skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I hear the Great Lakes area is popular for people desiring someplace safe from climate.

Indeed, that is where I am headed. Appreciate the discourse.
I’ve done this about 50 times at this point with various strategies and have gotten ghosted on about 40, been told they aren’t hiring on 5, and told they had been fired on the other 5. I’m not sure this one works very well, at least at lower YoE.
> then spin up N workers

And how do you do that?

Because...that is also what the multiprocessing module does.
I haven't read the terms of service, but would headless browser automation be a safer solution?
Where are you getting this "single month" stuff?
Or sea rise. Or droughts.
I was recently reading The Almanack of Naval Ravikant (great book btw), and one of the interesting things was he spent all his after-school hours in the library, for years! (It was a circumstantial thing)

But it's such a great way to get into reading, and feed your child-like curiosity with the best resources.
https://archive.ph/YtUlz
I flirted with that but never used it. What was it like?
> Yes I am referring to NMEA string usage because that's as good as you'll get if the PPS output is not connected.

1. That's only true with a super, super naive approach. You can easily estimate the average latency as part of your prototyping, and subtract that (while "live") from when you receive the full NEMA string. That will knock down the (in)accuracy by at least an order of magnitude, probably two, depending on latency variance. NEMA messages are (almost[1]) always sent synchronously with the PPS.

2. Again I'm having trouble imagining this naive hardware setup where you don't have a better timestamp than 1 second. NEMA usually comes over a UART, so just timestamping the first byte of the NEMA string will give you ~millisecond accuracy. Even a cheap USB 1.1 UART dongle that only polls at 125Hz should give you ~10 millisecond accuracy. As above, you can estimate average latency during development to improve accuracy during usage.

You'll need to do a little bit of software filtering to remove outliers, of course, but that requires no extra hardware.

The point is: The technical bar to getting 10ms accuracy with no special hardware and no PPS is basically zero.

[1] I'm hedging with almost, but I've never seen a counterexample.
What if Infrastructure as Code never existed [video]
> quieter

... except 2013 Macbooks. Nothing like sitting in meetings, opening up the shared document for review, and having that fan turn on.
Security exists because of the meaning of the bits. If those bits represent credentials to your bank account, then "recoverable" hits different.
I'm glad that expectations are shifting. At the extremes, it's either a fancy parlor trick or a hyper-intelligent god. A lot of the original hype has skewed much closer to the hyper-intelligent god side of the spectrum. It's definitely not a fancy parlor trick, but it's likely closer to that than the other side it's being hyped as.
I'd go further and say that the AI doesn't even perceive it to be "correct". It's just saying these words are likely to follow those words.
The article has a variety of things wrong, such as the school system in Finland. Like most places, there are national curriculum standards. But not only does that not make all schools equally effective, private schools are still possible, including ones not specifically approved by the government. In those instances the local municipality monitors progress and issues certificates. The schools cannot be for-profit but then most private schools in the US are also operated as non-profits. In short, the idea that a wealthy person can’t buy a better education for their children and is thereby incentivized to ensure the public schools are excellent, that is not true. If you’re looking for a reason why Finland has excellent schools, it’s not “Rich people have no other choice”.

https://www.aacrao.org/edge/emergent-news/private-education-...
Hi Peter thanks for this.

European, PhD, what's the fastest way available for me to get a green card?

I've heard of the investor visa, but I can't invest 1mil, or hire 10 people.

I've also heard of the H1B, but from what I understand that means years of uncertainty.

I've held a L1B, not sure if that matters.
Pretty much what I came here to say. As a young system administrator, DNS was the second thing I learned after setting up my first Apache server and I didn't find it hard to learn at all.

I will admit that it when you get to a certain point, you have to be careful not to shoot yourself in the foot when operating a production system but that is a slightly different concern which is more implementation dependent. Eg BIND.
Or similarly, one listing low-rank in performance and quality of social programs and asking: was this Oregon or Mississippi?
Here's what's cool about the article:

- Presents some nice theories which make things hard to learn (infrequent use, poor tools...)

- Describes how DNS tools could be improved.

- Gives you a few gotchas for how one may shoot themselves in a foot with DNS.

Here's what's a bit (not much) less cool:

- I really have no clue if those things ACTUALLY make things hard to learn (because it's not a research paper on learning).

