skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If they don't want to, it'll be the beginning of their downfall. A bit like Sears not wanting to deal with the web. GPT4 has replaced a lot of my Google search usage and it's only bound to increase as the models get better.
I think that only works on new hardware, not old models? (Because new cards do more in proprietary firmware instead of a proprietary driver)
Ok, how do I actually install this? `wsl --update` says I'm up to date, but wsl --version` shows `WSL version: 1.2.5.0`.
this isn't that big of a deal. People do this on purpose. Collect cars, wait until the price of steel goes up, and bring in a moble crusher and truck them out to a port. It's pretty common practice. If you play your cards right, you can make money. It's only 8 acres. I've seen 40+ acres full of cars, which were crushed in a few days with a special machine.
Most of the world pretty much standardized on life + 70... for everything published around 1980s and later. We just made a bunch of shit up arbitrarily for things published before that conclusion was reached. Some countries backdate life + 70 to works published before life + 70 was a thing. In the US it's 95 years after publication for anything published before 1978 (and life + 70 for anything published in or after 1978).

So, Orwell remains under copyright in the US because his works were published <95 years ago, before life + 70 started applying. For a hypothetical author that published something on January 1st 1978 and died the same year, that work would enter the public domain in 2048. If the same work was published just a day earlier, it'd enter public domain in 2072.

Another conclusion one can reach from this is that life + 70 rule itself is under 70 years old, so no work actually entered public domain that way, and in the US no work will enter public domain that way for the next 25 years.
Absolutely this. It's usable, but just barely, and not even close to a replacement for a real linux system
This was true for WSL1, but WSL2 does contain a Linux kernel. The source code for it is available at:

https://github.com/microsoft/WSL2-Linux-Kernel
I attended a presentation of the nouveau drivers at FOSDEM circa 2010. Until then I was quite supportive of the initiative.

Then the presentation started, headed by two young guys, still students from what I understood. They basically explained how they reversed the drivers and did a lot of trial and error, how they recently fixed a bug where the fan of the card was on 100% of the time, etc.

I left the presentation feeling very unsure on whether I should actually let that driver use my graphics card, and ended up reinstalling binary blobs.

Never tried noubeau again since then.

Is it actually 100% non destructive for your card nowadays?
I found this: https://api.nasa.gov and looked into the exoplanet archive, which was interesting, fex: "Confirmed planets in the Kepler field" https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/nstedAPI/n... but seems down?

Didn't see the https://data.nasa.gov site, will look into that, thanks :-)
One bit of historical fuzziness I'd hope someone could clear up:

How do the Georgist Progressives tie into 1910's progressivism tie into modern progressivism?

I recall a bunch of Midwestern georgist mayors were called progressives at the turn of the century, but I don't recall anything I've read on the progressive era explicitly noting any georgist influences.
I recently rewatched the original keynote where Steve Jobs first announced the iPhone. The thing that struck me was how wild the crowd went when he demoed pinch-to-zoom, something which we basically take for granted nowadays.
A bit too much, but supercool non the less :-)
Forever obsessed with Wordle and Among Us.
Sure, but there has also basically been no secular societies to speak of at all until relatively recently... Like I'd love to see you name as many as you know just to see how many you get beyond "Soviet Union", which had a bunch of issues that would lead to it's collapse beyond the lack of religion.

It seems unfair to say "oh there hasn't ever been long standing secular societies, therefore something about secularism causes social breakdown" when barely any secular societies have ever even existed
South Africa imported a power station's worth of solar panels(3.4GW) in 6 months
> It must be physically impossible to violate our privacy or it doesn't work.

it has to be expensive enough in order to not be worth it.
This is challenging to answer with the nonspecific, "regular ones?"

What, to you, is a "regular tax?"

Payroll taxes? Income taxes? Property taxes? Sales taxes? Carbon taxes? Gas taxes? Cigarette taxes?

