skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I tried to push for an "HTML first" style frontend at my job, but we hired some run-of-the-mill frontend devs and they basically didn't get it and just wanted everything to be divs with VueJS controlling all of the logic and content.

One semi-objective thing we lost was accessibility. Much of the site is impossible to navigate via keyboard due to naively re-implemented behavior like links being divs with click event listeners. It's actually somewhat worrying - when regulations hit us, we'll have to scramble hard to get back what we threw out.

But all in all I kind of agree with you that it's very hard to find high profile examples of sites that are "HTML first". I believe in it, but haven't actually seen it pan out. But I suspect the reasons for it not panning out might be purely in education. By the time HTML became powerful, frontend dev education was already deeply framework-focused.
Android uses the latest LTS kernel and works using a mainline kernel provided mainline supports the hardware you are on.

>though one weekend of fighting NVIDIA and wayland

Wayland is freedesktop software which is different than GNU.
Believe me when I say that sex addiction is worse because it has a much higher stigma attached to it, so it is generally much more hidden.

You could go to your wife and explain that you've spent the rent money on buying Smurfcoins to gamble on some lootbox lottery, but you can't go and tell her you've spent it on paying women to push squirrels up your bottom.
Only multiples of 6 (1 in 6 numbers) have 3 as their second prime factor so I wouldn’t expect the median to be 3
Your examples don’t have the same angles as the Wikipedia article in question. I don’t see the same amount of appendages at all or in squared angle intersections.

Furthermore to have 90 degree angles in water from drifting appendages all line up at a convenient moment seems absurd.
The factors of 12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12.

The prime factors of 12 are 2, 3.
wait, what? Largest and biggest are synonyms. Why are you deciding that larger means "having more population"
It makes that one party much more powerful and difficult to deal with in the future.

Google is already at the point of too big to fail.
Yes, it can be added, but manually going over all form. Also, how would it protect against a CSRF without the token in place?

Note: I totally agree that we should strive to go HTML first. However, this specific example is a bit unfair.
The FLSA is a joke. You can be forced to work unpaid overtime if you work with computers and your salary is over $35k/year among other nonsensical exemptions.

It needs to be completely rewritten without any exemptions. If you’re expected to work, or be available to work on short notice, you should be getting paid full or more salary for the time.

This is a huge problem for IT workers as companies expect computer systems to run 24/7 but frequently refuse to pay for more than one shift to support them so people end up working 24/7 and can’t live their lives because they’re tethered to computers.

This, among other things, is why IT workers need to unionize.
I can't recommend "The Apollo Guidance Computer: Architecture and Operation" book highly enough. It's an awesome book that looks into details of AGC's inner workings.

One interesting tidbit: the raw machine code in AGC was a veritable Turing Tarpit-style hell. So instead of just powering through it, they added an interpreter for a much more human-friendly language that ran on top of it.

Levels of abstraction: they're not just for enterprise applications!
Theres a great video of a talk on the AGC from Robert Wills at England's The National Museum of Computing

https://youtu.be/B1J2RMorJXM?si=XPNHLyXWmLewrOV7

More info and links to other videos on https://mattfife.com/?p=4982
At this point the horse is out of the barn. People want a connected center screen. Figure out how to do it in an open way if you must, but telling people not to want it doesn't work.
Yeah I also want to know this, I used to write diaries for years and cherish it, thought I would look back my life or extract something meaningful out of it, turns out I very rarely look at it.

Same goes to old project archives, emails, I have both HDD and S3 Glacier for them, but so far I have never looked at them at all, for 10 years, And I doubt I will look at them in another 10 years.

I am beginning to thinking Letting past go and You aren't gonna need it philosophy towards such things
Noticed their outage earlier today so took a look, looks like their status page has an issue. This is what I can see now: https://ibb.co/cvyYwVp. 92 out 92 products are abnormal in Beijing. Maybe just a UI bug.
When the Northridge quake hit in 1994 and took out a section of I-10 (it literally fell and crumbled), they had it rebuilt in 31 days, using the state of emergency bureaucratic "fast pass".

