skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
People don’t understand that “physical activity” is just a part of life itself as primates. Only in modern times have we separated “life” from “physical activity”.
Amazon's ended its periodicals program, and independent publishers are panicking
> That being said, I'm not sure that an API is well-designed if the only way to use it effectively is by forcing you to even know there is an eslint plugin to begin with

I don't really agree with this except to the extent that, sure, it would be ideal for all APIs and indeed the entire syntax of your programming language to be so well-designed that you don't need any lint rules to catch common mistakes. I'd love it if my static type checker could catch most mistakes like this (although the boundary between linting and static type checking is fuzzy).

But in practice, you're almost certainly going to either 1) have a linter or 2) have strong resolve that you will not make any easy mistakes that a linter could catch. And if you're in the second boat, it doesn't make sense to single out this particular easy mistake, given that omitting arguments is always an easy mistake to make in JavaScript.
Can you be more specific which linting rule you're talking about for the sake of readers who may be unaware, and perhaps mention how this completely solves this problem? Because 1. a linting rule does not absolve this from being a footgun and 2. if you're talking about 'exhaustive-deps' there are many cases where following the linter here has caused infinite render loops among newbies across multiple teams I've worked with. Also see this highly contentious thread: https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app/issues/6880
there are millions of short bald guys who are married just in the US.

I can think of, just off the top of my head, like 3+ guys I used to work with.

More like 6 if you include friends and my barber.

the "I need Looksmaxxing" my appearance is everything screams "I am an incel and can only date supermodels, who seem to reject me"
When I was young and learning my trade I had a group of older co-workers who decided they liked me enough to invite me to join their lunch group. It was a very informal mentorship, they showed me the ropes, provided guidance and generally made me better at my job. This was all because they knew me enough and liked me enough to put in the effort, they got little out of it other than enjoying watching another guy come up in our field. Now I'm a grey beard with less than a decade left and I'd like to return the favor but to whom? I don't work in an office and I have no relationship with most of my co-workers, I do my job and they do theirs. Management could force me to mentor one or more of the engineers but that probably wouldn't work out very well for anyone. There's no relationship with my co-workers anymore because we never see each other and while slack and zoom is great for a 20 something it just doesn't work for me and in the end I'm the one with the institutional knowledge that I won't be passing along to the loss of both the employee and the company.
I'm by no means an expert on cars, but my impression is that they're one of the worst cases of a class of product that should be substitutable, but isn't, because there probably is only one or two makes & models that are close to fulfilling one's list of requirements, and if those are not available, it becomes a painful exercise of letting go.

Unless we consider begrudgingly buying an option because you need something to be buying a substitutable good. Which I guess is fair in some sense, but makes it feel like buying things is a loser's game.
"The Germans drew different lessons. Believing that unification had come about as a result of military competence, they mapped the future of the German Empire in terms of military power. Thus, Chrastil concludes, German victory in 1871 became catastrophic not just for Germany but ultimately for the rest of the world."

This.
Let's Read the Turbo Source: What Happens When You Click a Link?
Interesting point - population density when such spheres were being manufactured was low. Which leads to the next idea: when population density increased, spheres were no longer manufactured. Why? Something replaced them. Arrowheads?

We can start to unpick the mystery with insights like that.
OK, here's a non-utilitarian answer: People really like owning and controlling their own stuff. (I suppose you could make that a utilitarian statement, by saying that "really like" means "valuing", but I think it's much deeper than that. It's pretty deep in human nature, from what we observe in almost all societies. So one could say that communism is literally contrary to human nature. You might be able to make it work, but you need different humans than the ones you have.)
The article is talking about socialism. It does everyone a disservice to come in here, blur the lines, and post a trite self-satisfied comment like this.
I'm convinced that the main reasoning behind this is that it implicitly keeps employee retention higher than with WFH, where employees are free to learn skills that are beneficial to THEM in their free time, and interview much more easily for new/better roles.
Biologists have been messing with the console since a long time ago. They figured out what each gene does in large part by turning them off one by one, or occasionally making them run more than they should (overexpression). Even before they had the whole genome, they used random mutagenesis and slowly analyzed what got broken by breeding experiments. With enough data you can even locate it on a chromosome relative to known genes by linkage maps.

The most fun stuff to mess with is of course parts that controls how other stuff works. Figuring out what makes stem cells want to grow into shapes will lead us to more of these control switches.
If you know about the subject, I'd like to hear about capital versus cashflows.
I do work from home but I also go into an office to meet with customers and I otherwise drive on highways on a regular basis. I'm an hour drive into the nearest major city to see a play. If I commuted into my nominal office a few days a week I'm pretty sure my overall risk wouldn't be much increased.
I have friends that have gone Shopify->Deliverr->Flexport. It’s been a real roller coaster for them. Hopefully it settles down a bit.
It's not just about the model, it's about the integration. Copilot is easy to use because it's basically automatic in vscode. So it isn't a 'flow breaker'. That is in some ways its primary benefit: it gives you something similar to searching for the solution a problem without having to leave the editor. (At the loss of being able to see the context of where the solution comes from, of course.)
> citizens have no ability to affect politics.

