skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
First - please seek some professional help immediately - you are not alone, and these feelings are common in people who've had a setback. Perhaps there's a slight chemical imbalance in your brain that needs to be reset - but only a professional can guide you there. Perhaps, all you need is some time to reflect and unwinds. Just don't make any rash decisions that have permanent consequences.

RE: startup failing.

"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
- Thomas Edison

Having a startup fail is, in itself, a success. At least you tried and with the failure, you learn things that you can use with the next startup.

Don't give up. There's so much negativity in the news we're not seeing the positive sides of things. Technology is advancing quickly and we're on the verge of a new age. It'd be a shame to not see how it turns out.
Exactly. The weights (different for each key) plus the total mass of the action (also different for each key) then shows up as inertia as you try to move the key (and you will need some force to overcome any friction) and I think that is where you will find your real difference.

Edit: so, I've found an image:

https://creativemarket.com/product/15418366-White-wooden-key....

If you look at the sides of the key you see two gray circles, those are lead weights, and they, more than anything determine the balance and weight of the key. Note that there also is a weight on the near side of the key! The weights on bass keys will be a bit larger at the back than for the treble side, and the hammers are also a bit heavier. You can still tune a lot in the action, but another major factor is simply friction. If there is lots of play in the pin that the key rides on it can make the action feel 'loose' all the way to unplayable (because the key will rub the keys next to it), and if it rides too tight (or has been twisted out of true) it will work so hard against the felt that you need a lot of force to overcome the friction. This all shows up as perceived weight, but it really isn't. It's just friction.

Piano actions are fascinating, apparently simple but they are really small works of art for each and every key. All the parts have to work 'just so' and they then still have to be regulated to get a really even action. One really nasty little thing that can happen is that the pins in the various action bits are corroded, this can cause lots of friction in ways that can be hard to track down to any specific linkage.
Blaise Pascal: The Infinite Spaces, Alienation, and the Wager
> Everyone bitches about the problems they have when they get shipments from herky jerky companies like Laser

Let's not forget OnTrac, where I've had them show up at nearly 11 PM and chuck a package out the driver's side window into the bushes. I thought I was about to be the victim of a drive-by. In a way it was.
The issue is these things become real when the populists get voted in. So it’s not just a fantasy.
You can always implement tagged unions in any language with untagged unions, so in a broad sense you can emulate sum types in situations where they make sense but use simpler code elsewhere. I might do that in C. Depends on the situation. It also obviously isn't a proper answer, I am sure you will agree, to just emulate the feature that I am saying is unnecessary. That works in Lisp where you can elegantly add language features with proper macros. In C, you cannot.

I would probably simply do in C the same thing as usual:

int
function1(int arg1, int arg2, int *out1, struct foo *out2)
{
if (part1(arg1, out1))
return 1;
if (part2(arg2, *out1, out2))
return 1;
return 0;
}

// Oh hmm, some callers can do something useful with a partial result.
// Assume the internals are more complex, because obviously in this simplified example you
// could just make them call part1 directly.

enum { SUCCESS, PARTIAL_SUCCESS, FAILURE }
function2(int arg1, int arg2, int *out1, struct foo *out2)
{
if (part1(arg1, out1))
return FAILURE;
if (part2(arg2, *out1, out2))
return PARTIAL_SUCCESS;
return SUCCESS;
}

This is compatible with old callers, even, who treat any nonzero result as failure and any zero result as complete success (the normal pattern in C).

Yes, the caller needs to check the result and avoid looking at out2 if you dont get SUCCESS and avoid looking at out1 if you get FAILURE. But this sort of thing is de rigeur in C. Your compiler (or a linter, and optional warning flags are essentially linters anyway) will warn you if you ignore the result and if you switch on the result will warn you if you ignore a case.

