skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not, but it is heavily inspired by the Motorola 6800 (predecessor to the 68k).
GitHub's ToS expressly allows them to change the terms of their service at will, and they do indeed publish these changes, and your continued use of their website is considered consent.

Furthermore, as [0] states:

> We may use your information to provide, administer, analyze, manage, and operate our Service. For example, we use your information for the following purposes:

> ...Improve and develop our products and services including to develop new services or features, and conduct research...

[0] https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/privacy-policies/gith...
Depends on the value you ascribe to people's use of easy knowledge.

Circa-1995, I would have said uncategorically yes! It's a wonderful thing!

Today?

I'm much more of the opinion that knowledge hard-earned is knowledge valued and respected. And trivially-earned is... not.

I don't think it's possible to suppress knowledge. Even about NBC weapons.

But I'm on the fence as to whether "putting it on the high shelf where anyone has to work to get it" is a net positive or negative for society as a whole.
The mode of production doesn't affect the fact that you have to do production. If nobody's continually demanding laptops from the laptop maker, they will stop making laptops.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_thrift
??

It already exists? You can buy ARM Windows devices right now. I'm typing this on one. The x86/x64 emulator is pretty good but performance is limited by the slower CPUs.
Their submit feedback thing doesnt work. Something something JavaScript
Even the testing reports are a grey area and questionably enforceable, and a big question about what it applies to.

"In accordance with the Defense Production Act, the Order will require that companies developing any foundation model that poses a serious risk to national security, national economic security, or national public health and safety must notify the federal government when training the model, and must share the results of all red-team safety tests."

It's leap to use the defense production act for this, and unlikely to survive a legal challenge.

Even then, what legal test would you use to determine whether a model "poses a serious risk to national security, national economic security, or national public health and safety"?
It gets better when you have your own domain and you can register with throwaways using spamco@mydomain.
I'm wondering now if Apple tracks this sort of stuff in their released machines. I know my iPad always asks me if I want to send stats to Apple (and I always say no). So let's say that enough people do, then do they have a good idea of how often all the performance cores are used? Max memory B/W consumed? Stuff like that. Back when I was at Intel there were always interesting tradeoffs between available silicon/thermal/margin resource and what made it into the chip. Of course Intel didn't have any way (at that time) to collect statistics so it was always "... but I think we should ..." not a lot of data.
> It should still be able to run an up to date web browser though, right?

For a while, yes, but the browser being up-to-date doesn't make an EOL OS safe to expose to the Internet.

> If one is that concerned about someone exploiting an OS level security flaw to exfiltrate their online banking credentials (wildly unlikely), they should just be doing that stuff in a VM or similarly isolated environment anyways.

Just doing sensitive stuff in a VM isn't good protection at all, since a malicious host can trivially compromise the guest.
I have autism as well. I don't see normal people as disabled, just different. I think seeing normal people as disabled is a rather myopic perspective, and I sometimes hear it from the community. I don't like it, personally. Typically I believe because many of the times I hear it, it comes with a need for superiority of some kind, and that gets in the way of other various practical things.

It's the same kind of tradeoff in autism vs neurotypical people as you would have in frequency vs momentum with particles, or resolution vs distance in wavelengths. This is because the autistic brain has much less information filtering coming in, so the brain is less 'biased' towards certain things, but also gets completely overwhelmed with information more easily.

I believe that the reason that many autism traits and cPTSD traits are similar is because they are one and the same -- that they are an emergent result of autism as a result of culture and the world, etc, and are not necessarily inherent to the condition. They just appear that way I believe because the mean/median of our cultures and how they interact with the condition tends to create a fixed point where those symptoms generally tend to arise.

This makes some sense if one considers that in cPTSD, it is many, many accumulated little 't' traumas of sensory overwhelm where tiny bits of the experience 'overflow' and aren't properly encoded in the memory system (EMDR, and misc therapeutic techniques attempt to soften this feeling so that those sensations can be re-integrated).

As far as day to day life goes, I believe I am a superb hard problem solver, but conversely, the day-to-day 'normal' things, I find quite challenging and overwhelming. I can buffer them some with supplements, reducing sensory input (having routines, things with little extra Shannon information, etc), to keep me in that valid range of not hitting information overwhelm. But I find life significantly harder due to my autism, despite the few gifts it provides.

There's not really 'autism without intellectual impairments', really only an inverted U curve of sensitivity to information -- which absolutely is an impairment depending upon the situation. I have a few narrow areas of exceptional gifting, due to my brain's sensitivity to information, and also will be shut down for up to hours from a single screaming baby at a Costco for the same reason.

It's all a balance, there's always tradeoffs, and one can certainly move up or down that curve a little bit with suppelements depending upon their personal 'sweet spot'. NAC I've found for me suppresses the symptoms some, and aspartame quite strongly magnifies them for a day or two. I use both, oddly enough, though I greatly prefer NAC for a few reasons.

