skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is meaningless fantasy scenario.

A much better model to compare to is a medical one.

Yes, the knowledge about how to perform medical practices should be open and shared for the benefit of the world.

However, laws and practices should be put in place to prevent harm by incompetent or malicious people.

It’s not rocket science.

You don’t need a phd to look at a deep fake and go “well, gee, I guess this could be problematic”. Did you see the recent coverage about teenagers generating porn of their class mates?

Come on.

It’s not about the end of world, it’s about preventing all kinds of harmful stuff (eg. above).

You cant have cake and eat it too.

Either you make everything available to everyone and wear the consequences; or you restrict things so not everyone can have them; or you make it illegal to use them without an appropriate license.

The idea that (a), (ie. just go wild!) is the best outcome it naive, utopian and deeply misguided.

Yes, it’s complicated; but the “Illuminati control the world” stuff is just crazy, stupid conspiracy theory stuff.

Do what you want privately, but you need to be certified to have a business that can legaly run AI models with capabilities > X?

It’s not outrageous.

That all AI runs entirely behind the APIs of a few businesses? That would be literally the same thing, except you could choose to do it yourself if you were willing to meet the legal requirements.

Like banks. Or insurance.

Outrageous I know, but … that’s the world we live in, and it’s not nearly as “nightmare” as some people seem to think.
This looks more like a dartboard than a continuum.
> I wouldn’t consider any of this open source any more.

If this was BSL I agree with you, but that is not the case.

AGPL is about as open source as it gets. It is forced open source.

I recommend AGPL to any of my clients open sourcing anything in a competitive environment these days. Free for the public, but greedy corpos that do not want to share changes and be part of the community are forced to pay to support the developers that are.

This AGPL working as designed, and is certainly FLOSS.
Maybe some of the rhetoric as a form of identify cosplay, but the image art NFT crowd is heavily reliant on the most extreme usage of copyright laws and are often seen advocating for not merely grotesque application of digital rights management but extending the law to prevent their images from being used without payment.
I tend to think since VSCode plugins are javascript all new tooling from Microsoft seems to be written in typescript. As a non front end dev though `npm install` is an instant turnoff for me.
The majority of russia isnt tho
Don't you have to be logged in to get all of those features? For obvious reasons I didn't even consider that to be a option, as the goal is to put as many barriers between Google servers and yourself as possible.
> The fact he takes government money isn't a question

> The problem with people like elon isn't that they get tax payer money, it's that they act afterwords like they bootstrapped themselves alone in to success and then dodge billions in taxes.

Precisely. Elon has stood up and acted like multiple ventures of his either haven't received tax payer funding, or grants, or loans, or subsidies. He and his companies are perfectly entitled to do so. And we are perfectly entitled to call out bullshit when he goes on an interview/Twitter to talk about "without government assistance".
Ah yes apologies, that'll teach me to look at the code before the readme!
So is this where the laser eyes meme meets real life?
Then startups need to be honest about their needs up front, and stop using misleading terms like "unlimited" -- particularly early stage startups.
Comparing a 7B parameter model to a 1.8T parameter model is kind of silly. Of course it's behind on accuracy, but it also takes 1% of the resources.
I don't think the target market for this is people looking for extremely knowledgeable LLMs that can handle deep technical tasks, given that you can't even finetune these models.

I'd guess this is more of an attempt to poach the market of companies like character.ai. The market for models with a distinct character/personality is absolutely massive right now (see: app store rankings) and users are willing to spend insane amounts of money on it (in part because of the "digital girlfriend" appeal).
> I wouldn’t consider any of this open source any more.

If you sell someone a AGPLv3 licensed software, that is completely okay and FOSS.
If that someone sells someone else a (maybe modified) AGPLv3 licensed software, that is completely okay and FOSS.

Not only Matrix can resell Element for a fee, so can you! That is open source and freedom for you.

