skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While I like it, it also has shortcomings. For example, while gpt-4-32k is listed in https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4, it is not available for accounts that have access to its 8k-token variant, gpt-4-32k.
you can get a loan for college, not for the stock market.
No one's dictating your choices? If you thought eating glass was tasty it wouldn't be factually inaccurate to tell you that it's bad for you. Same idea for hyperpalatable foods.

Strictly speaking, I'm not sure that the US is founded on doing what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law but I do think that's an increasingly common understanding. A nation state does have some stake in maintaining the basic health of its people, whether you agree that's desirable or, if it is, to what degree.
Seth Godin did a whole Akimbo podcast that was written by ChatGPT, and the audio was AI generated. The voice was spot on, the content and delivery was dead. I almost fell asleep listening to it, which is NEVER the case for any other episode of Akimbo I've listened to.
Did you open the linked paper in the OP?

Gorilla is compared;

ToolLLM seems to postdate this project.
Probably needs major repairs: i bet it doesn't even fly.
Does this campaign target societies with excess child raring or societies what are about to collapse (that is all clearly below 2.1 children on average per woman)?

If the first, then this is the right thing to do as we have to find a balance (and we know where the balance is exactly), if the last then fy seriously, because it only makes the matter worse and doesn't give any help - a positive exponential process always trumps the negative one - you have to make all of them negative or close to 0 to actually succeed, of course negative process is also a dead end in the long run.

Do you understand this?
That's not very relevant.

If you start developing a new software today, it won't need to run on those computers. And if it's old enough that it need to, you can bet all of those architectural decisions were already made and written into stone all over the place.
Indeed, certainly nobody is doing an overhaul just to implement the design system, because the business case for that (unfortunately) is too hard to make. And obviously, if you've got a DS and building some new front end from scratch then you're going to use it.

But in my experience, when upgrading tech or introducing new features that involve cracking open the FE codebase, there is extreme pressure to do the cheapest/fastest thing. If a product manager asks his team how long it would take to do X, then how long it would take to do it AND update various things to use the DS in the process, that extra work seldom gets signed off. "No extra opex on my budget".
lol have fun building a CUDA competitive. Let us know when you have the drivers.
Somewhere in London some intern at gov.uk is still not finished rewriting all the god-save-the-queen-hr-<color> CSS class names to god-save-the-king-...
OMG yes. I had no idea that had been invented and added to Illustrator -- that's exactly what I've been looking for. Thank you so much!
I was not aware of that court case, but that is enlightening. I have much learning to do.

But based on reading through the report at the findlaw article in a sibling comment, (in my opinion) I think it's a pretty dangerous precedent, and definitely a pillar of the breakdown of modern political discourse.
OpenAPI has great affordances for providing examples along with pertinent documentation sections. Many OpenAPI UIs provide ways to execute those examples or other interactive ways to populate and try requests. These could surely be better honed for the how-to guide style of documentation! But I think that’s probably a better place to start for people who are starting at, and looking to go beyond, what OpenAPI currently provides.
Could this be ported to a simple smartphone app, if it works only by listening? I'm sure many people would find it useful in that form as well.
Breaking NASA JWST Discovers Microbial Life on K2-18B
Bank deposits have had terrible yields over the last generation or so. But even if you place your money at 0% real interest rate, if you spend only 60% of your net income, you will still have enough after 50 years of savign to live another 25-30 years at the same standard of living.

And if you put your money in something like global index funds, it would take something like large scale war for it to not give a positive real yield. Even just a 2-3 real interest becomes quite significant if left ot accrue over 50 years.
"the biggest risk will be other people."

Idk from my understanding of natural disasters, failed states, and others, it seems to me that people continue to form social contracts continuously. It's kinda our whole thing, as a species. People absolubtely can be brutal, but a majority of people just kinda try to keep going, and often do extrodinary things to help people in their community continue.
My partner suffers from post-Covid issues: can you tell me what you mean by LDN?
FYI, Windows supports Unix domain sockets since Windows 10 / Server 2019.
Is it possible for the west to build enough factories fast enough to offset a cutoff from China ?

It’s obvious a conflict would lower the standard of living for both countries, but I suspect Chinese people are willing to put up with worse qualities of life compared to westerners.

China went though a boom in quality of life, so in the same lifetime they are “returning” to what they had before.

Americans especially lived a pretty cushy life for the last few generations.
StarCraft (1998) remained big, right as every single RTS released after it went 3D.

