skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Chicago almost never dumps sewage into the lake anymore. Haven’t yet this year even with all the major storms.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel_and_Reservoir_Plan
TL:DR

-

Avoid projects without a business model because they will sometimes fail when they implement it

-

That's an extremely bad take.

I mean, sure, the stability of corporate systems is what the price gets you but often project becomes just profitable if the business model is great (even if paying for something was once free is never a pain free move)

And without the most important part , you can be how much predatory you want if you are indispensabile.

Looking at you Pantone, who put a subscription behind your colors in the paid Adobe subscription
This comment is the opposite of the spirit of hacker news. Please don’t be disrespectful.
The Chinese invented cannons about the time they invented gun power. However by coincidence their forts used stone walls thick enough to resist cannon fire and so it was not really better than the various catapult systems they also had (which also couldn't breach their fort walls).

https://acoup.blog/2021/12/17/collections-fortification-part... Goes into this in more detail for a couple paragraphs.
For now, you could run Hocuspocus as a separate service and write an extension that connects to your application. In our Cloud (https://tiptap.dev/cloud) we send webhooks, so you can process changes or store documents on your side as well.
I think we're missing part of the equation there.

Decriminalization isn't legalization. Legalization would mean controlling purity, and strength where the drug is licensed to be sold.

Marijuana legalization hasn't lead to any major problems. People don't even bother getting it on the black market anymore where it is legal. They go for what's convenient.

Beyond that simply throwing people in prison doesn't mean that we reduced the number of drug addicts. It just means you don't see them anymore.

Decriminalization actually would mean you see more of them out on the streets because they're not being locked away in prison.

Drugs will always be a part of the human experience. People will continue to use them whether it's legal or not.

The other side of it is most cities don't spend much money on harm reduction strategies or treatment options because of the stigma associated with drug users. Tax payers look at them as subhuman and don't do the math.

It costs more to let a drug addict run around town stealing and breaking things, or getting sick and going to the ER, than it does to mandate they spend some time in a State funded mental hospital.

Prisons also cost a lot. It costs a full time job's worth of money ~35k to imprison 1 person per year.

Not only did you take a potential worker out of the work force, but now you're sinking a full time jobs worth of money into keeping them in prison.

For a murderer, that seems worth it because they literally cost the world a full time worker and maybe more. But for a homeless drug addict it really doesn't seem worth it to me.
when i took econ, there were a host of gva shenanigans that made it amply clear how asset values null out. canonical question - when you marry your cook, what happens to gdp ?
accepted textbook answer - gdp goes down because cook was paid income to cook your food. now she is your wife. if your wife cooks food for you there is no transaction. no invoice. no line item. gross value added has gone to zero.therefore gdp goes down. but you are still eating! well, cause the person who’s doing the cooking now is your wife, not a paid cook.
I don’t have any evidence to back this feeling up so take it with a grain of salt: San Francisco has a drug problem simply because it’s one of few places in the country where it’s safe to have a drug problem. Other states pay for addicts/homeless to be shipped off to California and all of a sudden it becomes our taxpayer problem.

If drugs were legalized country-wide then SF wouldn’t have the concentration it does and it would seem like a nice place.
Scaling Your Product Org
Right, it all begins with studying where they're coming from since they're in everything from fire suppression foam to floss. I'd imagine companies like DuPoint are dumping insane amounts of them as byproducts of industrial processes, and would love for us to go all plastic straw on goretex shoes to let them squeeze a couple more billion of profits out of their established processes.

RE: HN, it has grown and been redditified a bit, rash downvoting, sarcastic non-sequiturs all abound.
Oh it's just like some arbitrary limitation, like the search function only goes so far back, or something. No clue, I haven't narrowed down the exact factors that determine whether my search will get a result or not
Fleetio | Full-time | 100% REMOTE - open to candidates in the USA, CANADA & MEXICO | We can transfer H-1B visas | https://www.fleetio.com/careers/engineering | Fleetio is a modern software platform that helps thousands of organizations worldwide manage a fleet of vehicles. Founded in 2012, Series C just announced, 5k+ customers, 35+M in ARR, 215+ employees, 4.5 rating on Glassdoor. Company perks: Competitive pay + equity + 5% ARR bonus, 401(k) + match, health, vision & dental insurance, remote working culture (since 2012), fitness incentive, professional development budget + equipment stipend.

HIGHLIGHTED ROLES (More available on our careers site):

-- Director, Talent Acquisition: https://apply.workable.com/fleetio/j/2AD4A30283/

-- Android Engineer: https://apply.workable.com/fleetio/j/15AEF2271E/

-- Quality Engineer: https://apply.workable.com/fleetio/j/9978948646/
I did share it in a separate thread, but I developed an adaptation of the logit biasing idea that directly integrates identity proof into the language model output. I think it very directly addresses the challenge of language/diffusion model authenticity.

github.com/HNx1/IdentityLM
You can lead a horse to water but sometimes that horse will do everything it can to indignantly die of dehydration while trying to kick you.
I'd had Miyazaki's films on my watchlist for years, and when we found out we were expecting our first kiddo (now 3 years old), I decided to wait to watch any of them so that I could watch them, for the very first time, with her (well, "them" now, on account of our second kiddo).

