skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> In terms of ecosystem loss, it seems to me that concentrating most calorie production onto the smallest amount of land makes sense.

Incorrect. Agroforestry is the practice of integrating livestock and orchards. The orchard is designed to serve as the basis for an extended ecosystem. Trees provide shade for fowl, sheep and small cows and help limit swale evaporation. Fallen fruits attract a wide variety of animals and birds, providing prey for cats, hawks and owls. Systems like this sustainably produce a high quantity and quality of food per acre while encouraging diversity and natural beauty, at the cost of being less accessible to automated farm machinery. The best case scenario for sustainability and diversity would be if everyone lived in small communities with shared food forests, eating mostly locally grown food.
hey man this looks interesting! My Magic days are long over, but I still figured I'd give some input.
This day and age wouldn't a value-add from such marketplace be the validation of authenticity?
Kind of like what Ebay or StockX are doing?
Don’t really agree with your assertion, but I imagine that blue collar work has much higher rates of self employment, compared to white collar work.
Tofu in particular is an amazing, versatile ingredient with so many varieties and ways to prepare it (in western countries we barely scratch the surface)—if all you do with tofu is try to approximate meat, you're wasting its full potential!
The making of a potato is subsidized from taxes so it can be sold for "cheap".

There is no subsidies for making chips, and it is "a treat" so there is not all that much reason to make it cheap aside from competition
Sadly any diary alternatives are at best "meh"...
You don't see the point in constantly changing hardware, but you have no problem with changing subject, I see. I would encourage you to give Zero Days a watch sometime
We momentarily are hiding out of stock while we adjust some things to this traffic spike. Normally you'd see exactly that.
> I don’t recall why I had docker installed, and was happy to remove it. Never liked docker

Some people not only like it, but require it for their work - seems like an odd prerequisite.
Sadly this is the case in many politically charged discussions here and it doesn't look like much is being done about it. In a submission about banning XL bully dogs in the UK opinions that went against one particularly active commenter were instantly down-voted and flagged. And that submission wasn't even popular. Just brigaded hard.
I'm just an onlooker here, but you have been misunderstanding/misusing the word "infer" in this thread.

So let's put that word aside and focus on understanding what the person above you is trying to communicate.

They made an accusation against Churchill, and you responded with a defense of Britain. This reveals that you misinterpreted their comment. They wish to correct your musunderstanding and make it clear that they were not talking about Britain, only Churchill.
In case you were wondering why you were downvoted, the 4th paragraph of the main link covers all this.
I love the AI space, but I wonder if the internet comparison is valid? Isn't it more like the cloud or mobile?

Most apps will have AI of some sort. It's an infrastructure serving the problem. It isn't a completely new distribution medium, consumption mechanism.
Are these issues true for Podman as well? Podman's drop-in ability vs. Docker seems impressive so far for me, but I have yet to really stretch it.
Alpha cards have been heavily favored by collectors as Hasbro has attempted to create artificial scarcity.
Lead shot is typically spherical without any trimming from a larger piece. The traditional method is called a shot tower, and involves dropping molten lead so it forms small drops that cool as they fall, until they impact into a water bath. This works because drops of liquid are spherical below a certain size dependent on the material. The classic depiction of a rain drop is entirely false.
so it definitely wont involve ML and bitcoin inevitably right
Well if you want your fruits without worms in it, you have to.

I remember from my life at farm that even just spraying it few days too late basically "ruined" a lot of fruit
Is there a good comic explanation for TCP/UDP like the "How https works comic" - perhaps someone knows?
Indeed it does, and is was covered in José's conference talk
I think the Doctorowists would say that interoperable shit is still shit. If they want social media with no user cost, no ads, and no tracking of any kind... that boxes them into a very small design space.
Makes you better at practicing to get more money out of anxious VCs though
> while also being dramatically better for the environment?

[citation very fucking much needed]
> cut "companies" out entirely.

As written, that is probably not possible. As long as people don't want to manage their own services someone will offer to do it for them (for some form of compensation) , and one of the corporate forms is the natural way to structure that, particularly in the presence of liability laws.

I expect to eventually see a mastodon service that does do ads as I think the current system is unsustainable with current attitudes. I have no idea how they'll make ads acceptable, but I have faith in the creativity of people looking to make a steady buck. Once they have the extra income, that will make it less likely to collapse than its peers, so evolution will kick in and many will do whatever it is that stabilized the income.
> A friend of mine in the apple business says you get 4 bad years in a row and then one great year to cover the 4 bad ones and make an overall profit. The weather is the main variable that can't be controlled.

From my memory the years where crops were unusually high were also ones where price was shit... because everyone else nearby also had a good crop
The OP is wrong, log levels are very valuable if you leverage them.

