skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not the first person to own my hatchback, but I'm not going to consult the previous owner if I want to repaint it. Not incorporating indigenous decision making is a valid answer to the question of how to incorporate it.
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

Actually your account has been doing so much of this that it's well over the line where we'd ban it, but want to at least give you a heads-up first.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
That's because the culture of the internet has changed. The innocence is lost from people, but i think reddit has swung completely to the other way, where people are no longer interested to debate, they are mostly looking for ways to report/ban you. It's exteremely cynical and lost its humour (unless you use /s you re most likely to be reported).

It will be interesting to see how lemmy goes . For me it is imnportant that it has an infinite Overton window even if it only happens on defederated edges. Popularity and reach is not everything, but the mere existence of all opinions is important
> Perhaps that's because the ... owner continually makes impulsive changes to the platform that most of the user base hates

So basically like facebook, reddit, youtube and every other social media (or other) platform?
You can't post like this here, no matter how wrong another comment is or you feel it is. We ban accounts that post like that, so please don't do it again.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Edit: you've unfortunately been breaking the site guidelines repeatedly in other places too. If you want to keep posting here, we'd appreciate it if you'd please fix that.
Is that how you see it, Andrew, as a bad idea? What makes you say that?

As in, what makes you believe that considering original owners would be considered a bad idea and therefore likely to be delivered sarcastically?
So principles doesn't matter when you feel jealousy? That's a weird stance to have. It reads as since you don't want this specific woman to sue or win (without even having read the documents), no woman should ever be able to, even in other positions.

Why not view it as good that an executive risks much to remove the glass ceiling, and perhaps prove biases in the processes affecting the whole chain? It reads as since you don't want this specific woman to sue or win (without even having read the documents), no woman should ever be able to, even in other positions.
Exploiting is a weasel word. They're making the useful minerals useable, which benefits the public more than leaving them in the ground. The reservations get what they're entitled to, which is nothing.
I'm in a suburb. Not an expensive one. Downtown is a 20 minute drive in light traffic. Within a 10 minute walk there are office buildings, grocery stores, shopping mall, gyms, parks, hiking and biking trails, etc. There are many cities to choose from; some are better planned than others. Based on your comment I would guess that you've opted to live in one of the "cool" cities in America.
It's Black Moon Chronicles Online: Winds of War.

I have client sources as I am working with the person that owns the rights.

Protocol is not documented, so reverse engineering, but having the clientside helps.

The server software was lost to time and accidents. But we have dumps of quest data, times, mobs, etc and all assets in original form. So as soon as I get the server in a working state. We have the full game.

We plan to open source/creative commons everything when we get something playable.

I've done 4 massive redactors as the code grows, to accommodate changes in understanding and design flaws.
Apple wins approval to use ultra-fast 6GHz band for Vision Pro, CarPlay, etc.
Perhaps you are being a bit cynical? There are certainly no problems that can't be solved by giving more money to government initiatives like the MaRS Centre in Ontario. These institutions also create jobs and are businesses of a certain sort, so funding them is supporting business directly.

And who can argue with the results? Several promising entrepreneurs each year take advantage of these critical programs to consult with pro-business advisers who assist in job creation by recommending they apply for 3k tax breaks.
Nowhere, apparently. Twitter number of active users hasn’t taken a hit.

Personally, I believe a lot of people are just sick of social media in general. When Reddit started turning to garbage some 3-4 years back, I started looking for alternatives. Found none. Slowly used it less. By the time the recent drama hit, my usage of it was already almost 0, and dropped to 0. Took a peek at the alternatives, judged them to be a waste of time and attention, and that was it. The niche that Reddit filled is dead for me.
In the case where the previous owner is still the current owner and they have a treaty with the government to that effect which is being violated by "giving you" the right to strip the car of the engine mirrors and tyres, what then?

We all like a good analogy .. but "previous owner" doesn't hit the mark in many cases of mining in the US, Canada, and Australia (for example) not to mention globally.
While I see the analogy you're trying to make, paul_funyun, I believe comparing the ownership of a hatchback to traditional indigenous lands oversimplifies the situation.
I am really curious about what kind of optimizations are enabled when you know the microarchitectural design of various CPUs, but without writing assembly by hand. I only know the basics such as optimizing data structure for better cache locality, add some fast paths, manual unrolling, but have no idea about how to work around things like pipeline stalls. It would be really helpful if you can point to some materials about this!
Resource extraction is a wealth concentrator. it takes what is usually a public resource and converts it into wealth for very few people. Very few countries have avoided this giveaway of wealth by the state to the wealthy. Norway is one such example.

