skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
See my other answers for more on that.

I will say that it isn't easy. But the flexibility that can come with being a programmer really helps.
The game was originally set to be released in September but they moved the release date of the PC version up to avoid Starfield. Presumably, they had to scramble to make this date.

The PS5 version was not moved up either.
Yes however I get that in TS and Rust while also having stronger type guarantees. I don't think pattern matching is an alternative to static types, it's a supplement.
> There are neurosurgery robots operating with my code running in the background for several years now. I am now working on ophthalmic surgery software for sub-retinal operations. I would think that is actually kind of pretty "cool!".

That’s super cool dude! Surgery robots are pretty world shattering for the people whose lives are saved by them. Contributing to that sounds like something well worth feeling proud of too.
I am very ok with building my own car if it comes to that. It's the cretins willing to actually go along with bullshit like this that are the problem.
Is there a reason for using LAB as opposed to YCbCr? My understanding is that YCbCr is another model that separates luma (Y) from chroma (Cb and Cr), but JPEG uses YCbCr natively, so I wonder if there would be any advantage in using that instead of LAB?
Reading this makes me want to press a reset button on humanity.
Allegedly,

1. Other companies have more accurate estimates than Tesla.

2. Tesla uses a different and more accurate algorithm when charge is low.

3. Tesla's estimates used to be more accurate.

It doesn't make sense to argue the problem is intractable when it has supposedly been solved by many companies, including Tesla itself.

>Why would you expect it to factor in _potential_ weather when giving a range estimate?

I wouldn't expect that. The cars have thermometers.
It's very cool. Some things I noticed: fluency scores are always None for me. If you ask their name they give a different one to the diarised name! Thirdly they come in very strong, above my level so I find it quite hard to use.
I haven’t used commanded, exmachina, or ash:

- Tesla has a mode which can be used completely without macros, and I am increasingly encouraging that it be the only way that it is used. So does the author (as of 2020): https://github.com/elixir-tesla/tesla/issues/367#issuecommen...

There is also `req` mentioned in a recent post as an alternative (it looks good, but I am still playing with it to see if it is a suitable replacement for Tesla in all cases).

- Absinthe is something of a compiler itself, because it has to strictly define things the way that is specified in the GraphQL spec. You can now import an SDL file, but you still need to hook resolvers and middleware into it. Honestly, I don’t think that the schema definitions in JS/TS are much better for GraphQL in terms of readability.

Being heavily macro-based means that there are sharp edges that are harder to work around when you want to add your own macros for code reuse purposes. That said, aside from the schema definition, Absinthe is entirely usable without macros. Within the schema definition, Absinthe isn’t making anything up, it’s using the same basic definitions that the GraphQL spec do, adapted for Elixir syntax.

Exmachina didn’t interest me because I don’t think much of factory_bot (which used to be called factory_girl), as I saw it abused far more than used well (IMO, it’s impossible to use correctly). Ash…looks like an interesting experiment, but I don’t know that there’s a lot of pick-up with it compared to Phoenix. And I have yet to find a use for CQRS/ES, so there’s no reason for me to play with commanded. I certainly wouldn’t consider any of these three to be "major" players in Elixir. Tesla and Absinthe? Yes.
I'm not sure how you arrived at those numbers, but I'm sure an LLM somewhere will agree with you soon.
I always wondered if this still worked with a IR/UV camera too...?
Overall, I agree. It means nothing if he's terribly demure though.
the shitty error messages and poor tooling are the biggest problems of nim imo.
Its overall a great language otherwise
> Attacking the length of an argument rather than the thrust of the argument is an Ad hominem fallacy.

Its a fallacy but its not ad hominem. (Its non sequitur, but than most fallacies are specialized forms of non sequitur, so that doesn’t really narrow it down much beyond saying it is fallacious.) There's not, AFAIK, a common catchy name specifically for “argument to the peripheral stylistic features of the opponent’s argument”, though there maybe should be, because in practice its a common fallacy.
>> The most rational thing we can all do is lower our standards.

Or improve ourself. One is lazy and leads to unhappiness. The other will help all areas of one's life.
I wish Apple would make a handheld gaming device and make it work with steam similarly through the proton layer like Valve. I'm sorta hoping by putting this into writing it might bring it into existence.
Sometimes human nature is the flaw.
I just don't see it. It's just such a pain in the ass to store and handle. Locomotives are actually a better case for batteries than most, because you could keep the batteries in a secondary car, much like a steam locomotive tender, that can easily be swapped out on a siding when needed in about 10 minutes... or just chain as many together as you need for the trip.

Trains, especially freight trains, aren't that weight sensitive, since they tend to mostly roll along at the same speed.

