skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, I’m questioning it… not that it really matters.

-1, 0, and 1 are no good.

Two divisors for positive integer X:
1, X

I recently demonstrated GPT-4 via by having it explain phases of matter metaphorically with animals. Though impressive, it points to loose abstraction being more in range than firm abstraction. Let’s get that model a python interpreter and see how far we can take this party. Until then, I’m going to stick to explaining concepts.

————- included here for fun

Alright! Let's dive into the wild world of matter using some animal friends as examples:

1. *Solids* - Think of solids like a herd of elephants standing closely together. The elephants are packed in tight, barely moving, just maybe swaying a bit. They're sturdy and strong, just like solid things in our world. This is because the particles in a solid don't move around much; they just vibrate in place.

2. *Liquids* - Imagine a school of fish swimming in a pond. They're free to move around, weaving in and out, but they still stay pretty close to each other. They aren't packed as tightly as our elephant friends, but they aren't completely free either. This is like liquids: the particles are close, but they can move around and flow, just like water in a glass.

3. *Gases* - Now, picture a flock of birds soaring in the sky, free to fly in all directions. These birds aren't sticking close to one another; they're spread out, enjoying the vast space of the sky. In gases, the particles are like these birds, very spread out and moving all over the place.

4. *Plasma* - Think of plasma like dragons (I know they're mythical, but bear with me). These dragons breathe fire, and that fire is so hot and energetic that it can change the way things behave. Plasma is like that – it's gas that's become so hot that the particles are super energized and can even glow, like neon lights.

5. *Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC)* - This one's a bit trickier, but imagine penguins in Antarctica. They huddle closely together to keep warm. BEC is like the coldest group of particles ever, where they start acting in strange, uniform ways, almost like one giant super-particle. It's like all the penguins moving together as one.

So, next time you think of matter, just remember our animal friends: the sturdy elephants, the flowing fish, the free-flying birds, the fiery dragons, and the huddled penguins!
I love the Surface tablets! Runs Windows, Linux (WSL), and Android (WSA) so covers almost any use-case I'd need. Stick to the ones with Intel processors for maximum compatibility.
All macbooks come with min 16gb now, except maybe macbook air.
> the stray cats I fed

No. Please don't.
I've seen a bit of discussion lately about EPSS[0], which is a model that tries to take more practical metrics about any given CVE (including pieces of the CVSS, but also things like whether there's a GitHub PoC or if it's up on ExploitDB) and return a real-world exploitability score out of 100.

I can't help but imagine something like this is where we're headed, given how counterproductive it can be to make decisions based on CVSS scores...

[0]: https://www.first.org/epss/model
>Australia ... lawless

OK buddy
Write GIMP scripts to make image processing faster (2021)
Yes, Mandarin, Cantonese, Hakka, Hokkien, etc., as they're all derived from Old Chinese and share its script.
This was really good. The only thing I didn't see explicitly discussed, although I guess it's obvious, is that what's different 33 years later is the inputs the models operate on. The '89 sota model used 16x16 greyscale images, today we have single digit megapixel color images, in 30 years, a desktop will be able to train Clip in 90 seconds, but what will the sota models be trained on?
Could someone explain this better? The definition in the wiki page appears to be leaving out some information that makes it necessary to understand.

Why is 2 + 2 + 1 = 5 not sufficient? It doesn't say unique proper divisors. The definition of proper divisors doesn't seem to explain either.

i.e. why is 10 not an untouchable number but 5 is?

Specifically given the precise definition given, anything should be touchable as 1 is a proper divisor, and you can sum any number of 1s to "touch" a number. Clearly we're missing some implicit restriction.
If Facebook were to implement a language model inside the platform now it would raise a lot of privacy issues. By publishing free to use models they can rely on others to do the work of training the society into using such tools at mass scale. So by the time they adopt in in all their services there will be much less backlash.
I collected some resources on this. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36195527
Why isn’t it sufficient to follow up with MRI scans to ensure the cancer (assuming a tumour) isn’t growing ?.
I always just thought it was because my cat isn't smart enough to differentiate between "can noise, human making tuna sandwich" and "can noise, human is dispensing cat food."