We don't need to amend staking fees. We need the government to own significant equity in any resource extraction operation.

Our foreign policy supports Western mining interests in the developing world. Any attempt to change this seems to result in some combination of crippling eceonomic sanctions and/or a mysterious coup by an authoritarian but US-friendly regime.

Others have mentioned water rights and they're correct that this situation too is arcane and ridiculous. The "use it or lose it" water rights on the Colorado river causes us to grow water-intensive crops like alfalfa and sell them to Saudi Arabia (where growing alfalfa is illegal for this reason) and China.

I'd extend this kind of public equity scheme to intellectual property too. Most drugs are developed with Federal funding and are largely just given away, again as a wealth concentrator. That fruits of Federal funding should come with public equity in commercialization.
But did it not state clearly that it’s about strokes related to surgery? Many strokes are not related to surgery at all. Some forms of stroke were caused by forming blood clumps inside your arteries, thus blocking blood flow to vital parts of the body like brain (regions). Thickening the blood will understandably increase the risk of these forms of stroke, not prevent it.
I doubt you have the same emotional attachment to traditional values, unless its a Subaru.
Someone emailed to complain about this:

https://twitter.com/abhi9u/status/1715753871564476597

That is against HN's rules. In fact, it's the one thing that's important enough to be in both the site guidelines and FAQ. HN users feel extremely strongly about this.

Q: Can I ask people to upvote my submission?

A: No. Users should vote for a story because they personally find it intellectually interesting, not because someone has content to promote. We penalize or ban submissions, accounts, and sites that break this rule, so please don't.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

Don't solicit upvotes, comments, or submissions. Users should vote and comment when they run across something they personally find interesting—not for promotion.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Sure -- but why drag the entire organization through a perf process to accommodate those folks? Especially when they are tied to comp, performance review processes are (in my experience) about justifying decisions that have already been made rather than actually earnestly trying to improve an employee's growth: decoupling review from comp and then additionally not having a one-size-fits-all review process allows that coaching and mentoring to go where it's most needed -- and it similarly allows for positive feedback to happen much more quickly, broadly, and earnestly.
I agree with you in essence..

Having said that, it basically has nothing in common with the mid-90's code, either in details nor design. It's dysfunction is almost entirely modern by now.

Essentially, while CryEngine was a detour and got us where we are more slowly, it's ended up basically where they were aiming for in the original start-from-scratch scenario.

There is an argument that the more direct approach may have lead to less turnover and a more coherent engine. But IMO, the dysfunction is more likely the result of systemic problems at Amazon organizationally.
simply didn't pass the vibe check, sometimes it's just simple as that.

and it's not unethical or illegal. what we think is right and what we feel right are two different things.

maybe logically you're a great candidate, yet her gut feeling just tells her you're not a good fit there.
Did you purchase it outright or have the previous owners murdered?
you understand that i can easily say the same thing, and that i m getting the all-so-usual response where people avoid the argument completely by trying t paint you as some kind of kremlin propaganda.
Have you tried TextEdit? It supports both rich text editing and code editing.

https://support.apple.com/guide/textedit/work-with-html-docu...
Thank you for the feedback.

If anyone is wondering, one reason that Robinson Crusoe and The Mysteries of Udolpho are not "apex books" is that they are both dominated by the Iliad.

* The Iliad by Homer (-700) — 432,847 ratings — 3.90 average

* Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe (1719) — 297,130 ratings — 3.68 average

* The Mysteries of Udolpho by Ann Radcliffe (1794) — 15,120 ratings — 3.40 average

The Iliad is older, has more ratings, and has a higher average rating than either of them. It therefore "dominates" them in the sense defined on the page.

(I am not questioning the merits of these works, just explaining why they are not on the list.)
orange crab another option
> Unless your data is fully encrypted or stored locally by you, the government often can get it from a communications or computing company.

> Traditionally, that required a court order. But increasingly, the government just buys it from data brokers who bought it from the adtech industry.

I presume the adtech industry includes Meta and Google. But some people (even here) get indignant and say “no, Meta doesn’t really sell your data” or “no, Google doesn’t really sell your data”. If these companies are participating in this ecosystem and buying from data brokers, they’re just as evil as the data brokers. Let’s not pretend that Meta and Google are saints who should not be criticized for making most of their money from these relationships and enabling surveillance.
Freedom of speech, the marketplace of ideas, when it comes down to it the West means none of it.
The number of instances people getting "cancelled" for expressing widely held views on this conflict is crazy - the exercise of establishment power is on full display.
In the end, I think it's almost impossible to say anything meaningful about individual cases. Fact is that in a lot of companies salary varies, sometimes quite wildly, based on all sorts of factors: how well you negotiated, how badly the position was needed at the time of hiring, the mood of the hiring manager that day, how much of the budget was used that year, how well the company is doing at the time of hiring, stellar alignment, etc. It's very hard to say which factor played a part. This is true for most roles and not limited to the executive level.

