skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As a hiring manager, I would say that the job market is still pretty strong for any engineer who can do fizzbuzz on the spot.

However, its now much tougher in the tech-adjacent fields such as graphic design, copywriting, and project management. Not so many openings, many applicants. Even if you get the job, pay and prospects are not great.
It's more like they are trying to bring the nose-based workflow to 2D art.

It's already very common in 3D and VFX.
Yes, yes, yes and yes.

Who would use a distro with a lesser set of CLI tools? Who would use a distro without a supported shell? Canonical is now using their position to push Snaps, for example. And it's usually financed through enterprise (server) software support contracts, instead of direct payments for the product.
kinda agree, AFAIK full stack term became mainstream when front and back got closer due to ajax, maybe it was already used in the days of LAMP which was a `whole stack` too
Shoes are a result of human production too.
> Nineteen-Sixties

I can only assume the decade is written like this to comply with the publication's style guide. It's awful.
Comgrats on the launch!

There's also Svix Play which we built that's simpler than this list and does what you're after: https://www.svix.com/play/
> That's pretty alarming and should count for something, no?

No. What's truly alarming to me is this notion that people have that they own and control "their" image and likeness. They don't.

Rich celebrities with lawyers get to extract rent from corporations for use of "their" likeness but there's pretty much nothing normal people can do against other people with a computer. At the end of the day it's just data that can be freely manipulated and like all privacy issues the only possible defense is to prevent that data from coming into existence in the first place. It's not even a new problem, even before stable diffusion you could easily find on the internet people photoshopping other people naked for kicks.

Which is why I don't have any sympathy at all for public figures, especially the ones who deliberately publish that data and profit off of the attention they receive whether emotionally or financially through advertising. They asked for the attention and they got it. Now they want government tyranny to control what kinds of attention they get? I don't accept that.
Linux has FUSE, which is a framework to develop user-level filesystems. Mounting S3 buckets is a very good use case. Sshfs and httpfs are more or less similar in this regard.
Travel is a right, sure.

Walking is a right, sure.

Driving a car is a reasonable parallel to pulling a carriage with a horse, sure.

Driving or carriages are akin to walking? No.

Everybody might have the right to walk that no one can take away from them, but everybody doesn't automatically have the right to a horse and the land required to support and feed that horse, to travel through a city with a horse on a daily basis without having to contribute back to the very real piles of horse shit a day in the hundred of tonnes that needs to be cleaned away, etc.

Some means of travel have wider social consequences, costs to the commons, that need to be addressed.

EDIT: Original versin of AnthonyMouse comment specifically mentioned a right to a horse and carriage.

The analogy would then be that driving is the modern equivalent of walking or drawing a carriage with a horse, even if cars didn't exist 200 years ago. For this to be relevant you would then have to be making the case that driving is only a privilege and not a right because walking is only a privilege and not a right. Which you're not actually claiming, are you?
You might like this: https://www.amazon.co.uk/McMindfulness-Ronald-Purser/dp/1912...
It is an answer, even if you don't like it.

You didn't ask for "evidence for my worlds".
> now having been on the other side it is very apparent when someone hasn't prepared and practiced interviewing

I noticed this when interviewing candidates and although it's nice to have someone with their interview skills together, you run the risk of hiring "the master of interviews".
Windows 10 1607 was released 7 years ago.
I think category 6 is presently mooted, but category 17? That sounds like a major sunspot - could there be so violent a storm on Earth?
Ask HN: What Microsoft really got from the OpenAI deal?
I've been since January trying to figure out what is the stake that it owns on OpenAI, and what was the real deal.

I just saw some media outlets saying it will be 49%, but nothing confirmed from Microsoft.

Can somebody enlighten me? Thank you.
Nim Days Book
> TypeScript ensures this code will be totally typesafe at runtime:

That's cool. I think QML is going in that direction.

"In addition, Qt 5.14 introduced the possibility to provide type information in function signatures, similar to how it is done in TypeScript:"[1]
`function add(a: int, b: int) : int { return a + b }`

> I'm still a bit skeptical about all that QMLScript getting compiled to native code

"Additionally, in Qt 6.3, there will be another compiler: The QML type compiler, or qmltc. With the QML type compiler, you will be able to compile your object structure to C++. Each QML component becomes a C++ class this way. Instantiating those classes from C++ will be much faster than the usual detour through QQmlComponent. qmltc, like qmlsc, is built on the availability of complete type information at compile time. In contrast to qmlsc, though, qmltc has no graceful fallback in case the type information is lacking. In order to use qmltc, you will have to provide all the information it requires. qmltc will be available with all versions of Qt." [1]

