skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I interned under the scientists that did the original Brookhaven Muon g-2 experiments. I learned a ton during multiple months from them and it was so interesting to learn why this measurement is so important. One of the sad parts is that a decade later, a lot of the original team has either retired or left Federal labs because the environment has become toxic due to a mixture of politics and greener pastures beyond national labs and academia. It’s quite sad to see the US science community degrade over this past decade.
Yeah, it talks about some Notch guy. Apparently he's a dude who claimed to create Minecraft? What an impostor; everybody knows that Minecraft was created by Jens Bergensten with Microsoft's backing — he's the very first guy in Minecraft's credit, and there is no "Notch" there anywhere!
Yeah this is like those heartstring tugging “facts” that sum up food waste and compare it to a hunger statistic, as if it could all just get scrapped together and handed over in consumable condition to a group that also happens to be perfectly organized and located for mass distribution to.
Quake II soundtrack is still in some sort of copyright limbo. It's easy enough to find on Youtube, but it's not on streaming services as far as I know.

EDIT: maybe it's getting sorted out, there's even a fricking vinyl release

https://www.lacedrecords.com/products/quake-2-limited-editio...
Please remember that USB storage needs to be recharged every so often, or the data will be lost.
https://archive.li/HTh66
I resonate with your comment!

Someone has to pay for the servers and put food on the table... right? :P

I won't let profit take precedence over the mission that we started out with: to help people suffering from loneliness. It is personal to me since I have been through it, and I will keep iterating to make this platform the most useful to the people it serves.
No x509 certificates involved?

In countries with legally binding digital signatures (I.e. Argentina) you need a cert issued following identity verification.
;# is the Choice column separator value. That restriction makes sense in that context.
Unless I'm working in an academic project I couldn't care less about elegancy.

Speed (and ergo costs) trumps elegancy in industrial settings imho, specially considering how expensive to run LLMs are. Such an OSS dependency can be improved or at least "wrapped" to isolate it from the rest of your codebase.
Programmers doesn't define requirements, the task define the requirements

If you need to target very tiny boards, none from that list are suitable C replacements, _maybe_ zig and D with betterC since they both provide an inline assembler

Otherwise we'll end up with companies using Raspberry Pi 4 for their fleet of scooters because "i can run nodejs on it" (hyperbole, but you get the idea) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37016842
Discovering the drop down console was a revelation.

An homage: http://guake-project.org/
I've just checked and there's some mobos for $60 with ECC. Is that for real? Supermicro costs like $1000, half that for refurbished.
Surely doubling the households would only half the cost or the duration available, not both?
energy bill might go up, but the heating bill goes down ...
There's a Hummer bike: https://www.reconpowerbikes.com/product/hummer-ev-awd-e-bike...
Define "working"

Yes there are LLMs useful for such things and you could use them to make moderation decisions. YMMV with how "good" you want your moderation to be.
Most TF providers are not maintained by Hashicorp, but by the company whose product the provider integrates into. Development of the provider is an investment the company makes to lower CAC.
It's ironically happening because if you make open source and you use a liberal license you will be taken for a ride by competitors using your code to compete with you.
I saw grumbling elsewhere about how the re-release doesn't include a Linux version, but here they are with the source and it claims to be tested with clang. Big props to iD for sticking to their principles.
> why not just move the guns so they do not shoot through the props?

Some did do just that.

With the British Foster mounting[0] variants of the S.E.5a, Sopwith Camel and Nieuport fighters mounted their guns over-wing and above the arc of the propeller. Convergence issues still apply here, as noted by the other comments.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foster_mounting
If you make a bicycle look anything like a Humvee (what the Hummer is styled to be like) then you no longer have a bicycle.
> From the screenshots, I think it is only a fake wet signature. I'm not sure how valid that is.

This seems perfectly acceptable in my jurisdiction. Then again, Kentucky is pretty laid back. By statute, an electronic signature is just a mark made electronically that is intended by the signer to be a signature. That's about it. Same as if I were to sign by hand, but electronic.

Call me naive, but these laws that make electronic signatures some complicated thing seem messy to me. It's a signature. If you want to verify ID, then do that, but don't conflate the two.
In my endless files, I just found the binary of my mod.

https://xn0.co/Xeno-Mod_1.9_Setup.exe

Because I'm sure everyone on HN just downloads execs from a random internet source and runs them!

But if you have the OG QII, are curious, it is safe to run.
A crow on the level of Archimedes [video]
I find it curious that Microsoft doesnt get more shit for demanding a CLA, especially given that embrace, extend, extinguish is in their DNA.
I wish I could give you more upvotes.

I'd also much rather have "open source" with commercialization restrictions than closed source.

