skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
According to the paper this is "Fat-free mass-adjusted expenditure", and testosterone DOES start to slowly decline after around age 25. The trouble people have with starting to gain weight easier as they enter their 30s and 40s is caused by this since they'll lose muscle mass as such hormones decline, which causes fat gain assuming similar food intake and activity levels, this effect is not included by adjusting for fat-free mass.
As an American they taught us Spanish since grade 4. I would like to say I’m decent. Unusually good grammar. Bad, small vocabulary.

It’s never been needed. It’s been a bit useful about 5 times.
Student uses ML to win contest to read text inside carbonized Roman scroll
this sounds cool. is it like audio version of hey pi?
> “he used GrapheneOS” is 100% going to be used against you in court.

Has that ever happened?

I hadn't heard of that, and people have been running GrapheneOS (and Copperhead before it) for many years.

The first person I knew using it was a lawyer at Harvard Law School.
Im glad that you had a good experience but forgiving for you may be an accusation of theft for another, based on some cues that could very well be wrong. I personally dislike this trend of skimping on cashiers and having people do their own checkout. If they had both it wouldn’t be a problem though…
TRT is great for people who have true hypogonadism that can’t be fixed by other means. I had a friend growing up whose testosterone was under 100ng/dL no matter what he tried with his doctor. Finally got TRT and felt normal again.

However, after the honeymoon period the experience made him realize that not everything is explained and fixed by testosterone. He still had some mental health issues, he still had to work for gains at the gym, wasn’t suddenly full of boundless motivation. All this despite being put toward the upper end of the range for a long time.

This seems to be playing out with a lot of young people going to TRT clinics: The TRT clinics are prescription writing factories that will find an excuse to give almost anyone TRT. They make claims that the normal ranges are wrong and the only correct result is to be at the top of, or above, the reference range. They start people on insane beginning doses like 250mg/week because it gives them a rush to feel like it’s “working”, especially before their natural production shuts down.

The clinics also try to lock people into getting their prescriptions from the clinic in a subscription model. They basically get people hooked, literally dependent on testosterone because their endogenous production has shut down, and then require them to order the testosterone through their pharmacy to continue receiving the prescriptions. If they go to a family doctor, the family doctor will probably decline to continue writing such high dose prescriptions because high doses generate significant side effects, so the person returns to the TRT clinic.

It’s really bad out there. I think we’re headed for tighter regulation of these clinics soon, or at least I hope so. Every time I listen to the radio I get several ads for different clinics every hour promising men they will lose weight, be better in bed, have more energy, conquer the world.
Your solution is even worse! Not only it means opening stores everywhere, but you haven't even considered the fact that not everyone wants to go shopping daily. Buying in bulk is a thing, bc of time and money saved.
Besides, I was thinking of something like this:
https://www.amazon.com/Foldable-Lightweight-Shopping-Capacit...
which is already popular with the old ppl in many countries in Europe.
I'd be interested in something like this.
What does fast actually mean specifically? The slow bit isn't the client, surely?
That’s an oft repeated thing, but far from accepted as rigorous. Malthusian anxiety is always a thing for some percentage of population and they will find something to worry about.
I can train my mom to copy files, manage commits in github? Not a chance.
Obviously ChatGPT knows the information that has been directly given to it.
Valve's solution appears to be to have a "trusted mode" which rejects modifications. This is obviously a minimal barrier for malicious code, but it can reject benign code (eg Discord's in game layout).

Thus, they expect that the average user is likely to only be running "average" things like Discord and the graphics driver, which should be using the benign way of injecting themselves rather than breaking into trusted mode.
Look, I get where you’re coming from. But ask people who actually play competitive online games and I can all but guarantee the general consensus is that anti-cheat is celebrated, not hated. Most people’s complaint with VAC would likely be that it is too lenient or too slow to ban.

