skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They're pretty good with their previous model. You can upgrade/improve nearly everything from an original 911 which is incredible... or rebuild it from the ground up.
Now that's why a car from 1980 cost is not far from a new one. And that they're investment.
Why wouldn’t cost be the sole or most important reason for cutting a non-safety, non-regulated feature?

700k in advertising would make a much bigger impact on revenue than 700k on door handles; unless people are that passionate about door handles that they go somewhere else.

Even if your current advertising budget is orders of magnitude larger, the force multiplier on investing in advertising is bigger than the door handle multiplier. So you’re just burning money.

Of course that’s all very cynical. Make the effort to reward companies that build the best product they can.
I'd prefer to phrase it as "constructing a personality by sampling from a wide variety of things so you can see what you enjoy and be less ignorant" but if you need to take jabs at a caricature of a lib to feel good about preferring small towns, go for it I guess.
(1) What are the best more creative/less lobotomized versions of Llama 2?
(2) What's the best way to get one of those running in a similarly easy way?
Why not just ban all social media apps and pretty much anything that isn't strictly required to do their work.

What kind of nonsense is this?
Yeah, I remember a lot of apis that were something like `resource/instance.json` or `resource/instance.xml` and they'd give you `instance` in whatever the requested format was
It's insane to me that the Democrats got this bill passed, along with the infrastructure law, CHIPS and others. Were any significant laws passed during the previous presidential administration besides Tax Cut and Jobs Act? I feel like nothing happened in those years.
Unreal Engine actually applied the idea to implement distributed objects transparently. It is decent enough to power most real time multi-player gaming scenarios.
Not a valid excuse, dude. You have every right to be skeptical or to avoid "bleeding edge" but to assume the whole thing is just a front to raise someone's speaking/blogging/social media profile, to buzz in from nowhere and start off by declaring that it's going to "die" is not the way to act if you "genuinely want to know."

Recursivedoubts has legitimately demonstrated he's not a one-trick pony (previously built intercooler, concurrently building hyperscript) and he deals with skeptics like yourself dozens of times every time an HTMX article gets posted on this site (which all seem to go to #1, if that serves as an indicator of the library's popularity). He handles himself with grace and patience and humor, far better than most of us would do.

You don't even state what your "current approach" happens to be in order for him, or anyone else, to provide you with a satisfactory answer.
I wonder if you could use this 'feature' to exploit a system?

Set up a bunch of servers all over the internet with innocuous web pages. Get all of them to include in their SSL headers the exact identical timestamp of July 5th 1998.

Then get the user to connect to all those domains (eg. with a page with a bunch of iframes).

The Secure Time service will see that lots of remote servers all agree with high confidence that the date is July 5th 1998. So the system clock gets set to then.

Then you use a leaked yet expired cert (or maybe one signed with a broken algorithm) to impersonate an update server or steal valuable cookies/tokens.

Expired certs typically fall out the back of revocation systems too - so it really is just the expiry date/time that protects against their use.
> I can't imagine the sequence of horrible decisions that led to doing this.

My guess is that it was created because of Windows Phone 10. But it's not a feature I'd like even on my phone.
Well, I think my tastes are better than everyone’s. That’s why they’re my tastes.

But I actually have no idea what you’re saying. Have you heard the phrase “the customer is always right?” Im saying that attitude is more strongly held in the US.
> That one's even weirder to me

This one actually seems more straightforward to me? It's hard to design chips so it's easier to use a common wafer and then cut features to tier the product.
Is this the origin of "semi-magnetic-man"?
I'd heard similar stories of customers buying goods they knew they only needed temporally that they simply returned afterwards and obtained a full refund for. It does surprise me a little that stores don't have mechanisms in place to prevent this being abused, it's hard to see how it couldn't be a significant financial drain for them.
FWIW "no questions asked returns" aren't really a thing in Australia from what I've observed. But not having a receipt isn't usually an issue if they can find the payment on their system and it matches your CC# either.
I think this is the answer- why move bodies at all? We've been told for decades now that Silicon Valley is just filled to the brim with innovators but I'm supposed to believe that they cannot figure out remote work?
There is nothing about that I would be comfortable with, and I simply wouldn't do it.

For one thing, a legitimate interview has to be a two-way street. I'm interviewing them just as much as they're interviewing me. If I can't get what I need from the "interview", I'm out.

For another, if they really are analyzing my image to try to read my mind, then I don't trust that company's judgement. I'm out.

And also, if a company is dehumanizing me right up front like that, can you imagine the nightmare that must be waiting if I were to actually work there? I can. I'm out.
No. Compression == information, not intelligence. This is a common mistake that people make, and is a popular expression making the rounds right now, but it is incorrect.

