skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
See my other post in this thread, I lump them all together as "bad & unhelpful"

"This stands for Stewart, Colbert, Klepper, Oliver, Noah, etc."
Nope; I had a fold out one for a while but inevitably one side seems to go bad.

In the end I got Apple’s Bluetooth keyboard, I like the scissor actuation or whatever, but it is slightly too big to be as portable as a cellphone.
Sorry, but we don't know you either, so a word-of-mouth referral doesn't tell us much here. The Google Drive link doesn't provide anything substantive, like links to peer-reviewed, published research.
This seems like a pretty huge caveat (from the "Methodology for Inoculation, and Caveats" doc in their linked GDrive):

> Do not expose children under the age of five to this strain, including by sharing food or liquids with them. Disruptions to early microbiome development can carry through someone’s entire life.
> The only way to acquire know-how is by doing

That is verifiably false, people learn by watching all the time. You can argue that doing is the best way to learn, but it definitely isn't the only way to learn.
Seems to be quite an improvement. Thank you for the tip!
But it would be even better if it had "stylus mode" because, with a precision stylus, it's easier to tap directly alternate characters than to drag from the center of the button toward the needed variant.
Osiris-Rex: NASA confirms return of asteroid Bennu samples
I have nothing against Copenhagen per se (I prefer Rovelli's RQM which is a minor extension of it), it's that until we have evidence otherwise there's quite a space of consistent metaphysics that are equally valid.

That freedom is what needs to be emphasized because a lot of paradoxes in one interpretation are not in another because they basically boil down to your choice of metaphysical assumptions about the universe.

None of them alter the calculations or observables (so far) which is why saying one is more practical than the other is missing the point.
> I think this question is a bad one.

With respect, I disagree. A pair of comments I made elsewhere in this thread bear that out.

> > Does frame dragging originate at the event horizon or at the singularity/ringularity?

> You can ask it only for an in-falling observer

Both the geodetic effect and the Lense-Thirring (LT) effect, forms of "frame dragging", have been demonstrated in Earth orbit, for example by Gravity Probe B <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_Probe_B>.

I think we can agree that there is neither an event horizon nor a singularity associated with Earth, and that since GP-B continues to orbit Earth after almost twenty years, it was not doing any sort of in-falling during its mission.

The tl;dr answer to the question you think is a bad one is that Kerr exterior spacetimes -- even those that are not black holes -- induce LT, which is roughly an altitude-dependent mismatch between a vector pointing to something far away that is parallel-transported around the spinning central mass and around the same mass if it were not spinning. On extended objects occupying a range of altitudes above a spinning mass, an LT torque is induced.

No black hole needed.

The paper press-released in TFA the spinning object is a black hole, which lets one get much closer to the centre of mass (because a BH is compact compared to a planet) and because can spin much faster than a planet (which would tend to fly apart), which lets the LT effect be stronger. It also contemplates a large accretion disc in which LT torques can create pronounced observable effects.

The singularity is not relevant to the analysis (it is not even mentioned in the paper). The horizon is barely relevant: towards the horizon they reduce the resolution of the adaptive mesh they calculate with and justify doing so in a couple of ways -- most of the interesting physics are at least 2R and mostly above 4R, where R := r_g which is the Kerr equivalent of the Schwarzschild radius r_s.
Git needs some queries that filesystems arent very good at natively, like "get all modified files". There are workarounds but yeah.
I'll raise my hand and say I'll gladly live another 30, 300, or 3,000 years longer than we currently do. Why in the hell would I want to cease existing?
I used to spearfish and stopped, then began recording videos of fish. The difference in their behaviour was dramatic.

A genus of fish where I live called the Greenling (I’ve seen kelp, rock, and painted greenling) is very curious in my experience, which spans around 5 years of shooting them and 2 years of recording them.

With the speargun out and hunting mode on, they were unfortunately still curious, but far more apprehensive. They’d leave their perches on the rocks earlier to get away or try to hide in camouflage, not moving a muscle. I’d often pick them off of their rocks when they stayed still. However, with a camera, hunting mode off, they will swim circles around me, leave their perches and move around more, rarely staying completely still. They don’t perceive me as an immediate threat, and some (especially kelp greenling) really want to get close and check me out. They will follow me up after dives, check out the sand I’m tossing up, or just reorient casually to watch me.

When a greenling wants to escape, it knows its environment extremely well and it will race strategically to a spot where it doesn’t think you can access it. It doesn’t go for the nearest spot; it goes for a hidey hole that contextually makes sense. They almost never wind up under a rock where I can get them. The same goes for other fish. They go to specific deep hides they’ve already charted out, even if it means going a little further.

