skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Microsoft also acted like Win10 would be the last one, and here we are with Windows 11. I doubt anyone gave a damn about that. Normies don't have values when faced with not getting their shiny.

What should be more damning, IMO, is that there are barely any grassroots or community members on WHATWG, who has acted like they are more important than W3C. Both have drafted and approved of things that have damaged the Web. I am looking forward to the inevitable protocol split between "linkable documents" and "apps in a common virtual machine". The complexity desired from web app authors is directly opposed to the sort of things that plain HTML and CSS were doing 15-20 years ago.

It'd be nice if Google and friends just worked on the app side of things, on their own protocol, instead of commandeering the Web.
Note Britain is the third-largest contributor to the European Space Agency, and has a fairly large space industry (satellites, instruments etc).

(The Beagle 2 lander which crashed into Mars in 2004 was managed from Britain.)
Yes and no.

On an absolute dollar value you are correct and I agree with you. But our Ukrainian allies are not in an absolute dollar situation.

Ukraine is aiming at atrophy warfare, trying to outlast Russian production and force them into running out of supplies.

Every extra weapon the Russians can build is another weapon that extends the current stalemate.

The battlefield reality is not measured in dollars, but in blood and bullets.

--------

My perspective is that these smallest and cheapest of chips (ADC, filters, and regulators) are obviously essential components to the Russian war machine.

But I do acknowledge the reality that these chips are small, easy to hide, cheap and difficult to regulate.
I gave an honest floor salary to a company prior to interviewing. Their offer was 20% less than my floor. I think they thought it was my "best case" number despite very clear communication that it was my minimum to consider leaving my current role.

I walked away vaguely annoyed with the hiring company.
> At the risk of being slightly off-topic, what are good sources to find out wether and in which conditions building your own house is financially advantageous vs buying an existing (new or old) house.

I'd imagine only if you do a lot of the actual building yourself.

New house will just cost same or less than you trying to get a project then hire people to do it.

Project is tiny part of the cost, but for developer it's already amortized over tens of homes they've built. Workers also "know the process" and I'd imagine build it faster than some custom.

Now old house, that's interesting question, and that will heavily depend on state the house is in.

Putting some insulation on old house and doing some renovation might come out far cheaper.

Or you might get into some kind of renovation hell where every fix uncovers another problem with the house, then it turns out you not only need to re-do electrics but also water/sewage, or remove old insulation and replace it with better, or remove some rotting boards etc.

Then there is of course question about whether you like house layout or not or how much you'd want to change it.

On flip-side, the advantage of fixing up old house is that you don't need to do it all at once and so can take smaller mortgage and so pay less in cost of that.
what's your cms ?
Russian Wagner chief Prigozhin listed on board plane that crashed in Moscow
The only thing worse than Zigs immature compiler is the
immature community.
Slightly meta (relating to the website) and not this specific article, I got a popup toast saying

> Secret Zebra just left feedback for their FAANG interviewer:
I really enjoyed the interview, you did really well in giving me the right level of assistance to keep under the time constraints. It was also pretty useful that you had prepared some extra code for testing.

Apart from such toasts being unusual, I doubted that a review would be "just" left by someone. Googling the text brought me to https://interviewing.io/mocks/Reverse-Nodes-in-k-Group, which as per archive.org was at least as old as 2 June 2023[1]. Not terribly old, but feels scummy to be honest.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20230602224912/https://int
None of this changes simply by moving rendering to the client, and none of these changes would require a client-rendered site.
information wants to be free
> Preparation and leverage means doing the work to make sure that you have multiple offers, that all your offers come in at the same time, and that you don’t tip your hand too early. Laying this foundation is 80% of the work. You’ll need to slow some companies down, speed some companies up, and hold off questions from recruiters until you’re ready to negotiate, and not before.

Laying this foundation is largely unachievable for people who are not full-time job seeking.

Even when you're doing nothing but applying and have a decently impressive combination of skills and experience, it can be quite difficult in certain environments to get a single offer, let alone multiple offers, let alone multiple offers coming in at the same time.

But if you're currently holding down a full-time job and are looking to make a move into a new role, the odds of everything lining up perfectly like this are going to be so low as to be unrealistic even for very talented people.
Yes, unfortunately. It’s not like these people were hiking in the wilderness and might be found alive. They’re buried in the ashes of the fire.
Client side rendering are sure pain in the abdomen, but they require good MVC separation, and that's nice comparing to big ball of mud which people often create on SSR
I get that most of these are hilarious (this is my favorite comment on HN in some time, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37239909 ). But still, I find this incredibly frightening. These are only going to get better. Does anyone doubt that in a couple years time (if that) we'll be able to put the image of any known public person into whatever generated photo we want, which would be indistinguishable from reality? We're not that far already (see the Pope in a puffy jacket).

