skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe you're thinking of Peek/TwitterPeek? $99 Blackberry style handheld with free cellular, but strictly for email/Twitter only.
Iirc the simulation is more difficult the more components there are in an atom, and oxygen 28 has a lot of them.
What everyone is saying is that you do less work, use 0 heuristics and guess absolutely nothing, to get 100% accuracy.
2023-08-31/28

I don't think that's valid, as the abbreviated form allows excluding identical parts, so expanded this is

2023-08-31/2023-08-28

which has the start time after the end.
> It's sort of a big deal in academia and some percentage of other people feel pretty attached to the title.

Having been yelled at by colleagues for opting to not include Dr. on my own freaking business cards - here here.
> It's hard to be brave when

By definition, the only time it's possible to be brave is when it's hard.
Actual post from February 2023: https://theconversation.com/what-the-first-amendment-really-...
I think the topic of conversation was how some businesses don't offer payment options beyond WeChat/AliPay.. maybe the CCP talked to these businesses? But it seems the more logical answer is the businesses thinking "Who the hell doesn't have WeChat?"
From my point of view, controlling the canonical namespace is a form of soft power in the ecosystem. Since as the post says, the actual files are hosted on GitHub, the cost of the extra load on their infrastructure is real but probably not material to a company of their size -- as I understand it, it's more like running a DNS service than a file host.

So it _seems_ (the word I used above as well) from my perspective that they’re giving up a bunch of soft power for little gain, but it's very possible that I'm either wrong about the value of the soft power, or wrong about the cost of running the infra.
Whatever starts as 'social networking' i think it is inevitable that it will end up becoming 'social media', because people add friends but don't delete, and by the central limit theorem users will become average, that can easily be substituted by an ML model. Even if mastodon is OK now, it will end up with the same situation as it grows.

I still prefer when the world was divided in forums, not friend groups.
https://invidious.flokinet.to/playlist?list=PL7qUW0KPfsIIOPO...

Here's the same course, but on invidious, for those who don't go onto Youtube "proper".

Is there a HN policy on this? Seems more "neutral" to post the non-youtube link to me. There are people who don't go on to youtube, whereas I don't know of anyone with a moral issue with invidious?

Anyway, course looks cool, I'm bookmarking for after doing a few more practical fun things first to build motivation. Cheers.
He included transfer time on/off the storage medium. So MicroSD would have been a net negative.

A lot of the details are in the video.
Helpful context would be that some groups in India can parlay their political power and social prestige into oppression certificates ("OBC") that lets them into top universities with scores much lower than everybody else. Which... fine... whatever -- politics is politics. But it is funny, delusional even, to see the author act as if these certificates should have any currency in the west.
Worker cooperatives still have some kind of hierarchical structure because each owner has a different job, but major business decisions are still democratically voted on by every owner.
>If X tries to become LinkedIn, it sounds like their major opportunity is to become the worst of both worlds. And what Elon thought was "cool" in the past was, at least in my opinion, mostly not.

Wouldn't the impact largely be on how people looking for jobs on X would have to clean up their profiles/history?
Developing with Dragonfly: Cache-Aside
social media at work, you say.

My own bar for great stuff done by others is high, yet at least if I mention anything it's sincere.
Mondragon started in 1956 and currently has over 81,000 owners. It's not a scam.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation
Huh that is a solid point, how big a fraction would you estimate to be actually capable of doing real GPU coding?
I looked at your feed and it's obvious why your interaction is low: you're not tagging your posts.

The interaction model on Mastodon is perhaps inverted from X, FB, IG, and so on. On those platforms, it makes sense to follow handles; those platforms are creator focused. On Mastodon, it makes sense to follow tags first ("the community") and then follow interesting people in those communities.

Scanning all of your posts, only the most recent one has a tag (#buildinpublic) while the rest are just text. This means that your content won't reach into the home feeds of folks who share common interests.

