skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You'd update BGP and the routers. They'd support both v4 and v4.1 packets with unified routing. All existing ownership of /32s from ipv4 would get carried over. Say v4.1 addrs are 64-bit max. V4.1 dst=1.2.3.4.53.2.1 could get BGP-routed to a 1.2.3/24 router, routed to a 1.2.3.4/32, to 1.2.3.4.53/40, to the dst. Also, during the transition period, a v4.1 packet addressed to a 32-bit addr would get auto-translated to v4.

This is unlike v6, which cannot address anything inside the v4 space. v6 and v4 are totally separate planes.
I cannot abide the argument that obviating work is a harm. That's luddism, which has proven every single time to be more harmful in the long term than embracing new technology, which may have harms but only in the short term.

I also think you're overestimating the short term harms. I believe human writing will stay valuable, especially the premium creative variety. It's the un-creative, mechanical writing that's becoming somewhat obsolete.
Mostly a ton of JavaScript. As for the concepts explained visually, ICYMI there is a small footnote at the end of the article:

> To generate the 50D word embeddings we used the GloVe 6B 50D pre-trained model and converted to Word2Vec format. To generate the 2D representation of word embeddings we used the BERT large language model and reduced dimensionality using UMAP. The self-attention values and the probability scores in the beam search section are conceptual.
I am confused why people care so much, and spend so much time convicing others of their position about Twitter/X

It's just a private company running a website. They come and go like myspace, tumblr and whatever else. One day nobody will use Facebook or Reddit.

Why are people so caught up personally and emotionally about a single one going to crap?

Use it if you like it, and stop using it if you don't. It seems extremely simple to me.
Would the UEFI malware affect a non-windows OS installed on that machine?
I agree we should not try to preserve jobs that are no longer needed. Though I don't think there's any copyright involved in your analogy :)

I just think we should be clear about the potential short-to-medium term effects / harm. And given how transformative this technology can be, we may need to come up with solutions that don't fit into existing frameworks -- e.g. making sure that the datasets and models are open access.
Is there something like founder-business fit?
I'm a developer to start with.

I am currently running a services business, which I know would do well if I put my heart and soul into it.

But I can't. I can't provide repetitive services and do client support, the way I write code.

Am I burnt out or should I actually consider switching to a product business? (I have a validated idea with proven demand)

Is there something like a founder-business fit?
Booking.com makes a fortune – so why is it leaving its bills to hotels unpaid?
OK I'll give a hint.

1. Jan 1 - June 1, 2023

2. Yes.
>without knowing why, after 2 PM most of our brains are quite fried. So, we changed that.

And by "changed that" OP means moving the important meeting before 2. Whether everyone still feels spent every afternoon, and if he even cares just gets glossed over. Weird flex, but OK.
Without going to specifics, a large reason for that may be that among those who say this are a large number who loudly push for unrealistic ideas masquerading them as constructive. Some may be honestly ignorant about it, but it is also unfortunately quite an effective way to derail any discussion and delay progress. See for example any suggestion about real world hyperloops.
I think a lot of how we got the current situation was Apple. They proved that most people don't care about modularity/repairability, and they argued reasons why closed/locked-down is better (and some of those arguments weren't entirely without merit, despite being self-serving). This convinced a lot of decision-makers to go that route.

I think the overall trend is still toward Steve Job's vision. Looking at Tesla for example, does not fill me with optimism of a modular/repairable future.
And with cars, pretty much all parts/accessories will work for any "model" in that 5-8 year window. Phones are not like this.
How would reproduction of fictional works or the creation of derivative works based on fictional training inputs constitute “a recording of facts”?
I doubt it happens "a lot". Accidentally shooting deaths are about 900/yr and I assume dogs are rarely the trigger. Even for hunting accidents, shootings are not the main culprit (it's usually falls).
Many grids do have this for normal residences, but it only covers your air conditioner not everything (and maybe water heater). By running your AC on half duty cycle all day your house still stays cool enough and they are able to reduce substantial peak demand. For most people HVAC and water heating are the two biggest demands, and also ones where simple management can result in a substantial changes in demand without affecting your comfort.
I would say it’s reproduction of an exact copy that represents copyright infringement, not dissemination of the digital brain that remembered it.

If and when someone tries to profit off an AI work that would be copyright infringement if a human had made it, it should be copyright infringement of an AI does it also.
These are contrivances. MacBook Airs cost roughly as much as similarly-configured Ultrabooks (or whatever higher-end laptops are now referred to as) and wireless networking has "just worked" on the last two dozen devices I've installed Linux on in the past decade.
No "war" ever started. It was just an idea by a few niche people who wanted to disable 1/3 to 2/3 of their browser's technology then demand that web-site operators/builders spend a lot of time and money on implementing for that sub-1% population. They didn't, and these people had no real leverage.