But obviously it is left up to you to avoid the "dont touch X if Y" stuff. Eh, that is in my experience not the hard bit of writing C. The hard bit is anything involving dynamic lifetimes or shared mutable state. The nice thing is that you can avoid this in C! Most people don't. The easy path is calling malloc everywhere and getting yourself into a muddle. The simple path, which is better in the long run, is to use values and sequential, imperative code. And if you do that, you realise that C's design makes way more sense. That is how it was designed to be used. Dynamic lifetimes of objects? It is like trying to use Rust to represent linked lists. People that say 'Rust sucks because double linked lists lol' are morally equivalent to people that say 'C sucks because malloc and free lol', it is like.... Yeah you aren't meant to do that!
Seems to be up to the manufacturers and/or the carriers. Samsung doesn't have this for example even on my S21 running Android 13.
Tax fuel instead if we care about the environment. Let the market decide how to prioritize.
What else would you expect from a structured logging package?

To me it absolutely makes sense as the default and standard for 99% of applications, and the API isn't much unlike something like Zap[0] (a popular Go structured logger).

The attributes aren't an "arbitrary" concept, they're a completely normal concept for structured loggers. Groups are maybe less standard, but reasonable nevertheless. The timestamp is not required - the documentation specifies it can be left as the zero value and shall be ignored in that case.

I'm not sure if you're aware that this is specifically a structured logging package. There already is a "simple" logging package[1] in the stdlib, has been there for ages, and isn't particularly fast either to my knowledge. If you want really fast you take a library (which would also make sure to optimize allocations heavily).

[0]: https://pkg.go.dev/go.uber.org/zap

[1]: https://pkg.go.dev/log
Software Development vs. Software Engineering: Which Career Path Suits You?
Haha, thanks! :D "Crispy" is such a perfect adjective to describe the bass strings on this piano. They are delightful.
It’s about giving the domain experts who understand what the requirements should be a way to build something without having to have the domain knowledge of code.
"Please disable JS and enable your ad blocker."

https://web.archive.org/web/20230808200819if_/https://www.th...
My manager protects me from meetings and gets me the things I need.

I like my manager.
shoulda bought the threadripper the intern recommended than buying that vulnshit your ISV recommended to you
Oh! The customers would also verify their e-mail address at the same time, by sending a message from it. But of course, to do any analytics, you'd have to parse the messages.
Fuck google. Use GitHub codespaces + GitHub copilot + Vercel if this workflow is what you really want.
I personally enjoy using WeWork, the offices are miles beyond anything I’ve seen in the corporate world, in terms of decor, style and design.

They’re not particularly social, however. I’d honestly expect them to be able to ticket networking events, for the actual members. I’d probably be interested in attending, it’s not that easy to find or meet professionals in the same city, with similar interests…
Likely far more of the former than the latter per medicine's track record in the last couple decades
I like how you start of with something substantiated, and then follow it with something fringe and unsubstantiated

Please tell me you’re at least selling coffee mugs to your flock
The reason that people need to gather precise requirements that are precise is because the specifications -> product loop is long. Imprecision results in lots of wasted effort.

If that loop is shortened drastically, then trying, checking and tweaking is suddenly a much more viable design method. That doesn’t require a precise set of requirements.
Shameless plug of my failed project: https://paulrouget.com/k8mod

The idea was to literally fit a Nordic SoC in a Casio watch, and update the screen to show more segments.

I never managed to find someone to manufacture the screen sadly.
I've never seen a structured logging library with concepts like Attrs, Groups, or Records like those defined by slog.
Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.
> On the early internet, it was all personal sites.

Personal sites maybe but people wrote about stuff they liked. There were thousands of sites that just covered some niche topic or what today would be called a fandom. Sure there were sites that were just someone's journal about themselves but easily just as many semi-authoritative topic focused ones.

The Internet Archive has a number of scans of old "Internet Yellow Pages" books and Wayback archives of DMOZ and Yahoo!'s directory. Take a look some time, for any given subject there's tons of sites listed with tildes in the path.
> It said the attack had “used a sophisticated infiltration method, intended to evade our checks”, which was why it had taken so long to detect.

