skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We'll all be better off by shifting to a borderless paradigm. Yandex is just a canary in the coal mine.
I managed to keep it below 45% without any real thought for inputs greater than 100 keystrokes. The biggest problem humans have with randomness is that they underestimate the possibility of long runs (they are rare but not that rare).
My son is 7 and nonverbal, as in your example, and I share much the same problem with the widening of the definition of autism. My partner - a successful academic - is also autistic, in the manner of your other examples.

As with any term that has become too wide to be useful, it needs subdividing. There used to be autism and aspergers, high functioning autism and low functioning autism, etc. Each classification had its problems but the general idea wasn't wrong: there has to be a term for people who need support and can't function without it, to differentiate between them and the high flyers (or even just "getting by OK") and to my mind "high needs autism" is the right term.

The definitions of autism as I understand them are.. interesting. The reason a highly successful person can be diagnosed is because the diagnostic criteria - usually the triad of impairments - specify a person must have difficulties but tend not to describe a way of categorising the level of those difficulties.

By way of example, I might have difficulty knowing what to say to a person (social interaction) in an unfamiliar setting (social imagination) which could manifest itself as me awkwardly interacting in a way that isn't called for, but which is recognised as social awkwardness. Some autistic people may freeze - sometimes in terror - and simply stop responding while they try to work out what to do. Imagine how it feels to be lost for words, and then some. To my knowledge, both examples above fulfil the criteria because they're both social difficulties.

I'd recommend reading more about the diagnostic criteria and interrogating the range of problems people can face. To me, the dividing line is independence. I'd suggest starting there in your thinking, but not forgetting that autism can also be a hidden disability insofar AW support needs might be invisible to the people around.
What do you mean? Whats wrong with them?
They should just give up and toss it out.
Makesure v0.9.21 – What's New?
I don't see any country names on the map. When I type 'israel' into the search bar I get the same chinese characters that are being shown under Jerusalem (耶路撒冷) -- I don't ready or speak any chinese

--

If I play with the zoom I see many small countries without labels (no idea what they say) -- cyprus, israel, and lebenon included
> Except that of you're only showing it once that means you're tracking me to know I'm a repeat visitor

It is arguably tracking required for the functioning of the site which is a clear exception to the ban.
Pharma is not insurance.
It's clearly speech. Were the content of their speech different, there would be no ban. Or is there some means of behaving where they could relay that message to their governmental twitter account without a block?
The Finals uses AI text-to-speech because it can produce lines 'in hours'
absolute necessity of selecting the right SEO expert. We were at the crossroads of a significant business decision, and the direction we took was immensely influenced by our SEO insights. This experience solidified one fact: the evolving landscape of SEO is undeniable in its importance to modern businesses.
Thank you for the suggestion! I will add that.
You are correct. Is even worse than that: they can be used to make tanks, rockets or even sex toys. They shall be banned. /s
Over 80% has checked that their DNA can be used for these kind of cases. So what is the problem, except for people not reading or caring?
The other ruling in this case is a bit concerning. The judge ruled that LinkedIn can't make profiles public by default.

1. I hate that LinkedIn ever makes me log in to see a profile and

2. It's pretty much the purpose of LinkedIn to share your information publicly

The idea that you have to obtain explicit consent to do what your website advertises itself to do is idiocy.

If I make a website called 'publishmypii.com' is a German court going to force me to add a click through agreement that says I will publish user's PII? Total nonsense.
Where do your two options come from, and what makes you think there couldn't be an alternative?

Also, what do your alternatives have to do with the question whether it's better or not for the error message to be localized?

And why are error codes supposed to be 32bits long in the first place?
What? You mean, this whole time my teenage vitriol and emoji laden angst did nothing?!
> The most antisemitism lately in my twitter feed comes from the academia and leftist intellectuals.

I'm curious what you're defining as antisemitic here. I've seen a lot of claims that being anti-Israeli-government is equivalent to antisemitism, but this is objectively not the case.
The question strikes me as odd. I can't imagine why one would split an API across separate isolated compute nodes. I've used isolated functions in the context of "message orchestration" scenarios, but I'd never do that for an API.
Absolutely, I am happy to give back to society if AI overlords do the same - make models and datasets opensource.

