skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
beuckelaer predates him in terms of ordinary subject matter, but I don't know if the line is so straight anyway. a couple hundred years later courbet's work was more a rejection of neoclassicism than it was a continuation of any proto-realist's work
Thank you for sharing that! It's unfortunate that the pgAdmin devs weren't interested, although I understand them wanting to keep it focused on being a GUI.
My beef with Maps is the UI. It's so skittish and modal I'm constantly fighting with it.

If I position the viewport ans run a query, it unhelpfully searches a different area. If I tap on a pin it moves the viewport again. If I dismiss the pin info it moves yet again to an arbitrary position. Same for a while other bunch of interactions.

It feels like a UX that thinks it's clever but doesn't respect me as the user.
Currently working on multiple apps hitting anywhere between 5k and 150k maps loads a day, costs are zero because we do not do things outside of the free usage tier. The Maps Embed API (the one you see on websites) is pretty clear on that: https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/embed/usage...

Pricing for the Maps Embed API
All Maps Embed API requests are available at no charge with unlimited usage.

Other usage limits
There are no short-term (queries per second) or long-term (queries per day) limits on the Maps Embed API.

Similar things apply to the Maps SDK for Android. Seeing the watermark means that there's either no API key being sent with the request or, in relatively new developments, that you haven't enabled billing/inputted a credit card. Which is a scary thing to do when you know that you're not doing anything out of the usage limits... but what if Google suddenly decided that ?
I have a copy of Byte magazine with the front cover that says “Is Unix dead?”.

Back then, everyone thought Windows NT had “won”, and it was game over for every other operating system.

Same thing here. Nvidia might look strong now but all it takes is an open source project that competes effectively to change everything.
Im addition to lighting, photographic details are also affected by the size of the aperture, exposure and sensor size. The no one thing that's variable at runtime is exposure.

Auto-exposure can trivially solve for this when you optimize the image for the target subject. If you care for facial recognition, then a washed-out (or dim) background won't matter. Adjusting exposure is not rocket science.
That extremely depends on your location - notice there's another thread above you complaining it doesn't use Yelp anymore.

eg the US and Australia now have built-in reviews.
So you already can use OpenStreetMap, but don't? Presumable because Google Maps is better? So maybe the answer is that "we" don't make Maps a non-profit majority of people (me and, apparently, you included) actually prefer superior ad-supported product?
Curious if you're using Lisp for the chip design at Intel? If you're allowed to talk about that..
Well yes. But that isn't an option for most people.

I suppose it goes to the heart of what you want open source/free software to be.

If you're happy for it to be a niche thing only for 'geeks' that pov is legitimate. If you want the wider world using it then such answers aren't reasonable.
> Fake food is a huge thing in japan.

Indeed.

If you ever have the opportunity to visit Kappabashi Street in Tokyo, in addition to the endless shops selling an impressively vast array of the usual catering equipment, you will also find shops selling ready-made fake food and dishes. So you can, for example, take home a piece of fake sushi as a souvenir of your Japanese adventures.
Appreciate you both. :)
Ocassionally yes.
Google Maps exist(ed) to get the people who wrote Google Maps promoted. The other stuff doesn't really matter. Google is not well run enough to be able to care about those things!
Because AMD is tiny in comparison and they are fighting titans on the CPU and GPU fronts, meaning they have to pick their battles.

They decided to fight Nvidia on the gaming segment and let them win productivity. It seemed like a good strategy a few years ago when GPU were unobtainium, not so much today.
What makes you think they detect and point out all the fraud? These sites are hobby sites run by people who just run some very basic text filtering software. If fraud was being reliably detected paper mills wouldn't have businesses, yet these companies seem to be quite common and exist in multiple countries.

And recall that I said all this work pre-dates ChatGPT. Using LLMs to generate scientific papers works great, and you won't be able to find them using regexs.

