skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Cool totally academic exercise. I shudder at the performance not to mention energy waste.

A better question is what chain to use for efficient ( $/op or watts/op? ) verified Turing complete computation.

Avax?? I really have no idea.
What does your app do? I don't get it. (Read the website and still don't get it)
Because it's a different business? No one needs to run anything. Bandcamp offers an easy way for musicians to have a fairly customizable online presence with a flexible pricing model, a merch store, and, importantly, plug into a larger platform's discoverability mechanism.
You might want to read up on that.

Socialism is an incredibly broad term in practice, a typical sound bite dictionary definition hints at this:

a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

So .. community as a whole, not just workers, and not even ownership is required, regulated for the general benefit (minimising polution, requiring power operators to deliver in 99.9% of weather conditions with a fixed cost ceiling) of the commons counts.
> Resursive summarization (Wu et al., 2021b) is a simple way to address overflowing context windows, however, recursive summarization is inherently lossy and eventually leads to large holes in the memory of the system.

Yes, it does.

> In our experiments ... conversational context is read-only with a special eviction policy (if the queue reaches a certain size, a portion of the front is truncated or compressed via recursive summarization), and working context is writeable by the LLM processor via function calls.

You're doing the same thing, and you have the same problems.

You're just doing it slightly differently; in this case instead of recursively summarizing everything, you're selectively searching the history and generating it for each request. Cool idea.

...but, I'm skeptical; this fundamentally relies on the assumption that the existing context consists of low entropy summarizable context, and that any query relies only on a subset of the history.

This might be true for, eg. chat, or 'answer question about some document in this massive set of documents'.

...but, both of these assumptions are false in some contexts; for example, generating code, where the context is densely packed with information which is not discardable (eg. specific api definitions), and a wide context is required (ie. many api definitions).

It is interesting how this is structured and done, and hey, the demo is cool.

I'm annoyed to see these papers about summary things fail to acknowledge the fundamental limitations of the approach.
You seem to have missed what I said. I didn't say nobody gets money 25 years down the line, I said people don't write because of the profits they might get 25 years down the line.

Yes, Netflix might've been able to make The Witcher without paying him, and also random Youtubers, complete nobodies, would've been able to make derivative works as well. That's the whole point of expiring copyright.

Does that favor big corporations? Well, it also means anybody and everybody can make Mickey Mouse content, or use the popular Marvel and DC characters, etc. Do you think Disney is a fan of that idea?

So while corporations would take advantage of it, so would random people, including indie artists.
If the main attack vector is "software preinstalled by shady manufacturers", I'd still file that under "nothingburger". There are many, many ways for shady manufacturers to do shady things with their OEM version of Android, and this is far from a game changer for them.
The second sentence of the abstract says, "Rather than executing computations on Bitcoin, they are merely verified..."
Oh I misunderstood, sorry about that.

We went from Server -> Cloud -> GTFO. Server also had tiered pricing starting at $10 for 3 users. It went up from there in much saner increments but I don’t recall them.

We exited the ecosystem at the last cloud price hike. Their product pricing people are delusional.
Well, in the old days, you just put the splats in your 3d space, they weren't really sprites (in the strict sense that they didn't use dedicated sprite hardware). They're really interesting thing is that they're being used here to render the learned representation, but there's nothing particularly special about them or new or AI/ML about them.

You could "model" 3d objects with the gaussians by just putting a bunch together. It was a way to produce fast rendering 3d images without using a bunch of polygons. The results back then were...left behind by other techniques.

There's a massive back catalog of computer graphics work on the technique, it's usually just easiest to use the search tools and search back for all dates leading up to say...2021 and you'll find tons of normal old stuff like CS 302 - Computer Graphics courseware slides or whatever on the technique.

https://www.google.com/search?q=gaussian+splat+-site%3Apinte...
https://apnews.com/article/el-salvador-nayib-bukele-gangs-60...

How does this relate? There they actually enforced the laws and threw violators in prison. A similar strategy could be employed with drug dealers, property crime, etc in SF
i think he meant technical artists
I mean if it's just single letter to phoneme then I can understand, most vowels are pronounced differently depending on if they are stressed or not, there is quite a long lists of vowels that use two letters and then there are some consonants that change sound in the presence of other consonants. And then there's the ij, which despite what other languages think is really just one letter.
Oh, yes. I didn’t mean to imply they were mutually exclusive. Just that the one spoke to me more than the other :)
it's all personal preference, but "head and shoulders" is excessive.

