skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://github.com/timdetering/BaconBytes.StarTrek takes it in a different direction.

2950 PRINT "TORPEDO TRACK:"
2960 LET X=X+X[1]
2970 LET Y=Y+X[2]
2980 IF X<.5 OR X >= 8.5 OR Y<.5 OR Y >= 8.5 THEN 3420
2990 LET V[4]=X
2991 LET V[5]=Y
2992 GOSUB 9000

Becomes...

_2950: Console.WriteLine("TORPEDO TRACK:");
_2960: X = X + _X[1];
_2970: Y = Y + _X[2];
_2980: if (X < .5 || X >= 8.5 || Y < .5 || Y >= 8.5) goto _3420;
_2990: _V[4] = X;
_2991: _V[5] = Y;
_2992: _9000();
Anecdotally, enforcement is a joke for cocaine too. I know several people who use it recreationally, sometimes to slightly disturbing excess, and none have ever been in any legal trouble for it.
> I can't think of any way that making an accommodation wheelchair friendly inconveniences anyway.

Well, I've sacrificed a heck of a lot of great parking spaces to accommodate the differently-abled.

> Why should they have to endure having those epithets hurled at them?

I contest that the mere act of reading or hearing certain words could be construed as a task of "endurance" - one is perfectly free to avoid reading or hearing such things if one finds them overtaxing.

On the other hand, if one chooses to "endure" for a moment, one might realize that the schizophrenic delusions of a madman have little bearing on the exact epithets being "hurled" (hurled where? Nowhere in particular, unless one glows in the dark!)

Sticks and stones... RIP Terry. I also don't mind that he was banned from here though, as much as I'm for unfettered speech, if the person in charge decided they didn't wish to host his, that was their prerogative. Terry certainly had other outlets.
Interesting how fingers are still wrong. In most cases zooming in you see there's some subtle or not so subtle problem. Look at the right hand of the second NSFW pic for example. I know the focus isn't the fingers so maybe it's easier to get away with flaws there.
I want to see what congress knows about David's UAP testimonies, the private ones.
> Only time will tell whether the inevitable evolution of intellectual property law to account for AI tools favors individual artists or large tech corporations.

In the end, its going to be “large tech corporations” vs. “large media corporations”, with both sides citing individual artists (in one case, their users, and in the other, their suppliers) to present the clash of titans as a David vs. Goliath story with themselves cast as David.
Compare this to EMS, where unless you're lucky enough to be fire or hospital based, worker protections are almost nonexistent.
Different tick intervals based on perception would be funny. And practical.
Digging too deeply has been a plot point in many stories.

There’s even an urban legend that a failed Soviet borehole project broke into ‘hell’

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well_to_Hell
I would not sign up unless I know what languages are supported. This really should be mentioned on the front page.
Hmm the “token” scene with Einstein was the pivotal interpersonal misunderstanding / paranoia trigger for the antagonist.
You upgrade to a beefy machine with tons of CPU and enough memory to hold the database in RAM. This buys you enough time to migrate to something else.
The Artificial Intelligence Explicit Congestion Notification (AI ECN) function intelligently adjusts ECN thresholds of lossless queues based on the traffic model on the live network. This function ensures low delay and high throughput with zero packet loss, achieving optimal performance for lossless services.
I do woodworking and make furniture and cabinets on the side. Every time I design a piece, the first thing I ask is “what if some kid…”

The end result is that I take a bit more time figuring out some structural reinforcement I can use to ensure safety. It’s a good thing, but definitely tricky to implement at times while keeping designs unique and interesting.
I have a friend who works security at an art museum. He gets asked the same question about some benches. He likes to respond with "I won't answer whether it's art or not, but I'll say you are allowed to sit on it."
Not wasting 100 minutes of my life on that. I'd read a paper defending such a claim. In the meantime, here are a large number of abstracts of peer reviewed papers showing 100% RE is feasible:

https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/Comb...

