skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So what price do you sell it for and who do you choose to sell to at your below market price?
I mean classical autocomplete, the ones we have on our phones that give us one word as a time (on iOs you get 3 options to choose from)
Godot is never going to be able to ship for consoles due to license incompatibility. That's a pretty big dealbreaker for non-hobbyist projects that aren't exclusively targeting desktop.
Remind me, was it in 1e->2e or 2e->3e that they fixed the whole "Street sams get to empty their magazines before mages even get to act" in the initiative system? SR 3e is one of my top systems, fwiw but I only played like 2 sessions in 2e.

My group is currently playing Fantasy Craft, which has a bit too much crunch for us. For the past 2 months I've had an idea for overhauling the battle system mulling around in my head.
Pathfinder 1e is amazing if you really like planning, spreadsheets, and tactics. It's seriously phenomenal.

5e is the best introductory system and the best system for a night of drinking though. Less thought, more play.

BG3 is even more introductory. It's an opening to d&d for new players and a soft, super fun system for old players. Source: I'm loving bg3.
ChatGPT should do your earnings calls
https://archive.ph/4JzDD
My first impression was that it could have also been spanish "Copia" (copy), but built for KDE (thus following the naming trend of those apps)
This is also common in the US.

Example below. Top row is blurry but bottom row shows “per ounce” price on the bottom right. Tiny print and I imagine barely anyone actually shops that way.

I’m guessing there must be some US requirement for this otherwise I’m not sure why it’s commonplace.

https://supersafeway.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Screen-S...
It's almost as if the way you say things matter a lot.
I love dogs. There is no way I'd want a Pitbull or close relative. As a kid my dad took in a Bull Terrier, a relatively small but absolutely ferocious dog. We were pretty good buddies and I owe at least one count of 'not being beaten up' to that dog (I was mobbed in an Amsterdam park while walking the dog). Even so I would never want one or an even larger breed from the same family. I've seen what she could do and how quickly she could go from the world's nicest pet to absolute killer mode. Animals like that should not be held in society. I've also had an Irish Wolfhound and even though it too was fiercely protective of us and children I would have absolutely no problem trusting her.

Dog breeds have built-in character. Hunting dogs are on a different plane than fighting dogs and just like you don't bring a drugged up cage fighter into your home you shouldn't bring a fighting dog into your home. They simply do not belong there. The people that have these dogs usually just have them to show off, they don't understand the first thing about dog training/rearing and will happily put the dog in extremely dangerous situations without thinking twice about it. Many such owners end up being mangled by their own dogs.

There are other dogs that are on my 'would not have' list, either because I don't see the dog as suitable for living in a home with people or because the dog has a disposition that makes it a ticking time bomb. Where to draw the line is tricky, any dog if sufficiently pissed off is going to attack. But small dogs will likely not do a while lot of damage (unless you are a small child) and most dogs tend to require a lot of pushing before they get angry and as a rule they'll give plenty of warning.
Yeah, this complaint is nonsense. It mechanically nullifies the damage and we colloquially call it a 'miss' because it applies whether someone has armor or not, but how to interpret that depends on the situation.

For example, an Arcane Trickster throwing up a reaction 'shield' spell doesn't cause the hit to miss either, it just was blocked(as it added 5 to AC).
The applications they target are very similar.
This is endlessly debated within the community (e.g., https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/blog-post-no-namespaces-in...), and there's no consensus on whether namespaces would be an improvement
How is this tracked though?? It could work like this..

+ When you build, Unity secretly adds your Unity account id to the build.

+ When the game is run for the 1st time it secretly calls home to Unity server with your account id

+ The server increments # of installs from your account by one..

But couldnt this be overcome by just creating a new Unity account for every build?

I really want to know btw. I am a unity dev and have just tendered for a contract assuming we'll build it in Unity. Switching to Godot will take us time and reduce quality as we are not experienced in it.
It killed the cat.
Realistically - how locked in are developers to their current engine?

I imagine >50% of video game development is art. And I imagine some decent percentage of code can be translated without nearly as much effort as the original implementation.

Still, I doubt many developers are going to switch engines mid or late development.

But a lot of times, developers re-use much from their old games in development of their new games.

Is this realistically going to hold developers back from moving future development to a new engine?
I had to google pronounciation of czkawka and to me it sounds exactly how i would pronounce it - chkavka or чкавка in Russian

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/czkawka
He doesn't really dig into what he means by apolitical, and what bitcoiners mean by apolitical.

One of the big risks with fiat currency is that your government might do "something stupid" or "something corrupt" with monetary policy and cause the fiat currency to crash in value.

The most popular cryptocurrency (Bitcoin) has a monetary policy that's set in stone. You're protected from an incompetent / corrupt government who either accidentally or deliberately break the money supply.

