skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The flower didn't test positive for metals, just the edibles. I think my friend said the edibles tested positive for aluminum and fluorocarbons? Dont recall specifically.

My feeling is the body has an easier time breaking down smoke VS. the metals snd flurocarbons which could stay in your system a while and stack. The lesser of two evils?? lol If the edibles are "clean" then they take less of a toll than smoking but if they are not (metals, shitty ingredients) then smoking the flower might be better. I'm not too familiar how much of a toll trace metals and flurocarbons affect the body and how hard/easy it is for the body to get rid and eliminate, for example, aluminum. Seems like smoke might be less of a foreign element to the body and it knows how to break down easier. Either way, drugs are bad but fun =D
Yeah, the law is one thing but actually pursuing recourse is a pain itself.
I've read that for many years, it was considered a truism in Hollywood that any movie needed a romance element in order to keep the females in the audience interested. Hence, many war and science fiction movies had a lone woman with romance on the mind shoehorned into an otherwise all-male story.
I believe that's how the author earns a living: the software is free (and has online help), but the manual costs money.
Bottom bar forces you to drag your cursor in a part of the screen you rarely goes. Also saving vertical space makes sense in an era of wide screens.
Holy hell. Is this it?
> divorce stats by number of previous sexual partners. There is a clear rise in divorce rate per increase in partners, and at about 7 it's 50%+

I guarantee that it's women who initiate the divorce here, and that's what matters.
Well, most of HN still has the mentality that China can only copy/steal as perpetuated by the media.

It was true 20 years ago when China had to catch up in everything.

The thinking needs to be updated.

Heck, just look at chemistry publications from top US and European universities. Chances are, there's one or more Chinese names in most of them.
> better than a free search engine that can optimize queries and search experience better.

....friend, did you use Google 20 years ago?

It might be better at figuring out what actress your grandma is looking for...but struggles more with technical, scientific, or any sort of intelligent queries.
i have a 7hz dioko and i absolutely love it. i would give it a try, since it's not that expensive.
Not everyone wants children though. Happily living with a lifetime partner is not age limited.

Though if people do want children, they should absolutely know the risks.
Looking at that list, I feel like we would first have to establish which things actually do make life better and which only make it more comfortable. This is going to be highly subjective.

For some reason, I'm not entirely willing to believe that my parents (who are still alive) had a less happy life than I have even though they didn't grow up with an iPhone. And it's not like modern conveniences have no downsides (e.g. increase in stress). That's not to say I would give up on these things readily, I'm just way too used to them.

I think probably most people could agree that treatments for diseases that regularly also affect young / middle-aged peolle are a good thing. It's hard to argue that someone in the prime of their life should die of some silly infection.
10* years ago, apologies for the typo.
Another one for me is a sound bite of kids laughing which I first noticed in Diddy Kong Racing's boot screen[1] and now I hear everywhere

[1] https://youtu.be/_TtOPPKEqRI?t=10
Sure but after that they went to the internet to watch what the Wild West back then provided
Global warming is already solved, but no one wants to do it because fossil fuel profits are easier and higher than the alternatives.
that account is fan fiction
This will run on a PC with 16GB of ram (possible less) It's a 7b model quantized.

docker run -it --rm ghcr.io/purton-tech/mpt-7b-chat
> the CIA's "conspiracy theorist" agitprop

What's your actual claim here? "Everything anyone comes up with about the CIA is either true or invented by the CIA to make people think people like me are insane"? Do you think there's any room for honest weirdos to make idiotic claims about a famous entity? Because there's a well-characterized disease which induces people to do pretty much exactly that, and it's existed since long before the CIA, the OSS, or America were even conceived of.
Hasn’t this already been done by several groups? It’s the first paper but it’s old news now.
Chromium is not 100% Google's forever and always, though they do currently lead the way, and with the most used/backed fork.

https://github.com/brave/brave-core/pull/19476
I don't see why people go crazy over this, the meissner effect in superconductors look different.
So far I've found them good (Small Gods & Witches), but Bill Nighy, who does the footnotes in the most bland ADR tone after an annoying charm effect, is by far the worst part. If you can get past or enjoy those the rest is great.
A 100Ghz CPU would be limited by other factors; mostly c.
> little kids want explosions and references instead of human connection

Another hint from extremely fandom-orientated movies like this: just as kpop bands aren't allowed to have boyfriends/girlfriends, maybe the relationships are taken away from the characters to allow the fans to develop the more intense parasocial relationship with the character/actor without any onscreen partner "getting in the way"?
> you don't deserve to use computers...

If that's not sarcasm then you just proved GP's point.
The point is that memories fade in with newer perceptions.

