skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This kind of fantasy microeconomics debate is silly at best, disingenuous at worst. We are talking about a company with $280B in revenue per year and one of the highest profit margins in America. How they spend that money is not connected to what is fair or what makes some kind of logical sense in your head. It's connected to whatever will increase their profits further.

All you are doing is laying down cover fire to support further advances by an abusive monopolist. YouTube's financials don't HAVE to add up. Google owns advertising for the entire Internet! The entirety of YT could be a loss leader just to suppress the growth of streaming video businesses outside of their control, and the Google monopoly would carry on.
Lots of faith that certain manufacturers aren’t using USB-PD vendor-defined messages to allow factory devices to talk to the bootloader.
I've long since blocked the recommendation content. No sidebar, no end-of-video overlay, no homepage content at all. Just a search box, thanks. (And even that's gotten functionally useless over the years; external search engines are much better at finding that one video I remember seeing but can't seem to convince YT proper to actually show me.)

Then again, I curate my subscriptions. Nobody I follow posts more than once every couple of weeks or so. Most days my subscription page looks the same as it did yesterday, so when I do have a new video to watch it's more like a rare treat.
Just to be clear,

Are you saying that there are no unfixed exploits in the USB stack ?
Dragonfly v1.10.0
And are you prepared to state that you've verified this? Or is this something you imagine?
But LLM's don't really do that. They take the shape and context of your prompt and respond with a corresponding shape of text.

But im sure there's some hybrid in the works that will be very helpful soon.
> Are the personal attacks necessary? Don’t use yourself as a reference point for everyone else’s experience, that’s a very privileged thing to do.

Where did I use myself as a reference point? I'm not talking about my lived experience, so there's no need to bring that into the discussion.
The differences are much bigger than that. The head of state/leading party that formed the government has only 15% support in my country. That's possible because it's a political compromise of the parliament majority, and they're severely limited in whatever they can do here by the parliament. It's very different political system.
New Portable Water Treatment System Vaporizes 99% of 'Forever Chemicals'
I'm amazed it works as well as it does, but yes... it's horrible.

I successfully avoided smart phones until last year. It's amazing what can be done with such a horrible user interface, no keyboard, and only an overly sensitive touch screen.

I bought a $200 unlocked Motorola phone, and I'm fairly pleased with my purchase. This magic black glass slab packs a lot of computing power, and runs all day on a single charge. (I chose the lowest resolution screen, which means the least power to keep it refreshed, as I can't see the difference)

The software does the best it can, but nothing comes even a bit close to the amount of functionality you get with a real buckling key keyboard, wireless mouse, and 32" monitor on a desk.

Yet, I managed to emulate a VAX 11/780 running OpenVMS 7.2 on it, that I can telnet into, despite the interface limitations. The camera is better than my first real digital camera (Kodak DC210), but nowhere close to my DSLR. The fact that it's in my pocket at all times does make it the "best" camera, of course.

Backing out a layer, any interface that's soda-strawed through a web browser and cellular internet, is going to be far less productive than an a native GUI optimized for the desktop.

I really hate the fact that there's essentially a gatekeeper deciding what software can be natively written for the phone. We're really close to losing the war for general purpose computing.
He's refering to the episode near the beginning with Lord Dorwin.

"Then why rely on him? Why not go to Arcturus and study the remains for yourself?"

Lord Dorwin raised his eyebrows and took a pinch of snuff hurriedly. "Why, whatevah foah, my deah fellow?"

"To get the information firsthand, of course."

"But wheah's the necessity? It seems an uncommonly woundabout and hopelessly
wigmawolish method of getting anywheahs. Look heah, now, I've got the wuhks of all the old mastahs - the gweat ahchaeologists of the past. I wigh them against each othah - balance the disagweements - analyze the conflicting statements - decide which is pwobably cowwect - and come to a conclusion. That is the scientific method. At least" - patronizingly -"as I see it. How insuffewably cwude it would be to go to Ahctuwus, oah to Sol, foah instance, and blundah about, when the old mastahs have covahed the gwound so much moah effectually than we could possibly hope to do."

