skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Eh, even then it's not great unless averaged over lots of people.

There are a number of problems here, but the biggest one, is individuals are very commonly not internally consistent on their political views. What is GPTs inconsistency in actions/replies compared to that of varies views on the political spectrum is far more interesting to me.
The biggest problem is you need to match the pack voltage when DC charging.
Are Dell or HP selling ARM servers to the general public, or still only to the cloud providers?
Now I find I want you to write a review blog in the format of Old Man Murray’s crate test, but all you do is rate the depictions of steam equipment.

Probably a short enough list of depictions - does IMDb list them?
Mathematical Magic Mirrorball [video]
most systems for encrypting large amounts of data (e.g. a whole hard drive) don't use the user-derived key directly for encryption; the data is encrypted with a content encryption key (Microsoft) or master key (LUKS), which is then encrypted with the user-derived key and stored in the encryption header. this allows the user passphrase to be changed by reencrypting the CEK/MK rather than the whole drive.
> It would take a decade to a thousand-person team

By the standard conversion rate, I think that means 4 people could knock it out in 6 weeks.
Most people don't have the ability to choose what affects us emotionally. We can learn to build resilience and get less reactive, but we can't just turn off our emotional reactions completely.

If you can do that, it sounds great. For most people, they cannot do this and cannot be taught to.
> If the world switches to a vegan diet, there wouldn't be any manure.

We could, and probably would still have the animals. There are vegan sanctuaries even in this day and age. But even without manure we'd still be ok.

> So overall yields would be around one tenth of the current ones for many important crops.

Yields were 2-3 times smaller before the "green revolution," not 10 times less.

With better methods, processes, and with automation we could further improve yields. This would undoubtedly require more knowledge than the uniform methods we're currently using.

Animal agriculture is so wasteful and inefficient that we could absolutely free 75% of the lands we're currently using for reforesting and rewilding and still have 2x more space than we have now for veggies, fruits, and nuts, while feeding everyone sustainably.

We should even accept those lower yields than we currently have; the priority should be the restoration of soils and biodiversity rather than the maximal exploitation of natural resources. Soil depletion/erosion is a serious problem, and both industrial and animal agriculture are the culprits.
And a lot of "Ask" are simply "Grab"
“What’s He Building?”

— <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04qPdGNA_KM>
I'm from Appalachia and we have the same thing, and yeah at least for us it's like you're agreeing with them that they don't have it.

"Do you not have bananas?" is like "is it true that there are no bananas?". Then if there are bananas, the host can gleefully surprise you with them and feel like they solved a problem for you. This is only if it's said in a constantly upwardly-shifting tone, though.

It can be said another way, same words different tone, which sounds more like "how perplexing, there's no bananas, let me just make sure I didn't miss them because I thought they should be here". The host usually backs their answer up with an explanation of why there are no bananas.

A third form exists where it does sound accusatory. Like "you should have bananas you piece of crap". Usually said in a huffy puffy I-dont-have-time-for-this tone.
This has to be the worst take on IAC organization I have ever seen. I would have never thought someone would try to apply the osi model to infra code management.

How long does it take to deploy a new service with this approach? A week?
Removing or altering location signs[1] in a war zone is common but I wonder if that extends to safety signs [2]. There are many there, as far as I can tell. You probably don't want an army accidentally walking though a place like that and spreading radiation to the locals. Given the poaching and looting concerns, I'd guess the sign coverage is quite dense. Anyone visit before?

[1] https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/44492/ukrainians-are-m...

[2] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=entry+to+chernobyl+exclusion+zone+...
You do realize that both things are possible, right? You can recognize what people say to you isn’t worth reacting to and that you can choose your words to better respect others.
With LLMs, enterprise data is different
When something is known, it becomes easier to be controlled and manipulated. And soon the government, both the elected ones and the incorporated ones, will know everything about everyone.

But sure, AI will empower the average joe.
It is dystopian because the frog (all of us) is being slowly boiled. We've come to a stage where you start to own nothing anymore, only licence or rent it, your access/licence can be revoked for any reason if you breach their EULA (which they can change at any time) and your rights are shrinking.

Locking people out from their games which they've purchased (even from singleplayer!) for what they said on chat is just pathetic and dystopian. I wouldn't put it past them that the next step would be brain sensors to detect "harmful" thoughts and ban you before you say them.
Bingo. I was bullied in school and that's how I mentally dealt with it - why do I care what some knucklehead thinks or says about me? And the fact that he or she is saying mean things to me indicate I specifically should not care about what they say.

Words only have power over you if you let them. Otherwise they are meaningless.
Ha, the version of ZIP that I use was built in 1996, and I was using a version of 'ls' that I wrote for NT 3.1 -- maybe 1993 or so -- until a couple of years ago.

