skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
These "locks" might reduce theft, but not only they still happen, but you can also make money with a stolen phone. You can sell it for parts. An iPhone will annoy you about the replaced display, but the phone still works. You can transfer the old battery's controller to the new one so the phone doesn't know about the change. You can sell the shell of the phone, speakers, cameras, etc.

Maybe now I benefit from these Apple restrictions and annoyances, but I've been using expensive phones since before Apple started doing this and yet my phone was never stolen. I've cracked a few displays and killed a few batteries though.

What seems to help me is having some awareness of my surroundings. I live in a big city and every day I see people standing by the road waiting for a bus. Phones out, noise cancelling headphones, bikes passing right in from of them... I mean, it's not that hard for a snatcher to take their phone.
Loved, yet Lonely
Yeah, it's a horrible experience all around. CircleCI solved this problem like a decade ago, enabling SSH builds so you can troubleshoot straight up in the build itself, and once you've figured it out, just copy-paste the steps to your Makefile/CI config.

I don't understand how one could build a CI service so long time after CircleCI launched, and still not have that very same feature (or something similar).
I think this touches on an idea that isn't necessarily intuitive. People may not always gamble for the monetary winnings; that's just their excuse. It may be that people do so for the sensory input, and corresponding chemicals their brains release. It would make an interesting (albeit unethical) study: design a casino game where it's impossible to win. Would people still get addicted? I suspect they would.
This I think toes up to that saying - we've always done things this way so we'll continue to, even since OS X came out. These yearly releases are kind of drab for OS X I think. I want a huge focus on integration between my devices, I wish they'd go all in in icloud and make it where my stuff is just whatever device i'm on. Almost like how good they've made Bluetooth work on my airpod pro's work on whatever device I'm using.
Would you like to summarize it, perhaps? I skimmed the wiki on it but it doesn't seem like anything particularly novel? Just the commercialization of personal data.

Maybe the full book has more substance, but it's not a subject I find all that interesting (hence the don't care).
It's similar but to a different degree. The goal is a neutral profile.
International Database: World Population Estimates and Projections
We are blessed brothers from The Guardians of Age Mystery Redbrotherhood secret occult. The secret heart of this brotherhood offers all initiate members, growth, wealth, fame, power, prosperity and success in all areas of heart desires. We are here to liberate those who need wealth, riches, power, prosperity, protection and success in all ramifications. It does not involve the use of any human sacrifices, early personal death or hurting of loved ones. For more details contact us through the following Email: Redbrotherhood19@gmail.com and Phone: +2348162236155 or WhatsApp +2348162236155 Note: It's not a child's play, it's for those who are desperate and ready to make a change in their life. Above all it's FREE to

Теги вопроса:*How to join occult for money ritual
It’s a problem of stupidity and lack of education. If you take a 400,000 dollar loan on home equity to gamble your brain hasn’t developed correctly and you’re probably a risk to other people (drunk driving, bad driving, etc..). Anyways gambling shouldn’t be legal it’s too destructive to society. It needs to be much much more regulated (ie free cash flow has to be proved)
Yeah as others have pointed out, it probably wouldn't be possible to hide a TLI mission, so they'd probably be upfront about the mission instead, but this is fun enough science-fiction to think about that it is my headcanon now.
It is a good point that the final sentence could be taken negatively.

I wasn't trying to determine why any individual might choose such a path. I was thinking about the population of programmers and considering that the stereotypical traits associated with that population do seem to align with a set of traits that are conducive to hermit-like or even brotherhood-like lifestyles. I did choose negative-sounding stereotypical traits to highlight that fact (although introversion isn't necessarily negative).

I would even argue that my own experience is that the population of programmers on average tend towards self-reliance type mindsets (e.g. Henry David Thoreau) a little bit more than socially active mindsets. However, I personally know a few individuals who are social activist types and also programmers.

Even when you consider "brotherhoods" you can think of multiple reasons why someone might want to join up. Perhaps the person desires a community of like-minded activists. In fact, that is how many brotherhoods would grow after their establishment. Combating the "incursion" of these community building types in some traditions appears to be a feature (e.g. vows of silence). I remember watching a documentary on splits in these communities for this very reason. Some hermits felt that structured communities with explicit charters went against everything they were trying to do (usually some kind of mystic communion with God or similar). So you can imagine a bifurcation of such a community into those who wanted to be socially active communities and those who wanted just enough collaboration with others to allow them as much individual freedom as possible.

I don't believe that one of those groups was "positive" and the other "negative". But I do think it is worthwhile recognizing the difference in mindsets. You said "ideally also have others enmeshed in their questing too" - however, that is not a universal ideal. Be careful you aren't forcing yourself into spaces where that isn't the goal.
If we assume Google to backdoor Chrome, the whole IP protection talk is irrelevant. They could backdoor it without needing that.
Thanks for sharing this.. send me an email if you'd like.
preston@unlockedlabs.org
> They protect themselves and software houses from torrent-esque and crack-esque like solutions which can be easily found for everything that runs on Windows, including Office, not to mention the Windows OS itself and everything Android.

