skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Lucky there. UK here. A couple of years back I had a macbook pro delivered to me. It was delivered to the correct number on a different road. The POD had a photo of the front door and the person. I recognised the front door as it was on a local estate. Phoned delivery company up (DPD) and they said that they delivered it to the correct location and wouldn't do anything about it. Went round there and the guy said "um, it's mine now. Finders keepers. What are you going to do about it?".

So I phoned the police. They never turned up.

I opened up a credit card chargeback. But I was complaining about this to someone in the school playground and someone else overheard it. Turns out she was his next door neighbour. Said "I'll get it back for you". Sure enough that afternoon she turned up with it! Turns out the guy was a convicted paedophile and she knew that and said if he didn't give it back she'd tell everyone on the estate.

You need leverage or a good police force against criminals. The latter is rare so I suspect that taking matters in to your own hands is sometimes required.
Next time try your library. Many offer free access over the web.
I think you should read the 1Password security whitepaper before rambling on about things you clearly haven't spent the time and effort to learn about.
I just did tests and my app uses x/2 memory from official jellyfin desktop client
Entirely possible! I mean right now we restrict endpoint definitions to HTTP methods but in theory you could define unique endpoints for any combination of parameters. What I would want to find is the most effective / used combinations as opposed to unlimited flexibility.
In July 2023 the crates.io team started asking for feedback around changing their policy around name squatting - https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/318791-t-crat...
Yes. One gets used to the system and then it works okay. That ridge dividing lanes may be there for safety reasons.. but one thing I observed is the anxiety to choose wrongly, and the subsequent road rage when wrong decision was made. Both intoducing to my noob eyes new safety hazards. And then I didn't mention cars that deliberately drive over the ridge.
We still use AWS but it's been a couple years since I've really needed to dig into it because we have very competent people who'se job that is now.

My memories of having to find the right form, paste the right ID of the right server/bucket/lambda into are pretty traumatic. A TON of guesswork. Lot of what felt like duct taping things together.

If you don't have a full mental model of how everything works, they're certainly not going to help you get one without reading documentation. Their documentation is for the most part top tier, but the UX makes it more important than it arguably should be.

There's a difference between not handholding and just being obtuse, and I feel like so much of AWS's UI/general design philosophy falls into the latter camp.
The part you're missing is you have to yield when changing lanes, just like in any other road. If you are in the inner lane and you want to exit, you have to make sure the coast is clear. In other words, you are responsible for not getting hit. If you just blindly change lanes you might get crashed into and that would be your fault.
Not OP, but no, similar to how I haven't considered studying by candlelight again even if my power goes out for a few hours.
IMHO a lot of these 0.x libraries would be called 3.. In other languages
S.

They often have better quality than what I find in "mature" packages in npm or PyPi.

Rust kind of has a perfectionist touch to it which makes it really hard to say "this public API is stable". So people stay at 0.. way longer than normal.

I'm fine with that.

The lack of namespacing and heavy namesquatting is rather what's annoying.
Roundcube 0-day vulnerability in the wild
> Now figure out how to prove by static analysis that a specific use of this does not violate Rust's no-aliasing rules (N read-only, or 1 mutable).

Out of curiosity, is there any existing language (including research languages) that can do this already?
Them offloading domain registration is pretty bizarre
Is soc2 a hard requirement?
At least here in Poland you can buy a sim card no questions asked, but it will not work until you register it - an action that requires you give up PII, including a valid PESEL[1].

I assume the legal basis for all of this is "terrorism!", which would imply that cheating on this could result in... nothing enjoyable.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PESEL
Truly seamless because the zig compiler is also a C compiler, so the type information and calling convention works across languages at a level above any other I've encountered.
He was a bit cheeky but believed in the cause of the EU becoming more prominent and had a perspective for what is important. UvdL is so much worse she would skip several magnitudes here. She is basically popular because nobody understands what she is saying.
The first company to incorporate real time crawling and daily updates into the models will be the true Google contender. ChatGPT as an oracle for 'old' knowledge is already a fantastic tool, unfortunately the browsing plugin is completely useless (for me): extremely slow and shallow.
Rust is an excellent follow up to those languages. It's got many influences from Haskell, but is designed to solve for a very different task that's not yet in your repertoire so you'll learn a ton.

And yes the Python interop is excellent.
It's nothingburger because America doesn't have a democracy. It has an oligarchy with two sports teams for the masses.
If you are a premium user for longer than a day: Use bing mode. Say “browse” in the first few tokens. You can talk it into it, but saying browse works.

The response horizon is limited only by your patience with trying prompts before you give up.

