skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Wowwwww. I desperately want this approach to hold up but who in their right mind puts that in a paper with only the caveat “interestingly, only one dose worked.” when they tested three others with literally zero effect and there’s no known mechanistic reason listed.

I hope I’m missing something but that looks like a ridiculous blunder perhaps made to get forward to publishing.
Lifetime approved heat pump? They have a lifetime of 15 to 20 years.
Artificial Consciousness Remains Impossible (Part 3)
"Wir mussen wissen, wir werden wissen." - Hilbert
Late USSR had funding problems. Crashed due to having them. So governments have funding problems too.

You may also ask Argentine.
> What about Apple?

> I can't comment on the current state of MacOS since the time I've spent actually using a Mac during the last 8 years or so probably totals to a few hours. Apple used to be good at this, and I hear they still do a decent job at keeping things sane, even post-Jobs.

The macOS menu bar is still compulsory. First party apps generally still fill it out properly with commands for everything a user can do and put the common ones in their usual places. For third party apps it depends on whether the developer put time into platform norms. Many Electron apps don't: Slack makes many commands available only through UI popup menus; VS Code puts them in the command palette so you can only find them by search. Of course these apps have key shortcuts but you can't learn them from a menu bar item that doesn't exist.

The focused window gets a heavy shadow. I think that's also compulsory.

But first party apps and recently the system frameworks are guilty of cramming toolbars into title bars and leaving a drag area that doesn't span the width of the window. That's permanent. At least the window title is still written and you know you can drag that. A window's file proxy icon is often missing until you hover on the title. The bar at the top of the window may or may not be visually divided from the content area.

First party apps also remove color and/or silhouette distinctiveness from those toolbars' buttons. App icon silhouettes are also gone.

Scroll bars are of course hidden by default but can be always shown.

The result is probably more usable than what's described in this article on other platforms, but off peak for macOS.

Aside: iOS started the hidden-unless-scrolling scroll indicators trend, I think. Platform guidance was that you're supposed to flash them on first appearance of any scroll view whose content doesn't all fit. (To try it out, go to the Home Screen and then back to Safari.) This is the signal to the user that there is more to see. Users don't consciously think about it but they pick up the right expectation. You just call a method[1] after the view transition animation finishes. This has become arcane knowledge in the iOS field: No one remembers this is important to do in the absence of persistent scroll bars, and where it's not automatic due to using system frameworks in a high level way, many apps just don't get this right.

[1]: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiscrollview...
Less than 10% of the company self reported salary data over an unspecified time window, and a limited set of aggregate statistics are reported from this distribution. Certainly interesting information, but unfortunately I don’t think you can make honest inferences from these figures. Any comments or interpretations are little more than speculations and are basically deceitful.
What do you mean by "sabotaging" the Ukrainian effort ? He denied the Ukrainians Starlink extension into Crimea - which is Russian territory and Starlink does not service Russia anyways. Starlink's terms of use prohibit military use also and this would have been heavy use of Starlink explicitly in a military op.
This is only true if you literally crash the economy and do nothing else. What we can do is instead shift priorities, like food and housing security, while reducing the economy by not doing useless, pointless things. Do we really need all these things we buy at the store now?
It seems to me that the "alarmist" scientists have been erring on the side of caution so much that the events have been unfolding faster than even some of their most conservative predictions.
True, monopoly can more easily be satisfied with local optimization with a lock on profit while competition increases the possibility of overcoming local opt blockages.
"China, the United States and India — contribute 42.6% total emissions, while the bottom 100 countries only account for only 2.9%.". Asia is the largest emitter with China at 27%". While selling renewables to the rest of the world, China seems reluctant to reduce its reliance on coal-fired power stations.

'Global Energy Monitor and the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air finds the country quadrupled the amount of new coal power approvals in 2022 compared to 2021.'

Chinese scientists are hardly backward in understanding climate science. So what's the logic here? Presumably if they could maintain energy supplies without coal, they would.

https://ourworldindata.org/annual-co2-emissions
https://energyandcleanair.org/publication/china-permits-two-...
IIRC the story wasn't as told. Specifically while peace talks were possible the West reminded Ukraine before they began they needed to make clear that there were certain uncompromising demands.

In particular Russia had to leave Ukraine completely. Russia was not willing to put that on the table so peace talks sputtered out.

Note that this doesn't mean the West prevented peace talks. There would have been a lack of fighting for a month or two while the peace talks were going on, sure, but they wouldn't have gone anywhere.

