skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Its kinda like gang rape. the majority just decides they must have what the minority has and then they just take it no matter what the minority says.
Fill you in about what exactly? And what do you mean by "without search"? There is contemporaneous reporting on the matter available online, it's going to be more useful for you than someone's twelve year old recollections.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2010/06/apple-delays-white-i...
Being forced to work against your will at Mcdonalds sucks* being forced to have sex against your will is rape. Rape is considered by almost all countries to be one of the most heinous crimes imaginably.

I also don't have a source but would you agree that the amount of people being forced to work against their will at Mcdonalds is much lower than prostitution?

Your comment was trying to say "what's the line?" right? Like why should one profession be banned but another allowed if X percentage of people are forced to do Y against their will in each.

The line is rape, multiple rapes day in and day out.

*I assuming both still get paid some amount even though they are forced.
Microsoft is not doing so great in the security department right now.

>Microsoft comes under blistering criticism for “grossly irresponsible” security

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36979532
If we were sane zoning would require a minimum units per acre. Which means you can't build single family houses that size.
While I agree with you on the face of it, that's extremely impractical.
This definitely warrants criticism, but these comments are way over the top. If you want to use margin as an instrument for whatever you're doing, that's fine. It's not a terrible advice.

There's a lot of useful stuff you can do with these sort of loans, just like you can with borrowing against your 401k, using things like HELOCs and even bouncing around credit card debt using balance transfers.

Think of debt as a power tool - learn how to use it, rely on common sense it, use plenty of PPE, and don't get unnecessarily hurt.
Waiting to see either way just like everyone else, but..

> I'm actually surprised by the sheer lack of people commenting in the more-or-less-perma-LK-99 threads who show skepticism of the results.

.. really? You’re surprised by this?
Sure. But you could always do that for any tags, regardless of - even in opposition to - their official semantics.
> This comes across as quite bizarre, as though you believe Apple Silicon Macs are a combination of TSMC chips and Apple software, rather than Apple chips (manufactured by TSMC) with Apple software.

No, it's deliberately bizarre. I'm speaking to specifically all the ridiculous nonsense I've read on HN from Apple fanbois trying to convince the world that these are so good because of magical synergies of Apple software with Apple Silicon.

Apple seems to have designed a good chip, TSMC manufactured it. I don't deny either of those things. The same can be said of AMD.
Last time I checked with some lefty people, you wouldn't, since the worker would be too scared to possibly lose job/pay over critiquing their employer, so they would be heavily incentivized to say anything keep the status quo.

This is about being forced against your will by another person or group of people not because you need money, a situation almost every person who works is in.
I’m really sorry about your mom.

Your story is a good example of how shame can be harmful, it may have kept her from seeking help. That is certainly a negative effect of shame as a behaviour moderating factor, and I’m sorry that it affected your family in the way that it did.

I think your response is the only valid counterpoint I’ve seen here, since most people seem to think I was talking about shaming people or that shame would somehow prevent addiction… none of that was my point. But your story is a good example of how exactly what I was talking about can also have harmful effects, and that is an excellent point.

People should never be led to believe that seeking help is shameful.
How are title errors even a thing? You can't accidentally give someone my email or bank account, but you can accidentally give them a house?
> If we put bounds on the bank in SPP, the first coin toss would still have positive EV.

Not if the bank starts with $0. 0 is just as valid a bound as a trillion. You can’t calculate the EV without knowing how much the bank has, and once you know that, you realize the naive calculation for EV is wrong.
They have much larger plays and interests than developer software such as Office/Outlook. Also stops Google from making the same deal as OpenAI needed credits from someone.
JLL unveils first GPT model for commercial real estate
> They can do impressive reasoning already.

By no conception of reasoning I'm familiar with do LLMs reason, at all. They are clever software systems of an advanced sort of autocorrect/predictive text kind.
25k of added consumption saved would be 43k of interest gains in 15 years in his "line always go up" world view. 43k is over 6 month living expense for me, and I get to keep the initial 25k.

I wish I would have spent more money in my 20s, but not 25k worth.
Well I mean who do you expect to be advocating for this? It doesn't exactly ruin his credibility that he's part of it. I think it just enhances his credibility.

Come to think about, this point is stupid: it's as if you can say, "This person who wrote this article, has previously written articles having the same views. We need to consider that they are not neutral."

Would the assumption of "neutrality" (unrealistic, because is anyone really ever?) change what they're saying?

The point I guess is not to ad-hominem and appeal to authority, but to assess the things they say on what they say.