My only hope is that this extreme enshittification of online images will make people completely lose trust in anything they see online, to the point where we actually start spending time outside again.
Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.[1]

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
“Python Calculations Run on Microsoft Cloud” for Excel
This seems to be a matter of the above source reporting a variation of the algorithm that is asymptotically slower than the algorithm given in the paper *and* uses asymptotically more memory. Thanks for posting the paper!
A female journalist who helped create the field of science reporting
There's other ways to avoid becoming a burden, but yes that would be worth planning for.
This adds two things over the OP's initial version, both mentioned in the post: wheel factorization (with 30), and the "linear probing" to avoid lists. It's possible to keep improving (up to a point) by using e.g. wheel with 210 instead of 30, and so on, if one doesn't mind hard-coding more and more.
An iceberg head is much like a cabbage head: pull off the outer leaves and you've removed the dirt.
I sadly just found out about wellnessfx closing down. I ended up taking a Premium test today way earlier than intended. This looks great. I'll try it out once my recent test results come in.

They don't even seem to be transferring over broad test products to Thorne which is silly. Its boggling to me that they aren't transferring test data over to their Thorne platform either.

Owning your own data is the way.

It'd be amazing to be-able to input individual fields from non wellnessfx related blood tests and see them in this tool
I very much hope that important companies by and large won’t adopt GPT into their core functions.
Anyone else get endless captchas these days with archive.is? Tried several browsers including no adblocking and such to no avail.
You'll still be glad you asked up front, because that kind of BS tells you something about the company. Sure you wasted your time in the interviews, but you now know not to push back on their initial offer because you don't want to work for a company that'd pull that on you.
Obvious chatgpt
"teen" is a ubiquitous porn category that, in practice, describes a body type, not age; similar to how "babe" almost never means "infant".

I would be more surprised to get SFW results from that prompt, considering the result would be based on more heavily regulated (less common) photographs of minors.
I really don't think the poor are getting poorer. Would you rather be poor today, poor 50 years ago, or poor 100 years ago? I would choose today. Because a capitalist society facilitates investment into new technologies, whose prices tend to fall dramatically over time, thus becoming available to all, and improving the lives of all. You can be poor today, and still own a smartphone, a laptop, a TV, internet, a home with central air and heating, a car, and even get healthcare.

If we're focus our perspectives on the gap between rich and poor, there's reason to be upset. But why should that gap matter for any of us in our own personal lives? Jeff Bezos owning a yacht and a mansion doesn't make me any less happy about my car and my apartment.
>Reddit put walls up for the same reason, though as usual they lied about why they were making reddit worse.

So it was just a convenient side effect that it killed off all the good third party apps to push people towards their app.
If you're looking for wasteful effort to direct elsewhere, I suggest reducing the money spent on social media, advertising, sport, movies and so on before space exploration.
> Was there not just precedent set for this?

No, there was a recent case where someone tried to claim an AI as an author for copyright and themselves as owner via work for hire, where it was ruled invalid because AI can’t be an author under copyright law; the ruling was explicit that it was not addressing copyrightability by humans of images they create using an AI generator as a tool, only the claim of copyright with AI as the author.
Not always.

SSR that needs to run JavaScript hydration needs to download more content (the html and js bundle) than a spa before it’s interactive.

I don’t know why the community collectively decided that first-contentful-paint is a more important metric than time-to-interactive. Seeing a page quickly and waiting a noticeable amount of time for it be functional seems like the worst possible ux, especially when there is no signal to the user when the JS has loaded.
> but you cannot ever justify it as logically consistent

I don't understand where "justify" came from. It WAS logically consistent. But that's 100% irrelevant. Logic based on faulty assumptions is worthless, this is just "garbage in, garbage out". There is absolutely no morals to be had from garbage assumptions.

> Genocide is always wrong.

I don't think that's correct. Now, it has always been wrong HISTORICALLY, but saying that it is logically impossible to even imagine a science fiction scenario where it's the lesser evil just means you have a lack of imagination.

> but genocide is definitely always wrong, and we can say that he was a morally broken person because of it.

Again I disagree. The immorality of genocide flows downstream from my morals, it's not an axiom. I don't like the long-list-of-axioms family of morality. It doesn't scale, and it can't handle future situations. We need something much more stable than a long list of past mistakes. We need to understand what caused those mistakes, but even more important we need clear and practical rules about how to avoid that entire class of mistakes, including future similar mistakes that we have not made yet.
Another member of the intergovernmental agency domain squatters club.
Uh.