I have a feeling this will be reopened by Thanksgiving.
> it's very hard to find high profile examples of sites that are "HTML first"

Because the tools to create it are relatively new, and the sites you're speaking of had already been written. What high-profile site didn't already have a massive legacy React/Angular/Vue codebase, and a team of framework-trained developers, as of 2021?
Those aren’t doing so hot lately either. Secret Invasion in particular was pretty bad.

I’ve heard a lot of positive comments about The Marvels though. I’ll probably see it in a week or two.
When you've been working for a while - not necessarily even for the same company- you gather an internal library of knowledge that you can pattern match against for solutions. You may not have seen the exact same thing, but you may have seen something like it. There are hardly ever an entirely novel class of bugs anymore
>For this reason, I think we shouldn't be secretive with which of our people are employed by the military, and which divisions they're in or what training.

if that was actually somehow the case then one would think that world powers would then just flood the information marketplace with erroneously prestigious and elite soldiers en masse -- and then the next group would do the same thing until any real information that may be derived is so dilute as to be useless strategically.

large weapons are a unique and demonstrable capability -- I fail to see how that metaphor applies to leaked personnel data.
Ouch, this is painfully accurate.

Although I think communities can go in a few different directions after stage 3. Another common outcome seems to be: arriving at an imperfect but reasonable compromise between the needs of new users and core contributors, which keeps the community relatively stable but maybe not quite as fun as it used to be.
NASA Brought an Asteroid to Earth
Well written. Draws a rosy picture of a youth that gave him opportunities that he rose too.
This lets you use OpenAI’s models or local LLMs.

The API is governed by a different policy than ChatGPT and won’t be used for training data.
There was no way out for him but a bullet to the head or breach—he welded himself in. https://youtu.be/w7QG1w3ixkM?si=6afvV_acZbfqdkKz
Well, sure, here's a quick example of an uncooperative victim and the state attempting (and in this case failing) to prosecute on robbery charges anyway: https://www.norwichbulletin.com/story/news/crime/2009/03/21/...
>Also, are we just going to ignore the entire industry trying to fix marriages? eg. marriage counselors, self help books. Sure, they might be of questionable usefulness, but solving relationship problems is hard. I'd hardly characterize it as "solving for symptoms, not root problems".

What about all the lawyers that get to charge huge rates for providing services in these cases? Is that really "productive"? In the grand scheme of things, I don't think so. It shows up as GDP, but it's really a tax (or leach) on society, sort of like tax-prep services and healthcare insurers.

In a way, I think OP might be right: the root problem isn't being solved. The root problem, however, is a source of huge disagreement I'm sure. Personally, I think one of the roots is people getting into bad relationships in the first place. They could avoid most of this trouble and expense by simply not getting married to Mr./Ms. Wrong. Society pushing people to get married is part of the problem here, though the other part is now society actually allows people to get divorced, instead of pressuring (or forcing) them to stay together miserably, even with abusive and/or violent partners. Of course, this is changing: people really are getting married less, which the divorce lawyers probably aren't happy about.

The other root problem, IMO, is that I think marriage as a social model has probably largely outlived its usefulness, and society needs to come up with some other model for relationships. But I'm probably 20-100 years ahead of my time with this thinking.
Orotidine 5'-Phosphate Decarboxylase
That's not true. EU nations set their own tax policy freely. That's why the EU is claiming it isn't simply a tax issue, but a hidden subsidy. The EU already lost once, but they are trying again
Ironically, you are making the argument for a cashless society.

