skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What would be an explanation for the partial levitation of the LK-99 sample shown in the video?
They run a cloud VM with a paid RHEL AMI and use it to pull the sources. :-).
What type of convertible note terms are you seeing?
That's basically it, just curious what the norm is for interest, discount, etc. Regional information would be real helpful!
I'm confident that poster's experiences are based on the data they saw

if you're doubting the veracity of the poster's claims, just say so directly
I remember when searching for jobs in the last year of my PhD I was confused about why it was going nowhere even though everyone had told me it would be easy. I then had this huge realization that the only people who had said it would be easy were still in academia and had never tried! And I also remembered that _I_ had sometimes told people that getting an industry job would be easy! I guess it's just a weird thing in math departments that this kind of idea gets thrown around without any kind of validation.

Good that you've realized this early though.
How do you deposit paper checks and both deposit and withdraw and cash?
For reasons I don't remember (time, experience), I know what the win32kfull.sys driver is responsible for. But it kind of irritated me that someone would have to take my word for it.

So I took inspiration from your post to find a definitive source from somewhere, anywhere, or something and you're absolutely right. A simple google search lists pages and pages and pages of just non-sense and potentially dangerous sites.

Not even MSDN (seemingly) has documentation on it.

I did manage to find someone's personal site that appears to be decades of their personal technical notes and findings:

* https://renenyffenegger.ch/notes/Windows/dirs/Windows/System...

* https://renenyffenegger.ch/notes/index.html
The laying of cables is the same: it's single-mode fibre with a PON architecture. Once you have that possible future speeds are 'infinite' with end-point upgrades.

I'm asking: why even get the 25Gig service over the 10Gig? What are you doing with a 25G down/uplink that you cannot accomplish with 10G?
Red Hat always planned to do this. They were huge proponents of the GPL Cooperation Commitment [1], and persuaded lots of gullible developers to irrevocably sign over their rights.

1: https://gplcc.github.io/gplcc/
By the way, that's one important problem with patents.
> Sure, you may lose some nuance, but it's close enough.

Not always. For instance, "coco" means coconut, while "cocô" (notice the circumflex, which corresponds to a change on which syllabe has the stress) means fecal matter. That's not just "some nuance".
It isn't a threat or intimidation - it's simply a potential that Red Hat will stop doing business with you.

Imagine for a moment that you're an indie developer and you contract with a company to supply support for a GPL'ed program under the idea that they're using it internally.

Next thing you know, they're taking the code you're providing and offering a subscriber service and undermining your livelihood contracting with other companies.

OK - the GPL says they can do that. The GPL, however, does not require you to keep doing business with them. So, next contract opportunity you refuse to do business with them.

The GPL does not obligate you to re-up with them. Nor should the GPL force Red Hat to supply future updates to customers that threaten its business.

Just because people have become accustomed to Red Hat doing more than it has to do doesn't mean they're perpetually obligated to live up to those expectations.
The telcos making money from these calls disagree with your assessment of the economic harm of killing them. It'd be shut down in a heartbeat if they were costing them money.
Seems like only a editor. Do that host and run your code also?
Windmills "Fix error", looks so nice. But you need a tight
Integration between the editor / code and the execution platform.
Amazing if true, and can't be released soon enough. In the US this will likely be a million dollars or something insane, because its the US.
SC requires a critical temperature, so the "cooling" part leading to the "producing" part is correct
I think GP makes a totally valid point. Big companies only get punished hard when they defraud powerful people, normal people get punished hard for doing something a company doesn't like.

It really does seem the harshest punishments are handed out for hurting people/companies more powerful than you. The rich and powerful, including corporations, should be held more accountable. Instead, the law seems to get used mostly to keep people in their place.