Such trains could be fitted with a pantograph and operate directly off OHLE when possible. Actually, don't recall the class but I'm fairly sure the UK has a variant of one it's commuter EMU with a small built in batter. The route it travels has a few miles without wires where is impractical to add wires so it uses batterys to cover that gap.
Some things about our nature we have to accept, we cannot change. Other things we can change a bit, but make allowances for, and some things we can change a lot. There's a cost of time and effort to change things about ourselves and our lives, and everyone has different abilities to change.
Will do healthcare and a car eventually right?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246646/
And we don't even know how the things people say he did were stupid will turn out. For example throwing away an established brand seems foolish but who knows.
I really thought that the current lineup of Macbooks would be a big driver of growth for a while. Then again, the ones worth upgrading to are really expensive and that is probably keeping a lot of potential purchasers on older versions.
But convert them to grayscale how?

Black and white film doesn't have one single colour sensitivity. Play around with something like DxO FilmPack sometime (it has excellent measurement-based representations of black and white film stocks).

It's a much more complex problem than it might seem on the surface.
To make a windows bootable USB you need windows.

Doing dd (or cp) will make a device that boots the installer but ultimately will fail to install.
Going by Siri, they are behind competition by a wide margin.
The cars are just very different. MachE is a car with batteries. Model Y is an iPhone with wheels. Trying to buy for a single spec is a bit of crapshoot anyway.

I also suspect the range gap is more than 13 in winter, as the model Y has more advanced heat pumps.
I agree, this will probably be more impactful than the Vision Pro. Making all their products way more useful. You can already run Llama on a Mac and it’s pretty great. When Apple release theirs it will probably be a very nice experience.
I think the bigger question is would it be stable enough. Many SD like models struggle with consistency across multiple images (i.e. frames) even when content doesn't change much. Would he a cool problem to see tackled.
My son has anxiety. That's no fun. I'm glad I don't have that.

I'm sure a psychologist could load me down with some list of diagnoses if I was particularly curious. I haven't been curious, and I'm rather skeptical about the current state of psychology.
The recipient of the call would have zero incentive to mark any call as legitimate, so this system would not work due to sheer apathy. All calls would automatically be considered illegitimate.

Unless you're proposing to also fine people 10 cents for every call that they receive that they don't mark as legitimate or illegitimate? That's not going to be popular either.
>using this for business purposes is anticompetitive

Businesses not trusting every random person is not anticompetitive. Doing that is how businesses make bad deals, get hacked, or make bad decisions.
Offering this pile of money will attract creative fraudsters. It must be someone you trust that can help with your search, and chances are that someone won't need your money.
India and Nigeria and growing really fast though. China's population is going to collapse over the next 50 to 70 years.
> You have provided a great example of how worthless cold calling is to society.

I think you are missing the big picture.

Assuming that we waste 1 minute of time for 90 people, and everything else is productive, it’s:

- 90 minutes of aggregate inefficiency…

- to benefit 7 folks who have a much better understanding of the market for their current and future needs…

- and 3 people who are scaling their business for years via delegating something they are not good at to folks who are.

I don’t know about you, but I’ve had many many dud 90-minute encounters (much less one minute encounters) that were all worth it for the one encounter that moved the needle. This could be sales leads, training, dates, finding new restaurants… there are many domains for which this is true.

Frankly, I think that this is a fairly efficient ratio compared to most value-seeking activities in the world.

Edit: Note that the close rate was close to 40% live (versus 10% calls) with a non-significant n, so I think the medium itself was one source of inefficiency. The product was clearly needed by our leads, but trust-building was tougher over the phone.
It's a fairly good video game recreation of DnD? That's the best way I can describe it I haven't finished it, but it's pretty massive with tons of dialogue options/builds, turn based combat, so far I would highly recommend if that sounds appealing.

EDIT: same people made divinity original sin II if you're familiar, it's a similar vein.
But the suggestion that tesla was lying seems already far fetched.
If anything their adertising was misleading.

>The more-and-more it is proven that your "just lying" is a coordinated effort across your company, the more and more it looks like fraud to ... well everybody.

But there is zero evidence for this. There is no lie here. At best there are misleading statememts about performance.
The backup seems to always try to backup more stuff to hit that limit forcing you to pay.
If it floats, Flys, or fornicates it's cheaper to rent than buy.

Rule of the 3 F's as told to me by a pilot.
It’s unbelievable really, I thought protection rackets and preventing shops from opening without payment would be illegal.
FreeCAD 0.21 Version Release
"Hot Superconductor Summer"
Why is A[LN]PR unlawful for private citizens to perform on their own footage? (e.g. using https://www.openalpr.com)
Duh... Sample selection bias, non-response bias, or even the wording and ordering of questions can significantly impact the results. On top of that, political opinions are complex - a small sample might not capture the diversity of opinions across different regions. Relying solely on this method could lead to a skewed or incomplete understanding of the true political landscape.
Are there any good resources for generating art for games? (pixel art or otherwise)
I'd be concerned about dating anyone who has $100k on the outcome of our relationship. Like, whose to say I would be more inclined to marry someone than to lose $100k if push came to shove.
If it includes 3rd party 1B would not be high enough.
This is my daily driver too.

