skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Do we know if the unrar command line tool[0] is similarly affected? I can't seem to find anything that says one way or the other.

[0] https://packages.debian.org/stable/unrar
They could reduce the risk by mooring the tanker to one of the Tasman Bridge supports.
> or off-the-cuff rants related only to the title (because no one here RTFA)

> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.

I hope this irony was intentional, as it's top notch.
Ideally, do just what you said and have another person to do those things. My wife has ADHD and I take care of all financial stuff and most of the cleaning (we also have a maid but she only comes weekly). We each cook for ourselves, but she largely does pre-made meals and takeout, whereas I actually cook all of my food from scratch.

That maybe sounds asymmetric and unfair, but though I'm healthy now, I've been in situations in the past where I couldn't even dress myself and she took care of me. It's a lifetime partnership. Workload doesn't need to be perfectly symmetric at all times. Besides, when I lived alone before getting married, I also paid all the bills and did all the cooking and cleaning myself, so it's not like this added work.
It seems the enshittification cycle may have resulted at least in part from the Blitzscaling methodology [1]. Are there any studies on the effectiveness of Blitzscaling in general? I wonder if it's a net success or not.

[1]:https://www.blitzscaling.com/
This is just dishonest. They're not denying the ship because of any of the physical requirements - they're denying it because the crew hasn't completed the necessary training to safely transit the harbor.

> TasPorts had previously indicated Nuyina may be able to pass under the bridge, but only after successful completing of training courses and simulation exercises at the Australian Maritime College.

> The Australian Antarctic Division (AAD) has confirmed that approval has not been granted and the ship must instead travel to Burnie this summer, on the island state’s north-west coast, to receive fuel. This must occur before every voyage to Antarctica.

It had conditional approval to transit the bridge last year but then ended up being sent to Singapore for maintenance work before they had finished. They were performing more trials earlier this year but apparently still haven't completed everything and are needed in Antarctica so are shifting their plans.
What I think is where it probably starts working well is when you can fuse information from other cars and sensors on the road. And or bicycles and even pedestrians.

Imagine a stop light with a lidar sensor that broadcasts that information. Car ahead broadcasting that it's stopped in the fast lane.
There was a huge burst recently and then a crash. It’s a regression to the mean.
Yeah I got that, but I disagree having to hold down down additional keys to enable that mode, and importantly in my case, having to remember to hold them down is less effort then moving your wrist two or three inches.

Ultimately there’s going to be a lot of personal habit baked into these preferences and we are talking about micro-optimisations at best anyway. Which I why I think it’s probably better to just agree to disagree.
I wonder if behaviour like that doesn’t make you rise up a list of interesting IMEIs that ping at addresses X, Y, and Z, and seem to commute along road A for one year at a time.
>In more than one way, the users of Threads lose from my non-participation.

Wow, this guy…
Why did you pick those two? Usage-wise mastodon looks 100x larger than pleroma, and I can't get stats on soapbox.

I'll defend that user count isn't all that matters (these aren't venture capital backed businesses), but I'm curious why you prefer those?

[1] https://fediverse.observer/stats

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fediverse
The first three I read like "__ dimensions that are zero", the last one useless/borderline gibberish - it sounds like "isn't that just an int, not an array of ints?"

So yeah, my description above is a bit off, I guess it's the articles that do it? Is "some" considered an article?
It's been tried a few times, but largely abandoned due to cost overruns.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NS_Savannah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_marine_propulsion#Civi...
I understand what you're saying now. That's an indirect and tentative benefit, which needs to be stacked up against the immediate and obvious detriment of threads being littered with rote, obvious disagreements. Most especially important to be aware of: even good comments are routinely downvoted! But those downvotes are almost always rapidly swamped by upvotes. In the system you're implying, we'd be reading rote meta commentary for all those fluctuations.

I think the system we have now works well for the thing it's designed to improve.
So there are 5 observed bosons, and one postulated graviton.

The strong force is associaed with the gluon.

The Electromagnetism gets the photon.

The Weak force gets the Z and W+/- bosons.

Gravity gets the graviton, but that's mostly a placeholder since we don't know how to properly model gravitational effects with QFT.

Higgs doesn't get associated with a force (yet).
It was the case well before Elon acquired it.
> don't tell yourself it's only good for hashing.

The hash function[1] takes an arbitrary input and generate (in this case) a 32bit integer. This is nessecary to index values that are not integers (such as byte arrays or strings). It also doubles as a way to deterministically randomize values across the keyspace for better distribution of keys.

