skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
All slow indexing in CLion for rust were solved for me by locking toolchain to a specific version.
More specifically, couriers to hand deliver your messages, like Al Qaeda had.
Can you elaborate on why you think reddit is pushing out the weirdness? I don't think it's a zero sum game, you can have both normies and weirdos in entirely separate subreddits.
‘Credible’ Death Threat Causes Unity to Close Two Offices
If only this were true regarding the ChromeBook I bought 9 years ago.
They were already paying for it. The subscription model should be enough. It scales well enough for small devs to make decent amounts of money, and for Unity to get paid.

You act as though indie studios are using this tool for free when that is hardly the case. Past a certain revenue amount, they are required to upgrade to a paid license which is totally fair. Game not taking off? No worries. It is just wasted effort. Game take off and you make lots of money? GREAT! You get to upgrade to a paid model of a tool you already use.

It was a WAY more fair model. If they are that hard up for money, they should have just announced a subscription price increase. Not retroactively price gouging for games that have already been released.
I believe this would be the Chief Information Officer or whoever else is in charge of running AI for that enterprise?
Do the opposite (make lots of cold water) for places that need cooling. Am I missing something?
this would mean for many companies Marl is the power user
Why would anyone think that a large overall pool of happiness is somehow better than a high per capita happiness? This seems like the kind of thing that's incredibly obvious to everyone but the academic philosopher.
It is realistic. Only problem is that costs of storage have to be lower than the delta. Which is the problem for renewables + storage.

Basically you need to be able to cover the whole cost of installation in reasonable time by doing this arbitrage. And that possibly isn't simple.
> you can't both say "public policy will change purchasing decisions" and "appetite for such public policy changes is pretty weak."

Fortunately I didn’t say that:

> People make purchasing decisions based on their environment, and that environment is heavily influenced by public policy.

Your editorializing of public policy has an impact in general, to public policy will move in this direction is doing the heavy lifting here and is putting words in my mouth.

Ultimately, policy is a choice, it isn’t something that exists as a force of nature that we can’t control. While I share your pessimism that anything will get done, that pessimism can’t be left to become a self fulfilling prophecy.
Epic is a highly profitable private company controlled by the founder. They have no incentive to mess with a business model that works; their margins are higher than Unity.

Unity has over 3x as many employees as Epic, much lower margins, is publicly traded, and they've been losing money hand over fist. Everything is subject to change until they make money, shut down, or are acquired.
It's a convenient way to appear like a victim. The vast majority of "death threats" aren't serious, when you work at a large enough scale you will always be able to find a "death threat" to use as a justification.
https://www.crunchydata.com/blog/active-active-postgres-16 may interest you, also, which showed up recently https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37510260
Trilateration (same technique as used for mobile network location - in addition to the GPS on the phone)
I found the terms of service page to be fantastic.

Easier to understand than most I see.
I think they meant eating 500 calories below their normal need. Eating 500 calories per day will loose you 4 pounds a week, not one (as they mentioned).
One of this big problems is that this change doesn't just apply to new Unity titles, but every single Unity title already released. This means that if a developer released a Unity game a few years ago, they're still on the hook for these new fees, despite the fact they never agreed to it. These developers are now forced to pay these new fees (even if the fees eclipse the ongoing revenue for a game), or de-list the game entirely. This also completely erodes trust with Unity, as even developers willing to pay the new fees are scared that Unity will unexpectedly add more costs in the future.
5 years is a flash in chip design. Initial design to tape-out is 3 years at the leading edge if you're really good.

Maybe in 5-10 years, RISC-V gains share in initial designs, but the semiconductor design process is loooong.

And if you're going to talk about Microcontrollers and simpler chips, keep in mind we had a bunch of other RISC architectures a decade ago that all lost to Cortex-M for simplicity/cost reasons (RIP MIPS).
tor/vpn/proxy by itself does not provide adequate anonymity. creepjs proves that ALL browsers are unique (even TBB) if someone just probes the right bits.
Reasonable question! I ask myself the same. Always good to open to other points of view!
Midjourney – For React
Not "exactly". Twitter artificially boosted its new owner's tweets, the site regularly returned errors after shutting down data centers, and users who were previously banned for hate speech were allowed back on the platform. And while 3rd party apps might not have had huge adoption relative to the size of twitter, I know a few people for whom that was the last straw.
You don't use gdocs to learn gdocs. You use it to write an essay or something. It is a tool, like a pen.
Did this guy get radicalised against fossil fuel alternatives because he listened to one too many fossil shills or is he himself one of the fossil shills? I guess at this stage it doesn't really matter.
I wonder how well SoftBank did with this IPO. If it was a decent enough return, I’d say it’s good news for new SoCs and chipmakers that want to innovate.
His craft may be writing software that maximizes profit.
Which ones aren't we using?

