skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't. You leave. The die is cast, and the decision has been made. The bozo bit has been set. Those in charge want you gone, likely for some personal vendetta. So what? You fell in with the wrong people. Do not waste another minute of your precious life worrying about this situation.

As a wise taxi driver once said to me "It's not your Daddy's company." Fuck them. Do you really think that people are going to say "There's Stan. He was on a PiP, but now he's straightened out and flying right." Of course they aren't -- these are the narcissistic bullying types which put you in this position in the first place. Nobody likes drama, except these louses of people who foist it on innocent, well-meaning types like you. Engaging with this drama will drain your self-esteem. They have already got you in such a spin you are asking randoms on this site for help. Disengage quietly, and don't feed the beast.

A PiP is a tool used so that they can fire you "with cause" to reduce their liability.

Good luck, and remember: fuck 'em.
I admire them for not going shitty electron app path. I don't think it's suitable for serious programming. But it has it's uses like working on a folder with a lot of config files, scripts, etc. Making some casual changes on large projects are perfectly fine too. Nonetheless, I love Geany. Kudos to the Geany team!
Great success. Killed by the industry. It is very hard to find the album from this band - Loituma.
Great music, highly recommended.
You are right, but I wouldn't emphasize this in the proof, for the following reasons:

1. Since you assume a contradictory statement, you can actually derive everything you want. So saying "it's true in that context" is pretty meaningless.

2. I think it adds an unnecessary step in the proof. "This new number is not divisible by any prime, therefore it is prime, contradiction as it is not in the list" compared to "It is not divisible by any prime, contradiction since any number is divisible by a prime". I think that is confusing.

3. For didactical reasons. It can leave the reader/student with the wrong impression that multiplying the first n primes and adding one always creates a new prime.
Fear and loathing on the merger trail (1998)
You mean the where exists/not exists concept? Or the select 1 usage in that correlated subquery?
I stopped using my a year or so ago. The cost just seemed ridiculous compared to competitors.

I was a pretty happy user for a few years but I couldn’t justify it anymore.
Unpopular opinion: Trying to shoehorn all of Unicode into domain names was a bad idea. We should have stuck with case-insensitive ASCII [A-Za-z0-9-].
It tests whether you can write a simple loop with a couple of ifs - not being able to do it is definitely an indicator that you won't be able to complete more advanced programming tasks. And pretty much any other programming task is more advanced.
The same way they are intercepting the jabber port they can intercept any other port for the HTTP ACME challenge. No need to get involved at the name server level.
This story reminds me of when I was a teenager and delivered a weekly free newspaper to the neighbouring houses. The newspaper company would call up a few houses to check if they'd received the paper. Except they never connected the employee database and the "mystery shopper" database, so would call our house phone every few months and ask if we'd received the newspaper. It was always a source of amusement for us!
OP asked why nobody has beaten TM. The answer cannot be "because they have a vertically integrated monopoly" because in the past that wasn't true and nobody was able to beat them then either.
> The difference between "something went wrong", "we're looking into it", "we've found the problem and are working on a fix", and "we have a fix and are deploying it region-by-region" is huge.

It's also a figment of your imagination.

No service provider provides those fine-granular updates. Even AWS shows their services as up when they are clearly major outages going.

The only reliable services tracking outages are third-party canary services that rely on crowdsourced reports, and obviously those don't come even close to providing any insight onto progress.

I think you're confusing your own wishful thinking with real-world implementations of status reporting services.
Cute, I found a similar issue in OpenBSD's tar as mentioned, I didn't share the exploit before but basically a long filename does it.

Something like: https://gist.github.com/dgl/355840320535bf8ef8b70f2e0722bf65

(I reported this one to OpenBSD but they didn't fix it. Much like Busybox, which has been known for years.)
They did an experiment: ask for a poor person and you get a black person. Then they tried to buck the stereotype: ask for a white poor person, and often you still get a black person.

This was my experience too with NightCafé models. Once I wanted to refine a model to do a detail differently, but even with exaggerated weighting I was not successful.

The models are fed with stereotypes, so they don't know to spit out something not a stereotype.
Why do you need new buildings? This article is literally about the value of a building declining.

The problem is that there are large numbers of dwellings that are empty, but the property owners don't want to rent them out in the vague hope that in the future they'll be able to charge much more.

So you get high rents and homelessness (that's your fentanylpocalypse that you've decided is the city's fault and not the predictable consequence of cost driven homelessness) while also having large numbers of unoccupied apartments. All because a bunch of investors are hoping that by restricting the supply they can push rent prices up.
So where’s Lina Kahn pressuring to break up these exclusive agreements? She made hay talking about them in 2022 but what has been done recently? https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/big-firms-lik...
I honestly just don't see it. I can not see anyway which anything is becoming better by this immature and ridiculous regulation.

