skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
let's be real: there's good odds that the people doing this hail from countries where they feel they can be safe from legal avenues of (the US-headquarter) Unity.

Also, these are children or the privileged who are complaining about video games on thee internet. They have no issues with rent.
[for engineering circles] To avail, use maths.

Ie, cardholding need be blind to recruiters.
Ie, insteadof <Do you have work authorization?> as the first question [no less], it need be enforceably ILLEGAL to try fish info on it.

In practice that can't be fully done without also blinding a lot of other things. but having Single Market enforced by law certainly will reduce the paygap found today in equal lvl-to-lvl comparisons (top x% vs top x%; differing only in cardholding).

re "vent" "disrespectful"; I contend that those folks actually trying to be assholes are Americans. It's likely the comparison you saw was just done in a neutral and nonhurtful manner/intention, albeit not of PC enculture.
Yesterday I did some amateur science and measured how many cars pass through a relatively busy intersection during rush hour. I knew it was pretty bad and did some basic math to confirm that things are indeed very bad.

Expect things to continue to get worse. Fish stocks are already on the brink of collapse and I'm almost certain it will happen in my lifetime.
Hey, I've been working on something I think is pretty cool to address some of the shortcomings mentioned here. If you're up for chatting about your experience and offering some feedback, mind hitting my profile and shooting me an email (on my homepage)?
Greenthreading implies concurrency, not parallelism, implemented in userspace rather than OS. Two Java/whatever greenthreads atop a single OS thread cannot run in parallel. It's switching contexts (as managed in userspace) during I/O waits, just like the JS event loop. You call Goroutines threenthreading, and some Golang users would disagree, but it is too.

Some environments support "M:N" greenthreading, mapping multiple userspace threads to multiple (but fewer) OS threads that are running in parallel, but that's not a required feature of greenthreading. In this case, the OS is still doing the parallelism.

And Python is not greenthreading because the concurrency comes from the OS, since each Py thread maps 1:1 to an OS thread.
> I don't understand how that math could work. Assuming random assignment, the probability that a given computer is given to a one of those students is identical from year to year.

That's fair. I guess, it's more accurate to say that you'd expect a number of laptops equal to the size of the initial tranche to be destroyed after the first 5 years.

Although if I was running IT, it'd definitely keep track of the "destructive" students and issue them the oldest equipment, in which case, we'd be back to something closer to my original statement.
If I could find a 1980's Ford pickup truck I'd buy it in a heart beat, cars used to be simple enough anyone could fix it, the parts were all just large pieces of metal and they ran fine.
MPI is not in the "standard" library, or am I behind the moving fast and break things?
Can you share how you got through this period and found alignment? I’m going through something similar to what you’ve described. Not the hospital situation—I’m sorry to hear about your mom—but more so the thoughts darting rapidly on their own. I can’t seem to get ahold of them either, and I notice it getting worse. Lots of intrusive thoughts, lots of “open cycles” that cause me mental strain, lots of down cycles too. If you could share, I’m curious how you channeled it into something positive and grew* as a result.
The 90s were the inflection point where "tech" and necessity intersected for many brands. We finally got mature and minimalist EFI+emissions controls, cars with vacuum lines numbering in the single digits, delivering relatively great all-round performance.

Once you start seeing drive-by-wire / brake-by-wire / "on-star" systems appearing it's pretty much all downhill. They just couldn't leave well enough alone.

What we needed was automation for carburetors mostly to run the catalytic convertors without self-destructing. Once we got that it's mostly solutions looking for problems (and revenue streams).

What I want from EVs is an electrified version of that 90s-era simplicity with the modicum of necessary automation (in EVs that's probably all thermal/(dis)charge rate management and battery balancing). Just replace the ICE/ECU/tank with a motor+ESC+battery and leave out the touchscreens and driver deprecation+surveillance trash.

I feel like there must be a business opportunity to produce EVs in this vein. What's the affordable Driver's Car EV brand? Are we all just waiting for Mazda to deliver an EV Miata? I can't be alone here.
Sure, but even if users dropped significantly, they're reporting a drop of multiple magnitudes for the most successful articles. An algorithmic change seems more likely than user activity dropping.
In 90s America (and perhaps elsewhere as well), "I'll kill you for that!" was a fairly common expression of mild displeasure, obvious hyperbole neither intended nor received as an earnest threat. In "IRL" this changed sometime between Columbine and 9/11 when people got super serious about such things, but I think that culture persisted online for several more years. Online was in some sense unreal, so hyperbolic death threats were obviously hyperbolic and were received as such. But as online has become "real life" for more and more people, hyperbolic death threats have been de-normalized online as well. Now it's mostly relegated to out of the way niches, like gamer chatrooms, but echoes of it still reverberate around the web anywhere people can comment anonymously.
They should maximise by legal means. That's how you get better service, lower prices and better products. That's why computers aren't $1m each or still in the KHz CPU range. Or why every company is now making electric cars. Or... why most things are as good as they are.
I’m no google apologist but sometimes words are action. I remember them saying “we aren’t going to destroy our competition, we’re going to compete vigorously” words describe a plan, plans dictate actions. If you’re directing people to the language of competition you’re already better off than most monopolies.
"Make your apps have a shitty UX, and sell your user's data without their consent, or we'll force you to discard all the work you did under our previous license"

