skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sounds a bit fancy for an Aussie farmboy, former shearer .. I looked it up and he more or less moves at that pace anyway - maybe due to being in the navy and having had to march (for a short stint, then five years in engine rooms) - but most likely because we've always walked a lot to get places and why waste the time going slow.

He's still pretty active, he maintains sections of the Bibbulmun Track (1,000 km walking track here in the lower corner of the state) shovels the odd few tonnes of manure, splits wood by hand, etc.
Tutanota is not Tuta (it still says tutanota everywhere)
Even though in certain Buddhist countries animals get slaughtered for food, taking lives of animals is a big thing in Buddhism.

There is fundamentally no difference between animal consciousness and human in the buddhist view.

But to take it to a human level: you dont see a difference in (chemical) castration of people with mental disability and killing them?
It's not "they don't want people'.

It's that ISM has power limits, and most radio freqs also has "minimum power to accomplish communication".

And the FCC knows in contentious RF environments, loudness wars would inevitably happen, as we saw in CB during the 1970s. And in 5.8GHz, wifi is a secondary priority to radar scanning applications. Again, human operators know this.

The FCC is being a good steward in preventing the downward slope of the tragedy of the commons. And, well, that's their mission.

We can't trust non-licensed human operators to not take the volume to 11, and TX when they shouldn't. Id rather have hardware blobs that enforce FCC law than locked down devices.
If you bought a billion dollars of bitcoin 365 days ago, you have $680M profit today.
What did archive do?
Subscribers mainly.
They get to argue their insane "withholding taxes are an illegal barrier to trade" idea all the way to CJEU, lose, continue to refuse to comply, and then have the gall to pretend they're "surprised". Good grief.
I never liked Rocket Propelled Grenades, so no favorites, and in these dark times of multiple violent conflicts, they are holding up the path to peace. Never knew Nitendo was also a weapons manufacturer, I know them mostly for computer game devices.
Invest in yourself, especially in your education when you are young and able to devote yourself fully to education. All the money you invest in education will pay off by opening up new possibilities and paths in life, better employment and earning opportunities.
In bosnian `tuta` is potty pot for toddlers.
Check out these resources:

Books:
- Site Reliability Engineering
- Infrastructure as Code
- The DevOps Handbook

Online Courses:
- Google Cloud Platform Fundamentals on Coursera
- AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner on Udemy
- Azure Fundamentals on Microsoft Learn

Blogs:
- The DevOps Blog
- Site Reliability Engineering Blog
- AWS Compute Blog

Certifications:
- Google Cloud Certified Professional Cloud Architect
- AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate
- Microsoft Azure Solutions Architect Expert

You can also check out the website iswebsite.live: https://iswebsite.live/, which provides a free and easy way to check if a website is up or down.

Hope this helps!
They have jurisdiction everywhere within the US, but enhanced powers near the borders. Some details in [0].

Specifically, they have the right to search and seize "with no suspicion of unlawful activity" within 100 miles of any border - including sea borders, so that's about 70% of the US by population. Also anywhere around international airports and inland waters "with ready access to the open sea", but the 100-mile zone doesn't appear to apply there.

Certain other powers are limited to 10 or 25 miles from the border.

[0] https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10559
Good read, although the motivation to leave US rings false. I know there's lots of talk online of US collapsing, but I didn't think serious people believe it. I suspect OP had other concerns as well.
Online Radio – Add radio to your favorites
Just announcing that we have implemented one of the most requested features by our users - you can now sign in with your google account and add radio stations to your favorites!
The best solution is to make sure attempts to 'cancel' people don't work. Ignore the pressure to fire or get rid of employees who offend people, ignore online protests and avoid supporting companies that prioritise said views.

By doing so, they'll basically fade into irrelevance. Once people realise the effects on their businesses and lives are virtually non existent, they'll give up on trying to cancel people due to its futility.

