skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, wars are not simple. Fog of war may make it blurry, or enemy may fool each other. For example, soviets shelled their own territory in Finnish war, to pretend that they were attacked first, so they are defending. Russians are using same thing too: they blown up their own buildings to blame Chechen and then started second Chechen war, or, in case of Russo-Ukrainian war, they pretend that Ukraine will be swallowed by NATO and then European and American homosexuals will freely fuck Russian-speaking Ukrainian children, so Russians are invaded to protect Ukrainians!

However, this should not alter your moral compass. Those, who defend themselves, have moral rights to wipe the attackers or invaders.
YBCO superconducts as high as about 93K, so we're talking 17K difference. Which is useful but not wildly so. LN2 boils at 77K, for reference.
I have had great success with this recipe and a pressure cooker.
When did they use an incomplete, pre release, version of Apple Maps for tech journalism marketing?

They didn’t. So not a counter example.
Can be reduced

customElements.define('like-button', class LikeButton extends HTMLElement {
connectedCallback() {
this.innerHTML = '<button></button>'
this.addEventListener('click', this.onClick, true)
}
onClick() {
this.innerText = 'You liked this'
}
})
One of the main points of the project was for security reasons.

Updates to the Chrome browser build for ChromeOS came out later than the standard Linux/Windows/Mac Chrome builds because the special chromeos build needed time to be integrated/tested with the rest of ChromeOS.

With LaCros, the browser can be updated independently from the rest of the OS.
Yeah that's a great idea. Would be a good excuse to learn about fine-tuning Llama2. Although corrupting with simple Gaussian noise might not be "hard" enough to help it learn how to recognize something like this:

https://archive.org/details/royalnavyhistory01clow/page/402/...

properly, which has specks/spots, parts that are much lighter/fainter, printing errors, etc.
A little late to the party but…

> They could even control how much you can buy and what strength it is to ensure overdoses are rare.

There’s two concerns in that statement to be aware of:

- Opiate tolerance is wild. Doses that would kill a naive opiate user can have very small effects on experience users. This is why relapse can be such an overdose problem: while people are using, they develop significant tolerance. Then they decide to get clean. Then they relapse and take a dose that used to be ok for them, but is now way too much and OD.

- As soon as start trying to put limits on access, you’re going to start having black market issues again. My only experience is with legal weed in Canada, but you can readily go to the store and buy an ounce (dose-wise, if you consider 10mg of THC to be one dose that’s about 560 doses). If you could only buy, say, a gram at a time (10-20 “doses”, or maybe 2-3 joints), the black market would pop right back up again because it would be more convenient than having to go to the store every couple days.

I appreciate the thought process, but you unfortunately have to be really careful about balancing safety with convenience if you want to stamp out the black market. Analogously, for a time Netflix was just straight up more convenient than trying to find torrents for TV shows; now that there’s 17 different streaming services that all offer some overlapping subset of all the others, it has gotten significantly less convenient than it was.
That is a work of art, and also you have to appreciate the author’s commitment to the bit.
Thanks for that amazing in-depth explanation! I can see why people would prefer it for component based frameworks.
From 2008 there was How to Build a Person by John Pollock. I don't recall whether he included some putative "explainer" disciplined by other components.
It is apparently extremely difficult to fabricate LK-99 and most of the time the process being used creates similar substances but without appropriate Cu substitution in its lattice. All of the videos have been of generally quite small samples and the manufacturing difficulty is the purported reason.

The SK also supposedly had more details on this but with the leak of the paper those haven't been cleaned up and added to the paper.
More people should read this. A few weeks back some commenter on another thread was saying it makes perfect sense to break a sensor if you had more than one in order to get more certainty. Facepalm.
Bitcoin's Role in the ESG Imperative
Lit seems functionally equivalent to Svelte. Might Lit only be better if you have a preference towards declaring classes? Perhaps tracing back to Backbone or React before hooks?

