skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
One has to decide what business they are in. I recall reading that long ago when I picked up some MBA books.

Examples:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2020/09/0...

Mentions Theodore Levitt, In a more condensed form than HBR.

https://hbr.org/2006/10/what-business-are-you-in-classic-adv...

Product or advertising? Small outfits can't serve two masters well. One is tough enough.
probably, lol! Or food service for that matter.
It's called an iPad and it already has an M1. My son and all his friends almost exclusively game on iPads. So the next generation will be more used to touch screens then game controllers
I have all of these apps and they are fantastic
Well said, I've also been using Gandi for quite some time now. I recently moved a .com domain over to Cloudflare. However, I'm still using them for some ccTLDs that Cloudflare doesn't yet support.
> Even more surprisingly was that Tucows – the domain registrar with the third most domains globally – wasn’t mentioned even once.

Tucows doesn't sell domains under their own name. They are the parent company of Hover, which is the brand they do direct sales under. Tucows is at number 5 on the list. (They also have other subsidiaries specifically for resellers.)
There is a certain irony that outside Windows, the best .NET IDE is based on the JVM.

All because of politics.
I think that this would be this list, not sure about jurisdiction...

Reddit

Pinterest

Snap

TikTok

X

LinkedIn

WeChat

Youtube

Meta
>the numbers listed in the article you provided are quite low, in the order of 100 per year (and falling).

Those were deaths in the US, not globally or in the Americas. The US has just about the highest percentage of households with ACs of any country in the world and so is, broadly speaking, less susceptible to deaths from severe heatwaves even should they occur. Globally, the figure is more like five million [1] between heat and cold.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/08/extreme-temper...
Very eloquently put.

I often find it interesting how when these types of issues come up, technologists often interpret it using "transitive rules" that are natural in math and engineering, but "the real world" doesn't follow this logical progression. That is, if you have "A implies B, and B implies C, and C implies D, then A implies D". The problem is that in "the real world" there are enough slight differences at each step that most people feel that A does not imply D.

Point being, there are lots of comments here along the lines of "If creating art with a tool can be copyrighted, how is art created with Photoshop copyrightable but art created with AI is not". The difference is that most people (and, most importantly, the US Copyright Office) believe that AI crosses the line between being "just a tool" to actually being the author of significant parts of the work. The fact that that line is gray is not a fundamental problem, and as you point out it occurs all the time in the legal realm.
NP! FWIW, I sucked it up and added a text version to my PhotoStructure emails. I didn’t want to give GOOG an single excuse to not deliver my email.

(Also: I suspect you need to escape your <img> tag in “ensuring that every has an alt tags”)
Cool project! I'm very interested in accurate preservation of the behavior of these old systems (chip decapping and scanning, FPGA reimplementation, accuracy-focused emulators) and using Ghidra to reverse engineer old games, especially on the 6502 and m68k architectures. Just an enthusiastic spectator at this point, but I hope to contribute something to the field eventually.

A sidenote: the action at 0:19 in the 50x-speed demo is intriguing. I've played many hours of Super Mario Brothers and watched various tool-assisted speedruns of it, but I don't recall seeing a Goomba reverse direction like that instead of just plowing into Mario. Is that a game glitch that you intended to show off with your recorded keyboard inputs? I haven't played in a long time, so I also wouldn't be surprised to hear that such behavior is common. I didn't find an obvious reference to it in the TAS info here [0].

Edit: there is precedent for that Goomba behavior [1].

[0] https://tasvideos.org/GameResources/NES/SuperMarioBros

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/Mario/comments/add1fx/changing_goom...
It was enough control for a judge to outright bar a number of government agencies and people from communicating with any social media company on moderation matters, and then another judge to uphold that bar.
All we are demonstrating here is why Sha256 is 256 bits and not 32 bits. We have trivially identified collisions for the first 28 bits of the output, which is only 11% of the entire hash size.

