skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, that’s totally reasonable. I was and still am a supporter of the ACA and I think the price tag for this site was bonkers.

I just think it’s a shame that it’s politicized because we can’t easily discuss it as a case study without pre-existing political opinions creeping in. It would be neat if this particular series of events could be dissected in a vacuum. Government projects go sideways all the time but there’s a lot of transparency into why this one did because of the unique circumstances of its resolution.
Feels like it's just another way quantum mechanics non determinism bubbles up into the larger world. So not that all that insightful right?
Isn’t that how he started, before the hippy dippy weatherman?
This is how I use the tool the author created, Structurizr. I auto-generate the initial diagrams, then manually fix it to make it more readable. We then check-in the JSON workspace export into our git repo. The first two levels of the C4 model don't change regularly, so this isn't a frequent process to repeat.
No I really believe it can get better than this. For instance, since the demand for such parking spaces will go up businesses will pop up that will charge you a "small fee™" to live there, replacing a huge rent with an "affordable" rent. More lots will be built, eventually leading to luxury/tourist parking lots appearing which will create a dynamic similar to airbnb but for parking lots, eventually leading to the separation of nice parking lots for digital nomads/tourists that are too expensive for regular working people and dumpster parking lots on the other hand that are affordable.

Trust in capitalism, it gets better
Some tracks for all of you who are in the thick of it in this brutal market. Share your fav hype songs below!
Ea-nāṣir's revenge...
this content is not available in my region. what a joke
Deployments != unique codebases.
Counter-counter argument: A person creating a personal homepage has no obligation to cater to any particular audience. See, for example, jwz.org [NSFW when linked from here, very much on purpose]
Nice. I want to see this set to the music and put on YouTube.
Except no-one does this in practice. There's a half-assed exception handler at the top level that catches everything and that's all. At least in most of the code bases I've seen. Go encourages you to handle the error at the point of calling, which is good.
Is ubo under an open source license? If so, it would instantly fork.
>foreach will not be replaced behind the scenes into multithreaded version since it changes behaviour.

It only (meaningfully) changes behavior if you're both iterating over an odered datastructure and the body of your loop has direct or indirect side-effects. (like printing, writing to a file, making network requests, etc)
I've been spending a lot of time sleeping in my truck. I have an apartment in Colorado's western slope (and a community of folks I love out there) but I've been doing a lot of sound-guy gigs in the front range, 7 hours away.

TBH, I prefer to stay in my truck than be put up in a hotel room (which happens about 1/3 of the time on these gigs). I don't have to share it with coworkers and it's very comfortable.

To be clear, that situation is way different than if I didn't have a place to go back to for a while. It's also way different in that I get paid really well for the work, and a lot of it is festival stuff where there are a lot of traveling folks anyhow.

Most of the places I have been just feel so horrifically insecure.

If I had to rate most of the places I've slept in the last 80 or so nights in my truck, the primary axis would be "how secure do I feel about not getting kicked off this spot".

Followed shortly by "how secure do I feel about not getting robbed/shot/etc".

I have only been rousted once, and that was because I was in a ski resort lot in Utah (I had a 3-day pass and was on my way to a gig). And that guy told me where in the little town I could park without getting hassled. So I might just be overly worried about getting kicked. I have a nice truck with window-less topper, so it is hard to tell there is anyone sleeping in it anyhow.

After the last week of chilling in an industrial park near Denver (near a company I work for's warehouse) I spent last night on FS land near Colorado Springs, and it was super nice to not have to worry about getting asked to leave and to know that I more or less have a right to be on that land, as much as any other person here.

All that is to say that I find this situation much easier in the west, where there is a whole lot of BLM/Forest Service land; having clearer ideas about safe places to stay is probably the best thing that would help folks who are wanting to live in vehicles. Maybe the article says that, but I don't have access.
Even other animals have the concept of land ownership. They might not use our words, but see what happen when you take resources from the territory of a bear or other territorial animal.

Even trees do that. Eucalyptus literally poisons land near it to kill competition.
Thanks to donal fellows and miller puckette for having helped guide me through the tcl world. Having used it so much, tcl has been as indispensable for me as it has been obligatory.
they want you to be uncomfortable.
Is Harvest an important app? Implicit-flow open redirect bugs are pretty bread-and-butter, so it's odd to see one at the top of HN. Are people reading this title as if it was a major Microsoft vulnerability?
For anyone wondering, these are the seven words you can’t say on TV (or couldn’t in 1970?) and the actual monologue about them is insightful and eloquent.

This is just the punchline without the setup.
The consequence is, in the financial system nowhere you can put your money is safer than US government debt.

If you can deposit your money directly with the FED then that IS safer than government debt.

During a financial crisis such as 2008 money would go straight to the FED for safety forgoing everything else. This causes interest rates to spike everywhere including gov debt at precisely the time the government needs to borrow heavily to fix whatever went wrong.