I get the "opportunity" to be a shitty developer in multiple languages all at the same time - Python, Scala, Angular, and Java, to name a few main ones.

All these people naming just one language (or even 2) are making me jealous. I'd probably be less shitty if I got to focus.
There is also:

3. Science the institution.

As in "What Science says about X" as if there was a single
authoritative, coherent entity we could call Science.
Some of us have been that guy.
> > - Motherboard no longer charges battery Current: replace motherboard Repairability: replace capacitors utilizing schematics

> Some marginally related remarks:

> Most faulty capacitors were manufactured around 2000s ( see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague ). Those days are long gone. Most battery charging issue now are unrelated to capacitor .

> l

While that's true the point still stands that we don't have access to supply chain parts to fix reparable charging issues.
The concept of HOA is pure evil, not every single instance of it. Even if yours is fine right now, this can change next year when other people move in and take the whole thing over in order to make your life miserable.
> The first thing you need to know about Marl is that he has the attention span of a goldfish on acid. Once Marl opens your app, you have about 1.3 seconds to catch his attention with a shiny image or triggering headline, otherwise he’ll swipe back to TikTok and never open your app again. Marl’s tolerance for user interface complexity is zero. As far as you can tell he only has one working thumb, and the only thing that thumb can do is flick upwards in a repetitive, zombielike scrolling motion.

Whenever I express a negative sentiment about some aspect of modern software that takes away power and choice from the user in favor of baby-tier handholding and get the usual reply that goes something like "well the average user doesn't need or care about that so it shouldn't exist!", this is who I imagine typing out the comment on the other side of the screen.
IMVHO Johnny Decimal is a good system for paper archives in classic filing cabinets / furniture with many drawers, not much reasonable for computer-based systems.

Beside that IME in PKM/PIM terms we need taxonomies just to manage storage, if it's not managed alone. In that case a time-based taxonomy like an year-based root, a month based II level or so it's enough for storage handling and eventual "time traveling" in noted contents. I have almost anything in org-mode/org-attached binaries, org-mode tangle-d configs and so on, I've tried various taxonomies and in the end just choosing to have subdirs of my org mode root dir one per year just to manage contents. Similarly this is how I split my Beancount-ed personal finance, one note per month.

org-roam-node-find title-based search&narrow access + eventual ripgrep full-text-search are good enough to find anything. Rarely I've used org-ql but it's simply too long to keep consistent notes even with templates to use an SQL-alike querying.
How exactly do the AI's find "untapped use cases"? This sounds extremely valuable depending on how it is done.
That ruling only applies to federal courts. FDCPA claims can be, and sometimes are, filed in state courts, which are allowed to be more permissive about standing rules (to the extent permitted by state constitutions and laws) than federal courts.
> This is more than capitalism, it's freedom. If you are suggesting that we spend more money on Ebola or public transport, that's tyranny.

Anything can be whatever if you define your terms in obtuse or unusual ways.

Launder it by burying the questionable definitions a couple layers down from the garbage you’ve set out to “prove”, and you can fool even some smart folks.
Telling of what?

Not trying to be snarky, I am genuinely curious.
The deal with apple is probably 0.1% of revenue from all hardware sales that contain ARM IP or something similar.

Which means that if Apple decide to switch to RISC-V to save money, the deal is still in effect, but no money will be paid, so there might as well be no deal.
> I don't understand why anyone takes them seriously.

People don't take them seriously, they're used in cases like this to try to look like an innocent victim of radicals. Given a large enough company it is /always/ going to be possible to find a "death threat".
Install count and hardware based DRM in games is notoriously bad. Reports of "I changed a graphics card and now the game is locking me out" are as old as time.

It is a solution that can be done more, or less, correctly or fairly. But the problem is that it is easy to get it wrong, it is easy to implement this incorrectly.

Given how slipshod and slapdash these announcements and responses and walkbacks have been, you can't really have any faith that they will fall into the "right" side of things.
Apple holds a rare Architecture license to the ARM ISA due to their role as a founding partner, and can make original implementations without incurring licensing dues, as they do with the A and M series CPUs. I understand why they would want to switch to homegrown designs instead of licensing ARM reference designs (which they do have to pay for), but why migrate instruction sets too when RISC-V doesn't save them any marginal cost over novel ARM designs that would be binary compatible with the existing firmware?
Honestly, 2000 shares is nothing for JR. I expect he probably probably participates in the employee stock purchase program and offloads those shares each quarter.
Honestly, I'm happy about that. I'm already a paying customer, and this hopefully increases how many resources dedicated to rust support.
It depends entirely on the merchant and what checks they have enabled. Some people like authorize.net may even lower your fees/bills if you require stricter address verification for example.
Advertising is the reason for the surveilance. The whole reason Facebook gathers all this data on its users is to drive their ad platform.
> I think you just reinvented sex work, but somehow made it more icky?

