skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you have admin/root, it's usually easier to just add the leaf cert to the CA trust store.
Not a dev but I use it exclusively on all my systems except those for work that mandate edge.

It's seen great progress lately. The new local privacy-conscious translation is great. Full CTAP2 passwordless now works (though this took way too long). The tab containers are still amazing.
There are many complaints about the lack of numbers. I looked up the study [0] and they indicate that they pull their numbers from the U.S. Energy Information Administration and EPA. The methodology is summarized [1] and explained in detail [2] if anyone wants to go through it.

[0] https://www.andersoneconomicgroup.com/many-gas-powered-cars-...

[1] https://www.andersoneconomicgroup.com/second-edition-real-wo...

[2] https://www.andersoneconomicgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/202...
Not one time and based on different things. Don't look that way
It isn't physically possible for a ferrous material to levitate above a magnet like that, when the magnetic poles are reversed. Basically you could structure it in such a way to generate a ferrous material levitating above a magnetic north pole, but flip the magnet around and you won't see the levitation. They flip the magnet around in this video.
> That annihilates all morality.

Morality is something different from what laws are, rights are, and what crimes are.

> I never said I supported do-gooders

Imposing a moral code on others is what do-gooders do.
I used to think this mattered. But like climate change the worse it gets the more the markets ignore it. Until, until what? Not sure.
The US can default on (choose not to repay) its debt obligations.
More specifically they agree with another similar paper from Stanford's Sinead Griffin

https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16892
I can tell you firsthand that, when I was a minor, it was far easier to obtain fully illegal marijuana than it was regulated substances like alcohol and tobacco.
Society certainly still tries to impose the contract, we just don't seem to agree on what it is. Think about how people reacted (both on the right and the left) to covid restrictions. In some communities you were a pariah if you wore a mask in any context, and in others you were a pariah if you didn't get the vaccine. Regardless of what you think the correct behavior there was, there were very strong pockets of society where shame was being leveraged for some form of social contract, the contract was just not the same everywhere. I believe the same dynamic is true (although thankfully somewhat less charged) when it comes to opinions about various political issues or beliefs.
I agree with you for the most part. There is a massive housing cost crisis. I bought my house 5 years ago for $320k and its worth just under $600k now. For the same house. It makes no sense. Plus its not like I can sell it and get 2 more at the original price. I don't know how entry level salary people could even consider home ownership now.

I don't think decriminalization of hard drugs works without an ample amount of long term money set aside for treatment. Plus money for additional law enforcement to aggressively enforce existing property, violence and public intoxication laws. People should not have to endure a slipping down life because others choose to do drugs.

As far as the why people do drugs, I'm not sure we need that much study. It starts out fun, then it turns into something to numb the pain, then its something that is needed. I've done a myriad of drugs in my time, thankfully I never passed the fun phase. I don't presume to know what drove people to the 'numb the pain' phase and I do feel for them. I am not willing to upend my life or endanger my kids to find out. There is also a limit, how much money should society be expected to spend to constantly on an individual who keeps going through treatment and keeps going back to using? With that said, I do think the number is above zero.

My patience fails though at those that endanger others and commit crimes to further their addiction.
What about simply making pthread_once take a void *opaque parameter that is passed in to the function? You could use this to manually construct a closure.
There's a lot of low power HD screens out there. It's not super difficult. Not the ideal case for sure but low power is all about tradeoffs.
It was a jarring experience going to see a luau there and seeing white kids playing the main roles in their show. Pretty terrible place, really.
Same. Livewire has been transformative for my approach to webapps.
I thought this was going to be some sort of US Dollar-based stable coin. Interesting naming.
And they'd be wrong. The whole raison d'etre of rights, the whole purpose, is to "secure" some good end due to us by nature. It is a kind of "debt" in the sense that we are owed something from others. If we have a right to something, then it is something others must render unto us. Only goods are owed. It makes absolutely no sense to talk about "brute rights" that are just because they are. The burden is on those who claim them to explain why they have a right to something, and that explanation is going to be one that appeals to a good that is due by virtue of being a human being.

