skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For those wondering what this is referring to it's the use of ".int" for the TLD of the examples. ".test" and ".example" are the only really good reserved TLDs for this (".local" isn't quite what people think it is).
i am looking for Full Stack Web Development Role
Hello, my name is Ved Gupta. I am looking for full stack development roles. My skillset includes React, Next.js, Node.js, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, and other technologies needed for development and deployment of projects.

Please take a look at my GitHub profile at https://github.com/innovatorved/ .
If you have any opportunities, please email me at vedgupta@protonmail.com."
If it came up over the Lahaina Pali, I believe that. I've hiked it and the grasses are bone dry and the wind is constant and strong.
This take get touted out every time the IA CDL thing comes up, and it's baffling because it's flat out wrong. Many, many, laws get changed because someone brings it to court by breaking it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_disobedience

And it's not limited to civil disobedience. Hell, the single most touted decision in internet rhetoric, Citizens United, was based on an organization breaking the law.

There are many reasons the IA doing this was ill-advised, but "you can't change the law by breaking it" flat out isn't one.
BTW in California, left on red is legal when it's one-way to one-way. Most people don't realise it so I don't do it if there is any ped around.

Also no-stop right turns at red lights are made by putting a triangular island that forms a "protected" right lane. I put "protected" in quotes because it's protected in traffic engineer jargon but affords no protection to peds. Few pedestrians realise that the driver is not supposed to stop when making this turn, and that even when a crosswalk is marked there is no pedestrian signal. Super dangerous. With these it's often hard to even see a pedestrian even when you slow down.

Again, this is California; I don't know about anywhere else. CA has it's own traffic laws; for example I believe it's the only state in which it's legal to overtake on the right hand side (the equivalent is called "undertake" in the UK I believe).
https://github.com/innovatorved/
It makes no sense at all for the company or recruiter to hide the range for you. Because they would be wasting their timing doing all kinds of meetings if your expected number is far above that range.
> I’m something of a skeptic myself. I’m not convinced LLMs are as disruptive as the hype says. But they’re not nothing, and it’s still early.

As someone studying AI and ML: they never were, this was pure hype cycle mania to juice the numbers, be it from existing incumbents trying to prop their stock prices (FB/META) after the massive losses they took from meta-verse, to Open AI teaming up with M$ in a deal that honestly probably let them have a longer life than they would have otherwise as these numbers confirm.

LLM's were the panacea that was going to help the VC world out of a post-COVID slump where massive layoffs, massive losses, down-rounds and overall worker discontent have been the norm since the bubble burst as the cheap money and absurd valuations were destroyed.

This is something that needs to be understood, LLMs are just relying on a form of training (which is really to say surveillance) scraping the internet and is trying to predict the next series of words based on weights on which the algorithm it's operation on deems more successful than the rest--this explains why hallucinations sound so confidently wrong, because someone, somewhere made that same mistake and it was written to sound convincing enough until it was proven otherwise. And nothing more, it cannot reason, it cannot think, it cannot intuit.

I hope this dispels the BS Musk drama about it being the cause for mankind's downfall, when in reality its just statistics; and often made on not very good percentage of accuracy mind you.

This speech by Meredith from Signal [0] underscores what the the real harm AI can pose right now and doesn't rely on some conjecture that somehow goes from a hallucinating LLM to Skynet; the further I go further into my studies (2nd year student) I'm finding out that AI/ML is just as hype-prone as NFT/crypto scams I'm also realizing that maybe cyber-security is far more valuable to what my interests within AI are than I had initially thought and I will likely pivot after this semester.

The last part is so poignant and if people want to face some harsh truths then look no further as it really speaks to what make this all possible.

0: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ROlMFlbkWE
> First, TMS operates at frequencies of 1-10 Hz, so that's well below RF.

So? ELF communication systems have operated in that frequency range for decades [1]. Also, by "RF", I'm not referring specifically to ITU radio bands. I'm saying that the brain in general responds to radio waves in general, which is inclusive of the whole portion of the electromagnetic spectrum below 300 GHz. Perhaps a better characterization of the brain is "electromagnetic radiation (EMR) transceiver."

> Second, an RF transceiver is a device capable of sending and receiving a signal over RF, not just anything that emits RF or that is physically affected by RF. Otherwise a glass of water is an RF receiver, because when I put it in the microwave it heats up.

The very fact that functional brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been created demonstrates the brain is indeed a transceiver. According to a DARPA news release concerning a BCI: "By enabling two-way communication between brain and machine—outgoing signals for movement and inbound signals for sensation—the technology could ultimately support new ways for people to engage with each other and with the world" [2]. These signals are electromagnetic in nature. Given that non-invasive TMS EMR is received by the brain in specific and targeted ways [4], and given that non-invasive skull caps receive electromagnetic transmissions from the brain (though I recognize you may object to such a characterization) [3], brains are certainly able to receive and send "radio waves."

