skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your point is unclear. Small businesses are corporations. Advertising services are run by corporations. Tracking is predatory.
1. TL;DR: OpenAI must verify HumanEval data wasn't used in training in order to compare it?

2. Link in the post you replied to.

3. Subjectivity is fine by me! There's a motte & bailey flavor to it if we combine your comment and this one, c.f. "This is why we use the official numbers."
TheBloke discord
In interest to your circumstance, mitigating identity fraud in the sense of situations where people have stolen another person's identity, or people who create completely fake identities, where both of them then committing some other act like theft?

I am curious how it would play out for X, if someone created a new identity and simply attempted to subscribe to their service in that sense.
And what Ive did was only a continuation of the work Dieter Rams was doing his whole career.
Sidestepping the question of whether Twitter rises to the importance of needing verification, I believe that identity verification is a huge missed opportunity for banks. There’s no reason why US users should be sending personal info to an Israeli company for anything, especially this.

A bank has traditionally been the place where we keep our most valuable physical assets. They are secured and insured. Security is part of the service they’re providing. Moving to the digital world, banks could also have been a natural place to store digital assets such as identity info, credit info, and email addresses/phone numbers.

Then, instead of every random website asking for this info and storing it for an indeterminate amount of time, the bank would proxy it to them.

Being a “data bank” would be a highly regulated privilege, with license to store this info. Any non-licensed entity would be prohibited from storing things like SSNs. This reduces the attack surface to only the most important entities. As critical infrastructure, these data banks would also receive periodic stress tests, just as physical banks do today.
I'm wearing one of their calculator watches now, it's my daily driver
From the comments, Forgejo is also already working on implementing ForgeFed, an ActivityPub extension specifically designed for software forges [0]. Judging from the issue, it looks like they're well on their way [1].

I dislike even federated social media, but this is a use for federation I approve of wholeheartedly. The friction of having to create accounts on X forges (where X is the number of projects that self-host) is a huge moat for GitHub, and federation could solve that very handily and create an environment where FOSS projects can feasibly host their own code away from Microsoft's control without horribly inconveniencing everyone who wants to participate.

[0] https://forgefed.org/

[1] https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/59
I just deleted a long comment asking why it said ActivityPub wasn't going to help with "implementing cross-instance forks" - so in case anyone is confused about the same thing: I believe they are saying, they will support cross-instance forks (that's the entire point, and why I was confused), but it won't be AP that's used to do this. AP will just be used for the comments etc.
I actually tried the 4 bit quants (Q4_K_M) and was a bit unimpressed. Switching to Q6_K made a huge difference, but it doesn't fit on my 3090 so it was very slow. And testing on perplexity's website which I presume is fp16 seemed even better, although that might be mostly due to sampler/prompt differences.
Since the cat is out of the bag, no, it's not a typo. it's related to Kardashev but is oriented around the common path most galactic civilizations follow on the path to either senescence (LR8.0) or singularity (LR8.1-4). Each level in LR is effectively unaware of the levels above it, basically because the level above is an Outside Context Problem.

Humans are currently LR2 (food security) and approaching LR3 (artificial general intelligence, self genetic modification). LR4 is generally associated with multiplanetary homing (IE, could survive a fatal meteor strike on the home planet) and LR5 with multisolar homing (IE, could survive a fatal solar incident). LR6 usually has total mastery of physical matter, LR7 can read remote multiverses, and LR8.2 can write remote multiverses. To the best of LR8's knowledge, there is no LR9, so far as their detectors can tell, but it would be hard to say, as LR9 implies existence in multiple multiverses simultaneously. Further, faster than light travel and time travel both remain impossible, so far as LR8 can tell.

