skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you missed my point.

Java AOT does not, and will probably never, offer a comparable experience with Go. Yes, it’s possible. But it’s not easy.
Part of it is that’s it’s just a big area. I live in a Metrowest exurb just a few mile drive from commuter. I’m still a 90-120 minute commute each way depending upon where the 2 stations are to where I’m going which isn’t sustainable anywhere daily IMO. But I’m actually less than 30 minute from my main office though I haven’t been in there in years.
The prisoner’s dilemma of existing residents resisting density thinking it drives up their home price.
Human speech is in the 2-4 tokens per second range, I think that's about where my frustration limit is.
Your 0 link is a computer simulation. It is literally reporting that researchers imagined a world and reported on it. That is an academically worthy thing to do, but not evidence of how reality works.

The second paper is difficult to argue about because I can't read it, but it is difficult to imagine that someone's quality of life could rise but their health worsens. That seems radically unlikely to the point where you need a pretty solid research base before taking the idea seriously. The paper is probably either making a mistake or says something different in the body text to what the title implies because it is likely that income inequality rose and living standards dropped.

It is the living standard that leads to outcomes. The inequality is a red herring. People are so bad at guessing relative income that they can't even detect real inequality. They usually pick up on poverty instead, which is completely different.
I’m very skeptical that you have lived in a US suburb with single family homes. They are almost never walkable, have no services except those you drive to and life involves driving from one parking lot of another. Having lived in several EU cities, ideal density to me appears to be 3 to 7 story buildings arranged into city blocks with 20 to 40 businesses within a 1km walk.
pdf is fine but the epub engine is limited and inferior to what I expected. The pdf reader has a serious issue with zooming. It takes too long to crop a pdf, especially after the update that made things worse (pinch and zoom).
Could perfume be our secret weapon in the war on mosquitoes?
Here's a fun little short story that touches on the idea on not being the top layer of the sim.

https://qntm.org/responsibility
Does anyone with a legal background know if there is a distinction between regular fair use and use of content with a specific clause telling you not to use it? As in, assuming training AI on copyrighted content is fair use, would adding a clause like this change anything? One would hope not as it would represent a pretty big loophole that would render fair use irrelevant.

One thing I've wondered about separately is making people sign an NDA before showing them content.
Yes, freedom of speech is freedom from certain kinds of consequences. What else could it possibly be?

As the old Soviet joke goes: people in the USSR had freedom of speech too, but they could only use it once.
Which books do you read that you're not bothered by the slow page turning, or not quite fitting a4ish size?

Perhaps the epub experience has improved - but I've mostly used it with White Wolf rpg pdfs (granted, they are terrible - almost unreadable even in print) as well as other rpg books - typically large format, two columns - and its awful on the rm2.
My friends did in the 2000s, mostly as impulse buys in the checkout line when mom was paying for groceries. I still get a pack now and then because it’s fun just to see who you get.

I’m sure they’re not as popular as when they came with gum (and less popular as when they came with tobacco).
By waiting forever.

I understand that "forever" is a nebulous term, but it works both ways. We both know that no computer program could actually run forever.
No! Not when adults fight over new boxes arriving at stores and not when a pack of 5 cards goes for $25. It’s an industry that time and again builds up a massive bubble only to see it pop from over supply.
I mean, I’ve also never seen a real unicorn.

The closest we are to real “communism” I would say is in Switzerland,
where people vote together on any issue in a direct democratic way. They seem to reject economical communism, where the means of production are owned together.
Regardless of agreement, shipping and handling are not synonyms.
Then your apartment complex should ban ebikes repairs, not the state.
One reason you don’t want a class for every component is that standard JS minifiers won’t compress method call names, but can compress imported function names. So the cost in the minified bundle between a class component and an equivalent function component is huge, multiplied out by the complexity of the component.

`this.handleClick` vs `c`.

