skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
SpaceX is literally US's only domestic way to send humans to ISS right now
Nice and clean, great work!

If you don't mind me asking, does your energy bill take a huge blow because of this? I had a modest homelab set up and had to start shutting things off due to how much it costs to keep it running

I apologize if I missed this info in the blog!
And that's kind of the point of the rule :).

>39. (alternate formulation) The three keys to keeping a new human space program affordable and on schedule:

> 1) No new launch vehicles.

> 2) No new launch vehicles.

> 3) Whatever you do, don't develop any new launch vehicles.

Given that SpaceX wanted to make a more affordable launch vehicle, they obviously needed to design one. But it certainly didn't make their human space flight programme go faster compared to past endeavours.
https://sourcehut.org/ fits this pretty well
The rumour is not true, despite reddit's insistence. Windows exposes it's version is a series of numbers, and even if it didn't, Windows 9 could have returned "Windows Nine", "Window v9" or loads of other things.
Ggml / llama.cpp has a lot of hardware optimizations built in now, CPU, GPU and specific instruction sets like for apple silicon (I'm not familiar with the names). I would want to know how many of those are also present in onnx and available to this model.

There are currently also more quantization options available as mentioned. Though those incur a performance loss (they make the model faster but worse) so it depends on what you're optimizing for.
I knew you'd show up and say this. CIQ's CEO claims to have founded Rocky and is the current president of RESF, is Rocky's most prominent sponsor, and Rocky's recent moves have been in the same direction that CIQ requires in order to survive. Regardless of direct control or not, Rocky's financial incentives align with CIQ's.

As you so point out your bias, it would be really nice if you didn't speak on behalf of your employer and let others make their own conclusions without hearing from those biased.
If you have countervailing data, present it, but it's not reasonable for a thread to demand evidence of someone, see the evidence, and then attempt to refute that evidence with supposition.
Ok, then it was clear from the beginning that all this "open source" effort will go MySql route eventually
ERX here. The EdgeMax line is still rock solid and have incredible value for the price.
It's a rounding error in some of the budgets that startups deal with. It becomes closer to the situation with the Long Now, which is a clock to last 10,000 years. With LLMs, even the moderation becomes an fixture in the project that can endure. With Solar and a GPU and some Internet.
Until you get to wet bulb saturation extremes, you can survive heat as long as you have a supply of water. Cold temperatures, on the other hand, will kill you straight up.
Vim has soul. It is that chisel you inherited from your grandpa that you keep using. It fits well in your grip and is comfortable, even though it lacks the soft rubber that the new ones in the store have. It's a tool with its own history.

Reading the comments here, it seems that the hacker's mentality still lives on. The new young billion-dollar company will be replaced in another 10-20 years. Vim lives on. I wish to build a Vim of my own one day.
I honestly think they should fire every single PM on that team. Like literally just keep the engineers and give them no more direction than make it better and designers need to approve any UI changes.

That's it.
I think if you pay, you'll get more
Very unfavorably. Mostly because the ONNX models are FP32/FP16 (so ~3-4x the RAM use), but also because llama.cpp is well optimized with many features (like prompt caching, grammar, device splitting, context extending, cfg...)

MLC's Apache TVM implementation is also excellent. The autotuning in particular is like black magic.
Uranium, the radioactive stuff? That sounds excellent to be using in glassware!
They don't want people who might have done something embarrassing in their past, because foreign adversaries might try to blackmail them with that.
And then the step up to induction is even more so a no brainer. That way, just the benefits of gas (fast hot, fast cool) are added on top of electric. Without the cleaning hassles.
Doesn’t seem to offer much over just using clang.
Yeah, I think he does mean adaptive. The point is that -- although the behaviors are certainly mal-adaptive in resource-rich stable countries -- they might actually be highly adaptive in other situations.
Not just movement east west or north south but also births, deaths, immigration, and emigration.

Also of note, the quadrants aren’t balanced. You could have 1x in the northwest, 2x in the northeast, 2x in the southwest, and 1x in the southeast.
but the other part is even when they replace services the new one lacks the same features or ux that made the original special.

inbox vs gmail
play music vs youtube music
I do not follow either of your statements. I do not know what you would use as an example for your first sentence. I do not know what you are trying to communicate with the last two sentences.
How does one even find something like this? Let alone prove that this is the first counterexample. That number looks to be in the order of the age of the universe in millionths of a quectosecond!!
All that and no mention of IPv6? At least get the basics down first.
>but the East Coast Ivies are still heavily WASPy,

>and it's largely due to things like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Register

These are very likely not true especially the second part but since specific ethnicity is not tracked it's much harder to disprove. But I would wager this is is not true at all.
2 machines https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16076041
This is very cool! I really hope the ONNX project gets much more adoption in the next months and years and help reduce the fragmentation in the ML ecosystem.
Why combinator, Y?
What? Project founders and software authors might not always be around?
I'm somewhat confused about what you mean by "expose your backend data model to your front end(s)", since you can disable introspection in production.
> it's also a sign that you fear your offering is not competitive enough without the rule change.

