skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What I mean is that "there's always a loophole" statement is dangerous, because allows corps to squeeze and squeeze loopholes, unless there will be an unnecessarily expensive equipment required to exercise my law to screenshot
> The farmer is always going to have a truck. But it could be an electric truck.

Farm trucks are a pathological case for electrification. They often have fairly extreme range requirements under adverse weather conditions and heavy loads. They spend much of their time far from the electrical grid, never mind a proper charging station. In some regions they have to account for being too far from a normal gas station, which is one of the reason you can buy barrels of fuel to bring with you or an extended tank.

But it doesn't matter because there aren't that many of them. Certainly not something we need to optimize for.
Did he? And we know that wasn't heavily prepared?

Also, Musk is very capabale of doing stupid things. Especially when it comes to social media likes. I mean he spent 44 billion for that same reason...
So he's used it.. once? Or are you saying he uses it exclusively to get around?
> End users are locked down from changing almost anything.

It doesn’t need to be. The domain admin can allow users to change it, or configure sane settings to begin with.
Autotranslation:

> Consumer advocates warn of the return of liability for interference

> Trade and consumer protection groups are sounding the alarm: the draft for a digital services law lacks the clause that sealed the end for WLAN interference liability.

It looks on topic, but post that are not in English are usually ignored or flagged. Do you have a similar report that is in English?
Blatantly labeling a food item with anything other than flavor and nutritional value probably causes it to be seen by people as not being competitive on flavor or nutritional value.
Actually no. Pre war Russian propaganda was 100% sowing doubt, even internally.

However now that they need to motivate ppl to fight it has started to move back to Soviet style propaganda which promotes a consistent false narrative.

Basically ppl who don’t believe anything won’t rebel against you. They also won’t fight for you.
no dust or heat makes me wonder
I use(d) Grammarly to double-check my personal blog posts. A lot of its purely technical catches, like duplicating words, mismatching tenses, mismatching plurals, etc. are great. I usually ignore its style suggestions altogether, especially when I'm deliberately breaking a rule because the "wrong" text reads better.
Yes, and.

Mixing operation of motorized vehicles in the same space with vulnerable humans and their pets is the real problem. Operating them on the sidewalk is an instance of and amplification of the same problem.

I’m wildly sympathetic to the anti-car position, but I’m not at all sympathetic to excusing motor scooters on sidewalks in the interest of advancing that position.
Not my point.

Politicians always push for a scientific consensus they can act on, whether it's there or not.
Because people have been living in houses for millennia and such an idea of privacy would only have emerged in the last few decades.
Nintendo's New Employee Retention Rate Is 98.8% in Japan
So true and traurig.
A human can be held liable for their actions, and as such, the "average person" might exercise an amount of responsibility equal to the risk of liability. Drive slow around schools, but drive like a hooligan around a racetrack. Etc.

A Tesla, or any robot for that matter, cannot be held liable for it's actions.
How to write correct code by construction using the Coq Proof Assistant
It sounds like a highly selective sort to me.

Like, wouldn't be too many deaths and accidents set back the goal? And wouldn't a previously acquired bad reputation slow down adoption when it's finally working?

And why not sacrifice short term gains by having say, LIDAR and better hardware at the start, to have the best performing system as fast as possible, and then gradually trim things down once everything works perfectly?
I agree somewhat but is it any different from professional athletes? They are being paid a hundred million dollars for kicking a ball.
Showed up on web search:
https://www.dw.com/en/pope-francis-calls-us-catholic-church-...

But nowhere to be found on DW's home page.
> How do you know that people are lazy by nature and not because their job sucks?

The two aren't mutually exclusive. I personally wouldn't say humans are lazy, but simply: people avoid doing things they find unenjoyable, but if they must do something unenjoyable they'll find ways to minimize their time spent doing it.

> Of course they have zero incentive to get anything done, they get paid regardless of how well the project gets done.

This makes it sound like freelancers get more work done, not because it's more enjoyable, but because they must to get paid.

> Maybe if they had the guts to leave a paycheck for browsing Reddit and started their own business they would have success too.

For some people, getting paid to browse reddit is one definition of success.

> When I work on my projects I have way more stamina than when I'm doing client work. I kind of have to resist the urge to kill myself all the time instead of doing that boring job and I keep reminding me I'll be able to build a villa with the money.

Huh... After reading this I need to rethink what you are even arguing. I assumed it was that freelancers put in more hours because the nature of their work is more fulfilling. But you're really just saying, yeah humans are lazy to the point of wanting death over client work, but at least with freelance I can frontload the actual number of miserable hours worked, instead of spreading them over 30 years.
Since the vegetarians and vegans can still figure out the meat options contain meat I think it's more of a do not emphasize rather than withhold the information.
The dumb part is their argument.