I still use classes for building data structured but don’t think creating classes should be encouraged by a framework.
Ask HN: Tool to Detect Dead Links
Does someone knows a tool which given a page can crawl through all the links and follow links along the way and output all the deadlinks ?
> people sharing knowledge on the internet without expecting anything in return

Imagine: creative person shares their output with friendly-apparently-non-profit website X, then behind the scenes company Y scrapes and uses it, then sells a closed-source product based on it to Big Corps Z1 - Z100.

Y and Z both get rich. The original creator? Gets nothing, and they may not even know what's happened.

Maybe I'm getting too old for this, but "sharing knowledge on the internet" isn't what it used to be. Neither are licence agreements :/
Which ones are you building?
Lawyers aren't paid to predict the future. Lawyers are paid to be persuasive in the present.

Looks like his parents did too good a job there. SBF didn't just persuade those around him that the future was glittering and guaranteed, he persuaded himself.
I named some examples that might fit the bill in another comment: "Makhnovia" (wiped out by the Soviet Union), revolutionary Catalonia (wiped out by the Soviet Union and the Spanish fascists), Shinmin (wiped out by the Soviet Union and Imperial Japan), the Paris Commune (at least partially), Rojava and the Zapatistas (tho they would eschew any Western attempt at labelling them).

Most anarchists however tend to focus on prefiguration: creating environments in which communism can take hold when the superstructure collapses or goes away. This can take the form of mutual aid programs, weapons and first aid trainings, farming/housing cooperatives and so on just to name some of the more overt examples. Arguably the Black Panthers came closer to communism than the Soviet Union.
Its a huge change and increased burden to
ordinary users and "ordering users to use 2FA or else"
is not the tone i'd expect from website that
thrive on voluntary participation, suddenly
dictating that i could only login with specific
setup from specific devices.
Then you won't have to worry about spending the money -- there won't be any extra! :P
OpenTF Foundation
Although I knew about core wars, I never played it. But I must confess I spent a ridiculous amount of time creating super destructive machines with pascal and p-robots :)

https://corewar.co.uk/probots.htm
> nothing is stopping you from making a wrapper component like...

I'd suggest avoiding that, since the inner JX expression will be evaluated even if cond is false. In the best case this just means some unnecessary allocations, but in other cases it can cause unexpected errors (e.g. you check obj != null then try to use it inside the if).
Thanks for posting this here, kind stranger!

Fun fact about the Flutter SDK: it's a wrapper over our native SDKs, which themselves wrap our React Native codebase :-)

Right now we have a shared codebase between web and react-native, and from there are able to provide all our mobile SDKs:

- Native Android SDK (Java wrapper for RN)
- Native iOS SDK (ObjC wrapper for RN)
- React Native SDK (JS component of the RN parts)
- Flutter SDK (Kotlin / Swift wrapper of the Java / ObjC SDKs)

It has been quite fun to work on these!
https://medevel.com/os-broken-link-checkers-to-improve-your-...
This is just theodicy with extra steps!

I'm reminded of the Culture novel Surface Detail, which basically revolves around d the ethics surrounding simulating consciousness. There is a society in the book which runs afterlife simulations, including a pretty horrible hell. Conflict over whether this should be allowed to continue is one of the main drivers of the plot.
>> We would absolutely use GPT if it was legal,

Can't you just use the Azure service now?
This seems like a good idea at first glance as an alternative to VC vs bootstrap dilemma. I particularly like the clause to buy out investors with revenue, most companies we see getting funded IMO are not viable for VC but would be perfectly fine mid sized businesses that just require some investment to get started.
Reform and revolution was an active area of debate between Western European communists. What made Western European communists lean towards revolution were the bans on socialist parties by various countries, and the subsequent repression. This convinced many communists that they would simply never be allowed to get elected and transition out of capitalism.

