skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m also European and subscribe to Kagi. One feature I really like is that I can specifically make a local search by adding a bang with the country, like !fr or !es.
There's really not much to it in this "article".

But I do have a thought about it, I think one of the reasons Apple is so interested in local-device AI is simply because they've done the math and to have a cloud-ai for the iPhone would probably be really expensive for them. Unlike Google or Microsoft or even Amazon, Apple doesn't really have the cloud infrastructure to afford to run these mega-expensive AI models to the quality people would be expecting.

So it seems to me like a local solution that might be more tailored made and probably not as good but good enough given the lower resolution at a higher focus... it might be the most reasonable way for Apple to proceed :) I think this is smart of them, in reality, I don't think there's as much rush for them as there is for other companies in tech to incorporate AI into their product lines.
Figured it out! I had LSP configured to use the two lit typescript-ls plugins but because I was using web-mode, that language-server was never kicking in. Going to try getting treesitter to do the highlighting and then hopefully LSP will provide some nice-to-haves now.
Fatal grizzly attack renews debate over how many humans are too many
I learned about lazygit recently from it's integration with lazyvim. The nice thing about TUIs is how it works anywhere - if I am doing work on WSL or a remote machine I can use the same tool with no issues!
What has changed in 20 years? Realistically.

When we’re the ClimateGate emails? Do you think the industry got itself together after that?
the answer im expecting [TIC] is your answer., regarding : why do you think journalists, and reporters are so safety conscious ? why do they use pseudonyms?

im actually expecting you to duck the question, with non-interrogative questions
Noted.

Small ask - please consider sharing any issues on KagiFeedback [1] so that we can track and act on it right away.

[1] https://kagifeedback.org
I had once the experience of talking with someone who did a machine learning neural network model, to fit a linear polynomial function. f(x) = mx + b

When I showed my simpler approach they were confused... What do you mean by linear polynomial function?
Edx Course on ChatGPT
:q but always:w
Sucks that SF is decay. But about the title - That's VERY Good!
Humanity and society does not need an occupation identified as a "landlord".

Housing should not be an investment ever.
The "Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty Secret Agent Gear Collection" is basically a collector's edition for the Phantom Liberty expansion, except it doesn't even come with a game code.

https://gear.cdprojektred.com/en-eu/products/cyberpunk-2077-...
When market rates drop, new market rate housing projects stall and die.

They stall and die more quickly than they start as market rates rise.

Because investment syndicates fall apart as anticipated rates of return fall, because bank loans are harder to come by, and because existing revenue streams shrink available funding.

Real estate economics is very unlike widget economics. The amount of land in desirable locations is fixed.
Git has a reputation for having one of the most confusing CLIs ever. However, it's probably better to decide what operations you want to do and work from there to find out the commands needed. That obviates the need to learn so many commands and switches - for me, at least. My training material was also designed like that. My students use them like cheat-sheets until they get familiar enough.
readline vi mode, vimperator and pentadactyle are a testimony
And famously succeeded.
This is just wrong, it has no external goals, it just predicts next tokens or behaves in some other way that has minimized a training loss. It doesn't matter what you "plug it in to", it will just do what you tell it. You could speculate there might be instructions that lead to emergent behavior, but then your back to just speculating about how AI might work. Current llms don't work the way you're implying.
> I don’t mean to start a holy war but this is why people buy consoles [...] A PS5 or Xbox Series X is $499 and is a fully functioning device.

How much do the console games cost? PC and console gamers tend to spend more on games than hardware, and PC games are offer more bang for the buck when amortized over playable time. Additionally, consoles are not backwards compatible with games for earlier platforms, so one has to re-buy versions of games they already own.

Consoles are appliances, and I understand the appeal of their simplicity. However, until consoles offer the flexibility of playing a game I bought 10 years ago[1] or the latest and greatest AAA title, I can't abandon PC gaming.

1. Or a 10-year old title on sale for $3.99
1] less cars

2] get cars our of cities (see Amsterdam, for example)

3] smaller cars

Smaller cars hit your legs and throw you over the car.

SUVs/trucks hit you in the chest, and drag you under the car.
https://twitter.com/hankgreen/status/1687535525169930241

I feel like you’re the kinda guy who needs to hear a credible fellow like ‘Hank Green’ say what I’m trying say to understand.

I don’t want or have time to write fully researched opines. On message boards you will find comments are speaking to something true but are not well researched because of the inherent format and time commitment of the writer.

There is a great deal of Alpha online and not everyone is going to give you 5 bullet points with all the articles backing up their position. You’ll miss out on correct angles if it takes you a book report to realize the book is good.

‘No one sensible could have predicted this’

There are lots of smart people beside yourself who see things you don’t, abs make great sums of money on their guesses. They don’t need to convince you to care when you seem more motivated to find out why you shouldn’t
Communists were quite anti-intellectual. Literally against intelligentsia
what is this now, a quadruple negative?

