skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m pretty sure that they absolutely know that banks make mistakes.

But if you’ve never been on the other side providing customer service, you may be astonished at the systemic fraud/illegal attempts happening constantly.

When I did CS at Blizzard for WoW at least half our work was dealing with compromised accounts (essentially by gold sellers), and then a good deal of “I’ve been hacked!” tickets were by the thieves trying to double steal from an account.

To put that in perspective, it was $100,000s or $1,000,000s in CS costs per month (at just Blizzard) to help customers who were victims of a large scale full time industry (not individuals, organisations) which compromises accounts to make a living.

People banned for confirmed cheating with 3rd party programs would make support requests repeatedly in the hope they’d come across an agent who “makes a mistake and accidentally unbans them”, occasionally you would see lots of them trying the same strategy or telling the same story since they saw a forum post of someone who said “this worked for me”.

Legitimate mistakes happen, but they’re like 1% of the time, the rest of the time it’s systemic attempted fraud.

So the person you’re replying to is most likely aware of this reality and says that “complaining on forums” is most often by people who aren’t telling the full story.

Hence them saying, if your story is legit, take it to the right place to get help, otherwise you’re looking like a just another fraudster (who do this systematically) trying to game the system in some way.
But the results are indicative of what it is, and they fall short even if your only criteria is usefulness. It can't tell the difference between truth and falsity, let alone do more interesting things like reflecting on an experience, which our brains, however they might work, can. The more interesting question is why are people like you personally offended when someone is less than thrilled with a machine that has been programmed to do linear algebra over a large input? You seem to think that that mechanism in itself has a potential to do magic and that other people who reject that are a threat.
Has Texas agreed to adopt the strictest gun control measures in the US sates?

I assume you understand the question re: Schengen.
crenshaw mostly just emits pushes and pops; he recommends a simpler version of that rotating fifo technique (just spilling deeply nested values onto the stack so you get a performance cliff, instead of pushing old values out of the fifo) but doesn't actually show it

in ur-scheme i just pushed and popped, getting performance much less terrible than i expected, but still probably a third of the performance the rotating fifo register allocator would give
The diagram does not make this clear at all, but the big circle is the orbit of the Moon. The Earth is only 12,756 km in diameter, and the tick marks are 200,000 km apart. If drawn to scale on that diagram, it would be 2.7 pixels wide.
No, but they have done deals, something Lina Khan said she should consider more when she was getting roasted at that congressional hearing.

The FTC has continued doing deals the entire time. They're just not covered in the tech news because they don't affect tech.
FWIW, it’s the same at FAANG
23/24

but there was a few I just got lucky, Clédial got me because I didn't expect a drug to have an accent.
I almost missed a (remote and international) interview on Monday as DST ended on that exact day. Honestly, DST seems like such a crazy system coming from someone who lives in the tropics, like instead of changing schedules you change the clock?
I recall a story of a young police woman who enticed an autistic highschool guy to buy drugs. He was arrested for that. If that's not entrapment, I don't know what is.
It's a state bridge for state traffic that happens to be in a small rural town.

The traffic on the bridge isn't related to to the size of the closest town.

The funding for the bridge isn't neccesarily related to funding available for the town.

This is related to other national infrastructure questions that saw Federal money going toward the upkeep of failing bridges in particular states and counties that were dragging down transport reliability across the USofA.
We get from ‘Elon is evil’ to ‘there are tweets that inspire dislike’ so fast. Thanks for playing, comrade.

> If you think following a guy who tweets shit like that says nothin about you good for you.

I go outside, so I’m perfectly aware that it means nothing at all.

>keep sucking elon off, have fun. But not all of us are so blinded by worship.

It’s past your bedtime. Go back to reddit already.
i hope you enjoy it
I hate both types of organizations. I think I hate the rapid tech switching even more than the business focused one. There's a lot to hate about languages like COBOL, but honestly it looks awesome create neat code with actual documentation and design documents, that will just work for decades with minor upgrades and changes.

Durable systems are gone. Longterm support is 12-18 months. Iterate or die is how it works now, I guess.
Caden's amazing! We're trying to enable users to monetize in a different manner, beyond "selling their data off as a one-time profit opportunity"; moreso, we're gearing ourselves more towards allowing people to profitably drop data into AI companies in a way that minimizes initial risk for the startups, and then reap the rewards as they grow.
May the old team thrive and may the brand fail
The irony being that Itanium is basically a SPARC64 on steroids; both wide, both used huge register windows, and both were in order. the only difference being that Itanium exposed a lot of the superscalar bits to the programmer. I still have no clue why an HP shop would be using Solaris boxes, alas...
Google Bard introduces "Human reviewers," sparking privacy concerns
This is why I think we need to push for destroying the journals and transforming conferences (to be specifically about networking, not publishing venues). Their purpose really is a fuzzy metric for the academic bureaucrats who are using them as a signal to determine if a paper is good or not rather than relying on their departments, where accountability exists. But of course this is only a small part of the metric hacking and Goodhart's Hell, because we need to say fuck off to the publish or perish shit. I'm in ML and trust me, you don't want to be where we're at. Publishing multiple times a year, chasing hype (because if you don't you get rejected), and overselling papers (you just can't publish groundbreaking work in a few months. Sorry, it ain't gonna be novel but if you don't make it look novel you're gonna get rejected). The treadmill has made me hate academia with a passion (still love research though)
> This website uses yummy cookies.

