skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This post is too old for me to determine if this had been intended as sarcasm, or had been a serious suggestion. Could any human associate help me with this task? /s
I dunno, scooters and bikes have mechanical brakes so there is no need to bail to begin with.

Sliding is rare, true. But at high speeds is the only way to stop. At low speeds I do agree, but the issue is that footbraking requires balance, and even people decent at long boarding can lose control while footbraking.

My main argument against longboard is that there’s no way to stop at high speeds and that steering inherently requires shifting your weight in a way that makes you vulnerable.

This is not to say that no one should longboard, but personally I only do so on flat terrain now.
Is 12 junior dev-days a lot of money for a software development tool? A single junior dev costs 20x as much per year. Is having 5% more junior devs on your team better than better tooling for the other 95% of the team?

I can see how it might be a impediment for tinkering and hobbyists, but it is a pittance for any commercial usage.
How sad, to fall through the cracks in such a spectacular way.

There have been so many appeals for help and obvious missed-test cases posted here by people. I can only dread the number of people who will experience such horrible fates again when there is another world war.

Services and systems for which no user-accessible help exists, completely automated interfaces designed by people without knowledge of the end users actual use and only through public outcry is an operator directed to edit some database manually or restore someones account or access to funds.
Linux and nvidia have had a strained relationship, nvidia did announce they are finally open sourcing the driver mid-2022 (partially iirc?) so your experience may be better now since nvidia is kinda playing nice but I haven't check the progress on it.
When you rally people over Twitter to come to an issue on an open-source project, it's A) out of band, and B) being a jerk.

> And no matter how many contributions he’s made, it’s always been Supnik’s project.

Basically the overwhelming majority of all work for the last 15 years has been him.
Here in Barcelona these things are super common. The riders seem to be pretty adept. The problem is more that they don't care about pedestrians, they zoom around while on their phones on the pavement where they're not allowed and zip around pedestrians way too fast.

I don't care if they kill themselves but they're risking other people's safety more.
Never touched one, but FWIW it's the only thing I see daily that feels like the future.

That being said, I literally only see one, and it's the same one, there's a kid who commutes to my kids school every day in a suburban area.
Not sure the service could afford it. 250 episodes/year times 60 years is 15_000 episodes to license.
World’s Smallest Nerf Gun Shoots an Ant [video]
You’re right, I should have said restructuring.

Jubilees are a crude predecessor to lawful restructuring.
Do LLMs purposely waffle on to increase token usage and therefore revenue?
FLStudio lets you save a new incremental version with CTRL+N, I use that as a sort of version control so I can roll back to an older version of an ideas if needed. Doesn't provide any equivalent of merging with head or branching or anything but it gets the job done for my needs.
See also the Ferrous Systems announcement about AdaCore leaving their previous Rust partnership : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37711274
Carbon credits are so incredibly cheap, and in most cases completely voluntary, that I genuinely don't believe they have impacted anyone's behavior. Companies and individuals that buy credits either were already planning on reducing their emissions (so in the best case the credits are useless), or don't want to reduce emissions and are using the credits for PR purposes to delay any actual reduction and call themselves "net zero".

Even when they're legally mandated, most credits are completely unverifiable (what ratings agency will be able to certify that a tree you sponsored will last 100 years). It is actively harmful to allow someone to say that since they paid $10 to plant a tree that may or may not absorb a ton of carbon over the next century, that offsets the literal ton of carbon that they just emitted yesterday (and made a lot more than $10 off of). Just tax the carbon and put the proceeds towards ecological restoration, that accomplishes the same thing without letting anyone falsely claim they have offset their emissions, and allows the government to set the price to something meaningful.
That's already a condition for many governments/grants/etc. The publishers are ok with it because they just put an open-access surcharge of a few hundred to a few thousand dollars per article.
Ultimately this is what the American people want and they express this through the selection of their elected representatives. Perhaps public servants who expend efforts to find compromise before things get bad are punished by being replaced by more "exciting" candidates.
Even just once would be near proof, assuming care was taken to ensure the secret didn't "leak" somehow. Maybe have an open-minded neighbor put a sticky note on the wall by his bed. If you find the number, you'll know it's real.
Really? Like you literally see the things you imagine?

How do you function? How do you manage to drive, without your thoughts blocking your view? How can you even tell if anything you see is real or a product of your imagination?

I feel like if that's what is actually happening you should see a professional.
"Totally untrue"?

Just face the facts...https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/nuclear-renewables-electr... it's over.

> If those economics change

How are those economics supposed to change? Prices for renewables keep on falling, while those for nuclear never stopped rising.

You should come up with some sources for those claims far away from reality...

