skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If the title bears no relation to the thesis, that's the author's fault, not the readers' for misinterpreting.

And this article isn't about communication and knowledge transfer, it's about the evils of abstraction. I'm not sold on the idea that layers of abstraction are always going to be problematic—most of civilization is built on layers upon layers of abstraction, with different people specializing in different layers. That makes things less simple than they were before the layers were added, sure, but it doesn't inherently make everything worse.
I had a look at what you're doing but I'm trying to understand the business use case, could you give me a few practical examples?
Is that false? I thought that that was the understanding from the get go, that for most people or was fine but that it was dangerous for certain people with pre-existibg respiratory issues, of whom there were enough that their sudden and widespread hospital admittance put a strain on the health service as a whole, meaning that all sorts of other issues that were normally easily treated became considerably more dangerous due to a lack of staff/facilities.

What is the true narrative?
I actually have to pay for Adobe because I need the features (signing, annotation, redaction, OCR etc). Does SumatraPDF cover those at all?

As for startup speed, it's not really an issue as Adobe just lurks there all day in the taskbar for me at least ready to roll.
Code review is part of the QA but code review is code review. Tell me everything what you see, don't selectively skip things.
I thought Google's given Bard access to the internet?? I guess people still don't think to use Bard over ChatGPT
How do you get the right amount of zinc? Are there other minerals you're supposed to take with zinc? I know that sometimes balancing one thing causes another thing to go out of balance.
Also widely told in Applied Mathematics departments, with the police replaced by an applied mathematician and the drunk replaced by a pure mathematician.
If i'm dying of cancer i'd take the risk. Hopefully though they'll have that figured out.
One thing is different from a pattern of things
WellRounded.ai – Transform Ideas into Actionable Business Strategies
Uint8Array has this too, but it's called `.subarray()`. The problem is that Buffer is a subclass of Uint8Array, but changes the behavior of the `.slice()` method.
The user who currently holds escrow can distribute those recovery keys to other accounts in that family/team/enterprise. This is why 1Password SaaS forces you to have at least one account admin (aka the user with recovery keys). If you somehow have 0 account admins, creating a recovery key -- without full decryption access to a vault, aka, user still knows their password & account key -- is impossible.
not "just" a respiratory disease
It could be as simple as just creating a special fork block that contains a sequence of every old block's new hash.
I would really like to be able to be able to pull data out of Salesforce, Pipedrive etc and into our ETL tool (Easy Data Transform), so that users can clean/reshape/reformat the data. However our software is a desktop C++/Qt application, so it doesn't look like a good fit with this. Does anyone know anything comparable for desktop (free or paid)?
db is not private. Check your facts.
I meant it figuratively. Safety and security certification at high levels often required that every module and function be tested. That was on top of black box testing and pen testing. Some practitioners added fuzz testing, path-based, symbolic, combinatorial, etc.

So, not literally exhaustive. They just covered every function, feature, interface, and combination that might trigger a bug.

Although, some rare folks did do literally- exhaustive testing of algorithms and FSM’s on 8-bit MCU’s since they had 256 values per variable. Others and I put timers on loops to force it to be terminating and just analyzed those cases. One could use exhaustive testing in the small to justify modeling a function with a specific formula. If you have several of those, then methods like Cleanroom Software Engineering let you semiformally verify the correctness of upper layers.

So, there’s some stuff like that which was used on an ad hoc basis. Most just tested values and combinations likely to trigger bugs since they were in ranges that cause effects.
But what do you mean then by "covid is sneakier than we think" if not to imply a casual relation?
This seems like it has some really cool ideas! This reminds me a little of eshell, which has some of the same features around allowing you to define shell functions in lisp. However it does run into issues moving between the lisp (sexp) and shell (string) boundaries.
the delay of James Webb 10+ years is the epitome of gov bloat and incompetence. Also the 6x or so budget bloat. Thats why NASA has a bad name.
Very good points! I was a little confused about what this article was trying to show after taking an algorithms class, but I'm glad to know that I can somewhat justify my confusion (:
So this means it can actually do things now, at least in principle, right?
The author of the video says that the Kelly criterion is used in investing, but that's not really the case. Kelly should only be used when the probabilities of winning/losing are known exactly. When they are only estimated, like in investing, the Kelly criterion is still far too risky. Here is a bit more about this problem:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-9JM9suCIHs

