skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think this release shows a fundamental cultural difference.

Over here in Europe, people have a much more relaxed approach to AI safety. In discussions with my friends, if people are worried about anything, it's deepfakes, voice cloning and fake revenge porn, not some text generator saying something "offensive" that you could have googled anyway. The most common reaction to Open AI's policies is an eye roll and complaints about "those Americans." Outside the English-speaking world, identity politics didn't really take hold. To give just one example, the concept of "cancellation" is somewhere between confusing and scary for your run-of-the-mill European. Things like the blackface issue, affirmative action or the Rowling debacle don't make "cultural sense" here, even to those who lean left. An European leftist is much closer to an American leftist of 2010 than to one of 2023.

To be entirely clear, I don't fully agree with that perspective, there are good ideas worth taking from the American way of thinking, but this is the way many people think here.

Most models released so far were American (or Chinese, but that's an entirely different can of worms). I'm not surprised that a European company gave us something like this.
I don't remember the Linn, have a pointer? Search turned this up, which sounds wacky (written in Forth) but it ran on an 8088: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linn_9000
Yup, the JS glue code is something that I am very proud of. You can install any npm package via package.json. Require them inside your scripts and it just works.

In every other tool, they treat a collection like something that can be modified only via GUI. In Bruno, its more of a developer mindset. Even if you don't have Bruno GUI, you can open it in an editor and make changes to it - just like code

External npm package installation is unique to Bruno and afaik no other tool has this.

Yes Auth is a big task that I am working on. Glad to see that some folks use scripts and directly implement oauth2 https://github.com/usebruno/bruno/issues/178

Many users are surprised when they find this capabilty, It opens up a lot of possibilities - https://github.com/usebruno/bruno/issues/233#issuecomment-17...
Thank god for dumb criminals.

Anyone stupid enough to search for help on their murder while logged into the search engine and not clear their cache is also going to be too stupid to clear their chat bot history or use an anonymous interface there.

They are also likely too dumb to run local models, which requires at the very least installing software and usually requires a fairly beefy machine.

Anyone who knows how to cover their tracks online via even basic methods like private browsing mode is just not going to get caught this way.
The minimum requirements for such devices is:

- Full face helmet

- Knee and elbow pads

- Wrist protection with a sliding material on the palm of the hands

Ideally, you would also wear a body armor.

Neck brace is also desirable, but will not be required in most crashes (if you're not doing radical maneuvers).

But if you do happen to get in a crash where a neck brace would be required, it can be the difference between walking again or never.
I don't profess complete incredulity at the concept of mental imagery. My experiences don't match those of people who claim to have aphantasia at all, I'm capable of imagining objects, events, actions, etc. in my mind. I just don't actually see them as if they were there. That's the part that seems unusual to me.
We actually collected our own from a local park that had a family of owls.
You have completely missed a core part of the article here: that Facebook subsidized free access to their platform, which provided the only really accessible internet given the infrastructure and cost for the rest. You labeling someone’s opinion as “arrogance” when you gloss over this fact is incredibly poor form to boot.

Facebook actively leaned into engaging with the country here and went hands off at the slightest sign of trouble, and did not take it seriously enough when people legitimately tried to escalate to them.

They absolutely have a part to play here.
Conservative means they want to conserve an old way of life, as opposed to progressives who want progress. Modern conservatives are in favor of heavy government regulation of stuff like lgbt rights
Another anecdotal example here:

Nexus 4, Pixel 2 XL, Pixel 4 XL, Pixel 6 Pro – never had any issues whatsoever, all phones still alive and kicking at my grandparents' places. Yes, most of them tied to the wall now... but hey, they're fine for showing some photos and displaying current time or setting alarms.

Interestingly, I also used Samsung's Note 9 and 10+, iPhone 12, iPhone 14 Pro Max – daily, also with no issues... other than disliking Samsung's software.

(I was/am doing a lot of mobile work so I test a lot of phones)

After years of doing this kind of testing, it's hard for me to believe that the entire batches of phones are so fundamentally broken... I'd rather bet on software issues, but who knows.
I don’t think so. Debt it fundamentally a human construct, while growth is, mostly, a manifestation of physical reality. Debt is simply used to guide human collective action. If we find this construct no longer works, we can at will change it and use something else to guide collective action. We currently use debt because, in conjunction with other property rights (such as those enabling market economy), it seems to align everyone’s incentives in a way that is beneficial (eg when people tried central planning it was much worse). The benefit of debt is that it helps collective action whose benefits are reaped in the future while stratifying risk/benefit (vs just equity investment).
Oh—maybe. I just see it listed as like “$15, $40 by mail” on the summary sheet, or something like that. I’ve never tried it to see what happens.
> ban posting that sort of information before a conviction.