[1] https://github.com/mkirchner/hamt/blob/main/src/hamt.c#L377
I think this is a much better expression of your point as it makes clear that there is a correlation within a subset of people who have ADHD - rather than implying that all people with ADHD were exposed to trauma as children. Everything brain related is extremely complicated and there are quite a few comorbidities that have already been identified (the ASD-ADHD link for instance) and it's quite possible there is a link for some people between their developmental environment and neurological processing. That overlap isn't all-inclusive though - a fair number of people with ADHD grew up in wonderfully supportive environments.

Brain stuff - it just ain't simple.
Why would another active-nucleus galaxy be notable, anyway? Aren't we awash in them?
What is even the motive to misconstrue the regs here? Just a hatred of asylees?
For aestetics little to none, for overal health and bloating probably better than with think but not as much as we'd like
Paywalled stories are OK if there are straightforward workarounds, which are almost always surfaced on the thread. Stories that people simply can't read without subscribing are off-topic here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10178989
> who would deliberately train a system to detect their own lies?

Maybe an employee required to do so as part of on-boarding to a corporation or government org?

Or maybe someone in the process of a passport or visa application?

This podcast episode [0] with Sean Carroll and Nita Farahany scared the crap out of me on this topic, it seems inevitable.

This is the time to regulate neuro access prior to it becoming big business, and part of the TSA screening process.

[0] https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/03/13/229-...
To be fair, if people just stayed in their houses and didn't use electricity or water and stopped eating and just died when they ran out of food then we could have the whole CO2 problem wrapped up for a good 1,000 years or so in about 40-60 days, assuming they also took the time to gracefully shut down any operating machinery and safely disposed of any hazardous chemicals while waiting for their impending death.

Humanity might go extinct in the process, but they would have at least stopped further destroying the only planet they have to live on in the process.
I get flagged pretty often on here, but every time it happens I can agree "ok damn it they got me". Other times, I know a comment will anger many but is quality and within the discussion, and it stays up.

For how easy it would be to just ban me (which I think has happened before, in the form of a shadowban maybe I forget), it doesn't seem to happen.

Moderation on here is pretty dang good for how large the community is.
> Except that they're proven to not work

It depends on what the goal posts are for what "work" means. I think sanctions work when their cost offsets some of the benefit received through the "undesired behavior" of the target country. They also "work" when the threat of sanctions causes countries to avoid behaviors that would cause them to become sanctioned.

If the goal posts are that sanctions must destroy a country's warfighting capabilities in order to "work", then yes, they almost never work.
I recall seeing some really hacky Java implementations that used thread references for state management... Mostly, in that the same devs expected the same experience in the C# ASP.Net lifecycle and it lead to a lot of wierd race bug conditions in practice.
I would think this would be quite usable when paired with something like Samsung Dex
The lost art of typing in computer games by hand
I'd probably wager that with walking you can go up way steeper inclines than you can otherwise comfortably jog. That might change things considerably. According to one study you burn over 30% more calories walking up a 10% incline (about 17% calories much for a 5% incline).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00219...
I have this feeling the C comma operator was a accident from making function calls work in the beginning. After doing some hobby languages of my own I have come to realize many features are kinda automatic and accidental when writing languages, in a way other programming almost never is.
> MULTIANEWARRAY

Oh, I didn't know that. Weird. IIRC there are no corresponding special instructions for accesses to multidimensional arrays.

> Also, the performance impact has nothing to do with the JIT

What I meant: The authors didn't expect that the JIT compiler would become so good in compiling the bytecode, that the performance difference between contiguous vs. ragged arrays actually becomes relevant.
Fox TV license renewal may be in jeopardy as FCC invites public response
But there's a healthy tension between "moderator and moderated" — people come to a place because it's being shaped in a certain way, but bring their own expectations.

And in tandem, the guidelines grow with the community to reinforce behaviour that's seen to be fruitful and disincentivise behaviour that's derailing.
... "snooty"?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/snooty
This supports a theory that childhood trauma may be one reason of many ADHD might eventually manifest, not a theory that it's the reason ADHD ever manifests. Even here, it's saying 27% of the diagnosed peope had identifiable trauma in their past. That seems to hint there are many other possible causes and ways to treat.
I was there for this. Patches were fairly rare, as every patch required a rather long and annoying downtime. The player base was also split between the official server and a bunch of private ones (nobody I knew played on the official ones), so they couldn't really do anything server-side (I mean they could, but that wouldn't affect all of the players).