If these people you mention took the time to examine the concept of right and had the honesty to search for an justification for them, they would see that rights are always for the sake of some good end, and an end that is due by virtue of being a human being. Take freedom, which is the ability to pursue the good as determined by human nature. A lack of freedom is an impediment to that pursuit in some way. Freedom isn't an end in itself. It is that by which we are able to pursue the good. We do not have the freedom to pursue evil. So it is with rights.
The C++ equivalent is... it just works. Static variables in a function are initialized exactly once the first time a function is entered per the language definition.

This is one of the many great improvements of C++11
I once read a quote, I can't remember where, it might've been in a Buddhist text but it was something like: Your body does not belong to you, it's not yours to abuse. It does not belong to the ego.

I never thought of it this way but it gelled with me immediately and I really think it's true, the body supports the mind which supports the concept of self. So if the self decides to trash the body, something isn't right about that contract.
Again, this is such a weird game to play with words. I'm not sure what else to say.
I am a PhD student in Physics, but I am no expert in condensed matter physics (I do research in computational NMR). Based on my experience with theorists and simulation researcher, I am a bit concerned with anchoring bias and the speed at which simulation papers are being published here. Then again, I don't know exactly what kind of research steps they follow to do their research.
My laptop died due to high humidity in the Amazon rainforest and I had some work to do, so I bought a USB keyboard and installed zsh, tmux, vim, ruby, node and postgres in Termux and worked on my phone. The screen is too small but I could get things done. Sometimes I borrowed my brothers laptop and logged in to my phone over ssh to work.
cannabis tests check 30 days, not 8 hours. Hangovers can happen past 8 hours as well. Balls in your court, w0de0.
Better go reread reflections on trusting trust for the 80th time to be sure?
To me the fact that the US gets to dance around defaulting while still holding a AAA rating shocks the conscience. It’s not sustainable. One of these days there’s going to be an oopsie we just defaulted followed by 1000 articles about why it’s not that bad and we should’ve defaulted a long time ago and it won’t happen again. But the bottom line is if the US government were a person, I’d be a little hesitant to lend him money I needed back.

Points about the military and the strong, diverse economy mean nothing to me. They’re true and the US still barely pays it’s creditors.
You're deliberately misinterpreting what I wrote.

In case you aren't, being able to do what you want with your own body does not include a right to harm others. Remember, we are talking about ingesting drugs, not hitting other people.
I assumed this was some sort of stablecoin and was thoroughly confused.
> If doped such an electronic structure [LK-99] might support flat-band superconductivity or an correlation-enhanced electron-phonon mechanism, whereas a diamagnet without superconductivity appears to be rather at odds with our results.

Sounds like it, if prepared right it could be a super conductor and would NOT be a diamagnet that would display the properties we saw in those videos.
Intelligent Lossless NVMe Over Fabrics (iNOF) technology allows a device to quickly manage hosts, and applies intelligent lossless network technology to storage systems to implement the convergence of computing and storage networks. This document describes why iNOF is required, how the iNOF network works, association between BFD and iNOF, and a typical application of iNOF.
I think this is basically "leaking" things that are intended to be published later in papers and journals.
For people who don't want to compile the anti-debugging firefox themselves, I have set up a github repo to do it automatically: https://github.com/Sec-ant/anti-anti-debugging-debugger-fire...
I assumed as much.
I guess the next limiting factor would be LC delays.
Perhaps not.

I also don't want some cops to be the ones on patrol, out of fear that they might act on strong biases. But I also wouldn't excuse them for pulling someone over and immediately opening fire with intent to kill in order to bypass the problem.
yes but with all this power we’ll be able to render much more accurate models of our demise
> If you read Hacker News, for example, you see plenty of technical grandstanding every day.

