skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is a pretty rubbish post. For a start, it doesn’t cite any primary sources or legislation. 1066 was obviously the year of the invasion, but 1362 is principally notable in English linguistic history for the Statute of Pleading. The Statute of Pleading did not deprecate French as an official language. (Indeed, the concept of a sole official language as applied is pretty anachronistic: the administration used, in a somewhat regular pattern, all three of English, French, and Latin; choice of language was more a matter of convention, habit, and fashion than official diktat.) It merely permitted the use of English in one area of government; but English was already used as an administrative language by the Normans as early as at the time of the writing of the Domesday Book. It makes very little sense (see parenthetical) to regard French as ‘the’ official language of England before the Statute; it makes even less sense to regard it as having lost that status, to the extent that such a claim means anything, after the passage of the Statute. The decline of French in English public and administrative life was a rather lengthy process, and French in fact held out longest in the field the Statute regulated, viz., the law; thus we find the famous passage from Sir Edward Coke as late as 1688:

> Richardson Chief Justice de Common Banc al assises de Salisbury in Summer 1631 fuit assault per prisoner la condemne pur felony, que puis son condemnation ject un brickbat a le dit justice, que narrowly mist, et pur ceo immediately fuit indictment drawn per Noy envers le prisoner et son dexter manus ampute et fix al gibbet, sur que luy mesme immediatement hange in presence de Court.

By this time it would have made sense to regard English as the (de facto) language of state, but law French still lived; even the Proceedings in Courts of Justice Act 1730, which mandated the use of English in court proceedings, would not have obviated the habits of those accustomed to law French in the taking of personal notes and so on.
In case anyone is interested: the RSS feed for The Atlantic is still pretty good, able to read most articles in full text.
> An obvious disadvantage would be the necessity to maintain stocks of two fuel types.

Wouldn’t a starter motor running off a battery charged by the very generator you are running just be an all around better solution? You can run some modern starter motors off a tiny 12x8 in AGM.
The statement notes that the waters are “also claimed” by the California state government, which “supports the concept” of tribal stewardship. This whole thing seems pretty insubstantial.
A well-known URI that provides SSH keys would be nice.
Helix is NICE. Thank you
The Anglo-Norman state and the Kingdom of France frequently warred, but the period in which the Anglo-Norman state held substantial parts of France was one in which its élites would not have felt the need to impose English instead of French.
> This isn't as simple as "We'll just start growing our food 100 kilometers to the north"

why not? doing that would ironically counter all your prior arguments. besides displacing the incumbents and needing adaptation, I do not see a reason why the poor need to be taxed 30% in energy costs in Seattle
Agree with the ecological preservation objectives, hard disagree with handing over of sovereignty, whatever that actually means,to a group based on their ethnicity / ancestry.
Good question. I have no idea. I doubt there is precedent!

And I can’t wait to see how this gets legally tested — native rights haven’t been properly respected and these kinds if tests are deeply important in restoring rightful sovereignty and tribal agency to our hosts and neighbors.

I’m chuckling as I imagine they’re going to do a better job of protecting and managing the Earth than the government of California and Oregon have done over the last 150 odd years.
The other people to contact there are your insurers. Despicable as some of them may be, they too hate provider fraud. Even if they don't appear to do something to censure the provider, it is on their file, and enough complaints will be problematic.

I had a similar situation with a kidney stone. Transferred from my hospital to another by ambulance - I was moved from the ambulance gurney to the surgery bed in the hallway of the ER, and was billed for a ER visit among everything else, though no care had been rendered, no ER staff had been involved (hospital transport techs), it just happened to happen in the ER, and not even in a room.
> Every incarnation of cross-platform on the market today sits somewhere between mediocre and bad in terms of the resulting UX

.. seems heavy handed..
And chicken scheme

https://www.call-cc.org/

It compiles to C, and from that to binary program
the biggest limitation it has is the memory of the computer itself, but it should theoretically be able to compute anything that is computable and put in the form of a n symbol m state tape description.
And yet we're all still here..
The new major OS releases include a version of this feature that you can enable without the parental control context/overhead. So for example if you don't want to see random penises that might get messaged to you, you can avoid seeing that.

It is optional and disabled by default, just like the child-oriented Communication Safety feature set. They call the adult-oriented version "Sensitive Content Warnings".
Your advice is sane and I can tell speaks from experience. Unfortunately, now that Github Actions are being exposed through Visual Studio, I fear that we are going to see an explosion of number 1, just because the process is going to be more disconnected from Github itself (no documentation or Github UI visible while working within Visual Studio).
Indeed. People are way underestimating how quickly this change is coming
Q: What is the difference between A.I. and Machine Learning?

A: Machine Learning exists.

