skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I guess I got caught in the narrative. I still remember Spike Lee's movie Chiraq.
from 2003-2012. During that nine-year period, 4,265 citizens were killed in Chicago, which is nearly the number of U.S. soldiers who were killed in Iraq.
The idea you have as much risk being shot as an American citizen in the war zone of Iraq as you would walking the streets of the south side of Chicago.

The risk of a man 18 to 29 years old dying in a shooting in the most violent ZIP code in Chicago — 60624, a swath of the West Side that includes Garfield Park — was higher than the death rate for U.S. soldiers in the Afghanistan war or for soldiers in an Army combat brigade that fought in Iraq, according to a study in the medical journal JAMA Network Open. Among men 18 to 29, the annual rate of firearm homicides in that ZIP code was 1,277 per 100,000 people in 2021 and 2022, the study found, compared with an annual death rate for U.S. troops in a heavily engaged combat brigade in Iraq of 675 per 100,000. The most violent ZIP codes in Philadelphia surpassed the risk of combat death by military service members, too, but the death rate there was lower than in Chicago, the study found. New York and Los Angeles didn’t have any areas that were so deadly.
> People willing to openly state their bigotry towards people I consider my peers disqualify themselves from my respect.

That is to say, people with whom you disagree.
Oh no. That "technically feasible" translates to "when the government will be able to pass the practical parts of this legislation without too many people asking too many questions".
Are you quite near to where he was in 2014? He said in the article that he lived (at time of writing) in a pretty conservative area:

> I live in a Republican congressional district in a state with a Republican governor. The conservatives are definitely out there. They drive on the same roads as I do, live in the same neighborhoods. But they might as well be made of dark matter. I never meet them.

I agree with OP that it's much more likely that he did meet them, just in contexts where it doesn't come up.
Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37403089
I think you should go back and re-read the post I initially replied to.
e/acc?

EA?
B is super important to me, so my phone right now is a OnePlus 7 Pro. It was one of the last models ever made that can still pass SafetyNet while rooted (due to being whitelisted for "basic" / non-hardware-backed attestation). Unfortunately now it's several versions out of date and will stay that way for the foreseeable future, on top of the fact that nobody's figured out how to lock the bootloader on a custom ROM, despite the fact that it'll get you back Widevine L1 keys (the 7 Pro doesn't erase them on bootloader unlock like most phones do).

But this all stopped mattering to me when something accidentally activated a "feature"[0] of TWRP that erased my device and the maintainers have so far been completely hostile to the notion of adding an option to disable that functionality. ADHD now permanently bars me from any form of tweaking because the risk of TWRP suddenly erasing my device one day cannot be mitigated whatsoever. Even making backups from TWRP is off-limits because I'm afraid of it erasing my device instead.

Now I just use my phone because OxygenOS is great, the hardware mute switch is great, lack of camera cutout is great (fuck rounded corners though), and it has some serious flagship specs. Not an advertisement or anything, but this was $300 refurbished from Back Market.

[0]: https://github.com/TeamWin/Team-Win-Recovery-Project/issues/...
Yes this is what I meant.
Thank you for the clarification as some people might not be aware of those United States of America federal laws.

For example the CLOUD act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act
talk about solid-state storage
Same for tutanota and ig.
> could it be that anti skilled influencers are targeting a different business model

Yes, they're entertainment. Some people invest in the market for long-term returns. Same savvily trade short-term effects. Others are there to gamble, and their gains are first and foremost hedonistic. If you're playing the game to play, anyway, why not have a sassy MC? (To be clear, I have nothing against gambling. I do have a problem with promoters who muddy the line between it and investing by repeating conspiracy theories.)
If you're in Europe, just get one of those pre-paid free SIM cards (you don't even have to top up nor activate the card using KYC). You simply have to text a number they give you and you will get an active phone no for 14 days.

I've used this countless times to activate google products and other such privacy invading services.
Fair.

I agree that tolerance of intolerance is bad, but you and I disagree a bit on moral relativism. Anyway, sorry for not reading the entire article.
Well I went to the trouble of registering after clicking Discover only to find that there is no search function, no way of filtering other than a predefined set of "hash tags".
That's not a bunch of separate caveats, it's a few principles illustrated with lots of examples.

- Don't use effects for things that aren't genuinely effectful

- Put finnicky state management stuff in reusable utils instead of re-implementing it from primitives over and over again.

