skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The "internet" itself was growing wildly through the dot com crash, though. That was an investment cycle: more money in aggregate was flinging around to "make network stuff" than there was revenue to be had selling it in the short term.
There was no doubt in anyone's mind that everyone wanted and was rapidly adopting a global network and creating new markets.

AI right now is way behind that spot on the adoption curve. We have a lot of very impressive stunts that don't yet seem like "products" or "markets". And we have a lot of ideas awaiting implementation. But it needs to cross that bridge.

I think it's reasonable to assume there's at least one bust/boom cycle to come in the AI world before we get to a steady state.
By "we" I mean those of us who have no direct power, but work to convince those with power to pass the laws. The legislature isn't going to do it without that
Correct in what way? Not correct if you want the best performing model. And if it doesn't outperform the current best model nobody will care about you. For a company like Mistral that could be the end for them.

I'm not saying it uses books3, it might not. I'm just saying why it might make sense to risk it.
S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus
I wrote another comment the other day (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37125685) about how GraphQL has true typing unlike bolted on solutions to REST, and that most people use GraphQL incorrectly then complain about how they're running into problems with N+1 and all that. Basically, the way Facebook originally designed it was in combination with Relay and its graph query optimizing compiler that can stitch your entire app's query data together so that you never over- or under-fetch, at all. If you just use it like REST, you're gonna have a bad time.

The comment:

GraphQL is very useful, it removes whole classes of bugs. You can even use a Result/Either type where if you don't handle both the success and error cases, the GraphQL request won't even compile, so you can get type safety at both the client and the server while also not having to use purely TypeScript like with tRPC, allowing multiple clients like mobile and web. Pothos does this very well as an error extension [1], where, given the schema:

type Error {
message: String!
}

type Query {
hello(name: String!): QueryHelloResult
}

union QueryHelloResult = Error | QueryHelloSuccess

type QueryHelloSuccess {
data: String!
}

you can then query it with

query {
hello(name: "World") {
__typename
... on Error {
message
}
... on QueryHelloSuccess {
data
}
}
}

If you forget `... on Error` the query will simply fail.

I should also add that most people use GraphQL incorrectly, to get the benefits of not over/underfetching, the Relay approach using fragments is the only viable way currently. Otherwise it's not too much better than REST. You define the exact data required for a specific React component in GraphQL fragments, then the Relay compiler will stitch those fragments together into one and only one request. This is a great (if long) overview on the problems Relay solves and why everyone else uses GraphQL incorrectly (then complain that GraphQL sucks) [2]. Hint, Apollo is not the way.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yab6i9lrEv0

[1] https://pothos-graphql.dev/docs/plugins/errors

[2] https://alan.norbauer.com/articles/relay-style-graphql
direct link to the PDF: https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.2218679120

(Well, as direct as one can get -- it's doing that "please enable cookies the url doesn't actually end in dot pee dee eff" crap)

it's not open access if i have to give up my data imho
Afaik hacker news pages are stored on the file system.
There's a difference between using a car every day and using a car once in a while.
Sorry, I am not convinced. To me, Pascal's syntax and source code organization is archaic. Even more archaic would be COBOL and BCPL. On a somewhat similar level to Pascal, perhaps Erlang as well.

People's opinions do change over time, but I do not think it's likely that there is a renaissance awaiting Pascal's overall design decisions, specifically the ways in which Pascal differs from C. That's because differing from C is costly and requires justification. In some cases, I think Pascal's decisions just proved wrong; like the lack of short-circuiting in boolean expressions. I assume modern Pascal compilers have resolved this, but it's a good example of how I think things go: ideas that improve the status quo are worth bringing back, ideas that have a lot of switching costs are a hard sell.

I also understand that sometimes the difference may seem superficial, and that's because they are. Are Pascal units really vastly different from modern translation units/modules? Somewhat, but not that much. But it differs enough that someone not familiar with Pascal needs some time to adapt, whereas almost anyone with programming experience of any level can pick up Go, because it's stupidly simple. It does differ from C and other languages that are still contemporary, but when it does differ it's often good: the type syntax and declaration syntax is massively simpler than C, for example. (And yes, Pascal's type syntax is also better, at least by some measures.)

I'm happy to discuss these matters, but I will also be completely honest: I'm not particularly moved by this line of argument. It feels somewhere between semantics and an implicit desire to consider a future where Pascal syntax somehow becomes in vogue again as it was in the early 2000's. Maybe an evolved Pascal, but not the Pascal of today. And if I'm wrong, I'm wrong; I'm just calling it the way I see it.
> There is a reason spectrum is regulated

Yeah because it's scarce and if overuse leads to pollution and interference.

