skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They wouldn't.

This would be more like "your own device won't let you do x" because it has detected x, and software is designed to prevent x.

There's a few problems though:

If software including such 'feature' were open source, wouldn't you simply remove that feature? I know I would.

If closed source, which party would be trusted to develop that 'feature'? App developer? OS vendor? Government? Network provider? Note there's good & bad ones among each of those.

So how would you know it doesn't phone home? You wouldn't.

And thus... back to square 1.

Which (imho) makes that E2EE and "think of the children" are mutually exclusive. Either messages are truly private (and bad things may happen), or they're not (and bad things may happen anyway, or even worse things when citizen-hostile governments get involved).
This guy is Russian. Furthermore he has chosen to align himself with the aggressor.
I'm with you on this one (except for the price point, price seems fine?). Lego lasts, it's not like single use plastic packaging and bottles. Exceptions can be made for plastics that have a far longer useable lifetime.
It did, but I was speaking to the point of there being wastage.
I think we also have to force chargers to accept simple means of payment like a credit card. Imagine how ridiculous it would be it we had to create an account for every single gas station network. This would also take care of when you are outside of cell coverage. Yes there are aggregator that works on multiple networks but you still have to track what is in/out network and in case of emergency. The current state of the charging infra is really not up to the task.
Another arbitrary set of tips for the perfect resume. It provides zero evidence that this selection process results in better candidates. None of the perfect resume guides does that. What they do instead is list a bunch of personal preferences and try to justify them because they are blinded by their position. Did you really make a better job than randomly eliminating 90% of the applications? Who knows.
> there's no way to be sure that every second of GPS-tagged video shot by a DJI drone isn't going into a giant server farm owned by the Chinese intelligence service.

-GP

> The point GP is making is that DJI does not indiscriminately upload every video.

-You

That seems to be exactly what GP is claiming could be happening.

They were concerned about “every second of video” which would fit the definition of “indescribably”.
It's plenty solid, and there's a good library of packages on there. It's a package manager, doesn't take more than that.
It's nice that you can get things. But there's a cost - increasingly large numbers of people can't.

I'm sure as the game continues you won't become one of them.

IMO the real problem is that maybe 5% of the population are amoral sociopaths, and being absolutely heartless and uncaring - often with a liking for outright abuse and violence - gives them a competitive edge in almost any political and social system you can imagine.

Normal people just can't imagine that another human might operate like this.

But worse - many people seem to have some kind of bizarre deferential herd instinct to follow these crazies off the suicide cliff.

It may not be a fixable problem. We're a flawed species. Perhaps it won't be long before evolution - the ultimate owner of the casino - shrugs and moves on.
Honestly if I was as large as DJI I would avoid publishing in the play (and Apple app if it were possible) store as well and save the wasted time of the constant pointless review rejections.
just the No string is that it? Other than that I've never encoutered any other problem.

> 2-3 levels deep.

Same to python, all non-trivial code is like 4 level+ depth, big deal!

I normally write javascript and I switch to python easily from time to time. I cannot understand people who complain about spaces.
I'm sorry, a 10-stage application with at least 5 different interviews? How many weeks is this going to take? This feels like FAANG-level recruitment.

Am I so out of touch to expect an application, one interview and maybe a technical assessment for most IT/CompSci jobs? Wouldn't the probationary period be way more effective to see if you fit into the team/company/culture/etc.?
>Doom, at the time, had great art. It hasn’t aged well.

Huh? I find it has aged just fine, aesthetics wise.

Or do you mean the lower res of the original?
At a quick glance that looks like it will rasterize the vectors, which is usually not what you want to do with an EPS.
Thanks for pointing to the video; I didn't know it and just had a look at some parts; there is even a HN discussion about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37629753. Unfortunately I couldn't find any information yet about the video author's background; he usually seems to publish videos about games, so he is likely not a specialist for most of the topics presented in the video (please post a reference if my conclusion doesn't apply), and the conclusions presented seem rather arbitrary and tendentious. But he brings up a lot of interesting points which are worth a closer look.

There is a very long debate in the sciences about what intelligence and creativity is. The questions will probably only be answered conclusively - if at all - when we know exactly how the brain and consciousness work in detail; this will still take some time.

Nevertheless, scientists who specialize in the subject already have well-founded expert opinions. In terms of creativity, there are established tests, and apparently ChatGPT performs very well here; see e.g. https://neurosciencenews.com/ai-creativity-23585/.

I do not find the point that models merely "interpolate between points included in its training set" (in many dimensions, or even non-linear, depending on the network architecture) troubling, since essentially human creativity, as we understand it today, is also a combination and "interpolation" of what we have learned and experienced. The conclusion that "mixing what has already been done" is "unable to create anything original" is wrong and contradicts experience. Just take a look at the patent database to see how many inventions there are that merely re-arrange or combine something existing in a slightly different way. A somewhat prominent theory of how inventions are accomplished is e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIZ or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_inventive_thinking.
That looks like the same engine Warhammer: Dark Omen used. I played that quite a lot.

