skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Quite definitely a personal story. I'm trying to illustrate the diverse lifestyles out there in margin of USAistan that aren't going to convert cleanly.

> majority of drivers

I definitely moved to a small town with boundless access to outdoor recreation because the standard-issue American lifestyle doesn't appeal. I caution you against endorsing technologies and social structuring programs that further the monocropping of humans (but I freely admit that this is a stony crypto/anarcho/discordian philosophical bent).
> unless you are directly mmapping and munmapping (or DONTNEEDing or similar) each allocation

You don't free up the memory you're not using? Sounds like you're doing it wrong then.

> I bet a really good AVX-512 transcoder with output size checking could be almost as fast as the OP.

Submit your pull request and we can evaluate your bet.
A marketplace is an e-commerce store.

A marketplace aggregates the best possible products of an industry into one place.
To do so, they have to find and attract the best vendors (individuals and/or businesses) to bring rarer products on their platform.

Another type of e-commerce store is drop-shipping, which instead bring value by finding a new market (or a new branding) to a product.

Traditionally, an e-commerce store is an online store of a brand managed by the maker(s) of that product.

Marketplace are now trendy because it's an efficient solution for customers that are looking to shop local and second-hand products.
Mine are from sources like the FDA, WHO, and CDC.
Silently doesn't have to literally mean without sound. When referring to written mediums it just means without notice. It implies that they hoped for it to go unnoticed because that's exactly it, if they weren't concerned about being secretive they'd take the time to announce it somewhere.
Really?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluesky_Social
For me, your site says "renewablesby", instead of "renewables by" https://ibb.co/vqxfvB9
Great Question! They link to their exactly 1 Gambling Sponsor Gamblify because they are a sponsor who've chosen to utilize the benefit of their sponsorship to link to their website.

The reason why other OSS projects you've looked at don't link to Gamblify is because they don't sponsor them, thanks for your question.

I have a question, what motivated you into asking a misleading question?
Your comparison of the various ListBox implementations[0] feels disingenuous. I know Vue best, so I looked at that implementation in detail, and it's got a lot going on that you don't attempt to replicate in your version. A few key features that are missing:

* Search—in the Headless UI version there are several hundred lines dedicated to making typing work for jumping to specific list items.

* Multiselect—Headless UI supports multiple selections, yours does not appear to. Again, this accounts for a large number of extra lines in the Vue implementation.

* Focus management—Headless UI has a lot of code dedicated to smoothing out the focus management. In my testing, your implementation has pretty buggy support for using tab to navigate.

* The Headless UI version dedicates a lot of lines to types, where your Nue implementation is dynamically typed. This may be a feature for you, but in my mind those type declarations are doing important work.

* In general, the Headless UI implementation tries to be flexible for many use cases [1], while yours only needs to support the one demo list.

These kinds of comparisons are most persuasive if you can write all the implementations from the ground up, using idiomatic patterns for each framework and identical feature sets for each implementation. When you do that, it's easy to compare and contrast the frameworks. As it is, it's like comparing a house to a garden shed: yes, you've used fewer lines of code, but it's not obvious to me that that's a feature of Nue and not just a byproduct of a less ambitious component.

[0] https://nuejs.org/compare/component.html

[1] https://headlessui.com/vue/listbox#component-api
Well it was a Lightning talk which, at least at those pycons I have attended, can be about anything the speaker wishes to talk about. Perhaps dotCloud had significant mind share amongst Python users ? I don't have any recollection of that but it's possibly another reason.
Anyone's Personal Resume Pipeline
Anyone's personal resume pipeline; edit one markdown file and produce a release with a PDF and docx and publish the resulting HTML as a GitHub Page - powered by GitHub Actions.
Yes, he is the brain behind the 2013 SimCity disaster.
With Mexico's permission of course, right? Anything else would be an invasion? PMC's maybe? Our forces are already spread thin in several key positions around the world and some of the current escalations are about to pop off.

A war with a neighbor would be expensive and significantly more lethal to US citizens than fentanyl. How about instead start with threatening sanctions and tariffs if they don't get their cartels on a leash?
It's different: at Newark Airport there was a whole shift of TSA officers whose main target was Indians leaving the US - elderly people with language difficulties, just despicable. One wonders about the logistics, anyone who is familiar with Terminal B in Newark knows there are cameras everywhere. It must have been lucrative, and the airport police must have been in on the joke.
> But shouldn’t we just indulge the harmless whims of an oppressed minority? Maybe, were it not for a strain of aggressive bossiness which insists, not so very harmlessly and not sounding very oppressed, that the rest of us must humour those whims and join in.