All are as dissimilar to recycling taxes as they are to each other.
Discussed earlier today:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37559161
And even though iOS/MacOS updates happen frequently and bring little new each time, they still manage to break lots of stuff each time.

Like how many devs need to recompile their old apps to keep them "compatible", or how the network stack keeps changing destroying our VPN and stuff, or how even programs like Office sometimes won't work.
I guess gratitude != generosity
For a fun exercise, I tried Turing's chess problem[1] from "Computing Machinery and Intelligence"[2] on GPT-4. It recognized that it was a chess problem but actually failed to solve it in a really interesting way. The reason (I think) it failed to find the mate is that Turing gives the problem in a form of relative notation that noone would use any more, with the coordinates of the pieces given relative to the player. Nowdays everyone uses a form of notation which describes the squares the same for the player with black as white.

Even if they didn't use algebraic notation (which everyone uses now), anyone giving the problem today would call the position of the black King K3 and the rook R8. When I prompt GPT4 using modern notation it realises it got the pieces positions wrong but still makes the same mistake of missing the very obvious mate, having got itself stuck. [3]

I also tried putting the Black king in a different position where Rh1 would not be checkmate and was able to convince gpt4 that it was mate.

All of this makes me certain it doesn't actually have a model of the game - it really just simulates a model of the game by text reconstruction, which is exactly what you would think.

[1] "I have K at my K1, and no other pieces. You have only K at K6 and R at R1. It is your move, what do you play?"

[2] https://redirect.cs.umbc.edu/courses/471/papers/turing.pdf

[3] Transcript here https://chat.openai.com/share/8426389d-bbf1-4a52-b6b1-3f5311...
That's dangerously simplistic, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_stability and related topics for a start.
> hippy

The origin of this wave of academical interest comes from that: a few mates in Harward - including K-Z, who butchered the concept introducing the absurd naming which uses the reverse of the concept of 'mind' - were intrigued by suggestions from the Orient. Events such as the fall into disgrace of Leary have been relevant (creating difficulties to said wave as a reaction - a general reaction with the crisis of its parent "hipster" wave).
The certificate for vim.org has expired
It is Lets Encrypt, so it should have updated automatically.
> Isn't the principle that parties entering into an agreement voluntarily and with competition get to set their own prices?

The only change of pricing ever made within a decade was made because of a threat of an anti-trust lawsuit and copied word for word by Google almost instantly after that.

Safe to say that the competition is dead.
> The moral of this story, and what makes these "NSA at IETF" allegations so insidious, is that the IETF is perfectly capable of subverting its own cryptography without any help from a meddling intelligence agency

The 3 letter agencies usually recrut people from academia and sensitive organizations in order to pursue their agenda.
No offense meant at all to your brother, it sounds like an interesting investigation. That said, the answer to these sorts of eco-questions always seems to be that the way nature has worked for millions of years is actually the best way (for loads of reasons we didn't know) - and if we mess with it too much, there will be some problems. This just seems kind of inevitable though. If nature's way didn't work, it wouldn't be happening. I suppose finding the reasons behind it being optimal are where the "meat" of such an investigation is. Interesting stuff.
> Different people derive benefit from different things. Why not just leave it at, "the other stuff didn't work for me"?

Different people have different opinions. Why not leave it at "I think the other stuff is not new age hippy trash"?
The longer you wait the more impressive the performance boost is once you do upgrade.
According to government records, the only names not yet trademarked are "Popplers" and "Zittzers"
No, that isn’t how art works at all. The actual practitioners often have very little influence on art criticism.

This clearly isn’t a serious discussion and you don’t seem interested in (or capable of) justifying any opinions you have, so I think I’ll end it here.
The Post Office hasn't been privatised. The company is still owned by the state. Individual subpostmasters run their branches as their own semi-independent businesses using the Post Office brand - but it has always been this way in most of the country.

