skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my experience with SQL, a query like that should return in under a second even if you have 100k or more users.

There are some other tricks you can use if you're clever/lucky as well. If you're just using integer IDs (which is reasonable if your system isn't distributed) then you could order by userid on you ContactMethod table and still get the same speed as you would with no join.
The "mass media" is not one organization. I haven't seen any news reports redefining what science is, feel free to provide evidence of that. Finally it's not a game of definitions because science has a specific meaning. You can't just change that meaning (even if you add a captial S) then be critical about it.

You're critical because some organization in the government lied? Nothing to do with science

You're mad because some scientist committed fraud? Nothing to do with science.

Peer reviewers aren't properly checking papers, that's their fault and or their university/company. Nothing to do with science.

The majority of scientists believed something through experiments that were faulty or limited data then later turned out to be wrong? That's how it works, science isn't perfect but what's the alternative?

If you aren't an expert in a field or willing to put massive amounts of time in researching something but you have to make a decision doing whatever the majority of people in a field say is the most logical course of action
You're absolutely right, thank you for the correction. he3-he3 doesn't produce neutrons, which is the major advantage, in addition to the massive energy output.

Here's an interesting link which lists various fusion reactions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium-3#Nuclear_fuel
I am not disagreeing with you - I believe that you should be able to use something you bought however you wish - but I think it is worth noting that the lower you allow depth of discharge, the more cycles you can squeeze out of a pack. So it’s not dead weight per se, its trading weight and range for pack longevity, which equates to economy over the life of the motorcycle.
> trust the vegans enough to know what is vegan and what is not

E.g. flour might not be vegan (or non-icky).

L-Cysteine is an amino acid and one of the most common reducing agents in baking. It is often extracted from various sources such as poultry feathers from ducks or chickens, cow horns, hog's hair, and even sheep wool. However, the L-Cysteine used in food can also be derived from human hair. Most of the hair used for L-Cysteine production originates from China, where it is collected from barbershops and hair salons. It can be created vegan in labs, but that would increase the price.

l-Cysteine offers many benefits:

- Gluten softening and dough relaxing

- Dough conditioning

- Reduced mixing and fermentation times

- Better dough consistency and easier handling

- Improved pan flow

Many bakers don't include it intentionally, they purchase the flour and it's already included.
> What does humanities need?

an LLM model soon (if not already) will be enough to provide humanities education.

I am not sure humanities research will even survive
As in Node.js or something else? I don’t know what the 787 uses but I do know that it is not node.js
> I built a startup and paid little attention to perf for years 1-5, and finally in year 6 we started to get bitten by some perf issues in specific tables, and spent a few engineer-months optimizing.

This screams of if I don’t see it it the problem doesn’t exist view of the world.

How do you know it’s not a problem? Perhaps customers would have signed up if it as faster?

The problem is also treating it in terms of business value and/or cost.

A lot of things are “free” and yet it’s ignored.

For most people, in simple cases like turning on http3, brotli, switching to newer instances and many others are all quick wins that I see ignored 90% of the time.

A good design, implementing some good practices etc are performance specific and don’t always cost more.
Why do you have less faith in rsc? Asking because I feel the opposite.
It’s literal dead weight. It’s especially bad because the bikes already don’t have great ranges (and the estimated ranges are often pretty optimistic), and extra dead weight cuts into your limited range even further.
I'm not / won't be a parent, so please take this with a grain of salt and not as an offense to your or anyone elses parenting.

I think the fact many of you have deeply thought about the topic is amazing, but what I wonder is if you, by restricting devices so heavily (and it's seemingly only about tables and smartphones), also take away any chance at kids getting proficient with computers?

Like, you know, the knowledge people here have: How computers work, hardware, programming.

Maybe it's just not mentioned here, but I see a lot about avoiding social media - which is fine, I get it - and not a lot about teaching kids how technology works.

When I was a kid, I sat at a computer (with my dad) with 3 and the internet starting at 5 or 6.

That said, the internet was very different in the 2000s. It lead to the current hobbies I have and I'm so happy I've had that chance. I, for example, experimented with my own phpMyBB forums at 14 because forums where cool back then.

I've seen reports of more and more younger people having no idea what a file system even is because they have never seen one before because they mainly grow up on tablets, and now they seem to have less of a chance to learn about tech at all because they've barely seen any tech - except smart devices - until they're teenagers.

Which, again, I understand completely. There are dangers online nowadays and I'd want to protect my kids, as well, but while reading all your posts, I felt a bit sad because it also felt like it may take something away, too.

Not an easy problem to solve. How does the crowd here see this?
Interesting, and I look forward to using it, but I wish the distribution had kept the folder-name conventions of AUTOMATIC1111, so that we could more easily have used symbolic links for folders of LoRAs and checkpoints etc. that we'd rather not duplicate.
I’m guessing you picked C++ out of those options?
The most difficult parts to obtain will be the power supply and vacuum chamber. Still, there's nothing like garage fusion!
I would like to first sympathize with you. That is a crappy situation to be in.