I read your entire comment. It takes a lot of effort to respond here. You make some interesting points. I do think each should find the right tool for his job. I found QML very appealing. And I think it keeps improving and I hope they integrate some of the cool security features of typed languages etc. I might not be the best person to respond technically to your arguments, tho. In any case, I'd love to keep in touch. I saw you on Twitter so that's cool. I'm also (more available) on Discord. My username is "rubymamis" so feel free to send a DM (:

[1] https://www.qt.io/blog/the-new-qtquick-compiler-technology
Interesting. Literally every job I’ve gotten was either through a recruiter or cold outreach.
Sounds like you were working at a terrible organisation, not that there is anything wrong with running a platform team. Teams with stressful deadlines, having to involve VIPs or architects at the org to make decisions rather than giving teams autonomy to make their own decisions.

Not sure I'd like to use a platform with a code base that has the whole organisation contributing to it. Sounds like a design-by-committee dumpster fire. Teams need ownership of their product to perform effectively. You can claim that this is collective ownership of the platform, but in reality no one will feel any responsibility for the platform when things don't work or don't align entirely with the particular thing they are currently working on.

And have you ever looked at the source code for most open source software? It's an absolute mess that requires the collective effort of large numbers of people to keep it going. It works, but it's not exactly a good or effective model for internal software.
I heard about it from HN also!

They have extensions for other browsers too:
https://snowflake.torproject.org/
> 2. They indirectly stop you being put forward by other recruiters when you say "oh another recruiter has put me forward" (which they haven't, but you have a verbal contract with).

They usually send you a confirmation email to say that you're their bitch now but I reply to the confirmation email saying that if I hear nothing for 7 days, then I can go with another recruitment firm.
Adapting isn't the issue though? It just feels much nicer to play on my 144Hz monitor than it does on my 60Hz monitor. This is first-world problems territory at most. It's not just gaming either. Doing anything on my 144Hz feels so much nicer.
>Don't you think it feels incredibly degrading and violating to have your face stitched into porn in a way that's supposed to be as realistic as possible? Without your consent?

Not really.

> And you know people are jerking off to it.

Why would I care what you're jerking off to? Maybe it's thoughts of me. Maybe it's photoshopped pictures of me. Maybe it's a deepfake video of me. But unless you phone me up in the middle of the night to tell me about it (i.e. harassment), I couldn't care less.

"Ah but what if someone emailed your grandma with a video of you having sex with ten guys" - well yeah, that would be bad but it would be bad if they emailed my grandma with a poem about the same. The harm there would be the intent to harass not some psychic damage caused by you creating images.

>A couple of popular streamers who have had that happened to them have reported feeling similar feelings of shame and violation to the way they felt when they experienced actual sexual assault. That's pretty alarming and should count for something, no?

It's bad that they had those feelings, yes. But feeling shame for what someone else does with your image is clearly irrational. Understandable maybe but I'm not sure we should making public policy on whether someone feels icky about something.
Classic arrogant contrarian "let me tell you".. kind of post. Ah human nature.
The Internet really isn't that serious to me
Looks like Stripe's transformation into Paypal is nearly there.

We'll need a Stripe replacement soon.
I'm pretty sure the GP's point was that the US shouldn't have .gov/.mil etc, every country essentially has a form of government and military — And besides .gov.us would be more explicit.
Allie Weiner, Manager of Account Management (Mid-Market)
I recognise the friction points very well. It's very frustrating and limits product team velocity. That said, in my experience this is mainly due to a misinterpretation and mis-implementation of platform teams. Too often, platform teams are forced upon product teams. This misses an essential element of a platform, optionality. A platform should be a jumping board, that people can choose to accelerate development. When a platform is made mandatory it misses essential feedback mechanisms, such as rate of adoption, for it to steer in the right direction. While the rate of adoption is still often seen as a metric for a platform team's success, the mandate to enforce the platform onto product teams is fundamentally corrupting. In addition, the tools to truly accelerate development are not the same as time progresses. Without optionality, there is never the incentive to sunset anything the platform provides. Deviations of technology/pattern/solution use are often seen as negative aspects of the product team's performance, but rarely reflect back on the platform team's output.

TLDR; platform teams without product team's freedom to deviate (optionality) is corrupt and can destroy a large chunk of engineering velocity.
I really wanted to like Inkscape, though I found it very frustrating to use, the UI was clunky and felt really unpolished.

