skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> we tend to "overthrow" the preferred Presidential candidate of one of those two factions through a democratic process

Well the Ukrainians did that by gathering a large crowd and dislodging a President they don't like. The USA is not there yet, but the latest events around Trump point that it is an option to contemplate in the future.

> describes Canada to a large extent; there is a large, geographically concentrated faction of Francophones and a similarly large, geographically concentrated faction of Anglophones.

Imagine Canada passing laws that the only language of education and government services should be French. Because that's basically what happened. It all started when the aforementioned large crowd overthrew the Eastern-elected president and then cancelled the law giving the East an option to use their mother's tongue (Russian).

And then Vancouver saying Au Revoir and joining the US. More specifically, Victoria and Vancouver Island with its naval bases joining the US outright, and Vancouver city becoming a "Republic of Vancouver" besieged by Canadian army. Then Canada spends a decade explaining everybody (in French) that it's a US proxy led by some rednecks who moved in from Seattle. Not all of them are even Canadian!

Whereas people in Toronto begrudgingly begin learning French, the ones who want to show loyalty to the state do so by switching to Frenglish.

New textbooks issued by Quebec intellectual circles depict the "many wars" that Canada has fought against the USA and England all the times. Some of those are technically correct. The wars where Canada has fought on the side of England or USA are skipped. 24 of August becoming the main pompious state military holiday.
Sipeed unveils RISC-V tablet, portable Linux console, and cluster
CUDA being feature complete and having libraries & frameworks optimized and immediately deploy-able for it is all the difference. I don't like much of their business/marketing practices for their gaming GPU division, but their engineering and HPC teams are world class and have been awesome to work with / use as an someone who writes scientific computing code on the GPU.
Often creating work is a goal in itself. You gotta justify all those people somehow.
This exact career is that of the protagonist in Evil, my wife and I's favorite show. The show is led by a Catholic priest and an atheist psychiatrist (possibly a -gist in the show) tasked with investigating demon possessions.

Highly recommend it. It is written by a married couple, one Catholic and one atheist. It takes the supernatural seriously without getting hokey or dismissive.
This probably should have been written 20 or 30 years ago. I mean... the reaction to the idea that things are secure because they're open sourced. I'm just disappointed it took 25 years for an organization to respond to ESR with "hey. not all bugs are shallow."

How could we have known that some bugs weren't shallow? Oh... I dunno... maybe looking at history. There were PLENTY of examples of security bugs in code from before the FSF declared a new era of open source utopia. How could we have known ESR and RMS were wrong? (At least in a small, yet important, corner of the memespace.)
It's not Medium, it's Substack.
You're free to find his work interesting. Others are free to find his continual prevaricating shady.
Can’t speak for the American megachurch since I didn’t attend one but I spent a good 10 years in one in Singapore (grew up there) whose membership peaked at >20k at one point.

I would say the main allure of megachurches is the gap between being a consumer and a contributor of that “local church”. Bridging that gap is always challenging for any normal person, and that is true for all sorts of communities. Couple that with an easy-listening “TED-talk”, it is not too difficult to see why one rather just consumes from the pews every Sunday from a larger church.

If you’d use coffee as an simplified analogy for Christianity, the worship service at a megachurch is like a Frappuccino - the easiest drink to get started, appeals to the masses, sweet, lots of other stuff and not too much coffee, which is bitter.
Smaller churches feel a bit more like getting coffee at a hipster cafe, costs a lot more (you have to get involved in church, oh my), doesn’t necessarily suit everyone’s taste, a lot more coffee than additives, and only starts tasting great if you’ve learned a bit more about coffee.

(Well, that’s as far as coffee goes to explain a very complicated and nuanced subject matter, but hey, it was worth it.)
> Existing users will continue to be able to use Fig and will receive ongoing support. What's more, we are now making all the paid Fig Team features completely free.

This sounds like a win for users.
> They even expand the acronyms later in the article.

That's the OPPOSITE of how you're supposed to use acronyms. If you're going to spell it out anyway, why not do it the first time you talk about it like you're supposed to?
Sounds like a talking point one would use if you no longer wanted to provide coverage for preventive care.
People have been compiling Ollama to run on Linux. The reason why it's not packaged yet for Linux is due to packaging it with GPU support - at the very least with nvidia support.

Almost there!
First I take responsibility for most of the failings listed here. Second self-help is a broad subject and I only pursue scrubbing some memories, getting a few frustrating tasks done and increasing some focus/concentration.

I've tried reading Amazon sample portions, borrowing library books, buying cheap used copies, reading summaries, trying to read the book from the beginning and skimming through the book hoping to find the relevant paragraph or page. All seem to be roughly equally unsatisfying and unproductive for me.

