skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why do you believe that introducing support for passkeys inherently makes the situation worse? If you don't trust them, you're not forced to use them; traditional methods still exist.

In any case, you should have multiple methods. It could be passkeys on multiple devices. It could be TOTP, plus recovery codes in a safe. Passkeys are just one more method.

For the longest time, the gold standard for authenticating people has been tamperproof hardware with keys that cannot be copied. Except iPhones actually have credible biometrics on top of that. Much better than Yubikeys, for example. Of course you always need to have at least one backup device or other method in case your primary device is lost. Now that this is finally making it's way to the “normal people”, it's suddenly a “run away screaming” scenario? Come on.
What makes E-Ink so damn expensive?
Any chance that Irish writing could be re-phoneticized? I tried learning Irish for fun but it was tough because all the letters sounded in a really unexpected way. (I also think that English should be re-phoneticized for what it's worth)
Yep. And it won’t be 100% efficient. The energy to capture and store the co2 is likely greater then the energy you get in hydrogen
I hear you. "Don't engage" is more like an aspirational statement. Though in the last year I've been doing better at it. It may be because I spend more time reading these days than I did a year or two ago.
I need to find one of these services so I can borrow my old phone number for a few minutes to get back into my Google account before it is erased at the end of the year in Google's oncoming purge.
In the case of the DEF it absolutely reduces the lifespan of the engine. A truck engine that could last 500K miles lasts 200K max.

Factor a second or third engine (whole new truck) and the energy and pollution to produce it and DEF looks not as great.

Vehicles and engines that last 25 years are easy to build yet they are rare outside of commerical and military.

The whole argument is disengenuous and proceeds from an unstated a priori desire by government to restrict movement of citizens and markets, rather than as a real requirement for a real benefit.

It's all so tiresome...
>we don’t have infrastructure to charge them at the required scale.

Yeah we do, or to be more precise, we are having no trouble expanding the infrastructure at the same rate people are buying the cars.
I am not sure you need any technology here. You pretty much always have the same cycling and running cadence; so pick a song that's 180bpm (not sure if that's right for running), and there you go. How much effort you exert depends on how long your strides are or what gear you're in, but if you're doing a big climb or something the beat of the music can remind you to keep your cadence at the optimal rate. (That said, do cyclists wear headphones? I don't. It's against the law here, and in general the sound-based situational awareness seems like something you don't want to give up. Make your computer beep at you if your cadence is out of range.)
Twitter and Facebook Media Downloader
Agreed. Haproxy is an absolute wonder compared to similar systems. It all just feels so much cleaner, thought out, and built from the ground up for many different use cases. It very much has a feel that reminds me a lot of the spirit of sqlite.
Great job! How do you find your new identity as a coder - enjoying it enough to pursue as a main line or sticking with the trading and other skills you used here?
TF2 today is mostly unplayable due to bots and weirdness with their player matching game. I put a lot of hours into TF2 and the experience is almost unrecognizable today. CS:GO was, I think, completely outsourced to a third party. They still produce some game-like artifacts but primarily they're the owner and operator of the premier online games store
Ancient, poorly-supported, low-performance OpenGL, yeah. Game devs loved it and that's why there were so many mac ports.
HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Impacting Nginx Products
Could a new law of physics support the idea we're living in a simulation?
At the risk of being somewhat low value, "I am Jack's complete lack of surprise".

I've been looking around in the job market recently. Seen plenty of startups with quite questionable business ideas (I am certainly not a savant, but have been heavily involved in product development and management) with statements like "we are early stage and are valued at $3B". Are you? Are you really? Or rather, you may be valued (and I realize I'm talking private, not public) at that, but are you worth it?

All too often, the answer I come up with is "not really, no".
E-ink has been around for a long time. It's not one of the first panels.
> Hydrogen has a volumetric problem and it just isn't a great fuel for that reason. Even over short distances this is problematic. It just takes up too much space.