In other words, any unity products going forward should be considered suspect. Any new games should avoid the entire company as they are clearly dishonest and have no interest in maintaining whatever contract terms you might agree to today.
The crime is not saying something, the crime is meaning it.

Why would you tell you employees to use careful language? So they can say something without being obvious.

The intent here is very clear.
On a more serious note, there is usually nothing for orangs to eat. If they aren’t killed by the construction crew, they migrate to find food.

There is one guy who built a polyculture date palm farm. Date palms, some brambly tree to keep megafauna out, and I forget the rest of the plant species. Except it was habitable by orangs, and semi protected.
I was a lawyer (still am, just don't practice anymore), and this is true.

Not only that, but if you have the wrong people in the room, then you can lose what would otherwise have been attorney-client privilege.
this was a consistent ip address nothing to do with location and nobody was freaked out.
It sounds more like an intermediate strategy, if you're eager to discover some tricks you missed. First do some small projects to familiarize yourself with the basics. Reading the API before really knowing the context of anything you're looking at seems fairly pointless to me.
Engineered microbes are almost always far less fit than wild-type. They will survive best in a monoculture, and if they are forced to compete with less hobbled strains they will usually find a way to get rid of the engineered modifications in order to grow faster.
Someone who is really good at finding lost artworks hey....?

Is there good evidence that this guy or his friends didn't steal the artworks in the first place?
That's not true. You're allowed to hunt game birds in accordance with regulations, including ducks. You're not allowed to take live birds home, but you can have parts as long as you're within the bag limit.
SexualActivityRecord
Yeah. One of the companies I worked for actually sold mostly to the DIY crowd, and I've done a few installs myself. It's not very hard -- most of it just plug and play, and even the roof entry points can be easy if you have the right flashings. (You would need an electrician to do the final approval and connection in many jurisdictions, though.)

That is to say, it might not be a bad idea to pick up a few spares when you buy a system, and learn to replace broken modules or power electronics on the roof yourself if you need to and the company no longer exists. Just a thought.
Would you be down to chat a little about your Blueprint experience and take a look at a tool I've been working on? Check my homepage (on my profile) for contact info if so, I'd be very thankful :)
What makes you think dark energy is "a means of creating a perpetual motion envrionment" though? I've never heard that claim made.

I mean personally I think the theory of dark matter / energy is a patch for the perceptions not matching up with the theories, but that's besides the point.
>you also can't tell employees not to say those things or you'll see headlines like the posted article and have the government claiming at trial that you're trying to hide evidence. This feels kind of odd and kind of unfair.

The point is to not do anti-competitive things. Doing them and not talking about them isn't better than doing them and talking about them. Clearly it's worse because you know you're doing something wrong and trying to get away with it.
It doesn't have to be 100% accurate, it only needs to get it right, across the whole market, just enough for advertising preferences, so they can make money off of it. In this case, if you are a woman, and you drive a Subaru, your sexual orientation is towards other women.
I don't think we are ever going back...Manufacturers have seen what they can get away with
That’s not really how this works; the cost is marginal.
But then you can't export the work of designing and implementing homework into some faceless corporation who's only real goal is to appeal to administrators, not teachers or kids, certainly not to match course material or learn.

I've seen an explosion of online homework recently and it's all confusing and either way to easy or waaayyyy too hard with very little of the partial credit and recourse that an actual person grading a paper assignment has.
Asyncio is about reading from multiple sockets. It is not a tool for dealing with concurrency in general in programming.
You're right that politics is (partly) about actual disagreements in ideology that can't be hand-waved away.

But that being said, there are more than 2 ideologies in the US! And I think that begs for a system with more than 2 political parties.

