skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>before anyone else did

Not disputing your claim per se, but Google had a project called Daydream back at least as early as 2017 (though seems earlier) and rolled that into Area 120 projects. They canned it at some point in 2021 I believe.

Whereas SimulaVR seems to have started working on this in 2018 per their YC app (but perhaps earlier?) https://github.com/SimulaVR/Simula/wiki/YCW19-Application
I agree. It's not just that though, part of what gives the powerful country it's power is the belief from other countries that they won't back down when an aggressor comes knocking. The US can't really not get involved because even not getting involved is a sign of weakness/defeat. Dalio mentions this a bit in the video in the original comment.

The question it comes down to is how many fronts can they effectively fight on? If the US is fighting in the Ukraine trenches, the Taiwan strait and the Korean border, how much do they have left over for the other places? Even stuff we take for granted such as shipping goods around the world easily because of the general lack of piracy goes out of the window because you need the warships that were policing the shipping routes for the war effort.
It still does for regular loops right?
That's not how any of this works.

1. YouTube can show ads BETWEEN videos and keep 100% of the money.

2. YouTube runs ads WITHIN videos if owner "monetizes", and shares the profit.

3. Creators run "promotions" within their videos and keep 100% of the money.

They only stopped #2. Both YouTube and Brand are still both making money off brands videos on YouTube.
I believe this is about protecting the ecosystem. YT has basically stopped ads from playing on his content…no advertiser wants to be associated with him right now. If YT didn’t take this action, it’s likely advertisers would pull back on spend because they don’t want to risk being seen along side his content.

YouTube, afaik, doesn’t just let advertisers blacklist individual channels.
I imagine subsequent conversations included some extremely smug 'I told you so' moments.
It simply seems disingenuous to talk about how this was an issue in JS and then go on to say that Go devs have a "stance against PLT". JS is not renowned for being an exemplar of PLT, so why would the Go developers use it as a reference point for their own design? JavaScript can't even take the address of a variable - which is the underlying problem here.

In any case - I seem to remember that they discussed the rationale for the original decision in the release notes for go 1.21, along with additional context.

For whatever it's worth, I don't see any evidence that Go is specifically antagonistic to programming language theory at all - the existence of first-class constructs like channels and closures suggests otherwise. There are always costs and tradeoffs involved in adopting certain theoretical paradigms, and PLT is subject to fashion as much as any other endeavour.

Go focusses on simplicity, and when talking about simplicity I really like this quote from Dijkstra:

"Simplicity requires hard work to be obtained and education for its appreciation, and complexity sells much better.” [0]

I think Go works hard to be simple, and sometimes that comes across as being simplistic. Indeed, I was sceptical of Go when I set out to learn it, but having spent enough time with it to consider myself a professional Go developer, I also find that enjoy coding more than I have for many years, `err != nil` notwithstanding.

[0] https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD10xx/E...
I wouldn’t have believed you until I started looking into how spheres are made with various materials. All of them require immense amounts of iterations from rough cutting to polishing. Generally they are formed by reducing from a larger piece of material, sometimes inflated. It is never a cheap process to make a sphere and against nature is to achieve it. In the collection of gravities the earth and its inhabitants are subject to, straight lines are rare. A perfect sphere demands infinite straight lines of equal length from one point in space and for those to persist over time. A tall order for mere matter. Buckyballs are good enough for me.
How does it relate to misogyny if you don't mind me asking?
We're still playing with our pricing.

10$ joining fees and a 3.5% markup on adding funds is the current business plan.

We'll observe customer usage over the next 3-6 months and figure out if fixed fee subscriptions can be cheaper.

> Also how did you build a legal structure to allow this ?

We've partnered with Transcorp International Limited to operate the Cheq app in India. They are an RBI approved AD2 and PPI license holder. Customer funds are parked in an escrow account with them until utilized via the UPI network.

This is also why Cheq physical verification can happen only at Transcorp branches currently.

You can think of Cheq as a technology platform using Transcorp as our banking partner.

Or Transcorp, as a financial services firm, using Cheq as its technology partner.
The government may offer them "advice" now and then as well. If I was running the American regime, I'd want him deplatformed due to his content.
All the more reason to use SVGs! SVG has <circle> and <ellipse> elements.
At this point I can't tell if Musk sustained a brain injury/infection at some recent date, or he had a handler that was keeping him from touching pointy things and they quit or he fired them and now we're getting unfiltered Musk all day every day.
Can't have enough of this story. Learned 'unites' command too.
Agreed. When building projects or POC I always default to Strapi and Remix. Because it allows me to build things fast.
In reality, punishment is not the same as suffering. People can suffer without an external punishment.
Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense
"Enough" depends on the purpose, right? Are there enough studies to credibly worry? Seems fair to say there is.

