skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
None of what you posted has been settled by any court.

It is all a hypothetical issue that has not been enforced as of yet.
This seems intentionally naïve about game design? Game designers aren't idiots, games are designed to give you a pleasant challenge that ramps up at a satisfying level and feels fair and rewarding to the participants as they become more and more expert. It's actually a great set of ideas to reference if you're constructing a society.
What legal precedent? The existing legal precedent that satire is okay?
What part of 64.2005 excludes the opt-out consent? I read the whole thing. Please quote exactly.
> Notably Stack Overflow's license is Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike, which I believe very people actually realize when copying snippets from there.

A lot of the snippets would not meet the standard for copyrightable code, though. At least that’s my understanding as non-lawyer.
People like to own things. It's the entire point of tokens. They enable one (in the optimal scenario, which exists for some but not all tokens) to own digital things in the same way you might own a hammer. You can transfer it, sell it, use it as your company logo or whatever else you want. And all of those rights are transferred alongside the token.

In this case a new company could support those tokens, but not without the owner's permission. So they could not make the skins available for free, even if they wanted to. It's kind of akin to how when you post on this site, what you post is actually legally copyrighted by you. The reason HN is able to publish it is because in the terms you agreed to, there is a clause where you license your text to them for display, and much more. But you could sue HNClone.com for copyright infringement if they chose to publish your text, without your (or YCombinator's - due to the extremely permissive license we grant them) permission.
Coincidentally, I was just experimenting with this paper on Claude. It seems pretty good. It's basically just a matter of demonstrating an in-context example of the reasoning you want it to use. You can probably get even better results by providing more than one example that are dissimilar. I'm surprised nobody has published a method just like this already.

Another in-context method I use is to give the LLM like 3 examples of inputs with ideal outputs and ask it to return me an instruction (or directive) that, if included in the inputs would help it generate those outputs. I used it to test LSAT logical reasoning questions and, despite the instruction just seeming like very basic instructions, it no doubt produced more accurate results when the instruction was included.
Profit isn’t the only indicator of success for a company like this. If they can break even while paying generous wages and providing value to their community, that’s still a success.
Fake Call Centre Busted: Scammers Made Rs 40 Lakh a Day by Cheating Americans
Related. I built karpathy’s llama2.c (https://github.com/karpathy/llama2.c) without modifications to WASM and run it in the browser. It was a fun exercise to directly compare native vs. Web perf. Getting 80% of native performance on my M1 Macbook Air and haven’t spent anytime optimizing the WASM side.

Demo: https://diegomarcos.com/llama2.c-web/

Code:
https://github.com/dmarcos/llama2.c-web
I knew her mostly from Twitch; and I didn't know her well, but she made a strong impression on me with her evident humanitarian concern for people -- all people, but marginalized persons is who she championed. (Non-marginalized persons don't need it as much, I guess.)
With SO you also have no guarantee that the person has the license to put that snippet. Even that could have been copied from somewhere else.
A customer was scanning for and banning SO, if that was the only determined source.
Lots of experience meeting such folks for several decades, since 1993, to be more precisely.

Lots of Usenet discussions on the matter, and other places.
What, the part in your link that clearly states:

These ice ages are triggered and ended by slow changes in the Earth’s orbit.

How, exactly, does that invalidate the insulative properties of the atmosphere also playing a minor role:

But changing atmospheric concentrations of CO2 also plays a key role in driving both cooling during the onset of ice ages and warming at their end.

Even the primary article discussing the orbital parameters embraces the physical fact that multiple factors are at play, some playing a larger part than others.
I LOVED the multiplayer in this game. Such a shame there’s no active servers anymore
Why you might not want to publicly self-host a Wikipedia clone
single-click out-out: http://g.co/fi/cpni-opt-out
This tracks with how I've seen "normal" languages converge on similar, flawed imitations of better type systems through tools and repurposed syntax. Thank you for confirming.

Do you have any recommendations or warnings regarding general languages which reach in the opposite direction? Reason[1] and F#[2] are both examples: they attach pre-existing ecosystems and compile-for-$PLATFORM tools to OCaml-like typing.

OCaml itself is also intriguing. However, I'm concerned that suggesting it for non-personal projects will go over poorly. The "GPL" in its standard library's LGPL license may scare people despite both the linking exception and Jane Street's MIT alternative.

1. https://reasonml.github.io/

2. https://fsharp.org/
It's interesting, because there is indeed a system in the EU known as carbon allowances. While everyone and their dog can buy offsets, allowances exist in the EU and California (I think?) which are a legal mandate that firms must purchase which are necessary to pollute. There's even tradeable products based on this, and the market seems healthy enough. Offsets are definitely a scam, but I'd love to hear anyone else's opinion on allowances.

