skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The thing is, I don't agree with that second statement of the author's, either. You're not a "bad guy" for having boundaries (or because one guy you barely know thinks you are). Saying "I'm sorry, I just can't mix my professional and personal life like that, it's a rule I have for myself and it's nothing about you personally," is totally reasonable!

If you behave reasonably and empathetically, and someone takes issue with it, they're the one with the problem, not you. By behaving tolerantly, you make the other person's intolerance more obvious.

(Though again, like I said, not blaming the author. He clearly tried pretty hard to do the right thing here.)
Note that since June 2023, it is impossible to send email from Workers through MailChannels unless you publish a _mailchannels record in your DNS.
Christianity is based on the conversation between God and His chosen people from the creation of the world until now, with that conversation moving towards and flowing from the Incarnation, Passion, Death, and Resurrection of the Second Person of the Trinity. Part of which is in the Bible (everything is not in the Bible alone - e. g. the list of the books of the Bible isn't in the Bible)

Mere Christianity by Lewis is a pretty good introduction to the idea, as is Orthodoxy by G. K. Chesterton.
These answers seem to be quite out of date, as the aerospace industry (most notably SpaceX) has been using Linux as part of their rocket control systems for quite a while now.
> It is possible for providers who see a statically significant potion of mail traffic to see all or almost all DKIM selectors.

Yes, but you can’t know that every authenticated sender is using DKIM at all. If the mail you just recieved from a new sender (even if it is from a domain which you have recieved DKIM signed mail from before) passes SPF but is not signed using DKIM, they are quite probably from a valid, albeit rarely used, mail sender who simply does not use DKIM.

> I think what the line you quote is trying to say is reject mail from MailChannels that isn't DKIM signed.

No, they can’t be saying that, since elsewhere they say that only 105 out of 2 million MailChannel domains are using DKIM. Therefore, they can’t be reasonably suggesting to block all mail from all but 105 of these domains.
Yes! That's a great way of putting it.
Let's hope Musk will succeed in killing Twitter. I mean, "X".

It's effect on the social and political climate in the West has been disastrous.
>China gave them access to a giant pool of cheap labor in exchange for some IP transfer. I don't see how that's morally wrong.

Yes. In isolation, that would be both a reasonable and commendably planned exchange. However, the context is important.

Trading partners need to grow in the same direction. They should over time become greater allies, must profess similar beliefs in human freedom, democratic institutions, responsibility for global welfare, should not shield bad State-actors like North Korea, do not increasingly centralize power behind one man, and do not increasing be antagonistic to freedom of expression, or so thoroughy crush free speech and information at home.

For example, what it appears like is that the West's openess of the internet has put our citizens as targets for disnformation warfare, while China's tight control has their populace locked down from each other, and from the U.S., while anti U.S. rhetoric rises in China Party Statements.

So you can pretend in isolation, that the exchange was mutual and done, trading partners are supposed to be more than transactional, they are supposed to build trust.
You perfectly captured how i feel about my firestick hd.its great, bht the enshitification scaffolding is too much. Charge me 20 dollars more and throw vanilla lineageos on there and you have my business all day, as it stands i want my money back.
You ought to begin by getting really good citations on each of those figures. If you or the source you got them from had any confusion about how to arrive at those numbers, any results you get from them will likely be meaningless.

Hopefully in doing so you will start to notice the missing pieces of info and can ask more targeted questions to get better results.
It shouldn’t be surprising that Apple’s support is way better than Google’s. Apple’s support is above-average, and Google’s support; even for paying customers, is a regular punchline.
This is a pretty straightforward account of how scalpers operate. Are they only supposed to write about lemonade stands and firefighters rescuing kitties from trees?
If those videos receive no views, then it means the concept of the stitch wasn't compelling. Practically speaking -- just do it over and over again until you find something that does work.

Some people have a knack for making content that goes viral, but for most folks, it's a muscle that needs to be learned through lots of practice, with a lot of early going seemingly bearing little fruit until the inflection point is reached.
Does it specify the latter, Christianized Roman Empire, or is it more of a generalized account?