I prefer the directing in Stand Alone Complex. the 95 movie moves slower, and glosses over a ton of complexity because movies have less time to work with than shows.

but it's kind of the same directing in either case, because the 1995 movie's director, Mamoru Oshii, worked on Stand Alone Complex as well.

the 95 movie does have some advantages in the consistency of its production values, because TV shows have to churn out a lot more content. but this fight scene is imo better than anything in the movie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZb-43E6clQ

also, again, it's a franchise. Stand Alone Complex is not the TV series, it's one of the series.
Have you used Bandcamp? It's a way larger feature set than an iOS app for picture sharing.
The problem is, they will enforce the scanning in the usual mainstream apps like WhatsApp and telegram. They will have killed privacy for everyone using those.

But this won't be the end of it. Obviously the pervs will simply move to an open source app that doesn't obey this scanning. Or they'll use some kind of overlay encryption. Like sending gpg encrypted files as you point out.

So, in a year or so the police will rightfully complain they can't filter those and there's too many apps to check for. So what will the EU do? They'll mandate client side scanning in the OS that scans everything being displayed on screen. It's the only way to catch everything. They just killed privacy for everyone using an off the shelf phone. And perhaps PC if they include those.

But this won't be the end of it. Obviously the pervs will simply move to an open source OS.

So, in a year after that the police will complain they can't check open source devices. So what will they do? They'll mandate running a signed OS and using attestation to access the internet. They just killed FOSS and privacy for everyone using technology.

And of course, no that won't be the end of it. The pervs will share their pics on paper or whatever. And everyone else will be under surveillance for the rest of our lives.

This endeavour will only lead to erosion of privacy and will not lead to prevention of sharing this material because they'll just find another way.

Whatever the EU will come up with, it'll either easily be bypassed, or it'll be unthinkably draconian. The former won't solve the problem and the latter will end society as we know it. There is no solution other than hard police work.
That's reasonable enough. But ALCHEMY is not a verb.
I don't think anyone ever uses a CSS reset on its own, the point is to reset and then put your own style on.

Browser default styles aren't really good enough to be usable IMO; yes they have paragraphs but with zero margin and tiny text they're not exactly readable. Twitter Bootstrap is pretty much a bug report against the browser default style. Given that current browser default styles are half-assed at best, I'm sympathetic to the idea that not having a default browser style at all would be better.
Because they were publicly listed with public financials, you know they were not losing money:

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/profit...

You also know from using Amazon that they were near flawlessly executing 2 day shipping across the US with prices competitive with Walmart and other successful retailers.

They also had a pricing advantage against incumbents due to not having to collect sales tax in all states until 2016.

It’s mostly the verifiably not losing money part though so you knew they weren’t overextending, and they were delivering what people wanted.
Wow, Point and Speak looks amazing. Despite all their faults, Apple really deserves credit for bringing great accessibility stuff like this to millions of consumers.

>Detection Mode in Magnifier and Point and Speak

>In the Magnifier app, Point and Speak helps users interact with physical objects that have several text labels. For example, while using a household appliance, Point and Speak combines input from the Camera app, the LiDAR Scanner, and on-device machine learning to announce the text on buttons as users move their finger across the keypad.

>Point and Speak is built into the Magnifier app on iPhone and iPad , works with VoiceOver, and can be used with other Magnifier features such as People Detection, Door Detection, and Image Descriptions to help users navigate their physical environment more effectively.
Registering handlers is a startup activity ... Practically the only time I allow a panic in my code. I also have unit tests for the entire startup sequence so theoretically code with ambiguous handlers would never be committed.
My mistake, thanks
This NYC Building Is in the Bird-Killing Hall of Shame. It Wants Out
I agree. SaaS isn’t a loophole, it’s one of the legitimate things you can do with software freedom, in letter and in spirit.

Software is not services, and attempting to conflate them is, at the very least, logically flawed.
Perhaps it’s easier in psychology than in political science, for some reason?

Eh, psychology is sort of a soft science. It's actually pretty tough to find rigorous studies, firm conclusions, deeply informed analyses, etc.

The successful example cited is about gender bias. Gender bias is a difficult topic to sort out. It seems to lend itself to biased conclusions where two people seeing the same thing project a lot onto it and draw different conclusions with little hope of convincing the opposing view.

It thus seems malleable in some sense.
> Writing books can be a pretty risky proposition from a financial point of view. Copyright should at least span an authors lifetime in my opinion.

Why is it accepted that patents can last only 20 years then? Like, do you think creating new inventions is easy? Why for one and not the other?