But I guess I never developed the nostalgia for the technical limitations of the time. Even back in those days I clearly saw them as a limitation to be tolerated. The sprites meant that I couldn't correctly perceive the rotation of the units, since there were so few angles available. This meant sometimes I couldn't tell if the game was buggy and my units were looking the wrong way, or the sprite system just wasn't able to display their true state. The sprites were a means to the end of rendering units with more detail than 3D tech of the time allowed, not something that in itself was appealing.

I think what would be more interesting is not to imitate the exact state of technology in the 90s, but try leaning into the same approach with modern tech. Render the hell out of those sprites at ultra high res and levels of detail, and try to make a sprite game that uses sprites because even a GTX 4090 couldn't render that in real time.

Though at this point in time it might already be too late for this to make sense, since the amount of detail a modern video card can produce is insane.
A common phenomenon in the age of ChatGPT. Making the mistake of thinking you can spot AI writing because you can spot bad AI writing. You're only spotting the bad. The good you think is real. Some of the best cover letters and answers the author reads were probably written with the assistance of AI.

The key to using AI to write better is: 'with the assistance of'. You don't write a prompt, get a bunch of text and copy paste it. Instead, you use AI to help you, as basically a spellchecker on steroids that can accept commands to do anything.

One example is where the author mentions non-native English speakers. They can use AI to turn their broken English into exactly what they said but with perfect grammar, formatting, spelling and punctuation - and sprinkle in some thesaurus help and rewording here and there. They can even get some ideas for making the tone witty or serious or professional or funny. Key there is 'ideas'. Don't copy paste, use it to help.
> Wouldn't a Linux device, or Linux running on a Mac suit you better?

No? Maybe you're preferring Mac OS for getting stuff done, exchange work with the outside world and/or use non-historic software (like any commercial desktop app such as idk Photoshop, Sketch, Audio, 3D, CAD s/w, etc., etc.) and still are a developer?

Or even doing something esoteric such as using office software without wanting to throw your notebook out of the window?
It’s way easier in declarative frameworks, though.
WSL1 didn't run Linux kernel anywhere.
If Google had any faith in their product lines, that email would have a big call to action making it easy for a subscriber to switch plans. It’s weird that they just don’t seem to care at all about dropping subscribers, like they expect to fail and expect to be unable to upsell.
Or intimate drawings of him with Cleopatra?

Is that so terrible? Seems totally benign?
I see the reverse “lie that contains some truth” in your argument. Obviously this stuff will be used for all of these purposes as soon as it’s able, and probably a little bit before then.
Injury != illness

But if you have an actual brain injury you are better off if you eat that salad compared with not eating it.
The problem is that there are two types of roles you need to fill. The first type is the role where you need the best you can get, it is worth passing on good candidates to try to get the great ones.

The second type are the roles where you just need someone that passes the minimum bar, good enough will do.

Problem is, everyone thinks that their role, their company, can only operate with the first type, where really most of them are the second type.
If that’s true then you’re right but I don’t know if that’s true.
Last week Intel has confirmed that Panther Lake is the code name of their desktop CPUs that will be launched in 2025 and which will be made using the Intel 18A CMOS process.

Therefore this is no longer a speculation.

It can be assumed that these are the first CPUs that will implement the 256-bit subset of the AVX10.2 ISA, finally extending the coverage of AVX-512 to all Intel products, but with the restriction to 256-bit registers and operations.

Panther Lake will be preceded by Lunar Lake for low-power mobile devices, either in late 2024 or in early 2025.

Before that, there will be Arrow Lake S for desktops and Arrow Lake for laptops. Despite the single name, these 2 implement different instruction sets and they will be made with different manufacturing processes, Intel 20A for Arrow Lake and an undisclosed process for Arrow Lake S (which might be made at TSMC, according to rumors, because it needs bigger tiles than what would be possible in Intel 20A).

While Meteor Lake seems to be just a shrink of Raptor Lake, which will have a much better performance only due to the greater energy efficiency provided by the Intel 4 process and due to the much better GPU made at TSMC, Arrow Lake is expected to introduce a new improved CPU microarchitecture, which is supposed to compete successfully with Zen 5.
Trains have never delivered to individual retail stores, half finished housing estates or petrol stations. Perhaps reserve your sarcasm for when you aren't saying something stupid.
> I don't think OS becomes any less vulnerable than usual Linux/Windows installation.

is not a good enough argument.

For the story, SIP is Apple's "rootless". Effectively the OS runs with less privileges than root. Disabling SIP significantly increases the attack surface.

