skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Show HN: Open-Source Admin Panel for Supabase
Supaboard: An intuitive admin panel tailored for Supabase.

Features:
Dashboards: Easily visualize your data.
User Segmentation: Segment and manage your users effectively.

Problem We're Solving: Building dashboards directly from your database can be tedious and far from enjoyable. Supaboard aims to simplify this process.

Why Supaboard?
Seamless integration with Supabase and PostgreSQL.

Built with NextJS, Tailwind, and Resend.

Stage: We're currently at the MVP stage and are eager to gather feedback.

What's Next?
We plan on introducing data editing capabilities and trigger automation in the upcoming releases.

Feedback: We'd love to hear your thoughts. Feel free to spin up the app and add issues on GitHub. You can also join our Discord here - https://discord.com/invite/mh45XDfED4
Cancers can grow so slow though that they're not becoming an issue, before the person dies of something else. Also it takes a while to notice cancer and around 50% of the population at some point get cancer that is noticed and warrants treatment.
AI Startups Create Digital Demand for Anguilla's Website Domain Name
I feel like one of the biggest issues with Wayland is that the 'mob energy' of the people who really thought who could slay the Microsoft Dragon, and make 'Year of the Linux Desktop' happen just isn't there anymore.

These people made things like drawing tablet support on X, as well as had the power of fixing all the little weird use cases you'd need for a truly large user base.

It's really funny that open source is bigger than ever, but Desktop Linux development has ground to a halt, and is in the hands of skeleton crews, and stuffy bureaucrats who enforce edicts like 'you aren't allowed to theme your operating system' and 'you must use the text editor built by our specific denomination' on a platform that's supposed to be characterized by being 'free as in speech'.
I think it must be a typo. because 10.2.0.0/8 is not a valid subnet mask. The largest subnet you can make starting with 10.2.0.0 is 10.2.0.0/15.
Which begs the idea: how would one successfully pollute insurance data. I am now a non-smoking vegan ironman.
Why would an alternative github frontend be in any way related to a git-compatible VCS?
https://archive.ph/dzC5J
I would like to publish a small local community newspaper

So publish one.

Themes, backends, etc. don't matter at least until you start publishing.

And maybe not even then.

Content is what matters.

Look at Craigslist.

Good luck.
I’m guessing it’s a typo, but maybe it was a 10.0.0.0-10.255.255.255 subnet with EC2-Classic machines allocating purely from 10.2.0.0-10.2.255.255, and 10.x.0.0-10.x.255.255 was allocated for other services?
Is it really that hard to have a smartphone and just not install addictive/time-wasting apps on it?

I think my daily average screen time is 10 minutes (according to Digital Wellbeing), with less than 10 unlocks. Advantage being that I'm available/able to call somebody in an emergency or I can use the utilities on it when required (maps, translation).
What puzzles me (being a casual observer) is that post-modern commercialism does not seem to affect all design domains equally. I would say that e.g. current automobile design seems to have still fairly identifiable style propositions (whether I like them being a different matter).
Lately, they tend to gather in threads about Github.
The support got better: downloading is good. It should be usable now, but there are basic things that are not supported, like searching for something or finding a path. I typically don’t need to search: I know where for things are, but there aren't other ways to mark something on the map: favorites and stars don’t appear consistently, and pointing at things is completely useless when logged-in and disabled when off-line. So much of it feels like it was never tested.

My main issue is that there should be a way to say, “Keep this journey on screen until I explicitly delete it, with a confirmation model.” I’m assuming that’s what “Pin it” is meant to do, but in practice, I occasionally see the path I last searched when I reopen my phone and map; I never see a pinned journey again if anything happens: rotate the phone, a quick switch to another app, the screen goes dark…
> and I believe its maintainer who says that there are issues with Wayland which make support infeasible.

* Where did they say that?

* What are the issues?

