skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In fact, I'm working on something alike Ghostfolio but that uses ledger as database. It's very much early stage and mostly proof of concept and hacked together scripts. But I'm moving it to both "tabula" and "bullboard":

https://github.com/berkes/bullboard-rs
https://github.com/berkes/tabula

Again: early. But tabula is my consolidation of random "beancount/ledger" stuff regarding running my small business and startup. And bullboard my consolidation of random "beancount/ledger" stuff regarding everything investment related. The latter is just a CLI tool for now, and barely works. But once the businesslogic is done, I plan to add a web-interface alike ghostfolio to it. A tad simpler, I think, though.
One thing that I would like to see is tax impact analysis though this is naturally very country-specific.

For example I would like to calculate the impact of wash sale or seeing the tax impact for selling from certain lot (in terms of short/long term taxes). And if you did these what would your tax impact look like if you sold things at expected mark growth rate (or certain value you set).
Hi, 1999 called. Today, people are more along the lines of "What's a call?"

The old rule was congress critters weighted a personal letter with highest weight over a form letter, over a call, over an email. Now, staffers are of younger age, and they are the gate keepers of what gets passed along. So that order of weighting may be different now. Then again, that's probably also highly dependent on the specific congress critter. AOC may be much more open to tweets/emails/etc vs Mitch McConnell or similar aged someone
Yes, you can use all resources available to you. Most challenges involve some amount of programming.
Call for Papers I'd guess
I'm not sure if you're aware that 3-5C is perfectly within the business-as-usual scenarios and 5C is easily a civilization-ending trend.
omelet : eggs :: cause : martyrs
There's currently a draft document for such a format [0], called IXDTF (the Internet Extended Date/Time Format). It allows you to specify a timezone (as a tz name) in brackets following an RFC 3339 string. To give a local time, you have to specify your best estimate of the UTC offset alongside the bracketed timezone. For instance, "2030-07-01 18:00:00 Europe/London" would be "2030-07-01T18:00:00+01:00[Europe/London]".

If the UK changes its rules before that time, then the timestamp becomes "inconsistent" (see section 3.4). The behavior on an inconsistent timestamp is left for the application to decide, but if a ! character is included within the brackets before the timezone name, then it's at least obligated to detect the problem instead of blindly following the UTC offset:

> In case of inconsistent time-offset and time zone suffix, if the critical flag is used on the time zone suffix, an application MUST act on the inconsistency. If the critical flag is not used, it MAY act on the inconsistency. Acting on the inconsistency may involve rejecting the timestamp, or resolving the inconsistency via additional information such as user input and/or programmed behavior.

This extended timestamp format is used in the proposed Temporal library for JavaScript [1] (though I'm not sure if it supports the ! character). The ZonedDateTime.from() parsing function [2] takes an optional "offset" parameter to allow the user to control which part of an inconsistent timestamp takes precedence. It also supports simply omitting the UTC offset and using only the timezone, but it warns that this is ambiguous for times in the repeated hour during a DST transition.

[0] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sedate-datetime-e...

[1] https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/docs/strings.html#iana-tim...

[2] https://tc39.es/proposal-temporal/docs/ambiguity.html#ambigu...
46 Light Minutes is pretty much the maximum, that's 827,427,184 Kilometers round trip which is a bit beyond the maximum distance to Mars so there's some processing delays thrown in there.
You can buy a basic Specialized with all standard parts for $500 (ish) on sale without an issue; I just did for my child’s first MTB. Nothing oddball on it, and it was available from XS to XL.

Everything in it is solid quality; Shimano hubs, aluminum hoops, micro shift drivetrain, threaded BB, decent headset and fork.
That seems so counter productive
Weightlifting might help heal trauma through a sense of mind-body connection
An agreement, basically.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Compact
I imagine that (at least) 2 things have happened to Google Search.

1. SEO content farmers have filled it up with low quality results.

2. Google used ML to tune the system and it optimized for the lowest common denominator, incompetent searchers.

The average person never learned how to construct succinct search queries and so habitually enters too little or too much into the search box. Current Google Search wants to help the poor searcher so it adjusts their entry, or in some cases rewrites it completely, before processing it and returning results it has decided that they really want.

edit for clarity
Not true. The 6000 copycat “journalists” aren’t going to be able to find quality advertisers for their chatgpt garbage mill / copyright infringement site.

Today, they get paid the same as the original journalists, specifically because ad auctions are designed to transfer all wealth to the middlemen, and therefore commoditized content creation and distribution.
By curiosity how do you deal with generic instructions ? Like if you needed to have "you will need to come to this counter to apply for special discounts" printed next to a ticketing machine ?
> Learn to recognize signals for slop. Slick well-produced video channels with multiple people working for them will tend to become slop

Right. I really wish there was some “average joe” filter. The noise/signal ratio would surely still be high, but a hell of a lot more manageable than the inauthentic and affiliate nonsense that gets gamed for the algorithm.

