skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sigh... because I have all this spare time to devote another thousand hours into this game, right? ;-)
Clearly I’m the one missing the cue at this point…
Tech note (or horror story): the implementation guide's code at the bottom, which is also the code used to implement the diagrams on the the main page, is generated.

I start with hex algorithms written in Haxe. I use Haxe's macro system to turn this into an abstract syntax tree. I then use Haxe's ADT + pattern matching to transform this into a different syntax tree. And then I again use Haxe's ADT + pattern matching to transform this into Python, C++, JavaScript, C#, TypeScript, Lua, Java, and Haxe code. (I also have partial support for Rust and Lisp)

Unlike most "transpilers" I'm trying to generate code that looks reasonably idiomatic for the target language. I transform names and structure (e.g. `hex_add()` for a C global function but `Hex.add()` for a Java class method) and also transform for dynamic types (e.g. Point(x,y) can have numbers in JavaScript but I need a separate Point and FloatPoint for int/float in C++). This means I need to sometimes annotate the original Haxe-syntax code with hints about how it should translate into each language. For example, 1/2 produces a different value in Python (0.5) than in C (0), so I need to add hints to tell the transform code which one I mean.

I also translate the unit tests in this way, and run them as part of the output code.

It's been a fun project but it's grown out of hand. The past week I've been pondering refactoring parts of it.

The reason for all this complexity is that my original goal was to add a language drop-down on the implementation guide page. Then you could read the implementation guide in your choice of language, your choice of grid, your choice of indentation, etc. That was an overly ambitious project :-)
DNSSEC operators can be strong-armed the same way. You will also lose out on transparency logs.

In the end law enforcement can also walk up to the machine/hypervisor and steal/monitor interesting things from that as well. This is funnily the exact evil maid threat scenario so many (especially Linux people) find unrealistic.
ASCII arrow: own work.

LOL
Probably not, it's statically projecting (with fancy optics) an eink page out in front of your face. There's no 3d tracking / fast refresh or anything like that. Imagine something that mounts an ebook a meter out from your face, but in a small package.
That is so 2014, platform engineering is the new thing now.
It is faster. But that doesn't mean you can't drive thousands of miles in an EV. That statement is just as ignorant.

My average road trip charging stop is 10-15 minutes.
They all snoop. All of them. It's delusional to think they don't.
Surely this isn’t something you genuinely believe (that all of Hacker News readers have forgotten that propaganda exists). So why post this? Perhaps there is a deeper point you’re trying to make?
It's sad and ironic. Organizations that have DevOps as a role often have DevOps teams, which tend to operate in silos, which is the antithesis of DevOps.
I would start by sitting down with them and showing them.

Pretend your kids are the most important thing in your life and prioritize their growth because your time with them is precious and cannot be gotten back and it will be gone in a few fleeting days.

Maybe the web development sticks. Maybe it doesn’t. Neither is the important thing.

Anyway show them css because it is a way of taking them seriously. And because it means you’re putting in the work not phoning it in.

No excuses. No sending a link.

Good luck.
We would love to get this down eventually.
First, https://passel.email a newsletter aggregator and https://indiepixels.io an unlimited design agency platform.
The Mozilla Foundation[0] is a non-profit, the Mozilla Corporation[1] is not.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation
> The federal government spends 25 times Jeff Bezos’s net worth each year.

Hehe, this totally makes the opposite point from what you intended. The government spends that money on more than 330,000,000 people - some more than others. The realization that Bezos, one single person, is holding enough wealth to fund all government activity and absorb all taxes for 13,000,000 average Americans for a year is yet another way to get a sense for what a silly amount of money this is for one person to have.

> You’re crazy dumb idiots for thinking Bezos having money is connected at all to homeless and hungry people existing

Lack of affordable housing is the primary cause of homelessness, and in at least some cities where homelessness is extra bad (like San Francisco) tech companies including Amazon are the primary cause of housing inflation. I don’t see that it’s a stretch nor agree that anyone else coming to this conclusion is a crazy dumb idiot.

> in fact, I’d think you’ll find those things are negatively correlated — the USSR and Mao’s China had no billionaires, but boy did people go hungry!

Using other countries with other economic systems that had unique problems and no longer exist doesn’t have anything to say about why homelessness is increasing in the US today, this is pure straw man.
The criteria for creating an article in mainspace is to have made 10 edits and have an account more than 4 days old.
Thanks for pointing this out! I was using Containerise + Temp Containers. The "Default Container" section of Containerise has now replaced Temp Containers for me. In case anyone else is interested, here are my settings:

Default Container: On

Container Name: tmp_{domain}

Lifetime: Until last tab is closed

Rule Addition: *.{domain}.{tld}
> I mentioned this in the operators channel just now, but also worth noting is that channel binding (e.g. SCRAM-*-PLUS in combination with RFC 9266) also mitigates this attack.

