skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Pre internet you would do the same thing with your computer every day for 15 years and then buy a new one, you could load the same version of MS Word 15 years later no problem.

But when you're dealing with the rest of the world, a) you need to keep up, people send you Word n+15 compatible files, b) you want to access new websites, and c) you don't want to get hacked.

If you want to run your offline computer for 15 years, that still works today
There's this great YT channel of a guy who inherited his grandfather's metal shop, including a drafting table. He likes precision and proper drawings.

https://youtube.com/@InheritanceMachining
Looks like a serious upgrade in the B-spline workflow in sketches. This will be super handy when working on more organic designs.

Counterdrill hole (counterbore+countersink) is a nice convenience, have done that manually a few times before.

Hole to line and hole to hole constraints also good convenience, and cleans up sketch / makes design intent clearer. Previously that would need additional construction geometry and multiple constraints.
Cloud - the money-losing data center service. Probably gets sold to AWS

Your solution to breaking up a large monopoly is to boost another (quasi-)monopoly? I'd suggest that both Amazon and Microsoft should be prevented from taking over those assets.
I have a TI89 emulator on my phone, which I use often. It's a slightly outdated interface in the smartphone era, but for me it's still the most usable for certain things, particularly unit conversions, 2- or 3-variable RREF calculations, and small CAS calculations. I can do all those things in python, with more overhead, iff I'm at a computer.
Both. But perhaps also hiragana/katakana option too, like children’s book do when there is a kanji. Full on kanji is beyond me and I don’t expect to be able to pick it up just by seeing it in these conversations
I know this will age very fast but for the moment their X handle at the bottom of x.ai landing page still shows the old bird logo.
Most of what I have heard so far is somewhere inbetween.

Global rate range but adjusted to CoL to some extent. Cant pay someone 200k if someone else on the team only makes 20k because they live in a cheaper country.
> SMS is the only way to get 2fa with a dumb phone and without a physical 2fa token.

TOTP authenticator apps exist for J2ME, which is supported by phones as old as the Nokia 3330.

Example: https://github.com/baumschubser/hotpants
And now contrast that to all the families in Japan that do not exist because them.

War is ugly, strategic bombing never worked, proponents knew that (they saidnsouch in their own contemporary reports and statements, going as far as knowing strategic bombing of civilians was in deed a war crime). Nuclear bombs are a contiuation of of strategic bombing, and as strategic bombing goes, they were an unnecessary war crime.
I love this kind of projects, it reminded me a lot of Memorex by Smash TV [1]
I can totally see you put a lot of effort into this, congrats!

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAm1EU_pu80
The article says Chrome sabotaged JPEG XL.

I am saying that JPEG XL is a new format, which it is; any additional format that is supported means more code, more potential for bugs, more security issues (format parsing is one of the biggest sources of security issues).

Chrome had experimental support for it and then they dropped it. They still support PNG, normal JPEG.

I agree with the arguments against the current DRM and Manifest 3 content blocking was kind of misdirected (however… look at how Safari does it, it’s essentially the same)

Also I don’t think the same argument applies for Chrome as for OSes for example. You are not really locked in. Just use a different browser. It’s just web.
It took time to realize what "big C" could refer besides the obvious "Comsomol".
Structurally the same, though :)
This is a promise delivered to protect American manufacturers, who are committing to Indian production, from cheap (and security compromised) Chinese imports. It’s also a precursor to bootstrapping a Quad defence-manufacturing base.
Why LiveKit and EKS?
It helps that I live in Japan, so a non-online payment isn't too difficult to setup. I use one time use cashcards for the majority of online transactions.
I assure you there are still lots of projects that are not mega. Are you interpreting the question as only asking about using a calculator for your day job?

Imagine you're measuring something awkward for a home improvement project and you need to add several imperial lengths. That doesn't match any of your three cases.
Google was made possible by US antitrust turning a blind eye towards Google's acquisition of DoubleClick and YouTube. Considering Alphabet is dominating both search and ads and also offers services via searches, the EU commission already hinted at a breakup as a viable measure to lead the web out of its misery.

