skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Given how many simultaneous criminal cases Trump is now defending: yes.

A better example would be Snowden given nobody was done for lying to congress, but even then he changed things by revealing so much.
For me it's the flex-basis, -grow, -shrink that I can never get my head around. But I don't need to worry about that very often (which I guess is why it never really sticks in my head).
Something similar but I learnt only in my high school is this - "few" vs "a few"

few = not very many, with a focus on the fact that this number is (remarkably) small.

"a few" = not very many, but at least more than one.

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/1866/a-few-vs-fe...

My English teacher however taught us this way:

few = zero

a few = more than one
What nonsense are you talking here?

The comment you replied to was the first comment I made in this thread and the only comment in which I wrote that content, this is my third comment in this thread.

Are you always this confused and misguided?
That’s why there are lots of word-of-mouth in some industries. Or at least review websites. Nobody says „trust the mechanics“. More like there few good ones in the sea of average and flat-out fraud.

Meanwhile „trust the X field“ crowd lacks this component. Any field will have frauds and word-of-mouth does not replicate easily.
The page I linked says that visa do 22 transactions for the same carbon footprint. This is really not terribly inefficient - they both use very little energy per transaction and ethereum is much more advanced than visa and a much better platform to build a global financial system on - it can handle arbitrary transactions so I can make atomic transfers, it's credibly neutral to its transactions, its costs are borne by those using it rather than by a rent seeking corporation. Its not a back box - anyone with a good idea can suggest improvements. Besides that, rollups provide further energy savings to the extent that I expect my zksync transactions probably actually use a very similar amount of energy to visa transactions.
I think what’s happening here isn’t really regional at all. It’s a kind of confusion that can happen anywhere within the Anglosphere. We have a word, “couple” which means exactly two things. But unlike “one” or “two”, children don’t tend to ever actually be directly told that “couple” means exactly two things, they just pick it up naturally.

People like playing with language, and use understatement regularly. Unlike “I’ll just have two beers”, where it’s obvious to any child who has learned to count that this is the case, when kids regularly see people around them say “I’ll just have a couple of beers”, they assume couple is another word for an indeterminate small amount like few. When they later learn of other uses of “couple” they assume these are unrelated.
But they continue to dominate in factory automation. Germany too.
For millions of generations there were millions of generations that came to another conclusion and didn’t procreate. And also your assumption that all those millions of generations that you’ve mentioned procreated willingly is false.
It looks like it charged fairly quickly.

eyeballing it from the graph:

1st charge: 35% ~1hr

2nd charge: 90% ~1.5hr

3rd charge: 30% ~30 min

I don't know the battery capacity, but if that was known, you could probably figure out the charging rate.

The first charge looked slower from the slope of the line, the second it charged faster but tapered, and the third time fast too.
You are rich enough that raising a child is no longer a major expense for you, is this not the exception that proves the parent commenter's rule, then? Most are not so lucky as you.
How Jerry Pournelle got kicked off the ARPANET:

http://www.art.net/~hopkins/Don/text/pourne-smut.html
That's funny, because this just came in:

https://apnews.com/article/iphone-15-overheating-apple-softw...
Or they're mentally unsound of some variety.
> Calcium Propionate (To Retard Spoilage)

(Nice euphemism, there. Preservative is a bad word? This deceitful wording should be illegal...)

I don't know food chemsitry, but it looks like they are mostly vitamins, preservatives and softeners/moisturizers. The latter two could be a result of the low density GP suggested: if you go shopping weekly, because Target is far away, the bread needs to feel fresh for a week.

However, added vitamins is either because the ingredients are poor, or to avoid lawsuits from those who expect to survive on only white bread...

> I personally have yet to have an issue eating EU food within EU norms

I noticed this for my favorite dessert: Tiramisu

There are two types of recipes: Mascarpone creme based on whipped egg whites or cream. From my unscientific studies, it looks like European recipes most often use whipped egg whites (eaten raw), while American recipes use whipping cream.
I think the issue wasn't the bug but the lack of care? Pretty much any large system develops bugs during the development but they get noticed and fixed. These bugs got noticed and not fixed.
What general type of company? Need to avoid them like the plague.
AI and brain science are helping perfumiers create fragrances
Try imagining being a prisoner in a soviet psychiatric "hospital"...
Well, monopolistic control is also counter-productive for an economy.
Implying that someone is depressed and need to see therapist because their life vision differs from your is extremely ignorant and offensive. Especially when original point isn’t controversial at all.
> Everyone mocked the Australian PM when he said that the laws of Australia applied in Australia, and not the laws of mathematics ...

Oh come on. That was his flippant response to a smartarse question.
It might be less correct from a taxonomy perspective but why not just a different branch for each change?
A stupid question from a non native English speaker. What’s an outlet with regards to a Café?
I’m single so it’s hard to cook for 1 without re eating the same thing 5 times in a row or having wasted food. Eating out _is_ more expensive but it’s only a bit more expensive and it’s massively more convenient and tastes much better.

