skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s to force Tesla to respect the agreed upon model of the Swedish labor market.

Instead of having the government decide everything we let the employer organizations and the unions negotiate deals that are adapted to the needs of the sector they are in.

The employers and workers knows much better what is needed to make companies and workers flourish and giving them the freedom to negotiate without having the government meddling with it – that has been very beneficial to Sweden.

In this agreement it has been understood that employers respect the strikes of workers and doesn’t replace striking workers with other workers.

Now Tesla is actively trying to circumvent the strikes and that is pretty much unheard of here and threatens to set a precedent that threatens the entire model of the Swedish labor market.

That’s why there are these strong sympathy strikes now – as Tesla responded to the first strike by attacking the very foundation of our employer-worker relation here in Sweden.

So it’s more than just forcing unionization, it’s about forcing Tesla to respect the Swedish labor market and how we collectively bargain here.
No, there still is a reason to need to replace a perfectly good phone, and it is purely software related. Manufacturers stop supporting their OS for phones, leaving you with something obsolete with lots of security holes. App makers enforce a minimum version of Android.

Even if you can unlock your bootloader and install a new version of Android OS, you will still get screwed over by SafetyNet, good luck installing any banking apps.
No, we just hear more about the anglosphere's problems because... we sadly live in an anglosphere obsessed world :). English being the dominant language means that we all hear about their problems but it's harder to internationally hear about say, France's problems.
If this finding is accurate, this pyramid is 27,000 years old.

20,000 years older than pyramids of Egypt. Older than Göpekli Tepe.
Blinking cursor. Full stop - can't use. But thanks for building it, anyways.
>Interesting analysis. Suprised HN is so negative towards AI (and that the positive:negative ratio to AI is about the same as it was for Crypto a few years ago!)

I would be curious to know many HNers were previously burned by crypto. Fool me once, etc.
Ask HN: I want to explore/fund a videogame idea, where do I start?
I have this idea for a videogame concept, which is basically TABS (totally accurate battle simulator) but for spellcasting. You effectively need to create a "physics" engine for spell effects to that they are satisfying to use & have good interactions between each other and the environment.

I haven't found a game yet which which implements that concept. The closest is probably Noita (https://noitagame.com/). But I would like an isometric view (or third-person view in 3d world) and the spells effects use some kind of particle animation within that world; as opposed as simple pixels in a 2d platformer.

I don't have a background in game development, so I don't know where to start. I'd like to discuss the idea and potentially have some devs build a prototype to build a prototype and see if it's actually fun to play with.
How do I reach for studios and/or indie devs ? Are there good gamedevs forums for that? I am willing to pay for contracts to build some prototypes or fund a whole game if things are promising (let's say ranging from 50k to 1-2M).
To spin the wheels. People still get paid and the economy keeps humming along. No profit doesn't mean people aren't making money, just that the company isn't making excess money.
Devs also overestimate the difference their "clean code" actually makes. Architecture is much more important.
Market share is somewhat meaningless when you consider their market power.
For me the solution ended up being very simple, going for walks.

This wasn’t easy at first because shortly in I’d have back pain just from walking, but over time this subsided and I was able to walk longer.

Now I go for a walk over lunch and use it to think about my work (which is great for brainstorming). Any time I stop my regular walking routine my back pain starts to creep back in so I know the walking has helped a lot.
If you're being asked to estimate a task without insufficient information on what the task is, punt it back with 'More information needed, we'll look at it 3 weeks from now in the next sprint planning'.
In addition to cues of habit, the lingering taste of most toothpaste reduces the tastiness/desirability of any anticipated meal.
I don't think we need to gatekeep who philosophers are. It's okay if she's a bad philosopher. There are already so many already; what's one more?
Hey, the autofix animated gif shows them adding a library I wrote, express-rate-limit!
Sorry, I know you should be using a CSPRNG API for cryptography, and probably my glib phrasing there obscured that.