It's not because [x] group of people are too dumb and shouldn't have ideas voiced.
"Hey, you can't afford to care for your pet. I'm willing to spend several thousand dollars of my own money, but there's likely more care in the future, and I'd like to ensure the animal then lives with somebody who can afford any future care"

"You predatory monster!"

Do you think even for a moment through what you're saying, or is this just reflexive on your end?

Also, in what world is a median annual income of $100k, for a job with expensive and long training, "mercedes money"? If you have actual evidence of most vets making "vast sums", maybe it'd a good time to share that.
Here's a video that goes into some detail on how they're attached: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X30coNL4Jw8
As much as I wish that were true, it isn't really true. There is definitely a complex of businesses behind veterinarian offices with the intent of driving up prices.
This is a follow up and conclusion to the HN post about the discovery of this a few days ago here[0].

Upstream commit is here[1]

Glad to see it has been root caused and worked around in such short order.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37812556

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/...
Trees prevent that 110F in the shade from become 120F on asphalt and concrete.
Also easier to scale out from your single starter k3s node as you grow.
I'm not sure if that's a viable dismissal, quoting from the paper they looked at travel which was at least 20 km and I'm not sure if albatrosses can reasonably make out visible features of waves at that distance.

> We analyzed the directional preference of wandering albatrosses in relation to available microbarom sound pressure as well as wind speed and direction. This analysis depended on identifying ‘decision points’, points at which the bird decides upon a direction to head in. After splitting GPS tracks into bouts of either directed flight, searching, or resting behavior, we isolated bouts of directed flight exceeding 20 km and extracted the first GPS fix in each bout as the ‘decision point’ (Fig. 1A).
Disinformation is code word for censorship. Evangelize common sense and leave it at that.
The core Internet protocols (IP, TCP, UDP) haven't changed much, other than IPv6. We now have some amazing TCP refinements for congestion control and packet loss. In general, anything you learned about this stuff 30 years ago would still apply.
it was incredibly difficult to evict people in my area during COVID, as that required an eviction hearing and those were on hold for quite a long time.
The CEO of Meta, who lives in the US? Good luck with that.
Google Cloud Spanner is now half the cost of Amazon DynamoDB
I will go out of my way to make sure I consume nothing generated by AI just to spite people like you. AI art and speech is dystopian and off-putting when you realize it's just some machine learning algorithm regurgitating some garbage it was fed before and has no sincere human work or attention to detail. It also steals the works of artists and writers to provide literally nothing of value, and AI bros will fight tooth and nail in court to assure they can keep stealing people's shit.
It does, but only if you use it as intended, ie with Relay: https://alan.norbauer.com/articles/relay-style-graphql

Otherwise, yes, it's not better than REST.
The legislation is https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/part/I/chapter/...

Long ago I had to read the Act on microfiche.
FTX insurance fund status was just a random number
I think one issue is that on the internet it's becoming impossible to know anything. You can't know that those thousands of accounts are trolls or neighbors. Does freedom of speech grant you the right to use a troll/bot army to spread misinformation? I suppose if each troll/bot were labeled I would be fine with it but they aren't, they pollute these online spaces. Whose speech is being protected?
> many thousands of miles of off-road wilderness

That's a form of third place. You don't need to be actively sharing it with other people but everyone still agrees that it's shared.
Kubernetes is offering much more features than Docker compose. And then you have all the kubernetes operators and other extensions that makes it very complex and powerful.

It’s fine to use docker compose if it does what you need. If you start hacking weird things using Docker compose, it’s perhaps time to suffer and learn kubernetes.
In the third angle, you can see the guy with the power-wrench for the left-front wheel. F1 cars have a single lug per wheel (which is a big reason why pits are faster than in NASCAR).
If you're just messing around, just use kind (https://kind.sigs.k8s.io) or minikube if you want VMs (https://minikube.sigs.k8s.io). Both work on ARM-based platforms.

You can also use k3s; it's hella easy to get started with and it works great.
Generally, social media companies have agreed there is some responsibility to remove false content and coordinated misinformation. That certainly seems to be happening, and linking to particular misinformation just spreads it further, feeding the trolls.

https://www.mediaite.com/tech/a-coordinated-propaganda-campa...
We're back to the article situation though, the with owners being bitter and unsupportive and the vets in depression and suicidal.
Accessible for who, do you mean? That is in no way 'accessible' without solid exposure to quite a lot of discrete maths (which I have and it's still hard going).

λf :(τ 1 × τ 2 ) → τ 3 .λx:τ 1 .λy:τ 2 .f (x,y)
has type
((τ 1 × τ 2 ) → τ 3 ) → (τ 1 → τ 2 → τ 3 ).

