skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Government is just people doing certain tasks.

That you are afflicted with some mind virus that any of this semantic gobbledygook is real is your problem.

We need people interested in doing those specific tasks because I for one don’t care you exist and have no obligation to carry your flag or chant your babble.

We’re arbitrary meat suits. It’s better for you to have such a group out there. I never asked to exist, feel no obligation to humans. I’d rather you not exist altogether.

So that’s why “government”. Too many others lack interest in you specifically and would just hang you from a tree.
To be fair, Hollywood expects you to be shooting subsonic ammunition at close range.
I don't think you can have a $0 control group just because you have to pay the controls to fill out your surveys and such, otherwise their stats will be very out of whack.
Green hydrogen is developing now, and is very real, and is based on polysilicon solar advancements and PEM electrolyzer advancements, both of which provide ~3 decadal cost-down paths. See these two companies of ours:

[1] https://ohmium.com
[2] https://novohydrogen.com
Would this benefit encourage you to use GraphQL as your backend/data api layer?
I'm so ready for any and all progress on health monitoring. Use cases like early detection and monitoring of strokes, seizures, Parkinson's, dementia, and so forth.

Per Rosalind Picard, we're just at the very beginning of affective computing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affective_computing

"Yes please" to each and every single thing Picard and others are working on.

https://www.affectiva.com/what/products/

https://imotions.com/products/imotions-lab/modules/fea-facia...
HTTP/2 'Rapid Reset' zero-day exploited in biggest DDoS deluge seen yet
Attacks on NetScaler Gateways aim for user credentials
Sure, there are purposes where plastic makes the most sense. But I feel that we have walked too far the opposite way when we are detecting these microplastics just about everywhere. That's the nice part of using natural materials like metal and wood, you aren't putting anything into the environment that its not already had strategies to deal with for millions of years.
My understanding is liquid hydrogen could be a contender for a green jet fuel alternative. Batteries are too heavy.
The long poll in GPT isn't network; it's compute. Unfortunately, the tech probably isn't there yet for this use case.
Not sure who's pocket you're in but you need to get your facts straight. I can convert anything from a Model T to a modern vehicle from ICE to EV with nothing more complex than a conversion kit, and those come in flavors. Want to keep your original transmission and drive train? They make EV kits in a form factor to replace just the motor portion of a power train. Not married to having a stick shift? Toss the entire drive train, drop in a solid rear axle with hub motors. Fact is you can convert a vehicle from ICE to EV in a weekend and most of the work involves removing unnecessary deadweight.
Coupled with Google's very shaky support track record and you have a very dangerous combination. This will surely get ugly.
The last item of the FAQ says, "Family Echo is a free service, supported by advertising."
The article mentions a need for primary keys for data sync. Does anyone know if compound primary keys are currently supported? That's been a huge pain for me with the existing stack, so it would be nice to have an alternative.
> anonymized customer data and finding that shoppers taking the diabetes drug

So the data was not very "anonymized".
I despise how some companies opted to scrape artists works without their permission.

But aren't the prompts used also representative of a thought process? The chosen network architecture and the choices of images used to train also represent thought.
Like BP? https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/bp-joins-forces-with-harmony...

or Exxon? https://www.aa.com.tr/en/p/duyurular/1002/exxonmobil-launche...

or Chevron? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/ev-charging-startup-ele...
Electrification for millions and millions of cars will never work, we don't have the "green" energy resources to actually produce that electricity, and second, and just as important, we don't have the distribution network that will be able to carry that extra power (both in the US and in Europe).

So that leaves us with the logical conclusion that we won't have millions and millions personal cars going forward, for better or for worse.
There's a big difference in complexity of predriving and having to make minor adjustments vs automatic routing and planning. Kind of like how most cars can do adaptive cruise control but getting full self driving is still a ways out.
In case you mean the games on iPhone on the App Store, they generate revenue for Apple via in game transactions and not by game sales necessary. What people typically play on PCs are not the same games. Most of the games, as you can see with CS2, aren’t even available on iOS or macOS which is a problem. Outside of that I think you can run the games for iPhone on Mac as well but even then optimisation is necessary.
I don't think the product placement in the books is like product placement in movies and TV today. The products were things that he liked (Rolex Oyster Perpetuals, "Sea Island" cotton shirts, getting your cigarettes made for you or smoking "Senior Service", eating scrambled eggs etc).

It only seems weird in retrospect now that it has become common.
Last I looked into it, tortoise-ttl
On the Get Quote page, the labels for the "You need:" section are not pointing to the radio buttons properly. "Comment" is also misspelled on that page as well as on the Contact page

Also, the Testimonials all use the phrase "Francisco and his team" when talking about the company which make the responses sound canned
I'm all about _private_ people giving their money away to those less fortunate, but guys... We're talking about a city that is a mile high in altitude and has exotic Winter and Snow seasons, and this is a 6 month study?
I have fun trying to explain this problem. Let me see if I can give an explanation that will help you.

