skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure that's true livestock are processed as well, but one of the benefits of going vegan is healthier eating. You can't even call impossible burgers healthier.

As far as taste, I'll admit that meat burgers are much more variable whereas impossible's are just one product. So it's more consistent compared to all the bad options you have for meat burgers.

But compared to a fresh unfrozen well-grilled burger there's absolutely no comparison. You are simply not making a serious argument to say impossible's taste better than that, to the point that I think you could be trolling.

At best you can say they aren't terrible, but again they're more expensive.

As far as beyond's go, they're even worse than the worst frozen burgers I can find.
I don’t think the data supports this assertion. I think the perception that this is true is likely due to news click bait designed to generate revenue based on fostering outrage. Here is an excerpt from USC public health article.

Overall, since late March 2020, between 80% and 90% of U.S. adults consis­tently have viewed wearing a mask or face covering as an effective way to stay safe from the coronavirus, according to the Understanding Coronavirus in America Tracking Survey, an ongoing nationally representative internet-based panel survey of more than 6,000 people aged 18 and older (see Data Source).

Similarly, about 90% reported wearing a mask in the previous seven days to keep safe from the virus, although there are significant differences by locale, age, gender, race, income, educa­tion, and other sociodemographic factors. Generally, people who live in rural areas, are younger, are male, are white, have lower incomes, and have less education are less likely to report wearing masks, the survey found (Figure 1).

Source article: https://healthpolicy.usc.edu/evidence-base/most-u-s-adults-w...
ah yes the just and even handed laws that prevent both the rich and the poor from sleeping under bridges.
No need to be calling names. There is no elitism or degree in journalism required to understand the point of the article, if one actually reads it.

The main problem here is that I made an error in judgement when I thought the bulk of the people here actually read past the first paragraph, the title or even the top rated comment before firing off their comments which may or may not be related to the gist of article at all. Especially on inflamed topics.

My bad.
Why do you feel that way? I see nothing that indicates that this person is clueless.
That's a tough spot to be in. I would probably use Next 13 with page routing. If say Remix gets more traction, switching shouldn't be too difficult. Same for Qwik which has a similar tsx/jsx syntax.
It's going to be interesting to see how this pans out. It looks like more people are getting annoyed with the direction Next.js is going.
You guys made me watch it tonight, for some reason I missed it when it came out and never watched it.

No regrets!
It was over-the-top, corny and very fun.

Teenage-me would have been totally infatuated with the glamorous hacker lifestyle!
Interesting take.

If somebody chiseled a tree stump into a recognizable likeness of your face, would you dismiss it as derivative? Your face has been done before, stumps are EVERYWHERE. Chisels and hammers are _LEGACY TECH_. Sometimes things are interesting because they're creative, not because they're on the bleeding edge of technical complexity.
Yes, good point! We did actually consider that but realized it would just mean a bit of compression on that field in database - which would have helped, but not fully solved the problem.
There are lots of low-end robot arms. I have a uArm, which is not very good, on my desk. Way too much slop. Repeatability maybe 2mm.
Possibly. Yet I never used PowerPoint.
A lot of hardware companies also just tend to just outsource a lot of software development to other third parties. Once the software is delivered, sometimes these third parties just move on/go under and the bugs in the software never get fixed.
> Indeed, homes are some of the most liquid form of wealth

"Liquid" means fast to sell without giving a deep discount. Homes are far less liquid than listed securities.
~$800 per rifle, for those that went looking through the page and couldn't find it.

If others know of reputable sources that are cheaper, please link!
Crows can solve puzzles that require a sequential series of steps. Would that imply they have sequential memory? I saw someone in the article comments mentioning this as well.
This one ironically works out

> What do you call a vacation where you go to the beach, but come back with sand in your shoes?

> A vacation where you go to the beach, but come back with sand in your shoes.
LiIon is 1MJ/kg? But yes, a wide margin.

I see I was confusing Wh/kg with MJ/kg. Zinc-air could reach 5. Still down there.
Why not look at all contributing factors?

People critical of immigration aren't necessarily critical of the immigrants themselves but they are critical about the level of immigration during a housing shortage.

I believe governments don't want to address this because of the ugly truth it would expose.

At the heart of the issue is sky high deficits and an ageing population putting pressure on federal budgets and the easiest way to grow the budget is to continually increase the tax base.

The local population doesn't wan't to or can't afford to have children and it's more beneficial for the government to import full grown adults who will contribute towards GDP immediately. All costs from doing this (i.e not just financial costs) are passed onto the citizens. Those with assets actually pay the least in this system since they financially benefit from increased increased rents, suppressed wages and larger target markets.