Doesn't that require the server to persistently store user passwords in plaintext?
Another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iUvuaChDEg
I imagine there is an enormous amount of charity care (in dollar terms at least) from people going to the ER and never paying.
So are they the flat earthers of the IT world then?
It's quite likely that if you have two organizations - one setup as a for-profit company, one setup as a non-profit, that the government gets more taxes from the non-profit because the for-profit company can "reinvest profits" into whatever, driving the share prices up, which is (if done right) is a non-taxable event for everyone, as long as the shareholders don't sell.

Whereas the non-profit that funnels excess into income for the insiders has that income taxed at income-tax levels.
Yeah, that's rough as well.
NACS the DC+ and DC- pins are multi-purpose and can also support AC+/AC- (or, line1/line2. However you want to call it). There is absolutely no need to include a AC->DC converter in standard Level 2 chargers, and NACS does not do this.

NACS is slightly more complicated from a car perspective, as it requires the car to switch between DC and AC paths. There is literally no change from a charger perspective besides the handle, as chargers are not ever designed to be multi-purpose DC vs. AC.
Yeah, that seems like a reasonable assumption, but I still wouldn't cite them on it as if they had any special insight into the source of the rocket.
Honestly, I just loved him on the Daily Show. I watched an episode or two on Apple TV and it was terrible.

He's just an amazing comedian, but serious journalist. Not so much.
> It uses some custom language (SOM), built the AST/bytecode interpreters

SOM is the language being implemented, it's not used to build the interpreters.
> couples that maintain distinct finances

Is that an American custom, going as far as accounting for split groceries runs ?
How do you calculate net income when they can just increase costs (CEO pay amongst infinite other things) to decrease it?
I posted some IRL through-the-lens views yesterday on Twitter https://x.com/johnboiles/status/1715136868290081104?s=20
How does that not make sense. That’s what it is. Non profit has no charity requirements
Can you elaborate on how climate change caused this as opposed to it having very obviously been inevitably sourced from typical travel and immigration across decades?
i am not quoting any of that
Does MySQL have temporal? I thought only MariaDB implemented this.

https://mariadb.com/kb/en/temporal-tables/

A quick Google turns up nothing for MySQL temporal.
> So you get to choose. Either you have breaking news or you don't. But you can't ask for breaking news and have them verify each claim. It's just not possible.

This is a false dichotomy. You can have breaking news that covers the verifiable facts (an explosion happened in Gaza near a hospital) without uncritically reporting salacious claims by extremely biased parties.

Imagine if on 9/11 the press had within minutes come out and said, "Twin tower attacks ordered by Saddam Hussein kill 20,000, intelligence sources say." That didn't happen because the press at the time exercised some caution, yet they still covered the event.
I wouldn't think so. VR motion sickness is caused by "seeing" yourself moving in the VR space in a way that doesn't match what your body is doing. That is why a lot of VR games either keep you in one place (beat saber, space pirate trainer) or rely on instaneously "transporting" you around the world (steam lab, ms mixed reality). Games where you move yourself around using the thumbstick just like you would in a regular FPS tend to make people who are susceptible to it feel motion sickness. The other culprit is lag or drift in the headset image when you look around, which makes the world appear to be spinning.

All that being said, I don't believe that anything they are doing will create that first-person appearance of movement, so it shouldn't make you feel motion-sick unless you are using it in a car.
I watched one episode at a friend’s house and Jon Stewart has taken a turn toward Andy Rooney. Those looking for him to reprise The Daily Show are understandably disappointed.
>I don’t have a dog in the fight and have been a long time NYT subscriber but I concur with Nate on this one.

This is so, so untrue, and it makes me sad to read this. Your dog is the one dying of self-inflicted wounds, and everyone would be better off if it would stop. Everyone benefits when reliable information sources exist, they report on a wide portfolio of events under that reliable letterhead, and we know where to find them. The decay of institutions that do these things is the decay of modern society itself.
Yes, How would that be damaged?

Also, pro-tip, add water leak detectors if you're renting (or if you sometimes take holidays). It's cheap but it can save a lot of money.
Why didn't they use employee verification services? Or maybe someone should provide that as a service for remote workers only? Edit: I think usually such services are employment verification, but with better ways to fake being someone else person verification may need to be a thing for all types of jobs.
> misleading title

Definitely. The title of the linked paper is a lot more reasonable:

> AST vs. Bytecode: Interpreters in the Age of Meta-Compilation

it's a shame the author decided to go with a clickbait version for his blog entry.
Certain types non-profits cannot "show profit" even if it's just to build their rainy-day fund, or they're limited in how big that can be.
How many people are leading a 1500-headcount company on a zero salary? Even Steve Jobs couldn't do it without backdating options to make himself Rockefeller while acting like Gandhi.
> "Discover new worlds. Revisit old ones. Uncover fresh insights and inspiration."