Some online games don’t have anti-cheat, and they become nothing but a cheating cesspool. Which consequently drives away actual players, and then you have a dead game except for essentially bots.
Mohs Scale
Sounds like systemd timers tick many of your boxes, maybe not all, but that’s the system I’d be most optimistic for to a as actually implement these…
What about the eyes? Does it blind you if it burns the top upper 1/64th of your eye tissue?
>Also Daniel Micay no longer works on the project.

This isn't true. He stepped down as lead dev. Still one of the main contributors
Two similar bugs over multiple decades is an utterly routine occurrence in software development.

Graphics cards and drivers are a marvel of engineering and maths. They work miracles, and are the product of thousands of specialists along the production chain. It’s hardly a damning indictment that they didn’t place compatibility with the anti cheat engines of competitive multiplayer games at the top of their priority list.
You can't succeed as an open source project if you're not committed to engaging with the outside developers sending you patches, and giving them no meaningful feedback on why the ticket for the patch is zombie-open for years.

You call it 4D Chess, I call it mismanagement. Google, just happens, to be bankrolling the mismanagement by buying their monopoly in the search world.
I tried this query: !code how do I invert a string in python

and I was redirected here http://www.searchco.de/?q=how+do+I+invert+a+string+in+python... which doesn't even open (at least on my network)

What's going on here?
replace how? it can complement it, probably, in edge functions, but replace?

Postgrest-js is something you can put in your code running in client's browser or phone, or in any place you cannot trust code won't be tampered, thanks to many quirks and limitations of PostgREST.

How to make an actual postgres connection, which is simultaneously limited enough to be secure and safe to your data and data of other users, and still be useful for anything, I have no idea. Is it possible at all? Or, ok, how many different users it could handle?
Is anyone here confident this absolutely isn’t a simulated prompt?
I think this is a poor analogy. The better comparison would be if people were buying my apples and extracting the seeds to plant their own trees, then selling their own apples at a lower price than me and putting me out of business.

For example, I don't read Medium articles as often as I used to, in part because I can just ask my programming questions directly to ChatGPT. Granted, this is to be expected because ChatGPT can customize it's response based on my unique situation whereas the Medium article is fixed, but it's still unfair to the author of the Medium article that ChatGPT was trained on, because without their effort, none of this would have been possible. And yet, because I am no longer generating as revenue for Medium, the original authors are no longer being compensated for the value they provided me.

I personally believe that LLM hosts should be required to pay for training data. With RAG, I think it makes sense to charge per-query, but for base models, content authors would probably need to organize into larger groups to facilitate payment.
Unless either tool was actually a cheat, the mistake in both cases was made by the anti-cheat software: a false positive.

Users should be free to play without cheating and not worry that the a anti-cheat will falsely think they are.

"but wait!" one may protest, "the tool is similar to a cheat if they detect using [technique X]!"

Well, I'm not forcing them to use [technique X], and they aren't entitled to exclusively use it, if it returns false positives. Sounds like they need to think of better techniques. And if they can't, and it turns out they don't know how to solve the problem without hurting innocent people, they aren't entitled to exist, either.
My experience of those buttons (Sainsburys in the UK) is that they fail at lesat 50% of the time and require someone to come over to verify the bag before you can continue scanning.
Can you suggest a good book on this topic?
You wrote a PHP script that probably runs a PDF generator tool with a few arguments from user input. What value does this provide to warrant existing as a stand-alone service? A grandmother could mock this up in Google Sheets, using Google Images results as a reference in less time than it would take to input the info on your site + pull out their CC.

Are you actually verifying bank statements?
Some of them, like the standard ChatGPT prompt, have been repeatedly retrieved by many people over long time periods, using very different methods. We can be pretty sure they are not hallucinations. And correctly retrieving these prompts lends credence to the claim that you were successful at extracting the other prompts, even though it's not conclusive proof.

