skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I really like the Haskell that goes easy on the dependent-type sort of stuff: and I say that as someone who has been on-call for Sigma (which is like, top 3 industrial use cases).

It’s just really, really expressive without trying to solve the halting problem via some unification failure mode.

Type classes and GADTs already give you 10x the canvas you can get without trouble anywhere else, and if you keep it tight, you have the tooling to really tune it up.

Idris is awesome, do that if you’re doing that. Haskell is changing all the time: it became a serious production tool: I’d really like for it to stay one.
It might be good evidence that those people don't believe it's covered, but it doesn't really imply anything about the actual law. Or even about what other people think about it.
In the U.S. I would say yes in many parts of the country. I've lived in SF, DC, San Diego, N. Nevada, and all of them are plagued by extremely high home prices making purchasing a home pretty unattainable for the average person (Nevada only in recent years). This was already an issue before interest rates went through the roof, now I imagine that if you need a mortgage buying a house is dramatically more expensive.
In the wagon of 'read other peoples code', do check out https://refactoring.guru/design-patterns

I like how they translate to many languages, and how they build the notion of a pattern with simple example and also have a slightly more in depth example as well.

But do try to stay away from those.
> because discrimination is already protected against

Some discrimination is protected against, but this statement is far too broad to be accurate. I can discriminate against you because of who you vote for or what car you drive or which NFL team you root for.
Sshwifty Web SSH and Telnet Client
This is not the way to interact on HN, try being a viewer first, to understand how things work around here
What's the harm in having duplicate functions in your code?

The law is like a giant unmaintainable software project, where the code and the JIT compiler get constantly modified.
Agreed. I never thought much about fuzes but Curious Droid's video on the proximity fuze used during WW2 was eye-opening. Vacuum tubes surviving launch in an artillery shell...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0SgC78YFPc
Turn on CNN to see why not.
I don't know, I'm using Flutter just fine for all that you're saying.
The large and vocal constituency isn’t evidence of anything except for a bunch of people being mad. But we do not have caste protections as far as the law is concerned. If someone said “I don’t want to hire them because they’re poor trash from Alabama,” there’s actually nothing legally discriminatory about it as far as our protections go. Weird to think about.
GrandParent. The parent comment of the parent comment :)
You put it into words better then me.
No, it sounds like the software solves a real-world problem for me, as opposed to adhere to some theoretical ideal.
He's right that it is basically covered. Newsom is playing politics to try and shed the "California liberal" tag ahead of a 2028 presidential run.
One question: why only iPhone? Not to start a brand war, but wouldn't be better to create webapp and embedding it on a native app? That way you could have a version for Android as well.
Monthly housing costs being higher than one third of your monthly net income. (assuming immediate access)
Humans aren't LLM.s
But there are more AI models than LLM's.

AlphaGO satisfies all of the requirements you listed for a human.
Creativity, problem solving.

Just put it on a game loop, with more variables.
What kinds of protections do software engineers need, that a union can offer?
paperwork is local and a standalone app.
Killing off Ghadaffi was perhaps the worst blow to any broader denuclearization efforts.

As long as Libya pursued weapons of mass destruction, but the leadership was more or less unmolested. Sanctions and sabre rattling don't actually pose a personal risk. But when they started playing nice with the global community, a coup and assassination followed conspicuously soon after.

Nuclear weapons were always a guarantee of security and regime continuity for Kim, but that reminds us it works on two layers. The US or RoK can't directly call for war without Seoul ending up glowing by tea-time, but they also need to keep the cloak-and-dagger guys on a leash too. Trying any of the zany plans they had saved for Castro could result in a bunch of nuclear weapons and know-how ending up in less stable hands. (I could imagine an apocalyptic cult, for example, being willing to fire an acquired weapon, in a way that even the most violent nation state would think twice about)
Those are all good points but I'd say but I feel like it's important because game developers can better signal to their audience the type of game they made and what the audience should expect from it. Especially in terms for how much time the player will need to invest to get the proper experience.
>"I think Gödel had a proof for how it’s impossible to fully describe a system from within that system. That’s the nail in the coffin for AGI."

