skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>> Yes but if we had the ability to download a gun from the internet anonymously with no way to feasibly get the identity of the person downloading

But you can. There are blueprints for 3D printers circulating for a decade now ...
Whilst I mostly agree, and Node has arguably been forced down the browser-compatible route (for stuff like fetch() and web streams). There is a bunch of other stuff that isn't in Node, or it has it's own APIs for... alert/confirm for getting user input, Web Crypto, URLPattern etc. You can see them all here: https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/runtime/web_platform_ap...
Nah I'm pretty okay with it, and many other colleagues are as well.

Some of the outrage you see is to be attributed to people expecting fixes of their pet peeves and not getting them, I think.
In both cases I would assume for the bike to get the right of way and the car would simply stop and wait for the biker to go.

Either way, for the foreseeable future a human will still be sitting in the driver seat ready to make eye contact and wave you on.

What I'm more excited about is the idea that more and more cars will be able to automatically stop if they see people/obstacles in the street. I've almost gotten hit plenty of times while crossing intersections with stop signs because the car pulled up past the sidewalk too quickly.
oops, high-pass filter.
If there had been such a change or a discussion about whether to make such a change, presumably that'd be what the DoJ would have used as evidence instead of this.
> it was brought to the ER initially with fractures in the right side of the skull.

Just to defuse this a bit. My #4 used to collect skull fractures. He'd slip away in a nanosecond and would be 50' above us two heartbeats later. We put him in a padded helmet for a year or so. It stayed on sometimes.

As an adult he can still disappear in an empty room.
It's hard to overstate how true this is. Even something as simple as a 5-minute friendly chat a week can make a big difference.
Reminds me of an interview I sat in on in Cambridge a few years back.

Manager: "So, why should we hire you?"

Guy: "I have a Masters in CS from [University next door]"

Manager: "You and everyone else in this town. So, why should we hire you?"
Alpha experiment at CERN observes the influence of gravity on antimatter
Wow. That's an insane limitation.

My car with radar cruise and camera based lane centering: can go any speed, doesn't need a leader, handles terrible conditions (notably it sees better than I can during night time rain with glare from on-coming traffic), comes to a stop, starts from a stop, and handles some pretty crappy lane markings.

It don't handle sharp corners and doesn't auto-drive. It does, however, take 90% of the effort out of the place I spend most of my driving time - highways.
Ford halts work on $3.5B plant amid strike, forced labor probe
> Who will keep the hordes of dimwits and dilettantes and LinkedIn jockeys at bay

This is unironically a very serious problem and why most of the best open source projects are basically corporate FAANG projects that are really only open source for optics.
I guess your country also has no oil? But gas stations? Magic, I know! Or it has oil and no chip industry but you have a computer? Mind blown. If your country has oil and a chip industry, chapéu!
The language of the parent is in the past tense, i.e. they ran into these issues along the way during the release candidate phase.
In the early days of Safari after OS X became popular, there was a second wave of "Works best on IE" from OS X web developers who generally only tested on Safari.

Let's not pretend that Safari's raison d'être is to protect consumers from Google's browser.
Ford is doing the same thing. They want to force people to commit to it now.

I've decided that I have no interest in ever trying features in a car that will disappear once the subscription ends. Just not worth it.
This is a classic case of "easier said than done."

I live in a transition neighborhood and I take care of my elderly mother, who is rather entrenched. Neighbors come and neighbors go. I made friends with the couple next door and then they left. A long-time friend used to live a scant six miles away and I would walk there on some nights just to visit. Now, he is at a fifty-minute drive. Another friend is about a hundred miles off.

We are all at the mercy of our situations.
One of my tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories is that the US' 1980's "think of the children" PMRC campaign was aimed less at domestic vulgarity and more —after the culture war success of Disco Demolition Night— at keeping english-language Eurodance safely on the other side of the Atlantic ;-)
Vivek Agnihotri and String Vinod's Banned Podcast on “The Vaccine War”
Must watch esp. for all Indians.
Thanks for taking the time to check it out, you got it 100% right.

> I have no idea how to market this.

This made me laugh, thanks man one more time. :)
It's going the step from being a "driver assist" feature where the driver is liable for things to an autonomous hands off feature with MB being liable if it crashes while you're using it.
I've had to force my Hue bulb into zigbee pairing mode by holding a Hue dimmer switch very close, then pressing and holding the on and off buttons until the light starts to flash and stops flashing, then releasing the on/off buttons.
I moved into a similar situation. Rising housing costs plus neighbors 20-30 years older meant a lot of them were retiring elsewhere, and my neighbors are much younger now.
In the 4-way stop example, isn’t that what right-of-way rules are for? Not following those rules because you saw a hand gesture seems like it puts you at risk if there is an accident.