Theoretically at least you could join the party and become politically active in your local branch, no?
I think so much time is spent on things like the Roman Empire that we never get to details like “the reason the top half of the glass windows in this very classroom swing down and the radiators are hotter than the sun is so that they could ventilate all winter when respiratory diseases were at their peak.”
> You have a choice with that. Corporations cannot stop you from publishing your own blog.

Indeed, in America both myself and Rupert Murdoch are free to start a news media operation. I’m sure the journalistic merits of our respective works (and not how much capital and media connections we each have available to us) will determine our success in the free marketplace of ideas.

Of course state-run media will tend to publish propaganda in support of the government, but media is not a binary choice between Pravda and Fox News/MSNBC. It is naive to think that the current media landscape consists of each individual rationally selecting articles from all available blogs and news sites - we get most of our news from the places that have money to publish/research/advertise their stories, which is almost always (in the U.S.) done by private corporations.

Many articles about current events found on news aggregators such as HN tend to be by these sources not because of some hidden conspiracy but because these are the stories with the most visibility.
You left out the part where they say it IS okay to use it on the backend of a hosted application or service.

The way I read this is that they are reserving their right to build an API product like OpenAI based on this model, and control that particular part of the market. So it can't just be a wrapper putting another brand on it that is open to general purpose use of the model.

But you can build hosted chat-based applications. They just need to be applying the model to some use case.
As someone who used to use React and now has to grapple with an in-house web framework: hooks are right on the money and offer tools
backing some of the best devex in web right now.
Well, the problem is: hot dog cart might be a great business, until you account for all the government regulations, taxes, stupid sanitary requirements, etc. severely limiting your earning potential. Things like that were much easier in late 19th/early 20th century US. Capitalism is a great system, the only thing that can break it is too much government involvement.
If the opposite of "Buy this stock" is "Buy an index" then yeah, kinda!
> Agreed, everyone who complains about dependency arrays almost certainly hasn't used the linting rule.

Which linting rule?

> That being said, I'm not sure that an API is well-designed if the only way to use it effectively is by forcing you to even know there is an eslint plugin to begin with, and then once you do know that, that means now you're being forced to add eslint to your project whether you like it or not. And sometimes eslint just stops working for who knows what reason, I have a developer on my team who's constantly dealing with issues where his eslint/prettier setup isn't running correctly.

Yes, not to mention eslint is slow with large codebases. Fingers crossed for the Rust(?) rewrite.
Remote work from pandemic period is a totally different story. The companies are forced to let people to work remotely because of the covid, not they really want to go fully remote.

My original post was about typical 3 days(hybrid) vs Amazon's 5 days(fully onsite). My stand is that hybrid is fine for certain people and positions if the people think that it's worth it. If you don't like it, that's fine. I never said you have to take non remote positions. I was only commenting on the Amazon's fully onsite issue anyway
Let's just also stipulate that Norman Finkelstein is not a renowned Jewish scholar. He is a profound antisemite whose Jewish ethnicity makes him a favorite prop for neo-nazis to trot out.
Couple more things wget can do that curl can't.

1. wget can resolve onion links. curl can't(yet). You'll get a

curl: (6) Not resolving .onion address (RFC 7686)

2. curl has problems parsing unicode characters

curl -s -A "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0" https://old.reddit.com/r/GonewildAudible/comments/wznkop/f4m_mi_coño_esta_mojada_summer22tomboy/.json

will give you a

{"message": "Bad Request", "error": 400}

wget on the other hand, automatically converts the ñ to UTF-8 hex - %C3%B1 - and resolves the link perfectly.

I've searched the curl manpage and couldn't find a way to solve this. Please help.

I'm having to use `xh --curl` [1] to "fix" the links before I pass them to curl.

[1] https://github.com/ducaale/xh
Wish I could upvote this harder lol. Parents really dont have enough time/energy to do this better than people who are trained in software/legislation. Especially if they have more than 2 kids/are single parents
The hard part of children is the womb and available parents, not creating an embryo. The UK needs to finish their artificial womb work.
I don't think that makes sense. You can just go back and not work. Learn a new skill or something while in the office. You basically fire people who physically can't come back or people who are not afraid of losing their job. You probably don't want to fire based on that.
Did you try Falcon 180B?
The meeting to bring in the relevant stakeholders and discuss that reasoning literally costs more than just fucking buying some cloud space.
Nice, the Nature news article links to the biorxiv version of three papers. The one linked by TFA is Oldak, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.14.544922.
Tourists charged €99 for 'watching the sunset' atop Cliffs of Moher
Mustang: Programs Written Entirely In Rust
Something like this happened to me but I got more and more verification messages for services I do not use too.

