skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, it's officially mainstream. No chance of this remaining an academic story if it fails to replicate now.

Just a reminder: it could take months to a year to figure out whether this is legit. Contrary to initial impressions from the (terrible, full of holes) included methodology, the synthesis process is actually difficult (not gigapascal diamond anvil difficult, but not just baking store bought powder in a furnace then squeezing either). A successful replication could happen at any moment, but one not happening until six months or more from now is very possible too, and isn't a death knell for the material (or the material family).

We normally aren't exposed to scientific research this early in the process. There are a lot of alleged dramatic reasons for why we are in this case being exposed to the research before the original team wanted us to be, as well as COVID normalising people taking arXiv preprints far more seriously (for completely understandable reasons). Also, while I don't agree with this scientific philosophy at all on principle, this is coming out of a commercial lab and I have no idea whether and to what extent they are willing to share samples/invite outside teams into their labs, considering they are likely attempting to monetise this as much as possible (I hate this mindset, hope it fails!).

The wildcard here is citizen scientists (including a particular Soviet molecular biologist) and the various labs around the world that are trying to replicate. With how bad the methodology documentation is many labs will probably fail to replicate if just looking at that (but Li Liu et al of Beihang U, that XRD pattern really should have made you look a lot closer at whether you'd successfully synthesised), I don't know what the odds are on outside labs being able to replicate without much better information on methodology and materials. It could end up not being feasible until the original research team offers more help, and while they're offering some help now they've also implied they want to get their paper published first before really opening up (this part is normal).

Just going to be a waiting game. If you want to follow the drama and find the citizen science/"It's so over... We're so back!!!" saga entertaining, then definitely follow the accounts on Twitter that are doing that. If you just want to know whether we have peer-reviewed, reputably published, replicated results confirming RTAPS, then you just have to wait it out until academia resolves this over the next year.
My point is: IQ tests fail to provide a measure of intelligence. The linked video at the end discusses some reasons why, such as environmental, educational, and cultural differences. The primary problem with these tests is that they are created by groups of people who have their own specific view on what intelligence is.

Yes, these tests assess certain traits of an individual, but intelligence is likely a more complex topic. Consider the language part of some tests, for example. These tests include vocabulary that the test subjects must know in order not to be discriminated against due to cultural and environmental factors. Instead, vocabulary capacity is measured. Language tests should include logical tasks of varying complexity, which must be solved without providing a variety of answers. If answers are provided, this will test for pattern recognition traits.
> That's worth a few hundred million a year, isn't it?

More like $20 billion, perhaps up to 25% of all services revenue. https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/02/21/20-billion-reasons...
The few times you tow, you typically need full range, or what do you try to say?
If you're purchasing the "not pro" version for a much cheaper cost, and it is a functional program (basic things like Save not locked behind the paywall), having different tiers of paid features is fine. You were able to pick to have the lower tier features, even if you end up downloading the same exact files.

When it comes to hardware, if they've already installed the feature, they've already factored the cost of it into the purchase price. Your out the door cost includes that heated seat hardware, even if it's not a line item. And you don't have the option to have it removed for a discount (or get a lower car package). You only have the option to pay to use the thing that's already in your car or not to pay to use it.
Would be a nice story if it weren’t for the inconvenient fact that Teslas are selling like crazy as they are.

Sounds like it would be problem for the consumer, though clearly a solved one.
Even before I had door cameras, I would just not answer the door if I wasn't expecting someone. Everyone I know would know enough to call or text before coming over, and anyone in an emergency would keep knocking.

I've had plenty of obnoxious salespeople and other solicitors, especially religious ones. They even have the nerve to claim that they aren't soliciting because they're not selling anything for money. And none of them have the good sense to accept that they're bothering someone that is obviously not happy that their door was knocked on.

Unless I'm already in a really bad mood, I generally start off nice, but I turn serious as soon as they refuse to take the first 'no'. Except for the ones I argue with for a while to waste their time and energy.
Brave sees Mozilla's political shitfest and raises a political shitbacchanalia.
That's not my takeaway at all. Can you please elaborate?
Curious, why do that, and not say attack the power grid?
Where did I say you could access these without authentication? Nowhere.

But I can still access them with my device being controlled by me, I can create bots/extensions to export and archive content. I can because there's no reliable method to identify whether my device acts in my interest, so they have no choice - they have to restort to methods that can be cracked. WEI is an attempt to introduce that reliable method.

Sure, there's EME with Widevine L1, but this is currently limited to providing media content, not apps themselves. That's why WEI is considered the DRM for the web.
Incredible work, this is the most exciting AI dev tool I've come across!