Are there enough studies to stop further study? Not a chance, as you say.

But the rewards are likely to be clarity of details, not reversals of concerns.
Further to my point that even sights held up as "free speech zones" would be functionally broken without any moderation.
It does look like the release date was pushed back a week, about a month ago.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/https://staind.l...

https://www.theprp.com/2023/08/22/news/staind-premiere-their... (August 23)

>Citing production delays, Staind have now announced that their new album “Confessions Of The Fallen” will arrive a week later than intended. That full-length outing will now be available on September 22nd.
There are a bunch of general reasons:

- job opportunities for domestic employees

- knowledge concentration that might otherwise disappear (i.e. brain drain) and lessen the quality of domestic education

- economic effects, more so if you subscribe to trickle down economics and take into account potential loss of jobs, which means loss of pay and loss of income tax and loss of spending elsewhere etc.

- prestige that can be useful for diplomatic purposes

On top of that there could also be cultural or country specific reasons.

In collectivist cultures the prestige can translate into national pride or the company and its brands can be part of the national identity.

Often in those countries the legacy of a company can also be important.
Companies that are decades, centuries or even thousands of years old are held in high regard.

This can go so far that taking over your parent’s hundreds year old family business making matcha can be more prestigious than being, say, a doctor or lawyer.

The cultural driven values are hard to explain if you’re not a part of it, but that doesn’t make them less valid for those people.

It’s how most Americans value freedom of speech above all else, taking the bad (hate speech) with the good despite non-Americans not necessarily understanding it.
Or the reverse, how most Europeans value banning hate speech, taking the bad (risking further restrictions) with the good, despite most Americans not understanding it b

Both have a cultural historical context, but in isolation without it it’s something that an outsider might not understand.
Doesn’t go vet complain about your code? I’m not at my computer right now so can’t check.
The value your privacy like the wolf values your mutton
For me it doesn't work on Chrome android.

As soon as I want to select something and move my finger slightly, the menu disappears, although I am still with my finger on the button
Perhaps my point wasn’t clear. Work is power. It’s not the only kind of power (military is another one) but it’s a kind of power. There’s leverage from being able to withdraw that labor, and collective leverage from a class of people doing that.

The situation I’m describing is a concentrated alignment of military power and economic power. Those who own the machines will also have the backing of the State, which has a legal monopoly on violence.

Almost everyone will be excluded from this ruling class, and will be at the mercy of them.

It’s happened before. Many of the Luddite leaders were publicly executed after destroying factory machines.
13.5.2 has /usr/bin/python3 (it’s 3.9.6) but not python2 or just python. Not sure when they changed, and YMMV with Homebrew.
> They’re some of the most peace loving people on planet earth

Sorry, but the burden of proof is on you. Please provide a study, or serious statistics proving your point.
The Story of Mr O’s Circle (2021)
Because “double insulation” is much more common here and is deemed sufficient enough. A/Cs and fridges are usually the only appliances which needs a ground connection. For those, we have sockets that has a hidden screw-in ground tap.

I can still find unsafe/bothersome exceptions though. For example, a lot of rice cookers doesn’t really seem to be “double insulated” but they still have two-pronged plugs. Another is custom-built PCs. You basically need to strategically place your PC near a socket which you usually use for your A/C just to have that ground connection.
I want to work remotely because there is great cost in going to the office on many fronts: wasted time, energy, and the psychic cost of offices being an unpleasant place where it's difficult to work.

Coupled with the fact that there is very little benefit to being in the office, the results of the equation couldn't be more clear.
On Android the menu disappears a soon as I move my finger on the button even without leaving the button.
> By all accounts that was caused by the Ukraine invasion rather than the assassination.

It's not either/or, it's both.

The counter example is USA (I'm american). USA had such a "good guy" track record post WWII that we invaded numerous countries and fucked around all over the world and we didn't get coalition'ed against.
I've done a lot of work with gestural/interactive motion like this.

One area that people tend to make naive mistakes in motion design is directly driving the playhead with something like drag distance. For instance, if you drag down on the home screen of Android, stop, and hold; you can see the transparency of the homescreen icons and of the Quick Settings tiles are both controlled by how far you've dragged. The opacity of those icons is determined by your arbitrary drag distance, instead of something more meaningful (like which direction the transition will animate when you let go).