I sideloaded an infected app on my phone (Vanced) and it tries to use my phone as a disposable phone number for 2FA. The number was likely sold on the dark web, so bitcoin scammers, catfishers and a few other bad people tried to use it. I even had WhatsApp messages from horny men in my area who clicked ads on porn sites. They were not very bright.

It all failed because I did not let the app read my SMS. The messages slowly stopped coming.

I only figured out by correlating the start of the messages with the app installation date.
Especially consider the need to update your software for NLE is highly selective. H.264 and H.265 were used over the years for LongGOP, while ProRes and DNxHD/DNxHR were all supported a long time ago. There are no reasons to update unless you need latest blackmagic RAW or ProRes RAW, which are well beyond normal consumer realm. AV1 may be a new thing, but that's it.

There are no continuous vital features updates like being able to read newer camera RAW files for ACR. I find a one-time payment much more suitable for FCP.

With LPX and anything remotely in music production area the subscription just seems dumb. Omnisphere, Komplete, FL Studio, Cubase, Pro Tools, Ableton Live were all in the realm for decades, and while subscription did became a thing (especially for very expensive samples like Hollywood, Spitfire, etc.) features in a DAW are sufficient for a long life cycle in production, and mandating a subscription for "keeping latest" just seems odd.
It's exactly that. Jason and DHH have built their entire personal brands on contrarianism. It works for them, but at a certain point it feels inauthentic.
How do you know? My experiences and knowledge of the subject indicate otherwise. I'm not convinced. (btw, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim of the existence of something, as one cannot prove that something doesn't exist)
We pay for pentest reports from reputable providers in range of 1k for those kind of findings.

Security theatre something something…
Both are true. Property taxes haven't been re-assessed since the 90s. A minority of wealthy landowners are subsidized by a much larger group of salaried renters.
Misandry
I've read through the NY state convenience rules. They are written so poorly that Albany, in theory, can tax someone who attends on-site meetings in NY for two days out of the year that otherwise works remotely from Fairbanks, Alaska, which is utterly ridiculous.

At some point I expect SCOTUS will slap that law down based on the Interstate Commerce Clause but the correct challenge has not reached the docket yet. But I also expect that almost everyone that might be affected by this has just worked around the NY state law by now.

But for those of you considering working remotely for a company based in New York state you should be aware of the convenience rules. Based on my reading of them I would recommend against working remotely or ensure that the company helps you comply with the convenience laws so you don't fall afoul of them.
I'm guessing you're just citing what you found in a Google search and have never actually dealt with NY taxes. In reality, NY state demands payment from you if you so much as checked your work email inside JFK while you were waiting for a connecting flight. I know literally dozens of people who can attest to this fact.
Most people have guns, ammunitions, liquor, gas stove and toxic chemicals at home, and nothing happen.
> I don’t have to be Adam Smith or elites to know how lottery winners from low end social strata end up.

Is this actually true or just an appealing stereotype? I have no idea about any studies that looked into this. A quick google brings up this slate article[1] which seems to indicate most lottery winners are doing fine.

[1] https://slate.com/human-interest/2022/07/mega-millions-jackp...
The training process is closely curated, bootstrapped, the bulk data is mixed with whatever manual data you have, and it generally requires tremendous amounts of human input and expertise for the model to be even remotely good. It's definitely not just "feeding the data to the model".
My experiences with jQuery are literally the exact reason why I like React.

I strongly suspect most HNers who are overly critical of React (and/or general web framework complexity) have never had to write and then maintain a large web application in jQuery.
I had an idea once to implement Borges's Library of Babel just like this: all the text is in the URL. With more sophisticated encoding, you can optimize English words. Then hook it up to a "search system" so you can search for your own name, clips of text, etc.

Eventually you'd hit the URL size limit, of course, but maybe we add a layer on top for curators to bundle sets of URLs together to produce larger texts. Maybe add some LLM magic to generate the bundles.

You'd end up with a library that has, not just every book ever written, but every book that could ever be written.

[Just kidding, of course: I know this is like saying that Notepad already has every book in existence--you just have to type them in.]
I stopped reading at "Banks, at their simplest form, take in customers’ deposits and use those deposits (their source of capital) to make loans" which is laughably wrong. The loans make the deposits not the other way round, which is obvious when you stop to think where the deposits must have come from in the first place. Every deposit originates from a loan.
It's the (intentionally, I'd imagine) best answer available.
It shouldn't be even cool to an engineer if you get rid of all the abstraction sauce you need to make this appear halfway elegant on a technical level.

