skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Bizarrely, many search engines seem to think it would be helpful to truncate the titles of search results. For example, the example search "python exceptions" suggested by Kagi on their homepage results in:

> How to Handle Exceptions in Python: A Detailed Visual...

A search on DuckDuckGo displays the complete title.
Can confirm Zalando & Crunchy are quite a mess, contrary to CNPG. See my other post https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37618886
> If I tell you that you sometimes miss opportunities, it's not because I'm clairvoyant, but because statistically, most people do.

Your choice of the word "clairvoyant" is revealing. So-called clairvoyants, palm readers, horoscopes, fortune-tellers, and so forth, lean on cold-reading skills. As it happens, the kind of information LLMs have about things like what people on the internet do for content creation is exactly the sort of thing that allows a high degree of Barnum effect to influence the person.
It sounds like it has some neat new features. But I'll never know because I'm never again going to use another Oracle thing. There's not a thing they could make that's good enough for me to agree to one of their EULAs and install it. Their behavior in that area is just staggeringly bad.
It probably is human caused and we're probably going over the falls because we're shit at long-term planning.

But prevention can still soften the blow. Just because you're about to have a hard landing doesn't mean you take your hands off the stick.
Calm down, Satan. Go back to your job writing healthcare UI/UX.
During the pandemic a ton of people saw an opportunity to move in a low COL area and get a remote dev job. The market is flooded with people with no degrees / bootcamp willing to work remotely. This was kinda working while companies had no other choice than to hire remotely due to the sanitary situation.

Now that we are back to normal; many companies are going to hire in-site. The one that aren't have an immense pool to choose from. And you having no degrees and being out of work for a long time means you are at the bottom of that pile. Unfortunately, this is the consequence of your decision to favour your short term comfort over your long term employment (I know I am going to get downvoted to oblivion for this).

At this point, you need to act as if you were new to the market and target junior positions. Since you cannot afford high COL, maybe aim for mid/low COL cities, and get ready to relocate there - possibly getting a loan to afford the move. If you can; try getting some form degree, online certification, etc. Everything a new dev would be doing; but use your experience to speedup the process and get good grades.

Good luck !
> This is the same as the FTC and others.

No, its not; the Fed has a board of five commissioners, not a single director. This is rather the norm for independent executive-branch agencies with leadership that can be removed only for cause.
Apple chooses not to do that, to be able to give a controlled experience, to be able to review apps and screen them, and to, yes, benefit from the pricing power that allows them.

They don't have to allow more competition in their own store. There are other stores you can sell apps through.
I think it's because people (rightfully) associate interactive programming with Lisp, and (wrongfully) associate interpreting with interactive programing, since loading compiled machine code into a running program is foreign to most people who do not use Lisp.
> CloudNativePG exclusively relies on the Kubernetes API server to maintain the state of a PostgreSQL cluster.

This is scary af. Kubernetes API server is very finicky and unreliable. It's probably the first component that fails in Kubernetes no matter what the problem is (eg. I recently managed to run it into unrecoverable state by accidentally starting 10K jobs instead of 100).

This is just outright bad idea... but, really "reliable" and Kubernetes don't belong together. So, if you wanted an unreliable PostgreSQL, which you have no idea how it's managed and how to recover... well, that sounds like fun!
SEO junk page will have a couple share buttons with tracking pixels for the major advertisers like google and meta.
> They have tried repeatedly for decades and spent huge gobs of money. It is not a choice, they are incapable of it.

First of all, I don't think that's true, and if it is, I would like to see proof of Apple submitting their products for evaluation.

Second, you are judging an entire industry. This is not about Apple shortcomings, there isn't a single vendor doing what you say needs to be done.

Regardless, and this is more a personal opinion than a hard fact, most certifications out there are BS. PCI-DSS is basically a checklist of best practices, CC goes from common sense stuff to essentially impossible to achieve unless designed for the specific purpose, etc. Yes, all these helped create a very healthy - and profitable - industry where consultants have thrived on Powerpoints and PDFs, without really creating any tangible value.
I thought Intel MPX was deprecated?
>This doesn’t appear to be the case legally speaking.

How can you defend injustice toward them using the very legal system that has subjugated them?

>Why do you assume this? Because of their heritage? Americans didn’t move in yesterday, they’ve also been here for centuries and these environmental issues are pretty recent in comparison. You seem to be making a gross assumption here and playing along with their political ploy. Not saying they want the resource wealth but that doesn’t mean they don’t have an incentive to play up the environment for their own territorial gain.

It's what I was taught in my forestry program at Cal. Native American strategies that included routine prescribed burning worked better to replenish the forest than ours of absolute fire suppression that has led to more intense and out-of-control fires that decimate forests and their wildlife, for example.
I actually agree completely with that; my initial reply doesn't quite put the focus where it needs to be.

