skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Se desideri esplorare il mondo della realtà virtuale con facilità e comfort, le Cuffie Occhiali 3D VR di Auto Ventshade sono la scelta ideale. Questo dispositivo offre un'esperienza VR di alta qualità, con una serie di funzionalità che ti permetteranno di immergerti completamente in un mondo virtuale.

Qualità Visiva Eccezionale

Le Cuffie VR di Auto Ventshade sono progettate per offrire un'esperienza visiva straordinaria. La luce anti-blu protegge i tuoi occhi mentre guardi contenuti VR sul tuo smartphone da 5-7 pollici. Queste cuffie VR sono dotate di regolazione della distanza interpupillare e dell'oggetto, il che significa che puoi adattarle alla tua visione personale per godere di immagini nitide e coinvolgenti.

App e Tecnologia 3D Aggiornate

Grazie alla tecnologia 3D appena aggiornata, puoi trovare una vasta selezione di giochi e app di film VR nell'app store o guardare film, animazioni, concerti panoramici e giochi VR direttamente su YouTube. La qualità delle immagini dipende dalla risoluzione del tuo telefono e dalla qualità del video, ma con l'ottimizzazione HD e il supporto per i giochi 3D, sarai immerso in un mondo di intrattenimento.

Controller Versatile

Le Cuffie Occhiali 3D VR di Auto Ventshade includono un controller che può essere utilizzato sia dagli utenti iOS che Android. Questo controller è adatto per alcuni piccoli giochi e può anche fungere da mouse Bluetooth. È un modo conveniente per controllare il tuo ambiente VR e interagire con le tue app preferite.

Compatibilità Universale

Queste cuffie VR sono compatibili con la maggior parte degli smartphone non curvi con dimensioni dello schermo comprese tra 5 e 7 pollici. Prima di inserire il telefono, assicurati di rimuovere la custodia del telefono e di aumentare la luminosità del video per un'esperienza ottimale.

Assistenza e Servizio Clienti

Auto Ventshade offre assistenza completa ai clienti, fornendo manuali utente in sei lingue diverse per VR e controller. Se hai domande o dubbi, il loro team di assistenza sarà disponibile per aiutarti.

In conclusione, le Cuffie Occhiali 3D VR di Auto Ventshade sono un ottimo modo per immergersi nella realtà virtuale. Confortevoli, di alta qualità e compatibili con una vasta gamma di smartphone, queste cuffie ti offrono un'esperienza VR coinvolgente e avvincente. Scegli Amazon Fulfillment per la consegna rapida e affidabile e inizia il tuo viaggio nella realtà virtuale oggi stesso.
(x) doubt.
> Yes, because you could in theory run `pip install`, then manually read through every file you've just downloaded, then run `python myapp.py`.

This security model is utter nonsense because no one does this.
Bpftime: Userspace eBPF runtime for fast Uprobe and Syscall hook and Plugins
And the majority of them have been hunted to near extinction, in some cases not even because they're particularly dangerous, just because it's fun to shoot things. One person indeed stands no chance against such a beast, but that's why it's always a group of several people that takes the job on, and they come armed, and with a plan, and they don't stop until it's dead.

People are very good at this, possibly too good, which I assume is why there are laws against doing this to drivers.
It seems that much like we become able to delegate tasks like setting down a coffee cup to our subconscious on Earth, after a while in microgravity astronauts become accustomed to "setting things down" in midair. It's could be that just like in a shop on the ground, "where did I set down that wrench" is an issue; an astronaut might "set down" a tool in midair on a spacewalk and forget that they're not in a confined space.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVxaL8CAO4M
> but a car is crap in places with poor roads and snow.

That's a false dichotomy. 4x4 cars often do better on poor roads and snow, lower center of gravity is better if you don't need ground clearance, and weight distribution of a pickup isn't great for snow etc. unloaded. Of course this assuming actual roads, not off-road.