- It's a plug for other content on the side which actually describes the DNS protocol. I'll admit the sold content looks cool. I haven't purchased and can't vouch for the actual quality.
I am in similar situation, except wife is in India with younger kid and I am in US with elder kid in university. I am told there is a good chance she will be denied tourist visa even if not yet applied to GC, as rest of us are US citizens. And she will be denied tourist visa after applying for GC.
To me the problem should be modelled similar to what we have now:
Some institutions (private or public) giving an ok or not ok on the keys. And platforms choosing which institutions to trust. At some point we may have platform choosing all governments+trustworthy institutions

You could make things like a "smart contract" returns your money (or triggers an investigation) if after 48 hours you report an issue with your account or transaction. Of course this would mean some change on the blockchains themselves
Who said "one month"?
CDC Finds 20 Infectious Agents in Unlicensed California Lab
Plus now with ChatGPT, you don't even have to write the comments.
Just ask it. (I'm sure this will be easier than paper clips)

Human> AI please fix the Environment

AI>... Analyzing, ... Analyzing ... Analyzing

AI> Eliminate Humans

Human> Wait, wut, hold on a minute

AI> Launches Nuke's.

AI> Biosphere will recover in an acceptable time period and continue un-abated by humans.
> The rule of thumb is that 3 years of professional experience is the equivalent of 1 year of college education.

I know you don't make the rules, but on the surface it would seem that these numbers are switched around ;-)
> Anonymizing a huge data set like this is impossible.

That depends. The entire dataset of course because it’s everyone’s student records. But you can probably subset it to the extent that it’s still useful and perturb enough to protect individuals and be statistically equivalent.

And you could also generate a bunch of aggregate results that do stuff like identify average grade differences before and after periods while correcting for other differences without including individual identifiers.
Rational Shift-Left Security for Developers
The web browser gives us an extremely frictionless development and deployment process. Our CI generates a fully deploy at a unique link for every commit which lets us open and test PRs with a single click. It deploys updates to users without needing to make them go through an updater. In these relatively early stages of our development process, the importance of the velocity that gives us cannot be understated. Plus, the ability for users to try it out in one second is quite helpful.

I've designed the whole architecture specifically to avoid the web UI "feeling like a web app" with the subtle latency of interacting with the site. I wrote all-custom UI components using the minimal amount of HTML and CSS to achieve the requirements instead of depending on an external component framework which always loves nesting dozens of `div`s inside each other to achieve what should be doable in one or two. And our highly-lightweight JS which calls into Rust (Wasm) lets it keep the slow logic out of slow JS. And we are using Svelte to move most of the frontend DOM management logic from runtime to compile time. This architecture really helps us keep performance levels as close as possible to feeling native despite using the web for its GUI rendering; and I believe it has succeeded at feeling responsive by comparison to most other web apps you use (even Slack, for example, which shouldn't be nearly as complex).

Web lets us build fast, deploy the latest version to users fast, leverage prevalent developer experience with HTML/CSS for creating GUIs, and avoid getting stuck in a box with Rust's currently-immature GUI ecosystem. That's the tradeoff we had to make early on, and it was a good decision. But we will eventually move towards a fully native version...

In the short term, we plan to use [Tauri](https://tauri.app/) which is sort of a hybrid between Electron and a native application. It uses the OS's webview to shrink the shipped binary to only a few megabytes and reuse shared memory resources with other webviews at runtime. It also runs all our Rust code natively instead of through WebAssembly so all the business logic in Graphite runs natively and only the thin UI layer becomes dependent on web tech for the GUI display.

In the long term, we plan to rewrite the entire GUI in [Xilem](https://github.com/linebender/xilem) which is the up-and-coming Rust GUI that I believe will finally get everything right, including performance (which is something many desktop GUI frameworks are actually bad it, and sometimes even worse than web). We'll still deploy a web version but at that point, it will become native-first.

Hopefully that roadmap and explanation of the architectural decisions clears up any worries about the short and long term state of our GUI.
> if we (Cloudflare) decided to make Cap'n Proto be a public-facing feature of the Workers platform.

How likely is this? What would be the benefits and use-cases of doing this? Would it be a standardized JS offering, or something specific to Workers that is deserialized before it hits the runtime?
There is still a 1:1 relationship with accounts and people. They have just cut out some extra steps when the original account creator does whatever it is the 3rd party wants them to do manually.

That some people might use their Worldcoin account to do things on behalf of someone else is a different problem from the one OP was referring to.
a friend of my is a full time expert witness. he went to school for an engineering degree and did 1 year of industry work. he now provides expert testimony on technical cases all over the country. they fly him out to nice hotels with a generous per diem. he gets paid very well. they give him the materials to present in court. it’s a very well paying position
If by "solving" you mean "refuse to do anything at all unless you have the exact schema version of the message you're trying to read" then yes. In a RPC context that might even be fine, but in a message queue...

I will never use Avro again on a MQ. I also found the schema resolution mechanism anemic.

Avro was (is?) popular on Kafka, but it is such a bad fit that Confluent created a whole additional piece of infra called Schema Registry [1] to make it work. For Protobuf and JSON schema, it's 90% useless and sometimes actively harmful.

I think you can also embed the schema in an Avro message to solve this, but then you add a massive amount of overhead if you send individual messages.