But the bigger thing is that books making significant amounts of money after twenty years is an extreme exception. That's not the motivating thing. It's a "maybe that'd be nice" on top of the desire for revenue in the immediate future, in the first few years of the book coming out.
Does it? If you were omniscient and knew definitively that you were goodness itself, wouldn’t it be loving to share yourself with others?
Much higher-level, but I keep coming back to it (especially the direct links to the various USB specifications, although slightly outdated): https://fabiensanglard.net/usbcheat/
Wow, love this explanation. The IEX bit also nails it perfectly based on my experience.
Sure. I'm not advising anyone do this of course. I feel like heavy rains are a solvable problem for EVs, its probably an easier problem for them to solve compared to ICE. I shared the story to show how sometimes vehicles need to exceed their design parameters, could've easily been people in danger there instead of animals.
Not a good look for Teams in this interview.

"So, as we struggle to resolve our IT issues, it’s a little stressful, but I’m also struggling to suppress a laugh. Eventually, Herzog decides it’s a problem with the Teams video-call platform we are using: he delivers this information like he’s been prophesising this disaster for years but no one’s heeded him. “I’ve had it a dozen times before, it’s very, very frustrating,” he says. “And I keep predicting that if we do not do Zoom, we will lose the conversation. I hang up now.

Five minutes later – turns out he’s right! – we catch up again on the Herzog-endorsed Zoom."
The question is about marketing. How do you market on Telegram?
Drawing over other apps is a problem too. On my OnePlus, I just checked, there are 23 apps with the permission to draw over other apps, but only 3 of those are the ones I've explicitly allowed.

20/23 apps are Google, OnePlus, or Android System apps. I never knew so many of them had this permission!
They often do, embedded in the PNG as metadata.

Otherwise its just inconvenient. Its easier to share without the prompt.

Also prompting is trickier with model like SDXL that have seperate content and style prompting. Users often dont even know the full prompt.
Ideally.

But that's impractical, so the next soonest time is at startup.
If it's important enough they will do it

Notably, this also requires that you are important enough. To some people, like the hypothetical client, you are not.
"probably" is key Here. this introduces the possibility of typo erros that can even be discovered late.
Now you will need a Vet check to make sure that GET, POST etc are written correctly instead of letting the compiler to do it's job. .Get(), Post() get compiler guarantees that they are sending the right Method string.
There are other alternatives than use a herbicide that kills a certain number of people. The thing is that massive multi-billion dollar companies absolutely try to sabotage any consideration of the safety of their pesticides, because it's so much money to them. If you are a researcher, you'll be getting into a fraught area if you are doing a study to validate it's safety. It's similar to looking into climate science - the crazies will come for you, and probably the pseudo-non-climate-scientist people taking money from exxon.
None of which is especially relevant to the rug pull business, except in the sense that investors have seen the rug pull work and they are seeing that wild ride of the SV VCs is coming to an end, either through regulation or collapse, so they are doing it sooner.
There are no perfect free markets. But the closer you can get to them, the more beneficial they are.

Protectionism hurts yourself just like trade sanctions and embargoes hurt the other guy.
Using different flours for sourdough fosters different bacteria–and flavors
[dupe]

Lots of discussion earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37901059
I do pay for some more permissive open source projects that I use, even ones I contribute back to, yes.

I completely understand organizations banning AGPL software. Having an employee mistakenly violate the license is just too great a risk. The majority of AGPL projects seem to be offering the same product on a different commercial license, which is the only way I'd use an AGPL project. E.g. paying for a non-APGL license to use it without the risk.
Why do you think it's a good thing for companies to run at maximum efficiency? Have some slack, spread the knowledge around, let people go on vacation, have a bench, have replacements. Have a world that's more than capital owners and slaves.
Real, living breathing DJs. They are a way better way to discover new music.

Listen to a set and pull out Shazam whenever you hear something you like. It can even dump all that into a spotify playlist

For me its the only way to fly
Ah, salary cap, forgot about those.
cars designed to drive 100s of thousands of miles aren't susceptible to random splashes even if the battery is low.

I think the most likely explanation here is that the battery compartment was damaged in a way that allows water intrusion, and then they drove in extremely wet weather which splashed into the compartment.
Discover Weekly specifically requires artists to "pitch" their songs to Spotify. If you're already following the artist, their new releases that have been pitched are supposedly guaranteed to show up on your Discover Weekly. Otherwise, I believe it's someone at Spotify who picked that song which then distributes it to "relevant" listeners.
Big fan of Quastor and ByteByteGo.

Some other resources I've found really helpful, especially as I've moved towards a backend/systems-heavy role at my job.

- roadmap.sh has a lot of resources that may help you figure out where gaps in your backend knowledge are.

- TLDR Web Dev is an useful daily resource for the latest articles and trends in software engineering.

