skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Can't talk about your speech. If you want, you will improve if you really need that. Find coaches. At founder level they are a lot.

What I wanted to say is to take a lot of care to not define your self by your weaknesses. If you have several startups with other people you are already awesome.

Then consider that there is nothing bad with your speech. Instead there is something bad with the expectations. You are a founder so you set the expectations. Setting meetings with agenda, not improvise decisions, maybe your focus should be more in expectation management for meetings than improving your speech.

And last. Consider if there is really a fit. I probably will love working with you. Other people might not.

Look also for a fit. I will like to work with you. I like to have a meeting, reflect, and come to conclusions after several sort sessions. Other people (not looking at sales), tend to prefer (in my short experience) meetings without agendas and fast decision making. The CEO should bring versatility to the approach.

Long live to slow thinkers!
https://sive.rs/slow
Yes, Carplay is the correct way to implement this.
Tumblr users are rabidly against all the user-hostile stuff other large free sites do. I think they probably could have put the site behind a $1/mo paywall two years ago and people would have gone for it, if they changed nothing else. There's a general "we're fucked" atmosphere on the site because we all know they're trying to wring money out of their users and the enshittification has begun. It doesn't seem like anyone in charge understands their users.
> The irony is that they do care about what the user prefers.

I doubt it. They probably care about things that are easy to measure like "engagement with the feature". Doesn't matter if the user is spitting mad the whole time.
A bit tongue in cheek - I said "instantly destroy" because if the main selling point is an ai voice assistant, then people would just use what's already built into their phone/watch/airpods instead of paying 600$ if apple was to implement a better LLM for siri.

I'm skeptical of the usefulness of the hand projection vs a watch. And I think anyone who wants to bring a camera would be far better served by an iphone (or any phone).
you are not renting but paying for updates. The latest version when your subscription ends is what you are licensed for. I think it's after 1 year though.
I can read it, so it's not even (yet) shadowbanned.
The Onion circa 2012 was a trip. It's wild, given how much streaming video has grown in the decade since, just how much they left on the table abandoning such gems as Today Now, ONN News, Onion Talks (their devastating spoof of TED), and more.

And then there's OH1, with perhaps the most brilliantly surreal pop-culture satire of this century, Sex House.
Edge on first use after startup used to prompt for Microsoft login with an un-skippable modal pop-up, had to terminate the process and restart the app to bypass.
I don't think many megacorps are going to willingly abandon a fifth of the world's GDP and an even larger portion of the world's disposable income. They aren't going to leave that much money on the table.
most car USB ports are slow charging. my little power port convert provides fast charging. so not only do i get the extra speed, but the assurance that the USB isn't nefarious. which admittedly is probably a bit paranoid, but what if i'm not?!

i didn't even like having my phone data sunk to a my own personal car. it just made no logical sense on why that would be useful, so being me, i just assumed it was for nefarious purposes. people no longer get the benefit of the doubt of being lazy/incompetent. i immediately jump to the situation essentially being an attack vector.
I have a system pangolin (AMD 6800) and I can get 5-8 hours routinely. Daily driving for work and it’s been great.

My 6 year old oryx pro gets about 2 hours (on nvidia). It can game though… (steam is kinda amazing)

I really like matt screens which all these laptops have.
E-bikes have a speed cap so they don’t get classified as motorcycles, which would require insurance, registration, and extra licensing to use on public roads.

The problem with dynamic speed caps is that they fail in very dangerous ways. If you’re on a freeway but your GPS thinks you’re on a residential street, you’re suddenly going much slower than surrounding traffic.

A simpler solution would be to actually enforce traffic laws. It’s only a tiny fraction of drivers who endanger the public. The sooner we identify them and get them off the road, the safer we’ll be.
Look at it another way: the scarce resource is not the stuff to read (there's a literal ocean of that these days), but readers' eye balls / time / attention span & the money they care to spend.