StarCraft II is usually played competitively on low graphics settings, to improve visual clarity. The game is 13 years old, and on high graphics still looks fine when compared to any modern title.
Tutorial takes you from an exact point A to an exact point B. Guide is much "looser" and just describes the general steps to get something done, without making any type of guarantee of being able to take you exactly from A to B. Mostly out of acknowledgment that the real-world is messy and everyone is going to have a slightly different system. Tutorial is for people starting from scratch or who want a gentle hands-on intro to your thing, guide is for people who are doing messy integration work with existing systems. It's not a perfect delineator but it'll get you most of the way there...
iChatbook – Chat with Your Books AI
That is a limitation of the tooling we have unfortunately. Every line in the text files that is not code increases the cognitive load of the person when not directly relevant. And unfortunately a lot of development is done on laptops or otherwise screen restrained machines.

I agree in principle that the metadata and code should be linked and easily pop in view on demand. But that is not how the tooling currently works and we find only crutches.

This is cool paradigm that could make amazing startup. Add in some LLM for buzzword to hook investors. And actually LLM that can trawl all the current sources of knowledge and spitting a one paragraph to glance what and why is going on could even work.

But we can't do it while constraining to text files. We need the equivalent of hypertext for code ... and it will be mess in the end.
> "H. G. Wells",

Right. That's probably the most common historical form, and is a good example of how the punctuation for sentence-ends and abbreviations is often the same - period and then single-space.
> I am asking if there is any legal precedent for the government forcing any traditional publisher to explain what legal speech they choose or refuse to publish.

Either you're failing to understand the question, or you're trying to be disingenuous about it.

Newspapers editorialize their content. Elon Musk's Twitter is not, and is claiming to have no control over what content third parties publish throught their service.

However, Elon Musk's Twitter is also manipulating the contents that third parties publish through their service by means of moderation/censorship and boosting.

Given they claim they hold no editorial control over what goes through their pipes but still manipulate the content, they have a responsibility to demonstrate that they are not liable for that content by specifying exactly which rules they enforce and how they enforce them.

Do you understand the difference between assuming responsibility over the content, and claiming that they are not liable for the content they distribute because they don't pick and choose what goes through their pipes?
Sequoia PGP: A new OpenPGP library
Even when using “excessive” you can infer the overall meaning to be “excessively tasty food”. Unlike “junk food” the former doesn’t confer negativity - in fact the opposite. Who doesn’t want excessively tasty food? And excessively tasty food isn’t necessarily bad for you. It’s pear season and the fruits are excessively palatable - but they’re not unhealthy.
He's saying that His coming has fulfilled the prophecies of the Messiah, and that the other prophecies of the Old Testament are still in effect.

Please read a list of translations of that verse here, along with the original Greek https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-18.htm and come to your own conclusion of whether it has anything at all to do with a literal interpretation.
> You cant expect to have immunity under section 230 if you arent going to provide "good samaritan" blocking and screening of offensive material.

This is actually incorrect. Section 230 _allows_ blocking and screening, but doesn't _require_ it.
It boils down to greed. Targeted ads are proven to have larger profits, which increases the more precise the targeting is.

No advertiser wants to go back to dumb ad campaigns like they used to run on traditional media, simply because they're far less profitable.

Which is why they're concerned about the restricted and more general profiles the Topics API will give them. They want even more granular topics[1], and Google can do this at any point once the controversy has died down, and this feature gains traction.

Make no mistake that if this turns out to be less profitable, many advertisers will still resort to cookie tracking, fingerprinting, and any other shady mechanism, as long as the browser and lack of regulation allow them to do so.

[1]: https://searchengineland.com/googles-topics-api-advertisers-...
> a business is a public danger

Every business? A mom and pop grocery store is a business. A old-fashioned diner that serves actual cooked food instead of microwaved pre-processed junk is a business. Are they public dangers?

> Making a profit and doing public good are completely separate imperatives

No, they're not. "Making a profit", in a sane economy, means creating wealth. Businesses are an essential tool for creating wealth.

The problem is that we do not have a sane economy. We have governments that we have given vast regulatory powers, and that means corporations that are big enough to buy politicians can make a profit without creating wealth, by buying regulations that skew the economy in their favor. The effect of the regulations is not to make it easier to run a business but to make it harder, so much harder that only the large corporations can afford to do it--which means the mom and pop small businesses that actually create wealth can no longer exist. We also have governments that print money and give it to financial institutions in order to make cheap loans available to the same large corporations, so they can expand cheaply and drive out small business competitors. That's why we have big box stores and chain restaurants in strip malls next to freeways instead of mom and pop stores and old fashioned diners in actual town centers.

