skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Forget naming, it isn't the problem.

Think about what is important about the 'thing', not just itself, but the context the importance is attached to.

I've found that people who have a hard time with naming aren't having difficulty naming, they are having difficulty with thoughts about the item and the system that surrounds it.

Also, don't perseverate. Learn to refactor well, choose the best name that you can given the time you can spend on it, and move forward.

Even if you come up with the perfect name, systems and requirements change, which mean names will too.
Grindr Punishes Staff for Union Drive with Surprise RTO Order
Every generation I know of has blamed the world's problems on the older generation and claimed that when they take over, things will be different. So far, anyway, those generational changes haven't resulted in such things being different.

The problem isn't with any specific generation.
> I was told (manipulated?) that having things, better cars, better equipment, luxury, wealth, was the right thing to do.

When I grew up, I had one pen, one mechanical pencil, one bottle of ink, and etc , at any time. They were enough, and I never felt inconvenience. Having moved to the US, I was shocked to see how many one-time things. Parents buy dozens of pencils for every kid every few months. Hundreds of god-knows-what in stores like Party City. Kids get them via goodie bags in birthday parties and then throw them away quickly. It seems, well, just too much and unnecessarily wasteful.

And isn't "luxury" meant to send a message to beholders? I failed to see the need to pay for such message at all. If you're rich, you're rich. You don't need anyone else to know unless others knowing that gives you an advantage. On the other hand, I have to admit that premiere goods drastically improve the quality of life. A quiet car is much more pleasant to drive than a noisy one. An equipment that simply does not break down gives me peace of mind. A powerful air conditioner is a godsend in an extreme weather (most of the time a fan is good enough, though). The top-line MBP is certainly more enjoyable than the cheap model Boeing gave to its engineers. Frankly, I sometimes don't know where the line is.
I wish I could keep using my current unsupported android phone but slowly all my critical apps are no longer working including the banking apps which won't support my android version. What do you do about that?
I think it is obvious why valve doesn't want this. People are selling things in their game through a route they don't have control over. It might even get legally questionable.

The title is also lying, at least the tweet only mentions one possible way of monetization. It explicitly calls out selling items, but not other forms of monetization, e.g. donations.
Today it might be a gold mine for training an AI. Changes over time would really add to the "knowledge" that it could generate.
The quote in the middle of the article

Most of your recent output has been for streaming. What do you see as the importance of the theatrical business?

I certainly think in cultural terms it's necessary. It's a good thing. It's a good thing for people to go out and see movies together. I think it's a collective good. For people to go out and experience art together in numbers, I think is a good thing. It also provides a potential windfall that doesn't exist in the streaming world, which is you make a movie, and it blows up the way these two movies just blew up over the weekend. It's great that Stranger Things blows up, and it means people are on Netflix instead of somewhere else, and it may result in some signups, but it doesn't bring the kind of pure cash windfall that a movie that makes a billion-and-a-half-dollars does. And so that's the problem. If you're a streamer, you have a show that hit; once everybody has seen it, it's just sitting there. It's not throwing off any more revenue because you're not selling it to anybody else anymore. That is a sort of mathematical chink in the streaming platform economic model. And the same goes for a hit TV show. The inability to really monetize your monster successes, I think is a problem.
Is this different from any other used laptop whose condition is misrepresented?
Well, medication is the main one.

Besides that, the main thing I've learned is there's no one-size-fits-all type solution. Sit down and pick one thing you want to improve on, the smaller the better. E.g. procrastination of chores is a big issue for me, and there I realised I'd been looking at it from the wrong point of view. Trying to motivate/schedule chores was completely pointless. The real issue was how easy it was to procrastinate it for something else. Once I reframed it as making procrastination harder, solutions were easier to find. One problem was I would just stop by my computer in the morning to check social media or HN or what have you, and end up sitting there for 5 hours doing various things. So I time-locked my computer using pam_time on linux. Sure, I could perfectly well bypass it by booting up a usb stick and editing the configuration, but that would take time, and some planning(gotta find a usb stick, write an ISO from some old laptop, etc). That provided enough friction to stop the impulse to procrastinate, and enough time to stop and realise I actually can't "just check something real quick", I'll always end up moving from distraction to distraction for hours on end. That's the real issue; the time frame where you actually believe that is short, but long enough to get sucked in.

In other words, and it took me years to realise this, the key cause of procrastination is impulsivity, and impulsivity follows the path of least resistance. So if doing the dishes is actually the easiest thing to start doing, that's also what will come to mind.
I tested my biases, guessing that Nissan cars and Dodge trucks would have the highest due to my driving experiences. Sure enough, both led their respective categories.
Or they are holding the details of their process close to their chest, in anticipation of a lucrative spin-off.
no cap
https://support.google.com/chrome/a/answer/6220366?hl=en is the program in question.