I'm saying the cost of running actual cryptographic primitives has dropped a ton over time: on computers from decades ago a cheaper flavor of pseudorandomness was clearly necessary, now hardware AES is very cheap. And webpages aren't typically massive doing HPC simulations or other things that will be bound by the PRNG taking a few cycles per byte.

So the memory/CPU benefit of keeping the bad PRNG around is not obviously still worth it to me. In your words, I think I disagree with their priorities, particularly because the cost savings are not what they used to be.
I'm not judging them at all as I agree with your core statement, just saying it's quite remarkable that companies around the world who spend 6 months on MSA revisions in legal over nothing are now OK with a platform that takes 6 months to respond to support requests.
Not self-congratulatory, but bragging about being a real programmer ™ and not part of the ”webdev pleb”.
> Who is supposed to fix this

The team of eng responsible for the code against which a vuln. has been detected, would be my answer.

> This tells me that the responsibility isn't specifically assigned.

Well, no, for the very reason you've highlighted: PMs will be damned to have that time come out of their bucket. That is a problem, and I rather doubt this subthread'll solve the idiocy that is PMs.

Nonetheless, if we accept that vulns. are something the industry should pay attention to, i.e., that "keep stuff using secure versions of dependencies" is actually a best practice the industry should adhere to, someone has to triage the audit report, and then someone yet has to do the deed of correcting it.

Yet both your comment & a sibling have advocated the position of "no, drown the test result, don't block builds". If builds aren't blocked, there is zero impetus towards ever fixing vulns., so they don't get fixed, ever. You cannot, IMO, ignore human nature when setting up these kinds of QC checks in CI: if you make them optional they're as good as dead, cause people are lazy.

You're missing the larger point of my comment, too: there is no sensible setting for that CI step. Say I don't care about what the CI step does, say I don't attempt to take a position in this idiotic debate. I can't: literally any configuration boils down to one of two cases: a.) we're flagging the problem, and devs don't like that and whine and complain or b.) we're ignoring the problem, and security people claim they don't like that, and whine and complain.

I think you're also forgetting how software is actually developed in the wild by many companies: this example, like so many, use a "monorepo". I don't like this (I'd argue for single-purpose repos, and it'd be obvious who the owner of a vuln. is, since the whole repo is only owned by one team.) but nonetheless I'm pretty consistently outvoted on this point, and the majority of firms out there seem to go the monorepo route. So, in a monorepo, "who" is responsible for a vuln. against a third-party dependency? (It can be figured out, but the answer is certainly not as straight-forward anymore!)

(Single-purpose repos aren't without issue here either: often I find in that case that establishing these sorts of "common" CI steps to be hugely problematic: you sort of have to c/p a lot of code between repos, keeping that step's code updated is then a PITA, and many CI systems lack good support for "use this common step, perhaps not even located in this repo".)
What about Orca?

https://100r.co/site/orca.html

Esoteric visual music programming language that uses a 2D grid of operators.
After luring customers with low prices, Amazon stuffs Fire TVs with ads
>But in tracing the history of wrongness, wrestling with all the fashions of thinking, you learn to think with precision

So...Falsifiability?
My only hesitation with Stoicism is there seems to be a path that leads from "do I have control over this?" to "not my problem". And the "not my problem" response is apathy towards things you might be able to exert a minor force towards that manifests into an appreciable outcome. Assuming we're not omniscient, and we don't know how much control we actually have over things. What seems like a terrible issue outside of control may be turned into a less severe issue with some effort. Or am I misunderstanding Stoicism?
I suspect new homes are a only small portion of garage door opener sales.
I still trust the EU way more than my national government.

The EU has apparently enough checks and balances that it gets caught when there is an attempt like this. My national government does have them as well, but they are mostly not being acted upon even when they clearly detect misbehavior.
You’re putting words in peoples mouths here. I’m not LGBT but it’s my understanding that many LGBT folks are open about wanting to block beyond just extreme cases. They wish to participate in a community of shared values, which is hardly a new notion. What is new is that the blurred lines of public vs private spaces has confused everyone’s concept of “free speech”.

