skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’ve been using Terragrunt [0] for the past three years to manage loosely coupled stacks of Terraform configurations. It allows you to compose separate configurations almost as easily as you compose modules within a configuration. Its got its own learning curve, but its a solid tool to have in the tool box.

Gruntwork is a really cool company that makes other tools in this space like Terratest [1]. Every module I write comes with Terratest powered integration tests. Nothing more satisfying than pushing a change, watching the pipeline run the test, and then automatically release a new version that I know works (or at least what I tested works).

[0] https://terragrunt.gruntwork.io/

[1] https://terratest.gruntwork.io/
I don’t really see the need to commit to throwing my first iteration out. I do refactor pretty aggressively at the outset of a major project or code change though. It often takes me quite a bit of time before things really get off the ground because of this. The result is probably the same—that I’m paying a lot of attention to making sure I’m going down a good path.
> It's strange to me how Melatonin is so uncontrolled in usage, dosage, etc., despite being a hormone.

You can thank Mel Gibson and industry lobbying [1][2].

[1] https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/supplements-a...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV2olDA0w8U
Most of the time diamond dependencies are upstream, not because the software itself requires two versions.
Melatonin causes wild dreams for me, too, but I actually enjoy them. Free cinema.
Texas couple dies in home after air conditioning failure
Biden Promises to 'Cure Cancer' If Elected. Here's Why That's Laughable (2019)
"This compound was
found to be orally active and inhibited
tumor growth in animals without causing
any discernable[sic] toxicity even at 6 times
its effective dose." https://www.cell.com/cell-chemical-biology/pdfExtended/S2451...
> Finally, we can break on insert_or_assign as expected and start exploring areas of interest within the standard library

Did you miss this part?
> blocking traffic in v6 is more complicated per se

I don't think that's the case. I think how you set your router/firewall rules with IPv6 is the same as with IPv4 aside from the addresses being longer.

> it's really hard to mess up NAT in a way that causes a breach

You can continue to use NAT with IPv6. I know that when I make the change, I'll still be using NAT, for convenience if nothing else.
Speaking of fruit preservation: has anyone bought prepacked/sliced fruit from the grocery store / Costco that has an "off" flavor to it? Almost like they added some preservative. (The different fruit had the same flavor, which makes me think something was added). I have, and nothing was on the ingredients, so I am wondering what could have been added.
I understand "petty" is a typo, but I kind of agree with that meaning too.
Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
Any idea of the cost of that commute (multiplied by 30,000)?

There must be a business case in this surely, even if it’s worked out based on minimum wage as that’s a lot of commuters.
I have a friend who often works alone for extended periods of time in isolated locations and loves being with people. Similar to your situation, but more outdoorsy. His solution is having an open phone line, just have a call going and occasionally saying things, chatting, joking, etc, or not. Sometimes it's real quiet for long stretches, but it's less lonely. I'm a quiet guy, and even I enjoy being on those calls.
> Why would this be a better example

Because it doesn't specifically deal with members of a protected class, and follow-on discussion about which classes should have protection, nor real-world issues like how private clubs and religious organizations can legally discriminate against those protected classes, or how theater and movie productions can require an actor to be of a certain race (a Bona Fide Occupational Qualification).

> the government can limit the ability of any business to refuse service

It's very well understood that the government has that ability. The government can also force a business to allow someone in who is (or is not) not wearing an N95 mask, and also force a business to allow someone in who is exercising open carry.

There are many such examples.

Given that, why single out civil rights law and its associated sets of who may be discriminated against (discrimination against Jets fans is usually not illegal) and explicitly allowing discrimination, along with a dedicated federal agency (the EEOC) to interpret and enforce the law, along with equivalents at the state level?

Is it because you think your proposed changes requires that level of enforcement bureaucracy, and can't be handled by the current criminal or civil code?

> For certain definitions of 'follow'.

The legal definition is all that matters. Give a relevant counter-example.

> I'm suggesting a change in the law which expands the reasoning that such decision might be deemed to not be totally legit

And I pointed you to a Supreme Court interpretation which says that law will be found unconstitutional. United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/250/300/

Your law, should it somehow pass, would be knocked down by the courts. You need a constitutional amendment to justify this level of restraint of free trade.

Civil rights law says that restraint of free trade is possible because there is a tension between the exercise of free trade and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment, and Congress has the power to find that balance.

Requiring customers to open carry, or to wear (or not wear) a mask are also based in interpretations of constitutionally allowed powers.