Ukraine said from the moment the invasion slowed down at all they were only going to be willing to accept Russia leaving completely with no land left in their hands.

Russia in turn has always said they want a land bridge to the ocean at minimum.

Until one of those changed peace talks were futile.
Yes, it’s called C++20 Game Engine Developer.
The latter sounds like fantasy though, and it's not the lab-grown meat per se I'm talking about.

Also I wasn't talking about car usage exclusively during vacations, I was explicitly talking about private car usage.

People literally get governmental subsidies for building homes in the suburbs, then commute by car and pollute the planet in order to avoid car traffic.

Anyone who fails to see the absurdity of this has drank too much Kool-aid for my taste.
That's because the author apparently neglected to parse the resulting page to ensure that the submission succeeded.

If you terminate the system right after sending a form there is no guarantee that the data even left the local buffers for the network.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmFlOd0MGZg
> "We compensate Googlers based on what they do, not who they are," said Google spokesperson Tamani Jayasinghe in a statement.

Isn't this famously false, given that they pay large disparities depending on someone's country in which they work? This only holds true within a specific country.

Doesn't Google also try to dock your pay if you move out of a HCOL city, too?
There are species of ocean life that use the earth’s magnetic field to find oxygen after they are newly alive.

A small percentage go the wrong way for millennia and die immediately, but they pass along their generations gene when the magnetic field flips of the earth.

Always found that fascinating to consider…
Any chance I can chat with you about the role before applying over email or a call?
Are we discussing the building of them or operation of them?

Due to the complexity of nuclear plants, any issues encountered during building are likely to drastically effect the costs and time required, whereas coal plants are a more mature technology that we already have a lot of experience with. NB. I'm not claiming that coal plants are a better choice (they're not), but that there's less risks involved with the financing and manufacture of them.

If we're discussing the operation of already built plants, then I can't find any stats, though I'm sure there's been at least some explosions or fires in coal plants. I daresay that a coal plant explosion is a lot easier to deal with and resolve than a nuclear plant explosion considering the problems with toxic materials.
That's why variable length SLAAC has been proposed

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-6man-variable-...
this strategy goes down the drain for any profession that relies on being on one of the big cities to thrive. What do you suggest for those people?
An economy not worth investing in in my book. It’s always more clear to separate success and result. Sometimes, you’ll have no result, so there will be some parasitic (or truthy) value like null or true. And when you check success-named result deeper/further in code, it looks like you’re indexing into a boolean. Trying to make it clear on-site creates miniprotocols not worth remembering. Worst case scenario is {success:x, error:y}, x and y being 4 combinations of null and non-null, where you aren’t even sure what happened and may swallow a false positive with an optimistic check. Also, since undefined is not in json standard, the existence becomes ephemeral in languages where that’s distinct from just being undefined. You may think that returning undefined from a wrapped worker is okay, but it results in “error encountered: undefined” down the line due to {} payload. It’s one of the things that make programming harder for no good reason.
That rules quote does not apply in the slightest. Perhaps I was glib about it, but I replied directly to the message at hand. He questioned the validity of studying a (massive) historical event (it “changes nothing”, much like studying a lot of history). You continue the exact same line of reasoning (“isn’t going to change modern sociopolitics very much”, though I find the use of “very much” an interesting use of words in this case). That there is nothing to gain. You make two assumptions a) that if there was a second gunman that they couldn’t possibly be put to justice and b) there is no historical value to knowing the truth or understanding the truth that would come to light had a potential third actor that was tied. For example say the Soviet Union somehow was toed (I’m not saying they are) there is an incredible value to knowing that it is fact. And if the FBI was involved? You thinking the FBI reputation is tarnished now is opinion, the effect could even have legal repercussions to people still alive and to regulating agencies. You don’t know , but if you have some “war game” about the impact I would love to see it. But the biggest of all is understanding the history of our country and world history. Historians don’t pretend that knowing more about the military maneuvers of Alexander will effect us today even though his battles have been studied to death. But when we contradict that denial of understanding some truth of our own history we are told, “doesn’t matter”, there’s no modern sociopolitical gain.

Your opinion on JFK as a president is moot. The fact he could not continue being president is what changed the world. LBJ succeeded him and the rest is “history”.
It doesn’t need to play out in todays politics but as I said, why study history at all if the only point is to gain insight into how it effects us directly today??
The SSL cert on your website is probably expired (cloudflare is warning about it). I suggest you just use letsencrypt and auto renew with certbot, or whatever they use these days.
I'm not just talking about the grid. Consider airplanes. Figuring out either biofuel or carbon capture that 90% of flights need is a lot more difficult than making a car electric.
Because people have a right to a decent life. You can't demand Chinese and Indian and African people live without power and AC just because they can't afford state of the art power grids, while smugly living off of more than a hundred years of being ~the only CO2 emitters, on which we've built our way of life (and this includes not just the USA but the EEA and a few other rich countries as well - India especially has lower CO2 emissions per capita than any of the self-proclaimed "green" nations in Europe).

