skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As you hopefully know, the modern C# equivalent is not bad either, especially with top level statements and implicit global usings (The following is the whole program):

foreach (var i in Enumerable.Range(1,100))
{
Console.WriteLine(
(i%3==0,i%5==0) switch
{
(true, true) => "FizzBuzz",
(true, _) => "Fizz",
(_, true) => "Buzz",
(_, _) => $"{i}"
}
);
}

This is so much nicer than what was possible back when the linked question was asked.
If you want to sneak some buzzwords in, work Raft into the protocol so that one machine is serializing all of the transactions but you can replace it with another if it falls over.

Except someone wrote their own and it's buggy.
Something I find very annoying is apps with useful notifications that also prod you with basically ads to open the app. Like Okcupid is an app where I’d like to know if someone messages me but absolutely do not need the daily 6pm prompt that tells me “now is a great time to log on!”. Generally gives me a bad taste.
To answer your question on how to make lots of money mid-career, think about how you're scaling yourself. Are you an IT person supporting a 20-100 person team at a small company? You gotta learn how to scale your time and effort by impacting more than that. You'll have to impact more than 2 million people to get to 700k.
The UK government has definitely scrutinised/continues to scrutinise the deal quite closely
I learned that I can just add a picture in a PDF with libreoffice draw, which is a thing that cannot be done with pdf.js yet.
SEC–Ripple lawsuit cost XRP 3 years of adoption damage: Lawyer
ASL has some casual register signs that are simplified or single hand versions of complex signs [1] that only came about from people chatting more casually.
The original version goes from being the only word, to being the formal word for that idea.

I think humans just tend towards registers of communication, regardless of the medium.

[1] https://www.lifeprint.com/asl101/lessons/lesson27.htm
Wow, yeah let's build a tool for freeing storage on the device on the web. And even if it was a apk distributed by yourself, good luck doing that successfully.

How about instead we get a system that doesn't just flag livelihoods of other people with ML and if so, at least provides some meaningful way to appeal?
I can point out that as far as the result to our economy and health social media has been a dounle edged sword. I think people don't understand why you'd use and how to make it effective.
It's not literally that simple, yes, but the general idea holds. Storing nuclear waste is trivial compared to any real energy problem, so conveying that sentiment through a simple statement makes sense.
I’m curious how that is possible, considering that a fully maximal configuration of a Mac Pro (which including pre-installed FCP and Logic) costs less than $13k.
Or his steps to do science:

1. Guess
2. Compute consequences
3. Compare with experiment - if they disagree, the guess was wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL6-x0modwY
Thank you for this, I had no idea this was a thing. Out of curiosity how did you find out about this?
@bberenberg - you may be interested in https://sahha.ai/

They're building a developer API to measure wellness and mood without user input.

I'm considering maybe trying it in an app we're developing, but I have no affiliation with them (aside from being in the same part of the world Aus/Nz).
Yeah but willfully ignoring it kinda almost feels like having a modicum of control in your life.
At least in the US, it's very common to for major assets (especially real estate), owned by a trust.

Although a trust is different from a corporation in many ways, they're similar in that they are both legal entities distinct from the people involved (and can both have their own tax ID numbers, also distinct from those people). They're primarily created for estate planning purposes, but public records will typically show only the name of the trust, not the people who live there.
The article points out that if you erect steel tariffs, you impose costs on car companies. That's not complicated academic economics; it's common sense: you're making steel more expensive, and steel is a major input to car companies. You've read Ha-Joon Chang. Maybe you can teach us what he has to say about why this observation is wrong.
What's emotionally manipulative about "should"?

... what's degrading about green?
I remember this spat clearly.
At the time Kevin Lynch was Adobe’s CTO and came out with a pretty strong (and IMHO totally insufficient) rebuttal of this memo.
Fast forward 3 years and he jumped ship to join Apple’s on the Watch project, where he still holds a VP of Technology position.
I don’t know who, inside Adobe, was working as a fifth column for Apple, but they definitely made the Flash people realize they had to leave the ship to sink and move on.
It indicates that workers who excel at adapting to AI integrations which directly impact their work may have an opportunity to thrive. If AI could replace you wholesale, then it wouldn't matter how well you interoperated with it.
While useful, I think that emojis should not have been included in Unicode.

Unicode is supposed to be a universal standard, but the inclusion and exclusion of some emojis is an ideological issue. The inclusion and wide usage of emojis gives the Unicode consortium a disproportionate degree of influence over the way we communicate.
There would also be more wars. One of the big changes in the 20th century is that now every country is interdependent on every other, so going to war is even more costly for both sides, being cut off from half the world's supply chains.

If you draw a chart of percentage of all humans alive who die in war, there is a sudden dropoff around 1900.
This is akin to saying "The current generation who grew up with computers will be good at computers." Your statement is just as false as mine.

There is no subtitute for drawing a face to be good at drawing faces. No AI will ever help that.
A surprisingly large amount of people just don't believe the world looks this way, though. They are so wrapped up in some minute anecdotally supported factor (energy prices went up 20%! Inflation is running wild!) They don't recognise how well everything else is going.
This might not be good for RISC-V in the future.

If it becomes associated with Chinese computing, then it might face more sanctions and roadblocks in the US and Europe.
OpenSAFELY is a secure, open-source platform for analysis of health records data
Good lord, did you just casually drop an absolute goldmine of copy advice for me to implement? I might as well have spent weeks reading up on this and still came up with a lousy one.

It's people like you that make us peasants visit here on the regular. I'll implement the entirety of what you suggested. Thank you for this!
I was getting weird errors on Hulu from certain shows and figured out it was pi-hole. I have to disable it for 30 seconds, press play and hope it works, then it gets enabled again. Have to do it for the next episode. Not all shows require that though.
I didn’t say they aren’t considered being paid; I said that they’re speculative instruments in a way that a paycheck isn’t.

In other words: 700k is 700k when realized, but there’s no particular guarantee that so-and-so many units of stock are worth that much; it depends on the market. Comparing TC as if 700k is guaranteed is misleading.
> y. It's actually insane how well the US economy is doing.

The economy is doing insanely well while its people are doing insanely bad. The life has been dropping for two years in a row [1] and there were around 110k deaths of despair between February 2021 and February 2022 [2]. If those are the signs of an economy doing "insanely well" I dread to see what a recession will bring.

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2022/...

[2] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rising-physical-p...
I came here for Tensorflow.
Mhmm. Talking about pockets when smartwatches exist for this exact reason is so archaic.
I think I'd rather be perceived old than follow Gen Z's weird rules, if that article is to be believed. I will keep my slight smiley thank you very much
I agree. At the very least, it seems like he didn't communicate the "why". It certainly wasn't "to make as many tests as possible". I suspect the developers knew that, which is why is also a little unprofessional on their part to treat it like that was the goal.
I have to congratulate the author for getting an advert on the front page of HN.
I think that's a other huge reason to not let China into our kid's hands. If it was a country that is well known for building and maintaining diplomatic relationships that would be great.
lol. "Breaking change: all English text is rendered right to left now. In can be changed to bottom to top in the compile options. Left to right has been removed."
Penpot's CEO here. In terms of the knee jerk reaction, it's hard to say but we have the impression that there is some of it in terms of priorities, particularly long-awaited flex-layout-ish capabilities, for instance. Let's not forget that Penpot is an open source project that has been sharing its code and roadmap way before the Adobe/Figma deal.

Regarding the "isn't a realistic competitor" point. You bet we are! The only realistic competitor in a while, actually, because we come from a deep understanding of how cross-functional teams address design & code instead of doubling down on silos or "modes". To be successful you need to do things VERY differently.

