skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not necessarily. Part of playing is you can play by the rules you want to play. I consider that part of winning.

Or, if you want to step back and be more expansive: discard the outcome; it's part of playing well.

> The idea that you need to “succeed” or “win” itself is something others told you.

Not for me. I don't do things because others told me. I do them because I choose. Whatever I choose-winning, succeeding or whatever--it's a self-directed expression of me. I'm self-directed.

I get if it's different for you. It certainly can be like that. It can be used to manipulate.

Indeed power can be coercive and deceptive. It can be the frame, that looks desirous, or acceptable, but is actually disempowering for those who may choose to participate.

Such as "FS" ideology: seems noble, but can be misused. Such as to convince creators that it's noble that they shouldn't charge, in order to keep software cost-free.

I agree with you about the hidden power of platforms, institutions and systems. It's important for persons to be aware of these powers if they are to navigate them.

I understand the integrity of not playing with the "swindler", in this case the "signature vendor". However, that choice may become idealistic when practically your customers are prevented from having an easy install process because you are too ethical to "play" with, or pay, the "swindler".

Whether something is a swindle can depend on some point of view. The utility of creator verification is undeniable and is of benefit to users of the platform, system, institution. However, the precise value of that utility and benefit is harder to pin down, unlikely to be what the market currently charges and most probably exaggerated.

In short, looked at from one way, a costly convenience is a swindle, but from a more practical viewpoint, it's merely a cost of doing business.

And in many ways, you can choose what you care about. Pick your battles. Stand at the gate and fight the gatekeeper because of the high cover charge? Or get in side and fight the market? Choice is yours. Keep in mind that self-imposed exile of such puritanism could be used as an excuse to avoid the possible failure of real competition. It may be you think you are free, but in fact perhaps you're just afraid to fail. So, instead, you pick a fight with the doorman, so you never have to get inside and really get tested.

In conclusion, a refusal to be intimate with any swindles at all could be seen as a form of puritanism, the cost of which may be a kind of "modern exile". And I don't think it's easy to get deliveries of cucumbers to your off-grid shack in the woods! You could grow your own tho, but you'd still kind of be a modern exile, tho! Hahaha :)
If the sequence is from an external source or reference, then the individual key presses are not a result of your free choices.
human-driven cars kill people all the time too. and the stock thing from 2010 isn't AI, just algorithmic trading.

not the most convincing of arguments
Extending the Laws of Thermodynamics for Arbitrary Autonomous Quantum Systems
It’s pre-recorded so they don’t have to censor the audience’s boo
And if you compare to a single ultra wide display? I have a Thunderbolt one with USB ports that charges laptops and serves as a hub. All the portability benefits of a laptop that can be taken and used to work elsewhere, with the comfort of a big screen and fixed set up.
Anyone care to summarize what lead up to this?
I actually got the idea for this article when somebody commented on my Apple Animation APIs piece with the same sentiment :)
Apple fanboys's gonna apple fanboy
> So "noticing" this pattern seems to rely on being all-knowing?

No. It relies on you being able to distinguish between an (your) opinion and an (your) identity.

The identity part is the precarious one, i.e. you defending a stance blindly without questioning it because you feel your identity is in danger.

This pattern being present doesn't mean that there can't be an underlying truth in what's asserted. In fact, that is what makes the assertion meaningful in the first place. However, it entailing a partial truth doesn't mean that the entire assertion holds true in the context it's presented in. Example: "AI" might ultimately be dangerous (like any other technology can be), but this assertion's primary goal is to make you behave a certain way where it is unclear how that would contribute more towards mitigating the danger than to empower the asserter.

To fix this, take a step back before accepting something blindly. Train yourself not to be reactive.
> the acquisition is conditional upon the satisfactory upgrade of the TVGuide.co.uk website as part of the platform redevelopment. Digitalbox will pay £0.02 million on immediately on exchange to trigger the platform redevelopment
Hopefully the first of many, so that security starts be taken seriously across all phases from software development.
It's also a fun party trick that can be done at home to impress guests, and it's not particularly hard to do.