> These updates depend on many device specific non-Google hardware and software providers that work with Google to provide the highest level of security and stability support. For this reason, older Chrome devices cannot receive updates indefinitely to enable new OS and browser features. For this reason, older Chrome devices cannot receive updates indefinitely to enable new OS and browser features.

https://support.google.com/chromebook/answer/9367166?hl=en confirms that security updates are also discontinued after the AUE date.

By contrast, Microsoft supported security updates for Windows 7, across all the hardware supporting it, from its release in 2009 all the way through early 2020. A five-year AUE, less than many students' times in post-secondary education, is comparatively user-hostile - and downright dangerous from a security perspective.
Despite tech jobs being much better than 18th century coal mining, I think it might do us some good to pick up Zola's Germinal and remind ourselves that wholly attaching one's life to a corporation generally doesn't work out in our favor.
The x86 version of xv6 is no longer updated, the last updates took place about 7 years ago. Current xv6 supports RISC V in qemu, there are also ports to real RISC V devices (Kendryte/Canaan K210 by Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Allwinner D1 and StarFive JH7110 by me) and FPGA implementations (by Michael Schröder).

https://github.com/mit-pdos/xv6-riscv/ (qemu)

https://github.com/HUST-OS/xv6-k210 (K210)

https://github.com/michaelengel/xv6-d1 (Allwinner D1)

https://github.com/michaelengel/xv6-vf2 (JH7110)

https://gitlab.com/x653/xv6-riscv-fpga (RV32 FPGA)
If they're charging that little, there's some sort of massive caveat involved (I'm guessing there's a massive "cleaning fee"). That would be cheap for rent, never mind temporary accommodation.
"room temperature" is 20 degrees above that.
You don't think they're talking about the sharepoint.com URL?
>I do enjoy giving short reviews for books that call for them

When I was in school, we called these book reports, and I'm pretty sure a number closer to 0 actually enjoyed them the least of which was me.
In practice you will need some extra state, for example the RISC-V program counter and the x86 stack, so it's not really possible to map registers 1:1. Also some instructions on x86 need extra registers, or they can only refer to fixed registers (e.g. EAX and EDX for multiply-high).
but you are still not entitled to anyone's source code unless you are a user of the program.

do you want to pay RH's contract and distribute their code for free? well, find someone to host a VPS that will receive petabytes of traffic each month then.

you will soon find out, it's really not that "free"
I think there's important learning in this that I wish all leaders of militarily powerful nations understood. When engaging in war, the one certainty for all sides is that it will be a tragedy. Even if you "win", there will be horrible consequences (on your own side!) in terms of lives lost, lives irreparably damaged, money / resources lost, and any moral/ethical high ground. In anything of any scale, this can't be avoided.

Therefore, the choice to go to war is only sane if not going to war would be an even bigger tragedy. It's not hard to argue that Hitler taking over Europe (and beyond) would be worse.

When viewed in this light, Russia going into Ukraine, the US going into Iraq twice, the US going into Vietnam, etc. all look like pretty bad decisions. But we keep falling into this complacency that the next war will be an easy one or a clean one. It will not, that is not what war is.
I keep looking for alternatives but there always seem to be negative tradeoffs. I've asked in a comment elsewhere in this post about Gravity payments but not getting any responses. So I keep hoping.
>Money for me not for thee.

Don't you think any company would object to having a real money storefront in their game that they have no control over.

In the tweet valve isn't complaining that moders make money, but that they are selling items specifically.
That's true, I did upgrade from a 3-4 year old DOCSIS 3.0 Surfboard to a 3.1 Surfboard at the same time. I didn't run any metrics to see what actual bandwidth usage was, I was just waiting for symmetric gig fiber at the time.
I don't think the game is in data. Facebook has so many eyeballs that it's basically the cheapest place to buy ads. They give me mostly irrelevant ads, but there's so many that I have bought something off there.

Goodreads's purpose is to encourage people to read more books, or get excited to buy books they don't read, which benefits the world's largest bookstore, Amazon.

Google doesn't need data to sell you something. It just sells you whatever you type in the box.
The Cinematronics system had two Z80’s, and one had faster access to the video memory than the other. The two had separate EPROM banks as well.
A Google Maps Car Got into a Police Chase, and We Want to See That Street View
Which GPU is capable of all that? And which do you have a write up for this?
Yeah, well, good luck convincing most manager I know to plan for a phase whose outputs get tossed away. They would really much rather the prototype code gets merged, and then just work. Not to mention the fact they never let you "do things more properly", if they can help it, because you are again wasting precious time which could be used to do other work from the ever-growing backlog.

