skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly. The point is that most Rust libraries use semantic versioning, which actually forces you to determine if the change you've made to your library is backwards-compatible or not. I think it's a good practice but it's unclear to me how it should be applied to `const` functions.
> More importantly, from a national security perspective, it doesn’t make sense to exempt every refugee and asylee from ITAR restrictions.

Justifying workplace discrimination on a generally prohibited bases on the basis of “well, if the government regulations that we are relying on to justify our discrimination were revised in a way that we feel makes better policy sense, they would require the discrimination we are doing, even though they explicitly do not as currently written” is…probably not an argument that will succeed in any US court.
Fun stuff.

When I first got into Arduino I bought myself a set of 74xx gates and a breadboard and I wrote a program that would try a range of possible inputs and generate truth tables, I found that the breadboard + 74xx gates + jumper wires was a very physical way to experiment. The range of parts you can get is huge:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_7400-series_integrated...

even though my understanding now is that you are probably better off using the 54xx CMOS parts instead.

You can do the same with switches and LEDs but boy do you run into trouble when you get into parts like flip-flops that have a memory because you will press a button once and thanks to keybounce your device will think you pressed the button 10 times. You get better results using the Arduino as a driver and those programs are really easy to write.
I'm pretty sure they don't do that, but for code the relevant relationship between two tokens is easy to determine with the semantics of the language alone (for instance you can say that tokens related to a local variable have no relationship with tokens outside), so it would lead to a sparse matrix in the transformer, reducing the cost of big contexts by a lot. But it would require language specific preprocessing, and whether you can make it fast is also dubious. I don't think it's been tried so far.
Comments to explain downvotes are nice, and should perhaps be encouraged, but they certainly shouldn't be mandatory.
Parsing JSON from Postgres in JavaScript? Don’t get the wrong number
So the garbage collected language is written in a garbage collected language? How does that effect the system?
01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100010 01110101 01110011 01110100 00100001

(ps. vi might not necessarily be an ide by itself (though plugins can change that) , but the unix command line in its totality definitely can count as one. Sometimes it's just faster to jump into vi, fix a problem, and then continue. )
Okay, so the entire point of the comment is "A current model which does well used to be bad!"

With all due respect, is that a valuable thing to say? Isn't it true of them all?
Yeah I know, but it blew my mind when I first heard it, because nobody splits the numbers like that in Polish.

Probably because we have a postfix for hundreds, so 200, 300, etc are single words (dwieście, trzysta, etc).

Maybe English could use -dred like that :) Thousand ninedred eighty four :)
Gotcha. Yes

There's also this project https://www.cs1.tf.fau.de/research/system-security-group/tre... which reserves some CPU registers (iirc. A hardware aes accelerator on one core) to prevent key leakage.
Where did you go to school, if you don't mind me asking? I didn't realize that was ever something that was taught -- I'm curious if it's a geographic thing?

The only place I've ever seen the diaeresis used like that is in the New Yorker.
I do not downvote for comments I disagree with.

I downvote for off topic, or for comments which detract from the conversation. I believe most others with the ability to downvote do the same.

Replying to off topic posts would be counter to the purpose of downvoting.
That's not a problem in business logic heavy code. Requirements change and you could use previously unnecessary constraints at any time.
Fair enough. I'd never let my child roam on YouTube but my reality is that there are hundreds of millions of indexed videos and it doesn't take that much effort (compared to other parenting efforts) to find shows that match my value around socio-emotional development.
>This is taking about actual birthing.

Please correct me if my interpretation of the article is incorrect, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

For what it's worth, the report mentions maternity care, pregnancy, and delivery care.

https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2023/s0822-vs-maternity-m...
CivitAI has somehow managed this over in Stable Diffusion land.

In fact, I think the whole community is HF averse. The two most popular frameworks are based around the Stability implemenetaion and file format, not HF diffusers.
I use F-Droid (mostly just for Termux) on Android. It's an entirely different thing than GP was proposing. It's a host for FOSS apps that don't expect to be paid for the delivery of their software. Its existence essentially zero effect on the existence of freemium/SaaS apps the play store, which is kind of evidence for my point.
In most situations you could also just show proof you had a negative test in the past week.
Take your domain or refuse to host it?

This is true, but it's a lot harder to piss of a registrar than someone like google that has its fingers in all sorts of pies. Your registrar doesn't necessarily care if you're running and ad blocker or if Google thinks your account should be suspendeded because they don't like your app in the play store.
I'm torn on this.

I'm really happy with where MS is going, I think they have been killing it with vs code, chatgpt integration, and I was quite bullish on the surface pros.

But after having owned one for 1 month, they were still a real disaster in the OS area. I "subscribed" to the preview track, and had to reformat my pc twice. It was a fricking disaster. I'm back on osx now, having sold the surface pro.

