skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So far, AMD doesn't do the p-core/e-core thing. All cores will have the same ISA. They have talked about a "compact" core which seems to be a tweaked process that shrinks the core and decreases peak clocks a bit, meant to cram more cores into one chip. If CPU designs were like software, you might think of this a bit like someone choosing compiler flags to optimize for size instead of absolute speed, but still compiling the same sources.

I'm not sure what footnotes the earlier poster meant. One might be that the AMD model numbering is a bit obscure. You need to look closely that you are getting a Zen 4 core in your Ryzen, with the same model line mixing different CPU and GPU architectures in different models. I don't know if there are programmer-visible differences in what AVX-512 means to AMD vs Intel...
Well they use it to avoid international sanctions but International Remittance is extremely common.

The fees of which are estimated to be over 5% [1]; I mean imagine losing 5% of your paycheck just because of currency problems!

The current Etherum TX fee is 0.0004 which at 1 ETH / 1,573.09 USD comes out to 62 cents.

Would your rather pay 5% of your transfer to send money home to your family or 62 cents?

[1]: https://fbf.eui.eu/what-explains-international-remittance-fe...
I don’t get the reasoning behind saying that if the market would be real, the market cap would be a fraction of what it is now. Like, how do you determine that?
Goa trance was the sub-genre of psytrance that I really loved in the early 2000s.

Astral Projection, Infected Mushroom, Neuromotor, Goa Gil.

'99 I was in Goa, when everyone thought that Y2K was the end of the world!

Can still remember 25 thousand people dancing on the beach in Anjuna!

It was quite an experience!

Heck I was at one gig where Goa Gil played a set straight for 24 hrs!
Bom Shankar!!
Thanks for the context! Although you could have made that more clearer in your comment, and you are still leaving me to infer the details from your links. But anyways, I see your point now (weird that your comment was already downvoted).
I'm sure you can see how this is a bit more newsworthy than regular cable cuts that are business as usual.
In the EU, debit cards (with EU-capped interchange, and no debt mechanism) are the majority, and there's nothing that points toward that limiting low-income populations' access to banking or card networks.

Can't speak here for entire EU, only France, but opening a bank account or getting a basic debit card requires no minimum proof of income, and typically have no fees associated. No financial barrier to entry for any population segment.
Do people not realize that "godfather" implies that the person wasn't directly involved with bringing that thing into the world? That would be just "father".

That, or they're the head of the AI Mafia.
I too discovered sizecoding through dwitter way past the original demoscene era, but I think codegolfing with javascript scratches a similar CS/math/language tricks itch. Had a lot of fun with dwitter, and it definitely helped me feel more fluent in coding for work, just from all the practice even though optimizing 140bytes and SWE-ing multiple thousand line files are two different niches at first glance.
Too difficult, some are actually both!

Try searching for Yamaha FX-1, it is both a home organ and a jet ski.
> I think the 'drying up' only applies to OpenAI

they couldn't chew through 10B from MSFT that fast?..
Hmm I wouldn't say it never happens we are building a large system (in cybersec space) and there is like a dozen + teams that are delivering their respective frontend functionality as microfrontends. The experience has being fairly reasonable so far. Very likely because each team's app is fairly isolated.
Bold. While everything is perfectly fine HTM, you still need to HTM.
How much does it cost to trademark a brand globally? Or at least in major markets? Hiw long before someone starts trademarking uuids?
By making their own implementation of a Java LSP they could integrate this in any number of editors and IDEs, including JetBrains products:

https://blog.jetbrains.com/platform/2023/07/lsp-for-plugin-d...
That's fine but I'm not going to hear calls of "our democracy" if the idea is a unelected permanent government is really in charge beacuse congress refuses to work more than 2 days a week.
Stock trading API developer Alpaca raises $15M convertible note from SBI Group
I think you can get free stock data from Tradier after creating an account.
Intel says they're going to leapfrog TSMC by releasing Intel 20A before TSMC N2.
Thanks for that - I was wondering why it sounded so familiar (actually I had this name on my board games to-buy list for quite some time : https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/304783/hadrians-wall)
Are there any other languages where typing is purely optional and yet so much effort is going into developing the typing system?

