skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Considering this thing needs 400GB of VRAM for non-quantitized inference, I'd say they have struck already. My bet is on smaller expert models in some sort of MoE architecture being the way forward (what GPT-4 is rumored to be), along with really small models that are trained on a massive amount of tokens for a long time to be used as even more specialized experts and/or for speculative execution (where a small model generates a sequence, and the large model will look it over and correct where needed).
Many people do good things that are not their job, the worst thing that could come out of this is that you lose your drive and curiosity and start playing things safe.
I actually gave up on clicking those links. Can somebody explain why this happens? I really can't stand this game. It has an immersion factor of zero and I hate backpedaling to the start.
Here is the deal. Good diplomacy you have to back and forth. Make both feel like you want to support them if only they did X/Y. But what Germany did was not even trying to preserve the relationship.

There is a balance there. Not allowing the Austrian to make war in the Balkans is pretty basic, and that's all that was needed. What was Austria gone do, not like they have other options. Worst case Austria and France make a deal, but given the terrible state of the Austrian army this isn't a thread, and it would open up better relations with Russia.

German had all the cards and simply played them in a bad way.
Yes! I'm a bit surprised it's still iPhone-only.

I was in fact listening to classical music in Music on my Apple TV only yesterday (and found a nasty bug where it wouldn't play the track I asked for, which I should probably report).

I was doing this because Dolby Atmos tracks AirPlayed to my Apple TV + non-Atmos receiver come out only as stereo, but the same tracks played in the Apple TV Music app come out as 5.1.
”If” does not imply that the people do believe the above is a good idea. It is merely hypothetical.
"Plain obvious" is an argument that it's not astroturfing.

It's a link to a blog on the company site, linked by someone whose profile clearly discloses they're CEO of the company. (though based on comments below, the disclosure in profile might be an hour more recent than the post itself).

Personally, I find this interesting, on-topic, and (after the profile edit, if any) totally fine.
The email allows you to enter a new password, it doesn't validate some other access to your account by clicking yes.
If I block and throttle you already then yes, I reserve the right to break your downstream service by feeding you bad data.
Curious if Apple buying a record label somehow re-stirs the Beatles/Apple Corp/Apple Records vs Apple Inc fight.
Well, Germany one, initially one front each per world war. All it took for the stalemate in the West to settle in was the British being allied with the French, and then Germany couldn't realistically win in the West anymore.

But yeah, had the Germans played it smarter, things could have ended differently in 1914. Thing is, they didn't.

Also, the US played a much smaller role in WW1 than people think, Germany lost too early for the USmilitary and numbers to make much of a difference. Most, almost all, of the fighting by the Entente in West was done by the French and British.
Is a 50 year old record label old? It's weird how the article calls out the age of the record label, it means it was founded in the 70s which doesn't seem particularly noteworthy to me...

Edit: UMG, Sony Music Group, and Warner Music Group are 89, 93, and 65 years old respectively. So I guess it's noteworthy that it's a relatively young label?
If that is the case, it is probably because your record store only stocks some budget and mid-range classical music releases, the sort of things that sell to relatively casual listeners instead of dedicated fans. Classical records from both the majors and boutique labels that are not part of budget series, typically go for 20€ or more per disc. Especially in the case of the label discussed in the featured article, which released many of its recordings in the hybrid SACD format which is more costly to produce.
Very true. Checks and balances do help, but the don't solve the issue of corrupt politicians.
> This quote puts it quite succinctly: “Do people confuse motor oil, olive oil and jojoba oil? I think not. No more than they confuse vegan steak from beef steak.”

I've met people here in France who did not know what "vegan" means. They also have the word "végétalien" (as opposed to "végétarien"), even less known. So "vegan meat" might not register with a lot of folks.
Would work quite well i think, at last if deployed to deno deploy
There is an option from linkedin to view your public profile - go to your profile and there is a link labled "Public profile & URL" in the top right corner. I believe it shows a view from perspective of non-logged user, however, the visibility options with in the profile are decent enough (even if they do 'update' from time to time). There are options Public(everyone), linkedin users, your connections, only you. I am no fan of linkedin, but all of these socials "require" (not really, but its good practise) the user to check these things on first setup and periodically just in case of 'updates'.

Although thank you for posting, I never thought to view my profile from a person that I am not connected withs POV.
True, though I don't believe there is any reason to think such systems would actually be physically realizable. To me this seems similar to the dome shape where a ball sitting at rest on the top would randomly move down at any time in any direction - it is part of the mathematics of Newtonian mechanics, but it is not necessarily part of the physics of it (since that dome shape requires infinite smoothness, which can't exist in the physical model).
Why don't they use a more obscure domain for internal corporate communication and keep the widely recognized one for messages to end users? Is it just the vanity that people who work there like to be mark.zuckerberg@facebook.com?
> Birmingham was a boom city after the war and might have come to rival London. So why did planners deliberately sabotage its economy?