See how almost every corporate 'boycott' just falls apart over time.
I've found it tricky to find updated hw with openwrt support - and tricky to find devices that is easy to buy the correct hw version of.

If you don't want wifi6 or 5ghz support, it's easier.
I’m not sure if much more research has been done here from this team. I was able to produce similar results in my dissertation, also not in a production setting.

Regarding your second point, the way congestion avoidance algorithms typically work is to punish the local client for the state of the global congestion. If Remy can do that in a more efficient way (ie greater throughput or fairness for the local client) then it would be beneficial to use the algorithm before others switch.
> Compared to all the other SSA optimizations the compiler does already, this optimization seems cheap

It probably is cheap, but if you keep piling cheap optimizations on top of each other, you can easily end up with a slow compiler.

> Also, it improves a very common operation. Strings are compared all the time.

Yes, strings are compared all the time, but that doesn’t imply it improves a common operation. It only improves the three-way comparison case. I think (but don’t have data) that’s a lot rarer.

That strings are compared all the time also means the cheap optimization has to run ‘all the time’, most of the time only to decide that it can’t do any good.

Because of that, if you have a time budget for the compiler (and I think the go people have one, at least informally), that may be better spent on other optimizations.

Also, the three-way comparison has a perfectly fine workaround: call the intrinsic. That PR makes that a bit nicer by wrapping the intrinsic, and it removes the gotcha from the standard library. I think I would leave it at that.

Of course, the optimization still may be beneficial, but to decide that, we would need data on how often that optimization would be beneficial in real-world code.
Stubbing I/O in Yesod
Yes, in the early days of ChatGPT I had noticed that polite conversation leads to less adversarial responses. In retrospect it does seem logical that a language model would choose more amenable responses and be more willing to help when spoken nicely to. I do not know if that behavior has been programmed out of it by now, I simply talk nicely to it with please and thank you out of habit at this point.
People forget that the only difference between genius and fraud is success. Succeed, and you will go down not as a liar but making "premature promises"[0]. I believe that generally people like Holmes and SBF actually think they will pull these things off. Just spend an hour or two listening to entrepreneur podcasts and you will identify the source of this kind of culture. We reward truth-bending constantly and listen to founder's stories with awe, but as soon as any of these things fail we are quick to judge the failure.

I think it actually has a lot more to do with the social disgust reaction to a big failure, than any well reasoned distinction between fraud and hustle.

[0] https://www.entrepreneur.com/science-technology/how-steve-jo...
But, but, the preassumption is that Parkinson is not curable and so we'll replace part of your body mechanism with implants!

It IS good to know we have implants to help them. But, what would really thrill me is that we end up finding something that can cure them!
This title is plain misleading. In the original Mozilla post:

- Although we'll be hosting the repository on GitHub, our contribution workflow
will remain unchanged and we will not be accepting Pull Requests at this time
One thing I've realised is that time spent walking is never wasted.

During a walk you can think more clearly, or you can listen to a (mind-expanding) podcast, or you can walk with friends or your partner which counts towards building & strengthening relationships. That's without even considering the health benefits.

If you drive somewhere you could walk, that time really is wasted - because you should be focusing on not killing anyone instead of on anything interesting.

Same walk over and over? Could be a nice walk! I repeat the same walks, because I live near a park and a beach. I could roam the streets randomly instead, but that wouldn't be better.

Running is better for cardio, sure, but I tended to find that changing clothes, warming up, running 5K, recovering and taking a shower takes close to an hour - and I could have walked that 5K in the same time and not been exhausted for the rest of the morning. Longer distances are more worth it but regular 10-20K runs turned out to be bad for my knees.
It’s going to be just us and the pod in the not so distant feature, no need for other forms of being in the world to be around us.

And then people will keep posting about their depression medication and about increasing suicide rates.
I'm in Europe and I only buy stuff that is sold by or delivered by Amazon. Never had a problem with any scam in years and hundreds of products. The prices are good. Delivery to pickup locations is very convenient. 30 day return policy for any reason and it's very easy and free to actually send it back.

