skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The other part of that overlap is whether they are using radio signals. I think a lot about the fact that there may very well be other ways of wireless signal transmission that don’t require radio (gravitational waves are one example though I’m not sure if I would expect those to be used for data transmission).

200 years ago no one knew radio communications were possible. We still don’t understand quantum entanglement. Our understanding of physics, while more advanced than the past, is still clearly limited. We may find that there are better ways than radio to transmit data, and this could explain why our radio surveys have so far not detected extraterrestrial data packets (as far as we can tell).
Actually it's not that easy. Paperwork could be in progress for a sale, for example. Or the squatters can produce a fake lease agreement. None of that would appear in any county or city records. The courts, not the police, look at evidence and hear both sides if someone claims to own or rent a property.

Before jumping to conclusions like this try calling your town office or county assessor to find out if that's something they can actually do, accurately and with current information, over the phone, 24/7. I already know the answer. The police do not act as prosecutors, legal researchers, or judges. The law protects squatters, unfortunately I agree. The police are law enforcers, not arbitrators or title insurance researchers.
But none about my favorite animal: homo sapiens
> A South Korean working for an American media organization

This makes sense. Being born in a place irrevocably bestows a person with a nationality that supersedes citizenship, where they were raised and educated, or where they’ve lived nearly all of their lives. In this essay I will explain the good faith purpose of bringing up someone’s birthplace in this context, and I will begin with this thought: If California is west, isn’t Korea even more west? Furthermore I
From what I gather, this is a Rust implementation that runs Llama2. Can it run any other models like the ones I'm having trouble finding info about?
I would've loved to see a comparison against a C920 chip.

Anecdotally I compared simdutf's neon optimized utf8 count on a Arm Cortex-A72 with a hand optimized rvv utf8 count on a C920:

The A72 got ~5 GB/s for anything above 4 KB.

The C920 got 20 GB/s from 4 to 55 KB and then settles at 5.0 GB/s for larger sizes.

There won't be any of there shelves benchmarks using rvv (0.7.1), but if you target the cpu specifically it's quite powerful.
Water prices are subsidized by the california government for agriculture.

Labor prices are not subsidized by china.
The code quality of some of the cloudflare changes is questionable. Optimizations aren't cleanly separated by commits, some of the licensing is dicey, etc.

zlib-ng tried to merge as much as they could from the cloudflare fork without getting into licensing issues.
It is an Apple movie coming out shortly with Leonardo DiCaprio, or am I mistaken?
Ooooh it’s one of my favorite movies I’m surprised I never realized there is a book! Actually I probably knew at some point that there was a book but it didn’t occur to me it would be better than the movie!
A better presentation:

[Are Running Blades Cheating? The Biomechanics of Running Prosthetics]
https://youtu.be/CNhn711-rLM

Talking about unfair advantages of technology use in competitions
look it's really simple: if this is too difficult for you to understand, no one is actually forcing you to learn any of it. on the contrary, if you're motivated enough, you'll figure out the answers to these and other trivial questions before starting the tutorial.
I’m working on a personal monitor mixer - a device musicians use the tailor their own mixes whilst recording, reducing cognitive load on the recording engineer - that integrates natively into modern AoIP deployments. I don’t know much about electronics beyond Ohm’s Law so it’s a massive learning curve. But it’s the most fun I’ve had in a long time.
How to determine whether it's necessary to develop a new feature
How come AGPL doesn't run afoul of #10 of the OSD definition, which is:

> 10. License Must Be Technology-Neutral

> No provision of the license may be predicated on any individual technology or style of interface.

Under AGPLv3 if I have AGPLv3 code on a computer and users can interact with it the requirements depend on the technology used by the users to interact with the program.

It had a provision that only applies to users who are "interacting with the remotely through a computer network".

So...if my users are at the same location as the server and interacting through a command line interface on serial terminals those provisions do not apply.