That's what bitcoiners mean by apolitical.

The article then goes on to point out how the monetary policy of bitcoin is not very good monetary policy. He's right when he says this, but you can only have good monetary policy if you've got a competent government. A lot of people don't have a competent government.
The standard definition of wetting doesn't mention water. (For one thing, other liquids can make stuff wet.)

The first few paragraphs on wikipedia are a pretty good summary, and the article also includes a picture of a water bead failing to wet a surface:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetting
Good thing he never said those words, then!
You see, this is how you make a good article title about Google product. It contains the word "release" which makes it immediately obvious it is a new product, not cancellation of existing product. Many times people post articles about Google products without single verb in title and everybody then has to read TFA to figure out if it was released or cancelled. As a rule, articles about Google products should always contain verb.
The problem is that there is not enough housing for the people who want to live there. Building more is the only way to address that problem other than exclusing people who want to live there.
More features. Gogs is just git hosting.
Apologies, but such mindset is the essence of the worst programming traits.

> The code that is more easily unit testable, is the code I care about.

Author argues that his code is more readable. Sounds like you're saying that being unit-testable is more important than being readable.

> Neither example is easily tested.

Only if you're a unit testing zealot. Integration/E2E testing is easy for both.

> Neither support injecting the dependencies, which make mocking really difficult.

Mocking is not a virtue. Also, if mocking is the sole reason you're using DI, you're doing it wrong.
Median is 50percentile. 50% of employees are making less than 80k.

You'd need a scatter plot of pay vs experience in this cohort to really say that the demands are unreasonable.

We dont know how much buearocracy/middle mgmt there is in these companies, and how much they make, and how much value they contribute, vs extract.

I dont see how any lay person can pass judgement about whether the strike is fair or not without access to a lot more facts than just ceo pay or median pay.

Not saying that the strike is justified, just that the over confident tone that its not is unwarranted.
Bitcoin literally uses voting to on which branch to use as it's consensus tie break mechanism. It depends on the value of the network incentivizing people to vote in a way that keeps the network trustworthy. I don't know if you can get more overtly political than that.
As a European, I'm more and more amazed by the American mind set when it comes to tackling any kind of problem; more weapons.

If Europe had a person representing the US mind set, it would be Jeremy Clarkson. "MORE POWER! GIVE ME A HAMMER!"
Besides defaults how would you get precision in a model without any other data? Payment history and total outstanding credit wouldn’t be there. You would have to trust the customer to provide you with all these details.

Without precision in the risk model, cost to the consumer will go up to mitigate risk. Someone who has paid all their credit lines for 10 years but and has never defaulted has the same risk profile as a person who has frequently missed payments.
That is terrible. I have a number of issue reports open with immich but didn't know about this particular snag. Has this been reported to their GitHub?
Yeah but not whole libraries. At least not here in Europe. Not sure about US. But here sharing a movie is only allowed if you watch it together at home.
Ah, ok, so Bard will still be around but with a different (hopefully much better) model underlying. So far Bard has been very lackluster.
Have you seen an engine compartment of the Tesla? It's empty! So much empty space. Am I paying for this space? Oh no!
Csv is surprisingly common and I prefer it despite parsing, quoting, encoding and escaping woes.

Amazon S3 let's you query csv files already loaded in buckets which is interesting but I haven't used yet.

One company I worked at a long time ago used free dropbox accounts as a ftp like drop that they would consume. Was hilarious and it worked well and was easy to stay under the free limits.
IMO the biggest hit to realism in (A)D&D has was dropping morale (I think in 3e? I didn't play much 2e). Part of why undead were so scary was that they never ran or surrendered (hence the whole "Turning Undead" mechanic; you didn't need to turn living creatures; they'd often flee or surrender).
But would people enjoy another system more? Do people only enjoy DnD because it's the first reasonable system in the genre they tried and don't know how much better it gets?
Yes, it's just not what we mean when we say Bitcoin is apolitical. What we mean is that it's not subject to political influence nor does it require government to operate. In contrast to fiat money.
The nice thing about active learning with a classic ML model is, everytime you annotate a data point, the model learns.

How do you update your prompt to take the new data point into account? Or do you just add it as an example inside the prompt and let it grow?
Enjoy your toxoplasmosis, and subsequent schizophrenic symptoms… but at least your cats got to hunt all the diseased rats they like, right?
You're right about artists going independent to capture more value for themselves, but you're wrong about the Spotify payouts being enough for a middle-class living wage. It's nowhere close to being enough to support an artist. Streaming music is basically a loss-leader for artists these days.

1,000 streams on Spotify nets the artist $2.38 in payouts [0]. For an artist to earn $60,000/year that means that they would have to accumulate roughly 25,000,000 streams on Spotify.

