skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Google absolutely has their own internal models that do exactly this. It wouldn't surprise me if Microsoft indeed does have an internal Copilot that is trained on their data, but even on the smallest risk that they leak their code, they wouldn't share that particular model.
Sibling comment from GranPC is correct btw, it's available by default!
And worth every penny of that to avoid the PR that ensues with one of these in the wild.
I'm sure that given a middling-to-Google (say, 30k) bounty it would be done. I'd give it a shot, anyways.
It may be wise to add support for inspection of Wasm modules inside of the Wasmer registry.

You can probably use the Wasmer GraphQL API to easily retrieve them ;)
Goodfellas at 30: The making of one of film’s greatest shots
Dear hyperhopper .. please get out of my head and where did you get that recording of ranting about this movie to my friend drunk at a bar in 2018ish?. :)

Don't forget about the pointless plot of the animal racing with John Boyega's character that went no where.

Also, don't forget the whole dressing down of Poe Dameron by Leia and Vice-Admiral Holdo as lol guy dumb. But the action gets ignored because she decides lol ship danger ram into bad guy.

I found that I hated the movie more and more as I explained the plot to a friend. I went from this is a solid dud to I really hated this when I went and described the action in the film.
That would be simplifying too much. There are a lot of external factors for something being popular, like timing, luck, support from big enterprises and leading colleges, inertia and sunk costs. You could argue that does make python better regardless of the language itself but that poster was talking about a hypothetical scenario in which those factors were won by a language better designed for those tasks. Would you use python if most libraries, docs and support were elsewhere just for the language design as is today?
Thanks for sharing, one thing that I really like is that your code is very clean, formatted and commented. Thats very rare to see when people share their jupyter notebooks.
I’m not much into security but I’ll never forget this one. Fascinating.
> I personally think all of the VPN providers are essentially selling snake oil.

this is incorrect.

nearly all the consumer VPN providers are indeed selling snake oil, and are only useful for obscuring your traffic from ISPs snooping. they keep logs, they have lax security, they sell aggregate whatever to data brokers, they don't give a shit about stopping leaks, etc.

Mullvad isn't, though, and spent loads of effort on ensuring even they can't usefully spy on their users.

> In addition, I think there are better tools for the job. If you want anonymity, use Tor. If you want to bypass geo-restricted content, use Bittorrent.

this is extremely dumb and unimaginative.
I see this argument enough that I will need to make a form response.

Humans should gain the ability to live off this planet sustainably. If we don't work on that now, then when?

We gain understanding of the human body and of numerous technologies through the novelties and challenges of human spaceflight.

The idea of pushing out civilization forward physically through space is an inspiration for engineers and explorers of all kinds. Even if a child doesn't end up being an astronaut, they end up more curious than if we only sent rovers. Because we are human.

It just seems sadly cynical to hear people think "there is no utility to human exploration".
Google devices offer such better security posture than other Android manufactures.

Then there's the issue of privacy regarding Google devices.

I strongly suggest checking out the GrapheneOS project if Android security is of concern.
there's still ISP domain level blocks (based on SNI) to contend with, even if they can't modify any content. Things such as court banned sites (pirating?), age restricted content, etc.
`URL` in node and browser is supposed to be compatible, this looks like a bug (browser ignoring protocols they don't know).
You can tell if people speaking a foreign language are making fun of you, even if you don't understand a word.
Right, so it’s everyone’s responsibility to be completely up to speed with the safety requirements of everything they buy.

You bought a toy for your kid that happened to include lead. Too bad. You were IRRESPONSIBLE! You should have read all the fine print before buying it.

Your local baker’s muffin has arsenic in it and you ate it and died? IRRESPONSIBLE. You should have known that the presence of arsenic is a possibility. You should have checked with the baker if they added it.

That’s a ridiculous approach.

Also, this isn’t new fangled technology. It exists and is widely deployed and there’s no evidence it increases failure by any meaningful amount.
Oooooo... that makes perfect sense.