“An Outside Context Problem was the sort of thing most civilisations encountered just once, and which they tended to encounter rather in the same way a sentence encountered a full stop.”
― Iain M. Banks, Excession

“Unbelievable. I’m in a fucking Outside Context situation, the ship thought, and suddenly felt as stupid and dumb-struck as any muddy savage confronted with explosives or electricity.”
― Iain M. Banks, Excession

“It was like living half your life in a tiny, scruffy, warm grey box, and being moderately happy in there because you knew no better...and then discovering a little hole in the corner of the box, a tiny opening which you could get your finger into, and tease and pull apart at, so that eventually you created a tear, which led to a greater tear, which led to the box falling apart around you... so that you stepped out of the tiny box's confines into startlingly cool, clear fresh air and found yourself on top of a mountain, surrounded by deep valleys, sighing forests, soaring peaks, glittering lakes, sparkling snow fields and a stunning, breathtakingly blue sky. And that, of course, wasn't even the start of the real story, that was more like the breath that is drawn in before the first syllable of the first word of the first paragraph of the first chapter of the first book of the first volume of the story.”
― Iain M. Banks, Excession
Right. What "reduction in biodiversity" means is that some species will adapt fast enough and some won't. Unfortunately, there is no lower limit to "reduction in biodiversity".
I am sceptical that 14 - 28 FTE will be dedicated to openTF. If I was to guess it is 14-28 people working on their companies offering and when needed upstreaming bug fixes and features, PR review

env0 a small Company is providing 5 FTE, the web claims their revenue is <5m (1.4m)
> You also would not let one football team buy up 60% of the other football teams in the world and merge them into one MEGA-TEAM.

Why not? If that mega-team wants to destroy their revenue stream (People want to watch competitive football, as opposed to curb-stomps), they are free to do that.
Glad you're pointing it out. I still have problems, indeed, having my emails flagged as spam when sent to outlook.com. On gmail.com they go straight to the inbox.

If I understand correctly though, I should have to set a reverse PTR record in the case of setting up my own mail server, right? And I should configure it on the mailserver's side, correct? That's not my case though, I'm just using a custom domain with the MX records pointing to the mail service that I'm using.

I'll just wait a few days cause the domain is new and I guess that's the reason outlook.com flags it.
I can’t guess. Which is the older one?
I still have some in those types sleeves, I guess they're officially mine now.
Wikipedia has this:

The Cochrane collaboration (2013) states that the best quality evidence neither demonstrates a reduction in cancer specific, nor a reduction in all cause mortality from screening mammography. When less rigorous trials are added to the analysis there is a reduction in mortality due to breast cancer of 0.05% (a decrease of 1 in 2000 deaths from breast cancer over 10 years or a relative decrease of 15% from breast cancer). Screening over 10 years results in a 30% increase in rates of over-diagnosis and over-treatment (3 to 14 per 1000) and more than half will have at least one falsely positive test. This has resulted in the view that it is not clear whether mammography screening does more good or harm. Cochrane states that, due to recent improvements in breast cancer treatment, and the risks of false positives from breast cancer screening leading to unnecessary treatment, "it therefore no longer seems beneficial to attend for breast cancer screening" at any age. Whether MRI as a screening method has greater harms or benefits when compared to standard mammography is not known.
I’ve been an Obsidian user for a couple of years and love it. Hitting CMD + u creates a unique note under my “Journal” folder with a filename derived from a datetime string. This keeps notes ordered chronologically and avoids having to name everything up front.

I make liberal use of tags and find that this basically works great - 50 to 100 tags seems to be all I could ever need for both personal and work stuff, which number is quite scalable. However, I had always intended to progressively adopt Zettlekasten, which does sort of seem like the gold standard.

Unfortunately, the way Obsidian works is that you can only really conveniently link to the filenames of other notes, rather than directly to a heading therein. That UX makes it a non-starter for Zettlekasten, for me.

Thought I’d leave this here in case it’s of use to anyone, and would be very interested to hear from anyone who’s landed on a good Zettlekasten setup in Obsidian.

