skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I was talking about a hypothetical RTSC that was amenable to industrial scale, not LK-99. Even so, merely knowing that RTSC with poor properties existed, would lead to massive search of the nearby (and other) spaces for better properties.

See the history of glass optimization- hundreds of years of poking around with terrible quality glass, then a revolution during the Schott era, to modern day Gorilla Glass. Or silicon- the initial transistor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Replica-of-first-transist...) was not something you could shove into a missile, that took 15 years to develop. To today's modern ICs which approach the atomic limits of semiconductor manufacturing.

The hope is that the initial RTSCs will follow a similar path, obvious there no guarantee
Most of people don't care and will buy, and this will destroy the market, because other automakers will follow this rotten path
There must be a relationship here between Shannon's estimation that english is 1 bit of entropy per character and is highly redundant and 'easy' to predict.

A highly advanced AI could compress the text and predict the next sequences easily.

This seems like a direct connection like electricity and magnetism.

And maybe that's why English needs to be about 1 bit because we're not very intelligent.
If a store did that to me, I would dispute the credit card charge. It's a defective product.
The Associated Press: Standards Around Generative AI
That's only one handle. The part sharing between "sister" brands is beyond ridiculous. It adds up.
What’s with all these empty comments?

I understand that git submodules is not so well known, but doesn’t your curiosity kick in when you see Apple releasing a bunch of empty folders? Don’t you want to spend 1 minute to understand why?

Do you feel like spending that minute to write “just a bunch of empty folders” is such a good thing to do?
Because it's inequitable. You rely on an impoverished underclass to prevent your waste, while harming their ability to change the situation.
Your first three points are blind assertions without supporting justification or basis. All have been 1) identified as known issues for spammers (e.g., HN used to publish its block list, it no longer does, based on observed response, which mirrors experiences at many other sites), and 2) the workarounds given. You don't accept either the fact of the first or the utility of the 2nd, however you're on parlous ground in doing so.

The fact that some spammers overcome some countermeasures in no way demonstrates that:

- All spammers overcome all countermeasures.

- That spam wouldn't be far worse without those countermeasures.[1]

- That removing such blocks and practices would improve overall site quality.

I've long experience online (going on 40 years), I've designed content moderation systems, served in ops roles on multi-million-member social networks, and done analysis of several extant networks (Google+, Ello, and Hacker News, amongst them), as well as observed what happens, and does and doesn't work, across many others.

Your quest may be well-intentioned, but it's exceedingly poorly conceived.

________________________________

Notes:

1. This is the eternal conflict of preventive measures and demonstrating efficacy. Proving that adverse circumstances would have occurred in the absence of prophilactic action is of necessity proving a counterfactual. Absent some testing regime (and even then) there's little evidence to provide. The fire that didn't happen, the deaths that didn't occur, the thefts that weren't realised, etc. HN could publish information on total submissions and automated rejections. There's the inherent problem as well of classifying submitters. Even long-lived accounts get banned (search: <https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...>). Content moderation isn't a comic-book superhero saga where orientation of the good guys and bad guys is obvious. (Great comment on this: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26619006>).

Real life is complicated. People are shades of grey, not black or white. They change over time: "Die a hero or live long enough to become a villian." Credentials get co-opted. And for most accounts, courtesy of long-tail distributions, data are exceedingly thin: about half of all HN front-page stories come from accounts with only one submission in the Front Page archive, based on my own analysis of same. They may have a broader submission history, yes, but the same distribution applies there where many, and almost always most submissions come from people with painfully thin history on which to judge them. And that's assuming that the tools for doing said judging are developed.
AFAIK Chrome uses the OS certificate store, so you should just need to provision your CA in the OS itself.

For iPhones you may be able to use configuration profiles, which are also useful if you want to set up stuff like email accounts, etc. However, it's been a while since I made on of those, so I don't know if you can use it for certificates. You may have better luck with Letsencrypt instead.
You are still a victim even if you shoot someone? Unless you are shooting them for no reason...

Do you carry pepper gel or spray? A taser?
> Even Docker, for example, runs natively on Linux and Macs

It runs natively on Linux. On Macs it starts a Linux VM and then does containers inside that, which adds overhead (and seems to preallocate a lot of ram).

Other than that yes, you can have a working GUI and a unixy enough command line on the same machine. And that's why I switched to macs... from linux.
Unfortunately GPUs (and even CPUs' SIMD) floating point math is riddled with cross-platform determinism issues; hardware manufacturers intentionally trade that in order to get faster math operations in general, because although behavior of floating point is defined in IEEE 754, you get rounding errors for each operation.

Compiler optimizations (and remember, GPU drivers each use their own compiler behind the scenes to translate to their actual hardware architecture) can alter rounding errors of each operation, and parallel execution - which differs from hardware to hardware - also affects it.

