skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your faith in your government is commendable. But doesn't China indeed have ways to rendition fugitives? There have been some legitimate cases, so I don't know what you're talking about when you say it can't do so.

Also, this will probably come across as callous or obtuse, or even deceptive or arrogant, so I'm sorry, but, no offence, yet you do sound a little bit concerned with the present situation, and your optimism, while seemingly bullet-proof does come off a little bit forced. I only mention this because I'm curious if you are want to share more about the zeitgeist there...are people worried? Bullish? Uncertain?
I recently encountered a situation:

"My husband and I are both managers in tech and each make $600k a year"

First, good for them, I guess, but also people constantly conflate stock-based compensation (which is compensation but very, very rarely a fixed rate of income) or windfall years or capital gains and hand wave them all together as "salary."

In the scenario I encountered, the couple lucked out in they both work at the same place and the company stock has appreciated significantly, but what wasn't said is that they cannot sustain that income beyond one year.

It's quite possible to make over $1M in a year, at least on paper -- I've done it a few times in my career. Making that much year over year without any windfalls is certainly more challenging. I'd never state "yeah I make over $1M/year" in a windfall year.
Sahara to UK (or equivalent) is a necessary, but not sufficient, early step to learning how to do a full-scale planetary grid.

It will highlight many of the engineering issues and some of the political ones, and ideally will seem like an overpriced mess when we reach the level where we even want to optimise design and process for a full-size grid.

For a true planet scale grid, think half a trillion dollars of aluminium, 3.75 years of current annual worldwide production: its doable, just not what you should jump into without smaller scale experiments.
Walmart literally has small grocery stores:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Walmart+Neighborhood+Marke...
> Please, I thought somebody will mention some arcane, rare topics that self-taught person may have no opportunity to hear about, but definitely not those really popular topics.

Agreed. These are it something many “self taught” developers I know have never heard of. For fucks sale with all the complaining about things like leetcode and other interview styles. do you seriously believe self taught people have never heard of these things?

Unfortunately, it seems in recent years “self taught” became synonymous with “some guy who decided to do a bootcamp because he heard there was money in learning to code”.
yeah im from the south and there is definitely a level of up-front-ness that i'm not sure the parent comment is talking about. like a level of exuberance and get-it-out-ness that often borders on belligerence

"yall doin okay?"
> Not to mention that you don't have to hire for the additional language for the dev team.

Or maybe hire people who can code in more than one framework.
Guessing OP is a (Disco Eylisem)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disco_Elysium] fan.
I tossed about 18 months' worth of work on the frontend for our upcoming app, and started over.

It's been about eight months since, and the new app is really good. It will be a hundred times better than what we had.

Since we didn't do the MVP thing (which pretty much forces a "sunk cost"), we could do this.
Jamon like most other Spanish hams (even the most expensive kind) has added nitrites. AFAIK Prosciutto Di Parma is the only expensive ham that's dry cured without any nitrites or other additives/preservatives besides salt.
Given who invented it, Go can be thought of as, "What C might have been if we could have done it."

Go really is in many ways more similar to early C in spirit than modern C is.
> If Comer's claims can be substantiated

They can’t, though. That's the point.

> It's hard to imagine that Comer has completely fabricated all of this as well.

It's not hard to imagine. At all. In fact, given the violation of norms in his Comer has been conducting the investigation (if it is actually occurring at all, and the information through different channels raises real questions about that) makes it hard to imagine anything else.

> It would have to be a lot of really huge misunderstandings.

Your devotion to the assumption of good faith when people repeatedly show their bad faith is... well, something.
Backed With $245M, Teamshares Buys Small Businesses, Boosts Employee Ownership
When there is so much fat cattery in the private sector, it is no longer more efficient.
You should feel that all the time.

But it’s not a circle, it’s an arc. If it were a circle, running as fast as you can in one direction would bring you back around to the former. Instead we hit the end of the swing and backpedal until we remember why we were going this direction in the first place.
Haven't read it yet. I guess I should.
Is that also true if you are (or are traveling with) a woman? I'm not much of a motel person and am mostly working with stereotypes here[1], but a cheap motel does not strike me as the place where a woman can safely return home by herself late in the evening.

I guess, cheap AirBnbs may be at similar locations, but that doesn't seem to be necessarily (or usually) true. And often you can't quite figure out how unsafe the place is ahead of time, so you rent something and roll with it, but that's a discussion for another time.

[1] Then again, so is everyone else. A guy a few comments down presented statistics, which were somehow refuted trough the careful deployment of a stereotype.
https://archive.ph/3AYUF
The investment isn't the problem, the profits are. We clearly could've only spent $1.3B for the same outcome.
If it was a joke, my bad !
Moderna's only commercial product is the COVID-19 vaccine[1]. But hey, you were told to get the exact number of doses necessary to ensure the survival of humanity and no more than that!

