skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The reasonable way to notice is to have alerts for any unexpected restarts. Relying on noticing intermittent service disruption is bound to fail. And so is "remembering to check for this":

> in the future I'm going to want to remember to check for this

Whenever you think that sentence, you should notice this as a red flag and re-think your approach. You will forget. And if not you, then somebody else in your team. You need automation for things you can forget, otherwise your mental checklists will grow too large to handle and are just a distraction.
That's ssh?
They are only preprints anyway, it's not like they matter ?

No peer review, and it's not like the preprints are going to matter much compared to the lab evidence for claims of discovery ?
I strongly disagree with this view. We don’t even know if such material can exist, and the intersected odds of it 1) existing 2) naturally and 3) us stumbling into it in the short term are astronomically low.

Not saying space exploration is not important, but the reason you cite for it is about at the bottom of the list.
Since I know nothing when it comes to superconductors and material science, can anyone summarize the differences between the original paper and this one? (No ChatGPT responses please.)
I always set `RestartSec`.
There's a Twitter post [0] that links to a version of this video [1] with English subtitles. Probably a better link since most HN users are English speakers.

[0] https://twitter.com/altryne/status/1686277321869975552

[1] https://targum.video/v/2023/8/1/e2ad3b8e86961ccfdcf411d2d4d1...
Is this abysmal quality of figures and charts normal? I'd imagine the devices used for measuring allow exports of CSVs and thereby enable external generation of proper figures instead of these pixely-screenshot-type pictures...
How much causes overdose?
Cloud CISO Perspectives: Late July 2023
I really don't know, but the next few years will sure be interesting for content moderation and anti-spam methods.

That is provided, of course that, people actually care about bots, large companies might well not, as bots drive up user counts. With increasingly more human like bots, it will be increasingly difficult to determine just how bad it is. An internet full of bots might be a conspiracy theory now (Dead internet theory), but is quickly becoming plausible.
Best thing to try first is to append /ip I've found.

For wgetip.com that is not needed of course. But I haven't found a way to get the IPv4 address there...
They're trolling, they're trying to create a logical knot by pitting different values they perceive people to hold against each other to try and create contradiction and confusion. But it's easily untied by recognizing they don't have any interesting point to make and we can just ignore them.
Or two bots, generating the same content.
Whose fault is that - the designer, or the woman?

I'm not talking about tort law, or damages. I'm talking about morals, which are subjective.

If you build a structure that is designed to be climbed on and experienced (your words) and someone climbs on and experiences a part of it and is maimed for life - isn't that a little bit your fault?

> And she's not the only one. Multiple people have demonstrated lack of good sense, and injured themselves, at the City Museum.

If your open-to-the-public interactive structure causes maimings when the public encounters it (given that we know many of them lack good sense), those maimings are a little bit your personal responsibility and fault.
programming a computer can be as
mind-strengthening as writing

When computers become more intelligent than humans, a strong mind (able to think stuff through) might not be of importance anymore. Just like being able to run fast is not important anymore in the times of cars and boats and planes.
You trust some random housing broker more than your own eyes?
V7 is an AI data platform to automate any visual task, voted by Forbes as one of the top 25 machine learning startups of 2021. We have raised over $40 million in venture funding and are backed by some of the most competent individuals in AI. We manage the training data and models of hundreds of AI companies and enterprises. What sets us apart is our team's obsession with pushing our product to where AI will be three years from today.

This month we’re hiring for:

-Senior Platform Engineer

-Security Engineer

-Backend (Medical) Engineer

-Senior Product Manager (API)

- Technical Project Manager

-Senior Web Designer

- Engineering Manager

All roles and applications here!: https://www.v7labs.com/working-at-v7
There are plenty of similar examples out there. Take, for instance, Kubernetes indefinitely failing to start a pod and just retrying while taking no action to notify whoever started the process (just hanging).

