skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Webhooks are fun to think about. A couple more issues off the top of my head:

* Ordering. Since network requests can take variable amounts of time, how do you ensure those two "foo.updated" events are processed in order, or that the receiver can tell their order? Especially something to consider if the webhooks will retry a few times on intermittent failures.

* Consistency. Always a concern in distributed microservice land, but maybe more acute when generating webhooks right as things are updated: if the receiver uses the webhook to make an API request right back into the system, will the API have the same view of the data?

* DDoS. How do you make sure the webhook destination URL is owned by the subscriber? If your system can generate high volumes of webhook traffic, that could be a problem.

* Infinite loops. A silly one, but the user could conceivably point the webhook at a URL of the system that sends the webhook, in such a way that it will cause a new webhookable event to be generated.
Incorrect - I 100% believe that UAP are real phenomena, and that there are strong military and science cases for investigating them. I am annoyed at all the enthusiastic people actively presuming that it's aliens. Like... that's in no way a reasonable null assumption, and until strong evidence shows otherwise it's actively harmful and counterproductive. Meanwhile it's a substantial moneymaker for a lot of people, which is still more grating.
https://www.tensorflow.org/install/pip#windows-native
I don't necessarily agree with OP. I would point to compiler / toolchain first. Not every program will have syscalls, threads, signals, etc, etc

I will say that a huge subset of C programs involve low level interactions. I know some talented developers that feel disagree, but I wouldn't use C otherwise (though there are probably other use cases). ie. basically never

In which case you are somewhat of a hardware / kernal / OS programmer. The lower layers will matter. In the PC world this might be abstracted away. I haven't heard of many developers diving into eg. a modern Intel x86, at a hardware level (but perhaps write some ASM).

C also works well for embedded systems. In which case you likely have a compiler and have to interact with low level hardware and peripherals.

So I will say in the long run you will need to learn these things. My education in C involved writing code for linux system; that's how it's taught to CS/SWE people.

On the computer / electric front, you would work with an embedded platform. In either case you'll learn useful things and will be able to jump back and forth... but there will be some substantial differences in your specialized knowledge.
Have had similar experiences on iPhones. Multiple native apps can stay in memory and play nice with each other for indefinite periods, but then I need to go visit a heavy website for some reason or another and it starts booting apps out of memory. It’s ridiculous.
It's possible Roswell is known to be nothing while modern UAPs are still unexplained.
I would get the pro for the 120hz screen alone
And an iPad Air costs between $600 and $800. If you want to hit a lower price point, it makes sense to just put less stuff inside. "The case isn't full" is not a metric that anyone should give a whit about, as long as the size of the case is determined by other factors (in this case, the dimensions of the screen).
What is interesting about this post? It's just a sad consumeristic page, I never done a reply like this, but this really has nothing of value if not as a reminder of the emptiness of modern society
Pig kidney works a record 2 months in donated body
best is subjective.
The law is from 2018. And described exactly what was forbidden for underage children privacy. The fact that Ticktock didn't comply until 2021 is their own fault.
How people act is often different from how they say they act. Women can be attracted to taller men without knowing that is a factor much less admitting it.

I have no idea if women really are attracted to taller men, but I know what you hear people say isn't the whole truth either.
I'm one of the engineers at Bluesky that handles incoming security reports. We of course do take reported security issues very seriously. We have worked positively with a number of researchers.

The initial email in this case was received on a Friday afternoon, reviewed briefly for severity, and then acknowledged on the following Tuesday. There was a reply from another engineer on Wednesday to a reply by the reporter.

But we certainly could have followed-up better, and we could have been more clear. We're a very small team and the severity was deemed low, but even so we'll try to do better in the future for similar cases.

We do want to handle these kinds of reports better than most companies do. Creating a safe and secure system for users (which include our own families and friends) is something the team very genuinely cares deeply about.
the amount of stuff you cram in also affects the weight (as well as the price)
I'm glad Dawkins has not got into social epistemology. His reasoning seems very clear.

For comparison here is some Asta, where the jargon leaves me unclear at what she is saying:

>Gender is a paradigm case for me. However, even if we assume that my account does justice to the construction of gender, the question remains whether this notion of social construction and social meaning is really adequate for accounting for the metaphysics of all social categories of individuals. Perhaps the two aims pull in opposite direction here: theorizing the type of social construction involved with gender, on the one hand, and offering a general metaphysics of social categories of individuals, on the other.,
Yes, I didn't read the comment carefully and quickly assumed it was the standard question about including the decompressor.
They used to - back in the android 4 days there was strong competition and a number of flagship devices.

