skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Because it was written in the New York Times and every other major media outlet. Not because it was on social media.

That's how it always worked. Major news outlets are there to pick and choose which news are important to report on, and how to report on them. They set the framing and then everyone copies and pastes the same thing.

It's great if they are ideological, because it changes public opinion on a topic, or ignores topics which shouldn't be talked about. It's good for profit too, as they're the first to get credit, views, clicks, etc.

Reporting the truth has no short term profit or benefit associated with it. However, over a longer period of time people start to notice that even major news outlets are just as full of bullshit as anyone else. It erodes credibility and trust.

What is suspicious is that they didn't reply when pressed to explain what the source was. Wonder, do they ever reply to those? In other words is it because they are embarrassed about this particular story that it was manipulated or that they never reply to those requests anyway. The author is a writer for the Atlantic and New Yorker. If I wrote an email to NYT or AP to ask for an explanation, pretty sure I won't get a response. Do they feel like answering someone like David Zweig is should be a higher priority?
Seriously there is incredibly easy access via twitter, /r/combatfootage, whatsapp, and others to Hamas and Russian atrocities to any teen with a passing interest in global affairs.

And arguably they SHOULD be exposed to this content if we want our society to be versed enough to just maybe take steps to fight it.
Isn't this just laundering money into the cloud division? GOOG was decimated after the last earnings call by poor cloud results. This is at least a billion in revenue for Google Cloud, right?
I stand corrected on the numbers. Still though, the entirety of the Strip is under fire - and a human standing in front of another human is no shield when you blow up both of them
You know, at first I thought this was a load of wank but thinking about it, it does make sense that electricity is used for signalling everything. How does the brain wire itself up? How do cells figure out what to attach to? There must be some sort of mechanism for them to locally communicate.

So if you could give them the signal to reproduce and then signal them to form a structure, it's plausible they would be able to rebuild something.
I think what you're calling mediocre is precisely the same thing I was calling tremendous - the fact it allows us to ship mediocre form inputs with complex programmatic validation and permissions without the need to touch a line of frontend is indeed pretty great.

The use case is https://spotdx.com. We're a YC backed healthtech product with a significant amount of need for safe manual data entry and updates, and the requirements for that data entry evolves semi-frequently. Compared to a traditional frontend framework (say, React), Django Admin drastically slashes the amount of engineering resources needed to ship new kinds of mediocre form input. The way we work at the moment doesn't require a frontend engineer at all to get new internal stuff done.

There's a lot of cool work that has been done across various frameworks to put CRUD interfaces of varying complexity on top of an ORM, but it all seems so repeated and fragmented, and varies wildly in quality between frameworks. I wish there was a tool like ReTool that was tied to our regular backend and ORM.

We do use React for other parts of our product, but avoiding it here is handy.
They need to put more ads on that page. I managed to see some of the text.
1906 was roughly 20 million, which is slightly under the official estimates for the Great Leap Forward. The actual number for 59-61 is closer to 45 million. So no.
But how is it beneficial to those who don’t feel violated beyond the point of absolute necessity to always refuse consent because not every advertisement is guaranteed by nature to always be evil and have not yet come to a similar conclusion as yours as they believe that advertisement as a whole on a digital medium specifically in regards to transactions on a monetary level has not yet met their personal defined level of it being ultimately net evil. And therefore feel arguing against a ban of the practice entirely is not currently the most pressing issue with advertising that you keep telling them, their argument holds no merit, which lends itself to the personal assumption that what they are doing is ultimately wrong and therefore they should feel ashamed for it. They are not currently experiencing a feeling of guilt or shame about expressing their opinion and you are insisting, but not projecting, that they should. Ultimately this devolves into a basic summation of simply having their feelings hurt and wanting you to stop arguing your point, as you both actually understand each each other and can therefore continue this civil discussion we’re having and all continually agree that ultimately our shared responsibility society is working and we are still progressing despite the challenges.
YouTube costs money to run and videos cost money to make. If enough people think they’re entitled to use other people’s work without paying them, that doesn’t work and the free video will disappear or get worse. Content moves behind subscription requirements, videos will have a lot more integrated sponsorship ads, and quality will decline as more people will be creating cheap video aimed at easy monetization options.
I've been happy with Kagi's summarizer (it's not free though)

https://kagi.com/summarizer/index.html
Yeah, also common to introduce tiny difference in a couple of letters in internal document releases as well, so when screenshots end up on the public internet, you know exactly who took it.
Actually, they all are. They are not associative.

If a + b results in an overflow, so will b + a.
Personally I think it's mainly down to the fact that the ORM and admin were designed together, with the intention of supporting the subset of operations needed to build a CMS.

That's one of the reasons it doesn't support things like compound primary keys very well - it turns out you don't really need those for the common CMS subset of functionality.
> Just look at any birthday baloon. They arent spheres.

