skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I do not see a reason to double take due to that. Asking your spouse for help seems pretty normal, and 99.9% of aircraft mechanics that travel abroad on a moment’s notice for emergency repairs being men, 90% of which are married to women, also seems normal. Even in 2023.
Commoditize their complements: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/
Yes, this is correct.

All accidents, no matter how minor, have to be documented and the documentation kept for 5 years though.
Movement on foot is limited to about 5 kph at a brisk walking pace, and under combat conditions is probably half or less of that. Ten minutes gives about 400--800 metres effective movement.

Mechanised armour can move more quickly but is still likely limited to 25--50 kph, or 4--8 km maximum movement within 10 minutes.

Compound this with extensive use of mines and movement is slowed even further.

The situation strikes me as akin to WWI's trench warfare, in terms of the relative immobility of the combatants along the front line. And yes, there's some use of trench warfare in the region, but the vulnerability of rear operations for ranges of tens or even 100s of kilometres under modern conditions is critical. The odds of a continued scorched-earth campaign seem likely.

Not mentioned is the degree to which foreign intelligence capabilities are delivering information on troop movements, though I strongly suspect both satellite and signals intel (much of that gained from just outside the combat theatre) is playing a key role.

This means that the most effective countermeasures are all but certainly cutting off both C3 (command, control, communications) and resupply routes. Here it seems Ukraine has the general advantage, though cutting resupply especially to Crimea (rail and bridge routes) and the Donetsk regions are key. Russia's limited capability to provide weapons and munitions (and likely increased reliance on cheaper options such as mines, drones, and cluster munitions, or stand-off munitions such as long-range missiles. The latter are expensive and limited in effects, and Russia's used these extensively against civilian targets.

Air superiority would be the other element that could be decisive, though it's expensive to maintain, and neither side here has yet been able to accomplish it.

And of course, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and Iran are likely paying close attention to how things are playing out and the relative costs and benefits of specific tactics, strategies, weapons, and intel systems.
various multi-media art installations
The problem with the speed of the melting is that neigter we, nor the nature has time to adapt. For anybody arguing that it has happened before, it did take hunderts or thousands of years. In this time plants were able to change theyr location by natural groth and migration. With the speed it is happening now, large areas might loose important plants.

For example the swiss mountains are quite heavily populated. Those areas are often protected from loose rocks using forests. If it gets to hot for a type of tree, they might die. Those protections need to be replaced by safety constructions, which cost millions. Also the construction takes time.

The same thing happens with water reservoirs. In other countries all water in the summer comes from glaciers. If the glaciers are gone, all rivers will dry up.

On the bright side, we currently have negated the next ice age that comes in 10'000 years. We wont get glaciers hunderts of kilometers long all across switzerland. If we survive that long...
I think they quickly reached the limits of CPU inference and that's why they decided to scale up with GPU's.

Because of how they operate, they can't just release in a single DC like other providers. It's a partial "all or nothing" scenario.
Interesting. Did the earlier Raspberry Pi Broadcom SOCs not have an IOMMU? If they did I would have expected the 5 to be compatible with older ones.
Did you have a negative view of Spirit before flying with them?

Not sure about my backside.. don't do squats lol ... 5'10 170
Oh, there'll be photos of themselves, all posed in the same way and always with the same smiles, straight off the factory line.

I let people enjoy what they want, I swear, but rote instagram portraits are as bland as wet newspaper.
Blog posts without a date are a scourge.
They will get other jobs. The competing helps to efficiently allocate capital.

There's a reason for struggling artists: nobody demands their product, so they end up in different occupations that actually provide value.
It really depends upon the community college and class.

You tend to have some younger screw-up, unmotivated students, especially at entry level classes; some younger students that are there for economic or other reasons; some older students going back to school for life reasons; and then some older students who are intellectually curious and doing it for enrichment.

What the make-up of a class, and the resultant culture is, is a crapshoot. But it can be outstanding.
Good to know TED, also, has taken up the mantle of culture war nonsense.
Cool. Now, how are you going to report CSAM to NCMEC, or human trafficking to law enforcement as per Sesta-Fosta?

And then how are you going to ensure you don't provide content rabbit holes that can be harmful to mental health. Then detect credible cases of people threatening suicide to get a welfare check run.

That's just one of the things you don't see on the surface, there are hundreds more functions like that, that you'll very quickly realise you need to do so you don't get fined out of existence and/or end up with execs going to jail.
I think I get it perfectly fine. We just seem to disagree on the necessity and the viable alternative (two USB-C).
> I can't get a single dedicated language instructor for my life nowadays, it's bullshit apps or stuff oriented towards children only. Same if I wanted to learn the basics of, say, a performance art, or painting. The best system I have nowadays for learning is mostly hacker spaces and maker spaces, but they're specialized in what they can teach me and don't often have the kind of dedicated experts "office hours" or anything like that.