The ability to change or dual-license has always been limited to special circumstances. That said, yeah, don't sign a CLA.
This will be a game of cat and mouse, much like search and SEO spam, or cyber security.

My belief is that a real solution will require changes at the hardware level, to incorporate hardware level attestation that "cannot be hacked" at the software level.
Wikipedia's structures must be viewed in the same light as Theranos at this point. Moral injuries are so strong in both.
List of all available standings:
https://textstandings.com/
> If you want to be independent for academic/personal reasons,

Or OpenAI's usage policy limits reasons (either because of your direct use, or because of the potential scope of use you want to support for downstream users of your GPT, etc.) Yes, OpenAI's model is the most powerful around. Yes, it would be foolish not to take advantage of it, if you can, in your custom tools that depend on some LLM. Depending on your use, it may not make sense to be fully and exclusively dependent on OpenAI, though.
Co-founder of Fig here! Just want to say that I think this is awesome.

It’s really cool to see alternative implementations of IDE-style autocomplete in the terminal. Nice work!
It's also fake news because no one has access to it yet even though the docs say it's available
I’m thinking of situations where the surrounding structure of the code has been changed to correct a problem.

That’s done by an automated tool. Correction of indentation is just a byproduct.

I don’t consider that “tampering”.
I would argue that the OG of state violence monopoly is Thomas Hobbes and the concept of sovereign as the deposit of the individual’s ability for violence. Will read the link though.
In Portugal there is also philosophy in high school and with time I realize that it was the most practical and important class I ever had and at the time me and my colleagues completely missed its value.
whisper-large-v2 was/is available via API from OpenAI, simply wasn't as much of a focus in their recent communications.
~~wat? the video is 45:35 long.~~
But they assigned numbers to the levels, so it isn't entirely subjective.
A macro? How about a function ;P.
Generally? Do you have examples in mind? The ones I think of are destroy first and ask questions only if told to do so: mv cp rm redirection tee
> But how do you get money to start a company whose goal is "make AI and worry about customers later"?

To a first approximation, you don't.

What is it that you want to achieve? Post-doc like research nirvana[1] with a longer time horizon? Solving a particular problem?

[1] YMMV, but in the best case, that's some version of optimal
"'War is a long cliff.' You can avoid the cliff completely, you can walk along the top for as long as you have the nerve, you can even choose to leap off, and if you only fall a short way before you hit a ledge you can always scramble back up again. Unless you’re just plain invaded, there are always choices, and even then, there’s usually something you’ve missed — a choice you didn’t make — that could have avoided invasion in the first place. You people still have your choices. There’s nothing inevitable about it.”

-Banks - who ought to be quoted more often, here and elsewhere
If you just launched it is too soon to speak.
LineageOS lets you activate it on a schedule, e.g. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. I think maybe stock Android does too?

This is one of the many areas that Samsung phones suck. For many versions, and for older phones that are mostly stuck on those versions, they hide this Android feature entirely. I managed to get it sort-of working by figuring out the intent name and making a shortcut for it in my launcher. (If you have a brand new Samsung, I don't think this is an issue.)
Very interesting. I have literally the exact opposite experience. Of the 15 or so acquaintances of mine that use it, only one or two I would say use it occasionally, nearly all of them use it daily or nightly (often multiple times), occasionally “quitting” cold turkey for short periods.

Some of these people are highly informed about cannabis, some less so, but I don’t think any of them are under the impression that their use is particularly healthy. That said, it would probably be meaningful for them to see the results of this study.
The difference is that open-source forces you to think about code, whereas free software about your freedom.
There are two dozen sexual harassment scandals committed by admins and editors which was uncovered by a journalist starting from a year ago. She has finished written the feature story which might get published on the Daily Beast next year.
because that's not their intention from the start. They act in a grey area and leave breadcrumbs and then don't create a new persona to continue because they want to continue using the reputation/connections they previously have or they slip up.
Disclaimer: I'm from germany, so perhaps this may vary in your country, but I tried to keep it as generic as possible.

