skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In other countries such as Argentina and Brazil also exists "veda electoral", is this something uncommon? [1]. It has its fundamentals. In Europe you can see this thread [2].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_silence

[2] https://reddit.com/r/AskEurope/s/17Uoq4jwIa
The link is substack spam. The repo is at https://github.com/valhalla/valhalla.
> Wouldn’t hybrids be more efficient if the gas/diesel was just generating electricity for an electric drivetrain? They do this for logging and mining trucks.

They might be more “efficient” from a maintenance point of view, but they will have worse gas mileage then gas/electric. Anytime you have to transform the energy to another form you loose some of power. So ICE > drivetrain will be more efficient then ICE > generator > drivetrain.
> I do not expect standardization of features that do not exist.

But that makes absolutely no sense, doesn't it? I mean, think about it for a moment. Specifying a standard behavior is not about picking a flawed winner from a list of ad-hoc implementation or settle with the least common denominator. Specifying a standard behavior is about providing the best possible solution that meets the design requirements following the input from the whole community.
The reason the U6-Pro is listed as 4.8Gbit and the U6+ is listed as 1.2Gbit is because the 6+ only supports 2x2 MIMO on 5GHz, whereas the Pro supports 4x4 MIMO.

Most client devices won't go above 2x2 MIMO and many won't support above channel widths greater than 80MHz on 5GHz so your chance of saturating the 1Gbit uplink port is unlikely anyway.
Have a look at https://wmlive.sourceforge.net instead to get a better idea what this is about.
I wonder if off-shore wind could act as a water mister when there is wind/energy surplus?
Yes to both.

A decade ago, we bought the cheapest house in a town with an awesome school district. Since then, prices have inflated. We were lucky.

In that decade our health declined, Long Covid took me out of the workforce. It's a luxury now to have even a few dollars that I don't have to spend on groceries. We're fortunate that we bought the cheapest house, instead of a nice house, or we'd be homeless.
They may not block them by "default" but when all the onion browsers automatically have a high threat score for not running cloudflare's invasive javascript it's the same thing. Especially combined with the high "threat score" they attribute to almost all out node IPs. I don't even use tor and they still block my browser when I'm trying to read science journal articles because my browser cannot run their bleeding edge features they use in their spying javascript.

And everyone knows it because that's what the lived experience of trying to access cloudflare blocked sites on tor browser (or any other browser that's not made by a megacorp). It doesn't matter what cloudflare's intentionally ambiguous and probably disingenuous wording might try to imply. The only people who think otherwise have never actually tried using tor to surf the web.
> If the relative humidity is above 65% and the temperature is above 85 degrees Fahrenheit, that sets the conditions for mold growth

May be this is a typo and they meant below 85? I know black mold grows at around 60F and likely lower temperatures too.
> 1) Copyrights can only be owned by natural persons and can not be transferred. They can be licensed, but the physical creator of a work always owns the copyright. Disney can't own copyright, only it's artists and animators. They have to negotiate a license to distribute with everyone.

This is, as I understand your idea, the situation that actually exists in Germany in the Urheberrecht. Here, two concepts exists:

- Urheberschaft (authorship): the property of being the author and be attributed as such; cannot be sold.

- Nutzungsrechte (usage rights): these can be sold
I trained all my new team members remotely by:

1. Checking in on them often to make sure they weren't blocked.

2. Screensharing or pair programming (one on one) to teach them necessary skills.

3. Making it 100% clear that they could reach out to me or another senior team member at any time for help - if we're too busy we'll just respond later.

Works quite well as long as your senior engineers aren't overworked and can actually dedicate some time to bringing juniors up to speed.
Computer based records could be controlled via CVS (Concurrent Versions System) if available from the OS.
Under deadline scheduling, every pending job _eventually_ has highest priority as time elapses. (Assuming new jobs can’t arrive with deadlines in the past.) Every job is eventually serviced.

The “pain” experienced in an overload situations is spread among all late jobs. Contrast this with fixed-priority scheduling, where lowest priority jobs will be starved completely, until the overload is resolved.
There is a lot happening with multimodal models and robotics right now. PaLM-E is similar to GPT-4V in that its a LLM that has been trained on additional visual and robotics "sense" data.

https://blog.research.google/2023/03/palm-e-embodied-multimo...
The country I live in has strong consumer protection laws. Banks deal with it by judging risks: That which is too risky is what they won't offer.

My bank does not offer Western Union transfers, for example, because there's been too much fraud. And does not accept root-platform devices as 2FA "something you have" factors.

Liberty or consumer protection? Your choice, really.
> It's not fair for you to suggest that it's my fault this is a mess, 15 years on.

All I did was ask specific questions. Specifically, who are you griping about?

It's also not fair to expect ISO, a documentation and consensus building body, to act like an engineering org under contract to us. That's not what it does, and it really couldn't do that if it wanted to.