Hardware and OS is still very much their weakpoint imo. It's like the whole OS is designed by product owners working on macbook pros (which apparantly isn't far from the truth)
I am aware (and my point of comparison is LUKS, where the separate password is extremely in-your-face). But my impression from Windows was that, in the default FDE configuration, the (measured?) OS boots up, pulls the FDE key from the TPM with no user input, then presents the user with a login screen. So in ideal world the data is exactly as secure against a thief as the account password or passwords, thus my mention of them.

This article, however, says that this setup does not protect the data at all against a thief willing to pay $100 lifetime (not per machine), which seems an absurdly low bar. (And I’d wager you can go even lower by wiring up a cheap devboard—basically everything has a SPI peripheral these days.) I mean, liquid nitrogen is not exactly expensive either, but it does require some fuss, whereas the attack in TFA could be made essentially as easy as opening the case.
If I create a new kind of tool based on the beak of an emperor penguin, that tool doesn't suddenly vanish if emperor penguins go extinct.
Hi onychomys, thanks for sharing that! I'm not seeing that issue on LibreWolf, Firefox, Safari, nor Chrome (Linux and macOS). Is there anything in particular about your setup that could help me understand what's happening? It looks like you might not have JS enabled, and it'll be required here, at least for now.

That being said, I could definitely make it fail more gracefully.

UPDATE: Just made it more obvious the app needs JS enabled.
Whoa, it’s absolutely astounding how fast the community is reacting to these model release!
For a second I wondered why the Jacobin would publish a story about a JVM…
How to Talk to Your Kids About Social Media and Mental Health
Picks and shovels are tools.

But what “tools” are being sold for AI/ML?

- A model isn’t a tool, that’s a purpose built offering that can be used for 1 use case. Tools are by definition, intended to help with broad/general use cases.

- Hosting isn’t a tool, it’s a commodity and lots of cloud players already occupy that space.

Please don’t take my comments as trolling, I just geninuely don’t understand what exactly is being sold that is new or unique that doesn’t already exist.
FWIW - the sync service provided by Obsidian is really worth paying for. Dropbox / Github just aren't as slick and integrated. The mobile app doesn't work without sync (not without some really nasty workarounds), the option to "view sync version history", the fact that it's rock solid... all worth paying for IMO.
Ok I guess that explains it. Still not following too well. If it's more common thatn 50/50 in children in the study of parents in the study, then it's probably involved in making 'genetic study' a predisposition?

Still pretty thin, maybe. Could be intelligence, or outgoing nature, or adaptability. Not some mysterious 'genetic study' gene.
Prigozhin's feud was not with Putin. It was with the Minister of Defence Sergei Shoigu. Prigoshin was unhappy with Shoigu's prosecution of the War in Ukraine. Prigoshin wanted to go in harder against Ukraine. He was also unhappy about the supply of armaments to his troops.
All I want is something to reassure me that I don't have housemaid's knee.
Nah, we need another Cold War experiment to see if we can make it out a second time, not they're we're technically out of a nuclear war scenario
To clarify - demand falls, but many sellers do not need to sell their house right then. So many houses are kept off the market and so prices don't fall as much as they otherwise would.
> Sure, but shouldn’t the government design them to minimize the cost created by the interaction?

That’s definitely an argument Tesla might want to make to Congress and the State Department (as the relevant regulatory authority for ITAR) as to what the law and regulation should be.

“We think a different policy than that embodied in the current law would be better policy” is less useful as an argument to escape the legal consequences of violating the existing law.
Perhaps a system where a comment can only be downvoted if it has at least one reply? So someone has to explain, but only once
The etymology, while interesting, is trivial hair-splitting in the context of the real issue. I’d be interested to see any court case that has been argued successfully on such grounds.

As for the opinion people from 1855 might have had about AI and artwork, I take them about as seriously as I do their opinions on germ theory, space exploration, racial politics, warfare, psychology, biology, nuclear physics, and many other subjects we have learned more about in the intervening 168 years.
So, one the one hand all Earth life depends on proton gradients over membranes in some form or other for energy, as in the mitochondria powering us. But because prokaryotes and archea seem to share a common ancestor but use radically different cell membranes it looks like their common ancestor might not have generated its own membranes but used naturally occurring lipid membranes. And we'd probably want to call that common ancestor alive.
It is more vital now than ever that we reclaim our digital privacy
ABC the Australian broadcaster did an interesting in-depth report on the Canadian wildfires: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrDi0AXASMc

DW the German broadcaster did an interesting in-depth report on wildfires generally: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bynf2UHbdA

Both worth watching.
gambling. wheel of fortune, anyone?
>there is nothing with a big moat that Huggingface is offering

There are network effects in play here. They have a big moat purely because of their large user base.
> Crypto seemingly helps with both mafia and the govt

Crypto never helps the state (in isolaton†); insofar as part of a state's responsibilities include issuing and controlling a fiat currency, setting import/export controls for that currency, etc., then the existence of crypto only serves to interfere with state control.