I see a lot of hate for Amazon on HN, maybe it depends on the location. I never had a problem with them and neither did any of my friends.
I agree the jury is out on this.
Shelf life can also be improved by freezing rather than other techniques (as is the case with Cook).
It's true. Since starting in health tech, the areas of which are sometimes technically interesting, but not in a cutting edge sort of way, I feel a lot more motivated. Three women I know personally have used (and totally loved) the app we made for gestational diabetes, and half the NHS uses it to manage this type of patient, so the total number of people helped just keeps going up.

I think of it as something to put on my "life CV"; it might not be an astounding technical achievement, but I'll remember it and be glad I did it for my whole life.
I wonder if it's possible that the laws of physics were simply different in the early universe. Perhaps the universe didn't spring into being with the laws being exactly the same as they are now, leading to things happening differently than they do now, causing our models to fail because we're trying to extrapolate backwards with the assumption that the laws of physics are static.
As I just said in another thread, “amateurs talk about effort, professional talk about impact”. Unravelling the puzzle of how impact happens is the hardest problem.
Sure, commit often while you're working.

But then when you're done, turn it into a series of patches for a reviewer to read. In the words of Greg Kroah-Hartman, "pretend I'm your math teacher and show your working".

In a maths assignment, you spend ages making a big mess on a scrap of paper. Then when you've got the solution, you list the steps nice and clearly for the teacher as if you got it right first time. In software development, if you're not a dick, you do the same. You make a big old mess with loads of commits, then when you're done and it's review time, you turn it into a series of tidy commits that are easy for someone to review one-by-one.
Bonus points for asking for information in a flat unemotional Brent Spiner voice.
Mid 40s
Thank you. I hadn't looked at the banana pi - looks interesting.
Also throwing away moral upper hand the right keeps could work.

Attack everyone asking for cancelling someone. When the people doing cancelling are cancelled themselves they are too busy to do it again.
When it came to crypto, in the good times of 2022 a lot of people just wanted to own it and exchange it now and then. Just at that basic level I'm sure a lot of businesses could be profitable without risking other people's money.

But once you get into the game of making the line go up faster, you start taking risks with money you don't own, then all this devolves into BS.
Anyone building from source has the ability to potentially including some modifications. Unless you are able to verify that checksum published (by whoever builds the code) "matches" the source code (by reproducing the build) you cannot be sure there aren't any modifications. Published checksums are often meant only for verifying that binary you got matches the original binary. Not for verifying that it is build from specific source code.

Many Debian packages already have reproducible builds, but not everything.

From Debian wiki:

> Reproducible builds of Debian as a whole is still not a reality, though individual reproducible builds of packages are possible and being done. So while we are making very good progress, it is a stretch to say that Debian is reproducible.

https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds

But the point is that this has nothing to do with the type of an open source license. GPL doesn't guarantee you that a build is reproducible and MIT doesn't prevent you from having reproducible builds.
I wonder what they're being used for. The UI doesn't expose it, but the Bluesky API will tell you who redeemed your invites. Open the site, watch for a "com.atproto.server.getAccountInviteCodes" request in your browser's network inspector, look in the "usedBy" field in the response JSON, and append the DID value there onto "https://bsky.app/profile/". Any commenters in the parent chain who got scraped want to take a look?
I assume that messages between users are stored in those SQLite DBs.

Think email. When you send an email and CC five other people as well then seven people now have the same copy of the email stored on their email servers. That is, there’s no central database that contains a single email that is referenced by others.

This is basically how sharding with relational DBs works as well.

This sort of data denormalization is almost a requirement as applications scale and especially for many-to-many applications that have a high write to read ratio.

Low write to read and you can get away with a single master to many slave relational DB architecture for quite astonishing numbers of requests and data!
You actually want the sterilized strays to remain so that they put pressure on the resources that would otherwise feed the unsterilized strays. That suppresses the stray population even further.