Here's a classic problem as an illustration:
The storage cost of your logs is really prohibitive. You would like to cut out some of your logs from storage but cannot lower retention below some threshold (say 2 weeks maybe). For this example, assume that tracing is also enabled and every log has a traceId

A good answer is to run a compaction job that inspects each trace. If it contains an error preserve it. Remove X% of all other traces.

Log levels make the ergonomics for this excellent and it can save millions of dollars a year at sufficient scale.
Chips, along with cereal, are an interesting case where the normal price is crazy high but then they go on sale for a fraction of that with extreme frequency.

There's a store near me that has had a particular $5 chip brand on sale for $2 for well over a year. For cereal, I just go to the cereal aisle and take my pick from the substantial range of cereals that are 50% off at any given time. You're only paying full price if you're picky and insist on one specific item, which to be fair maybe a lot of people are like that.

I'm sure the sales are loss leaders to get people in the store, but I have to wonder if the people who pay $5 are to some extent subsidizing the people who buy them for $2. Most other categories of goods don't seem to go on sale with such frequency or with such deep discounts.
Possibly. Orano(ex Areva) operates there as well.

But France depends/ was depending mainly on uranium from Kazakhstan, Niger and Uzbekistan.
30 years ago (within that generation-or-two span), at least here in the parts of the US I was in around that time, blackberries and lots of other stuff were both expensive, and only available seasonally. You could get canned year-round, not fresh.
I suspect a common reason would be for a classic car or motorcycle.
You don't need to use JSX. Stencil integrates with other frameworks such as Vue or Ember: https://stenciljs.com/docs/overview
Portable Data Stack
There are chopping marks and striations that show the notches were worked with tools. It’s only two logs so I can’t jump to structure but it’s wood that was worked to lock together for some purpose. Maybe structure is meant in the more general sense?
When I read "Dead Neuron" I definitely associated it with ReLUs.

It's claimed that this tendency to create dead neurons has a regularizing effect, but frankly I don't buy that.

Anecdotally, I've always had better results with Leaky ReLUs or Mish.
Both of my kids are classical music students. With extremely rare exceptions, everybody seems to use an iPad, latest and biggest model, with a page turning pedal. Virtually all classical material has been scanned or digitized. Not so in my world, jazz. My band's charts are still all on paper.

Why the iPad? There may be an aspect of "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM." If your iPad fails or runs out of battery (it happens), other people will be sympathetic. If you bring something "weird" and it fails, it will be because you tried to cheap out on something weird, and it's your fault.

You'll get less screen area than you might expect unless the screen has the same aspect ratio as typical 8.5x11. I own a 10" tablet that's sufficient for reading lead sheets (melody plus chord changes) but am seldom motivated to actually use it. I already know most of the standards that are likely to be called on a gig.
Fair or not, and whatever the implications of depending on ads, free access is just table stakes. Period.

But putting aside the mental barrier that something that's always been free should now cost money.

I could maybe have been convinced to pay a small amount for access to 2010-2015 era Twitter.

The 2015-Elon era would have been a harder sell. The experience was going downhill before the acquisition. Not his fault. And also we'd become less naive about the effect of social media on our lives and on society. Being asked to pay would have triggered a reexamination of the necessity of social networking in my life that should have happened around then anyway.

But the idea of paying for what Twitter has turned into post-acquisition? Ask me again next week when I stop laughing.
There’s a wonderful novella by Ed Chiang called “the lifecycle of software objects” that addresses your thoughts exactly. Highly recommended.
I'm religious about never, ever interrupting the user. It's unfortunate that way too many other software developers consider it acceptable. No, I don't care about your updates and onboarding and ToS changes, I opened your app with one concrete goal in mind and you're getting in my f***ing way. You aren't being helpful a tiniest bit.

If you need to inform the user about something, put a banner at the top of the screen. Or show an icon with a badge on it. Anything that doesn't require immediate attention and a context switch. Trust me, none of your stuff is so critical that the user needs to be interrupted.
"Humans and mice share many common genetic features and by examining the physiology, anatomy and metabolism of a mouse, scientists can gain a valuable insight into how humans function." https://www.yourgenome.org/facts/why-use-the-mouse-in-resear...
Yeah, that's right. Though the only moat GPT wrappers can have in the long term is good customer service and distribution. They are already getting users now. The question is will they maintain the users' loyalty in the long run?

If they nail this, then I think we have winners!
YouTube channels / people who might have some ideas for a new Climate Corps program:

Andrew Millison: https://youtube.com/@amillison

Practical Engineering: https://youtube.com/@PracticalEngineeringChannel

Dr Elaine Ingham: https://youtube.com/@soilfoodwebschool

Wranglerstar: "How the US Forest Service splits firewood"
https://youtube.com/shorts/LgiIZBlRL1U?si=nEP3hYxBd9sxFwlk USFS RED bag https://youtube.com/watch?v=JBVX-KWsJ6I&si=BQSPctpVTN6Ynn-Z

"xPrize Wildfire – $11M Prize Competition": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35657181 https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/#story-35657181
No wonder that many people find social interactions to be draining.

