skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Isn't more important that the known key does not change unless you made the change, than having the "right" key to begin with?
Lots of non-tech businesses depend on foreign skilled labor and compete just fine.

Mexicans just don't do software.
It's probably better to let the user/application decide what to do in these cases, and for this reason we allow them to register type-specific (de)serialization routines.

In the case of network connections, the user could instead serialize connection details and then recreate the connection when deserializing the coroutine state. Same thing for files, where instead of serializing unstable low-level details like the file descriptor, the user can instead serialize higher level information (path, open flags, etc) and recreate the open file when deserializing the coroutine state.
And here I am, still rocking 60Hz after all these years.
Amazon will now fire workers who refuse to return to office three days a week
Very nearly all wars are caused by economic/resource considerations. Xenophobia is used to get the citizenry to go along with it, but it is not usually the root cause.
Probably based on peoples lives:

Poor? It is awesome, your healthcare might be ~$40/mo

Work for a huge company? you're indifferent to it.

Self-employed? It is terrible, your rates skyrocketed. Trash bronze plans can cost you >$500/mo and barely cover anything. Good plans will be closer to $1000.
> provide the state with another $75 million in technology.

... securing their future income.

If I bought such a bad burrito from a vendor that I had to sue them, I'd probably stop buying from that vendor.
It doesn't look materially different. The program's UI has been stable for ages.
Ievan Polkka [video]
It is inspired by CStep app for MS DOS.[0,1]

[0] http://web.archive.org/web/20181007043810/http://cstep.luber...

[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20181007043810/http://www.luberth...
I'd rather port my Python code to Mojo and get, multi-threading, SIMD and other speedups
I just have folks use different auth in different contexts, not about rolling my own. Basically means using more passwords. Sorry, you need to login to each place separately. I offer a locally hosted password manager.
This is a deal breaker for me. Which is a shame because Hetzner has such great pricing. Oh well.
Why not just ((not p) or q), logically equivalent. ;D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5wAn-4e5hQ

This video shows a good demo of it with Halo on Steam.
Are they not?

I believe they voting mccarthy out in the first place was only possible because of the dems' votes
until you retire? that sounds too stressful. You can't delegate? What about bus factor? Or is it your choice?
Nah, it's not poorly managed. Python has a lot of problems. But they are all problems that stem from Python's success. The worst parts of Python are the parts that are hard to change because Python is so popular, so the ecosystem is really large, so every sort of change becomes harder due to backward incompatibility.
All of these things could, and usually have, as well be done by national parliaments. In fact many a time national environmental legislation has been kept back, waiting for EU legislation on the subject matter. (Which can take many, many years).

The main difference between a law by most national parliaments and EU legislation is that the EU legislation is usually wildly more complex, oftentimes to the extent that nobody anywhere really can understand it. E.g. take a look at the GDPR or the EU electricity regulation. You will be getting wildly different answers to many questions, depending on who you ask. And the reason is clear: The regulation is unreadable and inconsistent.

On top of that, one would be thinking that EU should be painting legislation with broad clear strokes, for the national parliaments to implement the specifics. But they don't, often the EU commission goes down to a level of detail that you'd never even see in specific national legislation.

I can understand how lawyers see this monster as a great. It's an infinite source of income. But for the average citizen and cooperation, the good EU legislation would have been much better, had it been implemented by national parliaments. And much of the bad legislation would not have been possible in the national parliaments, where completely obscure nonsense usually is read by at least someone, that will call it out.
The violation of self-referential consistency comes in when the Israelis engage in behavior which is commonly recognized at being war crimes, but expect to be able to fend off International judgement/disapproval eith the bulwark of a stigma tagainst anti-semitism, and that not agreeing with them or backing is somehow an act of thereof.

Every other Western Nation would be lambasted for engaging in the same types of activity the Israelis get up to on the regular with regard to Palestine. It's been over 50 years since they unilaterally flouted the Palestine Partition plan (the last Internationally agreed upon good faith status quo), and went about reshuffling their borders as they see fit, with the West sitting back and funneling them the money and Arms to do so.

I may not have to deal with angry rocket toting neigbors on the reg, but I also conduct myself in a manner such that my neighbors don't feel the need to lob rockets in my direction. Takes two to casus belli.
It's likely legally enforced, and any other provider would be subject to the same.
I actually canceled my cell watch. I love my watch, but I felt anxious if I got a notification I couldn’t act on, like replying to people effectively. Then again I almost never use my phone while I’m out so I don’t really feel any negative association with my phone.
Sorry I got confused.