I believe this because I hunted the same spots over and over, sometimes camped on specific spots for a week and diving for hours per day. I came to discover that certain hotspots had very particular safe zones that the fish were well aware of. If a fish took off towards certain features, I’d essentially give up the pursuit; they’d wind up way too deep in a recess to shoot or retrieve. I wasted so much time trying to find them before I figured out that they’re way better at hiding than I imagined.

I don’t think it’s possible for fish to be this good at knowing their environment and how to hide without being somewhat clever. They have mental maps, they know what’s trying to get them (not necessarily a speargun specifically, but an animal that requires a deep hide to escape from), and they evaluate when and how to escape contextually.

I’ve watched seals go after greenling and their strategy differs quite a bit. They will simply squeeze under a rock and wait. The seals will rub their noses into the cracks and crevasses, check stuff out, then you can swim around shortly after and the greenling are still out and about. They understood the danger and hid accordingly, then came back out once the seals left.

Learning this is why I stopped shooting them. Fish aren’t just meat torpedos with special sensors in their heads. They seem sentient to me.
> Outside of the US, Whatsapp is pretty much _the_ messaging app

In Europe Telegram is huge. 1 billion Telegram users in the world, with 700 MAU (and there are already some countries where Telegram is the most used messenger).

I refuse to use WhatsApp (and don't have FB). Most of my friends and family are on Telegram. Many have both and use both interchangeably.
The link quite clearly states the land is under dispute. While the two countries may disagree which of them owns it, they quite clearly agree nobody else does. I'm not an expert in international law, but I'm quite confident you would be laughed out of the room trying to claim ownership of the land in an international court.
... that's all mentioned in the article.

The person alleging he hit the daughter is his ex wife and her own sister testified she is a recurrent liar.
And yet, conservatives will happily just make up rules that aren't found anywhere in the written law to allow them to crush people under the justice system. Younger Abstention is an especially egregious example.
It runs on or depends on so many disparate software packages that each comes with their own versioning strategy, security model, etc.

Usually when you install a package in a linux distro either the distro or the package maintainer of the package you install is responsible to ensure it keeps working (with varying levels of effort depending on distro, support strategy, etc...).

With these sort of amalgamation packages that becomes weird. Nobody is responsible and its built with many parts that never tested new versions in that configuration.

You need to either understand what you run or understand who you delegated that understanding to.

This is true for individual packages and even more for amalgamations like this.

In most of these amalgamations you delegated it to nobody and you don't realize until it breaks and you cannot fix it.
The reason why both countries refuse to claim ownership is actually really interesting: both sides agree that the Danube should be considered the border, but the Danube has changed course over the centuries in a way that left a lot more land on the east than was there before. Naturally, that means that Croatia insists on using the historical path of the Danube, while Serbia insists on the modern one. For either side to claim the land on the west of the current Danube would be to cede the larger quantity of land to the east.
Nice debunking of debunking there, you found an argument and now debunking is debunked!
Flying is miserable because consumers demand low prices. There is no forces that would change this when applied to trains.
The way I understand it, the testimony that the defendant shook one or more infants angrily onbdifferent occasions would be, according to (b)(1) "Evidence of [an]other crime, wrong, or act, which is not admissible to prove [...] that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character.

In other words, you can't argue that given there is evidence that the defendant shook babies in anger before, he is the kind of guy who shakes babies in anger, and therefore this is evidence in favour of him having shaken this baby to death.

Regarding (b)(2), I interpret that the testimony that the defendant shook infants in anger in the past would only be admissible under (b)(2) if the previous acts were "proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident". I cannot see how having shaken an infant in the past could provide evidence for any of the above as relates to the separate and specific alleged infant-shaking event for which the defendant was on trial.
We mine vastly more copper, coal, etc than lithium.
Yes, sorry, I know that timestamp business is confusing but it's the least confusing of the options I know of.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
What material provides a better value than quartz for countertops?

Objectively, it has a very high utility per dollar. Heat resistant, water resistant, knife resistant, stain resistant, etc.
Today the leading cause of death is heart disease. In that era it was infectious disease. You could have a cushy job doing numbers work in a city and still die of tuberculosis from being in close quarters. People were fine with it because everything was terrible.

In the century between the 1850s and 1950s we went from not even having radio communications or the germ theory of disease to building nuclear submarines and fiber optic data networks.

Once we had penicillin and cities stopped dumping raw sewage into the water supply, people started to have better options and these kinds of businesses had to improve safety to attract workers.

If you had to choose between the job you have now and the ones they had then, how much more would they have to pay you to get you to choose the latter? More than it costs for the safety equipment, right? So they started installing it.

Then governments passed laws requiring it because politicians are adept at taking credit for good things that were about to happen regardless.
> Cancer is now usually not a sudden death sentence - treatment is good enough now that most cancers caught early can be treated and patients often go through multiple remissions before it or a complication from treatment finally gets them.

