skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nothing wrong with being a married housewife. It’s callous to write with a connotation that suggests there is. In fact the best argument is that children need and should have their mother around as much as possible especially in their formative years. Children aren’t a status symbol or a car or a pet.
Why would a 16 year old be in a situation to need a chainsaw but not have anyone older to purchase it for them?
> you can have over a hundred different i2c devices connected to the same bus

In theory sure, in a world with zero-inductance zero-capacitance busses and infinite-sink-current drivers. In our reality, however, you'll start having issues and start requiring stronger pullups and lower speeds long before you get to a hundred.
Maybe not the departments directly, but the nonsense they push certainly does. e.g. University of Michigan has 163 full time DEI employees.
I did consider Electron but I was interested in learning SwiftUI and trying to figure out how to make it as lightweight as possible. I've done a bunch of react-native in the past and we always hit snags with memory pressure / performance so I wanted to try full native dev. Working in swift/native also leaves open the possibility of using llama.cpp directly rather than via server.cpp as I have it set up now. Might take a crack at an electron version if this one takes off for mac users though. Thanks for taking a look!

Here's a solid cross-platform one to check out if you're on windows or linux: https://gpt4all.io/index.html
University presses have less reach than a popular press, but the flip side of that is that they are willing to publish works only of interest to an academic audience. If you want to reach a wide audience, then, no, you don't want to publish in a university press. However if you want to publish a detailed study on a niche subject, no popular press will want to touch that. That's what the university presses are for. e.g., here's a title I came across at Princeton University Press, "A Velvet Empire: French Informal Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century." Just based on the title, there's no way some place like Penguin Random House is going to even look at that manuscript.

The same author may approach different publishers depending on their intended audience. e.g. Daron Acemoglu published "Introduction to Modern Economic Growth" with Princeton but "Why Nations Fail" with Crown (a division of Penguin RandomHouse).
Pardon my ignorance, but they use ML to find sperm and egg donors that match similar facial features to the “parents”? Cause that is honesty pretty cool.
I think the criticism of saying "we're not even thinking of a replacement" is fair, the standard dodge "we don't have anything to announce at this time" which is enough to avoid the Osborne Effect.
[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/writing-poems-using-llama-2-on-w...
Many websites still have limits on how many you can buy.

For a hobbyist / individual, is that really a big deal? I mean, how many do you need at one time?

Anyway, the claim all along has been that supplies would be "back to normal" by the end of this year, and so far things seem to be tracking that way. If you look at rpilocator.com now, the entire first two pages are full of green lines, which is a DRASTIC improvement compared to just 6 months ago. And some of the major distributors are getting in shipments of 5,000, 6,000 at a time of some models and having them in stock for weeks on end. So one can clearly see that the situation is improving rapidly.

That said, I will make no claim one way or the other with regards to the question of whether or not shipping a Pi 5 is a "good idea" or not.
All that has nothing to do with how you treat a talk after you selected and hosted it. Which is ultimately what this is about.
That still requires being exposed to the right people.
Quite honestly, I don't give a single fraction of a shit what the advertisers want. As someone with ADHD, I find their entire industry to be quite ableist towards myself and others for whom focus is fickle.
> I didn't recognize the name but figured he was the guy who came up with M-theory

As it so happens, he's also the guy behind this paper: "Searching for a Black Hole in the Outer Solar System", https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14192

:-)
I saw whisper recommended, but I was curious how it compares to the other robust ASR systems (like nvidia's Nemo + Riva). I found this Twitter thread that seemed relevant: https://nitter.net/lunixbochs/status/1574848899897884672

Long story short, it depends on what you want to use it for. Different models and different training sets can help optimize for different things. Also, if you're in a domain with very uncommon speech patterns (think doctor shorthand or radio lingo), you'll need to understand how difficult it will be to customize generated models to do better in your space. I think Nemo + Riva does well at this; but I'm not as familiar with other options.
I don't think running saltwater through a toilet is straightforward. You would need higher quality parts, more frequent valve maintenance, and downstream waste processing equipped to handle the salt.
Conference hotels often soak the companies with booths for internet access. One place I did for my company demanded $1500 for 3 days of internet access for up to 5 devices.

In-room, you get free internet access, but in the windowless ballroom with spotty cell-service, there's nothing available for free.
That doesn't fit the bill:

> Output voltage (four charging modes): PDO DC5.0V-3.0A or 9.0V-2.77A
PPS 3.3-5.9V-3A or 3.3-11.0V-2.24A

5V output at 5A is pretty unusual.
"Always minimized crimes against humanity in one direction". You haven't read much Chomsky have you? The one key point that comes across from his thinking is how much we (westerners) minimize our crimes even when they are comparable or larger then the enemy. His whole manufacturing consent book is about such examples.