Do you have a strategy to supplement ChatGPT to handle post-2021 updates to languages and libraries? I tried it on a NextJS repo and it came up with something that looked like it would have been correct a few versions ago, but I had to make some manual changes. Certain fast-moving ecosystems might frequently have this issue.
Personally I just toggle to only show the percentage and ignore the battery range estimate. When on longer trips, the nav estimate is usually spot on, or at worst a couple of % off due to my not-predictable driving behavior.
I tried to get newspapers to report on it and they kept telling me they already covered ocean acidification.
Mozillateam Ppa Switches to Snaps
Up until today, in order to continue using firefox on ubuntu as an app and not a snap, you could install this ppa and configure apt to prefer it.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1399383/how-to-install-firef...

That just broke.

What now, LibreWolf I guess? Finally get off my a-- and switch to plain debian?
NAT and Stateful firewalling are commonly bundled together (especially on home systems) but I would not go so far as to say “NAT has a stateful firewall”-

I hear such takes all the time and its really frustrating; usually in threads regarding IPv6, incidentally it is usually programmers who think they understand everything about networks because they know how tcp operates.
This isn't new. Automakers following software companies' subscription model

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/automakers-bmw-gm-mercedes-char...
how do people successfully get together when they're old?

Do they just become bf/gf? until they get bored or some crisis exceeds a threshold?

are people who are single later in life broken? or just in a bad situation? do they have decent maturity, with the ability to have a much more decent relationship than young people do?

Do they marry? is that success?
If they sell you a car with heated seats, you should have heated seats. They already sold you the heated seats, you already have the heated seats, and they just want more money for something they already got money for, and you already have.
Because one of the meaningful, intimate, things someone can give you was given up 23 times in a row. You're not special and that has an effect on one's psyche. You can certainly enjoy a person's company but you will never be able to connect to them on anything more than a surface level. If a person puts themselves in a very vulnerable position with numerous people it speaks volumes about their ability to maintain relationships and assess risk. Even without getting into the spirtuality of it the person is likely damaged goods. This goes equally for both genders - by the way.

Divorce rates correlate strongly with previous partner count. It's easy to find a meaningful relationship. It's hard to find a relationship where you're not going to be compared to 23 other men (or women). At 30+ you're also dealing with potential kids from the other person which in the case of fathers is a minefield should you stick around long enough to become "defacto" dad in the eye of the court.
I’m not sure how I led you there. I simply meant it’s
only a matter of time until physical background characters become obsolete.
> I know this is a judgemental view

It’s not. Life is not rose colored. Some people get lucky and find their life partners, while others die alone.
People overreact to this. If this didn't exist, they would just manufacture cars the old way where multiple version of the same car are produced at high and low prices. I have seen no evidence provided this actually increases the total price of a high feature car. This might actually lower the average price paid because of the economies of scale achieved by making fewer different versions of the same car. Resale value can increase as well, since the person buying your car can get the features they want, even if you didn't originally purchase those features.
Weird that Blizz didn't do that for Diablo4. They did it for WoW which was pretty much the first time I ever encountered character sheets for games on the Internet.
Yes! You'll be dead before the worst of it!

While backers of the RNC are the worst offenders in the US, please don't let the DNC off the hook:

https://www.levernews.com/obamas-greenwash/
And that’s 65. I’ve been in places where the speed limit is 70 but people usually go 75-80.

That’s 20-25mph faster than you. At that point you’re practically impeding traffic, and having a big truck pass you is terrifying.

Just because you can legally drive 55 or maybe even less doesn’t make it safe.
Aside from Ocean Acidification, uncontrollable Algae Blooms, and Melting Sea Ice, we now have Ocean Deoxygenation on our plates. We also have unprecedented droughts on land as well. Humans really will be the next mass extinction event on this planet. So incredibly selfish.
> It's pretty shocking to me that people in our society build things and then deliberately break them so they can make more money. Is this really the best system we can come up with?

All part of cost tradeoffs. Previously, they'd build the car with the ability to support all those add-ons even if the customer isn't getting them. Turns out it's cheaper not to do that.
Sure, but not in the same league compared to sellers calling over the phone in my experience.

I guess it comes down to the effective wanna answer the door to not wanna answer the door ratio. I don't want to miss someone I'd like to meet to avoid the 1/X chance of a seller. As sibling comment noted that ratio probably depends on local circumstances.
The tiny battery gauge is just showing what % the charge is, either in % or in % * epa range. There is no lie, just showing you the state of your battery pack currently. If you want to see what charge you will have in the future taking into account your driving then you navigate to your destination and the car makes a very detailed estimate of state of charge in % at your destination.

I leave my car showing battery as % all the time, because the % * epa range number is meaningless
Kagi uses Google search results.