All you need is a hot pan, some liquor with high alcohol content, and a long bbq lighter. Pour a small amount of alcohol into the pan and light it up from the side, obviously being mindful of your surroundings and keeping the pan horizontal as not to spill the burning alcohol.
covid a great recent example of this
Apple have stated that the M3 is the same performance as the M2.

They will probably have quite the efficiency advantage though.
Nice that it works in other languages too. It seems useful for finding how words/expressions are used in real conversations. I don't care much about pronunciation, but I want to find context for the (French) words I run into. I am learning French and I use a website with a similar idea: https://www.linguee.fr. It lets you search for usage of words and shows them in professionally translated context.

PS. Just realized the '...' icon on the transcript frame opens another frame with a scrolling transcript. Very neat!
Mind your own business next time, we need the money here over the pond :P
In film school we had this super kind dude who was generally very popular among our class (I liked him a lot too). He would always get raving reviewers in our critique and criticism (C&C) class. Frankly, I always found his work to be very mediocre but he was just such a sweet guy nobody gave him any straight feedback. One day he brought in a film to our C&C class that was so poorly white balanced I couldn't not say something. So I stuck up my hand and told him "the white balance is so poorly executed on this everyone looks like they're suffering from a severe case of jaundice. It's all I can focus on and it's not helping your film". I think it was the first time he had gotten direct feedback and he started to cry and left the room. Boy did I ever get it from the rest of the class. People really laid into me, folks wouldn't talk to me for a week after etc. It was so annoying because everyone loved him and nobody wanted to hurt his feelings. After I went to see our C&C class prof for a 1:1 and I explained the situation, he said in your career you're going to have to give a lot of feedback, and it's going to be hard to know how everyone will react to it. Some people will start a war, some people will improve, but to tilt it the scale against war... always start by finding something good and talking about that first. I've used that advice going forward and I suspect it's served me well.
I asked chatgpt to fix it:

```
Intwoduction

this cowwection of thoughts on softwawe devewopment gathewed by gwug bwain devewopew

gwug bwain devewopew not so smawt, but gwug bwain devewopew pwogwam many wong yeaw and weawn some things awthough mostwy stiww confused

gwug bwain devewopew twy cowwect weawns into smaww, easiwy digestibwe and funny page, not onwy fow you, the young gwug, but awso fow him because as gwug bwain devewopew get owdew he fowget impowtant things, wike what had fow bweakfast or if put pants on

big bwained devewopews awe many, and some not expected to wike this, make souw face

THINK they awe big bwained devewopews many, many mowe, and mowe even definitewy pwobabwy maybe not wike this, many souw face (such is intewnet)
```
I've just finished writing an article on hardware required for LLM's in production https://bionic-gpt.com/blog/llm-hardware/

Would be interesting to see how this performed running Llama 2 7b.
That's the first thing anyone has ever said about Go that makes me want to learn the language. That sounds like an ideal programming language.
Supposedly macOS learns about your use and applies charging rules appropriately. I haven't seen it actually work in practice though, unlike Windows 11 of all things that asked me "You seem to be using this laptop mostly while connected to power, do you want to limit charging to 60% or 80% to preserve battery life?" And reminds me every month that's the case and that it can be disabled.
Dudes like this have been painting mediocre portraits for tourists in NYC forever. This dude is just the first to effectively use social media to promote his otherwise forgettable illustrations.

If he can toughen up (or shrug it off) and continue to develop as a human and an artist – and manage to hold on to his sizable audience while he's doing it – he could make his mark.
It's free speech until it isn't, the feds went after it because it was used for money laundering. With money laundering issues in particular, this free speech thing gets tossed out of the window.

Tornado's creators should've seen this coming. Thinking that "free speech" would stand in the way of IRS getting mad and shutting it down is delusional.
Thank you for your comments!