And that if you criticize someone it better be your own side, where you at least have a slight chance of changing something even if democracy is a thin veneer over something shady, rather than bravely criticising totalitary regimes where your chance of having an impact is really negligible. Just like if you have kids you'd better make sure you correct their faults instead of gossiping about the neighbours' kid's mischiefs.

Chomsky and his cohort was criticizing the Vietnam war at a time it was very unpopular to do so at home, today you get western people criticizing Putin and Xi as if this was some act of bravery and not the pointless navel grazing that it is in fact.

Until the West has a shitty foreign policy, and increasingly shitty domestic one as well (see surveillance, making terrorists of activists or journalists) totalitarian regimes can use this a valid excuse to shake off any criticism on their part.
All of what you said is true.

Yes: compensation is needed to account for non rectangular sampling (see the Polar reformat or the Stolt interpolator). Yes: non-straight and level flight paths result in degraded or even useless imagery unless the deviation is small or the FFT-based algorithm is specifically tweaked for it. Yes: various algorithms make assumptions that may be violated (e.g., planar wavefronts).

But again, I think it’s just the computational efficiency of the FFT-based algorithms for real-time use.

As a random thought, a lot of radar engineers that don’t start with SAR are perfectly comfortable reasoning about Doppler. Particularly with regard to detection of moving targets. Maybe that’s a factor, too.
It’s not that hard, YAML is disappointingly and unfortunately, unnecessarily, extremely ambiguous, which is exactly what you do not want in the contexts where it’s dominant.

The solution is uncannily simple tho, fuck YAML, just generate it from Dhall; enjoy the subsequent bliss!
That's an amazing anecdote!

The state of "open Wi-Fi" security is actually really sad. I'm not aware of an easy way for the airline to actually do better than this!

I suppose they could use Opportunistic Wireless Encryption [1] and bind session authentication to that (i.e. authenticate a given OWE session, not a given MAC address) if the device supports it, as at least modern Apple devices do? But I have no idea how stable an OWE session is; it would be very inconvenient to have to login again every time my device switches between access points.

In any case, I'm sad that this isn't a solved problem yet, and paid Wi-Fi (as well as securing free Wi-Fi) still requires custom and clunky solutions like unreliable captive portals that need to pass through selective traffic (e.g. for 3DS, for payments, sometimes emails for password reset codes etc and more).

A standardized endpoint and API would also be nice, i.e. something to tell the client whether it's connected, restricted (i.e. able to only access a limited set of hosts such as the in-flight map as described in the article), or needs to pay/authenticate (and if so, at which URL). This could then yield an authentication token, to be provided for seamless reconnections for the same session.

There's "Hotspot 2.0" and WPA-EAP (i.e. WPA Enterprise), but these don't really have a good story for "pay via web portal" style usages and are more geared towards wireless carrier operated hotspot networks and corporate scenarios, respectively.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunistic_Wireless_Encrypt...
Sitting all day increases dementia risk – even if you exercise
Maybe you can take risks like that, but I certainly can’t. I don’t think anyone with my name or skin color would be given the benefit of the doubt for even a moment.
Control for inflation and look at the chart again, and those numbers are after layoffs.
At it's face, yea, it sounds fair, and the more data you feed to the actuarial tables, the more accurately they can identify the specific cost of insuring that driver.

My concern is that it's a tragedy of the commons type situation: this normalizes data surveillance. We have no idea exactly what data the device is transmitting, and what the insurance company will do with that data. Regulations protecting this data are weak-to-non existent.

With everyone's budget being stressed, people are quick to trade a few dollars to sacrifice privacy, and then this technology is being mandated everywhere.
More censorship, I guess.
I didn't understand first either. I first discovered these playing around with Rancher which would use xip.io for the same thing.

The point is some protocols require you to actually resolve a domain name. For example, if you set up a vhost or reverse proxy with Apache or nginx, it will use the domain name to figure out what vhost you were trying to access. When you request a page like google.com the browser resolves that to an IP address, but it sends google.com with the request.

So say you have a reverse proxy at 1.2.3.4. You could make two vhosts: site1.1.2.3.4.backname.io and site2.1.2.3.4.backname.io and it would just work from any browser on your network.

You can do this locally using the hosts file before you set up your DNS for real, but a service like this means you don't even have to do that. Useful for quick experiments.
> I don't love the grounds of the electronic device search here but this was not random or arbitrary.

The way modern day totalitarianism (at all levels of it) works is operating through existing legal and bureaucratic systems to make your authoritarianism seem "legal and within reason."

It's so much easier to enrage people if you do something _completely randomly_, but if you put "oh this is legal" behind it, people calm down quite a bit.