I also agree, "deliberate" is a bit too strongly worded.

So in order to lose the domain, there is just a very few modes of failure that has a 3rd party factor. In most case, the domain-owning entity is accountable for losing the access.
> it is real to me because I can observe myself experiencing it

There is no such thing as "real to me". You are observing a flower. Seeing that flower means having a visual perception caused by that flower. That visual perception presents your knowledge (indeed, is) your knowledge that there is a flower.

When I look at you holding a flower I see the flower and I see you holding it. There's no mystery here. The objects of my seeing are things in the world. There is no 'private world'.

> I certainly don't know enough about the state of my dogs mind

What you 'know enough' to say is irrelevant. The proposition that the dog is seeing a flower is true regardless of what you do, or do not know. Knowledge models reality --- reality doesn't model knowledge. The proposition is true; your theory of knowledge should be revised to account for it.

> I also have friends who have seen a purple flower

The presentation of knowledge we call a visual perception, uses the mechanism of presentation we call 'my visual system' (which includes what I have learned to see). Just as a mountain is presented by different cameras, with different lenses, in different perspectives.

Insofar as I make linguistic utterances based on this presentation I'm engaged in theorising about the causal origins of my perception. Here mistakes are possible, but quite uncommon. If we think the stick is bent, we need only take it out of water to realise that the prior visual perception was caused by the refraction of light.

In this manner we learn what the causal origins of our perceptions are; and hence, rarely make mistakes.

Visual systems may be better at recognising some features of the world than others -- some cameras have zoom lenses. Likewise some may be broken. How your visual system presents your knowledge via seeing is arbitrary (water color, pastel, chalk...). Its built only to ensure that you can reliably infer its causal origin (ie., properties of the world).

But this theorising is irrevelant to what's going on. The propositions, "i know there is a flower", "there is a flower", "i am seeing a flower directly" etc. are all true. Our ability to give a linguistic account of the causal origin of this knowledge is fallible, but reality isnt.
I suspect they could put a big dent in their $40 million deficit simply by wiping out their football program.

The head coach gets paid $4 million per year. Extrapolate that to the lackeys and you could probably wipe out almost half of the deficit.
What if your main data is in mysql?

Lack of consistency is not a big deal and you often don't have it at scale anyways.
Stars rely on gravitation to confine the plasma instead of magnetic fields, and they can reach the energy densities needed for other fusion reactions, typically D+D, which produces less neutrons. Also, there are hundreds of thousands of kilometers between the center of the sun and its outermost layers - neutrons produced in the core will have plenty of time to be absorbed by something else on their way out.
> this straw-man version of a lazy WFH employee

I thought performance management was all about managing results. So, I don't quite understand how "lazy WFH employee" could be a management headache.
Characterizing MAOIs as "stronger stuff" than amphetamines is just nonsense and I don't see how the context here would make it either meaningful or relevant.
Didn't see much of that going on either where FTX was concerned.
i’m sure there are ways around it no?
Arguably, the Air France incident was both a pilot and software problem. Although the software worked as designed, it contributed to the pilots' confusion. This was particularly true of the stall warning, which would reject angle of attack readings below about 60 knots forward airspeed but then sound again whenever the pilots did pitch down, the correct response to a high-altitude stall.
I didn't, but yes it was the one chosen before I got there.
Probably because it's not a very useful exit. The most successful law school applicants have degrees like history, classics, or math. A degree in legal studies (1) doesn't rank for getting into law school (or if it does, it's clearly not the what law schools want), (2) Looks a little useless/incomplete if you stop after the bachelor and don't go to law school.

FWIW people with 2 or 4 year degrees in law or justice and no other education seem to become probation officers in my experience, so I'm all for WVU sending that one into the ocean.
This is interesting, Gordon Gee is their current President. He was the president at Ohio State while I was there he was well-loved by the students and would routinely make appearances at off-campus parties and pose for photos with students. He also had a razor-sharp memory for people and recognized me multiple times when I bumped into him. But that wasn't his strongest suit, he was a fund raising machine, that man brought a lot of money into the university from alumni and other donors. I'm shocked to hear that WVU is having financial issues under his leadership.
I think it may depend on brands and models. When I take my specific Honda in for the scheduled maintenance, the dealer seems to apply a standard, Honda-dictated price, which is the same at all the dealerships I've visited. This usually includes the labor and replacement for the parts which the manual says need replacing on a schedule, except for fluids. If I need tires, brake pads, that's separate.