... Forge meaningful connections. Ignite your creativity. Elevate your perspective. Redefine your limits. Embrace change. Keep exploring, within and without.

See, it's trivially easy to spout meaningless drivel with the aid of a LLM.
For what it's worth, the author addresses your questions here:
https://github.com/MKorostoff/1-pixel-wealth/blob/master/THE...
I'm not informed enough on the topic to speak anything near authoritatively but there was an essay posted here ~6(?) months ago that spoke about how >2-3% inflation effectively serves as a means of effectively reducing government debt.

I would imagine your 5% number has to assume some baseline of inflation and that 5% would increase as inflation increases beyond said baseline.
Spitballing here but perhaps it's because people don't realise the DevOps work that can be done in a team, rather than just what has to be done.

I work in a cultural DevOps place at the moment, and often spend my time improving CI workflows, improving the local dev environment and upgrading dev tools to make it easier to write features when requests come in. I could easily spend my entire week doing things like this, and it seems to pay off as we have a very low cycle time and fix bugs within minutes.

However if you have a non-technical manager - they struggle to see value in this work. DevOps becomes "the way we get the project we built into our production environment" which is usually quite a small piece of work compared to actually building the project. So it becomes - we don't need one per team, hmm, maybe they should be centralised so we can share their time between teams, and then you lose the culture DevOps was supposed to create.
That is a hilarious mod.
It was bothering me that you had written GORILLAS.BAS as I remembered it as GORILLA.BAS. I hadn't seen it in 27 years, at least, so I wasn't confident. Anyway today I had a look, and we're both right.

The game was called GORILLAS, but was in a source file GORILLA.BAS

Published in 1991, 32 years ago. Dang. It was pretty new source when I read it. At the time, I figured it was old.
And nearly got killed because of it. On of the bad guys heard him going thru them and ran a line of bullets thru it. The movie was great on tension. At any moment he could die, and die hard.
> Can one be a rationalist and still believe that, “the universe if fucking lit” and marvel at how wonderful it is? I believe being rational allows one to really experience the depth and breadth of the place we are in.

Based on observations of the Rationalist community over the years, I would say that it is possible as a rationalist, but not as a Rationalist, in that they tend to believe our knowledge of reality is limited to that which is endorsed by science.
Is this a reference to some specific, better, technique or an optimistic belief that such a thing could be built if only ..?
> The headline reads: “Israeli Strike Kills Hundreds in Hospital, Palestinian Officials Say.” Almost every word of that first clause is now disputed.

The death toll is definitely estimated in the hundreds. Below is a Guardian link citing US officials vs Nate's link citing a... Twitter thread.

In any case, I think the answer here is, until there is conclusive evidence from an reputable, independent third party (not a "forensic expert" on Twitter, not Israel or the US which fully supports it, not Hamas)... wait and see... but focus on the broader conflict and patterns.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/20/al-ahli-arab-h...
Oh, in that case I suppose I hate them now. Thanks for setting me right.
The Common Paper app[1], though not quite a git workflow, has always struck me as being pretty close to how an software engineer might approach contracts:

1. An immutable set of standard terms, with variable references.

2. A collection of cover page variables, that modify the standard terms by reference.

3. A structured negotiation workflow, where users "propose changes" to the cover page variables with automatic "diff-ing" (redlining).

It's not a product targeted to software engineers, but has always appealed to me as a way to sneak in some engineering best-practices into the world of lawyering :)

Full disclosure: I'm an employee

[1]: https://commonpaper.com/product/
Fantastic. I note it's indeed being designed since 2017 so it's probably not as easy as I would hope. The design seems to not have progressed beyond discussion at all in 6 years.
“yes, but you also shot the human shields, because you wanted to”
If those hostages are still alive, those bombs at least serve the purpose of letting them know their government is not sitting idly by.
>From where I'm sitting, once the debt service exceeds revenue, we'll have to get in a big war, destabilize domestic affairs with tax hikes (which are unlikely to work, based on Laffer curve), or cease to pretend that the US currency is a stable trading platform. I guess the third option seems alright for the rest of the world, except no one else's seems to be particularly appealing.

...or we just change the price of a dollar. It's good to be the king.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_monetary_theory#Governm...
Product Model at Spotify
Or Rust's `?`. The problem is Go returns errors by conventional multiple-returns/tuples, not by language construct.
Survivor bias, if you like.
Yikes, yes, I was expecting bad, but not that bad.
Yeah, companies under oppressive authoritarian regimes are so much more effective at dismantling oppressive authoritarian regimes... It's definitely capitalism that's the problem here.
I wrote a guide and simple experimental setup for this extension: https://tembo.io/blog/table-version-history
I thought you were trolling... but no, you are not.