And that's assuming that you're a single person with 100% of the publishing and mechanical rights to your record. If you're a band, divide that by the number of band members or songwriters. Less the productions costs, less promotional costs, less expenses for equipment, less your manager's cut, less your label's cut. It goes on and on.

[0]: https://soundcamps.com/spotify-royalties-calculator/
Godot games have been shipped on consoles plenty of times
For what piece to replace the unmoved king with, you can actually use both white AND black pieces, since the starting rank can decode what color the king is:

- White Knight on E1 and no king: Replace with white king that can castle both ways, E4 pawn can be taken En Passant

- White Bishop on E1 and no king: Replace with white king that can castle kingside, E4 pawn can be taken En Passant

- White Rook on E1 and no king: Replace with white king that can castle queenside, E4 pawn can be taken En Passant

- Black Knight on E1 and no king: Replace with white king that can castle both ways, E4 pawn cannot be taken En Passant

- Black Bishop on E1 and no king: Replace with white king that can castle kingside, E4 pawn cannot be taken En Passant

- Black Rook on E1 and no king: Replace with white king that can castle queenside, E4 pawn cannot be taken En Passant

It's the same for E8, just put a black king and not a white king. Sorry if this is repetitive, I could have probably just explained it and let you figure it out, but I put the cases down here for clarity. This should also be combined with the Knight huffman encoding that was talked about here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37527350
>My current theory is to focus more on revenue sharing instead of stock price. For example, dividend stocks. I don't think it completely solves the problem, but it at least moves things in the right direction.

This can't be directly enforced. You can't make laws for what people to "focus" on.

Though there is a way to indirectly push this notion: Restrict all stock ownership to be a minimum of 10 years. This indirectly puts more focus on dividends.

It also puts more focus on the core misalignment you're alluding at but failed to see explicitly: The misalignment between short term gains and long term gains.

In the end whether private or public they care about profit over customer. But private owners tend to care about customers because customers represent an overall bigger gain in the longer term and private owners are playing the long game.

If all stocks had a minimum 10 year ownership requirement it will change all corporations to focus on long term gains. I believe this one change can fundamentally fix the problem we have with corporations.

Maybe we can test this.

The other thing that needs to be changed is public responsibility. If a company dumps illegal nuclear waste in some river, directly ask for minimum fines from all shared holders. First divide the fine by the shareholder amount, charge each shareholder. Then if it's below a 500 dollar minimum add the remaining amount to get it up to 500.

Pissed off share holders paying 500 will definitely get corporations to stop doing random crap. Maybe even funnel jail time to board members or C-level execs. If a corporation is responsible for deaths it's justice to place actual people responsible rather then giving "jail time" to a corporate entity that doesn't actually exist.
I mean, the only mode was survival… at least that’s what I recall playing the prerelease versions.
Debatable, but a good answer. "Umbrella" I think is considered the song that elevated her, but that was written by another group of artists that had originally considered it for Britney Spears. Interesting history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umbrella_(song)
cryptography is based on non repudiation, but cryptocurrency is just human-written codebases. You can very much fork/modify/influence/introduce bugs in/backdoor/etc. code. It fails to promote cryptography's qualities to a higher sphere, as the more cryptocurrencies become harmful to society, the more they become governed by contract law. This has been the trend for the last decade, at least.
How are you calculating .50 cents personal vs .10 cents pro?
Im curious if its able to use NAS Storage or a combination of offline/online storage

I got a Synology in my house that could be utilized
kill the sound, else ; +1
I'm all for donating to software that one finds useful. I do think it depends on how useful you find it and how complex it is to create and maintain.

I have some free apps that I don't earn anything on and don't expect donations. They're simple, more educational or casual use, and my updates are few and far between. Even I probably wouldn't donate to an app like these.
> memory allocation can occur here and there

What about HW decoders? Of video formats (that are much more complex than image decoders)? Such as MPEG, H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1 and similar. If memory allocation is needed here and there, I guess there is always known maximum size of such allocation in advance. Written in the spec. Think of at chip design time, or at software decoder compile time. How else would HW decoders be even possible?

Also: Hey Google, do you even fuzz-test? Your own stuff?
Government had to provide basic services during a time of emergency and there are regulations in place to stop people taking advantage of vulnerable people.

Sounds good, I'd pay tax money toward it.
I assume it's a vestige from the old days when you ordered actual tapes or printouts from government agencies. The notion of an order that had to be prepared is baked into how they think about the service and product.

All sorts of strange things happen with accessing US government data. But most agencies have a lot of excellent data available for free and motivated data scientists who want to make it available to you.
Oh, that's neat! I don't think it leaves me with a way to play my existing games though.
Isn't promissory estoppel typically used as a fallback theory when a legal contract does not exist?
"I am happy to assist any business, organization or person to use our data."

