skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>So yes, when somebody pops up to basically say, "how dare anybody consider the feelings of women"

If Vanessa makes a complaint and I say "okay, but why should we care that you don't like it?", am I saying that we shouldn't care women don't like it, or am I saying we shouldn't care that Vanessa is the only one who doesn't like it?

>the best way I can demonstrate my good intent is by correcting anything that is out of line with my intent.

I mean, it's your writing. You can do whatever you want. I'm saying a) it's unreasonable to demand that others change what you don't like just because you don't like it, and b) it's not unreasonable for others to ask you to defend your request for changes.
When we were still dating, my wife milled a Starfleet chevron from aluminum as a present for me. I proposed shortly thereafter.
Do you think that public roads and schools are also immoral?
I'm not familiar with the free tier, but Google Cloud offers direct ipv6 to instances; you shouldn't need a load balancer. You'd need to adjust your network definition to be ipv4+ipv6 instead of ipv4 only; and probably something on your instance too (may potentially need to restart or recreate it, too). There's docs here: https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/ip-addresses/configure...

If you're serving http(s) on standard ports, ipv4 only should be ok. Maybe not ideal, but ok. There's less and less high profile sites doing that, but at least for me, www.reddit.com and www.github.com are both returning only an A record right now; As of now, an internet connection that doesn't get you to github or reddit is clearly deficient, so most consumers have some access to ipv4.

ipv6 may be a little more important if you're doing stuff outside http. For users with ipv6, there's likely to be nat and other network manipulation and restriction on ipv6 vs ipv4. This can be pretty useful for say realtime communications or long mostly idle connections, where CGNAT can cause trouble.
Yeah and maintain and monitor it yourself when you could be building the product
> Depends who's reality

On a trivial level this is correct as words mean what we collectively decide they mean.

However I am making the point that a) the meaning has been changed and b) it has changed in a way that is deceptive and masks a useful fact about the world
For sure. I've added hundreds of addresses myself. But still there's work to do.
Yep, on the roadmap
> are poorly documented

There are many things you can criticize Linux for, but this is not one of them.
Right, I remember parts of that history. Memory protection schemes in other operating systems didn't exactly stay static, though. And a ton of the optimizations that monolithic kernels (mostly looking at windows) did went away just with the lack of need for them. Heck, at the time, Mac wasn't even a preemptive multitasking operating system.

And "drivers" could just restart is laughable with a role play of it. Ok, your wifi driver restarted. What are the protocols to get everyone caught up between that driver and your application for what messages were lost and the messages that are now arriving? This is effectively no different from any distributed application where similar things are unsurprisingly hard to achieve well.

I'll state that I think this is a laudable goal. And I'm happy to see people working on it. Would be thrilled to be shown I'm wrong.
>so you get these big dramatic updates with combinatorial bug explosions.

Yes. My Ubuntu installations always have bugs when I do big updates. A

And while I'm here, snapd can suck it. Me and my homies hate Snap.
What was your AC repair? Did it involve dealing with the refrigerant system or just other electronic components? If so, I'd be shocked too -- AFAIK most commonly-used refrigerant compounds are not generally available to civilians because of the environmental damage caused by their irresponsible discharge.
Do you have a link to where you got the kit? And how much do you estimate you spend in total to get to fly your own plane (including getting a license). (Srry if thats rude to ask)
Sure, but most PIC methods are centered at their element or local domain. (You can likely even do the same with ewald/nbody). I definitely agree with you though if you need high accuracy on position when everything is on the same huge grid.

A simulation that computes bulk properties by simulating particles directly is very rare. At least for me. Observable like temperature, electric/magnetic field strength, stress, velocity, etc are much more common outputs. These often all vary over many order of magnitude across a domain.

Working with continuum mechanics, performing large inverted solves on matrices in fixed precision, or heck, even an FFT sounds terrifying to guard against overflow.
https://vimeo.com/124065314
So you plan is to give chatgpt4 away for free until you can figure out how to make money?
From what I have read 3nm means the smallest gap is 3nm not the whole chip has 3nm spacing between traces. A significant part is probably still 5nm or even 7nm. IMO the difference between 5nm and 3nm is small and more marketing than anything else. The advantage Apple has is the design of the chip and how they can use it with their OS.
I work as a contractor so I move between places. I have found a few companies trying to introduce kafka, and every time it has been a solution in search of a problem.

I don't doubt that it has a good use case but I have so far only encountered the zealots who crowbar it into any situation and that has left a residual bad taste in my mouth. So I fall into the "hate it" side.
I also recall it having some ridiculously low limit for partitions, like 1GB or something.

Apparently because it mmaps the entire disk, and under 32 bit CPUs there's not enough address space.

Which is a ridiculous technical limitation. You could have bigger disks than that by the mid 90s.

