skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've thought about starting a happy hour group for remote workers, but I don't like to drink anymore
Shaking up the community right now would probably make efforts to continue Vim’s development more challenging, and make it more likely remaining contributors switch over to Neovim.
I also didn't know, some Googling led to this being the likely reference: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OneWeb#2022_Russia_controver...
Show HN: SummarizeGPT: Summarize any web page with one click
My friend and I have been working on SummarizeGPT, a Chrome extension based on chatGPT. We consume information a lot, so we built this tool that can instantly summarize any webpage's content.
It uses the latest GPT to generate quick summaries of webpages in various formats: TL;DR, Short, or Detailed. Whether you're catching up on the news, researching topics, or browsing blogs, SummariseGPT ensures you get the gist of the content without significant time investment.

We also built a contextual chat feature, allowing you to engage with any webpage and ask questions to get more information on the topic.

We would love to hear your thoughts.

Thank you!
I don't know Blazor, and it's difficult to tell from the webpage.

But I can tell you that most of my model (business logic) code is written in Clojure and compiles to both JVM and ClojureScript. In other words, I use the same code on the server and on the client. I also use EDN (meaning Clojure) as the serialization format between them, so I avoid serializing to something non-native. All this buys a lot of incremental improvement.

ClojureScript gets compiled using Google Closure compiler in "advanced" compilation mode — for those who might not know, this is not a "minifier", it's a whole-program transformer which does renaming and dead code elimination. The result is highly optimized JavaScript. I guess that's why there isn't much excitement about WebAssembly in Clojure circles — the current state of affairs is really good enough. In my experience (complex SaaS app), DOM operations are a performance bottleneck, not ClojureScript.
My prompt was:

Imagine you have to draw a SVG of an object. As a model that does not have any idea about how things look, you have to draw "blindly" - as there's no visual feedback, the only feasible tactic is to first list things components each thing consists of (e.g. for a car wheels, windows, chassis, bumpers, lights, etc.) with as much accuracy as you can, establish some constraints (e.g. in a horse legs come out of the body, ears come out of the head, and so on), and then attempt to put all of it in a SVG. This is your task for now, and I will evaluate your drawings. Give me HTML code with embedded SVG that you drew and be verbose about both the things you're going to draw and the constraints.

The first thing you will draw is a unicorn.
> value

Horseshit. It is labor who produces value, value that is directed, sold for its surplus, and earmarked for profit to the pockets of the directors.

Can the CEO build the widgets?

If no, then stop bootlicking for a CEO class of which you will never likely (be invited to) join.

The reason we see so few folks complain about subsidies for banks/business is because it is banks/business that control the channels by which we consume that information.

We know China has its firewalls. Russia too.

American “info firewalls” are all purpose built to bolden consumer fetish for consumption and hide or mute dissent against corporate bailout/subsidy.
No, some form of dark matter could have interactions that produce MOND dynamics in the correct regime. This is compatible with GR. For instance, various superfluid dark matter proposals that are being researched.
Looks like you dropped this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJmjljQP3oY
>This comment section is a super fascinating case study on the inherent flaws in human cognition. Especially when it comes to seeing patterns in random noise. The fact that some people believe that the model really has to have changed in the past few days is amazing

You need only to look at the discourse around the Tesla FSD superusers to see this: they report a glitch at an intersection one day, then believe the next day it was "fixed" by the AI.
The South African Bob Dylan. RIP
Something good for backing up my family pictures that I may or may not want to share with other family members or friends (but for sure don't want to share with random people).

Not shady is important. As is reason to believe that you are contributing to make the software you host better (as opposed to mooching off free software)
To a large extent yes, but I'd wager a lot of sites have been improved by people reading about ranking and SEO as a lot of it is just better incentives for good/bad behavior (e.g. punishing copy pasting, rewarding relevant keyword usage).
Weird. That hasn't been my experience at all.

