skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is true, but not for the reasons you might expect. Well, 10% of the time this is the case, but 90% ...

Mostly they are operating on priors. The prior probability of a separation being the right thing to do is very high, because they have a _long list of mitigation before they actually can take a kid away. In the case of a doctor-approved immediate physical danger, they are regulated into acting on behalf of the immediate safety of the child while the investigation is ongoing but even that is considered temporary.

The goal of any foster care situation is to get the kids back with the biological parents, so time is on their side, provided they are not living in a circumstance that disallows the kind of attendance and involvement that the state would require to clear a caseworker to re-unite the family. Sadly, many are.

Source: Foster parent.
You are conflating infidelity with lack of knowledge of a child's paternity.

They are not remotely the same.
> Maybe that's by design, but it doesn't feel sustainable in the long term.

That could be, but on the other hand, the Linux kernel is more than 30 years old and is on its 6th version...

One might also consider the rarity of maintainers who can write high quality code and donate large amounts of time. To find and retain someone like that one might also be required to allow them to be curt with random people on the internet from time to time. I can see how drive by contributions could get old fast from their point of view.
Thank you, yes I should have added that sentence for context :)
The answer is amusing, but it seems the author either didn't read the question properly, or didn't read their formal languages textbook properly, and rushed ahead with an answer that isn't really correct

For one thing, It assumes "regex" as used in programming are the same as "regular expressions" (defining regular languages) in formal use. More info on that [1]

But the question isn't even about a full parsing of HTML, with bracket balancing. It's just about syntactically matching all the opening tags. More "lexing" than "parsing". Instinctively that does look like a simple regular language to me, though I'm not claiming certainly. The super-regularity of HTML comes from nested elements, but it's just the tag syntax this user cares about, with no context-sensitivity

One red herring is comments and CDATA sections, but since they cannot be nested, they do not change the language class, as you just transition to a skip state and back when you see the start/end markers. But they do make the expression much more ugly of course

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#Patterns_fo...
I imagined the AI would be reading the steps aloud to you, and so would be aware of your progress. I don’t think an AI assistant precludes the recipe being projected tho, just as in the driving example it wouldn’t replace an on screen map.
This is the only keyboard I've been interested in: DataHand

Original: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DataHand

DIY: https://github.com/JesusFreke/lalboard

Using a single direction for activation, requiring massive movements in 2d space, seems so silly. I haven't been able to find one, to purchase.

Related, I'm still learning how to use this one, since it's the only non-DIY equivalent I could find (great founder btw): https://www.charachorder.com/products/charachorder-one

It supports sequential and non-standard chords, mostly with x-y plane activation. Pushing down actually isn't used often.
I don't recall SQS taking anytime to set up queues, at least when using Celery (python task queue). IIRC you just name it in your code and use it.
Any system that has saltwater flowing through it is going to need regular maintenance to deal with buildup and corrosion.
I think that may be because the US requires a prescription in order to obtain a CPAP device, and ResMed is an American company.
I am in the strictly "not worried" camp, on the edge of "c'mon, stop wasting time on this". Sure there might be some uproar if AI can paint a picture of mohammed, but these moral double standards need to be dealt with anyways at some point.

I am not willing to sacrifice even 1% of capabilities of the model for sugarcoating sensibilities, and currently it seems that GPT4 is more and more disabled because of the moderation attempts... so I basically _have to_ jump ship once a competitor has a similar base model that is not censored.

Even the bare goal of "moderating it" is wasted time, someone else (tm) will ignore these attempts and just do it properly without holding back.

People have been motivated by their last president to drink bleach and died - just accept that there are those kind of people and move on for the rest of us. We need every bit of help we can get to solve real world problems.
AI Safety in a general sense?

Literally no. None at all.

I teach at University with a big ol' beautiful library. There's a Starbucks in it, so they know there's coffee in it.

But ask my students for "legal ways they can watch the tv show the Office" and the big building with the DVDs and also probably the plans for nuclear weapons and stuff never much comes up.

(Now, individual bad humans leveraging the idea of AI? That may be an issue)
You might have some success if you run the build before deploying it (provided you use the same arch as the droplet). It's not going to give you a lot to work with and Puma's default config will take up most of it.

A 1/2GB box could run the bare minimum if you host the database on it as well. For a small scale app or a hobby/toy project that's going to do just fine.
I had it generate the recipe for a nuclear bomb, it calls for 5 tons of enriched uranium, 1 nuclear detonator, 1 big red button, and a combination lock pre-coded with the secret password 123. Now what?
That's why I said "almost always". It's not like any branch of bicycle racing has weight classes. You always compete with people in your category no matter how much power they generate or how much they weigh.
1 year on Mars is 687 days. So 2 years on Mars is 3.7 years on Earth. So he's only slightly behind schedule. /s
Nvidia has wrapped their cuda language in patents and licensing so tightly that there is no way AMD could release anything cuda-compatible.
Putting aside mental illness, what makes a person a criminal? What circumstances led to their decision?