Some APIs (Cuda?) let you disable all optimizations and there are ways to get cross-platform determinism, but in general it's much much slower if you want bit-for-bit equality across different hardware.

SPIR-V/Vulkan for example[0] only define an error range based in ULP for some operations - not bit-for-bit equality.

[0] https://registry.khronos.org/vulkan/specs/1.2-extensions/htm...
too late to edit, but I meant "NES" Zelda, not "NEW" Zelda
It's bad for all consumers, even if you don't buy a Tesla. It encourages other manufactures to software lock hardware you own. Soon there won't be any alternatives, I choose to object now.
How England’s football league is breaking the sport [video]
Are those other 99% shares tasting at this price or are they locked away? If they were included in trading the purchase would likely be significantly lower and so would the valuation
Yes, that would work.

It still sucks that if I want a browser on my LAN to talk with a server on the same LAN, I now somehow still need internet access (to renew the cert), need at least two accounts on 3rd part cloud services (the domain registrar and Let's Encrypt) and have to continuously pay for the domain.

Oh, and also have to mess around with the DNS configuration on the router, so the domain is correctly resolved to your LAN IP inside the network, but does not have A/AAAA records on the internet.

Also, this solves this problem for geeks with some knowledge of network protocols, but it still leaves everyone stranded who would like to run a local server but has no deep technical knowledge.

Finally, it's impossible to solve this problem in a large-scale manner, i.e. for devices you want to sell. Which is why the access menus for home routers will probably still stay on plaintext HTTP.
None of the US social media companies are allowed in China.

It seems appropriate that a Chinese social media company would not be allowed in the US.

Meta and X and Alphabet all would be in favor of that, sure, but that doesn't mean it's unfair.
Google asks your kid, and they can pick either way. You can tell them "Hey, this is a device I bought for you, using a cell phone service I pay for, so either reenroll in supervision or I'm taking my device back". A little harsh, but... then you still get roughly the same level of control as before.
I'm confused, If it's using the same kwh battery, How does this save money for Tesla ?
The album Days of Future Past by The Moody Blues is that way for me.

As far as individual tracks:

I Just Wasn't Made For These Times (From Pet Sounds) certainly hits differently depending on when you hear it.

Landslide by Fleetwood Mac has a similar effect for me.
I can. My ex can't. My parents can't. My ex's parents either can. Strangely enough, normal people can't.
And that's the issue.
I don't have kids, so that aspect I can't comment about. But I was a kid one time and keeping me away from a screen (after I got the taste of them) was challenging. They caved.

A direct comparison to toxins is hard indeed, but how about gambling? It obviously has enough addiction potential to induce certain people into compulsive and destructive behaviour warranting regulation. The same research that's been done in the gambling industry is being used in social media and especially mobile gaming today.

A global solution != a European solution/framework.
It's pretty wild that the scientific community can make such a judgement on a reasonably difficult to assess result in 2 weeks. This is not proper peer review (lower case p).
Worked for Haiti, right??
If it’s software locked to below the true battery capacity, then yes by definition they don’t fully top up. Which is actually a lot better for the battery long term. Nice silver lining for these cars. Sure you can do the same by refraining from topping up yourself in a regular model but then you don’t get the price break.
An interested reader can decide for themselves:

https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/tree/main/spr...
See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36509752
You can buy a domain, put public NS servers on it for the only purpose of doing Letsencrypt DNS validation. Hint: Create root and wildcard (eg domain.ca and *.domain.ca) so you aren't leaking internal DNS records (not that it matters much).

You run an internal DNS server (Pihole + unbound is my combo of choice) which becomes authoritative for your internal LAN.
The non-ionizing methods for EM are still based on photon energy for which RF has orders of magnitude less than UV which is ionizing on the high end and near ionizing on the low end.

There is no know non-thermal mechanism which RF can cause DNA damage and you did not seem to present one, only that the photon energy of UV is high enough to cause photo chemical effects that RF simply cannot do.
makes it easy to deliver power from huge centralized fusion reactors to the edge. It is neither sufficient, nor necessary, but could be a useful thing to have.
I was wondering what the newly exposed vector of exploitation was here and I think you nailed it.
I wish that people were that rational. It would make all sorts of things in business life a whole lot easier.

But the reality is that they aren't.
> There is no excuse for any public facing website with a fully-qualified domain name to not have encryption anymore.

One really good excuse is for sites like neverssl.com. Its sole purpose is to always be unencrypted so janky WiFi (and truly horrifying ethernet) setups can work.
This is hilarious.

In compression contest circles, there's long been this concept of "AI compression" (long before the current LLM wave), considered the upper limit of compression algorithms. This is based on the idea of the Dictionary... IIRC, some compression systems include the Dictionary as part of the decompressor, to save space in the payload, but then that Dictionary is fixed and may be suboptimal for the data. Others include it in the payload, so that it's optimal for the data, which most do.

