skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's also psychologically easier to manage. People have an easier time building a schedule where they do or don't eat and holding it (say, by skipping breakfast) than they do managing counting calories around things like "I went out to dinner and probably ate too much".

Binary choices (should I eat right now?) take much less cognitive overhead than spectral choices (What should I eat? How much of it? If I eat X and Y now will I have the capacity to eat Z later?)
Cruise CEO Confirms Coming Layoffs Amid Scramble to Rebuild Public Trust
This one didn't. It was literally just a featureless button, engineered with intelligence it couldn't possibly need except as a means of locking out third-party hardware.
> Of course, you might find that your perfectly clean code isn't as helpful as you expected, depending on what you see as "clean."

To add to this, people will have different opinions on what is "clean". In fact you will have different opinions on what is "clean"!

I've lost count of the times I've written some code, only to come back the next day and re-write it into a "cleaner" version.

Like writing an essay, it takes time and iteration, and sometimes there just isn't a stable solution. This has somewhat helped me in just writing the damn code (but my ADHD brain still habitually reaches for "perfection" over "get it done")
I remember reading about someone who could not brew coffee anymore because the cert on their "smart coffee maker" had expired and the business had gone under.. they discovered that by attempting to use wireshark, of all things, to take a peek. I thought "this moment right here is where people will catch up to it, no way we can go even further".

This was like 7+ years ago.

https://twitter.com/internetofshit
Texans Vote in Favor for Fund to Fix Faulty Grid
Which was that?
Is it possible some of the area it uses protein from is old cells? I'm thinking parts of digestive system, immune system, old cells it scrubs and reclaims some protein from when fasting. Still catabolic but useful catabolic?
I'm super curious about this concept. I watched All The Rage about Dr Sarno, who treats back pain with the same mind-body approach. Its fascinating that the results are so drastic for people who've been healed by the mind-body approach - that they're not cured over months in the gym but over the course of the time they've read the material.
> We have cushy and sedentary jobs that many could do and even more would die to have.

Wrong, are you a manager in disguise?
Insurance companies do. The human driver is only free of liability when the autonomy is activated so the hands of the customer are not so relevant
I don't understand why you'd want a floating point random.

It just seems like a terrible idea (as opposed to int)
For your total completion stats in Steam it doesn't count games that you have not earned any achievements in, it may be the same for global stats.
Level design was my first contact with the development side of games, i remember spending a lot o time to make the most miserable and unplayable maps on valve hammer editor, to at one point have a map used in a zombie mode of a server on cs 1.6. Amazing to see these communities stil exists
Color me surprised. Imagine this when OpenAI with all its "plugins", API and closed architecture is integrated into thousands of businesses. It will be beautiful:)
Many questions that aren’t definitively answerable are nonetheless worth repeating to ask each generation, since the alternative is an ossified answer treated as if it were definitive (ie a particularly stagnant religious dogma) or that we fall back on simplistic answers that further thought would trouble.

Questions of value and purpose and the use of power are chief among these.
It doesn't really seem like a sunk cost.

If you assume with the right management, a coworking space CAN be a viable business, wework as a brand is still highly valuable.

Now if we assume coworking spaces are completely non-viable, then yeah close up shop. But the various successful coworking spaces around the world suggest that isn't true.
You’re responding to a caricature you’ve constructed, not to the post I made.

In this case, it’s not freeloading (l)users who left The Escapist in response to its new direction, but its own employees. And their immediate next action was to start their own publication with their own talent, but without the higher‐ups. That suggests that they believe their approach of producing quality content was financially sustainable. Time will tell if that’s true.
The point is that all 3 of those are more tabloid than serious journalistic outlets.
I have issues with unions becoming way too powerful and prevent things from being done efficiently. I get certain aspects are safety related like needing an electrician to come in to wire up certain things. But I've had a friend that was a network installer that was allowed to mount the gear in the rack and wire in the low voltage ethernet cabling, but was not allowed to attache the power cord. That required the time of an electrician union member. On their schedule. After installing the gear, he had to wait doing nothing until this could happen. These types of rules are dumb, but show the overreaching power of unions.

There are plenty of stories/examples (so not just n=1) of these kinds of boneheaded rules that just make things very inefficient.
Citizen Surveillance Ate San Francisco
> just a small portion of power users?