Yeah, that's accessible.
My comparison is to a young healthy pet who reaches end of life, as pets tend to do. I did the math, including interest on self-insurance savings and deductibles and co-pays. In my circumstance, insurance would have saved me thousands of dollars. Of course, I might not have needed it. Or it might have saved me $20,000. It's risk management. Pay a medium amount to hedge against the possibly having to pay an exorbitant amount.
The best defense is: Politics is not a game of morals, virtues, or arguments, but a game of power, manipulation, and maneuvers. In that context, I think we can agree this is a win :) It'll be easier to override that clause down the line than it was to pass this bill.
You'd have to get past the lobbyists for the residential REITs and private equity lenders who don't want anyone to help with the housing crises because it'll cut into their profits.
Street Name in Britain? [video]
Safe harbor must be protected. If you start policing users it’s a super slippery slope.
Uh no. Not multiple formats.

Different messaging systems, libraries, etc should use a JSON-equivalent binary format.

If you'd like you could say it's messagepack, but it's not because it's a superset of the JSON model, you can't round trip it
Deploy web apps anywhere with Kamal Deploy
There is a censorship in USA as well. No country has truly freedom of speech.
Or being in a financial situation where you can afford a house and are insulated from inflation leads to less stress.

The “link” is more likely to financial stress than the kind of housing you’re in.
Extradition treaties exist.

Or just go the US route and do an extraordinary rendition. They don't seem to have a problem with that.
> There has to be nuance. Things that might _literally_ kill people probably shouldn't be reported the in the same way as a bug in a 15-year-old ink-jet printer driver.

The problem is, its actively being exploited. You're just keeping systems and people uninformed and unable to make mitigations.
I view it as a First Amendment issue. We can call out "privileges" that lobbyist groups have that ordinary citizens don't (which as far as I know are not granted by law, they just have to do with the size and influence of the groups). But a lobbyist is just a person or group that voices an opinion to law makers. In theory, literally any individual person can be a "lobbyist" and preventing the practice would prevent people from talking about issues to lawmakers. Which would be the exact opposite of what we would want in a democratic system.
> With the exemption of alarm systems (why?)

I imagine it has to do with integrity of the system. If people start messing with it and leave some sensors unplugged and there's an incident, the first thing survivors are going to do is sue the manufacturer despite having tampered with it.

I'm surprised to see airbags didn't make the list. Some things, amateurs really shouldn't mess with.
You actually can. There have been a ton of fashion lawsuits over copyright, and other IP laws like design patents. Here's a couple:

https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/14/business/shein-rico-lawsuit/i...

https://gouchevlaw.com/fashion-designer-roberto-cavalli-sued...

https://www.lofficielusa.com/politics-culture/fashion-lawsui...
Your concerns about the potential pitfalls of establishing a censorship regime are 100% warranted. However the paradox of tolerance, as described by Karl Popper, is quite relevant here. Popper posited that for a society to remain tolerant, it must have the right to be intolerant of intolerance. This seems contradictory, but the essence is that unchecked tolerance can eventually be exploited by the intolerant, jeopardising the very foundation of a tolerant society. Popper emphasised that the intolerance which shouldn't be tolerated is that which refuses to engage in "rational argument". It's crucial to strike a balance to ensure the preservation of free speech while preventing its misuse.
> Huh? During COVID the US had several eviction moratoriums, which covered non-payment: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_eviction_moratoriums_...

Sure, for the few lucky people in federal housing and the handful of states that implemented their own (the vast majority of which were lifted in less than 6 months). Point is that nearly all homeowners in the US received 18 months of mortgage forebearance immediately.

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/coronavirus/mortgage-forbear...
Worst pun ever, starred.
> I understand the importance of selling. But selling shouldn't be confused with deceiving consumers

Woo boy, someone hasn't taken marketing 101 in uni.
You are correct that your argument is a common one. There is also a common response - the invention and use of artificial fertilizers allowed us to dispense with good land use practices, hammer the land with chemicals to squeeze as much crop out of it as possible, and dramatically raise the amount of crop grown for meats and industrial outputs like corn syrup and ethanol. We have way more crop land than is required to feed our population a healthy diet, we are degrading our soil, and modern farming economics have become so dependent on industrial inputs that farmers in India have committed waves of suicide after becoming so indebted to Monsanto/Bayer that they are unable to imagine any future for themselves.

You are right that we are so dependent on artificial fertilizers that we cannot simply cease production tomorrow, but that only speaks to our dependence on them due to economic and social factors, not their inherent necessity to our ability to feed ourselves. Essentially no one is saying we should shut down all the factories tomorrow so the argument is a dead end.

What many people are saying however, is that we went very far down the wrong road, and we are paying the price today. We must figure out how to bring our farming practices back in to balance with ecology.
Why? The effect of that is that it becomes too expensive to treat that living creature, so it gets euthanized instead. Or just let the creature suffer until it dies on its own.
I agree, Unity did disrupt the game engine experience for the smaller dev and earned their goodwill. Since then they really had provided little reason to continue with Unity other than tradition, and other engines made it easier to engage with or over time simply improved enough to meet the standard that Unity provided. Even before this pricing change you kept hearing the questioning of Unity and their 'edge' was quickly becoming paper thin.
It might have been a conspiracy to commit murder and they did it together.