Intelligence _may arise_ from information. Information _necessarily arises_ from compression.

It is very similar, to me, to the concept of humors (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humorism). Empirically, it was observed that these things had some correlation, and they occurred together, but they are not directly causative. Similarly with the theory of spontaneous generation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation), which was another theory spawned (heh, as it were), from casual causal correlation (again, as it were).

This can be shown rather easily when you show that the time-dynamics of an exemplar system with high information diverge from the time dynamics of a system with high intelligence, i.e. there is a structural component to the information embedded in the system such that the temporal aspects of applied information are somehow necessary for intelligence.

I hope to release some work at least tangentially related to this within the next few years (though of course it is a bit more high-flying and depends on some other in-flight work). If we are to attempt to move towards AGI, I really think we need to stick with the mathematical basics. Neural networks, although they've been made out to be really complicated, are actually quite simple in terms of the concepts powering them, I believe. That's something I'm currently working on putting together and trying to distill to its essence. That will also be at least 1-2 years out, and likely before any temporally-related work, all going well. In my experience, this all is just a personal belief from a great deal of time and thought with the minutia of neural networks. That said, I could perhaps be biased with some notion of simplicity, since I've worked with them long enough for some concepts to feel comfortably second-nature.
I assume you are interested in the Letsencrypt part. Basically, I'm running an Ansible script on my computer, which creates an account key, the server key and requests a certificate. The server key and the certificate are then distributed to the servers that need them, leaving the original account key only on my machine. The Letsencrypt verification happens via my DNS provider, which happens to have an Ansible module.

Here's the source code: [link redacted]
I don't think Albini would agree with the summation here, that his public articulation of edgelord opinions was all for the good. There's a temptation here to view this through the lens of the current culture war, but Albini said a lot of stuff --- ironically, to be sure (see: Rule of Goats) --- that neither side of the culture war has ever countenanced.

I think he views those mistakes as mistakes, not as valuable lessons; one of the things that makes his mea culpa authentic is that he doesn't valorize them at all; in fact, he openly mocks the idea that those mistakes could be valorized.
> This is price discrimination

So, the discount is conditional?

How does Amazon know if the user is eligible?

I read the article twice, and nowhere does it say these "coupons" and "pledges" are for some subset of customers.
If I had to guess, they probably don't fully top up.
CORBA is a specification to make objects interact across processes and computers. Its main drawback is the complexity, as it has to adjust to the several use cases (local and remote processes/computers) and provide interfaces to all different languages that might want to use objects, all this in a transparent way. Having CORBA specifications working reliably was a big problem to solve, and it was never 100% done, as new problems and specifications would pop up as needed. Finally, web technology solved most (but not all) of these problems by skipping programming language level objects and moving to higher level interaction through HTML/XML interfaces.
If you can predict text very well, it can still be a good lossless compressor - you just have to encode the errors you make. Fewer errors, less data to store
I think this is a good and important point. I was a DE for a bit and grew tired of it for this reason; thankful to have escaped into MLE, though it was more luck/opportunity than an explicit goal.
And happy 30th birthday to debian! Really appreciate all the work and effort that has gone into it.
> Essentially all of the research, clinical and computer science, that we would be able to take advantage of is based off of digital ECG recordings and numerical data not digitized ECG images.

This project isn't using any of that. It's what one would call a 'novel' approach. It may upset you that they are not building on the existing body of medical knowledge that you might consider important. They are instead building on the body of knowledge that exists in a different space.

> This is the first publication to my knowledge using an image based approach and their innovation is partially validating a deep learning model that is as accurate as explainable models and algorithms described as early as the mid 2000s and can already be clinically implemented.

Then it's notable they achieved this result given they did not inherit any of the previous research.

> I would love to hear a reason for why it may be a better approach to analyze a noisier and less rich digitized image space representation an ECG rather than the raw digital signals.

Once again, transforming data into an "image" representation does not automatically imply a lossy process or a process that introduces noise. There are ML models which operate on the raw bitstream from a CCD camera just as well as ML models which operate on "frames" of image data. Both approaches are valid ways to "see the world."
I consider managing a CA at home to be a _much_ bigger security risk than having HTTP traffic on my home LAN.
Going against the grain here - you will have a much better time finding actual research job if that is your goal with a research degree. A Thesis based masters or PhD shows you can organize and present even incremental work in a useful way, moving the "state of the art" slightly vs. engineering around existing tools. It's 100% a subtle sliding scale - some engineering becomes research and much of research is engineering.