Blended wing body designs may
solve the volume problem. It's only intractable if you try to fit the same energy content into a modern airliner that was designed for Jet A.

Weight is the usual suspect in aerospace, and fuel weight significantly favors hydrogen over Jet A (factor of ~2), so a blended wing body design with a much larger internal volume wouldn't even have to have equal aerodynamic efficiency in order to be a suitable replacement.

To be clear, this is not a simple shift and will probably take decades, but it is merely an engineering challenge rather than a fundamental constraint.
I'd agree. Family Search will eventually be understood as the authoritative tree.

One challenge with an authoritative tree is when a distant or non-relative creates a profile, marks it living and then that creator disappears.

A close relative shows up but the profile is locked to the creator. The actual relative has to jump thru hoops to get access to their own family.

With privacy concerns, I don't know how to handle it better. Only that folks might want to avoid creating living profiles except for close relatives.
GP could be referring to treatment being covered under the prior year deductible or max out of pocket.

I have a friend who was hospitalized on December 30th and released on January 2nd. And that's how they hit their max out of pocket two times over the course of 4 days.

It's an awful edge case. If they'd gotten terrible vertigo a couple days earlier or later, it would have cost them half as much.
It's not on the consumer facing site, right? I think everything there is industrial purpose. And the "Actros" line is all tractors.
And if your neighborhood has too few minorities, that's also fishy. Freedom of association, unless you choose wrong.
Hackers make their mark in Israel-Hamas conflict
And what do you do when you go abroad and a web site says "Oh, looks like you are logging in from a new location - please check your SMS for a PIN now" :(
> My experience is that eBay screws up their filters and wayyy overfilters.

This is what happens when the penalties are high and users are motivated to evade keyword filtering.

I doubt it's what eBay wants to do, but if the law is unclear about how filtering must be done then companies will over-filter to stay safe.
Why would that be something that you would want?
Isn't the long charging time an issue? After a quick search, Tesla needs 30 minutes to charge to 80% with superchargers and this is good for 300 kms. Assuming 120 kmh, this means that about every 2.5 hrs, I need to take a 30 min break.

With the old system, I fuel in 2 minutes and I can travel 600 kms on it or approx 6 hrs (assuming 50 litres fuel tank and 7.5 litres per 100 km, and 120 km/h).

(I don't have a car, and I'm open minded about EVs, just honestly wondering)
11,000,000 to ~700? -- I'd call that more than a "small crash".
This is technically true, but only barely. In the US in 2022, renewables were 21.5% and Nuclear was 18.2% of total generated power (yes nuclear should be counted among renewables, oh well). That means nearly half of power generated is green compared to ~1% of hydrogen.
> It’s just that not having ADS into iron sights or vaulting in 2023 game feels archaic.

And thank god. Nobody was asking for thi.s

> The movement is incredibly clunky

Clunky to some is incredibly layered to others. Simple, yet oh so difficult to master, but crisp to input (well... there's some nonsense with the subtick system currently making it less crisp than players want, but that can be overcome). CS has multiple movement based subcommunities for a reason.

(from your original comment)
> Just move on.

Because you enjoy the mechanics of other competitive shooter titles, doesn't mean that everyone does. You seem to think that if everyone played Apex, Warzone or Tarkov they'd suddenly enjoy it, and presumably their PC or some other factor limits them. Newsflash: plenty have played the others and come back to CS.

It's akin to telling a rugby player: hey, why are you still playing rugby? American Football is so much better. Rugby is an archaic game from the 1900s.
Not anymore thanks to signature requirements. You need to be a registered developer and notarize your binaries.
Hi Ian! This sounds like a great opportunity and I am really interested. I applied online, but also wanted to reach out here as well. I would love to learn more about your team at Alation and had some questions about the current projects you are working on.
In what context? Work? friends? Family?

I don’t think it is possible to always be apolitical. I think there are many instances where you need to be aware of what sort of political statement you are making.
Neither of these are still cars-to-trucks companies, they just share a brand.

