skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I recently had to use an x86 version of Linux on my M1Pro MBP, hence using QEMU emulation instead of virtualization.
The system was barely usable, although I only had basic headless server/SSH requirements.
Researching a little showed that this is basically what can be expected running x86 emulation and the systems will just be wonky and slow, although it was running flawlessly, just slow.

There seem to be ways to use Rosetta2 inside a VM [0] to then translate binaries but I found no official support or documentation (using UTM+QEMU that was), this would be such a cool feature, at least there are discussions about it [1,2]

- [0] https://mybyways.com/blog/using-rosetta-in-a-utm-linux-vm-wi...

- [1] https://github.com/utmapp/UTM/discussions/4939

- [2] https://github.com/utmapp/UTM/issues/5460
I used to stand on the front seat with my mom driving (she was a terrible driver btw). She also took us kids once on a road trip around the mountains at 12000 ft elevation, lots of snow and exposed roads. This among other negligences unrelated to driving. A true miracle we made it into adulthood.
Yep. Based on my experience with recruiters both as an employee and employer, following this advice is almost certainly just going to do you a disservice.
How is making your website more annoying supposed to “engage” anyone?
Yes. All surveys are biased towards people who are willing to take the survey.

In the most extreme case, if your survey only has one question, "are you willing to take this survey?" you would get 100% "yes".
Probably not. ELK-style log analysis tools benefit from having messages follow a consistent schema. Using a variable as a key makes indexing much more difficult, and can make it impossible to detect patterns where (for example) a single error appears sporadically across many different values of "thing".

If "thing" were a variable with a small cardinality (like a class name or an enumeration), that might change matters. But I'd still be reluctant to do that; having the two values available in separate fields, rather than as a single key/value pair, is a lot more flexible.
The level of competition is insane - many teams utilize industry grade machinery to build custom parts. The skills you can learn translate over directly into industrial robotics.
If it's something you intend to package to a non-Windows user then sure it's not odd. I send file archives to non-tech users all the time internally. I absolutely do not tarball them, I zip them. When it comes to less tech savvy users, a tarball is definitely an odd format to deal with.
Try to upload it on https://revoldiv.com/ we pre-process the file to make it a little Intelligible and you can supply your context when uploading.
The Amazon book case had to do with collusion between Apple and the book publishers. It had absolutely nothing to do with Apple being a “monopoly”.

Unless you somehow think Apple had a monopoly on ebooks.
Getting into fights with assholes might get you some feeling of satisfaction, but I've rarely seen it work out productively. Usually both people get mad and it escalates into a deeper feud that puts both parties into an even worse place than where they started. And suppose you've misread their personality, due to your personal biases or limited information, then who's really the asshole when you start baiting that person? This is why it's usually better to avoid assholes than to "take them down a peg." Usually. Individual circumstances obviously need to be considered.

In any case, the label you apply to somebody after observing their personality traits doesn't tell you which of their buttons to press, it's the observation of their personality traits which may inform your angles of attack. Somebody is observed to be self-absorbed, and is therefore labelled a narcissist, and the observation of their self-centered personality is what tells you how to push their buttons. You can press those buttons whether or not you use or even know the clinical label, people have been doing it for millenia before these labels were formulated. The labels themselves aren't actually useful here. Discrete kinds of asshole is a dubious proposition in the first place. Assholishness is probably a continuous spectrum of behavior, so if you really want to strike at somebody deep you're better off considering them as a unique individual and tailoring your attack accordingly. Of course, once you've considered them as a unique individual you may find yourself less inclined to attack them...
American space program is a shadow of what it once was. Their history is full of daring missions and extraordinary achievements. I wish they would engage in a space race rather than constant illegal, brutal, destructive and absolutely unnecessary war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_Uni...
Raw performance isn't increasing much, price/performance under the 700$ has barely increased both now and in 2000 series.
Apple calls for passage of Right to Repair in California
On-demand generation of NPCs for video games? Or background extras in movies?

Or maybe a people trying clothes on virtually.
And Rivian has a greater market cap than Nissan.
Family²
Should have sold a call credit spread instead!

I'll get right on that...after I go look up what that means. :-) I'm but a simple options trader who sells calls to unload stock I didn't want anymore anyway, and the premium is the icing on that cake. Left some money on the table this time, but I otherwise would have just sold the shares outright, and I did make some bank regardless.

Gonna be missing that sweet, sweet $0.04 dividend, though.
Its worth emphasising that entanglement is not a two-party / duality specific thing.

You can entangle 2 particles, you can entangle 3 particles, you can entangle n particles (although actually doing so becomes a quite hard engineering problem as n grows), you can even entangle different properties of the same particle with each other so the spin and position of an electron can become entangled.