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-...

Allowances

https://sparkchange.io/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SparkChang...

Guide on allowances from a firm that sells a physically backed allowances product
You use more than one services from Google. You have to have a Google account before you sign up with Fi. Google is allowed to use opt-out.

§ 64.2005 Use of customer proprietary network information without customer approval.

(1) If a telecommunications carrier provides different categories of service, and a customer subscribes to more than one category of service offered by the carrier, the carrier is permitted to share CPNI among the carrier's affiliated entities that provide a service offering to the customer.
That's quite interesting. I hadn't thought of sparsity in the weights as a way to compress models, although this is an obvious opportunity in retrospect! I started doing some digging and found https://github.com/SqueezeAILab/SqueezeLLM, although I'm sure there's newer work on this idea.
They opened a Whole Foods in a location that has been problematic for at least 50 years and then complain about all the crime in the area. Whatever…
"Best Places to Work in 2023"

1. Home
> All that tells me is the creator is overly ambitious for their own good and possibly naive, which I hardly classify as a sin.

Does the fact that he earns money off of Patreon by overpromising all the impossible features change your perspective on the matter?
They would most likely "burn" them which means giving control, transferring ownership, of those NFTs to a wallet address that no one controls which means they are out of circulation.

I assume they see using a standard NFT contract which doesn't have any way of taking control of those NFTs once ownership is to that burner address. It would be impossible.
Via TinyGo.
> We designed LFortran to first "raise" the AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) to ASR (Abstract Semantic Representation) …

I’ve actually never heard of an ASR before… sounds very interesting! Do you happen to have any resources I can read about this?
What sort of experience did you have with fortran that led you to feel this way?
My point is how do you imagine that software will require 200 million people after it becomes more efficient due to AI? As a field becomes more efficient, unless demand increases, labor decreases. My question is, why would demand for human software labor increase? Not saying it won't happen, but I'd like to know what you're speculating will happen that will lead to that change, even if it's hard to pin down anything specific.
It's kinda fun, like ironing laundry, but I lost count of levels and they were getting longer, but not particularly harder. The biggest challenge is that I can't use the whole screen area to make inner space.
A more interesting question is how did the Earth come out of the multiple Snowball episodes - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_Earth
Always take anything a recruiter says with several large grains of salt.
Got a link to the registration form? Would like to learn more.
Are there any 4K digital signage screens as high-quality as some of these OLED smart TVs?
*GTX 1650* prefill: 5.2211 tokens/sec, decoding: 0.4233 tokens/sec
Toyota to restart Japan production on Wednesday after system failure
A brilliant account of the history of Olivetti. I've owned Olivetti equipment but much of the info in is doco was new to me.
A quick introduction to CSS scope
§ 64.2007 (b): Except for use and disclosure of CPNI that is permitted without customer approval under § 64.2005, or that is described in this paragraph, or as otherwise provided in section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, a telecommunications carrier may only use, disclose, or permit access to its customer's individually identifiable CPNI subject to opt-in approval.

§ 64.2005 (a): Any telecommunications carrier may use, disclose, or permit access to CPNI for the purpose of providing or marketing service offerings among the categories of service (i.e., local, interexchange, and CMRS) to which the customer already subscribes from the same carrier, without customer approval.

Today's email: Fi may wish to provide you with additional information about products, services, and offers from our Alphabet affiliates, including Google LLC, that aren’t among the category of services you’re already purchasing from us

Google plans to advertise outside of the user's existing service category. § 64.2005 says that with opt-out consent, they can only do this within the existing service category. Since it doesn't fall under a § 64.2005 exemption, § 64.2007 (b) says that this requires opt-in approval.
San Francisco has no real say in setting of property taxes due to prop 13, passed way back in the 1970s.
Haha well, it's no secret that the books are free.

Instapaper users pay to read free articles from the internet in a way that fits into their lives better. Same concept here.
I would love to pick your brain if you have some time. Recently founded robotics company trying to navigate predictable success.
> at Amazon

As to the matter of remote in general, I'll go back to the office once they stop putting said offices downtown in expensive cities where I can't afford to buy anything worth the hassle in a >60km/1h commute radius despite being a relatively high earner in this country. For reference, I'm about 65km out of town right now (straight line on the highway), commute downtown would take over 1h15 on a good day, and in the area, I could maybe afford a condo, or an old bungalow with an unfinished basement that needs tons of renos.

Or once nobody wants to pay me for it - which doesn't seem to be a problem yet.
C can be as good as Fortran if make sure to declare pointers "restrict". That is a C feature added in C99 though. For Fortran it has always been the default.

