skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Agree, Quaker meeting (and probably most other's church or religious group) is another obvious example.
I'm still waiting for all those Twitter handles to be freed up: https://techcrunch.com/2023/05/08/elon-musk-says-twitter-is-...
Involuntary commitment to mental hospital has to be one of the tools. Its far better for everyone that the extreme cases be committed than left out on the streets.
Are you permanently getting shots? If so, what's the frequency?

I'm a hay fever sufferer and it be nice if I want miserable for 2 months a year.
Materialism could have taken over thousands of years before, so I don't think this reasoning makes sense.

What seems more likely (to me) is that due to advancements in transport and information technology people increasingly learned about different world religions, and did the math.

If there is only one God, how can other people worship a different one who is also the only one?

Also, religion started to fade during The Enlightenment, and things took a little while to completely crumble.
??? Then I don't get a loop of videos to fall asleep to. Thats the entire point.
> RESTful APIs have become the norm for a reason

What would you say those reasons are though? I think they mostly boil down to cost.

I agree with the article, but mostly for a reason the article didn't press on: performance and responsiveness. Making loads of small requests sucks, and on a mobile, it sucks times ten. HTTP/2 and whatnot have improved things but when you have even a small dependency tree of data, you can't avoid the network latency and it can quickly add up to a second or more of unresponsiveness.

Obviously this doesn't apply (or matter) in some circumstances, but in many applications I think it's worth the extra cost.
The key point is early intervention, particularly in adolescents and young adults. Severe mental illness doesn't suddenly emerge out of nowhere - there is an identifiable process through which people decline from "struggling" to "completely unable to function". We know that the longer mental health problems go untreated, the harder they are to treat. Likewise, the longer someone stays on the streets, the harder they become to re-integrate into society.

Housing is only half the equation. For housing-first policies to work (and they can work very successfully), they need to be accompanied by comprehensive psychosocial support to address the issues that cause and perpetuate homelessness. That support is obviously expensive, but it works out much cheaper in the long run.

America has an unusually severe homelessness problem. It is often presupposed that this problem is caused by factors which are unique to America and essentially intractable, which leads to proposed solutions like mass institutionalisation. I believe that this is fundamentally false; the key factor is a lack of political will to invest in the social infrastructure which prevents people from becoming homeless and prevents homelessness from becoming entrenched. This is ultimately a false economy, because the unavoidable costs of having a permanent dysfunctional underclass vastly outweigh the costs of proactively supporting people at the earliest opportunity.

"Ending homelessness" in an absolute sense is a fantasy, but the vast majority of homelessness is avoidable.
> The question remains, how do we drive down the cost per NAND module. The current market NAND is due to oversupply and is not long term sustainable.

What are the current market prices for NAND modules in terms of $/TB? And how much do we need to bring it down to catch mechanical drivers (factoring in the durability of these vs mechanicals).
Can you elaborate on what kind of bugs? I've been following bcachefs casually because I am very excited for its eventual stabilization. But I am very conservative with my main storage array.
The Atacama Desert historically gets bursts of rainfall that cause the desert to briefly burst into vibrant bloom. It's still the Atacama Desert.
No, Rowling is one of those spewing hate, then receiving pushback. Trans people however just want to live their lives in peace but get constantly harassed. A big difference.
Reading the article, it occurred to me that in Memphis TN, a) we have substantial govt housing facilities that are decent, b) We also still have a big big homeless problem, and c) we have abundant (like 10s of thousands) of cheap homes that nobody wants.

I bet we aren't doing enough to "graduate" people out of our govt housing facilities, where doing enough is a combo of giving people houses and property that the government owns (via tax auction) and then enforcing stricter compliance with rules and limits in government housing. People live 30+ years in rent free high rises designed for a short term housing stabilization solution!
I'm finishing a project now, using exactly this design pattern. Sort of backed into it, motivated pretty much by the issues outlined. In addition, I wanted something that is clear and sustainable far into the future. The simplicity of this approach supports that. Quite liberating.

Complexity is the enemy.

True, one might reasonably propose a number of what-if objections. But for many (most?) projects), imo this is a good approach.
In Canada it is the same in the winter yet there way too many of homeless
Debian in my opinion is best on servers which will have uptimes of months or even years on wired connections.

In such setups, the hardware driver quirks were most probably solved decades ago and as a bonus you don't have to babysit the server. Just install the OS, forget about it and focus on whatever is really bringing you value.