Oh, you see plenty of moral grandstanding on non-technical articles, too. It's just as likely to be some strange over-analyzed and unrealistic niche belief system as it is a platform plank of either of the two major American political parties.

As expected for a place which attracts engineers and the like, because one of their failure modes is assuming that they can engineer the entire world. Every major social problem has a "rational" engineering wrong explanation, because all people (including them) are only ever quasi-rational beings.
Welcome to the future where convenience is king, regardless of context.
In practical terms it may mean it costs the government more to buy dollars.
Perhaps if we whine about this in an environment populated with a lot of like minded folk, the message might get through.

I can't help but think that there are people in Google/Mozzie/n Co that simply put up with all this nonsense.

Has anyone, developing a browser ever bothered to think that the audience is quite diverse, that say, there are multiple uses for a browser? Also that there are different people using the bloody things? My wife has rather different use cases for her browser than I do.

The lack of imagination from web browser developers - or at least their directors or specifiers is absolutely breathtaking.

You will have to do rather better than "Here be dragons" etc as a UI for this sort of thing.
It’s Getting Too Hot for Airplanes
Location: Mountain View, CA

Remote: Preferred

Willing to relocate: Unlikely, but not a no

Technologies: Rust, Python, C++ (current); Qt, C#/Unity, Java/Swing, OpenGL (past)

Resume/CV: https://www.spease.net/resume

Email: peasteven (at) gmail.com

I’m a software engineer currently working at Meta on AI systems co-design.

I’m interested in moving back towards more mainstream software development, especially if it involves interaction engineering with emerging technologies, and more involvement in the creative / UX part of the workflow. I am also open to continuing to work in AI for the right project. The most important thing to me is having healthy growth opportunities available.

I grew up with an interest in computers, and worked on a wide variety of projects, starting with game engine development when I was in high school, then professionally cross-platform multimedia application development, robotics systems, biotech, and web security before my current role with AI systems.

I am open to a path leading to TPM, lead/management, or co-founder roles.
in less stable countries they even could have succeeded.

also said guy was just charged. so, maybe there's some hope for that stability.
This could also explain why the original authors themselves say they can only make it successfully around 1/10 times. The stars need to align.
> I believe many overdose deaths were blamed on fentanyl added to heroin, where the user was expecting just heroin.

Not just with other opiates like Heroin, but all other drugs, period. People are dying from fentanyl when they thought they took a relatively safe party drug like MDMA or Ketamine. Much of that would disappear for people who actually knew what they were getting.
I think the new phenomenon is how many people are now on the asshole's side, or are in the neutral "don't get involved" camp.
Updates to our payment account reserves
I haven't seen much of anything on the mainstream media. Just here in hn and other tech sites. Are you making this up?
https://www.findlaw.com/dui/arrests/dui-checkpoint-laws-by-s...

Varies from state to state - in some states they are illegal under state law or state constitutions, etc. Looks like they're illegal in MI.
Thanks, Dr. Freud.

Wait, I don't believe that at all, for the following reasons:

1. The opposite hasn't been true. We have seen two dramatic tax cuts in recent history which absolutely did not lead to reduced spending.

2. The majority of federal spending is for healthcare or social security. Spending in these areas is somewhat hard to change, even with the political will. It's certainly damn near impossible to decrease such spending; it would immediately cause massive hardship for the most vulnerable people in our society (and probably riots riots).

3. The U.S. has run a surplus before and somehow didn't immediately bet it all on the ponies.

Perhaps our modern politics are so dysfunctional that there is no way out.
There's no such thing as a perfect solution. The problems people keep on bringing up are minor and do not qualify as serious problems.
Solid analysis. Perhaps a lot of GenAI startups are SaaS companies? Or maybe that a focus area for YC - intersection of SaaS and GenAI / LLMs? Also some of the use-cases that these startups are targeting do look a light on incremental value add for the normal Joe.
Tiptap is amazing!! I'm using it to create an electron desktop application to help students plan studies and take notes. The app is greatly inspired by Notion, but given the niche, it will be much simpler and easy to use. Thanks a lot for your effort! I can't see myself creating the app without Tiptap.
> Why does the fact that hard drug addiction hijacks the reward circuitry of the brain and is bad not a coherent argument?

