skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As a side note there is the following study CFS/me which might be of interest

"We aim to find genetic causes of why people become ill with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) with our ground-breaking research. Take part from your home"

https://www.decodeme.org.uk/
I diplomatically decided not to press on, with the embarrassing subject, but clarified all materials were of my own authorship. I assumed most present understood between the lines, what was happening. I had no illusions of any outcome similar to the feelgood movie stories...These are normally politically well connected players :-) As I mentioned in another comment, CTO still with the company.
China thwarts Intel’s $5.4B Israeli chipmaker purchase
This CICS? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CICS

Could you elaborate?
ASP had some strange things where you could write what looked like a client side handler on a button and it would call a function in the server.

Circa 2007 or so it seemed a to be a huge mistake because it didn’t play well with the so-called “model-view-controller” paradigm where, most importantly, the request handler could decide which view to render. (e.g. you fill out a form and if you mad a mistake it redraws the form with an error message, otherwise it might render one of several different forms depending on what you filled out on the first form.)

He thing about HTMX is that it really wants support on the server side. For instance, you might have a <select> that gets drawn as part of an HTML page or that gets updated with new <option>(s) via HTMX when you push a button. Similarly you might have a form that can be rendered as the only form on a page or that can be rendered as a modal dialog that is pulled from the server when you open the modal (as opposed to unhiding it.). Either way the code that draws the HTML fragment (both the template and any database fetching/thinking) has to be runnable in more than one context. (Modal dialogs are so fun to implement with HTMX.)

It’s something you can do in a situational way or that you could have a framework to help with, but it is part of the HTMX puzzle.
Yes as we have seen through the years, pure CSS has resulted only in energy-efficient websites that are highly usable.

Slash

Ess
I always wondered why US companies are almost universally interested only in Remote/US candidates when there are millions of qualified world-wide applicants ready to work remotely on US hours. There exists companies that act employers of record allowing you to hire remote workers all over the world, and other than the internet connection lag, there should be no impact for a remote employee.

There must be some untapped business opportunity / startup potential here, US companies are limiting themselves to a small pool of applicants for no apparent reason. Is it because of the cultural differences they perceive? Are the existing EOR services lacking in some regard?
>...is that actually true?

It is not.
"hiring", checked like 20 companies, and only found one that was actually hiring
This is the exact quote from the article, it clearly states that men received more relative to their size:

> In response to the study, Google gave $9.7 million in additional compensation to 10,677 employees for this year. Men account for about 69 percent of the company’s work force, but they received a higher percentage of the money. The exact number of men who got raises is unclear.
It was approachable Unix.

If you were a kid or wanted to get involved with web development or other stuff you had a supported consumer platform, with consumer software and this hidden mode that gave you access to all of the Unix toolset.
I think it all boils down to having the remote working mode treated as a first-class citizen.
.. if only somebody had gotten a patent for loot boxes.
Totally agree. Sometimes I feel old when having the same opinion.
Why should anyone care about adding third party tech?

This argument boils down to: “But you don’t need Tailwind for that. You can do more work for a (almost certainly) worse result with a designsystem.css!” Sure you can! Why?
Is it a product company?

For now, the list is focused around product-based companies (while having few of the consultancies included, too).
Agree 100%. CSS is so good nowadays. Tailwind is yet another over-engineered hack of a framework foisted upon us. A solution looking for a problem.

You don't need it. Do devs these days even know about Web Components and shadow DOM? You can define per-component styles now with CSS selectors to target any child elements within the component and you can do it in such a way that the styles are contained within the component... And for cases where you want to inherit styles, you can just use the regular light DOM.

All these frameworks are re-inventing the wheel and making it worse.

It's like having a perfectly good car and then attaching a horse at the front to pull it because you don't want to learn how the car works...
Staying native for now. The only thing with AppKit is the rework for iOS with UIKit. Do you think that can be ignored and we just press ahead with Appkit?
Probably get a medical exemption, like many able-bodied people also do. When I looked into swim-tests initially, there were quotes from other collage's physicians who would sign a waiver for anyone without question.

Still technically a "requirement" though.
Much like the internet.
Work in bigger teams with bespoke css. It will happen ... eventually ... without fail.
He should absolutely be in prison for years at least, but how is 1.2 BILLION dollars not excessive fines or cruel and unusual punishment?
Training to failure once a while is fine, but it is simply not possible to train at a high frequency and go to failure regularly. I personally do not prefer to train to failure more than once every two weeks per muscle group.
I advise people that are new to the gym (between 6 months to 2 years of training) to go to failure frequently so that they may accurately gauge what 1 RIR feels like.
Because it’s way, way faster to build with; yields more easily composable, less brittle components; and has a very solid (and rather unopinionated) design system baked in.
> doctors dismiss patients as crazy or "making it up."