Reporting, clarifying, and otherwise contributing issues is helpful of course. But bottom line is that someone needs to implement fixes.

I just want to make sure we're all aren't just sitting in a big room yelling about why someone isn't just fixing to things for us. Most of the time it seems like we're not far off from that.

We should be holding our vendors more accountable of course. But also our leadership (like CTO offices) that seem fine using all the open source tech for free without contributing back in any form.

But ISO? I think it is being too complicated for volunteer compiler contributions to keep up with, but I don't think putting more language features in C++ is going to help that at all.

Maybe we call C++ dysfunctional and move on to something else, but I don't see how the same problems don't just show up there in another ten years. It's hard to get around lack of funding. Syntax isn't going to fix funding issues. Consolidation could, but we seem to be going the other direction, at least in the short term.
> Modules adoption would be severely stunted if everyone had to adjust all calling code in order to convert a library to use modules.

"We'd like this new feature to be good, but we have to cripple it for adoption/back-compatibility reasons". This is the entire story of C++, sadly :(

Modules being orthogonal to namespaces means:

1. Bad Surprise for people first using modules, leading to incomprehension as this is different from every other language

2. Occasional Bad Surprises for people using modules even after the first time, as people will export stuff outside of namespaces/in the wrong namespace from time to time

3. Some code using the convention that the namespaces in modules follow the module "hierarchy" (which is also entirely a conventional concept because `.` is not treated as a special character) and some code not following that convention, either because it was hastily ported to modules or because the authors elected not to care for this particular convention. Now enjoy not knowing that when importing a module from a third-party library.

Unfortunately the orthogonality to namespaces, in the name of "facilitating migration", cripples the language forever and actually reduces the motivation for migrating to modules (because it doesn't remove footguns). Doesn't help that the whole module feature is designed in this spirit. I'm lucky enough to have migrated to greener languages, but I don't think I would find it worth it to migrate to modules if I were still in the position of deciding what C++ features to introduce in my team.

> Ideally one could find/replace includes with analogous imports, a bit at a time.

Make a tool like `cargo --fix`, or something. Ah no, we can't, because of headers (and more generally the preprocessor), ironically :(
Already done that.
On thing that I've read about is ear based EEG. Easier simpler contact for things like sleep studies. They don't list that as supported, but it is an example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ear-EEG
My 20/40MHz had an LED display. When I opened the case, I found the display had jumpers to make every combination of leds possible, even non numeric. A bag of jumpers was taped next to it. I'd put HI/LO on it, or 01/99, or make the turbo 20Mhz and the slow mode 40.
https://geti2p.net
No it's like saying biannual can mean twice a year or once every two years.

Dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. Language evolves.
100%. Wonder how soon this will become automated though? Since ASL seems like an image recognition task, and AI models are getting pretty good at that.
> Haven't found the need yet for any frameworks

This is a static page, CSS framework shine for dynamic page where style needs to change beaded on state.
Volume mixer.
This site is unreadable with the pop up ads.
I visited the site. It has pages of facts about bands and artists.. you might even call them profiles...

It also has a forum with a community. I really this as you being frustrated by the competition rather than them doing something nefarious.
The optical communication experiment is a very exciting piggyback, but it's disappointing that the press release is 95% background on the Psyche missing and only a tiny blurb about that experiment. Where are the receivers? How far away do they expect to be able to pick up communication? How do they get the angle of the laser to the incredible accuracy they need?
James Baldwin vs. William F Buckley: A legendary debate from 1965 [video]
Underfunded public education effort versus the entirety of the madhouse attention economy driven by quadrillions upon quadrillions of calculations, experts in psychology, and decades of statistical data and honed strategies? Rewarding teenage kids with a global attention lottery driven by clicks, to the point where some stupidly huge fraction of young kids aspire to be...influencers? Seems like a fair fight.

We lose the war for every single medium to advertisers. Because money. And every single time we tell ourselves it's the ad dollars that support these great free services that are the next great threshold in humanity's access to information and will usher in a utopia of free communication and thinking.

Same thing happens every time. We learn nothing. Those dollars are too sweet.
Perhaps you can choose similar weapons. For example, one day cutting weapons: knife (from the kitchen?), and axe, an ice pick or a scalpel (like Jack). Another day 4 poisons: rat poison, cyanide, mushrooms or snake poison
care to explain your thinking on this one?
Document.all Willful Violation
There can be a real ethical dilemma when applying A/B testing in medical setting. Placing someone with an incurable disease in a control group is condemning them to death while in treatment group they might have a chance. On the other hand, without a proper A/B testing methodology the drug efficacy cannot be established. So far no perfect solution to the dilemma has been found.
Thanks for the reply. I was not necessarily arguing for the ancient processes, but for the existence of tradeoffs between the process generations that don't instantly make the older processes obsolete. However, depending on how important having domestic chips is rated, seemingly obsolete processes might still have the advantage of lower setup cost.
I had never heard of G. Branden Robinson before, but his reply to this is extremely thoughtful and well written.
you’re referring to tact or social acceptance

gp is referring to government policing of speech and legally punitive consequences
Also bug fixes. And there are still major headaches around when names are provided both through textual inclusion and import statements.

