skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is a bit beside the point. They also use dishes instead of leaves, presumable a modern axe instead of a piece of stone, etc.

To me it’s about finding the sweet spot between staying connected to the thing that you’re doing for the purpose of keeping life interesting/fulfilling and utilizing your time wisely.

Driving stick is like shooting manual photos. Not necessary in 2023, but can be a lot more fun than the alternative, and enables levels of control that cannot be found with automated solutions.

Choosing to walk is like choosing to forego fire altogether.
I don’t know why you need to confabulate what I think. If you want to know, I’m right here you can ask me.
Did it ever support Windows 95? I thought it was too new to bother.
That's an interesting point. Agree that readability is somewhat subjective, but many programmers find .map, .filter, .reduce, etc... as more convenient and provides clarity as to their intentions. Many languages (like Vlang, Java, Python, etc...), arguably also have them to more closely align themselves with the functional programming paradigm.
Hey everyone,

Recently launched "ChatGPT prompts for webflow" Over 100 Tested prompts to add functionality to webflow.

Check it out here
https://www.producthunt.com/posts/chatgpt-prompts-for-webflo...

Would appreciate your feedback
I used to keep sketchbooks, but don't anymore. A couple years ago I took photos of every page of every sketchbook I had, then threw all of them out.
"Denying science" usually means denying scientifically proven facts.
> 19. How does HashiCorp now refer to the freely available versions of products that were formerly known as open source (or OSS)?

> We have referred to versions of our products as either open source (OSS), Enterprise, or Cloud. Going forward, we will refer to the open, freely available versions as “community”. The BSL license is open, free, and source-available. However, it does not meet the definition of open source as defined by OSI, and that is why we will refer to the products as the "community" edition rather than the "open source" edition as we did previously. There are many references to open source on our websites and we are actively working to clarify these language changes in the coming weeks

Source: https://www.hashicorp.com/license-faq#details-on-nomenclatur...
I was there for over a year.

I did have a tax number, since I got paid and presumably paid taxes.

I never went anywhere just to register my address though. That sounds so insane to me.
The side effects example is exactly where I put down the book. I briefly questioned whether the book is supposed to be satire.
Does that only work for OAuth providers you've implemented, or can I use a third party provider? Specifically, can I relatively easily integrate with the Xero API? https://developer.xero.com/documentation/guides/oauth2/overv...
How to create non-game apps in Unity
IMO learning is at the service of building. I learn what I need to build.
If GPT can do the first 30% of any project, then I can focus my learning on the remaining 70%. Just think of GPT as another layer of abstraction.

Sure, pure learning is enjoyable but also ephemeral. Building/doing = learning, yes, but no need to do everyhting.
> It's not about raping

That was a direct reference to the article linked by the grandparent of my original post, regarding bullying suffered by women serving on UK nuclear subs.

Someone responded to that with a comment I read as "yeah, working with women can be a minefield". Sorry if it seemed a bit out of the blue.

> It's about the sexual tension, the emotions, jealousy, consensual pairing causing drama, etc.

Surely this is just part of the human experience. Learning to deal with it is part of growing up. That's not to diminish the difficulty experienced by people going through this stuff, but what's the alternative?
Agile in my experience is very easy to game. Just overestimate all your tasks and you can pretty much work as slow as you want.
Sure, use a note taking app, post comment when online again.

More seriously, you can usually run a debugger locally - it's unclear if that's true for the interface for bun? Eg: can I host the stub on localhost?

Useful when travelling, or debugging in a locked down environment, like a private cloud/data center?
The other thing that space has going for it is that vacuum isn't salty or humid.

You might have to drift quite a bit longer before rescue, however.
eventually they let you in. i think its somewhat ip reputation based (with reputation being how many captches have been solved from that ip). i.e. I've temporarily "burnt" my local IP by doing too many captches in a short period of time so that it wont allow me in easily (i.e. captcha after captchas, probably spend a minute or 2 doing all of them before I get through). However, after some period of time, it resets and allows me in more easily
Since your comment, I've started contacting them one by one with a personalized email. I think it takes some time to found out what exactly to write to get them to respond; yet to get any response.
Since they emphasize cohesiveness and clear code, the goal seems to be more on the educational side. It doesn’t look like they’d want to implement JIT bytecode compilation.
Some types of situations certainly may be like this, not sure why others disagree.
Yeah, papermill is a go-to tool for this usecase
Is there a good "game" to learn basic electronics sort of the same way but on a screen of a computer?
I think the original Phantasy Star was better, I played this port

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantasy_Star_Collection

In the Western tradition fantasy and sci-fi elements are kept strictly apart most of the time, but the game

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultima_(series)

broke that rule, I think the creator wanted to fit every idea he could into the first game. Ultima was vastly influential on western CRPG's but I think it was even more influential on JRPG's like Phantasy Star (which has that genre mixing), Dragon Quest, etc.
Ohhhh yes. I've been on the receiving end of this one. Designing a system which can accommodate higher tolerances on some hardware components through software controls is one thing. Being handed a poorly performing piece of hardware and told to "just fix it in software" is quite another.
> Imagine a world where medicine has solved 100% of problems. Then you could just get obese very easily without much consequence.