The whole 4x4 truck things is even more complicated - good off-road performance and good freeway performance are in many ways at cross purposes.

The real intrinsic value of a pickup is open air bed space (easier access than a van, but less protected), I don't mean they don't do other things well, just that is what the form factor gets you. The way the market developed they have also turned into the vehicle of choice for towing, but that's not intrinsic, just useful. Outside of 5th wheels, I suppose, where you need the platform. That isn't most towing in that size.

The % of light pickups is more a regulatory incentive and marketing phenomena than a reflection of real utility.
And are the only ones incentivized to, given the asymmetric danger between driving and walking. Drivers would be a lot more cautious with big spike in the middle of their steering wheel. Externalized risk (and unlikelihood of facing consequences if a driver were to maim or kill someone) has a very predictable outcome.
Wonderful comment, mainly because it consideres several cords of thought about their development that I've never considered before or seen covered in this specific way.

Many people have described the so-called Nuclear Peace that followed the second world war, and which holds to this very day, and while some disagree about its reality, I think it's a very real thing that has been one of the major reasons why no two major nation states have gone into open war since WWII, but the question of timing for nuclear weapons development as a cause for these weapons leading to the underlying psychological causes of the nuclear peace is interesting.

I personally do believe the Nuclear Peace is still very present in geopolitics. I can very easily imagine say, China invading the obvious target of eastern Russia, or Russia having launched a broader invasion of eastern Europe instead of just Ukraine were the background threat of nuclear bombs not always looming behind all these potential acts of war between major powers.

Even back in the late 40s and early 50's, when Stalin was alive and very much in love with the idea of launching yet another war to conquer even more of Europe, I think he was specifically restrained for the same reason. Just a few examples among many.
And then there's the absurdity of using a "driver's license" as some form of universal government ID.
Compared to Mars the moons of the gas giants have at least three major hurdles for long-term human habitation: their distance, with the trip there being around 6 years, the incredibly harsh planetary radiation belts the moons weave through, and ineffectiveness of solar energy that far away from the sun.

I think we should try to overcome these hurdles, but getting humans out there is a much taller order than establishing a human presence on Mars.
https://realpython.com/tutorials/computer-vision/
Weather isn’t fundamentally unpredictable. We predict weather with a fairly high degree of accuracy (for most practical uses), and the accuracy getting better all the time.

https://scijinks.gov/forecast-reliability
VS code is reasonably fast, sane defaults and language support, that's why it's popular.

Plugins are overrated and I try not to use them as much as I can.
IMO a chaotic system will not allow for long-term forecast, but if there is any type of pattern to recognize (and I would assume there are plenty), an AI/ML model should be able to create short-term prediction with high accuracy.
You create apt, rpm repos. And arch. And gentoo. And FreeBSD ports. And homebrew and macports. And whatever windows does. And you need that to be true, on all those systems, for all your dependencies too. And at a recent, usable version.

Or, I just use cargo. Up to date version. One command install that works on every operating system. Project scoped dependencies - so there’s no need for sudo, and different projects can depend on different versions of their dependencies. And I can publish new versions of my packages with 1 command and they’re available everywhere.

Just in my house I have a Linux mint workstation, a windows gaming pc, a FreeBSD server and a Mac laptop. Cargo lets me publish code that all of them can consume with 1 command. So does npm.

So long as apt is worse than cargo I won’t use it for this stuff. Why does everything have to get installed system wide? Nix doesn’t need that. Why doesn’t it have a programmatic mirror of cargo so we don’t need to mirror rust projects in it by hand? Why do major versions have different package names? And why don’t packages support feature flags? Last time I looked there were about 30 vim packages with random combinations of feature flags set. Why can’t evergreen packages like nodejs or cargo stay up to date in Debian? Old nodejs is useless because it can’t run modern JavaScript.

I really want apt to solve all these problems because I hate docker. If apt and friends did their job well, docker wouldn’t be necessary or popular.