Svelte supports custom elements: https://svelte.dev/docs/custom-elements-api
Meta: hey look at us! We are doing cool things! We were doing metaverse VR stuff way before Apple! Lol.
Ask HN: What plotting tools should I invest in learning?
I often need to plot data, generate a quick histogram, etc in the course or my working day. I often fall back on using whatever facilities are offered by a spreadsheet app.

What are your favorite plotting tools for quick data exploration at the command line? Do you use different and more general tools for publication or presentations?

Which plotting tool or tools are worth mastering?
Also, I've seen ALL these prototypes already. They didn't just do this. It's a slow drip of old research. If they were making these headsets available for purchase at a price normal people could afford I might give a shit.
Agree - someone that's dead has no freedom at all.
In the latter case, that seems like it just wouldn't be such a big deal, right? Since the hit would only happen user side and be a small percentage of the user's time on the site?

I get that they don't want to "take the blame" but it seems like both parties are performing reasonable actions that butt heads but that one party resolves that by just not performing the service. To me that feels like a worse outcome than slow service, as it just looks like the site is down.

The next naive question I have is about the response of truncation. I understand Cloudflare is preserving privacy. Archive says that privacy is preserved because they truncate the PII. Is this truncation verifiable in the request from Cloudflare? If not, then this seems like an unreasonable expectation ("just trust me bro"). Again, personally I'd rather have the latency hit and I'm not sure I'm seeing a good argument against this.
Interpersonal Emotion Regulation
I missed that project hash bit. Well. At least the tracking is disable-able.
From previous discussions, it seems that Arch ARM was not providing a reliable base for Asahi, so Fedora will be the new primary base for Asahi Linux.
> The traditional advantages that a man has enjoyed over the centuries are gradually losing in importance

Like the privilege of dying in wars, working in coal mines, and working the trades that kill your back by the time you're 45 (50 if you're lucky).

Amazing. Do you honestly believe you're starting a good faith discussion when opening with this?

Some men enjoyed more privilege in the past, which was absolutely more than balanced out by the vast majority of men getting the shit end of the stick. Now it's just slightly less pronounced, because the whore world is high on exploiting hydrocarbons.
Riiight. That's probably why we stopped doing exit polls, after many double digit discrepancies in 2016.
I actually suspect you’re describing what I’d consider a suboptimal future state, but it’s hard to tell because most of these words are pretty vague.

Like, what exactly is “mob rule”? Why am I supposed to fear it? Why is it worse than today’s system of rule by a powerful unaccountable minority?

Why is it per se good for the police to enforce laws and fight crime? Those are both social constructs that can target anyone we want them to. 60 years ago, they would have prevented me from marrying my wife; 90 years ago, they would have prevented me from fleeing genocide.

What happens in your ideal future state if the rich and powerful refuse to change unjust laws? If people rise up against oppression, what happens?
"Trusted by over 30,000 businesses, investors, and analysts"

I doubt these numbers.
For a lot of people, they are most interested in the recognition and achievement. You are basically saying "you may be a footnote as someone that should have won, if the others weren't caught cheating years later." Right? I can see how that is less than comforting. (Especially so with no way of knowing who all is actively cheating at the time.)

I can't say it is a bad idea to try, mind you. It could very well work. I just have my doubts.
The general maxim I always use is “Apple is a Design company.”

They ship hardware & software, but their core product feature for each is the design of it. Both individually and as a whole ecosystem.

It’s actually kind of incredible they’ve done so well at this after Jobs & Ive left. Speaks to their culture.
Yeah, if multiple companies are underbidding the winner will still not have enough money to build a network.
Factorio had blueprints wayyyyy before DSP.
It's a relatively new feature, see

https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/1773
For me it did block the full screen.
Or just a door that opens like doors should.
The cognitive dissonance is dripping off of these sorts of articles. I used to read 500+ Guardian articles per year but they're basically ragebait at this point unfortunately..
I think we have similar priorities, I just find github to be an extremely poor predictor of on-the-job communication.
Was checking this out yesterday, the branching feature is pretty cool (if it's not possible already, I'd recommend an admin-level setting so that branches immediately have custom sql executed against them help teams redact/anonymise dev/staging branches.

