skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hardware denouncing is really easy to implement, you only need a 0.1uF capacitor, an 1k resistor and a 7414 (Schmitt trigger inverter). If your feeling particularly fancy and price is not a concern the LS18 is magical.

That said, I agree that using an MCU is even easier and almost always cheaper if when you choose the appropriate chip.
Maybe, except folks have been trying to get no-code working for literally decades; AI code gen is new and still learning…
Python and JavaScript both had their various fragmented package management systems added well after the language was invented and suffer for it. JavaScript is especially hobbled by the need for an intermediary bundling step.

More modern languages like Rust, where tooling was carefully designed in tandem with the initial language release, fare much better in this regard.
The thing that drives me insane about Python packaging is the degree of Stockholm Syndrome. PYTHON PACKAGING HAS KIDNAPPED YOU. YOU DON’T ACTUALLY LOVE IT.

None of Go, JavaScript, or Rust require a half a day to figure out packaging. Don’t defend Python. Push for it to change or leave it behind.
>If the hidden service operator is aware that the site is receiving high traffic, could the operator run several sites operating as mirrors, so that users had options if, e.g., one site was not responding fast enough. Is there guidance published anywhere on what is the the "normal" traffic for a service.

I think this[1] would help.

[1]https://onionbalance.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Already has 4k subs but thought this one is promising

Free hand soldering a BGA ram chip onto a raspberry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pW4_nqcIWA
Cloud run has abandoned gvisor in their "second generation" execution environment for containers

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/serverless/cloud-run-...

Obviously there might be many reasons for that, but as someone who worked on a similar gvisor tech for another company, it's dead in the water. No security expert or consultant will ever sign off on a process isolation model. Despite of architecture, audits, reviews, etc. There is just too much surface area for anyone to feel comfortable signing off on hostile multi-tenants with process isolation regardless of the sandboxing tech.

Not saying that there are no bugs in hypervisors, but the surface area is so so much smaller.
My understanding was that renormalization only needs "parameters" when the computational methods are approximate.

I thought the issue was more that we have no idea how to perform appropriate calculations for SM+QG? Maybe I'm wrong?
I tried to do some other fun things like going row by row with each row only contributing one letter and seeing what’s the longest word I could come up with.

If I start at the top row and go down, I can make TAXES but couldn’t think of a longer word. The third row having no vowels makes it so hard.

Starting at the bottom row and going up, I came up with CHICKEN which is delicious and neat that it ends where it started. Chickens is longer but ends on the middle row which is not as neat I feel like :(
No, you are correct, it's just hard to debug something and produce a minimal case when the only change is "performance bad". This is mostly a hint to people that may run into similar issues while upgrading.

And my reference concerned this comment (which I may have misunderstood, sorry if that's the case):

> It is not planned for any patch releases because it is only a performance issue and not a malfunction.
To be fair, (most) humans have enough self awareness to (most of the time) know when they're lying. Theoretically, it's an easier problem.
Approx 0% of devs need to know what the earth is, but from lots of interviews I've given I've found consistent correlation between lack of basic knowledge and lack of ability to solve many things. It was so strong we found it much more cost effective to cut people early that didn't know at least a few of some standard knowledge items.
Maybe, he was just trying to answer a question
you can check derivative of the debt growing curve, there are 2 clear shifts in 2008 and 2020, which both happened because of specific policies applied.
It would indeed disappoint the user hoping his CMOS fedback inverter gets faithfully destroyed.

Whereas less destruction of electronics -> more faithful "experimenting with and learning about logic" as per the device's purpose.
They have a working agreement that allows no weapons within two kilometers of the demarcation line. Hence the medieval weapons.
Honestly I just want a sync solution I can host on my NAS that the mobile app can still access, which unfortunately isn't something the app natively supports, and more or less all of the current community solutions come with one caveat or another ( like the otherwise lovely git solution having issues on iOS clients, for example )
For lidar surely, but what about the ultra sonic sensors?
It is implied. Or do you think he removed himself? Because that is the only other option.
It's always tempting to impute / unlikely virtues to the cute
We’re in peak hype cycle for AI. You’re always doing to need cut and dry, deterministic processing of structured data. That’s what low-code is for in many cases.

You’ll hit a simple wall with AI, as with any tool, where you need domain knowledge and language to tell the thing what to do. The difference will probably be more SMEs who can tell the computer vs developers and product managers figuring out what the business wants.

Look at stable diffusion prompts. There’s an art to constructing the prompts - it’s just another form of programming.
Radiodurans probably still has some limit where the rate of radiation is higher than its ability to repair fragmented DNA, at which point things snowball and the DNA is quickly broken down to its constituent bases and there would be no template at all in which to initiate any repair.
Longevity gene from naked mole rats extends lifespan of mice
shared this link on another reply, but google moved away from gvisor to hypervisor for cloud run. It won't be long before they do for GKE as well

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/serverless/cloud-run-...
One issue is the trend to monochrome icons (which makes everything look the same), which in turn is linked to the use of vector graphics for resolution independence. When everything was low-DPI, pixel-based icons could be much more expressive, and often had more detail than current vector icon sets.