It is exactly this. Average Joe just downloads the MyQ app for remote control. Or uses Wyze, or Tapo, Kasa, etc, for whatever they buy. The number of people trying to get everything integrated into a single environment like Home Assistant is low. Which makes sense, because HA is a pain in the ass if you're not already technically inclined. Regular folks just don't have any appetite to deal with that.
Wow interesting. Do you work anywhere else but at home?
SoftBank or its investors might view WeWork as a hedge against something else. The overall portfolio might make sense even when some individual investments go south.
Generative AI in Search expands to more than 120 new countries and territories
Same here in Sweden - when a company doesn’t have a collective agreement they also don’t have a right to have peace with the unions, so then the unions can put pressure on them to get a collective agreement and when that succeeds there will be a collective agreement that then apply to all employees
> I'm glad it's legal to film, particularly when you want to protect yourself when reporting a crime and you fear police reprisal for some reason.

I am not glad it's legal to film, because of the risk of reprisal from criminals you may be going in to the police department to talk about.
If I was Neumann or Son, I wouldn't be visiting Saudi Arabia.
You have to know what precision means to claim you think with precision. Most philosophy believes the false idea that one can't know reality, thus generally ends up a waste of time.
>you're acting as though an immigrant from any of the dense population centers has the same impact as a native-born child on the culture and economy. that is false

I am not, i am acting like immigrating literally anybody is going to be massively better than a declining population. If they live in a country, they are paying for housing, food, and services, and almost certainly have a job. taxes on top of all of that. I think the attitude of being picky is fine and wise, right now, but eventually you are really going to just want anyone instead of going inverted.
We have no such race to the bottom here in Sweden
If you have trouble remembering jq syntax (or any other weird CLIs) I'd reccomend increasing the number of lines of history stored in your shell and finding a way (I use FZF) to search through that history.

I do a quick ctrl+r, type jq, and I can find all of my JQ snippets I've used in the past couple of years. If I then type "select" I can find all of the times I've used that function, etc.

I also use it to find while loops, kubectl snippets, environment variables I exported to run a script, etc.
Looks like a couple of people downvoted this question. Sadly, it's a real concern.

This belief that you can't get healthcare seems to be a major issue, to me. People simply don't get healthcare because they believe, wrongly, that they will have to pay for it, or that they can't get it despite socialized systems being in place.

You have to file, just like you do in every other country. But in the UK, for example, there's no smear campaign telling all the poor, wrongly, that they can't get care so they shouldn't even bother filling out the form.

If you, or someone you know, believes they can't get care because they are too poor, please refer them to healthcare.gov and help them through the enrollment. They may need to file their taxes first, and you may need to help them with that too. Under $50k, you will pay nothing for coverage.

Yes, the self employed in the US pay premium prices for health. They also get premium tax breaks so I think they should stop complaining about it.

For perspective, someone making around $200k-$250 would pay about $1200/mo. for a 3 person household with a $6000 deductible and an HSA (paid by employer) that covers that deductible, so basically zero cost outside of that.

That's just $4800/yr/person.

Compared with a fully socialized healthcare country with highly successful application, the cost in healthcare taxes would be more for someone in that earnings category.

I've run the same figures for taxes in several EU and non-EU countries and they match.

There's just not that much difference, as far as I can tell, except that the care is better from the perspective of many friends living abroad and spending far more than I do because they are paying the health tax and ALSO paying extra for private care.

It's a real issue that people think they can't get care. Please help them, rather than perpetuate the problem.
Imagine if Apple's or Google's cloud went down and all your apps on iPhone and Android were broken and unavailable. Absolutely all apps on billions of phones.

Cloud =! OpenAI

Clouds store and process shareable information that multiple participants can access. Otherwise AI agents == new applications. OpenAI is the wrong evolution for the future of AI agents
My favourite implementation is

double random_double(rng_t *rng) {
return((double)(random_uint64(rng) >> 11) * 0x1.0p-53);
}

It has the advantage of not needing bit_cast (which C lacks) and has 53 instead of 52 bits of randomness.
> For general cloud, avoiding screwing might mean multi cloud. But for LLM, there’s only one option at the highest level of quality for now.

There's always only one at the highest level of quality at a fine-grained enough resolution.

Whether there's only one at sufficient quality for use, and if it is possible to switch between them in realtime without problems caused by the switch (e.g., data locked up in the provider that is down) is the relevant question, and whether the cost of building the multi-provider switching capability is worth it given the cost vs. risk of outage. All those are complicated questions that are application specific, not ones that have an easy answer on a global, uniform basis.
You can request to have content filtering turned off https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/openai/c...
> An alternate approach would be to use the auto-update features of the terminal and force the app distributors to sign and push a trojan to that specific target.

This is a compelling reason to build from source for e2e messagers. Google's move to signing apks with their own keys helps facilitate the above.
>Except they don't, they use unified shared memory.

Yes, which is what allows the GPU to address all 128GB of the available RAM! This makes it possible to do lots of things that the laptop you linked to can't do.