Come think of it, my Ryzen 9 3950X supports 43 bits of address space which works out to 8TB. So if that limit applies, even the 64 bit version would be limited on modern hardware.
Yeah, I'm bummed a lot of these perfectly capable chips are unsupported by Windows 11. Only Intel generation 8 or newer CPUs are officially supported. Installing to an unsupported processor puts you at risk for MS withholding security updates from you in the future.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/mi...
Is it easy to cash out once you have your WLD?
I agree. This might be worth optimizing. In case of drugs, you can easily spend the first ten years in research and testing, while paying the patent fees. Software or manufacturing patents, on the other hand, might get different time frame.
Worldcoin does the whole thing wrong.

What they SHOULD do is to--

1. Scan biometrics. They should not restrict themselves to just irises, because not everybody has irises or eyes. But they should only scan things that you can get surreptitiously without too much work... meaning things that everybody gives away anyway just by walking down the street.

2. Bind the biometrics to keys generated only for that purpose, and never used for anything but attesting to other keys... in zero-knowledge so that you can't associate different sub-keys attested by a given master key.

3. NOT bind the biometrics to names or any other information about the person.

4. Go right ahead and publish the biometrics themselves, together with the associated public master keys. Because again, they are not things anybody should be thinking of as secret... and pretending you can keep them secret is foolish even if you don't put them in a database.

5. Stop centralizing the system that attests to the bindings given in (4); do the work to eliminate trust from that. Or at LEAST don't go out of your way to RELY on a centtral authority.

Once you have that, you have all you need for Sybil resistance, which gives you the global uniqueness they need. Then go build your crypto system on top of it.
Sort of. They kind of assume a different specific set of knowledge.
> Either the U.S. government has mounted an extraordinary, decades-long coverup of UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering activities, or elements of the defense and intelligence establishment are engaging in a staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.

I don't see neither being the case.

Intelligence establishment is not behind this. It's just handful of loons, supported by loony congressmen. You could see in the testimony the lack of critical thinking, promising but not providing evidence. etc.

David Grusch's testimony was just crazy and pure hearsay. Vatican helping to recover UFO's. Yeah, right.
And it's not hard to guess why someone wouldn't like them.
me too. :)
So, making a buck creating a huge problem, and then making another buck working on the solution to that problem as a side-hustle. Boy, I'm really proud to be working in Tech in 2023...
I actually think his actual concern here is humans stealing identities and running bots in order to farm any sort of UBI mechanism that gets set up.

It's not about humans asserting their humanness over some evil AGI/ASI machine, it's about sybil resistance. Malicious humans pretending to be thousands or millions of other humans.
Same as every project that involves cryptocurrency - the advantage is that the scammers who promote it can make money from badly reinventing an existing system.
Altman and Blania started it together, and while Altman isn't uninvolved he has at minimum taken something of a step back AFAIK.

As the peer comment says, formally though, Alex Blania is their CEO.
Right. A meteorite strike on the Sphinx is both extremely unlikely considered as an explanation for damage, and also entirely possible given evidence that it occurred.

The same reasoning applies to two UUIDs or Git hashes matching by accident: of negligible probability, yet easily proven if it happens.
> after being inspired by the Cleveland Clinic.

Interesting. I was considering commenting that your experience sounds a lot like the VIP (using the term loosely here, it's much more accessible than "multi-millionaire") care available at the Mayo Clinic. You can accomplish in a day or two what would typically take months to years in many areas of the US, including mine.
>power user...that never needs to pull up a CLI.

What strange creature is this? Is it a mythical creature like a unicorn or closer to big foot?
Just fyi, tiered storage is coming at some point in Kafka: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?c...
.bashrc, .bash_login, .bash_profile: bash(1) manpage

.profile, /etc/profile is a mechanism from the bourne shell, so you would go sh(1) as long as its not bash again. Otherwise mksh(1) or dash(1).

/etc/environment is pam_env(8)
I’m guessing it’s a way to reduce fraud attack surface without relying on something easily lost, like a portable private key?
I made a replica of the… device that a popular video game called Counter Strike uses in game[1]

I designed and 3D printed everything myself including the circuit board, and overall it was a really fun project to work on. There were some areas I could have been more accurate to what the in game model looks like but maybe in a version 2.

It’s a cool thing that sits on my desk and does not leave the house.

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/csgo/comments/10vvupj/i_made_a_repl...
Well there isn't a way to fix this replicative difficulty for many fields. So you're suggesting that the theoretical understanding gained from having produced a specific material just never be added to scientific understanding at all, ever. In an ideal world with ideal budget allotment there would be time and money to build entire replicating labs that can be moved and modularly reconfigured with absolute control over air particulates, pressure, flow, sufficient to replicate any room possible anywhere on earth. But if a lab in the himalayas was able to make a magnet that fundamentally reconfigures our understanfing of physical phenomena, we should simply abandon that potential deeper truth into were able to build a second lab in the Himalayas, or in the middle of the Atlantic.

