skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe you are correct, since unsubbing from a podcast will likewise delete all episodes associated with that podcast.
GammaRay for Qt 3.0.0 is released
Just googled a recipe for Mrouzia (in German):

https://www.ziiikocht.at/2012/06/mrouzia-sues-lammfleisch-mi...
It's not that different to Wikipdia. Trust, but verify. It's usually correct, but regardless it's a useful starting point for a topic.
That's exactly my sentiment. The main issue with this, it's like telling Apple how to do their job. Like , "you guys don't know how to build hardware and software that works really well together"

It's well meaning but ultimately flawed. So long as humanity works "competitively" instead of sharing technology for the greater good - companies like Apple are the good guys, not the bad guys. They are trying to make the best products they can THEIR way because that's how this competitive market works.

So now EU is like "no no no you don't understand how to make good products, in fact you have no identity - you just build hardware and let people do whatever the F they want with it¨
> Again, my grandfather bought an entire apartment building from wages earned watching paint dry.

It's not sustainable, or even just possible on a larger scale. You can't have people doing simple, low paid jobs owning apartment buildings, as that means there'd need to be a 100+ million apartment buildings (or investments of comparable value) in America.
Which is basically what the proposal is https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pipeline-operator#this-prop...
Without looking and off the top of my head - Joy Division, John Foxx-era Ultravox, Gary Numan (probably by way of John Foxx... Erm. There are others. Can I peek now?
This article misses the long-term perspective.

Which is: there will likely be some hydrogen infrastructure for fuelling long-haul trucks, which will likely not be BEVs but rather FCEVs.

As soon as this infrastructure is there, there will be all sorts of secondary effects of this, reducing operating costs for FCEV cars.

Also there are already (with BEV cars only making up a small percentage of all cars) issues with grid stability popping up in many countries and they're going to get much more serious than now.

Yes, BEVs can help dampen short-term (up to maybe 48 hours) intermittency but beyond that, they won't help much.

And as soon as the price fluctuations of flexible electricity contracts to incentivize charging of BEVs off peak get painfully high so they effectively make the flexibility of driving exactly when you need/want (which is the whole point of owning a car) expensive .. people will probably become more interested in FCEVs which don't have this effect.
The bar for "doing good" is much higher at Google. Think 1bn users.
There is a deep satisfaction of finally being separate from Government, Market and other people.

Witnessing Liberty die from underground Nevada is sad.

Watching Liberty die from Mars with a deck chair in a glass dome and beer in hand, is lovely and freeing.
I switched from iOS/Overcast to Android/PocketCasts and I found it had a number of benefits which I struggle to recall now... batch downloads might be one of them.

My main bug bear is how how some screens are drawers and some screens are pages which makes navigation confusing. Even after years of use, I still keep accidentally closing the drawer screens when trying to scroll and trying to navigate backwards which isn't allowed. Please... just make them all pages so they behave consistently with the same navigation and gestures.
Even more cynical, small kids were sent into said machines to conduct maintenance while the machine was running!
Cunningham's Law.
nil interfaces are not equal to nil values in Golang. Interfaces are fat pointers with a type and value pair and if the type is populated then the pointer as a whole will not compare to the `nil` value as it requires both elements to be nil. Frankly, I think this was a design mistake.
yeah if you want an open phone buy an android one and run an open os like grapheneOS
OpenBSD: Introduction to Sysclean(8)
DavX5 is life changing
So, can we use "just learn to use promps" for white collar folks and software devs risk loosing their jobs because of AI?
That exact sentence jumped out at me too. It's amazing how blasé we can be about such, once red-pilled, obvious annihilation.
Have this in too many countries, and we’ll have a world war on our hands again.
> We all like the feeling of credit, but this context is very important.

Exactly, this is why a field "co-authored-by:" is a nice middle ground that allows for providing partial credit to the original author while maintaining maintainer's freedom to rewrite the whole damn thing.
Implying ripping children out of their families willy-nilly is "more developed."
You can buy both open razors and phones that allow side-loading right now and I suggest to keep it that way.
Even if the kids hemorrhaging continued, it was brought to the ER initially with fractures in the right side of the skull.
Well I'm saying work on what you want to work on and it's absolutely fine to abandon games when you think you've detected the direction is not good. Finishing a game is very, very hard. You will almost inevitably encounter problems that require skillsets you don't have and aren't interested in learning. If you could to a place where a game could be finished, then hire a team to help you finish it. Otherwise you'll spend too much time learning skills you don't like or need (personally) to execute on a vision. For most indie devs, in my estimation, that's mostly a question of hiring artists to make it look nice and designers to grind out content for the game (e.g. levels). I think you can presume that most people that want to be "indie game devs" want to be creative directors with just enough skills of their own to prototype something successfully. And I encourage that.

