skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah... I don't know if you saw Rodrigo Branco's damning "The Microarchitectures That I Saw And The Ones That I Hope To One Day See":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlcQrx7VK00
https://hardwear.io/usa-2023/presentation/the-microarchitect...

But it definitely seems to be a culture/disclosure problem.

(Also, hi - hope things are going well! We miss you on Mastodon)
It currently generates hydropower, so I suppose so.
Beautiful write up and project!

I remember reading about another Casio retrofit:

https://github.com/carrotIndustries/pluto

That version did not have wireless comms - they touch on that in the faq.
Apple Developer Documentation Archives
The NES incorporated a chipset that buried an entire 6502 inside. You can get a Rockchip ARM chip for the price of a pizza that incorporates mixed cores on the die. Maybe the chipmakers don't NEED to solve every edge case until the end of time, but delegate side channel attack mitigations like this back to the chipgobblers (us).

Hear me out: Instead of making SMT an all-or-nothing pre oposition, we have "lousy cores" where untrusted code goes and make the customer "prove" it should get elevation to the cores with SMT?

I dont't want to clobber my chip that's running the mega-important payroll jobs where no one can load anything else on to the board under pain of death. However I would like to be forced into tagging what is safe to run SMT else I get stuck on the safer cores.

I might be an intern who has no idea what any of this stuff means and goes to Google it, then learn what this attack vector truly is. Then makes a plan on how to defend against it.

Am I crazy?
with hot swap keyboard, silent switches on vowels, R, T, most common letters and clacky switches elsewhere could (plausibly) defeat this profiling (or white noise generator)
I’ve seen inside of privately funded research that doesn’t have publication requirements and sometimes it is driven by a combination of belief, passion and incompetence which leads to an avoidance of accepting failure. Not saying this is the case with this but please do not elevate private research above public research. There is actually less controls over the quality of private research.
OK, but not with a balaclava.
My self discipline hack was only navigating to my subscription feed, that way it "ends" and there is only a handful of videos to check each day.

But now they put Shorts into the subscription feed, a gateway into another endless feed. So I have blocked YT altogether until I can update my little chrome extension to remove them. When my executive function started to falter shorts could vacuum up so much of my attention. You can't remove them from that page either like you can on the homepage, and on the homepage you can only hide them for 30 days (why is that I wonder...)
What’s wrong with it? Not enough json kubernetes mongo rust npm AI cloud react? Or is “old” just the same as “bad”?

Sadly “move on” today means moving to a single vendor’s walled garden. We don’t really have truly federated protocols anymore. We do have some contenders but none that my mother and barber and government use.
Have you visited many stores since 2020? There was an event around that time.

I still today wear a mask in every store I enter and I can completely honestly say that I have never gotten a weird look from staff over it; it's never been a problem.
Are you sure it wasn't the Meta Object Protocol (MOP) rather than Moose? "A MOP for Perl" inspired endless debate but never amounted to much. In the end I think the Perl 5 community felt it was best left to Perl 6 but I could be wrong as this was all about 20 years ago.
https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/U+1D54F

It's in with the 150,000 characters included in Unicode. Unicode includes like 150 languages going all the way back to cuneiform.
It seems the client/server is neccesary. Not an issue for cloud projects composed of many servers and SDKs like Deis Labs or Fermyon, but an issue for others wanting to adopt it.
Agree with this statement wholeheartedly. Antidepressants can help many feel better and help get things moving and enable the person to make even more life changes to get even better.

#personalexperience
Hmm, IANAL, though I seem to believe there tends to be a question of "have you seen the original code before writing your clone" - which presumes that you still risk copying some code - or are you doing a "cleanroom reimplementation" without ever at all seeing the original code, just basing purely on a specification of the original, ideally written by someone else. As long as it's not pristine cleanroom, I think it's potentially murky territory.
? I didn't say it's a security flaw. The problem is that it's a terrible, user-hostile, open-web-hostile approach to security that shouldn't have even been proposed.

>there's no reason to think that carriers would even want any sort of device attestation

With the bargaining power that Google has in the mobile space, I strongly suspect they could find a way to entice carriers into moving towards enforcing device attestation. And I don't just mean forcing devices to attest; I mean things like, Hmmm, are you sure you want these untrusted Android devices on your RCS services?

> or be legally allowed to do that under the terms of their spectrum licenses.

I don't really like relying on hoping the laws will help, but it would be nice to know for sure if they do. Unfortunately, I am assuming you aren't actually positive.

Google Fi definitely favors Google devices heavily and there is no supported way to use a non-data-only device without an Android phone with GMS.
The ublock cookie ones will decline if it’s possible I believe. IANAL but I doubt that most of the things that pop up websites, get you to agree to would really hold up in court unless they had evidence that you specifically agreed to something. From what I’ve seen most of them are like it or lump it where if you don’t agree, they exit you from the website anyway.
People immediately assume if you dislike CF you’re defending one site in particular and once they do that no further discussion is possible.
> they do or they dont

Only a Sith...