It is untrue that they have no idea if the "solutions" we try won't lead to worse outcomes

It is true that they have some idea that the "solutions" we try won't lead to worse outcomes

It is true that they have some idea that the "solutions" we try will lead to better outcomes.

I think the nuance needed here is: what do we mean by "better outcomes?" It's reasonable to believe that it will help lower temperatures. But is that an "outcome" in and of itself?

If we consider the "outcome" to also include the second and third order effects, I'd like to understand how anyone could be certain that it will be better.
It’s not really a dupe if it’s worth reading separate accounts of Brams impact. And I would say it is.
no things inside slots keep the styling from the outside
Where you work primarily depends on what you do. If you're a labourer then you may have to work on scaffolding. If you're a bin man you may have to work on a garbage truck. If you don't like this or feel working in these conditions is bad for your mental health, then you may be in the wrong line of work.

Some jobs (like software engineering) can be slightly more flexible. You'll probably need to work at a desk behind a computer screen all day, but where that desk is located, might not be so important depending on the exact nature of your work. If you don't like working at a desk behind a computer screen all day and believe this is bad for your mental health, then you may be in the wrong line of work.

We should remember that regardless of whether we're working remotely there's a lot about the nature of our work that is simply determined by the specifics of our jobs. I must work 5 days a week on a desk behind a screen if I want to be software engineer (like it or not). I'd argue this in my case this far worse for my health than whether that screen is in an office with colleagues or in my house with my family.

If people feel that remote work isn't for them then I think that's fine, but I also think they should just look for companies that are happy for them to work in-office or work hybrid. One of the nice things about remote work is that generally there are other companies out there (if not your own company) that will allow you to work from the office if you choose. When you compare this to people who are forced to work on roofs in the rain, or forced to work under cars in a car garage, or forced to sit behind a stirring wheel for hours in trucks, I think this hysteria about remote work being so "bad" speaks more to the privilege that middle-class white collar workers have. Although I don't want to dismiss anyone's individual struggles.

Again, I've worked mostly remote for decade and in my case it's been lovely. I get to spend loads of time with my partner and we've been able to take 1-2 month trips abroad a few times because I can work while we're away.

Even if you don't like or agree with remote work for yourself what we should all be in favour of is more choice in the labour market, and remote work for this reason should be celebrated instead of repeatedly bashed in the media for not always maximising worker productivity, and occasionally making people feel lonely.

Remote work is a good thing. Not because it's good for everyone, but because it's good for some people. If you struggle to mentally cope with working from your home, you may find most other places of work to be quite rough on your mental health too. I suspect in many cases this may speak more to things going on in your personal life than an issue with your workplace. Maybe the real issue here is that it's not healthy for us to live alone and in recent decades with we've replaced family life with work and with neither some people feel lost.
We are gradually rolling out more search assistant features, a large update is coming very soon.

And you can already use many advanced AI features like the ability to summarize results directly in Kagi interface [1].

This is also available as a stand-alone app for example here is the summary of this HN discussion [2].

[1] https://help.kagi.com/kagi/ai/summarize-page.html

[2] https://kagi.com/summarizer/index.html?url=https://news.ycom...
> No it doesn't, because it's not a sphere. The dome is specifically designed so that it takes finite time.

Can you explain why?
What other arbitrary rules about investments do you have?
-Wl,--import-symbols -Wl,--export-all-symbols -Wl,--entry= (or rather -mexec-model=reactor).
I google for world primary energy use. You’re right that electrification reduces primary energy use. That’s of course true for coal and gas as well.
Rentals yeah, but not the ones you own.
Anything with started with "the myth" arguing about something that is at the limits of knowledge without a clear answer is unavoidably biased by a person with big ego.
As someone dealing with elder care of multiple family members I also believe mental anguish caused by medical environments, including insurance and billing in the US, and the dismissiveness of hospice care (you’re taking too long to die, speed it up or transition to a lower form of care) doesn’t help the matter.

Modern medicine is a miracle but struggles to evolve beyond many immediate hurdles. In an extreme minority of cases it can be better to avoid traditional intake methods.
One recommendation for Kagi is to also introduce region based pricing. I subscribed, but in my country, the base price is probably too much for most people (that said I doubt the mentality here would increase sales for you so it is not quite a no-brainer).
I think you mean ^A
Put aside for a bit that ChatGPT is or isn’t AI-

It is pretty good at what it does. Why can’t people just appreciate that?

I have found it really good at brainstorming, generating code, outlining, rephrasing on command various text, etc.
Hoping I’m not too late to head off the usual confusion: this is an interesting result in philosophy of physics, not in physics.