Also, wtf?
what about machines for entertainment?
I like this example of a cold email:

https://marketingexamples.com/sales/jason-cohen

I think being humble and open is the way to go.
There's nothing wrong for you and your wife to invite a stranger couple over for dinner.
Could you please elaborate on why you think you passed out or what led up to that incident? Whenever I'm particularly stressed, I tend to become very light-headed or dizzy to the point where it feels like I'm about to pass out, but I never do. I've had this on and off for years. I'm only 26 years old.
At our local makerspace the laser cutter has a microswitch attached in parallel with the laster tube, so it won't output anything if the lid isn't fully closed
Oof, yeah the new UI Toolkit is another example of something that's dragging along. Even in their official docs they still recommend that you use the older system.
I heard that, but it's like the end of days, it's always said to come soon, but doesn't no matter how much you wait. Conveniently, the prophecy doesn't have an exact date.
"Stalin (1924-1953) was a criminal, terrorist and superspreader of misinformation who promoted economic illiteracy and conspiracy theories about the USA."
Yes. I didn’t run 5ks and I didn’t try to run fast. I heard the buzz phrasey “to go faster you have to go slower” for like 2 years and totally disregarded it.

I used to run before this latest bug, like a year ago, but I hated it. My only goal was to do a sub 30 minute 5k and I trained for like 8 months with 0 progress and was so dejected I quit. I would show up, run at a 10 min pace for as long as I can, repeat. It felt like shit and I didn’t get better. My growth happened when I just ran 4.5 mph until it was the _bad kind_ of uncomfortable (this is too much stress on my shins vs my legs muscles are building lactic acid). After two weeks, I upped the pace a tiny tiny bit. I spend most of my runs fighting with myself to slow down.

The science behind it is something something aerobic base and running economy. I’m absolutely not an expert, but anecdotally I’ve never had my life improve so much in such a short amount of time by just _running slower_
tuta not a tutanota?
You're right, it's absolutely ridiculous. While there are things worthy of criticism (e.g., the protocol based on HTTP polling isn't exactly realtime, decryption errors are mostly just a UI bug in Element, Element in general having many UI bugs, etc) these aren't even close to worth the outright hate Matrix gets here.

HN is usually a hypefest for any new technology, but as soon as the topic turns to Matrix the threads immediately become a Mad Max-style wasteland. It makes no sense whatsoever. Especially this thread – a move to AGPL with a dual-licensed option for corporate customers is absolutely fine, Stallman and the FSF support it, and it's the most sustainable way to run a truly free software project.

The only reason I can think of why HN would be so hateful towards a license change is that many people here actually used Matrix to build proprietary products and don't want to contribute to upstream (be it with code or money).
People lose their own money or give to some ace gambler to use it to make bets and lose it for them.

When you say I'll keep your money safe and not invest it somewhere and then turn around and gamble with it, then you get into the breaking of rules.
Hence disk encryption?
"But what about m'uh innovative and disruptive SV unicorns!? EU bad."
The problem I have with the AGPL is some companies interpretation of the AGPL. And the FSF or the license itself doesn't help to clarify these issues. For example MinIO had this text on their compliance page:

> To "modify" MinIO means to copy from or adapt all or any part of the work in a fashion requiring copyright permission, other than the making of an exact copy. The resulting derivative work is sometimes referred to as a "modified version" or we say that it is "based on" the earlier work. > Passing configuration parameters to a MinIO binary instance constitutes making a modified version, as it does not produce an exact binary copy.

> Combining MinIO software as part of a larger software stack triggers your GNU AGPL v3 obligations. > The method of combining does not matter. When MinIO is linked to a larger software stack in any form, including statically, dynamically, pipes, or containerized and invoked remotely, the AGPL v3 applies to your use. What triggers the AGPL v3 obligations is the exchanging data between the larger stack and MinIO.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230320134618/https://min.io/co...