And does it retell of the common Roman, or of the Roman elite? These tales may be radically different, from what I understand.

I expect the Christianized Romans would have had more laborious conventions such as we see with the Catholic Church in the middle ages. But I'm extrapolating.
So basically make concert tickets like airplane tickets
could it be that asian devotion for kids is stronger such that even if the marriage is unhappy they will do their best to make sure the kids are ok?

western couples are less likely to do that which means that kids there will suffer more especially if their parents are openly fighting, and divorce helps them settle because happier parents makes for happier kids.
If you want to see what it looks like to be a musician whose fanbase is all rich people, look no further than your local symphony orchestra.
<Ctrl+T>!wi microplastic<Enter>

is what it took to find https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microplastics which says the same thing.

I was as surprised as you are, though
The next release of DMARC will likely include an option to exclude SPF from DMARC verification. Google's team is pushing for this on the IETF DMARC mailing list:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/PDktxOYkB28k6ukL...

We think this is a very good idea as it will allow domain owners to use DMARC but specify that they prefer DKIM to be the only mechanism that truly authenticates traffic as their own.

The industry has many workarounds for the weaknesses of SPF and DMARC, such as using SPF macros to dynamically shape authentication based on criteria one only knows at the time of SPF resolution, but none of these workarounds is better than just saying, "DKIM only for my domain, please."
I also feel awkward when a situation is new to me, keep repeating talking to strangers until you became used to it, that is how it works, that is how we make horses be calm and not freak out when they see plastic bags.
Ahh yes, another "standard". https://xkcd.com/927/
This is different because the consumers, and producers, of these images don't care if it's fake or real. They just want the picture and the bruh-cred or whatever from passing them around.

I can't think of a good text analogue. People consume clickbait and such, but the producer's motivation is different, and the consumer isn't so consciously aware of its fakeness.

One can hope that humans just get desensitized to nudity... because now its going to be basically free.
For an article this pedantic they still miss several details. “If we measured the day starting and ending when the sun’s center breached the horizon, we’d be fine; day and night would be equally parsed.”

It then list a few caveats but that’s not sufficient as the sun is going to cross the the equator at some random point in the day say 2:15:45 pm which means it’s not over the equator at sunrise and sunset thus distorting the day. The horizon is generally defined based on local terrain not the more abstract true horizon. Earth isn’t a perfect sphere rotating at a constant rate etc etc.

It’s got some amusing bit’s of trivia, but I don’t think anyone’s definition is going to actually change.
It's not impractical at all. It effectively combats any scalping and makes ticket sales honest and fair. I've managed ticket systems for large festivals and this is how we did it.
That second video is a horrible example of a counter argument. At the start of the video, the creator admits to having an agenda against Sabine due to her past comments on LGBT stuff. She also says at the start that she believes capitalism lead to most of society's ills. She also states clearly in her video that she doesn't have the proper knowledge of economics to be able to make a commentary. There is such a blatant predisposition and agenda that I am seriously baffled that you linked that video as an objective critisism of Sabine.
You can emulate waveshapers with steeper aliasing falloff than 6dB/octave, using integration-based techniques to calculate the average output value of a waveshaper when interpolating multiple input points (or something like that). There's a paper describing various orders at http://dafx16.vutbr.cz/dafxpapers/20-DAFx-16_paper_41-PN.pdf (if I remember the right link, RIP it's not HTTPS).
It's normal for JS tooling to minify symbol names in order to shrink the amount of JS being pushed to user agents; those a... symbols might actually have sensible names somewhere along the compilation pipeline.
Except it's not an open relay. MailChannels would not exist on the internet if it didn't aggressively control spam and phishing. The DEFCON talk did not prove the existence of a gaping hole; it showed something that has existed since the dawn of internet email: the sender domain cannot be adequately authenticated unless you use message signatures such as S/MIME and DKIM. And even with DKIM, DKIM replay attacks allow widespread abuse.
Yes. Though the test would only tell you that the other side has at least a few working nukes, not the proportion of working nukes.

(If a side could credibly commit to testing an unbiased (pseudo-) random sample of nukes, they would be able to convince the world that a large portion of their nukes work.