I am trying to narrow down exactly what the issues are. Too much of the conversation is 'something' is broken in Wayland because of 'something'.
Even snap/flatpak frequently give flat-out full filesystem access, so the desktop is already insecure as heck and the security advantages are all theoretical.

It's like nitpicking what lock the door has when the window is left wide open.
I wonder what that means for vegan people taking "large spectrum" vitamin supplements, e.g. veg one ?
They're not faceless but they are demons.
Hah, that breed of management predates the JS world of crap. My current manager sees no problem in the job postings ridiculously listing every single language/platform we have worked with, even 30 year old 8086 projects, even when any new hire will most likely be touching none of that and will be writing some mundane C for an ARM.

"It doesn't hurt to list everything!" - Him

"Why the fuck would someone want to apply to what looks like an absolute hell-hole?" - Me

"But they should apply anyway if they know some of it!" - Him

No shit the quality of applicants is sometimes not the greatest
This headline was ridiculous to parse
And what are you doing with these files?
Payroll employment increases by 187,000 in August; unemployment rises to 3.8%
I've not had any issues with screen sharing in, like, 3 years.

The problem is that people use video chat clients by vendors that don't give a crap about Linux.
Not in the US, but yeah, I may be able to get a phone and an address through some 3rd party service(s), but I'm not sure it's worth the overhead, especially if it's just to pass the verification (and potentially users would not be able to really get in touch through them).
If you want a laugh, check out the comment section on that page. The Chinese, Biden, Clinton, and Big Pharma are all in cahoots.

https://studyfinds.org/dietary-supplements-help-tumors/?show...
Your quote only states what the knot is suitable for, not what it isn't suitable for.
You are right. The /8 is 10.0.0.0/8.

I guess it's not a typo, but a weird way to write 10.0.0.0/8 excluding 10.1.0.0/16 .
* What is your WM?

* Have they posted what is blocking them? Besides a lack of hands on keyboards?

I am trying to narrow down exactly what the issues are. Too much of the conversation is 'something' is broken in Wayland because of 'something'.
You are not your technology.
Of course, but then that includes the decision that the danger is low or acceptable for that kind of approach. That decision isn't usually up to the vendor, though.
Skepticism as Cambodia expands protected areas by more than a million hectares
A History of Cigarette Sales and Lung Cancer Deaths in the US
I used data from the WHO Mortality Database and the International Mortality And Smoking Statistics to create this annotated chart showing important events in the history of smoking in US.

It took some time to research the whole timeline, and it was shocking to see some of this data. The average adult was smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day in 1960!

The annotations are interactive, so if you hover them you'll see more context about the events.

I also built the tool to make this visualization: https://www.contextualize.ai
Vim in Browser
Now you can use Vim in Browser using Browser Terminals with Gitpod
It's obvious LLM tripe when you click into the article and it begins with several worthless paragraphs describing why someone would be interested in the topic and how things can sometimes go wrong...

Yes, I already knew that. That's why I'm here.

It might be an attempt to copy customer service 'empathy' but it has the opposite effect: angering me because my time is wasted with this crap, and I have to scroll several screens to find what I need.
> Or to put it simply: using copyrighted material to create a model would NOT be considered fair use.

The more I think about it, the more something along these lines seems like it might be the right way to think about it.

When you play a DVD, for example, you copy the bits off the DVD, into the memory of your DVD player, and onto your screen; this is all explicitly considered "fair use" copying. But if you then copied those fair-use bits off the screen onto a thousand other screens, that violates copyright.

When you, as the human watch the DVD, bits of it get copied into your brain; but you don't then copy the bits of your brain to millions of other people -- they each have to make their own copy.

We could make the law for LLMs follow a similar logic: That having an LLM watch a video or read a text is similar to having a DVD player read a DVD or a web browser copy information from a website. It's good for that limited use case, but the resulting copy cannot be copied again without a license.

This would allow (say) researchers, or even individuals, to do their own training and so on without a license; but when anyone wanted to create something that they wanted to scale up, they'd have to get licenses for everything.

