skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
SCOTLAND VS ITALY LIVE SIX NATIONS RUGBY MARCH 17, 2012
Enjoy Six Nations Rugby match Between Scotland vs Italy match . Please do not miss the today’s great match between Scotland vs Italy. I hope you will get so much fun by watching this very exciting match between Scotland vs Italy live Six Nations Rugby 2012 online streaming. Watch Six Nations Rugby Italy vs Scotland live online on 17th march 2012 . Italy vs Scotland match is the very exciting Match of the Rugby 2012 which will be kick off at March 2012.

Scotland vs Italy live Six Nations Rugby on online

The Six Nations Championship is an annual international rugby union competition involving six European sides: England, France, Ireland, Italy, Scotland and Wales. The Six Nations Championship is the successor to the Five Nations and the Home Nations Championship, which was the first international rugby union tournament in the Northern Hemisphere. The event is currently sponsored by the Royal Bank of Scotland. The winners of the Six Nations Championship are also known as the European Champions.

Scotland vs Italy live Six Nations Rugby (Click Here)

Scotland vs Italy
Date : March 17, 2012
Time: 13:30 (local), 12:30 (GMT)
Played at Olimpico Stadium, Rome
Six Nations Rugby 2012
Flights to Sydney from London
Cheap flights from London UK to Sydney: get low cost cheapest flights from London to Sydney via all points. Here last minute cheap airline tickets deal to Sydney flights from UK are available. We Have direct and return special flights to Sydney from London search online LON to SWZ flights by dearflight.co.uk also Compare by call us now 0203 189 0988.
He also mentioned on his podcast that he's been thinking about fonts for a long time, but licensing models for apps are complicated. Forget the details, but I think Readability may have caused him to revisit the issue and find it's now feasible with some negotiation.
I have one US, Japanese, Swedish and UK account. Buying music legally has never been harder, especially since I have to have credit cards that are registered in those countries too.
> On Classfy right now you can add your forum username and the url to your profile. There is no way to authenticate the user but if many members from a forum join and list with classfy. We will arrange something with the owner of the forum to authenticate the users.

Pretend that I'm arn, running MacRumors. Why should I switch to your service?

My own "Marketplace" forum is working well. People who sell a lot on there have a reputation for not ripping others off. For those that are new, it's either caveat emptor or going through PayPal when something bad happens.

There's also Heatware already. It allows you to leave feedback for forum transactions. Your account is linked to all your forum accounts, so if you're new to one forum, but established in another, you have references. Here's my feedback page, for example:

http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?show=to&id=69703&nu...

They have around 70K registered users right now. If you want to displace them, it's going to be difficult (especially because people have momentum on Heatware already: they don't want to lose all their feedback to move to another system).
Oh wow. Thanks!
It probably does it to grab your name for new file templates
The information was public already before google scraped it.
But everything in google's search-index is public?
Some of the tests they link prove the opposite of what they say in the slides. Also, saying that eval is not evil is evil.
Shutting down a product? Sell it.
If you have a MVP that's making $50 - $100 a month, but don't have the heart to work on it anymore, don't let it die!

Sell it!

I want to buy a (very) small old fashioned desktop app or SASS app that I can take over and try and grow.

If you have anything sitting on your back burner and want to get rid of it, let me know!
"InstaPaper App" updated to Support New iPad Retina Display
Thanks for the link xatax... that's definitely easier for sure.

It's just a shame that the Dirty Deeds movie that the site is linking to on IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes is another movie with the same name, that's apparently nowhere near as good as the actual one that is 'now available'. Well, I thought it was pretty good at least :)
a real confusing point for quite of us developers.
Content is the main aspect of any website. Then design is the next step.
Resume not that important. Your site should contain an about page highlighting a little about you and what you do. If people like what they see then they will soon get in touch regarding resume etc.
Make sure your site has a php contact form rather than displaying your email address directly. The spam that you get from displaying email address directly soon builds up and is very annoying.

When coming up with design for your site there are a few things to take into account.

Make sure the design looks good on all browsers. What i mean by this is that many people still use older browsers that do not support all the latest CSS tricks. Your design should look good on these older browsers as a start then tweak it to look even better on new browsers. That way any visitors regardless of browser should have a pleasant experience on your site.

Last thing I will add is.....

Look at other sites similar to what you want to achieve. Don't copy them but see what you like about these sites. Layout, design, features etc and see how you can design, customise and implement similar aspects to suit your needs.

Don't forget that over everything else the "content" is the main aspect of any good site
电脑包品牌
Show HN: compare your reading
> EMC must have sold them on something more than just a huge pile of money.