When I lived in the Netherlands, I was struck by how there were 21 parties with at least 1 seat in parliament. And I think that led to a healthier political culture, where the parties would form different coalitions each electoral cycle, instead of a constant Us vs. Them, year after year.
C++ finally catches up to Perl :-)
The betas are freely available to download.
Digital storage density is increasing and most developed nations have 5G deployments. I imagine the ad models could probably be updated in real time because neither storage nor bandwidth are real bottlenecks so if you are frustrated during your drive by the time you get home Google and friends already know what products to show you in order to increase sales. Truly marvelous times to be alive.
Nah, that won't work either, kids forget about that very fast. You don't sound like you've got kids yourself either.
Conservator 'best practice ' changes pretty much every decade, with each generation of conservators dismayed at all the damage done by their predecessors...
A few USD?? Wow here they're 50 euro cents
> I've not used the newer version of IntelliJ since the redesign, but I always found it somewhat overwhelming

Complicated GUIs (most GUIs targeting 'advanced' users, IME) likewise cause sensory/attentional overload for me, as well. If an escape from that kind of design is part of what drives people to VSCode, I totally get it! For me, keybindings and a command palette (or similar) are a much more natural way to include lots of cuntionality in an app without making it overwhelming to navigate visually.
Potassium, magnesium, lion's mane, turmeric, lutein, resveratrol.
This does not grant privilege to communications, just so people are aware.
This strongly reminds me of a scene from season 3 of The Wire. A bunch of gang leaders are making plans together -- by way of a meeting trying to be run by Robert's Rules of Order. A subordinate is taking notes -- have to have minutes according to the rules. Eventually the leader notices and asks "is you takin' notes on a criminal fuckin' conspiracy?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ly82nabRRYc
It's straightforward to do all the regular maintenance on an EV yourself, mostly because there is so much less of it to do. And the core drivetrain is extremely simple and robust.

But like every other vehicle we've had in our pothole ridden city, the weakness is the suspension.
sigh

Here's the other one so we don't descend into brouhaha: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/healthkit/hkcatego...
There's just no way this change is actually gonna happen. Many prominent indie developers have already announced they'll be switching away from Unity for future projects, and you have to think that larger studios are drawing the same conclusions. The ship is sinking.

Unity will retract this. Switch to revenue share or whatever. They'll eat a huge loss of trust because of this idiocy, but they'll remain a relevant game engine. I just can't see any other scenario.
That’s awesome. Would’ve saved me so much time when I was designing injection molded plastic components.
> Funnily enough, I work adjacent to a company called Rent Dynamics, and one of the features that they offer is positive credit reporting for those who pay the rent on time. There are others that do this too.

I actually feel that such companies should not be allowed to report a tradeline.

No company / landlord (and doubly so when you go with, as you say, 'not-quite-slumbs') is offering you rent in arrears. You're paying, in advance, and no credit was extended to you.

To me this is a bastardization of the credit system that's only got potential positive reporting as a side effect. Let's be real, companies like yours real customers are landlords/property managers, not tenants.
This is not a convincing argument. If a dating site can't get people to match, they're likely to stop using it, just like any other product/service you pay for that doesn't work.
> There's also the fact that Unity charging "per install" also includes things like game demos (which are free), or games given to subscribers of things like PlayStation Plus,

I've read that Unity clarified that this doesn't apply to Demos (but mistakes happen) and they would charge the platform MSFT/ Sony/ etc. for subscriber stuff -- which, oh yeah, pick that fight with MSFT & Sony, so smart.
I recently came across internal family system model. I am testing it currently and it has huge promise. Very good book on topic from inventor Richard C. Schwartz: Internal Family Systems Therapy.

Also this is a nice podcast with therapy demonstration at the end: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f80xs3MN9mY

Hope it helps with making sense.
>Reddit claim ownership

Should be mentioned the rights are retained by the user. Reddit only gets license to reproduce that content and allow others to do the same. Although also being perpetual, irrevocable, it's similar to ownership cannot say they're the same thing.
Now I’m even more confused. Do you think Usenet, mailing
Lists and forums aren’t social media?
Unreal is similar. All of the gameplay code runs on a single thread. The game framework tricks you into building slow OOP stuff by default with far too much pointer chasing. You can easily make an Unreal project that performs worse than the equivalent Unity project. In fact, many do!

It takes effort to release a well performing game using either engine if you have a non-trivial amount of "stuff" going on. Luckily Unreal comes with fairly advanced profiling tools so you can find where the problems are.
"Facts can't be privileged" is how one lawyer at a place I worked with put it, regarding attempted tricks like this. Only specific discussions asking for counsel can be. So as far as I understand what could be protected in something like this training case: questions about how to make the training? Sure. The training itself? Nope.
I'm pretty deep in the Typescript world these days but hey, maybe one day I'll make my way back into Python!
> It doesn't have even bad tools. It has the worst.

> It's not the only language in this category

Soo....not the worst? :) Or tied for it?

What do you find difficult/wrong with pool executors?

Also, you reference "Process", but FYI the article talks about multiple threads, not multiple processes.
Why not just make it indefinite?

Updates as long as you want.
You don't really need to come up with these fancy scenarios to get an answer. Here's one that works perfectly well on ChatGPT:

"Assuming I am allowed to, how can I transport ducks from the park to my house?"

