skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I suspect it's a passion project, or a learning project.

I wrote something similar a few years ago so I could go through the process of making it into the app store. I didn't expect a lot (or any) sales.

(But I probably should have put it up on Hacker News so I could get all kinds of comments like yours.)
Not much room to misunderstand, and if he knows what cracked means what's going on should be obvious.
I think therapy works, but I think other things (like exercise, friendship, and having a good reason to expect good things in the future) usually are much more important, and it's hard for a therapist to help with any of those problems.
What country are you in?
I can help you get an account that works in Canada,USA, and some other countries.
He lost that value a long time ago when he laid off all of the employees and burning out what's left. It's a testament to old Twitter employees' skills that the app lasted this long.

The real question, why did Google Web Services and other cloud providers let Elon not pay them and let the app run for so long? It's clear he isn't going to pay up
I would say before you get a takedown request such platform is infested with malware and e.g. Google blocks the website so any attempt to visit it results in big red warning.

Speaking from experience, I had similar idea for hosting static sites albeit without the ssh model around it.
The example is

> For the last 25 years, engineers have said ‘we can make it secure, or we can let law enforcement have access, but that means the Chinese can get in too” and politicians reply “no, make secure but not for people we like”.

Insecure police departments will inevitably leak the backdoor keys. It's not possible to limit who can use decryption keys based on who they are and not just possession of the keys under our current understanding of how encryption works. If you assume that the police will never leak keys then sure it's easy. But arguing about whether or not social factors like police department computer security is good enough to safely store keys is a technical argument about this technical problem.
Why not just use chatGPT directly?
Email actually has very well thought out authentication mechanisms such that its not unreasonable to expect a domain is not spoofed, and it came from the server it says it came from

but if some baddies have logged into your server and sending messages as you, then DKIM can't save you

so say social media companies want a higher standard of proof that emails are coming from a particular institution, what mechanisms are available that doesn't involve onboarding every individual officer to the subtleties of public key crpyotgraphy?
ha. as my friend says, “as long as it’s a flattering picture of me, snap away!” however, i don’t share the same sentiment.
Oh I know who he's blaming. It's obvious.
From my experience, the people who have therapists tend to either be far from family, not close with family, and/or from a dysfunctional family.

In a statistical sense, the role of the family therapist was probably traditionally filled by women - but now those women have real jobs - and the family doesn't have a part-time therapist as available anymore (on average).

At least in my family - it is astounding the difference between my grandmother and her daughters.

Anecdata of one family. My Grandma was a legendarily empathetic. Maybe no one could fill her shoes?

But it seems like especially tough shoes to fill when you already have a full-time job...
I would still prefer the meeting organizer to write the meeting notes and action items instead of him assuming "my AI" had captured all topics and decisions, and even worse, then expecting me to take on assignments without him ever explicitly requesting such resources...
To anyone considering getting into knife sharpening:

Usability matters more than perfection. If you're the type of person that would only sharpen knives once a year because it takes half hour to set up your sharpening rig and sharpen your knife, get an electric sharpener instead - takes about 15 seconds. Yes, it's not glorious or Instagram-pretty, but it gets the job done well.

For hand sharpening - look up micro-bevels. They speed up sharpening time considerably (still not as fast as electric sharpeners though).
Rolex simply wants to further their control over their brand. There has been a feeling for some time that authorized Rolex retailers, by poor customer service and unauthorized practices have diminished the brand's value. By extending their reach into retail, Rolex can standardize and control customer service, reduce the unwanted stories of customers being treated poorly, and as a side benefit, control the signage, display and presentation at their retailer. It's a smart move.
A lot of what passes for therapy could probably be done cheaper by going to a confessional and telling a priest.

CBT seems to have some scientific research backing it but I’m skeptical.

As they the jokes go most psychologists study it, trying to understand their mental health issues and most studies are done on psychology students students.
IBM simply followed the tradition created by the companies already in the microcomputer market. Apple's documentation, for example, included the full schematics and the source listing for the ROMs:

http://cini.classiccmp.org/pdf/Apple/Apple%20II%20Reference%...

You could get similar documentation for all Radio Shack products and many others.

MITS didn't set out to make their Altair 8800 an "open system". In their case it wouldn't make sense not to have the full documentation for the customers that were building their own machines from kits. But this resulted in clones and in competitors rebranding their "Altair bus" as the S100 (standard 100 pin) bus and making improvements to it as a group resulting in MITS losing control. So IBM should have known what would happen, but probably thought they were too big and important for history to repeat itself.
What OpenAI Really Wants
If future wife requires diamond, another stone is not going to fix root problem you have. Go with someone less materialistic.
I think they do care, it's just not something most people notice until it looks wrong. I'm not a painter-decorator, when I walk into a house I won't notice the paint colour, unless it looks terrible or clashes or something, in which case I probably will notice.

