skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah I mean, I want to be respectful of Linux workflows and conventions. I just think it's hard to understand a situation where someone could put this much effort into improving the kernel and not get a contributor credit. Like, by the normal definition of the word it's definitely a contribution: it required a lot of technical skill to do, and he did try to follow kernel conventions when he was made aware of them. It's not really his fault that trying to contribute to Linux is a byzantine process where maybe no one will be at all nice to you.

> And that's where you run into the issue of this being posted to a security mailing list for all to see: you've essentially started the clock on something that you no longer control and fixing the but takes priority over other niceties.

Yeah, but on the other hand it's an obscure architecture and they took a few days to really process it. It also doesn't preclude them crediting him as a co-author.

---

I guess my overarching point is that, while this may be completely reasonable from a kernel dev's point of view--a person super steeped in kernel culture and processes--it's mostly nonsensical to everyone else. This issue is pretty simple. This guy did a bunch of work in good faith, tried to do things right, and some insider basically stole his thunder. That sucks! No amount of like, careful or sympathetic explanations of kernel workflows and semantics is really meaningful in the face of that.

I think the nail in the coffin is that everyone believes this happened right? No one needs to be convinced kernel devs are completely uncaring and insensitive. Maybe that attracts a certain crowd and maybe that's on purpose, or maybe it's just self-fulfilling, but at the very least it doesn't seem very welcoming. Either way, it doesn't bode well for the future.

EDIT: I said they took over a week to really process it but I misremembered, it was just a few days
Great point. I was more opposing their discourse and lack of any examples.
Yeah, that’s just not what the product is. It’s not targeted at helping people navigate roads, it’s for giving creators a more seamless way of getting footage in their everyday life.

Meta spent a crazy amount of money hosting a giant party at VidCon (a YouTube/TikTok/Instagram focused convention) and I haven’t really seen them pushing these glasses anywhere else. Casey Neistat did a review on the first-gen version in the context of how it helped him film. This really seems like a tool for creators at this point, even if it may morph into something else later.
We need an AI that can generate bespoke AI tests...
With grand promises rode the ploy
Venture capital, ahoy!
We make a lovable product to capture audience
Vendor lock them at the earliest convenience
Hey look at our awesome developer experience
Add ANSI and emojis and comments saying it’s genius
Some next level tech, plebs just don’t get it
Next round of funding, we’ve already spent it
I took the big dough, got puppets and framed it
R-O-I is bad though but layoffs gon’ fix it
Never mind the drama *cough* are ya gon’ install it
Run it, ship it, kill yourself with working on it
Entangle your business with it
Tell the client to deal with it
Bring it to the big wig
Get ’em to sign off on it
Crown your own sh*t
Dogfood is tasty, ain’t it
Whenever you are bored (e.g. waiting in line, commuting to work, stuck in a waiting room) use the time to "curate" the photos in your phone, removing duplicates or photos of things you don't want to remember.
If the sunglasses sit a normal distance from the face, most people's corrective lenses won't fit behind them.

There's a reason over-glasses sunglasses are so big and clunky and ugly.
My experience with flight sim, boxing, golfing, and building games feels a lot better with any sort of VR headset. There is also a weird thing where building stuff in VR taps into some primordial primate urge to build much moreso than other gaming media. I've built some structural stuff in real life and the sense of satisfaction of building in VR is nearly identical, which is an absolute trip.
Kind of, but most human relationships are somewhat regulated (marriage, parenthood, etc) so everyone has a framework on what to expect, do's and dont's.

Friendship is when everyone comes with a random set of expectations, all of them differing from person to person, and get disappointed when it doesn't translates to reality.
“$2,500 annual subscription” seems pricey for such a limited product but it’s an expensive car for wealth buyers.

Still good to see car companies push out improvements like this. Next version should be more capable, then the next version… Eventually we start to reduce the 1.3 million deaths and 10s of millions of injuries every year.
Now if Meta would only get that website layout of theirs working on this Chrome browser that runs on my two year old Samsung Android phone, they would be a whole lot credible to me.
Also, in direct response to the Gp, grocery stores buy sales data that contains their sales + their direct competitors down to the product level. It is anonymoized but freely available.

Edit: Also companies like Google scan emails for information. Amazon stopped including prices in their emails because Google was getting a direction stream of sales data with full costing info.
No because nature doesn't have intent.
This is exactly what I'm saying.
It's not really surprising that evidence points to ancient humans eating more plants. It'd be ridiculously energy-intensive to have to hunt down every meal.
While the article is poor and FSF's announcement [1] had been already discussed last week [2], still the anniversary of "the GNU operating system" is today.

[1]: https://www.fsf.org/news/forty-years-of-gnu-and-the-free-sof...

[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37566424
> Like, come on, a 14GB of a dump of mainly numbers that were constructed algorithmically are not "source".