I still remember how HSBC got fined millions for laundering billions for Mexican drug cartels. Normal people would be doing hard time if they did that. Banks get fined less than the size of the crime.
I don't use Windows. I hate Microsoft. I use Linux (Fedora). I even have a video card working.
Here in the PNW there is basically one corridor that would make sense as a semi-high speed (160+ kph) rail, which is Portland-Seattle-Vancouver. They are all under 200 miles from each other and connected by one road that is often very congested.

The current Amtrak route is not frequent, fast or cheap enough to be a good alternative to driving for most people.

Hourly service between them would be a boon to the whole area, and allow for a ton of flights to not happen between the cities for connecting traffic.
The EU or US will force some business changes on Google, Meta, Apple or Amazon in the name of anti-trust, privacy or consumer protection. Nothing existential, but someone's golden goose will loose some feathers.

ARM processors will become a common choice for Windows laptops and mini-PCs. AMD/Intel will occupy the high end and legacy spaces.

Smartphone makers will add LLM AI assistants to their latest phones to juice sales.

One of the full self driving companies will have a vehicle in a serious accident.
> wouldn't impact anyone's life for many years

Might not impact it hardly at all.
Ow! Not arguing with you, but would like a few links to where I messed up.
Can I hear more about this?
The pearl clutching over which words people use and “degrading the vernacular” is embarrassing. It’s just a word. Words change, languages change, there is no pristine noble ideal language to pursue or maintain here.
Show HN:I love you website builder – QR code as a gift
This website builder allows you to express yourself to your loved one like no other.
Create a website with your photos and text in minutes for FREE.
This makes a great surprise when you deliver via a post card or link. Check it out!
That is a very interesting observation. I've always likened it to the diminishing cost of communication but your insight may well be the better one.
I suspect because (some?) computer terminals had the escape key there, e.g. VT-100
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/vt100.html

Contrast this with, say, a typewriter that would have no use for ESC.
Amen brother.

People fail to understand that rotting in an office is not the type of memory you want when life flashes in front of your eyes on your death bed.

Imagine sitting there, and all you see is a bunch of scrum meetings and planning sessions followed by scuttlebutt with someone your dread gossiping about someone you don't even know, thinking they are your friends.
GPT-3 can reason about as well as a college student, psychologists report
It has to be said over and over, unfortunately.

A license or contract is only as good as your ability to enforce it.
Medical tourism
Hydrogen only exists as a liquid at very uncomfortable pressures and temperatures.

Water can be split into its separate components. It's much easier to gather water than it is liquid Hydrogen, and if one wanted to make a gas station, it would make sense to build it on an asteroid or a small moon where takeoff and landing uses little fuel. Not on a gas giant with triple digit escape velocity and a thick atmosphere asking for a massive heat shield.
off by 1 (order of magnitude)
Plan to throw one away. You will anyway.
- Fred Brooks, The Mythical Man Month.
Why would capitalist enterprises want to derail others? It is unfathomable
Most of the companies in this space are breaking so many laws they are operating outside the US. Near the beginning of the pandemic, when they resumed their calls (that WAS a nice few months!) I would mess with them. I could keep the "Mexican vacation" scam calls on the line for 20 minutes before telling them I knew they were scammers. About 1/2 the time they hung up, but the other times they would argue with me about why I would do this.

The initial call was clearly someone outside the US. The 2nd level was someone with better English skills, but the real scammers at the 3rd level spoke perfect English and were likely inside the US.

And, the initial call to me was from a spoofed number, likely from an owned PBX.

It's a LOT of work to track down these companies. There was a particular scam related to CC rates and I was able to find a lawyer in TX that had successfully prosecuted the company that did the scam. I called him and he picked up after 1 ring. We had a nice conversation, but his advice was: do not mess with these people (by wasting their time intentionally). They are not nice people and after he helped shut them down, they just popped up somewhere else.
60% stepping away means 40% still use it, which is still a tremendous amount more than Threads.
we see what you did there ;)
Awesome idea! like the UI
That's what I know it as in Canada.
Test GitHub Actions Locally
>But think about this clearly. If they were so bad why did they just attack them now? Why not go after them before?

