skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I go with the flow whenever possible. The more lazy I allow myself to get the more productive hours and days are following.

I know that doesn't adapt to student life at all. Back when I needed to get productive ashwaghanda and later prescription amphetamines were helpful. But that led me directly into a burnout so I wouldn't recommend going the amphetamine route. Ash is amazing still
Isn't it obvious?

Your mind has limited capacity for diffucult mental work.
After you have used it all, you need time to restore yourself.

You can use several strategies:

* Smooth it out: work less on a productive day so you can work more on an unproductive day
* Improve your capacity for work: diet, sleep, exercise. there is a bazilion things written on the topic, find what works for you.
* Adapt work to your capability. If you have unproductive day, do unproductive things. For example, you can attend meetings, write emails, or take the day off entirely and do something physical.

There is not much else that could be done, you can over extend yourself so you
could become sick or burn out. But I don't think that it is best for you in the long term

Love, Emma

Edit: formatting, I am new to the editor on this site
> why do people make businesses to sell them?

Think of it as specialization. Some people are best in the wear-many-hats start up stage where everything is scrappy and there aren't a lot of rules and structure. And if they want the business to continue to grow and prosper, eventually that environment needs to change.

And sometimes people who are good at the startup stage have trouble transitioning into a more mature phase of a business's lifetime. In which case, it's probably more responsible to sell it to someone who can properly nurture it.
I'm much more concerned about the West's 'epic scale' of espionage of its citizens.
call it donationware then. that sets the expectations of people accordingly
Can't you use the APIs without accepting the TOS?
Yeah, that's usually the thing; 'we are working as fast as we can for you, but this department is really busy' for something that takes 5 minutes. And that for weeks.
Mergers & Acquisitions (I think)
never get married to a position. whether I bought shares in my trading portfolio, or created shares in a new business, its all to sell them at a higher price.

your unfamiliarity with that concept is because you are segregated from the market almost completely in your scientist example, you are subsidized by programs where it’s completely mystical why the funding runs out when it does, as opposed to rapidly iterating on marketable things as a means to an end

I also have a couple of non-profit entities now, those are specially incentivized to dump otherwise sunk cost ideas into, but they are not sunk cost in a non profit. there is no reason to ever do this outside of that structure

privatize the gains, socialize the losses, thats the whole philosophy. it is predicated on actually having gains to begin with.
I kind of get it and as I am aging I get it more and more. You are avoiding headache and actually putting cost to that time spent and stress added to your life. Sometimes it's just not worth it to engage. Not same, but I will put it in the direction of paying a bribe (again, I didn't say same or even same level).
The dubstep section deserves a special mention in a similar way:

"You ever have one of those really sticky poos where you've pinched it off but it's clinging to your sphincter for dear life, and you don't want to get up and wipe because that would take a lot of toilet paper, so you just kinda sit there helpless, and maybe wiggle around a bit to try and shake it off?

And then after a few minutes gravity does its job and the turd finally detaches from your rectum and drops into the bowl with a satisfying ker-plunk?

Well guess what: They make music like that now."
I personally am pretty fine with using Ishkur's guide on my own, searching by myself what I like and filtering out what I don't like, and knowing what's what I don't like and why. I've been going back to it for the last 3 years and I'm not even half the road, yet.
As an ex-lawyer I'd say this was 100% a good decision. As a profession we make our living off people who say "Dammit I won't pay, it's the principle, it's wrong & immoral." I, and I suspect many other lawyers, would always reply that principles cost a fortune in money time and grey hairs. I had plenty of clients and didn't need to litigate for billable hours.
I think the penny has dropped and people have realized his essays aren't actually very original and mostly contain obvious advice or stuff copied from someone else and re-worded.
This is not entirely true. Some brain cells and the cells in your eye lens will be there your entire life and could even potentially live longer if they were not limited by the rest of the body. Cancer is definitely a lot more than just immortal cells.
This also applies in non-business contexts.

