skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's why I always say programming is the easiest profession. It's mostly reasoning and very little instinct, spatial intelligence, memory, or anything like that. It's all stuff that can be described and taught.

There's nothing like driving where you have to see stop signs and know to stop, but also be able to do other things besides just watch for stop signs, and you have to instantly know where the brake is and not confuse it for the gas.

Math seems to be a special case. Math can't be done algorithmically my humans in a practical way. If you did you would be mentally stepping through the code of a CAS solver, and people don't appear to be doing that, plus if someone is doing math outside of school it's likely because no algorithm exists already, so it doesn't appear to be a pure reasoning task in practice despite theoretically being exactly that.
I couldn't focus on audiobooks for a long time so I avoided them for years.

At some point I started listening to Youtube scary stories at night to wind down while cooking or running since it wasn't a big deal to miss out. And then I realized I could eventually maintain full concentration while multitasking and gave audiobooks another try successfully.

So maybe it's a muscle you have to exercise for some of us.
i bought some chips somewhat recently and the serving size was listed as "6 chips".
yeah I think my issue stems from getting taught that wigwam was a synonym for longhouse when we learned the terms in school in the Northeast (like dead in the middle of an Iroquois nation). Haudenosaunee (endonym for Iroquois) literally references the longhouse. Wigwam has nothing to do with longhouse! It's an Algonquian word (further East from the Iroquois). Will keep this in mind.
> The government doesn't need to be able to access when I watch porn, what porn I watch, where I watch it at, and all the other BS info that is most likely being collected by the sort of methods they're implementing.

The government does need to be involved when you're producing and distributing porn, though.

This law isn't forcing porn distributors to collect data on their customers and turn it over to the government. It's making sure distributors are verifying the age of their customers, and disclosing health risks to them, just like we do with alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.
I don't think either of us are looking for keyframe tooling (or skills), but rather a Visio-like tool which has the animations built into common components, like connectors.
No its just super clunky for anyone not on a Mac using Chrome or Safari. Windows implementation right now is pretty basic, and Firefox hasn't really got theirs right at all either.

Honestly unless you have a security key, or a mac I wouldn't bother right now. Going all in on Passkeys when a significant majority of devices don't fully support it yet is a bit silly.
> The US/Hollywood is far more prudish since my youth.

The prudishness manifested differently. I recall a lot more nudity and at least as many sex scenes in movies I watched as a kid (under 18).

Highlander

Lethal Weapon

Robocop

Life of Brian

Even OG Batman had some nudity and referenced sex in it as a PG-13.

Exposed breasts and sex scenes were pretty common. Full frontal nudity was even relatively common. And sometimes wouldn't even garner an R rating.
AI will transform the way science gets done
> Yeah this. Humans aren’t destroying life on earth they’re changing it and forcing new species to evolve. Who knows how weird the world will be in a million years: what creatures will evolve to feed on humans.

Is this even remotely likely given how much control we have over our environment? It surely wouldn't be any other predatory animal, we wouldn't let it come to that. Microbes, viruses, bacteria something like that maybe but those aren't "feeding" on humans in the common sense of the word.
Your analysis is wrong.
From a democratic majority point of view, the current government had a very narrow majority(49.9% of cast votes) but since then it lost in all polls almost 15% of its support. The majority of Israelis clearly oppose the legistlation, and they are very very angry about it.

So why would a democratic government insist on passing laws that cost it its chance to win the election and are going to be overturned by the next government, and risk a heavily antagonistic policy against the current coalition's interests, by the next likely govermnent?

In a democratic framework it makes no sense. The only way it could make sense is if the current coalition is planning to break the democratic system, and engineer unfair elections, and unfair political system, like in Turkey and Hungary.
And all the coalition's rethoric and other actions hint in this way like a giant flashing neon sign the size of a skyscrapper.

So as pretty as your theory may sound this is a completely different scenario.
If I’m not mistaken that’s only for arbitrary precision, which is not realistic.
The projects license is of no concern at all here. Licenses do not bind the owner of the code. Hashicorp required a CLA before contributing, so they own the copyright. They can change the license at any time as they see fit.
I havent read the full transcript, but I find it terrifyingly fascinating how the US has managed to turn Snowden into a pariah, owing in part to its own revoking of his passport while in transit through Russia.

Anybody who saw him speak knows he was doing everything possible to make it about the content, and not him as a person- only putting his name to the light to prove it wasn't false or the result of some disgruntled employee trying to stick it to his manager.

Yet the narrative very quickly focused on him; the content of his character, his upbringing, his connection to the government, the fact that he is in Russia and decidedly not on the content of the leaks which quickly got glossed over and to date I am unaware of single arrest due to it- despite clear evidence of lawbreaking (including but not limited to: deliberately lying to the Senate).

