skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Even legal immigrant farm labor can be paid under minimum wage.

Child labor laws are also fudged a bit for that specific category. Like, by law, they are, not just by convention.
>if I hadn’t seen repeated direct evidence that even most technical users will blithely click through HTTPS errors’ “accept the risk” bypass

As far as I recall this is not possible on Chrome if you are MITM'd. If the cert presented doesn't match the cert in the HSTS cache, there is no option to bypass. If the server's cert is expired, then you do indeed see the option, but an expired certificate doesn't necessarily mean danger.
You can use dns over https over tor(dohot)[1]. Safer than a vpn if you dont mind your isp knowing you go to tor.
1.https://github.com/alecmuffett/dohot
Didn’t see a video! OK I am pretty excited now.

So long as it actually can create an image virtually the same but changed only how I want it. That would just blow everything else away.

I mean I guess it’s. Or that ridiculous. Generative fill in photoshop is kind of this, but the ability to understand from a text prompt what I want to ‘mask’ - if that’s even how it would work - would be very clever
Based on what, the private sector's long history of operating on a minimal cost/profit basis when bidding for government contracts?
“You won’t have to financially support the project in order to benefit from it” is the usual selling point. Corporations will overlook a cute name if it’s free, relative to another product.

If your corporation(s) don’t resell service deriving from Terraform, then there’s no financial reason to switch, since they’re not subject to the licensing risk — at which point it doesn’t matter what the name of the project is, either.

It’s still possible to make an argument to switch based on “community exodus from the commercially-supported variant”, which is at least more likely to be of interest to a classical C-corp than “ethical duty to open source”, but if opentofu contributions can be mixed into existing terraform, then that might not stand up well either.

If the corporation makes a decision solely based on (for example) hostility to vegetarians, then the name will be relevant — but that’s an outcome that is too irrational to account for.
The ads covering the whole background of some websites websites are the most outrageous thing I had the pleasure to discover recently after so much time of ad blocking. They are absolutely aggressive to your very soul.
There are two different questions:

- will be more artwork be bought (probably)

- will the increase in the quantity of artwork being bought (assuming there is one) compensate the decrease in price for each piece of art?

Clearly for software, _so far_, the increase in productivity / decrease in price has led to such a big increase in demand for software that some programmers are better off - I say _some_ because many jobs within the software industry stopped existing.

Yet if we look at something like agriculture, there has been some increase in demand in food products(e.g. much more meat is being sold), but one can only eat so much - so most of the increase in productivity has led to way fewer people working as farmers, and not much increase in farmers income.

No "these are tools to replace farmers - these are tools farmers can use to do more and better work".

Basically people are making statements about the elasticity of demand with respect to prices for prices & quantities no one has ever observed. If making a piece of art is now 1/2 (random number) the cost thanks to AI, will people buy 50% more? 100% more? 1000% more? I have no idea and I am not sure why people think they do.
> killing someone for not providing it

They wouldn’t live to tell the tale
your certainty is not based on reality.. "pet rocks" sold millions; BetaMax failed; great movies went unwatched, where stupid schlock got paid. Markets are not predictable entirely at all.
Another elitist article telling us we are happy with lower standards of living
How big are the programs, how often do your requirements change, and how many years or decades do you develop and support them?

Because tiny one time programs are indeed fun for a while until they “grow up”. :)
The game being an FPS was an afterthought, too. Originally, they were working on an RTS.
reminds me kitsch
I needed reminding too.

"In a "switched" network, when Device A wants to send data to Device B, the switch directly connects these two devices so they can chat. Think of it like a train switcher that directly links Track A to Track B for a specific train, instead of sending it through a maze of tracks where other trains are moving.

In contrast, a "hub-based" network is like a party line in old telephone systems. When Device A talks, EVERY device hears it, but only Device B cares and listens. This is less efficient and can be slower because all devices get the data, which clogs up the network.

Another option is a "routed" network, where a router decides the best path for the data. This is like GPS choosing the best route based on current traffic conditions. It's more flexible but can introduce more delays because the data might go through multiple steps to reach its destination.

It's called "switched" because the switch acts like a railroad switch operator, making a direct track connection from one device to another for each piece of data. It "switches" the pathway specifically for that data to make the communication as direct as possible."
Meanwhile, competitors are choking in papers, but fail to release anything I can get my hands on (that’s worth a damn).

I can actually appreciate “open” as “open to access” or “open to actually having a product iso posturing about being so far ahead but never releasing anything worthwhile” (looking at Google).
Very-low-protein diets lead to reduced food intake and weight loss
Very anecdotal (just the experience of me and my friends, who have a total of 5 new sterns between us), but I think there's not much maintenance. These things are made for commercial settings so they're pretty durable. One of mine had a bolt fall out of the auto plunger, which I screwed back in. When it fell out again I added some loc-tite and it has stayed in since. No other issues. If you're into DIY at all, they are VERY easy to access for repair. The playfields flip up, they come with technical manuals, many parts are generic, and all parts are pretty easy to find.
That is not how image-to-image approaches work.