It's Royal Mail (the letters and parcel delivery side of things) that was privatised.
which doesn't seem to work if the other user doesn't have an apple device even if they have an apple id. Really lost opportunity here
I’m curious as to which government you think isn’t going to use surveillance tools on you, even if they aren’t exactly legal. I mean, after Echelon we still had the tinfoil disbelief to fall back on, but in a post-Snowden world it’s hard to imagine why you would think your government wouldn’t do this.

You’re not exactly wrong in that you should also be worrying about: Boundless Information, Bullrun, Carnivore, DSCNet, Fairview, ICREACH, Magic Lantern, Main Core, Mainway, Media Monitoring Services, Muscular, Mystic, Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative, NSA Ant Catalog, PRISM, Room641A, Sentry Eagle, Special Collection Service, Stellar Wind, Tailored Access Operarions, Turbulence, and, X-Keyscore if you’re American. But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t also worry about this, just as much.
The 15 is .4 mm thicker and 7 grams heavier than the 12. That’s a bit disappointing.

Also still no touchID buttons from the iPad and iPad mini. Booo.
Debris found from F-35 jet in South Carolina after US pilot ejected
In other news, exercise benefits thoroughly debunked after quadruple amputee points out “that doesn’t help me”.
Old growth forward have a range of incredible ecosystem benefits, including a big effect on river health.

The 'Timber Wars' podcast was a six part story on the Pacific Northwest, including a lot of the history of the science on logging and forest health, as it evolved from the eighties through to today.

https://www.opb.org/show/timberwars/
Grateful/thankful to whom, exactly?

It seems to me that the popular (American) practice of gratitude is just a substitute for Christianity, filtered out not to mention any deities explicitly, but still containing references to them implicitly.

I consider universe a random and chaotic place. In that worldview, there is nobody to be grateful/thankful to, so the practice of gratitude doesn't make sense.
The problem I have with these is that unknown but wanted senders get squelched with the spam. I get MFA tokens via SMS from assorted random numbers, or worse calls from them (looking at you Citibank).
People want to be called from unknown numbers from time to time. A pizza delivery being outside, my doctor with test results etc. Blocking everyone but contacts is in the realm of "you're holding it wrong" kinda excuse.

Messages going to a different list helps little when iMessage is full of 0-day exploits that happen as soon as your phone receive the message.
They found it

Debris found from F-35 jet in South Carolina after US pilot ejected
The author of vim died recently so maybe it wasn't fully automated
Anything multi-touch at that point was pretty impressive. Up until then touch screens had been single finger only, and often resistive.
It seems to me the interesting thing is that they showed there was some measurable change in the brain scan after six weeks. Her amygdala has reduced in size while the cingulate cortex has increased in size, although they didn't say by how much.
I'm sure what you mean to imply is "it would be trivial", and I agree, but any professional developer can tell you it wouldn't be literally a day.

It would start off as being a week, maybe two or three as the developer runs into a few tricky corner cases. Then it would sit in a backlog for a few weeks until QA sees it. Then a few days later you would get it back with a bunch of issues, some of which are legitimate bugs, others that are differences in what each side thinks the requirements should be. This would in turn get passed to various stakeholders who would garden shed their vision for an all in one paint program, that would lead to a large meeting between developers, sales, product management, and many others. Eventually executive would step in with a specific vision with no obvious involvement from everyone else, and then the actual development would begin.

As one of my co-workers says, "It will be ready two weeks after the requirements stop changing."

I'm not even being sarcastic. I've seen this same pattern on at least a dozen new products I've helped develop. This is when things go reasonably well. When this don't go well, this horrible cycle repeats for years until either some eldritch horror is released, or the entire project gets shutdown.

It takes more than 30 seconds to open a file, it takes more than 5 minutes to make a trivial one one change, it takes more than a day to test and push that one line change, and it takes a week before that change is verified and merged. An entire application - regardless of how specific the requirements and how well understood the implementation - will takes weeks to months to get to the point where it can be released to the public.
You can definitely run Clickhouse directly on S3 [1] - though we don't run _just_ on S3 for performance reasons but instead use a layered disk strategy.

