skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Evidence imo that the laws legislators pass mean things, matter, and shouldn't be done without a lot of thinking.

It's also potentially an example of a company bigger and more powerful than small governments. Which could lead to problems, though this doesn't strike me as particularly the scariest one by a long shot.
There is a data point close to zero resistance, but sadly at 230K.
My intent was to breadcrumb enough but I didn't have the availability to search :)
There is lots of data on this. Immigration is also good, we should have a lot more of that too IMO.
Question: unless you are an anti-AI advocate, why does this matter? Why are we raising pitchforks over this? We routinely sign terms that allow product managers to analyze how we use a product and even use data for aggregation of trends.

Yes, an opt out would be nice, but what bad outcome for anyone personally comes of this?
The easiest wya to make this happen is to just write

(1997)

as the entire comment. Dang will usually edit the title whenever he notices that.
And the others haven't been reported because....?
Unfortunately in America it is very difficult to sue or otherwise obtain redress of grievance when the perpetrator of an act is a police officer. It is almost certainly easier to sue the company to stop the software's use than sue the police to stop them from using it.
The usual approximation is the 3rd or 4th power of weight, not exponential.

But yeah, growing taxes on that proportion would make sense.
She's sneering at a bunch of schlubs and you're calling me the uncharitable one? You can frame this kind of stuff as therapy if you want, as something involving a pathetic kind of dignity, even as valuable work, but her essay does none of that. The only people with whom she evinces any solidarity are the convenience-store clerks and the taxi drivers. She basically says that this is not a good thing to be doing, which paradoxically means that her essay is in more logical agreement with my own condemnation of it than it is with your post. If there is to be an end to judgment and condemnation it has to begin with the author. She and I agree that exploitation is happening; we only disagree about whether it is good (or, "radical", she says). The catharsis you speak of, if real, is not something she cares about, because the people who experience it are not people she values.
So it's a fear for generative AI specifically. Because there are other AI training examples without this concern present.
Well, by we I did mean HN people.
I'm Canadian and I suspect our problem is that we're approaching this in earnest, not realizing that the Australian law was a shakedown and made no sense from an earnest perspective.

We were advised by Australia's top policy wonk, but maybe he was in earnest and didn't understand the game he was in.
Position in the production hierarchy.

Consider a person that carves bespoke wooden figurines. Their job takes considerable skill, even talent. But it takes then X hours to make Y figurines. Time in, widgets out, completely proportional.

Now imagine a person that configures a robot to carve crappy mass produced figurines. Their work is differently skilled, but perhaps less so. The product isn't as good. Yet they put in their time once and the machine cranks out enormous quantities with minimal additional work from them. This has high leverage, they can command more pay because their leveraged work has more value.

You can go further up the hierarchy, to the people who organize or direct the technicians or the channels that distribute the products of their machines. Their work is further abstracted, skilled in its own way but not necessarily more so. But the amount of income their efforts command is greater still-- even more leveraged.

In areas where the use of the high-skill low-leverage work are largely optional-- say custom carpentry-- they often become unavailable because the sort of highly competent people who would excel at these tasks can make more money in a highly leveraged (but perhaps less skilled!) job writing boilerplate javascript to deliver advertising or whatever. In areas where the non-scalable work isn't optional, like medical doctors-- the prices tend to shoot through the sky in part due to the income an equivalent aptitude could command in a more leveraged position.

In between the two extremes we have workers that are just flat underpaid, and we rationalize the situation by imagining that they're less deserving.

As the article points out, many of these lowly paid jobs are highly skilled in their own way-- at least if done well. What they don't have, however, is a big initial training barrier to entry that limits the supply of capable people and puts market power for this labor onto the supply side.

Skill isn't a factor in wages except in so far as the required skill impacts the level of supply or demand in the supply/demand balance.

I think we often underestimate the capability of the average person because we can't know the average person and can't see first hand the depth of their ability and because we also so often put that average person in a situation that just doesn't exercise those latent abilities (or do, but do so in ways we don't respect due to cultural biases).
A left-inclined publication wants more government interference and more taxes? I'm shocked!

How about just not taxing everything and everyone into oblivion? Reduce all the wasteful government spending, and remove most of the government.
> In 2000, Jimmy Fallon performed in blackface on Saturday Night Live, imitating former cast member Chris Rock.

> Jimmy Kimmel donned black paint over his body and used an exaggerated, accented voice to portray NBA player Karl Malone on The Man Show in 2003.

> In 2007, Sarah Silverman performed in blackface for a skit from The Sarah Silverman Program.

I don't think many people really realized blackface was problematic until sometime after 2007. Twitter started in 2006, so I imagine awareness improved in part due to twitter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackface
True - I've done both over the years, in the field and coding geophysical aquisition aquisition, processing, visualisation, and interpretation.