I know this is a fixed price because last time I took it in, it was a "bigger" service, where they had to check valve clearances. But apparently something went wrong when they tried to take apart something (I forget the details) so they had to work much longer than expected on it. In the end, I didn't have to pay more than I had expected, taking it in.

Now, all this isn't to say it's cheap. I was horrified with the prices: it often costs more than my Mercedes' service at a Mercedes dealership.
> iterators can be easily implemented with current Go features.

It's rare that can is relevant when it comes to language design. You typically can do anything in any language.

Adding dedicated support for iterators would promote it as the way to iterate. That would actually simplify the language - one way to express a common need as opposed to the current mess of ~5 different ways [1]:

"In the standard library alone, we have archive/tar.Reader.Next, bufio.Reader.ReadByte, bufio.Scanner.Scan, container/ring.Ring.Do, database/sql.Rows, expvar.Do, flag.Visit, go/token.FileSet.Iterate, path/filepath.Walk, go/token.FileSet.Iterate, runtime.Frames.Next, and sync.Map.Range, hardly any of which agree on the exact details of iteration. Even the functions that agree on the signature don’t always agree about the semantics."

Go would have been a far simpler language had it originally shipped with generics, iterators, and sum types.

[1] https://github.com/golang/go/discussions/56413
One problem with running x-year-old releases of web applications are bugs and vulnerabilities that have been discovered and fixed in those years. Are many people running the 3 year old, now properly OSS versions of Sentry in production?

Using BSL strikes me as trying to have a cake but eat it too: look, we're good open source guys using an open license. Feel free to use our code, but only after it is well beyond its best before date!
Less than 3. Job's simple when you don't charge by a book. I am not even particularly adept at it. Just familiar. Someone with thousands of bikes under their belt could probably reshim an engine in an hour.
There are also a lot of countries that WANT U.S. soldiers in their territory to deter Russia, North Korea and China from invading them.

Also the Libyan situation is a lot more complicated than that.
Yep, you can bleed it physically but the system will refuse to re-activate the ABS until you trigger something in the ROM. Absolutely insane. You can't get even order the tool directly from Triumph to do it because you need to be some kind of verified auto mechanic for them.

Even the oil change was a pain. I had to quite literally crush the dealer oil filter and break it off in pieces with a pipe wrench because it was shaped in such a way you needed a special tool to get a grip on it. I called the dealer, the tool was $180 and would take 3 weeks to ship. It only worked with Triumph brand oil filters (probably white labeled semi-custom K&N's) and they wanted $60 for a filter (vs. $14 for a K&N at the local bike parts store).

Even my best universal clamps + duct tape + sandpaper couldn't hold a grip on the stupid filter. Several trips to the local auto parts store trading wrenches back and forth until I said fuck it and went to Home Depot. Lucky for me a K&N oil filter fit exactly (dummies still used a standard thread for the oil filter port)...otherwise that would've been somewhat hard to explain. Even the crush washer for the drain plug was 10x as expensive... ended up taking the old one to Ace and finding a replacement for 10 cents. The only thing that was about equal in price was the recommended oil which I was able to score on sale at Walmart but otherwise would've been a wash.

As you can tell I can not stop complaining about this stupid thing. Do yourself a favor and avoid Euro motorcycles.
"We're Sorry
The page you were looking for could not be found."
Modernity is when you pilot society using science. See: EPCOT and Disney’s vision in the 1950 of building entire cities with everything perfectly entirely planned.

So when you control science, you control the laws. And you can’t control science, but you can control the press around science, and how people talk about science.
Does anyone know how well a fine-tuned Llama model will do compared to GPT 4 on complex tasks?
I’ve always been fascinated by the idea of speaking multiple languages, but the basic fact is that technology is clearly going to make the idea of speaking different languages completely irrelevant in the next few years. We’ll all have real time Rosetta stones in our pockets, at which point why not just everyone speak the same language going forward?

I get that there’s something romantic about the idea of regional dialects, but practically speaking in a global world with advanced tech, it’s simply only a point of friction.
I appreciate advices, but I believe this one is not on point I expressed, as it only reiterates on a premise that I follow already but find mostly useless irl.
Exactly, we'll already hear 787s crashes all over if they're using node.

I like node, but they'll be stupid to use it for aviation instrument software.
Coccinelle is an interesting project, relatively widely used by the Linux kernel developers. Some examples on their website:

https://coccinelle.gitlabpages.inria.fr/website/sp.html

https://coccinelle.gitlabpages.inria.fr/website/rules/
Pointing out flaws and inconsistencies in studies can be done by individuals and are a relevant contribution to the scientific process, for example.
I think there was an article recently about the Archive site refusing connections that go through the cloudflare 1.1.1.1 DNS.
If go had monads…
Empire builders love to see and display their footsodiers. Nothing like sweeping a gaze over a big plateau with a few 100 serves to affirm your confidence.
Sophisticated, Highly-Targeted Attacks Continue to Plague NPM
Oops, my bad on the typos. Thanks for the correction.
Helion is planning to use a different fusion reaction, one where the bulk of the energy will be coming out as charged particles, not neutrons.