If you have a nice open source project, minecraft server, web forum, whatever: get rid of the assholes. Even if they are a highly capable person, in the end it's not worth it. They'll turn off other valuable community members, cause drama, and shift the general atmosphere to the worse.
Here's a different proof of the identity just thinking of M, M* as operators (not as matrices). So, the invariant way of 'diagonalization by a unitary matrix' means that we have to find an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors. We can always find one eigenvalue λ and the complex numbers. The strategy is to choose one eigenvector v and say that its complement subspace is also preserved by the action of M. This complement subspace, being of lower dimension, already has an orthonormal basis by induction and this basis extended with v will be the required basis. This strategy can be done in a straightforward way if we assume M is hermitian M*=M (or symmetric matrix for real numbers). <v,w>=0 ⇒ <v,Mw>=<M*v,w>=<Mv,w>=0. So, M preserves the complement and the matrix is diagonlizable. This is the Spectral Theorem.

For a normal matrix, we have to choose the vector v which is simultaneously an eigenvector for M and M*. Then the proof still works as <v,w>=0 implies <v, Mw> = <M*v,w> = λ'<v,w>=0 where λ' is the eigenvalue of v with respect to M*.

We can find such a shared eigevector v as M, M* commute implies that M* will preserve the eigenspaces of M.
PHP solves so many problems to do with deployments and scalability automatically.

- You don't need to explicitly install your replacement code and start that server (java -jar .... / node server.js )

- You don't need a systemd unit to keep your server running ( you can deploy as many PHP files as you like and they'll all be "running" )

- You don't have to worry about keeping your server up (the php file).

- You don't need to use Docker because PHP is pretty stable target.

- You're not forced to deploy Kubernetes or Docker swarm to deploy code infront of users.

- You could use Ansible to deploy your PHP but you can probably just use git.

- You can spin up multiple servers and deploy the same file to them all and nginx and php-fpm shall handle concurrency and parallelism for you since each PHP session is independent and stateless.
I'm a new-comer to the genres, myself, despite my age. For some reason the D&B/trances/technos scene never clicked with me back in my metal days, but it fills a gap that needed filling in my life now.

That said, there's plenty of great modern artists, too...however, some amazing stuff was happening back in the day that I missed out on, and it is a treat to discover that now.
Interesting approach. I looked at the site, haven't played with it yet.

I've been thinking my workflows in a similar way to you, but came to a different conclusion. What I need is an interface that ties together all the threads of a given task and puts them in one place.

Let's say that for a given "thing to get done" I have information stored in various locations:
1. multiple email threads in my inbox (sales, PO, ELT, etc). They are in various states: actionable by me, waiting for reply (to follow up by X date if none), paused until X date then actionable, etc. Threads change state as emails are exchanged.
2. multiple related chat windows (dev team, peers, support triage, etc)
3. a litter of notes, meeting minutes, random thoughts, rough drafts, bookmarks (to internal documents, related wikis, JIRA tickets, external web pages, meeting recordings, project plans). Note that I have boiled a lot of stuff down to this "notes" category - I use a notes app to store this all already even though the actual content is spread across multiple locations.

My ideal interface would embed all of this together.

Imagine the bastard child of OneNote, Outlook, and maybe Teams. To use OneNote terms: I add a Section for my "thing to do"; all the shit in #3 goes in a hierarchy of pages under it. In a page I can have the related email threads in an embedded mini-inbox widget - no more swapping to Outlook, no more bullshit with flags/folders etc. Same for related chat windows - a widget in the related section. State tracking and deadline/reminder/scheduling etc for everything.

Anyway I ramble. What you have built is very cool! But I don't want an app grid, I want my inbox and chats sharded across my structured notes in a way that I can organise and annotate.
I've used joe since the late '90s. First job on install is to remove the space in front of "-nobackups" in /etc/joe/joerc.

