skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In the examples you've given, no. But let's say those firefighters got the address wrong, or are responding to a less-than-truthful 911 call made by someone else, then seemingly yes. Or paramedics slice off your clothing because you were sleeping on a park bench and they imagined you might need medical intervention.

I'm talking about the entity running the services being responsible, and not the individual firefighters/paramedics/cops/etc, assuming they are following department policies in good faith and all that. These things are true costs of providing the services, and should be correctly attributed to avoid perverse incentives. Should we allow firefighters to roll up to a gas station, fill up with diesel, and then declare it's just part of responding to an emergency and not pay?

Of course, examples involving firefighters and paramedics are somewhat limited, as their actions are generally helping rather than interpersonal aggression. In the original example, there is the immediate response of breaking up the fight, which I don't take issue with (assuming it's not a staged fight on a movie set). The victim of the attack being arrested/detained while the police sort things out is where the anti-justice starts to happen - from the victim's informed perspective it is clearly wrong. Only from a limited-information perspective is it necessary. The authorities have limited information at the time, and thus choosing that course is reasonable. But that choice still causes harm that is apparent after all the details are known. And post facto it's not reasonable for authorities to shrug off their responsibility for that.

Furthermore the situation is fraught with perverse incentives and properly assigning responsibility is necessary to minimize them. For example, cops casually resenting the victim for some interpersonal reason and keeping them in jail overnight as extra-judicial punishment.
The theory of PEGs is fundamentally different but I haven't been in either's guts recently to be a reliable explainer of them.

For practical purposes, PEGs are always linear time and can easily handle prioritized choice, with the downside that declared priority is the only way to resolve ambiguity. Backtracking is cheap but they are stateless in a very specific technical sense, so can't handle some semantic constructs. The no ambiguity thing means they only succeed or fail, no incremental parsing of incomplete grammar for example like you would want in a syntax highlighter. Some PEG libraries aren't "pure" PEGs and can get around these limitations though.

In real use they tend to have a very straightforward mapping between declaration and grammar. I got used to them in Janet, which has them in the standard lib instead of regex and for that purpose they are incredible. Much easier to write and especially edit. They also work well for some languages but there are some real world language features that they simply can't parse.
I usually have the camera on during the first few minutes then turn it off.

I usually do something else until it's my turn to speak at daily meeting so there is no reason to look like I'm not listening. I am .. just while doing something else.
I don't know what's up with AV1 software decoding but it uses considerably more CPU than HEVC or VP9
To the extent that Stable Diffusion models are "lossy compression", the main one is somewhere between 1 and 10 bytes per image depending on whose answer I use for the question "how many images was it trained on?" (I assume the cause is 1.5, 2.0 and SDXL having different answers and the reporters conflating them). The geometric mean of those is ~three bytes, which is only enough for one single RGB pixel per image.

For all the legal issues — and the artistic flaws — I still find it quite remarkable how good it is at such a small size.
It replaces the 13 inch macbook pro with m2. Apple always has a “pro” macbook at that price point and it is one of the better selling macbooks, because not all “pro” users have a need for cpu grunt. A lawyer, for example, probably wants a “pro” class of hardware but doesn’t need more than an 8 gb m1. You could argue they should get a macbook air, but this 14 inch macbook pro is effectively that but with a better screen and more ports, which is exactly what that kind of buyer needs.
I think Valve gets way too much credit. They haven't abused their market position as much as they could have but they did normalize always-online DRM schemes. CS2 skin trading is also a hive of illegal/underage gambling and scams.

If you want to valorize a digital games retailers, I would suggest GOG is a better candidate.
Microsoft accused of damaging Guardian's reputation with AI-generated poll
Huh, I didn't know that, good point! Even weirder though. Hopefully it's a prelude to built-in support.
See https://github.com/mit-han-lab/streaming-llm and others. There's good reason to believe that attention networks learn how to update their own weights (Forget the paper) based on their input. The attention mechanism can act like a delta to update weights as the data propagates through the layers. The issue is getting the token embeddings to be more than just the 50k or so that we use for the english language so you can explore the full space, which is what the attention sink mechanism is trying to do.
Your first comment seemed to imply that the article was written to punch down on an “anti-racist” perspective. Am I misunderstanding your perspective?
I didn't mean that. I meant these aren't the kind of images where you're going to get usable vectors.
> Tbf on one hand, 3rd party controllers are often absolute crap for all platforms, cheap shitty stuff.

I don't think we are talking about the MadCatz controllers you gave your younger sibling.

This is 2023.

