skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Okay, so for the moment leave aside the safety critical bits (only for a moment) - what's the excuse for not opening up the center console? That generally is already segregated and only handles non critical functions.
we can be more precise now:

the three produced the equation, which pretended that all things were (could be) equalized into equivalence. they called this algebra and parised some monotheistic god; they called this magic and GOTO one.
Reading comprehension. SanDisk is not Seagate
I can't speak for Hugo but no, Pelican is not a framework. It's a static site generator. I cannot make general purpose, dynamic websites with Pelican. I can fake a few things, I can hook it up to cron to mimic it, but Pelican itself is concerned primarily with your data store, your theme, and generating static files to upload directly to your webspace.

Sure, you can make plugins for Pelican to make it generate things the way you want, but it's still just a generator/builder using Jinja templates and Markdown or some other text transformation tool.

Also, there's no real indicator that I used Pelican to build my site. There's no cruft I'm including in my <head> element or anything else. It outputs regular-ass HTML.

I'm sure it's nice to be able to swap into dynamic web app mode if you decide a project's going differently than expected, but I don't run into that much with the things I design. I usually know from the beginning which tech I'll need to achieve the goal.

Frameworks force the dev into specific ways of doing things, so if a program fits into that architecture, go nuts. I'm curious what you guys need on your sites that require so much JS.
Cool, just wondering on what platform it'll be hosted (european I hope)
You can also recover the metals, the ferrous ones anyway, because it doesn't get hot enough to burn them off. In theory, great for those objects that are metal stuff inside plastic stuff, so you recover something that you weren't going to (or didn't) recover with other methods.

Interesting charts on Page 18 here: https://vbsa.ch/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Studie-Bunge-Inte...

Most metals end up in the bottom ash, but only half the lead and a small fraction of chromium...

I thought the ash was hazmat though and using it in concrete was a bit experimental.
I feel that the latest ChatGPT web UI updates were a bit rushed and are buggy, especially on mobile (I'm not using their mobile app). I hope they fix this before making any new UI features.
While I agree that there is probably an overuse of frontend rendering when templating in the backend would be fine, I suspect most of the problems you see have nothing to do with that. In my experience, the number one issue with slow sites is an overuse of trackers and advertising that drags everything down.
Started with The Mote in God's Eye last month. Now I'm almost done with The Gripping Hand.
Many software engineers I know just don’t like interacting with people. Machines are better unless they are buggy UIs.
not in binary notation they're not
No. I primarily switch when can't remember a word.

I also describe things and that also works quite well.
But is EA an institution? It seems to me like a big-tent philosophy; anybody (honest or dishonest) can declare themselves an adherent, and while there are several organizations that have set themselves up within the umbrella, there's nobody conferring official titles.
> Well, the client doesn't have to verify anything. They just need the yes/no response.

The client meaning the user. They have no way to verify that the server isn't associating their name with the response.

> The ID provider is the government in this case, so hopefully there would be laws and oversight to closely regulate their behavior in this context.

The government is the thing that enforces the law. It has a tendency of not enforcing the law against itself.

Criminals who compromise government servers are already breaking the law. A foreign intelligence service or drug cartel is not going to adhere to your country's laws.

> Well, in this case the name is never given to the third party site.

You have to give your name to someone in order to access the site. It doesn't matter who the someone is, that's enough to deter people who can't have their name associated with the site, because they have no way to prove that the system is trustworthy and competently secured, these kinds of things commonly aren't, and can't they take the risk. Classic chilling effects.
The exception is when using a framework which isolates CSS at the component level, in which case your class names don’t matter anywhere near as much because you’ll only ever see them alongside the corresponding HTML.
This whole post is an anti-pattern and bad advice. It read as from someone who didn’t go through the growing pains of building complex websites.

This is how we started building websites until things started to break with side effects, conflicting class names, bad introspection etc. and React came to the rescue.

The pattern you want is progressive enhancement and your output to be clean, compact html that’s augmented by JS. Which means build step. Everything opposite to this article’s advice.
This is the documented reason that the plastic manufacturers promoted recycling.

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/11/897692090/how-big-oil-misled-...
Yep, the images are made with DALL-E 3 + some editing... Grammar isn't what DALL-E is best at. At least for the moment!

After that 55%, can you elaborate a bit? Is it too complicated, or just nothing of value for the user?

As in, not something that an AI rookie would ever use
My team was facing an issue with their microservice not recovering after a Kafka outage, which we only observed once and we couldn't reproduce, and didnt understand why not. Googling the symptoms did not yield anything. ChatGPT gave us a theory which happened to be correct, which was that the outage needed to be long enough for the kerberos ticket needed to expire. I estimate without this answer from chatgpt we would have wasted at least a day of our own or other people's time in investigation, but it was solved in minutes.
As someone who doesn't have the resources: of course I don't.