So if I take a photo of a pretty sunset, release it under MIT license, you'd say it's "not open source" unless I give you the sun and the atmosphere themselves?

These models are perfectly valid things in their own right; the can be fine-tuned or used as parts of other things.

For most of these LLMs (not sure about this one in particular yet) the energy cost in particular of recreation is more than most individuals earn in a lifetime, and the enormous data volume is such that the only people who seriously need this should be copyright lawyers and they should be asking for it to be delivered by station wagon.
That's a slippery slope argument though. I am happy for the people you describe that they found a support group in HN comments for the impending demise of bitwarden but it's still just noise and doesn't nurture interesting conversations. Like the recurring "this webapp requires javascript", "signal is centralized", etc. It's becoming memes.
What level of AWS usage does it take to be able to get product leads "on the phone"? I'm guessing it is at least thousands of dollars/month in spend? Or am I wrong?

And 24 hours can be a long time, when TSHTF
The world can be divided into people who care about friends, and those that don't. Be careful who you marry.
and gains quite a bit due to rainfall
Most distros are built on top of a package manager, it's a critical piece of the entire platform. Homebrew and macOS are the exact opposite.
A multi-stage or continuous heat exchanger can transfer a lot more than half the heat.
> if I were to write an article titled "Program like the cowboys of old west" (I've no clue what that article will be about but)

It'd be about this! :D https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowboy_coding
I didn’t know this but it makes sense. Either way for most of the use cases (homelabs on residential internet speeds) either FBSD or OpenBSD’s PF will perform just swimmingly.
Well, given that he gave up that car in 1975, and no longer drives, I think we’re ok.
conversational ai seems to be the big ask. if you verbally prompt the particular path to it you could start by stating that 'ive read a lot of highschoolbooks', and 'my teachers always said, that' 2+2= 4.

the idea is to enable the promptor to review the information, and see for themselves, should they have need.
What the hell is actually this is?
I think you missed the "As a North European" part.
Is "Doom" open source?

The source code to the engine is available and open, but if you want to do anything useful or recreate the original game, you have to provide your own data.

This model is open source, much in a similar way that the Doom engine is open source.
To be fair the author didn't get it either so hard for me to blame GPT but was a bit wild to see the first example of success actually be a failure.
Why this is even a question? There are multiple evidences pointing to gatherer practices even before the Homo Sapiens race, hundreds of thousands of years prior. We see proof of omnivores on primates to this day. If anything, primates started as mostly herbivores and eventually developed hunting techniques
I have some inside information on how this plays out in Ontario, Canada, at least. One of my family members was a lawyer for the regional Children's Aid, and I worked for him for a few years. Another family member was a child protection social worker for two decades, but retired early because they felt the organization didn't prioritize the welfare of children (as is their mandate) but rather the needs of the organization or (perhaps more realistically) the needs of their own careers.

MANY social workers feel this way. They got into the field out of a genuine concern for the well-being of the most vulnerable members of our society, and instead found themselves dealing with politics (both real and office).

I'm not sure how it is in other countries, but in my region, they actually appoint a lawyer for the child. This is great, but it also tells you a lot about what everyone else's priorities are that children need their own lawyers:

(1) Parents want their kids back, of course. Not all parents are fit to get them back. But their lawyers fight for the return of their kids regardless of circumstances or reasons for their removal.

(2) Child protection agencies are under constant attack, so at the executive level, they lose sight of the individual kids and are instead worried about the needs of the organization and public relations.

(3) The social workers themselves are handcuffed to do anything about it and have to follow procedure, even if they can see it plainly that the procedure is not in the best interests of the child.

(4) Police want nothing to do with any of it and are quick to wash their hands of these situations.

(5) The children's lawyer somehow has to represent the needs of the child, which may place them at odds with their own clients (the kids).

(6) Activist groups will generally support the parents blindly, because by law, for the privacy of the children, the only parties listed above who can publicly speak about any given case are the parents themselves. So you can only ever hear one side of the argument. That's right: If a father, for example, sexually abuses his kids and as a result has them removed, he's free to say just about anything he likes about the matter, without ever acknowledging that he's a child molester. The other parties can't say a thing about this.

As a result, it's impossible, as a member of the public, to ever know whether it was appropriate or not that the children were removed from the care of their parents. I happen to know, from first-hand experience, that it's a mixed bag: Some parents shouldn't be allowed anywhere near any child ever, much less their own. Others are victims of a system gone haywire. And we, the concerned public, can't have an informed discussion about any of it.

All in all, it transforms child protection into a game of who-has-the-best-lawyers rather than trying to do what's right for the kids. Is it any wonder so many kids end up traumatized by this system?
In their defence, a lot of their past promises were explicitly conditional on receiving a level of funding which they did not receive until much more recently.