Neither is React-specific.
Again, the fuel is cheap only because they aren't being charged for the externalities (e.g. CO2e) that the fuel produces.
Reading further, use client is viral, and propagates to children components.
One-time pad isn't a password. It is a flash drive or hard drive full of random bits.
I'll do what I did the last time one of these articles popped up. Word counts:

complex: 2

confusing: 3
What a deeply unnerving thread..
Doing some armchair navel gazing cryptanalysis, but isn't that only true if you assume the OTP has access to true randomness? What if the attacker breaks your CSPRNG? Or what if the universe is deterministic and therefore a true RNG is impossible?
It’s interesting that one of the rules and purported virtues of this dinner format is confidentiality. Anytime people who hold power meet, especially political positions but also even other economic power, there is vociferous demand these days for transparency about what is discussed at meetings. Think of the decades now of criticism of events like Bohemian Grove in the USA, or politicians’ sauna circles in Finland.
There's an entire section in TFA before the quote that explains why it's relevant (it's not what you are assuming here).
ChatGPT wasn't surpassed by competitors in less than 6 months, what model would you say beat it that early?
Not really. Maps are also mere data, but they are quite successfully copyrightable. There's even a concept of trap streets [0] used to find out if someone used your data in their map without permission.

AI models don't have an established legal framework yet, but it's reasonable to assume that similar rules will apply here.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street
How are those things logically comparable? Or is that your point, that it's all rooted in morality?
The Guardian describing how unions bankrupted a local authority, so that (potentially, if it was like the private sector) all workers will lose their jobs. Priceless.
Is It Too Early to Leverage AI for WebAssembly?
Mine went on forever and I gave up. Am I missing something? (I'm on a mobile)
> No, CVE is not a vulnerability database

"No, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures is not a vulnerability database."

Yeah, IDK where anyone got that idea.
Well, it's a disappointing and shallow read, because the topic of the usefulness of combining Cyc and Alpha would have been interesting.
Absolutely.

Automotive grade controls are pretty expensive (it's not unreasonable to expect them to be operative from -40 to 140f, UV resistant, dust and vibration resistant, etc.), and as with all hardware, BOM cost is king. Even if the button can be stolen from an existing design, it still costs real money, and adds manufacturing labor costs.

The button then has to be tested, and kept in stock for service purposes. What if the button has silkscreen printing on it? It might be the same hardware button for the traction control and the trunk open button, but now they are different SKUs because the label is different.

So let's say I can eliminate 10 $1 buttons (that is an extraordinarily cheap button) by moving functionality to a touchscreen that is going to be in the car no matter what. I reduce the BOM cost by $10 per unit. That's a bunch of buttons that also aren't going to have warranty issues either. The wiring can all go straight to the head unit in a single bundle as well, and there are ten less connections for the assembly line to make. If I do that on a popular platform like the Corolla selling 750k units per year, I have just reduced expenses directly by 7.5 million, plus the cost of install, and simplified the supply chain.
> Senatorial dynasty

It's only a dynasty if it includes multiple people. His son is a senator. He never was.

> near presidency

Which race was that? In 1988, he got a full 400,000 votes. In 2008 he got 3% of the vote in the primary, in an election Republicans were almost certainly going to lose no matter who they nominated. In 2012, he got 10%.
Or, inference that can fluidly use available CPUs, GPUs, and neural units on M1/M2/M3.
> clear problems when the original implementation is stretched in ways that weren't anticipated -- which is a common argument in favor of testing.

On this point in particular, I'm not sure of this is happens very often in data engineering (especially with data transforms), since I don't think tables experience the type of scope creep the way app components or APIs might. Once a table is shipped, almost all every subsequent change is either adding/removing columns (which I think should be written in a way that means it's impossible to change the grain), fixing bugs (in which case tests are not relevant), or internally refactoring for performance (tests can help, but usually only cover very basic issues).

The latter case is actually one where I think automated, generic testing would be helpful, but I'm not aware of any existing tools make easy? Ideally, I would want a test suite to run new and old versions of the code in parallel, and confirm that outputs are unchanged.
The PinePhone guys must be marketing geniuses then to sell a true open source device for 150 USD.
Also, it would make sense that they would be more likely to be paid for promoting poorer performing stock rather than what would be able to sell itself on its own merits.
Allocated storage should come directly from the consuming team's budget. Divvy up the total storage cost and allocate in proportion to requested limits.
Dan Abramov (React core team, formerly of Meta) talks about this in a Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/dan_abramov/status/1654688751342301184

In short, it's because Vercel invested engineer-years into piloting RSCs as part of a production framework and making Next the guinea pig. Next wasn't actually the first framework to try RSCs - Hydrogen (Shopify) and Gatsby both tried early versions of it and provided feedback, but Next is the first to implement it to the point that it can be considered stable.