Your proposal does not give any similar justification for restraining free trade.
This one first flew back in 2013, dont know whether it landed safely or not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAE_Systems_Taranis

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0omMcNmWKA
The Project Manager Renaissance
I've seen some sketchy people on the Subway before. I just moved to the next car. Look ma, no murder charges!
Automattic is hiring for a variety of roles: https://automattic.com/work-with-us/

Worldwide unless you're in like North Korea or one of ~3 other sanctioned countries.
The demo from AutoGPT makes it seem limited.

I would love to see what cool things people made work but it's too costly for most to pay for the OpenAI api calls.
Ambien makes me wake up screaming at the top of my lungs. Every time. I never remember but it scares the shit out of my wife. No Ambien for me. Lol
Colorado Department of Higher Education data “breach”
There’s no such thing as climate deniers.

There are people asking “Hey, maybe there are additional mechanisms in the climate that cause a hot summer that we don’t know about”? and then there are people running around with their head cut off, screaming about how air conditioning and cars and modern technology is the devil incarnate while offering no practical solutions.
I hadn't heard of this before!

After some digging here are some interesting discoveries related to melatonin and doxylamine:

https://www.reddit.com/r/insomnia/comments/spoaec/anyone_hav...

https://www.reddit.com/r/insomnia/comments/spoaec/anyone_hav...
I don't see the difference between this and just some joe-random's blog post then.

If mastodon posts come from random domains - isn't that like saying "Random Blog Post Links are more common than Twitter/X"?

Mastodon probably won't ever reach critical mass like centralized Social apps do, as much as we technies might want it.
> Isn't the population of China much bigger as well?

Yes, but official government stats have also been overstating the population a bit. I think it mostly affects the younger generation at present though.
That's a non-sequitur for fines. I'm going to be fined the same for speeding whether I'm late for my flight (no financial return), or I'm participating in an illegal street race in which I win $10,000.

Some spamming campaigns do not expect revenue (e.g. recent convictions for a targeted voter misinformation robocall campaign whose desired outcome was to discourage the targets from voting). Tying fines to revenue won't affect the $0-revenue campaigns
Custom controllers? Deprecated and will be removed in v1.30! Please switch to the v1alpha1/ManagedManipulators API (which won't be stable until v1.35)

Cronjobs? Those will be gone too in a few versions. You really should be keeping up with the time-based task working group!

and personally, I think elastic cakehole is not the right tool for the right job. You should really switch to open cakehole by Amazon.
Nor is there a concrete definition of hormone.

Drug: Chemical that affect you (by ingesting), but isn't food.

Hormone: Chemical that affects you.
There's no solving this problem because it is fundamentally human in nature.

the solution is unity. you are right that with a someone in a position in power making decisions it can be very difficult to change that, but when the whole team makes a decision then the whole team can also change that decision.

what is important here is to develop that mindset that everyones input to a decision is valuable. the challenge is that this requires trust that needs to be developed
Could be worse - your frame of reference could be "Weird" Al Yankovic's UHF.

"Badgers? Badgers? We don't need no stinking badgers!"
Pause Random Superconductor Experiments: An Open Letter
> but should not be so large as to be an instant kill for what could be a legal business

Why not? A corporate death penalty should absolutely be a thing. If we can have it for people, then we can have it for a business. The problem is that government sucks at doing its own job and the usual punishments are a joke.
Hilarious might have been the wrong word, but short sighted is what I meant, especially when the warning light has been flashing for 20 years now.

The rising price of oil was taught in my middle school, its not news at this point.
I'm sure it's because of it's age and them kind of creating their version of IAM from scratch (someone correct me if they copied this structure from elsewhere) but you have to do a lot of goofy obtuse work with IAM automation. There are times I have to go into the console/cli and grab some sort of specific UID for an object instead of using its name, things like that that just make it annoying. Sometimes you can't use an account name and have to use the org ID... I could go on. You just kind of deal with it.

I haven't worked on GCP since maybe 2016-17 so I'm not sure how it's going over there anymore.
It’s also possible they fixed the bug in some other way that didn’t involve touching GNU Units, like using a different conversion program only for requests that could trigger the big.
As a note, try to avoid using IR to describe LWIR, there are many IR sub bands (NIR, SWIR, MWIR, LWIR) and your phone camera can detect at least one of them.
I would certainly expect that, if you have the means, the money you pay for preservation and resurrection is only part of your genius plan - and it's the only part this company needs to be involved with.

After that it's a technical issue of how you would attempt to transmit money to someone who died and was resurrected. Ideas in this directions would be things like trusts or foundations which purpose would be your potential eventual benefit. No idea what's the current goto method for this. For example very long term such entities are illegal in some parts of the world, but legal elsewhere.
> But most of the stuff in my home doesn't need high voltage - it's all running at 5V or 12V.

