skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I like the Java conventions with all the files belonging to a package in individual nested directories of their own. It makes things systematised and easier to sort in my head when dealing with large projects with thousands of source files.
Not if you're a non-believer.
> Tantalum caps apparently don't suffer from DC bias capacitance decrease

Correct! This, plus their CV product, is one of the reasons they get used.

> So you don't have to use caps rated for like 10x your working voltage to get anywhere near the rated capacitance when decoupling.

You still need to derate them appropriately, to 50-70%. They have a rail voltage and category voltage in addition to their nominal voltage. It can get kind of complex, but at least it's well documented in the manufacturer literature. (These days.)

Ceramic DC bias derating is not related to voltage derating. It's really most correlated with package size. (Which used to track voltage rating pretty well, but doesn't these days.) There are also more and less expensive dielectric formulations, even within X5R or X7R classes, and guess what? The more expensive ones tend to lose less capacitance with increasing voltage. Go figure. Using the manufacturer tools is critical here.

> I have yet to see 100uF MLCC.

They're all over the place. You can even get 330uF 1210s from Murata. And probably bigger from someone else. These guys are popular among certain classes of design (mostly size or height constrained). Not my favorite choices though... because as SimSurfing will show you, they're sure not good for that 330uF: you get about at 240uF at 1.8V or 130uF at 3.3V. Which is still pretty great for 1210! But tantalum (AVX TAJ series, your boring basic tantalums) will give you 150-220uF in nearly the same space (1411/B case) depending on how hard you feel like pushing them. (Ceramics can beat tantalum's CV product for the small cases as there's some fixed overhead to just getting the tantalum pellet hooked up.) But then if you use MLCCs you have to deal with the underdamped PDN you just created somehow. (Which isn't hard, unless you forget about it.)

> Not all designs strictly require them, though. When for example dropping 5V to 3.3V using an LDO, having all components decoupled well enough locally, you might get by without bulk capacitance.

Please don't do this. (Unless you're trying to keep me employed.) Yes, you can engineer the bulk caps out of your design, and that's a viable strategy. But leave the footprints in your first spin so you can make it work, then Muntz them out after you know everything's OK. You will save everyone a lot of grief this way.

> Some boards are large enough for electrolytic caps that can be combined with ceramics to get you close.

This is actually one of the best overall strategies if the form factor allows it. Ceramics in parallel with tantalums or aluminum electrolytics is a fantastic combination and gives you the benefits of everything and drawbacks of... well, the electrolytics are still big.
Not only did he double down, he lied about it.

He said that they already started refunding Billet before GNs video, but GN asked Billet, and it turns out they did ghost them until after GN released the video.
> What if your country is locked in a two party system captured by elite interests with no desire to actually solve the problem?

That's not the world we live in, so your argument for terrorism falls apart. This is not a "both sides" issue. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-is-the-social-cost-o...
A Waitress Became a Startup CTO in Just 9 Years [video]
Building Fantasy Army – Dwarves
But the FCC order itself explicitly says that government imposed fees won't be affected. The quote is in the article.
Sorry, should've included: windows 11/rtx 4090 (drivers are up to date, browsers are up to date)
Manual inspection of todays commits shows that nearly all of them are @chromium.org email addresses, which usually means a google full time engineer. There are some from other companies (microsoft, intel, nvidia). None from random hobbyists that I saw.
There is no reliable way to tell if they are, so developers have to either listen for sudden page height changes (which usually happens when the dev tool is open, however undocking it fixes the problem) or use one of the few dirty hacks with the Javascript objects, but these are getting patched every year.
Industries are also better with regard to conflict of interest in that there is no conflict, they just have interests which are entirely separate from those of the public.

> Even ignoring lobbying, you see regulators reaching out for comments from industry about new rules.

Yet somehow the only times those "comments from industry" are taken into consideration in a meaningful way is when they come from large businesses with deep pockets or astroturf consumer interest groups funded by large businesses with deep pockets. Genuine grassroots consumer interest groups rarely leave a mark.
Remember, 60% of these kind of experiments (sociological) don't replicate. I don't know anything about this one in particular, but the odds are against it.
Even in that scenario it’s normal to run the database as a non-root user. This is important so that if there’s a database escape vulnerability, some sort of RCE, then the attacker doesn’t have full control over the machine and would still need another privilege escalation path to do the most damage.

You could skip this and run the DB as root, but that’s a big security trade off that most users shouldn’t be taking.
That statistic is about possession though, the parent comment is talking about usage. I'm in the one-third of my country that has a credit card, but I use it maybe five times a year, while I use my debit card daily.
A huge number of companies developed custom internal Lotus Notes (IBM Domino) applications. It just wasn't widely publicized.

