skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Completely agree. Currently I can perform a full bootstrap using information stored in my brain (with my partner's brain as backup). Any new "solution to passwords" that doesn't allow that means an instant NO from me. I don't care how much more theoretically secure it is.
How about an open source one?

https://intercoin.org/overview.pdf
It's worth noting that BSON is not equivalent to JSON. All BSON objects are documents. JSON objects can be documents, lists, strings, numbers, null, or booleans. Eg, `null` is valid JSON, as is `"foo"`, but neither can be expressed in BSON.

So if your criterion is 1:1 compatibility with JSON, BSON doesn't get you there. (BSON is awesome, though.)
As a legislator he's directly responsible for the national debt, what do you suggest he do about consumer credit card debt?
Skimming through the site, the magic behind this is that the fan spins at a constant speed, but the pitch of the blades can be modulated at very low frequencies - positively and negatively. I had to look carefully at the .GIF on this page to have the ah-ha moment when it made sense. http://www.rotarywoofer.com/howitworks.htm
Secure Boot with RaspberryPi and TrustZone (2017)
I think the answer to that is made clear by the following passage, which I'll reformat and expand to include your latest desired semantics:

> Indeed, effectively untrue means untrue for all intents and purposes (including even seriously discussing), and both the teapot and the fighting staircase theory are equally:

> - untrue,

> - effectively untrue,

> - practically untrue,

> - something we assume to be untrue,

> - and any other semantic game you wish to play around the word untrue,

> for the same reason as each other. They have an equal amount of evidence of their truth, after all :)

At this point, you seem to be coming up with new ways of wording that the teapot and fighting staircase theories are untrue, so if you come up with more, simply add them to the above 5 item list!

And just to be clear, I'm not claiming anything myself, merely examining and judging the claims of those who lend any credence to the totally unsupported teapot or fighting staircase theories, and pointing out that the results of that examination and judgement don't look good for 'em.
Whether they legally have to tell you or not, it's good practice to assume they will spy on you. </tinfoil_hat>
Lol that's ridiculous. They acknowledged you but are you telling you you have no rights. Wow.

This is why we should pay for services. If someone wants something deleted from my app... I'll delete it. No problem. They pay me a subscription, I don't even want their data. It's a liability if anything.
This is an !important problem to solve.
The first right thing a company is obligated to do is to earn money.

You've agreed to their terms that don't violate the law, why would they forfeit their hard earned cash, even if it's the right thing to do?
While the Go community's dislike of CGO can be a bit unreasonable from time to time (in my humble opinion), the post does say that one couldn't build a CGO version of LAME binding, so turned to the (automated) source transpilation instead. This tells much about the "portability" of C in practice.
OK, thanks for letting me know! It's a bit tricky to upload ArXiv links, I have a sense that not a lot of people will actually click through to read the paper or that some people just won't bother to click an ArXiv link at all, so I think that was my reasoning for sticking the abstract in the comments. but you're right that it's a bit hard to read. thanks!
I will get downvoted but have you used Tailwind CSS ? Makes writing frontend way easier for me now. (still struggle at it but less)
A crypto scam cost a finance boss £300k
Narurally. I think it's widely recognized that social commentary is what distinguishes science fiction (which casts a lens on possible futures extrapolated from our present) from fantasy (escapism, mythology, or hedonism).
But since there isn't really treatment, I don't even know if I'd want to know personally, in advance, if it's not something I can take any steps to prevent.
Can someone who knows more about policy sausage-making than I do, comment on how good/bad this is?

I don't know what to think about California seeming to set an upper limit on privacy policy for the country.

California's revenues seem partly tied to some of the worst invaders of privacy, and presumably Californian legislation gets industry input.

