skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I also run an nfs server in the same machine, so after a period of heavy nfs use, most of the ram were eaten by the disk cache and rke2/kubernetes start having memory pressure taint. After a fresh restart with all pods running, the memory usage is below 10%, so I doubt the disk cache was full with executable files cache.
Doesn't really matter if they're mostly indie game devs that weren't contributing major revenue to Unity anyway.
The difference is one of consent, which is what my example was constructed to illustrate. One is under threat, the other is voluntary.
I have the same feeling regarding much of what you said, with the slight difference that even though my body didn't feel the need to go to bed, strangely enough, after lying in bed for 20 minutes or so, I often fall asleep without noticing any sleepiness before that, just wide awake, and the next thing I know I am waking up in the morning.
I haven't heard of Blackmagic, but apparently many people understand the value here.

What I found strange is the images on their website have an AI generated look to them, rather than looking like they were shot with a real camera. Am I the only person who's seeing it that way?
Author here. I agree with you on preferring sockets to signals for IPC. It's more straightforward and stable to use it. This article is one of a series I'm writing on IPC. Writing about them ensures I understand them better. I wrote one on sockets[1].

[1] https://goodyduru.github.io/os/2023/10/03/ipc-unix-domain-so...
By the way that's the Bob Wilson who won the economics nobel with Milgrom, not the Bob Wilson who won the physics nobel with Penzias
Nuclear power should be run by the state, like in France.
Goalkeepers perceive the world differently, study suggests
If you are willing to toss out what we currently think we know about cause and effect, and quantum mechanics, then everything could be true. A separate soul, gods, angels, demons, life after death, everything. I’m about 50/50 on that one.
Humans invent things they don't fully understand basically always.
Current firmware is N1901041316

I do not have a manufacturer date but it would have been purchased in 2019 or later.
It is not the role of the board to make executive decisions like this. That's what the 'E' in CEO means.
Author here. Thanks for the feedback! Corrected the error.
The feature seems perfectly fine for those who want it, but the idea that you never opted in is troubling.

So the question is, how did your printer get linked to your Amazon account?

Possibilities:

1) You registered your printer with Brother (possibly when setting up wireless or cloud services) and put in your email address which is also the one associated with Amazon. Did you opt in without realizing (via a dark pattern? hidden in TOS?)? Or did they opt you in without any consent at all?

2) You bought the printer from Amazon and they already knew the printer serial number (common with certain electronics brands) and that's how it got associated. Perhaps there's a notice on the add-to-cart or checkout page that you'll be enrolled, or an opt-in checkbox? Or maybe it is without consent?
Generally, we have odd on one side and even on the other, so this isn't likely.

The odds and evens are usually also allocated sequentially and independently, so it can be incredibly annoying when you're looking at the numbers on the wrong side of the road thinking you're getting close when you're actually walking away from the house because the numbers are much higher or lower on the other side.
PAF isn't strictly a list of addresses in the sense anybody other than the Post Office (and maybe parcel delivery firms) would care about.

PAF is a list of delivery points to which they can deliver mail. So for example the place I work isn't listed, you can't deliver mail to it even though it's a large building with multiple entrances and you'd obviously be able to direct people here specifically, but mail "for us" goes to some admin building several minutes walk away across campus.
"Did you just tell me to go fuck myself?"

"I believe I did, Bob."

I'm being more than a bit mean here, in my attempt to be slightly amusing, because there's actually an obvious workaround: dynamically link with the LGPL library, like people usually do, and then it's nice and easy. The sort of systems where this would be difficult are the sort of systems where actually distributing a GPL program is just going to be annoying anyway, and you're probably better off not even trying.

But it is actually an interesting idea! I assume for the average program you'd be including more of your symbol information than you might like, though, as object files have to find their external symbols somehow! (I imagine LTCG will add a lot of additional information as well. All this would add up to a lot of useful info that would assist in the sort of reverse-engineering effort that proprietary software vendors would like to make more tedious, rather than less so.)

But, if you really wanted to do it, and didn't mind putting a bit of effort in, you could probably do something. An enormous non-LTCG translation unit containing all of the code, probably.
It's much cheaper, faster, and less risky (financially) to replace them with renewables. It's a bit of an academic exercise anyway at this point because it just takes a decade plus to plan any new nuclear. That's based on a sample of next to nothing because there just isn't a whole lot of nuclear coming online at all. Nor is there a whole lot of capacity stuck in the planning or construction pipeline. And what little does come online does so late, over budget, etc. So those handful of pitiful plants are not a great reference from the point of view of convincing people to do some more. Renewables on the other hand are coming online by the tens of gw every year. There are still learning effects, and prices are still coming down further.

