skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think this article is overstating things a bit. Chatgpt already lets you finetune the AI for your own use, so it's not like releasing LLaMa-2 as open source is going to seriously change things by a whole lot.
I'm pretty convinced we can do snow removal robots now for a few thousand dollars plus a few hundred a year of maintenance (snow and electronics don't mix well), but you are competing with a 25-year-old with a truck and a snowplow blade who comes by and clears it for $100/month.
I put that in my console and watched...
An employment contract is intended to backstop everything you were promised or negotiated during the hiring process. It doesn't really matter if you're in a right-to-work state or not, an employment contract provides you with recourse if the terms are not upheld by your employer. In the case of a breach, that is something you can remedy in court. (Whether or not it is worthwhile to pursue that legal case depends entirely on the context)

* anything you negotiated during hiring like RSU or sign-on bonuses

* stating your salary, benefits, vacation is the basis for protecting you from theft of that compensation.

* IP ownership clauses can protect your independent, off the clock work

* work location, if you are hired remote and then threatened with termination due to new RTO policies

I am just pulling from the top of my head general examples.
I sincerely doubt unless you are writing shell all day every day that you will get a decently complex working one liner out faster than GPT4.
No actually utilities have more and more needs concerning data quality and data type. Before the needed to make visual inspections only. Now they have to conduct multispectral inspections involving lidar, infrared, leak detection. All of this complexity data collection and they now need an efficient solution that can do all of these at once.
In general, the two ways to compute counts are top-down, by making a separate query for each filter, or bottom-up, by scanning the results and aggregating the counts, like a group-by. Top-down is good for a small universe of values, but bottom-up tends to be the scalable approach. And, as has been pointed out, you can produce approximations by aggregating a sample of the results -- as long as it is a representative random sample. Just be mindful of statistics, particularly confidence intervals.

A related issue is that counts tend to treat all results as equal. If you retrieva a lot of results but most of them are not relevant -- as can happen with full-text search -- then the counts can be misleading. You may have the converse problem if your retrieval excludes a lot of relevant results. So, if you are implementing a faceted search application where you use and show counts, you should keep in mind that it will only work if your retrieval does a reasonable job of balancing precision and recall.

Finally, remember that supply != demand. The distribution of a facet in your index may be different from the distribution of that facet in searcher intent. A bit more on that here: https://dtunkelang.medium.com/search-intent-not-inventory-28...
It's exactly opposite. The entire point of an enterprise option would be that you DO train it on corporate data, securely. So the #1 feature is actually missing, yet is announced as in the works.
Apologies, I missed this when initially posted and regret it. An illuminating and touching read which puts the book into context. Reading about her affliction brought me to tears at this point:

> At times, she said, bright sunshine has felt “like an oppression, a weight leaning on me”; she often retreats to a darkened room. In the late two-thousands, when her illness was at its worst, she was unable to get out of bed, experiencing depression, social anxiety, and agoraphobia.

Thanks for sharing the article, it resonates with me immensely. I went through similar hypersensitivity issues due to a car accident and brain injury, and still deal with some of that fallout. Knowing this background about Clarke makes the protagonist's perspective at the end even more meaningful to me.
Agreed.

Same is true for metrics derived from spans. (Though for metrics, you don't need to sample, and for spans you might. So keep in mind.)
As much as I hate using regulation as a hammer to fix things, if we did make software companies legally required to a level of security, then vulnerability testing like this could be prosecuted similar to SEC or OSHA violations and would work quite nicely
Wasn't there some kind of components proposal that would let modules written in different languages running in web assembly interop with each other?

WASI is great but there was an opportunity to standardize on something much more powerful.

Anyway I think the logical extreme of Unix philosophy started with Unix, moved on to Plan 9, and continued to improve from there. It's just that those further advancements are less popular and well known.

An old-fashioned file is not the logical extreme of anything. Not that it isn't useful or interesting.

I stead we don't even have a good way to do any kind of networking.
Wikipedia should focus on content creation – not social justice campaigns
Sorry I wasn’t clear. Sidecar is not the only way to do this was my point.
AFAICT the core of Fig isn't open source. (Why else would there be a waiting list for Linux users if they could just grab the code for Fig and build it themselves?)

What you are looking at seems to be a repository of autocompletion specs and some server to publish them.
> Water cleanliness doesn't matter, bacteria is everywhere[...]

It matters a lot, I've dived extensively, and the only time I've gotten an ear infection was in Indonesia, likely polluted runoff water contributed to that.

You'll find scientific articles backing that up, i.e. infections in general go up when swimming in untreated sewage/runoff, including ear infections.
Maybe he meant he's happy to see regular activity.
Why not both? I’ve programmed a transponder key the dealer wanted 400+ dollars to program. The key fob (an OE part) cost $40 online from another dealer — I’m assuming they sold me the key fob at a profit and not out of charity.