Difficulty of collisions roughly doubles for each additional bit. Imagine we had a SHA32, that would be 16 times harder to achieve a collision. SHA256 is 43 with 67 zeroes behind it more difficult than the examples here.
That sounds like depression.
Let's say you have an 8 core physical machine with containers on it that have 16 cores assigned to them in total (they share the cores). You'd like for htop and other tools to reflect a situation similar to a physical machine inside the container with all CPU stats disregarding other containers, even though the physical machine has 8 cores and other loads running on it.
TCP has a lot of rules nailed down in numerous RFCs - everything from how to handle sequence numbers, the 3-way handshake, congestion control, and much more.

That translates into a whole lot of code that needs to run, while unix sockets are not that much more than a kernel buffer and code to copy data back and forth in that buffer - which doesn't need a lot of code to make happen.
Yes, but look at the data. The algorithm was buggy because the input data is a nightmare. If the data didn't look like that, it's very unlikely the bug(s) would have ever existed.
For the most part (although there are important exceptions), IFR flights are always in radar contact with a controller. The flight plan is tool allows ATC and the plane to agree a route so that they don't have to be constantly communicating. ATC 'clears' a plane to continue on the route to a given limit, and expects the plane to continue on the plan until that limit unless they give any future instructions.

In this regard UK ATC can choose to do anything they like with a plane when it comes under their control - if they don't consider the flight plan to be valid or safe they can just instruct the plane to hold/divert/land etc.

I'm not sure the NATS system that failed has the ability to reject a given flight plan back upstream.
Diversity does make a diff but it depends on the problem. Its sort of the Explore-Exploit trade off.

For Explore type problems diversity has a much bigger impact then Exploit type problems. To add to the drama/misunderstandings/confusion sometimes you assemble a team for explore and they do find the gold mine, but then they arent suited to exploit it cuz its in their nature to explore. And vice versa.
Of course, regulators (e.g., in the EU) could say no to some of these trends.
Speculative decoding have higher batch size.
The gravity question is one I've pondered myself as a thought exercise. There's been discussions on how far up a plant can draw water as the defining limit to how tall a tree could grow. Some discussions as well on how tall an animal could grow based on how high blood could be pumped up. Which is a direction different from the structural support and sizes that I find interesting.
If a developer writes their own Stable Diffusion variant from scratch, uses nothing more supportive than Numpy and writes all the supporting code themself, scrapes the web for data themself, trains image generating models on their own hardware, and then uses their own self created tool/system to generate AI, should that be copyrightable? In this case, everything short of Numpy would be the hand written code logic of that one developer (or small team). The data used to train the system could be argued is no different than a person viewing the world they live within... copyrightable?
I don’t quite understand what you are saying. In his scenario, what details would make it not copyrightable? If the network is paramount to the creation does that make it more or less copyrightable?
Peivacy has been used as a distraction to distract from the main issue which is indeed the copyright of user's data. The internet is unique in history with laws like art 230 , which allow certain companies to coopt other people's work without paying for it on a mass scale.
> it allows for multiple levels of isolation

Yes! Chrome has a visually similar functionality to Firefox Containers hidden away behind a feature flag [1] at the moment. BUT under the hood it's simply just tab grouping with no isolation. I presume isolation is against Google's interests so we will never see this kind of feature.

As for Firefox's API, the Contextual Identities API [2] that allows you to create/delete containers is amazing and easy to work with as a dev. And it works out-of-the-box, it doesn't need the companion addon Multi-Account Containers (MAC) [3] which really should've been part of Firefox in my opinion.

1. chrome://flags/#tab-groups-save

2. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/Web...

3. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account...
LLMs (large language models) running locally in privacy are the next killer app. Mac Studio can already run 180b models that compete with Gpt-3.5, 2-3 more generations and MacBook airs will be able to run locally. Apple is already deploying smaller LLMs to macOS. This will drive the next hardware cycle
Yikes! You can't post like this to HN and we ban accounts that do.

