skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This is not a web app running on an AWS virtual machine in Ohio.

This also does not come from Magic Unicorn Land. Think of the sysadmins and developers in poor conditions who have to support the machines and networks. The electricity spent. The cycles on server gear. All for a throwaway comment on HN that you will forget within a few minutes.
If you're looking for the absolute top speed, it's not as fast as C++ or rust. Assembly functions can't be inlined, for example. But go allows you to control your memory structures and that gets you good cache utilisation, compared to, say java. Go is plenty fast enough for most applications.
I'll take a look, thx
Why not take a screenshot of the CF error and send it to the website owner? It would freak me out if I thought a significant number of my website's users were being blocked by CF.
A straight up G
Im not a commenter but you tone is quite arrogant.
What does a product of many Gaussian matrices converge to?
> does this prevent them from being sued for any of it, where they could have been successfully sued otherwise?

As I understand it, anyone can sue anyone for anything. What matters is convincing a judge/jury that you have been wrongfully harmed by the defendant. So if someone can make a good enough case for damages stemming from this data collection, then they can successfully sue.

This doesn't prevent them from suing, but it makes their case significantly weaker if the defendant can argue that the user agreed to have their data collected.
I don't avoid reading news, I just avoid reading it continuously. If there is an ongoing story I am interested in (like the war in Ukraine) I check in on it once every couple of days, via sources I have some trust in. Eventually, I read a long-form article about it, but those take a few weeks or months to be written. What I don't do is check social media every 15 minutes, or watch 24/7 cable news. I think obsession is the delivery mechanism for problems like anxiety, depression, or radicalization, not the news itself.
I've seen the API, and it's not either of those things if you've already used a structured logger?
When they don't voluntarily answer the question, you know the answer.
The US is a very homogeneous country. I live in a very liberal part of it.

There are probably places with similar problems although I can't name any. Can you?
that's quite a political map overlay there
This line of reasoning is utterly alien to me. If your types add mental overhead, you’re doing something wrong. You should be able to rely on the typechecker to check invariants for you, decreasing mental overhead. You have to think about types anyway, especially in an untyped language, where you can’t rely on the typechecker.
> Because there are quite a lot of people in this world who speak Chinese but not English, while nobody speaks only emoji.

And even more people using emojis. Fundamentally, as a native speaker of a European language, there is no meaningful distinction between using fancy image characters and fancy characters that look like symbols. The fact that someone somewhere is using them or not is not very relevant.

> To be clear, I'm not against emoji or Unicode in general. I just dislike the way they seem to be showing up in commit messages and the like as attributes.

Right, but then that’s something you solve by policing the commit messages in your projects. Not by policing how other people you’ll never meet express their ideas or emotions.
Support for AWS us-east-1 Region
Regarding the barrier-to-entry. First off, I don't want to read posts made by people who pay to publish to a Blockchain. I'm fairly convinced their posts don't matter. Secondly, I don't have any reason to try out the service (or visit it continually) if interaction costs money.

I think you're creating a system where motivated and financed scammers will have more power over the network than the average user.
Digging a wider tunnel requires a bigger tbm, which adds little to the whole cost. Hs2 put out a paper, though I don’t think it compares sizes. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/...
The NYC example is terrible, because the new part of the tunnel is only short and the whole project costs a lot does not mean each mile of the tunnel costs that much.

I was first asking why they thought small tunnels are better, is that purely on financial grounds? Low cost, low benefit.
> Vulnerabilities can be fixed

Not always the damage.
+1
Also on Firefox on Android.
A Climate Solution in the Skies
> And people say chatgpt is ready to replace doctors, lawyers and programmers

Do be aware that some people have extremely low opinions of doctors, lawyers and programmers. :)
GPT = Gangster Pre-training Transformer
Agreed. The same goes for the 3rd party "data privacy" popups which simply hide a long list of opt-outs several layers deep in a Vendors list. I refuse to use such sites and I let them know by email.
I really wish Stripe would just make something like this. Just the bare minimum necessary to host Checkout for products entered in your Stripe dashboard. I wonder if they can’t due to some onerous clause in their agreement with Shopify.
now i have to use a specific browser and setup the wallet... uh huh. you have high levels of something i call "optimistic friction". i appreciate the gumption though.
It's not at all legalese. Part of the reason the whole publication is so long is that each of the justices was fully aware that it'd be read by law students, interested citizens, etc. for decades to come and wrote out in longhand what legal scholars could just assume as background knowledge.

Each section was written to persuade the reader that the author's position is correct, and nobody gets appointed to the US Supreme Court without being really damn good at putting together a clear persuasive essay. These are extremely smart people with a small staff of very smart editors trying to convince you their position is the only right one; it's not like an insurance contract or EULA designed to "baffle 'em with bullshit".

