skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
QUIC is roughly TCP-equivalent not HTTP-equivalent, and we do have a BSD sockets API for TCP. You might be thinking of HTTP/3 rather than QUIC; HTTP/3 actually is HTTP-equivalent.

You can turn the OP's question around. Every modern OS kernel provides an efficient, shared TCP stack. It isn't normal to implement TCP separately in each application or as a userspace library, although this is done occasionally. Yet we currently expect QUIC to be implemented separately in each application, and the mechanisms which are in the OS kernel for TCP are implemented in the applications for QUIC.

So why don't we implement TCP separately in each application, the way it's done with QUIC?

Although there were some advantages to this while the protocol was experimental and being stabilised, and for compatibility when running new applications on older OSes, arguably QUIC should be moved into the OS kernel to sit alongide TCP now that it's stable. The benefit of having Chrome, Firefox et al stabilise HTTP/3 and QUIC were good, but that potentially changes when the protocol is stable but there are thousands of applications, each with their own QUIC implementation doing congestion control differently, scheduling etc, and no cooperation with each other the way the OS kernel does with TCP streams from concurrent applications. Currently we are trending towards a mix of good and poor QUIC implementations on the network (in terms of things like congestion control and packet flow timing), rather than a few good ones as happens with TCP because modern kernels all have good quality implementations of TCP.
The only way this would come up for me is in the area of performance problems and as a way to try to provide accommodations if necessary. Definitely seems weird for it to be a standard question. If you've built up enough of a relationship with folks, they will tend to share these kinds of details. Folks who prefer it remains private won't. That's perfectly okay as long as work is getting done.
Bit longer than that. BBC has a good graph actually. Goes back to 1940.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-67017021
Question - Does it knowing what the style of Pixar is and knowing to read it constitute trademark infringement instead?
> For example, it is not a violation of copyright for you to make many copies of a movie for personal use.

This likely varies by jurisdiction, but in the United States, copyright law covers four exclusive rights:

1. The right to make copies

2. The right to distribute copies

3. The right to create derivative works

4. The right to publicly perform the work

Making copies for personal use absolutely violates the first of these exclusive rights.
Cambly | San Francisco, USA | Hybrid/Onsite | Full Time

About Cambly: Our mission is to bring high-quality English education to every English learner in the world at the touch of a button. Think of us as the Airbnb that matches English students with English tutors and come help us build the world’s largest English school.

We are hiring: Engineering Manager, Staff Backend Engineer

Life @Cambly includes:
-Cash Flow Positive for the greater part of 6 years
-Hybrid First Company (M, T, Th)
-Catered Lunches
-100% of Medical, Dental, and Vision paid along with matching 401k
-Maternity and Paternity Paid Leave
-20 days of true, unbothered PTO
-End-of-year shutdown
-Family-friendly environment with amazing WLB and Culture
-Helping others around the world unlock economic opportunities by learning English

Apply here: https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/Cambly
“What music do you like?”
So is it analogous to how a CNN starts with fragments of images and further up the chain assembles these into objects?
Your beef is with Google and the Chrome team, then. QUIC itself is a good protocol, and at the library level you can just tell it to trust any cert it sees.

Google doesn't need to enable QUIC to disable self-signed certs in Chrome.
Yeah. Who needs a usable RF spectrum when iphone has interwebs?
That sort of black pilled nihilism is how the terrible win. Plenty is good, plenty is worth fighting for.
For those who don't believe in the Bible or Christianity:
If the Ark was found (and verified somehow), would it change your mind?

The Ark itself fascinates me 1) as a Christian and 2) well, look at my name :)
Why support and belonging are the final key to developer thriving
Author here. FWIW I wasn't intending this to make it onto HN, having posted about this on Lemmy looking for beta testers. The current version of the app is very much a preview. There's much further work to be done and this will include as far as possible ensuring Bitmagnet is a "good citizen". The suggestions made on the GH issue look largely feasible and I'll get round to looking at them as soon as I can.

The issue and my response on GH: https://github.com/bitmagnet-io/bitmagnet/issues/11
I live in the US. I keep a couple thousand dollars in cash at home for emergencies, and in my part of the US if the power went out there are a number of stores that could continue operating.
My point is simply these models should not ingest copyrighted materials without paying the authors or publishers. Litigating end-users who are using LLMs that have ingested pirated copyrighted would be so complex as to not be worth it except for large businesses.
If I want to ingest/read a book I need to pay money but if an LLM does it they’re free to pirate the book? Why?

And why is it that I pay OpenAI to generate data based off books it stole for free when I had to pay money for the same book.

