skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think OpenAI isn’t going anywhere anytime soon and it will be integrated into lots of different applications and platforms but it’s going to be custom made like canva did. It’s gonna need more work because of how inaccurate it is, but their is great things for consumers to use, in terms of simplicity, obv if everything can just be done by typing prompts into a chat then why would companies spend billions a year building whatever— that is an issue— so it really depends but we would have to see what happens over the coming years.

I think it’s a bit too early to be bullish on openAI yet because beyond their gpt and image creator there isn’t much they are doing yet— yet being the keyword— so let’s see.
Zero Trust vs. Least Privilege
That was from Feb 2022, and hashrates have climbed since then, so there may well be a new record.
I have similar experience DX4 overclocked to 120 MHz vs. Pentium running on 75 MHz

Hint: Pentium FPU was faster
Not to argue with anything you said but just as an aside, the Bing habit you mention doesn't seem to be from the LLM itself, but from some censorship module that has been bolted in. In the first few days after release, it would get really confrontational (and sometimes emotional) with some users and this attracted bad press, so now it ends the conversation before getting into any remotely thorny issue. There's also another censorship module that sometimes deletes its output before it has finished.
In my 20 years at multiple companies I have rarely seen the Americans not try to create a diverse team. The other ones we all know on the other hand….
Back in the day and even today forums will throttle and captcha the search endpoint because it is ripe for abuse and computationally intensive.

But nobody bats an eye as we throw clouds of GPUs to provide a chatbot experience.
Those are trusts with assets and have no relationship to a record of credit events which is what the original post is about. Not to say that the SD laws aren't troubling - they just have little to with eachother.
Homie, the middle class is rapidly eroding and soon it will only be the hyper-rich and the impoverished, if we cannot make drastic changes to our socioeconomic policy. "Best off" is hardly a descriptor for the average college graduate that I know; Most everyone is struggling.
The trick to make CI in large codebases fast, or how to make any system fast, is to only test what’s changed.

In CI you only need to lint the files that have changed, or run the tests that depend on code that has changed etc.

This way the time it takes to execute the tests scales with the amount of changes, and not with the total amount of code.
The problem arises when the "how" is linked to a past thing. It can get wierd.

"How MJ has died" -> "MJ has died"

"How the US nuked Japan" -> "The US nuked Japan"
I see the problem a bit differently. Perhaps a society could function in a model like that. But we decided it's too burdensome and we ceded this responsibility to the government. In such a world, it is paradoxically more dangerous to come across some under-regulated niche, because our default assumption is that the government took care of the risk. It doesn't even cross your mind that you should be asking about lead in your turmeric.

This is sort of what happened with welfare too. For a long time, we depended on private charities to take care of the less fortunate. We decided the system sucked, so we established a government-operated safety net. But in this reality, it can be worse if you slip through the cracks of government programs. People around you by and large no longer think it's their duty to help.

Anyway, I wouldn't write it off as extremism. It's just we need to pick an option and stick to it. In a "nanny-state" world, you can't decide that you're not going to regulate food safety anymore and hope that the market will sort it out.
Except there is no such reliance on perfect information of all parties.

You're coming up with a scarecrow and then tearing it down and pretending it's the real thing.

The actual free market answer to these things is that if poisonous turmeric is such a big issue, it will be noticed (by some people dropping dead if nothing else) which will result in consumers prioritizing "knowing if the turmeric is poisonous", resulting in a "food safety rating industry" being created which either consumers or producers can fund in order to accurately determine the safety of the food.

We can see stuff like this happen all the time in the financial industry with ratings agencies, and we saw it prior to government based agencies that fullfil that role.

Branding was big in the 1800s as a response to precisely that sort of behavior.
> It used to be only that way, for everybody, and that's what's been lost. The masses are mindlessly consuming content of exactly zero value on what they believe is a computer ("My smartphone is a more powerful computer than the computer of the 70s/80/s/90s!").

I don't think this has been lost. I think there are more people than ever using computers as tools. But there are also people using computers as consumption device. And also people using computers as appliances (for example a smartphone through a very specific app, or my instant pot). At home I use my computer to code (can be seen either as tool if I'm doing something "useful", or as a hobby/practice), to watch movies (as a consumption devices), to organize my movie collection (kind of between tool and consumption device).
> Perhaps try studying a subject on a language you aren't fluent in and compare the experience using chatgtp vs traditional methods

Perhaps you should consider I have done that, instead of assuming things without knowledge of my experience and only worrying about repeatedly telling other people they are wrong about a subjective experience.

