skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's because it's not investing, it's speculating at best, and usually just gambling. Investing is just another word we've lost in recent years from people trying to justify to themselves that they aren't acting like fucking idiots.

Reminds me of Carlin's bit about the softening of language.
I’m not sure any of your points counter any of what I said. The carriers near China are near China because Taiwan is near China, a carrier or even a carrier group isn’t an offensive posture against a nation, it’s too small a force. It’s provocative because there’s a provocative situation between Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, et al, and China all of whom are U.S. allies. However I don’t see any evidence the U.S. is preparing to attack China.

On the rest re: Soviet and U.S. deployments, I’m not taking a side. I’m taking issue with you repeatedly saying “a missile” in the threads, when it was much more than that. Absolutely the Cold War was a two sided war. There were no clean hands. But in the Cuban missile crisis it was much different than the situation in and around Taiwan.
Pick an Invidious instance:

https://redirect.invidious.io/

Problem solved.
The water has not been a deterrent, in my experience.
Something to look out for in recent years are cultist grassroot investors who organize on Reddit and Twitter to influence politicians to do something that is favorable to their stock and harass journalists and YouTubers who report critically and harm their stock.

r/TeslaInvestors and r/AMD_Stock are some of the worst. I can easily imagine some in the latter organizing to get RISC-V banned in the US.
Similar story with Oregon's Crater Lake.
> Minimum wage is an arbitrary construct that may have been reasonable when it was initially introduced but due to dysfunctional politics/corruption (or "lobbying") hasn't been updated to reflect the cost of living especially with regards to property prices, so making minimum wage isn't a high bar.

Irrelevant. The point is that you could set the minimum wage to zero and people would still make wages higher than that because employers have to compete for labor.

> That's why I mentioned land and not only housing. In fact in most places the land is more expensive than the building on top.

But this is really not any different -- depending on how you define it land is either a scare resource you can't get any more of at all or something that requires labor to create more of, e.g. by building sea platforms or similar.

And people don't actually need any particular amount of land in order to have shelter. You can build an arbitrarily large amount of shelter on a given piece of land by building an arbitrarily tall building. In theory there is a limit on how tall a building you could make, but in practice if we built buildings of the largest size we know how to build on the amount of land that actually exists we would have dramatically more housing than is needed for everyone.

So the limiting factor is not actually land, it's construction, which somebody has to do in order for you to have shelter.
Boomers are dying. Gen Z are welcome to take charge of these institutions and transform them as they see fit. I know some who are doing exactly that, and are much happier than the subject matter of the article.

Ultimately people are looking for meaning and purpose to their existence. There are productive ways to get there, and then there are destructive ways. Everyone needs to pick their own path.
That is documented. Since the mercurial web interface isn't very nice to use I picked a random version. sudo 1.8.6 from 2012 writes in the man page "The sudoers file must not be world-writable,".

https://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/file/SUDO_1_8_6/doc/sudoers.m...

This is also a very common behaviour for security sensitive applications to check config file permissions. Another example I remember are ssh private keys.

I might be to harsh but it is not so trustworthy they still made this error and still miss the documentation.
What do you mean by "fresh grad programs require a certain age" this seem like an easy lawsuit for age discrimination.
Wish the auto adjust brightness would track pupils and detect readability that way.
'Strong' El Niño likely to bring more snow to these states
Oh man I think this is a great idea too. Would be a great way to support some independent maker. Somebody like a level1techs.
That's not in the lawsuit, so I don't think it is a valuable addition to the conversation. If it was even implied lawyers would be eager to include it.
Do people not collaborate on feature branches?
> because this allows the slave to be less financially dependent on the master

Just a little back of the envelope economics: if everyone thinks the way you do -> labor supply doubles -> wages go down -> working two jobs is now the expectation

Similar economic side effects to having both genders in the workforce. This lifestyle only "works out" so long as most people are unwilling to do what you're doing
Total BS.

Cars and their supporting infra take up space.

Less regulations will never get rid of increased cost of individual transportation. Public transportion is the only way to push energy demand significantly.

Advising your boomer strategy "to just save" in the current era is so ignorant. This ignorance combined with the ever prospect of passive growth is imo the reason why rent extracts much more out of a life since the golden 50s.
I think there are two discussions here:

* Is using HTTPS enough on an insecure network? Should one also be using a VPN?

* Would end-users see a benefit from HTTPS on simple/plaintext sites?

> HTTP/HTTPS is likely only part of the information your computer is providing to said hostile networks.

What other non-encrypted information might a normal person's computer be communicating?

I understand that VPNs do improve privacy. Privacy is moderately important to me, but I don't think it's important enough for me to use a VPN.

There are also occasional vulnerabilities in TLS/SSL/HTTPS but... what can I really do about that? Even a VPN might establish its session with those technologies.