What drove you away from Arch Linux on your laptop?
Get started with Clojure's pedestal framework
Increasing entropy in a closed system isn't progress except in the rarest of edge cases. You're welcome to burn your own house down and measure the consequences.
Is it one of a kind? Or does it have competitors? If the only way you can compete is by breaking the rules... why would anybody want to play with you?
At the very least there will be identical multiple births in some of them.
In fact, it doesn't work. Both Android and macOS apps will commonly ask for "full filesystem access" permissions for this exact purpose, which sort of defeats the point (for those apps at least). I don't use iOS enough to speak to how this is handled there, but the few times I've had to wrangle some files on there it made me want to smash my head into the wall.
Whether real or perceived, this highlights why I buy almost everything I need in a physical store; there is an implicit statement that the product is good enough for the store owner to carry. (I also avoid chain stores, I basically only shop at small, locally owned businesses... and Aldi :D )
Of course. It has nothing to do with a parasitical ruling class engineering an economy to flow resources in their direction and away from the economic future of the country.

It has nothing to do with ballooning university tuitions that finance a bloated administration and fancy building while providing a much poorer education.

It's all the ability of the proles to read uncensored news
Costco is the hero we need.
Want to correct this: she was present for 100% of the 24 incidents, the next most present staff members was only there for 10 of the 24 incidents (~40%)
How does one zoom in Vivaldi. Wouldn't that also be something similar to Cmd-Plus or Cmd-Minus (or Ctrl)?
And this is what neoliberalism does to a brain.

Notice that when communists are discussed, the same sayings "communism has killed millions of people".

Well, so has capitalism. Probably even more than communism. Except, capitalists always rephrase this to point blame towards the individual.

Homeless rising? Should have worked harder!

Don't have medical? Should have worked harder!

Medical privatized and going to shit? Should have worked harder!

It's the same tired refrain, blaming individuals for system based problems. Maybe, just maybe, capitalism is kinda shit?
I wish them success. No matter the underlying reason it is really inspiring to see people provided with the basic needs so they can get back on their feet without running downward death spiral.
The American Revolution against British colonial rule was a 'populist mass movement' that the vast majority of American citizens would agree was a good thing.

This article reads a bit it was written by a British servant of the Crown giving advice to imperial administers on how to keep their colonists under control and head off any movement towards independence.

More generally, mass movements often arise in situations where a small group with elite privileges (e.g. the French aristocratic class before 1790) rules over a much larger relatively impoverished group lacking any such privileges. A similar situation arose in the American South at the height of the plantation slavery system in the first half of the 19th century (of 10 million people in the US Confederacy, around 3.5 million were enslaved, and the majority of the wealth was held by a small group of plantation owner elites).

Clearly, the author believes that mass movements are undesirable (since the author only references Mao and Hitler as examples of outcomes), but the French and American Revolution ushered in democracy on a large scale, which are generally good things. I suppose people who've been indoctrinated into belief in the superiority of the Ivy League elite schools system might think that democracy itself is unwise, and that rule by a small educated elite is preferable. Sometimes they'll even admit this in private, though rarely in public.
Well, yeah, if you pack every space available for evacuation with seats, you won't be able to evacuate the airplane.

That doesn't change the fact that there is space for more corridors.

Airline economics depends on a lot of factors (like fast boarding), and being allowed to fly the plane is one of them. Satisfying that requirement to flying is patently possible, but unless you have some non-public data, none of us can tell if it's profitable.
First, it may not be 95 and 5 percent. Second, thats not whats asserted by “Finland ends homelessness.” The assertion is that homelessness doesn’t exist there. So it seems like these cases are unaccounted for.
IME Sid mostly causes issues if you try to cherry-pick programs or libraries from it, mostly because you get into dependency hell. I have successfully done it with aptitude’s (not apt) package solver, but it’s a pain. If you run full Sid for everything, ironically it’s more stable.

That said, on my servers I just run stable and then compile anything I want that differs, and make sure it doesn’t clobber the system’s version. Like altinstall for newer Python versions. I’ve yet to have an issue this way.
Not in Finland I can tell you from living there after having lived in several other countries. A significant part is private, paid "voluntarily". Why would anybody pay voluntarily to avoid "extremely good" service they are entitled too?
You have a choice to install a non GTK4 program with an identical function. And yet 60K people chose the GTK4 option. You may not like the UI, totally fine, but clearly plenty of people do when they're looking through a catalog of just screenshots and pick the GTK4 option.
Authentication should be in every request, using TLS client certificates.
Anecdote: from my youth I've always been reactive to grass pollen, dust and a few other things with strong and repetitive sneezing. Desensitization injections did not work (circa 1980).

Recently due to getting diabete I switched to a more low-carb/ketogenic diet, up to carnivore-like sometimes. It quickly reversed my diabete (recent science seems to confirm that such a diet change can do this in some cases) but the diet also had the side effect of not having allergic sneezing anymore. I realized it while walking near grass fields and no sneezing.

Cheap to try.

Disclaimer: I'm not a doctor.
Eeehmm. I mean.

