skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Link to photo on Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/WarplanePorn/comments/17gc9xu/first...
Previous discussion on the Author’s post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37917012
> The population density in North American suburbs is too low to allow for children to comfortably walk or bike to their friend's homes, or to third places.

That's just your point of view, a point of view which results in helicopter parenting. When I was a kid I used to ride my bike 5 miles down country lanes into the nearby suburbs to play with my friends. The only rule was that I had to be back by dinner. This sort of thing remains a viable option for kids today, except their parents are too anxious to permit it.

And forget the "the roads are too dangerous now" argument. My elderly parents still walk those same roads with their dog every day. It's fine. They don't use reddit/etc so they aren't pumped full of hyperbolic propaganda about how dangerous walking in America is, and consequently, they're able to enjoy it just fine.
I don't know Django but doesn't model validation apply to the admin screens?
> most systems are more complex

Citation needed. We also have got a _lot_ of mileage out of it over the years.
They (search, social media, advertising companies) are gaining a monopoly on truth. With that they indirectly control the government, which is the one with the monopoly on violence.
Spectrometers don't always make "images", it's possible they didn't take a picture?

Also, that deep field has some amazing gravitational lenses!
If you want more factual answers why not use Bing with ChatGPT?
Infuriating having to watch as a country go to war and a large chunk of people think it's a great idea.

You literally whiteness-ed how the white house manufactured public consent to go to war.

I recall the aluminum tubes that supposedly where for uranium enrichment but were not even close to be what you would need for such a centrifuge. but people believed it.

Also bonkers was Bush and Chaney said before going in. The US cannot wait for final proof "in the form of a mushroom cloud" before taking action against Saddam Hussein, the US president, George Bush, warned overnight.
And interestingly no one seemed to care when it took "tens of thousands" to deceive everyone. Only once that power is handed to all of us does it suddenly become unethical. We could never trust anything we learned except to the extent we trust the person who conveyed the facts to us. The misplaced trust in state and/or corporate media made things kind of work, but that doesn't make it right or ethical. Now that it is obvious that in addition to our benevolent oligarchs, that evil hacker kid your cousin told you about might be feeding you untruths, it doesn't work anymore. Media is pointless, elections are pointless. You can still trust people you see with your eyes on a regular basis to observe the ethics of their behavior. Until they start hacking our eyes, but we have a bit I think? I think this is one more supporting datapoint for a hierarchical representative democracy where people only have to select from people they know well. Dunbar's number makes the math hard, but if most people know 100 people well, that puts elected positions at 1% at the first tier, .01 for the next. Each tier gets to know those they work with, well, electing one to the next level who must be backfilled locally. Not sure how to bootstrap the system.
I think you can can still have those checks as pre_saves in your models
> Whereas with wikipedia, unless a dedicated team of editors who are contracted or liable to vet _every_ change.

A few other Wikipedias including the Turkish one work in that exact manner.
It's simply called using common sense and relying on trusted sources.

"Cryptographic trust" is never going to prove anything. Even if a camera can encrypt a photograph to try to prove a particular photograph was taken at a particular place and time, nothing is preventing someone from spoofing a GPS signal and snapping a photo of a doctored photograph with the camera.

Adulterated content has been around for basically as long as the printing press.
Signing out: more interesting than it looks
That’s a lot of caffeine - doesn’t really change the study but also makes it hard infer anything about 1 cup a day. It’s like 4-5 decent sized cups of coffee worth.

Actually it’s also beyond what the fda recommends. “ For healthy adults, the FDA has cited 400 milligrams a day—that's about four or five cups of coffee—as an amount not generally associated with dangerous, negative effects”

But going to a bit of an extreme makes sense for an early study. If they didn’t see anything with the high caffeine intake, then a low intake would be definitely no noticeable effect. With some effect seen at high doses, now further study should be done.

“ 20 young healthy non-smokers (age: 26.4 ± 4.0 years; body mass index: 22.7 ± 1.4 kg/m2; and habitual caffeine intake: 474.1 ± 107.5 mg/day) in a 10-day caffeine (150 mg × 3 times/day), a 10-day placebo (3 times/day), and a withdrawal condition (9-day caffeine followed by 1-day placebo)”
True enough. I wasn't really saying the characterization is wrong. It's just weird to me to see things like this characterized as "vintage", even if it's just because I've aged.
Sorry Pat, but it's looking like Arm PCs are inevitable
yes, I was thinking of HSA, but they don't seem to be working on it. I think it turned out to be hard, and therefore expensive, and they got distracted by staying alive by developing decent processors.

