skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my opinion it’s far worse than this: it’s not just a considerably less ambitious component, it’s a component currently completely unfit for any purpose. Most significantly, it’s inaccessible due to semantic abuse and missing ARIA support (role=listbox, aria-controls, aria-expanded, aria-selected, &c. &c.). Even as a sighted user that doesn’t need to use accessibility tech (AT; screen readers are the best known example), I would hate to encounter a page using this, because it misses valuable functionality like type-ahead. Users that depend on AT will be left high and dry, presented with just a read-only text box and no idea what to do with it.

All up, it’s just like so many others, a bad reimplementation of half of what the browser already provides with <select>. About the only thing it adds to that is support for an image per option, and perhaps some more exotic styling aspects (which you hopefully don’t want anyway).

Mind you, I do find Headless UI generally bloated, mostly just suffering from being overly flexible, and it does end up with a moderate amount of code bloat attributable to the particular frameworks’ designs (though not as much as some I’ve seen), but the comparison is just unreasonable. If they think it’s fair to say “With React: 2.5k lines; with Nue: 200 lines”, then I respond: “With HTML: 0 lines”, and insist that <select> is better than the result of those 200 lines.

There are more problems with it, too, whereas I suppose Headless UI will be a pretty high-quality implementation. Examples of problems I found immediately, without having tried to actually run it, but which I presume Headless UI will be free of: it uses <menu> for the options and wraps each option’s label with <strong>, which are both semantic sins; some of the code sharing with combo boxes leads to obvious minor inefficiency (filtering, which can’t actually happen); Escape detection happens on keyup instead of keydown; clicking outside the listbox popup won’t close it if the target or an ancestor matches .open, which is very plausible, e.g. when within a modal dialog (and because it’s ad hoc, it’s certain to interact badly with things like clicking outside modals—any concept of potentially-nestable modality needs to be managed more than that, in one of a few ways but I’ve already rambled enough); after pressing Escape to close the popup, pressing Tab will reopen it as well as moving to the next focusable.

Hopefully the problems with this will be sorted out, but at present I think it’d be best to just remove the comparison, because it portrays a false picture, and suggests that the listbox is ready for use, whereas I hope that the author would agree it’s not.
For 2D games, libGDX, used in many Android indie games.

If you are only interested into desktop, jmonkeyengine is also a possibility.

Most good engines, that also support mobile, game consoles and VR/AR headsets, are bound to use languages supported by the platform SDKs, so there will always be some C or C++.

Unity is a special kind, as they took the effort to create their own C# to native code compiler (even if via translation to C++).

Which is basically what everyone not using either C or C++ has to do, and then create wrappers to all the SDK APIs across all target platforms.
Oh yeah, the more he says it the more people will realise just how stacked the deck of cards is.

The shortsighted moron that he is doesn't understand he is a massive part of the problem that plagues much of the western world. Rent seeking, asset inflating, short sighted and arrogant to go with it.

What happens to his property empire if the peons who live in his shoddily built crap shacks can no longer pay the rent?
Sport gear companies? Just selling you a lifestyle and an identity. Meditation apps feel more like someone exploiting a fad than some with an actual interest in your wellbeing.
I hear you: infernal combustion engines produce a buttload of negative externalities. So does everything. If I could wave a magic wand and get all the normies into townhomes in walkable neighborhoods, I absolutely would (in no small part because it would get them and their nightmare mass-produced suburbs out of my daily experience).

What I'm failing to convey is an opinion that homogenizing humans and their experiences is a dangerously totalitarian approach to social design. One of my favorite things about the internal combustion engine is the freedom of choice it buys pretty much everyone: an auction car is cheap, and can get you out of trouble in a pinch.

To zoom out though, I suspect that we disagree fundamentally on the cornucopian/eschatonian axis tho. Even harder to reconcile than bluecult/redcult!
What’s the hold up on designer babies though? I grew up thinking this is the future, choosing and customizing the genetic makeup of your children but I had to create my own kids the old fashioned way, fearing at every checkup for whatever defects and abnormalities we may find.

Together with artificial wombs, this would liberate us from one of the heavies tyrannies nature (and evolution) have placed on us. But it could be worse, I guess. We could be like praying mantises…
I am the co-founder of Keyternal.

https://keytern.al (website painfully out of date)

I estimate the hundreds of thousands of cryptocurrency private keys we safeguard (in conjunction with the keys held in other organizations, via multisig) have at points in time protected somewhere on the order of single digit billions USD.

We're not a wallet provider, just a backup key storage service, so I couldn't get exact figures even if I wanted to: by design we don't have that information about our customers.

