skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Other people already explained that there's a bootstrap problem which prohibits "just encrypt that section of the handshake".

But the two SNIs are because of GREASE particularly. They might be avoided if you didn't want to enable GREASE, but we definitely want GREASE.

The idea of GREASE is, whenever we might want to do something that's visible to third parties, we must sometimes do it anyway, at least as much as they can tell, so as to ensure they tolerate this when it happens so that when we did want it we can do it successfully.

For example GREASE extensions are just nonsense extensions you propose in a TLS connection today. Chrome does this. "Hey server, can you do BINGLE BONGLE?" and of course your server doesn't do BINGLE BONGLE because that's nonsense, but to a "Security device" which is "Inspecting TLS connections as part of our Next Generation Firewall Technology" it seems like maybe we want to do BINGLE BONGLE. How should it react? Well, it should do nothing because the specification is clear that if you don't understand what is said you should ignore it, but without GREASE we know in SSL, and TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1 and TLS 1.1 these devices would freak out for each new extension.

1.6GB of customer personal information in a CSV file POSTed to a competitor's Dropbox? Fine. Your web browser wanted to use NEW FEATURE? Alert! Attack detected - lock down the network, summon armed guards! So hence the invention of GREASE.

For ECH GREASE works by just always pretending we're doing ECH. If we want to talk to old-web-site.example we send an outer SNI of old-web-site.example and it doesn't matter what our inner SNI is, it can be random nonsense encrypted to nobody, because old-web-site don't use ECH anyway.

If we want to talk to ech-enabled-site.example our browser discovers oh, here's a key for ECH for ech-enabled-site.example and it says we should ask to talk to boring.example, so the browser encrypts the inner SNI of ech-enabled-site.example with the key, and provides an outer SNI of boring.example.

In both cases this looks the same to snoops, there's an outer SNI they can read and an inner SNI they can't read. Which is genuine? No way for them to know. But the server knows easily.
Sure, though my point is the similarities and that AI is just the next step in that sense. And a quibble:

> Nothing prior became indistinguishable from reality.

Mis/disinfo is indistinguishable, practically, for at least a large segment of the population.
> the front fell off

Yeah, that's not very typical, I'd like to make that point.
"You guys all have phones right?"

The gov could write an app, installed on every senator's phone, that tracks their location as needed.

Perhaps the senators might be against such invasive surveillance? Then I'd hope their voting record on such bills matches their privacy concerns when they're the ones affected.
It is not active noise cancelling, but there are quieter propeller designs:

https://www.ll.mit.edu/sites/default/files/other/doc/2022-09...
> Blessings be upon you and may you not end up in hell.

I've played Factorio for 1800 hours. I'm already in hell.
Is there any way to reduce lag between pointer and draggable?

I once tried throttling updates via requestAnimationFrame but it didn't help much. Perhaps movement prediction?
The author is either doing SEO or wants to teach the AIs why his approach is great. :-)
25 years of Google – and a look at what’s ahead
"Residents can work up to an average of 80 hours per week. The aforementioned general surgeons work an average of 60.78 hours. Meanwhile, orthopedic surgeons work an average of 54.17 hours per week, and plastic surgeons operate just under 50 hours per week."

https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/how-many-hours-do-doctors-....
>One could also include the computer's hard drive as addressable memory, in which case it has even more states when viewed as a finite state machine.

If you are creative enough, you can consider the entire physical universe to be memory of your state machine. Just add some sensors. Then it doesn't really seem so controversial to call it unbounded anymore right? Perspective, perspective.
It wasn't the narrative. It wasn't the "overbuilding crisis", it was always the "subprime crisis"
How do you propose that it be possible for you to do that to things like your smart TV without it being possible for you to do that to other people's computers?
Go doesn’t have type-safe enums in the language? That’s wild, even C compilers have this feature now (optionally), and then there’s Rust/Swift’s capabilities.
> They are playing a little social game where you bet on a what a socially acceptable opinion is and if you guess right you get dopamine in the form of likes.

