skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wish there was a simple recipe. But the principle is to have each focus on the other person's good qualities.

How do actually do it will vary widely from couple to couple. The book The 5 Love Languages may help. It was one of many that helped me.
Great suggestion! We will include ML-based corrections for individual developer mode very soon. For others, even a sign post is helpful. The translation point is a great one that we are also excited to work on.
ahh, the most under talked about part of modern slavery. "But they got arrested for a good reason, so of course they need to do labor to repay society". Yup, exactly the kind of narrative a private prison incentivized to detain people wants to spread.

Shame it will take a much more radical change to how people view prisons to truly break this mentality.
2016 Didn't, I also enabled the built in navigation while I was at it.
I found your original comment very informative. Did you pick this up through your own experiences? Would love to hear if you’ve read anything in particular that helped you form a routine that worked for you.
The seats get warm by running Javascript single page apps which need to be served from the servers, and frequently updated by the company's front end developers to use newer frameworks that make them get even hotter
I feel like I have a mild case of schadenfreude for all of these Tesla mental gymnastics. All of this is one of the reason I am absolutely not an early adopter of technology. I am looking forward to when EVs are equitable range, quick charging and ubiquitous fueling stations comparable to gas guzzlers. I never have to think about things like whether or not it is cold, I’m going up hills, or any of this other stuff. I just drive and when my tank gets low I pull into a gas station and fill up in a few minutes and move on with my day. The only time I have budgeted my gas on a trip is through long expanses of desert driving where stations are far apart.

These are not mental trade offs I’m willing to make. I owe a debt to the early adopters who sacrifice their sanity for alpha/beta testing this kind of tech. A solemn and respectful nod from me to those that have lost their lives due to this technology.
I haven't ever got a robocall on my landline and I get a half a dozen a day on my mobile.
This is naive. Tesla isn't selling the base model below cost. If they did, then Tesla would be wiped out unless people shelled out for the extras, because they'd be losing money on every car sold.

Instead, what's happening is that the current price fully reflects the cost of production, and holding the extras hostage is pure gravy.
https://archive.is/jFea7
Oh my god you’re describing all of my days every day. I’ve thought maybe I had ADHD or something but I’ve never read a more accurate depiction of my day to day.
I doubt most buyers of iPhone care about what port they use. It’s more likely due to really not much exciting things happening in recent updates
The line between genuine content and commercial propaganda is being blurred
It's "winter" and all our fruit trees have come into bloom in WA too. It's not magically better here.
While antique books are beautiful, they sometimes contain toxic materials, particularly in the covers. Rare-book libraries will have some of their volumes kept sealed and only available under controlled conditions. I think the latter half of the 19th century is the most dangerous period, after the discovery of aniline dyes.
I do think it's a pretty cool demo, but I have to say I didn't love that the PR claims Sweep did "manual testing" of the fix. Additionally, sweep reviews the PR and claims that the function is correctly implemented. A sibling points out that there's actually no testing added or done, and there's also issues with the implementation itself. This appears to be a general issue with GPT4 based products, they are extremely self-confident in their language. Presumably this stems from the overall training to work well as a chatbot.

It's very cool that it inferred the right place to make the change and the steps of finding relevant code, making a plan, then doing it are things I wish all my junior developers would do! This is certainly moving in the right direction.
I dunno, I used to use ISO linux images because they were write-once and assuming I had a trusted source of the ISO or system writing the ISO, I didn't have to worry about the Linux system getting compromised and I could just run Linux off a CD/DVD.

I'm surprised that didn't come up in the original article or comments here on HN.

(I am aware of course of non-persistent in-memory worms, and the fact things can persist in places other than the filesystem, but I presume they are much rarer.)
Sorry Elon, you shouldn’t have bought Twitter. This is how politics works in the modern world
Do you avoid the news? You’re in growing company
I post this b/c it’s reminiscent of Bruce Schneier’s take on the news: ”I tell people: if it's in the news, don't worry about it, because by definition, news is something that almost never happens. It's when something is so common that its no longer news - car crashes, domestic violence - that we should worry.”
So I used to use DigitalOcean for around the same intro price point, but after a while I realized that I could pay $22/year for a t4g.nano ec2 instance instead of $72 for the cheap DigitalOcean VPS. I guess in the end, the $22/year was too good to be true and the DO/Linode pricing effectively bundles in the price of the IPv4 address.
Every car manufacturer is planning to do this. Not enough people protested when this category of features first came out.
> You didn’t set the categories

This whole conversation has been about my "false dichotomy" of state and private ownership.

E.g. from LeonB:

> I mean of course — who should own media.. we have precisely two choices, and no possibility to imagine anything else! What you’ve put forward is known as a false dichotomy. That is a situation where you present two options as if they are the only options.
I think the real problem isn't scanning the humans and keeping perpetual rights to use the data without paying.