85 volt DC carries the same power as 120 volt AC, but 85 volts DC is essentially safe to touch. The human body has a much lower AC impedance, so it's MUCH more dangerous. DC does still hurt, though.

40-80 volts (see also: split phases) DC is very convenient for most electronics. It's really just things with batteries that want 5-12 volts, but stepping that down isn't too hard.

At the grid scale, it's a question of which is cheaper. If the infrastructure becomes much more expensive (because the wires are SC) then you can save money by using DC (which gives you 41% more power). If its cheaper to use transformers than it is to use more superconductors and semiconductors to convert voltages, they'll do that.

Either way the grid would stay relatively high voltage (10s of kV), because it's just always going to be worth it at that scale to minimize the conductor area.
Ethanol is also a GABA-A agonist if I recall correctly
> - Sincerely, PM of driving directions in SF who takes a company shuttle into the office and doesn't own a car.

Silicon Valley PMs must drive a lot. My iPhone constantly nags me about "driving" when I'm riding the Subway reading a newspaper. Maybe when BART finally completes the ring around the bay we'll see products designed for people that use public transportation instead of driving alone.
I don't think they were talking about a specific trait here. It's simply that any filters/preference women have at all are seen as giving power to women. If a male even has preference in race/religion it's seen as close minded. Political views are about the only "good filter", but you're just putting a huge target on your back anyway.
Any country that used to be part of the Eastern Bloc or the Soviet Union itself.
This could not be found on either google or ddg. Link?
Generative “AI” is human cultural intelligence
Most people know melatonin as extracellular melatonin, released by the pineal gland, which acts as a hormone to promote sleep.

Melatonin is also a powerful intracellular antioxidant that protects cells against oxidative stressors made in mitochondria as byproducts of ATP production. Aside from the pineal gland melatonin, melatonin is produced directly in mitochondria by cytochrome c oxidase upon exposure to near infrared.

https://youtu.be/2Zzo4SJopcY?t=404

That seems more relevant to this discussion.
Did you at least get paid for the extra “time” or was it purely going to the company?

Makes me wonder how the manager (or anyone else doing a similar thing) justified to themselves that doing this sort of thing was ok, since most people don’t like the idea that they’re just straight up committing fraud.
Only if you are ignorant of the Magnuson-Moss warranty act. It is not legal in the United States to blanket void a warranty when a device is taken apart or disassembled. Manufacturers can decline a warranty claim when work down by the owner or another servicer causes an issue, but the warranty remains intact for anything unrelated to the work done. So, as an example, if you repair the plug on your electronic device, and then the keyboard has a fault and a key fails due to a bad keyswitch, they still have to replace the keyboard, as your plug repair has no relation to the failed keyswitch component.

https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/businesspers...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuson%E2%80%93Moss_Warranty...
Jeez... that reads like poorly written PR.

It doesn't belong in academic work, no matter how impressive the authors think it may be.
> One example of vendor-lock the study cites is a procurement process in which the Department of Agriculture in 2021 spent $112 million more to buy Microsoft Office than Google Workspace to avoid switching costs that it perceived to be even higher.

This just shows how incredible ingrained the preference for MS is and how ridiculous expensive it is. Technically a Ubuntu with a browser and Libreoffice should suffice for 99% of a their work and even if one department or office wanted to try this, they likely wouldn't be allowed due to some regulation pushed from the top.
Money doesn't solve all problems, and unfortunately these health systems do not have the IT staff required to even hire competent engineering leadership and then build out dozens of teams required to in-house their EMR.

EMRs are incredibly complex, mainly due to all their integration points, billing systems, staffing etc.
Disclaimer: Co-founder of Terrateam.

For Terrateam[0], we have probably 70% of the enterprise offering but at around 1/10th the price. If there are any features that are deal breaker, feel free to reach out to me and we'll see what we can do. That being said, Spacelift is a much more luxurious piece of software than us. We are very utilitarian, but we have to rationalize that low price-point somehow.

[0] https://terrateam.io
I meant those who don't pay anything per trip e.g. those who have the Deutschlandticket.

They are not freeloaders and I'm not blaming them but the more they travel the greater the burden while they aren't paying more. As with any other unmetered X/month service, the service provider has to make sure there's enough capacity.
Google Invites Employees to Sleep 'On Campus' for a Fee
... I once had someone in publishing try to offer me nature acceptance in exchange for ... things. The outsized role of these journals in the scientific community when reviews could be done in the open is pretty messed up.
> But I'm not sure these are actually the "intent" of GPLv2, which I think would mean what Stallman et. al were advocating back then.

