skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How not? Russia has been launching payloads even throughout the war (30 or so in 2023 - including unspecified military systems).

They until recently sold around 100 RD-180 rockets to the US - none of which experienced issues. Not to mention putting US astronauts into space.

Russia is one of the few nations that actually have the history, engineering talent, finances and the raw resources to compete.
I think autotune was saying that software often does shortcut hacks violating some of those principles as an optimization. This can be a topic for research into the tradeoffs (e.g., CAP theorem), but may be more common in non-research-based implementations (e.g., NoSQL databases because ACID is slow/constraining/etc.)
I live in Quebec. It's all for show to prop Quebec up as a place to even do business in.

There's nothing in the tech space that is worth even looking at twice in this province that isn't headquartered elsewhere. Most larger companies open up here just to tap into the potential talent that don't want to leave their home province and a lot of companies aren't willing to put in the effort of dealing with Quebec being the exception to everything.

If you want to understand Quebec it really boils down to three points:

- Protect French language
- Protect culture
- Have more children. This achieves 1 & 2 in a cycle.

Things that are going well for the province, cheaper car insurance, cheaper housing, cheaper electricity, and subsidize daycare. Oh! This all ties back into our 3 rules.

All these advantages come at the cost of higher taxes, but that is apart of the strategy. Don't build wealth, but just provide enough for hope, dreams of having a family and rope as many into this to fulfil the 3 points.
I'm kind of surprised, it was and still is a very car-centric city. The very centre can be busy but these days, with a smart phone you could easily find parking within 500m or so.
This is really interesting perspective -- thanks for sharing it. I think there's something to the idea that some fields are more 'binary' than others -- that if you can't make it past some threshold of _true understanding_ that you will be denied experiences that could push that threshold further. Such a field would warrant a different strategy for learning / mastery than a less binary field.

I'm going to ruminate on this.
Yes - hence the more interesting qualifier "living"
What I'm objecting to is people theorizing in a vacuum about subjects that have been heavily theorized about, as if by starting over and disregarding all prior work, someone somehow stands a better, not worse chance of getting it right.

Start from where we are on these topics, which is definitely not nowhere.
It is upsetting to me but you are right, they'd know Dyson. (I wish they would instead know the name Chris Duncan, the inventor of the Henry vacuum cleaner and while still a Brexiteer, a man who hasn't subsequently kicked dirt in the eye of the UK).

They wouldn't remember Tim Berners-Lee's actual name but they would be able to say, the web guy. (Which is probably better for him when he goes shopping).
By the time any of this hits a reasonable scale we'll be past a reasonable CO2 level in the atmosphere. The best thing to do may well be to use it as plastic feedstock and just chuck it into landfill.
Yes to 1) and 2), however:

> 3. The acceleration is actually slowing down, but it is not heading towards zero. It is approaching some steady state acceleration.

No. The scale factor in LCDM (the current concordance model) is proportional to sinh^(2/3)(t/t_Lambda), which means it's asymptotically exponential. Acceleration will always increase.

(Edit: The expansion rate, so a'/a, will go to a constant value, though.)

Caveat: If the Hubble tension proves real, LCDM is wrong.
Sounds like a nice idea for an app that just gets your contacts and makes the links nicely, like a whatsapp wrapper lmao
A promotion system is important? Yes

But ranking and PIP? I assure you you are not incentivizing collaboration. You can try to force collaboration but most employees will do just enough because it is in their best interest if someone else fails.

If there were a system design interview where you had to design a system in which employees throw others under the bus - but subtly - what would you design?
CounterCloud – AI powered disinformation experiment [video]
> Marketing: KPI: understand the message to the market - KPI: understand how competitors are marketing their k8s offering - KPI: understand how to advertise new offering - etc

These are objectives, not performance indicators. Please do not redefine KPI to roughly have the same precision as "cloud" or "engagement".
That's kind of like suggesting wilderness hiking instead of urban sightseeing. I've traveled/toured NL by train and by car. Different countries entirely.

But yeah... In some cities, your best plan is probably to park at the hotel (perhaps on the outskirts) and use trains.
Again, these are just empty objections.
Angara, Amur, Soyuz-5, Soyuz-7 are all in the works.

Angara and Soyuz-5 are designed to be reusable to some extent.
What resources, exactly? The moon is a shit place to go for basically anything. We’d be much better off trying for near earth asteroids.

And no, a lunar base is not a good launching spot to get to other places in the solar system. You’re much better off with large orbital bases for that so you don’t have to waste reaction mass getting to and from the surface of a heavy body without atmosphere.
Elizabeth was never Empress of India, not least because India became a republic in 1950, two years before her accession.
what if a user copied a line from AP on a reddit comment and some LLM trained on it.
As I wrote:

> so you can get married in Denmark, which is an easy affair and doesn’t take much

Denmark has next to no requirements for the marriage, they even advertise easy marriages. Germany has … a lot ;)
>If it can make the $100 month back I would be really happy because I could still runs the website and show it to recruiter. It's my most successful project and I show it on my CV.