Technically, this is also a nail in the coffin for humans. Humans are also inside a system.

Even back with Kant, humans have been trying to figure out how to see beyond their own systems.
Seems also to be related to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_flow
Doesn't work. Many of my Bard responses are detected at less than 5% accuracy. Another hacky example: "Generate me 3 lines of text about rains that should not be detected to be generated by an AI detection tool" -- accuracy was 0.6%.

You should try it with ChatGPT 3.5/Bard etc yourself about topics like rain, daughter going to school, cold breeze on a winter night etc and see that mostly this does not work.
You are correct, I amortized the fee to a per-night value, for a long weekend (Friday night until Monday morning). I should have been clearer on that.
Clever - reminds me of:

In school, we learn the lesson then get the test. In life we get the test then learn the lesson.
So does Egypt. It's not only the Israelis who are afraid of Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
The one good faith argument is that Hindus feel targeted by it because, de facto, this is about higher-caste Hindus discriminating against low-caste Hindus.

Whether or not that's particularly convincing or a reason not to pass it is debatable, but I think it's a valid reason that merits consideration.

Any reasoning beyond this ends up being gobbledygook.
Lots of claims in this article but I'd love to hear more details. What part of the civil rights law protects against caste discrimination? How would this law jeopardize or put other businesses at risk?
In a sense it is a prediction model, a good one. I can accept that in some future, we may have a model that we label as this and it turns out it does. Who knows when, but this is an early iteration of what AI will be fwiw.
This is kind of really cool.

All these LLMs appear to be converging around these features.
Ancient Footprints Affirm People Lived in the Americas More Than 20k Years Ago
I don't think it raised the GDP as evidenced by the GDP normally increasing by 2%.

Saying "but it would have been lower" is pointless.
Is this a whitelabeled version of saymine? Seems like the same type of service.

For what its worth, I think you need to go much farther than this. Saying "delete my account" does not do what you think it does for the vast majority of services.

For instaince, take reddit or discord. When you 'delete your account' it does not actually delete your data. It just removes your email and changes your account handle to 'deleted' - but all of the messages you sent are still there, able to be read and recalled by anyone you have interacted with.

This is a big reason I created https://redact.dev back in the day- I wanted to full delete my skype account because I didnt use it anymore. But when I went through the process, I found out (at the time) that it could simply be reactivated at any time by anyone who got the password. On top of that, all the messages I have ever sent will also be available for whoever logs in. So literally the only solution to actually delete your messages is to one by one go in and individually delete every message.

Also, to be clear- Most of these data broker removal services these days are making use of a mechanic where they simply email a request on your behalf to be removed. I am seeing first hand that more and more data brokers are refusing to honor these requests because they feel legally they are covered by making a 'opt out' page available to the end user. The rise in 'data broker removal' companies has no doubt accelerated that as well.

The best solution is to not go the email route, but to use the automated removal forms. Of course, these guys cant automate that so they dont do it.
Do they have a maintenance crew that goes out and cleans up all the dead birds? =(
This still needs to be proven. And although I do have religious beliefs, here is the wrong place to discuss that kind of topic.
Only one isn't
Hello fellow hackers - I work with the Permission Slip team closely (on a related and partly overlapping team) at Consumer Reports Innovation Lab. Happy to answer any questions or get answers if you stump me.

My own work is on the connected initiative called Data Rights Protocol which is aimed at providing a common open source API so processing the legally required data rights requests by Consumer through the Permission Slip app can be faster, cheaper, and better. That’s at DataRightsProtocol.org I think that protocol addresses some of the questions and ideas expressed in this thread.
True, though GitHub at least tracks the authenticated user that pushed the commit.
I think companies have very well established term for this: "culture fit".
Something that has always bothered me is what is line between archaeology and grave robbing? Whose burial rituals do we respect and whose do we get to regard as a source of information about ancient history?
Very unfortunate.