This is not a phenomenon unique to Canada. It is common problem in developed nations.
A large part of the 2008 housing crash in the US was driven by HELOCs where the borrower ended up not being able to repay or refinance. Such loans can be a good way to access the value of the home, but only at the expense of reduced consumption while paying the loan off or reduced payout when it finally selling.
Luckily many websites won’t need to, since I’m sure Cloudflare will offer disabling Google topics as a sign you’re a bot. (I say this after getting stuck on a Cloudflare “are you a bot?” loop that I couldn’t get out of and that prevented me from getting to my site.)

Of course, the actual bots will just enable topics and fill it with random data, and only the privacy conscious will be negatively affected.
Two big points I see is 1) that normal people are not models, 2) peoples looks will vary widely based on their country of origin.

So I could see this working better with normal people and more fields that are not focused on country (ethnicity, skin color, body type, etc.)
As an aside: Hardware as a service is annoying and feels horrible, but is probably the only way to achieve the long lifetimes we need for consumer goods in a world where reviews are unreliable and we need to stop wasting resources on planned obsolescence.
That site uses some wild assumptions about what constitutes household income.
Haha, I thought the same thing. That's a rich man's idea of what a cottage is.

From the look of it was once a terrace of individual cottages that have been knocked through into one dwelling.

I love le Carre's work, so I'd say he deserved it.
How many projects do browser detection and block everything that isn't Chrome? A tiny fraction of websites do that.

It's absolutely a concern, just as sites relying on WEI is a concern. But it seems unlikely that sites will intentionally choose to exclude a non-trivial portion of their visitors.

If you want to make it even less likely, though, this is a great time to switch to Firefox (for its independence, as a browser not based on the Chrome engine at all).
Even if that's true, what does it change? We can't just regulate fossil fuels away without alternative infrastructure and markets in place. If we shut down all the coal tomorrow (or even just the private jets), whichever government forces that through is going to get voted out ASAP if they're lucky, murdered in their sleep if they're not. The laws would never survive more than a few months.

I don't disagree that big fossil fuel companies and billionaires are evil. But their evil has the tacit (and often explicit) approval and support of millions, if not billions, of average individuals who value their own comforts and convenience more than our collective well-being. Sure, not everyone's like that, but enough are such that unpopular punitive climate programs don't really have a chance of surviving long enough to matter.

That's not a matter of blame accounting, just humans being humans, a much harder problem to solve...
Understanding Investment Strategies: Hedge Fund, PE, VC, and Asset Management
I think the last several years have clearly proven that SF's polarized politics are absolutely no good at solving any problems and quite good at creating countless new ones, so it would be ridiculous for the rest of the Bay Area to follow them.
"The argument assumes that given one state of human existence, it is possible to calculate a distinct next state. And then a state after that. That is, if we had a powerful enough computer to store the state of every single atom, and calculate their interactions, we could play through time in that existence."

Why are you assuming this to be true? Due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, it's impossible to perfectly know "one state of human existence". So the rest of the thought experiment seems moot.
If not the whole thing there are definitely aspects of Lost in Translation that connect if you’ve ever been in the situation where someone was translating you.
I was immediately reminded of this black mirror episode:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be_Right_Back
>> For a long time, one got told that the "correct" way to use julia was in a notebook. Outside of that, nobody wanted to hear your complaints.

> I have never seen anybody in the community say the correct way to use Julia is in a notebook.

patrick's comment is fully in the past tense for this part, and that was indeed a pretty common thing for a long while in the past. Especially pre-1.0, before Revise became mature and popular, an oft-recommended workflow was to use a notebook instead of an editor. Or it would come in the form of a reply to criticism about the slow startup or compilation latency - "the scientists who this language is made for use notebooks anyway, so it doesn't matter" was a common response, indirectly implying that that was the intended way to use the language.
Pretty much the only times I'll go into a Tim Hortons is when taking a break on a long drive. There's a lot of highway out there where Timmy Ho's will be your only option, especially at night, so it's not surprising to see the drop boxes. Proper rest stops have them too.
No, I do not know how it works. I suppose it is important? Or anymore important to know than other stuff?

Not want wanting to brag or anything, but there is SO MUCH stuff that I have no idea how it works.
>Who wants polarization and would be annoyed by bipartisanship?

I think this[0] is the right take, but I'm guessing you haven't read much in the way of political discourse on Twitter, Reddit and Facebook over the last decade or so? Nuance has been discarded and there's hardly any willingness to compromise on anything.

[0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37449692
So that means you only put down 118,000 CAD and you were leveraged up

Your family wealth didn't increase by 72,000 CAD/year it increased by 135,000 CAD/year

but I see, you paid it off. you didn't have to, the option was to just make the minimum payments and sell, could have used your big income for other things but now I'm just reminded why its not interesting to listen to boring (your words) mortgage holders.
There’s no confusion about it referring to a dwelling. The confusion is about the _type_ of dwelling.