It's still in most people's best interest to contribute to these projects if they were before, or would have before. Many businesses(and this is where most of the contributions get funded from, let's be real) rely on these projects and have no intention of selling them or competing with HashiCorp services.
This is wrong when it comes to content stored in SharePoint, of which resides in content databases or a remote blob storage, but the file names are in guid format, not the source file name, which wouldn’t work for a file of any name and SharePoint due to shredding.
Without looking at the listing I can't earnestly say what you're seeing isn't fake but I know back when I had the same question you're asking here I saw similar offerings. Ultimately I bought a used ITX supermicro mobo+CPU combo unit from eBay for like $200
Pretty much this. I wanted to learn about networking and server management that I no longer get to do as part of my day job.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment! I think it is a good idea to include helpful resources within the app so that supporters can support better and lonely people can decide the appropriate help they need depending on the severity of it.

We will refer to some mental experts for this part. Thanks again!
They seem to refer to different domains. Supersonic is about the speed of sound, and ultrasonic is about the frequency. Superior is about being higher / better, and ulterior is about being a next step :)
If this doesn't move the needle expect more increases to their licensing. Though I don't know how it could become more expensive.
> Which explains why in dense modern society we couldn’t find a difference that the appendix makes, because we get reinfected with healthy microbiome from sharing germs with all the other humans in our big cities - some of whom didn’t just get a terrible stomach bug at the same time as us.

Do you have any citations for that? Perhaps it differs by city and region, but many modern cities with good sanitation systems are exceptionally clean - you're not getting frequently reinfected by others' gut flora unless there is a catastrophic problem with the sewer system. People with things like C. difficile infection can have chronic disease for years, and fecal transplants have only recently been recognized as a good treatment in those cases - point being you have to have an actual fecal transplant, you're not just going to "get reinfected with healthy microbiome from sharing germs with all the other humans".
Likely no, but a kid isn't going to be learning low level systems programming in highschool. Their entry point into the world is programming is going to be high-level, as that has less barrier to entry.

My point is that kids in the 80s interested in computers likely had the skillset to do this job. Kids interested in programming today, they are more likely to be qualified to make the school a website, not program its heating system. I don't doubt some would be able to do it, but the field has grown so much that beginners necessarily must focus on specific areas, and I bet that is not often low level enough to do this job.
It's not so much quid-pro-quo as freedom. I like creating open source to give users freedom, not to contribute to billion dollar companies jailing everyone's data in SaaS and creating a surveillance dystopia.
I only needed the captcha to archive new pages and not already archived ones.
I've had jobs where we used a containerized dev evironment like this. I've had others where we just installed all the dependencies to our dev machines. The container environment is hands down the worse experience of the two. Similar to this tutorial, if you don't want to use the blessed editor, you end up maintaining your own docker container. Similarly if you want to use tools not installed into the official container (say, ripgrep).

I'll take updating a dependency on my dev machine every now and then (which could be largely eliminated if we had used something like conan) over maintaining my own docker image any day. You can also largely eliminate relying on system headers through --sysroot, which cmake supports.

Another issue we had, which this tutorial doesn't appear to address, is that these containers run as root, so files created in them on a mounted folder easily end up as owned by root. Which can create all sorts of mayhem. The only reliable solution I have seen is to dynamically change the container users uid and gid on login, but this often doesn't seem to get implemented.
That would be more like 30 years since C was truly trendy, and maybe 20 in some areas like embedded software engineering and games development. C was the top of the pile for decades, and I think when you compare it strictly to other languages that were available during that time it becomes clear why (not that is necessarily better than those other languages, but why it was so terrifically popular).
It's a metaphorical eternity, not a literal eternity. Four years ago is 2019; I use plenty of software from then.

And if I understand the license correctly, you're perfectly free to use the software in your own open-source projects, and your commercial projects unless they're a re-packaging of Hashicorp's own, etc. We shouldn't act like this is an evil business decision, or like this is morally equivalent to proprietary software that does stay proprietary forever with no apology or caveats.
Disabled I can readily see and I would be surprised if exemptions weren't granted in some form. "Unusual" I'm far less sympathetic towards if it involves simply not getting into the water as a matter of principle or preference.
Looks like they've got dual-wan (at&t fiber + verizon 5G backup). It's pretty easy to do ipv4 failover with NAT as long as you've got an indication that it needs doing; ipv6 failover is a lot harder; unless you're going to NAT the v6 traffic too. I don't know about Apple devices, but I couldn't get Android or Windows to play nice with two v6 ranges in radvd. They wouldn't listen to priority, and they would do derpy things like pick an address from one router's advertisement and then send the traffic to the other router.