They still aren't making a 500 MW plant in 2030 though.
Ah, makes sense. Funny thing is I only added "stupidly" to make sure it didn't sound sarcastic. Perhaps "stunningly" would've been easier to parse. It's hard to find a superlative appropriate to her work.
Ok. Here is a lesson on forums. The comment thread you replied to is full of a guy trying to use a strawman argument. Except he stuck with the same one. You came along with a new strawman argument. So because you replied to a series of strawman arguments with a new attempt at a strawman arguments I wrote my comment in context of where it is in the thread of replies. So I congratulated you on being different. However, I then went on to shame you for using a strawman argument in the first place.

The lesson here, is always remember context. The point at which you start your input is surrounded with the context of before it. So if you were closer to the start the context of the previous strawman attempts wouldn't have been in play.
Comcert is verified functional code in coq that is translated to ocaml for execution, the compiler for which isn't verified. It doesn't solve the problem of verification of imperative code. The state of the art approaches to imperative code verification using coq ( such as https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/refinedc ) struggle to verify the basic college textbook algorithms and are extremely clunky in practice.
Presumably everything AWS offers is way more battle-hardened and with stricter SLOs just due to the sheer volume of their customers.

But people are way too afraid of simple tech these days. If there aren’t dedicated QA and Ops teams, at least 2k GitHub stars, it’s not web-scale™ and meant to run on a fleet of 726 servers at minimum, it’s not to be trusted!
Lisp C Compiler, Lisp-like syntax for writing C code
why companies are terrible

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

depressing
OpenAI tries to set a precedence for default approval for crawling and training AIs with copyrighted content. Compared to search crawling it doesn't proove to offer anything in return

More:
https://tomaszs2.medium.com/ai-may-pirate-music-and-movies-1...
"If addicts crave the effects of the drug and won’t be satisfied otherwise, then tolerance is a problem for them and they will require ever higher doses to stop the cravings."

This is exactly what I'm afraid of. Especially when it is very easy to overdose on fentanyl.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowboy_coding

And as an American, I would not be offended. Cowboy coders might be if the article is approaching it from the derogatory perspective.
Is the Physics of Time Changing?
Sounds like something a totalitarian would say.
Tell that to all the factory workers still moving parts around plants in small towns all across the US. Tell that to the healthcare workers at hospitals, assisted living facilities, and medical practices. May even tell that to construction workers, machinists, carpenters, HVAC guys, building controls, and even network engineers. You live in a fantasy world.
That is totally possible. One thing to watch out for is the fable of the fox and the grapes. The fox is unable to get the grapes from a high branch and so wanders away thinking "they are probably sour". It is just a reminder that sometimes when we can't get something we want we use a defense mechanism to protect our ego.

Kind of the point of "wisdom" though is the judgement to know when it applies and when it doesn't. Being on guard for common cognitive mistakes is a healthy part of self-reflection. It doesn't suggest that at all times and in all moments that you are in breach of some universal moral imperatives.

And so "being on the same wavelength" goes both ways. Although, if you find that you are always requiring others to always be on your wavelength and you are never willing to match theirs, that might be another thing to self-reflect on.
As always. I don’t know why people even pretend that it’s going to be a real thing. It’s like me saying I’m going to make my own jumbo jet.

You can toss together a shitty biplane but at the end of the day you can’t make the engine or the full size fuselage and there are no mechanics or factories for your jet so nobody is ever going to use it.
> "But given this has been live for 7 months and is very usable[sic] visible (see this reddit[link] thread where users in our ablation experiment noticed and called it a bug!)"

The reddit link & comment is just... chef's kiss
Due to unrelated and unexpected events, my mother, my sister, my sister's husband, and my wife's sister have all moved to within a few miles of my family within the past year. Previously they were all living in a different state from us. My father is dead, but having the rest of my close family nearby has made me so much happier. I wasn't unhappy before, but this much better yet.

I realize it's not a happiness booster in every circumstance. My wife moved a thousand miles specifically so she never had to suffer her mother again.
> However I have a few personal gripes: Firstly the board is completely wireless, which means I have to charge it via USB-C. As I'm sat practically tethered to my desk all day a permanently wired option would actually be more convenient as it would save me to the hassle of charging.

Does anyone else find this to be a pretty strange statement? If he doesn't mind the wire anyway, then just keep it plugged in via USB so it's always charged.
Yeah in your case might make more sense to try and convert your local friendships into close ones… not always easy for busy adults, though. All my close friendships from the last few years were cemented by doing trips together, even just short getaways like a weekend ski trip.

Sorry for my earlier comment suggesting you had no life, reads more aggressive than I intended :)
Because celebrity. These features don't solve any actual problems so they need something to drive traffic. Same as the metaverse abortion.
When I was young my youngest brother walked across a large firepit barefoot (no one realized it was still hot, the neighbor had been burning wood and the like outside).