There wasn't much of a progress during that week, you needed to be really high up in levels to be able to survive for even a minute after infection. IIRC max level was 70 at the time, and you needed to be in the upper half of the upper half to even be able to react to the infection.

In-game deaths was more of an annoyance than a deal-breaker. You'd spawn back as a ghost at the nearest safe town and then have to walk back to your corpse to revive, so basically for the majority of the players that week I'd just die, walk back to the corpse, respawn, and die again far away after interacting with an NPC, as my line of thinking was that the further I am from bigger cities, the odds of an NPC being infected decreased.
Azure Container Apps Features Made GA and What You Can Do with Them
I want "safety" to be opt-in due to the inaccuracy it introduces. I don't want to pay that tax just because someone is afraid I can ask it how to make a bomb when I can just Google that and get pretty close to the same answer already, and I certainly don't care about being offended by its answers.
I'd have transparent pricing, and some sort of free tier where user gets maybe 2 minute max size videos, 2x per month and maybe can only translate to one other language. Then have a $10 tier for x total minutes of video per month, $35, and $60 tier.
Yes, thank you for the sources.

When I'm hearing now is "ADHD has a correlation with traumatic events." What I was hearing before was "If you don't think your ADHD is a result of trauma, you need to dig deeper."

It goes to show you that what's being written isn't always how folks interpret it.
This is an interesting take as I am on this website precisely to be nerd-sniped and I don’t really feel alone in that aspect.
Just about every single company can benefit from scaling as traffic is never consistent 24/7. Most don't bother as the effort outweighs the savings, but the potential is there. Things like lambda and firecracker make it much easier.
I suggest talking to non law enforcement bureaucrats. The reason you see few examples is because it's rare for a bureaucrat at least in the US to do anything outside the box.
Are there any copilot-style plugins for Sublime Text? I still can't stomach the idea of vs code.
Great since GPT4. However, I need to add some optimization because it's take time for the AI to explore databases / tables schema / structures.
Check out the source code, about 2/3 of the way down this page
https://if50.substack.com/p/the-antagonists
There are tons of people that start off rich and do nothing with it. There are tons of people who start poor and go nowhere with that, or start poor and become rich, and still do nothing with it.

Yes, he was fortunate to be born above an arbitrary rich/poor line that many other people weren't. How about instead of judging him based on something he had no control over (the irony in that judgement is palpable), judge him for what he has done, regardless of where he started from.

I'm not at all a Musk fanboy but he is undeniably a "great" person. He's got ~several~ achievements that would make him a great person, which reinforces the point even more.
Oh yeh definitely. I meant more specifically: might it be possible to capture the electrical signals (much like this current system) from the parts of the motor cortex that create the series of muscle movements that form a 'sign', and then creating a 2d projection/display of these muscle movements and then ... downstream, a gesture recognition solution as u mention (a big downstream challenge).

It sounds like a lot. Was just a thought experiment of how such spinal blocks/paralysis would affect deaf people and how they'd be able to continue to communicate with their deaf partners. Definitely niche but nonetheless interesting, and I think possible using the same general approach as the OP article.

But yeh to then translate gestures to speech is a distinct and incredibly challenging problem on its own as you allude to. Perhaps in the future they can tap into signing/speaking-translators' brains and have AI learn those mappings in a fuzzy way.
Change company. Honestly. If you go as far as to forbid your partners in crime (workers sigh..) to explore new uncharted territory at all - well ya know someone will/might just win by not doing that.
The best – and I think the only – way to discover what good code looks like is to work with it.

Eventually, after working on, say, half a dozen code bases, you'll start to understand intuitively what good code is, providing you get lucky enough to find a good code base, or a code base with a significant amount of good code.

It's a long old journey, but once you have the skill, it never goes away. It's like learning a musical instrument or a foreign language. (By which I mean you can read as many books as you like about it, but without application, you haven't yet begun. Nevertheless, read the books.)

Warning: most developers never attain this skill, but almost all of them believe – truly believe – that they write good code; just as everyone thinks they are a good – nay excellent – driver.

Warning: no one writes good code. Good code becomes good through iteration, just as good writing becomes good by iteration/editing. The reason for this is obvious; but if you don't know why, then you haven't done enough yet.

Warning: everyone has biases. Learn to recognise yours and when you are applying them. Learn to ignore them and see things through a different lens. Explore with an open mind.

Iterating to good code is one of the most satisfying things you can do with software development.
Mine was a story about cockatoos that had a funny twist ending.