And note that the solution for reducing emissions in China and India is relatively simple: commit string-free resources and money to building renewable grids and nuclear instead of coal.
My understanding is that the mind body connection is accepted. Ie, if you have a chronic physical ailment it will affect your mental state.

What is more exciting for me is Daniel Kahneman explanation for why smart people do dumb things. He brings a more nuanced explanation than fear or flight. Essentially he argues our mind usually operates in autopilot System I thinking which is full of mental shortcuts and biases. Often people get trapped in a doom loop because they are so exhausted they cannot activate System II which will alter biases and behaviors. In other words, when people are chronically stressed and exhausted they keep doing the same thing and complain they are not getting better results.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=d953fegpMFE&si=d1LN17swtSO6WNtK
My money's on egg case... my Unsolved Mysteries obsessed inner child is on a relic from the Deep Ones
> What are my alternatives besides Office365?

Protonmail ? If its email you're after you can point your MX at them.
There's an 8-minute promo for the doc, which appears to be an ad for the book "Blood & Oil", amazon.com/Blood-Oil-Mohammed-Salmans-Ruthless/dp/B08H2JKTV9/
php-fpm & nginx -g "daemon off;"
18 minutes to 80% charge in the 800v cars.

Furthermore: for all the whining people do about "sitting around waiting for it to charge", those people conveniently leave out all the time they spend driving to/from and waiting at a gas station...whereas many EV owners just get home and take about 30 seconds to plug in.

So, for the tradeoff of having to wait ~20 minutes instead of 5 to fuel up on a long trip, you get to not spend ~5 minutes every week or two driving to a gas station and filling up.

Most Americans don't even drive enough per day to make it necessary to have level 2 in-home charging.
and that's the main issue with Canada, there's not enough houses being built. And no interest in doing so, apparently
To save someone a click, it's this sort of drivel with no citations:

> Furthermore, we have recently detected a number of alarming anomalies in all the layers of the Earth system. There is an extraordinary displacement and destabilization of the Earth’s core, a sporadic and chaotic acceleration of the planet’s rotation, and a shift in its rotational axis. This scenario is compounded by a critical weakening and emergence of atypical anomalies of the magnetic field, and a change in the composition of the upper layers of the atmosphere. These events have culminated in an extreme activation of magmatic foci, and an accompanying increase in deep mantle earthquakes - bringing about a decrease in the thermal conductivity of the ocean. As a consequential result, our oceans have lost their ability to function as a compensatory and cooling mechanism. All these alarming factors indicate only one thing - To Wit, Our planet is on the verge of self-destruction, and humanity has only a few years remaining to avert this impending catastrophe.
Paying for carbon capture is big problem since there is no profit and needs to be done collectively.

One option would be taxing energy. The carbon tax would be small by that time. That would also keep the price higher.

I had idea for retroactive carbon tax, making people pay for their past consumption. Those of us that are older got lots of benefit from polluting CO2, and makes sense to have us pay to remove it. The feasibility depends on the price, and how to charge lots of people who are retired.
I don't think the parent is arguing that financial transactions involving humans aren't bad, he's arguing that labeling the transaction as "misogynistic" regardless of which side receives the value doesn't make sense. It'd be like arguing that consumers paying for a widget is "anti-consumer" (seems reasonable enough) but at the same time consumers getting paid to take a widget is "anti-consumer" (wtf?) and finally if there's no value exchanged then it's magically hunky dory.
If I remember correctly a previous version of this article basically just copy/pasted the highest numbers they could, which meant that they focused on random typos. There was a running joke and a bunch of memes about some entry level engineer making 700k base, because I think it was very clear that they mistyped “178k” or “187k” as “718k”. For an L7 engineer bases go a bit higher but numbers that high, with that little equity, are unheard of. It’s highly likely nobody with an understanding of how compensation works looked through this table.
From the grammar, I would not assume GP is a native english speaker, much less monolingual.
Dora metrics from Google – Now with five metrics [pdf]
Who != where
I think you can frame it as a neutral tradeoff in the abstract, but Dark Souls is a monumental piece of cultural heritage and is clearly and unequivocally better than gacha games.
It’s like the Clear program at the airport, but for public restrooms.
I just wish we didn't go down so stupidly. I could understand mere greed. I could even understand ordinary ignorance.