These programs don't use DLLs, and frankly there's little reason they for them to stop working.
It's more funny than that. Everyone wants text documents as well as rich documents as well as applications but no one wants a single file type to do all 3.
Yes, to save power. But there's nothing to photograph out there.
Basically any ad blocker plus the right lists enabled will do this.
>whatever haphazardly written Go code you happened to find

Well, if the Go stdlib is haphazardly written and unidiomatic then I think the burden is on you to demonstrate that idiomatic Go, as per your definition, exists.

>more baseless ad-hominem and ignoring the points

I'll boil it down to one sentence: Go forces programmers to use (T, error) when it is not appropriate, and Go would be better if it did not.
I disagree. It's not easy to choose, but it very much is possible, they can do it, and they get much can be taught to do so.
I worked for a company that was working on foundation models for enterprise data just at the time that the first papers came out on BERT, which I have to admit, I didn't grasp the impact of at the time.

I remember the weird specificity of the solutions we were building, and in the dark times when other employees lost faith I'd tell them that our solution could deliver enough value that we'd likely be bought by one of our customers, which is what happened.
Of course inline assembly is C. Most languages don't let you do inline assembly. That isn't because they don't like it, but because the way those languages get translated to machine code is highly variable. C is the only language where the semantic model is simple enough that you can see how every language construct would translate to assembly language and write your own inline assembly language in between.
The speech police types rarely imagine they can get hit by their own medicine. Or self-reflect about possibility of being hypocritical.
Firetruck had siren, lights on when it hit Cruise car, police say
You might enjoy https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberDeck/
Romania is real surprise #19, steady growth since 2005
What about the belief that you can't selectively invoke it? That if you break that silence then they can compel you to answer everything else from that point on? How's that work?

They might as well abolish this right anyway. As if every device we ever touch won't testify against us in the first place.
Do you have a source for this? Thomas Piketty's Capital in the 21st century goes into wealth inequality in great depth, and would suggest that intra-country wealth inequality is dramatically increasing in the west, but he doesn't have sources on inter-country wealth distributions. I would be interested to know more.
I grew up in the South. Daddy was a Hoosier and spent a lot of years in the army and retired in Georgia. Mom is a German immigrant.

The upper classes of the Deep South, where people are very religious and often call folks "Mr./Mizz. First Name" as a mark of both respect and familiarity at the same time, seem to skew Guess culture. But then the upper classes generally seem to skew Guess culture.

The South is also a place where people are more likely to own guns and join the military. Military culture is mostly Ask culture. They tend to be very direct and some people find this refreshing/no BS and others find it rude, crude and socially unacceptable if you are influenced by that.

Working class stiffs in the South may be more influenced by the very direct Ask culture of the American military.

So it's probably a lot more complex than regional cultures.
Just for the record, Hancock has never promoted aliens. He's dead wrong a great deal, but not that wrong. His crime, though, is to have been annoyingly right too many times, for all the wrong reasons. YDIH is just one such case.

Hancock's great strength is that he actually goes to all the places he writes about, and his wife takes great pictures. I forgive all his maundering in exchange for the pics.
IIRC it's something to do with the account being permanently locked due to too many failed password attempts, so windows basically throws up its hands and lets you log in anyway.

(This is just a vague recollection from last time I installed Windows, might be wrong)
> Funny enough young Americans waste time complaining about rich people instead of just voting, which would solve most of their issues.

This is hopelessly naive. Whoever you vote for, your vote only matters one day a year. The other 364.25 days are for the lobbyists.
That sounds pretty cool actually.
An article about this topic that doesn't address the fact that emissions standards on small cars are prohibitively high, which is why they just make them bigger, is not worth reading.
W. Jason Morgan, Who Developed Theory of Plate Tectonics, Dies at 87
check out your world in data. For better or worse the income equality thing is outweighed by the gains in China and India but most of the world seems to be improving on that front.

There are still countries getting worse though sadly
Nonsensical argument. Equality isn't all or nothing it's better if we have less of it even if we don't have none of it. Furthermore people have obvious interests in decreasing inequality directly effecting them more than inequality between their home nation and another.

Rich people having almost all the money means in practice they have almost all the power and our society consistently acts in a fashion so as to serve the interests in virtually all matters right up until something is so important that it solely makes or breaks elections.

Billionaires don't just hoard all the toys they are outright poison for democracy.

If you aren't a temporarily embarrassed millionaire you are yourself benefiting from inequality and value your own interests over the rest of us.

It's ok if you think greed is good just admit it and don't pretend more ethical people are just jealous.
> ”Community comes together to co-create value for everybody, which in itself is some sort of tangible currency.”

In this case the community is volunteering time/resources to the project. In my experience it takes a lot of management to pull this off, with PR reviews, discussions, design road maps… etc

> ”But a very high number of FOSS libraries/packages DO NOT have a community. How do you believe such projects must be sustained?”

Without a community to volunteer effort, the creators need to donate.

Either they have a commercial product that funds the FOSS project. Or more commonly, a highly paid software engineer gives back to the community as philanthropy
This one. Not the best design, but it works. HN by premii[1] works too.

[1]: https://hn.premii.com/
Long before you made this argument Asimov had already seen the same thing

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’"

Unfortunately when a person buys into an ideology they become blind to its ignorance and end up arguing on discussion forums.
> That's an interesting attempt to deflect from the income disparity between those in executive positions to those that work for them. Even in tech, while the salaries of tech workers is high it's nothing compared to the execs.

That's quite the arbitrary line to draw. Different roles have different labor markets. If you're a software engineer you are probably getting paid 10 times more than an EA.

> It was recently shown that the top 10% wealthiest Americans contribute to 40% of the greenhouse gas emissions in the country.

To be in the top 10% in America in terms of wealth, your net worth needs to be ~$850k.
To be in the top 10% in America in terms of wages, your annual comp needs to be ~$175.

That means probably most senior software engineers are in that bracket - https://www.levels.fyi/
See also: Radiation hormesis which is the hypothesis that low-level radiation is actually good for your body.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis
caches? the more input the fewer cache misses
Minecraft, Terraria, Factorio, Valheim, Raft, etc. The list is long.
Actual title:

Cancer mortality after low dose exposure to ionising radiation in workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS): cohort study

It's 150 characters, so had to be edited down somehow to fit the 80 character limit. This was not a good edit.

I would likely have edited it down to this:

International study: Cancer mortality after low dose work radiation exposure

Beyond what others have said here, I found the current title -- Low dose radiation cancer 2x worse than predicted by LNT model -- extremely confusing because I thought it was talking about low dose radiation cancer treatments being ineffective.
Milwaukee still manufactures NiCAD batteries for their tools that have long since been outclassed.
Why do people take such low pay for making sandwiches? Genuine question, because doesn't that just lower wages for everyone and sorta peg the value of a sandwich maker to being $X/hr?
I’ve not done anything particularly scientific to measure but my observation is if symbols are fairly rare it doesn’t require a huge amount. Herobrine for instance as a string isn’t very common, so it seems to be pretty good at keeping in the semantic region. Steve and Alex are popular Minecraft characters but are not very unique so you see more drift. But the more you mix in specific semantics, like creepers, or other tokens that are pretty specific to the genre, things improve. You see similar behavior with stable diffusion Lora.

I’ve never seen it wander between genres, but it can tell pretty generic stories particularly if you’re pretty generic in your promoting.
I think only for reels which are longer than a certain time length...
Resonates with something I recognized and to some extent fixed in myself. Not only would I hesitate to ask lest I seem unreasonable, I was foolishly assuming that others had done the same before asking me. And I would stupidly get frustrated with them for putting me in a bad situation by merely asking. I assumed they had figured out that I should say yes and they put a lot of pressure on me.

Learning how to make simple requirements and decline request simply was liberating.
This. "Guessers" cannot stand "Askers" who don't know where the line is between a polite tactful request and a imposition. The classic example is someone coming into your town and asking if their family can stay at your house for a week instead of a hotel. Saying no for someone who doesn't want multiple guests to stay that long is a really uncomfortable spot to be in. Most of the time the line is crossed when the requestee has to sacrifice a non small amount of time, money, or comfort for the requestor's benefit.
I think Americans workers are willing to tolerate conditions of exorbitant wealth disparity for at least two reasons.

First, because Americans believe someday that they will be wealthy and they do not want to eliminate their chance to join the club[a]. In my opinion, this is the most satisfying explanation. Workers do not want to remove that ladder to the upper class because in doing so, they place a hard cap on their expected outcomes.

Second, American political culture is derivative of a property-rights focused political philosophy. One of the biggest influences on the Bill of Rights and it's explicit protection of property rights was John Locke's Two Treatises of Government. John Locke argues that a defining purpose of government is in the protection of property (life, liberty and property). Americans therefore, view wealth as at least in some part meritocratic and rich, having earned their extra property, are wary of retracting that property. The importance of protecting what's "theirs" is politically, socially and legally baked-in to society.

