skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We trade ten million dollars a day of shitcoin derivatives using zig. Should be more soon :). We're probably stuck on 0.10.1 until async makes it back in though.
If the CEOs are "complete idiots", make your own work-from-home company and compete with those complete idiots who demand going to the office, and let's see who wins. This is how it works. Other than that, whining "my boss is an idiot" is the national pastime of the average worker for centuries.
They aren't banning cars. They're requiring special permits. That's a difference. In effect, they're banning cars for the masses and keep them for a small group (the wealthy, all sorts of delivery drivers, officials).
It's not just iPads. I don't know a single person who uses tablets. Why bother with a tablet, if laptops could be as small and are also way better for productivity? MacOS is also far less restricted than IOS allowing you to do much more stuff on it.
Epic is a bublic company. Valve is a private company.

In Steam's terms, they make clear that they will do everything they can to maintain your access to your games, even if they close shop. Of course, that may not be much, but I think Valve cares more about the customer than any other company listed above.
Where did he/she even mention Rust?
> I’d guess so, as you apparently can’t read a basic graph and yourself deny the reality of climate change: “this is fake” “absurd temperatures”.

and you should go back to kindergarten and learn how to read and understand text.

I said I wouldn't believe it because the chart to me looked like a temperature chart, I didn't see anything there that shows temperature anomaly, probably because I overlooked it. Plus, there were no news articles by the time I wrote that comment that stated what was written on the tweet. I'm not blindly accepting everything I read on the internet as a fact, so I am a climate change denier because I questioned a tweet from a random, unverified user?

> Are you going to tell me that Amazon deforestation is a U.S. lie to make Brasil look bad? That your economy isn’t dependent on the pillage of the environment?

What about your country and all the other "first-world" countries that have erased all their forests from existence and are trying to lecture emerging countries how to "save the environment"? You can't even preserve your own green space or approve projects to restore it, yet you try to poke your nose into something that is out of your jurisdiction. What about your economies that are dependent on funding shady companies that do the dirty work for them, pillaging emerging countries for their natural resources and trying to portray the "save the environment" person?

Truth be told, companies like these exist everywhere, not just on the southern hemisphere, and if they are active, it means there are buyers, and believe it or not, the top destination for these deforested resources is Europe.

> I’ve spent enough time in Brazil to know that the average Brazilian doesn’t know or care about the environment.

I don't know where you've been, but I can tell you that just because we don't talk about it everyday it doesn't mean we don't care about it. You're not brazilian, you don't know how we live and some people have other things to care about, i.e., how they are going to get their food on the table for them and their kids, before they engage in a discussion like that.

Are you also going to say we are dumb enough to not care about health? Let me remind you that once we got the COVID vaccines, millions of people went to get vaxxed and it was quick (ignoring the bureaucratic parts, obviously) because even though our public health system is sacked and barely gets any funding from the government, we managed to distribute the shots in a timely manner.

I'm sorry but you're just being an imperialistic prick with a classic "oh I'm from X country I am immediately better than everyone" argument.
Ukraine isn't a major power, and the fact that they've been able to hold back Russia so effectively, with so few resources, is mainly an indicator of how weak Russia is these days.
The cool thing is that getting high-temp superconductors makes all the things you list more likely to happen.
https://www.digital-science.com/tldr/article/the-lone-banana...
Injury Reserve said it best: Fuck it, jailbreak the Tesla
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWQL_XORalY
It kind of is, for anyone without bias against languages that have a GC.

However they could at least support some kind of enumerations, one of the things they definitly aren't a better C.
Maybe as a bioweapon its not so effective - but as a vector of bioweapons research, its extremely useful.
There's Hypercorn too.
Thanks this is a good article.
Do you have any source for scene reconstruction being hollywood-quality given 50+ images 10 years ago (assuming the images don't come from a controlled environment)?
I can find for example this from 2016: https://substance3d.adobe.com/magazine/go-scan-the-world-pho...
However, there's still a lot of manual work involved, and you don't easily get near-perfect PBR textures (which would be what I'd consider hollywood-quality).
I'd say the devil is in the details - if you want the best quality, you'd still need to control a lot of the environment.