The journals themselves admit there are serious fraud problems and that they don't know what to do about it. So it's very concerning. The world needs a trustworthy scientific literature.
SSR and More for React Native Web
Let's make it "triple irony", then, I suppose ?
I do not know if things have changed, but the amazing thing about fake food in Japan for me was always that the real food that you got in the restaurants actually looked like the fake food on display. This is a huge contrast to western fast food chains, where the product and the advertisement often look about as similar as Danny DeVito and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
China faces a real dilemma in how to achieve it's goal of annexing Taiwan, killing the Taiwanese intellectuals, suppressing the natives and looting the industrial/IP assets:

An attack across the strait with a large buildup of troops (150,000+) and SEAD campaign will need months of logistical preparations which comes with the risk of giving the ROC enough warning to build a nuclear deterrent.

However, a rushed attack with less than three months of preparations is likely to be repulsed by the ROC military unless China resorts to a Grozny-style leveling campaign that would unfortunately make the whole endeavor unprofitable.
I suspect these trades are artefacts of that way of thinking. Some people have a frequent flow of ideas they are compelled to capture in one way or another.
Absolutely not a problem! I was just slightly surprised (-:
Haha yea, i thought exactly the same thing! Business insider, fast company, wired, all in the same league…
A funny thing about Google Maps in Brisbane is that the satellite/3D map was from 2010 last I looked, but the image copyrights all say 2023.

(But just checked again and they refreshed it finally.)
This is why regulation is required to force companies to release feature-parity APIs and protect reverse engineering projects from legal threats.
That was about the time they removed the scale, right?
D&D Beyond: “On AI-Generated Art and Bigby Presents: Glory of the Giants”
What do you mean “cannot be used”? Applications have to be coded specifically for huge/large pages. It’s similar on Linux, only certain applications support huge pages.
Open source has pretty obviously become much less politically tolerant over time.

There was never a time when open source was tolerant of outright bigotry.
The rabbit hole that is the Blancmange curve wikipedia page goes very deep, though. See you back here in a few years?
In most parts of the world? A lot less, but also in those parts of the world it's probably hard to get $1million in the first place.
Yes exactly, if you want to, say, meet at a specific Marriott hotel and put it in directions, this helps disambiguate. Google Maps does a good job of it without, but will still show you completely different ones if you don’t have the unique-ish name.
You can’t trust it enough to rebut it? That doesn’t make sense. If his results are biased due to funding sources then it should be even easier to call bullshit on his science.

Reminds me of people who don’t want public debates on controversial topics because “we don’t want to platform our opponents bad ideas.” Their point is weak so they refuse to engage. Same with Greenpeace: can’t argue the science? Just use an ad hominem!
Google is an advertising agency. Advertising agencies do not stand for anything. Never did and never will. So please cut google some slack. It is their web after all.
The full quote surrounding that from my comment:

> At this point, Dijkstra had become the opposite of busy. He spent almost all of his time thinking and recording his ideas. He only came to campus on Tuesdays. And yet, as Dijkstra’s colleagues noted:

> “The Burroughs years saw him at his most prolific in output of research articles. He wrote nearly 500 documents in the EWD series.”

> In this specific case study we see hints of a general observation about slow productivity. Busyness is not the engine of production. It can, in many cases, instead be the obstacle to accomplishing your best work.

So management was incompetent in not seeing this dude was prolific when thinking at home.

But as with almost anything: it depends. Some people are work better from home, other do better in an office. All these return to office policies are BS IMHO: as long as the people you directly work with are OK with you working from home, go do that.
That's an interesting perspective, hadn't thought of it that way. Even so, the fact that everything is so overwhelming also adds to that problem in a way. Can't see the wood through the trees so to speak.
I can also (depending on industry) see a dual model (freemium vs paid):

If (generally) more data is better. As a site owner I might be happy to give free access to most of my public data and urls. You be at the mercy of my sites unique formatting and hiccups

But for some fee, I might be happy to provide api-like data access to some of my historic data that are more rich with information and promised some sort of format-encoding (AI-JSON ?)