That is why there will never ever be direct deposit with the FED because it circumvents one of the most important safety features in the modern economy, which is in the event of a crisis the government can borrow cheaply to fix things.
I asked this question about a year ago. Paul Le Roux had the motivation, the knowledge, the multitude of projects, the ability/drive to take on different persona. Plus Le Roux coded crypto projects in C++ on Windows unlike most of his peers.

The timelines also fit with Le Roux going into custody when Satoshi dissappeared.

Also with 100Ms in USD sitting in laundry baskets around his apartment, Le Roux would not have needed to worry about BTC until it was too late.

I had someone reply that Satoshi and Le Roux coding styles were too different: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33127079
For myself, I feel like I was really good at getting precise results from Google years ago, but it took a specific way of asking that isn't natural to most people. I learned that way of asking, and was able to consistently find exactly what I needed, but the average user couldn't.

It appears that they've "improved" search over time to cater to the lowest common denominator, in the process neutering all the functionality that I used to get precise results. So most people will have seen an improvement, because it no longer takes any expertise to use the search field well, but the skill ceiling is so low that there's no way to do much better than the mean.
This happened last week: https://i.imgur.com/EXzZqCl.png

Seems to be fixed now, but it reminded me of the early search engine days.

Funnily enough, when I used dogpile.com, it returned relevant results
Can I message you about your brain injury experience? Your description of what your life/experience matches my own, and I had several concussions as a child. I never considered the possibility my "unique" way of remembering things and speech patterns was linked to brain trauma.
“We believe Artificial Intelligence is our alchemy, our Philosopher’s Stone – we are literally making sand think.”

Uhh, does Marc Andreesen know how things went down historically for alchemy…? Or how the word “alchemy” is used colloquially?
They might as well be honest and say they want to sell your data but gdpr won't let them
This does not merely apply to Airlines. Spotify inserts annoying pay for Spotify ads that are almost purposely indented to make the listener uncomfortable.
How did you fill it with buildings? I imagine they’re not all unique?
Just because I’m set to be executed doesn’t mean I don’t care about being tortured before hand.
For the type of riding I do, which is just daily commuting in the city, I have not noticed any performance difference between hydraulics and cable at all. So the only difference that matters to me is how easy the system is to maintain and repair. And for me, cables win on that count.
She's been struggling with bad debt since 2001! I read this and can't help wondering _why_ she's still paying debt. Her credit score is already bad and not going to improve by paying off debts (it'll still be on her history, anyhow). I feel like she's too honest and hard working to consider bankruptcy, but she's trapped in a cycle where earning a salary isn't enough to live.

Isn't that what bankruptcy is for? We purposefully don't have debtor's prison. The founders didn't want debts to take a person's life. Here clearly is a person giving their life for their debt.
I know it sounds bad to shill a coin but someone has made a small modification to the Bitcoin monetary policy to make the block reward proportional to difficulty and created a balanced system where the supply matches the demand to avoid deflation. Maybe you'd like to come chat with us about it on telegram! The website is https://ergon.moe

Hopefully it's not as bad since there's no early adopter advantage and I don't expect to profit at all. I just want peer to peer electronic cash!
It's been deprecated for like 6 years now, too, right? There'd be no reason to keep it in the new spec, since CORS obsoletes it.
It's more than that. The story of the seven sisters is in many different cultures and the story is usually the same: seven sisters chased into the sky by a hunter. Most also have a story about the seventh sister leaving the sky or simply fading away.

The real evidence is that the same story exists in aboriginal Australian culture, and has been since well before first contact with Europeans. Most likely the story was brought with the aboriginals when they left Africa and has been told ever since.

Seriously, read the Wikipedia article or watch a video about it. It's an extremely interesting topic, and learning about it is a lot more fun than just assuming it's wrong and everyone is stupid.
Can someone summarize the article or something?
But the same is true with the concise code. Only with that you have to unentangle each chain to work out if it needs to be refactored or not, and that's hard.
YouTube recommendations have always been pretty awful, incentivizing people to avoid exploring videos on controversial topics once they learn that if they do so, they’ll be inundated with garbage on that topic.

The recent forcing of people (including me) to turn off their ad blockers was an eye opener. Holy crap, YouTube ads are hot garbage, and it’s embarrassing to think that any humans respond to them. YouTube has abandoned any pretense of offering a good user experience.

Worth digging around in the muck a little to watch something as great as this Dave Cutler interview, though.
I'm curious as to why this comment is downvoted?
How does one avoid this outcome under capitalism?
If you are advocating for "used food" as the correct term, there's another state that food enters after it's been used that you might want to be careful about disambiguating :).
A walk around the world should include all continents. This is a long journey home.
Any more than 1 microservice per engineer (as in, 7 microservices for a 7 engineer team) is too much for engineers to handle during on-call incidents.