For a long time Fortran was actually unbeatable and C did not suffice to specify all possible uses of assembly...
>I'd be very surprised if google's legal thinks this is actually consent or ok. I think most likely they said it probably wouldn't stand up to challenge and the McKinsey types who run google decided they probably wouldn't be challenged and it was worth the risk.

many of (ex)googler posts mention that legal needs to sign off on everything and looped into everything and they find it frustrating and slowing things down

change of such proportions can't be executed without involvement of multiple legal departments that both approved this decision and scrutinized every letter of this letter.

edit: from cpni itself " Use of opt-out and opt-in approval processes. A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or opt-in approval, use its customer's individually identifiable CPNI for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer. A telecommunications carrier may, subject to opt-out approval or opt-in approval, disclose its customer's individually identifiable CPNI, for the purpose of marketing communications-related services to that customer, to its agents and its affiliates that provide communications-related services. A telecommunications carrier may also permit such persons or entities to obtain access to such CPNI for such purposes."

or in general 64.2007 and 64.2008 describe that it's ok
Discussed earlier:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37301728

(44 points/4 hours ago/88 comments)
The Verge interviewed Alan Yeung (a former Foxconn executive who was in charge of the Wisconsin project).

Very interesting interview. If he's to be believed, Foxconn dropped the project because they didn't like that Evers won the election. Or, at least, that's what he implied.

https://www.theverge.com/23030465/foxconn-lcd-factory-wiscon...
The Parapsychological Association
Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37301728
Computer scientists develop open-source tool for dramatically speeding up Python
> Jassy made the comments during a meeting earlier this month during which he expressed frustration over the fact that some employees were not taking the return-to-office mandate seriously, according to the news site Insider, which obtained a recording of the CEO’s comments.

God that must hurt. He probably spent the most productive and energetic parts of his life sacrificing to become the CEO of Amazon, one of the few trillion dollar companies to ever exist, only to find out that the peons don't take him seriously.

That's some incredible impotence for a CEO. It's probably not going to work out for him.
That’s exactly what I am saying. It’s not a technical problem, it’s an incentive problem and the entire industry has no incentive to adopt a the technical solution these people are parroting to investors.
I would not take that for granted tbh.
Some of the studies do try and control for the type of business, and the effect still seems to come through. Feel free to click through the sources - that's why I provided the Wikipedia link, because I was too lazy to copy all of their sources into my comment! ;)
Unloading code and resources is easy — you already have them on the disk. Unloading runtime state though, that's the hard part. I've never used classic Mac OS when it was current, much less haven't developed for it, so no idea how often, if at all, apps used temporary files to work on more data than can fit in memory.
Skiff Whitepaper [pdf]
In absolute terms? None obviously, but Margaret Court still has one more win in a fewer years.
Based on the original version is http://planarity.net by @tantalor
It just all seems so very fragile. It would be very easy for institutional culture to slip, or for whatever the restaurant equivalent of technical debt is to accumulate.

You see the same thing with a lot of non-profits - they mean well, but they send so much of their funding right back out the door - and the first unexpected expense ruins them.
Working a 4 day week isn't mentioned in the article - maybe the position you were approached for was special?

...but I would not be at all surprised if the requirement to be in the office was prorated too.

In other words, if you work 5 days a week (and that's probably the vast majority of employees, so generalising for an article like this is reasonable), you need to be in 3 days, but it you work 4 you might only need to be in 2.

...so I don't think the job you were approached for contradicts the position put forward in the article?
Thanks a lot for this ! I was looking for the equivalent of WebLLM that runs on CPU only.
Let the chaos begin!!
It seems naively obvious to me that a(b(x)) is more complex than b(x). Practically tautology.
Do you have evidence to back up that claim? I would imagine that only a minority of coops are actually founded by existing workers, and the majority would be new companies - certainly this is the experience I've had with worker coops near me. But it would be interesting if that wasn't the case.

EDIT: the France study is particularly interesting because they specifically talk about this as a potential reason for the surprising longevity, but then point out that "the overwhelming majority of cooperatives are created from scratch, and hence this explanation remains incomplete".
Do you think that someone less ethically minded could have resolved the issue more simply by redirecting their landing page to a warning that the site was insecure and shutting it down incurring near zero personal risk of retaliation and letting people make an informed choice about continuing to use the site.

This is wholly and obviously illegal but so is the described ethical hacking. You have adopted a complex nuanced strategy to minimize harm to all parties. This is great morally but as far as I can tell its only meaningful legally insofar as it makes folks less likely to go after you nothing about it makes your obviously illegal actions legal so if you are going to openly flout the law it makes sense to put less of a target on your back while you are breaking the law.
Interested. Source to read?

