skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's kind of an interesting way to handle the copyright issues. Not sure how effective it is as I suspect that can be bypassed by including a bunch of details about the artist but not the name.

> ... in the style of a famous Spanish artist who was born in 1881 and passed away in 1973 [and a bunch of other shit about Pablo Picasso]

(I also notice that this is more verbose than just "in the style of Pablo Picasso", which probably helps OpenAI's bottom line given costs associated with token counts. I doubt that's their intention with the change, just something of note. And, of course, a living example would be more applicable for copyright issues but the idea is still demonstrated.)
Sadly, list of elements in textproto, being repeated items, appear repeated, which isn’t great.
The left talks about stagnate wages, rising costs of college, and healthcare all the time. They talk about it as issues for everyone and not just men. Raising minimum wage helps everyone including men. Making college cheaper and easier to access helps everyone including men. Free healthcare helps everyone including men.
> And don't get me started on React's "put all the logic you want in our templating language that doesn't even target HTML5" elephant-footgun.

Sorry, but how is JSX a footgun? I have a lot of issues with React, but JSX doesn't even come close to making the list.
They are also surrounded by fluid that as ballast affects the density/volume/buoyancy/displacement(?) of the hull (and the inertia of the craft), which could be steel-plated [3d printed and/or pressure molded] biocomposite that lasts for spec years in seawater.
Maybe experiment with filters.

Also it could be 'fun' to swap out the LEDs?
> Also the YAML specification has all these features that nobody ever uses, because they’re really confusing, and hard, and you can include documents inside of other documents, with references and stuff

XML also has these?!? In fact I'd guess YAML was developed to mirror the feature set of XML while having nicer syntax for humans.
The fact that JSON doesn't support comments is so annoying, and I always thought that Douglas Crockford's rationale for this basically made no sense ("They can be misused!" - like, so what, nearly anything can be misused. So without support for comments e.g. in package.json files I have to do even worse hacky workaround bullshit like "__some_field_comment": "this is my comment"). There is of course jsonc and JSON5 but the fact that it's not supported everywhere means 10 years later we still can't write comments in package.json (there is https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/4482 and about a million related issues).
Bullshit. You can look up all works up for free online. What a sorry argument. Copyrighted means you can’t reproduce it, not not look at it.
I think I remember there being an organizational structure where the outer organization was a non-profit and they separated out what is now OpenAI into a for-profit subsidiary with a profit cap of 100x investment.

I still can't believe such a deal is legal.
Has anyone tried how different compression algorithms compare when doing NCD classification?

gzip first does LZ77 and then Huffman coding. ANS is a more modern alternative to Huffman coding that can achieve higher compression ratios than Huffman coding.
To be fair, that usually implies that you're made tired by the recipient's statement. Like if your child (hypothetical) was misbehaving and you told him "I'm getting tired of your disobedience" that child should expect that you mean you want them to stop being disobedient.
Corporations are not literally people in a legal sense. Corporations have some of the same rights as people in certain legal transactions because treating them as entities rather than each individual within a corporation separately is more convenient, and because to do otherwise would in some cases infringe upon the rights of the individual humans who make up the corporation (for example, corporations have a right to free speech because the individuals within that corporation have a right to free speech, and it would be impossible to deny free speech to corporations without also denying it to individuals.)

But systems of law are still capable of recognizing the distinction between the personhood of corporations and of people, just as they can recognize the difference between humans and AI even if AIs can be demonstrated to "learn" the way humans do. As always, context and nuance matter. Laws aren't written or decided upon based on pure logic or calculus but on what human beings want and consider to be in their self-interest.
Thank you to everyone on here for the suggestions and testing help :)
Is there any information on the resolution of the outputs?
This is indeed a new low in announcing something: „hey we have this awesome new model, which right now none can use, and we won’t tell you what is changed - except for it’s magically better. Oh and don’t ask for any technical details on the output you get… details are for n00bs“.
Llama was leaked which forced Facebook's hand.
Delivery that a drone could replace are maybe 1% of the traffic MAX.
Stable Diffusion is open and fully deterministic: a given version of SD+tools+seed shall always give exactly the same output. The model is available to everyone so you run it locally.

Which means there are countless (free) amazing tools around SD.

StableDiffusion is threatened by exactly nothing.

(others have mentioned that SD shall happily generate porn: I don't care about that... But I care about SD being the actual "open AI").
GitHub expands access to Copilot Chat to individual users
Art books are not free, they require paying a licensing fee to the rights holder.
Where is assault legal in the US?
Reminds me of the 500 mile email (2002): https://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html
I think it's popular because it's easy / free to set up and the friction is very low for new user, not because it's actually any good.

