skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Something like IPv4, with 64 bit addressed might have been easier to push through. Eg, addresses like 123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.

IPv6 supports dotted quad notation, if that is your problem with it. You can absolutely write a 128-bit IPv6 address with the last 32 bits in 123.123.123.123 notation if that makes you feel happier. ::ffff:123.123.123.123

Technically, there's nothing stopping you from building a quick library that translates 128-bit dotted quad to IPv6 addresses. Use something like 123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123.123 if you really want to. The 4-hex digit, colon-separated notation for IPv6 wasn't designed to make it "weirder than IPv4", but to make it easier to write/mnemonically remember than just accumulating dotted quads.

> We have jumbo frames, why not jumbo addresses?

Because there's no room. IPv4 has a fixed header size (period) and almost every field is used. IPv6 had to break compatibility in some way, no matter what, to get "jumbo addresses".
Hi all, just input a description of your business and you will almost instantly get many software features required and related to that business as well as tech requirements for those features.

https://ai.clariteia.com/auth/login

It would be amazing if you tell us what you think. If it is useful not useful and what you would add or change. We have been working for a year on this and we dont know if to stop doing it fulltime and get another job or speed up.
I don't know if you've ever taken a good whiff of acetylene, but I would hate to have to live off it (maybe is it truly odorless, and its just common contamination?)
> residential solar in CA is being shut down by policy.

Residential solar is being mandated by policy, slightly reducing the incentive to build it by shaving off a portion of the per kWh charge and replacing that portion with a connection fee wouldn’t kill it even if the mandate wasn’t there. Which, again, it is.
How does this relate to ggmls bnf sampling?
> instead allow it to continue to be poorly run as a for profit enterprise

The Californian government is famous for all its well-run programs. "The trains are always on time in California", as they say.
This is one of the nicest things about Flutter. Out of the box you get most of the things you need to build an app.

There's a lot of competition for state managers but other than that you have a lot fewer choices you have to make to get started and fewer third party pieces to break on you.
Updates are live on Twitter:[0,1]

[0] https://twitter.com/U24_gov_ua

[1] https://nitter.net/U24_gov_ua
At the time there was no guidance to pilots on whether to follow TCAS or ATC.

That guidance to always follow TCAS came in because of this incident.
> Java is a common butt of jokes among C# devs....

And those of us Polyglot devs, have positive and negative arguments that go both ways.
Various darknet fora. Certainly nowhere on clearnet. There are search engines that deal with such things though I'll bet there's a 99:1 ratio of scam to legit. I have no idea how someone world go about validating what they saw.
Navigating the timezone nightmare in product development
I can make GPT4 return valid JSON simply by providing examples in the system message. This works nine times out of ten.

But it's still probabilistic, and nine times out of ten isn't good enough.

Occasionally it will hallucinate responses like this:

{"key1": "value1", "key2": "value2" for i in range(n)}

Re-prompting with the parsing error message is usually enough to get it on the second try.

But escaping double-quotes and newline characters is less reliable. Even after giving it multiple examples, it correctly escapes only about half the time.

Re-prompting for escaping errors still yields a ~50% success rate.
Howdy, my first thought after seeing this headline was basically that the Discord messenger App got hacked and user info was stolen.
If including economic externalities in the price makes goods more expensive, so be it. It's how things should be done.
Writing good Mac applications is a quite rare skill these days. Not extinct – but the share of devs that can do it is probably quite small.
To my fake name (from family and friends), anything official goes to the mailbox at my real address to which I have access to. But that rarely happens thanks to e-government. Because of presumed delivery, there's no benefit in receiving that kind of mail on paper, so I opted-in.

For e-mail, I use a domain with a catch-all mailbox. I rot13 the service name or whatever in the local-part to identify where the e-mail got leaked/sold from, which I feel like happens more often than not when buying anything from small e-shops.
I agree that many things should not be subject to the profit motive. But I’m going to put my capital at risk for no return - in the best case scenario - while the CEO of a middleman takes home $850k? No thanks.
Is it the case that black Americans are putting themselves on par with Guatemalan subsistence farmers, or that the VP is doing so?
8 minute energy is selling solar with four hours of storage to California for $40/MWh. If it's actually costing them $160/MWh, they're losing a lot of money!
One cannot make omelette without breaking a couple of eggs.
And yet, wherever we see population density increasing programs implemented like the one OP suggests, we see crime rates increase and a slumification of the area.

I think in this case, I am not erecting and burning a straw man, I am pointing out the most likely consequence of a policy which I do believe OP suggested in good faith, but did not think through the consequences.
> internally consistent limits on what the player can know

Interesting thought. Can you expand? What do you mean by this?
There's definitely a bias in the interviewing process when someone is ex fang, everybody wants to have a FANG in team to brag about it. At the same time we try to keep the interview objective: we want someone who is nice to work with.