The law states that (from the judge's opinion): "Rowe must demonstrate that Google failed to pay her equally to a man in the same geographic area for (a) equal work on a job the performance of which requires equal skill, effort and responsibility, and which is performed under similar working conditions, or (b) substantially similar work, when viewed as a composite of skill, effort, and responsibility, and performed under similar working conditions.", but this is kind of an unreasonable standard to really prove gender discrimination IMHO.

So any male getting paid more than any female can only be explained by discrimination? In some cases it's probably a factor. In others: probably not? Hard to distinguish the two however.

All we can really do is statistics over a large group, and then say something about that group. But that says nothing about individuals. There are short Dutch people, tall Indonesians, and Germans with a sense of humour.
Used the five commands in the order presented, nothing happened. I guess this is a puzzle and not a demo. And on to the next thing I guess.
The CBC is little more than crass government propaganda at this point. Canada in general should be viewed as a cautionary tale for anyone who thinks more government intervention in our lives, is a good thing.
Many of the programs to help with housing affordability is making it easier for first-time homebuyers to get enough money for a downpayment. There is tax break for first-time buyers, the ability to borrow money from your own RRSP and most recently the FHSA (First Home Savings Account). Long term this increases home prices by injecting more money into the system.
This probably merits a long piece at some point, but recording every meeting has been transformative for us: it's zero time and energy (you just need someone to hit the record button!) and it gives engineers the freedom to not be in a meeting for fear of what will be done in their absence (a surprisingly common motive for attending a meeting!). As for going back through meetings: yes, we definitely do (for a variety of reasons), though the distribution is lumpy (and most meetings are likely never listened to again).
"Finally, in recent months we have significantly expanded our implementation of NewsGuard, which enables people to learn more about an online news source before consuming its content. NewsGuard operates a team of experienced journalists who rate online news websites on the basis of nine journalistic integrity criteria, which they use to create both a 'nutrition label' and a red/green rating for each rated news website. People can access NewsGuard’s service by downloading a simple browser extension, which is available for all standard browsers. It is free for users of the Microsoft Edge browser. Importantly, Microsoft has no editorial control over any of NewsGuard’s ratings and the NewsGuard browser extension does not limit access to information in any way. Instead, NewsGuard aims to provide greater transparency and encourage media literacy by providing important context about the news source itself."

Though, trusting Big Tech may be kind of a leap of faith. Might be also worth reverse engineering the browser extension in order to see what kind of profiling they're doing. Already from the privacy policy [1] one can conclude that they're collecting extensive amounts of personal data.

[1] https://www.newsguardtech.com/privacy-policy/
Maybe I'm a bit weird but I immediately thought of MacBeth

Bring it after me.
I will not be afraid of death and bane,
Till Birnam forest come to Dunsinane.
'Reddit can survive without search' company reportedly threatens to block Google
Sounds amazing! Did you implement congestion control per connection, and if so, which algorithms did you use? I can imagine that CC could really affect throughput at this scale.
Generally I approve of this type of thinking, it's how I got my start, too. So I'm only quibbling to improve the fidelity of the model for those who are like us.

1) My impression is that it's prettttty tough to get those 10% down mortgages these days. Though, again, that's behind me now, I could be wrong.

2) The bank will not consider your accom to be mortgage-minus-sublet-rent for the stress test, I promise you. They'll count your rent as additional income, at some discount (fuck you, bank), and then count 30% of that against your mortgage payment (for the stress test). I guess if you know someone who actually got this past the bank stress test then let us know, and let us know which bank, because I'll move the next time my mortgage comes up. But I have tried in the past. So you'd need a joint income of 200k (I trusted your estimate of mortgage at present rates on $810k), minus 10k/a for the rent, is $95k each, $46/h.

Still. Although it is definitely difficult, it is, as you say doable.
That looks pretty cool. Whenever I see the words "prolog-style" I always ctrl+f for "cut", and this one passes!
I've bought everything they've made, but they don't have great customer support.

The only shipping they do is extremely expensive express shipping internationally. They had some adapters that were previously OOS come available, but the Pocket system was OOS. I emailed them, asking them if I could buy the adapters, have them put them aside, and reserve the Pocket, and have them ship it all at once whenever the Pocket was in stock. I even offered to pay it all up front so they weren't put out. They basically (politely) told me to suck it up, and buy both, and pay ~ 100 AUD each time to ship them express, separately.
ditch your phone , go back to your desktop, problem solve. Mobile has been a regression in pretty much everything except corporate profits.