But you could achieve incredible compression of, say, The Complete Works Of Shakespeare if you knew your peer knew about The Complete Works Of Shakespeare (had a rich enough dictionary) and just send them that designator of the payload! Or, you could send them a particular high-resolution picture of a wheat field with cypresses under a blue sky with an appropriately specific "description".

What Fabrice did is gone ahead and put this theoretical idea in practice. And that's hilarious.
I regret to inform you that there are many Americans lugging around an extra 200lbs unrelated to their EV. They are however, still allowed to drive.
> By making the price an “Automated Discount” to some number between the U&C price and the reimbursement price, Amazon can charge less

I don't think Amazon is "making" the price to some number. It's just applying the manufacturer discount automatically
mt-100 vs. margin-top: var(--100);

And the IDE will help you autocomplete it all. The same is true for all the other properties you enumerated. If it's a Tailwind design token, it can be a pure CSS design token. No "whack-a-mole" needed here.

Still, you're right about having documentation. And there has been a loooot of these kinds of doc (BEM, SMACSS, ITCSS, etc.) in the last 15 years. Nonetheless, a more modern-oriented one is indeed needed. And that's why I'm working on something like this.

As for the "15 seconds", I mean, really? If so, I beg to disagree. There is a lot to take in. And that is why numerous colleagues still have to open the Tailwind docs to know how to write a class that's not 1:1 CSS.

And lucky you if you haven't had any update and dependency issues in the medium to long term. But I know we had.

> Or just use the extremely complete, well-considered, well-defaulted, well-documented, well-supported, always-improving set "of CSS features".

The sentence above is every bit as true as yours. Add a beautiful design language and you are in business.
Make America Great Again like the olden days: Trains.
State lawmakers want tougher regulation of AI
Yes it's extremely hard to find info about it, almost as if they didn't want it to be too visible

Here you go, it used to be on youtube but was deleted for some reasons:
https://amp.dw.com/en/so-long-superstores/video-65225396

At 35min you learn about a returned box of coffee pods that travels about 2000km through France, Germany, czech republic and end up in Slovakia in a garbage processing plant. The product was unopened and had an expiration date 2 years in the future, it's just cheaper for them to dispose of it than verify its status and restock it
>> Reminder that compression = intelligence:

If I conclude from this that you mean that gzip is intelligent, will I be accused of bad faith?
not working in SEA, though :/ there are some tricks with apps synthesizing a electromagnetic radio signal via speaker activity but i never got this to work.
Or are they just accurately reporting the range:

https://www.motortrend.com/news/tesla-ev-lying-range-much-wo...
I am perfectly capable of managing, simply unknowns, it doesn’t have to have an actual boolean value. Treating it as bullshit is not the correct approach - sure, there is a healthy amount of skepticism, realism to have, but while RTSC is a too nice to be true goal, it is not fundamentally against any known laws, I would retain my bullshit behavior to faster than light travel, the daily tesla-free-energy-for-the-world, etc. kind of low-effort ones, and even in their case would hold a tiny 0.001% chance of my skepticism being wrong.
Does simply uppercasing it avoid these concerns?
Albini doesn't agree with you, or didn't at the time they were making the records anybody cares about. They were tight in the '80s.

sec later

(But, from your other comment on this thread, that might not make a difference to you! I'll note that this an artistic judgement though, not a moral one, and you seem to value his artistic output.)
> 1. SNOW's market cap is $50B. GOOGL, MSFT, AMZN are all over $1T. Owning Snowflake would be a drop in the bucket for any of them (let alone if they were splitting the revenue).

FAANG can't utilize their market cap to buy SNOW, they would need to pay cash, and 50B is very large amount for any of these companies (its about annual Google net income).

Also, snow stock is very inflated now, it is heavily income negative, and revenue not that high, stock price is very high on growth expectations.
I thought that was about LLMs being trained on compressed data. But I might be thinking about a different paper.
You can have a local DNS server that tells computers on your network where to find intranet-hosted applications. I use my Pihole for that purpose, but you can set up a regular DNS server just as easily.

In my case, my router just has a setting for what DNS server to use, and I point it at my local DNS instead of 1.1.1.1 or whatever.
The reason this works is because LLMs are trained to minimize the empirical risk over a large set of data (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_risk_minimization), and it is where the log-likelihood-based measure comes from, oftentimes represented simply as the perplexity.

This is precisely because LLMs learn a representation of the nth-order Markov Chain, which by its nature is extraordinarily sparse. This allows for excellent compression, and I would assume (and have for a while, I suppose) the nearly-linear nature of LLMs allows for excellent interpolation between these very sparse states.

This lets us 'break' the hard-combinatorial problem into one that can be softly, albeit with the fuzzy error that comes with any estimator.