1. https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/0001... (see page 59).
What happened? It seems to be working now, maybe it was some API unstability
I'm not sure it's a trick.

It's just a thing IMO.
One of the many reasons i had told my SO that we have to leave CA before having any kids.
> EDR to catch DNS logging

What's an EDR? And what's the link between phishing and DNS?

> like okta so you can quickly kill sessions for the breeches user

I can the see the usefulness of the ability to kill compromises session, but if your user get his Okta account pwnd, then the attacker has access to the entirety of what the user had access to without needing to do any additional work, which is the worse possible scenario. And unless the user has the right reaction (seeking help ASAP), your kill switch isn't going to save you.

Also, MFA isn't really helping against phishing: the user is going to give the MFA code to the attacker anyway…
As a writer myself: I have actual experts review what I write. That's about the best you can do.

I think I read that The Big Bang Theory makes sure all the science is accurate. I wouldn't know.
"Millimeter Wave" machines are NOT "backscatter x-ray" machines. Millimeter Wave is a radio-wave device.
We should just go back to like 80% tax rate after $100M income.
I have ~1000 accounts, ~200 of which are used for work occasionally. Their 2FA recovery methods vary, and some have no recovery method. I'd like to say my wallet is not large enough for the printed codes, but only about 5 accounts even offer backup codes, considerably fewer than the number of 2FA accounts.

Besides, my last Gmail account for work appeared to be locked to my phone and didn't accept backup codes, and was OAuth master to a number of other accounts.

(For real: I lost access to that Google account permanently when my phone screen stopped working due to an internal fault. It wasn't really a problem and I didn't pursue it fully because I left the job soon after anyway, but the fact I couldn't regain access during that time despite copying the broken phone's content to a new device which successfully transferred the 2FA codes for all other accounts, was striking. It's why I don't use Google for id when there's another option. I tend to use GitHub for id at the moment.)
Potential last gasps before people finally lose interest in high performance ICE engines altogether, and these show pieces lose their lustre to equally powerful (and far more customizable) electric drives.

This is my prediction - electric vehicles won't achieve that level of following until they start producing similar ego-stroking show pieces. They are already in the works.

Don't get me wrong. The car is pretty awesome. But eventually this genre will be considered dirty and old fashioned. Just like stretched out big v-twin motorbikes with ape hangers.
Not for sustained minutes, a few miliseconds.
Don't get me started on that one. Corporate personhood...
Can I? I opened https://www.vim.org/docs.php but something bad happened to it and it displays in microscopic font for me.

After an hour wading through the docs I found a mention of evim:

---

This manual is about using Vim in the normal way. There is an
alternative called "evim" (easy Vim). This is still Vim, but used in
a way that resembles a click-and-type editor like Notepad. It always
stays in Insert mode, thus it feels very different. It is not
explained in the user manual, since it should be mostly self
explanatory. See |evim-keys| for details.

---

That's what you mean?
Elegance of code is subjective and developer productivity is more a trait of a developer than a language (which means it is inherently subjective, e.g. in my case Python is among the languages I was least productive in; I find myself much more productive in Scala, Kotlin, Rust and even R for statistics).
> to give them to adults seems a little infantilizing

The 'mi casa es su casa / make yourself at home' concept is perfectly normal and won't cause offense to anyone, surely?
But also, methane. Maximised inputs, some very bad externalised costs. (Yes, fixable, no, not fixed yet at any sort of scale)
I see what you're getting at. My intention was to highlight that I don't believe Silicon Valley culture is synonymous with Bay Area culture. In my interactions with individuals who were raised in Northern California or even the Bay Area, I’ve seen a lot of “guess” culture fairly similar to the PNW.

To phrase it differently, a significant number of the people you’re thinking of probably wont establish lasting roots in the Bay and thus wouldn't be passing down that culture to the subsequent generation of Bay Area youngsters.

It's a thought-provoking query indeed though, pondering what characterizes the "prototypical San Franciscan" and how that might evolve over time!
It actually does have error handling. It uses a Result type

type ReaderIOEither[A any] RE.ReaderIOEither[context.Context, error, A]

In fact the test code you linked actually even does a check on the result:

assert.Equal(t, E.Of[error](count), result())

In order to avoid all those excessive functions and 'silly' constants, Go needs to support const and variadic generics like C++ does. Then the API would become quite clean.

I am not supporting the use of this library in prod code used in a large team - but its OK for small tools where one needs to iterate quickly. Folks familiar with FP constructs (esp users of fp-ts) would follow this code almost immediately. Basically the dirtiness and pain (most of it) has been encapsulated into the library.
I'm not worried about it, this is probably some of the best 1.7 billion dollars the federal government has ever spent.