So a DRM-encumbered or high-priced ebook, will (for most readers) just find itself lower on the pile of potential reading material.

Over time, that paywalled stuff will either be lost, or (popularity-wise) buried under free / open access material.
How is it not gambling? You put in something you need to buy with money to receive an item you can trade for money. Sounds awfully similar to me like you go to a casino, get some chips to wager and then later trade the remaining chips back for money. Regardless of whether the "official" law states it's gambling or not from a moral perspective they are pretty much identical.
I'm frequently surprised by what people think can't be mechanised and by extension automated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excavator
Way to steelman!
I don't work at Microsoft (anymore) and never worked on this project, but I can pretty confidently say it went like this...

Some exec: "Why are people quitting OneDrive?"
Some PM: "I don't know."
Some exec: "We should do an exit poll."

...time passes

Some exec: "Why are people quittin OneDrive?"
Some PM: "Those that answer say ____, but a lot of people don't answer the exit poll."
Some exec: "We should force them to answer"
Some PM: "Fine."

/scene
You're right. Steam also charges an atrociously high % of revenue, and yet people bitch endlessly when they have to use Epic Games Store or other marketplaces EVEN THOUGH we espouse so much about game developers being constantly fucked by big companies.
Work may change significantly soon.

Slack lets your conversation kinda go.

What happens when slack starts remembering tasks someone asked you to do... follows up with you to make sure you did it? And the person that originally asked you?

Right now you arrive at work and you have a few things to do, but your brain only remembers 1 of them, and barely at that. With AI it will have a few iterations on emails ready for you.

This is all possible right now with an LLM of today's caliber. He's not talking about general AI.
> If you’re lenient, you get targeted by fraudsters.

So in this scenario, it sounds like the fraudsters are the medical insurance companies, and the group being lenient are the regulators.

A place taking (on average) 1.2 seconds to review each claim shouldn't be in business.
How many years of experience, and how was the job search experience like ?
I'm anxiously watching two developing spaces for this reason:

1. Homomorphic Encryption

2. Self-Hosted AI Systems

Homomorphic encryption is the idea that you can perform ML operations on encrypted data -- so that the providers of powerful AI need not know precisely what data you have.

Self-Hosted AI is just what it sounds like -- what if your Alexa processed on-device, and never left your home? What if your mobile devices could "phone home" to it from wherever you were, using an encrypted tunnel?

The second point is possible today, but the issue is keeping your local model to pace with the cloud offerings.
It should have been a lock out tag out preventing it from moving, especially if it was having reliability issues.
From what I understand, the law school requirement is more useful than the bar exam. To use a CS analogy, the bar exam would involve questions like "write a Sieve of Eratosthenes using PDP-11 assembler," and you're expected to have the PDP-11 assembly manual fully memorized to be able to take it.
I see, so the 'correct' path would likely be something like: Incorporate in the US -> apply for an E-2 (appreciate this is a gross simplification).
Here's a few I've liked.

https://jezebel.com/rush-after-a-rape-on-campus-a-uva-alum-g...

https://jezebel.com/bearing-witness-to-the-rise-of-isis-the-...

https://jezebel.com/a-journey-into-the-righteous-risk-averse...

Should be a solid afternoon's reading I'll check back tomorrow maybe.
I would argue families prioritize sports over those activities even more so. I have direct family members that played D1 and professional sports, and it’s wild how high the level of commitment for non-pro track athletics has become since the 90’s-early 00’s.
Enforcement of the law with harsher penalties and a few speed-bumps would stop this. Seems more reasonable than some expensive, dystopian back-door in every car.
This existed before, just only for the wealthy. If Bob had that money in a Swiss private bank or distributed over a sprawling network of shell companies in the Carribean, it would be just as tough to get to.