As for baseload (which I assume is what you are referring to here), that seems to be an elusive concept that is just never expressed in twh. Because as soon as you do that, you can start imagining all sorts of alternative and much cheaper, practical, less hand wavy, and faster ways of getting that capacity in place than building actual nuclear plants at scale.

I mean, how many nuclear plants do we actually need? 2, 5, 200? At least put a number on it. Do we need any plants at all? Nobody seems to know this or want to talk about this in any level of detail that you could use to actually start planning some budgets for this. It's just presumed lazily that we need unspecified (typically to the extent of committing nontrivial percentages of the world's GDP to this) amounts of it to ensure our anxiety levels stay within acceptable range. It's completely irrational at this point.

Meanwhile, the amount of wind and solar coming online keeps beating expectations and battery production is ramping up from gwh scale to twh scale per year. It's the only practical alternative that exists to nuclear right now. And it's being done at a ridiculous scale because it's an order of magnitude or two cheaper (and dropping further). To make a dent into that, you need a lot of nuclear plants at this point for it to even matter and at a much lower cost than most nuclear proponents seem willing to entertain. I don't see that happening really. Doubling or quadrupling the amount of renewables + battery seems much easier, doable, and cheaper at this point. Especially if it needs to be done in a timely fashion.
I find that a USB-A fits reasonably by feel into an Ethernet port for extra points.
This is it. Bad press? Developer feedback? These, by themselves, are no concern to the board.

But my man here lost three billion dollars of investor money and for that he needs to go.
Co-author of article here.

Yeah a ton of the time and effort has gone into building robustness and observability into the process. When dealing with millions of files, a failure half way through it is imperative to be able to recover.

RE: Weaviate: Yeah, we needed to use large amounts of memory with Weaviate which has been a drawback from a cost perspective, but that from a performance perspective delivers on the requirements of our customers. (on Weaviate we explored using product quantization. )

What type of performance have you gotten with Lance both on ingestion and retieval? Is disk retrieval fast enough?
It would be interesting to know why Microsoft was so incredibly stubborn to not allow to filter by colors / collect value of color in a cell.

I am very, very aware that this is the wrong way to do things, but users really prefer to take their list and color their wrong cells red and the correct cells in green instead of using a separate column for "status".
Of course a separate column with status then allows to have the 99999 different type of statuses that are created.. but is just clunkier.

And I know that you can now (after how many years?) filter by colors, what again is clunky if there are multiple colors, but you cannot get the cells color without custom VBA.

A simple "cellcolor()" formula would allow to make faster color filters.

It is very funny that every organization seems to have a "database" which is a list of stuff. And "big data" is when this list does not fit to Excel anymore.
This is somewhat related as it's the next step of the above.

The floating tongue of the USB connection is in the socket, not the on the cable. As in the most fragile part of the design is on the device side, not the cable side. This means that you can more easily break your $1000 device not the $2 cable. They repeated this mistake with USB-C as well.

It's not hard to make a port where the cable is the free floating tongue and the device is a more robust socket that wraps around that fragile piece. I know everyone's happy about the iPhone moving to USB-C but the tongue on the cable side that it had was much better. Anyone who's tripped on a cable and broken a USB socket can attest to this.
>Distinct profiles of multisensory processing between professional goalkeepers and outfield football players

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(23)...
Do you call him The Bear?
Author here. I've corrected the errors. Thanks!
Whilst a lovely achievement, this title definitely overstates current robot abilities. Here is some human parkour for contrast:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QHqAVaQqQWQ&t=106s
https://photographylife.com/iso-shutter-speed-and-aperture-f...
> Whether you see this as a degradation of or improvement upon HN culture is up to you. There's nothing much anyone can do about it.

It's going to inevitably have a reputational impact on the larger YCombinator org (speaking from personal experience).

It takes one controversional flame war to blow up this entire forum, especially given how much more divisive the world is.
No, Go isn't appropriate for these things. Use the best tool for the job
The printer was purchased at a store called Best Buy.

The only interaction that it has ever had with my Amazon account was that I ordered a single purchase of replacement ink cartridges. The idea of it monitoring their status is abhorrent to me and I don't think I would have ever opted in for such thing. Perhaps there was something requiring me to opt out, but ...it was not apparent.

When my Alexa searched for devices connected to my network, it must have noted this printer, then compared it to the fact I ordered ink for it, and just to be extra helpful decided to monitor its levels for me. I can think of no other way...
You're probably joking, I don't know, but I am now thinking about doing this.
Depending on the specifics of your financial situation, age, and healthcare utilization, it can actually be in your best interest to pay more out of pocket and save your HSA money for retirement.
Dislike the Affero for being onerous too, however:

How do you run the code on your local computer if the code was not distributed to you?