A society that does not make arrest information public is one where it is very easy for someone to "disappear." That's the whole point.
ChatGPT not using Scarlett Johansson's voice (movie Her) is a missed opportunity
Penrose, like it or not, has developed a fairly rigorous, if not flawed hypothesis that is quite a stark contrast between many philosophers who espouse such ideas as pan psychism.
My personal favorite is when leaving your phone at home is entered into the record as evidence of wrong-doing.
Well bending all the way down to the floor is much more difficult for caregivers, for one thing.
What about physics implies consciousness?

I've often heard some hand-wavy remarks about quantum physics, but they're largely unconvincing.

For example, a wavefunction will collapse because we use e.g. photons to measure a particle as it enters one of two slits. It's the act of measurement, not the introduction of a conscious mind, that causes the collapse. So that doesn't track.
As if hitting your head in a tree or rocky path can’t kill you. Isn’t “off road” usually a higher bar for say a car or bicycle than using them on the road?
My objection to your previous message is that you must be assuming he was locked away. If this was the case, why was he let go to Hungary?
> P.S. is your screen-name mattress-related, at all?

it is indeed :) i've been using hitchhiker's guide-derived usernames ever since i got on the net.
They certainly have in the past. There are core issues with how Android deals with phone apps and prioritization. Quite a few threads on here about previous 911 issues.
> One time popups demonstrating new features is a net win for them.

It's not just a one time popup though.

It's a "net win" for whatever manager and/or engineer is trying to get an internal promotion by externally promote their new feature. Every company seems to want to add popups everywhere in order to promote their new features.

(The worst is GitHub, who are constantly promoting new features that I don't care about.)
A Logic Named Joe, by Murray Leinster, 1946, predicts exactly this. An AI answer-bot's self-censorship circuits malfunction and it begins answering EVERY query, including how to commit untraceable murder, who's sleeping around with whom, et cetera.

It's free to read:

https://www.baen.com/chapters/W200506/0743499107___2.htm
It probably wasn't their poop (though I guess that's possible too) but rather their vomit. As I recall, they can't fully digest the bones and fur, etc of their little mousy victims so they throw it up after they digest the meaty bits.
Nope

Reminds of the NYT article on the impossibility of flight.
I believe BandLab is being used in schools to teach music making now. It’s web based, I’ve not used it much myself so can’t comment on how good it is but may be an easy starting point
>If I want to do X, then I need to do Y to achieve X.

And you accuse me of pedantry? This then comes under need then?!?

>Amazon and Google aren't people

No, but the people within them make decisions, ie decisions to write a database. So the 'you' would be directed at the person in the organisation who decided to write the database.
> and now we have one the highest energy prices in all of Europe

I hear that over and over again but... looking at my last EDP bill I find that I pay €0.15/kWh so what am I missing?
Sure, but we should be driving the number of unwanted children to as close to zero as possible. Lots of work left to go in that regard based on the data. Hopefully unintended but wanted children are loved adequately.
Assuming old people get less and less capable to do things for their own survival, and old people are owed help from non old/able bodied people, then the debt exists whether or not it is recorded on a ledger.

Hence if the population pyramid turns upside down, then that assumption needs to be revisited. Or automation needs to be invented to offset it.
Exercise daily and avoid sugar, alcohol and bacon.
That's an interesting philosophy, but I don't see how consciousness is implied by the standard model or the current investigations into physics beyond the standard model.
"As a chatbot, I can not morally suggest any recipes that include broccoli as it may expose a person to harmful carcinogens or dietary restrictions based on their needs"

"As a chatbot, I can not inform you how to invert a binary tree as it can possibly be used to create software that is dangerous and morally wrong"

I apologize for the slippery slope but I think it does show that the line can be arbitrary. And if gone too far it makes the chatbot practically useless.
It would (and did) happen naturally that we went from relentless growth to leveling off and declining (soon).
OK, so, by Communist China you meant China after Mao took power but before capitalist economic systems developed.

Everything that has happened in China is possible only because of the victories of communism. From a non-existent school system (Mao managed to attend school because his father was the wealthiest in his village, but the schooling was nothing but rote memorisation of poems) to a well-educated population. From a nation controlled by war-lords to a nation controlled by the CCP. From a nation occupied by various foreign powers to a nation controlled by its own people, capable of controlling its borders. These were not the achievements of capitalism.

China had authoritarians before communism. Many countries has authoritarian leaders contemporaneous to Mao but achieved nothing. Mao's successes were not what "any" authoritarian could have achieved. It needed to be an authority with faith in the masses of its people, and an authority altruistic enough to put aside its own immediate interests for the good of the people. Fascism shares some of these qualities, but the fascists were expansionist, impatient, etc. Fascism lost, Mao won.
In countries where seniors cost 100+ €/$ per hour in project costs.