At one point, I naively wondered whether a wealthy and independent-minded state like Texas might lead this (a bit like they have with textbooks). I guess they're pretty tied now, too, and also have a lot of anti-regulation voters.
Merge with other post? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37840532
+1 for that video. I've discovered it accidentally and was blown away. Then I watched the other videos by Marti Group and was continued to be impressed. Unfortunately they don't have many videos on YT (there are not many projects of that size I guess)
I'm sure someone will tell me a bunch of downsides. But I recently did something small on the web, css seems much easier then it remember. I really liked the flex box stuff and the vw and vh size. Idk when they got introduced, I guess it's been a while for me lol
Thank you!

1. You're right, it's kind of confusing. Will fix all input cursors in this month's update.
2. I may make some changes in the overall website look in the big upcoming update although I quite like the font I'm using. Is it difficult to read for you?
3. I don't use font sizes smaller than 12px for important data and less than 10px for some less-important-data (like BETA and NEW badges in the side menu, which are semibold to make them more visible). The only place where 8.4px is used is for the 24H price change percentage for BTC and ETH prices in the header.
That'd be 'ProRes RAW', which I don't think an iPhone can shoot in. Log is still processed video, just graded in a flatter profile so you can do more degrees of adjustments in different dimensions like color and exposure.

RAW footage, can barely be called video. Those files don't even have any White Balance and ISO data baked in, just raw data from the sensor, providing even more amount of control in post production, at the expense of working with extremely large files.
If you're in a city where it's offered in person, the 12 week (3h/week) Dale Carnegie training course. Costs about $2K. Will help the company and you. Adaptable to any role and level. The remote version or multi-day compressed version cannot replace the 12 week version, because most of the benefits are gained in the weeklong interval between classes.
Care to explain your definition of "walled garden"?
From TFA: “The DOJ’s suit comes after the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said that emissions defeat devices would no longer be a top priority for the agency.”

So literally the EPA did the exact opposite of your complaint. Or you meant to say DOJ.
It would be good if Mozilla were to now fix other well-known bugs that have been in Firefox for decades.

First, copying/pasting highlighted webpage text with Ctrl-C/V is unreliable (no text in paste) and copying via the context menu must be used if one wants it to work every time.

Second, selecting text with mouse is awkward and irregular in many webpages. Moreover, whether one selects text from the right or the left makes a difference (it's often much harder to select one way than the other).

Third, it is impossible to select only part of a URL in a webpage and only the full address is selected (and even then just selecting the address from other text is often difficult). One has to paste the full address into a text editor and select the wanted section of the URL from there. Why would one want to do this? Well, the URL may be a long address to a specific page on a website and before or after one visits that page one may want to visit its homepage so copying only the homepage section of the address makes sense.

Mozilla, your text selection capability in Firefox is essentially not fit for purpose.

Forth, entering dialogue into a box like I'm doing here on HN to post this text is always fraut with the risk of losing it before the text is posted. Accidentally refreshing the page often happens before posting and thus the text is lost irretrievably which is damn annoying if one has written a lot of text. Simply, there is no progressive save or UNDO in this situation. Why on earth not? Wordprocessors have had undo for decades so why not Firefox? (If I know the text is more than a sentence or two I edit with an external editor. Mozilla, this is unacceptable and you ought to be ashamed of the fact.)

The fact that Firefox does not have undo or that text selection is broken amounts to primitive and unfinished engineering (especially so after decades of Firefox development), thus one has to speculate what other important code is also so rough and ready and unfinished that we cannot see!

Mozilla, if any of you ever bother to read this then you ought to know how annoying these bugs are. (One has to wonder if you ever bother to use your own product—or perhaps you've never investigated how your users use your product.)

One can understand bugs and limitations in a new product but they all ought to have been polished out after several decades of development. If you want to recapture browser market share then you could start by fixing these annoyances. Moreover, it would be a good PR exercise if you explained why these bugs have been ignored for so long. (Incidentally, there are other issues I've not mentioned here.)