Zettlr looks excellent, and since they both run on a plain folder of markdown files, I might even trial running both together for a bit.
You cannot fake a new identity that doesn’t have any backing in canonical identity systems. With sufficient data enrichment, you can rapidly ascertain which systems are inaccurate or deficient. I recommend https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-63-3 for further reading on digital identity and identity assurance.

I admit my experience in this domain has primarily been in financial services. We have different motivations than say, a social network. We plug into…as much signal is as commercially reasonable. Regardless, your identity assurance level will be governed by the effort and resources you’re willing to sink into the effort (data sources, remote identity proofing, device fingerprinting, activity heuristics, etc). If X wants to make sure you are who you say you are, they can, for a few dollars per user. And if you can’t identity proof because you don’t have a government credential, I’d hazard you don’t have much economic value to the platform (just facts, not a sleight).

For X, if you can show a gov ID that matches your credit card you’re paying with, that’s pretty high confidence you are who you say you are. Otherwise, you’re breaking the law (financial fraud if it’s not your credit card, edge cases aside if someone else is authorizing you to use their plastic).
> ”Like all things Apple, iPad is great if you only use it for the exact, limited use cases it was designed for.”

That’s actually the definition of a product. To create something for specific use cases. That’s not an Apple problem/issue.

Sure, I could use my Toyota Camry (iPad) to haul lumber - but it’d make more sense to use a truck (MacBook) that was designed for those use cases.
What is alarming about it?
When did I say that I was isolating myself? Assuming much?! Live your life the way you want, but do not judge me for having the same privilege!
Its necessary that all and none are both true of empty lists, if they are both defined for empty lists, because otherwise the invariant that all(xs) == none(not x for x in xs) [0] would not hold.

[0] yes, “none()” doesn’t actually exist in Python, but we can imagine that it did, and see that if it did, it should have this relationship.)
> They too are buying from the same chinese OEM, just their "brand sticker" gives them the power to charge a high premium

This is actually incredibly false. I have several collages that came from the automotive industry, for automotive chips. The automotive industry is not using the same Chinese OEM parts, for any of the safety critical ICs, which come in some of those expensive OEM parts.

In fact, they have incredibly complicated processes, with full supply chain lockdown/inspections, to keep cheap Chinese knockoffs out of the supply chain, in direct response to human death from Chinese knockoffs making it into the supply chain. When a knockoff is used, and it makes it into a car, that vendor is blamed, when someone dies. Vendors put extreme pressure on these companies to make sure they don't make the news for killing people/recalls.

All of that, obviously, adds a premium over the unqualified knock offs.

I'm not sure about structural parts, but I suspect it's similar.
The one recommending it for everyone over 40.

They pushback against too much screening is relatively recent, and thus younger doctors are more likely to adopt it.
The activity they plan to send for a merge request.
@dang is a no-op:

<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36526450>

Email corrections to mods at hn@ycombinator.com.

(I've done so in this case.)
Most of the time you are right but rarely that dirt can kill you.
Could you please add the prompt format to the model card, or at least here?
Steve Wozniak – Founders at Work
Untreated detectable cancers still kill relatively quickly, the only time they’re not a major concern is when people have other major medical issues.

For perspective even with all the advances in modern medicine in 2020 and thus a pandemic, cancer was still the #2 killer in the US after heart disease. It killed over 600,000 Americans in 2020 and that’s a 27% improvement over what it was doing as recently as 2001.

That said, there’s currently believed to be a long undetectable period where the body fights off most pre cancers. We’re approaching the ability to detect cancers below 0.5mm which we don’t have much clinical data on.
Gitea and Forgejo have this functionality [0]. I've given up on GitLab ever implementing features that are directed at regular developers any more—they've pivoted to focusing exclusively on the enterprise purchaser rather than the day-to-day engineer.

[0] https://docs.gitea.com/next/usage/pull-request
Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.

Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

If you want a more substantive reply then don't wave about shallow dismissals e.g. "you seemed confused" when you've not actually bothered to do the one thing that would put my replies in context (and would've answered your questions in the first place). Waving the guidelines about is not a substitute for taking the 30 seconds to inform yourself.

I'm not confused and I'm not questioning that you've read the article, I'm stating that you've not. In any case, no matter how much you're trying to avoid being informed, that picture was not taken in San Francisco. Full stop.
Given that LLMs might be a generation-defining technology it's certainly weird that one of the biggest public companies is giving theirs away for free.
A study in Norway I believe said they found heart damage in 1 in 34 people soon after booster administration.

Prove it. Link it and let's see it.

Fauci himself said, I heard the interview myself, that while a young male is more likely to end up in the ER from a heart issue from the vaccine

Prove it, let's see the clip

If you can listen to what Fauci said about heart damage

Link it then
The form factor may not be humanoid, but if we can crack a general-purpose home robot, it would start out as a novelty plaything for the ultra rich, but at that point it would be only a matter of time before it started falling down the cost curve as we got more and more efficient & optimized with the manufacturing and the software. So yes, it almost certainly would eventually get cheaper than human labor. How long until that happens? No idea!
Great, let's build a carbon or pollution tax based off of it
> Like all things Apple …

> … computer running macOS …
Thanks for some more in-depth info, very helpful.
Is chromium a forever chemical? Might want to avoid stainless steel.
Jeebus. That article is both depressing and infuriating ;-(
From the same year: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casio_Cassiopeia

I still have two of these (A-10) and they were great in their day.
I mean, what kind of OS company would want to build software for another companies competing os???

...

https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/microsoft-corporation/id...

:)
The model card is intended to help reproduce the HumanEval results, which we've achieved with no prompt.

However, the model is instruction-tuned to follow completions (not chats). Simply tell it what you want and it should work.
This is a limitation of the NTSC composite signal. Eighty columns of text will never be readable through a composite connection, no matter how good the monitor is.
Web browsers were also a generation-defining technology.
That's the rub, the pay isn't competitive as compared to similar fields and industries
That's true. I suspect if you provide a completely fabricated identity to X they could turn around and report that to the respective state or federal authority who could prosecute you for possessing it with evidence being the act of using it by uploading to that verification service.
I just tried to go with the only iPad Pro for travel option (I really wanted this to work), but had to return it and go back to my MacBook Air. The iPad is just not as good at many basic productivity workflows. Really basic stuff like switching between google sheets and chrome is just really high friction. It’s an amazing consumption device but I just couldn’t get it to work for me
The key sentence here is:

> This is the fundamental difference between the Mac (a platform that basically lets developers and users do anything they want) and the iPad (where if Apple doesn’t specifically allow it, it can’t be done).

Apple (since Lisa/Mac, after Apple II, which had an open architecture) likes appliances and to control the user experience, so the iPad is "more Apple" than Macs are.

Whenever I am waiting at airports, I have to grin at how much stuff people are carrying nowadays: it's not 2, it's 3 full-blown computing devices. First there was the mobile phone (which then just a device to call), then came the laptop,
then the mobile phone became a computer with the iPhone and Android, and finally, the iPad appeared to fill a middle position. You'd think depending on the person, they'd travel with EITHER their phone OR their iPad OR their laptop, depending on whether they are private people, non-technical "creatives" or IT/technical/dev folks, but instead, everybody appears to be travelling with ALL THREE devices instead. That's because - as stated in the article - there are known limit, or people are worried that they may need all devices for particular use cases or data kept on them.

At least - thanks to the EU - soon they can all share the same USB-C charger.

