skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While you can get 24TB ram, there is a pretty big cost difference. 2 TB of ram costs roughly $10000 compared to $130 for NVME storage (or $230 for 12 TB of a good hard drive). Sure the NVME is ~3.5x more expensive, but the latency will be dramatically lower and the throughput will be dramatically higher. Sure you can build a 24 TB ram system, but at that point the cost of the server will be entirely the ram. The reason for NVME based storage at this point is that at only ~3.5x the cost of a hard drive, you can switch all your storage over and as long as you don't need tons of storage (i.e. less than 100TB), the SSDs will be a minority of the cost of the system.
If you care then just do something. I've said enough. It's cost me enough.
That sort of sounds like the solution I was thinking of when reading this.. that handlers should only cache the signal received to be handled at the program's convenience, except for a kill signal etc.
YAML5: https://github.com/quasilyte/yaml5

YAML-LD w/ convenience.jsonld or dollar-convenience.jsonld: https://json-ld.github.io/yaml-ld/spec/
I too listen to albums in their entirety and don’t interact too much with autogenerated content.

But I was on Apple Music and now I’m on Spotify. The amount of new albums I get to listen to would put a massive dent in my bank account if I was buying them as I go.

I still purchase Vinyl and the odd CD, but that is reserved for my top must have records. A flat rate for music just makes sense to me, and allows me to check out and discover so many more new artists than in the old days, where my music taste was much narrower and confined to more mainstream “classic” rock and the like.
Any time I download music from Bandcamp, I drag it into Apple Music on my Mac and it syncs to all of my devices, sitting in my library like any other album.

It’s actually one of the reasons I use Apple Music over Spotify, the process to do this in Spotify is much more convoluted.
[dupe]

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37887570
Some aspects are so nice it's quite likely it can stay disfunctional forever and still not shrink significantly.
> There are other alternatives than use a herbicide that kills a certain number of people.

Like what? What impact would that have on food prices? Glyphosate costs $10 / acre, or maybe 15 cents per bushel of wheat.
So the take away here is to either use a VPN when searching, or use a less well known search engine.

Would he have been caught if he'd just Bing'd the address 14 times?
How do you see the secure messages though? They need to go through the graphics stack, some portion thereof at least.
I gotta admit, I'm really impressed by Marc's ability to completely subvert so many historical facts and figures to "support" his self-contradictory line of thought. This is just on a whole other level - even Trump would be jealous.

The e/acc crowd is just _completely_ insane, at this point. I'd laugh hard if not for the fact that people like Marc have economic power over the rest of us.
Well yeah, the point is there is no other textual online discussion board I’m aware of (fan out or otherwise) that pays people for the engagement from posting words to social media.
Politics tends to be too zero sum for this to work. In science the backers of a discredited theory don't really lose anything, but in politics they do. e.g. any policy that lowers the price of housing will benefit people who don't own property and hurt people who do.
Voice Chat with Mistral 7B
XTTS + Whisper + Mistral 7B
I've been through all the ups and downs around Ubuntu and gnome, but at least those changes generally happen at a time of my choosing too. I don't go to a commonly used app one day to do something quick only to find the entire UI was updated overnight.

Of course even the cli world has had it's changes though, systemd alone made decades of documentation obsolete.
I don't think anyone would really draw a distinction between these two cases as it applies to 3d printers. If the argument is that a tool is now on the market that made what used to be a high-effort activity into a low-effort one where you can now with some YT videos make less traceable guns then honestly, it kinda sucks in a ruining it for the class kinda way, but it actually seems somewhat reasonable to regulate them like firearms. If only so that the police know what doors to knock on if such a gun turns up.
How does it go against the HTTP Spec.
The HEAD method could be autoregistered for all handlers of GET Requests and library makes sure no body is sent (Basically it's a autoregistered middleware that wraps the get handler and overwrites the reponse writer with an empty body.)

Arguably this is more correct that letting the users declare a separate Handler that can neither guarantee the same headers as the the GET Handler not guarantee that the body is not sent the response.
https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/27/google_web_environmen...
If you want to be pedantic, the paper made the leap it did because of differentiable rendering which necessarily needs a differentiable representation of primitives - so they use Gaussians. It’s entirely novel and set in a nascent field (neural rendering). Gaussians happen to be further representable as easily rasterized primitives. Though some considerable work was put into making this performant. Everyone who keeps saying this has been around since the 90s is missing the context of the very modern differentiable rendering literature.
Chia uses a lisp variant, along with the a similar coin model to bitcoins utxo. So it's computationally powerful, while avoiding the security nightmares of Eths account model (i.e. no global variables, functions have no side effects)
I used to put my daughter to sleep by putting on "How It's Made" videos.
100 person companies are really small. Some local car dealerships have 100 employees. I think these layoffs are more about redundancy at the buyer than the people not being useful at Bandcamp probably.
Show HN: Proposed Cryptocurrency Aims at Environment and Social Justice
Here is a proposal for a new cryptocurrency that will be good for the environment and also reduce wealth inequality.
I would agree on that but compare weighting on college. Presumably not all kids make it to college but annual childcare costs in any licensed facility costs as much as college tuition so it still seems low.

