skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The Kubernetes API is structured as "resources". (I'm oversimplifying but it's OK for what we are going to explain here).

In this case. Gateway is merely a new resource type introduced to replace the aging and inadequate Ingress resource. GatewayClass was introduced alongside it as a way for the infrastructure providers to define essentially a "template" for how Gateways can be created that are tied back to a specific implementation.

This is similar to how StorageClass and PersistentVolume (two other resources) already work for defining block storage in Kubernetes.

This isn't buzzword soup and the original commenter just has no clue what they are talking about so there isn't any point in defending their potential point because there isn't one there. The text repeats these terms a lot because they are what are being discussed, as in -concrete- things. Not buzzwords.

FWIW I hate buzzwords, marketing and pretty much everything else of that ilk. Talk is cheap, show me the code. In this case, this is the code.
Those kinds of movements aren't new though: Entire generations in many a country ended up emigrating across the sea, back when it was far slower and dangerous, to make their fortunes, as their home was too poor to handle more than one son. And today we have our home culture on our phones. I can watch TV from my home country, and my home team's soccer matches live. I can video call whenever, for free.

So maintain connection has never been easier, and migration is not any worse. I have no doubt there are far more things than social media making people more unhappy than historically, but having to move away from where we were born isn't it.
Hey there! If you need anything reach out to us at support@forwardemail.net
Technically speaking every military is made up of civilians … every soldier was once a civilian.

That said, there is a difference between you voluntarily signing up to join the military and you being dragged into it.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-veri...
It’s easy to get the free users, where of just a smaller % need to upgrade to keep you afloat. Then there’s the possibility to upsell other related services like analytics or logs.

Betterstack did this very well.
There is a very interesting example, but unknown to western readers. It's called Bilibili.

It's the largest video platform in China[0]. However, it keeps losing money since forever, including in last year, and is expected to keep losing more in 2023.

[0]: Youtube is blocked in China and you need a VPN to access it there.
At the end of the day startups are not there to be successfull on their own. You birth a baby, raise it, then sell it and watch as your metaphorical child becomes everything it shouldn't have been. You might have money, but the corp you sold it to owns that intellectual property.

For long term businesses to succeed on their own we have to remove intellectual property laws. Allow for actual innovation not barred by vertical integration and oligopoly cronyism. The current system rewards whoever buys all the startups that develop IP. Sometimes the horde of lawyers force them into it.

The other reason is that it takes a team, and few are ready or believe they can work in startup conditions. Or theyre devs that got in early with another corp and truly do not know what it's like to build a foundation. The specific expertise necessary is also difficult to source.
Their approach to permissions is mind-bendingly weird. The technology is completely good, what’s weird are the policies of which permissions the user is asked about. I don’t think there’s ever been a permission popup for full-screen notifications, has there? From what I remember that’s how a lot of adware has been able to install itself so easily.
> revealing which specific services your customers used - for example, whether they read a page about Kennedy or about Oswald

If you authenticate with OAuth, the OAuth server doesn't get to know what particular subresources you visit. It only gets to know which URL initiated the authentication (and whether it tracks even that is an open implementation question).

In other words sure Wikipedia can tell government what pages you visit, but to say that this law does enable that or require that even as a side effect is pure FUD.
I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework. Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load). Next.js solved the worst React problems.

I don't think it ruined React at all. I think it helped React gain in popularity - which you might interpret as "destruction".
Mongo appears to have a decent driver for it. I'd lean to that if i were looking for an alternative to SQL.

You shouldn't have any issues integrating it into Absinthe, because it doesn't have any ecto bindings out of the box. (There's a helper library, but even that is fairly small.)

I have heard of people using mnesia, but it's not really that common. I'd personally avoid it unless I had a good reason not to.
Wait, doesn't Pixel camera app support QR code? I agree that its not ideal app to read a code, but it's better to have by default. It's the same feature as iPhone, so beginner user will find (or taught by iPhone user) it works
Thanks for the heads up. I was pretty checked out by episode 2 (Everyone knew Wernher was a Nazi. Hell, by 1970 they had been rearming Nazis in West Germany to fight the Soviets for 20 years!) but as you say it was only getting worse. I just read through the episode summaries and it doesn't sound like I missed much.

What the hell even happened? It's not like Ronald Moore lacked experience. After Voyager and BSG he should know the formula: the A plot is actual story events and B plot is interpersonal conflict among the cast. You set up conflicts in the B plot to add tension on if they can overcome the challenge in the A plot. What you don't do is spend 40 minutes out of a 60 minute episode on squabbles among the astronaut wives. It's a show about stuff happening in space! Show us things happening in spaceships!