But, as the saying goes, the problem is not that politicians can be bought but that they have something valuable to sell. As long as large corporations can buy regulations that favor them, they will. And as long as we let governments print money and give it to those they favor, that will just make things worse.
Go right ahead and ignore my second sentence.
Excluded me twice. It almost seems like it's set up to allow only inputs that lead to a "you're screwed" result. Bit of an agenda, perhaps?
How do you plan on setting up the $1.5m?

90% invested, 10% cash?

what are the investments going to look like? 100% index funds? What if the market doesn't return 7-10%? What's your plan, draw down 4% a year, 1% a quarter?

S&P500 index fund has a 1.5% dividend, so you only need to draw 4 - 1.5 = 2.5% (0.625% a quarter), unless you'd let the dividends reinvest and then sell them off.

You can get treasuries/bonds yielding 4-5% for short term now, not sure about a 15-30 year outlook.

Annunities and other weird things (high dividend yield ETFs) are an option but anything other than trying to find 4%+ is not without risks.

Plus your expenses are $30k now. In 2020, what were they? $25k? They won't be $30k forever (as you know).

I just can't imagine being in a position where I need to sell off 1% of my portfolio quarterly to live no matter the conditions of the market. The stock market can perform like crap for years at a time. Your net worth in stocks can drawdown up to 40-50% in 'worst case scenarios'
TCP loopback connection vs. Unix Domain Socket performance
Companies are more efficient/productive with in office workers.

Throw all the click-minded news articles and anecdotes in the world at me. These leaders aren't idiots and they are definitely crunching numbers. If full remote was more profitable, they would do it. Full stop.

The headline should be "90% of companies find in office work more profitable". Because that is all they really care about.
I worked with several extroverted managers (attorneys) who understood that uninterrupted dev time was important without me needing to prompt them, and had several others, both introverted and extroverted, that just insisted on my attention whenever it was most convenient for them. While it's quite likely that among two people who lack boundaries, an extroverted manager (also not the same as not being able to sit still, which is more likely something akin to ADHD Impulsive) would be more likely to be annoying about it, but the problem is lacking boundaries and self-control in the workplace, not their social compulsions.
The Future of Design-Dev Alignment and Methodology
I am the CEO and co-founder of Anima - Automated design to code (i.e. Figma to React).

With over 600K installs, Anima is the #1 tool for developers in the Figma store and was recently named a representative vendor of the design-to-code space by Gartner.

I talked recently about the future of product design and development teams, and here, I put things in writing.
This title was likely truncated because a lot of click bait titles start with the word "this".
To add, there is a whole field of biologically-plausible learning. Predictive coding is one such method. It is isomorphic to SGD[1], and doesn't require global computation. ie it's backprop-free optimization. Although slower than SGD on silicon, it's massively parallelizible which ends up making it more biologically plausible rather than less.

1. 2020 PREDICTIVE CODING APPROXIMATES BACKPROP ALONG
ARBITRARY COMPUTATION GRAPHS https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.04182.pdf
So? That's still the standard response.

All this bill is doing is saying that the company has to state what their rules for this are.
Courts have said: Companies are just groups of people. So a person, employed by Twitter, has the same free speech rights as anyone else. If you force a company to take certain actions, a person in the company must perform that action... and forcing that person to take certain actions may be a violation of that person's rights.
Air pollution is worse in some places than other places. Back in the 1960s inner cities black kids got an extra dose of fumes from tetraethyl lead in gasoline, that damaged their brains, lowered I.Q. and possibly caused a crime wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead–crime_hypothesis

See also “environmental racism”

https://www.nrdc.org/stories/what-environmental-racism

which is very much a real thing even if it didn’t really work as a rallying point to organize around in the 1990s which activists were hoping for.
> Meanwhile, "clever" things like zero cost map and filter are prioritized and in the language for a long time.

This is because of what the language is trying to do. Providing map and filter with zero is a priority 0. I think people think Rust had more development manpower than it actually had. Java/C# (and I would bet Go) have had significantly more money poured into them than Rust.
I don't want to get too far in the weeds in this thread, that's not kind to the forum. If you want to start a new thread on the topic, I am happy to contribute there. My efforts are focused on the micro: do you as an individual not want kids? I will do everything in my power to affirm that choice, and it is one of the most impactful choices one can make in life with regards to quality of life and suffering. Unwanted children cause both the children and the parent(s) to suffer (having grown up in a volatile home, I've given back by volunteering as a Guardian ad Litem [1] in the legal system and have seen the childhood suffering first hand). Millions of children go hungry every day, hundreds of thousands are in foster care, not to mention those foster kids then go on to suboptimal and challenging lives once adults (US centric). Roughly 40-50% of all annual pregnancies are unintended, both in the US and globally [2].