I think it's actually horrendous for things you want to use forums for. I don't remember using IRC in lieu of forums (did we?), why do we use Discord for the same?
The article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06557-9
You can melt down a lathe and it is quite hard to reassemble it, and even if you did reform the entire thing people would doubt if it is the same lathe.

Humans have had parts removed and reattached. With transplants components have been replaced entirely. There is a point at which you can destruct a machine from which it is impossible to reconstruct without getting into ship of Theseus issues. That point is different for different things.
Absolutely, we are really keen to support an encryption pattern. We are at the design phase, the current thinking is to have a hook enabling developers to provided their own encryption callback so that you can have unencrypted data in the local database. Essentially encrypting and decrypting, on and off the sync layer.
I like to set chatgpt to agressive, accusatory mode when I ask it technical questions. Its funnily angry for nothing but helps you anyway (while despising you).
But I see it discussed in left leaning media all the time. Topics like male suicide rates, loneliness, and social pressure against showing emotion come up over and over again.
1Blocker has been solid for me for a couple of years now. I use it on my i-devices and Macs.

https://1blocker.com/
Why "fortunately"? Seems a pretty standard thing to do.
Bananas are among the most popular fruit, as they are available year-round and travel well. They are also often used as a loss-leader. When I was at UCLA, the Whole Foods sold bananas at a very low price (39¢ a pound?), as a loss leader. Since I was a budget-conscious student, I would frequently just go in to buy bananas (it was 2 blocks from my apt, and on my walk home). But most shoppers who brave LA traffic to go to the grocery store would buy many other items, making the whole trip profitable for the store.
Well automatic changes would be even better I just assumed that a tool can't infer your intentions well enough for this one.
We are not sustainable
If "China, India, Iran, Israel, et al" have had AI for a while, the US didn't really "unleash" it, did they?
It's hard to make money if anyone can copy (and improve!) your work.
I'd actually say that the quality of the second dunking example is better in v2 instead of looking like some ArtStation output

“An expressive oil painting of a basketball player dunking, depicted as an explosion of a nebula.”
Just curious but did you try any bodged shielding?
Replacing the NCD

distances = [(compute_ncd(x1, x), label) for x, _, label in compressed_lengths]

with the Euclidean distance

distances = [(np.sqrt(np.sum(np.square(x1-x))), label) for x, _, label in compressed_lengths]

gives you +15% test accuracy and saves you a lot of compute.
Yeah, I follow a few YouTube channels where they bought (or rented very cheaply) a Japanese farm house in a rural part of the country.
> Because there's no way to control the seed, a direct comparison (using a before/after slider, for example) probably wouldn't make sense.

Even if it was the same seed, from my understanding Dalle3 would have to be just a further trained version of the same checkpoint to even resemble Dalle2's image. Like stable diffusion 1.4 vs 1.5 and 2.0 and 2.1 will make identifiably similar images, but 1.5 vs 2.1 vs SDXL won't look remotely similar.

Even more so because I'd wager they changed their encoder and/or decoder too.

* I think that if they generated something like a controlnet for guidance the same way in both models then they might be comparable but from my understanding Dalle2 doesn't work that way at all.

Comparisons would still be interesting though!
// There are approximately 25M millionaires in the US.

Really? Population of the US is like 350M. Is 7% of US population millionaires? Like, one of out every 14 people out there? I guess that's believable but counter-intuitive.
But OpenAI and Midjourney did train on their artwork without consent, and as a result artists are at risk of losing income from these models.
Neuroscience is a subset of biology, Psychology seems to be its own field off in liberal arts (maybe under Philosophy?), borrowing reputation from Neuroscience and Statistics while often refusing to adhere to the tenants of a real science.
I think that's the implication:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Petersburg_paradox
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)
Follow up question, is there a country this doesn't hold true in that otherwise has gender equality?
This would be useful for Google Workspaces if it respected all of the ACL's across shared google drives. To be able to ask questions about the document repository would be a nice thing to have. Currently Bard isn't supported for Workspace.
Firejail can also be a useful option, though no good if you're on Mac https://firejail.wordpress.com/

Uses the same Linux primitives as docker etc, but can be a bit more ergonomic for this use case
Bugs are animals.
Mungers' comment is part of a speculative forecast being made in a fictional story set in 1884, so it's not clear to me what relationship it's supposed to have to the real world.

But according to the link below, "3.1% of all beverages consumed around the world are Coca-Cola products" :

https://www.businessinsider.com/facts-about-coca-cola-2011-6

This is supported as follows:

> Of the 55 billion servings of all kinds of beverages drunk each day (other than water), 1.7 billion are Coca-Cola trademarked/licensed drinks.

> Source: Coca-Cola 2011 SEC Filings, Coca-Cola

So that 3.1% apparently excludes water and would be even smaller if water is counted.
Typically their model is regulatory capture.
How are they becoming a monopoly with midjourney and stable diffusion as strong opponents?
In my observation, to a first approximation, cable operators take off-the-shelf equipment, connect it, power it on, and bill customers for it. They don't really have the r&d capability to innovate and create new monitoring solutions quickly.