- engineerscodex.com writes great articles about real-world software engineering, such as how Instagram scaled so much with a small team.
The sad thing is if that guy was doing a presentation, there'd be middle managers and C-Level people nodding while being inspired...
Instagram was an outlier, and I think you know that.
A High-Level Overview of Large Language Model Concepts, Use Cases, and Tools
You are very confidently making some wild statements that seem to be based on the assumption that only because something isn't specified in a given place, it couldn't be specified somewhere else. That assumption is wrong.
> I would find it a bit odd if I was hiring someone who works with AWS already and doesn't have this

Is it? I work with AWS every day, and I feel like getting the certificate will add absolutely nothing to my expertise, so it’s just wasted money.
This reasoning is a good live-demo of how politics has wormed its way into the current crop of judges due to the fact that this is a more than valid textualist argument that has been applied in other cases but you'll never see it actually argued by one for 2A. It really ought to be the progressive judges who make the case for 2A being expanded wider than the founder's could reasonably intend but they also won't argue it.

So we end up in this weird land because originalism and conservatism usually agree and so too progressivism and liberalism to the point where the lines of thought shape how more than the courts think of issues. But both sides end up having to do tricky mental gymnastics on this particular issue to resolve the two. But this is, of course, silly. It appeals only to the lizard brain who when faced with decisions far beyond the ability for humans to understand or are effectively arbitrary need a made up framework on which to post-hoc justify what are really just gut feelings.

When the answer to what path better is more obvious like "should people be allowed to buy a bazooka at Walmart" nobody is out here asking if the founders would have intended it, everyone just goes, "oh fuck no" and we move on.
On the other hand

https://chat.openai.com/share/8a0675b6-2876-4606-ac79-646391...
Can you give one example? I keep reading the negative comments about SO, how the moderators are bad, and there's never one example confirming it.
> who the heck knows what is even real. We're here now, whatever this is. YOLO.

I don't disagree, but in this essay PKD seems to say that there is no objective reality, rather everybody has their own experiential reality that is at most somewhat connected to others' experiential realities.

This is a far cry from saying, as I believe, that there is an objective reality and we each experience it subjectively and with whatever fidelity to the underlying reality we're capable of.

The former view seems a lot more hopeless / nihilistic -- what's the point of striving for anything if it mostly only affects our own reality?
Thought this was what retrospective meetings were for
It's a SaaS. That's a 10 person team at maximum efficiency. They could be a lifestyle business with 30. They've still got 50% more headcount to reduce.
Water over the wheel hubs is a big deal. If you read your owner's manual submerged hubs requires re-lubing, at the very least. If you submerge a diff or crankcase those have to be drained and redone as well.
> JetBrains software

I think this falls into the "we know what you meant," but that's not systemically true of JetBrains; quite a bit of their stuff is Apache 2: https://github.com/orgs/JetBrains/repositories

They have done some underhanded shit with some of the plugins but via acqui-hires, not rug-pull-ing their repos from an open license, so I wouldn't lump them into the same category as closed source software, nor the vile behavior of Hashicorp, Sentry, or Sourcegraph
Yes I used it, it looks like a website from 2004, clearly their core competencies can not be about building their own file upload, payment etc. but creating Customer Friendly Sexy
Branded landing, working with labels etc. which they failed to do with 100 ppl
I mean, the big difference is I have used bandcamp and it took me about 5 seconds to figure out how it worked… I read all your info pages and I have no idea what Kuky is. The stock images with all the latin words make it seem like it is just a scam.
Model-View-Patroller
[dupe]

Read the site more: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37901930
> Tech is an interest-rate-sensitive industry.

why? funding?
ASP.NET Core can easily route "/hello" to HelloController.Index(), but it's not exactly automatic. The controller library adds routes to the routing middleware in a call to MapControllerRoute the app developer must make during startup which specifies a pattern.

app.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/mvc/controller...

If you don't call one of the MapController methods, requests will not be routed to controllers even if they exist in the same project.
I used the Intel Software Development Emulator (SDE) about a decade ago. It lets you develop and test software on a CPU that doesn't have the necessary vector extensions (AVX, etc.). I presume it uses the SIGILL trapping technique. In practice, I found it to be about 1000× slower than native - but that's why it's intended to be a development tool. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/t...
practically, mats can be much thicker
This comment is interesting to me, because in Clojure there is a data-driven routing library called Reitit, and by default it will refuse to compile conflicting routes unless you explicitly tag the conflicting routes as conflicting. So Golang's new behavior is more intuitive to me than the current behavior.

I have also ran into situations where I needed a routing tree like

[["/foo/bar"]
["/foo/:id"]]

but it's better IMO for routing libraries to force the user to acknowledge they are introducing conflicting routes rather than silently resolve conflicts. That way the user is forced to understand the behavior of the router.