skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I did not even imagine the possibility of shopping for ice cream, daily, at a convenient store due to the extra costs from convenient store pricing. But I guess it is in the realm of possibility.
Yeah, I know. The person in question is CTO of a well-funded Series B startup, and is highly technical. But he's very much a cowboy when it comes to coding practices etc. I think LLMs appeal to him because they hold out the promise of not having to deal with his own developers when he's trying to do something himself that he doesn't already know how to do.
> Automation increases demand

Yours is a different definition of demand than the economics definition, which is basically the amount customers will buy as a function of price. Higher demand means buyers will pay a higher price for the same art.

Automation increases supply, which increases the volume of art consumed, mainly because it is available at a lower price. That is shifting to a different point on the same demand curve, and doesn't mean that demand has increased.
https://www.ma.imperial.ac.uk/~buzzard/xena/natural_number_g... :

> In this game, you get own version of the natural numbers, called `mynat`, in an interactive theorem prover called Lean. Your version of the natural numbers satisfies something called the principle of mathematical induction, and a couple of other things too (Peano's axioms).

Such axioms are hard-coded in SymPy, SageMath, and Mathematica but not in Lean Mathlib (which is not optimized for performance)

If there are an infinite number of unitary transformations (as rotations on a Bloch sphere for example), I find it unlikely that we've yet discovered all of the requisite operators and axioms and coded them into any human CAS that exists in present day.
The main difference is that for JNI, you need a library that exports specifically Java-callable functions with signatures like

void Java_org_package_name_ClassName_method(JNIEnv *env, jobject _this, ...)

These are bound to `native` methods in classes when you load the library with `System.loadLibrary()`. Most often these libraries are thin wrappers that call into a C/C++/Rust library and convert data between Java and C representations (especially arrays and strings). It's tedious, it's annoying, and it's a platform-dependent artifact you need to ship with your app and build for all platforms on which your app runs.

FFM, on the other hand, is a proper foreign function interface. You don't need any wrappers with it, you'd just load your native library of interest directly and obtain method handles to call its C functions.
I would give my left arm to stop having to check work email for the five people who still use it.

Something in the middle sounds lovely.
I don't need to define it. It would be open to reasonable interpretation.

If an online platform creates an unclear or vague rule and use that rule to remove a user, then that user could pursue legal actions. If a court agrees that the rule (or rules) used to remove the user from the platform is unclear or too vague from the perspective of a reasonable person then the platform would need to pay out for their mistake.

Therefore it would be in their interest to ensure they have clear and explicit rules.

I don't think this is hard and we shouldn't pretend it is. It's just regulators in the West rather force Apple adopt USB-C and destroy E2E than than protect us from arbitrary corporate censorship.
Yeah, that's surely the case but I know better and don't comment on those.
This media bias chart[0] seems to put them squarely in the left.

Disclaimer, I'm not very familiar with either The Atlantic, nor who runs allsides.com and whatever biases they may have.

https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
Stacked against them more than girls? Explain please.
> but still plenty of folks want and will want them

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37383877

https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rates/

https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2014/02/World-population-...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37300184

> plus you cant erase biological needs of women that easily.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37325120 ("How South Korea’s birth rate dropped below Japan’s")

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34992144 ("Japan births fall to record low as population crisis deepens")
> Our research in robotics is aimed at amplifying people rather than replacing them

Noble, but the reality is that once the genie is out of the bottle it will be used by many MBAs to replace people.
Sorry, did you say something? I was meditating.
I cannot think of any use for this. It must have been a fair bit of effort to create too. What a strange idea.
That is certainly a.... take on Frontex job. But by that take, tze job of border police is to shoot at people. Well, at least in East Germany that was part of the job description, they aimed at people tryingbto leave so.

And invaders require an invasion. That means war, and then it woupd be the various NATO navies and airforces doing the shooting.

What Frontex does is just simply illegal and inhumane in some cases.
The two aren't mutually exclusive. It is a common monetization strategy for open source projects to offer a paid hosted option in addition to free self-hosting. For example, you can self-host Matrix (synapse, dendrite, and conduit) but you can also pay the creators of Matrix to host it for you[1].

[1] https://element.io/pricing
OpenAI releases third version of DALL-E – DALL-E 3
So continues the trend of bad takes.
Crafting descriptions of an artist and/or individual works may function as a reasonable replacement for specific names. That's what's happening behind the scenes anyway.

It's an interesting problem. Like, what's the point of conception for a work of art?
Nice, I wasn't aware of that. But it doesn't change the argument much: the XML document still only contains text data, and it's the schema validation phase that's responsible for converting the data into the correct format. Validating an XML document is an optional step, and I'm not aware of many tools that use XML as their config that perform full schema validation.