There are many third party controllers that are superior in every way to stock ones. I've got a few 8BitDo controllers that I use to play basically everything possible, since bluetooth is so ubiquitous now.
I have but that's a different discussion altogether. Windows is an operating system that takes control away from user, privacy lacks, it's bloated with tons of garbage and so on. It may be okay for gaming but I'd use a separate partition for daily computing that isn't Windows
a signal of competence, by fundamentally understanding how domains work.
The way I have done this in the past is to use an adapter library that maps from the incoming lambda event to whatever framework you are using (like fastify or jax-rs for example). Your code looks like the normal http request handler stuff you would normally write, but it isn’t running an http server inside the lambda beyond whatever stuff AWS does under the covers of course. I’ve deployed many Lambda based HTTP APIs in this pattern and its my preferred approach to using Lambda, though I would rather target a standard container orchestrator if available.
exactly, the 'about' page, is all I needed to see
Honestly, I think that's okay, at least I only create .zip files, and when I do, it's just to send several files together.
Only Power users care about the compression ratio, and they will install their favorite software anyway.
I never really thought about the fact it was Somalia's TLD, or that it was (seemingly) a random choice because it happened to be available.

I always thought it was a play on shared objects (.so files).
Does this apply to workers in CA who work for employers headquartered out of state?
LookAway – a smart and native macOS app for preventing Computer Vision Syndrome
If your NAS has a hot spare drive installed then it should probably include the degraded mount option by default and automatically add the hot spare drive to the filesystem in the event of a failure. Alternatively, if there's enough free space on the surviving drives to rebalance the array and restore redundancy without replacing the failed drive, that operation could be kicked off automatically. Or the filesystem can be (hopefully temporarily) set to not store new data redundantly, if that is an acceptable risk for the user. But the filesystem cannot know which method the user would prefer; automatically rebuilding the array involves policy decisions that are outside the scope of the filesystem and requires userspace tooling.

If the system doesn't have spare capacity ready, the only sane response is to not boot/mount normally. "giving the user error messages written to their terminal, in logs, etc" isn't a real solution for something like a NAS with no terminal connected and nobody looking at the logs as long as they can still establish a SMB connection; it's too likely to be a silent failure in practice. Mounting the filesystem degraded but read-only makes sense if it's necessary to boot the system so that the user (or their pre-configured userspace tooling) can decide how to deal with the problem, but a lot of Linux distros aren't happy with the root filesystem being read-only.

In summary: there's no single right answer to the problem of a failed drive, and btrfs defaults to what is the safest behavior based on the information available to the filesystem itself. Userspace tooling with more information can make other, less universal choices. A distro that tries to simply adopt btrfs as a drop-in replacement for ext4 probably doesn't have all the tooling necessary to make good use of the unique features of btrfs.
This literally happens constantly in contested regions, even on google maps.
You are incorrect, that was turned over on appeal. But as you will see in "Subsequent Events," legality does depend on the specific cake.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colora...
"Hurr...durr...windoze bad and Bill Gate killed my puppy"

- Average karam farming HN user
As far as I understand it, they were not forced to respect the DNT header in their processes. They were only forbidden to claim that the DNT header would not be legally binding and therefore not respected.

The court did not force LinkedIn in any way to actually respect or at least consider the DNT-header in their processes.

This is how I (being a German native-speaker) understood this article by the usually very reliable heise online: https://www.heise.de/news/Do-Not-Track-LinkedIn-darf-nicht-m...
>what is wrong with this person?

Two common kinds of foolishness are:

1. There is no right way to do a thing

2. You must never deviate from the right way of doing the thing

Many foodies derive a misplaced pride from preaching #2.
Malicious NuGet packages abuse MSBuild to install malware
coincidentally, as you wrote this comment an anti .us article began rising: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38084516
It wouldn't surprise me if places like Nigeria have a bunch of semi-whitewashed English speaking faces/voices to perform this kind of grey area work. Even better if some of their family is part of a hostage taking gang so they can burn the candle from both ends.
Sounds like a low key way to force employees back into the office.
This was discussed here not too long ago. I assume not much has changed since then.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31902707
Not on those with a non-pro M chip.
This is amazing, good job.
Nor is Twitter, though.
Airbnb is a pile of sh!t that will screw over travelers on a whim. Please DO NOT PROMOTE THAT COMPANY.

Use hotels. They're cleaner, cheaper, and full of amenities. Plus, you don't have to clean before you leave!

Edit: And, before anyone downvotes me too much, think about the fact that Airbnb does NOT audit any stays or even verify proof of ownership of the property and/or the right to sublet.

If you do complain, Airbnb will give you the runaround for months in end, perpetually pushing goalposts further down the field, even amid a slew of overwhelming evidence.

Yes, this is empirical data I'm working off of. And, no, it wasn't a one-off event.

