> The video mentions an exception for educational content. Fine, but who decides what is educational? What about some of the truly horrific WW2 content. Is that educational? Hard to blame YouTube for being very cautious here.

Educational? Absolutely.

I'm a parent of teenagers and to be clear, when they were younger, I was careful about "truly horrific WW2 content." The goal is to educate, not present a child who is incapable of understanding/rationalizing those atrocities with the graphic reality of what took place in a manner that they're not going to understand but -- instead -- will likely cause psychological issues and irrational fear at a time when they're not capable of integrating that into their view of the world.

That said, I can't find a word strong enough for how I feel about censoring "the true nature of the evil that took place" or restricting access to this information in any way. I remember when Schindler's List was played -- completely uncensored -- on broadcast network television in the US (I believe it was NBC at the time). I can't think of another drama or content of any kind that received an MPAA "R" rating ever being aired to the general public without editing and little more than a regular warning about the sensitivity of the content. It's a tough movie to watch and certainly not meant for all ages but I think the broadcaster and the regulatory bodies rightly recognized that there were two choices: don't do it at all - or - do it completely.

My experience in this area is not one of "a child of Jewish parents who survived/were victims of the holocaust" but as "the kid who saw some truly horrific WW2 content" in middle school. My eighth-grade English teacher was Jewish. There is a Holocaust Memorial Center/Museum about an hour from our school. Our teacher set up transportation and granted students a few extra credit points for joining in on an after-school trip.

That experience changed my life and looking back on it, today, I'm so glad I had this teacher. She did this every year. It was not without controversy among the parents of students.

For the men[0] who attended public middle school in America, think back to 8th grade. Outside of a serious injury, an 8th grade boy does not cry ... EVER ... in front of classmates as doing so would basically destroy your life[1]. Now, imagine any experience that could cause every boy to not just "openly cry" but outright sob in a parking lot and then on and off for an hours-long drive home in a yellow school bus[2]. And then the stories throughout the school the next day none of us could help talking about the holocaust, the experience we had, and not one of us left out the bus-ride home.

By the way ... the kids who took advantage of the extra credit? A few good students and all of the bullies (some needed the points to avoid the dreaded "summer school"); including the one white redneck who called the only black kid in our school the "N-Word." Sobbing. I had a history class with the redneck in 11th grade. He talked about his experience, about how is parents are racist and about how that experience changed him.

It breaks you.

It's necessary.

[0] Maybe things are different, now, but where I attended middle school ... the girls were basically all crying at one point or another during any given week. It wasn't a pleasant place most of the time.

[1] We had a kid in school who cried in class. This poor kid was then beaten up weekly -- it would have been more frequently if both parties to any fight weren't "suspended for a week" regardless of who started the fight. He attended a private school the following year.

[2] The drive there was the typical 8th grade "herding cats", random "F-Bombs" and general misbehavior.