ML Infra is just Infra, with a different set of needs and issues than say, Spring Boot infrastructure or something. Self taught here is fine, and honestly I'd trust a software engineer with basically no experience to handle ML infra better than an ML researcher.
I knew everything was going downhill when I saw the windows 8 back button. It looked like it’d been hastily drawn by me in MSPaint for a school assignment. Nothing was aligned, and the arrow was actually pixelated on my 720p laptop screen
Some people have significantly more need for generating vacuous, meaningless textual content from very little initial seed content.
'Roguelike' has lost all meaning. Rogue never had any "deck building". Roguelike is not meant to mean any game that uses RNG.
€777,600/year seems negligible for the industry.
Right now they're using QR code menus to push ads and collect/sell your personal data, but the ultimate goal with QR code menus is being able to gather data from your phone (like a device ID), use that to get information about you (like your income level or past purchase history), use that data to algorithmically determine how much money they can extract from you, and then finally push to your screen a menu where the prices are all individualized for you. That way they can charge you more for the same menu item than they changed the person sitting next to you, and you'll never even be aware of it.

Right now the main thing holding them back from doing that is that consumers tend to think this kind of discriminatory pricing is unfair (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41272-019-00224-3). There's a lot of work going into trying to get people to accept the idea that some people can (or should) get different prices than others for the same goods/services. Prices should be fully transparent and the same for everyone no matter who they are.

Be very careful when using QR codes for anything that results in a displayed price. Maybe compare the prices on your device with what's shown on the devices of the other people you are with, or better yet just insist on paper menus and walk away if they can't accommodate you.
This article doesn't clarify why the authors are so surprised about calcium catalyzing this reaction. The Frank-Caro process is based on calcium carbide and is over a hundred years old. Anyone have any insights here?
isn't the word "skeptical"?
In my opinion, a better submission title would be: Open Source distributions for macOS 13.5 have been released.

The current title is a bit misleading, because several parts of macOS, including those covered partially by the OSS releases, are proprietary.
The glass roof does add a bit of weight at the top of the car, so it may make the car a bit less stable, so maybe that would be an argument for bigger wheels?
"There is no excuse for any public facing website with a fully-qualified domain name to not have encryption anymore."

This is a display of arrogance and lack of empathy matching the Chrome team's article.

There is a sizable "old web". Built by amateurs. Think people writing web pages in Microsoft Word and FTP-ing it. They're not web developers or sysadmins and have absolutely no idea what we're talking about when we insist they should just install certbot.

Many of the owners may not be reachable anymore or in the worst case, dead.

I object to breaking the old web. I object to the assumption that behind every website there is a competent tech team, perpetually upgrading whatever others decide to break from some ivory tower. And whilst I don't need convincing of the security benefits of HTTPs, I worry about the centralizing force that it is.

Take out Letsencrypt and Cloudflare and you destroy the internet. We're practically begging for it.
> It's worth a reminder that batteries are heavy. They're the heaviest collective part of an electric car, and reducing the usable energy density of a pack by 27% and not the vehicle's weight would be a questionable move—if the end goal was overall efficiency instead of profit. Because there are reportedly no changes to the physical hardware, this means the car is essentially lugging around the same 1,200-pound, 100-kilowatt-hour battery despite only having access to about 73% of its capability.

This seems like something we should have regulations to protect against. Bad for the environment and bad for the consumer.
I think you misinterpreted the nature of my comment and my actual point of view. My fault for forgetting Hacker News is where any attempt at nuance in language goes to die.
https://www.npr.org/2023/08/14/1193676139/newspaper-marion-c...

https://www.npr.org/2023/08/16/1194115195/kansas-newspaper-p...

https://www.kansas.com/news/politics-government/article27823...
Yep, combination of Steve and Roland totally defined what the "heavy" sound is for me, and mostly nothing since Big Black has come close.

One of my favourite bands (The Crooked Fiddle Band - check them out) have a very dense acoustic heavy sound in that they're a traditionally instrumented folk band with other instruments. When I learned Albini was engineering one of their albums (he did two), I couldn't think of a better match.
The site can be served only within your local or private networks and use HTTPS. The certificate is issued using a DNS challenge, for a domain that you own.
Scandium-aluminium alloy was popular for bicycle frames briefly in the 2000s. On-One made a frame wittily called the Scandal from it. I have a Scandal frame, but it's a second generation one where they dropped the scandium but kept the name!
That doesn't really answer the question. I think there must be some important details missing from the article and your explanation, like does Amazon know the customer has a plan, or qualifies for some discount somehow?
Tradeoffs Between On-Premise and On-Cloud Design
Somehow my Casio G-Shock Rangeman cannot do this correctly
Yes, you need a way to distribute the certificate PEM to your servers. The key PEM you have to generate yourself. However, nothing mandates that the server using it needs to have direct internet access, see my explanation here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37153485
If it's truly bad for the consumer, consumers will buy other products (that don't do that) instead.
If you were to fall radially inwards towards a non-rotating black hole, that is not spiraling around it but "straight in", it would be the same as with plain Newton's law[1].