Beauty is subjective, but most would agree romantic relationships form on the basis of one seeing some beauty in the other, not ugliness, or not too much ugliness at least. What is felt past that is not the current perceptions, its those along with a history of feelings.

There is some survival basis here but since this is not true: looking at the partner I met at 40 I see the beauty that s/he was or could have 20 year earlier. It stands right to reach such conclusion: a 19y old is not a 40y old and impacts the chance of a lasting relationship. all other parameters being equal the 19y case is superior to lasting if beauty does matter.

Another interesting bit: we are likely to have a more positive perception of the ugly we know or believe used to be a beauty. We are gene selecting species like all others in the end
> Not everything that makes you uncomfortable or embarrassed about your state is a conspiracy theory.

This is a great thought-stopping cliche to prevent people from realizing they've bought into some dumb ideas.

"I can't be wrong, all of the people saying so are just ignorant hyper-patriots!"
Wow, that's good to know, because that's something I feel a lot when going from my Intel MBP to my AMD Windows laptop, especially important for accessibility (VoiceOver).
Most of the hatred piled on China by members of Western nations currently engaged in imperialist endeavours, invasions, destruction of sovereign states, and occupying the wealthy regions of its enemies states', is really just projection.

Americans' don't want anyone else in the world to do to them, what their nation has been doing for 40 years: dropping bombs on mostly innocent people every twenty minutes.

China has managed to lift a billion people out of poverty into a new era of prosperity. It has created a wealthy middle class for millions and millions of people to improve their lives. Keep that in mind when the anti-China agitprop gets triggered by American exceptionalists.

The USA is not capable of doing that for its own people.
> This does a POST each time, albeit automatically on typing. It still means a lag for a kind of validation that could have been done client side.

If you can accept that lag, the tradeoff is that you only have to write the validation logic once, in one language. Furthermore, if your validation includes something like "check that this username isn't already registered" that requires server-side logic, you're stuck with that POST request and lag anyway.
These things are all limited to single objects and can't process say, to be complex, a tea party in a rose garden, right?
> polar bear numbers are increasing

Hope they'll flourish when we'll have ice free arctic summer in/before 2030.
I guess the biggest problem/downside/flaw with this is that you wait for a response from the backend to update the UI. Which is mostly fine, but I've come to expect either a round trip to the server, or instantaneous updates.

This is the uncanny valley for me, it's neither the old school web or "SPA land" (for a lack of a better term). In the todo example, I write some garbage and press "Add", there is absolutely 0 feedback anything happened. I then press it again. About 100ms later, the first thing I typed appeared, then slightly later it got replaced with nothing.

I have no idea how I'd fix that in this framework, there's too much magic for me to figure out where I'd insert a "fix" for this. I'd probably start writing my own javascript to disable the button while it's submitting (which isn't great, but better than today), at which point the "magic" is lost.
Years of doing nothing has somehow led to nothing being done...
That's quite a difficult chart to read and I think you need a bit more context in your quote. The "starter marriage" is for women between 15 and 20.

The image appears to show the best age for women to marry to be early to late twenties and both article and image say late marriages are more likely to end in divorce.

So I think the general point of the comment you are replying to stands and is supported by the article.
TIL... despite nearly two decades here! I knew it was illegal for businesses to use contact information you gave them for some other reason to later market to you without your permission (especially after GDPR went into effect), but not that it was also illegal for them to simply sit down with the phone book or an autodialer.
In what universe do you live that Google or anyone else should device this complicated scheme to just capture 2-3 people. Linux has only 3% share of the users. of those maybe 0.1% could write a kernel module (or even install one) and of those maybe 1% would be maniac enough to dedicate time and effort to it just to "stick it to the Pawaaa"

Google could accomplish all of their supposedly nefarirous goals by just ignoring the linux users. Do you really think they are going through all this trouble to make sure that they deliver adds to those 2-3 people? I can already see the next earnings call, "adds impression targets increased by 2".

Notice again the Netflix example. They just don't have a linux App and you cant legally view Netflix movies offline in Linux. it's cheaper to ignore linux users. like it or not, that is a fact.

outside of Linux, if chrome were to provide an API, for hardware information it can be completely trusted and even in linux case I would say that it still can be trusted with 99.99% confidence.
We can be displeased by both. The reason there's negativity here is because it was mentioned. I wouldn't realistically expect to see people say "oh yeah this doesn't really bother me because adtech exists."
Threads like these are always eye-opening about the kind of person that frequents this place.
Yes: http://www.ulisp.com/show?3KN3
I read the article and found it trite. The author doesn't seem to be a deep or "dangerous" thinker, as claimed in the by-line.

The US film industry produces circuses on a screen. It has rarely produced sociologically-honest works that merit attention.