I started experimenting with Kotlin just when Python was starting to get type hints and after my experience with Kotlin I am totally sold on the benefits of typing. So to me it's great to see these recent developments. It just feels weird to me to have a language that is fundamentally dynamically typed (and committed to that paradigm) invest so much effort in developing this elaborate but optional typing system.
I had a very long chat with one of the telemarketers once, trying my best to be very empathic and appealing to her humananity. I eventually hung up feeling defeated since she did an amazing job always defaulting to her agenda, and not giving in to my hippy svada in a very polite manner.

I'd be curious to hear how your approach works out.
Ultimate best scenario would be to get completely removed from their lists - but I've almost given up hope on talking sense, and my provider, leaving Fire versus Fire.
1) It looks like both links got cut off, though the Figma one still works.

2) I can't help you with your request to contact the founders, but are you interested in others' feedback of your redesign?
And what unjust laws in the US is crypto letting people circumvent?
Bitcoin has achieved its promise: "A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution."

There is no credible evidence that Bitcoin is being "held afloat by manipulation", that's just wishful thinking. It is also a very liquid market: billions of dollars in daily volume.

> BTC has close to zero barrier to entry

That's wrong. Mining power is a big one. Some other barriers: developer mind share, network effect, branding, perceived fairness of initial distribution, software ecosystem, etc. If it was easy to "replace in a second", it wouldn't still be the top cryptocurrency.

Like I said, you might want to reconsider your sources of information.
> Don't you think `x["foo"] == 5` but `x.foo == 4` is a hell of a lot confusing ?

No, having used lots of OO languages before JS and its “objects are dictionaries are arrays and member access and string indexing and integer indexing are all equivalent and can be used interchangeably, except you can't use member access where the key isn't a valid identifier” approach, which I find more confusing and error prone (though I’ve since had to use JS enough to be proficient in that, too.)

Indexing an object as an indexable collection and accessing a member (field, property, or method) of the object are fundamentally different things, and having a collection item with a particular string index isn’t the same thing as an object member with a similar identifier name.

This use of objects as also quasi-associative-arrays is so broken that JS’s actual associative-array type (Map) can’t use indexing notation because of it, and has to use .get() and .set() instead, unlike the associative array types of most other dynamic languages (and several statically-typed OO languages).

The JS way is less bad as a type-specific behavior (e.g., Ruby ActiveSupport’s HashWithIndifferentAccess), though.
Wrong.

This is a case where at first sight it appears that BoA is in a bad situation. On further analysis it appears this is a non-issue, for the reasons you explained. But going further still, it's obvious it IS an issue. And your flaw is assuming that when a bank says "we're holding them to maturity", they're holding them to maturity.

You see, SV did the same thing. They took some assets that they planned to hold to maturity if all goes well, but then used the same assets to tell regulators "don't worry guys, we have enough liquidity because there's these things here which we can sell if we really need to". Before SV went bankrupt a naive observer could've asked the question: if all clients decided to pull money, did they have enough liquidity without having to touch these assets, and the answer would've been No.

Whether this is a problem for BoA depends on the answer to this same question. It's far from obvious that this is a non-issue.
Is there a reason this is on the frontpage, were there updates? Because 3.12 is out since two weeks. Am I missing something?
> Don't you think `x["foo"] == 5` but `x.foo == 4` is a hell of a lot confusing ?

No. They're different notations; one means `x.__getitem__('foo')` and the other means `x.__getattribute__('foo')`. Why should they be the same? It isn't confusing that `5-4 == 1` but `5+4 == 9`, after all.