An LGBT community is in no way obliged to listen to anti-LGBT voices. In the same way that an unlocked front door is not an invitation for me to enter, the fact that many of these communities are on public platforms doesn’t guarantee your access. Nor is being blocked from that community a strike against free speech: you are able to speak freely in any other location of your choice.
The flip side of that is larry sanger's post-wikipedia success record is very bad and quite frankly a bit nutty.
It’s been a while, but usually you do this because a lot of simd instructions operate more easily on lookup tables like this. You can mask, compare, compute, etc. on multiple lanes at the same time against a lookup table. The u8 value you’d produce into each component of a simd vector would be used as a shuffle mask or a gather offset to use the table.
This. Nothing succeeds like failure.

I've actually heard of VCs who prefer founders who have had high-profile failures because their theory is those founders will have learned a bunch of valuable (expensive) lessons. The null hypothesis for me is those founders may not have learned those lessons and may just not be that great.
My first internship in college, on my last week, my entire organization got laid off. We all went out to lunch at 9am, none of the engineers went back to the office that day. My first job after college, I was there for 6 years, we had I think, 11 layoffs in organizations I worked in, the first one was less than 6 months after I joined. My 3rd job after college, I was there for 5 years, we had at least 3 different layoffs.

In all cases the managers were completely understanding about the mental impact of the layoffs, both for those directly affected and those who kept their jobs and would need to pick up the work of the departing. Never once did I see a manager expect any work to be done the rest of that day after a layoff was announced.

If you ever work for a manager who isn't compassionate during a layoff, I'm sorry, that sucks.
Crypto has objectively increased my net worth by many zeroes, while AI has a lot of hand-wavey "productivity gains" while the self driving cars I was promised are being banned for homicide...
You can find that in London right now.
For what it’s worth I looked him up on LinkedIn. One of his bullets for his time at Microsoft reads:

> Author of "Halloween documents" - analyzing
Linux & Open Source software ;-)

Sounds like he’s “embraced” his infamy after all these years :)
That's the liar's dividend in action: "The benefit received by those spreading fake information as a consequence of the environment in which there is a great deal of fake information and hence it is unclear what is real and what is fake." There is no shortage of freely available media documenting the gruesome carnage inflicted by Israel on Gaza. So someone choosing to use AI-generated images instead may have some kind of ulterior motive.
Background checks don’t ensure trustworthy staff, they just select for only criminals who are slick enough to not get caught doing crime, or criminals who haven’t been caught yet. Their effectiveness is overstated.
I fail to see the conclusion of the experiment though. Why are people susceptible to this? Is it that they crave leadership, boundaries, tradition (made up or not) and comraderie? Is it that they're gullible and will go along with anything?
So is red for american republicans or non-american communists?
I don't see why it's impossible. It requires coordination and millions of dollars in funding by all the respective governments, but if the world thinks CSAM is a serious problem, then it's a drop in the bucket.

CSAM doesn't need to be added to the database in real-time. It can be done quarterly, giving each national agency time to deliberate on the content.
> it doesn't depend on whether the rest of what he wrote is correct

Do you accept ideas out of context?
I feel like the value of crypto going up is backed by solid economics. There is only ever going to be so much of it so losing your money to inflation isn't a risk. People die and don't tell anyone their keys, people forget their keys so we're constantly losing crypto too, w/ currency this is taken into account and print new dollars not w/ crypto. I also think it reflects a general sentiment here in the states and probably China too that we're barreling toward a fucked up never world and crypto is some kind of safe guard against that. In times of uncertainty people turn this gold, this is very much a digital gold.
Would it be a good idea to first move the focus to an adjacent item before disabling the submit button? Like, have something that says "Submitting...", move the focus to that, disable the [Submit] button, and also tag the form element with an attribute that marks it as already sent.
They also have superchargers here – and the sympathy strikes from electricians will include them as well.