That quote might be half flying above my head, and it feels a lot like a caricature to me. I got through the original speech and it still doesn't resonate, but I'm also not a Kenyon graduate and don't share any of that background.

But I appreciate having been exposed to that corner of culture.
The weight of evidence is against Andreessen's ilk being able to improve the world because what have they done since they got wealthy? It's funny how the garage startup kids' mantra of "lean and scrappy beats behemoth" has changed into "the behemoth shall do as it may" at the exact same rate as their wealth has grown.
> I take the dumbphone with me, the phone with the apps simply never leaves the office

Presumably they mean a smartphone without "the apps"
I find it interesting how the data on "ladder" vs "time with others" bifurcates. Expect its something with Extrovert / Introvert.

People in the middle tend to sleep, they don't get a lot of interaction, yet they get some interaction. They're kind of in the "not bad / not great".

Some people are super happy, and it seems to be directly correlated to Interaction++. Interaction++ -> Happy++.

Some people are super sad, and it weirdly seems to be directly correlated to Interaction++. And then eventually almost stop interacting. Probably because its always: Interaction++ -> Happy--.

The chart only really works till the middle, like the article's written from an Extrovert's perspective, like most of existence.
Didn't see anything in here about andreessen's egg shaped head, I think Ed went easy on him
In fairness to them if it's a lawful intercept then they have no choice. Non compliance can shut down a business.

Your only alternatives in that case would be the underground style hosters sometimes marketed as bullet-proof hosting though they are just shady resellers with bold claims. They do not typically last long. There are a couple I know of in Amsterdam that are right down the street from The Hague that have been around for a while so I suspect they are just honeypots.
The counterpoint is that more contact reduces prejudice.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contact_hypothesis
Alone in the Dark is one of my most cherished childhood experiences. I almost see the Vagabond in the library when I close my eyes. Thanks to the author!
Yes. No one likes a sore winner. Providing your customers with assurances? Good. Providing tips to Okta customers? Sure. Publicly chastising another company you do business with? Unnecessary. That should be kept private. Just my opinion
Don't even have to be about science, it can just be random little myths that spring up people try to correct. I happen to know stuff about firearms, got quite a few, from one of those places people can have quite a few. One day I'm scrollin down reading history on the M16 trying to remember something and I find the dumbest goddamn thing I ever heard, this claim the M16 got issued without cleaning kits and Colt claimed it was "entirely self-cleaning". I don't know if ya ever used firearms but that would never happen, and is the absolute dumbest claim I ever saw in my life. "reduced fouling" don't mean "entirely self-cleaning".

Now I don't really know how to use wikipedia but I thought it was one of those fake edits people might do as a joke. Went checking edit history and stuff to find out and turns out someone else tried to point out the myth too and some jackass with authority is jealously guarding that myth to keep it on the page forever.

Went and checked the government documents myself, among other things there is no Colt material making that claim in that context. Government also ordered cleaning kits, Colt supplied cleaning kits, so it's also contradicted by fact there too. Simple thing is there just weren't enough to go around, supply shortages, and someone at some point created the myth by misunderstanding that a design to "reduce fouling" thereby "reduce cleaning" don't in any way no hell no how imply "self-cleaning" in that way. Yet the claim remains on wikipedia, without clarification, because I guess some idiots repeating the myth in a book makes the myth okay.

I went and checked that book, too. No source of the myth in the cited book. It's completely fuckin made up and anyone with half a brain and a day using a firearm would know that, but there it is. All because someone, for some reason only God knows, personally wants it to be there and has the authority to keep it there.
Yes! Had a fun time with this one as well.
I’ve yet to hear a good explanation for how a fragment of a PIJ rocket could cause vastly, like an order of magnitude+, more damage than any that has ever landed in Israel.

But what I have seen is: Israel bomb UNRWA schools; issue evacuation orders for a bunch of hospitals, including this one in question; provide a number of inconsistent explanations and equivocations in the hours and days since; bomb the southern half of Gaza after demanding everyone evacuate the north. So I’m going with the most obvious explanation that Israel bombed this hospital, and it’s allies in the West plus a bunch of stooges like “the OSINT community” are muddying the waters and desperately trying to do damage control.
It's software i really want to like. Unfortunately, the long start-up time makes me more often than not use something else.
Defender eats server resources. Microsoft won't fix the bugs. Why would they, they can just sell you more CPU cores on your Azure VM's
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36975143

https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/like...

https://www.wxyz.com/news/local-news/investigations/after-hi...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37352486

just the ones within reach

civil forfeiture is also a problem in canada and likely other countries that i don't know as much about - don't mean to paint it as a US-centric issue
But the recommendations are good?
Yes, I misread your comment, sorry, having had my mind stuck on terminal emulation.
!(a) || (b)