A glass of water by itself is obviously not an RF receiver.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_low_frequency

[2] https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2016-10-13

[3] https://brainvision.com/products/braincap-mr/

[4] https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv107
A simple and opinionated modal code editor for your terminal
They're not charging for the model, they're charging for the UI.
I'll grant you, "enjoying work" is rarely, if ever, a thing. The choice might come down to "less bad", but there's still a range of work situations. By "companies you'd like to work with" I mean companies shipping products or services that resonate with you, using tech your interested in, and development processes you don't hate. I don't like working in fintech, for example, so that's a place I wouldn't interview unless I was in need of money. Others might really love the idea of working as staff at academic institutions, and be will to accept less money in exchange for other things.
or, The C Bible
You say that if someone has the chops to be a real mathlete they won't need Polya's _How To Solve It_

I'll say I went to college 25 years ago with people who had competed internationally in high school and who placed competitively on the Putnam, and they LOVED Polya's book.

I think whether you enjoy seeing strategies laid out well--—whether or not you've been able to figure some of it out yourself---depsnds more on your personality than on how good you are at solving creative math problems.
If anybody has the magic formula for pricing, I'd be all ears. Yeah, $100 a year seems steep - but OTOH are twice as many people going to subscribe for $50? Five times as many for $20? (Or more...)

I don't know what the answer / formula is, but I pay more than that per year for my LWN.net subscription and for a few other publications. Less than that for others, but I really don't know what the "right" level would be to maximize revenue so they're able to pay themselves a decent salary and keep the lights on.
McNealy was also a member of the 1776 Commission, and held a fundraiser for Trump at his mansion.
Also, if you sell and rent, your housing payment is no longer locked in. You will be exposed to annual rent increases, likely exceeding any annual wage/earned income cost of living bump. As you mention, new construction is the best deal for folks, as those builders have to move units to remain in business.
> when they do it was because it was really worth it to them

But this is totally unrelated to why the thing was banned in the first place. We don't ban things out of a moral concern that the perpetrators haven't fully considered their lives and decided what's really important to them, we ban things because we don't want them to happen.

I also disagree that "I am willing to pay a lot of money" has any correlation with "this action is worth a lot to me". To make that relationship work, the fine would have to be set at "whatever you personally consider to be a lot of money".
Is there any language toolchain that isn't absolutely static capable of having not only backwards compatibility but also forwards compatibility? If I try to open an MS Office XP file in MS Office 97, it will fail. If I try to run a new linux application that uses a new syscall in an older kernel, it will fail. If I try to use structural pattern matching in Python 3.9, it will fail. How is Rust any different?

If the concern is that projects are using "too new a rustc version", then your beef is with those projects, but be advised that demanding open source projects not use newer versions of their toolchains can be a big ask that increases their workloads and they might not be amenable to cater to your usecase.

Finally, because every Rust version is backwards compatibility, there's no reason for builders and developers to not use the latest stable release as quickly as feasible, all existing projects will continue compiling.
> (sorry, iOS, can’t copy)

What, are you a time traveler from 2009? Since when does iOS not allow you to copy text on a webpage?
Didn’t Pulumi accelerate its adoption by the use of Hashicorp terraform providers? Didn’t AWS use elastic search for free then fork when the license changed? I think there are a lot of challenges around building a sustainable business around OSS that requires a more delicate look than the black or white hot takes around here recently.

…with that being said, I will say that I welcome companies like Pulumi to the IaC landscape. IaC makes a lot of sense conceptually, but unlike a lot of HN (from my perspective), I strongly dislike terraform and HCL and most Hashicorp products. There’s also enough of an impedance mismatch between TF and cloud providers that I’d be poised to just use cloud formation or ARM or something native over tf, which was never cloud agnostic anyway like their marketing claims.
In the case of North Korea I think we can at least pass judgement retroactively on the Korean War. To me the population sizes of North and South Korea alone make is extremely clear who was right and who was wrong in that conflict.
The discussion is about FCC approval for the police to set up a rogue cell site, not FCC approval for this research project.
My favorite prime number generator is the undocumented __next_prime():

https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/78d6a7767ed57b501...

There is no good reason to use this one except in a code golf environment that includes all headers by default, which is where I learned about it.
oh, in a few iterations i got a nude sexy adult woman. clearly they're at risk of generating child porn (you can change the age to child or teen, though for obvious reasons I haven't tried it).
Or for "state" that is already saved on, or known by, the server -- or will be sent to the server for persistence.
Yes, I had my biggest exit before having a kid, but I was married, and my wife did not have a visa that would allow her to work.