Lets not forget that diplomatic plane that was downed across international territories because they suspected Snowden was inside.

Despite posing no continued threat to the US, they sure spent a lot of effort making him as uncredible as possible yet anyone who has eyes sees it as completely transparent.

The scariest part of it all is that people actually are falling for that narrative, do not look at the leaks for what they are (proof of unconstitutional behaviour by a branch of government) and call Snowden a plant or a terrorist- ironically the kinds of people who would otherwise argue against government interference. Boggles my mind, and scares me to death how clearly susceptible the population is to disinformation.
If it were a week to actually get better productivity, and that setup never broke later, then sure. It doesn't really help because of how few things are actually runnable in the debugger (basically just unit tests). Nobody else on my team even uses the debugger, they only use IDEs out of comfort, and so far they've had to switch IDEs 3 times in 3 years.

Past jobs had similar caveats. The only time I've ever been able to use a debugger consistently was in school.
You're ok with cutting off a large number of potential users? Passkey isn't exactly working well on Firefox or Windows right now.
Services like this are actively in use by most Banks/ATMs around the world on most mobile carriers, just via creative but common reusing of long standing mobile/telco protocols.

GSMA are actively attempting to lockdown them existing methods, as they’re built on trust in a very untrustworthy environment between carriers, and in some cases state actors.

Sure on the face of it this isn’t brilliant to the average HN reader, but with context it’s a significant improvement vs where we are today.
My contempt is so great I will not even type their name.
It is illegal to create or possess a fake ID in my state, which can result in 6 months in prison, a fine, and suspension of your driver's license.

Its also safe to assume such ID would be directly associated with my account, which of course would also require an email address. This effectively kills anonymous viewing of adult content on the internet, while also letting companies build and sell profiles about you.

We give up so much to solve what? A problem that hasn't been quantified in either scope or harm?
There are some countries (I guess in EU) that make some plans to try to create offerings to move Israeli startups to their countries. Presentations circulated a couple of months ago, those are a couple of snaps that I made https://imgur.com/a/nfxedGB
I guess you missed the "not" Google proposal for the Browser Attestation API? No need to put too many respurces fighting for a single site when you can just lock it down to blessed browsers.
The tweet is referring to a paper that fine tunes Chinese dataset on english base model. I'm not surprised with LoRA's poor result in this setup.
If all you care about is the results, or even specifically just the visible part of the costs, then there's no such thing as cheating.

That's both why I'm fine with the AI "cheating" by the transistors being faster than my synapses by the same magnitude that my legs are faster than continental drift (no really I checked) and also why I'm fine with humans "cheating" with evolutionary history and a much more complex brain (around a few thousand times GPT-3, which… is kinda wild, given what it implies about the potential for even rodent brains given enough experience and the right (potentially evolved) structures).

When the topic is qualia — either in the context "can the AI suffer?" or the context "are mind uploads a continuation of experience?" — then I care about the inner workings; but for economic transformation and alignment risks, I care if the magic pile of linear algebra is cost-efficient at solving problems (including the problem "how do I draw a photorealistic werewolf in a tuxedo riding a motorbike past the pyramids"), nothing else.
> the wendelstein 7x is never going to generate usable electricity

What's the reason for that?
I have a 9 year old and 11 year old. They get 30 minutes a day for consumption, e.g. YouTube and games. They generally get all little more on weekends, when traveling, etc.

I review their YouTube usage monthly, and I also play games with them some. Anything inappropriate, we talk about it.

They get "unlimited" time for creative activities such as Roblox Studio, iMovie, and such. They're growing up in a digital world, they need to know how to use them as tools. It's unlimited in that I Don't put a time limit on it, but if they're staying on it for hours I make them take breaks.

They also get extra time if they're connecting with people, or using it for education.

No social media till an undetermined time.
No but its moving there, you don't need to be political expert to see it. Its also not a matter of past few months. Its a country in quite an unique situation which I don't fully comprehend so can't comment much, but West bank situation is beyond sad and I don't see any hope for improvement.
Yeah, we actually needed to 'test' in production. I wrote tests for how it was supposed to work, and made the best effort to reduce the risk, but the only way to get a reproducible environment for this particular issue was to deploy the change. That definitely contributed, though was not exclusively the cause of, the risk aversion.
> What's wrong with monetization? You understand that OSS's significant problem is a lack of funding, where authors don't want or don't know how to monetize their product?
> Sentry looks like a good model for OSS, and it's proof that you can make a living from OSS.