Uh ok? And this.... this is a bad situation to you?
Um, can I get you to read my code? Haha
As someone who has no artistic ability I am genuinely impressed with the art coming out of it.
Worth noting that Marie Kondo actually threw in the towel on being so tidy, after giving birth and changing priorities:

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2023/jan/30/queen-o...
I have a hard time not putting this into the lineup of anti-technology moral panic aided by pseudoscience intent on gobbling up a new field.

Do we all remember how "internet addiction" was, at first, a joke in a newsgroup until a psychiatrist stumbled upon it and thought they could make a name for themselves by transferring - badly - existing elements of addiction discourses on internet use? And we're still suffering from their success, which, in psych terms, means that the found enough people they could convince that, yes, really, what they were doing were "sick" (usually because that was a good way to appease their families)[1]? And usually because "healthy use of time", in puritan-capitalist societies, is always magically time spent productively to make money or support the family, God forbid (literally) that it was recreational?

This smells somewhat related, in the line of "but really, it's stressing you. You don't realize, but it is. Trust me. The bill is in the mail."

[1] https://journals.openedition.org/reset/122
You couldn’t necessarily “hook into” it from the Java side, as it would be an opaque interface. But the Go side would make the Java GC process “just work”.
My wife has had kids in all these settings, except the home birth was through the same provider as the birthing center. All of them were covered by insurance, except the birthing center is out of network. There’s an in-network one the next city over.

(This is a perfectly ordinary HDHP/HSA plan through a large company that you’ve heard of.)
Check https://www.servethehome.com/tag/mini-pc/

Your best bet is almost certainly off-lease corporate PCs. They will have video but you can ignore it.

If you want literally no video card at all, you probably have to build your own. Or find one that came with an actual powerful GPU and rip it out. Even a raspberry pi has HDMI.
Through events. You can add reactivity and state propagation through events.
Demographics plays a significant role here. In the U.S. women in the middle 3 quintiles of income have fewer children than the top, and far fewer than the bottom. In countries with more generous maternity policies I believe the trend is not as strong.
Why there is only a Lyme vaccine for dogs
The popular OOP seems to be exactly the opposite of what OOP was meant to be. If you get into the original intentions, it honestly starts to sound more like FP.
Fair enough, though I’ll note that only I’ve given an up-to-date reference.
Just FYI, Intel NUCs are being discontinued so if you want a new one, look for Asus models:

https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/19/23800006/intel-nuc-comput...
You may be thinking of javascript, which has added various kinds of trailing comma over the years, though arrays had them from the start. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/67793166
Yes there is: https://sebastian.itch.io/digital-logic-sim
HuggingFace 235M series D at a $4.5B valuation
Nice stuff. I love the idea of really learning electronics, but I find it very much beyond what I would need to build the things I want to build.

PS. Guys HTTPS please!
Sometimes it helps to look at pull requests/merges on large repos. You can see exactly what the change was, what code was touched, and discussions on those changes so that helps you get a feeel for what's good and bad.
I used Copilot full time for about four months writing Rust and Python, and then stopped completely.

Problem is, LLMs are really good at uninsightful, repetitive, boilerplate-y bits of code that shouldn't be there. The moment I get to anything remotely complex or subtle, it either doesn't grasp what I'm doing, needs more coaxing than it's worth, or worst of all introduces subtle bugs. It just incentivises me to write mountains of pointless code instead of stopping and thinking if it even needs to be written in the first place.

What we get from code writing LLMs are exactly the same kind of "improved productivity" we got a decade ago with IDEs autogenerating Java boilerplate. It might help in the short term, but long term it just masks the pain that drives tools and skills getting better, more concise, less repetitive, more insightful.

On the other hand, I'm really looking forward to tools that will be able to figure out how much "insight per line of code" our code has, some sort of "Kolmogorov complexity" but with LLMs. Anything too predictable, anything LLMs can easily fill in is a good code smell signal.
Go GC is already written in Go.
Last year I received a LinkedIn message from a recruiter. After the first online call, I was invited into the office, where her manager was also sitting at the table. After a few minutes I realized that everything she had promised me in the first meeting had been denied by her manager. I just said what I don't see myself doing in this position, which she didn't understand because I met all the requirements.
ICQ had rooms as well
This is a subject where I really wish I had a good experienced friend/mentor to take me by the hand and teach me it.