ControlNet is a obvious counterexample. If you think "diffusion is just collaging", upload a control image using this space that cannot exist in the source dataset (e.g. a personal sketch) and generate your own image: https://huggingface.co/spaces/AP123/IllusionDiffusion
Never understood how blocking adult content generation is considered safety.
An interesting, critical review of Richard Reeves' book by Aaron Renn: https://ifstudies.org/blog/right-diagnosis-wrong-prescriptio...

A couple of excerpts that summarize Renn's viewpoint:

>> The directional similarity of Reeves’ recommendations to the MRA agenda shows why it won’t get much traction. The MRA vision never inspired a material number of men, and neither will Reeves. In part, this is because he wants men to become more like women, a project that will never appeal to ordinary guys. He cites David Gilmore’s very interesting book Manhood in the Making, which is an anthropological survey of how a diverse set of cultures around the world have defined manhood as a distinctive identity that builds on men’s strengths rather than seeks to minimize them. But Reeves rejects Gilmore’s insights. His agenda would be more compelling to ordinary men if he had worked with the grain of Gilmore’s findings on the common themes of manhood rather than against them.

>> The second half of his book, then, exemplifies a major problem in American public life—one where ideology prevents us from honestly addressing our biggest social issues—that is not specific to Reeves’ book. The same ideological straightjacket affects pretty much every other area of society as well, from opioids to homelessness. Which is why we have not been able to successfully address any of them. As a society, we must find a way to create the space in which the real sources of and potential solutions to serious social issues can be publicly discussed and ultimately confronted if we actually want to make progress in fixing any of them.
> Even legal immigrant farm labor can be paid under minimum wage.

Certain farm laborers have a lower minimum wage, and all farm laborers are federally exempt from overtime pay.
AI safety is the dumbest idea in the world by people who think computers are magic, so confusing its meaning is great. The original AI safety people now think LLM training might accidentally produce an AI through "mesa-optimizers", which is more or less a theory that if you randomly generated enough numbers one of them will come alive and eat you.
> Why would the Google app have more spyware than the Translate app?

It's a different app on top of the first app? I don't understand the question.

> Regardless of what you think of Google, the reason a feature lives in one app and not another is not to increase spying...

That's why google has apps at all.... They're a spyware company. That—and depriving users of honest transactions—is much of their business model. Especially post transition to Alphabet.
Follow us on Instagram.
Our Western attitude towards freedom of opinion on display.
Most of the terminals that I've looked at have a `--class` flag (gnome-terminal, wezterm, alacritty, and kitty all have it).

https://github.com/fmoralesc/neovim-gnome-terminal-wrapper also exists if you want to go that route. I tried it for a little while and it worked pretty well, but it's not particularly easy to re-use for other applications.

The mac version is a bit of a pain to set up the first time, but it's pretty straightforward after that!
Eh, I don't think that's it. I think it's just good old misinformation caused by skillful marketing. People think organic is healthier or better for the environment, so they prefer it, even though it's actually neither[1]. But it's real tough to get past the huge marketing push conveying that message for the past couple decades.

[1] https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/more-evidence-...
Framework – We are not sustainable
Correct, but there are clear rules to how humans can copy things. Also humans don't usually need to ingest and store billions of parameters about anything to learn about it nor could they. If they could they'd be software.
The word "just" is doing some heavy lifting here... To "just" do this, the agent would need to more or less completely take over the building infrastructure before Mullvad could react which is a lot easier said than done. Even if it were trivial it's still quite a few cuts above any competing VPN service.
I like a log to read like a book if it’s the result of a task taking a finite time, such as for example an installation, a compilation, a loading of a browser page or similar. Users are going to look into it for clues about what happened and they a) aren’t always related to those who wrote the tools b) don’t have access to the source code or any special log analytics/querying tools.

That’s when you want a log and that’s what the big traditional log frameworks were designed to handle.

A web backend/service is basically the opposite. End users don’t have access to the log, those who analyze it can cross reference with system internals like source code or db state and the log is basically infinite. In that situation a structured log and querying obviously wins.

It’s honestly not even clear that these systems are that closely related.
There is LLM-powered software and then there is software developed with the help of LLMs.

These paths are not mutually exclusive, but I’m personally more excited about the latter.
One problem that doesn't, in my opinion, get enough attention is that a model trained using unlicensed copyrighted work also stores some amount of the copyrighted material and uses that to create answers. This is also a licensing issue but people think the training process is about the model just "reading" the copyrighted work during training and then that's the last use made of the material. Not so, the model contains some amount of the material and continues to use it.