Random example: https://www.techonthenet.com/excel/questions/neg_time_calcs....

The Visual Studio 2010 Image Library is a pinnacle example of that era: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/visualst...

It should be noted that these need to be viewed with 1:1 pixels on a non-hi-DPI display to be truly appreciated.
That's kind of more the freenet model (content based), where tor is traditionally anonoymous TCP real time networking.

I dont really see how it minimizes traffic on the network though. You still have to talk to the CDN nodes.
This runs locally on a MacBook.
You should go upthread and argue with this guy, seems like the two of you are at the same level of yelling-for-fun

> You are not providing licensed medical services. Just come out and say it, since it's true.
Really surprised by the positive comments here.

The article provided a grocery list of concurrency primitives which IMO: was designed to paint the misleading picture that concurrency in Python is too hard (when everyone just uses the excellent and standard asyncio library in practice.) Then the article ends with the faulty conclusion not to use any concurrency primitive. (Again, why? Where is the logic in this conclusion?) Python's asyncio library handles both CPU-bound work and I/O bound work. It has data structures for queues, call backs, push and pull style usage, sleep, 'background' execution, future results, and much more. It's very well designed and tested.

The article vaguely alludes to async tasks being hard to debug because their execution order is obscured. But... that's kind of the point of using them. Programs written to use this logic flow don't have to be weighed down waiting for every result. It's a huge benefit in Python land where you have a GIL on a core and it's able to switch between multiple tasks without blocking the others for no reason. The article didn't provide any reason why you would want to consider other options to asyncio which makes their inclusion seem like more of a flex than anything.

I'm wondering now if most of the commenters here were just OPs friends shilling their support for something they don't understand.
In the case of the interface shown in the train video, the key thing the operator will rely on is the fixed physical position of the controls first, then their shape, dimension, and color.

The icons really aren’t going to matter as much. And I’d argue they’d probably be better off replaced by text labels. Imagine a new operator in a stressful situation being guided eg on the phone - how would you describe to them which of the 2 buttons with a center arrow with a curve to their right they should press, for the control panel at 4:31? You’ll end up saying “the center left/right button”, or “the one above the green P button” because those icons are pretty hard to distinguish.

Swap the icons between 2 controls one day, and watch even the most skilled operator make mistakes.
I wonder if it would be possible to securely offload some of the aes processing to the proof of work cpus. Or make ddos requestors perform a fourth layer of encryption/routing, possibly of data, possibly noise.
>Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data.
Why I started Sleepfriends:

1. I've suffered on and off with insomnia and difficulty sleeping in the last five years.

2. In the past 5+ years I've been doing coaching, whenever I've done guided relaxation and visualisation with my clients via Zoom, they've fallen asleep so easily - and it's been hard to wake them up after! And whenever I would hang out with my best friend over Zoom, I would feel more relaxed and able to sleep.

3. I later discovered this "social relaxation effect" was due to Polyvagal Theory, ie. when we have quality connection with people we feel safe with, this helps put us into 'Connection Mode', where neural circuits are triggered in our bodies that calm the heart, relax the gut, and turn off the fear response. If you feel safe, calm and relaxed, you will fall and stay asleep much easier.

4. The problem with meditation apps, the sound of rain and podcasts, I believe they miss a vital ingredient for relaxation: real-time human connection.
another obvious move would be moving app to the same cloud too..
unlimited means exactly that.

dont say it if you dont like the aftertaste.

lawsuits have occured over similar conditions ending in favor of account holders.

Dropbox could be in for some fun times.
Brian Eno message – Don't get a job [video]
Amazing how such basic common sense got lost sometime in the past 15 years. Perhaps using an icon for a 3-5 word phrase describing an abstract idea is daft? Wow! Who would have thought?! (Answer: certainly not any so-called "UX designer" I've met in the past 10 years.)

This is before you even get to the dumbness that ensues by the UX designers getting confused to whether a button that is a toggle should have the icon representing the current state, or the state that clicking it will cause to happen, like every other button in existence. (Think of the Mute button in every videoconferencing app -- at least Zoom still has a text label on it though!)
There is no reason to believe that Gore who contemporaneously expressed support for a different strategy would have followed the exact same track as Bush.

You can't actually reject that dynamic we are stuck with it until we fix it.
> I've been asking myself that for a while. Would they be so popular if they didn't host & serve petabytes of model files for free? How will they monetize that aspect to match this valuation?