Small clarification - early detection is most often curative and cheap.

The really expensive part is that several advanced stage cancers (even IV with widely disseminated metastatic disease) now survive for many years on treatments costing low to mid 6 figures/year.

It actually provides a pretty good incentive for insurers to cover screening and early detection beyond what is mandated by law.
How was the wellfare at that point? :-)
Along these lines, I hate trying to upvote on hacker news. My finger usually almost clicks downvote and often does.
This comment describes the research: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37635401
> Breaking: Comedians make shit up.

Yes, but if you’re personally claiming to be a victim of another race then you ought to be broadly telling the truth. Making jokes about terrible things you experienced doesn’t make any new victims but lying about what other races have done does make victims. Otherwise, you’re handing material to actual racists who can now factually call you a liar and by association call into question other true reports.
This is likely a TMobile issue since the connection gets proxies back to the US when using their roaming service, which slows things down a lot.
They are not saying it is best in all circumstances. They are strictly saying it is best for a small startup. IE. it is best for the short term, sloppy business of getting a tech startup off the ground. This makes some sense to me as everything is less structured in a startup and remote work really does better when there is more structure in place and quality is more important.

To put it another way... In-person is best for the business in the short term and detrimental to their long term but it is a sacrifice startups make as they have no long term without the short term success so just punt all the long term stuff until they've made it that far.
Thanks. I don’t know how much RSI I’d be saved from if I knew this years ago. Apple, if you’re listening, you should advertise this better. Ok, maybe not for the new iPhone user, but maybe for a user in his 2nd year or one which does a lot of text input.
There are great artistic and cultural reasons to let this happen.

After all, look what happened with Kugelmugel - another of these liberal experiments:

https://theculturetrip.com/europe/austria/articles/kugelmuge...

Spoiler: the bigger states always win.
They’re using a recognizably similar technique. They recognized the similarity and said so. What purpose does it serve to nitpick a detail which apparently isn’t material to their usage, and which could trivially be adapted for anyone who cares about the outline size?
Constant 50% utilization is not!
μMon: Stupid simple monitoring (2022)
Seriously, my self reply showing output from Falcon 180B is flagged??
> It is land that Croatia very actively considers someone elses land.

It doesn't consider the land to be "someone elses land" it considers the Serbian definition of the shared border faulty. Letting people that cite the Serbian definition of the border settle there is the last thing they want, since it actively undermines their own definition of where the border between it and Serbia should be over its entire length.
Not sure I agree/understand, but it seems like if I’m inhaling 2x the poison over the same amount of time, that has exactly 2x the impact/risk on your health.

This isn’t the same as something like a virus, where it’s more binary.

To be clear, I’m not arguing to prove I’m right (because I’m certainly not an expert and am open to being wrong), I’m trying to understand more about how particle inhalation can have varying risks (or not) based on density.
Cool Easter Egg ! (?)
This is based on the assumption that sugar causes obesity - I don't think there's any strong evidence for that, or that low carb diets work better for fat loss than low fat, from what I've seen both have same effect (calories equated) and both have equally terrible long term adherence/outcomes. Sugar seems like a nice villain but it's more likely that you'd have to tax any high calorie food that tastes good.

And what about physical activity ?
The WoW wiki is also leaving Fandom.

In my experience the Fandom wiki will stay always above the new wiki in google, making this move pointless.
Yeah I think it's worth thinking through how to make the data easy to be portable

I know that sounds counterintuitive, and that data lock in is usually valuable, but I think it's generally a liability and history seems to show that building great services around mostly open components is the best way to build software for longevity and happiness.

If you can improve on or coopt an open contact format, that is third party accessible, and then you build the best interface and services around that, then you might have something important and lasting here!

Thanks
Ah yes “the poors don’t deserve to afford toilet paper because market forces and capitalism!”

It’s amazing what tech bros making 6 figures will say from their ivory towers.
That bug was caused by the TLS slots pointer being uninitialized in the newly created Boost fiber, not a change in Windows API. TLS pre-dates boost::context, the field had existed since the very first commit.

I already said "MS would rather you not", obviously, otherwise they would have documented the TIB.

The fact remains that tons of production systems rely on officially-unofficial elements of NT's architecture and this is one such element that is heavily relied on by everyone who uses boost stackful coroutines. Hyrum's Law in action.
There's a special place in hell for WYSIWYG editors on mobile.

It's less WYSIWYG and more "what you're getting is what we interpreted you wanting, good luck"
Not only feasible but equally valuable. It’s simply how humans orient their thoughts, and we have no evidence that this has intrinsic value over a being which doesn’t do this.
The problem: many elders have trouble with pulling a chair out from the table, sitting, and scooting back in.