I think humour on HN is one of those things that’s, let’s say, “a little bit naughty” - but you can get away with it sometimes if it’s genuine.
Both PTSD and ADHD (and any other mental "disorder") are _defined as_ a list of symptoms, and do not imply different root causes.

see e.g. "The hidden links between mental disorders" https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00922-8 available on sci-hub

"Since the 1950s, psychiatrists have used an exhaustive volume called the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, currently in its fifth edition. It lists all the recognized disorders, from autism and obsessive–compulsive disorder to depression, anxiety and schizophrenia. Each is defined by symptoms. The inherent assumption is that each disorder is distinct, and arises
for different reasons. However, even before the DSM-5 was published in 2013, many researchers argued that this approach was flawed. “Any clinician could
have told you that patients had not read the DSM and didn’t conform to the DSM,” says Hyman, who helped to draft the manual’s fifth edition. Few patients fit into each neat set of criteria. Instead, people often have a mix of symptoms
from different disorders. Even if someone has a fairly clear diagnosis of depression, they often have symptoms of another disorder such as anxiety. “If you have one disorder, you’re much more likely to have another,” says
Ted Satterthwaite, a neuropsychiatrist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

This implies that the way clinicians have partitioned mental disorders is wrong. Psychiatrists have tried to solve this by splitting disorders into ever-finer subtypes. “If you look at the way the DSM has evolved over time, the book gets thicker and thicker,” says Satterthwaite. But the problem persists — the subtypes are still a poor reflection of the clusters of symptoms that many patients have. As a result, the world’s largest funder of mental-health science, the US National Institute of Mental Health, changed the way it funded research. [...]"
Last working version of the homepage from the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20230529224014/http://www.zimbu..... Tried a couple of link, they seem to work.
That's not a force. It's a multiple of the distance.

Which is why absence makes the heart grow fonder.
Nitpick: there's nothing in the data structure that limits it to only fixed-size bit patterns, you could easily have implementations which accept arbitrarily long bit patterns
While it's true that the hashing isn't intrinsic to the mapping of key (bits) to value, hashing is what ensures that the tree stays balanced.

You can absolutely use whatever bits you want, but patterns in the keys will open yourself up to potential loss of performance as the tree will get unnecessarily deep.
[OP/author here]

There's nothing wrong with Debian, if you know how to set up Debian.

But if was easy to set up Debian and get a working desktop without a fair degree of knowledge and expertise, then Ubuntu would never have happened. And yet, it did and it's big and has at least twice as many users as Debian itself... Plus all those on Mint etc.
I find too many foundational problems and contradictions within e/acc to take it seriously. They are speculating with ideas that IMO have potential but the priciples are more a poorly though out sci-fi ideological statement than a philosophically comprehensive theory. Just the first few points of the manifesto make no sense to me:

> The overarching goal for humanity is to preserve the light of consciousness.

If all physical processes are subservient to a thermodynamical "telos", how could any manifestation of free will emerge? Not even going to get into how problematic it is to cite conciousess as a fundamental goal of when we cannot even assess its existence in other beings.

> Technology and market forces (technocapital) are accelerating in their power and abilities. This force cannot be stopped.

What? Cannot be stoped? How could humanity possibly play any role in an unstoppable process? Surely no one can deny capitalism to be the result of specific choices in human history? Hence why we can concieve alternatives to capitalism and can very well choose them over capitalism.

> Technocapital can usher in the next evolution of consciousness, creating unthinkable next-generation lifeforms and silicon-based awareness.

Can? How could it not if the claim is that it's unstoppable? Concisouness again?

> HUMANS HAVE AGENCY RIGHT NOW. WE CAN AFFECT THE ADVENT OF THE INFLECTION IN THIS PROCESS

Scratches head...

I would love to have a rigorous debate about some of these ideas but come on... I was recently in an X space with some of the writers of this manifesto and was very disappointed.
https://environment-review.yale.edu/amounts-burned-areas-hav...

" Yet, the overall trend is a striking. There is a 25-percent decrease in burned areas globally. "

It's going to be fine.
With 400 daily users in the CRM, mysql is not a problem at all. The only problem I have is loading huge tables sometimes without using pagination, but that's from a connection speed problem to the user not a mysql problem. Sometimes the table makes it towards 10+ megabytes and thats a bit goofy.

My question was more based on should I learn the new tech, or any new tech, if I'm now building something I hope will have atleast several thousands daily active users.

Deep down I know the answer. It's pretty obvious mysql won't have problems even for a million users for most types of sites.
There is no dilemma, only good an bad icons. A good icon is self explanatory.