I'd love to see suggestions from folk around which film might be a great first choice, I'll probably give that a go this week.

Edit: Thanks for the suggestions, everyone! :)
I took it as saying "they usually jump in too early, so this is a refreshing change of pace."
Isn’t it better for billionaires to be political leaders than career bureaucrats, academics, or bartenders?
> Rephrased: Meta starts process to leave Canadian news sites alone (eg: stop scraping sites for content).

Not sure what your purpose here is but when you share an article on facebook, you usually get "the title", a leading picture, and occasionally a summary. Now you'll just get an unprocessed URL. It doesn't copy the article verbatim into feeds as you have described.

Now it will just push through links as links. That seems fine as well. I like the fact that you can present or not present content, for whatever terms are negotiated.
There are some cases of human children that, either by neglect or some unfortunate freak accident, end up being in the company of wild animals from a very young age. In some of those cases, the child was never able to adapt once it had been rescued.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_child
That would likely be addressed by vacuum deposition techniques.
FWIW strip mining operations till materials for ~6 PPM gold.
Maybe SystemE? https://github.com/a-schaefers/systemE
Yup. SiteJabber gives them a 1.87 out of 5 stars rating.
Qdrant https://qdrant.tech | Remote - US Timezone only | Full-time

DevOps Cloud Engineer

https://join.com/companies/qdrant/8765929-cloud-platform-dev...
I haven't started my career yet. :(
In that case it would be very similar but pick is more general then the shorthand object literal syntax, it can be used with nested index lika .a.b.c or any expression like pick(if .a then .b else .c end) but both has it uses i think.
> An eyewitness interviewed by Indy Week alleged that Durham council member DeDreana Freeman had attempted to strike Durham Mayor-pro tempore and council member Mark-Anthony Middleton during the shouting session, but instead struck O'Neal once and punched the head of fellow Durham council member Leonardo Williams twice before Williams subdued her. In the aftermath of these incidents, O'Neal announced that she would not seek re-election as Mayor and a state investigation was opened into the extortion allegation (Holsey-Hyman denies the alleged extortion attempt and a separate allegation that she ordered city employees to perform campaign work on her behalf).

Wtf. That alone is wild, open brawls in parliament are usually something associated with dysfunctional democracies. Attempting to censor that and invite the Streisand effect? That's new. If you decide to throw fists in politics, at least don't attempt to contradict the evidence. JFC.
Crossover, yet, but it hardly qualifies as an SUV. Its overall profile is closer to a medium size sedan with a hatchback. What was once called a 5-door. If the hatch were more vertical it would be closer to traditional station wagons.

Yes, Ford markets it as an SUV because that terms appeals to a wider market and most people don’t know what a crossover is.
Some people don’t have personal growth just because time passes. Maybe that’s true for this person.
Location: Cornwall, UK

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Web, JS, React, Ruby, Frontend/Backend

Résumé/CV: andrewvos.com

Email: andrew@andrewvos.com
The definition of monopoly from econlib: A monopoly is an enterprise that is the only seller of a good or service.

The definition of a copyright is an exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, perform, etc an original work for a set period of time. It may include one or more additional rights depending on jurisdiction.

So by definition a copyright holder is the only seller of a creative work, aka they have a monopoly on that works public usage, which is very broadly defined.

I mean, you can draw your own conclusion but if you expect me to believe you aren't drawing with crayons you need to retract your previous statement.

Side note: what makes you think the writers own the copyright on their work? Generally they don't especially if they are paid to write something rather than presenting a finished work to multiple studios trying to sell it. You do havr the general definition of monopsony close to right but it had nothing to do with whether another part of the value chain is a monopoly, you can have both or many instances of both along a dingle products value chain.
I read the title too quickly and thought "Alcohol related deaths during sex in the US" and was like hmmm....
At least prices have been coming down in Austin. Same needs to happen in CA, but there are going to be a lot of bitter and distressed home owners.
The design of activity feeds is very similar in a way.
> What are they doing?!

Trying to make ad money with views, which is their profit incentive.

Mouse models are nearly always spun as applicable to humans, which an average, aging, viewer would be interested, usually relating to "Cure <ailment>", "regrow limbs", "stop aging", etc.