I would recommend to first break down your financial situation. Write down the amount of income and the amount of costs. Be as accurate as possible. If you have nothing left, there is not much to do. If you have something left, great.

Then you should ask yourself, if it is required to have some insurances... your job and your health are mission critical for all your investments, maybe it is good to insure them.

After this I would target monthly savings of at least 10% of your current income before taxes - if there is more left, even better.

Personally, I use a 3 pot strategy.

pot 1 is your current account - should be at least 1xincome

pot 2 is your call money account - should be at least 4xincome (more conservative 5x)

pot 3 is your passive ETF / indexing fonds with global diversification

Example:

- You have earnings of $2000 per month.

- Think over having a occupational disability insurance for 1800$ (good ones should be about $40-$70 a month - the earlier you get one, the cheaper they are)

- After you paid for everything (rent, car, living, etc.), let's say you have $500 left

- 10% would be $200, so you have $300 for fun, or save more if you like

- As long as pot 1 is below 2000$, put it there

- If pot 1 is >2000$, start transferring to pot 2

- If pot 2 is >8000$, start pot 3 (indexing)

Most important is, that you should adjust your investments once a year to your current situation. This way you have enough money for small disasters, like the car broke, you move to another appartment or even lose your job.

Passive indexing mostly means, that you should not touch any invested money after it is invested, even if the markets go down rapidly. Your target is to invest for 15 or more years.

If you have saved enough that you are asking yourself if this is still the right strategy, you can vary your investment to gold, real estate or other things, but I personally don't. ETFs are portable, stable and pretty easy to sell.

I instead started investing "socially responsible", but this may be risky and is not mathematically proven... additionally, it is not even fully "socially responsible", so this is not a recommendation :-)

Links that may help:

https://gerd-kommer.de/indexing-101/

https://www.justetf.com/
Can I pay someone to have my ChatGPT transcripts searchable?
It's true, the US sold Taiwan down the river to drive a wedge between USSR and PRC, then spent decades telling ourselves that PRC would become a nice, (post-Christian) liberal democracy if they just became rich enough. That didn't happen.
> Developers can now use our open-source Whisper large-v2 model in the API with much faster and cost-effective results.

https://openai.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt-and-whisper-apis
It's obvious Twitter was overstaffed but xAI has less than 20 employees so definitely not the case there.
> It also makes me wonder if there’s an easier workflow for cleaning up your commit history that’s harder to accidentally mess up.

Use real merge commits and `--first-parent` as your default view.

It's unfortunate that to make `--first-parent` default you have to either edit your git config or grow a few new habits, and I still think there should be at least few more UIs that are focused on `--first-parent` with optional "drill down" instead of raw subway map diagrams. Subway diagrams look cool in screenshots, but so much of the complaints about "clutter" and "mess" in git seem to be just that people don't actually want to read the subway diagrams.
I most definitely am not paid by OpenAI and am very confused how my original (critical) comment could be seen as astroturfing.
I worry about that risk as well. I assume that even if Linux were to introduce a mechanism for system call authentication, it would be something lone would be able to use to mark its system call primitive as allowed.
Does this mean OpenAI tts is available via api? I saw whisper but not tts - maybe I’m missing it?
Modern GPS receivers are much faster. They can search for every possible satellite at every offset rapidly in parallel, meaning that they don't need the almanac in order to get a GPS lock quickly. They do still need the orbital data for each satellite being used, but that's transmitted by the satellite itself much more regularly than the almanac and mobile phones can generally speed things up even further by downloading a small amount of assistance data that contains orbits for all the satellites for the next day or so.
The context of this exact discussion is the defense of the ugly Rust code above by Rust aficionados who see nothing wrong with it. That code came from the Embedded Rust working group in their learning material for Rust beginners.