..any? It makes me nervous that you actually mean that.
I guess that is a risk I'm accepting. For what it's worth, for photos specifically, Apple keeps them in a deleted folder for up to 30 days. But I'm pretty careful with my digital content and I would much rather them be synced.
This much is clear to me:

- A globalized world needs a global money. In recent times, this has been $USD. $USD beats gold because it is more portable.

- Money is too large of a concern for any government to do well. There is too much at stake. Too much incentive to do be a poor steward. Too much buddying up to the money printer.

So what's left? Gold and Bitcoin. Gold for deep wealth and Bitcoin for global commerce.
There are limits to what sorts of changes are enforceable, though most of those documents also say the vendor gets to choose the arbitration firm that decides what is enforceable.
How Much Privacy Do You Have in Modern Vehicles?
His points aren't just about historical accuracy, they are also on value and language (being an unmitigated pedant, he would for example also probably object to something being called a "hot water heater").

I believe his points on historical accuracy are actually more about physics consistency although he does explain some of the confusion away with the mistaken Victorian historical assumptions.
Whatever floats your boat. I am not here to get into Stallman level discussions about what is open and what is not. Point is we get to work with the sources if we want/have to, tied to a license with all its privileges ... and of course restrictions. Just like with any other open software sources.
Is voting inherently political? Are leader election algorithms political?
AC simplifies "harder to hit at all" and "harder to actually damage" into a single stat, which is frankly a positive. It's about simplifying combat enough that you can keep things moving. I've played enough TTRPGs to appreciate simplicity in combat: some developers truly believe that people want to sit around watching other people roll dice and do math for ages. If, for some reason, you only care about hitting a target, and not penetrating their armor or actually damaging them, the DM can always adjust the effective AC accordingly.

And I'd argue that the feats and spells are largely fine. Sure, there's not dramatic variation but that's because in a simple system there's only so much you can do, and DnD has a spell that mechanically covers every such niche. Combine that with the desire to have some mechanically similar but differing in roleplaying implications, and you've got DnD's spellbook.
There is likely telemetry - good point. I assume that such telemetry can be block if you are concerned.
I'm curious about the UWB integration, I thought apple's Find My could only track airtags? Is it simulating one? And the only UWB dev kits / readers I can find are thousands of dollars.
Linux doesnt run on consoles though and the comment was about linux, which godot supports quite well. Once it gains popularity it will also sort out console issues.
> I think scientism runs deeper than just a set of philosophical beliefs. It is more like a modern religion, or even an aesthetic.

I agree.

> A key feature of scientism is that science itself is never well defined or understood by its adherents, so science is a floating signifier that can mean whatever its proponents want it to mean. Typically, these are not people with firsthand experience doing science, but consumers of second and thirdhand science media and science culture...

I don't think that completely true. I think you have different levels of adherents of scientism, and what you say is definitely true of most of the lower levels ("consumers of second and thirdhand science media and science culture").

However the top tier consists of the creators of a decent chunk of that "science media and science culture." Many of those people are actual scientists, but ones who have sought out the public eye as "science popularizers" and are best known for their works for general audiences.
A contract like that covers a lot more than just the material itself: there's branding, use of the author's name and likeness, editorial rights of both parties, etc. There's no particular reason to assume it would be tied to the copyright status of the work itself, and plenty of reasons to assume it wouldn't (after all, you don't want to have to pull the author branding just because something entered the public domain over time).
ACOUP is very aware of the pedantry part. He is also an avid gamer himself (see his extensive articles about what the Paradox grand strategy games get right and wrong).
MakeMKV is a worthy investment. If I can't find it to stream (did you know yt-dlp works on tubi?) I find a copy of the dvd in a $1 bin and make my own digital edition. And it also works with new boutique 4k UHD blurays.

In Canada, it's hard to find ways to stream a lot of 70s, 80s, 90s studio 'classics' (my standards). Because of legacy licensing arrangements with the big 2 and their spinoffs, not even the studio services carry their own movies. So my options are buy it digitally for $20, rent it for 48 hours for $6, or hit the dollar bins at flea markets, garage sales, and the like.

I use the money I save to support film conservators like vinegar syndrome. They've brought me far more compelling releases over the last few years than anything these executives would dream of touching.

I've got a backlog longer than I am tall. And if I need to zone out on brain-dead mindless TV, I've got an unlimited amount of it on YT to keep me going.

Part of the fun is the hunt for something good to consume.

YouTube has made it clear we can pay direct to content creators and cut this executive out of the equation entirely. This is nothing more than the thrashings of a drowning rat.
> Every next generation mines 32x less bitcoin

Keys discovered versus keys remaining is a logarithmic curve.
The starlink orbits are self cleaning, they are so low that without intervention things just slow down and fall out.