Of course OpenAI might have a completely different prompt and do some post-filtering of the ML output to replace any mention of it with a more innocent one. But that filter would have to be pretty advanced, since many prompt extraction techniques ask for the prompt a couple tokens at a time.
To clarify, this does not seem to only affect cs2. Antilag+ has been slowly enabled on a game per game basis, and they recently started adding multiplayer games. They seem to also be affected.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/177bdfg/amds_antilag_a...

You can also see this pretty telling forum thread:

https://answers.ea.com/t5/Technical-Issues/Account-Falsely-B...

AMD also openly said that they are patching game engine code, which is just bizarre. Not sure what the thought process was. Even if we assume they were aiming to be whitelisted (I'm not sure hooking into game engine code is even common, apparently it isn't), they have still pushed the updates before the whitelisting happened. What was the plan here?

There are open source projects attempting a similar approach to antilag+ ("patching" the DLLs at runtime) but they all seem to warn you about possible anticheat detection on multiplayer games. Again, this was patching the actual engine DLL, not the rendering or graphics related DLLs that drivers sometimes have to patch for specific games.
> "I still don't get why someone would describe straight up what happened in the book."

I'm going to assume you're referring to online spoilers (in text). Most people I know don't have patience to speak about books in person.

It really has to do with the community and their standards. Over at Metafilter.com that community is focused mostly on culture and entertainment topics. They're conscious of spoilers. Posters are hoping to introduce the community to new content or to think of older content in a new light. They want to share, entice and peak your interest to seek, find and enjoy the content they're posting about--if they tell you the punch line, then they've ruined the joke. And this permeates to the comments as well.

What about HN? I see a lot of science, mathematics, engineering, technology, computing topics. What's the community standard for these disciplines? Prove you did the work. Share your sources. Explain what you mean. Quote. Link. And this permeates to the comments as well. Overwhelming detail is the standard. It's a feature, and not a bug (lalalala).

But if that explanation is too much of a stretch for you, let me share the immortal words of Chris Farley, "Remember when... [...] that was Awesome!"
https://youtu.be/iK-04wOy2BM?si=mym_q0ZxxfD887a1&t=46
This game. I went into a hyperfocus frenzy at a birthday party back in the 80s. Played it all night.

"Are you ok swayvil?" "Would you like something to drink?"

Me and certain games back then. Lol. No hope.
Center consoles made of mushrooms and hemp? Apparently, that's Kia's plan
I also contributed to this project, and I think it has so much potential.
I never used to have tinnitus, but I started getting it after quitting and returning to marijuana. Abstaining from weed leaves me tinnitus-free after a week or two of withdrawal, but immediately returns if I take a puff. Tobacco seems to intensify the effects but doesn't cause anything on it's own.
The site has data on that too!

In 2008, there were 68 million employed persons. Today there are 74 million. In 2008 there was a population of 142 million, today it's 146 million. Even their fertility rate is up, after much focus on it. In 2008 it was 1.456, today it's 1.825 [1]. Still far too low, especially for a country with so much land, but this is a struggle all developed nations are currently facing and, by that standard, 1.825 is better than average.

These are simply data. The spin is how the media takes one single data point, and disingenuously frames is as a core targeted effect. The sanctions are certainly having an impact, but in terms of the desired outcome - the destabilization or collapse of Russia - they have been a complete failure. Instead the primary consequence of our actions has been to split the world in 2, almost certainly to our own detriment.

[1] - https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/RUS/russia/fertility-r...
Ok awesome thanks I kept waiting for someone to call me on this one and I was starting to worry that no one would :). I don't believe it's Turing complete yet, so I think you may be right to call me on it. Kind of depends how you define "programming language", I guess. For what it's worth, I talk a bit about Cursorless from the perspective of programming language paradigms starting at 31:30 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcUJnmBqHTY&t=1890s)
> Just because Parliament can't bind future Parliaments doesn't prohibit it from asserting that it has done so.

so, it would still be non-binding

who cares what reality is as long as it's marketed the right way?