Web search and local search don't even have the same interface: one takes a string and returns a list of web URLs based on a black box algorithm, the other takes a string along with potential other attributes and returns a list of local files that match a fulltext search.

I don't see any meaningful way to calculate a relevance score across both web results and local files.

The only reason you'd want to do this IMO is if you're desperate to get traffic to your search engine.
It's 8 x A100 for inference. Huggingface has a lot more than 8 A100s.
The Plot Against Mercia
As I said. But it’s at least a better starting point to make the top-level goal about outcomes, not money.
I think part of problem is that it's not a pure reduction in casualties, but rather a large reduction in causalities of one kind in exchange for a small increase in casualties of another kind. Which means we end up gravitating to cases where someone would have been alive if not for [New Technology].
Tangential: I’ve recently tried to change my profile picture in Uber and it turned out I can’t - they’re asking me to schedule an appointment at their shop. Out of curiosity I checked - the closest one is exactly 84 kilometers from where I live. Nope, won’t happen. Things are crazy nowadays.
> only talks to women in bars in NYC

> surprised that he only interacts with shallow hoes

Never, not once, had a random woman interested in my IT shit unless they're also in STEM themselves. "Boring IT guy shit" is the correct answer, and then change the subject. If they know anything about it or care, they'll ask.

You probably just boring. Change that.
To be fair I wasn't very clear, but what I meant was like this:

function SomeComponent({ someProp }) {
function doStuff() {
// do stuff
}

useEffect(doStuff, [someProp])
}

This trivial example is easy to read, but as more state and effects get added to a component, it quickly becomes fairly cumbersome to figure out the exact order in which your code runs.
> These definitions leave you with the only alternative being "a different small group of people"

Or the same group of small people with significantly more restrictions and caps.

> it's one or the other, there's a privileged class or there's not.

There doesn't have to be a privileged class in either system.
> Remote work from pandemic period is a totally different story. The companies are forced to let people to work remotely because of the covid, not they really want to go fully remote.

Amazon's stock hit an all time high during this period. They chose to take that arrangement and modify it, now they have worker discontent (and a lower valuation).
None of the reports mention if two stage authentication or any other extra factor authentication that enterprise accounts would be secured with were bypassed too. Am I right to assume that because the attacker had the signing key all of the extra authentication mechanisms that would have been enabled on accounts were bypassed by the attacker (because the attacker could create a token that bypassed all the extra authentication methods)?

And I presume there has been no known dump of e-mails exfiltrated during this attack?
They are already taken non seriously at all.

Security theater industry somehow fares well still.
It's only circular if you assume that "Capital" doesn't have a definition. It does: Capital is resources that can be invested into the generation of more resources. In order to meet that definition, resources need to have a few characteristics: They either need to be tools of production in of thenselves (like a factory, or a hammer), or they need to be able to be turned into tools (say, iron ore), and they need to be possessable (an RF band or an idea or land only becomes capital when a system ensures it can be possessed), and they need to transferrable (your face isn't capital, the rights to your likeness are).

"Private" in this case distinguishes the system from other where, say, only the state can own capital.
I understand why 3 days is needed for certain positions. Even for ICs there are senior techleads who have less coding requirement but more design and pm requirements and they need to juggle projects with multiple groups and the same time. For them frequent communication with large groups of people is probably more efficient when it's done in person
Young’s modulus is the linear relationship between stress and strain in the elastic region, which does not exist for plastic parts (since the relationship is nonlinear and it’s mostly nonelastic aka plastic).
Ever since one acid trip where I had a thought similar to yours, the act of plugging things into an outlet has seemed kind of violent and forced to me. It would be more satisfying if it was more of a mucousy “schloop” feeling rather than the current dry “rrtt” thing. MagSafe ports are a little better though.
Only if you're not smart enough to defeat their monitoring.
> Capitalism is not markets.

Capitalism is markets + the right to private property and gains. It's not a philosophy.

> Liberalism is says nothing about social programs

Social Liberalism does, which is the prevailing Liberal school of thought today.

> Did you read your link to socialism?

ctrl+f "lowest rung"= 0 results.

Redistribution isn't just about "the lowest rung" or most impoverished, social ownership is intended to be utilitarian. Not unlike Liberalism.
Ah, but look around at people pointed at and referred to as Nazis. That's the rub, isn't it?

And if you're advocating punching them, then violence is an inherent part of your ideology.

That's why they call it horseshoe theory.
I have no useful answer for you, but when you allow continuous rotations, doesn't it stop being combinatorics?
Side rant: OneDrive is so much worse than DropBox. But if you’re on MS and use Word or Excel with other people there is no way around OD.

Same with Teams. It’s easily the worst piece of SW on my computer, closely followed by OneDrive.