But I also don't want the markets dictated by the whims of some dissociated jackoff arrogantly and ineffectively disbursing obscene amounts of money, and certainly not with the momentum of some centralized institution. I need cheaper food and cheaper rent and cheaper utilities prices to be able to effectively act as an altruist - you have to take care of yourself before you can take care of others - and when all of the resources are being siphoned off and distributed to the top, myself and millions of others simply lack the capacity.

And if many hands makes for little work, doesn't that give way to a more effective framework than a handful of people controlling affecting altruism? I reckon so.

Not to mention the whole free market thesis being wholly disrupted by the shrinkage of the middle class in developed nations, leaving the have-nots subordinated to the haves and ever more preoccupied with just getting by.
From the history of FOSS phones, I feel like we need to start much smaller here.

How many lines of code would it take to build a FOSS golf cart?
Up for pushing your scripts to GitHub to share. I’d be interested in trying it out.
Well, speakersafetyd is is shipped in upstream fedora, which definitely is not apple-specific.

And you don't need a recording studio to enable it on more hardware. marcan did the measurements for the MacBooks with a cheap measurement mic.

So you can have great audio on any hardware by just doing the measurements and including them in the asahi-audio package, _in upstream fedora_.

Source: marcan on mastodon[1]

[1]: https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/111398502380681345
Well he does enough self owning to erode any good will he’s ever earned. You can’t fix stupid. The man is a genius but socially very stupid.
Ask HN: What Are You Building?
It could be anything. Software, hardware, communities, relationships, anything.
definite "maybe" - a model can only return elements present in the training material. This is a powerful formula, but not "everything" .. blurring the story with a child, and prediction as a general quality.. is moving into "deception technique" either consciously or not IMHO
The Apollo Guidance Computer (2021)
> That also depends on GC, and the language, and the implementations of the GC.

Nothing depends on no GC.

I'm not anti-GC. I earn most of my living using GC languages. But there comes a time when the cost of power and hardware outweigh the value of GC. When that time comes Rust is an excellent way to solve it. I am, however, very "anti" the "no such time exists" position. That has never been and will never be true.
I wonder if there's measurable benefit to reducing shipping weight by roasting closer to the source?
There is no HR department or board of quality assurance for effective altruism: it's like Spiderman fandom: the only qualification for becoming a fan of Spiderman is saying that you are a fan of Spiderman. The other Spiderman fans have no way to kick you out of the fandom. EA is more like Spiderman fandom than it is like priesthood in the Catholic Church.

At least in the Bay Area, I heard that the people who regularly organize in-person events will refuse entry to certain men who have a history of preying on women, but really there is no way to prevent those men or anyone else from persisting in publicly proclaiming that they are effective altruists.
People watch older content all the time.
> Let language models run code on your computer.

No, I don’t think I will.

For anything remotely complex, even gpt-4 hallucinates libraries and commands.
Ml training for example.

"Generate cartoon in style of"
Isn't this just Unobtrusive Javascript all over again?

We lost that war once, I don't see why we would win now. I'm saying "we" because I am particularly for this approach, too.

Don't get me wrong: I absolutely hate React, and am very cinical about the whole "server side rendering" fad (well, we've been doing server side rendering for 30 years, right?). Still, I think the overall web community simply does not care enough, so I've kind of given up.
Center consoles have been used quite successfully as beachheads by hackers to be able to get into more important systems because car manufacturers are typically utterly clueless when it comes to security. So obscurity is a very large part of their security. Of course that doesn't really work with the most motivated parties (car thieves and their captive techies) having a field day with this.

Hyundai and Kia are reportedly so bad that they ended up paying out a large amount of money to compensate owners.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/hyundai-kia-agree-200-million-...

But don't worry, it's been fixed now. Probably.
Did you buy in person, or in an online marketplace (ex. Amazon)? I only buy thumb drives at physical stores to try and avoid outright counterfeits.
I'm all for open things, but that's a false equivalence. You don't use those tools on a public road around unsuspecting others.

In the same way you can't just merrily hack about with a plane. The FAA don't really care that much if you die in your experiment. They do care if the burning wreckage falls on someone minding their own business.
Does Porsche even know how to software?

When the Taycan was new, it had horrible software and the system would crash on the freeway. A Googler dug in a bit with the dealer and found it was running docker / docker compose and a bunch of the containers would just die sometimes. He banded some other Google Taycan owners (there’s probably a group ..) and they got their own NHSTA recall. Here’s an example of one of the many recalls: https://www.taycanforum.com/forum/threads/wnj8-wnk1-ana6-sof...
> ... but the effect EA has had on my life so far is that it gave me motivation and an easy framework to donate thousands of dollars a year to fund deworming, vaccination, and other direct relief in underdeveloped countries

TFA literally explains how a $18m donation with stolen money was used by the EA movement to buy a lavish mansion.