Reproduction is hard, really really fucking hard. Just saying, that means we should replicate before trying to understand, means essentially cutting off the understanding.

And like others have said, if someone wants to build from it they'll depend on that information being correct, if no one can manage to ever build from it then the idea dies.

Also there's a huge difference between, replicate this study on infant response to stimulus, or spider colony behavior, and, replicate this incredibly intricate semiconductor that took years of configuration to correctly produce.
No merge no fee was really there to guarantee quality and bootstrap trust. We take the hit and pay the devs either way.

If it is abused we would take action to intervene but hasn’t happened yet. When it does happen (< 5%), it’s really good learning feedback for devs

But would you reckon there is another way to solve the power imbalance problem?
I'd love to do something like this with my family someday. Any advice based on your experience?
Thanks for killing all chance at productivity before lunch.. ;-)
„The categories of websites you visit, but not the URL itself, Includes universal plug and play devices and devices that broadcast information to your computer on a local area network: for example, smart TV model and vendor information, and video streaming devices.“

This sounds like a really bad idea to let it run on your pc.
This is basically Spyware, that Scans your (corporate) network too.
I fixed a 3 year old bug in windows calculator
Same. I'm finally at a level where I feel comfortable showing some moves, and it makes me get a deeper understanding of even 'simple' moves.
Not if they don't want to spend a third of their time maintaining their system.
>> you as an adult get asked to “stop helping them get ahead of the class”
> Whether by parental training or self study, some teachers treat it almost as a crime to understand the material before the class starts.

I remember a 7th grade math teacher confiscating my workbook when she found out I had done the entire workbook in the first week. I never really understood why. I spent most of that year telling the teacher she already had my homework and refused to do it again on principle. I ended up taking a 0 on every homework assignment and had a C in the class instead of an A+. Fuck that teacher.

> In college you can sometimes talk your way out of the Intro To XYZ classes and go directly to the upper level stuff.

I did this for first year history, computer science, and calc classes. Highly recommend giving it a try.
This is frankly disgusting behavior. There's zero indication on the homepage that your questions and interactions will be published and indexed on Google, and I think it's an obvious expectation that they wouldn't be in the absence of informed consent. It's common to include proprietary code or sensitive business details when engaging with a tool like this, and it's a vantablack level dark pattern to make that information publicly available as an "SEO growth hack" without informing the user.

EDIT: It sounds like this might not be what is happening. @rushingcreek's original reply seemed to confirm it, and was only edited to add more information after I left this comment.
I somehow found a store in Queens that sold AC parts to repairmen ~ no idea how I originally found it.

I remember Citi-biking over the 59th street bridge to pick up stuff ~ first capacitors, eventually a motor - which is what ended up being the real issue.

The store got a kick out of working w me at first but I think they eventually found it annoying. I suspect repair-folks don't do a lot of returns. EG - if they buy a capacitor and then it's not what was wrong, they end up keeping it for another job whereas I retired it. Also, when I bought the motor that was the manufacturer specified replacement, it wasn't a perfect match for some other part of the unit. I had to bike back to the store and the guy gave me some bushings (which solved the issue) but real repair people would probably know that the shaft thickness changed on that motor and carry some bushings around anyway.

So yeah they were fine to do business with me but they normally deal with large-size orders probably, so my stuff was "cute" but most certainly not a priority for them.
A Chrome extension to teach you the best and most relevant keyboard shortcuts for you.
You can do a limited number of "best model" or GPT-4 searches for free each day (or an unlimited number of GPT-3.5 aka "fast model" searches). We have paid plans for higher limits at https://phind.com/plans.
i feel that the highest impact comes from efforts that have a long term effect. one of these is to change the attitude everyone takes towards the world.

what the world needs the most is more people who understand that we all need to make an effort and contribute to make things better for everyone.

to get people to reach this understanding and be serious about it and also feel like they can actually have an impact, and more importantly have the hope that it will work and is not futile takes living by example and impress that on your family, friends and neighbors. then as your resources allow engage in the local community and show other that making a contribution is easy and worthwhile.

this way slowly there will be more and more people who will pick up this attitude until a critical mass is reached at which point solving otherwise huge problems (like climate change) becomes easy because the majority will be supportive.
Great post, as usual. Lots of good advice for me.