And third party service workshops have also been included, so one of the best selling cars in Sweden right now will not be possible to service and neither possible to actually get shipped to Sweden.
Actually mine is G7 Power, it's perfectly supported by Lineage OS: https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/ocean/

Only thing that was a little tricky was that you needed to go to Motorola's website to unlock it, but once I grokked it, it took around 10 minutes.
It's much better adding information to the UI explaining why the button is disabled rather than confusing the user to the point he's done an unnecessary action and got an error
Yes, that's my point. So if you need to predict which conclusion is more likely the actual reality, picking the one made by more experienced individuals on the subject, who have spent more time studying, experimenting and observing the matter, and for which a multitude of those individuals all independently arrive at a similar conclusion, and where they provide extensive rationale through published papers for why and how they arrive at that conclusion (expert consensus), is more sensible, than trying to randomly pick from all the fringe conclusions posted online, or even from picking to the one that went the most "viral" and got reposted most.

Even if, much later, those same experts realize they were wrong, and it turned out one of those fringe conclusions online was actually right.
If you workout your back more often it should take care of you back pain(unless you have some type of injury). If your back is used to pulling weight then keeping you upright in you seat shouldn't be an issue. Do some bent over rows, lat pull downs, cable rows, pull-ups, etc. It shouldn't take more that 30 minutes once a week.
Maybe not the right term. My point is that many philosophers believe that reality (a) is basically as it seems, and/or (b) is basically knowable. It's very odd to say that those views are exclusive to Rand.

edit: one nice example would be Thomas Reid.
Multinational AGI Consortium (Magic): A Proposal for International Coordination
It used to haunt me to the point where I was worried about the longevity of my career.

It took many many years and several steps to address it.

1. My walking posture was bad with flat feet. So I addressed it with physiotherapy to change the way I walk. It was a success, my legs no longer pulled my hip incorrectly.

2. And then I need to change my home office to standing desk. It helped tremendously, no more pinched nerves.

3. And then my wrists, shoulders, and core are simply too weak. I started lifting weights and do core exercises. It helped tremendously as well. It makes me aware of my anterior pelvic tilt.
Time series analysis is epistemologically bunk anyway. You’re telling me that in more than 100 years of study that arima or variants are still the best models? Hogwash. Next you’ll tell me that elevators take us up and down, rather than people simply rearranging the floors when you’re in the elevator…

Related and with less parody, most technical analysis is no better than chicken bone divination.
The one thing that stands out really clearly in the sentiment graph is how, prior to the AI sentiment trough around 2022, AI and Crypto sentiment were highly correlated in their movements.

It would be interesting to see a broader analysis across subjects and see if that shared movement wasn't about AI and crypto, but largely just sort of a fluctuation in general tone across HN, or if instead relative to general HN sentiment, sentiment on Crypto an AI movements were correlated prior to the recent divergence.
Yeah and I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

These machines will become ewaste rapidly.
Resolving a 2500-year-old quandary with neural landscape diffusion
Are you asking if that's legal? Because yes it absolutely is.
I think it is the case for PayPal.
The only way to deal with it is to make "mountains" in more open spaces (squares, large intersections, ...). You can't really take it out.
That is all a matter of public record. Anyone who doesn't want that can file a motion to have it concealed.
It's whatever people want to self-sort themselves into...
I used https://you.com/chat wasn't bad, they have a free month trial coupon "codegpt" for the GPT4 model and GPT3.5 is free ...
That is an active stance of UPS. They wont cross picket lines to deliver.

Apparently their sotesre even has "Strike" listed as a reason for non delivery, option N:

https://twitter.com/RyanElward/status/1448819231567405056
The proposed European Constitution went a long way to fix this, but was unfortunately rejected in French and Dutch referendums.

