skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
None of the use cases you are describing require training a new model. You really don't want to train a new model, that's not a good way of getting them to learn reliable facts and do so without losing other knowledge. The fine tuning for GPT 3.5 suggests something like under a hundred examples.

What you want is to get an existing model to search a well built index of your data and use that information to reason about things. That way you also always have entirely up to date data.

People aren't missing the use cases you describe, they're disagreeing as to how to achieve those.
> Meanwhile French Onion soup hasn't changed much since the Roman era.

I bet it did. Any historical sources to back that up?
Studying span of control, managerial time allocation, and corporate promotion criteria becomes more interesting the further I get into my career. They literally define (or change) companies.
> On balance, this might even be a win for everyone involved

Well, other than the millions of jobs at stake here. But I’m sure they can just learn to code or become an engineer
This seems to underlie their problem: if they're only supporting SciFi (and probably other creative outlets) as a means to an end, as a means to encourage innovation, they're doing it wrong. Asimov didn't write because he foresaw all of the tech entrepreneurs who would read his work, he wrote because he wanted to, and because the society where he wrote supported him—and promoted artistic works (though of course there is perverse incentive for art here in the West, in the form of monetary incentive for artists). If China only supports SciFi to innovate, they won't produce good enough works to innovate.
Connections Between Mathematical Constants: The Conservative Matrix Field [video]
First, I hope that my estimate of hours input into my brain didn't come across as boastful. I'm still working on the balancing act of stating my experience so people get my point of view without sounding arrogant. In this case, I should have also said that sometimes thinking about anything long enough can sometimes cause some of the wonder to fade. Luckily, though, for me, the curiosity remains, just focused in different directions.

Second, your comment above covers the ground I was referring to regarding deduction. It seems like we're on the same page. The main difference may be where one draws the lines. When I said "by themselves sequence to sequence models..." I was excluding algorithms that chain language models together in various ways.

Not too long ago, when people said "AI" that tended to refer to algorithms like forward chaining over a set of facts.
I assume he means quantization (e.g. scaling the weights from 16-bit to 4-bit) and it speeds up the output by reducing the amount of work done.
Minimum Viable Raise
>>We could argue about the meaning of the word "pregnant," but let's be plain. contrary to the original comment, fertilization does occur still at times, and then biology tells us that a new life with its own DNA has entered the picture. (This is why nightly emissions have nothing to do with this, bringing in your other comment.)
That life is intentionally terminated by birth control and the morning-after pill in almost the same exact method as RU-486, which we know as the "abortion drug." Both cause the thinning of the lining of the uterus, preventing attachment or causing the loss of attachment to occur, respectively.

I wish your comment included the importance of sperm and eggs individually to the process of creating life. Any argument you make about life creation should be made hollistically, and drawing the line at the pregnancy because that is near the time medication is administered is a mistake, particularly since that is likely temporary and we will see many other solutions in the future. I'm not sure what you are trying to say by comparing the morning after pill to RU-486 other than you view them the same. That's like saying calling out of work sick the night before and calling out 5 minutes before your shift are the same thing because you used a phone and the result was you didn't go to work, so I'm not sure if that's really what you're implying.

>>Most people who work in the field of abortion know this, and that is precisely why they bring up the loss of birth control as one of the (either intended or unintended) consequences of outlawing abortion.
>In other words, both pro-choice and pro-life people know this is true, and acting like pro-life people are ignoramuses for believing this reveals a real lack of understanding of the science, not to mention the politics, and the moral questions involved.

I don't think most pro-choice or pro-life people know much at all about the subject and are opinionated anyway. As with most contentious political topics.

It would be a mistake to assume that all pro-life people are ignoramuses or lack understanding of science. This bias comes from the media showing pro-lifers purposefully rejecting science historically. The media has also shown many years of pro-choice pretention and that is why none of this reveals a lack of understanding of science as much as it reveals our laziness towards learning truths and our reliance on others to provide talking points that confirm our naive suspicions; especially if they allow you to uninvolve yourself directly with the problem, and that's on both sides without a doubt.
I wonder if we can reliably expect React-in-Rust framework that compiles to wasm instead of js? Or maybe just a React library written in Rust, but you can still write the source code in javascript?

Or maybe at least Typescript-to-WASM compiler to skip JS output?
Yes in all fairness, that is true, it does say that. One is made up of the letters q and t, while the other is made up of the letters q and t.
You can address all of those issues regarding continuity equally as well with actual legal contracts as you can with crypto 'smart' contracts (and you need the legal contracts in either case).
That's good, but following the rules most of the time doesn't make it ok to break them the rest of the time. We have to moderate based on the worst things people post, not the best things.
Tesla's $300M AI Cluster Is Going Live Today
It's literally not a conspiracy, you clearly want to substitute what I'm saying with your own strawman. I'm through, go talk to yourself in a mirror.
That’s IP law, not investment.
This is really nothing new for founders, who have always, generally speaking, wanted to optimize for control. And this path maximizes optionality. Hell even pg promoted the idea of raising a small seed and getting to profitability.