Obviously anecdotal but my favorite review videos all r ones by someone recording off their laptop, all with a noticeable noise floor. It’s unfortunate that the very well produced vids seem to be negatively correlated with quality of substance, so I’ll keep sticking with my annoying noise floor videos
unfortunately both minimum wage and the median national salary also represent a shrinking slice of the pie, just at different rates.

What we should have is a % of per capita GDP but that's kind of a radical idea that could never go anywhere.
Stackexchange is definitely NOT a forum. It is not for discussions. If there is a debate then it means the question is not well posed.
It is values not censorship to say that you value protecting people from harmful speech in a private company.
I never said I wouldn’t. At the end of the day I’ll use whatever is the easiest/best. I’m just hoping not to have to do a bunch of rework.
This really begs the question, when they removed the policy why did they not remove all the existing blocks and labels? Sounds fishy to me.
There is nothing stopping people from obtaining other sources of income if their one employer is unwilling to pay them 1.5x their regular payrate.
I was frustated with the sheer amount of essays I was helping out my nephew with. It felt like every single week he had an essay from multiple classes, and it was always the same b.s for every single one. I just couldn't see the point of having to do so many of the same type of "research" assignment over and over again.

When chatgpt beta first became available I was overjoyed, it worked wonders. It worked so well that I figured teachers would have to let go of the essay crutch they had been relying on so much.
For some reason even as someone hungry for some distributed socializing, I haven't been compelled to try nostr at all. Who hangs out there?
I remember Noam Chomsky being critical decades ago of the major news channels and saying that due to the nature of commercial TV, speech is restricted to soundbites making authentic analysis and criticism inherently difficult for the left. The response by most right wingers was "Those are private companies they can do what they want".

When social media companies put the clamp down on some of these violence peddling wing nuts like Alex Jones, all the right wingers said their freedom of speech was "violated". All the previous talk saying "They're public companies they can do what they want" went right out the window on the right.

Elon Musk is a walking one man government contract. Him buying Twitter should demonstrate that free market ideology is a farce and always has been. The intertwine of Government and big business should become more crystalized when a billionaire buys "the public square". Instead, the opposite has happened and right wingers and libertarians double down on their ideology while hyping up a phony sensationalist narrative that Elon is really exposing corruption!

How many right wingers or libertarians are advocating for systemic change to get money out of politics? Is Elon? No - because he believes money is free speech, he has the most money so he has the most free speech. Until that is addressed, then the rest of this talk is fluff.
I'm seeing a lot of fascist dictatorial, and authoritarian things being 'proposed' by the UK government lately. Seems like they're sleepwalking into a China style Big Brother, Orwellian state. </long-sigh>
How many of those people still work at IBM, do you suppose?
The purpose of education is not labor preparation :)
Because its confusing. Don't say that you like something when you don't. It's a failure to communicate.
That's just not true. What do you think happens when the catcher goes to talk to the pitcher? It's not just strategy.

"Good eye" "good hustle" "you got this" "we got em on the next one"-- good teammates find lots of ways to support their teammates and keep morale up.
Anything worth paying for will be limited by real world factors --- one way or another.

Suggesting otherwise is unrealistic and thus false advertising.
https://sdf.org/?faq?USENET?03

Not free, but a few dollars for ARPA membership for life is good.
You'll need a ton (well, probably several tons) of water.

https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/1336/what-thicknes...

^^ Interesting read on this very topic.
Totally!

The parts where the organization is notifying its users:

"Sorry, a giant AI is using all of our bandwidth" reminded me of several conversations I've had with networking teams over the years.
If you're not intimately familiar with GPU drivers and what goes on this gives you a very quick, back-of-the-envelope of the size and complexity of the work involved. 1/7th the size and complexity of the kernel for this one driver.

I raised an eyebrow but I have only the vaguest notion of how the hardware works and what a driver might have to manage.
We got the birds version of this since we're bird watchers. A fun little kit and decently accurate in the confines of lego. A fun couples activity to build it and sits nicely on the shelf. Wish there was more and they were a little cheaper.
There's only one reason, and it's that you don't really want children.
I'll share my reason. It's phony as hell. If someone is legitimately angry or disappointed with my performance, just say it. Don't construct a "compliment sandwich" and patronize me with that.
I kind of agree, I don’t want to work with a HR robot. I know someone that talks like this to non-coworker friends and it’s honestly just… offputting.

I’m more into “ehhh honestly not how I would do it. The {problem} will cause issues down the road”. And that opens up a two ended respectful conversation. Someone telling that to me, I’m not going to think they’re being an asshole.

