skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The benefit is that people often don't remember which email they used for a service. They check their "main" email inbox but don't remember that they used their student email address 8 years ago when they signed up. By providing a hint they know which inbox to check and don't get frustrated because the email isn't coming.

So it is a privacy tradeoff for better UX. If it is a good tradeoff will depend on how much you value each.
ChatGPT has massively improved my ability to work with jq. I use it just infrequently enough that I constantly have to read the docs for anything non trivial, but ChatGPT lets me pump out scripts quickly. It's been super nice for my work flow.
This is why I use random usernames post tiktok social media, and random profile pictures. I also stopped using Linkedin and keeping it up to date, way too invasive!
MoneyCoach – Add Transactions via Interactive Widgets
With the upcoming iOS 18 major update, MoneyCoach will allow you to enter transactions via an Interactive Widget directly from the Home Screen
Thanks for pointing out my exaggeration. You are right, I'll tone it down a little.

What I meant to say is that as it stands most governments aren't a shining example when it comes to overseeing their own software efforts.
Relative to Search’s ~200 billion? Yes.
> Casual spying on citizens is new to Western governments (unless you count East Germany as Western).

depends on "casual" and "new" I guess? Echelon is a dragnet from the 70s, and at least the US, UK and Australian governments spied lots on anti-war protestors and environmentalists and civil rights campaigners and trade unionists. Some Australians wrote a book called "Our ASIO Files" (ASIO is the Australian internal spy/security agency) based on being surveilled during the 80s.

> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Dam_Youth_Escort

did you not read the article you've linked? this was never deplpoyed.
Exactly. What are they talking about?

Not only will it become law but in 3-5 years they will continue to tighten the screws.
A “computation” is a concept that we have in our heads. Computations only actually occur as an interaction among some substrate of the physical universe. So you’re still saying that if you arrange atoms and energy in the right configuration then we go from zero consciousness to some consciousness. If you can find that configuration I’m certainly open to being convinced.

Even your “non-gradualist” explanation does in fact run into gradualist problems, as you mention one of when a child “becomes conscious.”

You assert that this theory is falsifiable: how so? You can’t even falsify the notion that there’s only one consciousness at all in the entire universe (yours, the one you’re “doing”).

Regarding moral implications, inconvenient moral conclusions are not the same as “no help in arriving at moral conclusions.” You just named one such conclusion that you’d be compelled to arrive at (I wouldn’t, personally), so it’s not really true it doesn’t help determine the answer.
I have no idea what the background is in this particular case; but where I work I‘m sick and tired of people „improving performance“ of systems which are not critical at all, at the cost of code, architecture and infrastructure complexity.
So sometimes it can be bad.
ListenBrainz has a young team of developers (contract and volunteer) who have a particular focus on, and love for, our Android app.

That team has hit a milestone recently - three social music feeds have been released in the 2.3.0 ListenBrainz app release (as well as other updates).

If you’re interesting in music data, social ecosystems, and how transparent and open-source organisations (e.g. the not-evil team) can make that combination work, they would love your input and thoughts.
I could have written this same comment in 2008 about my OpenMoko. It certainly did some useful low-level work (especially when Maemo/Meego/etc. increased the importance of standardisation), but its biggest own-goal was repeatedly throwing away the user-facing stuff (jumping from GTK, to EFL; when QtMobile/Qtopia was actually the most usable!).

Still, that did last me a decade; although I replaced it with a PinePhone rather than a Librem ;)
The article characterizes him as a "moderate Republican," which is an endangered political class in the state. His core constituency is probably your median "social moderate/fiscal conservative/anti-labor" CxO residing in the ultra-moneyed enclave of Highland Park, where he moved to last year. Take his show on the road to any major blue city or the deep-red GOP bastions in the west and he'd quickly discover just how unloved he'd be.
Well I have a job, so yes!
> they are oblivious to the idea that associating those cultural practices with a race is the racist part

Is the issue here that English doesn't have a word/concept like "culturism"? If there was such a word, would it be fair to call those people racist when they specifically are saying they don't care about race but cultural practices instead?
Absolutely! Both Akita and Kubeshark have made significant contributions with their innovative approaches. However, Alaz - Ddosify stands out from the rest due to its effortless integration with the Ddosify Observability Platform (Cloud and Self-Hosted). This integration not only enables users to monitor their applications within the cluster but also to generate load tests for their applications that run in the cluster to spot glitches instantly. Moreover, the platform offers a unified dashboard that displays both the cluster and application performance metrics, service maps, and actionable insights (such as detecting zombie services), providing a comprehensive view of the system. Alaz is incredibly easy to set up by installing a DaemonSet into the cluster. We have many exciting developments planned for Kubernetes monitoring! With the help of our community, we are prioritizing the features on our roadmap. Thank you for your valuable input.
Switch to OpenStreetMaps Serving Tiles
It’s like they missed bikeshedding about whitespace and whether variable names were appropriately self-documenting in PRs.
`ls` doesn't have a 'parent' in the hierarchy. `exa` does, it's `ls` itself, so there's a fallback. When there's no fallback, it cannot be deprecated; there's nothing to use otherwise. So it's either kept alive or forked indefinitely.
That person may not have actively searched your name. Recommendation algorithm may find a link in an unexpected way between the two of you. The world is not that big.