I have an engineering degree (10 years ago) but I honestly don't have a clue of how this shit works, other than some basic physics intuition.
Skin health can be used to predict a number of seemingly unconnected factors
> studies have found home births with certified professional midwives in the US to have very low rates of maternal and infant mortality

Does this factor in that high-risk births might be more likely had in the hospital?
The problem is less that the context runs out (although for a full novel, it does become a challenge, since 32k tokens is only about half a book).

The problem is more than the AI has no concept of actually telling a coherent story. It doesn't tell anything exciting or novel or cohesive - it just spits out similar literary sentences, and the more it spits out sentences that look like random novel content, the less cohesive the story gets as it matches more an more strongly on previous content that looks like random novel.

Honestly, it's less like a real novel, and more like a panorama of small chunks of all sorts of different stories - Mostly unrelated and uninteresting.
https://archive.is/OviQx
Could this be used with an AE modular synth rig? https://www.tangiblewaves.com/
They’ll have to implement java.lang.Thread somehow, or not a lot will run on that JVM.
Adding `install: --no-document` into ~/.gemrc is something of a reflex for me. Should only be getting `ri` docs these days by default though.
As long as a user can only run the code they (or the page author) has entered by themself, I don't see an issue. It gets more problematic if you allow users to store modified cells and link to them. Then a malicious user could write a cell amd trick another user into executing it.
> It's no different than having a junior dev working for you

In my experience it's completely different.

A junior dev who wants to produce a PDF automatically will have to spend a few hours evaluating all the library options and learning their usage. But the code will certainly be free of syntax errors and will produce not-obviously-wrong output before they send it for code review.

ChatGPT will select a library and know how to use it instantaneously - and yet, might call methods that don't exist. Which any human developer would have caught on the very first test run.

They do have certain things in common though - ChatGPT certainly comments code like a beginner programmer :)
There is Turing Complete [0], although it's still somewhat in development, but it is very much playable.

[0]: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1444480/Turing_Complete/
This is different from what I observe though. One can believe that the scientific method is the best way we know of to understand reality, without assigning dogma status to any particular artifact that comes out of this process. Doing so is, ironically, actually anti science (in the scientific method sense), which is probably what makes it so creepy.
I have mixed feelings about this. I switch back and forth between two editors: Emacs for Clojure and other lisps (and Org Mode and Magit), and VSCode with Copilot for, well, most everything else. This ad hoc setup provides a little bit of "personal A/B testing" -- feeling the difference Copilot makes.

When I was learning Go I had Copilot on most of the time. I was amazed at how much progress I could make despite being new to the language. And, when switching to Emacs, I'd notice myself reflexively waiting for Copilot to supply autocompletions that weren't there.

Yet, strangely enough, I can actually write Go code now (with or without Copilot). All the troubleshooting, refactoring, redesigning, bug fixing, etc. that I still had to go through saw to that. (Presumably having programmed already for many years didn't hurt.) Repeated and quick exposure to the relevant idioms supplied by my tooling seems to have helped at least as much as it set me back.

On the lisp (Clojure, Elisp, ...) side of things, I have found Copilot (and ChatGPT) much less helpful, presumably because of the relative paucity of training data. Simple things such as matching parentheses seem to elude these tools, and hallucinations are worse and more frequent. I'm still feeling out how this difference w.r.t VSCode/Copilot and other languages affects my experience and the quality of my output, but it definitely feels different (and, frankly, a little clumsier).

Over time I've learned how helpful different kind of tools are for making software. Learning one's editor well. Writing good (and fast) tests. Using linters and code formatters. Using type systems when available. The new AI tools certainly involve trade-offs, but as I gain experience with them I am becoming convinced that putting them aside will make programming a different, and probably much slower, experience than what most programmers come to experience. (Slow can be good, but probably not what most of us want.)
Awesome. Thank you very much. Is there any for basic analog electronics as well?
Hugging Face raises $235M from investors including Salesforce and Nvidia
“Those who will accuse us of irrationalism have an extremely narrow view of rationalism, a view that scientists have abandoned a long time ago. Ever since quantum mechanics came to be, and quantum mechanics is probably the greatest scientific idea of this century (n.b. the 20th -ed.), you can kiss goodbye to causal explanation.“

There we go! Relativist anti-science nonsense masquerading as rational thought.

Yes, psychology and other “soft” sciences have serious issues. But I suggest to the author (and Rota) to understand physics (and the level at which quantum effects become viable) before quoting physicists.

Most of this article revolves around semantics. Pity! It had potential.

