skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's because no one advocates for that. When communists talk about ending private property, it's specifically about the means of production. Your GameBoy, as well as your car, your house, your bed, your computer, etc. are personal property and nobody wants to take that away from you.
I think you're just parroting things you've heard other people say. 3b1b's videos are universally agreed to be excellent, and it's baffling that you think it is a choice between watching them and using textbook and doing the exercises. Anyone with the intellectual capacity to study that sort of material is not going to have a hard time comprehending that they are intended to be complementary, as Grant Sanderson makes very clear at numerous points.
EU Official Hopes X Will Face "Peer Pressure" to Hire More Censors
In this case it is on income statement
AMD always launches impressive hardware specs. But they are way behind in software, which is more important than hardware
The biggest value is when you are emulating hardware that output to such a display. Often the designers of software (especially games) optimized their art for the display. Castlevania Symphony of the night is one of my more favored examples of this, look up a crt-lcd comparison

Aside from thqt, maybe artistic looks for new video...
Chicken and egg problem, less demand for transit and improving it if there's more people driving (and parking)
Ironic, considering the DOJ has labeled DJI products as a threat to national security.
> Over email though, I end up spending more time articulating what I'm confused about and trying to pre-empt possible replies because it feels more formal and interruptive

I would try to fix this first. You're putting constraints/feelings onto email that other people don't. Just fire off an email with your question(s). Unless you're emailing the CEO or something, just type your questions stream-of-consciousness and hit send. Don't be afraid of immediately sending a second email "oh I forgot this question too, thanks! $QUESTION"

Take a look at https://twitter.com/TechEmails and the emails from high-level executives. Most of them are super informal. Some of the older ones between Bill Gates and MS execs are barely more coherent than text messages between a couple HS freshmen. I'm not saying to start including emojis in your emails to your boss's boss's boss's boss, but an informal quick email won't be a career ender by any stretch.
"Hey Boss, I'm having a little trouble understanding this request, can you please elaborate a bit on what exactly you're looking for? I'd especially like clarification on X, Y, and Z. Thank you."

Offload the cognitive workload onto them.
Just like solving analytically integrals, (O,P)DEs require tremendous skill of pattern matching. You need to know all of the available tricks, and pick the one that seems to fit. You test it and it just works.

No wonder there is super-high barrier of entry. And that is why us mortals are just using numerical methods instead.
Sounds like an XY Problem:

- user wants to do X but doesn't know how

- they think that Y will work, and asks for help on Y

- others are confused because Y seems strange

https://xyproblem.info/
Did you read part of the article or none of it? You clearly didn't read all of it.
Then you are objectively wrong. Look at Grant Sanderson's explanation of introductory Linear Algebra. Very obviously it adds something good to complement the best paper textbooks on the subject.
Adulthood Is a Mirage
Ok so don't use computers? And if I do I must accept and condone any amount of inhumanity in business practices otherwise I'd be hypocritical?
For those who read to the end... Angular still uses XMLHttpRequest and not fetch, IIRC.

Funny, huh.
> If you dismiss any sentimental value, then it doesn't really matter, but real life is a lot messier than that.

Definitely true, but on the other hand, "sentimental value" seems to be the root cause of most societal housing problems. I don't want to speak with certainty, but I do wonder if society would achieve overall better outcomes if we shifted our mindset a bit.
I dunno. But thats a dual GPU product, so its not really 180GB.
I think the problem is, if you want to work remote you don’t care if other people work in the office or not. However, if you want to work in the office you really want others in the office as that is the purported main point of being there so one side is forcing the other into their desired working situation. This is exactly what the OP is describing, people above/below/around compelling RTO.
I assume "jQuery" here is being used as a metonym for the old frontend style where you would use the jQuery AJAX and DOM functions to query HTML fragments and swap them in. This is only really related to jQuery in that it used jQuery utility functions; under modern conditions you would just use fetch() and querySelector() etc to do the same thing.

It's true that the core concept of HTMX is very simple, and you could probably reimplement any given particular use case in a few lines. However, it is in fact a big advance over the manual HTML-fragment style, precisely because it abstracts over the particulars. Standardizing on a particular, good design is an important benefit even if the functionality of the code is easy.
HeyGen – AI Video Generator
I've been on both sides of this. Generally I am "passionate" about my work. I spend half my waking time doing it so I better have fun.

I've managed equally passionate teams. All I'd have to say most times is, "We gotta get this done." And somebody would jump up and say they would do it, because they saw the value of learning it, the value to the team, the value to the organization, or all three.

The last two places I have worked (A non-profit and a mission-based Linux company) have been completely different. Almost everybody was passionate only about keeping a roof over their heads (if that). It is a source of constant chuckles that I found more passion in a second tier ad-tech company than I do in mission-driven organizations.