The long-term goal is that RSCs aren't a Next-only concept - for example the Remix team said that they wouldn't implement them until they became more stable (https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1678416472010260480), but are working on it now (https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1697253955376722092). But the React team has always historically favoured trying new features in production to iterate on the API (this happened a lot internally at Meta), and this was an opportunity to do that.
There is a conspiracy theory that Jim Cramer trades against his own advice.
The term of art is 'bona fide occupational qualification', or BFOQ for short: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bona_fide_occupational_qualifi...
If you are the owner of the site may I make a single recommendation. In the domain field set the casing to all lowercase. Depending on the device fields like that want to start with a capital letter, thus changing the output password.
Tell that to TeamViewer, who requires you to install Edge in order to use their product
Show HN: driver – a TypeScript pkg for declaring finite states via boolean logic
I think the point being made is that there is a limit to tolerance and what might be called multicultural or post modernism. I took the original comments point to be: all humans deserve respect intrinsically, but evil does exist and should not be tolerated. Yes, evil doers think they’re good. Is there a way to objectively judge this? No. This is the classical liberal dilemma re military action.

Let’s be tolerant of everyone except those who belong to groups explicitly making the world worse. Is that a subjective measure? Yes. Does that mean we shouldn’t, to use a modern phrase, “punch Nazis”? No, punch away.

Everyone has the moral authority and responsibility to act to reduce suffering.
The Enigma is probably the best biography I've read, though that's specific to Turing
I told you a while ago that llama.cpp supports 4/8-bit (and other) quantization just fine (and fast) on x86_64.
the CLOUD act: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act

I'm a Apple fanboy myself and praise their security features. But as a USA company they are not above the law.
37signals Introduces "Once" - Buy software one time
The problem you're having is that you're unable to view purchasing a diamond in non-economic terms. It isn't "absurd" or "non-advanced," nor are people "duped" into making "supremely poor financial decisions." People aren't as dumb as you think, they know that a rock doesn't really represent anything, but they enjoy giving and receiving diamonds, and pretending that they do symbolize a commitment, and sharing that belief with friends and family.

You think my previous comment is "devoid of reason" because it's about ritual and symbolic gestures, not about economics, concepts you either cannot comprehend or choose not to. Which is fine -- most atheists believe they are wiser than believers, for example -- but no amount of rationality or logic is going to change people's minds.
Yeah I was trying to figure out what that was all about. It seems it's like a desk drawer? I can only assume it's to preserve the silhouette when the trunk is opened, can't think of any practical advantages
Point of contact: john@spaceda.space
The standard "whole milk" in the US and EU are both 3.5% milkfat. If your whole milk is less than 3.5% in the US, report them to the USDA.
I definitely agree with the primary point, "building a chip that meets specfic requirements we got from the customer" is not easy and is what matters.

However, RISCV cores abound. In pretty much any HDL known to man with varying design trade-offs and capabilities. It's extremely difficult to differentiate at the RTL level at this time. Not impossible, but it would be a significant investment, which is I guess SiFive's business model. Sell IP at prices cheaper than that.

Here is a high quality, well documented, SystemVerilog version intended for embedded applications that I know has been included in multiple ASIC and FPGA designs successfully.

https://github.com/lowRISC/ibex
The issue would be that you wouldn't have a nice problem to think about on the puzzle stack exchange. :)
Every security lab I’ve ever been around was picking lots of low hanging fruit from the fertile tree of that infotainment system.
Curiously I don't want to shell money on a secondary phone number when I think or believe the other party shouldn't ask for it. I'd also have to maintain it battery and credit wise.

I know I should though if I want to use ig and others free of mind.
I think that's because its a hardware product.

They want you on their games marketplace, and they don't want you to return the product/make a consumer complaint. Plus there aren't any bots to worry about when the cost of entry is a few hundred $.
I feel like there is a lot missing from this writeup, but I can't put my finger on exactly what.

Also it feels strange that Government doesn't have its own signing key and they just use the same as everyone else. Which they didn't address and apparently do not intend to change.
I tried to read several sections of this garbage post (it goes wrong right from the get-go. There are no "virtue points". There is human decency). Social justice really broke all your brains, didn't it. The amount of dense hyperlogical-yet-completely-uninformed handwringing over people simply trying to note and correct for harm against the less powerful. how dare they.
How banal can a software mistake be before we aren't allowed to besmirch the name of the devs involved? Is forgetting a test case a shameable offense? What about ignoring authentication? Rolling your own?