The problem is most early stage VCs don’t play this way. Their game is all about “selling” their investment to the next round up of VCs, who have a specific playbook for what that looks like. Rarely is that aligned with what makes most sense for your company.

Maybe in a post-boom era that’s going to change. Regardless, this blog post isn’t for founders. It’s for other VCs. So good for Terrence Rohan to try and evangelize the idea a little to the fast follow crowd.
If you’re asking about consumer facing products, I’m aware of eBay using it to help sellers write product descriptions. But, I think the bigger immediate use case is making daily work easier inside these companies.

I’ve used it extensively to speed up the process of making presentations, drafting emails, naming things, rubber-ducking for coding, etc.
I wasn't in the church, so the details I am a little short of, but they had something like a tiered system where everyone had cards like on a cruise ship. So you could get some things here, but not things from there, with a limit. It seems not unlikely that they had to separate the donation from the transaction, but there was still a "transaction-like" activity there. I'm honestly not sure if that church is still around, but it was enormous.
online edition of 507 Mechanical Movement.[0][1]

book : https://www.amazon.com/Mechanical-Engineering-Makers-Hands-D...

Youtube search "mechanial movement" shows quite a bit of material. (concepts & examples)

[0] : http://wiki.dtonline.org/index.php/507_Mechanical_Movements

[1] : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbyf87MC4fY
I agree. However, with most other manufacturers there are options beyond the dealerships. In contrast, Tesla is notable for the lack of spare parts available to the public (making DIY repairs difficult) and a relative lack of third-party specialist garages.
No, because your $1 million pencil was never on the market; your hypothetical self-sale was a fake transaction. With NFTs it was often deceptively represented that someone paid $1 million, disguising the fact that these were bogus self-sales.
I mean probably, yeah, but why? You'd still need JS to involve the DOM with anything, and that's the performance expensive stuff, so might as well just do the whole thing in JS.
Into k8s? I do like Argo/flux as it’s declarative. It works for most normal use cases. I would recommend that if you have a typical use case go with that first. Declarative and pull based deploys are quite powerful.

For local/hybrid stuff there’s things like Tilt that can be combined with a push based approach that is a simple helm install.

If you have something fancy though you’ll probably have to write some custom orchestration pushed based tooling. I would reach for a tool like Dagster, Prefect or Temporal for that kind of thing.

You probably don’t need custom orchestration tooling unless you’re doing multi tenant multi cloud deployments though. Even terraform is a decent deploy tool if you don’t want to go all in on helm/flux/argo etc. I would especially recommend that approach if your use cases are not fancy and you already use terraform. It would be push based but still declarative and quite simple to use, albeit clunky and a bit slow like everything terraform.
> we quickly learned how sensitive enterprises are when it comes to sharing their data

"They're huge pussies when it comes to security" - Jan the Man[0]

[0] https://memes.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/b3fc68bb-5b53-456d-aec5-4...
Beside the elegance and historical significance of airships, I don't get the advantage compared to a quad drone. If multiple cameras are needed, why not launch multiple drones? Simply tell the drones to platoon with the leader.
Total rent seeking.
Usually we warn people before banning them, and often many times, but sometimes an account has been breaking the site guidelines so badly and so frequently that we just ban them. When I scrolled through your comment history I saw so many cases of this that you fell into the latter category.

Example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37210786 - you can't post like that here, no matter how wrong someone is or you feel they are, and even a quick glance at the rules (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) ought to have made that clear.

It doesn't have to be permanent, if you genuinely want to use HN as intended—that's what I tried to explain above.
the further away from the product you look, the less the company as a whole will manage to care.

but these things have a bad habit of forming loop-like structures, turning back in on themselves.
Creating production-ready data pipelines and warehouses as a semi-technical user
The Enchanting LoFi Textures of an Optical Sound Sampler [video]
"Everybody who disagrees with me is a conspiracy theorist, even if they explicit say there is no conspiracy. Also they're biased but of course I'm not."
Hans Niemann's War with Chess.com over Cheating Scandal Comes to an End
The PostgreSQL manual is pretty good and if you're going to use that database you'd better read it and then read it again and read it again.

See also this guy's books

https://www.amazon.com/stores/Joe-Celko/author/B000ARBFVQ?re...
> All cloud features are opt-in and your data is encrypted at rest. For autocomplete, all of your keystrokes are processed locally and never leave your device.

Fig is a great product.
> What is "reasonable," what is "fair." These words signify a death spiral in wage discussions.