It was probably the uh. I don't fault you for thinking it might be something else.
I think the frustrating thing about this when people being up that "good artists steal", they don't really understand why artists are upset by this technology. Artists are happy to teach other people how to make art. They're generally fine with people looking at their work to develop their own skills because that's how the field sustains itself. Art is a skill and a culture. You become an artist by participating.

AI art systems are alienating in comparison. A group of people who are not artists basically showed up without talking to anyone and is trying to displace the original culture, by using work that they extracted from that culture. The entire attitude from the AI art community is hostile. "Why would you keep drawing now that we've automated it?" It's a gross viewpoint that devalues an entire cultural enterprise and a major portion of human experience.
For SSDs I'm not sure. My data drives, SSDs are still too expensive so I haven't switched. Spinning rust it definitely does matter (for drive lifetime and also contention).
Agreed, Russia shouldn't get a pass just because "space" given all the ways they have shown total disregard for everyone else.

Their war set back many international cooperations, they've destroyed Ukraine’s space industry, they stole satellites, launches for which had been paid for, only to turn around and put absurd conditions to launch them, and under Rogozin they showed blatant disregard for NASAs attempts to keep the ISS cooperation neutral.
It also leads to disorganization. Imagine everyone cutting around each other and end up blocking the road. Instead of keeping order everyone slowly exiting, a few cutting ahead could cost many others dearly.
Please indicate where I suggested as such.
It could (in theory) be self hosted, but at that point screenshots are way easier to integrate with the only upsides being accessibility (which can be negated with an alt text), linking to the original Tweet (can also be fixed by making the screenshot a clickable link) and being able to copy the text.
Russian officials say Prigozhin was on passenger list of jet that crashed
Have any of you guys actually read a whole novel that was written by AI?
Whether I am thrilled to take a $60k TC job or my absolute minimum is $400k that doesn't change the market in that 60k is insultingly low and 400k is well above the median (cue all the folks who think FAANG is the market chiming in about $450k TC juniors).
Neither do I, but within the scope that I have bills that need to be paid and thus need to work, there are organizations where that work is enjoyable, others where it's acceptable and even more where it would be unpleasant.

I want to not dread going to work, so I only entertain offers from outfits where the job and its environment appear enjoyable. "Acceptable" is below the bar I set unless I somehow end up desperate for money.

The attitude in my case wasn't cultivated. It stems from the fact that I like what I do and I'm very good at it.
I don't recall Apache ever segfaulting on me due to config error, and what's more it has an <If> construct that both works as expected and is well documented.
What a messy world we've built
Gasoline vapors are also heavier than air, and its lower explosive limit is only 1.4%. If my parked car leaks 10 gallons of gasoline is that really any different? Or are LPG tanks more prone to leaking? I would think not, because they are probably heavier steel not the 18 gauge sheet metal (or plastic) of an automobile gas tank. But if the rule is there, I guess it must be. Hard for me to see the rationale though.
Then you've mis-projected my point twice.

I'm not totally opposed to welfare benefits especially when it comes to food and housing. I'm not opposed to having healthy food as an option - in fact I would rather those foods be the only option. But crab legs at nearly $30/lbs is abusive compared to wild-caught salmon at half that price, or free range chicken at a third of that price.

Stop trolling for outrage.
It's a good idea (using real time search to supplement AI responses), but yeah, it's very much a PoC that they just went straight to prod with. It's not a usable product the way it is.
What I get from this is: make your own rules
We don't have to do things exactly the same way we always did and offices will change, my point is only that a lot of these types of articles are outright dismissive of regular, in person communication at all.
Finally a website that unprompted answers the question “What if Wednesday Addams had enormous breasts?”

Edit: lol
https://generated.photos/human-generator/64db2561ba3ed6000ca...
Elon Musk comes to mind
Let's imagine you need to read a certain story, but don't care to become a long-term subscriber. The $10 for a month option fits that use.
I'm a little sympathetic to the hiring company. Unless you really know the other negotiating party, it can be hard to guess when they're posturing.

(OTOH, maybe it's a mistake to low-ball a candidate by such a large percentage, regardless. It sounds like a recipe for a discontent employee.)
Did you study at the Haber Institute?
I meant like, even after toggling it off when you made noise or spoke, there was a visual representation/feedback for that shown in the wavy graph thing. Not just ambient/moving parts type noise. Just thought it was weird, never really thought about it too much.
There's literally nothing stopping the page from simply not encrypting the data.
In my experience hiring, we know the benchmark numbers for the roles. Because we have current employees in those roles and we want to understand whether we're paying them fairly. Not out of some kind of deep kindness, but because otherwise they'll at some point get a better offer and leave.