Unfortunately there doesn't yet seem to exist an equivalent to the Kelly formula which would apply to subjective probabilities. I haven't even found an explanation of why uncertainty about probabilities requires betting more conservatively than Kelly would recommend.
In the absence of regulation, goliaths will inevitably become monopolies and startups have no real chance to compete. The best a startup could be is to hope to be bought by the goliath.
look at my strong fingers that type the good things
Great now I have two things to worry about.
There is no penalty for being wrong.
I'd sum up here using your example of executions, because I think it segues nicely. I'm sure you realize a big factor in the reduction of executions is because we greatly limited the use of execution. In 16th century England things as absurd as vagrancy were punishable by death! [1] Idle hands are the Devil's workshop, taken to extremes. That's part of the reason I feel so strongly on this (historic crime/violence, not cars) topic. When you're that liberal with your use of excessive punishment, there's not much room left for casual criminality. And modern examples like El Salvador show that this recipe still works.

On the car thing, I think you made some good points. I regret dragging us down this line of argumentation which has been pretty strained, though informative! You were talking about light crime in general, and I voluntarily picked cars. That was pretty stupid. Anyhow, it's been fun meeting another impassive argumentative data whore. May our kind spread! And may we disagree again, soon!

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_Unit...
Because they removed local vaults (OPVault) entirely in 1P v8 and Wi-Fi sync relies on OPVault, yes.
religious folk and every other kind
The same is true of pneumonia, I believe.
Flammable fabrics, and a lack of fire safety education. The full stories of many theatre/costume/gown fires speak of people running around while on fire. The first instinct is to try to take the burning costume off, often not a simple task in the complex clothing of the time. A teenage ballet dancer in the 1800s, and the people around her, would have reacted very differently than we would today. Upon seeing the fire she would have wanted to get out of the costume, which would require her to run off stage before undressing. That is possibly the worst thing one could do. Stop Drop and Roll is no joke. It works. Grabbing someone and rolling them on ground, preferably with a heavy blanket or such, puts a fire out much faster than trying to get out of a burning costume. We teach kids about this so much that it has become modern instinct.
Google is bringing Android to RISC-V. They're quite capable of designing their own chips and even have their own phones to put them in, and chromebooks too. Not that they're going to change the world by doing so.
Worth noting that there is a very broad ecosystem of "Redis protocol compatible" databases that are persistence-oriented.

KVRocks: Backed by RocksDB https://github.com/apache/kvrocks

Tendis: Backed by RocksDB https://github.com/Tencent/Tendis

Tidis: Distributed, backed by TiKV https://github.com/tidb-incubator/tidis
Your browser is also automating things, you're not resolving DNS and writing all the http requests by hand.
Not sure with something that big but biologists electrocute smaller fish in rivers/lakes all the time so they can tag them. Mammals are different, but you're not trying to knock it out, only dissuade it from coming closer.
The current discussion is France wanting to directly subsidize existing paid-off nuclear plants with EU money because they are not competitive on the European whole-sale market anymore.

The other side argue France can do it using their own funds if they deem it necessary.

https://www.ft.com/content/b1dbd7b4-d8b9-45eb-bd18-4976f7c9a...
ARM has a team involved in accounting and finding "catch up revenue." This are royalty payments that were supposed to be paid but the customer "accidentally forgot" to pay but thanks to ARM's "helpful accountants" they get the money sent over.

How exactly ARM does this isn't always clear. For hard IP there is a GDS layer called IP tags and the foundry is supposed to scan this layer and can report numbers back to IP providers like ARM, Cadence, Synopsys, etc. If the customer removed this layer "accidentally" then the foundry can still scan for certain patterns and structures within the GDS mask data. Like a unique hidden watermark and report back to the IP vendor.

