skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_tape

It can be hard to tell what is "duct tape" and what is "speed tape" in software these days. An aircraft mechanic doesn't need to know the structural differences between the two - just use speed tape to be safe. Similarly, a pure programmer doesn't have to know the difference between ufw and Windows Firewall - just use the latter and move on.

However, an engineer (mechanical or software) better understand the differences in both situations
I was looking for the page on deadheading which was linked from your page and usefully gives a list of when deadheads have been helpful and when they gave been malicious: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deadheading_(employee).
If you happen to live in a state where naturopath is a legally protected term, with state licensing boards and all that, naturopathic doctors are legit medical professionals, and in my experience they can be far more knowledgeable and helpful than registered dieticians (who are also great, within their wheelhouse) not to mention many doctors. The naturopaths I've seen have actually provide links to high quality, peer reviewed research in presenting me with diagnoses and treatment options on occasion. The modern, licensed naturopath undergoes extensive science-based education and rigorous training like any medical professional.

If you live in a state or country where 'naturopath' is not a legally protected term, then yeah, proceed with abundant caution. You may well be seeing a high school dropout who has an unhealthy fascination with crystals, lol.
Hi,
Does MemGPT have the configuration for managing the GPT-4 rate limit (https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/rate-limits)?

I always get the rate limit reached error on my second message, and sometimes, MemGPT does not provide any answer despite that it did fetched some info; for example, see these outputs (I replaced sensitive data with 'XYZ'):

===

[AI] Hello Chad! Welcome to your first login. I'm here to assist you with document analysis. How can I aid you today?

[HUMAN] Enter your message: Help me to learn of how to work with arrays in XYZ:

[AI] Arrays in XYZ, huh? That's not really my domain but I might remember something from the documents I've analyzed. Time to make a query to the archival memory. Let's look for
information on handling arrays in XYZ.

[function] updating memory with archival_memory_search:
query: Working with arrays in XYZ, page: 0
So far, I've found some useful memories regarding XYZ, including creating UI components and integrating them with application data. However, none of these mention arrays
specifically. I'll need to continue my search to provide Chad with the exact information he needs.

[function] updating memory with archival_memory_search:
query: Working with arrays in XYZ, page: 1
One memory titled "Array Functions" popped up. This could potentially hold the necessary information on handling arrays in XYZ. But still, it doesn't show any specific content,
so let's keep searching.

[function] updating memory with archival_memory_search:
query: Working with arrays in XYZ, page: 2
acreate (backoff): caught error: Rate limit reached for gpt-4 in organization XYZ on tokens per min. Limit: 10000 / min. Please try again in 6ms. Contact
us through our help center at help.openai.com if you continue to have issues.
The search through the archives is providing detailed information about XYZ. However, it's not pinpointing arrays specifically. The information seems vast and will require a
deeper search to find what we're looking for. Let's keep digging!

[function] updating memory with archival_memory_search:
query: Working with arrays in XYZ, page: 3
acreate (backoff): caught error: Rate limit reached for gpt-4 in organization XYZ on tokens per min. Limit: 10000 / min. Please try again in 6ms. Contact
us through our help center at help.openai.com if you continue to have issues.

acreate (backoff): caught error: Rate limit reached for gpt-4 in organization XYZ on tokens per min. Limit: 10000 / min. Please try again in 6ms. Contact
us through our help center at help.openai.com if you continue to have issues.

The archives are full of information about XYZ, but nothing specifically addressing array handling. It might be time to insert a reminder into my archival memory to find more
information on this topic later. This way, future searches will include more relevant results.

[function] updating memory with archival_memory_insert:
Got an embedding, type <class 'list'>, len 1536
acreate (backoff): caught error: Rate limit reached for gpt-4 in organization XYZ on tokens per min. Limit: 10000 / min. Please try again in 6ms. Contact
us through our help center at help.openai.com if you continue to have issues.

===
No problem! I got a lot of the same vibes from this article that I used to get from Cracked articles, that sort-of-unhinged internet diatribe style of writing. Perhaps it was trying to emphasize a point where the Microsoft marketing team is making mountains out of mole hills (as that is all they have left) so he's likewise going to make a mountain out of a mole hill to show how absurd it is.

I agree though, it is a strange thing to diatribe against in such a way.
Oh yeah, actually I don't know how to search for quote tweets.
The History of the Computer
> 0. JS world is full of people captivated by shiny things.

I mostly write C code these days, so I decided to checkout node to see what it was all about, and the shiny thing is spot on. A number of things that I looked at were described as "old" by people because they had been replaced by the new hotness a few months back.
Ok, so, you put stuff in your backyard where it's out of the way. Your stuff, on your property, not even visible to other people. The city zoning workers use a drone to gain access to your backyard because walking back there would be a criminal activity, trespassing, and possible breaking and entering if a fence gate is involved, so they find a way to circumvent privacy and private property laws to illegally surveil you. You have broken no laws and they are not law enforcement, they themselves are likely breaking the law, and now, you have to comply with their orders and make your back yard be in line with something written in a TWO HUNDRED AND THIRTY EIGHT page book of zoning rules about how you are not allowed to live your life on your property that you own.