I think we could argue that tensorflow and/or pytorch has displaced any HSA interest, too. These are programming interfaces that do an OK job of abstracting from the hardware details, and are totally embraced by the most demanding field (AI).
I completely disagree, but I don’t have the energy to argue or explain.
What's your point, exactly? You seem to acknowledge what the person you replied to said but it's somehow "funny".
Well ackthuallllyyy,

The parent comment said "England's king", not "The King of England"
i had the same question, but re mri
They lost most of top talent, it is their people who created OpenAI and Anthropic.
It does but in general there’s less insistence (as compared to Rails, for example) to have “smart models, dumb controllers” - therefore in Django a lot of business logic can end up in the controller and thus doesn’t apply in the admin.

This is a convention though - one could just as easily do it the other way and embed all the business rules in the models.
Heads of state and members of parliament will never get convicted based on this law. They have the funds and the connections to get an amazing defense in court you as a private citizen would never have access to unless you have enough wealth. Many of them have studied law, they know how to mount a defense and they have the money to last a long trial.

This will get used against joe random who cannot mount a proper defense and does not have the same social capital to defend himself.
> Claiming that profs writing bad textbooks is the cause of poor quality in class math instruction is absurd.

It certainly doesn't help. The tendency to pile more and more into standards, and then to have haphazard treatment in the textbooks, with problems that don't make sense... isn't great.

Stick a new teacher in the classroom, and they're going to run their book's recommended pacing and content. And even a veteran is probably going to lean on the book a lot in a pinch.

And, your course needs to fit together with 2 other teachers who are too likely to be running the absurd pacing and content in the courses before and after yours. The rushed pace leaves no choice but to devote a huge fraction of the time to procedural knowledge.

The net result doesn't serve anyone: the top students are left unchallenged and without the context and enrichment that could let them really grow. The bottom students are in painful struggle. And the middle are perpetually slightly confused, learning specific tools that they'll immediately forget when the unit completes.
The thread that inspired the article: https://nitter.cz/suchenzang/status/1701615026648605095
Well that's horrifying, can't wait for Samsung to disable my phone because I went on vacation to Cancun...
That particular part glossed over the details. Commutativity is a property of some groups and not others. It is a property of the "normal" numbers, so we all learn it in school. But there are lots of groups that aren't commutative.
I'm re-reading 1491, which explores what the Americas looked like before colonization – challenging the commonly-held belief that the continent was a giant wilderness. In fact, it shows with compelling evidence, indigenous people for centuries had essentially gardened the landscape. Forests were park like with their openness, managed by skillful controlled burning. Food forage crops selected and cared for.

While I'm a fan of the riotous 'wild' style of gardening, it's as much a design decision as anything, in my opinion. When we were designing our kitchen garden on our farm, we ended up going in a formal direction. I'd been chatting with my brother, a Landscape Architect whose own work is usually more in the tropical/wild aesthetic. And he said, "you know, there's so much 'wild' on your farm already, that something more formal would provide a really nice contrast."

I also love 'zen gardens'. The Portland Japanese garden has been a huge influence on us, and a long time ago I bought a book that goes into depth on each species they use – how they create a 'Japanese Garden' out of PNW native plants and trees.

But the thing I've come to realize over time is that a garden can become, itself, a form of meditation. It's not an end goal so much as something that, through maintaining, you transform yourself. You learn to watch, observe, cultivate patience and acceptance.

One nice aspect of post-modernism is that you can do whatever the f*ck you want. In my opinion, the only thing that really matters is whether you're intentional about it or not.
Partly like this: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8BMFYB9/

But it doesn’t capture the nuance of the feeling.

There was this great unification in America that I haven’t seen since. Everyone shared a common feeling: we were attacked, and we needed to make sure it never happened again.

I was in gradeschool at the time, and I remember my 8th grade teacher turning off the TV because he didn’t feel kids should be watching the towers fall.

Months and years after that, no one questioned that we had to put a stop to terrorism. These were the bad guys, and we were the good guys. Go get ‘em.

I don’t think it’s even possible to replicate the stranglehold that mainstream media had on us. The internet was around, but social media was not. Nowadays you can get contrarian opinions at the speed of light. Back then, you’d be ostracized for voicing that our troops weren’t doing the right thing.

Funny how the same thing is happening now. But it’s way less effective in 2023 than 2003.
This all makes me wonder whatever happened to the neural network based branch prediction in the Exynos?
Maybe that's true, but I honestly haven't seen evidence of it (at least in the big cities I'm familiar with where this claim is sometimes made). I've just seen people who claim that it's the case. From my observations, it appears to be a misunderstanding/miscommuncation that leads to this belief.
I agree with some of these points, but none of them are claims I made in the context of this discussion, so I’m not sure why you’re even arguing about those. It’s irrelevant.
> That might sound silly to a lot of players, because "if the game's not fun, why bother", right?

