skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, I was talking about general rollback for Android. In this specific case, they chose to rush and they didn't test (boo-hoo). It's like me complaining that the tools shouldn't have let my bug go to PRD even though I didn't test (and apparently didn't know much about Android as evidenced by not having a physical Android device).

Same thing if your site cert expires, or browsers start blocking specific functionality/code/tags. Seems like they just want to complain about the thing they aren't familiar with.
We (The Eye Tribe folks) sold one at 99$ years ago. 1k-3k is mostly lack of competition I believe.
From your article:

'Lu then bluntly raises the issue of a no-confidence vote: “I think if the no-confidence vote against the Prime Minister succeeds, all will be forgiven in Washington because the Russia visit is being looked at as a decision by the Prime Minister,” Lu said, according to the document. “Otherwise,” he continued, “I think it will be tough going ahead.”

Lu warned that if the situation wasn’t resolved, Pakistan would be marginalized by its Western allies. “I cannot tell how this will be seen by Europe but I suspect their reaction will be similar,” Lu said, adding that Khan could face “isolation” by Europe and the U.S. should he remain in office.

Asked about quotes from Lu in the Pakistani cable, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said, “Nothing in these purported comments shows the United States taking a position on who the leader of Pakistan should be.” Miller said he would not comment on private diplomatic discussions.'

Yes, I think it's wholly justified for the American people and their politicians to go "Wow, you guys want to support Russia in this blatantly murderous invasion? Well our people don't look too kindly on that and our relations are going to deteriorate. We do understand this is because of Khan, so if Khan isn't leading the country, it's more acceptable."

It's not regime-change for me to tell another country that their leadership concerns me, I do not support that leadership, and that I would like to trade and make less deals with you. We treat terrible governments like Putin's Russia or The Third Reich the same.
There is always a new way to block ads on YT or any platform. But then a few months later it gets changed rendering these methods useless.

Instead, why don’t we attack the advertisers? YT/Google only appear to track “clicks”, but does it actually track purchases as well?

In theory, if there are enough fake (bots) and real users clicking through ads but not buying anything. Then that should burn through the advertising budgets. Over time the marketing departments should see that clicks are at an all time high on X platform but conversions are a small percentage of those “clicks” or impressions. Thus pulling out from the platform all together.
The term to search for is "heaven's gate". TL;DR: Intel processors can, in usermode, switch between 32-bit and 64-bit mode.

Note that the concept of a process is irrelevant: processes don't exist to Intel processors. There was a concept called a "task" early on in I believe the 286 line, but nowadays all OSes just set up a single task segment on the CPU and do all of the context switching via other means, because it simply wound up being faster anyway. The processor just has tons of registers that you can flip around, and being able to switch between protected mode and long mode is a property of the code segment currently being executed (IIRC) which is something you can jump between in usermode using a far call. (And this is, as far as I know, just about the only way in which x86 segments remain relevant today.)
Hamlet?
Can $1B fix a meat industry dominated by just four companies?
I don't believe the majority of VCM offsets are being purchased by end users. Are they? I thought they're typically purchased by corporate entities to support "net zero carbon by X year" pledges.

Apparently this stuff has matured a lot in the last 10 years, and I haven't been keeping pace with it.

There's already a concept of "vintage" (i.e. year carbon reduction realized in), but I still don't think they're being traded in a floating price futures model.

It sounds like the international community is leaning on certification-first, then sale of only certified offsets.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_offsets_and_credits#O...

... which, doesn't feel like it fully harnesses the power of market investment in new technologies.

If a corporate buyer finds a new technology that has promise, they should be able to plow money into it! (At a cheaper per-offset-CO2-ton price than alternatives)

If that new tech delivers, the company just saved money. (For the same amount of CO2 offset purchase)

If the new tech fails to deliver, the offset buying company should be forced to realize financial losses.

