skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As I recall, I could do something where I could have a common root crate that would import and re-export the other crates with the namespaces modified on the exports and then control which crates are exported through feature gates, but it just seemed more hassle than it was worth.
Lost my FRS radio up on the mountain once. I started calling it from my friends radio... "Hello, I'm a lost radio, please find me" and someone called me back and met up with me to return the radio.
Maybe, or maybe not. It's complicated.

But what's certain is that it's politically polarized. SDI has support from [some/most?] republicans but not from [most/any?] democrats.
Do new Apple devices still include 3 free months of Apple TV?
Hey SF leadership, it's only been 12 years... sigh. Do I need to come back down there and demonstrate how I point my index finger in the air? Don't worry, I'm not running for POTUS and using this as an opportunity to throw you under the bus as a political calculus.
Ask HN: What are some well-designed REPLs?
I am designing a DSL and a REPL, and am looking for some inspiration.

CLI or embedded in editor, I don’t mind either.
Well they are exempt from most laws.
It’s the expurgated version. The one without the gannet.
> Comcast cable is like $60-90/mo, including Internet+TV service.

I don't think that is anywhere close to the average cable + internet bill, which is north of $100, but I would be happy for some hard figures on it. The problem with cable, and Comcast in general, is that they offer that introductory only $60/month! And then after a year, its around $150 or something. Anyways, I'm not even sure who gets cable anymore, people who like to watch sports I guess.
He is a utilitarian. 20 years vs 30 in jail doesn't matter because he'll kill himself, or at least that's what he currently thinks. But a chance at zero is super valuable, so he's buying vol
Maybe it’s just fresh coffee? I don’t understand half these comments, it’s like they never made a pot of coffee before in their lives.

How do you expect them to cool down a fresh brew anyway, put it in a fridge for 10 mins before serving? I could imagine a busy coffee shop going through batches so quick that the pot is < 5 mins old before it’s empty

Fresh coffee is HOT, like 95 Celsius hot!
>Less than, worse than? First world people eat entirely too much, and unhealthily. Not hard to imagine diets better for humans and the ecosystem. Hell, 1.5 billion people are already vegetarian and doing fine. People will complain about eating less steak but it's a first world problem.

That might be true, but people also know they're eating too much and unhealthily, yet they continue doing so. Clearly getting them to stop requires much more effort and sacrifice than you make it out to be.

>People will complain about losing a dopamine button but it's a first world problem.

So you admit that it's actually worse? You're just hand waving it away by inserting your own value judgement.

>Smaller than? It's completely possible to improve thermal efficiency without altering size. Maybe, if you live in a sprawling poorly insulated McMansion, you should invest in better insulation - or a better house - instead of powering through by burning energy. Apartment blocks are already far more efficient for climate control (square/cube law), so it's squarely a rich person's problem.

See above.

>Fewer places than? Are people taking jet airplanes to work every day? Yeah, they should probably stop that. People taking the train are probably in the clear. This isn't even a first world problem, it's a superrich problem. Of course they'll complain...

You're ignoring going to far away places for tourism, visiting friend and family across the country, and going to the Costco on the other side of town.
Yeah, that was kind of my point in asking the question. Handing over companies to the employees might improve conditions for the employees but it does little to change any profit incentives they have. We need regulation and/or other external factors that force the fiduciary duty of companies (whether they be private/public/co-ops) to prioritize health, well being, privacy and the environment of both the employees and the customers.
>They saw the land was lightly populated and took it.

This framing is passive and hides the history that our own government even admits to[1]. The west wasn't simply lightly populated. There were state-sponsored and well documented extermination campaigns that cleared the land for white settlement.

1. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/what-happened-to-the-bison....
> negotiating with (and waiting for) an Ops team

> I don't mind paying more for that

I mean, it sounds like this is all through work. So regarding your second point about being okay paying more: are you the one cutting the cheques?
I used that as an example as I recently asked for it. I did find I had to tell it that "monster" in the title referred to monster trucks, not actual monsters. That helped it not put actual monsters in (as yours are half Blaze/half monsters), though my generations were way better at doing Blaze than yours were - they just had cute little monsters around too.
Not sure if it was intentional, but the choice of words made the headline immensely confusing to me, reading it as 'apple jacks' the cereal.

That out of the way, based on what I read on fora and such, it seems people are growing tired of the wheel of constant streaming price increases and claiming to be canceling. The next couple quarters should show how true that actually is.
Not directly addressing the content of the article, just a bit of a rant:
The problem is that in a lot of cases, EVs aren't a drop-in replacement for an ICE car. The idea of driving powered by electricity is very appealing to me, but for functionally equivalent cars (size, range, etc.) EVs do not exist at a competitive price point for my use case. Just listing a few issues below.