I think companies have earned this though because of exactly what others have said in this thread. Companies have taken advantage of passion so that now. Say what you will about the ad-tech company they did retreats all around the world, gave us interesting swag and threw incredible parties. The mission driven organizations are like "Do it because you belieeeeeve."

[edited to remove nonsense]
But for that to work you have to actually be willing to buy at $100. So you can come along and try and buy my house for 2x the market rate, but then I can just sell it to you and you're screwed.

Of course in the real world there would need to be some way to prevent "predatory" offers (where the "buyer" can't or won't actually close the deal if you accept the offer) but that seems solvable to me. You may have to put down a non-refundable deposit or escrow the sale price, etc.
>You're coming up with a scarecrow and then tearing it down and pretending it's the real thing.

The real thing is a society with a government that takes care of these problems outside of a market...
~110-120 IQ response
> Have you looked at for instance Khan Academy's Grant Sanderson (aka 3Blue1Brown) Math videos? it's really apparent there is a LOT of room for improvement in pedagogy.

There is a study showing that you actually understand material better, if you use the most primitive methods: chalkboard and a lecture. Because you are forced to visualize the material yourself, instead of being presented with a ready-made animation.

It probably makes sense to use visual aids for students that just can't grasp the concept, but I believe this will only help in elementary math.
Dish laying off 500 workers after dismal Q3 results
Maybe it makes sense if you've seen the human suffering implications of prop 13
If things like slots are used, it isn't necessarily nasty coupling. But I agree this approach does make more a more complex tree structure than something you would see in a typical JSX/TSX file.

That said, I think the author's bigger point was that augmenting, rather than replacing/abstracting away basic web elements will win out long-term. Some degree nastier-looking coupling is a worthwhile trade over more opaquely-operating render libraries. I suspect augmented web components fail more gracefully too.
Nvidia unveils H200, its newest high-end chip for training AI models
I think GP was referring to their only being 30 AC-130s, not 30 rounds of ammunition for the 105mm howitzer.
"Enforcement is obviously a different matter"
You have to check "I'm not a Roper"! ;)

PS: Thank you bacchusracine!

Twillingate was a bit brighter with these Mrs. Roper wannabes for a pub crawl, complete with muumuus:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWCx3_GVu84
flywheels can go through charge and discharge cycles pretty much infinitely at least compared to batteries. Somebody posted a chart a chart on reddit recently comparing energy storage technologies based on how long they need to discharge for and how frequently https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/17r9q6s/oc...
A.K.A. "Tell me you have the bomb without telling me you have the bomb."

Technically, they probably didn't have to test it to know it worked. But for a nuclear weapon to be an effective deterrent you have to demonstrate it somehow. But you still need plausible deniability to abide by the world standards of peace-loving democracies /s
Didn't read the article, huh?
We'll know soon if Astra–the commercial space company–has a future
My office requires equipment to be tested by a recognized laboratory (UL/ETL/etc). Fire safety requirements are reasonable and easy to satisfy. What you describe is nonspecific reactionary FUD.
I thought about this as well but I think research activities and such might be qualitatively different, at least for now. Movies are merely looking to please our senses, on the other hand, researchers look for truths and facts about the world. It's okay to have movie visuals not based on reality, but it's usually not okay to have non-factual research.

Also, no one is going to force actors and movie studios to go full AI and those who wish can stay with the old paradigm. It will be up to customers to decide where their money goes. However, if AI allows for the same or higher quality and more creative freedom at lower costs, I'm pretty sure the old ways will get outcompeted.
I think there's a lot of value for classic server-side web applications rather than SPAs. That handles routing, state, etc. I'm personally a fan and hope that the server-based application renaissance happens as some predict.
Yeah if you lay in bed all day, sure...
I was just hoping that we can extract some useful patterns from reverse engineering the trained network
And they're using drones infinity more than they did before drones were invented
Tldr; it's a combination of wikipedia policies and practical execution; WP:SEALION lays it out in practical terms.

ArbComm and Administrators are by design incapable of blocking users based on disputes over page content. This is fine on paper, but it has resulted in the side effect that if an argument arises, the main thing that Wikipedia ends up policing is less the accuracy of what's being edited (because no authority on Wikipedia may comment on that) but rather the civility of the editors involved.

In practical terms, it's basically impossible to edit or comment on the site without breaking a policy somewhere - Wikipedia's massive list of policies and essays are self-contradicting, meaning that if you complain about a policy violation, a different editor can complain about you breaking another policy.

This means that should a discussion get to the point where administrators (let alone ArbComm) has to be involved, the default outcome is basically that both involved parties will get sanctioned; ArbComm and ANI closure notes have openly stated in the past that they've just given a page/topic ban (or worse) by community consensus to all editors involved because "it might put fresh editors on the page instead".