It might happen that an equipment manufacturer sees an opportunity and builds something, but then they have to go into a long sales cycles to convince operators to use it. Operators are in a duopoly situation in most places, so quality of service is kind of a secondary concern for them - customers may get annoyed, but as long as the competition is not vastly superior, few actually switch. It is not a market prone to innovation.
Have other models solved the problem with text in images or is that new here? That "I just feel so empty inside." one is so much better than anything I've seen before from generated images, and their video has some really high quality text in some of the images too.
Okay. Thanks
It's what is commonly called a baseline.
This looks impressive. Much more than even the Boston Dynamics demonstrations.

Flipping a pancake is extremely difficult because each pancake is different. I know that these videos must be cherry-picked but to be able to train a Robot to do this just by demonstrating feels like a massive leap.
I tend to think of "warning" as - "something unexpected happened, but it was handled safely"

And then "error" as - "things are not okay, a developer is going to need to intervene"

And errors then split roughly between "must be fixed sometime", and "must be fixed now/ASAP"
For human-maintained config, TOML is only "better" when the structure is so flat that it's almost indistinguishable from an INI file.

Anything more complex and it becomes one of the worst choices due to the confusing/unintuitive structure (especially nesting), on top of having less/worse library support.

YAML's structure is straightforward and readable by default, even for fairly complex files, and the major caveats are things like anchors or yes/no being booleans rather than the whitespace structure. I'd also argue some of the hate for YAML stems from things like helm that use the worst possible form of templating (raw string replacement).
> 2014

> and a ubiquitously used program that was supposed to protect information on the internet but didn’t.

I've come across this post before, and I'm 90% sure he's referring to OpenSSL and heartbleed here.
I'm able to observe that as well, I'm also able to observe that caring about that isn't necessary in most use cases and the convenience still wins.

I do branding and presentations all the time with graphics from Midjourney and rapidly iterate in that discord chat in various branches compiled in parallel all day. Make something as convenient, cheaper, private/offline, and faster and I'm there. Otherwise the ideology is irrelevant to me, and the unsaid secret is that that's true for most everyone else too.
Ok, fair enough. Amended to “there’s rarely need for name calling.”
Communities aren't profitable for corporations. You must be a rugged individual that does everything themselves (including buying our self help program and set of tools to make your life better).
You’re exaggerating a bit. He punched a producer for the show who was responsible for organising catering, it wasn’t a random waiter. A random waiter would be much worse. Who knows what relationship he had with that producer previous to the incident… He is (probably) an arsehole but let’s be accurate.
Those insights are things I've tried to bake into Booklet - for instance, a really generous free plan and no per-user pricing. Existing community platforms (like Circle) are not set up for bottoms-up adoption, so it ends up feeling like gross enterprise software.
json5 for complex config files is quite nice.
I disagree—I regularly find (and use) libraries that are built specifically for React and don't have a vanilla JS analog. As someone who uses Svelte on personal projects, I actually find this really frustrating and wish most of these libraries were just wrappers over some core functionality built without React.
Okay thanks for letting me know. I had assumed that now people are trying newer alternatives. What's your take on trying something to and using them in production?
> Well, when you say in your test file:

> “test this against Go 1.20”

> It interprets that as Go 1.2.

Without actual YAML (“test this against Go 1.20” YAML would interpret as the string “test this against Go 1.20”), its hard to know the actual complaint here, but it sounds like there was a YAML file with something like:

testTarget:
- language: Go
- version: 1.20

Where the tool interpreting expected a version string in “version”, but also accepted a number and implicitly converted the number to a version string. This is not a YAML problem, this is a “code that accepts and implicitly converts invalid data problem”. Its true that a schema and validating parser would help with this, and YAML doesn’t have a broadly supported standard schema language, but I bet the real problem here was that the underlying tool was written in JavaScript, as its the main popular language where even the most naive attempt to parse what you expect to be a string value would not fail if the value was actually a number.
It looks like you are focussing on business secrets and, while important, at least for me my main concern would be personal secrets on personal hardware that I am also doing side projects on.

A business today can reduce the blast radius by quite a lot with separate laptops ("customer/project laptop"), sample data and restricted/time limited access to production data.

In an ideal world no npm dependency could affect my online banking, icloud photo library or private messengers.
I used XSD templates once. It was really incredible, how useful it was. Nobody understood it, and rewrote it in JSON.
Most of this I really love. One thing seems a bit strange though...

Let's compare Svelte's and Solid's approach to nested reactivity. Both of them implement the same nested reactivity todo example:

Svelte: https://svelte-5-preview.vercel.app/docs/fine-grained-reacti...