Goodness, what a whine. If you’re not a person who is directly confronted with this, why are you throwing yourself into this debate? The only reason to enforce your idea of a person’s gender over their own view of it is because you’re a jerk. It’s that simple. Stop being a jerk.
In a decent programming language you can nest functions, so all the little functions that make up some larger unit of the program are contained within (and can only be called within) that outer function. They serve less as functions to be called and more just as names attached to bits of code. And since they can't be called anywhere else, other people don't need to worry about them unless they're working on that specific part of the program.
Bro doesn't understand how the game works. Taylor is in on it 100%. It's not labels vs artists, it's labels + top artists vs. everyone else.
> Only break it down into sub-functions when re-use requires it. Don't do it solely for the sake of organization

What about for testing? What about for reducing state you need to keep in mind? What about releasing resources? What about understanding the impact of a change? Etc.

Consider an end of day process with 10 non-reusable steps that must run in order and each step is 100 lines. Each step uses similar data to the step before it so variables are similar but not the same. You would really choose a 1000 line single function?
> I just don't get this article.

If I understand the article, people who don't "get this article" are the very sort he is describing.

> Not criticize or complain about his dumb tweets?

What in particular did he say that you find "dumb"?
What do you mean never write any tests? The api should be the same. Order goes in, pizza comes out. The rest is implementation details that should not be exposed to a test.
A climbing or sports gym is different than a typical weightlifting gym. I mostly see people doing their sets alone, or running on treadmills and such
Ah, the "Social" was the part I was missing. Just searching for "Bluesky" takes you to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Sky
I realize too, its kind of hard to think about the next step after this line of analysis terminates. Like, ok, China was running sketch experiments and was not scrupulous enough in their oversight and safety practices, blah blah blah(!), what now? Are you gonna charge them the tabulated bill all over the world? It would destroy them or more accurately, give them a situation where they become Germany after WWI and have nothing to lose.

There needs to be an effort where they are held accountable and the zen koan paper tiger bullshit threats can be summarily sliced through but that still allows them to somehow save face on the world stage and domestically. I know it can't be easy to run that tight a ship without making powerful enemies no matter which step or direction you take.
I uninstall/delete and then at some point in the future redownload/reinstall games all of the time on both iOS and Steam. In fact Apple does the delete for me with some games automatically. Why should the developer of the game be charged a fee each time I do this?
The "accept our shaky premise or else" crowd is annoying. The intimidation has backfired. The first big public controversy for transgender bathroom rights was in 2016. right before the US presidential election,[1] and may have pushed Trump over the top and into the White House.

[1] https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/05/timeline-bath...
Is this really the best way for you to represent your company?
Clever idea. The ancient discipline of geometry is still useful.
> I’m now quite skeptical of quantification of romance and the idea that similarity makes for good relationships.

That was part of what made OkCupid amazing: It wasn’t even always similarity. You could answer a Question with A, want your match to answer with B or C, and assign how important that answer is.

This level of "complexity" seems unthinkable in modern apps.

I, too, met my wife on OkCupid around 2014, we both had over 1000 questions answered. Luckily, you could also get matches outside your area, she was on another continent ;)

Another thing I realized is that as an average looking, slightly overweight guy, you could easily get replies from "rarely replies" women by actually reading their profile and writing more than one sentence without being an asshole.
If you had read my comment and wanted to engage, the answer was right there:

> physical addiction.. withdrawal
I just started working on https://devblogs.net two weeks ago! Wanted to build something on Cloudflare Workers and D1 SQLite database. Compared to these blog collections, DevBlogs aggregates the posts in a feed.
Information has gotten harder and harder to come by as the Internet has matured. Think how much Tinder, Twitter, and Hinge know about human flirting and attraction. I believe it's just too black pilled to see the light of day.
I don't have the new design yet in any of my servers, but this sounds nearly identical to the iPad layout, which I've grown accustom to and don't mind.
“in order to settle any lingering unease about using such tools in physics” spoken like a true mathematician :D

I enjoyed the post a lot (at least the parts that didn’t pass right over my head). But I never met a physicist with lingering unease about dimensional analysis. We get that beaten into us until it’s as natural as breathing.
Congrats on the launch! Looks really interesting. I'm looking through the documentation and am having trouble understanding the slots example:

https://nuejs.org/docs/nuejs/component-basics.html#slots

I'm unable to see the relationship between the <slot /> tag and the looped content in the 2nd code snippet. Can you clarify that in the documentation?

Edit: I think it would have made more sense if you included the @name="media-object" attribute in the first snippet.
Related email by John Carmack: http://number-none.com/blow/blog/programming/2014/09/26/carm...

Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12120752
A great way to increase your boomerangs is to lay off more people and send out more job offers a few months later.
Are the people having direct conversations with the lawyer, where they ask for legal advice on an issue?

Then it’s covered.

If they aren’t, it’s not.

10 execs? Maybe. If they’re all involved in the same thing and all asking for advice. Seems unlikely to actually be the case though. So probably not.

