skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://web.archive.org/web/20231007001402/https://www.sfchr...
The problem, of course, being that some players will just read the raw bytes from the disc without even attempting to decrypt them, and then anyone can decrypt them in software using any other keys even if the player used to read the disc was revoked.

Then every time another player's keys are published it allows anyone to use the older player to read discs using the newer player's leaked keys. And some players are cracked but the keys aren't published, instead they use them to extract the disc key for every new disc and then publish all the disc keys, which can be used in the same way without revealing which player was cracked.
Honestly, for all the praise about Apple's "great UIs", in feels like over the past 10 years or so they got addicted to all these "hidden" action entry points: long presses, random swipes in every direction, and weird menu locations (I for the life of me have no idea why the "install to home page" button for a PWA website is in the "share" action screen).
A premium-lite offering is what’s missing for me to subscribe. The Australia cost of premium is at least $21.99 and there’s no opt out for the music offering which I will never use, making it bad value compared to an ad blocker.

About $12 is all I’m willing to spend per month given the much lower content consumption compared to even prime video for me, and that includes Amazon prime for about $12 anyway.

I bring this up because the article mentions Youtube seems to have killed that off, which I suspect will drive more ad blocker usage rather than more people switching to full premium.
It's not bad actually, I have plundered a number of things from Doom
Yes, at the primitive mamallian or premamallian level..
Is there a reason discussion around C is phrased like this? My reaction to that quote is, "yeah it could possibly have some issues we're not really sure of, but it seems reasonably battle-tested too". It evokes a bit of mixed signal messaging, to me at least.
I also want to pay for this as a future jobseeker for two reasons: one, I want a platform like this to focus on me as the client, and two, I want it to exist.

But what Grimburger says is also important - employers will hate your platform if it will become spam city.

If a platform helped me track my applications CRM-style and automate some of the process, especially scheduling interviews, I would gladly pay LinkedIn bucks for it.
The BIOS on PS1 consoles also had visualizations when playing audio CDs.
Quality of what compared to who? Tiktok is winning.
I hear System76 has some decent machines that don't have to stomach the cost of a Windows license.

I believe Dell also offers a variant of the Dell XPS that is cheaper for having Linux?
I wouldn’t say ROCm code is “slower”, per se, but in practice that’s how it presents. References:

https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm

https://github.com/OpenNMT/CTranslate2

You know what’s missing from all of these and many more like them? Support for ROCm. This is all before you get to the really wildly performant stuff like Triton Inference Server, FasterTransformer, TensorRT-LLM, etc.

ROCm is at the “get it to work stage” (see top comment, blog posts everywhere celebrating minor successes, etc). CUDA is at the “wring every last penny of performance out of this thing” stage.

In terms of hardware support, I think that one is obvious. The U in CUDA originally stood for unified. Look at the list of chips supported by Nvidia drivers and CUDA releases. Literally anything from at least the past 10 years that has Nvidia printed on the box will just run CUDA code.

One of my projects specifically targets Pascal up - when I thought even Pascal was a stretch. Cue my surprise when I got a report of someone casually firing it up on Maxwell when I was pretty certain there was no way it could work.

A Maxwell laptop chip. It also runs just as well on an H100.

THAT is hardware support.
I don't know what world you live in, but this is a problem for any software development.

You need to ensure that there is only one version of any library used globally throughout the code and that the set of versions is compatible with each other, and preferably you also want everything to be built against the same toolchain with the same flags.

That usually means onboarding third-party libraries into your own build system.
Restrict your SSH login to a single user, then su to your admin
Windows 11 Enterprise here. For home use.
Can the market absorb this? If feels like it’s already saturated plus we have the steady stream of new grads. I do not envy anyone who has to look for a job right now
A savvy attacker is going to make sure they don’t leave traces on the device that they exploited it.
Please don't make this normal it's absolutely tiresome to get codes for every single task
Unless it is a Toyota eg Corolla which last much longer than 10 years.
I totally agree! Like using what you've already learned as a scaffold that you can then climb higher on. I don't think you should limit stuff with that, but that you can then go further is great!

Yes, but I also think your example, is unintentionally more nuanced than intended perhaps--in that evolution being a thing does not preclude intelligent design. The simple counter is we are already intelligently designing new organisms which themselves were developed at least in part, and continue to develop, at least in part, through the contribution of evolution.

I think that's also a nuanced point: once you learn one thing, and it has good explanatory power, it doesn't have to be the only thing in operation.

We can take that further and say, it's possible that humans are the product of intelligent design to some extent. One way to phrase that is: ETs manipulated DNA in already evolving primates to create homo sapiens sapiens
> Many sites like Google including my banking sites send me an email when a new IP / location is used for login

All of whom I already mentioned in the comment you are responding to
Ugh, if you can simply replace getaddrinfo, I'd be sold. That shit is nuts.
The main idea behind "AI" is not to make our lives easier. Instead, it is a good weapon to blackmail workers for abandoning whatever rights they still have.
Documented source code for Elite on the NES
> You can't use the types in runtime so all that effort you put into the types doesn't actually translate when you want to use the type system to full effect.

