skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can't speak for anyone else, of course, but I'm absolutely certain that I'm an introvert, and that I get a lot of my socialization online, and almost always have even when friends have been plentiful and local - in college, for instance, when my three roommates were my friends, I still spent a fair amount of time talking online.

I think - and again, my experience, just another anecdote to throw in the bucket - that introverts like communicating online because we don't run out of gas as quickly, because there is less focus on immediate responses. We can step back, we can take a few minutes - or days! - to think before we reply. If we want to, we can be much more in-depth, take the time to analyze our own feelings and those of the others in the conversation.

Online, there's no rush to do your part in a conversation while a loud bar is overwhelming your ability to even hear the other party.

Having said that, I'm not so introverted that I don't need face-to-face time with friends. My D&D group hasn't met since August, and one of the players can't make it to a party we're hosting this weekend, and it bums me the fuck out!

edit: I just noticed you said "complete strangers". This isn't socializing for me; my online socializing is in Slack & Discord, with people I've known for years & decades - some of whom I first met online, some of whom I first met in real life, some of whom I met online first and then in real life (and attended the wedding of!), and some of whom I've never met IRL and may never meet.
Right now google allows the SPF domain, and/or the DKIM signing domain to be different than the From domain, not just a subdomain but an entire different domain. From an ESP perspective, will this drop shared SPF(Return-Path) domains? I'm assuming DKIM has to match, just not sure about the return-path side. It's a bit vague in the support article.
Winging it with the new backcountry barnstormers
This is a ridiculous proposal, and obviously not doable. Such a law can't be written in a way that complies with First Amendment protections and the vagueness doctrine.

It's a silly thing to want anyway. What matters is whether the content is legal or not; the tool used is irrelevant. Centuries ago some authoritarians raised similar concerns over printing presses.

And copyright is an entirely separate issue.
Is there a public git repo available somewhere that represents a Kart repository?

Are the raw files in the working repository GeoPackages? How is it tracking the changes made inside the geopackages? What happens if it's replaced with an updated copy of the geopackage the was edited via some other application? How does it diff the changes?
RTO was an attempt to voluntarily cut headcount.
https://archive.ph/s19VX
> What's the difference

Between a pattern or course of behavior and the person carrying out the behavior? I would say that someone's public actions and remarks are not subject to therapist-patient privilege and that it is completely acceptable and defensible to look at a pattern of behavior and its dicrete component actions and derive conclusions for that based on similar and previously observed behavior from other anonymized and representative patients via case studies and clinical observations.
8bitdo have fantastic controllers imo. I got a snes style controller for some of the switch games that are on its emulator, it fits very well.
You can simply put two buttons on the email, one for unsubscribe, one for re-subscribe. If they unsub by accident they can simply pull the last email and re-sub. It's not rocket science.
That's the correct pronunciation, yup
For $85, the Orange Pi 5 supports 8K hardware video encoding (H265/H264) via gstreamer, and that's just what I'm aware of. I'm sure there are other single-board computers with similar (or better) features.

Unless you're dependent on the Raspberry Pi HAT ecosystem or you're not particularly technical, it's worth considering the alternatives.
You see it every day -- in the mirror. It shows that a kilogram of matter can be arranged into a generally intelligent configuration. Assuming that there's nothing fundamentally special about the physics of the human brain, I see no reason why a functionally similar arrangement cannot be made out of silicon and software.
It's a decent low energy interaction. I can write this message and then disappear for the next three days, no big deal. I don't need to worry about keeping up my energy or caring about the result of my addition. It's near zero stakes.
is this schmidhuber's alt? sure they existed before AlexNet was where it really took off. just look at the number of citations. right paper, right time. CNNs were uniquely suited to the hardware at the time. because of their efficiency due to symmetry and suitability to GPGPU computing. not because of their history.
Did you even try clicking on the account in the first post? Account suspended.