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/why-kagi/kagi-vs-google.html
> - keeps their clients tied to their services

I have heard this claim so many times but it is easy to prove it wrong given how much we focus on documentation and understandability around Elixir and main libs. I have had clients asking me questions and I would answer it by improving the docs or writing a guide, committing it to the repo, and then asking the client for feedback. Half of the Ecto guides were written like this.

It is not about keeping clients at all. It is about having a great on-boarding (and beyond) experience.
"The great firewall of china blocks me and I lose 10 social credit points"
You have to be able to put the device in developer mode to load non-google signed OS images. I'm not sure it's mandated that this be possible for every device so I would absolutely do some research to make sure the device I'm about to buy allows developer mode. On old/early chromebooks you had to physically open them (voiding the warranty) and remove a special screw to enable developer mode for example.

Also even when you have developer mode enabled the stock chromebook firmware is a little annoying and won't boot until you press ctrl-d on the keyboard to confirm you agree to booting an unsigned image. There is no way to disable this behavior and it happens every single boot whether you want it or not. The Mr. Chromebox firmware this article mentions has to be flashed to a device to remove this annoyance and make the device boot like regular laptops.
Make it a thread on X
It's listed under the "Implementations" section of that wiki article.
⇡ This is the founder of Drop Table
>So people should not have the option of paying less of paying less for less features?

They should, it's called buying a different car without those features installed.

>Everyone must pay for features that only a subset of customers use?

You are already paying for those features upfront as part of buying the car - there is no recurring expense to the manufacturer. If you do not want or are unable to pay for those features, you buy a different car without them installed.

What you're arguing for is for everyone to have to pay another monthly subscription, and conflating "paying more for a car" with "paying monthly for non-consumable resources for a car".
I do agree with the sentiment, but in this particular example if I were the local government I’d endure the pain for the 24-36 hours it’d take to get the inflicted vehicles gathered up and then simply ban them from driving until the manufacturer fixes the issue.

If I didn’t have the legal authority to do it I’d probably still do it and rather pay the damages than the ransom.
Memory-related processing primary driver of human hippocampal theta oscillations
Okay, if you assume non-renewable generation that cannot be curtailed, then you are right of course.

And your second point is also valid, a small flat rate infeed may be easier to bill for the broker than per-minute pricing with curtailment. But this will only be the case if prices aren't negative for too long.
Royal Mail to Issue “Terry Pratchett’s Discworld” Stamps
> it’s only the “activate” script that hard-codes a full path.

So…they aren’t then.
I think what the person above you is talking about is not EPA range vs "real world" range. It is "car's estimate of remaining range before you have to recharge" and " real world remaining range before you have to recharge".

E.g., suppose the EPA range is 300 miles, you started from with a full charge, are 100 miles into your trip, and are at 1/2 charge. If what others have said is correct by default Tesla will estimate you have another 150 miles of range left (EPA range of 300 x 1/2 charge), whereas many others would say you have 100 miles of range left (you went 100 miles so far on 50% charge so if nothing changes the remaining 50% should give another 100).
Who speak different languages. It also costs much more per minute to call EU cellphones.
"They're just jealous" is rarely actually true. It's usually said by people who don't want to hear the actual reasons for whatever resentment exists.
Java: New Draft JEP: “Computed Constants”
This isn't like Apple at all. They started the touchscreen smartphone trend, the notch trend, and now they're investing in something almost all the big companies have done.
They became a multi-billion dollar business by:

A) Promising scale (and delivering to a certain extent)

B) being significantly more convenient than contemporary solutions

C) becoming trendy

D) hoodwinking CxO’s into the belief that not owning your data is better for you, actually. (CapEx vs OpEx)

E) unfathomable amounts of DevRel.

Nobody has ever claimed AWS was cost effective, they have said that “it’s worth the cost” though.
I'm actually concerned it is doing a worse job, in important ethical ways, than a hand colourist. But I've explained elsewhere.

Colourisation cannot be done accurately from a black and white image without context that is almost always lacking. Hand colouring is less dishonest.
How is that solar shade coming along?[10]
https://archive.is/M6S83
"Will be?" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction
Weird this was syndicated onto BBC also

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36236444
I worked for a cable company in the mid-90s. The amount of boxes that disappeared (and couldn't be located) was insane. The folks that procured them also used a "bullet blocker" (basically a resistor) to avoid the box being disabled.

In the satellite realm, DishNetwork was always the easier service to hack. The FTA scene was completely overrun with folks buying 3rd party tuners. Once Dish switched to an encrypted signal, a few vendors (nFusion if I recall) even could rotate keys in a matter of hours to decrypt Dish's new encryption schemes. I doubt any of that works these days simply because there's no reason to push too hard for content that is likely available via easier means.
Of course the citations should be lost (not counted).