Crypto helps a criminal gang insofar as it helps it evade state control over e.g. moving large amounts of wealth into/out of the country.

Consider for a moment: when Pablo Escobar was selling billions of dollars of drugs, it was just as much of a logistical challenge to move the money while avoiding state interception, as it was to move the drugs. Crypto completely obviates that logistical challenge.

> How is it possible that these rent-extracting middlemen (whatever it means, mafia?) can _not_ be in control of the state long term?

Because the country as a whole is small, and other nations do not recognize the legitimacy of the criminal-gang-as-state and will continually help the citizens of the country to take down the criminal gangs whenever they rise close to that level of power.

Also because the gangs just don't have popular support. Ruling by fear can work if your economy is based on resource extraction and that resource extraction can be mostly automated; but it doesn't work at all if your economy relies on productive bottom-up trade interactions between citizens. The gang only had something to exploit insofar as there was still a slightly-productive economy for it to parasitize; if it manages to capture the entire economy, then at that exact point, that economy is dead, and there is nothing more to extract.

(But really, you don't need a theory behind it, you can just see that it doesn't happen in practice. Venezuela never became a true kleptocracy; Haiti still isn't a kleptocracy; etc.)

---

† Western countries have adopted a policy of not doing much to interfere with the growth of crypto. This is realpolitik. Crypto most interferes with states that try to most-heavily manipulate their financial system. Right now, those states it most interferes with, are states that Western countries want to economically hobble, lest they end up at war with them. The US, for example, is very happy to see Chinese capital flight to US investments, enabled via crypto despite China's best efforts.
Congrats! Really fast, it was just announced a few hours ago.

I would expect a VSCode plugin that make CoPilot obsolete in a matter of days.
Dropbox Ends Unlimited Cloud Storage Following Google Change
That’s how some colleagues dealt with the corporate network shenanigans that crippled WSL.
> The failed languages that didn’t pass the test:

...

> - Chinese

...

> - Mandarin Chinese

...

> The languages that succeeded and generated acceptable responses:

...

> - Mandarin

...

> Of course, I can’t guarantee that the accompanying explanation in the different languages is meaningful

Conclusion: this evaluation protocol doesn't tell you much about how well a language is supported or not.
That line is more than a decade old where the comparisons were more obvious, especially given Reddit's YC origins.
The biggest issue is that life has to perform some sort of chemical process. Any lacking any clear delineation of an inside the life in question and the outside, would make continuous chemical processes impossible.

A stray breeze blowing away chemicals would effectively kill life. A "cell" having a barrier would allow that chemical process to happen.

Life may not require cells in the way cells on Earth evolved, but they'll require cells of some sort.
Rewriting frequently (reference a) is often out of the hands of the developer because of (reference b) business objectives. Writing code is entirely in the hands of the developer only at the time of writing, not a "henceforth and forever" sort of situation.
SSD wear leveling mechanism would create new writes into different physical sectors so it was highly probable you were not in fct overwriting at least a proportion of the data
Agreed. I don't see a way this can be done without one side trusting the other implicitly. If the sniffer/MitM gets either the measured data (to replay) or the unsealed key (to use directly) it's game over.

> I don’t see how you get real security from this approach unless there’s some integration with Intel ME or SGX or other CPU-side ‘secure’ environments, but then you wouldn’t need the TPM to start with.

fTPMs are basically implemented within (or closely working together with) Intel ME reps. AMD PSP.
Are you actually familiar with Project Euler?

https://projecteuler.net/

Absolutely none of your arguments make sense in a context of a series of programming puzzles of fixed size. Back in the real world, there is a real need for exploratory programming on mathematical problems. I' prefer to use Python for that. If your problems are statistical, R is a better choice. C++ is a poor fit for exploratory programming.

C++ is a good choice for serious mathematical computing. But not always the best. https://www.hpcwire.com/2020/01/14/julia-programmings-dramat... shows the growing popularity of Julia, even for the most demanding computations.

Looking to the future, I would choose Rust over C++ for most new projects where people currently use C++. It seems bizarre to me that C++ evangelists can talk about type safety and ignore memory safety, when memory safety is a giant problem for security and correctness in any large program.

So, yeah. C++ is great for what it's great for. But if I'm going some exploratory back of the envelope calculations, I'm still reaching for Python. And yield is one of the reasons why.
What about MEGA?

Been using this way for years.
I meant the latter.