I hope you found this comment informative and interesting. I am happy to discuss further and am willing to answer any questions and/or thoughts. <3 :')))) :')))) <3 Thank you.
This has nothing to do with the article. He's just showing his poor lack of conversational skills, typical of the condition that makes him "superior".
> The people with insufficient 401k balances aren't making the max.

That may be true, but even maxing out probably isn't sufficient anymore for most people.

It's not just starting to be broken now; it's been broken for a long time. The 7% average stock market return is completely irrelevant to how people actually invest. And I'm not even talking about irresponsible investing. I'm talking about allocation models (put x% of your portfolio in bonds; more when closer to retirement), and I'm especially talking about how people tend to have less money to invest when times are bad and prices are low, and more money to invest when times are good and prices are high. What use is stocks being on sale if you've been laid off at the same time?

I think if everyone had a practice of tracking the dates and amounts of all their retirement contributions, and calculated APY from their balances, we'd be a lot closer to exposing the huge lies that are at the root of the investment advice communities. If anyone here is deeply embarrassed about barely beating inflation after 20-25 years of investing, you shouldn't be.
Uh, none of that means housing has to be an investment. The point of a mortgage is that it helps you buy a house and pay it off over time, nothing more. We don't talk about cars being an investment just because people take out 7-year auto loans.

Moreover, passing on generational wealth shouldn't be a feature we want to make easier. You don't want a to push society in the direction where generational wealth is required to live a good life.
Out of curiosity, how much RAM do you have on your MacBook to run containers?
> If we started today to build nuclear plants everywhere, it's not like we would replace fossil fuels tomorrow. It takes time.

Replacing fossil fuels with anything will take time. That doesn't mean we shouldn't start doing it.

> Then we would need to replace absolutely everything that uses fossil fuel to use electricity.

No, we wouldn't. For applications where electricity is not practical (such as, for example, commercial aviation), we can use electricity to make liquid fuels from the CO2 and water vapor in the air, by reversing the chemical reactions that take place when the fuels are burned.

> nuclear plants won't compensate fossil fuels

They will gradually reduce their usage, eventually to zero. You simply refuse to consider the possbility of gradually shifting energy usage in order to not have to "degrow" and lower people's standard of living. Good luck convincing the rest of the world of that. Particularly when "degrow" for most of the rest of the world translates into "stay in poverty forever". Poverty has negative consequences too.
You might like "Software Architecture: The Hard Parts." Though you already describe some of the points of the book. There isn't a magic bullet and every decision to split something apart or which parts to combine has various trade-offs.

The book isn't perfect. The use of afferent and efferent terminology and some of the arbitrary methods to put numbers on decisions weren't ideal. Most of the concepts are sound. The fact that almost every decision has cost/benefit and real world implications for a living product was refreshing. That a monolith can't be cut over instantly with zero effort to a perfect system is absolutely true.

It's good food for thought for anyone considering slicing up a monolith, but maybe don't follow it to the letter.
There’s a lot of reception desks in the world. I mean that’s not the only market for iMacs but Apple could probably build a pretty good multi-billion dollar business going after just the reception desk market if they were dedicated to the cause.
5k 27" panels have only gotten cheaper since the first 5k 27" imac came out.
There’s been a number of people who’ve converted their old 27” iMacs into displays using AliExpress driver boards, if a tinkery solution is appealing. Probably wouldn’t be too difficult to fit an M1 Mac Mini board in the chassis alongside the driver board to produce a 27” M1 iMac if one were so inclined.
It's funny because technically even M1 is good enough for most editing jobs,...

But according to Apple, you need a sound proof dedicated room with 2 couches, and 4 external 4K monitors with a M3 Max and 128GB of memory! :D

Honestly it's getting ridiculous. I'm a dev and I can work on a macbook air no problem. My time wasted reading bad documentation or groking bad code is far more loss than the compile time difference! :)

I'm wondering, who will be their target market with the M3 Ultra? A professional who trains LLMs while producing Hollywood movies, that likes to work from the local Starbucks?

Maybe with M3 max they could finally claim "this thing can start Microsoft Teams in 3 seconds!"
I got a new Mac at work maybe 6 to 9 months after the M1 generation came out.

I would’ve loved one, but some of the tools I needed did not work without real Intel hardware yet and there were no workarounds.

Today there are. But because of that I had to get a new Intel machine. And that’s going to be my machine until it reaches the standard replacement cycle. So I’ll still have it for a few more years probably.

By the same token a family member bought a new (to them, refurb) iMac maybe six months before the M1 iMac came out. Again I think that would’ve been a better computer, but it didn’t exist. And the old computer was on its last legs and needed replacing.