I don't think that's true, at least not in my experience anyway. People (myself included) are too quick to conflate "all in your head" with "making it up".

Things "in your head" can and do have real, physical, life-limiting, effects.

If it turns out that ME/CFS doesn't has a physical marker, then what? There may never be a way to verifiably test for it other than symptomatically. It's no less real for the people living with the effects, but there may be no pill to take, or injection to administer.
Means they made the list. Oracle is on it, so decent can't be used in the popular sense here.
But these are self-inflicted wounds. Having standards and validation for CSS is easy. No need for all of this. No need for SASS either. Install Stylelint and there you are.
I’m torn on this article. I understand where the doctor is coming from. However, I also disagree entirely with the “should’ve been super skeuomorphic” conclusion. From my experience, that just does not work. It could’ve been a temporary thing to facilitate the transition at best.

In fact, I do not see a single argument that supports the “bad software” claim. Instead, I see something else: part of the information was not in the files that were digitized, but instead in the doctors head. This information is no longer applicable.

When you decide to go digital, the workflow changes, period. There’s no easy solution, it may take quite some time to let go of the old ways and embrace the new system.
Understanding ‘Why’ (2021)
Because it’s much cleaner, readable code than anything created since.
https://archive.is/RU1jt
> Honestly, software development is not as complex as people like to believe and there aren't as many unknowable elements as people like to think, and in my opinion this line of thinking is just an excuse to not actually think about what needs to be done to complete a task.

Funny, I've been hearing this constantly over the 24 years of my professional experience as a software developer and I've yet to see it proven true.

Unless we're talking about toy examples like Hello World, developing quality software is devilishly complicated and, in my opinion, downplaying this complexity as an "excuse" is in itself an excuse to compromise quality.

EDIT: Fixed a few words my phone auto-"corrected" for me.
I'm surprised they went for the SSPL, though. Its terms are too vague about the distinction between hosting and just using, and also at the time I read this entry in HN about how it might actually be unenforceable anyway:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18301116
17 Oct 1995 - OOPSLA ‘95 Austin, TX, USA

This paper proposes a new MOP for C++, called OpenC++ Version 2. Like previous MOPS, it allows programmers to implement customized language extensions such as persistent or distributed objects, or customized compiler optimizations such as inlining of matrix arithmetic. These can be implemented as libraries ’ and then used repeatedly. Unlike previous MOPS, our proposal incurs zero runtime speed or space overhead compared to ordinary C++.

To make this possible, our MOP works by providing control over the compilation of programs rather than over the runtime environment in which they execute.
A lot of the performance complaints came from software that was built for the 68k and ran under emulation. As software built for PPC came out, that complaint went away.
You might fint twinkle/twirl interesting - it's prime factorization via optoelectronics

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TWIRL
Amazon Pharmacy automates discounts to help insulin patients get pledged prices
You've never had to search through multiple stylesheets and Inspect to figure out inheritance and cascading for a CSS rule that is resisting editing? I recently had to work with another developer's codebase that had four different CSS files influencing the HTML, only to find in a fifth file an !important that was mucking everything up.

If you haven't experienced costly context switching working on FE then consider yourself fortunate.
Now I know this sounds way OT, but...

'Intentionally they create two different for a lack of better'?

P-:
Ah yes, those people.

Ironic how you replied to a comment about a group of people being subhuman with pointing out that the opposing group is in fact the subhuman group. Very mature.
The native API is much more verbose and less composable. It was a real lost opportunity.
Supermassive black holes may solve mystery of our the gravitational-wave hum
Was checking on https://discord.io/ disclosure info.

Potential Sensitive Info - Email Address Section:

1.As far as I know, an email is considered sensitive data, not just 'potentially' sensitive.
2. I didn't even knew that Discord generates its own email addresses for Discord.
https://archive.is/SEyej
I agree with the code generation of libraries in Phoenix being a drawback.

I think it maybe a reaction to there being too much magic in Rails dependencies, but it makes upgrades much harder.
Product Management Thought Leaders to Follow
Got out of beta a couple of months ago.
Despite a CS major, I still get confused about the meaning of |– vs. |=, and about the respective meta-syntactic levels of the variables used. Ironically, one issue for me is the lack of explicit typing in the notation itself.
It's official – Generative AI reached peak hype according to Gartner Hype Cycle
> Either way the code that draws the HTML fragment (both the template and any database fetching/thinking) has to be runnable in more than one context.

I'm sure it's the matter of time for isomorphic HTMX-based frameworks... but they won't degrade gracefully. but then they will, as a new feature. the circle of life!
Wtf does SBC mean? God enough with the acronyms people.
>how the alleged throttling is somehow so much worse than...

One difference is transparency.