As you keep ignoring important points, including reliability which is paramount for the subject at hand, unfortunately I can no longer assume the conversation is happening in good faith.
Also, the free market requires the actual damage to materialise before it gets factored into the decision making of participants. E.g. climate change effects may eventually get factored into the energy markets, but by then, the damage would have been done.
I’m sorry to hear that. Loneliness is one of our biggest social problems in the world right now and tbh not much is being done about it. Technology is driving us more and more away from human interaction and it’s becoming harder to actual be around people and even if you are you could still be lonely.

I think you have to find solace in place you find joy and happiness. Even if it’s just going to the park and seeing people walk around. I know it’s not the same as being around people but I feel you. Growing up I never kept many friends and I when I really needed someone to talk too I didn’t have anyone to turn too, no lifetime friends. Even now at work, I don’t keep many friends just colleagues that I talk too at work and nothing more. I do and don’t regret not expanding my horizons, I do because obv I could’ve had someone to talk to when I need too and be around. I don’t because sometimes I realise that lots of people I thought could’ve been friends probs weren’t good friends, they would take more from me than I would give. So yeah.

I hope it gets better.
Graph Visualization in Python
i’ve argued for writing tools in technology fit for purpose. a lot of web development tools being written in javascript (and then typescript) was because web developers had to build their own tools, and typically these folks were extremely comfortable with ruby and/or javascript, so naturally they reached for them. some of these important tools can have massive speedup gains just by switching internal data structures and algorithms. in my opinion, every rewrite implicitly makes this switch but the importance of these decisions are subsumed by the detail of the implementation language.

prettier can be faster with a better algorithm. then maybe rust can help it take advantage of specific operating system improvements not naturally available to node. regardless, bravo and onwards with more rewrites!
> The main issue is that none of them match the long tail of formatting logic of prettier. I'm putting up a $10k bounty for any project written in Rust that passes > 95% of the prettier JavaScript tests.

95 % is not the "long tail" in my opinion. Maybe 100 % is too hard, but 95 % is rather low.
That's true. Just like people by Gucci, LV, D&G etc. I was in a Prada store once and they were selling an acrylic keychain for $800. There was nothing making the chain better than any other chain except you could show off your Prada chain and I guess hope other people would know you had money to blow.
Question is are they going to still harvest data? No point paying if they will still do exactly the same thing?
The marine mining ships I linked work in Africa, I've worked in several types of mines, I've had a career as an exploration geophysicist, and I worked on a resource intelligence mapping project that took me to mines across the globe.

There are mines I wouldn't work in, there are many mines I'd have no issue working in.

Which mines have you you worked in and what was your role?
Understood to be more efficiently dealt with, yes.
I don't really understand this. If you pay me to store your car in my garage, and it's stolen, who is a victim of car theft?
> and you need to be responsible for preventing it from being stolen

It doesn't imply this second bit.
Didn't some well known AI researcher create a compact version of Whisper based on C++ which was posted here some time ago?
I think right now their is too many mundane things— just ppl playing around— whilst you have a few big gpts like canva etc.

It’s still nothing major.
thank you ! i am not sure how i can mark this as a dupe ?
A good chunk of code being written today is machine microcode that's been abstracted into opcode then abstracted into an OS that runs code written in C/C++ compiled into an executable pretending to be another machine which executes its own bytecode interpreted from JavaScript code that was transpiled from TypeScript.

Not sure how many more levels of abstraction you'd want.
> Occasionally it works for people in developing countries is, in my opinion, a terrible argument for allowing such behavior.

I think the point GP was raising isn't that it's ok, but that it's part of a wider problem and isn't just happening because people are stupid. It makes sense for them because of how the world economy is currently set up. Saying "hey will you just stop please" won't change that fact. Exactly the same thing is true for spam.
familiarity. and rust seems to be winning the war for web development tooling, at the moment. zig (by way of bun) may make a good stand if bun were to produce such tools too, as standalone. it’s a high barrier if bun has to be adopted wholesale in order to have a pretty printer.
Why even bother with these when you could go to many casino web pages and just play in demo mode. With minimal if no deposit at all...
I’m currently reading:

The art of explanation by Ros Atkins.

Lovely book.
It's not event dockerized but running natively. Only some runners are dockerized (using Docker in Docker).
The game is Worms 2.
"The Missing Pirate Manual" for Amazonians
From what I understand it's moreso nixpkgs maintenance policies by default significantly reducing the use you can get from nix' pretty solid dependency resolution.

Basically nixpkgs' maintenance policy is that only one version of a package should exist in their repositories. This being intended to reduce maintenance overhead since the nix package manager can freely switch package versions based on the nix channel (read: git branch or commit that nixpkgs is on).

The problem is that unless you meticulously start version pinning all your dependencies, your tooling will always run on the absolute latest version available, regardless of major/minor updates on either stable or unstable. Which can obviously cause problems.