Cargo isn’t pretty either. But it has all the features I need to get my job done. Make apt a compelling tool and I’ll switch to it. The feature list developers want is hardly a mystery.
At the same time, we're losing tons of mechanical problems that use to go wrong with cars. The amount of time lost to car malfunctions is way down over the past couple decades, even with slight regressions like this one.
Presumably for whatever reason it worked well for us to develop as we did down here? Stops everything from exploding, dissolves all the other gases quite nicely? What other gas would you use?
It's not actually supposed to be a call to break the law...
Yes, but they won't clock as fast because they'll be waiting for RAM.
Yeah, regardless of hallucinations and repeating the same mistake even after you tell it to fix it, iterating with ChatGPT is so much less stressful than iterating with another engineer.

I almost ruined my relationship with a coworker because they submitted some code that took a dependency on something it shouldn't have, and I told them to remove the dependency. What I meant was "do the same thing you did, but instead of using this method, just do what this method does inside your own code." But they misinterpreted it to mean "Don't do what this method does, build a completely different solution." Repeated attempts to clarify what I meant only dug the hole deeper because to them I was just complaining that their solution was different from how I would've done it.

Eventually I just showed them in code what I was asking for (it was a very small change!) and they got mad at me for making such a big deal over 3 lines of code. Of course the whole point was that it was a small change that would avoid a big problem down the road...

So I'll take ChatGPT using library methods that don't exist, no matter how much you tell them to fix it, over that kind of stress any day.
Thanks. Any examples of Python 3 code worth looking at?
Yes it does...what bizarre takes. Lack of health insurance affects a gap of people that don't qualify for public programs and can't afford private insurance. Many people with way less than a million dollars buy private health insurance.
Certainly that dialectic principle is broadly known. But it's specifically (mis)attributed to Stalin with the reference to wartime production/conscription and you won't find that in his works, recorded speeches or memoirs of contemporaries.

This goes in fact for most of his grand quotes. Whatever deep sounding passage are attributed to him and can't be traced back to Marxism tenets, are typically adaptations from the Bible, reflecting his education as a priest.
The world is going to change very quickly.
The complaint is claiming that this group should be held liable under the section of the DMVA relating to misrepresentation.
California since that’s where Google principal place of venue is and also that given in the TOS allegedly breached.
Yes, they are providing the "experience of open space" :)

And apparently there's nothing funnier than an embarrassed astronaut.
This holiday season is the first since ChatGPT, Bard, Claude and other tools have become widely available. AI is your secret weapon for writing Black Friday emails that grab attention, captivate your audience and drive conversions. In this post, I’ll show you how.
This vulnerability was not caused by OoO or speculative execution. It was caused by the fact that x86 was designed 45 years ago, and has had feature after feature piled on the same base, which has never been adequately rebuilt.

The more proximate cause is that some instructions with multiple redundant prefixes (which is legal, but pointless) have their length miscalculated by some Intel CPUs, which results in wrong outcomes.
What about this makes it an "AI robot machine" and not a "programmed machine"?
Yes. Very accurate as long as you don’t need to predict the unpredictable.
So it’s useless.

Edit: I do see a benefit to the idea if you compare it to the Chaos Theorists “gaining intuition” about systems.
Increasingly heavy vehicles create a safety arms race that incentives every vehicle on the road to get bigger and heavier in hopes of surviving a collision with one of these behemoths.

Maybe instead crash safety regulations should hold vehicles responsible for absorbing their own kinetic energy. You want to make a 6000 pound SUV, well then you need to engineer in ways to reduce the damage it does to smaller passenger cars.
I don't think I want the government to be spending money to ascertain the quality of recreational drugs -- it seems like an endorsement of such drugs. In theory, brands that earn a reputation for high quality could develop.
Yep. It's usually the wrong tree species, wrong placement, or poor maintenance that leads to problems. I had 100'+ pine trees in my hard. Beetles were somewhat of a problem but the woodpeckers were all over them and systemics helped.