Also though you may not notice it but your taxes are probably going up every year to cover additional public child care costs even if you aren’t paying directly.

Medical is probably one of the biggest mismatch categories though
> Isn't this a symptom of the selectors not being specific enough?

Well, yeah, but that's a "you're holding it wrong" argument. If you make your selectors specific enough then they will apply to the right elements, and if they applied to the wrong elements, well, they weren't specific enough. In practice people resort to only ever using a classname as a selector because anything else is too likely to break; there's no way to find out which selectors apply to which elements or which elements are covered by which selectors (e.g. you can't do the equivalent of "find references" on a variable).

> Can you give concrete examples of this happening?

Only on the level of, like, "my company's whole webapp" (but I've seen it cause real bugs in prod if that's what you're getting at). Getting surprised by which selectors get applied isn't a problem you can show in small examples, because it doesn't happen with small examples; it's only when the selectors and DOMs are too complex to keep in your head that you have a problem.

> That sort of thing feels like a perfect fit for CSS selectors to me.

Why does it need selectors though? It doesn't change based things at higher level (which is the failed ideology that the likes of the CSS Zen Garden were pushing - the idea that you want your component's styling to magically change to fit in with the page it's on or what's happening around it). What are you doing here that you couldn't do with a self-contained component that knew how to style itself?
It’s anyone who gets meaningful verified account impressions. There are probably tens of thousands of such accounts.
What does adapting mean to you? Surviving? Yes. Thriving? Epidemics of loneliness, mental health declines in young people exposed to technology and social media since birth and online echo chambers allowing violent conspiracy theorists to hype each other up to commit crimes. Doesn't seem like thriving to me.

And you didn't respond to my point about being as effective. This is all relative to baseline in office working.
Darwinian evolution of non-living systems?
So is using sed to play chess. This exists as a proof on concept not as a suggestion that it is a practical solution.

Since you chose to post this request here and not on the thread about playing chess with sed, I suspect you are imagining some form of real world effect from the energy expenditure from people doing this. I think that lacks a sense of perspective, a better approach would be to consider the change in state of the world after an extended period of expected use of the approach. Considering the considerable lack of practicality of calculating in Bitcoin (and indeed playing chess in SED) the expected use is negligible and consequently the impact would also be negligible.
LOL

always a sham
The philosophy goes back to him by Deleuze and Guattari via Nick Land, though most lump Marx's thought with the sins of the 20th century.
Brilliant read.

“ And secondly, what is not really much in the debate is that there seems to be evidence that we will disappear as a species. Probably fairly soon. And we should look into that as well.”

Can someone look into this please?
“basically”

I swear, whenever Musk comes up, brains go dark
So here's how it looks from the other side:

A 'high' (just not a new one) reputation user (not necessarily a moderator) opens a review queue. He sees a new question. He searches the SO if a similar question has been asked. He finds a similar question, and without reading and testing it thoroughly, he marks yours as a duplicate of that.

Now, you couldn't be bothered writing a comment about how the the duplicate flag is wrong, but another user who already spent some time cleaning up the site is supposed to thoroughly analyze both questions to begin with?

People on Stack Exchange tend to try to not be emotional like you, so they don't fight a battle with you. You just resign from a discussion, and then complain how a mistake has been made, that you didn't care to even point out.
[dupe]

More discussion over here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37897798
I'm pretty sure that these companies always try to give you at least one notification a day, so that you never log on to see nothing new.

Agreed that it's user-hostile, but it's presumably effective as a retention tactic.
The safety data is clear, that mix is more toxic to humans. Vinegar works in high concentrations that are hard to buy because of how toxic it is. Dish soap generally doesn't biodegrade, so it builds up. Salting the earth is something you do to enemies when you want to starve them out and ensure their land is never useful again.
You're missing the point - the time spent commuting is the real time-value lost here.
I was following some very very very inside the beltway political shit, so its not wrong in this case.

You could drill down into a bunch of specific areas and have a similar effect all over, but trying to do that in too many places leads to a drinking the firehose feeling.
Probably the older email address is still the primary one for the GitHub account.

GitHub took it upon themselves to change email addresses and author names when merging via the UI buttons like "Squash and Merge" in 2018 and then again in 2019. See <https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/1368> for the tedious details.