He experienced 3rd degree burns on his feet and my mother rushed him to the hospital. My stepfather at the time was basically freaking out, my mother was very calm. After it was over the thing she told us is that panicking in an emergency helps no one.

It's a lesson I've kept with me my entire life. Most of the time, for me to truly process things, I need to be alone. I have no doubt I would come across as detached and not caring if something tramautic were to happen to me.

OTOH, I had to put a pet down once and I was crying like a baby so maybe not. I've never been in a situation where I haven't had time to process before really speaking about it to others so I really am not sure what my response would be.
Have you tried changing your default mail app to Safari? It will still try to mail the page but you'll at least stay within Safari. That's the best solution I could find. https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/261881/set-default...

Also found you on stackexchange while looking for an answer https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/108060/how-to-prev...
The legal system has this figured out
It has nothing to do with capitalism either but you decided to insert it because your pink haired sociology professor and Berkley told you so.
In Defense of Temporal Discounting in Longtermist Ethics
Antarctic sea ice hits lowest winter maximum on record: US data
For the cost of this object, we could have built 3 new subway lines in NYC WITHOUT dealing with our cost disease.

For the cost of the object, you could set up a university program to figure out Anglo cost disease, then build ~10 subway lines at Japanese costs.

Asking why our society funds things the way they do is a very reasonable and responsible question
Mutton is almost always goat meat in India. Sheep meat is labeled lamb.
But that is definitionly winning the competitive market. Amazon has a competitive advantage because they have the largest inventory and almost always the cheapest prices, or at least speedy delivery for a marginally increased cost.

That is the definition of winning a competitive market. The consumers win.
> Mathematics is an outlier.

Yes, but more illustrative of the innovation, because it's pure creativity, you don't need many resources apart from pen, paper, and time (at least historically that was the case).

Which is very different from many other sciences where you often need high level access to expensive equipment or other resources, which you won't get right away, but typically after you prove your worth (which takes years).
only 12 hours? :)

Fair point.
It's the New Yorker, one of the few remaining publications that prints serious longform peices, looking into a modern fad.
To be fair, that's a now-standard disclaimer for technology which is fundamentally non-deterministic.
I was thinking of an audio-based personal assistant running on the sunglasses, a la https://twitter.com/ggerganov/status/1640416314773700608
> FSD does not yield for emergency vehicle sirens while Drive Pilot does.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_d1nW2jtPr0
I was going to write a detailed answer to your comment, but after your P.S. and assumptions about my intentions, I think I have the same feeling about my hopes for a grounded and fruitful discussion with you.

All the best,

Have a nice day.
Show HN: Picklecast – Easily Screencast to a Raspberry Pi
This is exciting because it looks like BQN, but BQN had some unfortunate syntax in a few places.

Edit: I'll be specific. Stranding required a special character in BQN '‿', but appears to be just '_' in Uiua.
Quest 2 had 6
From the article and the comments here I can assume that I'm in the minority since I was ineligible for any financial aid and paid full tuition. We "qualified" for unsubsidized loans which I do not consider to be aid and did not take.

I consider my family to be middle class. We have one income for a family of five. Sending three kids to state college would cost us over $375,000. I've only sent one so far and it cost $130,000 with room and board for state college.

I guess our tuition is paying for everyone who got a substantial discount.
Structural Evolutions in Data
They may delay treatment for reasons other than just asking; my son was in the ER for 4 hours with a significant laceration (it resulted in two layers of over 2 dozen sutures each) before he was given anything as the nurses were not allowed to administer an analgesic (much less pain killers) until a doctor had examined him, and it took 4 hours for the doctor to get to him.

At no point was there any sign of the staff acting like there might be abuse or neglect involved.
I've used both extensively and I find eBPF+iptables (and sometimes nft) significantly more flexible and easier to use in the real world (not just simple examples) than PF. shrug
Yeah UAW just locked in the inflation we have experienced. I do not agree that they are being paid what they are actually worth. Unions are ruining this country.
You can make due with only a couple of good knots. Very short list: the reef knot (square knot, avoid the granny version) and the alpine butterfly (don't use reef knot for joining two ropes, i.e. a "bend"). The alpine butterfly is more useful to know than the bowline, IMHO.

If you want to expand your list a little, here are some additional useful ones: double fisherman's, adjustable grip hitch, sheet bend, trucker's hitch.

Edit: I suppose this is more useful with a little additional commentary. The reef knot is so common that you should know it and know how to avoid the granny knot and also when not to use it (e.g. as a bend). You can use the alpine butterfly as a bend and also for quite few other things. It is more versatile than the bowline (e.g. if you need a loop that doesn't slip) and works fine as a bend (very smiilar to the Zeppelin bend).
Scientists uncover a scaly surprise with new pangolin species
how are cows causing that much death?