skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't do a lot of shell scripting type things in Go because it's not a great language for it, but when I do, I take another approach, which is just to panic. Generics offer a nice little

func Must[T any](x T, err error) T {
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
return x
}

which you can wrap around any standard "x, err :=" function to just make it panic, and even prior to generics you could wrap a "PanicOnErr(justReturnsErr())".

In the event that you want to handle errors in some other manner, you trivially can, and you're not limited to just the pipeline design patterns, which are cool in some ways, but limiting when that's all you have. (It can also be tricky to ensure the pipeline is written in a way that doesn't generate a ton of memory traffic with intermediate arrays; I haven't checked to see what the library they show does.) Presumably if I'm writing this in Go I have some other reason for wanting to do that, like having some non-trivial concurrency desire (using concurrency to handle a newline-delimited JSON file was my major use case, doing non-trivial though not terribly extensive work on the JSON).

While this may make some people freak, IMHO the real point of "errors as values" is not to force you to handle the errors in some very particular manner, but to make you think about the errors more deeply than a conventional exceptions-based program typically does. As such, it is perfectly legal and moral to think about your error handling and decide that what you really want is the entire program to terminate on the first error. Obviously this is not the correct solution for my API server blasting out tens of thousands of highly heterogeneous calls per second, but for a shell script it is quite often the correct answer. As something I have thought about and chosen deliberately, it's fine.
Makes me think of this : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrell_rotation

How when going at relativistic speeds, you start to appear to rotate to obervers even if you are going straight - you can even see behind the object!
Who does actually care about this photo ?

Is it some kind of artistic heritage ?

I don't understand why it would be a problem to delete it or who would be harmed by it.
Milk is a perfect breeding ground for all sorts of nasty pathogens - it's a nutrient ffs. Better invest ~160€ [1] into a dedicated fridge than have half the office get the shits because someone forgot to put the milk back into the fridge over night. I've seen that happen, and if it's more serious it may actually lead to an OSHA/food safety inspection and serious fines.

[1] https://www.amazon.de/milchk%C3%BChlschrank/s?k=milchk%C3%BC...