That being said, I'm grateful that someone decided to do something more native for containers in macOS.
I think people do a disservice to their cause when they make semantic arguments like this.

Isn't enough to say that AI can be used for enhanced surveillance by malicious actors? What does it mean to be a "surveillance technology"? Now you have people arguing about whether AI fits the definition of this made up term instead of talking about the potentially nefarious surveillance applications.
I see 0% CPU for control center here (13.6) so either fixed, or not always the case.
Not in "another email", but can make some sense if done via "alternative communication channel". The idea is that the attacker obtaining some access to one device (let's say computer with email account containing the message with said file) doesn't have the full set of data required to open the file given password was sent with a different channel (say, text message via phone). Not the Final Word in security, but rather yet another layer of it.
Judging by my traffic logs nobody actually looks at those anyway
Ain't never gonna happen without becoming Bitcoin, wasting tons of energy and money.. but accomplishing an approximate simulation of biology inefficiently. Because you could potentially do something doesn't mean you should. There is no reason to do it but triumphal narcissism or VCs want to burn up their own money.
I think this depends on lifestyle. I know that if there's vital information on a piece of paper I need to photograph it (or type it up) and email it to myself because the paper will be lost/destroyed before too long. I could invest in a fireproof safe but it'd be another thing to move and take up space which I don't have a huge amount of. Something emailed to multiple email providers and copies stored in Dropbox, etc is unlikely to lost.

And when you're dealing with a high quantity of information, good luck searching through thousands of sheets of paper for something.
You can do it the other way if you want, using After= or Requires.
There already are battery electric trucks capable of carrying hundreds of tonnes of rocks. Australia actually has road trains north of 200 tonnes that are battery electric. The battery weight is mostly not an issue.

Weight savings are nice of course. But so is not burning diesel by the hundreds of gallons. The trade off is between a few percent extra weight or lots of dollars spent on fuel.
How so? If it was, most novelist should be great software engineers. They are not.
There is something salient about the fact that Canonical’s culture is not one to mimic, though.

What if there is something about following this advice that unwittingly selects for candidates who will make a super long and off-putting interview loop?
So is JSON, and all mainstream config formats actually.
However, that stopped being a problem with JSON schema, which, despite the name, works on yaml too.
Meanwhile Apple is the company most actively working on better battery performance, less memory utilization (e.g. compressed memory) and other such changes...
Both my wife and I had these and, despite initial promise, they behaved horribly. One particular issue was overheating and shutting down. IIRC the boot loop issue, when it eventually struck, was worked around by a hack to disable two CPU cores.
Due to this and the poor performance of Wear OS (or was it still Android Wear at that time?) we switched to iPhones.
I note that the reason I first got a 6P was because my 6 completely died one day and a 6P was the only available insurance replacement.
Despite all this, I'm likely to by the Pixel 8 and Pixel Watch 2 to replace my iPhone 8 plus.
> Is software supposed to update without administrator supervision

yes proper CI is a thing, and containers not being updated is actually quite a bit of an issue in the current software industry

especially if combined with custom registries auto update is quite a neet thing

oh also it's a SystemD feature to let SystemD manage your containers so why are you asking if it works without SystemD?
These are the guys making the actual money. A few mil in VC is fun but will only get you so far; finding a boring, useful niche to sit in and supply a market long-term is so underrated these days.
Bangalore India

dust is everywhere ..haven't learnt to classify it into types :)
I actually just looked at their application form for a systems software developer position. They really want to know how good you were at maths and native language in high school for some reason, and not only do they ask what top percentage you were in (whatever that means, high schools in my country don't do that), but they also ask you to directly point to evidence for these scores.

Right before the application form they say "We are proud to foster a workplace free from discrimination." Not everybody had the luck to be able to perform at their best in high school, so that looks like a pretty big discriminant right away! And for most people applying to that kind of job that was more than 10 years ago, so I fail to see how it is relevant to a job application.
I am referring to her other book, The Joy of Abstraction.
Yes, Linux wrapped into countless unnecessary abstraction layers.
This article is so shit. I recently been on the lookout for a new job and my first CV was personal. Full of my own words and description of what I did in the last 10+ years as a software engineer. I'm a bit biased but it was a really good CV.
That got me 0 fucking offers. ZERO
I rewrote my CV based on some google suggestions and with ChatGPT. I got through for every single job I applied ( 10+ ) and even received offers, finally landing a new role.
Stop talking shit.
SSO is the same login/password authentication flow, isn't it? Just its session is shared between services. Any password manager can handle that password-based authentication just fine.
Couldn't it render on demand (on click)?