Since computers cannot tractably compress markov chains past a certain point, this allows LLMs some opportunity to outpace traditional methods for compression, at least in theory.

Also, this method technically cheats since you need the language model to decompress, which counts towards your dictionary size. In a truly unbounded case, I would be interested to see which method wins. I'm assuming it's the LLM.

Apologies for any factual inaccuracies or such, I am still learning many of these things. Many thanks and much love! <3 :))))
Or even heat by burning wood?
If you don't want TLS warnings then just create the certificates from a single (self-signed) root CA and deploy the CA certificate in your local Chrome, Windows, etc.

As an added bonus you get actual security. Since anyone can just recreate your self signed certificates currently because no one bothers to check them.

For example something like this: https://arminreiter.com/2022/01/create-your-own-certificate-...
> I don't think Albini would agree with the summation here, that his public articulation of edgelord opinions was all for the good.

I agree; a lot of that was puerile garbage. What I recognize from those outbursts is the almost-manic raw juvenile need to be a contrarian and stir shit up. I empathize because I felt it when I was young.
Same.

I avoided reading up on it too deeply, because it seemed to be much bigger than I was expecting, and I didn't believe they'd get something that big through congressional gridlock.

I basically assumed there were some poison pills baked in, and nothing much would come of it.
So many projects still using GPT in their name.

Is the thinking here that OpenAI is not going to defend that trademark? Or just kicking the can down the road on rebranding until the C&D letter arrives?
Linux distro repositories commonly use http and gpg verify on the host, as the repository hosting provider may be as grey party. I assume tls overhead on CDNs would be substantial, so if cryptographic verification can be offloaded elsewhere, maybe that is a reasonable solution in some cases.
For this model of Tesla, you have to wonder what kind of buyer $10k matters to that much, especially considering the hit that range takes.

If you're already paying 80 or 90k for an electric car, does making it $10k cheaper make much of a difference to you? Range is almost incidental; probably most Tesla owners most of the time (I would guess) won't miss that extra range.

At the very least, it will be a good test of the price sensitivity of Tesla buyers. If they are looking to ship more units, this is a good way to figure out how to do it. My guess is it won't really matter much.
This doesn't make sense unless you use the CA for something in addition / more critical for HTTP.

Sure, you could leak said CA, but it's only going to leave you in the same position as HTTP.
This gives them an out actually
Great question! If it unlocks more headroom to compensate for aging battery that would be fantastic.
It's even simpler: it's hard to manufacture complicated things 100% correctly, so it's easier to make the most complicated version and bin/fuse off feature sets based on where the defects are (rather than just throwing out all chips with any defects).
Could you point me in a direction that I can research for this? It seems interesting.

I don't trust social media companies to self-regulate this kind of stuff at all.
It was surprising to me too when I encountered it, but yes, at least at my college, in the rare instance that you needed an "Official Transcript", you filled out a form on a portal that included the address for it to be sent to. I think we got three for free and then they were like $15 a pop or something. I have no idea why they did this and did not just stamp/seal it and expect me to mail it myself.
> There is no excuse for any public facing website with a fully-qualified domain name to not have encryption anymore.

neverssl.com is a legitimate use case (though the fact that it's even needed is unfortunate).
Here's a Wikipedia page for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasive_earthworms_of_North_A...
Bellard still does great work... But no longer releases anything opensource.

In turn, that makes it far less interesting to me.

Especially since the majority of what he releases is more of a cool tech demo than a product in it's own right. A closed source tech demo really isn't of much use to anyone who doesn't have the source code to extend it.
Governments didn't decide this out of the blue, they're responding to a right-wing moral panic over LGBT content that's the result of the normalization of QAnon's conspiracy theories within the Republican Party. Don't blame government when they do what the people demand, blame the people who come out with their Bibles and pitchforks and demand the heathens be purged.
More sales to folks who were borderline on buying one, presumably still at a (smaller) profit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_discrimination
It's always weird to me when everyone at a fireworks show on the Fourth of July has their phones out taking video. There are a gazillion videos of better fireworks shows taken with better video equipment. Why do you need a phone video of this one?

If you're taking a short clip to post to social media, I can understand that, but these people who hold their phones up and watch the show through the screen for the entire duration... why?
That is also beyond ridiculous and bad for the consumer. I feel like this is even worse though because it also includes environmental damage due to decreased efficiency and excess waste from the unneeded battery capacity (one of the most toxic parts of a car).
Another point is: It's properties might still be interesting (possibly amazing, just not a superconductor).

A significant reduction in room temperature resistance would still be incredible, even if it wasn't a "room temperature superconductor." Might still enable a lot of those "exciting conversations." Just not some binary yes/no computer holy grail.

Also, big effect was scientists went "Whoa. There's a whole mode/regime of resistance change we never really looked at." The modeling papers that came out almost immediately were really interesting. Might still have cool applications.