To add, the XML specification on decimal data types [0] explicitly says: Precision is not reflected in this value space; the number 2.0 is not distinct from the number 2.00 -- so a decimal data type in an XML document would have the exact same problem as the YAML example in TFA; the only difference is that with XML, the authors of the tool would have to actively shoot themselves in the foot by annotating that element as a decimal type rather than text.

[0] https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#decimal
No, they mean they think of the API as being used only by companies. Which is probably true, overall.
The left isn't working for them and you could say the same thing about the left.. unchecked it becomes China or USSR. Things will swing back and forth. Too many left policies created unhappiness.. too many right policies will create unhappiness in the future. Rinse and repeat.

The mass immigration policies of the left has created a burden on some (while creating a boom for others).
I don't think we do tolerate false negatives, for this class of thing, all the time.
That’s vague but it sounds like there may be differences in scope: if the problem you’re talking about is, for example, women not being hired at the same pay as equally-skilled men, that is a structural problem requiring systemic solutions. If on the other hand the problem is something like men not getting therapy because their peers will mock them (repeat for drinking too much, disrespecting women, etc.) there is some room for governmental action but a lot of it does have to be social change at a smaller scale. All the DARE posters in the world didn’t stop anyone from using drugs - but addressing economic and healthcare issues do, and that’s pretty frequently mentioned in conversations I’m part of.
That part says “mock quote”. From the start.
I think you're likely wildly over-estimating the number of times that last thought enters into people's minds (even if it's the case, I think it doesn't occur to most people).
categorically false.
I am very sure they weren't speaking literally...
Is AdGuard better than easylist?
While screens of earlier MacBooks could be turned off with a single magnet, my 2020 Intel MBP requires both the left and the right sensor (around the tab and the enter key) to trigger at the same time to consider it closed. It would be nearly impossible to trigger that accidentally. For starters, you'd need to wear two watches..
That feature wasn't big to my browsing style, Arc's way of nesting browser views suits me more, but Orion's Saved Window feature seemed clumsy to me and I'd filed my issue on Orion Tracker.
People here are mentioning that “the left” (ambiguous as to what that is) does talk about men’s issues. They then cite an article or two. I’m not sure if one article every three to six months by some publication is really “talking” about it.

For the severity of issues that men are facing, it is not getting anywhere near the coverage that it needs to be fixed. They barely scratched the surface with this article and it hardly gets into how hopeless so many young men feel. The deaths of despair being so much higher for men should be an indication of why things are not going so well for men and how they feel overall.

It doesn’t help that the resources available are also not catered towards men either. 60-70% of therapists are women and most therapists use talk therapy - which was developed to treat women. Yes, it can still help men but many therapists are under equipped to deal with how men think and act. Talk therapy is often about listening to someone talk but many men want/need therapy that involves active direction and problem solving. Talking it out just doesn’t work for many men.

Does this get talked about in the media or by “the left”? Nope. People will just parrot “go to therapy” without realizing it’s not going to help many men because the methodology doesn’t fit how men currently work.
> llm trained on literotica, anyone?

I'm not going to post links, but there are several active projects & companies already doing that.
Roughly around when the oligoculture started, and browsers stopped being "user agents", what a coincidence!

We need more browsers that focus on user features, not website features. The web is basically beyond feature-complete already, but the tools we use to interact with it are so basic. Like riding a horse on an interstate!
I'm sure there was something like this mentioned in "Managing Gigabytes" or thereabouts. It might have been using bitwise arithmetic compression which makes sense for the problem at hand.
We get it. OpenAI is a for profit company now. The "Open" in name doesn't reflect their vision anymore. Can we stop it already? Or is this some kind of rant against for profit / closed source in general?
I'm absolutely open to supporting self-hosting under some kind of enterprise license, similar to Github. If this is something you're interested in, shoot me an email and we can try it out.
This also includes buses on internal routes but within the 100 miles or so of the border. They would stop a bus and ask everyone to prove they are citizens. I know someone who overstayed their visa who was caught and extradited that way.

It’s a way for illegal immigrants to travel relatively cheaply. As opposed to driving or walking. So buses became this target.
You may be forced to pay a lot more for a static IP address. Running servers on a residential dynamic IP address can go against the ToS/AUP for some ISPs
I remain open to the question of how one should best engage with general intelligences or superintelligences (should they ever become reality.)

I just meant to say I have no interest in "consuming content" from any generative AI that is less capable and creative than a human-equivalent AGI.
Did you read the article you are commenting on? He mentions that schools don't service men very well and that most dropouts are men
The artist whose name includes Diego José Francisco de Paula Juan Nepomuceno María de los Remedios Cipriano de la Santísima Trinidad Ruiz.
"Hey, can I see all of this channel's videos, oldest-to-newest?"

