skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Are you using Cloudfare DNS (1.1.1.1)?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36970702
Team Charters Are a Trap
> If a house is unlocked and you go in to prove it's unlocked, maybe leave a helpful note, you're still breaking in.

What jurisdiction? I would think this was just trespass.
They do also check a few other things - eg that you are registered to vote at the address you give, and they also use credit reference agencies to check you "exist" with the same name and address.

The face and passport thing is new and I'm not sure the traditional banks use it. There are some systems which ask for a video of you plus a photo of your passport (I think I used this for opening an account with Chase recently).

But there is a bit of a problem "bootstrapping" this, especially for recent immigrants who aren't registered to vote and don't have any credit records yet.
Related: ideas by Gwern to enhance AI dungeons with caching, yielding a novel form of choose-your-own-adventure games. https://gwern.net/cyoa
also some probably isn't good at using macros

because you can make that a single macro which kinda is a bit like variadics. Through it still is limited to some specific number of your size (typical 16 or 32).

Anyway not having varadic generics by itself is in most cases just a small inconvenience with limited benefits and there are many far more important priorities IMHO.

The main benefit for varadic generics is that they might unblock some other improvements on top of them.
What's shocking to me that producers were simply adding a lead colorant on purpose. I thought the challenge would be from some hard to avoid environmental pollution, or a complex chemical process going wrong. Nope, it's just lead paint.
The dilution of who's who-elitism one can easily measure by counting how many people there are in it per year (maybe you want to divide by the total population too).
I personally would never even think of denying a poor graduate from trying, however clumsily, to impress the girl he fancies with some unaffordable ring. Bad financial decision? Maybe. Story of beautiful romance? Absolutely.
I work at one at the aforementioned diamond mines in Canada and it is in fact a good place to work. Cold as shit but safety is the number one concern.
Yeah. Their perspective correct texture mapping did a perspective div only every 16 pixels drawn – in itself a considerable optimization with almost imperceptible loss in quality – but the big deal was that on the Pentium specifically, the integer pipeline could be almost perfectly cycle-optimized to process sixteen pixels in the time the FPU executed the next perspective division in parallel so the result was ready just as it was needed!
"Very much criminalized" is a matter of perspective. Getting caught first-time in non-violent drug crimes in the Czech Republic means you'll end up with a minimal sentence on probation without actual jail time.

In the US, your life would be ruined forever.

But yeah, legal consumption without legal supply (with quality control!) does not fully solve the problem.
Perhaps it would be better not to tell other people that the way they use a technology is "subpar".

Parent's wife is presumably a smart person who found a way to use technology in a way that benefits her, without knowing a lot more context, I think it's a bit silly to leap to the conclusion that she is "doing it wrong".
It looks cool, and I approve of most stuff that brings us closer to the cyberpunk world of my dreams but:

Starting at 699$ damn that's pricey considering phones are already stolen out of people's hands/off tables in busy cities, do they think a thief won't rip this off someone's shirt if they see it?

The display: pretty cool, but tracking seems a bit wobbly, I haven't seen a demo of it in bright sunlight and idk if it would do that well.

Chest mounted camera: I mean being able to hold up something and ask it questions is pretty cool, like identifying something, or getting the price of an item from a store vs online to make sure you're paying a good price, etc. Would be great for travelling.

The translation: maybe just demo but it's too slow and it doesn't show what happens when you walk through a crowded market or airport with tonnes of people speaking in diff languages, you bump into someone behind you and they say something in Spanish. How does it know to translate? You would, because you felt the bump, but the device didn't.

Hand gestures: these always suck and never work well. You always end up doing things you didn't intend unless you interact with it unnaturally/according to its quirks.

Asking it questions etc: our phones do this already with Siri/Google ass/Bixby. And I'm sure plenty upcoming as LLMs/elevenlabs style voices are used.

"Make me sound more excited" dystopian lmao.

"Catch me up": "Jane said to remember to get the report done for next week. Thomas and Aaron won't to know if you're still up for the movie tonight. BigBuns27 said thanks for railing me so hard last night big boi" yeah I want that potentially coming out at any random time during the day.

My conclusion: this is fluff, we already have powerhouses with long ass battery life in our pockets already. The real side of this is an accessory that lets us interact with our phones faster and more naturally. A chest mounted camera is fine but still not as good as glasses/contacts which can see what we see, very important because we'll usually be looking at something. Glasses/contacts can also provide silent HUD help, they're much easier to provide consistent display experience vs projecting from a moving torso to a moving hand.