Would consider this for a new hobby project but am jumpy when it comes to new vendor risk. Would need to see a comparison with Aurora RDS serverless v2. Maybe AWS will acquire them to help intro scale-to-zero natively within AWS.
> It makes no sense why such ephemeral concepts should somehow lead to better investments.

What specifically do you find ephemeral about ESG?
These fraud prevention actions are nothing new sadly.

Apple does it, Google does it, your bank does it and you’ll never receive any details because they all heavily lean on security through obscurity, out of fear that any information might be helpful to game and circumvent detection.

In the case of online services it’s also partially because they don’t know if they’re dealing with the scammer or the legitimate account holder and they don’t care to setup a process to do identity verification.

The only difference is that with a bank you usually at least get your money (although Revolut has shown to not even do that in certain cases), with services you can pound sand because nothing is owned and it’s all based on licenses that can be revoked at any time for no reason.

That’s why the small claims revenge fantasy is so silly, nothing will come of it. Yeah sure ToS don’t trump law, but the law has shown time and time again that it’s entirely ok with revoking licenses for pretty much any reason conceivable, because licenses aren’t held in the same regard as property rights.

So far, every example I’ve seen with Apple has been a case in which the person redeemed thousands of dollars of gift cards, triggering the fraud algorithm in the process. A few of them managed to get their account reinstated by emailing the executive team.
This is the first case I’ve seen in which the person insists that this isn’t the case and that they’ve done nothing to trigger the fraud algorithm.

As an outsider I don’t have the details either way, but I’d be more concerned about the loss of data than the monetary value of purchases, if only because those can be charged back without worrying about the consequences (which normally be the closure of the Apple ID).

I’d also reach out to the executive team, mainly because I have good experiences with them myself.

Whatever the case, this is a risk that isn’t going to go away soon when dealing with companies.
And my reply still stands, if not read for signs of an adversary, you would read a comment that reinforces (B) of the (A) and (B) you offered people to reply with. Its for gambling addicts
Meta has a god-awful reputation and needs to do whatever they can to build goodwill with journalists and the public. If they think showing off half-finished vaporware is the way to do that, good luck to them.
This is funny, it reads like safety thinking in cars in the 1950s.
A thousand hugs and thank you’s to the team behind this. I’ve been waiting for this very thing!!! And once more and more devs get this going they’ll be more likely to have more work being reverse engineered and added to keep Linux on the m series going for years and years!

Edit: the reason I’m stoked I because fedora is the distro of Linux that I run on everything.
I don't have time to watch an hour and a half long interview, can you give a tl:dw?
You’re a bit biased if you think Meta is doing anything other than marketing here, just using a different tactic.

Meta has never showed off demo-able advanced R&D hardware publicly, even when they’ve had it, until now.

This is simply a second degree demo to Wall Street investors. Their analysts will either attend, or read reports from reputable experts.

They’ve sunk $40 Billion into this project with nothing to show. Apple has reportedly spent $20 Billion while underpinning it with healthy growth and profits.

Facebook shipped Quest 2 dev kits to partners that were physically disguised as clothing irons. The narrative you’re spinning is nonsense.

EDIT: You’re either Boz or a lieutenant judging by your comment history.

You only comment on topics related to Facebook competition and say things close to “interesting feedback” and occasionally expose yourself with specific phrases like “Thanks for sharing, it's always interesting to hear these kind of anecdotes!”
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36351422
Also the first transatlantic cables terminated there. Once that started, a lot of cross country fiber wanted to locate there too. Once ghat starts, a lot of other fiber wants to interconnect with existing cables.