Yeah, I wondered about that. I guess a birthday balloon is a pretty complicated curve; but I doubt it comes closer to a paraboloid than it does to a sphere or a plane, anywhere on its surface.

But this thing isn't a telescope, it doesn't have to focus an image; it doesn't need to be a parabola, a sphere is fine for achieving highly-directional gain.
I actually still think my analogy is apt.

Their safe is very hard, but once you are in, you are in. And I think I agree with your assessment, they aren’t likely to start creating MAC/RBAC solutions.
How about PureOS?
Of the same site. Perhaps you couldn't be bothered to check. Once again, thank you for proving me correct.
for non-business users, why does OS still matter these days?

I used to be a pure Linux desktop user, for two decades, recently I had to use windows and macos for a few months combined.

In the end, 95% of the time was spent inside a browser, the OS seems non-exist to me for the most part, I now consider myself OS neutral though still prefer Linux when I can choose. Welcome to the cloud era.
We need a law that protects transfer of rights in general. It must become illegal to stop people from selling things they have, from hardware to things like accounts on various platform. Ensuring transferability brings us closer to a free market, which should take care of the problem.
Google local results are mostly dependent on Google maps, where the business owners themselves provide all the information. Kagi can never get those millions of businesses to provide them with that data. Even Apple have a hard time with that. So the option for Kagi is to try to hook in to Google maps. Because business owners anno 2023 refuse to make decent websites for their businesses.
That headline wasn't sensational enough
So, a hardware I've paid an arm and a leg for can be shutdown by the manufacturer. I think, we've give up too much power and become too tolerant of excessive overreach of these giants. I no longer look into future with optimism.
Evolve recently dumped a bunch of partners over the last year. No context why from the outside.
I'm saying that since the 90s this was almost entirely due to one guy. Other leaders from his party (e.g. Ariel Sharon, Ehud Olmert, etc.) didn't take the same approach.
I could run completely in the browser probably but I still consider it a worse experience. I game exclusively on Linux but it isn't for everybody.

Roblox for the kids, and a bunch of hardware my wife uses don’t have Linux software available either.

What is true for you and me is not always true for others.
I can't tell about Mexico situation, but living in France, you can see offers for imported phones (often shipping directly from China or other countries, with large shipping delays) on all platforms like Amazon, Rakuten, Fnac etc. (apart from original ones from vendors/platform themselves).

Usually those imported versions are 10-20% cheaper.

I was always suspicious about those deals and wouldn't buy it myself, spending hundreds of bucks and not being sure if I'm getting the real deal, or some fake / limited version with worse networking etc. but given that they're up year after year, probably many people do buy it.
OMG! How come I never heard of that! Here goes my whole weekend :D
I think I recognize it from somewhere... ah yes, from these videos, you can actually see someone doing the things from scratch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMLA9LRI7Gs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXJXt-KCouQ
N.b., the author is British not American. Argindustry isn’t a uniquely American thing, it’s global and pervasive, specially for protein and animal feedstock. A lot of vegetable in a global context is grown locally and purchased at local markets (outside the US and urban settings globally, which are end to end industrialized), but most people don’t raise artisanal pigs for slaughter. Most people buy their meat from a store or merchant who buys from a middle man who buys from a dense industrialized setup. Even in developing countries dense animal farms are the norm for most meat, even if individuals raise some amount of animal for extra money or protein in their diet. The economics are just too strong. Likewise feedstock tends to be larger plot farming by either large land owners or corporations.

I do not believe you though that people in Madrid and Barcelona and other urban areas of Spain raise their own food in their studio apartments, herding their sheep in their half bath. They buy from supermarkets, or often restaurants, who buy from distributors, who buy from wholesalers, which buy from whoever sells them the food for the cheapest.

What the article gets profoundly wrong is that somehow tourism is driving industrialization of food production. What’s driving industrialization of food production is profit motive and a growing population with enriched tastes and growing wealth that’s outstripping the ability of small farm operations to meet at scale and relatively flat pricing as demand soars. That requires ever increasing supply, which requires ever increasing land productivity with a shrinking farm workforce and shrinking available arable land. The “it’s all the offensive bourgeois food tourists fault” is absurd and talks more to the author seemingly unreasonable social dislike of certain types of people than a level headed economic assessment.
I'm still hearing people (who should know better) say "pixel perfect". Why does such a mistaken concept persist?
I think was is absurd is this premise that youtube has just been hemmorhaging money for google all of its life. Google has never been perfectly forthcoming about their finances on this but most analysis over the years have suggested that this is not some charity product for the world, but a major component of googles profits. Even if it were just that, why start squeezing for pennies when you are at a 1.5 trillion market cap? Why so desperate for a few percentage points more? That move alone should tell investors to decamp and diversify if alphabet feels like they don’t have better strategies than this.
> Today you can run GNU/Linux on a PinePhone

and on a Librem 5 phone.
I'm not going to debate your ignorance and your hate. The proof that Murray supports terrorism is in his own tweets, which are quoted many times here. You are free to remain blind to it, as you are obviously blind to many other things, in service of your hate, which makes you support murderers and rapists. That still doesn't change the facts.
Maybe they finally sync search engines between devices?

edit: No, after 16 years, still can't have custom search engines on all your devices. But hey, at least we can drop images onto PDFs. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444284
How would a free market prevent Samsung from doing this?
> I've heard that public school teachers in the USA generally come from the bottom 20% of their class.

