skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Also, the main damage from cars isn't the manufacturing — over the vehicle lifetimes, the emissions from literally burning fuel far out-mass the manufacturing emissions.

Again, personal vehicle ICE fuel burning is only a relatively small part of global emissions (about 9%). People are just fixate on it because it happens in their back yard so that's all they see everyday as the main polluter instead of the giant mines in Australia and Africa or the giant factory towns in China, or the oil wells, air travel, shipping industry, etc.

But there are lower hanging fruit which are a lot more environmentally damaging than those 9% of ICEs, except nobody's talking about them berceuse those are all big industry related and it's much cheaper to push the blame on the 9% powerless peasants driving ICEs so you can sell them EVs, instead of dealing and hurting the profits of the giant polluting industries out there that account for the other 90% and onto which the lifestyle of the world is tied to.

Rich western countries moving to EVs in 10 years will not alleviate this if countries like China, India and from Africa mine and burn even more fossil fuels as they industrialized further and lift even more people out of poverty.

>Not even close, and I don't know why your beliefs are so badly calibrated.

It's not my belief, it's been scientifically proven that the planet's climate cannot sustain the emissions from the mining and manufacturing efforts of transitioning all ICE cars on the road today to EVs.

>If we even attempt to solve greenhouse gas emissions just by reducing overall economic consumption, then whoever ignores that edict can trivially take over the world

That's the reason the climate issue will never be solved and why we're heading towards the iceberg of environmental destruction full speed ahead. Because everyone wants to have their cake and eat it too. Nobody wants to tone down on consumerism, wealth building and lifestyle enabled by fossil fuels, oil, gas, petroleum and manufacturing.

Something has to give. You either want to be rich enough to feed and house every mouth on the planet, or you want to have a habitable planet with less well off mouths on it. You can't have both with our current lifestyle and trajectory.

That's why we're doomed to destroy ourselves. Because no country or individual wants to compromise on their wealth and lifestyle. On this path we can expect extreme climate phenomenons to increase in strength and frequency, along with more famine, political and economic instability, wars and refugees. EVs alone won't save us from this.
I tried googling the risk and it's all a bit inconclusive but:

>The linear no-threshold model is disputed by several health organizations, including the American Association of Physicists
in Medicine and the Health Physics Society,
both of which concluded that cancer risk estimation should be limited to doses greater than 50 mSv. Both organizations
state that risks from doses below this threshold are too small to be detectable and may be nonexistent.
Though people are making valid points in the other comments, don't underestimate what stress and bad circumstances can do to one's cognition. This isn't necessarily how he was performing before.
You can probably build a rig to feed false data to the sensor, or take a photo of a sufficiently high-resolution display, or use side-channel power analysis to extract the cryptographic keys. I have serious doubts this kind of provenance metadata will actually work against a sophisticated attacker (someone willing to spend more than 100k on making fake images), but I'm sure it will be used as an excuse to further lock down computing platforms.
> Yet only about 200 people (0.0001%) donate kidneys to strangers per year. Why the gap between 25-50% and 0.0001%?

Scott is right to point out the gap, but I don't expect him to donate another kidney next year. Even for those who follow through on their good intentions, kidney donation is a one-time event not an annual event, so it shouldn't be compared to an annual rate. Assuming that would-be kidney donors have a window about 50 years to follow through on their good intentions, the gap should be between 25-50% and 50 x 0.0001% = 0.005%.
> There are online communities beyond X

As an aside, I find this phrase funny today. In the past, I would have known you are using the term 'X' to be a generic reference to online communities. Today, I don't know if you are talking specifically about twitter or just a generic online community.
So why aren't we doing that? Like what's the rub? And it better not be BigRecycling or imma lose my mind right now (you know what I mean) :/
I feel like the rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence are not really what this is all about. The US isn't saying you can't write derogatory things about it online, so it's not denying any rights. But non-citizens don't automatically have a right to enter the country, correct?
>Actually generating a recipe is obviously much harder, and should be effectively impossible unless you include a humanoid robot that can cook and taste.

It's not because this necessary information is already implicit in the sum of all the data it is trained on.
West Seattle and Ballard are flip sides of the same coin (that coin being Highway 99).
Caveat: I consider myself a noob at benchmarking, after spending probably 1,000 hours on it over the years.

The CPU benchmark used HPL linpack following a standard-ish Top500-style benchmark, mostly because I think it's fun to see how various single CPU systems compare to historic 'supercomputers' on the official lists.

There are different ways to calculate (and benchmark) flops, the way I'm doing it is with this open source project: https://github.com/geerlingguy/top500-benchmark — which can use OpenBLAS, Blis, or ATLAS, and I've tried all three un-tuned.