Turns out when you write APIs that access security related things, you have to treat everything coming in as a threat, right? Shouldn't that be table stakes by now?

We need a professional gatekeeping organization because the vast majority of us suck at our jobs and refuse to do anything about it.
Please don't call names or cross into personal attack. You can make your substantive points without any of that, and in any case the kind of internet discussion that focuses on personalities doesn't really cross into curious territory, which is where we're hoping to be.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Why do they give you a number free for 14 days?
I suspect the mathematical analysis could be even simpler. Here's one idea:

View each track piece as a 2d vector. Add up the vectors. In a zero-tension setup, the sum is (0, 0).

As a metric for tension, assume any mismatch in position is evenly distributed. Model this as the average of all the vectors. (Thus the same displacement is more meaningful when we have fewer pieces.)

___

That's the full idea. It might seem that it is ignoring rotation, because it doesn't explicitly mention rotations, but they are included because the effective vector that a track piece provides is both a current direction as well as the displacement contributed by that piece. If we wrote some code to model this, a cursor would consist of a direction (an angle) along with an (x, y) position.

___

Some related math concepts:

* The exterior angles of a polygon sum to 360. So we could have another measure which is how far we are away from 360.

* Not useful in this case, but this also reminds me of winding numbers from complex analysis, which is a way to locally walk along a curve to understand which side is the "inside" or how many times a curve goes around a given point.
True...but with how "top talent" (real or not) scratches so many of the burning emotional itches of the think-that-they're-top SV managers and VC's...

The author needs to write a follow-up article - about how to fool your management into believing that the good employees you actually hired are "top talent"...by whatever metrics their PHB pea-brains measure that.
In theory it might be possible, but it's just as possible that it would go in the exact opposite direction - increasing inequality, exploitation, etc. Given who is best able to influence the development and deployment of AI, which way do you think that will work out?
There was a big discourse called the "socialist calculation debate" that basically revolved around whether a planned economy could ever "beat" a market economy. To summarize a big complicated thing in a nutshell, a market system is pretty neat because market forces are determine the price (a reflection of the value) of goods and services in an unplanned manner. It's a system that takes in information, and the various actors in the system respond accordingly. It's never 100% accurate, but given enough time and stability, it's usually pretty close.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_calculation_debate

However, a pure free-market systems is always a reaction to information, so there's a lag in whether the price accurately reflects the value of a good or service. At the worst of times, prices can suddenly skyrocket and/or plunge, and if this ripples out, this creates the familiar boom and bust cycles in capitalism.

In the socialist calculation debate, proponents of a planned economy say it should be possible to determine the accurate prices of things faster than the market can. Opponents say that the economy is simply too complicated to ever take in enough information to calculate such things.

This discourse was all occurring well before computers and the Internet were common. The most recent serious attempt at a socialist planned economy was in Chile under Allende, who saw the potential of using technology to gather and organize such information. Chile in the 70s effectively built a proto-Internet to send information from manufacturers to a centralized location, where macro-economic decisions could be made based on the information (google "Project Cybersyn"). It would have been a really interesting test of the idea, but unfortunately the United States could not allow a democratically elected socialist leader to stand, and the CIA backed a coup to overthrow Allende. The US then installed Pinochet in his a place, a brutal dictator :(

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Cybersyn

I'm of the opinion that with widespread computer and Internet adoption, such calculations are not only possible but happening all the time. However, such "planned economies" exist to serve capitalist corporations such as Wal-Mart and Amazon rather than the economy at-large. A book called "The People's Republic of Wal-Mart" is a good discussion on that topic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_People%27s_Republic_of_Wal...
Apple's September Event name looks like a cryptic Apple Watch Ultra 2 reference
A comprehensive discussion of the topic: https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/emergent-abilities-of-large-...
that's such a silly conclusion though, and really a perfect AP piece. It discredits people while saying nothing.

It doesn't matter if the phrase existed before hand, it very obviously blew-up during the JFK event.[0]

It could entirely well be that the DoD didn't invent the phrase, but it's pretty obvious that it very quickly became a part of the public verbage during heavy interest in the JFK event -- that trend could have easily been the indicator of work towards the discrediting of both the term and those that had too much curiosity towards things they shouldn't question.

[0]: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=conspiracy+the...
This is my first time really reading about them, I'd assumed they'd do some ASPX style interactivity where server components updates on the server and send back html, it's interesting that they haven't tried to go for something like that, meaning this is a lot more limited in scope in some ways than I'd thought.