I don't want to ban you because your account has been around for a while—but when I look through your history I see so many comments breaking the site guidelines (and often quite badly) that I don't think we have much of a choice. However, we also haven't warned you before, so I suppose it would be fair to start with that.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules from now on, we'd be grateful. That means no more personal attacks, putdowns, name-calling, or flamebait—at a minimum. We want thoughtful, substantive, curious conversation. I did see at least one comment on the good side: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37235139, which is a nice proof that you can do this. Please stick to this from now on!
Scientists decipher the fingertip's 'memory'
This is myopically true while ignoring the large amount of influence coming from the business world itself, which inevitably just creates a partisan flamewar. Tying all the badness up in a tidy bag labeled "government" is just another method of control.
A curated list of free courses and certifications
Huh?

AFAIK, e-sims can be arbitrarily created and assigned to a phone, there isn't some hardware limitation like soldered ram. I can got to a new country and get an e-sim without having to hunt down a kiosk.

On my last extended trip to the US, I just signed up for a prep-pay monthly account with Visible and was able to get going pretty easily without having to fiddle with any actual hardware. The current generation of iPhone supports 8 e-sims. It all seems pretty good to me
>I have doubts about the survival of retirement as an institution.

>I could certainly see a kind of semi-retirement where a person dips out of high-pressure work in favor of lower pressure intellectual work that can be completed on a looser time frame. A lifetime of experience could probably be leveraged to provide valuable insight or work on high-value niche problems in specific domains, and that can be fairly lucrative and is often very amenable to remote part-time employment.

This is how most old folks lived for all but the last 100 years. I'd totally be down to work 1-2d / wk if the labor market allowed it, but most jobs are 40h / wk or more with very little in the way of part time flexibility. We're going to have to change to allow this sort of work again in the future.
That's brilliant! https://github.com/scientific-python/pytest-doctestplus seems to be similar working in the opposite direction, using the documentation source as the single location for test code. I like your approach better and wish there was more support for that pattern more generally!
I mean, it sounds shitty, but if they own the rights then it seems obvious that they can.
T1 time slots are 8-bits, samples are sent individually, with no packetization delay. There may be some delay between sampling and the time slot, and in a buffer when calls are connected between T1s and the time slots don't need to be matched up.

If you were calling into an x2/kflex/v.90/v.92 modem bank, that was hosted on a T1 (or larger), and v.92 could get 33.6 up, 56k (or so) down. It should be possible to recreate that with VoIP, but I don't know that anyone is that dedicated... anyway for end user modem to end user modem, 33.6 is the limit.
That's very interesting, and not an explanation I've heard before.
You never had to before, this could lead to the end of the current copyright law. Will wait and see what Disney thinks of this.
This is just another website that monetizes freely available information.
the other has six adjacent to five

Take another look, there's actually six pips on both sides.
I've worked on a project that required a bigger swiotlb as well, I don't remember the exact details though. I guess it's not that uncommon, but indeed the default value looks good.
So where are the biggest GPU crypto-miners, and have they turned their GPU's away from crypto to training models?

Because when that happens, I can only assume that time-travel is about to be invented. It just makes sense that someone from the future went back in time and created a crypto craze to rival tulip mania, but to ensure that their operation could finance enough GPU's to eventually invent time travel.
Is it possible to get 10 random articles and show the "best" 2? It would be difficult to define best, perhaps:

* length > something

* editions > something

* number of translations > something

I don't expect the long articles to be better, but I expect short articles to be about uninteresting topics. Also, old articles would get a lot of silly editions, so perhaps the criteria should include age.
As someone who has been doing a lot of work in SD, I just wanted to strongly second this.

Stable Diffusion and the like are much closer to when photoshop first appeared than they are to than the completely automatic art generation machine people make them out to be.

I remember well both digital cameras and photoshop receiving initial criticism from "real" artists... until they were both widely adopted by these communities.