I can go out and get a lamb wrap or a Bahn mi for $13 and a 4 minute walk and it’s extremely tasty. I really couldn’t beat that cooking for myself.

If I was cooking for a whole family then the numbers change since it’s about the same effort to cook no matter what quantity.
The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

As soon as you make something easier to optimize, you'll end up spending more than before.

Sometimes you create a lot of value in the process, so it can be a good thing. But its costs has to be taken into account.
That's also how I learnt grouping as a kid !

Context: in HoMM, a turn-based strategy game, you can see wandering "armies" in the world map, but cannot see the exact number of units in these armies unless you spent some points in scouting. What you do have is a verbal description of the army ("several trolls", "lots of faeries", etc.).
Don’t worry, some of us are burdened by this weird feeling called “empathy”. You don’t.
Etymologically there are 3 and 4 way couplings... latin copula just means 'joined', nothing about 2.
This is very similar to my experience. For example, I can visualise 3 stacked poker chips, and I can move than around and restack them. But if I try to make them different colours, I can't, similar to how I might keep track of real ones with me eyes closed. I can remember the blue one is on top, but if I start rotating them, taking the bottom one out and putting it on top, I quickly lose track of which one is which.

I also feel like songs I replay in my head (which I do constantly, and without a choice in the song) have very high fidelity.
Speculators are only able to speculate because at the end of the day there are people that are willing to pay that much. Even if you completely decomodify housing you'll just end up finding new ways to ration it if you don't address the supply issue.
You have conspicuously avoided addressing the specific, systemic human rights abuses unique to China.

Instead, your post employs a series of rhetorical tactics aimed at stifling constructive dialogue:

First, you assert a false equivalency between China and the USA/EU by trivializing the qualitative difference in freedom levels, thereby attempting to normalize authoritarianism.

Second, you use a slippery slope argument about social media moderation to suggest that all limitations on freedom are essentially the same — equating limited, private content moderation with systemic human rights abuses by government.

Third, you engage in an ad hominem attack by accusing me of being influenced by propaganda without providing substantive counter-arguments.

Were I to adopt your approach, I could easily make similar sweeping ad hominem accusations based on your behavior here.
It's such a strange thing to argue that a child who is poor would be better off never to have been born at all—and then to characterize that argument as somehow being in favor of that child's interest.

My point is that a hard-working, upright and moral couple that wants a child should have one even if they are dirt poor, and shouldn't stop themselves because they don't have money. If the child ends up being unhappy in that environment purely as a result of the lack of money, then that is society's failing—our failing—not a failing of the parents'. We haven't done our duty to help this couple raise a happy family.

> In which family did you grow up? Pops and moms were happy campers with middle class income?

This is a strangely personal comment. Is this argument very personal for you? Is there something about your own life that makes you want to deny life to others?
This reminds me of a joke I once read somewhere:

A Polish man and a Russian man were walking on a road when they stumbled upon a treasure chest.

"What a fortune! Let's divide like friends!", exclaimed the Russian.

"Nah, let's just each have a half.", replied the less excited Pole.
My advice to young colleagues: never do anything on a work computer that you wouldn’t mind your boss (or her boss) seeing.

Being greeted with a Department of Defense splash screen before login reminding me that everything I did on that computer was subject to monitoring formed that habit early, and I still can’t shake it, no matter how long I work in Germany, for a German firm with a rather assertive works council.
Pedantic but I would still say it's shameful although expected. Like that it is shameful to have your car stolen if you leave it unlocked with the keys in clear view on the driver's seat, although it is expected.
If you can raise your kid on a median, as in your kid isn’t spoiled and not lacking - you’re good to go.
Humane’s ‘AI Pin’ debuts on the Paris runway
Power outlets so you can charge your laptop/phone.
Yes, and the point is that you need to do that if you want to do that. Diving into big projects prevents you from working on small projects, gaining that experience and establishing those processes.
But thinking about a court case, what should be the presumption? Should it be up to the prosecution to prove that the RAID controller / network card didn't corrupt the data or that the GPU did the math correctly? Or should it be up to the defense to prove that it didn't? And how would each side demonstrate their case to a reasonable level of certainty?

As others in this thread have said, for bits of the system that have clearly defined parameters and get extensive testing (by like, millions of people), I think you can begin with the assumption that those bits are correct: you can assume the CPU is adding numbers correctly, that the compiler compiled the code correctly, that the spreadsheet executed the formula it was given correctly, and it's up to the defense to prove otherwise. Bugs in the CPU / compiler / spreadsheet software would get caught pretty quickly.