There's a nice graph in the midde of this[2] page that shows the difference between the proper time and the aparent time observed by the outside observer. At r = 2m you can see the aparent time goes to infinity and the quickly back again.

[1]: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/718222/proper-ti...

[2]: https://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-04/6-04.htm
Anyone who says "I spend more time (documenting, entering bugs, reporting progress, etc) than doing work" is missing a key point: those things ARE the work. Writing the code is only a tiny part of being a developer.

Writing a giant blob of undocumented code and jamming it into the tree is bad, m'kay.

Write succinct, well documented features that are unit tested and can be traced back to a test using a bug tracker and merge easily into a code base is what we should all strive for.
And I get where you're coming from but we don't know when something is working until science. See the recent frontpage article on LK-99.

If you got jets and airliners, sure you can look up at the sky and see the thing working. But if you're at the stage where people are jumping off hills with makeshift wings tied to their arms, then you need some other way to know what works, and which way to keep digging. That other way, that is science.
I think they mean the exact same model data (for the GPU). I don't think it requires the exact same model of GPU.
Product owners are not real customers.

Extreme Programming got that part covered much better.
Thanks for the feedback. The post is meant to give a taste of Rama by showing what it can do for building a full application end-to-end. Next week, we'll be releasing a set of guides, tutorials, and documentation which introduces the concepts in a much gentler way. We'll also be releasing a build of Rama that you can download to try Rama out yourself, and an open-source repository of example code from the documentation.
AMD's Inception Fix Causes Up to 54% Performance Drop
LFP batteries age faster when at 100% just like non LFP batteries, but since they degrade slower over time overall, and since you need occasional 100% charges for the battery management system to know what % of charge you are at, it is recommended to charge it to 100% regularly.

if you wanted to protect the life of your LFP battery, don't charge it to 100% every day, just every week or two so the BMS knows what is going on.
That seems far-fetched considering that afaik all cell networks provide time syncing
That's some fun debugging to figure out, heh, a real head scratcher. Nice find!
I'm not a lawyer, and especially not a freedom of speech lawyer, but my understanding is that everyone has an obligation to follow the law whatever it might be (modulo intentional civil disobedience). If the law is unconstitutional then it needs to be challenged in court and struck down that way. AFAICT this law is specific to books in school libraries, which might shelter it from first amendment concerns to some degree.

But again, I'm not a lawyer, and just thought it was cool that the district was like "your law is stupid [implied] and a waste of our time, so we're just gonna throw AI at it so you can't blame us for doing nothing".
N=1 but this is not true for me specifically. I'm a data guy, built my last professional web site in 2015 but build stuff for fun to this day.

I grok flexboxes and responsive design through Tailwind more than I ever did in those years.

I could certainly learn more pure CSS but there's no need at this point. I am happy and productive in my ignorance.
First BMW software-locking the heated seats unless you pay, and now this one...
I only had AI at my bachelor's, but we've learned all of it from YouTube/Coursera anyway, because the learning materials are simply better than the lectures 99% prefessors give.
I had a friend at a German company in the US that said a lot of their operational problems weren’t shared by the headquarters in Germany because in Germany they had more power to tell people “too bad, you’re just going to have to wait.”

Pros and cons I guess, but im not even trying to say one is better than the other. Just that the dynamic is real.
"legal action" does not mean "hoping someone else fixes the problem".

Nor, for that matter, is so-called "eco terrorism."

Why aren't both part of the solution?

> are just two examples

I wrote "until technology solves things for us" to include the wider range of possibilities you mean, rather than two limited examples.
Yeah coworkers were laughing at me for reading the privacy policies. I would put in the orders with their phone/email instead, had a laugh at that.
because every developer has been told to never trust user input, and to sanitize the hell out of it.
The sensible thing would be for it to stop charging at actual 75% and then as the battery degrades unlock the unused range gradually so it appears like there is no degredation for a decade.

and in 5-10 years your range may match your neighbors with the expensive one.
Engineers wouldn't never be willing to do standups or interviews if given a chance.
Sounds like a good reason to just ship the compressed data to the customer and say "decompress it yourself - this bellard guy makes a decompressor!"