Tips for skeptics

1. Don’t give it a url. But “github tmux/tmux” will usually work. There is a layer that finds tools via common whitelisted services; arbitrary urls make it morally panic ;)

2. State your intentions. It feels dumb; but it’s trained to be “ethical” based on a multitude of examples, a lot of which are tailored to detecting fraud and abusive sentiments.

3. It’s continuing a conversation. Telling it things are going well makes it continue a good conversation. Pessimism makes it struggle. It’s mimicking us, after all.
Those "Brush Strokes" are effectively the source code. To be considered open source, yes source code needs to be provided along side the binaries (the "image").
A person trolling is a person with dark humor. I like persons with dark humor. These persons tend to be warm and humane as well. Dark humor comes from experiencing life kicking you in the guts early enough, so that you can start to joke about it. It's all a joke, but make the best out of it.
The biggest enemy of the USA is the US government.
Historically there are not many instances of this happening tho, unless we are speaking of truly absolute majorities that follow already dictatoric governments. Evil governments have it very easy if the laws they encounter when they get into office are ones that are practical for evil governments.

Even the actual Nazis had to fake a reason for why they need to abolish democracy ("Reichstagsbrand"). The reason why they could do that were laws. Laws that might have looked okay in democratic times.

When you have a healthy, strong democracy your division of powers and opposition should be able to hold off a evil government for enough time voters can vote them out again. That is a core idea of democracy and the reason why there are the different branches.

Now your governments can create/modify/remove laws in a way that weakens that division between the branches and makes it easier for evil government to remove their opposition, influence the justice system and command the military to break their oaths etc.

Our task during non-evil governments is to avoid accidentally weakening those defenses.
> 215 billion tons of carbon dioxide over the next 75 years if spread across croplands globally.

But for how long does the rock 'function' before needing to be replaced? I'm doubtful that it would work at the same rate over just a few years, let alone 75.

With the need for massive mining, transportation and application of the rock at regular intervals I wonder if it would erode what ever gains this gives us.
Do you really need SOC2 compliance? If a customer problem is big enough and underserved, could you start serving customers without it? Or is it a way of potential customers telling you "no" while being nice about it?
Thank god Wojciech Wiewiórowski is a voice of reason in the middle of all this. But it’s extremely concerning that it’s reaching all the way to our final thin lines in the EU. This shouldn’t even get further than the lobbying.
Most deep learning frameworks allow you to save and load model weights. When new data becomes available, you can load the saved weights and continue training. This is essentially what happens during fine-tuning. So, yes, they probably could just update GPT with new data.

But there would be a difference in outcome compared to training a model from scratch with all the info available in 2023. Training from scratch would ensure that newer data has equal footing with older data. So a model trained from scratch in 2023 might have a more balanced understanding of both old and new data. Also there's a chance that the model might identify new patterns or nuances.

When you just fine-tune the existing model there might be areas where the model's response leans more towards the knowledge from 2021.

Having said that, training the model from scratch with all the new data would be incredibly resource-intensive, so I'm pretty sure OpenAI didn't go that route.
There are different parts (often not physically connected, but connected via chemical signalling) which work together to perform various functions. If one of the parts doesn't work, the function is degraded. It's a distributed system.
> If you make a mistake in your probability estimation in your favor, then great, you win more, but if you make a mistake against, it bites you and you lose more than you would have thought.

There are two mistakes we can make due to inaccurate probability estimation that are not on our favor: Betting too little, and betting too much (relative to the actual Kelly optimum with the true probabilities). I believe betting too much is disproportionately worse than betting too little. But I haven't seen a direct argument for why this would be so.

The Nick Yoder Blog post is interesting, but he basically says: people just happen to be risk averse, and that's the reason we happen to want to bet less than the Kelly optimum.

> Most people assign a negative value to risk. That’s why we pay a premium to insurance companies to haul away excess risk.

But I don't think a psychological disposition is the right explanation here. The original video I linked to suggests that it is actually irrational to bet the estimated Kelly optimum when the probabilities are estimated. No matter whether you are psychologically risk averse or not.
Yeah, I wonder if this is a US specific problem, because there seem to be plenty of "stable" established household appliance companies in Europe that are perfectly happy living on the margins of products that only get bought when the old model fails.

In this particular case I bought a simple "one knob for power, one for time" model at the local Swedish supermarket for the equivalent of about fifty dollars (because it was in the discount) just a few years ago. It was during covid times so it can't have been more than three years. It works fine, precisely because it's dumb.

They don't sell that model any more, but another local chain has the equivalent for (at current exchange rates) about 90 dollars[0].

[0] https://www.clasohlson.com/se/Fristaende-mikrovagsugn-vit/p/...
> Into a giant "word OR word OR word OR word"

Does that mean you'd return other docs if they share just one word?