Mercedes-Benz (cars and light commercial vehicles) spun out its heavy commercial vehicle business in 2021.

Volvo Group (heavy commercial vehicles, marine, industrial) sold its car operation to Ford in 1999, which then sold it to Geely in 2010.

Before them Rolls-Royce (aerospace, gas turbines, marine, nuclear) spun out its car business in 1973.
Meanwhile Toyota announced an amonia engine. I guess we’ll have to live and see what comes out of it.
Atomic Relativism and Holistic Absolutism
You're right, we'll need about 20% more electricity if we replaced all our ICE cars with electric ones. If we stop selling gas cars in 2035 then by about 2045 we'll hit ~99% electric cars.

Are you implying we can't increase our infrastructure by 20% in 20 years?
It's literally in the first Google result for "passkey", the Google documentation itself [1]:

> Important: When you create a passkey, you opt in to a passkey-first, password-less sign-in experience. Create passkeys only on personal devices that you control. Even if you sign out of your Google Account, once you create a passkey on a device, anyone who can unlock the device can sign back into your Google Account with the passkey.

[1] https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/13548313?hl=en
I've been looking into transparent windshield films to reduce glare for this reason.
That is mostly assumed these days. The Israelites were people that
inhabited the Canaanite hinterland. Where they came from and whether
they "came from" somewhere else is unknown and we can only
speculate. Perhaps they were herders who migrated westwards from the
Jordan valley and beyond. They show up in history at around the same
time as the Philistines (1200 BC) whose origins are also unknown.

The early Israelites were polytheists but had some affinity for Yahweh
which was one Canaanite god among many. Why, how and when the
Israelites became monotheists and why Yahweh became their only god is
unknown. My guess (speculation follows) is that the Israelites were
influenced by the Babylonians and Zoroastriansim. Zoroastrians
worshipped fire and Yahweh was the god of fire (and smoke). Perhaps
the many conflicts with other Canaanites caused them to adopt foreign
practices to distinguish themselves from their enemies. Ritual
circumcision perhaps was borrowed from Egypt.

There is not a shred of evidence of an emigration from Egypt and
archaeologists have been searching for it for over 200 years. So why
the Exodus is in the Bible is unknown. At the time these stories were
written down Egypt was a regional super power, so perhaps whoever
wrote it felt that "having been to Egypt" was something to brag about?
Perhaps the story is allegorical?
What are the specs? The linked web page is atrocious and can't find any kind of spec there.
> Windows ships with DirectX, OpenGL and Vulkan support.

Windows ships with DirectX. Your graphics card's software package can add support for other APIs.
Sure, its carbon free, but NOx (NO, NO2, N2O etc) are really terrible greeenhouse gases and one of the main causes of smog. Catalytic convertors are there just to address this and try to mitigate the problem since all fuel contains a small amount of nitrogen compounds. Let's hope they don't replace one GHG with another.
Males can be fairies too :)
Why does this need a NN? What you described is doable with very simple logic.
I'm not too sure we need to worry too much about the additional water vapour becoming a problem. About a third of all sunlight that reaches earth is spent just evaporating water [1].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Earth_Energy_Budget_with_...
I'm glad it exists, but I'm not super comfortable encouraging everybody in my extended family to give all of their information directly to the LDS Church, especially with their history of stuff like proxy baptisms of holocaust victims.

But on the other hand, I was just a minute ago wishing that this sort of service existed publicly as a Wikipedia-like free resource, which is a strict superset of the LDS Church having it, so maybe that's unfair.
Identifying an “AI strategy” seems backwards. What they should be doing is identifying the current problems and goals of the company and reassessing how best to accomplish them given the new capabilities which have surfaced. Perhaps “AI” is the best way. Or maybe simpler ways are better.

