skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not at all.

For instance, in the forests around where I live, there's very high lead levels in certain brooks and ground water reservoirs because of an old shooting range out there where no one ever bothered to clean up the slugs left behind.
Again, a government claiming they have one doesn't mean it's possible.
Employment contracts can govern firing. You can have a contract that says can only be fired for cause and get one month of notice for other dismissals.

Actual employment contracts are rare in the US. I think because don't want legal hassle for most employees, but executives and other important employees have contracts.

Other countries have contracts for every employee. I assume they use a standard contract for most employees, and that the laws limit the scope.
Success would be the number in the USA moving in the right direction (down) which it is not as it is currently rising versus other wealthy nations such as France.

Success could have USA/Canada/[insert other poorly faring nation] looking more like the low casualty numbers of other wealthy nations (eg. Norway) as well.

Honestly no death is a pretty good goal. Cynically one could say it's not achievable but trying is nonetheless worth while. In my jurisdiction in Canada I don't see the government even lifting a finger to implement the lowest hanging fruit of policies that would move the needle in the right direction, such is the status quo and politicization of the traffic safety issue. They're not even trying.

Efforts to implement various traffic safety concepts well used elsewhere in safer jurisdictions would be politically attacked here I'm quite sure.
Analysis of RAR Exploit Files (CVE-2023-38831)
Energy usage is far less with an airship
That is not what descriptivism means.
is there any regret from choosing Java for Db development and need to work around this and likely many other issues?
Zachary's has been employee-owned for 20 years:

> Zachary’s was founded in 1983 by Zach Zachowski and Barbara Gabel. Our employee ownership program began in 2003 via an ESOP (Employee Stock Ownership Plan). Through the vision of our founders, Zachary’s is now a 100% employee owned company.

https://zacharys.com/about-us/our-people/

Also, the specifics of the relationship between Cheeseboard and Arizmendi are interesting: https://www.sfweekly.com/dining/arizmendi-bakery-s-bread-bas...
Did actually switch to that. Surprisingly still a lot less performant than the Fortran code, but at least workable.
I don't think that is true in the United States. The Federal Arbitration Act applies nationwide, and it explicitly preempts state law.

If you think that I am wrong, please explain why.

(You are right that you "can sue regardless of outcome," but only in the sense that anyone can sue anyone for anything. If you enter into an agreement to arbitrate disputes, the outcome of that arbitration is generally binding.)
But, in order to generate the vectors, I understand that it's necessary to use the OpenAI's Embeddings API, which would grant OpenAI access to all client data at the time of vector creation. Is this understanding correct? Or is there a solution for creating high-quality (semantic) embeddings, similar to OpenAI's, but in a private cloud/on premises environment?
I don't remember reading it but from the ToC & glimpsing at some examples/exercises, it definitely fits in the "Tutorials" category I was thinking of.

It's always delightful to see competent authors demonstrate how much sophistication is achievable in about 100 lines of simple code, by comparison with the "the Dog class inherits from the Animal class" type of examples, or "real-life" codebases. This book is definitely in the former category.

> I dearly wish there'd be more books like it for other languages.

This all reminds me of a well-known regular expression matcher[0], in about 30 lines of C, featured in "The Practice of Programming"[1].

More generally, even without dedicated books, there are common simple-but-sophisticated type of programs that are great to get to know a language, once you have basic programming skills: standard UNIX tools (cat(1), grep(1), etc.), λ-calculus interpreter, LISP interpreter, raytracer, etc. One can often find online versions serving as "solutions."

[0]: https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr09/cos333/be...

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Practice_of_Programming
Not arguing that at all. I fully agree. There are a lot of smaller startups that fail to get past the “tribe” level due to founder’s syndrome though, among many other factors. It just reminded me of that right off the bat.
As a side note, if your security relies on you typing things into your terminal, you're doing it wrong. AWS even makes you check a box when generating creds that basically says "I understand the way I'm doing this is insecure" when generating creds that will be used that way.
> The vaccines' ability to reduce transmission was never demonstrated in any rigorous controlled trial at all.

Ok, so you’re presumably referring to this[1]? _Because manufacturers weren’t required to prove a reduction in transmissibility_, only safety and _efficacy_, and conflating transmissibility with effectiveness is misleading. An honest and more important question would be why did governments more or less call the crisis a wrap despite shitty immunization rates (at least in the US) and data that despite a significant and desirable impact on hospitalizations and mortality, transmissibility was still a problem[2] particularly with omicron? Or whether the vaccine technology or policy can keep up with variants today or tomorrow[3]? But a blanket statement like “no public health benefit whatsoever” is absurd.

> Almost no one except those in very high risk groups takes them anymore.

I don’t know what you’re getting at, here.