I don't buy it. If you think about the commercial Unix systems in the 80's that GNU was started as an alternative to, the threat to cut off a customer from all future updates would have been just as prohibitive as it is with Red Hat today. Admittedly, with security being more important now than it was then, it's more critical now to get a steady stream of minor security updates. But being cut off from major updates is prohibitive too, given that most customers expect to stay on the system for years, both now and then. And those commercial Unixes were less compatible with each other than modern Linux distros are with each other, so the switching cost would have been higher. (Disclaimer: I wasn't around in the 80's; this is based on what I've gathered rather than personal knowledge.)

Given that context, let's look at Stallman's definition of free software from 1987, four years before GPLv2: [1]

> The word "free" in [the Free Software Foundation's] name does not refer to price; it refers to freedom. First, the freedom to copy a program and redistribute it to your neighbors, so that they can use it as well as you. Second, the freedom to change a program, so that you can control it instead of it controlling you; for this, the source code must be made available to you.

Here is Stallman waxing poetic on the same concept in 2001 (so after GPLv2, but I think it's fair to say his thinking hasn't changed much): [2]

> A program is free software for you, a particular user, if you have the following freedoms:

> [..]

> Freedom Two is the freedom to help your neighbor by distributing copies of the program.

> [..]

> Freedom Two is the freedom to help your neighbor by distributing copies of the program. Now, for beings that can think and learn, sharing useful knowledge is a fundamental act of friendship. When these beings use computers, this act of friendship takes the form of sharing software. Friends share with each other. Friends help each other. This is the nature of friendship. And, in fact, this spirit of goodwill -- the spirit of helping your neighbor, voluntarily -- is society's most important resource. It makes the difference between a livable society and a dog-eat-dog jungle. Its importance has been recognized by the world's major religions for thousands of years, and they explicitly try to encourage this attitude.

Do you really think the person who wrote this would have been satisfied with 'you can technically share the code with your neighbor, but only if you are ready to immediately migrate away from said code because you can no longer receive updates'?

[1] https://www.gnu.org/bulletins/bull3.html

[2] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt
He seems like quite the character and just approaching this as a hobby (?). I've just clicked through his (translated) tweets, that say he made his own method because the documented one was rubbish.

https://twitter.com/szacilow/status/1687518178472054789

> If the procedure worka, it will be patented and published, if not, it won't... I cannot reveal any details at the moment....

https://twitter.com/szacilow/status/1687569413912809472

> I don't know, three days ago I hadn't heard of this material yet, yesterday I developed an alternative synthesis, and today I took the first sample out of the furnace....
Is there a source for the 0.3mg, because the most sleep supplements around here I've tried seem to have at least 0.5mg, or at least 1mg. They contain a mixture of other things as well, like magnesium, leonurus cadiaca, humulus lupulus.

Melatonin only supplements mostly seem to start at around 2mg. There may be few of them at 1mg.

I can't tell if I've personally had any effects from melatonin specifically though. Sometimes I may have sleep issues and those nights, I think none of those supplements do anything.
> It seems there's pretty good evidence that Jesus died and resurrected

What? What's the evidence that he resurrected?
It is not 'Linux only' like you or I would understand it. They have an extremely broad definition of the 'Linux System' which includes thousands of programs:

https://openinventionnetwork.com/linux-system/
It seems that Uber varies this by city. In NYC, they don't see your destination until they pick you up (local law, I guess).
https://mastodon.social/@stroughtonsmith/110708615280659758
We're using Terragrunt with hundreds of AWS accounts and thousands of Terraform deployments/states.

I'll never want to do this without Terragrunt again. The suggested method of referencing remote states, and writing out the backends will fall apart instantly at that scale. It's just way too brittle and unwieldy.

Terragrunt with some good defaults that will be included, and separated states for modules (which makes partial applies a breeze) as well as autogenerated backend configs (let Terragrunt inject it for you, with templated values) is the way to go.
Sorry to hear that! Pricing is hard.

If you haven't yet, please try talking to our sales team. There's usually a way to make all sides happy with some custom agreements - after all, we'd love for you to be able to use our product as much as you need.
It's a routine financial transaction. Often these are structured as leases, where the lender remains the owner. It's common for aircraft, locomotives, etc - things with long, predictable lifespans, insurable against damage.

The problem for the lender is that it's a bet against progress in the field obsoleting the thing. If the user can cancel and send the thing back because there's a more cost-effective model, the lender has a problem. That mistake hurt Lloyds of London in the 1970s.[1]

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/1979/07/30/archives/lloyds-insurers-...