It requires an extra step of care, one not particularly helped by the fact that actual version pinning for an individual package is done by the nixpkgs channel, rather than specifying the desired semver spec so unless you know beforehand what version is at which commit, it probably won't be helpful when it ends up rendering the OS unbootable (not to mention the questionable use in manually typing over git commit hashes but I digress on that).
You can buy lots of "quantum radiation remover" and "negative ion quantum shield" products which purport to create negative ions and shield you from radiation on all platforms. Most of them do actually generate ions if you measure air around them with a legitimate calibrated ionometer. But of course, that takes energy. Where is a rock or a sticker going to obtain the energy to constantly ionize the air around it? Radioactivity, of course. Most of them are radioactive. And not the fun kind of radiation, not like, microwaves. No, it's the full range of inherent radioactivity the world of unstable nuclides can provide! And people plaster these on their clothing and wear them as amulets all day.

I don't know how people get away with this.
The assumption of perfect information is still useful as long state actors maintain market conditions for that.

Bangladesh example: Consumers didn't know about lead in turmeric. After the information campaign consumers know about lead in turmeric but not whether a specific seller offers lead-free turmeric. After the raids consumers know that they can usually trust turmeric to be lead-free.

The assumption of perfectly rational actors is not so useful.

However there's another solution. State actors should control confusopoly. That's a lot more difficult, but if the market is not too complex, one can assume consumers are mostly rational.

In other words: in reality the assumptions are not assumptions but preconditions for a free market.
Tinnitus Sound Masking with iOS Background Sounds
> The point is that many people see just the headline, and from the headline they will only remember that turmeric kills people, and some of them will start avoiding turmeric due to this.

I think until there is drastic action on behalf of India,
there should be a ban on import of turmeric or products containing turmeric.
Or at least as consumers we should avoid turmeric made in India.
Yes, it counts. If you look at most modern traditions, 90% of them are less than 100-150 years old.

Christmas today looks nothing like Christmas in 1900, across the world.

Most of the foods today (and I'm not talking about fast food) were invented in the same period. At least their modern incarnations, sometimes they have really old names but the old versions had very little in common with the current food.
Why IBX and Why Lazarus (2011)
I found the YouTube one to be really bad for my voice and the way I speak - Whisper does it perfectly (using the large dataset).

English is my second language, and I mumble.
It is not NaCl, corrosion might not be an issue. I would call it open circuit water cooling, this thing is just a solid state evaporator. Anyway, as sibling comment said, you don't want the moisture anywhere near your datacenter, and runtime of 400 minutes doesn't sound like production ready product.
Maybe it could make sense for burst usage patterns, but standard water-cooling or connecting huge metal blocks seems to be simpler solution. This one could compete at best with liquid nitrogen.
> it would get really confrontational (and sometimes emotional) with some users

Nitpick: it was trained to respond with emotional responses by the safety people involved. It wasn't getting emotional itself!
Julian Assange is in the worlds most notorious torture palace, currently being chemically lobotomized.

And the NSA's violations of human rights at massive scale fare outpaces anything China can do. Your whataboutism of China is noted. Americans fail consistently to take responsibility for their nations heinous and vile human rights abuses, all the while calling out 'other nations' from a position of moral authority that is just fallacious.
I really dislike base-10 tricks. They are just cute, rarely have any deeper significance.
And since most connectors use gold plated pins and lead free solder has silver in it, don’t buy electronics..
> EDIT: here's a short nail biter for you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qt8-5Vx1HA

That was the most stressful video I have seen in a long time.
Or, better still, just remove prettier and free yourself to write more expressive code again.
I'm fairly sure that if someone is strongly against astrology and irrationality, they're probably against religion, too :-)
Sure, a company milking its customer with a Pro laptop starting with 8GB of RAM to save at best 20$ per unit is willing to pay up to a million dollar of gear "just because".
No no no, totally unnecessary.
Apple apologists should really listen to themselves, like seriously.
> if anyone can do whatever they want with my device, then nobody is deterred from stealing it.

did i say "anyone" should be able to change components? i didnt say anybody should be able to change components.

> If you want a hackable device, get something else.

iphone is a device made by human, iphone is already hackable (case in point, iphone usb-c mod or headphone jack mod). it's just that apple's lawyers would very much not have that.

you just throw words like public key cryptography like it's an axiom but the tool serves its purpose as much as it's useful to us. you not caring about repairability doesn't matter, you're not apple anyway. people who got told their iphone cannot be recovered by apple but did get their data back thru 3rd party, does. (spoiler: it's because this means apple lied about their product)
I got a math coprocessor relatively early for my 386SX20 - I wanted to use 3D Studio, the killer app for math processors back in the day! The vast majority of games simply used integer math and didn't require, or could take an advantage from a coprocessor, but I have no idea what was going on in the article. In the early 90s, the only games I can remember that could optionally leverage a coprocessor were the Falcon 3.0 family of simulators.
The [artificial] scarcity and [unjustifiably] high price are properties of almost all luxury goods. And those are exactly what makes them (watches, handbags, diamonds etc.) so desirable to many.