Well forgive the repetition here, but because that’s both an incredibly vague definition and because it’s incompatible with a society that values individual agency. Again I didn’t bring up these other examples of sex and sugar and social media to highlight a slippery slope, I brought them up to highlight how odd it would be to attempt to legislate on the mere potential of irrational behavior. Human psychology is far more complex than you’re allowing for here, and only in a more black and white world of neurology, coupled with a world where we thought it prudent for society to outlaw anything with potential to catalyze less than “optimal” (as defined by someone) behavior, would such an argument bear any weight.

> Say a drug causes schizophrenia after using it half the time. Should that be legal? How about every time? What if it kills you in a year after one use?

Yes and yes. A user should be able to consume straight poison if they want to. Again individuals should retain prime control over their bodies and minds, if we are to value freedom at all I can’t think of a freedom more basic than that.

I could imagine the possibility of a drug that has just the right combination of effects to be both irresistible and destructive to such a degree that it threatens to collapse society in such a way where no solutions are obvious where I could see reconsidering as a matter of pragmatism, but we’re quite far from something like that.
If I could upvote this a hundred times I would. Oregon's social services are a disaster and have been for decades. Governance here is a wreck, in part because of badly designed programs implemented by initiative. If there is a constituency for good government here, they haven't been showing up to elections. If Measure 110 was designed to fail it wouldn't have been much different. Unfortunately I think it's going to set back the cause of drug law liberalization by decades.
The Computer Chronicles – Pentium PCs (1993) [video]
- None of my friends use FB any more
- I'll be your friend
You "get a pass" by lying in all situations where you don't get caught.
Wow this article is so wrong in my experience. $50/month for my Nissan Leaf vs $200/month for a Honda CR-V, charging at home.
Reminds me of this video “Interview with an Emacs enthusiast”:
https://youtu.be/urcL86UpqZc
> Hardly shocking. I would be interested in seeing data -- if it's available -- on how much that uptick is due to people with addictions moving to the state in hopes of reducing the odds of ending up in jail over their uncontrollable compulsion to imbibe.

I don’t think there’s any safe injection sites in Portland either, or some safe supply system.

There has to be something in the policy which discriminates between “wrong direction entirely” and “not doing enough”.

Decriminalization on its own seems to be just everybody turning a blind eye and otherwise doing nothing to help, so I’m not surprised that it doesn’t work.
The US devalued shame by using it for everything.

The big change recently is the me-too movement to change from shame into consequences, which is good for people with something to lose

But, with the moves towards feudalism in the states, there's too many people with nothing to lose, and both shame and consequences depend on having some status to maintain
Berkeley's Sinead Griffin.
You can't make a claim, then get asked for sources, and tell them to do a Google search to find the sources lol
> I am totally fine with taking the idea of something being harmful to society and it being banned

I imagine you must be a major supporter of strict gun control. Right?
I did too, and I’m not sure what the best fix is.

Proton has SimpleLogin after buying it, but then they own me forever as much as the next company, with the caveat that they can raise fees. Just your username and (ridiculously crazy, 26 character) password isn’t good enough anymore-“oops, we need to send you an email before you can log in” is rapidly becoming normal.
Shame is a bad thing IMO. It's basically self-deprecation as a result of peer pressure.

The thing is, peers aren't always right. In many cases the masses impose their self-centered views on arbitrary topics. It's not always about something as self-destructive as hard drugs, or even self-destructive at all.