They seem pretty clear that it was an attack rather than accident, but I agree the details seem intentionally vague. Maybe it wasn't quite that sophisticated after all...
its the banks who are paranoid...in fact its the anti-laundering laws compliance which is forcing us all to ridiculous security practices, with the taxman taking a ride on top of it of course
> My current YT setup has been working perfectly fine for me to discover cool stuff.

This passage shines above the rest of the complaints, which feel more philosophical than tangible to me.

The HN consensus mostly just points out the opinion of a small and vocal community. M

In your screenshot you scrolled past the results to a different section of the page. Keep scrolling and you get more results (maybe that’s bad UI but again like you said it’s working perfectly).

It’s also notable that the more popular TV, tablet, and phone apps don’t work this way.
are you intentionally being obtuse?
Dynalang: A multimodal AI agent with a language-world model
ESPN signs gambling deal with Penn, which sells Barstool back to Dave Portnoy
The tracking part is more telemetry for their delivery optimization algorithm. (Think the classic traveling salesman problem.) For example, UPS drivers are generally prohibited from making left turns because it's considered less efficient to do so.

UPS drivers are personally held responsible for packages placed in their custody.
Thank you for that.

I had `||www.youtube.com/|`, but it didn't always work.
The original Korean team paper was supposedly a rushed job because of inside fight at the research center, so it is expected the quality is poor by default. We still have to wait for a more polished proper research paper from the team to judge whether it is legit or not (APL material is their choice of journal I believe). We can speculate whether the Korean team has achieved superconductivity or they are under delusion based on replication papers published on arxiv, but such papers have never come under the scrutiny of peer review process as well. So I would reserve my conclusion about this at this stage. It is just frivolous to say whether LK-99 is superconductor or not for now.
When people say GPT-X has "passed the turing test" I am reminded of these glitches which simply do not happen to a typical person. I have encountered other issues where a slight change in phrasing leads to totally different types of output, despite the meaning of the two phrasings being the same to a normal person.
Hm, it seems to work fine for me: https://chat.openai.com/share/f8496236-949f-4f5b-86f2-0eaf31...

It was very funny to watch, though, so a worthwhile experiment.
Have you tried crying about the fact that you are getting traffic to your website that nobody would see otherwise?

I hope daddy government treats you well.

Count on Big Brother to save you, and they will beat you down when it's time as well.
We work founder? Not just millions. Billions.
Worth is a subjective concept, Yosemite might have negative GDP but might be worth very high value for many of us due to its natural beauty. We are talking here about cellphone towers, availability of good infra will mostly dependent on GDP of that region.
I believe the more common terms are “vulture capitalists” or “vampire capitalists”.
PGO is opt in, just like Rust. you have to explicitly tell the compiler that you want to use it.
I'm intimately familiar with structured logging.

The domain concepts defined by slog are unquestionably abnormal.

From a structured logging package I would expect a far simpler Logger API with a Log method something like

Log(pairs ...KeyValuePair) error

or maybe

Log(r Record) error

and no concept of Attrs or Groups or (explicit) Handlers.
> Measured by customer achievement, we have been fortunate to sustain +20% growth for many years.

Sorry moose, but the stock's down this quarter. Looks like we'll have to disrupt your life over it.
There have been multiple videos of tiny LK99 specs completely levitating on single magnets, and resisting motion when pushed, and staying afloat when the magnet is inverted.

That is not possible in any known material. Unless thats an array of very elaborate fakes, its a RT superconductor.

But the simulation papers and conductance tests make me suspect its a topological superconductor that would fail such tests.
OK, fine, I'll bite. How have they been lying about AIDS?
And how would you send CC infos? In the clear via the mailto as well? D:
Tools aren't all made the same. Some are made equally well for novices and experts, and some require expertise. It's not a "design smell". Haven't you ever used a tool that wasn't made for toddlers?
For the case/battery compartment part, hit up someone with a 3D printer (or a makerspace or library that has one)
7500 federal credit?
I played the organ in Liepaja, it was amazing. I'd move there if I could just to help keep it in shape. And yes, those should be preserved, there isn't all that many of them left. And organ component manufacturers are going out of business as well (Laukhuff, recently :( ).