>If you want a 128GB GPU, that is only possible with [cards used in professional graphics workstations]

That is exactly the point. But I think you know that.
The argument is sometimes made that philosophy is the mother of all other academic traditions - once a philosophical idea reaches a sufficient level of promise or maturity, it spins off into its own discipline, as in the speciation of "natural philosophy" into specialized hard sciences. One might even point to psychology (or even more contentiously and partially, computer science) as a 20th century offshoots of philosophy.

That story seems excessively tidy and flattering, and in any case, its pessimistic corrolary is that most of today's philosophy is a junk drawer of dead-end intellectual projects that never yielded anything useful. The shoe certainly seems to fit most philosophical sub-disciplines, like metaphysics and ethics.

Anyway, the article is a fairly (though maybe inevitably) partisan read on the crisis of philosophy. The author pretty casually dismisses some views which are pretty popular among philosophers - examples include the idea that philosophical theories are rival, and can be disproven; and the view that philosophy is supposed to be therapeutic (the rejection of this view is especially surprising given that it was pretty much universal among the archetype philosophers, the Ancient Greeks). The author appears to favor the view that the point of philosophy is to "articulate cultural self-understanding" (or, "[promoting] cultural self-consciousness"). Seems reasonable enough I guess, but I'm not sure what it means.
The $100 billion they made from AliBaba gave them a lot of headroom to fail.
I'm not degreed, been working with and for PhD's, people with and without degrees for 3 decades including several stints at valley startups and never heard anyone use the term backpressure outside of a mechanical engineering context.
Ok, changed from https://www.loudersound.com/news/an-original-photograph-of-t.... Thanks!
I don't know where you got that idea from. There is a movement in the complete opposite direction with CXL. Don't waste your time with silly libraries, serialisation or networking. Have a rack that is filled with nothing but memory pooled RAM and then connect your servers (which still retain RAM as a L4 cache). You now have a huge shared memory machine with distributed CPUs using CXL for cache coherence accross the entire system. There have been benchmarks that kept 75% of the memory outside the server and the performance degradation was only 10% compared to keeping the entire data set on a single server.
One thing that has helped me write simple/intermediate jq code is this: Imagine what the context is for your filter. Most importantly, update that context at each pipe character '|'.

On an empty command, the context is the top-level of your JSON. As you add filter stages, that context evolves.

(this really requires more explanation and diagrams than I have room for in this margin)
Ok? You don't have a Mx Model that relies heavily on using the SSD, so who cares about your anecdotal experience?
For sighted users, show indeterminate progress element while form is submitting. For sight-impaired users, use aria live region for accessible status messages (as noted in article).

For more info on status messages: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/status-messages....

Were there any other UX concerns you had with this pattern?
> world really seem REALLY misplaced to me. Population growth concerns are easily mitigated with immigration which will stay in demand until the rest of the worlds fertility rates catch up(40+ years)

The population of prospective immigrants who completed 12 years of education or more is already largely gone, because the fertility rates in countries with this level of development are either already below replacement or on the way to it at a rapid pace.

And you need at least that to contribute to an advanced economy.
Kagi just serves Google results though. But it has some nifty extra features to be sure.
Google has now called me more than 200 times
> True, it's more mentally demanding than anything else.

This is just not true. Going back to my example, doctors and nurses have more mentally _and_ physically demanding jobs.

> Point still stands though.

It doesn’t. There are harder jobs, both mentally and physically. And most software development is generic and not that complex work that a lot of people could do.

We are only snowflakes in the sense that we think we are special, and that comparatively we have very nice salaries (at least in the US).
The real reality distortion field is Masa continuing to raise funds for some truly dogshit investments.
FDA Approves Lilly's Zepbound (Tirzepatide) for Chronic Weight Management
my friend in college bought texts books before the first semester when their parents took them to the book store. then a classmate showed them libgen and didn't buy any more text books except the one weird custom textbook by some professor.

i guess they buy all their books now that they have a job, but also with generous use of used book stores and physical libraries.

oh and dont buy though amazon, especially kindle.
> Ford misjudging demand is a screw up, but it’s definitely a been a success.

as problems go, that's a good one to have.

and keep in mind that covid, economic upheavals, and chip shortages messed with car production hard. labor issues may also be a challenge.
My Startup Sabbatical Led Me to Update My Berkeley CS Class
What do you think of this lab proposal for a data structures class?
International solidarity between unions is a natural part of being a union

(Well, unless when you want to protect jobs from moving abroad, then the solidarity is gone. Eg. the German unions are great at ensuring that any job cuts happens in other European countries instead of in Germany)
Comparing to physical engineering doesn't make much sense to me.