It's scanning humans without telling them that's what they're being scanned for.

While the stories I've heard may be anecdotal, I've heard people who, as extras on a production, tell stories about being scanned with zero explanation as to why.

If people want to sign away their likeness, fine, but they need to be the ones agreeing to that.
When I run `sudo pacman -Fy units` on Arch Linux I only get a similar tool from plan9port, it's strange they took the GNU version out of the repos.
a different college?
Make a big fuss about how unfair this is, contact news sites, get a trending 'post' and then leave.

The only thing you can do now is add another dent and scuff in Elon's once perfect image, as opposed to going quietly. Maybe with enough damage, people will see him for the monster he is.
Okay, one more and I'll shut up. The app is unsigned (on MacOS) so you can't double-click or command-O it -- you therefore have to right-click and select Open, and then acknowledge the dire warning about running unsigned code. I don't see any mention of this on the over-long install page, so anyone who doesn't know how to run unsigned code on a Mac is out of the game immediately.

And after all that, the app doesn't run. So yeah.

I put off learning python for years because of this ridiculousness. Finally I decided to just bite the bullet, because it just isn't getting any better.
Remember as well that large customers have contracts that require certain notice periods before any price increase can take effect. Even the standard customer agreement requires 30 days' notice.

Assuming they did this (and I'm talking 'add a zero to their pricing,' not 'a 5% bump'), it'd juice their revenue for a couple of years and then it would plummet as folks migrated to more economical / trustworthy options.
I don't answer the door unless the caller knocks more than once. If it's only one knock, I assume it's someone dropping off a package or asking for money, which accounts for about 95% of cases. If I do answer the door, I'm almost never glad I did, though. My neighbors have my number, and generally text me before coming over.

My thought is that you knocking on my door does not oblige me to stop what I'm doing and answer it, any more than someone saying, "sir, do you have a minute for..." while I'm walking down the street obliges me to stop and hear their sales pitch, or seeing an unknown caller on the phone means I ought to pick it up.
They are already growing fish meat in labs, hopefully that and farming will take some of the pressure off the wild fisheries.
I would also love to know. There seems to be a gulf between garbage chromebooks and decent ones, and I don’t want to spend days researching it. :/
"300 baud criminal" is the name of my next band.
I wish you the best of luck. You sound like you are too hung up on your partners last or own insecurities for finding a meaningful relationship.
"Clever code isn't"
Deeper in the article are quotes from people in the era/locale.
As far as I see the only thing you're really suggesting here is that consumer routers should have firewalls that can't be disabled, and that NAT currently fulfills this function.

Much "We're from Silicon Valley and we're here to help" vibes.
I don't have documentation.

I just created large tables, and tried to join, group by, sort them in pg, clickhouse, duckdb, looked what failed or being slow, and tried to resolve it.

I am happy to answer specific questions, but I didn't use timescaledb.
You think builders are going to create rooms people might not buy and not pass off the cost to the buyers, or development company? You have more faith in companies or maybe builders than I do.

Also, how will you keep me out of the room in my house that I didn't buy? You can't effectively.
I'd be willing to make a carve out for the candidates themselves or entirely uncompensated volunteers.

Campaign staff are not welcome.
It's not a personal attack. It's a statement of cause and effect. When a person is programmed to think and believe a certain way, to the point of operant conditioning, that pattern in the brain fires first. By design. That's the purpose.

In terms of the "flamewar" claim, (1) did you also warn the other person? (2) Just because the truth doesn't make people feel good doesn't make it less true. Stoking a flame can be a subjective experience depending on one's personal position about a topic.

> please stop posting flamewar comments as well

Okay. Noted. Will do.
That YouTube channel that pumps out a 'US is going down' video every other month, of course.
>But tbh, I don't get why the press gets to protect a source when the very fact of them sourcing the story is illegal.

Because the 1st Amendment supersedes any laws that are passed to criminalize journalism. Unfortunately our judiciary (and government as a whole) has been going off the rails for decades and our Constitutional rights matter less and less every day.
Leave twitter.
NAT will map an incoming packet with destination WAN_IP:port to LAN_IP:port. It is irrelevant for incoming packets with destination LAN_IP:port.
Something close happened with a used-car dealership where every car got a remote immobilizer added in order to make repossession easier. One ex-employee logged into the system and locked up every car, including cars that were paid off or had been sold to unsuspecting customers.

https://www.theregister.com/2010/03/18/repo_man_hack/
Hah, I posted a discussion on that!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36260116
By that logic, if someone makes it illegal to say the word "cis", then non-cis people are much less affected than cis people are.
> it’s hard to see other places not passing similar legislation when their citizens ask why it’s allowed in the EU but not there.

