skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> do you remember how happy and fun life was when you were teens?

Well, no, not really? My teenage years weren't even particularly terrible, but I definitely had a lot more fun in my 20s, and I'm quite sure I'm not the only one.
The feds would probably be able to use metadata and facial recognition comparison against existing CSAM databases to verify many such cases. And investigators would likely use hints such as the image resolution or comparison to other images on the drive to verify if a collection is a photoshoot or a crafted prompt for example.
Closed mouth thumbnail led to longer watch times on YouTube
Yes, so GP is essentially correct.
Indeed. All these evolution-denying arguments have been repeatedly refuted in great depth.
It seems to me, that May was more honest than most other politicians about social care reform, saying "if you want decent social care, let's not pretend it doesn't need paying for. Here's a proposal for how to fund it". Which IIRC included siphoning off some £ that would have otherwise been inherited, which to me seems reasonably fair, because getting much of an inheritance is a luxury that only a privileged portion of people receive. And in return the electorate said "f* off we're not paying". No wonder we're at a stalemate. Later, the Tories brought in the 1.5% social care levy on income. Which I throughly agree with as again, a reasonably fair way to fund this. Labour at the time opposed that claiming it was taxing the poorest. What does Labour want instead? More money in poor people's pockets but cr*p or non-existent social care instead? What's their proposal instead then? The social care levy lasted a few months before Truss ditched it. It seems to me the main parties have both failed miserably overall on social care and that they need to work together. Over the last few decades no gov't of either stripe has a decent record on it. Better that they make this non-partisan, de-politicise it, and agree not to fight each other's policies on it. Because at the mo' , people are having awful lives and dying of neglect (massive number of deaths of people with learning disability for example during covid), due to lack of funding for the sector. And the people working in the sector are getting paid less than supermarket staff and having to use food banks despite having full time jobs. And any person may at some time in their life need social care or someone they care about need it. Which is why is is staggeringly short-sighted of anyone to whinge about paying more tax to fund this. But that's apparently the position of the electorate as a whole. I despair in people, I really do.
Try reading the rest of the page you linked. It states what I claimed.

And copyright is not the only form of legal protection available to code.

This approach fails on all fronts.
Does anyone have more details on the real issue?
To me it sounds more that space10 did innovation not aligned with the business objectives and therefore cut cut off thanks to political power. Saying that they stop on a high note is painting it better than it seems as to me there are few worthy products, innovation that seemed to came out and transformed the business.
It's still useful when dealing with high-latency links with non-zero loss. Fine, something might outcompete it, but without it the throughput would suck anyway.

E.g. if a service runs on a single server (no CDN) and you occasionally get users from Australia then the site will by a bit laggy for them but at least it won't be a trickle.
> What this may be politically is a way of the Government saying they won’t actually do it

But this is the problem: the Government is NOT saying they won't actually do it. They're saying "we'll do it (when we consider it technically feasible)". The ability to force 3rd party scanning software is STILL going into law, and that's the catastrophic bit!

It's terrifying that this story has been perceived as a victory, and therefore we can take the pressure off. The OSB is STILL on track to go into law giving the government the right to tell Signal or WhatsApp or Element etc that they either need to do compulsory scanning or they are breaking the law.

I am literally receiving emails from Element customers and suppliers which begin:

> Saw that the government backed down from their plans last night and immediately thought of Element – you must be pleased!

...which just leaves me speechless. I'm almost wondering if there's a deliberate misinformation campaign here to prematurely claim victory in order to derail the attempt to protect encryption in the bill.
> There have been database and system tools to detect zombie services and underperforming queries since time immemorial.

as you mentioned "there have been......tools", there is always a tool best suited for a specific job, but it doesn't mean you need all the capabilities of that tool all the time. Too many tools lead to huge fragmentation inside the organisation to support multitude of tools

So why not have something one layer below your stack (kernel level) which can do good enough job to monitor almost everything you have. Its not only about if eBPF is cool, it is just reducing the fragmentation by going level below and extracting more info with a single suite of tools.
Teams should introspect at a group level. That’s not controversial or relevant.

Unsolicited individual feedback has the potential to cause harm and an outside observer (you) can’t know the situation. So the safe and respectful move is to simply ask first. It costs nothing, your feedback is heard, and no harm is done.
For hundreds of years feudalism was also a clear winner. It's unlikely that capitalism will even last as long as it did.
I've been thinking about making an app in the style of Tamagotchi, but where you do the habits you want to learn to 'feed' the Tamagotchi.
I would bet that He writes Lisp. Ultimately everything is the same. Particles. Above it: particles made of particles.
Years of experience don't mean much, if you just repeat the same thing over and over again and aren't willing to learn new things and reevaluate your workflows.

