skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can already foresee the immense amount of fun the kids will have trying to get past the guardrails.
Rate limits can also be based on the message contents, e. g. max 20 lookups per day for a cell.
Sully's 'Miracle on the Hudson' is (largely?) attributed to his skill as a glider pilot.[0]

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549
The Quantum update was an update to the Desktop version of Firefox that happened in 2017. Mozilla did not remove access to any mobile add-ons at that time.

You probably mean the Firefox Daylight release that happened in August 2020. Firefox Daylight or Fenix was a completely new browser, not an update. That completely new browser did not fully support add-ons at the time it was released, which is why Mozilla introduced the restricted list of "supported" add-ons. I'm not quite sure how this is ironic. You seem to think that Mozilla somehow did this to get one over on their users, but I can assure you that this isn't the case.
It's a freedom that does not affect 99% of users.

It does affect the the richest, most abusive corporations though.
Wait few months and you will have youtube “studio premium” feature so you can edit these videos there, mockery.
> Avoid social media until at least age 16

I see the benefits of this in theory but in practice I worry that it will just cause more IRL bullying and isolation.
younger me was never denied videogames/consoles/pc games.

I'm now an engineer with a bunch of friends and socially well adjusted. But then each child is unique and each situation is unique, most kids in my neighborhood weren't allowed outside after dark, in winter it was basically dark when we got home from school also i was an only child so didn't have any siblings to keep me entertained, that leaves a lot of time for Homework, TV, Video Games, Reading etc.

Also it rained a lot so you were stuck inside a lot. In fact when the weather was good you were desperate to get out of the house because you'd be stuck inside so often.

If i were parenting today i might have to follow a different approach to my parents but only because i might want to curate the games my kids would play personally i actually think the right video game is just as if not more valuable than books. Learning mechanics, developing strategies, reacting to changing and unfavorable circumstances, teamwork. are great life skills. I do think i learned a fair bit playing Starcraft and Counter Strike.
Hume's starting premise is that we can only talk about ideas in our heads. Hume was wrong; outrageously so.

> that even causality cannot be meaningfully verified as real

So much for how awfully limited Hume's philosophy is. If your premises are insufficient to evidence ordinary propositions; so much for your premises. The toy model here is the deficiency, not the world.

> then you have to at least outline what you mean by "a flower"

I do not. Philosophy answers to reality, not the converse. When I pick up a flower, there is a flower. Our ability to put that into words may, or may not, be limited. The power of our philosophical cognition here is irrelevant.

That I am holding a flower invalidates all systems of philosophical propositions which assign that proposition 'False'. Scepticism does not falsify reality, rather, it is the converse.

That there are systems of propositions which succeed in accounting for the truth of ordinary such claims makes scepticism doubly absurd.

There is a world. It is the cause of my perceptions. My perceptions are caused by the world they present. I learn to perceive the structure of the world because the world has that structure. And so on.
I have a feeling Google/Alphabet/YouTube aren't investing a lot of money into this, because they know their opponents have almost infinite resource, of free time and dedication.

Besides how would you like to work in the YouTube "DRM" team, where every few weeks you'd show up to work and the news is "well, they cracked it again, your last few months' of work is useless.".
I'm amazed that the autopilot kicked off just because the pitot tubes froze. The A330 has an inertial reference unit as well as (almost certainly) GPS, both of which could have provided ground speed. Air speed could be extrapolated from previous air speed and inferred from ground speed, engine thrust, and known weather. IRU and GPS could also have provided altitude and thus climb rate. And we know the plane had a barometer, although it had to be corrected for airspeed according to TFA. I'm guessing the plane also had a radar altimeter, but maybe not.

With all these sources of information, the autopilot could have said "Hey the pitot tubes are giving me weird data, but no worries. Still flying the plane. Carry on."

Why didn't that happen?
The author makes the very strange mistake of confusing a person's mealtime banter with the supposed overconfidence of their legal reasoning. I find this a low-quality gotcha, or possibly an extreme lack of social graces such that the author cannot understand the sensitivity to context that the judge has, which the author does not possess.

> To return to my lunchtime debate with Justice Scalia: Biologically speaking, the case is airtight. “Meat” refers to the flesh of an animal. Fish are animals. So when we eat their flesh, we are, by definition, eating meat.

That's Airtight? Is blood sausage with a vegetable casing meat? After all we make a distinction between flesh and blood. Or is it any animal product? Is then cheese made with animal rennet a meat? Is yeast a meat? Was it a meat before we understood biological taxa better, but no longer?
> “[T]he average user must recognize that YouTube content, unlike media content on other websites, cannot be downloaded with a simple right-click and must be aware that this is achieved using technology on YouTube and that youtube-dl ‘overrides’ this protection. It is therefore to be assumed that the average user acts in bad faith,” the Hamburg Court wrote.