If we assume that the dict class was enhanced with your proposed equivalence, would you want `d['items']` to be the function `d.items`? Would that not make 'items' a forbidden key?
If you'd like to know where the demoscene came from, look no further than The BBS Documentary[1]

The whole thing started w/ cracktros in the 80s and through the artscene it eventually evolved into its own scene that was entirely disconnected from its roots in piracy.

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dddbe9OuJLU&list=PL7nj3G6Jpv...
Try posting as a Maoist.
1) see response above

2) a lot of existing solutions such as loanpro are good at supporting "vanilla" credit products, but tend to struggle with "chocolate & sprinkles on top" like configurations. we've talked to so many companies who told us that after they purchased these existing solutions, but had to spend another 3-6mths+ of engineer resources to configure it to their use case, and even that is still quite brittle with more manual involvements.

these configurations impact the entire loan cycle from origination, APR calcs, state rules and many more. for example, repayment cycles pegged to salary schedules, irregular 1st payment date, balloon payments, min payment for lines of credit, etc.
In my opinion, yes. But I still feel the better route to increasing spermidine is finding out if you are deficiency in arginine, manganese, B6 or one of the several cofactors for the methylation cycle.
I've conducted a handful of actual real transactions using it (over 10+ years) and I'm hardly a crypto advocate. I suspect that I'm the exception, and that even those who had the glowing eyes in their avatar and changed their username to "something.eth" rarely ever use it as an actual currency.
What is a saner specialty then? I’m getting tired of web dev because I’m getting too old to keep running on the treadmill.

But what’s a better specialty (more stable, doesn’t change every week, large number of opportunities)? iOS or Android development? Something else?
Not to get all “orientalism” but celebrity scandal is a pretty big deal in Japan and South Korea. It can kill a career quite easy, for (by US standards) innocuous things. Smoking pot, spicy selfies, having a significant other - it’s not uncommon.

Japan at least is also fairly receptive to artificial spokespeople, like mascots and avatars. Maybe there’s simply higher demand for this, and turning to AI is a good strategy. (I’m personally bothered by it.)
I know this is highly EU-country dependent, but paying monthly fees for banking in USA is incredibly easy to avoid, but harder to avoid in EU.

Could say the rich subsidize the poor in USA (by keeping more in 0.0001% interest checking accounts and more card swipes per month).
> I'm sick of subsidizing other people's airline mile because Target charges us the same price no matter how we pay

You should actually love this because fees paid by the merchant are pure gravy for you as the customer. If they could charge more and get away with they should just do that. Externalizing the interchange costs would be a huge win for merchants because they just got free money while keeping the sticker price the same. All the benefit of hidden fees without the needing to hide it part, just like taxes. It would do nothing except make everything 2%ish more expensive for card users while you gain nothing. If you've ever wondered why companies push so hard against requiring display prices to include tax this is why. It's not the high cost of label printing, it's that they would just have to eat the 7% because they can't just hike prices without consumers reacting to it.

Have you never noticed that despite the fact that different retail outlets take wildly different cuts it never manifests in significant price differences? "Cut out the middleman and buy direct" is often the most expensive way to buy something.
First-order logic explanation in Wikipedia
That was Voyager 1 [0].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_Dot
It's weird how different it goes for each person. My little family got it the summer of 22 (tested positive too) and while I felt like flu for about a week, my wife was completely out for two days with very high fever then nothing, and the daughter only lost smell and taste for two weeks.
As someone who works in the antibot space for a FAANG, this type of solution can actually be very effective initially. Bad adversaries will adjust their TTP's (Tactics, techniques and procedures) accordingly - I wouldn't be surprised if ATO (account take overs) rise to compensate for paywalling on new accounts.