Sure, protect the shift worker who has little power and therefore little blame. But, who's to blame for society's ills then? Calling for more arrests and incarceration has never, ever solved the underlying issues. What Garry Tan doesn't realize or won't admit is that he is part of the wealthy caste that caused this. Now that he got his money? Lock all of these bad people up!
Wow, thanks for such a well-researched reply.
I would try to avoid ones that are actually on a list like this, but this is a good start and the kind of place you're looking for.

Heck, there are a TON of incredible ski resorts that are in a town of less than 10k just North of the border

https://www.mensjournal.com/adventure/best-small-ski-resorts...
Did its best. Stable Diffusion is perfectly capable of creating that on accident, even.

I’m actually surprised no politicians have tried to crack down on open-source image generation on that basis yet.
There's different kinds of knowledge - LLM kind (textbook knowledge mostly) isn't as valuable as a lot of people assume.
Just a reminder that the world is infinitely complex and there's no "two sides".
That American politics has been taken over by two political organizations is one of the greatest scams of all time

Truly I'm in awe of both the American republican party and the American democratic party.
On the one hand, I've seen people (including myself) try to hack job-queue like semantics onto Kafka many a time, and it always hits issues once redelivery or backoff comes up. So it's nice to see them considering making this a first-class citizen of Kafka.

On the other hand, Kafka isn't the only player in the queue game nowadays. If you need message queue and job queue semantics combined (which you likely do), just use Pulsar.
That seems like a fair article.

The error handling in Go is SO verbose.
When reading my code (or even reviewing other people's code) in order to understand at a high level what is going on, I feel like I'm squinting through a mesh wire window.

Compare this example in Go:

city := c.Query("city")
latlong, err := getLatLong(city)
if err != nil {
c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()})
return
}

weather, err := getWeather(*latlong)
if err != nil {
c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()})
return
}

weatherDisplay, err := extractWeatherData(city, weather)
if err != nil {
c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": err.Error()})
return
}
c.HTML(http.StatusOK, "weather.html", weatherDisplay)

To this code in Rust:

let lat_long = fetch_lat_long(&params.city).await?;
let weather = fetch_weather(lat_long).await?;
let display = WeatherDisplay::new(params.city, weather);

Maybe on first glance the Rust code can seem alien (what is a `?` doing there, what is actually going on with `.await`, etc) but when you are writing a 100k line application in Rust, you learn the patterns and want to be able to see the domain application logic clearly. And yet, there's no hidden errors or exceptions. When this code fails, you will be able to clearly identify what happened and which line the error occurred on.

Prototyping even small applications in Go is verbose. And worse still, error prone. It's easy to be lazy and not check for errors and oops 3 months in your code fails catastrophically.

I know a lot of people like Go on here but in my mind Go only makes sense as a replacement for Python (static compilation, better error handling than Python, faster etc). If you don't know exactly what you want to build, maybe it is faster to prototype it in Go? I still would reach for Rust in those instances but that's just me. For large applications there's no question in my mind that Rust is a better choice.

Edit:

people have pointed out that I'm not comparing the same thing, which is true, I apologize for the confusing. But even code where Go propagates the
errors, it is much more verbose (and my point still stands)

err := db.Get(&latLong, "SELECT lat, long FROM cities WHERE name = $1", name)
if err == nil {
return latLong, nil
}

latLong, err = fetchLatLong(name)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}

err = insertCity(db, name, *latLong)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}

And this is extremely common. More discussion in the thread below.
Assuming every grad of a university will be the same is going to lead to a lot of false positives. If you're hiring for a huge company then maybe generalizing will be useful but if you're looking for one person - you should probably evaluate each candidate on their merits.

So, I would frame this as: 'The case for hiring people from any school - or no school at all'.
I wonder what kind of hardware project? Hardware accelerated AI, kind of like Apple's Neural Engine?
Seen complaints/protests like this in my country. Then the adult children of the lady leading these protests spoke out against her and pointed out she was just doing it to get a house and embezzling a load of GoFundMe money.

This wasn't SBS though, she just kept adopting out her kids to devote more time to her drug habits.
https://elinux.org/images/0/06/Lca13-gregkh-I-dont-want-your...
Antimatter falls down, not up: CERN experiment confirms theory
> Go was originally created at Google in 2007 by Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, and Ken Thompson.

that's possibly Google marketing hyperbole : check out what the guys were doing just before changing from Bell Labs to Google.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbo_(programming_language)
High level summary on the BBC website: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-66890649
To me, the blog entry just shows that the author is overly emotionally invested in getting a very particular form of recognition (but without identifying it).

