skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Have you tried ChatGPT Code Interpreter aka Advanced Data Analysis mode?

That's the thing that can write and then execute Python code against files you upload to it.

I've had great results using it to decipher weird binary formats, since it can try things out and iterate on them.
This is why there's so much of a push for bus rapid transit in my city.

Unfortunately, this has disadvantages as well:

- lack of enforcement for bus lanes

- needing to share travel lanes with personal cars occasionally, making keeping the timetable harder

- low cost also means no long-term permanency. would you want to invest in transit-oriented development around a platform that could go away anytime?
ReactOS "Open-Source Windows" Improving UEFI Boot, DirectX Work and NT6 API Prep
Will be shifting all meetings back by 30 minutes. I would want to do the full hour, but having our first meeting be at "8:30" would be painful for the team (conflicts with school schedule). On the next day lights savings time reset, those meetings will move forward by 30 minutes.

Not quite a full sync to GMT, but partial. I somewhat hope a movement takes off where when the clocks change, everyone changes their business/working/school hours to negate the difference.
Which cities? And what parts of these cities I’m pretty sure public transit represents the lions share of trips in Manhattan or London zones 1-2
I agree with you about landscape oriented displays, especially with 16:9 laptops. It's like looking at the world through a gun port. At home, I have two 24"displays, one portrait and one landscape which covers all bases.
Transit looks really expensive until you start looking into how expensive cars are including roads, cars, maintenance, gas, insurance, etc.

Car insurance alone in small city is what ~= 80$/month/driver * 1 million drivers = approximately 1 billion dollars per year.

When people drive less they don’t just use less fuel and save on maintenance etc, but also get into fewer accidents driving down insurance. People also avoid traffic tickets, and cities need fewer traffic cops etc. The city’s air quality improves which reduces respiratory issues saving not just lives but sick days etc. Local property becomes more valuable and congestion shrinks.

The costs comes out of cities budgets, but the savings largely goes to individuals.
People want the same for TV shows and movies that they already have with music. They want a spotify like experience but with movies. One subscription where they can access everything they want. This is how you could make it easier.

I am not saying it is realistic as the hosting and production costs are just not the same. And exclusives are a standard way to attract subscribers.

If I remember correctly as well while music has consolidated, the revenue artists get from it is much lower than what they used to get with the old model. I can see why that does not really motivate the industry to provide a more convenient solution. Spotify showed them that it might hurt their bottom line so why would they go that route.
From outside, with no knowledge of this "ELM Controversy", this is all very confusing.

I love the ELM Architecture. Why is there a problem if it is implemented in another language?

I'd think any functional language could implement the ELM Architecture, and thus be 'native', or more integrated into that particular languages ecosystem, and this would offer benefits beyond trying to integrate ELM into each individual ecosystem.

And doing this re-implementation, would in no way be a comment on the ELM founder.

Also, Doesn't Linus say "NO", quite a bit with Linux? Why jump on the ELM guy for doing same thing.
certainly agree. but busses at least dont have the associated surface costs of parking, and you can shunt them into tunnels without having to transfer like seattle used to do
This is something that JustWatch is useful for.
The tom scott one was one example I was thinking of... With the sponsor segment clipped out, that video lacks a LOT of context.

The main one I was thinking of was Senpai Gaming. He does reviews of microphones and streamer equipment. He just released a video of the new Shure SM7dB mic where he does the sponsor read on the new mic.

Recently, he reviewed the new Elgato teleprompter. During which he read the ad read from the teleprompter as a means of demonstrating how the eyecontact looks/feels while reading text from the prompter. It feels like a legit test for a teleprompter to be able to demo it as such. The problem is. He says that he is going to demo 4 things about the prompter and the first one is simply reading text. And then he starts to say "And we're going to do that by sharing the sponsor of today's video"... But it sponsorblock cuts it as "And we're going to" and then it cuts to point 2. Had sponsorblock cut that after he said "sponsor" I would have at least known what was going on, but a random mid sentence cut... I feel like the Sponsorblock contributors self select to be the most rabid anti-sponsor people out there. Sponsorships are pure evil and we shouldn't have to even hear words next to the sponsorship. I understand why NewPipe disagrees and wants to differentiate between good and bad and not just "everything bad".
And a deeply deeply biased court system that has been nothing but pro-business for ages.

Borkism has been the law of the land & figuring out to how take a judicial system which has been winnowed to just a small narrow view & make it reconsider mandates it used to have, long long ago, requires not just good casework but courts that have re-developed some appetite for ruling in businesses.
To quote just a few sentences afterwards:

> One of the greatest threats comes from inhalation of particles, so much effort has been devoted to production of low-dust forms of the pigment.