The programming procedure using a scan tool took 5 minutes.
> And if they had, people would be on here complaining about evil corporate greed because it costs $300 to duplicate and program a transponder key.

Has this changed? It cost zero dollars to program a transponder key last time I did (20ish years ago), since the instructions for doing so were in the car manual. It was some weird dance where you need two already-programmed keys and turn them in the ignition to specific positions in a specific order.
Any gun enthusiast that has ever tried to take friends shooting knows how hard it is to get people to wear earplugs correctly, especially the foam ones.

I'd say about 75% of guys do it wrong but will fix it if you show them how.

Basically 100% of women I have taken shooting hate ear plugs and it's almost a relationship argument trying to get them to install them correctly.
My experience with LLVM so far has been that is possible to get maximum speed as long as we generate the correct and clean LLVM IR, and do many of the high level optimizations ourselves.

If LLVM has any downsides, it is that it is hard to run in the browser, so we don't use it for https://dev.lfortran.org/, and that it is slow to compile (both LLVM itself, as well as it makes LFortran slow to compile, compared to our direct WASM/x64 backends). But when it comes to runtime performance of the generated code, LLVM seems very good.
> The 80% statistic refers to the percentage of Fortune 500 companies with registered ChatGPT accounts, as determined by accounts associated with corporate email domains.

Yeah... I have no doubt that people at my Fortune 100 company tried it out with their corporate email domains. We have about 80,000 employees, so it seems nearly impossible that somebody wouldn't have tried it.

But, since then the policy has come down that nobody is allowed to use any sort of AI/LLM without written authorization from both Legal and someone at the C-suite level. The main concern is we might inadvertently use someone else's IP without authorization.

I have no idea how many other Fortune companies have implemented similar policies, but it does call the 80% number into question for me.
It's mad that this even needs said. A company's aim should be to be sustainable and profitable, not to be a receptacle for capital. Some companies need external capital to get to that point, particularly hardware or those operating in slow-adopting markets. If you don't need it, don't take it.
I've ordered from JLBPCB before (designed an under-cabinet lighting system for my kitchen complete with PIR sensors and professional-looking installation... it was my first arduino project!) but I'm not too full of myself to admit that I know that it's going to be a learning experience with a few mess-ups along the way. I'm willing to pay for it, too, simply for the joy and enjoyment of learning and actually doing it!

Correct, I knew that I would need multiple amps, but I know that I could do that off-the-shelf as a first step, and perhaps build my own later (with better integration with my smart home).
In 2022, our local health department did a presentation about the wild success of anti-smoking campaigns in the high schools. They just couldn't pat themselves on the back hard enough.

My favorite thing was the interaction between the health department and a local principal, it went something like this:

Health Department representative reading off of a slide: "fewer than 5% of teens reported they had tried a tobacco product last year, with fewer than 1% indicating they had smoked a cigarette. We attribute this to the DARE and Too Good for Drugs campaigns as well as constant outreach from the DoH."

Principal: "we had to install vape detectors in every bathroom stall and then re-install them and hide them when the kids bashed them. We think that about 3/4 of the graduating class vapes."

Health Department: blank stares

There is what seems to be a willful ignorance about this in many professional circles. It's very strange to me.
Consider this: The total emission amount of the entire East Coast of the US is much bigger than that of California. Since the total amount (and not per capita) is what matters, we should focus on how to lower the East Coast's emissions and pay less attention to California.

In other words, one can look at "China" as just a big inclusion circle around a group of people.
> datadog apm, which has no affordable configuration

In my experience, Datadog's ingestion sampling works pretty well.

And there's retention filters you can use to override.
Discussion forums, especially ones driven by moderation, seem to be controlled by a certain subset of the population. Software Engineers and other WFH types, folks without jobs, folks with strong opinions, or folks with nothing better to do in their freetime.

If nothing else, this results in highly misleading feedback loops where outlier opinions and ideas are amplified and reinforced. Hang out in reddit for a while and you'd think the world was about to end(either from crime or rightwing hate groups depending on the subreddit).

Go and talk to people in real life who don't hang out online and you will find that much of the hottest topics online barely register in most folks' thinking.
Waiting on tables, mending puppets: first jobs that shaped researchers’ careers
The fiercest opposition to infill development comes at the local level from people who love their urban areas the way they are. YIMBY successes have been in moving these decisions to state legislatures that include broader geographies and more diverse urbanization levels. I don’t think it’s the 80% who are the problem, it's the 20% who've got theirs already.
So it is 50% more expensive than OpenAI. Even if that was comparable it proves my point that you can hardly do it for "cost close to $0".
Meh, I don’t think that is a problem endemic to shell specifically. That’s more of putting untested code in production. The thing about the fact that is a one liner is… if that happens and it’s not portable, who cares? You just turn around, paste that sucker back in, and say make it work on OsFlavor2.06 and you get back something that works. You don’t even have to fully understand why it isn’t portable, you can just ask the AI and have it explain why. If you wanted something battle tested in prod that was readable and understandable you wouldn’t be using one line shell scripts in the first place, regardless of whether they were written by an AI or not
Hetzner Cloud also deploys so fast, don't have to wait a billion years
REMIX is a bit different it extracts resources from the game so you could rework and replace them.