Notes was great for quick and dirty workflow applications. You could literally build and deploy some simple functionality in minutes. But it also made certain more advanced features effectively impossible to build at all; it just wasn't a general purpose platform. And the fact that source code was locked up inside binary files created huge obstacles to working in larger teams.
It's more about farming subsidies and tax levels. Some governments choose to make food cheap by encouraging overproduction.
Stopping migration/immigration from poorer to richer countries would be an even better solution. Stopping all long haul air travel would even be better. If you are being honest you know this will never be solved because no one believes it.
I guess Mozilla engineers are paid quite a bit less. They hire the people with a conscience, so don't need to pay the 'do evil' salary premium...
They are also extremely odd choices for people that think the possibility people might boycott them for their political tweets is a threat to their freedom of conscience comparable to Soviet Russia...
I didn’t see it in the thread yesterday but NOS suggests a reason for why this happened now:

Musk loudly disagreed with NYT featuring Julius Malema just when the delays were first observed. This would suggest that indeed this is done on purpose to hurt NYT and not some technical mishap.
Ehh, I'm more on Sutton's side so far.

Brook's post goes over the classics (Moore's law is ending, curating a dataset requires human intervention, etc) and posits that making a huge model won't be a competitive strategy for long because it gets to expensive to train and use.

It's a bit early to tell, but so far that hasn't materialized. OpenAI got state-of-the-art results with GPT-4, AFAIK by sticking for very-super-big models together. Open source experiments with LLAMA show you can still get good results with heavy quantization. Distillation hasn't be too explored by mainstream projects, but I bet there's lots of potential there too.

Right now the winning strategy looks to be "go really big, then figure out how to go small".
I suspect it works as regularisation of the network. It usually happens when you train with quantisation instead of post-training quantisation, an I haven't seen that done with LLMs yet.
Thanks for linking that post. I would summarize this tool more as a log viewer and editor, not necessarily a CSV editor. I mean, this: "What if you’re running a script that writes to a CSV file and you want to see it updated?" I have never experienced in my life, and I had my fair share of CSV munging...
Short term that might be the case. However longterm (as long as the economy continues growing) you would still expect nominal earnings and revenue to increase at least at the same pace.

Also it varies a lot by sector, consumer staples for instance have been doing quite well over the last year.

If you have double digits inflation and can’t/don’t want to buy foreign currency the stock market is probably the best place to be. Just look at Turkey:

https://tradingeconomics.com/turkey/stock-market
> Not sure if God sees any of the royalties

God didn't write it - it was written by a committee of 47 scholars overseen by the Archbishop of Canterbury at the behest of King James the first, so the Church of England/UK State should get royalties. Although presumably most of the plot was copied from previous authors.
> a bug related to cookies

You're probably talking about this HN comment [1], but he was typing in the command wrong, and thus not querying it without a User-Agent (important, as Twitter has known different behaviour with different UAs), and once he got it right - same behaviour [2].

Like, sure, it could be a weird technical glitch. But as of yet, nobody could find a counter-example of a web property Musk didn't have an issue with, where this behaviour was exhibited.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37136776

[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37139792
Your last paragraph should be all the reason you should use "plain old CSS".
"The simplest explanation is usually the best one." - William of Occam

(English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher, apologist, and Catholic theologian.)
Big companies don't produce pollution in a vacuum. Almost all of their pollution is a indirect consequence of our own consumption. Buying a ford F-150 and having a oversized server rack full of expensive hardware that generate a lot of pollution to be produces is a sure way not to stop big companies.
Responsible consumption is the first important step to stop big companies from making thing worse.
Yeah same. I'm new to trying to find fonts, but it looks like it's "Forum" font family for the header and "Proza Libre" for the body

https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Forum

https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Proza+Libre
Is it that kind of study where we also realize that thinking about God makes people click more often on ads and be less performant at using microsoft excel?

Which turns out to just be a consequence of "people who are religious are more often old fucks"?
CO2 remains in the atmosphere for hundreds of years, so it is the area under the curve over the last few hundred years that matters.

China's emissions are currently rising, but they are also deploying a ton of solar and nuclear power plants, and electric cars use is rapidly growing (much faster than in the US). Most analysts expect China's emissions to peak in a few years and then decline.
Tangential, thinking aloud:

The "default" (no css) look of HTML pages with black on white Serif text with default paddings / margins / spacing...must also have been picked at the time to make web pages look pretty (in a generic sense) out of the box? Just that we have now evolved in our sense of visual design tastes / whats possible has changed over the decades, maybe.
Maybe it's because you have the dns ip on the allowed ips list, causing the dns queries to go through the tunnel?

tcpdump or a similar tool may be helpful in this case to see where / how traffic is handled.
Sounds pretty "conservative family-oriented religious" to me.
> The second general point to be learned from the bitter lesson is that the actual contents of minds are tremendously, irredeemably complex; we should stop trying to find simple ways to think about the contents of minds, such as simple ways to think about space, objects, multiple agents, or symmetries.