If I use my credit card everywhere, I can't be robbed. If someone rips me off, I have a giant bank that will get my money back. I never have to hit up an ATM for anything; I never have to deal with coins and change. I don't even need to have my physical wallet on me to make a transaction. I don’t need to talk to the cashier or wait in line to order and pay for lunch or coffee. Since you mentioned mobsters, if I pay for my lunch with a card, I know that the business owner can’t as easily evade taxes, stealing from coffers that fund the government services I rely upon.

What exactly would compel me to want to use cash for anything? What about my life would improve?

I would just like to see better data privacy protections surrounding cashless payments, disallowing my card issuer and merchants from abusing and selling information about my transaction history. I would also like to see a low limit placed on transaction fees.

Technically, those are really small problems to fix, if we can get some political will around it. Many other non-US countries have probably already fixed those problems.
Is Lightning primarily web components? That would make sense, since css vars penetrate the shadow dom, so with this approach there's no need to mess with loading your css into the component's shadow dom.
That's security theater though.

It will protect you against an "honest mistake" like if you asked for code to delete all files with an "x" in the name and the command is deleting all files with a star "*" and you catch that. Great.

It will not protect you against actual malicious code. LLM inputs should be treated with the same caution and suspicion as unregistered-user inputs submitted over Tor.
The stories and opportunity this generation of people have are amazing to me. Lax immigration, cheap tuition, jobs are easy to come by. But they didn’t have the internet.

Today the author probably wouldn’t be able to afford California’s community college out of state tuition. They probably wouldn’t be accepted to Stanford with a 3.8. Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if it would be impossible to convert from their B1 to an F1 without requiring an expensive return flight home and re-ingress into the US.

There are so many more barriers to everything, in lots of annoying little legal and political ways, but mostly due to the higher cost of everything.

Today we have an abundance of technology, connectedness, and information, but paradoxically the barrier to do anything substantial seems much higher. Sure 2 day shipping and the gig economy is abundant, but I mean the ability to do something to truly benefit and improve yourself.

What would the modern day equivalent of this tale be? Where/when are these kinds of opportunities available now?
It was a pallet storage facility that burned.
They keep making boring content and using progressiveness as a cover, IE: if you find the stories bland and the characters having no depth then you must be racist, homophobic or misogynistic.

But I think a larger cohort of people have realised that, no, actually people were not slamming these movies because everyone is anti-progressive.

The only issue now is that Disney owns half of all media, so if you like movies or want to go on a date or take the kids to the cinema, you don’t get a seriously large variety.

Loki was truly excellent though, so they can do this; they just choose not to make complex and interesting stories and characters.
Not much the same. Your examples were new techs that enables new thing, but no one knew how it useful . For internet access, fiber or 4G/5G cell tower are existing better solution for non-rural ground use. It's great for very rural area (including industry use) and I'm exciting how it make new use case on marine, but it's not so exciting for urban/suburban use.
Fortunately there is 30 year old tech that does exactly this without any modern app-tier enshittification.

You can start a car from 2km away by pushing a button on the key ring. This is a solved problem. That doesn't involve a smartphone.
> Combined with Privacy Sandbox [0], this means the browser can track you directly without cookies, but websites can't track you via IP address. So it has the effect of centralising the tracking to google only

Definitely not the actions of an org trying to exert monopoly power.
Do you have more information than is in the news article? So far they are talking about this being a storage yard with a lot of wooden pallets, one that already had some (unspecified) complaints against it. While that does not preclude a homeless/unhoused person being the source of the fire, it does make it a bit unlikely.

Absent more information, it seems awfully prejudicial to blame the homeless/unhoused.
Smallest projects just throw up a bootstrap template and call it a day

something like this: https://www.hotelpalacebarcelona.com/

they don't care it's not "html first"
The default datepickers in browsers are not feature-rich at all though. They're fine for extremely basic "pick a date" type of usecases, but as soon as you want to do anything slightly complex like picking a range, a date & specific time in one or having it be interactive in some other way like Google Flights showing you a range of prices alongside the date etc., you have to create your own datepicker component (or use an already built one).
It is OpenAI's model (although you can switch to another LLM). It's just that your data and the actual run environment for the code you got from the ChatGPT API, runs locally.