Essentially the post-2019 behaviour seems to be that where possible with "Squash and Merge" they will set noreply@github as the committer so that they can sign the merged commit themselves, and set author name & email to what they have recorded for the GH account involved (and the signature is then a record that GH have verified that account's involvement).

Personally I think it is shocking that they ignore the name and email address that the actual author of the commit has selected. This is both a violation of the author's intentions -- for example, you may set work and personal email addresses in different repositories as discussed here, but GitHub will rewrite them all to the same thing when other people press "Squash and Merge" on your pull requests -- and potentially a doxxing security risk.

I have considered re-reporting this to GitHub via the newer community discussions or via support again, but given the extent to which they've ignored all such reports over the last five years it is hard to find the motivation to do so.
Bitcon can be turing complete but it is not on purpose.
NASA's Webb captures an ethereal view of NGC 346
I‘m disappointed to see no mention of Tibetan orthography, which was formalised approximately 1000 years ago and has not changed since then — despite Old Tibetan having split into around 50 different Tibetic languages during that time. This results in, for instance, the current Dalai Lama’s name being written བསྟན་འཛིན་རྒྱ་མཚོ bsTan-'dzin rgya-mtsho despite being pronounced Tenzin Gyatso, or the city of Shigatse being written གཞིས་ཀ་རྩེ Gzhis-ka-rtse. The effect is rather like writing French as if it were Latin.
If I had to rank those features, I'd put build quality way ahead of acceleration

The most critical one is the actual charging experience. Tesla is literally in a league of its own, until the NACS switchover gets implemented by the various other manufacturers who have agreed to.

The second most critical one is Autopilot/FSD. Even in Beta, FSD is a life-changer / game-changer! Seriously, road trips have gone to basically zero stress and fatigue. Arguments with my wife about driving have also become a thing of the past.

Then third, would be the over the air updates. The car poses basically Zero maintenance burden on me, but continually gets better over time.

There’s a distorted view of people who don’t own an EV. The reality is different, and it’s one that most people don’t want to go back from, ever!
My point (and I think the points of others responding to you) is that parallel programming is not always hard. That's also what the author is saying.

The common myth - you're doing parallel programming? That sounds hard

It's not always hard. It really isn't! You don't need to be a genius or an expert to write parallel code.

Maybe where we're getting caught up is Cassie K's comment on ml engineering. You don't need to know how to build a microwave to use a microwave. In the same way, you don't need to be a genius or some deep expert in distributed systems to use abstractions that parallelize your programs

To write a parallel program does not require that you know what a mutex is. It just needs you to understand some simple algebraic (6-8th grade) properties about your functions (and, in fact, for library functions, they can be annotated as associative)

There is a broad spectrum of parallel programs. Somebody using a web server implementation? They've made a parallel application

Somebody running tensorflow or pytorch? Also parallel! Even for simple stuff!

You could be a beginner programmer and be taught to make parallel programs without understanding distributed systems. It's not always hard. It's not generally hard. The complex bits are hard. The simple bits use 8th grade math.
> This is not true. They would be required to release their PostGIS patches in this situation.

There's a license that actually works this way, namely the eupl. If drew is especially interested in having a license that works this way, perhaps he should consider adopting that license instead?
"Does Glyphosate Affect the Human Microbiota?"

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/5/707

"Abstract:

Glyphosate is the world’s most widely used agrochemical. Its use in agriculture and gardening has been proclaimed safe because humans and other animals do not have the target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS). However, increasing numbers of studies have demonstrated risks to humans and animals because the shikimate metabolic pathway is present in many microbes. Here, we assess the potential effect of glyphosate on healthy human microbiota. Our results demonstrate that more than one-half of human microbiome are intrinsically sensitive to glyphosate. However, further empirical studies are needed to determine the effect of glyphosate on healthy human microbiota.

...

4. Conclusions

Hence, does glyphosate affect the human microbiota? Contemporary research points to the herbicide’s potential to disrupt healthy microbiomes, including the human microbiome. Several empirical studies have determined the impact of glyphosate-based products on wild- and host-associated microbiota and called to control the potentially negative consequences on environmental health and sustainability. However, further empirical studies are needed to find a “smoking gun” that determines the effect of glyphosate on the healthy human microbiota. Moreover, additional experimental and epidemiological studies are needed to determine these proposed effects of glyphosate-based products on wild and host-associated microbes to control their potentially negative consequences on human health and ecosystem functions and services."

Other:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=human+microbiome+glypho...
"Problem that effects the entire fleet of cars" vs "they're lying" is a false dichotomy. Personally I think it's more likely that they're not lying and this particular car had a manufacturing defect.