> People lost valuable careers

And people lost valuable lives. Including my mother in law who was not completely vaccinated when her husband brought it home. And my great uncle who was exposed in nursing care at a place that refused mandates. And my coworker’s brother who was forced to work despite his coworkers all being sick on the job. And so on, if we’re gonna start trading anecdotes.

> poured his heart and soul into caring for old folks in an assisted living facility

I’m sorry, am I to infer that he lost his job because he wouldn’t/couldn’t vaccinate while working with high risk people? Because, based on what I just said about my uncle, barking up the wrong tree for sympathy.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-pfizer-vaccine-tra...

[2] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3...

[3] https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/01/23/1150032...
> Perhaps, in no way does that justify a SWAT team invading your home,

A separate claim against excessive force, would be the proper response. The circumstance surrounding the arrest is incidental to the ruling.

> wrongfully arresting you and threatening you by up to 15 years in prison. Especially when the police officers know full well that the charges will be dismissed...

None of this was decided, as you claim. The suit had enough merit to go in front of a judge. I don't think it's justice, as it stands. Stating that the local police are acting unlawfully (with lethal force haha?), as a prank, is dangerous. You cannot convince me otherwise.
Yeah, one of the problems with combat is that it's unpredictable. Over much of the last 20 years, we (American troops) rarely had the initiative. Instead we sat, drove, or walked around essentially waiting to get attacked. Deliberate raids were done almost exclusively by a small cadre of Special Operations folks. So the choice was to wear hearing protection all the time, which seems unreasonable[1], or not be wearing it at all when a rocket or mortar randomly impacted or a car bomb exploded nearby or a fight broke out.

Of course, I'd also bet that most people didn't have their hearing damaged "in combat" because most people didn't see combat, or certainly didn't see much of it. I would bet that most damage was done on live-fire ranges in training, where we have whole days of rounds popping off, or working around aircraft, where there's no excuse for not wearing hearing protection.

[1] Although we eventually mandated eye protection whenever people were outdoors in Afghanistan. Getting everyone to comply with that policy, as a leader, was hard.
I recall Larry saying the key visual aspect is the `\` (I don't recall him mentioning the `/`) because `[\` visually echoes the typical shape of results:

.say for [\**] 2,3,4

4 # 4
81 # 3 ** 4
2417851639229258349412352 # 2 ** 3 ** 4
Sparks such as from damaged electronics are hot by the way, hence their ability to ignite flammable gases (unlike, evidently, bullets).

Why are you worried about microwaves, or a flaming gas bag during a war? Rockets seem to supersede those concerns entirely. Or the much more valuable infrastructure targets that would also be vulnerable if a craft like this was vulnerable.

Re freak storm; then it catches fire, like many other things that get struck by lightning.
Most people aren't squeezing it enough. They aren't putting it into their ear deep enough. And they aren't doing it fast enough, which causes it to be too big by the time they try to put it in deep enough.

With guys I can tell them that what they've done isn't good enough, and show them again on mine, explain why each step is important again, and they'll do it right.

With women I've found that they're annoyed I'm nitpicking their work or something. I go about it nicely, and eventually get them to do it better but still not really correctly. I'm at a sample size of atleast 6-7 women, atleast 10 men.

Either I'm picking dating partners really poorly, or there's is a real problem with women not being able to take ANY criticism these days.
That’s why it’s a theory and not a law. You can attempt the same management game and get wildly different results depending on the team, the ask, the tenure, you, the company, you name it. Often what works one place, doesn’t work elsewhere. Not because they lack the understanding but because of Conway’s law.
Here are some links around security:

https://graphweaver.com/docs/adding-local-authentication

https://graphweaver.com/docs/implementing-authorization

https://graphweaver.com/docs/column-level-security

We have deployed Graphweaver using serverless and lambda be interesting to see how we could convert it to multi-tenant.
> Sidebar because Washington Post; We lived in Washington for a few years. WA has particularly onerous requirements around education in general when compared to the rest of the country. I'd go as far as to say that they're completely bonkers.

Despite the location of WaPo's current owner, it's not named for Washington state.
It's the unintended consequences of good intentions. The belief is that the criminal justice system has been historically racist against certain minority groups. Once you've been to prison, it becomes dramatically harder to get a job and rent. So by being soft on crime they are righting a "wrong".

