skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'll wait for public release before I log in and engage with Bing. The way Microsoft has been inching their way into my computers and accounts, I want to disconnect from their rampant invasiveness at any-cost.
Definitely. Javascript is absolutely the modern analogue of '80s BASIC. Comes built-in to the computer/browser with no need to install anything, interpreted language with no need for any kind of toolchain, emphasizes ease of use (even when that comes at a detriment to things that language purists like -- e.g., strong typing), has metric tons of example code to do all kinds of cool things...
You don’t need parking if you live in a city with nice transit

Low density means you are unlikely to live a walkable distance from a friend, so suburbia sucks for that too

Honestly the only thing you said that is true is the big yard, everything else is worse in suburbia than cities

Maybe not American cities, but most suck anyway
OpenDKIM allows you to setup signing tables which can include individual keys for individual sending addresses.

So you're kinda right in the sense it's mostly authenticating the sending service's configuration and relationship to the domain, but kind of wrong on the front where the part before the @ isn't fundamentally authenticated. It is.

The User/User-Agent decoupling issue is still omnipresent, and adds a fundamental layer of uncertainty, that you are correct in. The fact we still seemingly need to grind that in to the uninitiated at times feels like there needs to be a cure to magical thinking formulated more than anything else.
No.

Hardware people are fully aware of their shortcomings, but they also are fully aware that software is even worse.

Far far worse.
I was responding to the poster who claimed that this is an "extra-judicial punishment" after the person has "paid the standard debt to society". If someone was convicted in a court of law, the information isn't inaccurate.

Addressing your point, if the newspaper article is inaccurate, why not have the article removed or corrected? Instead, it is the opposite. The man says the articles can stay up. Canadian defamation law is pretty clear. If the article is false, he can sue to have it removed. I'm tending to believe delisting from Google is the man's plan because he can't get the articles removed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_defamation_law

FTA: "The man said outdated and inaccurate information about him in newspaper articles found on the internet was leading to great personal harm, including physical assault, employment discrimination, severe social stigma and persistent fear." and "He wanted the information to be delisted – made unsearchable, unless someone knew the website urls featuring his name."
Most of the homeless in my city migrated here from outside of the city (and often State) to come here for our weather, services, and lax attitude towards drug use as far as demographics go. We're a navy town so there's also a tragic sub-group of veterans with mental health issues but the bulk of our homeless (we actually use the term "transient" as side context) don't fall into this category and mainly came here for the conveniences. I'm sure there are some who are trying to "dig out" as you say but it's certainly not most of them and for the ones who aren't trying to do so a bike with charging capabilities would be both a mobility boost (again assuming theft wasn't a concern) and a general utility boost (smartphones are largely ubiquitous amongst our homeless and are actually extremely valuable as tools since they're both navigation aids and access points for online services offered to them in my city). This is why I was asking what the demographics of the homeless in London are like since if they resemble our population then the bike wouldn't be such a terrible idea (but I'm also still unsure about the practicality since while some of our homeless ride bikes most get around via public transit and so just putting chargers on busses would probably be more pragmatic as a service to them).
"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;"

Henry V (1599), W.Shakespeare

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Crispin%27s_Day_Speech

'Few' here means 'several' thousand soldiers (~7,000) at the Battle of Agincourt (1415). In the speech, it is explained that few is in comparison to the whole (adult male) population of England (up to 1m).

"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few."

House of Commons (1940), W.Churchill

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_was_so_much_owed_by_so...

In a deliberate echo of Shakespeare, Churchill also compares the relatively small number of RAF fighter pilots (~3,000) to the many, the population of Britain, it's Empire, the free world, and perhaps all free peoples into our uncertain future.
This reminds me of a time when I was meditating in my dimly lit office after work some years ago. For context, I had been meditating daily for 20-30 minutes quite consistently at the time.

During this session, about 15 minutes in I had the sensation of "seeing with my eyes closed". I could see very clearly my workspace, desk, monitors, keyboard, etc. It was one of the most remarkable experiences of my life.

I am wondering now if this was related to a sudden lapse in aphantasia (which it seems like I have), a closed eye hallucination (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed-eye_hallucination), both, or something else?
“few” and “a few” are different
"Americans are not building high speed rails, not because it doesn't bring in the so called value, it is because such investment would threat the interests of those airliners. How much the US invested in high speed rail in the last 20 years compared to its total $ spent on wars?"

America is pretty bad at building other infrastructure, too.