They changed this language now, perhaps understanding now how insane that made them look (or a lawsuit forced them to, no idea): https://min.io/compliance

But still, I like the AGPL too in theory, but I understand why many companies don't touch anything AGPL, its a very fuzzy, complicated license that leads to a legitimate uncertainty. For the license to be useful it actually needs to be used by companies in order for them to contribute anything back to begin with, but many are avoiding it like the plague.

/edit MinIO also still has this text on their page:

"Designed for developers who are building open source applications in compliance with the GNU AGPL v3 license and are able to support themselves. It is fully featured. If you distribute, host or create derivative works of the MinIO software over the network, the GNU AGPL v3 license requires that you also distribute the complete, corresponding source code of the combined work under the same GNU AGPL v3 license. This requirement applies whether or not you modified MinIO."

So AGPL (at least in some peoples twisted minds) goes far beyond protecting something from AWS&Co.
I didn't say it was invalid. I gave an example of how it could do better. I'm allowed to say I don't like their comment, to dislike it and state that. I even did better and gave them constructive criticism, walking the walk, which you are not doing for me.
This whole thing makes me question our economic system.

Yes, we want to reward people who create value. If someone invents a fusion power plant or a cure for cancer, they should get a fat payoff.

But this thing, the guy has gotten paid a lot of money for creating no value.

Of course, investment is a game about uncertainties. People paid him out based on projections that turned out not to happen. You buy a thing, it turns out not to work, you are out money. That seems fair enough too.

But somehow it still seems wrong that a guy can sell a thing that turns out to not do anything useful, and get a similar payoff to someone who eg becomes all-time top musician.

The only thing I can think of that might seem relevant here is that there were relatively few people involved in judging whether WeWork was gonna work. The amounts of wealth concentration make this possible.

Contrast that with Taylor Swift, who still needs to spend her time touring to make her money. She's dependent on the decisions of a large number of consumers.
Chebfun: Numerical Computing with Functions
And "to sound the horn" in swedish :)
I don’t really want other people knowing where my car is most of the time. That’s a convenience I can live without.
The takeaway is you say what you do and then do what you say.
In Norway, this trend over time is for EVs to be driven more and more and ICE to be driven less:

https://www.rystadenergy.com/news/norway-fuel-demand-electri...

> In 2022, the average BEV drove 12,950 kilometers (km), surpassing for the first time the average distance of 12,000 km for diesel passenger vehicles. Overall, average passenger vehicle travel has steadily declined in Norway, from about 13,800 km in 2007 to 11,100 km in 2022.

> Average BEV distance gradually increased from around 11,800 km in 2015 to 12,950 km. EV penetration in Norway is slightly skewed towards customers and counties with above-average annual driving requirements, and charging infrastructure and vehicle range are no longer limiting factors.

Which makes sense, the ideal case for EV is someone who drives a lot every day, since you save compared with ICE for every mile driven.

One early Tesla success story was a rural postal delivery man who managed to pay for the then very expensive Model S with the mileage payments he received that assumed he was burning fuel.

edit better graph:

https://robbieandrew.github.io/EV/img/avg_dist_driven.png

Note that this graph could be used to support the exact same conclusion as the current article, between 2016 and 2022 EVs drove less miles than ICE. There's a very clear trend though.

And the data for the current story is from second hand sales. Which adds probably upwards of 3 years lag to the data.
No because farmers are rural, and live in their business.

If you live in a rural area you need to drive more because less places are in walking distance, not that that means you can't use an ev, but you know 'people'.
damn, seems already all gone
this whole article reeks of privilege
Switzerland vs Germany, laws and governmental coercion history. There is also the individuals running them and their background and scale of operation, proton is much more used so it is a bigger target but it also makes more money so more resources for tech and legal stuff.
we don't need argue with how it work in current environment. there are a lot of people take cat to their new home in history.
Esperanto Language