Additive only modding is arguably easy, however mods in which you extract and rework assets are more tricky since those assets are protected by their own copyright.

There could be cases in which the licensing agreement that covers those assets may not be compatible with modding since the license the publisher and developer have received is rather restrictive - speedtree generated assets come to mind as Autodesk(?) has or had a rather restrictive license on those, store bought art assets these days also probably have a non mod friendly license.

Then there is the whole thing around using trademark names in your sites and content.

Overall you want an approval especially for a large scale remaster mod.

And publishers/developers that may appear hostile to modders may actually have a valid reason rather than doing it just out of spite.
And this point that went over my head was? Don't confuse understanding with disagreement.

I started off curious what you might be referring to, if it wasn't just work profiles. I still am. But now I'm mostly just amazed how set you are in arguing some abstract unsubstantiated point, when a simple link could have supported it long ago.

(Also for reference, if someone said "I've read about Covid from a reputable source", what would you think?)
The Doomed City is a bad example since it was specifically released in a post-soviet era. It had very direct criticisms of communism which lead to the authors deciding to not release it during the soviet era they wrote it.

"Hard to be a God", mentioned below, is a better example. Soviet era Sci-Fi where Star Trek esque space communists try to uplift a medieval society into modern political belief before establishing official first contact.
"What are the parts of DNA?"

What's interesting is the answer included "chromosomes".
Yeah but just with literally everything else in life, everything is way more complex than first glance suggests, interconnected and if you actually care to dig deeper, you find interesting stuff. Nobody sane argues western Illuminati is steering and manipulating everything and everybody towards desired future, yet mass media manipulation is extremely common practice, ie mr Murdoch and similar folks have significant powers.

Also lets not forget that CIA was very active in Hollywood for many decades with light and not so light touches here and there, I mean its the propaganda tool for US hegemony and spreading western view on society, values, 'american dream' etc. If you want to shoot say an action movie with real US planes landing on real aircraft carriers, US navy will have non-trivial impact on your movie and its story (so most end up as over-patriotic to the point of being unwatchable for many non-US viewers).

Its all natural and logical, all humans like to see or hear stories that make us feel good even if its not proper truth, much more than stories telling some ugly hard truths.
I never claimed what you are asking me to refute.

As I did say, it has been getting worse and more concentrated in the last few decades.

And I guess combined with the loss of commercial viability of local news due to the Internet, a point I didn't include but is certainly relevant.
If it's a threat, then that's literally blackmail.

It's only legal to use the legal action, period. Once you pull in a THREAT, it becomes blackmail/extortion.
Illumina
Should a worker-owned company be an LLC? An LLC[1] is a union of assets put together for a common purpose. It's not a union of people. A worker-owned company should have a different legal structure, usually something created specifically for such an organization, though one would imagine partnerships would be suitable if the law doesn't provide for a special structure.

[1]Granted, I'm thinking of European definitions here, because I get really confused when I try to educate myself about American ones. An GmbH is more or less an AG with stakes rather than shares, whereas an American LLCs seem to behave somewhat differently (taxation, for example is pass-trough).
I feel attacked reading the headline. My friends and I all send each other the stupidest memes. There's 100% a daily need for memes from multiple accounts "content creator" wise. They need to be fresh too. I'm sure every 3-6 months we send each other a few duplicates but... it's more fun to laugh to yourself about something and then fire it off with the "share" button. Then your friends do the same back to you.

Without it, I'd feel lonely lol
And The Watchmen long before that
This is an RTX remix mod so this is a de facto remaster.

A sequel maybe.
It depends. We once were quoted 300K/year by a SaaS company. We replied by saying that our budget is 20K. "Fair enough, we'll take that".
I know how it sounds.
I genuinely mean it without trolling.
I'm referring to this:

> When Paul Hudson, the West Point archaeologist, reached his gloved hand into the unsealed lead box, he retrieved only dust and crumbling bits of dirt the color of pale ash.

There exist archeological finds of this kind and they do match material description.
> Tell the patient the risk of each outcome.

This isn't a simple problem of calculating EV. Telling somebody that there's a 40% chance that the positive test is actually wrong and in the 60% case that it's right, 40% of the time it's going to be benign, but if it's not benign it might kill them but if it is benign and they do surgery they might be left wearing diapers is not a simple thing for a person to evaluate. Add to that the fact that people have a bias towards action, so doctors tend to overindex on treatment vs. just ignoring something, and you have an incredibly complex problem.