In some magic happy land where you can use your IPv6 prefix over both WANs, then yeah, things can work, but that doesn't work for residences, generally.
This is my point. A "music label" with zero money and zero strategy for marketing as the above seems to indicate won't be successful. The technology behind it isn't as important as the money needed to market it.
I get that, but even figuratively, it's a relatively harmless opinion that can only achieve as much by way of influence or control as readers are willing to allow the anonymous commenter to hold over them. There's more to learn if we confront the opinion by its premises (as shown by other responses to the comment) than by subjective moral grounds.
Why not advocate for better testing? What was preventing you from spending more time unit testing code running a billion dollar business?
Most of the time it's the IT Infrastructure, Operations, Security guys that love to do this for (WHY) learning, testing and as a hobby. Check out r/homelab and r/selfhosted for more on this.
Those could (partially) be downstream effects of Portnoy's actions. I know I associate them with the brand.
And what exactly does OP have over and above the artist marketing themselves and keeping 100% of the money?
They've been running streaming at a loss to get market share, but now they're all freaking out about the losses and trying to make it so they make just as much from streaming as they did before when you had to bundle everything and they locked most of the content in a vault to divvy out when they felt like remarketing it to make more money. Things are going to keep getting worse because making less money overall is not allowed, neither is making the same amount of money. Only more money.
While heat provides the energy for hurricanes, crap in the air prevents the convection required for storms to develop and organize. The Saharan Dust Layer has been brutal this year, blowing massive amounts of dust across the Atlantic and the Gulf up into Texas, where it’s produced significantly reduced visibility and rainfall. See it here: https://www.myfoxhurricane.com/saharan_dust_car.html
No. I just started a mega project in my company in C11 3 months ago and we already have insane velocity with zero problems. I intend to start many more in C in coming months. Sorry.
Sounds like they’re removing unsuccessful white labels. I haven’t heard of most of these brands.

Basics and Essentials will still be there.
"Chestnuts roasting on an open server rack"
Maybe they do and maybe they don't, but I am certainly expected to deal with whatever the results might be if I paste something into a terminal.

I know there exist terminals and shells that do try to be "helpful" and do auto-escape pastes, but that just breaks things that must not be modified, when the only reason you're pasting is because you need it to be an exact copy without any risk of human typos.

Some are less invasive and just warn when there are included \n before proceeding, but do not presume to munge the data.
The issue I'm talking about is allowing clients to make arbitrary queries via GQL. Maybe I've misunderstood it, but that's how I've seen it used before. If clients can do that, then they need to know about the model. And if they can't then I'm not sure what GQL does that REST doesn't do.
[Joe, Pulumi Founder here.]

Said well (and thank you for being a customer and valuable member of our community!)

The analogy I draw sometimes is that our open source infrastructure as code SDK ("Pulumi") is like Git, and our commercial offering ("Pulumi Cloud") is like GitHub.

Like GitHub, the Pulumi Cloud offers valuable features that go beyond the open source project for teams looking to manage lots of projects securely at scale, but we definitely love our open source community and want folks to have the choice to use Pulumi however makes the most sense for them.

This approach also has the nice consequence that we can be fully transparent with our community at all times while also building a strong, long-term business. If a new feature is part of the infrastructure as code SDK, it's open source and free; if it's part of the Pulumi Cloud SaaS, it's part of our commercial offering. This avoids needing to do things like artificially hold back features (like open core) or violating our commitment to the open source community (like Hashi's new license).
>Insofar as this is a satire of how people keep rewriting stuff in Rust for little to no reason, I heh'd

It's not, AFAICT, satire. At least it doesn't seem that way based on their discussion[0] about porting decade-plus old code to Rust.

But even so, it's still amusing. Buttplugs! heh! :)

[0] https://github.com/buttplugio/buttplug-csharp#readme
It will be fun to do a search on the next release of Terraform for code which I have written while not under contract with HashiCorp (I am still the #8 all time contributor according to GitHub, despite not having worked on it since ~2017-8, when non-employed maintainers were summarily removed from projects by a middle manager).

I have not and will not sign anything which assigns copyright for OSS (even to the FSF), so it will be interesting to see whether all of that code has been rewritten.
BSL Conditions:

You may make production use of the Licensed Work, provided such use does not include offering the Licensed Work to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis which is competitive with HashiCorp's products.
> Tactically switching industries midway through my career led me to significantly higher comp longer term (several multiples).

Out of curiosity, which industry did you switch from (and to)?
Its a disparagement at the fact they're dated, rather than the software itself.

GCC searches by default in /usr/include and friends, (and a similar set of paths for library paths), meaning that one random library you downloaded 11 years ago is now perpetually on your search path.
What does your mod do?
>but because they don't have the credit score for anything within city limits

That's because there's not enough housing in the city limits.

