skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Works if people aren’t coming in every day. We have set days where certain teams come in. You’ll be sitting next to the people you work with and the company doesn’t need as many desks
I don't know if there are alternative clients, but default ui is messy as f. I don't care about functionnality if just searching for stuff is so terrible.
I use a random one [1], when I remember. Type what I need in english and press Ctrl-G:

~/ git clean branch⌛ (ctrl-g gives me the little hourglass)

wait for a second and the command line is replaced:

~/ git clean -f -d && git checkout branch

Of course when the result is not what you want, might as well open the browser...

[1] https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt
> but a key-value store is a thing

DynamoDB underpins much of AWS which in turn underpins a ridiculous number of web services.

So definitely more than just a thing.
It can't. But it's not the software's fault leadership & management and their organizations still believe it can.

Most don't seem to grasp there's a delta between saying you have a Proj Mgmt tool, and using it. Ideally, using it properly. A SaaS PM tool is not a substitute for actual management. The tool enables the management of projects (read: ultimately that's actually people). The tool does manage itself. And the tool doesn't mean staff can lead and manage themselves either.

Like the article's writer I've traveled across a number of agencies the last 8+ years. It's rare to see the software used correctly. That said, it's also rare to see Project Managers and teams properly do PM. Half-ass'ing it is not the road map to success. It might feel ok in the immediate but the corner-cutting is self-defeating.

Feels good + Faster !== More effective

p.s. Recently, I worked for a client that used Asana. Kinda. Sorta. I logged any / all relevant activity in Asana. When I submitted my first invoice they asked, "Where is the detail?" I replied, "Invoices are the summary of the work. The blow by blow details were logged and tracked in Asana." They didn't get it.

Hate the players, not the tools.
Does pixel have forced updates? Samsung phones do.
Woman seriously injured after being struck by Cruise autonomous car
There is a reason why they don't want to have it examined.
Not quite. There can be non-deterministic race conditions, and strange head size and sequence length requirements.
Discord is where the creative energy is right now, for better or for worse.
Thanks, maybe I should let it go. My iPhone 4s has been using iOS 9 if not mistaken.
More generally:

Use of any abstraction (or software / management tool) = you exchange one set of problems for another.

This applies in daily life too:

You can mow the lawn, which takes your time / effort. Or you can hire someone to mow the lawn for you.

If you do, you exchange [spending time mowing the lawn] with [spend time to find a gardener + obtain money to pay him/her].

Which to choose? The set of problems that's easiest to handle. If you're short on cash but have the time, mow the lawn yourself. If you're a busy person with a 5-figure salary, pay someone to do it for you.

In programming (or more generally, IT projects) it works the same. But where it often goes wrong, is (usually under-) estimating the nature & size of a set of problems that another set of problems is exchanged with.

"Ooh we should move to the cloud! Flexible compute & storage, easy!". Result: "cloud" is yet another dependency, and turns out to bring complexity in itself. And problems (+costs) attached to it, may just be nastier ones than if things had been kept on-site.

So the art is not always to determine what's an optimal solution (for whatever measure of "optimal"), but to get an accurate picture of the sets of problems you're choosing between.

Sometimes it's wise to pick a sub-optimal solution, if it means picking a set of problems you understand. Versus a 'better' solution whose problems you don't understand (as well).

Or go with something that doesn't work great, but works now, and good enough. Vs one that works great, but only after you needed it.
It was extremely frustrating to see several articles saying that make the rounds on HN...
The data is what the women did, and the fact that it is illegal for men to leave, and that women and children comprise 90% of the war refugees.

It is circumstantial, but it is not a big leap to assume that both women and men would prefer to avoid violence at a similar rate.

I think it is a bigger assumption that men and women would have different preferences about fleeing violence.
Not a chance! Maybe you need a better setup? Or perhaps you haven’t had to commute? Or deal with office aircon? Or hot desking?
Before the real compounding begins, the AI bubble must burst.
Looks visually quite similar to Actual[0][1][2] (open-source, local-first). Did one influence the other? Are they both inspired by some other budget software?

[0] https://actualbudget.com/

[1] https://github.com/actualbudget/actual

[2] https://github.com/actualbudget/actual/blob/d1e57340b88960d0...
>> A lot of couples wind up arguing about who really said what.

I try to get as much relationship decision making as possible done via SMS text or email.

And the moment there is a discussion/argument that turn to “what you said/what I said”, I say I’m only willing to talk about tangible facts, not conversation recollections.
They can be broken uo so that the entity making the browser is not the same entity operating the search engine anymore. If course, the same would apply to Edge and Bing.
As an alternative approach you can use an empty data URL to get an empty favicon:

<link rel="icon" type="image/svg+xml" href="data:image/svg+xml," />