For soft IP that is synthesized there are probably other ways to do it but I'm not that up to date.
Always bet on Germany on the upswing. Make sure you cash out at the peak though.
Actually, just remembered why I haven't used it. Although it "Ships with IDE autocompletion", last time I checked that's only on the Go code, not the HTML. Usually I keep my templates as .html files, and find the IDE autocompletion and linter on the HTML more valuable
Don't forget the possibility of 5x 12-bit instructions. In particular, if you have only one or two possibilities for destination registers for each of the 5 positions (so an accumulator-like model), you could still have a quite useful set of 12-bit instructions.
We launched Dumbbe 2 months ago and now based on the feedback we got, we are redesigning the app. But we still need more feedback and ideas, so please if someone is into memes, please share what would you change, add or remove?
All feedback will be appreciated :)
Thanks!
>nothing works anymore.

Kids these days... Back in my day nothing f*ing worked and we liked it!

I'd like to load up a PC with Win 3.1 and some of the apps back then and let people today use it. Not only would you realize how much software sucked back then, but it required rebooting the entire PC to get the thing functioning again.
I just tried it (Chrome on Mac), and beforeunload is not called when I lock the machine. The MDN docs also don't suggest that it should be.
We are premiering our second video of text software
Exchange rates reflect cash flows not just total economic output.

Foreign investors poring money into a country will prop up exchange rates even without any changes in total economic output. Similarly outflows from foreign investment dividends depress exchange rates.
Yes, her response is as if she's seen something like the creatures from that movie. I wonder what really happened and why she didn't calm down.

For instance, it could be a hallucination, I've had some pretty weird hallucinations myself in spite of never doing drugs (auditory), they were totally believable and yet impossible and I'm rational enough to realize what is a hallucination and what isn't but if it is visual then it may be a lot harder to get a grip on yourself.
You know that small difference in the initial conditions of an entity can play a large role in the path it follows, and you further know that an entity which is spawned into a position where the light is very faint is less likely to be able to pursue it. You sometimes put new creations in which you have much confidence into initial conditions where they are very unlikely to survive, as a means of testing them (perhaps there is another "level" they are taken to to train a new feature once this stage is mastered). If they do not end up being able to pursue the light in those initial conditions, you might indeed let their information perish. But you might instead want to see if they could find the light when moved somewhat closer to it, as a way of checking if their ability is entirely busted or simply not as sensitive as you thought it might be.

> And if the goal is just to allow as many entities as possible to enjoy the light, why not relocate them all to be close to it? Why not save all of them into the next generation?

I'm not sure that is the goal, but regardless your machine only has finite resources, but is changed with presenting an infinite environment. Sacrifices must be made.
Although those functions operate on "binary strings", not Uint8Arrays, and there is no especially clean way that vanilla JS exposes to convert between the two that I am aware of.
I thought the same but OpenAI may train on user chats by default. Maybe if training's off, they could ignore robots.txt, or they could flag the content to be skipped.
> Like I said, my feed is identical.

I believe you, but my feed definitely isn't. Lots of the commercial feeds are still there, but most of my friends have moved on—not all to the same place—and the more interesting feeds I follow tend to post someplace else first, and then crosspost to Twitter.

> start talking about how Twitter is completely changed when it hasn't

This is very much a YMMV situation.
You know what, you're right - I did the classic passive voice thing. I should have written "At he didn't accidentally discharge the damn thing mid-flight."
`Uint8Array.prototype.isPrototypeOf` and `instanceof Uint8Array` do not work across realms (frames, Node.js VM, etc).

Feel free to copy-paste the function to your own code base if you don't want the dependency:

```
const objectToString = Object.prototype.toString;

export function isUint8Array(value) {
return value && objectToString.call(value) === '[object Uint8Array]';
}
```
People in the new world and old world were both human, so diseases were able to spread.

Aliens probably won’t be human, so their diseases infecting us is unlikely at first
Participating in capitalism is not an endorsement or a choice when living in a capitalist society. Do you call everyone who is critical of capitalism a hypocrite unless they starve to death for their ideals?
> the only solid fact that you need is that tech giants of the past are not tech giants today

That's far from the only solid fact you need to know, though. You need to know the conditions and circumstances around it all.
Stanford researchers challenge OpenAI, others on AI transparency in new report
Take the graph from the reuters article. Shift the red line down so the origin starts at 0. That represents the removal of the initial carbon offset, aka the "used Toyota" scenario. Notice that the new red line and the old green line now intersect at about year 2 instead of at year 1 like they did when the gasoline car included the carbon produced during production.