From what I gather it's mainly hosting with some maintaining of a few libraries, but then I recently starting to see they are offering lots of classes via DeepLearning platform; these lat couple of months as an AI student I've been asked to enroll into classes (temporarily for free) to assess where they are, here is the most recent example [0].

To what end, I'm not entirely sure, but I guess it's to get an overall pulse on what can be monetized and take it from there? I really think that this a low number compraed to where we were in the last few years, but ti also shows how little investment actually exists in the AI and ML space: consider that Git got bought by M$ for 7.5B and then tried cash in on it by releasing Co-Pilot and then got into legal issues as a result and then tried it's hand with Open AI and $10B.

This is starting to seem like a reversion to the mean, and AI's promise was always to lower the cost to everything it can, but I think one of the harder pills to swallow is that the traditional VC model is not really being supported after all the hype and losses.

Personally speaking, I'm thinking of moving on to Cyber Security after my finals this semester; I come from Bitcoin and the hype cycles there are something I was looking to get away from after nearly 13 years in that side of fintech.

0: https://www.deeplearning.ai/short-courses/
Not if they care about privacy and security IMO. At the least the tech savvy would want decent adblocking.
Interesting how having intellectual curiosity as the goal, rather than the ubiquitous 'an inclusive space where everyone can feel safe', has ended up in a forum that's much 'safer' and less toxic than most places on the Internet.
A good school would provide this. Does that make them a medical service? Or is this actually educational?
“Self explanatory” doesn’t exist. There are only icons that people have seen before (and recognize), and those they haven’t.
Snap Electronics.
Insults are not allowed on HN. Please do better.
I've had success with Psychology Today search in the Seattle area --- if a provider is full or has no openings, ask if they know anyone who is not. That has also helped me!
Why not Tailscale drop? Cross platform, even mobile. Reliable. Fast. Easy.
So now you have the drawbacks of both as well, in that the guy who has the most compute to use as a toaster can DoS everyone else.

Plus, PoW is nothing but wasted, needless computation. Computing is not free. Every watt spent doing anything PoW is just that much more intensification of our current climate crisis.

As someone with temps of 109 with heat index of 120 coming in the next few days, with all due respect, fuck anyone who proposes PoW is a good idea for anything.

It isn't interesting. It's the most egregious example of conspicuous consumption on the planet.
If you're stealing from Dollar Tree, you're either truly needy or just in it for the thrill of being antisocial. Their stuff hasn't got any value in the store, much less fenced.
Isn't what you're proposing an entirely new product? How could an engineer put that together in two weeks?
Well there's same region, same AZ (if AWS), and same machine. Different levels of location for GCP or whatever. Same machine is probably never doable on a cloud provider, but it's rare that you'll need that.
Sure, but if we are talking about a place where let's say functional programming is off-limits entirely (note that I wasn't strictly talking about functional programming in my previous posts; I was talking about anything, any paradigm or tool which helps write more sound, more provable, more stable and less buggy programs)... then the "discipline yourself and enjoy the benefits of FP in less capable languages" will not work either, because in that place, they clearly don't recognise the benefits, the language doesn't encourage it either, so they'll just write the average code as usual.

I am not insulting people personally, I am insulting the "worse is better" culture which is prevalent in the profession. No one has an immutable opinion about this, and I do not think that looking down upon an opinion or set of beliefs is a hostile thing. In a (slightly weird) way, it's actually constructive because it might plant a seed of thought in people that it's possible to do better. I'm doing the opposite of looking down at or insulting people here - I am assuming they are rational and capable of thinking, they just haven't encountered a different mindset than the prevalent and trendy one, and that's a perfectly fine thing.

"Developing/using better tools, languages and trying to change developer culture" is a solution. Sure, not a silver bullet or something achievable quickly or easily, but on a smaller scale, it's definitely possible to achieve success.
2010-2012, I’d say. Too lazy to search through the comments back then. I also remember when meta discussions/posts like this one were actively discouraged, I’d say that lasted for longer.

Slightly related to the topic of moderation and this forum, the people behind it should really do something about allowing users in here to delete their comments/past history. We’re only a doxxing event away from making the news (this forum was no better than Reddit when it came to the Boston bombing, as an example and talking about doxxing).
Washing instructions are internationally standardized though, and if you really wanted to you'd look them on your phone.

I don't want a hippy brand to write a 50 lines poem instead. Nor do I want "woogie boogie wash only" jargonning that felt cute to the copy righter, nor do I want to try to understand the Indian instructions.
A good explanation of the algorithm is here: https://github.com/tevador/equix/blob/master/devlog.md

> they are talking about 1 minute solve times once a DDOS is detected.