I copied .vimrc to .config/nvim/init.vim, did a :PluginInstall and was up and running.
> I'd be very surprised if any existing variant of MOND got it right

I'm not sure why this would be surprising, MOND has made many more successful predictions than DM.
> further, you seem to be identifying AI as if it were made of LLMs.

GP is doing nothing of the sort.

LLMs are a form of AI; artificial intelligence has been around since the 60s. They are not AGI (artificial general intelligence), and no one (credible) is claiming LLMs are AGI.
That's an important point that's not always visible from the outside. I worked on implementing payroll system for a federal government and it was eye-opening in my ignorance - I always thought of "The Government" as a monolith with unified voice. nothing could be further from the truth. And different parts have explicitly different goals and prerogatives so its not even necessarily contradictory if e.g. Environmental Agency and ministry for interior development have completely opposite points of view.
Prepare for phasing out third-party cookies
Right. Adding virtual classes in weird orders does not make code more readable, and it's just a hint for the compiler anyway.
Whenever MOND comes up I feel obligated to refer interested readers to this expert astrophysicist's blog on the matter:

https://tritonstation.com/new-blog-page/
>i don't know how many contributors vim has, but i am sure they can figure out how to move forward.

Bram, for 98% of the commits/lines, plus some statistical noise.
Whenever I'm asked to help look at a specific person it's because they suspect cause or are looking for cause to get rid of them. TBH I usually find it.
Currently Archive.is is down.
9r they could get access to the requesting account and send artillery.
The std libraries in rust are sufficient for most things, but it’s definitely true there are very rich crates for networking with higher level semantics or specialized abilities (for instance async networking is generally done by bringing in tokio or something similar). In rust this isn’t considered bad, and in a lot of situations like embedded systems you don’t want or can’t use std because (for example) posix semantics aren’t available.

Personally I’m not a fan of batteries included languages because they inevitably suffer a Python heat death if standard libraries as the ecosystem improves faster without the baggage standard libraries carry intrinsically.

Hence, IMO the fact std provides a highly common and simple layer and external crates provide opinionated ergonomic interfaces is a feature, not a flaw, of rust. The crate ecosystem in rust is exceptionally good.
We've been hearing authoritarian minded people for years saying things like "actions have consequences" and "you had a choice, no one forced you to" but coercion (pushing someone to an unwanted choice using an imbalance of power/threat) is simply an illusion of freedom and fairness.
Do your mouse or (computer) keyboard offer those things? I am genuinely curious about how you think that would work.
IMO a business/manager cannot get "consent" from an employee because that employee is always under threat of being fired. Any consent given should be considered under duress, e.g. not actually consent.
We also have a lot of diagonal parking. Probably not a majority, but very common in areas where you want one-way traffic flow like fast food. Those are almost impossible to back into, since you have to turn the car against the flow of traffic to get into it, and then reverse the process when you want to get out of the spot.
60% of the girl's volleyball team is not experiencing many (or likely any) of those microcauses.
In what context do the words "unsafe Java" even begin to make sense?
Then why is the 100 kB test the slowest, with a max speed of 115 Mb/s? And no upload test gets above 250 Mb/s.

The speed is very clearly throttled by the ISP though, they sell a faster package that I don't need. I'm not complaining, I've just never seen this burst behavior anywhere else.
Did I miss the bit where they established it is on the rise? Is there evidence for that?
Yes, and this could just as well be the MP making a point of how humans would still be needed to check the inputs and outputs.

Still, it's interesting to know how far back some of the basic issues of computing go.
Berkeley’s Digital Legacy: The Evolution of BSD and Its Influence
Knowing nothing about astrophysics, synthesizing:

> binaries located within about 650 light years of Earth

> developing a new code

> below one nanometer per second squared

we see a claim that an astronomer developed new code which produces a novel result relying on some very large numbers and a very small number. Red flags abound.
https://archive.is/PCPT0
> You can live in a prime location in Manhattan for about $1000 a month if you’re willing to live in a single room apartment with a shared bathroom and a kitchen that consists of a sink, mini fridge, and microwave

Is this an apartment, or just a room with a locked door?
>The original post hurts my head with its bad logic.