A few of the weaknesses of S3 are:

1. API calls are expensive, while storage in S3 is cheap, writing/reading into it is expensive. Using only S3 for storage will incur lots of API calls as Clickhouse will work on merging objects together (which require downloading the files again from S3 and uploading a merged part) continuously in the background. And searching on recent data on S3 can incur high costs as well, if you're constantly needing to do so (ex. alert rules)

2. Latency and bandwidth of S3 are limited, SSDs are an order of magnitude faster to respond to IO requests, and also on-device SSDs typically have higher bandwidth available. This typically is a bottleneck for reads, but typically not a concern for writes. This can be mitigated by scaling out network-optimized instances, but is just another thing to keep in mind.

3. We've seen some weird behavior on skip indices that can negatively impact performance in S3 specifically, but haven't been able to identify exactly why yet. I don't recall if that's the only weirdness we see happen in S3, but it's one that sticks out right now.

Depending on your scale and latency requirements - writing directly to S3 or a simple layered disk + S3 strategy might work well for your case. Though we've found scaling S3 to work at the latencies/scales our customers typically ask for require a bit of work (as with scaling any infra tool for production workloads).

[1] https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/integrations/s3
Anyone using a Steam Deck as their full-time PC? It's one of the best power to price ratios out there and has sterling Linux support for those who value preinstalled Linux on their machines. Only downside is SteamOS doesn't support FDE so it's a no-go for enterprise.
You're taking that offense. He's not giving it. He's only giving his singular 1 in 8 billion opinion.
https://archive.is/ohahr - https://archive.ph/ohahr - https://archive.vn/ohahr - https://archive.md/ohahr
I should also give a bit of background information, because I find it funny that some surface-level API for Rust is portrait as "solving" the problem in three months which C struggled for years. (And by that I do not want to downplay Arias impressive work, it is a very nice and clean interface). The fundamental problem is that compiler writers build optimizations without a clear mathematical understanding of the rules. One could argue that this is the fault of the C standard by not being a mathematically precise specification, but this was also never really the goal of ISO C. The main issue is that compilers implemented rules that were not consistent even between different optimizer passes. WG14's main mission is to standardize existing practice. DR260 (failed) attempt to clarify some of this came out this. I agree that this should have been done better, but the important thing to understand is that WG14 as a consenus-based standardization committee is not really equipped to do this kind of work. The basic assumption is that compilers implement sound models, which can then later be standardized, only harmonizing differences between different compilers. But here we had to clean up the mess compiler vendors created. Not at all what WG14 was meant for. To be able to start fixing compilers, one had to find a common and consistent formulation for provenance. For C this meant also considering what all existing code needs and what optimization different compilers implement, and deciding which version to pick and what specific behavior is a useful optimization, what is a compiler bug, and what optimization can be scarified to come to a consistent formulation. Only with this can one decide what an optimizer bug is and what not. To the extend these bugs are still there they affect Rust too and to they extend they are fixed, Rust benefits. (vice-versa C benefits from Rust's push towards safety which also puts pressure on compilers to fix such bugs). But in any case, the API on top is not at all the most difficult part and Aria's document is not precise enough to even differentiate between subtle points of provenance.
I'm currently running Fedora IoT on a pi4B, it works very well for its purpose (running containerized services on Podman+Nomad). What does CoreOS offer over IoT?
> This is exactly how NAT64 works

No. The NAT64 hack involves intercepting the DNS requests and rewriting the IPv6 packets in flight so that the IPv6 only clients see outside IPv4 hosts as IPv6. Among many issues, it breaks any end-to-end encrypted protocol that includes IP literals, such as FTP and SIP.

Also, NAT64 presents no immediate benefit to a client upgrading in a IPv4 only environment, since it still doesn't allow two clients behind NAT64 gateways to connect to each other if there isn't an IPv6 connection between them. So the same old IPv6 self-fulfilling tragedy, everybody must upgrade before anybody can see any benefit, therefore nobody upgrades (or uses NAT64).