The point of this is to prevent an existing easy DoS attack (introduction flooding) into a partial outage/slow down. It's an incremental improvement on a hard problem.
That is why the sweet spot is internal company apps. They can be less polished and just need to be useful enough but not
SaaS level generic.
Oof dead for sure
> The article says that there is only a factor of 6 in solution time between a high end server and low end phone. How is that possible? The server likely has much more than 6x the ram and cpu count (and faster cpus) than the phone.

The limiting factor if equihash is allegedly memory bandwidth, which maybe doesn't vary that much between srrvers and phones.
There is no such elephant in the room. Your abject dismissal of the real harms and problems that people struggle with as a result of this real and well-established disease is harmful, hateful, bigoted, ignorant, and shameful.
It’s just pseudo code, relax. You’re not a compiler. You know what they meant.
Out of context, That is wildly accurate. Older people will tsk tsk when they hear about that kind of thing, but most people in rural areas use it as an excuse to recount their dumb teenage stories. When I got a speeding ticket was when I found out my father got a ticket when he was riding a piece of waxed cardboard behind a car on a snowy highway.

No hacker context, but a truism.
Is there anything like gitignore.io for robots.txt files? Like, select a set of known bots and get a list of rules tailored to them.

Bytedance's crawler should probably be blocked too, based on a recent mattKC video.

I assume google's training bard with their search engine crawling data, so you have an incentive to allow them.
Mine were:

- The New Yorker (subscription offer)

- Bon Appetit Magazine (subscription offer)

- Charles Tyrwhitt dress shirts

- An Online Masters in Data Science from Berkeley

- Travel to Switzerland

- Travel to Norway
patch releases are the third number (e.g. the "1" in "3.43.1"). The comment says nothing about it not qualifying as work to be done for a minor release (e.g. the "43" in "3.43").

If the bug is closed, and you still see it happening, file a new bug with a reproducible example so that the maintainers know it's (still) happening. And if that example means setting up a small dedicate repo with enough data to show the problem off, that's probably worth doing.
It's the next step after the phone number. I went through the same process this morning. After you upload the selfie they perma-ban your account so you can no longer get any support whatsoever.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37254898
see

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/serverless/cloud-run-...
> You'll only really know if it's good code (or why) after you start trying to change it.

I like this and it is true. In addition, I have found that good code also tends to survive refractors despite having the quality of being easy to change.

The Ask HN post specifically mentioned good code but what follows are some (of my subjective) thoughts about the benefits of reading bad code. Bad code is haphazard and varied and good code is “samey”. You are a pattern matcher and this is part of your training. Good code will make more of an impact on your understanding if you have read a lot of bad code beforehand. Being able to read and understand bad code is a far more lucrative skill to have in the workplace than being able to quickly understand good code. In a big team you will spend a lot (most if you’re senior) of time reading other people’s code. Best to get good at it.

I have yet to be presented with a steaming mess of code to read and explain to an interviewer; yet it is the very first thing most new joiners face at any seniority level.
That only mitigates the problem of the official launcher not existing for Linux. Games are still installed with Proton.

For example, I was trying to install Into The Breach, which is available on both Steam and Epic. Steam has builds for all platforms, while Epic only has the Windows build. If I install the game using Heroic, it installs it with Proton, resulting in worse battery life and performance compared to the native build. Which is what you want to avoid with handhelds like the Steam Deck.
Do people at higher latitude have better skin and live longer?
Terraform Cloud is down for nearly five hours, and counting
Yeah, pretty much this. Valve is putting in the work to make Linux gaming actually viable, so I'll send them my business. If Epic wants to catch up, more power to them. Until their launcher at a minimum actually works on Linux, I won't be sending them any money. As I said, I'll just wait for the games to come to Steam or, worst case, never buy them if they're permanently exclusive. I have plenty of backlog!
Do not upload that selfie. If you read online you will find it is a trap that perma-bans your account.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37254898
I suspect they're off by at least an order of magnitude in that estimate, if not two (or more if GPU acceleration is possible).
Magic Mountain – What Happens at Davos?
> easier to find in moments when speed is of the essence

This is, for me, categorically untrue, it's quite the opposite. I am sure it must vary from person to person. I find myself wondering whether people tolerate or like icons-only because they would find the actual reading of an array of text buttons fatiguing. I'm not better than someone who finds reading more time consuming or difficult than I do, but I do kind of resent that UIs appear to be designed to cater to the less literate, because of how slow it is for me to pick the correct icon out of 7 very similar ones.

It's especially bad because these should just be preferences. Give me text and lose the icons altogether. Others should be free to have icons.
I do have ADHD. Living with it kind of sucks for a lot of the reasons mentioned in TFV. It can also be a superpower, particularly with adaptive coping skills.

I should also point out that I have both ADHD and rather high general intelligence. At any given IQ, measures of academic success are lower for those with ADHD. There's also survivor-bias in that I couldn't be posting this if I had died from reckless behavior.
This looks like a really cool project. Is it open source?