I really respect the dedication to removing the huge problem of bots in the social space and I feel the ripple effect could be tremendous if a big dent is made.
Azure launches Radius, a new open application platform for the cloud
TLDR; They have knocked the Shors algorithm complexity to n^1.5 in time and space. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
Nevertheless, the ad seems to have achieved its goal of attracting attention.
> What are fields where a few big winners outperform everyone else? Here are some obvious ones: sports, politics, art, music, acting, directing, writing, math, science, starting companies, and investing.

What’s really interesting is that out of that entire list, only math and science are publicly funded at a level such that a person can get 5 to 7 years of guaranteed job security and funding(ie a PhD), giving you plenty of shots on goal.

From this point of view the science/math path seems obvious. Even if you don’t find gold during your PhD, you still get a PhD and have access to a host of industry, startup, or postdoc positions.

The failure path for writers, painters, or jazz musicians is more risky in my opinion.
Sure, but all of that is preferable to someone getting pwned across all of their accounts for one of their accounts getting leaked.

Though I don't necessarily grant your points. Password reuse means you're susceptible to nontargeted attacks which is strictly worse than your concerns, like #2.

i.e. Filtering out weaker attacks doesn't mean you're more susceptible to stronger attacks.
Yeah, "person I've never seen before" doesn't give any clout to the product. Why would I care if that person drinks it?

Other than the appearance that it took like 30 years off her hair and skin, that is.
If only there were some kind of information pump that could convert heat into information and vice versa. Then you could decide which calculations to run depending on whether you want to cool or heat your room. ;-)
One problem I see with the store of value idea, in the long run, is that I don't know if BTC's double spend prevention will survive its design.

The point of mining is to prevent double spend attacks. It does this in a rather brute-force way: the network as a whole always maintains a higher hashrate than any attacker. The network always out-spends the attacker to maintain security. As described in my prior comment the funding for this massive hashrate comes from newly generated BTC.

But Bitcoin is designed to wean itself off of emitting new coins as a mining reward. This is done by halving the block reward arbitrarily every 4 years. This is necessary to fulfill the promise that there will only ever be 21M coins, which has been a huge selling point to anti-inflation investors.

Ultimately the mining is supposed to be funded entirely by fees. But there is no market mechanism to ensure that fees "make up for" the lost emissions of new coins. The only reason to pay a high transaction fee is if there is high transaction volume, causing blocks to fill up, so you are competing for space with other people trying to make transactions. If transaction volume is fairly low, fees remain low. You can see fees only become a meaningful part of the reward at times of unusually high volume[0].

So, it seems plausible to me that if Bitcoin mining was funded entirely on transaction fees, the total mining reward would not be high enough to sustain enough hashrate to be impervious to 51% by a powerful attacker. That's especially true if most users are holding onto BTC as a store of value not attempting to transact in it. As far as I know, there is no successful cryptocurrency that functions using fees alone. Bitcoin is in a very slow march towards being the first to do that.

Basically the network is currently funded with a "tax" on holders of BTC -- newly generated coins dilute the value of held coins. This to me makes a lot of sense for a store-of-value. But the coin is trying to transition to funding security with a "tax" on users of BTC. Nobody really knows whether this will work. In fact nobody knows how much is the "correct" amount for the network to spend on mining at all. All we know is that with the current level of spending we haven't had a 51% attack yet. Are we spending 2x more than needed? 10x? 100x? It's impossible to say but the design of BTC seems like a slowwwww experiment to find the level at which it fails.

[0]https://charts.bitbo.io/fees-percent-of-reward/
Seems like a religious argument that can never be proven or disproven.
Probably controversial but I did lose a ton of weight before my sense of smell and taste came back from COVID. Part of me wondered whether it would've been better for my long term physical health to have that sense of taste stay gone...on the flip side, my mental health would've suffered greatly. Food is such an amazing way to experience the world and other cultures.
It's the same ranking algorithm but only votes from users who registered in the first year count.
Effective Altruism Is as Bankrupt as Sam Bankman-Fried's FTX
Check out the https://haveibeenpwned.com API.
https://archive.ph/0s3jn
Can we get that data from China's experience after dropping the zero-COVID policy in Dec 2022?

