skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You’re always allowed to complain. You can go to court to get the civil forfeiture returned.

In cases of petty theft or drug dealing, it’s not really worth either side (police or suspected criminal) to go through formal proceedings for $100. So either you put the onus on the police, in which case they’ll just stop enforcing a lot of small crimes because it’s not worth the hassle, or you put the onus on the suspected criminal, in which case you have some innocent people lose $100 unless they go to court.
The original use case of CAF as a way to seize assets of unknown or absentee owners with clear connections to crimes makes it make more sense both legally and philosophically. IMO the big fix for civil asset forfeiture is that if there is a claimant you need to charge them with some crime to seize it and it has to go through the normal process.
TinyTV Teardown
You don't see the middle ground between "make no one uncomfortable" and "make everyone uncomfortable?" It seems to me you're viewing this completely in black and white and then insisting that it really is black and white in actual reality, when in fact what you need is a better TV.

(To strain the turn of phrase to its breaking point.)

e: I mean, shit, even in the false dichotomy of "make no one uncomfortable" and "make everyone uncomfortable" there is middle ground: making everyone a little bit uncomfortable vs making everyone extremely uncomfortable.
SSN is voluntary. USA passport application has a spot for SSN and it may be left blank or may accidentally contain rando numbers (I have done both). TSA full body scan is also voluntary, along with voluntary showing ID at their (Soviet era) checkpoints.
Don't.

You either meet your cofounder in college or you are better off alone.

Maybe if your startup is health/drug/music centered you could be lucky and meet him at the gym or at the club.

In any event Nature isn't stupid, the more you try and force it the worse the outcome is gonna be, this dude has to be your friend first and foremost, this requires at least 1-2 years of daily interaction and frequentation before you even introduce the idea of building a business together, and also he needs to have your same passion and not be in it for the money otherwise you'd be two surfers trying to paddle to catch up with a wave which is much faster than you.

Your best bet is to focus on the aforementioned sectors where you sweat/snort/dance together for 1-2 years on a regular basis and then build a business in such fields . The business doesn't have to necessarily be a startup, it can be a gym or a nightclub too and then if you still want to the startup can be the next iteration of that.

Finally do all the above away from SF, you'd be the new kid on the block nobody wants to talk to, and to add insult to injury you'd get stabbed as you walk through human feces and rivers of pee.
First, by this argument, literally every urban center is a military target. Put another way, it's an argument for total war, in which nothing is off limits, and every "enemy" civilian is fair game. Is that the world you want to live in?

Second, the US did not target any specific industrial areas of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In each case, it targeted the center of town, with the goal of inflicting maximum destruction on the city as a whole.
> as far as we know

Therein lies the rub. "As far as we know." Human knowledge only goes back, what, 2000 years? Industrialization started, what, only 150 years ago? The printing press is, eh, 500 years old? Ubiquitous computers began... literally an instant ago in cosmic timescales.

So while my argument might be summarized as "this one thing may be real because this other thing may be real but just 20 years ago wasn't even hypothetically conceived", your argument is basically "there's no way this one thing is real because this other thing is only distantly hypothetically real and still has flaws and besides, the whole concept is preposterous because there should either be aliens literally everywhere already or nowhere, because that makes about as much sense (maybe they're leaving our "incubator" mostly alone?), and because we simply don't understand how it's possible, despite the fact that we are basically 5 day old babies (and apparently VERY cocky ones) as far as science and human knowledge is concerned at cosmic timescales." LOL
Lawyers are going to have a field day over the next few years litigating over these discriminatory practices in view of SFFA and it’s logical corollaries: https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/AGLetterFortune...

What’s remarkable is that apparently none of these hiring managers and executives saw this coming. The stuff they’ve put into writing is wild. Some of the stuff, like aspirational racial quotas, wasn’t even legal under pre-SFFA law. I don’t know who was advising these people.
Toolz, I think you're arguing for slavery.
> but the reason nobody else does is because no one else wants to. They want to be free to change old stories.

You're wildly assuming a motive with zero evidence.

No, the reason companies aren't building blockchain verification of their stories is simply because it's expensive and complicated to do, for literally zero commercial benefit.

Archive.org already will prove any difference to you, and it's much easier to use/verify than any blockchain technology.
Their github repo README has the following:
> Performant ...

Do we have benchmarks for this? More generally speaking, I don't see more technical differentiation besides it being a Python DSL. Nor do they provide numbers to back it up.
The letter reflects the spirit valued by the community, OSI, and FSF. You are free to choose a different term to reflect a different spirit.
Oh, please. You're grossly misinformed. If anything, US is lagging lightyears behind Europe in terms of fighting fraud and fighting card schemes, which are stripping everyone equally in US, banks and customers alike.