With lead, there is no safety assumption that one can make. Zero. You never know if someone will expose the paint to acid, basic or otherwise corrosive solutions, if a child ingests it, or what happens with it in the human body.
On the importance of being backed up
> Of course, it is worth remembering that Word isn't just available in English. It supports around 100 languages, including European Spanish and Latin-American Spanish.

(from TFA)
This is an article about optimizing a JSON parser in Go.

As always, try to remember that people usually aren't writing (or posting their talks) specifically for an HN audience. Cheney clearly has an audience of Go programmers; that's the space he operates in. He's not going to title his post, which he didn't make for HN, just to avoid a language war on the threads here.

It's our responsibility to avoid the unproductive language war threads, not this author's.
I know we're talking about LLMs deobfuscating stuff here, but it turns out that JSFuck is trivially decodable.
https://enkhee-osiris.github.io/Decoder-JSFuck/
So why don't you simply explain a few lawful use cases that are impossible with an ordinary database? Just do that and case closed, you win.
Service also randomly halts because of software failures.
There are a grand total of 192 Ford F150s currently registered in the UK, a substantial proportion of which aren't actually registered for road use. Mid-size pickups like the Ford Ranger, the Volkswagen Amarok and the Mistubishi L200 are significantly more common; these vehicles stand out as huge in a UK context, but aren't particularly big by American standards.
I’m Dutch, and the ways autocorrect changes my language, and I guess the German language as well, is not so subtle. We have a rule that when something is one “thing” like a “biophysics group”, we make it one word (Biofysicagroep). But almost any form of autocorrect will split these words. I’m really tired of correcting it all the time and I guess many others with me.
True, but neither does maintaining the grid
It's not about out-of-thin-air, but it's relying on other criticisms of out-of-thin-air to motivate why the new model is supposedly better.
Ohgodwhy. Now I won't even click on the IA link because I don't want to be a burden for them.
I imagine hectoseconds would be "fun" when dealing with timezones.
No, yes(ish) and maybe.

75" TV. Big living room, middle age.
Nothing like poking machine code directly into memory, and when it crashes it takes the whole thing down and you lose everything. Learned really quick that way! Great times, part of why I've always enjoyed a deep understanding what's behind a technology.
Yes buses are a good compromise, especially since you can close the other lanes and give up the space for humans
It's great to know that this is a thing! I had hopefully assumed the real-time clock was on a supercap or something.

It's almost forgiveable with RTCs, since they're generally not required for the main device functionality and RTC reference circuits invariably use coin cells. I've got an auto-darkening welding helmet, with its main power being supplied with the same planned obsolescence nonsense, despite having a solar panel on the front! It suddenly just stopped working, and my usual course of take-apart-the-broken-thing was thwarted due to its case being ultrasonically welded together. Only when I stumbled upon a random Youtube video of someone replacing the batteries in theirs did I get the oomph to pull the thing apart to change the batteries.
2000 years, 4000 years… humans make up things and as long as they’re not visibly and instantly harmful they persist.

If it turns out matzah ball soup prevents Alzheimer’s then millions of Jewish mothers will say “see! Our people knew it all along”, but it would be pure coincidence.
Work for cruel dictator's insane pet project steered by McKinsey.

Perfect jobs available for a slacker who just wants to get paid. More you slack and sabotage the project, more positive your contribution for the society will be. Be one man McKinsey consultant and bullshit for money.

Or maybe just work for your startup idea while pretending to work for the company. Leech off until you get fired.
If you're building a library you either need to explicitly call out your limits or do streaming.

I've pumped gigs of jaon data, so a streaming parser is appreciated. Plus streaming shows the author is better at engineering and is aware of the various use cases.

Memory is not cheap or free except in theory.
Have to agree. Recently decided to try out Python instead. Everyone at work wanted Python, it's popular, so why not give it a shot. In constant regret, missing the type checking in F#.
I think carbon steel is better than stainless. It can be seasoned to almost Teflon levels of non-stickness, just by burning some cooking oil, the seasoning is maintained by cooking, often comes pre-seasoned, is cheap (there’s no reason to buy an expensive carbon steel pan! Get one from a restaurant supplier)
To be fair, you did say “you” and “your”, inviting the reader to assume you are writing specifically for them.
Another really useful societal benefit of AI.
I'm not much of a leader. But we've already done pretty much what we can. Most of our stuff is 2nd or 3rd hand. The vast majority of our trips are done by walking or bicycle. Our AC is set to 80 in the summer.

Even people I know who claim to care about climate change don't care to change. AC set to 72. Heating set to 70. New laptops every year. Driving to save 5 minutes. 6k square foot house full of crap.

I have had some neighbors notice and comment that "it's great" that we do some of these things (mainly not using the car very much). But they still don't care enough to change. Bleh.
I'm surprised not to see any mention of bacteria and funghi being blown into the air. Guess we'll have to wait for climate change and valley fever (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37632653) to do their thing.
They're related. Requiring sb ∪ rf to be acyclic is indeed one solution to the OOTA problem, but is arguably too heavy a hammer.