The co-op thing is just a perceived niche of under-served market demand : effort required imo.
Chicken breast is absolutely not forgiving. It gets tough and dry almost instantly.
Right - because this library tries to fake a new language syntax feature without the actual support for it, it ends up being the worst of both worlds. Even ignoring the lines-of-code explosion, the non-standard use of parens/spacing makes it incredible difficult for me to parse.

Props to the author for trying out something neat, but this is probably a bit to clever for my liking.
Many of which were dropped for 64bits ARM.
https://github.com/evanw/OES_texture_float_linear-polyfill
>> But I can’t lower my prices anywhere off Amazon because they will retaliate by burying my product where nobody will find it.

This is the problem.
HTML The Ultimate Guide, By Sufyan bin Uzayr, Published July 28, 2023 by CRC Press

ISBN 9781032413259

I also saw a lot of books from 2022.
This is correct. In .NET Gen 0 heap, if there is sufficient space, the allocation is just getting a heap address from threadlocal, bumping an offset, writing object header and methodtable, and returning the pointer (reference).
For my own tools i use python-responses for mocking the api responses and i have an seperate tool to check if my api calls still work.
Show HN: A Better “Find My Friends”
There are typically multiple ways to write code to address a given issue. They might differ in aesthetics (including clarity of intend), but also performance, maintainability, extensibility and robustness. It's not uncommon that those who wrote the code to be fixed rewrite the patch in order to improve on aforementioned properties while avoiding lengthy back-and-forth when asking for improvement of the patch. They are often in a better position to do so due to familiarity with the code, it's history and (unwritten) development path.

That is by no means plagiarism. If not communicated clearly, can however lead to disappointment of those who submitted the patch. An 'inspired-by' comment would have been nice.
Please try Rogan ghosht if you have not. That recipe when done right is the perfect mutton curry ever made. This is a recipe from North India, then there's South Indian mutton curries that tastes quite good, particularly the ones in South of Tamilnadu.
> Their work needed this. The company needed this to work better, and they deserve the credit for doing the work. This is not open for discussion in my opinion.

Why is it not open for discussion? I can’t just fill in a pothole or cut my neighbours grass and expect credit and/or compensation. OSS isn’t common property. You can’t just do whatever you want and expect to receive credit.

Yeah, their work needed a fix and they got a fix. That’s already a better than average outcome.
> Do we measure software engineers in terms of their lines of code per day? I feel that this is basically what you and others are doing when you compare writing or illustration to digging holes. You're seriously misunderstanding the economy of these fields. Productivity has almost nothing to do with the market for art or writing.

Depends very highly on what kind of art we're talking about.

There's the "I get my stuff into galleries" artist. This IMO has an extremely high social component. It's in good part about who you know, how well you can spin your work, how much some rich guy has paid for it in the past, etc.

There's the "I sell commissions on Deviant Art" artist. That's to me a kind of hole digging position already. Certainly you need to produce good work, but what seems to make a good artist in that scope is good work, reliably, fast.

There's the "I illustrate stuff" artist. A more properly commercial version of the above. From my limited experience there's demand to pump out work quickly and as cheaply as possible. Eg, a book may need a cover or a few illustrations, or an ad might need something drawn on it. In many cases the client is basically looking for a hole to fill. The cases where somebody wants to have something truly beautiful that lots of effort went into seem vanishingly rare. There's a reason why corporate styles like "Alegria" exist and are annoyingly common.

There's the "I draw comics" artist. Those need extreme consistency because they're on a tight deadline.

> Do you know and follow any AI artists?

Honestly, I'm beginning to. AI is just a tool like any other. Some people use it to faff about and make random stuff, but I'm starting to notice people using it to produce things that have a coherent plot or tell a story, or at least keep a consistent setting. It's still janky at this point because it's hard to maintain consistency.

Really, there's nothing weird about that. Think about supremely lazy things like Garfield or Ctrl+Alt+Del. They still had a following even when graphically they were supremely lazy. If you can copy/paste body parts to assemble a comic and still get some people interested, no reason why you couldn't do it with AI. Heck, it'd come out looking better at this point.
In other words ‘I don’t care to learn a thing out of my bubble.’
I wrote this: https://ja.nsommer.dk/articles/x86-debugger-for-windows-and-...

It's a debugger for Windows (and Wine), like the one in the article, written in C. It uses software breakpoints (infinite breakpoints)
ehhh but then they reproduce :')
I wonder if this realistically has any impact.

I'm pretty sure my system fonts are a near-unique set. https://www.amiunique.org/fingerprint indicates that 0.0% of the net has the same set of system fonts.