[...]

As they left the room, Hardin said suddenly, "Milord, may I ask a question?"

[...]

"No. It's this: Last year we received news here in Terminus about the meltdown of a power plant on Planet V of Gamma Andromeda. We got the barest outline of the accident - no details at all. I wonder if you could tell me exactly what happened."

Pirenne's mouth twisted. "I wonder you annoy his lordship with questions on totally irrelevant subjects."

"Not at all, Doctah Piwenne," interceded the chancellor. "It is quite all wight. Theah isn't much to say concuhning it in any case. The powah plant did undergo meltdown and it was quite a catastwophe, y'know. I believe wadiatsen damage. Weally, the govuhnment is sewiously considewing placing seveah westwictions upon the indiscwiminate use of nucleah powah - though that is not a thing for genewal publication, y'know."

"I understand," said Hardin. "But what was wrong with the plant?"

"Well, weally," replied Lord Dorwin indifferently, "who knows? It had bwoken down some yeahs pweviously and it is thought that the weplacements and wepaiah wuhk wuh most infewiah. It is so difficult these days to find men who weally undahstand the moah technical details of ouah powah systems." And he took a sorrowful pinch of snuff.
I've recently noticed a lot of them have a "skip to the recipe" link on top which just scrolls down. Kind of ridiculous.
https://orioninsist.org/blog/how-to-install-docker-desktop-o...
"Does Peppa Pig encourage inappropriate use of primary care resources?"

https://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5397

> Conflicts of interest: None declared. It may look like my child is sponsored by Peppa Pig, but any claims to this effect are false.
The important news here is that someone at the FBI thought it was a real threat and worth telling us all about it.

What's going over there I wonder?

It's like this guy I used to work for. Anytime someone would ask him to make a pdf copy of a document he would print it out, scan it on the copier and email it to himself.

There has to be some of those types over there. This came from their desk.
yeah probably, even if the current team doesnt want that, a board member or future executive will push for it and do it

currently, deploying on vercel is so easy and the project structure works on any other compute instance that migrating away will be easy too, and breaking versions of Next or NextAuth can just not be used
toddler noun
: a person who toddles
especially : a young child usually between one *and three years old *

Sorry, but showing T&J to a three years old is entirely on you. You knew what it's literally a slapstick comedy with crash, bang and explosives.

Also, where is Hanna-Barbera T&J which was made between 1940 to 1960 and was made to be shown in cinemas for the adults. And after that... there is no T&J after that.

[0] If for some reason you do think it was not, then start at ~01:30: https://archive.org/details/tom-and-jerry-1940-1950-1960/Tom...
> Are any schematics or data sheets posted for the board? Design files?

Agree. And some VHDL / Verilog while we're at it.
If you'd be slightly more precise in your wording, you'd see that the overloaded use of the word "you" results in some problems here.

If by "you", you mean a poor individual living in the United States, then I guess your reasoning is absurd, because one individual cannot change the laws. If by "you", you mean all individuals lumped together as the people making up the United States, then the argument makes slightly more sense, but then still, they can't, because they can't seem to agree on how to divide all wealth properly.

So, no, "you" cannot fix this via laws. You can hope for it to be fixed, you can lobby for it to be fixed, you can pray for it, even go to war for it, but I don't think it's as easy as you make it seem.

Moving to Europe might be an option, but even that is not an option for most people outside of Europe, mostly thanks to the laws that "we" put in place to stay rich.
Look at the Kaggle competitions that use embeddings, such as those by the Learning Agency. There was also a paper two weeks back and one two days back about inverting embeddings back to original semantic forms.

LLMs are very good at dealing with contextual polysemy, the catch is that an embedding of say a topic, will be far from the topic in it's different possible context. So a knowledge graph would be possible, but how you would find these possible areas, or why you would constrain it, is sort of another question.