I'm still waiting for European-style health care in the US. ;-)

We don't have a GDPR-style law either.
It certainly seems to be at its worst when it comes to anything that involves building. So technologies that can run on existing lines without modification might find it easier to run the regulatory gauntlet even if objectively inferior. (See e.g. Los Angeles' sunshade-on-a-pole because it's illegal to build a bus shelter)
It is. I've been trying to offer tips on how it works in my comments in this discussion.

If you want some personal books for yourself, try Meditations (by Marcus Aurelius), The Gentle Art of Not Giving a F_ck, and Atomic Habits. If you want some management books to help with your team, try Peopleware (a classic), First, Break All The Rules (much better than the title suggests), and Tribal Leadership.
Actually, the world has never had greater economic security than it does in 2023.
>Even better not single of my devices living behind only nat in 20+ years was taken over or ransomed.

Yeah, because you didn't turn off the firewall. And/or because your ISP was being nice / competent and not routing packets to you that didn't make sense for your assigned route.
Unids
Now I know where the API gateway and Cognito teams went :P

/s
How so? If you're thinking about Eich's politics, those are/were HIS, not Brave or Mozilla the organization's. Brave the organization's politics are pretty narrow and what you'd want out of a browser: Privacy and user control.

Meanwhile Mozilla the organization boots people for politics, wants "more than deplatforming" and uses as one of their examples organizations deciding what I should see on the Internet - preferring outlets that Mozilla themselves like, naturally. They publish stuff with the gist of "did you encounter other politics on YouTube, how scary".

Meanwhile the organization spends money on getting a sneaker designer to make time-limited color themes for their browser and writes a pile of copy about how cool it is that a sneaker designer painted the browser blue.

https://imgur.com/a/ZmUzr0q

Meanwhile, Brave releases a user-customizable filtering function for their search engine so you, not someone else, can decide from what POV you see the Internet and added native vertical tabs to the browser.

One organization is blatantly political, the other just makes a good browser.

You can run a similar set of comparisons for Vivaldi, who are also clearly a much more product-focused organization and it shows. They have some more visible political leans as an org, but still far milder than Mozilla's, a lot of those leans being just being vehemently anti-crypto, with the biggest focus going to user control and privacy, as it should.
This is focused on the northern hemisphere, but parts of South America are currently experiencing winter temps that are 50+F (15C) higher than average.

These are winter temperatures at almost 100F!

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-04/south-america-extreme...
I'll be disappointed if there's not a cabbage stamp in the mix.
And cost at scale renders gait detection detection and most face detection at scale useless. The sexy movie detection methods all suck.

Go with what works. Just id people via their phones with a dirtbox.
Incorrect, the historical record of Communism leading to famines is very clear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_famine_of_1921%E2%80%9...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakh_famine_of_1931%E2%80%93...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%93...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1946%E2%80%93...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambodian_genocide

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983%E2%80%931985_famine_in_Et...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_famine

The deadliest famine in human history, the Great Chinese Famine, was caused by Communist policies.
First of all you don't need a firm grasp of ito integration to make money at a hedge fund, not even 20MM. Conversely it's not like they just give you 20MM once you've passed your quals.

Second of all it's really not that hard. There are a ton of undergrad books that cover it (along with the necessary measure theory). And then even the bible (oksendahl) can be pushed through with a lot of patience.

At the end of the day ito's integral is defined like a whole bunch of other exotic integrals (as a limit of sums of simple functions, and extended with DCT cf. existence in the wiki) - once you've seen one such derivation you've seen em all. And btw there are plenty of other integrals against processs - like the stratonovich integral (which okay is just a shifted ito integral).

You have to understand that defining things is literally all mathematicians do. once in a while they get lucky and it's useful but the act of defining itself is not some stroke of brilliance.
> Ah, so just needs an awareness campaign!

and machine gun
Right. You are talking about archivists. I was making a broader point of society. Especially for many old books, it is not shocking that the ones that were there to be archived were the pretty ones. Many of the very beautiful things were literally done for rich sponsors.

I fully cede that someone whose job is to archive stuff likely does so for the sake of archival. Even there, I suspect there is largely a bend towards things we see as beautiful; but I grant archival for its own beauty is a thing and most of the bend will be before the archivist is involved.
This is a good idea. A constantly available distraction with unknown usefulness is exactly what people with ADHD need. It really makes you wonder why “a bot that you can drop what you’re doing and chat with in the middle of any task” wasn’t invented earlier.
You saying sarcastically how I could be so silly as to claim only two options, rather than simply saying "hang on, what about option X" and us having a conversation is where this went wrong. A tiny bit of snark is much less rude than that, and particularly when it's in response to the initial unpleasant sarcasm.
>Because, why not? It would be very reproductively succesful.

Eh, HIV has a very specific affinity to CD4+ T cells, which explain the symptoms associated with AIDS.