So let me try again: in my view, you shouldn't think of policies or laws impacting real people by ever placing yourself outside of the reality in an ideal case, because the hard bit is not conjuring ideals but finding a way of making them happen.

It's always a lot messier where the rubber meets the road. People have already died and suffered because ideals (specifically around asset ownership) that weren't quite thought through, but caught on. Take communism as an example.

Part of my point is that such "implementation details" are not as unrelated to the central argument as they seem. This is very different from the software world where it might be ok to assume that in 2 years we'll have the computations be 10x as fast and work out a solution backwards from there.
You're not contradicting the point of the article.

>> As Evans summarized, models that have memorized "Tom Cruise's parent is Mary Lee Pfeiffer" in training, fail to generalize to the question "Who is Mary Lee Pfeiffer the parent of?". But if the memorized fact is included in the prompt, models succeed.

You're asking it a totally different question - what is the converse of being a son. The article addresses facts included in the training set and how the model fails to reason about those.
The big reason is that the different scores come out of the models. That may seem counter-intuitive, but models tend to be very tied to specific populations in specific ranges, and stability is often as valuable as predictability. Different model behavior - up or down - means that financial institutions have to retest their entire strategy to make sure that it doesn't screw up the segmentation and models that they have layered on top of various credit scores. This is not a trivial or short process - It's pretty common to see 6 month and 12 month champion/challenger tests.

Even then, assuming that there is not a significant lift in predictability (unlikely as the FICO score is good at what it does) or addressability (do people who previously had a thin file now have enough data to make a decision) then you also end up looking and saying that it's not worth the changes to move to a newer score.

Also, scores are incredibly regulated. Proving that the model you layer on top of the FICO score doesn't have a disparate impact (something standing in as a proxy to a protected bit of information such as ethnicity) is expensive.

VantageScore doesn't really change this; it's a copycat of the FICO score that came about because the credit unions don't like having the score aspect out of their control and would rather people just pay them instead of an independent third party instead.

The only thing that really would change the score in any way is additional data - but social media mining for scores is not acceptable outside of China (where their score predicts compliance with government not credit risk).
The piece of paper is an experiment in the outside world; if you have external memory you're limited by the speed of using it. Of course, any known AIs aren't nearly (or at all) as capable of using them as people are.
Not necessarily. Figma outputs the appropriate CSS - I think you could probably pattern-match one to the other with a relatively simple model by looking at sizes, colors, shadow settings, defined states, and perhaps even by rendering it out and doing image matching.
Probably more like 10 or 15 years or so
The default android browser used to let you just double tap to reflow text to the current zoom level, mostly like reducing the window width on desktop.
Categorization seems like low-hanging fruit given the age of AI we are in today.
LICENSE AGPL3

https://github.com/ananthakumaran/paisa/blob/master/COPYING

I won't use this because I can't ensure all my systems can be agpl3. Like bank systems I don't control.
Yes, but if we want to compress the size of a single implementation, it'll start looking like Huffman encoding where Tom Cruise is encoded with fewer bits (higher in the tree) than Pfieffer.
That’s called a natural monopoly which is a well studied phenomenon. Most commonly they are regulated as utilities with guaranteed low returns on capital and limited ability to set prices.
No one can provide examples. But it doesn't mean they are lying. They may think it's better but actually isn't. Maybe it is worse but people are protective over it because their identity is connected to it's success.
Why use strings and pass them around in the first place? Why not limit the use of String types to system boundaries where data must be serialized into or from character-oriented streams?
> supporting Postgres so much easier.

Easier in the sense that you don't know what it's doing... It's not hard to deploy PostgreSQL and make it do something. Making it do what it needs to do well is a completely different thing. Tools like this one (or any other management tool that comes from outside) aren't helping you to make it easier. To make things easy you need to learn how to do them. They make it easy to waste a ton of resources on things you don't need for the faction of performance you can get.
Indeed. Windows ads can be disabled.
Speaking as a GPL/"Free" software partisan, we failed. Although I don't like it, I think it's pretty clear. Most people have no idea what the GPL is, even most people who have heard of it don't seem to understand what it was trying to accomplish.

The farmers fighting for the "right to repair" their own tractors are the front of the battle now.
Have you considered mock interviews with someone just to make sure you’re not self sabotaging?
Sounds like code that's worth learning how to test.
Far from left field related.

> Instead of looking at a measure as a collection of individual notes that must be perceived, interpreted and executed in sequence, they take it in as a chunk.