The biggest argument was accessibility, but it turns out people with extra needs don't want a poorly maintained version of the page with a ton of missing features. So instead additional aria tips were added, website operators encouraged (or required by law) to hit A-AAA, to explain parts of the page, combined with assistive technologies getting much better.

The other big argument was in essence "Build first for IE11, then add Firefox/WebKit features on top." Which naturally went away when IE died and evergreen browsers took over.
LA using AI/predictive analytics to predict homelessness and prevent it
So is it okay to kill a thousand monkeys for funsies because it is “insignificant in comparison”? No, that would be highly unethical. There is no societal benefit to such a action, so nothing can justify the action. No matter how few animals you killed that is infinitely worse than the meat industry in aggregate.

How about if I kill 1000 monkeys to produce junk science thus slowing the rate of scientific progress? That is even worse since not only is there no societal benefit, there is societal harm. No matter how few animals you killed that is infinitely worse than the meat industry in aggregate.

Well guess what, Neuralink is almost certainly doing junk science as evidenced by their total disregard for basic established scientific protocol. The problem with Neuralink is not that they kill animals. I am okay with killing animals. What I am not okay with is the bad science.

When you are running experiments to validate if your implant is safe, and you use a unapproved adhesive known to be neurotoxic to attach the implant, then the monkey dies to the neurotoxic effects of the adhesive, you did not do any science, you just learned that you should stop ignoring instructions. A child could have taught you that. You are not pushing the boundaries of knowledge through the sacrifice of animals, you are pushing the boundaries of primary school. You do not get to kill animals to learn that.
How to speed up the vaccine testing process
*-WhatIf
Um. No you're not. I refuse to participate in a process where I send out 300 bullshit apps.

Instead, network. Reach out to your college profs and family friends. Go to meetups and tech events. Do hackathons. Anything to get time with a real human to build a connection.

Seriously, its how things get done.
I'm certain an officer could find all sorts of reasons to ticket that vehicle if inspired.
Paradigms have changed, chat will be a primary modal for search in time. This is why Bing and Goog are both finding ways to get ads into our chat experiences. We might be forced away from ad dollars being the primary way to pay for the internet. With data privacy, ideally content based ad placement over individual targeting (think magazine style ads), the move to paid access to sites or content... there are trends that may combine to break the current foundations.
> In spirit, it’s still fair use.

Spirit crafted by people who couldn't even begin to imagine LLMs. The proper answer here is new laws clarifying the stance of copyright and LLMs/generative models in general, not trying to reason like a 19th century person about 21st century tech.

The EU's approach is much more sensible - there is this new thing with vast ramifications, let's sit down and see what legal framework is needed for it.
Warmest September on Record
I don't quite understand what you're proposing here. Generally you only control and operate ~1 node per IPv4 address or per IPv6 /64.

All other nodes are operated by someone else, so they don't cooperate on anything beyond what the protocol specifies. Which means everyone is their own little silo. If you want a list of all currently active torrents (millions) then you have to do it with 1 or a handful of nodes, depending on how many IPs you have. DHTs are not arbitrary-distributed-compute frameworks, they're a quite restrictive get/put service.

BEP51[0] does let you query other nodes for a sample of their keys (infohashes) but what they can offer is limited by their vantage point of the network so you need to go around and ask all those millions of nodes. And since it's all random you can't really "search" for anything, you can only sample. And that just gives you 20-byte keys. Afterwards you need to do a lot of additional work to turn those into human-readable metadata.

[0] http://bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0051.html
How can we overcome mental health crisis?
How as a community can we help people around us? The world is collapsing through mental health
It did feel around ~2012 or so was when computer/laptop upgrades stopped mattering, roughly coinciding with the switch to SSDs from HDDs.
I think that even summaries are not fair use when they get to a certain length. The Cliff Notes company has to license the material that they summarize, why not OpenAI?
Relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/654/
FTA: “courts have rejected the argument that commercial fair use is by its nature invalid”

They don’t mention https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,.... There, initial settlements had book authors share revenues with Google, and Google was allowed to go ahead with the project because Google Books complied with (from that Wikipedia page) “the four traditional factors […] that decide whether use of a copyrighted work constitutes fair use under United States copyright law”, stating “Google Books enhances the sales of books to the benefit of copyright holders.”

Of course this is a different case, but I think it’s similar enough for a judge to at least consider whether what OpenAI does is to the benefit of copyright holders.

Unless they start revenue sharing with copyright holders or paying them, I don’t see how they can be.
Yes, the egl version should provide thumbnails!