Your June 8 post on Apple's stock value: you might have seen better engagement with simply using the #apple tag.

Your Nov 19, 2022 post should be tagged with #css, #html, maybe #webdev.

If you don't tag your posts, they won't show up in any home feeds and because the feed is linear in time, they won't have much visibility. Try better usage of tags and see how you do.
There is no business reason to restrict themselves on the ISA, and it would be make their hardware less performant compared to the competition which would not be so bound.
NASA Wants a Giant Inflatable Bag to Collect and Throw Out Space Junk
Yeah the files are organized into a directory hierarchy, pretty cool tech! :-)

And there are great tools for exploring directories of files, my current favorite is dolphin with two or three panes.
> even people making >100K are reporting that they feel like they can't get ahead

I know people making $5+ million who say the same. This is the human condition. Anecdotes of not getting ahead and personal strife are terrible inputs for economic policy.

American GDP per capita is about $75k [1]. Median household income around $70k [2]. If you want natural figure to revolve around, those are good ones.

[1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?location...

[2] https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2022/demo/p60-27...
Anyone's free to brute force encrypted data?
> If I open a document or spreadsheet in the default installed apps, saving them will save them in the proprietary shitty Apple formats

Do you mean Pages/Keynote/Numbers?

Since these are not 1:1 (neither on feature nor in concepts) with MS Office/OpenOffice opening such a file is by definition a lossy import, so saving in the original format would be destructive, both with regards to the original contents being lossily converted to Apple app concepts and any Apple concept specific change made after opening being lossily converted to the original format.

This is not user hostile, this is saving the user from the impedance mismatch between software that organically grew from Multiplan and software that's been designed from the ground up.

Now, the Apple office suite being "shitty" is largely your personal (and the way you phrased it, judgemental) opinion, I personally prefer the Apple office suite any day to MS Office/OpenOffice/GDocs.
That's just because Musk thinks "just don't pay your bills" is a negotiation tactic. He's just trying to abuse his debtors into agreeing to smaller amounts.

Musk and twitter has cash, precisely because they are choosing not to pay anything. That tends to do wonders for your cash flow. That doesn't mean they are profitable, or sustainable.
It should have been brought up to $200k per year. Exempt employees are pretty much always used to get around sufficiently staffing, either with sufficient redundant number of employees or sufficiently paying for dependable
employees.

I assume anyone with a customer facing “manager” title is just the on call employee who trades their ability to earn overtime for less volatility in their pay (salary).

This is especially prevalent in immigrant communities with chain migration where the more recent families that migrate are expected operate a convenience store/gas station/motel/laundromat/franchise restaurant/etc day and night 7 days per week in exchange for the minimum allowed exempt salary.
and an oldtime classic germaine to the sport:

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1232/1232-h/1232-h.htm [The Prince, Nicolo Machiavelli]
Then why did the H1 Visa allotments get increased recently? I'm sure its just their way to save face.
As parent deleted, which tweet was being referenced?
I let managers know about great interactions with their direct reports. It never occurred to me to ask. I may start doing so. But this reason for not doing it boils my blood:

> One person mentioned that they got reprimanded by their manager for getting a spot peer bonus for helping someone on another team.

This is a hill I will die on: people at $this_company are a team and helping one another is critical in building healthy teams and organizations. Slack in the schedule must exist and helping each other should fill that slack. Balance of course, but "sorry, I can't help for an hour to unblock you until [checks calendar] next quarter... maybe" type responses hurt organizations more than they know.
I think their point (in this discussion here) can make sense and remain true to the point (made in the example statement) by adjusting the feedback segue to something like "I really [appreciate that] you tackled this".
We omitted the details for the sake of brevity (the article is already really long), but we run agents on the test devices and plug them into CI. Agents allow remote access for servicing remotely, and that's enough most of the time.