That would fundamentally keep things balanced as they are now with creators and other creators. The big problem isn't that a handful of other creators may be copying their style; that growth in competition is limiting because of the expense of duplication. It's that millions of electronic engines can copy their style.
Some comments here, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31532199
Once you've won the lottery, the odds of you having won the lottery is 1 no matter how small they were before the draw.

So, no, in other words, you can't draw that conclusion. Consider that in any instance where bottlenecks led to extinction we couldn't be here to discuss it, and so the only possibilities is that we won the lottery, whatever the odds were.
A car that is easy to steal is not a problem if there's no motivation to steal it. That's what I was alluding to with the last sentence of my post. This is a standard example of thinking that societal problems are best solved by technology, and all that does is drive us further into corporate dystopia.
This was a great post. I never really thought that much about why I found LPC so good as a starter language, but the "become" method explains it. I found it so natural--I want this to be this, but different, and wow, there it is, cool.

Every time I started making an effort to duplicate the LPMUD experience with whatever, I ended up in some kind of inheritance hell, and this explains that as well.

You've given me quite a lot to think about, and I appreciate it.

(I remember the editing nightmare as well. I had to use computer lab computers, so I did a lot of my work with paper and pencil outside of the lab. That probably did a lot to teach me as well, but even so, the editing part was just awful. The LPMUD I was on got a better editor, something a lot closer to vi, at some point, which made things so much nicer.)
> (somehow people think it needs to be profitable like a business rather than a public service like a school)

If more then half the voting population thinks transit needs to be profitable or at least break even, then they will.

How will you convince others to take it seriously if your opposed to a clear majority?
Generalizing: the technical merits of <whatever> are mostly irrelevant. People use software- or any other tool- to solve actual problems that they have, not because they are prettier technically.

For example, I have been using Pipewire for a while now, because I have to use a USB sound card intermittently. I don't think it is bad, but I wish I did not have to switch card so I could use ALSA directly. I don't care if PW is technically "superior", for me ALSA worked and I could get perfect audio even if the computer mostly hanged.

I use XCFE because I need to get stuff done and XFCE does not change the UI or move buttons around. It does not support wayland. I don't have time to fiddle with config files or to use a DE that churns the UI on each release.

The articles arguing for the technical superiority of <whatever> always sound like they are scorning the user for not recognizing the obvious superiority of the new thing. Almost like they considered anyone who does not adopt the new system stupid.
I could not get Teams to even install on Xorg. At the time, screen sharing did not work in the browser.

Thankfully, my employer uses Google Meet for most of the meetings.
There are a lot of antisocial scenarios in that "Improv" book.
I can’t edit comment now. Not sure why some readers perceived my tone as negative. This is a neutral view and am just explaining why React server side is getting adoption and how this is being driven by the business side of things.
For PRs reviewable.io is what I’d like to use instead of github, but while understandable the giant button it puts on the PRs makes it difficult to use as a personal secret frontend without company buy-in.

Shame, because just the tracking of comments which doesn’t suck would be a boon, to see nothing of seeing what’s actually changed since the last review beyond “this file has changed”
It worked for me, but I had to disable adblockers.
So it's just a grudge against Microsoft then? That's not something I'll sign up for, thanks. You either believe in the concepts of not using personal data - for everyone - or you're selling something.
The base unit is indeed the kilogram, see https://www.bipm.org/en/measurement-units/si-base-units.
Resend founder here... this looks great! Congrats on the launch
> Author at first glance appears as just a user and developer on Linux, in fact they are a full blown Fedora-GNOME-Wayland follower and what I read was a Fedora advertising piece.

I'm assuming you're talking about [0], but I can't for the life of me figure out why you say this. It doesn't mention Fedora once!

> Since the inception of systemd (but this trend is older than systemd, take for example Ulrich Drepper's work on glibc) I tend to notice a pattern, and they are the same as the Apple fanboy stereotype (an endangered specie nowadays).