And what "fuckup" is this supposed to be? Germany build 7.9 Megawatt only solar in 7 months this year, and it's just the beginning after 16 years of stagnation. Wake up.

https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/technologie/stromproduk...

https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/energiemonitor-deutschland-ga...
I'd be happy too,it's mostly templates: project templates, individual fx presets, fx chain templates for corrections, sweetening and mastering, export/render prsets, filename templates, And lots of keystroke macros that help me speed up my work. Things like specific keystrokes for punch and roll, quick edits and ripple delete. It's an amalgamation of lots of small optimizations. Reaper is also really good at UI customization, so you can hide grids, measures ,snapping, and really optimize things. ChatGPT is also reasonably good at writing Lua scripts for reaper called ReaScript that can leverage the API for automations more complex than what you can do with SWS additions to the immense actions list. If you have something specific, feel free to reach out directly. I love this stuff.
>but two people riding down a steep hill on a single bike would have been a really rare -- if not practically impossible -- occurrence before the advent of e-bikes

Really? Ten seconds on google: https://www.vintag.es/2015/11/lovely-vintage-photos-of-coupl...
Ariely's book "Predictably irrational" was an absolutely delightful, short, pop-science read. It so clearly and usefully condensed science into tidbits you could sprinkle into intellectual conversation or incorporate into your lifestyle. Turns out the science behind it might just be trash, but since I repeated the BS in the same unwarranted confidence, people never questioned me.
What would a DAW-diff look (sound?!) like though...
Though surely any sort of XML (or JSON etc.) based format would be fine for using along with git etc.
I remember from my days building SIP clients that a lot of carriers support 933, which is exactly what you're asking about. You can try googling a bit to see if your carrier supports it.
Sounds absurd and abusive to me. Companies should feel pressure to have good perks such as useful education that could be used elsewhere and if they can't retain people they certainly don't deserve a kick back for sucking.

I don't want to play in a job market with parasitic companies full of indentured servants who are afraid to demand the wage correspond to their role.
https://www.gnu.org/software/gnat/
I had a good laugh with a co-worker a few weeks back when we saw a chick wearing sunglasses with her hands deep in her hoody pockets riding a similar single-wheeled vehicle at an intersection. Looking cool trumps common sense for certain personality types.
Laravel has wayyy too much built in to consider using vanilla PHP. To me the question is rather why would you want to use vanilla PHP?
I'm well aware the physics is just 'natural philosophy', that doesn't make it anymore reasonable to start using it as the tool for metaphysics. It's a clear category error, like trying to use food chemistry to elucidate cognitive psychology in a literal sense.
There's always nuclear.
Agree. I'll also say it's a lot further away than your comment implies. Once ChatGPT4 can add metonymy by itself in a random discussion, talking about consciousness in silicon can be interesting.
They way you sell it, I gotta say, even if it's all imagination I want to try it.
Agree.

Even with this

> since his military service had been continuous, his decades of accumulated unpaid salary were paid in full

It’s still nothing, compared to having been locked away in a foreign country for almost his whole adult life :(
This article feels so wildly "stereotypical Victorian/Puritan."

We now have these small devices that contain dangerous ideas, they are called BOOKS And they must be stopped!
Conscious awareness appears to be a fundamental aspect of the universe -- as fundamental as the four known fundamental forces -- and physics is concerned with describing the laws of the universe.

How could consciousness not be lumped in with physics, from this perspective?

It doesn't matter whether consciousness pervades the universe in a form of panpsychism, or is emergent out of interactions we already understand. Fluid mechanics is emergent too, in a sense -- that doesn't put it outside of physics.
I find that I visualize things vaguely/abstractly by default but I can put a bit of effort in thinking about the detail of the object I'm trying to imagine and then I can see that detail.

So I might imagine an Apple as a circle but if I need it in more detail, I put more effort into it, recalling the detail and able to see the red, the stem, peel it with a small knife, add a chunk taken out because it was bitten, etc.
The Wikipedia page doesn't give juicy information. I think we can go to [1].

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/sep/19/1
It is quite clear, from his own work, that Goff is just casting around to find something about science and the scientific method which might account for a belief (that consciousness is not a physical phenomenon) that he has come to by other means. This view is intrinsic to a doctrine of "Russellian Monism" which asserts that the physical sciences can only talk of the relationship between entities, and not their intrinsic natures.

How Goff hopes to discover anything substantive about supposed intrinsic natures that do not reveal themselves by participating in relations, or how they can account for consciousness apparently being causal in the physical world, has not been revealed to us by him, or anyone else.
That is not a bed, that's just a flat and fucking uncomfortable surface

Would you really want to stay on a surface with no barriers for you to block from falling down while sick?

Turn around and you will be thankful for the medical staff already present
Surely it’s possible to build some benchmark to demonstrate the difference right? Otherwise, what’s the point of making that improvement in the first place?

