skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ISO 8601 timestamps do require a time zone when it is relevant. You can only use non-offset timestamps if "local time" is constant. If your time zone varies, you cannot use non-offset timestamps. Your choices are to choose a single tz and stick to it (in which case offsets should be used to clarify for humans), use UTC (which is probably the simplest option since you're sticking with one tz to begin with) or use offsets properly, marking the current timezone on all of them. Trying to use "local time" in places with DST is like trying to build a bridge out of paper.

For this reason, most people either use UTC time or they use offset timezones for timestamps. The latter is nicer for humans who like understanding when things happened in terms other than hundreds of millions of seconds since 1970, but more complex to implement.

Using standard ISO timestamps is good. The reason why people would like to use them is because they sort well, they parse everywhere, and they're human-readable. That last reason is the main and really only reason why you would prefer it to a Unix timestamp. They're standard, but they're a standard for how to communicate things in a human-readable manner. If you wanted to just store accurate time, store a binary 128-bit fixed-point long instead of using UTF-8, since it doesn't need to be human-readable.
USA - The Land of Freedom (from having any rights)
What do you find offence with? Hip speech and yawn-2.0-s aside, I find the claim entirely defendable, given, of course, a certain set of assumptions in this very new and uncertain space.
Sure, 40 years later, but for comparison my computer in 1990 had 1MB ram. Its replacement had 8M iirc a year or two later. I remember in the later 1990's having a problem with my socket7 computer because the caches couldn't physically tag more than 64M of ram, so everything above that was uncached. Linux of the mid 1990's would print a half dozen lines when one typed 'ps'.

A limitation of 8 thousand different protection ranges would have been a lot for a program utilizing a few hundred KB of actual data and coming from a system were it was a PITA to access a data structure > 64K. It might not have been enough to do a super fine grained implementation, but it was more than enough for the time period, and had any significant OS's used it in a meaningful way I'm sure it would have been extended when limitations here hit, as was everything else in the following products.

Oh, and also one could have reloaded the GDT, or swapped some number of LDTs at some boundary if needed. It wouldn't have really been much more disruptive in the 1980s than switching the page tables on task switch, like every modern OS.
Aren’t dress shoes without socks very sweaty and painful to wear?
Admin unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was banned in 2015
ApeFest attendees report 'extreme pain' and vision problems after event
Vero V Is Here
It's important to point out that the words "cryptocurrency" and "blockchain" aren't mentioned once in the Bitcoin whitepaper.
This is not an alternative to make* any more than some random half-baked build.sh is.

* gnu or otherwise, and why specify that in the first place anyway? If it did actually do a suitable job of replacing gnu make, would it not also suitably replace bsd or any other make? Is a person who says something like that a good source of ideas so deep and quality that they probably do improve upon those who created unix?

make may not be the final build system for the rest of eternity, but all this is, is "I don't really understand the full job make does, so here is something which only does a simpler job which I do understand, and I like python."
These tests show that standard climate models are rejected by time series data on global temperatures. Finally, we update and extend previous statistical analysis of temperature data (Dagsvik et al., 2020). Using theoretical arguments and statistical tests we find, as in Dagsvik et al. (2020), that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be strong enough to cause systematic changes in the temperature fluctuations during the last 200 years.
Monads are fairly simple as well if you use C#'s brilliantly chosen names SELECT and SELECTMANY for the two relevant maps.
There is definitely a lot of public bias amongst the two engines. UE4 couldn't solve this problem either (UE5 might, but Nanite isn't quite as "it just works" as you'd expect as of 5.1).