PSD2 directive intruduced a lot of novelties, which no one at the time had (and very few do, not even US). For instance, specific to this situation - remote payments above 30 eur must be SCA (strong customer authentication, similar to 2FA, but more elaborate) verified (small value exception from PSD2 RTS). Also, banks must have both real time and post-time transaction monitoring in place, i.e. they must have systems to detect and prevent such fraudulent attemtps. There literally tens if not hundreds of fraud fighting measures in PSD2, which all banks (both acquirer and issuer) must come mply with. I could go on and on (not the place and format).

Frankly, it's utterly unbelievable that this kind of thing could happen without anyone (either acquirer or issuer) intervenining. Not what could (should) happen here in Europe.
I think Zapier's NLA solution goes in a similar direction and as far as I know, they are running their model on the server side to adjust workflow input and output of workflows to the unique needs of an LLM model. They are doing an amazing job there and I am also currently working on improving this (e.g. adjusting to a model's token limit).

Besides that, Lemon Agent focuses on providing an out-of-the-box agent that is great at solving tasks with workflow automation. If you want to use Zapier NLA you have to rely on generalistic agents like LangChain's ReAct Agent or the Plan and Execution Agent or you have to build your own agent. In any case, you have to twist the agent a lot to reach a certain degree of accuracy and reliability.
Precisely. I grew up in an odd town on Lake Erie. On the coast there were the Cleveland Clinic millionaire surgeons, NFL, MLB, and NBA players. On the west side of town a Ford plant and some low income housing, same income and housing on the east side. Middle bit was mostly solid middle class with a couple small higher income enclaves (CEO of a Berkshire Hathaway division, for instance).

So it was truly, truly all income levels interacting in our public schools (which are pretty highly rated).

I graduated in 2009. Close to 10% of my graduating class (~400), all income levels, died of opioid overdoses or suicide. The shame of talking about our town's problem and wanting keep up appearances killed scores of people.

BBC did a documentary on our town, called Smack in Suburbia, focussed on my age group. 30 minute watch, but, it really drives this point home https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7ynJ5S9c58

All of this tragedy was the direct consequence of shame as public health policy.
And racoons steal your garbage. I'm not sure what either of those has to do with the article though.
In the context of our current work culture, yes I think I agree with that. But I think that's a symptom of how dysfunctional our current work culture is.

edit:

> Can you tell us more?

I literally can't actually, at least not as a reply to you, because dang has once again limited my ability to post on HN. Too many left-leaning folks here already, I guess. Here is what my reply would have been:

> If you're happy with the wholly adversarial relationship between employee and employer along with management practices that pit people against each other etc then more power to you. If you think this results in the best outcomes both in terms of working conditions and also productivity, then go off king. I don't think anything I could say here would convince you otherwise, anyway.

...and now I'll be exiting this conversation as I've been given no other choice - see ya!
I think you need a bigger word than digging, it wouldn't be a gang of navvies with shovels. The cost would be enormous, there are better ways to spend the money: solar, wind, better electricity networks, DC interconnects.
It is also possible for economic reasons like reorganizations, but still, those will need a valid reason, and severence packages are mandatory. Just sacking people who don't have a temporary contract is impossible.
You could explain why it matters, instead of complaining that people don't understand. Delta-8 is also psychoactive and not well known so it's easy to mix up.

CBD has been legal for a while and is completely different than THC products so it shouldn't be compared.

Stating Delta-9 is legal, not Delta-8, is not that big of a difference. If you think it is, you should talk about why it matters because your attitude obviously hasn't worked thus far for dealing with people who just don't understand. Maybe, you're not concerned with people understanding as much as you state.
I wish I could make a hackernews post that went viral everytime I got screwed over by a company
You set up mail forwarding today and eventually, in the span of just a few years you'll be free of Google.
> Since when has going to the office been a matter of forcing people?

Since always? Until Covid, there was no choice. People did it because they had to. Covid just reminded people that there is another way to live and how much quality of life they're actually sacrificing for their job.
Not to mention any reasonable competitor is using our FOSS-licensed code to compete against us (such as our symbolification services). There is nuance and people don’t care about that. We will keep shipping.
This is interestingly close to the off-repeated line that on a forum 10% of users comment and 1% create content.
I'm pretty sure H1 Team is short for HackerOne Team, not Hi Team
Wall Street Is Fighting New York’s Ban on Non-Compete Agreements
He should be angry at Republicans for all their posturing and holding the economy hostage just to try to push their wildly unpopular political agendas, not at the organization calling them out for how wildly mismanaged their financial rules seem to be.
1. I haven't spent a lot of time around cults.

2. I didn't claim this defines a cult, I'm pointing out a key difference.
> You should also include cash-price options

This is an amazing hack.

