skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Intel had in development a "rugged NUC" with the Atom-branded equivalent of the Intel N100 CPU, which supported ECC and which was expected to have a low price.

Unfortunately, I assume that this product has been canceled a few months ago, when Intel sold their NUC business to ASUS.

There are a few small computers that support ECC and which use obsolete Intel Tiger Lake or Tremont-core-based Intel Elkhart Lake CPUs, but those CPUs are a dead end, being slow and supporting instruction sets that are different from the current mainline Intel CPUs, so I would not recommend any of them.

The best remaining choice depends on which is more important, the size and the power consumption or the price of the server.

For very small size and low power consumption I am not aware of any good solution at a reasonable price, because even when some of the Arm CPU SoCs or Intel or AMD mobile CPUs support ECC, I have not seen any such computer board that includes the ECC support. There are some industrial computers with ECC, but those are expensive for what they offer.

If only the cost is the problem, and second-hand servers are avoided because the server to be bought is intended to be used for many years, then a server with desktop Intel or AMD CPUs must be used. The MBs with the Intel W480 chipset are expensive, so the cheapest solution is to use one of the AM5 MBs that specify ECC memory support, e.g. from ASUS or ASRock Rack, together with one of the cheaper Ryzen 7000.

Another option is an older AM4 MB, like the Mini-ITX ASRock Rack X570D4I-2T ($400 due to including dual 10 Gb/s Ethernet ports), which has the advantage of using cheaper older Ryzen 5000 CPUs, with cheaper DDR4 ECC memory, so the total system cost would be reasonable.

The only disadvantage of the desktop Ryzen CPUs when used as servers is that, even if they have excellent energy efficiency when they are actually running programs, they have a relatively high idle power consumption, because only the cores are shut down when doing nothing, while the I/O die has a permanent consumption around 20 W or more. Therefore one must choose between the low idle power consumption of a few watts of the laptop CPUs and the ECC memory support of the desktop CPUs.

Because in my home lab most servers alternate between times when they are used intensively with times when they stay idle for hours or days, except for one server that is connected permanently to the Internet, all the others are used with Wake-on-LAN, so they are shut down when idle, for negligible power consumption.
I could be mistaken but I think whether the http request makes anything ‘available by transmission’ is down to the definition of who is the data controller and which data processors exist. So in the case of telemetry where no PII changes hands, and no PII is stored, then I can’t see how it applies. That is, assuming that the Telemetry backend here belongs to the same entity that made the app. Such as if a microsoft product phones home to its own backend.

Apps that make http requests to other endpoints belonging to third parties are much murkier.

As far as consent is concerned: Whether consent is required for making a http request containing an IP in the header based on legitimate interest is also murky. Consent is only one way of permitting the processing. Whether Telemetry is legitimate interest I don’t think is established. But it’s important to remember that not only “absolutely essential” functionality that is a legitimate interest. That is: something isn’t automatically not legitimate because it could be removed and still deliver the functionality to the user. Online ads are contested (because profit can be a legitimate interest). The same for telemetry. It’s certainly of interest to the developer to get the data. I have not seen any rulings yet on that but Microsoft has made a pretty decent legal analysis when they conclude that they will never need consent here.

A web server owner can even store data for some time since preventing denial of service attacks could mean they need to store IPs for a short while before deleting. As that’s a legitimate interest, this would not require user consent from visitors.
Great start. Please develop a plugin I can secretly add to my Mother's browser to dial down the outrage she reads on the fly! She'll notice 'redacted' ;)
Curious why you'd think rails isn't an option?
Agreed, if you compare the "Open Source Definition" and the FSF software freedom principles, they are basically the same. I'd say there has been pressure to try and separate the definitions and equate "open source" with "source available". And like you say, there are ongoing "attacks" trying to get around gpl style licensing.
how is this even implemented? Is it a custom extension?

Too bad Edge is closed source, with Chromium one can at least find places in the source code where strange things are done for specific domains
I have API access using AWS Bedrock which is hosted claude v2. boto3 has a client to trigger the completions but I've been practicing using just the playground in AWS console.
The normal reasons for a cat to be ingest plant matter are:

- because you mixed it with something they do eat. For example, onions in gravy. Onions are very toxic to cats but they are unlikely to eat a raw one. A nice beef or chicken gravy however, is much more palatable.

- because extracts are dissolved in a liquid, and the cat gets that on their fur, which they then lick. Example: Aloe Vera scent spray.
Re 3) FYI this is a relatively US/UK centric approach. In most of the countries I lived in, besides the UK, the bias was against violence, in this context.

Edit: there was an IG account posting solely picture of nipples, male and female, cropped so it was hard to ascertain the sex of the photographed person.