The PGP-encrypted keys are held completely offline (cold) in vaults, the set of Yubikeys (in other, different vaults) is used during signing ceremonies to temporarily decrypt them (only in ram, on offline computers without storage) to produce recovery signatures when our customers run out of other options. We're the last resort in a DR plan.

It requires careful coordination with another keyholder (a different organization) to produce valid transactions; neither ours nor theirs alone is sufficient. Transactions need two signatures: one from
each. In that sense, neither key is "worth" anything by itself, but together they protect large sums.
Not just the commenter, but his team as well. It passed code review with flying colors, apparently. The moral of the story is that there always exceptions and developers should not be ideologically committed to one approach above all else.
Do you have evidence to support your feelings about what mainstream Democrats feel? Or can you name right-of-West-but-still-extreme-left politician who exemplifies your position? Because I'm pretty far out there but I love the constitution -- and while I think it's got its flaws, I'm no different from Ben Franklin in that regard and I see it as a living document: it can and must be amended as those flaws become apparent.
Real talk from an autoworker in Mexico re the strike
It's Dickensian out there
Like the ghost of Tom Joad
Yeah I had this exact tinge of unease when the game started but I couldn’t really identify where it emerged from. I think you nailed it on the head.
Suing for first amendment rights, property rights, inability to tax without voter approval (in some states). Whereas HOAs are not covered by the bill or rights and can levy special fees by a simple board vote typically.
And my more sophisticated library, https://github.com/stevemk14ebr/PolyHook_2_0
Fully agree, it filled a Dr. Ian Cutress shaped hole in my life. I've learned so much over the last year. It has come to the point where I'm only mildly interested in benchmarks of a new product launch from Intel/AMD/Nvidia/Arm, what I really wait for is clamchowder's uArch deep dives.

Also a friendly reminder that you can support their journalism via Patreon.
It's not a failure if it meets its stated goals. It's not trying to be a programmer's font, a terminal font, etc. It's specifically only trying to be a font for cockpit displays. On that front, there isn't really a context where I and l would be ambiguous in context. The only place I can think of would be waypoint names, but those are always all caps, so I and L don't present any problem.

On the other hand, putting crossbars on their I would make it much more visually similar to their 1 glyph. Mixing I and 1 (again, in waypoint names, for example), is much more likely and the strong visual difference in I and 1 by not having crossbars on the I seems like a better choice for the stated goals/applications of this font. ("...improve the display of information on the cockpit screens, in particular in terms of legibility and comfort of reading, and to optimize the overall homogeneity of the cockpit")
The big 3 made over $21 billion in profits in the first half of this year. This isn't about fighting over scraps, it's about fighting for a fair share of the wealth produced by workers.
Bitcoin is commonly held to be worth something, i.e., an asset. But there are many who argue that its “true” value is 0. Something similar to that divergence is happening here. We, as a society, have a convention, a habit, where copyrighted works, trademarks, mining rights, etc. are restricted by law to be controlled by a single legal entity. This makes these a tradable commodity. But if the law did not apply to these, they would become worthless. It is, in fact, these laws which have created this tradable commodity from nothing. Other laws could be created to do the same to any number of currently freely available things; this does not prove that these things should be covered by such laws merely because it would create a kind of property which would have value.
Sure.. I believe in breaking cities up to be smaller and more manageable. For example, my neighborhood in my city of Portland ought to be its own city because we have little in common with the politics of the rest of the city. That is why there is a political process we can follow to do that. Its called incorporation and has happened many times before all over the country. Cities are not fixed in stone. We don't need a new organization to do what cities used to.

Moreover, your analogy falls apart because HOAs are not governments and the people aren't protected from them the way they are a government. As much as I disagree with the city of Portland politically, I can post whatever messages I want outside my non HOA home and the city can do jack shit about it, because, as an American government they are unable to patrol my speech.

If HOAs were governments then I would have a different opinion (I would be somewhat in favor). However they are not.

As a final point of difference. A foundational principle of conservative governance is that governments are formed for and BY the people. However, HOAs are formed by development companies typically. Corporations are not people (and are not legally treated as such, despite widespread belief). Corporations have no right to form a government that the future residents cannot modify. HOAs are much harder to get rid of than a city. Thus, we have an example of an alleged American government that was never formed by a group of residents and cannot be modified or eliminated by them. That's problematic and un American
Even before ChatGPT, Microsoft often used Bing Translate for languages other than English. There also seemed to be no one to check the translations, so nonsensical expressions like the ones in this case were commonplace. Now, with the advent of ChatGPT, its influence has spread to English content as well.
I've never understood why Plex phones home or why Plex the company has any insight at all into what's running on your Plex installation. I was never able to look past that, so I never installed it.

