skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The Cyber Privateer Code
Being reasonably conserved has minimal predictive power. Yes, knocking it or a closely related gene out out harms eye formation in a wide range of species but it says little about what specific structure ends up being formed.
Some of the recommendations in the list date back to .NET Framework.

Most of the time, it is not something one needs to worry about because actually problematic cases are highlighted by default Roslyn analyzers and will give you a warning on build as well.

Async/await is a superior model that is more flexible and solves more tasks (heh) at hand than green threads which have more limited scope of application, higher base overhead and cannot reach parity at efficiency due to stack state having to be always preserved.
So if I run a social media site, I would be required by law to carry hate speech, incitement to overthrow the government, rape threats, heretical religious statements, fascist propaganda, and covid conspiracy videos? That's gonna be a no from me. Freedom of speech does not imply a mandate for others to broadcast your speech.
78% by number not by amount (mass).

The tire particles are incredibly small, so there are lots of them.
You'd be surprised how much of a transaction goes into fraud protection. But CC companies make more money from interest/late payments than they do transaction fees. They _used_ to make money primarily on transactions, but that has changed since in the 2000s a couple of mathematicians proved they can make way more by being predatory.
Indeed. The entire applovin.com domain is blocked by the "AdGuard - Mobile Ads" filter that I have enabled in uBO.
I am also very much a free speech absolutist. But demonetization is different. Anyone who wants to see the video still can, so Russel Brand has not had his freedom of speech restricted in any way.

This is not a policy of guilty until proven innocent. It's a policy of "advertisers don't want to be associated with rapists." And while there is a good argument for allowing access to YouTube as a public square, there is no such argument for allowing access to YouTube as an advertising platform.
I wrote my own little thing that just counts page hits/referrers, but only keeps aggregates for older data (e.g. the hourly data is kept for a week, daily data for a year, weekly data for 10 years, and only yearly data kept forever). It also keeps track of how long the page took to load, and how long it took to generate on the server if the page provides it, and that's it. I can make a new project/page and get a tracking snippet for it in one second, and then I barely ever even look at the stats, which saves even more time. But should something crazy happen, I would like to be able to, and that's all I need really.
GPL is what allowed Monty to fork after selling the MySQL trademark and copyright to Oracle. So Monty lost the ability to dual license, yet gained much money. Arguably with GPL2 he could even fork with proprietary plugins created later. Or he may have negotiated a backroom deal with Oracle to keep some relicensing rights.
Good effort, LLM's can truly save the grunt work here.
> We learn, the value of an expression in a comparison is not the same as its result (probably due result cleanup, especially, when the exponent happens to be zero.)

That happens all the time on traditional x86 - (non-SSE) floating point registers are 80 bits and then (usually) get rounded to 64 bits when you store them in memory, so you will very often have an expression that's nonzero if you use it immediately, but zero if you put it in a variable and use it later.
It's not like he's poor or anything.
good to know, and it makes sense!

ty
I was generally frustrated with the parade of posts about how bad Godot is from former Unity devs. This happened to be the article that I commented on.
So I guess Youtube should instead by compelled to continue providing their monetization and hosting services to anyone who wants it until a court of law can prove they are guilty of an actual crime?

Who is going to compel Youtube to continue providing those services again?
Is it just me or does it seem like a lot of folks aren't very happy with the Next.js experience right now?

- Saw this thread the other day: https://www.reddit.com/r/nextjs/comments/16j14ba/this_is_the...

- Another thread mentioning being "disillusioned" and switching to .NET Core: https://www.reddit.com/r/dotnetcore/comments/16n0h5x/moving_...

- The e-commerce startup I was at was using Next.js 12 and decided to move to Astro.js instead after discovering Next.js was seemingly a no-fun zone.

- A few of the team members at the startup ended up starting subsequent projects on other tooling (Nuxt.js)

Wondering if this is a bit biased on my behalf or other teams are seeing the same.
> But the thing is, a majority of people on Earth are Youtube users, so what the heck does that even mean?

This is beside the point, but I want to bring it up because I think it's important to remember we live in a bubble.

A majority of people on earth are not Youtube users. Only ~60% of the world's population uses the internet[1], and of those, I'd assume a significant portion lack the bandwidth to stream video. Also, Youtube is blocked in China.

---

1: https://ourworldindata.org/internet
Google Cloud Datastore now supports multiple databases under one project ID
> Nobody has ever claimed that Huawei devices have backdoors.

Just a few comments up in this thread, someone claimed definitively that Huawei equipment has been proven to be compromised, meaning backdoored.