ZAHFjkdahflkasd

> We are 100% HIPPA Compliant

sdajfkghlkhgfjhlgasldhjkfgblhj

(this website is a meme, who would ever believe it??)
I just hope Link says his catchphrase, "Well, excuuuuse me, Princess!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzfXxkHrIBM
>AI though promises to be the universal automation, i.e. it can do any job.

An AI can't do any job that requires a body, so clearly that isn't true.

If you mean mental jobs, this could be true in the future, but right now, it's hard to say. You can imagine scenarios where an AI does 95% of a job but a human is still required for the last 5% (without which the first 95% is useless).

These tools are recent, but not THAT recent. GPT3 is nearly 4 years old, Copilot is 2 years old, ChatGPT is a year old, GPT4 is 8 months old. No large-scale employment changes resulting from AI are visible so far.
They’ve not only always been able to do that, they explicitly had to go out of their way to make it any other way.

That it is delegated to the local towns is because that’s what they (as in the state and the towns) wanted.

And it’s likely to stay that way unless extreme effort is put into changing it, because otherwise the local folks will usually get very angry, as you’re taking away their self determination and ability to control their immediate surroundings. And everywhere is local somewhere.

So why don’t you ask the state legislatures? They’re the ones who have always been in control here on this topic.
Does the current legislation ready for that kind of model to work?
alternatively you could take unbalanced bearish positions, like too many at the money put options, everyone can start thinking about the ways that becomes profitable by noticing the bear thesis and rooting for that for a little while.

then people could see which thesis is stronger and more probable, the bullish or the bearish ones.
For my personal site I run Caddy in a Docker container along with other containers using a compose file. By doing it this way, getting things up when moving to a new instance is as simple as running `docker compose up`. Also making changes to the config or upgrading Caddy version on deployments is the same as a other services since they're all containers. So it's easy to add CI/CD and have it re-deploy Caddy whenever the config changes and there's no need for extra GitHub Actions .yaml's. Setup as code like this also documents all the dependencies and I think it might be helpful in the future.

Having said that, for serious business, this setup doesn't make sense. It possibly takes more work to operate as container when the gateway runs on a dedicated instance.
Gotta have the undercoating
A file is "of a type" if there exists some agent (program X or human H) that creates/writes such files, and whereby there exists some agent (program Y or could be Y==X or human I or could be I==H) that reads/modifies such files, and whereby the entire contents of such files can be made use of or understood in a useful/meaningful way; and other files not of the type's contents either can't be made use of meaningfully nor updated. Some file types may be sub- or super-sets of other file types (ex: .C source files are .TXT files, but .TXT source files are not necessarily .C files, they could be .CSV files) And files could be streams.

might wish to discuss files containing type information, and data/value information both, thus numerous but different valued files can all be of the same type.

you can get fancier if you want and talk about valid C source files or C source files which contain bugs, etc.

you could consider a file "weakly or adhoc typed" if there is only one or a pair of agents that use that type, and "strongly or standard typed" if there are numerous "different/distinguished" agents that "rely" on that file type.

this was off the top of my head
Jupyter Notebook Diff Reviews
Well, I interpreted the OP's question as a personal one, and this is just my answer from thinking about it recently. So I don't think "we" have raised the bar. This is just what I personally think.

But to me, I just don't really relate to your point in the second paragraph. My two year old does this agency thing just fine - he wakes up every morning and starts making decisions about what he wants to do from moment to moment - despite being "less intelligent" by these metrics like getting a high score on the GMAT or whatever. But that kind of intelligence that even a two year old human has, to me, that just feels more like what I think of as "general" intelligence, more so than "just" an amazing pattern matching machine.
The author says at the very beginning this is the book he could have read at the start of his career, so yeah.
Amen to that! This matches my lived experience. Every time I share a surprising or specific technical detail like that, inside I'm hoping, begging, someone will ask me how I know, so I can recall and share the tale of the months of my time, and, honestly, my cleverness expended to win that knowledge.

(Also I don't know why you're downvoted?)

