skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Learn core design patterns only:

- Observer patterns => This is your AHA moments !

- Iterator patterns => So that you can use (for item of your_collection) { }

And the mother of all clean code: Monad.

That's it, you hardly need more than those.
It's frustrating because the poster was basically asking if the Wifi of the Pixel 7 was disabled when it is in certain country, but the 'product expert' kept hiding behind the fact that it is currently in an unsupported country without answering the original question.
Well, I don't think employees should be bringing their own laptops to work anyway. It's extremely borderline with phones IMO and they have facilities like work profiles for handling that specifically. But the business should be able to do whatever it thinks necessary with the business's laptops it issues to employees. Sometimes it's even required to legally.
> Anyone external had more influence on company direction than the most experienced employees.

That's one reason why people employ consultants. A consultant is someone an organisation employs to tell it what it already knows. Sometimes it doesn't know that it knows it, but more often it already knows what needs to be done, but an external entity gives a veneer of respectability to grasping a difficult nettle.
Cutting to the chase and sidestepping the medium article, the relevant piece from Einstein centres on:

“The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil.”

Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

from: Why Socialism? (1949) ~ Albert Einstein

https://archive.md/RkAOi

It's an argument against concentrations of power, something that occurs in both authoritarian nations under the guise of "eventually, communism!! (but not right now)" and in republican democracies under the mantra of "at least it's not communism!!".
Hahaha! No, there's no prefix. It's an indivisible whole, and it's an awesome username. The only fad is you. And your time is up.

Are you sure you don't have one of those GPT usernames? I think you might have it "backwards", senor.
I put it on desserts and on to of cocktails. Just make sure you're using 24K.
How do you know that you’re currently at a local low/high?
I'll have to look into how the flow with Authelia exactly looks like. I guess the forward auth flows of Caddy and Traefik shouldn't be too hard to cover. And that's something I'd also want personally: I'm using a similar forward auth mechanism using Traefik, that I currently have turned off because of the app.
The docs of the other integrations of Authelia I have not looked into yet.
Yes.

If you follow me, you tell my my server that you want my posts to be delivered to you.

That means my server has to know your account exists.

I also have to know that you follow me because I can export my followers if I move to a new service.

My server can choose to publicise the relationship. So anyone looking through my social graph will see "fsckboy follows edent".

By default, I believe the current Mastodon software does show that relationship - but only to me, people on my instance, and people on your instance. No one else. I'm happy to be corrected on that though.

In theory, an attacker could scrape the social graph of every user in the entire fediverse and build a list of who you follow from that. I don't think that's a realistic threat.
I’m not talking about personal devices, I think the typically IT policies at large corporations cause more problems than they solve and I think Apple making certain things impossible is a great idea to help push back on these policies: for example, IT should not need on-demand screen recording or key logging access and, especially, should not be able to put such software on an employee’s work laptop without explicit consent on the part of the employee.
Enver Hoxha, the Albanian dictator from 1944 to 1985, also had the habit of having photos altered to remove former allies that fell out of favour and just generally making himself look better, but he's not included in this pdf. To be fair there's probably examples of historical altered photos from any dictator or sufficiently authoritative government after the invention of photography.
I’m using QuickScan on iOS for this, which has customizable favorite export locations so that you with one press after a scan can upload to specific folders in google drive etc.
The anatomy of a smart bulb
> “This is because Power BI tracks usage metrics and almost all dashboards are completely unused.”

Ha-ha… haaa

Yes, I know that feeling all to well: I set up some fancy DevOps thing and then see that the all-time logins are a big fat zero for 70% of the people that should checking the system daily.

This is reality: the DevOps team lead, the entire sysops team, and all but one developer literally never even looking at any of: APM, deployment pipeline, log analytics system, issue tracker, or dashboard.
I'd look for companies led by conscientious founders.
I think Shen (fancy Lisp) has a similar model
Yeah, but what about "On april 19th, I made bread"?

See also https://pastebin.com/tKLSWjSt, which is a collection of Pompei graffiti.
At the start he's doing overtone singing (like this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vC9Qh709gas) but yeah the low bits sound like fry.
I also had another interpretation and thought the title meant a literal film of life, like a microbial bio film. Time to get some sleep!
The problem isn't intelligence, the problem is judgement. Many a smart person has built ridiculous and rickety towers of code, only understandable because they are smart.

Good judgement mostly seems to come from bad judgement, failure, then picking the pieces up again while evaluating the causes. It also seems to require some emotional maturity and humility.