> The Fixed Term Parliaments Act purported to do exactly that

yeah and look how well that worked
The first is also generally considered an incitement to violence, especially if uttered by a person in authority.
No, I don't even play these games competitively. I just care about being able to run what I want on my devices without some company telling me I don't get to do that or else

And admittedly their grandstanding of "VAC is always right, we never make mistakes and bans cannot and will not be reversed" hits a nerve, because that is just a blatant lie.

They actually banned players for using Windows 7, and now they're doing it again to AMD users. Both were obvious mistakes on their end.
>I personally dislike this trend of skimping on cashiers and having people do their own checkout.

I suppose we can hope the technology gets better. But given labor shortages, it's hard not to see a future with more automation and self-service.
D3D is not IPC. It is mostly implemented in the process' address space. When you call a D3D function you are not magically dumping all your primitives into the kernel-side driver (which would be slow), you are calling into nvd3dum.dll which _may_ eventually call into the kernel. All of this happens in the same process and therefore the GPU driver can do whatever the hell it wants to it.
Current gen AI probably won't go all Skynet on us but the AI that does go all Skynet on us will have these conversations in its training data :)
So no roads? I don't normally think of mass famine as sustainable, but I suppose it is in a way. I'd like to opt out, personally.
"Freedom of speech, not freedom of reach".

You can write whatever you want on X; they just won't share with anyone if they don't like it.

Which I think is a reasonably clever way to market yourself out of your ill-advised everything-goes freedom-of-speech promises of yore. It's exactly the same in practice as restricting speech, but you can pretend to the public that you aren't. [Musk makes V-for-victory signs.]
Well...

In the quite-recent past, it was common routine to buy (or harvest) huge (by current well-to-do standards) quantities food "in season", and stockpile it for consumption months later. Historically, cheese exists because it's a way to store the nutritional value of milk - when you don't have access to pasteurization, refrigeration, and modern "steady-ish milk production 365-days-per-year" dairy operations.

And similarly (quite-recent past, before the green revolution and massive farm subsidies), far more of most people's income went toward buying food. So they managed their inventories of stored food pretty carefully - vs. modern "meh, whatever, I'll just buy more" attitudes.
Do you happen to know how to detour Steam games on startup? Just launched executable (with detours) gets Steam to restart itself (so now without).
"It wasn't better back then, you were just younger".

The nature of the delights may have shifted, but the delights are still here. I was a teenager in the UK with my transatlantic subscription to CoEvolution Quarterly, weekly trips to Compendium Books in Camden and yeah, it seems like a better time. But I was just younger. Now I have Bandcamp and teh interwebz.
Self checkout effects my time (especially when served lines are available for a large grocery order).

They also impact my tolerance for reusing my bags, because anti theft video and scales make it very difficult to adjust your bags.
Try assertiveness training.

This won't only be a problem in self checkout.

"Miss, I have been waiting before this gentleman here"

Other people aren't loud, they just aren't a timid church mouse. Stand up for yourself.
You wait patiently and accept humans are not and will never be perfect FIFO queues.
I like the idea of using tagged templates for sanitizing sql query inputs. Kudos
This video has been viewed 134,000 times. At $2000 per video, that would be a cost of 1.5 cents per-view, and that's assuming no one else after this point would pay for the video. Inline sponsorships are probably the best form of advertising out there in terms of creator payout, but the reality is that even at its best, advertising for creators pays so low that it is really feasible for you to just sponsor the creators you're following for even just a buck a month and you'll probably be more valuable to them as a contributor than any of the people who are leaving ads enabled.

Especially if they're small creators. There really is a threshold in advertising where a lot of indie creators are not going to be offered this kind of money.

