skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Even if the chip didn't cooperate, Apple has the key derivation function and presumably everything used to generate your key. While we're on the topic of unlikely first-party attacks, it would be interesting to hear (or see) how Apple limits their ability to create duplicate keys.
Hey folks, this is Graham -- CEO of DetSys. Happy to help answer any questions!
I once saw a young lady in the lab in Soda hall getting obviously frustrated. A few moments later she exclaimed, "Why is it so f**ing hard!" and then as if in a cartoon slammed her forehead into the lab computers keyboard repeatedly before a TA noticed and came over to help. It was like something out of a cartoon.
I've taken CS/Programming courses at a few institutions and never seen quite that level of despair/frustration. Maybe its just a CAL thing, I didn't end up transferring to CAL in the end so CS61A was the only class I did on campus, so can't really say.
This isn't because the software is secure, it's because nation-state actors outbid both Apple and the rest of the community for exclusive access to software vulnerabilities. New vulns often don't hit the jailbreak community for months or even years after the NSA has already used them to rifle through your shit.

Furthermore, to achieve what the jailbreak community would consider a usable jailbreak, you need to string together several different vulnerabilities or bypasses into a single exploit chain. Nation-state actors will settle for just attacking iMessage directly, which gives them all your text messages, but is entirely useless for loading unsigned code or injecting tweaks into apps.

To make matters worse, the UK is mulling a bill that would give them veto rights on security updates, specifically so that their old exploits would continue to work until they've bought new vulns.
You are replying to swyx.
It's not a very useful data structure, despite all the hype and investment. You'd be better off learning general programming with an emphasis on data structures that are widely used. The book "Designing Data-Intensive Applications" by Martin Kleppmann is a mind-blowing modern survey of data structures and their applications.
Webster’s 1913 (as in, the 1913 edition of the dictionary) relates this sense as “grappling with”, as in wrestling, and provides an example from a Dublin University publication to illustrate this exact idiomatic usage we’re discussing.

I’d say it’s not derived from American football.
Boggles my mind that for as long as I've worked, I rarely see this in practice. It costs almost nothing to do. I try to do it when I can.
The other way that the government tries to do skirt the First Amendment is by having hearings where the Congresspeople/Senators publicly berate and threaten the CEOs of social media companies over content that is protected under the First Amendment
Most Usenet servers had strict retention limits; there was no expectation of availability of historical discussions.
Do I need this level of depth to get a microcontroller to make a stepper motor do what I want to do (whatever that may be)

Dave over at the EEVBlog likes to draw a distinction here. He distinguishes between people who want to learn electronics (build power supplies, radios), that is, analog circuits, from people who want put together Arduino projects. He refers to the latter as more of embedded programming rather than electronics.

The linked course definitely leans way over to the side of the former. If you’re more interested in the latter, there are tons of YouTube channels out there about building projects with the Arduino.
Sharing GPUs only really makes sense for GPUs that are large enough to share. MIGs can work for 80Gi A100s but won't work with smaller cards like T4s. It also adds latency to the GPU operations. Unfortunately there's not yet a silver bullet for this stuff.
This is a deeper cut of pretty foundational stuff. Almost no user will need to actually interact with schemas, and instead will use schemas provided by other folks. In other words, if this doesn't make sense: don't worry, you don't need to know about it :).

The tl;dr, though:

* nix flake show and other tools only knew about very specific types of things you might put in a flake.

* with flake-schemas, that limitation is lifted and people can do more creative things.
Already (implicitly) mentioned in the gp.
Store "names" as a JSON document per person, and provide different view functions that construct a "full name" string based on that data and localized standards/conventions. You have infinite flexibility with nominal (heh) overhead.
You lost everybody at Gavin Newson. Chatgpt probably could have wrote the rest of your rant. You are basically one of the typical “free speech as long as it furthers my left wing views otherwise Nazi Nazi Nazi”
Lol I swear to God I only read the first two paragraphs before I wrote the above and then I just skimmed the rest of your comment and you quoted Nazi Germany!!!!
To be clear, as long as there are people like you, they’ll always be people like me to make sure you don’t stay in power long.
Any ebike company that's using parts that my local bike shop can't work on is not getting my money. Also any local bike shop that insists they need to charge more for an ebike is not getting my business either. Ebikes are bikes with battery + motor mostly and not a new invention.
Usenet was definitely slow (very, very slow, even), in the sense that posts made in the US might take up to 18 hours (or whenever dial-up got "cheap") to show up in the rest of the world, or vice versa. Even posts between locally-adjacent sites might take a few hours to propagate. This may, incidentally, help to explain why discourse on Usenet was generally considered to be superior to that, say, on Twitter. But YMMV.