I have seen people with decades of experience who remained stuck doing things the same way they first learned to do them and refusing to adapt.
Video is just a bunch of still images (except potentially with degraded quality from resolution and/or motion blur) so it's much the same as asking "how does one practically capture a 3d scene" without the video part. Regular photogrammetry - but with interest and practicality gradually increasing for NeRF style approaches.

(Although I am suprised that there's not more attention being paid to the extra spatial relationships that can be inferred from merely knowing something is a video. Surely it could be used as an extra constraint when inferring camera poses - you know the camera can only move in certain ways from one frame to the next?)
Posting ones own content is not astroturfing unless they try to hide that it was them.
Here [1] is a wet bulb calculator. The first time I started playing with it, I actually assumed it was must have been somehow wrong. But as I get the same results from numerous other calculators, I can only assume it's right. The problem you run into pretty quickly is that the supposedly 6 hours of inescapable lethality at 35C occurs regularly around the world, and often significantly higher.

And people, in general, are not just dying in mass because of it, including those who work outside most of all day. For instance in Houston yesterday it was 41C/81%, which is a wet bulb of 38. Places with rainy seasons during hot parts of the year are also nailing it pretty regularly. Its things like this that I think causes distrust of reporting. There may be some nuance or explanation I'm missing, but it's not at all apparent. It's also not at all apparent to me why more people aren't asking this question.

[1] - https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/wet-bulb
Here https://www.reddit.com/r/startups/comments/166y35q/how_much_...
I know, I've never made a Show HN post myself. I meant to say other people independently submitted my project here once.
The USSR suffered from the resource curse towards the end. Its an affliction that has destroyed many economies of all stripes. It's the same reason why most of Africa is an economic basket case.

The USSR was instrumental to mankind becoming a spacefaring species. The US wasnt even interested until the USSR started and lost interest once they landed a man on the moon and declared that they had "won" the race. Were they still around space exploration probably wouldn't have stalled.

They were also instrumental in keeping the US government in line. US elites were terrified that the USSR and domestic communists might join forces to overthrow them. Elite fear of communists is why people in the 1950s could easily afford college, medical care and a roof over their head and why they were guaranteed a job doing something meaningful like building a dam or a bridge.

You're probably right that it's better that our finest minds are dedicated to making people click on ads and take out loans, though. This truly is the pinnacle of civilization. You have a whole computer in your pocket. You might have been able to buy a house in the 1950s and not be bankrupted by medical bills, but you couldn't play flappy birds.
You're looking LoRaWan which is not the same as LoRa. In fact I believe web browsing to be quite feasible if you just use LoRa with your own network stack.
"Casadevall has argued that C. auris is an example of just the sort of warming-induced adaptation he predicted. In a paper published in the journal mBio, he and two colleagues posited that the fungus has always been out there; only recently, though, under the pressure of climate change, did it evolve to flourish in the hothouse that is the human body."

That's a compelling hypothesis but it needs more evidence. There are mammals cooler than humans (for example sloths with their famously slow metabolism). Do we see a spike in fungal infections in these species?

This could also be tested directly on fungi themselves. Do we see them enduring higher temperatures than previously recorded?
Arm's Clients and Partners Signal Interest to Invest $735M Ahead of IPO
Another great alternative is JSONPath[1] which unfortunately not as widely supported and known despite being brilliant!

It's inspired by XPath so it's very familiar instead of a complete new DSL. The killer feature imo is the recursive key lookup so you can write `people..address` and it'll find all "address" keys that descend from "people" anywhere in the JSON. It's by far my favorite parsing language for JSON and I wrote an introduction blog on how to use it in JSON dataset parsing [2] :)

1 - https://github.com/JSONPath-Plus/JSONPath

2 - https://scrapfly.io/blog/parse-json-jsonpath-python/
Just imagine the first rove beetle was adapted to be a predator of social insects. It runs to the colony and tries to grab some eggs. It's often detected and killed. So maybe by chance one beetle has a mutation that makes one of its pherhormones (or whatever) smell slightly more like termite. It's a bit less likely to get killed by the termites, so it has an advantage and higher reproductive success. The new genes spreads through the population. The another one gets a mutation that makes it's antennae just a bit more termite-like... You get the idea.

Why rove beetles? No idea, but maybe their body plan was for some reason more adaptible to change morphology? Also maybe because they were closely associated to colonial insects from the beginning as predators, and so had high selective pressure to avoid detection.
I've just been trying to jog my memory of it and it's difficult to find the relevant information among the masses of information about US AOL.
Trading comparable valuation method is the cure for FOMO and hype
All VCs, including the pre-seed/seed stage, should use the trading comparable valuation method to set a basis for valuation when pricing a round.
That's why I'm curious...