Neural networks (of the machine kind) can learn, and this can (in certain narrowly defined scenarios) be useful. But, they are not intelligence, general or otherwise.
That is what closed-source software does on Linux and Windows and Mac. Usually all required libraries are shipped with the executable. Most don’t link statically, sometimes this even isn’t possible.

People also ship Microsoft’s system libraries. Windows tends to be in “undefined state” due to missing package management (file corruption), broken Windows-Update or whatever went wrong.

It is hard teaching developers not to package their software for Linux!
Native packages are maintained by distributions and require well documented dependencies only.
Instead many developers maintain themself various packages for outdated distributions not used by anyone. Examples?

* Amazons MP3-Downloader (that’s old)
* Valve (shipping only for Ubuntu but they learned to allow redistribution quickly, one of the first requests came from Arch)
* Microsoft with Teams (yes, they should know better…)

But they want to package?

Do it once with Flatpak. No Snap! No AppImage. Just Flatpak. It is designed for that usage.

Else?

Provide binaries in tar.gz, document instructions, allow in any case redistribution. Always. If need the distribution maintainers will care. If not the users can copie them just on disk.
That is because Homo Sapiens "returned" to Africa after the invention of animal husbandry and agriculture. They out-competed and drove away many traditional hunter-gatherer tribes.
Edit: As reply notes, that's code to highlight the quoted section of the article. I'm leaving my original comment below, though it's less relevant than I'd intended.

________________________________________________________

NB, your link has a long bit of cruft on it.

Decrufted: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/29/steve-jobs-and-bill-gates-wh...

That's

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/29/steve-jobs-and-bill-gates-what-happened-when-microsoft-saved-apple.html

Rather than:

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/08/29/steve-jobs-and-bill-gates-what-happened-when-microsoft-saved-apple.html#:~:text=In%20August%20of%201997%2C%20Gates,%24150%20million%20investment%20in%20Apple
For Catholicism it wasn't a "dress up" - it was the official religion of Rome in the last couple centuries, and the Catholic Church was the only main institution of (Western) Roman Empire surviving its fall.
> The Kubernetes way
to me, this translates into: a really complicated mess of manifests of layers-of-layers of fun, but hidden in an attempt to make it easy; but when it does work in the simplest forms, it works great.

if any lesson ive learned; let kubernetes manage only things that wont shoot yourself in the foot with; you wont know until you try :)
Ask HN: How can I future-proof myself
I am in my last year of school, aiming for a career in CS, this means I will likely enter the job market in ~5+ years.

With the contracting CS job market and the rise of AI, it seems like it will be a lot harder to get entry level positions, I have seen loads of posts on HN of people struggling to find jobs, even at salaries below the market rate.

Is there anything I should be doing to get ahead of the competition, apart from the obligatory "build a portfolio" & "leetcode", would getting into a better university help/ what about paid degree apprenticeships? Any particular uni courses I should do? I have a few large scale (fairly unique) applications that I have yet to publish/ make public, any advice on this?
Because your code might not need to care about the position you insert your A or B (left/right for Either), you also might not care whether it's an (encoding as) Either<A,B> or SomeoneElsesEither<A,B> and you also don't want to have to deal with flattening nested Either's as in the example.

These types are also called "set-theoretic" types as A|B means exactly the set of all values that can be typed as A or typed as B - note that this also induces a whole subtyping rule by set inclusion and this is in contrast to sum types where a value typed Either<A,B> can never be typed A or B - to move between them you need to apply extractors/match/constructors/(not sure of standard type theory nomenclature).

Implementation of these union types might still need additional tags and construction/matching/extraction underneath, but from a programming perspective there's less complexity as compared to involving an additional named type Either (or EitherOf3 and EitherOf4 and ...) and manually implementing set-theoretic laws.
I feel like there is a notion in your comment that I fit the stereotype of a radical left person, but I assure you I'm not. Of course, it's a good thing when people can find jobs instead of being unemployed.

> Lots of ways to criticize cooperation between countries in economic areas, call it exploitation

I'm referring to some of the examples on the Wiki page I linked. Many of them clearly involve one side exploiting the other.

> I'm just saying, mutual benefit does not equal exploitation.

Consider slavery. It may appear mutually beneficial on the surface, as one might argue that it's a choice between being a slave or starving or facing death. However, it's essential to acknowledge that such a relationship is deeply unjust and exploitative.
All versions will support infinite cardinality, including Edge and Community. That's a result of the database architecture.
A blob would not stop the attackers. To write a successful exploit they need to understand the compiled binary anyway.
This. Hell, in almost every org I've worked there's a guy who has helper scripts to do this automatically.
I think most people would prefer this over CSAM.
I'm trying to understand it too.