100 folks listening to a presentation? Definitely not covered.
> Also, I find your decision to call the plant marijuana interesting. The names weed and pot have a negative connotation. But "marijuana" sounds a lot more acceptable. Nothing to do with you. Just something I noticed.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jan/29/marijuana-na...
But don't expect them to check whether the Chromebooks are still useful after an update. E.g., the original Lenovo duet turned into an oversized paperweight after one of their later updates.
> For kernel safety applications must be denied direct access to the host kernel, this is usually achieved with virtual machines.

And that is what QubesOS does, if I understand correctly?
I hear you! I went all-in to jQuery- scene. Even wrote a semi-famous library called "jQuery Tools" (oldies know). Then came React and I wrote Riot to simplify the syntax. Then I sidetracked to a startup world for (too) many years and watched aside how the frontend ecosystem grew to it's current dimensions.

Node uses a single dependency, htmlparser2 [1], in the package.json [2]. The HTML parser is used to traverse the HTML that is written on the Nue files. I quickly _thought_ of writing my own parser, but right now I'm having my eyes staring at Bun's native HTML parsing capabilities. Instead of Node, I'm using Bun to develop everything. I need less dependencies with it, because things like JS minification or .env file parsing are biult in.

Avoiding NPM dependencies is a high priority!

[1]: https://github.com/fb55/htmlparser2

[2]: https://github.com/nuejs/nuejs/blob/master/package.json#L12

[3]: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/discussions/1522
Hard to say exactly since I don't have experience with cl-ppcre, but this line seems to suggest something is actually happening at complile time:

> This happens if the compiler can determine that the regular expression (no matter if it's a string or an S-expression) is constant at compile time

If this were just a run of the mill caching mechanism, then whether the pattern was a constant at compile time wouldn't matter.
Creating AI agency for rights to Celebrities and Artists
I am working on a start-up that creates the AI for a roster of artists and celebs, such that they won't have spend years litigating the use of their style/voice/face/etc and I need to find someone who wants to protect artists and had a vast knowledge of AI and could create the program we use to create the assets. Feedback welcome.
Why couldn't Japanese publishers buy Godot (assuming that they even could)?
This was the most poorly written and blatantly biased article I’ve seen in a while.
The opposite of labile is stabile.

Probably a more common context for these words to occur is medicine, or more broadly toxicology, where you might have heard:

Heat labile vs heat stabile
You just nailed the paradox at the heart of much cannabis legalization discourse. I don't think the general public understands the "not mutually exclusive" point.
Human trials of artificial wombs could start soon
There are a few issues with what you're saying.

1. Weed has a mostly benign image right now. It has good PR.

2. It's much harder to realize that you're addicted to weed - unlike alcohol. Alcohol addiction is obvious to people around you as well. Not weed. Many weed addicts do not have the self awareness.

3. Weed can be significantly cheaper than alcohol per session - thus consuming more is economical for many. A few drinks at a bar could cost you $100 vs eat a weed gummy for $2 and then go out.

4. Weed addiction takes place over a long period of time. It could take years before you realize the negative effects. It's obvious for alcohol immediately.
Although not the same as what you desire (which I fully agree with) - I implemented a encrypted TCP program tunneling app which tunnels over HTTP(S) websockets [1]. This should frustrate middleboxes, but would rather it be as native as HTTP(S) itself.

[1]: https://github.com/nnathan/monopiped
What GUI are you using and how do I make my commits cleaner?
Most tweets are dumb. They are a tweet. That website is a mess.

I understand his article. He is bothered that he gets pushback and labeled all sorts of things because of what he writes. It happens. It's life. It's also not new. It's why so many religious/political people chose to create their own publications throughout history to not have to deal with editors/market forces.

Is he incapable of stepping back and understanding that the world is changing? Or looking at the bigger picture? Or thinking critically about the ways this moment mirrors other moments in history?
> The example code is vey simplistic, so of course that linear code is more readable, but the idea doesn’t scale.

One of the best reviewed functions I wrote at work is a 2000 line monster with 9 separate variable scopes (stages) written in a linear style. It had one purpose and one purpose only. It was supposed to convert from some individual html pages used in one corner of our app on one platform into a carousell that faked the native feel of another platform. We only needed that in one place and the whole process was incredibly specific to that platform and that corner of the app.

You could argue that every one of those 9 scopes could be a separate function, but then devs would be tempted to reuse them. Yet, each step had subtle assumptions about what happened before. The moment we would have spent effort to make them distinct functions we would have had to recheck our assumptions, generalize, verify that methods work on their own... For code that's barely ever needed elsewhere. We even had some code that was similar to some of the middle parta of the process... But just slightly didn't fit here. Changing that code caused other aspects of our software to fail.