Or when the mouse starts entering the target before the click at least?
> CI/CD workflows most likely

Yep, this is primary goal of this project.
The compositor doesn't render, Swift UI does.
> The belief that Russia is weak serves to sell more weapons

and if there were a belief that Russia was strong it would serve to sell ... fewer ... weapons?
I've been doing node for 10+ years and it was the python 2vs3 moment for me

I started using Rust for quick and dirty programs, web services, small frontend apps - and I noticed:
- slower to prototype simple things compared to node CJS
- equal or faster when compared to TypeScript
- faster to get complex things right
This article is so frustrating. Get yourself on the market before spewing this shit. I recently been on the lookout for a new job and my first CV was personal. Full of my own words and description of what I did in the last 10+ years as a software engineer. I'm a bit biased but it was a really good CV.
That got me 0 fucking offers. ZERO
I rewrote my CV based on some google suggestions and with ChatGPT. I got through
next stage on every single job I applied ( 10+ ) and even received offers, finally landing a new role.
Stop talking shit.
The Apple Arcade and Netflix versions give you double the Monkey Money as the microtransaction version. I agree they should have changed more, but it's not true they didn't adjust it.
This is running into the no-code problem of clear-enough requirements being as complex as the code, via Kolmogorov.
> Don’t use flowery prose.

I find this advice kind of ironic. The most people I know don't use flowery prose in their cover letters because they consider themselves some kind of overachieving artists, but because it appears to be expected. Writing cover letters is bullshitting time, although this is probably country/culture dependent. Fortunately I didn't have to write an applciation for a long time, but reading my own old applications gives me the chills, even though I got invited to an interview almost every single time.

If you don't want flowery prose, you have to set the expectation when writing the job posting. If your job posting appears to be written by your PR department you get cover letters written by your applicants personal PR departments. Or in other words: bullshit me in the job description and I will bullshit you in my cover letter.

This behavior is reinforced if you don't make it clear who will gonna read my application first. If I get the impression that my application will land on a desk of a hiring manager who doesn't know much about the job I might turn the BS to 11. If you communicate clearly that the person reading the application first knows what you are really looking for, I'll dial down.
> people think they need to understand what a monad is from a category theory pov before they can write meaningful code

Yes, this is a very strange belief
It seems like the coolest part of this isn't the systemd part necessarily (unless you're a systemd fan). It's that the combination of Quadlets + coreos gives:

- Node starts up with a container daemonized

- Automated updates of the registry image

- A nice single arg to pass to your cloud provider CLI userdata that launches the OS + container (vultr-cli in this case)

I guess you can do something similar with any linux userdata but the script wont be as clean. Has anyone built something lite to launch docker containers on boot in ubuntu (this is particularly helpful for cloud provider CLIs) without writing the whole script manually? Something nicer than `apt update && apt install -y docker && docker run --rm --restart-always ...` that includes the registry autoupdate.
It's the thing it does make more efficient, which was predictable.

And accuracy doesn't matter. If it's 99% and the powerful are whitelisted for human review, that's enough. That's enough to pull a mesh so fine over every human being on the planet, forever, that reaches deeply into them before they can even begin to form a personality.

The jump from individuals listening to individual phone calls as they were happening to what became possible in the decades after that might be smaller than the jump from that to the capability of transcribing anything anyone utters, even in their sleep, automatically, and adding it to a giant corpus of data to fish for suspects or assets or blackmail recipients in, in seconds. With then being able to act on those people as if they were a dataset (set a few flags, which systems or humans downstream heed without question, done).

It's a very grave threat, and I find it interesting that people decades ago who wrote about it called it that, but now that we're in it, we find it very easy to just shrug it off. But it's the same lethal threat to what it means to be human. Privacy is required for thought, without thought there's no humanity worth mentioning, QED.
Same as it ever was.

Profit.
EDIT: Having looked at this again, I'm not sure the Developer Tools privilege is even required to run essentially arbitrary software in Terminal. Homebrew still works without Developer Tools installed, as do interpreted runtimes. If I can even run an arbitrary shell script then the privilege is pointless, which makes the case for a dedicated sandbox for Terminal even more important.

This is my point, Terminal with Developer Tools privilege is essentially granting carte blanche privilege to every sub-process running there, which is not really necessary.

If I could pop a Terminal with a restrictive scope, allowing read and write access only within that directory tree it would be a much better situation than we have now. macOS' permission system isn't really that far away anyway - I can already disable Terminal's permissions to access anything else same as other apps.

Essentially a basic and very limited not-even-a-chroot would be a vast improvement and would still offer an adequate sandbox.
That'd not what they said: they made a claim that a single alphabet is insufficient, and thus Greek makes as good a choice as it was used historically too (and allows easy differentiation).

Math also uses made up symbols specific to math a lot (integral, summations, arrows, operators...).

If you want to claim that Greek is the problem, how would you solve the problem of insufficient symbols?