Noble intentions but it ultimate creates injustice for victims of the crime. It also promotes petty and organized crime. It also creates a cycle. Soft on crime cause a crime wave caused by social justice DAs. Voters get pissed and then only vote for Tough on Crime candidates. Tough on Crime candidates crack down on crime creating a sense of injustice. The sense of injustice pisses off Voters and they vote for Social Justice candidates who are soft on crime and the cycle repeats.
We appreciate all the hard work that Hasura has done to make GraphQL a main stream technology.
OP is missing “common enterprise” part of definition, which covers commodities. Security futures are securities (jointly managed by SEC and CFTC), commodity futures are not (as they are a derivative on a non-security). The main inconsistency is that bank loans are not securities.
I'm not a lawyer, so I'm pretty sure what I'm about to say wouldn't hold up in a court of law, but if you claim your system is 100% secure, then someone hacks it, I think by definition your are allowed to be there and not subject to the CFAA. In a 100% secure system you can't get into anything you're not allowed to, so if you're accessing something, you by definition, are allowed to.

We all here no, there is no such thing as something 100% secure, but if you're gonna go making wild claim, you should have to stand by them.
Indeed, there are even substantial youtube results at this point:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=tesla+phantom+b...
I think I might be a bit of an outlier on this, but I struggle to see the value of imposing an embargo date in a security disclosure unless it's sent to a large institution that is used to a formal process like that. In most cases, if you're trying to communicate to someone that you've found a vulnerability under the pretense that you're doing it for the greater good, why begin by the relationship with a deadline before you "go public?" Wouldn't that be something you do later on if it appears that they're just blowing you off and won't do anything about it?

I don't think this applies to the reporter in this case, but it does seem like there's a bit of a trend in security research lately to capitalize on the publicity of finding a vulnerability for one's own personal branding. That feels a bit disingenuous. Not that the appropriate response would be to threaten someone with legal action.
They're about to elect a guy who wants to do that, so you can see the technique still works.

(And he dresses like a 60s BBC presenter.)
You’re quite correct. I tend to forget this point, because, to me, there isn’t much difference.
Another love letter to Rust is always welcome. I'm extremely pleased to see another compiled language that makes developers so excited to write code. I do think that it's entirely possible, though, that the warts that Rust does have will start to surface in time. There are no silver bullets.
As portrayed in the story he has an amazing ability to raise money for the searches. It reminds me a lot of influencers, and is possibly easier than getting academic funding for astronomy. It seems like he turned from hard science when his mother died around 2019.
Thanks this is what we have on filters so far:

https://graphweaver.com/docs/filters-and-operators

The aggregates package looks very interesting, we would love to see something similar for Graphweaver.
You can probably do multi-day flights with these things.
I was caught up in the scale mentality and corrected by a friend who is an excellent CFO.

We looked at the finances for our company, and the way he laid it out was that we only need a very few number of customers, relative to market size, to be profitable. That's default alive. Ignore growth beyond that number, just get to that number.

Then look at growth past that.

I had modelled growth directly, and because we're in subscription hardware, there is a scaling cost. If you want to add more customers, you have to keep building more hardware, which introduces a cost.

My takeaway when forecasting is figure out your default alive state and how to get there. Once you're there, then you can look at growth.

Another way to look at it is your company is like a person dying in a hospital, and you're the doctor. You're not going to give them a work-out program and tell them to go to crossfit to get big and strong, you're going to figure out how you can keep them alive and get them out of the hospital. Once they are well, then you can get into the strength (building) stuff.

Everyday until you are profitable, your company is dying. So what are you doing to save it?
Best way of doing this I have found is using separate browser profiles.

So i have one primary profile logged in normally and a separate tab which i turn off chat history.

So now I get best of both worlds
can you briefly explain the vulnerability here. I'm having difficulty understanding as all I see is him recalling already previously recorded chat history of his own session. thanks.
There was no shipping to US. Entered email to be notified when US shipping was available. A few minutes later, it was added.
Anecdote: None of my conservative-leaning acquaintances believe that Climate Change is even a top-20 problem, let alone something that requires urgent nationwide or worldwide action. I believe the filter bubble is real.
https://nandgame.com/
All hail the oracle KPIs and OKRs to save the organization and steer us towards redemption…
Exactly. Why would a drug dealer do such a thing?
Yeah, I had the same reaction. It's hard to understand what he's actually trying to say (I watched it a couple of times), but my best guess is that he thinks "malicious" means something else. EDIT: reading the other comments, I think he meant something more like "subversive." Not sure, but maybe.

Mitchell's been out for a while now, and overall it seems like Hashicorp is enshittifying right on the expected schedule. However, with regard to this particular video, I think the guy just misspoke or got confused.
Totally true, but controllers are relatively interchangeable for these types of motors. A BLDC motor like almost all of the e-bike manufacturers have settled on can be controlled by any BLDC controller.

If manufacturer X goes belly up and I need a new controller for my Manufacturer X bike, I can use one from manufacturer Y. Of course I might need to replace the controls, but If I can access the DC power source, and the three windings on the motor, I can make that motor spin with a variety of available controllers.