NY subway does not threaten interests of airlines, but its expansion is notoriously slow and expensive.
I don't think anyone's queuing up for shows, but it doesn't hold the same cultural history, so the sensitivity and care is much less. Blackface as a subject (e.g the episode of Scrubs where it's just a funny bit) doesn't spark any debate, removal or cancellation. It's seen in context.
I've met several PhDs in "data scientist" positions that write complete garbage code. Simply having a PhD (or any other degree) doesn't mean you'll be a good engineer.
More concrete yes, but losing Pascal's Wager means hell. I'm pretty happy with the childfree lifestyle, but it's hard to argue there's any chance that I'm evading a fate worse than hell.
If they can't pay it back, that seems like an awful deal for MS, and a great deal for OpenAI.
TL;DR theory of operation

> Talbot's product takes advantage of the fact that, without having to pay to take out one of these bikes, their chain will still move when pedalling backwards. This can power up the tiny pedal-powered generator contained in the portable charger.

The electricity generated in the process is then stored in MyPowerbank's internal batteries, with around 25 minutes of pedalling equating to one full phone charge.
I did indeed bring that up in another comment. I don't feel the need to repeat all information across all of my comments.

I don't know what your point is.
I’d argue that there really isn’t a single American English just as there isn’t a single British English.
Weekend bricolage: a lightbox for photographing electronics for under €15
>>Parents as the driving force simply won’t work.

I keep seeing that myth. Most of the people I know studies the same as their parents, inspired by them. Specially what catches in kids are hobbies.
I have lots of friend which are professional or semi professional musicians. All of them got the playing of the instrument from the parents.
I don’t know but I do know the answer for California. The answer is: as distributed solar and battery power proliferate, normalizing the price of electricity per kWh makes less and less sense because increasingly what you are paying for is not energy but intangible grid stability. Until finally you’re not drawing any current from the grid and your utility charge is infinity per kWh.
Some of us pay for YouTube Premium.

One can argue that if you don't want ads, and you don't want to pay for a subscription, then maybe you shouldn't use that website.

Because continued use is just like software piracy. It's imoral because you're getting subsidized by those playing fair, but also because alternatives can't thrive unless you choose to vote with your wallet or eyeballs. It's the same reason piracy was imoral, as it kept people using the incumbents, instead of using alternatives that were open-source.
Blockchains are designed to avoid double spending in a low trust environment.

Double spending isn't one of the problems in AI. This article is absolute nonsense

> a cryptographically secure, decentralized ledger is the only solution to making AI safer
How do "they" affect you, poor soul?
Niklas-Luhmann-Archiv
There is no a modern day equivalent. Not because of availibility of hardware or software (both better hardware and better software are widely available at trivial costs nowadays), but because the world around us has changed. Specifically, the experience needs to compete against the limitless other distractions from the internet.

Here's a simple simulation of the 1980s experience: https://virtualconsoles.com/online-emulators/c64/
If your kid is like most kids, they might spend 20s on this before they get back to their Youtube/TikTok/Instagram/Roblox fix. Or maybe a few hours at best if there's a very enthusiastic adult sitting next to them explaining everything. But they'll probably be back at their regular internet distraction as soon as the adult is gone.

For a decent recreation of the 1980s experience, you'd need to shut the kids off from the internet for some extended period. But even that is only an approximation, if they have any contact with other kids.
I think this has to do with the verb "draw". LLM is just saying it cannot draw. The image generation is likely a function it "calls". The LLM probably thinks of the image generator as a tool it uses, a separate entity from itself.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05647 ("Detection of a γ-ray halo around Geminga with the Fermi-LAT and implications for the positron flux")

( aka. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123015 )
Renewable deployment in 2023 is already 25x higher than the peak year of fission deployment.
I think, having an easy to reach voice recorder is better than stressing and writing about what you saw.
Self-hosting anything and everything (on one's LAN) is a domain with lots of "Wild West" still in it.

No two people will set it up quite the same.
Delphi is still around as well,

https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi
Kano - https://kano.tech/us/original

Looks like their website has changed around. They used to have a kit that came with a raspberry pi (that you had to assemble yourself) and their own Linux-based OS that taught you about computers and the command line

https://github.com/KanoComputing/kano-desktop
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/kano-computer-kit-touch...
This has the same appeal as your email account's spam folder but if it can expedite the death of social media I'm all for it.
Taxes are hands down the best way to handle this “as long as there’s demand someone will produce supply” tragedy of the commons. Taxes can be progressively introduced and are completely compatible with our existing legislative, legal, accounting frameworks. They also scale naturally with usage, impacting large users disproportionately with smaller users. It will also disproportionately increase prices for carbon-intensive products and services. Proceeds can be applied towards climate mitigation solutions and climate tech research.