I also worked with some Ampere engineers to run their optimized version for Ampere Altra Max: https://github.com/AmpereComputing/HPL-on-Ampere-Altra

On their own server systems with 8 channels of memory they topped out around 1.6 Tflops. There are other tests you can run and get more or less Tflops, but I based my own results on the top500 test.

See more discussion about the results and testing in the following links:

https://github.com/geerlingguy/top500-benchmark/issues/19
https://github.com/geerlingguy/top500-benchmark/issues/17
https://github.com/geerlingguy/top500-benchmark/issues/10

(And see some of the issues linked back to the Ampere repo in those issues.)

Edit: And regarding the video card mention—it was meant more as a generic reference (e.g. running A100 or 4090 since you can go much further there than Altra Max), and not specifically to the 4070 Ti... but I can see how that is not as clear!
I found this obscure emacs package last week that seems related: https://github.com/KeyWeeUsr/typewriter-roll-mode

(I'm not related to this package in any way. Don't use it either.)
Unfortunately there is growing evidence that lead stays in soils for decades or maybe centuries. I can imagine in the future that lead contamination of farmland might mean that we end up with a kinda crazy reversal - we end up growing all our food in undeveloped places like south america that never had as much lead contamination, and food from the USA and other developed countries is so lead contaminated that it gets exported to places like africa where they don't have strict regulations against contaminated food.
If you're saying that it's actually a very nuanced discussion, (even -or especially- when it comes to the law), then I'll take it!

Note that much of the world has signed the Berne convention[1], and thus most countries tend to have similar laws when it comes to copyright.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention
I see three quotes from past contributors in the article, that seems like valuable knowledge to me? Anecdotally as someone who contributes to the Django admin I see the interest is there. I’d say it being clunky is for other reasons (for example there being more back-end developers contributing to the project than other skillsets).
In practice I don't think it's as good as in theory. I had Apple Macbook Pro with Apple Monitor, and 50% of the time when unplugging the monitor the laptop screen would stay off. Plugging back in to the monitor wouldn't work at that point so all I could do was hold the power button to force it off and reboot. That's with Apple controlling the entire stack - software, hardware, etc.

I think the real benefit is being able to move/deprecate/expand at will. For example, want an app that would require special hardware? You can just add it. Want to drop support for old drivers? Just stop selling them and then drop (deprecate) the software support in the next release.

I fully agree about the evilness, and it baffles me how few people do!
While that is an issue, I don't see why you think that is connected?

The article only mentions contamination in phosphate-based fertilizers.
For non-geniuses like myself, you can just ask to test out of some of the lower tier introduction courses. I got a typically 4-year degree in 3 years this way. It's called credit-by-examination.

I'm sure for the prodigy-level students there is an even higher streamlined process for keeping them engaged.
…and then hand-packing to include or remove individual ingredients on a per-order basis? As someone with a significant ERP & warehouse implementation at work, that sounds very expensive and error-prone. Unfortunately :(
Okey, Can you then provide me some info about those Java compiler/LVM stuff?
Last time I used Java was in time it had Sun Microsystems logo :) It was sth like Java 1.5.x. JRE installer was 16MB, so for my standards its already quite heavy.
My old ruby static that I provide with scripts is under 1MB. I wonder if I am missing something...
Most people don't live in downtown, or the U district, or Northgate, where taking the train would make sense.
What causes all of these papers published on github without code?
In this case, the undisputable record relies on the word "biggest" before each noun. Lake Superior is the only "biggest lake in the world" and so on.
But the right to free speech isn't impacted.

It's "right of entry/movement" that is impacted, and that along with a few others (voting) isn't extended to non-citizens at all.

While the United States is certainly big enough to ignore a few insults, some derogatory statements might imply a willingness to do the country or its people harm.
BP buys $100M worth of Tesla chargers
The Great Hacker Photo Hack (2013)
> And yes, on the surface this incentivizes people to create better content.

Maybe, maybe not. Without specifying what trait you're talking about, "better" is largely a meaningless term.
The 'it' in AI models is the dataset
An incredibly bad idea to me, but great if it works for some. Will definitely keep an eye on reviews for it.

Also as it always is with these young-person-creates-a-company stories:

«Huang’s parents, who run a metals recycling business near Shenzhen, China connected him with manufacturers in the region.»

I wonder who payed for the first production run.
People don't seek maximum diversity. People seek the exact diversity of a small sample of the world they tolerate.

The people that say they do are just unaware of all the diversity they reject.
This was my experience with hello fresh as well. Subpar produce and absolutely useless recipes. It feels like the ingredients and recipes are the things this company focuses on the least, never trying them again and I actively dissuade people from using them whenever it comes up in conversation.
One thing I'm curious about... with the hinge closed, is this monitor functionally equivalent to an RLCD display (like SunVision's products or the Hisense Q5), or is there still a discrepancy in brightness versus an RLCD display in equivalent ambient light?
There may be tricks that I don't know about. One quick experimental answer I can give: if I change to looping over the sums and rerun Benchmark 3, my time in the aten::sum CUDA kernel increases from 0.779s (before) to 0.840ms (after). So CUDA doesn't seem to automagically handle this.