This is how Morse code is done. Not as individual letters, but as the sound of the stream. You don’t listen for letters per se, just rhythms of the sounds and patterns of letter combinations and words.
That’s all they were able to gather.
I can't find any git repos on gitness.com, where are they?
Awesome work! I used it to summarize an hour long podcast I had been meaning to watch and it worked fabulously. What's amazing is that the transcript is auto-generated and of a conversation between two individuals without any indication of who's actually speaking. Yet GPT-3.5 is able to make sense of it.

Out of curiosity I downloaded the transcript myself with `youtube_transcript_api --format text` and counted the tokens via ttok [0], it was a tad over 16k. So what does your site do in that case? Is the transcript truncated?

[0]: https://github.com/simonw/ttok
It's interesting that we just assume it makes sense for the patient to self assess what level of care they need.

I wonder if there are sensible reasons to not have a single point of contact for unscheduled care, or if it is just dumb inertia?

I know there are some hospitals that have provided urgent care type services at urgent care type prices in their emergency rooms, I haven't looked to see if it worked well or if they are still doing it.
The fundamental diff between feature flags and config is the former is meant to be a soft deploy of code where everyone is expected to eventually be on the new code. Thus it should have a timer built in where it stops, and you should consider all new customers launching with it on.

As for why: if you don't deprecate the feature flag in some time span, you're permanently carrying both code paths. With ongoing associated dev and qa resources and costs against your complexity budget.

Permanent costs should only be undertaken after careful consideration, and should be outside the scope of a single dev deciding to undertake them. Whereas flags should be cheap to add to enable dev to get stuff into prod faster while retaining safety.

Permanently making something a config choice should be done after heavier deliberation because of the aforementioned costs, and you often want different tools to manage it. Including something heavier duty than a single checkbox/button in your internal CS admin tooling. These are often tied into contracts or legal needs, and in many cases salesforce should be the source of truth for them. Or whatever CPQ system you're using.
There are consulting groups who specialise in infrastructure work and can provide the engineering oversight, cost analysis and most importantly have lawyers who can effectively negotiate the contract. It's often the lack of experienced lawyers that allow for projects to go off the rails without any recourse.

As often as they are utilised in the planning stage, they are also called in as expert witnesses and negotiators when projects do go off the rails.
I’ve had this happen to me as a cash/self-pay/no insurance involved patient before. They’re shameless.
>According to whom? Doesn’t seem out of the question for people to both have viewed them as demons or monsters and for certain people to have mated with them

cf. The Gnarly Man[0][1] by L. Sprague de Camp. It's fiction, but addresses that facet of potential interactions between hominid species.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gnarly_Man

[1] https://www.galacticjourney.org/stories/600411gnarly.htm
Sorry, forgot to clarify: most other places provide socialized medicine.
Having a lot of experience with that stack... it is why i migrated to scala long ago
Not if it takes 3 remote workers to do the work of 1 in office worker.
The Romantic Sufi: The Divan of Kamal Khujandi Copied by Jaʿfar Tabrizi
Funny that you mention that. I was just reading about Luiz André Barroso, the guy that invented the cloud computing.

> “Wait, wait, wait, but why are we doing it this way?” Barroso said on the podcast. “And it just turns out that the people who had been living in that area hadn't really thought about questioning that. And sometimes it's something that was based on a good reason three years ago, and that reason had a sell-by date, and it's time to do something else.”

Good thing for the world, guys with the mindset like you doesn't prevent guys like Barroso great work.

"Luiz André Barroso had never designed a data center before Google asked him to do it in the early 2000s. By the time he finished his first, he had overturned many conventions of the computing industry, laying the foundations for Silicon Valley’s development of cloud computing."
> They also take a large portion of what would normally be your salary.

This sounds like a horrible deal. Where are they finding the jobs? Why can't people put in a little work and bypass them?
When I ran Windows 7, I was pretty fastidious about cpu consumption, and never observed Steam consuming more than 1-2 CPU percent on average assuming it was collapsed to the system tray and wasn't downloading game updates in the background.

I don't think there's any grand conspiracy like you make it out to be, perhaps you've had an outlier experience.
As a kid, I learnt violin and trombone to a very high orchestra level standard, and could read sheet music from a very early age. I then moved on in my late twenties to guitar, bass and keyboard in a rock band, and never looked at a piece of sheet music again in my life, and would have no idea how to translate musical notation to those instruments.

I know people who cannot play a tune without sheet music. I know some of the most talented musicians on this earth who cannot read sheet music. There is no right and wrong to this. It's what works for you.

I do think some form of formal music theory training is an absolute cheat code when it comes to playing multiple instruments, or just jamming and playing by ear though
They'd get banned on the spot from any western store.