I am perfectly okay with putting on the usual polite/fake persona when I'm in a good headspace. When I'm not though I just want to avoid those interactions as much as I can.
Strada isn’t dependent on Rails, but Turbo.
it seems like the ones responsible for the wrongdoing are the ones being blamed, what makes you find that so incredible?
That's not the right question to ask. You can construct all sorts of hypotheticals or alternative answers but all of that is meaningless until someone actually builds it.
We don’t know that it’s purely compulsion, do we? Perhaps they know that still pools of water are best for survival so they’re motivated to prevent water from running away. The level of compulsion could be more sophisticated than we imagine. This seems to be true with many mammals. Not long ago in North America, it wasn’t uncommon to think of dogs as meat-headed automatons. Today it’s common to recognize that they have emotions and personalities much like we do, and there’s little evidence to suggest otherwise. I’m not convinced beavers are like giant fruit flies trying to plug holes.
The US will switch to metric when we have 10 months in a year, 10 days in a week, 100 (or 1000) days in a year, 10 hours in a day, and 100 seconds in a minute.

Seriously, one thing that I've realized living in a country where metric went over like a loud fart in church is that metric only works when units are arbitrary; but many times we need to measure things that are not arbitrary.
Meticulous: An FPGA-Based Main Memory Emulator for System Software Studies
Which was discussed yesterday: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37576633>

(It's an HN perennial.)
But don't you see — it's for the greater good! They can only give you the best user experience if you update to the latest version of iOS!
We live in an amazing country. Presumably some of the <0 folks are recent grads with student debt etc rather than the classical poor as well.
That's a fantastical explanation for humans just fetishizing stimuli as being real (map vs. territory). Which is a close enough approximation for most practical purposes.
Good Point. There is ofc tons of criminal youtubers making money.

YouTube don't care as long as it's not publicly known. Hence the community part I suppose?

It's no moral high ground but it's not illogical from that perspective.
Why they have those posts as text file?
Have You ever seen the movie "The Fly?"
It'll be even worse, because most non-shit apps will stick with Apple's store, so the third party stores will (for the most part) _only_ have low quality apps.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/23/politics/chelsea-manning-soli...
AGI will claim the novelty of ‘innovation’ from humans too
For $500 you get a resolution of 2.5K per eye. People who've used HMDs to mirror their desktop GUIs, is that enough for all-day "professional" work?
Yeah scalar replacement is very conservative and things that a human can easily tell don’t escape the jit cannot.

This is 2ish years old but has a lot of detail on what escape analysis can and cannot see:

https://gist.github.com/JohnTortugo/c2607821202634a6509ec3c3...
Dole makes $1.2 billion a year EBITDA.

https://www.doleplc.com/investor-relations/news/ir-news-deta...
I never used Meta. Discussion platforms I use are HN, reddit, ocassionaly twitter/mastodon and online chats, like mattermost or discord.

Maybe I'm currently the minority, but even now it's not true that entirety of online discussion is controlled by Meta.
Misleading title, the article body goes on to say that a different rule other people came up with, that was an assumption based on Leonardo da Vinci's rule, is the one that's been disproven. Says nothing about his actual rule.
> for you to be able to use Svelte's reactivity inside .js/.ts files, since that's one of the things people have been crying out for since we released Svelte 3

I can't find an issue for that among top 50 open issues on Svelte's GitHub repo. I've also been a member of Svelte's Discord server for years and do occasionally hang out there, I haven't seen people "crying out" for this at all.

On the other hand, there are things like `<style module>` or `forward:class`, etc. that people have ACTUALLY been crying out for (literally one of the most upvoted issues in the repo) which haven't been addressed at all.
Yeah it's crazy. My late dad's old farm just had basically a big room that had concrete crating above a hole in soil (I believe it was to just keep it cool in the warmer months) and they could be stored from autumn to spring. No AC of any sort, just a small furnace to give off a bit of heat when winter gets really cold and some big fans for forced ventilation.
If the artist stole the artbook from a shop, the problem is not that they are using it as a reference; the problem is that they stole it. Likewise if they download the pdf from a pirate site. It is a separate, different problem. You can tell because there would still be a problem even if they didn't then go on to produce art, or read it at all.

If, however, the rights holder chooses to just give them away; or, y'know, puts them on their own website for anyone to look at - there is then no license fee to be paid for looking.

Note that this still does not mean someone can make copies and sell them. That's a separate right. But using such materials as a reference is just fine, and people do this all the time.
Please don't take HN threads into generic ideological battle. I'm sure that wasn't your intention and also that the title is provocative in that direction, but when the topic is inflammatory, it takes a conscious effort not to feed flamewar. We ended up with a bad one here and your comment was the root of it.