As for my own projects - if I both "write things more properly" and divide them into small parts, it's easier to just keep the code I wrote for doing whatever it is I had it do; and maybe at some point collect enough of that to make a library, or at least a reusable header.
I would imagine that most people use nonzero temperature, so they won't need to look for any explanation for non-determinism.
YouTube deletes account over Bitcoin comments
Yes, that. Thanks.
Have you tried holoviews with datashader?

https://holoviews.org/user_guide/Large_Data.html
Not sure that level of absolute is the way to go.

If you build a prototype and happen to nail it then why not iterate?

Or perhaps you wrote a prototype and specific components/module feel sound?

Authors suggestion feels sound as a question you should ask yourself & seriously consider, more than a strict principle.
Using boxes is great! The beauty of coding is that those boxes don't need to be discarded, we have the virtual power to transmute them into real chairs and tables via the power of refactoring. It's like Photoshop vs. watercolor. I'm going to sketch either way, it's just a matter of what the bar is for throwing it all out, and I think it's very often sufficient to decide in the moment in a virtual environment. That's all to say, going back to my first point, I don't need to decide ahead of time whether the code will be kept, I'm going to keep it loose either way.

And there are situations I'd go in assuming I'll probably rewrite the work, but I wouldn't set the criteria so broadly as to cover literally whatever the next large project I embark on will be, as the article suggests.
Yes, let’s make everything illegal, so you have to pay somebody to give a prescription to you any time you need anything. Somebody else always knows better what is good for you! Especially it will help poor people, which already shop at veterinary stores instead of pharmacies.
There's an American show which is similar to what gp describes:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_and_Afraid
Unlock and install LineageOS or one of other alternatives.

Good resource: https://github.com/phhusson/treble_experimentations/wiki
Great example of GPT outputting a lot of words that completely fails to answer the posed question.
> I don't know why some people consider artificial intelligence rivalling and surpassing humans more dangerous than rocks with useful conductive properties.

The person who had this thought should stop having more.
I considered Ramda at my last company for a hot minute, but ultimately decided it was too opaque to be a reasonable decision. We ended up using lodash for a little while, but in reality used like 2% of lodash, so I ripped it entirely out in favor of our own small utility collection with really sound typescript typing.

I think, in any project, it’s best to repeat yourself more, and patiently watch to see which abstractions actually emerge.
I just spent 30 minutes toggling through the filters and can confirm this, along with my own similar experiences.

Trucks don't seem much safer for occupants, while being much worse than expected for other parties.
So your complaining that this story is inappropriate for HN is really just because you don't agree with making fun of AI doomers?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37006515
I get 250mbs down, and outside of a massive Steam game, I am not sure what I would do with more.
Finding meaning in The Nature of Order
I can type just as fast (if not faster) on my phone as on desktop. I write almost all my HN comments from my phone, primarily because it's my leisure device and I try to use my desktop only for work (or at least "work") activities. My phone has a high DPI screen and a responsive touch interface that makes it easy to browse content and write comments. The main downside is that it's more immersive and usually can't display as much content on the screen as a desktop monitor, but for this I mostly blame responsive design and its tendency to favor single-column text rendering; reading sites in desktop mode on a high DPI phone screen actually isn't too bad, aside from the tiny buttons and links. But the reason this is a major downside is that it encourages doomscrolling as the screen typically only displays one "piece" of content at a time.
As an insomniac I am jealous. I take prescription medication for it but nothing I've tried (both prescribed and over the counter) has ever been very restful.
If AI becomes cheaper than human labor, humans laborers across the globe will lose all of their power and leverage. A “pause” might not be a realistic solution, but this kind of parody isn’t any more helpful than climate change denial.
> The Venus flytrap is one of a very small group of plants that are capable of rapid movement.
This is a disastrous situation in terms of e-waste, if we consider how long laptops can survive when using a reasonable software stack.

With most Linux setups, web browsing on extremely JS-heavy websites is the only area where you might feel considerable differences between a new laptop and one from 7-10 years ago.
If you know where Google's office is, ya, there isn't any hotels nearby. You would probably have to trudge out to across El Camino, better have a rental car!

Definitely nothing nearby at $99/night...maybe East Palo Alto?
> There's no solving this problem because it is fundamentally human in nature. The egos are invested in the existing thing -- so improving the proof-of-concept-that-is-now-hastily-shoved-into-production problem requires that you unravel every person's thoughts and pride on the current thing, regardless of the seriousness of the problem. And so the problem cannot get solved and change cannot happen unless something catastrophic occurs.

Maybe. It can be as simple as loss aversion.
As an ML-focused python dev I have never been able to break the habit of REPL-driven development, but I find it works really well for "building code that works" rather than coming up with a tower of abstractions immediately. A typical python development workflow for me is:

* Start with a blank `main` file and proceed linearly down the page, executing as I go.

* Gradually pull out visually awkward chunks of code and put them into functions with no arguments at the top of the file.