I have to remember when using nano not to exit with ctrl-k, x or else end up losing a random line 8)
I think they are just an optimization, like precompiled header files. Theoretically they could probably take the form of C++ module interface units without implementation, but that wouldn't gain you that much in terms of compilation time.
Thanks for correcting me! That reference is even cooler than I expected.
Ah, thats what I meant! The shell that `iterm2` logs in with, not `chsh`. I was a bit ambiguous there.
Now if only Canada’s largest bookstor, Indigo, would do this. Instead their CEO is intent on moving in the opposite direction.

“Mr. Ruis is planning a major expansion in categories such as cookware, tech gadgets and beauty products. “It’s not four or five things; it’s about 400 or 500 that we’re busily beavering away, trying to bring them to market,” he says, sitting in a boardroom at Indigo’s Toronto offices.”

https://paulwells.substack.com/p/the-rideau-centre-indigo-st...
> Guess who has a strong interest in the holding company? He does! Here we have a broker, purportedly acting for the seller in a transaction, who also benefits from a holding company as a buyer. I'm not a lawyer, but if that's not a conflict I don't know what is.

What government authority regulates this kind of broker (e.g., is there a fiduciary responsbility?), and investigates conflicts of interest like the one alleged here?

Or is that entirely a civil matter?
Haven't read the manifesto but the article did get quite a few things right. If anything they underestimated a few things and were overly optimistic on the politics side. For example, the US hasn't really moved on health care. China seems to be stagnating.

One topic that was woefully underestimated is that of alternative energy and batteries. The article talks about Toyota and hybrids and basically parrots their version of the future as of 25 years ago. Which of course half happened and then stopped happening entirely. Because another thing happened that the article missed: lithium ion batteries. Those were invented in the early nineties. By 2008, Tesla had its roadster on the roads. And by now batteries can power everything with wheels from heavy mining vehicles, Australian 200 tonne road trains, heavy trucks, vans, cars, muscle cars, super cars, bikes, scooters, etc. You name it and there probably already is a company doing a battery electric version of it.

The bigger topic with energy is that clean energy also means cheap energy. And this is creating the next boom. A lot of stuff in our economy is bottle necked on energy being expensive and dirty. Renewable energy solves both problems: it's clean and cheap. And that's starting to unlock a whole lot of new growth that looks like it might define the rest of this century.
As a somewhat successful businessperson that has hit rough patches: yes, the rose-colored glasses of financial success are real, but you also have to account for the bias around these people: society (to say nothing of close friends, family, partners, subordinates, social acquaintances, etc) is biased favorably towards people that a) act, and b) produce results. This is more easily seen when you lose some of that success: it isn't necessarily that people like you less (or kiss your ass less), it's also (mostly) that they take you less seriously.

In a lot of circumstances, action itself (the courage to take it, the risk tolerance to deal with the outcome) is an outlier act. By definition (or selection bias) successful entrepreneurs are more likely to take action and deal with the results. What does it say about a society (or an era) that this is all we have left? that action/initiative itself carries such risks (financial, social) that our heroes (and villains) are quasi-psychopathic risk-taking billionaires because they are the only ones left willing to step up?
That is not accurate. Israel is seeking to destroy Hamas, not Gaza. Hamas must be utterly destroyed. Unfortunately they hide among the civilians, cowards as they are.
It would be open washing if you couldn't look at the source code, but you can.
You're certainly not getting smarter. It's the test format that is not very reliable.
In the absence of a very strong justification, my assumption for any random technique in an AI paper is that they tried a bunch of different things and whatever gave the highest evals made it into the paper (even though that performance is likely random not a genuine improvement)
> online banks

You keep using that word and it's masking the real problem here.

The problem is that this company isn't a bank and isn't regulated as a bank. If they were a bank this wouldn't be happening. There would be recourse.

Use banks. Keep your money in regulated institutions. History has countless examples why.