The more assumptions you can bake into the parameters of some model, the more degrees of freedom you get in the actual measurement process (e.g. reducing the amount of actual data necessary).
> 1. It's typically at least as fast as C, unlike C++/Rust

The typical urban myth that never comes with profiler proofs.
>I feel no restrictions regarding Steam. If anything, it enables me to enjoy my purchases more, not less.

experiences are different. I play/read a lot of VN's and Valve's policies for approving those are like throwing darts on a board. I simply got tired of reading one VN and having its sequel mysteriously rejected a few years later. That's frustrating to both me as a gamer and the developers. I don't feel like picking up a pitchfork everytime and simply will avoid Steam whenever possible.

and on a very personal note, I find the Wine workaround as just that. another flimsy point of failure waiting until Microsoft does what it is historically known to do. It doesn't encourage much linux gaming for me nor does it make me feel like I'm supporting linux gaming by using it, because it's at the mercy of yet another conglomerate.
Another way to look at this is to say that the massive uptick in Steam Deck users is really good for the future of Linux gaming given that if current trends continue with the next version of the Steam Deck it may well get to the point where it becomes worth it for developers to focus on native Linux builds rather than being Proton compatible. Especially in cases where Unreal / Unity takes most of the heavy lifting away anyway.

I'm not overly optimistic given that the biggest barrier to supporting Linux has always been how much variance there is in terms of what's out there, but it's still a good thing for Linux.

In terms of perceptions of desktop Linux I don't really think it matters. Linux isn't going anywhere and as software probably has more penetration right now than any other operating system ever has.
Magnetic containment reactor designs become at least an order of magnitude easier if we have room temp/pressure super conductors.
And marriage rates are down significantly too [0] because... you don't have to?

I was born in the 80's and I grew up with nothing but cynicism and pessimism about relationships and marriage; even then it was something like "40% of marriages end in divorce", or that most relationships don't last and that the few that do and get glorified / romanticised is survivorship bias. It made me think "What is the point?". Add that with a load of repeated messages that men are shallow and horny pigs that objectify and abuse women, it really wasn't encouraging.

[0] https://ourworldindata.org/marriages-and-divorces
Agreed. And another large part of "media", which didn't exist in the 80s: social media.
I think that much of social media has become more blatantly sexual. In the earlier days of Instagram people would post pictures of themselves in scant clothing or somewhat "compromising" positions but always under pretense of something else. It would be accompanied by text in the form of a "thought provoking" quote and/or refer to something in the background of the image. The poster would be trying to say "this is not a picture of my bottom in a small bikini at the beach, it is a picture of the beautiful sunset and I just happen to be in it in a small bikini". People would poke fun at others for posting "thirst traps".
Today it is done blatantly and people often refer to their own posts as "thirst traps".

But perhaps the case could be made that this horniness has been taken out of advertisements, which seem a lot more timid today.
It is funny how people put everybody in the same bag.

There are many kind of linux users, and many reason to use linux. We don't all agree on the why and the how, which is one of the reason there are so many linux based OSes/distros.

And that is fine.
Please don't. M. Kaku is a quack.
The eventual Lemmiwinks/Wikileaks thing was freaking genius
Organic Chemistry: A 10th Edition
I _think_ the argument is that the emulator runs on a per-frame basis, and the treatment of very short sub-frame-duration button presses may be different?
Your hypervisor can boot from any file with bytes in it that the bootloader will handle. There's no dependency on the file being in ISO format.
"gun restrictions, and strict self-defense laws in Europe are huge limitations that all contribute to vastly decreased personal security for me and my family"

Even in germany it is quite easy to legally own a gun. All you have to do is be a member of a Schützenverein ("shooting club") for some time.

What is indeed very hard, is get permission to carry a gun with you.

But your main point seems to have been about home security and having a gun in your home is very possible. Unless you live somewhere with tighter gun laws than germany?

(Also most abductions for ransom happen outside, easier to snatch someone from the road, than come into his home)

"To add to all that, attackers have a huge asymmetric advantage during an attack, as they have the surprise element."

But you can also surprise them with security, they were not aware of and after that initial attack advantage, time is on your side. (Emergency call and panic room).

"It's not like you can just hire a bodyguard and suddenly you are safe, in fact this can make things even worse in some circumstances."

Yeah, because a common bodyguard mainly creates visibility. And the best defense is to not let the attacker know you exist as a target. But there are security guards, that are not visible to the bystander.

And all in all I have to say, that you do sound quite paranoid. And I cannot think of too many professions, where that paranoia in europe is warranted and where you do not have professional security assigned to you, or where you do in fact get permission to carry a weapon. If the walls you build around you are too tight, you eventually just build your own prison.
As a counterpoint - as a non-American millennial watching American movies as a child I couldn't understand why there should be sex/romance everywhere. I was not watching romance not to say erotic movies, just action, comedy, horror - yet every director felt obliged to add a pinch of sex everywhere. That felt pretty awkward and weird.
thanks. indeed i was using the term pentest very loosely, too loosely.
Ballot stuffing with candy crush?
The diagnosis is a continual process. My psychiatrist first did many questionnaires with me to determine whether it might be ADHD or something else, and then prescribed ADHD medication (first Strattera but that gave me significant side effects, now I'm on Concerta).