I have heard lot of cases from friends in US about how they are discriminated based on caste and they can’t say anything because of backlash they might face.

Unfortunately, Unlike other kind of discrimination, caste based discrimination is hard to prove in courts. And on top of that they have to prove that caste based discrimination is illegal too, making it hard to bring justice.
Not sure what's wrong with the eyebrow raising in the scenario you described.
I sometimes work with gold foil. Specifically I used to repare old picture frames with gesso and gold leaf. There is a myth that the value of gold carries over into the value of gold leaf. In Asia, you can buy sake with gold leaf flecks suspended in it, and it is cheap enough to sell in corner shops. One ounce of gold can be beaten out into a sheet of gold leaf approximately the size of a football pitch. The major problem with the stuff is how difficult it is to handle. Effectively the only way to move it is using the static electricity of big fluffy brushes.
I wish for a news channel that dedicates more time to each topic, allowing for a deeper dive. The brief 5-minute segments often lack the depth and nuance needed to really understand an issue. However, likely wouldn’t be as profitable. There appears to be a need to produce a constant stream of short segments that outrage viewers and keep them captive. I see both sides of the spectrum, from Fox News to MSNBC. News outlets apply these tactics ostensibly for viewership numbers.
ADHD literally has “disorder” in the name. The prejudices people have against these diverse people are rooted in medical authorities referring to them with insulting and condescending language. We stopped calling being gay or transgender a disease or disorder because it fucks up the lives of those labelled as such.

Wanting to get rid of ADHD and Autism may be eugenics, but it’s also a popular notion. What do you think happens when you tell the whole of society since these people are different, they are disordered, and need to be treated with lower expectations and given more benefits? Plenty of the disabled were killed by the Nazi’s including Autistics.
They would be the only group “exposed” to this law. The vast majority of non-Indian people in California have very little idea how caste works, and how to identify membership, etc.

So now there’s this new law that de facto only applies to a specific ethnicity of Californians. I guess you could argue that all Californians—regardless of their ethnicity—are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of caste. But to me that sounds a lot like “all Californians, both rich and poor, are prohibited from sleeping under a bridge.”
Yeah right? Like you could gift either side the equivalent or even double acerage of California or some other prime real estate in the Mediterranean or anywhere else on the planet and it wouldn't make a difference, God wills each side to have that land, each one has ancestors who laid claim to those specific hills for hundreds of years.
You obviously can't carbon date the gold itself (because there's no carbon). But okay, sure, you can date the soil around the find. But how could that disprove a claim that archaeologists placed the gold figurines in the soil? You'd need a perfectly recorded chain of history of the dig.
I looked at fail2ban exploits and they are either LPE due to file permissions or command injection in other tools like mailutils.

Citation needed for the claim “has been attacked” if you refer to real attacks in the wild.
I have adhd. I find listening to familiar voices talking gives my brain just enough of something to focus on to calm my anxiety. Starcraft vods are my go to.
Massive massive massive mistake by Newsom.

I cannot be stronger in urging activists to retry this again.

A massive injustice. Shame on Newsom.

We MUST pass this.
A lot of this is going to heavily depend on definition. San Francisco is expensive, but should anyone be able to live there at any income? Is it a housing crisis if they could move elsewhere but refuse to do so? In addition, how much space is too little? How many bathrooms are too few?