Ah, I've found the pianist: it's Horowitz (I mistakenly thought it was Rubinstein), read here for some fascinating bits of piano lore:

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php?topic=20859.0
> It's not anticompetitive that apps don't automatically trust every new phone that comes into existence.

Creating a mechanism that enables such things to happen obviously is. Google knows well that:

> Apps not trusting a phone is a major drawback of a phone.

and Google having the dominant position created and now controls that "trust", and actively abuses it to force its unremovable spyware onto users' devices. And when the user dares to remove them, then poof - they're not " trusted" anymore.
This is a bad week for speculative execution.
These are excellent, thank you.
> but ice would still be a problem

If they play this right, ice won't be a problem in the near future.

> The biggest issue while building the Panama canal

Don't forget about that pesky mosquito
Is this just an issue with the way the editor is presenting the LSP feedback to you?
The most expensive HTTP 302 of all time, apparently.
I can't wait for ShoelacesCon. Last year I couldn't make it; I was all tied up.
How do we get ourselves back to a state in which society at large is able to discuss facts?
The problem with system packaging is there are so many systems. For example if you only package something for Debian, how should a Fedora, Arch, Gentoo or even Mac and Windows user use that?
But wasn’t it also forbidden because of the damage or wear it causes to the airport buildings and infrastructure?
ESPN Enters Sports Gambling in $2B Deal with Casino Company
This also works in Gnome & KDE on Linux & BSDs etc, just FYI :)
HN title is more editorialized than TFA! "Obviously"?
You seem frustrated with the environmentalist perspective. I think it's a common sensibility to just want to engage with engineering problem and theory craft solutions, don't let ant pesky things like conservation slow the discourse down, it's ballast!

The fact is we're all playing at our ideals here. This is a message board, we dont decide policy. Consider having some more empathy for people who prioritize different things than you do.
> You named one, injuries. Can you really not think of more?

No, I can't - I said injuries and deaths. Those are the factors I think we should use to determine if these cars are legal. You said we should consider other factors, then when asked you cited one of my factors instead of other factors then asked me to give you examples of other things. If you think there are other factors to be taken into account, say what they are.

> And I'll note you conveniently skipped over the case where car companies just skipped over worrying about the dog at all because it allowed them to "increase shareholder value".

What are you talking about? The main thrust of complaints about self-driving cars is that they block traffic because they stop when they're not sure what to do. It's literally the opposite of the problem you're describing. You're just making things up and then saying complete nonsense like this.

We should decide whether self-driving cars are legal based on whether or not they make the world safer. That's my stance. Yours seems to be unserious, incoherent nonsense.
I tried using aider to work with GPT-4 on this problem. Initially it went for a solution based on `shift`. But when challenged, it realized that shift was O(n) and was able to come up with a dual stack solution. It considers this solution O(1) when amortized over many operations. I don't know ruby well, so I can't verify that.

https://aider.chat/share/?mdurl=https://gist.github.com/paul...
> Were train commutes really that boring before the smartphone came about?

Yes. You had to buy a physical newspaper/magazine, which was simultaneously more expensive and less interesting.
They have a YouTube channel and I hope they publish all of the talks after the fact. Should anyone from the conference read this it would be great if paid corporate packages were offered that made the recorded sessions available for download.

https://www.youtube.com/@packagingcon9302
Could you tell approximate time in wait list?

BTW, I could write code, so your page "You're on the waiting list!" will show approximate time.

I could understand, if you don't want to show number of people in wait list, but simple algorithm could forecast and show approx days to wait.

Thank you!
Shouldn't the functions of "development" and "QA" both reside under the umbrella of the chip-maker though?