Isn't a more obvious solution to make a chair that can turn like an office chair, but without the wheels? You could improvise this out of an office chair with a wheel lock control.
Hardware sales are not the primary revenue stream for Apple, it's services. Would iPhone be the same if there was no need to sell iCloud and iTunes?
There are many folks who confuse cynicism with thoughtfulness and intelligence.
Smokers specifically are very much a net cost to society, because smoking kills slowly and in a very expensive manner.

In any case, anything that makes people die young, or more generally reduces people’s capacity to work (like many diseases of affluence) is incredibly expensive to society once you factor in indirect and opportunity costs.
The first 'synthetic' embryos [video]
I’ve literally never seen a meeting grind to a halt like that. Instead, meetings are full of half-baked ideas, and I sometimes notice show-stoppers hours later when it’s quiet.
Why not require companies to get consent from the person to store the data, regardless where they get it from?
I think the person took “do the same” too literally lol. Likely there was no ill intent.

They also might have been asking the question: “Does 0.5px vs 2px matter in any significant way?” The answer to that question is still no. But I could see how someone who’s unfamiliar with the outline property could ask the question.
Been playing it since I read your recommendation, nice, but as others commented, I might need to move to the tablet to continue with the larger ones. Thanks again !
Healthcare (including dental) costs have outpaced inflation though. The price of all those procedures is likely to increase more than inflation.

Similar to how it would be a bargain to have paid for a college education today 20 years ago.
Mac users targeted in new malvertising campaign delivering Atomic Stealer
"a deeply impoverished utopianism". That about sums it up.
Yeah, this isn’t really useful. :(
One of my few non-libertarian opinions of "how things should be" is that somebody should find an ADA angle to make sites requiring scripting completely illegal, with very narrow exceptions like games. Equivalent functionality in HTML, or pay damages cause screen readers, or something. I the site with the complexity of GMail can do it, so can vast majority of the internet.

Modern Javascript functionality on an average site adds as much value as sparks chasing the mouse pointer in the nineties, and appear to be developed by people with, again on average, even less aptitude for software.
Genetics seems to be weird when it comes to teeth.

I (foolishly) stopped seeing a dentist at all after college. I finally managed to force myself to go around 15 years later. My enamel was worn down, my teeth discolored (not terribly, but noticeably), and my gums were not in great shape, but I ended up with only two cavities that needed to be drilled and filled. After resuming regular dental visits, my teeth are fine. My general oral hygiene prior to that was ok, but not great (2x daily brushing most of the time & mouthwash, very occasional flossing).

A friend of mine does everything right: mostly avoids sugary foods, brushes after meals), mouthwash, flossing, and he goes to the dentist every 4 or 6 months for a cleaning. But he still has many dental issues to deal with, and has had quite a few cavities filled.
Heh, we seem to be talking past each other.

I wonder if this might be because Slavboj might be a monist/physicalist, and you might be a dualist[2]? If that's the case we'd all argue until we're blue in the face, if we don't at least recognize this underlying difference. For the record, since I've studied biology, I'm probably closest to some form of mechanism[3] (due to the rejection of vis vitalis [4] in early 20th c. )

Of course, you could also just be a very skeptical monist mindful of the kluger hans effect[5] and working from there.

Let me know which (if any), maybe we can still find middle ground!

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physicalism

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind%E2%80%93body_dualism

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(philosophy)

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitalism

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clever_Hans
Honestly curious what Google's plan is. With 0 developer confidence and increasingly user hostile actions like killing stadia, removing adblock and now this; to name a few, what is there plan?

Their moat is being eroded. There search sucks and is designed around their ad business. GPT search is going to basically erode this moat. Its like they are trying to be IBM.

There are obviously other profit centers but this company is really losing its footing
>98 degrees and 100% humidity

98 °F wet-bulb temperature (which is equal to the air temperature at 100% relative humidity) will literally kill you. That's higher than anything listed on Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature#Highest_r...
> India should have plenty of evidence to be able to charge him, try him, and convict him in absentia, then demand Canada extradite him. That they haven't done so is a strong hint that they don't have enough evidence that would hold up in a modern justice system.

You really need to read up on Indian laws and history. In absentia conviction isn't a thing in Indian law.

It is part of a recent proposed change:
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-law/ch....

But this is just smoke and mirrors. People in the West don't care for Indian legal system. Because "freedom of expression", "Hindu nationalists" and what not. So, this isn't going to help anyways.
I'm still shocked when people suggest making people get punished for crimes committed by members of their family. It's indefensible and absurd.
It’s not where but yes it is why.
Except for keys that have alternate accent keys, and I don't think it's possible at all on the other keys when you have swipe typing available.