The idea of tfidf is that it gives you a vector (maybe combined with pca or a random dimensionality reduction) that you can use just like an Ada embedding. But you still need vector search.
Better even use a long password 15 characters or more
No it does not, not even a little bit: read my comment carefully instead of rushing to reply.

> They cannot just inject "bits and pieces of newer information" to the old models as far as I know

Hence me saying:

>> the training cutoff date isn't some absolute date from which they never allowed any new data to be trained on

>> It's not going to reliably understand your new libraries, and more importantly if you convince it that it knows what happened in April 2023, it might start hallucinating extremely deeply

Fine tuning isn't for reliably adding information to a model, but you will end up adding novel sequences to the model that will very lossily capture new information.

It's more of an artifact of the process used than an intentional capability for end users to start trying to depend on. Once the context window contains enough "proof" that the model understands past it's cutoff, it will stop spitting out it's original disclaimer and seamlessly weave hallucinations into reality.
Gitea serves as an OIDC provider:

* https://docs.gitea.com/next/development/oauth2-provider

However, I don't see an equivalent API in gitea to the "debug_token" api.

If I'm developing an application that allows "Login with Gitea", how do I make sure my application is not vulnerable?
Thank you for the name. Yes, that design. As I just commented below the stress point shifts to entering the roundabout where people crazily yank their car sideways to be on the proper lane. At all cost avoiding the feeling of having made the wrong choice. Kind of road rage psychology. And anecdotal, YMMV. I think here the soft turbo is a great compromise.
When you approach a round about you must slow down, check your right, and then proceed. It works the same as a stop or yield sign.

In a 2 lane roundabout both lanes should be free before moving into it.

I mean, you can't rely on stop lights either. I've seen plenty of people run reds. What do you do then?
Biased since he was hired by Remix.
That's like asking for a source that the model isn't secretly ran by hamsters because you heard squeaking sounds in the server room.

The obvious answer isn't the one that needs a source, it's extraordinary claim that does.
> > I can't imagine it wouldn't be

> I can imagine it would be

No. That means something completely different. They're saying (probably hyperbolically) that they cannot imagine the first of two possible situations, not that they can imagine the second.
Benchmarking Full Disk Encryption for Modern AMD Ryzen Laptops
Just couldn't get IPv6 working with pfSense, as they had really limited support.

Moved to OpenWRT a few years ago and been quite happy since.
Careful with terminology too, because "inside" and "outside" don't mean the same thing to different drivers, particularly in the UK compared to elsewhere.

Many people hear "inside lane" on a motorway and think it's the "fast lane" near the central divider but that's actually the "outside lane". ( source: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/outside-... ).

But that terminology has been confused over time and so many people get it the wrong way around that the DVLA has stopped using it in the highway code.
I tried it and almost all the people who had visited my profile where still hidden.
Well safety comes first - this let's try it in production and see if it works for software - so a portion of youtube barfs - nobody harmed except missing their favourite cat vidoes.

The same with the FDA - we don't want a repeat of Thalidomide babies do we ???.
Other than the fireworks by the powders keg, the Billingtons seem pretty normal by today's standards.
> Maybe you're right, maybe it's more important to be happy than to see clearly.

The historical record of Marxism/Communism is quite clear.

I'm curious what you'd think of "critical thinking experts" who theorize that the Earth is flat, write Nebula award-winning novels about flat Earths, etc.?
Like all NeXTSTEP ones.
X Band
I don’t think Photopea or Vectorpea qualifies as tiny, there’s a lot of work there to make the base product.
Sure, there will be some pollution. It's very multivariate and depends on factors like content split, generation quality, and novel information. A scenario in which all of your data is generated by the previous model and you run n training loops is academic.

It's also worth noting that when OpenAI created Whisper, they had to heuristically remove many transcripts from poor ASR systems, and they definitely didn't catch them all.
I don't hold any sympathies for Meta/Facebook, but seriously: former disgruntled employees are always going to exaggerate negative aspects about their former employer, no matter what company we're talking about.

Maybe it's interesting and can tell us something, but it's not going to be objective and sometimes not even true.

Edit: Consider this message deleted. I left the original content intact. The point still stands, even if it doesn't apply to this article.
Yes. My takeaway from that account wasn't that there is necessary a hidden truth, but that some people do believe there is one and such belief correlates with their identity politics.

The fact that the argument appears to be cut and dry is also testament to the fact that it has been rehearsed many times and shared within that identity community
And here I was, a random passerby to your argument, hoping for you to finally tell what's wrong with Gibson Research, yet I only heard a lot of moaning with no substance.

From outside, it looks like you have a grudge against them, but brought no actual reason. Thanks for your input I guess.