> Back in the 1950s and 60s, the Midlands was booming. Leicester at the time had so many jobs that employers waited at the gates of other factories to poach workers, and even chased up potential recruits who forgot to come to interviews. In the decade to 1964, service businesses around Birmingham grew faster than any other part of the country; in 1961, West Midlands households earned more on average than any other British region, including London and the South East.

> But all this was ended by London-based planners, who virtually banned new factories, offices and housing south of Manchester in a failed attempt to rebalance the economy. In 1960, the Government even refused Fox’s Glacier Mints permission for a new factory in Leicester to replace its existing building facing demolition for a ring road. That began the story of Fox’s decline in the city, culminating in its recent controversial decision to leave Leicester forever, and illustrates the profound damage caused to the Midlands and the British economy as a whole.
That's not the other way around, that's perfectly consistent with what I'm saying and I agree.
Below all the turtles, if course.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down
> Governments have never had so much control over money and information. They’re not losing control, they just keep tightening their grip.

Well - East Germany must've had worse, surely? All money controlled by the state and state-sponsored spying?
Learn stuff and do projects. If people want experience and you don't have on the job experience, do projects and write blog posts about them explaining your thinking and dev process. It's all about giving employers confidence. That said, the market may just be tough ATM, but at least it's something proactive. Or get certified, for the same reason.
I recall using this method to bypass the strict filtering of my child-level AOL account. I could browse chat rooms and play games on websites I couldn’t access in the AOL browser via IE. Good times!
There are many angles to this. The first one would of course be what you said, there would be no choice otherwise. I think in general a deterministic universe would not be too different from one with true free will, at least from the perspective of our current knowledge and capabilities. People would still make decisions - do one thing and not another - have ideas, talk about them, be influenced by others, just the ultimate root why things go one way and not another would be different.

Even in a deterministic universe you still have to deal with criminals in one way or another, and you have to make the rules and implement them, and for making the rules you have to think about the nature of the universe and what that means for morality. The real mystery for me would here be, why would a deterministic universe bring about a system of morality that takes the determinism of the universe into account?

Or more generally, why can you do anything useful in a deterministic universe? Why are your perception, your thoughts, and your words connected in a meaningful way? Why is it not the case that the universe is in state A, you perceive B, think C, and say D? There is one apple, you see two, think of three oranges, and say half a fork.

Back to the initial question, you could also consider that you are wrong, determinism might be false and you have free will after all. It would then be a bit of a waste to not use your capacity and instead throw your hands up because you - incorrectly - think that everything is set in stone anyway.
Are we sure it wasn't one more kilometer? Has it been rounded correctly? Curvature of the earth taken into account?
> I don't understand enough about UK to see why anachronistic monarchy would be at the heart.

Not saying the monarchy is at heart, just that the culture won't change until they have some sort of cultural revolution and get rid of it.
Black hole electrons are supposed to match all the observable of quantum-electrodynamics (QED) electrons completely; if they don't, then you have something other than a "black hole electron".

Moreover, the idea is not to substitute some QED electrons with black hole electrons, but that all electrons are charged spinning black holes. If that breaks chemistry, it also breaks the idea of black hole electrons.

The original (1938) idea behind black hole electrons was mainly to simply some of the calculations of charges moving in curved spacetime (computers not being available yet), before the development of quantum electrodynamics (1965 Nobel prize in physics), and before the development of an exact analytical solution to the Einstein Field Equations (of General Relativity) for spinning black holes (1963, and 1965 for spinning with electric charge). In particular, they wanted to understand how electromagnetic interactions could change the trajectories of charged particles in both an electromagnetic and gravitational field (and conversely, how the mass of an electron affects the development of an uncharged cloud of gas around it). Einstein and his 1938 coauthors certainly knew some things about electrons, and in particular that they have intrinsic angular momentum (Stern-Gerlach experiment in 1921). Knowing how many details had to be minimized or even ignored in their ease-of-calculation approach, they were surprised it worked as well as it seemed to. "Ease" here is compared to what they thought they would have to work with. Here's their very-much-not-easy paper: <https://sci-hub.se/https://www.jstor.org/stable/1968714?orig...>.