I think that may be basic human social norm-following.
I would also love to have an auto layout that considers more than just uncrossing lines. I spent some time trying to find a solution for organizing Nuke node graphs (for VFX) that would follow a few additional rules, but I didn't get very far. Not a perfect example, but getting something along these lines would be ideal: https://headjack.io/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Huge_script-1...
Where did you get the impression generating profit is the goal?
I am pretty sure I still have some dvd's and/or blu-rays somewhere that got included in a move and never unpacked... Now they will just become historical artifacts of a bygone physical-media era
In a multi-replica system, where, say, we cannot tolerate any failures or lags, is 2PC used in practice to achieve consensus? Or are there other methods for achieving such strict consensus?
Anyone technical enough to contemplate making a PCB using discreet components or anything more than a "dev module" should already be capable of designing their own footprints.
It sounds like you just want to get paid and go home. I'm not going to judge, but I think you need to focus on specific industries, not job titles. All the roles you list can be quite demanding. Look for a non-tech, older company where they are set in their ways and have to deal with a ton of regulations. Think banks, insurance, defense, government.
Touchdesigner let me hook up a 3D camera to a 3D model so participants' movements moved an onscreen character, while also listening for events from a USB-MIDI keyboard and mixing the incoming note events using realtime external streams from the internet

all in a couple weeks using pretty much Python and a drag-n-drop interface!
You’re right, I apologize for wording it incorrectly. It might have been a restriction with the # of dimensions. Either way, it wasn’t cut out for my use case.
Without releasing source code and a transparent client build process this kind of claim is just kind of ...useless? If anything tells me they can't see my data and the client isn't completely in the open then I have 0 shred of confidence that they're trustworthy.
I've also seen this.

I think when a company trusts its employees to get the job done, a few really good things happen. High performers (where "performance" is directly tied to revenue, or goal completion, or actual metrics and not "ass-in-chair" fluff) produce quality work quickly. Middle performers do fine. Terrible performers, if you have any, stick out - instead of having a hard conversation with them about how many hours they put in, you can have a hard conversation with them about how they need to improve.

What I think is fascinating is how frequently, when working in an environment that gives someone room to be creative, or less stressed, or even given more responsibilities, middle performers often become high level performers. I'm sure there are lots of reasons as to why, but I've seen it happen a lot. I suspect that when you trust someone to do what they're good at, they have room to get even better at it. At least that's been my experience.

I have also seen insanely pedantic levels of tracking and reporting and dogma at companies, and those are miserable places. High performers leave. Everyone else spends their time figuring out how to juice their numbers and play within the system so they look like high performers. Tracking everything builds a new, unspoken system that, when you're in it, becomes your first concern above all else, and even pits you against your coworkers.
For anyone who has ever had the laptop out in the garage next to the CNC machine, yeah, no, those things are extremely onerous.

You're in the machine shop outside of town and you literally have everything you need locally to make the computer drive the 4000lb hunk of cast iron around to cut the hunk of metal into the shape and then when you open your laptop Fusion 360 randomly decides you're not logged in and you need to 2FA to get to your own damn data that's local to your box—except there is no cell service here.

Fuck. B-double-e-double-r-U-N beer run! Bring the laptop into town and make a hotspot at the gas station so you can get back into your damn cloud account and then drive back to the shop in the hills and finally send G-code to the mill. Using data and software you had on your laptop the whole damn time.

Looks like that cut isn't finishing up until 3am.

The point is, you're doing an activity that doesn't require the internet. When an application that provides functionality that doesn't require internet connectivity introduces a hard dependency on the internet, it's user-hating design, plain and simple.
It’s illegal so that individual employee will be brought before the courts. If the employee was justified, the jury will nullify their conviction.
That feels like something that removes part of the fun challenge IMO (placement and routing is a big deal in factorio)
There is no evidence that the spec of the bike factored into, though?