[1]: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_...
That makes sense, apologies for the misunderstanding. I feel like that goes without saying, though. I'm having a hard time imagining someone who is a happy fedora user saying they want to run something else on an M1 Mac
Thanks, putting it this way does help me understand a bit better. So a large number of repeated fair tosses can be broken down into a sequence of win-loss pairs, which are always =0.9.

The thing that still confuses me is, why the heck is the EV 1.05? It seems to be expressing something true - if you were to split your money into a thousand piles and "play" each individually, you make money overall.
Looks absolutely amazing, just the pricetag of 500$ seems a bit steep. To be fair though, people buying this probably assemble/sell a ton of PCBs so they can recoup that cost fairly easily. As a hobbyist it's sadly too expensive.
Okapi – API tests made as easy as table driven tests
okapi is a lightweight tool to help you write your own API Tests as easily as you would write your Unit Tests. Define your tests, payloads and expected results in json, run okapi, and you are done!

Tests make full use of all your cores by running in parallel by default (full sequential and file parallel modes also available). You can easily set up complex rules for expected results, capture previous results to reuse later, etc.

Last but not least, okapi offers a simple and easy to use API to integrate with your own software (okapi does not have any dependencies beside my other 350 LoC lib, go-clap that you can also find on my GitHub).
Awesome work! Is it based on stable diffusion with control net?
> Homeless people are a "nuisance and inconvenience" to the community. To argue otherwise is to be disingenuous.

Okay, it's pretty clear that you're discussing this from a place of ignorance and privilege. I suggest educating yourself better before engaging further on this subject.
> There are two types of people: Those who think VR will change the world—and those who haven’t tried it yet.

As someone who was hooked to VR the moment I put on an helmet, I seriously doubt VR will substantially change the world. The point of VR is to immerse people in a virtual world, but there is nothing beyond that
Well, you could do both :)

"You are using a slow browser, please upgrade to Firefox for a fast experience"

Okay, perhaps that is a bit underhanded, but you get the idea.
Red Hat will sell you support contracts for up to 10, more if you pay them enough and promise not to talk about it. That Ubuntu isn't as business focused as Red Hat is... Well, there's a reason Red Hat is a billion dollar company and Ubuntu isn't. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Their PC came with Internet Explorer. It was Java (that almost everyone had to download at some point) that came with Chrome.
Fluorescent tubes FTW (also soon to be banned for this use):

https://www.bitchute.com/video/adBl9klR1E6g/
What would you think the problem with Firefox' UX that keeps so many people from switching is? I think it's not UX, but pure marketing.
I've got an HP40gs laying around from my physics days, I should really get some batteries for it. Picked up the cheapest scientific calculator I could for the geology degree, a Sharp EL-501w (The casio fx260 is near and dear to my heart but it doesn't have a second line/history which is very handy) and I still pick that up pretty frequently, my phone has rpncalc, which is great and all but it doesn't come to hand as easily.
The big difference is that standard theoretical techniques have indicated the compound to be promising from an electronic structure point of view and confirmed that it would be tricky to synthesize just right.

Cold fusion always was dependent on new physics to be discovered
Bayesian methods are not easy to use, I agree. But that's because they're trying to answer much more meaningful (but harder) questions than frequentist ones, which researchers should be trying to do. You can't ignore Bayesian epistemology just by not using Bayesian methods. The underlying considerations in the Bayesian framework will inevitably become relevant to how you interpret your data, whether or not you use a formal Bayesian method.

The thing is, formally, frequentist methods like Null Hypothesis Significance Testing don't tell you what you really want to know. If you get a significant p-value, that means the data you observed wouldn't often happen by chance (within your model of the null). This doesn't actually tell you if your particular hypothesis should be favored. That requires other considerations, including ones that Simonsohn is negative about in this article.