- I have one of the smallest car available on the market (not available anymore in fact, but w/ever) and have no need nor interest in a bigger car. The catch is that I almost exclusively use my car for long day trips on the weekend, typically ranging 3-450km (I commute by train and bike/walk for other daily errands). EVs in the same convenient compact format do not have 3-450km of range. Maybe 250km advertised range at most, which will amount to less than 200km of real-world highway kms. Frankly I will not put up with (potentially multiple) recharging breaks on what is supposed to be a quick daily excursion.

- Related to the previous point. My small car cost less than 20k new. Equivalent EVs (equivalent in usability i.e. sufficient range for my use case which as stated would actually mean a much bigger car) start at ~60k. Even with the lower running cost of an EV, that price difference will never be compensated over the lifetime of the car.

- EVs are extremely convenient if you can always recharge at home, and extremeley inconvenient if you always need to recharge at a public charging station (btw the price at public charging stations is a racket in France and Switzerland, not sure how it is elsewhere). Like many Europeans, I live in an appartment and my car is parked on the street. The possibility to recharge at home does not exist. To mitigate the inconvenience you need more range to recharge less frequently, which mean a more expensive car.
It's not that the likelihood is high, it's that it happens at all. It's a worry I won't have if I'm doing business with other vendors.

I want to predict behavior and Google has always been a little too hermetic and occult for my taste.
Perhaps there is actually useful information in there about the skill of the players
Spy satellite photos reveal hundreds of long-lost Roman forts
The answer is most likely yes. I have done this many times.

Some web forms make it very difficult. In which case you may have some places where you will need Keyboard Maestro to wait while you do some manual interactions. Still you can get most of the process automated
Nothing much, the hype transitioned to an ETF atm instead of realizing current options work good enough.
As a counter example, I love programming in Rust. Fighting the borrow checker ended a long time ago. Even the errors are rare these days, except in cases I trigger them in order to examine the types. Rust compiler also seems to have improved in accepting broader cases that are valid.

For me, the key to understanding the borrow checker was understanding the underlying memory model. Rust memory model is the same as that of C, with some extensions for abstractions like generics. The borrow checker rules seem arbitrary at first. But it's deeply correlated to this memory model. The real value of the borrow checker is when I trigger it unintentionally. Those are bugs that I made due to lapse in attention. What scares me is that another language like C or C++ might simply accept it and proceed.

Yet another pleasant side effect of Rust's strict type system and borrow checker is that they gently nudge you to properly structure your code. I can say for certain that Rust has improved my code design in all the languages that I use.
I was a cook at a Boy Scout camp summer of 1978. We got this cheese, probably because the camp was a nonprofit.

It was actually decent. Very mild cheddar flavor, dense texture.
Boca Chica now has a better launch pad with a flame deflector and a water deluge system.[1] They really needed that. The first version just fired the entire output of the booster at a flat concrete slab, which destroyed the pad, sending chunks of concrete into the ocean and around the area.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYRJn3uvw3M
I'm offering free consulting for sustaining open source projects
Sounds like nushell: https://www.jntrnr.com/case-for-nushell/
Sure, in the same way that Ferrari doubling its production means more people can get their kids to school conveniently.
ByteByteGo seems to almost be a content generation concept for a niche market. And the thing is, aspiring developers do, apparently eat this stuff up. Thing is though, you really don't truly assimilate these concepts from a simple diagram, not just because they are gross simplifications or crude approximations — they are — but because you need to "feel" what these systems are like in a real world scenario or at least to have broken your teeth designing one in order for any of these ideas to truly sink in a meaningful way.

So it's sort of like...if you have the experience of having designed these types of systems or are familiar with some of these ideas from firsthand experience, the cute diagrams hold very little value. If, on the other hand, you're a new engineer, you're gobbling up these diagrams, but they don't really hold any meaning. You can't just binge on some doc that attempts to collate all system design ideas and think you've got it. Knowledge isn't acquired by "carrying books". Now, I'm not saying there might not be value in these diagrams as a refresher or tool for someone already familiar with these concepts, but it's limited to that and I suspect newer devs are being led to believe they can just memorize these diagrams and they grok these ideas. Not so.

I also cannot help but feel the author sees this area and audience as fertile ground for producing a ton of content and gaining readership - it's substack, it's blog posts...and the list goes on. I really try to avoid imputing bad motive or malintent, but I can't help but feel this is cynical in the sense that the author knows this information in this format targeting this audience does very little for them and, worse, leads them astray because of how at odds it is presented vs the way real knowledge is actually acquired.

I guess what I'm mainly saying is: beware, young devs. This ain't it.
Disagree - a model may have capabilities that it only deploys in certain circumstances. In particular, if you train on the whole internet, you probably learn what both stupid and smart outputs look like. But you probably also learn that the modal output is stupid. So it’s no ding on the model’s capabilities if it defaults to assuming it should behave stupidly.
> Literally nobody has said this.