For things like system updates and taking care of the hardware - we do it manually today. The fleet is still small, so it is manageable but in the future we would like to consider a vendor, if we can find one.
Probably because I live in a detached home, but I kind of don't care if somebody else's bike catches on fire, but I strongly care if they are going to be going to be going over 50kph on a MUP. Even so, I think certification is a poor way of addressing the issue, since people modify the firmware of mass-manufactured ebikes all the time.
Yes, that is exactly what I came here to comment!

It seems "trivial" enough to detect a total shot change, and then in cases of things like fast-moving action sequences you just collapse all short shots into a single longer shot (e.g. all shots 5 seconds or less get collapsed together with any neighborhing shot 5 seconds or less).

And then pick a single frame from the exact middle, or else the most "still" frame that shows the least change from neighboring ones.
>>they might not want their micromanaging manager to know they helped you outside the scope of their work

So, Yeah, im going to have to ask you to do more given you have received so much praise from your colleagues... Yeah.... Thankssssss....

-

This is a valid concern.

There are some many unaware wolves that think they are good managers because they have info on their staff, as opposed to a relationship understanding their staff....
I think the second theorem is the "worse" result for mathematics. It shows that it's completely impossible to use a weaker system, which is hopefully self-evident, to prove the consistency of a stronger, but weirder system like ZFC.

Hilbert wanted to show that, even if you don't "believe" in ZFC, we could at least try to convince you that it doesn't lead to contradictions, but that fundamentally didn't work.
I'd argue as a hobbyist you can get away with "block level" design - understand enough to know what you need, read datasheets and implement a reference design. For example making a stepper motor do what you want - probably not, just buy a driver board and look at example code and a reference circuit. Same goes for a high power motor: either you buy a pre-made board that has the right spec, or you look up a reference circuit with a common control IC. Most digital design can be done in this way; you need to know how to program as well.

Analog is in some ways more complicated. But there are lots of reference designs for blocks like filters and amplifiers and you can look at the pros/cons of different circuits. A good companion to this sort of design work is Horowitz and Hill. Even high frequency board design can mostly be achieved around by following best practices unless you're doing stripline RF stuff.

The difference lies in things like designing extremely efficient circuits (optimize for part number, cost, etc) and designing boards that can be certified. You can get away with a lot if you're not designing to a tight spec.
> I think it's awesome. It sets a public precedent for kind behavior and appreciative attitudes. It always makes me happy to see people thanking each other in that chat.

Which brings exactly the same problem as the likes: some people always appear on those chats, some people never do. Does that mean that they are doing a bad job? No... they just get less visibility.

How do you get more visibility on the "gratitude" chat? By thanking the others, so that they see you more and think about thanking you in return, I suppose? In my experience, some teams keep congratulating themselves, some don't, at all. And management sees those who are visible, even if it is not fair.

It can quickly get artificial, and a bit depressing for the people who don't really appear there.
I misread their comment
Similarly Lawrence & Lee's 1955 Inherit the Wind which was a fictionalization of the 1925 Scopes "Monkey Trial" about a teacher being on trial for teaching evolution in the Deep South. Like with The Crucible, it was really talking about the current events of McCarthyism, as in the 1950s it was assumed that everybody accepted evolution by then. Although as later decades showed, creationism wasn't quite as dead as belief in witchcraft.
Understanding Deep Learning
INAL but I don't think they can strike https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Service_Labor-Manageme...
Poll: Cybertruck Will
Never have more than 10,000 units built and effectively never ship as a real product
Ship between 10,000 and 100,000 units but be 100% recalled and scrapped due to overwhelming problems
Ship over 100,000 units, suffer multiple recalls, and end production in under 2 years after first customer delivery
Reach Elon's estimate of 250,000 to 500,000 units per year and have a product lifespan at least as long as Model 3
Enable millions of people to ride Cybertruck robotaxis that swim across rivers and make a profit for their owners
Bet on the winner and buy stocks?
I agree that I was following a bit of a tangent. However, I do wonder how it's even possible to be committed to the idea of truth if one can so easily overlook the obvious flaws of one's own "side", always immediately changing the subject to the badness of the other side.
A couple of years ago I bought 21 14TB HDs in the US that I unboxed and packed into a suitcase (actually mostly carry-on (to give me the most control of the banging they would receive) a few were with my clothes) and brought back with me. USA had no issues with it, when I got to my destination, they required me to pay import duties on them (still cheaper than buying locally). No one gave me any problems from a security pov.
Math can be structured and proven verifiably true or false. Things are labeled as conjectures when it's unknown if it's true in all cases. In less formal fields (all other scientific fields) there are more unknowns since experimentation failures cause issues. As the scale of the experiments' unknowns increase so does the difficulty for reproduction etc...