I’ve said it before, but as someone to whom “AI” means something more than making API calls to some SAAS, I look forward to the day they hire me at $300/hour to replace their “AI strategy” with something that can be run locally off of a consumer-grade GPU or cheaper.
That's one of the few comments where someone says that Mercurial is better than Git. Interesting to me because I have used Mercurial and I like it, I now do mostly Git because that's what everyone uses. And I kind of prefer Git now because I grew more experienced with it, but really, that's a wash, they are both great and fundamentally very similar.

I had some coworkers who preferred Mercurial, the argument tends to be that it has a better user interface (not hard to beat Git on that one...), but also because of its immutability. Core Mercurial makes it really hard to change history, and branches are strongly tied to commits instead of being moving bookmarks (I know that Mercurial has bookmarks, but we used branches). Simple and stable.

Now the arguments you give for Mercurial are absorb and evolve, commands designed for rewriting history, something that we felt Mercurial tried so hard to make difficult (for example by hiding them behind extensions). Something I find quite interesting, has Mercurial changed so much during last years? Maybe that's what you mean by "modern" even though they came out at almost the same time.

About GitHub. The simplicity of its bug tracker is supposed to be a feature. Too often, we find ourselves with all sorts of fields that ultimately doesn't serve much purpose. For example, what about priority and severity? I understand priority: sort by priority to pick the ones you should work on, but then, what's the point of severity? If both are correlated, one of them is redundant, if they are not, which one should I pay attention to? And what's the severity of a feature request? And am I allowed to make the cosmetic feature I really want a critical priority?

GitHub has tags and a description, this can already do a lot. It is messy, but real life is messy, and often, in bug trackers with lots of fields and categories, I don't know what to put in there because it doesn't really apply, but I still put something because I have to, contributing to noise, which is also messiness but shifted elsewhere.

This is not a criticism of the Mozilla way, just that there is more than one way of doing things.
I wonder how the map handled the accuracy issue of the timetable data: the public timetables are only accurate to the minutes, but the trains on the map are not only arriving / departing at 0 second. I believe accurate timetables that are accurate to 5 seconds (actual accuracy) are not published anywhere. I'm now very curious how accurate the trains on the map are, as there might be up to 55 seconds of error.

I don't have too many opportunities to take the trains nowadays, and when I had to take the trains I always forget to check this.
Can it import GED files?
I'm not sure there's a reliable distinction between the wealthy and the stupids. Very little wealth is generated solely or principally as a consequence of applied exceptional intelligence or talent.

Increasingly, as pools of wealth become so concentrated as to be impossible to consume entirely within a statistically average adult lifespan, and are thus passed on to offspring, there is little to no intelligence or talent necessary whatsoever.

For an extreme example consider that in my country we are about to endow yet another habitual gambler with a multi-billion dollar fortune, instantly catapulting them and their entire family over multiple generations, into status of what amounts to minor nobility. And their contribution to society, at least as far as this reward is concerned, is that they had the foresight to spend $5 or $10 or $100 on lottery tickets for the unknownteenth week in a row.
Sorry but this is just unrealistic.

My last job was quite diverse - I don't know the exact numbers, but there were definitely a lot of women (technical staff too! scientists etc.).

However, literally all of them were in the "drug development" part of the company (lab work, biochemistry, biology, etc - I don't know the specifics of what they do because I've no idea about biology/chemistry).

There were zero women in ML/tech departments.

Discrimination? Clearly the company had a culture that was open to hiring women.

But the fact is, women programmers (i.e. not biologists that learn programming as they need to) are simply so rare it's unrealistic to expect startups to hire them.
A Gulfstream G700 carries 22,407kg of fuel (about 6,100 gallons at 800kg/m^3 ) and a max range of 14,353km (8,918.5mi), for 1.45mpg. Closer to 10x, by a bit. Using the 12,316km high-speed cruise range manages to bring it down to 1.24mpg, just under 10x worse.
This is true and is contrary to this headline/quote. The oil sector is lobby for hydrogen but the attribution of motive is off. They are lobbying _for_ hydrogen, not against EVs.
To avoid bias, maintain objectivity, and focus on my personal interests and professional responsibilities without being influenced by any political affiliations or agendas.
people underestimate how long e-ink stagnated: it seems hard to imagine an alternate timeline where e-ink had taken the place of current LED outdoor billboards for example... until you realize we were decades away from LEDs being cheap and robust enough for outdoor signage when eInk was already fundamentally similar enough the tech we have now