Another commenter commented on a burger-joint giving a share to "climate" causes. What a share entails in this case, whether it comes from profit, or whether they pass the cost of this cause to the customer is unknown.

Additionally I live in a place where there are reparations discussions and where unions agreed that teachers of a certain ethnicity would be eliminated first in the name of equity if it came down to staff cuts.

How does this play into the scenario if these types of events happen more often, even discussing these things is difficult and people could veer away from. I heard that Amazon inserted "woke" discussions into union talks in Georgia in an effort to de-rail them, not to engender unity.
Interesting have you ever been able to control your actions in your dreams?
"If the Antarctic Ice Sheet melted entirely, it would raise global sea levels by around 200 feet (60 meters)"

Cool, I live 62 meters above sea level.

It says something that the first three or so sea level rise visualizers I found don't go as high as 60 meters.
The example has sort of derailed the conversation with many commenters here jumping to advise on how to solve your specific problem.

Speaking to the actual question - my own observation is that the “hardness” of something is entirely subjective. We have a physics math phd in my company who sees 3D modeling as hard because it is so tedious and dependent on clicking around UI’s. Under the same roof we have a couple of 3D modellers who spend all their time clicking away and they see all the complex math and physics simulation and it’s all tedious gibberish to them. One can’t imagine doing the other job.

Many people find the thing they do sort of easy. Many people make judgements about adjacent disciplines and think “I could do that”.

But generally yeah - I would agree that FED is hard and in many ways comprised of layers standards and strange caveats. But they do say that’s the case for any expertise-driven domain.
There's a typical presumed business intuition that any large company will confer business to a host of "satellite companies" who offer some offshoot of the product's value proposition but catered to a niche sector. Most of these are however just "OpenAI API + a prefix prompt + user interface + marketing". The issue is (which has been brought up since the release of the GPT-3 API 3 years ago) that no startup can offer much more value than the API alone offers, and thus it's easier, comparatively, than in analogous cases of this type of startup model with other larger companies in the past, for OpenAI to capitalize on this business
I personally believe that I've been in a short-lived "wet bulb" situation twice in my life. In both cases, in the Amazon, pretty much at the equator, at some of the hottest days of the year. 40-45C, humidity near a 100.

A cold shower does nothing, it actually makes it worse as it activates your body to warm up. Stripping naked does nothing. Sweat just streams down the entire body as if a tap is open. It's near impossible to keep up with drinking water.

It was short-lived as the weather was extremely variable, but the feeling of being completely unable to cool down despite throwing everything and the kitchen sink at it, is memorable.
This article goes back and forth from Autopilot and Self driving. Which are totally different systems. I cannot even read this article.
My dishwasher does not come close to doing 90% of clearing the table, washing the dishes, drying and putting them away.

My laundry machine is certainly better than by hand, but folding laundry and putting it away is significant.
That's not how anything works.

You aren't a stock holder.

They are not beholden to you.

You are donating money.

They run the org they decide what's best to accomplishing their goals.

If you don't like it, don't donate.
This is either AI-genweated or lazy outsourcing. Microsoft docs explain the exact same content with far fewer injected ads.
IMO agile didn't turn out to be a fad. Rather it became so normalized (in some form, not necessarily a pure one) that it's just not a hot topic any more.
Interactive Map of European Continental Divides
Ah, I see. Sorry if I made the wrong call about that. I definitely do not always get it right.
You don't have to atomically update a hash table and the queue. You can first insert into the queue, then update the hash table.

The article does seem to make assumptions that there is a lockless hash table and a lockless queue. It clarified that the lockless queue need not support removal from the middle.
It's getting interesting, dollar per dollar.

e.g. the JH7110 and TH1520 devices at around Raspberry Pi 4 price are IMHO a better deal.

Relative to the Pi 4, the CPU can be lower power (JH7110) or faster (TH1520), whereas GPU, video codecs, crypto acceleration, RAM and periphals are better in both.
Reminds me of https://www.globalfoodscapes.org/explore-map
Huh, I must have just got lucky back in mid-May, either in terms of Hyundai's priority-list for different models, or else in terms of service-appointment scheduling. (Depending on what blocker you're referring to.)

> I went retro with “the club”.

I'm still keeping "the club" though: I mean, I've already got it, and it may help deter someone from breaking my window before they realize it won't start for them.

At one point I was drawing up plans to install a hidden kill-switch against the ignition/starter system, including buying a cheap radio-controlled switch with its own little fob.

I also considered a kill-switch on the fuel pump instead, however that seems riskier since any mistakes could cause problems while driving, as opposed to just problems starting.
It was the hazard posed to the people piloting the craft.
I got a number of these notices from financial institutions. They of course said "your information may or may not have been compromised." I read this is "my information was compromised or you wouldn't be sending me this notice."

