skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Shush, don’t say those things because maybe people discussing merge vs rebase will realize they don’t discuss but just talk side by side.

One and the other does not care what is the context and what they discuss but apparently each one just knows better.

I also don’t mean those specific users - but in general any git discussion I saw for last 10+ years.
What makes you think the LLM couldn’t run a debugging session from the content of a JIRA ticket and the whole code base + documentation?
Probably not the answer you're looking for, but the web UI has chat history export built-in, and from there you could search it yourself with local tools (plain grep, or more ElasticSearch-like engines), or use the new 128k context to ask questions of your chat history with GPT-4 (though that seems a bit, recursive?)
It's apparently possible to accomplish this without surgery, through neuroplasticity [0]. But why do that when there's a super cool, complex, expensive, technological solution?

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/feb/08/man-walks-of...
Yep

https://wwd.com/eye/parties/hypebeast-party-uv-lights-injuri...
>Though you might notice though that most folks dont go around abusing animals or hurting other people on purpose. Take from that what you will.

It doesn't matter what "most folks" go about doing. If anything it makes things all the scarier. All this destruction we've caused to so many other species and we weren't even trying.
Netflix pays above-grade salaries. A few years ago, I interviewed there for a position that was two levels below my current title but paid 2x more than I made.

Netflix pays well because they don't believe in work-life balance, at all. The position I interviewed for was vacant because the previous individual had left. By the time I wrapped up the interviews, the person I would have reported to had left Netflix, and the person who would have been my direct report would have been my boss. By the time I actually declined the offer, that person had also left.)
Putting aside the political portion, this seems like it could potentially lead to Wiki being "behind the times" at the least and stifling advancements at the extreme. The telescope was once fringe, and rightly so. Imagine reading that some guy had been able to see something in the sky that you can't see, you gotta trust him bro.

Modern medical practice was a fringe view two hundred years ago.

My point is if you hide the fringe then you either get left behind or prevent others from moving forward.
Is there something wrong with the latest version of the method? Instead of one from ~18 months ago which may not work any longer?
I think it makes more sense to just consider why they're even building it. Their goal is to build an AGI, for which they think they need data and compute. They need market reach and revenue to make data access feasible and open investor's wallets for compute, and anything that makes the data easier to get and isn't too hard to do is going to help them on their main goal. Whisper being as widely available as possible is going to result in a lot more human origin language, not just in their services that are trainable, but on the web as a whole. Releasing whisper does basically nothing to increase output of machine generated text, and increases the amount of human text on the internet, so it's a net win. The actual calculation is then going to be on how hard it is to make, and my guess is that for the top AI research team in the world with Microsoft resources, it turned out to be a pretty easy problem to comprehensively solve.
It'd have to be s/gi/gri/
Without seeing your resume, it is difficult to answer your question. For me, all the crypto stuff on a resume would be a flag. Maybe not a red flag, but pink or orange. I know it is a personal opinion, but the entire crypto industry is tainted in my eyes.
My teacher made me do a full force brake during my training. It was more intense than I had anticipated, and my teacher forgot that he still had his sunglasses on his head, which promptly smashed into the windshield :D
> Beautiful art too.

I just looked over a couple of trailers. I think this makes my watchlist.

About the artwork... reminded me of Another World [0, 1] but with the better rez of today.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Another_World_(video_game)?use...

[1] Walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjMf_bEfqIc
What this article means by "incompatible" is that the two chips are not interchangeable. That's because they have different physical connections.

By saying they are incompatible the article implies that they could never be used in the same server but I don't see any evidence for that. You'd just need the server to have both types of socket.
As I got towards the end of the article, I was thinking of The Sharper Image--and there it was. DAK tickles something somewhere in my brain somewhere so I'm sure I saw it. There was a certain sub-genre in the days of print catalogs; SkyMall/Brookstone/Hammacher Schlemmer that were at least adjacent to this space which were probably more distinguished by their pitches than the actual products.
What would this organisation do if it finds that you are using this account for money laundering / terrorism financing? Is the suggestion that it should have to get a court order to close your account, or that even then it should leave your account open?
Java more productive than go?
Here is a quote from the COVID-19 lab leak theory article[1] as an example of how Wikipedia's NPOV policy is implemented. I'll let it speak for itself.

"The lab leak theory is informed by racist undercurrents, and has resulted in anti-Chinese sentiment. [...] While the proposed scenarios are theoretically subject to evidence-based investigation, it is not clear than any can can be sufficiently falsified to placate lab leak supporters, and they are fed by pseudoscientific and conspiratorial thinking."

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_lab_leak_theory
I strongly disagree with this view for applications, and mildly disagree for infrastructure projects.

There is one thing I believe Go is by far and away the leader at: keeping codebases maintainable over time.