I’ve learned a lot from people stopping me from firing a footgun directly into my… foot.
That’s why I was curious about utilization since you mentioned low memory usage. I believe time slicing can work on those smaller cards these days. Did you explore any other optimizations like batching or concurrency for same model?

Model heterogeneity seems like a real challenge there — you could optimize usage if you know all the sizes ahead of times and actually have gpu capacity to do efficient allocations, but it’s way harder than just doling 1 gpu per pod.

e: also, latency because of reduced resources? Or what do you mean?
The original problem with social media is how content is algo-recommended to people from others they don't directly know, creating a popularity contest often won by dumb things like ragebait, bots, etc. Mastodon doesn't fix the problem, and small forums only avoid it until they become big.
That a what usenet was
I know we can all think of people being unreasonable, but I don't trust that its the norm, given my own experiences in trying to get out of the rent cycle and others I've talked to.

We aren't all trying to get 3 bed w/ a yard and amenities in the ultra desirable neighborhoods. I'd take a 2 bedroom in a safe neighborhood that maybe even doesn't have a yard (or has a really small one) and I can't even come at that reasonably

EDIT: I work and live in a Tier 2 city where home prices are a median of 500K. This isn't SF, Manhattan or Seattle etc.
Electric Cars Are the Future. But Renting One? Good Luck
Likely not a reason, just a mistake.

I don't see the reason for deliberately doing it.
Don't be seen through then. Actually appreciate your co-workers and see the good qualities in them.

Some of y'all are really overthinking the example. If you ever said:

>very fast solution, but you missed this edge case

It's the exact same format. I can praise the performance while also acknowledging that there may be some correctness issues (hopefully not such a nasty edge case performance falls off the cliff, but it happens).
It's not a necessity, but also understandable that if you had that experience yourself you might feel you've failed as a parent if you can't provide that same experience (or better) for your child.

Of course in reality that's not true.
I'm flattered to see they have a page advertising it as an alternative to ProjectionLab (disclosure: I made that).

Though I haven't yet seen a part of this tool that makes projections. Did I miss that?
https://archive.ph/ctRII
If anyone is interested in seeing how a river returns after dams are removed look into the Upper Elwha and Glines Canyon dams in Washington. The changes in the last 10 years are pretty incredible.

There are also cool videos of the dams actually being demolished.
There isn't any clear definition out there of what "social media" is I'm aware of, but I'd say the basic criteria include some combination of:

- User-submitted content

- Individualized experience based on algorithmic curation, follows/subscriptions, or both

- Ability to directly interact with other users, whether publishing to some kind of profile or "wall" of theirs or sending direct messages

- Users have some kind of durable persona (at minimum a human-readable, memorable account name, but usually a multimedia profile of some sort)

Hacker News mostly has none of these things. A very small proportion of top-level content is user-created and there is algorithmic curation, but not individualized. This is really more of a newspaper without writers or editors. The stories come from other platforms instead and every reader's letter gets published automatically.

Reddit isn't social media, either. It's a discussion board. There has to be something that made MySpace and Facebook different from phpBB and Usenet or why'd we come up with a new word at all? People seem to be using "social media" as a general derogatory name for any potentially addictive, high-noise, low-signal time sink that encourages mindless consumption of undifferentiated "content" and creates bad incentives to creators of such content to abandon truth and artistic integrity in favor of flashy gimmicks and trend surfing.

But that describes virtually all of pop culture.
Interesting. Our tracks are plastic. They must have improved it.

I did have to disassemble it and untangle the string from the spool and motor once after initial setup.
Again, that is not important for my argument. It only matters that some are concerned.
do you think they would publicly state they had done it, if they did?
> Every time I hear "content creator" I perceive it as Styrofoam. Filler used to convey a product.

This is so good. Perfect. I love it.
Rented e-scooters cleared from Paris streets on eve of ban
Next time, just ignore the post.

Excellent advice.
"Real" wealth management has a lot more legal work behind it since a non trivial portion of wealth management are topics like inheritance and planing for the next generation. Also wealth management is more focused on wealth preservation than generating high returns, that is more the focus of asset management (e.g. hedge funds, private equity etc.). But since this piece of software is focused on the individual the term seems applicable even though something like personal finance would be more suitable. For "real" wealth management you hire usually professionals. It has a lot of good and bad sides that a majority of people think that when it comes to finance they can compete on an equal level with experts who do this every day. But if your skilled you surely save a ton of fees.
It's extremely difficult to get reddit banned, let alone this - OP is telling on themselves
Ah I see what you mean, but live-attenuated might be quite different from the mRNA vaccines. I wonder if the study authors at the outset expected the impact to be similar.

What I find dismaying is that this tiny study is the first and only examination of the impact on broader immune response from the mRNA vaccines (at least, that I have been able to find) after millions of doses were already administered.
No, I don’t. Also that’s how we prove literally anything. There is always a model, because we don’t have direct access to reality. So if your bar is that high you’re going to have to call climate change and relativity a bit of an overreach too.
> Oh this is interesting, I didn't know about this historical detail.