The MKs like Rothman and Levin who have pushed judicial reform the hardest have, in fact, been pushing this since Aharon Barak's Judicial Revolution in the 1990s. Given the circumstances I disagree with their push, but obviously they've been at it for a long time for both principled and political reasons.
That really has no bearing here because regardless of who holds the copyright, what they are doing is permissible under the GPL.
Reach out and have a chat with a recruiter. Tell them about your situation (it's very unhealthy) and skill set and see what they have to say. You're currently employed, which is a great place to be while you look for new work. Have them bring you opportunities that are not just better than your current situation, but align with your ideal situation.
Views are cheap. The audience doesn’t have to make a whole lot of effort to see online videos, and can forget them quickly and go on to the next thing. Racking up big view counts doesn’t mean you’re having any impact, you’re just a slightly bigger fish than all of the thousands of other fishes going by in the stream.
Also discussed at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36982813
Show HN: Open-access book on platform governance
Hi there,

I'm a political theorist, a professor at Northwestern law school and a founding fellow, board member, etc. of the Integrity Institute. I also was the in-house democratic theorist on Facebook's "civic integrity" (election protection) team for a while, and helped out with the research supporting the creation of the Meta Oversight Board.

I just published an academic book with Cambridge University Press bringing together those experiences with research in political science to argue that the way forward for mitigating the harms of big internet platforms and governing user behavior on them is to create global direct democratic institutions for them.

You can read the whole book for free on Cambridge's website or by downloading the open-access (license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) PDF at the link. If you want a hard copy, you can also buy it in paperback or hardcover.
he says "reduction", you respond to "removal". i think that is called a strawman :)

but you are right, everything needs money. so it ends up being a political issue where ideally we democratically figure out how much tax money we give to the train operators
The level of process in this makes me feel like there might be a rather lucrative market here:

1) set up a service that answers calls to your number

2) service tracks the calls and categorizes them for you

3) service uses AI to make calls and collect info

4) service files lawsuit in your name

5) company settles, customer takes 70% of settlement, service takes 30%.
> and if you're on a different side than I am then screw you, even if you are Nature.

Identity politics has metastasized everywhere.
Your right. I have read that human override is still mandatory at level 4.

However it looks like this just changed: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2022-03/Final-Ru...

“For vehicles designed to be solely operated by an ADS, manually operated driving controls are logically unnecessary.29 To account for this, the NPRM proposed a regulatory scheme in which the affected standards would not assume that a vehicle will always have a driver’s seat, a steering wheel and accompanying steering column, or just one front outboard passenger seating position.”

They are apparently allowing level 4 Taxi to be considered full ADS even if they have additional “Stowed controls” options.
Unfortunately, law enforcement organisations have always existed to protect the interests of the wealthy and powerful. Individual officers and agents may (may!) have empathy for the little person, but their employers have a different agenda.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOH1996

Look at that molecular structure. Incredible.

Two amide bonds, a completely unremarkable aryl ether and an unsubstituted naphthalene ring system. No fussy weird metals or bonds that need pampering, no chiral carbon atom in sight.

You could probably pay someone a very modest amount of money to end up with kilograms of this stuff, and it would probably not degrade at all under ambient conditions.

I wouldn't be surprised if we soon see desperate, sick, rich people try this out on themselves, skipping FDA approval.

Beautiful, uplifting news. Let's hope the clinical trials proceed without issue.
Tbh Since it's a small molecule you can just hire a lab to make a custom synth , I've seen it done a few times,
The brains of much of the HN userbase were fully enshittified long ago
No, they would add new collation rules to the Common Locale Data Repository, similar to the ones that define that Y sorts between I and J in Lithuanian: https://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/42/collation/lt.html
> Watching the process happen in real time is fun and exciting.

YOU ARE NOT WATCHING THE PROCESS.