So, I can see two different aspects to this problem:

* Lack of alerts.

* Lack of RCA automation.

For the first one -- it would've been nice if systemd had a "brother" program that could be used for alerts, so that no custom solution was necessary and that services could properly report intermittent problems etc.

The second is contingent on several factors: re-envisioning error handling, declarative debugging and general popularization of the concept. There are several major problems with error handling in system programming languages today. Due to poor language runtime design, programmers learn to think about any and every error as essentially fatal. Recovery is typically seen as impossible, and if there's any sort of recovery code put in place, it's usually the one that tries to do the cleanup and start fresh. It's never really about fixing the problem. So, popularizing something like Common Lisp restart system with the ability to traverse the program stack back to the failing frame would've been a good first step in this direction.

Declarative debugging, on the other hand, could be taking another step forward, where it could be made into a separate program which describes a complex recovery scheme. I.e. the idea of declarative debugging is that the programmer needs to describe the program in terms of constraints that should be checked when the program fails to identify the problematic place. The step forward would be to add automation for the cases when the failed constraint is discovered.
Now I'm curious: how would you want a DVCS to handle large binaries?
Again, you miss my point.

"hundreds of reactor in operation for decades" is NOTHING. These plants have a large number of differences, and are located and operated often very differently. At the end, you have something like "10 plants operated for ~10 years under conditions A", "10 plants operated for ~15 years under conditions B", ...

SIX! Six reactors were the site of a military battle and ended up sustaining damage beyond anything foreseeable by the designers. Six is NOTHING. You cannot say "I trust that nuclear is intrinsically well-design to resist to military conflict" based on SIX cases. The damage may have been lucky. Or even may have been unlucky (I'm not saying that nuclear is unsafe, I'm just saying the stats says you cannot conclude).

The only people who pretend we have incredible knowledge about how to run nuclear plants safely are either people who also demonstrate they don't have any idea of what they need to check to "demonstrate safety", or they are experts that are on the left side of the Gaussian curve: they are as numerous as as-much-qualified experts who pretend nuclear plants are proven very unsafe (in other word: they are cherry-picked experts, and do not represent the consensus which is: nuclear plants are too complex, too diversified, too sensitive to surrounding circumstances and not yet used enough so that we can scientifically conclude)
The problem is not that Truth is impossible to find, rather that undeceiving the self is difficult.

The Truth is a perturbation of Objective Reality (the state resolve of universal potential into manifest form in the moment of now); and the truth is a figment of mind. Integrity is the measure of consistency between.

More mental models should factor in the unreliability of conceptual state in reference to external resolve.
Based on your descriptions, if LK99 is real, it sounds like there are closer to infinite than 0 of these materials. If there are so many combinations and somebody randomly stumbled on one, it makes sense that if the number of combinations is asymptotically infinite, that number of superconducting materials is very large.
> The problem here are the normal (usually copper) wires between transistors that cause heat to build up whenever current flows through them.

IIRC with the high frequencies of modern processors switching losses tend to be a larger factor than resistive losses. If you can remove the resistive losses that leaves you with a greater heat budget from switching losses which might help drive up frequency even more.
The evidence is all the weird bits about how the paper was published, and other internet comments about the third author's relationship to the group.

The authorship of the papers is relevant to the science here, since both papers have quality issues, so I wrote out the accusation as best I understood it. The evidence is nowhere near enough to prove anything and largely rumor right now, but I do think it's suggestive.
What's the différance? [I'll leave now]
What happens if you accidentally save a file with some sort of secret that gets sucked in?
"Temple OS Theme / Rice For Arch Linux" is the description of the repo on the page. I understand the sentiment, but I don't think the title's the right place to correct the original author.
It is. The OP is wrong, probably because he has never used Mercurial, which wouldn’t be that surprising given it doesn’t have a lot of users outside of the few remaining companies still using it.
The journalists who spotlighted one of Malaysian childrens' biggest problems
I think replacing “seem like” with “appear to be” would make the sentence worse. “Seem like” gives a more abstract feel to the comparison, which is well-suited to the sentence given that “the pen” does not refer to an individual pen and “a crutch” does not refer to literal crutches. “Appear to be” is also just more wordy.

