skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Can they do this?

I mean, they can decide to only provide maintenance and software upgrades to the original buyer in the first year. That's their business decision and the market will decide whether this makes their product less alluring or not.

But if I buy something, it becomes my property and I can do whatever the hell I want to do with it. Or did I miss a memo?
How sure can you be that your lobby is successful? Can you like 'buy' a politician, effectively a legal bribe, or is it more nuanced?

In the EU, a lot of laws are effectively written or co-authored by companies, which saves the politicians and their staffs incredible amounts of time and expertise. This must be quite expensive, just to have the lawyers on payroll who are able to do that.
Do an NPV calculation on the value of a solid pension at current interest rates. It'll be worth over a million.
It works in the C world because everyone is super fixated on library compatibility, and the programs are expected to be rebuilt by the distribution when necessary. When an API is broken, this entails a new major version and installing both versions side by side until all maintained software is ported.
This doesn't happen often enough to be an issue - that's the perk of having a really mature ecosystem.
Let me know once they remove discovery features from the timeline, so I can actually see stuff from the people I am following.
To me, a creator is someone who creates something. Anything. Everybody who is not merely consuming is a creator.
More in depth analysis from a NGO lobbying for online privacy:
https://edri.org/our-work/eu-parliament-committee-rejects-ma...
170 MB seems like a lot. Aren't there less than 1,000 different states? My first naive idea would be to link to a static version of the gameboard further down the page like href="xo-------".
... unless it is them who does the scanning.

The "Mandatory government-issue SSL certificate" is still on the table.
Yes.

Django is to Rails as Flask is to Sinatra, imo.
Maybe if we work hard enough, we can have a big “can I use” table of rust dependencies which shows which versions of everything are available in which operating systems and what the package has been renamed to in each case. “Oh I could use rand but the latest version isn’t in gentoo so that would knock out 5% of my users.” Maintaining and stressing over that sounds like greeeaaaat fun. “Oh cool! An important new feature landed in rust stable. I can’t wait for 6 months to pass before the new rust compiler comes to Debian. Then another 6 months for my dependencies to use it. Then another 6 months before I can use it! Isn’t software great?”
> Thanks for the feedback. Which part wasn't clear ?

What you offer isn't clear (or good enough?). Sorry to be blunt but your work seems to be junior level so I wouldn't expect you to have a lot of experience. Which is ok! But that's not enticing to potential cofounders.

In a deal, most people want to get the most benefit from it while contributing what they can. So what you offer is just work, you are looking someone to partner with you to work on generic areas.

Now if one of your projects have some $5k MRR and you were willing to give part of it to bring a cofounder, then you would have plenty of people interested.

> I don't know maybe because "if you want to go fast, go alone; if you want to go far, go together?"

I can't go faster carrying someone. I guess most can't too.
Stephen Hawking lost the capacity to move because his ALS paralyzed him, not because his brain lacked the capacity to do so, come on this has to be the worst analogy of the year. Also no, driving systems are not LLMs. LLMs are large language models, no existing self driving system runs on a language model. And also, that's not what the word "tautology" means. "All bachelors are unmarried" is a tautology.
And yet, problems were constantly found and fixed and improved.

No two falcons were ever built exactly the same until Block 5 or so (and honestly, I'd be surprised if there weren't changes between rockets coming off the line now, but the changes are much smaller and more iterative, I would guess).

It's basically the software development process, just with hardware. Falcon 9 is a mature product at this point, so most of what's happening are maintenance changes.
> “You agree that, you will not sell or otherwise attempt to sell the Vehicle within the first year following your Vehicle’s delivery date,” without getting permission. Breaking the deal could result in your truck being remotely deactivated.

This passage seems to have been removed from the linked PDF [0].

Might have been related to:

"No Resellers; Discontinuation; Cancellation. Tesla and its affiliates sell cars directly to end-consumers, and we may unilaterally cancel any order that we believe has been made with a view toward resale of the Vehicle or that has otherwise been made in bad faith, and we’ll keep your Order Fee, Order Deposit and Transportation Fee."