I certainly don't pretend to be an expert in this, so the notes are very appreciated.
None of them - capitalist or not, they all had it at that time, and many continue to have it to this day as seen with Ghana and the Ivory Coast. So capitalism doesn’t end child labor, which is my point. It can even expand it or worsen conditions where doing so is profitable.
I second this but I will say that the complexity demon lives in the reflect package.
The coasts tend to have lots, e.g. New England and along California SR 1.
You're entirely right - the article really should read "Mac CPU Architecture", but then nobody would have clicked on it
Ooh - let me guess... It's a stainless screw in a stainless thread and has suffered spalling?

Spalling is a really wierd effect that only happens with screws and threads made of stainless steel. You can tighten a screw with your fingers (no tools, just finger tightened), and then try to undo it and it'll suddenly be stuck. You try with tools, and it's still stuck. You use a lot of force, and it snaps off!

It happens because stainless steel can act a little like animal fur - rub in one direction and it slides easily, while when you change direction the fur meshes and refuses to move at all.

Doesn't happen reliably either - you can have 100 identical screws in 100 identical holes, and perhaps 5% will get stuck.

Normally the fix is to put vaseline or some other lubricant on the screws (before it gets stuck - after it's stuck you're sol), but I figure the NASA team doesn't want that lubricant contaminating their sample.
I went all out and got a Synology DS1621+ with 5 14TB drives. I don't really do photo and/or video editing so I'm not sure what the requirements for that are. I access it through Immich but I've also got a few shares mounted through NFS which is very fast imo.
I have 1 of these for work and 1 for home. I'm waiting 5 years from release, so about 2024-2025. Computers got really good around 2017, and the only reason to upgrade is the heat and fan. I use remote VMs anyways, so chrome is really my limiter.
That’s honestly just not how Apple hardware resale value has ever worked. The new M3 hardware could double the performance of the previous generation and they would only drop in price by maybe a few hundred.
I would go so far as to say "no matter what a company says, your data is not safe with them."
> If someone has alternatives

If you want notebooks with 128 GB memory, you want to look at the highest-end workstations.

Dell Precision 7680 and 7780 (comes with new CAMM memory form factor)

HP ZBook Fury 16 G10

Both of these have options for up to 128 GB (ECC) memory.
What's New in SQLite 3.44
That’s a very optimistic view of group dynamics. And one easily disproven by the following of one Donald T.

Much more likely is that after a few cycles those still involved have made it part of their identity.
Frankly, I tried to go into depth on this because it was really interesting. I am embarrassed to say it was tough to find sources outside Quora and Reddit. It's possible this HackerNews comment parent might become the canonical source :)
This is Chromebook's main market, so although I doubt it's "most", it's definitely more popular and useful than iMacs. So much so that there were rumours of Apppe doing a Chromebook-imitation cheap Macbook for that market because if they're not on ramping kids into their ecosystem, years down the line those grownups will have few reasons to try to enter it.
Trump supporters indicate otherwise.
This is really interesting in terms of mitigating trusting trust attacks.
Running LLama 2 70b a Mac Studio gets 13 tokens per second.

2 x 4090 is more like 38 tokens per second.

But it's harder than that. As the 2 x 4090 is using https://llm.mlc.ai/ which is highly optimized so perhaps the Mac Studio inference could be better when tuned.

Then a lot of production inference engines use continous batching, which means they perform really well when processing multiple prompts at a time.
Much appreciated, I wasn't alive at the time so missed the WWDC memo :)

(You won't believe how I pronounce OS X)
Yup, but it goes both ways. I end up over-eningeering as some feeble attempt to avoid technical debt, only to realise my over-eningeering /is/ the technical debt. Or I end up with relatively simplistic / specialised code that needs an entire rewrite and migration process any time something is added. Either way, it's a bunch of rewritten code mixed with paralysing anxiety about writing bad code.
Show HN: GPT-powered grammar checker for better tweets
Hey HN,

I'm a solo developer from Ukraine, steadily growing my Twitter profile every day.
I noticed I was caught in a repetitive cycle: writing a post, inputting it into Chat GPT, directing it to check the grammar, and manually selecting the necessary part...