You might live in a highly religious community but have LGBT+ feelings. You might wish to enjoy playing games though your community feels those are for kids. You might like particular kinks that others are frowning upon.

Feeling ashamed because of others' judgment in those cases is purely self-deprecating and holding the person back from truly finding themselves.

In many cases resistance to shame is a great thing and promotes diversity. Avoiding hard drugs is not even a matter of shame but the lack of realisation that a person is destroying themself.
> That's the content of news articles. They were scraping content for republication and now they're not.

That content is provided by the publisher, via meta tags, specifically designed for that purpose. The publisher has full control.

It’s trivial for a publisher to even opt of search engine indexing entirely if they choose.
It also doesn't cover the cost in terms of tying up a major resource: Paramedics, Police and Fire.

Overdoses are at an all time high in Portland. The entity that responds usually gives the person overdosing Narcan, addiction help is then offered for those who recover and 99% of those offered recovery options refuse.

https://www.wweek.com/news/city/2023/08/01/overdose-911-call...

Firefighters (and others) are quitting due to the trauma of responding to these calls over and over and over, with no concrete progress. It takes it's toll mentally to respond these calls which are taking up and increasing percentage of the calls they have to respond to.

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/local/the-story/portland-do...

The main failure of this experiment, imho, is the missing component of forcing detox/rehab/etc when x amount of drug related crimes are committed. The measure explicitly said the addict has to seek the help on their own volition. That might work for alcohol and cannabis, but the vast majority of opioid based drugs are so addictive they can't even fathom not getting their next high or life without it.
I think she's working in a UC Berkeley Lab
The debt ceiling is raised via legislation that members of Congress vote on. They “attach their names” the same way as any other bill.
There aren't any open positions on the website mentioned.
Decriminalization is 25% of the problem. Lack of universal healthcare, well funded housing support, and rehab-to-work programs are the other 75%. Source: I worked in chemical dependency rehab for 5 years. We had a great in-patient residential program that didn't use suboxone as a substitute, but as a bridge to not taking ANY drugs. 7-14 days for most patients and that's it. And we had a huge success rate, but our patients tended to have great support in their lives. The ones who failed were the ones who had no support. Not putting people in jail isn't enough, putting them into treatment is the goal.
Remember- this is by design.
NYC has like a dozen recreational dispensaries right now. Likely not nearly enough supply to meet demand
Supporting legalizing drugs across the board is so naive. If you’ve ever had a family member who’s had addiction problems, you know how much a person’s addiction can wreck the lives of so many people. In some ways, they’re like a sinkhole that just keeps expanding. I include alcohol addiction in this.

That said, I don’t think Portland was wrong with the decision to decriminalize. I think they just did it in the wrong order. They should have had strong support set up _before_ ever going the route of decriminalizing.
yes, but if you reported 100 different substances reaching superconductivity, 100 theorists will publish papers demonstrating their model supports the observation... regardless of whether those substances actually reach superconductivity.

(put another way: it's post-hoc)
Congratulations! Uber is now profitable. But it's probably time for some taxi companies to open back up. These are prices you can compete with easily, and you can pick up people on the street and at taxi stands.

Uber at these prices and with such slow pickups is not better than a cab.
Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
This is the monthly "Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?" post.

It would be great if whoishiring takes this over.

Example:

SEEKING CO-FOUNDER | FinTech | CEO/Sales | US/EU/Worldwide | Pre-Seed

A great idea in the taxation niche, MVP ready to go. Ideally someone with local connections to SMEs.
"the sharing economy" perhaps?

open source lead the way
Yeah, I did not mean to place the why in front of the basics.

The primary is to want to be done.

It all starts there.

How ending it goes really depends on the person. Take it one struggle at a time. Wash, rinse repeat.

Having finished, one tends to look around and ask, "what now?"

And that is what I meant. Have some options for people that are not doorways back.
Is there anything in these videos that is unique to meissner effect? in others words why can’t it be diamagnetism?