Exactly. I'm fairly knowledgeable about my STEM specialization but in university I had access to great language learning and exchange programs, top-notch political science and philosophy departments, architecture departments, etc. I remember bumming around in philosophy seminars not because I was a philosophy student (though I did take some philosophy classes) but because I found it so interesting. As long as I didn't increase the grading burden on any of the grad students/professors, everyone was happy and the quality of instruction I received was fantastic. In the real world the closest I have is books I read or MOOCs where a lot of people are in it to get a certification or a badge of completion rather than just marinate in ideas.
I don't find the talk novel, interesting or insightful, as it's a boring claim about an obviously ideal situation would be good in an ideal world, but that doesn't make it below TED's normal standards.

The mentioned debate on the topic could be good, but I didn't see a link to it.
Luckily the Uiua language creator stepped in to help us out :)
The complaint is collecting data on others. Specifically the complaint is on others collecting data on me.
> So the market decided they were not what was wanted.

No, the competition decided what they wanted, by using shady-as-shit (as well as out right illegal) tactics to squash everyone else.

People _loved_ their Amigas, STs, Be boxes, etc. They loved them so much that there are still some nutjobs out there trying to keep Amiga alive! Do you think there'd be that kind of devotion for Windows 40 years later, if it died around 3.1?

No, the users didn't choose. A loose hand on monopoly law did.
>As soon as he heard the world “Black@TED”— the “Employee Resource Group that exists to provide a safe space for TED staff who identify as Black” Colman recognized that he was f*cked.
Exercise-mimicking drug sheds weight, boosts muscle activity in mice
Y Combinator's Summer 2023 Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Trust Startups
> because we pushed ahead without considering whole-system complexity

No, because we didn't know better. My argument was: how long do we wait til we decide we know better? Do we stop everything? How long is long enough?

You're talking as though right now many things we think are the best thing to do won't turn out to be a terrible idea. They will be, because there is no way to consider "whole-system complexity" on a long enough time period to do things completely safely, or even to do anything at all, as anything might turn out to be a bad idea on a long enough timescale.
And that's just the start. They openly advocate for nuking western nations. Imagine if Anderson Cooper spent tens of minutes ranting about how we should just nuke Russia and China because fuck them
It's not moving the goalposts because "apps banned by the government" are not apps that will be available through side loading. If Apple complies with the DMA, it will certainly comply with any government requirement that side loading not allow for certain apps to be installed.
Numerical claim with no evidence. Thanks, OP.
Yep. Came to say pretty much the same thing -- and to add that I find the author's misuse of a medical term like "color blindness" disingenous.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_blindness is not the same as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_color_blindness

Sigh.

---

To the moderators: Please consider changing the title to "Why Is TED Scared of Racial Color Blindness?"
"In Time" (movie) would be the more likely outcome: time-to-live is transferrable currency.

But in the real world people already die at a predictable age - we are all statistics.
Assuming any image or audio stream is available on the internet (not true but very close), you can have a super large compression by replacing the media by their url.

LLM's (the set of connections and their weights) are in fact a compressed version of a large part of the internet.

So what is found by the article should not surprise.
What stops the population from engineering fertility back in gmo seeds?
it's the Earth vibrating ...
LLaMa 2 is sadly not open source and not open science, despite what Facebook keeps on claiming:

https://blog.opensource.org/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-ope...

Thus you will have to read the license and judge whether it is compatible with your business or use cases.

One should give them credit for making it available, which is a lot better than plenty of others. However, actually open models are starting to appear, so perhaps we will soon see Facebook and the likes making theirs open as well? Who knows.
Amazon only controls their market. You play by their rules if you sell with them, and that is totally valid. You can sell your product for any price you want so long as you don't use Amazon or don't undercut them if you choose to use them.

That is totally valid. Amazon provides the eyes; they don't want to provide a service for free. Think of all the people that go to best buy to feel a product and then buy it online. Amazon doesn't want that to happen to them.
Will be very _very_ interesting to see if the tech develops enough in my lifetime to where people can send in spit samples to a medical firm, have their genome processed and then the medical company can remove any genetic predispositions to certain defects, etc... You could then also (for a hefty price), choose to have different traits embedded in your embryo - different eye colors, hair types, jawline, etc.

I'm sure we'll eventually get to the point where you can go to a medical company, throw your spit into a machine and be able to check on/off boxes for desired traits, remove negative traits, etc. etc. and have a baby ready for you under accelerated growth in weeks, not months. For added comedy, have it delivered by drone - instead of a stork delivering your child, it could be Amazon!
Tell it to the judge.
Do you play Factorio? I’m not sure how much of that is actually feasible.
Its just an excuse to avoid admitting that it was a failure. In the next paragraph it says:

> The company made the decision that building up ARES would take “significant” investment and it couldn’t continue to fund those efforts.