This was a bootstrap too.
The Early History of Counting
THANK YOU. I make it a priority to introduce myself, and my disability, during my first 1:1 with every manager I have; it makes a huge difference. The conversation usually goes like:

- I am autistic

- I don't need any particular accommodations

- I will attempt to overcommunicate what I'm doing so that I can get your help if I rabbit hole on something (one of my common tendencies)

- I tend to need mental health days slightly more often than usual

- I will tell people I work with when I'm comfortable doing so, but this isn't a secret and don't feel bad if you accidentally out me.

I've never had a manager be anything but extremely appreciative to receive this context. Normalize talking about your needs, even if you don't have a diagnosed neurodivergence!
But what if you use the generator, post the image in an allowed non-commercial context, and then I copy that image and use it commercially? I have no contract with the AI generator company, and you didn't violate yours; it would seem to me that the violation involved is a copyright violation.
1) Just learn it on your own and embellish your experience. Your new employer is not going to contact your previous employer and ask for details about their containers.

2) Many jobs use containers, but if you get out of the high-tech bubble, you'll find plenty of lower tech companies that haven't even started looking at containers. You'll be just fine with the right company.
I don't think the company with the $120-150k range is trying to hide it from the person who wants $200k, I think they're trying to hide it from the person who wants $110k. If you tell them $200k they just stop talking to you. If you tell them $110k they write it down and carry along with the process and a little green $110k next to your name.
So an article about what happened in the Apple ebooks case is a non sequitur about what happened in the Apple ebooks case?

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised since people are ignoring a judges ruling that Apple isn’t a monopoly and saying it’s irrelevant.
This is a common argument that technology-focused people make:

- it was possible to do this before;
- and we didn't do anything about it then;
- the only difference now is that it's easier;
- therefore, we have no justification to do anything about it now.

The thing is, laws, regulations, and norms are not immediately willed into existence to precisely match harms. It costs a lot to formulate and enforce them.

So, if there is one really weird guy who goes to great lengths to build a home nuclear reactor, we probably don't need new laws or practices against it. If suddenly home nuclear reactors are available for $20, we definitely do.
I find it weird that the title of the article focuses on them so much, but it seems like the barricades there were due to the downed electrical wire or to keep people away from other areas that were on fire. Timed differently driving around the barricade one could have ended up in a worse situation than they already were.

Hindsight is of little value to those who were making decisions in the moment, but really, "make your own rules during an emergency" seems like it isn't guaranteed to be effective. You're just as likely to be adding to the problem as anything.
Gives you more time to think about your reply. The fact that people on other sites comment in less than 500ms could be considered a negative.
Both the parent article and this one seem to omit the first several seconds of the video, which shows what looks like dissipating smoke clouds above the plane; the woman filming it mentions hearing two explosions and seems to think it's a Ukrainian drone being shot down.
The point is that it's context-specific.

Only you have the personal context.

I know several people that have ignored fire evacuation orders and saved their homes instead. No fire department is going to tell people to fight the fire because they don't know people's individual situations.

Shelter and place orders are another funny one. I have a lot of fond memories ignoring shelter in place orders hiking and camping in the wilderness during covid. It probably reduced my risk versus Sheltering at home. Blanket orders were one size fits all, made to address the person that is going to parties and bars.

The government is never looking out for your individual interests. It only cares about the average, and you can be the person that dies as collateral damage from an order that still has a good average outcome
They also published an FAQ recently:

https://www.hashicorp.com/license-faq

This all should be incorporated into the BSL, as the current terms are clearly vague enough that they require a separate (not legally binding) FAQ (as it can be changed at any point...)
> Creativity is a set of algorithms

This, following on the heels of mocking the usage of "sentience"? Heh.

But more importantly, I judge things as I see fit, and I like what I like. What is it to you? If I say I only like to be fondled by my partner, and you say soon enough every place will be so crowded that I can't possibly tell if the hand on my butt is that of my partner, of a random stranger, or of a machine, I can only wonder why anyone would find that desirable, if that is supposed to be some sort of threat, and whether you'll enjoy me "reacting as I see fit" to it.
You can literally sketch this yourself and give to a structural engineer and file for a permit to build.
Assuming hosting costs, credit card fees, etc. - $420,000 a year for 4 people doesn't sound like enough.
With Lovense you can. Don't know about other internet connected toys.
Open core is just as bad as BSL.
In the example it looks like this needs one JSON encoding/decoding step per call for parameters & results which seems a bit inefficient, but maybe my intuition is wrong there? Or does it allow dumping a whole list of vectors (I only see vector1 and vector2 though)?
This is not an unforeseeable occurrence. Hawaii is a tiny island state that is often hit by hurricanes, tsunami, and volcanic freaking eruptions. Any organization that is empowered to close roads needs to have good policies to decide what to do in emergency evacuations so they don't accidentally social-murder anyone.