Also, Usenet was very much censored, in the sense that most sites would not even think about carrying most groups. In particular, alt.* and *.binaries.* would be unavailable pretty much anywhere that had "cost of bandwidth" or "reputation" concerns.

And if you repeatedly posted abusive content to any Usenet group, you can bet that your account and/or entire site would be "cancelled" from the network pretty quickly by the infamous "Usenet cabal" (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backbone_cabal). Not to mention that Usenet was the entire origin for the concept of the "killfile".

Finally, the most popular Usenet hubs (say, UUnet) were very much for-profit...
I dunno. I've met most of my friends, including a lot of people in my local area, via the Fediverse, long before these recent waves of migration. Numbers are a lot less important than real connection.
Germany has the brain drain problem too, what does that tell you? People are greedy. period.
If it is worker owned, then each worker has their own money invested. This is enough to ensure everyone will take responsibility for the success of the business. If someone did fail to do so, they would be voted out and their investment would be returned and someone else would be brought in to invest and replace them.
> it's about being genuine

I think this is an incredibly important lesson. Don't lie, _actually_ find something good to say. It's a goddamned super power, and it's also very good for your own mental health.
There was no SD card, it was 5x 1 TB USB drives. Given their write speeds it would take ~100 minutes to write 3 TB to them (sequentially) and that seems to line up with the value of the pigeon line at 0 miles.
It's manipulative only if there really is no redeeming quality to their approach, which, in any realistic scenario there probably is.

I interpret this as, not that you should lie, you should just NOT focus 100% on the negative aspect. At the very least you can thank them for taking the time & effort to implement this solution & test it or w/e (I assume they did "some" work & put in some amount of well meaning effort).

If I can't genuinely find anything to praise about something I want to criticism, it's a sign that it's pretty bad (or I have a bad working relationship with this person) and that is a bigger, separate problem
It might be fair to assume op is as well. Beyond that, people have 'afforded' kids since there have been people, and this includes the worst deprivations at the beginning of the industrial age. Birth rates are actually inversely correlated with income, and this cuts across industrial and agrarian societies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_and_fertility
I agree. But I think it stretches the bounds of credulity to think that Twitter would do it any better. They're more likely to be worse.
I don’t know why but it always bothers me when people comment on an amendment in long form like this but only include the excerpt instead of the full context.

The article…

> It simply states: "Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech."

The entire first amendment…

> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Very often they _have_ thought about the other approach and rejected it for reasons. When you go into something like this open minded, you might come out learning something new. :)
I first posted on Usenet in 1995.. I am OG
COVID-19 made wearing face masks normal. No one needs to know if you’re wearing a mask to protect against COVID or to protect your privacy.
If you want to live those good old BBS days again - https://www.telnet.org/htm/places.htm

I played a few games of Tradewars on one of these a while ago. It sure brought back the days of being a sysop of my local BBS growing up.
> as long as the simulated behaviour is qualitatively similar to the real thing.

My point is that I suspect that unless you have a very sophisticated simulation, it won't be.

> I’d imagine the important things would be the shape of the sail

The shape of a sail is itself a very complex thing to model and simulate. I'm not even a real sailor and I'm already thinking about camber, twist, and luffing. When sailing upwind, the sail is functioning like a wing using lift. When sailing downwind, it's relying on drag. Points in between use a mixture. This implies that turbulence and stall must be simulated at some level of fidelity.

If you've got a mainsail and a jib, then you have to worry about the slot effect and one sail blocking the wind of the other.

> and the heel of the boat for a given apparent wind

Not just heeling, but weather helm, leeway, drag, displacement, and how those interact.
I'd never want a bike that can lock itself remotely, my big fear would be the same as what you get when you have an irresponsible and inquisitive toddler at the back of the bike: "I wonder what would happen if I locked daddy's bike while we're cruising along?"

Only then without the toddler...

What in particular do you service on the electronics of your cargo bike?
Yeah that’s a good point: if substantial value is added every month (as in a streaming service), a subscription model is not quite so offensive. Subscription models for software that remains essentially static (aside from bug-fixes and occasional features) is just a rip-off. And yes, I understand that these folks need a constant revenue stream to pay their bills… but so does everybody else, including the mom & pop grocery stores that have to get by with whatever margin they make on the goods they sell and don’t have the option of charging for a monthly membership just to have the privilege of walking through their door.

This crap has to stop. I’ve stopped paying for subscriptions. Hopefully I’m not the only one and revenues will be impacted enough for developers to react.