Well, which is it? Is it so trivial that anyone can compete, or is it too costly to build it?
Interesting conclusion here is that the best way to put scammers out of business is to actually reply to those spam emails, engage in the conversation with them, the longer the better.

I wonder if Google could add a Bard chatbot to Gmail for this specific purpose :)

EDIT: on second thought, what if scammers themselves can use AI to manage all communications with potential victims? Will spam turn into AI war? each side trying to determine if they are talking to a real person or to a bot?
Fun fact: I used to work for a company that provided equipment and services for satcom. The price tier and license for airborne communication was higher and we had software calculating the speed and if the speed went over 300 m/hr or alike it will check your license features and expiration date. If you forgot to pay your bill, no wifi for ya! We did not use altitude for obvious reasons.
No way to tell for sure, but I can only assume that he had actually hijacked somebody else's connection and the other person's device stopped working for them. I sure wasn't going to stand up and ask the plane if anybody had had their internet plan hacked...
Is marketing a good example? I feel like the whole point of marketing is to generate revenue for the business, albeit indirectly.

Maintenance on your building, IT infrastructure, etc. are more of what I think of. The "cost of doing business".

Basically, things you need to have for the business to function but spending more on them won't generate you more revenue, sales, etc.
CSS Subgrid
Why does this matter if most of the money is going to the sports program and tuition remains unaffordable?
"integrates UI, business logic, and storage"

There are solid reasons why we don't do this. Just to name one: a single database table rarely holds the information you need, and is even less likely in the way you want the user to see it.
So what if it's ugly? Is this a serialization format or paintbrush?

Also, I think TOML stdlib gets to the heart of what I've been arguing. People who like syntactic whitespace like YAML. Everyone else (like C devs) don't. It makes quite a bit of sense to me that C devs don't want to touch YAML with a 10-ft pole.
Soon they will request you your SSN to login
>Trying to argue that specific academic studies causes tuition increases by making students mistrustful of government, but only several decades later, needs a lot of evidence for that kind of claim.

Right-leaning politicians are citing "grievance studies" as their reason for not liking universities, so the only stretch in this hypothesis is to think it might have been happening for decades before bubbling to the surface. It's not that it makes students distrustful of the government, it's that it makes politicians ask, "why are we paying them if they're going to make our goals harder to achieve?" I would not be surprised if the protests against the Vietnam war turned the inner view that many held about university faculty, but few expressed it because of the esteem the public held them in at the time.
Yeah, deep links are essential. Datadog's really good at this. They also have a nice preview generator so that when you drop that link into Slack it generates a preview image of the dashboard with all of the filters applied. It's great.
Another good, free option is chrome remote desktop:
https://remotedesktop.google.com/
Your point about sour grapes is well taken; indeed I think about 50% of human brainpower is used to rationalize why the choices we have already made (or are likely to make in the future) can't be wrong.

> And so "being on the same wavelength" goes both ways. Although, if you find that you are always requiring others to always be on your wavelength and you are never willing to match theirs, that might be another thing to self-reflect on.

Very true. I'll give an analogy: I really don't like the game Ticket to Ride. If I'm going to a weekly game group I'll sometimes play Ticket to Ride because playing games are a social activity, which requires compromise. However if the group is playing Ticket to Ride a majority of the time, we are all happier if I just find a different gaming group.
It was probably fairly precise already. To get their license, a private pilot must demonstrate via a checkride the ability to stay within 100 feet of an assigned altitude, even in a steep turn.
Just use gron!
My bank is doing some security theater fingerprinting (instead of something actually secure, like 2FA, but that's a different story), which in the end means I can't login to my bank account using Firefox anymore these days.
It's not about what you know, it's about who you know.
> That said, I'm curious what risks you have in mind.

Overzealous prosecutors.
“good artists borrow, great artists steal.” - Pablo Picasso

“You believe stealing is wrong, but if your family was starving and could not afford bread, wouldn’t you say it’s okay to steal a loaf to feed them?” - A.J. Darkholme

etc.

The basis of a morality may start with a simple set of propositions. Life ensures that the unknown unknowns that you encounter morphs them into an ever-evolving ruleset.
I added flight status on airlines I fly into my shell prompt from the wifi status. It’s surprisingly fun. https://x.com/mitsuhiko/status/866601971565944832?s=46&t=xvV...
These ideas are very much reflected in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.

What enters your mind and goes through a function of complete rational cognition- cannot be the ultimate truth.

And we repeatedly see in Zen koans, also mentioned in GEB, and life and teachings of Buddha that all questions cannot be purely answered with mere words.

Tractatus, Godel's Incompleteness, Halting problem, and these all somehow talk about the same unknowability- or at least intellectually.
Excel has had version control for years, via 365.