From the complaint linked from the article on The Verge:

88. Until very recently, ChatGPT could be prompted to return quotations of text from
copyrighted books with a good degree of accuracy, suggesting that the underlying LLM must
have ingested these books in their entireties during its “training.”
89. Now, however, ChatGPT generally responds to such prompts with the statement,
“I can’t provide verbatim excerpts from copyrighted texts.” Thus, while ChatGPT previously
provided such excerpts and in principle retains the capacity to do so, it has been restrained from
doing so, if only temporarily, by its programmers.
90. In light of its timing, this apparent revision of ChatGPT’s output rules is likely a
response to the type of activism on behalf of authors exemplified by the Open Letter addressed to
OpenAI and other companies by Plaintiff The Authors Guild, which is discussed further below.
I ran into a similar issue, except internet and phone would get really bad on a cold morning.

Tech showed up around noon, saw I was indeed having a bad connection, went and checked the signal at the junction box for the street (can't remember what you call these) and everything was normal there, so he closed it back up again and double checks the signal at the house again, but it was fine. He walks the lines to double check but everything looked normal.

His best guess was that moisture was condensing ever so slightly inside the junction box that morning, and was let out as soon as he opened it at around noon, which fixed the problem.
I think language models will help us sift through the garbage. I have a hard time finding answers using Google (too much SEO garbage), but ChatGPT does a pretty good job of filtering the noise. It's not perfect, but it saves lots of time vs. Google.
In recent JVM those options are going away, time to update naughty dependencies.
With HTTPS, ISPs can see _where_ you are browsing, but not _what_ you are browsing. Of course them seeing the top level domain still violates certain aspects of privacy, personally I’d prefer ISPs couldn’t even see that. But it’s not like they are peering into the actual content of what you are browsing.
XML prolog is optional.

> they're not file formats

Brb, gonna delete all my files without file formats
I dunno, flippening seems as cromulent as most other neologisms.
Are you trying to start a conversation that will revolve looking up dictionary definitions?
For another take, here is what the right is saying. Worth a listen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x17ip3ZwG0Q
Hence microservices.
What does the local client side look like? Could it be wrapped in a node daemon to sync to a local SQLite file?
> In part, this is because he wants men to become more like women, a project that will never appeal to ordinary guys.

Is it just me or does this reduce to the idea that ordinary men are stupid? Not on board with that at all.
People Who Run Public Companies Shouldn’t Live in Glass Houses
got a link to the whitepaper? or name?
> but I find the generative art bits really frustrating, and typing in long prompts to be also kind of not worth the effort

I think this might just be inherent in the domain - the state space for images is so much larger than it is for text, so there's just a lot more ways to interpret a text prompt. Sane "defaults" help, but it might just be inherently true that it takes a longer prompt to get close to what you're seeing in your head.
The fundamental differences in scale between manual recreation by a human and automated replication by a machine are what led to the creation of copyright law in the first place.
It’s not that I think it’s purely collage, but that inputting a high-quality image doesn’t somehow lead to generating better quality output by default. The various silly images created by using keywords like “Greek sculpture” or “Mona Lisa” are an example.
Open in this context means open for business.
Reinvent SmartTVs LG's WebOS Hackathon (Apply by 9/24)
Humans are nothing like a machine. Machines can be taken apart piece by piece and put back together again.
Haven't you always wanted to reinvent TV? LG is seeking developers and big thinkers to push smart TV innovation further through a webOS hackathon. Collaborate with their engineers to build groundbreaking apps and experiences.

The top teams will present concepts at LG's renowned Innovation Festival in SF (10/25) and compete for rewards and pitch directly to LG's CEO.

Spots are limited - apply by 9/24.
ChatGPT disagrees:

ChatGPT can be used in arguments and debates as a tool to provide information, generate ideas, and assist in the exchange of opinions. However, it's important to remember that ChatGPT is a machine learning model and not a human. It lacks personal beliefs, emotions, and the ability to engage in moral or ethical reasoning.

Here are some considerations when using ChatGPT in arguments:

Fact-checking: ChatGPT can be used to verify facts and provide accurate information. It can be a valuable resource for finding data and statistics to support your argument.

Idea generation: ChatGPT can help you brainstorm ideas and arguments, providing different perspectives and viewpoints that you might not have considered.

Counterarguments: You can use ChatGPT to explore counterarguments to your position. This can help you anticipate and address opposing viewpoints effectively.

Ethical considerations: Be cautious when discussing sensitive or controversial topics. ChatGPT's responses are based on the data it was trained on, which may reflect biases present in the training data. Be aware of potential biases in the information it provides.

Support, not replacement: While ChatGPT can be a useful tool, it should not replace critical thinking and informed analysis. It's essential to critically evaluate the information it provides and use it as a supplement to your own knowledge and judgment.

Respectful communication: Remember to engage in respectful and constructive discourse when using ChatGPT in arguments. Avoid using it to generate disrespectful or offensive content.