No way this is true. ~57% of teachers have Master's degree or higher. Bottom 20% of their class means they'd barely have enough GPA to graduate, let alone get into a MEd program.

https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ntps/tables/ntps1718_fltable04_t...
This wg-easy?

Definitely not an OSI approved license, but does look like they made an attempt in the spirit of GPL, no?

https://github.com/wg-easy/wg-easy/blob/master/LICENSE.md

> You may:

> - Use this software for yourself;

> - Use this software for a company;

> - Modify this software, as long as you:

> * Publish the changes on GitHub as an open-source & linked fork;

> * Don't remove any links to the original project or donation pages;

> You may not:

> - Use this software in a commercial product without a license from the original author;
It's a modelling tool. Pretty sure there are plenty of users (e.g. artists) who don't care at all about source availability.

And, this is why I say the license is lenient: most freeware creative tools will also try to lay their hands on what you make using them. (e.g., edu versions of modelling/CAD software will also impose restrictions on the files you make using them, meanwhile this doesn't even require attribution let alone restrictions on commercial use of the output)
There's an important difference between metadata owned by a file and metadata that a user/program has attached to a file.

Metadata onwed by a file ought to be embedded in the file's data, so that it will be preserved if you copy the file to a different system. This is the case for images, pdf, mp3 etc.

Metadata attached to a file is useful to simplify many 3rd-party programs, but should generally not be preserved if you copy the file. Stuff like display attributes for Finder, quarantine attributes for the virus scanner, etc.

Each of these requirements deserves a different implementation approach, which is why the current state of affairs makes sense to me.
> +0 + -0 = +0 vs. -0 + +0 = -0

These are not exceptions.

First, I will note that your result above depends on the rounding mode.

Second, IEEE 754 mandates that +0 and -0 are equal (i.e. any equality operator should return True when comparing these two). Therefore both expressions are equal.

NaN has several representations in bits, but they are all "equal" to one another.[1] If an operation gives you NaN, then so will doing it commutatively. It doesn't matter that the underlying bits are the same.

[1] Except for the signaling aspect. But I believe that is preserved in commutative operations.
I think news articles lacking citations is one of more backwards parts of modern news. How is it that Wikipedia is more reliable and neutral than journalists and news?

I think there needs to be a journalistic standard put in place, and all news articles need to be held to that standard. Sort of like passing or failing a health inspection. It should at least include:

1. Citations to other media should be presented inline, like wikipeia, for every claim and every number.

2. Any media (photo, video, etc) should always be presented with metadata about date, place, location, and photographer.
P2P systems were able to deliver dvd rips 15 years ago, and even normies knew how to use them. Cheap, robust, high quality media delivery is a political problem, not a technical one.
I'm afraid Switzerland isn't a safe haven anymore either. People voted yes on a significant extension of police powers allowing FedPol to enforce "anti-terrorist" measures without judicial oversight. Sure those measures can be fought in a federal court, but I wouldnt be surprised if we do bow to other european powers like we did for the Proton mail affair.
That, though, is associativity, not commutativity.

In FP arithmetic, operations are commutative, not associative.
This code based model leaderboard changes somewhat often:
https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/bigcode-models-leaderb...

You will probably have to quantize the model though. Codellama->
https://huggingface.co/codellama/CodeLlama-13b-Instruct-hf

——————-
This is the main leaderboard, changes almost daily, and breaks sometimes.
https://huggingface.co/spaces/bigcode/bigcode-models-leaderb...

Some models are trained specifically for something and coding then some are not. Gotta read the model card / dataset.

According to some other thread on Samantha, I think this one may be trained on coding also but you may have to test it or find the thread on Samantha ver 1.2.
https://huggingface.co/ehartford/samantha-1.2-mistral-7b

Without gpu memory info, idk which would be best for tokens/sec. You want to offload as much as you can to the gpu. 10-15 tokens/sec is okay. Less than that gets annoying.
I would start with a 7b model then move to 11b or 13b once that is up and running.
We need a no-tether law.