Go is designed very clearly with this goal and it's excellent at it. The verbosity you complain about makes it much, much clearer what something is doing.
That coupled with some of the baked in opinions means it is significantly more straightforward to pick up code that you or someone else wrote a few years ago and modify it.
Ironically, the rest of the paragraph you quoted from gives their reasoning why they believe this tool is needed beyond "whoever wants to get paid for their published content online is an enemy of democracy". Double-plus democracy and all that...
Crossword puzzles! They make very interesting combinatorial problems (both for solving and creating grids). I recently had a ton of fun writing a constraint programming model that generates grids, including the automatic placement of black squares (this was the main modeling challenge). This model is useful for creating grids using short word lists (which is the case for e.g. thematic grids).
Hoarding is so much more efficient and fun with technological assistance. </sarc>
If you had such a ftp service, there was a good chance that eventually you'd end up unwittingly serving porn out of a twisted little maze of nested directories with embedded special characters an the like.

This killed a fair few useful-but-not-important sites.
Everybody's got their own calculus about how competitive their space is and what this tech can do for them, but some might be best off dancing around lock-in by being careful about what they use from OpenAI and how tightly they integrate with it.

This is very early in the maturity cycle for this tech. The options that will be available for private inference and fine tuning, for cloud-gpu/timeshare inference and fine tuning, and for competing hosted solutions are going to vastly different as months go by. What looks like squeezing value out of OpenAI today might look a lot like technical debt and frustrating lock-in a year from now.

That's what they're hoping you chase after, and if your product is defined by this technology, maybe that's what you have to do. But if you're just thinking about feature opportunities for a more robust product, judiciousness could pay off better than rushing. For now.
They also said millions of people are trading NFTs every day or something, I don’t remember.
> In a modern (<10 year old) car I question the "pro driver" result. I've been looking for data on this, and haven't seen anything that says this is true, but have seen the opposite.

There is an old SAE paper published by Chrysler that I can't find at the moment. IIRC, it was published in 1968 or 1969, and evaluated their new all-wheel[1] ABS system (later to be sold on the 1969-1973 Imperial).

The gist of it is that on most surfaces relevant passenger cars, ABS gives somewhat ~shorter~ [Edit: longer ] stopping distances but the difference is minimal compared to a trained professional driver, and both are significantly shorter than locking the wheels (what a non-pro is likely to do in a panic situation)

On ice, locking the wheels produces stopping distances that are several times greater than threshold braking. Wet pavement (especially asphalt) is better for ABS, too, though not as extreme as ICE. Importantly, threshold braking also enables the driver to maintain directional control on all surfaces, especially when the left and right wheels have different amounts of traction. ABS enables the driver to concentrate on steering while the computer adjusts the brakes.

However, on dry concrete, as well as gravel or snow, locking the wheels does produce somewhat shorter stopping distances. (Concrete tends to be aggressively textured, almost like sandpaper; gravel and snow can build up a "ramp" ahead of a locked wheel)

The only problem with locking for emergency stops is that 1) you wear the tires down to the cords after about 10 such emergency stops from 60 mph on dry concrete; and 2) the vehicle tends to spin. If the driver should happen to back off the brake pressure while partially spun, the vehicle will depart the road before they can react... so if you're going to lock the wheels, you have to really commit to it.

[1] Chrysler had 4-wheel ABS 10 years before Mercedes' "first car in the world with 4-wheel ABS", but Chrysler had computer logic to release brake pressure on both rear wheels if either one slipped (it had sensors in both rear wheels), which is how Mercedes was able to claim a "first" with their system that simply treated both rear wheels independently.
what I wrote was short, and I wrote what I needed to to express just what I wanted to express, i.e. nothing can eliminated.

Show me, rewrite some piece of what I wrote in your exalted tone that would be better. I want to learn from you. I'm not being sarcastic. I legitimately don't think you are right, and I legitimately don't think you can do it, but you say it can be done. I think you are falsely using "tone" to stand in for "you disagree with me".

But, if you can express what I expressed politely and palatably, please, I REALLY want to know how to do it. Let's teach each other, this site is built on curiosity.

If your tone is better, I will exalt it.

also, maybe read this, it's an interesting take: https://www.mit.edu/~jcb/tact.html
more startups should focus on foundation models, it's where the meat is. Ideally there won't be a need for any startup as the platform should be able to self-build whatever the customer wants.
So your official policy is to ban the fourth estate?
I think I need to become far more informed about these matters as this is rather surprising to read.

I’ve been watching Russia toddle about with their “second best in the world” equipment, demonstrating how difficult it can be. And now I’m reading that Houthi rebels have missiles that can make it outside some meaningful definition of “atmosphere”?

Maybe I’m failing to understand how modern military rocketry works.
> because motorcycles require a higher-level of attention and are significantly more dangerous to operate than a car.