I'm just gonna come out here and say 'don't use fintech companies'
FYI that is not entirely true. Public cameras aren't common or normal here in Switzerland and many surrounding countries. I know that because it's unusual enough that I instantly feel watched in ex. German cities where this is more common.

What you describe I've only really seen in Asia, Germany or really touristic squares in poorer countries in Europe.
It really isn't that hard to trigger to them, the UK Sanctions List[0] is huge, and contains quite a lot of broad descriptions that doubtless result in people getting swept up in automated checks of the list. Is your name Ali Khalili? Cool, you're on the sanctions list, because that's literally all the identifying factors provided for an Iranian general. I'm sure once it flags the bank will reasonably quickly take a look at your details and realise you're not in fact an Iranian general, but that will take time, and in the meantime your account has been frozen.

[0] https://docs.fcdo.gov.uk/docs/UK-Sanctions-List.html
A customer credit card is yet another barrier for bots. Since the finance industry is so strictly regulated, you can imagine that it'll actually be quite hard to get fresh credit cards for your bots at scale.
Most US gov't systems probably run RedHat Enterprise Linux. So, yeah, they do pay to develop GNU+Linux and lots of other FOSS.
From the title I expected to see another bunch of AI services (like top-10). But it's more than that, thanks :)
> why do people make businesses to sell them?

Money to go do something else.
Ask HN: Why has more people started calling themselfs software engineer?
Why doesn't people want to call themselfs software developer? Does Software engineer sound better?
I'm just amazed at how they can market and sell their products that don't even work as they should. Every day at my company we have so many issues with Teams, it makes me wonder if wr're paying millions for an indie software.
You're my man, I'm thinking about the same! E.g. Look at TIPC.
Creators can create a polycentric identity and link their platforms together using the Harbor app.
If you are then subscribed to their YouTube channel, you will also see content they post on any other platform like Patreon, etc.

You subscribe to the creator, not the platform identity.

There are also very simple dedup algorithms to try and deduplicate your feed. However, they can probably still be improved.
He called it open source, not floss, didn't he?

It's not shared source, since anyone is able to inspect the source code, not just a subset of people
Over 34k Hosts Currently Infected Due to Cisco iOS XE Vulnerability
It's possible that others routes of administration have better absorption than oral.
https://simplePDF.eu if you want to annotate (add fields, checkboxes, signatures) and manipulate the PDF files (merge, delete, rotate...).

Since you mentioned Preview (the Mac alternative to Adobe Acrobat), I assume that's what you're after.

Disclosure: I'm the developer behind it
Although it's in alpha, Ruff does have a replacement for Black.
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/main/crates/ruff_pyth...
It would be very nice if once all those sources are aggregated with this tool, including hopefully all YouTube, X, and FB lists, saved items, histories, and browser histories, that all of this can be downloaded as a .CSV we can use to train our own local LLMs.

Getting our data out of these platforms is a feat!
“Press charges” is exactly correct. It literally means a civilian advocating for charges to be filed. (The actual filing of charges is of course something only the state can do).
Just wanted to thank the submitter and the website creator for this lovely resource. I love the selection; it led me to some high quality music. It is hard to find among the mass-produced beats made to assemble "10 hours amazing treynsbibouent" yt videos.
Since it is based on perception, and many people perceive themselves as outside the binary male/female categories, shouldn't the first question about my gender give me more options than just male and female?
People love to hate on PHP then love to love JavaScript. It's bonkers. PHP is clearly better than JavaScript, it's just that we're all forced to use JS.
WizardMath[1] clearly has better benchmark results and they conveniently ignored it. They knew about the model because they have used their dataset.

This has 51.5% in GSM8K compared to 81.6% for WizardMath.