I know what I am actually paying for is the model obviously but it just feels extra wrong to be paying a company for a service it’s built using pirated content.
My argument is that the modes are somewhere between your JPEG example and "artists' brains" example. Now legally, it's usually not the bytes themselves that matter, but their colour (provenance). But this doesn't make the case of AI models any more clear - the training process is also somewhere between zipping up a folder full of JPEGs, and a human practicing their art through fuck ton of repetitive reproductions of existing works until they grok the style.
The financial sector, which creates the traps and treadmills, has to be reoriented toward sustainability instead of growth.

Without that structural change people will keep falling into holes, no matter what drugs or advice they are given.

Selling them things they cant afford. Giving them credit they cant repay. Inflating prices artificially. Brainwashing kids in bschools that scale and market capture are the goal. All this has to stop.

It is the cause of so much runaway mindlessness. People have forgotten how many were involved (homeowners, lenders, banks, insurers, investors, investment banks, ratings agencies, regulators, central banks) in the 2008 meltdown. Include the 20 year wars and the whole population has been through some serious trauma that hasnt been properly processed yet.
Kudos to the team! I'm almost sad that I'm not working anymore on a Battery Management System, requiring functional safety, as I was considering transitioning from C to Rust and that's how I came to learn about Ferrocene :)
Clip Studio Paint. I highly doubt any of them even knows .xcf (I didn't ask tho).
iPhone 15 Pro overheating resolved: Thermal photos before and after iOS 17.0.3
Zero-days for hacking WhatsApp are now worth millions of dollars
That's a fine ethical argument for progress, and copyright law is indeed about encouraging the arts and sciences alike, but OpenAI is trying to specifically make an argument about "Fair Use", which does consider whether the new work obviates the old one and prevents those original authors from being compensated since people will just buy the new one instead.

What OpenAI is offering is a commercial product that obseletes an entire industry of creative output - why pay any author or songwriter a dime from here on out? Just pay 19.99/month to OpenAI.

If that's progress in technology, great, but they're arguing that the training data and subsequent transformation is "fair use" - that the original authors get no say and no compensation.

I'd be all for commercializing the collective works of humanity if we got to redistribute the profits to those producers who actually made the superintelligence possible (ie, everyone) but whats not cool is a single commercial entity taking the worlds' copyrighted work and turning a profit from it without a single dime in due compensation.
That hasn’t been my experience. ReScript and Elm are much better compared to the fragile types I’ve encountered with Typescript (where I needed to write code to do the type checking). Happy if you’ve found something that works for you though.
Meta Quest 3 convinced me to love VR by downplaying the metaverse
The song is distinct from an artists performance of that song, but let’s move outside of music to books etc.

Suppose A creates an epic poem, B does a poetry reading aka a performance of A’s poem. C records it, then plays that recording back in public. D reinterprets the poem making a new public performance. B can successfully sue C but not necessarily D if it’s sufficiently distinct. A however can potentially sue D, C, and B if none of them got the rights. [Substitute A making a painting and B making some needlepoint copy or whatever and the same principle applies.]

This is why JK Rawling got paid by the people making Harry Potter movies, she could sue if they didn’t pay. Trademarks may also be involved, but even without that if you want to make an MMORPG based on The Dresden Files or whatever be prepared to fork over cash. Unless you follow the Disney approach and use public domain works.
It makes sense to me that even if there was an Ark, they almost certainly disassembled it for homes.
The main thing it would get is 2x faster loading on high latency networks (because the TLS handshake happens with the same packets as the QUIC handshake).
No, and that's due to 2 reasons.

1. The malware was a rootkit for Windows

2. Windows has an interesting "feature" that will blindly auto-install software that is embedded in a certain location in the BIOS. If a rootkit is placed there, Windows will always try and install it.

It's bad for Lenovo, but it's also bad that Windows has this anti-feature.
It’s not hard to verify before throwing shade at OP’s work. 1) article specifically mentions the actual frequencies used by wireless charging up top, 2) you can refer to Wikipedia to see the same [0]: the frequency for charging is the much lower From 87-205 KILOhertz (while the harmful frequencies being filtered out are in the hundreds of MEGAhertz).

So, no, this doesn’t slow down charging.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_charging
i think even the tiny, model jet engines used in radio control planes are both very hot, and move lots of air. both of which are hard to tame to the point of making them comfortable to coexist with on a city street in large herds.

I still want one. direct the exhaust forward, dump in a little extra fuel, and instant snowblower / flamethrower. Makes that pesky crosswalk crowd just melt away.
>We just need to develop the tech to access it

What energy

What "tech"?