Just another failure to add to the scrap pile of all the "prestige" dramas produced during Peak TV. Hollywood responded to an unprecedented demand for content during Covid by disappearing up their navels about gender and race. An incredible waste of billions of dollars and millions of man-hours.
Ultimately it is the civilians who provide the resources for their government and military to function.

If your government engaged in widespread offensive wars that leave millions dead, then I think that your civilians become a valid military target.

If your country isn't respecting the other civilians, then why would you expect another country to respect your civilians?
Peter Zeihan has been ostracised?
Internal slides on the work of the Google "Ads Quality" team
The United States has done a lot of wrong in the world, and has taken many innocent lives.

It has not done anything near the magnitude of Imperial Japan or Nazi Germany.

If the United States engaged in _true_, genocide, killed millions, or annexed other countries, then I would fully support a war against it.

I don't believe that the United States has done more wrong than good in its existence purely because of the atrocities of the Axis.
I've tried Fly.io probably 3 times. I've never gotten a simple Node.js project to deploy correctly. Meanwhile, I deployed the same projects to DigitalOcean and Render without a single change successfully every time.
Wish granted.

Ed: not for long.
> I know 0 people who use more than two monitors on any OS.

Three in this thread alone, and shifting the goalposts from “studies show it is bad” to “I don’t know anyone with multiple monitors” or “It is tiring to move your head around all the time” indicate you are not debating this in good faith, so I am done with this chat.

Have a great day!
Japan's automakers are keeping sports cars alive in the EV era
Ask HN: Has anyone (un)successfully staged an intervention?
Buddy's going through it. Would greatly appreciate hearing what worked or what didn't for people who have been there for a friend in crisis.

No, I don't want the 'seek professional help' etc advice. He's already SSRI'd up the wazoo and I'm losing him.

I've invited him to stay for a week and I need to make it count. What was your experience?
> This disgusting review was sitting at the top of the review page for Search by Image on the Chrome Web Store: https://i.imgur.com/P1QU176.png

> This person has edited their review a couple of times in the past year which pushed it to the top, and also emailed me with a similar demeaning message. I've reported it to Google staff, and they thought that the review did not break their content policy, so they did not remove it.

So? What's the point you're making? Users aren't allowed to have preferences about software they get for free? User experience doesn't matter for free software? Who did you release this software for if not for users?

It's a 4 star review, ffs. Do you think every review that isn't glowing is disgusting? Why on earth would you expect Google staff to remove a review which merely expresses a preference?

It really feels like a significant portion of Hacker News just doesn't really grok the whole "doing nice things for other people" thing. If you only did this for money or glowing praise for how generous you are, you'd have been better off choosing one of those and pursuing it singlemindedly instead of trying for both money and being perceived as generous, and then being surprised when people notice you aren't doing either perfectly. And sure, you're not obligated to just do it out of the kindness of your heart, and you have every right to choose how nice you want to be. But if you aren't doing it for purely prosocial reasons, then maybe don't expect people to fawn over how purely prosocial you are.
Prevayler: Transparent architecture for business object persistence in Java
This relates to one of the topics I want to get to on https://rationaldino.substack.com/ but which will take a while.

There is a very simple litmus test to tell which are likely to fade, versus which aren't. How certain are they?

https://www.amazon.com/Expert-Political-Judgment-Good-Know/d... reports on a long-term study about pundits. Basically they can be divided into two groups:

1. Hedgehogs. Have one overarching theory that they are certain of.

2. Foxes. Can pick and choose from a variety of sources.

Both groups are smart, informed, and interesting. But when you follow them for a long time, a clear pattern emerges.

- Foxes do much better at making future predictions that come true.

- Hedgehogs become far more popular pundits, and generally wind up getting paid far better. Most pundits with popular shows are hedgehogs.

Why? My theory is that we listen to pundits because it is comfortable to outsource our thinking to them. We find that comfortable if they are smart, well-informed, and certain. It is easy for us to think, "Well if this smart and well-informed guy is so certain, I'd surely agree if I did the work. So now I don't have to bother."

There is a problem here. We become certain when it is easy for us to think a thing true, and hard for us to think it might be false. We feel that the evidence is truly overwhelming. It may be overwhelming. But it is more likely that we're simply being intellectually dishonest. So we actively choose intellectually dishonest pundits who agree with our presumptions, and then become sure that they are right. We enjoy listening to them. But, being intellectually dishonest, they are probably wrong. And now we're emotionally committed to their brand of insanity!