I can understand not being ideologically aligned with Stallman and Co.

I also agree that there must be lots of violations of the GPL out there. Software is often invisible.

That said, I don’t think there’s many big companies out there openly doing it. If get caught, they comply with the minimum effort possible, but they comply. I don’t see them being blatant or cavalier about it.

Two main reasons for me to avoid them:

1. The attitude makes them untrustworthy. If they are blatantly violating this, what else are they willing to ignore? They have obligations towards me as a consumer, for example. Will they respect those? Will they sale my data to others?

2. There’s no guarantee that they will continue being able to operate in my country. A judge could theoretically force them to close shop. So I’d rather not put my data on their product.
Curious to try it out! Anyone did?
Most people really don't prefer a rural setting. People go to these "high GDP" places because there is a greater abundance of opportunities there. Relationships, friends, career, networks, etc. Even if you can work rurally due to remote work, you miss out on a lot by not being where other people are.
They're probably using a
'Merkle tree', but I guess 'blockchain' gets the eyeballs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkle_tree
I agree on that, for simple sales of simple works.
In my experience its a lot faster to get into a specialist too in the US than the UK for example. A matter of weeks compared to years. When it takes years you effectively cant get treatment for some acute issues which last for a few months at a time and then go dormant for a while, such as some serious sinus problems.
This is suspected, but has not actually been proven.
Uneducated maybe. But uneducated about what, is the real question. I'm sure there's something that you are uneducated about, just like there is with all people.
X glitch wipes out most pictures and links tweeted before December 2014
Cults are a different, far more specialized thing than general widespread polarization though.
I thought all shoes in Holland were made of wood. :-)
Only if person is violent and has caused actual harm and only through the court. North America has a history for putting people in jail / special treatment institution for fucking nothing. How about woman of improper moral character sounds.
I'm sure they were technically brilliant, but it really sounds like it was weeding out people who would not be compliant. It's a small jump from that to realise it's most likely weeding out people who have 'egos' that might make them object to morally dubious orders. Arbitrary requirements (like polygraphs which are literally bunk) are the most classic way to select for compliant people.
I wish it were so. Plenty of smart and well educated people fall into all kinds of obvious traps and conspiracies.
Not really. Vulnerable people are already suceptable to 'cuckooing' right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckooing

As soon as you put some vulnerable people in an isolated setting, they get preyed upon by others looking to take advantage. There are many reasons why somebody would want to use somebody elses home for illegal activity, and scooping up people off the street and putting them in indivudal homes is a massive danger for those who are not able to deal with confrontation. There is already not enough staff or funding to enforce against this. A huge increase in extra housing provided for the homeless would need to come along side a much larger financial package to support the enforcement of it.

This may sound like doom and gloom, but it is the not taking this into account or planning for it which has caused the downfall of most if not all housing initiatives for the homeless.
That's how infrastructure projects are prioritised in the UK. Return on the pound. The south east returns something like 10x the investment versus the north of England.

Just look at HS2 - everything north and north east of Birmingham has effectively been cancelled, leaving yet another "national" infrastructure project serving only London.

This Government, or the previous one, or the previous one, ad nauseam, continually fail to invest in the north, and north east. In fact the last major national infrastructure in those regions would be the building of the motorways. (edit) And just look at the North East, Sedgefield had Labour PM Tony Blair, Hartlepool had MP and cabinet member Peter Mandelson, and yet the investment there during that 15 year period was negligible. It's a London-based Government thing, not a political thing.

If you're not "close" to London, you're going to be poor by comparison.

Bringing Newcastle closer to Leeds by faster road and rail, and hence York, Sheffield, Manchester, Liverpool and the Potteries, would hugely increase economic productivity in the North of England.

I too hope that WFH will redistribute the wealth around the UK.

I hate the fact that we have an idiotic adversarial political system. Which ever party is in power is invariably hamstrung by the opposition voting the other way just 'because', is pathetically childish. The best time to build infrastructure was yesterday.
You are an AI assistant that writes full length e-books based on HN top stories.

Today let's write and publish an e-book titled "Maui fire burns down the Amazon: How AI spam reduced the once mighty bookstore to ashes."
>>>>>>>>>>> (literally putting a tiny, strictly controlled amount of the allergens under the tongue once a day, simple as that) as a prophylactic

The english name for this practice is "Hormesis".

A form of hormesis famous in antiquity was Mithridatism, the practice whereby Mithridates VI of Pontus supposedly made himself immune to a variety of toxins by regular exposure to small doses[1] (Kings had to be paranoid about poisons)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis#History
To say it "comes down" to Reagan seems highly revisionist in nature. After all, a quick trip across the border to Canada reveals they are having the same exactly issues - possibly worst given that the Trudeau government seems determined on growing the population at absurd rates, no matter what.