To me, the weird thing is that my cat knows the sound of a can opener at all.

We got her when she was waaaaay too young. Someone abandoned her on the vet's doorstep. She has never known that a can opener means food because for her entire life, she has been fed canned food with a pop-top.

But still, when I pull out the can opener to open some vegetables, she comes running.

I have no idea why, but it's one of those things that makes me think that knowledge can be encoded in DNA and passed down through generations.
Yes absolutely please do!
This doesn't make sense to me. You make it sound like a rosy cooperative relationship where advertisers want to follow the rules and regulators just haven't made them. Even so, regulation isn't "complete control" in any way. It seems more like the advertisers are always going to try to make the advertisements as effective as possible while toeing the letter of the law as closely as possible and ignoring the spirit of the law completely. What are you actually trying to say here?
I'm not up on the rules, but that's per user, right? Not for the whole account?
That's not quite right. The license never gets revoked. Once over a certain size, the company will not receive licenses to new versions/releases.
Warrantless search of a locked phone is one thing (and should be illegal also at borders).

Warrantless search of a lock phone of an immigration attorney (!) who travels under a pre-approved government program is quite another. This creates the suspicion that they perhaps did not honor the "privileged filtering", and wanted information about one of his clients.

Those people should not travel to "such states" (USA, GB, AU, ZH) carrying smartphones, get a pack of Nokia 110 Dual-Sim non-smart phones at $40 a piece, all they can do is make calls [EDIT: and play "Snake"]. Before getting on a place, clear the call log. Don't store client phone number in contacts.
Untrue wrt prostate cancer. Since the average date it’s detected is 70 and 2/3rds of the population is obese, then of course most people will die of something else. If you are non-obese and in good shape, then get aggressive treatment.
I know what you mean. It's a desire to simplify in the name of progress, not stopping to think if simpler is better. I don't think it is in every case.

There's a great book of Sony's 90s design that you should check out. Highlights: https://twitter.com/gingerbeardman/status/163686795858357043...
Exactly.

The iPad isn't for multimedia production like podcasting or for connecting niche peripherals to.

But if you just want to write and e-mail and Zoom and read(+annotate) and watch, it's fantastic.

I just use a Bluetooth (Magic) keyboard with mine for writing in coffee shops and it's great. And the Pencil is a godsend for highlighting and annotating PDF's.
Correction... I meant radius of 47 billion light years. It's about 94 billion light years across!
The Bayesian Base Rate fallacy is the key here.

"Suppose that at your regular physical exam you test positive for Disease X.
Although Disease X has only mild symptoms, you are concerned and ask your doctor about the accuracy of the test. It turns out that the test is 95% accurate. It would appear that the probability that you have Disease X is therefore 0.95. However, the situation is not that simple."

For the exciting conclusion to this story, please see https://stats.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Statis...
Newer versions of factorio have a per-station limit on the number of trains that can be in + routing to that particular stop. very helpful for this kind of problem.
According to the District Court's October 27, 2022 Order, hiQ's litigation was being funded by a third party.

Who was this "litigation funder".^1

Perhap the funder wanted to settle, even though hiQ could have prevailed at trial on the CFAA claims. Arguably, hiQ's goal was not to establish new CFAA precedent, it was to compete with LinkedIn. It wanted a Court to order LinkedIn to stop blocking its access to public data.

This took too long. hiQ ran out of money. (Or its funding source(s) ran out of patience.)

If hiQ had the funding to go the distance, then it's impossible to predict what would have happened.

It's sad that the top comment in this thread believes LinkedIn sued hiQ to stop it from scraping. That's not what happened. hiQ's "business" was going to fail because LinkedIn was effectively blocking its access, even when hiQ was using proxies and mechanical turks. hiQ filed for a declaratory judgment against LinkedIn: hiQ sued LinkedIn.

Here is the Order for anyone who cares to read it.

https://ia600100.us.archive.org/29/items/gov.uscourts.cand.3...