So lets say you have just picked a door in the beginning. You know you have a 1/3 chance of being right.

If I then tell you, "I will give you two options... you can either bet you are right, or bet that you are wrong"

You would obviously choose to bet you are wrong, correct? Because you know you only have a 1/3 chance of being right with your guess, which means you have a 2/3 chance of being wrong. The smart bet is that your original guess was wrong.

This is actually what is happening in the game if you think about it. You pick a door and it has 1/3 chance of being the right one; since we know Monty is only going to ever reveal a goat and never the prize, we don't even NEED Monty to reveal the door at this point - we know he is going to reveal a goat, no matter what. We don't even have to wait to see which door he reveals, since that isn't going to give us more information (it is going to be a goat, no matter what). So when he asks you if you want to switch doors, he isn't asking you to switch to ONE of the other two doors, he is asking if you want to switch to having BOTH other doors as your choice. Whether he reveals the goat before or after you choose to switch doesn't matter, because you know it will always be a goat.

If that is still not clear, lets just write out all the options:

There are three doors, A B C. One has a prize, the other two have goats. Let see what happens with your two options (switch or dont switch).

In our first example, you pick door A and you are going to switch.

1/3 of the time the prize is behind door A. If the prize is behind door A, and you switch, you lose. This is 1/3 of the time, and you lose for switching.

1/3 of the time the prize is behind door B. You picked door A, so Monty reveals door C. You switch to the remaining door (B) and you win.

1/3 of the time the prize is behind door C. You picked door A, so Monty reveals door B. You switch to the remaining door (C) and you win.

Add up all those choices, and 2 out of the 3 times you win.

Now lets imagine that we DON'T switch.

1/3 of the time the prize is behind door A. Monty reveals one of the other doors, but you don't switch. You win.

1/3 of the time the prize is behind door B. Monty reveals door C, but you don't switch from A. You lose.

1/3 of the time the prize is behind door C. Monty reveals door B, but you don't switch. You lose.

So in this not switching world, you win 1/3 of the time.

In summary, switching wins 2/3rds, not switching wins 1/3.

Does that help at all?
It's difficult not to see the "it's for your own security" argument as a cynical lock-in ploy.

Because you can export plain-text passwords just fine, and they give you exactly the same access as a PassKey does.
I see now - Hacki renders italics, but the browser doesn't.

Excuse my confusion, this possibility didn't occur to me.
Classic cars are much easier to convert to electric than hydrogen. I’m not even sure anyone would make a kit to do it. There’s just so much complexity with fuel cells.
Clients stopped using HTTP/1.1 pipelining because it just didn't work well enough.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_pipelining#Implementation...
Haskell support should land sooner rather than later actually! We are very very close it’s just that the Haskell compiler unfortunately creates binaries that don’t comply to the x86 ABI. It’s not too dramatic though, it just shuffles around a few registers’ purposes.
> has no refueling infrastructure

That's not true, there are a whopping five (5) hydrogen fuelling stations in Canada :D

https://natural-resources.canada.ca/energy-efficiency/transp...

I see some hydrogen cars from time to time on the road. They belong to some government agency. I wonder how many actual hydrogen cars there are in the entire country, it's probably less than a hundred ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
It is niche but growing less so by the day as conversion kits mature and more options make it onto market.
> KiCad is easily better than any ECAD tool you can buy for $1,000 or less.

Well, we pulled the plug on Altium when KiCad 6.0 was released and have not looked back. We got really sick of Altium nonsense, just had enough of it. Their focus on cloud to sell the company really caused damage and every release broke something new.

We do everything from relatively simple four layer boards to complex multi-GHz boards with challenging signal and power integrity constraints. KiCad has no problem at all providing the tools we need to complete these designs. I can't see ever going back to Altium.

As far as libraries are concerned. Professional organizations rarely (I would say, never) use built-in libraries. The reason for this is that you are responsible for reliability, manufacturability and product life-cycle. This means every component needs to be qualified and fully vetted to the extent required by the nature of the product. Which, in turn, means that you are always going to want to define all the components and use internally-built libraries you can trust. There are other reasons for this, that's just the basics.
Hydrogen can be captured out of some of the oil wells they have. Its not about producing it from green energy they have a plan to keep extracting it from the ground.
Because they were born into it, people forget the US has been in a 70 year “blip” that’s pretty ahistorical and clearly not sustainable.

More likely then UBI or universal living wages, we’ll just see a return to communal living with shared responsibilities and far more modest personal luxuries: more multi-generational homes, a return of boarding houses and flops, etc

It doesn’t look anything like what we grew up imagining the future to look like, but it’s actually pretty livable overall. Many people already live that way throughout the world, without particular suffering, and even in the US/West most people did until quite recently.