I fully agree that spending two months' gross salary on an engagement ring is way too much though, and I would never ever get into debt for that. But, similarly as I enjoy wearing a relatively useless but expensive watch daily, I didn't mind dropping approx. 2/3 of a month's net salary on my fiancé's diamond engagement ring, which she got to choose and now cherishes and admires every day.
The 4.561 billion human beings in Asia whose human rights are violated every single day by the NSA and GCHQ: just one set. (Pine Gap, yo.)

The millions of Iraqi citizens who perished during the illegal invasion and destruction of Iraq by a criminal coalition guilty of immense war crimes and crimes against humanity: another set.

The Syrian people, whose sovereign resources are being intentionally denied by an invading, imperial force, such that they cannot rebuild their nation.

The children of Yemen, being genocided on behalf of a totalitarian-authoritarian fascist dictatorship by the repressive Western military apparatus controlled out of Westminster and Washington, DC.

The continent of Africa and the extant interference and meddling that still occur in their democracies by 'our' intelligence agencies, protected by the legal machinations of UK's sovereignty and its operation of a regime of repression in the form of immense denial of human rights at scale.

See also: the UK's own local and immensely repressive surveillance state.
My wife likes the color blue. So the rocks on the engagement ring I got her has a mix of Topaz and Sapphire.

Also, it only cost about 25% of my salary at that time. Spending 200% monthly salary on a ring makes absolutely no sense.
Is this going to be a race? Multiple people implementing it in parallel and one claims the prize?
The Australian government can 'advise' the sovereign all they want - but the sovereign still has the right to ignore that advice.

And, it frequently does ignore that advise - see for example the cases of Witnesses J, K, L, M .. whose trials in a Secret Star Court received no civilian oversight on the basis of the national security regime ..

Convention and legality are two entirely different things. Australians cannot call for an investigation into their own military - they can only ask that Parliament advise the sovereign to allow it.

> Australian governments when they use this kind of legislation to hide responsibility.

.. use the 'cover' of the Sovereign to do so.
We have not, simply for legal reasons. The Wine folk are wizards, though.
The NSA is absolutely un-democratic, and when its tentacles spread: this kills the democracy.

One cannot have a free and democratic society with organizations such as the NSA.
SVG viewBox
The supply and demand curve doesn't always cross with imperfect information. A lot of free market presuppositions fail actually. This is accepted by many contemporary economists. Samuel Bowles on Mindscape podcast was an interesting high level discussion
For me, it was the illegal invasion of Iraq and cold-blooded murder of 5% of its population.

That burst the "American Dream" bubble for me, cold and hard. I came to see the USA for what it really is - a military junta masquerading as a republic, engaged in wide scale repression of human rights, and indeed human beings as a whole, at immense scales.

Subsequent human rights violations, the existence of the utterly vile NSA, the treatment of Julian Assange - these events have merely added another layer to the shit-cake that is the USA's repressive regime, today.

>thousands

Millions.
I've always found it fascinating that companies that makes specialized hardware devices like this lean so hard into proprietary software, as if that's the thing that gives them the edge on the competition.

If anything the hardware is the hard part to copy and open source drivers could do nothing but benefit them and ensure wide platform compatibility and longevity, and yet so many companies like this insist on closing things up and forcing hackers to reverse engineer everything. It's bizarre logic to me.
The new thing was Trump pretty successfully fighting off efforts to examine his finances for his entire term.
Unless people explicitly ask for high or at least medium precision in the code, they probably will get FP16 floats on a mobile chip, which is totally fine for most fragment shader calculations.
Part of the comparison here is that the alternatives are both cheaper and practically better. So it doesn't apply so much unless you chose to buy, say, clothes from brand A that were indistinguishable from brand B to normal people but cost more and involved more child labour. Or if apple made a special phone you could buy that looked the same but cost 10x as much because it also includes payments to warlords.

> Call this irrational, but the amount of personal responsibility one should feel for some injustice they benefit from, among with a billion or two other people, is an unsolved philosophical and ethical problem.

I don't think it's unsolved, it's just unsolved in a way that makes people feel ok. The reality is that we regularly choose minor improvements to our lives or even just spend through laziness at a cost of other people's lives.
you may have to force approve edits by the formatter then, since they’re pretty annoying when included in changes for code review.
Build in release, optimize for size. LLVM-MOS produces some remarkably good assembly. Rust is still missing some optimizations though, since rust-mos is a few years out of date.
Some of the arguments in this are so flawed. Still, I pondered this point of view.