But the paragraph is about collaboraters being angry and frustrated. And they seem to be angry at those who faked the data. Which is understandable.

You would hope that this would also mean that collaborators getting their name on a paper would put a little more effort into scutinizing the data provided by co-authors.

Maybe it is just a little to easy to work on paper and just accept the underlying data without asking any questions.
nah, i really did meant disingenuous, but you are correct it is not my place to postulate on what you think or know. i apologize.

you are also correct that i do not agree with you opinion; it is a well established 'standard'

you're pointing out people complain that web forms don't support it but that is not an issue with the providers, just the implementation of those forms(or their backends)
So basically if your company name starts withan X and have a user there, start looking for a contingency plan when he snaches yours.
Related:

GNU Units - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25657311 - Jan 2021 (203 comments)
Thank you! We're working on integrating external browsing using another agent. For now we do have link processing, so if you drop a publicly accessible link in the issue, Sweep will actually gather context from that link.

You can give Sweep docs about a framework and it should help a lot.
Claiming that BMI is flawed is a lazy half-argument. Finish the argument, what should be used instead of BMI? Look at the correlation plots and draw your own BMI line [0]. I think the BMI lines look pretty good for men, but for women who fall into the common BMI range of 25 to 30, the BMI formula tends to underestimate the amount of body fat.

It would be nice if everyone could get a DEXA scan regularly, but the data shows that 50% of people would find that they have even more body fat than the BMI charts predict. Again, it's worse for women, most women near the overweight threshold would find that their body fat is higher than expected.

[0]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2877506/
Abstract

>Decades of work in rodents suggest that movement is a powerful driver of hippocampal low-frequency “theta” oscillations. Puzzlingly, such movement-related theta increases in primates are less sustained and of lower frequency, leading to questions about their functional relevance. Verbal memory encoding and retrieval lead to robust increases in low-frequency oscillations in humans, and one possibility is that memory might be a stronger driver of hippocampal theta oscillations in humans than navigation. Here, neurosurgical patients navigated routes and then immediately mentally simulated the same routes while undergoing intracranial recordings. We found that mentally simulating the same route that was just navigated elicited oscillations that were of greater power, higher frequency, and longer duration than those involving navigation. Our findings suggest that memory is a more potent driver of human hippocampal theta oscillations than navigation, supporting models of internally generated theta oscillations in the human hippocampus.
Nintendo can garnish a dude's wages to the tune of $10M for the rest of his life for IP violations but we can't put the screws on a phone scammer that steals from our grandmothers? Sheesh.
I absolutely love Erlang. It’s a succinct, powerful, amazingly well-thought-out system design with a VM that is very complementary.

I just can’t get past all the extra verbosity of Elixir, but this writeup gives me hope that someday I will.
How are updates handled, is it doing a merge on read ?
Good. They should tough it out and grow a pair—of lungs, that is. Living in an aquatic environment has made all the fish grow soft. Time to evolve like the rest of us did.

(More seriously, warm ocean dead spots affect more than just fish: I suspect we’ll see a further decline in marine mammals too, for example.)
And because the impact is exponentially larger. Arguments for regulation prohibiting individuals from tinkering with their cars does no such thing, because those laws are not currently in place, and there is not an epidemic of runaway user-modified vehicles.

On the other hand, such regulation would serve to prevent users from enjoying the property they purchased and to facilitate exploitative practices by manufacturers and retailers. It is all the more absurd given that existing law already provides mechanisms for deterrence and punishment, namely: the notion of negligence.

I cannot stress how terrible this idea is. This would severely degrade consumer rights and do virtually nothing to protect people.
Intelligence and goodwill towards others are often conflated by the good-hearted, whereas people are not always motivated by lovingkindness - and surely not always in the case of self-made superbillionaires.
Deliberate ambiguous headline.

Long hours on the internet doing what? Comparing themselves with others or learning STEM?
I'm not asking what's the conceptual difference, I just don't get what the two options are. Is #2 one-time purchase and #3 subscription?
And what is your read about number of people who prefer where they live? If two groups of people have contradictory desires, then elections are the best way to sort out the differences and reach a compromise.

> It's illegal to build a walkable neighborhood

Big cities like NYC or Chicago are already walkable.

> in most of the country.

I am sure you can go build a walkable city in the middle of Nevada or Nebraska. Your problem is something else - nobody wants to go there yet so it is a bootstrapping problem. What you are essentially saying is "a lot of neighborhoods where the jobs are are controlled by NIMBYs and they are not letting us convert those to walkable areas"
Both of these are arbitrary choices, but trans doesn't sound like a medical issue. I will die on this hill, cis is a poor choice.