Some books, from the title and description, seem like they would be applied self-help, but on reading turn out to be more abstract popularized general descriptions than intense applied instruction. Other books are more applied, but then turn out to describe a daily process that they say must be practiced for months to accomplish what they claim and it isn't even clear to me exactly what specific concrete benefit I would get if I invested that time. I don't have, and I suspect many or most people don't have, the motivation to practice something for months with no immediate demonstration that there will be actual benefit that I want after that investment. Example: think "mindfulness." What specific concrete benefit that you need and want NOW are you certain to get out of that after how much time you invest in that?

There are lots of little surprising example effects in psychology that can be clearly demonstrated in a minute. I'm not talking about turning your life upside down, I'm talking about spending a minute or two followed by "WOW! I actually SAW that happen!" If there were self-help books, particularly on the areas that I am interested in, that would begin with such a relevant exercise and follow that with a bit more explanation, followed by a slightly larger and slightly more impressive exercise, followed by ... repeat until end of book ... then I think that would give me the motivation, and I suspect give others the motivation, to buy the book and read every sentence and do every exercise and see every effect and maybe even by the end of the book be motivated to spend months doing the prescription and get the complete benefit promised by the book and see if the author has done this in any other books and buy all those books and tell everyone I know about these books and urge them to buy the books...

If anyone is aware of anything like that for the areas that I'm interested in then please find a way to let me know about that. Thanks
Oh no! But what if we run the test a third time?
Every language, every rule, every suggestion has exceptions and gotchas. That's just life, and programming in general.

I can't think of anything significant off-hand, it was just more to stave off this part from the post:

>If you take a parameter by non-const reference, the caller can only use lvalues to call your function. But if you take a parameter by const reference, the caller can use lvalues or rvalues. So some functions, in order to be used in natural ways, must take their parameters by const reference.

>I say let's make companies financially liable for the consequences of their preferences and see how this shakes out.

This is completely unrelated. It's also a bit of a dangerous road to go down and I'd suggest thinking about it a lot more.
The other comment basically got it. Ask doctor particularly with family history. All cancers are better treated if caught earlier but some like colorectal cancer have much less severe outcomes if caught early on (eg removing a large segment of colon vs a small polyp)
ive been using raycast on a new computer, i prefer alfred, much faster, and i know the tooling better.
With the bed sideways it will only work for shorter people. A Transit is 178cm/5’10” wide internally and this package has extra walls.
A few of my colleagues and I had the silly (?) idea that you don't really need logs anymore. Instead of log messages you just attach span events [0]. You then just log the span title and a link to that span in Jaeger; something like [1]. I've only really tried that in my private project, but it felt pretty good. The UI of Jaeger could be a bit better to support that usage, though.

Edit: Actually, those colleagues are doing a talk about that topic. So, if you are in Germany and Hannover area, have a look at [2] and search for "Nie wieder Log-Files!".

[0]: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/instrumentation/ruby/manual/#a...

[1]:

tracing.ts:38 Usecase: Handle Auth
tracing.ts:47 http://localhost:16686/trace/ec7ffb1e23ddbb8dd770a3f08028666b
tracing.ts:38 Adapter: Find Personal Board
tracing.ts:47 http://localhost:16686/trace/e22d342316ab0d7d23230864008e27bc
tracing.ts:38 Adapter: Find Starred Board List
tracing.ts:47 http://localhost:16686/trace/129f89cee26d54cfdc38abea368d9b4e
tracing.ts:38 Adapter: Find Personal Board List
tracing.ts:47 http://localhost:16686/trace/97948127d77501ff0c65a5db21b21b5a

[2]: https://javaforumnord.de/2023/programm/
Not all positive tests are cancer. In some cases, actual cancers could be a tiny minority of positive tests. The tests themselves are a dangerous tool, and the way we minimize that danger is through statistics.
That doesn't mean NDAs are unenforceable. It just means you're getting them to fix the problem without signing their NDA, and presumably going through more hassle in the process.
Instead of giving criminals UBI how about the police actually enforce shoplifting crime?
it is typical for experimental/beta/alpha projects that features don't work or/and later found not to be feasible and later dropped from road map, there is nothing "outrageous" here.

From another hand, you clearly tried to manipulate narrative by changing context and specificity.
Maybe, but that's why things like ollama.ai are trying to fill the gap. It's simple, and you don't need all of the heavy weight enterprise crap if nothing ever leaves your system.
> If you install a screen reader, I encourage you to use a Linux laptop.

For what it's worth, the ChromeOS built-in screen reader seemed surprisingly powerful (to me experimenting as a non-blind person curious about the space; no idea if it's actually useful to a blind person). The UI is also pretty simple, so it could be great for basic web browsing needs.
When your classmates threaten you with felony charges
I also thought the wrong thing at first since the big front and center title on the homepage says "The next-generation command line."
It can still be considered like an exchange when there is written: "If you use this software, then you agree to comply to the license". Im not sure though to be honest. I might depend on the law system or the mood of the judge.
Maybe the Go client doesn't support that? https://opentelemetry.io/docs/instrumentation/go/sampling/
I don't think you're supposed to.

