skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Just note that any organization is quite complex, and surely at different times different people in an organization have different purposes, and they may have different understandings if they share the same purposes. So it is pretty common that everybody's actions, understanding, and purposes are not coordinated.

The purpose of an organization is never simple. From Hebert Simon's <Administrative Behavior>:

> The survival and success of organizations depend on their providing sufficient incentives to their members to secure the contributions that are needed to carry out the organizations' tasks
ahh, ignore that noise. They don't realize that we all together raise awareness on habits and habit tracking and thus we all benefit from each others' work!

keep it up!
No cafe would allow an adult to sexually groom a child while sitting at a table.
Can you even call it a party then?

/jk
Why is communication being compared to physical access? E2EE protects my conversations from being "heard" by others. If I was walking at the park talking to my friend, the government wouldn't complain that there's not a microphone nearby. Nobody else is physically able to listen to that conversation, and that's perfectly common and acceptable.
From my experience there is a real issue of C and C++ developers treating undefined behavior as an error. Yet you can't reason around undefined behavior, you can't catch it at runtime and there are more ways how UB is meaningfully different than an error or bug in the program logic. I can see how such a post could inadvertently reinforce such a mindset. No clue if the person you are responding to had that in mind.
Humor me. Recommend a filter for me to get me started. It doesn't even have to be that good and if I'm disappointed I won't be able to reply anyway.
Ask HN: What is the purpose of status page if it is wrong – OpenAI
According to numerous messages on Twitter and on my own experience something is still down when it comes to OpenAI (ChatGPT). And yet their status page says that all is fine.

https://status.openai.com

Why is that so?
*reported collisions. There will no doubt be a lot more minor bumps that haven’t been reported to one of the relevant agencies.
Is there another article, where we can read the content?
Or can somebody summarize the article?
I have no FT subscription :(
Edward Snowden leaks happened in 2013.
You're comparing paper cuts to sexual abuse. Don't do that.
I'm not sure exactly the tech community needs to own up to. Allowing an 11 year old who has irresponsible parents to use the internet?

Do tech companies need to verify government issued IDs to register new users?
I think I have everything needed lying around in spare parts. Know of a guide for install? I tried building something similar years ago but got stuck on the software.
:D exactly. AI will help one side to decrease the signal to noise ratio and the other side to increase it. The same for the 'content' industry.
That one is a bit different because they simply fabricated observational data (in the dog park paper at least).
"Including" / "Involving" cyclists. Why the focus on the victim (more often than not) and the passive voice?
The proper response would be: "Sorry, this is the wrong journal to submit to. We don't have any expertise in physics."
> rep-tiles

Lol, nice!
I meant in a theoretical sense, like as a thought experiment. If the shutter were an idealized, global shutter, where each row of pixels are exposed instantaneously, what would be the special relativity implications, if any?
It is a metasyntactic variable for FNORD [1]. You have stumbled on the core of the Mother of All Conspiracy Theories, this is how they manipulate us all. Burn it I say, burn it with fire and spread the ashes.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fnord
As someone in the last "no2id" campaign: we were against the outcome of introducing ID checks everywhere. It's not good to impose state ID checks on people in their daily life.

What we ended up with is the ID checks were introduced anyway, without the card itself. So you need ID to have a job or a bank account or rent a house, but there's no formal ID system, and deeply ridiculous things like "utility bills" are used instead.

A good example of how stupid the system is: because the British public is anti-immigration, immigrants (and only immigrants) are required to have ID cards. The "biometric residence permit". When you naturalize, one part of the process is .. destroy your ID card.
As someone approaching 50, coding since the age of 10, started doing side gigs at the age of 14, such success rate is very uncommon.
The police have the right with suitable warrant to break any encryption.
Wasn't that mostly on wsl1?
Ireland is a pretty good option although Dublin property prices are mad.
The truth of the matter; there is no reasoning under which such a call can be considered as a "moral" or civilized. The motivation behind is not humanitarian, on the contrary it is pure terrorism in all-encomassig meaning of the word. If you doubt that, put your-self in the situation, right now as you sit wherever, receiving this call.

Another poster asked a question: Would you prefer that they dont call? I reject this frame of reference all-together as a valid one. So far, 10k people as per UN data ~70% of them children (and there are innocent men as well, which puts as per UN estimate >90% of casualties as pure non-combatants) and women have been massacred in openly admitted and self-proclaimed extermination process, and they received no such call. Nay, they actually are actively being starved and do not even have electricity for weeks now to even being able to take the call.

Therefore, if such call is made or are made, they are exception. Most people did not receive it before being murdered. Hence, its nature is not humanitarian but the contrary, calculated terror. Any sane human not consumed by ethnic or racial hatred (for which I have not need to comment) cannot accept this argument as moral. That BBC runs this an a tone and implied morals is despicable.
Nice! Thanks for pointing their project out.
The irony is that they are defending the right of a manufacturing cartel to limit the options of what these valiant freedom fighters can do with stuff they own (with the "hard-won" money they managed to rescue from the evil "taxman" :-).