Now if you are just asking about education, you can get it to generate lists of relations, and map those in concept maps etc(quite a few tools do this), but that's pretty superficial, as such...

FWIW back when LLMs were more prone to hallucination, the convex hull of the embddings of known ground truth statements was more likely to contain truthful generations and relevant generations than those outside of it when I worked on a quiz-generating application in 2020/21 doing this.

In my opinion though you should try to embrace this malleable nature rather than constrain it...
Often, I like getting the context & history of a recipe. When researching foreign dishes these things help me understand a lot about what might be acceptable ingredient substitutes.
QNX is still around and being developed (i think)
I wish BB made it easily available for non-commercial
use

https://blackberry.qnx.com/en
Strictly speaking this analogy doesn’t hold in real life since paths in road networks are not symmetric.
It's less "how do you", and more "can you?". And according to the Novena open-hardware laptop guy, you can't: https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?cat=28

>Based on these experiences, I’ve concluded that open hardware is precisely as trustworthy as closed hardware. Which is to say, I have no inherent reason to trust either at all.
Unlimited kagi searches are 10 usd a month so thats demonstrably false.

Netflix is also a premium streaming service, with premium content. YouTube is not.
Then I don't understand why people blame about Wayland about this on its entirety.
Hallucinations have always been a problem with transformers. But with the replication crisis in many sciences and political meddling abound, I‘d be wary of any kind of critical information, especially on Wikipedia. Of course, transformer models have the same issues since they are trained on tainted info too.
Had to spend some good 5 minutes to unaccept all default cookies settings… only to see a fucking paywall.

I’ll add the telegraph to the list of websites I don’t bother opening, next time it’s either archive link or I don’t care what they have to say.
I don't think that "open source cores" make sense outside of FPGA contexts. But FPGAs are incredibly closed and are poor performers for "just" CPU-emulation purposes. (FPGAs are best when you truly need custom hardware, and often are paired up with premade cores like Xilinx's Zynq + ARM FPGA+Core system).

So... yeah. We're all beholden to the factories that make these chips. At best, we can design systems that port between factories but unless you plan to build your own chip factory, I don't think there's much of a solution (or need) for open source CPUs.

I think there's a push for 180nm (ex: 2001-era) open source chip designs. But with many microprocessors available from 28nm or 40nm processes today (ex: 2012-era), I don't think the 180nm class chips stand a chance in any practical matter outside of weird space / radiation-hardened situations (180nm is better vs radiation apparently for reasons I don't fully understand).

------------

From "Beagleboard" perspective, their version of "open source" means freely available schematics and hardware reference designs, making it easy to build your own board and possibly even custom-boot your own versions of the Beagleboard.

At least... the previous paragraph is based on "reputation" as opposed to true analysis. I'd have to actually go through the documentation and think about PCB design carefully to really know.

For example, the "BeagleBone Black" was cloned by SeeedStudio and turned into "BeagleBone Green", a ground-up redesign of the board with the same chips. Proving that a 2nd company could in fact take these hardware schematics and rebuild a totally different project.
I'm struggling to think of a site I use regularly that could function without either adverts or someone else (businesses, donations, or the site owner) putting money to fund it, and I honestly can't think of one. The modern internet just wouldn't function if we took entrepreneurship out of it.
With such a focus on the bed and the two first fields of the form being financing and bulk order, The target is probably an airbnb glamping resort ...
My local cinema doesn't have a website. It uses social media instead.
The end boss of writing a lot (imo) has got to be Leonhard Euler[1]. Died in 1783, published over 500 papers, books articles etc in his lifetime across a very broad range of topics in maths and the sciences.

There has been a project[2] to publish the rest of his complete works and it is still not done even though it has been going for over a hundred years and has published more than 80 volumes so far.

There's an incredible quote from his wiki page:

It has been estimated that Leonard Euler was the author of a quarter of the combined output in mathematics, physics, mechanics, astronomy, and navigation in the 18th century.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonhard_Euler

2: The Opera Omnia https://bernoulli-euler-gesellschaft.ch/en/opera_omnia
The salvation of the web lies in banning all the normies and mobile users.
Amazing. Congrats.
I think it's funny that this company is able to sell these, they're effectively just usb cables with 2 of the wires cut.