Of course they offered one or two years, depending on the institution, of "basic credit monitoring." Of course they go on to say "this will provide no protection, if you want identity protection, contact us for third party protection services that you can purchase."

So, basically, no liability as usual.

One is my mortgage company, being the amount of money they've collected from me as well as what they will collect in the future, I would have thought it a gesture of good will to offer that protection gratis.

However I wonder, even if they offered two years of identity protection (similar to their credit monitoring offer), what stops these badniks from selling my data 3, 5 or 10 years down the line? So once something like this happens, one is never in the clear are they?
> Can anyone translate this from meme to English please?

"ChatGPT, invent some jargon to make people who've bought in feel like insiders, while making ungullible people^W^W I mean haters keep a safe distance."
A Week in the Life of a Team During the New York Times Annual Hackathon
You could buy one on eBay. When I moved to the US, I had to leave my beloved Apple //c behind, but I was able to just buy one here for less than $100
He suddenly jumps from "making games easier for people who find them too hard" to "making games trivially easy for everyone" like its a natural conclusion. To me the natural conclusion is maximizing flow: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow_(psychology)
I...don't see how your analogy is any more or less flawed...but I also don't particularly want to debate about an analogy that aptly demonstrates a point: specializations exist.
I don't really care though. I don't always want more more more. I have enough.

The only thing that's really crazy expensive is housing but that follows GDP anyway, the real issue is shortage. I even took a pay cut to move to a lower-wage country with higher quality of life. Slower pace, better weather, better infrastructure and social services. I don't even need a car now because public transport is amazing where I live and I really enjoy not having to worry about one.

But what I want from my job is stability and security. Not golden mountains in the distance if I work myself down to the bone.
at this point the discussion is devolving to a semantics debate, and it may not even be the case that the word license has such specific definition, hence why courts are required to adjudicate and the outcome of such cases cannot be predicted. However, I'm pretty sure my interpretation is more accurate.

Here, quoting from the GPL itself: "You may make, run and propagate covered works that you do not convey, without conditions so long as your license otherwise remains in force."

This is referring to a copy that you have already made, and they are pointing out that you have a license to that copy, and your license to that copy could go out of force.

>8. Termination. You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to propagate or modify it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License

again we see, it's not that the license's job was done after the copy was made, but that the license on an ongoing basis is what allows you to maintain your rights to the copy.

The first sale doctrine isn't a separate doctrine than copyright and license law, it is a subset, and applies to you transferring your licensed copy to a new person. Were it not for that, you license would not transfer.

>Sorry, but that's absurd.

no, it's not absurd that if A requires B, and B requires C, that implies that A requires C, it's a fundamental principle of mathematics/logic, modus ponens or something.
I just held down the "enter" key on my keyboard. Less than 2 minutes to get through all of Moby Dick.
HN exists in spite of itself.
I imagine we won't know because of HIV's long life in the body, properly medicated. No one is willing to run a study to determine that, as it essentially sentences the control group to death.
VC economics is different than a thriving business. They generally want 10x or nothing. Having a 2x or 3x business is enough to make a founder wealthy and fulfilled but VCs won't be interested.
This reminds me of generational garbage collectors. They typically have a nursery where new objects are allocated in, and a small number of generations, whereby every object that survives a garbage collection is promoted to an older generation. Here we also have essentially two queues for that.
As far as "malicious" goes, this is like paying with an expired coupon for your discounted lunch. I've seen 100x worse in businesses like social apps. The guy seems kind of insecure by overexaggerating the maliciousness aspect of it. I'd say he's being too hard on himself for following what's ultimately standard business tactics.
Why do we keep seeing more and more political articles on the front page of HN lately?
I'm guessing that a hydrogen airship can cover a significantly larger area with less power than a drone.
Terms of the acquisition, most likely. Existing customers are worth $x/yr. New customers with the new product are worth $y/yr. Finance doesn't want $x competing with $y. Something something financial models making the deal worth what they paid, so closing registration is simply part of the deal that was signed.
Cruise Robotaxi Collides with Turning Semi-Truck in San Francisco
The categorization of developers into just 'front-end' and 'back-end' is an oversimplification that doesn't capture the full spectrum of roles in software development. There are many other specializations such as full-stack developers, who touch several different layers including the UI, as well as DevOps engineers, who focus on the deployment, monitoring, and maintenance of applications. Moreover, a large percentage of roles are more specialized like data engineers, security engineers, mobile app developers, and more.
> This filter makes non-potable water cleaner such that it won't kill you/make you seriously ill.

I'd hesitate to even say that much; there are a lot of dangerous contaminants (like organic toxins or heavy metals) which this filter won't touch.