TFA also explains of the EA movement was lauding SBF for driving in a beaten up Toyota Corolla even though they fully knew he was living in a $40m luxury mansion in the Bahamas while flying private.

What makes you think most of the money you donate to such gurus actually end up to charitable causes ?

If you want to donate, donate directly to charitable causes instead of donating to obvious charlatans.

The EA movement tarnished its reputation by being accomplice in defrauding people's money in the FTX scam.

They played the "SBF is an altruistic genius driving a Toyota Corolla" card while they knew it wasn't true and people fell for it.

Turns out: there was no altruistic genius. And that's a decision of justice: guilty on seven criminal counts.

Maybe "EA" should be renamed "EC": "Effective Criminals"?
There was a recent post[0] where the author discovered that the company had deliberately tuned the loss rate so as to incentivize purchases. Which, I suppose is legally in their power. It is "just a game" where they can set the rules however they like.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37642538
My two year-old and wife go through plenty of dishes, too.
That is genuinely great news but:

- Only iPhone 15 Pro? not even an iPhone 15? This means almost nothing. You can't just be like, "Oh my site only works on every device except iPhones except iPhone 15 Pro.

- Still no Opus...

I will fully admit that I am out of date on this, by like a couple months. But the reason why I say it like this is because people have been making this claim for years even though it has apparently been true for like two months. Apple is half-assing this every step of the way. It will be like, 2025 before a site can just use AV1 without needing multiple encodings, and at that point you probably still won't be able to use Opus.

Thanks, Apple?
> Note: You'll be asked to approve code before it's run.
Connection Tracking (Conntrack): Design and Implementation Inside Linux Kernel
I love the idea but boy the use of hashtags is nauseating.
You're absolutely right. We had additionally one common JS/CSS file each.

Every approach has its pros and cons.
Altruism is just any kind of selfless helping of others. The "effective" part means thinking about how to do more good with limited resources; ie does a marginal dollar spent on cancer research do as much good as a dollar spent on malaria control.

Not everyone wants to do the math themselves so there's some communication involved in sharing that research.

And as with any cause, outreach can be very productive as well. Unless you're so wealthy that you think you can solve the world's problems all by yourself, you might find it worthwhile to spend some time on advocacy.
You know it's not a fair comparison due to how widespread English is and German is not.
This is not a means to avoid payroll taxes. They're still being paid by the contractor. And in a way that costs the corporation money, if contractors have to pay the tax out of after-tax income, because then they'll demand higher compensation to account for it, by the amount of the tax plus the amount of the tax due on the increase in compensation.

There are other reasons corporations prefer workers to be contractors, but that isn't it.
Blog post announcing it from (2021). How's it been going since?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28627902
The certificates are generated once for each document. So every 10 years for a national ID.

The information is then signed using the certificate with the helpg of your local device. Since the government is the CAA, the receiver can quickly check if a valid certificate was used, thus whether the information is valid.

The certificate is saved on the chip which is embedded in the ID, preventing the user from altering the data.

> You can't know how old someone is without knowing who they are.

With this scheme you can. The system guaranteed that the ID used is either a certain age or above/under 18.

> Otherwise they can just use someone else's ID.

Just like in the real world. That is why with increasing stakes, say a bank account, additional information or tests might be needed.
> Allowing a random hacker to override this is a terrible idea.

It should be a basic right no matter how "terrible" a idea it is. We bought it, we should have full control. Void the warranty or something.
Spawning AGI Systems
There was a story that came around about someone who "cloned" the Angry Birds game
just by interacting with a GPT system. The GPT system spit out the code, the person
would run it and then interact with the GPT to improve it. I presume the GPT was
using a language like Python or other traditional text-based language for the implementation.
Humans could understand the code.

Now lets assume that the GPT system created a "spawn of GPT" system that was a
newly formed neural network. The user interacts with the "parent GPT" giving
feedback. The parent creates input to the spawn and uses reinforcement learning
to "fix" the spawns behavior to match the required output.

Note that, while the goal was achieved, a human could not understand the result.

This is the most likely future.

I'll have to play with this idea.
The VW group is weird. From the outside it looks like they must have the most mental internal politics, unlikely that they'd push an initiative like that through all their brands that operate almost as distinct companies
It's the old debate between rationalism and empiricism again.

"Rational" is a dangerous word. On the surface, it sounds like "smart". But if you take rationalism to the extreme, it becomes epistemological opposition to evidence. You build mental models and make logical conclusions without considering if the conclusions are also valid in the real world.