Somebody decided that preparing for this fully-predictable event wasn't a priority.
> "lets go back to before the industrial revolution"

They did not say this.

> People moved to cities because less agricultural labor was needed and people living close together makes them more productive.

People moved to cities because more industrial labor was needed. Proximity made industries more productive. Now more digital labor is needed. And people living far apart can be highly productive.
Fine then, Phoenix :) But yeah Go is not a good ecosystem for comprehensive web development
We use an open-source mailserver (Haraka), but security audits are the most trustworthy way to do this. We've had 4: skiff.com/transparency. Audits cover infrastructure.
> I think the app store monopoly is literally the thing that lets the bad guys participate in the first place.

Yes! I've been arguing for a long time that the crApp Store is actually a honeypot for criminals. It's a single point of failure, and Apple's reviewers can only spend a few minutes on each submission.

Before the crApp Store, indie devs already set up their own web stores, did their own marketing, etc. Apple has now made it trivial for anyone to publish an app, and that includes criminals! Criminals don't want to make an effort like serious indie devs do. They don't want to bide their time and build up a loyal audience. Criminals just want the quick easy scam money.

Not to mention that it's vastly easier and less expensive to game crApp Store search—and also to buy crApp Store Search Ads!—than it is to game Google search.

The worst part of the crApp Store is that Apple tells consumers, falsely, that the crApp Store is safe. It lowers their guard when they should be suspicious and careful. And of course crApp Store crowdsourced ratings and reviews can't be trusted at all. They're easily faked and/or purchased. Even when ratings and reviews are real, they're often ignorant and badly written, not done by professional reviewers. (As a developer myself, it drives me nuts that reviewers never contact support before writing, and they also put feature requests and bug reports in there instead of writing an actual review of the app.)
We'd be better served by trains. Airplanes are not efficient, and the security theater is annoying.
> If you understand Hindi

Video has captions
> by setting up a simple 30-second delay

anyone knows an easy way to set this up from laptop?
> The issue isn't "what people eat," it's "what taxpayer should pay for." I think what he's saying is that the government shouldn't be paying for unnecessary luxuries for people who can't afford them. If you're on food stamps, they should be good for healthy but modest food.

Food stamps (SNAP) aren't paid out of your taxes. That's not how the federal government works. Your taxes don't pay for other people's food. Taxes are a debt, an obligation to pay. The money you use to pay those taxes comes from the government (and bank credit) in the first place.
Yes - privacy focused mail providers offer this as an option but do not enable it by default. Mainstream mail providers do not even have it as an option.
They straight up give them cell phones when they release them into the interior[0]. None of that is required.

This is to catch mules bringing over drugs and sex traffickers most likely. Once they get to the other side, need to call for a pick up.

[0]https://apnews.com/article/immigration-covid-technology-busi...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37237722
Isn't this a disingenuous argument considering that it was a cable show to begin with. Did Suits ever air on a channel not own by USA's parent company, that would be a more apt comparison.
I think part of the (perhaps unconscious) resistance to thinking clearly about the floor is that the hiring side (i.e. people who do this every day, rather than once every few years) have a knack for sussing out what that floor is and ensuring that that's what you get and not a penny more.

Maybe there is a kind of madman theory of salary negotiation as well, heh: throw out some numbers, don't think about it too much, randomly blow up the negotiation for any reason, or for no reason, etc.

For my part I just accept that I'll be getting the floor or very close to it.
Somebody else mentioned the phase of the moon when John Lennon died (which will be ruined in a few days when google indexs this site). There are results for that on the internet, google fails, Kagi fail, but Bings chat pulled the two different sources (one for the day and one for the phases of the moon).
Not true. GitLab may not be perfect but it is used in many open source places. HashiCorp's products have been rendered completely unworkable for places like Debian. https://salsa.debian.org/public
Interesting, never heard tarballs being classified as odd before. They are still widely used.
I would think, instinctively, that anything we put in orbit and then it falls down would be roughtly equal to roughtly 2x the energy we spent to put that mass in orbit in the first place, but maybe I'm missing something obvious.
> do people really find color schemes like this easier to read

That scheme works great for me. Not just "dark mode," if it were my site i'd have made the colors more neon-ish.
Defined vs. Undefined Games