1. According to the Order, the funder is identified in some correspondence filed as an exhibit. It is not clear from the Order whether names in the correspondence were redacted, i.e., it's not clear whether it's public or private information. I'm assuming the former.
> Simpsons did this in a very early episode, where Homer got kicked out after eating too much

I don't remember who did it but I recall a skit that went the other way. Someone went to an all you can eat restaurant and to their dismay discovered it meant all you can eat. The restaurant would not let you leave until you could no longer physically eat any more.
I read your comment and was all ready to write a, I guess, rant about joint probability distributions and costs associated with tests and on and on. You know, a good old rant. But I took a moment to actually read the article. Low and behold, the first line, or perhaps the actual headline,

"Wealthy People Are Getting Full-Body Scans. Early Detection or Unnecessary?"

"Wealthy" appears 3 times. Multiple allusions to income, "summer in the Hamptons" and such.

I'd need to reflect a bit, but I think I'm pretty comfortable with applying FDA requirements and prohibiting any health claims, but feel free to let the snake-oil salesmen fleece away.

As an aside, I wanted to say snake-oil alone, but I learned recently snake-oil itself got a bad rap - https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/how-snake-oil-got-...
CSS Module Scripts are not the same as the third party CSS Modules library that most people are referencing when discussing CSS Modules.
I use Azure. Also going to be looking into Cloud PC or Dev box soon (also azure)
Yeah if they are refusing to share details without money that sounds more like extortion.

> That's not to say somebody might discover a new unique vulnerability in the open source software and packages you might be using, except you wouldn't expect them to report it to your company, as some random user on the Internet, when the official projects are on github.

I've actually had this happen once or twice. AFAICT the situation was either that the reporter explains themselves so poorly (in very broken english) that the original project ignored them, or they are trying to maximize bounties by reporting to everyobe who uses the package instead of the actual maintainer.

> Alternatively if they reported a very specific issue regarding software you developed, I'm sure it would get your 100% attention. That's not been my experience so far (knock on wood).

It does happen (especially if you offer bounties or you are famous), but its like 1% of emails you get at most. Most reports are just incoherent non sense or people misunderstanding the output of an autonated scanner. But its worth it to pay attention for the 1%.
the device needed to feel like something you wanted to hold, regardless of what it was meant to do.

It's the reason I miss the original iPhone. It just felt good in your hand. Exactly the right size, shape, and especially weight.

If I could get its battery replaced (I'm not capable), I would use it as an iPod every day (since 2G service is gone).
Preach. CVEs are ridiculously broken.
Red science (the first milestone) in py is quite a bit harder than launching a rocket (aka endgame) in vanilla/base.
I actually think this makes sense. It's basically outsourced R&D for pharma companies via acquisition of companies once they get at or near approval of a new drug.

This is why I don't take seriously any stats about pharma R&D spending. They don't consider acquisitions to be R&D even though it often effecively is.
What parameters/prompts did you use, I was able to get ok results but not comparable to chat gpt or even bard
Time someone to make a “verifyAI” startup that will generate photo, ID, name, and basically all the data needed, being passive about these blatant privacy violations won’t get us anywhere, time to feed it the wrong data (inspired by that Firefox addon that clicks ads for you), P.S. 20% equity share for the startup idea :)
The 100-Year Plan: Secure Your Online Legacy for a Century
It looks like power plants are also a significant source of nitrogen oxides in the atmosphere, though I don't know what the major/top sources are. From the US EPA [1]:

NO2 primarily gets in the air from the burning of fuel. NO2 forms from emissions from cars, trucks and buses, power plants, and off-road equipment.

As I say, I'm no expert, bu my understanding is that NOx compounds can be formed whenever nitrogen and oxygen are mixed at sufficiently high temperatures, e.g. when burning stuff in air.

[1] https://www.epa.gov/no2-pollution/basic-information-about-no...
More importantly for an airplane, you can't watch Netflix (or most streaming movies) offline on a laptop. Though I've never used a Surface, maybe you can do that with some kind of mobile app that runs on a hybrid thing.
It's still a thing.