I think what you’re saying though is that having benchmarks/micro benchmarks that are cheap to run is valuable and in those instruction counts may be the only way to measure a 5% improvement (you’d have to run the test for a whole lot longer to prove that a 5% instruction count improvement is a real 1% wall clock improvement and not just noise). Even criterion gets real iffy about small improvements and it tries to build a statistical model.
I agree about the MagPi; it's close. I think it would work great as eh, toilet reading material though. Lots of small stories/projects.
First Google now Palantir, I'm quite worried to see what privacy and ethical violations end up happening.
Chemistry has its roots in alchemy, but that doesn't mean alchemy deserves to be treated with the same respect and seriousness as chemistry.

Medicine has its roots in witchcraft but that doesn't mean witchcraft deserves to be treated with the same respect and seriousness as medicine.

Astronomy has its roots in astrology, but that doesn't mean astrology deserves to be treated with the same respect and seriousness as astronomy.

Philosophy isn't physics, and philosophy doesn't deserve to be treated like physics. The premise that panpsychism - which is essentially the basis for all animist and shamanic religions (the belief that all things have an innate mind or will) should be treated as a peer to relativity or quantum mechanics is absurd.

I mean, quoting directly from TFA:

Part of the appeal of panpsychism is that it appears to provide a workaround to the question posed by Chalmers: we no longer have to worry about how inanimate matter forms minds because mindedness was there all along, residing in the fabric of the universe. Chalmers himself has embraced a form of panpsychism and even suggested that individual particles might be somehow aware. He said in a TED Talk that a photon “might have some element of raw, subjective feeling, some primitive precursor to consciousness.”

We're to take seriously, as a scientific claim, that individual particles are aware and have feelings. That when a ball rolls downhill, it's because the ball wants to roll downhill. That when it rains, it's because Mother Earth weeps. It isn't gatekeeping to reject such nonsense, it's simply garbage collection.
In digital circuits the “frequency” when the lumped model breaks down is determined by the slew-rate (ie. spectral content of the edges), not the bitrate/clock frequency. In the electronics hobbyist community there are many cases when you can run into that issue head first while just connecting modules together (because the whatever IC on the module has significantly faster slew-rate than you need). Another example are MCUs with somewhat high internal clock rates and their power requirements, even 20-ish year old dsPIC requires somewhat involved supply decoupling topology to work at all (and the quality of decoupling for ESP32 has direct effect on signal quality and how much of RF noise it spews out).
I’m not going to validate the profession by caring how it’s spelt, nor do I care for nit picky responses like yours.
So you're saying that Russia under sanctions is not weaker than it would be otherwise?

Crippling the Russian economy, their ability to project power and the living conditions for middle class Russians (at the end of the day they are to blame for the war) seem like good things.

> don't see the idiocy

Please do suggest any less 'idiotic' options?

> effect of letting the world know that we wield economic power as a weapon

I guess it's still preferable to nukes and carpet bombing (which were necessary the last time fascist imperialism was left unchecked...)
New Smart Glasses Have ChatGPT Integration, and They Look Normal
To me, the quote and your questions seem like different concepts

Regarding your questions:

There is a difference between intellectual knowledge and experience

Sometimes the concept of gnosis is used to differentiate them

So for example, you can read a book about riding a bike, maybe the book is very detailed and tells you everything there is to “know” about riding a bike, but unless you actually ride a bike, you can never “truly know” (experience) what riding a bike is

Now regarding our perception and the universe:

We live in the universe, we are part of it, we can’t ever separate ourselves from it

Then how would we ever be able to remove our perception from it? It’s impossible to truly know

Of course we can speculate and we can come up with endless ideas, but we can never truly know anything that we don’t experience

In that sense, even our ideas are mediated through our inner perception of them

And of course this is my own subjective perception of my reality, as it is all I have
New and improved way to review GitHub pull requests for snaps
Lex Fridman talked to Mark Zuckerberg about this just a few days ago [0]. It didn't sound like Meta is has good answers for how this should be done. So it seems unlikely that they'd be significantly more than 6 months into research like this (as the tweet chain says). It seems like Meta is exploring AI avatars, but for much more practical, menial tasks.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVYrJJNdrEg&t=1994s
This feels like wishful-thinking rather than having any basis in reality. Many SaaS providers with _Contact Us_ pricing are market leaders.
The police are still very much targeting minorities and the justice system still gives harsher sentences to minorities for the same crime.

Police stop minorities in most major cities and profile. As far as weed enforcement by the federal government, as long as it’s the law, it can still be reintroduced. While Trump himself didn’t care to enforce it, his first AG very much wanted to but was stymied by a bipartisan unwillingness to fund it. But selective enforcement is still dangerous.

Who do you think a Desantis administration or a Pence administration would go after?