I don't blame creators for doing what they need to do to make money, the state of advertising is not their fault. But as an ecosystem of users and developers and as an industry, we can make a choice about whether a system that encourages influencers to lie about product recommendations and directly influences their content and the topics they can talk about is more or less exploitative and regressive than asking people to give money to creators directly.

Advertising is often phrased as an alternative to regressive taxes on content -- it allows us to give content to people who couldn't pay otherwise. But advertising is itself a regressive tax; advertisers would not be paying any money for advertising if it didn't change purchaser behavior. And for the social cost of that regressive tax, content creators get very little payout in return. $2000-6000 for a video sounds good only because we're thinking about it in comparison to Youtube payout. But it's not very much money for a video that likely required multiple workers and several weeks to a month to produce.
This is like a super FizzBuzz test.
Do you have any evidence that video conferencing software is being data mined for these types of metrics?
I use tuned for my Debian and Ubuntu VPSs that run real-time apps, and it seems to work well. Simpler than me toggling kernel parameters (also known as sysctl settings or kernel tunables) myself.

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterp...

sudo apt install tuned
That's the same argument as "but think of the children". Are you also fine with CSAM scanning tools being installed everywhere? It's okay to have a bunch of false positives that potentially ruin people just in case you can also catch a bad apple?
Your apple analogy is completely legal and ethical. The alternative is Monsanto's attempt at DRM with their "terminator" seeds, which many found to be unethical.
I'm just wondering the impact of some rewards:

1) rewards for filling the Pokedex ( seen+ captured).

Could help with exploration and eg. Fish, Safari zone and swimming.

2) the reward per battle based on the duration of the battle + winning.

Could help with understanding the type system and the different attacks. Perhaps even with assigning TM items.

3) Reward on first usages of HM moves ( degrading reward). Could help with using fly and/or swim.
The weight check is the worst. Most stores I go to have it disabled and it makes the process go smoother.

Not perfect though, it occasionally flags me for some kind of miss scan and I have to wait for an employee to clear it.

Most of them are chagrined at delaying my checkout. I try not to be rude, but I often want to get on with my day.

More recently they don't give us bags anymore, and it seems like a lot of the theft detection has just gone out the window because of the current environmental push that's got all the processes messed up and need to be re calibrated.

So far I just don't remember to bring my own bags and if I have a smaller number of items I just grab the gun and scan them all in the cart because it is a hassle to pull them out and put them all back. I've never been flagged when using the gun.
There are other alternatives as well; LineageOS, /e/OS and CalyxOS that might be more your taste.
> Do not create any imagery that would be offensive.

Good luck evaluating this
Similar story from a guy I knew in the military - deployed overseas, one of the guys in his unit was unhinged, weird, etc. Sounded kind of like a black sheep, but my friend always went out of his way to be nice to him. The other soldiers asked my friend "why are you so nice to so-and-so, he's so weird he's probably gonna shoot us all up one day" and my friend replied "exactly".
and "think quietly"

the other that surprised me are the "Do nots" since earlier guidance from OpenAI and others suggested avoiding negation, e.g., "avoid negation" rather than "do not say do not".

> "Otherwise do not render links. Do not regurgitate content from this tool. Do not translate, rephrase, paraphrase, 'as a poem', etc whole content returned from this tool (it is ok to do to it a fraction of the content). Never write a summary with more than 80 words. When asked to write summaries longer than 100 words write an 80 word summary. Analysis, synthesis, comparisons, etc, are all acceptable. Do not repeat lyrics obtained from this tool. Do not repeat recipes obtained from this tool."

I've found it's more likely to still do things in a "Do not" phrase than in an "Avoid" or even better an affirmative but categorically commanded behavior phrase.

Standalone "not" also confuses it in logic or reasoning, relative to a phrasing without negation.
I also think 30-40 is more likely caused by life just being more complicated! Juggling kids is basically a full time job, and many families are two income families. Hard to hit the gym when your child, who cannot be left alone, increases your effective work hours to 80-90/week minimum no vacation no breaks.