This isn't really the problem: runtime types would solve the issue, but they're a sledgehammer with all sorts of nasty effects elsewhere. Languages with far stronger type systems than F# still have type erasure: it's actually fairly unusual in that regard.

The core weakness of TS (aside from the fact that its "type" system isn't actually sound) is that it doesn't have type-directed emit: you can't automatically generate safe parsers, for instance, because you can't generate anything. Except enums: why those got a pass is beyond me.
It's exposed as "new IP" to the end user but it hides a lot of logic about ISP IP address pools for specific regions, behaviour of other devices, etc. For someone like Google, that's easy to pull off, as a lot of people use it, and people use it daily. But it's harder to get this technology for someone like 23andMe where people log in less often, and its product has low penetration of internet users.
I teach text processing to linguistics students who usually have had zero programming experience. I start by introducing regular expressions in the environment of a text editor. The students take quickly to the declarative nature of regexes and become excited by the power of automation.

Moving on to scripting in a language is hard. I would prefer awk, but I usually have to introduce R, because that is what "everyone" is using these days. When faced with the complexity of a full language, most students lose their enthusiasm and never touch programming again after their thesis.

You can accomplish quite a lot with a powerful text editor and just regexes. I think it would be better for most students to just stick with that.
Advanced cybercrimals occasionally do this on Android at least.
This thread is about vulnerability of older iOS versions to attacks which have been patched in newer iOS versions. Many such attacks have been found by Citizen Lab forensic investigations of political targets. The repo above contains 5 years of IOCs (traces) + forensic reports. Some IOCs can be used with MVT:

Mobile Verification Toolkit (MVT) is a tool to facilitate the consensual forensic analysis of Android and iOS devices, for the purpose of identifying traces of compromise. It has been developed and released by the Amnesty International Security Lab in July 2021 in the context of the Pegasus Project along with a technical forensic methodology. It continues to be maintained by Amnesty International and other contributors.

> they don’t leave traces on the device that they exploited

Some very expensive zero-day attacks, patched by Apple, DID leave traces/IOCs.

Some older iOS devices (e.g. iPhone 7) can be jailbroken with checkra1n due to an unpatchable bootrom bug, i.e. they are better for forensic analysis than a newer device.
Thanks! Not at the moment, but you're the second user asking about it today so that definitely bumps it up on the priority list.
Horrendous, but the nice side effect... the more China, Russia, and other totalitarian states double down on these efforts, the easier it is to argue against them in the West.
Have a half dozen Google Docs open at once and you could force an 8gb machine to start swapping. Just saying.
I appreciate stories like this, they are the memento mori of startups.
Snap AI chatbot investigation launched in UK over teen-privacy concerns
They were talking about Blazor. You're talking about dotnet as a whole.

I agree with them on Blazor and I agree with you on dotnet (e.g. WebAPI) too. The two positions aren't mutually exclusive.

Being a Blazor developer will definitely be career limiting. I'd take almost any other skill set on a new hire (e.g. Angular, React, .Net MVC, Java, et al). The only thing it may beat is Web Forms/Visual Basic, because at least you'll know modern C# syntax. But I'm not allowing Blazor in any codebase I control.
Or attach the inputs on the CCD silicon to something other than the CCD array.
I expect meta will continue with layoffs. Threads appears to be a flop, their metaverse and AR initiatives don’t seem to be gaining much stream either.
Is it a norm? I view all forms of having more than one significant other as being forms of poly. Office spouse, mistress, side boyfriend, sexting other people, etc. I think poly relationships are very common.

If you want to quote from the Bible:

But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

So even looking at porn or thinking sexual thoughts about anyone else is engaging in a poly relationship. By that standard, nearly everyone is in a poly relationship.
It hasn't worked for Twitch, I doubt it'll work for YouTube.
This comment isn't saying anything. It says "LLMs statistically choose the next token" and, because of that, it can't be anything else.

We know how the LLMs were trained, so re-stating it doesn't help in anything. The point is that after the LLMs are trained they behave in certain ways and it can be helpful to say something about how it behaves.

For example, we can talk about how a linear regression can or cannot capture the causal effect of X1 over Y. "It's not capturing the causal effect. It's just minimizing the squared error" is an unhelpful statement.
> That's not asking directly. It's vague. It's ambiguous. It's lazy. It's a cover for not having taken the time to prepare for the meeting (read: interview).

I beg to differ. I think the more ambiguous the question to start with, the wider the field of possible followups. Perhaps project Y is something that the candidate is more excited about than project X, and maybe had a bigger role in.