It's extremely easy to find pirated software for macOS, too. Let's not pretend that Windows is Skid Row and macOS is a pristine gated community.
<details> and <summary> are great, but animating them to slide open instead of "pop" is difficult to implement without JS when the contents are not a fixed height.

Sliding open guides the user that something has changed, improves the UX.

I've found that using the `open` attribute in CSS behaves differently across browsers as well. Sometimes it doesn't even work consistently in a single browser implementation.
That feels like wishful thinking. When I grew up I was told flying cars would be everywhere, since we could make planes and cars just fine! Logical next step, right?

Well... not exactly. The progress of technology has been inspiring, but besides the engineering side of things not much has really changed since the 8086 and Smalltalk days. We're still using computers with roughly the same architecture, limitations and scaling flaws. Nobody has reinvented the wheel (in my lifetime) to obsolete the old one.

I see a lot of flaws in this speculation, even given the benefit of "long term" doubt. For starters, this "created" AI is not a sovereign human; it is the property of whatever private interests built it. In that scenario, your AGI does not "win" the Nobel peace prize. The party that owns the AI would assume responsibility for the findings, for no reason other than the fact that the AI is their property. Even if they disowned it, the only responsible way to hold it accountable is to correlate the AI with it's creator. If you think AI won't be required to be "street legal" in such a future, you're not thinking hard enough.

...and then there's the technical angle. We straight-up cannot engineer a human body. We can try to replicate biological processes in a pragmatic, mechanical fashion, but we cannot 'build' the entirety of a human body. The only way to you to create an AI the way you've described is to destroy a human consciousness and replace it with AI, which is just about the pinnacle of human rights violations attainable. God forbid we make it that far, we now have to out-engineer biology in the same power profile as a human mind. It's a suicide mission in every sense of the word; tangible human lives would be lost in the pursuit of computational nihilism.
I would love it if we could move to thin-line thousands separators and middle dot for decimals [1].

I know it won't happen, but that would be amazing.

[1] https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/117982/central-...
There are coins of Half Dollar & Dollar in circulation.
Doesn't appear to load correctly in Safari.
Guess who gets blamed if your soldered SSD fails.
> What's the cause of all the flip flopping between Apple having to pay the bill or not?

The justice system. Basically going trough the various EU courts due to appeals.
Yes, bearish, I think ultimately Google will get their act together and focus on AI in the same way they focused on search in the early 2000s.
Oh for sure -- I'll take poker with buddies over a casino any night of the week.

It's funny, for whatever reason I don't mentally put "poker with friends" in the category of "gambling". I mean obviously it technically is -- no argument there -- but when I think of "gambling" I think of "potentially dangerous/addictive", and (hopefully) poker with friends isn't.

I'm also curious what GP thinks about whether poker with buddies is "lower class", or if it's only a casino thing. (Or gambling dens? Backroom tables?)
That cuts both ways, in my experience: a bug fix needs a metric boatload of cherry-pick, possibly across a bunch of repos, to fix any bugs. Centralization is great until it's not

We have gotten a lot of good mileage out of GitLab's include: feature <https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#include>, which for clarity absolutely carries this same hazard, but can mean centralized fixes are less onoz than trying to patch every active branch of every active repo's build scripts

I am also aware this cuts against the thrust of the thread about "build scripts should be locally executable," but until they (they: GitHub, they: GitLab) straighten out their runner binary to be sane, it is currently a better use of our engineering effort maintaining CI yaml than teaching devs how to run CI locally
I wasn't around for much of the 90s so that explains it.

Also Star Wars sucks imo. Never understood the appeal for that either other than boomer nostalgia.
It might not be too late
> That's not the case for the iphone.

You can definitely re-use or sell iPhone parts. Most of replacement parts shops have access to are not sold directly by Apple.

As mentioned in the article, some parts won't work and others will show warnings. And sometimes you can reprogram chips with small devices easily available from China, which essentially defeats Apple's hardware pairing.
< My experience (YMMV!) with AppleCare has always been stellar.

In my experience AppleCare repairs are stellar because they're never actually repairs. I've never once had them repair a phone/laptop/etc. Every single time they're like here's a new/refurb instance of the same phone(not that I'm complaining!). I'm hoping they're eventually refurbing the old one and reselling it, but I suspect they're often just tossed(ahem "recycled").
> Reading your comments, I get the impression that you are used to dealing with clients whose infrastructure management skills are lacking, and they are making a mess of things.

I mean, I worked at Datadog when this happened:
https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/engineering/2023-03-08-deep-d...