For the driver. Cars are more dangerous than motorcycles for everybody but the people inside/on it, which means that swerving and braking exercises are actually much more necessary for car drivers than for motorcycle riders
Google Chrome extension taken down for using YouTube red color
I got my first set of speakers and a graphic EQ from DAK as a teen. Fun catalog and great customer service.
Ah, "do not staple, bend or fold"....that brings back some memories: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pTGf6Yw-1g
True, that wasn't my intent and you are right to draw this out into the open.

I have had the pleasure if witness a couple Matthew Butterick talks first hand and they are excellent. He is a great speaker and thinker. I have also seen the subject the article lose his cool a couple times. Which is not cool. Esp given his prominent place in the community. At this point and think he should make himself a bystander.
any suggestions for solo board games? not a genre that I'm familiar with
Thank you for naming the bank. I will make absolutely sure to avoid them and to warn others about them. Having something like that happen can be ruinous.
What's interesting to me is that in emergencies, apparently many people don't brake hard enough.

So now they've created brake-assist options that try to determine when such a case is occurring, and slam on the brakes as hard as the car is able.

As incredulous as that sounds, it's apparently improved overall safety.

From what I've read the tech has been around since the 90's but has become much more standard.
my case for good-looking history is pride of ownership. Are you proud of this "thing that makes money and ultimately pays your paycheck" or do you leave it polluted and full of crumbs and detritus?

I would have made this part of a root-level comment but I doubt anyone would read it, but: I think what gets lost in all these git debates is what language/context are we talking about? a shop that churns out javascript and releases to prod every 8 hours is very different than a C++ shop that writes safety-critical software. Their git needs are very different, and having an "I make my bed every day at 5:30am before I go for a 5mi run and come back and drink my juice and eat avocado toast" git regimen may be appropriate for some codebases but not for others where "I woke up hungover at 10am with a partner whose name I cannot remember, in a bed that is not mine" regimen. I think countless human-brain cycles are lost to bickering between these 2 camps.
As in, use an existing search and call it via 'function calling' as part of the assistants routine - rather than uploading documents to the assistant API?
What's the file upload limit? I can see many junior roles being replaced if a large corpus of data can be uploaded.
That is the same risk faced by calling out telekinesis and telepathy as pseudoscience with a history of belief.

Still, the advantage of an editable wikipedia is that when homeopathy has a repeatable significant trial result, when mind to mind messaging has the same, and when a mouse is levitated on demand the wiki articles can be updated to reflect the facts.
No, you're fine. It's the market probably. Keep grinding
Thank you!

Also possible candidates:

A few watts short of a lightbulb.

Their lights are on but nobody’s home.
I wish the article would recognize that while this is super wrong it's also been historically a rather common story going the other direction.
Colorado resident, here. I'd say 95% of people I know do one or the other. Probably 50% of people I know do both.
What is libel?

Ask Fox News that one, I hear they are a little over 700 million short from that stunt.
Arbitration is quicker and cheaper than litigation. That alone is enough to explain why they want it. There may well be bias, but merely the fact that companies want this is not evidence of it.
Unfortunately no, like a sunburn sometimes you don't feel it until later. This can also happen when hiking across snow covered plains under clear very bright skies. It's called snow blindness.
I think this very much is a personal perspective thing. Skiing is only increasing in popularity. Many ski resorts recording record high visitation this year. https://coloradosun.com/2023/05/29/national-ski-areas-record...
Nobody cares what a very low quality Arch derivative with no users yet strong SEO efforts does.

Let's not promote them by linking.
Scientist Claims Quantum RSA-2048 Encryption Cracking Breakthrough
Go's channels also have a lot of footguns and should be abstracted in a handle type in a public API.
> how did people deal with that?

Here it is, are you ready? They took all that time you waste on blogs, social networking, videos, games and web surfing, and used it to get their punched card shit done.
Thats exactly what i thought. Smart strategy on OpenAI's part given that its extremely easy (and free) to do RAG with pgvector.
If you judge productivity by lines of code, absolutely.

https://github.com/Hello-World-EE/Java-Hello-World-Enterpris... is an excellent demonstration of this.
"apparently possible"

In response to an article of a technique actually successfully working.

One dudes undiagnosed anecdote is not a gotcha on a literal medical marvel.
I leave you with an anecdote about him: once he was teaching a lecture and a student’s button was missing. He struggled to teach/cancelled the course and admitted the irritation was intense because of the button. My other philology friend told me.

Strange and interesting, makes me humanize and think about him in a different context.
Ask HN: What am I doing wrong?
I'm a new graduate with a CS degree. I've had two internship experiences and consistently work on side projects.

I apply to jobs every day, practice leetcode, and cold email recruiters. All this and to no avail. Not a single interview and a rare coding assessment -- usually provoking -- my "imposter syndrome."