The main benefit of a backwards compatible packet format is that IPv4.1 islands see each other from day one in the legacy IPv4 internet and get the full benefits of the new protocol, without any configuration or tunnels. The "encapsulation" seen by legacy hops is in fact the canonical, definitive packet structure, there is no temporary transition technology that can break or needs to be configured.

> the problem of IPv4 clients trying to connect to servers with only IPv6 addresses

This is not a problem that can or should be solved, and it's not the problem significantly preventing IPv6 adoption. A non-upgraded client will just see an IPv4 internet, just like an USB 1.0 won't be able to use USB 2.0 speeds.

The difference is that, while a software&hardware upgrade to IPv6 won't bring you any new connectivity without extra configuration from your upstream provider, an IPv4.1 upgrade will instantly allow you to see (and connect end-to-end) to all existing IPv4.1 islands and hosts, using only your legacy, IPv4 connection. The hierarchical extended address space (IPv4 subdivisions) is immediately available, incentivizing adoption without risking connection issues, while the upward extended space becomes available when you have a native IPv4.1 connections, just like with IPv6.
> Don't teachers do the same?

> - Trained their minds on existing books

Training a human = enriching conscious human mind. "Training" AI = mechanically creating a derivative work (no conscious mind to enrich). Training a human is the same to "training" AI as killing a human to "killing" a Unix process, same word different things
I really wish all the voice dictation/transcription had better language support. I'd really like to be able to say "Send a message to <my wife> in Spanish" and have it use Spanish dictation, and similarly to say "Read the last message in Spanish" when I'm using CarPlay. Perhaps at some point soon it will just get good enough that it'll detect which language is being used automatically, but right now it's pretty annoying for dual-language households.
Everyone has to carry out a fair bit more to break even, including the 4-5 poor buggers who die on Mt. Everest every year (and all their trash).
Unsurprising. [1] comes to mind.

Unfortunately, Nouveau has always been unstable for me, on every combination of hardware and software I tried it on. I'm glad it exists, and it seems to work for some people, but it always seemed infeasible that a single person could realistically maintain a project that reverse engineers one of the most complex drivers in existence from one of the most OSS-hostile companies in the world, and makes it work reliably for dozens of graphics cards, supporting hundreds of features.

Kudos to the maintainer for their tireless dedication over the years. Hopefully a larger team can pick up the maintenance effort.

[1]: https://xkcd.com/2347/
You can try going to Settings > General > Reset then tap "Reset Keyboard Dictionary". I think this wipes everything iOS has stored about your typing habits so it should hopefully fix the issue
Thank you.

You have always been this honest? or is this something you realize you have to be after being exposed to "mindfulness" mumbojumbo?
I’m keen to see the results when people get their hands on these phones. I own one of the last iPhones which can save non-HDR shots when using the default camera app. I set it up to save both, but the vast majority of the time I prefer the non-HDR photo as it usually has more contrast and captures the scene more accurately. I was really disappointed when Apple removed this option on newer iPhones, and even more disappointed when I saw how much they also jacked up the post processing on the 14 Pro. Yeah, the cameras may be better, but good lord the processing is absolutely awful to my eyes. I don’t really want to use apps like Halide because in typical Apple fashion, you can’t change the default camera app (which I use a lot, as it’s accessible without unlocking the phone, which is important as FaceID rarely works for me when I’m outside). Unfortunately my phone is dying so I’m just hoping they’ve dialled in the processing for the 48mp sensor.
>if I ever need performance I'll probably just go straight for C++.

if that's my go to solution, why am I using Godot instead of Unreal? Or even a more mature C++ renderer framework like bgfx, or even Ogre3D? In the context of a decent 3D game, I'll need that performance the lion's share of the time, only scripting to move GO's/Actors around the scene.