But assuming they indeed want the "freedom" to have unrepairable cars, what about my freedom to want a market that offers them. Same with a market for cars that are not surveillance devices etc. Are their needs more important than mine?

Political extremism turns people into ugly entitled morons. Alas its not a sad circus to watch from afar. They are taking society down to their sociopathic dark world.
I mean was a GPT even involved really? If you gave just Lens a shot, I'm sure it also would've picked it up and given you a link to some page with it on.
But its too expensive to become practical with the OpenAI API. Also, demo is cool until you see the real-world webpages, then you'll realize that this only works less than %50 of webpages.
> Now that microservices are no longer in vogue...

They certainly never heard of MACH Architecture and headless CMS.
> Hoppscotch is a lightweight, web-based API development suite.
The Netwide Assembler (NASM)
The five eyes..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes

This is not lobbying, this is called Foreign Political Interference
One telescope can't watch one star for decades to find planets in larger orbits. All transit-based exoplanet detection will naturally bias towards detection of large planets in short orbits around small stars.
Check the books Traction and Who, you could make a score card for each position based on your business goals.
And they did this in mid 2022. Not bad, but the concept is a bit flawed. Hm, there is still room for improvement ;).
The bottleneck is mostly on the read path,even leveraging xdp heavily. dpdk/vpp would be faster. In the case however of an ISP 10k subscribers/network segment at 25Gbit is more than enough and busies 40% of 20 cores, on libreqos. Others are making boxes capable of more using smarter ethernet cards. If only more ISPs cared about QoE, we could cause a run on ebay on slightly obsolete Xeons and finish up fixing the bufferbloat problem right quick!
> Patching an 0-day isn't the same thing as adding a new privacy or security feature

You think that, but where is that written?

> Linux is different because anyone can very clearly see the roadmap for features by following the LKML.

If there's a requirement to inform the HO, posting on LKML is not going to meet that. Also the HO may start vetoing Linux changes.
All the editorial response demonstrates is that the editors understood so little about so many things that they could not understand the difference between an evident satire of a pseudoscientific text and something of substance. Any scientifically reader immediately realizes that the Sokal text was a joke (if someone doesn't, they don't meet my standard for "scientifically educated").
> In practice the analogy doesn't hold up of course, since it's costly and noticeable for cops to raid a house but cheap and easy for the government to spy on everyone (and we know how eager they are to do it).

The same goes the other way too though - it's cheap for criminals/terrorists to communicate over e2e encrypted software compared to having to travel to meet physically.
Any thoughts or experience? What do You think?
Tbf, having a coalition system doesn't really solve it either. You avoid some of the more egregious edge case results, but overall having a few large parties that agree on nothing eventually has them unable to form a functional government and the ones that manage to do so fall apart before their term is up.

Having a system with political parties at all is the crux of the issue and we can't move forward without addressing that. We are tribal in nature, and if you give people the slightest excuse to form smaller groups they'll fight other groups forever.
Sounds like a promotional article for the service he used, honestly.
Yes, you can evaluate Swift code in LLDB. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/71882942
The countries have every right to be upset, but this is standard practice and everyone does it. There's a reason why counterintelligence agencies exist.

My comment was a preemptive response to the inevitable naive and/or grandstanding rants people here are apt to deliver on the subject. E.g., your own comment.
But this use case shows that the rate of success is low when using ai. So if anything it would indicate that using ai for job applications is not a good idea. If i see ai spam in a job applicant’s email i am rejecting them instantly.
But doesn't doing X for 1 month make you a charlatan? For example, consider you only did frontend/ui/ux for one month. How much rubbish you would pick up over that time by googling for tutorials or watching youtube videos to get you started; and how alien a real front-end veteran would look to you.
> I forgot that it's CMake that can now generate Ninja files.

Cmake has had ninja support for a long time. I've used it for at least 7 years at this point.
It's a heatmap of population density.
> Britain once led the world in computing.

It's not really a coincidence that our computing pioneer Turing was pushed into suicide by the security services.
Everything vs. Anything
Very prophetic:

> is this meant as a new scheme to pick up underage children by getting them one-on-one with no one else to monitor the two-way conversation?
https://archive.is/PzN0p
What are you talking about?

There are millions of "impenetrable locks" in our society -- things you can do that might give the government less than 100% control over you. You could put your money in crypto where it can never be seized, should crypto be illegal? You could bury your money in a forest where it can never be seized, should shovels be illegal? You can stab somebody with a knife, should knives be illegal? You could fly to a foreign country, should flights be illegal? You could discuss a crime in-person not over the internet, should private conversations be illegal?