But “has”, “needs”, and “will” should probably be “had”, “needed”, and “would”, and then I would replace “were to live” with “lived”.
It's a login prompt and you can close it to keep watching. But as linked in another comment, this link may be easier for non-Chinese viewers: https://targum.video/v/2023/8/1/e2ad3b8e86961ccfdcf411d2d4d1...
I definitely did not work at an ISP. But what I said doesn't require a static IP per house. Just GeoIP so non-UK residents are treated differently (unless they VPN).
Another way of putting this is that Americans' over-litigious society ruins things in America (except, of course, bicycling, which we somehow universally concluded can and should remain deadly to all).

Not everything needs 47 railings. Somehow the other 96% of human beings manages without sippy cups.
I honestly do not know.

Perhaps they think using GPUs for computation is a passing fad? They hate money? Their product is actually terrible and they dont want to get found out (that one might be true for intel)?
Moral of the storey. Write your own OS and code if you want privacy.
Then they can make sure people in the UK have a subscription account.
How? What mods do you use? I played pretty much without mods, so if you could also mention your whole mods' stack would be cool.

In vanilla, all antennas are omnidirectional and as long as there is a working solar panel on a probe, it can be used as a relay sat.
There, /ip is better.
Congratulations on the release. I've been following this project for a while and it's great to see this. I agree with many others here about an obsidian plugin but no rush. The work you've done here is amazing.
This is a very useful and cool commenting platform but is a bit pricey, a plan from 2,3$/months for something like 10,000 pages/months would fits better for more people who don't have 100,000 pages/months view.
Very good article ! Nice insight as to who/what/where and how much :)
Google Assistant reportedly pivoting to generative AI
>assume you build a tower 120 meters

I think the more popular approach is to use a deep hole, like a mine shaft. Maybe depth measured in kms. Because you're suspending from above you might be able to get a bit heavier than 60 tons.
Nah that’s not lack of premature optimization, that’s just electron apps and everyone learning JavaScript.
The code isn't what I find unbelievable, it's the embellishments and the characters in the story.
Nintendo Switch successor reportedly due late 2024
Yes, called iPlayer[0].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC_iPlayer
Yet some cyclists have no issue going with high speed through children on those streets.
I agree it doesn't really matter; all that matters is it could have happened.

But the reason people pretend is they are against "strict regulations". Given the cost of dealing with Covid and the negligible benefits, they should be so strict the research is basically banned.
This is a good summary: https://youtu.be/RjzL9cS3VW8?t=32

TLDW it seems very unlikely that they have what they claim
"Inside Twitter rival Bluesky’s first major crisis, as investors pressured CEO Jay Graber to speak out about racist incident"

The fact this is a thing at all speaks of the fact we still have no clue what we're doing with social networks.

Let me change something in the headline, see if it still makes sense:

"Inside World Wide Web's first major crisis, as CERN investors pressured inventor Tim Berners-Lee to speak out about racist incident."

It doesn't make sense because the Internet, the Web, DNS, HTTP, HTML, those are technological components which have no moderation component, they're just technology on TOP of which you can apply moderation and regulation where you need it.

Social networks are exactly like IP, but instead of devices getting an IP address, people do. So an identifier is tied to a person, then this person can publish messages. Those messages can be wired around to other people based on preferences and subscription. That's it.

As long as we keep fusing together issues of moderation with issues of networking, this will happen. They're like two layers that want to freely adapt to one another, not be part of one monolith.