BTW, many of us have complained about these problems for years and we've never received an explanation as to why you've never address them (it's little wonder your market share has dropped).
You can also force it by using extensions like `[[gnu::always_inline]]` or `__forceinline`. I've actually used this technique to generate an auto-vectorizable function whenever it's possible, without any code duplication [1].

[1] https://github.com/lifthrasiir/j40/blob/252e7987d36d50f617f2...
It's not his format.
He just created a go implementation of that format
https://github.com/braheezy/goqoa
By definition, elected representatives are not "responsible for" anything. At best they are merely accountable. Saying they are "responsible for" something is incoherent.
You say that the teapot and the fighting staircase are equally untrue. But you don't say whether they are untrue.

You could hold these two positions simultaneously without there being any contradiction:

* they are both equally untrue.

* they are both true
Meta question, but is there a name for this phenomenon? When someone asks a question to "prove a point" using outlandish analogies (RPG's, nuclear weapons, kamikaze)? I see this frequently in online discussions.
> remember a 9.0 is 10x the intensity of 8.0

10x the ground movement amplitude — 32x the total energy release, though!
As California goes, so goes the nation
I don't appreciate personal insults, please do not do that.
35%, oops.
California's consumer protection feels like EU levels right now. With such a big economy and influence on other states, it feels like they're becoming a singular driving force for policy for (at least) blue states.

e.g. I suspect Skittles won't have a "California recipe" to avoid Red No 3 which will effectively make it national law.

Has the rate with which they're driving consumer protection gone up as a legitimate broader strategy or is it just part of the Newsome might run activity?
Agree with him or disagree with him, I want more Thomas Massies in congress. MIT for his undergrad and masters, EE/ME, start-up founder with a successful exit, drove an electric car well before it was viable, did all the wood-framing in his house by hand by himself after taking a class, took a totaled Tesla and built a homebrew powerbank (before the Tesla powerbank existed) fed by solar panels on his roof. [1]

I came to know him when he was in his first few years in congress and went on a 20 minute tirade about the dual-ec-drbg scandal -- which has conspicuously gone missing from the cspan archives. [2] It was brutal, and it immediately put him on my radar because he clearly understood the nuance of it.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18_yXt1s2yc

[2]: (should be at 3:17:11) https://www.c-span.org/video/?326244-2/us-house-debate-fy-20...
Could someone please confirm or deny Samsung has it better because they included 10 times larger sensors, 20x better zoom, titanium since 2017 and hired BTS for their ads?

Reference: https://youtu.be/dLHJl7mwY7M?si=e0Cm2q4bnn_u14Qf
I think they're measuring "largest" by the number of requests per second.
Love the idea of logging time spent. I do the same. Care to elaborate on what you mean by 'fake work'?
I guess I'm trying to understand how much of an opportunitythere is here, and assuming the existing tunnel boring companies have at least considered this, I guess the most possible gain you could get out of this would be whatever it would cost to pay people to do it manually (otherwise, the pros would out weight the cons, and a company would have done it that way). But I wouldn't have thought it would cost that much to have people do this, so Im left unsure how large the opportunity is here.
The article’s main assertion: “Better metrics reveal that general intelligence is continuous: “More is more,” as opposed to “more is different.””

Incorrect. There is a qualitative difference between instinct and intelligence, and all current models are instinctual rather than intelligent — narrow rather than general.

Instinct utilizes knowledge; intelligence produces knowledge. Instinct is deterministic and brittle; intelligence is creative and fluid.

The critical discontinuity between instinct and intelligence is located at the divide between non-conscious and conscious. Although there are varying degrees between semi-conscious and fully-conscious, there is no continuum from non-conscious to conscious. Qualia is not continuous — it exists (is experienced) or it does not exist.

Intelligence, as we experience it, and as we know it, exists only as a side-effect of the conscious experience of qualia. In truth, intelligence is a side-effect of consciousness, or to be more precise, an exaptation of the modeling of other minds driven by the evolutionary pressure of being socially dependent creatures (mostly mammalian). See “Consciousness and the Social Brain” by Michael Graziano.