There's an insinuation here that should be spelled out rather than being made via oblique references to existing stereotypes. What exactly is the pattern you've noticed?

[0] https://orowith2os.gitlab.io/posts/wayland-breaks-your-bad-s...
Please help the guy before he gets too far along. Some of us might have to work with him.

Seriously though, I saw someone described as a 22 yr old software engineer in an article. There is a better term: "Software Engineering Apprentice"
That’s a perfect example, they said “during a thunderstorm” does that image look like it’s in a thunderstorm? Sure, the output of the prompt relates to what was said, but they influenced the output rather than controlled it.

Further, it’s well known that simply telling an artist what you want even including quite detailed descriptions isn’t enough to get copyright over the resulting image.
You can. But you can’t download a large region like a whole state which makes long road trips a pain.

Apple Maps is even worse because it has no offline mode at all.
> it's a front business for some kind of organized crime or offshore criminal enterprise.

Just click on Become a tester (top right) and you might find out!
Working hard: writing a script to detect when the website goes live.

Working smart: bring the office manager a pastry, ask them about their day, and drop hints about how excited you are for the tickets this year.
Hey, I just switched from Linux to MacOS and I wondered how to best set up a work environment on MacOS.
I don't really want to use brew as the sandboxing on MacOS seems to be much worse than I expected it to be e.g. as far as I see you can only prevent the access of $HOME/Desktop, $HOME/Documents and $HOME/Downloads.
I found out that using Canonical Multipass allows you to easily set up ubuntu VMs and this I think it is a good way to create a working environment for development and of course by using it one can improve the sandboxing as everything is executed inside a vm.

-------

Now to come to the point your OrbStack seems to be really similar to Canonical Multipass,
so I wondered how they do they compare to each other?
Why should I prefer to use OrbStack over Canonical Multipass (besides the possibility of being able to run other distributions than ubuntu)?
X lets me log into a machine multiple times simultaneously, with each login having its own, independently operating desktop. Wayland doesn't support this (or didn't the last time I checked). VNC does something entirely different from this -- it just shares an existing desktop remotely rather than providing a unique independent desktop (complete with different resolutions and such, if you like).

So the effect is a bit like VNC in that you can remotely access a desktop, but the desktop you see is not a copy of the one being actually displayed on the machine's monitor. It's entirely its own thing, only visible to that particular login.
Asking builders to ONLY use maximally permissive licenses is equivalent to telling people never to release anything they're not ok with being used in every possible way. On a practical level this would massively chill research, as most builders and engineers I know give significant consideration to the impact of their work. On a personal level, it's objectifying: "Give me the code and don't make me consider your intentions in creating it."

You can't collaborate and live in a world free of others' value judgements, which are implicit in how they spend their time and what research / code / weights they choose to share. "Ethical" licenses at least make those value judgements explicit, and allow communities of builders with compatible values to organize and share.
Insurance companies get these information from more direct sources. For example how you drive your car is sourced straight from the car manufacturers. And they pay big time for it. I can confirm this at least for one large automotive company that I cannot mention because of legal reasons, but they were founded by one infamous failed artist.
Hillingar: MirageOS Unikernels on NixOS
https://patcher.xyz/home

Patcher.xyz is a tool for Eurorack enthusiasts, improving modular synth management with intuitive signal flow visualization and a comprehensive platform for visual planning, researching, and sharing of patch ideas and modules.
This could easily be automated and the results published.
The combination of storage/retrieval/calculation, executed close to the actual data, is what gives 20x advantage.