I know of a few people, personally, who have said this.
You vastly overestimate the impact these changes will make IMHO. Unless there are numbers backing up that they lost users there isn't proof that locking down had negative impacts.

I don't care how you feel about Google, I am just pointing out that "they made a lot of money" has an asterisk.
Comcast can die screaming, fiery deaths with rapid reincarnation between them.

The were the only ISP in a certain suburban wooded area. During planned power outages they would go out after ~16 hours because they failed to engineer survivability (choice of electrical circuits and backup power) as the cell phone networks, municipal water, and other critical services did.
There is a Nix VScode plugin
I'm not the person you asked, but Vapor hasn't had a major version change since 2020 (Vapor 4). Vapor 5 is at least another year out, probably more like 2 or 3.

Vapor 5 is definitely going to be a breaking change, but that's not a bad thing. The current major version predates async/await, actors, Sendable, macros, move-only types, variadic generics, and lots of other language features. It's been able to adopt some in incremental releases, but it wasn't designed with those things in mind.
This really resonates with me – yeah, the supposed API-driven engineering company, makes it no longer possible to automatically provision domain names for its "valuable" cloud computing customers?

What possible end could that serve? I am baffled by the idea that succeeding via open access to their infrastructure is not a serious long-term goal for Google.

For a company who ostensibly is existentially interested in developing at least one meaningful complement to it advertising business, of all the things https://killedbygoogle.com/ over the years, why the domain registrar? The cost to developer trust vs. the cost of ongoing operations – did they not even have that conversation?

Now I imagine how I would've felt to have my registration transferred to – I can't even recall who bought their customers – and I try to imagine putting faith in trusting GCP products with a startup idea, where ostensibly their second-mover advantage could let me move faster in greenfield development ... and I throw my hands up. This is a company acting like it places no value on goodwill, not even from a bare bean counter perspective.

I guess I'll stick to AWS (and more bespoke cloud offerings).
I doubt that would happen due to the focus on core libraries and tooling being platform agnostic, and deferring users to host tooling (and libraries) whenever possible.

The difference between debugging and profiling Clojure and ClojureScript is night and day. e.g. async-profiler and VisualVM are much better than whatever I've seen in the Node.js and browser ecosystems. But tools like FlowStorm seem to be helping close this gap, if you decide to use the custom compilers designed for it.

As someone whose day job is developing with ClojureScript, I've been keeping a close eye on developments in FlowStorm, and I always send this video to get people interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VXT-RHHuvI
Why do people have to be such grumps about this kind of thing?

Years ago, I was trying to rent an apartment. After the visit, the owner, an old lady, invited me to some tea in her own home nearby.

Not sure how the conversation came to that, I think it started with me asking about a parking spot, but she told me that washing the car is for poor people.

"For someone that drives a nice new car like yours it doesn't matter too much if it's clean. It's the guy with an ugly old car that spends a lot of time cleaning it, hoping that it will look better".

I didn't rent the apartment, but I learned a valuable lesson: don't worry about a little dust here and there.
This will likely just fatigue users, who will just keep tapping "yes" on the prompts to make the websites work.
The left pad issue was kind of wild coming from the enterprise Java space. Supply chain attacks against open source software were already being taken pretty seriously, my last company had it's own Maven repository manager running that was used to stage and vet packages before they could be used in production.
I internally tend to contribute SpaceX's success to Shotwell. Sure, Elon challenges the status quo of space companies and prompts "radical new ideas", but I think she is the force that makes it an actually viable company that isn't just a billionaire dumping money down the drain.
Pistol Shrimp Games Announce Free Stars: Children of Infinity
~15% at FAANG. Previous was about 8% at a startup. Before that it was ~12% at an F500.
Damn I literally built a really similar tool myself using HAR files just a couple weeks ago! Yours is way more polished though, nice work.

I have a lot of ideas in this space (some PoCs), and I've been starting to scope out a company around them. Would love to chat to see if there's any shared opportunity for both of us!
2>&- hides races in find itself

while ((getline li < $0) > 0) hides races in awk

in practice Name: is the first line so cmd is not truncated

Of course I got my test wrong though :D

$ time ./dumbps 0 >/dev/null

real 0m0.030s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m0.022s
Japan prays for a solid-state battery miracle
Cool, so this is basically reddit. Calling someone asshole is fine so long as as you feel your argument or superiority (or at least popular opinion) is sound.
I think this is only complicated because people aren’t able to hold competing thoughts in their heads.

There was a man who was massively effective in getting multiple once-in—a-generation revolutionary companies of the ground by sheer grind and lots of luck (yes..both). We should thank that man of yore.

But that man is now a convenient stooge for the right wing and a pointless edgelord whiling away his money on pointless projects.