Psychology, sociology, economics and other high level scientific forms have so many unknowns that it's extreamly difficult to verify if a claim is scientifically true so its not surprising to me that fraud is easier in these fields than others.
Durations are pretty nice and seriously missing from the RFC.
It definitely does; the reason we have this rule in the first place is that this story about Zadie Smith is absolutely dominated by an off-topic thread about website presentation that nobody at the New York Times is ever going to read or care about.
The only thing more offensive than calling a book, movie, or TV show "intellectual property" is calling it "content". The former turns creative work into something you buy and sell on Fidelity[0] and the latter turns it into TikTok. Either way, the end result is human culture being made disposable.

[0] As far as I'm aware, nobody has actually tried selling fractionalized derivatives of copyright, patent, or trademark interest on an open market. The closest you can do is buy shares of a media conglomerate. I assume it would at least be legally possible if you could get the SEC to sign off on it and write up a contractual structure for how the fractional owners of the work would agree on licensing it out.
Yes, I just mean that’s not the method described in the article.
Cray was never selected. Either they didn't submit an offer, or their price was too high.
That seems a bit pedantic, practically every HN reader will know that Apple doesn't literally mine every chunk of silicon and aluminum out of the ground themselves, so by default they, or the end customer, are paying the profit margins of thousands of intermediary companies.
How is that not just equivocation on the meaning of the term ‘life’ though?

Isn’t that like saying nothing is ‘cold’ because coldness doesn’t really exist, its just a lack of heat?

When I say “this toaster is not alive” you know exactly what I mean. When I say “this corpse is dead” you know exactly what I mean. Why play word games about it?
> If you are calling out your colleagues for doing bad work, or not the way you would do it work, you should try to rephrase into praise w/ direction. “I really liked how you tackled this, have you thought about this approach?” Instead of “Why didn’t you do it this way?”

I don't want to work with people that communicate this way.
I don't think you're actually grappling with the idea of "a cultural principle of free speech" here.

If I imagine a culture with the maximum level of respect for free speech as a principle - a strong cultural belief that the best way to reach the truth is by debating ideas, even terrible ones - I imagine a culture in which a Nazi can state their piece at a bar, and then everyone calmly discusses their opinions and why they're wrong.

If I imagine a culture with a minimum level of respect for free speech, I imagine a culture in which I might say something anodyne, like "the minimum wage should be increased," and lose all the friends who disagree with me.

Think, for example, about high school debate. In the past, it was an arena in which various controversial proposals were thrown out and discussed. It had a high level of respect for free speech as a principle.

Nowadays, some debate judges say things like (this is an actual quote):

> I will no longer evaluate and thus never vote for rightest capitalist-imperialist positions/arguments... Examples of arguments of this nature are as follows: fascism good, capitalism good, imperialist war good, neoliberalism good, defenses of US or otherwise bourgeois nationalism, Zionism or normalizing Israel, colonialism good, US white fascist policing good, etc.