For viruses that spread either by droplet transmission or true airborne transmission, they must have sufficient affinity for upper or lower respiratory tissues. Usually, this involves an optimization problem where they develop a particular affinity for those tissues and are less effective at other tissues. They then tend to present with... respiratory symptoms.

All viruses are different, but on it's face, it doesn't make too much sense.

There are some respiratory viruses with interesting mechanisms for causing immune suppression to evade the host immune system for longer, but none that I know of work the same way as AIDs.
Winter temperatures above 95F in South America leaves Scientists in disbelief
That one is not blurry for me.
Thank you, you're right, but I can't update my post now. Argh. I shouldn't have added "ignoring ..."
@dang Editorialized title.
>We have to switch to plant based diets.

INCORRECT. We're on the cusp of a revolution in lab-grown fish and meat. It will be healthier, more humane, and better tasting, than the current system.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36593249
It seems ironic that an article titled "Do You Avoid the News?" is published by WaPo. It's almost a threat. "Oh. So you avoid the news. Fine. We'll use our secret powers to get <insert name of politician you don't like here> elected."

But no, that's not really what that article's about. The article is actually worth the few minutes it takes to read it. I think I had tuned out of the news well before the pandemic. I think it's because I had a growing sense that it didn't make sense. Maybe the reporting has changed. Maybe I've changed. Maybe the world has changed?
There's a number of UDP protocols that have large enough payloads to fragment. DNSSEC and EDNS0 in particular made it much more common, though the EDNS0 flag day in 2020 partially undid some of the damage by getting folks to ratchet down their EDNS0 buffer sizes.

1500 is absolutely not a pervasively usable WAN MTU, you're going to need pMTUd if you're sending 1500 byte packets broadly. Plenty of WAN links won't tolerate it. If you don't want to deal with fragmentation at all ... 500 is the minimum guaranteed MTU, but in practice it's exceptionally rare to see anything below about 1200 require fragmentation. But you can always only control what you send, not what others are sending you.
Thank you for the conformation.
Death, but no Binky? Harrumph.
I just did and found that Baidu is the only one to censor all images related to the protests and massacre. Bing may filter out these images when used in China (I tried searching in Chinese with the browser set to request Chinese-language results, this did not affect the search results) but it does not seem to do so for me (Sweden, Linux, Firefox).
So many times I've had people regurgitate this blog post[1], or KISS, or some other general piece of advice to "keep things simple" and it just means they want to influence the shell game of managing complexity so the complexity is someone else's problem--and they can stop thinking about it. I've come to really hate when someone pulls this out as some general principle, because it so frequently means they want to push complexity from an implementation (which maybe has a hope of hiding some of the complexity) out into callers or configurations or some other kind of leaf, where it becomes a breeding ground for manually synchronized configurations, copy-and-paste code promotion (not reuse, which is bad enough, but the pattern where some thing that you're forcing people to manually compile or explode has to be copy-and-modified through an artifact promotion.

Frankly, KISS and its ilk have become more often "things uninsightful people say to make them sound clever and vaguely iconoclastic" than something that can be actually useful as guidance: because people think they remove nuance rather than adding it (KISS is great if you honor its nuances like "and no simpler..." and "considered as a whole"; but instead it's a thought-terminating cliché). I've heard people use these sound bites to justify, e.g., the entire notion of automated testing (too complicated), or "infrastructure as code"--though I also dislike this term and favor "software-defined infrastructure", though maybe if it became popular, objections that software-defined infrastructure isn't really software would become as common as objections that infrastructure-as-code isn't really code.

-----

[1] I don't mean this literal blog post, I mean the same kinds of "don't be too clever" platitudes.
Yup, it's a bit frustrating since it's a problem with LLM, RLHF and fine-tuning for chat. In fact, we also added in the prompt to not say that it did testing. I find that in general it seems really difficult to tell a language model (especially 3.5) to not do something.

The self-review generally catches stuff like this since we tell it that this code is written by an inexperienced developer, so that Sweep becomes more critical.
The most common book from the 16th century (and onward) to survive to this day is the family bible, so it was less about beauty and more about religious devotion mixed with the Reformation promoting a more accessible liturgy.
Why are all capitals red there?
> which makes it useless as a bioweapon.

So why use timers on bombs then or have land mines, why not just kill immediately?

So bioweapons with an incubation period are still valid and makes it hard to prove who is behind it, and plausible deniability is a form of stealth bio weaponry.

If I put a tick carrying this bio weapon strain in your coat at a conference, you would not know it was me, because of the incubation period, assuming a 100% infection rate, just like you probably wouldnt check your coat for ticks before putting it on.

So why wouldnt it be anything other than a bio weapon, if it was man made and used in such circumstances? The only people probably safe from such risk of it being used against them would be scientists who could come up with a solution or cure, if one doesnt already exist.