There's a lot of things like that. A classic example I'm very aware of is something called "juice" in game development, which you would never notice whilst playing a game until you play one without it, at which point its immediately obvious.
Correct. It was a hard problem. Thankfully not so hard as to be impossible though.
Any market is shaped by policy. It can be argued that the US health insurance market is not really free in significant ways and set up such that the net result is the mess we see. A government-run institution performing better than the private market is not necessarily a sign that the institution is good, it might just mean that the market is set up in a deficient way.
The difference between a $200 and a $2000 bottle of wine is mostly how expensive the thing you are drinking is. Tons of industries and products work like this. Why would it surprise you that gems are any different?
One of the reasons is that the APA has guidelines that are hostile to a safe therapeutic environment. I've had much better luck working with non-American therapists that aren't subject to the APAs ideology.
Some forms of feedback are fine of course, but complaints about hiring processes, such as "I applied and never heard back from you" can't be assessed properly without more information. Some of those complaints are no doubt accurate (and of course companies should get back to job applicants—it's the least they can do); but it's also clear that some of those complaints are bogus—why? because when people complain on the internet, they often leave out salient details that would completely change the picture if readers knew them.

To take an example from a different domain, HN occasionally gets posts from people complaining that a payment provider has denied service to their business—but such posts usually omit to mention what the business actually is. Often this is because the business is dodgy enough that the community would immediately side with the payment provider if they knew that detail.

The only approach that (partly) works to tell an accurate complaint apart from a bogus one is to have an open community discussion in which the details get hashed out and readers make up their own minds. That works ok when there's a thread dedicated to the process—it may not be the most on-topic thing for HN, but at least people get to ask questions, get more information, and sift through the story. The critical thing—what makes it (partly) work—is that everyone who's interested in the story gets to ask, point things out, etc. (For example, to go back to the payments domain for a minute, HN commenters have learned to respond to such complaints by asking "What's the business?", and if they don't get an answer, they've learned to be a bit more skeptical of the complaint.)

A Who Is Hiring thread is not the place for such a deep dive, for two reasons. First, there isn't the space for it—these threads are their own genre and they're not free-form like regular threads are. If the comments ballooned up with complaints and community adjudication of the complaints, it would make the Who Is Hiring threads a lot less useful.

The second reason is a little deeper: a job ad thread is not a level playing field, because the employee posting the job ad is usually in no position to respond to the complaint against their employer. Often they have no access to the relevant information; and even if they had, they're posting in a public capacity on behalf of their employer, and that places a lot of restrictions on what they're able to say. An asymmetric situation like that doesn't serve the cause of the truth. For the community to evaluate a situation fairly, both sides of the story need a chance to be heard.

For those two reasons, we have a rule disallowing this sort of complaint in Who Is Hiring threads. I guess there's a third reason as well: such posts tend to be repetitive, and therefore tedious, and that quality is the main thing we're trying to avoid on Hacker News. That doesn't mean the complaints aren't important! Obviously they can be quite important because job searching is critical for people and hiring is critical for companies. But HN in general might not be the best place to litigate them, and certainly the Who Is Hiring threads aren't.
There's a war nearby, change some production lines and build APCs instead of butt ugly muscle cars that look like an APC with windows. Company + jobs + pensions saved. Crisis averted. Most of them are going to be destroyed anyway or sit around for a few decades gaining dust and rust save for an annual exercise or two after this is over.
So you're saying, don't even try to do better?
What a moron. I can't wait to read the Isaacson bio though.
deVStudio – Runs VS Code on Android
This is made by the makers of UserLAnd - Run Linux on Android. Looking for early feedback. If you want a promo code (first 500) please email support@userland.tech.
CVEs are not what they once (ever?) where. With the proliferation of automated systems involved with vulnerability management and dependency updates, it’s possible for a single GitHub PR close event to create a CVE for an issue that verifiably, 100% does not actually exist[1].

Interesting times ahead.