Never underestimate the power of huge pile of money. Even for the filthy rich.
Google allows for multiple logins. I have one pro gmail account and one personal, and I'm signed on in both at the same time, all day. From time to time I get logged off of one or another, but it works quite well overall.
Any feedback, criticism (positive or negative) would be greatly appreciated. Feel free to ask me any questions regarding how I did it.
I think you need to read what I wrote again.

There are several types of discrimination - race, sex, sexual preference, age, ability, and religion.

My point was to compare one type of discrimination -discrimination against those with a disability, a mental illness - with other types of discrimination, either discrimination against those with a different disability - those who use wheelchairs, or discrimination against people of a different ethnicity.

Why is it acceptable to say "This person has a mental illness and thus all of their work is suspect and all of the work of their organisation is suspect"?

Why is that acceptable if it's not acceptable to say "This person is a wheelchair user and thus all of their work is suspect and all of the work of their organisation is suspect" or "This person is gay and thus all of their work is suspect and all of the work of their organisation is suspect"?
Good point. How disappointing!
Molnar's point about the political and procedural difficulties of adding new applications in the official repositories of most distributions is true (although this is changing -- witness Canonical's Ubuntu Software Center, PPAs, and "universe" repositories).

But his reasoning breaks down when he says the relative dearth of commercial applications for the Linux Desktop is due to this issue. That's not true.

The main reason why OSX/iOS, Android, and Windows attract more commercial developers is because those platforms have a much greater installed base!
This is basically why Ubuntu has PPAs and what they are trying to turn Software Center into right?
I have none. I have no itunes account, and no appstore account. That means that I can't use any of these apps and that's exactly how I want it to do.
iTunes stopped being vaguely usable around OS X 10.4, FWIW. The AppStore may be nice enough to use, but is probably not worth the deal for me; Apple has no business knowing anything about me.
As I don't like what's coming with OS X anyway, sooner or later I'll jump ships for good.
Nashville golf lessons
It probably depends on your sound card, and whether it can record from more than one source at a time. Many older sound cards only had a single stereo input, but it's not uncommon for newish motherboard-integrated HD Audio chipsets to support recording from multiple sources.

If you (still) use an emu10kn-based card (such as the SB Live), the kX project drivers allow custom routing, mixing, and alteration of inputs and outputs via the card's built-in DSP chip.
Bankruptcy attorney nashville
It really frustrates me that authors are not responsible for compiling and distributing their software, only then will we have software upgraded regularly and quickly.
Your own good taste may be holding back your creativity — here’s why
Ultracold Experiments Heat Up Quantum Research
I'm just an ordinary user, but I'd put my 2¢.

Nowadays, any developer can create a packages for his application (and any of its dependencies) and publish it in self-hosted repositories. Users can easily add such repository to their system's sources list and bureaucracy problem's over. Well, some developers are doing this already - the only thing that keeps the rest of them is either ignorance or complexity of the packaging process.

I believe there's no need for an Android market clone (which is yet another centralized repository). What users may need is just a directory, pointing to external repos. Ubuntu market seems somehow promising (at least I remember seeing some dialogs like "you need to enable this source to install that package").

Content duplication is not a problem. A real problem is keeping the system up-to-date when you want to update some library, because of an important feature or bugfix. And it's nearly impossible with every application's bundling their own copy of that library, with some copies being actually incompatible forks (and a lot of copies being just different builds - think of different compiler versions - of exactly the same sources).
JavaScript charts using PHP
which distribution should they compile and distribute (sigh) for? Not to mention basic problems like "should I integrate with GNOME, Unity, KDE or nothing at all?"
Marco said everything that needed to be said. Meaney should have kept smugly quiet.

"I wish someone had kicked my complacent ass about fonts sooner."
Seo services
Seo services in best rpice for detail mail us
Seo services in best price for other detail contact us through mail
I believe proper packaging is quite complex process, so it scares a lot of the developers away.
My impression is that the problem is more fundamental: a lot of open source and free software which finds its way onto linux is made by people who don't seem to care about the end-user experience. If it works for them, there is no need to improve it.

Not all open software projects are receptive to changes, improvements or bug reports from strangers so nothing is really resolved without forking by which adds its own complications.

Of course there is still good open source / free software. It's just hard to come by.
Reiseplanung
Worldcheckin is a Travel planner will provide best deals for you. We also provide the cheapest hotel rate for your required hotel budget and cheapest car rentals for you. To know more about find cheapest flight visit online.
URDU SEX STORIES: Moqa Daikh Kar Bhabhi Ko Chod Dya
What an incredible week this has been
I was pleasantly surprised this worked fine on my 3DS. No "script execution taking too long", no "page content too large".