> That works because the Get monad builds up a description of steps to perform, so is purely declarative.

AWESOME way to put it. Thank you...
Raytheon employs 12,000 people in Tucson alone, about 6% of the number of people who voted in the election for Arizona's 7th congressional district in 2022. Those people also have friends and family who would care if they got laid off.
Not entirely true because NSO (or their clients) have very specific target requeriments. If they want to target another Jamal Khashoggi and lockdown mode is used, they have their incentive to buy and create the demand for any 0day that they can then re-sell to their lovelly clients. No need statistics for this, the incentive is purely greed.
due to its analytics, one can see the number of installs on formulae.brew.sh e.g. https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/awscli but I don't offhand know how to show "most popular across formulae"

I also don't offhand know if those "Build Errors" are their bottle build errors, or it reports all build errors

I'm not ignoring your question, but it's also meaningless to post any such thing on HN since

$ brew list -1 | wc -l
682
CO sensors have a limited lifespan before they must be replaced typically every 5 years or so.

Wen, $53:
https://wenproducts.com/products/gn625ix-1430-co-sensor-modu...

Generac, $169:
https://gen-parts.com/products/generac-generator-part-100000...

This is a not-insubstantial continuous cost adder. And given these modules are almost certainly proprietary, you're at the mercy of the manufacturer in terms of parts availability and cost.

I would expect manufacturers to love this; this has basically converted generators into a subscription service (albeit with a 5-7 year renewal period). And, a potential avenue for planned obsolescence. All they have to do is stop producing the replacement sensor, and those generators will be bricked.

And before you think about trying to disable it:
The regulations specifically require that the generator ensure the sensor is functional, or the generator must prevent itself from running.
The generator wiring etc must be tamper resistant, not accessible by regular tools, to prevent a user from attempting to bypass it.

So, now the generator will have some portion of it as tamper-resistant, by law. I wonder how that will affect reparability?
"Pain" can be nocioception, or it can be the qualia.

We can trivially make a machine with the former, and that acts to minimise that sensory input. Does it have the qualia? How might we even be able to prove it either way?

That subjective experience, qualia or whatever you call it, what I meant here by sentience. Given that the term pretty much always leads to discussion like this, I have only myself to blame for forgetting to mention an any of this in the previous comment.
I was trained as a mathematician but now focus mainly on developing "stable boring" software.

Note that "stable boring" software is almost never "correct" from an academic perspective. The software is stable not because it has achieved theoretical perfection, but because it has been hardened through countless cycles of iteration, debugging, and customer feedback. The "boring" parts.

My #1 advice would be to get a foothold ASAP. University IT/other IT departments can be a good starting point. Even if you don't start out as a SWE, any sort of systems-facing role will get you valuable domain expertise and you will 100% have opportunities to automate whatever work you are doing and eventually graduate into full-time development positions.
Ugh, apple needs to drop these antique image parsers
No, it really isn't when we're dealing with an organization that is audited for SOC 1/2, DoD, and likely others.
It's cheaper to buy, for sure. But we don't know the costs. It's possible that these launches are far less expensive than SLS, but equally unsustainable.
https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/649377main_PL_111-267.pdf

The NASA Authorization Act of 2010 directed NASA to develop a new rocket called the Space Launch System. It set performance requirements for the rocket (use just two stages to lift 70 tons into low-Earth orbit, use a third stage to lift 130 tons to LEO, carry cargo and astronauts to ISS, carry deep-space crew capsule, support gradual increase in performance by "evolutionary growth" with new stages), and required that, "where practicable", NASA should maintain existing Space-Shuttle and Ares contracts, workforces, infrastructure, and technologies, and that the rocket be scheduled to launch no later than the end of 2016.

The precise requirements were written to force NASA to design a rocket that maintained lucrative Space Shuttle-era contracts.

https://spaceref.com/press-release/hatch-passage-of-nasa-rea...

Also, the requirement to upgrade existing infrastructure ensured that billions of dollars went into Bill Nelson's district in Florida. (He is now the highest-ranking official at NASA.)