In summary, ChatGPT can be a valuable resource in arguments and discussions, but it should be used thoughtfully and responsibly, with an understanding of its limitations and potential biases. It should complement your own reasoning and research rather than serve as a substitute for them.
I’m not expert in Svelte or React and have been following your conversation. You stress the point that two-way data binding creates mess. I tend to agree since I did my share of desktop programming long time ago. However, I don’t see how React solves the problem fundamentally. When you combine React with Redux or hooks IMHO you get exactly the same thing. The big difference is syntax that makes it easier to reason how view would re-render in response to change. But in a large enough project I can see how this became less and less true as distant modification trigger cascades of model updates/reducers/hooks and result in an unexpected behavior.
I’ll be interested how they will implement the interactions framework with hands and eye gaze at that price point.
Meta’s hand / eye interaction stack is not great after several years.
Apple’s one looks ok, to be tested.
Better market it as a dumb screen and focus on visual clarity. A large 2D surface would go a long way in the market if done properly.
Wonder if the cost is prohibitive enough that casual users (like myself) would benefit from a ChatGPT Plus subscription style service.

I'd love to see some basic usage included in my GPT+ sub

edit: Welll... they say "Try ChatGPT (DALL·E 3 coming soon!)" ... if they are including some DALLE usage in GPT i'm going to resub instantly. So huge.
Eh, this year we had over 60 days of 100F+ weather, with temps not going below 85 at night for a considerable portion of that. Even if I grow them in the shade of the porch they won't get flowers for a month at a time.
When searching for OpenAI and Enterprise I only find ChatGPT Enterprise. Does that mean they have a separate API that is not in the regular OpenAI API?
I am one of the more powerful open source fanatics out there, and yet this constant refrain, over and over, lamenting that the name of the company is inaccurate, is very tiresome. I think we know here. This does not add anything to the discussion IMO. Observing that no weights, code, or paper were released are useful, but the line about “OpenAI is not really open” is IMO tired and unproductive. They aren’t going to change it. It’s just sour grapes at this point.
you can still hear cellphone and wifi noise in crappy amplifiers - i have two sets of active muff hearing protection - the ones with microphones on each earpiece, and if you get inbetween a beamforming WAP or near any wifi antenna, or near a cellphone, you get "brrz bz bz bz bzzzzzz tiktiktiktiktik".

But this is different than the old <2g/edge phones, which wouldn't interfere unless you were about to get a call - because the tower said "where's this phone?" and your phone would max out it's tx and say "here i am!" and that's what you heard. This is probably incorrect, but based on my observations this is what occurred.

Remember the doodads you could put on your startac style phones on the antenna bit, with LEDs in them - they'd light up when you were about to get a call, as well, by design!
Do you have some links to articles about this topic from the left? I typically hear this from the right and have yet to hear something from the left, and I'm curious about how it's framed and understood.
I recommend two videos by Lindybeige about tanks in that museum:

Top 5 tanks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSNNNMYmTKQ

Bottom 5 tanks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33m_6aTru4g
I'm just being realistic here. Two decades of flip-flopping party power, and has the climate gotten any better?

Every single election cycle we have this discussion. "Well, at least the Dems are better than the Republicans. They're the best we can get." It's not enough. Hasn't been enough for a long time.
The left talks about this all of the time, as do the middle and right. Pretending otherwise makes me question whether the author is actually trying to help or simply sell his book.
Archaeologists discover oldest wooden structure
I asked DALL-E 2 for several pictures of "DO NOT ENTER" signs and a few of them had signs that said "DO ENTER".
Mike Rowe is a blatant shill for anti-labor practices and it's clear even in this clip.
Agreed, but there's room in the middle. Meta releases Llama papers and weights. And the community is all the better for it.
I mean, his point is that the Left doesn't actually drive home all the things they do that benefit men.

> You have an infrastructure bill that will create jobs largely for men. Two-thirds of the jobs in the infrastructure bill will go to men: black men as much as white men, and Hispanic men a little bit more, because they’re so represented in the construction industry. Don’t hide from that fact, as the administration does when they’re challenged on it.

And then also things that are cut and dry worse for men (i.e. suicide rate) you don't see a gender breakdown showing that [1]. And even when the press material has a gender breakdown its part of the "Age" section even though being male is a 3x affect while the age is ~0.25x [2].

Jacobin's point is about messaging and not that "The Left" doesn't do anything.

[1]: https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/index.html

[2]: https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/disparities-in-suicide.htm...
That's an odd reaction to Reeves who specifically criticizes the MRA types.
Open you wallet ;-)
For all the press releases the images displayed are always very impressive, however whenever I try a similar (at least from my point of view) prompt I get undefined blobs full of mistakes. Is my prompt-fu that low or is that a more widespread issue?