Humans aren’t actually all that intelligent at the baseline: we require societies help in becoming educated and learning tools such as writing and arithmetic. It takes hard training to turn our conscious experience into an intelligent experience capable of solving problems. Many, if not most, people never become even somewhat capable of rigorous critical thought, let alone grammar and algebra.

Intelligence is an accident of conscious experience, in that consciousness grants a capacity for creativity of knowledge that does not exist in non-conscious entities. Knowledge has one source: consciousness.

This is why your dog or cat, as dumb as they are, still learn how to get what they want from you, whether a walk or tin of tuna.

Without going down the rabbit-hole of metaphysics, we can definitively state that conscious beings have access to a state of information unavailable to non-conscious entities — that of qualia. Qualia can be thought of as the ultimate data structure — infinitely combinatorial and extensible, in that qualia by their nature beget qualia. It is this inherent creativity that accidentally leads to what we consider general intelligence.

We may not understand the hard problem of consciousness, but there is nothing in our obviously material existence that precludes us from generating artificial consciousness, and thereby producing the environment in which general intelligence can manifest itself.

The concrete metric to train artificial consciousness is simple: maximizing a model’s ability to predict its self and its antagonists, and minimizing a models’s predictability by its antagonists. This metric is a relational-social metric that leads to the creation of a consciousness of self and others, laying the foundation for the engine of knowledge that we call intelligence.
You can turn it off in the system settings now, no more app needed. (It's under mouse > advanced)
>I guess it does for locals but talking as a tourist who has been there for 3 days, using the train is confusing as hell

When I was a tourist here several years ago, I had no trouble at all. I just used Google Maps. It tells you exactly where to go, which platform to stand on, when the train will arrive, which car to sit in for most efficient transfer, etc.

>First, you have to pay your tickets in cash every time (the "IC cards" are not sold anywhere due to a chip shortage)

No one uses cash, except some tourists. The chip shortage thing is a very, very recent problem. All the locals don't have this problem; they have IC cards they've had for years, or they use their phone. According to some other comments here, they do sell special IC cards for tourists at the airports now.

>and the machines do not accept foreign credit cards.

There's a good reason for this. 1) fees, and 2) credit cards are incredibly slow. Japan developed the Felica chips used in IC cards specifically because they needed to be extremely fast to handle the incredible foot traffic going through the fare gates. Using credit cards (even if the processors lifted all the fees) would slow everything down and cause a massive backup.

>you have to go to a ticket counter and pay whatever you owe (again, in cash only)

Well yeah, that's what you get for using old-fashioned paper tickets.

>Lastly, the similarity in station names, such as Nippori Station and Nishi-Nippori Station,

You think it's confusing to have "X Station", and "West X Station"? The US has the exact same thing: in the DC metro system, there's Falls Church East and Falls Church West stations, for instance, or Farragut West vs. Farragut North in downtown DC.
No they don't have to tell you. It is their computer.
I work on Google's authentication team. I have mentioned this elsewhere in the thread.
Honestly this is the biggest reason I haven’t made my dream game yet. I’ve had the idea for years and know I could take it happen if I was dedicated for a good five years or so but I have a demanding job and other interests. A key part of it is also procedural generation. The algorithms for doing so aren’t that bad (a lot of land masses and genetics simulation), but just the thought of tuning the parameters for the algorithms and making a semi-competent AI makes me feel sick. I could spend as long on the fine tuning as I could on the rest of the game!

The scope of the project would be on the ambitious side of a solo project and it’s a game I want in my life so I think it would be bring enjoyment to others if I do it right, but I doubt my ability to stay motivated for that long
I didn't know it could record straight to USB-C storage! That gets rid of a major reason to spend crazy money on a 1TB phone, and it's definitely a game changer for anyone shooting 4K ProRes.
> It appears that there is a sizable audience who will hear that and conclude he's a subject matter super genius and that you're a total idiot.