If you buy a product you should be able to use it as advertised even if you break all ties with the original vendor. Otherwise it's a service and not a product.
Just proposing the idea is enough to dissuade them from using their products for anything personal. More importantly though, unlike Android it's much harder to use Apple without using cloud, and the cloud is just someone else's computer. Not your computer, not your data. There is also no freedom on iOS to install things you want without permission from Apple.
That's been done dozens of times, we just call them corporate labs instead of universities. And it works fine. There's no reason to care about the university as an institutional form, they just suck in so many ways that are all resolved by proper companies.
BBC celebrates 400 years of Shakespeare's 'First Folio' with ambitious season
You could see this from a mile away with Samsung.

They come up with some slick thing with an uncanny valley feel (Bixby, Knox, One UI) only to reinvent the wheel with it within two or three releases.

They rotated through three separate TV platforms between 2010 and 2015. The former of the two got shutdown ASAP after the transition.

There is no sense of consistency other than their corporate schizophrenia with their products.
I'd love more technical details on how this was possible. What system in the OS/baseband is responsible? If you installed LineageOS could you protect yourself?
Error budgets are to control the workload of the guy who is holding the oncall pager, who otherwise has no say over his or her situation. In recent years companies have shifted to 'you build it you own it' and the infra has been abstracted to the point that the SWE can own the entire thing.

Error budgets also only matter if you either give a shit about your guys or have to pay them for that oncall time. Plenty of employers are happy so say 'salary is exempt, suck it up lol' so errors are effectively free.
Fixing the volume on my Bluetooth earbuds
FWIW, pretty sure it's _also_ intended for the developer (and "admin") to use the admin interface to interact with the database even after the frontend is complete..
I’m sorry but good. A mass resigning or mass exodus from that industry would be good for everyone involved.

Teachers should never have been disciplinarians. Their role is to teach kids. If kids are a behavior problem, the teacher should be allowed to expel/ban them from the classroom. This is the only thing that school administration needs to back teachers on. Education being compulsory for students who don’t want it is an extreme social mistake and one we should remedy as soon as possible. These disruptive students do far more damage to other good students than the benefit they provide if you “try hard” to make them work anyway. Not worth it.

The status quo in America gives teachers far too much power to decide the lifetime earning potential and fate of young students. Teachers are extremely tyrannical and that fact is never brought up at all in education discourse. (not even by the “anti teacher” right wingers)
Gaming in general. Comfort that things work like you're used to. Compatibility with various software.
I've got a Linux and a Mac Partition as well, but in the end I'm just more used to Windows and it works best with all the software I use. Proton is still limited for gaming, the Linux DEs all have drawbacks over windows explorer and macos doesn't even have proton going for it.
It’s a war zone - look at Nagorno-Karabach - tide changes and people move
I’ve read most of the page but I didn’t get what this “not a distro” is and what is its point.
Source? I'm guessing salaries aren't cheap either.
How is Twitter tied into this problem?

The first reporting on the topic was the Al Jazeera English tweet, which used "killed". The second reporting of the topic was the Al Jazeera (Arabic) tweet which included the video and the Arabic word for victim/casualty.

We don't actually know what sources various reports actually used. I would not strongly fault a reporter who found both the AJ English and Arabic tweets and trusted the translation. This story hinges on the difference between "500 killed" and "500 casualties", which is a distinction that many native English speakers aren't good at picking up. I would absolutely believe that a reporter who passed the AJ Arabic tweet through a machine translator would assume the computer made a mistake by choosing "500 victims" when compared to an ostensibly expert-translation from a different media outlet.
Google has astronomical sums of cash and so many hands that the left hand often doesn’t know what the hundreds of right hands know. My point is $2B can be considered a side bet to make sure if their own efforts fail there is a serious competitor to open ai to buy or license by finance people without knowledge of how their own internal modeling efforts are going.
Kagi has a summarizer. It does a decent job on this article.
Google's shareholders own stock. Nothing more nothing less.
I flagged it because debating the number of people killed isn't the point. We know it's in the thousands since Israel started bombing Gaza. Thousands more have been killed since this hospital was bombed. It's a sidetrack (and dare I say engineered distraction) to what's going on.
It is weird that this is so high up in the frontpage yet no one in the comments understands what it is. Hopefully someone from the project team sees this and comes up with an understandable description.
I don’t know where you would go for asylum in his situation? Maybe Hong Kong?
Isn't that the whole premise of capitalism? If one business can't profitably exist (or can no longer exist due to changing market conditions or regulation) then something else will take its place if it's able to deliver the same service for cheaper?
I remember these innocent looking links friends would bait each other into, that autoplayed explicit videos on full volume with 100s of popups and the browser window that kept jumping around as you tried to catch the close button. IE5 (I think), fun times!
Does everything really need to be Docker these days? Specially "network stuff". I mean, it really makes me want to go and grow potatoes instead doing any "IT"
Also, people will just move on to Windows 11 like we did from 95 to 98 to Windows XP