Google sells nothing of value at any meaningful scale - but ads.

You want to see a “million ad tech companies bloom”?

Yes you have complete agency not to use Google and they don’t even have a monopoly on advertising
It’s amazing how little we know about how others dream and visualize:

Do you see 3d or 2d?
Is there smells?
Are there color?
Is there sound?
Do people talk?
Can you feel touch?
> Conscious awareness appears to be a fundamental aspect of the universe -- as fundamental as the four known fundamental forces -- and physics is concerned with describing the laws of the universe.

Why do you believe this to be true?

If it's a self-evident observation, try explaining it to me like I'm 5.
The gamut of human capability when crashing vehicles is SO MUCH larger than most people realize. The average bike commuter probably has a much higher chance of injury in a solo crash than someone who's skated for decades on a onewheel. When I see discussions of safety I rarely see "get good at crashing" brought up, but it's such an important skill.

When I ride my bike I'm always hopping up curbs at speed, doing quick whip skids/ted shreds etc, not just because it's fun, but because those are the skills you need to stay alive in abnormal situations. It's honestly kind of baffling to me that most people don't actively work on expanding their safety envelope.

You can get good at crashing, and at avoiding crashes, and when you do you can either do the same things safer, or do more fun things with the same level of safety. This is why Alex Honnold isn't dead (yet).
I confess I don't have a very social life, but I don't know what makes strava bad from the social ideas, there. That is to say, if it is just the social you don't like, can't you just not follow anyone?
Chinese, Japanese, and Korean would be the languages I need more often than Western languages. This is usually because there is often an English variant of sites in EU, even sites in India.
And cloudflare already knew what site you were visiting. It's not like they only know it if you use ECH.
Of course Russia doesn’t want NATO expansion! It makes us (NATO. Yes, "us.") stronger and them weaker. It is manifestly opposed to their stated interests of encroaching on territories they wrongly view as theirs. That's precisely why NATO needs to expand. So, naturally, we shouldn’t ever do what our adversary wants us to not do, right?

I would have loved to see the consequences if this kind of attitude had ultimately prevailed in WW2. Was the allied fortification of Britain a provocation too? If it was, was it not a necessary one?
>How do you manage to drive, without your thoughts blocking your view?

They don't block the view, in the same way that the image from your left eye doesn't block the image from your right eye, even though they're overlaid on the same "mental space". Hold up your finger in front of your eyes, and focus on a distant object. You can see two images of the finger, but also see straight through them simultaneously. It's kinda like that.

And it usually doesn't manifest when I'm intensely concentrating on one task (unless deliberately imagining something is part of how I solve the task). At any rate, driving is mostly a system 1 activity, carried out autonomically. In real life, people's thoughts drift all the time when they drive. It's unavoidable and mostly not a big deal.

>How can you even tell if anything you see is real or a product of your imagination?

Because they're on different channels. Like stdout vs stderr.

>I feel like if that's what is actually happening you should see a professional.

Again, most people are like this. You are the one who is unusual. You probably have aphantasia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphantasia

It's common for aphantasics to be initially completely incredulous at the concept of mental imagery, so you're not alone here. See this: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/baTWMegR42PAsH9qJ/generalizi...

>Galton gave people some very detailed surveys, and found that some people did have mental imagery and others didn't. The ones who did had simply assumed everyone did, and the ones who didn't had simply assumed everyone didn't, to the point of coming up with absurd justifications for why they were lying or misunderstanding the question. There was a wide spectrum of imaging ability, from about five percent of people with perfect eidetic imagery1 to three percent of people completely unable to form mental images
>When a philosophy has enough proofs and credibility, it becomes a science

I completely disagree with this notion of science. To me science is the practice of analysing findings from controlled experimentation and then deriving predictive, reproducible and falsifiable hypotheses.
The great thing about CI is that it implies less is more. Don't do anything elaborate, don't memorize, don't practice grammar, just consume media you understand.

I'm at a somewhat intermediate level, so mainly I am just watching The Mandalorian, Clone Wars, etc, in Spanish with Spanish subtitles. I'll often repeat a phrase or sentence into Google Translate, or repeat it into ChatGPT mobile and ask for a grammatical explanation or if the phrase is colloquial.

I do copy transcribed phrases I like, so I can read them again later. That's all the review I do and is more than necessary.

I've also signed up for News in Slow Spanish but not sure how much that adds over watching TV tbh.

In a few months I'll think about adding conversational practice in some way.
iOS AppStore Auto-update does NOT automatically update apps
Excellent. Now let’s shrink it and reduce the consumption of those left.
> How are those economics supposed to change?

With better technology. Again, we agree that right now we should be deploying solar and wind. But because it’s cheapest. The anti-nukes didn’t win, economics did. (Again, case in point Germany versus America.)