To quote Wikipedia:

> In American English, "cottage" is one term for such holiday homes, although they may also be called a "cabin", "chalet", or even "camp".

In other words, calling a multi-million pound property a “cottage” would rankle an American ear.
Not only is IFS a separate division, it's almost a different company. The x86 group has to purchase foundry services IIRC.
Show HN: A website to find names and their meanings
About the show startup times, they have been worked massively in the latest version of Julia. Mainly in version 1.9, which is the first version of Julia that saves native compiled code. You can RAAF more about that in the released blog [1].

On garbage collection and real-time applications, there is this [2] talk where ASML (the manufacturer of photolithography machines for TSMC) uses Julia for it. Basically it preallocates all memory needed before hand and turns off the garbage collector.

On the same more about real-time, if your call stack is all type stable [3], the you can be sure that after the first call (and subsequent compilation), the JAOT compiler won't be triggered.

About static compilation, there are two different approaches
* PackageCompiler.jl [4], which is rally stable and used in production today. It has he downside of generating huge executables, but you can do work to trim them. There is still work to do on the size of them.
* StaticCompiler.jl [5], which is still in the experimental phase. But it is far from being completely brittle. It does puts several restrictions on the chide you can write and compile with it, basically turning Julia in a static type language. But it had been successfully used to compile linkable libraries and executables.

Some of the concerns you have about usability in your third paragraph have been worked on with the 1.9 and 1.10 (coming) releases. The LSP usage is better thanks to native code caching, maybe you can try it again (of you have time). The debugging experience I honestly think is top notch if you're using Debugger.jl+Revise.jl [6] [7], still I know there are some caveats in it. About stack traces, there is also a more of work done to make them better and more readable, you can read the with done in these PR's [8] [9] [10] [11, for state of Julia talk].

Still, I can understand that Julia might not be able (yet) to cover all the usecases or workflows of different people.

[1]: https://julialang.org/blog/2023/04/julia-1.9-highlights/#cac...
[2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EafTuyy7apY
[3]: https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/performance-tips/#Wr...
[4]: https://julialang.github.io/PackageCompiler.jl
[5]: https://github.com/tshort/StaticCompiler.jl
[6]: https://github.com/JuliaDebug/Debugger.jl
[7]: https://timholy.github.io/Revise.jl/stable/
[8]: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/49117
[9]: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/49959
[10]: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45069
[11]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D8oRtDJEeg&t=2487
> ...we generally agree that during public health crisises it is reasonable for the government to overstep bounds a little to reduce loss of life.

No, "we" don't agree in the slightest. In fact, in my view, a "crisis" is exactly when government boundaries are most important and need to be strictly enforced, not relaxed, in order to prevent significant abuse.
What is it with the obsession some progressives have with badmouthing potential allies? Is dunking on the outgroup really so much more important than accomplishing your political objectives?

- Earnest question from me, a YIMBY conservative
The problem can be solved in two different directions - accepting fewer immigrants or building more housing (perhaps both for some stretch of time to ensure that citizens can afford housing and build families).

Long-term though I don't see a way for the Anglosphere to thrive unless immigration increases, given low birth rates.
unfortunately, both blocking the API, or faking it, will be abused to track users, unless a significant number of users do it in the same way...
I hope there will be a window. And my wife knows my preference. I’d hate for her to have to face that decision without me.
come on... if you don't see anything it means you would need the same amount of work...

what's this ???

Let's presume this is a chatgpt troll.
Yes - the point is, by staying in your house you are now consuming more housing than you were before, even though it’s the same exact house.

The wealth is quite real - it just doesn’t feel that way since the experience of it doesn’t change
Eh. You can already detect ad blockers and the vast majority of sites don’t bother to do so. I’d be surprised if this was much different.
That’s the page I went to that led me to some 404s

I appreciate all of the info you have supplied.

I would very much like to buy a complete multicopter to which I can add payloads and program routes/waypoints and otherwise customize. Do you or anyone else reading this have good experience with any vendors of open source drones?
I imagine a browser extension could do that.
So arrest all the homeless then?
Since PHP 5.3 why would you want to use PHP instead of Java when you're effectively writing Poor Man's Java but without the benefits of the JVM?
Chrome is the new Internet Explorer, hell even Microsoft threw in behind it, they like spyware-ish telemetry, so why not. What is sad is more and more common websites simply don't work in Firefox anymore (chase.com), so it's literally back to the days of running in IE6 or nothing, but Chrome is now that pestilence.
Sounds like Android. Anything interesting has weird compatibility quirks.
Why is
> Why did the tomato turn red? Because it saw the salad dressing!

the most popular joke between jokes? Is this the epitome of all humor?
So there, another reason I'm liking Vivaldi more and more.
Nuclear microreactor company Oklo to go public via SPAC
Prediction Markets come to mind as an egregious example.
>complaining about immigrants. Perhaps it’s convenient to blame other people.