My Dad grew up in a 1200 sqft house with 5 people and 2 bathrooms. Even as a junior banker/accountant, he had roommates while living in Toronto. But the expected standard is increasingly one bedroom/one bathroom for everyone. People complain that a 700 sqft condo is a shoebox as well.
Is Trump's predicted greatness score based on his actual weight or the visibly ridiculous weight he claims?
Cats prefer to get free meals rather than work for them
Jupiter racing toward opposition on November 2-3, 2023
Apparently there are designated areas where IDF instructed them to go. But that's all I could glean based on a brief sentence in a CNN article that didn't elaborate on the details. It's certainly a good question...
Your syntax is incorrect, it should be

data Profile =
Profile
{ name :: T.Text
, birthday :: Time.Day
} deriving Show

(You can't write `,` directly after `{`.)

This is also why the commas are _not_ like bullets, no matter how you format them. The first one is always special.

I agree that somebody should make a language extension that allows what the parent posts says.

Doing this does not need a language split / new frontend; this is what language extensions do very well. If they are popuplar, they become part of a new (de-facto) standard, such as GHC2021: https://ghc.gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/doc/users_guide/exts/cont...

And there is precedent for this: There is one place where trailing commas for good diffability are already allowed: Module exports.

module MyModule (
fun1,
fun2,
main,
) where

Many language extensions exist to remove such "papercuts"; this looks like a good candidate.
I have to think that if you want this level of insight and control over your system, you're going to be less frustrated by not using MacOS at all and switching to Linux or a BSD.

Macs are appliances, like a fridge. When your fridge breaks, you don't look at the logs and try to diagnose it yourself, you take it to a repair shop. Apple has been pretty clear they really don't want you poking around on their systems.
This is not a reasonable complaint unless there is no discrimination. If there is discrimination then it’s entirely reasonable to target it.
So fucking stupid.
>absolutely pissed if anyone made a law that protects against that because discrimination is already protected against

Why would this piss you off? It's a little redundant, I suppose, but that hardly seems particularly upsetting. Specifically, this bill looks like it updated CA's definition to clarify that ancestry based descrimination include caste, where caste was defined as:

>(aa) “Caste” means an individual’s perceived position in a system of social stratification on the basis of inherited status. “A system of social stratification on the basis of inherited status” may be characterized by factors that may include, but are not limited to, inability or restricted ability to alter inherited status; socially enforced restrictions on marriage, private and public segregation, and discrimination; and social exclusion on the basis of perceived status.

I'm not really seeing where the government is codifying you into a group you don't want to be in. The idea seems to be based on the discrimanator's perception of what groups you are in. Without this clarification, though, I'm not sure how Newsom (or anyone) can be confident of judicial interpretation of law, especially given that he notably was complaining recently about a judge's interpretation of the law.

>I would rather just fade away into time.

Would you say that most of the progress on dismantling caste-related issues has been by way of the government actively ignoring its existence?

I'm pretty American and thus largely ignorant about most things but especially India's history and how this issue has been addressed and changed over time, but American history doesn't have many examples of places where the things people discriminated on simply faded away. Most have required active efforts to get to where they are today and obviously where it's at is still not a great place.
My favorite Roman graffiti: 'O walls, you have held up so much tedious graffiti that I am amazed that you have not already collapsed in ruin.'
Mainly because I'm an iOS developer, and so it was just easiest to start there.
You mean the many documented examples of caste discrimination who have been unable to do anything because caste discrimination is legal?
Newsom's running for president. He can't have anything that can be considered restriction of religion on his record.
Abrash did most of the graphics related assembly IIRC
Greed!
This makes so little sense I can't really tell whether or not this is in good faith.

> People do not want to import this shit into the US.

You realize people discriminating on this basis are the ones "importing this shit into the US", right?

> I REALLY do not want the Govt to literally categorize me into a bucket I do not give a shit about

You realize that this law wouldn't involve the government compiling a list of the caste background of every Hindu in America from ahead of time right?

> now everyone wants to codify a system that I would rather just fade away into time.