That surprising "why does this work at all?" (it doesn't work especially well) is sometimes thought-provoking, but attempts to formalize the idea that fundamental particles are geometrical
(black holes are a feature of spacetime geometry, so a black hole electron must be mostly geometrical) rather than excitations in quantum fields have rarely made progress. In general, the attempts that have come closest to reproducing successes of quantum field theory have had the most difficult to calculate equations.
>People should not have agreed to buy things where there are parts of it they don't own that they don't even need, but they did.

I own zero IoT devices for the exact reasons you gave.

Frankly, I would prefer to change that state of affairs. I would also prefer far less waste. Tons of these devices end up in the garbage too. That is unacceptable and surely not sustainable.

I am not OK with partial ownership, unless there are clear obligations attached to the other partial owner that have real teeth.

Fact is we have law for this case and that is the rental agreement. That is exactly what partial ownership is.

And when people are asked to value something they will be renting, everything changes. A big change is purchase price. That goes down.

What I see happening is IoT companies business model is priced as if ownership happens when it really doesn't. And that is not OK.

I also find putting that onto people disturbing because it was not the people who who made the choice to advertise a sale and then act as if it is a rental.
The burden is on the person operating 2 tons of machinery in a way that can kill someone

If your assertion that walking along/across the road is dangerous, how come pedestrian deaths in the US where such things are illegal are 22 per million population per year, and in the UK where such things are perfectly legal outside of a small number of dedicated roads is just 5 per million population.

Perhaps the problem is the culture which puts cars above people.
Your timeline is off, the egg can take nearly 2 weeks to implant but that requires a delay in fertilization. This 14 day timeline is specifically in reference to fertilization not the release of the egg.

The discrepancy exists because people can track the day of ovulation and hormonal changes from implantation but actual fertilization has no obvious signs, unless your doing IVF or something and looking at the actual egg.

That said, extreme outliers may exist but that’s not what we’re talking about.
Sure, can you create a bending (momentum?) diagram for that course? :D
> it's very hard to salvage the work into a maintained fork.

How is it hard? Just fork it.
Oh, I guess query logs could help reveal a pattern which could be throttled/blocked..
I love the Internet because I had that same thought. They can definitely claim this purchase for the catalog to expand their classical music offering, but not Apple (Computer) Inc is also now in the record label business, just like Apple Records is. Maybe it's also testing the waters for a move like that. Sort of tin-foil-y, but I dig it.
How about a Do-Not-Track alternative where I can specify what kind of ads I'd be OK to show up alongside my browsing? It could be a header with a hash of an entry in a public list of lists of interest. Cars, travel, fashion, whatever; any order or preference you might come up with. I could flip a switch or install a plugin in the browser to help learn from my browsing history locally, and populate that list accordingly.

Adsense needs to respect that header, is all. I'd ditch ad-block if that happened.

Provided ads are alongside my content and don't replace it's space and time.

I'd use that.

EDIT: apparently, the basic idea is there; but also cookies will now only come from the website being viewed, not tracking you across the whole Web.
Posted to HN, by an account that isn't clearly affiliated with the content, most likely upvotes by a bunch of company people, and from a company that has a history of using public resources like marketing channels.

As for whether or not this is fine: yes, it's fine. "Show HN: We reached a new RF distance record with LoRa" from an account associated with the company.
So they are trying to get the law passed, despite the obvious objection that message filtering is impossible, by saying "we know it's impossible but we would like to have the legal right to do it in case it becomes possible in the future"?
Ah, sorry, I see now, but the underlying point is the same. You should not reveal any information. A "We have sent an email to the address associated with the account" would be sufficient.
Sorry the post wasn't super clear. It's coded in plain html / js with no framework, need something that can handle just the payment part, have a pluggable UI (or temporarily direct to another page) of forms / buttons to take various payments methods. I'm looking at Stripe Elements right now, looks like what I want, but also curious about other options!
They couldn't ban WhatsApp even if they wanted to.
I got these reset emails, for email addresses on an account that I use multiple times per day. Same for friends of mine.
Idagio is amazing and I’m really bummed for them that Apple is moving directly into this space.

https://www.idagio.com/
You realise the 'anachronistic monarchy' is just a tourist attraction/diplomatic lever at this point, right? Britain is a parliamentary democracy. I'm pretty confident Charlie doesn't have a hand in enabling sweeping snooping powers. More hacking scandals are the last thing his poor family needs!
How did you add people to your freind lust in chat? Was there a registry if screen names, or did you just add whatever screen name you wanted, whether it existed or not?
Is Google's looming monopoly trial a watershed moment for Big Tech?
If this is true, then universe is local and real and all of our observations are correlated with previous events and we will never be able to find out the truth of it through observation.