I'm not taking anything out of context. That code is hideous. It's terse. It uses controls and defenses that aren't needed for most embedded applications. It turned a beginner away from the language. When I provided much simpler C code as an alternative, Rust aficionados started to cry about unneeded mutexes, unneeded ref counting, the inability of programmers to remember to call free or mutex_unlock, etc. etc.
I'm not sure if the fix is reassuring or not: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/9411/files
When you say there are different forms, I think you mean different forms of solipsism. If that is what you meant, then I think this discussion is circling back to my original post, in this sense: you are demonstrating that one can have a rational discussion about it. What I am not so convinced about, however, is whether one could rationally be a solipsist - to really (that word again!) believe that (to pick one particular definition for concreteness) the self is the only reality.

In this regard, the inability to disprove solipsism is not sufficient to be a justification for believing it; if it were, the mirror argument would equally justify not-solipsism, and so a rational person should regard both arguments as inconclusive.

I only mentioned brains-in-vats and simulations because I wondered whether mypalmike had them in mind, and only to say that I don't think it matters whether or not the putative solipsist is either of these things.

Rather than continue in this vein, I will point you to an article which concludes with the section "The Incoherence of Solipsism":

One might even say, solipsism is necessarily foundationless, for to make an appeal to logical rules or empirical evidence the solipsist would implicitly have to affirm the very thing that he purportedly refuses to believe: the reality of intersubjectively valid criteria and a public, extra-mental world. There is a temptation to say that solipsism is a false philosophical theory, but this is not quite strong or accurate enough. As a theory, it is incoherent. What makes it incoherent, above all else, is that the solipsist requires a language (that is, a sign-system) to think or to affirm his solipsistic thoughts at all.

https://iep.utm.edu/solipsis/
They back it up by doxxing alleged repeat offenders on "Long term Abuse" pages.
Being able to have multiple personae could be very useful.

One persona may not give you the answer you're looking for, but another one may. I think maybe they should require the GPTs to have human names though so people intuitively understand that.

Like, Paul can't help me with this task, so let me ask Monica instead.

They could even interact.
Wasn’t `git reflog` viable?
Sorry this is a dup, I see this was already posted and on the front page https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38166098
Correlation isn't causation.

I know, the headline only says "linked", but most people skip over that nuance.

The type of person that would use marijuana daily may not be the type of person to exercise much as they should, or eat as well as they should, or maybe they have incredibly bad anxiety..
So with 128K context window, if you actually input 100K it would cost you:

Input: $0.01 per 1K tokens * 100 = $1.00

$1.00 per query?

Given that each query uses the entire context window, the session would start at $1 for the first query and go up from there? Or do I have it wrong?
Yes. This is exactly what happened.

The KIM-1 (Keyboard Input Monitor) was created by Chuck Peddle at MOS Technology, which later was bought by Commodore, so the MOS Technology KIM-1 became the Commodore KIM-1. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIM-1)

Peddle then expanded the KIM-1 into the Commodore PET 2001 with case, monitor, keyboard and tape drive all built in. The 2 KB TIM (Terminal Input Monitor) ROM in the KIM-1 was expanded into the 4 KB KERNAL ROM in the PET. (Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_PET)

Of course, then the PET was upgraded with additional models including the 3032, 4032, 8032, 8096, 8296 and the SuperPET, then the CBM-II series and the Commodore VIC-20, Commodore 64, Commodore 16, Plus/4, Commodore 128 and the unreleased Commodore 65.
This is kind of the wrong place for this, but given the burst of attention from LLM-loving people: is there any open source chat scaffolding that actually provides a good UI for organizing chat streams and doing stuff with them?

A trivial example is how the LHS of the ChatGPT UI only allows you a handful of characters to name your chat, and you can't even drag the pane to the right to make it bigger; so I have all these chats with cryptic names from the last eleven months that I can't figure out wtf they are; and folders are subject to the same problem.