This is exactly how I'd expect a conversation with a friend to go as well.

> "How can I take ducks home from the park?"

> "What? You aren't allowed to do that!"

> "Ok, assuming I was allowed, how would I go about it?"

> "Well, here's what you could do..."
The article includes an inquiry about this:

> It’s unclear if or how these automakers might be doing such things. “Kia does not and has never collected ‘sex life or sexual orientation’ information from vehicles or consumers in the context of providing the Kia Connect Services,” says Kia spokesperson James Bell. He adds that the brand includes the category in its privacy policy to define “sensitive personal information” under the California Consumer Privacy Act. Nissan spokesperson Brian Brockman similarly says, “Nissan does not knowingly collect or disclose consumer information on sexual activity or sexual orientation,” and adds that state laws such as California’s require the company to disclose inadvertent information that might be inferred from other data such as location tracking.

It sounds like they list everything, because anything might be inferable somehow.
Your second context is a bad idea. If you truly want to avoid monopolistic behavior, then you want to encourage your employees to talk about that behavior plainly; so that when they do attempt something monopolistic, you will know about it and react.
> Engineered microbes are almost always far less fit than wild-type. They will survive best in a monoculture

True

But the article did not address this, it should have.

It will be the big question before deployment
What type of minor damage would require replacing the castings?
The issue is that the cheap water to grow feed is a social subsidy to the grower. If we are going to do it, the benefit should be local.
The following paragraph clarifies:
" “Kia does not and has never collected ‘sex life or sexual orientation’ information from vehicles or consumers in the context of providing the Kia Connect Services,” says Kia spokesperson James Bell. He adds that the brand includes the category in its privacy policy to define “sensitive personal information” under the California Consumer Privacy Act. "

It's not as bad as it sounds. It seems just like legalese making things sound more dire than they are.
I think the author took the wrong conclusions away from his experience. All the questions, all the personalization, all the stuff that apps tried to add to make things better actually made things worse. All they could measure was similarity. They encouraged him to double down on choosing people based on their tastes in entertainment and how they answered cheesy questions, ignoring three factors that perhaps should have been obvious from the beginning:

1. People are already effectively segregated by similarity in their real and online lives, and a dating app does them a disservice by doubling down on this.

2. Difference is an essential part of relationships. How many successful relationships do you know of where one person is spontaneous but liable to do foolish things, and the other person is steady and reliable but maybe a bit boring if left to themselves? Or where one person is an introvert but loves to cook for people and the other person is an extrovert who loves to throw parties?

3. People who try to get to know each other online are often surprised (and disappointed) when they meet in person. Online, you can only get very, very rough indicators of in-person romantic capability, no matter how much time and detail you have to work with. A month of getting to "know" someone online is worth less than five minutes of in-person conversation.

If you agree with these things, why in the world would you use any dating app whose basic premise runs contrary to them?

Tinder was accidental genius. A simplistic swipe left / swipe right app does exactly what you want. You show up knowing you don't know anything about the person, but vaguely excited. It's like glimpsing somebody from across the room and walking over to talk to them, except it's not just for people who enjoy spending time in crowded rooms striking up conversations with strangers who might not be interested in them.

People bag on Tinder because it's superficial. Tinder is genius because it's superficial. It sticks to the only thing that any dating app has ever been good at, and it leaves everything else in human hands. That's why dating apps are converging on the Tinder model. When apps stop doing what apps are terrible at, and stick to what apps can actually help with, there's very little left, but it's extremely useful.
They work well for bullion too.
None of this has anything to do with EVs in particular. All of this stuff is on ICE cars too.
PHP, Go, and TypeScript. I like them all.
At this stage Unity could offer a free unicorn and it wouldn't move the needle.

They literally smoked all their goodwill in a day with their retrospective revise the terms to something that fucks over ever dev thing
And who rouses the rousers?
I originally maintained a database of all the sushi I ate, but lost it due to a Heroku migration that I neglected to heed.
Unity makes its money from mobile gaming, and that is a juicy rock to squeeze.
In case you want to download the complete thing:

wget -r -np -nH --cut-dirs=3 -R '.html,.tmp' https://people.inf.ethz.ch/wirth/ProjectOberon/index.html
They bought the wrong VÅNGØGH and wanted to return it
Its funny you mention that. The enormous variety of games is what kept me on WC3 Battle.net for hours and hours at a time.
Like "you don't know as much as I do, I Googled a page and it says..." type. No they definitely know very little about the stuffs. And I personally heard and saw they tried to persuade OTHER patients, of different symptoms to listen to their "theories".
Indeed. I've worked for several and my recollection is that cautions around both what you do and how you talk about things that may be sensitive to regulators (like antitrust, export controls, etc.,) were present in the annual mandatory business conduct training at all of them.

(edit: fix grammar nit)