This will not solve all problems. But it would be unreasonable to suggest that some incremental tax would not have beneficial effects. Tax oil at the source. Right now oil is one of the most profitable industries in the world. That is not a tenable or stable position.
From my understanding, he didn’t know the letter would be made public. Which I find to be even more insidious.
You're right. I hadn't really thought about it that way. My response at the time actually came from confusion on my part (that is my own fault I suppose). I got woken up at 4am on a Sunday by a flood of calls saying there is a post on the top of HN about DO leaking data between VMs. I got out of bed to see if I needed to wake up the engineering team, checked the support system and the disclosure emails because my first thought was shit someone has pwned the LXC/escaped the jails or something. Then when I read the github, I thought the scrub flag wasn't being respected when it was passed. That was the type of security issue I had originally taken it to mean, both I would have woken up engineering for. It was a someone is in the hypervisor type of security issue I thought we were dealing with. Once I realized it was fog didn't pass the scrub flag, I wish I'd just gone back to bed and dealt with it on Monday instead of trying to do it in real time, that was stupid of me. I also accept your point that an unexpected behaviour can in itself be a security issue.
And real poor people, not middle class westerners complaining about housing and student loans.

Poor people in Asia and Africa still have large families.
Whilst I understand the nostalgia, I think it's easy to forget that these things were modern and exciting - not so much today. I suggest you take what is here today and use it.

If it were me (and it may soon be) I would get them to make a static (ie with no backend processing) web page. It is easy and can be free to publish it. The basic page can then be enhanced with interaction using scripting almost without limits.

The child can show it off to anyone with a screen. You can control the publishing since it can be built offline.

And before you say JavaScript is terrible, so is Basic!

This is the modern equivalent to what you remember.
This is entirely divorced from reality, then. You'd have to make the code resilient to failure modes specific to operating environments you're entirely unaware of while authoring the code. E.g. someone takes your code and cross-compiles it for use as part of one of several daemons running in an embedded system on an architecture you never tested on, and it leaks memory in that environment due to how to OS allocates memory there. I'm not thrilled with this example I just made up, but I hope it captures the distinction between writing an algorithm and deploying a full solution into a known environment.

The idea that software engineers can 'guarantee' against this is fantasy and precisely what integration testing is for. It has to be the case that those who deploy the code take responsibility for its behavior, not the original authors, since only those deploying have the full picture of the system.
I suspect that most remaining FF users are running it on Linux desktop.
Getting JTAG on the iPhone 15 [video]
If this is not well researched or if it’s improperly done it can be really dangerous. If people start believing their loved ones are in there when doctors can’t really save them this could add a lot of suffering and cost to the healthcare system. Can anyone here tell?
We can take this further. Corporations usually pay for prime shelf space in retail. That's technically an ad.
> They are unselfish entities designed to serve society, why would we tax them?????? It's f*** crazy.

This is about the most outlandish claim I've ever seen made in defense of big tech. They literally are not charitable organizations. They serve the selfish desires of their respective CEOs, boards, and shareholders. Second tier consideration to advertisers, then employees and users in distant third. "Society" doesn't factor in, until they arrive at the gates with pitchforks.
Agree a little bit. But also, it seems like there are many powerful people in San Francisco, people like Nancy Palosi, and they don’t want, the city from becoming Mumbai or Hong Kong or whatever it is you think it should be. You seem to want to limit wealthy people like her from participating in the political in a way that protects their interests. Even if you can somehow prevent individuals from impacting politics, groups like the California Coastal Commission will still pop up to represent nearly identical interests to those of individual landowners. The environment matters to poor folks too.
Fact Checkers Take Stock of Their Efforts: ‘It’s Not Getting Better’
I'm kind of hoping that they adjust it to ask for clarification or find some sort of soft adjustment to make them less problematic rather than just trying to do blind keyword blocking.

Of course, I'd love for them to take the approach as well that folks are just going to do what they do, and maybe they'll burn out the novelty and give it a rest.
I think it’s mixed. Their blog has a little data tool.

Note that their chart doesn’t seem to show most game types.I presume this is because they do much worse. If I do a quick check for games since 2022, games with sexual content made a median of $1.6k whereas non sex games made $296.

If we use their advice to only check games that cost at least $10: sex games make $17k and non sex games make $11k. So maybe not so bad. Most of these games are selling about a thousand copies it seems.

Of the games released since 2022 that made at least 10k (4260 games) only A third were sex and dating sim games
Yes, but it’s equivalent to going to taco bell and deciding based on that that America has terrible Mexican food.
"You should be rotating the key regularly and automatically, and publishing old private keys."

OK, I read the article, I operate my own email server and nothing I read convinces me I should do what they're suggesting.
Yes, basically the incentive wasn't there for China to make the pen ball, not that it was impossible. The same dynamic is in play with bringing back manufacturing to the US. China is the manufacturing center of the world because it's more cost effective to do so there than in other parts of the world, including setting up supply chains. If that incentive is diminished or gone then other places will emerge. It took 20 years for China to get there basically from scratch. It will take much less to rebuild the capabilities in previous manufacturing hubs.
Convention and culture. Hence - I wish that I could.
I don't speak French, but it seems a lot more likely that "en huit" would translate as "in 8 (days)" rather than "in height (days)". Are you a native speaker and know better, or might this be a mistake?
YAML is like Regex in the "Now you have two problems" philosophy.