However disappointing to the idea of progress, it’d just be a reversion to the proven norm.
Toyota is said to lose in excess of $100k per hydrogen car.
Nissan has famously owned the patent on large format NiCad batteries without producing them or offering them for sale on the open market. So you're right.
> As far as I know, basic income means that everybody receives a fixed income, rich or poor.

People frame it like that, but in practice it would be offset by increased taxes for most.

For example, everyone gets $20,000 per year as "universal" basic income. However, your taxes go up $20,000 per year or more because you weren't in the lowest tax bracket. We have to pay for the UBI somehow.

UBI of a substantial amount would be incredibly expensive. Expensive to the point that the taxes would have to dip all the way down into the middle class to make it work. So for the average person, that UBI would come in and then go right back out as taxes.
Lol at all; Hydrogen can't easily be transported in current pipelines; Can't be transported in current trucks, and can't be stored in current gas station tanks.

And if the gas station doesn't maintain its hoses, nozzles, or seals; you don't wind up with a slight smell, a carcinogenic irritation -- you experience frostbite to you hand immediately.
Sure but who pays for it? Who decides who gets to be rich?
> This is still a study about UBI

No, it isn't. You can't study UBI by giving income to people who don't currently have income. To study universal basic income, you have to give it to everybody--the same amount--including people who already have income, even people who don't need any additional income. And then you can look at all of the effects, negative (people ceasing to work, or not working as much, because they are now guaranteed a certain amount of income independent of how much they work--meaning that overall production of goods and services might go down even as demand goes up) as well as positive (people who previously didn't have income now having it and therefore having more options).

Studying having the spending of the income not be restricted might be worth doing, but that still doesn't make it a study of UBI, because having the spending be unrestricted is not the critical feature of UBI. We already have social programs that give income whose spending is unrestricted, such as SSI and SSDI. What we don't currently have is a program that gives the same income to everybody regardless of need or anything else. That is the key feature of UBI that would need to be studied if you want to claim to be "studying UBI".
> All it takes is a new pump at existing gas stations

"All it takes" is doing very heavy lifting in that sentence. There's a good reason that hydrogen fueling stations are basically non-existent aside from a few in California. Distribution and fueling is quite complicated compared to conventional liquid fuels.
A few months ago Google wouldn't even accept backup tokens for me. I was on vacation, and that tripped enough fraud detectors to cause problems. I couldn't log back in till I got on my home network and changed my password.
Lit was originally written by a group of engineers at Google, and most of the main team is still at Google working on Lit either full time or part time, though there's increasing contributions and governance from outside Google.
What would "convert existing cars" get you?

A BEV is so much simpler to build and maintain.
More to the point, currently only 1% (edit: some articles I've seen put it less than 0.1%[1]) of hydrogen is "green". The rest is mostly made out of natural gas, a process that releases just as much CO2 as if you'd burned it. H2 isn't a way to save the Earth, it's a way to save the Natural Gas industry.

[1]https://cleantechnica.com/2021/12/22/0-03-of-hydrogen-is-gre...
Things are certainly more of a blend now than what's presented in this presentation, but the presenter is a big Java platform guy here. I would say ~70% of the services I interact with on a day to day basis are Java, another 20% in Node, and then the last 10% is a hodgepodge of Python, Go, and more esoteric stuff.

It varies from team to team; the "Studio" organization that supports creating Netflix content does lots of nodeJS due to the perception that it's faster to iterate on a UI and API together if they're both in the same language. On my team, we're very close to 50/50 due to managing a bunch of backend, business process type systems (Java), and a very complex UI (with a NodeJS backing service to provide a graphql query layer). Regardless, the tooling is really quite good, so interacting with a Node service is roughly identical to interacting with a Java service is roughly identical to interacting with anything else. We lean into code generation for clients pretty heavily, so graphQL is a good fit, but gRPC and Swagger are still used pretty frequently.
Sure, and it's by and large viewed as a complete failure[0]. Is your argument that we should repeat that failure?

[0] https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/green-tech/a4266501...
Of course Basic Universal Income works in experiments. You select a group of people and give them money for some time. To be honest, it’s no longer basic nor universal. It’s just income.
I seem to recall he wasn't happy about it, but don't recall where he said that or what the details were. Could be wrong, wasn't paying that close attention. He also left after a while without immediately moving on to something else, so it seems he was unhappy about something there.
I wonder if any standard or experimental smartwatch sensors are more accurate when used in the ear canal vs the wrist.
Right, which is why claiming that this is a study of "universal basic income", as the GGP claimed, is wrong.
Fixing education?

What does education have to do with this? Are we really still pretending in this day and age that education is some magical panacea to fix even a fraction of the ills? A populace with a lot of education and a poor means to earn a living wage just means you'll end up with a lot of educated poor people.