The average viewer isn't interested in superconductors, and the 10 seconds the news orgs have for each bit of news isn't enough to explain them.
Drugs have destroyed many societies and we look like we’re allowing it to happen to us.
Some places on the East coast have both harsh winters and harsh summers. So you could argue, an extra 6 months.
Why a throwaway account for this? It honestly makes me immediately question your take.
> Hold companies fiscally responsible for cleanup

3M is filing for bankruptcy due to PFAS litigation, and even then they can't cover the costs [0] This doesn't work, the damage is already done, and the profits have been pocketed. What's worse with PFAS for environmental pollution is that no mechanism for clean up currently exists.

> criminally charge the decision makers for cases of negligence.

Might work as a weak extrinsic motivator, but there's plenty of "hot potato" going in this kind of work. It's also hard to prove negligence when the "decision makers" are ignoring the environmental costs through either wilful ignorance, burring their own research, or through optimistic interpretations which give them plausible deniability - combine that with shared responsibility and it gets hard to point the finger at individuals unless you were in the room. It's hard to pin down a "decision" of inaction.

We either need some kind of intrinsic motivators, i.e make it in the interest of corporations to protect the environment. Or really heavy legislation that requires extensive proof of ecological safety for every new chemical dumped into the environment rather than the current "we'll figure it out later" model.

[0] https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/3m-head...
Almost all of the stories in major newspapers are commissioned ("pitched") by interest groups that want to see that article published. It's why a lot of articles contain quotes from weirdly specific people with middle-office titles in specific organizations. Journalists aren't cold calling random office workers to get these quotes. An outline of an article is provided, journalists do some minimal fact-checking and write it out into a proper article. Beat writers that cover a specific topic regularly and have made their own contacts in that field are an exception.
You need to read some books on how governments actually function. The purpose of government is to be able to run on stooges.

And many of them are motivated and decent human beings interested in making a difference in as many lives as possible. You don't have to be so angry at them.
> if prices adjust to what they actually cost to produce (a tiny fraction of street price)

Nothing. Absolutely nothing is priced at “actual costs to produce.” Nothing. I wish it were the case though maybe one day.
VS22 > jetbrains is surprising to me. Care to share why? I'm also curious why Linux is so far down and windows is your favourite.
We have built a society where the best options for these people are to do what they are doing. Nobody starts using because they have a great life but they’re just curious what a bit of meth feels like and then accidentally get hooked. They do it because there’s no better life path open to them. It’s really a form of suicide. Criminalizing will make the suicide process faster and less visible to you. It won’t stop anyone from using but it will make using more dangerous. There is no easy solution. We need societal change. Making it illegal would be like criminalizing sugar because of the obesity epidemic.
CIA said 4 days RUS will be in Kiev! Honestly, CIA has one of the worst human intel. My only hope is these pot-heads in their hope of scoring some weed would actually learn the local languages.
I agree with your last point. How do we fix this problem though?
A lot of that is just anti-nuclear propaganda. Nuclear in France does not have major problems.
I meant to say DeepMind
What a bizzare opening. Offices aren't a endangered environment needing to be saved.
That’s why I feel like the author is trying to force a square peg into a round hole. WhatsApp is literally Facebook, but all my messages are end-to-end encrypted; I don’t feel like they’re tracking me the same way I do on Instagram. Meanwhile, plenty of people’s blogs have all sorts of nasty tracking shit. People love trying to fit things into dichotomies, but reality is always a lot messier.
LOL. How many bytes of CSS though? Have you tried something like the following?

<iframe src="https://news.ycombinator.com"></iframe>
"I see too many articles saying that Red Hat only have to provide source code to its customers - and the blog only implies that - but the Linux license requires more."

The GPL only applies when there is distribution (either in source or binary form) of a work covered by it. And it only applies between the parties involved in that distribution transaction. The GPL doesn't mandate that a covered work be distributed. The combination of these three aspects is critical.

Red Hat only distributes RHEL to its customers (it isn't available for anonymous download), therefore the GPL only mandates that Red Hat provide corresponding source code to their customers. The GPL also mandates that Red Hat allow its customers to redistribute any received binaries or source to anyone. Red Hat is free to decide who can be a customer, and to refuse to distribute some future version/modification of a GPL'ed work to an existing customer.

The meaning of "all third parties" in the GPL is confusing, but it's important to understand that the two parties of the license are the original author of the code and a recipient. In this context, the third parties are anyone to whom the recipient later distributes the work. Not anyone random that happens to approach the recipient asking for distribution to happen.

The term "any third parties" means the recipient cannot violate the terms of the GPL upon redistribution, no matter who it is distributing to. For example, it cannot ask that "third party" to forfeit its rights to redistribute the work it received.

In summary:

1. Red Hat can refuse to distribute a GPL'ed work to anyone - i.e. Red Hat can prevent the GPL from applying between them and anyone by avoiding any action that would trigger the GPL.