You are correct that the various dogmas are not useful until the mental attitude is right. After then they are superfluous.
It wouldn't be terrible risk management. The value chosen (after many days) is going to converge to being awfully close to the trading volume × 0.0075
I'm not in the position to compare them, as I have never used DevonThink before. You'd also need to compare DevonThink to Paperless-ngx, instead of comparing my iOS app, that is not yet feature complete and which is just one of many clients to access Paperless-ngx.
It's an interesting claim, but the post doesn't even try to support it with any kind of data.
The difficult part was knowing where to sell so you could have money on the sidelines before the market dropped. Was it right when lockdowns started? In that case, you already lost a fair amount from the top.

I do believe that markets can be beat, but by definition, you need to be "smarter" than the average capital, where more than half of the capital in the market on a given day is controlled by somewhat sophisticated investors. I don't think it's worthwhile for a retail trader to try their hand unless they are putting considerable effort into developing their alpha and either have automation skills or exceptional discipline.
+1 would recommend.

Stumbled across this movie as a youngster, very much thanks to a certain iconic scene:

“Burn’s wetware matches her software.”
TBH, if anyone else brought a remotely competent eraser pointer to market, I'd probably consider them. Even the hyperconfigurable Framework doesn't offer one.

Sometimes you can find a random business-line HP or Dell with one, but the Dell one I tried (some 7th generation Core i5 I rode for five years at work) was so terrible, especially on scrolling, that I just plugged in an external mouse, and it's a feature that appears on random models intermittently when it does appear, so it might not meet any of my other (admittedly limited) requirements.
>The tech industry in CA is basically Chinese and Indians.

Funny that you should mention the Chinese. Although China is 91% Han, the Han are themselves very divided by language and regional origin/culture. The emergence of Taiwan added another division to the mix; as I understand it, there are significant tensions between the mainland and Taiwanese Chinese communities in the US. (It would be a surprise if there were none.)

That said, there are zero calls for a need in the US for legal protection of the mainland-born Chinese from Taiwanese, or vice versa.[1] They have (and certainly their children have), in the US, by and large moved beyond such divisions. Just as Catholic and Protestant Irish did so in the US and the rest of the Anglosphere outside the UK and Ireland. I bet that if everyone of South Asian ethnicity in the US were born and raised in the US, there would similarly be zero calls for this law that Newsom vetoed.

You mentioned the Indian dominance of the California tech sector. I know you intend that to be a veiled threat, but that to me says that unwary Americans unnecessarily imported caste divisions en masse in a place where such divisions did not previously exist (and there was and is no shortage of other, preexisting divisions). From this non-Indian, non-Chinese perspective, if (again, if) there is a real problem with caste-based discrimination in the US among South Asians, it seems like South Asians aren't doing as well as the Chinese in terms of assimilation.[2] Is this really the place you want to make a stand on?

[1] Maybe I've overlooked rampant blatant instances of discrimination. But I doubt it.

[2] Again, I am not differentiating between the alleged oppressors and alleged victims. As I have said, their dispute should never have occurred on American soil in the first place. It is not our business and not our concern.
I had not heard about the Merovingian period in Norway, in Sweden this period is called the Vendel period, and I looked it up, it is called differently. Apparently archeological material in Norway from this era often has a French connection.
If you don't have sources, the sensible target is 0. Projects should be funded on an as-makes-sense basis and paid back. Or if you have some reason to pick a different target then sure, do that.

The issue at the moment is that the ratio is trending upwards until something breaks. And debts are hitting levels where not only is it reasonable to expect breakages, but it is also mad to expect that the debt can be repaid. If people keep going the way they are, can you even imagine a realistic scenario where it ends well? People are relying on a McConnell-Schumer-Trump-Biden-No Speaker-in-the-House controlled system to take a situation where everyone is acting unreasonably and suddenly start behaving with fiscal prudence. That is unlikely. It is more likely that catastrophic consequences will happen first, then courses will be changed.

I don't think there are even questions of rhetoric at this point, it looks to me like all the decisions have been locked in. I mean, they may as well bump up the budget for science at this point, why not. Great thing to spend money on. But where are the resources supposed to come from? The system is already in crisis and gridlock.
Where can I buy one of these
lots of people beg to differ.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b15-P12gIf0&t=80s&pp=2AFQkAI...

[its bond/connery with the fry]
> A commit is not a snapshot and a patch. It is literally only a snapshot.

When you do cherry-pick, you supply a commit id, but actually a patch (diff between the commit and its parent) is applied. So yes, commit (/id) can mean a patch in some cases.
While I agree with the general principle of the post, I am skeptical of the fact that schwab published it. If it was done third party research, I would trust it more.