Huh? What "original post"? This is an experiment, today the model drew something resembling a unicorn. Tomorrow we will see how the experiment goes again. I see no associated analysis, so what makes your "head hurt".
> it amuses me that a language so obsessed with getting rid of symbols and looking like pseudocode decided that such cumbersome, obtuse and ugly looking boilerplate was just fine.

100 times this! I have always wondered about that.
> And yet they are both animals, often get treated as less than most people, the shepherd dog only gets the proverbial scraps.

Yes, but focusing on those factors gives you an incomplete understanding of the dog’s place on the farm. At the end of the, day the dog is helping the farmer extract value from the sheep. Indeed, the dog’s very specialized skills wouldn’t have much value outside the context of the farming enterprise. That means the dog’s interests are much more aligned with the farmer’s than the sheep. His unique role, and relatively comfortable position, wouldn’t exist outside the value-extractive context of the farm.

> And thus we can differentiate those of these people who are part of the upper class from those who aren’t by wether they get an actual share of the value they produce, or merely scraps. Wether they are compensated as equals, or as useful tools

Facebook engineers building the infrastructure the company uses to extract monopolistic profits from consumers are receiving a share of the value. The actual value creation ultimately comes from someone making shoes in a factory in China, which sells them to Nike, which uses Facebook advertising and branding to sell them to consumers for far more than they’re worth. Yes, he’s a “useful tool” for the shareholders, but so are the senior executives (besides Zuck). Their ability to command $500,000 salaries or $1 million salaries, or $10 million salaries doesn’t exist outside the context of these enormous monopolistic profits.

You’re getting hung up on “equality” but being in the same class doesn’t mean you’re equal. In a feudal society, knights may be quite lowly compared to a high ranking landowner. They’re “useful tools.” But I’m not talking about equality of rank, I’m talking about interests and incentives. On that front, the knights have fundamentally different interests and incentives than the serfs. Whatever resentment they might have toward higher ranking nobility, they still reap the benefits of the feudal structure. The my would be much worse off outside that structure.
Amazon removes books ‘generated by AI’ for sale under author’s name
Morally the equipment and services belong to the employer so to assume you can use them for personal reasons is a big assume. Whenever I'm asked to look at someone I always tell the owner to consult with a HR professional before using anything directly.

Nobody cares about your personal business. Just don't do dumb stuff like watching porn at work, email company data to your personal account. Or sit watching Netflix all day.
Has there been a driver release from AMD since geohot had a call with their CEO? Otherwise I don’t see how you can attribute this entirely to him.
Why Not SQLite? (2021)
Yeah, that's what I mean. All the groups have downloaded the same dataset from Gaia, and yet have come to completely opposite conclusions based on the analysis techniques, filtering, etc.
I assume they are referencing the fact that Oneweb's network architecture is based on 3GPP standards that allow the network to be operated with capabilities matching those of terrestrial carrier-grade cores. There's in theory a lot less friction to using OneWeb for backhaul supporting 'off grid' LTE/5G RANs than there is using something like Starlink.
Speaking from experience as someone who is paid for SEO optimization there's a list a mile long of things Google says "doesn't work" or you "shouldn't do" but in fact work very well and everyone is doing it.
the blockchain doesn't really add anything

well, that is what i am trying to understand. for now i don't think that is right. it doesn't make sense to put everything directly on the chain. that would be to costly. not every computation needs to be trusted. i can still implement some checks to verify that computations are ok without the computation needing to run on the chain itself. but the chain can provide a mechanism to manage the resources (who gets to use how much and where, and who pays for it) which would be more difficult to do without a chain.
Developers shouldn’t hardcode UI components. Use remote ones instead
Hi HN! I'm Andrea, founder and contributor of Theta (https://github.com/buildwiththeta/buildwiththeta), an open source platform for designing server driven UIs in a visual way, with direct connection to the front-end and instant updates.
We are currently in beta, with a small but growing community of over 2k developers and designers.