[1] https://docs.confluent.io/platform/current/schema-registry/i...
-If you mention anything about medication, boomers will immediately assume you're taking "meth" because they know the medications have some sort of amphetamine component.

-People who think neurodivergence == lazy/undisciplined/shithead/whatever.

-People who don't understand ADHD will assume you're like that kid in elementary school who was always setting things on fire and interrupting class (and there's a good chance you are, but you've developed management skills by now as to not do that at work).

-People who sort of understand ADHD and know you won't be as mindlessly heads-down as other employees so you're likely to not take well to corporate bullshit/want to work on things you find stimulating rather than <insert banal maintenance task>.

-People who understand ADHD too well and can keep the dopamine flowing just enough to wring you dry until you burn out.
I'm kinda taken aback by how I haven't come across this yet. Thank you so much for sharing!
If I understand correctly, this is about combining multiprocessing and multithreading?
In a first, scientists find genetic cause for ‘virgin birth’ in animals
A good video about how that came to be:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vd1gqLVHZWo
Don't forget that you can also remotely attest a server... in which case you can get guarantees on how a corporation is manipulating your data. For instance, you could make sure that your data is reasonably secured and not shared with third parties. So I don't believe remote attestation in itself favors corporation, it really depends on how and where you make use of it.

Sadly the adoption of "trusted computing" on the server side has been slower than expected. Maybe because of lack of user pressure? Also my guess is that most companies prefer not to be too transparent regarding how they process our data...
The intent of the comment was not to say the process is trivial or that removing PII is sufficient. However, it is not as impossible as people are making it out to be. I’ve worked on datasets at social media companies where literally thousands of columns were considered PII but realistically removing/scrambling just a subset of columns would make it impossible to identify individuals.
I don't know if they have a reach outside the upper Midwest, but that seems to describe Schwan's. They have a wide variety of premade foods ready for reheating or cooking (e.g., cheesy potato puffs). Haven't gotten food from them in a while, but I remember it being pretty good. At least, far better than supermarket frozen meals. I've actually been known to follow a Schwan's truck until it stopped so I could buy on the spot :-)

They typically have a number of households on a weekly rotation and deliver in temperature controlled trucks. You can buy food when they show up at your house or if you're well-organized, preorder.

They probably also ship.

Ignore the "salmonella vanilla" remarks: that was a long time ago :-)
As another comment or mentioned, the built-in Python server is nice.

I would also like to give a shout-out to Caddy if you need a more configurable web server. After dealing with complex config in Apache and nginx, Caddy is a real treat to use.
Sure, there are Constitutional bounds to the rules Congress can set for how members are chosen, but it is not true that any change to how members are chosen requires a Constitutional Amendment.

At-large districts used to be something states could, and did, choose to use for electing representatives to Congress (an effective way of giving the statewide majority full control of the Congressional delegation.) Now it's not. Was there a Constitutional Amendment? Nope. Just an Act of Congress.
Re/ knowing older protocols, I recently took a few weeks to read _Networking for System Administrators_ and take+review copious Anki card notes. It's incredible just how much more confident I feel around understanding networking at a high level, including both DNS and all the stuff underneath it, like `ethtool` and Ethernet frames and stuff.

I suppose this isn't surprising, since knowing things "from the ground up" is why I went for electrical engineering instead of CS in college.
Assuming new cryptocurrencies aren't scams is a really tired take. Please provide some substance as to why you think this is a good project instead of just defending it without justification.
Long Term Ownership and Maintenance of an Event-Driven System
In the third video of this series they show an improved version where before throwing the knife one can choose the number of rotations, down to the minimum value of 1/2 of a rotation.
The over-simplified answer is "The fed started upping interest rates, after having held them ridiculously low for about a decade."

There's arguably more to it than that, but when people talk about "cheap money" they mostly mean "low interest rates". If you just Google terms like "end of cheap money" you'll find lots of discussion on all of this.

Some examples:

https://www.ft.com/content/6d312b6c-9f74-4816-ad7e-7e797c5e0...

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2022-11-30/what-s...

https://fortune.com/2022/12/28/investing-outlook-2023-fed-in...

https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/end-cheap-money-reveal...

and so on.
Interesting…

I’ll bet it’s possible, just not organizationally possible…

I’ll bet there are $80k Agilent / R&S rigs that can wire to a tower and do the entire cellular stack except for the PHY…

Would love to see pictures of such a connection in practice.
IMO this whole concept of "hallucinations" is a made up buzzword (in the context of AI) to distract from the fact that the companies who are writing/training these models know full well that what they spit out is just as likely bullshit as it is "correct".

Saying "we have no idea if it's going to spit out something accurate" doesn't sell.

"oh it's hallucinating, how cute" is an easier sell.
Well, DNA is commonly known to go very long and is one of the nanowire polyners we know how to flawlessly grow relatively cheaply. So it's origami (or rather, beaded weave) of an extremely long string.