I’m assuming it’s somewhat of a chicken and egg combined with googles inability to invest in growing products. No one makes good android tablet apps, so there’s a no reason to make android tablets, so there’s no reason to invest in android tablet apps.
Another research project needed to uncover such basics
As I understand it, Tiktok changed their practices a few years ago. This fine is just for what their practices were before that, and the prosecution just took a few years to resolve.
I'm not saying that they don't exist, but that they add so little (due to mostly just being nothing but another variation of the same handful of planet types with norhing to do there), that they might as well not exist.
ARM could simply not have established itself as dominate if they would try to capture all that value, when there were competitors who wouldn't demand even more.

If ARM makes the 'mobile phone' ecosystem possible, ARM should get money from each call? How would you even capture that. Not even the company who produces the phones gets that money.

ARM already gets royalties on each chip sold.
I have not opened the ticket. I though I should understand bit more. Is it a bug/feature-request to be opened (Sharing clipboard with guest VM)?
How it should be handled? any thoughts?
It’s so crazy that people in a desperate effort to get clicks will look at a spec that is used by no one and go “this number is lower, therefore bad!”

Cool, now the internet thinks that matters. Let me know the next time you plug your phone into a computer.
> "companies are legally forced to maximise profit" has never been true

It's more like too hard to be proven in any way. Unless you live in an simulator it's really hard to say which set of decisions is better than another. People often say it is obvious or in hindsight but fact is there are no such hard proofs.
It’s a private company… to whatever theoretical extent he’s beholden to the majority of the shareholders with potential board of directors and shareholder meeting shenanigans … that majority of shareholders is himself… and I’m pretty sure he’s ok with his own decisions…
Excellent take.

People think that making good games is cheap and anyone can do.

Making games, maybe. Good ones? I don’t think so.
I've looked at the picture but well, I can't see anything. IANAArcheologist :-(
Why 1 sales person? Last agency I worked for had like 25 people dedicated to sales and everyone in leadership of every discipline participated in pitches. We did something on the order of $50MM/year.

I'd strongly caution against productizing unless you have inputs telling you customers want it. It was tried at every agency I've worked at and failed every time.
> It’s amazing how more and more organizations are stating this is a real thing

It's amazing how exaggerated claims like that are. When you try to track down these organizations saying "ayy lmaos are real" you actually come up with organizations saying things like "the video is real" (and incidentally, shows an airliner 30 miles away) or "there are UAP" (translation: "It's an areal phenomena that we can't identify because the video quality is shit, and we certainly don't have any reason to conclude that it's aliens but we're going to call it a UAP because that's literally what it is.")

The direct claims of it being aliens are all coming from obviously batshit kooks repeating things they claim they heard other people say. e.g. David Grusch.
The implication is that Moore might potentially be able to pull the same move, releasing the watchmen, top 10, v characters into the public domain
What no UFO believer seems to be able to answer is the very simple question of Why?

Why would an alien society advanced enough to travel here even bother to do so? If they would bother, why send a manned craft? Why send a craft big enough to be spotted by humans?

Eliezer Yudkowsky made a big post about this a while back, where he lays out the very sensible reasons that UFOs being explained by aliens makes no sense. (yes, i know, EY is annoying, I disclaim in advance all necessary disclaimers about him. He's right about this, at least).

https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1682446903953457152
To stay with the fond analogy: It gets interesting if the fond preparation involves deglazing a pan (mutable environment) with meat bits and juices left at the bottom (state/precondition). Two options:

- Linear code: The meat frying (state-producing) and deglazing (state-requiring) steps are below each other in the same recipe, so to verify that it works you can just linearly go through line by line. However if the recipe becomes long and a lot of stuff happens in between, it's no longer obvious. You'll have to use good comments ("// leave residue in the pan, we'll need it for the fond") because otherwise you might accidentally refactor in a way that violates the precondition (swaps/scrubs the pan).

- Modular code: You need to clearly describe the precondition on the fond preparation subroutine to have any chance to keep using it correctly. On one hand this forces documentation, on the other hand it's probably still easier to forget since the subroutine call ("Prepare the fond.") doesn't directly make the precondition obvious.

Either way has its advantages and drawbacks, and the right choice depends on the circumstances.
This is assuming you only want to cook this specific meal and aren't writing a cookbook - otherwise you should definitely modularize to remove repetition.
Izimi: Free, ultra-secure digital space
Most of the abstraction between disk and container is external to K8s. You can use a single box CPU+disk with K8s if you want, that's just not a configurable product offering, so that's not how any of the cloud providers expose disk. K8s itself is entirely unconcerned with most of the implementation details, it's more a framework for those kinds of things
Data that is gathered informally with crappy handheld equipment will always be of very poor quality.

If you want to find out what, if anything, is out there then you need a systematic process of gathering data using calibrated equipment and a robust subsequent analysis of that data.