For example, Simonsohn's conclusion says:

> To use Bayes factors to test hypotheses: you need to be OK with the following two things:

> 1. Accepting the null when “the alternative” you consider, and reject, does not represent the theory of interest.

> 2. Rejecting a theory after observing an outcome that the theory predicts.

He implies that these should be points against Bayes factors. But #2 is something you actually should do sometimes. Demonstrably. If the data suggests a wildly implausible effect size that doesn't show up consistently in other analyses, that should be a point against your theory and in favor of some more mundane explanation, like noisy data from an underpowered study [1].

Not using Bayesian methods is understandable if you don't feel comfortable with the very heavy demands they can make on your statistics acumen. But if you're, say, a social scientist incentivized to get "sexy" results and you refuse to engage with Bayesian epistemology at all, your career will almost certainly just be a contribution of more noise publications to the replication crisis.

[1] http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/presentations/ziff.pdf
Most Chromium-forks are not interested at all (or do not have the resources, considering the tons of costs it has) into doing any core changes to fight against Google, only Vivaldi… all the others are either doing nothing or just PR bullshit.

If a feature is rolled out to 95% of users, then websites have to adapt. If you have a browser and are part of these remaining 5% you will be the one blamed by the users and by the websites. So there is no incentive to remove any hostile feature.
It's called title case, rather common for titles, headlines, names of films and so-on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_case
> They even ported their software to ARM

Which is close to trivial if you're mainly using macOS APIs.

Of course Adobe probably has a lot of platform-agnostic stuff but which wasn't that straightforward to port but I'm pretty sure the UI and system stuff is still mainly using Cocoa.

I'm not even sure the macOS version would be necessarily that easier to port than the Windows one (then again there is probably not that much .net code in their tools)
Linux kernel API itself isn't really enough to do eg. any UI software, because things like creating windows or showing notifications, are not part of it directly. You need additional software on top of that for those features.

Win32 API is much larger than Linux kernel API and is stable so there is quite large chance that a couple decades old software still works without recompiling or updating libraries. It has its issues with many parts of it being completely horrifying to use, but the stability is something that Microsoft has done well.
Either pay someone to maintain it for as long as you need or engineer around whatever issues you encounter; it's a you problem, and possibly the development process or software stack you are using is not flexible or robust enough to support your own usecase. Unless you specifically pay for how many years of support you need, then you don't get to decide the terms of whatever support is offered for free.
Ah, so we already killed hundred of thousands of innocent civilians, so of course it is ok for us to kill a some more? Not sure that this is a solid argument...
Very good. Your cover, like your head, extends for 2 seconds before dropping off.

We trawled SNOMED extensively for fun, er, I mean, data model research in my last company. But we didn't spot that one.
no, and for years. I use only my phone calculator, ipython and if I feel masochistic, excel
Thanks for the great questions! Find answers below, let me know if you have any further questions :-)

1. Our issuing partner is Brale.xyz, a US regulated stablecoin company by Ben Milne, the founder of Dwolla. Brale works with partners on their end to invest in US Treasuries. More info here: https://www.glodollar.org/articles/brale-and-the-glo-foundat...

On audits: we're working with a big 4 auditor on audit readiness. Our goal is to publish audits regularly and be fully transparent in both our operations and treasury holdings. Brale will publish monthly attestations of the assets backing Glo Dollar, and we will have audit rights over those assets on a periodical basis as well.

2. While US Treasuries indeed have a maturity date, treasuries with a maturity date of up to 3 months are considered a "cash equivalent" because their market is so liquid. Because of this, they can easily be exchanged for cash in the event a lot of people want their cash back at once.

3. Glo's per-dollar impact is low at first. As adoption grows, it ramps up. At scale, we expect to lift 1 person out of extreme poverty per $20,000 of Glo Dollar market cap by generating approximately $480 in interest that we can donate to GiveDirectly. We're not there yet, as we need to ramp up market cap beyond $2m first. More info here: https://www.glodollar.org/articles/from-bootstrap-to-high-im...