(Internet has made me skeptical)

However, the only incentive I can think of schwab is to encourage people to invest ASAP they have cash so schwab can get that money in their system so they can charge fees/still services.

But that’s just normal business
And go where? Apartheid Israel has them interned with nowhere to go.
While I always hate the cluttering of "top" directories, id think something more like `.gitignore.local` at the top level would be much better than where its hidden
It is possible to borrow against BTC (and many other crypto) holdings. This means you don't have to sell. Lend your BTC, earns a bit interest. Borrow your local currency at some rate and within a comfortable liquidation ratio. Spend the local currency on what you want to buy. Earn from your job. Pay back the loan. Keep thing thing you bought. Now you're putting your store of value to work for you and the daily swings in BTC price become less important. No need to go to anyone for permission to do that either. No credit checks. No banks. Anywhere in the world.
I wonder how apple manages their fleet. It would amuse me to no end to discover their own ops team is equally frustrated at the state of macOS.
No. This is absolutely a zombie chain.
Test username: guest Test password: guest_2022

Enjoy.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37807009
>That means my server has to know your account exists.

That doesn't mean your server has to share my data without checking my prefs. If the community is privacy conscious, and it works this way, they're idiots. Taking the attitude "well, a bad actor could share your data anyway, so we'll just have everybody share it anyway" is not privacy conscious at all.
For just $4 more you can buy the Atari ST version!
In the article, Peter Perfect has perfect market timing, but only buys once.

Petra Perfect also has perfect market timing, but can buy and sell repeatedly.
I disagree. I've lived through various levels of programming languages and it makes me appreciate features in languages that, these days, are just taken for granted.

I've got a few vintage BASIC machines now and some of the code for those machines is almost unreadable. What struck me now that didn't when I was kid was kind of how much like assembly language BASIC can be in some of these computers. On machines with very limited RAM but plenty of ROM, BASIC acts like compression allowing you to write much more complex programs than you could actually fit in RAM if you did everything in machine code. And, like assembly, being terse and clever can result in better performance and smaller code.

I'm considering writing a BASIC-to-BASIC compiler for these machines that works something like a JavaScript minifier.
You purposefully left off the end of the sentence? You know, the part about regulation? Cause nowhere in the article does it say they are trying to stop retired generals from taking these jobs, just that they would like to regulate it to prevent conflicts of interest. I get the feeling that maybe you haven’t read the article yet?
There is so much to be said for KISS, especially when you have to do an interface for "everyone" and not just a bunch of tech-savvy STEM people
Why the haze has reached Singapore's shores again
> [...]

As per my last reply, I don't believe further debate of this point would be productive. We've both made our arguments. I'm comfortable letting mine stand on their own merits.

If you'd like to start a meta-discussion about this discussion, and any grievances therein, I'll happily participate if we can keep it civil. I think understanding why and how debates can breakdown at the limits (and what those limits are) provides real value in avoiding such breakdowns in the future.

> Thanks for making my point clearer and adding interesting technical references to back it up. You have provided the sources to back up my claims.

I am glad to have made a positive impact on you in some small way, at least.

> Totally unnecessary and uncalled for. You have repeatedly accused me of bad faith which lowers the discussion to a childish level of vindictive garbage. You were not making your point clear before and I was making the effort to respond sincerely to that, trying explain what I thought you misunderstood. It seems that you are still confused and are arguing my point for me without realizing it.

In the spirit of the above, if you are being sincere: I must genuinely urge you to consider why someone might believe your arguments to be unsatisfactory, and how charitable it is not to only consider incoherent formulations of the arguments of others. Put simply: if you see someone's argument as trivially unsound, is it possible you have misunderstood their position?

If you're admitting that you did not understand my argument with sufficient clarity to contest it, on what grounds can you claim to know what I've misunderstood in the making of it? My claim follows from this line of reasoning. You are, necessarily, by your own admission, arguing against a strawman.
So if you ever go on holiday, its safer not to buy a google pixel? Who comes up with these dumb ideas.
Corporations from the perspective of most employees are communists dictatorships.

Think about it: you use a communal means of production, distribute profits centrally, and you don’t get to vote for who gets to be your manager.
This always seemed like a very interesting project; we need to get to the point where, if things can run in parallel, they must run in parallel to make software more efficient on modern cpu/gpu.

It won't attract funds, I guess, but it would be far more trivial to make this work with an APL or a Lisp/Scheme. There already is great research for APL[0] and looking at the syntax of HVM-core it seems it is rather easy to knock up a CL DSL. If only there were more hours in a day.