It existed purely to mess with the IG censorship rules. I don’t recall the name of the account but I think it was a genius idea.
As baby boomers retire, German businesses turn to robots
Functional programmers regularly claim:

-Haskell is faster than C (lol)

-FP gives you free concurrency

-FP makes code more testable

-FP is easier to read

-FP is easier to consume for people

-FP results in no bugs

-FP is easier to change

-FP will literally suck your peepee

-Actually FP is the second coming for Christ

It’s really funny how you also pretend you’ve never heard of all the silver bullet claims that are incessantly plaguing every programming forum.

What’s also really funny is your multiple alt accounts manipulating your votes. You must be real secure in those those claims.
Color accuracy, uniformity, and lighting up the whole room with the built in backlight, would be some reasons.
I'm sorry, "unexpected"? Did no one in the team at the New York Times understand what was meant by the term "post-truth world"? People on this site alone were talking about how the advancement of AI tools would make the idea of video evidence of crimes obsolete years ago! Anyone who's been paying the slightest bit of attention to the capabilities of these tools and their immediate, obvious consequences has been anticipating this for a long time. Even the very idea of video and photographic evidence being fakable is going to result in people rejecting it when it conflicts with their narratives. And it's hard to fault them; we're living in Descartes' world now.
If you're referring to the Tensor SoCs, no they're not using custom ARM cores. They're using the reference Cortex codes from ARM because Tensor is pretty similar to the Exynos.
Why require an API in the cloud? Wouldn't that simplify and reduce the exposure to the business?

Why not allow people to securely talk to the IOT device right on the local network? I think that then really puts a bright line on where the liability lays.
I’m not saying your experience is wrong, but for my use case (code, mainly), I’ve found Claude to be far more reliable (not to mention faster) than GPT4.
I’m not sure how this would happen, if your case fits the phone correctly. When I put a MagSafe case on my phone, I get an animation showing that it fit. Subsequent attachment of MagSafe components just need to align with the case, since the case is already aligned with the phone.
Wow, your regiment is really awesome. I also work from home, but soon will have to start working from the office.

I will take your list seriously and will try to accomplish whatever I can. I'll try to add running.

At what time do you wake up?
Both are important. I replied to a comment about commutativity, so I focused on that.
I never claimed middleware doesn't work when self hosting. I claimed that it's not as useful as it could be, because your company has prioritized edge deployments over supporting self-hosting.

As someone in that discussion rightfully says: "We are grown-ups with access to the same tracing and profiling tools as you. There is nothing dangerous about us using Node.js as far as I’m concerned."

Additionally, your comment just reeks of PR to me. I don't know if you do it on purpose or what, but to read my comment and then come back with "Middleware works when self hosting"... it has to be intentional on your part to misunderstand my comment that badly.
Okay I'll take a look, thanks for suggesting. : ) (I'm male)
Just FYI: Swift has actor model. Pony is built around actor model.
This is supercool! I'll work through it later when I have some free time.

I've always wanted to setup an interactive blog like this or Bartosz Ciechanowski's. Are you willing to describe your stack? I put something together with django & bootstrap once, but even that was more overhead than I liked.
I believe John Chowning discovered FM synthesis (basis of Yamaha DX family) via one of the MUSIC programs, but I don't have a link to the interview on hand.

Here's another cultural footprint of MUSIC N though:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=H5pKsKgOCbU

Got a shoutout from Bonzi Buddy, and some obscure movie I guess.
> Isn't that lack of independent mobility largely caused by car-centric urban planning?

Thats not much if an issue in Europe. Here the problem is the risk of violence and crime. Particularity in western europe, walking alone at night is risky even as an adult. For kids it would be equally risky during the day.
I’m not trying to victim blame but why not fork and fix the bug? Isn’t that the point of open source? If you’re not paying for support then I feel you should set expectations accordingly. Do they offer any kind of sla or some other guarantee on responding to an issue?

(I work in enterprise stacks where there’s a hard contract that defines these things so maybe biased)
My cat doesn't, although it usually eats very small amounts
In any other context, having an AI interpret websites and decide what you should and shouldn't be allowed to read, even based on "subtle" language (which one assumes the AI would need to rewrite,) would be considered the grossest form of censorship. It's far beyond what Twitter and other social media platforms have been accused of simply by using algorithmic feeds and people want to burn them to the ground.

I'm not against ad-blocking but this seems a bit too Big Brother-ish.
A lot of large scale email providers are making it more and more difficult to run your own email infrastructure without also owning/controlling the IP range in which your sending servers are issued their IPs.

I understand the logic, but most of us don’t have control of the IP allocations in which our email servers sit.

Proofpoint was the one that got me to move to Fastmail. They had filtered the entire IP allocation in which my mail server sat at a major cloud provider. Their stance was I could either use whatever email service that provider had, demonstrate control over the entire IP range (just to de-list one IP), or move my server to another IP that wasn’t filtered.