And your recommending that the solution is to become an expert in a 238 book, which is larger than some of the worlds most infamous novels, then, spend the rest of your life doing the recommended "If you don't like your zoning laws, you should get involved in local politics and try to change the things you don't like." fighting for years to get any attention on your issue, mostly being ignored because they already talk shit about you in the entire zoning department (I used to date a woman who worked zoning and they have nicknames for people, call them trashy, etc), then maybe one day, years down the road, you might get some compromised version of what you wanted, that still doesn't allow you to do as you wish on your property so long as it's legal and out of sight, and you've wasted a bunch of your life's free time, spent most of it frustrated, and ultimately don't get what you want and just say fuck it and go back to doing what you want and saying screw the zoning rules anyway.

The "if you don't like it, get involved and change it from the inside" solution doesn't work well in individual issues (or large issues honestly), and shouldn't be needed in cases like this anyway.
Stop ruining my jokes with facts!
We, collectively, are probably best served when asking questions doesn't result in an unrelated harangue.

In this case, the poster is asking about the claim that the orcas were hunted to be consumed by humans. You didn't provide any evidence that this is the case---and in fact suggested a reasonable alternative---so I suspect you also either question or deny that claim as well.

I think you've fallen into a trap. You've allowed the very people you are trying to rail against here to convince you that anyone asking questions is an enemy of yours and worthy of your derision.
We already have an inheritance tax why is there an objection to a person being successful during his or her life. Are we saying we'd be better off without Amazon, Google, Meta/Facebook, Microsoft, Apple? All of these companies were built on the vision of one or a small number of founders. They collectively employ hundreds of thousands if not millions of people. You who make six figure salaries slinging javascript would probably not have jobs like that without companies that billionaies built. Would they have bothered or even been able to do it if we taxed away not only their income but also their wealth?
Care to provide examples of such sectors? Thanks.
Yarn 2 was just a colossal mistake. In nearly any real project it causes constant churn and is just a perfect example of what happens when you let some computer scientist do whatever they feel is nice from a theoretical perspective rather than based in reality.

There isn't even any arguing with it being an abject failure. It's just abundantly obvious when you look at how many people keep using yarn 1. These patch notes even prove it since they realized how insane it is to make their zero install thing the default.
I no longer work at startups or interview anyone.
Most importantly: paying an exorbitant fee for adding a row to a database.

$21 for the chance of filling out the ESTA with the exact same data I used the last time.
And with 17 basic desires, I can make him wiggle his trunk.
> despite billions in tax breaks, regulatory favors, and subsidies, companies like AT&T have long refused to upgrade low-income and minority Cleveland neighborhoods to fiber.

There is a very easy solution to this. Electric utilities should be required to lay fiber along with electric. They can choose to offer internet (better) or offer fiber with a choice of carriers.

EPB in Chattanooga has been providing fiber to homes for decades.
> the world is global, if the US did this then alot of billionaires would suddenly move to Canada.

Yeah, just like how there are no companies in states with high taxes because raising the corporate tax rate will just cause companies to move and only leave small companies like Google who can't afford to move stuck with the bill.

We have a long historical trend of observing people moving to avoid taxes. Just ask Europe with its 0 billionaires.
Answers to things don't have to be black and white, yes or no. You can also start a process up front saying it's entertainment then manipulate people to the point the initial statement no longer holds.
I've been using TileServer GL for a while and it looks like there is support for pmtiles coming soon.

https://github.com/maptiler/tileserver-gl/pull/1009
Treasure of Begram
To anyone taking this line of argument seriously, please Google "Nakba" and go from there.
> just wait until they can only hire pilots from operational hubs.

Doubly not going to be happy if they have to live in bases in California and pay income taxes there instead of commuting in from no-income-tax states like Washington.
You can kind of do that already with the pmtiles CLI:

pmtiles extract INPUT.pmtiles OUTPUT.pmtiles --bbox=BBOX --maxzoom=Z --dry-run

--dry-run will output the total size of the final archive without downloading any tiles, so you can adjust the maxzoom from the default of 15 (for basemaps) until it fits under your limit
You can't keep the functionality of your software a secret and still distribute it.

What goes back to the initial reply you got, nobody every read a software patent to understand an algorithm. People would rather decompile and deobfuscate your binary. What has the added benefit that your binary actually contains the algorithm, while most software patents do not really disclose the thing they are reserving.