Multi-day outage because of an apt update.

Not the only one I've seen, and it's by no means the only issue that occurs with patching (extremely common that companies don't even know if they're patched for a given vuln).
This seems like it came from a newbie/inexperienced dev.

> substantially widen the pool of people who can work on web software codebases

This isn't a problem. There's already more people who can work on web software than there ever was.

> A second goal of HTML First is to make it more enjoyable and seamless to build web software

Subjective. If people enjoy it like this that is fine but these shouldn't be touted as principles everyone should follow.
This is fun in to theory and in simple examples, but show me a big project that applies this and how it made a difference.

There are some bold objectives at the start that would be wonderful, but I’m a bit disappointed by the advice. I really don’t see how these would work in anything other than very basic scenarios, even less how they would achieve the objectives.

I’m all for using the web platform to the max, and I’m absolutely for reducing complexity as much as possible, but I’m highly skeptical these principles will achieve that and I would not be surprised if it increases complexity by having multiple ways to do something.

With peace and love but I can’t see from this list if you actually put these principles to the test or you just assumed it will do what you hope it will.
The expiry problem is not much different to if someone deletes the package, so I’m not so concerned about that, but my main pain point is that if you’re developing Go code and your company decides to move Git provider (had this happen multiple times as companies grow, get acquired, etc) then you either have a mess of “replace” all over go.mod, or you have to point everything to a new location. It’s particularly annoying if you want to check out and build an older version of your code, because the changes to go.mod have to be cherry-picked, and by that time you’ve probably updated your dependency’s versions.
I don’t need to reply to all of these comments so I’ll just leave here that eugenics actually makes a lot of sense. The fact that we don’t sterilize people who have babies born that are addicted to meth etc. is mind boggling to me. It’s quite easy to sterilize people based on their evil intent and negligence and keep it separate from race/genocide stuff.
Even if there is something to "come after us", and it's intelligent, I've seen it argued that most if not all of the easy to get "advanced" resources (eg oil, some minerals) have been harvested. For a new civilization to rise and reach our levels again from scratch would be very difficult.

I haven't checked the veracity of that statement recently though, I'll see if I can't find it again.
Yes, if I am not mistaken, this is one of the books that tells which person was it.

"Undocumented Windows: A Programmers Guide to Reserved Microsoft Windows Api Functions (The Andrew Schulman Programming Series/Book and Disk"

https://www.amazon.com/-/de/dp/0201608340

Pity as SOM was much better alternative than COM, and OS/2 in general.

However that wasn't the only issue that nailed OS/2's destiny, higher hardware resources and lack of proper management direction from IBM side also played a big role.
Did someone send you Hexen though
Why the "bingo" bonus is not calculated automatically?
it's not about blame, it's about responsibility. "identity theft" implies that your identity is a thing that can be stolen from you, and you need to be responsible for preventing it from being stolen.

instutions should be respomsible for protecting themselves from fraud, they shouldn't need me to protect them from my identity being used in an unauthorized way.
3 copies. Always. Spread them out on different companies and technologies.
> It's truly wild just how much time, effort, and money the various companies spent smelling each others' farts back in the 90s.

I wouldn't say they stopped doing it in the 90s, personally.
To give an obvious example, it seems every generation re-discovers the concepts of encapsulation and abstraction every 5 years or so. Each generation thinks we’re so smart for having figured this out and how much easier software development becomes when your code has a clear purpose and interface.
batteries are not a natural resource though. I have no information how it works, but presumedly vendors lock in the devices to only work with certain types of batteries. Please correct me if I'm wrong in this case.
Reviews seem faked too
I'd read that as multiplication instead...

This is what you get from using inconsistent symbols for important functions, I would not be surprised at all if people died over '.' vs ',' in a piece of medical gear or avionics.

I'd use a completely new symbol before repurposing an old one. And in a way the '*' that computer languages tend to use for multiplication serves as a nice way to avoid mixups (as opposed to 'x').
My parents use these games and I started as a way to commiserate with them, because I have always played games but they only started using computers after I was already well and truly addicted to computers writ-large.

The Double U Casino used to have a team check-in, where you could send your team bonuses and they saw that you checked in with them. I know it sounds stupid, but this was a real way that I was connecting with my parents, and then they shut it down.

Incidentally the name of our team was Roman Catholicism, because most of the teams were full and this was one that was not full. Whoever started Roman Catholicism left the group, and eventually we became the admins of Roman Catholicism. It was a sad day for me as a part of my family when Roman Catholicism closed its doors.

I should call my folks! I think they still use the casino app, even without any money or social investment, they still enjoy it and I made sure they had nice tablets to use the app on. This is still working, even without the social aspect. It's still valuable to us, we game as a family, even if we're not always together.