Check out the fraud committed by Francesca Gino. If it takes a decade to catch the smart Harvard professor (earning a couple of million dollars per year) who made zero effort to hide her data fabrication/manipulation, ya gotta wonder how pervasive the practice really is.
It's not in the article. That comes from a research paper that I can't find easily at the moment. Here's a famous article that discusses the animal model and footnotes a study showing 20 minutes in rats, too. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4495877/
Indicating which days are available during a reservation flow seems like an obvious example.
Wise ideas. working on them.

I think the first one is the most important one.

Thanks for the kind word on item 5. Gives us hope :)
Meta launches own AI code-writing tool: Code Llama
Is this more than just pattern recognition? I mean, what you're saying is that we're wising up to the fact that "buy this for nature/sustainability/etc" is just another way capitalism gobbles up and resells criticisms against it. Capitalism is destroying the planet? Well, just make more plastic stuff and slap a "sustainable" label on it, we'll sell the good conscience AND the plastic stuff all in one.

The past/elder angle is equally fake, it just sells traditionalism, another anti-capitalist current, as a product, only that.. it's not as played-out yet?
My point is that AI is just a tool for programming and that I see it as more comparable to the difference between walking and driving than the difference between driving stick and automatic.
It's not a problem if the error margin means nothing - the baby comes out between 38-42 week is all good.

It is a problem because if you run out of the pre determined terminus based on erroneous scans you will get c-section because protocol.

Of course this is a personal anecdote and may not apply to your country.
> I think people wishing for the death of Putin have a real lack of imagination for what comes immediately after.

Well I'd suggest in the continuum of latter-day Andropov to Putin he's the most authoritarian, so we have a couple of decades of less oppressive examples.
It is crazy to me that it is still 100x the ARR at this stage. I think for Deel, it as around 12x
Hi -- thanks for the kind words. While right now the engine only works with OpenAI, swapping out other LLMs simply from the envars is on the roadmap. Since we use Langchain for LLM calls this logic is already abstracted away so it will be a small code change.

We have some samples (including a quickstart in the README and docs https://dataherald.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html) but will be adding more tutorials in the coming days.
It's a really bad TA that has no self awareness of its limitations. You are well aware that it hallucinates, right? You probably have observed it yourself in domains you're familiar with. But how would you recognise a hallucination in something that you have no familiarity with?

"Learning something new" from LLMs is like trying to learn something new from a con artist. Sure, they might actually tell you the truth, but having little knowledge of something is exactly the worst possible state to be in while trying to figure out what's true and what's hallucinated.
Well, there you have it - zero confirmation that there's any biological weapons research - just confirmation that the US supports biological research labs.

You do realise that the overwhelming bulk of biological research labs do mundane work that's dull and boring?
A history of text-to-image AI
I don't believe a remote host that has access to your forwarded agent can extract the keys().

But they can tell the agent to authenticate with any key loaded in your agent, not just the one you used to ssh into the machine you forwarded your agent to

So e.g if you have a distinct ssh key for GitHub and a different one for all other uses and you ssh to a compromised server with agent forwarding, the attacker can then ssh to GitHub as you.

() there was a vulnerability not too long ago involving getting the remote agent to load arbitrary shared objects for remote code execution, which obviously changes things
the sparkfun videos give a pretty good intro to the kinds of parts they sell.

Also, if you're only interested in small hobbyist circuits, it will simplify things if you only think about DC. AC is a rabbit hole of electrical engineering and physics complexity that you may not be interested in quite yet.
The ideal way to read a deck like this, is to download the pdf and enter present mode on your pdf viewer so that you can click through each slide and immediately see where the new material has been added.
A new generation preserves tribal land and culture in America’s national parks
…and the library might be obsolete, unmaintained, or outright a wrong choice for the task at hand.
Why do you need https for this site?
I'd add to 97 things every programmer should know, there is also a '97 things every architect should know', which is just as good.
Meta releases Code Llama, a code-generating AI model
I wish I could upvote your comment more times.

Everything you said.

But I also think this is not sustainable long-term, to have to decode each biological mechanism by putting together large teams and lots of $$$$$$$ working for many years. After all, there are millions and millions (conservatively) of biological processes.
I'll worry when it starts a union :)
Show HN: Store and share where you keep your things on iOS
This is a pretty good post. The weak part of it to me is that I have never felt pushed to use any particular new fancy type stuff if I don't want to. Don't want servant's type-level http apis? Drop down a level and use warp. Libraries are often layered this way because it's understood that excessively complicated types can be a trap. One does have to develop an intuition for how far to go, which will involve making mistakes.
Code llama Python is very interesting. Specifically tuned for Python.

I wonder if we could make such specific LLMs (one that is proficient in all things Rust, another- all things Linux, all things genomics, all things physics modeling etc) and have them talk to each other to collaboratively solve problems.

That would be a crazy future thing! Putting machines truly to work..
Haha, good point. I don't believe marketers don't do "real work". Like any other profession, very hard to find some that are good in what they do.