Kinda hypocritical to infringe on copyright while expecting protection themselves
Of course it should. In europe tracking is supposed to be Opt-In so enabling by default is exactly how it should work.
Why does there seem to be zero interest in changing that? All I see is hope the EU would do something on one side and mockery of China and Russia for doing exactly the same.
Typical gov. Have a money burning problem? Let's create yet another org to solve it.
Unlike in certain Western countries where we have systems and processes in place to ensure that, I don't know, incompetent progeny do not become senior staffers in the White House.
A campaign rally is not official business of his office.
Yes. Without batching, every weight is only used once per token. On discrete GPUs, you generally need around ~20 flops/byte of memory bandwidth to be compute bound. I don't know where APUs are in that regard, but probably not entirely different. Memory bandwidth divided by model size is more or less the token rate you should expect to get from a good LLM inference implementation.
That’s setting a cookie/local storage that can be used purely client side to determine whether to show the message or not. No tracking required because the server never has to see or store this.
You think that's the only module they dropped?

They took away cgi… which I was of course using.

And crypt.

They don't care about breaking things. People would not migrate to python4 so they just break everything in python3 :D
You say you don't play online games and bought the controller for a fighting game so how can you tell how much of a cheat it is? The parent comment said it has anti-recoil which is a huge advantage in FPS games.
> The author is just describing what people of all kinds do. Yes, there are very silly beliefs which sometimes seduce educated elites. But that just makes them like everybody else.

The idea that some of these beliefs are popular specifically because you have to be rich to afford them was a new insight to me when I first heard it. Maybe I should've come up with it myself from first principles, but I didn't.
It’s not the first time I’ve seen this kind of comment on HN lately, including ‘anti-woke’ sentiments.
HP Officejet Pro 8600 is one of the known printers. It has a modern matte look and a 3.4-inch touchscreen. It provides many features to the user, like air print capabilities, simplifying and up-leveling the printing experience. But, with all these features, printers also face some of the error. One of the common errors seen in an HP Officejet Pro is a Wi-Fi connectivity error. With a few simple methods, you can easily resolve the HP Officejet Pro 8600 connection to Wi-Fi error.
> for a lot of people, "perceived willingness" is just too high concept

But the smear merchants couldn't take the risk. I agree, Stallman shouldn't have been commenting on it - as the face of free software, he needs to think carefully about appearances, regardless of being technically correct.

Where we disagree is in presenting journalists repeating the smears as merely confused. They can write 1000+ word articles about the statement, but can't spend more than one word quoting the statement itself?
> Not true. Every business has freedom to choose its customers.

In America yes. In Europe no, you can't project US law here.

For example the "We don't bake cakes for gay couples" is absolutely not ok here either.
A Florida school district banned cellphones
Absolutely true, but also: Usually, your business transactions happen in a business context, which happens to be in a microservice.
It can be a sign of bad design if you happen to have a lot of those transactional problems.

You will have distributed transactions with a distributed microservice setup, but most transactions will still be be contained within a single microservice (and thus be atomic and not distributed).
I disagree but only in part.

> I agree with you that having a service 100% free with 0 compromise is not possible, well, it is possible but someone is paying somewhere (see below)

> I disagree that the European union is throwing rules that makes no sense. Privacy should be the default, and if your business is not viable without tracking, perhaps it should not exist.

here is 2 examples of free services I am using daily :

signal : https://moneymodels.org/business-models/how-does-signal-make... (I donated)

mastodon : backed by https://sdf.org/ (I have not donated but wish to do so)

I believe that a more "socialist" approach is possible (pay if you can model so everyone can use the service regardless of their income) It will not scale to the size of facebook, but irc, mastodon and matrix.org already shows that federation works (not without pain).

The startup ecosystem based on advertising money may suffer, but I think this just lead to a better internet in the long run.
Don't let one bad action color your feelings about a person. There are plenty more.

I'll even help with a starting point:
https://daringfireball.net/2019/09/richard_stallmans_disgrac...

I once brought up RMS, in relation to a project a friend was working on, on misc@google, when I worked at Google in my 20s. This was circa 2005 or 2006 maybe. Within minutes I was called out by female engineers for promoting someone I'd come to learn was well known to be pretty sexist. That was about 20 years ago and the details of events shared are lost to me now but the sting of promoting a project he was on (and was later removed from) is still there.
Surely British case law isn’t at all lacking surprising court decisions
i started pressing and eventually it showed 0%.
At this moment i knew i beat the machine because i was free to stop.
There is part of free will in the amount of data you wanna give too :)
we need more of this!
Big question is does police currently have enough funding for those main tasks? If not defunding them by taking money from them only makes situation even worse.

Or do you actually need more funding to spend on the other stuff? Which could in best case over some years decrease overall costs for society.
The obvious alternative explanations?? Like they just randomly and accidentally decided to erase an entire state? Particularly an extremely contested state? Give me a break - you’re really not making a good argument.
I think there's a fundamental difference between information passed in confidence for a specific purpose and information made publically available with an intended range of purposes. I do not believe that the latter is morally protected from unintended use.
This talks about foreign countries applying & enforcing your countries court orders (within EU). I don't think it can be stretched to include case law in your new case.

