skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Inside Task Manager with the Original Author
Well the context of the article is at the time recent, buggy implmentations of ssl and other security protocols which were at the time unproven security protocols, and government entities providing black-box crypto with either explicit or occult back doors. If by high-trust you mean I'm going to trust a government entity's protocol or implmentation of a security protocol which doesn't provide decent forward secrecy or non-repudiation, well then, even in a high-trust environment that sounds like a bad idea.
Because the vast majority of content is owned by a tiny number of copyright owners (studios, IIRC, but it doesn't really matter who, just how many), who then impose artificial constraints. Netflix didn't decide to implement DRM on its own, it passed through requirements that would be imposed on anyone else too.
Not really. I've had people driving perfectly normal sedans with 1,000-yard stare off to their left as they're turning right on red, who don't see me at all as a pedestrian trying to walk across the crosswalk from their right. I first noticed this a few decades ago (before even iPhones).

The average American doesn't understand the concept of "have your head on a swivel" and maintaining situational awareness of what is going on in two different directions. Or of just always be looking the direction that you're going (if you're about to stomp on the accelerator you better first be looking forward).

The massive SUVs and trucks just make the problem worse, but they didn't start the problem.

And that is apart from the horrible level of driver education, and education in general in the US, where a lot of drivers don't seem to understand that you actually need to stop for a right on red, or even that you need to yield to traffic from the left and just blow straight through the light.
And the regulator pretty much said it is all fine, nothing to see here!
It doesn't have to mean that. There is always nuance in the middle.

I'd simply say this: If you are still coming into direct contact with containerization tech, I don't think you are extracting the maximum amount of value that is currently available on these platforms.

Today, I don't know how many machines are actually supporting our production environment. I don't care anymore. That is the central value proposition.
You meant to say 'delightful smorgasbord' of a language.

Don't worry; I'll forgive your insolence this time.
Because it isn't a silver bullet but rather a countermeasure against rootkits, bootkits and certain physical tampering by regular and insider threat actors.
> Quite a few YouTubers and streamers got early access to the game, but they were explicitly forbidden to talk about performance until the regular review embargo was lifted.

This, along with games like Alan Wake 2 getting phenomenal reviews in the face of terrible performance and game breaking bugs, makes me wonder why folks trust the current corrupt review system, of which streamers are now part of too.
If I take a copyrighted song and remix it do I owe the artist a royalty? Yes.

Stop making excuses. AI training on copyrighted works is straight wrong no matter how much you don't want it to be.

All of my internet comments are copyrighted btw, but I do offer a license of $1b usd/year for using them in a model if you'd like.
It doesn't come down to 'simply learning'. There's an inherent bias towards extreme risk aversion, conservatism and NIH syndrome in the expert groups that the UK government consulted. I'd love to think that such a smart group of talented individuals could self-correct, but I don't think many have yet seen their error. Three years is already too long to wait.
There truly is an xkcd for everything: https://xkcd.com/294
Compression is not what anyone means when they talk about deduplicating file systems. Or what the 1st comment described.
So is butter

https://doi.org/10.1080/0002889738506828
And if you put in the correct rice to water ratio, it will be perfect.

inner_pot_weight = input("How much does your inner pot weigh: ")
RiceWeight = input("How much does your rice weigh in grams: ")

water_amount = (int(RiceWeight) \* .19) + int(RiceWeight)
total_pot_weight = int(inner_pot_weight) + int(RiceWeight) + int(water_amount)

print(f'You will need to add {water_amount:.0f} grams of water, and your total pot weight will be {total_pot_weight} grams.')
print("Set your pressure cooker to white rice, and do a natural release after 10 minutes.")
This essay is a mess. I won't flag it, but I doubt with such poor definitions it'll make much of a useful conversation on HN.

I counted four topics in the first few paragraphs that the author defined in a poor, self-serving way. Any one of these topics and associated definitions would be interesting to talk about. Put them all together and it's just too much to clean up (for folks taking any kind of issue at all with the thesis or conclusion.)

It was well-structured and cogent, though. Kudos to the author for that. That puts them well above other essays of this type.
Well then let Microsoft send their employees with a camera each to the library.
The ones living outside the city limits: is it practical for and done by most of them to use public transit and thereby save money by not owning a car?
not looking into benchmarks, just from personal feelings for me Firefox feels faster, not sure exactly why I think maybe that's more consistent fps?
definitely video acceleration on linux is much better and screen sharing works much better with less memory and CPU

this is funny because those are mostly the same reasons i switched from Firefox to chrome X years ago
God this “X is a feature not a bug” has become so cringe
Sure, even compact cars 20 years ago were smaller than compact cars today. You cannot practically suggest people drive 20-30 y.o. vehicles, for one there are not enough of those.
You will be hard pressed to find a more pretentious music scene than (European) techno. And I am saying this as someone who enjoys the music.
I assume that e-mail scrapers already have a regex that catches all syntactical variations of [at] and [dot].
It does when you produce the code verbatim, as happens frequently.
There was a Canadian scientist in the 70’s and 80’s who thought he’d figured out how to electroplate limestone out of seawater. I just a couple months ago found a little documentary from the 00’s that said someone was still giving him money to try to built artificial atolls somewhere out off of Madagascar.