I may be biased as someone who already wears glasses but damn was I sad when Google Glass got ridiculed (mostly by older gens) as if they'd continued & an improved version was out today I would 100% own one and develop whatever I could for it.

Being able to look at something in another language and have translations superimposed over, be walking around an unfamiliar place and have subtle direction hints provided, would be amazing. Combine with bone conduction speaker and some sort of subvocalisation system to ask questions/give commands and it would be absolute fire.

I don't want this weird kickstarter-esque device; I want Google Glass back ;~;
Origins of "Black Friday"
In reality even having a several "deal breakers" means you would need infinite options to find a match that doesn't have any of the so called deal breakers. Most guys don't get to pick from infinite, or even 10s of options. So you need to settle or stay single.
Having a loving person to share a personal history with is an advantage that's difficult to outweigh.
You know that you can look up "lead poisoning" and it effects, right? It's an entire thing with many studies into it and a well-understood mechanism of how it happens and so on? It tastes sweet and is a very useful material and the toxicity is delayed because it builds up in the body over time, especially through touch rather than consumption. The symptoms might also not be immediately noticeable, especially if malnutrition, parasites and other contaminants are also widespread.

If you want to get into a conspiracy of Western corporations trying to suppress a useful thing by spreading lies about it contrary to traditional wisdom, maybe try hemp/cannabis (no, not just for getting high: there are plenty of industrial uses hampered by the illegality of "marijuana"). Lead seems like a really bad hill to die on given that it's been known to have adverse health effects for over 2000 years (while continuously being used because it was so darn useful and contamination was often limited by how it was used for most of history).
Hate is irrational, and yet it does not justify murder.

Similarly, you can love w/o sabotaging the relationship by marrying, giving the other party a red button and a strong incentive to press it, effectively pushing the relationship out of balance.

Statistically, they will. And statistically, you'll be screwed.
You're right that the company and execs are behaving exactly as they should given the regulatory environment that existed since the 1980s. Namely, do not stand in the way of consolidation and only consider consumer prices for anti-Trust evaluations.

Unfortunately that's a fundamentally anti-capitalist way to go about things because the end result is what Google, and frankly all other dominant, publicly traded corporations are doing right now: profit by increasing rent-seeking and strangling competition rather than out-innovate (e.g 1, for perspective Google's cost of remaining the default search engine is about on par for their average R&D spend; in a healthy, thriving, innovative environment that wouldn't be the case).

The problem isn't Google per se, they're acting as expected. It's the regulatory capture of the judiciary and FTC from ignoring and/or dismantling the laws that would have prevented this environment from occurring in the first place. So we don't have a vibrant, diverse ecosystem anywhere, whether search, washing machines, publishing, defense contractors, etc.

Luckily the tide is turning with the Google trial on right now, and Amazon kicking off soon.

(1) https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/27/23934961/google-antitrus...
U&I
quickturnpcb.co.kr
Yeah it's not rigorous. The tragedy is that the organizations responsible for teaching math, like how to do it and how to understand things mathematically, for other purposes, would rather waste their time on rigor.

No problem with there being a rigorous math department. For mathematicians. But, quite literally, no one else cares. Mathematicians and everyone else are at crossed purposes, and the mathematicians are wrong to choose their purposes over their students' needs.

Uh... Not that I'm defending the previous poster. Just griping about rigor in general. Physical arguments for mathematical problems are rarely sound, and I'd assume that an undergraduate who thinks they have made a sound one is wrong until reading it to see.
YouTube may face criminal complaints in EU for using ad-block detection scripts
There is a couple of dubious quotes, the well documented fact that they cooked in it rather strongly implies that this belief wasn't widespread either.

It really seems like the climate change debate, only that the deniers won, and those who claim otherwise are getting silenced even as the effects are becoming obvious, and people desperately look for some explanation why people are getting increasingly ill, frail, weak, and dumb.
Switchblade: $170k Flying Car Has Taken Its First Flight
Better than iron, similar to high grade non vein based gold mines. You mine it the same way as gold but your profit margins are better.
FWIW Consumer Reports tests turmeric (and other spice) brands for heavy metals:

https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-safety/your-herb... ("Your Herbs and Spices Might Contain Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead")
The water table typically rises and falls with elevation. Depends on the kind of rock/soil in the area.
Marriage is well-known to work counter to that goal.

It destroys families.
hjjjjjj
Unless things have changed, if the return is only a single error value then it's possible to overlook capturing it.
I don't necessarily want to add or take away from your point, but I do want to note that I believe this is false:

> People around you by and large no longer think it's their duty to help.