Still hard to pass up a chance to pile on the downsides of the slog work :)
The media actual controls the summaries seen. They purposefully made large, enticing summaries in order to encourage clicks! They are free to write any summary they want.
> Absent government action, there is a thing I would be free to do: buy a car without seatbelts

You are entirely free to buy cars without seatbelts.

It's the manufacturers who are prevented from selling cars without seatbelts, nor headlights below a certain height, nor unsafe chinesium non-DOT-legal tires. Hell, aren't backup cameras required on new cars sold in the US now?

And I'm pretty sure if a manufacturer sold you a car without seat belts, you could buy it, and it would be the manufacturers problem you could force them to correct at no cost.

But you'd be breaking the law driving it around without wearing seat belts, which is the part of all this I take issue with.
Hm. Looks like it's just giving you quick access to tools that already exist in windows.
This is why I always bounce hard off RPGs yet love immersive sims with RPG-elements. Traditional CRPGs feel so hostile to players new to the genre, or those without a lot of free time. I would think difficulty sliders could help, though not sure if that's seen as sacrilegious or something.
This problem will take care of itself once EVs are no longer a Luxury Good. I'd rather not do a bunch of damage to a fledgling market when all I want is more choices and innovation in charging times.
Why is this still hosted on .edu?
Huh? The bay is the most racist place I’ve ever lived. For a supposedly “diverse” region everyone seems to self-segregate (compared to SoCal, for example).

As for FAANG and what not, the hate is understandable. It’s like building McMansions in historical neighborhoods.
This one is insane!
I've literally only ever seen him mentioned for the sake of ridiculing him. I'm sure some followers of him exist just as I'm sure some neo-nazis exist, but is it anything other than a tiny fringe of irrelevant weirdos?
These media companies who want Meta to pay them for content sure seem to post an awful lot of content on Meta properties for free, seemingly on purpose.
I just got done reading a book called "Shareware Heroes" that mentioned various shareware apps providing source code to users who registered. The free versions never had source provided; the source was advertised as a perk for paid users. It's different than what we expect today, but honestly not the worst business model out there.
https://archive.is/tADVR
Natelson: ...I get nervous that people who know nothing about high-temperature solid-state-materials synthesis are trying to cook this stuff up on their stove. I’m just worried you could hurt yourself.

Nyce: “Don’t do it.” Is that your official recommendation?

Natelson: My official recommendation is “Don’t try this at home,” yeah.

---

I really don't understand that attitude - what is so risky about attempting to make LK99? Surely people who'd attempt this sort of thing would know not to ingest lead, touch hot things, cut themselves on sharp edges.
How much damage does a 7,000 lb vehicle do to a road designed for 80,000 lb?

Or is the real measure ground pressure? Apparently semi trucks run 6000lb up front per wheel and 4300lb in the rear. The Rivian runs 1400lb.

With asphalt, which is softer, I imagine the road damage more readily accumulates over time. Whereas the concrete on freeways I guess has an actual sheer strength and either breaks or it doesn’t.

I am neither a mechanical nor civil engineer, so just curious how the wear manifests.
I wish a Simple Spanish. We have pedantic people who blame about these kind of ideas.
That these kinds of financial activity were not as massively rewarded as they are today.
Why do you and others on the thread keep asking that. If a human made a mistake he or she is held accountable individually and punished. The software cannot be punished, it does not have the ability to fear punishment and be perfectly careful.

The point you are missing is that the software isn't augmenting human responsibility, it is largley replacing it. Even if not on paper, humans now have an excuse to lay responsibility on the software.

This is the same problem I have with ML and my work, if I have to triple check its output anyways then what good is it? If I don't, who will take responsibility for the mistake?

Even if humans made more errors, you can tune humans by adjusting their incentives. For example, if they faced a couple of years of jail time would humans keep the same amount of error rate?

The proper use of such software is to narrow down the list of suspects, humans then have to do much more vetting and verification, assuming the software's results are false before concluding the identification.

The time saved scouring through a large list of suspects should be spent painstakingly vetting and independently corroborating software identified hits.

There is no replacement for humans doing the actual/final identification and assuming the responsibility if their mistakes.
False. Australia is the example often cited, but Australia caved and elected not to apply the law to Google and Facebook. Instead, Facebook and Google made deals outside of the law.

These deals were surely larger than their earlier deals, but small enough they could live with them. The terms were never published.

Seeing how misperception of this led directly to the Canadian law, my suspicion is Meta is now done with the charade lest others copy it, and will keep news out unless the law is repealed.