But you seem to be very confident that it couldn't be a manufacturing defect with this particular car. How did you manage to rule this out?
OpenBSD or NetBSD would be better than Linux if you wanted to delve into operating system internals, or you wanted to operate the OS at a more direct explicit level. They are more straight forward in their implementation - modern Linux has more layers of abstraction (udev, dbus, systemd etc) which are useful but more complex.

Other than that, it mostly would come down to licensing or subjective taste questions.
You give all of your assets to your child, but only in a conservatorship that dissolves after your death. Then you don't have to hope the child is willing to support you.
>you'll need to work pretty hard to say you have better sources than what I am reading every day.

Is it some sort of competition? Honestly, you should really stop reading all of it. It's very manipulative. Stick to first hand accounts if you must.
I used lists exclusively, which presented a non-optimized reverse order (most recent first) timeline.
Boot.dev is a good backend focused option too
I have no issue with domestic production, just when its done in places that inevitably lead to the children getting significantly elevated rates of disease due to proximity and poor land use decisions.
I think you're right:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThinkPad_X_series#X200_and_X20...

Wonder what he would think of: https://puri.sm

though honestly thinkpad keyboards are pretty nice.

EDIT: hmmm... none certified: https://ryf.fsf.org/products
I dearly hope that there isn't much reselling of hardware keys/wallets going on, that's indeed a nice and simple recipe for disasters.
For me, the biggest challenge is that the job listings on whos hiring are almost never hardware based, so it pretty much completely eliminates it. There are some hardware listings on the ycombinator job search portal, but its pretty minimal and the search tags are kinda meh. Just wish there were more hardware startups in general.
Why is this replacing "y" with "i"?

I naturally read "iear" as "ear", not "year". And I read "awai" as something similar to "uh-why" (I'm having trouble translating the exact sound to text).

Other than that, I see no issues with the changes through year 5. It's not that hard to read and I'm sure I would quickly get used to it with practice. Past year 5, I don't understand what is happening and I literally can't read it.
Show HN: CopilotTextarea/> = an open-source, AI-infused react <textarea>
CopilotKit is an open-source typescript library giving you the ability to inject powerful AI-features anywhere users write text.

Current Features:
1. Set Purpose Prompts
2. AI auto-complete
3.Refrence External Context
4.Insertions
Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineering, Henry W. Ott
Dose is a part of poison. Water is toxic in high does, as is oxygen.
I always liked Bill Gurley's take on LinkedIn (paraphrasing):

"I only ever accept connection requests from people I 100% know to be honest, smart and good judges of character. That way, if I meet some new person, I look them up and see they are connected to someone I know: I immediately call the shared connection and ask their opinion."
What’s the harm?
Most people don’t choose where to live based on taxes, including me. Healthcare, lifestyle, family, political climate, job opportunities, overall affordability, safety, the rule of law, and other similar factors matter far more to me. But you do you.

But moving countries often won’t solve your problem, unless you pick one country before starting your business and reside there indefinitely thereafter.

Why? Because the big picture of the tax regime you describe isn’t unique to Germany, though of course the precise details are unique in each country. It’s broadly common for countries with residency-based taxation for individuals, so basically everywhere but the US and Eritrea, to have some form of exit tax for individuals who relocate abroad that includes the value of corporate shares held at the time of the move.

Even the US has such an exit tax for many cases (not all) of renouncing citizenship or abandoning long-term permanent residence.
Eh, I don't see anything wrong with that. You have to rename the company. "Agilent" and and "Hewlett Packard" are taken. So you pick a name and make up some marketing fluff to justify it.

"Keysight" sounds like "key insight," which is what you get from decent test equipment. They could have done much worse.
Instead of reaching for this horribly irritating snark (I'm sure GP understands market making enough to understand why HFT exists), why not be charitable and consider the opportunity cost of the smartest people spending their mental energy to create a slightly more efficient market? Is this really a responsible use of this resource?
It's "underpaid" in the sense of like, if teams would pay him more in the absence of the salary cap, which the other posters kindly reminded me of, then his "true" salary is higher than his current.
Peer review means someone knowledgeable about the subject read the paper and didn't spot anything wrong. They almost never attempt to reproduce anything.
I still continue to read comments like those though - there is a chance I might make sense of a word! But I did find myself laughing as I read the original post thinking about how this sounds like a word salad.
This is the year of the paperless office...
There's a long-running construction zone near my house where the road narrows to a single lane (it's a two-way street). At first they had flaggers at both ends controlling traffic, but at some point they rolled in some portable traffic light thingies that have cameras on them and do appear to work this way. I am a little suspicous of it though since the other day I noticed the light turn green for me while the last oncoming car was still clearing the street.
Doesn't say if they drove through flood waters or just heavy rain. If the former, then perhaps the owners were expecting something for nothing. This article seems bent on spreading irresponsible misinformation rather than bringing evidence or clarity.