This point you're saying makes no sense to me: why should we discard what someone says because they have a stance? Everybody has a stance. I don't think we ever expect anyone to be neutral.

In conclusion, humans can't really be neutral. They're biased. But that's OK. You shouldn't be basing your conclusion of information based on your authority-assessment about the individual, but basing on what they're saying.

It's a distraction from what they're saying, and it's meaningless.
We speak with more certainty than we really have. There is a lot we don't actually know.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27658488

Animals are adapting.

Namibian Desert Lions Spotted Hunting and Eating Marine Creatures

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19029210

Animals are also evolving. New large species are emerging before our eyes, like a crossbreed of coyotes and wolves and a crossbreed between polar bears and brown bears (sorry, failed to readily find supporting articles).
Well, I think the saying kinda implies that the conditions are the same. Obviously, common sense dictates that doing the same thing when conditions are radically different can yield different results. (For instance, taking a deep breath is usually good for you. But doing so underwater is obviously not.)

Of course, this then leads to an argument over how the conditions differ in the example where the saying is used, like with MS here.
You pool your payment providers using something like

https://hyperswitch.io
I’m guessing the person you’re responding to wasn’t clever enough to figure out that your comment was completely off topic and had nothing whatsoever to do with the article. Only a true genius could see that you saw “openai” and hit the post button with the force of Mjolnir.
If I must vote with my participation then I choose to vote by using Brave as my browser. They’ll making choices I agree with more than any other browser currently.
The comment I'm replying to says:

> But this is purely a result of the distribution of returns from a single toss.

Your examples contain two tosses.
> That’s why X has filed a legal claim against the CCDH and its backers.

CCDH has published the letter they received from Twitter, as well as their response:

https://counterhate.com/blog/letters-from-the-lawyers-musk-t...

the "legal claim" language Twitter uses here doesn't make it particularly clear, as far as I can tell it's only that cease & desist letter, and not a lawsuit (yet)

here is the report that Twitter is objecting to:

https://counterhate.com/research/twitter-fails-to-act-on-twi...

> Researchers collected tweets promoting hate from 100 Twitter Blue subscribers. The tweets were reported to the platform using Twitter’s own tools for flagging hateful conduct.

> Four days after reporting the tweets, researchers found that Twitter had failed to act on 99% of the posts and 100% of the accounts remained active. In the one instance that Twitter removed a hateful tweet, the account from which it was tweeted remains active.
Totally agree. Evidence is more valuable than confirmation, but confirmation would show leadership and restore trust.
I’ve been doing something similar recently that impressed me. I have been taking handwritten manuscripts from the early 1800s and feeding them into AWS Textract and then feeding the raw OCR data results into Claude2 or GPT4 to have to it make sense of the horrible OCR from the handwriting.

I was even more impressed feeding it handwritten French documents like patents from the same time period. AWS Textract only works with English so even with it’s ML OCR of trying to make English words from the French handwriting, it was still workable when telling the LLM I was feeding it French text that was OCR’d even though it all kind seemed like gibberish when looking at it.
I would be surprised if politicians and regulators even know what a web browser is, so this might be a tough sell to them.
Kentucky was the first topographically mapped state in the Nation and the only one I think to be completely geologically mapped in detail. I think that's pretty cool.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36979532
Thank you very much! I just spent the last 5 minutes in wtf mode trying to find an option to change my password.
FWIW, Derek Lowe writes about this (and seems excited to see the results of the upcoming trial): https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/new-mode-cancer-tr...
Teslas at least are rated for the lifetime of the car, but it’s fair to say the chance of them getting replaced is higher than zero especially if you drive it a long time and brake aggressively.
“current bankroll” is the issue here. 1 * 1.5 * 0.6 = 0.9 < 1.
> The log-scale here complicates my intuition

Logarithmic plots are a device of the devil. - Charles Richter
> The rates and the terms of your credit card debt can change overnight.

That's not true for the promotional APRs he is relying on, they are fixed for a certain term and can't just be cancelled by the company.
I’m assuming that part of the issue is the crazy amount of internal company data people have been feeding into the thing. Finding your email password might let me see some memos, but if you’re not very thoughtful, you might’ve pushed all sorts of sensitive data into chat prompts.

I don’t disagree with your premise otherwise, and grant that I might be racing to begin with.
Ask HN: Why is ai.com redirecting to x.ai
ai.com used to redirect to chat.openai.com but now redirects to x.ai, what happened?
Counterpoint - I wish someone had explained consumption smoothing to me when I was younger. One of my greatest regrets in life (literally) is not taking on more debt in college for exactly that reason.