That's why I created the GrammarBot app to help non-native speakers tweet more efficiently. It checks the grammar of your input messages and with just a click, it can rewrite or transform the writing style.

App link - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/grammarbot-write-like-a-pro/id...

I would love to hear your feedback.

Best regards, Evhen
Many suffer from normalcy bias. Too scientists are not excluded. It's psychological more than rational. It's when you need to find ways to deny something scary exists and is coming.
It really, really was. I’d been used to barely-noticeable performance gains for a decade or more. The responsiveness under load of the M1s made them feel like a decade of performance improvements overnight.
I don't think it applies here, but it helps to praise in public and criticise in private. You must give people every opportunity to save face.

It's also good to tone down your criticism and pick the right words. Directness does not work well in every situation.
iPhone 15 Pro NPU can do 35 TOPS. M3 can only do 18 TOPS. That's why they didn't focus on ML in the video.
Maybe I'm old, but I can't see any reasons why this is better after looking at the before/after example. This is adding unnecessary complexity with very little benefit (if at all).

If anything, the "try...catch" example actually look clearer and better than "!user.ok".
So, who do you contact about that violation?
Depends on what they're doing with the machine. For casual use, Intel is perfectly fine and you do get some x86 benefits too. I have M1 Pro for work, personal M2 mac mini and typing this on 16" Intel MBP, watched the presentation live and still not convinced I need to upgrade my casual browsing and light programing machine this year. Battery is at 500 cycles and 84% health, still lasts 4 hours.
Earlier submission:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38078063

(483 points/6 hours ago/590 comments)
Apple's New MacBooks with M3 Chips Offer Up to 22 Hours of Battery Life
grug sad. grug make complexity demon more power. grug look at code. complexity demon look back. grug raises club.
grug factor.
complexity demon no more.
grug tired. grug sleep.
Your favorite forum/blog/app might be ad driven.

And it’s not like ads will disappear; if anything, we’ll get AI ads.
The E.O. also requires that a model be reported if it:

> was trained using a quantity of computing power greater than 10^26 integer or floating-point operations, or using primarily biological sequence data and using a quantity of computing power greater than 10^23 integer or floating-point operations

However later it also says that reported is needed for, "Companies developing or demonstrating an intent to develop".

If I start training a CNN on an endless loop, do I become subject to these reporting requirements?

Also the fops requirement is not that high. An H100 does 3,958 fp8 flops. So it would take,

> >>> (10 * 23) / (3958 * (10 * 12)) / 86400
> 292.422

292 days until you have a regulated model.
Finally, a business model!
The typography plugin which comes out of tailwind gives a clean readable experience in my opinion. https://tailwindcss.com/docs/typography-plugin
Earlier submission (about M3 chip):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38078063

(483 points/6 hours ago/590 comments)
That's cool. I use some 4 tb silicon power brand drives. I didn't research them much. Prices are definitely going to fall soon on 8 tb, and I'll likely retrofit things pretty quickly with those.
I doubt the victims are. Its those people wandering through parks having this fantasy of victimisation to drive their 'compassionate' impulse to police others.

If you wander around the world engaged in these fantasies, and police everyone around you such, then you're creating a nightmare for people to live in.

Do you imagine teenagers attacking people, and then keep them out of parks? They're vastly more dangerous than dogs.

Do you imagine so for everything? For knives and forks? For trees? Why! Trees do fall and kill people, we must be ever vigilant for the person with a tree on their property who has not put signs up warning people.

Yes, the world has some minimal danger to it; and people are routinely injured one way or another. If you spend your life in fantasies of this danger you'll only make the world doubly unbearable -- as unsafe as it ever was, and now with self-appointed social police making sure no one can enjoy it

If there's a dangerous dog in a park, that's a problem -- and call the police; make laws against it; make it a crime to own a dangerous dog.