Although, if everything is unified/interconnected under the same consciousness and this manifests as non-local effects in the universe, then there's room for the universe not being deterministic.

Similarly, maybe determinism is a wrong way of looking at it. Maybe there is no true relationship between one moment and the next, and it is only your observation that sees the ordering of events. Maybe all of the events exist everywhere all at once and their ordering, progress, unfolding is just a flaw of the observation. How would an object like a photon perceive the universe and can it perceive given that photon never meets time?
I bet you are reading Deutch’s The begging of Infinity.
Wow, this is just crazy cool. I can imagine this growing into a thing.
on the systems where i had to do this for my account i usually get a message like: "an email has been sent to the address registered with this account"

there is no benefit to reveal any details.
SourceForge Is Down
This code while cool is not very idiomatic or perhaps not something you’d see in production often. That’s ok, Joe loved to explore and experiment.

The way it works is that F is a closure. It contains some code but could have captured variables as well as it’s environment. Calling F() then executes the code and it will have access to the whole surrounding environment when F was created.

In Erlang we can send a closure across the network to another Erlang node. That can be used and is cool but you still need the module code referenced in the closure available on all nodes.

Long story short, in production code you’re right, we would just call the F module directly and pass its the arguments explicitly. This is more of a cool demonstration of possibilities.
It's absolutely the responsibility of financial institutions to secure their premises and systems. Banks have massive security departments, guards, access restrictions, systems to detect fraud, vaults etc. The government only gets involved once a crime is reported, not in securing facilities.

In fact, inadequately protecting their assets from mistakes or attacks can lead to SEC fines on top of losses,

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2013-222

If there is an attack in progress, the police will intervene, of course. But if it leads to a financial institution collapsing because all their money was in the one place and they weren't insured, then that's the fault of the bank.
I think the Classical app is both for the sake of the music but also a play at multiple interfaces over the same literal .app, which is different enough from how they've been doing things that it will take longer to figure it out. I say this because when I start listening to the Classical app and then connect to CarPlay, it still appears to just be Music, but not in the way that any app could read Apple Music and serve sounds from it, more like a different entry point to Music, akin to multiple activities on an Android app. Without any inside knowledge and very minimal sleuthing, I'm definitely ready to be super wrong, but interested and kinda hopeful to be see if I'm right.
Thank you for saying this. I think once things enter the culture war, normal and sensible people will get mugged by stupid, unexamined ideas so long as they’re on the right side of the culture war. So many conversations boil down to AI=BAD or CRYPTO=BAD, which is a shame not because the opposition is wrong - that’s your opinion who am I to disagree - but because once people have their conclusion they just stop thinking and once you stop thinking you’ve got no way of noticing if your thoughts on a matter are totally stupid.
I think the subscription model is fine. What's not fine is the cost of subscription software. With so much competition in the market the price should go down but unfortunately so far that has not been the case. We at neeto from get go are going for a low price. https://blog.neeto.com/p/neetocal-a-calendly-alternative-is
> Author here. I did wrong. And I'm sorry I didn't stay on the right side of the law.

Oh I don't care frankly. I know it's not the right thing to do, but I am refering strictly to the technical content of the blog. I am not a judge nor do I plan becoming one. I would notify the domain owners about issues in their websites, but I am not a lawyer and I don't know the implications of it.
So once an hour, each auth server requests a certificate (for a new private key) from the HSM. It caches that for the hour, and issues certificates for the clients signed by its private key - and puts them in a token including the chain with the cert from the HSM and the cert from the auth server. Clients validate no cert in the chain is expired.

That way, the HSM only needs to do one transaction per hour per auth server. If auth tokens need to be valid for 24 hours, then the certificates from the HSM need to be valid for about 25 hours (plus some leeway for refresh delays maybe).

If someone compromises the auth server and gets the private key (or gets in a position to request a cert from the HSM), then it is still quite bad in the sense that they have up to 25 hours to exploit it. But if this is only one of many controls, it still provides significant defence in depth, and cuts off certain types of attacks, especially for APTs who might not have any available TTPs to gain persistence in a highly secure auth server environment and who only briefly manage to gain access or get access to stale information as in this case.
There are plenty of great vehicles to buy that don't have a $25k markup.
> I have so many issues with the idea that government is a benefit to us,

The Internet started as ARPANET a US Government military program. You seem OK using it.
Such a nice guy:

https://techcrunch.com/2022/06/03/dave-clark-the-longtime-he...

> Clark has been unapologetic about his cavalier style, once telling Bloomberg that he favored “lurking in the shadows of … warehouses and scoping out slackers he could fire” during his early years at Amazon.
https://archive.ph/qwvRn