Seriously, the idea that "reasoning" could be a binary property seems very disconnected from the reality of the situation.

> reasoning in which contradictions are impermissible

Every human on the planet would fail that test, including you.

"Fooling apes" is much easier when the ape you need to fool is yourself.
FWIW the handful of times I've dealt with WF customer service they've been helpful and friendly solving my problems easily.

My credit union on the other hand could not understand why I wouldn't give them my card number over the phone whenthey called me.
it would be hard to predict the water levels from climate change vs just where land will be based on plate tectonics. they could move the land masses around, and then maybe allow adjustments to say if there's no more polar ice, current levels, etc. but then i'm sure there would be mass hysteria from the climate deniers. neat idea though.
I thought they wanted to drive trucks for Tay Tay!
Man, I wrote several replies to this comment but decided against them all. This is silly- the U.S. and China have been playing with balloons like this for years, that one was just really big
It just takes an incredible level of self-awareness and vulnerability.

Everyone thinks that the way to convince people to trust them or acknowledge them is to be know-it-all, but the truth is just being authentic and help will come.
Continuing to move goal posts rather than conceding and completely ignoring the links provided which refute your argument are indications this is not a productive discussion and suggest you're arguing in bad faith.

Instead of replying to points, you're trying to distract from the lack of argument by referring to the rules. You can do both, but choose not to.
While that's true, there are also projects that can live and die with very few code changes for years. And as long as those projects are continuing to provide value for their lifetime, I'd call that a successful project.

On the other hand, I've seen projects get to 99% and they provide value for a few months and then because they never get to 100%, every time there's an issue no matter how small, it's very difficult to debug and the original owner has moved on to a new project or left the company so users are left holding the bag or they just end up deciding to stop using the product or build a new one.
Even companies that are actively hiring seem to be in no rush to fill positions and are being extremely selective. Probably due to financial/macro econ concerns more than anything else, but still no less frustrating. It will take months, not weeks to find a fit anywhere at the moment.
There is no reason to distinguish a Handler from a Logger. A Handler is just a Logger which has a side effect, nothing more.

There is no reason to distinguish an Attr or Group or Record from a (set of) KeyValuePairs. They're all the same thing.

And I don't agree that Zap is the most popular structured logging library. It's one of many, none are the clear winner.

But, whatever.
There must already be some light bending happening in space. Question is would it be enough to look at our planet from our planet?
And can we even do the maths to know when and where to look at?
Which points to a firmware bug in the SSD that the use-case managed to trigger repeatedly. Firmware bugs were around in abundance when performant SSDs first came to market more than a decade ago, and while manufacturers have gotten better at testing SSD firmware, it is still inevitable that bugs will occasionally make it into shipping hardware. Moral of the story: don't trust your valued data to any one storage device. I've tried to use drives from different vendors in RAID 1 mirrors to minimize exposure to firmware bugs, and I've still seen SSDs die at unexpected times in the last few years.
I didn’t take it that way. I think Panama owes its existence, the canal, and its democracy to the United States. Also the close ties have been a huge cultural and economic boon.

Panama has developed nicely since Noriega was deposed.
Gemini also doesn't really offer anything significantly better over gopher, imho, and only adds things that make it, ironically, less useable.
I was in the market for a new GPU and I debated between a 4090 and a 4070. 4070 is fine for the type of work and gaming I do, but I was thinking about the additional RAM. Then I realized that the 4070 has more vram than most consumers do, so many models will be optimized for that, and at some point someone will come out with a high-ram neural network only card at some point, and that would end up being better than the 4090 anyway because 24 gigs of vram is still quite small. I don’t know a ton about this stuff so who knows if that was the right decision… but I’m thinking along the same lines as you.
I've a bangle js. I find it the perfect watch for hacking. It's similar to the pebble watch. https://www.espruino.com/Bangle.js2

Apps are written for it using espruino javascript. I get over a week battery life of of it.

https://banglejs.com/apps
That seems disingenuous at best.

Your ancestoral comment wasn't framed as "here's an example of potential bias that smart people would know how to work through".

It clearly suggested that official global mean tempretures would rise as a result of uncorrected urban heat bias.

Did you actually believe that something that obvious had not been accounted for?

If you didn't think that, then why suggest that it wasn't?
Unreal is used by all the major VFX vendors whether it be for virtual production, previz or final frame rendering.
Cheap Google pixel phone from swappa.com
This is one of those cycles that IT does regularly every other decade.