But if there isnt, if you're just having this fantasy that some random guy walking some random dog is endangering the people in the park -- well, I dislike you much more than I dislike that dog. And I'd like a sign to keep you out of the park.

But people who make signs arent the kind to make that one; they're the busy-bodies.
Apple Unveils New Space Black MacBook Pro for M3 Pro and M3 Max (BlackBook?)
>My DNA isn't some terrible secret I have to hide in the dark.

.....please get back to us on how that opinion ages once your insurance companies get ahold of the data.
...yet if any other provider sent these messages then Google would block the entire domain.

I doubt Google would do that to other big companies.

Some accept user-provided email addresses at face value, without any confirmation, and then refuse to stop spamming you.

Would Google block Paypal?
So a monad.

Btw zig also does this in a nice way IMO. You declare possible error enums and the returned value is a union of all the errors or the success type. You then use existing union handling at each call site
Yes, that's what we do. We have the one-click through the client at the top, and the link at the bottom takes you to a more robust "preference center" that combines preferences from multiple systems (marketing, sales, product, etc).

That doesn't stop people from sending in a spate of complaint emails every single day. But this is kind of the local minimum we have found and no one really wants to mess with it at this point.
I agree, actually in reading the original review by Ben and I think it was a very fair and balanced bit, heck it's hardly even an art review I found it's a social commentary more generally.

Just the whole situation spurred that thought about feedback and criticism, and how you never know how people will react - so I thought I'd share it.
2019 16"cher here too. These are great machines just eclipsed by all the Apple silicon hype. Yes they suck comparing to performance, power use and heat to Apple silicon, they're still amazing x86 laptops compared to whatever other x86 machines are out there.
I started to walk 3 miles a day 3 years ago. I lost 80lbs.

Do this and then think about what you eat next. Measure progress in months and years, not days and weeks.
big brain is not use brain make brain read grug.
it's really not. just a made up one on your side.
Promises already are a wrapper that can contain an error or a value, and using 'await' is basically unwrapping it.

This library adds very little value and is just another layer of abstraction which removes the syntactic sugar that was added with the previous layer and tries to re-implement stuff we already have (like responding to uncaught errors).

Just use base promises and .then/.catch etc if you want to deal with values/errors this way. Don't introduce another dependency that does almost nothing, and which others reading your code will have to familiarize themselves with.

I get that this makes doing some things slightly more ergonomic and less verbose, but at the end of the day it saves you seconds while costing others who have to look up documentation/code of yet another library much more time. Not to mention yet another dependency with sub-dependencies you have to manage. It wants specifically rxjs ^7.8.1 despite only using stable parts of that API.

I probably just spent more time evaluating this thing than it ever would have saved me.
Please provide some stream urls for educational purposes.
>sad but true: learn "yes" then learn blame other grugs when fail, ideal career advice

grug speak only true
Alternatively, flambéer or flambé-er, since by the time you're using "flambé" as a present-tense verb you're already in mangled culinary-loanword territory.
Lol, it worked again

Seems like substack = good, medium = bad
I can't tell if this is satire. Big pharma is going to cure my Huntington's, and they're even tell me about it before I start to lose mobility? What's the catch?
Yeah have a 64Gb dell here (precision 7670)
This is an irrational reason. When you click “mark as spam” the sender can configure the email so your email provider notifies them that you marked it as spam. (See email feedback loop).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback_loop_(email)

Further, pixels can be embedded in the email so they can see when you open the email and how many times.

The sender has every incentive to properly handle unsubscribe to avoid spam traps. If you get big enough, users WILL come sign up for your service with a known spam trap email. If your operations are as sloppy as you’re suggesting, your email sending capabilities go poof.
Do you own a pit bull by any chance?
Your missed u from you're and could merged into labor.

:thumbs_up: