skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Pretty funny. This is exactly what I have noticed in watching movies the last few years. Same story line, different leading character actors. Predictable endings.

Real life is much more complex and rich in story lines. Lose ends sometimes just fray until they have unraveled the ties that bind us. The good guys don't always win and too many times the definition of "good guy" is dependent on the reader's perspective or life's experiences.

Life may seem that it moves in cycles and that we are trapped along a circular path with a known starting and ending point. In real life it is probably more that we are looking down the long axis of an infinite spring where events do repeat cyclically but each ending is forever disconnected from the starting point by the terminal forward velocity of time so there is no going back, there is only starting over with a new opportunity to learn from mistakes you might not remember making.
The deepest borehole, about the size of a coffee can, is only 12km deep before the tooling started melting - can't drill with a liquid bit...

So 30km down it would be hitting liquid rock and a lot of heat.
To first order, the sustainability problem is the fossil fuel problem. And we're on the way to solving that.
Continuing WebAssembly with Effect Handlers
and one of those applications that isn't available for linux is quicken.

if you're having a problem with an app, switching to an operating system that doesn't support that app at all is certainly one way to solve it.
Karma Catches Up to Global Phishing Service 16Shop
Both of those are prone to be broken by a reasonably good AI, plus verification of either would be too computationally heavy to be cost effective (Also likely involving AI)
I am writing a low-code tool for Google Apps Script and Google Sheets.

Developed in pure JavaScript and can work in both desktop and mobile browsers.

It includes a custom front-end framework that completely eliminates the need for front-end coding.

The tool also includes many features such as a shopping cart, signatures, and fully flexible forms.

Development with this tool does not require a graphical interface, so ChatGPT can handle most of the development.
It is probably best to follow real information then.

Note that while your thirst response may be declining as you age, mine hasn't.

Annicdodes aren't data, mine or yours.

IMHO the 8x8 myth may or may not be optimal guidelines for you as they aren't based on anything but rumors.
It’s a slightly strange article because it assumes that an equivalent of “reading” which it posits is permitted under copyright is somehow free.

It’s not. If you want to consume copyright protected content you need - unless the copyright owner allows you - to make some sort of value exchange. Often the primary application of this is that an author (or creator) licenses their content to a publisher (or distributor) and that publisher pays them a royalty for the use of the content. However, the licence that the author provides will (should) specify what uses are covered by the licence. So if an author grants a licence to a publisher then the licence may allow the publisher to print and sell books - but might exclude the right for the underlying literary work to be adapted as a screenplay. So if someone wants to make a film or TV show of that work they need to revert to the author. The publisher may or may not be cut in on that deal.

This is a primary tenet of copyright: that the copyright owner can control who does what, and only they can grant that permission, and they can sell (or exchange value) for that permission.

It’s a logical leap to say “because the copyright owner has licensed this work to a publisher for people to read it is then ok to use that content to inform composite derivative works using AI”.

To expand on the proposal of the article that a search engine “reading” an article is the same as AI “reading” an article: when a search engine “reads” copyright protected content it is creating a signpost - similar to Dewey Decimal signposting - not (generally, but see google news lawsuits) aggregating the works to create derivative works.

Addressing the google news point there is an argument that a value exchange has taken place - that the publisher is allowing (or excluding) the use based on the utility they get in terms of increased visibility/audience/ad revenue.

If an AI ingests copyright work that is fine so long as the author knowingly permits it and is compensated. However I bet if you said to screenwriters or musicians or journalists “will you licence your work and unique stylistic voice to a company that will create new works that are creatively and stylistically largely indistinguishable from yours” they would say no.

Plagiarism is plagiarism and if a human reads and regurgitates a work protected by copyright the copyright owner may (as has been seen in various song lawsuits - and other creative works related lawsuits) have a case to say their copyright has been abused, and be compensated.
Thanks for the information. It sounds like an interesting program. The FAQ you mention does do a good job of answering these questions. I wish that was more front and center instead of at the very bottom of the footer.

My comment was more about the fact that the "What Is Job Corps" page is very much a marketing page, and I think it leans too heavily in that direction. I bounced off it pretty hard because it's quite busy and clearly trying to sell me something. That's a red flag for me when I'm looking at education programs.

I had to do a triple take to make sure this was actually a federal program and not a scam.
Something I've wondered about is how CAPTCHAs are ADA-compliant. Ironically, this tech may end up helping people who are impaired from doing CAPTCHAs use websites. Just the other day, I watched a friend of mine who has vision health issues do several CAPTCHA rounds to use a state website.

Edit: There's various efforts: https://captcha.com/captcha-accessibility.html
Beautiful viz. Nice work. Will definitely be sending it around.
How does your argument relate to the one of the previous posters? Two rights don't make a wrong, nevermind that some of these sites do actually buy the rights to display the lyrics off of artists songs.
Bail out David Sacks? You mean SVB - the bank that went bust investing in government securities? So, David Sacks should eat that loss simply because the federal reserve won't stop fooling around with interest rates?

How does that even connect with NFTs?
One would presume it's harder than that, given it's the product of a team/company specializing in detecting exactly such a thing, right?
You can try and further an ideological religion all you like, but I am family friends with a job corp director in a deep red state, they get everything they ask for from their state legislature.
Low-quality comment. Hoffman's responsible for opening up the world of coffee brewing to many more people than might have otherwise explored it, along with other content creators in the space who do the same, and his content is enjoyable to many regardless of what randos think.
I used to do this. It takes about 2 hrs for linens and nearly a full day for terrycloth. if you're not in a hurry its fine.
FWIW, here's a fairly deep (and charitable) article on the SLS by Eric Berger -

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/08/the-sls-rocket-is-th...
Because in magical fairytale land this is how things work.

In reality shit typically gets a lot more complicated when you have one party that has just experienced a disaster and may have lost everything, including their loved ones. And another party with lots of money and large numbers of paid individuals enacting a coordinated plan.
=> https://www.facebook.com/groups/virtualbeings
It would probably punch a 15km wide hole in the atmosphere, no? Which would then rapidly collapse from the sides and collide with whatever was ejected... would be fun to watch while parked somewhere safe in orbit.
France and the UK nowadays seem to beat Australia when it comes to dumb actions. Only the Turnbull and Morrison governments had more idiotic ideas.
Yes it’s dead we are going into a recession . People can’t afford food and shelter . Airbnb is a pipedream for most people now vacations are a huge luxury that most can not afford . The covid money from the governments is all gone . There will be a huge crash in real estate as well due to all the BNB speculation and huge rent increase that are unsustainable .
* Reading uninitialized memory

* Violating pointer provenance

* Out-of-bounds pointer accesses (though unlike C, I think, it's legal to make a pointer go out-of-bounds and bring it back in-bounds and use it)

* Use-after-lifetime

* Storing trap representations in variables

* Having two mutable references to the same memory location

* Data races

Not an exhaustive list, and C has most of these (even the last one, although change "two mutable references" to "two restrict pointers"). Of course, C itself doesn't have an exhaustive list (J.2 is not, in fact, an exhaustive list).
Oh, certainly they can. It's just that the whole thing sounds very petty to me. I suspect that I'd hate living in that neighborhood.
>> The ultimate "the code is the documentation" is "the compiler is the language spec".

Rust has a great potential to become a replacement for C and C++, but the lack of a language specification is a shortcoming that needs to be addressed for it to see wider adoption, especially for safety-critical systems.

If the Rust compiler does something surprising, people will ask, "Is this a bug?" and without a spec the answer becomes the language developers or the community asking, "What should the compiler do in this situation?".

It makes sense because the correct behavior (whatever that is) has not been defined, but it has a feeling of "we are making this up as we go along" because there is no formalized answer defined. While this approach is fine for running your website or building a command line tool, it is not acceptable for safety-critical software. If the software breaks and people die, the "we are making this up as we go along" approach is not acceptable because it has too much risk.
There is no undefined behaviour in Safe Rust. You're right about Unsafe Rust of course.
The one hangup with "Listen to people warning you" is that they produce enough false positives as to create a boy who cried wolf effect for some managers.
I don't know of anyone qualified to judge someones "ROI to society." That is a totally fucked up outlook. What next, eugenics?
> The ~$5B figure is in the final para. And that still sounds like it excludes ground systems and Orion development costs. (Plus ~4 more years of ever-growing bloat, obviously.)

There is a much more official and up to date figure:

> We project the cost to fly a single SLS/Orion system through at least Artemis IV to be $4.1 billion per
launch at a cadence of approximately one mission per year.

https://oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-22-003.pdf

From what I understand, that number does include ground systems.

For what it's worth, NASA leadership continues to contest this value, although they refuse to publicly give their own value.

To be fair to you, the $4.1B figure does not include development costs. I don't think there's an agreed upon way to include them, so everyone just mentions them separately. And they are quite... large.
You combine it with wind, batteries, and storage via an e-fuel like hydrogen.

The latter is crucial. The cost of providing "synthetic baseload" in Germany doubles if you don't include it.

See https://model.energy/ for optimization of an energy system using these to provide synthetic baseload, using various tweakable cost assumptions and historical weather data. The cost is not outrageous, likely well below new construction nuclear.

In a place like India, you don't even need wind and hydrogen. PV and batteries will do just fine.
Kernel Security Reporting for Distributions
Which is why these actions are generally limited in both scope and time, but 'limited' and non-existant are two different things.
There are various studies from consultancies such as McKinsey, the IEA or national thinktanks (e.g. Fraunhofer in Germany) that have put out ballpark figures like these. Commonly the total is on the order of 100-300 trillion USD. Current global GDP is 100 trillion.
Does that include their stake in Hulu and others though?
I strongly suspect that cars are the excuse, not the actual problem.
The Craigslist founder cautions that the optimistic spirit of the dot-com era may not extend to the AI revolution, and urges the US to 'move fast' to thwart potential bad actors like China.
Always nice when the startup CEO emails you directly via CRM automation about your unique potential at the company and when you agree to chat he hands you off to the "senior technical recruiter". Always makes me feel extra special :)
> Vertical tabs take a much larger fraction of your screen than horizontal tabs.

Sidebery can be toggled with ctrl-e. I just enable when I need it. I also the horizontal tab bar with custom css, saving the space.
>The only reason I need to clean up my tabs now and then is the RAM usage.

Total Suspender extension is critical if you have lots of tabs open at once.
What part of this is "Personalized"?
We're all struggling to adapt rules meant for humans and books, to robots and limitless search engines.

Humans read one story at a time and imperfectly remember it; robots can read millions and remember them all.

Books contain static prose; online texts can change and adapt and be rewritten.

What is a 'reader'? What is a 'book'? What is 'one copy'? Who owns exactly what?

It'll take some time to settle on something. In the mean time expect lots of these articles arguing around words they don't define exactly, making similes that don't hold much water.
We had a local Amiga user group, and they had many (most? all?) of the Fred Fish disks on floppy disk, a big box of them, and would make you a copy for a small fee.

I remember being so excited to get a CD-ROM drive and the "Frozen Fish" archive CD!
If anyone has one of these it might be smart to set it at a humidity percent where it's not running all the time.
U.S. Air Force C-17 Globemaster III crew rush for quick take-off [video]
> Feels like a win to individual Canadians to me, even if some are upset at their inability to easily and immediately share clickbait and ragebait articles. I think those are the people we're really cheering on.

This is a very naive view of what's going on or the impact.

I don't like reading clickbait or ragebait articles that people share. If connections of mine do that on social media too often I usually mute them.

I also don't "get" my news "from" Facebook. As in, if Facebook were to try and suggest news articles to me I would find that very annoying. I use FB Purity to give myself a very sanitized news feed that is configured to my liking.

And yet this ridiculous bill that literally no one in Canada asked for is impacting me.

How?

Because I follow a local independent news outlet that posts stuff about my area that actually matters to me. These are NOT articles that people share and they are NOT shit that Facebook is shoving my face. I CHOSE to click "Follow" on the FB Page for that news outlet so that I could find out about things like weather alerts, crime in my area and local events.

That page is now gone from Facebook.

What is INSANE to me is that this doesn't even seem like a case of Facebook distributing that news. It was that local news outlet that chose to create a Facebook page and create those links themselves in order to distribute their content on Facebook voluntarily. Yet that still, for some fucked up reason, falls under this insane law that no one asked for.
More likely, early humans simply killed off the large herbivores, and the large predators simply starved.

This happened in Australia. All the local megafauna disappeared rapidly once humans settled in.
Contractors and YOLO code have an interesting relationship. A lot of near-shore contractors are folks who are extremely strong developers... but the main motivation for writing clean code (for non-junior developers) is that you'll need to return to that code in a few weeks months or years - and you've been burned by your own poorly written code in the past. This motivation doesn't really exist for contractors - write once code that does what it says on the tin (no matter how horrific it is internally) will get you your payday.

I've met highly skilled contractors that have produced extremely maintainable code and I've met extremely fast working contractors that have fulfilled the contract and left a pile of spaghetti code in their wake.
We're talking something the size of a cell phone that can be powered for days on a battery. Hide it near the cell tower and leave. It takes specialist equipment to locate it so by the time someone has figured out what has happened and either got that equipment in or just done a manual search it's been hours to several days.

Or for some mayhem just stick a few of them under seats on public busses / trains set to activate at the same time.
This. Even if you could buy the house outright for cash, it still would have made sense to get one of those mortgages, base on that (reasonable even at the time) expectation that risk free rates would swamp that value soon enough, and, no surprise, here we are!

I was pondering that tradeoff myself two years ago, having retired early from crypto. The only issue is, to get the 2.5% you had to show Fannie Mae-acceptable regular income. Which is still possible: the FIRE people have a system for putting your money in a trust that pays it right back to you[1], then waiting two months to establish a history, and then you dissolve the trust once the mortgage is finalized and you've closed and moved in.