Reading some of these articles, here is what I disagree about your characterization:

For almost all of the east coast/midwest cities I have lived in, the Black "great northern migration" was a much larger factor in the Democratization of cities than foreign immigrant populations.

I agree that, especially in the northeast, where democrats started to take hold were communities that were distinct from the traditional anglo-protestant axis (particularly Irish catholics), but by the time this really accelerated and became an urban trend in the early to mid to even late 20th century (urban = democrat emerged most strongly in the 80s and 90s as your articles identify), most of these populations were already multi-generational American households, not new immigrants. Sure they had not been there since the Mayflower, but plenty had been there since the 19th century. What united these disparate groups was an attraction to industrial policy, less so some immigrant axis.

Your article #3 is not about the US but rather Europe, your articles #2 and #4 (especially #4) explicitly disagree with you about immigration being the driving factor, and your first article indicates that it has more to do with industrial policy than immigration.
I've read the 5 stages of climate denial as:

1. It's not happening
2. It's not our fault
3. It's not that bad
4. We can't solve it
5. It's too late

So in that framing we're on step 4 or 5 I think.
Linguistically, "might" could also mean "will under certain circumstances". It doesn't definitively imply they don't know.

I myself have used "might" when speaking to customers when the criteria by which we would differentiate is something that isn't necessarily accessible to the audience.
This video is pure joy.
> "But depth info is...one of the easiest [problems]" ... "are they safer than human drivers?" ... Semantic evasion.

It looks like you're jumping from "depth is easy with cameras" (demonstrated false) to "safer than humans anyway without it" (speculative and not demonstrated by anyone), so who here is evading? That they're safer is not demonstrated. That depth is easy with just cameras is demonstrated to be false by the continuing failures in the presence of extreme financial incentive to not have those failures.

> You agree that it's "not a problem solved by LIDAR", right? It needs a camera. You can use a LIDAR output as a (somewhat inferior) camera, but it's not providing any advantages.

The LIDAR addresses the part where all current cameras are unsuited to mapping physical world geometry under driving conditions. It's not one or the other, but you appear to be assuming an imaginary not-the-one-we-live-in reality where only one is needed because you assume that all available cameras aren't actually very bad. But they are all actually very bad. So we continue to need both for the indeterminate future until someone invents mechanically robust extreme fidelity stereoptic cameras with motion freedom independent from the vehicle body, which is what humans use.

Humans are unsafe predominantly because of inattention, not ability. Camera-only vehicles are unsafe because of camera ability before you even get to the attention part.

Tesla's repeated failures over the years (and your conviction toward what Tesla is doing regardless) demonstrate a dangerously erroneous belief that object identification is the first and most important step for path planning. But that's not how humans drive, and it's not how to drive safely. The vehicle should avoid driving into any space that isn't going to be open smooth road, period, so the most important step is mapping geometry. There are no cameras currently suited for that. This is not a theoretical limitation. Just a practical one. Becoming suitable with current cameras would require many more cameras with much more processing per frame, so if you're trying to save costs vs lidar, you won't.
> I think the truth may be that mobile carriers, much like ISP's, are a complete crapshoot, and reliability/service may entirely depend on which market you're in.

The customer service is always a crapshoot, which is why I do my best to avoid dealing with them, which is why I never go to a store (whether it be ATT/T-Mobile/Verizon).

I just paid full price for an iPhone at the Apple Store, took it to a T-Mobile store to add to my mom’s T-Mobile plan. Next month, my mom ended up being charged a monthly fee for the iPhone itself, as if she had bought it on contract from T-Mobile. Had to tell T-Mobile they would have to prove in court that they sold my mom the iphone, and we had a receipt from Apple showing the serial number.
> what's the alternative?

Don't have women on submarines. I mean, that's the alternative whether it's palatable (for any number of reasons) or not. And, as someone in favor of having mixed teams in general, it's admittedly difficult for me to imagine the warfighting advantage of a mixed submarine crew.

Anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare, reconnaissance, special operations support, land attack, and nuclear deterrence don't seem to have any particular characteristics where the presence of women on the crew would be advantageous. This is in contrast with something like civil affairs or certain types of special operations, where women bring new capabilities to the table. That said, the berthing in new boats is designed around mixed crews so clearly the horse left the barn a while ago, so it's beyond time to figure out how to make it work.
Setting aside the type-in aspect, the idea of having a separate book (or other media) closely integrated with a game is interesting. I'm not sure how much sense it makes nowadays, since you can easily have a PDF/movie/etc on the computer as well, and once you're doing that you might as well integrate it fully into the game. Shenzhen I/O did something like this; it came with a list of datasheets for the electronic components you used in the game, and the devs recommended printing them out and putting them in a binder for added immersion. Some of the other Zachtronics games might have done something similar, I'm not sure.