That can also be a creep. You cannot know for sure.
If the city of Chicago had just raised prices instead of leasing out the meters and letting someone else raise prices, it would have been a much better deal for the city of Chicago.
I wish I could find the Future font that was once popular on ZX Spectrum
> why all these companies are adding arbitration clauses

It limits downside. So if you’re someone who could and would sue, it constrains you. If that’s you, opt out. For anyone who wouldn’t (or can’t afford to), it’s a net gain.

Most people don’t escalate disputes to even their regulators, so from the company’s perspective they’re irrelevant. If consumer behaviour changed to actually engaging arbitration, companies would be less enthusiastic about it.

TL; DR Arbitration is a bet by companies on the masses’ complacency in exchange for dampening short-tail legal risk. If you’re not in that tail, if you’re among most Americans, you can exploit this calculation.
Socialism is like LISP - at this point most languages adopted the best parts, and the remaining ones come with serious disadvantages.

USA could really use some more socialism tho.
Rugpulls. Companies building off the backs of a community and then trying to form a moat and force you to pay a toll.
Interestingly i don't think we know that the speed of light remains constants, nor could we devise a test to determine it.
On the other hand, MS is pushing Bing hard via Edge/Windows.

Google should know from Chrome's start that a lot of market share is user laziness, if you show up with a functionally equivalent product. Eventually someone clicks "Try X!"

MS' privileging of ChatGPT in Bing-on-Edge is a pretty genius shot.
I'll get some downvotes for this but this is par the course for any serious level of sports teams including high school teams that compete at state levels.

The NFL has curfews, check ins, and bedtimes and I'm willing to bet any other pro and semi pro sports team does too when your assets are entertainers whose sole purpose is to win.

Sleep equals recovery. Alcohol and late nights ruin that. I bet after they won they spent that night partying hard.

As for verbal abuse, watch what men's sport teams go through. There's a great documentary on the turn around of the Florida State gators head coach in the 90s.

Discipline and bodily perfection isn't made by coddling. It's made by pushing someone to 100% and then ekking out even more.

Regardless that article showcases some broadly overarching cultural problems that are endemic to Spain.

As for the, "women sports entertainers should be paid as much as their male equivalent" argument, they need to be realistic with their demands.

Sports entertainers are paid firstly through advertising dollars and secondly through butts in seats. Is the viewership there enough to draw in viewers over the course of an entire season say compared to some team like Manchester United?

I don't know, but their union should be asking Nielsen for that data and arguing from that standpoint. If the answer is yes and management says no, strike. If the answer is no, then maybe those unions should be asking tougher questions to society at large.

Good on the team for winning, it sounds like the tide is finally turning for woman's sports to have the same entertainment draw that make sports does.
this is a very silly take, especially in the case of the UK.

what little actual legal concept of human rights the UK has is also something the current lunatics in government are trying to eliminate also, though.
It makes their music service a little more comprehensive in a way that no other competitor will bother with. Leaving their ecosystem leaves the consumer with death by a million papercuts.
While I think you're being genuine, remember that si vis pacem para bellum: "if you want peace, prepare for war". A blanket antimilitary view is very dangerous. A company should only be ostracised if it's helping carry out war crimes.
Not really. Dave Clark was always in the shadow of Jeff Wilkie. And Dave left Amazon shortly after Wilkie.
> To my knowledge Google and the other big tech companies aren't building application directly for offence/defence.

Actually there was a big uproar about exactly this several years ago https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/07/google-ai...
A bunch of people who grew up during the Iraq/Afghanistan invasions, or for older people Vietnam?

It's been a while since the US was in a war that we looked at afterward (or during, frankly) and said "yeah it was a good and smart thing we did that, worth the costs."
I've had pretty good experiences with it. Most of my jobs have come over LinkedIn from recruiters reaching out and my current job (which I really love) came from applying to jobs on LinkedIn.
I don't see any personal information such as address or phone number or even email visible. What information are you referring to?
> Not sure Google enforces one way of being: there is Bing search instead of Google and iPhone instead of Android.

And Google paid Apple to make them the default search engine on iPhones!