If the money came with strings, maybe the US government would have a little more money and Moderna stock holders a little less, or maybe we wouldn't have a Moderna. And the upside of the former is so smaller compared to the downside of the latter I think in this case we made the right choice.
> In the MIPS case defining that behavior would force the compiler to generate strictly signed instructions for signed values and define how the runtime platform handles these interrupts,

I respectfully disagree: in this particular scenario, it's enough for the compiler vendor to write "generates an interrupt on overflow" with no indication of what the handling should be, and still be well within implementation-defined behaviour.

After all, the standard specifies what `raise()` does, and what `signal()` does, but doesn't specify how the runtime is going to handle `raise(signum)` when the program has not yet called `signal(signum, fptr)`.

This scenario you presented displays exactly why UB should be replaced with IB in the standard. I've yet to see one good reason (including performance reasons) for why the dereferencing of a NULL pointer (for example) cannot be documented for the implementation.

With UB, we have real-world examples of a NULL pointer dereference causing compilers to omit code resulting in a program that continued to run but with security implications. If changed to IB, the compiler would be forced to emit that code and let the dereference crash the program (much better).
It will be harder to get away with crimes if everyone's DNA is on file.

Of course if you recently visited the place where a crime took place you might also be falsely accused.

I suppose they could also use it to track your movements if there was some way to massively collect DNA samples from the environment.
The notion of 3 travelers on window, center, and aisle being OK to wait through FIVE flushes (aisle, opposite aisle, center, opposite center, window) to reconnect -- and the notion this is "enlightened" -- I can't.

The notion that ALL sets of 2+ travelers now have to wait at the end of the gangway just inside the terminal, the disaster that would create at the gate, is just kicking the can off the plane in a way that doesn't actually help the next passengers get on any sooner. The gate -- and all gates -- would be a disaster.
FWIW the data agrees with you, for milder cases of anxiety and depression, which often correlate with interpersonal issues, talk therapy (e.g. dissecting childhood trauma) is much less effective than cognitive behavioral therapy (analyzing behavioral and emotional patterns, trying to catch and redirect cycles of thought and action that lead to negative outcomes).
> There are multiple operators

This is because there's just a lot more rail. Tokyo has 3x the density of stations (0.61 per mile vs 0.2) and 10x the amount of track (2929 miles vs 248) as NYC. Tokyo is just a much much bigger city.

> You need to either purchase a special card from a desk, or pay cash

Japan has been on the train card system for over 20 years. The same card works for all the operators. You can put it on your phone (if you have a Japanese phone). People don't use credit cards in Japan at nearly the same frequency we do in the West, so the train card acts as a debit card in a way.

Buying a card is slightly more inconvenient than using a contactless credit card, I'll give you that. But you get cleaner, safer more timely trains, way more stations, and way more destinations.
Samsung Notes Windows update arbitrarily limited to Galaxy Books
Already have a phone and a tablet from Samsung. That's what made the application nice. I don't get why Samsung thinks people are going to buy yet another Windows machine when the one they're on works perfectly fine.
Star Trek Discovery: "the Probe used a SQL Injection attack"
"What are the tasks they perform to get there?"

Meetings. Lots of meetings.
I love how you are defining these racism rules on the fly. It really shows how you are just trying to rationalize your hatred.
Eh. The existence of Rust (and Zig, to a lesser extent) prove that you can, in fact, have both: Highest performance and safe, properly error checked code without any sort of UB.

UB is used for performance optimizations, yes, but all of these difficult to diagnose UB issues and bugs happen because C++ makes it laughably easy to write incorrect code, and (as shown by Rust) this is by no means a requirement for fast code.
That is usually a myth.

From the people that were there at the time.

"Oh, it was quite a while ago. I kind of stopped when C came out. That was a big blow. We were making so much good progress on optimizations and transformations. We were getting rid of just one nice problem after another. When C came out, at one of the SIGPLAN compiler conferences, there was a debate between Steve Johnson from Bell Labs, who was supporting C, and one of our people, Bill Harrison, who was working on a project that I had at that time supporting automatic optimization...The nubbin of the debate was Steve's defense of not having to build optimizers anymore because the programmer would take care of it. That it was really a programmer's issue.... Seibel: Do you think C is a reasonable language if they had restricted its use to operating-system kernels? Allen: Oh, yeah. That would have been fine. And, in fact, you need to have something like that, something where experts can really fine-tune without big bottlenecks because those are key problems to solve. By 1960, we had a long list of amazing languages: Lisp, APL, Fortran, COBOL, Algol 60. These are higher-level than C. We have seriously regressed, since C developed. C has destroyed our ability to advance the state of the art in automatic optimization, automatic parallelization, automatic mapping of a high-level language to the machine. This is one of the reasons compilers are ... basically not taught much anymore in the colleges and universities."