What it certainly does is put burdens on small companies, independent developers and open source projects. For no benefit whatsoever. And this is just the start.
At first I was excited about hearing this, but there’s two big caveats to this:

1) Due to some odd wording in the terms of what’s permissible, your stream can’t be lower quality than what you send to other platforms. Because YouTube offers a higher ingestion bandwidth rate (10+ Mbps) than Twitch (6 Mbps), someone appealing to both services that wants to send the maximum bitrate allowed for quality purposes or even with differing resolutions can be hit due to the technicality:

> otherwise degrading, the video quality on Twitch so that it’s worse than on other platforms would make the user’s experience on Twitch less than other services and, therefore, not meet these guidelines.

2) A popular tool for streamers who aren’t bound by exclusivity (anyone not Affiliate/Partner before this came out) used Restream to both stream to multiple platforms as well as integrate a combined chatroom, for example mixing YouTube and Twitch chats, will have to stop doing so. This sucks for viewer interactivity and would be a net negative to smaller streamers:

> You do not use third-party services that combine activity from other platforms or services on your Twitch stream during your Simulcast, such as merging chat or other features, to ensure the Twitch community is included in the entirety of the experience of your livestream.

So, this feels more like a bait and switch to generate positive PR when a lot of the conversation toward Twitch has been negative the past year, and less of an omission of no longer being the top dog of gaming streaming.

Source: https://help.twitch.tv/s/article/simulcasting-guidelines
Congratulations! I used to use it when only other open GUI IDE was Netbeans (or Eclipse).
It doesn’t anymore but Amazon made a play to get into games that didn’t work out. I’m not sure any of their first party studios even used Lumberyard.
Sounds like a job for a windowing function.
> EU legislation is not read by anyone when we're literally discussing the issues in one such legislation?

We are discussing a marginal part of the total EU regulation. A lot is slipping by, that most people in the EU are unaware of. Btw, I don't think this proposal is being mentioned in any mainstream news.
Regular domestic connections often block ports (especially email). In many countries, ISPs won't sell you a static IP (your dynamic address might not change ever, but you don't control rDNS records).

These kind of measures force people to move onto a rented server instead. Often ISPs rent servers themselves. The conflict of interest here is hard to ignore: if ISPs make it easy and convenient to host from home, their business of renting servers suffers.
Chinese ship becomes focus of inquiry into Baltic pipeline damage
What? What screwed thinking is that?

It's literally a policy from Okta to investigate issues, which isn't Cloudflare's fault. The tool from Okta got compromised and all clients that needed support from Okta could/have been damaged as well.

Additionally, it was Cloudflare that SAW something was off and notified Okta. Cloudflare didn't get breached at all.

> The root cause is that Okta got compromised.

It's even suprising that Cloudflare's policies are so good in detection that they detected this at all, before Okta.
If you don't like EXISTS, the other standard way to get a semijoin is using IN with a subquery. SELECT * FROM a WHERE x IN (SELECT y FROM b);
I've wrestled with StableDiffusion and it's very, very biased.

I wanted a photo of an average-looking older woman and it was unbelievably hard to get it to produce that. And even after some very detailed, emphatic prompts the results still weren't as good as generic stock photo - never mind someone you might see in the real world.

SD believes most women are in their 20s and have big boobs. It's comically obvious if you try to get any fantasy art out of it and you want something that isn't big-boobed porn.

It's a content problem, not a prompt problem. It's been modified since to make it less porn-y but it's still a very long way from supporting straightforward prompt access to the face and body space most humans live in.

So it's a fair criticism to say it's stereotyping. Most of what comes out of it is a white middle class male's idea of what [thing] looks like.

This is inevitable with small training sets. AI is basically data compression. But the lack of awareness that the output comes from a lumpy dumbed down version of the training space is worrying.

It's textbook worse-is-better - narrowing experience and possibility towards flawed mediocrity, with the firm implication no one should have higher expectations. Because that's as good as it gets, and it's fine.
Other entities that publish transparency reports and that have received NSLs have reported them in bucketed ranges. I forgot the exact granularity.

It does not appear that NSLs compel arbitrary actions or require the recipient to actively lie about having received one.
My company has just recently finished a half-year project to migrate to Okta, alas >:(
Renewables Everywhere: Electrolysis at Its Best
Is this a troll answer?

I don't see any specific example of what exactly is bad about it in this reply, so, the question remains open.

If the answer would be so obvious that the question must be a disingenuous troll question, then surely it must be effortless to give a meaningful answer. It's a terrible architecture because it...what? What obviously backwards and never can and never could possibly work idea does it try to implement?

Not even my question but I just found criticizing the question with this answer pretty rich.
> That is the difference. People in Gaza also have nowhere to go if they wanted.