After years without a media server, I've started using Jellyfin and it's great. It's self-hosted but still has decent client apps. And there's no sketchy corporation watching my server, which just runs on my laptop and streams to my phone via my local network.
That makes it a lot more clear, thank you!
Or maybe it was just a long, sequential algorithm where breaking it up wouldn't have been an improvement.
Making NixOS modules for fun and (hopefully) profit
Mach engine is written in Zig
It’s not the “left” or “progressives” who have top leadership calling for the disregard of the constitution.

“Do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution" - Trump
If you truly want focused you don't even need a window manager, you aren't even forced to run x11 or wayland but if so just put your favorite text editor desktop file in /usr/share/xsessions is enough.
Thank you so much! Yup, things are moving quickly
What approach were they using before?
But then who's gonna make oversized pickups?
It's a lawyer pointing out that we're headed into uncharted territory. It's not an attempt to nullify anything.
Cool ideas, took a brief look but I’ll need to dig in when I’m at my computer.

On a sidenote, I was startled by the tailwind mention. Am I out of the loop? Is it not just some css classes? Why is it being compared to React? I’ve used tailwind casually a few times and dont remember it increasing my build size very much at all.
The big 3's profits were $250 Billion over the last 10 years. The idea that paying their workers fairly is going to cripple them is nonsense.
Nue CSS is like SASS, but more minimal and more in line with the current standards. Think CSS variables instead of template variables. It's pretty vocal about semantic CSS and separation of concerns once it's public. The main thing is to give a strong alternative to the current css-in-js movement. Haven't checked Uno CSS in detail, but looks like it's a close companion to Tailwind. Nue is a big step away from tight coupling.
>I am really heartbroken by your response, I always feel the world/society should fight planned obsolescence.

alternative explanation - they feel there is overuse of computing devices and that one could really go back to pencil and paper for lots of tasks.
I wrote an excessively detailed comment on the implications of an artificial wombs from a legal perspective in the US: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37308675#37314083

TLDR: it's not as simple as just "fetus", but there is much disagreement around when a developing clump of cells becomes protected under the law.
depravity or deprivation though? (last line of article)

depravity: moral corruption; wickedness
deprivation: an absence or too little of something important

Sleep depravity would be a sleep that is morally corrupt. How does that look like? ;-)
Plex is trying to reinvent itself, 10 years too late, as the next Roku. By changing the product's focus and drumming up anti-piracy PR like this, they're whitewashing the brand. That's why every major update of the software takes it farther from the thing you purchased (a nice frontend for your downloaded movie collection) and closer to something you don't want -- a bunch of recommendations for streaming services you've never heard of, while burying your media library ever deeper in the default UI.

It's yet another form of Cory Doctrow's enshittification.

Five years from now, Plex will have gone public or been acquired, probably by Facebook so that we can have Facebook TV for a couple years before that shuts down. The original Plex userbase will have long left for a better product.
Stopping calling people “wimpy, creepy nerds” would be a good start.
That’s $2k, per seat, per year.

Which you now need to pay to get rid of the Unity splash screen. Why they haven’t learned the lesson of only poor developers (and therefore, largely shovelware and bad games) showing their splash screen is a really bad idea I’ll never understand. I suppose this will technically help with that.
A lot of plants outdoors are grown in partial shade via shade netting. In my head, it makes a lot of sense to supply some of that shade with solar panels. Likewise, it's a win because we "dual" use the same land surface area. We also probably save on water by not leaving so much of it to evaporate from the direct sunlight.

Maybe someone smarter or more knowledgeable can help out, but this strikes me as a very elegant solution.
In this context, they're usually web design companies that specialise in Wordpress sites.
I wonder if they'd settle for a (retroactive relatively) reduction in CEO Pay, coupled by an increase of at least the CEO's pay increase or better relative to the last contract period.

## HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE ##

+ Prior to contract CEO made 10,000,000 per year. Since then they (currently) make 14,000,000 per year.

+ Union is asking for 40% increase to match CEO's increase.

? Would the union accept CEO's total compensation package, including retroactive to cover the same period, decrease to E.G. 20% (CEO now makes 12,000,000 per year in this hypothetical) with a union member INCREASE of 20% or greater (possibly including a one time contract signing bonus to cover the back period)?
I built a Twitch bot hooked up to one of the avatars, you can try it without signing up (as long as you already have a Twitch account): https://www.twitch.tv/heyastrocyte

The idea is basically an AI twitch streamer, you talk in chat and they respond. In this case it's AI Naruto!