We already know that classical mechanics is non-physical. This result (and others) show that it is not even internally consistent— that is, you shouldn’t need any empirical evidence to know that there’s something else going on.

That’s interesting to philosophers and historians, but since you and I already know empirically that it’s non-physical, it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.

Anyway, if you enjoyed learning about the dome, you may also look up the lesser-known “space invaders”, in which arbitrary objects can appear at infinity, with infinite velocity, and then be brought to rest at any time T. But again, don’t look for reasons that doesn’t actually happen— it means the theory is wrong.
Yes but there is a limit given the fixed number of operations the model has and the order it needs to solve them, for example 99+1= will need to give 1 as token output and to do that the model needs to solve all the carries in one go.
Personally I just don't think Ramda fits really well with JavaScript's mutable and often object-oriented nature. It goes against the grain too much for my taste, and it doesn't work very well with Typescript.

In a professional setting I will probably always reach for Lodash due to it's maturity and mindshare. Personally, though, I really prefer Remeda (https://github.com/remeda/remeda) as a pragmatic and flexible API.
There are however ways to make cars hit pedestrians less.
When can we put the "don't rewrite old code" myth to rest? People cite Joel's essay in many situations where it can be reasonably believed to be applicable, but they also cite to people who are in a much better position to determine whether it is applicable.

I've had to inherit a couple of troubled Go codebases with a lot of bugs, to the point of near-constant outages and functional incorrectness problems attributable to many different causes all throughout the codebase.

One of them was amateur work with zero tests or docs, but it was only about 10k lines of well-delineated components I could understand and rewrite one by one. The end result was effectively a total rewrite, but as Joel suggested, I always had a shippable version at any given moment.

One project was "professional" work with tons of structure and tests, but it was 70k lines for what should have been at most 15k. Worse, it wasn't delineated at all in practice; every component depended on everything else in fine detail. Even the many "interfaces" that were defined were always circumvented by various means anyway, including in tons of copy-paste unit tests that barely caught any bugs but took hours to update when trying to fix the bugs they didn't catch. This was a total writeoff and replacing it with 15k lines took less time than fixing some individual bugs in the original code.

It wasn't "Real-world code evolves to fits its niche, and as it does so, it becomes more complex and harder to understand". Sometimes people do write code more complicated and fragile than it needs to be, and often the people that do that also fail to refactor it later. The more stakes they've loaded onto their rickety mess, the harder it is to justify the risk of maintaining it, even if the steady state is abysmal.

Despite both being Go -- a language praised for its maintainability -- one of them is the kind of project that can be evolved in-place, and the other can barely even be bandaided much less meaningfully evolved. I think everyone who's maintained enough projects has seen a mix of both. People parroting that you should never rewrite either haven't worked on the second kind of project, or are just assuming that it will always be someone else's job to work on that kind of project. Either way I'm not especially persuaded.
good point, and pokes a rather big ol' hole in my comment :)

I don't think we will recognize the AGI's existence until long after it has appeared, and I don't think it will be through the text output of chatGPT10 or whatever. I feel like we'll need to learn to infer AGI's existence because at first our own programming won't be the right way for the AGI to express itself or communicate with us. Kind of like those analogue computers or neural nets that rely on some random unforeseen external factor to work, like local magnetic field or air pressure.

I do agree that there will be endless arguing over whether symptom x, y, or z definitively shows that there's a spark of understanding and self-awareness.
Small towns and countryside means things are far apart.

Let me tell you about tropical nights. I live where temperatures don't drop below 30 at night in summer with 80% humidity. Thank god it's a big city. During the day buildings shade me from sun and because everything is packed it's rarely more than 5 min walking from AC to AC. I would probably die if I had to walk far distances through spreadout town or god forbid countryside without working public transport. Such weather is OK for bicycling however only if landscape very flat. I can compare because I also lived in small towns with similar weather. No thanks.
Sure enough. Which, well, makes sense, since superconductors are "perfect" diamagnets, so them being able to do it seems to necessitate that the greater class of diamagnets on the whole can too.

The only examples I can find of stable non-superconductor diamagnets involved 4+ magnet arrays, though, or multipole magnets, e.g. https://phys.org/news/2014-08-diamagnetic-levitation-pyrolit... and not dipole configurations like this video seems to show.
Not OP, but probably that "fulfilling basic human needs shouldn't be for profit"

I'm a colossal fan of co-ops and credit unions for this reason.
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37013887
So fun! Thank you very much for bringing this up. If I don't forget about it I think I'll make good use of it :)
Not sure it’s an “occupation” for most. I make less than 5% of my monthly living expenses off my rental property and treat my tenants with the care I’d treat my own family.