Exactly, the difference isn't that in the Ukraine war that the Russians are being careful or precise, it's that the Ukrainian citizens can actually evacuate from the areas they are in.
Next time you try that trick, use heptane (sold commercially in North America as "Un-du") instead of isopropanol. Hot knife meets butter... and it evaporates cleanly and the sticker retains most of its stickiness!
> I think the large streamers are a loss leader for Twitch. Delivering thousands of extremely high resolution, high frame rate, high bit rate streams costs a fortune

It's the best use-case for webRTC-based delivery though. They could be saving ~90-95%[1] of their bandwidth cost on these use-cases, I find it very intriguing that they haven't adopted it after all that time.

[1] actual production number when I was working on that topic.
KKR will lose quite a bit of money on that property when they offload it, perhaps unless they can lobby the govt to do some kind of residential conversion.
I’ve done it a few times in the app I’m working with and had no idea DISTINCT was not the proper way to address it. I mean, it’s a standard feature, named « distinct », easy to use and it works. It’s on me that I didn’t run an explain on these queries, but it seems like an easy mistake to make.

Anyway I’ll happily fix these in my code on Monday.
Pressurise one side or depressurise another side. If it's truly stuck you have to hot tap the pipeline.
Reference counting prevents that from working well. Very little sharing actually happens by default.
> People looked at the USSR and knew this was bad idea and then they went on to do it again.

I assume the next step is you explaining how and in what respects the EU is like the USSR. Because for now it’s not really convincing. For example, how the current decision process could lead to something like the Holodomor. In which way is the European Parliament like the supreme Soviet. How the political systems works to reinforce the power of the biggest member over its satellites. How the EU could do something like the invasion of Afghanistan. How it could bleed itself dry with a pointless arms race. You know, the sort of reasons why the USSR actually collapsed.

> It was supposed to be a community to facilitate trade between countries.

Sigh. It never was. From the beginning it was a union to prevent war between members. You can read on the Schuman declaration (1950) or the treaties of Paris (1951) and Rome (1957), for a start.

> Instead they want to make it a new country with its own flag

It’s not a new country, and it’s not a country at all.

> its own parliament

The common assembly, which became the European Parliament was created with the treaty of Paris in 1951, it cannot have come as a surprise to any member who joined afterwards.

> it's own army

It does not have an army.

> it's own laws that supersede the laws of the member states.

Again, this has been the case since the very beginning, when it was an alliance of 6 countries. How is this any new? Where is the deception?

> The British knew it and that is why they left. This was not supposed to be the plan.

The British left over internal politics and the dysfunction of their main political parties. One side did use the arguments you mentioned. It was bullshit then, and it is stil bullshit now.

> However nowadays criticizing the EU is like asking 2020 where COVID came from, you shouldn't talk about it because otherwise you may be labelled as a conspiracy theorist or even worse a populist.

You can. We’re living in democracies and we can criticise anything we want. The kind of blatant dishonesty and bad faith in your arguments is why you get those labels.

Mainstream political parties criticise the EU all the time, both from left- and right-wing perspectives. If you’re from the UK, I am sorry but your problems come from your own government.
Isn't this mainly an issue of garbage in garbage out?

Most of the world's recorded images are not average or representative. People take and share images very selectively. As far as the model is concerned, what it produced probably is representative (representative of the training data).

On the other hand, if a generative model was trained exclusively on new and unfiltered images of a journey through the sights of a country - not a tourist's sights - but non-selective sights, a journey no human would bother taking. Not only would it have a fighting chance of generating something beyond a stereotype for the given prompts, but we might also learn something from it.
https://repost.aws/knowledge-center/support-case-browser-har...
Oh you7re right. I didn't read till the end.
> StableDiffusion is trained on scraping nearby text on the page

And that nearby text was written by humans, so it may not be explicitly labelled in HTML attributes but if the context wasn't related the scraping wouldn't work.
There's no good reason why you couldn't rewrite DISTINCT to GROUP BY, but remember that it wouldn't work in all cases; you could have both. E.g. SELECT DISTINCT COUNT(*) FROM t1 GROUP BY a;. Similarly, HAVING and window functions happen after GROUP BY but before DISTINCT, so a simple move won't always be correct and you'd have to account for that.
Reverse the flow and pump it backwards. As far as I know it's not too common of an occurrence though.
I feel like streamers are harder to get than viewers. Viewers just need to go to the site and watch a streamer, but a streamer needs to set it up to stream.

They could probably get viewers back fairly easy through advertising or tie ins to games, but doing that with streamers would likely be harder.
Nah, it's really important that we blame the SF governance (which has plenty of issues) for the poor planning and failure to accept basic capitalism of a for-profit condo company. Seriously this is basic capitalism: if your customers/tenants all work for one industry, and that industry craters and lays them all off, you aren't going to have customers/tenants any more - and the local government can't control that.