Affinity Designer on the other hand is really nice to use, and didn't do a bunch of weird stuff exporting SVG files.
I went to one with my family twice. That part was nice, and the service was good too. But I am always in awe of just how sugary and caloric and big meals in the US in general are (of course not CCF-specific) so that part detracts a bit from the experience.
This being an economics paper, the title alludes to a very famous paper by Akerlof that everyone has read called The Market for Lemons, ostensibly about used cars but illuminating a broad principle of how markets can malfunction.
thanks .. we are thinking of using cypress.io .. how would you rate it ?
Just spray some grafitti on them. Turn them into those country balls on reddit or something else.
I don't think you read the article thoroughly. They note more people saw them. Also the headline is accurate, it is why the account was banned and the designation is explained in the article.

I'm sick of internet nihilists muddying the water and making useless noise.
This and…

Use your new free time by not applying to…

Work on a project that interests you and share it online

Exercise both physically and fiscally

Spend time with people you care about and also care about you

And keep working on projects and sharing them, maybe even with hn

The comments on here are legion of individuals who post some project and have to then fight away recruiters…
> How could the mechanics of a forum be set up to achieve this?

I’ve seen the best results with niche email lists that actively moderate the discussion quality. But the results are mixed and I eventually decided that it’s a lost cause. People who don’t bring anything to the table tend to have more time on their hands to post nonsense.
The Cheesecake Factory has 2.5% food waste [0] compared to 4 - 10% in the rest of the industry [1].

[0] https://aviyer2010.com/2012/09/05/the-cheesecake-factory-and...
[1] https://www.upkeep.com/learning/how-to-calculate-restaurant-...
Might be worth adding a paragraph about what VyOS is, maybe not for the target audience but certainly for HN.

https://vyos.io/

The VyOS website says:

> Democratizing how we access networks through a universal Router and Open source software.

> Our vision at VyOS is to dramatically change how we access networks so that we can all build the solutions we always dreamed of, without restrictions, limitations, or prohibitive costs.

But I'm still kind of none the wiser. Does this thing use Linux or something else?
Artificial intelligence is powering politics
> a responsibility to improve the world for humanity

> he instead chooses to do what he does

That just depends on your view of what is and isn't an improvement to the world and we arrive back at partisan politics.
It sounds insane, but I agree with him, it's absolutely perceptible.
In Austria you are forced to name a minimum salary. Many companies decide to publish the lowest collective agreement salaries they can get away with even for positions where they will pay much more, for reasons that are beyond me. A low salary in a job posting has little meaning, a high salary in a job posting is a very good signal.
Ohh. Just saw this. If you're still interested mail me. :)
I remember playing that game in CGA (and speaker) back in the day. Fond memories :)
Nowadays in the movie version, it turns out they are both clones, and 3 other sisters have just come out of the woodwork and one of them keeps killing people...
If you don't mind, could you tell me how I should go about finding a recruiter directly on LinkedIn? I've been out of the market for three years now (had to take care of sick family) and it's extra brutal; I've been contacted by a few recruiters but I'd really like to speed up the process of networking with them if possible. Thank you. (I'm in the Inland Empire in Southern California).
Thank you for sharing! This is awesome :)
You're right. But, we should also do things that matter. This wouldn't. Right now, our horizon is literally 5 years. Anything that doesn't help in the next 5 years needs to get in line, because we've got 50 years of inaction to make up for.

OTOH, I am also not sure what we as a species can do in the next 5 years that actually will matter.
this looks like a default message that the bot sends when the bot is not able to understand the message. May be it's hoping that the user will rephrase their message.
The thing is, South Park generally hits both sides equally. There was a great bit (not in that episode) where Kyle's dad is explaining the Gods/clods economic dichotomy why he has a good, well-paying job (lawyer) because he has a slightly higher intellect so he was able to go to college and how they still needs clods to do the lower-status work. All of this is to say, everybody falls into their place in a "functioning America" or something to that effect and everything is just as well because of it /s
Wow this is at the level of Homer Simpson "Cereal with Milk catching fire"

But yeah, mathematically possible (in AWS scale, but still) so of course it will happen once in a lifetime.
The reviews on goodreads need to be moderated, some comments have nothing to do with a book review
> How does this logic cope with someone who puts intense levels of effort into developing interview skills, but not the depth of development or design skills to be a continued success post hire?

I expect it resolves just fine. The intense effort that you acknowledge is precisely what it takes to move forward in this field.
Until a moment ago, I didn't even know what sex the gorilla was, but can see it was female.

So many different angles to this, Identify crisis in animals, seen through out the animal kingdom, some even seen in humans, I see the zoo was in san francisco, so air pollution could have been a factor, were hair samples taken to measure the chemical content, like manganese when thinking of Methylcyclopentadienyl Manganese Tricarbonyl in gas guzzling US vehicles, due to where manganese can accumulate in the body and where else it can be distributed. Thats something that radioactive isotopes show all the time.