[1]: https://huggingface.co/WizardLM/WizardMath-70B-V1.0
It would be significantly faster
This is the way to go. "A complaint" in the financial world is a very specific thing, it's not just someone having a grumble about things. Financial Conduct Authority regulations mean that once a formal complaint has been raised the company is obliged to resolve that complaint within a specified time frame, and if they don't you can escalate it to the FCA, who on investigating can issue substantial penalties if the company is found to be at fault. All financial companies have internal teams whose entire job is resolving complaints before that happens.
The Lone Deranger was also one of my first (Goa) CDs. Simon Posford is pretty much a hero of the scene. Later found Shpongle and was pretty amazed that is the same guy. Also check out the Younger Brother project, also by him.
It's a very sound business decision.
I'm in the same boat, I guess everyone will like to see the bully being stopped, yet it's hard to act when you have the chance
Funnily enough Wise is the only "non-bank" that currently pays me interest on my money voluntarily (that is going to be fun doing taxes for). All other banks are currently forcing me to open new accounts and shuffle the money (triggering god knows what checks each time I do this).

> Netherlands

Yeah, the neo-liberal tax-haven narco-state :)
There is a book about it called "The no Asshole Rule" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_No_Asshole_Rule#:~:text=Th....
I think Romans used the abacus to calculate.

https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/234881-how-did-the-roma...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_abacus
Lovely article and a very nice C implementation.
Open source does not mean you can look at the source code. Open source is defined by the OSI.

If it is not using and OSI-approved license and claims to be open source it is open washing. Call it shared source or something else.

This is a long since settled debate.
Yeah, that'd make a lot of sense.

With Fortran mod files I believe it's not even backwards compatible for a single compiler: gfortran.

If it's not standardized, you end up recompiling the world, which defies the point.
https://pypi.org/project/pyright/
> But I agree the US is tearing itself apart in the two party war.

It’s remarkable that people continue to frame the US’s problems in this way.

There is only 1 party that has taken the U.S. to the brink every time the debt ceiling has been a factor.

The same party is currently unable to select a speaker within its own caucus.

The same party took the U.S. to decade long wars in the Middle East.

The same party is the only major political party in the world that denies the reality of climate change.

The same party has overseen massive increases in deficits and debts while somehow pretending they will lower both.

There is nothing redeemable about the Republican Party while the worst thing you can probably say about the Democratic Party is that they might spend a little too much, and yet their spending has caused lower increases in deficits than the tax cuts implemented by the Republican Party.

The U.S. has a 1 party problem. The other party is a big standard average Western centrist party at worst.
I think you are reading something into my comment that I did not actually write.
DeutscheBank has free ATM withdrawals as long as it's from Cash Group (Commerzbank, etc...) which are pretty much everywhere.
I agree. I'd love to see more details on what the guy felt he was entitled to. I suspect there was a contract signed early on in their dealings that the author of this blog post is not being forthcoming with.
One thing I learned while buying my home is that most middleman in this kind of environment care more about volume of sales than value of sale, even if they are on commission. Increasing the sale price by 10% might mean 10% more in his bank account at the cost of much more work for himself and missed opportunity of closing other sales.
It is not about the listeners, but about the DJs. The less BPM difference, the easier it is to mix a set.
> why would a business run the same without the person who did all the work doing it?

This is the part that I don't get either. I can imagine hearing "this coffee shop got better since the new owners", but I know I have heard "this place used to be good until it changed owners". And since the new owners have paid X years of profit which they arguably want to recover in less than X years, it is more than likely that they'll start cutting costs as a result.

So I wouldn't have a reason to believe that a business with new owners would run just as well as before, and in fact I would expect the opposite.
Service as a Service :)
That really wasn't the ending I was hoping for here. It almost looks like the legal system is made specifically to benefit these kind of trolls. They can drag cases with no merit over years, leaving you with lawyer fees etc. during that period.
Sadly, the stock of specialised books is much reduced. The mathematics section used to have its own room, ruled with a rod of iron by a fearsome Russian (?) lady. Now reduced to a couple of shelves. Coffee you can get anywhere ...
Newpipe scrapes the HTML, its against the ToS but harder to block.
... or made up ...