Both of these can be true. It’s okay.

Here’s to hoping Tesla, SpaceX and all his other world changing companies succeed inspite of him and let him cement his complicated legacy.

Go Starship Super Heavy!!

PS: Shoutout to Gwynne Shotwell for being a massively effective administrator for this incredible rocketship of a company.
It seems like some people are claiming emoticons are retroactively emoji because emoji is the term people know now.
The point is that there are few side effects
Addressing Changes to PfSense Plus Home+Lab
Sounds like you’re not using tax law to your advantage
Check out my little side project for chatting with PDFs. You should be able to load most models including this one. https://github.com/clarkmcc/chitchat
You sound like you don't know anything about what actually happened or the SpaceX engineering process in general.

SpaceX knew that the concrete wasn't the final solution, it was always temporary, they had already started building the steel water cooled plate before the first test flight. Based on the data they had available from the series of static fire tests leading up to the test they thought the concrete would ablate and survive one test flight before they took the downtime to replace it. Do you have any evidence to support your assertion that Elon overruled all the SpaceX engineers on the timing of when to install the steel water cooled plate or are you Literally making things up?

Learning more by moving quickly and taking calculated risks is clearly the better approach, as evidenced by the current dominance of the Falcon 9 and SN 25 and booster 9 sitting on a repaired OLM and being scheduled to make another orbital attempt in less than 2 weeks.
I knew what it was gonna be before I clicked! It’s such a bad design it almost has to be a troll
Or crystal which looks more like ruby than Nim looks like python.
You could just sum it up for us all rather than do a divert to your blog?

It's Retrieval Augmented Generation btw.

To quote:

> The key idea is this: a user asks a question. You search your private documents for content that appears relevant to the question, then paste excerpts of that content into the LLM (respecting its size limit, usually between 3,000 and 6,000 words) along with the original question.

> The LLM can then answer the question based on the additional content you provided.
For any one that need to squeeze out that extra carbon credits
We had our main GCP account suspended because we were running a Lightning node, and some Google automata flagged us as mining.

We couldn’t get hold of any actual person at Google, and were told by our Google reseller to buy a fairly expensive support package to have our issue expedited after raising multiple appeals/objections. Suffice it to say, we run out of AWS now. I’ve heard GCP support (in terms of reaching an actual human support person/engineer has only gotten worse since then, and our experience occurred a good few years back).
Thanks, that make sense.

I think my comment was not worded properly. I was thinking "geometry properties = linear properties", what I really should say is:

Why does the latent space has geometry properties where we could use functions like cosine similarity to compare?

So when training, the signal will be mapped to latent space that will minimize the error of the objective function as much as possible.

Many applications already use cosine similarity function at the end the network, it would be obvious why they work. I reviewed other cost functions such as Triplet Loss. They use euclidean distances, so I guess it make sense why the geometry properties exist too.

For "and there I guess the point is it's not maximally information dense, so the geometry exists in the redundancy", what does "maximally information dense" means, I still don't quite get it.
You can’t chroot on MacOS without disabling SIP
its depends on your app, if you run infra on 100k servers then win can be much larger than cost of engineer.

Or if you write mobile app and became slow and laggy, then you lose users.
What are you talking about? About 20% of Israel population are Arabs. Only 7% of them self-identify as "Palestinians". Regardless of that, they all enjoy same rights as every other citizen. Which is more rights for the vast majority of them than in any surrounding Arab country. Imagine if you declared "US is a single-race country", totally ignoring existence of non-white people in the US. I think some might have been upset at such declaration, and even more would consider a person proclaiming such thing to be extremely ignorant.
I've been increasingly focused on the parallels between QM and how we build virtual worlds.

We have a number of virtual worlds where you have continuous spatial seed functions determining where things should be, but in a number of those worlds there's a feature of transformable geometry.

So they convert the continuous functions building out things like mountains or valleys into discrete units for which state changes can be tracked when interacted with by free agents.

Properly optimized, if these changes are not distinct from the state generated by the seed functions, the state is discarded.

So rather than focusing so far to the edges of consciousness collapse, I've been thinking more about the notion of free agency collapse.

That the universe converting from continuous wave functions to discrete units upon interaction (and converting back if persistent information about such interactions is erased) is tied to the inherent agency of the interactions. Effectively, if the consequence of Bell's paradox were superdeterminism, why convert to discrete units at all? Instead this may be an artifact of the existence of free will in how the universe tracks and handles state.

So whereas consciousness collapse puts a lot of heavy lifting on the poorly defined concept of consciousness and the subjective experience of the world, zeroing in on an interpretation centered around state management of free agent interactions gets to a similar result with potentially less amorphous baggage.
How is twitter failing? Usage is growing and they will be cash flow positive soon, that sounds better than twitter 1.0 was doing