So AFAICT your prompt is still "leaked" to OpenAI, but not your data.
Yeah this it's like people complaining about Mike Tyson talking about boxing despite being retired.
It's worth mentioning that the friction to deploy a web app is nearly zero these days, depending on how complex it is.

As an example, shipping a macOS or iOS app, via official means, requires a lengthy review & approval process, upfront costs, buy-in into native languages with little to no use outside of these platforms, a limited selection of tools, and hard decisions about which version of the OS to support based on the features you need vs. the market share of older versions.

People (and teams) choose web development for the lower barrier to entry, and as a platform, browsers get products most of the way to their goals, and fast.
Ask HN: Do you trust OpenAI, to not train on your data?
If you either just use their API or playground, disable the History in the ChatGPT UI or make a privacy request on https://privacy.openai.com then OpenAI states, they won't train on your data. Can you trust a company like OpenAI to actually not train on the data?
A lot of threads I've come across on the internet about bicycle helmets where many people chime in reports of how they broke bones and bounced their heads off the pavement in unprovoked, low speed crashes.

Drawing from a deep well of ignorance these same people adopt self-righteous tones to inform me that anyone who rides a bicycle without a helmet is an idiot.
>So it has the effect of centralising the tracking to google only.

I thought privacy sandbox could be used by any website, just the same as Google can use it. Am I wrong?

Disclosure: I work at Google, but as can be seen from my comment, I don't have much knowledge of privacy sandbox.
For some reason "For the honor of the regiment" got stuck in my head and I went and dug it up (along with the rest of the bolo stories).

"Stand and be judged." - motto of the 39th.
I've learned that life challenges and luck are extremely asymmetric in our society. I believe that even someone who is as smart and determined as Elon Musk could be totally and hopelessly broke if born in the wrong place at the wrong time. A lot of extreme luck in life looks trivial and common in retrospect and you only realize how fortunate it is when you know what 'normal luck' looks like.

To many, 'normal luck' today feels like the world is conspiring against them; the sheer scarcity of opportunities appears intentional and the result of intelligent planning because of how extreme it is. I think that explain the increase in conspiracy theorists today.

Extreme scarcity (combined with asymmetry) of opportunities creates a powerful illusion that even the brightest minds can fall for. "Why is Peter getting 1000x the reward as Paul for doing 1/10th of the work and delivering 1/10th of the potential value or delivering negative value? Maybe some invisible force is helping Peter and/or working against Paul?"

The greater the asymmetry, the more real this 'invisible force' seems as it provides an answer which seems to explain a lot of things.
The readme in the linked repository explains what they mean:

> An open-source, locally running implementation of OpenAI's Code Interpreter.

> […]

> Open Interpreter lets LLMs run code (Python, Javascript, Shell, and more) locally. You can chat with Open Interpreter through a ChatGPT-like interface in your terminal by running $ interpreter after installing.

> […]

> Comparison to ChatGPT's Code Interpreter

> OpenAI's release of Code Interpreter with GPT-4 presents a fantastic opportunity to accomplish real-world tasks with ChatGPT.

> However, OpenAI's service is hosted, closed-source, and heavily restricted:

> - No internet access.

> - Limited set of pre-installed packages.

> - 100 MB maximum upload, 120.0 second runtime limit.

> - State is cleared (along with any generated files or links) when the environment dies.

> Open Interpreter overcomes these limitations by running in your local environment. It has full access to the internet, isn't restricted by time or file size, and can utilize any package or library.

> This combines the power of GPT-4's Code Interpreter with the flexibility of your local development environment.

> […]

> Change your Language Model

> Open Interpreter uses LiteLLM to connect to hosted language models.

> You can change the model by setting the model parameter

> […]

> Running Open Interpreter locally

> Open Interpreter uses LM Studio to connect to local language models (experimental).