> We do not seek the permission of other governments

> these waters are also claimed by the State of California, who through its California Natural Resources Agency Pathways to 30x30: Accelerating Conservation of California’s Nature Report, support the concept of Indigenous Marine Stewardship

So I guess the State of California theoretically supports IMSAs, but does the state support this one? Does the state need to approve an IMSA for it to be official? Or are tribes independent enough that they can just declare it?
> but I don't think the people making those comments would be happy with the "fixed" more fraud resistant system either

Why do you assume this? Do you expect to fix fraudulent study results by mandating more studies?

Any way to add flexibility to drug certification must necessarily include some ongoing procedure to verify it works. So, it's even hard to come out with a faster process that doesn't reduce this problem (but yeah, if you make an effort, you can make one).
Reminds me of Postach.io, a service that turns notes in Evernote into blog posts. The example sites made with Montaigne are pretty basic, but they don't look too bad. Almost makes me wish I used a Mac and Apple Notes, just so I could try it.
"guaranteed to work for many years" if you don't need them calibrated I guess.

Also like I'm not sure? A lot of the discrete component and analog stuff on the old models is way more flimsy that the new system on a chip things on the signal path of the new instruments, specially for RF.

Plus if you need data logging it's not even worth to have the discussion on if older gear was better.
Commercial office real estate is another example that comes to mind.

TINA. Until suddenly, with COVID-19, there was an alternative.

And the real estate market is now (slowly) imploding.
"We do not seek the permission of other governments and can no longer wait to act to preserve and protect this culturally and ecologically important place"

This is SOP for California politics. CA jurisdictions have been ceding territory to Indian tribes for a while. This is purely an economically motivated cash grab layered under miles of politically correct double-speak. There is an indian tribe in Montana that has a massive coal mine that wanted to run a rail line to a port through the area that was shut down last year. This is possibly another strategy to do the same thing.
How so? Young people aren't still seeing the world in terms of Cold War imperialist atomic dick-swinging contests and appeasing the wrath of the Old Testament God. Young people don't see technology more recent than the rotary telephone as weird and scary. Young people aren't still wrapping their head around women being able to vote, black people walking in the front door or gays... existing.

Perhaps someone who's spent more than half of their life living in the pre-internet world and likely is confused and infuriated by everything that's happened in the world after their adolescence can't comprehend the reality of modernity well enough to have an informed say in the future. They probably still read the New York Times and think it matters.

They say progress only happens one funeral at a time, but these old bastards and their regressive ideas aren't dying fast enough.
The only Project Zero write up recently about android sandbox escapes appears to be on a different, ALSA based and Samsung specific vulnerability.
Indeed; Anglo-Norman French principally diverged after 1066.
But also, the patient paid for health insurance for the explicit reason that insurance provides protection against surprise costs, often paying thousands of dollars per year for it.

So fuck the patient? That's the current regime.
A comprehensive, precise, and pedantic branch of set theory pertaining to food categorization.
A close read of the statement suggests that this is more of a feel-good thing and not much to worry about. If those tribes get actual sovereignty over those waters, they’ll soon find them full of Chinese fishing trawlers.
I'm a little tired of all these "Google search used to be better" feel-pieces that don't do anything to substantiate the claim beyond relying on the author's vague sentiment.
Firefox has less than 3% user market share.

They can point all they want but it is basically insignificant in the overall scheme of things.
What if prevention is futile (human caused or not)? Wouldn't we be better off preparing (which seems practically possible) for the inevitable, rather than the futile exercise of burdening society with ESG, energy costs, etc
PS: I live in the UK, Tuition fees are capped and we have a generous student loan repayment system, the cost of uni is less of a factor than somewhere like the US
> "extend" it in a way that they don't release the source

Linux, thankfully, is GPL rather than MIT. Microsoft trying to defy Linux's license would result in the easiest lawsuit ever won by the EFF.
Do you have any other criticisms of the design of Signal?
I guess the three people who confused it in this very thread were just wrong to be confused.
Can confirm: I did this as a solo user of a personal API integration with Chase via Plaid. I answered honestly given the scope of what I was doing: for example, IIRC there was a question about whether all employees are background checked, and another about how we deal with terminated employee access. As the only user/employee/human, I could confidently say I background check all my employees and that if they’re terminated, their access will be promptly revoked :D
Why? Which parts of earth need relocating?
I think it's better to admit they actually are config, just a different kind of config that comes with an expiration date.

Accepting reality in this way means you'll design a config management system that lets you add feature flags with a required expiration date, and then notifies you when they're still in the system after the deadline.
What is yakihonne? Another blogging platform? Rather confusing to use.