Like I said so many different angles with this, what angle does science or law want to fixate on, in order to win an argument?
Launching Google was a low stakes endeavour. Nobody was willing to put as much on the line as Musk did with SpaceX and Tesla. It's likely all of it would have happened at some point, but certainly not as quickly and effectively as it has thanks to Musk.
Yes - it's a Debian Linux based router distro that is at least partially modelled after Juniper's configuration style.

edit: used to be a maintainer for a short while :)
Exceptions and linear types are difficult to combine. Implicit destruction is fine though, provided destruction can't fail.
Automated meeting minutes generator with Whisper and GPT-4
> User counters 13000 word meta study by simply stating the opposite without giving any arguments, sources or studies.

I am giving my opinion on a random forum, not writing a study about mindfulness. I didn't even say anything controversial, a glance at the wikipedia page would list a bunch of criticism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfulness#Concerns_and_criti...

> Is there a forum like Hacker News, but with no "talking out of your ass"?
> How could the mechanics of a forum be set up to achieve this?

For example, you could try not to be an asshole and not to "talk out of your ass". Be a change you want to see.

Btw, in your case, a mindfulness practice could actually help. Instead of pretending to be an angry internet gestapo, you can try some basic breathing practices for a few minutes.
He gave details but you provided no rebuttal of his rebuttal. I would agree with him in the sense that just neutral observation often fixes the problem, but often can be a form of spiritually bypassing your problems. For example, if we're anxious from a lack of income, but all we do is neutrally observe, that's not solving the root problem.
To their credit, this may be the only Rust project that does not say "blazing fast" on the home page.
Yes, but in my limited experience it's been former managers who are looking to see if they can re-hire you (at either your previous job or wherever they moved onto themselves).
Not necesarly the only way as someone who often interviews candidates, if I'm getting bombarded by spam applications, the least you can do for me to take your CV seriously is a cover letter related to the job posting / company.

I don't understand any candidate who sends out a letter without researching the company for 30 minutes and taking another 10 to write a thoughtful cover letter. if you're not willing to put that effort into your potential future position, it's not even worth opening the CV from my side.
I am making a social app and JWT has some security concerns
quote from https://www.akamai.com/blog/security-research/owasp-authenti...:
Six threats to JWTs

1)Allowing the server to use a token without validation.
2)Using the same private key for different applications.
3)Using a weak signing algorithm.
4)Choosing a short and/or low-entropy private key.
5)Keeping sensitive data in a JWT's payload.
6)Confusing the keys.

I encourage the storing of the token so you can cross check the information with a "local authentic copy". That way issues 1 and 6 of JWT are fixed and issue 5 since you dont actually store "information" in the key EVEN if someone steals your key he can not steal sensitive data from it. Now i put information in quotes because you do put something, ike the username to make the key unique to to user, but username was already "public information" so no "user personal data" leakage in case of a disaster.

Thanks for your feedback : )

To address issues 2,3 and 4
2) You may use the "same key" but you have the option to change it whenever you want
3/4) Fernet is a VERY strong encryption algorythm
> I don't think it's that amazing - if you were working on it at the same time you probably would have come around to it.

Then why there were so many 'top tier' scrolling platformers at the time that ran so choppy? While I don't think it's a hard requirement for a fun game, the level of smoothness Keen had (especially on low-end hardware like a <10MHz machine) was eye-opening at the time.
The Mythic Computer Co. constructs heirloom computers by hand
Grover's Algorithm gets you effectively a square root difficulty improvement. So, AES 256 is "only" as strong as a 128-bit symmetric encryption if you have equivalently cheap quantum computers.

Even ignoring that we don't currently have any usable quantum computers and there's no reason to believe they would be affordable, let alone cheap, this mean AES-256 is fine.
In most languages the type language is a different language to the executable language. In cases where this is so, I prefer the type declaration to be on a separate line to the executable definition rather than having them intermixed. I think Haskell has the right approach here.
Essays: https://www.mythic.computer/essays/
> Now tell me how artists were not stealing from each other.

Key words being "from each other". AI only takes, it doesn't give anything back, it doesn't inspire. Their ultimate goal is to absorb the entire human history of art and then displace millions of people who received nothing from this transaction they were forced into, just so that some billionaire can afford another yacht.

I have no problems with AI models, but if you want to use art, writing, code, etc. for training, you should restrict your use to public domain works, ask for consent, or commission it. Obviously that would cost a lot of money so big tech companies are once again looking for a free ride.