Once critical mass was achieved it became much easier to build data centers there. Everyone knows how to do it. Power companies are used to requests for redundant power. There’s talent to build and maintain them…
What specific Hartford versions are you referencing? A previous post was talking about how impressed they were with Wizard, and you’re saying Hartford is even better? You’ve got me curious! Hopefully it’s available in ggml
Will someone think of the children?!
I wonder how the intentional noise in GPS handled this. The point was for other forces to not have it for combat purposes. But, it seems like even a mediocre inertial navigation system, speedometer, or airspeed sensor combined with a Kalman filter and GPS would be very accurate.

Calculating position from velocity is very accurate, but suffers from drift. GPS does not. I wonder how accurate you can get with 1% variance velocity measurement and 100m variance GPS measurement on something doing 500km/h.
For random, quick and dirty, ad-hoc plotting tasks my default is GNUPlot[1].

Otherwise I tend to use either Python with matplotlib, or R with ggplot2.

I keep saying I'm going to invest the time to properly learn D3[4] or something similar for doing web-based plotting, but somehow never quite seem to find time to do it. sigh

[1]: http://www.gnuplot.info/

[2]: https://matplotlib.org/

[3]: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/

[4]: https://d3js.org/
ESG is such a obvious scam. It would be like this:

Wife: Have you been cheating on me?

Husband: Lets check my APS score.

Wife: What?

Husband: Adultery, Pushups and Soccer Watching score. Looks like I'm in the 1% of husbands as calculated by the experts. So I don't think you have anything to worry about.
You will own nothing and be happy.

Edit: I know passenger, I just wanted to point out the absurdity of requiring intimate familiarity with a door to be able to open it, extending to drivers. Think car sharing pools etc, something the future will have more of.

Next up - in the next firmware update after fully self-driving, comes fully self-opening door!
Both are anthropomorphizations, implying some kind of "thought" process which doesn't exist.

The generated text is wrong, false, inaccurate. I don't think we really need a jargon-y term for it.
If I do

config = dd()

config.users.foo = 'bar'
config.users = ‘baz’

Is config.users turned into a string and config.users.foo is lost? Or is the equal symbol mapped to something cleverer than assignment?
The infamous coin toss
HackerOne is primarily a bug bounty company which is different from pentest (they offer that too but it's not well established). This is probably in response to other companies not having as big of budgets for bug bounty which no doubt took a hit with all these layoffs over the last year.
see this other comment[0] its most likely a translation issue

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36975492
The performers get paid up-front for the performance. This typically costs the author somewhere in the neighborhood of $10K to $40K including production costs.

Amazon originally paid out 70% like most other digital goods purveyors. Once they cornered the market they arbitrarily pushed it down to 25% (you only get 40% if you agree not to sell anywhere else). This means that for many authors, especially indie authors, they lose money publishing the audio version of their book.
>and applications (like levitating a train) require too many amps for our poor wire to remain a special wire. (Most super conductive materials lose conductivity when amps are too high).

I was wondering if there was a current limit on superconductors.

1) Is there any understanding as to why superconductivity breaks down at higher amperage?
2) If so, is there any explanation as to why that doesn't require a PhD in physics?
The problem isn’t running your own infrastructure. It’s the extortionate rent for the big tech infrastructure and the anticompetitive DRM lock in.

If there was a competitive ecosystem of client software and hardware and also online stores and it all interoperated, we would have a lot more choice, control of our purchased media and devices, and lower prices too.
The problem is that the moment you call something a "pumpkin", the English think it's cow food and refuse to eat it. But they'll happily eat butternut, which is a pumpkin really.
Just grab a template and ask ChatGPT to fill it out for you. That’s all this is doing.
i really don't understand what point you are trying to make.

can you elaborate?
The nice thing is that if you're using a library like Lit or Svelte, you won't have to bother with the web component API much at all. https://svelte.dev/docs/custom-elements-api https://lit.dev/
Very doubtful as running random binaries under ChromeOS would defeat the entire security model for ChromeOS.
Without discussion of grammars, I think you're lost in the sauce on this.

> You need a system that has knowledge and a world model and common-sense reasoning, etc. When you're doing nothing but "predict the next token based on statistical patterns" then yeah, you're going to get hallucinations.