The second thing that ended reformism amongst Western communists was World War 1, which was used as a cudgel against any kind socialism and allowed the state to essentially use wars as a pretext to destroy communist movements and expel antiwar radicals from popular leftwing parties.

And the rest of people didn't want nothing to do with it. The SPD, when it was an explicitly Marxist and revolutionary part in Germany for example, got up to 35% of the vote.

It's after the expulsion from the SPD and the bans on various communist activities that Western European communists were decided on revolution. It wasn't because they were cartoonish bloodlusting villains.
You cracked the case
People are paid to deliver features and yet the forums are full of why this and that is annoying in React and how version X.Y.Z is replacing it with something else that will be the next annoying this that people in the forums will discuss. I sense lack of alignment between intention and results here.

Knowing how to architect your app remains important, and once you know it, it's trivial. For those who refuse to learn it because they deem it a gargantuan task, frameworks will keep trying to provide a "generic" solution, but a "generic" solution is by necessity overcomplicated, overengineered, and bloated, because it's trying to address EVERYONE's concern and specific needs.

At no point in time will a monolithic "everything solution" be simpler than a specific modular solution to a specific modular problem.

React started with the promise of simplicity, and being a library, not a framework. Somewhere along the line this ideal was lost, this happens often. And it happens often because many small elegant solutions start with the intent of replacing the status quo bloated behemoth framework that everyone hates. What they don't realize is that with lack of understanding of why frameworks end up like this, this is the fate THEY will share one day. Entropy is a b**ch.
Sure, but the perception exists - whether you like it or not.
Pay attention when wandering the Internet, and keep an eye out for interesting threads to pull get exceptionally interested in thread-pulling when people tell you not to pull them. Be prepared to not be squeaky clean, and be alert.
“Shipping and handling” is a ubiquitous term in U.S. online stores and I’d challenge you to find any site that separates them out like Fanatics does.
In the book 48 Laws of Power from Robert Greene, Law 13 addresses this. If you held them by past deeds people will feel that they owe you something and nobody wants to owe anything to anyone. It is better instead to show them what they have to gain from now on.
I'm so behind on this story. I've never paid that much attention to it and there are many details I don't fully understand, but I want to catch up.

Can someone give me a link to a single, concise article that explains this whole thing from the beginning?
A Dutch Psychologist Wants to Vaccinate You Against Fake News
For your div demo, sure, heck even the "todoapp" might work well enough with it.

But please, build something proper with just that and presumably a .innerHTML = ...

Let us know how it goes :)
It's a cat and mouse game, and currently the ball is in LibreScore's court. This message is dated Aug 8.

https://discord.com/channels/774491656643674122/776384156602...

> MuseScore has patched the LibreScore App. The server will be down for the foreseeable future until I find a solution (possibly by the end of August). In the meantime you can download MIDI, MP3, and PDF using the browser extension.
It totally could be solved. Make it a licensed profession. Make it like the legal practice where you have to go to school for 3 years and then pass a test to get your license. Only half joking.
The remarkable2 is a highly opinionated device. Like most strongly opinionated people, if your needs / incentives / perspectives align, you'll get on perfectly.
If not, you'll have a strong repulsion to the device.

They have an intentionally slow development cycle, which stays very true to Remarklable's interpretation on how to use the device.

I find that I align perfectly with the workflow imposed by the device (note-taking, PDF Markup, casual reading, specifically of magazines / PDFs).

I've tried other "kitchen-sink" android eInk devices (full-colour, etc) - and hated them for their confused approach.

However, the biggest reason to avoid remarkable are their anti-customer / flagrant disrespect for customer rights.

The lower-half of my device's screen began to malfunction, and eventually stopped working altogether. The EU has very clear laws on this situation: within the first year of purchase, the device must be replaced.

Remarkable initially refused to replace the device, eventually capitulated but sent a pen instead of the device, and then refused, once again, to replace the device. Bear in mind that I had sent my device to them.