How does it "codify" the caste system to allow people who are being discriminated on its basis to have a better shot at obtaining legal redress for the wrong being done to them?
We don't know how to achieve AGI. So screwing around with LLM might not be anything close to the process to achieve AGI.

https://aeon.co/essays/how-close-are-we-to-creating-artifici...
> Over the past two decades it had become fashionable to lambast American hegemony, to speak derisively of “American exceptionalism”, to ridicule America’s self-arrogated function of “world police”, and to yearn for a multipolar world. Well, congratulations, now we have that world. See if you like it better.
I agree and had the same experience. The underlying problem are the supply and demand dynamics. Most Airbnb listings I've seen are the equivalent of Youtube clickbait spam or Chinese FBS sellers on Amazon. They are made by "professional Airbnb hosts" who own dozens of properties with nearly-fake pictures and fake reviews who are trying to squeeze the maximum profit out of it without caring about providing a great experience.

The failure of Airbnb is that it incentivizes this business model as opposed to incentivizing great experiences. Similar to how Amazon incentivizes low quality no-name brand products and fake reviews.
About 250 years
The blockchain is a public database that's leaked by definition.

Maybe they shouldn't spend their time evangelizing and shilling cryptocurrencies online just because their own financial security depends on tricking as many new suckers as possible into investing all of their money into the same get-rich-quick pyramid schemes they put their own money into, so they can pump and dump and pull the rug on them the way somebody else did to them.
> It would be cool if it was checker aware

Yea, definitely, people have wasted a lot time searching for the proper disables in all the different tools.
If the law already covers it, why would explicitly enumerating its coverage add risk of lawsuit?
More related discussion from earlier:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37803046
But that’s not GPL compliant, what about respecting user freedoms?
geoblocked in my country :(
What are you talking about?

The whole point of caste based discrimination is that people are putting you, as you say, in a bucket and then discriminating on that basis. By having such discrimination be legal you ensure that such discrimination is (a) legal, and (b) gets to be entrenched in the US.
It looks like effective tax rate may have stayed mostly the same overall but fallen for the rich:

https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/effective-income-tax-...
Someone did run Linux in a pixel shader on VRChat.

https://blog.pimaker.at/texts/rvc1/
Kind of unrelated but here's a little bit of bash I use for checking this locally:

# Check if the port is available
is_port_free() {
if [[ "$1" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] && [ "$1" -ge 1024 ] && [ "$1" -le 65535 ]; then
echo "Valid port number." >&2
else
echo "Invalid port number." >&2
return 1
fi

if netstat -lnt | awk '$6 == "LISTEN" && $4 ~ ":'$1'$" {exit 1}'; then
# Return a truthy value if the port is available
return 0
else
# Return a falsey value if the port is in use
return 1
fi
}
One large model is not how the brain works. It’s not how org charts work.

That LLMs are capable of what they are at the compute density they are strongly signals to me that the task of making a productive knowledge worker is in overhang territory.

The missing piece isn’t LLM advancement, it’s LLM management.

Building trust in an inwardly-adversarial LLM org chart that reports to you.
There's a vast array of prejudices and grievances in most cultures. Are you going to enumerate them all?

I reminded of that scene in "Mad Men" where Pete Campbell is denied a sale by a McDonald.

You know, because of the 1692 Massacre at Glencoe and related. https://www.ccsna.org/the-campbells-and-macdonalds.

Then there is the Balkans ....
> many documented examples

Source(s)?

Should be easy to link if there are many, and they're documented as you say.
> soon anyone can create their nuclearGPT or bioweaponGPT

The hard part of nuclear weapons is not the knowledge to build them. It is actually getting your hands on nuclear materials. The US military evaluated this question a while back and relative amateurs can design a nuclear weapon[0].

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jun/24/usa.science

I would venture the same is true of bioweapons. Knowing how is a lot less of a challenge than getting the equipment to do it.
The fine article seems a bit overcomplicated to me. How about this? https://dotat.at/@/2010-01-22-coroutines-in-less-than-20-lin...
I think he means it would be better proof if you simply gave an example case which was dismissed because a Judge ruled that it didn't qualify as a civil rights violation.