On Android there is an app called CalcEs which emulates it.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=advanced.scien...
Years ago, I watched a Y Combinator startup school video. The presenter was talking about their standard company structure, registering the company in Delaware, standard vesting schedule (four years, one year cliff, 1/48 per month).

One of the audience members interrupted, his co-founders had discussed their vesting schedule alot and thought it was better, he started to explain.

The presenter interrupted, asking why are you wasting time, energy, and brain cells on discussing vesting, and not spending it on THE PRODUCT, product market fit, MVP, customers, schedule, and THINGS THAT WILL MAKE YOUR company succeed. Vesting is binary, it either pays off, or more typically is worth zero. Don't waste the group's time and certainly don't waste VC's time on vesting. During your pitch, vesting should be exactly one sentence, the standard. Anything different makes you look clueless and not focusing on the PRODUCT.

There are a number of actual matchmaking services in San Francisco and Silicon Valley.
Now lets do the the same for Mercedes and any other car manufacturer who starts to try this crap. Good to see stuff like this happening.
You can apply that reasoning to every product or service. Do you actually have any knowledge on this?
The premise is that the enclosure is already somehow breeched. Squeezing a battery is bad and it makes bad situations worse.
> Hi, we just started building a few weeks ago but have about 700 beta users. We are building the most effective specialized AI for ADHD.

I'm sorry, but that statement just irks me. If you're only a few weeks into development, how can you honestly say what you're making will be the "most effective specialized AI for ADHD"? It's an unrealized aspiration stated as an inevitability. I don't think stating that you're "trying to build" or you're "goal is to build" would be so irksome.
We evolved visual and hand dexterity for considerably more than two millions years (more like hundreds of millions, I don't care to go find out when hands first evolved but the neural crest was 550 million years ago), and we need many, many more than "only few examples" to be able to draw hands, let alone a sentence. This is something you could only possibly say if you have never tried to draw a realistic hand. There is a reason that long before AI image generation was publicly talked about, many artists joked all the time about how they could draw everything except hands correctly. Hands are particularly difficult to draw. If anything, it is genuinely interesting and maybe worthy of research as to why hands are so hard for us to draw and why they are so hard for these DL networks to draw, and if the reasons are related.
On the other hand sometimes you can improve speed by replacing a variant with a branch. I've done this when I know all the threads in a warp will usually take the same path and removing variants allows me to reduce the number of draw calls.
It really is bonkers. I wonder if it was the case of a VP with a pet project who pushed it hard to ship, got a promotion to a different org, at which point it was promptly canceled.

Only makes sense if it had a line of sight wireless AP in it, like 40 ghz or (to a lesser extent) the new 6 ghz band.
I don't want to get that involved.
PER is >30. For a company that size, with interest rates at ~5%, this is very high by historical standards.

But then, we have Tesla and Nvidia which make them look like a bargain.
> Is that alleged? I saw only the support telling customers that this is expected. "There is nothing wrong with your car, don't bother comming. It is expected that sometimes your car gets galf the range." is not a lie at all. It seems absolutely truthful and in fact the total opposite of exaggerating the range of the car.

It demonstrates that their original range claim was a lie.
At least in France if you have a serious accident there’s a technical examination of your car. If the insurance company finds out you tampered your car software (debridage) you’re left without any coverage.
> Can you take a black and white photo of an African-American woman in the 1930s and accurately colour her skin?

AI colorization will, in general, be plausible, not accurate.
What is the significance of said meeting?
Think they’ll find growth in India, Indonesia and Vietnam
The European perspective is broadly to have the "freedom from", whereas the American one is the "freedom to".

You've got the freedom to aquire an arsenal, I don't, but I prefer the freedom from other people gunning down my kids, which by extension limits the narrow personal freedoms of myself and others.

Likewise, the American perspective is to draw a hard line on "in public", the European one is more nuanced.

Yes, you can film your vlog without fear, but a random pedestrian in Berlin also has the freedom from being associated with your public vlog.

Therefore you have a responsibility to either get their permission to broadcast it, or to anonymize them.

A useful way to think about it is to shift your view from "can I do X?" to "will I bother anyone else by doing X?".
People don't generally drive 200 miles in the city in one stretch.
sure they became a multi billion dollar business by not being cost effective
Inside the online world of people who think they can change their race
How was anything destroyed? the original grayscale is still there.
Automotive leasing is basically “personal mobility-aaS” and it’s wildly popular.

Decomposing that lease cost into a bunch of small feature pieces is really about better price discrimination + fewer “SKUs”.
I don't think I agree with your moral stance.