It's nice that not everything requires jQuery these days.
I am running on linux desktop for already 5 years together with 50 friends, peers etc. It does not quite seem write to compare 90 cent mobile applications, which are 'mostly' few bunch of screens interfaced to a service otherwise given by a web site or simple 80s area arcade games, to packages in a linux distro. the author is totally making a terrible mistake here. mobile apps lack in size, complexity and who said they are great? they are mostly consumables which perish in few days or months (I exclude some ).

Ubuntu is already trying to be more flexible with software center and applications, however open source is not single walled garden which can adhere to tight monotonous architectures found in mobile.

In an linux distro the apps are diverse, and programmed in multitude ways by all possible programming languages (from python to lisp to C) and environments. That is reality and life, and what must be done must be done by being aware of that fact. and No, no one can force the broad, diverse open source world to a tight control a la Apple.
CodecriticonArgumentos variables en un método
My eval tests said the same. I'm not sure if thats indicative of a host-specific performance problem or if it is with eval itself.

Perhaps the problem I have is with this statement:

> "Eval is evil", or in other words, Eval is too slow and quirky to be considered useful.

That's misleading. While performance of eval is perhaps getting better, eval is still evil for a number of reasons that aren't related to performance at all.
I have two: my ITMS account - which is also used for iCloud/AppStore etc. - and my ADC account. Not sure what else is needed, because from 7 years of being an OS X user nothing else has sprung up.
I was. I'm Irish and I live in Dublin, that might change the perspective of my comment. Apologies for the ambiguity
The app store uses your ITMS account. They are one and the same stores.
There are only 2 popular package formats: deb and rpm.

I don't have any experience with RPM, but to build a package for a reasonably big part of the Debian-based world, you have to set up a build system (pbuilder/cowbuilder) and tell it something like `for DIST in lenny squeeze wheezy sid lucid maverick natty oneiric pangolin do; git-buildpackage ...; done`

The problem is, to get it right one has to find and read TONS of documentation.
I disagree. The main problem is that the Linux desktop doesn't (yet?) have a large, fast-growing installed base, so mass commercial developers don't target it!
I think you need the talk to be able to understand what they meant.

Because I for one haven't heard any rumors that forEach is faster than a for loop for example, and a lot of the other stuff.

There is also a lot of things that are true in certain browsers but not others, if you want the fastest possible performance you probably need to optimize per engine. (But that is overkill for most Javascript applications)
Assange to run for Australian Senate
Any chance of getting these in a plain old list? Kinda painful to read when it's not a presentation.
"""
The main reason why OSX/iOS, Android, and Windows attract more commercial developers is because those platforms have a much greater installed base!
"""

... and therefore enables developers to make more money!

In my opinion it is one of the most important factors right here, combined together with a lot of marketing from companies which own the "platform".
Nano-scale art, smaller than grain of sand (Kickstarter project)
There's something wrong in a marriage if you can't maintain a hobby unless it makes a profit.
鼻出血
The importance of zero
NRI | NRI latest news | NRI updated news | NRI tamil news
Jailbreak Wii software
> Some of the tests they link prove the opposite of what they say in the slides.

The content can't be seen without signing in and it would appear that I've forgotten the password for my fake-details account, so I can't look at the code specifically.

But I can say that it is not unexpected that the results one person gets can diverge significantly when someone else tries the same test. A lot of code rearrangements that are intended to speed up Javascript execution are optimised for a particular browser (or, if people are being more thorough, a particular subset of browsers). What is optimal for Firefox's engine is not necessarily so for Chrome's, and performance metrics can vary significantly between different versions of the same browser as changes are made to optimisations within the code interpreter/compiler over time. Heck, even exactly the same version of Firefox may behave differently performance-wise on Linux than Windows.

You can never say that a given "trick" is an optimisation generally because there are many variables. Unless of course what you are actually doing is optimising your logic rather than rearranging it (i.e. changing from something that is akin to a linear search to something that has a logarithmic growth pattern) but that isn't optimising Javascript, it is optimising the algorithm you've implemented using the language.

> Also, saying that eval is not evil is evil.

There are very specific circumstances when eval() can be used with relative safety [i.e. when the only injection method is by direct code manipulation, and all client-side Javascript is susceptible to that with or without eval()]. Other than that I agree, and none of the cases where eval() is safe that spring to mind can't be implemented some other way (at least in modern browsers).
> Anyone who has ever programmed on a GUI of any sort

Most Python folks are backend folks. As mentioned, I frequently see Python folk (including myself a few years ago) confusing async code for JS being a complex language.

> anybody else will rapidly learn.

Why?

Delphi and the other desktop app RAD tools took care of callback integration - the entry point for the code was generally not shown, it was just visually attached to the button.
(I'm the author)

An initial version of SmoothieCharts used SVG, but I switched to Canvas because I got slightly better performance (which actually surprised me).

That's not strictly true - for very large charts, the SVG ones performed better, but I optimized for the common case.