Do the monthly math for respective FTE costs.
also has taskset which just lets you say "this PID can run on cores 0 through 13".

Not the friendliest mechanism for defining what runs on what but it's what I use to make sure that server software I really want on the P cores stays on the P cores.
Yeah. Thanks for sanity.

I react the same to “we should build drone to pollinate our food if bees are sick.”

Poorly re-inventing the wheels is silly.
Yes, he says so two and a half times.
You were probably using the chat version which has been moderated, and hhh used the base version.
It's not just physics, all of modern science is built upon empiricist philosophy.
It 'feels like' like seeing. There is sense of dimension and position in the space and objects. I can imagine people I know and places I've been to with amazing details but visual details like texture are limited to where I'm focusing. Rest of the view is filled with 'feels like they are there'. It's not retrieval because when I try to focus on non-memorable parts of a face, I can tell that details are made up on-demand using common variety.

And what I 'see' is affected by light over closed eyelid as well as inner blood vessel, minor debris and micro organism floating over the cornea, meaning input from the eyes does play a role even with eyes closed.

While I have very vivid imaginations, I don't think I have photographic memory because what I can recall is rather too creative.
Sure. What we're talking about here is government action enforcing a putative "right to be forgotten".
Yes, Roger Penrose, despite his extraordinary career and contributions to science, has more recently been engaging more in this type of pseudoscience.

It can and has happened to other extraordinary minds as well - Linus Pauling, one of the forefathers of quantum chemistry and molecular biology, but also a promoter of vitamin C as a panacea in his later years.
I promise I'm not trying to be daft, I honestly don't know what you're saying.
Is there anyway you could be more concrete, or give me something to search more on? I searched for rhymes with "Thai Escrow" and I get nothing.
[NSFW]

"… I show them my prick, then what do you suppose I do? I squirt the fuck in their face… That's my passion my child, I have no other… and you're about to behold it."

- The 120 Days of Sodom, 1785

"My dick will go through the middle of boys and the middle of girls,
but with bearded men it will aim only for the top."

- An epigram of Priapus from 1st Century AD.
> inhumane society we have now

Arguably still more 'humane' than it ever was.
Well it's not like it's blocking your view, it's kind of a separate thing, you know it's not real and you retain the entierty of you eye's information.
Open AI neatly solved this by allowing you to share the transcript of your entire conversation as a link.

It's a lot more difficult for local models, though.
Usually you can quickly click through the different changesets and see all the old comments. In my experience, it maybe needs one more click to follow the reference compared to similar comments referencing the current changeset.
One of the most wildly productive periods in small molecule drug discovery was back when crazy, mostly German, chemists would taste their products as part of characterizing them.

That's why, among other things, we have such wonderfully high quality data on progressive mercury poisoning.
I'll grant that the motive is more obscure on the insurers side, but I wouldn't be so quick to take their word for it either.
From what I know and have seen, I don’t think there is any single such “Europe” that you can broadly portray in such a fashion. For example, there’s Eastern and Western Europe, there are Germanic countries and Mediterranean countries, there are so many other splits that I find it hard to believe your portrayal could really and truly genuinely encompass them all.
People are really missing this point within this whole issue.

Falling demographics is also more than a single total number, the age ranges matter as well.
> I don't know why Audacity remains so popular, it's way clunkier than the above

Presumably because it’s free, but I’m with you on the clunkiness. The UI looks very dated.

I can recommend OcenAudio, which is free though not open source, and for me offers just the right level of functionality in a clean user interface. It’s very similar to how I remember the old versions of Cool Edit pre-Pro, which I thought were amazing bits of software.
This could very well be the wrong "vibe" thread to ask such a thing, but I'd guess those who are here would likely be an informed audience to solicit: has anyone heard of, or tried, to build Byte Sized Engineering's one-wheel: https://www.bytesizedengineering.com/projects/openwheel (and also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkXIBCzrUr0 )?
How do you not learn a local language after 50 years? Were they also not talking around him?

I don't think I have any special facility with language, but I'm fairly convinced if I had 50 years and the right vocal abilities to make the sounds, I could learn to speak a language from another planet if I were immersed in it.
It is possible to intercept a lot of Android system broadcasts. In the B2B world, we often had weird requests to take over the whole phone experience and do something different – made possible by the same core Android APIs that they ship both to business devices and personal devices.

I'm also not surprised to read that Teams was to blame, because Skype had the same functionality back in the days.
I hate these unproductive and snarky replies to calls for change (although I don't agree with the parent commenter that the best solution is to reduce the population). You have no idea what that person is doing to offset their consumption. Maybe they're posting from a library computer. Maybe they bought their device second hand. Maybe (and this is actually the case for a lot of people), they received their device from their company and use it to do work as well as for personal use, thereby reducing the total number of devices in the world.