Algorithm secrecy was historically never a problem in software. Currently with the cloud and SaaS it is starting to be a very narrow one here or there, but since software started being protected, patents never disclosed the things they protected, and there's no movement on making they start to do that.
> Your company should also not be pressured to stop doing business with people because someone does not like that person

these people have the same right to speech that you do, why do you feel this right should be suppressed for them (but - presumably - not for yourself)?

if their speech is more persuasive then surely that's the marketplace of ideas working as intended, right? why should the government step in and restrict the rights of freedom of speech and freedom of association?
To ease die off, you could try supplementing compounds that break down acetaldehyde. Usually ALDH does that, but synthesis can be impaired. I‘ve read good things about Kislip in that regard.
We put the opaque in transparency lolll
A snappy UI is great, I love it.

But a feature complete product, with perfect performance cannot be sold twice.

I won't need to buy a PDF reader ever again, now that I have SumatraPDF, for example.
He was commuting to be crew on a 737 flight. No need for a weapon to kill a lot of people when you are at the controls of the plane.
> If a person swats someone, that person should be charged, whether its just for wasting police time or potentially endangering the victim or whatever the charges may be, send the perp to prison! I don't think you can or should be able to take down a website for the actions of its users off of the website, though.

Say you're running a flea market and you know the merchants there are offering stolen goods. You'll be dealt with as an accomplice to their crimes. Kiwifarms, 8chan, all the other "free speech"-purporting platforms are just the same in concept.

> I can certainly see the harm being done by the doxxer, but if all they are doing is revealing or collecting up information I don't know if that should be a crime, but I could be convinced.

The reasoning is that, especially if you're revealing information that is not being public (like where someone lives) or is outright wrong, there will be enough miscreants on the Internet that abuse this information to cause serious harms. People already have been killed as a result of swatting [1], businesses like pizza parlors routinely lose absurd amounts of money to "prank" calls (which are a crime, but not investigated by most PDs as the damages are way too small), and the "pizzagate" pizza parlor even got someone nuts enough to shoot the place up [2].

Therefore, doxxing and the upkeep of such material should be made a crime, if only to keep the general public safe from the multiple cases of stochastic terrorism.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatting#Injuries_or_deaths_du...

[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/business/media/comet-ping...
This just reminds me of my time at Geek Squad, when a gentleman purchased a new eMachines PC, used it a couple of times, and then boxed it up for some reason. Fast forward to 2012 and he's brought it in because the modern internet doesn't work with WINDOWS ME.

The PC was pristine, but the best we could do was install a version of Opera which supported ME and might allow him to access the internet with more modern code.
When did Tsiokolvsky become a sci-fi author?

The things in 1984 are the natural outcome of a totalitarian authority seeking control. Orwell simply made his predictions on a phenomenon that existed.
Because it is hard does not mean it should not be done. If they leave, they leave. One would expect tax regime iteration as loopholes are detected, closing them. Perfection is unattainable, but also unnecessary.

Wealth is simply rows in a database (public securities) or paperwork at custodians (whether private equity, real estate, art, etc). The same systems that would defend your ability to own can tax what you own. You can't own without government enabling it.

"Oh no the billionaires might leave." And? The world existed before such wealth accumulation, and it will be fine without them.
After the Germanwings disaster[0] and the near miss here, I wonder if it is time to re-evaluate the reinforced cockpit doors. Basically, every single passenger on an airplane knows that if someone is trying to attack the doors or otherwise hijack the plane, you have to stop them no matter what. Even if the hijackers have guns or knives, you still have a better chance trying to fight them.

On the other hand, a single pilot behind a reinforced cockpit door can bring down the entire aircraft.

0.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanwings_Flight_9525
I hope the pig heart transplants work.

17 people a day die waiting for organ donations, but that is a very small percentage of the true casualty rate.

In 2021, 695,000 people died in the USA of heart disease.

https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm
> Victoria courts have determined that both his company and _him as a person_ are liable for close to half a million dollars in damages for statements made by anonymous users on a web forum owned by a company hosted by a company leasing IP space from his company, regardless of their truth or accuracy.

Maybe Vincent should have thought of the corporate structure for his sole proprietorship more carefully, then. A PLC is not an LLC. And it's not esoteric knowledge that Australian law and courts are happy to pierce corporate veils, especially when they're token/illusory.
Kiwifarms specifically forbids doxxing, and the people targeted in your link were doxxed on a different website (doxbin). I am no fan of Kiwifarms, but it's important to keep facts straight when discussing it.
You misunderstood what I meant by "underpaid".

If a worker takes $100 in materials and builds a $1000 chair, they created $900 in value. If you pay the worker $20, then the employee was "underpaid" $880. That $880 is what is used to pay the CEO, stock buybacks, dividends, etc.

(I'm not suggesting the employee necessarily deserves all of that $880 of course, but it is the value from which the worker's pay comes from)

If workers are paid according to the value they create, then profits would be $0. (Revenue - COGS - Compensation). So, there wouldn't be money left to pay for dividends or stock buybacks.