Theta connects no-code UIs with front-end apps via API, but without the need for an Internet connection. You can test the UI and text copy via AB testing and update each version of apps with a specific UI.

Of course, we have collaboration within the same project, so it makes it easier for designers, developers, and product managers to work together.

Because we are at the end of the day an API with a JSON-UI translator, and we do not deal with logic but only with "static" UI, we are moving to support several declarative frameworks:
- Flutter, already available with support for iOS, Android, Web and Desktop
- Swift UI, available soon, with support for iOS, VisionOS and macOS
- Compose Multiplatform, available during the fall, with support on all platforms
- Typescript, available during the fall, for websites and web apps

Our goal is to improve communication between designers, developers, and product managers by removing the step of creating UI components via code, using design directly.

For product managers, on the other hand, it is a useful tool for experimenting with UIs so they can improve conversions through A/B tests that can be set visually from the platform.

The best way to start using Theta is by following our docs at https://docs.buildwiththeta.com and from our youtube channel https://youtube.com/@buildwiththeta.
You can see a short demo here: https://youtu.be/oFed0NIqBZI

We also have pricing dedicated for teams, which you can read about here: https://buildwiththeta.com/pricing

I would love if you can give me feedback, as it is important to improve the product on a technical, usability and functionality level.
I would love to.

If you have any questions, I am here!
If you're willing to drink bleach because the internet told you to, then you had very serious problems before LLMs and you'll still have serious problems if we ban LLMs. The internet is full of incredibly harmful health and dietary advice that is 100% human-generated.

Developers have a duty to users, but that duty is not Hippocratic; we have no obligation to only release products that are absolutely safe under all circumstances. My nailgun will fire a 4" nail through my skull without hesitation, but I'm not outraged by that fact. I don't demand a nailgun with a complex skull-detection system, or a moratorium on all nailgun development until we're confident that a nailgun will never drive a nail through something that it shouldn't. The manufacturer warns me "this is a nailgun, it'll put a nail through damned near anything including flesh and bone, so don't be a dummy" and society recognises my right to take that risk.

I'm completely fine with an LLM recipe generator that, if asked, will create a recipe for a bleach and rat poison cocktail. It'd be nice if the model was a bit more refined, but I'm fine with an unrefined model so long as it gives a suitably prominent disclosure to the effect of "this is a large language model, it isn't human and has no common sense, so apply your own common sense to any output it gives".
1st paragraph is correct , 2nd not quite - Matt Cutts was a distinguished engineer (looking after web spam at Google) who took on the role of the search spokesperson - it’s that role Danny took over as “search liaison”
These extremely low-acceleration regimes are precisely where the issue is, and why dark matter and MOND were both developed as competing frameworks for understanding discrepancies vs our current understanding. It's the only regime where these questions can be probed and investigated.
No, Neovim is not a superset of Vim. Vim has things that Neovim doesn't have and vice-versa.
> … actively used by the NSA …

So the NSA would purposefully embed an exploitable bug in a cipher they themselves use?

> … it would be about compromising security on the software level rather than the encryption level

Those are two very different things. A cipher could very well be exploitable. What you are talking about is the implementation.

In other words, a vulnerable cipher would be exploitable regardless of the implementation.

It is not the case, though. They tried to deploy their own protocol on top of a well known cipher.
>You could pass it to an image recognition model and see record the degree to which it thinks it is...