I want to add a few more terminals in a nearby room but don't want to actually run serial lines from all of them to the server. Instead I run ethernet to the room the new terminals will be in, and at each terminal place an RPi with the terminal connected to the RPi and the RPi connected to ethernet. The RPi runs software that connects to the server via ssh and then exposes that ssh session on the terminal so they can use the command line interface to that AGPL program.

Now the users are interacting with the server via a computer network and so those provisions of AGPL might now apply, depending on whether or not this counts as interacting "remotely".

Same thing but now I provide an app that users can run on their phones that that makes a hard coded connection to my server and runs a terminal emulator over that to a terminal session on the server, where the users can use the AGPL program. There doesn't seem any question that this is now definitely remote, and it is over a computer network, so those AGPL provisions now definitely apply.

And so we have essentially one thing, users using a terminal interface to interact with an AGPL command line program on my server, where what license provisions apply between me and any given user depends on just what technology is used to carry their typed text between their keyboard and my server, and to carry the program output text between my server and their display.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM-3A
This sounds like it would be great for filesystem compression (e.g. ZFS).
The paper with the falsified data is from an american team and has absolutely nothing to do with LK-99.
Invisible China by Scott Rozelle. The book focuses on rural China and it's challenges. The gist of the book is that countries generally move from low to middle income by doing cheap labor. The move from middle to high income requires a educated workforce. If you don't have enough educated workers across the board you fall into the middle income trap where you have large structural unemployment and get high crime. This happened to Mexico and Brazil for example. China's rural population struggles with a low education level. The author investigated why. The answers come down to a mix of health issues, lack of education on how to raise babies, dysfunction in the education system and the houku system.

Short interesting read for anyone interested in China or development economics. The book does a great job composting to other countries and showing that way how development works and doesn't.
Hopefully they don’t need to deal with “big data”
One metric for impact is how much damage it causes to established players.

In the loop of voice -> agent -> voice, the cartel left only one edge out.

Voice to text/latent? Whisper is good.

LLMs? They’re everywhere. LLaMA 2 is practically state of the art and it’s licensed for commercial use.

Latent/Text -> voice? Best you can get open is T5, which is ok, but it’s no Voicebox or whatever. They launch new SOTA’s every month or two, but no weights, no code.

Stay dangerous. You want to work on that? I’ll do it with you.

On books, to get up and rolling I’d recommend Raschka, Liu, and Mirjalili.

The one even the PhDs should re-read is MacKay.
If you're dealing with usecases that need to be cooled anyway, you may well be better off with the tradeoff of needing liquid nitrogen cooling and better insulation in exchange for entirely eliminating resistive heat.
Agree except on the peer review part.
Peer review is a farce perpetrated by the journal industry, both of which are an unnecessary burden and tax on science.
What “peer review” pretends to accomplish should happen after publication (comments or the sort).
For cryptography, every instance is (conjectured to be) complex, not just laborious.

For worst-case NP-hardness, the complex instances are also laborious, while the simple instances are not laborious.
Timeline and frame based editing is the end result but this more about the elemental creation and from there, editing it into time based scene.
Ive spent the last few years in the cinematography department, and most directors and director of photographers will write the scenes on flash cards and move them around and rearrange them because not every story is linear, even though we have to find a way to present every story in a linear form. And from there each scenes requires multiple angles, shots, motivations and things change so much on the fly, that a screenplay becomes a document that becomes quite dense with non-presented information.

So, I suppose the next step to this would be to parse a bunch of screenplays from different formats, into a single readable format and then train an image model on the frames of those movies we also trained the text model with screenplays on to get a cross reference of what is written down vs what is displayed visually. And we can break down the visual shots with camera movements, steadicam, dolly move etc as well as identify key props in the image model (maybe. Sounds expensive) and compare them to key props in the script. I don’t know, I’m spitballing now but a multi-modal Hollywood film producer would be kind of fun but this totally is just starting as a way to standardize the script in a granular form and to code since I’m not out on set.
That sounds like a great idea. It might help reduce the Dunning-Krueger effect which says that people who don't know what they don't know are overly confident about the knowledge they (think they) possess.