> Simply run interpreter in local mode from the command line
Anyone interested in this sort of thing should check out google's S2 projection, which is a space filling curve over the surface of a cube, where the orientation of the cube was chosen such to put the most problematic points out over the ocean. This has some nice advantages over just using a mapping from lat/long to a single square curve.

What3Word's bullshit pissed me off enough I fooled around with an open system based on the EFF's word lists some years back. If you combine them you can address any place on earth with 2 meter precision using 4 words, or 40 meter precision with 3 words.

I was just curious about how the numbers worked out so I never coded up anything meaningful to share, but I think it's an interesting idea. I also don't wanna get into any IP nonsense with people as obviously scummy and connected as W3W.

Compared to geohash the word granularity makes addressing rectangles vs points much more "chunky" but I think that's a tolerable tradeoff for a lot of applications.
One Dose of Lilly's Novel Heart Drug Cut Risk Factors for a Year
You certainly wouldn't want salt on any circuit boards. Liquid would be extremely conductive, and dried salt crystals wouldn't be great either. Might be like glitter.
and this is why that example doesn't work - you find out onclick doesn't work where you thought it would work

whereas you can addEventListener anywhere you want
Cool. Either cut the military budget or reform medicare. I think the best way to save money is probably to pass a constitutional amendment for death with dignity and allow old people to place irrevocable 'when I can't decide for myself anymore off me' status on their medical directives and shield providers who abide by it from lawsuits by the family. Not only do we torture people with continued medical treatments way past the ability for the patient to regain any quality of life because of fear of lawsuits and the family being unable to let go, but we do it blatantly disregarding explicit directives from the patient and we do it at a substantial cost. I am terrified of this happening to me and everyone should be if they think about it, but people are afraid to think about or discuss end of life decisions. There is also a sizable religious movement which opposes letting people make their own choice about this.

But that is never going to happen so let's keep spending trillions of dollars keeping old people alive against their will and cutting taxes for people who don't need it. Most middle class families would benefit more from massively subsidized tuition to secondary educational institutes or loan forgiveness than the tax cuts which would pass.

We could also fund the IRS more so they can actually go after people who avoid taxes with convoluted schemes and attorneys because right now they don't bother and rely on taking most of the income from the middle class who pay the most and don't fight back.
https://archive.today/bO7az
Fake news detection now a required subject in California schools
>They use a completely different framework for drivers for hardware

No, both use kernel modules or statically compiled code for the part of the driver that actually talk to the hardware.

>they have their own patches for binder

Binder is part of mainline Linux, but yes I guess technically there are some patches that are related to binder, but remember that Android works on a mainline kernel.
Beg Bounties (2021)
Not really for compression, but they are used for GIS indexing in databases.
This was better than Thor4 or Quantumania. Good action, chemistry, and a decent story.

Disney+ probably isn't helping. not being able to do promo work due to the strike didn't help, either.
The nice thing about native behaviors is you only have to teach them once. Custom behaviors per application make it harder for people to develop a model of how their computer works because you have to learn a new interaction model per application. I’m pretty anti the notion that UX is intuitive in any sense: all human-computer interaction is learned at some point and we should focus more on educating people how to do tasks like this than pursuing some lowest-common denominator concept of “intuitiveness” or “discoverability”.

Anyways, my favorite multiselect paradigm is the old windows one with two list boxes side by side and buttons in between.
I dont think it is a great idea to mark WAF out of scope. Most of the compliance automation platforms force you to enable it.

Even if you mark it out of scope, this pops up in most of the RFPs. Customers are generally not very keep to see security implementations that are out of the box. It should be kind of industry standard.

Having said that, WAFs are falling out of fashion lately.
It's because replacing jet fuel with batteries is not a technical option right now.

Banning jets isn't an option either so we'll have to use more fringey solutions.
People want tactile hard buttons, not a "connected center screen".

Who started this myth?