People do it all the time and to far greater extremes. A mortgage to buy a house to raise a family at 30 instead of waiting until 60 is also a form of consumption smoothing.

It doesn't seem like they are being particularly risky. They have a large buffer, and a solid like of credit for more student debt. Who knows, maybe their student debt will even get forgiven.
Totally agree! Ridiculous how tight-lipped and tight-arsed they are about this. Even Mellon a former IC person, says the coverup is ridiculous and there's satellite photos that should be shared with Congress and high resolution imagery that could be shown to the public without compromising any "actual tech owned by the government".
Obviously you would need an exception for calls you've given consent to receive.

But then companies would stick consent in every form license on the internet. So you'd need some kind of cookie banners that require you to give consent explicitly. But then you might miss the box you actually wanted to check opting in to appointment reminders from your doctor and then miss your appointment. So maybe we allow default opt in under some byzantine circumstances that require everyone to hire a lawyer to understand which also has the effect of exempting political donors so that everyone can continue to be inundated with calls.

What was the downside of letting people set inbound fees again?
Surely more correctly, they would be translations of transcripts of recordings.
If you read the footnote it says he filled out the FAFSA himself
Infinite Hamlet: Typing Shakespeare via twitch chat
No, it was in response to the correct comment but I should elaborate.

> Leaning on a proprietary solution also means you're downstream of any decision the makers of the tool make, including choosing to nuke your (and/or your business's) use case.

My understanding is that OP is advocating free/libre software protects a business from changes in software that could affect the business' use case.

This risk is present in both proprietary and free/libre software. Maintainers may remove features that some users find critical. If a feature is removed and your business requires the feature, you now need to maintain a fork of the software or contribute development time upstream.
Not sure how US tax works but in Australia an individual can borrow to invest and deduct interest.
The UFO thing has been bubbling in media since 2017, long before the balloon fiasco. I don't know what you mean about drones, but the guys (apart from Grusch) are not randos in that they've been involved in this for a while.
I find this statement one of the most astonishing things said on HN that I can remember.

The entire history of US foreign relations in South and Central America and the Middle East (at least!) is dominated with compromises similar to this.

It's difficult to know where to start a list!
Rats do not live an absolute max of 2 years in captivity.
Over time it does not.

A related concept in finance/trading is “drawdown”. A single trade can have a positive expected value. But over time, if you take a loss you have to get a bigger win to end up back where you started, because you have less capital to work with.
Yes, that seems to be auth0's default password change story [1]. It's annoying and not expected from the so-called leader in authentication.

[1] https://auth0.com/docs/authenticate/database-connections/pas...
Haha! It's pretty funny, like people are so inured. Government has basically confirmed we are not alone and alien life exists, and people are like "Meh, what actual news is there?" hahaha
There doesn't need to be a practical reason for something to not be popular. Popularity and merit are not the same thing.

Web components aren't popular because they haven't become popular yet. There is a lack of sufficient network effect moving in that direction.

Once they start becoming popular, the issues with them (which are relatively minor) will be resolved quickly and improvements added.

Why are most of our cities and cars still designed with fundamentals basically the same as in the 1930s? Not because there aren't better designs. It's just momentum.

High technology is like that still even though nothing physical needs to be changed.

Humans are herd animals. And the rationalization for behavior comes after the behavior not before. We subconsciously copy what other people are doing. People use React or whatever flavor-of-the-month.

Give it a couple of years and many of the flavor-of-the-month frameworks will probably be built on top of web components.
> [Y]ours is an Iranian study that seems to have no peer review.

Fair enough. (I intend to find a good & recent survey paper still but chores have come up, so it'll have to wait a few hours.)

> Have you.. talked to any trafficking victims? Any sex workers?

Not personally no, I only know what I've learned of their positions through articles I've read and documentaries I've seen. Why, have you?

> Drug addicts would like drugs to be legal, oil barons would like there to be no natural protection laws, prostitutes would like prostitution to be legal.

Why are you equating prostitutes with oil barons of all things? This seems like a list of people whom are often viewed poorly, and I can only infer the rhetorical function here is to tar prostitutes through association. Which makes me doubt the sincerity of your concern.

> And what do you think has changed about sex trafficking and prostitution in 11 years?

I'm sure the state of those things as they relate to the internet has shifted, but not importantly what I was suggesting was the understanding of this field of research has probably changed dramatically in 11 years.

> Right because you squash the market.