Sentry is using the BSL, the very same license that HashiCorp has switched to but that change has not been received well.
"Simply emigrate to another country, bud, you are choosing to live with the car culture"
I won't like to criticize someone with a different trade skill (much less when they're already dead), but to paraphrase two of my CFI friends, their summary view was "Bonin acted stupidly". He didn't communicate he had controls, kept pulling the stick to nose up. The pilot psyche element had lot to play in this accident. He was sticking to a naive understanding of aerodynamics in panic - which was counterfactual - rather than counting on prior training experience (like what we developers would say an antipattern). Relaying a similar point, his training still wasn't enough to gather situational awareness & apply common-sense instead of a panicky behavior.
Only the code in HashiCorp's own code is covered by the CLAs, not the code in the third-party dependencies it has. If said dependencies used copyleft licenses like (A)GPL instead of pushover licenses like MIT, that would have prevented what HashiCorp did.
It's worth noting that you can generally divide much faster if you know the divisor ahead of time, because you can turn it into a multiplication problem. But doing this takes some effort, as compared to turning subtraction into addition which is trivial.
> b) because natural predators have been eradicated in the previous centuries.
"interaction of dopamine and acetylcholine systems in the rat ... to direct D-amphetamine administration ... The increases observed during amphetamine ... were both blocked by co-administration with the D1 antagonist ... but not with the D2 antagonist"

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9881866/

New paper models psychosis by administering amphetamines to mice, and concludes the D1 receptor is more important in psychosis.

Relative binding affinities for D1 and D2 of many antipsychotics shown here
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cns-spectrums/articl...

There are already 3 antipsychotics on the market that have a D1 binding affinity that is an order of magnitude higher than D2.
I remember trying Infiscal, and I was excited to see how good it is, the feature list in the OSS version, and its ease of use... What cooled me off is this limitation in OSS: "3 Infisical Projects, 3 Environments & 5 Team Members."

That's not nice. It's OK to limit SSO access to OSS and stuff like that. But limiting essential features - team members is a no-go.
I could probably have a security key in as little time as it would take to flash one of my $3 Pi Picos. I just don't think it would be a very good idea.
I'm pretty sure that's not a typo or a small fix, many people use scientific mode and type negative exponents and it gives this "2.6exp-2 == 0.6", it concerned me, so i tried to fix it, and opened a pr.
It's a research reactor, not a production reactor. Generating useful electricity was never the design goal. The goal was to learn how to build a reactor that could generate useful electricity.
https://github.com/ytdl-patched/youtube-dl/
Just FYI, Admiral Cloudberg has an article titled "Children of the Magenta", but it is related to a specific AA 965 crash in 1995.

https://admiralcloudberg.medium.com/children-of-the-magenta-...
Also there is a Code of Conduct associated with it that's much more restrictive than, "We'll comply with law enforcement requests if you are doing something illegal with the (sub)domain."

Nope.
It is basically a single huge matrix multiplication — you need some form of loop/repetition/recursion to be Turing complete.

Sure it is not a hard property, excel, css with mouse movements, game of life are all that, but they need a “possibly forever running” part.
>youtube-dl was bypassing geo-blocks.

I don't think it was. I've been told by youtube-dl that content is blocked in my region many times.

The article spells out how they claim youtube-dl is bypassing copy protection.
Mostly, they don't?

There should be more funding in this area, but at some point you've got to build it, and that takes a ton of time. Regulations/bureaucracy could be better but at the end of the day you're not going to cut off a ton of time safely.

Once you have a working model iteration gets much much faster, but we've simply been hitting walls for decades.
What models/architecture are they using?
Lab-grown ‘ghost hearts’ work to solve organ transplant shortage
The thing is even if CLion does what i want (TBH i doubt it[0]), i wouldn't use it anyway so i don't see a reason to spend money on it. Note that my issue wasn't so much that it was proprietary (though it is an issue[0]) but that it requires an internet connection to function.

After all i still have and can use Borland C++ 5, Delphi 2 and C++ Builder 1 to this day without requiring any sort of connection or having Borland's permission to use the software i bought. I can't do the same with CLion.

[0] CLion relies a lot more than Borland on external tools like GCC, CMake, GDB, etc meaning that not only it most likely does not provide all the integrated functionality i mentioned but there is also a very high chance it will stop working at some point as its dependencies are changing so you do need to rely on JetBrains to keep it up to date without having access to the source code.
their work cycling between shutout and useless is the norm in many cat-mouse industries such as anticheat, malware, drug precursors, you name it. the funds go to the fight and not the endgame, everyone except denuvo customers seem to have figured that
The article discusses how, when companies reach a certain size, tension arises "between owning your work and standing out, vs just doing the minimum". Plenty of folks on HN abhor doing the minimum and rightly so, but rarely is there discussion of the forces pushing programmers towards doing the minimum when they'd prefer to own their work.

At one place I consulted, there was an engineering manager who firmly pushed team members to own their work, at least verbally. Conflictingly, her idea of owning the work was to do it exactly as the organization and leadership directed, without complaint, and never raising any issues about how and what was being done.

How does a programmer own the work and stand out when the incentives reward conformity but punish going outside the lines?
> see FSFs "an agpl reverse proxy must first serve a notice it's AGPL before proxying onward"

Can you link to that requirement?
Extract the Kernel
The worst that can happen is you get brought into an expensive lawsuit.
Facism can also come with lack of rule of law which is undesirable for capital.
Per 100g doesn't make it easy to compare a bag of chips to a can of soda.

Unless you carry around a food scale to measure out all your snacks, I fail to understand why 100g^-1 is useful.

I would however be interested in a pie chart that displays the calories from different macros. Then tic tac would be 100% sugar and you could compare to soda, also 100% sugar, or chips, which are maybe 65% fat and 5% protein and 30% carbs.
To request a review you push the changes into a special branch namespace in the reviewer's repository. IntelliJ uses / as a way to organize branches into folders, so it's easy to see what review requests come from who. You can also inform them in other ways (CCing on a ticket, email, chat, etc).

We use a kernel model in which there is no shared repository, so it's impossible for branches to be merged without being reviewed because it's the reviewer who merges them when they're satisfied.
This is very strange. There is no such limitation. You can create as many projects and environments as you need. You can also add an unlimited number of users
Ken's first language is pretty tolerant of programmer silliness, maybe too much.
CausalPy – causal inference for quasi-experiments
Of course you can compare apples to oranges, but if you know that a huge amount of the population is allergic to citrus fruit, it's just a waste of time to compare their dimensions or prices.

It's not arbitrarily chosen, and I wouldn't call it a criterion. I am arguing that they are different products for so different audiences, that all other criteria don't really matter.

> both of those products aim to provide secure tunnelling/network connectivity

You are talking about technical capabilities, but that still doesn't make them similar products. Figma and Miro are not similar products, just because they both provide an infinite canvas and team collaboration capabilities.
At the moment we don't offer support for HSM but please make a request for it in our github issues https://github.com/Infisical/infisical/issue
"The last time Royal Assent was refused was in 1707, when Queen Anne refused to assent to a bill to settle the militia in Scotland, and the last time the monarch made an in-person appearance to provide assent was in 1854."[1]

[1] https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2013-09-17/uni...).)
Air speed is relative to the air around the plane, not the ground.
My parents did this to me. Please don't. It was a huge burden on my social development at a critical time. The trials and tribulations of school suck, but are needed challenges in a teens life.
Open Source is not a business model. It's marketing, for sure, but you can't make money solely by giving away your product.

Every single open source company eventually learns this when they have a strong competitor. Eventually you are forced to stop being open source, because no business wants to compete solely on the strength of their service quality.

Moreover: a community is antithetical to a corporation's interest in the software. Corporations don't give a shit what people want changed in the code, for good reason: their purpose is to make money, not make good software. So business source always ends up annoying and limited while community open source provides the functions the users need, in the way they want them.

So, yeah, you can make money while letting people read your source code. But the actual quality of the end result, the user's happiness, the ability to contribute to the whole thing, is much different in a real community project.
Interpolation is potentially problematic but frequently necessary. Concatenation is pretty much always flat out wrong.
If your total comp is 600k and spending a few thousand gives you cold sweat maybe your barriers are just psychological. Don’t be so afraid to take risks that you forget to live at all.
> We should always put off significant complexity increases as long as possible.

Reminds me of the mantra that I’ve read here to easily go for reversible things and very careful when going for irreversible things.
In my opinion, "having no opt-outs" is not a benefit. It's by definition having less functionality. Infisical offers native SDKs, API, and CLI too + many other features (such as native integrations, webhooks, dashboard, etc).
what next, an open source DRAM controller? :D
We are researching fusion technology. It would take a reactor many times larger to get more energy out of the facility than you put in. The technology still needs to mature before a reactor that size would be financially responsible.
Is it kind of like “If HE becomes president, I’m moving from the US!” and then nobody actually moves?
Last time I saw this mentioned here a few weeks ago someone mentioned that the whole code has no tests.

Is that (still) true? If so: No
It’s not a throwaway account, I just like watching people get twisted about a name instead of content.
Let’s encrypt was a huge quality of life saver of working with certificates before. They fully automated the process for the most popular servers.
The AGPL itself certainly has no rule against any startups using it. Where specifically does the prohibition you're talking about come from?