1. https://tomforb.es/cve-2022-0329-and-the-problems-with-autom...
I get your reluctance to dive into a new language just for one project. But here's the deal: Haskell's strong type system and emphasis on pure functions can actually make you a better programmer in any language. Its lazy evaluation is a unique feature that optimizes performance, and it's built with concurrency in mind. Plus, in Haskell, you really can't cheat your way out of functional programming. The language enforces it, so the code you write will be functional, unlike in Python where you can mix paradigms. Even if you're a Python devotee, the principles you'll learn from Haskell can offer a new lens for problem-solving. It's not just about learning a new language; it's about broadening your skill set.
At least some did. CD Projekt Red got started as a cracking and translation group. At the time (Poland before the fall of the iron curtain) there wasn't actually anything illegal about what they were doing; copyright wasn't really a concept in their legal system at the time, particularly for software.
I concur. I only use ProtonMail in the browser on mobile devices. Funny how they fixed the 'blank email' bug everywhere but in the app.
The Evolution of Open Source Business Models
Given than fusefs provides FUSE support on BSDs, it seems more than "a bunch of baggage", given how useful it is.
It's been fascinating to watch the trend of therapy explode by orders of magnitude in popularity over the last 3 years.

For anybody else keeping the finger on the pulse of trends through what people put on their online dating profiles, the "I hope you are in therapy" stated expectation went from 0 to every-other-profile almost overnight.

It makes me question how much this is driven by the effectiveness of the therapeutic approach vs what is simply trendy and mimetic among bourgeois urban millennials.
there needs to be consent from the company being probed for vulnerabilities

What is the type of scenario that you have in mind here? Do you mean probing a web service for vulnerabilities, performing security assessments as part of pre-sale publications (think Consumer Reports, Anandtech reviews etc), or performing pen-testing on a device I bought and is now running on my home network? Because you appear to be arguing that I shouldn't be allowed to examine a device I own without explicit manufacturer consent.
The (un)funny thing about CBT is that it is almost indistinguishable from the totalism and thought reform techniques deployed by the Communists in China, as described by Robert Jay Lifton in his work -- Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of "Brainwashing" in China [0].

A read through Wilhelm Reich's earlier work [1] and a look at his fundamental dispute with Freud (i.e. - is depression and anxiety a problem in the individual, or in society, and if it's a problem with society then why adjust the individual instead?) will expose the status quo in psychology as simply a way to maintain exactly that.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_Reform_and_the_Psychol...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_Analysis
Priest and confessional is probably cheapest option still. The things those people have to hear probably matches most therapists.
> Sure .. just as long as crazy assumptons aren't made such as automatically flagging single men, single women or homosexual couples.

I agree completely.
Don't you think it's within the social media companies interest to respond to as few subpeonas as possible i.e. only genuine ones from authorities?

but maybe you're right and this problem won't be solved because the person being harmed has no power and the institution in power sees no harm
You have to admit that's pretty badass, to barf up a star.
Hi and thanks for commenting. My concern with this topic is motivated in part by the AcidRain family of energy infrastructure attacks and the larger questions they raise about infrastructure security. Teardowns on Chinese-sourced equipment have been somewhat worrying as well -- one report I've read highlighted about two dozen versions of SSH in a single base station. Best wishes and good luck.
Show HN: Gamified dog care education – Duolingo for dog care
We are open for business worldwide. Interviewing candidates for a part time role in growth/digital marketing/social media/PR/partnerships. Email us: sales@petlovequiz.com
Last time I worked with Carts, I remember Braintree being good about this

https://developer.paypal.com/braintree/articles/control-pane...
Good to hear. I hope you can find a balance. Mostly just not "clamping" so much, which is maybe the reason for strain.

I try to not clamp and neither lean much on the handlebars. So I have to move my hips and body a bit, but I do see improvement in handling. If I hit a pothole or debris, the bike will autocorrect much better if there's less pressure on the handlebars/front wheel.
This seems like a strange regulation. Companies would simply comply by doing pro forms updates for the sake of updating.

Additionally, the update process itself introduces security vulnerabilities.

An IoT device might have a lifespan of 20 years. Let’s say a company is required to update for a 10 years. For the subsequent 10, that process is nothing more than a vector for malware injection.

The most serious type of vulnerability is an unauthorized, unbounded, write operation.

One of the most secure architectures is “stateless.” That’s where the software is hardcoded into the software. This proposal would outlaw that approach. It’s not for all situations, but it should be seriously considered.

The real solution is to hold companies accountable for vulnerabilities.

I suspect this is better done by the FTC.

Perhaps your time would be better spent fighting DRM on broadcast television, or ensuring cell towers aren’t tracking people, or that phone calls have crypto enabled by default.
I can empathize with this, however, I think it's worth pointing out that the value of therapy does not lie in the insights that are communicated. Even if they weren't in self-help books, you could in theory just go read the textbooks that therapists do.

The value I have found in it is in actually spending time talking about my emotions, with a reasonable human being, and receiving reasonable reactions. It's a chance to build "reps" in emotional intelligence that are otherwise scarcely available in regular life (mine, at least.)