In the prior administration NY Post case, twitter leadership responded to the issue, acknowledged that the company made a mistake, and both pledged and acted to refrain from repeating the behavior. In the current case twitter has failed to acknowledge, discuss, or commit to any future actions.

Think about the kind of outages and system failures we see at any large SaaS provider. At scale, mistakes will happen, including bad ones. How the organization responds and what sort of transparency it provides tells us whether we can trust that organization going forward. Was there a post-mortem? Are there next steps?

Denial that the mistake happened and denial that the mistake was a problem is the worst response an organization can have after an incident. The current Twitter administration is thus far taking that path. The prior administration owned its mistake and corrected for it. That is the difference.
Discord.io confirms breach after hacker steals data of 760K users
https://archive.is/U3iHT
You're not addressing the argument whatsoever.

Your quote without context does indeed proclaim "forcible overthrow"... of all existing social conditions.

If you read it with context in mind it becomes clear that the notion or idea of the revolution is multifaceted as the communist manifesto refers to different means as to how the revolution is spreading (france, germany and Switzerland) and said quote is meant to represent the unrelenting resolution to not conceded to the "bourgeoisie" terms of the social condition upon the working class/proletarian, hence forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions that primarily the working class had to suffer through.

Out of all the things you could pick to critic the communist manifesto this has to be the weakest one, you could bring up the flimsy and quite frankly speaking terrible argument for the abolishing of private property.

Or the assumption that capital is only defined by materialistic definitions.

And now you change your point.
Yes all Marxists are Marxists, tankies are not Marxists however, which is what you originally said.
I had a couple of Newtons. And now a ReMarkable tablet. I’ve often thought that if it ran the Newton software it would be perfect(ish).
Wtf does HGX mean? God enough with the acronyms people.

Please take an extra ten seconds to speak in proper human language!

You could save on the worlds carbon footprint by reducing the number of times humans have to search for “what is NVIDIA hgx?” or is it “what is AMD HGX” and then subsequently visiting the websites to see if that’s right or not.
It looks like Angular on crack. I can see how this can quickly turn into unworkable mess.
You really don't have to do that. It is a pseudo-problem. Specificity and flexibility can also be managed easily in CSS only. Without naming everything. Linting can be used to enforce real good practices. Without any overhead costs.
Context: https://github.com/seanbaxter/circle/blob/master/new-circle/...

Note that Circle is not an F/OSS compiler as someone pointed out before. This however doesn't make Circle less relevant, because it is actually a testament to show that C++ could have been much better without the claimed breakage. If Circle does provide a number of desirable features and its compiler can be built by a single person, then why shouldn't the committee do the same?
Gimp is so well established that it has almost fossilized...

Also, "Normal" layered non-destructive operations are a couple of orders of magnitude faster and do not require 8Gb of VRAM per 512x512 patch, or work only with fixed set of buffer sizes, or any of other strange things SD comes with. Like, how a non-destructive controlnet layer would look in Gimp?
True, not every company is hiring actively at the moment.
But having basic info (tech stack, etc.) you're able to take a chance anyways.

BTW Feel free to subscribe to the job alerts. Every email is going beyond that companies list. Sending the next batch tomorrow.
> I do not see a single argument that supports the “bad software” claim.

What is bad in this article is not the software. It is a software.
Also speaking from experience — you have to have a lot of bespoke CSS and virtually no design system / internal consistency to run into that limit (a.k.a the Movember 2013 brand refresh).

And finally, when you did run into the IE selector limit, you could just split the style sheet in two (fairly trivial if you were using Sass), because the selector limit was per stylesheet.
This feels like an extremely dangerous slippery slope.
The more patents on gameplay are granted, the more they'll be applied for by big companies who will eventually end up with big patent portfolios they can use to shut down other games from reusing cool mechanics, whether from big companies or indie studios.

The potential for killing off novelty entirely (or slowing it down to a trickle) in game development is definitely there long term.

This reminds of Cory Doctorow's recent essay on the trend towards owning and extracting rent on things rather than actually producing them[0].

[0] https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/24/rent-to-pwn/
But it's also worth noting that peak hype doesn't mean the potential of these technologies isn't real - as I write in my blog post on the topic https://www.vccafe.com/2023/08/16/now-its-official-gartner-c...
Sidetopic: is there anything similar to GitHub Accelerator but for companies instead of individual developers?
> Magically cheaper ways to clean up pollution, and ways to cause less pollution will be then created

Sure. Also while we're at it, we can tax companies for not using perpetual motion in their industrial processes, and, magically, perpetual motion machines will be invented.
It's a boring and battle proven tool that just works and has no use by date, by the way.
Why haven't we got "story patents" yet?

Next great investment opportunity: Raise money to get the laws changed / bribe some judges into deciding that broad storylines can be patented, then patent "boy meets girl" etc, and start extorting Hollywood for chunks of their revenue stream.