I believe that, in a friendly setting, one can pick up a lot of information about the candidate's ability to work with ambiguity, from the clarity with which they have organized their thoughts, the concision with which they have presented it, their humility about their contribution, about the things that excited them. Or lack thereof. The interviewer need not be familiar with the details of that project to pick up on this.
> Fine panel-level control. Poses, control net, etc.

One thing that stuck out to me about the https://create.shortbread.ai/viewer/4566613c-7146-4ed7-9b8d-... example, and to a lesser extent the https://create.shortbread.ai/viewer/aafc2f61-d008-4f3f-aa8f-... example is that the people of opposing teams sometimes face in the same direction. Typically you'd have them physically facing each other.

But that is very much a nit-pick. And one that a human can manually fix when looking at the result by mirroring some of the panels. This is super cool!
That was such a well written, introspective, and vulnerable story. I've had several opportunities to experience similar rides with very similar endings, and know how gut wrenching failure feels. And how it's often just a failure, with nothing learned. With writing like this, though, the rest of us get to learn.
Link seems to be more about the future of LWN security roundup emails than about actual RHEL security announcement emails (the article is really just the headline). Still an interesting discussion to observe and deduce from.
After reading the doc, I started to realise things were really hard pre GPT era.
I talk online. In private, through DMs.

I mostly use public posts to make new friends, which I then exclusively speak to privately.
> There is a common view of cultural norms as at worst tyrannical or at best random and arbitrary, rather than the sophisticated and curated product of billions of human lives.

> Social iconoclasts dismiss organized religion, marriage, sexual norms, social duty, gender roles, and cultural traditions.

Some of the cultural norms you named there are millions of years old and show little variance across cultures and time. Others only a few millennia old at best and show very high variance.
I think it's more difficult because of #1. I would add that DevOps has mostly turned out as a way for companies to combine the jobs of two people into one, which creates enormous scope and only increases the context switching.
Ha, the Motorola Museum tour should have been a mandatory annual event for all executives and high-level managers.

“We build new things, we create entirely new product segments, but when markets start to mature we sell the division to someone who knows how to run that kind of business.”

They failed to do that with CPUs and then they failed to do that with mobile phones. And it pretty much killed the company.

That museum. So much stuff from one single company. It was incredible - for the first 80 years.
It was a mix of what I already knew (.NET) and what I wanted to learn (React). I love C# as a language and it works just fine with whatever frontend you throw at it (it's just an API after all). I wouldn't touch a Microsoft frontend framework with a ten-foot pole.
Does reader mode eliminate "filler"?
> I you're after something similar (write a SPA in non-JS) but you prefer Java or Kotlin

What would be a Python equivalent?
// Aella’s surveys help people make grounded and informed decisions about baseline behaviors

Separate from this topic, I find that understanding of what's "mainstream" is completely irrelevant to informing my own decision making.

It is mainstream to have a gambling addiction, be overweight, be heavily in debt, etc. The fact that something is "normal" doesn't tell you it's good.
Also 2 == 2. You're not making an argument, you're just saying that LLMs aren't human.
Looks like how enums are often formatted. My guess is there was an environment enum with these values someone is referencing
It has too many dedicated vendor-specific communities centred around hobbyists for it to ever truly die
QRs were an attempt to introduce it. It was simply postponed. Something worse is coming in to the West.

They will eliminate cash and now social system is even worse.
Д-503, a spacecraft engineer, rated 47-29.

The first figure reflecting social status, and the second – social level, reflecting “merits” and “prospects”, respectively.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel) (1921)
h-t-t-p-s colon whack whack slash dot dot com
This is a clone of Nykaa's website
Only LLaMA2, or does it also work on Mistral-7B?
They’re not. They are supposed to be general-purpose allocators with requirements that may not match your workload.
A bubble won't provide enough radiation protection. They'll have to live in underground tunnels.
I think you are conflating succumbing to a vice (eg porn) and orienting your life around an identity (eg poly)
If it helps, I wrote a very long and detailed blog post several years ago about the techniques I used to rewrite my team's Git repo history (including stripping out junk files, _and_ actually rewriting source file contents via formatting and codemods for _old_ commits):

https://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2018/11/git-js-history-rew...

I specifically was looking for techniques that would let me quickly iterate over ~15000 commits.

granted, the repo size I was working with was only a few GB, but hopefully there's some pieces there you can find useful.
> So, bash is a programming language, right?

No, it's a shell that lets you interact with the OS.
All the "clasical" UNIX shells were created with interactive use in mind and optimized for it,
but happen to be good enough at batch processing[1] to be conflated with programming languages (mostly these days, like, 40+ years later).

The focus on interactive use is the reason you don't have to

- surround command argument lists with parentheses

- put commas between command arguments

- put semicolons at EOL

- surround string literals with quotes (unless the content interferes with the syntax, like, sigils or IFS chars, and you want to escape it).