However, D+T fusion is the only type of fusion that we have been able to sustain for any significant amount of time with reasonable energy inputs. What Helion is planning to do is completely unexplored and requires some major scientific advances.
The app isn't free, sadly, but I love the UI, though.
(2020)

Confusing update of an article perhaps but the title should reference the incidents being years in the past some way
is a result of comp sci, no?
Learn assembly: you will get these “tricks” automatically.

To be honest it is way more efficient to read these long posts.
He wasn't under strong direct pressure from govt until after fleeing with secret docs. The actions he took after that can't justify his theft and flight abroad. The theft and flight abroad, however, were disproportionate relative to the harm that he was suffering from personally (metadata collection, eavesdropping, both of which he had the technical knowledge to protect himself from).

I'm not trying to balance actions against one another in some form of equation to see what the net good is. That doesn't make sense. It reminds me of Dave Chappelle's skit about trying to process rape allegations against Bill Crosby. He was a great comedian. And probably a rapist. Well, Snowden is similarly complicated.
> Even non-pilots who play video games have enough common sense not to do that

But in video games you likely have good visibility and an external view. AF447 did neither. The human ear is actually really terrible from telling a pitch up stall condition from a pitch down overspeed one, lacking visual references.[1]

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensory_illusions_in_aviation (somatogravic)
I started to read, then I scrolled down and it got dark and insisted I must create an account to read more.

The irony of this headline is not lost on me hahaha.
I suppose it depends what you mean by graph theory without linear algebra. Graphs can be represented as matrices without losing anything, so as such you can go from graphs to matrices and do everything you would do with graphs alone.

For describing algorithms sticking with just the notion of graphs is convenient however, as it allows you to speak of edges, nodes, colours etc. keeping things easier to grasp.

Also, there are notions such as planar graphs which probably don't have a nice interpretation in the linear algebra point of view only.
This is nonsense. WGS and philosophy probably cost nothing and just aren't on the radar. They want to eliminate the higher ed administration program.
Very simple, because they don’t have enough domain knowledge, and in addition, they will assume many things and blame others (the user) and still act superior towards people who actually use the product.

I’ve seen it so many times, so I’m not surprised by this at all
>Intel and AMD seem to have settled on sticking a relatively small (but still significant die-wise) GPU

Intel yes, but AMD only finally began integrating a GPU into most of their CPU line up with the latest Zen 4 generation.

>a large, powerful [integrated] GPU that a relatively small segment of the market wants

I think you're underselling the demand there, particularly if the M* line of CPUs with iGPUs from Apple are anything to go by.

Like I said before, people want powerful graphics processing at an affordable (FSVO affordable with regards to Apple) price.

>and you still have loads of people who don't want the GPU at all.

Intel's been doing iGPUs for well over a decade now because "loads of people" do want iGPUs.

Enthusiasts and professionals alike want them because they are a Lowest Common Denominator fallback for when shit hits the fan. People on a budget (whether monetary or electric) want them regardless of their poor performance because they need a display output, especially in recent years.

And even if you have a discrete GPU anyway, an integrated GPU is still useful to have for offloading certain tasks.

>It just doesn't make sense to fully integrate them unless die area is so cheap that power consumption is the main limiting factor

Five years ago I would have completely agreed with you, but with how bloody expensive discrete GPUs are now I feel there's a vacated market segment where integrated GPUs with sufficient performance and reasonable pricing can come in to conquer and dominate; not unlike how discrete sound cards became extinct when integrated sound cards became Good Enough(tm).
Not obscure at all. They are also invested in all the other lucrative service businesses that feed and clean and move and supply all those offices. And then there's the leases on the office buildings they own that are under threat etc etc.
Airbus has invested in applying software verification for a while (https://www.di.ens.fr/~delmas/papers/fm09.pdf). I haven’t seen as much sustained interest in formal verification in industry in the US as I’ve seen in Europe, so I’m guessing this may contribute at least a little to the difference. Fortunately more US companies are starting to take this stuff more seriously.
different languages come with entirely different ways of thinking and reasoning about the world - it would be a shame to throw that away
i know! it’s hard to make offline because of gpu requirements
> Yet I know that in other countries (e.g., Japan) there is a belief that any job, no matter how humble, is worth doing well and that passion for excellence is a virtue

That's a reason why the quality of most Japanese products is superlative. Another nation that is passionate about their stuff are Italians, but they value good looks and good food above all. The US values profits and growth and China values high output volumes.

If one works in a Fortune 500 company they're probably creating value for shareholders instead of changing the world. What they are primarily changing is the income gap, by making the rich richer.