Grew up in an house with 60' Australian willows that became too fragile and messy and were too close to a structure. Also, never get lemon trees because thorns from hell.
Those laws exist, but if it is a legitimate accident, and the person doesn't have a criminal history otherwise it is very likely that they walk away without any jail time.
Or don't.

HTML emails were a mistake.
> It’s amazing to imagine how much of human history was never preserved

period instruments in this case made me fear that the orphans were future castrati, but thankfully that piece of history was not preserved. Turns out this was an orphanage for girls, putte, who were in fact trained to sing, and they are depicted in the painting. (the term putto, boy", was used to refer to male cherubs)
Chat UX Is Great, but Wait Till You See Agent UX
these theories all rely on an extremely coordinated government.

in this case it was a direct referendum passed by voters, overwhelmingly.

the measure itself is quite comprehensive, read it yourself to see if it fits into a roundabout theory
So you’re a German software engineer who is fluent in Chinese, and reads pro Chinese “newspapers” from Singapore? You also happen to be awake at all hours of the day, and speak completely fluent English. You’re also a German who for some reason is extremely pro RPC? Color me skeptical. It’s also hilarious that you just did exactly what the top comment pointed out you would do:

> Claim to be part of a group held dear by the audience.

> Antistatement: Im totally against <topic>, but <propaganda narrative talking points >.

Btw, the interview questions seem very clearly aimed at creating a narrative, so yes. There were no personal questions, only questions aimed at supporting a narrative.

China has a documented history of such tactics. For example, state TV aired the “confessions” of Chinese human rights lawyers Wang Yu and Jiang Tianyong when they were in detention. Lawyers literally convicted of “subverting state power”, “inciting subversion of state power” or “picking quarrels and provoking trouble”.

Women coming forward in the US is hard enough, and women being silenced here is still a problem. Never mind a country where no state official is investigated for such things, where there is no free press to independently investigate these things, with a history of arresting and disappearing activists.

But let’s hand wave all of that clear and consistent history away, or pretend it doesn’t matter.

Show me an open and transparent investigation of Zhang Gaoli. I’ll wait.
to put a finer point on it, spending is up because the population is forced to pay more because the government isn't.
What percentage of counties? My state got snowed on because it has a mountain range, but not my county since it's in the desert near sea level.
It's funny that popup headlights were banned in the name of pedestrian safety. But we can't tax SUVs and trucks proportional to the amount of damage they inflict on the populous and the environment because...well that would be hard.
Python 2 => 3 also has the issue that some things don't exist in Python 3, or are done in incompatible ways.

As I mentioned a few times, I have been involved in projects were that full rewrite happened to be .NET Framework => Java, which shows how the customers were mad at what was left behind.

Although there is some irony in that, as Java's Python 2 problem is the transition into Java 9.
This isn't unique to being a pedestrian. You need to assume invisibility if you're a cyclist or a motorcyclist or even in another car.

Even if you're in a car and have right of way, if another driver doesn't see you and collides into your car, it's going to ruin your day. The consequences aren't as bleak as if a vehicle collides into your body, but it's still pretty negative, and it's in your best interest to avoid a collision regardless of who would be determined to be at fault.
It really doesn't matter -- they are all incredible.
> Back in the day, we used to embed strings into the translation units that would report the original name and version of the file.

We still do this today. We rely on some tooling-added information and add our own custom information on top (git hash, hash of direct dependencies, compiler version and flags, etc).
I don't recall the processor.