You could try that in court since the base gdpr is the same, but EU law implementations still differ.
The problem is that people doing data science are not developers, so instead of just using whatever is there they are reinventing a terrible version of package management.
Most licence terms already include a term to change the terms. So technically once you buy it, install it, and agree to it, you are also agreeing the terms may change. They probably also have arbitration clauses you are agreeing to so you can't directly sue them either.
The American insurance model is stupid and needs to go away, regardless of my DNA.
Parent post said "science/health", nothing about preventing crime or jailing more people
… and once it’s used by multiple sites to uniquely identify you, it becomes a tracking cookie in (most of) the laws on the books.

The law judges intent as well as technology.
Weird, my view of history is that most progress in philosophy, arts, science, engineering, etc has come from aristocracy members who had the means to pursue something other than working for their next meal. That the aristocracy also spent their time exploiting the poor masses doesn't change that.
DNT is both common practice and a documented standard; the law will take both these into account in judging it vs `X-Tracking-Is-Stupid`.
I mean, depends on use case right? Certainly for travel and navigation purposes I very much want to know when I'm about to leave a country :-). For any economical or political review as well, country birders are extremely relevant data.

There certainly are geology and other scientific endeavours which perhaps don't care too much for countries, but even they probably need them when they interface with regular humans (I.e. This lake is in such and such country, this volcano is about to explode over there, etc)
> were extremely rude and unprofessional shouting at us... giving no directions or information to the hundreds of people affected... they left us stranded in the terminal

First time dealing with Turkish port authorities? They do this to their own people. Try getting a car on a boat in Alanya. You will go on a mad goose paper chase: Person A will make you wait half an hour in their queue (with mandatory coffee breaks), to then tell you that you need a paper from person B. Person B is nowhere to be found, or on their coffee break, but person C says they might be in building X. No one in building X has ever heard of person B, and who the hell are you anyway for asking, go back to the terminal. Meanwhile your car is blocking other cars from leaving the boat, and there's nothing you can do because Person D needs to see that paper before you move it. People are getting stressed. An angry traveller knows person B from the village, and goes into Building X and drags him into the street so that he can give you your damn paper, but person B doesn't know what you're talking about and sends you back to person A. Person A is pissed off, and writes something on a piece of paper, and sends you to Person C. Person C, reads the paper, writes something else on the paper, and tells you to give it to Person A. Person A reads the scrap of paper, and then writes nothing but your number plate on a square piece of paper, and tells you to give it to person D, who barely glances at it and lets you go to your car.

Moral: next time, have your number plate scrawled lazily on a postit note and wave it vaguely at the guy at the fence, like everyone else does to bypass the bureaucratic hell that is the turkish port authority.
to show that a real free will is to stop right when you beat it :)
This changed my mind a little bit because I went through this as a kid:

> Stallman was unpopular not because he was some sort of a monster harassing women, but because he was seen as unattractive, clueless, and bizarre.

So that's extremely plausible from my perspective. Probably further along the spectrum than me.
This is why I've moved away from arguing with people on the internet, because there are too many people out there today who are absolutely deranged and will make it literally their life's mission to stalk you through every means at their disposal.

Also - mostly thanks to discord - it's trivial to summon an army of kids who are under the age of criminal responsibility who will do almost anything (online) if you kick them a few robux.
University work. Pretty much what apple promote it for.
If they didnt include a black person, wouldnt that also be false image because not all people in tech are white?

Im sure you would be just aa upset in that case, right?
It's a bit of a question about what you define the term "JVM" as. For many people it just means the thing which runs bytecode java was compiled to, in which case the Android runtime (ART) is a JVM (it has AOT, JIT and can run bytecode prodced from Java if done so in the right way).

But a more nit-picky/correct definition would expect the JVM to follow various specs (e.g. expect the bytecode the have exact the same format, features etc. as the one you find in a classical java application) and have various features which do not apply to the ART at all.

Or in other words, people which have nothing to do with java might call the ART a JVM in a generic way but people which do might be for good reason very insistent that this isn't the case. (Also Google lawyer will be VERY insistent it's no a JVM.)
I have elsewhere defended 'whataboutism' as just another way of asking a person to answer for moral hypocrisy.

Some people clearly want to walk their dogs without leashes. Some people want all dogs leashed. Now, what's the moral standard at work? How do you determine the level of danger?

If you want to constrain people, limit their ability to lives their lives as they wish, you need to have an answer you can defend without bias or prejudice. That you don't like unleashed dogs cannot be grounds for limiting another; there has to be more than your mere preference.