Ergo, companies will be incentivized to invest in the most effective tools for future CO2 offsetting.
That's not what I said, I live half my life within browsers. But big chunk of the population that you are probably not thinking about is not like that. My mother in law is using browser to read on her computer, and will never do that on her phone - the screen is too small and the whole experience not something that fits someone at her age. On the other hand, my children use apps since they are two years old, and at the age of seven they still rarely if ever used browser.
It's not an overconfidence that gets me, it's a pessimistic extrapolation. I assume it's going to continue to be crux-level hard even past the crux and when it's not I still end up taxed as if it was.
I think I'm just summing up what you said.
That's a very biased view. He could have multiple rounds of layoffs like Amazon or Meta without affecting the operations too much. I'm not sure who the remaining 10% are who are still willing to stick with it. Software is not like the hardware spaces. If the good engineers do not like what they are receiving they would just leave for other places.

He also killed the the ads revenue. Have you forgotten about that?
This is a leadership failure.

Without proper leadership, it only takes a few bad apples to spoil the bunch.
If you don't mind, could you give some examples of what conditions interfere with what parts of that process, whilst preserving the capacity to otherwise engage productively on HN?
Having used Python a lot, I was never glad for multiple inheritance. I’d prefer traits.
Labor unions are pushing hard for better pay and hours – and winning
About as useful a rebrand as "the"
Play Grosse Fuge loud and make everyone hate you. Well, not everyone - except for me and a portion of one percent[0] of the population.

[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/23/business/media/stream-cla...
There's a great book that really demonstrates the culture the NSF/Mil contractors have set up there https://www.amazon.com/Big-Dead-Place-Menacing-Antarctica/dp... by an unfortunately now dead author.
I'm pretty sure they don't check certs. If they did, there would be many corporate networks and even entire countries where they wouldn't work, because they use DPI on all inbound/outbound connections with SSL stripping.
Celery Async Tasks on Fly Machines · Django Beats
I don’t think Scrum was the basis of the problem.
Yes you will. Because you can't afford to write code like a modern optimizing compiler. You're going to have the same kind of linecount that you have in your high level language projects and those lines will compile down to a few bytes each at most.

Assembly language binaries tend to be extremely small compared to equivalent code written using a high level language. But: you'll easily spend 10x the time on them. The 'modern optimizing compiler' argument is at the function level: where you write a function using assembly and then write a similar function using a high level language (but still a compiled one, obviously). Yes, the compiler will probably win that race. But an assembly language programmer isn't going to write their code like that at all.

They will reduce the task to the point where it is manageable and that alone will save far more code than the compiler can ever remove. Assembly is (and assembly language based applications are) utterly bloat free, you do what you have to do and nothing more. You can use registers in ways that a compiler would never even think of because you can globally optimize.

No stack frames if you don't need them. No memory accesses if you don't need them.

But code that is hard to maintain and that likely will not be easy to work on with multiple people. 100 KLOC (including comments) -> 16Kb output. No high level language would even begin to approach that.
Disallowing fill or kill(or deprioritising) could solve this. So any sell order is split between buy orders matching.
Recruiters will go where the people looking for jobs are. There might be a certain value for people still using X for whatever reason. I'm not sure what that demographic is because It's definitly not me.
Lunch is paid?
The characteristics of the systems we use control the usage that we make of them. Not having fast internet means you don't do the kinds of things people do with fast internet.

It's more likely that people play console games they can buy on disk at walmart. Another alternative would be to use a pirated version that is highly compressed with extra crap removed. For instance fitgirls has a version of forza that is only 67GB. There are times when it might actually make sense even to buy a game to support the dev AND still pirate it.