And if they just wanted to send a message to the bike company, why sue the other girl?

Really, that last point really hits me poorly.
Oh!! Thank you!! These are the answers I am looking for because these never crossed my thoughts. These are boring and no one likes them! Exactly my taste.
Amprius Building Gigawatt-Scale High-Capacity Li-Ion Factory
I think the learning curve is one of the biggest challenges. Functional programming is very different for someone who got started with JS/Python/PHP/Java/C#/Ruby/etc. and you have to re-think how you do things.

And when you get a bit further in, since there’s no classes and inheritance in Elixir, you have to get into macros or other really complicated patterns if you want to avoid code duplication.

So while I love the language, it is a challenge that I you can’t use the patterns you’re used to from other languages, but have to learn new (arguably better) ways to do things. And not everyone wants to be challenged this way.
I think the difference is that Mauna Kea is uniquely suited for an observatory and happens to also be sacred. I’m not surprised a place with such clear views of the stars is sacred. Mt. Rushmore is different. There’s nothing that makes the Black Hills uniquely suited for a tacky sculpture. It was constructed out of spite and the site was chosen to prove a point.
Your exhaustion with the word mirrors my exhaustion with the practice, but ending use of the word will not quash the creeping shit
If you watch many bike shows on youtube, you'll see that a lot of storebought bikes have woefully lacking brakes and usually need proper adjustment frequently to keep them working as good as they possibly can. And even well designed bikes can have failures when used outside of their expected scenarios (broken seatposts, handlebars). Most bike owners don't even think about bike maintenance unless something obvious is broken.

Heck, car parking brakes can fail on hills, so drivers need to know to turn their front wheels the right way to help prevent a runaway car. Many car parking brakes aren't designed for steep hills. Is the car maker at fault if the parking brake fails in an abnormal environment?

Some bikes with caliper brakes can have tire failures due to rim heating from long downhill braking. And a blown front tire could lead to a bad crash. Are the bike makers, wheel makers, brake makers, and tire makers at fault here too? Or perhaps California should be sued for making a road that's too steep?

As for rich people not suing because they need more money... these people sued their daughter's friend's family. How is that going to help? All that will do is add salt to the wound the living child probably has. In fact, it's just evil to do that to the other kid.
When did you make a deal with Microsoft not to modify your start menu and how can I get in on that?
It's fascinating to read your descriptions of economic realities then describe taxes as a way to get through these problems but only if you can have additional profit seeking and added layers of bureaucracy.
Gas taxes pay for less than half of what's required for road maintenance[0].

Again, we don't expect roads to make a profit, but somehow mass transit has to play by other rules.

Cars are far, far more subsidized than public transit[1]. (Even these analyses tend to ignore externalities like "free" parking. In what other realm would you ever expect to permanently store your private property on public land without paying and have it protected by the police?)

Driving is so incredibly heavily subsidized in the US that people genuinely _believe_ things like paying a miniscule tax at the pump covers the actual cost of driving.

[0]: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-13/debunking...

[1]: https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2020/8/17/in-transportat...
Many cartoons for kids don't use language much. Eg have a look at Tom and Jerry. But the same applies to much modern fare, too.
I supposed anyone clicked on this got hacked.
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/adverse-inferences
All of the small wind turbines I have seen have been mounted on a tower, which creates its own set of headaches.

But yes the tower is a must usually.
They already are!

The bar to clear isn't perfect drivers, 'just' clearly and demonstrably safer than human drivers.
The context here is that I may want to run an Elixir script from a Bash command line which results in some environment variables being changed. I don't think that's possible unless that script itself sends that env command to STDOUT, and I then capture it and eval it on the Bash side. Which seems... inelegant.
"I see a lot of confusion here, probably Clouflare should have included an explanation of how ECH works in TFA instead of referring to their other article[1]."