Basically two criminals, one crime.
For example digital services for essential government services were brought only recently (mynumber). Its decent but ways behind anything in europe. Digital services in general suck in japan, especially banking where the forms and backends cant handle foreign names, so you often have to send snail mail in the end. Faxes are still common place. Lots of stuff is still handled in paper even if they are submitted digitally so many things are painfully slow, especially anything visa/immogration related. With digital cash there are annoying walled garden economies and i could go on.

General stores, restaurant, and public transport work really well however.

I will not touch on societal issues or politics, as everyone has their own view on these matters.
I think in this case the situation for fonts isn't such a bad compromise. As it is, BigTypeCompany can't go kicking LittleIndieDesigner who can't afford to go to court because their letter-A looks confusingly similar.
> I still think Python is Lisp's revenge, after the way it went on AI Winter.

What do you mean?
Idiomdrottning
I agree, only people approved by a central committee should get a chance to speak their mind. This is the only way to build a healthy society like China, Russia, Iran, or North Korea.
Just living without dying is not a good life. If anyone wants to stop suicide they should prevent the root cause that leads to it, not just stop giving a less painful way to do so. It's inhuman and many forced to die horribly because of this. It's always the privileged who decides to make suicide harder.

They think life is always going to be good at after waiting. For many it's not true. Privileged people think just because they themselves have it easier, people who are willing to die just mentally ill and don't know how to enjoy life.

If we are brought to life easily without thinking and no consent, then there should be a way to leave if anyone wants to. Life should not be a one way hell trap, suffering for long time just so that well off people can feel better and not hear about suicide.

Nobody actually does anything to prevent root cause, but it's completely ok for them if people suffer long time without dying. Media will also never show humans whose life is still miserable after not dying. It must be a feel good story.
Any plans for pgvector? Graphana tempo
Those liability laws need to be corrected.

Industrial operators who modify their equipment are not children, they should be responsible for their actions and trusted to repair it.
This has famously already been raised in court during the Rittenhouse trial:

https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/stlr/blog/vi...

And discussed on HN here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29187820
You can make it illegal to do business with FB in EU (sanction it basically). You can seize whatever assets (buildings) or bank accounts they might have here.
You say "society", but in practice its a group of unelected bureaucrats engaging in political censorship and regulatory capture.
This would be excellent. Ticketmaster routinely costs 30-50% more than listed, and is often the only way to get tickets for a show.

And let's not get started on cable companies.
I've commented on this before in a different k8s thread (one about a k8s outage) but something that bears repeating is that the entire job market is Kubernetes.

My personal experience is that it is very, very hard to find a job right now if your professional experience is primarily non-k8s orchestration systems. Most job positions out there require deep Kubernetes knowledge as well as hands-on experience with different supporting products like ArgoCD and Flux.

I chose Nomad for a large initiative at my current employer and it is honestly pretty amazing given the use case but I regret choosing it because I feel like I'm unhirable now given that every devops/SRE/platform engineering position open on the market (each one with hundreds of applicants) is heavily Kubernetes focused.
The time period can't be specified in the link unfortunately. But if you click on the year long button, you can compare to other counties. The average over the last year that I see for Croatia is 366 gCO2eq/kWh.

It's alarming to see how much this diverges from the numbers from Statistica.
What I theorized 10 years ago - balkanization of the internet - a GFW for each country/jurisdiction, and large entities like FAAMG forced to either play ball (and allow country censors), split up their operations, or leave markets.
AI outputs are not necessarily bad for datasets, given they've been verified by a human for their quality and correctness (probably the case here, but not for SEO content farms).
Zuck should just ip-range block the entirety of europe.

>"vigilant" about removing disinformation on his company's platforms during the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict and ahead of upcoming elections.

How can there be an objective truth in a conflict that's been happening for such a long time?
It seems that the Ruby on Rails monolith lasted through 10 years of explosive growth at airbnb. Thats a pretty scalable to me.

FTA it sounds that it wasnt he language of framework that was an issue, but rather the monolith model.
> Who defines what illegal and misinformation mean?

EU regulators.

> The information being false or not is actually irrelevant, it's the process of censorship that's damaging.

> This is because even though humans are impulsive and emotional, we're still rational beings.

uh nope:

"The policy expands Facebook’s rules about what type of false information it will remove, and is largely a response to episodes in Sri Lanka, Myanmar and India in which rumors that spread on Facebook led to real-world attacks on ethnic minorities."

- https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/18/technology/facebook-to-re...