To rewind back to the 90s: there was always an alternative to Internet Explorer. But MS was still punished for bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.
‘Blame the Boomers’ for Surging House Prices, Barclays Says
Japanese city to use robots to tackle rise in truancy
What does spearfishing mean?
Disappointed, read the title as they converted an electric bike into a one-man plane...
A brief illustrated guide to ‘scissors congruence’ − an ancient geometric idea
This isn't necessarily game-specific. I'm not up to speed with current gen, but in the past the simple answer was "it depends", as usual. :-)
There are times where doing some bit-twiddling hacks outperform branching, or where (partial) loop-unrolling is faster than the higher code density of a firm loop, but in the end for trivial cases, the compiler often, but not always, would do these things behind the scenes if you tell it what CPU you want to target. And if you really want the best performance in a particularly hot section, you just have to benchmark every possible implementation and pick on a case-by-case basis, or even provide two or three different implementations and pick the best one at runtime.
LinkedIn is slowly getting worse in order to maximize revenue. A few examples:

- hiding profiles if you're not logged in (I know, for now you can keep reloading)

- preventing you from DM'ing people you are not connected to

- allowing anybody who pays for premium to DM you, even when multiple users have reported that account as a spammer

- literally changing the definition of what spam is to something confusing so that scammers selling "services" to do your work for you and selling overpriced "training" don't match the definition.
This is a common misunderstanding. Harassing people near abortion clinics is a separate offense. The lady in question has harassed people in the past, but she was specifically arrested and charged for prayer in this case. This offense of prayer is separate to her harassment of people.

It’s like if you had drugs in your pocket while harassing someone. They’re separate offenses.

This video explains the situation and references the original police and court records.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FS5FT-4Kx7E
15% isn't small potatoes.
Show HN: goeval – run Go code from the command line
can't argue with that
You could stay on the current version of exa and likely not have an issue for years down the road.
how did we determine there is free will in the universe or haskell?
I'm not aware of any specific recent controversy, but the core concept of autonomous military equipment is extremely controversial. Bloomberg called them "Tech's Most Controversial Startup" a few years ago: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-10-03/tech-s-mo...

Palmer Luckey and Peter Thiel themselves are also quite controversial political actors.
> In former eastern-bloc countries, such trivialities are easily ignored in the lust for the Western decadence

Also because people there remember the horror of Soviet domination. I am ashamed of my country's (US) crimes too, but they don't make the alternatives on offer any better.
People who push back on technology used at the border make little sense to me. Using technology frees up other resources to process migrants more quickly through the abused asylum process. That means they are in detention for less time, they get court cases quicker, and get asylum or removal quicker.
There’s a fallacy in your reasoning, too: The assumption that any government action is a pure “fix” with no downsides at all.

In reality, government actions in situations like this are more about tradeoffs. There will be winners and losers and, despite what some people want to believe, consumers will not unilaterally benefit from these actions. There will be downsides along with the upsides.

Applying heavy handed regulation to some companies while letting others do the same thing creates its own set of problems. Once the government becomes the arbiter of who wins and who loses, it gets ugly and the incentives get very weird.

The other fallacy is that spot enforcement is the only option. When you have multiple companies competing in the same space doing similar things, singling one out as a “monopoly” and targeting them is illogical. You create industry regulation and apply it to everyone. If nothing else, it’s a matter of efficiency.
I say this as a Canadian (meaning - don't take my opinion on the US too seriously), but it's so strange to see what's happening to tech.

US Tech in the past: "we dislike the military, the government, the military-industrial complex (and generally all authority) because we skew hippy and/or libertarian. Let us be creative and free!"

US Tech today: "we dislike the military, the government, and the military-industrial complex because our particular flavour of cultural identity politics doesn't like it. Let us conform to the moral outrage of the day."

Meanwhile, the best reason IMO -- "we dislike the military, the government, the military-industrial complex because it serves the interests of the wealthy first and foremost (at the expense of the poor)" -- seems to get less discussion.

But all of these are reasons why tech can dislike the military or at least be uncomfortable with it, even while DARPA funding has helped progress tech and many innovations have come out of military-first applications.
I'll be curious to see if many people end up subscribed to both this and ChatGPT Pro, are they different enough to both be worth it?
>n cases where a pension job paid less than prevailing wages,

How often is that actually the case? I think it was the ideal and expected result at one time (civil service job + pension = private market job) but the connection was broken long ago.
>That’s approximately a 3% annualized return on investment (1.03^75 ~= 10).

That isn’t accurate, the cash flows should according discounted by the period they’re received in (this contract produces some profits in year 1, more in year 2, etc). What you’ve done is treated it as if the 10x payment is received all at once in year 75.
Scale model generally means you make something smaller than the real thing.

Also they said 'to-scale', but none of this applies, since if you are doing some sort of photogrametry you are getting an accurate model of what you are photographing anyway, that's the entire point.
There is a decent series by Rowan Atkinson on how to build something humorous. For many standup's they basically slowly show after show 'write' their stories. By testing what is good or bad in them and discarding what does not work and keeping what does. I have been watching Josh Wolf on youtube. Not sure he meant to do it. But he tells one joke a few times in successive videos. But each time the story is more funny the newer the video it is. You can tell he is revising the joke and finding where to spice it up.