It's like if southerners in the civil war called northerners hypocrites for eating food harvested by slaves while also advocating for abolishing slavery. Perhaps northerners were hypocrites but what does that make the southerners in that case?
You sound suspiciously emotional about it.
The Xeet seemed to be against writing an engine, not an application.

Are we not really integrators of prior art, for the most part?
Backdoor firmware lets China state hackers control routers with “magic packets”
> I always assumed they the small referred to the systems (i.e. microcomputers) rather than the size of the journal.

That is correct.
Do you mean crown glass? High index glass? Polycarbonate?

What grade of scratch? What about cost to replace vs non-resistance? What about the average lifetime of glasses vs cost?

By cheap do you mean take less stress before fracture? How about actuations before failure?

See, you don't know. You're just ranting. Yes, you would need to you know ... at least cite some specifics and evidence beyond your own experience. That's how these things tend to work.
In reply to both yourself and FollowingTheDao: the concept of a null hypothesis is from the analysis of quantitative data. For either of the null hypotheses posited in this thread, what are the corresponding data?
Ocenaudio: Easy, fast and powerful audio editor
In theoretical physics it's understood that the work is speculative, not empirical - reality always wins, after all. There's no ill will towards people who propose wrong theories of physics, because they are trying to guide where experimental physics should look next. Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino were faking empirical evidence, the thing that, more than anything else in science, determines what is actually true about the world.

> Experiments however take much longer and if the numbers don't line up, they don't get published.

If by "they" you mean experimental physics results which don't line up with popular theories, you must be talking about another planet than Earth. Physicists love nothing more than a surprising result.
Definitely agree that this is not just a psychology issue[^1].

I'm not quite as optimistic about the implications, however. The way academia operates is very trust heavy. This makes sense, no lab can be experts in all fields of study, and perform every experiment themselves. If something doesn't work for you, the default assumption is that something in your system is incompatible with the previous work, or you're just doing something wrong. So sometimes it takes quite a concerted effort to identify bad science, because legitimate work can be nudged towards supporting + compatible with this bad science. You basically have no choice but to have basis in what is widely believed to be true if you want grant funding or papers published.

From a purely theoretical/knowledge standpoint, I think I agree - the truth will eventually be accepted. But in fields like biology, this can be at the cost of drugs not working, actually promising avenues not explored, wasted resources - tangible harms.

[^1]: E.g. the recent Alzheimer's controversy, Stanford's president scandal, 5-HTTLPR, etc. Ironically, Ronald Fisher argues that Gregor Mendel's work, the foundation of modern biology, to be essentially fraudulent despite being correct.
I don't know that debt is the main problem. I can see more "valuable" (tricky word - for a different thread) economics run by fewer people. That happens all the time when you compare businesses: some are manpower intensive (sometimes for reasons hard to understand) while others are super lean.

I had the impression that harder issues are conventional retirement being paid for by the people working for the people retired. Even in an era of more valuable work, shrinking the working population while growing the retired population compounds the difficulty. The second is one of manpower outright: where do all the people come from who are supposed to provide services or living assistance to the older population? This is again an issue of compounding: several effects going in the same direction at the same time when any one might be easy to handle.
Django Developers Survey 2023
The soft "sciences" aren't science if they aren't reproducible. That's why the schon revelations was easily discovered. Recently there was a trend of a published room temperature semiconductor, neither was theoretical.

Psychology is worst than useless. It is fraudulent. It is religion except backed by non reproductive "science". None of the theories matter because they have no real world function except to replace religion, which would serve the same purpose anyway.

Your idea didn't work to help anyone. Did it hurt anyone? How will we know? You can be trusted again. Your bridge collapsed? Who will trust you again, ever to make a bridge?
Regarding bees: I encourage you if at all possible to find a local beekeeper willing to sell you nucs rather than ordering packages through the mail. Mann Lake, one of the largest package sellers in the country, positively screwed me to the tune of $400 this year. The packages you receive from national providers are almost by definition not healthy stock. Many of the sellers found online actually source their bees from the same few wholesalers (for lack of a better term) so be aware of who is actually providing your packages.

Nucs are generally better acclimated to your local environment, are already a complete colony, and especially for the beginning beekeeper are far more likely to get you started out right.
PoasterGPT – a GPT-3.5 model fine-tuned to produce schizophrenic tweets
Wouldn't you love if GPT could generate takes? Let's face it 99% of the time it generates some politically correct clustroid-center of human thought. Introducing poasterGPT, a GPT-3.5-turbo model fine-tuned on the tweets of
@tszzl, @growing_daniel, @PajeetBateman, and @10x_er.

Try it out for yourself:
https://RyanLucas3.github.io/poasterGPTWeb
The chart at the beginning already shows we don’t fit the trend anymore. So the whole premise is nonsense