Imagine all the crap sold on ebay that isn't vetted. Now, apply that to a vacation rental and you have the company in question.
wait until I what about?
This is California. We can't have any affordable living options.
what about .me ?
Rainforest QA CEO: What happened when we killed freemium
Dynamic Typing with Dependent Types
This is a pretty dismissive exaggeration of people's thoughts. China does, famously, control businesses. It doesn't have to be absolute dictation of every decision to warrant suspicion.
I feel this is usually a hugely asymmetric problem. The other example I've seen is the model being able to easily complete "The color of the sky is" with "blue", but then failing to complete "Blue is the color of" with "the sky". I say, d'uh, why would it?

If you take the training data, or in general, imagine taking all that humans ever wrote or spoke in English to date, you'll expect to find an overwhelming amount of cases where "The color of the sky is" ends with "blue". However, "Blue is the color of" can easily have a hundred thousand different plausible completions, and "the sky" won't even be one of the more likely ones. In the absence of additional context that strongly hints at the answer, one should NOT expect a properly working LLM to frequently propose "the sky" as completion to "Blue is the color of".
Finished Software is a beautiful thing, and personally I use a bunch of software I wrote back in the 90's and after.

BUT (and it's a fairly big But) software does not work in a vacuum. If the software does any interactions with other software, think any kind of networking like email, ftp or whatever, think printing, and so on, then you should expect it to stop working (in those areas at least) at some point.

All network protocols get tweaked from time to time - TLS code changes - Authentication schemes change, I could go on but you get the point.

I've lost count of the number of people who complain to me "but it worked yesterday" - and sure it did - BUT the "world changed and you didn't keep up."

I love finished software - but not all (categories of) software will run forever. Once there is other software involved, then sooner or later it'll likely "stop".
Google’s Chip Designing AI - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR9IusOpEzk

Analog Chip Design is an Art. Can AI Help? - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNypq1XuZRo
One of the first things I saw Linux do was utilize two mouses with two separate mouse pointers (serial and ps2 at the time), I was a young teenager and it blew my mind and I was installing Linux at home by the end of the month.
The issue at hand isn't actually directly about how the output images contained the Getty logo; the lawsuit isn't saying "you're showing our logo on your output, which isn't a Getty image, and we take issue with that". It's whether Getty images can be ingested into the training set without consent or compensation to Getty.

The reason the distorted logos matter is because they make it much more difficult to claim that Getty images were not ingested and used for training — if they weren't, then how come the outputs have those logos? And similarly, they make it much more difficult to claim that these source images were only used as "inspiration" for the generative algorithm and thus fall under fair use — if they're only used for "inspiration", how come they generate/copy easily-recognizable parts of the original images (i.e. the logo) as-is?
Exactly my point. It’s technically feasible to do many things. Apple will do what Apple does. Try to upsell you into the higher tier hardware.
This is true for some types of transformative work, but aggregating to make money off others work is not generally allowed. I think Open AI are in for a hard time with this when people look at the results and see their work clearly.
Also using Blackwater mercenaries so they could just brush any of their deaths under the rug as they typically didn't use Americans for dangerous and unprotected jobs.
Really? A lot of my beliefs came from books, not from first principle inference.
It is more accurately the pipe dream of finished software. In general the environment in which a piece of software is used constantly changes and so the software has to change. Or be abandoned and replaced with something new. And yes, there are some exceptions.
The Developer's Guide to SSO
Your intuitions can often lead you astray. For example, the curse of dimensionality [1] deceives our intuitions about volume at high dimensions.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_dimensionality
Did it compile to wasm and run at the edge at scale?
Are you sure it's finished? Did it handle the case where the output stream couldn't be written to, for example?
the IETF and ICANN have codified the underlying principles that tie ccTLDs to countries and your "here's a thought" won't do any good to change that.
Are you saying you just automated free will in such a simple algorithm?
> That's a difficult question because the boundaries of similarity/derived works for copyright purposes are determined by judges and juries based on their intuitions.

I believe that's why DALL-E bans some keywords related to alive artists. To show they have "no intention to violate copyrights".

And that's why I'm so worry about that we're heading to a future where open, uncensored models are illegal and closed source AI-as-a-service services are legal. It's not fearmongering: right now, you can't use GPL code in your closed source apps, but you can use GPL code on your server running a service that provides the exact same functions. I believe it has already hugely undermined the original intent of GPL (written in an era before SaaS became popular).

Some AI proponents say ML is the biggest invention since steam machines. I don't know if it's true, but if we end up stuck in a situation where open models are illegal while AI-as-a-service is legal, then it's the biggest step toward a dystopia since steam machines.
We should get rid of cookies in general! And the web. Hear me out.

The Web makes it so that there is one server and lots of customers. It has to be hardened against SPAM, DDOS, etc. It pays all the costs. But also recoups them by tracking, it’s called surveillance capitalism.