However it makes me sad that she blocked people for defending the author's meaning of "dig". Ignoring seems like a better path. I've often heard grope used in a non-sexual way, as in "groping in the dark" for something. This kind of over-reaction to language is a sore spot for me; like the Stanford language guidelines, telling people not to use the word "field" because it implies slavery. In the same way, she assumes someone defending the word is in favor of sexual assault. This is wrong and harmful, both to others and herself. To others because now they can't follow her posts; to herself because she's cut herself off from people who take the risk to argue something unpopular in good faith. This is how echo chambers form.
Governments tend to
Manjaro can be just as productive out of the box as Ubuntu can.
The only difference between Adobe RGB and the PAL/SECAM color TV-sets from 1970 is in the primary green color, which is much more pure in Adobe RGB and it indeed makes Adobe RGB great for print work.

On the other hand, for viewing images on monitors, Adobe RGB is not a desirable color space. The worst primary color of PAL/SECAM and of the closely related SMPTE C and Rec. 709 color spaces is the primary red color.

While in the blue and green regions the colors that are not representable in PAL/SECAM/SMPTE C/Rec. 709 can be represented by reducing their saturation, in the red corner, from purple to yellow, besides colors that can be represented by reducing their saturation there are also colors that can be represented only by reducing both their saturation and their brightness.

Moreover, in the red corner, from yellow to purple, there are many frequently encountered objects with such saturated and bright colors, e.g. flowers, fruits and clothes.

So the really noticeable improvement in color reproduction on monitors is when passing from PAL/SECAM/SMPTE C/Rec. 709/Adobe RGB to monitors with DCI-P3 primary colors.

DCI-P3 keeps the primary blue of PAL/SECAM, but it has much better primary red and primary green colors. The green is not as good as that of Adobe RGB, but the better red provides a much more visible improvement.

Many relatively cheap monitors, e.g. all my Dell monitors, have a menu option to replace the default sRGB color space with the "DCI-P3" color space (and they can display almost 100% of the DCI-P3 color gamut). On any such monitors, by "DCI-P3" is meant the Apple Display P3 color space, i.e. DCI-P3 primary colors combined with the PAL/SECAM D65 white and with the sRGB non-linear transfer function.

In cheap monitors, the DCI-P3 color gamut with 10 bit per color component is the best that can be found. The monitors whose color gamut is a larger fraction of the Rec. 2020 color space are expensive, because they normally must use quantum dots or OLED or both.

Nevertheless, as the output color space for any high-quality photograph, the Rec. 2020 color space is preferable, even if most people who would look at the photograph now would clip its color gamut to the sRGB or DCI-P3 of their monitors. However those who have better monitors, whose numbers will be increasing in the future, will be able to see any color that can be displayed by their monitors, without having the quality of the photograph already degraded by whoever has processed it.
> As said before, in this tutorial we will be using Manjaro due to it:

> * containing a fully configured system (yes bloat, idc its a beginners tutorial)

So is it for beginners or power users? Or can that be the same person? Choice of Manjaro is also curious, considering its history.
From the article,

* Energy gain in this context only compares the energy generated to the energy in the lasers, not to the total amount of energy pulled off the grid to power the system, which is much higher.

I'm leaning towards the "in mice" but still a step forward.

Disclaimer: Not a physicist.
I'm very open to that debate, but then show it. Exclude the drivers from the numbers. To do otherwise feels very dishonest.

Process isolation and selinux are things that exist. You even mention it. Turns out, having complete isolation between basically everything in your system is hard. I don't see how microkernels will make that difficulty disappear?
I had a tinkerboard S. The software support was horrible. It also had big thermal issues.
Um, "personhood" and currency aren't anything like the main functions of a government. If you had everything Worldcoin wants to do, it still wouldn't replace any governments.
Ben Finegold played one of the game on a virtual board, it is the best place to learn the one of the games. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrQlpY_eGYU
My personal hot take on this is that this is emblematic of present day design strategy: first, abdicate responsibility for meaningful customizability (meaningful = anything but maybe aesthetic theming). “UI is hard.” Once you’ve accepted that it would be impossible to create settings that would be useful and worthwhile, then you just make a bunch of static choices based on what you think the average dummy would want, or write an algorithm to decide it all non-deterministically, which gives a small chance that it will occasionally meet needs more complex than the most basic use case.
I’m interested too to see those benchmarks
"I bear urgent news! The king is planning to destroy the margrave, not by force of arms but by monopolizing the right of seigniorage!"
The issue there is running it on k8s. On bare metal or even VMs it’s not at all hard to run even at scale.
or what's a 360° feedback performance review for?
Nothing will be indexed unless you actively share the link to your conversation on an indexable site (like Twitter), which implies that you wish the link to be public anyway. I assure you that this is not an intentional dark pattern.
Epic failure to have no mention of THE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUMPS

Edit: see #Users ⇣
Definitely do not need to pay thousands of dollars to get advanced instruction on math.

Many public schools allow students to partially enroll in a community college and take classes there. At the very least, if you take a modest amount of initiative, you can negotiate a way to allow for a mild deviation form the standard curriculum.