I’m sure I’ll draw substantial ire from developers here who depend on the subscription model but I don’t really care. You have monthly expenses for your AWS services? Mom & pop pay for rent. Unlike them you can probably re-architect your app to rely on on-device processing. I’m through with this crap.
What's new with Postgres at Microsoft, the Aug 2023 version
Cooperative multitasking on a multi-core CPU? How on earth does that work? Do games themselves assign their threads to cores explicitly?
I know there's a lot of Musk stans in here, but he really did destroy Twitter, possibly at the behest of the Saudis, and it is now a late night Fox News like ads space full of scams.
> criminalizing hate speech

Hmm, this comment by bitwise seems really hateful against free speech protections. I propose that we throw them in jail to punish them for their hatred. /s

> One of the things the Germans realized is that if you want to enjoy a functioning democracy, you must silence people who hold antidemocratic views well before they become too powerful to be stopped.

No, you must get your act together and fix your country's problems so that duplicitous demagogues don't have a receptive audience of depesperate people who have lost trust in the system. Nazism would never have taken over Germany if it wasn't for the hyperinflation and economic disaster of the Weimar years, the Soviets would never have won in Russia if the Czars hadn't impoverished the Russian people with serfdom and war, Putin would not be in power today if Yeltsin hadn't let the oligarchs loot the Russian people in the 90s… After WWII, the US invested a fortune through the Marshall plan to rebuild Western Europe economically, that was the most impactful measure for stopping extremism.

> Hint: the USA is not a democracy. It is an oligarchy of the power elite, formed by the power elite for that very purpose.

The USA is a constitutional federal republic. It's far from perfect, but it is the freest, most prosperous, most technolgically advanced, and most socially mobile nation of comparable size in history. I wasn't born here, but I live here now and have no plans of leaving; when you know what the real oligarchies are like, it gives you some perspective.

But, let's assume for the more moment that you are correct, and that the US really is run entirely by evil power-hungry oligarchs. Why in the world would you want to give them more power? Do you support the oligarchs?
I tried soylent for awhile. But then realized the people who lit the dumpster fire at SD were there too.
You mention your company has closed ... but FWIW:

Next time try the United States Postal Inspection Service. They are a full federal law enforcement agency with nationwide jurisdiction and might be interested in a case like this (IDK how much they are kicking-down-doors-guns-blazing or investigating dog-bites-mail-person cases).

I once had a law enforcement friend tell me that if you're ever buying items on eBay and are worried about scams, pay for it with a USPS money order (by mail) because any scams would then be mail fraud for the USPIS to investigate vs. your local PD who isn't going to be able to do much if the scammer is elsewhere.

YMMV!
It’s funny because I still feel the opposite of you — I think the example where you say that you like their solution is a better approach, as long as it’s not horrible.

It leaves open the possibility that you as the reviewer are actually mistaken, and they possibly have a good reason for doing it that way.

I may be the senior reviewing the junior’s code, but they probably spent longer looking at the problem than me and there is a chance that I’m missing something. By suggesting “have you considered this, it may be able to handle x situation better”, you respect their work more.

It depends on context though, if somebody clearly just didn’t understand something obvious, then I’ll just tell them directly.

Either way, probably a difference in our opinions of feedback, you might prefer more directness than me
I took this to mean the assets rather than the code.
My complaint's sort of the opposite of that: that it's superficially polished and fluid language that, if you examine it closely, lacks sense.

I don't think this was written by a thoughtful, careful human writer crossing language barriers. I suspect it's an LLM told to summarize a source material (i.e. the ISRO press release), reword it, and append extra filler language.

(Indeed, there are also some awkward English grammar issues – in the original ISRO press release, which the OP fixes).
I hope that you do get it going with unnamed streams too!
I think you have a really good point here - but have you thought about being a little less abrasive in your phrasing? It can help your point gain acceptance.
Or with literally anything else.
Who said it was fine? I'm telling you (or anyone else) to delete your social media accounts on all platforms. I did that a long time ago and years before the Twitter takeover.
> This does not fall into the fallacy aspect as it is already happening, groups are already being exploited for ulterior motives to control thought. Part of having a background in security research leads one to detect vulnerabilities. This is a gaping vulnerability.

Part of being a minority is being afraid to walk in the streets because you don't know what kind of media a random person has been consuming [1]. Examples like [1] are many and will only become more frequent as some people succumb to hate and others exploit them.

> Let us be clear that inciting violence is criminal and not considered protected speech.

Of course it is, but why won't anyone think of the children, wink wink, nudge nudge. If only there was some hero to save us all from those monsters!

That line of speech is frequent in certain circles and a certain class has been hearing this on repeat for a few years now.

> Less people are dying today than have historically died from hateful conduct. You cannot crush hate out of a society with censorship.

I am not keen on crushing anyone, I am keen on continuing living. Being visibly trans in a backwards country with crazy people is terrifying. I do not recommend.

> Driving hateful behavior underground only emboldens the extremists. Only through education and the ability for an individual to observe how consensus genuinely rejects their hate can you change such attitudes.

What more consensus from broader society does one need than literally telling them that their speech and actions are harmful and they need to stop?