Note I AM NOT SAYING that we need no moderation. We absolutely do need moderation. I'm just saying "moderation" as an issue should be decoupled from the network layer.
... so a Jujutsu Kaisen begins if getting a commit conflict?
Like your fun, but for some extra seriousness, 10k$ is the order of magnitude you pay to setup FTTH in a big city. Most times, consumer ISPs eat the cost and make economies of scale by connecting entire neighborhoods, but if you don't have that chance and for some reasons ISPs won't connect you you can count on 10-50k$ infrastructure bill.

Also, consumer ISPs like Comcast are the worst. If you have good relationships in your neighborhood/municipality, going collective like with SCANI/Freifunk is always going to be more interesting and useful.
In this case there was no ditch, merely a poorly maintained and hardly lion-resistant fence but interesting point!
Another DNS based one:

dig ip @dns.toys +short
> computer that runs 1000GW of power through it without heating up

It doesn't work like that. Non-reversible computations necessarily produce heat. The superconducting wires will not heat, but the CPU will.
You're entirely correct; I was oversimplifying the (fairly horrifying) situation.
> ~50% of the world population are women

yet 95% of the prison inmates are male. There are obvious differences on the extreme ends of the spectrum between males and females and the nobel price only considers extremes to begin with.
Sounds like a good challenge for (Open)AI
Tell the company (not the branch) as much.
Related DVCS: https://pijul.org/

I need to try it out at $WORK since constant rebasing on a busy repo with a hundred or so committers is not fun.
Reddit updates its site design for logged-out users
Switch losses are also resistance losses, they just get amplified by things like the skin effect.
What's up with "Error! Bookmark not defined"? Is this some kind of trolling? I guess its presence in the first version is understandable if it was posted in hurry, but why leave it in the revised version?
Assuming competence on the behalf of the park could have been his last mistake I guess.

When I see something that looks strange, I assume it is going to fall apart any second and that an idiot built it. That have saved me a lot of trouble in construction work.

The scary fence is a fence that looks safe but isn't. Like if the lions leans against it, it falls through, or something.
I liked local "Italian restaurant ad" Ponzi. I mean it still looked like scam to me, but I can understand why people fell for it. Scheme can only last for few months, a year at most, so the organizer must be ready to GTFO as soon as it reaches the peak. Participants are offered $1k/months for placing the restaurant ad on their car (banner behind rear windshield) but asked for $3k or $4k "security deposit". Of course the "restaurant ad" actually only said "I make $1k/month with this ad, call xxx to learn how".
Good points. Embedded systems deal with many of those. It made me think of a funny story that causes me to pay closer attention to things like this:

Some time ago I shipped a product running an RTOS which unfortunately had a subtle scheduler bug where it would randomly crash periodically. The bug was pretty rare (I thought), only affecting part of the system, and reproducing the bug took several days each time.

In my infinite genius, rather than waste weeks of valuable time up to release, I set up the watchdog timer on the processor to write a crash dump and silently reboot. A user would maybe see a few seconds of delayed input and everything would come back up shortly.

Unfortunately, I had accidentally set the watchdog clock divider the wrong way, resulting in the watchdog not activating for over 17 hours after a hang!

The bug became much more widely noticeable after the product was released, and only by sheer luck, many people never noticed it.

I eventually fixed the scheduler bug in an update, but the useless watchdog configuration was set in stone and not fixable. Taught me to never assume a rare bug would stay rare when many tens of thousands of people use something in the field.
> 46k year old worm from Siberian permafrost brought back to life, gave birth

... and its milk is pretty good too. /s

Schools were supposed to educate people.
On that argument, you're advocating robbing the origin countries of the benefit of the children they invested in.
Re PS: What’s gonna convince you?
As far as I can tell lifthrasiir is correct here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36953052
Rushing out the second paper was a mistake and not a good look for the group. It would have been enough to force the retraction of Kwon's paper, and even without a retraction it's very unlikely it would have counted for anything with such weak data.
So instead of having one long document with chapters about facts in front, you'd have two shorter documents, one about facts and one about the rest, and the org chart of the people writing it would be somewhat different.
Or perhaps even stronger - theories _should_ produce predictions.
It’s a ceramic so hard to make wires from
"working copy is automatically committed" seems like a good idea at first glance, but there are many situations where this is not a good idea:

- when new artefact files are added and you have not yet added them to .gitignore, they'll be automatically committed

- when you have added ignored files in one branch and switch to another branch, the files will still be in your working copy but not listed in your .gitignore file, and would then be automatically committed

- staging only some files and comitting is much easier than splitting a commit after the fact
I wish I had this resource when I was first learning algebraic number theory; I strongly recommend it to any student of algebra, number theory or cryptography, as well as people interested in special functions inside and outside of pure mathematics.

Apart from the specialist interest, I think the webpage design has a nice combination of form and functionality.
https://www.wri.org/insights/global-trends-forest-fires
Building all public spaces for the least common denominator turns all of society into Harrison Bergeron.
I'm not sure what you are saying, you think that post was talking of "beliefs" in the sense "opinions about pure fiction"? I'll also state here that for me "beliefs" about anything except fiction will by definition have the last turtle rest on the firmament of empirical reality.

Anyway, that seems a distinct debate from the one you opened with, that you were trained according to:
> Students were paired off and given a biblical passage to examine, say, Jonah and the whale. One student would have to defend Jonah while the other defended, basically, God. After ten minutes, the teacher would say "switch" and they would have to defend the opposite side with equal logic and vigor. This was the making of a mind.
As philosophy professors often do.
A fine question.

I feel this quote

> “The app right now is really just the first building block in a much larger vision for how we want the social web to work,” Graber said.

Highlights a difference in ontological approach.
Thanks for that.
I feel this video isn't particularly good after watching it. Surely that could be any ferrous material thats interacting with the field/inductive eddies there.
How Much Americans Spend on Lottery Tickets
The betting market is of the opposite opinion. It went from 27% chance of replication (by 2025) to 47% since yesterday.

https://manifold.markets/QuantumObserver/will-the-lk99-room-...
You are correct my wife is more of a 'somethibg could happen randomly' VA my science approach. Both approaches have their advantages.
Sorry for the unrelated question, but can someone tell me how this blog is built? What tech stack is used here?
A relevant alternative is the systemd_exporter, which will export metrics for various systemd services, including restart count: https://github.com/prometheus-community/systemd_exporter#met...
I think I’m less concerned about the tree guy than the embryo guy!
I did not know this. Thankyou, I will research and adjust my point of view :bow:
At the very minimum, this reduces the chance of fraud to 0%. Clearly it is possible to replicate something similar to the levitation shown in the original video.
You're basically storing your energy as magnetic potential. Pretty neat.
> Eastern medicine is basically called quackery in dismissive, quite judgmental, language and so forth.

Medicine that works is called "medicine."
Your [2] source only mentions statistics since 2012. It's disingenuous to think this could spread down to 1901 if you wish to use the 1.8% as a point to argue.

Society was very different a hundred years ago. Women's access to education amongst other things has improved severely over time, and we do have seen an increase in female Nobel laureates compared to the earlier days.

It's a matter of time.
Sapling: Cross-platform, highly scalable, Git-compatible SCM
It has parts where I thought it's AI generated
I think the feature exists primarily because there is quite a lot of flaky software out there that gets „miraculously cured” with a restart. Not having to nanny them until a proper fix is a boon, especially when you know the proper fix isn’t coming ever, or is not possible.

That said, there exist options to determine that restarts are happening too quickly, indicative of a misconfiguration or that it just won’t work, period. See Timeout*.

If this is not what you want, you can always change the restart policy, or specify the maximum number of restarts.

Could be, though, that some software ships with crappy defaults which make it crash all the time and systemd just always restarting it and reporting everything is ok. Not a problem of systemd per se, though.