- We're open source and we're enjoying an extremely active community of contributors.

- We rely on open standards so designers (and organisations) can own their future while developers can treat design files as first class citizens in a git repo if they want to.

- You can use SaaS or self-host, we don't care about your deployment strategy.

- We bring code vocabulary and abstractions to the design process (see Flex Layout or upcoming Grid Layout https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kx0ufKErqVk) so we get rid of the lost in translation issues that plague teams.

- We partner with people like Design Tokens (which are also open source) to build the future of Design Decisions so we can transcend the current status quo of design systems.

Yes, of course we have performance challenges with SVG on browsers (not Figma 2MB WASM memory limits, though, since we can access DOM memory availability which is now 16GB!) but these are temporary engineering challenges and we're working super hard on cracking them.

I'm fine having these debates on whether Penpot is a viable competitor to Figma, it's healthy and I get it, it happens all the time when new tools pop up (sometimes signalling the end of a cycle, even if it's not sudden). But what really matters to us at Penpot is that this goes beyond "competing" with a particular tool, this is about a specific world vision on how designers and developers want to collaborate to scale up design and software building.

And a key ingredient to all this is "what are developers going to do?" That's the real battleground out there. Developers outnumber Designers 10 to 1. People that keep wondering why Adobe paid $20B for Figma tend to miss the point. It's the developers, obviously! Of course they are worth $20B when you're not exciting to them!

This is not a static picture, it never was and it never is. Every single day we keep working hard on building the best design & prototyping tool for designers and developers, every single day we're re-balancing the status quo. It's already paying off with 400K+ users worldwide, half of them on self-host.

To be honest, we can't be more excited about everything that's going on and what's making everything worth it's not just the growing community of users and contributors but the amazing quality of it, these are not casual users coming for the free stuff, these are forward thinkers really getting it!
stories about six day work weeks, stories about one hour work days.

are those the same employees? are these two distinct groups?

> But much like in school, some might do better with this freedom than others. As Bloom explains, this new cadence “puts more pressure on our own self-control,” as some workers might benefit from flexibility and others might find themselves struggling.

are some not struggling due to others benefitting a bit too much from the flexibility?

what happens to an individual in burnout? longer hours “worked,” less work done.

the system is out of alignment.

shall we keep driving?
I'll stick to my Actor Model thanks. Akka (Scala) and Microsoft Orleans FTW.
for sure but going from 90% to 95% might be worth for some
Atheism isn't a solely Western thing.

Not all meditative traditions require belief in a God.

See Hindu atheism for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_atheism
> people who were perfectly comfortable having sat down to dinner [and] were not going to get up

That's me with the doorbell.
> people who haven't studied economics enough to conceive of second- and third-order policy effects.

The problem is the effects don't stop at 3rd order, where economic models stop, yielding the consensus that trade liberalization is always good. The reality is different:

her work showed that trade liberalization had slowed the rate of poverty reduction in rural India. - the linked article

" ... none of the world's most successful trading regions, including Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and now mainland China, reached their current status by adopting neoliberal trading rules." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage

It turns out that our evolved instincts can be better guides than simplified mathematical models.
Business doesn't work that way.

Every business I've ever worked for has figured out they have peanut butter down, and they have chocolate pretty well squared away, and wouldn't it be great if we made peanut butter cups? We have all the bits we just need to mash them together.

Business loves, loves, loves creating new features by combining existing ones. It's easier than actually inventing anything new. So whatever transactional boundaries you created two years ago? Those are creaking under the weight of feature factory work coming in from customers, business folks and the C-suite.
Have everyone set their phone in a big bowl by the door!
Will someone turn off the lights at OpenOffice? It's so sad.
Why spend on tech that might not be a sure thing when bribery has been working for decades?
Similar for my partner, though it was never a real emergency but rather things like asking what I should bring for dinner (they're particular about food): things that are useful for them as well as for me. I always had to wait for them to randomly look at their phone, which could be any time because nothing ever made any buzz or noise. (Conversely, they did call me a few times during what were actual emergencies for them, such as a car crash.) We had a conversation and they configured their phone differently ~3 years ago.