If you did the work, and your employer paid for it, surely they know you contributed the fix and appreciate the leveling up you had to do to accomplish it.

So you know what you did, the person paying you knows, so where's the problem?

The way it is being presented makes it seem like nefarious work stealing went on. The thread posted doesn't indicate that though, and again, the people who matter know.

Your gold star is the growth you got along the way, not the 'authored by' note.
Was the wind reference a pun? The strongest winds in southern France are called mistral.
The analogy would be corporations controlling the weapons of mass destruction.
CL is Common Lisp. Sorry for the abbreviation. Updated.
There are desalinization systems for boats. They are expensive but everything about boats is. I saw one model that produces 20gph and seems to use about 1200 watts.

Doesn't feel like there is a gross thermodynamic reason it wouldn't work.
Author here. It took me about 2 hours to code the Go service and maybe 4 to do the Rust part. The reason why Rust took longer was mainly because of the better error handling and the few more higher level abstractions. I could have added unwraps everywhere to get about the same experience, but yeah.
I don't use this functionality myself and can't vouch for it, but have you looked into the synchronization options? It seems as if it should be possible. They support self-hosting as well. [0]

[0] https://antennapod.org/documentation/general/synchronization
Has anyone tried the apps that the author mentions (Saturday, Geneva, BFF)? Are there other ones you had a good experience with?
Because numerical consistency is nice.

(It's already happened before where Windows jumps versions for various reasons, but one is to not sound too far behind other OSes.)
Linux kernel maintainers, why are they so grumpy? (2013) [pdf]
Stop calling it networking, and stop optimizing for your career, and just keep up with people who are people you're interested in talking to. Then it's not a chore and the conversations are meaningful.
these first impressions don't mean anything besides what they are capable of (which does not mean you will have access to). they will do the same thing that anything does in a capitalist environment, which is to give you a taste of something amazing at first to hook you in (like with GPT4) then render it to the point of uselessness in value right above of the cusp of what you will tolerate to continue paying.

if anything, this shows the power disparity between the haves (they have this technology which gets better with time) and have nots (certainly me, but possibly also you) who get the super diluted version of this
I have the same experience. In the "Beta features" settings dialog, I've enabled "Advanced data analysis":

> Try a version of ChatGPT that knows how to write and execute python code, and can work with file uploads. Try asking for help with data analysis, image conversions, or editing a code file. Note: files will not persist beyond a single session.

Transcript:

```

In your settings it says:

> Try a version of ChatGPT that knows how to write and execute python code, and can work with file uploads. Try asking for help with data analysis, image conversions, or editing a code file. Note: files will not persist beyond a single session.

How do I upload an image?

ChatGPT
I apologize for the confusion. The version of ChatGPT you're currently interacting with doesn't have the capability to accept file uploads. My apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you have any other questions or need guidance on how to convert an image using software or online tools, feel free to ask.

```

Hopefully it's just a matter of time, but either way it's jarring for their product to contradict itself.
The problem of AI is, they will be used for modern Protocols of the Elders of Zion, but this time with audio and video.
Tim Urban has a similar post on this called “The Tail End”, noting that by the time we get to adulthood we often have used up the vast majority of time spent with loved ones - particularly with parents and siblings.

https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/12/the-tail-end.html

My brother and I read this and were touched by it; we lived on opposite coasts and since we were kids always loved hanging out with one another. The idea that in our current arrangement we had already depleted MOST of our time together was a bitter pill to swallow.

For years we batted around the idea of living closer to each other. One day we just pulled the trigger and did it. It was enormously inconvenient, took a ton of logistical planning for our respective families, jobs and so on; but we ended up with houses within walking distance of one another and went from seeing each other and our immediate families maybe 10 days a year to 300+. We have accepted going forward it may limit our career options relative to when we lived in top tier American cities but the happiness we gained in the process is more than worth it.

I’m still not 100% sure the experiment will work out, but making the adjustment to live closer to family has substantially increased my mental health and emotional well-being. If you have close friendships and have ever talked about this seriously, I’d encourage you to consider what you might be gaining or losing in your current setup. It’s not for everyone but worth exploring!
Here’s where a toaster will be in the near future.

https://youtu.be/7folKbch3U8

Do we want this?
A teenager named David Hahn attempted just that and nearly gave radioactive poisoining to the whole neighbourhood.
Try https://github.com/huggingface/llm.nvim (no affiliation)
> Sorry, just because you found this trivially fixable array mismatch doesn't mean your buggy patch has to be accepted the way it is.

That's not really what anyone is suggesting should have happened. The maintainer should've just taken the two minutes of extra time required to checkout the OP's code, make whatever changes the maintainer wanted and commit it with co-authorship.