I understand the logic to an extent, but those of us who have enjoyed running our own email services are sort of left in no-man’s-land.
Do they still have it? He left around the turn of the century so it seems like a better argument would be that having an immensely profitable company puts you at risk of having caretaker CEOs who will be optimizing for Wall Street analysts rather than success.

A better target would be Itanium: that was in his era and showed the danger of picking the wrong gamble. They wanted a proprietary platform which couldn’t be copied by AMD, Cyrix, etc. but they staked the whole exercise on a highly speculative CPU design and made a number of horrible tactical errors like trying to screw a few million in compiler licensing out of developers at the time when their multi-billion bet-the-company investment crucially depended on developers porting to a chip which was critically dependent on having the best compiler. Being paranoid about preventing competition lead them to be shockingly cavalier about their plans being robust.
Thanks for the link, that's pretty advanced stuff then.
My email is in my bio. Can anybody hook me up as well?

Generally not spammy and like to think I provide more value than I take on an online message board.
What. Deploying capital to make investments is the central conceit of capitalism. It’s right there on the tin.
https://archive.ph/gb5bT
Well of course it's now useless to extreme leftists/communists, but this IS INTENDED.

I never ever visited twitter, but I'm happy with X. So much good content, if you know where to search, and this was only possible because censorship is basically removed now (I mean censorship of PERSONS, not tweets).
Hi can I also get an invite?
srbh077@gmail.com
Are there any concluded legal processes that are concerning

1) the form of consent banners

2) consent vs legitimate interest for ip transmission as part of http request headers

3) whether ads are a legitimate interest for web sites?

Those seem to me to be the 3 “big questions” of the GDPR. The regulation and most legal processes however seem to focus more on large scale data storage cases, failure to answer user requests etc. And those are important from a privacy standpoint but from a technical standpoint to software developers the 3 above seem much more interesting, yet mostly ignored by courts? I get a feeling they don’t want to touch it because they are a can of worms
Just to add some color to this… values come in from the DOM as strings or numbers or booleans. They go out over HTTP as strings. (These are approximations, I’m going from memory.) The question then becomes: Should I inspect the values or just pass the values along? You can see how a simple form might just collect data and pass it along to a backend, maybe do a bit of cursory inspection of the values to make sure they’re in range. A sophisticated web app, on the other hand, might construct an in-browser-memory model from the data, and so needs to vigorously ensure that the data is correct. In the first case types can be a pain since you’re not telling the compiler anything that isn’t already well understood. In latter case they’re a necessity.
Some kids will behave with just a verbal cue. For the better or worse, most won't. That's one of the reason some restaurants have a play area, to deal with that tension.

> Disciplining children (even just verbally) seems to be something nobody wants to do anymore

"Parents these days" ?
That’s what I was talking about as well. A pager is the only mobile communication device allowed in those spaces so it’s impossible for a family member to contact you when you’re walking around otherwise.
I don't understand the reason for putting gender identity in quotes? There are structural differences in the brains of cis and trans gendered people which result in their respective behaviour and outcomes [1].

Womens rights are trans rights at a philosophical and ideological level, and this tactic of using "protect the women" is unfortunately used by the same people who at times act against women rights [2].

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-020-0666-3

[2] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/psj.12484
Sure. But now we get to the really hairy problem: library coverage and community support. That's why I think most languages should start converging together already.

IMO we the programmers scatter ourselves too much.
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1156943/what-is-the...
He learned to differentiate under the integral from Advanced Calculus by Woods, in high school.
When you can reliably tell they have a monopoly on violence, it's far to late to do something about it.

However, Very Bad Things™ can happen long before they have monopoly on violence. And violence where? Large companies operate in weak jurisdictions, not only in their home states of Maryland and Ireland.
Yeah, but also, if the hole is $0 vs $8 billion, you probably get less jail time.
Lol. Good one. These protocols are completely independent of the content that you can send over them.

For the most part they reuse TLS so the encryption is the same (and uses the same certificate authorities) so any man-in-the-middle proxies, like those used by corporations, are technically able to intercept them to monitor content just like they can for https. (Though personally those sorts of things make me feel ill )

Good luck banning these protocols as well. They're perfectly valid IP packets so identifying them is going to be hard.
Those parts would still end up bought by Blackrock, Vanguard or whatever index fund is in fashion and steered by these funds that have the easiest business model but no capacity to innovate.
They actually have gone down. Feds have tightened up. I would guess the national average is about 52% and at that overhead rate university do lose money!