It's an issue further amplified by the Randy in Boise problem (aka the "fuck experts" policy), where a "sock" user can just behave in extremely polite and civil ways, yet says things that hold absolutely zero ground to the frustration of all involved. All with the goal of eventually escalating it to AN/I or ArbComm so that when their sock gets banned, at least the article is down an expert editor.

Wikipedia largely gets away with this policy on the basis that they'll accrue new editors with time anyway.
Soft how? For wanting to live in a house they own, and not wasting away hours on the highway, or to see their kids at dinner? I agree it is good to appreciate how good we have it compared to others, but that doesn't make our particular negative situation okay, when it doesn't have to be that way.
Is there any comparably complete framework that does not need any significant adjustments even when it's used by 1000s of developers building the same app?
Startups with Laser Beams: The Companies Trying to Ignite Fusion Energy
I'm aware, but I'd argue that in addition to the competitive moats described by Hamilton Helmer (7 powers guy) there is a real moat in unique technological expertise in the chip industry. E.g. the chip making machines that ASML makes or the 3nm chips that TSMC produces have reached a level of sophistication that will take 3+ years for competitors to replicate, thus granting them a sort of quasi monopoly for the foreseeable future.
Discussion from a similar article six days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38181408

There must be an ongoing PR push.
Steve's job is emphatically NOT to prioritize delivery of solutions for arbitrary or ill-formed requests from co-workers! Saying "yes" to one such request requires saying "no" to everything else, including strategic priorities and commitments. And it invites more of the same. An organization that ignores the need to respect each others' time is dysfunctional. An employee who insists on clarity, instead of allowing half-baked interrupts to derail the work they're already engaged in, may simply be defending their ability to do their job.
2023 State of AI Report from Retool
Why can't you store it at your desk? My biggest pet peeve in the office was the people storing personal items in the kitchen. I don't need to see your machine with (don't use) stickies on it or the random assortment of blender bases. I also don't need to see your dirty tupperware in the sink.
That should tell you more about the energy intensity of a long-haul 777 flight.
Thanks for the info. Can you check some other website on the .xyz domain, e.g. https://abc.xyz , or https://www.tusmo.xyz ?
Eliot was a genius. If you haven't read it yet, Middlemarch easily earns its claim to be one of the greatest novels ever.
based on MLPerf, google is further lagging behind, Intel is the only that is catching up a bit, but still.

AMD is trying to catch up too, so far Nvidia still remains to be the leader, a few years ahead.
Much like the US had weapons in Turkey (for many years, IDK if they still are), but those weapons were under US control. (Although if the combination on the safeties is still all 0s, that may be less than completely accurate.)
Perfect!

My favorite line of research involving this is using the trolley problem to get at hidden moral biases that we normally wouldn't admit to ourselves.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/given-the-choice-liber...
> I keep saying—if you want me to return to the office, give me an office. Or even a cubicle. Why even enforce a hot-desking setup when the space is 20% full? It makes no sense at all!

Cynically, it makes layoffs a lot more opaque. When everyone gets to express their individuality by sitting in an identical, constantly-shifting workspace; you can't "walk by" someone's desk and notice it's cleaned out and their gone.

I don't think that's the main reason (the main reason is trying to cheap out on office rent and ape corporate fads), but it's probably a happy added perk for those who are pushing these things.
$9M or I (don’t) walk!
As someone who did his fair share of project work across departments, first as resource and later as a manager type, people like Steve arw everywhere. And they are a pain to work with, have no real influence whatsoever. All they are is not enough of a nusiance to be delt with, which ultimately they will if their attics block the wrong people's project.

That being said, if I have to deal with the "command line" people by tellong them each and every step of the work they are supposed to do, more often than not I'm faster doing it myself. There are places for those people, places they actually provide a ton of value because strictly following procedure is paramount, things progress faster when people can get an assignment and everyone else can count a) the assigment being completed on time or b) everyone getting a heads if not.

Those other roles are tge easiest to automate, and by no means do they justify the salaries some people are expecting to be paid.
FBI Approved My Theory – Stephen Paddock Motive (Las Vegas Massacre)
Complaining about the phenomenon isn't doing anything about any of these 3 issues. There is a powerful economic incentive driving it, and lot of independent actors. Really all we're doing here is driving up our own blood pressure. People who operate serious bounty programs have been dealing with this effectively for over a decade.
Massive missed opportunity to call it "STARS on Demand"
I wonder what the growth rate of the mean of the second prime factor is? I guess I'd expect it to grow without bound, but maybe pretty slowly?
I've wondered about this for years.

Express was the default with Node for some years but it was mostly used for APIs to feed front ends. These days lots of people have switched to Fastify but again mostly for APIs.

There's really nothing fullstack in the JS world that can be compared to Rails, Laravel, or Django.

Current fullstack solutions (Next, Nuxt, SvelteKit, etc) in JS are trying to kludge front end components into the server which IMO is a mistake. And I say this as someone who has been doing mostly front end since the 90s.
NSFW! flagged!
I don't deny the possibility that there are long-term post viral health effects and covid is obviously a big possibility there, but I've said many times that I think a lot of the health issues that people are experiencing are from stress and anxiety. I say that as someone who has had near lifelong issues with them. When I was going through the experience of working for a company acquired by private equity, it was incredibly stressful to see rounds of layoffs and wondering when my number would come up (I really need my health insurance). When it actually did it was actually relieving and I found I was able to think a lot more clearly and able to learn things much more easily, though this process easily took a year and I'm probably still continuing to improve (through some real work) a few years later.

So while the virus is a real biological factor, I can't help but think that the mass stress event of the pandemic and all that came with it had enormous effects on its own.
One in five workers in the Netherlands struggling with burnout symptoms
A moment's verbal reflection can radically reduce the time wastage.

One time I told my producer that for each sentence in her email -- mostly questions -- each sentence translated to an HOUR of my time.

This is fine, I'm happy to work to answer her questions.

However, she was horrified :)

It's easy for people to talk or ask questions without considering the consequences!
To be clear, sure, that's surely the case. The REX encoding added an extra bit to the register field used by the movcr instructions, giving you 16. So... might as well.

Nonetheless the "official" means for adding state to an x86 is an MSR. And in particular there's no good reason for putting this in legacy spaces like CRs: CR8 is an interrupt control register, unrelated to the MMU control in CR0/2/3.

(In fact the proof of this is that within the decade, x86 interrupt handling needed to evolve in the direction of MSI's and x2apic, something that even the newly-expanded CR registers were completely inadequate to do. So we do that stuff in MSRs too.)
Yep. Doing Azure-related things is way easier in VS Code than other IDEs because so much deployment functionality is built in. It's still needlessly convoluted though.
This is amazing. Please share with the big projects which need it the most.. collabora and libreoffice. Also, a product which the world needs badly.. would be a software which would abstract git and present text to lawyers as regular word processor, but in the backend it's git for the win.
“Clickbait”
> it seems self-evident to me that books and videos are complementary

Can't speak for others but for me it is more about efficient utilization of time rather than complementing multiple learning methods.

I've found that time spent in learning math from videos have poor return of investment. That time is better spent re-reading a chapter or that thing that I couldn't fully understand the first time and doing more exercises.
Agree. I would fire such an employee on the first opportunity.
> For starters I would like to have a chatbot who knows the scientific literature in a certain field,

You can feed it with whatever you want. How much censoring (of what exactly?) happens, is up to you.

> Then I would like to be able to ask questions which are answered with pure scientific facts only,

That would demand a very deep level of understanding, which AIs today are not able to deliver.

> Without ever answering with "...this is not scientifically proven, but the consensus is..."

That would not be scientific. In the first place, to understand the scientific literature, one needs to evaluate them and rate their value and how reliable they are in the greater known picture. Just taken them blindly would be worthless. That would be just connecting the words and believing that this is science. That's what all LLM basically already do, and the reason why they lie/hallucinate.

And evaluating texts and putting them into a proper context is not censoring, if this is your impression.
Very large household-name companies often own or otherwise control significant amounts of commercial real estate, which sit on the company's balance sheet.

If commercial real estate in general loses value, the value of these assets is also reduced, which will eventually be reflected on their balance sheets.

Even in cases where the real estate is leased rather than owned, the future rents owned are liabilities that are also a part of the companies' financial reports. If the demand for commercial real estate goes down, they won't be able to fully offset liabilities by subletting or selling their commercial real estate, which will show up as losses, write offs or write downs.
This is the main issue for me with webcomponents, they are not SSR friendly.
I am old enough to remember when cubicles and offices were the norm. Cubicle companies studied and improved the cubicles spaces to make them more efficient using science. Yes they actually studied what would make us happier and more proficient at work.

Then came the stupid trend of organic seating. Cubicle’s ? Thing of the past they said, yet our productivity suffered. Great for sprints but quickly diminished due to constant distractions forcing engineers to invest in noise canceling headphones.

The WFH movement is because water flows downhill. We learned that we made the office an incredibly inefficient place to work, because we didn’t follow the science and threw away decades of research because of a new ‘fad’ that the CEO’s liked. Too bad CEO’s, I have been WFH ever since corporate America thought organic seating was cool.

I will never go back, in fact us programmers should unite and unionize to solidify this benefit before they try and take this away for good and make our jobs more difficult.
Is the limit on the speed on inference a memory bandwidth issue or compute?
To me the i sound is shorter for dice versus dies