The law did not establish long-term funding for the development of the rocket. As with all NASA projects, money is granted one year at a time in Congress's annual budget. In 2011, NASA announced the plan to build this rocket. In accordance with the law's requirements and intention, it re-used almost all core technologies, infrastructure, and major subcontractors of the Space Shuttle. There was actually some fuss about this at the time:

https://spacenews.com/shelby-nasa-hold-competition-sls-boost...

but the strategy of "give Congress what they want" has worked: the Planetary Society shows that Congress has consistently granted NASA more money than asked for to fund SLS.

https://www.planetary.org/articles/why-we-have-the-sls

In particular, Richard Shelby (senator from Alabama, which is home to many NASA facilities, and Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee from 2018–2021) was a powerful political supporter of the SLS, ensuring its continued funding, and attacking anybody who even suggested it might not be necessary.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/02/so-long-senator-shel...
Do yourself a favor: buy some fiber cables, two switches and connect both ends like that. This is the only way to "future proof" it (past 1 Gbps) and will avoid you pulling cables for a while - I hope.
I'll look into these things, thank you.
TV? WiFi? Bus?
Is anyone surprised? Or was this a "consiparcy theory" up til today?

All of these review sites, every single one of them, are influence peddlers. All review articles are paid PR. Every single one.
> Great, you agree then that this tool is useful because it will help you try to predict whether a change will break compatibility.

No. I guess you didn't actually read what I said, and decided instead to construct a strawman by carving very few words out of it completely ignoring the rest of the words around them.

> I can barely follow the rest of your comment.

Ah ha.

> Semver is useful in, at least, a decentralized set of actors trying to minimally cooperate with one another by using a short number to communicate coarse but important information with respect to compatibility.

It's not any more useful than a system with only either date/incremental (this is newer than that) or major.minor (I promise that this change breaks, and that other change might also break but I hope not) versioning except for the one case I mentioned, which FOSS decentralization has absolutely nothing to do with.
It's been a long time, but I recall the Royal Tenenbaums just confusing me when I was younger (maybe too young) as I couldn't figure out what the point was. I liked the early Marvel movies as they were fun, but I just can't watch them or the shows on Disney+ anymore as I feel like I've hit my saturation point.
No, not at all.

<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37142194>
As much as I love your reply, the story is pretty interesting - far more than I anticipated. I hope people discover this if just for the pictures alone.
On the contrary, Ventile should never be proofed. PFAS and such were used earlier as a lubricant in the textile mills, but is now replaced with something more eco-friendly. The water-repellant properties of this was something akin to a happy accident. Original WW2-era Ventile did not use this, as you might guess.

Ventile works it's magic by the combination of long fibered cotton, thigtly spun thread and a close weave. The result is a fabric that after some time swells in rain by absorbing water, and then becoming saturated and impermeable(ish) to further ingress of the wet stuff. The inside will feel damp, but not wet. Wool as a base layer is of course an excellent counter to this. And, all the while excess body heat is shed quite effectively. When at rest, put on a wool or fleece 2nd layer, just like with a synthetic shell.

A compromise, yes. But the greatest advantage over 3L membrane etc. in my opinion is the ruggedness and durability, "experienced wetness" beeing alike. And in the high mountains, boreal or a mid-winter climate with months of stable sub-freezing tempratures, this is a supreme choice for your outer shell. Sweat converted to frost forms on the outside of the garment, instead of the inside as it is want to do in a 2L or 3L. Brush it right of, and carry on.
Buying Is Just the Beginning. What Does It Really Cost to Own a Home?
414 miles is not some incredible distance (I’m sure anyone who’s done a cross country road trip has done longer), but 414 miles at 35 miles an hour sounds miserable.