That's the characterisation I got from Peter Smith's book about Gödel's theorems. I didn't verify original sources or anything, but it sounds very plausible to me.

And it also kind of answers the question about why we should care: if a system can't prove its own consistency, well that's not terribly interesting (even if it could, we would have to believe the system a priori to trust its own consistency proof). But if it also can't prove a stronger system consistent, then that's much more interesting.

> Great minds think alike?

That would be a bit too self-aggrandizing for me. :D I'm very curious about logic (and maths in general), that's why I know some stuff about it, but I'm no maths genius.
Is there a way to write that title with genders?
Stripe Shutdown Our Nonprofit's Account, Holding $12k in Donations Hostage
Our founder woke up to a gut-wrenching email from Stripe today, reading "We're writing to you because, after conducting a routine review of your Stripe account for Integrate for Good (account ID: [**]), we've found that it presents a high level of risk for customer disputes." We're a very small, hyper local nonprofit and have been using Stripe without any significant issues for over four years. Radar has flagged only one charge in the past year, and we've had just a single dispute since opening our account.

We requested further review of our account and supplied Stripe with further information in the dashboard. Just 45 minutes later, we received a second email confirming their decision to close our account. I find it hard to believe that Stripe was able to "conduct another review of [our] account" in such a short span of time.

While trying to figure out what could possibly present "a high level of risk for customer disputes," only one recent, major incident comes to mind. About two months ago, we experienced a security breach where an unauthorized user gained access to the account owner's Stripe login. They attempted to send six large invoices, of which only two went through. We promptly resolved the issue by resetting passwords and multi-factor authentication, and we refunded the wrongful charges. We contacted Stripe support to ensure everything was in order.

Support was helpful, they said they would escalate the issue and ensure everything was fine. A few days later, the owner's login was disabled by the security team. Getting it enabled again took nearly two months of trying to get in touch with support. Stripe was emailing us, but the emails were going into the ether. The attack hit the owner's inbox as well, as rules were configured to delete all incoming emails from Stripe, something Stripe support caught!

Once we sorted out that mess, we discovered Stripe withheld over $12,000 in donations while the login was disabled. The funds were scheduled to be released today, the same day the account was cancelled. That's $12,000 of donations people have made that we can't access. We are very small, and very much need access to that money to keep our programs running. It took months for us to get there, but only 45 minutes for Stripe to decide to kill our account.

We want to figure out what's going on and how to resolve this, but Stripe has disabled both live chat and phone support for our account. (I'm still able to use those options in other Stripe accounts under the same login).

Overnight, we've gone from planning our largest annual fundraiser, to considering pulling the plug altogether. We are incredibly frustrated by the complete and utter lack of transparency, the inability to contact Stripe, and absolute hopelessness we're feeling. If anyone knows someone we can hop on a call to discuss this situation with, please leave details or contact us at:
Founder & Executive Director: bev@integrateforgood.org
Director of Technology (me): nick@integrateforgood.org
If You think it's bad now, wait until Starship starts dumping hundreds of tons of space probes all over.

The obvious solution is more big antennas on Earth and network if store-and-forward relays all over the Solar System.

I predict they'll get cheap instead of fixing it.
Yes, it makes no sense
A decade getting too much (frankly poor) content instead of not enough of beloved characters/worlds/etc totally devaluing the product.
Social media seems to be pushing a bunch of content that isn't the people that I actively follow. Twitter, I mean X keeps switching me back to the "For You" tab, and Facebook changed their page/group interface that switches my profile out every time I don't pay attention for a second and I see a feed of random. I can't speak for any of the rest as I generally don't use much else.

Given that case, of course I'm less likely to engage on social media. I'm much less there to interact with random strangers. Of course so many people don't go out and do anything anymore, don't engage with people around them when they do, and may be put off if on the other side. It's a really weird time to be alive to say the least. And that doesn't even get into culture issues that most people don't care about, but those that are active in social media are nearly obsessed about (including myself at times).
What does this point to- https://urlis.net/npi7rk3q?

Can't access it. Could you please share the original link or a link that works?
I think his argument is exactly that, those formal systems can suffer from errors (even though they've been checked), because the compiler could have errors, the processor could have errors, etc

So in the end, it's always a question of "community" and "belief that things seen by sufficiently many people are right", eg that after 10 years of using a CPU, we've identified and fixed most bugs, and so the program is even more likely to be valid
From the article: “Oxygen-28 might prompt physicists to revamp theories of how atomic nuclei are structured.”

If the theories are incomplete or wrong, how could we accurately simulate things we don’t yet understand? It doesn’t matter how powerful the computer is.