Even better would be to explain why SNI exists. This in turn explains why CDNs like Cloudflare are interested in it. SNI allows CDNs to operate as intermediaries on a www where HTTPS is increasinglty mandatory for every website. With respect to the "privacy" of TLS it is peculiar to put ISPs and governments in one category and CDNs in another. If ISPs (without ECH) or CDNs (with or without ECH) are getting a list of every domain the user visits, then governments can get the same list by requesting it from the ISP or CDN.

The question, IMHO, is whether there are other possible technical solutions besides TLS SNI to allow multiple HTTPS sites to be hosted on the same IP. Is it possible to obviate the need to use a third party such as a CDN to solve this problem. Is it possible to obviate the need for duct tape solutions like ECH. ECH is proposed as a solution for the "plaintext domain names over the wire" problem. But that problem only exists because it's created by the use of SNI. And SNI exists to enable one to host multiple HTTPS sites on the same IP. Today, CDNs are the primary benefactors of SNI. They host 10s or 100s of 1000s of HTTPS sites on a limited number of IPs. These are the primary users and benefactors of SNI.

For example, consider this prototype, which some believe inspired the advertising company-sposonsored "QUIC":

https://curvecp.org/addressing.html

"An ISP or site administrator can easily run a huge number of CurveCP servers on a single global IPv4 address, even if the servers are independently operated with separate long-term public keys. This feature is provided by a simple extension mechanism in CurveCP addresses.

CurveCP servers are inherently anti-aliased, providing automatic virtual hosting and fixing some of the deficiencies in the "same-origin" policy in web browsers. This feature is provided by a simple domain-name mechanism in CurveCP addresses.
If a site has two server addresses, and one server is down, a CurveCP client will quickly connect to the other address.

A CurveCP connection remains fully functional even if the client changes IP address.

CurveCP is fully compatible with existing NAT (network address translation) mechanisms; none of the above features require clients or servers to know the global addresses of their gateways."
What's the point of being ham nerds if no one cares what really happened here?

1.65m is FM (90 MHz) which as told is wrong. Can't pick up FM like this, it is NOT simple like all the AM stories.

Chrome books don't have inbuilt radio as far as I can see (Why not is a good question for another time. After the phone cartels destroyed radio on phones why doesn't Google put it in Chromebooks? Would it create awkward questions for their phone cartel department.)

They say coiling it doesn't change it -

The geometry of the cable does change the sound a little. I can't remember much, but I got the impression it got a little louder when I stretched it, although I could also hear it fine when wrapping it around in circles. Changing the geometry of the wire definetly changes the audio, even if by little

They are in Brazil... not sure if that matters. ( Definitely FM -https://www.wikiwand.com/en/FM_extended_band_in_Brazil)

They didn't hear the FM radio logo, it's a friend who did, so that's not a trustworthy data point. OPs account seems legit, so you could probably trust their personal experiences.

It's probably either a AM re-transmission of FM or an AM station. The cord is not acting as an exact antenna.
Who do you think is truly at the top of these efforts? Like, what is the motivation? How is there not more money to be made on a purely quantitative basis from regular clearnet dwellers?
Really? I rather like the German industrial techno they play while you're in it.
I'd argue that gridlock is a feature not a bug. Hamilton even said as much in the Federalist papers when acknowledging that the model of a three-branch government can be slow and inefficient compared to a one or two branch model.

I think this gets a bit further down the road than my original goal of a quick solution that could be implemented now for some benefit, but yeah I'd love to see power pushed as far down the hierarchy as possible.
It might be possible to create gravitational waves in a lab
Not to mention that it runs on a pile of different platforms. It gets used a lot in Sony Vita homebrew stuff, for example.
Are there examples of such warrants being issued? This was, more or less, the subject of the big showdown between Apple and the FBI some years ago. The FBI maybe could have won legally but decided to back down. If such warrants were being issued, they eventually would be made public in the resulting criminal prosecutions.
That's exactly why I've been keeping all "duplicates" in my photo collections.