What's supposed to happen is you learn on the job but that rarely happens because unless you graduated from a top 10 school you're typically hired to do drudgery that exists due to poor tech management.

So if you are actually a normal person in tech with things going on in your life you will inevitably fall behind.
"liberal arts" in that context does not imply "liberal" in the present-day political sense.
I have time, what I don't have is energy. I just can't do anything useful after work.
Serious question - SF clearly isn't the place for you, so why don't you move back to Houston?
Right. Likewise, there are many unusual materials we could make our houses out of, but for economic efficiency we mostly make them out of some combination of wood, stone, clay, steel, and chemical binders thereof.
But giving hormones to children (who may not recognise the future repercussions of their childhood decisions) to prevent puberty etc is not psychological or physical abuse? How is that not active, literal abuse?

The suggestion I'm making is therapeutic - it is supportive of the biology of the person who is suffering with a unbalanced hormones. At the end of the treatment I propose, it remains a possibility that the person can live a normal life, being able to reproduce etc - as opposed to becoming sterilised.
If rust can do it so well, I see no remaining argument about performance and control. It was long believed that C++ had to be bad in this way because such languages must be. Rust was the counter example that ended this myth
Sorry, that’s not how this works. Burden of proof is not new, nor is it complicated. Thus:

> what may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

It’s trivial to find sweeping and unsubstantiated opinions. It’s trivial to find arguments on both[1] sides[2]. Why should I trust either? Either way, what evidence trivially and unquestionably supports “immense harm”?

This argument has been going in circles for 2+ years, it’s not like I haven’t seen more rigorously defended and less hyperbolic opinions before. That stuff, I’ll consider. What you and OP are doing is just noise.

[1] https://www.heritage.org/public-health/commentary/the-failin...

[2] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/vaccine-mandates-...
Target market for the MachE is explorer and escape owners looking at EVs. Lightning and MachE aren’t anywhere close to the same price point.

# of MachEs at local dealer = 3

# of F150s sitting on lot >1 month = 50-100
Quite anticlimactic - though I guess that's what you get when neither side can prove anything. Regardless, if there is nothing to be seen, I'm happy that it's over. Too bad it has happened, though.
One has to wonder if these “review” mechanisms are not really engineered like a Skinner box, where the developer is the pigeon.

I honestly cannot decide which is worse: app development, or the web ecosystem as a whole. But at least on “the web” you can push fixes at a resonable speed.
It's great looking at the repo to see the simplicity, just some HTML and CSS, don't need to compile some stupid CSS templating language, a bunch of variables and a dependency on npm for some unknown reason.

It reminds me of my early days of playing with web.

That said, visually, it gives a sort of spam site vibe in 2023, uninspiring, uses gradient buttons, immediately gives me the impression that whatever research it holds is as boring as the colour scheme.

I mean that constructively and not as a criticism.

Perhaps a static site generator with a suitable theme would be more appropriate for a site where presumably the information it holds should be front and centre?
Absolutely!

Something I keep relearning is that people are different, sometimes in ways hard for me to comprehend :)
Are you implying every system is stable and reliable now, because it is in the cloud? My guess is that it helps on the hardware front, but there is more to a stable system.
I am also free to think that you are stalking him with toxic attacks on the minor issues which were resolved long ago.
California is way more tolerant of wrong think than elsewhere in the country - local school board elections in SC for example were horrifically toxic and administrators lost their jobs for discussing mask mandates, critical race theory, the existence of LGBT issues, etc. Leaving SC for CA - it's so nice to be somewhere that isn't so caught up in the culture war of the moment. Big cities are also nice - if you move to a small town, you better conform culturally.

It's expensive but the economy is so dominant in so many areas it would take a long time to peel away the reasons people move there. There are a lot of pretty awful things about CA, but it has its draw for a reason.

Also the weather is insanely nice and the produce is so fresh and the food is good and the cities have all the city things you could want. Unparalleled maker scene, bars and restaurants, art and entertainment. There are things like housing and crime that drive people away, but I'm not sure any other cities do the other stuff so much better that you'd leave for the new city instead of to get away from SF. I'm super partial to NY but even I get that it's not wildly better in some fundamental way.
Depending on how greenfield a project is, you don't even need span events unless you absolutely require a timestamp for a specific operation with no duration. Just using spans for every meaningful operation is like having more powerful structured logs.

This approach isn't possible for a lot of systems that have existing logs they need to bring along, but if you're greenfield enough, I'd recommend it.
I don’t think such an optimization exists.