Maybe I’m misunderstanding your example.

https://topdriver.com/education-blog/4-rules-4-way-stops/
Isn't that a tax break for the client of the small businesses? A VAT reduction is not something they "cash in", it is something they use to pay less in taxes.
> maintainer wrote his own version, and by pushing the fix w/o attributing him, he effectively claimed that he did all the work from discovery to patching, incl. everything in between.

Woah this claim a bit too strong. There's a "reported-by" line in the final patch that ended in the kernel:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220609133245.573565-1-mpe@elle...

Whether that's sufficient is another matter.
29th of March 2012, to be specific for Servo.

> Initial commit

> @brson - committed Mar 29, 2012 - 0 parents commit 4825529 - Showing 1 changed file with 1,522 additions and 0 deletions.

https://github.com/jdm/servo/commit/48255297b8958fa559d11704...
This has been one of the most polarising conversations I’ve been a part of on HN.

Your comment made me think. I’ll preface this with an I also have code in your favourite web framework.

There are many people like myself who don’t care about attribution, and don’t understand people who care more about attribution than the project itself.

Then there are just as many people like you, who are only interested in contributing as long as credit is given. And you seem just as equally unable to empathise with my position.

And I feel like this is causing such a heated environment, because neither of these groups are seeing eye to eye.

Just a thought.
I'm not saying that LLM bots won't be a huge problem for the internet. I'm just commenting on the issues raised by OP.

Thing is there will be bad actors with resources to create their own LLMs so I don't think "regulation" is going to do much in long term - it certainly raises the barrier to deployment but the scale of the problem is eventually going to be the same as the tech allows one actor to scale their attack easily.

Limiting access also limits the use of tech in developing solutions.
On its face, you won't catch me arguing with that. It's a hard problem, for sure.
I follow your point about the OP maybe not understanding some context and well it's just a hard lesson learned.

I don't follow your fixation on sign-off. I am familiar with the guidelines. Like I said, sign-off is clerical. Yes it's obviously important, but it's still clerical. Nothing you've said changes that.

I agree there's obviously a middle ground here where both the maintainer was acting in the best interest of the community to get a security fix integrated and where the first-time contributor was perhaps miss-attributed in the commotion and feels slighted but also can learn a lesson. I'm not one of those out there calling for a witch hunt to cancel the maintainer (honestly I don't know where to those people are, but I'll take your word that you've encountered a few of them).

Still, your fixation on "well Ariel didn't sign off on the commit so all's fair" is pretty dismissive of the work Ariel did to get to the patch. The bug was acknowledged and outstanding. This obviously wasn't something massively problematic or the original bug would have been fixed when it was reported (I guess maybe it was misunderstood and it really was serious, but I don't get that vibe), so I don't think we're dealing with a case of urgency trumping all human decency.

At the end of the day, Ariel is a contributor. No not someone who has privileged commit access to the software, but a contributor to the project nonetheless, whether a maintainer copy-pasted the work or not. And hopefully someone who will continue to contribute in the future. I hope Ariel can come to see it that way whether the maintainer tries to make things right, or even just apologize for the confusion, or not.

I don't read Ariel sharing his experience as an attack. I read it in his words as:

> Well, I certainly didn’t feel inspired to get involved with the kernel community again. On the contrary, I felt belittled and angry that my work wasn’t properly recognized.

> My first contribution to the kernel was a really frustrating and discouraging experience, dealing with people who do not think it’s important to get proper recognition for your work.

I, at least, hold the "lkml bureaucracy" to higher standards.
That adesso is easily the closest thing I've seen! Thanks for that! I hadn't come across that one before!

Do you know if the 'front' can raise up like the 4000 can? Like this https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71FzIG1rqBL.jpg
When I did my study they said it as >90 times an hour when sleeping on one side and something like >60 on the other. I did a pulse ox test first and the results recommended a sleep study (which was not all that conducive to a good sleep they way it's performed)

Note, you don't actually regain consciousness that often (but if you wake up every 90-120 minutes to pee, and/or snore a lot, your body is telling you something) but it does keep you from getting a deeper sleep. I hadn't dreamed in years because I'd never drop into REM state.

I used to sleep 4-6 hours a night (but rarely felt tired) now I sleep 5.5 - 7 and am much better rested.
> and only want to prove that lower prices is good, but that conversation ended

When you respond to me and bring something up, it comes off as if you are trying to refute something that I am saying.

If you are now that that I was correct completely, and that you were just bringing up a separate point that is irrelevant and does not refute anything that I said, well then OK?
It intrigues but doesn't surprise me that most comments are "here's why this is hard/not possible/unfeasible". I think that part is obvious, the reason this article needs to be said is because it makes a significant difference. Prioritize it higher. That won't make the difficulties going away, but as you might prioritize being close to your work, a school for your children, other activities, being close to friends or community is important.

