skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
you could run your own dnssec servers (not too hard). and monitor the DS records for your domain at the TLD. have there been any reported cases of law enforcement changing DNSSEC (e.g. adding a DS record)?

i agree there's probably no way to keep a machine hosted at a company secure from law enforcement. also why i suggested storage and anything in ram on the machine can be considered compromised. this attack (swapping out network connection for a while to get a certificate through let's encrypt) was probably easiest/least intrusive. if it wasn't an option, the next easiest option would be taken. perhaps the options that are harder to execute are more likely to be detected, or less likely to be worthwhile.
Replying to myself to thank you all for the help!
Both. The govt gives them a break on taxes. They also pay the hospital thru Medicare and Medicaid.
> wait a week. Until then, discount everything

Your advice is really easy to give when you have no dog in the race, as a commenter said. I'm confident that once you have a problem with something and you felt you are not being heard, you're going to be caught with your pants down, rooting for the narrative that gives your grievance some space.

Let me share a story when I didn't wait. This is meant to be a stylized comment.

Months ago, a programmer got murdered in San Francisco, by what most people jumped to conclude was a homeless guy.

My best friend, personally, made national news by being murdered by a homeless person.

So in light of the facts shortly after the murder and my personal experience, I wrote the city supervisor and asked, what has to happen? Can you do something about "this?"

It turns out that this programmer was murdered by a person known to him. Why? The news suggests something about the victim's relationship with the perpetrator's sister, which people don't get murdered over all the time, instead of the far more idiosyncratic and too-many-coincidences fact that the victim developed a huge pump and dump cryptocurrency called MOB that affected a lot of powerful people, that funny enough I was also a victim of. That's another tale though.

I jumped to conclusions because I had a legitimate grievance. My government officials are much more responsive to social-media-viral outrage, perhaps rationally so because of its impact on voting, than something scientific, secular or wonky.

While I disagree with their primary grievance, I sympathize with social media users who read the hospital violence story and reacted to it aligned with their primary grievance.

We are replaying the circumstances behind Obama's comments here, which I found very striking: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/us/obama-says-movements-l...

> [Obama:] "The value of social movements and activism is to get you at the table, get you in the room..." When some activists at that meeting said they felt that their voices were not being heard, Mr. Obama replied, “You are sitting in the Oval Office, talking to the president of the United States.”

The people you're telling to "wait a week" haven't had their meeting with the president yet. It's the same energy as complaining about people blocking highways. My dude, they fucking get in the news, it works! So what do you want? How do people with legitimate grievances but are simply not numerous enough to matter politically in their communities, how do they get at the table exactly?
That's fine, but generally people on use that expression in a negative way, so I think it's reasonable to ask for explanation of why you think that.

In general I don't think it's fair to leave drive by comments like that without elaboration, as others might just see it and take it at face value when further clarification might reveal a misunderstanding.
After this change takes effect, will CLEAR be anything at all other than just a way to pay to skip the line?
The Bourne Infrastructure and the Non-Space of Bond Films
CDE is still a thing and it's free.
lol, I have to admit that's an interesting argument against ad blocking. I'm not sure whether it makes me feel better or worse about it though...

btw, do you think YouTube Premium will eventually include ads? Because the same sort of game theoretic argument applies there, doesn't it? If everyone subscribes to Premium then YouTube will feel emboldened to serve ads there too. Maybe people like you actually need people like me to maintain Premium's differentiation...

and about your "shrinkage" analogy - I could say the same about you, assuming you don't purchase the things in the ads. I'm costing Google money, but I'm saving advertisers money by keeping my non-consuming eyeballs away from them. If Google served me ads they'd just be wasting more money from advertisers, because I wouldn't buy the products advertised in them. (And the only counterargument to this is "well actually you might be convinced to buy something from the ads," which is basically an argument that I should submit myself to psychological warfare, at which point you've lost all moral high ground.)
> My concern is that we (US) aren't doing enough to seek peace

I don't think Russia is interested in peace, given that they can already achieve it unilaterally. And if one party doesn't want peace, I don't know what the US can do in this situation.
It's true, you can gradually default on the government's obligations by changing their denomination to make the underlying promises worthless. That's consistent with my third hypothesized path.

I don't see any way that inflation jumps gently in that case. I'm suspecting we wouldn't jump straight to hyperinflation, but annual inflation 30-50% would be my guess for the first couple years that 0% of government services were covered by revenue.
I wouldn't have an issue with sharing information with advertisers if it were solely for promotional purposes. However, the concerning part is that all data is up for grabs to anyone willing to pay for it, including scammers and the like. It's somewhat absurd that we have to protect something as simple as our birthdays, which should ideally be just harmless numbers with no potential for misuse. Unfortunately, the actual situation is far from reassuring, the surveillance nature of the internet is slowly taking shape. Sometimes I wonder if the digital identity problem could ever be solved and whether that will usher us under complete surveillance.
> if you wanted the benefits of E2EE with a popular chat network then that's a better way to go. Custom clients on the telegram network.