I agree and think “ML explainability” efforts are doomed to fail as ML becomes increasingly more effective. There is no a priori reason that the human brain should be capable of intuitively grokking sufficiently advanced general learners. We can invent them and improve them, but saying that we will be able to understand what the myriad matrix multiplications are “doing” will be like saying we understand the human brain because we can model the physics of its constituent atoms. The emergent complexity is too high for us to make any sense of it.
Apparently, read this somewhere else, the scam is that they will then change their mind and ask you to refund the money (probably suggesting you send it to them to avoid the refund fee). Once you have refunded the money, they then claim the original payment. So they started with $100 and now they have $200.
> It’s companies spending millions of dollars on donations and advertising to force politicians to make laws that benefit them

They aren't forcing. They'd just rather take the money than not. If politicians weren't corrupt, we'd only have the first kind of lobbying, as no one will spend money on something that doesn't work.
Yes if you do look at individual data points you'll find outliers, that's like the whole damn point people are making...

Look at 2022 now, one year ago, on the complete opposite of the spectrum:

https://emergency.copernicus.eu/mapping/sites/default/files/...

What does it mean ? That it's becoming increasingly unstable. Does it fit the """"narrative"""" ? yes

This dude is so obviously just trying to sell his books it's painful, "believe me and you'll be part of the in group of people who _know_ the _truth_". For every single data point he finds that doesn't fit the """"narrative"""" you'll find a hundred that do.
Maybe there is no real need for supporting large CSV files? Typically large amounts of data will be stored in a database (in which case you can query with SQL), or you will be using large-data oriented file formats like parquet.
Excel's CSV support is just good enough for 99% of the real world use cases.
Using Agile for more than software development
For getting designs up and running quickly, it really is great.

Being able to think "Hmmm, I want a rounded button, with a border and a blue background" and just typing class="rounded border border-blue-600 bg-blue-500" and it's done.

With lots of UI being components now, it doesn't really matter that it is verbose - I actually find that helpful. And even if you want to have a class that you use all over the place, just use @apply and create a custom class that you can use anywhere.

One place it can be hard to use, is if you have a specific design system - then yea at that point you either work with Tailwind and modify the config to match, or you just go with standard CSS - but at that point it probably makes sense.
In theory you should be able to just put a pinhole in front of this virtual camera, to create nested virtual cameras.
This makes intuitive sense to me (not that that means anything). Adherents to a traditional God Hypothesis would be predisposed to believe that humans need advice and guidance from a mysterious force beyond themselves and that such forces exist.

A recent related development I find interesting is the rise in apparent AI/LLM Apologetics. Nearly every discussion thread about LLMs I read lately includes numerous posters attributing abilities to these models which are far beyond anything documented or demonstrated.
In a recent thread someone explained Tailwind was best used with component frameworks, and that made it make a lot more sense and I could see the appeal.
Perhaps because there is a random number generator used in the process?
But that is the problem. I rather see progressive improvements each 3/6 months, then a big-bang change each 2 years.
people are enjoying themselves while creating things they like, why the hate?
> There are plenty of other people from different parts of Europe confirm my anecdote of having a cooler summer.

And plenty who say it's warmer than usual, so what now ?

> We should not fall for the fallacy of appealing to authority

The data is out there, you're free to look at it, most countries publish historical weather data from as far as they have been recording it

> when we can easily collect data ourselves and confirm the findings.

Can you ? I personally don't own a continent wide array of weather stations, but if you do please publish your findings
And it only took damn-near a century after the author’s death for it to expire.

Copyright law on both sides of the pond is asinine.

The supporters of copyright fear monger and present a parade of horribles that will flow if excessive copyright isn’t allowed. (Folks will “abuse” the Mickey Mouse character via pornography, etc).

But I think history has, and will continue to, prove out that these are BS and that it’s all just a cash grab.
If cloud compute is an “Xbox vs. PlayStation” or “iPhone vs. Samsung” type of situation, you are obviously not the type of customer that GCP even tries to attract. Cloud is for big computational needs that can't be covered by Linde or DO.
First, it's a horrendous management idea.

Second, it's a problem solved by a spreadsheet, not by a SAAS solution.
Not when using the selfhosted version https://www.netmaker.io/pricing
> advocate at least, absolutist is more of a slur

Those two are enormously different, though. I'd consider myself an advocate, just as anyone who believes in a fair and free democracy should. But I am very far from being an absolutist — and I have a secret suspicion that nobody actually is. Musk certainly isn't.
In this new world we need accept transparency and I'll even say total transparency. Everything going to be transparent and you have to get used to it, you'll have to behave accordingly. It becomes, how should I put it, integrated into your personality, but if you have nothing to hide... you shouldn't be afraid.