2. Once Red Hat distributes a GPL'ed work to someone, that someone can come back at any time in the future asking for the corresponding sources.

3. Red Hat does not prevent customers from redistributing the RHEL source code (they can't).

4. Having distributed some version of a GPL'ed work to someone does not force Red Hat to distribute a different version to that someone. See 1.
You can start by changing the narrative you tell yourself. No one said self narratives have to be 100% true..
Compile libtorch (C++) on M1 for app sandbox as static archive
A developer blog post
not to distract from your central point, but while the saturated fat in (unclarified) butter doesn't smoke like veg oil, the proteins in it do seem to burn up
I guess Michael Bloomberg has a lot of money invested in DC area commercial real estate.
That is true, yeah. But the library in question will also eventually break the existing API / stop supporting compatible releases with security patches. I assume this nginx config will still work for many releases in the future.
Isn't that sort of what I said? For some people the trade off is worth it, some it isn't. Academia BS vs corporate BS is just one of the aspects.
Samsara | Multiple Roles | Full-time, 100% Remote OR Hybrid In-Person/WFH (US & Canada) | Apply here: https://grnh.se/766dab941us

Samsara is the pioneer of the Connected Operations Cloud, which allows businesses and organizations that depend on physical operations to harness IoT (Internet of Things) data to develop actionable business insights and improve their operations. Samsara operates in North America and Europe and serves more than 20,000 customers across a wide range of industries including transportation, wholesale and retail trade, construction, field services, logistics, utilities and energy, government, healthcare and education, manufacturing and food and beverage. Learn more about Samsara's mission to increase the efficiency, safety, and sustainability of the operations that power the global economy at www.samsara.com.

Open Positions: Senior Software Engineer, Senior Firmware Quality Engineer, Staff Engineer (Mobile, Infrastructure, Telematics, Growth), Manager, Software Engineering, and more!
Places like the FBI used to have a specific number like you can’t have used marijuana more than 5 times. And then they’d polygraph you. But yes I knew people as well with normal TS clearances who had disclosed hard drugs but some intel organizations have stricter rules beyond that.
> How much synthetic content will be perceived as true and assumed to be correct simply because we haven't had time to adapt to the fact that the rate of synthetic content is exponential now.

That will be a problem for sure. But people believe all sorts of easy to debunk things already and that list is ever-expanding, so I don't know if there's any cure for it.

As far as content goes, I think human beings writing out boilerplate anything is something that's not long for this world.

Labor is a trickier one to judge, but I'm not too worried about a large negative impact in the immediate future.

People thought that modern appliances would usher in a new age of leisure, and the truth was that while they removed a lot of drudgery, work expanded to fill the vacuum and the percentage of the week spent laboring didn't significantly decrease.

On a positive note, I think the kind of work people are subject to now is better because of modern appliances, so I wouldn't be surprised if the same holds true for all the labor problems that can be handled by neural net / LLMs.
Cast iron on the gas stove is fine (by me). Cast iron on the electric with a cast iron tops is PITA for making something fast-and-once like fried/scrambled eggs. With something which takes a long time to make (like a stack of pancakes) you manage, mostly because they are made at the max t° anyway, but quick things suffer.
Most restaurants didn't offer delivery so there was less competition and the ones that did could keep in-house drivers busy. This meant only half the trip (restaurant->customer) had to be completed after the order was made. It also meant the driver-ready-vs-food-ready problem didn't exist.
The cuisines that offered delivery were also those optimized for delivery. Pizza and American Chinese travels much better than burgers and fries. Not only do they stand up better to sitting between being made and consumed but it's easier to count how many pizza boxes there are than make sure the burger also got its fries and side salad.
It's more like suppose you enter "I went to the shops yesterday". The model (right now the generation is relying on a bad model) will output something a bit like "Yesterday, I went shopping" or "I went shopping yesterday". Different output, but similar.
Fastmail is the opposite of the ProtonMail and Tutanota in terms of privacy and security. I wonder if it’s much different from the paid version of the Google’s email (where, I suppose, users’ data is not commercialized either).

Protonmail uses OpenPGP, so it better interfaces with other services.
Pre-Reagan.

“The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

-- John Ehrlichman, Nixon's domestic policy advisor, from an interview in 1994
>Falsehood 1: China poses the most serious long-term challenge to the international order and is undermining it.
I don't understand Californian sprawl. When I interviewed at google, I stayed at a hotel in sunnyvale. To do ANYTHING required a drive, because NOTHING is walking distance because EVERYTHING is six lanes wide with a divided median and a 400 car parking lot. It's insanity. Sunnyvale surely isn't the most populated and busy area I'm sure, but I can't understand making ANYTHING like that for anyone. It's so dystopic, needing a car to do anything.

It reminded me a lot of Florida actually. Everything built really flat and spread out, as if businesses can catch communicable diseases or something.