In the early days, computers were huge things that were maintained by a team of specialists (and who actually soldered things together). Getting anything changed involved a series of paper forms and waiting for a specialist to do it for you.

Then came the microcomputer revolution and computers became small things that sat on desks and were maintained by the office geek. Changing anything meant talking to him (it was always him) and it would be done by lunchtime, and you owed him a coffee.

Then companies learned that this meant that no two offices had the same configuration, application suite, or even operating system. IT was centralised, and every office issued with the same stuff. Getting anything changed meant filling in forms and waiting for System Administrators to get around to it.

Then Agile and the Cloud happened and while the rest of the company had to carry on filling in forms, the IT Department turned into Engineering and DevOps was born. Every developer learned how to deploy their stuff to the cloud by themselves.

Then organisations worked out that that meant that applications were deployed badly, using a wide variety of tools and technologies, and essential security practices got skipped because no-one was responsible for them. So DevOps was turned back into SysAdmin and the forms reinvented as JIRA tickets.

And so we go on. There are micro-cycles within these ones, like the one about terminals (are you typing on the actual computer, or on a terminal that talks to the actual computer which is somewhere else? The answer depends on which decade you're in).

The ideal solution is somewhere in between (enough central control for it not to get into a mess, but enough decentralisation to prevent bureaucracy and allow for agility in the actual business). But that is a very hard balance to find and keep.
I guess the answer is “it depends”. Operators are great when done in good taste and can be a complete nightmare if used too much or in bad taste.
We are having regular threads on HN about how the FDA is not approving drugs fast enough and someone in our community is dying and cannot access the experimental drug that may have saved them.

Example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36827438
Not a perfect solution but with webrings you could dissuade user tracking while promoting certain style guidelines. Sort of like a Home Ownership Association sans all the bullshit.
Put briefly, yes. And I do think WEI is unanimously bad. I am alarmed that anyone thinks this is a reasonable idea.
Not as difficult as you may imagine:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Camping

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Disappointment
I heard as well that they moved away to custom software.
The PDF reader is also the reason I use it. Switch it to cover mode and span the pages. It's better than Chrome's reader, IMO.
@cbkeller: Though MPI is dominant in HPC by a very large margin, it's definitely not the only game in town. SHMEM is an MPI alternative with a smaller but very dedicated following. UPC, Fortran 2008, UPC++, and Chapel are all alternatives that support inter-node communication without relying on MPI or explicit library communication calls. Chapel has the additional advantage of not imposing the SPMD programming model on the user and supporting asynchronous dynamic tasking.

It's my understanding that Julia aspires to join this group of languages if it is able to do so, which is why the Petaflops announcement was originally enticing to me, and then became somewhat less so once I learned that it was relying on MPI.
Eastern Europeans have had it right for over a century, all news is inherently bullshit. Yes, all of it. No exceptions.
Occasionally it won't sync a workout when I ask it to. There was a confusion of which app to use and which accounts you need to sign up for (Zepp versus whatever the other thing), and it seemed to ask for a bunch of info. Up until the 7 you couldn't turn it off. Mostly it just feels clunky. It does the job but it's not what I'd call delightful to use.
I believe you are remembering [1] and it is not a full levitation.

1.
https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1687405505604734978
The whole record keeping requirement for written correspondence generally seems completely unreasonable. Presumably telephone calls, zoom calls and in person meetings aren't recorded?

Why should that be different if it's written?
Ah funnily enough I did use that a fair amount in my C#/WPF days. Rx does indeed seem like a good fit.
There's adjacent work for any utility, but the type I was doing was cable/fiber.

The crux of the concept is receiving a map, sometimes partially completed, sometimes with partially incorrect information, and using easily placed symbols to make corrections for submission.

Whatever % of that you feel comfortable doing in the field, you do, with the remainder being finished wherever (often in front of a TV show, from what I saw).

A slightly more complicated (and nonpublic) version of contributing to OpenStreetMaps.
Look at India go! Travels fast and smashes into Asia
The problem isn't that the hack only works in Chrome, it's that the system being proposed is inherently terrible regardless of how it's implemented.

There is no such thing as a reliable standard for browsers to verify that users are human that does not harm the open web or threaten user autonomy and accessibility. Every single accessibility standard and user choice about extensions and access is abusable by malicious actors, and every security measure to block abuse of automated scraping or access also blocks valid use cases.

Making it a web standard won't change that fact.
I agree with you and the developments you mention are serious problems.

But all those developments were catalyzed by political and economic policies put in place or actively enabled by politicians who were enthusiastically elected and re-elected over and over again by the very people those policies hurt the most. And the response of those hurt is to elect even worse politicians who enact even more damaging policies.

This is no secret and has been actively discussed and lamented among liberal elites for decades.

It was a high-ranking member of the elite who said "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result." The chief difference between the classes may be that one understands this and the other refuses to contemplate it.