- Klasu Schwab in 2016, source: https://youtu.be/IJcey1PPiIM?t=414
What about ancient 'Illusion', old 'Shake' or current 'Nuke' VFX compositing softwares that totally have been supporting node-based (ie DAG-based) comp-workflows since the early 2000s? Guess this is just a very different (much smaller) realm than your usual Photoshop's and so on?
A little marital cronyism! Gotta love it.

To be clear, I’m fully in support of the cause. But this is still cronyism.
The purpose, as I've seen(I've never done true formal agile but I think it influenced some of the people I worked) is that some businesspeople seem to like to see constant visible progress.

4 days is too long for them to wait, they get antsy and think nothing is happening if you can't actually show them something they can understand in a day or two.

I think it actually affects the code, everything has to be taped together tiny bits, because you can never do anything that doesn't show results fast, so you if you need a framework or an architecture or a plugin system, it's really hard.

But agile says that's fine because you're going to be doing first drafts and throwing away code anyway....
That's funny because when renting in Germany your landlord does pass on various fees and taxes like this but they still have to give you an itemized bill spelling out every single fee and tax individually and for shared utilities they have to spell out the before and after readings of the meter so you can double-check with the previous bill.

Likewise on every price increase my German electricity provider gives me a listing of each fee and tax that goes into the price. This is routinely used to point out "hey, we're not being greedy, most of this actually goes to your government so maybe deregulating us would save you money, wink-wink, nudge-nudge". If e.g. Comcast thinks its taxation is particularly punishing and anti-competitive, increasing transparency about this would actually help make their argument for them. That they still prefer to be intransparent and pretend this is unreasonably difficult when they literally have to do all the same accounting internally anyway suggests the intransparency is giving them an advantage.
What I found irritating is the suggestions to vote, form a new party, or change personal habits. It is surprising to hear someone in 2023 suggesting these things as these are all the things which have failed us for 20+ years.

My point was not to advocate terrorism but to highlight the folly of your suggested alternatives.

Your intention may have been purely to argue against terrorism but in the process you made other arguments I felt compelled to critique. I was not arguing in favor of terrorism.
The Economist mentioned Hacker News last week in a story about job postings: https://www.economist.com/business/2023/07/25/next-generatio...
You can be locally right and globally wrong. Just like 10 people surviving cancer doesn't mean cancer is harmless.
Agreed; it only took damn-near a century after the author’s death for the copyrights to (mostly) expire.

Copyright law on both sides of the pond is asinine.

The supporters of copyright fear monger and present a parade of horribles that will flow if excessive copyright isn’t allowed. (Folks will “abuse” the Mickey Mouse character via pornography, etc).

But I think history has, and will continue to, prove out that these are BS and that it’s all just a cash grab.
You'll be positively surprised to read the conclusion of the article then:

"The findings also offer a glimmer of hope that researchers can correct course and use these new insights to design much-improved treatments for schizophrenia. Treatments that can't come soon enough."

Close enough, right?

Journalists know how to write headlines that make people read the article, or at least some people. They are little dramas, and if you start by giving the plot away like that, as if you just simplified a scientific paper a bit, your analytics will tell you to look for a different job soon. It is what it is. So no, it couldn't 'just as easily' be this alternative thing if it wants to get attention.

And I don't think this is always a bad thing. It only gets bad if the headline is overly editorializing, clickbait or just plain false. I don't think it is in this case.
> if you wish to change your design, you'll have to update multiple templates instead of one CSS rule.

this comes up on every tailwind post and it isn't true. tailwind encourages you to not repeat yourself by making reusable components (or fragments etc) instead of reusable classes. that way if I want to see how the button both looks and works I only have one place to look

even if you don't do this, with tailwind you encode your design system (colours, spacing) etc in the config file so even copy pasting everything will get you something consistent

https://tailwindcss.com/docs/utility-first#maintainability-c...
In my understanding it somehow abstracts the process of styling a website or whatever and make it easy for people who for any reason don't want to write CSS.

Although I have the sensation many people find hard to write CSS and even despise it (I've read people here in HN who seem to think we should've kept doing layouts with HTML tables and don't agree layout is the job of CSS!) I definitely agree having dozens of classes in your HTML is messy and weird.
> Fossil fuel companies...

And we know about it. The documents were leaked and uncovered by lawsuits.

> Cigarette companies acted similarly

And again, we know about it.

> Naively believing that collective human incompetence makes effective obfuscation impossible ignores a great many examples of successful collusion

Where? It's not incompetence. Every actor is facing a prisoner's dilemma, and at least one will act rationally and squeal on the rest.
> Folks will “abuse” the Mickey Mouse character via pornography, etc

Clearly these people haven't actually looked at cartoon porn sites.