The people who have spent their lives on superconductors and who have the expertise to replicate and conclusively evaluate these claims so far haven't said anything publicly. They are presumably busy doing the actual hard work.

What you're doing is watching is a side show full of influencers on social media.

I can open my rss feed for hep-ex today and read something like this:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.01468.pdf

Which is due ultimately to the work of over 1,000 people on the LHCb collaboration (two of them now deceased), but the conclusions are just "agrees with the standard model" so the result of the very good work done grinding away at the problem has no headline generating potential. Most of the people here fawning over the excitement of science done in the open wouldn't ever bother trying to read that kind of paper, and probably don't know that sharing physics preprints over the internet dates back to before the Web existed (and to before most of them existed).
Understand the “why” behind the movement of metrics in your dashboards
Existing BI tools excel at presenting current state (“What”) and the fluctuation history (“How”) in key metrics like daily active users (DAU), revenue, session time, etc. However, they fall short when it comes to providing insights into the underlying reasons behind fluctuations ("why"). As a result, manual work is required to examine the numerous segments under the metric using various slice-and-dice queries followed by a custom script to sort and summarize, which often takes hours or even days of manual work.

DSensei replaces the manual work by employing statistics and AI technologies to holistically analyzes all the segments, group the correlated ones together, and indicate the ones that are the key drivers of the metrics fluctuation. The whole process only takes seconds to minutes depending on the dataset. With these swift insights, organizations can gain a comprehensive understanding of the underlying reasons behind metric fluctuations and promptly devise action plans.
yeah, that's what I'm doing now as well.

A couple days ago from one part of SF to another:

- Uber: 2 Miles, 25$, 16 minutes (doesn't include the subtle lying on waiting time).

- Walking: 2 Miles, 0$, 30 minutes, healthier.
Maybe but that's true for all systems (the last 1% of unknown are always the hardest and longest to figure) and Genesis emulation quality /hardware knowledge are certainly not behind other systems nowadays
How long until this work-around is "patched" by RH/IBM?

This is a big part of the reason there's so much uncertainty in the RHEL community right now...
he's from the long now sect
The lack of F keys continues to boggle my mind on these custom layouts. I need to be be able to mash F5 or F8 at a moments notice without any chording nonsense. Unless you are working from an ironing board, most desks have ample “vertical” space to extend towards the monitor with the extra keyboard row.
> The Software Conservancy analysis summarized the conundrum as a pick-your-poison scenario: “In essence, Red Hat requires their customers to choose between (a) their software freedom and rights, and (b) remaining a Red Hat customer.”

The community may be large enough to end-run this. Every month, a new subscriber gets the source code, publishes it, and yeets their subscription. Or, if I'm reading this right, they cancel their subscription so they are no longer under its T&C, and then publish the code.
An ignore list would already be pretty good (and I'm sure plenty of people would ignore me :) ). Wasn't there a plug-in for that at one point?
This whole article is weird to me.

I don't really understand the point of a "dev box" that's hosted in a DC and shared, at all - at least not the way they're painting it here.

Hardware capabilities for even consumer level laptops and desktops have progressed much faster than average network connections.

Having testing/preview/branch named environments in a DC? Sure. But this line:

> They should be able to run any software they want inside their own workspaces without impacting each other.

What does that even mean?

Is this about someone working on a feature branch that uses some new dependency that needs to be installed?

That's 100% the sort of thing your local development environment is for, until you're ready to push it to your hosted test/whatever environment.

> But when it's running in a VM, the VM gobbles up as much memory as it can and, by itself, shows no inclination to give it back.

Someone, anyone, tell me which hypervisor doesn't enforce a memory limit on VMs?
I predict death of tech firm investment in general. Startups are too volatile to deliver anything over a long period, and the dinosaurs are too fearful to deliver anything new and dying a slow grasping death. The future lies in open source, to which I'm seeing some monetization movements happening there, but I'm not sure how anyone can really bank on something free. Maybe you can. Maybe you invest in the payment brokers for sponsoring open source projects?
If you need capslock that’s easy to emulate in software nowadays. For instance KDE has a default option to toggle capslock by pressing both shift keys.
> I have little interest in hearing lectures about the spirit of open source from open core proponents. None, actually.