It is interesting how fish-out-of-water the story is, given that the author covers that industry.
I look forward to reading the Google Project Zero blog post about this one given how wild the last one was.
Sure, but “internal bounties have fundamental problems of incentives at any scale” is a different problem than “Apple can't afford internal bounties on an adequate scale to compete with nation-state attackers”.
Surely any solution worth using is going to be doing that on the client side in a way that's independently verifiable.
https://archive.ph/t4GRH
> I have a clue and won't run it indoors.

You say you have a clue, but unfortunately, someone looking at you can't tell if you actually have a clue or if you're an idiot that doesn't. And idiots without a clue will happily claim that they have one. The device is already covered in very clear warning labels that someone without a clue could use to get a clue. (The problem is people who are too smart, and think they have a clue but actually really don't. Which is unfortunate because they look the same as the other people, but loudly think the rules don't apply to them.)

Which leads to the other way we accomplish this, which is to allow people to sit through a course and take a test in order to get a license to do certain things, like drive or fish or remove asbestos or have pyrotechnics.

The challenges of modeling exactly sufficient airflow accurately isn't a short course, so regulation requiring a sensor is the least bad answer.
You had a perfectly good opportunity to call a function madness and then descend into it, why didn't you?
I have no idea, but pointing to some non-working thing and saying "kaput" gets action in any language. It was a tip I picked up back in the backpacking days, and it does seem to work.
that doesn't jive at all with "closed source" and "walled garden" and "remote sdk".
Threat Actors Exploiting Citrix CVE-2023-3519 to Implant Webshells
As i understand it, you would be facing the same problem as with cannibalism, i.e. increase transmission of prion diseases, from the human tissue in the pig.
Yeah – I'll wait to see how that spins out. I'm under the impression that they're making their $$$ from AI tooling, so I'm sure there will be some "secret sauce" optimisation tools that'll be held back from public release.
I can see that for components heavily interfacing with high surface area things like encryption, hardware interfacing etc., but why would that be true for a relatively “pure” computational problem like an image codec? Bytes in, bytes out.
Software liability would effectively crush smaller companies, unable to keep up with the lawsuits, because they don't have billions in the bank.
I try to avoid installing anything with brew, because I can't install a new package without first upgrading all my other packages, which often leads to one of them breaking in not-so-fun ways (e.g. an openssl upgrade breaking my Python installation).
Np, think of it as an enhancement, not in opposition. Your point was very valid. And it's exactly that kind of stuff that won me a lawsuit (15 lines of fairly unique Javascript exploiting a long lived bug in Explorer and Netscape to deliver streaming video to the browser without a plug-in).
The last thing the world needs is more code written in the style of Win32 API.
"Idealist" is unexpectedly "idealist" or very close to that in almost all European languages.
Basically everything. It’s by far my preferred way to install and manage apps.

It has its criticisms, but it’s easy to use and fast enough for the amount I need to use it.
Do you mean the Human Landing System program?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Landing_System
Are hundreds of people drying every year due to these gas drills?

Ok, then yes. We draw the line based on observed effects.

The observed effect is it’s costing the US $1Bn every year and the additional cost will pale in comparison.

If you want to disagree with those numbers fine.

If you think saving $1bn per year and tend to hundreds of lives at the cost of a few hundred thousand is not worth it. Fair enough. That’s why you elect legislators who have to approve and/or can disallow these rules.

The lines are drawn by your elected representatives based on costs and benefits.

That’s where you draw the line.
... well go on then, what do the Finnish babies say as their first word?
Good environment, good facilities, but very underutilized, like I'd say it's only 10% capacity.

Also I think mostly only softbank subsidiaries use it..
Sabotage project? X was "smooth" in 2006, it hasn't moved along. Mixed framerates and resolutions are horrid to use. Performance issues appear with just one 4K screen. High-framerate, FreeSync or high bit depth displays are basically a waste with X.