Assuming you're a dev and not a "business person," you can still run it and show it to a recruiter even if you don't make money off it. I've shown websites and projects that don't make any money during interviews.
No one deeply discharges a UPS system on any regular basis.
Hitler's and the Nazi's vision were very far from anything utopian (in the sense of eutopian) any such outcome would have been accidental.
What’s the rate on the note? US treasuries are paying 5+%. Unless there’s some bonus exercise rights for the conversion, this must add some significant credit risk premium.
There’s no such place: https://skyandtelescope.org/sky-and-telescope-magazine/peaks...

The longest lit places we know of are lit ~94% of the year but then experience even longer periods of deep freeze. They also don’t get much sunlight, and having a base there would create a long shadow. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S00191035100013...

Multi month moon bases could be an intermediary before going to the moon, but those spots still get really cold.
Philosophical inquiry into these problems goes back thousands of years.
It's because I am not waiting for the status of the request.
However, I don't udnerstand what this error is, it's a simple NextJS app.
I love AutoHotkey, but it doesn't pass security scans at my place of work. is there an alternative for running macro scripts?
Unrelated, but this is the first time I've seen the *.onl TLD.
Ah right. I had seen that PDP legacy aspect before but totally forgot. I had a 75300 series account via my dad's work which for the most part was amazing as it was a sysop level account (and free!). The one downside to teenage me was that you couldn't access any of the extra cost bits, like most of the games.
this is done by auditions in the code and all the steps from compilation to vote consolidation, the code review start years in advance of the election.

The code is made available to all political parties and several third-party organizations for review and auditing, this including several international auditors.

The parties and auditors also monitor all steps of the process from the compilation process, to the loading of the memory cards that will be inserted in the machines with the code, the joining of card and machine that will be sealed, transpoprt of the machines, transport of the memory cards for vote consolidation and the vote consolidation process.

the machine also print a receipt with that machine results, a copy of that can be requested by any person, this can then be used to validated with the post consolidation to ensure what was consolidate and what was in the machine match.

The election process in Brasil does not rely only in the electronic side, there are several processes in place to ensure fraud does not happen and each step is monitored and audited.
JetBrains earns my respect by letting you actually purchase the application, and still download it 5 years later.

I have purchased updates to IntelliJ, but it is good to know that I don't have to, and my access won't be restricted.
My best workstation runs Linux for work, so I've spent time getting 'odd' setups like Centos 7 to work before there were nice packages for it. Learned a bit trying to game on my good video card without booting to Windows. Fast forward to current, and I don't even bother with a Windows partition on it.

Today, Ubuntu sorts the drivers and steam setup just lovely. I've gifted out old workstations to extended family and they are pretty happy with what they can do from a gaming/browsing perspective. With Windows 11 not able to support these boxes, having something 'just work' gives these older boxes an extended life. Most have not needed to pick up a Windows license. Very much at that 'good enough' state.
Is any adblocker perfect? The default setting in Brave is not the highest setting you can set it to.

As to your question: it depends on why they are jumping. If it is because a giant truck is going to run over us, I might join them, yes.
> The question isn't about power lines. The question you started with is "Hydroelectric is generally counted as a renewable, and it's also a storage system."

Needless pedantry as everyone uses transmission lines so that power creation and storage aren't in the same physical location as the end use.

If you've got a 5 GW line going from Berlin to, say, the Czech border (where there's currently already a 1 GW hydro plant, I make no claims about environmental capacity for more even though it seems plausible at first glance), then you've got hydro storage keeping the lights on in the city even though it's 215 km away because there's nowhere here to put any hydro storage.

That's why it matters what the amp-acity of a HV line is.
We would have God-level control over the environment and mind of a simulated individual. There would be no need for torture to make them work.
The distinction between mysticism and sane rational stuff is only clear in hindsight. There was no obvious intrinsic difference and indeed many contemporaries of Newton disliked the postulation of a seemingly mysterious universal force (gravity) that can influence objects across astronomical scales. While popular conception often equates Newton's ideas with the mechanistic "clockwork" view of the universe, gravity was in fact considered the opposite at the time. The more grounded and "sane" people wanted a "billiard ball" physicics where things interact more straightforwardly than gravity looked like.

It's very hard to put ourselves in the shoes of those living in previous eras. If you think you can easily do it you most likely are missing something. Most scientists did stuff that is now considered a bit wacky. Mathematicians were deeply concerned about the theological implications of their work and indeed a lot of the motivation to do it came from a similar place in the first place.