We already had that with OTP over ICQ/MSN/AIM etc. in the early 2000s. I could use it with about all of 3 other people.

And why stop there? You can always message base64-encoded PGP messages back and forth. Problem solved!

Except that defaults matter.
If you're going to infer from previous instances revolutionary Russian figures, why not look at Lenin? Or Trotsky?
Transparency in government doesn’t equate to anything we need to tolerate.
This post reminds me a bit of some games, which would normally be called "immersive sims". One of their biggest draws is how they let you interact with the environment in such a variety of ways. A blocked-off entrance isn't a set scripted objective or a tool for the developers to get you to go elsewhere - it's an opportunity for the player to find a creative solution.

Blow up the barrier. Pick a lock. Break a window. Reach through an opening to press a button to open another door. Enter from vents or sewers. Alert an NPC so they open another entrance to check it out. Shut off the power elsewhere. Etc.

It's so much fun to have all those options with how you interact with the environment, instead of it just being static and 1-dimensional.
I work to earn money, I work to feel useful, I work for the challenge, etc. I do not really work to deliver adtech or LoB features. That's just a (un?)fortunate byproduct of the process.
>This is a recurring issue, and IMHO suggests a systemic problem with their reporting, not limited to one topic or bureau.

It is trying to get story out as soon as possible in order to get the most clicks and as such the most money.
There are a few red flags for me here:

1. I can't find any information on the website about the company itself, where it is located, or who runs it.

2. The testimonials are described as being from "early Sol Reader customers," but I don't think they've shipped any of these yet, so without anything more specific than "Dave B" or "Maya S" these at least seem fake.

3. The images of the device look like renderings rather than actual images of the hardware.
They miss their intended target all the time.

There was a story just last week about a man who lost multiple family members and was injured when they struck his house instead of their target a few hundred meters away.
When I legally separated from my ex-wife in California, as I recall we had to check a box not to get restraining orders. Otherwise restraining orders would have been issued, I think against both of us, without either one even having to make any claim about any abuse or any risk thereof. Check the wrong box, automatic restraining order.

That may not be what's meant by "protective order", but at a minimum you should be able to get a protective order against somebody who, for example, threatened violence without actually doing it. That might be evidence of a bad temper or bad judgement or just general assholeism, but that is a long, long way from "beating the shit out of" somebody. Well out of "emphasis" range.

On edit: Oh, and really you could get the order just by saying that the person threatened you, whether they really did or not. So the order is really only proof that there was an allegation, not even so much as a nasty word.
OK, so I typically use DOIs in my bibliographies, although I seem to be in the minority for now. What next? You have to find the exact name of the author that changed and edit it. Let's say you do so (not a trivial undertaking since references do not come in a standardized format even if the DOIs do; by the way, arXiv doesn't understand bibtex). Now my paper says "Merton and Fox observed in [5] that...", and you know that Fox (one of the authors of the [5]) became Wolf. Will you change my text to "Merton and Wolf observed in [5] that..."? How can you tell that this particular "Fox" is a surname rather than the animal? What about acknowledgments, which come with no DOI or ORCID?
The Tech Industry? OpenAI is a part of this plan? Amazon?

IBM?

404media blows. Why is it everywhere suddenly? This is just another Vice/Buzzfeed clone.
As someone who works at a competitor of Apple TV, I truly don't understand the product. They don't go out of their way to make it clear you can watch Apple TV on most major devices,and they support fewer set top boxes/devices than their competitors. Part of the reason Netflix and Hulu have such good market penetration is because they make it clear you can use their product on your TV. Netflix (disclaimer: my employer, my views not company's, etc. etc. etc.) is particularly notorious for running on almost literally everything, including cable boxes and the like. Apple TV may or may not do this, but it is marketed as and feels like a much more exclusive service, hence the (erroneous, but totally understandable given Apple's hostility to other platforms) notion that Apple TV is only available on their devices.

I dunno, maybe it's a loss leader/retention play, but it's a deeply strange product to me. Right up there with HBO Max dropping the only part of their brand that anyone recognized.
The news as a whole is also certainly the same. For instance Ars Technica is generally just a lot of clickbait now a days, yet if you're interested in space/aerospace then the articles from Eric Berger [1] on there are absolutely top tier.

[1] - https://arstechnica.com/author/ericberger/
This guy shouldn't be calling himself a libertarian if his big idea is to hand over control of monetary policy to the US Federal Reserve.
>After all colloquially how else do you define domestic abuse?