At https://www.epa.gov/npdes/copper-free-brake-initiative some point between the two I came across someone who thought that what was really happening is that the electricity attracted coral polyps. So I’m wondering if charging the hull would cause very different problems?

But strictly speaking don’t sacrificial anodes already charge the hull? Doesn’t seem to slow them down much.
Doesn't this eat any log output when running things on Windows? https://github.com/KnorrFG/dotree/blob/0.5.1/src/core.rs#L17...
Whisper_to_ChatGPT
I've been using this for a few weeks and been loving it. Since Whisper is so good I use the chrome plugin to transcribe stuff and then copy paste it to the actual application I'm using.
This is not my primary understanding of where the term "Web 3" came from or refers to (though I'm not really disagreeing with you - the term is sufficiently nebulous that people use it to mean different things in different contexts).

I always understood the primary differences in the Web "versions" to be:

1. Web 1.0: dedicated servers on the Internet producing a lot of content/services by your average user who accesses that content with a web browser.

2. Web 2.0: really focused on the rise of user-generated content, e.g. social media, blogging platforms, image sharing sites, etc. But the architecture is still primarily client-server with end users interacting with server-provided apps.

3. Web 3.0: The main differentiator in Web 3.0 is trustless peer-to-peer architecture. That is, it's no longer about end users needing to connect to Google or Facebook-owned servers to receive and share content. Instead, the content lives on a distributed blockchain that no single entity owns. All of the applications that people talk about in "Web 3.0" like smart contracts, NFTs, etc. arise as a consequence of the underlying architecture being this distributed blockchain.
what you can do with bus lanes is take an existing multi-lane road, and turn it into a single lane road + a dedicated bus lane. This has the advantage of making things easier for the bus and also harder for cars. So people start to see they can actually save time by taking the bus
The actors know their lines well, they don’t need direction. In German, it’s called Gleichschaltung.
Currently it looks like ai generated content, as well as model weights can't be copyrighted. Either way, free reign for everyone would be great. But I'm afraid big rights holders will try and lobby against this.
The points that you (and other commenters) make is ultimately related to the fact that when a person being shunned belongs to an outgroup, they are categorized as a representative sample of the group. In other words, the entire group is assumed to be consisted of homogeneous individuals, exhibiting roughly the same behavior as the one being discredited.

However, if said person were to belong to an ingroup, then said person is categorized as an outlier by its members.

We can see lots of such examples in politics, such as people casting similar aspersions about how the recent action of a single person in an outgroup proves the larger aspirations of said group, about how "they're out to destroy society", and the like.
Right. I believe IP restrictions are harmful, don’t actually do what we commonly believe they do, and are a significant net negative to society. I am in favor of either slowly or quickly abolishing IP restrictions. Tho I think it would need to be done slowly to avoid shocks to an economy which has become dependent on these restrictions.
In wonder if copyrighted content will be needed at all in the future of AI training.

AlphaZero learned to play chess via self-play, not by reading books about chess.

Why couldn't the same happen for art for example?

For coding, won't a sufficiently advanced neural net be able to figure out how to use a programming language when given just the documentation?

And when most of our interactions are with AI, it will learn from our conversations with it. Asking some AI system why feature X was removed from programming language Y in version Z teaches it something. The next person who asks it which feature was removed from Y in version Z might be told "X". Without the AI system ever having to read about it. The interaction with AI could become a self-learning loop in and on itself.
The library pays/paid for those books (usually at much greater cost exactly because they're meant to be accessible), most often through taxes.
No, it's not. Bitcoin payments are legal in most jurisdictions.
> Any (useful) JSON decoder code cannot go faster that this.

That line feels like a troll. Cunningham’s Law in action.

You can definitely go faster than 2 Gb/sec. In a word, SIMD.
So M5 in Milan is completely automated AND underground.

According to the Italian Wikipedia page the cost was of 1.3B € for 13kms.

For a cheaper 100m€/km

While the cost is comparable with Montreal, the Italian one is completely underground.
How is it not ?

> If the bank has filed a SAR, it isn’t legally allowed to tell you, and the federal government prosecutes only a small fraction of the people whom the banks document in their SARs.