It's all Barnum and Bernays.
> but in my experience this the subsystem is usually not where you'll find the error; more often it's in your own code

More often perhaps, but compilers and their standard libraries are complex pieces of software written by human beings - and it's not that uncommon to encounter them, especially if you go a bit off the beaten path or are an early adopter.
I'm sure this isn't in the spirit or meaning of what you said, but to respond jokingly, I haven't found many censored anythings :-P turns out...
We really need an Uncorn(y) name ...
Mainland China airs documentary signalling military preparation to attack Taiwan
Python Software Foundation forks httpbin
To quote the Family Guy theme-song:

"It seems today that all you see,
Is violence in movies and sex on TV"

So this pattern was being noted at least as far back as 1999.
It's in the original headline, but I had to cut it because it was too long.
The rock should float for a start.
> Judges becoming polical hacks is the last nail in the coffin of the free world.

Lazy, myopic political comments are the last nail in the coffin of HN.
he didn't say he is single or planning to stay single forever. He might as well dating someone younger. For woman its generally:

- harder to date someone younger

- it's harder to date when you are 35+ (smaller pool of single people) but even harder for woman (because guys take bigger importance into how someone look and because of woman biological clock)

- when someone is divorced with kid (even when young) is hard to date for anyone but for woman even more difficult
Probably with social media the funnel is wider than ever. Being good looking and fit and putting in lots of effort to that pays decently for thousands of people. So probably all side actors are social mediaing and doing sponsored content on the side. Or more likely the acting / being on reality tv is the side gig
Looks like most everyone got a lot of inconvenience due to the inefficiencies due to a bunch of stupid phone calls, with a lot of money being made by a few jerks, largely at the expense of senior citizens who weren't prepared to deal with a rapid shift in the way the world worked.
Personally, I have no difficulty navigating to different parts of my screen, and I don't consider it saving space if it removes something I actually want to be prominent.

However, I can see your point, and the design probably be more approachable if I had a higher-end computer with a good screen.
Why does her behavior before your relationship speak of her character, but her behavior during and after not speak of her character?

I presume the reason you want to date someone with fewer partners is because you are trying to weed out partners who are unlikely to stick around. So if she doesn't stick around anyway because she wants to play the field, that means your judgement was wrong.

If you don't actually care about breakups (which is the impression your comments are giving me), I'm not sure why any of it matters. Why avoid dating someone with a long history of break-ups if you don't actually care when or why your relationships end?

For what it's worth, when I was looking for a partner, I discounted men who had more than a couple short-term relationships like that. Even if they were completely serious about all of those relationships and it was their partners who left them for a more promiscuous lifestyle, a pattern of such relationships speaks poorly of their ability to identify compatibility in a partner. I was picky about men I would date, and so I was only interested in men who were similarly picky about women they would date.
The patent is worthless if the FDA doesn't approve its use.
I don't understand what you're not seeing. Nobody is saying that the whole LK-99 sample is superconducting. Why would you expect the whole sample to float, instead of "partial floating" as we're seeing, if you have a material that's only partially superconducting?
Not so much as a passing mention of the official Discworld Stamps, designed by Bernard Pearson and officially endorsed by Sir Pterry himself. :-(

http://www.discworldstampcatalogue.co.uk/shshome.php
Meissner Effect does not mean it has to float. It only floats if thats the easiest way to expulse the magnet field. Otherwise it aligns normally with the magnetic field, which is supposedly happening here.
Fine, as long as some of the profits from my rent go towards development of the Linux gaming ecosystem. It may not be the best way through, but it's the most hopeful path forward at the moment.
As it’s been theorized elsewhere, it may be that the production processes produce a material with only bits of the theorized superconductor in it, leading to the wiggling effect we see here as well as the Chinese replication video.
I think there are multiple big reasons they didn't publish sooner. It is pretty clear that they were convinced, but had insufficient evidence to convince others. Additionally there had recently been a sensational fraud in their field so journals would have been extremely sceptical.

It seems to me they were just in the process of constructing a convincing paper, which included convincing tests and could have been acompanied by sending out samples to independent labs.
Then they were essentially forced to put out what they had, which made their claims even more unconvincing.
Shhhh, he’s trying to spread FUD while blaming FUD, why are you poking holes in his argument?
The macOS Threats Trending in the Dark Web
Is Matcha actually a good coffee replacement?
Not health-wise, because it's most likely winning there. But does it taste as good as coffee?!
I really agree with what you said here, and I think this is an important message – so thank you for putting it so well.

This is something I had no appreciation for when I was younger. I thought romantic love was just that – you find someone you like looking at and like being around, and if that changes then you move on.