Thanks for the feedback! I'll put together a short demo as well.
I'm also having a hard time with neuromancer, but I'm afraid that Gibson did this on purpose
In case anybody else was wondering who the Big 3 are: the article talks about the Detroit 3, which are Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis (the merger of Fiat-Chrysler and Peugeot with Dutch headquarter).
I was trying to draw a comparison in my question so that you could see the similarity, from my point of view.
The foundations of the Elixir type system [video]
> The example code is vey simplistic, so of course that linear code is more readable, but the idea doesn’t scale.

...that's basically why common sense and taste in programming is still required, it's not a purely mechanical task. That's also why I'm not entirely a fan of automatic code formatting tools, they don't understand the concept of nuance.
One important thing Jellyfin won't do is deciding to block something on its own.
Also, people are already misusing LLMs to generate blog spam, which regurgitates existing knowledge. Future LLMs will have to train on that as well.

The "Selfish Gene" strikes again.
That is not the gotcha you think it is…
Every slot system I've ever seen eventually implemented multiple named slots. Often after first only supporting one slot, then multiple unnamed slot and then finally the whole shebang.

Why go through that whole progress again with Nue? Or do you foresee some other way of doing highly customizable components?
Obviously that would have no growth potential.
Smartphones was the final nail, after that close to 100% of young adults are active online participants.

The good thing is that things aren't getting worse at least, all the idiots are already online.
Wing – The Intelligent Development Environment for Python
Discussed in other comments... but the zero-with-slash is only used in the flight plan section of that display; all of the other zeros are without the slash. It seems they only use the zero-with-slash where there might be a risk of ambiguity between 0 and O... everywhere else where it's just numeric readouts, there's no slash because there's no risk of confusion, and I'm guessing they decided zero-with-slash is more visually ugly/less intuitive for quickly reading numbers than zero-without-slash.
https://archive.is/A6yBM
There's no point in offering people something they can easily make themselves. Especially when it comes to machine translation.

I often see YouTube videos with gratingly bad Norwegian titles. I believe YouTube upranks videos if the creator provides translations, and plenty of sleazy video creators just machine translate their titles to umpteen languages. Since it's a low-context translation, just one random line pasted into GT with the translator having no idea what it's about, even the best machine translation in the world will frequently produce junk.

And I have to translate the junk back into English to understand what the title was probably supposed to be. It does not help me.

(By incentivizing this junk, Google is probably poisoning its own translation training data, but that's another matter).

So two hard rules should be

1. always leave up to the user whether to use machine translation or not

2. always clearly mark translated text, especially machine translated.

Gutenberg should not waste space hosting machine translated works, unless they put a lot of effort into ensuring the quality of the translations, effort that the user couldn't easily replicate.
Let's heat up the oven then check if the pizza is baked.
I actually feel really bad for the younger generation, actually. There's a whole bunch of teenagers who have no idea how good and useful computers can actually be, because all they ever have known is the shitty watered down mobile version of computing. Even desktops aren't as good as they used to be (thanks, Electron), but they're still a damn sight better than mobile. But if one grew up thinking that a phone/tablet is the end-all of computing, they have no idea what they're even missing.
As a reminder, this is the same Google that once announced unlimited photos and such. No one should be surprised when they come back and say oopsie.

Also, if you can replace the browser with Firefox, that'd be great - I might consider buying one.
The default should be reversed, don't break into smaller pieces unless there's a really good reason.
Please check the original post. This is a launch of the first item (Nue JS) in a new, uccoming frontend development ecosystem. One part of the ecosystem is a project called "Nue CSS", which aims to bring developers back to more standards based CSS development and it emphasizes that separation of concerns is a good thing (and not a bad thing as TW states).
Most of Europe is connected to 400V 3-phase grid.

When limited at a pretty common 40A, this delivers up to 16kW.

Tesla Superchargers routinely charge at 150kW.

I'd say they are well above 800V.
The penultimate paragraph of the article says almost exactly this
>It strikes me as an internal contradiction that you characterize my position as religious, but also characterize it as a dismissal if I point out that my opponent's position shares characteristics with religion.

Your argument was clearly pro-religion. Are not not religious? If you are, this falls flat. It was a dismissal because you straight called them "young and immature" and suggested a reckoning was coming. Come on... that's not being careful with your words whatsoever. Nor is it "respectful." Truly baffling.

>After all the spectrum of different Christian beliefs, number of different social groupings underneath the Christian umbrella, and internal heterogeneity of beliefs within those groups is so great, that, literally, wars have been fought over that.

You're talking about two different things here. Sets of beliefs versus classifications. I have no doubt if you asked people on the street in the US if Christianity was a religion 9/10 or better would say it was. This is not a serious argument, it's throwing shade only your in-group would understand.