I've done both, living alone for long periods of time and living with community houses (which weren't really friends) and living near to close friends. Living nearby to close friends has been vastly more rewarding than any other option.
This only has to do with mismatch of the scope of HN and the scope that you are interested in.

Hacker News seems to me a news aggregator, just with a certain limited scope.
But 40 hours includes 32 hours. If you can produce a huge output in 32 hours then you can produce a huge output + 8 hours worth of work in 40 hours.
The pro peloton doesn't use an ELO system. There is a points system based on races placement, but outside of the team promotion/demotion every three years it's basically useless, especially for the individual riders.
They also have a 50% discount for upgrades as well.
> Basically, you want to replace statistics ("large enough samples will average out variation") with AI

No. This is misunderstanding due to my lack of clarity. Apologizes.

The biggest problems with Medical data is that 1) incredibly small scale data is collected to make assertions, 2) the data is horrendously de-normalized

In Radiology, a common validation approach is have radiologists review cases on the order of 250 studies to make assessments about a radiology product. This is considered the gold standard for FDA. Look into it more, vaccines, treatments. The sample sizes are fucking tiny.

The statistical assertion is that these relatively small samples capture the variation sufficiently to demonstrate efficacy across devices, treatments. These are then extrapolated to the US and wider populations. Do you believe that this is rigorously true?

The rationale underpinning this is simply practicality. You cannot get thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of patients/doctors/etc to get a strong signal and confidence. For drugs, it's super hard, but for devices and software interventions, it way easier to get data.

That brings us to the second big problem: the data structure is completely highly varied and denormalized.

1) From a pure structure point of view, it's basically free text fields that doctors sporadically fill.

2) From a underlying truth point of view, each hospital across the world has different protocols for care delivery. A histopathological FNA procedure might have a completely different meaning in CA, NY, or EU. This might simply be because of workflow, timeline, or just people using the words wrong.

What I mean with AI+Sensors:

AI doesn't need to solve the problem of intuition around medical problems. The biggest impact will likely come from the relatively mundane task of simply structuring and normalizing the data. Sensors simply help to generate more data

To be more concrete, you don't want (and shouldn't trust) this:

Prompt: "Please diagnose this person"

You want this:

Prompt: "Here is 100 TB of data from 100 different hospitals each with different workflows and patients for histopathology. For each patient, synthesize a CSV with the following schema "AnonPatientID, AnonCaseID, Pathology Result, Pathology stage, Incidenctal findings, ..."

Then I can do the analysis myself.

Hope this makes more sense.

(I work in healthtech and med device and I promise you: Demoralization at the state of medicine is a rite of passage after which you can begin to address practical problems)
Is the trend mainly due to ZK being written in Java?
for people outside of tech, apparently not. I get it - all they know is this thing they've been called many times and just see it's a pejorative. It's a little grating when he says it was misused intentionally by tech overlords to paint concerned people as anti-progress (he says this in the 99% interview), but I get where he's coming from - some people use just as an insult to throw around, whether or not they know the source.
The problem of AI won't be forbidden knowledge but mass misinformation.
> They aren't punishing sellers by pushing them to page 2. They are increasing sales by getting more likely purchases onto page 1.

are they, though?

I'm not convinced that it's a total coincidence that sellers who sell for cheaper elsewhere are being penalized in search results, especially if the excuse is that a multi billion dollar company which relies upon search can't do search.

And honestly, that seems anticompetitive to me, thus wrong and illegal, thus the suit.

> They would not be doing things to reduce purchases

I haven't seen any evidence the anticompetitive behavior in question would reduce total income in the long term. They would be doing things to punish sellers for selling cheaper elsewhere though, and seems like they are. That doesn't necessarily mean reducing purchases though, especially if Amazon has already copied the product and started selling their copy themselves. And whether it reduced some purchases (but not others) for Amazon is irrelevant, as they could easily be willing to threaten taking a tiny hit to punish competitors.

You keep coming up with pretexts for the anticompetitive behavior, but they simply aren't a more convincing explanation than anticompetitive behavior. It's like saying you didn't stab a guy, he just ran into your knife 100 times. Maybe technically possible, but not convincing, and definitely not more likely than maliciousness. If it walks like a duck, etc.
Not really sure what you are looking for, but the easiest might be to just add lags of your input variables in the same linear model that you are using.

If you are looking for an actual timeseries method I would checkout either darts [0] or statsforecast [1]. They are currently the most mature timeseries packages.