Not to drag you in this, but your comment is an example of that. And ignoring the ego for a second here, I've definitely seen myself care "less" when something is legal if I wasn't paying attention to it.

Remember that this isn't really new. Sham courts, sham procedures, sham justice has been the cornerstone of every fascist, dictator, authoritarian in the past.

--

The rest of the comment isn't really relevant here, but I'm going to type it out just because someone might find it interesting.

We can see this type of "sham procedure" in social media moderation, in workplace behavior moderation, etc. Any person in power can, very easily, use rules, codes of conduct, policies, etc to control and set the tone of any interaction. Funnily enough, that power is usually reported as designed to protect the people with less power, but it's nearly always used to exert authority on people with less power.
I like my wives at home.
Not really, i think yaml have more capability, you can convert json to yaml 1:1, but the reverse isn't true.

But here is the issue: the errors caught in a json-validate won't be in a yaml-validate. If you have 15 inventory file to write per day, you will do a lot of copy pasta, sometimes with errors, and most of those times ansible won't resolve because the yaml was obviously false. The one time it wasn't, it was sadly on a critical part of our infra, and almost cost us a client (and definitely costed trust).

Yaml is way more permissive (because it has more capabilities). But we didn't care about map and semi-code or whatnot. If you need it, more power to you, it just wasn't our original usecase. So they wrote some perl json->yaml interpreter with restricted keywords, and after that, the misalignment risk was negated. Ultimately i arrived at the company, was told the story, then wrote stuff to convert excel->json, then SQL->json, and effectively in the end the extra conversion was unnecessary, and probably harder than just converting directly in yaml. I'm not saying yaml is worse than json, i think in 80% of cases, it's better. I'm just saying that in the rare cases where being correct is way more important than being fast, i'd use json.
This is great! You should expand this to be a full-fledged HN reader.
I think the perfect no-code tools has yet to appear.

Ideally, no-code tools should generate a good code (using LLM) into a git repo complete with the following:

- good code structure.

- test code.

- database migration code.

- CI/CD code.

- Docker packaging code.

- Basic Kubernetes/Helm code.

This way, an actual engineer can take it and roll with it if you stopped using the code generator platform.
A healthy mind in a healthy body. We should all aspire to it. It's a beautiful thing, to have institutions nurture both athletes and scholars.
The "No code"/"Low code" industry will always be "Inner-Platform Effect as a Service". They reflect whatever programming language they themselves were built in, but dumber, worse, and harder to program in.

The sweet spot is of course demos for PHBs. The allure of inner-platform effect in almost every case has always been that drive towards "we can save money by not hiring actual programmers". It is a delicious vision for business people that remains forever ironically unaware of the "law" that is a direct corollary for the inner-platform effect: any sufficiently advanced configuration is indistinguishable from programming.

The perceived "advantage" of "No Code"/"Low Code" is increased ability by companies to "move fast and break stuff" with process testing or data visualization or "one-off" tools.

The true "advantage" of "No Code"/"Low Code" tools is how well they shift tasks from senior developers to more junior developers and/or business users that want to try amateur/semi-pro programming without the requisite bump in salary. But if you are going to need a senior developer to come in and properly productionize it anyway how much are you really saving? How much are you instead over-expending on "ejection" and rework and rewrites that might have been avoided just going to more senior development staff in the first place? (How much of the senior developer anguish could be avoided by realizing that "move fast and break things" includes accidentally breaking senior developer morale every time they are handed some strange "Low Code" thing from business people playing amateur coding adventure hour and throw it over the wall with "we need it in production stat; it's mostly done so should only take a few hours, right?")
>If you assert that 'moral relativism is true' that itself would be a relative claim

no it wouldn't because meta-ethical statements express objectives claims about moral values, they are not themselves normative or moral claims.

It is equivalent to pointing out that everyone is a relativist in regards to their favorite flavor of ice cream. That statement is itself verifiably true or false.
http://web.archive.org/web/20230928191025/https://www.nytime...

https://archive.ph/dxVQ2
Heh, true. I deliberately left out altitude because this is HN but you caught me anyway.

Presumably a train's groundSpeed and airSpeed are the same. If they diverge you have bigger problems than a JSON schema.