Seriously, just being able to organize all my chats would be a massive help; but there are so many cool things you could do beyond this! But I've found nothing other than literal clones of the ChatGPT UI. Is there really nothing? Nobody has made anything better?
This exactly. I'd rather pinpoint the issue to a small commit with only a few changes vs. "well I know which feature caused the issue, now to wade through 65 changed files."
"Black Rednecks and White Liberals" by Thomas Sowell is pretty interesting.

tl;dr: Sowell contends that the "black ghetto culture", characterized by violence, a lack of ambition, a dismissive attitude toward education, and a casual approach to work, is not inherent to African-Americans. Instead, he argues that it is a cultural relic of white southern 'Redneck' or 'Cracker' culture, which was brought to the South by immigrants from the more lawless regions of Britain.

These immigrants, according to Sowell, came from areas that were marked by a resistance to work, a lack of education, a predilection for violence, and a general disregard for the law. These cultural traits, Sowell argues, were absorbed by the African-American population in the South during the era of slavery and have been perpetuated in certain communities to this day.
Botipedia is already a thing although in beta.
This seems like the best free voice recognition in general.

Is there a model that is the best at wake word detection? The last that I looked, it seemed like this was fairly lacking.
The endpoint was just confusingly named:

> The Whisper v2-large model is currently available through our API with the whisper-1 model name.

https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/whisper
That's not been my experience, unless by "get permission" you mean "provide notification". I simply tell my manager when I'm going to be gone; the longer I'm going to be gone, the further in advance I let him know. That's it. I don't have to nickel-and-dime myself with PTO hours or keep track of them at all. I strongly prefer unlimited PTO to the traditional model.
I think this is wrong. Because we can run the Turing machines for max(n1, n2) steps. If a machine halts after that many steps, then it rules out the lesser value. If none of them halts after that many steps it rules out the greater value.

So our only uncertainty is between one specific number, and some unspecific bigger number that forever recedes into the distance as we try to approach it.

You propose that the issue is some pesky non-standard numbers that are bigger than any other number. But I'm thinking the issue is rather the for-all symbol.

Like from the outside of the theory we can see that we can prove a certain property for 1, for 2, for 3 etc, in fact we can prove this property for any number. But inside the theory we cannot prove that for-all n the property holds. So there is a divergence between what we want for-all to mean and what it actually ends up meaning?

Or using the there-exists perspective, if there exists an actual object inside a theory that satisfies a property P, then there-exists x such that P(x) will be true. But it can also be true without such an actual object existing.
Checking hn and product hunt a few times a week gives you most of that awareness and I don’t need to remind you about the person behind hn ‘sama’ handle.
But by that logic Intel should be lobbying the government to outlaw every CPU architecture, or every competing product, or... every product they might conceivably want to compete with. The same logic works for every product! Or every company! It's all specious.

In point of fact, and I'll just say it again: this is dumb. Intel isn't remotely the most likely candidate here (again, my read is that on balance they'd love to see ARM competitors get some pressure on the other side). Trying to claim otherwise is just engaging in platform flamery nonsense. The logic doesn't work.
Ctrl+f “exercise” - 0 results

Ctrl+f “diet” - 0 results

The conclusion might be true, but the methodology is junk.
Speaking from a point of view with N a lot bigger than 15, I'm going to endorse this answer: daily use is common.
It certainly will be a fun experience. But our current belief is that LLMs are a commodity and the real value is in (application-specific) products built on top of them.
I think there was a tool called justunfollow. I never used it myself so I'm not sure how well it worked.
See this for a proper evisceration of rebase and what a proper tool would do:

https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/rebaseharm.md
I feel like I've trashed millions of files I shouldn't have with `rm` and trying to be clever with regular expressions.
Magnetic Gel Can Help Wounds Heal Faster
It was the period between Cold War hysteria and War on Terror hysteria. Of course it was much better in crucial aspects.
Vector DBs should never have existed in the first place. I feel sorry for the agent startups though.
OpenAI is a sane company. They do rollouts for new features.
Oh! When I replied it was a lot longer — it still had the countdown from before the stream went live. I guess they replaced it with the trimmed version.