I feel like people figured out how to do this in the past in a cost effective way (even including delivery!) but then we somehow moved away to something (arguably) worse.

My hypothesis here would be perhaps the increasing abundance of choice makes it inefficient, since the main drawback I recall was that there was just like 1-2 local providers that handled each type of thing rather than like the 4 brands of milk we get at supermarkets today [in the US]. Though, I can't see why modern supply chains couldn't be refitted to handle this? E.g. your package delivery person / mailman also recovers the reusable containers etc.
Who would drive?

We have, for better or for worse, no one-world government. We don't have a great way to overcome free riders, etc. A nation or group of nations can choose to reduce their emissions, but this means it's easier to undercut them on the global market. The same thing happens with human rights - it's cheap to buy stuff made by enslaved people, so we do.

There's no body that's really able to price negative externalities correctly. Emissions kill people - lots of people - yet there's no real price for using other people's lungs as a dump. For a brief window that body might have been the US and its hegemony, but the US doesn't have the power it used to. Perhaps China will take up the mantle - not much benefit to conquering the world if there isn't a civilisation left.

We should still do what we can, of course. Perhaps enough students on the bus can shift their weight or grab the wheel enough to stop it careening down the ravine. Technological advances have certainly helped in terms of making renewables more competitive against fossil power.

I also think teens are largely sad because they are lonely - so are adults; we have fewer friends and see them less than we used to, and social life has been torn to shreds. My mom thinks the same; she grew up on streets where kids ran outside to play with friends and neighbours _all day long_. But there were far fewer cars (and they were smaller and slower), and there was a parent in almost every home to keep an eye on things out the kitchen window.
Cool! I had a tour a few months ago at this Telescope in Dwingeloo. Highly recommended, was amazing to hear the live sound of a pulsar (in the Crab Nebula).
My question is more general: what are some relative pros/cons of Go vs Erlang/Elixir when it comes to their approach to concurrency?
And there was a redaction system, which did not redact the key ("race condition"). Then a detection system, which didn't detect the key. And then the key was used to access an entirely different system with an entirely different access level and it just worked anyway.

The phrasing as "some obscure bugs were carefully exploited" seems a bit off, it looks more like a comedy of errors where none of the security systems served its purpose at all.
Apple buys 50-year-old record label to grow Apple Music Classical app
Who pays for your free banking? Other people? Taxpayers?

How about people realize services cost money and pay their own way?
`jq` solves the problem of JSON in legacy shells. But I think the real problem is that the world is stuck using Bash rather than a more modern shell that can parse JSON (as well as other data structures) as natively as raw byte streams.
In addition, even selfish people should care about loss of biodiversity if only because it facilitates disease transmission, and so is a threat to food security and public health.
Please don't astroturf a corporate driven "developer community"

> marketing bodies

There you go.
The Epic Games Launcher:

- remembers which pane you were on last time you closed, so you'll never see the store unless you go there on purpose.

- allows you to disable every notification.

You're never going to see a Fortnite ad, please make up a new imaginary problem.
In cases like this I'd just make a QR code of the url
> What is the primary goal of a software engineer

To scale and/or replace humans with automation and to create revenue streams (hopefully by providing value to customers).
Jacques’ point is spot-on. What word would be more precise? shilling? spam? The word astroturfing seems fine to me
The urgency is not their problem. If the screen is important to your work, you go get a new screen in 48 hours max. You then re-sell the second screen after it gets repaired and mark the difference as a cost of business.
A softer way of renegotiating the contract is to pay the parking enforcement officers out of the parking meter revenue. The less revenue submitted back to the city would mean less enforcement, and therefore less meter compliance, which is less revenue back to the outsourcing company.
That's all fine and dandy until God's lowest bidding outsourcer writes a naive loop and evaluates everything rather that just what's needed. Next thing you know you've got bits of universe all over you.
> This has nothing to do with low-rank approximation.

Literal-minded people are an endless source of joy.
Location: Sibiu, Romania

Remote: Yes or Hybrid

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: React.js, Next.js, Typescript, Javascript,
Tailwindcss, PostgreSQL

Resume/CV: Upon request

Website: https://ciobanunicolae.com/

I'm an aspiring developer looking for internships or entry-level jobs
This article perfectly encapsulates the current insanity that's infecting the young generation. To be honest it almost got me too.

Global warming can be solved. We're already transitioning to green energy at an amazing pace. Geo engineering is a solution in the meantime (which she dismisses completely without reason "which could either cool the planet or kill us all even faster."). Once we've built out an over capacity of solar and wind we can think about carbon capture and storage.

The real crisis is that people are not having kids, and unless you hate humanity you probably want there to be one in the future. We're all trending to be South Korea which now has a birthrate of 0.7. Zero point seven! Every thirty years a school class would go from 30 students to 10! South Korea is dying, and so is the rest of the developed world, albeit at a slower pace, so far.