The same is true for a lot of bike parts; If a fancy click shift derailleur kicks the bucket after manufacturer support ends, you can get a different one. You may have to replace the handlebar controls, but the whole bike isn't bricked by any means.
Most sea-level-rise visualisers are looking at the next 50--75 years, through about 2100 CE.

A total melting of Antarctica is possible, but would take a minimum of 500 years, and quite possibly much longer (thousands of years), though major thresholds such as critical ice shelves melting (and causing sea-level rises of 3+ metres) could occur within decades.

<https://www.discovermagazine.com/environment/will-antarctica...>

<https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/antar...>
Sentence-Bert is at least as good as OpenAI embeddings. But I think more importantly Azure OpenAI model api is already soc2 and hipaa compliant.
Family businesses are common and can be classified as worker-owned.
> don't think they're quite HIPAA-compliant yet

OpenAI offers baa to select customers.
Product Management by Walking Around
> Further, if you do pick your doctor based on the fact that they will give you the treatment you want…

Isn’t this how the opioid epidemic started? Going to doctors that would prescribe you OxyContin because you hurt your finger? Or back? Or knee? Or ego?
Cheeseboard in Berkeley has been a successful co-op since 1971: https://cheeseboardcollective.coop/

I always enjoy these kinds of articles - "Could this radical new way of doing things ever succeed?" where the "radical new way" has a history going back to before the Reagan revolution. We're a really kind of unimaginative people when it comes to talking about how one arranges things in society.
Yes, you're wrong. UAVs have crossed the Atlantic:

https://barnardmicrosystems.com/UAV/milestones/atlantic_cros...
https://archive.is/zunoj
When switching from Windows to OS X eons ago, there were no hurdles or no need to "become proficient". No diving into config files or terminal to make things work. Polished OS and software, that you could use uninterrupted from start to finish when doing professional work, without being a programmer.

I can use MacOS without knowing what a path update or a linker path is, and it can do every and any advanced thing a computer is capable of without me having to learn that. The developer having to go through hell to release software for MacOS is one person who will suffer for the benefit of thousands, instead of thousands suffering for the benefit of nobody.

Linux should come with a big sticker "Do not use if you're not a developer", because that's basically the answer to any complaint about the OS. Of course nobody is responsible, because it's OSS and just floating out there, everybody is a volounteer. But where are the people to say "Hey, let's integrate and make a great experience and test with real life users and real life work flows, and then sell it"?

I would have gladly pay for a Linux solution like that if it existed. Why is MacOS the only option for non-developers? People who make some PDFs, read and write e-mails, make invoices and graphics, make presentations and use advanced calendars. I want to do that natively on a machine and have everything integrated, like Mac does with Spotlight and such. Linux people tell me I should use web services for all that, but then there's no integration.

Since it's OSS, nobody has a right to complain, and that's fine. I just think OSS programmers could be less shy. Instead of releasing something half-assed for other devs to use, why not go the extra mile and deliver something that's complete and usable for non-devs and then charge for it? We'd gladly pay!
One aspect of working in a big company is figuring out where all the bits of specialized knowledge live, and what the company-specific processes are for getting things done. One use case for an internal chatGPT is essentially a 100% available mentor inside the company.
ZeroWater hover filters bacteria, virus and even heavy metals so I would guess that it's better than this solution.
Although you have to change the filters regulary
It's too bad you're being downvoted, because you are more right than wrong. My listening of it is the same as yours. he wasn't calling the practice malicious towards the community itself; in fact it's SOP. he clearly (?) meant it was malicious (his own self-amused take on it, not "evil" malicious) towards the 4 targets that mattered. the success as a product required such "maliciousness" towards those 4 targets. not too unlike states in the USA needing to individually legalize marijuana before it would be considered at all federally.

I do find the HN title truthy. I think I did read into the title what the author was intending, ie to be clickbaity what with the new licensing.

where you're wrong is saying that this being 4 months old isn't relevant to the license change. he/hashicorp didn't suddenly come up with the new license 2 weeks ago and then made it happen. it's something you think about for awhile, certainly at least over 2 quarters of missed growth for your own cloud product. so what he said in public 4 months ago is very relevant.
It sounds effective, but not effective at avoiding accidents.
There is no significant amount of atmospheric helium. It's not something that can captured.

Our helium supplies come from natural gas wells. In some areas the natural gas contains enough helium to be worth separating and storing.
Unpacking the MOVEit Breach: Statistics and Analysis
Also like… what sort of dairy industry would we have otherwise?

The US is right next door to… everywhere here. Anything we can do, they can _probably_ do cheaper. Do we want access to basic staples to be at the whim of US policy and production?

I know we’re basically joined at the hip anyway (our economy is basically as a cheaper source of manufacturing and services for the US… and resource extraction for the US), but if we want to keep up the idea of being a separate nation it’s probably good we can at least provide basic staples for our own populace.