The article doesn't mention what she got the protective order for, and there are several possible reasons that do not involve any physical abuse. Even domestic abuse does not necessarily mean he beat her.
I use those as well. I am curious if there has ever been a case where LetsEncrypt were legally compelled to create exemptions for domains as in ignoring CAA and not logging to the transparency log or to just outright issue certs to an agency for specific names. CAA account and method restrictions would be negated at that point.

The more I think about it I would wager that Linode and Hetzner were just law enforcement having good taste in VPS providers. It's more likely to me that LE was the compelled target.
> How does that make it easier to make sense of who is misleading you?

Easier doesn't mean perfect – there is no such thing as perfect here – but users on Twitter tend to tell a larger story about themselves, more so than the typical newsroom reporter, and from that you have more information to gauge their thought processes.
I was just thinking that peppers weren't hot enough.
Fixing people's opinions is very difficult because they are mostly made emotionally and the idea of a person being harassed or abused is emotional fire while the idea of an innocent person accused (especially since they are often people of "power") is often met with apathy at best.
Roman Elizarov (Kotlin lead) is leaving JetBrains
For some bizarre reason, someone flagged your comment...
Looking at the profile of your reviewer, it seems that they take pride in contributing to the deletion of several Wikipedia articles. It's possible that your article was just a collateral victim of this editor's penchant for deletion.
Yeah, he can obviously liquidate some of it, and use a lot of that wealth as leverage etc. but that doesn't make the graphic any less deceptive
That completely depends on if the founders or investors are walking away with anything.
In the beginning of attack on Ukraine I used to think Putin's days are numbered and finally this will be the end of him. But then I realised how it turned around for Bashar and how he has bounced back and is almost back to the path of as things were. Compared to him Putin is maybe a hundred times or more well placed to stay on.
> we don't measure each second each of us spend sitting on it so that the split represents EXACTLY our individual usage.

This is HN. Be careful or someone will build a startup on that.
Strong agreement
That's actually exactly what Netflix did, and cable TV before them so it's on fact highly likely
Debt is continuing to become more and more expensive. Lenders are not lending to people or companies unless the interest rate is much higher than the risk-free 5% offered by the US government.

VCs are not getting funds from LPs who all would much rather invest in US government treasuries for the easy 5%.

Public stocks are often bought with margin money (which is leverage, aka debt). Now, margin money lenders are charging a higher interest rate on that margin, causing borrowers of margin money to not borrow as much. Thus, stocks are not being bid up as much, causing stock prices to drop.

Mortgage rates track the 10-year Treasury yield and thus mortgage loan rates are going higher and higher. Housing market is expected to sag, if not go into a correction or a crash.

For the average person, the only parts that are affected are:

1. If their employer is dependent on cheap money (real estate, VC tech, growth stocks) these employers will either need to innovate HARD or start laying off people under pressure from investors.

2. If you were looking to borrow money for some reason (say, a house or a car), you are looking at insane interest rates.

But all of this happens in any interest rate rise. What is interesting about this particular threshold of 5% is that the world hasn't seen US treasury rates at this level since the last great recession. Most companies, stock holders, people in general don't know how to evaluate this new world of a higher rate. Should you buy that car you desperately need? Is relocation for an RTO job even possible?

Higher interest rates, lower investment rates can have a devastating impact on people's lives.
CEO salaries should be understood in relationship to the resources that they control. For example, this CEO chose to spend $85M on travel nurses to counter the union strike happening at a hospital in their network. Presumably the CEO thinks that this gamble is worth it in forcing the union’s hand.

That may be a terrible decision, but it shows the extent of resources a CEO of a $6bn organization commands. This is one choice out of tens to hundreds of 8-figure choices that this “super manager” will make in a year.

If you’re on the board of an organization like that, settling for a second-best CEO to save a 7-figure sum just doesn’t make sense.

I raise this for two reasons:

1) I find that people have no concept of how to consider whether or not executive pay is reasonable. One of my neighbors was outraged that our Mayor makes $450k. “Could she really be working 6x harder than me?” But our mayor oversees thousands of employees and makes decisions that influence hundreds of millions of dollars of spending. I’d consider her quite underpaid in proportion to what she manages.

2) Shaming organizations into lowering exec comp probably won’t work: there’s a strong economic incentive to pay competitively. Just bend the income tax contribution curve so that individuals who make more continue to pay more.
A second layer of encryption would help, but I don't recommend PGP in particular.