I don’t see how you think this is wrong.
Yeah I didn't mean a NUC from Intel (who have just stopped making them anyway). I meant the Beelink kind of mini-PC or indeed some used systems which is exactly what I use, and generalised them under the term NUC. That was not very clear.
You could make your own with an ESP32 wired to two buttons, then you can customize it exactly as you need it. It shouldn't be too difficult (famous last words, I know) if you use one of the BT HID libraries like https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/latest/esp32/....
I’m quite surprised it’s dropped “only” by 55%.

Musk made the offer just before a big drop in valuation of tech companies. Even if Twitter revenue remained stable it probably wouldn’t be worth $44B Musk paid.

With a drop in usage, drop in ads, controversy around the bots, misinformation, failure of Twitter Blue, I would expect that the actual value is quite below the said $19B.

Maybe the cost saving measures partially offset the drop in revenue? They crippled functionality for guest users quite a lot (I’m not logged in on my work laptop and I can’t see quote tweets nor replies), their workforce is 5x smaller, it seems their costs are way lower than before.
You bring up a vaid case. People farming pennies could be an issue, but on the other hand, farming pennies is a more noble cause, and one that ostensibly seems far easier to catch. I'd rather do a lookup to find the outliers who are harvesting pennies than to try and cat-and-mouse spammers who are masquerading as legitimate senders.
Looks clean and straightforward. Search on top, adds some value as I just searched artificial intelligence and I got something relevant back.

Good job
> Since the social media service could change the hash too,

This might be a legit use case for PGP and signing your posts with your private key
A casual check says the quoted text is from Huxley's Crome Yellow (https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1999/1999-h/1999-h.htm) and that the speaker is a character known only as Mr. Scogan, which some suggest is an analogue of Bertrand Russell.
Took Elon 17 years to get Tesla profitable... why do you think he'd give up in a year?

The largest problem with businesses these days is the "we must make profit next quarter" mindset and the "I hope he fails" is either that - or a pocket dislike of free speech. Each option is questionable in it's own right.

I hope Elon succeeds. Not because I agree with everything he says or does but because I value free speech.

“I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it” -Voltaire
> Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that the Snapdragon X Elite's single-core performance can rival the best of current offerings from Intel, AMD, and Apple.

The word "laptop" is missing from this sentence.

And since laptops have soldered cpus i think this would not help the adoption of an exotic archirecture with no software support. (Supports DirectX and OpenGL - he just forgot to mention the numbers).

I would love to see computers other than x86, but, at the moment, they are limited to routers, laptops and things like Raspberry or Banana Pi.
> You're misremembering. Matrox cards were also terribly slow in DOS and anything adjacent to 3D

Nope, it was the Parhelia released in 2002 - so somewhat later than the hardware you're considering. The Parhelia was what I was thinking of, with a truly insane number of transistors: 80 million! ("something like" was bearing quite a lot of weight in my first comment :D ). However it was only in the same ballpark, not actually faster that the Geforce 4 Ti or the Radeon 8500, and it was more expensive, so failed in the market.

The relevant anandtech review: https://www.anandtech.com/show/936 (post 936, vs this week's Qualcomm which is post 21112 :D )
> You can buy a pretty nice house in a nice neighborhood in Detroit for under $150,000 and a decent one for $75,000.

That’s probably under cost of construction, though, right? Maybe this is just way cheaper in the US than here, somehow, but current all-in cost of construction in Ireland for a one-off house is on the order of 2500eur/sqm, so about 250k eur for a house this size.
Imo almost every "open source" VC-backed startup is actually "open core" (including us.) I'm yet to see a startup that doesn't have a significant closed-source or restrictively-licensed component.

My philosophy for both creating & consuming OSS: the core needs to (a) have an OSI-approved license (read: no BSL, SSPL), (b) needs to be useful without the closed source component, and (c) needs to be easy to run without the closed source component. Otherwise, see [1]. I also avoid AGPL, even though it is OSI-approved.