They do take up a lot of space, and just today I asked in photo.stackexchange for backup compression techniques that can exploit inter-image similarities: https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/132609/backup-comp...
You can make that claim about any software. Why would you assume their installers can't be verified publicly? Are they using unsigned installers? Perhaps your OS also is pushing signed updates with an implant based on your IP, much more convenient than fighting with vpn providers for just traffic.

The only claim they made is about the vpn service itself. If FISA orders it, the NSA will break into your house and plant cameras to watch your monitor lol. That's a strawman argument. You shouldn't argue against an claim they didn't make about update security, but even then can't you just use your own wireguard client? You don't have to use theirs right?
If autonomous vehicles start driving like humans, it's going to reveal the contradictions of US traffic laws. Traffic only works because humans break traffic laws all the time (e.g. speeding). Autonomous driving will either need to be programmed to break many traffic laws, or it's going to cause problems and block traffic. I honestly don't see how this is going to get resolved. The sensible thing would be to change traffic laws so they can be strictly enforced, like raising the speed limit to 85 on 280, but I don't see that happening.
That's strange, because from what I've read, "cybernetics" as a scientific discipline was much more influential in the USSR than it ever was in western countries. The term is now almost exclusively associated with (digital) computers, but originally it was more about feedback loops in analog systems, and its theories were applied to centralised economic planning. But maybe it wasn't taken seriously by the leadership, is that what you mean?
May be uncommon, but so are deaths from bicycle falls. Doesn't make them not exist. I know we would file friends on bikes going down hills from time to time. Usually stopped when we got hurt.
I seem to be hearing about these torrential rain/flood in the news more often and this data visualization that I made a couple of years ago seems relevant.

https://twitter.com/oikoweather/status/1338691244470403075

Basically, since 1950, we've added 2 litres of water per square meter of earth's surface to the atmosphere. This is twice the volume of Lake Erie.
Hell? Or heaven?
Thank you for the clarification follow-up.
I think that's a bit off base here. It's like asking how does a keyboard user facilitate click-and-hold to pan the canvas in a drawing program? They don't. Panning with the mouse (or dragging objects) is one interface. The task is panning the canvas, the means to achieve that are varied.

In my example, the answer to the question about accessibility is to additionally provide keyboard controls to complete the task (preferably ones that don't - or optionally don't - require holding a key). For example perhaps a key shortcut to enter a pan mode, in which the arrow keys move the viewport around the canvas. Problem solved.

As for draggable objects, the task is re-ordering. How do you make that accessible? Provide an alternative means to re-order objects, perhaps using TAB to cycle focus through the objects, then a key to select the focused one, and use the arrow keys to move the drag preview to the nearest valid position in that direction.
> Mauna Kea is sacred to the world’s scientists too

This is ugly phrasing given the history. I don’t think scientists use words like “sacred” to describe objective qualities. Its a false equivalence that undermines the real cultural damage.
We will almost certainly block ECH at my work, as we already block DoH. I expect any sane network to do the same.

The natural alternative if blocking these protocols becomes unsustainable will absolutely be to require full decryption at our security edge. And that will provide drastically more information to us than we have now and will absolutely feel invasive.

The idea of uninspectable client traffic is somewhat unhinged, and is already heavily used by malicious actors.
Nova documentaries:

* The First Alphabet

* How Writing Changed the World
Neat concept! *'ed
I have over 7000. I await this... fresh meat.
Integrating Slonik with Express.js
Scientific data shows a trend and this is not the stock market where you can expect anything random. What is dogmatic? Our ignorance in dogmatics? Truth is objective and doesn't give a damn if it's dogmatic or not, every action has a reaction.
So the same as protons Secure core.
Same here. 15 pro max and all is smooth sailing. Worst I had it was tethered to a laptop running zoom and a pc running another zoom with the phone charging. It had to stop charging at 80% for thermal protection.

When the biggest complaints about a device are like this I feel good about the purchase.