So what can we do about the situation. Obviously we can continue to expand faster internet but as developers maybe we should offer our own compressed version if we can't bring ourselves to economize in general. For instance some games that top 100GB have 10s of GB of uncompressed audio that could profitably be reduced. We can ensure that locale specific content like languages can be disabled. We could break levels into content packs that can be downloaded AS the game is used. Maybe that 120GB can be reduced to 60GB of which 20GB needs to be downloaded immediately to start playing? How many users play some of a game and move on? My bet would be a LOT.
> However, one situation where I do love it is "before I leave the house to go to X" checklists

Not diagnosed with anything, but I put things in my shoes, such as the occasional paper envelope that needs sending.

The computer chair is another "an item is physically obstructing me I must deal with it before I continue" destination. (Example: Some dirty laundry, indicating I need to start the washing-machine I loaded earlier.)
But doesn't this break type checking for the users of the proxy functions?
This ignores the contributions of alcohol.
Was coming to mention it. It fascinated me, can't recommend enough. And indeed, it's the definition or underated.
O this will sooo become yet another addictive time-eater for those sensitive to it.

Next to smoking, drinking, gambling, social media, silly online games, chatting with (and probably soon: talking with) virtual, AI powered buddies will be the Next Big Thing (tm) obsessing ppl to unhealthy levels.

Or just for kicks / bragging rights / to one-up the next dude.

I'm off to get another bag of popcorn.
Or you can find work with sane people who don't think anyone on Twitter is a right wing bigot.
No. There’s no “AI detection”, just a way to look at the history of revisions and let teachers decide for themselves
No alcohol.
Thanks! Their removal process is awful and requires 'email verification' even though half their info on you is often incorrect. Who have them the right to 'verify' us... anyway...

To get past this, create a burner email (gmail or duckduckgo or mozilla or hey or icloud) that looks at least a little bit human, send a very angry sounding email to privacy@intelius.com and cc privacy@peopleconnect.us (the company that owns intelius, zabasearch, uspeoplesearch... and a few other spam sites).

Tell them you tried to use their form and it's broken and not showing correct info. You may need to verify your bday or past addresses in an email exchange, but once you do this with 2 or 3 emails, they'll suppress your info from public search. DO NOT send them government ID, even if they ask for it, insist you've already provided enough verification.

Include if you're a Californian / Colorado / EU / Iowa / Utah / Connecticut resident, or if you've had any harassment / stalking issues in the past. (this context provides you with legal leverage if they don't comply with your request - so including it helps you get a faster response)

If they give you anymore trouble beyond that, reach out to our team hello [at] kanary.com. We'll help you escalate the issue.
Democracy _may_ follow economic development. Economic development (as in move past developing country phase) has essentially never followed early democratic development. Poor autocrats has a chance of becoming rich autocratic or rich democratic societies. Poor democratic societies largely stays poor, with historic consistency bordering on certainty. Best thing developing countries can wish for is competent autocrat and favourable geopolitical conditions.
As Nauseum was banned in the Chrome store, so it seems to be fairly effective
I worked in a search engine :D

In short, we needed to approximate the count.

We had some kind of hard limit for matching documents during a regular keyword search (80k maybe? It's been years since I worked there). The ranking was done after this, as well as the aggregation of data for the facets. So if your query of "cute bunnies" (faceted on file type) filled up all 80k results by the time the query processor made it through 25% of the data, and those 80k results contained 5k gifs, then we'd display '20k' next to the 'gifs' check box.
I believe it’s this 1970 gig? https://youtu.be/hWUiLJnEYJI
I find that a good systematic focusing technique is to 'look' at the patterns inside your closed eyes when lying on your back. When I do this I see very little at first, maybe some fuzzy indistict patterns ... but then the patterns become progressively more detailed until I am in an interesting dreamlike state with fascinating visual effects and characters. Sometimes I find i can influence these dreams - I guess this is akin to lucid dreaming. A most entertaining way to fall asleep!
I'd want that for my kids, because I think it'd be net-best for them.

Clearly, I'm not talking about extreme abuse.

But I am talking about more discomfort than I (as the parent) would want for the child in my ideal world.

