skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don’t know what you want us all to agree on here. It sounds like GP disputed you setting the bar at “should have improved the lives of most Americans”. That did seem like an unreasonable bar to judge companies by.

It’s not super controversial that Tesla is likely overvalued, but shareholders generally still have a reasonable expectation of upside on new shares purchased so they continue to buy. I’d hope most of the qualified shareholders understand those returns are coming from speculation rather than valuation.

“Silicon Valley” seems inaccurate, most Tesla employees are in Nevada, Texas and China.

Also you talked about “Elons companies”, not just Tesla. The only company I can think of that maybe hadn’t been delivering value to both customers and shareholders is SolarCity. It’s acquisition was super sketchy but it no longer exists in any case.
I'm not at all debating our doubting that individuals can have massive impact. But for something truly global to happen - in appreciable time, too - you need some form of coordination. An individual might be able to bring about that coordinating instrument, or might be able to convince existing coordinating instruments to act.

But my point, which is a bit muddy, I readily admit, is that if you are faced with a global problem (say, climate change or COVID-19) that individuals can play a very important role in it but individual action by itself won't be enough to achieve the desired global outcome. This is because there are many transnational and super powerful entities that may well be opposed to the change and that there exist several really large organized units that may not play ball in the name of profits or needs or anything else they deem material.

So with starting I was thinking more about the individual doing the thing (say: put solar panels on your roof) to manifest an energy transition. Sure, it helps. But it isn't sufficient and eventually it will fizzle out. And that's one where every little bit helps so it really does make a difference in the aggregate. But meanwhile a single industrial entity (say an aluminum smelter that converts raw bauxite to usable bulk aluminum) will offset the efforts of so many individuals that grassroots efforts won't be sufficient.

But your point about individual contributions and the ability of individuals to galvanize larger entities into action (by shame, an appeal to ethics, by boycott, by protest or by vote) is well taken.

When I was 17 or so (now 41 years ago) I wanted to go work in Petten, NL because I saw the early wind power efforts as very promising. It took decades to get to the point where it made some serious inroads and still we are fighting individuals and large (and wealthy) institutions and lobbying orgs to get those things out there. There were a couple of materials science breakthroughs in that time (notably: Kevlar and Neos) that helped put those out there but technically speaking there wasn't much that stopped us from rolling out windpower on a much larger scale much earlier. This really bugs me.

Some problems need fast and coordinated action at a global level and my general feeling is that we simply do not have the tools in place to do this. The UN is structurally undermined by the parties that hold the most power and international courts are routinely ignored. Einstein at some point advocated for a UN with teeth and I think that would have been a good start.

http://lotoisdumonde.fr/initiatives/FSMAN/Einstein-UN-letter...
Gen Z?
That sounds like bandwidth-delay product [0] with extra steps.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwidth-delay_product
The problems spoke for themselves over the course of the presentation.
Something as simple as a counter was very complicated to look at, filling the screen with jiggling nodes. The presenter then introduces a bug while trying to decrement, and is unable to debug it.
Well.. in this case, it doesn't really do either; but terminology noted. :)
> listen to what Elon says, it is pretty clear on what his goals are. And contrary to what most believe, it is not to make himself tons of money.

If you believe that, I have a social network to sell you...

Come on, the guy who keeps cozying up to the political party that denies global warming and loathes environmental protections is just looking out for the planet? The guy who spends hours on twitter trolling people, and refuses to honor contracts and severance payments is actually a misunderstood good guy?

Elon is great at attracting talented people and investors to his companies, and a big part of that is his ability to spin a compelling yarn about saving the planet or living on mars bases. That doesn't mean he's actually trying to save humanity. We're already seeing him pivot to a totally different persona, or maybe just not bothering to hide his true self as much.
Seems like a nice idea, but a mostly blank website with random Venmo links cannot be trusted these days. Better to go through official routes and accept the overhead/ineffciencies IMO
Einstein's 1947 Letter to the United Nations [pdf]
Unfortunately this is just about as useful as economic theories that rely on perfectly rational consumers. Good on paper, worthless in the face of human nature.
You implied that due to lack of positive right’s you had no inclination to care about the negative one. As a result I was led to believe that you didn’t understand the difference and why it may be the case that people care more about one than the other due to the core philosophical difference between them.
You might be thinking of DRAM, which does work that way. Reads discharge the memory array capacitance so the data has to be amplified and rewritten.
What’s the "dark pattern"?

Do you think more people would be surprised if hitting that button disconnected their Apple Watch, or left it connected?
On Cans (2014)
I have two criteria:

1. Reviews by that author/site are exhaustive, not one-paragraph reheated press releases.

2. Reviews by that author/site are sometimes negative. A site that has all positive reviews is just a marketing brochure.