A quick tip:

When interviewing engineers I noticed that ex FANGs tend to fail the soft sides of the interview.

The type of interviews we do are relatively easy coding exercise (implement a frontend in react to do X, implement an API, fix an existing codebase). It's way easier than any fang exercise.

The core is not really getting the exercise 100% right (bugs may creep in, especially in a stressful situation), as long as you can prove you know how to work with some (=any) frontend or backend technology and reason about your code.

Something else we evaluate is how well they work with the interviewer to solve the problem.

From my experience FANGs people tend to be great problem solvers, but poor coworkers. Try to fine-tune that in your next interview!

Best of luck!
Maybe there needs to be a separate "bunny slope" SO site, and such questions just get bounced over there where they are topical. Though I don't know who that could write good answers would spend time doing so. The people for whom those are still interesting questions are not the ones everyone else should get advice from.
I got curious and decided to check which popular websites that I use are not on a .com / .org domain.

I found: kubernetes.io , sentry.io , codepen.io , itch.io , not to mention lever.co , elastic.co and last but not the least, notion.so .
The normal workflow is to create a changelist and then have somebody patch that changelist into their client rather than accessing their client directly.
Depending on exactly what one's doing, it's easily conceivable that the exposure can be concurrent with the activity. Maybe not football, where lugging around a compressed gas tank on the field is likely impractical if not dangerous, but a sport like Formula 1 or many E-sports would likely be quite conducive for an individual, and other sports like wrestling or swimming could probably be done entirely in a room with a modified atmosphere.
Hah! Not often, but I do have to shift it around to clean the fans every few months. It's in a big ole tower case. Have 8 drives. It's a bear.
You already see this. Google "NFL oxygen masks". I'm sort of surprised I haven't heard about it in the context of shorter physical sports: I'd wonder what effect it would have on an 100m/200m/400m time or shotput distance to oxygen saturate like free divers do.
This is something we have noticed as well in our supply-chain security analysis of Github repos. It could be "build it in the open" philosophy as well that offers complete transparency and security audibility.
>It’s kind of shocking when you consider the volume of material removed from both tires and breaks over time * the number of cars.

Is it? Everyone that owns a car or has lived with some that owns a car knows that tires and brakes wear down and need replacing. We're talking a 1/4" of a tire and however thick a brake pad is. We know precisely (other than my rounding from laziness of looking it up) how much material is removed.

What point were you actually wanting to make?
Why would it be the new Java/.NET? You vastly overestimate that separate runtime as being a huge positive, it is almost indifferent to most niches where these two are most common: servers, especially on the bigger side of things. For a devops team with a proper CICD pipeline, monitoring, whatnot, installing a runtime is beyond trivial, especially that many of it is container-based.

So even if all else were equal, Go would need much much more positives to even start turning the wheel towards itself, momentum is huge in the industry (old Cobol systems are still clocking at places, even if they do so in a VM, as the hardware they are hardcoded against are too old now). Especially that it is not at all a net positive in many people's eyes:

- it is very verbose (yes, it is in fact more verbose than Java, that had been bullied by everyone forever for being verbose..)
- has terrible expressivity (java streams/.net linq)
- smaller ecosystem (java is much larger than even .net, let alone go)
- slow reflection (on the more enterprise-y end of the industry you sometimes need more dynamic workloads)

Also add that both Java and .NET has native AOT compilation, so even that small benefit you mention may not be a dealbreaker, even if those are not as smooth a rides as go's.
First of all, that would be amazing if there was a pick up guy. No, I have to bring all packages to UPS/USPS/etc. myself. They either don't do pickups or charge $$ for them (and then don't show up but still charge you for the supposed "attempt", despite evidence that nobody ever rang your doorbell).

Second, the only scannable QR code I've ever seen has only been for Amazon returns. Never seen any other retailer or shipping service support that. (I'm sure there are, but it's by far the exception rather than the rule.)

Third, scanning a code at UPS etc. requires waiting in a line behind everyone else, which is often 10+ minutes. If you print your own label, you can just drop off.
There's also https://lmql.ai/
What kind of metadata?
Believe it or not, keeping the planet nice is in their own self interests.
Writing low level things from scratch, utilizing CPUs fully, not relying on high level things that abstract away all the underlying hardware, OS and other low level details.

The Handmade [1] community is really into that stuff
Originally inspired by Casey Muratori's Handmade Hero Series [2]

[1] https://handmade.network/

[2] https://handmadehero.org/
What goalposts are you talking about? At any rate, plenty of other countries have their own rags-to-riches stories (India being the first to come to mind). I don't think such isolated/exceptional cases tell us much about what sorts of economic systems produce the best overall results, and to link back to the original post, many of them probably have their own "carrot stories" behind them too.