Imagine factory workers being replaced by replica androids, and the workers are upset because the androids are using their individual “likeness” rather than that the androids are taking their jobs.

They are fighting the wrong fight. The vast majority of actors represented here do not lose anything more than the factory workers under the particular thing they’re fighting against.
You're not wrong, but you're going a bit historical there with DK 64, which came out in the 90s. On top of that, British developers were notorious for picking employees for voice work.

Nintendo still uses internal staff for incidental stuff, but you can see the trend of professionalization. Tears of the Kingdom came out on the same day around the world with a large professional voice cast for every supported language. That's where Nintendo is going.
What do you mean? Making my private content accessible on the public internet is the opposite of control.
You hire people. They automate their own job, you lay them off, you pay their salary as tax anyways. Therefore there's no incentive to rush automation to eliminate workforce. As more and more gets automated, people can work on automating what isn't automated yet, or differently automating what is to make it more efficient.

There's no slackening of the incentive to innovate, just the removal of a tendency of innovation to ine itably lead to centralization of capital
.
Dupe: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37348914>
Typically on HN people talk about whatever they want, no set agenda.
In many countries you can get your learner's at 16, and a full license at 18. Hence 2 years.
I think the mechanics of a scooter are too different to compare to a stick.

I'd really love a mechanics engineer view on this because having a center of gravity up high seems similar to the unsprung mass problem.

It can be stabler for a little bit but become unmanageable. And somehow I wouldn't want to drive nearby "optical illusion". Above 20mph things need to be dead simple, not maybes.
> The thing preventing it right now is that it's illegal

Just like towers (condos or any other kind) are round here.

Your local politicans are elected? So are ours.
Here is the (probably) one of the worst payroll system failure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_pay_system

As far as I know, no one was fired. The Phoenix pay system for the government of Canada is a good example of so many failures. People really need to stop thinking that building systems with 10s of thousands of business rules is « easy ».
Isn’t learning history educational? And yes, some history is horrific but I don’t see the problem with that.

I was in elementary school when we took a field trip to see a ww2 concentration camp.

Was that appropriate for our age? Hard to say. Did I still remember it all these years later? Yes. Was it educational? Also yes.
They aren't heroes in my opinion. A doctor would have a hero moment if they were in the middle of their regular life and someone has a piano fall on their head and they perform some MacGyver-esque surgery and save their lives.

If you clock in at your schedule time, go through your motions, clock out, what you're doing isn't heroing, you're doing your job. This isn't any sort of attack whatsoever on the profession, I have lots of respect for them, but I know plenty of surgeons and they'd all cringe at this hero talk.
Or less judgementally, people think they dislike vegetarian/vegan options more than they actually do.
I’d love to know how you did this.
Valid point, in a logical world. But some 80 year olds are just so hard headed that instead of calling one of their THREE children who work in IT they just head into the closest electronics store and buy the laptop recommended by their favorite sales rep. And then they call us to complain about it.

He would scoff at my suggestion to install anything other than what he's known for 30+ years.
Postgres is also a viable vector store.
This will never work. They are still fucking around changing vehicle configurations, sensor configurations, computers, throwing more compute at it, everything after nearly a decade now. It's a hack job death march, reminiscent of half-assed software crap companies I've worked for, surrounded by hype, marketing and rabid fanboyism. I've never seen customers at this scale who are happy being experimented on like lab rats.

The real problem is that roads are vastly unconstrained systems. An analogy is you can't take a sieve and fill all the holes in it with AI because it has no determinism and you don't know what all the constraints/holes are in the first place. Humans can actually reason in these situations fairly competently, even the stupid ones.

Give up, produce a half decent low price car with basic features that a human drives that frees us from the insane EV pricing jump and perhaps the world will be changed. Self driving cars are not important other than for a few exec egos and companies who want rid of the cost of a human workforce.

This is another fucking race to the bottom and the only innovation is getting people to think it's important.
Damn, did he finally give up? He used to do this since the 90's
We visited Verdun this year, including Forts Vaux and Doaumont. The athmosphere, including the beautiful forest, around the battle fields is special. And outright spooky in the partially flooded forts.

Totally different from the D-Day beaches. The outright slaughter on WW1 battlefields is just incomprehinsible, and it shows at places like Verdun.
Here is their answer to their own question - "What is Raft?"

>Raft is a consensus algorithm that is designed to be easy to understand. It's equivalent to Paxos in fault-tolerance and performance. The difference is that it's decomposed into relatively independent subproblems, and it cleanly addresses all major pieces needed for practical systems. We hope Raft will make consensus available to a wider audience, and that this wider audience will be able to develop a variety of higher quality consensus-based systems than are available today.