Or for the less wealthy; Bob could have put it all in cash in some hole in the ground that he won't tell the location of. Realistically that's probably more stable of a value store than bitcoin; it's possible that it all gets stolen but given a good location and storage, much less likely than bitcoin dropping 70%. This has physical downsides the aforementioned options lack, hence the real options so far only having been for the wealthy.
Ah yes, a study made on six patients. Very science, fits the pattern.

But this alone invalidates the paper:

“AI relies on clinical imaging.1 In low-income countries, where specialist care may be lacking”

Have they been to a british hospital recently? Specialist care scarcity is fast approaching that of low income countries. The only option left is the poor man’s choice - chatbots.
I misunderstood you I guess. I thought you meant using an IDE to infer the types for untyped Python.
Series like Paradise PD are more trash and less politically edgy. I think you're right.
Every US company. European companies somehow have contractors without caste system.

Obviously there are different policies for internals and contractors, but fruits and pizza are for everyone in the office.
I will go against the grain here and feel bad for this. The staff will now disseminate to other outlets and further spread this infection they call 'journalism'. It was better to have all this toxic waste clustered into one easy to ignore spot.
weebo is about 100x more useful than this
It should be policy for the rental company to do this. On more than one occasion, I have received a car with a previous renter's personal data still in the system.
I think the lines between a practical philosophy, a religion, and a psychotherapy technique are pretty blurry. In ancient Greece and Rome, people would often identify with a philosophical school in the same way people identify with religions nowadays, choose them based on the practical benefits, and practice them as a lifestyle or religion (instead of just conceptual understanding).

I don't think it's mysterious or hard to predict where techniques from a philosophy or religion will be useful in real life, and where they will not... it's pretty easy to understand what they are, and how they apply. Modern therapy techniques like CBT, ACT, and Mindfulness therapy are pretty much just extracting these ancient ideas and practices in a systematic way, so they can study the effects clinically and actually be able to say in which real world context they are reliably useful.
I left early and left a lot of money on the table. If they carved out a space for people to get weird and creative, I'd come back, but otherwise I'll spend the rest of my life in the chaotic fun of startups.

Some people are built for the pirate ship, not the armada.
>Laura Bassett, Jezebel’s most recent editor-in-chief, who departed the site earlier this fall, implored people on X to hire the Jezebel staffers who were let go on Thursday: “My heart is with the entire Jez staff who just got laid off, including incredible abortion reporters at a time when the beat couldn’t be more relevant to national politics. Please hire them.”

This made me laugh really hard.

They lost their platform of hate and want another one, I was going to write about how Twitter had artificially boosted unpopular viewpoints and now that it's no longer full of bots and trolls they're out of places to spew hatred from.
"What comes next" is interesting as a problem formulation insofar as it encourages solution based thinking ("Here's the solution I think is next, for an problem still to be identified- other than it is what comes next.)
I'm fascinated by that description since it's the total opposite of my experience using it. I'd love to see what happened if you have a repo.
I'm simply intrigued at this point.
Instead... "After law school, candidates will spend 675 hours working under the supervision of an experienced attorney and create a portfolio of legal work that bar officials will grade as an alternative to the traditional bar exam."

You can still take the bar exam if you want.
Best is to use recommended despite a few niggles you might have. Second best is shareable.
On average everyone is the same. In reality everyone is very different. Science deals with averages. Believing in averages rather than one’s experience goes oft awry.
important healthcare decisions are often made while you are unconscious, and you just have to pay for whatever choice was made

This is a problem, but it's not a major driver of health care expenses. Emergency care is around 5% of total spending: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01287
> Photography was not allowed during WIRED’s visit to Humane, and the company didn’t provide WIRED a Pin to try.

Clearly very confident in their product.
Now it's time to play the fun game of "which politician has a spouse/sibling that owns a company that makes the stuff that is now illegal not to buy?"
And it's not even on topic, it's a complete nonsequitur. Also nobody's gleeful about his murders.
While an employee, I stashed 6 colored "p-bone" plastic trombones in google colors in various Google Cloud offices... (tokyo has blue, green in UK, etc)
Would you be making the same comment if this story was about an electrician that failed to shut off power before examining wiring? If not, why not?
Thank you!