It definiitely has much to do with how UE's PR constantly shows off and ships new and exciting features that blend in the engine. Meanwhile, Unity has been criticized for some 6+ years minimum for its package management and lack of cohesion.
Except it doesn't scale to codebases the size of Facebook and Google.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_H._Moore
Smartphones have the capability that:

1. You can plug them into your PC and they act as a device (e.g. mass storage device for downloading your photos, drawing power to charge)

2. You can plug devices into them, and they'll act as a host (e.g. you can plug in a mouse if your touchscreen is broken, download the photos from your non-smartphone camera onto your smartphone, supply power to charge something else)

3. They'll do all this through a single port.

Hardly any normal people use these capabilities, as the cables are somewhat rare and the software support is somewhat patchy. But if you're buying a development board ready to make your own product, you can read this as "can be a usb host or device, whichever your product needs"
> wise.com

Wise is like Paypal 2.0. If you sneeze the wrong way, they'll freeze your account.
The point is that boundary between service and infrastructure is gradual in the digital world but discrete in physical world.

A digital infrastructure provider must sell a level of servicing for their products to be useable.
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear"
I have a 4.8kWh battery installed at home. That's usually good for 30-50% of my daily usage.

It charges from solar and cheap overnight electricity.
It would actually be Friday 13th every month, if start the month on a Sunday.
Risk avoidance. Extremists (!) are more likely to have dubios donors. And even if they're "normal" political figures or activists, their behaviour in public might damage the bank.

This being said this approach is a pretty wild one still, since people NEED banks, and there should be long duration till the expiration (except in cases of fraud, money laundering, ..)
I've seen people dump and share entire databases in JSON format at my job....
> Github allowed you to choose the VC and Mercurial and Git were available

You're not thinking about BitBucket are you? I thought Github was always git only?
This is the crux of it. Yes, we've reduced demand from electrical appliances, an made more efficient cars. But we've also closed all of our steel mills, aluminium smelters and other heavy industry. We still use those products, but the energy intensive processes are done elsewhere.

The UK "industrial" energy consumption today is 30% of what it was in 1970.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62334e14d3bf7...
The admin in question had previously been the subject of a Newsweek article:

"Manipulating Wikipedia to Promote a Bogus Business School"

https://www.newsweek.com/2015/04/03/manipulating-wikipedia-p...

That was back in 2015.
awesome, thanks.

so on the one hand, thats good as product will always be supported. But, will it get new updates without a company behind it?
I exclusively use Wise for dealing with the third world. I never keep a balance there, just instant transfers, as I don’t trust any pseudo banks like paypal to not freeze accounts for no reason.

Thank you for the thread link
Large scale international trade relied on standardized forms of money for thousands of years before the first coins were minted:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2105873118
If consistency is what you're after, then Word doesn't provide it. Even if you set the language to en-UK, it has a habit of conveniently forgetting every now and again and trying to change all your words back to US versions. This is why Word is changing language - its repeated gaslighting is at abusive level, and many people are too worn down by it to maintain their standards.
> And who likes to file bugs in Bugzilla?

Not only has it been years since I last have heard of bugzilla, I also really resented it! Moving to a modern infrastructure really improves accessibility for developers. For example, GHC (Haskell Compiler) moved to gitlab a few years ago and while previously it was really hard for me to understand the development process nowdays I can follow pull requests and tickets of features I am interested in without any problem. Previously the system was really complicated and, if I remember correctly, Phabricator, mailing list etc. based. Off putting as a newcomer.
Cool Continuum: Make Your Mark in the Arts
I have been quite happy with BitBucket. This is mostly from a UX perspective. The design is clean and simple. I’m using GitLab lately too, and my experience is the opposite. I can’t think of any webapp with a worse UX.
No one I know on disability is gaming the system or doing well. It is not enough money. No one I know wants to be on it either, they just would die otherwise. Some kind of ultra ignorant rock you’re under.
Almost all of those you get from just using the normal website with uBlock Origin and a browser lol. Not really exclusive features.
> I didn't need dependency graph much.

So you made a Make alternative that isn't a Make alternative because you never needed Make in the first place?
This was genuinely enlightening to read, comments too.
Here's a link to the WP article of the condition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photokeratitis
Forgiveness isn't necessary or even warranted though: forgetting conversely, is.