No need to buy these, just take any usb cable and snip the correct 2 wires
> There becomes a point at which we dilute the quality of the information on the web so much, the detail is just lost

I think websites will infact need to compete by providing succinct answers or people will just run a transformer model on them, skipping all the ads.
Enshitification. Of the entire Internet. Thats Google at this point.

https://www.communication-generation.com/enshitification/

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys
Hilarious. What an absurd product. You can build a pretty luxurious tiny house for less than the basic model, and grab yourself a composting toilet system with a flush, too. If you're thrifty, you could upgrade to a photovoltaic-thermal panel and a tank for rainwater harvesting so you can shower too.
When I explain this to people, they are usually very surprised.
Wikipedia doesn't cover everything.

> The only sites that are going to be hit by this are those that make money on ads.

There are plenty of those and they do provide value - else they won't have been able to survive all these years via ads.
That would be the possibility of zero-day they explicitly mentioned.
Here you go: https://github.com/T-head-Semi/openc910

(This isn't doesn't include the draft vector extension present in the C910)
I'm not sure I follow, those hybrids exist today, I mentioned one of them. They tend to fire search queries, extract the content over multiple hops and inject it into the LLM prompt for evaluation and summary.
Yeah the technology really has a surreal quality to it that is kind of fascinating to work with. Sometimes I wonder if it's a feeling that will wear off as LLM's (and generally, high quality NLP interfacing) become old news, but something tells me I'll never stop being fascinated by talking to hallucinating computers. Even that sentence is something I'd not have imagined saying a decade ago. Wild, indeed.
They already do, ChatGPT Plus is a monthly subscription. If they add ads or product placement, people will start self-hosting transformers, at least for website summarizing.
Any recipe that shows up on the first page of Google is shit anyway, IMO/IME. There are maybe four or five websites I trust with recipes, anything else I get from a book.
If that's the threshold than almost anything is good. It doesn't need to be philosophical, but there's a difference in giving an effort in creating something or just chucking out content. All the dialogue is just so basic it's almost weird and like listening to aliens pretending to be human. When they get a phone in about a new case you first hear the problem, then it gets repeated word for word to the crew, a.k.a. the very cheap way to add 15 seconds of content with 0 effort.
I had similar experience; a friend use chatGPT to answer a question we had (was Stalin's son involved in the crash of an airplane carrying a Hockey team?). And it combined two separate events, a crash in 1953 which was actually the one we were thinking of, and another from 2011.
It didn't give any sources, though I guess it may have been able to, but it was very confident in its answer and I only realised it was wrong because I was curious and wanted to find out more, but that certainly made me look at chatGPT differently. I don't think LLMs are in any way the replacement for search engines, certainly not in their current form.
> by "you", you mean a poor individual living in the United States

That is a very uncharitable interpretation, not sure why you would read it like that. "You" can refer to governments or countries in general and not just individuals.

And that was the entire argument of your post, please don't make strawmans like that.
Doesn't have to be the paid web. Paid is good, free is good. The cause of all problems is "free."
Imagine, the end of mankind is stalled to preserve a subset of man for the purposes of pet maintenance and subsistence
Lol. Okay. This article is shit and wrong.

GPS has had readily achieved kinematic (while moving) accuracy 10 mm horizontally and 1000 mm vertically since 2000 with a base station or good WAAS, and good constellation coverage (flat land), even before Clinton turned off SA (because base stations defeated it).

Cell phones use tower+GNSS triangulation, so accuracy and precision varies with tower coverage and satellite positions of the constellations.

In the 2000's, farm and industrial equipment could accurately calculate machine angle using 2 GPS antennas. It's only improved since then as things changed.