What market has ever been squashed by prohibition? Alcohol wasn't. Drugs haven't been. Prostitution hasn't been.

> Arguing your trafficking victims should get better health care is worse than just having meaningfully less trafficking victims.

There won't be fewer trafficking victims, or other sex workers who are victims of abuse, we'll just have disclaimed responsibility for them by declaring that it's illegal and excluding them from polite society. The abuse we'll continue, and the comfortable can pretend it doesn't exist because it's been brushed under the rug.

Additionally, it absolutely does matter if we can provide services. For the example of drug use, the appropriate healthcare (eg Narcan, needle exchanges, treatment for addiction) can make a night and day difference for survival. Sex workers would be safer if they weren't stigmatized and so more likely to be believed if they ask for help, if they were able to operate in the open with hired security and vetting processes, etc.
I'd love to see SWAT teams called to deal with door-to-door missionaries.
You've obviously never had so much as a single friend who was a SW.
I use Brave. There has been reasons & will be in the future as well.
It's the opposite for me. Cloudflare presents me with so many infinite "Are you human" check boxes when using Tor that I decided to never pay a single cent to that company unless we found ourselves in a situation were there was no other choice. Thankfully, there almost always choice, with most vendors now offering very good alternatives. I work in government IT procurement.
An owo in a firing letter, ooohhh noooo.

*notices your lack of employment*
Elon Musk Creates New Artificial Intelligence Company X.ai <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35575754>
You're unemployed and have $25,000 in credit card debt. This is some impressive post-hoc rationalization, but it would have more credibility if you wrote about it before you went into significant personal debt. Otherwise it just reads like cope.

And btw, I've been where the author is, so I recognize the signs. Let's check back in three years.

My advice: get a job. (I see the author is currently an intern in college. So I'll amend that advice to be: line up a job for after graduation.)
YMMV, but I often advise my friends up north:

1. open a First Home Savings Account (FHSA) as it doesn't trigger a tax event when matured [tax free income capture]

2. open a Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) [tax free capital gains] when a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) [deferred income tax] event can hit you harder later

3. The returns on Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GICs) are now well over 5.4%/18 months. Some report these near zero-risk products hitting over 6.2% in some places. Highest we've seen these in several decades, and a good choice to hold in a tax-efficient account if you don't have time to manage portfolios.

4. Chartered Banks have depositors insurance limits. If you are stuck with cash around for various reasons, than you will end up having accounts in each of these banks eventually. (lending institutions are a different risk, as they usually focus on insurance sales.)

If you have the cash issue burning value due to inflation, than you may want to consider these options till you figure out a safer plan.

If you have under $1m in a registered self-directed RRSP trading account (stocks/bond purchases), than the stock-market statistics are simply not in your favor. A legally bonded fiduciary financial advisor is the only people who are obligated to be honest with you, and can help match ETF/index-funds to your risk exposure profile. After many years, one will determine evil and or stupid people often affect your pocket book in pretty much the same manner.

Always talk with a few people before triggering a financial commitment: your lawyer, commercial accountant, and __bonded__ __fiduciary__ financial advisor.

It would be crass to suggest all banks externalize risky garbage-products on customers, but I have yet to meet one that didn't try.

Best of luck, =)
I use ChatGPT as a word calculator for literally everything all of the time. It’s super great for achieving proper formatting easily!
Really strong DRM on audio files is pretty silly because it's so easy to workaround, if you've got an audio signal going to speakers you can capture/record it no problem.
In other words, the codomain needs to be a vector space.
Do any Brave users compile from source.
The difference is that for the average Polander, cutting 10% of their income means substantial significantly less purchasing power without lots to gain.
A Question. NYC has a law regarding surprise medical bills:(https://ag.ny.gov/resources/individuals/health-care-insuranc...). If I understand that law correctly hospitals/facilities can't bill both in and out of network piecemeal billing for care if they are supposed to be in network.

Would this mean the app is less useful once you are already admitted to a hospital in NYC that I know has a lot of care in my network? How does it help in such situations if we assume the law may not always do so?
> Has there been some new release of prostitution, like a 2.0 where they updated the security to prevent abuse?

This is the wrong question. A better one is, "has the way prostitution and sex trafficking relate to the internet changed?", but the correct one is "does a 2012 article reflect the current understanding in this field of research?"
I'm not asking about the company but rather the URL, ai.com used to be pointing to OpenAi now it points to Elon's x.ai company, why?
Err, no. Compromising your email account will for sure be the worst outcome.

Everything else, including your OpenAI account, are accessible via that email account + a password reset.