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/view-previous-ver...
Yea this is my question too I feel like they could bring in an expert and graft the pieces back
The Raspberry Pi 4 has been upgraded to run at the same speed as the 400, from 1.5GHz to 1.8GHz https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/...
That's not how it works. LLMs were only trained on text, so this is new data it's never seen before. There's no train-test leakage.
I admire Chomsky but I'm afraid this particular argument isn't very convincing. He merely asserts his position but does nothing (substantial) to defend his position. In what way is moral relativism a logical contradiction?

"...even if you’re the most extreme cultural relativist, you are presupposing universal moral values. Those can be discovered.”

That's not true at all. I don't presuppose universal moral values. And if I do, they can still be compatible with a relativistic description. (e.g. I can say they're relative to my current understanding, or relative to our collective shared understanding).

And as a linguist, he himself should know best that language usage here matters. What do we mean by "discovered" or "universal moral values" anyway. Clear all that up first before trying to eliminate moral relativism with a broad brush.
That’s what I assumed but thought to be a little silly. Sure people-hours instead of man-hours and spouses instead of wives but neither of those are bad enough to make a comparison with how imbalanced things were in the 60s.

I don’t believe the original article was really a call out to the wife’s duty. Replace it with spouse and it seems reasonable enough. Too many unknowns to do a double take.
Why is a no code dev easier to replace than a code dev?
Tool for monitoring uptime with web graphs
Jacques Marie Mage are very nice, I'm also a fan of Matsuda.
Makes me think, "Theory only takes you so far"

Or in 2020s slang, "Touch grass"
This sounds like an incredibly easy problem to solve if some people felt like solving it. I imagine that it's some administrators near the top that would block anyone from saying "let's have no-one publish to Elsevier any more" because John from Elsevier takes them on such lovely days out in bespoke locations, staying in boutique hotels.
I personally like Angus Graham's translation, Chuang-tzu: The Seven Inner Chapters and Other Writings from the Book Chuang-tzu, as well as his essays on it, A Companion to Angus C. Graham’s Chuang Tzu.

For one thing, it gave me some significant sympathy for analytic philosophy for the first time.
It's just a theorem prover.

Like every theorem prover it has a logic that you use for stating propositions, and proving theorem. The logic is a specific logic that is closely related to HoTT.
The idea of moral progress implies that there is objective morality, and that we can improve our knowledge of it. Progress implies a destination, it implies a standard against which the progress is measured, at least in principle.
> Is it really startups eating their lunch???

It's not really just startups - honestly I think 99% of those startups will fail.

The problem with generative AI as a business is basically what that leaked Google memo said, which was something along the lines of: "OpenAI doesn't really have a moat, but neither do we."

There are a few large companies who are creating these successful models (OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Meta, perhaps Amazon with their Anthropic investment), but there are tons of other startups that are trying to come up with "individual products around AI", and I think it will be incredibly hard for them to differentiate. That is, for a lot of the "dedicated" early-stage products I've seen, I've thought "I can pretty much do this all with ChatGPT, maybe ChatGPT with plugins - why would I want to download your special app?"

I don't think all of these companies are doomed to fail (for example, I think Harvey AI was smart to focus on a very specific, profitable niche: lawyers have a lot of money to spend on this stuff, and they have specific needs e.g. around compliance, auditability, privacy, etc. that you could see a specific legal-focused AI tool addressing), but I think a lot of them are.
I'll just note that if modern bioethics precautionary principles were applied in the 1970s, we would probably never have gotten human IVF treatments — nobody would have ever gotten the green-light to try it on a person.

As someone who has a family because of IVF, I am very thankful that researchers were allowed to roll the dice on that one, and see that it turned out well.
Found the CEO
Actually, category theory, type theory, and proof theory.
Sorry about that! Docs are fixed now.

(Other cofounder of Fluxon)
Considering Japan has a huge birth rate collapse problem, it doesn't surprise me that they are leading the way for test tube babies.
Aside from my own personal issues with that chart, two big differences:
- we're vetting the journalist, so this can include the ever growing number of freelancers/independents and many smaller outlets that would never make it onto a chart like that; and the delivery mechanism.

We are pulling in reporters who work for all sorts of outlets, from small local newspapers to national TV networks, across various types of media, beats/verticals, and locations. We want to be "around the block and around the world," covering local stories across the US and major national/world issues.

Like social media, users can self-curate, to see everything in one place, based on their own interests. For a casual news consumer, you don't need to go to 20 different websites to see headlines.
Thanks! This looks great! I like the local first (or local only) approach of your tool. It's very refreshing in comparison to the bloated monsters like campfire or postman
A YouTube search for "a case for color blindness debate" shows this as the 2nd result: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNo8en2iJAc