The company that owned the e-ink patents couldn't scale properly until they were acquired around 2010: in an alternate timeline where development open enough in the early 2000s, we might have ended up with eInk display modules large enough to be assembled into incrementally larger and more profit driving devices

Even now you see that with eInk store tags for example: imagine if the profit they're driving now had arrived 20 years ago and gotten re-invested
And who is the actual arbiter who decides what is information and what is disinformation?

That smacks of the question "What is porn and what is not porn?"

We should all be free to choose for ourselves.
If your solution to avoiding political anxiety is to deny reality, then you're more likely to fall into cognitive bias and irrational reasoning patterns than accepting you have political inclinations and subjecting them to critical inquiry, being willing to change your mind and so on.
I ran that benchmark and can let you know what's going on. The benchmark switches templates using conditionals.

So what is happening is:

1. On the first render, every template that is rendered gets prepared. And there is that 46% improvement.
2. On the second render, some code paths change and some new templates that haven't yet been rendered get rendered. This results in a smaller improvement.

Then over time, as different code paths are exercised, the improvements of compilation reduce as every template has been seen at least once.
My game was invited to be in a Humble Bundle, and
Hamas received weapons, training from Iran before attack on Israel
Germany has a law about saying things are free. Like, you can't say pizza delivery is free because it isn't - it's wrapped up in the price of the pizza. In that way, electric vehicles aren't emissions free because they're charged by polluting power plants (most of the time).
As an alternative, check out Stencil.js. If you are componentizing within a controlled environment, then the shadow DOM feels like an unnecessary complexity. If the style collisions are a concern, you can turn on Stencil's scoped styling which dynamically creates unique css classes. It also has popular framework bindings so that you can output your components to work with different frameworks along with native web components.

However, if you are wanting to share your components with the world, starting with fresher code, and/or have the resources to tackle the shadow DOM gotchas then I would consider Lit over Stencil.

Just dropping this out here for those in the research phase as it wasn't super clear to me at first which way to go. Both are really good options but better for certain situations.
I doubt it. George Smiley is generally held up as a more representative figure, though I suspect (without any personal knowledge or evidence) he also is more a useful focal point for stories in which the supporting colleagues have more in common with their real life counterparts than either the owlish Smiley or the predator Bond.

Eg.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/sep/28/mi6-boss-geo...
> These models have no capacity to plan ahead

How would you describe the behavior of "GPT Advanced Data Analysis"?
CO2 reduces the viscosity of oil, and helps get more oil out of the oil well.

Even ignoring climate benefits, it's still worth pumping CO2 down the well for financial reasons alone - especially towards the end of the lifespan of classical oil wells.
Reading the Game: Kentucky Route Zero
OpenGL isn't a part of the ARM instruction set. There are plenty of arm chips that don't even have a GPU (e.g. name any embedded arm processor).
The "standard" GUI solutions on platforms like Windows, are also being abandoned in favor of React.
This might be true for big companies. If you are small you can very easily end up with all men with no bias at all because there are more men than women in the tech labor pool.

A 5 or 10 person company with all men is easily chance. A 100 person company with all men is probably either intentionally discriminating or doing something that really turns off female applicants.
> but it is technically correct answer as it said it depends on the order.

It should give you pause that you had to pick not only the line by which to judge the answer but the part of the line. The sentence immediately before that is objectively wrong:

> This is one possible scenario.
Thanks. This looks great!
>Ice vehicles gonna get squeezed out by economics

You mean ICE vehicles are going to get squeezed out by regulations.
Though the maintenance issue can be solved with a nitrogen pressure test before - the equivalent of electrical connectors verifying the connection digitally before sending the amps.