If you've got a few hours to spare and even a modest level of background knowledge about American history and the current controversy involving racial quotas it's very readable. If it leaves you more ambivalent than before you started it's probably because they're arguing over a genuine public controversy where intelligent people operating in good faith can come to very different conclusions.
> most useful thing ever ... seed life on another planet

I don't intend to change your mind on this point, but I'll just say I disagree (:

Why not pave over national parks and build more cities? Seems "useful"...

This is very much a "Red Mars / Green Mars" sort of debate (see the books by Kim Stanley Robinson; not that I'm a huge fan, but it's very topical).

You'll always have some people who want to forcibly mold the world/universe into something else, and some people who want to preserve what's there, and a whole spectrum in between.

If nothing else, once you do contaminate/bless Mars with life, there is no going back. So, it seems reasonable to take advantage of the unique opportunity to study it before crossing that line.

Just my 2¢
Fine-tune SDXL with your own images
>1: The Mark Twain adage "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes."

"The one who first states a case seems right: Until the other comes and cross-examines." Proverbs 18:17

Reserving judgement until one has all (or, at least, most) of the facts is the first step towards preventing the spread of lies.

"Always tell the truth. Or, at least don't lie." --Jordan Peterson

Humans are very quick to spread rumors, gossip, half-heard/misheard 'facts', uncorroborated/unsourced/unevidenced stories, etc because we have an innate desire to tell others something "secret". To feel like we are in a position of authority or power because we know something you don't.

And sometimes we can tell the truth that looks especially bad.

My dad likes to tell this story from when he was about 12.

One Monday morning, his little brother walked into Kindergarten with a giant black eye. His teacher asked what happened, and he replied, "my brother hit me in the head with a baseball bat."

This, of course, was obvious cause for alarm.

So they pulled my dad out of class and asked him what happened to his little brother, to which he replied, "I hit him in the head with a baseball bat."

As they were getting ready to call their dad for a parent-teacher conference - possibly even to consider pressing charges on behalf of the injured child, they went and found their 9-year-old sister, and asked her what happened to her little brother. She told them, "oh - my older brother hit him in the head with a baseball bat."

But she went on to provide context: "he was hitting pop flies to me to catch to practice for softball season, and our little brother ran behind him while he was on a backswing, and got knocked down."

Neither brother lied about what happened.

Indeed, they both "told the truth".

But neither told enough of the story to prevent/correct some likely misconceptions about what had happened. Had they been asked, "why did you brother hit you"/"why did you hit your brother", either would have filled-in the 10 seconds of backstory necessary to change the impression of the adults asking from horror over abuse to sympathy for an accident, and relief it was not more serious than "just" a black eye.

As data and information moves in ever-larger volumes ever-faster around the world, curating it into something that is both understandable and which contains enough context to be able to come to a proper conclusion about what you're seeing/hearing is becoming possibly the biggest issue facing society as a whole.

10 seconds of video probably doesn't have enough context to be fully understood - especially when it could be cut together, deep-faked, dubbed, etc

Solve the problem of ensuring information is reliable, accurate, and contains enough context to be understood properly, and you'll have solved social media
Since it is the government, anything at that level would still be at the whims of, the government. Such that I don't really see your point? Are you wanting it to be argued that they'd have to pass a resolution to change whether or not they can use the funds? Isn't that basically what already happened?

You could argue that it could have been done in a different way, but the odds are silly high that that wouldn't have changed anything. Budgetary spend and allocation is controlled by congress, such that it would have only changed the nature of the resolution.

More, you would just be changing the nature of the "fiction." Akin to saying the federal reserve is separate from the government. I mean, yeah, but it is also established by the government. And I expect that winds of the controlling party would blow it about as well as it does the EPA and such.
The model, source, etc. are available under permissive terms

https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/stablecode-instruct-alpha...

You can “run it locally”. Very handy if you do not trust automatically sending all your code to someone in the United States.
Would your current 20$ still be a meaningful value in 2380?
It means you ought to check the aforementioned monty python bit.
Online attackers break into UK Electoral Commission systems
I mean if Hunter S. Thompson was still alive he'd be on the breadline.
I'm honestly surprised you didn't know about it.
It outputs the string 
 a couple times, which causes it to forget what it was talking about before. Looks almost like crossed wires with sessions and a load balancer?

Strong Dr. Bronner's soap label vibes!
Great question! Our users see a 6 point improvement in ISI (insomnia severity index) on average in the first 7 days, which represent a categorical improvement in insomnia severity e.g. from severe (clinical) insomnia to moderate (clinical) insomnia, or moderate (clinical) insomnia to mild insomnia. ISI continues to improve during the program, and the benefits are sustained after that.