> wouldn't you L2VPN your traffic back to a trusted exit point regardless?

It's reasonable to expect someone technical like myself to do this, and maybe I am really just playing loose with my security. But, nobody outside of the tech community is even thinking about this. 99% of people are happy using whatever WiFi is free and aren't going to question its security.

So, using HTTPS for "simple" sites is still beneficial since you will be making your content more secure for less technical users who might be on insecure networks.
Talking to people is exactly what they're doing but the talking happens through intermediaries who spy on every interaction because they want to increase advertising revenue. The truth is that the advertising model is corrosive because it treats people like products to be bought and sold for profit. The cognitive framework imposed by social media companies is one of the main drivers of social decay and the general lack of hope about the future.

I've talked to veterans at bars and the stories they tell about how they worked and lived is entirely alien to anyone who grew up with the internet and smartphones. These people worked the same jobs for 30+ years and are now retired with pensions or disability benefits. The kind of stability that was afforded to the older generations is no longer available to anyone. No one will ever work at a single job for 30+ years and then retire with full benefits. Whatever economic and social circumstances made that possible are long gone.
I took another look and I'm very confused. Is the following correct:

Immaculata Library is your website?

You made a React-like framework to build the site?

You claim that your framework is better than React?
Most of the examples I can think of with that would not be localized.

For example, if we need massively more computing for an AI breakthrough, there's nothing requiring that to be localized. Similarly for production of any commodity that can be shipped.
Yes that sounds great. Maybe each of us could have our own dedicated self driving waymo?

As it exists now, however: public transportation is terrible, and having a personal vehicle to take you where you want safely is universally preferable.
I don't really have a reference to gauge if it's slower or faster, but I would say that it mostly just feels normal.

If I had to pick one or the other, I would say that it feels slower... maybe more like tedious since I can't actually accomplish much.
Never have rebased.

Get some updates, then merge master branch. Seems to be pretty straightforward to me.

git fetch -p --all

git pull

git merge master

(Handle merge conflicts in WE of choice.)

git push

Boom. I'll let the CI platform squash commits post-merge.

Option for gitlab if it's a small change and you don't want to run a full suite of tests.

git push -o ci.skip
git rerere only "automates" conflict solving after you already solved it. As in, it remembers previous merge resolutions, even if you undo the merge/rebase.

It is particularly useful when doing difficult merges regularly. Invariably I'll find a mistake in the merge and start over (before pushing, obviously); the second "git merge" remembers the previous resolutions so I don't have to solve all the same conflicts again.

Similar for difficult rebases that may need multiple attempts.

Git remembers resolutions across branches and commits, so in the rare case where (say) a conflict was solved during a cherry-pick, rerere will automatically apply the same resolution for a merge with the same conflict.

I think the reason it's not on by default is that the UI is confusing: when rerere solves for you, git still says there is a conflict in the file and you have to "git add" them manually. There is no way of seeing the resolutions, or even the original conflicts, and no hint that rerere fixed it for you.

You just get a bunch of files with purported conflicts, yet no ==== markers. Have fun with that one if you forget that rerere was enabled.
So while cars became popular in the 50s, it look a long time for us to basically build everything around them. As late as 1969, 48% of kids walked or biked to school, which declined to 13% in 2009^. This has been the result of a combination of real and perceived dangers, and subject to somewhat of a feedback loop as we've made roads wider and faster.

I was lucky to be able to walk to school as a kid in the 90s, and found that time to be a delicious moment of early freedom each day as kids from my neighborhood and I chose our route and cut through backyards and patches of woods to pick up other kids. I lived in a small town without wide or fast roads, so this was largely safe, but I understand why it's not possible in most suburbs today. I loved my ability to ride my bike to friends' houses and down to the town beach in the summer, without having to ask my parents for a ride.

I think I would have been a very unhappy kid growing up in the typical American suburb of today, shepherded between structured activities and constantly monitored by adults. Retreating to a private online world may be an unhealthy coping mechanism, but it makes sense.

^ http://guide.saferoutesinfo.org/introduction/the_decline_of_...
git rebase is overrated...
change my mind!
It ultimately won't tell me if the cables are actually connected inside but I have two USB testers that can read and print the information on each emark (if it's present) in the cable, which is a pretty useful thing to have when grabbing a mystery usb-c cable. I have the avhzy ct-2 and ct-3 testers, there's a bunch of other distributors of the same thing as well. The FNB48 looks like same board, different programming.

I used to be able to recommend the avhzy ones but during the chip shortage they started using some clone chips inside which don't appear to be as accurate.
There is a giant benefit to it being messy. And that is that the mess is the actual history.

Every time you do a git rebase, you are literally asking your source control system to lie about history. If you mess up, and you eventually will, you're then forced to manually figure out what the history really was despite being lied to. If you mess it up, well, good luck.