"Nope. Best I can do is ROYGBIV"

"What?"

"ummm... I need your location"

That's Googlewang!
Missing Novell server discovered after four years (2001)
What kind of device? They make IP cams that push their stream to a preconfigured remote endpoint (with TLS). It would have to be a server on the public internet though, your phone probably wouldn’t work
Some clip on ferrites on the inverter cables might help.

If you have any amateur radio neighbours they'd probably love to help you with a project like this.
> Loved it, thanks for being so thorough and document the train of thought.

Glad to hear! I was hoping to make the whole process easy to follow without any large skips or prior knowledge. It is more or less my process but with a lot of dead ends removed.

> I want to ask about one thing I could not understand completely on the final section: If there was a client that sent arbitrary values for selected weapon, forward, left, etc; would the host count them as valid? (I understood this is essentially what the MITM allowed to do)

Yes, it appears so. The host seems to accept more or less arbitrary values (at least for forward, left, actions) and also just re-broadcasts them to everyone. The guest client then also ignores what it sent and just uses what it receives from the host. This allows us to modify the inputs/speed of any guest client players without desyncing the clients.

> Also, a little feedback, my immersion broke when the video did not show Howard and Ghost anymore. Something like Howard1 and Ghost1 would've helped understand a little bit more.

Good idea, I could have made it clearer which perspective the video was taken from (the guest client). Might be able to re-record or simply mention it in the text.
This sounds like LoRA but for robotics, am I teaching this right?
Maybe related to funding:

"2016 ..."

"The new project developed from funding relationships which the paper already had with the Ford, Rockefeller, and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.[171] Gates had given the organization $5 million[172] for its Global Development webpage."

(Wikipedia)
But what do we need the land for? There's tons of empty land, grazing animals are beneficial for the land. Why would we need 75% more empty land?
There's a ton of interest in it. There are forums out there that are years old with people showing off game engines, whole subreddits dedicated to the topic, too.

The problem is, it's a massively difficult undertaking to make a custom 3D game engine. Rendering alone is a huge topic without getting into the specifics of interfacing with GPU drivers. Window management is incredibly complex, especially if you want to support multiple platforms, or multiple modes of input. And then once you have all of that figured out, you still have to make some system to integrate the state of your game with all of those systems, and then finally, add your game logic on top. All while still building out those lower level systems as you go.

This is way easier to do in 2D than it is in 3D, largely because most people have a better grasp of 2D geometry than 3D, but even just making something OG Mario Bros. needs a fairly substantial game engine. Sure you can code golf it into something tiny, but then you don't have an engine, you have a game program. Engines need a certain level of flexibility to explore.

And sure, there are libraries for doing all of those things, but wiring them up together often ends up with piles of adapter code between the libraries to let them all use each other's data structures, at which point natural groupings of libraries form, and you're effectively back to having a game engine, just by defacto standard instead of intentional assembly.
The Intern and the Coach
I love the nominative determinism. He was an early buyer.
IMO this article is in response to the controversy generated as a result of the August 7 YouTube video by Shoe0nHead, The Male Loneliness Epidemic[0]. The video got a lot of heat on Twitter and other social media places. Right wing commentators on YouTube had a lot of positive responses. A follow-up [1] was uploaded 2 days prior to the article.

[0] https://youtu.be/rQv8VuLpKN4

[1] https://youtu.be/qVKvEaokV6I
Nix-Darwin is nice module system for macOS as well. It's a bit older than Home Manager, and also supports configuring some macOS-specific and systemwide settings.
No, they are actually forbidden from doing that. They should stop illegal migrants, that is a different action and different people. To stop invaders we have an army.
That time is an intersection of heavy home use and when the dew hits.
Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi
They do, but they also vote in politicians who don't really do much to help those issues beyond giving them lip service.

Multiple Democratic presidents have not done anything substantial to address some of the issues you mentioned. Not saying that the GOP is better, they are objectively far worse. But the Democrats have squandered every chance to really help this country in meaningful drastic ways.

Shit, Biden was THE biggest friend to Corporate America while he was in the senate, and that didn't stop while he was VP, nor as President. You think someone who was completely bought and paid for by the healthcare lobby was going to allow Obama to deploy a government-backed healthcare option, instead of the mess we got with the ACA?
It is one of the reasons I self-identify as an independent now, instead of a lifelong liberal. Somewhere along the line the left decided that the best way to achieve equality was to drag down the 'privileged' rather than elevating the disadvantaged.