> you are appealing to extremes when you take into account statistics and history.

The funny thing when you think about statistics is that those events that people conveniently aggregate to cutesy little numbers are happening to real people with real friends and families, with their own dreams and aspirations.

For you I am just a statistic, a tiny minority that you can look from afar. But for me, it's my life.

[1] https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/05/23/woman-86-beaten-wheel...
60% of cloud workloads will be built and deployed using CDEs
A small contribution to this big topic from xkcd since I haven't seen it : https://xkcd.com/224/
"they might not want their micromanaging manager to know they helped you outside the scope of their work."

So true.

My manager was telling me it would look good if I contribute outside of the team. I recently spent maybe 15-30 minutes helping another team - not because I was told to but just because it was the right thing to do (I was the only person left with the knowledge). My manager found out then told me that I shouldn't be helping other teams without getting approval, etc. WTF?
Having the tzdata zone at the end, after a space, makes perfect sense. I think you just invented the new standard?

A wall clock / human readable time without a TZ is like a…

…a horse without a field?

…a burger without knowing the meat?

…a photograph of a star without a position?

…a lover without a name? Ok maybe too far.

…a bonus without knowing the currency?
> getting fired seems like a much larger problem than being bad-mouthed online.

I’d argue the opposite: if I’m fired, I can get another job. If I’m bad-mouthed online, that can affect all future job prospects.
If you treat 90% of Republicans like traitors, don't be surprised when they treat 90% of Democrats like traitors. Shoe's going to be on the other foot eventually.
The main reason to buy a ~$500 bike vs. a $100-$200 Huffy at Walmart is that you can't get parts for the Huffy, so you'll be buying a new one every 12 months.

A secondary reason is that they don't seem to make Huffy's for people over ~ 5' 10".

(The $500 bike will probably handle better too, but not 5x better, and I'd recommend getting something more expensive if you can afford it.)

Examples of $100-$200 adult bikes: https://www.walmart.com/browse/sports-outdoors/huffy-bikes/4...

The cheapest repairable "large" adult bikes at a bike chain that is common in SV have a starting non-sale price of $500: https://mikesbikes.com/collections/bikes?sort_by=price-ascen...

Anyway, my point is that if the eBike people prevent you from repairing or customizing your bike by using non-interchangeable parts, then they're asking to be disrupted by low-end landfill bikes.
It's not completely clear from the article, but: are the files generated 'on-the-fly' during the build process (and therefore not in git), or generated once (by AMD), and then committed?
Thank you, updated indirect references to direct: I know it's un-HN but Jesus christ am I tired of hearing this person's garbage quoted ad nauseam like a gospel
The Arab world refers to the Islamic countries in the Middle East I believe. Not any specific country
What if London doesn't exist by the event time?
They have less power over you if you quit. But Facebook shows that just not using it isn't adequate protection.
Yup, time to uninstall TwitX & scrub my account history. if this is not a clear indication of how pervasive this shit is going to be then IDK what is.
In my country it is actually illegal to cover your face. There was a substantial backlash on Islam.

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/gezichtsbedekkende-...
That's the right attitude. It also keeps your local bike mechanic in business, which is a good thing because you really need those in a community that uses bikes. If all the sales and parts flow through centralized companies then those bike mechanics will disappear and then you're done when you need your bike fixed in a hurry because you depend on it.

Van Moof always struck me as targeting the 'hip' crowd without taking into account the whole eco system that a bike manufacturer operates in. Change too many things at once and the end results are predictable.
Absolutely not. It used to be a great email service that didn't let any spam hit my inbox. Now, it's basically only spam.
> or they might not want their micromanaging manager to know they helped you outside the scope of their work

This is me. My boss lays so much on my plate that I legit get talked to when I help other people. I tell them not to tell anyone I helped them
Something like 3-4 days combined I think? It also supports sound but that part is far from perfect, especially the noise channel.
The impression I get from some people I know with PhDs (or equivalent from schools that use different names) is that, in a non-academic/research setting, they feel that emphasizing their degree can come across as a sort of superior attitude working alongside a lot of talented people with various degrees (or lack thereof)—especially to the degree that whatever their thesis was in however many years ago may have next to nothing with what they do today.

I have no particular stake in the question though. Totally understand that people are proud of their achievement.
No, the one I was looking for was a west African woman in Africa, teaching people to learn to read English from scratch.
For sure, but it only takes a few minutes to make the call versus asking folks here to write a letter. Default to action and all that jazz. A call is better than nothing.
Building Profiles with New WebKit API
In that case, biometric data is probably the least of your worries.
> For many people they aren't worried about kids going to a private school, it's whether they can afford to feed someone else.

In a developed country? Even the US (hardly a socialist paradise) has extensive programs to keep children fed. I think that issue is pretty well covered.