The method was not any less debuggable, it still had end to end tests, none of the intermediate steps leaked state outside of the function. In fact 2 other devs contributed fixes over time. It worked really well. Not to mention that it was fast to write.

Linear code scales well and solves problems. You don't always want that but it sure as hell makes life easier in more contexts than you'd expect.

Note. Initial reactions to the 2000 line monster were not positive. But, spend 5 minutes with the function, and yeah... You couldn't really find practical flaws, just fears that didn't really manifest once you had a couple tests for it.
That could actually get farmers to increase alfalfa production.

Alfalfa water usage per acre is not much different than that of spinach, tomato, lettuce, wheat, or corn. As an aggregate it uses more water because (1) there is a lot of acreage of alfalfa, and (2) it can be grown nearly year around.

Furthermore, its water efficiency (how much is produced per unit of water used) is high.

If water costs go up some farmers might be able to make more money then by switching to alfalfa since it is more efficient.
>There are usually well-meaning reasons behind these processes, regardless how well they turn out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
Remember, 50k mmr is what some Googler make slinging code.
I know. I'm not really looking to compare it with C++'s standard library regex engine. (Although if someone wanted to do that work, I would welcome it into the benchmark.)

There are other engines written in C++ (in part or in whole) in rebar. And it is useful to compare it with engines not written in C++ too.
For trees try to photograph the flowers, the seeds, the bark, the leaves (both sides), the trunk growth habit (especially bottom portion), and the upper branches growth habit. Often when asking it to suggest a species switching between these will create progress.
Emotionally charged topics shouldn’t be avoided, but we should all strive to have rational and compassionate conversations about such things.

I always like to introduce people to this rules of civil conversation during such exchanges.

https://therulesofcivilconversation.org/

Equally helpful to maintain conversations that are positive is to check out own biases and fallacies:

https://yourbias.is/

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/
And for some of us it just causes horrible anxiety.
Thanks. I appreciate your perspective. I think it's accurate. I also think that there's been huge cross-pollination among cultures for all types of things: food, dress, language, music. To the point where the idea of "ownership" and therefore (that probably false notion of) "theft/appropriation" is ridiculous. It's like the Zen buddhist perspective on existence: everything is inherently empty of form because it's just a set of conditions arising from pre-existing causes, that themselves are...in an endless chain. So the idea of claiming any 1 particular little snapshot in the infinite graph as an island and saying "This is mine. We did this on our own!" is as ridiculous as Jeff Bezos saying he is a self-made man (of course his success is his own, but his achievements stood on the shoulders of the efforts of millions throughout time). In another sense I think there's definitely "disrespectful referencing" where people use a cherished part of another culture in a mocking way, but the weird thing is there's a lot less of that than the "appropriation-philes" would like you to believe. (or whatever you call those culture warriors from the ministry of love). I think the only disrespectful thing lying to try to misrepresent someone's enthusiastic/joyful/respectful/sincere reference/usage of some culture as something bad. The same way a bully fabricates a wrong as a pretext to start a fight, or an abuser tries to gaslight you into believing you "deserve" it because reasons: these people throwing around the term appropriation are just abusive bullies who are too cowardly to own their hostility honestly, and want to hide it as "justified" behind reasons, that end up being an abuse of the very cultures they merely pretend to protect. They are in effect, abusing the culture they say they are protecting, as a pretext to pick a fight to hurt and abuse others. It's crazy. But that's how that thing operates.

Also, I checked your posts...did you figure out that Uber thing? I thought one counter could be, leave the door open / block it from closing until the driver accepts the ride. If they refuse to accept, then get out (the door is still open) and cancel it. Just trying to be helpful, I don't think it's a checkmate strategy but could give you something.

I once lost a phone in an Uber, and Uber didn't didn't do anything. I didn't expect them to (strangely, right? My expectation was my phone would simply be swallowed into the void of accidental oops we don't know nothing), when in reality, connecting me to driver and having it passed back would be the easiest thing in the world as everything is tracked.

I think we shouldn't accept the great convenience as a tradeoff to losing other expectations (like safety, security of valuables, etc). But sometimes I think we're expected to do just that. "The price we pay" some kind of subliminal subtext to the whole enterprise. But I don't think it should be that way.
As someone who's been following development and the situation in general, I just thought I'd pop in to say "I second this" - which normally wouldn't be a very useful reply, but I think people are (rightfully) skeptical of first-party claims when it comes to the significance of security issues.
It is also super powerful technique when using the closure of a function as a way to encapsulate logic and state. A good example is this implementation of a json parser in js[1]. Attempt at lifting the lexer functions or state out of the function would result in every function needing to be wrapped with a factory function. Parser have always been tricky and before I knew this technique I would have reached for a parser combinator/generator but this is a very sensible way of doing it.

[1] https://lihautan.com/json-parser-with-javascript/
Oracle Cloud database hardware to reside in Azure datacenters