Oh and the school lunch program is still socialism, btw!
I mean, most weapons probably have a 1 in a billion chance (or much higher) to misfire
Related:

Zoom's TOS Permit Training AI on User Content Without Opt-Out - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37038494 - Aug 2023 (35 comments)

How Zoom’s terms of service and practices apply to AI features - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37037196 - Aug 2023 (177 comments)

Ask HN: Zoom alternatives which preserve privacy and are easy to use? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37035248 - Aug 2023 (16 comments)

Not Using Zoom - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37034145 - Aug 2023 (194 comments)

Zoom terms now allow training AI on user content with no opt out - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37021160 - Aug 2023 (510 comments)
Do you honestly believe you're making useful, helpful comments here?
I post this a lot but it's a relevant but super long read/listen - Piketty at the end of a 45 hour long audiobook (Capital and Ideology with additional web resources - charts and data) concludes we cannot change our course ala the climate/economics without changing the national constitutions of all countries to incorporate some language like this to protect future generations from the current one, current property owners have more say than voters (amending many national constitutions is pretty rare short of widespread civil unrest) because of this basic issue.
Not me. I'm a bystander.
Most databases aren't ACID compliant, and even if they can be, they're often used in a non-ACID way.

> How does accuracy work if the system is distributed and there's a partition, and two node get different data?

You don't allow writes during a partition. All nodes (or a quorum) must confirm on each write, and if that fails then a partition is detected. Everything that was accidentally written before you detected partition is thrown away. Usually you just have one writer node for simplicity.

> Fast: > Why wouldn't this be reliable?

If you prioritize reliability you will need a slower method to ensure reliability. TCP is slower than UDP so it can be reliable.
> At a minimum it should take a supermajority of a panel of judges to find a law 'unconstitutional'.

Legal or moral correctness, is not usually limited to a single judicial decision. When it is, it's remarkable enough that we learn about it early in schooling. Just because a Judge ruled to strike down a law, does not impact democracy in any way. It's a legal maneuver that will be challenged both in another legal arena and in the court of public opinion. These are the social frameworks that exist to protect against arbitrary bad actors and they matter, regardless if you think it's "OK" in isolation or not.

Everyone can agree that judges need some leeway in making decisions that are in the best public interest, regardless of the letter of the law...re: misspellings, grammar issues, ill-intent, etc. I happen to be a statist and think that the mere challenge to Federal Policy should not be discounted, because of futility. It's important to challenge governance from a distance, even today.
I've been enjoying using (and contributing to) Langroid, it's a new multi-agent LLM framework https://github.com/langroid/langroid
Activist judge rules in favor of activist Youths, propped up by their rich Activist parents, attempting their best Greta Thunberg impression - sent from my iPhone
They’ll make it up in volume.
[1975]. Funny concluding paragraph: "Both theories of anesthetic action and the evidence cited in this report suggest that the nitrogen concentration in atmospheric air causes a measurable performance decrement in man, that the "nitrogen blanket" effect suggested by Miles[10] is a real phenomenon, and that human history has proceeded under partial narcosis. Perhaps this explains the current state of world affairs"
Raw sql doesn’t compose, so it’s a no go for me except in special cases, but the tool would be a great addition to sqlalchemy.core for when those special cases occur.
But what I'm saying is: they're privatizing and selling walkability, as long as you get inside them. So walkability is no longer part of the commons. Agree with you that the parking lots contribute to sprawl, and in general v sad about it.
I am very interested to see how this may play out and whether it gets upheld (note this is just a district judge writing a single ruling). Or whether the remedy is either toothless, or unenforceable.

Because the major barrier I see is, with the climate change problem in general, no one is able to concretely and incrementally connect someone's (tiny) polluting action to actual harm to someone far down the line. (for legal liability purposes -- not saying the link doesn't exist in scientific proof)

Let me phrase it this way. For someone to have an actionable legal cause, doesn't it require that the person/entity causing some claimed harm have a particularized, concrete, connected relationship to the harm? And that their cessation of the claimed causative action would remedy the issue? <--- this is the important thing

The kids claim that <xyz> climate detrimental action is causing them harm. In most cases (some gas guzzling vehicle, coal burning plant) etc. the thing they claim is harming them, even if it were to be completely shut down, would not solve the climate problem. They would still be experiencing the harm.

So how would a law be enforceable if anyone could be sued for something that minutely adds to climate change, and their stopping their activity would produce no measurable effect on the claimant's outcome? Heck, the kids' own existence could be said to be linked to climate change.

Or, how about this -- wind farms could be sued for minutely adding to the environment / climate change problem. Or big box retail stores for causing traffic and wasteful packaging. The list could go on and on. We have opened a can of worms like if you said that denial of "the pursuit of happiness" is something that people can sue over.