Imagine applying to Amazon US with a "General Electronics" brand of stoves. It wouldn't up them to decide if they get a listing or not on the site.
That may be true if you are building this today. There evidently were enough problems with that setup back when these pony motors were common to make the use of a pony motor instead of battery power more practical. Perhaps it was a battery efficiency issue or one where a battery couldn't supply enough amperage to generate the torque required for a standard starter to cause the diesel engine to start and run. I know that a pony motor starter was standard on old heavy equipment diesel engines until the late 1940's and possibly after that.
And yet people still use it.

It's like Lastpass. No matter how obvious it is, people just won't move on.
We all have a limited number of heartbeats in our lives. There are far more claims made than we have time to individually assess ourselves. Someone making repeated false claims is a good metric to use when deciding whether analysis of certain claims are worth our time to evaluate.
What I really want is LSW. A paid, reasonably priced ($10/instance?) but semi-disposable binary-blob VM to run games and other commercial applications in, with privileged access to the GPU, and without privileged access to network interfaces.
This is everything that's wrong with modern software. Do not introduce a pointless dependency like python because of a lack of knowledge about the build system of choice. Just use something more appropriate (that isn't python).
It works, but it does something different than it used to. It used to only include results that actually contained the exact phrase you put within quotes. That is no longer the case.
LastPass: ‘Horse Gone Barn Bolted’ Is Strong Password
It's great, but irrelevant since Scala is already so far ahead. I will start to care if i am ever forced to do java again. I love how much better Java is getting! Most of these things we have had in scala for a long time already, and much better versions.
Ironically, OP can still upgrade their iPhone 7 to iOS 15. Apple claims that 94% of iPhones are on iOS 15 or later.

[1] https://developer.apple.com/support/app-store/
"We would like you to fix our money-printing machine and we would like you to do it alone, on the cheap, with no days off, while completely burnt out".

Yeah, good luck not getting hacked again. This entire team of upward failures they call "management" needs to be fired immediately.
I actually worked on this feature at krea, happy to answer any technical questions about how this works / is trained
> Google Search has two masters, users and advertisers

No, it doesn't. It has one master: advertisers. Advertisers are the customer. Users are the product. Search results are the bait.

This is self-evidently true. Your customer is the one who pays for your services. Google's users don't pay, never have, never will, because search is not a product you can sell.

User attention, on the other hand, is a very valuable commodity for which people will pay handsomely.
I've used this in the past, but switched to Vimium-C after this incident:

https://github.com/brookhong/Surfingkeys/issues/1796
I wish there were a clearer explanation of what this means. Obvs if they are declaring legal sovereignty it’s a pretty important development. But there is a big difference between a press release and the first time they take actions that contradict the presumed US sovereignty.

But still the article doesn’t make clear to me if that’s what’s actually going on.
It really doesn't take more than 20 minutes to get access to the motherboard of a MacBook. Are you under the notion that you need to fully strip down the computer before being able to diagnose it? You don't. You just pop the back cover, replace the battery with a bench power supply, and start testings. You can do most tests without removing the board from the chassis. You might eventually need to get access to the other side of the board, but again it doesn't take 20 minutes to do that.

Here's a video where they remove and put back a MacBook Air motherboard in 13 minutes, on camera (https://youtu.be/Sk8kj_y32mU?si=4fUoXux_zLIGg-9B).

I already took into account a pessimistic 50% repair success rate at a salary double what most shops pay.
Opel basically does not exist in the US.
The Case Against the Server Side Public License (SSPL)
You wish it was whataboutism, but in a topic about mens mental health, it's absolutely relevant
Oof, this just proves that their strategy works. By limiting the availability of panels, 3rd party repair shops are left with very poor quality rejects. What happens is that Apple disallows any of their suppliers to sell panels on the open market, so 3rd party repair shops aren't able to get good panels, then Apple points to the 3rd party repair shops with shitty screens and tells you that you shouldn't trust 3rd party repair shops because the quality of their repairs aren't up to par. If appropriate parts were available, there would be no reason that someone with basic soldering skills and the ability to use a screw driver wouldn't be able to replace your screen with one just as good as it came with out of the box.

You've fallen for the scam.
Neat, there is a tracking issue to add support in the iTerm2 repo as well: https://gitlab.com/gnachman/iterm2/-/issues/10017
That’s fine. It’s not the Apple Reusing Program. It’s the Apple Recycling Program. Why are they complaining about reuse when the market for reuse would be a drop in the bucket. Recycling and making new phones that people actually want to buy is a better strategy than attempting to salvage components. Yes, reuse parts would be better if people wanted to keep the same phone for that long. The problem is that they don’t.
For many their local or state network infrastructure bottle neck would still exist for a couple of decades assuming pre existing technology.

Site designers would of course assume it is totally ok to start using 100 meg API all the time to load up a mere page.

In the end I would guess the advertising to content ration would drastically change ... if one is a mere consumer, then for the worse.