Try this rule of thumb out. Assume that a person who is certain, is probably wrong. And when you find yourself feeling certain, nurse that little doubt about how you REALLY know. It takes time, but consistently making this choice can change your life. For a start, you'll start actually thinking about things that you currently only think you're thinking about.
I didn't know anything about sailing, but your one comment made me search up point of sail and now you've opened my eyes to something that was a mystery to me for all my life -- how sailboats can "course made good" against the wind. Thank you.. this stuff is amazing, and sailing is an incredible science!
Fear of a WebKit Planet (2013)
Also known as compulsive contrarianism
Yeah how so?
> "It also means people have to live in dense apartments instead of spread out suburbs and semi rural living."
> "I mean not having to be in close quarters with other humans."

Suburbs tend to be sterile and devoid of character, but I do agree that they promote living in a bubble away from other humans.

Why that is desired or a widespread model for living needs more explanation. Sure some people like to be hermits, but as a social species it seems odd and also a highly inefficient way to accommodate a larger population. Also peculiar if one likes true "wilderness", because more suburban sprawl means less of that.

And suburbs have got to be one of the key factors in the reported loneliness epidemic. With the reports of increasing prevalence of loneliness, seems odd to want the default way of life to be one that we both agree means living spread out and not close to one another.

And yeah some people do like suburbs. On the other hand, Irvine ca despite being such an upscale and model suburb, is like living in the set of the truman show: artificial feeling and boring. People often describe it as sterile or like living in an office park. The landscaping of suburbs, such as irvine, also tend to be environmental disasters on top of being utterly bland. It's lose lose.

Not to mention, car transport being the paramount design concern makes for truly miserable pedestrian life and running trails. Running next to 6 lanes roads with 55 mph speed limits is just a terrible experience - irvine is crisscrossed with them.

Not sure how one can have a better road system than irvine - but it doesn't end up saving the residents time - things are just more spread out and they have to driver further between them and then fight for parking.

We've tried a car oriented transportation plan for decades - it gets one LA traffic. Parts of the 405 have 12 lanes. If you build it, congestion comes. We've tried it for decades, it's horrible. What is it they say about trying the same thing over and over and expecting another outcome? Oops actually the i5 - 405 merge near irvine has 26!!! lanes amongst all the ramps and truck bypasses. Needs more, right?
If it was shallow then it wouldn’t take 25 years for a human brain to fully train. The fact that some parts of it need that much data mean they must be way up the hierarchy.
I suspect not that many care about 4K streaming. Many might actually be doing the majority of their consumption on their phones in the first place.
Right. But they're not rigorous degrees compared to pure math/science degrees, hence why the bottom 20% observation comes into play.
WW2 was ended quickly and our two primary enemies became not just our allies, they also joined us as top-5 economic powerhouses. That's really something to be proud of on many levels.

The bombs were horrific but also seem likely to have contributed to that outcome.
To be clear, Taleb has never revealed publicly any proof of trades he has conducted, any proof of profits, and he has written books of wisdom without ever showing his data. I consider him a popsci fraud like Dan Ariely - show the data or GTFO
Also history fuckery.
Some tests that you can use this calculator on don’t allow you to use a calculator with a built in CAS. Python is fine because you would still need to copy your own CAS onto the calculator for it to have that feature
Ethics is a great intellectual exercise.

Ethics does nothing to protect the innocent.
Is the dough HTML, cheese CSS and sauce JS?
"You’re basis for truth often relies on authority of your source."

No. This is such a common logical error that it has an old name: Argumentum ad Verecundiam (often shortened to Verecundiam, or Appeal to Authority in English.) Saying "I know this because authority X said so" - you don't know it at all. It has the epistemological status of outright faith.

What counts is the connection of statements to reality and their logical integrated cohesion as a whole. And that's regardless of the source.

Experts/Authorities are neither automatically right or wrong. No honest expert or authority ever demands that their statements be taken on faith. If they actually know what they're talking about, their statements can be logically defended and tied to reality. This is the standard that everyone should be held to.
> they are free to ignore any request I shout at them

Exactly. That's why they're blocking ad-blocker users now. You're describing the exact thing they are doing and going to do more. Guess you're actually supporting Youtuber's policy.
Maybe I could be the Ron of the Apple world. I use Apple products because they probably suck the least, but I can tell you a lot of ways in which they suck.
It depends. Of course a phone is mostly just with you, it still has for ex. the lock screen. It is also more easy and faster to tip on real buttons. If you just have to calculate once a year something, yes, just go with the phone. But all guys I know have a calculator on there working place.
Well beyond "live field testing on untouched targets", the purpose of dropping the bombs was to display the capability to the USSR, and thus assert the US position as hegemon.
[dupe]

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38061779
I recently made a comment on min-maxing as societies cancer these days. Searching for silver bullets in life, business, health, finance rarely yields long-term compounding gains.

We were all conditioned to buy courses to learn programming in 5 minutes, yet we are bound to be disappointed.