If I understand correctly, at that time, only a tiny slice of the population had been exposed to previous COVID variants, and something like 80% has since gotten it. It looks like the vaccination rate was something like 90% at the time, but that should still be a pretty large naive population to look at, of people who were exposed to Omicron & later with no original/Delta exposure.
They will suffer in the profits department due to this. If they're making 1% when they could be making 5% on 450 billion or whatever the total original balance of HTM was then their stock will be rightfully crushed. (actually has already been rightfully crushed)
But then their playtime projects may turn into your next big product :)
Women didn't get the vote by illegally voting, slavery was outlawed in the end not just circumvented - the ability to change unjust laws is what matters in the end for the health of a society.

Just some sort of disobedience technology without plans for change and active work on that (including majority building and policy proposals) is not going to cut it.

You want functioning societies not some dystopia with a tech underground.
That's something I didn't get for a long time

There is a difference between being smart and effective
> you will be hiring people who aren't going to be satisfied with the day to day duties and looking to change teams to a team who is using new things or leave

I don't know about this. I've been able to convince several developers to put down their shiny in favor of trying out some classic options. They seem to enjoy their newly-discovered traction. Progress feels good regardless of how you're achieving it after a while.

I did have to provide starting points & patterns, but it didn't seem to take much. I think they key is proving the value around why the old tools are (likely) better. Just lecturing a young person verbally about this and that is almost certain to send them even deeper into their rabbit hole.

If the mission is vague with uncertain upside associated with completion, you will absolutely find everyone fucking off in different directions as convenient. If you somehow frame the mission more like "ship by Christmas and everyone gets a 50k bonus", you can usually convince even the biggest 'not my job' assholes to adapt to changing realities.

Leadership is at the heart of why some companies are simple and others are running a technological clown show.
Total tangent, but a street a couple of blocks away has been getting resurfaced, and man! Some piece of heavy equipment sounds like a diesel truck idling a few meters away.

I can't believe how much the noise transfers.

> speed limit

I'd probably have to quit that job. I at least need the autonomy to drive the vehicle if I'm the one risking my life in it

This seems like the future, though. I'm sure some tech will be developed to do this to everyone, probably with a punitive system attached, per usual.
Some people enjoy building a business, not running one.
I'm really not sure that you'll get that much power savings. Given the idle consumption of a drive is ~6W I'm actually surprised my 10 year old server/NAS only consumes about 110W for a system with 10 drives, 10GBase-T, 8 DIMMs, Intel 3930k and fans/some USB peripherals.

I should try testing under some load however.
Home mortgage rates are an essential aspect to consider when purchasing a home
And to the authors final point that it’s a slower changing version of the homepage then….what’s the point?
There's a lot of discussion of the details in this thread but I don't want people to miss the big picture: No one should buy Intel processors under any circumstances. All Intel processors suck now. Maybe that will change in the future, but if you're buying anything today, buy AMD.
If only I had thought of that.. Unfortunately, you were only allowed to convert to the Binance coin. That option did not work for me, I can't recall what the specific issue was now but I am guessing had something to do with KYC.
> As long as the old server is up, the timestamps are readily available

But among the scenarios we have to expect for users wanting to migrate an account from system A to system B in the fediverse are ones where the user’s departure from the original server is not amicable, or voluntary. And, yes, where the source server has just blown up and vanished.
Paycheck to paycheck customers have low bank balances, so the interest rate doesn't matter because there's no principal. The banks could have them as customers because of debit card fees paying the costs. But they became unprofitable overnight when the Durbin amendment went into effect, which is why banks started to implement monthly fees (in addition to overdraft fees etc).

Yes, credit unions and neobanks can charge higher swipe fees so they can bank them. But under this new proposal, maybe not anymore.
10 GHz Optical Transistor Built Out of Silicon (2012)
It seems you have answered your own question.