> They are compromised in terms of governance

We don't have any known examples of Huawei being forced by the Chinese government to compromise its equipment. This is still a wholly theoretical discussion. In contrast, we know that the US government has inserted backdoors into American (and not just American) equipment, and is able to secretly compel companies to comply with US spying.
I see they offer Kafka's exactly-once delivery: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/cloud-...
The catastrophe of tossing plastics into the ocean is arguably worse than the combined sinking of ships with cannons. But to call it violent because of the cumulative pain it indirectly causes is still a different, more abstract concept of pain than direct infliction. I’m not opposed to acknowledging either as pain, or to say that either is the worst, but they’re different.
That's because those regulations are written by people who despise regulations. They are meant to fail, so that eventually "the free market" (aka their rich friends) will get free reign, because "regulation clearly failed!".
> The international group of scientists that conducted the research, which draws from 2,000 studies

Seems like they based it off of enough studies.
Is there a way to declare any type uncopyable? This is something I always thought Ada got right.
Did I read this correctly? It sounds like YouTube will continue to host his content, but will now pocket the money they would have paid him.

That doesn't seem right to me. If they were to cease hosting his material, that would maych their corporate-speak blurb. This sounds to me like more money for YouTube.
How do you come to that conclusion?

The cleanliness of an office space is a gigantic force multiplier for productivity. I wouldn't be surprised if janitors had a bigger impact.
Ultra simple firewalls that expose your internal network architecture are less secure than NAT. You simply cannot information about your internal network without risk and there’s zero direct benefit for doing so.
They are forking from WASI Preview 1, but Bytecode Alliance is working on WASI Preview 2.
Money and greed are close to impossible to overcome.
Just in terms of viewership do you have a specific source for saying his audience is comparable?

I am having trouble finding something reasonable. e.g.

6.58M youtube subscribers
80 million television households as subscribers for CNN

Although these numbers are not really comparable

~700k daily watchers for CNN: https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/here-are-cable-news-ratings-...
800k video views for Russel: https://socialblade.com/youtube/user/russellbrand

Although of course video views != daily watchers (one person can watch multiple ones & that number can be juiced)
Records from a rape clinic one woman went to shortly afterwards, indirect witnesses (e.g., someone who heard one of the women screaming from outside Brand's home during the assault), and exchanges shortly after the fact alluding to the assault (including by Brand).

There are apparently many other allegations, but four have relevant supporting evidence.

Here's a summary: https://www.vox.com/culture/2023/9/18/23878706/russell-brand...
More generally: late stage capitalism.
Maybe a 100 devs Go is fine, but it gets to be a nightmare as you scale beyond that.

Language abstractions exist to prevent having developers build their own ad-hoc abstractions, and you find this time and time again in languages like Go. You can read the Kubernetes code and see what I mean, they go out of their way to work around some of the missing language features.
One Medical makes it easy to get tested for STDs; it's not a colonoscopy, which is a specialist procedure. Looking at my app, the next available appointment with my PCP is two days away, at which point she'll put in a lab order. I go down the hall, they draw blood, and I give them a urine sample, and a few days later I get a pdf of results in the app.

Not just for my own peace of mind, but potential partners have asked to see it in the past. Different cultures I guess. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That's true in a sense, but you've got to go way down. At a fine enough level --- say, at the level of atoms --- all material things are granular, and circular or spherical things are built stepwise from material building blocks, as though from pixels. Thus even very "smooth" things are rough and granular.

Further: There are no circular (2D) molecules; nature prefers hexagons and other polygons for that. Even the proton isn't perfectly spherical. Whether the electron and other subatomic particles are perfectly spherical cannot, as yet, be determined. (The electron seemingly has a diameter far below the Planck Length.)

There are no very large circles or spheres, either. All astronomical bodies are somewhat flattened.

So I dare say perfect circles and spheres do not really exist, save as idealized mathematical objects.
I'm quite sure the 99.9% from GPs comment refers to the whole population, not just the ruling class. The 0.1% alludes to today's ruling class.
That was 100% on purpose, they won't care and will force a backdoor anyway.
If a playground has toxic material, then the playground is doing it wrong, not the parent.

And yes, it's a full time job (at certain ages), and no it's hardly the primary responsibility, it's one of many.
Making Energy from Waves
This will result in more memory allocations but it's well worth it.
> I'm personally really excited about all of the recent tooling for postgres aggregates. Definitely a pain point for a lot of developers

Could you give a few examples of what you are speaking of?
Blocking the thread with unawaited task.Result is an explicit choice which will be flagged by a warning by an IDE and when building, that this may not be what you intended.
HN is a global forum, and most people probably don't know about UPI.

But this is amazing. Do you have a subscription service or do you charge a markup on forex deposits ?

Also how did you build a legal structure to allow this ?

Congrats on the launch. Wish you success :)
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/08/elon-musk...

>A senior Ukrainian official has accused Elon Musk of “committing evil” after a new biography revealed details about how the business magnate ordered his Starlink satellite communications network to be turned off near the Crimean coast last year to hobble a Ukrainian drone attack on Russian warships.
Java also had this problem with anonymous classes. The solution is usually to introduce a functor. Being pass-by-value, it captures the state of the variables at its call time, which helps remove some ambiguity in your code.