We don't do astronomy by pointing our iPhones at the sky either.
YouTube Shorts are also full of underage kids talking about their life, dancing and whatnot. Does not feel right to me, but I guess it is for YouTube.
> For many developers it is now cheaper to switch the engine than to pay for Unity.

Only for a (possibly very) small minority.

I find the the fact that they had no qualms about retroactively applying this to already released game much more infuriating (if they did this, what can they do next?). The pricing itself seems fairly reasonable if make more $1.5-2 or so per user (compared to Unreal anyway).
I think digital foundry mentioned each planet has one main attraction/city and not much else outside of that. I could see how that would put a damper on exploration.
I think if that's the case, the fines will have to be increased until we reach a point where they succeed at their task of disincentivizing this behavior.
That's a fair question, and that's why I didn't build out everything I had in mind (trends, AI based suggestions, etc), I just put together the best MVP I could in a week and put it out there.
Yeah, but the checks start clearing again, right now.
Do you have an affiliate program? I'd be interested:)
He did? Is insider trading laws in the US non-existant? Wow
Root cause analysis is complex for a reason. Separating out contributing causes from root causes is difficult and sometimes even impossible.

Would this dam have failed eventually? Probably yes, on a long enough time-scale. Would it have failed now if not for that storm? Probably no.

Note that even in the developed West there are plenty of pieces of infrastructure at risk because of climate driven extremities.
> Yes, that's why I said "part owned".

Which doesn't really matter unless you'll lose control. If 1 entity has >50% it's pretty safe.
Well, no, but how would a good tablet bring them a large enough increase in ad revenue to make it worth the investment? That’s what the difference in business models naturally leads to, right? There’s no indication that Google is trying to change what kind of company they are, is there?
Yes you can. But unless you're a AAA developer studio, it's ridiculously infeasible. At least for Godot, there would be a community effort to maintain it. Such a community would be impossible with any closed-source (even if readable) engine.
The linear version is hard to test. The split-function one is much more testable. There is also that thing called complexity, which increase with function length and has been proved to correlate with bugs count.

The problem with the example is that it is both extremely artificial and shows a single use case. Even with the artificiality, one can easily imagine baking a calzone instead, which could reuse all the factored-out oven functions in the split version.

(The comment about pizza vs baked pizza is one about using typing to encode your logic, but is separate from the issue that your functions should do one thing.)
I don’t think the crossover is bound to happen. With Web Components the browsers went all-in on ideas about components that made sense in the early 2010s, but then couldn’t evolve them because they had already standardized. In practice most component libraries don’t use Web Components under the hood (yes, I know Angular does if you tell it to, in practice I’ve never seen anyone use this) and aren’t polyfills. The main framework that worked that way (Polymer) has been out of use for years.
I also find peoples generatal non-response strange, though, I don't find Grusch's testimony that compelling: he didn't actually see anything, or really have any evidence. I find the US Navy pilot observations to be both more credible, and more interesting. Those I know who have looked into it, both IRl and online, both seem to take any debunking of the videos by Mick West to be the final word on the subject, but to me the videos are just short views into much longer encounters viewed by multiple people.

The response of the public at large seems both muted, and a bit off. US Navy pilots claim to see UFOs? The response largely seems to be "They're just Chinese spy balloons or something, who cares, yawn". But then actual Chinese spy balloons show up and the public/media loses their minds over it.
Ugh, first I'm hearing of this. Some of that is my fault; I'm using Marl's* news aggregator which craps up the default feed with celebs and sportsball. I've had it set to National to avoid drowning in fluff-poo.

I need to invest in a better news supplier.

*ref: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37509507

Response to the disaster is slow, partially due to disaster response being sucked into the massive need of Morocco earthquake zone.

I wish the West was set up where we could volunteer family members to relief efforts (without loss of income > homelessness).
They changed their practice in 2021, after 3 years. The fine is for the 2018-2021 infraction over all of the EU.
Perhaps it’s for CarPlay integration? iirc cars record this data nowadays
This question strikes me as bizarre. What is the causal relationship between the goodness of a tablet and what its inside looks like?
Major difference being, you'd be hard pressed to find many folks who would call David Grusch "not trustworthy". Smith had already been convicted of "glass looking" to find buried treasure by the time he claimed to find these golden plates. Further, how many of the witnesses were not related? Lastly, how many of the witnesses later explained that their "vision" of the plates was in the spiritual realm, not the physical?

If David Grusch had showed up with a bunch of family members who claimed to have seen UAPs being dismantled with their "spiritual eyes", then perhaps I'd put his testimony on par with Joseph Smith (and Oliver Cowdrey and David Whitmer)
Personal anecdote- Neither my M1 Air (personal) or M2 Pro (work) have any trouble with docker and jetbrains. Fans don't even turn on on the M2.