>Space and access to sunlight are also components of quality of life and you have neither in very dense housing.

That's not true, adding a few more sky scrapers increases the amount of space for people and does not impact the amount of sunlight people can enjoy.

Cities can also do things like add more rail lines, so people can commute from further away -- which also increases the amount of space for people.
Note that Safari deprecated "unload" a long time ago: https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Ap...
> where these companies would be if their software was under non free license from the start.

Yep open source is used as a marketing. I doubt they'd gain much adoption if it started with BSL at first place.
In fairness, there are also a lot of frankly bad platforms and all encompassing frameworks.
I write a decent amount of go, and it's not wildly useful there either but I still use them as the rest of the tooling is good enough that it works for me.
> I'm a big containers fan, they work really well (assuming you're not developing with MSVC). They give you a repeatable build environment, which is a boon for something like C where you're implicitly depending on system include paths for versioning.

For development, I actually don't like "repeatable build environments". I like using a different, continuously updated systems, I consider having a different environment for CI/CD and for development to be a good thing. It is one of the best way to test for compatibility problems, a kind of dogfooding.

Plus, it is nice working on a system you are comfortable with, and without the performance penalties of virtualization/containerization.

For releasing and testing however, containers are great.
uBlock Origin is my extension of choice for this. It makes it really easy to block those distractions, and there are quite a few pre-existing filters to choose from.
> it's hard to tell how much $ is due to the switch and how much due to our table and query design.

Sounds like good material for a technical blog post.
As a starting point it’s a great line; rather than closed source have something that worst case you can use in four years.

As a restriction added to something previously open, it’s horrendous. AGPL would be better.
I think “industry leaders” in most cases are more or less interchangeable with many of their peers, they just had similar skill/expertise while also enjoying a significant level of basic good fortune. They also tend to have far less influence than they’d like to admit. They are subject to the same circumstances and trends as anyone, and true iconoclasts who can boast success are vanishingly rare.
US Supreme Court needs more scrutiny, not less
Why we created Hacker News (2007)
That's what I figured- I've never actually tested it though because I don't have any spare drives sitting around anymore.

One of these days though I'll get around to zeroing out a drive and then running Autopsy on it for shiggles just to see what comes back up. Should be a fun experience!
Fiduciary responsibility isn't entirely about returns, it's about the best interests of the investors. And if you've invested in a company with a certain mission it would be said to be in your interests for that mission to continue.

If I were starting a business these days I'd be tempted to found it on the basis that 60% must be owned by employees of the company until the last living descendant of king Charles dies.
> That's pretty disappointing.

From the article: “End users can continue to copy, modify, and redistribute the code for all non-commercial and commercial use, except where providing a competitive offering to HashiCorp.”

Literally nothing has changed, this isn’t disappointing, it’s smart, they’re protecting themselves against cloud providers that have repeatedly abused the goodwill of the open source community.
Bryan Cantrill had an insightful talk "Corporate Open Source Anti-Patterns" surrounding events from 8-12 years ago, and all I'll say is history definitely echoes sometimes: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Pm8P4oCIY3g
My strong impression is that in the last two years there a couple change were rolled out to search that sent it straight into the sewer - search seemed to be tweaked to crassly, crudely put any product name above anything else in the searches. But since then, it seems like quality has crept back up again. Simple product terms still get top billing but more complicated searches aren't nerfed.

So it seems the search quality team exists but gets locked on in the closet by advertising periodically.

I know you can't verify anything directly but maybe we could set a system of code for you to communicate what's really happening...
The lever was pushed by a cam on the propeller shaft.
Today your TV reaches the Internet through a router that you (should) control. If the TV connects directly to a cellular network you can't insert a firewall.
That's my point. Just because things are "from the environment" doesn't mean they aren't toxic or pollutants.
So it covers basically all use cases in the USA and most private commercial use cases in the EU. Seems reasonably useful for many people.

Most countries that accept eSignatures don't require digital certificates. There aren't many other countries as strict as Argentina. See for ex https://www.hellosign.com/blog/electronic-signature-laws-aro...
This made me tear up a little bit :') Thank you for your kind words!

I think you really get the intent of our app. We think there is a big chunk of humanity missing from all the app offerings out there that unfortunately tend to amplify misinterpretation and distrust all for the sake of eyeballs on screen.

And I also agree with your sentiment that this might not take off. I think apps with sexual and stimulating aspects that give instant dopamine hit would have a better chance of going viral, to be honest. But, in the world of fast-food apps, we want to create a whole-some app that people can get spiritual nourishment from. It might take a while, but we believe it is the right and the good thing for humanity :)
Mathematically rigorous definition of "median center of population":

https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/cenpop2020/COP202...
"She's dead, Jim." No kill like overkill!