Part of the problem is it's all virtual, so there are no limits; part is that we're always pushing the envelope in the complexity department.

Building the same software again with just a tweak or two doesn't happen very much, the reason we build new systems is often to try something so different that it's not feasible to adapt existing systems.

Most of the time we have no idea exactly what we're building until we get there, even the customers usually have no idea exactly what they want.

Imagine going to a car manufacturer and giving them the kind of specifications we usually get for software, I can assure you they wouldn't be able to give you a good estimate either.

Research is a better comparison. How long will it take you to build a fusion reactor? Depends, right?
I disagree with this take. This implies that pathos is a more durable political mechanism than logos, or that in the short term pathos is more impactful.
I'd expand that: Wikipedia's greatness is due to its policies and guidelines in general. It is not surprising that they were drafted by a second-time encyclopedist and PhD in epistemology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger

The next best thought out knowledge-based site is StackExchange.
Doesn’t answer my q really. At least in kubernetes scaling is done by measuring usage against the request (shares) not the limit (quota)
It's a good ruling, but the NYPD will almost certainly ignore it. The worst part is that any restitution will come in the form of fines, which are paid not by police officers, but by taxpayers.

NYPD officers can break the law with complete impunity, because a third party (the taxpayers) is paying for both their legal fees and any punitive fines.
Many of the algorithms for generating random numbers from different distributions want to start with uniform floats in [0,1) or (0,1]
While dietary adherence might be easier with that eating schedule, it isn't optimal from a protein metabolism standpoint. With any calorie restricted diet you risk losing lean muscle along with fat so you need to get enough protein to mitigate that (along with certain types of exercise and other factors). And that protein should to be split across at least two separate meals in order for your digestive system to process it effectively.

https://peterattiamd.com/donlayman/
I’m unsure what you’re saying here, can you clarify?

Is it that Baseline seems overly bureaucratic and will be ineffective, or that people should not support any CSAM lists at all?
You've never worked in a pharmacy have you? :)
> Not sure where you live, but every house I've lived in (USA, a few different states) during my entire life has had an exterior-quality door with exterior-quality lock, including deadbolt, between the house and garage.

Likewise, but even if it's actually locked, no lock is impenetrable, and a closed garage provides a thief with the privacy to pick it at leisure or even break down the door. Burglary deterrence advice sometimes includes tips like adjusting your landscaping so your front door is visible from the street and locking gates to your back yard. Letting the thief into your garage thoroughly defeats the point of that...

Also, I keep stuff (bikes) in the garage that I don't want stolen.
Having been in the industry for 10 years, I would agree that after a certain point, your personal opinions about code style tend to change less and become more consistent, but I still run into enough other people that also have a lot of experience, yet seem to have entirely different views.

Out of interest, what kinds of things would you consider "beautiful" or "devilish"?
Why? It's one thing to dismember journalists (The despots running that country don't want them anywhere around them), but when you start doing that to businessmen, nobody is going to do business with you.

The only message it will send is that they are roughly on the level of El Chapo, or some other cartel leader, when it comes to 'Should I work with these guys?'
I've never seen a design guide quite like this before, because this guide essentially tells me how to construct a content-oriented web site from parts.

Since I'm a run-of-the-mill data-oriented app developer I'm familiar with design languages like Material, Ant Design, Microsoft Fluent, etc.
But those design languages don't tell me how to structure a run-of-the-mill admin panel app from parts.

Does anyone know of a guide for a data-oriented application similar to this?
Indeed, cryptography for information transfer has been a successful technology. This is due to the work of many activists leveraging the prior existence of the fundamental rights related to communicating freely in the constitutions of many countries. Despite this, as you say, governments have tried to make laws around this, which are partly successful. But there is a crucial difference between cryptography for communication and cryptocurrencies.

You have to provide an account of your financial activities at the end of the year to your government, and lying on it will get you in serious hot water. You don't have to annually tell the government who you communicated with and how. So, you using encryption technology will never land you in trouble, unless the government catches you. For instance, millions pirate copyright material around the world, but governments find it very difficult to catch the ones setting up the sharing sites.

But any non-trivial usage of cryptocurrency has to be reported by you to the government, and if you don't the tax authorities will come after you. So the government at this point has close to complete control over which cryptocurrency transactions you can freely engage in, and which ones you can't.
So long as all traffic on the interoperable network can be caller-ID’d to the sender, that’s likely to be what we’ll get: anyone can talk on the network, and – just like iMessage today – authorities can trace, identify, and shutdown abusive senders.
Sadly, this is a pittance for the Saudis.

They’re blowing away trillions building stupid mega projects in the desert. A few billion is small potatoes
PSA: Put your cash in a money market instead of a savings account