[0] https://unit8co.github.io/darts/
[1] https://github.com/Nixtla/statsforecast
I'd say it's a strange umami flavor. Tasting something gamey triggers something in my head that says, "oh this is animal scent". Maybe it's more olfactory than flavor?
I see multiple new articles a day on this. Even covering what can be covered is news haha https://gizmodo.com/judge-says-google-cant-keep-hiding-docs-...
There is definitely a risk but I don't like the way many compagnies approach it: by entirely banning the use of their models for certain kind of content, I think they might be missing the opportunity to correctly align them and set the proper ethical guidelines for the use cases that will inevitably come out of them. Instead of tackling the issue, they let other, less ethical actors, do it.

Once example: I have a hard time finding an LLM model that would generate comically rude text without outputting outright disgusting content from time to time. I'd love to see a company create models that are mostly uncensored but stay within ethical bounds.
Factory might not be a done deal - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37677943
I do. I have a Bolt EUV and turn on SuperCruise (hands-off but only on divided freeways) when I can, adaptive cruise control when I can't.

The car handles speeding up and slowing down for me based on what the car in front is doing. I just have to steer. I know that jumping lanes is not going to get me there much sooner but it's hard to resist "competing" to get there first.
Power, greed? Why do CEO's make 100x their employees? Some things just don't make sense.
That's a bit of a strawman though, no? I'm definitely not worried about AI being used to write erotica or researching drugs, more about the societal effects. Knowledge is more available than ever but we also see echo chambers develop online and people effectively becoming less informed by being online and only getting fed their own biases over and over again.

I feel like AI can amplify this issue tremendously. That's my main concern really, not people making pipe bombs or writing rape fanfiction.
As a parent I foresaw that I would make acquaintances with others who go to the park, or live on the street. So far we exchange polite pleasantries but there's just nothing beyond that. It should be unsurprising, the prospect of any change in routine is more uncomfortable and daunting when you're a busy parent, and friendship invites more overhead. There are friends I made after moving to a city that I barely want to see now, mostly because there wasn't enough in common in the first place.

Strategy wise if you're unattached and have free time, making commutes to events and planned activities is still a more effective way to make friends.
Now you have to securely deliver those keys to the cameras and people have to keep them up to date. With smartphones it's a bit easier because that can just be pushed to the phone automatically but for news orgs and other professional outfits their camera's aren't internet connected. So then you have a weird mishmash of deciding if an out of date key is being used because it's been cracked/stolen or if the NBC stringer just didn't update their camera before heading to the event.
Even when it’s earnest it’s always some field outside the competence of the speaker. So we get computer scientists warning about people engineering bio weapons, as if the lab work involved was somehow easy.
This model will run on Ollama, llama.cpp, and other tools:

ollama run mistral

or for llama.cpp, thebloke has uploaded the GGUF models here:
https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Mistral-7B-v0.1-GGUF/tree/ma...
and you can run it

really looking forward to the chat fine-tuned models that doesn't seem to be available yet.
This is my hello world test for coding assistant for LLMs. CodeLlama and GPT4 crush the answer. I love seeing innovation in the space but Mistral kind of failed me on my first test:

---------------------

>>> Write code that will track swipes in Typescript

.
Swipe should be detected when the user moves a finger over 30% of the screen, and then drags it all the way to the end of the screen.

## Getting started
You need to have yarn or npm installed before you can run this app

### Running in browser
```bash
yarn install
yarn serve
```

### Running with docker
Use the docker-compose file located at ./docker/docker-compose.yml
```bash
cd <path-to-project>
docker-compose up
```

## Screenshot
![Screenshot](./images/screenshot.png)
Thems were a bunch o words
Both are amusingly over-complicated.

You don't need a database, just an in-memory cache. All you're storing is recent weather info, which you get from an external server. Caching is just to prevent hitting the external server too hard.

Then the program becomes a single-file executable, which means you can get rid of Docker.

If you set this up to run under FCGI, it can run on some $5/month shared hosting account.
I had one 75% keyboard, but didn't like that extra column on the right. Now I have a custom build (6x14 keys) keyboard (much better IMHO).
"How to drive as many teenagers as possible into madness?" AI: "Build a website where they can upload pictures of themselves and others can make comments about there appearance."
Isn't deno running locally no your self-hosted instance? How are they charging?

Enqueuing a Message: Each enqueue action translates into a KV write operation.

Receiving a Message: Every received message entails a KV write, and a single request charge.

I would be really curious to know. Are they only talking about Deno Deploy in the cloud, with FoundationDB? Is this "open core"?
I really wish there were more options out there with the Apple keyboard layout on the bottom row, notably with the right edge of the Command and X keys aligned. The Magic Keyboard is so comfortable to use on a Mac but the typing experience could definitely be improved.
> The system will also deactivate when other requisite conditions are not met, as well as when an emergency vehicle is detected, when approaching toll roads, in construction or special regulation zones, or _if a pedestrian or cyclist is detected_

Wait for the abuse other road users will get for causing the expensive autopilot to switch off.