Here's a review article on 100% RE studies:

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9837910

"The main conclusion of most of these studies is that 100% renewables is feasible worldwide at low cost."
I don’t have a good answer for the question of hellbanning Terry. Spamming every HN thread with irrelevant nonsense and long stretches of randomly generated text is naturally going to get anyone hellbanned. Would it have been merciful to try and make an exception for Terry personally? I don’t know.

The thing is, it never stopped him from posting, nor did it stop those of us with “showdead” enabled from seeing his comments. For me at least, Terry was a fixture of the old HN. Every story on the front page would have that one dead, greyed out comment at the bottom that didn’t make very much sense to anyone but him. I miss seeing those comments.
(1968)
I used both for a time. Ultimately, I felt protonmail provided the better experience with its cleaner interface and “bridge” client that let you use a program like thunderbird. It also had fewer ddos issues than tutanota, but it seems I was simply using tutanota at a rough time and those might not be as big a thing anymore.

All that said, I decided both platforms were somewhat without a point as no one else I knew used them. Which meant I may as well be using any other email platform out there. I settled on mailbox.org for my personal email. They are privacy respecting and work out of the box with any client I want. And I can still send encrypted email if I feel the need to do so.
Why robotics companies fails (2021)[pdf]
Paper mentions amorphous state plus an annealing step. Should be glass like at the end. If so, heat rates (up and down) of the last step are important and hardly mentioned.
> There are specific labor categories that cannot be filled just by paying more. They require more training and experience.

This is not exactly true. It's not at all true when talking about training, because paying people is what motivates them to take the risk of paying for their own training (and if you're training people yourself, you don't require trained people.) Experience is created by paying people enough not to leave the profession.

> Licensed tugboat captains are retiring/dying faster than new licenses are being granted.

Why weren't people trying to become tugboat captains for the past X years? Is it because the job paid too much?

-----

edit: I think you could say this is a collective action problem; nobody is willing to raise pay because it will make them uncompetitive against those who don't, but if they all raised pay they would all make more money and be more secure in the future. It's the kind of thing where an active government would step in and manage hiring and/or dictate pay. Instead, since our politicians are only concerned with what individuals are willing to pay them to do, they get lobbied to weaken labor regulations and immigration laws.

There are lots of unemployed black people desperate for work if one wants to fill up tugboats and construction sites. Just tell them where to show up.
Even with licensed products I buy from dispensaries, I just find that the experience is much more inconsistent.

I don’t know if that comes down to dosing, or if the body just reacts differently, but either way, it’s just rarely the experience I’m looking for.
I would trust the rust compile/rerun process a lot more than an auto-updating linux distribution, personally. Sooner or later that auto-updating package manager will break your config file, itself, or both.
My gut feeling based on my experience over the last couple of months is that substitution of an entire function is more reliable than some lines of a function. The surrounding context reduces the chance of hallucinations.

Gut feeling doesn't account for much though - I'm working on an evals system to be able to quantify system performance. It won't be cheap to run.

It could easily be that your method is superior.
In the general category of “most powerful radio transmitter”, it doesn’t even rank in the top 5. The biggest are 1MW+.

Many industrial sites use 450kW or more (see any bauxite processing plant) so are coupled with a power plant or have agreements for dedicated generation at nearby plants.
My First Slush Fund
This is really the barrier for me. I’ve written plenty of (company) internal packages that end up getting moderate adoption, but trying to open source is an exercise in personal marketing. It’s insufficient that your project solve a problem. You have to convince people to use it and make PRs to other repos that would use it, monitor SO for questions, etc.
Honestly it really was too much fuss about bees, in already very dense modpacks! I'm trying to get this space program off the ground so I can get back to my moonbase damnit. The reactor is melting down, I haven't got time for bees!
> They dash in between traffic and blatantly ignore any applicable traffic rule. Not even bikers in India and China dare to ride this fast in traffic.