I don't think this is a good ruling.
Crowdfind.ai – Find like minded people to build projects together
A lot of ideas and projects dying just because they don't have people with expertise like tech founders. And a lot of people looking for such projects. So we decided to build CrowdFind.AI to connect like-minded people to build projects together.
Tesla won the plug war – and that's good news [video]
I'm a resident of Germany and I visited the US this year. I'm quite conscious of my 5 year old's sugar intake so I almost obsessively look at the labels looking for the percentage of sugar a product contains at grocery stores.

Reading the labels in the US was __extremely aggravating__ due to the serving size bullshit and it gave me a headache after calculating the percentage of sugar in the products after like the 10th product. Here in Germany, the label states the number of grams of sugar for every 100 grams of product, so you don't even have to calculate the percentage. Comparing products in the grocery store aisles is really easy in Germany.
That's true. I think the worst thing about git CLI is it hides the state and forces you to issue another command to query the state, but you could easily forget. A lot of people add the thing to the PS1 to show some state, but it's not default.

However, I'm still not sure git will actually fuck things up with a pull. I think that's the users later when they go nuclear and delete the repo.
> We have to reform agriculture to stop and reverse biodiversity loss.

Sure! Do you have a proposal to make agriculture more eco-friendly without impacting quantity, quality and cost of the food produced?

> The key is reducing meat consumption

No! If you really want to achieve something, rather than just talking ecology, the key is not to try and force change on the general population.
It's probably a complicated story. At least suburban kids play soccer rather than baseball/softball (or even American football) growing up these days. I imagine basketball is still pretty popular especially in cities. F1 vs. NASCAR? Don't really know the numbers--obviously that's a sport that most viewers never participated in.

Although I played it in college, rugby has always been at least something out of the mainstream in most places.
As far as I know, they already do this (legally). They seem to be "just" standardizing for interoperability.
I have two kids, 5 and 8. In brief, I love computers and the internet but I genuinely fear social media and the whole dopamine loop hole along with various other social media risks. So my over-arching strategy has been to emphasise creativity vs consumption. Like, some passive consumption is fine, but I encourage them to think about what they are actually doing. If my child says "can I go on my laptop?", my first question is "what are you planning to do?". Youtube is awful for them. Email with family, seeing how easy it is to make and host a website, Google Maps, BBC in general ... these have been positive things,
I mean I always though of AGPL as network-aware GPL so that makes sense to me. IANAL
I'm assuming you're missing some words here, probably "with Stripe"

The idea that every credit card transaction or any form of dollar based transaction works on software directly built on Consul is patently false.
The cryptography is well-known - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_sharing - and very flexible (you give each person one or more share and set a threshold for how many shares are required to recover the secret). Unfortunately I don't have a nice user-friendly piece of software to point you to.
I mean couldn't a registry also shaft you?
Israeli startups are moving jobs and money out of the country
git bisect --first-parent

Solves that issue entirely. Let branches hold their history, let the release/main branch hold the history of stable builds.
I love Pulumi, but I can't in good conscience hand it to a group of developers when I know at least one of them will want to be extremely clever and abuse the fact that it runs real code to do cursed things that will make the code not just not idempotent (i.e. picking the most recent secret from somewhere, or a new AMI), but anti-idempotent (it doesn't run the second time around, it does things to the filesystem, it provisions things outside of the pulumi ecosystem).

Much easier to hand them Terraform and reject anything with local-exec provisioner, the official worst piece of terraform.
My wife and I just had our first child a little over two months ago. Our implementation is unsettled, but my wife and I are of similar mind.

We were both raised with basically zero restrictions on computer usage. I had a computer in my bedroom from the time I was ten when the 386 supplanted the 286 in the den. Every time the family would get a new computer, the old one would move into my room. That however came with very little of the dangers of today. Social media was not a thing. and the trouble you could get into on sub-56k internet were pretty limited by comparison.

Neither of us want to do straight up arbitrary "screen time" restrictions. They strike me as the worst kind of rule - arbitrary. Creative endeavors, reading, learning and growing shouldn't come with restrictions. I wouldn't be the person I am today in the job I have today if I hadn't been able to spend endless hours trying to make my monochrome 286 do neat things.

And yet… On the other hand I don't think there's a lot of value in endless short form videos or scrolling social media.