What makes this glass containing structure so much better than normal protein histones?
Maybe DNA-protein nanoweave is the material of the future, like kevlar was.
Grafting Tailscale onto the Pi
Depending on the relevant GC period (whether 3 or 5 years), an applicant for naturalization must provide copies of his or her federal tax returns or tax returns transcripts for this period.
Tor doesn’t deliver any of those things. It’s a tool developed for spies that is mostly used to facilitate grifts and move contraband.

I’m not worried about clowns in white vans or terrorists. If you want protection from the government, you need to advocate for protection under the law. Journalists, NGO workers, etc have to figure out how to manage risk and may need to self-censor to avoid those risks. Tor won’t protect you if you irritate MBS.
This reads like the author has just taken their first intro to political philosophy class.
No k8s has not delivered that. It's built an orchestration layer on top of iSCSI, NVMeOF or whatever "remote disk" tech the kernel has implemented and abstracted that from devs which was the whole point of k8s.
A constraint for determining project feasibility is the lead time on studies which determine the cost of interconnections. To complete the study the PSS/E or PSLF software is required and the model of the utility’s system, so typically only the utility can complete the study since the models are not available externally and they only have so many people permanently employed performing studies.

The study might show that the upgrades required to inject power at a project location and maintain system stability and reliability are too costly and the project can’t proceed as proposed.

The studies are usually performed in the order that the requests are received.

Project proponents are often unaware of where on the grid the most cost effective interconnections are for a given project size.

The feedback loop between proponents and utility could be tightened up if the utility would publish a map showing available capacity or cost to upgrade vs new capacity for different locations on the grid.

That is one way the utility could meet the demand to perform the studies faster with the same number of quants.
He got a head start through acess to better education, access to equipment others wouldn't have had (just like Gates), his fathers social snd business connections, and more, as a direct result of his father's wealth and connections. This lead to immediately improved outcomes compared to his "competitors".

Seriously, this was actually already answered.

Quit sealioning.
Amazon's Risky Bet
> As it is now, it takes an average of five years for a new energy project to connect to the grid.

Wow, that's just mind-boggling.
The BBC tweet you linked says

"Table below shows the forecast air temperatures (1.2m above ground)"

But a quick google search for "temperature measurement height" produces the answer

"Air temperature is officially measured in the shade at a height of 2 meters, or about 6 feet, above ground."

I'm not sure what a measurement at 1.2 metres actually means. This (the inflation of temperatures produced by measurements closer to the ground than usual) was also pointed out in the Italian press by scientists who cannot be suspected of climate denialism.
Ground truth, inviolate: the OS owns the trust relationship with the user. The OS may allow the extension of that trust relationship (MDM, custom TLS roots, etc.) but that's informing the OS's own authorization, it's not supplanting it. It follows, then, Apple is the arbiter of consent on an iOS device because they own the OS (the user has chosen to, by buying an iOS device, grant the authorizee's part of the trust relationship).

Apple does not have a trusted relationship with you, the software developer. And Apple doesn't know about a trust relationship between the user and the software developer until the OS sees confirmation from the user.

It then follows that consent must be given at or inside the security boundary to be provable; the web page you refer to is outside of it. You are asking to move from a less trusted environment (a web browser, generally watched like a hawk) to a more trusted environment (an application, with additional implicit permissions and the explicit ability to ask for others). That isn't a decision you are allowed to make and it isn't something that, for all Apple knows, you confused-deputy'd your way around a user's affirmatively consenting to.

It's turtles all the way down. You have to acquire consent at a trustable level. That means the OS or, if the OS isn't sure, the user themselves, through an OS-verifiable method. Sorry that your third-party vendor doesn't count, but it shouldn't. "Just trust me" isn't security.

"But nobody cares" might be next up, so let's settle that now: nobody cares because they pay Apple to care for them.
Nuclear too cheap to meter is too cheap to sustain, ironically. In our current system too much abundance is bad thing.
An awesome and courageous organization gives an award to an awesome and courageous person. Congrats Alexandra!
> There’s no reason to care about online privacy

> [I just said] I was a privacy researcher.

Is "privacy researcher" some kind of euphemism here?

> There’s no money in being a creep about it, so people mind their own business.

> The data collection is all about money.

I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say.
I know this isn't in the same spirit as the project above, but at least in Spain it's available on Netflix.

I didn't remember it having so much filler though.
Now we just have to apply that concept to the watering-down which occurs when they try to take white-papers and disseminate them to the public through news articles and etc.

It is important for the public to learn - and they will need assistance to understand findings that are outside of their usual realm of knowledge/experience. Unfortunately, the resources for this are shaky, profit-motivated, and arbitrary.
My guess is that t1 = t2 seems cheap but is actually expensive, so you might accidentally write very slow queries if it were built into the language.