It is similar as the old days of having to distribute to you the compiled code for you to install on your local computer.
I’m surprised that you’re surprised about this. Credit card bills are the original dark pattern. Every other bill you receive has a single number in a box that says “pay this amount”, and when you pay that amount, you’re done. But with credit card bills, the number in the “pay this” box doesn’t mean you’re done, it means that you’re going to keep paying forever. It took a literal act of Congress (CARD Act - 2009) to force them to add the disclosure to the bill that making the minimum payment would increase the time and interest you’d be paying.
It's not "mass hysteria" to observe that your business partner is willing to attempt to retroactively change the terms of your arrangement with them, and therefore decide they aren't trustworthy as a business partner. The actual monetary cost to developers is actually quite inconsequential compared to the lack of integrity Unity showed in trying to make this apply to games which were already released.
Wouldn't it be more interesting to learn real physics instead of made up stuff?
Porn. There's so much free content (even amateur), yet some people pay big money for it.
How does the NT kernel handle OOM situations, compared to Linux? I know it feels a lot smoother and almost like a non problem (it will slow down for a few seconds and get back to normal), but I wonder what goes on behind the scenes and why (if?) Linux has a different approach
How do we test this alleged distinction between "true reasoning" and statistical parroting? What experiments can we perform on SotA models to make this idea falsifiable?

Commonplace hypotheses like these give me strong "No True Scotsman" vibes, but I'm often wrong. Let's agree on a method, and I'll test it.
Isn't Riccitiello stepping down a standard operation procedure in a situation like this?
Has the link been edited? And are you taking about the question or the answers? In the question, __builtin_popcount is the slowest of the 3 options on both compilers.
The fact that it's possible for a middlebox to detect ECH at all is a flaw in the protocol, IMO.
I think you are, in fact, too cynical. They've already announced the new fee structure which is a lot more sensible. And before you go "that's how they wanted people to react to the final structure", there's no way how this thing unfolded came to the benefit of the company and they'd have been idiots if this was in any way the plan.
I have an IT job and there's no way I'm able to buy anything. It's just impossible.
See my other comment on this. I did not register it with Brother, and have no account with Brother. Given this is Amazon, I cannot help but feel pessimistic that this was done without consent.
Yesterday you submitted the story "Iran Helped Plot Attack on Israel over Several Weeks" plus the comment "This is on-topic for HN. 6 of my direct reports are SWEs and HN commentators, but have been drafted and mobilized by the Israeli army due to this crisis."

That's very much political. You can't have it both ways.
Nuclear engineer here:

These plants need on-site diesel generators to provide site-power in case of loss of off-site power (grid failure). Here the operator had leaks in fuel lines that fed both the A and B generators. These are the only generators of on-site emergency power.

An operating reactor needs approximately 2-5 days to cool due to build-up of radioactive decay products in the core, which continue to generate heat even after the reactor has been fully shutdown (in the case of an emergency, a sudden shutdown of the reactor is called a SCRAM).

On-site power serves the primary purpose of driving core-recirculating coolant loops to control the core temperature. Chief metrics in reactor safety generally relate back to core-damage-frequency (CDF), because when one damages the fuel-casing or core, this is the most-likely precursor to releasing radioactivity. CDF determinations are almost directly linked to loss-of-coolant-accidents (LOCAs) which imply that one can no longer cool the nuclear fuel core or elements.

Total station blackout, which is a result of loss of off-site and on-site power, combined with a SCRAM is essentially the scenarios that led to Fukushima and Chernobyl disasters. The NRC will not treat this lightly.
But we've seen anti matter and we already _know_ it doesn't have negative mass.
Even if it's tiny, it could still have the line wrap done more intelligently.
That's not really what's going on. Those "native" APIs you mention in most cases just call back to Java APIs under the hood. For better or worse, most of what Android is is written in Java. There's no hidden "C++" layer of Android to access.
I agree.

I am part of the problem.

Hence why I am asking for commentators like me to be purged.

I posted in a fit of emotion, which goes to show why we need to prevent political conversations - plenty of rational people lose rationality when faced with divisive conversations.
France is a country, silly.
Not to the extent that most countries would need to. It's a bit silly in financial/economic terms to have cash just sitting there doing nothing, while you take out a costlier mortgage on something else.

Most of the infrastructure debt that you're likely to be thinking of is taken out by other countries who have China constructing the railways, etc, used in making the BRI. China is shelling out plenty of cash for those railways, etc in the near term, while the other countries will pay it off over the longer term.
> The idea that generalities can't be true or useful is pretty insidious

This idea was not mentioned, whether or not you attest that it was.
The Future of CSS: Easy Light-Dark Mode Color Switching with Light-Dark()
I enjoy fantasy physics more than regular physics by a pretty large margin.
Yes and yes. It depends, and is highly situation dependent, I have experience with the entire spectrum. Rural areas blur lots of lines and defy neat categorization. There's a patchwork of private land and forestry land. If there's miles of logging road and 1-4 people use it to access their property outside the wet season, which category are you putting that in? What about 10-20 properties?