But it differs across the company where we aim to be. For some roles we aim for 50th percentile, while for other areas we deliberately pay 90th percentile and adjust current employee salaries yearly (after performance review) to match that. Because those areas are important to our strategy/roadmap.

May sound unfair to those that aren't in those areas. But this is business, we're spending our money where the returns are highest for this company. If a role isn't a 90th percentile role for us, it might be somewhere else, and we are willing to accept higher turnover on the 50th percentile roles to make money available to get the people we really need on those other roles.
I have never had issues with this approach. Yeah you'll get a few people who think they're being cute about wanting to schedule a call or whatever, but when it comes down to it "I don't move forward without knowing the budgeted range for a position" gets me a number probably 19 out of 20 times, almost always the first time too.
I'm wondering what the title tag of the image is referring to...
I just read the link you posted and people there seem to be worried about the introduced complexity.
I'm really not sure what the strongest possible interpretation of "lets go back to before the industrial revolution" is other than 90% of people being subsistence farmers on the verge of starving. People moved to cities because less agricultural labor was needed and people living close together makes them more productive.
my favorite coworker model. the friend who emphasizes that something is best because he uses it himself. yes my friend, SSR can even provide immortality.
I feel like it's not a great look to say "I don't know enough about the role to give you my salary expectations at this point" while also asking "but what is the salary range for this position, given you don't know enough about me".

Any thoughts on how to approach that?
The point is that your aspirational number may be way, way off. Not saying the aspirational number is how I got twice the salary I planned to ask for as a junior while interviewing for my first job years ago.
Okay, but as high-minded as this prose is, it ignores a pretty crucial thing - the only reason Wagner existed in the first place was to give some amount of plausible deniability between Russia and their foreign policy interventions. So countries like Germany could have a legal precedent to trade with Russia so long as all of the war crimes were technically off of the books.

So not only was this a huge miscalculation nationally that deeply embarrassed Putin, Wagner was supposed to look independent. So beseeching Putin for help only made it worse.

The irony is that Prigozhin probably thought he had leverage, but the only real thing of value to Moscow about Wagner's sad little army was the independence.
Beautiful

from collections import defaultdict

d = defaultdict(list)
for i in range(2, 10000):
for y in d.pop(i, [i]):
d[i + y].append(y)
for y in sorted(y for x in d.values() for y in x):
print(y)
Where are you located?

It's about 120 ms here (wifi off of gigabit fiber, east coast US.) Based on ping time, over 60% of that time is network latency to the west coast. Actual "processing" would be in the 50 ms range which is super fast.
>These are serious hallucinations and I am alarmed by how they are brushed aside. Most meditators think they are astral projecting. This is not examination or insight. This is delusional.

Do you dream at night? That is a hallucination. People can learn to be aware during dream states, this is called lucid dreaming. There is nothing delusional or dangerous about that, although the experience can be terrifying for people unfamiliar with the experience.

Out of body experiences are simply a special form of lucid dream, in which your imaginal / energy body seems to be located away from your physical body. There can be a sense of the imaginary body moving. This is just dreaming involving the proprioception sense.

The term "energy" can spook skeptics like yourself. The best explanations I have read is that it is just a mentally constructed sense of the body. Your brain right now has constructed an imaginary model of your body; this can also happen in dream states.

Your body is real, your mental map of the body is not. It is yet another form of hallucination which we all experience on a daily basis. Meditators will experience various forms of "energy" as their practice deepens, and this is also totally normal and not usually harmful.

Many of the explanations and mystical claims about energy and out of body experiences are questionable of course.

The mind is way more freaky and amazing than you realize, and labeling unusual states of consciousness as "delusional" is very limiting. It's your life...
I chose to make this as an extension so I could quickly inject data for unit tests and UI previews. I've thought to pulling out the code and making it a library as well, but Faker and chance already exist in the JS ecosystem.
There are clearer videos posted, some showing that it's missing a wing.
Where are you located? Are you willing to relocate if it's paid?
So perhaps we need to require that commercial models trained on public data be also made public?
Indeed, there's a balance. If you are in an orderly line to die like a lemming running off a cliff, you should second guess your choices.
It was unimaginable to me that Putin could let Prigozhin live after what he did. Brace for the conspiracy theories though that he faked his own death.
Well, you gotta compare the cost-per-kilo of setting up a coffee grounds collection program that gathers X% of the 30+ billion ton/yr of concrete that is used each year.

If the regulations are not properly written, they could be an incentive to start cutting down trees to turn to charcoal as a carbon filler. Companies are sometimes heartless like that.