To separate out people disguising their irrational fear from a genuine moral position, one needs to establish that moral position. 'Whatabout' here applies exactly, in moral philosophy its called casuistry: arguing from cases.

So if your moral position is that at a certain level of risk, one must put up signs and start socially policing people -- then ok, let's hear it: what level of risk? what's the principle at work here? (Or does your mind leap to imagined danger in one case, but not another: are you a bigot?).

My view is that I want to live in a society much more tolerant to risk for the sake of avoiding social policing. I dont want to go to parks where people are 'watching out for rule breakers'.

You, presumably, want to live in that society? This is the question.

If you do, so be it. I am not taking a stand against leash laws one way or another. I'm taking issue with a particular mechanism of enforcement of social rules by which emotional busy-bodies go around clutching their pearls and calling the police.

The issue of dog leashes is just one trivial example of this general phenomenon -- and it is this that I am talking about. I have no care whatsoever about what the law should be in the matters of dog leashing.

I gather people in this thread are unable or unwilling to engage in the argument I am making which is at one level of abstraction above the issue around dog leads.
They are slaves to the machine.
It does because it's the low-end MBP with the base M chip. The 14" M3 has a fan too.
Like others said, I absolutely feel this post. I don’t think I can say any other post I’ve ever read feels this relatable. Every one of his posts is both accurate and a depressing assessment of the overwhelming incompetence in this industry.

> I literally can't remember what was said, there was some Agile bullshit about doing a discovery piece, then it just never happened.

I know he doesn’t work the same place I did but damn, it sure feels like it.
Most screw heads are formed in a cold header. If you've never seen one running, you'd think it was magic.

Wire goes in one side, and using a surprisingly simple and old (WWII era) machine made with some heavy castings, plain bearings, oily camshafts, and the magic of tool steel, the wire is incrementally upset, extruded, formed, punched, and thread rolled. Screws roll out the other side at an astonishing rate - hundreds per minute.

I can't share video of my customer's machine running, but here's one from Youtube:

https://youtu.be/WoN2KKfbzLA?si=iN42q6n1wBkoJ-gS&t=187

I imagine that many screws on spacecraft use CNC-cut machine screw threads, and have significant QC measures in place, but I'd be unsurprised if they had cold-formed Torx or hex heads.
Bingo. Big companies won’t be impacted.
No, a cookie with default settings attached to https://example.com saying "previous_visitor=true" does not provide any information whatsoever to any sites other than https://example.com.

There are various techniques to place "cookies" (sometimes not technically cookies) that can be correlated by multiple websites working together, but the website has to go out of their way to proactively do that, this is not something that gets enabled by simply placing a standard non-personalized cookie.
Python removed distutils… basically now there is no official way to install things.
China publishes an official political map each year, which the companies must treat as canon. They also swapped a contested half-Russian island to being fully China. I think it’s a way to assert some politics at a lower volume.

I can’t say for sure this is that, but I can say for sure that there is tremendous political power in cartography and the simplest act of choosing the label levels for placenames. This move has been done countless times before so I wouldn’t be surprised at all if it’s intentional.
> we shouldn't be thinking about our actions and others and how they impact that world?

Yeah they're trying pretty hard to discourage that
What's the usage pattern like? Is all of the VRAM used extensively in AI workloads, or one could hope to augment things a bit with system RAM with little performance impact?
Dude, I am not sure you will still read this.
Viki has changed: https://support.viki.com/hc/en-us/articles/17924295071251-Su...

What a clusterfuck. This may be a better option now: https://www.iq.com/
Personally, you pay for a thing that you can't modify in any way and it ends up being not yours.

I don't trust the software either.
Just in case people don't want to follow the threads, here's Stallman on statutory rape in 2006:

https://www.stallman.org/archives/2006-may-aug.html#05%20Jun...

(He himself recanted the statement years later but he had to be convinced by victims that victimization is a problem.)
I'm not sure in which part of Europe you live, but in some parts these are part of the high-school and university curriculum (civics classes). Here is a refresher:

> # Freedom
> Freedom of movement gives citizens the right to move and reside freely within the Union. *Individual freedoms such as respect for private life, freedom of thought*, religion, assembly, expression and information are protected by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
>
>[..]
>
> # Human rights
> Human rights are protected by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. These cover the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, *the right to the protection of your personal data, and the right to get access to justice*.

(excerpt, emphasis mine based on current context, original: https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-histor...)

These basic rights (considered parts of the so called European values) are often infringed by US companies employing extensive surveillance.

Hope I could help.

t. Eastern European assuming the desire for privacy is a universal European value, not only thought in school curriculum.
And given the aparent tolerance shown towards the one in the ME, its easy for them to claim double standards when people complain about treatment of e.g. the Uygurs. Because, well, there are.