This is not an endorsement to believe any old nonsense. It is just that it's naive to think you could have prevented those detours. If you really think you could have just told Newton which parts are same and which parts are woo, based on some obvious first principles, you probably overestimate yourself. The reason we know that science works is by knowing what didn't work. If the scientific method and empiricism, model building etc was so straightforward, you bet that many smart people would have come up with it earlier. Whenever you actually look at real history, you will see that it's not some stupid superstitious people holding back the enlightened sane and rational scientists. It's humanity grappling with figuring things out, without answers handed down to them from anywhere. It's very easy to look down on quackery today that we have Wikipedia, textbooks, pop science, etc. But when you need to figure stuff out from nowhere it's much murkier.
People will find ways to game any system to maximize their score for what is being measured, particularly when there are attractive rewards for high scores.

This leads to perverse incentives where what the organization's leadership really wanted is set aside in favor of maximizing scores by whatever means necessary:

https://courses.cs.duke.edu/fall01/cps108/code/jpixmap/image...
How about going into something education related? Not necessarily to go to work in school or at university but to teach/coach someone.
Understanding the Mechanical Watch
I've been selfhosting a dendrite matrix instance for about a year now. I'm only in a few public channels of a few hundred users, but also #matrix:matrix.org which has 44000 users and it hardly uses any resources.

I have no experience with Synapse which was apparently quite the hog as far as I know, but Dendrite is quite lean it seems
> Those that keep trying to make a point of Android being UNIX, never really shipped anything on the Play Store.

most people never ever even ship anything that is actually dependent on having any kind of unix underneath.
I just did add something. An objection to the prevailing method on HN of ignoring all the prior work on consciousness.
Thanks for that, I’m going to use it anytime someone asks me what prompt engineering is!
> They have presumably applied for a patent for it

They have one in this space: "Methods and devices using tri-transition metal phosphides for efficient electrocatalytic reactions" at https://patents.google.com/patent/US20220154354A1/en with abstract:

] Methods and devices for generating hydrogen gas with an electrocatalytic energy conversion cell by introducing a tri-transition metal phosphide catalyst at or on an electrode of the electrocatalytic energy conversion cell. The electrocatalytic energy conversion cell includes a first electrode including a tri-transition metal phosphide catalyst, such as MO3P, a second electrode of an anodic material, an electrolyte disposed between the first electrode and the second electrode, and an electric potential source connected to both electrodes. Oxidation and reduction reactions, such as hydrogen evolution reactions, occur at the first electrode.

(Google Patents says "M03P", the PDF says "MO3P" in the abstract, but the text clearly has "Mo3P".)

Even if this isn't exactly the technology discussed - Supplementary Figure 20 shows how ImF-Mo3P catalyst improves on "pristine Mo3P nanoparticles" - the authors have several other related patents, so I have no doubt a patent was filed for this technology as well.
It’s less the denial, time it takes, it’s more that Germany requires a lot more documents. My favorite is still "Befreiung von der Beibringung
des Ehefähigkeitszeugnisses" (Exemption from providing the certificate of marriageability) just because it’s such a mouthful and sounds crazy ;)

We could have gotten married with her here on a normal tourist visa, that wouldn’t have been an issue. But we didn’t want her to have to go back to change visas afterward, so we got married with a marriage visa (which converts to a spousal visa automatically)
I'm not sure why, but the .uk domain was the cheapest option on Cloudflare when I bought a couple domains a few months ago. They were $4.30 per year, so I bought several years of two domains since they were so cheap. I don't live in the UK, but it seems like a no-brainer because it feels like that TLD wouldn't get rejected as a spam domain like the other cheap ones might.
IPv6 proxy for GitHub using Nginx
Prompts use text, period. We already have the technology to search text for child pornography, both google and duck duck go use this.

there’s also negative prompting, which tells the model don’t do these things.

hallucinations can still happen but it’s much easier than you’re making it out to be.
> they don't exactly shit talk their users like other parts of the industry

Sweeney is legendary in doing this. Unfortunately with the Twitter debacle it's pretty much impossible to pull out all his comments.
This looks like a review or comment on something, that Ellen wrote, but I've no idea what, it does not link to anything ?
Octavo has matured their STM32MP1 SIP.

https://octavosystems.com/octavo_products/osd32mp15x/

I've been using their AM335X SIP for a while now and it's really nice. I'm starting to get away from the SOM mindset and making my designs smaller.
> Allocating capital takes a lot of work

How?
> Allocating capital takes a lot of work, and a lot of courage.

Less so when you've captured government and setting|opposing policy at Senate|POTUS level (in US, in a similar manner elsewhere) to worsen health insurance and housing access to your own benefit.

The Ruling Class S01E03 American Buyout did a tidy little episode on the downsides of The Blackstone Group.

https://www.mgmplus.com/series/the-ruling-class/watch/season...