[0] https://github.com/Co-dfns/Co-dfns
That's more of an indictment of the field of economics than anything else. The most talented leave to make better money in markets and hedge funds and the remaining academics get to set our public policy. There are plenty of consistently performing funds. Successful "applied economists" include Ray Dalio and Jim Simons.
This is a good example of why you shouldn't listen to the Hacker News peanut gallery, because it is about as silly as you originally implied it was; a tiny bit of documentation reading will let you know you can check out as many worktrees into different directories as you like.

I would advise you to instead eliminate class prejudice from your writing. A common type of class prejudicial remark programmers make is sniping at "spreadsheets", i.e., the programming tools of the outgroup not initiated into nonsensical programmer esoterica, aren't those nonprogrammers benighted and silly? But really, spreadsheets are so valuable to them because they're one of the only ways they can tell a computer (a machine that ostensibly serves them) what to do without interacting with the priesthood.

But you shouldn't listen to me either. I'm just some fucking moron on a website. Please understand this.
Company does look onto this. And those queries have pretty much zero results and just waste additional money.
Hmm I have seen a lot of wordpress and especially the plugins tend to be very hit and miss when it comes to stability and updates.

It's pretty bad and it really means you have to constantly update them to be reasonably secure. There's a whole service for scanning its vulnerabilities: https://wpscan.com/

Of course every other product has vulnerabilities too but they are not that easily and heavily exploited.
The linked-to literature review considers it a relevant paper. Take up your controversial issue with Dan Luu.

> not the same as writing a program in a language you know is typed and which you design the types first before constructing the program

You know that's not the only way to work with static types, right?

Furthermore, the same DRuby paper hypothesizes "that programmers have ways of reasoning about types that compensate for the lack of static type information". It suggests that programmers are designing with types first, in their head, even in programming languages which don't support types.

So I think you meant to write something more like "express" or "implement" the types first, not "design."
Yes, engineering team.
Smart programmers don't need any of this shit.
Not quite because the US actually strongly opposes the security guarantee in the negotiations. Saudi wants it.

Agree that they raise oil prices to suit themselves, and are generally a shite ally. Jared getting $2b by abusing the White House positions is very sad too.
To go into further detail about systemic investing:

There have been experiments like the turtle traders ^ 1 who applied "trend following", used today by many CTAs on exotic markets. For this, an investor taught some people his strategy/rules, gave them his money and they've shined for 40 years. The fundamental strategy still works today (updated). Fundamentally, it's a method to ride momentum in different ways (e.g. crossectional.) Hedge fund managers like Rzepczynski, Cem Karsan, Alan Beer... Richard Brennan is the most insightful of them who shares his methods freely. N.b. trend following doesn't work well in stock markets, but flourishes in Mexican rate swaps, orange juice futures, London sugar... combined in ensembles.

Traditional value investors, building on the Intelligent Investor, have always done well over samples above a few years. (N.b. Warren Buffet hasn't been a value investor for a long time, because he has too much to manage. He was strongly inspired by Fisher's Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits, which gave us the concept of "growth stocks".) (N.b. 2, value investing ETFs are mostly terrible, fundamentally not investing in value stocks due to their structures.)

Carisle's Acquierer's Multiple is the most recent development in systemic value investing (he also runs an ETF or two along these lines). "Magic formula investing" even holds up too!

In the mining space, you also get discretionary (not purely systematic) investors like Rick Rule openly discussing their methodologies, successful for decades and decades.

Here’s an interesting paper ^ 2 (exec summary pages 5-6). Note that 70% of underperformance is due to investors withdrawing funds during times of market crisis. Fund fees also drive the majority of underperformance. N.b. most wealth managers can't legally follow such strategies because of the prudent person rule. They are legally forced to underperform typical indices - and the majority of research has focused on them, distorting the data pool.

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/08/turtle-trad...

[2] https://wealthwatchadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Q...
I would think the U should be "understandable"?
My personal background is that I’ve lived in airbnbs for >3 yrs full time around the pandemic.

Early in my experience, I had the internet crap out at one place and the host wasn’t responsive to fixing it, so I petitioned Airbnb support to cancel my reservation.

They did so on the grounds that I had happened to ask the host about the quality of their WiFi prior to booking and was assured that it would be solid.

Since then, I always make a point to give the host a minor 3rd degree about the WiFi quality prior to booking, and have gone years without major trouble.

Hotel WiFi reliability has improved greatly during that time, but I need some sort of explicit guarantee from them before I would make the transition to more hotel stays.