Probably best to sell the idea to those big "IP conglomeration" first; they'd invest early in exchange for a share of the extorted revenue stream later, I'm sure. Fits right into their business model.
> This is a difficult issue, but ultimately I come down on the side that it is better to let ten misinformative tweets go free than it is to have one tweet covered by a note that judges it unfairly.

That seems strictly worse, to me. If you have a good tweet with a bad note, you have 1 piece of good info and 1 piece of bad info. If you have 10 tweets with bad info and no notes, you have 10 pieces of bad info. Community Notes does not seem to be able to address that issue in its current form as it seems to require notes not be very controversial and, as discussed in the article, many things these days are quite controversial. Or, in other terms, if you want to spread misinformation on Twitter and trivially defeat the lame mitigation that is Community Notes, you just need to make it controversial.
I don't think you can know that. For example, I could say culture brings economy and system. If you have a culture of hard work and merit then you will generate a high economy, and whether you have representative or direct democracy you will steer certain ways.

One I think clearer example is a direct democracy can choose to ignore minorities (of any stripe) more, and have more to spend on visible things that help most people, but also allow smaller groups to fall away (or not allow them in at all). I don't know if that's the case for Switzerland, as with wealth comes the ability to mitigate this, but that is the traditional danger with direct democracy.
If it's trained on pictures of children and adult porn, the model can easily combine the two concepts. Even if you remove one of these from the training set, it can be finetuned back in to the model with very little effort.
Most probably the hassle/liability of messing up taxes.

If you are hiring someone abroad the simplest way still is to hire it out as contract work.
What’s the alternative?

According to Cambridge dictionary, Capitalism is,

“an economic and political system in which property, business, and industry are controlled by private owners rather than by the state, with the purpose of making a profit”

So the alternative is state control and history tells us that only works with certain endeavours - e.g. military - and can be catastrophic when applied to things like agriculture (see collectivization).
I’m surprised to see that the OP, as a Django user, does not call out the lack of an out of the box admin tool that’s not there in Phoenix. Django’s admin is amazing and super useful in production. I love phoenix but I miss an admin tool :(
Personally I dont like it. I think this will look as good as "everything in YAML" for CI/CD on an non-trivial codebase.
So glad to read comments like this. I cannot believe my eyes that most devs these days just don't get it and litter their projects with layer upon layer upon layer of unnecessary complexity.

I thought a person had to be rational to become a developer but oh my, how wrong I was.
I've been a HTMX fan "since before was cool"..

Very happy for the recent attention and "success". Also enjoying the shitposting and backlash mostly from the front-end crowd who believe the Web was invented in 2013 and they "made that city". :)

I'm biased since the time Backbone.js came around, I understood part of the pain but was moderately skeptical, fast forward to React with the young energetic bros building dead simple 5 page websites with a Rube Goldberg setup of front-end frameworks, I've cashed out my tech chips and never touched those things.
Optimization at every step.
No it’s a consultancy
I would absolutely very much appreciate it as a developer, because nowadays,the motivational structures put in place rarely do anything for me but this would be a great: problem -> effort -> feedback -> closure -> motivation; loop element
I work every day with web projects, and the notion "Tailwind won" in any capacity sounds like a thunder from a clear sky.

If we see more articles to that effect and this is not an outlier, it means the Tailwind cult is in its "red dwarf" stage, where the community becomes smaller, but denser and more convinced than ever that the entire world is a copy of their small bubble.

That's good, it means in a few years Tailwind will be considered a dead tech. Tech bubbles are so weird. It's like the tulip mania or the NFT craze. It all makes sense when you're in the bubble. While those outside are looking at it, and seeing what is clearly mass psychosis.
Joinup Licensing Assistant – Find and compare software licenses
React is JS in html.

Htmx is JS in string.

Goodluck stringify :))
> Aren’t there stories in the news regularly about ISPs adding additional “fuck you” fees just because they can? So this does not seem to be working. At the end of the day, when I buy a beer I don’t care that €0.20 is going to their administrative overhead and €1.28 to their installations’ maintenance. That is not supposed to be the customer’s problem.

Yes they do sometimes add their own fees like you say. But those are usually clear flat amounts per line per month, so calculation of that is easy enough. It’s still worthwhile for customers to be able to catch accidental or intentional overcharges versus their published fee schedule, since that ability is part of what keeps companies relatively diligent and honest in this area. Widespread mistakes can and do lead to class action lawsuits or easy boilerplate individual arbitrations or government investigations, in the US.

Additionally, some customers qualify for exemptions or reductions for certain governmentally imposed fees. Transparency as to what is being charged is important to make it easy to notice whether this kind of exemption is or isn’t being applied.
Why not use the devtools "to see how the button both looks and works"?