With regards to the macro or economics, I could care less of ponzi schemes that rely on an ever growing population. There are 8 billion people on this Earth, and we'll top out between 9-10 at the end of the century. If that number drops in half, or even more, that is not the end of humanity, simply pain on a suboptimal economic system that will need to adapt to the wishes of citizens participating within in.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/guardian_ad_litem

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37300184 (citations)
My normal temp is legit 97.6F and so if I approach 98.6, then it's almost cause for concern. I can't explain it, and none of my doctors have even tried.
Why do you believe that? And more importantly, where is the data to back it up? It’s more likely that the top third of high school grads are more capable than the bottom third of college grads. Regardless, the report I just linked to accounts for this.
Deepchecks: Open-source ML testing and validation library
Your reply is not indicative of someone capable of a good faith conversation on the topic, but I'll bite.

I think you don't understand what the hard and easy problems are that underly the solutions I'm talking about.

For example: you repeatedly reply to people talking about the length of the prompts, but end users don't need to write prompts. It's trivial to append instructions around what a user says.

On the other hand, you keep replying to people with "how is that not just Siri" when people describe the LLM demonstrating zero-shot classification for example, but you don't seem to understand how difficult of a problem that has been for ML. Those contrived chat logs you see are demonstrating multiple discrete classifications that would have each cost untold hundreds of thousands of dollars in development of recommender systems to replicate just a few years ago.

—

Most people couldn't even dream of building a Spotify song recommender from first principles that could capture nuance like that chat demonstrated with an army of engineers. The fact is today, right now, that's something someone could hack into a real usable personal recommender in a weekend.

At the end of the day LLMs don't make all problems easier, and they make some problems harder: but the problems they make easier are extremely hard problems. I think if you're not familiar with how hard some of the things they're doing are, then the things they're doing poorly glare out much brighter.

If you spend half that weekend is spent fighting the LLM to output JSON the right way, it sure sounds like LLMs are just dumb hype machines... but it doesn't reflect the sheer impossibility of the value they're providing within that same system.
Developer Copywriting Mistakes to Avoid
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/02/11/september-11th...

This is the greatest article written for an actual 9/11 hero.
If they get benefits, maybe they can have the downsides like being arrested, imprisoned, and even executed.
I can add another 20 cents to the fund, and it will be bigger commitement from my side.
Agreed, that's exactly what we're doing with Definite[0]. We spin up Cube[1] for all our customers and the results vs. directly generating SQL are much better. Cube has some other really nice out of the box features too (e.g. caching).

0 - https://www.definite.app/
1 - https://cube.dev/
> If you start developing a new software today, it won't need to run on those computers.

This is a weird argument to make.

For context, I work on mesh overlay VPNs at Defined.net. We initially used Unix domain sockets for our daemon-client control model. This supported Windows 10 / Server 2019+.

We very quickly found our users needed support for Server 2016. Some are even still running 2012.

Ultimately, as a software vendor, we can't just force customers to upgrade their datacenters.
> passing up on less invitations from my friends

This is obviously a personal anecdote and ultra variable-dependent but my entire elementary school -> middle school -> high school friendbase hang out exclusively in Discord playing video games/watching sporting events digitally instead of in person. I wonder how widespread this is.
>you can point out various crises and low points, but generally every factor has worked in their favor.

Except for the crises and low points, of course. My first mortgage was 11% interest, inflation was roaring but there was still a recession (see "stagflation"[0]). Don't forget the 20% drop in stock market value in 1987. And the oil embargo[1]. And the Bush (1st) and Clinton tax increases.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation

[1]https://www.britannica.com/event/Arab-oil-embargo
The 'electronagativity' was a handwave for 'the chemical and physical properties of the element'. E.g. the solubility of its salts or other compounds in water, processes that cycle or collect it elsewhere, etc.

Nitrogen is less reactive than Oxygen, doesn't form as many compounds as Carbon and has a molecule too fat to easily escape into space.
Monado SLAM datasets now available
You could always pay for retirement by building a few houses out of Roman concrete, that would stand for 1000 years with no maintainance.
Are they? This article focuses on the temperature delta from 2022-2023, not our impact collectively. The thesis is that human (in)action can't explain the severity of the delta over a single year. The eruption appears to fill in the gap.

This qualifies as culture-war gas? The article does not ignore human climate impact. There's a big CO2 graph right in the middle.
> How in the hell can a corporation claim that it has free speech?

"Corporations are people" when it comes to rights and privileges, but when it comes to damages and criminality, they are vague, amorphous entities that cannot possibly be held liable for anything. Very convenient for them.