4. Stablecoins provide actual utility to crypto traders (hence why there are $125B of them in circulation). So our thinking is that we can drive adoption by meeting traders where they are. We also think that Glo Dollar’s philanthropic mission will give it an edge for IRL stablecoin adoption. More on that here: https://www.glodollar.org/articles/vision-and-growth-strateg...

Happy to answer any other questions!
Note, too, that this is the DoJ. They, unlike the FTC, actually know what they are doing.
There are a huge number of app based solutions. Enterprises are against them because they can't expect their employees to install 20 different apps for 20 different vendors + the cost of reviewing and onboarding them.

So you either need to support SMS or several of the major 2FA app providers including the crappier implementations like Microsoft authenticator.
It makes sense to me, he's trying to make something that can answer this question: https://youtu.be/dEv99vxKjVI?t=1909
I do think that sometimes configurability can be a crutch or a hasty solution that developers resort to instead of thinking through their defaults or adding a bit of intelligence to their program's behavior. Apple definitely aims to avoid that pitfall with their 'just works' approach, and I think that's valid.

But they take it too far for my tastes. And the lack of configurability makes those times when the UX is disagreeable or just plain wrong feel like an insult as well as a defect.

> "intuitive" is just fricking hype

I think I remember my dad once saying that there's only one intuitive user interface for mammals: the nipple. After that, you're learning, whether you admit it or not!
Embrace the Future of Tech with the Spatial Computing Revolution
Hey everyone! If you're into cutting-edge technology and software engineering, I've got an enlightening article for you to dive into!

Forbes just published an eye-opening piece on the Spatial Computing Revolution and its impact on the future of tech. Discover how this revolutionary technology is reshaping our digital world, blurring the lines between the physical and virtual realms, and opening up endless possibilities for developers and engineers alike.

Read the article and don't miss out on staying ahead of the curve in the tech world.

Let's discuss our thoughts after reading the article!

#SpatialComputing #TechRevolution #SoftwareEngineering
Everyone commenting here how author wants 15 years support for free hasn't read the article.

>Those of us creating medical devices, software for factory lines, and systems that matter need a minimum of 15 years for an LTS especially if you have it in your fool head we should pay money for it.

Emphasis mine.

Author is saying, rightfully, that "long term" support needs to be more than 5 years. Author is also saying, reasonably, that it should be at least 15 years if the developers in question want to be paid for support.

Author is saying he will pay for long term support if that's what it takes, but not if it's any shorter than 15 years.
Bullshit. Stop assuming the trillion dollar corporation is incompetent and blameless. They know exactly what they are doing. Remote attestation allows them to determine that a web page has been "tampered with". Tampering includes deleting ads and corporate spyware as well as user scripts, extensions and automation. It is obvious how Google and all other corporations stand to gain from such technology.
Considering the current amount of craziness in tech, there’s enough for at least 2 more seasons of Silicon Valley..
as long you can rent rack full of servers and use it easily there is not that kind monopoly.
I mean, you can do a lot of things (osx-fuse etc.) - but it really feels like it should be supported by the Operating System as a standard feature. The permission system just makes very little sense being as broad as it is.

The other thing is that on Linux that would probably work consistently once it's done whereas on macOS you'd always be waiting for it to break, or it would need to be set up again after every update etc.

Sadly, on macOS it always feels like you're fighting against Apple to use your machine how you want - a certain amount of the bad experience feels like dark patterns because you didn't pay Apple's through-the-roof storage prices in the first place. The same is true of how Mac's limit external displays in software but that's a whole other kettle of fish.
Ai.com is such a better domain than x.ai. Still probably a waste of money to just redirect it.
Python on Vercel is in beta and it's not their core competency: https://vercel.com/docs/concepts/functions/serverless-functi....