We don't care what another algorithm "thinks". We want to see if what it draws is humanly interpretable as a unicorn.
> your controversial opinions should be irrelevant to work

That is, unfortunately (or fortunately if you're that kind of person), not how things work for a large amount of jobs. If you have that scarlet letter, you're shut out of a lot of positions, even when that history _shouldn't_ matter.
Parasitic Plant Feeds on Mushrooms
The Battle of Hostomel Airport, Kyiv Ukraine
No share/record/export/save button?
Neovim remove set compatible (hardcodes set nocompatible).
Vim support the POSIX vi via that option.
Whether Taiwanese Mandarin is a separate language or not is a matter of opinion. Delving further into this debate will not lead to an interesting discussion as the definition of what constitutes a language is ultimately blurry. So I'm not making a claim either way, just an observation that you can't have it both ways: if the languages are separate, whatever goes on in China is irrelevant. If it is the same language, then the way it is spoken in Taiwan is no less "standard." It seems you agree with the latter, so let's leave it at that.

I don't think the website is trying to "emphasize the differences," just point out the issues with Google Translate: namely that the output for "zh-tw" does not reflect the language actually used by people in Taiwan, and to that end it betrays the trust of the user. Of course it only lists where the problems are, so it's not a balanced view by definition. It focuses on what needs to be fixed.

In particular, as similar as the two languages or variants are to each other, nearly all the vocabulary relating to modern technologies developed separately, and is fairly distinct. I've never tried it but I can imagine a Google-translated text heavy on computer-related vocabulary can easily end up being unintelligible to a Taiwanese, which constitutes poor quality of service on Google's part.

Taiwan is a separate market for Google, and from the business perspective they would do best not to alienate their users there. Of course it is a free service with no reasonable expectation of quality. But if someone went to the trouble of listing all the issues, the problem might be worth addressing even for purely reputational reasons. I read through the whole word list and I'd say it's at least 95% accurate. Frankly, I'm surprised it sparked such a debate.

As for "Mainland China," you are technically correct about the scope. The term has its use in certain contexts if one is aiming to be very precise (or pedantic). But here it's tangential to the discussion.
The user is the human in the loop. They're providing (part of) the prompt and they're deciding what to do with the output.
Thats even worse for autonomous cars, there is so such data and noise there is no way to reproduce the issue, it's complete chaos.
Whereas with a LLM if we control the seed we can 100% reproduce the same result
We’re pretty sure the nondeterminism is batching + mixture of experts + contention for specific experts
Also, rents numbers are usually not given after adjusting for inflation. It makes breaking record a phenomenon you’d expect, similarly how Hollywood keeps constantly breaking its blockbuster records.
Why wouldn’t this just lower their domain authority
Explore what is product life cycle, examples and different stages. Also, learn how agile software development can augment the PLC model.
Similarly the logic flips on the pay increase depending on what end it is.

When the CEO gets a $5 million raise some will say "well now he will work more" (aka it's good)

When the laborer gets a $5 raise these people say "well now he will work less!" (aka it's bad)

This is consistent in their head because their fundamental belief is in a hierarchy as if it's by divine providence.

It also ties wages to morality. They imagine the rich are virtuous while the poor are immoral so the money goes to different ends.

It sounds so old timey and I agree, so call people out on it when you still hear it.
I like the method chain and find it very readable (and a good guarantor of typed output in the absence of strict types, if you use something like Typescript to lint it). But I don't see how the choice between that or a pipe operator has any impact on whether function main() should be your program's entry point. Unless your program is going to be an endless loop, e.g. a Nodejs server or else a game, I don't know why you'd want to saddle yourself with a main() every time it runs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmSO2cz2ozQ
> To make things weirder, the article claims that only mobile networks are affected. I wonder why that is.

This is easier, maybe, to follow where is going a wire than a wave.
There is a csv export and sharing to twitter and facebook for me, right nect to pause/retest
"sooo many" is a technical term?

"Sooo many" compared to what? Did you scrutinize the equivalent of Java's SDK in Rust + extra crates to get the same functionality?

Do you include things like unrelated package bugs, like log4j bugs?