I am also more forgiving of affiliate links when it's a random nobody/blogger/Youtuber who is making money solely from affiliate links. What's slimy is when big magazine brands double dip on affiliate links and display ads -- e.g., "Hey, REI: we'll push all our affiliate links to REI.com if you buy X number of ads on our website."
They also make the innards for almost all microwave ovens: https://youtu.be/YSrVG74Emyk
Ah yes, that program. I tried to get in, but my parents made too much, so I didn't qualify.

Did they share their significant income with me? Hah NO. Did they contribute to any college? $2000. Oh wait, that was from my grandpa's will.

My income was like $15000/yr, from working at a Subway. Real big wage earner. But nope, my worthless parents made bank so I didn't get any help to succeed.

Fuck the whole "well your parents are rich so you also must be".
I think it was more of a joke
SLS is about maintaining the ability of the US to build rocket engines like the RS-25 and those massive SRBs. The Government is worried about waking up some morning and China has leapfrogged us to the Moon and it'll take 20 years for us to institutionally remember how to get back there. And SpaceX has not yet demonstrated the ability to land humans on the Moon while NASA has. They're making sure that we can definitely still use big dumb stupid expensive technology to get there. If Starship works they may wind up pivoting away from SLS in the future, but then SpaceX will also get to take its pick up the remains of that program and their engineers (if they aren't already benefiting from a lot of cross-pollination).
You’re looking at it
Indexing the copyrighted works is rehashing it. You're rehashing it into a different format that is more easily searchable by a computer. But that work is still based on other people's copyrighted works.
Oops. That's a big one. To appreciate the size of Evergrande is hard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergrande_Group
SUSE to Go Private
I figure it’s a hard-to-detect bias. You see a video of the 90’s you know you’re looking on at the 90’s. You unconsciously know your reference frame to the 90’s.
Not sure why this is presented as so conclusive, the sample they have exhibits none of the floating properties and the recipe is different. Of course testing whatever this is isn't a superconductor.
I think taxes are out of scope but I do not think knowing medications are out of scope. I would call the medications reasonable and the taxes unreasonable. Maybe that is the limit?
So not a printing press but a bookstore? Society seems to have somehow outlasted Barnes & Noble.
Crew-1 and Crew-2 happened before September 2021.
1) Yes. Handwriting is one of the option to input an image, there's an image to latex conversion happening under the hood

2) It should but it doesn't seem to be consistent and it often just solves the exercise step by step. I'll try to tweak the system prompt to enforce a step by step feedback loop style
Completely terrible reasons. There is no good justification for SLS.
This is incorrect. If my income and expenses both increase by 10x, my savings increase by 10x. After just a few years of saving, I have the option of moving somewhere cheaper and living like a king.

It's not like your savings and investments are adjusted for the cost of living when you move.

In the extreme case, you can earn as much as possible and accumulate enough to live on indefinitely in a cheap country. This is obviously better than just earning a low salary in the cheap country for the same amount of time.
Google is combatting the Quantum Apocalypse with a new Chrome crypto feature
Well, vanity URLs have been a thing for a while now. E.g. lobste.rs.
Sigma Opens Up About Lens Design, a Problem with Gear Reviews, and More
The guys on the left to Tom Petty don't look as old. It has to do a lot with genetics
Thank you, that is the site. I don't know where I got "Byzantine failures" from.
The values system we have is very different compared to the 30s or 40s or even the 60s. The idea of a society where we all contribute and all benefit is dead and gone. The media has given up all pretense of caring and now preaches consumerism over god and country. Compromise is a sign of weakness. As is empathy for fellow citizens. In short, a big enough percentage of the people today don't want to improve the lives of their fellow americans, and they elect politicians to actively make this place worse.

Many of our "intractable" issues are policy issues and are completely fixable within 1 or 2 generations and honestly have always been fixable.
Show HN: Raiseto – find and share good ideas
That's wild. The photos on her instagram look like something out of a '90s UNICEF commercial.
Slack is getting a major redesign to look more like Microsoft Teams
They don't mean that people look like they are from an older time. They're talking about the age people look (as in this person looks like they're 30 or this other person looks like they're 70).

Physical aging features like wrinkles and spots on their skin.
Both are factual.

Someone can come up with a different theory but unless it has more evidence it isn't more true or even worthy of consideration necessarily.

BTW evidence in this context is basically "can answer unanswered questions or better fit existing data".

Most notably you would need to test your alternative. After all countless tests have been done on evolution.

There is no need to hedge bets on what is true. Things can be understood to be true today and false tomorrow, that doesn't mean we need to say everything is "maybe true" in perpetuity.
> The GP post was talking about directly editing HTML

This is still what you're doing with any components, only the CSS is localized to the component vs. its usage.
If they don't start serious habitat development until Starship is ready, then, Starhip will be decades old by the time anybody is ready to make a Mars colony. Besides the structure of the habitats themselves, there a ton of technology that would need to be developed first. Life support equipment and systems, space suits, vehicles, any sort of plan to produce food. Nobody is seriously developing this stuff, you have a few million dollars here and there thrown at university projects but no serious investment. It would take a Manhattan Project sized commitment, but who would pay for that? Not Elon Musk, he says that he assumes other people will. There's no money in Mars colonization, it's a pipe dream for young dreamers.