Both have apple silicon builds now, but it and a lot of other software built for Intel ran at similar performance or better (compared to Intel MacBook / Thinkpad).

I understand why people hate apple, but I've never heard anyone say this (what op said) who has had similar setups. It works a hell of a lot better than my X1 Carbon did.
The perfect 3-letter-induced psy-op (or maybe even 4 letters, if we were to let NASA in on this). Interesting how alien life has only bothered presenting itself as UFOs over the territory of the United States, people from other parts of the world don’t seem to have the same obsession (and back when they had it was mostly via US media and movies anyway)
Did you allow their apps access to photos? That would likely be the largest sized data set on the phone. Maybe they also send similar data for ads. Constant scrolling of the "feed" might require a lot of that content to be on your phone so it could be caching things.

Meta/Facebook is known to slurp up all kinds of data off peoples phones - location data, listening to the mic, etc. has been alleged in the past, possibly proven in court. You could try only using their website which I believe puts them in a sandbox where they can't send/receive as much. Or uninstalling it and not using it would mean 0 traffic to them from your router.
At lower price points I’d probably be looking for a smaller tablet where the battery is better matched with the screen size so battery life isn’t terrible.
Even then, if the shareholders approve of trashing the company with ice cream parties (had to get rid of the illegality of cocaine for this point) there's nothing inherently wrong or illegal with that.

As long as the executives are behaving generally how the shareholders want, it's not a problem.
What's New in DevTools (Chrome 118)
Interesting to know, thank you. They seem to mostly use this to adjust the frequency of the induced current in the stator, as they control the rotation speed of a "virtual rotor" (rotation of the rotor + rotation of the magnetic field around the rotor).

That's indeed similar, but in the wind turbine use-case, the stator is passive. A direct application could be to tune the torque/speed response, or improve motor weight by reducing the number of coils on one of the elements.
I stumbled on this solution to a problem I didn't even know I had! I wanted to fork and modify an NPM package that's in the subdirectory of a monorepo. But NPM (the tool) can't directly import from a git subdirectory, it has to be imported via NPM (the package repository).

One solution would be to make your own package repository on GH and publish the fork there, but that's a big hassle. With GitPkg it's a one-liner in your package.json.

Peeking at the source code, very interesting implementation too, with streaming tar files. That helps explain how a service like this can be provided for free.

(Looks unrelated to this "gitpkg" from a few years back: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18009759)
>I'm increasingly of the opinion that the permanent seats are stupid and shouldn't be so

>a whole bunch of reasons why the permanent seats aren't representative

You're spot on that they aren't representative of the world's interests, but that's because this isn't what the security council is really for.

Taught in geopolitical terms, the UN is the latest iteration of a number of bodies that seek to protect a small alliance's interests in the long term.

The UN was founded by the winners of WWII, in the brief moment of time they could credibly claim that they represented the broader world's interests. Since then, the WWII allies - US/UK/France/Russia/China - have maintained their disproportionate positions to protect their own interests.

The Security council exists for them - it is the only body that can pass legally binding resolutions, it gatekeeps access to the general assembly, and those 5 golden keyholders can individually veto any other UN action.

These kind of bodies (UN, League of Nations, Peace of Westphalia) etc are often couched in ideals and often do have sub-bodies who do excellent work, as the UN does, but in reality, at the highest levels, are actually consider the spoils of war: the right to dictate your position as a lasting member of extraterritorial governance and protect your doctrinal and national interests.
If match didn't understand this already they were pretty stupid. I think the blame lies 100% on the people at OKC who sold out.
Not the pdfs created by DC. But someone probably can republish Fables, maybe or maybe not using the DC version as a source, and you can download that legally.
The OG IPad:
https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Image/meta/y5HAM4cflO64B3QH
I really appreciate your project this was really good
> What makes JS frameworks so quick to change? … What's the urge to reinvent rather than evolve?

There’s a really low barrier to entry for creating and sharing JS packages. Basically, you can just create a free account on npm and run “npm publish” to make a library available globally for free. Updates are just as easy, and using packages is even easier.

It’s this super low-friction of JS development that drives the ecosystem to constantly iterate. And it even allows solo developers - like ^ this one - to publish and share a new framework.

I haven’t tried to publish packages for Java, Go, Python etc… but I would be very surprised if it’s as easy and unrestricted as npm…
> Why would an alien society advanced enough to travel here even bother to do so? If they would bother, why send a manned craft? Why send a craft big enough to be spotted by humans?

Imagine a chimpanzee in some remote jungle asking themselves the same question about "alien" humans.
Just read the original article[0]. I apologize if I misstated anything in it.

[0]http://web.archive.org/web/20100725135309/http://blog.okcupi...
We need nVidia and AMD to help godot engine to get the high end things in Unreal engine.

I'd love academics working on 3D to submit things that can roll into godot.