CPU cache is hard-to-believe fast, see:

https://stratoflow.com/latency-numbers-every-java-developer-...
It doesn't exclude 10.1.0.0/16, or any of the rest of 10/8.
Looked awesome until I saw there's no satellite imagery, I cannot get lost in the middle of the mountains with so little reference points :(
For one thing, Wayland is a protocol, not a specific piece of software. But mostly, that progress has been non-linear. A ton of it is not about writing code, or even about Wayland itself; much of it tied into the modernization of the Linux and general open source graphics ecosystem, moving it away from being oriented around X.org specifically and implementing modern features like generic buffer management and kernel modesetting. A lot of setbacks have been simply waiting on NVIDIA to support these modern facilities well in their still-very-popular proprietary drivers.

HDR support has been in the works for years. Why? Well, nothing terribly specific to do with Wayland: there has been a ridiculously deep dive into the entire space of color management, wide-gamut colorspaces, etc. to try to build HDR protocols that don't merely just get things out the door, but ideally support current and future use cases for the foreseeable future, have good backwards compatibility and handling of unaware apps, etc. These things are non-trivial and can't be solved by writing code or staring at GDB. (Not to mention there are few drivers that can currently support this, so it's also a bit of a chicken and egg problem.)

That is to say, Wayland is a lot less of a software problem than it is a design and social problem. And as you can probably see, ultimately, Wayland will be nobody's favorite, but hopefully with time, it can at least be everybody's favorite.
But that's not the paradigm unfolding here. The reckless drivers will shun self driving because they want to show off and have fun. The drunk driver part could be reduced after sufficient rollout, but we'll have to see how that plays out - the people whonaleays use it would use it when drinking too, but you'll still have people going "I'm fine to drive" and not using it if it's not habit.
If they're trying to experiment for real, it seems like there are some pretty obvious experimental controls that should be used which I don't see discussed.

The control plants should have a non-electrical-conducting wire planted in a similar manner. And in fact, another control should use a copper wire that is cut in various places to interrupt the circuit (and reconnected to be rigid with a non-conducting material)

Without those controls, the effect could be simply a chemical interaction with metal as others here are suggesting. Or even just an effect from how the plant is potted with a wire placed in the pot. Maybe the wire just adds air or makes it easier for the roots to grow or something who knows. Interesting.
Is there someway to lock North so that it doesn't try to keep rotating so "helpfully" ?
ex-maintainer of gothub, github changed their UI to make it require JS on the directory view route which meant we have to move from scraping to iirc fetching the data from a json endpoint or something.
>> We don't prove things to someone. Proofs just are.

I think you need to do a bit of reading, to see what others have said on this subject, because you seem convinced you have the right attitude and the right frame of mind- but you only manage to trip yourself into making absurd statements like the one above. Proofs just are? Where?

I suggest you start here:

https://www.cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/BLOGPAPERS/social.pdf

And here, for a bit more context:

https://m-cacm.acm.org/magazines/2021/7/253448-program-verif...
There's a video on Broadcast of Russ Grandinetti emceeing an all hands, and he opens with stats from the Wallet incident. It is hilarious, folks at Amazon should watch it.
> I would recognize this place as distinct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salk_Institute_for_Biological_...

It's distinctly... hideous. It looks like a prison block, not a place to encourage human happiness.

> I guess this is a good as place as any to mention that Corbusier railed against the metric system as anti-human. The reasoning was that human spaces should be defined through human proportions not power of 10 proportioning.

That is a silly argument, nothing about the metric system requires you to have power-of-10 proportions in your construction, any more than we have power-of-12 proportions in U.S. construction just because we use feet and inches.
You're right. It's not capped. I misread the docs:
https://developers.cloudflare.com/email-routing/limits

Will update. Thanks for pointing that out.
What would really help is getting cyclists to obey the rules of the road. Where I love, by far the vast majority:
-Don't signal
-Run red lights
-Don't stop for pedestrians
Isn't that because laws relating to physical harm already exist and are well-established? There's not really much legal regulation yet in terms of specific AI-driven harms. We're probably yet still to find out all the ways in which it can be abused.
Where did you get that number? Only from the limited test scope of SF taxis? Or is this fromba more comprehensive testing?