There are, to my knowledge, zero countries where Meta engaged in a forced negotiation framework such as the Canadian law. If you disagree, could you please name one?
It’s just to your untrained eyes that they look “more similar”. No, all Asians do not look alike. Also, contrary to popular belief, they do age. And blacks do “crack”. They just have different patterns of progressions, and your brain is not trained to notice the nuances.
Just ask for no rice.
Warships from Joint Russian/Chinese Patrol Near Alaska
But in some way we all end up in the same place :) (HN)

I really enjoyed the labs and it was seeing the predictions pan out in front of my eyes that actually got me interested in the first place. But you have to know what your getting into. The labs are extremely time consuming and required preparation.
> honestly how do you convince the money to invest in something like, besides the trend of copying BG3 simply due to success?

you cannot. The money is interested in making more money. Good art may, or may not make money - and that's because the goal of the artist(s) aren't aligned with making money. It just so happens that it _could_ make money, and thus that became the pitch to investors.

If given the chance (imagine an unlimited UBI for example), the same artists would make such a game without investors (and might make an even better one...).
Why? I get the spec being incomplete because 0/0 isn't mentioned but dividing zero? What is undefined about it?
The Nomad can quit at any time, the Hobo can't.
> The darkly humorous "A (de)motivational letter"

It's not just darkly humorous, it could almost be satire:

> It has to the the kind of chemistry that people read and then jizz in their pants, they’re so excited about it. That’s right: we only do jizz-worthy chemistry

I'll assume due to the nature of chemistry, the field doesn't suffer as much from non-reproducible data, but overall, this sentence alone might explain cases like the Francesca Gino fraud [0], or why the head of Stanford resigned over integrity issues [1]? Or the Schön scandal? [2]

I mean take the analogy seriously for a moment: What the author is asking for in the analogie's universe, is for one of his students to just invent Stable Diffusion so he can generate pornography for his colleagues to.. well?

But no word about integrity or honesty. Nothing. Just results.

Author took it as inspiration:

> The truth is that under all the profanities, and the slave-driver mentality of the professor I saw someone who truly wanted to develop their students.

PhD students of HN enlighten me, after reading this crap, how is this "slave-driver" not just incentivizing to cheat?

[0]https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2023/08/gino-ari...
[1]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/19/stanford-pre...
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch%C3%B6n_scandal
Same experience when I was a kid. I fell and had a milk teeth that was completely lose. The dentist just said to leave it as is.

It fixed itself as well.
But that's what came up in their Facebook feed so that's the truth they know.
I moved to Vegas, both cities have a great assortment of amazing foods.
I'm not even sure a person could survive being in a magnetic field that strong. Motion of blood through the field would generate electric currents in the brain and heart (and elsewhere).
This illustrates a serious problem with AI. We (Humans) are ceding our autonomy to AI without any evidence of the validity of the outcomes. The industry puts up a front saying they will be careful, but the reality is that they are faking it until they make it. Techies want to fix the problem by adding more data points or tweaking the algos, but the real fix will take actual structural societal changes which is time consuming and expensive. Technology alone will not fix this.
And what do you think would happen then?
America is not a nation of light vehicles, and that is largely due to the MPG standards that have been legislated for decades. An "out" was given based on vehicle weight, with heavier vehicles not having to meet as high a standard as lighter ones. Which is part of why trucks have gotten so huge over the past few decades.
> Isn't road wear non-linear, with heavy vehicles doing disproportionate damage compared to lighter ones?

This is correct, and it's why your conclusion is nonsensical.

No one is subsidizing luxury toys. The amount of damage done to roads by an e-Hummer or Rivian is mildly above that of, say, a Camry. Both do hundreds of times less damage than an 18-wheeler. The amount of damage done to a road by a passenger sedan is functionally zero, and for a Rivian or Hummer, it remains essentially zero.

The weight of large electric vehicles is an important issue! It makes a huge difference in cases of, for example, striking a pedestrian. But road damage is not a major issue for electric vehicles.

One caveat would be that a lot of road repair is funded via gas taxes, so road damage per dollar paid towards road repair may be lower for electric vehicles. But if we make heavy vehicles pair "their fair share", the Rivians will pay pennies, and the truckers will all go bankrupt.
A /128 on the WAN is normal. Addresses assigned by DHCPv6 (which is commonly used by ISPs for WAN address assignment) are assigned as /128.

The important part is the delegated prefix, which you normally get via DHCPv6-PD and should be at least a /56.
That may be because when something like Epic or PACS (or other tier 1 systems, or the network/data center/power/etc) is down longer than X time the hospital will go into diversion, meaning as many ED patients as possible are diverted to a different nearby hospital.

And paper workflows can be fast in the moment but cause absolute chaos for cleaning up, reconciliation, and moving data between departments.

Source: Worked with many hospitals, including ones with Epic.
> If a human made a mistake he or she is held accountable individually and punished.

Is she?
>If a human made a mistake he or she is held accountable individually and punished.