Therefore, necessarily, employee compensation must be suppressed to afford stock buybacks and dividends.

My point is that everything comes from the same pot. Stock buybacks and dividends "could" have been employee compensation.

It does require the underlying premise that workers should be paid according to the value they create. I suspect you'll disagree on this, but I hope I've explained enough to share my point of view.

> This only shows that companies believe that unions are harmful for them. Which I support, as usually unions are bad for both companies and workers

Fine.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/how-unions-are-cruc...

https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/labor-unions...

https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/f46bc621-abb1...

https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0113/are-labor-u...

Please show me some sources that show unions hurt employees.
Looking at this test on my monitors I would bet it's the 'terrible monitor' before color blindness by a longshot, one shows pretty good color the other is entirely washed out.
But isn't that nearly defeating the entire point of the newer versions? They basically tried to go around the entire ecosystem, and having to not use the main feature that drove the development of yarn berry just seems like proof that it was a mistake.
Yeah I'm buying for the school district, so I plan to be there at least 12 years. It just feels bad leaving behind my current ~3% mortgage, but what can ya do!

There's new construction in the area I'm looking at, but it's well out of my price range unfortunately. There are empty plots of land that cost more than my current house..
Right but senior at Netflix/G/Meta might pay a lot more than staff at IBM or Samsung or Ford.

Just because they want the candidate to be a lead, but won’t give staff level pay, is not a reason to reject a job imo.
I never got those responses, but I think that swearing during an interview is not a good idea
Yeah, Twitter just changed how you have to do it (view post engagements):

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1715651443288396009/quotes

Paul also commented on it:

https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1716008561212379251
Biden Administration announces 31 regional tech hubs
I don't know where the POST code is run, maybe not the CPU ? Also, i'd imagine this sort of code to not parallelise the checks because it try very hard to be bug-free, so we are looking at a piece of code scanning the whole RAM linearly, I don't think you reach anything near the max bandwith of your stick of RAM in this scenario.
The problem here is that it does that at every boot, it should do it once, you maybe have disable fast-boot options or equivalent in the bios ?
I would say appropriately enough this at this level it becomes an issue of semantics, and pragmatics, and specificity,

results like this AFAIK are real (have not been found irreproducible, or limited to e.g. Russian), but, what they demonstrate is best understood in the specific terms of their hypothesis and findings—the "risk" or possible alternative being, to extrapolate the "pernicious" lay belief into some strongish Sapir-Whorf "your reality/my reality."

I.e. measurably faster performance on discrimination tasks, does not map broadly to "perceives differently." Your phrasing was appropriately nuanced, "influences" is a reasonably lay summary...

...but "Japanese-as-first-language speakers perceive blue and green as differently as e.g. English speakers" is still definitely much more true than the alternative.

Personally I was sad to learn strong S-W didn't hold up. It is quite a captivating idea. So too this popular middle ground around color naming.

I find it quite interesting the way experiments like this are construed to try to tease apart linguistic, cognitive, and perceptual factors.
Skipping over my question which is divorced from the court ruling and referring back to the article then.

Wouldn’t that make this ruling completely ok? Kiwifarms was a coordinated group of friends making sure others couldn’t have their own speech
This is an interesting video highlighting the potential for the device as an educational platform for kids without the potential for distractions like YouTube and social media to leak in. In an ideal world, I think this would be great. I am curious how long it would hold my children’s attention. Any activity that encourages making something instead of consuming is a positive IMHO
Thanks! I guess that explains the lack of reticence - it doesn't sound very fun though :)
I made use of the right to be forgotten extensively, thank you. Before that most accounts were undeletable.
You may be reading a bit too much into this. It's counterintuitive specifically because the results are a byproduct of their economic growth, and not due to environmental policy.
Can't tell if you're serious. Literally everything on their is either not unique to marriage, or made _worse_ by marriage.

I won't go through each nonsense reason in turn, but this one is pertinent:

> Accountability and Conflict Resolution
>
> Resolution Mechanisms: Marriage often compels couples to work out their differences and disputes in a more committed manner, as there is more at stake.

The opposite is true. People take marriage as a binary thing, and over-react to "last straw" situations. They get divorced, and that's the end. People in committed relationships work things out, because there's a whole lot of grey.

I've been in a relationship longer than most married couples I know, and I'm still seeing divorces every day at my kids school.
Maybe that would have saved everyone some time, which is a good thing
Is he so incorrect to think Australian (or famously, New Zealand) laws do not apply to him as an American?
Do yourself a favour and don't use manjaro or Ubuntu. Use what they are based on: Arch and Debian, respectively. They're the base for these other distros for a reason. They are the best and they fully respect you.
"Cheap" to be determined