If you try to do something weird with variable capture, then any collections you accumulate data into (eg, for turning an array into a map), will behave differently than any declared variables.

Go is trying to thread the needle by only having loop counters work this way. But that still means that some variables act weird (it's just a variable that tends to act weird anyway). And I wonder what happens when you define multiple loop variables, which people often do when there will be custom scanning of the inputs.
You forked the WASI Preview 1 and are making your own standards from it, and instead of working with the Bytecode Alliance, you are forcing your own standards.
When you click on an item and move your cursor to the top or bottom of the visible bubble, the mouse instead selects the item next to it. I'd consider an item whose selection box is smaller than the visual outline to be a bug. It's also jarring to have items "running away" from the mouse cursor.
There's already layers upon layers of empty home taxes in BC and vacancy remains near 0%. There's really no remarkable amount of empty homes anywhere. Every time someone has tried to search for it they've came up with very little.

The simple dull reality is that there's a huge shortage of homes because homes were under built for decades and decades due to 1) exclusionary zoning and 2) governments stopping funding any and all below market housing in the 1990s.

The shortage of suitable homes of course hurts families very badly.

Many large homes suitable for families are occupied by retirees that don't want to move and don't have anywhere good to move (because again, we've built little). Zoning prohibits subdivision and redevelopment of the vast majority of the surface areas of cities so creating more housing is difficult.

Families need 1300sqft+. We badly need to rezone the entirety of our cities broadly to allow massive sfh lots to be redeveloped to create multiple 1300sqft+ spaces suitable for families. Rowhouses, Townhouses, and Apartments.
> A reporter telling lies would presumable be called into their managers office and told to shape up or be fired.

I can't help but read this and feel like you must not be familiar with the UK press, particularly the tabloids. The UK tabloids make shit up all the fucking time with next to zero consequences.

For a more US centric take you might want to read Ryan Holiday's book "Trust Me I'm Lying: Confessions Of A Media Manipulator". He goes into specific detail about his time when he was in charge of marketing for American Apparel and how he got US media outlets to write completely bullshit stories for him and others clients like Tucker Carlson to get publicity. There's hardly anyone doing proper fact checking at a lot of these publications anymore, especially on smaller stories, because their print revenues have collapsed since the internet and they're desperately trying to stay afloat.
on CME they're not decimal though, they're binary fractions

so floating point works fine as floating point is binary fractions
He could argue he was discriminated against because he's actually secretly a butterfly; both arguments would hold similar weight.
My understanding is that when a channel's content is not monetized, no ads are displayed. So no, YouTube is not pocketing the money they would have paid him.
If Google was compelled to keep arbitrary content monetized, the first thing they'd do is improve the tooling for advertisers to opt out of objectionable content in a more automated way.

You're just pushing the problem to a different level. It's easy to make a case that Google has to carry content, but forcing advertisers to spend money sponsoring it?
Yep. Floating point addition is not even associative, so they're not only not a field, but not a ring, not a group, nor even a monoid.
At this point matrix will have to move out from the UK, along with Element too.
It seems that Nushell is following the ZeroVer versioning scheme[0].

[0] https://0ver.org/
The loop semantics do not have anything to do with arrays. The point of confusion is whether a new slot for data is being created before each iteration, or whether the same slot is being used for each iteration. It turns out that the same slot is being used. The Go code itself is clear `for i := 0; i < 10; i++`. `i := 0` is where you declare i. Nothing else would imply that space is being allocated for each iteration; the first clause of the (;;) statement is only run before the loop. So you're using the same i for every iteration. This is surprising despite how explicit it is; programmers expect that a new slot is being allocated to store each value of i, so they take the address to it, and are surprised when it's at the same address every iteration. (Sugar like `for i, x := range xs` is even more confusing. The := strongly implies creating a new i and x, but it's not doing that!)

Basically, here are two pseudocode implementations. This is what currently happens:

i = malloc(sizeof(int))
*i = 0
loop:
<code>
*i = *i + 1
goto loop if *i < 10

This is what people expect:

secret = malloc(sizeof(int))
*secret = 0
loop:
i = malloc(sizeof(int))
*i = *secret
<code>
*secret = *secret + 1
goto loop if *secret < 10

You can see that they are not crazy for picking the first implementation; it's less instructions and less code, AND the for loop is pretty much exactly implementing what you're typing in. It's just so easy to forget what you're actually saying that most languages are choosing to do something like the second example (though no doubt, not allocating 8 bytes of memory for each iteration).