This is what I think TV tends to mess up: recurring characters are good for story or known quantities for production, but in real life? They don't need to exist at all.
As if Berghain is still a community venue, as opposed to a bunch of ur-capitalist hustlers selling the idea of community to lost and naive souls.

Community and scale do not mix. If the founders truly cared about community they would have wound the place up in about 2010 and done something new.

But once people experience a bit of success greed inevitably takes over…
: - not 1 + + ;

Disclaimer: I've never written forth, so this may not be valid for any particular forth implementation.
Sorry, double negative wasn't intentional.

I don't think individual show subscriptions would give you a cheaper price -- I don't see any way that's the result.

If there are 10 shows that cost $100 each to make, and 100 customers all pay for all shows, then that $10 per subscription.

If the same 100 customers split into 10 groups, and each group wants one show, then everyone still has to pay $10 to get that show made.

The overheads of providing you 10 shows vs 1 show aren't really significant in the big picture, as far as I understand.
https://theecologist.org/2016/feb/17/wind-power-windgas-chea...

The LCOE for nuclear power is roughly ~5x that of solar and wind.

If you assumed that the capex and running costs to electrolyze and store 1GWh of power in an underground cavern is roughly the same as it takes to produce it, and that it's about 50% efficient when roundtripped then that would make the stored wind and solar roughly 3/5ths of the cost of nuclear power.

This still makes it a lot more expensive than peaking with natural gas. Just because hydrogen storage is competitive with nuclear power doesn't mean it's economically competitive in general. Nuclear power is just way more expensive than people assume, and generally won't get built without a lot of really lavish subsidies (e.g. like Hinkley Point C getting paid 3-5x as much for the same kwh of electricity as everybody else).
>People are hurting, and they don't have strong communities to support them. Instead, folks who are hurting are huddling together online and perpetuating ill-adaptations

This kind of blase generalization is rather silly but all too common. It also presupposes that some general fix, preferably delivered by someone "who knows better" is in order. People in general are many different things at different times, each with their own variable causes and fixes that are mostly contextual in specific ways.

There's no shortage of community today, both of the literal physical kind and more recently even in a digital version, and if people are "hurting" for lack of community, then they're doing so no more than they would have in the past when establishing contact with others for friendship, shared ideas and love was much more labour intensive.

Also, if you think ill-adaptations, ignorant beliefs and paranoias are common today, you should take a closer look at most of history, in which entrenched interests of all kinds promoted all sorts of false beliefs, xenophobias, paranoias, nationalistic shit and other grossly dishonest beliefs across the board. They were pervasive, harder by far than today to counteract and much more widely entrenched. Large swathes of the population held these beliefs with terrible outcomes in many cases and if anything, it's something that's now decreasing like never before despite all the politically-biased screeching about fake news and "misinformation", often used as a justification for exactly the kind of limited, controlled and more centralized information distribution that used to REALLY promote enforced community and lies for the sake of political interests.

Even well-recognized psychological models have shown that people are smarter than ever, in general and in many specific ways. The Flynn effect has been well documented and though it has a number of likely causes, one of them is surely access to a far broader plurality of information and cultural exposure, with both the bad and the good (however you want to define those).

Moreover, at least now, whenever some idiotically wrong, self-serving or viciously dishonest belief gets promoted by certain groups, counter-groups can form to discredit it and allow for some genuine diversity of ideas, though many call this by another grossly simplistic but insult term, "polarization", which apparently should be eliminated so we can all believe supposedly correct things (though as defined by some specific self-interested agenda or another).

No thanks, I prefer a world in which someone who generalizes that people are hurting can't easily force them to connect, read, view and think in specific ways as decided by someone else until that authority smugly decides they're no longer hurting.
I know you're probably being tongue in cheek about there being no sun in the UK, but my domestic solar panels produce about 4 MegaWatt Hours each year.

https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2021/03/1-year-of-edent_solar-we-ar...