Anyway, great article. I didn't know division wasn't constant time, but ew, division, old busted. cool cats multiply by a constant and shift. :)
It is a great representation of the average article written about Itanium. I think the register made most of its revenue from articles about Itanium, where the authors had no clue about what they were talking about.

Not defending Itanium. But the average article on computer architecture has been garbage for decades now, it's fascinating.
Bezos looks to be a "very keen cyclist" to develop and maintain that level of musculature at his age - probably at least TRT doses of testosterone. Compare how he looked in the '90s vs now, look at arm vascularity and neck size. Not likely to be using HGH though, his head hasn't changed shape much compared to e.g. Joe Rogan, who does use HGH and has a big head because of it.
The issue is made so much worse because banks and the like are willing to withdraw money from someone's account with just the SSN and some other basic information. And the banks aren't held accountable when they give your money to a scammer. Rather they blame you for identity theft, and the government sides with the banks.
Electrically gated molecular thermal switch
21/24.

I’ll atone by re-reading now.
I think that's sort of what I was trying to say with this comment. Rather than separating agency from intelligence, just pointing out that to me it seems like the current (already-amazing) systems don't seem all that close to being able to do this, to me.
>But the results are indicative of what it is, and they fall short even if your only criteria is usefulness

There isn't a testable definition of general intelligence that GPT-4 fails that a chunk of humans also wouldn't.

If they fall short then so do people. Guess those people aren't generally intelligent then according to you.

>It can't tell the difference between truth and falsity

Yes, it very much can.

GPT-4 logits calibration pre RLHF - https://imgur.com/a/3gYel9r

Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback - https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14975

Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Words - https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14334

Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know - https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05221

The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets - https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06824

>The more interesting question is why are people like you personally offended

I'm not offended about anything.
Something in the style of Into The Spiderverse or Netflix's Arcane or some aspects of the recent Namona or Puss in Boots. There's so much that could be done, especially if Nintendo hooked in a good and creative studio.
That makes no sense. Alpha was horrible in terms of power consumption.
Are there any openers that are just Z-Wave and that's it? No WiFi no company owned cloud.

Or should people just get a dry-contact Z-Wave relay and do it themselves?
your vision is sounder then

one true way to prevent counterfeiters from circumventing your verification would be to give each plug a unique code, then have the device send off to your manufacturer servers to check the unique code is valid, which the device then remembers. you'd also have to either permanently lock the plug to one device, or have some pretty invasive location data to ensure the codes were genuinely unique though. either way it requires network connectivity, servers, etc

alternatively, you could have a long and complex call and response behaviour, perhaps dictated by a deterministic neural net. this would certainly be hard to counterfeit, but not impossible.
Wow you must know more than me, oh wise one /s

I’ve been in crypto for 13 years now, I’m sure any day now Bitcoin will hit 0 and you’ll be proven right, and all the yield farms and defi will collapse, sure sure.
> Calls to action are speech.

Yes, technically, but come on now. You're being disingenuous.

Let's forgo the semantic bullshit which is a pretty shoddy attempt at making a point to begin with.

Instead of saying 'freedom of speech', since you want to be so technical, we can say 'freedom to express any opinion'. The USA has significantly more freedom for people to 'express any opinion' than other first world countries.

> I don't know how much simpler I can make it.

You're not making anything 'simple', you're making a disingenuous point to try and support an even more, forgive me, asinine point that isn't really correct except in a meaningless semantic way. You're ignoring the spirit of what is being discussed and acting like you've refuted a claim; you haven't even come close.

Why don't you actually try and address the claim made instead of playing silly semantic games in lieu of an argument?
Ordered it, thanks. I saw it in the article too.

Glad people like this exist.
> Banning it at this point just makes it so that only the criminals have access to it

I would argue that this isn't really the case; the number of people who have the ability to create something at the level of ChatGPT or to make use of what's out there right now properly, is really quite small.

In that sense, if we were to utterly ban the tech, right now, it would probably be sufficient to prevent criminals from using it for most of the things it will be used for criminally, 5 years from now. It's too niche of a field, in its infancy, that if it were utterly and completely shut down, the cartels would not pick up the tab to single-handedly do it themselves.

Obviously that won't happen though, nor am I advocating for it. Personally I think the good done will outtweigh the bad many, many times over.
My favorite was "North Korean propaganda or TED talk soundbite?"

There are a few articles about it but the actual quiz doesn't seem to be up anymore.
Nice find. This pioneering atomic beam experiment is the basis for cesium-beam atomic clocks, even today. Among other later innovations, I. I. Rabi added magnets and a microwave EM field for quantum state selection, and Norman Ramsey discovered how to optimize the beam's interaction with the field for the best clock performance.