But for bits where the right answer is not clear, and / or doesn't get extensive testing -- the formulas inside the spreadsheet, custom-written software -- the assumption should be that it does not work, and it should be up to the prosecution to demonstrate that the software is working correctly.
Don't AMD server class processors have some way to encrypt VM memory so the host can't read it?

Looking around quickly, it seems to be Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV):

https://www.amd.com/en/developer/sev.html
Julian Assange, currently being chemically lobotomized in one of the Wests' most heinously vile palaces of torture - without trial, without justice - would like you to very carefully reconsider your position with regards to political dissidents.

So would Australias Witnesses J, K, L, M, N and O .. who have been disappeared into a military Star Court, for the sake of political dissidence.

Be very careful with your castigation of China. We have far, far more political dissidents in our prisons than you know about. And that is by design.
But is this not a prime example of gatekeeping?
I heard the same thing from a colleague from Brazil, I can imagine that after containing inflation there are many more problems left to solve that are probably not taken care of either in Brazil.
If it can interface an external memory, and given enough time, it presumably can do just about anything any other CPU can
I wish we had the option to specify explicit captures in rust closures too. When you need it you need it, and it is good for clarity. The current "add `move` to switch from by-reference to by-value" is too coarse grained
Assuming it's provenance can be established, does it not undermine the legal case since it included a conspiracy to lie under oath (as I understand it, but perhaps I misread) as a serious proposal from his litigation funder, and explicit threats to withdraw backing?

I find the idea of threatening somebody to prove they are the holder of billions of dollars of electronic assets and a massive tax liability quite strange.
Always nice to be able to see the world so clearly black and white (btw., cigarettes have many hundreds of years of history you seem to ignore).
Maybe these comments should simply be shown below the other ones?
Eating out in Tokyo really is cheaper than the COL would imply. $8 will get you a nice set meal at a sit down restaurant, all included, and tip doesn't exist.
You're looking at it. The hamburger menu on the left lets you navigate the chapters.
Opening up ChatGPT: tracking “open source” LLM and RLHF architectures
Incredibly bad practice.

This type of behaviour would illegal in many jurisdictions with the basics of employee protection. However, in at will jurisdictions, there is little can be done other than for employees to have to suffer it. I am sorry for your experience, I wish you better luck in your next opportunity
Yes, but in the English derivation of the Latin, it explicitly means two.
I think you might be misreading some of these comments. I also wonder if you are aware of the history of eugenicist ideas in the west, and how enmeshed those concepts are in many every-day attitudes about who should be having children—often without people understanding the history (and original intention) of policies they espouse. I am not advancing any kind of conspiracy theory here.

And I think you misrepresent the potential harm. Anti-natalists don't just want to forgo having children. Many anti-natalists also want to discourage or prevent other people from having children. In fact, I'm sure many people making anti-natalist comments here do intend to have children themselves—they just want to discourage or prevent other people they find undesirable from having kids.
Have not read the article, but I think "Big Tobacco" is something of a scapegoat for a larger pattern, and basically they were just unlucky enough to produce one of the most harmful products (recognized as such once the health bills started coming due).

(edit - I may add the product probably wouldn't be so harmful if people kept their consumption to under five cigarettes a day.)
Is public WiFi a thing in NY these days?

In Sweden you'd just sit down and use your phone as a proxy. It is usually much faster, and also much safer.

I live in a smaller town. Maybe the crowdiness of Manhattan is the issue?
You would be much more credible if you said how China is “bad” (which is a moral judgement anyway).

Instead you jumped straight to calling anyone who might disagree “uninformed”, a “shill”, and finally you admitted that you don’t understand how someone can hold a different view than you.

It doesn’t inspire confidence in your analytical ability.
Maybe I'm weird, but I have a very real auditory experience of music playing in my head. I'm never confused whether I'm imagining it, but it has nearly the same fidelity as hearing with my ears.

I can't conjure up smell/taste experiences the same way, but I do have a sort of hollow visualization ability.

Edit: I read a few more comments, and it seems I'm not alone! Now I wonder whether this is common in the general population or just HN.
My mom continues to buy heavily processed food. My dad periodically tries to nag her about eating healthier, but she takes that as a personal attack. She does eat veggies and fruit, but she also likes rice a roni (as do I- it tastes great, but I don’t buy it myself).

If you want to eat healthfully on the go, it generally means that you have to bring food along and ideally cook it, too. It is hard to do.
Good idea! Tactic adopted.
How is Nim for mobile development?
Redonda: Tiny Caribbean island’s transformation to wildlife haven
I guess for sending parches using git tooling instead of an email client works best. At least according to https://git-send-email.io/
> I get the impression Apple openly encourages (and maybe even requires) it.