Rooftop solar is extremely viable in the UK.
Personally, I've never seen 'Agile' done well. Every project where we made good progress was engineer driven. We talked to customers about what they wanted so see and we created tasks and implemented them.

Every project managed by a dedicated servant-leader Six Sigma Kanban certified Scrum ninja-coach project has been a bureaucratic shitshow, with constant cargo culting to agile priniciples and forced ceremonies.
In the early days, the git UX was quite rough around the edges and Mercurial was a lot more idiot proof than git was. Git has evolved significantly since then.
So did Itanium, and in practice, so does x86.
Most supermarkets do not rent out a significant proportion of their floorspace to third party retails which they directly compete with? (and therefore have an arguably unfair advantage because they have full access to their sales data but not the other way around)
Good for you. Don't you think it's good to have a choice?
> It seems to be an emergent phenomenon created by the brain apparently because it's useful in some way.

People need to be more careful about that word "useful". Saying something is useful, is always implying a who it is useful for. Saying it's useful, but it's not useful for anyone, is as meaningless as saying something is useful, but it's not useful for anything.

(This was, as I recall, one of Kant's "categories of reason").

So by saying the brain creates something for a purpose, you're already assuming that the brain is a thing, and it's a thing that wants things. I'm not saying that's wrong, but given how hard it seems to not make circular arguments with it, maybe it isn't actually an empirical question.
Since then both had lots of optimizations put into it to work outside their original intended domains. Facebook did a lot to make Mercurial performance on very large repositories tenable. Microsoft did the same for Git to allow their Windows developers to work with Git, which apparently was initially not able to do common operations at all at acceptable speed.

But those are big company problems and I suspect the caveats, tradeoffs and solutions matter a lot less for the 99 % of other VCS users.
Isn't this where documentation of actual KYC would come in? "Flagged for reason X; Overridden by local manager - follows 10 lines of CYA justification"? Normally that's good enough for administrations.

The second time it's flagged for reason X+1, include 10 lines from rank 2 manager.
Hi Kyle (hello again), thanks for being so transparent with this.

I suspect this is a moment where news are looking for a scapegoat / villain from the AV sector, and your team is an easy target given what has happened recently.

I believe that transparency is the right way to address issues and concerns. Please keep doing that.
For that reason alone, yes.

But not for the reasons that correlate, such as education, tooling.
Funny thing is Finnish Posti (ex. Itella) kinda does it. They have online service where you sometimes get your mail "scanned" before it actually arrives. Probably due to them actually printing it (in better quality somehow?) and delivering to you.
I don't see why the discussion centres on TWh, not TW. The former means something only when a time-frame is stated (per year, in this case). To avoid confusion, that interval ought to be stated in every phrase containing the unit. Which it isn't.

This is needlessly confusing. It's not as though W is a confusing unit. Readers have an idea of the wattage of their lights, their stoves, their furnaces.
Tesla to build 25,000-euro car at German plant
Sure, but that's not how consumers measure "finished". By that logic, Binding of Issac wasn't even in Alpha state when it launched in 2011. Since it got its latest update this year. Meanwhile, Sonic 2006 launched once, never got updates, and was buried for 15 years before Sega loosened up. It was by all accounts "finished", in the worst way.

unpolished =/= unfinished.
'This season saw 7w/kg become the new norm for grand tour contending climbers. Classics champions pushed 5.5w/kg for hours on end.' Armstrong and co were doing 7w/kg. Hint hint
Being subject to such UV lights without my knowledge and waking up in the dead of night to my eyes burning is a new fear I'd never expect to develop. A nice reminder of how important combating negligence is.
"Musk" and "witty", so I guess it calls you a paedophile?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50695593
It's a cool concept. Just Google it and join your web beta.
Well, that's actually the default for WireHub. Routing between peers (ie their generated AllowedIPs configs) by default only refers to the IPs of the two peers and you can use an Interface per Device per Network, so that you'd need to explicitly enable the relevant WireGuard interface for each network.