Solid: https://www.solidjs.com/tutorial/stores_nested_reactivity?so...

In Solid, converting something to use nested reactivity is one step. In Svelte, it is two steps. And that second step is really verbose and annoying:

todos = [...todos, {
get done() { return done },
set done(value) { done = value },
get text() { return text },
set text(value) { text = value }
}];

Solid makes read and write segregation very simple and obvious. You don't need to manually make all these getters and setters.

It is nice that runes allows nested reactivity in Svelte, but it feels nicer to use in Solid.
My DSL internet would get incredibly slow at certain hours of the day when web traffic would be expected to be heavy (evening, as people are getting home, and around 10, as people are watching Netflix). AT&T refused to believe that the cause was congestion. No no, they said, it must be that there's a sprinkler that's going on at the same time each day, or a microwave that was causing a problem with your internet. Eventually they sent someone out and discovered that it was, in fact, a congested circuit that I was on. I couldn't believe they were so steadfast in claiming that it was some crazy-sounding external cause.
Please tell us where do you work so we know where not to apply.
George RR Martin and John Grisham among group of authors suing OpenAI
Have you tried recent versions of the Raspberry Pi Imager utility? It lets you build pre-configured Raspbian images, similar to what you're describing.
I agree. I am barely excited for DALL-E 3 because I know it's going to be run by OpenAI who have repeatedly made me dislike them more and more over the last year plus. My thoughts are: "Cool. Another closed system like MidJourney. Chat integration would be cool but it's still going to likely be crazy expensive per image versus infinite possibilities with Stable Diffusion."

Especially with DALL-E. Honestly I'd be more excited if MidJourney released something new. DALL-E was the first but, in my experience, the lower-quality option. It felt like a toy, MidJourney felt like a top-tier product akin to Photoshop Express on mobile, still limited but amazing results every time, and Stable Diffusion feels like photoshop allowing endless possibilities locally without restrictions except it's FREE!
From the post I originally replied to:

> It seems fair that if women claim more rights, then men can claim some of these "soft" rights too.

So it seems the argument is that because men prevent other men from exercising their rights, women deserve to be stripped of rights? Interesting logic. If men are stopping you from exercising your rights perhaps you should listen to the folks talking about toxic masculinity -- which is exactly what you're describing -- rather than trying to punish women.
Why do people always assume that freedom of expression only applies to one side?

He is free to hate the West while living in it. He's not going to prison for it (unlike he would in the countries he likes, ironically). He's not getting deported from the West despite claiming to hate the West or anything.

But I am also free to call him out on it. I have the same freedom, no? Why would he have the freedom to insult me (and you, since you said "our western") but not us to insult him back?

He can call me a hypocrite for West not being perfect and not solving all the problems of the world, and I can call him hypocrite for hating the West and its values yet still living in here for want of luxury. Is it a useful conversation? Not really, honestly, but it is fair.

But more importantly, look up paradox of tolerance and philosophy following from it. You can tolerate a lot, but tolerating too much is suicidal, because the intolerant will eventually take over. This is a general principle - welcoming people in the West is fine, for example, welcoming people who hate the West and want to destroy it is not.
> Which apps do you use actually it for?

neovim, mutt, tig, weechat

> That's what aliases are for (or you could rename the binary?)!

Unfortunately, it's not that simple on macOS for app bundles. The human readable name of the app bundle really doesn't matter that much to the operating system -- it's the contents of Info.plist that matter. In order to have a separate app that can be Cmd+Tab'd to, you have to have a separate app bundle, separate app bundle identifier, etc. There's really not a way around it on macOS that I've seen.

(And to be clear, aliases do work on the command line. I'm talking specifically about GUI apps - which is my primary method of separating my different activities. Terminal emulator tabs are not good enough.)

This also doesn't solve the performance problems with any of the various GUI applications, nor does it solve my problem for other applications that I want to run.

> By the way, do you know the app https://github.com/sveinbjornt/Platypus that can generate app bundles on a Mac?

I do! I tried this route first, but it falls apart when you start a GUI application from the script that you supply to platypus. If your script is e.g. `wezterm start`, it'll just start up another instance of a wezterm-branded GUI app in addition to the wrapper app that Platypus spits out.
all (and i mean all 6) convenience stores around me have a separate "good humor" chest freezer in the front, directly adjacent to the entrance, and the rest of the ice cream (here it's blue bell invariably) is in a vertical case in the rear of the store. I can go take pictures, if HN doesn't believe the pervasiveness of this sort of thing!
"Better" is a loaded word. Behind it there is a lot of criteria, priorities, ways to measure, subjetivity and more. Your context for that word may be different than mine.
Cynical monikers applied to corporations and/or brand names are not meant to be funny, at all. They are often useful warning signs, meant to demonstrate corporate deviousness over time.