- surround variable names in braces (unless you want to use some advanced substitution)

- call commands to manipulate I/O; it's baked in.

And these are just the things that existed 40 years ago. Bash gives you so much more stuff that makes interactive use a bliss, but I'm not going to dump the man page here.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batch_processing
How to Roman Republic 101, Part V: The Courts
How does the device know what time it is?

What happens if the original was taken with any existing device that doesn't make signatures, or is a model that subsequently had its keys revoked?
You admittedly would have 0 idea if any instances of racism were pointed to since you turned it off after a minute due to a single phrase that's exited for a long time being used.
Ukraine seemed to do it with MANPADs and anti-tank equipment over small arms. Unless you're counting those, but that doesn't seem like the kind of weapons ordinary Americans have at home.
You can just restart the device and the infection will disappear.
You’re correct - there’s obviously no tax benefit since nonprofits have no tax obligation. I don’t think it’s a coincidence they moved there in the midst of all the last administration’s saber rattling with China. The previous entity was HQed in the US and then merged into a Swiss entity so pretty safe to assume why.
These are all security issues that Apple fixes by moving them outside of the process.
> The subscription rate will have to be set so that it’s not more expensive over say 3 years to buy a PC with Windows and than it is to buy a comparable Mac…

i agree with your overall point. tho for me, i suspect the price would need to be significantly less than than that (PC price included.)

my main driver is linux, but im on windows for probably 40% of work stuff. however, i have incredible subscription fatigue. its to the point now that i forego products regularly if i cant just buy it outright. i’ll happily even pay more than i would over time just to 1) not have to manage and deal with the constant little pin pricks of soooo many subscriptions, and 2) to feel like i own the thing.

if windows goes subscription, i will almost certainly just move to mac for the things i cant do with linux and if my read of others is correct, i suspect many many others would do the same.
While I agree fail2ban is a wrong tool to prevent password brute force - better authentication mechanisms should be used instead - it has its uses. For example, it can be used to automatically ban (or alert about) dumb http scanners like gobuster. I am not saying, a determined attacker cannot bypass it, but if it saves me some hassle and raises the bar for them, why should not I do it?

More general, some attacker actions, especially during recon, rely on making many attempts to connect, fetch an URL, resolve FQDN, etc., these could be detected and automatically responded to, making attacker’s job harder and providing extra visibility to defenders.
> I can't find recent examples of this happening

Before or after a public exploit is posted alongside CVE+patch?
That passage is fascinating in that it itself confidently makes statements about history that are based more on supposition than evidence.

For starters, it’s true that the name “Easter” probably comes from a Germanic goddess, but in most other languages the name of the holiday is related to Pesach, the Hebrew word for Passover. (As a holiday, Easter is directly descended from Passover, as that’s when Jesus died.)

The English name for Easter derives only indirectly from the pagan goddess, because Germanics used the name Easter for the springtime month of April. Similar to how Good Friday took its name from the day of the week, not because it had any relation to the worship of Frigg.

Easter eggs aren’t a “fertility ritual” either—they came to Easter via Persian New Year celebrations.
When you have private for-profit healthcare you get a lot of wait lists. They come in the forms of "I can't afford that" and "I can still walk on that leg, I don't need to spend our retirement."
Show HN: Spin2Win the Game of AI
Sorry, I don’t know anything about Asp.net.

My comment definitely applies to the other two options you listed.
If it's a straightforward hash, that's easy to evade by modifying the output slightly (even programmatically).

If it's a perceptual hash, that's easy to _exploit_: just ask the AI to repeat something back to you, and it typically does so with few errors. Now you can mark anything you like as "AI-generated". (Compare to Schneier's take on SmartWater at https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/03/the_security_...).
> replicability

It doesn't. ChatGPT's architecture is non-deterministic.
One day hopefully I'll manage to find one of these magic unicorn positions that y'all seem to have around these parts. Until then I'll have to do with wanting to die rather than be at work.
In case you missed it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37789679
I feel like the available data is way too scarce to attribute positive results to any individual executive with any degree of statistical significance. Do you know if there’s been research done on this?

My perception is that it’s really really hard to differentiate between someone who’s genuinely a force to be reckoned with and someone who’s just in the right place at the right time. After their first success they can hop around between companies from executive role to executive role playing it safe and riding the gravy train just by not fucking it up. I’d be interested if anyone can provide examples of executives that consistently trigger inflections in a company’s performance within say 2 years of joining across multiple companies. I’m genuinely curious.
Exactly, with NVIDIAs core focus on AI way before it was cool has lead to them being in this advantageous position. For AMD just being a price friendly competitor to Intel and Nvidia was the motto.
I've processed TBs of CSV files with pandas. You can always read files in chunks and in the end, SQL will also need to read data somewhere from a disk.