Agreed. It can't mean anything other than that you can't compete on a fair playing field, so you have to add restrictions to lock customers into your service. That you wrote the service is irrelevant since you licensed it as a gift to the world. It's exactly what Free Software was designed to thwart, and exactly what open source was designed to preserve.
> which I believe would be very low or non-existent

Only because your sample size are people who've attended YC.

Ask all startups whether they think YC is worth it and the percentage will be significantly higher. Because if you're an experienced founder then the benefits versus dilution equation will be far different than someone who is straight out of college.
I'm curious what the total cost of all this is. My reservation of rack mounted setup has been cost of hardware.
> Come to think of it, why is SUSE considered as a serious replacement for RHEL and not Ubuntu?

SLES and RHEL are somewhat similar, in that they both use the RPM package format, and they both have a 10 year support lifecycle. They are not entirely compatible though. They also make management software that is supposed to be as interoperable as possible with competitor distributions.

Anyways, last month SUSE announced they would be making an actual RHEL fork, so that's the real reason they are joining this new partnership -- it's not related to SLES, but a new distro they are making.

As for Ubuntu -- it is often touted as an alternative to RHEL. However, people don't like the weird ways in which Ubuntu diverges from the rest of the Linux community (Snap, LXD, ufw, etc.), so some attention is diverted towards Debian and RHEL, which are more focused on packaging software that is already proven. Red Hat does their innovation in Fedora, waits a few years to see if it catches on, then implements it in RHEL. This tends to have a greater degree of success than pushing it suddenly on users like Ubuntu does.
No it’s not, you’ve got no idea what you’re talking about. There isn’t an ‘appendicitis’ diet
Fearmongering to squeeze out more funding for NASA.

NASA's problem is the the US doesn't have the spare readies that it had back in 1969.
It’s been conjectured by some researchers that maybe this is the case, particularly for infants. But there’s very little evidence for it. As far as I’m aware there have been no studies that are able to statistically distinguish between people with and without an appendix in terms of actual heath outcomes
I'm not going to look a gift horse in the mouth. And tbh, these days, with whatever bad medicine google feels like foistering on us this week, Oracle are truly beginning to look more and more like the "good guys".

As much as any large evilcorp can be the good guys anyway.
No. It is slower than MiG-31
HashiCorp Licensing FAQ
> MacOS was lacking quality apps

this is also spectacular revisionism .. multiple categories of desktop software appeared first on the Macintosh computer i.e. they were invented for mass production on the Macintosh. Photoshop is not the only one like that. What happened quickly was MSFT expanding with contractual license agreements into huge markets and making one of the founders into The World's Richest Man for more than twenty years without fail.

MSFT had a famous mistreatment of graphic designers or other commercial artists, in complete opposite to Apple where the creative people thought they were the center of the media world. Some people do not take visual arts, print or the like as anything but "toy", apparently. You are reading type right now.

At any rate, there is a saying that says something like "Washington DC, Los Angeles Hollywood, Silicon Valley -- they all have intense inner groups and they all think that they are the center of the world. Of course the world is bigger than that" MSFT delivered desktop computers to the world.
Customer buys cloud service with unpredictable pricing. Gets bitten by high prices. Switches to (new!) cloud service with predictable pricing. Prices are lower.

Also, it sounds like they could save money by not using cloud.
Lol I get sym 1G/1G from my ISP and a free static IP address for less than Comcrash offers for their 25/10 service in my area...

The catch? _No IPv6 support whatsoever_
Realistically you could get that number 6x smaller, because people could voluntarily cut their usage from 30kwh to 15 when the power is out, and 1.5 days of power is probably overkill when 12 hours would get you through 99% of power out scenarios in America.

On top of that, when the grid is functioning normally, you could use the batteries to get cheaper electric rates with time of use pricing.
He was an extremely influential artist and his time with The Band was legendary of course - but his solo work is also certainly worth investigating especially "Contact from the Underworld of Redboy".
I don't think you can discuss hurricane electric dropping connection to kiwifarms, without discussing the possible reasons.