I maintain an open source project.

I'd like to lecture you on how Red Hat is violating the spirit of the open source software movement.

How's Tuesday work for you?
Widely, but not exclusively used. Some big vendors at the time that made things like library indexes and legal references used their own completely wacky in-house formats that required lots of fiddling with device drivers. They'd often only work with a handful of CD-ROM devices as well, meaning you're stuck with your $2000 single-speed top-loading NEC drive for eternity.

High Sierra won out, it was the logocal winner, and there was, thankfully, no standards war like with HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray.
I'd buy an old shed and turn it in to a make-shift data centre; plug an ethernet cable in to a mushroom.

MTP, like TCP but more squishy.

The book entangled-life was also a great read [1]

[0] https://www.newswise.com/articles/mushrooms-communicate-with...

[1] https://www.merlinsheldrake.com/entangled-life
So what are you gonna do about it?
This is such an important point I don’t think it can be overstated. Psychological safety is one of the key things to have a well-functioning culture and it’s one of those cultural things that I’ve tried desperately change in past positions. It’s hard, and in one place, almost impossible save for eliminating a few key people who hold onto that mindset and clean house a little bit.

There is no growth, no team cohesion in an environment where you’re berated for asking seemingly stupid or dumb questions. But I think people become numb and indoctrinated to it because “well, I had to endure this when I was learning” is such a demoralizing and abusive stance and nobody wants to change.

Things work so much better when everyone has a chance to pitch in, even if some ideas are dumb, just having the option is miles ahead of whatever bullshit people can justify from the “old way”.

Part of the process to change I’ve found is just leading by example. I’ll intentionally ask stupid questions that I know raise the ire of my similarly-leveled coworkers just to make the point to the more junior people that “hey, this staff-level guy is asking this, I might be able to too”. Junior people will gradually start to get the picture and ignore the rantings and ravings and toxicity of the debbie-downwers and the sticks-in-the-mud.
Yeah this doesn't play out in real world.

Look at any large enterprise Java project. People take shortcuts and break things all the time, even with fairly strict typing and memory safety.

Of course you can enforce things like "no unsafes ever in codebase" on a project, but if you have to reply on guidance for development, then you can simply say "first we write a complete set of tests that are a contract on correct operation, then we develop code", at which point the language choice becomes irrelevant.
I recently upgraded to their 2.5Gb service and it's pretty fast (I had a sustained 110MB/s download over 150GB yesterday,) and generally get 50Mbps upload. It's unfortunately a bit unreliable.

Some days I have 4-5 router resets / blips in connectivity and then can go weeks without it. Two or three times I have been severely throttled by something for an hour or two. This happens at specific times of day - i.e, around 2pm.

When previously on their more basic plan I never had any of these issues.

All of that said, while I have personally not had any issues with Comcast, I'd switch to a local ISP like sonic.net in a heartbeat if it was available in my area.
In at least a couple places, the article says what Red Hat is doing is “technically legal” or “technically in compliance” with the GPL.

I don’t find it very useful or enlightening when people start talking about “intention” in this context. If you intend for some particular outcome to happen, you really need to make sure that it’s written into the license! That’s what licenses and contracts and every annoying legal-type thing that exists are for!

On a related topic: Taking a quick scan of GPLv2, this doesn’t even seem to grossly offend the principles or intent of the license - am I reading it wrong, or, when it comes to appropriately distributed software (i.e., bearing notice, license terms, copyright, disclaimer, etc.), it seems to say pretty clearly that source only need to be provided to recipients of the modified program? I guess there’s some ambiguity about what 2(b) could mean?