The critique of digital photography was that it's not really art because you can just take a bajillion pictures and then filter out the ones that don't look good. Photoshop users (especially web comic creators) got similar flack that it didn't take real artistic skill to make nice images in photoshop.

For anyone young enough to always have photoshop and digital photography will likely be surprised that there was such resistance and snobbery around using these tools. There was also the same fear that these tools would ruin art by making "real" artists obsolete.
As always, I see a lot of outright misinformation, a lot of information taken out of context, and mostly - as is usual on HN - "Why they do X, if Y is better?" "Well, read the legislation, they actually do Z and they had reasons."

I wonder how would George of Poděbrady (who thought of something like EU in 15th century: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_of_Pod%C4%9Bbrady#Messa...). I don't think he would be worried about bureaucracy, I'm sure he would be in awe we can actually solve things this way.
It also wards off vampires. Which cause fatigue.

Of course I'm joking, but also wondering if there isn't a fragmented memory of a folk remedy buried in that bit of lore, alongside the "people with <disease> hated the smell" explanations.
You're kidding, right? Nintendo Switch has sold about 130 million units, over 6 years. Apple ships about 60 million iPads per year, for all use cases, but from 2017-2019 it was hovering around 45 million. 2018 was a really bad year at about 33 million.

So, we're currently at about 283 million iPads sold since the Switch launch, missing 2023 - so maybe more like 310-320 million, for all uses cases which go far beyond gaming. 130 million Nintendo Switches. Pretty reasonable to say they are pretty even.

Except, of course, they aren't even in the high-quality, paid games market where the revenue on iOS is a joke. How many games does iOS have that are paid, don't have IAPs, timers, or Loot Boxes? How many support local multiplayer on the same device? Switch has got hundreds, if not thousands; iOS has... name five.
The photo slide show of someone's vacation was a stock scene in comedies. But have you never sat down with family and went through old photos? Having conversations about where was that? who was this? who was this as a baby? Its a very different and much more personal experience than flipping through facebook.
To add to the other comments, when the nature of the job or the work environment is dysfunctional/dystopian it's easier to get people to be a little more productive when they are in the office.
There's quite a few fossils showing single-celled organisms from 3+ billion years ago. I imagine if more complex life existed the fossils could've survived
Same here - I just moved my project domains from Gandi to NearlyFreeSpeech after a decade or so. All of the reasons I chose Gandi originally have disappeared and they keep raising prices while cutting features. Sad times, I really liked them.
It doesn't have protection because the law did not protect it, and indeed the law protects the big tech, up until today.

It's not incoherent
Rather than tax us, just print the money to pay the medical providers.

Failing that, nationalize the "healthcare" industry.
Presumably, someone who accepted an in-office job either prefers that situation [1] or can’t find another employer offering a better situation (which also seems likely when you look at OP’s article, only 10% of employees plan to avoid an in-office requirement).

The mere fact that they accepted the job in the first place protects the employer from WFH rebellion.

[1] Based on this survey, I would say that a company offering an office environment but with the added flexibility of some work from home days aligns with the preferences the majority of US employees: https://www.randstadusa.com/business/business-insights/news/...
Yes, that's the library! It's something I've been slow cooking for over 10 years at this point. :)
Subscriber reply spamming on X is the new SEO
Complete Guide on How to install LLaMA: 8-bit and 4-bit
"I don't really know, but it hardly seems like good practise to pick up a bullet"

Of course it's not but that was no ordinary crime scene. There were thousands of people about, what would happen to the vehicle etc., etc? There's no way the crime scene could be secured in such a short time. And JFK had to be rushed to hospital. Nothing was certain.

He saw the bullet as evidence and on the spur of the moment secured it. After that he was likely in shock and thus his actions were more that of an automaton.
Vala offers async/yield and compiles down to native code (after being transpiled to C): https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Vala/Tutorial#Asynchronous_M...