XPATH in LOCATE stmts sounds like asking a disco dancer to moonwalk -- out of its era, but oddly fascinating to watch
Google Deep Mind just demonstrated that transformers don't generalize well outside their training set.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.00871

The question I have is, what if these agents are really good at doing things they learned about, but not in new things? How will that impact people's actions?

Will we end up with a static world of people doing only things the AI can do? A kind of 1999 Matrix stasis world of 'the best we can do now'?

What will happen to what Arthur Kessler called 'blue' thoughts in such an AI world?

Because IMO, the purpose of computers is to make models and see what happens. Test ideas in a powerful way via computation. If the AI can ONLY select existing models and not make news ones, or even prevent you from making new ones, then I don't see how these AI agents are anything but a step backwards.

Alan Kay gave a great talk called The Best Way to Predict the Future is to Invent it taht touches on some of these ideas.

https://youtu.be/Odmx-ScL-8o?si=PMhZyxTtNdwBumKj
Needs a new option in the list "Fuck You Microsoft". :)
I do not have faith in worker protection laws and safety culture in Korea.
Many do not spend the money to prevent similar deaths from happening again and I boycott several brands and brands owned by those groups.

2018:
https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.amp.asp?newsIdx=254...

2022:
https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1...

https://www.leftvoice.org/how-workers-and-socialists-are-res...
Why not pass a law to cut off the hands of speed violators? Would that not solve the problem?

Why invade the cars of every single person. Absurdly heavy-handed, and not necessary nor likely as effective at stopping people speeding on your street.

Narrow, targeted enforcement against violators of existing laws would suffice. Keep incrementally increasing the penalty until it works.
> In the next five years, this will change completely. You won’t have to use different apps for different tasks. You’ll simply tell your device, in everyday language, what you want to do.

This kind of thinking, to me, smacks of the kind of ignorant projections people used to make in the early 20th century about technology in the 21st century.

“Robotics will advance, so everyone will have their own personal robot assistant!” Nope, though we do have robots doing things that are commensurate with their cost and the value they provide.

“Advances in aviation mean everyone will have a flying car.” Nope again. Turns out the added utility of being able to fly directly to places vs the cost doesn’t trump a car in most cases, and when those cases don’t apply, airplanes are plenty economical.

“You’ll just tell your device what you want to do.” No again. In some cases this is useful (I already tell my device to remind me about something or to schedule some sort of event on my calendar, where the time to input far exceeds speaking it), but in most cases, I can do it faster myself with a good UI, or maybe I don’t want everyone around me hearing me blather into my phone.

It’s like, just imagine for a second what it would be like to have to dictate everything you do on your phone. It would be utterly exhausting.
How do you know everybody's needs?

Some people do need a car for work, healthcare, education, living with disabilities, or many other reasons not mentioned.
I agree that someone is buying and selling, what I mean is that it doesn't make sense to talk about healthcare recipients as participants in a market. Obviously firefighters purchase equipment and sell their labor to the government, but we don't refer to homeowners as buyers in a firefighting market. If we forced them to pay a fee after being saved from a fire, that wouldn't somehow constitute a market. The same is true for any other essential government service: we created socialized systems because they can't function as markets.

> You cannot buy a parking ticket

Exactly, just like you can't buy an unexpected medical bill. You still have to pay it though.

The fact that rich people sometimes choose to accept a parking ticket or choose to purchase citizenship in a more favorable tax environment is not evidence of a market, in fact it's the opposite. If 99% of "buyers" are forced to participate but have 0 decision-making power, and a handful of rich people are able to (sometimes) shop around, you are not describing a market.
The Greatest Shot In Television
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WoDQBhJCVQ
Curious about this too.