That all said, what should I do? I get others are in the same boat, but I also hear about many of my peers getting job offers left and right. I attempted to implement what worked for them, but still nothing to show for it.

What am I doing wrong? What should I be doing?
I don't think your car has full brake by wire. You should be able to operate the brake (to some extent) even if the car systems are not fully working.

I also learnt that teslas (at least the 3 and y) don't do steer by wire so when you play the games using your steering wheel you so turn the wheels a little bit.
The generating function proof is also really beautiful! I think I maybe like it even more than the linear algebra proof.
I am utterly fascinated by Japanese joinery
When I've encountered this, I've just taken my foot off the accelerator and let the car gradually lose speed. Eventually, the person behind loses patience and passes me angrily.
For my masters I proposed that you could treat urban spaces as one giant interface (and that interface would appear different to different users). After stepping away from it for a while, I've gotten back into it. My main interest is information design for wayfinding, transit, and urban navigation. It's such a human problem and it's so fascinating.

Though he never called it such, a lot of it intersects with Donald Norman's work that he describes in "The Design of Everyday Things". Even the objects we intereact with are interfaces.

Drop me a line if you're looking to chat about it all.
The ChatGPT app is broken on IOS after the update. Image generation and code analysis no longer work
I hate updating video games. More often then not they remove some awesome exploits or feature that I may want to make use of or removing inappropriate content for censors
Embedded systems and electrical engineering. I knew close to nothing in either field and it is refreshing to learn a new field starting at the basics. Creating a practical, physical product is also very rewarding.
Where are you finding the descriptions you’re quoting? I can’t find the words ‘pejorative’ or ‘label’ anywhere in the linked article.
Maybe it's possible that depression and anxiety are normal things to feel in our dystopian world.
Committing headers in Merkle tree form or skip lists allow for logarithmic reduction in that number, as was worked out in the (2014?) sidechains whitepaper. 10’s of headers would be doable.
Not the parent, but I personally dislike it when Go libraries use channels in their public APIs, as it forces a specific concurrency model on the consumer; in particular, channels are quite slow, being protected by an internal mutex, so you're always paying for the overhead no matter if you need it or not.

You also have to be very careful about managing the channel lifecycle. If you're not pulling (selecting from) the channel, the library will be permanently stuck. So you must now have a way to tell the library to stop sending, and it must cancel any in-flight send operations if you call producer.Stop() or whatever. In my experience libraries often have bugs in their channel code. It's far too easy to get deadlocks with channels that have interdependencies, and you have to be very careful about buffered versus unbuffered channels, as they behave differently.

A better API, in my opinion, is to offer a callback or single-method interface. Then the implementer of that callback or interface can choose to use channels internally if they desire, or they can use something else. You get the same backpressure support since you can treat it as synchronous.

After all, a channel's send interface is essentially just:

type Channel[T any] interface {
Send(T)
}

But a "chan T" doesn't offer this flexibility.

My rule of thumb for channels is that they're goroutine glue, not an API primitive. Build APIs out of interfaces, not channels. The only thing that uses channels should be the one that's controlling the goroutines, because it's the thing that orchestrates them.

That said, it's not a hard rule. There are places where channels may have their place in a public API, though I'm not sure I can think of any examples off-hand.
Normal stores have product listings that make sense. Go complain about “word salad” product listings and AMZN tells you they only want to hear about it if you bought the item.

I’ve got little fear that Nike shoes at Dick’s sporting goods are really from Nike. I am always hearing about people buying something from AMZN which wasn’t what was described. And because of product co-mingling it even happens when you are buying from a “trusted” store.

Thus I’ve come to the conclusion that AMZN is the last place I want to buy anything. It doesn’t help that in my ZIP code it seems AMZN is 3 days slower from “normal” retailers like Best Buy, Target, B&H photo, etc. Last Sukkot I got a lens shipped quicker from a famous camera store in NYC even though they were closed the day I ordered.
My Simplicity Toolkit
I don’t think Wikipedia has that issue though. Pick the cutting edge in your field, in mine Wikipedia is reasonably well informed

I think this is really only an “issue” when it comes to politics and culture wars
Never is a bit much. It really depends on the language in the CLA. Are you giving them the right to change the license, etc? Some CLAs (e.g. Apache’s) are not objectionable. Some are very objectionable.
Writing a Simple Operating System from Scratch (2010) [pdf]
This isn't news and can be inferred from the direct and immediate impacts of Marijuana. It elevates blood pressure and heart rate, stimulates changes in blood hormones, causes vasoconstriction in some tissues and dilation in others.

Even video screening with quack doctors for "medical cards" routinely cautioned people with pre-existing cardiovascular issues against use.

People can debate how big these impacts are or if anyone should care, but I don't think it is reasonable to argue the null hypothesis here.