The current way of things is an anomaly in human history. You can't have a continuous consolidation of wealth by the very few AND allow them to capture the means of production and pretend that things are going to be hunky dory in the long run. Either you ensure that the average person can have a comfortable life in your system, or heads are eventually going to start rolling. The only question is how long before that happens.
After rigorous testing, we have been able to confirm that our implementation of the HTTP/2 protocol can handle the Rapid Reset Attack without increasing the resource usage or compromising the parallelism of the protocol.

But doesn’t this mean the servers behind the reverse proxy would still suffer from increased/wasted resources responding to the rapid reset requests?
Do you block all ports except the ones that you use?
Saw a reddit thread on the topic, curious what the HN crowd thinks. I find that too restrictive but I'm not working with secret repositories or production secrets on my machine.
Midjourney Web Client
RISC-V Responds to U.S. Lawmakers: Open Standards Are Important
My old Suzuki SX4 (RIP) disabled cruise control when it threw a code, but so far as I could tell that was the only thing it did. Traction control still worked, automatic/manual all wheel drive still worked...it was also a secondary catalytic converter alarm, so I just kept a code reader with me and reset it whenever it would come on.

It would always come on after I got off the interstate and coasted up the on-ramp, so I am not sure if it came on after getting hot enough on the interstate or if it was just the coasting that caused it.
But the UBI works completely different at small and large scales. When you test it at small scale it seems to be working exactly as expected. But when you try to introduce it globally (I mean, for the whole country), then it suddenly starts affecting economy as whole, and the only result you get is inflation, and no one is better of with UBI compared to their previous situation. When the news breaks that everyone will be getting free money the natural reaction of all the sellers and service providers is to raise prices.

I mean, I know UBI haven't been tried at whole country scale, but the populist government in my country came pretty close, trying to bribe people with things like social security payments for parents (you get paid a pretty penny monthly for each child you have), or giving extra pension raises to retired people - basically giving away free money to everyone. And guess what? Inflation in my country peaked at 19% in February, luckily it fell down to like 8% in September.
Sorry, this is a field I have not thought about maybe ever.

What is the thing you want me to do?
Tell me of this denver subway...
Not even close. It requires a whole new delivery network, trucks, pipelines need to be re-sleeved and tons of safety measures. Switching to hydrogen from diesel or gasoline is a non-trivial exercise. And large scale storage is yet another problem. That's hard enough with LNG, LPG, diesel and gasoline, with hydrogen it is much more complex and carries more risk.
If you only include homeless people statistically you can expect that they will make poorer financial decisions than the rest of the population.

Also there are other implications, I’m not even sure what’s the point in calling this UBI (the data might of course be still valuable for other purposes).
If you're worried about firefighters, I'm not sure why you think hydrogen would be the solution. Hydrogen fires are invisible to the human eye, and carry an extremely high risk of catastrophic explosion. While a lithium fire isn't great, it's more the issue of "this is going to ruin the roadway that it's burning on" than "the firefighter is going to die trying to put it out".

https://www.osha.gov/green-jobs/hydrogen/fire-explosion#:~:t....
The issue I see here is that being a contrarian is not enough. In order to drive change, one must also have influence. It doesn't matter how good a design is if others are not quick to agree with it.
>> guaranteed access to pretty much everything that matters

> "game over devices" tend to be a bad idea

If you have something worth stealing, don't put it on your phone.

If you have $1000 in Robinhood or Coinbase along with passwords for TikTok and Instagram in your password manager, sure, put it all on your phone for convenience. It wouldn't be a catastrophe if they were stolen.

But if you have anything that's worth protecting, trade convenience for security. Keep banking, brokerage and crypto apps off the phone. Don't use your phone for password managers and 2FA.

Use a Chromebook with no extensions for sensitive stuff. It's less convenient, but there's no chance of life-changing theft if someone takes your phone at the club.
I assume the biggest difference is the area it can handle. I mow about 2 acres of grass, and none of the little mowers are close to fully replacing my zero turn mower. This seems like it could work well for me.
Charging to use an unofficial API will get you C&Ded very quickly.
The person in the thumbnail for the article is hitting my uncanny valley.
Batteries are heavy, expensive and we don’t have infrastructure to charge them at the required scale.

I don’t believe hydrogen is the answer but methane cells could be… liquid energy storage is just so much more practical compared to alternatives.
> After rigorous testing, we have been able to confirm that our implementation of the HTTP/2 protocol can handle the Rapid Reset Attack without increasing the resource usage or compromising the parallelism of the protocol.

You are free to conduct your own tests? AFAIK the software in question is free (both libre and commercially).
The rescue personnel will be safe because there won’t be anything of you left to rescue.
The skinnerbox whaling department; now with built-in hardware support!