TC has a good take on the economics of fully open source companies [2].

[1] https://openwashing.org/

[2] https://techcrunch.com/2014/02/13/please-dont-tell-me-you-wa...
Have a link to github? Would be fun to try with mine.
I've heard from other Dads that having a kid vastly improved their time management skills and they only realized after how much time they were leaving unused before. Even with kids, the over-under shakes out better for them.

May be a muscle you train, so to speak.
Even on mobile? I sincerely hope when I play a YouTube video on my iPhone it's using the built-in decoder hardware rather than churning through what may as well be Google's proprietary codec on the CPU but I guess I have no way of knowing.
The Beaglebone people put out new ones, but the volumes were so dismal that they simply weren't worth it.

One engineering problem is that the power envelope is kind of tight. While the RPi simply will not work with 5V@500mA, the BBB does. If you bump the frequency, your power supply needs shoot up and you start needing heat sinks.

It really feels like the Beaglebone Black got the engineering aspects correct. Shame that even hackers are suceptible to marketing.

At this point, being able to use the Beaglbone Black is practically a superpower for me as an engineer. I can buy it. My end customers can buy it. It's real Linux so my end customer can bang on it as required. It's documented, so I can generate the embedded drivers I need and document them.

I suspect that with the industrial etherenet built in, the BeaglePlay is about to take on some of that character.
Neat. I usually use wordreference.com, but forvo.com has many more accents and some phrases.

Just today I noticed how different the US and British pronunciations of Lieutenant are. The British one has an f sound in it, somehow.

https://forvo.com/search/lieutenant/
Distilling common (or if you will "tribal") design knowledge into pattern languages has fallen a bit out of fashion in the 20 years since this article has been published. I've searched for similar resources a while ago, and I found only a few other attempts at this subject at all.

The earliest was published 1996 in the second volume of "Pattern Languages of Program Design": A Pattern Language for an Essay-Based Website by Robert Orenstein. An early draft of it is only reachable via archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/19961227102428/http://www.anamor...

Then there was "A First Approach To Design Web Sites By Using Patterns" published 2002: https://hillside.net/vikingplop/vikingplop2002/VikingPLoP200...

Also in 2002 there was a book "The design of sites", which even saw an updated second edition in 2007, but had a clear focus on e-commerce and corporate websites.

The submitted resource, Mark Irons' pattern language, was published in 2003.

And then, 17 years after that, an unfinished (maybe still in progress?) attempt in 2020: A Web Pattern Language: https://kmcgillivray.github.io/a-web-pattern-language/

I think one problem is that personal websites are to some extent the training ground of the web. The stakes and incentives are different than for your run-of-the-mill boring corporate website. There are more design outliers and more experimentation, which probably makes it harder to distill patterns out of it. Although I would love to read through a comprehensive pattern language that reflects the more personal and non-commercial corners of the web of today.
Kids 7, 5, 3, being honest I never squared that circle. All I can say is, they're not toddlers for that long in the grand scheme of things.

I think a lot depends on how supportive your partner and care network can be, and your financial circumstances.

Personally I struggled a lot, we live away from family and my partner also works. In the end I had to accept that you only really have their adoration and attention for a limited amount of time, I put most of my projects and hobbies on hold, scaled back work a bit, gave them all the attention I could and made the most of whatever downtime available to maintain sanity. A lot of things just had to give.
I can't recall any tech rebrands (or general rebrands) that people took seriously or were felt affirmatively or excitedly positive about. At best, people react with ambivalence.
Because you can name your company anything you want.

(as long as it isn't already trademarked, anyway)
I don't think that raising the entrance fee will boost quality. I would say, if you find someone that is making content you think is quality find a way to directly support them. A monthly payment goes a long way to supporting a creator.

* Having an ads option means being a content producer can be free. There is no minimum fee for posts to act as a basic spam filter.