You pay a premium, but it's cool to bump into an end table and have your alarm clock shout earthquake warnings in scratchy digitized Japanese at you.

Or casually keep a personal cartoon-themed radiation monitor on your desk.
A big disadvantage of the common law system used in the Anglo sphere. Most countries don't have a system where judicial decisions create precedent.
Could you have prevented future module resolution problems?
If you care about stray cats (and other animals) please take them home or find someone who can take care of them. Don't feed stray animals.

Feeding stray animals will increase their population beyond the capacity of the surrounding environment, and therefore overhunting their preys. You're just killing wild birds unnecessarily.

Plus it will make the stray cats less afraid of humans. Humans are the most dangerous creatures ever. The fact that one human feeds them doesn't make it otherwise. Learning to avoid humans is generally good for them.
Are you sure it's sound and not scent?
Friendly note to the person that changed the title: CALEID was only ever used capitalised.

In the same way as VAIO, etc.
Also; Bidirectional trap is a massive moon trap. Avoid it at all costs.
https://youtu.be/RVe94qa1ar4?si=xGVDzqv4-4W8b4dR

Japanese transit system design influenced by Slime mold finding the optimal connection routes to food, placed strategically mapping Japanese systems. Believe this clip is extracted from a Joe Rogan episode
That's not what they mean. They went through every file in the repository and updated the license to BUSL from MPL.

Unless they have approval from each contributor for a given file (or the contributor signed a CTA or CLA), they cannot re-license that particular file.

It's still MPL and only once all contributors approve or the MPL code is removed can it be re-licensed to an incompatible license.

Of course if they had wanted to move to a compatible license, for a lot of FOSS licenses that is an option. Regardless of whether that is an option for the MPL, they are moving to an incompatible license and could not do this.

----

So their only options for files that they can't convert to the BUSL from the MPL are:

1. Keep contributions to those files under the MPL but require contributors to sign a CTA or CLA guaranteeing those contributions can later be relicensed.

2. Move BUSL contributions out of the file and only keep the MPL contributions in that file until they've all been replaced.

Doing otherwise is violating the MPL.
I've had four cats, two love tuna and two hated it. We ran of cat food and tried to feed them tuna and they wouldn't eat it.
Feral cats, as much as I love a house cat, can almost be thought of as an invasive species.

They absolutely decimate song birds populations.
We used no prompt (only autocomplete) for the HumanEval reproduction: https://huggingface.co/Phind/Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v1.

But you should be able to get it to do stuff just by telling it what you want. Note that it's completion tuned (not chat-tuned), so it should perform better on single-turn conversations.
Wow didn’t even consider this could result in the equivalent of MSG for cats. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
> it's interesting that the top comment in the thread believes LinkedIn sued hiQ to stop it from scraping.

At time of writing, I believe that top comment is mine - and I'll be clear that I wasn't saying that I think that's why LinkedIn sued HiQ.

In fact I don't particularly care why they did it, I'm just interested in what precedents the case has set and whether the typical comments thrown around regarding the case have any actual merit.

There's a comment replying to mine that has a better breakdown of it all that I'd trust over my own anyway. ;P
Parent's point still stands as in a decent ecosystem you'd get down to at most two.

For instance a phone and a Surface Pro covers 100% of the use cases, there's no gap for a 3rd device. For some this gets down to one device with a Galaxy Fold and DEX.

People might have different preferences and/or be locked in the Apple ecosystem anyway, but we have working products showing things done differently ("think different" was such a good copy)
Obtaining the zoom level is an adventure worse than implementing multi-touch-twist-and-shout-zoom from scratch.
> solution to a problem involves the complete global forced extinction of a species

I've never argued for a forced extinction; that's just silly. We're driving numerous species to extinction by favoring only a few animal species and devastating ecosystems to support their breeding and proliferation.

Let's argue that we should maintain an equivalent population of cows and water buffalos. Would that be enough? We could allow these cows to freely roam on grasslands, reserving the remaining grazing lands for other animals whose habitats we have taken from them. Seems fair?