But, re-reading your comment, as long as your networks are on different CIDRs you could use a single WireHub interface to refer to more than one device/networks. As I said, traffic by default is routed to the specified peer's Address not the whole network (eg, 192.168.x.y/24) nor the internet (0.0.0.0/24).
If hg cli was butt raving mad, it would still be considered "saner" than git.

If git was an equivalent modern appliance, it would be against the Geneva convention.

I give Git this, it's a bit faster.
As you say it is a first step - let's wait and see
What you are describing is not a carnivore diet, not even paleo diet (yoghurt!).

To try carnivore elimination diet, you should eat nothing else than beef, salt and water for at least 30 days.
I'm pretty sure the price has gone up because Amazon charges a huge markup/fees.

If you buy it from the source, it's now $9.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003302259707.html
Useful from the point of view of helping an animal satisfy its needs, so allowed to survive by natural selection? Perhaps it's just a inevitable by-product of certain types of thought.
Power: A Radical View [pdf]
A great take on Spinoza viz the current disinformation/misinformation/propaganda debate. Check out especially the last chapter and its beautiful ending.
It is relevant though, as the author points out, because you can use this to reduce your "deep sleep" power consumption since RTC still runs after SoC power off. I don't know who is using a Pi 5 in low power applications given it is fairly power hungry compared to other practical options, but it's still good to know if you are.
Phorge has seized the torch, and it looks promising as a Phab successor.
Agree. And the inability to log in is weird. The user could always not log in - although I understand them not putting in free work on features they don't believe in.
Nitpick, but that quote doesn't explain why not move to mercurial (although I think we all know why)
It is a massive database, but not in the classic sense. I believe your comment is a projection.
Lights, maybe, but I doubt they do for their stoves. And “furnaces” (a en-US term which I guess is approximate to a gas boiler) are nearly always measured in terms of the units of gas they consume in the UK, not their power output.
If this is a translation of functions into CLI commands, there are enough of such crates. Old package `argh` and now `yaargh`[1] also translate functions into CLI commands in a very neat way, with just a decorator, and they don't need an external executable in the system to run, just `python your_file.py`.

Makefile keeps dependency graph. I had a 100-entry 300-line Makefile, with graphviz drawing charts of it, and kept a huge, year-long project on my own, organized and running all partial updates smoothly.

[1] https://github.com/ekimekim/yaargh
I would recommend using Obtainium[1] over F-Droid.

Obtainum downloads APKs directly from the repository's releases page, for example the GitHub releases page.

Why not use F-Droid?
"Due to their process of building apps, apps in the official F-Droid repository often fall behind on updates. F-Droid maintainers also reuse package IDs while signing apps with their own keys, which is not ideal as it gives the F-Droid team ultimate trust. Additionally, the requirements for an app to be included in the official F-Droid repo are less strict than other app stores like Google Play, meaning that F-Droid tends to host a lot more apps which are older, unmaintained, or otherwise no longer meet modern security standards."[2]

[1]: https://github.com/ImranR98/Obtainium#readme
[2]: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/android/#f-droid
Outside the organised ai bubble that's what it's called I'm afraid.
I've seen tens of millions of market data events from a single day of trading encoded in JSON and used in various post-trade pipelines.
Yeah, hardly anyone cared what Linux used (a few years earlier before Bitkeeper it was mostly just patches).

But Rails was a very early Github user, and the big Rails usage upswing coincided with that and helped drive it. I was a Python and PHP dev at the time, and that other stuff mostly predated Github and was scattered across all kinds of places. Whereas Rails and Github both kicked off about the same time, and practically no Rails devs or libraries used anything else.

It was that fast growth and hype combined with the network effects of Github that drove git usage rather than what Linux used. The Linux contribution workflow was also pretty alien to Github focused webdevs.