Tech isn't magic. We can't just magically stop the greenhouse effect.
Having an ICE that drives a generator (alternator?) to power a traction motor(s), without being mechanically linked to the drivetrain, is how diesel locomotives operate. I believe the concept also has been (is being?) explored for linehaul trucks. But I'm not sure what constraints there are on passenger vehicles though... I'm also curious.

If I had to guess, I would bet that the constraints are more commercial than physical... hybrids are already very efficient, so the market for such a vehicle would probably not justify the engineering costs. But that's just a guess!
Reading about how these are generally made of an even number of cars reminded me of this[1].

[1] https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd05xx/EWD594.PDF
BGP was already creaking under exponential growth effects under v4. It was the opinion of engineers deeper in that than me that BGP as it stood wouldn't have supported the weight of routes beyond 32-bits without massive tables that would not scale well at all. BGP was considered to be on the list of things that drastically needed to change as the address space expanded. (Again, you don't have to take my word for it, the IETF notes are of the various debates are generally public and so are the resulting RFCs.)

You are doing a lot of magic heavy lifting in "You'd update BGP and the routers" as if there was a way to do that with a "small point update", especially once you realize how much firmware and hardware was always the issue that needed changing; updating IP was never an easy software-only problem. Just because you think you can imagine it doesn't mean it was technically feasible, especially at internet scale. Engineers spent years exploring options before they arrived at the IPv6 proposals. The space/memory inefficiency of v4 BGP was one of the problems they had to address. Sure, they felt a need to address it with a brand new protocol with less resemblance to BGP than some would have liked, but that wasn't because they were a priori trying to make life more difficult for everyone: they wanted devices to be able to route IPv6 without needing GBs to TBs of RAM just for routes and were afraid that "just use good old BGP but massively extended with a larger address space" was going to go that way and possibly quickly.
Running CMake at Scale with Remote Execution
The purpose and character of their use, the infringing use, not the purpose and character of the original.

The rest of that segment is "including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;"

And then you go on to say "context is essential" while using the text of the law to justify your opinion. The "full historical use and interpretation of that text in regards to other sets of facts" has shown that original purpose has little to no bearing on trying to claim fair use.

Also, the list is not exhaustive. Those factors are considered, but they're not the entire test. Even the purposes themselves are examples, not an exhaustive list.

So why the original was created has no bearing on whether or not you've infringed copyright.

Their main thrust however seems to be that they're metaphorically making paper mache whales from shredded copies of whale books. Yes, the entire text of Moby Dick is on that whale, but it is not Moby Dick, you can't extract Moby Dick from it, you couldn't even tell Moby Dick was used in its entirety.

Which is a much better argument than "bruh, we gave it to a computer".
Why do people keep giving them money?!

Because a lot of people actually seem to like Windows more than MacOS or Linux. Companies seem to find Office 365 a better deal than what Google offers. Also, and much more important, there is a whole world of software out there that is Windows only and for which there is no Linux/Mac alternative.
Does the model even have enough information to be able to _know_ that though? If it's simply using probability to ties a series of tokens together into text based on numerical probability, that doesn't store enough information to understand that _this specific sequence of tokens_ represents come specific copyrighted work. Storing that information would _actually_ seem to fall afoul of copyright.

The fact that it can spit out chunks of copyrighted works is driven by the input token sequence and the model weights pointing to a specific path that have an ever so slightly higher probability of being the expected output, right? It's not like the model stores the copyrighted work directly.

(Yes, I know the algorithms are more complex than what I expressed, but the general idea holds in my understanding)
Expect more copies
https://archive.ph/UZAOk
>Nothing in "fair use" is about the new work making money or not.

This is completely wrong, at least in the US. It is explicitly laid out in the law that whether the new work is commercial vs. not for profit/educational is one of four factors to consider in deciding whether or not it's fair use.
Singapore is super modern futuristic place, while Monaco is just a tiny city with no infrastructure, but a dock for yachts, casinos, restaurants and some mountains. I don’t know much about Monaco (visited once), but it feels like a place to invent some laws and install money laundering schemes, or tax evasion, or whatever else similar. Singapore on the other hand feels like super futuristic utopian dream city. I lived shortly there, but not long enough to dive into local culture and meet many people. While I would like to come visit Singapore again and again, I see no point in visiting Monaco ever again, for me it’s just beyond boring.
You can add trusted CAs to your system though...
If they are not exclusive to JS or TS, and you're trying to explain why "Nue is written with plain JavaScript", I'd simply remove points 1 and 2, and only keep 3.
okay, yeah definitely watch out for that

I see the same arguments applied to already free, open source, copyleft licensed models
"The fair use of a copyrighted work [...] for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;

(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."