There is nothing new about this. NYC bike messengers have been doing this for decades. The 2001 documentary Pedal:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyitrLKUUJI

* https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0380622/

And from (another?) documentary there were "The Klingons":

> Dubbed the “X-Men” — and wearing hockey helmets, full pads and a mix of motorcross gear and BMX gear — this crew of couriers rode like no one else in Manhattan. Pedaling was fine, but more often than not bikes were just a way to catch up to cars and trucks. “We’re also known as the Klingons, because that’s what we do: cling on to fast-moving vehicles,” says one member in a short documentary on the crew.

> As you can see, the crew wasn’t opposed to riding on the Henry Hudson Parkway, a freeway. As if going 50mph+ hanging on to a moving vehicle wasn’t crazy enough, this was in the pre-Giuliani years where New York was littered with deep potholes and mountain bike technology was still in a pre-suspension, pre-linear brake.

* https://gearjunkie.com/biking/1990s-new-york-city-bike-messe...
Quite right. Now that he’s had to take them down off the office, Elon will be around to set up his strobe lights outside your bedroom tomorrow.
The thing is, at that rate, you'll likely run out of ports without more advanced / exotic TCP configurations.

.. Ain't 65536 a capital B.

Edit: @toast0: valid point, thanks for the correction.
Another good example of this is airline captains. There's a big shortage right now, and simply paying more doesn't give a junior pilots 5,000 more hours in their logbook. They actually have to fly those hours first before they can become a captain. Also, pilots have a hard retirement cutoff for obvious reasons, so you can't even lure them back into work with dollars.

Airlines are paying more and more for captains, but it's not solving the shortage. They're just poaching them from each other, the total vacancies stays the same.
Chromium is currently trying to partition-visited links to prevent this type of history leakage - see:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/h7Ahp...
/cdn-cgi/trace isn't available on just cloudflare.com, it's on every site they proxy too (there might be a setting somewhere to disable it yet it's on by default). I've yet to figure out what happens if your site also serves something there, yet it was surprising to see on a barebones site I had routed through them.

I learned this from: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36383258
This does make sense then about the older (Cu substrate) video being higher resolution.
It’s more dangerous when cyclists go down one way streets the wrong way instead of going down the correct street.
Replying to myself to add a couple more traits I have which I suspect may be related:

- I'm a slow task-switcher. Really painfully slow. Halting a fully spun up 'deep task' feels cognitively costly and pretty annoying too. Even conversationally, if I'm deeply engaged in thought and someone starts speaking to me unexpectedly, I often miss the first one or two words they say and need to infer them from the subsequent context.

- Because of my "Listen, Think or Talk, Pick Any One (at a time)" limitation, people who've worked with me a while have joked that I operate with a "Ten-Second Tape Delay" because I'll often respond with a substantive thought or observation on the prior topic in the conversation. This is simply because once I listen to what's being said, task-switch to thinking about it, reach a conclusion, mentally compose what I'm going to say and then interject - it can be 10 or 15 seconds later. In my defense, the same people also tend to report that the wait is usually worth it. :-)

- I've also noticed I seem to have a high degree of attentional blindness in visual contexts as well. For example, I'm unusually slow at any kind of "Where's Waldo" visual search in a dense field. I'm notoriously bad at finding a person I'm looking for in a crowd or at locating an unfamiliar product on a large, visually busy shelf. I need to basically chunk the visual field down and parse it block by block. I also don't generally prefer visually crowded environments. My own spaces tend to be pretty sparse and well-grouped.

- On the strengths side, friends and co-workers report I'm often freakishly fast at transforming, combining and connecting abstract concepts and similar "brainstorming" type creativity tasks. Perhaps relatedly, I'm good at spatial manipulation. My wife says I have an abnormally good sense of direction which she calls "a god-like tab key" after the button to bring up the overhead map in many RPGs.

All that said, those who meet me or work with me wouldn't describe me as neuro-atypical because I certainly don't come across as being unusual or 'on the spectrum' or anything like that, at least at first. While the traits described above are certainly strong, only those who know me well and over a significant period of time would notice these things. Interestingly, I'd say almost all of them have noticed, in part because one key to my success has been understanding my strengths and weaknesses and making sure those around me do as well.
Does this mean that I could train an LLM to do something like spread fake news? Would that even scale?
Even as a teenager the anti-Sandinista politics of this game were clear: https://killscreen.com/previously/articles/the-forgotten-pol...