But integration and tooling is required for any major amount of adoption. IntelliSense has to work. Existing LSPs have to work.
I've seen more people using iPhone accessibility features without "needing" them than I have with people they're supposedly designed for. Having the rear light flash for notifications was a huge one a couple of years back, which I mostly saw out in nightclubs. (perfect application, if a bit annoying to get flashed in the face a few times a night.)

People using that floating assistivetouch button when they have a damaged screen/home button was huge too.

I think most non-technical people either don't know they're there or view them as hidden extra features. (which they kinda are, for things like mouse support)
I was more using "doesn't know" in the sense of has no evidence or training material suggesting the thing it said is true. I'm not associating actual brain functions to the current generation of AI.
2nd law of infodynamics and its implications for simulated universe hypothesis
It actually sucks. The worst video platform in Russia.
VK Video and Dzen are way better.
As opposed to statements of absolutism? Sounds like you're one of them!
Could you please clarify what you are accusing me of? I have been a reader of Hacker News for years. This is the first time I'm posting because it's the first time I have something interesting to share. What's wrong with this?
They definitely have the money for doing it, they just don’t want to. They rather completely screw over the developers who have little choice in what App Store to target. They should not be allowed to gatekeep like this without properly paying to support developers.
Building a TUI for ChatGPT with Textual
> Disadvantages of statement-based replication

Statement-based replication is deprecated: https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/replication-options-...

> Stored functions execute with the same NOW() value as the calling statement. However, this is not true of stored procedures.

That's from the "disadvantages of statement-based replication" section, not the row-based replication section. So to recap, the disadvantages you've quoted from the manual are specific to statement-based replication, which is deprecated.

> Don't forget about the pitfalls of replicating CREATE USER and ALTER USER in MySQL

As mentioned in that Percona blog post, all you need to do is add IF EXISTS / IF NOT EXISTS to your SQL and it solves the problem. Or in MariaDB, you also have the option of CREATE OR REPLACE syntax.

Sure, it's a minor footgun for newbies, but not exactly a horrendous problem.
I think the question was "do you have similar ways of circumventing 'election silence'" :) ?
Yes, postman was the last of them I was cheated. No more. Except Jetbrains products.
They can even take a page out of paramount+'s book by charging extra for an "ad-free" tier that merely shows you less ads than the other tiers.
You are spot on in your second para. A lot of the "cool" advanced settings on iOS are hidden inside accessibility settings.
IME some companies just aren't able to pull off remote without major productivity loss. The culture just isn't set up for it. I don't think it's impossible to "fix" these companies, but it is quite difficult and would probably require replacing the entire leadership team. Many boards are understandably opposed to that and go with "let's just go back to how things were" instead.
I have a question that maybe someone here knows. It has been noted multiple times in the comments here that at this point, one should just use tokio as the async runtime. (From my limited experience, I agree)

The async Rust book [0] says this about runtimes:

> Importantly, executors, tasks, reactors, combinators, and low-level I/O futures and traits are not yet provided in the standard library. In the meantime, community-provided async ecosystems fill in these gaps.

Notably, it says "not yet". My question is if someone knows if there are actual plans to incorporate any (existing) async runtime, and if so, whether there is a timeline? Also, is tokio in the talks to be the runtime, or is this still open?

[0]: https://rust-lang.github.io/async-book/08_ecosystem/00_chapt...
> Isn’t it nice to see people deduct in real time why many sites use relative timestamps?

But that is throwing out the baby with the bath water. The existence of multiple locally used data formats is no reason replace information with this oversimplified nonsense. Browser can and used to provide the locale with every request. That is enough information to format a data such that it is readable to the user.
I am not sure (and too lazy to check) if the issue is with groff vs mandoc (the typesetters) or instead with tmac.an aka -man vs tmac.doc aka -mdoc (the macro packages, one presentational, the other semantic) — note the confusingly similar names. I understand the BSDs have been switching their pages to -mdoc for the most part, but on a typical Linux system you’ll find both used quite a lot (and even for GNU software, most though not all will not have come from the GNU project, what with that project being actively hostile to man pages).
I thought it was just my mobile browser (Chrome on Android) but every paragraph was followed by the same ad.
Maybe this is a stupid question but what are the use cases for this where text and subtitles don't work?
Not OP but my read is that at some point we just tax the fuck out of the tech gods who “win”, creating UBI for the rest
OpenC910 and XuanTie C910 are different cores. The latter has RVV 0.7.1 for example while the open-source version does not have it.
I'm actually using the remarkable for this kind of functionality. Some article i want to read later --> Share with remarkable, you do need the remarkable cloud service for that work seamless though.