Instead, we chose stupidity. The answers were right there. It wasn't a secret and it wasn't all that difficult. Instead people pretended it was a vast conspiracy against them, denying both basic physics and the data.

We still debate why and how Rome fell, but they'll look back at us and say, "yeah, they were just a bunch of dumbfucks."
Fyi: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diving_reflex

Sama-Bajau are specifically mentioned as having an enhanced reflex.
Otherwise known as "cd p<tab>."
Hackers' Conference (1984)
As described by an attendee, Robert Gaskins [0], who would later invent PowerPoint:

This meet-up was initiated by Kevin Kelly and Stewart Brand, and designed by Lee Felsenstein, Bill Budge, Andy Hertzfeld, and Doug Carlston, timed to coincide with the publication of Steven Levy’s book Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution.

Stewart Brand claimed that the invitees were “the most interesting and effective body of intellectuals since the framers of the U.S. Constitution,” a claim that escaped criticism from those attending. Invitees paid a flat $90 for the weekend, including conference, round-the-clock food and drink, and dormitory bunks. Steve Wozniak donated $5,000 for videotaping, and scraps of footage from the weekend later became a DVD [1]. The t-shirt design was by Don Knuth’s student Scott Kim [2].

[0] https://www.robertgaskins.com/

[1] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0009RS0EM/qid=1149603344/...

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20131031125056/http://scottkim.c...
It also completely ignores the fact that developing countries move exactly to what the Western world does.

Why do so many people eat insects or are pure vegetarian in India? Because many are simply too poor to afford meat. You know what's one of the first major things Indians change when their wealth increases? Adding more meat to their diets.
Just an idiom note: It's "intents and purposes" not "intensive purposes". Easy to mis-hear, but something you want to remember before it makes you look ill-educated in a work memo.
You probably are thinking of normal functions, and not partially applied ones (which are also just normal functions that we get a special way totally unrelated here). Also I don't think they can reproduce

Blammo! Our gnome is now packaging together incoming items into bundles of three, caching them in the interim while the bundle is not complete yet. But if we close the input prematurely, it will acknowledge and produce the incomplete bundle:

(>!! b 4)
(>!! b 5)
(close! b)
; Value: [4 5]
Europe may have many cars, but they are smaller and drive shorter distance.

Perhaps air travel is cheaper. But wages are lower meaning people need to work more hours before they can take a flight.
Texas has 100GW of solar, 50GW of batteries, and 20GW of wind in its interconnect queue. ERCOT is also working on standing up a capacity market after embarrassment after embarrassment, driven by the PUC. This should be solved within the next 1-3 years.

When the grid is strained due to AC loads, solar is pumping out full capacity (with a de minimis performance decrease at utility scale if the temp is exceptionally high). Lots of questions about how much of their fossil gas infra will be stranded as batteries rapidly decline in cost (battery firmed renewables directly compete with fossil gas).
Lying under oath is a crime; it should be harshly punished when carried out as part of a conspiracy of supposedly trustworthy officials.
Moved all my domain registration to cloudflare
Indeed the word border is in there.
I wrote that word, followed by a few others that point out what other commenters jumped in with: confusion between border and inherent rights to move.

I think you should read again.
I feel like maybe some Western leaders have done a bit of this, and their conclusion has been "Let's let the poorer few billion of the world die rather than fuck up our own electorates' lives.". Obviously with a bit of twist and turns like "My hands are tied, I don't want to crash my economy by being super radical (so I'll adjust things a little here and there like asking car manufacturers to promise to be neutral by 2035), but external effects like death and destruction in poorer countries? Well... that's their own shit to deal with."
One of the options is just injecting CO2 into very deep caves/water. And it will then react with many rocks all by itself!

The company that Microsoft is buying capture from is using lots of energy to remove CO2 from rocks, but that's because they're working to pull more CO2 from normal air. When you have an exhaust pipe it's already concentrated and you can separate it out much more easily.
I did not opine on SBF. I was specifically responding to the veracity of this claim, as quoted in my original post:

>I think when you go to prison, in addition to giving up your freedom of movement, you give up your dietary preferences.

To which the response was to show that some people do not have to give up some dietary preferences, due to their tribal affiliations. For example:

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-03-19-me-36098-...

As for:

>And if you are worried about your dietary needs not being met in prison, then don't do shit that lands you in prison?

Innocent people also end up in prison.