The economics I think are still currently be discovered.
My theory is: The more people you help earn money, the more you earn.

Private Equity is explicitly excluded, maybe they do, who knows?

Example 1 Bill Gates/Microsoft: Provided a stable platform for business software to run on, making it possible for millions of businesses to do accounting/inventory management/controlling CNC machinery/etc.

Example 2 Sales People/Marketing: If you got the best product/software/whatever but zero customers, how are you you gonna pay your bills?

[edit]

Example 3 Jeff Bezos: Building the dominant platform for e-commerce of all kinds. Making it easy for a huge crowd of potential customers to discover and buy your wares.
This actually reminds me on what I've read about a period in French monarchy (I'm a bit foggy on the specifics of the time and place and people involved) where the French aristocracy developed a fascination with the "simple life" and would play dress-up to recreate the perceived "ease" of the life of the peasantry (because they were of course entirely detached from the burden carried by their subjects). This wasn't fueled by some sort of Calvinist attempt to appear humble but rather the belief that those peasants were all having a lot more fun so by trying to dress like them and play pretend you could have fun like they do.
It’s giving a positive so likely there’s a bleach and fogging + re-development step on top of the usual ones.
The term process hollowing wasn't used until around 2010? Or earlier?
With todays virtual reality, I think its clear technology is creating dissociation.

Anomic Aphasia, people get that all the time, I've experienced it all my life, and seen it in people of all ages, so I guess you are perhaps looking at frequency of occurrence, whilst ignoring the range of topics being discussed, which for some people will be quite narrow pertaining to only their occupation and limited interests eg tv genres, whilst for others, will be quite wide, mainly due to the ease and amount of time they might spend reading or watching stuff online.

Your submission seems like phishing psychotherapy.
I'm already rooting for CFS' Sparc over ITER anyway. ITER is too big & expensive, if Sparc works it's an indication that we can build fusion "on a budget", too.

Idt CFS will care because they've already sourced much of the HTS tape that they need and their schedule doesn't permit waiting for LK-99 to be proven/disproven and all the years it will take to produce LK-99 in bulk anyway.

It's so insanely cheaper, because not only do you not need the cryogenic cooling (and all the support and maintenance systems and consumables like helium or nitrogen or whatever), but LK-99 is made from relatively common elements versus rare earth elements.

I really, really hope this stuff works.
I disagree that they're a good choice. A good choice is jkl;

> This is why Vim-spinoffs like Helix and Kakoune, while turning the whole keybinding system on its head, are both keeping hjkl. Not for historical legacy, but because it’s actually a good choice.

I had a look this morning and I couldn't find anything to back this claim up. My claim would be it's the opposite, it's what the authors are used to, it reduces friction for other people who might change, but it's objectively inferior than having the keys be the same as the home row keys themselves.
My frugal indie dev startup stack (2022)
> "I once watched a fast-food server placate a violent customer with nothing more than her voice and a stale honey cruller at her disposal." This is given as an example of a "skill" that should be considered admirable. It should be considered unnecessary. It should be considered unnecessary. A fast food worker placating a violent customer with a stale honey cruller is an unwelcome intrusion into a stable society, not something exciting and meaningful to be imitated. No one should be behaving violently towards fast food workers, and if they do, it shouldn't be fast food workers who are placating them. We could just close fast food restaurants at night. We could put people in jail for a long time if they behaved poorly towards service industry employees.

What exactly is your solution for "bad behavior" in society then? Of course nobody should act poorly towards others, but what people should do doesn't seem to stop them.

I don't agree with the author that these skills are as unique as she claims, but your comment reads as if you're projecting your own bias onto the piece. Whether or not it's sex work, front line work, office jobs, or whatever, huge swaths of society work jobs that they don't particularly care for to get paid. Writing off the whole piece as "she had low standards for herself and found sexual validation of strangers easier than grinding out a living" misses the point (and is completely unsupported by the text).
Yeah, that's something a rational person should do. Self destruction hardly ever is rational however, and it's near impossible to see all of the collateral damage you make when destroying yourself.
The answer is you grow up, make decisions "behind closed doors" and live with the consequences.
Yeah these sorts of inconsistencies are exactly what Im talking about.
> OSM can't show (and plan for) traffic, for one.