Anyway, would have been nice for the article to link to Chez Scheme's project page, which seems to be this one:

https://github.com/cisco/ChezScheme

Also not clear why should folks use Chez? The article barely covered the why or what successful apps have been written in Chez.
AI privacy is increasingly a concern and laws and regulations are being created to govern how user data interacts with AI. We are building a community for compliance officers, privacy lawyers, policy makers, and AI researchers/practitioners to share latest information and interact in a way that provides mutual benefits.
The "mainstream" accepts many claims as true that can be objectively demonstrated to be false. Why should I have such confidence they're right about a theory like this that seems to be unfalsifiable?
I think slowly more minds are getting changed. Maybe a lot of people are still in the "Relax, it's no big deal!" (just see this comment section) mode, but it feels like little by little more people are thinking "Oh shit...".

Will it even be enough though, as a defeatist, my opinion is, it's all too late now. Which I acknowdlege is an easy way out... "Well it's too late to do anything, before I die, I'll have my steak medium rare please."
From PyTorch to Jax: The Evolution of Ergonomics in Scalable Programming
Hi all, my friend (https://twitter.com/yashsavani_) and I (https://twitter.com/eating_entropy) decided to turn our FB conversation into a substack essay. It actually turned out to be much better than we expected. Claude 2 is surprisingly good! Way better than GPT-4, which sounds like a high schooler. Will post some instructions on github later as to how to replicate.
Some people like to play games with semantics, but I say you lose the right if you can't get the basic details right...

You're saying "activity is not the framebuffer currently displaying", which is a completely nonsensical statement. The framebuffer does not change: the Surface Flinger is bound the the framebuffer and that's not changing during a rotation.

Tearing down the activity and creating a new one is literally blanking the screen as far as the activity is concerned: removing all views on the activity surface and adding brand new ones.

If you were to look at the activity in a view debugger frame by frame you'd get... a blank screen.

You could poll the WindowManager and there's... no views.

_

There's all sorts of ugly hacks to hide that fact, but at the end of the day supporting seamless transitions across rotations is something that dates back to iOS 3.

It's an artifact of the literal first Android phone that ended up causing pain for developers and instability for end users in perpetuity. Google simply is not product driven in a way that will ever allow them to match Apple. No UX obsessed company would have allowed that mess to go on as long as it has.
> There is wide spread recognition now that China controls too many aspects of supply chain, and that they are willing to use that as leverage to achieve geopolitical objectives.

When it comes to semiconductors, it's the exact opposite. The US controls the supply chain, and is weaponizing that control to a far greater extent than China has ever done with any sector.

If US policy were simply about reducing the US' own dependencies, the US would not be trying to drive Chinese semiconductor companies out of business with sanctions. US policy is about crippling the Chinese semiconductor industry, in order to be able to apply pressure on China on a whole range of other political and strategic issues.

Here's how the Brookings Institution study ends:

> If SME export controls successfully reduce China's chip fab capacity, the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea — the only remaining economies with significant near-state-of-the-art chip fab capacity — could coordinate on further, targeted end-use and end-user controls to advance the cause of human rights and global stability.

The plan is to make China entirely dependent on the US and its allies, and then to turn the screws to force China to make concessions on other issues. This is exactly the sort of supply-chain weaponization the US says China might theoretically engage in in the future.
Its structured this way because it was a reaction to the 08 crash and subsequent bailout of wall street. Seems to be the only reform that came out of that area, and measured against how much the banks chafe against the CFPB, I’d say it was working.

This would also challenge the federal reserve structure.
https://archive.ph/pDyh7
No other laptop manufacturer is going to offer you a repair that involves soldering, either. Everyone is just going to offer to replace the motherboard for a failure like that, and that motherboard contains all the most expensive components aside from the display. Nobody wants to lose money on the repairs, which is why soldering is right out and why a replacement motherboard is going to be over half the price of the machine before labor is thrown in. Your expectations were unrealistic.
Conway Can Divide by Three, but I Can’t [pdf]
Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code.

[0] https://sbcl.org
Congress could always change the laws that govern it. This just prevents a single executive from replacing the head and neutering the agency as the tides change
They state that they were unable to capture the follow-on stages of the Android chain, they only got the initial execution component.

Which means there’s missing a sandbox escape and privilege elevation bug.

Also yes while delivery here was apparently ISP level MiTM using lawful intercept capabilities, there’s no reason the exploit couldn’t be delivered as a 1click via a phishing link.
Show HN: Sumz.ai – Summarize Amazon Reviews with AI
I don't know what economic value this part of the ocean has. There aren't any fish left. We're currently in the planning stage of a wind farm here, but that's in deeper water outside of this zone.
Buyer beware: Sensation sells (as is portrayed in this news article). Competitors are one click or one setting away. Last I tried switching to DuckDuckGo things didn't go so well -- just overall subpar experience. Bing arguably is a bit better, but that too didn't satisfy, despite the super cool chat feature (deserves kudos for that!).
Always kubernetes, but I’ve heard some engineers with accents say it in a way that sounds like “kubernets”
Or you know SSHFP records + DNSSEC to verify hostkeys.

Which is something OpenSSH already supports.