For those who want to see more lens shots, you can scroll to "Product Specs" and click the 2nd tab "Navigation".
> Does defamation require the person to knowingly spread false information?

IANAL but there are certain criteria that must be met from what I understand. Knowing the statements to be false is one of them, but then there is intent and motivation as well as actual damages.

The reason that intent matters is that I could say something like: "Jeff Bezos is the type of guy that murders cats for fun."

The above is an opinion that is using colourful language. However, it COULD be construed as a statement of fact. So if Jeff Bezos* wanted to sue me for defamation, he would have to make the case that I was making a statement of fact which I not only knew to be untrue, but that I also knew was likely to cause reputational harm that would lead to financial damages.

* - And I'm asking to put aside the fact that Bezos is a public figure which raises the bar even higher, since people are more likely to talk about public figures and thus it is more likely and reasonable to get the facts wrong, to share personal opinions in ways that could be confused as factual statements and it is much less likely to cause the individual damages since most reasonable people kind of "get" this.
When "your" military officers are selling state secrets out for $5k in bribes [0], you realize there's probably very little you can do to prevent bad actors in positions of trust from blowing up any security model anywhere. Your only choice is between minimizing your risk with hoping for the best, or rolling your own everything and not taking part in any modern anything and living and dying alone. And even then, there's still probably going to be a file on you somewhere.

[0] https://abcnews.go.com/US/2-us-navy-sailors-arrested-alleged...
I am reminded of a South African court case I read a while back (which I can't seem to find now) where there was some confusion when a Japanese man was thought to be Chinese. Chinese people were not considered "white" but Japanese people were. If I remember correctly, he was trying to board a bus (or a taxi?) and was denied because of Apartheid laws but was later able to "prove" his "whiteness" by showing he was Japanese.

Humans suck at recognizing the human-ness of other humans.
You might get away with claiming that "convicted" was a mistake, or with claiming that you thought the restraining order was essentially the same thing (it's not; in some places those orders can be issued almost without even being requested). But you'd be on a lot firmer ground if you walked it back as soon as you were corrected.

However, when you get to the point of specifically say the guy "beat the shit out of" his ex-girlfriend, you'd better have a good reason for believing that. Or if you have an iffy reason, you better say what the reason is, not just state the conclusion as fact. It sounds like the kid had no idea what was actually going on.
Mastodon Is the Good One
You nailed it -- this is exactly what we want to do -- make the most comfortable reading experience.

This is the alternative right now: https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/blog/best-kindle-accessor...
Given Jon's constant fallback to "I'm just a comedian" when encountering any criticism. Ya it should be funny.
Here are comments from a quick review of this. I love what you have, but for me, it just would be too difficult to change how I work for it.

1. Font size in tasks to small for those of us with challenged eyes/big monitors. Don't see anywhere to be able to adjust it.
2. Notes - I am pretty locked in to note taking in Logseq with tags in notes, outlining, bidirectional linking, etc. My whole life revolves around notes that way including tasks, custom queries, etc. A lot of people are using this style of Markdown note taking on a variety of applications. I love all the functionality in this, but would for me an app like this with apps included that wraps around the note taking function would be good.
3. Only one gmail account. I tried to add another gmail to it, but couldn't see how. I am also using Spark for email which has a unified inbox for my 5 email accounts. I may be an outlier, but suspect a lot of folks have work and personal. Looks like I can have more than one calendar, but not email.
4. Search across email, calendars, tasks, notes, etc.

That's what I found with a first glance. I've used other similar apps, but I really like your focus on productivity, but for me, it just isn't a fit.

If you have questions or comments about my notes I'm happy to answer, but keep up the great work. This will be a perfect solution for a good number of folks.
It's an excellent feature. Are there any prominent examples yet of astroturfed fictitious community notes that overpower real information?
Sounds like someone hasn't really clicked through the multiple levels to find out what is wrapped up under “other nonprofits” (which is most of the categories of non-profits), and so is only considering political orgs and the three different subsets of 501(c)3 charities listed at the top level on that page.

Because otherwise I think that 501(c)6 Business Leagues would be a lot higher than Political Organizations on a list of things whose purpose is a lot less social/community than enabling private profit.
I’d say: if you have the option, go with Afroman… Better beats.
ELI5: What does this mean for the economy and markets?
FWIW, I started playing with something that felt like more of an 'app' experience with Beancount with 'Beancolage' so you could have plaintext accounting integrated alongside a reporting UI: https://github.com/seltzered/beancolage

It's still an early concept though, but at the end of the day it's a vscode-like experience so aspects like git are just an extension away.
Eye tracking requires a very high refresh rate, and this is an e-ink display which have very, very slow refresh rates.
US chip curbs give Huawei a chance to fill the Nvidia void in China
DevOps is the Dev taking part in the Ops.

DevOps these days is sysop+better scripting and less iron