Vercel is synonymous with Next.js and JavaScript, not Python. Flask and Django also don't have full integration with React like Next.js (Because it's all JS) and Reflex (Feature of the framework) do.

The value prop is very clear to me. Next.js is extremely popular for good reason, I see a lot of value in bringing that to the Python ecosystem as well, especially with all the Python ML SDKs.
"We recommended you went for X and listed SMS security problems as the reasons - here is the email chain"

You need to cover your ass, but you don't want to actively push back and risk losing the sale.
Remember the "Safari is the new IE" narrative? Just because Safari doesn't support some API doesn't make it IE, IE wasn't an inferior browser at the beginning either. What made IE the IE everyone hates was its departure from standards(?) and enforcing its own vision of the web thanks to its enormous market share. On IE's case, MS probably stagnated it to prevent competition against its desktop Apps business and on Google's case it's going to be in the name of data collection and ad business.

Chrome is the new IE.

But yeah, that's what you get when you don't know history.
Cryptocurrencies on the other hand don’t seem to be doing all thar well. Their hype-phase is definitely over and not many actually useful use cases remained.
I applied last month and have never heard back (not even an automated email), so I'd say yes.
> while being related to a crypto

There is your answer
Come again? You mean the self-grandizing, almost sacked twice, never really promoted anti-semite Patton? And the lying about flight ime to get decorations, life desteoying, actually sacked and rediculed McCarthy?

But I'll bite, how exactly were those two individuals right about anything? Can ypu share some specific details?
> software just moves way faster than that

Which is the problem if you don't want to spend your days troubleshooting BS problems.

Much of the movement is for no good reason at all.
Why is the FCC giving other companies the right to block One Owl if they fail to comply, rather than simply terminating One Owl's connection to the network?
Yikes. Is Altman speed-running the don't-be-evil plotline?
This was already specific enough,

> Chromebooks are usually left as a curiosity among Saturn, Media Markt, Blue, Vobis, Public, .... that gets routinely rebated until someome finally takes them away.

Seldom see them in public in DACH and southern countries, on planes, trains, coffee shops, only rich family schools have laptops like on US,...
They're implying they wanted to pay for 15 years support but found no takers. Is the problem that nobody wanted to support them for 15 years (their insinuation) or that they didn't pay enough? Given they keep talking about 5-year LTSes without bringing up any of the 10-year LTSes that do exist (Freexian, RHEL, etc), it seems clear to me that it's the latter.

Also their requirement is nonsensical. They want support, ie bugfixes, which will require them to install updates. But at the same time they don't want a model that will update them to the latest supported version. Why do they care what the content of the update is? The point of the support contract is that they will be supported regardless.

Also also, speaking as someone who works at a company supplying software to car manufacturers, we don't have 15-year LTS for our software either and the manufacturers don't have a problem with it. Their stacks are being designed around automatic updates, which again they had to be anyway to get bugfixes in general. Support contracts are support contracts. Whether an update changes v1.0.0 to v1.1.0 or v2.0.0 makes no difference to them. So what the author says about car manufacturers is also nonsense.
inevitable.
When the media reporting the news is factually owned and operated by the manufacturers of bombs, who are also well in bed with government and military agencies, then yes - pretty much every news story is misdirection away from the things that will effect that bomb-makers'/news-makers'/politician-pocketers' bottom line .. the time for paying attention to this was when the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was passed, allowing massive wholesale capture of America's propaganda industry by its military complex.

See also: the Smith-Mundt Act.
I use Office XP just fine to open documents sent to me that were made in Microsoft 365 or whatever Office is called these days.

Yes, I greatly respect Microsoft's attitude towards compatibility.
wonder how many applications they get through the application form.
Lost me a bit when they extolled high fidelity to the original then changed it :-/
I can run 30 year old programs on my x86_64 machine just fine. What the heck is the author talking about. X86 is one of the beacons of long term support. I upgrade computers every 10 years or so. And never had issues. Ever.
I think the importance of the quote is not in the answer, it's about how to frame the problem.