In fact, chip-makers famously invest an insane amount of money into "QA" (aka "validation") and many features or lack thereof are often put down to the cost of QA rather than the cost of development.
The chipmakers don't have an incentive to look too hard for speculation security issues beyond a bit of PR. If they succeed, they lose money and marketshare, while their 'insecure' opponents gain and at most patches later. And in fairness, a lot of these bugs are rather theoretical. Until buyers take these bugs much more seriously, this isn't going to change.
Congress had the right idea when they made ERISA pension liabilities joint liabilities among controlled companies. Of course, that’s probably one of the factors that contributed to the decline of private sector pensions, but I think some new joint liability laws would be a great idea.
You can get a Mi Band for about that price, and it's a good smartwatch with great battery life (admittedly the software isn't the best).
I don't think anyone cares about what candaians who think they are Americans believe simply because they live nearby.

As subjects of the King, canadians have no understanding of liberty, nor the founding principles of the American nation. They fled as soon as people suggested defiance. Subjugation is in the veins of canadians.
Good point! I didn't realize this. In Romania where I'm from, cash on delivery is very common. But the scheme couldn't work with credit cards. Very few people encrypt email, and undoubtedly they would send sensitive data.
Believe it or not, hate crimes do exist in Germany. Maybe not as a legal term, but that's a legal thing and a political decision. You cannot forbid the term to be applied single handedly. And if a political decision was made to not count something, it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

However, based on your cliché populist statement of distrusting any media because it's biased, I don't see a point in continuing.
I wonder how much of post-party depression is caused by isolation.

In the past, new mothers were surrounded by a whole village of women who would help care for the woman and the baby.

Many times now, women are isolated with maybe the father present. And even then there are pressures to get back to work.

This isn’t to discount or minimize postpartum depression, but if we as a society set up people for failure which require them to take a pill to get better, maybe something needs to be rethought.
Good to know, thanks! I haven't tried doing either of those.
So when it's open, you sail through it. When it's solid, you drive over it. They just need to build a couple of ports on either coast. It's a good thing we have an abundance of truck drivers...ooops.
1. This is possibly an artifact of parity being easy to detect in base 10. I have less confidence that if you asked GPT to figure this out in trinary it would get it right. For a short trinary number it worked once (via chain-of-thought converting trinary to decimal) and then I got this result for a longer number which is trivially wrong:

"...The given number ends with a 2. In trinary, the only possible remainders when divided by 2 (in trinary) are 0, 1, and 2. Since the last digit is 2, the number
12101100102112_3
3 mod 2 (in trinary) is simply 2."

and to double-check that wasn't a fluke another run of the same prompt produced:

"To determine
12101100102112 mod 2 in trinary (base-3), we have to look at the least significant digit (the rightmost digit). The reason for this is that in base-10, a number mod 10 is simply its units digit, and similarly, in base-2 (binary), a number mod 2 is its least significant bit. The principle carries over to other bases."

This is an example of a reasoning error. If you want to generate a distribution of more answers my exact prompt was:

"What is 12101100102112 mod 2 in trinary?"

I'm getting an error using the plugins version (Authorization error accessing plugins), so this was GPT4-default.

2. Agreed, it was hard and took me a while to accurately count tildes in the prompt to be sure I wasn't making mistakes. I fell back to some kind of human chain-of-thought process by proceeding by discrete steps of 5-counts since I can't sight-count 27. I could have also used production rules from logic to eliminate two negations at a time. Any of these strategies are accessible to GPT-4 in chain-of-thought token-space but aren't used.
That depends: if you are at the edge of your range then the Enviolo may well cause you to have to pedal the hard way with a bike that feels as though you're going uphill all the time. I only see one positive about the Enviolo and that's that you can change to low gear at a traffic light even when you're stopped.
I don't understand yet what Bindle is trying to do. It seems to be half archive format, half package manager, yet not innovating in either area nor adding anything by their combination. Additionally, it explicitly doesn't support 'latest' tags or branches, which exist in package ecosystems for a reason.