Leftist and their leftist policies invite as many immigrants as they possibly can to an area with limited housing. Then it's shockedpikachu.jpg when the reality of supply and demand occurs and they clutch their pearls and ask "what could we have done to stop this?!" When in reality land, conservatives are telling them "we told you so". So instead of taking ownership of their mistakes thus proving conservatives were right, they gaslight everyone into thinking anything even remotely pointing towards the influx of immigrants is an issue is racist, effectively shielding themselves from blame.

This tactic of blaming any opposition as "racist" has been insanely effective in the West for the past four or so decades. Reality is catching up, and people left and right are seeing through the BS.

No one hates the immigrants, who wouldn't leave a third world country for Canada? The blame is firmly on the leftist politicians in Canada that are speed running the housing crisis.
> What is it with the obsession some progressives have with badmouthing potential allies?

If your commitment to the cause evaporates because "a leftie was mean to you on the internet", what kind of commitment are you offering in the first place?
It is a form of racism to criticize someone for their beliefs as an "uncle tom" or to demand that all members of a group share the same opinions.
It's not usually that hard because the higher level the decision, the more impactful it is on performance and the less a compiler will be able to bail you out. That's why you should start optimizing from the highest level and work your way down until the performance is acceptable. Only once you're at the point of optimizing low-level decisions does profiling really start to make sense.

A silly example: it doesn't matter how much you optimize your bubble sort implementation, it'll lose out to the most naively written quicksort, which will lose out to keeping the data always sorted and inserting with binary search, which will lose out to finding out how to make the data inherently sorted, which will lose out to figuring out how to avoid the need for the data to be sorted in the first place. The fastest code is no code at all.
I think a better analogy than "fan versus air conditioning" would be "window air conditioning versus central air." Look-around is rarely critical functionality, and so whether it's window or central, you're staying cool. The difference is that with window air conditioning, you've got to install them in the appropriate rooms and then uninstall them. It's a bit more work, but it still gets the job done.

Usually look-around can be replaced with two regexes or by just using capture groups. Not always of course, and it depends on whether a regex is the interface to what you're using. This is why, for example, I caved and added optional PCRE2 support to ripgrep. Since the interface is a regex, you don't have the full flexibility that you would if you were using a regex from a programming language.
Might be a good idea for a website. Collect real estate photos of house where famous people worked. Perhaps side by side with any photos of them actually working there!
Not going to lie, if Nestle dragged an iceball into orbit and started landing pallets of this Cosmic Springs bottled water, I would absolutely buy two.
i did that with my kids, although it was all completely disassembled. we had stored our stuff at my parents place, and when my dad sent the boxes (each 10kg) he said he could not find one box. so he bought another from ebay to make up the difference. then he found the lost box. my kids got more lego than i ever had. and they still wanted new stuff...
I disagree with the GP's predictable refrain that conservatism is naturally more financially 'smart', but I also find your characterization of conservatism a little bizarre.

More to the point, it's ironic that both GP and yourself are making partisan stabs when the article's main point is that the success of this movement might stem from its marked nonpartisanship.
That's what I was thinking. Like the BBC archives. Who really cares if it takes 6 months to unarchive an entire decade of TV history?
yup, I got most of those side effects causing me to give up on Ozempic. I might have been willing to eat like an anorexic[1] if my BG dropped to normal range but it didn't.

[1] not making light of anorexia. I mindfully chose that description because that drug will induce disordered eating patterns. I still have days where I refuse to eat because to my BG level and suppress hunger then binge because the hunger is overwhelming.
Sort of. Picketty writes that it’s about the capital to labor replacement ratio. If you can replace labor with more capital (I.e. robots, automation, tools/equipment - etc), then wealth is going to tend to concentrate. With the speed of technological innovation today, this is largely the case.
> Unless you are programming directly in assembly, the most important take-home from the article is probably the "Bonus chatter" at the end: shifts equal to or greater than register size are undefined in C and C++.

The article claims UB only at greater but not at equal:

> Bonus chatter: The wide variety of behavior when shifting by more than the register size is one of the reasons why the C and C++ languages leave undefined what happens when you shift by more than the bit width of the shifted type.

If think your "equal to or greater" is correct, and the article is wrong. The reason might be that the instructions are defined up to including equal for many hardware.

I remember checking one case that included equal as valid for only one of left/right shift and invalid for the other (left/right encoded in 5 bit signed).