Here is old news that the HN community needs to catch up on.

https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-plan-reduce-over...
Something Mysterious Appears to Be Suppressing the Universe's Growth -Scientists
Google is sitting on $120B in cash.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GOOGL/balance-sheet?p=GOOGL
And it just gives a shitty search experience. You don't want people finding math stuff instead when searching for your product and people searching for math don't want to find some unrelated software.
It's so sad what Wired has become
(My math is probably old and maybe I forgot some things)

I think zero is kinda strange in a way: it is intuitive mostly when thinking about quantities but when dealing with other concepts I find it strange to think about it. Here are some situations where I know how to answer but reasoning about it is still in a way hard:

N^0
or
0^N
or
0!
or
or more simpler when thinking about limits and zero try to see what happens when you try to reach 0 while going like this 0.9^0.9, 0.8^0.8, … 0.001^0.001, 0.0001^0.0001

In most cases I think we are defining the answer. Maybe there are some complex proof for these answers but they only prove that zero is kinda hard to grasp.

Or it might be that I forgot a lot of math and I am wrong with these examples.
Young people in overspecced cars? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgDoXu__KyM
that's spycraft
Protocols that aren't HTTPS (like SMTP) are still alive. The reason for no new protocols is that some network infrastructure will consider non-TCP/UDP/ICMP packets badly formed and reject them.
Yeah, I mean if we all understood regardless, it can’t matter that much in an informal setting.
>The QUIC protocol combines the three way handshake and the three way key exchange to half the time I takes to set up a connection and provides a fast start (0rtt) for resuming a previously configured connection.

UDP is okay and has some problems. QUIC is not the universal solution for them.

The lifetime of that QUIC setup will only be ~90 days. Because with every QUIC implementation in existence use of self-signed certs is not enabled by default and TLS-less connections are not allowed in the standard. This hold especially true for QUIC based HTTP/3 libs. So as soon as something in the TLS breaks or drops you your QUIC based service is inaccessible to 99% of people on Earth. That's fine, good even, for Microsoft or Google. But that kind of built in fragility, transience, and corporate centralization/dependence is really bad for hosting a personal website or service. QUIC is for corporate persons usage and it's design reflects that. It's terrible for human persons and makes no concession for human person use cases.
Yep absolutely, I agree and understand how much we're getting for free.

On the other hand, their marketing and hype machine has gotten the industry at large to buy into their product. So when you promise enough to get companies to move to your (free, open source) tech stack, but then are MIA when there are issues... I am of two minds.

But yes at the end of the day you're right.
This is a really creative solution to orphaned pods.
Ask HN: Why aren't Django Admin style dashboards popular in other frameworks?
We're a Django shop and we get tremendous value out of Django Admin. Most python-heads I know suggest Django Admin as a major reason to go with Django over flask or FastAPI. Beyond that, I don't think there's a clear equivalent in another language either. My question is this:

Why has Django Admin proliferated so strongly in the Django ecosystem while being unreplicated elsewhere?
You don’t have children.
But now we're just talking the ease of making a copy, which I don't think is part of the law.
I wonder what the burn rate is for these AI companies. $2b is a shit ton of money but I can easily see it quickly draining with a large team of devs, data scientists, SREs, and misc costs such as specialty hardware and cloud costs.
I have a sibling very close in age and in my experience just coming from the same home and parents doesn't mean a whole lot, siblings can have wildly different experiences and be treated by the adults around them quite different. Not to mention there are forces which make you want to differentiate from your sibling and intentionally be different. I don't think that anecdote is nearly informative enough to make any conclusions.
A holistic approach to computing and sustainability inspired from permaculture
> > Maybe you confuse intelligence with positive outcomes for the society.

I believe in the entrepreneurial sector it's about signing off novel products and services for the consumer which unlocks a new level of quality of life for the masses and a new level of consumer satisfaction which was never seen before.

Prostitution is not new, as a matter of fact it's the same experience ever since the stone age.

Bill Gates, Bezos etc go to bed knowing that they have signed off GUI OS for the masses or shopping with almost real time delivery for the masses, or Zuck with social media and the Google guys with search engine, they signed off something new and unprecedented.

Musk goes to bed knowing that he has signed off an elaborate financial engineering scheme to enrich himself by riding off of a political goal imposed from above which consumers would never voluntarily elect to pursue, and in ultimate analysis it's the same old car ownership experience which is a 120 years old experience, except old cars were more durable and better assembled than Teslas because they were not the front to an elaborate financial scheme.

You don't get to go back in time, the pioneering entrepreneurial pleasure in the automotive sector was already taken by the likes of Henry Ford and Karl Benz etc. now what's availible is the pleasure of using automobiles as a front for financial engineering schemes and it's nowhere as rewarding, that is also the reason why Musk is acting crazy and can't find satisfaction despite his net worth being higher than every other person in history, because the person who arranges his affairs in order to have their net worth go up would never be as satisfied as the person who just tried to build something they wanted to use and then happened to stumble into larger commercial success.
A Biden response to Desantis "exporting" arms to Israel?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/desantis-is-sending-so...
Security Slam 2023: Contribute to WasmEdge and Elevate Open Source Security