I will note that these grouped operations occasionally cause a net loss in performance compared to "naive" looping, since it involves calling PyTorch's "x.view(...)" which is usually ~instant but sometimes adds some extra CUDA operations on the backward pass. It always reduces the time spent in aten::add, but adds these extra ops. A really smart vectorizer would use heuristics to decide how/whether to group operations according to the target hardware; my current vectorizer just does the grouping every time.
Living in California all my life and seeing local municipalities essentially pretend they're still in the 1970s and adhere to car orientation and single family homes for their land use really makes me wish these jurisdictions would lose local control with policies like the Builder's Remedy.
I went through with it twice without sedation. Hilariously uncomfortable but not really painful or anything. Lots of gagging.
I mean, if you have gone out of your way to shape your own wooden furniture that looks like his, out of wood that you harvested or purchased, then the value generated is yours via your woodworking skill and no one would expect you to buy it if you're capable and willing to make it yourself.

That being said you're engaging in all manner of motivated reasoning to get around basic theories of value and clinging to this notion that if you could somehow get a flawless copy of a thing someone is selling that is in all other ways equivalent to the original that you haven't committed a crime, and while technically true, it utterly obliterates the notion of intellectual property. Now, IP law as it exists has many problems and pitfalls that require reform, however you are seemingly arguing that the theory of intellectual property is invalid, which is quite an interesting viewpoint for someone who apparently earns their living writing software.

In so far as the following assumptions are true:

- The world in which you live requires that you earn a living to subsist yourself
- The world in which you live desires intellectual creations that can be copied harmlessly (movies, software, art, music, basically all entertainment products, design blueprints, et al)
- Reality consists of a finite amount of time, of which a given individual receives a certain amount, and during which said individual must balance activities that generate income to cover the cost of assumption 1
- The reliable way for an individual to satisfy assumptions 1 and 3 is to dedicate a certain amount of time to the creation of products that can be sold

While you taking a copy of something that you never intended to buy doesn't technically cost an author a sale that would, by your statement, never occur, it nevertheless means that you now possess their creation that was made with their energy, skills, and time which are individually all expressions of their finite time on the planet, assumption 3. That is, no matter how you want to excuse it, unethical. Energy is conserved, matter is conserved, theft of someone else's time and effort to produce a thing you wanted is theft.
No, the headline is almost literally what Musk said:

“It would blow my mind if we don’t have that rolled out by the end of next year,” Musk said, confirming that “when I say payments, I actually mean someone’s entire financial life. If it involves money, it’ll be on our platform. Money or securities or whatever. So it’s not just like 'send $20 to my friend.' I’m talking about, like, you won’t need a bank account.”

If you want to nitpick you could quibble with conflating "by 2024" and "by the end of 2024"
I now consider myself better-informed!
I have no idea what would make you say such things other than a deep, unrational hatred for a framework.

Nothing about React specifically enables that kind of design.
Hmm, I thought students could develop back problems from carrying textbook laden backpacks? Is that just an old wives tale?

The Holiday Inn Shin Osaka has a washing machine in the suites. Not sure why, but that was just my experience. You’re right that hostels and ”budget” chains like Dormy Inn will also have them.

I’ve also stayed at a resort on Sentosa Island that only had 1 self service washer/dryer machine, and I had to set a 2AM alarm clock to put our clothes in because it was busy otherwise. Usually hotels with self service laundry machines have a whole row of them. Probably by design so I’d give up and pay $10 per shirt washed.
Hear hear!

I've been following OAuth 2.1 for a couple of years. Can't wait for it to get released. If you want to check out the IETF draft, here is the current version: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-1-09.htm...

Reading the "Differences from OAuth 2.0" section is helpful for understanding what changes are coming: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-1-09.htm...

You can also give your feedback on this or any other draft on the IETF OAuth mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

I've been lurking there for a long time and learned a lot; you can view the archives here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/
Ahh, Delphi. Then I suppose its all right for it. Still, much better compared to Go or Java :D
At least you support the system and the mindset, even it you are not depriving a specific creator of their income. This is a topic where the individual act is usually irrelevant, but the collective action sums up and might move in a harmful direction. I mean, Immanuel Kant might have something deeper to say about this..
Most Beijing subways until recently were all loops, so you could get there via subway, but it would take a long time because it was a giant loop rather than being direct. They are top notch, I'm glad other people take them, but I'll take a taxi unless I need to get somewhere during rush hour.