Teaching the history of math would tell the students what they don't know and would no doubt motivate many to learn more.

I had a short course on History of Philosophy in high-school which I liked but which was kind of fuzzy because that's the way philosophy is. It was hard to discern any progress or direction in the study of philosophy over the centuries.

Whereas with math, there is no fuzziness about it, except in Fuzzy Logic of course.
Very bum deal.

I've always been fascinated with India and Indians, and I consider them my favorite exotic land (and I'm sure the British did too...) but my actions tend to enrich the locals (purchasing dinner like tonight: Panjabi yums!)

I became an Indophile in earnest about 20 years ago, when I came across a title in the library, "Teach Yourself Sanskrit" and I was sort of blown away. This was a thicker volume than the other "Teach Yourself"s and I dug into it. I learned how to read and write Devanagari, and I learned some vocabulary, though I never got much further than all that. I have about the same surface-level knowledge of Hinduism, which of course is broad and deep, very sectarian and diverse, and very personal to native-born Indians. Though, I did hang out with a few Hare Krishnas.

I feel a kinship to Indians, as we were similarly colonized and exploited, though our Independence put the kibosh on that more quickly than India could throw off the Empire. (Then we Americans set off on our own brand of exploitation!)

I love studying Indian Catholicism, which is also diverse and rich in tradition. Roman Catholics derive tradition from St. Thomas the Apostle himself, and more recently, the Goan Portuguese conquests, whereas there are indigeneous strains of Indian Christianity more akin to the Oriental Orthodox and the Church of the East. There is an endogamous community of Knanaya, nearly a religion unto themselves. I find it cool.

For all its rich culture and attractiveness to me, I would never travel to India. Due to its impoverishment, it's a stinky unpleasant place, from what I've heard. The Ganges is clogged with rotting human remains and refuse. The cities are rife with crime and slums. I don't know, prove me wrong? I just can think of many more pleasant and bearable places to visit that I would enjoy.

Also interesting to watch is the arch-conservative Hindutva movements clashing with Islam and Christianity and other sorts of minorities. India is definitely on a path of self-determination at this point, at the expense of its famous diversity, perhaps.
I had a professor who would jokingly say "It's lonely in 128 dimensions"
I created an intranet portal for the house with a kind of prepper Internet. Plenty of things to do but no connection required, which is nice. It contains wikipedia, and other good kiwix packages like project Gutenberg. Our media and stuff.

Raising a young child, my partner and I try to model minimal phone usage and low Internet usage. But when you gotta use the Internet, it's fun to open up the intranet and let the answers flow from there.
what you're telling me Mr. Musk won't double my money
A cheatsheet on effective execution and proj mgmt, sourced from my network
1. Agreed, I'll likely hide them by default. The results from Gayot/Eater are incredibly noisy, and I doubt most people are interested in seeing restaurants from Gayot's "Top 10 dog-friendly date brunch spots this holiday."

2/3. I was experimenting with numeric pins but have now switched back to pins which vary by size depending on the restaurant awards. I also increased the pin count to 50 by default. Can you try it again and see if it feels more intuitive?
>> 434 mile range, 4C charging, charge 0 to 80% in 30 mins, even in tempratures as low as -10℃ (14℉). ... It’s a big deal<<

This is nothing burger.
Since when is 80 kWh = $1? I want such cheap electricity as well.
DeepEval – Unit Testing for LLMs
I really appreciate your reply, and I definitely considered my router being vulnerable/hacked. I flashed/updated the firmware and even swapped it out for a bit with a different router but same issue.

I was using an updated copy of Firefox and Firefox ESR without any extensions.
Somewhat (by a few decades) behind the times here, but I finally found a set of Robert Caro's Years of Lyndon Johnson books at a 2nd-hand shop earlier this year. What a ride. I know it's a famous series, but I'm outside the US and so only recently became aware of its existence, and also therefore went in mostly blind as to the subject (I knew very little of LBJ prior). Am partway through the 2nd book now, with the conclusion of the 1948 Texan Senate Democratic primary, and my mouth just sort of hung open for pages at a time during that.