The people didn't want the EU to reform.
Anecdotally, I've heard the opposite about a lot of the new 5-over-1's going up in the bay area. Several people I know that have moved into recently-built units have complained that they can hear far more neighbor noise than they used to in their old units. This also seems to track with my experience -- I live in an older unit and can only hear my adjacent neighbors when they slam their front door, or when they're having a very loud party on a weekend. Yet when I visit friends that live in newer units, sometimes I can hear the neighbors talking at normal conversation levels through the walls.

I'm completely speculating, but maybe in newer construction, they can now use insulation materials with a very high R rating that are still fairly thin, so while you get the good thermal insulation, sound transmission is increased because there's less material in the way now. Older buildings that made up for the materials not being as high R-rated tended to do so via volume, which also helped with sound deadening. I think in a lot of places, you also need to have firewalls between units so that fire in one unit doesn't easily spread to others, but I expect those materials have also improved over the decades to where they still provide the same fire protection, but no longer have the mass to offer as much sound deadening.
I also realise I must have bought it in 2019, since that's the year it came out.
I have an exercise physiology background (BS & former personal trainer), so I know a bit about this topic. I'm now a SWE and have had my share of back pain. Back pain can be caused by an imbalance of muscle strengths/weaknesses (e.g., strong anterior and weak posterior muscles) or poor stability during movement like walking and squatting.

The commonly-suggested treatment is to perform weight training- squats, deadlifts, lunges, rows, pull-ups, core stability exercises like planks and suitcase carries, anti-rotation core exercises like pallof presses. The idea is to strengthen weak muscles to improve muscle imbalances and stabilize your body when you move.

Exercise alone may or may not work. You need to screen for the root cause. This is a bit more involved, and the best advice I can give is to find a really good physical therapist and/or read "Rebuilding Milo". There's an entire chapter dedicated to back pain- anatomy, how to screen for back pain, classifying the back pain, and treatment. Other chapters are dedicated to hip and ankle. These joints can also be a cause too.

You can step away from your sitting position more often or buy a fancy chair but exercise is the ultimate solution here.
Not at all. They only have to investigate the specific statementss that are coming out of their own mouth. The SEC and DOJ are responsible for investigating statements coming out of all 330 million mouths in the US, in addition to other responsibilities.
Self plug because it’s sort of relevant, I wrote a short snarky blog post today complaining about how the “AI” conference scene is very boring compared to crypto.

https://blog.hazybridge.com/ai-is-boring/
Trying to figure out if this is a humblebrag about how well his life is going. Cause... if the main thing you can think of to complain about is someone has called you 200 times, you're doing pretty well.
Is it good when people specialize in destructive things? There are people who specialize in human trafficing, different types of fraud, etc. Is that an n-way mutual losss?
Agree. The back part of the game is not as well regarded these days by the fanbase.

For my playthrough, I thought certain sections were more annoying than before, but not to a noticeable extent. Besides, an okay set of levels in a FromSoft game is still way ahead of most games.
I mean pretty much that's a cornerstone of our legal system. There's a strong bias against hidden courts where someone may be convicted in secret and punished in secret.
dunkin, sam adams, twinkies. go ahead, i'll wait.
> Because the chat context is derived from the editable state, your corrections are internalised into the chat conversation.

Ah right. That makes more sense to me. Thanks for explaining
> The obvious difference is that AI has abundant use-cases, while Crypto only has tenuous ones.

Hacker News comment sentiment is not a reliable measurem of what the average hacker news developer thinks.

For one, only people who are very invested about something will post about it.

For two, many comments are probably not from developers and instead from fake accounts.

It does not seem surprising to me that both of these factors would be in favor of a more positive sentiment for crypto. People that like it seem to really like it and talk about it a lot, and there is a large financial incentive for numerous actors to create fake accounts and comments.