Or possibly expensive engagement/wedding rings in non-jewellery form.

On a separate point, some of my socialist (and in a few cases literally communist) friends assert that the issues at the intersection of sex work with consent also apply to all other work under capitalism; I don't have a strong counter-argument to this.

Money is fundamentally unnatural, so it's not surprising that it feels wrong and icky in a lot of situations.
My company is working on this. 50 kWh modules, similar cost/kWh to battery storage, but no lithium or rare earths. Optimized for daily 0-100% cycling.

http://www.vortical.io
Demucs is awesome no doubt.

>plus you can run it with GPU support as well!

Open-Unmix also originally runs on the GPU like it was intended for, since it uses PyTorch just like Demucs.

I'm curious about using WASM + WebGPU to add GPU acceleration to this project, though.
Shouldn't someone be subsidizing solar panels over there?

It would have a lot more Co2 reduction than here, since they'd no longer be forced to use random crappy generators, it would probably save lives by eliminating monoxide poisonings, and if they're ramping up use of air conditioning that's a lot of daytime load.
You can always spot an emotionally-driven law (as opposed to one driven by logic) by the fact that it requires carve-outs for 75 different edge cases to be passable.

Critics will call this the work of “special interests,” but this means the law itself was actually passed to please a special interest group.

If we can agree that’s it’s a dumb law under that many different scenarios — then it’s not a good piece of legislation.
> They're often quite successful with this, although they recently had to admit defeat with USB-C.

Painting this as an adversarial scenario doesn't really hold up to scrutiny; Apple was heavily involved in the development of USB-C.
In this particular case, it's because the success of an ad-funded service depends on the amount of users it has.

If you don't like the repugnant conclusion you have to change something in the conditions of the environment so that you make it not be true. Arguing against it and calling your refutation obvious doesn't do anything.
Yes, there is no general definition of "quality." But every industry and product has its own internal, domain-specific definition of quality. For hard drives, "quality" is MTBF. For batteries, "quality" is measured in loss of charge capacity per charge cycle.

Or let me put it this way: the commercial/industrial versions of these products do some things differently. Why do they do those things? To increase "quality." If the industry didn't know what its "quality" metric was, then it would be impossible for them to make the commercial/industrial product "better" for long-term commercial/industrial use than the consumer one.

In any industry where the commercial/industrial version of a product — one that lasts decades in heavy use — is already an existence proof for the possibility of "quality" in the product category, you can simply regulate that the consumer version must also be made to last at least N years of regular consumer-duty use. Doesn't matter how they accomplish that. Maybe they can't accomplish that, with positive margins, at a price point anyone is willing to buy, at first. Oh well. Keep trying.

Compare/contrast: FDA stage-3 drug trials — the trial phase that tests drug efficacy. It's up to the drug's manufacturer to declare to the FDA what effect the drug is supposed to have — it's the very same effect the company is applying to the FDA to be able to market the drug as having. An efficacy trial, is simply the FDA demanding, from a drug's manufacturer, proof positive of its own planned marketing claims about the drug. That efficacy proof uses metrics specific to the pathology that the drug treats — and likely metrics invented by the drug manufacturer themselves, while researching the problem. But crucially, the manufacturer, before even starting the trial, has to convince the FDA that these metrics are sensible ones to measure efficacy by; and also has to work with the FDA to reach a consensus on what would constitute a satisfactory level of efficacy for their drug (i.e. what metrics thresholds are meant by a marketing claim like "relieves headaches.")
Is economics really a science?

Economics is generally regarded as a social science, although some critics of the field argue that economics falls short of the definition of a science for a number of reasons, including a lack of testable hypotheses, lack of consensus, and inherent political overtones. Despite these arguments, economics shares the combination of qualitative and quantitative elements common to all social sciences [0]

[0] https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/030315/economics-sc...
I haven't seen spam in decades. What are you doing wrong?
This post: A long article about weight loss that is built on a calorie-centric approach to food instead of questioning that fundamental premise and differentiating between types of fats and carbs and their effects on body weight.

I've commented on this in the past but to reiterate, calories as a measure are pseudo-scientific at best and totally bunk at worst. If all you are doing is looking at that number on packaging, generally speaking, your weight control will be very limited due to the lack of precision in that measurement.
Blaming any particular user is victim blaming and shifts responsibility away from those responsible: creators. (Let's assume commercial apps with paying users rather than volunteer freeware.)

Whoever acts as the product manager or manager for UX needs to concurrently field input from users as signals rather than directly actionable feedback AND not be so self-absorbed with coding, grand feature plans, or what they "want" that they cannot prioritize use-cases of users in the real world (e.g., user-centric agile-ish development).