The solution: AGI, robotics and longevity are all things that the doomers are actively opposed to.
But we are a part of nature as well, and have no choice but to interact with it.
There is no such thing as a perfect ecosystem equilibrium (If only because of entropy), life is constantly evolving, whether there are humans involved or not.

I understand your point and frustration though, as striving to preserve diversity (of species and ecosystems) is good because they are a valuable source of knowledge and resilience. And as a species we've done rather poorly in that regard, especially in the last century.
There seems to be this persistent romantic nostalgia for the culture of at least the postwar era but also extending back through the Industrial Revolution and maybe beyond. We have all these materials of men in suits looking so professional as they sit at drafting boards and prototype new machines! Oh, how our culture has degraded! Must be the dang kids with their dang TV/video games/hip hop/Tik Tok!

But the older I get the more I come to realize that human culture hasn't changed all that much, what has changed is the democratization of cultural displays. Now that the "elite" are forced to compete with the "rest" in media (social or otherwise), that retro perfection spell is broken and the idealists are butting up against the reality that humans basically want to be carefree and revel in the enjoyment of life.

So what achieved such rapid technological improvements the past couple hundred years? Well, it's pretty clear by now that good ideas happen all over the place, and money flows relatively freely to make these ideas available for public scrutiny and adoption. What changed seems to be the working conditions of the rest -- child labor and 12 hour days in grueling conditions made the Industrial Revolution successful (largely for the elite), and forced/exploitative labor made the computing revolution possible in the 60s up until now in the mining and manufacturing sectors. Now that people are fighting en masse for a global solidarity centered around respect in the workplace, you are seeing elite complaints about how it will destroy civilization as we know it, presumably based on a convenient and self-serving nostalgic view of progress as something that "requires" "sacrifice" from others (never themselves, somehow).

If culture has changed to any serious degree, what's changed in the rest is that we realized this life is about more than toil and scraping by.

Yet many of the rest believe themselves to be temporarily embarrassed elite and so have looked upon those around them with contempt and disdain, citing arguments of moral degeneracy ("mind virus"), etc. to fuel their reactionary ideologies. The reaction has been swift and the elite have the money to fuel it as part of public discourse through influence of the media machines, but they cannot completely quash this rising tide because media companies are still beholden to the economic forces that the elite instituted in the first place -- popular stuff makes money, so these ideas continue to be visible in popular media.

No one was ever driving. Only the superorganism called society can be said to be "driving", and even then we would need to qualify that heavily to be clear despite the clumsy language. Treat your fellow humans as such so collaboration is possible and this may actually work out.

Also, please stay alert and in control when you drive. Collaboration works best when you keep your neighbors alive.
Bit too easy to point the finger at "the adults" and "tech bros" while at the same time not providing even a glimpse of a suggested solution to any of the problems the author enumerates.

Teens are sad, oh my god! Bad adults are taking their tiktok away.
Just How Big – Or Small – Is the Quantum Computing Racket? – The Next Platform
And people tell me the universe is not intelligent. I think what scares us is that intelligence, like _real_ intelligence, is prior to thought and so it seems almost alien and incomprehensible to us. Yet these creatures clearly know what they are doing at some level. Just as we know what we are doing with our lungs, heart, nervous system etc. that evolved over thousands of years, but we don't know it in thought - so it eludes us as something external.
I imagine Neuromancer predates both
I mean that these are great things to fight for, but I think it can't be the full horizon of someone's life. Because these fights don't justify themselves with their own importance. Why is it important to fight climate change? Why is it important to figure out how to pay your loans?
In Clojure, where lazy evaluation is also the default (although only for sequences), someone recently wrote an in-depth article about the issues caused by this choice: https://clojure-goes-fast.com/blog/clojures-deadly-sin/

I haven’t read the whole article yet, but maybe it could be interesting to compare it with Haskell and see if some of the same problems occur or if Haskells compiler or overall design around (pervasive) lazyness makes it easier to work with and more performant.
Market stop prices from going too high but doesn’t solve the problem of shortage. If part of the problem is that it is hard to get a certification required to be a driving instructor government can work on making it easier/faster (not going to happen unfortunately).
Lightweight? Are we talking about the same piece of software?

That hasn't been my experience at all, it's the most sluggish launcher I've ever dealt with.
But then the attacker URL will be different.

That doesn't look like a new attack vector, this is called phishing, isn't it?

XSS means you can inject and persist code in a webpage maintaining the same URL accessed by other users.

If you create a bigbank-fake.com and copy a manipulated version of bigbank.com's HTML, this is not XSS.
Mar-a-Lago IT worker struck cooperation agreement with special counsel