> The math is easy.

No, it's not. It's a series of probabilities combined with extremely subjective outcomes (getting erectile dysfunction may have a very different impact on your life if you're 40 vs. 80).

> If we don't have the numbers for it, then get them.

You're just trivializing medicine and medical research here. Why don't you just go ahead and build some AI that'll solve this whole problem by diagnosing cancers based on a blood sample? That seems easy enough.

> This seems preferable to blinding ourselves out of fear that we'll do something stupid with the information we might get.

Ironically what you're describing here is the opposite of everything you've just talked about. If we understand the numbers well, and from those we can conclude that tests are highly prone to false positives and thus that treatment based on positive results is more likely to be harmful than helpful, then we shouldn't take those tests. That's not blinding ourselves, it's acting appropriately based on understanding the math.
Or just kubectl apply a bunch of yaml files?

or argocd / helm charts?
In a scrum using firm:

I was the Team Lead of a team, and I told my management: "SCRUM will not work for our workload. We have too many shifts in priority to plan for 4 weeks at a time."

I was told I could choose any process I needed to get the job done, but we needed a "Scrum Master" to interface with the other teams. I played Scrum Master. I also had the team running on Kanban, which while imperfect, it beat the alternatives for a team that had to shift targets rapidly.
Rust Programming in Hungarian
Vite = 5173
just figured out the rather “strange” choice of port number on VITE

if we take into account that 1 looks like “I”, 3 looks like “e” (somehow), 4 looks like “A” and so on, and also remember about roman numerals we'll have:

V → 5 (roman numeral)
I → 1
T → 7
E → 3

quite clever tbh
Just the SOC2 bit will generate revenue… If your organization is SOC2 compliant, using other services that are also compliant is a whole lot easier than risking having your SOC2 auditor spend hours digging into their terms and policies.
I’d be surprised if we don’t see more specialized chips in the future- kind of like Bitcoin isn’t mined on GPUs anymore. There just hasn’t been much of a need for specialized AI chips so far but GPUs have been useful and profitable in rendering etc for a long time. But I think Google made “TPU”s already (tensor processing unit)
Yes, we could make the WASM->x64 standalone. The main motivation is speed of compilation. We do not do any optimizations, but we want to generate the x64 binary as quickly as possible, with the idea that it would be used in Debug mode, for development. Then for Release mode you would use LLVM, which is slow to compile, but good runtime performance. And since we already have ASR->WASM backend (used for example at https://dev.lfortran.org/), maintaining WASM->x64 is much simpler than ASR->x64 directly.
Which law targeted straws specifically? The 2019 directive on single-use plastics (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/904/oj) targeted a wide variety of single-use plastics related to food consumption.
This isn't at all like nuclear weapons though. Carbon emissions are demand based, and if China (the government or the people) thought that burning more carbon right now would provide advantages (that are outweighed by whatever perceived cost they or their government imposes), they would do so.

It's not like there's going to be a 'carbon emissions exchange' where everyone rapidly decides to start burning way more stuff... you need to do something with that energy generated.
How would your drone react to an unexpected bad weather/gusts (the 20% winds you want to avoid)? I guess you can’t just land anywhere ?
TLDR on the actual hack, they forgot to set Firebase security rules, yet again.

How do devs forget this step before raising 4.5 million in seed funding?
Is this the same outfit that did LPython? It looks like the same/similar web design.
> threatening to do a legal act is largely legal. it's not illegal to threaten reporting to the authorities, for instance.

It absolutely can be illegal, in the case of extortion. If you say "do this or I turn you in" that's extortion.
"Let's try reading the article...."

Wrongly assumes 100% of relevant info is in this article

"this should help"

Your help appears to be in service of spreading hurtful narratives, so no thanks.

I'd prefer an honest misogynist any day over a sophist bent on "changing" minds. Please do the world a favor and stop helping so much.
The WASM Component Model

https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model
Firefox 117 Available with Local Automated Translation Support
Interesting! Clean UI, good execution. Am I correct in thinking that these are all copyright-free books? Also, which vendor do you use to send emails and how many customers do you have so far?
Fine-tuning the LLM in the way that you're mentioning is not even an option: as a practical rule fine-tuning the LLM will let you do style transfer, but you knowledge recall won't improve (there are edge cases, but none apply to using ChatGPT)

That being said you can use fine tuning to improve retrieval, which indirectly improves recall. You can do things like fine tune the model you're getting embeddings from, fine tune the LLM to craft queries that better match a domain specific format, etc.

It won't replace the expensive on-the-fly retrieval but it will let you be more accurate in your replies.

Also retrieval can be infinitely faster than inference depending on the domain. In well defined domains you can run old school full text search and leverage the LLMs skill at crafting well thought out queries. In that case that runs at the speed of your I/O.