I tried working with an iPad (and later iPad Pro) but eventually got back to a Ubuntu Linux laptop (ThinkPad X1 Nano), which at 970 grams is also lighter than my iPad Pro 10".
Using an Apple MIDI Interface to record an Ensoniq ESQ-1 on a Macintosh SE using Cubase 1.0
> maybe the optimal policy would be to offer it based on a psychological pre-screen?

or have the other ones seek therapy
The AI race to zero is accelerating with Meta who has already won the race. Fuelling an ecosystem of downloadable AI models released for $0 for free for anyone can use, unlike the gate-kept cloud-only AI models which OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are trying hard to compete against Llama which eventually the free AI models will catch up to GPT-4 sooner.

Cloud-only models cannot compete with free and they continue to lose hundreds of thousands of dollars a day, especially OpenAI getting disrupted by the $0 free AI model ecosystem thanks to Meta.

It is clear that the REAL 'Open AI' has always been Meta. Funny how many here dismissed Meta a year ago and since the days of the ConvNet hype, they have been releasing their AI research more frequently than OpenAI is trying to update their GPT model.

For Meta, they are already at the finish line and thanks to them you have CodeLlama; accelerating and driving inflated developer salaries to the bottom. No need for expensive, tired seniors and inexperienced juniors both doing the same developer job worse than two engineers with CodeLlama who can do the same work faster for less.

The future is hiring less developers but utilising AI and not hiring more with extreme inflated salaries.
The point is that if you know the test has so many false positives that you're going to ignore the results, just don't run the test. What's the point of running a test if you're never going to follow up?
Totally, it represents a lack of understanding that they need to invest in workforce training, invest in people, not just find them randomly on the street and expect them to be trained
9.8 sounds more like an easily exploitable RCE than what is IMHO barely even worthy of being called a bug. But as long as there is incentive for the security industry to inflate their accomplishments, they will.
Depends on what you expect it capable of given the limitations of these systems.
I asked some specific questions so I could have a meaningful conversation. It doesn't look like you're interested. Cheers!
We actually specifically don't want this to be our employees. Rather, we want the foundation to employ the maintainers (whom we'll pay for). Which is partially because of the bad incentives the former approach creates.

Disclaimer: Work at Spacelift, and currently temporary Technical Lead of the OpenTF Project, until it's committee-steered.
An Oral History of Redman's Notorious MTV Cribs Episode
underflow in this case
Cool

>is capable of detecting these classes of items in overhead images ranging in altitude from about 30 feet to satellite imagery

Yep, that’s the issue with YOLO algorithm, close objects, it is the reason why in a previous drone project we used SSD instead, processing a 4K realtime footage.
I don't think it's any more stable, dependable or predictable than any similarly mature Linux distro. It's just a preference, perhaps with a sliver of contrarianism.
Yeah, it's especially unfortunate with all the vendor lock-in that Github's managed. Jumping ship to something with a usable interface means not contributing to a huge number of open source projects.
i explained this in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37267690 except that i suggested using a better measure than crude fatality rate, such as daly

this is not a global optimization problem; it's a local optimization problem. one person is deciding whether or not to spend their own money on an mri, or a blood test or whatever, on themself. they are the ones in the best position to do that, and for very-low-risk tests like mris it is very rare that the optimal decision is for a rich person not to get them

another nuance is that you don't have to be extremely confident that the mri or biopsy or whatever will increase your expected daly or qaly or whatever; in the cases where you're not extremely confident, it's because it doesn't matter much either way, because you're weighing two extremely small risks against each other. if you make the wrong decision and lose (in expectation, risk-adjusted) a hundredth of a qaly to a blood test or an extremely unlikely cancer, it wasn't a terrible decision, just a small mistake

(even if that small mistake kills you in three months)

the cases where the decision matters, it's easy to get enough information to be extremely confident
Look, I get that you're trying to be malicious, but you could do a better job than that. They literally describe what the criteria for successful design reviews are in Appendix 3.

Hint: Design reviews are not "powerpoints". They're typically several hundred to several thousand page technical documents.
Researchers Dispute High-Profile Discoveries of Cancer Microbes
It's the #bacon of the sea.
Ig Nobel candidate or am I missing the broader application?