* The economies of who gets paid to generate content is mostly based on who generates the most views. This is only loosely associated with quality. If you look deeply, this is more complicated than what I stated is essentially true.

* There is currently enough money being sent to content creators to sustain quality content. I don't see why increasing the money will increase quality, as sufficient funds for quality are already present.
Lots of web apps for L-Systems:

https://www.google.com/search?q=l-systems+generator
Non-wheelchair-bound, neurotypical people happily use those stalls too because it's not an actual rule (at least anywhere I've ever been). At best, if an actual wheelchair-bound person shows up in line you let them use it first because that's courteous. It's also often used by people with small kids because it affords room for them to go in there with the kids to make sure they don't make a mess or help them clean themselves (if they aren't quite potty trained yet).

Neurotypical people are as aware as anyone else that many (if not most) rules are arbitrary and not all rules make sense and that not all people insisting a rule exists are worth listening to.
It reminds me of the iMpulse controller I got on Kickstarter almost a decade ago, but at least this one has a chance of being decent considering 8bitdo's history.

https://www.androidpolice.com/2013/08/30/impulse-bluetooth-c...
That's probably exactly what happened. My time became more valuable and so I prioritized. I also got really good at getting things done in bursts.
as a native english speaker, this helps with words like Schenectady too.
He'd have to make a package, make the connections solid, etc etc. A fun project but a project onto its own self.
Was that his 4D chess plan all along?
> Now Apple is setting the standard for laptop performance,

Too bad it doesn't run Windows. Sincerely, the purchasing department. /s
Incus 0.2 adds NVMe, NixOS images and more
Looks like the LXD fork is starting to add some new features of its own on top of just catching up with what Canonical is doing.
What do you mean with correlation and orthogonality? Like with signal processing, you might calculate the cross-correlation of two signals, and it basically tells you at each possible shifted value, to what extent does one signal project onto the other (so what's their dot product). Orthogonality is not invariant under permuting/shifting entries in just one of the vectors, obviously (e.g. in your standard 2-d arrows space, x-hat is orthogonal to y-hat but not x-hat).

Linear algebra studies linearity, not (just) orthogonality. Orthogonality requires an inner product, and there isn't a canonical one on a linear structure, nor is there any one on e.g. spaces over finite fields. Mathematics, like programming, has an interface segregation principle. By writing implementations to a more minimal interface, we can reuse them for e.g. modules or finite spaces. It also makes it clear that questions like "are these orthogonal" depend on "what's the product", which can be useful to make sense of e.g. Hermite polynomials, where you use a weighted inner product.
> Every single husband I've met

Well, you're statistically less likely to meet the introverted ones :)
As a counterpoint, with our two older kids (we have a baby too), I felt like my time was most drained during the 0-6 months stage. After that we got into good routines with them sleeping for 12 hours at night, and that brought back most of my most precious time.

My oldest is 5, and we're just now reaching the point where he's wanting to stay up later into our adult time, but in my experience there are a lot of comfortable years that were better than the immobile stage.
Delaware Tax Office. No joke.

I'm not sure what systems they have in place there. I was telling my co-founder about my experience with them just yesterday, and my experiences have taken place over about 2-3 years, but I've had no contact with them in probably 4-5 years.

Every call, the call center people were knowledgeable, friendly, helpful. It was a pleasure to call them (which is not what I expected at all).

I remember I had a call with them, and had to contact Razer directly afterwards because they shipped me 3 faulty computers (out of 4 ordered). Razer was brutal to deal with, didn't want to help, didn't care, wouldn't do anything for us.

How on earth did a public service get it so right, and a public company so wrong?
The cost of a therapist is in the ballpark of $100/hour, and Twitter is essentially anti-therapy in that one relieves psychological trauma and the other inflicts it, so to properly evaluate the profitablity of Twitter we must take into account that it should be paying its users $100/hour to use it.
What does free speech have to do with Twitter?