-- Fran Allen interview, Excerpted from: Peter Seibel. Coders at Work: Reflections on the Craft of Programming
If you take out all the “script” legacy (type coercion which was common for scripting languages when JS came out, the initial lack of a module system which led to all kinds of hacks, the scope of var declaration, etc), JavaScript and its prototype based approach is really good.

In fact I wish that constructor functions, and the class keyword never existed.

You can do the same with Object.create and a function closure, isn’t more verbose and it fits better with the mixed functional/oop approach of the language.
Fractures are very rare in volleyball. High impact sports such as weightlifting are critical for bone health and building skeletal muscle. Lack of bone density and insufficient muscle are certainly more dangerous than an occasional x-ray.

https://peterattiamd.com/ama37/

I do agree with avoiding sports that have a high risk of concussions due to head impacts.
Not sure if that's what the OP meant by "real" -- both of the Safeway entries list nitrites in the ingredients, and the Vande Rose Farms item contains celery powder (which is "uncured" by USDA's definition, but contains nitrites as well).
>Homeland Security made it illegal //

How do they stop sales of scanning equipment to people who want to do testing? You could easily buy them abroad, and do tests abroad.

Also, could you cite the US Code on this please. Thanks.
No. I'm going to blame the manufacturers. We can have small trucks, American manufacturers refuse to release them.

It's not like they can't do anything about the highly profitable situation they lobbied themself into.
You can architect it in a way that let's the person choose what they want to share with 3rd parties. The most basic is just, this is an actual human. Then make it illegal for companies to share tracking data based on your passport id with anyone.

You can also architect it so that the government doesn't know who is trying to authenticate you.

It does prevent you from making multiple accounts with the same company though.
It’s weird since their homepage already showed suggested videos based on who you subscribed to. Not sure why they’d kill their metrics over watch history that you know they totally track anyways.
> Also, compilers don't reason about code the same way humans do. They apply a large number of small transformations, each of these transformations is very reasonable and it is their combination that results in "absurd" optimization results.

So true.

It baffles me how sometimes I hear colleagues of mine just "assuming" that the compiler will deal with something. Something that does require a really high level reasoning to come true.

It's absurd.
But in that case, it's not going to be wrapping either. We'll just read beyond the end of the buffer, which a bounds check should catch.

Or perhaps I'm not thinking of the specific sequence that would 1) not wrap during modifying index and 2) not hit bounds check after.

It would need to be a requirement that compilers can't upcast all your ints to 64 bit ones, do all the math, and then write them back - would need specific instructions for each size.
The classic one was "tomsrtbt" (http://www.toms.net/rb/).
like x > 2147483547u in this case?
He deserves it. Basically one of the people pushing mRNA since 2011, more than 10 years ago. Regardless of the politics behind it (I'm particularly anti-covid vaccine myself after the dust has settled), it's indisputable that this technology has a pathway that works and could solve many diseases in the future.
I agree totally and I've been thinking along this track lately too. I keep being surprised by the extent of this apathy -- it seems to show up in all industries and countries, though the degree varies a little. It feels totally alien to me -- I'd hate to be that indifferent to what I do, and if I got to that point I'd try to change jobs.

> film of careless inertia covering the whole world.

Great phrase, by the way.
It's all just a coincidence that this investigator tried to investigate Burisma for corruption, and Burisma attempted to buy access to Joe Biden through Hunter Biden, who was only selling the 'appearance' of access. Which means Burisma was obviously corrupt for attempting to buy said access even if it was in fact an illusion and they were being conned.

And it's just a coincidence that Biden claimed he didn't know his son was on the board of Burisma when it was later proved he did know that. He just, forgot, I guess.
Regulated, you say?

Take a look at regulated monopolies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government-granted_monopoly

The issue is ... they are granted exclusive rights by the local government.
So named because it's where they keep the financial services people, who are now the only ones who can afford to make noise at 3AM.

Fun fact: if you head east from there, things get pretty damn ghetto pretty quickly. Like, you don't want your car to break down, "projects"-level ghetto. Then it all fades away to the peculiar English joy of Essex. But make no mistake, there's some serious ghetto really close to the money.

Note also, this is the area that was bombed most heavily during the war due to its position to the east of town. The German bombers would drop their loads and turn around ASAP to minimize time exposed to AA fire. A septuagenarian I know who grew up there described it as a child's playground composed of a wonderland of overgrown, bombed out buildings.