I asked them just now (look, OP, I talked to someone synchronously!) and they say it's "fine" - me: "just fine?" - them: "no it's good actually" and they'd set it up again if they had to re-make the choice. I am conscious of when I invoke the power, as with everyone, but still call somewhat regularly, so their positive rating is a good sign I suppose.

Have you brought this up with your partner?

Either way, yeah, this sort of thing is something you talk about only after you identify there is a problem. Ideally we'd have good defaults, and while I disagree with OP on their proposal for new defaults, their opinion is clearly borne from frustration. Perhaps phones should, when a contact calls you once while on silent, create a silent notification that asks "Allow <contact> to ring phone when calling twice within one minute?" with as buttons [No] [Buzz] and [Ring]
I was just about to write this. Emoji not only takes the place of body language and facial expressions over a textual medium, but gifs and other pictograms are a whole linguistic and almost hieroglyphic medium of shared cultural communication.
Just read the intro of https://semver.org/ once more, maybe you notice something?
> the outcome shouldn't be affected by the truth/falsehood of the statement in question

Epistemology would beg to differ. See, for example, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?" https://academic.oup.com/analysis/article-lookup/doi/10.1093...
"Pi4J OS is not yet another OS, but the official Raspberry Pi OS, with additional tools and preconfigurations to make it the ideal OS for any Java and JavaFX developer who wants to use a Raspberry Pi."
Not everyone is the same as you. I use it around the house.
I could swear I had seen this headline before, so much so that when I was recently asked to help out in some old vba code, I figured I’d port it over. Imagine my horror when I couldn’t find it. Imagine my horror seeing this now that I just finished.
No one wants simplicity
Does anyone know how qmail has fared since this PDF was written in 2007? Did it make it to 2023 without any bugs surfacing?
Business concerns change every month. Where is your architecture now?
'Brutal honesty' and 'not sugar coating the truth' are both lines used by emotionally immature people protecting their own values and ideals. Anything that needs to be said while being "brutally honest" can also be said honestly with compassion and empathy, but that takes a lot more self-awareness and emotional skill than just emotionally vomiting on someone else and calling it 'brutal honesty'.
> Your last paragraph has correct math. But the math works equally well with "specify a girl if you have one" or "flip a coin and use a random kids gender"

That’s the point.

The math works well with "specify a boy if you have one" and then the answer to A [I tell you I have two children and that (at least) one of them is a boy, and ask you what you think is the probability that I have one boy and one girl.] is 2/3 and the answer to B [I tell you I have two children and that (at least) one of them is a girl, and ask you what you think is the probability that I have one boy and one girl.] is 0.

The math works well with "specify a girl if you have one" and then the answer to A is 0 and the answer to B is 2/3.

The math works well with "flip a coin and use a random kids gender" and then the answer to A is 1/2 and the answer to B is 1/2.

If every parent with two kids says either “at least one is a boy” or “at least one is a girl” there is no way to make the math work so the answer to A is 2/3 and the answer to B is 2/3.

——-

As I explain in another comment for that the two following conditions need to be met:

P(you tell me that you have at least one boy | you have two boys) = P(you tell me that you have at least one boy | you have one boy and one girl)

P(you tell me that you have at least one girl | you have two girls) = P(you tell me that you have at least one girl | you have one boy and one girl)

There are ways to make the math “work”. For example: if you have two boys or two girls flip a coin and if you get heads talk about the weather, if you get tails say [I have two kids and at least one is a boy/girl], if you have one boy and one girl say [I have two kids and at least one is a …] using a coin flip to decide if you say “girl” or “boy”.