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/rcna81961
There are two separate goals: to simulate the brain in software, and to understand brain algorithms. They overlap, but they are still distinct, and appeal to different groups of people. Neuroscientists want to understand detailed brain operations. They are primarily interested in the brain itself. AI researchers want to understand intelligence, they are primarily interested in higher brain functions (e.g. reasoning, attention, short/long memory, emotions, motivations, goal setting, etc).

We can't (fully) recreate the brain in software partly because we don't know enough, and partly because it's too computationally complex - for example, we can't simulate an entire modern CPU at the transistor level - even though we know how each transistor works, and what each transistor does in the CPU - because each transistor requires a detailed physical model with hundreds of parameters. It's simply not computationally feasible using current supercomputers. Brain is even less feasible to simulate if we want to accurately simulate each individual neuron in it - even if we knew exactly how it works.

But the second goal is much more feasible, and we have made great progress simply by scaling up simple known algorithms which approximate some information processing functions in the brain (mainly pattern matching/prediction and attention). I can talk to GPT4 today just like I talk to other humans, and by the way, this is only possible because out of all AI/ML algorithms people have tried over the last 70 years, the most brain-like one have won (ANNs). If we want to make further progress in AI or if we want to make GPT5 to be more human-like (not sure we do), we don't necessarily need to simulate brain at a neuronal level, we simply need to understand a little bit more about higher level brain functions. Today, we (ML researchers) might actually benefit more from studying psychology than neuroscience.
Parent should know that the hurtfulness of having a different opinion about the best use of a computer cannot be overstated. Imagine if my great grandfather who survived the holocaust read this comment--it would kill him even worse than hitler tried to.
There’s also a lack of actual communication. Yes, an AI image generator can stick a pattern into an otherwise totally different kind of image. But there’s no communicative meaning there other than what I just mentioned. There’s no cleverness, nothing interesting to discover in the details, no space where the imagination can fill things in because it’s all plainly arbitrary, no deeper meaning other than a shape embedded in a pattern fill, however complicated the fill might be.

I went looking at the details of the original spiral medieval town and all I found was a woman’s skirt standing on its own with no body. And I know perfectly well the AI isn’t trying to say anything clever with that.
Serverless Is Not All You Need
Serverless is very appealing, but it's not a panacea for all your data infra problems.
But $26B seems like a pretty good tax write off. Seriously tho, How much of this drop (adjustment to reality) could Musk potentially write off on taxes, etc? Especially when it was pretty obvious he tanked it on purpose.
> The burden of proof should probably lie upon whatever party would initiate legal action. I am not a lawyer, and won't speculate further on how that looks.

You're proposing a law. How does it work?

Who even initiates the proceeding? For copyright this is generally the owner of the copyrighted work alleged to be infringed. For AI-generated works that isn't any specific party, so it would presumably be the government.

But how is the government, or anyone, supposed to prove this? The reason you want it to be labeled is for the cases where you can't tell. If you could tell you wouldn't need it to be labeled, and anyone who wants to avoid labeling it could do so only in the cases where it's hard to prove, which are the only cases where it would be of any value.
> In the performance review, one of the things mentioned was that I wasn't communicating with him enough. I pointed out how one-sided our relationship was, I would come to him and rarely the reverse. He said that he was very busy and doesn't always have time to come by my office but couldn't explain how he did that for all the other engineers.

In case it's comforting to you, I'll let you in on a secret: For guys like Scott, there's always going to be a made-up excuse. You were his chosen scapegoat, and there was literally nothing you could do that would be right. I've had a manager like this, and it's hopeless. They'll choose 1+ people on the team as their "Can Do Nothing Wrong" golden boys, and they'll choose 1+ people as their "Can Do Nothing Right" scapegoats, and that's just the way it is. You unlucked into a bad manager.
Related from earlier:

Fidelity has marked down the value of Twitter/X by 65%

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38073218
There is no Windows for RISC-V, not even .NET is ported.