More info: https://vala.dev/
This sounds like a problem with the networks, not a problem with the e-sim technology.
You can wrap tqdm around the "permutations(TOKENS, k)" if you want to measure progress. I haven't spent time trying to make this particularly optimised, for example that dict lookup is likely avoidable with a little bit of work via index lookup, and maybe cheaper. I've also not attempted to parallelise it, which would be fairly easy to do.

#!/usr/bin/env python

import string
import hashlib
from itertools import permutations

WORD_DIGIT = {
"one":1,
"two":2,
"three":3,
"four":4,
"five":5,
"six":6,
"seven":7,
"eight":8,
"nine":9}
TOKENS = [
"one",
"two",
"three",
"four",
"five",
"six",
"seven",
"eight",
"nine",
] + list(string.ascii_lowercase)

SEPARATOR = ", "

STARTING_TEXT = "The SHA256 for this sentence begins with: "

for k in range(2, 6):
for perm in permutations(TOKENS, k):
sha_start = ""
for char in perm:
if char in WORD_DIGIT:
sha_start += str(WORD_DIGIT[char])
else:
sha_start += char
test_string = STARTING_TEXT + SEPARATOR.join(perm[:-1]) + ", and " + ''.join(perm[-1:]) + "\n"
checksum = hashlib.new("sha256")
checksum.update(test_string.encode())
if checksum.hexdigest().startswith(sha_start):
print(test_string)
Fun fact - the NSA oui prefix is 00:20:91
Unfortunately, no. The typical interaction was the CSR requesting that I waste a bunch of time logging into the router, verifying a bunch of settings and requesting that I reboot the thing before continuing to troubleshoot my problem. They'd never take my word for it that I had already verified things before calling in so it was a complete waste of my time.

By changing the MAC address of my router, the CSR would generally pause in the middle of their script and ask me what brand router I had. I would tell them I wasn't sure but it was a really big box and said IBM on the side and then they'd give up and continue to the next phase of troubleshooting.

I'm a terrible person.
> Data privacy is one of the least important issues of our day

To you. To others, it's one of the most important.

> but are unable to produce specific harms Google and Meta ad tracking creates.

I think that some harms have been articulated repeatedly. And I would argue that just being under constant surveillance is, itself, a harm.

But, really, this is irrelevant in terms of the principle involved. Even if it were 100% harmless, that doesn't mean anything at all in terms of the fact that we should all have the ability to live our lives without having someone constantly spying on us. Human rights don't stop being rights in the absence of particularlized, articulable harms.
Might be interesting to see if WaPo posts an article that slants in favor of the bill now that Musk is against it. That article was quite neutral, IMO.
More developers tends to make duplicated code more likely, not less, as people tend to work on percentage wise smaller subsets of the whole and fewer developers will have a semblance of an overview of the whole. Sometimes also even makes duplication sensible for a while if it allows shortcircuiting communications paths.

The vast majority of kernel code is drivers. That's another reason why the Linux kernel code would be far bigger even if optimal. But it's also why it won't be optimal - the effort to figure out all the shared elements of every device out there is 1) not worth it, 2) going to take someone a lot of time to actually figure out commonalities that may not always be obvious.

I've worked on a driver for the Linux kernel. We didn't even start to look at deduping it because the hardware in question would only ever have our device, and nobody else would have our device. But would there be duplication? Sure. The chip we used was common. For others it might be worth figuring out commonalities with other devices and eventually pare down the code. Or not.
"Temporary" is a relative term
> it’s based on last universal common ancestor estimates(LUCA) and supported by (lack of) fossil record.

I thought the Cambrian Explosion's fossil record was pretty sizeable - in fact, it's named after the place where the fossil layer was first discovered. I didn't know it was related to a common ancestor. Are you thinking of something else or am I missing something major?
Audible is $15/month and you get to choose one title.

I think you’re confusing audible today with audible of 20 years ago.