Really? I am not so sure about that. Who'd get punished for misidentifying a face in book, say, of faces?
This I've heard several times recently but it's not really true. The current 4-door Bronco is larger in every direction and 900 pounds heavier than a 1976 Ramcharger, which we used to think of as a benchmark for way-too-big cars. The best-selling car from 1976 weighed 3700 pounds, only 3-5% more than the best-selling Toyota Camry of 2022. The 1976 Ford F-100 (the best-selling truck of that year) base weight is the same as a 2023 Ford F-150 base, at 4000 pounds.
If you're seriously asking for my recommendation, as if that wasn't already apparent to the meanest intellect, then I would strongly suggest you look to the raw data and read informed papers on the aquisition and interpretation.

All 'news' papers, especially those that are heavily political and editorially biased (Murdoch's media empire, for example), will shape for eyeballs and reduce to the lowest common denominator.

You can see that I chose to go directly to an overview on the Global Fire Emissions Database and chose to quote directly from there.

The trite bite "Fires are actually decreasing." is meaningless sans context.
LA county is massive. SF is tiny. The rest of the bay offers much more than LA. You just need to look around.

I doubt I can move back again. I tried once and the food was just terrible in contrast.
A simple downvote would suffice as well.
Thank you so much. This is really helpful, genuinely.
The page says it is electromechanical:

> [The hammers etc.] sit on the center spine and are activated by solenoids, a proven technology even used on some Spirio Steinways.

I don't know much about pianos but it struck me that they were looking at their shoes when they wrote that.
I wouldn’t say it’s significant. Good tools can make your life easier, but you reach diminishing returns very quickly. I used rather crappy kitchen tools for probably my first 10 years of home cooking, and didn’t have any big increase in productivity when I started spending more money on them, and wasn’t held back by them at any point prior to that. I got a decent boost from buying a nice stand mixer, but I only use that for cakes and leavened bread, which I don’t cook that much of.
In the last five years, it’s gotten a lot better. But I could see before then things are still pretty bad even with epic.
Nope, in space/low grav you would still have the friction between the water molecules. Additionally, in space/low grav the water would want to clump.
Industry doesn't need peer review. The proof of the pudding is in the sales.
https://archive.vn/z5zYl
Haha wow this is a great post. I am a lawyer and you may have solved a problem I recently encountered. So you think this is saying that generic language in the Zoom BAA constitutes permission to de-identify?

Are there examples of healthcare ai chatbots trained on de-id data btw? If you're familiar would love to see.

What's your line of work out of curiosity?
Don't use this, it has a lot of riskware as part of the toolset. Win10/11 has ok-ish backup/restore with a nice UI. Better to use that than shove all this mess in there.

FYI: if you insist, use MRT not any of these risky security softwares. But if you insist, malwarebytes is the only one i would ever get near.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=990...
I partially agree with you.

Docker Compose is still a moving project. Look at the version of the schema. It evolves.

Kubernetes is also a platform that is moving. And it is moving fast.

If Kompose was considered `done` by its authors in 2020, I don't think I would even bother trying it out. It probably wouldn't be able to parse recent Docker Compose schemas and it would probably output outdated Kubernetes manifests.

But, see, yesterday I was looking for a Time Boxing application and stumbled on that one: https://github.com/khrykin/StrategrDesktop/. I dismissed it because the last release was in 2020. But that is an example of an app that could be considered `done` and still useful 3 years later.

Hence why I partially agree with you. :)
> Is there ever an instance of this happening?

your question betrays a level of callousness unworthy of a human being

> the issue veers into ptsd/trauma territory if one somehow finds themselves incapable of feeding themselves

yes, that is one of the numerous psychological disorders that can give rise to such serious levels of dysfunction due to anxiety

there are innumerable cases of people dying as a result, including many famous ones, like kurt goedel
Apparently my device is in orbit :)
I've considered using lies to detect lies. Go to a dentist and lie to them about a particular tooth sometimes being sore. If they tell you there's nothing wrong with it, that's your new dentist.
This is the microcosm of the biggest problem facing humanity

Of course this is the result, because our society can only create data that is embedded with our personal and social structural biases and fears.

There is no way to possibly align artificial intelligence because we are only demonstrating anti-social biased actions via the data we create, it’s just a simple fact, there’s no way around it, there’s no pathway to fix it;

As long as we are a selfish antisocial society, creating antisocial data, we’re going to make antisocial biased machines
That's pretty funny because every time I've interacted with a stomach doctor, it pretty much went from introducing themselves to the patient (one time myself) to "let's get you scheduled for an EGD and/or a colonoscopy!"

That's with 3 different people and a handful of different doctors. They are actually pretty eager to look inside your stomach out here heheh. I'm really sorry to hear that happened to your friend though! I hope they're doing better now!
Ah, the famous user request: “it’s simple, just add X”

Followed by: “any update on X?”
TSMC Accelerates Expansion of Advanced Packaging Facilities: Report