Parenting is always wanting your child to suffer as little as possible. But a little suffering is good in the long run for the child.

Thus, the fundamental tension in letting parents be the ultimate arbiters of a child's experience.
This misses embodied carbon in imports and much of the emissions from domestic agricultural and industrial processes, which are surely large enough to not be ignorable.

If you want to only tax fuels, that's a start.
Main differences in emulation context:

- The Cartesi Machine can run any Linux distribution with RISC-V support, it emulates RISC-V ISA, while CheerpX emulates x86. For instance the Cartesi Machine can run Alpine, Ubuntu, Debian, etc.

- The Cartesi Machine performs a full Linux emulation, while CheerpX emulates only Linux syscalls.

- The Cartesi Machine has no JIT, it only interprets RISC-V instructions, so it is expected to be slower than CheerpX.

- The Cartesi Machine is isolated from the external world and this is intentional, so there is no networking support.

- The Cartesi Machine is a deterministic machine, with the possibility to take a snapshot of the whole machine state so it can be resumed later, CheerpX was not designed for this use case.
On the section regarding loading items in a list, the article notes to be careful with infinite loading or a "load more" button for performance reasons, which is totally correct but would it not be standard practice to have some kind of recycler/virtualizer mechanism in place if the UI is likely to be handling such large quantities of items?
good feedback ty - we'd like to test a lower cost tier. This is very helpful and common feedback from folks who don't need as intense support as our earliest adopters.
There is a reason it is the standard editor, after all.
I have our PiHole set up with just ad lists, not trackers or privacy. I follow that up on my own devices with uBO with more thorough lists, but this way my whole family gets ad protection rather than nothing.
First, the United States contributes more than its "fair share" of carbon emissions. We have more cars per capita than anyone else, and cars are a major factor contributing to greenhouse gasses (arguably the single biggest factor).

Second the lifestyle of individual Americans is, on average, much more energy intensive than other individuals in the world. There's our cars, like I already mentioned, but also the meat-heavy diet we have uses more resources (think of how much land is needed to sustain a cow vs how much grains, beans, or veggies the same land plot of land could produce), and the relatively large and single family homes many of us have take more energy to heat and cool. The very wealthiest Americans go much further and are huge contributers to climate change (privates jets, multiple large houses, yachts, private golf land, etc).

Third, your point that western nations shift pollution to other countries is correct. If a state or nation enacts strict rules about industrial pollution, and a company decides to move their factories to another country with less regulation to save money, then there has been no reduction in emissions! But a country gets to claim they are clean, while their corporations continue to make profits and their consumers continue enjoy their gadgets that depend on dirty production. I think if we actually prioritized climate change over company profits, laws would be stricter about where a company could construct foreign factories.

One other point I'd like to make is that shifting production around like this means that there is more shipping required in order to get raw materials to factories and finished goods to consumers. That also is energy intensive, which mostly means burning fossil fuels.
Are there companies that die because they produced something people loved and wanted to buy but just couldn't deliver because off the shelf components were just too subpar? I haven't seen that case. I have seen companies die trying to perfect software no one is buying though, quite often.
This was why I loved it so much. With m1 MacBook pros, I don't know how I feel about using osx anymore. Yeah arm is ok but I miss bootcamp.
I'll add that eBay's search is really good if you know how to use it. By use it I mean encapsulating every important phrase that you want to include or exclude within parenthesis and using commas as "or" statements within the parenthesis, such that "(phrase 1) -(phrase 2, phrase 3)" will return results for phrase 1 and exclude any listings that contain phrase 2 or phrase 3. It also pays attention to spacing so that only exact matches are returned.
Deep-Sea Tourism or Deep-Sea Science?
If you can't or won't do native, go Flutter. The alternatives will keep you busy.
There's also simultaneous appreciation and aversion.