The focus of the article is wrong. PCs for example are not getting more specialized, they are getting new capabilities with the additional specialized gpus. As others have said the problem does not lie in processors, but on the software and UI, which has been steadily dumbing down since "smart"phones have been introduced. Phones have perfectly capable general computing processors but corporate decisions limit their usage.
Developing good framework (does not have to be multi processing) is generally hard. Having decent subject understanding and knowing how to use said frameworks is not a rocket science. And there is a difference between "easy-peasy (tm)" and not being lazy and learning some basics
How to Build a User-Level CPU Profiler (2013)
Do they currently?
That you need to drive to downtown suggests you might not have much garage space after all?
Bruce Schneier: On the Cybersecurity Jobs Shortage
Having an explanation doesn't mean it isn't a weird anomaly.
> uhhhh, I'd say that inefficiency is intentional for firearms because they just want it to be difficult/time-consuming/delayed to acquire/possess firearms. Then they can justify increasing the fees because "they need to recover the costs of program operation".

Kinda doubt it, there's already a mandatory wait time for getting your license. If anything Ottawa wanted them to process the paper work faster, I just don't know if they could have done so.

Circa early 2000's the Canadians were in the process of trying to get long guns registered (handguns and some other types of firearms always had to be registered), but it turned into a debacle. The cost to build the program should've been $119 million, with fees covering $117 million. The cost that the auditor general found was $140 million registration fees trying to cover $1 billion in costs that she could account for at the time. Didn't help that her team didn't have time to crunch the numbers. CBC went in and estimated that it was closer to $2 billion dollars[2].

The program was already controversial in the first place, but the problems just kept getting problem after problem thrown at it. In protest a man named Brian Richard Buckley sent in firearms registration for a Black and Decker soldering heat gun. There were already huge error rate in the registry at the time; something like 70% error rate of licenses and 90% error rate for registrations but that little stunt he pulled revealed a much deeper problem occurring. I can't find the article anymore but the backlog had become so severe that the staff were instructed to no longer validate any of the information they were getting, even if it didn't make sense.

All that to say that say, if things were being run inefficiently intentionally, that probably would've just given even more opposition even more ammunition to embarrass the government at a time when they were already taking a beating about the mismanagement of the new firearms program. So I sincerely doubt it was a mandate.

[1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/auditor-general-takes-aim-at-...

[2] https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/gun-registry-cost-soars-to-2-...
Except its all bullshit because the dude hasn't obviously lost anything.

He's got a family friends, and one of the world's largest and most succesful companies.
I found the references to god and religion in a technical article off-putting as well. I tried hard to think of it as an attempt at humor, but I could not shake the feeling that the writer was a very religious person. I tend to value the
technical opinions of deeply religious people less.

If you actually believe in magic, then I am going to have a hard time trusting you with anything critical.
it's definitely not free, but unlikely to be prohibitively expensive

https://www.startupblog.com/sec-approves-token-sale-through-...
They caused it by racing to the bottom. They could fix it, but won’t.
Nonsense. Don’t spread misinformation.
yeah, but in 1975 the average household income was 50k. Now its 92k. The cost of a house in Toronto (and everywhere in Ontario) went from being 60k (120% of annual average family income) to 1.1m (1200% annual average family income).

"Go somewhere else" - They did that - and Halifax housing prices tripled in 3 years, from 310% annual average family income to 840% annual average family income.

We need to build more houses or have fewer people, but instead we're slowing down on building and importing new people as fast as we can
It’s not that. Someone willing and able to become such CEO will do it and keep doing it regardless.
Telegram is also bad
Oh so now the millions in Canada all they need to do is to work in big tech. I see. Problem solved. Thanks for enlightening me. I am so glad I left that messed up country filled with “we made it our own and you can too” people.

Just to give you context, median software Engineer salary in Canada is 95200. An average townhome in any of the cities now is over 600k easily, forget about Toronto and Vancouver where most likely those tech jobs are. Mortgage for a place like this in the current rate is easily around 2500-3000. Add in car, insurance, electricity, cost of daycare. And then see how much of after tax income can you afford to bring home.
There is no one true way that bank accounts work. I work for a big bank and I've come to accept that there are valid cases for UPDATING and even DELETING transactions in your Core Banking system. It is true that your general ledger is append-only, but that doesn't apply to what happens before you close your books.