I used to work at a company where someone (we never figured out who) in another group would rebase every few weeks. We didn't find out about it until their stuff was pushed then released. The result was that features which we'd written, QAed, and released to production would simply disappear a few weeks later. With no history suggesting that it ever existed.

Have you ever been pulled off of a project to go fix a project from a month ago which has disappeared from source control? You don't know what happened, you no longer have context, you've just got complaints because your stuff no longer works.

Is your desire for a "clean history" worth potentially creating THAT disaster for other developers on your team???
I get along with zoomers. They’re the most informed and out to of touch people I talk to. Parents aren’t equipped to talk to them because parents aren’t very honest and they’re out of touch. It’s an age old story really.
S3 and SageMaker. Same region.
Owning a home and raising a family on a teacher's salary is entirely possible in many parts of the country. I literally know people who are doing it. But somehow the HN reality distortion bubble thinks that everywhere is like California. Try Iowa or Arkansas.

And I do think that we should build more housing in California, and other high cost areas. But realistically that's not going to happen soon. Zoomers who want to improve their lives today should look outside the fashionable cities.
A card sorter was a separate machine, as I recall. It had a few dozen bins that it used to sort the cards; when it was done you pulled the cards out of each bin in order and stacked them back into a single deck. If they were too out of order you might have to run the deck through the sorter more than once.
At least Gitlab does that when you push a new commit (force or not) to the branch: it'll show a list of value of the branch head commit and you can diff between them.
It's probably not a copyright violation because it's too simple, and not a trademark violation because it's for a different sector. Hence, just "bold choice".

But it's also not just a straight line: it's a thick, monochromatic straight diagonal from bottom left to top right, over a white square. It was immediately recognizable to me as another brand, and that's not what you want for your logo.
Even if Berkshire Hathaway has a market capitalization over one trillion, which I don't believe it does, $160 billion is 16% of one trillion, so it's not exactly "pocketchange for a rainy day"
the fun part: "Then under the same deal, Cupertino actually returns approximately one third of this revenue to Apple."
Pull requests after comments and revision?
I miss this from the original iPhone (or somewhere around iPhone 4) where the system would let you just turn the backlight all the way to off (though it could be hard to turn it back up if you turned off auto brightness).
Good to know the Fremen can enjoy their coffee while walking safely in sandworm territory.
The moose test is more of a slalom around an object, and tests (sort of) stability rather than braking
Don't be a crook?
Any tax needs to balance how nice and efficient it is on paper with how practical it is to collect in the real world.. Replacing both income and capital gains taxes with a single wealth tax would be theoretically most efficient and incentive-aligned, but wealth taxes are extremely difficult to administer in real life, so we don't do them and instead have income and capital gains taxes as an imperfect but easy-to-collect proxy.

It's the same thing with "buyer-reported sales taxes": nice in theory, impossible in practice (note that this isn't a hypothetical: as others have mentioned in the thread, before sales taxes were extended to internet purchases you were supposed to report internet purchases as use taxes, which approximately nobody did).
Nashville Shooter's Manifesto Released
That sounds awesome. I work almost purely in abstract ideas. I have to get my hands on so art supplies.
Out of curiosity, what do modern OSes use?
Interestingly, Plato himself was famously guarded about what he told people and he likely had esoteric teachings that he never wrote down or talked about in public (although they can be sort of derived through what aristotle and other contemporaries said about them)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato%27s_unwritten_doctrines
I prefer rebase over merge because when merging since the commits are added to HEAD, when I add new commits after merge, I find it harder to understand what is being added with the current pull request.

One thing that annoys people when rebasing is, if you need to rebase a couple of times and also you change the commit history of current branch, you might end up solving the same "conflicts". To avoid this, you can use git rerere, this basically saves your conflict resolution, and if the same conflict is encountered, it resolves it automatically: https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/gi...
You only addressed the lighthearted part of my response. I'd be much more interested in your reaction to my main point - you appear to be defining slavery as having to care for yourself. Surely you do not believe that you are owed a life of leisure do you?
Didn't you answer your own question？
Location: Louisville, KY / SF Bay Area, CA

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes

Email: davidmnoll@gmail.com

Resume: https://davidmnoll.github.io/assets/DavidNoll-Resume-9d9913c...
Github: https://github.com/davidmnoll

Experienced full stack developer, looking for position in collaborative culture with a strong team.

Previously lead engineer at NYC start-up. Led remote team of 3 other developers. Set up CI/CD pipeline & testing. Worked on problems around scaling, testing, maintainability, security as well as new feature delivery.
FYI for HDMI the licensing group actually forbids doing this, iirc. Go figure.
These numbers are helpful in understanding the odds, but alot will depend on the job offer. Me personally if I was looking at working at a startup would basically optimize for job title that has a reasonable chance of being real. for instance, if you can be the CTO of a seed round that looks like it can raise a a series A then maybe that's better than a coding role at a series C.
What documentation did you use to decode hd radio protocol? From what I recall, the formats were all closed in some capacity. Did you reverse engineer it?
Let's just review all the various configurations of a "standard" USB-C cable (usb-c is really just the connector pinout).