Contact via the European Consumer Centres Network was ignored. I reached out politely to the CEO via email to ask for his attention to the situation. No reply.

Finally, when I initiated legal action against them, they proposed to replace the device with a "refurbished" device, and only when my lawyers insisted did I receive a new replacement device.

The craziest part is that I had purchased 6 devices for our team.
Not sure about now but a few years back the company I worked for was heavily vested in Finagle [1] using Future<T> pools. I'm sure virtual threads would only enhance this framework. Also, Spring and it's reactive webflux would probably benefit as well [2].

[1] https://twitter.github.io/finagle/

[2] https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webflu...
https://archive.ph/UlA7E
> Volume of BH is defined by event horizon.

The event horizon is a three-dimensional null hypersurface, though, encompassing a four-dimensional spacetime "volume". You are probably referring to the two-dimensional apparent horizon, which depends on the spatial slicing.
We had that discussion here in the past, I’ll just repeat my point of view: When someone says “SSR” today, especially with a Javascript context, they are specifically referring to Javascript SPAs (pre-)rendered server-side.

So, considering this, is it still nonsense? (I honestly don’t know.)
Care to elaborate? Jitsi Meet might not be right answer to all use cases, but IMHO (disclaimer, I work on Jitsi at 8x8) it strikes a good balance.

Many think they can go P2P, but browsers implement one bandwidth estimator per PeerConnection, so that begins to hurt quickly in practice.

In addition, sending multiple HD streams to serveal participants it's going to hurt the sender, but an SFU helps with that.

There are many more reasons, this is just scratching the surface.
>but the biggest thing that makes me -- mad are the climate change deniers.

Don't say things like "life is barely enjoyable anymore" if you have any aspirations of changing their minds. (and you should if you care about the environment)

It's primarily an in/outgroup deal and what they perceive as melodrama just makes the divide worse. These people usually hunt/fish/enjoy the outdoors too. You can connect with that.
UniFi Doorbell? It doesn’t require a cloud connection and remains local, can be integrated into HomeAssistant / Scrypted / Homebridge.
I wonder how many people these days know why PowerPoint slides are called slides.
> Are you assuming it's a call to kill them rather than a plea to not waste the protein?

It could possibly be such a plea if the implication is that their death is already imminent. Which means it's still advocating their downfall.

This isn't about cannibalism and your comments here are a waste of everyone's time.
Can you add more detail to the question? A command line tool (which operating system), a web application, a free or paid service that checks one-time or regularly? Links within the website or outside, too?
People have wrong ideas about all sorts of things, that doesn't mean we need to perpetuate them.
The key was there wasn’t any money it; there was value but the ability to even send remote money was so rudimentary that the only people doing the things were amateurs in the true sense of the word - doing it for the love of the thing.
Huh interesting, do you happen to have a link that goes into cycle detection? If it comes with MobX out-of-the-box, I can say that it did not seem to have kicked in for our use cases (but maybe it's an opt-in?)
I think the claim is like this: You have the primordial universe, shortly after the big bang, with fluctuations in density. But the whole density is very high. A fluctuation over a large region could put the region over the threshold to become a black hole, because the density required for that to happen is lower than for a small region.

Mind you, I don't know if this actually works. What was the density of the early universe, compared to the density required to form a black hole? How large were the fluctuations? Is this scenario plausible at all?

I suppose that if you go back close enough to the big bang, then you can get a density high enough. But then, if you go back not much farther, shouldn't the whole universe have formed a black hole? And if it didn't, can we trust the logic that says that the situation should have led to the formation of giant black holes?
His politics are set out in some detail on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell#Politics

He also wrote quite a lot about his political views, which were sharpened after visiting anarchist Catalonia and fighting in the Spanish civil war. See e.g. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwel...