After reading that I still have no idea. They are not alone in doing this, but I think its a shame that people don't spend the extra time and effort in properly describing their work.
If you’re dead set on centralising your private keys, I would store them in a password vault (e.g. 1Password has ssh integration, presumably its competitors do as well).

Unless you don’t want to reveal hostnames to Gitlab/Github, it should be fine to have a copy of your .ssh/config there though?
I remember when Tesla demoed FSD and it was all faked. Given the company’s track record of fraud and his personal track record of over promising and under delivering on this very product, why should anyone believe his video is what he says it is?

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/17/tech/tesla-self-driving-video...
Thanks! I'm trying to make xtemplate into a 'Rapid Application Development' RAD tool, as one of the commenters pointed out. lmk if you feel like trying it out; @infogulch everywhere
The Containment of George Kennan (2022)
Another reason for that koala to hate Qantas?
It is also related to Ted Nelson's StretchText (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StretchText). Here is the original note describing it: https://i.imgur.com/jOCOQGI.png. (Reposting from my previous comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14014349.)
I do not understand how a large number of software vendors have
managed to turn "beta testing" into a desirable way to spend
time.

People even compete to be allowed to perform free beta testing.
Great from a business perspective, saves a lot of money on QA.

I prefer to use the software once it has been fully released and
has been out for a while for the vendor to iron out any major issues.

To freely chose to beta test the self-driving feature of a huge automobile
travelling at high speed on public roads (not a test track) is nearly
impossible for me to understand.

Where it the upside to it?
Being able to blog about how you nearly died?

Had it gone a bit farther this would have been a good candidate
for a Darwin award.
Not really. Musk was making this argument. But literally non of the smart analysts that do detailed models of Tesla ever put this in an investment model.

People who don't actually follow Tesla often only hear Elon and a few Tesla superfans and hardcore Tesla haters. In reality there is a lot of space in the middle that is up for debate.

Tesla stock was flying high, stories about self driving were part of that. But it was also a time when all EV companies were way overestimated.

In general, many Tesla were actually sold as appropriating assets. During the supply crisis some used Tesla actual out-priced new ones. But that wasn't based on self-driving.
I agree. A drone that stays over someone else's private property is their problem. If it is operated from neighboring property as a device to gather information about me when I am on my property then that changes everything. When it is purposely guided over mine then I should have the option to handle it in any way I deem appropriate. Looking into my back yard, which is enclosed by a fence and is therefore not open for public viewing should be a violation of my privacy.
I think Lucene might be using Pinecone in the backend or something.
We've passed the point we can blame Elon Musk for this: We need to be asking why the federal government has been completely absent in putting a stop to it. Tesla's marketing around their cruise control is getting people killed.

The government needs to give Tesla a week to remove all Autopilot and FSD terms from their products or recall the entirety of the product line. People who paid extra for this unlock should get full refunds for it.

My Kia can provide an amount of self-steering in cruise control which is truly impressive and smoothes the driving experience, but nobody sells it as driving itself, much less charges an extra ten grand for the privilege.
It would be nice if they had letter codes for meats like they do for allergens. I generally avoid red meat, but not for any ideological reasons.
With Tesla, everyone can have the experience of being a driving instructor, but unfortunately not everyone is good at it. IMHO it takes even more attention to supervise it than just being in control all the time, since taking over when it tries to do something stupid is the most difficult part.

For this reason, I always stay clear of Teslas on the road.
> The menu items would need to be descriptive about the ingredients used for someone who is actually vegetarian or vegan to know if the ingredients used truly is or not then.

“this study did not find that vegetarians and vegans were more likely to choose items with meat when the labels were removed, indicating that removing labels did not negatively impact them.”

Of course, the quote doesn’t address the stricter requirements of vegans vs. vegetarians.
How to Use Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Rag) with Llama 2
Researchers are typically not great at software engineering
It is in industry, but you may be shocked if you read “research code”
Okay this is probably something that needs a very high level of stability. But many apps/websites arent about life and death. If hackernews goes down no one dies. If a bridge goes down people might die. That is why civil engineering is more regulated (and work takes more time than if it wasnt).
This will probably be something that the reviewers bring up. Arxiv papers haven't been peer reviewed yet!
All the times I've watched a short, it's been an accident.
im looking into the idea of setting up a DVD iso of win to boot and run from read only device.

the problem likely comes from externals being pushed in on request from OS.

if the cruftcraft originates from a dll, that means a lot more work
And with vegan food that generally is the case, hence the amount of processing, added sugars, seed oils, etc.
Age we live in
But why would you look at Toyota? They're not exactly Tesla's main competitor when it comes to BEVs, they have been betting on hybrids and Hydrogen for way too long and only belatedly they've released a BEV.