The fact is, unless you want a totalitarian state, the agreement is that society functions without perfect control by government, and most of us prefer to live in such regimes. In fact, most of us recognize that regimes that want more and more power over the individual usually end up misusing it.

THe easy boogey-monster is child-porn, but that's bull done by a tiny fraction of the population. The real monster is authoritarian governments, which are the majority of governments in the world.
So let's hope they don't switch the voting order again.

https://www.techdirt.com/2019/03/26/enough-meps-say-they-mis...
That's a very bad example as all walls and all locks are breakable.
Too bad. I'll repost it once it's broadly available.
That's because these GPTs are trained to complete text in human language, but unfortunately the training data set includes human language + human culture.

I really think they need to train on the wider dataset, then fine tune with some training on a machine specific dataset, then the model can reference data sources rather than have them baked in.

A lot of the general purposeness but also sometimes says weird things and makes specific references is pretty much down to this I reckon...it's trained on globs of human data from people in all walks of life with every kind of opinion there is so it doesn't really result in a clean model.
A lot of folks are hungry in my state. As in : not enough nutrient a day.

https://www.cpex.org/blog/stateofhunger
> a large contingent of people who essentially do manual data copying

Yup.

I was briefly part of a decades long effort to migrate off a main frame backend. It was basically a very expensive shared flat file database (eg FileMaker Pro). Used by thousands of applications, neither inventoried or managed. Surely a handful were critical for daily operations, but no one remembered which ones.

And the source data (quality) was filthy.

I suggested we pay some students to manually copy just the bits of data our spiffy "modern" apps needed.

No one was amused.

--

I also suggested we find a suitable COBOL runtime and just forklift the mainframe's "critical" infra into a virtual machine.

No one was amused.

Lastly, I suggested we throttle access to every unidentified mainframe client. Progressively making it slower over time. Surely we'd hear about anything critical breaking.

That suggestion flew like a lead zeppelin.
So is encryption with sufficient resources. The point is to make it non-trivial.
100% coverage is very rare outside safety critical code. People are much more willing to invest time in adding features than writing (often boring, repetitive and tedious) tests just to get perfect coverage -- finding a bug later is a risk people are willing to take.

And even 100% doesn't mean much -- you can easily come up with examples where you have 100% coverage but there are still bugs.
Okay, now can I read the intercept version of this story.
Or a rolled sock...some airlines even provide the two of them, for the odd wailing little couple
Errno – ENOANO 55 No anode – what is it?
The point here was not if philosophy is scientifically correct, but if the journal editors could tell apart philosophy from purposely empty babble. This was not an attack on philosophy but on the journal editorial team.
You're calling me a 12 year old because you refuse to confront your naive presumptions? Ok adult person, let me use adult words: cladenstine intellige agencies specifically exist to enact espionage and sabotage explicitly violating both national laws and international treaties. They have rules such as how diplomatic cover spies work and non-cover spies work and how countries react to them when discovered but their job is specifically this. Not war time intelligence or just spying on poor countries. Military intelligence exists as the name implies for spying on militaries. Clandestine intelligence officers and their assets break laws, treaties and trust on your behalf without telling you so you can act surprised and pretend your bloody hands are clean.
That's the point. You can at least filter out the rif-raf because you'll recognize yourself in those people quickly.
I give up on job interviews as soon as I receive a ".docx" with instructions, and I'm taking about "tech" companies
> So for instance try doing marketing yourself for a month.

People who try coding for a month and based on that try to hire a programmer make terrible clients/managers. I am not sure this advice would apply to anything that has even a little depth/nuance.
Nicely done! Very cool.

And good job on the excellent GIF in the readme which completely demonstrates what it does - something that's often missing on such projects.

Got a chuckle out of this too:

> Disclaimer: This is a demo and is not intended for production use. It doesn't have any auth so you will go broke if you deploy it.
Harry Mack
Heh yup looks that way now, along with a priesthood protecting the discourse. Interesting that people like Neil Turock are using their position to right the ship now though.
If that's true it should be renamed to something less likely to mislead people into thinking it's a theory, e.g. "mass distribution anomaly".
Why even write cover letters anymore?
I agree with all the other points made here around politics;
Compromise, check. Realism, check. Popular conviction, check! ... But
one simply cannot go up against mathematics armed with wishful
thinking.

The reason this is an issue for splitting is that there really are no
half-measures. One must choose a path.

The confounding thing about the UK and encryption these past years is
that we've had a technically uneducated government and/or advisors
that are mischievous. Nowhere have I ever seen the basic humility
and falliblism to say;

"This is a complex issue. We don't really understand the parameters.
Choosing this or that path could have terrible consequences. What
do you the people think?"