Remember, simple cases work:

for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
fmt.Println(i) // 0 1 2 3 4 ...
}

It's the tricky cases that are tricky:

var is []*int
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
is = append(is, &i)
}
for _, i := range is {
fmt.Println(*i) // 9 9 9 9 9 ...
}

If you really think about it, the second example is exactly what you're asking for. You declared i into existence once. Of course its address isn't going to change every iteration.
Absolutely!

I cannot imagine a CAD system that can't symbolically represent what is actually desired. The model and its spec should be one and the same.

Approximations also open the door to different precision versions. Not helpful when different parts from different sources need to be consistent.

Models that approximate/vary from the ideal spec, created intentionally to match manufacturing limitations, are ok.
Talking to them on the internet/real life over the past ten years
Prefixing doc comments with the ident name is a convention that isn't enforced in any way. You must have been using a 3rd party linter.
Obviously different perspectives in this thread.

Robert Griesemer, Rob Pike, and Ken Thompson are objectively smart men and pioneers and have learned from lots of mistakes both they and the industry made.

Go embodied a lot of those learnings out of the gate.

If the bar is to be perfect out of the gate that’s impossible and I can’t think of any language that could pretend to be so.

Go was very good out of the gate and has slowly but surely evolved to be great.
Within an order of magnitude would be 2M users. This is not within an order of magnitude.
Community is an abused term nowadays
Everyone else solved this problem by using list comprehensions instead. Rob has surely heard of those.
Some people celebrate that humans were able to “overcome nature” (modulo destroying it as a habitable place for ourselves), i.e. could live basically anywhere with the help of technology.[1] I think though that it might have been better for us (again, modulo The Earth) if we had become constrained by natural forces outside of ourselves (predators, other forces of nature) so that we couldn't do that. Because we are now—and have been for all the thousands of years of advanced human organization—the biggest threats to ourselves (wars, class society, subjugation). And although what we might call lower forms of life can be cruel—like a school(?) of orcas playing with their prey—nothing in nature can be as cruel to a human being with knowing intent as other human beings.

[1] And I reject those that claim that we “cheat” nature by using tools and technology (referring to e.g. people who claim that hunters “cheat” by using advanced weapons and tools); those things are a vital extension of us. Humans without technology would be like polar bears without ice sheets.
China’s critical infrastructure is too concentrated. The CCP won’t survive a bombing campaign since its legitimacy comes from economic development.
classic. I read this 20yrs ago.
Well yes, and. It's apples and oranges.

And FWIW, chemistry is only a little bit older than software. Like most other fields - there was a qualitative jump in the last ~100 years; arguably we didn't know shit about anything before the 20th century, before the theoretical and practical tools converged to allow some kind of formalized, precise knowledge and experimental work.
With any luck we'll go even further than that and confine him to a small metal box for a period of several years.
Ironically, this attitude is also why we have the climate change issue in the first place.

And why mitigation is hard to get anyone to actually move forwards on in meaningful amounts.
On the chart, really surprised the 'Ocean Acidification' isn't higher.

Thought one of the big impacts of atmospheric CO2 was the impact on acidification.

Guess we have some room to grow on that scale.
I'm tempted to try this, not because I want a locally running version of openAI, but just because the openAI website is so painful to use.

I'm currently on an intel mac mini with almost no memory, so I can't even download to test this (I have to close all other programs just so I can build an app in xcode).

I've got a razer blade as well, but obviously mac only doesn't help there.
It's doable, but the odds are stacked against you.

Most engineers have an "if you build it they will come" mentality. And it's important to know that nothing could be further from the truth. The make or break line will be sales. If you know nothing about sales and aren't passionate about learning and leaning into it hard, then you won't see a dime.

Partner with someone who is interested in making the cold calls and pounding the pavement to get your first few customers. Work together on a pitch deck, start sketching in a few things that you can demo, and work with them hard on getting those clients.
ATX Version 3.0 Multi Rail Desktop Platform Power Supply
Why the #-@-#&# do they allow blockchains??? I guess they probably figured out it's good for the bottom line and all, but it's pretty obnoxious to allow blockchains, which seems to have been the cause of the shortages, while banning everything else.
You are surely losing your mind then. Python3 isn't something esoteric.
It's possible to do that with ChatGPT 4, though it's not always consistent. You can even tell it to produce a compressed version of input text that it will understand and it usually works.
> The US and China are already sanctioning each other's tech.

It's not symmetrical. Since Trump, the US has been extraordinarily aggressive in its use of sanctions against Chinese companies, whereas China has been very reluctant to retaliate directly.

The US has sanctioned hundreds of Chinese tech companies. China has only recently begun to retaliate in kind, but has so far only sanctioned a few US companies (Micron is the only prominent example that comes to mind).
Derivatives are generally subject to some fairly large uncertainty in valuation, for example bid/offer spreads are usually many orders of magnitude larger than floating point error. When the derivative expires it does have some very fixed value but the investment bank will have made enough money off the trade to "generously" round up the float to the nearest cent.