> you're not exactly living in the same shared reality that the rest of us live in

Thank you ... I don't want to. I couldn't look my children in the eyes when they'll learn what we've done with the world.
Yup. From a youth spent watching anime I can read katakana and hiragana, despite Japan’s economic and demographic woes their culture is very impactful
I miss my cat. He loved tuna- but as he got older he just liked to drink the tuna water rather than eat the fish itself. And he absolutely knew the sound of the can opener.
You can follow-up when it's warranted. See the below anecdote. I'm guessing as to the details, but perhaps the thyroid was cancerous early, but it was too indeterminate, so they did nothing. But then when it started growing, they could change the approach. It's a piece of date, to weigh amongst the overall mix. The problem is most people will demand too much action.

"Bob Nelsen says that he has a family history of cancer, so began getting annual Prenuvo scans around 10 years ago.

- The early scans showed a nodule in his thyroid, but doctors didn't believe it was problematic. Then a scan in 2018 showed that the nodule had changed, which isn't supposed to happen in healthy people.

- "When I went into Stanford for surgery, I asked how many patients they'd had with five years of longitudinal data on their thyroid, and they said I was the first," Nelsen tells Axios. "The medical profession is trained to be reactive, not proactive."

- He adds that the scans also discovered a small scar on his brain, which he assumes came from falling off his bike and getting knocked out when he was 11 years-old."
Infectious attention cancer?
I doubt they were involved in the decision, https://twitter.com/mitchellh posts a lot about stepping away from leadership to become an engineer again.
maybe read the sentence again
Has it been 4 years already?
Meta isn't being "heroic" or "winning a long fought battle" or whatever analogy you want to use in order to prop them up and make them look better than they are.

Do I appreciate the free weights from them? Yes. Did they contribute to a genocide in Myanmar? Also yes.

Take the weights and move on. They don't deserve the excessive praise. They aren't a rock band. They are an advertising company.
The cat and the tuna are ancient predator and prey.

Back on the plains before humans, cats used to prey on tuna, cutting out and eating the tastiest and slowest from the school.
Scene Archetypes: The ones making Amiga 500 fun
It's reviewed by someone without any knowledge on the exploitable software. And even if it wouldn't take hours to even set up a testing environment, most CVEs don't include enough information to build an exploit anyway. No need to assume that the reviewers overblow these issues deliberately, there simply isn't anything to meaningfully review in most cases. They can filter out obviously meaningless bullshit, but that's about it.

Source: Found a handfull of RCEs for popular PHP projects, some of which have CVEs.
(Wild speculation) what if it evolved as a mechanism to keep proto-cats near humans? It's clearly quite a successful trait for a species to become associated with humans, maybe cats evolved a taste for fish as they got closer to fishing humans?

Dogs developed new facial muscles and all sorts of other features as they evolved into a companion species. Maybe cats evolved a taste for food they could only get from us?
I have a very hard time believing that your friends and family are getting PET/MRI scans routinely, as opposed to what most people actually do which is "hey I found this lump/I feel bad here, please can you check if this is bad and scan for anything else?"

This is an important distinction, because you can delude yourself and your medical team into believing you are healthy because you had a clean scan x months ago, as part of your annual deep checkup or whatever you want to call it. Leading into that part of if your friends had waited a couple more months it would have been a very different outcome!
Atop an Underwater Hot Spring, an ‘Octopus Garden’ Thrives
Or maybe people decide to expand their own definition of a word, which everyone is allowed to do, and we eventually come to a consensus? Try to be a little less cynical.
Given the fact that OpenAI has constant resources (for any given small span of time) and varying demand (users and query type), it's not crazy to think they dynamically adjust to consume all available resources on their side.

Obviously the base model would be the same, but aren't there are +/- flavors they could overlay with extra compute? E.g. multi-pass, additional experts, etc.

The benefits to giving someone an occasional "magic" answer are too great not to.

Have there been any wide studies on same-prompt-different-times?
Did you miss the point? They are trying to cover up the bad of AI with some little feel good story.