-- 17 U.S. Code § 107 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107)

I don't know how one can read this as an impartial observer and make an honest argument that OpenAI is in the right.

Their use of copyrighted material does not fit any of the purposes enumerated in the first paragraph; it fails criteria #1 because it is of a commercial nature; it fails criteria #2 because it includes all kinds of works; it fails criteria #3 because it's not limited to very small extracts; and it fails at criteria #4 because their products are already having an obvious effect on the market.
I think they all wanted to, but did not want to be the first. I don't recall who the first was, but then they all did in quick succession
Nokia Starts Making Phones in Hungary
Awesome, thanks! Will look into those recommendations.
Yes, and the Navy replaced it with something just as dumb --- the green camo that the army uses.

https://www.ibtimes.com/navy-uniform-changes-why-aquaflage-d...

You're on a ship in the middle of the ocean ... wearing a uniform designed to help you hide in a forest. Apparently, they're intent on justifying "military intelligence" as an oxymoron.
Show HN: Dittofeed v0.5.0 – Self-host SMS and email customer messaging
Hey HN, we’ve just released Dittofeed v0.5.0, with the primary change being the addition of SMS as a messaging channel. Dittofeed is an open source (MIT licensed) omnichannel customer engagement platform, similar to Customer.io and Iterable. We added:

- Twilio-based SMS messaging. You can create SMS templates and customer journeys within Dittofeed.

SMS is a great channel for B2C software companies, looking to engage with their users. For example, e-commerce businesses commonly use SMS to support checkout flows.

We'll be making further enhancements to Dittofeed's SMS support in the coming weeks!

- We added a new "Trait Exists" segmentation option, which can be used to create a segment of all users with phone numbers, for example.

- We made some fairly large improvements to our settings UI. Big shout out to our contributor! https://github.com/promisetochi

The full feature release blog post can be found here: https://dittofeed.com/blog/release-0-5-0.

Looking forward to your thoughts and feedback!

Github Repo - https://github.com/dittofeed/dittofeed

Demo - https://demo.dittofeed.com/dashboard/journeys

Docs - https://docs.dittofeed.com/getting-started
Depending on what you're looking for, a _lot_ more is being published by the Library of Congress as Linked Data nowadays, including LoC classification and subject headings. Check out https://id.loc.gov/.
Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Hummer from the early 2000’s is setup like this — 100mpg with bio-diesel. I think this is the original article I read about his car’s creator, Johnathan Goodwin, from years ago.

https://www.autoblog.com/amp/2007/10/20/biodiesel-turbine-su...
The point I was trying to illustrate is that our legal system needs to change from one that is focused on punishment to one that is focused on rectifying the problem, for non-violent, reversible crimes like plaigarism.

When the legal system can make that change, it becomes a non-issue.
> farting casually introduced in mainstream movies

That could actually be pretty funny.
Nice landing page. I love markdown, very easy to write and move between applications. I also decided to use it in a similar way, but only for the blog [0] section of my websites.

[0]: https://github.com/Cristy94/markdown-blog
Makes sense that a transformer is transformative lol
It's against their TOS, but if you don't sign the TOS and take the data from another source then of course you can.
Their guinea pig may cohabit or socialise with non Guinea pigs. Eg rabbits
I'm not really worried about state actors that don't have state sponsored industrial espionage.
When you have millions of users, and your product has inherent danger, you can't assume the liability for all of them. (hammers and nails anyone?) The only reason that Microsoft has agreed to be liable for their users copyright stuff is because they know this case is a winner for OpenAI and that it does indeed meet merit for fair use. They wouldn't do that to 'be nice,' because not even microsoft can foot the bill for millions of users being sued. Their only alternative would be to not produce the product.
Potentially, though the flood tale isn't unique to Christianity. Many tales in the Bible can be correlated with history, especially the parts that take place in the Roman Empire (even the existence of Yeshua ben Yosef), but correlation doesn't prove the spiritual elements.
> Astronaut James Irwin, the eighth person to walk on the Moon, experienced a religious epiphany during the Apollo 15 mission in 1971. The following year, he resigned from NASA and founded an evangelical organization, the High Flight Foundation. During his outreach work, Irwin met Eryl Cummings in 1976 and expressed interest in joining one of his expeditions in search of Noah's Ark.

Seeing our vulnerable blue planet floating through space must trigger some primordial fear of annihilation, as this seems to be a common experience among astronauts.
How verified are we talking about? Verified that it's a boat with similar measurements from the time period, verified that there was a global flood and the only survivors were on board?
Will Rishi Sunak's plan to ban smoking in UK work?