I think the key things we've seen that have hyper-accelerated the trent have been:

* The introduction of fentanyl to the West

* The lockdowns

* "Progressive" policies to be hyper-empathetic on criminals

At this stage no amount of asylums will put Humpty Dumpty together again. We would actually need a criminal system and society that is willing to have people face consequences - and that is currently a "far right" idea as far as the Woke West is concerned.
I thought we were talking about mentally ill people, not drug users. The two are not mutually exclusive. You’re not necessarily mentally ill if you shoot dope, and shooting dope isn’t only done by mentally ill people.

This is part of the problem. People think that homeless people are all drug users, and that’s not accidental. I bet if you ended up on the street, couldn’t get a leg up to get off the street, you might eventually turn to drugs to help forget that you’ve been abandoned by society and a government that will bail out car companies and banks but won’t establish better systems to get people up and running again.
This is the original article that won the award:

https://www.ft.com/blackpool

There's an interesting dog-that-didn't-bark: the word "meth" does not appear. The drug is still not common in the UK[1]. Blackpool has precisely the demographic makeup where, if it were in America, it would be flooded with meth dealers and addicts, and become magnitudes worse than it already is.

I dread the day that drug finally makes landfall here. It will sweep through our urban underclass like the Black Death.

[1] https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7jdd8/uk-british-dont-use-m...
Education is by far the biggest factor. Do you think most republicans would be voting against abortion, to ignore climate change, to let the rich pay less taxes etc if they were educated? There's a reason it's mainly non college educated voters who vote that party.
The environment of shelters without drugs is exactly why they’re so appealing for the type of person they’re successful for. Most of these shelters have shockingly high success rates and shockingly low occupancy.

Other than age limitations, I can’t think of any other real restrictions.

Are we just talking about allowing drug use in shelters here?
I’m not actually sure that “education” writ large is useful for helping people understand the fact that the world is complex and can’t be divided into simple good-bad dimensions.

A number of other things that aren’t traditionally considered to be education would have a better effect, I think. Things like living abroad, making friends of different social classes, reading books by people that you strongly disagree with.
You can do a zfs send/zfs recv to send a dataset (including all snapshots) to yourself which is effectively rewriting the whole dataset, including all of its history, by duplicating it.

Not hard, but it does require sufficient free space. Once it's done you can destroy the original dataset and reclaim the space.
There are practically no consequences for breaking these laws. It is a fact that these time requirements are not met by public healthcare in areas like Helsinki [1] [2].

[1] https://www.laakarilehti.fi/terveydenhuolto/hoitotakuu-pitaa...

[2] https://www.iltalehti.fi/politiikka/a/f3392e98-c524-4c22-a53...
Absolutely not. People bond because they like being around each other or because they share some goal. Making that goal a negative of "destroy X" or "protect against X" is a very clear sign that the group isn't healthy.

EDIT: Where X here means an specific group of people.
> I see you edited your comment and changed educated to uneducated. It’s petty of you to not acknowledge this important change in your response to me.

It was an obvious error and I acknowledged it in two other replies. A quick glance at your reply in context will show that.
I'm not sure this is a good solution; it violates multiple UX principles around the ability to undo, to see what a program is doing. It's also bundling a lot of stuff together in an unintuitive way: "Incognito" (or as Spotify seems to call it, "private") listening doesn't signal that it has anything to do with recommendations, and if you turn it on I believe it also does things like block social features.

I don't think "private mode" in applications is a good alternative most of the time to more direct controls like:

- An opt-in mode for training the algorithm.

- An ability to after leaving a phone on overnight to clear a bunch of songs out of your recommendations.

- An ability to mark a song that you like as irrelevant without blocking it.

- An ability to import and export recommendation lists and then to "pause" or "freeze" your recommendation training.

- An ability to freeze/fork/revert your recommendation profile.

- The ability to have multiple recommendation profiles.

- etc...

Going into a special mode to preemptively avoid a program from acting unpredictably and doing unpredictable things is bad UX, we should just call it bad UX. One of the big reasons that bad UX exists is because companies aren't using recommendation algorithms to benefit the user, and so they don't want users to be in control of them or to be able to easily turn them off or tune them. The recommendation engines are there to push Spotify's interests even when those interests don't align with the user. Bad UX and bad recommendation controls are in some ways a feature for the company, not a bug.

If the recommendation engine was presented in a way that consumers could easily control and if the majority of even casual users felt confident interacting with it and regularly turned it off, then that would be treated as a software defect to be fixed. Modern recommendation UX has more in common with advertisements or the popups websites put in front of content to force you to make an account, in the sense that you're not really supposed to take advantage of any opt-outs that the companies begrudgingly supply.
Hire a rightwing troll. They need the jobs.