Contra was an early experience that made the propaganda of everyday life visible to me.
I recently conducted an interview for a position on my team and noticed that whenever I asked a question, the person being interviewed would give me a decent reply. But then whenever I asked a followup, the person started every followup answer with something like "I apologize if my responses are not meeting your expectations".

About halfway through it clicked that this person was just typing whatever I asked them into ChatGPT and then reciting me the answer :(
I've started using HN as my reddit replacement. As a mostly non-technical user, there's little for me to directly interact with, but at least the content is high quality.

I hope some of these options do catch on, but right now I'm not bothering with any of them. I went to reddit from digg, and that transition worked because 2010 era reddit was basically the old digg. Maybe I'm stuck in the mud, but lemmy et al seem too far adrift to replace reddit directly.
And Dropbox is little more than rsync, but that doesn't mean that it's not valuable for someone, even if it's not you.
Could be as simple as "test restore a new server every 1-2 years"
This brings up the topic of standard of evidence that's considered acceptable in various fields. Successful reconstruction of PIE languages is similar to mathematical derivations in theoretical physics. In physics, successful derivation of mathematical results would not be considered "evidence". Evidence is mostly limited to observed phenomenon. Linguistics as a field seems to accept reconstructions as evidence. Which is cool. But it is interesting to consider the implications of using the standard of evidence of physics as applied to Linguistics, because it would certainly weaken (not eliminate) the case for PIE. It may create space for inquiry into non-PIE-assumed theoretical work.
So, a money printing sim right?
boto3 is an SDK for the AWS API, CDK is an SDK for CloudFormation. boto3 is imperative, CDK is declarative. You can do CDK-like things _in_ boto3, but past a certain level of complexity you'll end up reimplementing so much functionality that you would have done better to just learn enough to use the CDK.

Comparing issues is particularly irrelevant in this case since (as you say) the boto3 API is pretty much stable (since it is "just" a language-specific client to an established API), whereas there are regularly requests for higher-level Constructs in CDK.
I think the author's characterization of "Open Source Rambos" caring more about the licensing than the software is unfair: we learned through bitter experience that if you care about the software, you need to care about the license first.

Today, licensing is something that many (probably most) developers are able to ignore without repercussions. That wasn't always true, perhaps won't be true in future, and isn't true even now for those whose businesses need to sell their software or are simply a little more scrupulous about how their software is made.

As someone who lived through the earlier era, it's hard not to see this as a potentially fatal weakness: an ability to bring down large chunks of the ecosystem with a single determined actor invoking legal mayhem.
Important additional rumours I heard from a little birdie:

The Nature rejection was because of the Ranga Dias affair, and it wasn't an outright rejection but a requirement that the paper be submitted to a local journal and peer reviewed by local scientists before it would be considered.

Before Kwon joined the team at LG's alleged insistence, the reason that Lee and Kim had restarted research at all was because Choi Dong-Shik had summoned them to his deathbed, and his dying wish was that they prove his theory right; Lee and Kim judged that LK-99 was the best candidate for doing so. If true, that is objectively insane. Imagine if we actually get RTAPS because of an old professor's dying wish, like something out of a fairytale.
Haha that’s a good point. I do love Stripe for that exact reason. However, it would be nice to have some more transparency on what is baked and what isn’t.

The innovative side of Stripe will probably pull me back in. Plaid has it’s drawbacks as well. It’s not a hard sell to use an alternative

The financial aggregation market is a little stale. I hope Stripe can mix it up
How much would it take before you go work pouring concrete? As in, the minimum you'd take to start.
Because that is what a municipality is!