"If you are in default, we may, after any legally required notice or waiting period: (i) do anything to protect our interest in the Vehicle, including repossessing the Vehicle using legally permitted means, (ii) locate and disable the Vehicle electronically using our remote dynamic vehicle connection
described in our Privacy Policy, [...]"

[0] https://www.tesla.com/configurator/api/v3/terms?locale=en_US...
I missing being able to go viral on TikTok.

I understand why it happened https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-platforms-cory-doctorow/

Looking forward to see where X takes it. Recently it has been an echo chamber of big news events.

Just before Elon took over, I was able to see more teachers posting STEM projects.

I hope it gets back to that.
People who create content that causes thumbs to swipe towards them and eyeballs to swivel in their direction.

If I can serve ads on your stuff, you are a content creator.
I believe Flutter doesn't (or didn't use to) - it rendered to canvas, and then in parallel built a hidden DOM structure so an accessibility tree could be derived and made available to screen readers.
Specifically in the digital space the DMA and DSA try (and will probably at least partially succeed) to break the plattform feudal rule and move their role more towards that of a public utility by restricting how they can use their market power.

That'll have a massive (I think positive) effect on the digital economy.
At its core, communism. Social justice is the means, not the ends.

Which is why so many of us are so skeptical of it.
I guess it's equivalent to `: <file` i.e. hooking up the stdin of the no-op command.
You cannot do whatever the hell you want with it, what is wrong with you?

You agree to a terms and service and if you violate them you will be punished by having your car blacklisted and blocked from superchargers, updates, service at Tesla dealerships, warranty void, etc. Accept it.
That’s hardly the only option, still…

Let’s assume we could kill off all the sociopaths, your point is?
You missed the memo of tesla being anti-consumer as hell
My guess is that they can, as it is a requirement for buying one..
Your current reply has a certain taste to it…
> (which usually means being of another economic class as well)

Class seems to be the determining factor, really. Europeans had a couple environmental advantages early on [0] that allowed them to monopolise the world's resources, which were never fairly redistributed.

The current bourgeois are bourgeois mostly because their parents were, much less because they had the advantage of being white when building their wealth. There are of course outliers and ethnicity does have an impact, but overall there is very little social mobility anyway.

[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1842.Guns_Germs_and_Stee...
We have devs that use AI assist, but it’s to automate the construction of the most mindless boilerplate or as a more advanced form of auto complete.

There is no AI that comes close to being able to design a new system or build a UI to satisfy a set of customer requirements.

These things just aren’t that smart, which is not surprising. They are really cool and do have legitimate uses but they are not going to replace programmers without at least one order of magnitude improvement, maybe more.
I am a Thinkpad fanboi, my oldest fully working one is around 14 years old. I am also super-impressed that my partner's 10 year old Macbook air is still doing fine. It's been abused to the point that it is a bit bent! The software is a bigger problem though...
Elon maximizing freedom
My 2018 15" MacBook Pro has been used daily (since 2018) and still works great. I have never had a single issue with it.

My M1 MacBook air has had a logic board replacement, and is currently getting a screen replacement because it shattered from the light pressure of my finger while adjusting the angle of the screen. Both of these issues seem to be very common across the internet.

Before someone chimes in saying that I closed the lid on something and cracked the screen. No, It cracked while the lid was open, when my finger touched the display. Also it is the inner actual LCD that cracked. The outer glass sheet has no damage at all.
On a parallel topic, low voltage current passing through steel framework in the ocean boosts coral growth:

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/coral-restorat...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrified_reef
It solves most supply chain attacks. Distro maintainers are users, not developers. They put the needs of a user first, and their work is reviewed during submission. If one of them goes rogue, the damage is usually caught before reaching the user and otherwise minimal, as the update is simply reverted by other maintainers and a different maintainer can take over their packages.
I use the new feature of creating a custom gpt and I keep adding new information ; files, structures etc by editing the gpt. It seems to work well.
Stop building apps. Just build WPAs.
Considering how they turn the games they do maintain into casinos, maybe that's for the best.
These are the most obvious fake comments I've ever seen, like are you serious?
Nice points. I do work from home right now remotely.