That computer does not get heavy use and will last a long time. It will probably get used until Apple stops updating Intel OSes and it starts becoming a real problem for the user.
I'm looking for advice as I was planning to purchase the 14" M2 Pro MacBook, but I've noticed that the M3 Pro MacBook Pro has been recently released. I'm uncertain about which one to choose, and I'm seeking assistance in making a decision.
My point is that cyclists dope with EPO precisely because the body doesn't produce enough for your oxygen needs. There is a cap, probably for good reasons as you say.
Cracking Encryption with a Neural Network
I believe iOS & Outlook.com only support the mailto:.
Why “of all things”? I think it’s a commentary on the general demand of professional computing, and there’s nothing inherent to web dev that would exempt it from that. I would expect to need—or at least benefit greatly from having—more than 24 GB RAM doing development for almost any target environment.
No like I know I'm word salad here. I just mean that I wonder to what extent certain tendencies are related to stimulant meds vs a natural desire to like be on my own, playing and entertaining myself, and not relying on anyone else to enrich or make sure I'm ok
They didn’t.

Not surprised. But I agree with you. Especially for anything with the word “Pro” on it.
y'guys need Natuonal Twitteritics and Spaces Administration. Or strict openness requirements for social media like telcos. Twitter as for-profit infinigrowth company don't make a huge sense just like wholly private buses and water supply don't work.
> And there aren't even great monitor choices. Studio display costs as much as a low end iMac used to cost. Samsung Ultrafine is horrible (if its even still produced). And other 3rd party monitors usually don't have 5k at 27".

I recall when the first modern iMac came out with a...25" display, I think? The joke at the time was that it was a monitor, and the computer came for free, because no one else was making a monitor of that size and quality, and the price seemed about right for a standalone display.
I put together some time-based filtering I use on my own inbox, it's awesome.

I like letting most of my email land in my inbox, because I don't want to need to check (and purge a bunch of folders). But email of declining value will automatically get moved to folders after a certain amount of time. for example:

* Monitoring alerts go to trash after 4 hours (if it's still broken, I'll get more emails, after all).

* shipping notices from amazon etc go to trash after 3 days (long enough for the item to arrive on time)

* Notices from ups/fedex about "your item is arriving today" go away after 24 hours

* Marketing I don't mind seeing but has a shelf life - I have 2 or 3 time intervals setup for those

* Mailing lists I'd like to read (but often don't get back to) delete after 2 weeks

* Utility bills move to a folder for utility bills after 24 hours

etc. It's awesome - but oddly enough, nobody I ever tell about it gets that excited.
I get spam from legitimate companies who don't honor the unsubscribe links. The problem is that many of them use third-party services to handle the unsubscription server so you're feeding the data broker ecosystem with confirmation that you're an active address.
Probably better thermals than a laptop.
Probably Jimmy Carter. He had a nuclear engineering background.
What was the outcome, diagnostically speaking
how is this noteworthy? could be titled “businessman goes out of town once a month”
But the iMac screen is bigger and higher resolution - not sure about the latter but too lazy to check.
Then why not get a Mac Mini or a Mac Studio and 27 inch Apple monitor.
They said it was done in hardware, so not Metal alone.
Chinese companies? they are working hard to get away from US proprietary tech.
The number of workers in the economy is not zero-sum.
Yup. I found this article quite enlightening:

https://espadrine.github.io/blog/posts/chinchilla-s-death.ht...
Transparent apps for me means configurable up to the option of deleting them and replacing it for someone else. Instead of the tight coupling we have now in MacOS, I'd like to have federated applications bound by protocols instead of needing to update the whole system to add a single feature or fix a bug. I don't think you can delete stock apps without disabling SIP or something.

I don't need to unsolder the chips, or do anything hardware wise, but I'd like to be able to use the hardware without the OS if needs be. That's why I say it's an appliance. It makes sense in terms of business, but it's not like the user is free to use the device how he wants.
I don't know about orders of magnitude left but we're definitely not close yet. This is just 5 languages(and frankly not even the 5 with the most text) and just as importantly, just what is crawlable from the web. There's tons of stuff in popular ebook archives you can't crawl from the web.

This is also relatively code/scientific corpora scant.

We're just getting started.
Expecting your rent to stay constant for decades sounds predatory too.
Addy.io formerly AnonAddy does a good job at that. FastMail also.
There is some brutal +$200, +$200 again upsell here. The $1300 model only has two thunderbolt ports. Want more than two ports? Ca-ching. The $1300 model doesn't have gigabit ethernet. Once again, gotta shell out for the $1500 model. Want pretty colors? Ditto.