But now I've been with my partner for more than a decade I've realised how shallow this view was. Realistically the connection I have with her I'll likely never be able to replace. When things get tough she understands me almost as well as I understand myself and I know she isn't just going to walk out of a 10+ relationship because I'm going through a few rough months. And obviously I feel the same about her... I want to be there for her for more than just thinking she looks nice and is fun to hang out with. The love we have is so much deeper at this point I don't know where I'd be without her, and I think she feels the same about me.

The only thing I'd disagree with you about is how relevant the number of partners is. Both me and my partner had quite a few relationships before we found each other, and I actually think that helped us since we knew we worked well. The difference is that the relationships we had before each other we really just 6-12 months things and when we met we were still quite young.

I think where you are correct is if you've been dating around for years and have some baggage (failed marriage, kids, etc) then when you try to settle down with someone else I'd imagine it would be difficult to develop the same depth of commitment to that person. One, because it just takes time, but two because it's now more complicated sine you have kids with another partner and therefore have other commitments outside your relationship that need to be managed and perhaps even prioritised.

I do believe the way we sell love and relationships today is wrong. I think the sexual aspect is obviously important, but it shouldn't be as much the focus. The thing that provides the most value long-term really is the depth of the emotional connection two people can develop over very long periods of time together. I'm not saying people should stick with their partners no matter what, but I think valuing commitment even when things are not perfect is something we don't do enough of anymore. If anything young people (including myself some years ago) seem to actually have a negative view of long-term commitment. I think that's sad and I feel very grateful I somehow stumbled on the path I'm on today.
> ...there was a brief period where actresses pretended that their thinness was natural...no one looks like that without calorie restriction.

I've known three women who were naturally thin because of their metabolism. They actually had to work at maintaining bulk. I think all three spent some time as models. You can improve a homely face with makeup, but you can't fake a figure (in person).
Turning No-Code Education into a strategic partnership and lucrative acquisition
For context, Postman took ownership of the project nearly 5 years ago. They removed existing maintainers, ignored issues and PRs, and made 0 commits since then.
> 430 lb 6'4 man. I'm 320 lb now

To people having trouble visualising this: that's 195kg or thirty stone, to 145kg or 23st. That's .. really quite a lot.

> I shouldn't feel the need to change anything about myself

The problem is there's no real relation between how heavy someone is and how much pressure they apply to themselves. If you feel better at 300lb than 400lb, won't you feel better at 200lb? How about 150lb? 100lb? There's a lot of really quite light people who engage in disordered eating because they feel the drive to be lighter and lighter to be more attractive.
Modern science seems to have gotten a lot of pretty interesting information from studying mummies. Here's one example from a very quick Google search [1].

Who's to say that future scientists won't find studying these modern-day mummies just as fascinating?

[1] https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/knhcentre/research/current/ma...
> For women marrying since the start of the new millennium:

> Women with 10 or more partners were the most likely to divorce, but this only became true in recent years;

> Women with 3-9 partners were less likely to divorce than women with 2 partners; and,

> Women with 0-1 partners were the least likely to divorce.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-li...

> In our sample, only 23 percent of the individuals who got married over the course of the study had had sex solely with the person they married. That minority of men and women reported higher marital quality than those who had had sex with other partners prior to marriage. We further found that the more sexual partners a woman had had before marriage, the less happy she reported her marriage to be. This association was not statistically significant for men.

https://before-i-do.org/

> We investigated sex differences in shoulder to hip ratios (SHR) and waist to hip ratios (WHR), and their relationships to different features of sexual behavior. Males with high SHR and females with low WHR reported sexual intercourse at an earlier age, more sexual partners, more extra-pair copulations (EPC), and having engaged in more instances of intercourse with people who were involved in another relationship (i.e., having themselves been EPC partners). The predictive value of these morphological features was highly sex-specific.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00149-6

> Past sexual promiscuity and sexual fantasies (Predictions 10 and 11). In both contexts, a partner’s concealed past sexual promiscuity (promiscuity) was rated as one of the more upsetting forms of deception (about 1 SD above the overall mean). Ratings did not differ by sex (ps > .05), failing to support Prediction 10. Prediction 11 was supported in the long term, with men’s ratings of a partner’s concealed sexual fantasies about others (sexual fantasy) relatively higher than women’s. There was no significant sex difference in the short term (p > .05). These results mirror those observed for sexual infidelity and flirtation and further suggest that the risk of cuckoldry constitutes a potent form of strategic interference for men in the long-term mating context.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271303
Don't most games of the era basically only poll inputs once per frame anyway? The Mega Drive six button controller basically relies on that behaviour, and the list of games that need to be forced into 3 button mode is quite short.
for complete tourists like myself, does this represent conclusive evidence of superconductivity in this sample or does it require more?
Party trick? To me this looks like a game changer for developing 3D art for videogames.

It's not there yet for AAA games, but will get there in time. In the meantime, right now as it is, it's could save days of time for the indie game dev.