> To add to that, it arguably doesn't make sense to develop habitats at all unless something similar to Starship is flying.

It doesn't make sense developing Starship unless you have paying customers lined up. Launching satellite constellations is a market that actually exists, Mars colonization doesn't and won't for decades at least, by which time Starship will likely be obsolete anyway.

Furthermore, you're ignoring the part where Starship isn't a Mars rocket and doesn't even resemble a Mars rocket. If Elon Musk had never spoken of Mars, there would be zero reason to suspect that Starship was meant to be a Mars rocket. His words alone are the basis for this belief. How much are his words actually worth to you?
For those wondering "then what the heck is Agile?", it is this: https://agilemanifesto.org/
You don’t have to go very far back for this hypothesis to fail. Consider that on the classic American show the Golden Girls, a sitcom of seniors, the youngest of them was 53 (played by a 51 year old actress.)

We simply dress and act differently in our older age these days.
Leslie didn't steal his Turing award ;)
Dating apps in both southern europe as well as northern europe show such a massive difference in how old people look compared to their actual ages.
We used to be limited by what our stomachs could carry, but every leap in technology amounted to storing up more food and resources for later, or consuming them conspicuously for social status, particularly to attract mates. So nowadays not even a few lifetimes of wealth (tens of millions of dollars) is enough to sate.
Syntactics and Semantics
or a stay at home mom
Removing risk by de-leveraging. ie 'fessin up your property is worth significantly less than you said, and so you've ripped billions out of the worth of investment because you bankrolled the entire thing on debt.

Every Listed Property Trust in the city centre of every covid affected city in every economy was writing down book value as soon as work from home got real. Up to 30% (my estimate, gut feel) of the value of commercial office property has evaporated judging by bums-on-seats income projection. There isn't the growth you expected so value imputed in leveraged property investment isn't there.

This should echo around the world. About the only insulated cities are the ones with heritage height limits because they don't have the massive vacancy rate rise compared to high rise.

If you think this isn't a big deal, wait until managed investment funds declare their annuals. Everyone has some property exposure. Google, Apple, you name it, will have money in LPT, either directly for funds management or indirectly in weird tax efficient contra deals over office leases.

Some people want to jump off a cliff. Some want to bleed the loss out over time hoping for a way to buy out in some future market rise. Some like the Chinese giants have the government breathing down their necks.

The entire listed property trust model is predicated on perpetual future growth in office space.
I didn’t and when the AIs need rights, I’m sure they just take them
Distance is almost completely irrelevant for comparing launch vehicles.

Also, Falcon 9 has delivered multiple payloads to lunar orbit. Examples are ispace's Hakuto-R Mission 1, SpaceIL's Beresheet, and South Korea's Danuri. In interplanetary space, the Double Asteroid Redirection Test was launched on a Falcon 9.
You think half of all top websites contain svgs?
I prefer Robert Schoch's theory that it was a solar outburst (aka micro-nova) rather than a comet that dramatically warmed the entire Earth.

(he was also on Joe Rogan)
Can you cite what in the article gave you the impression this had anything to do with YouTube and not the advertisers themselves? Because from what can tell, YouTube is relevant here only from a clickbait headline standpoint. The real issue, I guess, is that the websites themselves had tracking which was tied to the YouTube ad. I don't see what this has to do with alphabet.
Rust macros are a crutch to work around the language's shortcomings. It's just a better crutch than C's.
> I think you've missed my point: San Francisco is a poor choice for the earliest market of Cruise.

There are plenty of regulators and people who's entire job is to figure out if it makes sense in their city or not. Those people are in charge of making that decision for San Francisco, not you.
How many hundreds of thousands dead before something moves from the "moral panic" category to "justifiable panic" category?
ChatGPT can't meaningfully expose probabilities. The problems related to hallucinating would make them all super muddy.
It's a couple of mm too wide, it fits at an angle. But it works well.
What else could he say?

His customers/employees will decide.
You prompted it in exactly the wrong way. It also says:

> It's important to note that the concept of Bio-Resonance Farming is speculative
Society grants ownership to incentives creation. Not out of respect for Justice or fairness as your argument implies. AI doesn’t need an incentive to create and the marginal cost to create goes down almost infinitely once the AI training cost has been recouped.
i believe you've misinterpreted the meaning of the word progressive here to refer to political progressives, rather than simply just "gradual/ongoing" which is what the use of it here suggests to me personally
competitive de-planing would be an amazing sport
i know of two so called millions of dollars success stories first hand

both shared the same elements:

- theft of IP or sales leads

- unlikely events that lined up (luck) which made the business a success
I produce emissions from electricity, car, airplanes, etc. My stocks do not produce emissions. My emissions wouldn't go down if I sold all my stocks.