Unfortunately there's nothing to aggregate current traffic information (traffic jams etc.) as far as I know.

The maps themselves support all sorts of routing options for walking/bikes/cars, at least: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing#End_users:_routi...

They also have a Wiki page on public transport: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport

Sadly, they don't even attempt to have public transport schedules on the main maps, whereas Google has even added inter-city buses in some places, as well as having an integration with Bolt or other platforms I think.

That, in addition to the lack of business information, business hours, reviews and so on makes OSM a bit inadequate in comparison, which is unfortunate. There have been other maps that build on top of OSM data (which is great), but they're still pretty small in comparison.

It would be interesting to see how OSM would fare if it actually tried to compete with Google: 1st party Android/iOS map with some open dataset for business information, integration with some review platform, aggregated public transport maps with an underlying open dataset and stuffing their pockets as much as possible with money from Bolt/Uber/whatever to ensure longevity of the platform, by adding helpful suggestions for trip routing, as well as aggregating traffic data.
It is the same in EU.
Nobody uses Bing, which is just another combination of TomTom and OSM like old Apple Maps was.

(You can tell nobody used it because it was just as bad as old Apple Maps but nobody complained about it.)

Their only appeal is they sometimes license nicer satellite images than other people.
do the same with phones then. unlock them when they stop being supported so you can run your own software.

id accept the same for hive if there was an open ecosystem to move it to.

point is, if companies want to retain control of something they actually need to maintain it. if they dont want to maintain it, they need to give up control. they cant have it both ways.
> In other words, by forcing it to predict the next token, but giving it the flexibility to do so in any way it deems helpful, LLMs have learned higher order concepts such as abstract reasoning and "general intelligence".

To my understanding there is not any evidence of Abstract Reasoning or "General Intelligence" in Large Language Models such as ChatGPT.

For example, I found a website that defines and has abstract reasoning tests it says are currently "AI Resistant"[0]:

> Resistance to AI tools (like ChatGPT) is checked each week.

> Based on the last check, it's unlikely that AI tools will be able to help answer this question

The test is a "Combining Figures" test where one sees a series of three shapes where the first two overlayed on top of each other create the final shape and a final series where one of the three shapes is missing and you have to figure out which of a set of possible shapes should go there.

It's pretty straightforward to show that you and I can pass this test, but ChatGPT 3.5[1] has low chances:

---

Please solve the following abstract reasoning puzzle.

Given a numbered set of 1 by 3 tiles represented by uppercase O's for empty spaces and uppercase X's for filled spaces such as:

1. OXO

2. XOO

3. XXO

And given a different numbered set of 1 by 3 tiles such as:

1. OOX

2. XOX

3. XOX

Now given just the first two 1 by 3 tiles of a numbered set of three:

1. XXX

2. OXO

Which of the following choices is the correct third tile following the previous sequence?

a. OXO

b. XOX

c. OOO

d. XXX

Please explain your reasoning for how you arrived at this choice.

---

In order to solve this abstract reasoning puzzle, we need to identify the pattern or rule that governs the transformation between the first two sets of 1 by 3 tiles. Let’s analyze the given sets:

Set 1:

1. OXO

2. XOO

3. XXO

Set 2:

1. OOX

2. XOX

3. XOX

Comparing both sets, we can see that the transformation occurs horizontally across the three tiles. Let’s look at each column independently:

1st column: In both sets, the first tile is “O”, so no filling pattern can be determined.

2nd column: In both sets, the second tile alternates between “X” and “O”.

3rd column: In both sets, the third tile repeats the same filling pattern as the second tile.