It’s a very obvious spelling :)
This feels like a good thing - tying keys up in X.509 certificates feels like it makes them more complicated to deal with than they should be. On the other hand, now we're back to needing to have some kind of context around the key to indicate what it is. Are we to the point yet that a group with clout can just go write "the standard" representation for the common sets of these things that we can all use, and then deprecate the mess of other options? And can it be done without having to pull a dependency on an ASN.1 parser, or protocol buffers, or some other heavy library? Maybe just a set of algorithm names (text for text representation, an enumeration for binary), and a key use tag? Then each algorithm standard specifies it's own format for a blob of bytes that developers not doing serialization don't have to worry about? Like:

ed25519-pub <base-64/hex/binary>
x25519-sec <base-64/hex/binary>
es256-pub <base-64/hex/binary>

Then as a developer passing blobs around, I don't need to care that es256 is encoded X962 uncompressed point, but I do care that I see an x25519 secret/private key sitting around. Or I can throw a shoe if someone passes a signature key to a module trying to do a key exchange. As it is, SSH has its way, JWT/JWS does its thing, COSE has it's own special flavors, Tink does its own (rather nice) things but wants to me know how protocol buffers look...

And while they're at it, setting a single, standard, simple way to throw a hash around that for consistent key identifiers would be amazing. Also I'd like a pony.
I love Bandcamp a lot, and as long as they continue to provide great service and treat everybody well, I'll absolutely continue to spend money with them.

And "everybody" does include their employees. If a company doesn't treat their employees decently, they aren't a good company and I will avoid doing business with them.
It reminds me of a YouTube course on general relativity where the instructor went from most basic elements and built up towards a complete description of the full math. I was able to follow along step-by-step at the time but there were a lot of quite complicated steps which I would have no ability to reproduce myself.

I recall a few of the steps made assumptions on our ability to calculate. I think, for example, they narrowed down the set of all vector spaces to just those spaces that were differentiable. I may be mis-remembering the precise detail but it was something along those lines, and this was just one of a few instances of this kind of "throw away cases that we are unable to calculate" along the path. In some cases the narrowing was justified but in a few the instructor admitted that the entire reason we were excluding possible sets of solutions was because they would otherwise make the next steps impossible.
Sometimes in such matters, the customer is using the lawsuit as leverage to renegotiate the price after the fact. (I don't know whether that was a motivation in Oregon v. Oracle.)
Oh, goodness, thank you for that.
How does the extra user's key know not to reveal itself unless a warrant is provided?
Very early in my career, I said something about strings and a more experienced programmer said "that's because you think a string is an array of bytes terminated with a \0". Absolute lightbulb moment for me, and not just about strings.
This makes me think of that scene in Life of brian where they pick out stones for the stoning. I mean, how do archaeologists know that people weren't knapping stones for stonings?

I know the obvious answer is "the stratas and context".
I am responsible for spending several hundred thousand dollars a year with Cloudflare (out of my budget). I like this style. Don’t want to get called out, get your org fixed. This is somewhere between the third and fifth breach, depending on how you’re counting.
The fact that they were legally required to MITM their customers does not make them more trustworthy (in the sense of unlikely to do it in the future), just the opposite!
Of course that applies equally to any other cloud host (modulo jurisdiction games) but that does little to restore my interest in running my software on other peoples computers.
As mentioned elsewhere in the thread, RFC 8657 can prevent this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37958831
Why would it need insurance?
FWIW, I am a square-grid fanatic for tabletop games. Manmade structures just don't fit on a hex grid and 1.5 is a "close enough" approximation to sqrt(2) that you have 8 degrees of freedom instead of a mere 6.
This probably wouldn't be as expensive as you think.
DC lawmakers to introduce new bill funding local news with vouchers
I'm not an expert on type theory, but I would guess "Turing complete types" make type checking an undecidable problem, similar to how dependent types make type inference undecidable, since dependent types let you more or less encode arbitrary things into a type (e.g. p is a value of type Prime). That at the very least gives you an infinite search space, and the possibility to encode e.g. a halting property into types.
that depends on where you draw the line of free will. I know people who use that exact same argument for why they use tik tok. They "enjoy the time-wasting aspects", especially in down time. To me it looks like they're stuck and their happiness is suffering.

The problem is what we think we want is shaped by society, culture, and now big tech companies. Instagram made the goal of millions of teenagers to "want" to get more followers. It was always of their own free will, and yet I would argue it was a huge net loss for teenagers and societies.