Before you shut me down as well, I learned of Gibson Research in this very thread. I'm no paid actor.
Given that Zig is memory unsafe it isn't either a good general purpose language.

IMO a good GPR is memory safe (no C, C++, Zig), is easy to use(no Rust), has strong static typing (no Perl, Python, Ruby) and is "stable" (no Scala). Lots of choices remain: Java, Kotlin, Ada, D, OCaml..
> Command palette - i don't know what you are using it for

Discovery!

No doubt, command mode in vim et al. is probably the most powerful thing. However, as with anything shell, it all has to be laid out a priori.

Command palettes are fuzzy-finding, allowing reckless abandon for hacking into them. Single-letter commands have to be remembered, productivity suffers. Fuzzy is pretty much just as fast and grows with the user dynamically. I'll look into whether Helix has that.
Feel free to email keith@instant.dev if you’re legitimately interested :)
Turbo roundabouts also have a significant bonus in throughput, have significantly less points of conflict than a normal two lane at the expense of longer lead-in roads. A single lane is safer but has a drawback in cars per hour.
Buy a Panasonic. They seem to care about user experience. Beeps once, +30 starts it, and they're the only one with an inverter, so you can do a true 50% (unless I'm in a huge hurry I always cook at 50% for double the time, and it seems to come out much better).
And we will believe all the lies AI will tell us about the past because we have no way to verify - what an amazing future.

Alternatively, we will only understand anything in ancient Rome if we understand Latin and other languages because the NPC stay true to that.

The biggest issue would be that Romans viewed certain things so different to us, so our ability to understand would need heavy support to work.
>I think this is mostly a philosophical statement, but it certainly has truth to it.

It's fact. What theory is there to prove that the following design is the best possible design? What does "best" even mean? We can't verify formally in anyway how good a design is overall.

We can verify, efficiency, we can verify speed, and we can verify correctness. But design? We can't verify that.
> AI’s capacity to give members of the public the tools to create biohazards

Awfully specific fear.

I agree that AI use for surveillance needs to be limited for facial and emotional recognition, although I don't see the EU being constructive here. They want to surveil text chats and introduce an internet ID. In the background of that they just could go home because they already failed enormously to protect any civil liberties.
> I don't hold any sympathies for Meta/Facebook, but seriously: former disgruntled employees are always going to exaggerate negative things about their former employee, no matter what company we're talking about.

Ahem, the article is about Governments "harassing" FB employees to get changes in how FB worked wrt content moderation.
Ditto!

I once had a daily commute that involved 22 roundabouts each way. One every 2.5 miles on average.

The smaller ones with infrequent and low traffic cause a slowdown for everyone unnecessarily - that’s a lot of break dust and fuel to accelerate again

But I’m no traffic engineer so what do I know!
He acts out his irrational fears and amplifying it because of his wealth and social media.

But he gets a special pass from his little cult for being homophobic and having racist overtones.
Relevant is https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/85542 , a (very stale) PR that uses mrustc to get straight to Rust 1.29 and then walks the chain.
Sorry, you're right!

I'd delete grandparent, but can no longer do so.
Suppose there is a partial rollout? There’s lots of possible explanations. I don’t think GP faked it, I’m pointing out a verbatim question/answer pair isn’t a reliable test.
This Week in Rust 518
exactly how I think about these, article would be more genuine if written by someone less biased toward Remix. They are saying "nextjs is bad" only to recommend something bad in a different way.

Unfortunately I have not seen anything better than them for javascript. Of course I am a bit hesitant to venture out of React's comfort zone to try something like Astro, that doesn't help
Do you know the origin of the UK use because that always confused me as it’s obviously wrong from the drivers perspective of the road! My wild guess would be that from the drivers seat you look outside to the fast lane and look across the inside of the car to look to the slow lanes.
The Register is a tabloid
Here you go (2015): https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/ridebeeline/beeline-sma...

I thought it looked fun, but no way to justify the price.
You did a cryptographically secure deletion of that hard drive, right? Even odds there were bad things in that drive.
If you are accusing me of being absurdist or reductionist, know this: floor mats were the official cause of "sudden acceleration", where they would slip off their pegs that were holding them to the floor (usually due to human error), and would jam the pedal to the floor. Or sometimes between the brake pedal and the floor preventing correct operation of the brake. In fact, Toyota and NHTSA issued an urgent recall in 2009 to remove all floor mats from vehicles due to this very issue: https://www.safetyresearch.net/toyota-and-nhtsa-issue-urgent...

So yes, the line was very obvious because these are events that happen in real life, risk that you say you wanted to eliminate by absolutely playing it safe: "_anything_, there is no such thing as excessive 'playing it safe'"

I can only assume that your original comment was reactionary and hyperbolic, but then got upset over where that kind of hyperbole lead in the past.