The only thing X (and KDE) seems to have gotten right is mixed (and fractional) scaling, Windows can't do even decimal scaling properly within just the core UI.
It's still not going to happen accidentally.
wow! all mirror repos (I found 5) have since been disabled :-)

you can still see cached bits of the code via github search -> https://github.com/search?q=path%3AGetSymbol%2FCMainDlg.cpp+...

and a tiny bit of the repo's main page in google's cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ahttps...

and the user's github profile, again from google's cache: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JXXyoV...

the dbgsymbol.com links above still work, obviously.
This isn’t really true (or at least, doesn’t apply across the board). Qwen (Alibaba’s open source model) outperforms GPT4 on Chinese language tasks, and I can further finetune it for my own tasks (which I’ve done, and I confirm it’s produces more natural output than GPT4).

Other benchmarks/anecdotes suggest fine-tuned code models are outperforming GPT4 too. The trend seems to be that smaller, fine-tuned task specific models outperform larger generalised models. It requires a lot of resources to pretrain the base model, but as we’ve seen, there’s no shortage of companies who are willing and able to do that.

Not to mention, all those other companies are already profitable, whereas OpenAI is already burning investor cash.
Only so long as you have the guardrails enabled. One of the guardrails being that copilot will not output any code that exists in any github repo.

We tested copilot with those guardrails enabled and it completely lobotomizes it.

This by the way is not a change. They already had this “Microsoft will assume liability if you get sued” clause in Copilot Product Specific Terms: https://github.com/customer-terms/github-copilot-product-spe...
Negative examples should aid training, right?
The Taliban is a good example. IMO they're evil, but not as corrupt as the US. They did a pretty good job running us out of Afghanistan.
How might that be? SpaceX doesn't have to manufacture whole new rockets for every Falcon Heavy launch, but even if they did, as far back as 2016 they could build 16 new cores (5 Falcon Heavy's worth) per year.

https://spacenews.com/spacex-seeks-to-accelerate-falcon-9-pr...
man two days ago when i said their promise of compatibility with python was startup hype i got no traction. like duh they'll over-promise and underdeliver - it's chapter 1 of every single SV playbook.
I just assume the weaknesses were made to be exploited by the US and other governments.
That might not be greylisting like I'm thinking of, Gmail has its own secret process but in my experience they accept the message and decide if they want to deliver it or not later.

If you don't have a ton of users you don't have the "celebrities getting hit thousands of times with password reset requests" problem and if you do have tons of users, your higher volume of transitional emails makes Gmail trust you more so your issue is much less likely to happen.
It's not knowable for any, but it is knowable for some. You just have to build systems that are in the some and are inherently safe. Difficult, not impossible.
'weakened' is not a binary. Every small step to correct issues is important
Probably because it's easy for babies to say.
They have replacements for some of these artifacts, like rln for aln (linker), rmac for mac (assembler) or slightly patched GCC 3.4.6 + binutils 2.16.1a for the 68000 CPU, some being adapted from parent forks or related tooling whose source code is available (like a version of mac for the Atari ST).

However, these substitutes usually aren't completely interchangeable with the original tools. It also does not cover some of the more difficult bits to replace, like a toolchain for the custom RISC cores, which have lots of errata that the one toolchain not lost to time doesn't seem to compensate for (http://www.3do.cdinteractive.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=3356...).

While I'm not a member of the Atari Jaguar homebrew community, I'm currently tinkering with an experimental reverse-engineering technique that might be of use to them (https://forums.atariage.com/topic/354341-porting-the-origina...). Basically, I'm developing tooling that allows one to delink executables back into object files. In the near-term this should allow relinking these a.out executables into ELF executables and stave off obsolescence for a while, in the long term this should allow them to decompile/reimplement these object files one at a time until they Ship-of-Thesesus themselves out of trouble.

It's a bit of a side-quest for me since I originally developed that tooling for delinking PlayStation 1 video games in an effort to decompile Tenchu: Stealth Assasins, but these proprietary executables happen to be a fairly decent and well-rounded set of test cases to try it out on.
Networking through grad school is a good option. But there really isn't much I learned in grad school that I'm using in my job and hadn't already learned in undergrad. Grad school seems like a huge waste of time and money (if your company doesn't pay for it).