* If I need to parameterize them, add those parameters as needed - don't guess at what I might want to change later.

* Embrace duplication - don't unnecessary add loops or abstractions.

* Once the file is ~500 LOC or becomes too dense, start to refactor a bit. Perhaps introduce some loops or some global variables.

* At all times, ensure the script is idempotent - just highlighting the entire page and spamming run should "do what I want" without causing trouble.

* Once the script is started to take shape, it can be time to bring some OO into it - perhaps there is an object or set of objects I want to pass around, I can make a class for that. Perhaps I can start to think about how to make the functionality more "generalized" and accessible to others via a package.

This is literally the only way I've ever found to be productive with green field development. If my first LOC has the word "class" or "def" in it - I am absolutely going to ripping my hair out 12 hours later, guaranteed.
> I've been adamantly against MoE for a set of reasons

Such as?
Nature doesn't need to hedge its position.

The article doesn't deprecate LK-99. The article is about the hype surrounding the announcement and its replication results, mainly, but not exclusively by, amateurs in other fields (who seem to have shown that they can make samples that have unconventional properties, but not necessarily superconducting).

It's worth reading about a previous social media science debacle, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_ano... where the observations of neutrinos being faster than light was eventually debugged to some simple hardware errors and naive analysis.

"After the initial report of apparent superluminal velocities of neutrinos, most physicists in the field were quietly skeptical of the results, but prepared to adopt a wait-and-see approach. Experimental experts were aware of the complexity and difficulty of the measurement, so an extra unrecognized measurement error was still a real possibility, despite the care taken by the OPERA team"
Gotta make sure those g'ddamned pirates don't have enough bandwidth to seed their beloved cable-network-owned TV shows and movies, at the expense of everyone else who could benefit from faster uplink speeds. ;)
> If it's a work trip, it's work expenses

That doesn't probably affect the financials of the hotel though (assuming its financial profit/loss charts are totally independent from google's OpEx)
Yes, I too, was once obese (and currently am overweight again with "modern" BMI stats), but my place of mental health that got me from a BMI of probably 35+ to 23 wasn't my body.

It was my overall view of myself (mentally, spiritually) and I moved my body in line with that mental picture. When people told me I was overweight (nicely) I agreed with them and I worked on it.
Apologies for the confusion. I did not know about this type of setup. I am aware of the oversubscription problem but didn’t know it was being mitigated in any way.

Do you have examples on environments that use PMPs in such a way? And if so, which PMPs? (I’m asking because if I can avoid UPnP and use the other more sane protocols, it’d still be a win)
mitmproxy is great for web dev because you can map any url to any other url transparently. for instance you can test prod front end on your localhost dev backend and vice versa.
> The reason? My #Bitcoin content promotes illegal activities. "Don't hold your own keys" - as that's considered illegal, apparently.

Looks like they learned a valuable lesson about what happens when you give other people the keys, then.
Are we sure that is true? Why would Netflix or similar pay out to give a better picture? Outside of a few AV aficionados, I doubt the average consumer would know or care.
Yep. Any platform run by someone else can kick you off for any reason, any time.

You should consider looking into running discourse, which is a modernized forum software: https://github.com/discourse/discourse

Nice examples of what it looks like:

https://discourse.nixos.org/

https://forum.level1techs.com/

As a bonus, the content and community will be accessible to search engines, so it’s easy to find answers to problems that gave been already been addressed.

In general, consider combining the two, where discourse is the anchor of the community that can’t be yanked out from under you, while discord is the one that sells the data from your players in exchange for free voice and text chat.

It’s also possible to enable logging in with discord credentials https://meta.discourse.org/t/configure-discord-login-for-dis...

As well as pushing content from discord to discourse so it’s not hidden and losable: https://blog.discourse.org/2021/05/discord-and-discourse-bet...
Arabic is popular for business reasons and religious reasons.

Mandarin is popular for business reasons too.

I think a lot of it is local reasons too - foreigners in Thailand who learn Thai.
While combining the word "best with "Terraform" in a sentence is more than likely to result in an oxymoron, it is counter-productive not to attempt to organize and utilize terraform as elegantly and DRY as possible. We interact with stacks (which we call projects typically) via Terragrunt and have a very large surface of modules as we do have a fair amount of infrastructure pieces. But we also try to expose Terraform infrastructure changes by use of Atlantis; though bulky, github does provide a reasonable means to dialogue and manage changes made by multiple teams. The use of modules also helps us encapsulate infrastructure, and state problems are rare with these approaches, but the data sprawl inherent to Terraform is very unwieldy regardless of so called "best" practices. The language features are weak, awkward and directly encourage repetition and specification bloat. We have had some success via Data Sources to export logic outside of Terraform and provide much needed sanity when interacting with very verbose infrastructure such as Lake Formation.
Ask hardware manufacturers where their open source device drivers are