Everyone here is exercising their freedom of speech. That doesn't mean they're showing equal respect for the free expression of ideas.
because it's incredibly easy to use, and numpy and pandas are written in python.
"Klamath" on a tech news site still triggers Pentium II memories for me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_II
Sure but what does it cost for 32gb of space rated, radiation hardened memory?

Maybe even in triplicate for a consensus system!
Judging by the time it takes to completely migrate away from old technologies, I wouldn't be surprised if we will be emulating x86 on our quantum computers in the year 100k.
Since ~55K is the median income in the USA, its seems like a reasonable place to draw the line.

https://www.firstrepublic.com/insights-education/how-much-do...
Your assertion that this sort of linguistic hedge is a lie is itself based on a few false assumptions:

1. That there is one correct way to do something

2. That you know that way, and they don't

3. That they didn't consider and disregard that way in early planning due to something you're unaware of

What you see as lying is intended to avoid an arrogant disregard for their time and thought, and also to avoid having ego dictate the conversation rather than ideas.
Regular bicycles also use hydraulic brakes and internal hub gears (and by the way, hub-geared drivetrains are less complex, just more expensive). All of the e-bike rated parts are coming from the same companies that sell normal bike parts. The difference is with companies like Van Moof and Rad Power Bikes, which use proprietary stuff to save money by dealing directly with Chinese factories to design them, rather than just ordering normal parts in bulk from brand-name providers.

Another issue comes with the actual battery and motor, because if you don't get a bike with a system from Bosch, Shimano, or Yamaha, chances are you're on your own for support. Bafang etc are much cheaper but the onus of support is on the vendor directly -- a bike shop can work with Bosch to find and fix problems, but for the Bafang gear they have to deal with whatever (possibly fly-by-night) vendor resold the gear, because Bafang won't help much.
It's interesting that he started with that topic. As opposed to voltage, current , RC circuits, etc. He's got quite a few topics, like emitter followers and op amps. But I think he's a bit below the level of what people need in order to create useful PCB level electronics. I think something like this would be so much more useful if it was tied to an existing book on the subject, like for instance "The Art of Electronics". Which actually doesn't cover device physics but start with just transistor and diode models presented as facts.
I've heard content creators either say explicitly in videos, or in text under videos, things along the line of "Sorry I made a mistake here but I need to get this video out". Imagine reading an essay where the author tried to pull something like that.
I'd bookmark the Youtube link though, I expect them to stick around for longer.
I absolutely love that this person it enamored with butterflies enough that they recognized this descrepancy in the way they are depicted in advertisements.
This should not be the case even on a single CPU machines that run interactive jobs. This is a shoddy process scheduling work.
there's a very strong selection bias. we don't really hear about the cases where a team does so-so sprints, it's not great agile/scrum/paganism, but the product evolves, development goes in an okay-ish manner, and there's just not much to talk about.

the whole structure gives enough support, retros surface problems and give sufficient pushback against "features only, no bugs" management style, sprints gave some sane cadence to both devs and product, daily status checks help to detect folks who are stuck, "refinement" forces both sides to actually commit to some kind of written stuff, and "grooming" provides much needed priorization and black comedy relief as the team tries to come up with a non-pedo expression for the activity.

of course, there are valid criticisms of scrum/agile. mostly that it fails to teach developers to realize their need to set boundaries with regards to interaction with "the client", aaand that most managers and projects are non-ideal, underfunded, and devs should leave it, and look for better ones (even with possibly lower pay).
That the edges are blurry doesn't mean there's no definite thing.

For that edge we have the term "crossover" (for example, the Ford Edge)

Sports cars in the category of coupe explicitly lack the "U" in "SUV" - that this is referred to as vague or debatable in this thread is a bit maddening, so I will just end with, lol.
And so, you want a probabilistic time estimate based on the likelihood of that passing?
You plant could plant aspen for the carbon credits, the bison dig them up, the aspen don’t grow, carbon doesn’t get captured.

It might not be happening in this case but you better believe people plant some trees and they don’t grow for one reason or another.