faces and start conversations!

Making contact with real people is the way - staying in online forums like this and Reddit is the opposite of what you want
When I moved oversees I moved to a place which has digital meters with SIM-cards for gas, electricity and water.

I get billed what I use. I have a maximum of 30 days delay to learn whether I have a gas/water leak somewhere or whether my neighbor is 'using' my electricity to grow his 'herbs'.

And overall, this saves everybody money. I can track my usage more closely, and the companies don't need to pay meter-people anymore.
> and zero accountability

They can be impeached?
I think I am largely MCU agnostic, although preferably something where I can use Arduino since I am familiar with that. Good to know that ESP8266 is more energy efficient. I have seen this video which demonstrates that the ESP8266 can run off 2 AA batteries for 425 days [1].

Another thought I was having was to write a mobile app that as volunteers walk by the sensor would send data to their phone, which would then forward it to my backend. I suppose this is a mesh network of sorts? Not sure if this is feasible or a good idea though :/

[1] - https://youtu.be/IYuYTfO6iOs?si=oLuJiGxdQ8VHyu29&t=837
You can buy Fairphone or Liberty Phone.
> unelected super-government with lifetime appointments and zero accountability

And what's the problem? That's exactly the point of this system — a part of government that is still _appointed by elected representatives_, but is not populist.
Pasta and Rice May Be Healthier as Leftovers. Here's Why
But it is if you are viewing advertisements. That is the argument that Yanis makes in the book anyway, heavily simplified and removed of a lot of context.

The point is that you can't choose what you read or watch. We still can somewhat - we can install adblock and decide what media to consume. But instead of a "capitalist" effort to simply try to to invest in better "content", you could make the case that cloud companies are simply holding content hostage and demanding more of your attention, money, and time. Even at the expense of civil rights like privacy. It is stuff that gets talked about every day on Hackernews. It isn't that far fetched that antagonistic serfdom is basically the type of relationship large tech conglomerates treat their users. Dark UI patterns. EULAs.

I would agree that it doesn't make sense on it's face, but only in the context of a comprehensive macroeconomic analysis. That's what the good deal of the book is about.
they're still losing money.. it's inevitable...
Huh? We've gone from being mad at Google for bribing Apple to being mad at Apple for charging too much?
Minimum wage is a red herring. If workers want real change how about tying worker pay to some percentage of CEO pay? Example: if your average employee is legally required to earn, say, 1/10th of what the CEO earns then if the McDonalds CEO makes $9,200 [1] an hour they'll have to pay their average employee $920 an hour. Of course this isn't sustainable so in practice worker pay will drive CEO pay: if the CEO wants to earn more, they'll need to pay their employees more.

[1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/mcdonalds-starbucks-ceos-more...
Exclusive deals can present antitrust issues, but the kicker is that this isn't even an exclusive deal, it's a default deal! Users can still can still use other search engines on iOS devices.
Related. Others?

Lessons I wish I had learned before I started teaching differential equations [pdf] (1997) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32530035 - Aug 2022 (177 comments)

10 lessons I wish I had learned before I started teaching differential equations - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19005798 - Jan 2019 (2 comments)

Lessons I Wish I Had Learned Before Teaching Differential Equations (1997) [pdf] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15163979 - Sept 2017 (108 comments)

Ten lessons I wish I had learned before teaching differential equations (1997) [pdf] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11207183 - March 2016 (118 comments)
See my reply below.

I have found that deliberately hurting others; regardless of whether or not they deserve it, tends to be corrosive to my mental well-being.
Same is true of most of government. From the FDA to the ATF practical life altering choices are increasingly made by a unelected permanent government unfettered by things like accountability.
This brings things back to taxation of realized vs unrealized gains. If you want fair Taxes, we should probably do away with property tax entirely, and focus more on income taxes themselves.
In his autobiography, the linguist R.M.W. Dixon (who could concentrate at least well enough to produce great scholarship into old age) suggested that the break was puberty. He wished he could go back to that halcyon time of boyhood before a redblooded man would constantly find his thoughts turning to sex. No later advance in years was as clearly harmful as that.
Layoffs are always a bummer, and folks in gaming have more than their share to deal with (it seems, I don't actually know how it compares with other industries).

However, seeing the Crown channel go isn't a big surprise. In fact, learning that it is Amazon-produced makes its content make more sense; even as a 39 year old, the programming felt cringy in an overly-produced corporate way.
Not as fun/odd but

Ctrl+Shift+Alt+Win+
N = OneNote
O = Outlook
P = PowerPoint