We eventually learn though, with more frequent feedback loop and fails.
Yeah my take is, instead of preventing people from killing themselves, the government should use it as a key performance indicator for social services. For example maybe you'd go through a survey/"exit interview" before getting the pill, and the government could keep statistics on how people are responding in order to know what could be addressed. I'm not keen to remove the option and force people to suffer in silence.
> There is no winning with some of these people, they want your time and the results of your work, they want it for free, and they want it to be neatly packaged and presented exactly the way that is most convenient for them. If you deviate even a little bit from their unreasonable expectations, you'll be promptly attacked.

You're making a pretty big leap from "users prefer these things" to "users expect these things".

Are you going to pretend you don't want things to be free, neatly packaged, and convenient? Who wouldn't want this?

And the idea that a four star review which starts with "A good extension." is an "attack" is absurd. Given it appears you expect your users not to express any preferences that aren't exactly what you've implemented, perhaps it's you who has unreasonable expectations?
Respectfully disagree all you want but don’t come here claiming studies that don’t exist.
Agree with the title but like none of the rest. Do they think that people joining family businesses do a good job somehow? There are countless stories of people inheriting things and ruining them because they don't have the acumen of the original creator.

But basically agree that, yes, CEOs don't have skin in the game. In fact almost everyone in big corporations doesn't. It seems to become more about not taking risks that would be socially embarrassing than about doing a good job.

But what could give them "skin"? Maybe fierce competition? But that's kinda lame. With efficiency gains from technology we should be able to live in a world that's not based around fierce competition.

Better than that is fierce accountability. From who? Everyone you can think of. In particular, accountability that they do their jobs right, make the right choices, charge fair prices, treat employees well, treat society and the earth well, etc.

If you think about it... there is no reason in principle that corporations ought to be secretive. Since they should be competing on "honest work", not on tricking and one-upping each other, it seems to me that they should be entirely open and judged for their daily behavior.

The trick, of course, is giving that accountability any teeth.
Non-poaching agreements are illegal in California (they are considered no-compete agreements that harm competition).
Don’t you think us humans are accelerating climate change? Like if we were still dumb and living in caves maybe we wouldn’t pollute so much?
I think I don't have to "follow" or support anyone, or is that become a must in this new digital world? Like, if you don't follow anyone the system will ignore you or something, I don't know.
When that crime is terrorism, it's too late by the time it's happened, and a lot of money laundering is used for this purpose. It's also impossible to prosecute crimes originating in countries outside of your jurisdiction, but funded within your jurisdiction.

Cryptocurrency is more of a blight than it is useful. It's the only reason that cyber ransom is possible.
It doesn’t mean highly dedicated. It means “caring the smallest amount possible which is more than 0”.

Most business interactions are with people who literally do not care at all. Will not consider alternatives, will not give advice, will not tell you you are being silly.

In that context, anything better than that is a big deal. You sometimes encounter people who care a lot, but you don’t usually get to compare them with someone who cares only a little. You still get to compare them with the rest who “give zero shits”.
Mumble is popular because it's free, lean on resources, low on latency, and has incredible audio quality.
Please note that competition laws are very different between California and New York. Maybe that's why finance thrives in NY, while tech chooses CA.
He's right in many ways. They did the best they could at the time under the constraints that they had - try adding type-safety to K&R C while maintaining backwards compatibility with K&R C.

But now the only way forward I see for C++ to maintain its position as a mainstream language is to draw a hard line in the sand and effectively only keep all of the stuff that people refer to when they say "write in Modern C++", and remove everything else.
Get into ideas, not the people who introduce you to them. It's probably still an interesting idea well after the person loses their novelty to you. Don't lose yourself so readily to our bizzare celebrity worship/parasocial culture.
Including Google Video. Google did try the tactic of using their search engine to promote their own video platform, but it was against YouTube and Google only bought them because it didn’t work.
I think about that quite a lot. It's strange how friendly Japan and Germany are considering how terrible WW2 was.

I still don't really understand how such a large shift could occur in such a small amount of time.
No, I’m suggesting something that is more like CSPAN’s old BookTV, combined with a kind of talent agency and marketing firm.
When you can personally verify all the facts about biology, physics, and distant places that you rely on to make decisions every day, then you can throw stones about arguments from authority. The rest of us use a little bit of faith.
Odd that the Azure CTO also writes thrillers about cybersecurity: http://www.markrussinovich.com/
The url for this is simply: https://vercel.com/font

(Submitted earlier this week)
Nope... I'm waiting for Genode to get to the point where I can use it as a daily driver... or GNU Hurd.

Sandboxes and containers are what you do when you don't have proper capability models to utilize. I'll keep putting up with Win10 or Linux until I get that.