The other thing to say about OOTA is that it's usually referred to as a purely theoretical problem, but it is possible to imagine compiler optimization that would implicate it, for example using the storage location of the atomic to store a temporary value, knowing that it will be written later in program order anyway. That would be a perfectly reasonable thing to do in sequential code, but obviously a bad idea for atomics. Even so, experience shows that when it comes to letting compiler writers do optimizations that are obviously a bad idea, we have to explicitly and unambiguously forbid it in the spec.
Hard disagree, the primary limitation is availability of energy. There is no path to 100% solar + wind + storage without mass deindustrialization.

Nuclear would stop being expensive if it was committed to. Building 1 bespoke plant avery few decades is not a good approach.
>Difference being, of course, the fact that the young aspiring authors are fully capable of coming up with novel ideas without having to copy the contents of 90 billion textbooks cover-to-cover.

So only scale matters? The fact is individuals almost never come up with novel ideas. Can you imagine having to pay someone for that smiling sun you drew in kindergarten?

> then humans already have to get proper access to the works of other authors.

What the hell does that even mean? I mean, please go read "The Right to Read" by RMS. In your mind if I go to my friends house and read a book, I've committed a crime. If I let someone borrow that book, I've too committed another crime.

You've embraced the right to make a profit and put it far above the needed idealism of sharing information as what makes societies grow. But in your desire to profit you are going to create the framework of greed that will allow massive corporations to crush us just as effectively.
> A fetus is (not) a person

This question is the crux of the debate, and has always been. But in my experience, many pro-choice advocates are reluctant to address it directly; they prefer to talk about "rights" and "personal beliefs." Probably because, when you consider it seriously, the answer is inescapable.
Fed currently supporting US banks to the tune of ~$110bn, following failure of 3 medium-sized banks: SVB, Silvergate, Signature. Many/most US banks are technically bankrupt at MTM asset prices, because of losses on bonds, as the fed raises interest rates (ZIRP was not forever?). Some claim they will Hold To Maturity (HTM), others are grabbing Fed money with both hands to cover MTM losses:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/H41RESPPALDKNWW
> By that argument, conjunction is also called "addition".

Yeah, I just noticed:

a and b = a + b - (a or b)

Or with probability

P(a and b) = P(a) + P(b) - P(a or b)
I don't think simply washing rice appreciably reduces arsenic levels. It's just to get rude rid of the loose rice flour that grinds off during shipping/handling
This is the problem with self driving cars. A human has the awareness to pull over when it's appropriate and also is able to recognize they just ran over somebody and it's best to stop completely. But AVs seem to just have a dumb if/else statement to control this behavior (yes, I know it is actually more complex than that, I work in this space. But that is how they behave).

Driving is infinitely complex. It's becoming increasingly clear that the current approach to AVs not up to the challenge.
Take a step back and ask yourself why the government should define "extremism" in the first place.
However, in the case of Meta, if you are a Facebook user they are likely using your likes, friends, any personal information you give them, the content of your posts/comments/private messages to better target your ads. So you, in fact, agree with this ban.
Private Estimates, Public Progress – By Kent Beck
In New Zealand they were remotely controlling residential customer hot water tanks and heaters with energy stored in hot oil using a “ripple” signal on the power lines … probably in the eighties by the age of the equipment I saw.
The efficiency is pretty awful, though. It's quite hard to make the economics of it work (even if the electricity is free) with current fuel prices, which is why it's not really happening. Either the tech needs to get a lot better or the fuel needs to get a lot more expensive (which I don't imagine would be a popular option).
It's wrong in HTML, which is what matters.
Wasn't trying to suggest it was AI. I'm aware it's crowd sourced. But in the end, I disagree with the crowd sourcing most of the time, so regardless of if it's a single person, crowd sourced, AI, or anything else... it doesn't cut things where I want it to in a lot of cases.

And I'm pretty sure that the type of person who would spend time submitting the timestamps is probably a person who also is aggressively anti-ads/sponsorships, so is probably aggressive in their timestamps, which is fine, but it makes me gravitate towards agreeing with NewPipe on "not everything is pure evil" more than the sponsorblock submitters.
Woks are carbon steel, not stainless
I never heard that story before, but you are indeed correct. I stand corrected.
How is this different from escaping problems through drug use?
Every time I hear someone use the “slippery slope” argument, what they’re actually doing is making a strawman argument.