Other manufacturers are much closer to Tesla in terms of range, quality and numbers. In fact, in quality some already surpass Tesla. Numbers aren't really there yet, but Tesla's market share is now about double that of VW and VW does a lot more than just BEVs.
Because firing people at random isn't likely to prevent future errors.

Errors of this magnitude are either a symptom of some deep-running problem with an organization, or (much less likely) freak accidents.

In the former case, random firings aren't very likely to improve the organization; in the latter case, you'd be firing the people best qualified to do a post-mortem and making sure the same or a similar failure never happens again.
Research code has different values. If you throw away 90% of the code you used after a week you'd code differently too!

The tricky part is that 10% of your code will become the basis of your thesis / postdoc;)
Stop. Driving. That. Shit.
... This isn't about the game, it's about psychedelics, the drugs.
Speak softly and carry big balls.
-Howler Roosevelt
The study didn’t survey how much the participants ended up liking the food they chose.
Most people don't care about the things you do, so do the things you care about and enjoy without requiring others to care.
Yes. And don't ban the sale of new gas-powered cars, as some states have pledged to do in the future.
What part of this is random? Did you push prod code that contributed? You’re fired.

The rest of your post is more of the same “it can’t possibly have been me!” This isn’t a the website went down problem. People didn’t get paid here.
Made a similar comment as this. If it is for a wider audience etc you would think it would be beneficial to explain it in a way that the wider audience understands.
It's also often sexual or suggestive content.

inb4 it's just showing me what I like. In icognito mode go to YouTube and watch a single video that might suggest you are an 18-45 year old male, and then look at your suggested shorts.
> Most of that subsidization has already happened and will be locked in place for some time

Yes An no.

Yes it is already built.

No because there is a lot that can be done to improve existing infrastructure.

Public transport can be retro fitted rail corridors, dedicated bus lanes, bike only paths, walking infrastructure

Zoning can achieve a lot too. Allowing more commercial pepperpotted amongst residential

You do have to defeat many vested interests, but unless we defeat them they will burn the world for profit, so we must defeat them

A real test for democracy
Call of Duty is using AI now too [1].

I think it's interesting to wonder what Valve would say about games using AI exclusively server side. They cannot control (or know) what technologies a developer uses on their personal game servers.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37370934
AFAIR, SVMs have one optimal solution, achievable analytically. NN can get stuck in local optima.

If a transformer is a SVM, could we simply extract it out and optimise the hyperplane like for any SVM?
Is it possible to file a FOIA to get the domains and build a uncensored version?
Because that's what I could afford on my then still meager salary. 45 / hour for lessons, 45 lessons, one every two weeks. In Europe the examinations are a bit more strict than in the United States and at the time you could only start your lessons when you were 18.
I'd say Postgres + pgvector is even simpler if you're doing small scale document search (eg. internal knowledge bases, documentation sources, codebase indexing, etc.).

pgvector is even supported out of the box on Azure and AWS RDS.

Just spin up a docker container [1], add a vector column to your table and you're ready for embedding search.

[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/ankane/pgvector

If you're starting out with a prototype - do yourself a favour, steer clear of the chromadb examples with langchain. In fact steer clear of langchain in general :) Just go for OpenAI API and PostgreSQL+PGVector - you'll have to do some boilerplate - but the stuff in langchain is just terrible, you'll have to rewrite it and do the boilerplate at some point anyway and this stack is super simple to deploy.
I would not hate them if they also appeared as regular videos. But they do not. So sometimes you even have massive discoverably problems wit them.
Its very hard to invest in these things. Most advanced nuclear is not public. Trains are usually part of really old really large companies. And with bikes there are just so many competitors its hard to have any understanding in that market.

As a society, of course we should invest in bikes, nuclear and trains.

But as an investor, EV and batteries make more sense.

The thing is, we don't need new technology to solve our problems. Trains and nuclear work fine with 1980s technology and supply chains.

However transforming the car industry to electric is a gigantic growth opportunity.
> how they make cities less inhabitable

Everyone says they would love to live in a walkable city, but for some reason, at least in the US, the biggest gainers in population over the recent decades have been all automobile-centric cities (which are probably more accurately described as a large patchwork of suburbs). NYC would have shrunk due to out-migration to other places if it wasn't for foreign in-migration[0]. Chicago lost people 15 out of the last 20 years[1].

[0]: https://www.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/pdf/about/dcp-p...

[1]: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-met-census-chicago-me...