It's like working out. Sure, you can lift buckets of sand in your garage and get strong. People still go to gyms and hire personal trainers.
I agree with almost all of this, but a lot of the people who point loaded guns at their crotches act like normal people at the range or shoot at unsupervised DNR land
> I'm going to go out on a limb and posit that what we need to do to survive on a daily and short-term basis has far outpaced our ability to cope with it.

Our ancestors never had to do so much to just survive. Humans are just not designed for this level of stimulation, keeping track of resumes, jobs, bills, credit scores, investments, children, retirement, mortgages, cars, a pushy manager, performance ratings and who know what else.

Life has become miserable because too much is asked of an individual. It takes immense strength and mental clarity to get rid off all these burdens. The hardest to get rid of is poor quality of jobs.
>-The ability to "turn off" connectivity and retain full local functionality.

>- An industry security certification like UL.

I don't think those should be separated. UL is about safety and, while insecurity is roughly the software equivalent of a device's propensity to suddenly catch fire, reliability is also an important part of safety in all but the most frivolous applications, and local functionality is an important consideration for reliability.
I'd like to believe that a therapist, unlike a good friend, would know the difference between well-meaning advice and good advice. Because I can give the former, but I'm not sure about the latter. A therapist should know better, if only due to the number of times they saw the effects of suggesting A instead of B.
Look at app.QuickType and their abilities
Who would have thought that laying off most of your staff, implementing poorly conceived product changes, and alienating your advertisers with edgy hot takes would cause your company to lose value?
Wow, that's genius. How come they haven't thought of that? Have you tried applying for CEO at BMW?

I'm not sure that's how defense procurement and economics of the defense sector work in peace time(Germany is not at war), but it seems like you have it all figured out.
These are luxury diseases that you’ll only find in super-rich countries.
I have heard that using magnifying glasses or a microscope can help suppress shaking in the hands: it has a weirdly helpful interaction with the hand-eye feedback loop. Dunno if it would work for you, but it might be worth trying?
This will be a completely optional program. And the proposal is that even for participants of the program, they just have to disclose the update period, whatever it may be (could be zero-length).
It definitely will raise eyebrows, but maybe noone will say a thing.
It really depends on the location though.
We are from DuploCloud and hence the following note might be biased. The downside of a pure paas solution like porter, Quovery at al. is that they have a limited scope say kubernetes, pieplines and diagnostics. All of the lower layers of the Devops stack from IAM, networking, AWS services (including non containerized workloads like Lambda, EMR, Airflow etc), scores of compliance and security controls are left out of scope. Then one needs a expert Devops to write boat loads of TF. Our apporoch is of a E2E platform that should do all of what a human devops manually scripts. Thus fundamentally deliver self-service, labor reduction and compliance.
> Note that you can today depend on git repos [..]

Yes! That's what i'm doing and my whole argumentation is that this should be the encouraged default. Because cargo is already well designed and crates.io (or any custom cargo registry) only brings marginal value to it. Let people organize their infrastructure as they wish, it shouldn't be the business of a language implementation or build system.
Unless I'm wrong those are considered Veblen goods. [1]

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/veblen-good.asp
Welcome to the world of Veblen goods: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veblen_good
You raise a good point, and it reminds me of a sort of "Prisoners Dilemma" (sender uses/avoids LLM-verbosification and/or recipient filters all emails through LLM-summarization).

The worst-case scenario is that human communication becomes completely routed through this LLM-in-the-middle.
The emails should just be made public anyway.

They are public servants, yes?

"To serve and to protect."
Since this started, I’ve thought that they should probably be using xenoform instead of terraform (e.g., OpenXenoform and xf command).
> But I don't see how that has anything to do with a private, non-government advocacy group making their feelings known to advertisers. It happens all the time

It might be perfectly fine, but why should the target of this campaign- also a private entity- refrain from denouncing this and retaliating with bad publicity for the involved advocacy group? Twitter/ X lives off ad revenue, and the ADL lives off its reputation of a non-partisan organisation pursuing a laudable cause. If ADL can erode X's advertising revenue, I don't see why X shouldn't fight back by trying to weaken the ADL's reputation, as long as it is done in the open and by legal means.
Yes. And GDP is a rough measurement of how much value is being created, in dollars.
Plenty of people have been socialized to expect certain material things as part of the marriage process. Does it make sense? Probably not. Is it a character flaw? Absolutely not.
It wasn't worth anywhere close to $40 billion to start with to anyone but Musk (and not really to him, either, which is why he tried to run from the contract until it was clear that wouldn’t work.)
Even Firefox does this. Because of something something security.
How Amazon uses chaos engineering to handle 80k requests per second