Is there a variant of this for ships? surfaceSpeed vs seaFloorSpeed?
Nr of phones doesn't matter, nr of models matters. How many models have google launched? 8? Fairphone did 5, not that big difference. And apple how many? >15 generations with huge support. So here we have both a small company with big support, a big company with big support (and even samsung now provides more years of os updates lol) and here we have google, a big corp that "can't" do this bc they are big... suuuuuure
I’m not sure who the “we” is in your statement, “we do know with certainty that IVF is immoral”. As evidenced by the entire rest of the thread, this opinion is hotly contested. If you believe IVF is morally wrong, please at least explain why. As it stands, you’re simply condemning families and researchers as evil and holding future research to an arbitrarily high, nebulous ethical bar with no explanation.
Just to be clear, Simple Keyboard does not have autocorrect, right? Also, there seems to be two "Simple Keyboard" apps on Fdroid. I installed the one with the most recent update.
Be right back, I'm starting a new search engine, AAAAA A Best Searches
You might be interested in Ed Witten's paper about this exact problem:

"Searching for a Black Hole in the Outer Solar System", https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14192
> What if you could take your projects from 1 → n just like you would with Git? What worlds would it open for your development workflow if your infrastructure on Railway was fully versioned and reproducible?

> To implement Changesets, our team took inspiration from Git.

Putting things nicely, I don't think people love git for it's elegance. After all, it was conceived and developed as an alternative to proprietary VCS software. Presenting a proprietary solution as "Git for X" is a catch-22. Most people will see the "pricing" button and register that immediately; you're not making Git, but instead selling a service.

It's a bit off-topic, and I don't expect any direct response. It just burns me up when ad copy buries it's lede so far.
Because he's seen a ton of resumes that say Flutter experience, and when he digs in he sees that people have written a Hello World or tinkered with a few example pieces of code in a senior class project. Or they watched a Google I/O presentation on YouTube.

Asking how many years you've actually spent with a framework is a valid question, and you're going to get it again. So look inward. Do you really have 6 years of actual experience shipping apps with it? Or is it 2 or 3? Maybe one? Have you shipped at all?

And if you have shipped a Flutter app, pivot the conversation to that instead. Point out what you did. And then it doesn't matter how many years you did (or didn't) spend on it because you're giving the the interviewer what he is looking for. What's that Spolsky tag line? Smart and Gets Things Done(tm)
Xiaomi is the essence of Chinaware: Xiaomi are hard to open/repair (environmental unfriendly), workers don't get a fair wage, materials are not fairly resourced, it has a locked bootloader, they have their own bloatware (MIUI), probably contain spyware, and likely don't even pay fair taxes.

Also, the successor of Fairphone 4, Fairphone 5, has 5G and OLED.
Have you tried searching "chatgpt code generation"?

Many results

We talk about it in our Readme, under features > chat

> Combine LLM and Hof code gen for better, scalable results

https://github.com/hofstadter-io/hof
Make it a black hole but very big and the 2001 book gets even spookier
Which is a good thing. If it was bing, i would get a call from my parents every time they switched phones on how to change search to google.
Were they the same size upon founding as they are now? A few activists get their foot in the door, push to hire friendly administrators, who push for more activists, who push for more administrators… Eventually everything is taken over
Thought the original headline, "To Knock an Elephant Off Balance, Bring Out a Giant Blindfold", was a metaphor for taking down industry giants.

Nope. Just a how-to guide for making pachyderms horizontal.
What do you mean? A lot of people use contraception so they can have sex without procreating. Most sex today is of this type.
Well in a way it isn't that much different from OEM deals that kept other OSes out of the PC game, even if OEMs were willing to take part.
Or it's a great way to counter the shortage by instead offering a new product that uses parts more easily available. We'll see.
Yes. You often also have to pay for parking in many places. The price you see online is rarely what you pay for. But that's part of the culture, it's the same for restaurants, online purchases etc.
This is pretty nice!
Wrong tree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sycamore_Gap_Tree
We messed around on a recent KLM flight and what's interesting is that you get a DNS prefix of klm.com in DHCP (or some ms extension of it). The gateway has a name of www that allows you to access www.klm.com even though no name servers are accessible so DNS shouldn't work.
Some other discussions:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37680126

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37680522
> We’ve moved far beyond the whole “it works on my computer” thing

I dunno. I've had things working on my docker image quite a few times while breaking at the deployed one.

This is only passed if you have complete transparency of the entire build and deployment pipeline, total access to the images repository, actual control over the building instructions, etc. That's about as restrictive as control over a local OS, and I do expect it to fail on about as many organizations as the ones that had problems with code breaking when moved into another machine.
It's worth clarifying the somewhat ambiguous subject and object of your moral relativism example.

"Bob using lots of water to grow cannabis instead of crops during a drought may be good or bad depending on whether people around Bob care about the poor — moral relativism

Because there is confusingly similar, yet orthogonal concept, ethical subjectivism, which argues that ethical statements can be universally either true or false, but that the truth value of such statements is tied to one's subjective reality. Whereas moral relativism says that the moral nature of one's actions should be judged by the moral culture they are acting within, ethical subjectivism concludes they should be judged by the ethics of the person doing the judging.

This avoids the key pitfall of moral relativism: "One should be judged on the basis of the moral culture they are embedded in" is, in of itself, a universal claim.