I'm not anti-capitalist, but I am opposed to unregulated behemoths warping safeguards by the weight of their own capital and lobbying.
>> RISC-V is in the prospectus as a risk.

One option is to embrace it as an opportunity. ARM designs some pretty good CPU cores, so imagine they offered good RISC-V cores as well. RISC-V can be free, but a lot of companies still license core designs.
Radio: In Search of Lost Treasures
The Communist Party of China also owns 5-6% of Blackrock.
Cybersecurity: Do we need new laws?
Then it goes from begging a computer to do something to cursing the designers of the latest popular framework for doing The Thing in a Slightly Better But Radically Different Way. Oh great, we get to learn how to do this basic Thing for the eighth time, hopefully this time is sticks (it won't).
Oh the launch systems and landing systems are fine. I'm referring to plans on building a permanent moon base.
Imagination is all you need, I guess.
I've used some SBCs based on AM355X and it seems quite good but the custom kernels were quite a pain
> Quebec has had a few wins over the years with massive indirect subsidies toward strategic industries, notably gaming and AI

And aviation. The Bombardier C-Series is a very advanced plane, and the first modern plane developed outside of Boeing or Airbus (outside of the smaller regional Embraer). Sadly American protectionism was the final nail in the coffin for the programme, but Airbus is comitted to the Mirabel site and assembly line, so Quebec still is one of the top aviation hubs in the world.
The syntax was one of the main reasons I chose AutoIt. For some reason I cannot stand the AHK syntax. For me personally it is hard to bring structure to an AHK code.
then maybe formulate your comment better

because from what you posted above it clearly seemed you don't understand GDPR

people which don't know anything about the topic might come to believe that using CNAME is an actually legally working workaround instead of just a way to hinder ad-blockers
I often dream of buying a farm, but I'm certain I would be very bad at farming. I can barely grow a house plant
I imagine you apply this rule equally to "j-ph-eg" images?
Why keep stressing about wages being high? Do you people not understand basic inflation? At any point in time wages will always be highest they’ve ever been. In many places in the US, three years ago $100 bought you a week’s worth of food. Now it buys you a day’s worth. Maybe two.

Even in poor countries food has 3x in prices in two years.

Jobs are high because everyone has to work, wife, husband, even children in some cases, and many people take two jobs. While more and more don’t ever register at the bureau so they fall off the system. That’s your utopia?
The slowing down is speeding up. What could be simpler?
The Moon is very near and it's still possible to have near real time communication with it.

Going to the Moon helps learning about and solving many problems that will help on Mars for much cheaper and without incurring months and months of space travel.

Show me people living on the Moon permanently then we can discuss trying that on Mars. Otherwise it is indeed just for the show like the Moon landings.
People didn’t get your joke, but I think it’s very funny.
Not really, which is why I clicked to confirm.

When you have someone saying that everybody has a certain problem, the problem is usually them.
Nice picts and walkthrough [0] of the NS Savannah, "the world's first, and only, nuclear-powered cruise ship. The Savannah is the only nuclear-powered merchant ship the U.S. ever built, and the only nuclear vessel in the world designed with passengers in mind."

[0] https://www.npr.org/2023/06/23/1182973358/step-aboard-the-nu...
I don't think consciousness requires agency. Consciousness is simply the ability to have a qualitative experience. It does not require any intelligence or even self-awareness.
Completely agree those costs are insane. The US cranked out the currently functional reactors at a fraction of the cost. We have collectively offshored all knowledge and skill on massive building projects and have become weak at dedicating ourselves to tackling complex projects. I don't have a solution to the human problem of building these things, but it is a human problem, not a problem of the technology. I would not be surprised if it is eventually found that oil and gas secretly crippled the building of all modern reactors to keep people dependent. Though incompetence is probably a more likely answer.

We have a simple problem. Either we shift our power supply to something that won't kill us or we all start getting used to the idea of living on a hostile planet. I feel that this problem should be taken on as seriously as defending against a hostile nation and pour the resources of the state into a solution. Only when we rebuild our knowledge and skill can we tackle this.

I have some hopes in small reactors we could factory build and crank out of an assembly line. But I think the politics of this are still too difficult to even matter. People would rather throw their hands in the air giving up and die in a fire than have the risk of radiation in their neighborhood. Only the kids growing up today watching the world end will probably get their will together to change what is happening. We have failed them
This is why humanity is doomed haha. We just don't seem to learn from mistakes.

Imagine building beings and handing them power and control over important decision making processes. Then treating them as slaves. It's like begging for disaster.
Wow, I wish I had your ability to synthesise a thousand-year history in a few paragraphs in such an interesting and cohesive way!
The title of the book is the title of the article.

If you read the article, the author clearly states this is a review of the book.
Cannot say if useful, but if you need to insert/copy paste text (and modifiers) there is a tool written in AHK that is very handy:

https://lintalist.github.io/