Games are no different in this regard to books or movies. The bulk of the market is looking for escapist entertainment generally associated with positive emotions, but there are many others that are looking for other things like learning something new or exploring darker emotions. Video games have a unique challenge though in that it's very difficult for those niches to be served with games of the scale and quality of AAA. Movies have that to some extent, but not nearly as extreme.
20 years ago when the Iraq war started I knew ‘elders’ who said it was all fake at the time. And they got this opinion just from watching the news coverage.

What stuck with me was the description that intelligence can support any story as long as you only pay attention to the bits you want. Decades of watching the same dog and pony show lets you see just a little behind the curtain.
At my not Google job we talk about "what happens if a meteor hits a DC".

We agree that that is so rare that as long as there are buttons we can push to recover after a reasonable timeframe that is an acceptable risk, we don't need a fully automatic way to recover from that.

However your SRE teams needs a way to recover without intervention which is why there is talk of backups.

BTW even using different cloud providers isn't enough to avoid a DC outage necessarily. No amount of redundancy can protect you from it beyond a ton of services which intentionally slice off access to the DC leading to the risk of that happening accidentally which is its own risk.
It’s described in various articles as $121bn of cash, cash equivalents (debt instruments and marketable securities with maturities of < 90 days) and other short-term investments (which I think includes government bonds.) Short term investments make up more than 80% of it.
I can't wait until this Browser-on-JS/WASM-on-Canvas loads an IFrame from a site that also has its own Browser-on-JS/WASM-on-Canvas.

Hell, the inner IFrame is probably going to get around IFrame recursion and domain rules too.

We're going to eventually end up with IFrame fork bombs, and IFrame topologies that cannot be meaningfully mapped to Euclidean space (amongst all the other privacy, user control, etc. concerns, of course).
have they? I haven't noticed it in recent years.

it seems like everyone settles for ugly, barely usable interfaces like CUDA, OpenCL, and then scabs them over with a higher-level interface like tensorflow.
Looks like Google has better hardware for AI than anyone else, and they are the only company having both AI research and AI hardware. OpenAI+Microsoft and Anthropic+Amazon are much less integrated, working at arms length.

> Google will have multiple very large clusters across their infrastructure for training and by far the lowest cost per inference, but this won’t automatically grant them the keys to the kingdom. If the battle is just access to compute resources, Google would crush both OpenAI and Anthropic.

> Being “GPU-rich” alone does not mean the battle is over. Google will have multiple different clusters larger than their competitors, so they can afford to make mistakes with pretraining and trying more differing architectures. What OpenAI and Anthropic lack in compute, they have to make up in research efficiency, focus, and execution.

https://www.semianalysis.com/p/amazon-anthropic-poison-pill-...
Was expecting to see Maxwell’s equations and an actual model of MagSafes magnetism.

This is more or less an exploded diagram.
Admin for Symfony Framework ( PHP )

https://symfony.com/bundles/EasyAdminBundle/current/index.ht...

Admin for Laravel (PHP)
https://nova.laravel.com/

Java Spring Boot
https://docs.spring-boot-admin.com/current/getting-started.h...

I think many other Frameworks have this, did you search for it?
The paper that OP linked to is indeed about hardware transactional memory, but STM is a variation of transactional memory that is implemented entirely in software.
Both perception of risk and tolerance of risk.
So the internal effort to build a competitive AI product are going well?
It used to not be IIRC. This was over a decade ago, so my information is likely outdated, but it might explain why other languages chose not to implement it. Further, a model may be valid, but make no sense to an application. For example, a car may have 6 wheels and still be a car ... but might be out-of-bounds for a simulation expecting 4 wheels.
The key words here are "brute force" -- there might be some [possibly quantum] techniques around it, but probabilities around guessing and checking an arbitrary number remain constant.
It isn't really. There have been plenty of innovations in parallel computing:

* Go, with goroutines and heavy use of channels.

* Rust which is free of data races and generally improves the safety of multithreaded programming via Sync, Send and just safer APIs (e.g. Mutex).

* Chapel, which is a language designed primarily for multithreaded and multiprocess computing.

Those are just the ones I know about. There's obviously way more.
Illegal Hunting in China Threatens Wildlife and Public Health
Don't forget about the allegations of Iraq killing babies in hospitals, corroborated by eyewitness testimony to Congress.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
It’s only censorship if you stop other people reading/consuming the censored content.