Of course most will say, the uneducated "people" are the last to
have any useful input. At least the elected government have some
political chops, if not any technical vision. But we're not asking
"the people" to weigh in on the merits of key escrow or weakened PRNGs
- the choice is fascism or democracy - because people have a
fundamental right to privacy and democracy cannot thrive without that.
The discussion is about real estate. Look at the world map, most of the world is below replacement levels. Exactly what I said. Even countries like India are just at replacement levels and will soon be below as well.
> there is no way to address EIP directly

In general this is a "thing" on pipelined processors, especially once you have out-of-order, because "current instruction" starts to smear out across a bunch of instructions. But for CALL the processor has to dump the pipeline and pick a specific return address to put on the stack.

(unless you're MIPS with the branch delay slot nonsense)
How is this accomplished? Is there a memory cell close to every physical pixel? Did they sandwich two dies together?
Except the comment higher up says the prosecution dropped the case due to disagreeing with the court's decision that information wasn't deemed secret enough.

The whole "we can't do that because secret stuff would be revealed and people put in danger" excuse seems to be used all too often of late, especially when that secret stuff appears to be illegal.
They are not.

These cases are withdrawn and the public enquiry that follows will not show anything new.
> Something to do with preventing government overreach

Which doesn't make any sort of sense, really, if you think about it for more than a few seconds. Any of the governments in question already has at least one, usually multiple databases of their citizens (drivers licenses, births, passports, health systems, social security, taxes etc.) which are easy to correlate for probably 99.99% of people. They wouldn't gain anything from an overreach/surveillance perspective for everyone to have an uniform ID with number and a photo, because they already have all that information anyways. But regular people would gain a ton because they would be easily able to identify themselves uniquely to whoever needs it, without useless intermediaries (like utility bills), and without any risk of identity fraud or errors.
> If an academic field has "science" in its name, it's not a science.

Yeah, suck it materials scientists, your discipline ain't real.
Am I correct that only the enterprise version ($40/mo) will have the ability to use your GH repos as context for the chat? If so that kind of sucks.

I’d almost consider paying for it for my personal repos which contains my side business but it’s a stretch.
>statists

Oh cry me a river with that cynical view of democracy.

Just because you aren't engaged in democracy doesn't mean everyone wants to be a lame duck.
You’re a charlatan if you I think that after a month you’re an expert. As long as you’re honest with yourself it can’t hurt to have some direct experience for the role you’re hiring for. A lot of people applying for the job won’t even have that month.
who else is going to tell me that all my ideas are stupid? an LLM?
Omegle was a horrible place that was not moderated enough and enabled groomers. It was also a place that felt very "old school internet" due to the "wild west style".
OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition. This is a sophisticated software feature that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to convert a scanned contract or document from an image to a useful data set. OCR has drastically altered the playing field for Contract Management Systems!
What word would you propose? Seems pretty accurate.

While I think it's possible you're right that the cyclists are usually the victims, that's not a foregone conclusion for at least two reasons:

- cyclists can hit pedestrians who are even more vulnerable. Pedestrians are also included in this analysis.

- as much as cyclists hate to hear it, they're the most reckless users of the road on average (even worse than scooter drivers). Every time I walk around in London I see them cutting red lights to conserve momentum, changing from using car rules to pedestrian rules when it helps them, driving quickly across pedestrian crossings (too fast for cars to see them coming), and other "convenient" actions that are hard for cars/pedestrians to safely deal with.
AI is just the new spam.
What an odd response. I'm not even sure how to react. Your claim is we must only communicate with our families.
The rate of success is tremendously high when viewed as a return on time invested compared to the 'normal' method.
Yeah, he never saw the Rohingyas get slaughtered.
First either add "Show HN" or "AD".

Second I use bruno https://www.usebruno.com/.
Email isn't knocking on doors.
It's an Electron app, isn't it
> neutral state when it comes to human rights

Neutrality against oppression is de facto supporting oppression. Having mainstream political parties directly funded by fucking Russia is also hardly conducive to human rights.
YouTube literally grew off the back of "illegal" music uploads by users, and profited greatly from their DIY content upload work, but now it wants to charge for its overall product while smugly cracking down on those that evade paying? Reeks of hypocrisy.
The Elixir add-ons for VS Code provide this too.
What do you hope to achieve with this assertion? What should I take from it?

It feels like a very flippant response after I gave so much time and attention to your research.
"We don't talk about bruno"

I'd say Hoppscotch is aimed more at teams looking for a Postman replacement - particularly with regards to the cloud-syncing functionality.

Our team's looked into it in the past, and unfortunately we determined that the cost of having to maintain it at a sufficient SLA + the cost of potential interruption to our critical business functions if we got it wrong was not something we could absorb at the time. Easier to just pay for Postman for the peace of mind.

Edit: ah I looked into bruno a bit more. It does syncing via git which might be enticing. I'll research more.