But I am not sure how you would do that without revealing all of your nukes?)
Deep down you believe that this is due to you being better in so e way. The reality is that it’s dumb luck. You were a dumb kid like everyone else was. For all we know you spent all your time inside and were afraid of slugs. A kid died and snide comments about ‘personal responsibility’ add nothing.
Your name?
This is exactly the same as:

Loyal workers are selectively and ironically targeted for exploitation [1]

People who read the GameFaq [2] already know this is how society works. Loyalty is punished, lazy cheating rewarded. Even children watching porn know the drill "She doesn't want it, but really she does. No means she wants it." That's the entire book. Extended version:

1) Select a Target, 2) Approach and Open, 3) Demonstrate Value, 4) Disarm Obstacles, 5) Isolate Target, 6) Create Emotional Connection, 7) Seduction Location Extract, 8) Pump Buying Temperature, 9) Make Physical Connection, 10) Blast Last-Minute Resistance

PS: 11) Believe nothing the entire time, 12) Reduce the opponent's value to nothing so the only redemption is intercourse, 13) You're interacting with a video game character of absolutely no value whatsoever except for the score, 14) All is Increment++, 15) Ditch in a way where there's no long term connections, 16) Be on the lookout for the next level (existence only reward the most useless. How else are you going to administratively golf, while stealing every professor in the University's money, while swearing about missing a shot on a completely flat grass lawn?)

Its only an MMO overrun with exploit users. It's just Game Theory. Backstabbing must win. Existence forces backstabbing to win. All it does is lie about being nice while being ** underneath. "Merica..."

Look at all venture capital, same strategy. "Innovate. Disrupt. Paradigm shift. We're pivoting to FinTech/AI/Social/VR/Quantum/Nano/Cyber/Cloud/Mindshare/Frameworks". Only ninja/wizard/blood ninjas need apply. "Round A/B/IPO/exit/Burn the world behind you." PS: Be rewarded with more IPOs for successfully burning money (I'm looking at you "New"man of WeWork).

Look at military innovation "Say whatever's necessary (blah, blah, warfighters, thoughts/prayers). Believe nothing. Close. Get money / rank advancement. Leave." [4]

And thus "why are there so many single children?" Because existence rewards humans for playing like Fight Club. Gotta travel around setting up franchises.

[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00221...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game:_Penetrating_the_Secr...

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory

[4] https://www.military.com/daily-news/opinions/2023/09/19/inno...
There's a layer below what is being said here and the implication thereof that I'm afraid you may be missing.

It doesn't actually matter what is "best", what matters is what is possible. The world doesn't run on "best", ever. It runs on "good enough" or "better". When people push for the ideology that I read as you asking for us to agree on, the results tend to be harmful.

You say "two parents that birth their child and stay together are best". The words gets twisted "being a single parent hurts your child"; "having a step parent hurts your child"; "having same-sex guardians hurts the child". Then the policy gets made that harms even further, "same sex couples cannot adopt", "divorce is illegal"; or, the lesser form, harm is caused to the child through broken families who have been tricked into believing that "it's good for them to stay together for the sake of the child".

Stances and arguments and acquiescing to those perspectives has a tendency to walk down very harmful paths very quickly; and, if it's not your intent to push or argue for the policies listed above, it absolutely is what the people you're referencing will push or have pushed, or people who come after you will push.
It obviously depends. It's not a one size fits all answer.
Hah! I’ve got a long way to go.
Wasn’t the whole concept of detective work fairly new when the books were being written? The earliest Holmes stories are quite indebted to Poe’s work with C. Auguste Dupin and he invented the form.
That's not at all how concert economics work, I just wrote a long comment explaining.
only very few divorces are with an abusive parent. most divorces are a disagreement between the parents without involving the kids. in those cases, the parents solving their dispute without divorce would be better. but if they can't, and the children loose access to one parent, they will be worse of.
I have never experienced talking to a stranger at a bar - one goes with ones friends, and gets to know them better, but nobody known to nobody ever gets added to the conversation.
I'm a woman

Rest assured, everything I do is somehow "wrong", even if I did exactly what some guy did.