At the end of the day, if people continue to insist that you take their money and use it to hurt them, it just seems impolite not to.
Automatically Correcting LLMs: Surveying diverse self-correction strategies
I did not say I consider private research in some sort of higher level than public research. I only said they have no incentive to do full disclosure right now. Without knowing exactly what they know, it is insulting to authors to describe, or even hint, them as avoiding to accept failture. It is simply unwarranted ad-hominem and not contributing anything to academic discussion at this point.
There really isn’t anything that constitutionally prevents the federal government from establishing universal healthcare. See Medicare and Medicaid.
NixOS and Guix are capable of that; Fedora Silverblue and Fedora Kinoite (the same technology, just with different default desktop environments) also similar conceptually, but are a little less flexible to manage than through their management CLIs than those of Nix and Guix. I think all of them would recover to a consistent and fully-functional state, but Silverblue/Kinoite would not necessarily remove the 'ghost' packages automatically.
That's, of course, not the point. For example, I believe the Chromium team has done plenty of good, too, but the C-suite, directors and shareholders are at best, completely complicit in a lot of the sketchy, corrupt activity that Google is endeavoring in with standards, Android, etc.

So it's difficult to trust them with anything. There are plenty of great people at Google, but they're not able to stop the awful things Google does, so why does it matter?
> Presumably telephone calls, zoom calls and in person meetings aren't recorded?

Of course they are.

No offense: Where have you been?
Not retaining written comms is evading regulations - "retain written comms" is one, and using Signal/WhatsApp is evading it.

Nobody working in banking is unaware of the written comms rules. Nobody using Signal or WhatsApp in that context is unaware they can't retain written comms. Can you prove intent? Probably not. Is it clear as daylight why this happened? Uh, yes.

And so the SEC hits them where it hurts at least a little bit, in the wallet.

Also, if you pay attention to the banking space... this is pretty much the usual cast of characters. There's absolutely no surprise.
But at least now we know who's making the bespoke tableware for the conference!
So in recent months, an update to Chrome caused it to hide the top bar (avatar, tabs button, and hamburger) when I'm on the home screen ("Discover", "Following") and I've scrolled downwards.

So when I'm done or I reach the bottom, rather than scroll manually to the top, I tap the URL bar and enter a very specific search term. So Google should know, every time I enter this search term, it's me doing a workaround to close the tab as efficiently as possible.
Some large tech companies dedicate multiple teams to package management and installation. It's a unique enough problem that you may not want developers to focus on it, better to roll it up to a dedicated team. They usually work closely with release operations.
Four levels of government and an ISP having an easily searched and/or subpoenae'd copy of the message...?

What forum is this?
Good call.

Software is a living organism, or it is dying. Just as a practical observed matter of how it actually works out.

There are a few exceptions, but few indeed.
Clearly a Go enthusiast who never mastered Python. And, really, Go? If your were pushing Rust mayyyybe I could give you the benefit of the doubt.
You're missing the point: Natural language can be much a higher layer of abstraction than the programming languages we currently have. It's much faster to say "Add a button to download the output as a PDF" than write JS directly.

You'd be surprised by what regular people can build when you give them the power to create software. Here are a bunch of apps created using my tool/GPT-4: https://showcase.picoapps.xyz Most of our users have never coded before, and are able to build small tools to make their and their customers' lives better.
timestamp, for the impatient: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBvclVcesEE&t=353s
> Way too many bosses are sure that remote work hurts worker productivity

Recycling a comment [0] from last week, an act which I suppose endorses that "the debate is old":

_______________

[Productivity loss claims are] somewhat misleading, the "productivity" does NOT mean physics-style efficiency of human effort to create value and fight entropy... No, it's based on what employers had to spend. So slaves that only produce a quarter as much per day are technically "more productive."

This matters because employers that require unnecessary time/fuel for commutes typically don't pay for it. Out of tradition and negotiating-power, those costs are usually shoved off onto employees and are not being tracked.

If commuting to the office was compensated, [any negative] "productivity" differences with work-from-home would be dramatically flipped.

_______________

[0] Prior context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36974915
Yes, due to the emergence of better bots, traditional CAPTCHAs aren't very good at being CAPTCHAs anymore either. It's a hard problem to solve, and it's a moving target.
Wait until you touch a live anode, that will send shivers down your spine ;)
Those don't sound like 1%. They sound like a lot more than that. Which is why they don't get done. Who has the time?
Alternate title: D1 receptors make for better targets than D2 receptors.
What time of day do you receive the module, and is that based upon your timezone?

What time of day are you recommended to use the module?
To be fair, the content creators are building the castles, consumers just visit. If my favourite creators all build new castles somewhere else one day, I'd go there.
Breakout.pdf [pdf]