Anyway, would you ban Roman Catholicism because they're believing in what is not really true? I think someone baited me into this position, I wouldn't even make this ridiculous argument except that all of this literally happened and I am not making any of it up. Casino app keeps family together, son calls his parents more often after they get disconnected by the oppressive dev team that shut it down. I'll be here all week, try the Clams Casino at the bar.
Like the other person said, it was for selling, not taking. Also, I think someone should have the power to keep the public safe, whether government, or a society-sponsored group.

The cops were undercover DEA with previous experience going underground in places like Colombia. They had been in rough places. Their focus was mainly hunting the big guys: suppliers. End-chain young people trying to make a quick buck is low yield, and if anything going after them distracts from the root of the problem and alerts the big guys.
Ask HN: Which sources cover AI developments without falling for the hype?
Popular press seems to do a bad job covering AI related developments. Twitter is too scattered and academic papers are too narrow.

So where do working professionals get seasoned and mature coverage of this space? What would be the AI equivalent of the Economist, AnandTech or Tom’s Hardware?
Batteries are not a natural resource though. I have no information how it works currently, but presumedly vendors lock in the devices to only work with certain types of batteries. Please correct me if I'm wrong in this case.
One can benefit from knowing fundamentals of an adjacent field, especially something as broadly applicable as machine learning.

- You might want to use some ML in the project you are assigned next month

- It can help collaborating with someone who tackles that aspect of a project

- Fundamental knowledge helps you understand the "AI" stuff being marketed to your manager

The "I don't need this adjacent field" mentality feels familiar from schools I went to: first I did system administration where my classmates didn't care about programming because they felt like they didn't understand it anyway and they would never need it (scripting, anyone?); then I switched to a software development school where, guess what, the kids couldn't care about networking and they'd never need it anyway. I don't understand it, to me it's both interesting, but more practically: fast-forward five years and the term devops became popular in job ads.

The article is 1500 words at a rough count. Average reading speed is 250wpm, but for studying something, let's assume half of that: 1500/125 = 12 minutes of your time. Perhaps you toy around with it a little, run the code samples, and spend two hours learning. That's not a huge time investment. Assuming this is a good starting guide in the first place.
Because someone is being paid, and someone is being given power/control that gets them paid.
Spack Package Manager v0.21.0
> Lambdas are rarely entirely standalone, they support a larger service or glue services together.

I wish that was the case in real life. Unfortunately, the trend I've been noticing is to run anything that's an API call in Lambda, and then chaining multiple Lambdas in order to process whatever is needed for that API call.
> how successful the policies have been.

I don't know how these “successful” policies are sustainable if they are not playing level field with the rest of EU.
Building a Marble Clock [video]
What Got Harder as MythBusters Got Bigger? [video]
Inline CSS is a total anti-pattern apart from the absolute most basic pages IMO.

There is no harm in a plain CSS file, and applying classes at the element level in the HTML.

If you put in-line CSS in the HTML is not only leads to severe duplication, but is also a maintenance nightmare if you want to change anything. It works fine if all you are changing is a colour or whatever, but often there are margins, paddings, letter spacings, font sizes etc etc which lead to quite a lot of extra crap in each element on your page. Repeating those all over each if your HTML files is a real burden. Just use a single CSS file with sensibly named classes - it doesn't need to be sass or anything, just plain CSS is fine.
>I'm afraid I'm going to be very unproductive on my side projects for a while

I infer that your main project is discovering things that may one day help you be more productive in your side projects.

It could be worse. Ben Eater was just trying to get his web browser working like he wanted...
Without any reference: that makes a lot of sense. We are essentially withdrawing stored sunshine from 100's of millions of years ago to re-use it today.
For me personally, a lot of the "urban" set designs feel very amateur. It feels and looks like the set in the Community Ham Girl episode.

#WhoIsGlipGlop
yeah a lot of assumptions were made that are inaccurate.

I agree that most developers are not AI developers... OP seems to be a bit out of touch with the general population and otherwise is assuming the world around them based on their own perception.
Given the Java, .NET, nodejs and C++ versions I get to use at work, I can relate to.
Sometimes, not even you yourself notice.
As another nod to GitLab's CI, it has sane autocomplete in the editor since the schema is mostly static. I'm not aware of any GitHub yaml tooling that downloads the descriptors(?) for any actions in use and with then allow autocomplete of its uses: or with: blocks
There was someone who did something similar with Tesco (UK Supermarket) Clubcard Points (a reward system which, I believe, essentially returns essentially 1% of your supermarket shopping spend in return for correlating shopping data with your demographics !)

In the early days (1997) of the system, there was a 'bonus' points points offer on Bananas, sufficient that the cost of the bananas was offset by the rewards. Although searching for the article, the benefit was only 8%, and the total reward was only about 25 GBP (about 40 USD at 1997 exchange rates)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/banana-economics-buy-942l...