What about 100+?

It just depends.
> UART without silicon

Here's the actual serial data decoder, from when I was restoring a Teletype machine.[1] There's a short essay on mechanical design philosophy over there.

> It's such a foreign concept in the computer age, where you never want any information to be exclusively analog like that, you never want to directly rely on a steady hand, and drawings are just a UI on top of numbers and constraints.

Which is why AutoCAD was so successful. Engineering departments used to have huge rooms full of people at large drafting tables. Good drafting rooms had north-facing skylights. HP's old headquarters on Page Mill Road has four large buildings like that.

[1] https://brassgoggles.net/forum/index.php/topic,43672.0.html
I don't think you can really draw conclusions from an interim pick like this one.

It's who they choose after the search that will tell you something.

But things don't look good no matter who they choose. Unity has to become sustainable... that, or go out of business. Their fundamental problem is somehow getting revenue and costs in line with each other.

Here are some general ways that could be done...

* Squeeze a lot more money out of existing customers
* Get a lot more paying customers
* Cut spending on things that impact revenue a lot less than the cut saves

The first one is what the last CEO tried with that cockamamie licensing scheme. You could go at it in other ways but in the end the impact on customers is the same so I don't think the reaction would be a lot better.

Is there any clear way to accomplish the second, at least without an even larger negative impact on revenue?

For investors, cutting cost is the least desirable -- they want to grow, not shrink. And customers also don't like to get less for the same price. But perhaps there is a way to cut costs that would spare what provides the core value to customers, and perhaps a business guy could get shareholders to accept that it is the only way.
Exactly; it's effectively the same thing but with a rolling one-month interest-free float.
It's so messed up when you think about it. He made a decision (or at minimum allowed it to happen) that will most likely kill the company in the end. And he gets to profit handsomely from being fired for that bad decision.
My company had products with custom plastics. For us it's just non reoccurring engineering (NRE).

What's to like about outsourcing it. It's parallelizable so you can work on your core competency while they work. Core competency, this is your angle that allows you to make money. How to lose money, working on stuff outside that. They get it done faster and without fuckups. And the outputs are something you can just give to a manufacturer. If there is an issue the two of them hash it out not you.

Only thing not to like is the wad of cash you need to cough up. But really if you don't have that you're hosed anyways. And paying to get revenue coming in a couple of months sooner is so worth it.
I've seen the same tutoring math. It's tough to get through, as it's a learning style that got them this far. Of course, not they are needing tutoring, so it's stopped working.

How does writing code by hand fix this? They can still write the same things from the same understandings. I've had some luck having people explain things to me, without looking at the code/math.
most of the 2d ones are looking to Godot
SpaceX rocket launch from Vandenberg lights up skies, rattles windows
> These models are made so that enterprise clients will pay a lot of money to use them.

That's not obvious to me. Why wouldn't they eventually be targeting consumer market like search engines?

Speaking of which, why don't search engines like Bing and Google forcibly censor pornographic queries? Why am I allowed to search and view pictures of Xi Jingping juxtaposed with Winnie the Pooh on Bing and Google without my hand getting slapped? Why are search engines exempt from getting roasted by the media for serving up inappropriate results in response to inappropriate queries?
Egyptian banks suspend debit card use in foreign currency
What happens when your storage detaches from your k8s cluster? Your services start 503ing, hopefully, because you didn't design your system thinking that k8s == 100% uptime.
Yes, so three classes. I’m counting a Java interface as a class, because it is the same as a purely abstract class. In any case, three different named types.

As a side note, I would say the interface is unmodifiable, not immutable, because references of the interface type may refer to mutable instances that can mutate while you use it through the interface. Immutable = doesn’t change state, unmodifiable = you can’t change it’s state via that reference (but it might change it’s state due to other concurrent code holding a mutable reference). This nomenclature comes from the “unmodifiable” collection wrappers in Java, which don’t make the underlying object immutable.
The notion of consequences & responsibility at this level, which is often used to justify high pay (see also: the idle investor class—“oh, they deserve huge returns because of all the risk they’re taking!”) is so fake that the whole thing would be funny if people didn’t seem to think it’s actually real and meaningful.

“Oh no, I had a terrible outcome and so… me, my children, and my children’s children, at least, will continue to live among the oligarchs and attend oligarch schools and live in oligarch places and go to oligarch parties, being incredibly comfortable and wanting for nothing our whole lives.”

Please, give me those consequences. I promise it’ll make me take everything super-seriously and do a very good job. Lord knows I don’t want that to happen to me. How terrible.