If Americans' belief in their own prosperity suffer and/or the relative importance of property diminishes in light of other rights (health care, equality, etc.), I think then we might begin to see changes for high-wealth compensation. But, I would argue as long as each of these remain strong, we aren't likely to see any changes.

a. https://www.magnifymoney.com/news/wealthy-survey/, https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/31/44percent-of-americans-think...
Entropy or it beying a metaproof?
> random subset of ‘memorable word but actually unencrypted password’

This annoys me so much with my bank. Their app lets you enroll your account into Face ID authentication, then still ask one of the recovery questions every time.

The UX is awful. I'm so convinced that complaining anywhere won't actually help so I don't bother.

I'd love to know what the hypothetical attack scenario is that drove that decision, but I suspect there isn't one, and the app saves the username/password in encrypted device storage.
I would argue that it is making wealth inequality a political issue and outrage around it is often a contributing factor for revolution.

It is also worth noting that the results of those revolutions are often worse for both the rich and the poor. There's a long list of countries that have destroyed productive but unequal economies and replace them with those that are worse, and usually unequal but on a different axis.

People like to talk about the French Revolution with Eat the Rich slogans, and forget that it left everyone worse off, led to dictatorship, and eventually everyone coming back around to realizing the old system wasn't so bad.
This is why I ran a virtual machine for windows even when I was running windows. Virtual machines almost always support having a different virtual resolution vs actual.
My dude I literally quoted what you said, at least before you edited your comment to remove it.
Don't forget to run to In N Out after for a double double!
> Well, if the Go stdlib is haphazardly written and unidiomatic

Yeah, the older parts of the standard library are definitely not idiomatic. Lots of functions in the stdlib which return errors don't even return an error type. But, of course they aren't idiomatic. Idiomatacy is emergent. They couldn't possibly have been written idiomatically.

> I'll boil it down to one sentence: Go forces programmers to use (T, error) when it is not appropriate, and Go would be better if it did not.

That may be true, but of no relevance. I can see why I didn't bother reading it. Thanks for clarifying that it would have been a waste of my time.
income is realized capital gains, not unrealized, and "increase in net wealth" doesn't mean anything. see what I did there? used the words for what they mean.
My family endowed a (small) prize in memory of our academic parents. Universities overwhelmingly prefer untied donations, but some significant "God, not on sports, please" incidents have led to suspicion of how they think donors feel about the spending.

(The prize is to the most deserving student irrespective of academic status, across arts/architecture and computer science and from feedback has been a godsend to some cash strapped mature students at times. I'm happy)
The government absolutely dictates what cars can be on the road, and therefore what cars you can close to buy. I would love to drive a tiny little affordable thing, I can't because emissions or some other sorry excuse for protectionism.
A common example of this is the US servicemen that had come back from tours of Iraq or Afghanistan telling stories of how lovely and "welcoming" the locals were.

E.g.: the locals would make a token offer to the soldiers, expecting them to politely refuse.

The Americans would take that offer at face value and accept, to the surprise of the locals.
So what? There is no conspiracy here. There are lots of other sensors not in Ukraine and they didn't report zilch. This entire article is just crazy talk.
Sanitizers are debugging tools; they don't guarantee you'll actually catch issues when you run into them.
Because the statement was made by Transport Minister Pablo Rodriguez, not Canada.

https://ca.movies.yahoo.com/movies/video/nwt-wildfires-feds-...
> > Would a redistribution of that wealth imply better living standards for everyone?

> No.

Why not?

> The fabulously wealthy aren't spending their billions on consumption.

Naturally not, that would be impractical. However, their immense wealth affords them immense power in society and that is of concern.

> You're mistaking wealth and captial for money.

I see this repeated very often by people defending the ultra rich and never understood why they think it was a good reply. Especially in this case, as their point was some people barely scrape by while others have so much money it’s more than they can reasonably spend. Nothing they said indicated they were confused about the difference between money and wealth.
> There's no social dance to it.

There is. What constitutes a leech varies from person to person, from culture to culture. Accepting help could easily lead to resentment, it's entirely possible they were offering help to seem generous while simultaneously expecting to be refused. Offering help at all could be offensive because you're in a position of strength while they're in a position of weakness, it implies they need you, ingratiates them with you, puts them in your debt.

Correctly navigating these waters requires instant judgements based on huge amounts of social information like status, reputation, personality, context, non-verbal cues like tone of voice and body language. It is difficult to do this deliberately because during conversations there is not enough time to deeply analyze anything. It's best left to an uncounscious mind honed sharp by repeated practice.
Quite a few through the centuries, with the moderate to large quakes originated from the Apennine mountains’ Mount Vettore fault about 80KM away from the city.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236950808_Beyond_th...

https://blogs.agu.org/geospace/2019/03/04/seemingly-dormant-...