It wasn't a software glitch; it was an intentional action.
Very much (2012).
You can't "revive" it because it is not dead
Ask a GNURadio hacker and it can debug the issue in minutes.
This is why I always make it a point to tell people how much I appreciate them and why (when I do, I mean). It can be awkward at first, but I’ve developed a good self-deprecation that lets me excuse myself for being gushy (“I might start crying; I’m a crier!”), and that disarms people for the most part. I think it’s really important that we let people know how much we value them and why we honor/respect them when we do. Because most of us do wander through life in a cloud of unknowing and uncertainty.
I really do not get this. We have twice a 300 euros AEG in two kitchens already running 10 years. How many pits do you cook on simultaneously?
I'm in the UK, getting 500MB symmetrical installed tomorrow, could have ordered 900MB for £2 per month more.
You're thinking of the CEO.
Given it’s a corporate blog and YC will still be on the cap, what’s the point of the leading question?
The number of layers added to modern programming and computer systems has gone up significantly since the 80s. It's sensible to claim that a kid from the 80s had far less to learn to be effective in the world of the 80s, than a 20s kid would need today.
In essence, you need to enumerate and sum up all possible ways everything can happen in a very little piece of the universe that corresponds to the "reaction center" of the experiment. All possible ways you can pop out particles from the vacuum that interacts with your experimental particle and pop back into the vacuum etc. It's a totally impossible calculation to do in full, so a large chunk of theoretical high energy physics is about finding shortcuts to do that.

All these ways contribute to the reaction probabilities (which are the ones you get a number on at the end of the day).

The muon g-2 experiment is so interesting because there is a vast number of pretty exotic particles and particle pathways that have to be taken into account, and if our understanding of any of those is wrong, or there are (even more interestingly) particles that can pop out and contribute that we don't even know about, it will show up in the muon g-2 number as compared to the theoretical calc.
Not a physicist but basically yes. Most quantum mechanics calculations involve the path integral[0], a sort of sum of all possible Feynman diagrams[1] that an interaction could involve and the more of these you involve the more accurate you hope to be. Further the field theory that they're calculating within is generally an effective field theory[2] which is known to be an incomplete approximation of the system it's modelling but "close enough" for the energies involved. That approximation costs accuracy as you get closer to the energy cutoff you included but you included it because you don't know what happens above it so it's not like you can just not do that. Depending on how renormalization[2] is done in that effective theory the constants involved can have their values affected.

In this particular case you're also looking "closer" at an interaction than you can model with the particle intuition. For simple electron/photon scattering you can pretend that things are particles and use that intuition to guide you but when you start looking really close at things you can't really do that anymore and have to work with fields and waves in a way that belies normal physical intuition. Part of the way that manifests is "virtual particles" popping in and out of existence (really field interactions that aren't really particle-like but with the virtual particle trick can be modelled almost as if they were). These interactions do affect the real world and the way they affect it depends on the fields involved. If there's some unknown 4th generation of lepton for instance a virtual one of those could interact with the experiment, but since you didn't know about it you didn't include it in your calculation.

Also depending on how you're calculating things you aren't just saying "1+2=3", you're saying "1±theory error + 2±theory error = 3±theory error" so you end up with a range of calculations. That might manifest as "well if there's a graviton then I need to calculate it this way but if there isn't then I need to calculate it this way, and we don't have experimental evidence to guide me one way or the other".

Lastly, QFT is quantum mechanics + special relativity and I think it goes without saying that both of these are just detailed, difficult fields with difficult maths involved. So you're taking an already difficult field and since you're trying to be accurate out to a lot of decimal places while interacting with messy real-world experiments you're forgoing all of the nice physics-class "massless particle in a spherical box" approximations that normally let you skip over all of that trouble.

See https://indico.fnal.gov/event/7309/contributions/101335/atta... for some lecture notes on the base problem.

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feynman_diagram
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_field_theory
3: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization
RIP

‘Up on Cripple Creek’ was my first explicit introduction to them. After buying their 1969 self titled album on a whim, my jaw dropped from hearing the original sample from GangStarr’s “Beyond Comprehension” off their 1990 ‘Step in the Arena’. That isolated drum roll and guitar lick is so mystical. I could listen to those brief 3 seconds on loop for hours.
It doesn't have to be a literal conspiracy. Why do you reject the possibility that people and organizations are reacting to very real and concrete financial incentives which clearly exist?
Exactly. Those 50 wireless clients must be fed Internet while their 50 subjugated humans eat BBQ and prioritize device interactions over human ones. (I’m exaggerating of course! At least you are having gatherings — better than many of us!)
ONNX is a format. There are different runtimes for different devices... But I can't speak for any of them.

> specific instruction sets like for apple silicon

You are thinking of the Accelerate framework support, which is basically Apple's ARM CPU SIMD library.

But Llama.cpp also has a Metal GPU backend, which is the defacto backend for Apple devices now.
You can buy Swedish knäckebröd in many US grocery stores. Look in the aisle with the cheese & crackers style crackers, it's labeled "Wasa crispbread" (google those words for pictures). The multigrain is good.

Trader Joe's carries Norwegian dried flat bread of some sort, but it's different. More seeds and way more dense.

However, you absolutely cannot get good rye bread anywhere in the western US. I've never spent time on East coast, maybe one of the immigrant-heavy areas might have it. Whatever is labeled as rye bread here (Jewish rye, Russian rye, ...) is different from the rye bread in the Nordics.
I agree. I see ChatGPT as similar to music synthesizers. They enable creativity. Creativity in novel ways as well.