OTOH, I know that installing user fonts (e.g.: non-system wide) is supported on fontconfig (Linux, BSD, etc), and I've done it in the past... but is this even common enough to make a difference?

Edit: my set of fonts is unique and I only have 6 fonts installed.
> I want to run Firefox on my phone

It's simple, don't buy an iPhone. If you say "But I want an iPhone because is better than any Android", than you have to think that maybe iPhone is better because of the more restrictive rules.
That's a good point. A nuance to that would be that not every field impacts the economy, or put another way, our economies work with a lot of inefficiencies.

There could be a future where the fields that matter the most are heavily impacted and most of the work is automatized, while a flurry of other parts are strictly kept off AI and automatization.

I have in mind the extent to which agriculture requires way fewer people that we'd imagine given its scale and importance, while we have people making money doing funny faces on camera [0].

[0] that's also absolutely needed by the society, but it's not at the same primary level
In my hobby project, I started always passing an allocator argument to every function or object which requires allocation (inspired by Zig) and I love it so far. Often I can just pass a bump pointer allocator or a stack-based allocator and do not care about deallocation of individual objects. I also wrote a simple unit testing framework to test out-of-memory conditions because it's easy to do when you're in control of allocators. Basically I inject an allocator which calculates how many allocations are done when a unit test is run, and then unit tests are later rerun again by injecting OOM at every known allocation point. A lot of bugs and crashes happen when an OOM is encountered because such paths are rarely tested. The idea of my pet project is a very resilient HTTP server with request-scoped allocations and recovery from OOM without crashes.
> significantly cheaper

On the back of VC funding and operating at a loss? This isn't a great argument, TBH, and prices have increased to the point that they're generally in line with "real" taxis in places I've been -- and still without Uber and Lyft having become profitable.
And its wonky spinoff bitreich
Microsoft got hit with it because they shipped IE with Windows by default
I don’t think the reason of “I already applied to all the better sounding ones, but they all ghosted me” is gonna win too many points either.

It really depends on the market. Sometimes there are great looking companies that you really would like to support because they somehow seem awesome to you. But you don’t always have that luxury.

> A cover letter is also supposed to explain why the company should want you to work for them.

For the generic cover letter that’s a reasonable thing to focus on. I’ve seen plenty of application forms that specifically ask the “why do you want to work for us” question (or even worse: “why do you want to work for us rather than our competitors?” which is even harder to answer, especially if it’s a tiny startup you’ve first heard of by reading their job post on LinkedIn).
Any tips to setting up macOS dotfiles? I set up a new Mac today and was going to go that route but after trying to do a diff of "defaults read" and seeing that its thousands of lines largely unrelated to macOS I gave up and changed the obvious things using the settings menu and now just have to deal with all the other minor differences as they popup.
There's a difference between doing the best you can, and behaving dishonestly.
> even a bundled browser (Evolution or something) that is based on Firefox

The Gnome web browser is based on WebKit (Safari) not Gecko (Firefox): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Web
The breed, age, sex and method of slaughter makes a difference for both sheep and goats

In South Africa lamb is part of our culture and often the most sought after meat, if you can afford it. It's used in pie, various stews, curry, samoosas, roast, braai(BBQ), grilled, fried, etc.

The innards are not forgotten either https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skilpadjies
Athletes might be an example. But yes, once robotics advances, there won't be that many left.
> The developer could have accepted that allegedly inferior fix, give the credit, and patch it with their own version in a single commit.

My best oss contribution was done exactly like this. Someone else reviewed my code, made some changes, but my name was on the commits. I was happy that someone else took the time to make my code better and at the same time, keep my name on it.
This sucks. You went above and beyond and then got undermined by a senior Linux contributor. I think that many people have low social skills in software development. And this is an example of that. I suspect the intentions were not malicious just that the senior contributor doesn’t care about your feelings or values, your work or ensuring you get credit for your efforts.

I think your main recourse is writing articles like this as there is nothing else.

Maybe next time try not to involve this particular OSS contributor?
Monads don’t go by the name, they must satisfy the axioms. How many people do it right? Even in Haskell lots of folks forget to check the axioms. Also, monads are hard to compose. I think there’s no reason to be like Cats or Arrow. It’s all already there, the mental shift is minimal in my opinion.
Probably a misguided idea of security. There is nothing wrong with JS itself, in fact, as far as languages go, it is pretty secure due to the attention it gets by being what runs in web browsers.

As for "curl | sudo sh", yeah it looks scary, but it is not worse than downloading a .deb and then doing "sudo dpkg -i your.deb", or installing any downloaded binary on your machine for that matter. You may say something about signatures, but often, the public key you have to trust is on the same website you downloaded the .deb. In all these cases, TLS is the only thing protecting you. Going through a file you don't audit doesn't change anything, and in practice, almost no one does the audit, and few linux boxes have AV scanners.