I would have done that myself except that it would involve putting a big delay on my search. Early comment about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31000286

[1] https://old.reddit.com/r/fatFIRE/comments/ojs18l/obtaining_a...
The last "You have built a browser" lead to Ladybird and is now sponsored. (I've heard or read its creator say that its web engine was initially meant to display help pages in Serenity, or something like this)
Yes, you need to consider authorization at every layer. You can blanket deny a lot of things in a midlayer, but sooner or later you need to start interpreting business logic to do the rest.
The second link provided here has a little overview of Daphne's thoughts on why things are dragging on:

> The establishment of the central issue tracker is, I reckon, more to
blame for the current disputes. The old model of periodic ballots
provided the community with focus; the issue tracker has the problem
that, since all currently outstanding problems are listed in one
place, any such problem can become a focus of attention at any time,
and then arguments about the details of that problem erupt. John has
observed in #scheme that the more into detail we get, the more we seem
to argue, which seems accurate. It has also, in practice, become a
place where issues related to the Foundations only are discussed, and
work on the Batteries has mostly stalled. Mea culpa!
Developing at the speed of sound: How Sonos amplified their DevEx
As an American, it frequently shocks me as well.
No, some people are not suited for military service.
Not sure I understand what does "free trade" have to do with anything here? I was commenting on:

1. "We should insist that TikTok display the same content it is legally mandated to in China." I and hopefully 99.999% Americans do not want to live in a country that 'legally mandates' what content is available for consumption

2. "Also we should insist that quid-pro-quo policies be implemented - if China wants to ban our tech companies and control anything and everything on their shores, we need to treat them the same way they treat us." Again - WUT?! Not even going to elaborate on this silliness...

3. "China does this shit all the time." Happy to NOT do what China does :)

etc etc...
Do you just keep making up new definitions as you see fit? There is a well defined order of how our 'representational democracy' works, and in every state in the US the state is the ultimate arbiter of authority as defined per their constitutions.
Which might mean very little compared to the other factors.

3 x 10 cents, which could represent a fixed amount of an abundant and easy-to-work-with energy source (therefore cheap) which has 33% efficiency (hence the 3x cost factor), still costs much less than say, 1 x 5 dollars, which might represent the same amount of energy provided by a scarce and/or hard-to-work-with energy source (therefore expensive), even if this energy source is 99.999% efficient (hence the 1x factor).

As an analogy, let's say you live in a community on an isolated island and you need to eat.

You can satisfy your hunger / nutrient / energy requirements with 1 coconut or with 5 apples (which means we're assuming one apple is only 1/5th as nutritious/efficient as one coconut in this example).

Which fruit serving will be cheaper? You can argue "if you eat apples you will need 5x more of them, therefore they will be more expensive!".

But of course, that might not matter one bit.

The problem is that maybe on the island there might only be 10 (reachable) coconuts but there might be 10,000 reachable apples, so the 5 apples would be much, much cheaper than 1 coconut.

Or perhaps there are also 10,000 coconuts but there are no knives on this island so they would be very hard to open and eat. Therefore you wouldn't be able to find coconuts at the market because nobody would want to pick them and sell them, since nobody would want to buy them despite everybody wanting to eat fruit every day.
It's the Revised Revised Revised Revised Revised Revised Revised Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme, or (Revised)^7 Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme, or R7RS.
Large Language Models Meet Copyright Law [video]
I don't think it seems incomplete or ambiguous. To me, it is pretty clear that it is turning the verb form of "done" - that is, not the adjective meaning "finished", but the past tense of the verb "do" as in "fishing is an activity that people have done for a long time" - into an adjective modifying "thing". So a "done thing" is just "a thing that is being done". Using that fishing example again, it shifts from "fishing is a thing that is done by people" to just "fishing is a done thing".

This "adjectivizing" technique is a common way that colloquialisms are created. (Maybe it's a bit weirder in this case because an adjective form of the word already exists, but has a different meaning.)
Place your watch away from phone chargers. I live more than 700 km away and get it reliably every night on a small wrist watch once it put my watch away from the phone charger.
There are many on chain NFTs that are pretty cool.
Yes, you may need various kinds of storage as well, filled by renewables. E-fuels can be used to shift energy across seasons.
Windows could provide an API that has a font cache, which other programs can use to quickly get all fonts if they need to.

Linux for example has fontconfig with a metadata cache "fc-cache" https://man.archlinux.org/man/fc-cache.1.en
> How many 22-year-olds want to go months without drinking?

By the time I was 22, it had been 4 years.

Just sayin'...

But I suspect it's nothing, compared to army life.
A jobs program just for their districts. A key distinction.
You can make a derivative work by using the character of Harry Potter in your own book.

Fan art and fan fiction are derivative without copying sequences of words
> Turmoil is a framework for testing distributed systems [written in Rust]. It provides deterministic execution by running multiple concurrent hosts within a single thread. It introduces "hardship" into the system via changes in the simulated network. The network can be controlled manually or with a seeded rng.
I, in turn, was reminded of the (quite fun, for 1 play-through) 2016 game about mining oil: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turmoil_(2016_video_game)