For years I have seen my nieces and nephews with unrestricted personal tablet use spend entire holidays watching YouTube sitting in the corner at their grandparents house and it frankly bothers me. My in-laws will often let their very young children use their phone "as a treat". One of my "favorite" stories to tell is my at the time three year old niece stealing her moms phone from her purse to watch YouTube videos. On her mom confiscating the phone and telling her "You have to ask to use mommy's phone" she had a meltdown screaming "I don't ask. I don't ask." over and over for a solid five minutes.

I suspect prior to a certain age, keeping them from electronics particularly without active guidance is probably for the best. I also suspect whatever I try to do will likely fall apart when their friends will have limitless access. I have genuinely considered homeschooling over this but my wife doesn't like that option.

Recently, prior to the birth of our daughter, we babysat my friends son. My friends advice was "if he starts to cry, just put on Cocomelon". After about 15 minutes of him screaming for his mommy I resigned and put it on and he immediately stopped crying - and literally everything else other than breathing - and just STARED at the TV with a unblinking gaze. I have become convinced that there is something in that show that just should not be seen by children. I had not really considered restricting my kids access to media prior to this, but it was honestly kind of frightening. I am far more afraid of whatever that is that Cocomelon contains than I am of their exposure to sex or violence.

The long and short is that I really don't know, and it worries me.
I'm a pilot. Yes, you're correct, but there was so much else going on here... unless you're certain it's wrong, you're going to be inclined to listen to the airplane when it screams at you not to do something in an already terrifying unfamiliar situation.
Dam in Norway partially bursts after days of heavy rain
I think that licences and copyrights are a useful litmus test in the move towards post-scarcity. If the copyright advocates win, you can expect even more artificial scarcity in the future with most people's living standards reduced to something worse than serfdom. If the copyright system can be weakened, then there is a chance that most people will see greater prosperity.

Currently, there is no viable way to access all that information without databases like the Z-Library or scihub/libgen. All those library subscriptions are just a legalised form of extortion, which are usually inaccessible if you aren't affiliated with a university (or not with the right one)
I watched some instagram video from MLB where players were mic’ed up - it was much more compelling than commentators.

It was more like twitch for baseball. I think that could be very compelling.
While I agree that it's legally murky in some respects, that seems like an opportunity (and a benefit to the writer of the OSS code) for a dialog between the maintainer and the user of AGPL code to ensure compliance.

Why would you want to open a bunch of loopholes for very specific and complex cases?
Brake based torque vectoring is crap. Change my mind.
Well, sometimes working frantically does get us bipolar folks somewhere, for example:

* To a place where other people see the value and join into the project before we burn out.

* To a place where a discovery or insight is made that is valuable without needing to be thoroughly polished. IMHO this is why so many brilliant mathemeticians are bipolar: once an insight is reached and communicated, value has been created. No debugging or security updates required :)
Been striving for the IndieHacker dream for years ;)

Easy to keep your motivation just by going and reading the forums and seeing the projects :: https://indiehackers.com

Can't say I've been able to quit my day job or even made enough to brag about but its put me on a path of creativity and ambition. In the process, I've learned so much and done so much including built my own web host, a series of different products, both paid and free, and spoken to so many people from all over the world.

While I still owe a mortgage or two... and I took too much time focusing on "adding the next feature" rather than just an MVP, I probably wouldn't change how I went about any of it.

I miss video games like crazy... but I keep saying to myself: "Goal is to be comfortable and able to retire by 45." If I can reach this goal, I also have some reward in mind for allowing myself to start gaming again.

I am still working my day job which is remote and afford me the time to work on side projects throughout the week and have no dreams of ever quitting, but figure out the niches that you are good at. My dream is certainly in automation, a one-man business with maybe a virtual assistant or two to answer support calls if any of my products were to be that in demand and grow to those heights.

So I learned that if you work on something you have no interest in and you don't use yourself, you're not going to go far. You need to solve your own problem first. And you have to find the niche market of people who either have the same problem or didn't even realize it was a problem until you pointed it out and you just made their lives so much easier.

But just like the lottery, unless you start playing, you won't accomplish anything. Good luck. Keep the innovation and dream alive!
Foxconn Working Conditions Controversy
You can't get a .ONG without being a registered NGO.
However I wonder what’s pulumi future gonna be with that move ? So you guys now are going to maintain a transpiller for a closed product, huh ?
This is such a wonderfully insightful comment. I think the bit about learning to worry only about the current issue is especially important, but the whole thing is gold.

My oldest just turned 7, and I have slowly learned that the kids do best and are happiest not when I set them up with the best possible environment or activities or rules or whatever, but when I’m consistently and actively engaged with them and considerate of their needs and perspectives as much as my own. Sometimes I worry that they might get too much screen time, but sometimes I go to wake them up and discover that they’ve snuck out of bed to quietly read together.