Human brains love dual/pairwise properties for some reason, but they don't seem to actually come up in physics very often.
We were using OpenAI's codex model with a bunch of few shot examples for natural language queries over blockchain data coupled with a finetuned completions model for plot the results when we were working on makerdojo.io.

Without the ability to fine tune Codex, we had to employ a bunch of techniques to pick the right set of examples to provide in the context to get good SQL. We have come very far since then and it has been great to see projects projects like sqlcoder and this.

Pieces of the pipeline powering makerdojo eventually became LLMStack (https://github.com/trypromptly/LLMStack). We are looking to integrate one of these SQL generators as processors in LLMStack so we can build higher level applications.
If you want a green solution they get charged from a solar or wind farm sitting near the port. Solar farms are already being built with large battery systems to better fit the demand curve, adding extra PV and batteries to the mix is a win/win for the electric grid. Edit: Nuclear power is also viable if land is in limited supply in the area, generally more expensive than solar but still way cheaper than fossil fuels.

“Flat out denying the physics of this problem” you’re arguing that sailing ships don’t work.

Maersk the largest shipbuilder in the world already got flettner rotors to provide useful levels of propulsion, ADD a kite system and you’re traveling faster than commercial shipping doing slow steaming. As I’ve said repeatedly they don’t quite work at current fuel prices, but you want to increase fuel prices.. Read up on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Onego_Deusto for why kite’s didn’t take off it was all about the economics not the underlying physics.

PS: Without paying for fuel the economics changes enough we probably aren’t going to see 200,000+ TEU ships and routes would optimize for winds. But that’s not an inherent problem it’s just a tradeoff, perhaps we invest in larger port’s that just an expense not a deal killer.
Accuracy on using an existing face seems pretty off. Certain positions have terrible accuracy on body parts. Why would you care to use this again? This just seems like another AI SaaS scam project where they're basically charging others to use their A100s with their copy-pasted implemented version of the research paper algorithms. These should just all be outlawed IMO.
Researchers have spent several years try to even create a GAN that can fit well a distribution made of aligned faces (resulted into StyleGAN1/2); with a simple unet with e-objective and cosine schedule you can fit much complex distributions, still using one loss: L1/L2.

Reading your comments make me feel like that you believe that just every researchers (even extremely smart dude like Karras) just switch to diffusion models because they are idiots, they should have instead focus on GANs and today we will have GANs that are as powerful or more than the diffusion models we have today and also work one step; this is just a weird delusion. Diffusion models are just simply much easier to train (just a L1/L2 loss in most cases), write (for example your buggy BigGAN implementation), they usually work out-of-box on different resolutions and aspect ratios, you can just finetune them if you want to create an inpainting model; and for what is right now you just need much less compute to reach a good image coherency or maybe just reaching a coherence that as not been achieved by GAN models; like I would be curious even on a small scale experiment what a GAN (with ~55M parameters) would be able to perform after a 1-day/2-day GPU time of training on Icon645 dataset, because my diffusion model I can assure is much better than I could have imagine while being trivial to implement (I just implemented a Unet as I remember one, nothing rigorous and of course no architecture sweep).
This incredible growth was already priced in at 250$.

Now it's just crazy.
Responding only to the title: well, i bloody well hope so! I would expect models to be trained on popular text like his.
I almost immediately closed the window because I thought it was 404ing and it was a dead link. Curious how much traffic they'll accidentally lose with this name.

Coincidentally my company was called 'Bad Gateway', and there's a company near me called 200 OK so welcome to the club =)
Unless you did something exceptional, like create a world-renowned programming language or are a staple in the biggest conferences in your niche, you're interviewing.

But I agree with your general sentiment.

Having a strong network to fall back on when you're looking is much better than throwing fish (resumes) into the barrel.
Nvidia's undervalued.

Once enterprise adoption of AI picks up, demand for chips will increase 2-3 times further.

I'm told Nvidia's building their own fab in Southeast Asia over the next few years. This will massively boost their output.
Huh, not sure why you'd think that? Seems to me like it's never been more popular.
Well, so many words and also such strong words, e.g. "Performance is the key focus. A design goal for Aeron is to be the highest throughput with the lowest and most predictable latency of any messaging system."