Especially getting to Beijing South in the morning with luggage, a taxi or hiring a car via didi is the best way to go. To get to Beijing south, how many transfers do you need to drag your luggage through? So let's see, from where I used to live with the lines in place now: I would need to drag my luggage to Tuanjiehu on line 10, take the loop around to jiaomenxi, and then take the line 4 up to beijing south. Or I could pay 50 kuai for a taxi from my apartment complex gate to the front door of the train station.
If your standard diesel engine fails it’s generally not a life threatening emergency though so change is much safer. Aviation has safety and regulatory habits written in blood.
Researchers study first stem cells from a bat species known to harbor SARS-CoV-2
While India is certainly a big market, to the best of my knowledge it’s nowhere close to China as far as using legacy apps or non-play store distribution. (Also expensive phones unsurprisingly don’t sell very well in India but that’s not very unusual.)
Yeah sorry about that; there was one link to the dev kit buried in the text, but I've added links to the Dev Platform and Dev Kit near the top now.
'Not of faculty quality': How Penn mistreated Katalin Karikó
None of those would have been common as we know them today. Refined sugar was expensive until ~industrialization. And HFCS simply didn't exist, which is what people are really discussing when they talk about sugar, refined foods, and the obesity epidemic.
How the Stoics Dealt with FOMO
SQLite is by far my favorite database for any client-side application - mobile and desktop (and perhaps embedded). I still wouldn't use it server-side for anything serious.

While you can do it, especially with tech such as LiteFS, I much prefer using database systems with built-in support for replication, failover, and splitting data storage from the app server.
Not to crap on an inventive kid, but I don't get this.

A normal LCD screen works by shooting a backlight (usually LEDs) through an LCD panel. All this project does is replace the backlight with either a reflective backlight, or ambient light if it's bright enough.

So how could this be any improvement beyond just turning down the brightness on a plain old LCD screen?
In second to last paragraph, you mean that for these reasons of contamination, fish and chocolate should not constitute too large a part of one’s diet, correct? Just trying to clarify.
Someone else mentioned about the differences between different categories of content on Twitter and I agree. Mainly, I like Twitter for sports. I have not experienced another platform that gives me this type of interactions with writers, show hosts, players, and other fans. I find Twitter for political stuff to be pretty bad. It's kind of amusing but that no matter how irrational and unhinged sports fans are in the U.S., they aren't as bad as what I see on political Twitter posts. :) I barely follow any tech/startup stuff on Twitter anymore. I'm not sure why, I guess the content just wasn't engaging to me. A side note, I've also bailed on IndieHackers as it seems to have changed (in my opinion) with regards to the type of content that made it cool in the beginning to whatever is going on there now. I guess IH is starting to experience this evolution in content that the author is talking about.

I still read HN though! HN has the most insightful and thoughtful comments/discussions and cause doom scrolling.
Well, I heard of one case where a bug was causing queries of 100,000 tokens at a time. https://medium.com/dataherald/cutting-llm-costs-by-83-with-l...
The saga of unleaded avgas has been long, expensive, and slightly ridiculous. It's not just FAA - not by itself, although regulatory capture is, of course, a frickin' plague. You had a big ol' mob of aerospace companies racing to lock in their engine designs for the next forever via mandated fuel specifications. This is the Golden Fleece in this industry: if you can get to write the next mandated spec, you can relax on your money bed for the rest of time.
I like to buy from local independent chocolatiers and now I'll have to think twice about that. I can call them and ask them if they test their chocolate sources for heavy metal but somehow I doubt many are doing that.
> They went with the stupid title and thumbnail because "the algorithm demands it"

The end result is I don't use their discovery crap at all, because it all looks like garbage I don't care about.

My use of Youtube has become very similar to my use of Xitter - never log in, almost never look at content on their domains, only on other peoples' sites.

I'm sure it works for them on average.
Afair Google just ran irc on their corp network which was completely separate from prod so I wouldn’t be surprised if it was in a small server room in the office somewhere.

> very broadly applicable. I don't see any "this would only apply at Google" in here.

One thing I haven’t even heard of anyone else doing was production panic rooms - a secure room with backup vpn to prod
> On the earnings call, Musk told X employees that his efforts to turn Twitter into an everything app will one day "exceed" China's everything app (called WeChat) and is happening at "the fastest rate of innovation maybe ever for any Internet company,”

Oh how the turn tables! We are going to get “new WeChat”.

Meta is better positioned to do this. Is Whatsapp not already used more extensively outside of the US as an everything style app? Anyways, I’m not going to put money and use a shitty app with no customer service.

We have existing options and don’t need a centralized app. China likes control and centralization so WeChat is a picked winner. X is not going to get picked and elevated by the US government.