> Unfortunately we don't really have good numbers for this yet

Just survey drivers of 10 year old Model S's.
Even the Bard UI is worse. Being able to read the ChatGPT output as it's generated, instead of staring at a blank screen, is a massive time saver. And, I prefer ChatGPT trying stuff rather than Bard telling me that 'it can't do that right now' and 'we're trying to get better'. I've tried Bard, it's just not worth it.
There's no type annotations (outside of experiments), and thus no way for a "compiler" step to tell you if you're passing an array to a function that expects a string or something. The "strong" typing doesn't happen until runtime, so the closest you can get to this is writing a unit test that asserts on the behavior you want (assert that this method raises an exception when I pass an array, etc.) This is what people mean by "typed languages". Ruby isn't one of them.
Not if enough of the immigrants adopt the important parts of German culture. It happens easily in the US I don’t see why it can’t in Germany.
A lot of them didn't know themselves what they are, no clear idea what they were against.

Their biggest talking point was the vaccine would rare cause heart inflammation.

Covid also caused heart inflammation much more often and more worse.

It's like people arguing against airbags.

Edit: incidentally there's a whole other thread on this just seen

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37999349
Well, the average human nose is at least big enough for two bees to fly up and sting.
I get the GDP stats, but we already heard how Russia is weaker than Italy, and so on.

There is India, Russia, Brazil... Is Germany really bigger than them?
How do either of these still have any propellent left? If they were originally scheduled to last only four years, how did they manage to get launched with enough propellent to last decades and billions of miles past their original mission?

According to this article from 2003, the probes have enough hydrazine to last until 2034 and 2040:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2003/11/what-voyager-1-u...

Edit: this "Voyager Backgrounder" paper from 1980 is terrific:

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19810001583/downloads/19...

The probes were launched with 104 kg (230 lb) of hydrazine. But I'm still not clear why they were so obviously overbuilt for a four year mission.
I've been relatively unimpressed with the ChatGPT browse mode.

My problem with it is that it seems to run really obvious, naive searches. Most of the time I ask it something, then see what it's searching for and think "oh no, that's not going to return anything more useful than what I could have found myself".

It's also pretty slow.

I'm very much looking forward to having a search assistant which can go ahead and wade through eg 20 websites about home battery packs and show me a summary table of my options - ChatGPT Browse isn't quite that yet.
> unless the person doing the review is some sort of principal engineer mostly responsible for the code at large [..] In my book a general code review is simple sanity check by a second pair of eyes

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I don't agree either.

A typical workflow should be:

1. Engineer writes code
2. Engineer does manual and automated testing to verify things work correctly
3. Engineer commits, pushes, and creates a PR/MR
4. CI runs test suite
5. Another Engineer reviews PR/MR
6. Approval causes merge which causes deployment to staging
7. QA
8. UAT
9. Repeat steps 1-8 until everybody is happy

In this, we need to place checks on #1 and #2.

In my eyes, QA and UAT are superficial reviews/sanity checks on #2.

#3 is a check in #1. However, it relies on A) previous engineers implementing good tests and B) the current engineer doing the same. This means trusting people are doing the right things, but a Review implies you don't completely trust that.

#5 is a check on #3 and #1. They're essential. Having a full understanding of what the code looks like is more important in my mind than what was actually changed. The changes don't show how other code is interacting with those changes (which should be, but isn't always, captured by unit tests).

That's why I think the article author's preferred view is ideal. In fact, that's roughly what I work with when reviewing without realizing it (diff in GitLab/GitHub/Sublime Merge, code in JetBrains where most of the review happens).
Sure, but that doesn't mean they're used for towing. Across a wide array of business types, they're used as rugged cars with a company logo on them.
Essentially, yes. And that means duping a developer into adding your code somehow, since builds are digitally signed with a hardware token.