It's kind of the whole point that you are agreeing to share the space you are in. If you don't want to share, go occupy an incorporated chunk of land.
I'm not sure you want advice, but I use edible medicinally. I live in Washington and discussed it with my doctors. I also can pretty much only find 10mg doses. What I've found is that after a year I built a tolerance but because I'm regimented with my doctor, 10mg 1x every night, my tolerance has balanced out. It still affects me enough to put me to sleep but it doesn't drop below that. Before I talked to my doctor I was increasing my dosages and it felt like an endless uphill battle to get to the point I could sleep comfortably.

I'm not sure if you're looking for recreational or medicinal, but if it's medicinal the key is to have a regiment. If not, just cut the edible in half. If you're buying gummies they're well enough mixed that you can track the dosage by portioning them carefully.
Sine the wiki hasn't been opened for editing yet, there is indeed only one function that has visible implementations (which was added for testing purposed): https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z10000 - all others are built-in and then invisible.

The two implementations are in Python and JavaScript (and rather trivial):
https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z10004
https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z10005
There's a whole list of such resolvers:

Akamai:

dig +short whoami.akamai.net @ns1-1.akamaitech.net

Google:

dig +short o-o.myaddr.l.google.com txt @ns1.google.com

Cloudflare:

dig +short whoami.cloudflare ch txt @1.1.1.1

OpenDNS:

dig -4 +short myip.opendns.com @resolver1.opendns.com

Note that if you leave off the `@service.authoritative.nameserver` portion of all of the above, you get the IP address of the recursive resolver that your machine is configured to use. If you pass this to a service like https://ipinfo.io/, you can use this to figure out what company's DNS service is currently configured, be it your ISPs, or an internet company like Cloudflare/Google/Quad9.

Arguably, that is the only valid reason to be using an IP address echoer via DNS, as if you truly wanted your own IP, you could fetch it far easier from a service like icanhazip.com.

Personally, Akamai's offering is by far the most useful and convenient--it's an A record, so you won't accidentally forget to add "txt" to your dig invocation, and has a very easy to remember name. Google's works too, though it requires remembering the strange domain name. Cloudflare tries to be cute and uses the Chaosnet DNS class, which while being an incredibly cool reference to internet history, unfortunately is not propagated by most public recursive resolvers. And like the parent comment mentions, OpenDNS somehow blocks requests that pass through a recursive resolver.
I have to admit, I once agreed with this position, before I got to a ~5g a day habit. While I was a heavy user (6+ years) I was a strong proponent of legalization etc. "Better than booze", "It's only a gateway because it builds connections with people that have other stuff available".

But there is arguably a physical dependence at that routing usage. First thing every morning, every 1-2 hours another J. I wanted to quit almost every day. I'd have conversations with my partner about quitting every few days. But neither of us could. If we had none we wouldn't sleep for 48+ hours, just didn't happen. Anxiety sets in, stress about everything. You just want to sleep, so you smoke. You go broke you scour the house to find enough coins or bottle to return (EU here) to get .2g to roll once to just get to the next day. You leave the house to do anything and you're so anxious and paranoid you become misanthropic. Only way to deal with it is to go home and "relax" to manage the borderline panic. Just for reference, before I was maybe a bit awkward sometimes but had absolutely no issues with the outside world.

I also don't agree that afterwards you're in the clear. I used to be borderline photographic with my memory. I'd pull random statistics from papers I'd read years earlier in conversation with references that I could use to validate when challenged. I no longer can even remember what I decided to go to the grocery store for, even though it's a ~2 minute walk. I forget what I started a sentence to express while typing. I'm a systems engineer, when I change tabs in an IDE I lose nearly all the context I took with me to the new tab. Sure context switching breaks flow yadda yadda, but it's just different. I don't even remember there was something to remember, just... "why am I here again?"?

I do agree that the behaviour trigger is very strong, so I replaced the urge with League, an arguably far more self-destructive tendency.
We need better roads for ebikes
yep. I'm currently pretty fatigued with the offerings at bottle shops and taprooms....increasingly glad I committed to brewing my own a long while back. Currently sipping on a very delightful British Golden Ale - a style I haven't seen commercially available around me, but will now be a standard in my summer brewing.