I can assure you, script kiddy code on GitHub isn’t going to lead to people uploading kiddy porn on GitHub as well. The two are not in any way related, let alone one being a slippery slope for another.
I would agree it is good for society but considering the risk of getting shut down by your ISP or getting subpoenaed it tends to be poor advice except for the adventurous.
That's because it's either illegal or legally too expensive to give them banking services. You're not describing a tech problem. Banking tech exists. You don't get to decide what random countries want to do with their monetary policy or financial service regulations.
Instead of comparing with modern minivan, you should compare them with minivan from 20 years ago since that's what GP was talking about. In my region, minivans from 20 years ago are smaller than new SUVs today.
That isn't a whole lot more than the cost per kilometer to construct urban roads with a comparable passenger throughput, though. And construction cost alone isn't exactly a fair price comparison because users of urban roads tend to need to supply their own vehicles, at considerable cost to themselves, and more money also has to be spent to provide space to store those vehicles when not in use.

And you could argue that roads are actually even more expensive to invest in because they tend to create a feedback cycle that promotes even more spending on road construction. Because as more people use roads, you need to widen them to increase their carrying capacity, and because road-oriented infrastructure encourages sprawl that pushes people toward choosing driving, and spending more time on the roads, which increases the need for more roads to be built.

A nice case study here is Chicago versus Detroit. Proportionally speaking, they had similar and approximately contemporaneous population growth and loss trends over the 20th century. But that trend didn't cause the same financial catastrophe for Chicago that it did for Detroit, and one argument for why this is is that, since Chicago retained a denser, more public transit oriented urban plan, its infrastructure costs relative to population stayed lower, which in turn meant that it was able to weather a lot more population decline without its economy shrinking too much to be able to affordably maintain its infrastructure, including transportation infrastructure.
"This life is only a prelude to eternity."
- Seneca

You can mostly avoid upsetting people with the God language by talking about love of truth instead.
It's remarkable how totalitarianism seeps in.
https://mantine.dev - they have a TypeScript template ready
Certainly when it comes to computer software causing language to change far outside the sphere of computing terms, TikTok takes the cake, with words like "unalive" joining the real-world lexicon: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/04/08/algospe... is a fascinating read for those unfamiliar with Gen Z jargon.

But the OP article briefly raises an interesting point by way of linking to and quoting https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171308 :

> Analysis of the screen recording data revealed that students were more apt to make microstructural rather than macrostructural changes to their work and that they continuously revised at all stages of their writing.

The idea that we can easily make non-append-only changes to our text simply by moving a mouse or trackpad may very well change how we think about language.

A less severe version, perhaps, of the phenomenon in the movie Arrival and Ted Chiang's novella Story of Your Life (highly worth a read, and easily accessible with a quick search), where learning an alien language changes a person's entire outlook on - well, to minimize spoilers, every aspect of how life is lived.

Perhaps, insofar as I typed the word "perhaps" after I wrote the rest of the forthcoming sentence... we already live in a world where something like this has transpired.
How do you think the LLM -> API tool should work?
Most of the times I’ve had to deal with JSON performance issues, it involved a 3rd party API and JSON was the only option.

If you’re building something net-new and know you’ll have these problems out the gate, something other than JSON might be feasible, but the moment some other system not in the closed loop needs to work with the data, you’re back to JSON and any associated perf issues.
> In theory Elm is just such a fascinating project... if it was not held back by the people developing it.

PureScript may be worth a look, it’s got several features that were rejected by Elm devs: typeclasses, ability to publish modules that use FFI to JS, runs server-side, etc.
I don't care. Before, people would look out for each other and treat everyone with respect, regardless of clothing and style. Tik Tok ravers tend do to the opposite. Let people die on the fucking curb, being an asshat, just go to raves to take all drugs at once. I'm no the only one who thinks that way. This is a very big debate, especially in Germany. So what's wrong with tik tok ravers? They bring their fucking consumerism into a culture that they don't care for, destroying it in the process.

If you want to look into this more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WauGLIefYrg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk6wqKqygDw

watch with subs if needed.
A comment I could have written word for word.

Not hyperbole to say that Gentoo set the course of my life. I don't use it anymore, but I'll never forget my time with it.

Long may it continue.
The biggest theft in history was you being taught the alphabet, numbers, and words without having to pay a creator for them. This mistake will be reversed. All knowledge will be licenced, all words will be owned.

Short summary of The Right to Read, and evidently the world you want.
Usually woks are carbon steel rather than stainless though, and definitely need an oil seasoning.
Honest question:

I frequently hear people bring up transmission losses as a concern, and genuinely curious where this idea comes from? Was this taught in schools or part of some disinformation campaign?
To be clear, is the proposition here that people can refer others to jobs at companies the referrer themselves doesn't work at?
Author here.

> I suggest that everyone try to be excellent and be your best self, go work, create, and live life. If your real talent is software, then do that and do it well. To not do that is robbing society, and yourself, which is a worse crime than the potential of contributing to system that does have issues.

I wholly disagree, but that's because I intend to build other talents instead.

It's just going to be hard to redo my 10k hours to become good at something.

Besides, all the software that I'm interested in has been done already. (Programming language, build system, VCS, init system.)