Scientific worldview is closer to empiricism than rationalism. You start by assuming that your mental models are wrong. They may still be useful, but you have to make observations and experiments and consider the evidence to determine that.

Effective altruism is a useful concept. It only becomes problematic once you get too deep into rationalism. The effectiveness of your altruism is fundamentally an empirical question, and it should be answered by empirical means rather than by reasoning.
And what makes you think that the current crop of automotive software written in either asm or unsafe C is going to be any better than what you or I would produce? I've had a very recent model Mercedes C-class nearly kill me twice on account of buggy software. So much for that 'stellar' (pun intended) reputation. My current car is as dumb as it possibly could be.

I'd expect that if any ECU software was to be released that we'd finally realize how bad things really are and that there would be a massive amount of work done on making sure these pieces of critical software would be as safe as they could possibly be.

Note that the norm is 'a subset of C deemed to be safe' but that what I've seen of such development would not pass my personal threshold for quality work. In fact, rather the opposite. On the plus side, the hardware people usually know their stuff and realize what is dangerous to pass to the software people so with some luck your vehicle will use an FPGA for any kind of really safety critical stuff (or processors embedded with the relevant hardware, such as ABS and so on).
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/mBTvWNj9EXxyMM9TS/...

The stated goals put it (warm fuzzies donation) at less important than being effective (but still required so you don't burn out). So to the first order, your comment is incorrect.

However, perhaps you meant something more like "Ea trains you to be happy with making donations which which are more 'effective'", which would be true. And maybe a touch of pride/smugness for having figured it out.
> Why bother saying I can own it if the law also says no one can legally sell it to me?

The government isn’t saying “we’re totally ok with you personally taking drugs,” it’s saying “we don’t think that arresting people who have small amounts of drugs for personal consumption is a valuable use of law enforcement resources, so we’re decriminalizing personal possession and use to focus those resources on larger criminal organizations.”
The terrible irony is now nobody reads Usenet because of the spam. But people continue to endlessly automatically spam because Usenet is picked up by web indexers like Google who read the spam links. So Google dejanews has killed the very thing it valued. The machines have taken over and pushed out the humans.
> Their Extreme Pro SDs still as reliable as before

Try this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38244389
Very cool. The use of a webcam really makes me wonder if there's a future where our regular single ~78° FOV webcams are going to be replaced by dual (stereo) fisheye webcams that can:

- Enable all sorts of new UX interactions (gestures with eye tracking)

- Enable all sorts of new peripheral interactions (stylus like this, but also things like a steering wheel for racing games)

- Enable 3D 180° filming for far more flexible webcam meetings, including VR presence, etc.

The idea of being able to use the entire 3D space in front of your computer display as an input method feels like it's coming, and using a webcam the way OP describes feels like it's a little step in that direction.
Buybacks should be illegal, as they once were.
Yeah, this is how ASI will get us.
If you statically export you won't even notice, and when navigating it will actually be a lot faster when only the content is replaced..

Have you checked this is the reason? not slow network? and not ads/analytics and blocking assets? That's not exclusive to frameworks btw, and probably less likely as most optimize these things for you.

The website that is linked originally has a bunch of blocking assets.. lighthouse score is not amazing either.

Just like the original article, you might want to test your assumptions a bit more.
I loaned $2000 to a close friend in my 20s. He never paid me back, so when he got married I just told him to think of it as an early wedding present.

The friendship was (and still is) worth a lot more than $2000 to me.
Are we sure the copyright belongs to BBC and not the royal family?
Uhm did you receive your settlement from their class action lawsuit?
In countries where manhood must be proven, men have shorter lives
Bodhi. The enlightenment distro. I never thought I'd see the day.
Interesting comment about how Gelsinger wanted to cut the dividend sooner but was initially overruled by the CFO
> There is zero chance that this debt gets paid off without massive inflation. Zero.

Paying off this debt would be deflationary.
It would probably help to describe your workflow so we can offer specific suggestions.
What is this? Just some stuff for designers so that their webpages and brochures match or what?

I was really excited and expecting some info on their CAN bus and OS. Sigh...
If a fix requires soldering, then to >95% of people it doesn't exist. I would be surprised if even most computer repair ships were up to it.
They wouldn’t need amnesty if they can never be identified. Also, they could return the BBCs property anonymously and release the digitised versions after that.
> porsche-design-system/porsche-design-system

Why do companies open-source their design systems? Other people aren't allowed to create a website that looks like Porsche.com because of copyright and trademark laws anyway.

I always assumed it's because properly securing it is too much work for little gain (because of the reasons above), but maybe there's more to it?
Neither of those work for the inline event handlers proposed by this article. You need unsafe-inline or unsafe-hashes.