Staying in touch with friends is great, and tech like this makes it so much easier, especially when in different timezones/continents, but these days I just think you lose more than you gain. The same for filling in-between time with a game. It's fun and I want to do it, but my mind in the long run is happier when it's given space.
That sounds like if I called the police to report something I think isva robbery, now I'm "police informant"? That's not usually what it means.
What good does it do to show them a better way? They are a monopoly that takes their revenue by force. What is their incentive to improve efficiency?
General liability. If people run one of their segments to compete, and something happens to them, it seems like Strava could be held accountable. I don't agree with this, but it seems like something that would have to be dealt with.
While your local library might not be conducive to chatting, the new generation of libraries (you know, the ones with few visible books) are trying to play the role of a community hangout like cafes or pubs. For example, when Helsinki opened its new central library Oodi, it came complete with signs hung that said people were invited to talk and hangout for hours, and shushing other people wasn't allowed.

But now that I think about it, that development might not make it to the USA inasmuch as that country wholeheartedly embraced the concept of "no loitering".
Wuuut, I missed they finally enabled it. Everyone who has infra MitM in their threat-model should look into and enable this.

Also, thank you for your work as well as popping in here.

Am I overstating it by seeing it as one of the most important milestones for Internet security in general over the past few years?

Do you have a take on DLT-based systems and if this is something that is (or could be) seriously discussed? It seems to me that the issues we have with PKI and certificate transparency could actually be mitigated very well if blockchain was seriously considered.
Lawsuit Against EleutherAI for Books3 [pdf]
I have no clue why anybody would use work slack for anything more than friendly conversation. The idea of using company-monitored communications to discuss dissatisfaction with your jobs is insane to me
Ask HN: How do I make my PhD defense presentation great?
I will be defending my electrical engineering PhD (in the USA) dissertation soon and wanted to ask the wiser folk in here for some advice on how to have a great and memorable (in a good way) presentation. The presentation part of the defense will be about an hour long and my field is robotics.

I'm fairly comfortable with presentations and know the usual rules about not reading off the slides, not having walls of text on the slides, etc. Usually my presentations are very visual with minimal text and I like to keep the focus on me instead of the slides, this allows me to control timing. I also almost always bring props (PCBs, protoypes, etc) related to what I'm presenting on.

With all that said, I've never defended at the PhD level before so I'd love to get some pointers from you all on what I can do to go that extra mile and make the defense great.
I do the same.

I have almost all notifications disabled on my watch (well, on my phone and computer too, be even more sparse on my watch). I'm used to screening calls via my watch anyway, so it's automatic to reject them. I could answer (or make) an emergency call, or even send a text, but it's so inconvenient, unpleasant, and public to do so via my watch that there is little desire to. I don't carry my airpods so it's just the tiny watch speaker and microphone vs the sounds of outdoors. No podcasts, music, audio books or anything.
The OP might be referring to the fact that there are 200+ million people in China over the age of 65, meaning they have the most seniors of any country in the world, even if this is a smaller fraction of their total population than Japan.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/250753/number-of-people-...
Amazon service just asked me to share a HAR file and I though for sure it was a security risk. Doesn’t that mean that agent has an authentication cookie to my account? Why can this be common with practice
>> I think he got it right

I do too, I don't see how you get air supremacy with what the US had built by June of 1943.

Maybe earlier in 1944, but certainly not a year earlier.
Yes, thanks for that correction, I was thinking of gopls.

Cool, I'll have to try out the kate lsp support.
> The blog article doesn't actually say the IAKERB impl will proxy to KDCs.

But that's all IAKERB does. There's two use cases here: proxying to the local, SAM-backed KDC for workgroup mode authen., and proxying to domain controller KDCs for RDP and RAS and what not where the [K]DCs are not reachable directly by the client.

(There's a third use case that they don't currently seem to intend to support, which is when you try to authenticate to a Windows system by IP instead of by name. In that case they could extend IAKERB to use the Microsoft user-to-user Kerberos protocol to discover the server's name.)

> Strangely it is entirely specific to Windows 11 and by extension Windows clients. There is no mention of Windows Server.

Steve Syfuhs addressed this on twitter: there's only one Windows now, so there's no need to mention "Windows Server" because "Windows Server" == Windows.
Israel saying that the hospital contained a Hamas base and their bombing of it was righteous and just didn't exactly help matters.

Since the IDF is known for hospital bombings everyone on all sides (including Israel) just assumed that they did it.

The fact that it wasn't the IDF is quite a surprise for all parties involved.