GoFundMe raises about $650 million for medical costs each year[0]. That's just one little thing, I suppose, but there are many, many NGOs, charities, religious institutions and unaffiliated individuals providing personal care inside their communities and outside. There's plenty of care that /cannot be provided/ by these organisations, and was not provided in the past by private charities either. Neither could provide cancer treatment or cure a patient with major injuries from a car accident. That's a job for institutionalized healthcare.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoFundMe#Medical_fundraising
Ship Shape
You need to factor in the game theory implications: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.200...
I shouldn't need to read a 500page textbook to understand a class that a teacher has been 'teaching' for 20 years. He's there to give me an understanding of the subject. I have at least 5 classes each semester which are very technical and difficult, it's impossible for me to read a textbook on each while also reading a 20-30 page lab instruction each night, all written in a technical language which I barely understand. I can try but so many times constant consumption of this literature lead to burnout
A move to criminal law is certainly interesting development in this domain.
> But surely doing whatever works for you is OK?

Externality exists. The 40K$ diamond ring goes to some of the worse people in our society.
In short, it's not really a paradox because in the original joke, the assumption is that the first number to have nothing interesting about it is itself an interesting property. That assumption isn't true when you actually think about it...it's actually rather boring.
I would even say it's perfectly rational. Having someone who understands you and supports you, reliably by your side is a huge boost to your capacity to reason.
Poll: Is the rise of Htmx another episode of over-hyped JavaScript libraries?
I have the perception that everyone is suddenly (over-?)enthusiastic about HTMX.

People are touting it as the antidote to complex front-end toolchains and "bloated" frameworks like Angular and React.

Do you think that HTMX is worth the hype?
Yes, it offers a legit added value
No, it's a glorified/bastardized jQuery
Oof please don’t. Unless of course I can say that this very much offends me…
That's a good practical solution but ideally they should just let you copy the text instead of runnign some possibly error prone OCR on it.
In case you got lost in AMD's SKU stack, these are new SKUs in the previous generation (3rd gen EPYC; SP3 with 8x DDR4 and PCIe4) lineup.
> tungsten ring

You do realise that in the (admittedly unlikely) event of that needing to be cut off, you won't stand a chance?
Of course it's not an airplane. What gave you the impression I thought that?

I was saying the helium does a lot of the work, so I am not sure if I'd call it a fully "electric aircraft", it seems more like a "hybrid aircraft", to use modern terminology.
FWIW I think nightdive studios are planning on remaking that next (following their System Shock 1 remake)
Are build tools an anti-pattern? – Go Make Things
You are just wrong. There is a lot more that goes into teaching a subject better than 'generating a better textbook'. There are thousands of hours of work that need to happen to figure out how to make the subject make more sense. It is not a question of 'writing down known result sin a different order'. The subject needs to be reworked in its entirely. Advanced results need to be made elementary. Simple formulations of complex ideas need to be discovered, articulated, and developed into exercises. Out of every available model the best models need to be picked and refined and tested. Etc. And then you have to get everyone on board with the project!

Almost none of the work is 'rewriting the book.'
Pretty sure the main advantage is passing on your genetics.
Something similar is going on in fashion, where "fashion" brands continuously steal "low class" clothing.

This is where the trends for sweater pants, "ugly dad sneakers", puffer jackets, etc come from.

Balanciaga perfected this art, take something cheap and common that everybody uses, add a small quirk, slap a $1000 price on it and call it a day.
Or installing the coprocessor reseated a slightly-loose cable or created a better connection on a broken trace. The "boot step" could simply result in the system being warmer, which would make marginal connections like this behave differently.

To be sure, the author should remove and reinstall the coprocessor 10 times, testing after each. :)
I don’t believe that they seriously see fission as a solution, touting it is just a tactic for delaying real action on behalf of the fossil fuel industry.
Nonstandard analysis is one of those things that sounds nice in the abstract, but even though I first learned about it more than ten years ago, I have yet to see a worked didactic-level example of how you would, for example, obtain the derivative of sine using nonstandard analysis, or derive the natural logarithm.
It's a tongue-in-cheek title. The author proposes something akin to cognitive behavioral therapy, to voluntarily seek out 'offending' situations to learn to behave in disagreement mode instead of offended mode.
Show HN: Monetize your community with your AI Clone – join the beta
Most people have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 16 great grandparents, etc out to several generations before incest kids in. Many of those people stayed in place, but when you’re talking hundreds of thousands of people they aren’t all sedentary.

Even just within Africa there’s been a huge amount of migration recently.

Not all of this was even voluntarily. I have ancestors that trace back to Spanish Armada in 1588 getting stuck in England.