What if you want to express yourself with a violin sound but don't know how to play one?
But how can you ever have a "fair playing field" when some competitors are a thousand times larger than you?
I bet $20 they are gonna remove the pistol requirement from this.
So if a company is losing money they should just fail with no chance to change direction?
In 1969, CP/M (and the 8080) didn't exist, and the first PDP-11 was released in 1970. I'd think they would have started out with something like a PDP-8 (or the LINC-8 variant). I'd hope that computing hardware has been updated multiple times over the lifetime of the ship.
since the container is executed in a VM, the I/O performance is significantly worse compared to a container
that is run natively. For compiled languages or for any process that creates a lot of files, this impact can be
significant since the overhead can be up to 100x of what you’re experiencing natively

Uhhhhhhh. I don't know what VM you're using... but if the I/O in your VM is 100x slower than the host, you can fix that. It should not take a minute and a half to write a single file.
> If programming it was a school project for an 80s kid, might as well try to make its replacement a school project for a 20s kid. If a kid did it back then, the integration can't be that hard.

You need to find a decision-maker to agree to the liability of letting some kid implement a system today. What if something goes wrong and all the children roast alive or something? Then the parents would sue. It'll never happen today, people are terrified of being wrong so no is always the easiest answer.

Also, yes integration would be hard today. This same pinhead decision maker would require it to run on Windows for "support" and "security".

That 80s Amiga is probably incredibly reliable and robust with its real multi-tasking OS and doesn't require "security patches".

What a shame Commodore dropped the ball on it, it was ahead of its time.
I hate to say it but this feels inevitable. We've accepted that the requirement (legally!) of a public company is to deliver the maximum possible returns to investors, and as such, employees become a cost center to optimize away, and just generally, anything that negatively impacts the quarterly report must be eliminated, even if that thing is the only thing that will keep the next quarterly report in the black.

Quarterly scope for fiscal data is one of the most short-sighted decisions humans have ever done. Expecting quarterly up-and-to-the-right, where simple sustenance is not enough, but profit must grow quarterly, on a planet with finite resources in an economy with finite money, is a guaranteed, zero-exceptions, recipe for failure, by definition.
MIT didn't want to press charges but the actual copyright owners (the publishing firms did) so it went ahead.
Sorry for a confusion. I’m a designer behind refreshments of Zulip UI. UI update is in progress. Slowly parts of Zulip UI are replaced after careful internal test if people feel that is a good thing.
So far there are small changes. The bigger parts like compose box, left sidebar, message typography, marketing website and mobile apps are coming.

You can participate in evaluation of redesigns if you join zulip dev chat.
Cost of electricity is an other factor to consider
Here's some more info why you might use this instead of plain clang.

https://andrewkelley.me/post/zig-cc-powerful-drop-in-replace...
We're safe from this nonsense here in the Netherlands ever since KPN tried to blocked Skype on their network and upset legilators, and the EU has had net neutrality law for a while now. However, with most of the internet being developed over in the USA, the internet as a whole gets better with these features.

I haven't caught any real ISP here (only train/public WiFi). I don't trust Dutch ISPs to follow the law so I do run these checks every now and then.

At least one American mobile carrier overtly advertises "5G" with "unlimited data" followed by "DVD quality (480p) standard" video quality, but not every carrier in every country will be that direct.
Replication Architecture for a Vector Database
Does anyone know the feasibility of converting the ONNX model to CoreML for accelerated inference on Apple devices?
> In other words, free as in freedom, but not free as in beer.

That's the Free Software slogan, not open source. The only relationship between the two is that open source can easily be relicensed into Free Software (or proprietary, or whatever.)

There's nothing in open source about friendliness or collaborative development. I'm not forced to take your advice or contributions just because I'm open source, so how could that have anything to do with it?
Solar panels are almost exclusively made in China now using coal.

The carbon economics of EVs were and still are based on older EU solar production that relied on natural gas for energy. Nobody has done the recalc.

There's hardly a net benefit now.
> WTF is your angle here?

I think this more applied to you. You actually invested time to write a paper about brainwallets because some people don’t understand or know how to use them properly. The paper is not logical, if it was then a small POC I know about is all of them, which obviously it isn’t, you can’t find serious people’s brainwallets, they would be salted in a way that it’s hopeless to crack.

You claim brainwallets are fundamentally unsafe, which honestly is total nonsense if you understand them and how they work.

I’m gonna guess you’re a ban Bitcoin type because it’s… wrong or whatever.
I'll take that Lenovo M73 Tiny off your hands ;)
Or another way to look at it: software that volunteers can't/won't develop and thus will only exist if a company can sustain itself vs. software that volunteers can and will develop.