Choosing to block ads is more like choosing to not read a book. Or skipping a boring chapter to get to the action.
No doubt. But ranking math skills, being especially consistent in studies/homework is maybe number 5. The problem I am pointing out is math teachers often only have that 1.
From reading the article I'm not that shocked that people aren't having her back and that they're not broadcasting her views, if her own description of her behaviour makes her sound this abrasive how did other people perceive her?
There's also another type of magnetic viewing film that doesn't seem to use oil filled capsules with flakes of metal in.

This is a picture I just took, it doesn't really do it justice but you can get rainbow like effects from it -
https://www.anfractuosity.com/files/mag2.jpg

This is the same film with a special type of cylindrical magnet below -
https://www.anfractuosity.com/files/mag1.jpg

Edit: It seems to be this -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetochromism
it seems to use encapsulated iron oxide nanoparticles in water in a film
The Spring one linked above is not really comparable to Django admin in my opinion. In particular it doesn’t integrate with your data model at all - it essentially just shows actuator endpoints.
Spotify to change royalty model, including minimum stream count for payment
What declassified Cold-War spy photos tell us about ancient Rome
if your model is a choicefield, then it only shows you those values and you can’t do what you are describing. Additionally, you have validation that can happen at the class level, group of fields, or field.
So now the government gets to gatekeep every website deemed controversial? That's quite the slippery slope.
No, it just makes it cheaper. There is no further well poisoning. "Deep fakes" have been possible since the camera was invented. Hopefully people will realize that you are not trusting the photo, but the photographer.

Democratizing propaganda is a good thing. Now you wont need deep pockets to fake stuff.
It's hard to do well, especially if the framework isn't built from the ground-up to meaningfully model database schemas. It basically involves creating a CMS which is a project in of itself. Do you stop at building Django or do you keep going until you have created Wagtail? There's a ton of value in it, but it's tough.
Exactly. If one wants to make the point that people are mixing up 15MC with ULEZ and other traffic-restricting measures, sure, any pertinent point of fact is welcome. But instead there's been a fairly transparent attempt to take advantage of a contemporary political moral panic, and go with the lazy option of insinuating that anyone with fairly pedestrian (heh) objections to current council and government policy is a dangerous QAnon alt-right anti-vaccine... whatever other completely unrelated folk devils you want to throw in. Politicians have realized that they can drag the most random topics into the "culture war", declare that disagreeing with them is a "conspiracy theory", and enjoy free repetition of that thought-terminating cliché by allegedly "anti-establishment" journalists desperate to find a new frontier to declare their moral superiority in

And for the record, I tend to agree with the majority of the proposals anyway, but I can still object to the extremely bad faith response to locals exercizing their democratic right to question them. And confused at the number of people who will openly say "fuck cars" and explicitly advocate for making driving more difficult (as a primary goal), then claim it's a conspiracy to say they ever supported that
I thought about upgrading my farm truck and the sticker shock got me too. I'll stick with my old truck for a while longer.

On the other hand, the amortized yearly cost of the truck I have is basically nothing. It is not surprising that there was room for the price to go up.
Ok, how complex are _your_ systems? Simple table views are available through a number of database management software (dbeaver). What does django provide beyond that?
It's hard to automatically generate a useful admin dashboard like this in a framework that's not oriented around crud apps with certain assumptions baked in.

Most frameworks/platforms that are oriented around crud apps, where the framework itself does have a concept of models, do have some sort of admin dashboard feature.

Flask is a microframework that doesn't make assumptions about any database/models, so it's impossible for it to do something like this.

However, there is arguably a limited range of apps where an automatically generated admin dashboard is going to be useful anyway.
If anything, in my eyes it's exactly because programming languages matter is the reason why we should have less of them. We should start folding some languages inside others. (Or abandon them.)

As a counterpoint, the programming industry is vast, so the opportunity cost of using tools that are not as good as they could be is also very high. If we don’t continue to explore new possibilities, how will we make those tools better? How can we learn what is worth keeping, what to combine, what to abandon?

I believe there is huge potential in finding better programming languages and better programming models for them to describe. We are still at the stage where we are worrying about whether our programs are even behaving correctly. Sometimes we get as far as worrying about performance. There is a lot of talk about productivity but it is relatively rare that we consider language design as a way of expressing our ideas more efficiently or making it easier for someone else to understand them later.

If we look at languages like Haskell or Erlang or Rust, these have certainly been used professionally, but in the long term their most important contribution might be the ideas they introduced to wider audiences rather than anything written in those languages themselves.