The professor in this video, Jerrold Zacharias, also famously spent a lot of time and money trying to build a cesium fountain clock back in the 60s. He never succeeded, but NIST and other researchers eventually did (https://www.nist.gov/pml/time-and-frequency-division/time-re...).
+1 to this.

Love Rust and everything about it.

However, to script something small/casual I would like all the rest of Rust but with automatic garbage collection, without having to worry about lifetimes.
That's amazing to implement a full interpreter for VBA.

I would imagine a lot of the type resolution are redundant. E.g. +, -, *, and / would have the same type resolution for numbers. Those can reuse the same type resolver. May be + also work on string. Then call the string type resolver on it in addition to see if it can be resolved.

Anyway, kudos for the amazing work.
We're seeing green lights from both American and EU legislation. We're also keeping ethicality at the forefront of design, and going to try and vet startups on the platform.
Having recently listened to the Lord of the Rings audiobooks (the read by Andy Serkis ones) I thought this was going to be about escaping into fantasy novels as a way of keeping oneself sane without having to resort to drugs. I also found them to be one of the only effective means of occupying my mind as I was trying to fall asleep so that I didn't ruminate myself into insomnia, which of course would leave me in a worse mood the next day.
Ohio votes to legalize marijuana for recreational use
Is there any way to debug requests?
It works that way because in the 1980s that was the only way to make it work at all, and it still works that way because being able to do the equivalent of an HTTP OPTIONS preflight for money is actually quite useful.
Yeah, wow. It’s been years since I read and watched, but I expected this to be challenging for the uninitiated. That crushed me. I guess I just lost a bunch of nerd cred.

It’s bizarre that I did about as well at getting drug names correct, and I can’t say I’m well versed in those.
Parent's suggestion is to accept the eIDAS certs only within the EU.
In JS, without worker threads or similar situations, you don't have real race conditions. Therefore, concurrency primitives like mutexes, read/write locks, condition variables, barriers, semaphores, etc. are not necessary. Or Go-like channels.

You can use a global variable and it will be fine because it won't be accessed simultaneously.

So then how is this not cargo culting Go? imitating the observable parts of Go without truly understanding what it does?
Thank you for this lol
Two Letter Dot-Coms and Who Owns Them
Interesting to see a bunch of random small businesses, good thing they bought them early :)
Transactions that don't involve latency in knowing the final amount also don't offer the same opportunity for chicanery.
It's so interesting that Toyotism, with it's "the supply chain is a partnership, not an exploitation opportunity" idea succeeded there.
Did you do anything else special in getting it to correctly reference the documentation?

Now that you brought this up, I could really use this ability with some 600 pages of documentation I have.
The most effective place I've worked had a fixed allocation to technical debt work (25%) and let engineering agree how to prioritise that. Want to rewrite it in Rust? If you get buy-in from the rest of the technical team to say that that's more important than sorting out the database schema or whatever you can do that, but you'd better be able to do it piece by piece and keep delivering business value the whole time.

Theoretically someone who understood both the business and the technical side of things ought to be able to weigh up individual tasks from both sides and figure out which was higher priority. But in practice that seems very hard - you'd need both intimate knowledge of both domains and immunity to organisational politics. Explicitly adjusting that high-level dial (so maybe the 25% becomes 50% when it's a codebase you want to publish/reuse, or 0% when it's an EOL project that you're just running until it falls apart) might be the best you can do in practice.
But what would she find one? Go to the second result on Google?
Most people would never be able to find a real hitman since it would require taking very obvious risks to find a real hitman - and would just give up.
They're not very specific and quite open to interpretation. As a left leaner here in Norway, I find at least the last two to be quite problematic and a huge red flag. They make me feel significantly less welcome.
None of the drug names sounded like Tolkien characters to me. I guess native English speakers are at a disadvantage, because they are more likely to consider the names as they would be pronounced in English. The intended pronunciation is usually close to Classical Latin, which means that pronouncing the names in any other European language is likely closer to the truth. And when you pronounce the names in that language, Tolkien characters and drugs tend to sound different.
I guess I better be more careful about the websites I use to find hitmen!
This is also the same reason why calling upon European citizens to see the negatives of the law and voice their concerns about it isn’t gonna work.

Agree partly the GDPR though, since it requires disclosure about how collected data is gonna be used.
> An AI can't do any job that requires a body, so clearly that isn't true.

No reason they wouldn’t be provide physical bodies eventually.
If you got a good score, was it due to drug or tolkien knowledge? Or evenly both?
So 24/24
I think the OP was saying that your prior employer would feel entitled to the code you write after you left their employment, not the code you wrote while you were there.
Consumer Bureau Seeks to Supervise Digital Payment Apps
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau wants to extend its watchdog powers to cover digital wallets and payment apps run by companies like Apple, Google, PayPal and Block, which do not have traditional banking operations.
Sildenafil isn't an antidepressant.