> The Spanish war and other events in 1936-37 turned the scale and thereafter I knew where I stood. Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it.
I was in a similar situation at a startup I worked for, except they are trying to get their software into the control systems in industrial refrigeration facilities. I have brought up repeatedly that their Netflix-style cloud model for control systems had caused multiple incidents and have called for an architecture discussion which other engineers supported but which the management shut down. Soon after they moved to terminate me but they failed to execute on it so I sent them a resignation notice instead and notified the investors and one customer of the issues and let them work out the whole thing.

For all intents and purposes what they tried to do was retaliation, but I think they were legally absolutely in the clear to (try to) terminate my employment. The same seems to be true of the Salesforce guy. The company had the right to fire him, and, outside of any at-employment NDAs he has the right to tell everyone what he saw. That he is suing them makes you wonder if he's doing it for the money rather than the principle.
Android, IOS (with e.g. kmm, or compose multiplatform), browser (with kotlin-js and react, fritz2, kweb, or several other popular frameworks). Soon web assembly. And there are of course lots of jvm based server projects that use some sort of asynchronous framework (Spring web flux, vert.x, netty, etc.) that you can use with co-routines as well.

Basically everything except what you are doing with it. Nothing wrong with that, I've been on such projects too.

Anyway, non blocking IO is pretty common in the jvm world these days. And most of that works great with co-routines. And of course most Kotlin users are still found on Android. Doing modern Android without co-routines is not a thing.
Well, It’s just a legal definition for the organization. Many for-profit Silicon Valley startups don’t make profits either, but employees still get paid and executives cash out hundreds of millions of dollars.
There was another paper out recently that adds to this: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.04430.pdf. Looks like a more flexible approach to document storage, and it outperforms retrieval in context.

They trained up their own LLM, but from the text it seems like it might be possible to use any LLaMA-style LM without retraining. Not sure though, need to give it a proper look.
Oh, multilevel undo was something that was not hard to fathom and that I yearned for for years. It was the concept of a composite action (edit, move to somewhere else, edit something) while not leaving insert mode that just didn't fit into my idea of what vi was. Would a single undo step undo only one part of that or all of it?
The Internet is becoming spammy and bad because of Google's rules for ranking. The fact that Google favors newer content and longer pages with filler text is why people are making the content lower quality.
> [The article says] he's going to jail for the completely legal act of publishing correspondence that was sent to him

… "in order to intimidate a witness in the case".
Hmmmm. Does that do escaping and such, or are you boned when an angle bracket shows up? Plus if the nodes are already parsed in your code it kinda sucks to stringify them so the browser can re-parse them.

Not to mention holding focus and other element state, would that just get blown away and replaced with a whole new element every time? (Where react does tree reconciliation to avoid unnecessarily blowing away and replacing elements)

Maybe you’re only addressing the point about programming model, but this approach seems like it has some issues.
I have many times and you've probably seen it in the wild but I won't give myself away that easily. A Fortune 50 does this with great success.
The humble earthworm? There are thousands of species of them!

(Wikipedia says: "Currently, over 6,000 species of terrestrial earthworms are named, as provided in a species name database, but the number of synonyms is unknown." Coincidentally, there are also about 6000 species of mammal.)
Did you pronounce it Wares as in soft”wares” or to rhyme with Juarez?

When I first encountered the latter it was eye-opening.
His first study looked at how to combat climate change misinformation. At the time, a bogus petition was circulating on Facebook claiming there wasn’t enough scientific evidence to conclude that global warming was human-made, and boasting the signatures of 30,000 American scientists (on closer inspection, fake signatories included Geri Halliwell and the cast of MASH).*
The other dimension to it is he's spent most of his adult life being praised by Very Serious People for the rationality of his penchant for taking massive gambles and claiming they're just applied utilitarianism[1], why not take a few more...

[1]this is the most infamous example https://archive.ph/Yg64e
Depending on an LLM for survival is a good way to end up dead.

English Wikipedia will fit on an SD card. It's more valuable and more practical.
https://words.filippo.io/dispatches/