But this doesn't end with the prescription - I visit the doctor every 2 weeks and he continually questions me about the effects the medication has on my life, and tries to see whether it matches the expected outcome for a person with ADHD. If it did not, they would change the diagnosis.

In my case, everything fits - the stimulants make me slow down or even sleep, I'm less angry and overall more emotionally stable, less impulsive, and finally able to work on a task that I choose for an extended period of time. If this was not the case, I'm sure the doctor would be looking for a different diagnosis.
There's 3 main parties to LK99.

L&K, are two PHDs taught by their now dead former professor. Their research into LK-99 is inherited from their former professor but they lacked funding, hence it was a hobby project for a long time, and they needed funding to work on it full time.

The Korean professor: A professor who started taking interest and sponsoring the project for the last few years. However, he likely didn't participate directly in the research much.

The American professor (Ethnically Korean): A professor who was brought in rather recently (Maybe last 1-2 years?), to help bring credibility to the team. He is probably the one with the expertise to perform measurement and ascertain that it is a superconductor.

The Korean professor got kicked out from the team for unknown reasons. This was evidenced in the April paper published in Korea, which lacked the Korean professor's name. Quantum center also removed him from the website.

4 months later, he was back with a vengeance, and published the paper, with only him, and L&K on it (ie, the 3 man paper). The Korean professor possesses no sample, and also lacks the original data for LK-99.

A day later, the american professor hastily rushed out another paper (The 6-man paper), with L&K, himself, and 3 irrelevant lab assistants.

Since the earlier Korean paper in April got 0 attention and was treated like a typical troll paper. They probably assumed posting on arxiv was just good material for later legal battles, but they could otherwise continue happily researching and patenting their material.
However, interest in LK-99 exploded like a nuke, because the first signal for credibility: That two professors were in a bitter battle over authorship, did not escape people's eyes.

2 days later, the Korean professor had a presentation at a Korean conference, but attendees were disappointed by his data and lack of samples (Prediction markets hit a low of 15% at this point).

However, the American professor took control of media communications, and quickly dissociated with the Korean professor, yet he completely stood by the claims of LK-99. Now the American professor has talked to numerous Korean media and directly sent an exclusive video to NYT.

Its interesting why L&K chose the American professor over the Korean one. Needless to say, if this works out, the interpersonal saga will end up in a Netflix documentary, and probably many court cases.

I should also note that the nobel prize is likely a secondary concern for the group. They aren't in a comfortable academic position where money is only a bonus. They were struggling PHDs for a long time. Nobel prize money is too little, and will come way too late to make a difference for their lives.
L&K and the American professor are likely trying to maximize the value of their patents and know how to sell to investors, rather than to make public verification ASAP, which would be optimizing for a nobel prize.
I really doubt this thing that experience with multiple people makes you better at sex. The physical aspects of sex are dead simple, and not that exciting.

Everyone but the exceptionally oblivious, will know their own body better than any partner could hope to. Better sex (beyond a low point) comes not from some esoteric physical technique, but from what goes on in people's heads, "horniness" in the article's terminology.

More likely you get worse at it as you age, and all the clever things "experience" can come up with to make things spicier in the brain-part of sex, only partially makes up for not being (as) young and not exploring the map for the first time.
I wonder if the body positivity movement has anything to do with the de-sexualization of reasons to be fit.

In many circles, if I were to say that I wanted to be more fit in order to attract the kinds of people I'm attracted to, the main answer I would get is that I shouldn't feel the need to change anything about myself - that someone who would be more attracted to me if I were to work on myself isn't worth the effort. I heard this from my sibling-in-law constantly. Honestly started to think they were just trying to justify their own disregard of their health.

I started a 430 lb 6'4 man. I'm 320 lb now and while I still have a ways to go, the difference in the attention I get is mind boggling. Women actually flirt with me now. Initiate even. As someone who's felt invisible for a decade, I can't describe how much my mental state has improved.
> It's weird that all movies seem to play in a parallel universe where everyone looks like the fittest people ever.

It's not weird if take consider commercial cinema for what it is - an escapist fantasy meant to induce short-term pleasure in the viewer. It's much more pleasant to look at attractive members of the opposite sex, than at the ordinary people.
Most frequent words on 468 replies to this thread:
https://pastebin.com/jJNKs2C9
Any future society where this is actually possible wouldn’t give a damn about the dead person’s endowment because they’d be so far beyond property rights at that technology level.

That one Star Trek TNG episode from 1987 had this right. The accidentally discovered 21st century cryogenists are stunned to find their former wealth and status are irrelevant in Picard-era Federation.