To take nudes?
Does anybody remember Google People
They weren't "lifted". They stopped their policies, lasseize faire, and the market took care of the rest. Now they're back at it again, impeding.
It’s naive to think this is about child-abuse. That’s just there to frame the discussion.
Interpol is not going to stop at analyzing images for csam - it’s not even the real goal. The goal is complete government oversight.

And no I am not into conspiracy theories. It’s same as with attempts at “breakable encryption”, it’s offered up under the guise of fighting child-abuse/terrorism/<insert-terrible-thing-everybody-has-to-agree-is-terrible>, but the goal is to increase government access to all communications between civilians.
But if this is true, then they should complain about the word "black" rather than about the capital "B".
Why is a hobby shallow but the creation of life deep? Surely that depends on the hobby as well. Having a child can be seen, in one aspect, as a very expensive and time consuming hobby.

What is so special about creating life, anyway?
$1 megabuck per year is roughly 4-5 developers and nobody else.

Yes, you can argue that some developers would work for less than that, but any programmers capable of generating a good game can then go get jobs somewhere else.

And you need art assets. And music assets. And sound effects. And ...

This is why there is no "middle". Earning $5 million on a game (not $5 million per year--$5 million total) is absurdly successful on Steam.
the lack of people who openly talk about regretting having kids as that's not socially acceptable

I am always surprised when I see people post about the regret of having children. You are right: It is pretty rare.
We have "more layers" in some states of Australia.

For example, here in the state of New South Wales, we have the New South Wales Police (our state police – Australia doesn't have independent local police forces, only federal and state/territory police), who are policed by the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (LECC), who in turn are policed by the Inspector of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (ILECC), who in turn is policed by the NSW Ombudsman. And all three of the LECC, the ILECC, and the Ombudsman are accountable to the Parliamentary Joint Committee.

It isn't a perfect system and it doesn't solve everything, but it is better than not having it.

I think having so many independent local police forces in the US increases the risk of politicisation and corruption. If the Australian model was adopted (no independent local police, only state police), it would lead to greater professionalism and professional leadership, who would be less likely to engage in these kind of outrageous abuses, and face greater consequences if they did
That could be of the transactions, innodb will keep your data reads intact (of that is not of importance, if the update is more important than the result based on the current state of the data, for example with
UPDATE SET field = field + 1)

You could maybe have matched with a change in the transaction isolation level for innodb
Of course it is. You didn’t pick that up from the time of my comment?

I think we’re discussing this from different dimensions. You’re talking from some abstract concept of family and society relationship and I’m talking from a real word experience of growing up poor.
It sucks, big time. So don’t start rationalizing suffering of millions growing up poor as “we’ve failed them, oh well, back to the drawing board!”
werror is absolutely your friend. The examples given in the article are borderline strawmen.

Changing toolchains is a very rare occurrence because the subtle differences will almost always cause problems. When someone suggests changing toolchains, they owe everyone a VERY CONVINCING argument. After which the changed warnings will be the LEAST of your problems as you migrate.

Toolchain upgrades will cause new warnings to surface as the detection gets better. But you DO want to fix them, don't you? You ARE a professional, aren't you? You DO care about your product's quality, don't you?

After over a decade without werror, followed by a decade with werror, I'd take werror every time. Warnings exist for a reason, and in the case of C compilers, VERY GOOD reasons that you really should address.

At my workplace, we use werror, static analysis, various lints, detekt... everything that can issue warnings about your code quality. If any of them complain, you can't merge your PR, because we're professionals.
Nostalgia speaking, while it was a great OS for its time, deadlocks were a common issue.
I'll add another thing someone pointed out. The difference between General Motors circa 1955 and Google circa 2020.

General Motors indirect economic effects were huge and larger than the company itself. Lots and lots of businesses and people were employed indirectly.

Google, nothing, bupkis, they're totally extractive on the rest of the economy. Most of the towns and cities in the US google doesn't employ anyone directly or indirectly. And the places they do they distort the economy in bad ways.
To be honest I never really compared airport food because I barely eat when traveling so I'll concede this one.
Cost of housing. If you can work remote why pay SF/NY prices.
Taking this to absurdity you can create a new obfuscated program for each case that presumes guilt based on whatever evidence is could be in principle be decided with a computer, maximizing the burden on the defendants.

Maybe another principle would be that a program is assumed to function as proven in the past. The further a given program is shown prior to be correct, the more the burden of proof shifts to the defendant to show otherwise.
I am from Asia. If you think America is bad , wait till China becomes the number one power.You will realize the difference between a bully and a hitler
It is a standard feature of an ECE, FIM or even Snell rated helmet. Even modular helmets have the same chinbar testing as full face helmets.

I can't speak for DOT helmets, since that standard is untrustable for a variety of reasons anyway.
We had someone submit their current employers code as a solution to the assignment. It had the company’s name all over in namspaces, etc. It was also not what we asked for, but something only slightly related. Their employer was making medical devices.