I find that hard to believe after taking a glance at their C++ code. Too much std::function for my taste. Maybe it's reliable, but it's probably not lowest-latency. And I'm puzzled that I have to run a Java daemon to interface with my C++ project.
Does that suggest that you could arrange a kind of course that all children got, which taught the union of all phonemes of all common languages, without teaching much of the languages themselves? And thereby future-proof the child with the bits you can't learn as an adult, in case they wanted to learn any particular language later?
Not as "cool" as the SpaceX stuff, but Angara, Amur, Soyuz-5, Soyuz-7 are all in the works.
That’s him
Your assumption is wrong, a large corp is not an organized crime corporation.
To be a CxO of a large corp you just can’t be “people”. You have to be a person qualified way above the rest of us. If you can make millions in a different place not taking the risk of going to jail you won’t take a role in a risky corp.
May be they are psychos, but not idiots.
Beyond a few thousand words (32k tokens for GPT-4), it seems the beginning of the story will be outside of the range that can influence the output, though perhaps there are techniques to retain some memory, maybe you could first generate an outline and then fill in the chapters, scenes and so forth, so the limited memory becomes less of an issue.
More common than mobile phone usage

https://metro.co.uk/2023/08/17/police-use-ai-to-catch-300-dr...
Most companies have a range for each level within their org. Candidates whose expectations are above the range are automatically filtered out. Ones within the range have no problems going forward with the interview/offer. The ones who suffer because of non-disclosure of the range are the ones whose expectation is below the range. People talk. If such a candidate joins your org, they will soon find out they’re being underpaid and will leave as soon as they find a better offer. It looks like disclosing the range is benefecial for both parties. Things are improving with laws mandating a range disclosure with the job application and websites like levels.fyi making things more transparent. There shouldn’t be a need to “neogiate” your salary above/below this range.
I have no opinions to share here on the practice of psychoanalysis, either in its historical or modern form. But it's undeniable that the discursive roots of modern psychology come from Freud in particular, and that when we analyze a phenomenon ("treatment" notwithstanding) we owe ourselves due diligence to understand it properly. The issue is, as I stated, a refusal at the level of legitimation of knowledge, which is ultimately a juridicial question when considered wrt the deployment of psychology to the masses.

To be clear, psychoanalysis is actually cited in the original essay: "Heinz Kohut and Otto Kernberg" are both quite well-known, although divisive figures. But Freud himself, who produced the theory with proper scope to interpret the claims, is not.
Therefore, you admit your question "So did the Epic judge ignore the ruling of another judge where Apple was accused of behaving monopolistic in regards to the App Store?" was made in bad faith, empty rhetoric. Also you agree with me that you bring it up was a non sequitur.
As was mentioned in another thread on a slightly different topic, it wouldn't be surprising to see all non-Nvidia parties unit around some non-CUDA open standard.
The telescope could have been invented thousands of years ago - ancient Egyptians could polish lenses. Ditto for the sextant, optical telegraph, the printing press...

> It would be fun to imagine Antiquity with many modern inventions in it.

Or the modern era with inventions that are due to appear in thousands of years, but which we could easily replicate if we only knew where to look.
> From that point of view, I am always surprised to hear people who hate interviewing, are reluctant to interview, etc. Interviewing is the only real way to learn "the market" - what offers to you would actually look like, and other information as well. Like if you always get offers at the low end of a range - or if you always fail interviews - is very good signal that you can act on.

I don’t think anyone disputes the value of the information. It is just painful to obtain.
Would it be possible to remove that survey bias using coercion? For example, we could hire a gang to break into a supermarket and hold everyone there as hostages until they fill out a consumer preferences and brand visibility survey.
Yes I think we are saying the same thing. I don’t think vim should ship with more than what it does either
Well I'm quite motivated to fix this vulnerability in WinRAR, but I can't.
I don't know what you are even trying to say at this point. Could you explain what you mean in more detail? I'll explain where I'm coming from.

If you bundle DLLs with your program then you have a stable ABI automatically, because it's constant: something you bundle will never change its ABI, because it won't change in any way, because it's bundled. It's constant. Windows developers bundle all their dependencies with their programs. The result is that they don't have issues with their programs not working because the libraries they depend on have changed since they released the program. They might as well be statically linked.

There is nothing Windows-specific about doing this. You can statically link libraries on Linux and you can dynamically link to libraries that you bundle with your program. There's nothing stopping you from doing exactly the same thing that people do on Windows, and it will be just as stable.

The difference between the platforms is that Windows people do this and Linux people don't, I think mostly because they don't properly understand what a platform is in the Linux world. "Linux" as a platform is the kernel, and nothing else. You can't rely on any userspace libraries existing, not even libc. Or you could target glibc+Linux. That's a different platform, where you can assume that libpthread.so, libm.so, libdl.so and libc.so all exist, and some others. But you can't assume GTK+ will exist. Or you can target a particular distribution at a particular version. Then you are reliant on the particular distribution's stability guarantees. You can't expect it to run elsewhere, but you get access to a much wider array of libraries that you can expect to exist (by making non-base libraries dependencies of your RPM).