I think the question at that time would be: “Do we bring these likely brain-damaged people into a world they can’t understand and which would cause them pain” — and the answer might be “No, that would be cruel”.
Parallel, and much worse. Everyone out in the software land with their open languages, free compilers, and package repositories doesn't know how bad it is in FPGA land.
It’s that, yeah. But also it was pretty overt too, people just forget because they’re oldies now

- “Hot for Teacher” Van Halen, 1983

- “Love in an Elevator” Aerosmith, 1989

- “Cherry Pie” Warrant, 1990

- “Shook Me All Night Long” AC/DC, 1980

- “Paradise by the Dashboard Lights” Meatloaf, 1978

- “I’ll Make Love to You” Boys II Men, 1994

- “Baby Got Back” Sir Mix-A-Lot, 1992

- “Black Dog” Led Zeppelin 1971

- “Brown Sugar”, The Rolling Stones, 1971. Off the album “Sticky Fingers” no less

Those are just the ones off the top of my head. But yeah IMO music hasn’t really changed much. People have and continue to love singing and listening to songs about bonin’.
Part of the problem with industrialisation is that humans don't have instincts for it. One of the lessons of the communists vs the fascists vs the capitalists through the 20th century is that none of them had any coherent vision of how to build a prosperous society.

It just turns out that capitalism is the most compatible with liberal values, and if people are left alone they build a prosperous society through emergent behaviours.
What's nice about AGPL is that, as per Google's policy, it serves as an automatic ban from your software being used at Google, including non-networked applications like Android. Some people have said this is a downside or that Google's policy represents a red flag about the license itself, I see it as a good thing that the license makes them nervous.
Can you add a link to a screenshot?
>I cannot download an app on Android and run it on Debian

Yes you can on the android emulator. The biggest issue is compu arch in that case.

> I cannot compile a program on one version of the same distro and run it on another version of the same distro

Yes you can for the most part (unless it uses a capability provided by a newer kernel which is super rare and mostly limited to system tools, and less for "apps"). Actually that is what makes containers and flatpak possible. It even works accross different distros as long as cpu arch is the same.
The fact they run in hospitals doesn't mean it's a good thing... Hospitals were duped into using MS products. Today, this is a major plague in the health system of many countries few people realize the extent of.

In short, the problem MS created for medical / hospital equipment is that by trying to ensure they control the software, they made the hospital staff incapable of using the software to their own benefit. Hospital research today is archaic in its practices compared to virtually any other field because of how it relies on Microsoft products. Usually, it's a bunch of people manually filling Excel spreadsheets and doing a lot of other things that would've been trivial to automate by hand.

Hospital / medical equipment is not validated well by various bodies established to do that (eg. FDA or similar European bodies) because the technology is proprietary and validation, essentially, relies on companies submitting their internal research results to get the equipment approved.

PACS and similar systems are designed and implemented by companies who don't understand how hospitals work, and aren't interested in learning that -- the typical enterprise model inspired and encouraged by the use of MS products, where deals are made between high-ranking managers w/o any attention to the actual needs of the personnel who are supposed to use the software. And this is again, because MS conditioned hospitals not to use open-source software, which also resulted in no internal talent / expertise growth. So, doctors in external clinics and even inside the hospital, even though connected by their computerized system, don't know how to use it well, or, sometimes systems lack important functionality.

By bribing their way into medical system, MS committed the largest crime in its history, much larger than anything it's been taken to courts for. Countless lives have been lost or severely impacted because of MS profiteering. But nobody really talks about it because these numbers are hard to count. It would be very hard to sue them for this as this is too broad and hard to get concrete evidence of... but if you had ever interacted with the hospital computer systems from the inside, you'd see this plain as day.
>either because the Linux version was outdated, unmaintained and buggy, or it simply performed better.

Sure, I can see that. My solution to that one day will hopefully be to make sure devs can keep their linux platforms updated, not give up and go around it with a windows build.

But Proton discourages that, not encourages. As you said, Steam doesn't want you to know what build you are playing, and if the audience doesn't know, then the devs won't care either.
Better to do science out in the open and let the results speak for themselves.
That's... really making a lot of assumptions. What do you mean by "get any of the others to commit"? That's saying the woman in question had to apply force, and that it was ultimately the other's fault they didn't settle.

I can go on, but, it sounds like you and many others in this subthread have some really weird and ingrained manosphere-sounding ideas about women and relationships.
Any time I hear about callback hell I put my face into my hands and cry on the inside. Callbacks are functions. Surely, people can apply some basic organization to their code. I guess not. I guess some people are utterly and desperately reliant upon some form of syntax to tell them what to do next. Crying commences.
> a premature preprint

Considering how that preprint has sparked interest in other research institutions and multiplied the resources allocated to the problem, I would say this publication was not premature, it's most other research results that are late.