"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."

"Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
> But Python doesn't have any concept of a monad, so what would do-notation even be in Python?

It could work on the same things that Python's current list comprehensions work on. I'm just suggesting a different syntax. Comprehensions in Haskell originally worked for all monads too.

> And who is the "everyone" using do-notation? I don't see any analogous syntax in Lua, Javascript, Ruby, or Perl.

I meant that within Haskell, everyone uses do notation rather than comprehensions.

> The existing syntax is meant to mirror the syntax of a nested for loop. I agree that maybe it's confusing, but if you want to go from a multi-for comprehension to an actual nested for loop, then you don't have to invert the order.

You have to invert half of it, which I find more confusing than having to completely invert it. do-notation style syntax (e.g. Scala-style for/yield) would keep the order completely aligned.
Intelligence in general seems to be a spectrum for animals. Future AGI may be on an entirely different spectrum which isn't directly comparable. We won't know until someone actually builds one and we have a chance to evaluate it.
The commission will then analyze that report. It's a proactive back-and-forth, not rubber-stamping.
It wasn't radar, it was just a camera feed that activated when I put it in reverse.
FYI, even in the most recent Java (21) LTS release this is flagged as an "early access" feature so you're unlikely to see production applications using it yet.
> white male, no family/kids, bicycle in the profile picture. Usually they are young

My wife with 2 kids that has no twitter account also hates cars. You just don't hear from her because you don't go to the same places she does. The same probably goes for everyone else outside the demographic you're describing.
> So let me get this straight. You've used Kafka once, RabbitMQ never

Not true, and some also for the rest of your snotty comment, I'd have a response but it's best not to engage trolls. Another commenter answered the question I had. Good luck.

Also, did you register solely to make this comment? Pretty sad display, really.
It looks like this is from the primary source (IAEA) and the submission is an almost verbatim copy. However, it's a similarly short snippet.

Here is another article including the illustrations copied on the blog post which has more detail:

IAEA How to Control Insect Pests Using Radiation
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/how-to-control-insect-p...
Yes, in the same way as a work-out in the gym has dignity and value. In the gym you're just moving some metal chunks up and down, but that work has tremendous physical and mental effects on the person doing it.
On the homepage clicking through to each set and there’s no indication anything is happening. Back button is pretty unresponsive as well.
Cham Des Bondons
Feels like if this takes off there'll be an opportunity for arbitrage between TCGPlayer and Mana Pool. I see e.g. All Will Be One is $11.67 on TCGPlayer and $12.40 on Mana Pool. Though I haven't done the math to see what kind of fees there are.
I dimly recall it being noticed at the time but I suspect it was really a convenient side effect ie a contributory factor and not the primary reason.

I think "branding" is far more likely. google.com is the brand and a single entry point landing on search which then points you at what you "need". Note how you search and can click on the buttons underneath the bar to move into images, maps etc. Maps is just another specialized form of search.
I was a huge supporter of UBI for a while, but now I think money is going to become kind of meaningless at some point (the more we print the less it's worth, and UBI policies would struggle to keep up with the inflation they drive)

I'm leaning more towards socialized housing, food, health care, and public transporation now, at least for the basics.

Everyone should be able to at least meet their minimal basic needs without depending on their economic relevance (which isn't a given for many people over the next 100 years). People who want more than the essentials (a house with larger bedrooms, equipment for their hobbies, travel accommodations) can find paid work in positions that still require a human touch.

And if there aren't enough jobs available for everyone who wants one, then start reducing the standard work week from 40 hours, until everyone who wants can find work.
> https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1208

Ah, it's apparently a quantum-hardened variant of AES! But AES-256 is inherently quantum-hard and much better understood at this point. In other words, AES is really not the security bottleneck against quantum adversaries.

> I'm not too familiar with the details of how Signal's initial key exchange works, other than that from a user experience point of view it relies on people having shared phone numbers in at least one direction. So in practice this is kind of similar to the sharing of a one time password.

A user's phone number is public information; you can't use that as the password in a PAKE.

Signal has basically two ways of exchanging keys: Unauthenticated (in which case you trust Signal's service to really provide you your contact's keys, and not their own, which would allow them to MITM your chats), and "safety number comparison", for which you have to manually compare a short numerical string with each contact over a trusted channel (ideally in person). It's less convenient, but removes Signal's servers from the set of entities you need to trust.

Theoretically Signal could also offer a PAKE option to interactively authenticate a new contact remotely (if you do indeed have a shared password), but that's probably not easy to do in a way that's not prone to social engineering attacks, since you don't have a channel to communicate about what your password should be. (Remember that you don't trust the contact yet; an attacker could pick a password hint that they know the answer to as well!)