It's like using an XML file for what a txt file could do.

It demands frankly unnecessary structure and formatting just to be ingested, when it's all serially-read parameters, anyway.

YAML isn't the only way to implement parameterization. We could use our imaginations and think of a ton of tried-and-true ways to abstract it.

Have you ever done a quick-deploy on a cloud platform? The alternatives just generate all the esoteric stuff for you. Config files generated by guided steps.
So, some math:

$362K invested in 2003 would now be $1.25M, so this landlord would have been a lot better putting the money into an index fund. When you consider the amount of real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance, which probably today runs at about $35K a year, if you account for a measly 1% per year for maintenance, this was not a good investment, though some of the relative loss is made up in the form of tax breaks.

If the landlord did not buy this place, that would leave you or anyone else unable to live in this place unless you purchased it yourself and then became a landlord to others, essentially at a loss relative to putting your money in an index fund.

$100K a year rent for this place barely covers the interest you would earn on $1.3M, plus taxes, maintenance and insurance, so there is no positive cash flow here.

The solution is to pay the landord what it actually costs to properly maintain the units, which means raising your rent.

Yes, no one wants to pay people what they "should" be payed, just like no one wants to pay rent in the amount that needs to be paid to allow the place to be maintained properly.

At some point, a balance is found, and things are given up to achieve that balance.
If you're at the point of dying, probably not much you can do to pass on your genes.
It's also how Saul Goodman works
Most people are posting links to hardware, but in my mind, this is a software question. Maybe one of those BASIC interpreters with an integrated IDE, the way that QBASIC used to be on older Windows versions?

QB64 is the modern equivalent: https://qb64.com/

Your kids won't literally need to navigate the command line to launch the games. But I think that editing config files to "hack" the game is still on the table :-)

EDIT: also https://www.endbasic.dev/, which jmmv posted below.
I guess that depends on that womans interests. Many women (and men, but less) are simply not career driven. Many stay at home parents build wonderful social lives around other parents at playgroups, schools etc and see their friends more than their working comparatives. Your health is also in theory a lot easier to stay on top of without a job - not so much with small children, but definitely with double digits.
Do you want Terminator? Because this is how you get Terminator. A blockchain-based distributed giant AI could go rogue and it would be very difficult to stop it.
They seem to be pretty effective when it comes to leaving a bike in busy area in broad daylight. My anecdata is that the only time my bike was stolen was when I failed to use the D-lock right (just locked the wheel, oops) whereas the properly-locked bikes around me were all still there.

Leaving it overnight or somewhere out of the way, though... yeah, a different story. Threat model, as you described.
Unlike OpenAI's DALL-E this can't take existing images and transform them which is a bummer. You can give Bing an existing picture but it will analyze it then turn it into a string description which it then feeds into DALL-E 3. Plus it blurs faces. So it's an underpowered version of what paying ChatGPT folks will get.

And as usual, Bing Chat itself seems to suffer from some significantly higher boundaries around its behavior, which really lobotomizes the chat experience compared to "actual" ChatGPT.
The article and its title are a little bit deceptive.
They tried to give the impression that wine bars are like in an unjustified and incorrect category by comparing to "strip clubs".

But lost in the article is the real reason:
They also illustrate challenges that are specific to the Mission District, born of legislation that was meant to fight gentrification. In 2018, the city capped the number of bars and restaurants that can operate in the neighborhood at 167.

So the rule goals are there to fight gentrification, and not a log of things are as hipster as a "wine bar" in my opinion.
As I learned from my mom, "maybe, I'll think about it".
A pi by itself, eh I don't know.

A pi + a full kit like breadboard/cables, LCD/LED display panels, camera, microphone/speaker, air sensors, IR sensors, gyros, etc. Now that's got a chance.

It's certainly not going to be for all kids but for those with an inquisitive mind once you set them up and show how to display output in various ways they will start to see the potential. From there you can move onto basic rc hobbyist stuff which is more accessible than ever. Buy some cheap brushless motors, wheels and a frame online, make the pi follow you around by sound only.
I think the "competition" is much harder nowadays. When you have all the AAA games available, it's not that exciting to just get something moving on the screen.

Maybe something physical would be interesting? Like programming a led-strip (nowadays you have these where you can individually address the lights), robotic arm or something like that.

If kids are into certain games, maybe there's some opportunities to explore on the modding side. Like for the Euro Truck simulator you can bring your own graphics for the trucks. No idea how complicated it is to package those, but it would probably teach a ton of things.