Do not hesitate to reach out on discord or GitHub for help.
>run the cable under your shirt; that should leave little-to-no exposed cable to snag on things

...except your shirt when you take your phone out of your pocket to change what's playing, answer a message, etc :|
History is not propaganda. Lenovo repeatedly sold out their customers, lied to them, and put them at risk of everything from spying to remote code execution. They've more than earned their reputation and it should haunt them every time they are mentioned.

Maybe after several decades have gone by without incident I might consider that they've changed their ways, but I sure wouldn't count on that happening.

Here's them still not having learned their lesson in Feb of 2021 https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/03/lenovo_indelible_adwa...

Here's them still not having learned their lesson in April of 2022
https://www.zdnet.com/article/lenovo-patches-uefi-vulnerabil...

Today, I wouldn't trust this company to make an alarm clock (https://blog.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability-spotlight-h...) let alone a laptop.
Ah, thanks for correcting that.
You are sort of correct. NTP is pretty decentralized. DNS has a few specific servers (root servers) that all DNS eventually hits to find where to get a result, but, the 'tree' of DNS resolution is much different from that of NTP, which doesnt have such a tree, except as defined by any DNS entries, if they are used (ex pool.ntp.org has many A records for many ips or CNAMEs to other domains (ex 0.pool.ntp.org)).

There are many contributors to the official timekeeping. Most facilities who do science will have their own actual atomic clock, which they then share out the data, in the form of an NTP server, however, they will not typically use data from the rest of the world, except for correlation events. The rest of the world relies on a handful of clocks which are either from NIST (ntp.org I think is owned by them), or from major providers like cloudflare (not sure they have an ntp server available the public can use, im almost certain that they would use their own atomic clock internally for security reasons), microsoft also has one, i think, afaik they would need to because they provide their own ntp pool, but they may just aggregate from multiple NIST servers.

You can setup your own NTP server as well, and setup systems you own to start using it instead of whatever is configured. And, if one were so inclined, could even find and run your own atomic clock, and register it with the ntp pool. Im actually not sure the atomic clock is required, id hope it would be, but idk.
Espionage fuels global cyberattacks
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ectropy
I think in some ways LLMs have shown people want simple answers to their questions when they pose it to a search engine.

Stack Overflow was good because it had answers (one chosen as right) and a little bit of discussion about why and how and other considerations.

Much of the web is verbose to an extreme to get the search engines to rank it highly. People don't want that, they just want answers.
Couldn't mkcert handle most of that process?
That’s not “on the other hand.” Thats part of the free speech you claimed to support.
It definitely could if they wanted it to. I'm less worried about that because of the threat of PR blowback that helps keep them in check, but if it's really important to you then you should probably avoid Lenovo. Frame.work is quite a nice option.
Can you point me to an example of a timer in the kernel that is not settable/tunable that should be? My experience in looking at such things suggests that most of the #defined bits are because RFCs define the protocol that way.

As for network stack per application: you're more than welcome to so so a myriad of ways - linux provides many different ways to pull raw IP, or raw ethernet into userspace (e.g. xdp, tun/tap devices, dpdk, and so on). It's not like you're being forced to use the kernel stack from lack of supported alternatives.
Isn‘t implementing joins in the application what microservices are all about?
There is a link top right on our website
Analysis done back in 2016, back when 2015 shattered records due to El Nino (and completely shattered the argument around a "pause" in global warming due to the El Nino spike back in 1998):

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2016/01/27/el-nino-and-the-2015...

https://tamino.wordpress.com/2016/01/29/correcting-for-more-...
it's easy, fast, and cheap to copy|make bytes, and gets more so every day
The Court reversed its position because many of justices that supported the Lochner case retired only to be filled in by political allies friendly to the New Deal like senator-turned-judge Byron White. The ones that remained were allegedly pressured by the Roosevelt administration's threats to pack the court (i.e. the switch in time to save nine). Regardless, the actual jurisprudence on Lochner hasn't been rebutted, only deemed unpopular by both wings of the court. The conservatives, due to the invocation of substantive due process, and the social progressives, due to their general aversion to recognize negative economic rights. Law schools will cite Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s lone dissent as "proof" of Lochner's failings, but a close study of it (and of Holmes's legal "realism" as a whole) reveals it to be fallacious, hypocritical, and nihilistic.