Recently I've been experimenting with a WebGL version - it gives MUCH better performance than both Canvas (2D) and SVG, but only works on the most recent browsers.
It's Official - Apple Is Now Bigger Than The Entire US Retail Sector
I fail to see how you not wanting to use iTunes has any relevance to the problem of joining up multiple accounts.
The author is right mostly, the problem is friction and market dynamics. Adding software in a given linux distro is too nerdy. If you don't have an "app store" like gui, you've already lost most users. Command line = friction for most users, even a lot of developers who grew up with windows.

As a linux nerd, I'm fine with command line + synaptic, but look at how well people have used the iTunes store, Amazon store, Google Play, etc... All of those have much less friction to find and download the right software than most linux distro's have. Ubuntu's market is close but...

WHERE IS THE NON FREE SOFTWARE?!!

If linux wants to do well for humans, paid, proprietary software NEEDS to exist on the platform. Ubuntu Software Center comes close, but it still kind of sucks.

Also, as a dev, it wasn't until VERY recently that you could even sign up to publish an app that was commercial in nature. It is hard to build a real marketplace when you're asking developers to give away all their work for free so that you can sell more operating systems (or support contracts) without the software dev seeing a dime.

As a software developer I can't feed my kids with free downloads on an open source operating system used by people who don't like paying for software.

Make it easy for devs to build software that people will pay for, then get operating system users who will buy that software for real money and you'll have fixed the Linux Desktop problem.
How does the "large eye to see large objects" thesis make any sense at all? I can see the moon just fine with my puny little orbs. I get that the large eye will have an extremely narrow "depth of field" for small objects, but how does that mean it will see larger ones any better?

It seems a whole lot more likely to me that it's "large eye to catch more photons because it's _DARK_ down there".

EDIT: maybe something to do with the fact that the light that is down there falls off quickly so a larger aperture somehow lets you correlate the scattered light better?
I would also add to what sdoering said in their post. Make sure that your content is something you're comfortable and passionate about. This comes through at some level to your site visitors.
If you are blogging then it is usually best to keep this blog within a certain field.
Look at what blogs you regularly read. What is it about those blogs that keeps you going back for more.
Don't go chasing readers or potential employers. If your content is good, relevant and informative in a certain field then word soon spreads and your users will come back for more.
Im not saying that sticking to a certain field is the only way forward as we all have opinions about most subjects that crop up in our daily lives but usually it is good practice for gaining regular visitors to your blog.
A narrow subject field helps to target a certain type of visitor thus encouraging the right type of target audience. e.g potential employers.
After all is said and done the best thing to do is just get it down on paper and go for it. Your ideas, design, writing style, readers/visitors will evolve as time goes by.
TV^Italy v Scotland/watch Italy v Scotland| Care2 Share
I disagree. The author seems to forget the fact that packages are only a layer of added ease of installing new software. The act of installing new software from source or binaries distributed by the author is still as free as ever.

I admit that I do install about 90% of my programs as packages, but the problem of central authorities responsible for patching and distributing software and taking too long to do it isn't present in every distribution. I've used Arch Linux for years now, and it solves this problem by separating the packages into an 'official' channel of reliable maintainers testing and releasing new versions on the package system and a user repository where anyone can add packages.

To me, this seems like the optimal solution. Community-maintained packages can be promoted to official ones, from what I can see new versions are released from testing within days and if you're not satisfied with how others maintain the packages, building the packages from the newest versions yourself is almost as easy as installing binaries from the repository because anyone can use the build and packaging scripts used by the maintainers themselves.
>they are mostly consumables which perish in few days or months (I exclude some utitities).

This is simply false, there are plenty of complex apps with varying degrees of usefulness but they certanly don't reduce to 80's game clones and few screen apps. And even if it was true it's not a result of anything intrinsic to the app model. Also "tight control a la Apple" indicates that you missed his point.

How many times did you do make and sudo installed shit on your system to get basic app that should for all intents and purposes be walled of in a sandbox ? Even without sudo why should install script have access to my personal files without explicit permissions ? Did you run in to a situation where you wanted to install the latest version of an app for your system but it wasn't in your distro repo so you decided to build it only to find out that your repo GTK+ library was out of date and your options were rebuild all GTK+ packages or update the OS to alpha ? Even I gave up at that point - imagine the average user wanting to get the latest feature advertised on his favorite app site.

I use Linux desktop daily but it can be a hell and you need to know how to wrestle with the system, it's certainly not idiot proof - and it needs to be for mass adoption. But then again "mass adoption" (IMO) shouldn't even be considered a realistic goal, being useful to techies/developers and available on servers is a good objective too.
Pirate Party Likely to Win Seats in Parliament This Month in Germany