So I do have some extra time as I don't have to commute anywhere. Plus, at some point after 3-4 clients it won't be feasible to work alone, hiring and delegating tasks will be better.

I'm also thinking about how many clients can I take if I work full-time on Pentaclay. Maybe time and experience will say.
รถราการทำความเข้า
It seems to me the correct solution to price scalping is to raise prices.
That file has like, 60 lines. Calling it a "wall of HTML soup" is a bit disingenuous. But if you REALLY have that much aversion to code, there is no inherent reason why you couldn't split it even more.
CSS being miles away is again, just a matter of taste. No inherent reason why you could't use Tailwind for example.
Lobbying is just people or organizations making their case to politicians in a private way (e.g. meeting MP in their office) instead of a public way (e.g. putting an article to press).
The proof is in the pudding. AMD has excellent hardware and has had years now to get anything going. They didn't, and they don't so our best guess is, they won't.
In the movie, Thank You for Smoking, there is a great scene where the main actors are sitting in a restaurant, and there's a sign just behind them that says:

"Be thankful for your government, it's the best that money can buy"
Wow, EU Parliament did the right thing this time.

When I heard an interview with a Swedish EU politician, I thought it was a lost cause. She was completely blinded by the possibilities and saw no downside whatsoever.
Or use a split keyboard and put the mouse in between the two halves. Been doing it this way for years and it works great.
Perhaps worth noting that the only branch of EU which is directly elected is the parliament.
> ... which violate fundamental rights and stand no chance in court

Thankfully the EU still has the European Convention on Human Rights and an associated court which individuals can go to and sue their state: the European Court of Human Rights. This is unlike the European Court of Justice which cannot directly be seized by individuals.

That EU Convention on Human Rights contains the "right to privacy" (art. 8).

This may be what they meant by saying that this horrible text stood no chance in court: a deluge of individual going to to the EU Court of Human Rights invoking article 8.

Now I don't doubt that the sold outs and enemy of the EU states at the European Commission are going to come back with other horrible measures.

As a sidenote this whole "good cop (European Parliament) / bad cop (European Commission)" is a bit of a farce played on the EU people too.
In the beginning of the interview, tell them that it’s completely fine and expected to ask clarifying questions.
I don’t think the average person cares about privacy, sadly. “I have nothing to hide,” etc. The best argument I heard against this crazy policy (only heard recently during these hearings) was that many creators/sharers of this CSAM material is kids themselves! Young teens exploring their sexuality, swapping nudes with each other. So that means that if you’re scanning all messages and you come across one of these chats, instead of that conversation staying between the 2 teens (like it should), it’s getting scanned by the provider, flagged, uploaded upstream to some law enforcement center where god knows how many other people are going to be looking at it, only to realize that there was no abuse happening. And of course that comes with the risk of leaks/hacks/rogue employees spreading it even further. Completely insane!
Asking questions is a protocol violation???? What kind of interviews are you subjecting yourself to?
Other car manufacturers can (e.g., Mercedes, Ferrari), so is Tesla. Nothing new here really.
Although you can’t sell it for a year, you can still sell someone an option to buy it after a year has passed for some agreed upon price and mileage. Or maybe you can do a lease-to-own type deal.
Neither destroyers, frigates or aircraft carriers do what a battleship did - delivering projectiles the size of a human some 15 kilometres away in a ballistic arch with some precision.

We do have rocketry that is a lot more advanced than the Saturn V ever was - but it simply cannot, and does not do what the Saturn V did.
Change schools or move somewhere with better schools.