I’m not sure a few bad actors taking advantage of people warrants statements like, “Housing should not be an investment ever.”
If an exchange tries to squeeze it's participants they can just do a PNI or create their own. An exchange in it's simplest form is just a switch after all.
I don't expect LLMs to be good enough at engineering to trivialize this kind of thing for a while - possibly never, if something else comes along and outcompetes them.
This is already been debunked elsewhere. The sticker as a whole is meant to convey that the user should connect and do setup via Wi-Fi before connecting to it via USB. A sticker designed to hide a USB port would not have a curved arrow icon showing a user where to start peeling it.

To be clear, I'm not saying that HP printers shouldn't be avoided, that the sticker is well-designed, that @netspooky is dumb for not understanding it, etc. It would've been nice if @netspooky took a minute to consult the manual before posting misinformation.
I think they're pretty transparent with their pricing, so I'm not entirely sure they can afford region-based pricing until their own costs go down.
It is indeed a sad and dystopian state of affairs. I only take some comfort in knowing that almost everything that Disney puts out is utter slop
Consider how many pop-sci singularitans think their god in a box could predict the future through mere calculation. Many people do have a naive clockwork-universe model of causality.
Suppose you don't have enough money to buy real estate right now but you have enough to rent an apartment. If you don't want to be homeless, from whom do you acquire a lease?
> Because I did something with my Motorola that you can't do with Apple

I jailbreak Apple devices too. But there’s no way I’m recommending that to a friend as it’s not a sustainable consumer strategy.

Google and Motorola don’t support their devices as well as Apple. It’s great that you have a community solution, but unless I want to play tech support to people, I’m not suggesting devices that require community support just for basic security patches.

Or for editing out privacy invading default functions.
It's called grizzly country for a reason. Anyone who lives or visits there should be aware of the risks and prepare accordingly. There are plenty of warnings all over the place.

If grizzlies were roaming freely in the town square, near schools, and around busy tourist spots, then yes, I'd agree that they need to be controlled. But most people who die in bear attacks do so while engaging in obviously reckless behavior, like hiking alone without proper equipment and without any training on how to use it effectively. We can't make nature safe enough for people like that. Next thing you know, we'll be installing fences atop all the cliffs in the Grand Canyon, just in case someone is stupid enough to fall. Oh, and cut down the trees in Yellowstone, too, in case they fall on a person (or a bear).
Why do you want those needs to go unfulfilled?
Problem is some of those have been cut and re-edited to remove “controversial” content for modern audiences.

Gotta get the old school vintage stuff. VHS, laser discs.
I’m not trying to debate or convince you of the right to or morality of abortion. Going back to your original statement of:

> If we're going by this mindset, then we have to agree that Roe v Wade is perhaps the one of the worst events in all of American history

I strongly disagree with your original assertion that by applying the excess death metric to WWII or the pandemic we consequently have to agree on the applicability to abortion which is, as you have agreed, a morality discussion.

The question of whether abortion represents a tragic loss of human life is an entirely different discussion of morality for which I respect our differing views which need not be reconciled to resolve a debate on the most appropriate statistic to quantify the loss of human life during a pandemic or war as you stated in the original comment I replied to.

In fact, your usage of “unborn” obviates the debate. “Excess deaths” are derived from the population statistic and regardless of whether one believes a fetus has achieved moral personhood or whether abortion is murder we do not count an “unborn” person in the population or birth rate statistics prior to delivery (i.e. since inception the US has never counted a pregnant female as 2 people for census purposes) therefore abortion is not relevant to this statistical measure discussion.
That could still be explained by that example having been part of the training set so it knows how to give the right answer. But there must be more going on than that:

The square root of 232444232 is approximately 15229.

(which is wrong, it is approximately 15246.12)

The sum of 2341347345 and 234823542354 is 237165889699.

Which is the right answer.

So there may be some special casing happening there.
The Reddit thread pointed out that the printer will allow you to do ~20 pages over USB, but then any subsequent print is blocked until you create an account.
I tried to play 3, but it was too dark. Literally and thematically. Torchlight was fun though.
nice defense, but you realize that edit many landlords are not like that at all.. the court system here in Alameda County California has a backlog of a decade+ for extremely abusive landlords
Trust is an extremely fragile thing (he says in a pseudo-intellectual sat-on-the-sofa on-a-rainy-day kind of philosophical whimsy...)
> In the middle of a sea of poverty they live with a homestead with cars,stuff and guns

I cycled across South Africa and stayed many nights with white farmers. (Since the land is fenced off, it’s not easy to just stop and camp. You have to find the road up to the farmhouse and ask the farmer’s permission. It usually results in an invitation to dinner and to sleep in the guest bedroom.) What surprised me is how cash-poor a lot of those farming families were, in spite of their land holdings. Yes, they had a higher standard of living than in the townships, but they seemed of only modest wealth in a general developed-world context. They seemed poor compared to some Johannesburg black elites. Farmers complained that their children had moved away not necessarily due to violence but rather for improved financial prospects.