[Blaming SF's governance for literally everything as if it controls many of the companies based in SF collapsing because they were poorly run and/or poorly conceived failing and leaving is the only thing that passes muster in HN comments :D]
I don’t think it is all that subversive to use a route that the developer built for that purpose.
Well, to me, the best GUI for the text editor is as little of it as possible... But Emacs can be made to show a lot of buttons and drop-down menus. Very few people would use it like that though. Also, Emacs has decent mouse support, it's just not useful for editing text, so nobody is really using it.
Just to be clear (with better details already given by other comments), addressing this is specifically part of the threat model for Certificate Transparency. You could argue that CT policies should be strengthened in various ways, but the threat model does intend to address detecting the compelled misissuance scenario.
I push a boiled egg and an egg cup towards the candidate and ask them to eat it like x86 processor.

- If they put the egg in the cup the upside-down, its a fail

- If its right-side up with solid rationale, I know its a senior. Without rationale - I know its a lucky junior.

- If they immediately grab the egg and swallow it without saying a word they are destined for management

- If they take out a cap'n crunch whistle and blow on it while giving me a red card, I have to resign and let them take over the reigns
No, there are no wealth tax schemes beyond property tax. It takes very little time into the implementation of a general wealth tax to realize it involves breaking up successful companies, which kills it in its place.
Very interesting, I didn't know many people got > 100mpbs without paying for the infra. I am going off the fact that (as you may have seen in the news) a lot of ISPs got in trouble for advertising and selling 100mbps when a huge amount (majority?) of consumers could possibly pay for that without realising they'd never get it. After that made the news I noticed much more prominent caveats on 100mbps tiers, and many telcos dropped their top plan to 75mbps or even 50.

I didn't realise some places were genuinely getting 1Gbps. Amazing!
Similar post should be made on effects of screen time and how it effects sleep
> When is this argument going to die? Should all provinces in every country declare independence and take back control from the supra-provincial government? Should all cities in all provinces declare independence from the provincial governments too? Should every neighbourhood....?

If you are not aware, you should look up the Catalonian referendums and the Scottish National party. Also What about Kosovo? Because something exists does not mean it can not be dissolved or changed.

Bizarrely, when it comes to the EU, most people like you say, well it's there now what do you want to do about it? But the states in Europe were there as well before the CEE and before the EU, shouldn't the same rule apply then?

It is perfectly possible and acceptable for people to decide their fate. If a certain part of a country wants to be independent, why not grant them?

> You can keep going on about the "supra-national agencies" for as long as you want. At the end of the day your argument rests on the assumption that the nation state is the final form of sovereignty, and there's just no God-given reason for that to be the case.

I don't know about the god given reasons. But I do know that a nation is made of a history, a culture, a language, common values and a common identity.

You can't just wave a wand in the air and say to 500 million people, here you go, you are no longer French, German or Spanish, you are European. It's been tried in the past with arbitrary borders being drawn between India and Pakistan and as well in Africa. We can see the results of that now.

> Entities form political and economic alliances when it is beneficial to do so. There are costs associated with the benefits of course, and those must be evaluated. Your argument that it's inherently bad because "It's not a sovereign nation state any more", is just a rather weak, but infectious, talking point. I don't understand why people keep regurgitating it.

Absolutely but there is a difference between an alliance and a supra national authority that can impose rules and regulations to it's members. Then its not an alliance, that's being a vassal to another state/entity.

A sovereign state can decide it's fate and decide what is beneficial for itself and it's citizens. States can agree to implement laws based on pacts and treaties. That is not disputed.

If there is a supreme authority that can compel you to apply laws to your citizens without their explicit approval, then, the state becomes just a shell.

In essence this setup of the EU will lead the the formation of the "United states of Europe". That may be well and good for you but shouldn't the people be asked their opinions about it?
For a while, learning German, I kept misreading "Scheinwerfer" (light thrower, headlight) as "Schweinwerfer" (pig-thrower).
>I am not an expert in python but I feel that the JS model where everything is on the event loop and there is no actual threads seem better for a dynamic language

Python has become essentially the primary language for scientific computing and deep learning, and for this the JavaScript approach is absolutely inadequate. Real shared memory parallelism is needed to avoid the unnecessary copying that the subprocess approach entails.

>I don't know, this just feels better and simpler? If you really need to you can go down to a lower level language for full memory sharing data structures

A low level language is already used in Numpy, PyTorch etc., but that's not enough; the Python glue code becomes unnecessarily painful when using multiprocessing, pain that would go away with proper threads.
Indeed! The white man tripped and fell, and everyone laughed at his misfortune, then the white man ordered dinner for his family. The end.
Countries change names and area over time. England is said to have been founded in the year 927 and obviously the roman, persian and egyptian empires vastly preceded that. There have been countries for many, many 1000s of years.

The list you show there is the latest incarnation of most countries. In almost all cases, something similar preceded it.