Many of them the titans of SV no less, Sequoia being chief among them; honestly, I called this imbecile being in jail in mid-late '21 when he announced he was going to start influencing US politics. He was an idiot then and he has proven himself and even greater one with time. Likely mentally ill, as well.

I do want to underscore that this scammer would have NEVER gotten the chance he had were it not for the connections his family has at Stanford, and thus VC, and the litany of connections that followed. This article is a must read [0], as were the testimonies given by gyus like Scarmocci (I'm not going to correct his name), because it all boils down to the fact that he was the child of privilisge and connected to all the power-brokers in SV.

SBF, FTX and Alameda is and will always remain a a Silicon Valley VC backed cluster***, and it must be noted that this has nothing to do with us and everything to do with THEM.

> Silicon Valley could be said to be in the business of reality distortion. Fundraising for startups can be as much about narrative as about economic fundamentals. Most venture capital portfolios are filled with companies that will fail because their model is wrong, their product won’t land, their vision of the future won’t pan out. The high dropout rate means that everyone is in search of the one thing that will reach escape velocity. Everyone is looking for an epochal success—a Steve Jobs, a Jeff Bezos. That creates a degree of hunger—even desperation—that can be exploited by someone who arrives with a great story at the right moment.

0: https://www.wired.com/story/why-silicon-valley-falls-for-fra...
What do you mean saying point in time?

I will definitely be adding more onchain and quite specific data in Q4 this year and Q1 2024.

However, I'm planning to keep the product free and there will be no need to sign up if you don't want to.

Some really specific onchain data and analytics will be free only up to a point (limited number of indicators or coins and so on) and people will be able to pay a monthly fee to get access to data without limitations.

A proprietary API yet is a good idea, but I'm not really a backend guy so I'll need to learn quite a few things before setting that goal.
Good to know an overview of the specifics a bit more, thank you!

Just to ensure that I'm hearing you, this guy, the CEO of Unity, managed to rise to that position, while at the same time, consistently making bad choices and treating his clientele badly, for more than a decade? How does that work? As in, how did he manage to be successful if he was so badly behaved?

Would it be impossible to provide a reference article to get a good overview in detail of the events from his history that you mention? I'm fascinated!

BTW -- I love your username! Hahah so positive and lovely! :)
Julia is designed to seem to win arguments as best I can tell... If you complain about the need to break abstractions and the lack of general purpose application you're accused of not understanding. When you say it slow they say you can inline assembler, and when you say that's dumb why have a high level language then, they then say well you don't have to it is fast as is and everyone else is slow, and it just devolves into circular arguments. Abstractions exist in layers for reasons.
I remember seeing e-ink price tags at Kohls (American department store) as early as 2004-2005.
I can’t find it right now, but the Debian docs explicitly indicate that you shouldn’t do that because the internal format is not stable. It has changed significantly in the past, and the only “supported” way to do it is with the official Debian tools
It won't work on Android with a foreign phone because your phone doesn't have the Felica chip. All Japanese Android phones have this chip, and all Apple phones worldwide have it, so the iPhone users don't have this problem.
The difficult part about Kubernetes for newcomers is that it tackles every problem at once. Large scale best-practices you would previously sweep under the rug are now things you can’t avoid addressing. Centralized logging, secret management, certificate rotation, rbac, liveness probes, rolling deployments, etc. A lot of people complaining about the complexity are doing all those things by hand instead - “just ssh into the server with a shared password, remove old logs and restart it lol”.

It’s great if you actually need all of this and consider those practices essential complexity. If you don’t - it feels like someone is shoving accidental complexity down your throat.

Turning it into a developer problem will not hide all these things or make them more manageable. It means you will reinvent k8s yourself, poorly.
sounds like "masons rats" by neal asher. which got a pretty good adaptation by Netflix.
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt20239370/
Typical Microsoft, way too early. Windows XP Tablet edition. Pocket PC.