Don't trust it? Run it a VM, container, or dedicated hardware, this is actually what they are suggesting.
https://archive.ph/ZUiC7
Seeing some of the responses in this thread, I hope some of you never manage people, especially anyone junior/mid.

If you have a (eager) junior on your team and they contribute a helpful, but sub-par quality PR for some issue, the worst possible way to handle the interaction is admonish them for not being good enough, throw their code in the bin and then rewrite it yourself.

You’ve destroyed morale, wasted their time and yours, ensured that they haven’t learnt anything - and thus won’t be able to improve or meaningful contribute next time and you’ve likely dissuaded them from asking for help or volunteering for anything next time. Even if they waded into a hectic past of the codebase, there’s better ways to handle this interaction.
This is what, the third class of side channel attacks that need to mitigated?

I think at some point we may have to stop and rethink the entire modern computing architecture; either that or stop running untrusted code by default. It seems these issues will inevitably come up again and again.
Sounds like Apple, with their trillions of dollars and apparent focus on quality, should invest into figuring out an OS-level permissions system then, which I presume they already do have. The OS should be handling such issues, not the App Store from which apps come from. Even if the user installs some botnet willingly, it shouldn't be able to break out of the OS sandbox and do things the user doesn't want simply because it was sideloaded (assuming a non-jailbroken/rooted phone which no non-technical user will ever accidentally find themselves with).

> These big corps hate that apple have that control and want to keep their customers informed on what's going on...

Oh yeah, the noble small Apple - the richest and biggest corporation to have ever existed - only has their user's best wishes in mind... It's totally unrelated to their own ad network, which they're building on top of the data they exclusively have access to thanks to their walled garden! And no, I'm not saying others should have access to this data, this data shouldn't be able to be used at all, not by Apple nor anyone else.

> ... they will stop using the App Store and ask customers to side load so they can release much more invasive versions of their apps that track everything without any user ever being informed

If the only thing protecting users from this is the fact that you can't sideload and have to rely on the App Store review process, then that's some real shit security, and Apple should definitely improve things there.

> So yes, this IS objectively a bad thing and ripe for explotation.

Funny how saying something is objective doesn't make it so. It's objectively bad for Apple, sure, since they lose their iron-tight grip on their own users. They also lose out on that sweet 30% of every penny a dev makes. Won't find me shedding a tear for them though, the less money Apple and the other megacorps get to suck dry, the better.

And again, all they have to do is spend a few thousand of those trillions of dollars they have to put up an obnoxious and hard-to-get-rid of warning when sideloading. People who care about sideloading like myself will happily oblige and go through the warning screens even if they're tedious, while the hypothetical vulnerable grandmas get greeted with a screen they don't know how to work around.
Yes, as others have said. However, this is a legitimate question, because in these specific cases, the burden of proof tends to be on the side of the defendant who needs to prove they didn't harm their child. That's obviously impossible, and probably unconstitutional.

When medical experts claim they're 100% confident that this child was violently shaken at this specific time, and that you were the only person with the child at that time, how can you defend yourself when you haven't done anything? There's nothing you could ever do to convince courts that your word has more value than the confidence of highly reputable experts with decades of experience.

This is an instance where the prosecution's case relies on the confidence in medical authorities, and where it is extremely hard to challenge it as the subject is so difficult on a scientific and technical level. In the US and other adversarial jurisdictions, you see an incredible level of technicality during oral debates, with extensive and long-running discussions around extremely obscure points related to the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the infant nervous system in highly specific pathological situations, where infants frequently suffer from multiple rare medical conditions or risk factors. Few people in the world have the required expertise, and even fewer accept to testify in courts! There's also an obvious financial imbalance between the State and the defendant.

In inquisitorial jurisdictions like France, this is even worse as there's basically no system in place to challenge the views of the State's experts.

So, yes, litigating these cases is extraordinarily challenging because the only way to prove the defendant's innocence is to challenge the opinion of overly assertive medical experts by digging into highly difficult (and multidisciplinary) science.
That's the point, the oil from the seasoning process (or rather, the residue it leaves behind) is not dirt, it's an actual layer of coating - and if you use soap on it you wash away the coating.
Unfortunately with many gotchas to be aware of all the time…
Deus Ex for me is the greatest game of all time. I played it when I was around 12 years old, it had just come out. The graphics already looked 'old' in 2000, but it didn't matter. The sequels are actually pretty good too, IMO, but can't touch the original.

I still go back to play it from time to time, although I always play the sneak-thief kind of character, it just seems so much more fun!
Epic failed.
Mac OS X Server version 1.0 was Rhapsody 5.3. It still doesn't make sense even if you know the MacOS System was renamed to OS 8 to kill the clone license.