Another important consideration is patient adherence (i.e. how likely someone is going to stay for the program), which is something that many digital health apps (and even in-person therapy) struggle with. A lot of this is influenced by personal preference too (do you prefer reading, or watching a video, or listening to an audio to consume content etc). So you can tell from the first 7 days if our approach resonates with you.

We also have a 30-day moneyback guarantee, so if the program doesn't work for you, we'll be happy to issue a refund.
Well, if there are hundreds of companies doing deliveries for Amazon, then isn't "doing deliveries for Amazon" it's own industry? If hundreds of companies don't form an "industry", then I don't know what does.

In the industry of "companies doing delivery for Amazon", Amazon has a dominant position. They can destroy any one company, or destroy the entire industry on a whim.
Hey! Thanks for the feedback. I'd just be worried people might not be using the correct libraries since I think they still provide different functionality.

So exporting one Database that allows people to pick which driver they want to use might be a simple and user-friendly solution (incl. better-sqlite3) which people have asked for.
This is 68 miles of tunnel. This is an enormous length of tunnel, its scope is anything but small.

I'm not sure what you mean by service requirements for a tunnel, but I assume you mean maintenance. Maintenance requirements for tunnels are only tangentially related to diameter once the final lining is in place, it is mostly driven by length. Realistically there is only so much maintenance that can happen for a tunnel or for any underground structure from the structural perspective since you can't look outside of the tunnel from the inside. So you overdesign. Maintenance requirements thus amount to visual inspections of the inside and maintenance of appurtenant mechanical/electrical systems. These mechanical/electrical systems become more reliable and more efficient with relation to tunnel diameter, and so your maintenance requirements actually decrease on an aggregate basis (i.e. - a tunnel that can support 2 lanes of traffic is less costly to maintain than 2 tunnels that support 1 lane of traffic).

And the idea that anything ran by Elon Musk is not susceptible to whims and scope changes is laughable.
The best part is when the frontend input and backend validation get out of sync, so your password works sometimes depending on where you come in from.
I used to have ocean front property.
odds of this getting shutdown in the next 3 years?
This project would benefit greatly from some screenshots or videos on any of the pages linked in the header. Also maybe it makes more sense on mobile but the hardware screen is painful to read on desktop.

It's not at all clear to me what this brings to the table over the default Steam Deck software (I know that's only 1 of many devices it supports). I'm pretty freaking happy with the default OS plus EmuDeck on my Steam Deck. I know there are launchers for Epic/Blizzard/GoG which I'll probably setup eventually but so far I haven't needed or cared about anything from those sources.

I assume this is really for Steam Deck clones or desktop computers.

Here is a video of the UI I found (not endorsing anything, just the first video I found that showed the UI): https://youtu.be/E2NIGPpz_vY?t=19 - It looks very similar to the Steam Deck UI which I find very nice to use.
This is always the first good question to ask about any chat bot IMO
Or Chrome/Edge/Whatever and metamask ahah
> So no one should make art, since it's exploited.

That's a bit extreme. Nobody should agree to abusive working conditions - there is a difference.

And no, unions did not grant us minimum wage or weekends. There was a strong labor movement happening regardless of unions at the time.

Minimum wage - you probably don't want to use that as some sort of argument crutch anyway, because it's original intended purpose will not support your position.

People who support unions seem to believe unions are the only way to gain better employment opportunities or fix conditions they believe are wrong. Which is where the pro-union people lose the general population...

Unions have been mal-actors for decades. People see what they do... including doom an entire generation of children recently. People have largely rejected unions in modern times - for very good reasons.

Today's unions exist to serve the union. It's pretty sick how they turned out... but what do you expect from any sufficiently large and long-lived bureaucracy.
It's not "unlikely"; it's something that happened.

And, again, if something that was configured wrong this goes back to how managing Python is a pain in the ass. I should be able to dedicate my brain power to the problems I need to solve, not what things need to be in my venv and what things need to be outside of it.
My good friend from high school has a PhD and was a published expert in a field that stopped being relevant when his company acquired another company and went with their tech.

He was laid off and unemployable in the field. He survived as a Starbucks manager and sold Herbalife for a year while getting some additional education. I was able to help him get a contract as a tech writer to get out of the retail stuff. Now he’s a director level person in a cybersecurity firm.

The one true path is obvious on message boards, but the reality is people find themselves in bad places sometimes.
>how does WEI make it _impossible_ for attesters to return higher entropy information?

It isn't impossible, but doing so would violate users privacy which isn't the goal of the proposal. You don't need WEI to violate people's privacy.

>False, this is an explicit design goal: "Allow web servers to evaluate the authenticity of the device and honest representation of the software stack and the traffic from the device."

That statement means that the site would learn that for example the server can trust that the user is using Chrome on windows. A feature of Chrome is that it's possible to spoof your user agent.