If management values business SLAs that is.
Once they brought back the unlimited searching, I jumped on board and couldn't be happier. I only had to use "!g" to get live baseball scores. The quality is fantastic and I cannot recommend them enough
> I'd like to first start out by saying I've been aware of new developments but made certain promises to keep my mouth shut until all the parties were ready to announce. (Phoronix is not so constrained.)

I don't understand. Both this and Phoronix's coverage https://www.phoronix.com/news/Raptor-Computing-New-2024 were posted on October 20th. This seems unnecessarily snarky unless there was something more specific.

People rag on Phoronix, perhaps sometimes rightly so, but I've seen him wait for media embargos in the past.
I don't think it requires any QM to see. I used to have an argument that you could derive non-determinism from the resolution to Zeno's paradox, but i've forgot the steps.

Roughly, you need to measure infinitely precisely to give an infinitely precise value to a variable. Via Zeno, continuous time precludes infinite measurement precision (there are no 'moments') and hence infinite precision in measurement.

All chaos is doing here is giving us a bound on the actual lack of precision reality has -- I take it, via a zeno-ish argument above, that reality has to have such a bound.

Relevantly, none of this requires any reasoning from QM premises or observations.

This paper adds-to-the-pile cases where (classical) chaotic systems require measurement beyond-possible spatio-temporal resolution to be deterministic.
It's incredibly difficult to measure the work of a software engineer with metrics which are useful AND objective. You can have many metrics which are useful, but not objective. And you can have many metrics which are objective, but not useful (and often detrimental, like "number of merge requests" per week).
The Chaikin curve is a quadratic B-spline, which is an approximating spline rather than an interpolating spline. Chaikin is very useful for lots of applications, but the reason it doesn’t fit the stated constraints in the article is because it doesn’t interpolate the control points, and doesn’t “naturally” stop at the endpoints of the curve either (though it’s obviously very easy to make your Chaikin curve hit endpoints if you want to). Playing with interpolating quadratic splines is a fun exercise!
And what about all the switches, routers, bridges, firewalls, and whatever else in between endpoints?

What a strange thing to require. It comes off a bit like X-Y. You seek high performance. But you state it as wanting zero copy networking. There’s a lot more to performance across the overall system than that.
https://archive.ph/sabDi
Good vs. Bad in war is tue rare exception, even WW2 is less clear cut than people think, isn't it? After all, Stalin was on the side of the allies.

And what Israel does right now in Gaza is as bad as it gets. And Inam almost sure exactly what Hamas wants them to do. By the way, bombing civilian infrstructure and laying siege to civilians are both violations ofbthe Geneva convention. "Door knocking" or not, the result is some poor folks house is destroyed.

Actually, despite being inevitable to a certain degree, the Middle East and all of its conflicts is a prime example of a conflict without good and bad sides, isn't it? Which makes it so damn hard to solve.

Just a general remark, because press and media in Germany seem to have a hard time with that at the moment, not all Palestinians are anti-semites, critizing Israel is not tze same thing as critizing jews. And one can easily feel compassion with the innocent people suffering on both sides of this conflict without siding with Hamas. We should understand that, because otherwise we risk pissing off each and every Muslim for no good reason. And that wouldn't help, would it?
The many-worlds interpretation isn't deducible from just the Schrödinger equation.

The Schrödinger equation roughly predicts that if you put two detectors at the two possible positions where a light beam can go after a beam splitter, and fire a single photon at the beam splitter, both detectors will detect some "amount" of the photon*. However, what you actually see in experiments is that one of the detectors detects a single photon, and the other detects 0. However, you also notice that if you repeat the experiment many times, the probability of detection is exactly equal to the square of the modulus of the amplitude of the Schrödinger function for that state.

To explain this observation, the MWI uses an extra assertion: that each "world" contains a single result, but that the number of "worlds" where the state is X corresponds to the square of the modulus of the amplitude of the Schrödinger function for that state. So, if doing simple frequentist probabilities over these "worlds", your chance as an observer to be in a "world" where the state is X is equal to that value, as the experiments observe.

Note that this assumption is exactly the same assumption as the wave function collapse, known as the Born rule.

* the Schrödinger equation actually predicts something more esoteric than even that: for any two complementary solutions X and Y, there is an infinity of additional solutions of the form aX + bY, with a and b real numbers with certain properties. So, in fact, it is actually impossible to use the Schrödinger equation to predict any particular state. You have to use the Schrödinger equation and a chosen basis of measurement, and only look at the solutions in that basis. The simple idea of "counting worlds" from above mostly breaks down at this stage - you need an additional third assumption of assuming a pre-existing "background" and using Decoherence to explain why only certain solutions normally manifest.
Later "Lowering cost and dramatically reducing complexity with nanofunctions running on monoecosystem".
It's probably also a calculated misery: why newspapers don't want you to read their articles
Walk away from Omelas.
Popular money transfer app ordered to pay hefty fine for deceiving consumers
Everyone in the comments is mentioning Kagi, but I can't afford yet ANOTHER subscription service.