Address problems that need addressing as they arise, but try to remember that, on the balance, things turn out ok.
The wrinkle about "modern Game Genie" is that when the original debuted, there were no microtransactions.

Now, hastening grind runs directly counter to most(?) game revenue models.

Interesting times!
> Plenty of humans glitch out on random words (and concepts) we just can't get right.

We don't lose our marbles the way GPT does when it encounters those words. It's like it read the Necronomicon or something and gone mad.
They do need to fund it somehow, don't they?

It can also be (easily) argued that Z-Library is a definitive net-benefit to the humanity as a whole.
I have 9 and 11 year old boys
No screen time until they were 4. Even then if I think about it, it was more to give myself a break than for them, so I regret it.

they both have ipads now and swtiches and an xbox they share. They are only allowed on when I tell them they can play games. The ipads have internet access but everything is sent to our phones. They are forbidden to visit any social media, including youtube.

They have to get approval for any games they add to the systems.

We let them play games becuase their friends do and all the kids chat while doing it so its good for socializing. They can only friend people they know.

Oldest just got a phone. Internet is disabled. He can only text and call.

While it sounds like a lot, we have a good system, they know what games we will let them play and so dont push for anything else to much. Its really just about setting boundaries but giving them enough freedom that they dont push those boundaries.

My oldest did spend about $100 on fortnite once without telling us and so we locked that down. He knew it was wrong but did it anyway which is on me. He wont do it again (no physical punishment in my house, I just explained that i was disappointed and grounded him for a week). We had a good talk about it.

During summer they play a lot of games as I have to work and their friends are all online with them.
Not asked: “Why do this?”

So much of the literature takes the idea that this is something that should be built for granted, and only asks whether it should be done. I literally do not understand why anyone wants to build this in the first place.
I've never used it to pirate music, and half of the videos on youtube youtube doesn't own the rights to host. They just index them, surface and highlight them through the most popular (one of the few remaining) search engines in the world, and massively distribute them from some of fastest servers on earth until the rights owner notices and interacts with them personally or through a lawyer to complain.

It's how they built the business.
The RIAA is not a thing because of music artists[0], they were created by music labels to represent their interests.

The biggest mistake people make when talking about anything to do with copyright or the creative industry is to assume that, because publishers of creative works represent or hire authors, that we can just collapse authors and publishers down into a single entity and treat any copyright related argument purely as a struggle between artists getting paid and the public wanting free shit.

Of course, publishers do not have interests aligned with those of authors and artists. This is, at minimum[1], a three-sided war between publishers, authors, and customers. Artists want to be paid but need to go through a publisher to sell[2], while customers want to watch/listen/read but need to buy through a publisher. Publishers have massive incentives to screw over artists by reducing or diluting their take in favor of whatever keeps the machine fed.

While both publishers and artists need some kind of limited coercive copyright arrangement in order to have a market for their work, they tend to disagree heavily on who should own those rights and how long they should last. Artists want to sell the thing they made, but publishers want assets: they want a brand that can neatly fit on a marketing schedule or an accounting statement. The former only requires short term copyright owned by individual artists while the latter requires infinity-minus-one-day terms, four companies that own the world's culture, and increasingly expansive interpretations of DMCA 1201 that invent DRM out of things never intended to be DRM.

[0] Let's not call them "content creators"

[1] We can subdivide these groups further still, of course, but three groups is enough to make my point.

[2] As per [1] we are treating distributors and publishers as part of the same group of middlemen. For example, while Amazon Kindle self-publishing does not do some of the same marketing or promotion that a traditional book publisher might, they are still intermediaries between authors and readers.
Yes. That's the only place it's mentioned, IMHO it is central to the whole thing.
The less automated version is a list of requirements to the effect "list all the OSS libraries you use and their licenses" are pushed down to each team and someone spends a day or 2 going through their code base. Usually that amounts to looking at a lock/dependency file and finding the software's license online.

You can also run an audit against your artifact store/cache if you have one. JFrog Artifactory has built-in tools for auditing dependencies (and can act as a pull through cache) so you can run reports that way but it can be harder to tie dependencies to what's using them.

Back when I worked at Chase, it was against company policy so use 3rd party dependencies that weren't in their internal components database. Part of getting something in the components database was establishing an owner, the license, and the version (basically a paperwork/approval process). In addition, part of the deploy process was running a vulnerability check against your dependencies using some proprietary enterprise software that tracked CVEs and could (somewhat...) parse what dependencies an application was using (ideally, automatically...).
Squeeze the hell out of the system you have
For more info on BFFs: https://bff-patterns.com/