Every site should have no idea how many people visited, actually. Just a bunch of static front-end content that gets passed around.

If people want to store their data, they can pay dumb pipes to store encrypted data.

Get rid of email too. Anyone who gets ahold of your email address can spam you. Instead people should pay for the dumb pipes to store messages, and you can give out capabilities for your attention. They can be transferable but if they are abused then you cut off the root of that tree. And you should charge for using them, too. Just cause someone has your public address doesn’t mean they can reach you.

In short, DNS and the Web and Email promote a certain dynamic where people invest in an upfront service and then take advantage of extreme power disparities forever, to recoup costs. And if they take on equity investors in a ponzi scheme until they IPO then they have more and more costs to recoup. There is no end to it. Wall street earnings depend on surveillance capitalism to continue.
I am not trying to defend copyright. I am trying to defend the incentives and ability of humans to dedicate their lives to something that might be innate to all to some degree but only comes to fruition after long years of dedication.

Older societies did not have copyright but they, manifestly, had ways to sustain creatives.

People wax philosophical about paradigm changes and other vacuities yet refuse to answer a simple question: how will society reward human creativity that takes a lifetime of cultivation to flourish.
Only if one actively uses them that way, in defiance of the laws in question.
This really only applies to northern Europeans. We are the only cold adapted peoples because of the ice age.

But it’s a really really huge finding for more natural cures to both mood disorders and immune disorders. If zinc deficiency was tested more regularly in the population, with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, we would probably find a lot of people would be helped by taking zinc and possibly some other supplements.
the whole .de
Is "scabs" not editorialisation? It's rarely used other than in a derogatory fashion.
> I think it's already flawless.

There are more than 18K open bugs in Bugzilla for Firefox. That's far from flawless for everyone.
Someone's gotta control the list of domains under a TLD and arbitrate who actually owns them and what their name servers are. When that's a private company they are subject to laws of the countries they operate in (and if it's international consortium, whatever country holds the most power within the consortium).

I imagine there are a few countries and companies that'd prefer the control of their internet presence not be strictly in the hands of the US government.

Though certainly there are folks who don't totally think through whose in control of their domain, see: https://techcrunch.com/2011/04/04/letter-ly-abrupt-ly-loses-...
Glad to be a part of the formbricks community
It's almost as funny as the Dodge Charger EV that little makes vroom vroom sounds. Then again, most gear shift columns, wheels, etc on EVs are just another form of skeumorphism, just not as pronounced.
This reminds me of the scene in Ghost in the Shell when the man approaches the terminal and then each of his fingers subdivide into thin metal wires, flurrying across the terminal’s interface.

I wonder how research is going w.r.t. augmenting perceptual input bandwidth for humans. It seems like a strong limiting factor on the species.
I'm slightly confused by the tone, but perhaps it's the machine translation. Is strike breaking illegal in Sweden or are they just surprised that it has happened? Is strike breaking very unusual in Sweden? Because as an American, this is exactly what I expect Tesla to do.
I like the idea, but not the implementation. I think it should be done as a tax credit for the employee or the company instead.

Doing so creates positive incentives for companies to hire remote workers in California. Requiring the company to pay up by force of law disincentivizes companies from hiring remote workers in California.

I also think that it would be more equitable since an employee’s home office setup belongs to them and not their employer.
but didn't you feel the urge to give an option specifying which font to use?
How is this related to that?
Did you increase your zinc supplementation further? It sounds like you have had some success with self-treatment so I’m curious what you did.
I'd tell you, but I accidentally a word.
Project Aria – An egocentric dataset from Meta
Congrats on the launch!

Question:

* How do you see open-source being an advantage for Formbricks when competing with other tools in the market?
With the microservice architecture it’s easier to lock things down. You can’t have someone outside of your team just give access to a dataset or similar because excel can’t get a connection directly into your DB. Which is an argument you could rightfully make for monoliths, except in my experience, someone always finds a sneaky way into the data on monoliths, but it’s too hard for them to do so with MicroServices.

If you gave me total control over everything, I’d probably build a couple of monoliths with some shared modules. But every time the data is centralised, it always somehow ends up being a total mess. With MicroServices you’ll still end up with a total mess in parts of the organisation, but at least it’ll be in something like PowerBI or even your datawarehouse and not directly in your master data.

Or to put it differently, for me MicroServices vs monoliths is all most completely an organisational question and not a technical one.
I just typed randomly and got 50%. Does that mean I've got more free will than you? Is my will random? I've got my doubts, but I don't have anything better either.
I think many people have never experienced and don't realize how mind-bending a clear night sky in the winter without light pollution is. You need to get pretty far from civilization but when you do you will see so many stars, colors and effects you had no idea were visible without a telescope. The first time I experienced it I couldn't believe my eyes and it redefined my perception of space.