It's also, imo, pretty insulting to offer customers a base 256GB ssd these days. Quite fine PCIe 3.0 drives are 512GB/$25. It should be standard. But this is Tim Apple terrain: you need to spend $1700 to get that basic upgrade.
Wow, this could be a new copypasta.
Brad Smith (https://news.microsoft.com/exec/brad-smith/) is a PR person at Microsoft. His role is to make loud statements on matters he has no knowledge of or qualifications to talk about.
I'm +infinity on "antiknowledge", but I like your "entertainment" point.

To harmonize these ideas, I argue to the kids that the "entertainment" choices are like spice on the food. We want enough to enjoy the flavor in question, but not so much that the usage becomes expensive or overpowers the dish.
For dev work I’d think where more muscle starts to make a big difference is with gargantuan codebases, think Chrome or Firefox or something where a full compile takes an hour.
Required minimum distributions start at about 5% (not 10%) at age 72, and increase with age. But your general point stands. RMDs will add to one's tax bill, by regular tax brackets and having up to 85% of Social Security benefits taxed too.
One of the things UK front-end developers really hate is they have to use "color" instead of "colour" to write CSS. :-)
Mistral 7B,The complete Guide of the Best 7B model
I wonder if it didn’t sell well enough. I know it was extremely popular with a lot of us tech people, but the numbers may not have been there.
Is there any statement in this Executive Order that increases the bar for smaller AI companies? Most of the statements are about funding new research or fostering responsible use of the AIs, and the only statement that would add burden to AI companies seems to be the first one: Require that developers of the most powerful AI systems share their safety test results and other critical information with the U.S. government. And only the most powerful AI systems have such a requirement.
That's a good point. The (estimate of the) cost function is key, it determines whether delaying decision is better or worse than making it eagerly and reverting if it turns out to be wrong. You give a good case for when delaying is a better choice.

In my case however, I ended up applying the "LRM" strategy to my own work, where I'm both the decision maker and the sole implementer. This is where I see my mistake. In my defense, the software development books that argued for delaying decisions did not warn that this applies to larger decisions in projects developed by teams, and may not apply to small-scale design decisions made by an individual contributor or a small team in the scope of a small piece of work. It took me way too long to realize that, for most of my day-to-day choices, the cost function is pretty much flat.
They didn't improve the neural engine. M3's NPU is half the speed of the A17 Pro in iPhone 15 Pro.
ok. so grug make good, good point. many good point.

now say others no listen and do opposite of what grug say for month after month. code complex. code very complex

what grug do now
Then why not just buy the Mac Studio + Apple monitor?
I was not expecting a joke about the Spanish Inquisition when I extrapolated from this incomplete information.
Reddit coppied and replaced digg a popular product that depends on social aspect. Excel is still Excel.
5nm vs 3nm and three years of progress. Intel's e-cores have been seeing more generation over generation uplift compared to their p-cores so nothing about this strikes me as anything unexpected.

When the m1 came out details about the m3 were well known and that this was going to be a pretty big generation for performance improvements. I think the surprising thing was that m2 got pretty close to m3 in situations which were not as thermally constrained.
People say this like it’s a fact. Until the courts decide otherwise or your AI model is regurgitating copyrighted data verbatim, generative AI is probably not violating copyright.
Even knowledge of how to commit genocide or manufacture chemical weapons?
I think it’s funny this is being talked about as some future eventuality. It’s happening now, already, in most organizations I’ve been involved with all of these things are happening.
> Workers living paycheck to paycheck (61% of the population, ... means that contributions aren't realistic for millions of people.

This doesn't mean they are poor. From your cite:

"Of those earning $100,000 or more, only 45% reported living paycheck to paycheck"

It just means they see-money-spend-money.
Miss the days when the iMac let you use it as an external monitor.
It appears that people with high-functioning autism and a high IQ have advantages and disadvantages.

According to
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2016.0030..., crystallized intelligence is reduced, verbal skills and comprehension and coding (psychomotor speed, ability to absorb new material, visual motor speed, drive for achievement) are reduced. However, some other factors like image rotation ability, attention to detail and visual search are enhanced. There might be more "deliberative" decision making that tends to reduce biases and errors. According to https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.02.21265802v..., autistic individuals with exceptional ability suffer disproportionately from high anxiety and low self-worth.

It's a mixed bag with tradeoffs and imbalances, but thinking that normies are disabled just shows that you're overvaluing some factors while undervaluing others.
I think sometimes I’m just trying to be lazy, ironically enough. Rather than just write a bunch of these classes, I’ll just make an abstract one… grug create many new problem to help solve problem
I just felt the continued existence of the 13" MacBook Pro was just confusing because it was very arguably worse than the 13" MacBook Air even without considering the price.
Can AI Replace Your Financial Adviser? Not Yet. But Wait
Yes, there’s always that. It’s always less risky to not express these things, but there’s a world of difference between the risk of embarrassment that comes with rejection, and losing an entire community. Avoiding catastrophe is a skill, and I think it comes with balancing self-confidence / charisma with learning to take the hint, among other things.