Caro's a talented writer, but what really shows through is just the sheer years of hard work he clearly put into the books. I don't know how one can focus for so many years on just one writing project.
Oh good -- a lot of comments where HN armchair lawyers and civil rights experts get to argue how the world should work in their opinion versus how the world actually works and debate the imperfections and injustices. Bonus for posting an issue that will give commenters a chance to air their libertarian bona fides.

If we only had all property ownership and rental records "on the blockchain" by now the police could just consult that and know for sure who owned a property or had a legitimate lease. If everyone had to carry and produce identification for the police they could check that against the title or lease agreement... well maybe we need biometrics and so on to protect against fake documents or false names, but I'm sure all of this is solvable with the right technology. Why don't we have an API that can tell the police who owns or rents what properties? What kind of world do we live in where human beings get to mess everything up like this?
--Edit: this was wrong, see reply comment--

NP: you can verify the answer is correct in polynomial time. (and no other clauses)

Anything in P is in NP
I don’t think it breaks down like this. It’s the biking which makes them assholes. And these assholes can actually cause accidents. So it’s not consequence free. What is it about biking which causes this transformation of personality? Is it persecution by cars, or is someone doing a lot of physical exertion just not as nice of a person?
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/jpt-chatgpt-code-i...

I've been working on a chrome extension that let's you run python code in ChatGPT. You can see the output, see plots with matplotlib, upload and download files, use a bunch of packages, all thanks to Pyodide[0]. Basically ChatGPT's own code interpreter but worse (it's also free, you get what you pay for). It was important to me that it works completely locally and does not save any data.

It is one of my first personal projects and seeing the number of users go up makes me happy and want to keep improving it. I had to make my github repo private because I had an issue with a copycat, but I can make it public if people actually care.

[0] https://pyodide.org/en/stable/
a lot of elixir devs dont even believe in liveview so that's a harder sell than a phoenix backend with some more popular framework on the frontend
Ruby ML for Python Coders
You’re the OS!
I saw a tweet once that went something like, "Mankind strayed from god when we invented the IC", and some days I feel that. Economies of scale crush everything, including our nerdy fondness for particularly elegant ISAs.
My dashcam saves every incident I see of a bicyclist running a stop sign, and stopping. I record without fail. The ratio is about 10:1.

And you can’t observe an urban Critical Mass ride and say, with a straight face, that they’re not behaving like a bunch of pricks.
Yes, I agree, and am of the view that the widespread distribution of piped gas (hydrogen, methane, or blends thereof) to homes and small business is going to be phased out for the reasons you describe.

But you can see why some people are trying to make a drop-in, clean-ish (modulo fugitive emissions) replacement for fossil gas.
Love to try but I've been stuck on [worker] Searching for music...
From 1992: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/44289908.pdf
Migrating to a new Google AdSense Account Being Rejected
It's sad to see people accept the credibility of this article simply because it's from Nature. The author himself is a freelance science journalist (with no real expertise in the field), so this article is not worth any more of our attention than many twitter threads.

You can gauge the trustworthiness yourself here: https://x.com/dangaristo?s=21&t=lI9nNO9bkbL1YKFrdIw_Tg
China's major state banks sell dollars for yuan in London, NY hours
p(doom)
It's funny, I agree with both of you. Considering this repo was posted to this site and prompted thousands of people to stumble on it by accident, even a link in the README on the words "MLIR framework" would go a long way. I, as someone who is both super interested in applied FHE and subscribed to this guy's blog, almost skipped this post because I didn't realize it was about FHE, and I am probably in the target audience for it.
Right, nobody's at those other dimensions at the same time as you are.
But this battery takes in around 384kw assuming 100% efficiency.