One of the nice aspects of this menu is that it's always clear which item is active. You can't drag to an indeterminant state between two items.
Does this account for the fact that AI cannot write or draw without relying on human written or drawn samples?
Instacart shares jump 43% in grocery delivery business’s Nasdaq debut
I see Frysk is on there. That game is wild.
I think this is the key point. Sending columns through Belgium to try to envelop Paris from the north wasn't a particularly faithful recreation of Hannibal's battlefield-scale double envelopment

It was however the logical way to attack France from Germany given the geography. WWII generals, who weren't as obsessed with Cannae as Schlieffen, but were well aware the "Schlieffen Plan" was a failure, took the same route with better mobility and logistics and succeeded.
I run the https://webri.ng/ platform, which got a mention in the article. It provides a simple platform for managing your own webrings, without any extra bells and whistles. It's in bad need of a UI overhaul, but otherwise everything is going well!
And iOS as it seems not to work on Chrome on Android.
unless they changed things, last year YT made it impossible to not display ads on your videos even if you wanted to let people watch your videos without ads
By the definition of "punish" that you are implicitly using, private businesses in America used to be able to punish people for anything ("we reserve the right to refuse service to anybody"). Now there are certain things they cannot punish people for (e.g. being black). Are you suggesting that the time has come to mandate that companies may not discriminate against customers for other reasons as well?
That appears to be a rendering/conversion artifact since PDF also supports 360° arcs. My question is, mathematically, is a 360° arc not a circle? (I understand that once a circle is rendered or physically manifested, it's an approximation.)
If your child is putting part of the playground into their mouth, you are doing it wrong, not the playground.

And I think you misread; I said it was one of the primary responsibilities of a parent to keep toxic things out of your child's mouth.
It has been a while, but yes, there were a lot of them and I forget most. It made it kinda pointless to me that the language was "easy" when the code felt so brittle (Null pointers...really?).

One weird thing that always goofed me up was that slices are passed by value but maps by reference. Always made it confusing how to pass them for serialization/deserialization. The compiler didn't complain it just panicked. Seemed like something the type system should catch.
Not sure about free markets, but the Bible literally has Jesus telling poor people to sell their stuff until they can buy a sword for self-defense: https://www.bibleref.com/Luke/22/Luke-22-36.html
I think Pinot has more focus on real-time stuff, the ones you listed would be more in the data warehouse category
Glebe Math Teacher Circles the Web (2007)
I think there's a Bluey episode about not eating the recycled tires on the playground...
Could an “untrained” human being write or draw, alone, without samples?
You could say much of the same about email. Especially given that more spam is sent than legit.

ref: https://dataprot.net/statistics/spam-statistics/
Hey, answering the questions below

1) https://transcorpint.com/find-us => You can verify yourself at any of these centers across India.

We'll improve the site to directly point customers to appropriate verification centers (thanks for pointing this out)

2) OCI holders are accepted as well. Only your passport and OCI card are required

3) Add funds facility is instantenous. And is available in the app once you've finished the verification. You'll be able to add funds via any card, and instantly receive funds in your Cheq wallet for spending.
Those samples already existed and thus don't cost anything.
Financial Modeling World Cup – Sample Cases
Not just social media. Stripe and Square have similar wiggle-room and it's a demonization felt pretty directly. Amazon, Etsy and others - their policies give room to pick and choose winners - and change policy on a whim - and apply it inconsistently.

Corporate Overlords don't have to engage on Rights - it's all in the Privilege realm.
FoundationDB vs. QuestDB vs. SurrealDB Comparison
Did you learn to write or draw without studying the samples of artists and authors before you?
DB-Engines – Knowledge Base of Relational and NoSQL Database Management Systems
> The majority of all circulating coins are stored in addresses which have been reused.

Interesting, do you have any statistics on that? But I guess with large exchange wallets, it makes sense.

> only have 80 bits of security against second preimages just by using grover's algorithim

True, but 80 bits are anything but trivial to brute-force using classical computers! I'm not that familiar with quantum complexity, but as I understand it, you'd still need 2^80 quantum operations to brute-force a 160 bit hash.
Mock Features for B2B SaaS
The less money that creators get from YouTube, the better. Content becomes a swamp when content gets monetized for the creator. The internet was so much better before everything was monetized. The platform should always be pocketing all the money.
Seems like ad revenue should go into a trust, if he is found innocent it gets paid to him, if guilty it goes to victim compensation or related charity.
If you append to a slice, you can't rely on the changes showing up in the original slice, nor on them not showing up.
Better study how much CO2 does a 'functional' LLM training cycle emits..
my thought reading this quote was: If you squint and turn it sideways, that's a solver function.

Sure enough, slightly higher in the article:
> “We use a circular reference in Excel to do linear regression.”
How does this compare with https://github.com/getumbrel/llama-gpt ?
does not work with a pen tablet
At least one could.
There's this really neat section of law known as administrative law. One of the tenants is that you are allowed to have pretty much any rule that you want to have but you have to apply it in a reasonably impartial and fair manner. This means, you can setup random rules that you enforce capriciously.
I suppose that this meta-flag won't work with musl libc.
> Thats kind of like saying dont use any software libraries because they all use the standard lib indirectly so you may as well just use that?