There's some experimental and challenging modern classical compositions that I can appreciate aesthetically but which are, at the same time, almost painfully unlistenable. Steve Reich's Four Organs is a good example [1]. It's music, I hear the structure of the music, my mood shifts with the music, yet after a few minutes... aaaaaaaaaaghh! turn it off!!!

In the dramatic arts, there's the whole genre of horror.

I'm fairly sure this extends to foods. Some people like to eat foods that are right on that threshold between triggering intolerable revulsion and excitement.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0yTZmMgI5I
I think you're right. Or if you have functions you'd want to use this more often than never, I'd strongly prefer to make them kwarg-only (ie `def foo(*, arg1, arg2, ...)`). Then you don't have to care about ordering at all.
Do you trust certificate authorities? Do you trust the Chinese govt? Russian?

While I agree in principal, in practice https is not very resilient to the attacks you mentioned because CAs are demonstrably [1,2,3] not trustworthy despite being baked into your browser.

1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiNotar

2: https://therecord.media/mongolian-certificate-authority-hack...

3: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/11/state...
For most of these type hints or static typing do not at all help. I haven’t went through all of them, but in the first quarter or so almost all of them were due to leaky compiler weirdness in CPython.
+1 I worked in sec analytics and it was just a bunch of ppl sending me excels with cves and devices. Not to mention the team on the other side of the company that deems something critical so now we have multiple tools scanning, feeding garbage data and a bunch of operations folks patching…only to rinse and repeat.
But you won't be writing the same code as the code that you would write in a high level language, and that is sort of the point. You're going to do your utmost not to write such code because then you might as well break out the C compiler.
The Russians were complaining that it is in most cases invisible to Radar and needs to be shot down by gunfire. It can also carry an explosive payload of 4-5 Kg. Apparently 3 out of 16 were shot down with machine gun fire using tracers but 13 got through to destroy several SU-30 and MIG aircraft along with several air defense and radar complexes at a Russian airbase in the Kursk Region.
Wait until the first time it has a >10gb update.

I preinstalled it on my Xbox just before release, and it had a >20gb day one patch, as I recall.
Purely my own opinion, but it shouldn't take a leader going "Hey, SA is bad, so don't do it, OK?" for someone to have the morals to 1) not SA someone and 2) report SA if they learn about it.

Then again, I'm often accused of having too strong of a sense of justice.
I don't think it's confusing or even on the level of "semantics": looping over dict keys/elements is a common pattern and the 3.7 change makes that a little more predictable and consistent.

Two dicts with same elements not being equal would be surprising and confusing.
The whole stunt-hot-sauce phenomenon is exactly that.
Choreographic Programming: Higher-Order Typed Functional Choreographies
A 64-core mixed-signal in-memory compute chip based on phase-change memory
Ich bin der Musikant mit Taschenrechner in der Hand
> There's also a lot of low hanging fruits in developped countries, better farming techniques, electric cars, heat insulation, financing renewables depending of the electric mix, making food products with less emissions cheaper for consumers to shift consumption...

That's moderately hanging fruit, and all of it is being done in most EU countries and to a significant degree in the US.
I always preferred marquee
The problem with carbon offsets is worse than that.

First, there is no real way to tell if someone was going to do something anyway. You have an existing operation which is already cost effective to modernize because the fuel savings exceed the cost, so you were going to do it anyway, but now you get to sell credits even though the modernization would have happened regardless. So you have a significant amount of preexisting supply without motivating any real emissions reduction.

Second, not everyone is required to buy them, so the demand side is artificially low.

The result is that credits are available for less than $2/ton, or to put it another way, less than $0.02 per gallon of gasoline. This is obviously not going to provide any meaningful incentive to reduce emissions.
I would argue carbon offsets are exactly doing their job: allowing people and corporations to throw a bit of money at the problem and continue with business as usual.

They are the equivalent of medieval indulgences.
"I'm sorry, you are correct in pointing out that I returned couches containing toxic fire retardants. Here is the correct list:"

[... same list ...]