Arguably, LLMs already have this. They can do impressive reasoning already. The problem may be that the way they encode all that is untenable. Imagine trying to describe a car in terms of its individual pieces (tires, suspension, engine). Then imagine trying to do that in terms of its molecules. Uh oh. Then its atoms. Even worse.

> How much will it cost?

To describe a car in terms of atoms? Infinite cost. We can barely even get a baby fruit fly's connectome (total brain schematic) read and stored somewhere. A car is much bigger.

It may be that LLMs are structured such that they're trying to encode all that common sense reasoning in terms of atoms, and a fundamentally different grammar is necessary to go up to parts.

Whether this is the case is still being debated. If it is the case, you'll see LLMs near a ceiling of diminishing returns.

> How much will it cost?

To figure out how to do LLMs with more expressive grammars? Unknown. I think that'd take a qualitative breakthrough in AI, and I think LLMs are just the result of a quantitative breakthrough (we're still doing the old, non-clever stuff; we're just doing it faster than ever before thanks to continued growth in GPU compute power; more monkeys on typewriters than ever before!). I don't think we've had much in the way of qualitative breakthroughs since the AI winter.
Honestly Apple should open up the hardware specs and make this easier for devs because I wasn’t in the market for an m1 mini if it was going to run macOS but now with my favorite distro with a remix available?! I’ll give Apple my duckets
Sure but the Vision Pro uses eye tracking and foveated rendering to simulate planes of view
You can remove the guesswork. You can start with a high resolution (or even raster export of a vector image for an extreme example), downsample it (various methods and downsampling factors for completeness), then attempt to upscale it.
Good link. And perhaps to be even less misleading above, LLM Confabulation. As another comment says, not fixable within the LLM.
> The thing is: I couldn't care less about their culture. I'm well past the stage of caring whether a company values X or Y or Z.

It doesn’t sound like you’re flexible. You’re pretty set in your ways about disliking every company’s culture and acting like you can mold yourself to be who they want. What if they don’t want people who have to mold themselves to be X, Y, or Z?

Hard to imagine anybody less flexible and easygoing than that.

> ("You have no personal preferences? Weird")

I wouldn’t worry about this too much. Easygoing people who are productive and efficient usually have a lot of trouble coming up with people willing to be references for them.
When you mean other articles, are you talking about this author?
meanwhile Im like...

<button onclick="innerHTML++">1</button>
Why Europe can't walk away from China
At least Stanford's rules were retracted.

About hip hip, I ended up looking into that when I saw it back then. The connection to the early 1800s riots was made by a single journalist back then, and it was most likely false. More importantly, nobody really makes that connection unless they're trying to.
This is no different than an online high interest savings account. Compare the rate to banks like Ally.
On the prospect of working on a "Uranium-Engine"

> Every layman can see that these ideas are exceedingly important. Hence there won't be any money in it. You only make money on ideas which have escaped the general public. If you invent something like artificial rubies for the watch-making industry, you'll make more money than with the Uranium-Engine

After hearing news of the bomb

> That shows at any rate that the Americans are
capable of real cooperation on a tremendous scale. That
would have been impossible in Germany. Each one said
that the other was unimportant.
Uber makes first operating profit
>Say what you will, the 27th Amendment passed.

Sure, but the Congress that approved it never felt its consequences because it took another 200 years for it to become ratified. So the first group it affected was definitely not the same group that voted for it.
Iirc some of the vehicles in the Las Vegas tunnel are Model Ys. Hopefully they are the ones equipped with rear manual releases, because they're taking passengers in the back regularly and in the event of a fire the chips are already stacked against them.
I was showing some Skinny Puppy videos from the late 80s and early 90s to a millennial and she commented that the interesting thing about them was that they were leaning in to their mental illness, anxiety and depression to produce great art. That doesn't really happen these days. Everyone is so medicated they are just all robots and they don't have these strong emotional forces driving their creativity in those directions.