Sounds worryingly similar to an effective violation of habeas corpus ?

P.S.: To make the matters worse, it looks that trying to rely more on cash as an insurance against getting debanked, raises your risk of getting debanked !
Effective Altruism is nth degree utilitarianism which even a college freshman can tell you has very unsatisfying answers to all kinds of fairly trivial ethical puzzles.

Not even remotely surprising that a sociopathic fraudster subscribed to these ideas. It's the same kind of ethical framework that early 20th century eugenicists were quite fond of.
Zvi has an extremely long review of the Michael Lewis book which makes it clear to me that you're right, this is hyperbole.

https://thezvi.wordpress.com/2023/10/24/book-review-going-in...
> You can’t just deny immigration in every country in the world and have the worlds oppressed and poor floating in international waters.

I understand that this shouldn't happen for moral reasons, but at least some aspects of that are very likely - if anything, it seems totally fictional to expect that the unequal burdens and harms of the climate changes will be shared equally by the world offering all the support, all our history and sociology demonstrates that while there will definitely be some charity and support, on the grand scale the self-interest of various groups will be a dominating factor.
Have you actually read the Tesla "patent pledge" [1]? It is ridiculously unfair.

Tesla agrees to not sue you for patent infringement as long as you have not "asserted, helped others assert or had a financial stake in any assertion of (i) any patent or other intellectual property right against Tesla...".

Tesla will not assert patents if you agree to not assert any intellectual property right against Tesla which includes patents and copyright and trademark and possibly even trade secrets (I am not sure if trade secret misappropriation would normally be classified under intellectual property rights).

Tesla specifically reserves the right to assert patent rights if you "marketed or sold any knock-off product (e.g., a product created by imitating or copying the design or appearance of a Tesla product or which suggests an association with or endorsement by Tesla)" which explicitly carves out their copyright and trademark rights as protected while demanding you give up yours.

Tesla's "patent pledge" is about as honestly named as the USA PATRIOT Act. It exists purely as a bad-faith attempt to claim the moral high ground so they can blame others for hating cooperation when their terms are so utterly unfair that no sane person would ever willingly agree to them.

[1] https://www.tesla.com/legal/additional-resources#patent-pled...
Didn't the Google Assistant do this for a while? It could interact with certain popular services (Uber, Doordash, Amazon, etc.). There was a minor splash when that feature launched a few years ago, but haven't heard much about it since then.

In my experience of having tried it, it only worked right about 60% of the time, which wasn't worth the hassle of having to correct it all the time. It was easier just to pull up the app and see the immediate visual feedback every step of the way.
Yeah you have to really separate the lanes and go heavy with cameras and fines (at least at the start). One thing that never works is when municipalities are too timid to really close off roads/lanes for buses and instead opt for a bit of paint and "cars can still cross here if they need to"
The best frying pan I've ever owned is the cheapest-possible cast iron one I got when I moved out of my parents' house 30 years ago or so. Very rarely does anything stick and when it does I fill the pan half way with water, put it back on the stove, let it boil for a couple of minutes while I do something else and then wipe it clean.

I have parrots so I theoretically have a strict "no Teflon in my house" rule but with a Japanese wife I've had to grudgingly tolerate a Teflon-coated rice cooker.
Show HN: I built an iPad game toddlers almost with aider AI pair programmer
I follow all bicycle related accidents and deaths in my country (as a board member of our bike association), and I've never heard of any serious accidents related to this. It's a non-issue. And as you're saying, the main danger is cars. So having more people bike their kids around is safer for everybody, if they were to stop biking like that it would just be yet another dangerous car on the road.
But the change is not a 1:1 linear ratio. Demand increases, but only if there is pain that more could use. Once a room is bright enough you won't add more light.
Close. But the few descriptions I’ve read don’t seem to talk about avoiding new system calling to old system
Yes. And the cost of providing of usably pervasive public transit is a huge part of that.

I live in Cambridge, MA (attached to Boston and sharing one of the top 5 transit systems in the US). We have one car per driver and expect to maintain or exceed that ratio for the next three decades as we can’t afford to spend the increased time needed to do all trips via transit. Or even transit plus ride-share.
Institutionally, EA was defending SBF up until he was arrested, not up until the point he started saying stupid shit. He was doing that for a long time before he was arrested.

https://time.com/6262810/sam-bankman-fried-effective-altruis...
Using 4D technology to produce cardiac pulses in arteries in vitro
If not for Wilhoit's law, we wouldn't have any laws at all!
If A380s were cheaper per flight than A320s, we'd use them for almost everything. Airport too small? Make it bigger and save money. If reusability works as planned, Starship could be cheaper per launch than this thing, which is not fully reusable.
> promising to solve the world's woes through a calculator.