Now, let’s analyze the third and final set consisting of the tiles:

1. XXX
2. OXO

Based on the pattern observed in sets 1 and 2, we can deduce that the third tile must repeat the same filling pattern as the second tile. Looking at the second tile of the third set, it is “OXO”. Therefore, the correct third tile to follow the pattern would be “OXO”.

Therefore, the correct choice is:

a. OXO

---

[0] https://www.testdome.com/tests/abstract-reasoning-test/142
[1] https://huggingface.co/spaces/yuntian-deng/ChatGPT or similar free ChatGPT 3.5 interface
Org-babel can do a lot of this, no?
You might find this channel interesting: https://youtube.com/@shiey
> That being said, I don't personally see any security value added or removed by an installer process needing to elevate privileges. That's a one-time thing and likely should require admin privileges

Where I worked before we didn’t have root access on our laptops, so we couldn’t install Docker.

I’ve switched company since, but my former coworkers were able to install Podman (not Podman Desktop) without root access.
Yes, I run the 4bit, 70B on a threadripper 32 core using llama.cpp. It uses around 37Gb of RAM and I get 4-5 tokens per second (slow but usable). Core usage is very uneven with many cores at 0% so maybe there's some more performance to be had in the future. Sometimes it gets stuck for a few seconds and then recovers.

It gives very detailed answers to coding questions and tasks just like GPT4 does (though I did not do a proper comparison).

The 13b uses 13Gb with 27 tokens per second the 7b uses 0.5Gb and I get 39 tokens per second on this machine.Both produce interesting results even for CUDA code generation, for example.
OpenSpace uses 32 bit floating point numbers and can scale from planck length to the whole diameter of the observable universe with practically no loss of precision. The problem with this approach is that KSP would need to rewrite the entire rendering engine and physics engine from scratch to support infinite precision.
For those purposes yes, I can't disagree and use it myself. However often enough I actually want a map to simply orient myself or get a sense of the geography of a place, and for that purpose Google Maps is rather useless.

When you zoom out, everything is just green, no matter if it's actually a forest or not (okay, some areas with agricultural usage have been mapped, but it's far from comprehensive where I live), and when you zoom in everything is just a featureless grey-on-grey, with no way to distinguish between built-up areas and various kinds of open spaces, tree-covered or not. (Only "parks" still get shown in green – and somehow in France Google has decided to include large scale "natural parks" covering hundreds of square kilometres or more in that category, in which case once you zoom in everything in that area is shown on a green background, which is equally useless.)
Indeed!

Although no human is going to read robots.txt or bots.txt

It'll end up as a small section in the EULA of the website which nobody reads:

> Before you click the 'reply' button please be aware we are allowing AI to crawl our comment section for training. Thank you for your consideration.

There's a little problem though:

1) Websites don't have an incentive to inform their users about this, and websites don't have an incentive to allow AI to crawl their content unless they get something back from it (e.g. payment). From this PoV, its time for OpenAI to start paying.

2) The competition (China, Russia) doesn't care about bots.txt or robots.txt and will just crawl whatever the hell they can.
I'm not saying experts are perfect. I'm not saying they don't get stuff wrong. It's simply that someone educated in a matter is less likely to be wrong in their area of expertise than a random person off the street who knows nothing about that field.

> Representative democracy where it actually did as promised, would be that the elected people would do what the ones who elected them wants.

Different people want different things. Some people want to go to the moon. Some people don't. Who should get their way? Surely that decision should be made by someone who knows that they're talking about as opposed to randoms like us?

Please also address this from my previous comment:

> My entire point is most people know nothing about science, why should they be making these decisions? Many people believe Covid-19 is a hoax and that the earth is flat and that vaccines cause autism, should we really be taking their opinions on matters they don't know about seriously?
> It's just a franchise name now, like RCA.

If it has a points system and co-branded credit card it's real enough.
> The article argues that the causes of anxiety and depression were more complex than has previously been suggested and seeks to provide a more sophisticated analysis of women's experience. (From the paper's abstract)

... and this article here seeks to over simplify it again.