Do not remember which stand up I heard it from. Many usually try their new material at 2am. If you can not get the people who are decently drunk to laugh it probably is not a good joke.
Sure but we're just discussing hypotheticals here. Courts shouldn't be ruling based on whether 2024 might finally be the Year of Bing.
Should they drop power companies and internet service providers too? How many hops away from direct responsibility is enough for moral purity? I think only one hop should do.
At least in some countries we have not been locking people up for punishment for quite some time. You go to prison to protect the public, change your behavior, and deter others from committing crimes, not for punishment. The public perception, I would guess, has not quite kept up with this development, I think that prison is for punishment is still a widespread idea.
Theres something to be said for old bangers. I had a 31 year old mx5 and now a 13 year old E class. They don't have the touch screen sillyness and tend to be much cheaper to run if you include depreciation. You have to get stuff fixed about once a year with those.
See mah post https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37418702
An article that shows almost exactly that: https://stopa.io/post/265
Yes, capitalism makes people less productive. Wall Street? The richest of the rich get rich by playing games with paper, not by doing something useful to society. Look at all the stupid skyscrapers in NYC that were simply built to launder wealth, aren’t occupied, and are beyond the means of 99.99% of US citizens, yet the dominate the skyline and shade the public parks. Capitalism is designed to have lazy winners.
In Kiwi browser (which after my tests seems to be the best Android browser: chome but with good / old way to scroll cards + ublock) you can make a personalized tab with links to pages.
When you try to add a new page it auto suggests http adress - not httpS. So dont blame it always on users :)
> Now I never say it, I’ll write it on paper and take it with me afterwards, but maybe I’ll start saying “I don’t like giving out that info, but if you must have it, I’ll make a trade: I’ll give you mine and you give me yours.”

That just sounds like a gateway to even more dick pics.
No undergraduate degree is your issue. The market has recovered, but only for people who can hop the first HR filter. For everyone, else I hope you have a strong professional network. Humans aren't even looking at your resume. You are getting kicked by a computer.

My only recommendation is that you reach out to non-fully remote small companies/startups. Those are likely to not have automatic resume filters and they are likely to have few enough decent applicants that they'll give you a try.
UK's Frontier AI Taskforce: first progress report
> https://github.com/eza-community/eza/releases/tag/v0.11.0

> A new minor release, and the first minor release in the lifetime of eza. Why a minor release? Because we just landed windows support, that's why!

Windows support, woohoo!
I think what the parent post means is that not all actual employees of a company may be listed, but there is a good chance that employees that are listed have some connection to those people anyway
I was early enough to get my first name on Twitter and didn't, but did get it on Instagram.

The @tommy on Twitter was a dev at Gameloft who gets constantly harassed in his mentions to give it up. I had a similar problem on Instagram. I've mostly stopped using it, but when I did post and had an open profile I constantly got comments offering money for my username.

Eventually someone set up a follower bot on my account and I was getting hundreds of new followers a day. I made my profile private and don't post anymore, but it's still hundreds of new follower requests per day.
That's why incompetency and or psychological self-destructiveness is a more likely explanation for why Twitter has gone so badly.

Elon finally agreed to buy it and pay for it because litigation looked worse. It is likely he thought he could flip Twitter, if not for a profit, then at least at less cost than a settlement or a judgment against him.

This was a completely impulsive move. He was totally unprepared.
JPEG Network Graphics
So you deinterlace to 60fps with something at least yadif quality. Done and done.
The Jane Elliot story is quite a bit different from how it's usually remembered:

https://thompsonblog.co.uk/2009/10/i-sense-a-malign-presence...
People really aren't thinking clearly about where monopolies come from. The monopolies that are scary are those formed by the government - centralised powers love monopolies! Google and Apple provide a single point of contact for the censorship regime and surveillance state. The risk here isn't Google as a monopoly, it is the government banning competition with Google under some sort of think-of-the-children or national security justification. Google wouldn't even have a monopoly on anything worth having if IP laws were more sane.

Governments generally have objectives. Those objectives are inevitably counter to what a free market would do (otherwise they'd be already achieved). It is usually easier for those objectives to be achieved in a centralised market.

There is no call to look to governments to start prosecuting monopolies. A better place to start is to stop promoting them! Loosen up the financial regulation, start reversing the centralisation of banks, promote liberty. Put in some small tweaks around the edges of contract law to make it hard to constrain the future action of individuals.

Far to often governments build a monopoly, then pretend to fight it. The starting point really should be to stop building them up. The worst monopolies are those created by regulation because they are actually inescapable.