Thank you.
You’re welcome. Any feedback and contributions super appreciated
EVs still pollute.
The NBA bans the use of steroids. One could argue that this regulation benefits only those unable or unwilling to risk their health for the sake of competition, or one could argue that focusing on traditional athleticism, whether through practice or genetics, makes for a more fun and entertaining game while facilitating the overall welfare of participants.

Unlike basketball, the stock market happens to be a game with extraordinarily significant consequences, not just for players but for society at large, and it just so happens that society has a lot more to gain from a stock market where traders spend less time competing on speed of execution and more time competing on quality of information. Similarly, there exist many valuable alternative use cases for the real estate, electromagnetic spectrum, and other fixed-supply resources consumed by HFT that would likely contribute more to overall human welfare.

No matter how you spin it, better rules make for a better game.
It's the same effect.

If you want pain meds, I'm sure it's easy at any of those "pain management clinics" I see advertised.

If you call a few doctors and ask "Does your practice handle worms? I'm worried I might have worms," you'll have at least some of them say "absolutely, all the time, come right in".

If they want a happy customer and they know your expectations and they know the risk of dewormer is low, then they'll probably go along with it to make you a recurring ~~customer~~ patient.

You might not even know you've accidentally guided the doctor in that direction.
(1) I use a dedicated Google account for Fi, which does not subscribe to other services.

(2) Notwithstanding (1), this is not what the regulation contemplates a "category of service" to be. It is contemplating categories of telephony services, as indicated by "(i.e., local, interexchange, and CMRS)"
I launched my new startup as a cryptocurrency which uses profits to buy-back (and burn) tokens. That way everyone in the community has an incentive to drive profitability as it directly determines the market price of tokens. If people don't like where things are going, they can just dump the token, nobody is locked in for any period of time, everyone can see how the tokens are allocated and all individual trades are public (though pseudo-anonymous) on our community DEX. I launched it last week and raised about $1000. One entire THOUSAND dollars! Anyway in spite of all the psyops and gov officials conspiring against this asset class, I find this model far superior than the contrived VC model which makes all participants feel like they're playing a very long game of musical chairs on a global scale... No thank you. Not that I could even get my foot in the door in the first place. That model is not just flawed, it's literally impossible.

Unfortunately I can't promote it to US citizens due to regulatory environment so I can't discuss it here.
He interviews fantastic minds, and also clowns dressed up as intellectuals. Jay Shetty and the MindValley guy to name a few.
> You cannot remove hallucinations

What makes you sure that will hold for the next 5 years as tech improves?

> It will probably be 5 years before we can even make enough GPUs to support every company having an OpenAI scale model they can build & run

Not every company needs its own monster model, the point is OpenAI type companies will build the base model and other companies will fork their own versions

>Large context windows come with their own problems and there are other papers that show the agent pyramids are fools errand (the "liar" checks the "liar" issue)

I looked up agent pyramids and "liar" checks the "liar" issue and found nothing. Could you link those papers you're referencing?

I don't imagine jobs are just going to "disappear", what I do imagine is that gradually senior devs will offload more and more of their work to internal AI models. Big companies like Google will have the best, so they'll signal how things will change for the rest. As the models improve, the chance of any task a model is set to has a higher and higher chance of success and more human readable documentation, to the point where senior devs no longer have to check that they did their job correctly, and other AIs will begin to read/use the code and documentation other AIs wrote. This process will inch up the ladder piece by piece until senior devs begin assigning AI tasks that other senior devs would have done, notice that the AI does it better, and the total efficacy of the senior staff erodes. At this point companies will emerge entirely autonomously run, which is the final signal for other companies that human labor is no longer needed the moment something is automatable.
'CBT waste of money': Popular talking therapy is not a long-term solution
https://radiolab.org/podcast/corpse-demon
You aren’t entitled to have people agree with you on the internet - especially when you don’t know what you’re talking about and you’re just making wild claims about society.

I disagree with you, but sure “I’m a chat bot.” This conversation saddens you? Lol, ok. That clearly elevates the discourse.
Last year there was a local heat bubble that killed 69 people in my city. There was a bit of news coverage, but it hardly moved the needle in terms of local politics. Hell, the city can't even bother keep alive the trees it's recently planted nor stop pulling out more canopy to expand arterial roads in areas of the city that are heat islands due to lower than average tree coverage.

I think it's going to take more than hundreds of deaths to go beyond a few news stories that get lots of clicks for a week or two and talking points for politicians to bring up when it's convenient and forget when it is not.
> How can they manage my work without understanding it?

By assuming you're a responsible adult, perhaps. Sounds like you may be proving someone wrong.
It might be a bit more work, but Samsung also posts their updates so you can put them on a USB disk and upgrade from that and never need to connect your TV to the internet.