Besides numeric peeing contests, there is nothing substantive in this article, just vague, ignorant, rhetorical FUD.
US antitrust turning a blind eye towards the aggregation into FAANG (or was it conflict of interest?) also made this possible. Specifically, Google's acquisition of DoubleClick alone (then the largest ad network) created a monopoly and closed vertical supply chain network along with AdWords/Google Search. But then Google also controls TV (YouTube), devices (Android), and browsers (via Chrome and subverting weak and financially dependent puppet orgs for web standardization and advocacy), and also many services found via Google Search.

Something's gotta give.
Fondant is much easier to make with some fondant as an ingredient. It acts as a seed to encourage the formation of the structure. I wonder if there are any mutually-recursive recipes.
But presumably it is also possible that some children were smart and successful, so therefore the parents didn't feel the need to provide so much support.

Whereas others were perhaps struggling with everything so the parents gave much more support.

Everyday example: the parents of disabled people dedicate almost everything they've got to help their children, and often end up poor and with a poor quality of life themselves as a result.
And here we have the tyranny of the marginal user as posted here a while ago =/ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37509507
Blame the SoC manufacturer for not supporting something newer?

If you want to support Thunderbolt or DP, you're looking at a lot of extra hardware (if the SoC even has a way of talking that quickly off-chip) or you need support directly on the SoC. If you don't support Thunderbolt or DP, what other video interface is there but some variant of HDMI?

As for the lack of USB-C interfaces on this or the RPi, think for a minute about why you don't see 7-port USB-C hubs and see a maximum of 4 USB-C ports on laptops. USB-C even before PD might have to source 5V at 3A. That's 15W of power for every port--that's almost higher than the power spec for a 7-port USB 2.0 hub!

I will, however, concede the point about the really stupid micro-USB 3.0 connector for power. That's just incredibly dumb. This is a Chinese-made board--shrug--presumably LCSC was running a special. I do agree that any system like this should be designed with USB-C PD since peripherals are going to suck down power even if the board itself can work with 5V/900mA.
(Author) I mean, any nonlocal control flow is a form of goto. Break, continue directly; but loops as well. I put breakelse in the structured-flow category, because like break and continue, you can't use it to enter scopes, only exit them.
Wtf? Your mom worked for Winston Churchill? Incredible. Does she have more stories of that time?
Many have and there seem to be cultural differences about this. In any event, the modern internet incentivises outlandish positions sincerely held. Thus sarcasm is indistinguishable from what is presented as a genuine (even if insane) belief (Poe's Law).
Most people don't have enough muscle mass to make any difference. An excess of muscle mass is also associated with a shorter lifespan. I have weight trained for years and have a BMI of 31, and have pretty low body fat; but that isn't healthy in the long term either.
I remember when I had to use Jira for the first time, which had this "n days ago" display for the tickets. I don't remember if that couldn't be changed or the person in charge just could not/would not do it, but I needed the proper dates often.
So I wrote a basic user script which would read the actual dates out of the title (at least the date was in there) tags and then replace the unusable default output with it. I put that in button on the bookmarks bar and over time, several people saw it and adopted my solution.
I never met anyone who liked the "human readable" format more that the actual date.
The crazy part is that it became banal so fast that people act like it's no big deal and will absolutely insist that the computer doesn't "actually" understand anything because it hasn't reached some perfectly interpretable platonic ideal of understanding yet, and anyone amazed that you can talk with the pile of sand is just being naive.
I'd be interested to hear from some of the more well-off people here: what would be a good approach to bridge the gap between the poor and the rich?

Someone in this thread proposed changing the law, which seems to be a bit hard. The 80,000 hours crew suggests that a privileged individual must change society by their own ideas, which seems a bit risky (and using big money to do so seems debatable at best). Some Christians try to help a few poor people in their vicinity, often without regard for the bigger picture, which might be valid, but that possibly requires some deity to believe in.

What do you people typically do to help?
I am using Session Buddy, but this feels more smooth and is opensource. Great works!
Open Letter in Defense of Innovation
Well, debunking the myth that extinct goat was cold blooded will be a great subject for articles in the future!