The nice think about Fortran it that is does the sensible thing by default for the type of scientific computing codes that are inside it’s wheelhouse (the trivial example, it assumes arguments don’t alias by default).

C can beat anything, assuming unlimited effort. Fortran is nice for scientists who want to write pretty good code. Or grad students who are working on dissertations in something other than hand-tuning kernels.
Those cases are the ones for which the explicit return type was intended. And if the deduced type is counterintuitive you could also use the explicit return type (or a comment: there are good arguments for either choice).

But if your argument is "this makes the reader do extra work" then that's an argument against all uses of `auto`. Now I do consider reader clarity a legitimate (and important) design criterion (and argument in code review), but I don't think it is reasonable in this case.

In fact I consider type deduction with auto to be an important element of readability: it tells the reader not to worry about the type and focus on the logic. Then the cases when a type is explicitly specified it tells the reader that it's worth paying attention.
Apple Musics approach is my favorite.

They show a white screen for half a second, which is usually enough to load the content.
If the request takes too long, a spinner fades in.

They also, very conservatively, show partial- or skeleton screens. Crucially, these skeleton never animate, cause layout shifts or show filler content. They usually just show UI elements that would be there regardless of what the loaded content is.

I never even noticed the loading states until I started paying attention to them.
const never really worked with other C++ features[0], so in any big pile of code you're better off not using const.

[0] The compiler will gladly pass a non-const pointer to a non-const object to a function that expects a const pointer to a const object; it all "makes sense". However, a compiler will explode when you're trying to pass a non-const vector of non-const objects to a function that expects a const vector of const objects.
Mentalism as an explanation of how someone could demonstrate "hidden knowledge" is well-known enough that they appear at least a little foolish ending their paragraph with, "These are skills that cannot be explained except by special psychic or preternatural ability."

They could at least be kind enough to go on to explain why they discount cold reading as a possibility. I'd personally be interested to see a trained mentalist interview these people because it would be much more telling if they arrived at the same conclusions. But I'm also thinking there's a likely reason that such possessed people avoid allowing themselves to be filmed.
Just to expand on your last point, I read their ad copy and once you strip out all of the meaningless filler text you have this key quote: “with the permission of the developer”. If they weren’t going to do it before, this can’t force them and if they were, they don’t need it.

As a game buyer, that sounds like doubling the number of companies who need to be paid and whose business decisions or failure will break things, add additional fees, etc. “Our incredible journey” is another way to say “you’re going to get server errors if you try to use your purchases”.

As a game developer, that sounds like I still have to do almost all of the work but now I’m locking in payments and giving up some control of my business to another party whose interests only partially correlate with mine or my partner developers’.

In both cases, there doesn’t seem to be enough value to support a sustainable business. Any two game developers are going to need to collaborate to share anything between games, and there’s a really upper bound on how much money they’ll pay before cutting out the middleman starts to look really compelling. Similarly, many gamers don’t like pay to win and won’t pay anything for cosmetic items so you’re chasing the percentage of people who both do and are willing to pay more upfront and more later despite not even knowing what future games would offer that option or how much they’ll charge.
I think the real feature is this:

" We do not train on your business data or conversations, and our models don’t learn from your usage. ChatGPT Enterprise is also SOC 2 compliant and all conversations are encrypted in transit and at rest. "
So, I have a question (I didn't real the LANL paper, save for the highlights above, but I did read your initial post that you linked to).

And this isn't meant as some kind of bait, just honest intellectual curiosity (its the internet so you can't see how it presented, just read the raw words).

Simply, why is it important for Fortran to survive in this space? Why not let the field move on? Why fight this fight?
Seems like direnv and shell scripts in a shared git repo could be similar:

https://direnv.net/
Part of the issue is that articles like this one tend to conflate individual poor people shoplifting small items with these organized gangs. These gangs aren't shoplifters, and calling them such is extremely misleading.
If they are completely forgotten, they are probably more often than not, never found again.
Reader mode may overcome this, it did for me on Mobile Safari
"I am thrilled to announce that the Fig team will be joining Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Amazon has acquired Fig's technology! "

That's possibly the most inefficient way of saying "AWS bought Fig" but I guess it makes some people happier to frame it that way

In any event, I'll pass on "the CLI with a subscription that sends telemetry".

Paying hard earned dollars every month for a terminal is something so out of the realm of the possible for me I'm honestly baffled to see this has any customers...
You can follow [0] which is currently stage 2 to fix this

[0]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-context
There is no point comparing costs on an absolute basis. Yes California is more expensive than a lot of other states, but those states in turn are more expensive than Mexico and South/Central America, which are more expensive than parts of Asia and Africa, and so on. The point isn't to simply chase the cheapest prices, but to compare them with the purchasing power in the immediate area. Homes and utilities in California have to be affordable for Californians, not the rest of the world.