Also, it's harder for them to include it, because those aren't available like insurance rates are.
It loaded fine for me just now (50 minutes after your comment was posted). Perhaps it's only paywalled while it's new news?
HN loves decentralized solutions. Talk about blogs, RSS, the old web, mashups and you get a lot of positive feedback. Also mastodon and matrix got a lot of coverage here, everything in the category of peertube. And encrypted alternatives to potential monopolies as well, Signal vs Whatsapp for example.

But you are simply mistaken if you believe a bunch of obvious scams with not a single usecase bundled to one illegitimate buzzword is a decentralized solution, and of course the crowd here will see right through such bullshit. That web 3.0 scambubble never had a chance here.
The Push and Pull of Building Products
That's true, but a non sequitur. They didn't ask whether it was true, they asked what it was a quote from.
People have lost funds on blockchain technology due to scam / bugs / errors. With no one to complain too, regulations is always the way imho, more anarchy can’t be the answer to anarchy
Beyond the hype, AI promises leg up for scientific research
Humans cannot reliably detect speech deepfakes
Welcome to 21st century. Sincerely, the rest of the developed world.

I hope TurboTax and friends doesn't manage to screw this one up.
I've been extremely critical of "AI Safety" since "how do I hotwire a car?" became the defacto 'things we can't let our LLM say'.

There are plenty of good reasons why hot wiring a car might be necessary, or might save your life. Imagine dying because your helpful AI companion won't tell how to save yourself because that might be dangerous or illegal.

At the end of the day, a person has to do what the AI says, and they have to query the AI.
It's better than a Lenovo (I've used many) because the trackpad itself is better, the software doesn't have an impact. It's just the usual synaptics driver so you could configure it the way you like.
High-mounted wings require the structure holding the wing to be suspended higher in the fuselage, requiring it to be stronger. Their main advantage is to avoid obstacles in the ground, which is desirable when landing in less developed airfields, but it's not a problem airliners have.
Eliminating smartphones from your life may not be practical without supportive peers who are willing to do the same. Otherwise, you may end up being the person who becomes an extra burden to contact, while others efficiently use apps for communication. It would require being significantly important for this to work, and let's be realistic, not all of us hold that level of significance.
A legal right can exist without ethics.
Hybrid is not reasonable. Hybrid means having to maintain a home office and also remain within commuting distance. It is the worst of both worlds. Even the people who choose to work every day in office are complaining: they can’t find a desk now. It’s been a hilarious shitshow that I get to watch remotely.
No, I'm saying that hackeronies does not make everyone uncomfortable / is not necessarily cult indoctrination. Stuff like that can and does arise naturally in groups of people (and can also arise as a control mechanism).

You're saying there are pure non-creepy fun actions for everyone that a business can do. I'm saying it's too gray to make that assertion, not too black and white. So I'm curious what you think is perfectly safe for everyone.
ER doctor on how LLMs may shape the future of medicine for better and worse
Speedrunners are beating the whole game from scratch within 1h 30m or so.

https://www.speedrun.com/upc
Only rich people subscribe to genre magazines. Like, I really like Clarkesworld, but between it, Analog, Asimov's, and a few others... I just can't.

And last I checked, libgen hasn't had any Clarkesworld since about 2019.
> Purity does not affect Tc.

Here's a lump of 100% Cu and another lump of 50% Cu and 50% "other".

If purity doesn't matter, they must have the same properties? Why not just use 0.0001% copper in all our applications and save millions on material costs.
> doesn’t entitle them to my attention

if you're looking at someone's website then yes they are entitled to your attention. what gave you the idea that you're entitled to consume for free content that other people payed to produce and host?
The finetuning can tailor the model to have more customized knowledge, just like the identity knowledge of itself shown in the blog post. If you ask the original llama model, it should know nothing about SkyPilot or Vicuña, as it is trained on old knowledge from the internet.

However, finetuning still cannot get rid of the hallucination problem that all the chatbot suffers from.
It depends on how accurate you expect the chatbot should be. The retrieval might be considered more accurate, as it will not make up solutions, but just return irrelevant answer in the worst case.
I get calls nowadays with caller id telemarketer or suspected spam or similar, is this what it does?
Interesting bit about sane logic. Is it something you verify manually by reading the pull request code? Or do you rather expect automated tests that use something like spies to check when a control structure is called?

In my coding life, I had a period where I was super into test driven development with mocks and I believe I was doing something very similar to what you called sane logic check. However, I later dropped this approach in favor of heavily parametrized tests where checks happen only on the output of functions and on side effects when necessary (e.g. an email is sent or a row is updated in the database).

Note:
I am using this Martin Fowler's definition for "spies": https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TestDouble.html
How do you feel about someone calling themselves a xoogler?
As opposed to the comment, "Yikes. Imagine living in a situation where the government of your own country has as much care for your life as the enemy."