But thank you for playing.

My last Ask HN got zero replies.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37490215
Speaking of pedantic details, I'm surprised it doesn't mention how the fact that Earth's orbit is an ellipse rather than a circle messes up the dates quite significantly (it's not February's fault).

I expect the same effect on a smaller scale would also mess up "equal day and night".
This is a terrible piece of ignore-the-facts advice. The emerging facts about the health impacts from plastics are significant and irreversible. Anxiety is a healthy human response to a threat.
With steam being hotter than the product itself, and the steam then condensing and dropping back into the food... yeah, this seems relatively self-evident, so I've been using plates since learning years ago that plastics leak into foods in the first place
Yes, because TM isn't trying to stop them. It'd be fairly easy. Hell, make you use Apple Wallet or Google Pay. Then you'd have to sell the phone too.
Wear to the road isn't the only consideration. If there's no separate bicycle path, they take up space on the road and slow down traffic. Cyclists should pay for the privilege of sharing the road with more efficient vehicles.
LBJ's Great Society created, arguably intentionally, a very steep economic incentive to break up two parent households for people in poverty - the "baby momma" phenomenon didn't just come out of nowhere.
You're pointing out the inherent challenge of domain authentication. Large domain owners like Google lock their domains down by publishing restrictive SPF records that do not authorize anyone other than their own IP space. For everyone else, SPF is a gigantic hole that you can drive a truck through.

For this and other reasons, people who actually work in the email industry do not trust SPF when authenticating domains. An SPF pass is necessary but not sufficient to know that someone is responsible for the email you just received. A far more trustworthy element is a valid DKIM signature; this certifies that the domain owner signed the message contents with a key they presumably control themselves.
Because while the point is to make money, the point is not to maximize the earnings for tours. Instead, it's to make enough to make it worthwhile, while giving fans "what they want". Artists care about doing fun/good/cool stuff!

This is similar to stuff like auctions to have dinners with certain successful people. Those people have many dinners where they don't ask for a bunch of money from the participant, because then they would only have boring dinners!
Yes, that explains why energy is so cheap in Germany and South Australia.
“so much”? This is 40k thats little. And it’s good that indies are able to achieve it.
Absolutely. For reference, here is a TXT lookup for a random large corporation:

% host -t txt bosch.com
bosch.com descriptive text "b5r8gr465ydgqlvwlwy6x7dshccwg37c"
bosch.com descriptive text "mindmanager-verification=5eacd59de90dd7d9933da220294f2906a881fa6701d64a1a4667c05abac12546"
bosch.com descriptive text "cisco-ci-domain-verification=20e8d94f041a742a6de560a038d031baf659330970e6f05bb03fb2468bba379a"
bosch.com descriptive text "v=spf1 mx redirect=_spf.bosch.de"
bosch.com descriptive text "r7bNBcUhS/tsO45+nP1dycu5UDrZ7TniKe858vhLNJwAcCNDQlpdaks8iBm3TxV9r3fCYRvup/QpaC1rdp4Dpg=="
bosch.com descriptive text "google-site-verification=avGZ684w6lq0UwXmOHxz9l6u9GL8r-sXoV7io9KzZOc"
bosch.com descriptive text "facebook-domain-verification=20380cm6fdq6h7tdcqzmhysa70ctdo"
bosch.com descriptive text "google-site-verification=jWBLaKM6WZQoAV6crbGGsAre3rSvqaDtwnCKuwvDPCg"
bosch.com descriptive text "adobe-idp-site-verification=e13fd7b27a30ca44261bc7ad3f0b2e0994b724830fe8afc38a6565a40d81bde4"
bosch.com descriptive text "google-site-verification=yeXu97OTorw4QioF3yNiDvTn-0GL8__7-iTNLEp6Vbk"
bosch.com descriptive text "docusign=4f8c3289-c1e1-42a5-a541-f3459d2da55e"
bosch.com descriptive text "docusign=95ecd2d2-2737-4b07-9d40-95d065bfbc49"
bosch.com descriptive text "atlassian-domain-verification=1XOeeaiW02aX/CXX/725tFzKFh4PA18JpZoyq9qBDqDxR2PP/9LDxCqlmYYgyb4D"
bosch.com descriptive text "77D8-D4C6-1CCC-8D85-3127-5140-11D2-956B"
bosch.com descriptive text "axway-amplify=af03bdb0-d4a8-429f-bf96-b7ba41051d49"
bosch.com descriptive text "apple-domain-verification=VYw9jmavDBjP0C9S"
bosch.com descriptive text "mongodb-site-verification=gf5347Wa7YvVkq4C51l3srxrco2GLGPl"
bosch.com descriptive text "docusign=ebea8618-97e6-4a64-82a9-2e3fa036d5bb"
bosch.com descriptive text "docusign=df164c89-5239-42d4-97f5-8f5710b1b929"
bosch.com descriptive text "miro-verification=95bb46ca27717c388e091411d7fe643e3a3d2b3d"
bosch.com descriptive text "docker-verification=224577a6-972f-4e1d-a8b9-c5fc2e8da018"
bosch.com descriptive text "klaviyo-site-verification=THKvhQ"
bosch.com descriptive text "atlassian-sending-domain-verification=e4597f31-7a29-47fd-b150-5e1eaeac437b"
bosch.com descriptive text "sFHU8FVI0Jt2PIXJAn2DWGmT7UJmZJzyq2THJmabTvEcw0IGtPu2UHU9Wf/zdvZoGAvtmO5tD3rOSvXjQWZ57Q=="
That's called a context attack...
I just wrote a post on this. We have an eBPF + SBOM based security tool and it runs great due to hooking the kernel directly via Kube DaemonSet: https://edgebit.io/blog/base-os-vulnerabilities/