However, they seem quite unnatural and hardly a justification to claim that “any arguments for 1/2 are just wrong.”
Those "modes" are extremely frustrating and represent a silo-based conception of how teams work. If the tools creates disconnects... the team gets disconnected, that's not progress at all.
A business decision pretending to be a technology decision. In the end, there were just as many shitty Flash sites as there were shitty iOS apps.

The legacy of this choice turns out to be the beginning-of-the-end for the broad market in high(er)-end, custom website development and the move towards the walled gardens of app stores and social media giants.
This is a horrendously bad post, misleading all the way through.
The final reason stated is the only real reason why Apple blocked Flash: they didn’t want any cross-platform runtime when it became clear they were winning. They only grudgingly accepted HTML because it was unavoidable, but embarked on a deliberate program to limit Safari’s capabilities to hamper the web as a platform (just like Microsoft did with IE ten years earlier).

In the late 1990s Steve Jobs was a big fan of Cocoa-Java because he thought a cross-platform language and runtime could help adoption of his company’s middleware product. In 2010 he was very much against middleware and cross-platform runtimes. That’s how it goes. The thing you’re selling at that moment is always the right answer.
this idea is so tremendously disconnected from the actual force of movement every day that makes up the changing nation-states for the last three thousand years.. ending with a beneficial wish. it almost indicates a single brilliant mind is actually pretty-useless when it comes to daily practical trade.
SemVer is more useful in Apps if you use feeling vs strict rules. A massive UI overhaul (but without breaking features) is almost definitely a major version bump but SemVer says it's a significant minor jump (5.0->5.5), at best.

The problem is that SemVer was released for libraries, where it's rationale and rules make sense. But the abstract spirit of major.minor.patch makes more sense at an application level.
Do you both use iPhones? FaceTime Audio has helped me and my family with regard to crappy audio fidelity. I struggle with “normal” phone calls now, lol.
I weigh over 100kg and can trivially get my e-bike to 32km/h to 20mph pedaling on flat ground on the "standard" assist level. FWIW, I usually have it on the "eco" setting because I like getting a light workout.
"isn't just brainless amusement for inbred yokels"

The article never made reference to "inbred yokels". It didn't have to. It can couch its descriptions in the language of coastal elites who supposedly know more of wine and polo than they do of simple things like truck rallies. And while it's ostensibly explaining how "sophisticated" the sport is, the readers will fully understand the "isn't just brainless amusement for inbred yokels" part.

I wouldn't characterize my response as one of outrage. But I do find it off-putting and pretentious.
ElevenLabs' AI Voice Generator Can Now Fake Your Voice in 30 Languages
Yea, identifying isn't the hard part though - that's not what i'm concerned about. Automatic submission to parties, APIs for governments, jurisdiction, etc. Wonder what Google does if you type in CSAM triggers.

I suspect we could use some sort of central management service for "Internet Reports". Ie to deal with jurisdictions, reporting something to the right people, etc, as well as the complexities involved with identifying people.

Either way i think you're underselling the complexity. Or maybe you think it's so easy but no one cares, /shrug. Seems a long list of questions i'd have before i could even begin to implement it.
Wikipedia in itself is a miracle. People forgot how it was back then.
The title is a simple factual statement. I see no reason to presume the information is presented for “shock factor”.
"Stop tending someone else's garden" doesn't mean "build exactly what you were building before, but on the web". It means, stop adding value to Google's platform when they don't care about you, and start building something you control.

We have been hearing this exact story for well over a decade now. I have absolutely no time or sympathy for people who continue to tend Google's (or Apple's or Microsoft's or Slack's or Stripe's etc) garden and get bitten.
Do you know how much WATT Imperium costs? No information on their web site.

AFAIK both fuel cells like that, and the inverse carbon capture machines, are technically possible for decades now. The issue is high cost due to precious metals in the catalyst.

Apparently, these guys have solved the issue with much cheaper stuff for the catalyst, molybdenum phosphide.