...which you're defending as if it isn't smug, self-righteous, tiresome, and obvious?
Absolutely. We could definitely chalk this up to being the "exception that proves the rule".
Please, name an example. Particularly, EU being behind LATAM. As an expert, I'm honestly interested.
Work at a place that made expensive physical objects. Customers calling in because they could use the objects because they plugged the hardware key into a different machine was all the time ...

Like the hardware had to be wired to the computer running the software. An extra hardware key that needs to be plugged into the computer as well doesn't do anything!
I think one factor that's overlooked with these simulations is that there are a ton of parameters to these which really hinder automated searching.

It's easy (relatively) to verify the results from a real world test since you know the physical parameters and can tweak the others based on intuition, where if the result matches the real world you can consider it valid, but if it doesn't you can have to check all sorts of things to be sure that it isn't a glitch due to some parameter not being reasonable.

That makes searching for materials really hard because you either need an absurd amount of computational power to be able to set the simulation parameters so high as to not worry about their effects or you get tons of false positives simply because the computer can't as easily tune those parameters to ensure it produces correct results.

As my PhD advisor has often put it regarding my own simulation work, if the simulations were that capable of modeling reality, there would be no need for billion dollar facilities to perform tests irl, you'd just spend all that on building many supercomputers.
That's a pretty neat idea.

Obviously might be a challenge to find enough volunteers and this is unfortunately really only a bandaid on the actual problem.

Curious to know why you included a login with Google account though. Feels like they're particularly well known for disabling accounts.
Are politicians creators?
This reads in some ways like American urbanists discussing Chinese infrastructure and the building boom.
> Notice that with the Apple case, a problem in something completely unrelated to email can cause this

Uhm, conjecture? The Reddit poster complained about app/media store lock, if they lost something more important like iCloud with photos and email that'd be a totally different story instead of "I lost some movies".
> Why wouldn't such people be allowed to profit off their biometric data?

And legalize selling kidneys. My body my choice.
So I can build a business on it, then?
Thanks - glad it's useful for your Japanese. Do you like it being in the Japanese writing system or would you prefer phoenetical English? Wasn't sure which to do on that one.

Thanks for the feedback. The processing point has come up a couple of times so I'll definitely be adding that, and I'll look into doing some contextual scenarios. If your language is good enough, you could try prompting it to act as, eg a waiter in a restauraunt, but that's far from ideal for beginners!

Sure - realtime transcription makes a lot of sense. I'll look into it.
It’s much, much easier to change account details when you can still access the old email. Get your own domain for $20/year and you never have to worry about losing access again. You can always redirect your domain to a new email provider if something happens
Yes - a Casio fx991ES PLUS.

Have owned it since school, and I vastly prefer it for quick maths to a phone or a computer-based calculator.

I keep looking for something similarly basic and affordable that has a backlit display, so far no hits!
IMO the equivalent to Midi files in the 3D world is OBJ files.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavefront_.obj_file

It's just a simple text file but it supports 3D objects and materials and is supported by pretty much everything. A complete novice can write code to generate it.
Nope, here are the rules: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/

No time limit nonsense, get a warrant. Charge them with a crime. That's the law no matter what the idiots running courthouses in this country think, your precedent has no power here.
Huge news. This means it is not a scam as a discovery of this type of superconductor would be big enough.

It also means it is unlikely they were measuring wrong for multiple years.

My layman take is that Korean sample is just a better or different batch that is properly superconducting at room temperature.
Hackeroni and cheese?
> It's a couple of hundred euros per year when you're on a stipend.

I was talking about what it costs to the state. You do realise it’s heavily subsidised, don’t you?
This conflates "Civil Asset Forfeiture" with "Asset Forfeiture", and any analysis which doesn't preserve that distinction is meaningless.

Bernie Madoff had his assets seized. That's not wrong, illegal, or unconstitutional.
>I am the customer and I would love to see the data of which providers _originated_ each call that I'm about to answer.

The telcos have this information, but they only usually relay the CallerID (which is user-specified, ie "spoofable") to the end user. ANI, RPID, and now SHAKEN/STIR information which does identify the origin and origin carrier are simply not passed to end users to do anything with, or at least I have not been able to get them to do it despite having capable interfaces.
Well kinda. The business wanting to market themselves certainly isn't your problem, but the "how does the website monetize itself" is exactly your problem, or rather, it's part of the interaction between the owner of the website you're visiting and you.

You could say "oh, they should just charge for their content", and some definitely do. But the ad model allows for really interesting price discrimination in terms of "who pays for the content". So, if someone buys say.. a Tesla through a website, that conversion subsidizes a million poor kids who don't have to pay anything. In some ways the ad-supported model is the most progressive way to pay content creators - the people who end up paying are the people who spend the most money online.