400km*16kwh/100km/10minutes
The most interesting part is one of the researchers believed it was Nobel's prize worthy, went rogue, and submitted a paper with only 3 authors to claim the credit of this invention. Coincidentally, Nobel's prize only awards at max 3 people.

Soon after the other researchers realized and published a 6-author paper only hours after.

What a drama.
I would note you can externalize your dictionary in a lot of schemes. For tight protocol level encoding in my custom protocols I often build the dictionary as part of compilation and deploy it compiled into both sides. It saves a lot of overhead on small message protocols. In this case the dictionary is probably absurdly large, but I think we are at a point where new compression techniques are going to have weird and unexpected trade offs.
> to create a cool website for them for a few hundred bucks

I think this price range will push away serious businesses. I knew a consulting company that had hard time getting customers when they were charging under $1000 for simple WordPress sites. They had better luck when they raised their prices to $5000. It was 10 years ago for simple WordPress sites.
Pretty terrible look, given you're lying already with this "We don't claim to be "open source" rather we are open and free as in you can see the code and host it yourself if you want. "

From https://ubicloud.com/

At top: "An open source cloud that can run anywhere."

Near bottom: "Open-source or managed for you"

Image at bottom: https://unicorn-cdn.b-cdn.net/0c2bf736-3f08-4b11-a500-57e4e7...

At least Openstack doesn't lie about its complexity.
I'm pretty sure that any electrician or garage door installer could hook this up. Radio Shack probably sold this back in the day. These days if you don't have an IP address, camera, and an app people just throw up their hands and wait for the Tesla X-Door to get released.
I don't use WiFi and Bluetooth frequently. I use mobile data on iOS and wired connection with macOS. Probably I'm too old now and this way of connecting devices is now a niche :)
A terrific teardown of tracking down an unexpected O(n^2): https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2021/02/16/arranging-invis...
Debian's celebratory blog post:

https://bits.debian.org/2023/08/debian-turns-30.html
Peter Singer's books are pretty worldview-changing:

https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/12397.Peter_Singer
The Goal.

It's a book from the 1980's about operational management. In particular, it focuses on physical manufacturing.

It's in the form of a fictitious personal tale. A plant manager struggles to save his plant from closure, and his marriage from falling apart.

The lesson is about lean management.

My main takeaway is the realization that when we try to optimize something, we focus on how to do something more efficiently. What more often is a problem is that people and processes are blocked from doing work. They spend a lot of time waiting and doing nothing. Focusing on reducing waits will produce better results than focusing on doing the work faster. Of course reducing the waits might mean doing some targeted piece of work faster. It could also mean doing better scheduling or focusing on other resource contention.

Recently I used this mindset to optimize a legacy DB struggling under the weight of a hodgepodge of unmaintained code. It worked wonderfully. Instead of fixing the slowest queries, focused on fixing the ones that block the most often. The result was that the DB was able to handle the workload after all.
Is it right or is it wrong?
Capitalism and Desire by Todd Mcgowan

An interesting perspective on the psychic appeal of capitalism + an approachable introduction to lacanian psychoanalysis -- if you're into that sort of stuff.
Usually the movie feels worse if you have read the book already. Imagination is so much better than movie
perfectly refute! I recommend everyone read it. and we can understand the guy who gp cited is not so ... reliable.
You’re assuming scam works. Maybe the cryptoscammer received zero subscription, and is in debt from putting up the signs. Could be an artifact of gullibility of the scammer, not the victim.
We have been working on https://github.com/ramanlabs-in/hachi
for some time. This ia a webapp that lets you seaech your videos and images locally.
We really need feedback about ui/ux, features and usefullness of the webapp.
NP: Checking a solution takes polynomial time.

NP-Hard: "The problem is at least as hard as any problem in NP." Basically, if X is an NP hard problem and you are given an oracle to solve X, you can solve any problem in NP by first transforming it to an instance of X and then solving it.

NP Complete: The problem is NP Hard & in NP.