And they continue to wonder why the right has enjoyed such a resurgence across the world. Looking for any reason, any explanation that does not require a mirror.
> what's the failure mode for G1/ZGC in this scenario?

GC barriers (special code that gets triggered on some operations by some GCs, such as when mutating a reference field during a GC cycle -- that's a "write barrier").

Concurrent GCs have special rules for newly allocated objects (which are really just a pointer bump) because no one else has seen them yet; young objects require no GC barriers. But once an object is old, a concurrent GC needs to do some work to learn about references in the object changing. So while allocating a new object is usually a pointer bump (and sometimes not even that when the object is scalarized), mutating an old object triggers a GC slow-path that has to mark some data in a shared data structure (so we're talking memory ordering fences) to make sure that the mutated pointer is not overlooked by the GC.

OpenJDK's new GCs are really, very, very good. The new generational ZGC in JDK 21 (with sub-millisecond worst case pause) is just amazing. But these GCs are optimised for "reasonable" Java code and against "unreasonable" object pooling. Things are different from where they were a decade ago in Java 8.
I was being charitable and interpreting it as referring to any type of media usage.

Agreed that the race to the bottom of low-quality stimulus content is a (probably separate) problem, since that trend was well underway long before generative AI.
What is categorically false?
> And I'm not saying Signal doesn't have its issues (meatspace identity tied to your number etc) but it's far superior to WhatsApp which collects too much metadata like, it knows your contacts, when you talk to them, IP and other metadata.

Signal also collects your contacts and it permanently stores that data in the cloud along with your name, photo, and phone number. If didn't know they were doing that, that alone should tell you how much you can trust Signal.
Complete non-sequitur since I said nothing about restricting anyone's freedom to say anything. I was critiquing your attitude. Attitude.
Humans can indeed be taken apart piece by piece and put back together again. We just don't have that level of technology yet. There's nothing physically stopping it from happening though.
Want full time Michael Caine voice.
Java and Rust have similar goals, you can see it in the design of the language and the ecosystem. I lived in the early Java ecosystem and the Rust ecosystem has a similar vibe. They were both attacking the same problem but were are products of their respective times. The key difference is that Rust was able to learn from Java's mistakes and make ambitious technical bets that would not have been feasible at the time Java was designed. Java was invented when most serious applications were written in C and sometimes early versions of C++. It eliminated much of the conceptual complexity that made it difficult for all but the best developers to be productive in C or C++. In this Java was a massive success, it was easy to scale development even if you didn't have the world's best engineers.

Java's mistake is that they went much too far when they nerfed the language. For highly skilled developers that could write robust C or C++, the poor expressiveness of Java made many easy things difficult or impossible. It was clearly a language designed with business logic in mind, any systems-y software was an afterthought. The release of C++11 ushered in the era of "modern" C++, killing Java's momentum in the systems-y software space.

Rust, in my view, attempts to solve the same abstract problem as Java -- we will never produce enough developers that are competent at writing C or C++. Rust talks about "safety by design" in the same way Java did when it was first released. However, it does so without being so limited that highly skilled software engineers will find the language unusable or giving up so much runtime performance that the operational economics are poor. In my mental taxonomy, Rust is pretty close to what Java intended to be but then never quite delivered on.
The prospect of robots able to manipulate liquids, cloth and other tricky materials shows how dexterous they're becoming. Major milestone. Exciting stuff!
It's been a liberal publication for a long time. I think you might have it backwards though. If the Overton window shifts right, then The Atlantic would be considered more liberal, wouldn't it? If anything, some of the other journalistic institutions jumped the shark a bit from 2015-2020, which might make The Atlantic look more centrist than it really is, though it remains fundamentally liberal.
Yeah, but it buys 3 senior consultants, and they’re a fixed cost/capital expense and can be cut at any time. Operationally, it’s not that expensive to keep a Terraform platform floating. It’s expensive to build, and most companies need it yesterday. But bring in 3 people to support a team to build it in a year, then cut them free when it’s in v1, and leave your team to iterate and update. And now you’re not paying $1mm a year or more after that forever.
Too many left policies create unhappiness? You do have a szrange definition of left. Just a hint, the USSR was rightfully called Stalinistic and the Vommunist. Ehile China is a one party totalitarian regime that only recently is curbing down capitalism. None of which are representative of left politics like pro-union, social security, health care and the like.
Shut up and accept what? A company being closed source / for profit? Are we rioting against capitalism or something? Should I get my pitchforks? Just to be sure, we'll include literally all major tech companies, or is only OpenAI the target?
TFA doesn't say, but another comment linked to an article that says

"After being thwarted by Congress, President Joe Biden will use his executive authority to create a New Deal-style American Climate Corps"

which means there is no new spending here.