In the meantime, you should also check other free search engines. DDG gets it's results from Bing. Startpage.com is another good one, it gets it's results from Google and just has a privacy layer. I recently switched to Brave Browser and have been using their native Brave Search & it has been working pretty well. They use their own bot to actually go out & index stuff (from what I understand).

There's also Metager.org which is a meta search that gets it's results from several different sources. There's also a few others but I really haven't found much use for them or just get poor results.

Check out searchengine.party if you want to try out the really esoteric search engines.

https://www.privacytools.io/private-search
Married couple will have higher documented income, while unmarried cohabiting couple won't

that seems to be the problem then. i think generally, hiding the income of a divorced partner is difficult so making your first scenario less likely in many places.

and the other case would also require one partner to maintain credible evidence that they actually live apart and do not support each other. where i come from this is not easy to do.

if you live in an area where this is possible then that's a disappointing state of local legislation.

either way i doubt there is a large number of people doing this. at least i hope not. and it may as well be considered fraud.

i wouldn't bother reporting it though, because it is not going to improve your own life.
https://webstudio.is/
The Oslo Accords and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process
In-house AIs that do that for your confidential meetings aren't yet a thing for at least 95% of us.
In GCC you can already use (both on functions¹ and labels²)

__attribute__(hot)

and

__attribute(cold)

1. <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Common-Functio...>; Since GCC 4.3, released March 5, 2008

2. <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-13.2.0/gcc/Label-Attribut...>; Since GCC 4.8, released March 3, 2013
This doesn't exactly answer the question, but as someone who's done web stuff for years and who is an extreme fan of the GPL, nevertheless I end up using stuff like Divi and Elementor under Wordpress.

This, to me, is where the "paying for software that isn't free in either sense" has finally reached a fair equilibrium? Which is to say, thanks to the free-ness of the underlying platform -- it seems absolutely equitable to be like, "dig in and use the free but more difficult stuff that's out there, or just drop some money on this pay stuff (which you're also still generally free to hack with.)

I don't think very much software under "you can't have it unless you pay for it" is very good, but this is an exception.
So we're not going to ask for the addresses of the people that created these circumstances because we really should.
Knowing that group N passengers may be forced to check their bags, the pricing to put yourself in group N - 1 is your “calculated misery”. Repeat across other airline convenience fees like seating.
A room is $1k. Over 5 years that’s about $90k at a 7% annual return compounding monthly. So that’s the opportunity cost. But over that period that’s about $750k in post tax income which if you applied same compounding is 1.1 m. So that puts you at about 9%. Significant and reasonable if your car is already paid off, I suppose, since you won’t get that much for selling it.
Breaking the private keys to the concentrated wallet(s) targeted not the entire system

This doesn't make sense. I was talking about what it takes to brute force a single key.

but eventually over time compute does break encryption and keys made with those algos are no longer "secure".

This is not true. You are misunderstanding the orders of magnitude differences in modern encryption from some weak schemes of the past.

Are you suggesting as processing/compute increases, encryption doesn't get weaker from previous algorithms?

I don't think you understand what it means to need an entire universe of energy with the smallest unit of energy for computation and still have an astronomically small chance or brute forcing the keys.

The fact that some of the first algorithms used for unrelated purposes were weak has nothing to do with what you are claiming. Your logic is basically "some encryption from 40 years ago was weak, therefore all encryption is weak."

Encryption is a balance of compute/processing for encryption and decryption, too intense and the system is computationally too heavy.

The encryption and decryption speed is not a factor here.

So with that, over time all encryption will be able to be broken at some point following, as history has show so far.

This is completely wrong. You are extrapolating off of something isn't a pattern in the first place. No one thought triple DES would last forever. This is like someone saying 'we moved on from 32 bits of RAM addresses so we will eventually move off of 64 bit and 128 bit to 256 bits'. Orders of magnitude don't work that way. 32 bits gives you 4 gigabytes, 64 bits gives you 18 exabytes and 128 bits is enough to give an address to every bit of data ever created.

Your comment seems more like someone reading headlines and news articles instead of actually understanding what they are claiming.
I was a little confused by this...maybe i'm not expert enough at networking. I initially thought this Bifrost was related to the matrix bifrost (https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-bifrost) ...but don't think that is the case...I think because *this* bifrost seems lower in the network stack, whereas the matrix bifrost is higher in the stack, and more dedicated for puppeting users via bridging between different messaging networks (moreso at application layer)...?