> Most current food is modern.

Only by the strictest interpretation of recipes. Most food is remixes of ancient staples like bread and cheese, or like tomatoes local plants that spread hundreds of years ago.

You could get a cheeseburger, as in ground beef topped with cheese served on a bun, going back to antiquity. Thomas Jefferson had "potatoes served in the French manner" at a White House dinner in 1802. Thin sliced potatoes boiled in oil may have first entered the western diet all the way back in 1623, but we don’t know what "papas fritas" means.

Staples like rice are obviously ancient and still make up a large part of peoples diets.
I really don't get offended by anything anymore.

I can get quite passionate in my discussions, but I don't take anything personally, and always welcome the opportunity for criticism. Though it is usually the ones who take offence who are the least able to criticize me.
Having children and marriage are independent concepts.

Marriage is a concept humanity made up, and in another era might have made sense.
The video won't be generated by AI, because there will no video.

The mid-game is personalised, conversational, interactive tutoring.

The end-game will be deciding how much humans need to know about any of this, because AI will be far better at 99% of it.

If this seems unlikely, consider that Cauchy, Gauss, Laplace, and so on were all super-elite 0.001%-ers in terms of ability.

No one knows whether AI will eventually have the creative ability to work at their level of insight.

Personalised training could select for prodigies, and - whatever we decide to do with them - we'd have more super-talents than we do now.

Currently a lot of talent is wasted because of political and economic inefficiencies.
The growth of the middle class in China has been staggering over the last 15 years or so and I do agree with your statements as a whole, but how do you think the looming recession especially with the housing and development industry of China will pair with a middle class that, as all middle classes do, will bear the brunt of this load. This is a fairly new middle class system which is in my opinion built upon a fragile foundation. China has curated every aspect of their economy to create such a class based on assumptions that are now beginning to fault as growth slows to a halt and the economy begins to suffer. I think that upper middle class luxuries, while still in demand, will not return to the former glory of pre-2020 for quite a while for this reason.
> You might as well bite the bullet accept that the people who say “You guys are dumb, just copy Zig’s type system” have a point, and shed some of the ivory tower dogma in exchange for a better language.

The fact that you call it "dogma" (and your other comments about Zig) suggests that you aren't going to be very open to changing your mind on this.

But as far as "the touted advantages" go, I've experienced them firsthand.

Being able to write generic code and know that if the code compiles in your library, it will compile for people who depend on it, is a pretty nice workflow. Being able to change that generic code and still be confident it will still compile for downstream users who download the new version is pretty nice too.

Being able to download some random dependency full of generic code, and to instantiate that code without having to dread reading mile-long call stacks that end with "foo.bar is not implemented in this function you didn't write" is pretty nice too.

(And yes, post-monomorphization errors can still happen in theory; I've never seen one happen in practice, certainly not with the frequency I saw the mile-long call stacks in C++.)

Those aren't some aesthetic details that language designers cling to out of some perfectionist desire to keep the language theoretically pure. It's part of what makes pulling dependencies especially painless in Rust.
Ask HN: What Are You Working On?
It could be at work (if you're willing to disclose that) or personal, or something else. It could be software, hardware, non tech things, relationships, anything. Would you like to share what you're working on?
And they were right imho. Having a clear notion of a subject is good for both physics and mathematics, but what's good for physics or engineering, is not enough for math, in math, you also need rigorous reasoning, or you'll fall into subtle mistakes.
Why not buy her a gold bar instead? They can be as expensive/ valuable as you like and she can see it as an investment. It can't be worn on a finger of course, but where I'm from, people only wear the engagement ring before their wedding.
Do you seriously think that healthy relationships can be bought with money?
Yeah, I agree with others, not good. Recommending inline CSS is just wrong.
On the contrary, in an intuitionistic setting you can use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_differential_geometr... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_infinitesimal_analysis which aren't nearly as easy to phrase classically. (Sure you can phrase things in terms of toposes, but that's just a roundabout way of saying that you're operating in a constructive setting.)
They are probably relating lived experience and we should listen.

The phrase isn’t “happy partners, happy life” and there is no “happy husband, happy life” equivalent that I’m aware of. It’s unbalanced, and if you have a partner that reciprocates, it must be confusing why the phrase is a problem. If you don’t, and you continually adhere to the phrase hoping they will until your health suffers, well we might reconsider our casual use of pithy sayings and their influence on children.

It’s clearly a divisive issue here but that usually means people have had a diversity of experiences around the topic.
Reading this while listening to "Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend"
Not rich at all given given this is the game Google is forcing everyone to play
https://archive.li/24Ors