tl;dr: Amazon prioritizes patching really well, fixing real issues first
Find Your Inner Finn – Master in Happiness
teachers, as a class, loudly declared they aren't essential workers.
I'm convinced that autonomous trucks are the way to go. Free from fatigue, bad training, bad driving, and all the other things that come with human drivers, it could save lives, and maybe even reduce cost for everyone.
Depends on the product you're heating though. I think it's certain fats that make it sometimes start to pop after literally a handful of seconds, and other times you can go at the highest power (I think that's 800W for me) until the food is done after five minutes and all you'll get is some steam. I've tried to use lower power settings for "normal" products that have splatter but not straight away, but that just doesn't get it all the way hot without starting to get splatter after all. Using a cover, like an inverted plate, is the way to go

I do agree about the part where you mention frying part of the product while the rest is still subzero. Power reduction is useful, for me it just doesn't adequately prevent splatter
It depends on where in Germany you live. Here in MV bicycle paths have been sprouting up like weeds.
I think we are being softened up for a definite announcement of extraterrestrial life.

First, it's exoplanet, then many many exoplanets. Then exoplanets with atmospheres, then with water, now with chemicals that indicate life.

Just like Mars. Viking 1976, weird results when testing for life. 1996, Mars Pathfinder, areography that looks like water formed it. Then rovers that find clays and other minerals that only form in liquid water. Then seasonal methane, and organic molecules in rocks.

They know. There's too much trickling out. There's ET life.
I see that your account is barely two weeks old, so in case you're new here, please take notice: this forum has standards [0]. You're posting in a manner that violates quite a few of the rules. Using snark and playing dumb to evade any risk of serious discussion will earn you a ban in any thread, with or without the context of your obvious undercurrent of bigotry.

As for this specific comment: you're still only pointing to hypotheses rather than evidence. And there are enough really obvious counterarguments that there's no way to pretend you're trying to engage in serious conversation.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
"The ingestion, by itself, isn't necessarily a copyright infringement insofar as you are doing the training in order to make a model, and a model is a different thing than the training set," Samuelson said.

No, but it could be a license violation.
With a centralized ledger. You don't have to smuggle physical dollars in any more than you have to smuggle stablecoins in.
That part did not make any sense to me. I do not see how this person determined that these domains are not using DKIM. There is no standard DKIM domain name, so what did they check?
When you consider how fashion- and trend-driven music is the optics of tickets getting slashed in price because they haven’t sold for a month are terrible.