If I buy a car, then, yes, "my hardware my choice". Software should be no different.

I personally think end user license agreements are immoral. If you want to attach conditions to use, you should have to spend the time to work out a proper contract, executed by both parties, with consideration provided on both sides.

But I still think that's weird. To use your "commercial use" example, if I buy a lawnmower, the company that sells it to me should not be able to dictate that I can only use it for personal use, on my own lawn. If I want to use it to mow my neighbors' lawns and charge them for it, they can't stop me.

Copyright licenses like the GPL are interesting. I've released software under the GPL in the past (though these days I usually choose more permissive licenses like Apache or MIT). The GPL itself is essentially a hack that rides on our current awful copyright law in order to creatively subvert it. If our copyright laws were more reasonable and more aimed toward benefiting the public commons, we may not even have a need for the GPL; it's even possible that big parts of it would be unenforceable in a more reasonable copyright regime.

Just a note on this:

> If you agree not to use the software for commercial purposes when you purchase it, you can't morally decide "my bytes my choice" and just to use it for commercial purposes anyway

While this may be true under current law, there's nothing inherent in the universe that makes it this way. We as a society have decided that, legally, some things are out of bounds when it comes to contractual obligations. As an extreme example, you can't contractually sign yourself into slavery. No court (in the US and quite a few other places, at least) would consider that contract valid. The idea that you can sign away your rights to use a piece of software commercially is not some absolute moral good. We could decide as a society that this sort of thing isn't ok, and enshrine it into law.
In perhaps a similar fashion to how prediction markets commingle the entire spectrum of information from insider to random guesses, this would seem to be casting a net over a spectrum ranging from close friend to complete stranger.

Those on the former end are already somewhat incentivized without the bounty, while those toward the latter, for whom the monetary incentive is the greatest, are the least well-positioned to deliver. The higher the bounty, the greater the pool, but it only widens at the far end of familiarity, so premium bounties would seem to be a waste.

Perhaps the rationalist response to that would be that there must then be an equilibrium point for the bounty, but I’m not sure how one would even begin to empirically establish it.
Teslas, Roombas and Rings...

https://cybershow.uk/episodes.php?id=12
Or the dog alerted on nothing, since they have a bonkers false positive rate: https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/sniffer-dogs...
Are you looking at a different article? In my reading of the linked article there are three anecdotes of ~200 mile trips, most assuredly not done at 30km/h.
I hate the word 'cis' so much because it sounds like 'cyst'. Why would they not pick a better word.
Intentionally misleading people.. is exactly the definition of lying?
In other words, bullshit.
Unpopular opinion, but it’s not like these developers are getting nothing from Apple out of this.

Apple runs the modern digital mall. They provide the space, the signage, the discovery, they even handle payment for you.

Also, small indie developers are only being charged 15% until they exceed $1 million. So the 30% you always hear about are the big fish that can afford it anyway.
> If you believe Musk on this

Seriously, you shouldn't believe Musk with regards to lawsuits.

If Musk knew anything about law, he wouldn't have been forced to buy Twitter last year. The world was revealed to how ignorant this guy is to the law.

-------------------

By the way, this is a civil case, not a criminal case. "Illegal" is almost a non-sequitur.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fraud

> In civil litigation, allegations of fraud might be based on a misrepresentation of fact that was either intentional or negligent. For a statement to be an intentional misrepresentation, the person who made it must either have known the statement was false or been reckless as to its truth. The speaker must have also intended that the person to whom the statement was made would rely on it. The hearer must then have reasonably relied on the promise and also been harmed because of that reliance.

All they have to do to successfully sue here is prove that the other side was "misleading", and that they "knew about being misleading" (intentional), or even the lower-standard of recklessness (they didn't know they were misleading, but they didn't do enough research to prove their own statements true before telling customers).

Welcome to Civil Law. The standards are much lower than criminal law. But its just money, so that makes sense.
Quick math:

24 frames per second * 60 seconds per minute * 90 minute movie length = 129600 frames

If you could get cost to a penny per frame, about $13k? But I'd bet you could easily get it an order of magnitude less in terms of cost. So $1500 or so?

And that's assuming you do 100% of frames and don't have any clever tricks there.
I would probably go with Javascript and Supabase, this would require you to only really worry about the frontend. Javascript is also probably easier to train people because of how many resources there are out there about training people to write Javascript. Supabase is also has a great free tier which will help your nonprofit. Hell, you might even want to try to contact them and they might give you a better tier for free they are really friendly there.

Elixir is great, and developers love it but training new people without a solid development background might be hard.
Serious question, is there any enterprise gear made today which does not support IPv6? I have assumed that the natural hardware upgrade cycles made it so 99% of all active equipment could support the technology, even if it was not configured to do so.
I Want to Like Matrix
How can it affect the lightness channel when it is locked?