>Seeing a message that says "Sorry, this website is only accessible by browsers that support WEI" is very intrusive.

This can apply to anyone API. It's happened for WebGPU. It's blocking users is not a goal of the API.

>no website is going to trust your attestation service. This is equivalent to saying "Just create your own CA".

It is possible to create your own CA. How do you think things like Lets Encrypt came into existence. Trust is hard to earn. That doesn't mean that it is impossible to get people to trust you.

>No, the physical analog is "lying", which isn't illegal in most situations

I agree, but WEI is meant to be used in situations where lying should be illegal.
> He quoted you:

> >it does seem to indicate that IPv6 is mostly pointless for human users for exactly this reason

Huh? There is no quote in that comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37051011.

Unless you are referring to a different comment?
Thanks. I did some googling to try to better understand what the "meat" of a job like that would be and came up pretty empty, so it must be very niche. I'm guessing it's doing contracts for service providers, e.g. in California a customer would be Pacific Gas and Electric Company, eh?
That's art, baby!

Feels like Stand on Zanzibar by John Brunner; a very prophetic book I wholeheartedly recommend.
replit’s model is surprisingly good at generating code, even at following complex instructions that I was sure would confuse it. I have found it’s a bit weak on code analysis, for open-ended questions like ‘is there a bug anywhere in this code?’ that GPT-4 can answer.
What did you learn by taking the easy route with Docker Swarm in your home lab? What did you set out to do with Kubernetes to begin with?
I read swarm doesn't have autoscaling but that was a while ago. Did that change?
I don't think there are many people who fly enough that it's economical for them to buy an A220 in order to save $1.73/gal on jet fuel. (That's the actual proposed change in taxes.)
Anyone else find it odd that the author's company-internal work intranet, which requires a VPN to access, is deployed behind a Cloudflare CDN? Why would anyone do this?
The last time someone made this claim on HN, someone from NordVPN responded saying it is false.
U2F is starting to take off, thankfully. I'm worried about what happens if it gets lost/stolen/mugged and the token is gone, but at least no SS7 attack.
That is exactly what's happened on DeBank, it is even encouraged with special accounts. People are still eating it up though... usage has soared since they added the Lucky Draw aspect. Tons of fun sybil games being played that are eating into them in ways they never imagined.

https://debank.com/official-ranking

https://docs.cloud.debank.com/en/official-account/introducti...
As I mentioned, the aircraft is certified to land safely with just the brakes.

The cert test that results in flames is a worst case scenario - in particular, with flaps retracted, the airplane lands at a much higher speed than normal.

And, of course, when you're taxiing around, you'll just use the brakes.
This is super interesting. If you actually look at a Loadbalancer logs without a WAF in place, you will see huge amount of bot activity.

What is not clear in the blogs is how did they actually accessed the API server without a valid service token. Secondly, they index alot on IPs, that implied these are k8s cluster that are not managed (EKS, GKE etc).

Is my assumption correct?
It's astonishing how many places the 8051 shows up. Got an in-car Tire Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS)? It's almost certainly an 8051. Getting accurate shipment numbers (without paying for the reports) is hard, but there's clearly still billions of 8051 variants shipping every year.
Interesting to me - the NYC area (I’m from Connecticut nearby) seems like it’s been on solid ground for most of the timescale represented. And Florida didn’t exist 20mm years ago.
As much as that may be true, I'd much prefer for this kind of reporting to include a real-world reproduction instead of the sensationalist 93% reporting.
And soon you'll have it again.
You will see the posts of the people you follow: so even if their is spammers/scammer, you won't see what they post if you don't follow theim

Regarding the fees, it would be the chain fees, for example on polygon it's like 0.00001$
>There are an infinite number of models which generate the same exact (infinite) sequence.

Only if there is no constraint on the model. But the fixed number of parameters, and the inductive bias of attention limits the space of models that are learnable. In the limit of infinite data but finite capacity for memorization, the only available solution will be to recover the information dynamic of the generating process.

>So of the infinite models of all of history, we're not even interested in the ones which are maximally retrospectively predictive.

Presumably the same processes that operated in the past will operate in the future. So accurately modelling the past is certainly very informative for the future.
I write rust professionally and I really, really enjoy it. It’s lots of fun, and has found a good (and novel!) point in the space of safety vs. speed. That said, I think in the 80-90% case, a language with a garbage collector is probably more appropriate for the task at hand.
That's crazy! I mean, how many interviews did you have?!

But you know, if you have enough money to live for that time, I think it's totally fine.

Yet, impressive
The Intel GPU drivers have been open source for years.
>of course not. But exceeding what humans can do in terms of reasoning is not an unreasonable bar for reasoning.

It isn't, because you presuppose it reasons
I ran it locally and it seemed to do better. I switched Python to Bash and it also gave a good answer (nproc).