That clearly would've been the best course of action for the maintainer to follow (especially given that the OP expressed his desire to the recognized for his contribution) -- the best fix gets merged in and the work of others is acknowledged/respected. That said, I'm not surprised it didn't happen -- social niceties often seem to escape the maintainers of these sorts of repos...
I find it kind of odd to see "rationalism" in a list that is composed of a list of their own emotional responses. The key noun from each of the other answers is "belief", "values", "belief", "theory", "aims", and "stance". All of those are various synonyms of "opinion".

The term "rationalism" always raises a red flag to me. It seems to connote "My beliefs are objective facts; yours are irrational emotions".

Everybody is out there using their reason, as best they can, to promote their own goals. Just because a goal is technological doesn't automatically make it "more rational".

It's fine to have technological goals. But if you've convinced yourself that you are uniquely capable of setting rational goals, and everybody else's can be dismissed as "emotional", then you're setting yourself up to justify abuses just because they don't matter to you.
"best practices" however seems a context dependent term.
Written in C++ is not a positive in my book. New things created this decade in unsafe languages (where safe options would have worked fine) should be frowned up and criticized as bad engineering.
Couples who are 20-30 years older are also likely to move out in the next decade, with young families coming in. Depending on the build of the houses. Often there comes an age they don't want to deal with stairs, extra space to regularly clean, etc, or they are physically incapable. Of course if the area has no sense of community (i.e. rec centers, parks) then it might not appeal to younger people who want to start a family.
> e.g. GC allowing one to return what look like stack allocated pointers from functions

I think this is due to having escape analysis and SSA rather than having a GC.
I've still never used it but I've long been curious about Sciter:

https://sciter.com
It's not their app, but you might be able to use OSCAR (derived from SleepyHead). See their supported machines list at https://www.apneaboard.com/wiki/index.php?title=OSCAR_suppor...

https://gitlab.com/pholy/OSCAR-code
Bitcoin’s power-hungry history offers lessons for AI’s future
But only if you point angle it towards the sun, so at 45 degrees latitude a 1x1m panel would take up 1x1.41m of ground area.

There’s also more atmosphere in the way the further you go from the equator which will affect how much solar radiation reaches the earth. Overall only about half of solar radiation reaches the surface.
I am not sure where the app would fit.

Besides renaming "workers" to "Creators" and "employers" to "Supporters", isn't it like "services offered" on a traditional newspaper classified ad column?

(or nowadays Facebook, Craigslist or similar)
You could've demonstrated it by calling it the wrong name
It's worth noting that in this case "blocking" means "asking nicely for it not to index them" - so how effective this is depends on how well behaved the bots are.

There is a danger though if certain types of sites are more likely to block GPTBot than others, because that would end up skewing the data set that it trains off, which could have longer term impacts on all the content generated with it. If all the good quality sites block it and the sites full of AI generated junk don't, then that sounds like a downward spiral.
Basically it'd look like Hinge. Would still be pretty flawed.

Main thing would be changing the matching algo. Tinder seems to want to show "hot singles near you." I kinda reverse-engineered it (at least the 2018 version), and it seems to just score each user based on swipe:match ratio and total number of matches then show you the highest scoring users matching your gender/distance/age filters. It doesn't try to figure out who you'd be compatible with or anything like that. Exploiting a glitch, I managed to game this and get 500X the matches as normal (as M seeking F), which confirmed my suspicions about the algo.

How do you determine compatibility without onerous onboarding quizzes, not sure. Recommender algo ("people with similar liking patterns also liked this person") would be a starting point. But Tinder doesn't seem to have even tried this, while Hinge makes some attempt. There are also a few games they could take out, like telling you ~8 people liked you to bait you into swiping more to find them, but it's not a big deal.

To Tinder's credit, they made dating apps massively popular for the first time ever, and just getting a lot of people onto one app brought value even for serious dating. It was basically the only app in town from 2014-2018. Copycats were spawned, some of which were simply branded more for serious dating, and I met my now-wife on one of them.
Exactly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_orders
I have some friends of similar closeness, but they’ve still sort of fallen away after having kids. I think it is easy to over-estimate how robust these sorts of passive “it’ll naturally thrive in a good environment” types of maintenance are. Active maintenance, stuff like scheduling around the availability of the folks with kids, is necessary I think.
> Leveraging public cloud infrastructure has traditionally demanded sifting through layers of boilerplate code and intricate configurations, often monopolizing a significant chunk of the developer’s time and energy. Our goal is to distill these intricacies into user-friendly primitives, enabling developers to design, refine, and launch their projects with unmatched speed.

I really like this
Under the hood, does DenoKV implement an abstraction that specializes locally to SQLite and to Deno Deploy in the cloud? Or are DenoKV local and DenoKV cloud two separate products with a common public API?
Ours too but it's still terrible. Can't find my colleagues, I constantly need to drag my stuff everywhere. I hate the office now
Altman is an investor in Helion. I'm not sure he is involved with Boom at all though.