Data channel: yes / no

PD support: yes / no

USB version: 2.0, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2

Amperage: 3 amp, 5 amp, 6+ amp

48+ possible varieties of "standard" USB-C cable and no practical way to determine what you have without plugging it in.

What a great "standard"!
I think this is a strawman. Twitter is not attacked for prohibiting doxxes, right?
Are there any video editing software that take advantage of ffmpeg? I once thought about making something to draw geometry through SVG and use ffmpeg then, or maybe add some UI or whatever, or just to add text, but I never started.

Avidemux feels like it's a bit that.

Since ffmpeg internals are quite raw and not written to be accessed through a GUI, any video editor based on it would probably be quite clunky and weird and hard to maintain.

Maybe an editor that use modules that just build some kind of preview with an command explainer, or some pipeline viewer.

ffmpeg is quite powerful, but it's a bit stuck because it only works with a command line, which is fine, but I guess it somehow prevents it from being used by some people.

I've already written a python script to take a random amount of clips, and build a mosaic with the xstack filter. It was not easy.
Llama 2 is still the most transparent and open source model.
You can get this information from the "System Information" app in macOS as well. (At least, that's what it's called in Ventura...)

It should be under Hardware -> Power, in the section titled "AC Charger Information".

You should also be able to see connected USB-C cable capacity under Hardware -> USB. For example, mine says the following:

USB 3.1 Bus:

Host Controller Driver: AppleT8112USBXHCI

USB3.0 Hub:

Product ID: 0x0813
Vendor ID: 0x2109 (VIA Labs, Inc.)
Version: 90.11
Speed: Up to 5 Gb/s
Manufacturer: VIA Labs, Inc.
Location ID: 0x01200000 / 2
Current Available (mA): 900
Current Required (mA): 0
Extra Operating Current (mA): 0

USB2.0 Hub:

Product ID: 0x2813
Vendor ID: 0x2109 (VIA Labs, Inc.)
Version: 90.11
Speed: Up to 480 Mb/s
Manufacturer: VIA Labs, Inc.
Location ID: 0x01100000 / 1
Current Available (mA): 500
Current Required (mA): 0
Extra Operating Current (mA): 0
Where there is demand, there is supply. Price, that is not shaped or regulated by central authority, evolves with possibilities.

Why would anyone throw trash on street, with full of bins? Mandate usualy change human behavior in opposite direction.
I don't see anything in the article backing the big claim in the title. The paragraph below is about alleged fairness, not efficiency.

'These hidden costs can be interconnected. Laborde offered the example of cacao—the key ingredient in chocolate. Cacao is mostly grown in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, where farmers are often paid a pittance for their crops. That cacao is mostly eaten by people in high-income countries, particularly in Europe, and usually in the form of sugar-laden chocolate bars. If people in Europe ate a little less chocolate but paid more for a fairer and higher-quality product, that could help reduce health impacts in Europe while directing more money toward farmers in West Africa, Laborde says.'
One of the main arguments will be that Google doesn't make it easy enough to sideload apps, purposefully, adding friction as a dark pattern.
> Forcing Rust into a domain where a GC'd language is more than enough offers absolutely zero advantages (yes, you'll have no memory safety issues, but neither you would have had you used Python or Java or Go or whatever), and it's the kind of obnoxious overzealousness that I'm denouncing.

It is refreshing to see that other people share this point of view. I guess we are not disagreeing after all.
Not nearly as badly.

A badly done merge can indeed ruin code. But you'll always have the versions that went into the merge, and the merge itself. Your history has all of the information to recreate exactly what happened, find what changed, and then figure out how to fix it.

A badly done rebase not only ruins your work, it also removes from the branch any record of your work having been done. Unless you can find the right stray old commit which is not yet cleaned up, there is no choice but to start doing it again from scratch.
Haven't read the article yet.
Whenever I'm working on a feature branch, I always tend to "merge master into the feature branch".
The effect of this obviously being that I want to have the latest changes incorporated into my work to avoid conflicts and/or to proceed with my own feature work.
This has always worked well for me and never failed me.

If I understand what rebase does correctly, it just adds all my commits in my remote feature branch to the HEAD of the branch that's being rebased onto. That's why after doing it and finishing it, one needs to do a push force because the head of the remote feature branch would diverge.
But... Why? How is this better or different than just merging master into the branch? Gitlab for example and Intellij show all the branch changes and commits with their hashes so it all can be cherry picked or reverted if needed quite easily...

Has anybody who used to "merge master into" and now uses rebase that has a much different view on it being better?