Unless you have a stay-at-home spouse and don't care about their socialization, homeschooling is an impractical fad that sabotages children's academic achievement and throws division of labor and specialization of trade to the wind under the mistaken presumption of ability brought on by Dunning-Kruger effect and a willful lack of comparison to the experiences of good schools.
I think ford did the same thing with the new GT
The fuel alone for the rocket costs $1M. $1.5M does not include profit.
Orbital refueling is a huge game changer. Interestingly, a formerly important politician (Senator Richard Shelby) allegedly hated the concept:

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/08/rocket-scientist-say...

There is another thing sets apart Starship from other launch systems: relatively wide availability/manufacturability of its fuel outside of Earth. You won't find kerosene or hypergols on Mars or Ganymedes, but methane can be produced fairly straightforwardly there.
PiArtFrame: Some Cool Fractals on Exhibition
Tell HN: "Ctrl+Shift+Alt+Win+L" opens LinkedIn if you're using Windows
To sell something you bought.
And just to make sure, note that the "Council of Europe" is a different (and non-EU) body than the Council of the European Union and European Council.
I wonder why, after all this time having to sit around and wait, they wouldn't attempt a reentry and water landing with 2nd stage.
> Developers tend to really undervalue this aspect of RoR.

I agree! I think maybe because the consistency only shows its value:

* over years

* in its absence (on other projects which aren't using rails)

Which means it is easy to miss.

I see the same thing with spring. Having constraints helps free you up to solve different kinds of problems. I lived through the "let's define everything from the ground up, picking all our libraries, etc" phase of Java (in the early 2000s; I remember Tapestry and Wicket and Struts and Expresso and XMLC). Would prefer to not do that again.

But coalescing on a particular framework is something that a community has to arrive at together. While I think that JavaScript, for example, would benefit from this, I don't know how to encourage it (other than by leaving comments on HN, maybe :) ).

And don't think that coalescing means there are no other frameworks. Java has a number, and Ruby does too (trailblazer is a rails++ , Hanami is a rethinking of MVC, Sinatra is like flask). But having one big player makes it easier to focus on higher order solutions.
So people seems to be confusing two different aspects when buying a Tesla truck. You are buying the physical truck and the "suscription" to use with Tesla services (supercharges, updated, warranty, etc).

Yes, you own the physical truck and you can do whatever you want with it. It's yours. You can destroy it, you can set it on fire, you can paint it as you want. And you can sell it before the year. But doing this last one (and some of the ones before) will break your agreement for the suscription/services part.

I do not support this idea, although I understand where it is coming from. Just explainign this because a few comments are saying "I don't own the truck?" and yes, you do, but you don't own access to their services forever.
I hate scalpers. I'm too busy doing HFT to deal with the problems they make.
The issue here is not brute-force vs optimized. It is over engineering. Why spend 10 minutes optimizing your program when you can spend two weeks over engineering it.
Nevertheless, they are still in one place at one time. If anything, my comparison overstates the danger, because Earth's surface is 2D and in space, many of those pieces will fly over or under you.
What you're missing is scientific reason for that. From scientific point of view we already sent the woman to space (just to test if there are any unexpected effects).

Sending a woman (or a person of color for that matter) to the moon has no scientific benefits unless the mission is framed as building a long-term colony there (where both men and women could participate) for example.

You enumerated several political reasons but no scientific ones as I understand. Hence my question.
Hugs to you brother. I am in exactly same boat.

The encapsulation coming with shadow DOM can be done in other ways (CSS modules) so light DOM seems a like saner approach... but then you lose the slots and they are must have for any composability.
Nearly all those in and around politics are vermin. Including Trump. We all know that, that's why we don't trust them.

What really would concern me more is if he starts referring to vast swathes of the electorate in such terms, or perhaps calling them a basket of deplorables.

I guess someone finds dictionaries difficult. So here you go.