In addition, your definition is inconsistent with the standard applied by Lochner or the Constitution. In the majority opinion of Lochner, the power of contract was not unlimited, as the court deemed health regulations in general as a proper exercise of the state's police powers. However, the State of New York had to demonstrate that its health law regarding employee hours was not employment regulation in disguise (hint: it was) and that any such regulation did not infringe upon the protection of rights afforded by the 14th amendment (hint: it did)

Contrary to your statement, freedom of contract had preceded Lochner for over a century. Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution explicitly recognizes that the states may not inter alia impair contracts. The Contracts Clause has been invoked in Fletcher v. Peck and Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward. Both cases form the bedrock of modern contract jurisprudence today.
Some people get up in the morning thinking about sales, some about finances, and some about code. One reason to consider building a team is to have some of each!
agreed, i was about to comment "but will these 4 out of 5 devices allow removal of the lenovo crapware?"
This sounds like a misunderstanding of the model. Usually these companies have facilities that allow core teams to recover if prod gets completely fucked e.g. auth is broken so we need to bypass it. Those facilities are typically on separate, dedicated networks but that doesn’t mean the people who would use them operate in that environment day to day.
Government agencies I've worked usually build an app and put it in production without very few evolutions for 15+ years.

Data is the most important stuff for them and being able to read it is therefore very important.

A nosql DB structure can usually only be read by the code that goes with it and if nobody understands the code you're doomed.

In 2017, I had to extract data from an app from 1994.
The app was built with a language that wasn't widely used at the time and had disappeared today.
It disappeared before all the software companies put their doc on the internet.
You can't run it on anything older than windows2k.
There was only one guy in Montréal that knew how to code and run that thing.

As the DB engine was relational with a tool like sqlplus, I was able to extract all the data and we rebuilt the app based on the structure we found in the database.

If you want to do that with Nosql, you must maintain a separate documentation that explains your structure... And we all now how dev like documentation.
MyFitnessPal > SparkPeople

iPhone games > Yahoo Games
It should gain a small amount; it is a more efficient protocol, with better compression and including 0-RTT for repeat visitors. But I doubt it would be noticeable on such a light site.
Well, I am definitely against the kind of involvement these large companies, that are set to benefit the most, are argumenting for, which is limiting / gate-keeping access.

Rather, I could imagine the opposite -- some sort of guarantee of access to everyone, at fair prices. There are different ways to do this.
PropelAuth (YC W22) Is Hiring Rust Developers
From wikipedia

> Typical crystal RTC accuracy specifications are from ±100 to ±20 parts per million (8.6 to 1.7 seconds per day), but temperature-compensated RTC ICs are available accurate to less than 5 parts per million.[12][13] In practical terms, this is good enough to perform celestial navigation, the classic task of a chronometer. In 2011, chip-scale atomic clocks became available. Although vastly more expensive and power-hungry (120 mW vs. <1 μW), they keep time within 50 parts per trillion.
You don't actually need your heat pump 24x7 even on those cold days, if you can run for 15 minutes one, 15 off that would make a big difference to the grid (your neighbor running the same schedule but opposite times) without making your house too cold. Managing the above is tricky though.
This is disingenuous.

The "most" in your strawman here is just companies like Google who want to a) bend to those who want to DRM the entire web b) hide and lock away their tracking traffic from those being tracked c) make ad blocking impossible.

Please explain why OC "can't be surprised."
Why does this article read like propaganda. Its pretty technical and I don't understand all of it and it still reads like propaganda.
You need a compelling 'why'. What is your mission, how do you want to spend your precious time? Why do you want to do these things. This is the root of motivation.
> The thing is, price anchoring is a thing, and people are going to look at a phone that costs $400 and needs a $40 Extra Thing and a $500 phone and go "the latter is easier".

Oh definitely. I would too. I dream of the price being only $200/TB.

The biggest storage upgrade for a normal iPhone is +384GB for $300 (Oof). If you upgrade to the Max model you can get +768GB for $400.

A Galaxy S23 can get +128GB for $60, a Galaxy S23+ can get +256GB for $120, and a Galaxy S23 Ultra can get +768GB for $420.

A Pixel 8 can get +128GB for $60, and a Pixel 8 Pro can get +896GB for $400.

If you include the price increase of better base models, to get access to bigger options, then $700/TB is a good ballpark figure.

I think this pricing is a little bit better than when I last looked, but it's still very bad.

The availability of >512GB is growing but still flaky and usually requires extra expensive base models. While in comparison microsd has had cheap 1TB for a good while, and 1.5TB for $150 becomes available later this month.
New York City Subway Signalling Simulator
He's got a new video about rail shapes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nteyw40i9So
> Because I don't want to learn another complex DSL just to install some packages. Whether Nix is the promised land or not, Brew works just fine 99% of the time and I have stuff to do.

It surely is complex, but I think you're intrinsically devaluing the importance of dependency management. Your important 'stuff to do' is built on top of a lot of software, getting that supply chain right (and reproducible) is at least as important.
> I do think however that we are mostly ignoring cases where the AI literally does plagiarize the training data.

So just punish the AI just like you would punish a human? Take it to court, have it respond before a judge, if it loses it will be subject to having GPUs taken out.