What legal principle is being promulgated here? I suspect this will be subject to significant review if more cases accumulate.
This is more like a company squatting an apple.io domain and redirecting to a Sign In With Apple page. I'm surprised Discord allowed it to exist.
"This service provides links for a chat app" is a crazy sentence.
Do not do this in AWS lambda or OpenFaas. Lambda processes are reused in "warm" invocations and are only short lived in cold, infrequent use cases (read: once every > 45 minutes). This is useful when the process dies at the end of every request (in which case you're relying on the OS to do the GC for you).
Discord.io is not the same thing as discord.com
You're stating

> you're not really paid for agonizing over eloquent or great code, but just code that "gets the job done".

Somebody might interpret this statement as if nobody (in their context) should worry about writing good code. If you're writing good or bad code it doesn't matter as long as it works. Package and ship it and call it a day.

But the author addresses this:

> It's not even about good work. This is also a given. That's the default expectation, it's part of the package. The cake will be good.

Then I'd say that you're paid for "good code that gets the job done".
Hello! I'm a rising undergrad senior studying biomedical engineering at the University of Waterloo, specializing in AI. I'm looking for new grad ML engineering roles in any industry at companies series A or larger ideally, but seed for the right role.

Location: Toronto, Canada

Remote: onsite preferred, remote OK

Willing to relocate: Yes, especially US

Technologies: Python, SpaCy, Scikit-Learn, Pytorch, PySpark, AWS, github

Résumé/CV: https://github.com/dzarezankova/resume

Email: dzarezan@uwaterloo.ca or dana.zare@gmail.com

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/danazarezankova/
> Even after becoming a Facebook company, it has kept E2EE, for messagings, group chats, and calls.

According to their own claims, right? There's no way for anyone to verify that they're actually E2EE, just Meta's word that it is so.
Apple has Apple trademarked. You can do that.
How about Hawaii [1] find a way to rebuild all the homes lost so that none of those residents have to lose out? That would be the ideal. That would be fair.

[1] The Hawaiian people, government, insurance, etc.
> The environmental impact if windmills are pretty large.

Do you have any citation for this? Any source that hasn't been debunked thoroughly? Has anyone not currently under multiple indictments for fraud ever suggested this in a serious way?
I feel like even their main products are shoddy as well. How can they recommend good, relevant ads if they can't even recommend good news articles, music, or videos? If I do any search in Google on a topic, even if it's just to get a tiny bit of info about that topic, Google decides I'm interested in it and will make recommendations based on that one, single search. Or sometimes I'll buy a product and start seeing ads for similar products later. That's not good targeting IMO.
Absolutely. If I see a one method interface, I generally assume that there's a ThingDoerFunc type that implements the interface.

Likewise, (ThingDoerImplemetation{}).DoThing is a valid func reference

Hence I say there's not really a one size fits all, there are a options for different circumstances.
Lower prices themselves have a price.

You could steal everything for free, why don't you?
Legislation should step in to forbid applying new or changed ToS to data collected before that ToS was explicitly accepted by a user. Would be a PITA for the business (as they now have to track under what ToS version each piece of data is stored under), but hopefully enough of a PITA to make them treat that data as the liability it ought to be.
Validation is likely tied to reputation - such as by showing a sample to an established moderator / community member and them vouching that the data seems real.
As I know, very large fraction of Open Source project made without any plan at all.

Many, just for fun, some, for marketing reasons (as point to show in CV or some outsource companies does them to show how they code).

So, when fun ended, those projects become orphans.

Very few projects are in reality, daughters of big corporations (or Non Government Organizations, for charity), or just community version of some commercial project - they sure have some business plan of their future operations. But I think share of such projects less than 10%.

For about donations decision, I mostly see two opposite considerations:

1) "I will only pay to big charity organization, because I see there strong bureaucracy culture, which will not allow them to just steal money";

2) "I will NOT pay to big bureaucracy organization, because I see there large costs spent to just this bureaucracy, not to work, so I'll pay to separate people or to small organization, where I see working people and don't see bureaucracy".

And for about continuity, I think, for most projects enough to choose right license, I think the best is MIT/BSD, because it allow to easy make clone and even to make commercial clone, while GPL made cloning very complicated.

So, if your project have MIT/BSD (or similar) license, you don't need to think much about continuity - anybody could take your project and keep it going if need.

But if you choose GPL or similar, you MUST take care about continuity.
What is next? Old people suing young people if they fail to work enough to keep their pensions afloat? Absolutely banana republic level decision. Courts going beyond their customary boundaries is a bad idea for a democratic system stability.
Bezos Earth Fund Grants $400M for Greening Underserved Urban U.S. Communities
gambling addiction is a problem for locals as well (perhaps more so).
A sense of discord washes over me as I eat an apple in front of a computer running XWindows. A lesson about using a common English words as a trademark becomes apparent in my mind.
Carbon externalities not being reflected in the price of a good is a bug, not a feature.

It’s a market failure that needs to be rectified.