Maybe one could use this to circumvent the paid cloud service.
25k for a set of tires driving pretty moderately. I got better life out of corvettes tires and that included track/autox time
Problem is, people are evolved apes that have inherent psychological weaknesses that just don't disappear because of 'responsibility' or whatever. If you feed a brain meth, it'll get hooked. It goes so much deeper than "personal responsibility", especially when you are embedded in a social cesspool of medium illiteracy that enforces normalized thinking that you'll be expected to yield to or be left out.
"the average used-car loan at origination has reached 123 percent of the vehicle’s market value"
No, it's not the same. You only get the "penalty" if you actually manage to solve the problem in the end. It's a significant difference.
I didn't pull the trigger, and thus didn't pay a tax person to tell me for sure, but I am fairly certain of the rebate.

For the federal credit, only some EVs qualify, and the list changes each year. You also have to have a tax burden within a certain range. The credit for used vehicles has different requirements, too. Starting next year, you get the rebate back as cash from the dealership at the time of purchase, which is nice.

My state offers a 5k credit for new EVs costing under 80k with no other strings. Next year they're adding 2500 more if the cost is under 35k.

> So for me the comparison would be Bolt at full $32K vs. a $6-$8K Civic since I like to buy cheaper used cars.

A no-brainer at those values, for sure! The last vehicle I bought was a 6 year old Focus for $7k. Because my family has changed since then, I was looking at used cars in the 15k range instead of under 10k

I would never have even considered a new car if the tax credit hadn't pulled the Bolt down into a range that made it competitive. All of the other EVs either cost too much initially, or didn't qualify for the credit. Also a lot of them had really small driving distances on one charge, which surprised me.

Another thing I found surprising, was that some people purportedly purchase a new EV each year for the tax credit. They drive it for a year, and sell it next year at a small profit. Market liquidity not totally accounting for the credit value (varies by model). I am far too risk-averse to do such a thing.
The XuanTie C910 is a shockingly slow RISC-V CPU core, don't expect miracles out of this one... (performs _far_ below the advertised A72-class numbers in practice)
There exist non-breaking spaces for that exact reason.
Countries really need to internalize their it needs and infrastructure. It is good for the local economy and is an investment in its people .

I definitely tend to agree with the outsourcing piece. I would guess that probably has more impact than a recession.
"B...b...b.but the bad guys might use it."

We would never have had PCs with the attitude seen in this thread.
How does this relate to the GP comment?
Yeah when your Rails monolith's image is several GiBs, uses roughly the same amount of memory, and takes almost a minute to cold start, autoscaling has a lot of inertia and gets pretty expensive.
If the GNU project had a marketing team, they should adopt the slogan "Emacs: There's a mode for that."

I'd also recommend "Guile goes with everything" for another GNU product.
I agree that the compact API overview is a good thing to have, but I loathe that C forces the user to write it by hand, while modern languages just generate it from the documentation comments of the source.

See: `cargo doc` that generates nice HTML documentation.
See also language servers that provide completion using the same documentation comments.

Meanwhile headers, on top of the forced duplication of signatures between header and implementation, and the associated cost, is also implemented on terms of the preprocessor and textual inclusion. This compilation model makes code analysis much harder than necessary, because it becomes hard to know which piece of the preprocessed compile unit comes from which header.

This makes it hard to implement e.g. "remove unnecessary import" or "import symbol automatically" functionalities that are the bread and butter of module-based languages. Also impacts automatic refactoring negatively
Forget forced migration. I'm pretty sure I bought a few of those just because I couldn't remember my credentials.
If a company is interacting with the citizens of a country, making their service available in said country, shouldn’t they follow the laws of that country? I don’t see why internet companies should be treated differently.
Yes, thanks. Now I get it.

His big non-rant point is that the EU has failed to generate significant "cloud capital". There's no dominant European alternative to Meta/Facebook/Instagram or Google. The main competition seems to be TikTok. Amazon, though, does not dominate the online market for stuff in the EU as it does in the US.[1] Most of the EU competitors to Amazon are single-country, apparently.

[1] https://sifted.eu/articles/amazon-europe-ecommerce-competito...
Zero BS here on Brave for Android.
The argument I've heard from some US-Americans supporting the practice is that it's not the same election - i.e. you aren't electing Joe Biden, you are electing members of the electoral college for state XXX.
Same here. One company did use a handful of GATT characteristics, but some of them still served a dozen different purposes.
I wasn't permitted to have a computer until I'd passed my 'O' levels, so instead typed out my code on a clonky 1960's office typewriter in the evenings and weekends. I did have rudimentary syntax highlighting because it used a black/red ribbon :)