In all cases, ABI stability (the ability to update dependencies without rebuilding) is a property of the platform you target. To rely on a stable ABI, everything you target needs to provide that ABI stability. If you target a distribution like RedHat Enterprise Linux, then you get 10 years of ABI stability guaranteed. If you target Arch Linux, you don't: as far I understand, every package that depends on a library is expected to be rebuilt when the library is updated, if necessary. If you target Linux itself, or glibc + Linux, then you get ABI stability forever, and they go to extremes to give you that. But in turn you need to bundle any dependencies yourself, by whatever means you like. That doesn't mean you can't update those bundled dependencies when you update the program, of course.
I agree, same with hummus.
I don't know about today. But WinRAR could handle very large files without issue. It would automatically breakup a huge file into a series of smaller compressed files. 7zip AFAIK struggled with larger files. I don't know if things have improved or not.
Exactly.

Nvidia is just one of many lottery tickets and 8% in one day is hardly volatile in stocks.
I can really see Intel figuring this out. A lot of people on HN talking about Intel as an also-ran just like they spoke about AMD before Zen.

Raptor Lake is at 7nm and incredibly competitive there (~2700 single core on geekbench, taken with a pinch of salt). They’re still planning on being on 1.8nm/18A within 2 years, while at the same time ramping up their GPU efforts (albeit using TSMC for 4nm). Nvidia is very much in the lead, but this is just the beginning.

tldr; I ain’t hear no bell.
What about open core do you find unfair, or otherwise take umbrage with.
Developers go cheap.

It's very rare to be in the position to build your own home, as you'll never do it cheaper than a mass market/spec builder. It's almost always cheaper to just sell your property and buy something already existing.

If you do end up building custom, it's almost a waste to find free plans, as you'll want to customize to your liking as much as possible.
The interview is so helpful especially the focus on seeking advice from outsiders who can see the whole picture and be removed from the situation.
Not if I force someone to unwillingly take your survey!
I thought the M1 could run x86 code via some sort of layer they added?
You must be a 100x engineer.
IIRC the history of the async things in TLA in order: Twisted (callbacks), Eventlet (for Second Life by Linden Labs), tornado, gevent; gunicorn, Python 3.5+ asyncio

[ tornado (FriendFeed, IPython Notebook (ZeroMQ (libzmq)),), Sanic (asyncio), fastapi, Django Channels (ASGI), ASGI: Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface, django-ninja, uvicorn (uvloop (libuv from nodejs)), ]

The Async/await keywords were in F# (2007), then C# (2011), Haskell (2012), ... Python (2015), and JS/ES ECMAScript (2017) FWICS from the wikipedia article.

When we talk about concurrency and parallelism, what are the different ~async patterns and language features?

Processes, Threads, "Green Threads", 'generator coroutines'

Necessarily, we attempt to define such terms but the implementations of the now more specifically-named software patterns have different interpretations of same, so what does Wikipedia have or teach on this is worth the time.
More likely around 96%. Don't neglect the Lizardman Constant.
>I can think of a few:

Think of a few what?

You listed a bunch of links to GitLab CE, which is not their enterprise offering, does not compete with their enterprise offering, and has an order of magnitude less functionality and no support. Again, their enterprise offering is already under a proprietary license.

GitLab openly supports anyone deploying and managing GitLab CE: https://hub.docker.com/r/gitlab/gitlab-ce

Not sure what you're alluding to?
I'm not familiar with all the varied uses of GPUs but it seems like image generation could feasibly be distributed: large upfront download of models, then small inputs of text and settings, and small output of resulting images.
You can, just download the latest version.
>fix the identity-relevant variables in the _z_

Is that how the latent space works though; Like if it's a 300-dim vector, is the face at locations 0-10?
> You can always tell job X "I'd love to work with you but it's hard to accept a lower offer, can you match?"

It's of course very dependant on each country and the jobs market, but in my experience the issue would be even getting to have multiple offers in a short enough period of time. To the point that it happening could be called a coincidence, more than anything. Unless you are fiercely hunting for a job (aka. doing several interviews per week), I don't see how it would happen to get an offer and telling the company "well, wait for a couple weeks or a month for my answer" just to see if it happens that offers arrive from the other places and one gets to compare simultaneously.

Seems more likely that an offer comes, you accept or decline it, if declined then other will eventually come some time later, and one can compare them and maybe regret having declined the former, and so on.
They’re all pretty motivated, they’ve been motivated for years, and almost nothing is happening. This situation isn’t exactly a poster child for the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.

Every year just sounds like “Nvidia’s new consumer GPUs are adding new features, breaking previous performance ceilings, running games at huge resolutions and framerates. Their datacenter cards are completely sold out because they can spin straw into gold, and Nvidia continues to develop new AI and graphics techniques built on their proprietary CUDA framework (that no one else can implement). Meanwhile AMD has finally sorted out raytracing, and their consumer GPUs are… well not as good as Nvidia’s but they’re a better value if you’re looking for a competitor to one of Nvidia’s 60 or 70 line GPUs!”
Data center on a barge, using river cooling.

I wonder what happened to the Google barges. I wonder what the ideas were surrounding them.