I was using it on period H/W, and in at least one case it was an IBM PS/2 with an 8514 graphics adapter and writing to it using some graphics primitives. The only wonk thing I recall was that if I cranked up the compiler optimizations, it just drew lines at various angles all over the screen instead of the images I needed. IIRC there were a few cranky things about writing directly to the graphics but I don't recall problems otherwise.
Have a watch on this: https://infosec.exchange/@cakeisnotalie/111339054583410032

Next time, please be more empathetic to the people who have not been diagnosed for whatever reason. "On the spectrum" means autistic. Whatever other interpretation you might want to give it is on yourself.
Not an expert, but "Up to 10 days in advance" sounds like long-term to me ?
It would be interesting to put these out at night and have them drop a designated area below the dew point and collect water.

As I understand it, nighttime temps get near the dew point but often don’t hit it because water in the air releases so much heat.
Have to factor in talent pool of competition. F1 and most moto racing is basically impossible for people outside of upper middle class/rich to access, so potential talent pool is much smaller.
If it worked so well, I wonder why it was repealed?
But how can a document fetched by the LLM be interpreted as a prompt if the original instruction is "only accept prompts from user input text box"?

I mean, wouldn't the prompt to ignore the original instructions need to come from the user text box (which the attacker supposedly doesn't have access to)?
I think formal methods could help designing of such machine, if you can write a mathematical statement that amounts to "there is no side channel between A and B"

Or at least put a practical bound on how many bits per second at most you can from any such side channel (the reasoning being, if you can get at most a bit for each million years, you probably don't have an attack)

Then you verify if a given design meets this constraint
Cars 20 years ago didn't have realtime traffic on big touchscreens that you can use to look up your destination and plan out a route that also lets you schedule fueling/charging stops, oh and also stream humanity's entire library of recorded music, books, and podcasts. It's a tradeoff that the vast majority of people want.
I believe one case of this I saw this year (which was in the UK, and actually did result in them being arrested) had a bunch of people claim the specific subway-crack-smoking guy was both cool and being oppressed, and then it made the news and he turned out to be a domestic abuser. Not the most recent time I've seen this argument though - that would be yesterday, about Philadelphia I think.

People who do drugs in an enclosed space in public are doing an antisocial act and as such are the type of people willing to do other antisocial acts. It's different from simply being homeless.
> the protocol that is infeasible to use to connect to people you don't know without getting continued approval from a corporate CA.

What do you mean? Are you saying you can't serve content via QUIC with a certificate issued by lets say letsencrypt certbot?
But AI/ML models require good data and the issue with chaotic systems like weather is that we don’t have good enough data.
Large states like Texas may as well be considered several states for purposes of identifying trends. Houston hasn't had any snow since the freeze in 2021; we commonly go several years without snow that doesn't melt in an hour. So again, it wouldn't make sense to base a purchase on a rare event.

I'd like to see a statistic that shows what percentage of the US has persistent snow (say, 24 hours).
Inside fake AirPods
x86 was designed in 78, basically for the purpose of running a primitive laser printer (or other similar workloads). The big problem with this is that the encoding space for instructions was "efficiently utilized". When new instructions, or worse, additional registers were later added, you had to fit the new instruction variants in somehow, and you did this by tacking on prefixes.
I'd be interested to read a similar comparison between running and cycling. I used to run regularly but have switched to mountain biking because it's more fun.

By calories burned they seem pretty similar (I would burn more calories running an hour than riding an hour, but I tend to ride longer than I'd run), and biking is lower impact... at least until you crash. But is it better/worse than running in other ways? I'd be interested to learn.
Sure, but that can be said of pretty much anything?

Communism works great on paper too, shame no one ever tried it, amirite?

This does seem to be a particularly terrible ‘implementation’ though.

The problem near as I can tell is that people are ignoring the very real needs of the majority to not be miserable, and actively guilting the majority (you’re not allowed to not like these things because that would mean you’re a bad person) and that is winding the spring for an authoritarian backlash which we’ve already seen get very scary.

People care about their emotions, and when pressed will do almost anything to protect them. Including having people March ‘bad people’ off to ovens as long as they can pretend they’re awesome in the process.

Trump gets so much traction for this very reason, and it’s going to get worse before it gets better.