Another issue is that popular apps backed by major corporations tend to drift away from their roots because their developers and product managers tend to be rewarded for features and appearances of work than steady consistency and usability rather than fixing bugs, maintaining what already exists, or improving bad UX.
People get very heated and religious about this topic so I'm hesitant to bring it up but there are strong arguments that this model is overly simplistic and that the types of food you eat are strongly related to hormonal changes that dramatically affect your metabolism and fat storage. Here's a good talk by a doctor, heavy on research, that's a decent introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKC3hiyLeRc
It's not an oversight. Let's them start with less hurdle from oversight authorities.

Also focussing on a market reduces investment in localisation and then having unsustainable small local bubbles.

(And ensures I won't waste my time trying it, as I'd have to bypass too many hurdles for making it work)
I accept, thanks comrade.
People Are Worried About the Basis Trade
Get a store card, use it for things you would have bought anyway. You can build from there. Note that your credit report doesn't really care about how much you borrowed, but how good you were about paying it back.
I would love to know the entire backend stack of threads. From their load balancers to Database schemas.
Why is this getting downvoted? It seems to me that a lot of the media-focused anti-piracy tooling is essentially a performance of toughness to make rightsholder execs comfortable. Everybody accepts you can't stop piracy entirely, and nobody's willing to say, "Fuck it, we'll compete on convenience and strong consumer relationships," so we all put up with this weird middle ground of performative DRM and the like. With only the rare occasional bit of honesty, as from Weird Al: https://sfba.social/@williampietri/110906012997848549
There is also a problem with how apps are made, they depend way too much on environment calls. And obviously adding 50 permissions isn't realistic.

Now, making the base process manual doesn't mean that the user will need to do the same thing over and over. I am not against automation, but I believe that it should come from the user, not a fancy system that some external entity decided is the best way to handle permission.

By outsourcing the responsibility to your data, you are effectively giving up on understanding it.

Ideally, I believe that consumer computers should become interactive/programmable systems where the OS is responsible for exposing all the environment calls, and the apps all stateless functions. The process of mapping environment access to app is manual, but create consent AND customizability. Plus additional benefits like easing the development of cross-platform applications and maintainability.
https://archive.ph/im6X6
$75k if you mean the usual amount in controversy requirement for diversity jurisdiction, no? Anyway, the FDCPA specifically gives federal courts jurisdiction over FDCPA violations “regardless of the amount in controversy”, so there’s no minimum.

Still, the FDCPA jurisdiction provision is non-exclusive, meaning state courts also remain a viable option.
I am definitely seeing a market need for concrete user data and insights into how GPT is being used or underutilized.
This seems a serious limitation. Bash is my file manager - ls and cd. I would not give that up for any tool no matter how convenient.

But presumably there is some API or ABI to monitor, or some signal emitted, when files are moved, added, updated, or deleted. However iwaitnotify works, could that be incorporated (even theoretically) into TMSU?
It's just a question of if you value other people existing or not. If you don't, focus on per-capita happiness, if you do then you focus on meeting a minimum threshold of happiness for everyone.

I don't see how you couldn't value other people existing – I think they have just as much of a right to experience the universe as I do.
Can ChatGPT Write Code?
Yes this exactly. Apologies for not being clear.
Edward Bernays, the father of modern public relations/propaganda, wrote in the 1920s about such flaws of democracy. He directly employed terms similar to "shadow government". He was not a fringe dissident or "conspiracy theorist", he was a influential member of the establishment, who participated in the overthrow of Latin American governments. You really should read at least the intro of Propaganda (1928). Here are the first three sentences:

> The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.

This is written by a guy who did that for a living.

Acknowledging the systemic flaws of liberal democracy is not a conspiracy theory. In fact, it is the opposite: it explains the reality of modern democracy in terms of structural factors and incentives. That said, he also describes actual conspiracies e.g. how particular advertisement campaigns operated.

This was well-understood a century ago.

The people who regurgitate what they learn in their state-approved textbooks/movies are more akin to conspiracy theorists; it requires a certain level of fantastical thinking to believe that USA (or RF), on a national level, is a de facto democracy.
Blueprints have terrible performance. They just do. Even trying to compile them into c++ doesn't work well.

Blueprints run at least 100x-1000x slower than equivalent c++.

This isn't even discussing working with multiple coders and version control, which is also a disaster.

If you are making a simple game then they can work. If you aren't then they are not great.
Litereplica Allows Your Applications to Easily Keep Replicas of SQLite Databases
>A monopoly (from Greek μόνος, mónos, 'single, alone' and πωλεῖν, pōleîn, 'to sell'), as described by Irving Fisher, is a market with the "absence of competition", creating a situation where a specific person or enterprise is the only supplier of a particular thing.