SBF || !SBF that was the problem
The law doesn't care whether it solves their problem. It doesn't make it lawful to circumvent banking regulations. Governments have bills to pay and it's illegal to disobey.
I disagree with this - traditional philanthropy does ignore systematic/societal problems, for many reasons it is simply unable to.

EA tries to look at the bigger picture of effectiveness, and many within EA do believe that political solutions are a good use of resources. For example, many of the new charities created by Charity Entrepreneurship spend their time lobbying governments. Relative to traditional philanthropy, I think EA has a real shot at the systemic changes necessary to make real change.
I'm disappointed this uses the "90s" imperative GUI building paradigm, with manual state updates. QML, Slint and most web toolkits in the last 10 years gave this important topic more attention and are much better GUI frameworks for it.

Oh well, maybe someone will write a wrapper for this like relm.
Scale and speed of adoption influencing the impact on the value of the source material.

A person can only service a few projects a year and it takes day or weeks on ingest new knowledge. A trained network only needs to train once and faster than a person, it can then be replicated and is only limited by computing power.

That skews the market and the value of the books. I would not write a book if it was then ingested by and AI and never sold to a person.
Why was he trying to start his car? I'm glad he couldn't figure it out otherwise he could have killed someone. This is a personal responsibility thing.
Sort of, the time restricted eating the article is about would require something different, like a pill that stops your body from absorbing some nutrients for 12 hours or something like that.
Copyright holders make all kinds of arguments for why they should be get money for incidental exposure to their work. This is all about greed and jealousy. If someone uses AI to make infringing content, existing laws already cover that. The fact that an ML model could be used to generate infringing content, and has exposure to or "knowledge" of some copyrighted material is immaterial. People just see someone else making money and want to try and get a piece of it.
Looks like they want to create a city purely with profits from fossil fuel sales.
"[Stockton] Rush said in a 2021 interview, "I've broken some rules to make [the OceanGate Titan]. I think I've broken them with logic and good engineering behind me. The carbon fiber and titanium, there's a rule you don't do that. Well, I did.""

"Numerous industry experts had raised concerns about the safety of the vessel. OceanGate executives, including Rush, had not sought certification for Titan, arguing that excessive safety protocols and regulations hindered innovation."

"Rush replied that he was "tired of industry players who try to use a safety argument to stop innovation ... We have heard the baseless cries of 'you are going to kill someone' way too often. I take this as a serious personal insult"."

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_submersible_implosion

"In particular, he was critical of the Passenger Vessel Safety Act of 1993, a United States law which regulated the construction of ocean tourism vessels and prohibited dives below 150 feet, which Rush described as a law which "needlessly prioritized passenger safety over commercial innovation"."

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockton_Rush
Cool.

For those who didn't already know it: Emacs also has a built-in hex editor. Just visit a file and type M-x hexlify-buffer.
> He was stealing from rich people

I am not familiar with all of the intimate details, I did not think that the scam was targeted at "rich people" but rather advertised generally and preyed upon get-rich-quick crypto attitudes. Am I mistaken?
The whole point of over-sized water tanks isn't to be the most efficient, only to supply a lot of demand when at times of the day when there is surplus energy. Right now, solar and wind are being curtailed more and more.

Also, water consistency isn't that big a problem. Today's 120v heat pump water heaters store water at higher temperatures and using a mixing valve to deliver the desired temperature of water. I am just saying, surely electric water tanks, mixing valves, and temperature sensors are orders of magnitude cheaper than the amount of batteries needed to heat an equivilant amount of water.
> For all sizes of json and all scenarios of usage, Sonic performs best.

The repository has benchmarks
I use them all the time for lab work. What they're meant for.

If you really need LTSC for prod they are available too as such :)
> People just see someone else making money in a way that is completely dependent upon their own prior work and want to try and get a piece of it
And there is Realtime Operating System too.
It's not a difficult process to maintain your own repo overlay that keeps old packages for longer than the mainline.

One reason they are trimmed is because old version of $package don't build with new version of $library which is a big dependency (eg vte) that is moving forward so keeping the old ones, and maintaining them gets more and more difficult as time moves on. It's not Gentoo forcing the churn, it's the things Gentoo packages that are churning and it becomes visible at the Gentoo layer.

But your own overlay, or just pinning your build can easily solve that (eg, still using PostgreSQL 9)
No, I mean what's the point of turning on autonomous driving mode if you have to keep your hands on the wheel and your eyes on the road at all times? That's worse than actually driving the car yourself.
You still think he was actually going to give away his money?