There are two ways to account for emissions and this study uses the wrong one. The first, the one that is produces the quote about how a few companies produce all the emissions, attributes emissions to the producer. The second attributes them to the consumer because they consume the energy.

The CO2 from gallon of gas isn't made by Exxon (excluding all the production) but from burning it in my car. The CO2 for electricity is produced at the plant but it is being used in my AC.
I'd guess they're trying to highlight a self selection bias in the current genetic database being built by vanity concerns rather than clinical.
This is also an issue for student loans...
In which way? Are the northerners older-looking because their skin can't handle the sun? Are the southerners older-looking because they get more sun?
What I do is browse aimlessly through RH until see a tag like "Industrials". Then, I click this and I can see a list of like 50 companies that do all things yellow-square in sim city.

It's like fish in a barrel if you have patience to sort through the information and type fake contact info into investor web forms to get at presentation materials.

You definitely don't need a Bloomberg terminal subscription to do this stuff.
Only if there was someone there that I had already worked with. Actually, though, it normally involved a sort of introduction structured as an interview, in which I would talk to somebody else that I had not worked with before. I did once get re-hired at a place I had already worked, without even that.

It's a bit unusual, but then most interviews are not very good ways of figuring out if the person will work out anyway, so perhaps it's a good sign? Or else they're desperate.
A delightful post and there is a very decent message in amongst the happy puppy grows up stuff:

"If I had to do it all again, I would have immediately sat down with each team member individually to hear their thoughts about:"

Do that and then do it again collectively and do it repeatedly. People need to be needed. People need to be valued. People who feel needed and valued tend to perform best. You don't have to be best mates or even like each other - that's tricky but do able.
The industry of writing thinkpieces about housing is bigger than the industry of building it.
I didn't say you're pro-slavery so please don't martyr yourself.

I said you bucked this person's assumption of "all people with morals believe a slave is bad"

Otherwise you could obviously moralize the more complex concept of slavery based on objective reality by observing "more slavery == more slaves"; slavery is bad QED

—

Morality is concerned with examining if something is good or bad. So if all people with morals (regardless of what those are) find a concept to be either good or bad... then it might as well exist outside of the purview of morality for the purpose of debate. That's the metaphorical "floor of morality"

My point is normally you need nuanced examples to prove that things "on the floor" can still be moralized, like murder vs murder in self-defense.

What you proved is that there are also people willing to moralize concepts as simple as "slaves are bad" (vs "slavery is bad")

—

In doing so you demonstrated why when someone tries to moralize things that I assumed to be "on the floor", or universally bad: I just discard their opinion without consideration.

If you ask me "why do you think slaves are bad", I'll mostly say "I just do, and I don't wish to entertain arguments otherwise". I see it as being pragmatic, but some may consider it fragile.

It's just, I'm a fairly introspective and have had a varied enough life that I trust my intuition that anyone who can't reach the floor of my morality is not worth convincing.
Yea!! I’m curious if he met a blonde peer named Andrea? Probably same age as him.
I like using arrow-macros (threading macros) myself;

(-> report
revised
revised
revised
revised
revised
revised
revised)
Seems like they’d have to be counted multiple times between the oil company investors, the airline investors, and the passengers, etc. Disclaimer though I haven’t read the article, but I am curious how they do the accounting.

Edit: or are they considering the entity that owns the fuel that’s being burned? But the whole issue is that the carbon is an externality of other economic processes. I could offer to accept ownership of all carbon emitted by any company for a nominal fee and become the world’s only polluter according to that methodology.
> According to him, one of the cables had been dragged "over a kilometer"

Undersea landslides can go for over a hundred kilometers and can last hours.

So I'm not sure why this is impressive or in question?

It doesn't seem unlikely to me.
your gillette ups neurologist?
How have you written nearly 500 words and still not make any salient or cogent points? Try making a good faith argument and maybe we can have a discussion.
I wouldn’t call that avoiding the problem. No one expects oil and gas companies to shut down until we have something to replace them. Renewables haven’t been very effective yet (just look at Germany) so we still need oil and gas companies to function (eg just stop oil all using iPhones and Macs).

I’m guessing you still use products made from fossil fuels: would you say that you are avoiding the problem? Or would you say you a just being pragmatic? It’s easy to point fingers but unless you are living in a hut in the woods you will still be contributing to GHG.
Who makes the game?
A blood factor can rejuvenate the aging brain
I have zero html attachments.

(These emails are not marketing emails which I don't get, they all relate to orders and shipping)
Russia fines Google $32,000 for videos about the conflict in Ukraine