This is decent advice, IMO. The cost of dependency management is often vastly understated.
>The loop semantics do not have anything to do with arrays.

Loop in general or "for each" style loop, that's huge difference.

The 2nd one has a lot to do with collections.

>You can see that they are not crazy for picking the first implementation; it's less instructions and less code

Yes, it is not crazy when you're looking at it from the reverse engineering / implementation side

but if you start thinking about it from user's perspective then it is very bad behaviour

because they used "foreach" like loop which is a concept of walking thru every element of collection.
I'd rather we sorted out what 'the commons' means in an online context, but failing that? Yes. Because we're essentially privatizing all discourse and those companies can do pretty much whatever they want - as long as they don't piss off other companies too badly (eg, Twitter being demonetized because of Nazis).

We've lost the idea of broadcasting in the public interest decades ago, and there's no PBS for the internet (Just PBS on the Internet)
These Excel-based cases are related to the Microsoft Excel World Championship
[0]...!

I attended a recent streaming event of a Financial Modeling Battle i.e. Excel as esport! [1] It was fascinating to see - for its power users of Excel, for the competitive/esport aspect (people were cheering!), and for the domain specific questions (i.e. these did not feel like leetcode questions...)

[0] https://www.fmworldcup.com/

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7knfu4BJ_ug
1. It works just like bash if you want.

2. Scripts with #!/bin/bash or #!/bin/sh run as expected — even with bashisms.
The backslash is actually perfectly appropriate because they are doing more than interpolating strings (even though that's what `STR` is doing). They are also supposed to safely escape the contents of the values.
YouTube has been doing this for a while.

If you’re just starting out and don’t qualify to become a “partner”, you can’t monetize your videos until you reach X amount of subscribers and Y amount of watch hours.

This doesn’t mean your videos won’t have ads on them. They most assuredly will have ads on them.
It just means that YouTube doesn’t consider you good enough to share the revenue with you.

Load of BS of course.

Either content is good enough to place ads on, revenue of which is shared, or your content isn’t good enough to place ads on.
Making profit over someone else’s content (however abhorrent the person might be) is just dirty imho.
A blog post where I catalog all Lean [proof assistant] books that exist in nature, share my opinion on them, and suggest learning paths for Lean novices.
The difference is the distribution of power. In your second scenario, where 99% of people don’t need to work, very little of that 99% will have any political power because of their ownership of the machines that run the economy.

To make the point clear, I don’t think it would be a very good day for the slaves if those in power found out all labor could be accomplished by machines at a tenth of the cost of the slaves’ room and board.
As far as I'm aware, Oracle JDK gets fixes that OpenJDK doesn't, and is under a commercial license that's not GPL (even if it's free-as-in-beer under certain circumstances)? Is that wrong?
Monetization is not a moral judgment of the content, it's a business judgment of what high-paying advertisers are willing to be associated with. There are plenty of criteria for monetization that don't have anything to do with the moral value of the content.
the best outcome is always for a child to be with both biological parents. any other constellation may still provide a wonderful environment, but it always implies the absence of at least one biological parent, and this will affect the child.
If you google any sentence you will get some results, that doesn't mean something is to be said for the stated position.
"I choked on my latte. "Come again?""

That sentence is a rather decent: double entendre.
There are a handful of states now where the custody guidelines are 50/50, but most states don't have this yet. And you are right that there are more divorces these days with uncontested equal custody. So the situation is better than it was 30-40 years ago, where fathers typically got every other weekend, but it's still very biased. There are literally hundreds of groups devoted to helping fathers gain equal custody. "Men's rights" is virtually synonymous with winning custody battles.

Yes, 50% communal property is the default position. It is frequently modified to account for things like lower income (or the greater expense of having the children more). There's a reason why the story of the wife keeping the house and the man moving into a crummy apartment are practically cliche at this point.

> And it still doesn’t explain how women are incentivized to divorce, given that despite some of the things above, women still fare worse in divorce than men do.

Women file 70% of divorces. For college-educated women, it's nearly 90%. There's clearly an incentive for women. Men typically earn more income than women. Men have larger savings and retirement accounts. Men are more likely to have pensions. Men are more likely to own businesses and other assets. Divorce gives women a claim to all these things, even into the future, in ways that they would never have had in marriage.

Alimony and child support are both incentives for women (who typically earn less income and are more likely to not work at all). Even in 50/50 custody, the higher earning parent will pay child support.

You are right that fathers may still have nominally more income even after you account for alimony and child support transfers. But that doesn't mean it's still not an incentive. From a woman's perspective, she's earning the exact same income that she would be earning anyway, plus alimony and child support. It's still an incentive for her even if the man is earning nominally more. Just because Elon Musk and Tiger Woods are still wealthy after divorce, and likely still wealthier than their former spouses, the women definitely benefitted from those divorces and the men didn't.