Deplorable comes from the French word déplorer meaning "to give up as hopeless," meaning something is so bad, there is no hope of improvement.

So yeah we all complain about politicians needing to be removed, but one candidate says that at least 1/4 of the country are not hopeless and they're giving up on them. What other historical leaders gave up on a significant portion of their country????
Just answering myself after some reading today.

No, not really Because fission caused by free neutrons (which are
rare) is something different from more common "spontaneous"
radio-decay.

That does beg the question; what is the cause that we don't yet
understand, what lies behind little bits of the universe falling
apart?
Um... bio checks out?
There are 9 cells in the game that each can be empty, X, or O. So three states. That is 3^9 = 19683 maximum possible states of the game.

170MB seems like an awefull lot.
I am a developer, I know what dependencies I am pulling in my projects, what they do and I even read the code. What good will offloading this to my users do? They have to decide whether they trust my apps with all its dependencies, they can do that by reviewing the code of all deps transitively, but there is not much difference between a dependency from the distro repository and the dependency from crates.io.

> Ideally the distro ships with those dependencies

This is all good and well in the world where there is one single Linux distro, but usually you want to target all mainstream distros and macOS and Windows and what now. Depending on system packages becomes a brittle solution in these cases, since who knows which version of the necessary lib is packaged on this ancient Debian installation. If you depend on a newer version, then you are just forcing you users-developers to either spend time packaging it properly or just running `make install` and littering the system with untracked files. Honestly, stuff like `cargo` fixes this elegantly so I never have to think about it again.
I mean, you're using Zapier, you can connect to about 5000 services with it.
Inequalities didn't make sense to me. It's harder to understand than the delta-epsilon from the opening, and it doesn't feel like it translates back to a better understanding.

Convergence is presented as just a pattern. It doesn't have to be economic, but the example naturally suggests convergence, so that's ok.

But continuity and differentiability didn't make sense either. You don't "buy" continuity. There's no (increasing) value attached to smaller intervals, at least not in my understanding of it.
> `cargo vendor`

I had no idea \o/ Thanks!
Why would you want to continue using the "services" if you've sold the truck?
I have previously lived in the USA, I'm not sure why you assumed I have no experience of that.

In general I would expect someone who speaks the language of the country I live in now at roughly the same level I speak English to have a pretty accurate understanding of what is going on here. It would, frankly, be quite weird to speak the language and have no idea of what is happening here. Of course America is a special case because of how the internet is dominated by US media, commentary and content.
Anyone can write anything in a contract -- but a contract can not supersede the law. My question could be restated: if someone did sign this contract and then sold their car and Tesla deactivated the car would a court of competent jurisdiction strike that clause and compel Tesla to reactivate it? (Possibly finding tortious interference as well since the first buyer could not fulfill its contractual obligation of delivering a car to the second buyer.)
Migration to GitHub and GitHub Actions CI
You are being sarcastic right?

> The CPI measures perception of corruption due to the difficulty of measuring absolute levels of corruption

So the difference consists primarily in perception, the slickness of it all as you put it? How well we can hide corruption with a facade of legality and civility. Somehow the crude briefcase full of cash feels more honest and direct.
Do you mind explaining what you mean by "slot machine" in this context? I'm not a TikTok user, but I'm sometimes on Facebook and other "feed" sites, and I don't fully grasp how gambling comes in to play.
They are free to disagree with me. I will just break the products until I'm happy with them :)
C++ apps don't pull in that few dependencies. Take something modern that needs to talk over flatbuffs or protobuffs and maybe has a web ui based on emscripten? Then run ldd on it and recoil in horror. C++ dependency trees now often have a hundred or more items. Many of those are packaged with the OS, but that really shouldn't comfort you.
I can see quite a few people regretting buying such an original car (to put it in a non offensive way). It would be more fair to add a clause that doesn't let you resell it above a specific % over the original price.
Top Line Rider Tracks of 2021 [netart, 2021] [video]