Like virtual mailboxes, the end result will surely be another subscription that indie developers have to pay for, providing a pointless phone number that goes straight to voicemail. Just to satisfy this requirement.
Anyone who thinks it's a wise financial decision to bet against fools is gonna lose a lot of money.
'Unreliable AI-Generated News' Websites (and Counting)
Remember, the insurance companies are HAPPY to pay higher prices (in fact they have forced many small ObGyn into more expensive hospital practice) as long as their competitors do too!

Health Insurance companies grow their bottom line by growing the topline cost of healthcare since they're margins are limited.
That's a terrible idea, and it requires you to have both a smart phone and to have it charged and working to get into your own car. An phone crash can leave you stranded.
Eclipses are extremely predictable, right? I don't think the problem is that the LLM has old data, the problem is that is wrong.
I used to work at Microsoft, so I can field this one: The answer is that they want to gather data about how to improve OneDrive so people continue to use it. The PM who owns OneDrive adoption probably has to talk to a slide in a regular status meeting, and someone up the chain keeps asking pointed questions about why the curve is less than exponential. The fact that they disabled the button until you pick an answer isn't malice, it's just shitty design. In time that PM will learn and grow.
I don't see anything in your comment that suggests the latest codes have backed from high fire resistance - which was the thrust of the comment you replied to (garage doors have become sturdier, and glass has low fire resistance)
>One of the insidious aspects of gambling is that people can delude themselves that they can actually get rich from it

Do you really think TCGs are not gambling? Guess people open MTG and Pokemon packs just for "fun" then.

Why would holo cards, foils, and mythic rares exist? Black Lotus is just a piece of cardboard after all.
The Internet Archive has many old issues of Nucleonics available. Here's the full article you reference:

"Power from the Atom - An Appraisal"

https://archive.org/details/sim_nucleonics_1951-02_8_2/page/...
"what did my wife just say to me 5 minutes ago?" is the most brilliant app idea I've seen (in recent memory.)
Ignoring the weird philosophical overtones that come with any libertarian treatise on economics, the fundamental reason why we should eliminate involuntary unemployment is because it is the imposition of taxes to provision government which creates unemployment in the first place.

It doesn't really matter if workers in a job guarantee program are productive in the sense of being profitable, because involuntary unemployment has a negative (not neutral) impact on productivity at an individual and a societal level.

Ensuring spending is at full employment levels through a job guarantee maintains a buffer stock of employed and employable labour, ready for work in either the public or private sector, or at the very least prevents intergenerational poverty cycles from forming due to the negative impacts of involuntary unemployment.
What's so controversial about Australian sushi?
I’m hopeful this is the right answer, but I’m not optimistic it is. AI seems more like the introduction of the assembly line for software workers, minus huge blockers for physical labor. It’s not there now, but at this rate? Not infeasible either
That's smart!
Unless you’re a character in an action movie, no. Your dying patient is going to be worse off when you get t-boned driving that aggressively or simply shaking them around. The primary limiting factor in a city are other vehicles, not speed, and not having a siren matters more there.
It most often seems to be the power management/charge/USB-C chip, with no particular pattern other than "playing a demanding game". Doesn't seem to matter whether plugged in or on battery, official charger or other USB-C charger or dock. I even had it happen to my own Steam Deck (while playing Minecraft of all things) which I sent into Valve and they replaced.

I haven't been able to investigate it too much but last I looked at the data sheet for that chip it seems like there's no way it should have a hole blown in it unless something was designed wrong.
They are using a rustc from August of 2022. If you installed that version, made a new project, and asked for the latest clap, it would not shock me at all if rustc were too old.

EDIT: from clap itself:

> We will support the last two minor Rust releases (MSRV, currently 1.70.0)

So yeah, 1.63.0 is going to be quite old.
> to receive an item you can later trade for money.

A person could reasonably argue can be exchanged vs primarily intended as a stand in for cash is important. If the items are intended as actual items people value then that's more defensible than say chips that only exist to be cashed out. (And I'm not familiar enough to know whether that's the case here)