If you haven't heard, it has lots of problems and a lot of people recommend avoiding it (for example https://www.latacora.com/blog/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem/ / https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20455780)
SpaceX frustrated by Starship licensing delays
Then every talking head on cable news should be in legal jeopardy.
I can't really blame the guy if he got increasingly jaded as he got older. He used to be an actual comedian and even an actor sometimes and was probably a lot happier. Becoming a full-time pundit has to be toxic to the soul. Poor life choice, but maybe this is an opportunity. Disconnect from the 24-hour outrage cycle and become human again. He's probably branded himself into too much of a corner to ever be a public figure except by being a talking head, but screw it, what's the point of money and success if you can't take it and go live a quiet happy life at some point?
5.6% Yields right now for the next 6 months. Hold for 2 years yields drop to 5%. We still have an inverted yield curve. hold for 20 Y >> 5.3%
Trinity College, Dublin was founded on the 3rd. I would say that's a rounding error, but at that time, pi was known to at least 9 digits (15 would be reached in 1593).
> In order to avoid profit but still maintain growth, they shovel all their profits into network expansion. New hospitals, clinics, outpatient centers, wellness centers, all that in order to avoid lowering costs for patients.

Expanding operations reduces scarcity.

More clinics reduces wait times and puts downward pressure on prices. Supply and demand.

I don't even understand what you're arguing for. Do you want them to limit the number of clinics and take profits instead of expanding?
>...or we just change the price of a dollar. It's good to be the king.

> or cease to pretend that the US currency is a stable trading platform.

Same thing.
A fire in a parking lot + courtyard where there are many, many people encamped because it's a safe refuge in an active warzone? Even if the building is still standing, that could still mean hundreds dead.
Except that they are too cool to use peer-reviewed reasonable encryption protocols.

By switching their optional E2E encryption from their weird proprietary thing to the Signal protocol, Telegram could at least display some goodwill – but only making that the default would show that they actually care about their users privacy.
> If you have $TICKER that you expect to yield 5%, you wouldn't buy it because you undertake risk to invest in a company to get 5%.

If the expected value of the investment is 5%, that expectation incorporates the risk. There's a chance it yields -100%, there's a chance it yields 5%, there's a chance it yields 100%, etc. If your value of money is linear, you shouldn't have a preference between a(n individual) 5% investment with high variance and one with low variance. It's perfectly reasonable to prefer low variance for a given expected return, but it's also perfectly reasonable to prefer high variance; and of course a portfolio has an expected return and variance that's a non-trivial combination (due to correlated movement) of its individual investments.
All it takes to get a protective order is a allegation.

It is a common tactic that women use in divorce to file false domestic abuse or child abuse claims. It's called a "silver bullet divorce". Unfortunately abuse of the legal system like this has made it necessary to be skeptical of claims of domestic abuse without evidence.
I enjoyed the new Cyberpunk game, but one thing that did bother me was its lack of "Nakatomi spaces." Most of the city doors are locked and don't lead anywhere, and while the city itself is fun to roam around in, it all feels very on rails and with basically no way to "hack" the local infrastructure and environment – which I would consider almost a fundamental quality of cyberpunk literature.
That is going to the supreme court this year. Hopefully it will affirm rights.
Are there any services that monitor the certificate transparency logs and send an email when a new certificate is issued for your domain? That would alert you to this kind of MITM
That's wonderful. I used OS/2 for a bit as a young man and loved it. As a professional developer-in-the-making, I learned REXX as well (although in college we were using it on IBM big-iron at the time too). I can't remember what class it was, but I was daydreaming and wrote an arbitrary (integer) root finding algorithm in REXX one day. eg: show me the 6th root of 872378294, using a variation of finding a square root iteratively.
I think the best way to boost your sales/new users is with affiliate marketing, this is because you lower your cost to a simple comision, plus you tertiaries the finding an audience to the affiliate
When journalists hear hoof beats, you want them to think ‘horses’ not ‘zebras’, though, right?

When party A is causing a lot of explosions in general in land controlled by party B, and party B is broadly not trying to cause explosions in its own land, when an explosion happens in land controlled by party B you should have a strong prior that the most likely culprit is party A.

Journalists should be allowed to assume you will read more than the headline. Good journalists do the work to attribute claims to sources and they report that in their writing.
At least for Let’s Encrypt, you can also use CAA to require a specific account as well or validation method. This could prevent your hosting provider from issuing on your behalf if they don’t control DNS.

https://letsencrypt.org/docs/caa/#the-accounturi-parameter
I haven’t read about NeonDB before but a brief search of their docs doesn’t mention ZFS. Postgres.ai uses ZFS to implement the snapshots, branching, etc.

I’d be very interested in a comparison of the two.
Average is not a great way to measure about stock returns - though it helps illustrate your point.

Equity can evaporate -- unlikely US T will though the politicians certainly are trying.
Wow -- thanks for sharing.
That seems like a weird system unless it's required by some law. Why wouldn't anyone just take the unmetered PTO and then cash out the sick days if they can?
What does that have to do with encrypted messaging?

Also, both iMessage and WhatsApp support encrypted cloud backups.
> Smells of using the courts to punish someone by forcing them to lawyer up.

Though the publicity seems to be making it backfire for the police. I can imagine him getting a pro-bono lawyer based on the publicity. And the details of the protective order leaking out, etc. Streisand effect.