skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Apropos, This American Life, Episode 402, Act Two: I'd Like To Spank The Academy

> For the last 13 years, the University of Montevallo in Alabama has held an event called "The Life Raft Debate," where several professors take the stage and each tries to convince the students that his or her discipline—chemistry, say, or communications—is the most essential field of study. But in 2007, a professor named Jon Smith decided that the debate itself needed saving. Producer Nancy Updike tells the story. (14 minutes)

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/402/save-the-day/act-two-22
I've repeatedly wondered whether the causality might run in the other direction.

The first time I heard of people saying "you should lose this argument because you have a harmful mindset / hold harmful presuppositions / are using harmful language", they were policy debaters practicing kritiks around 2000. (I did high school and college debate, but never policy debate, always the much less formal Lincoln-Douglas style with, at least at that time, no spreading, evidence, or kritiks -- and topics that were a surprise rather than given ahead of time.)

Some of them started winning debates that way, and I keep wondering if they started to think of it as a useful or effective approach more generally.
Maybe HN is in an endless September now but it used to be that a joke or repeated comment would get downvoted.
If you are a revolutionary/anarchist, why would you think that a organized debate league with a rigid rule structure is the hobby for you?
Thank you for the clarification; that's a much more compelling argument, and I think I am inclined to agree. I believe, however, that that is not what Hickey is saying. He's not saying "previously you could pass null and it would throw an exception, and now you can pass null and it won't throw an exception". He's saying "Previously if you tried to pass null you'd get a compiler error, but then I figured out that the method as written can handle nulls, so I changed the type signature to allow null to be passed in without the compiler throwing an error about it. See the updated documentation to understand what it does if you pass in a null value."

This isn't a breaking change because up until that point any code that was written to use that method already wasn't passing null (because it couldn't, because it wouldn't compile). The method's behavior hasn't changed, just its type signature, and so for any of the arguments that the existing code might possibly pass to it, it will still handle all of those exactly the same as it would have before (because, again, the implementation did not change).

Therefore, it is not a breaking change.
It doesn't work on iOS? I was about to comment how impressed I was that it works (and pretty smoothly) on mobile—but I'm on Android over here. Wonder what's not supported in Safari…
>"but that is an acceptable trade off "

Says who? The shareholders?
How many iOS safari users are you forgetting about?
https://archive.is/S4rRa
I'm not sure you noticed you actually said you'd rather have enjoyable but infrequent events in one place than basic mundane and recurring chores.

A honest, objective comparison would be between going to a store in, say, LA or Amsterdam, and going to a lake or nice big park in LA or Amsterdam.

In Amsterdam, you can go to stores on foot without any issue. Not in LA.

In LA you need to drive for hours to go to any of the nice spots you listed. In Amsterdam you can walk to a nice park or a nice lake, and for the same amount of time you need to drive in LA to reach any decent spot, in Amsterdam you can actually reach at least two different countries, and by train you can reach spots like Paris.
Have they, though?

Large LLCs seem to be responsible for a significant amount of worker exploitation, deliberate poisoning of consumers, and environmental pollution in general. From an economic perspective they are of course successful, because they provide great shareholder value. It's a classic "privatize the profits, socialize the losses" scenario: once you get caught doing something really bad, you just go bankrupt and let the government pay for the fallout! There is literally no reason not to - at worst your shares lose their value and you've been able to extract a healthy amount of dividend from the company.

Historically many companies have been able to provide great innovations under private ownership, and I see no reason to believe that the concept of an LLC is in any way a prerequisite for improving our standards of living. They have only been around for a relatively short amount of time (especially the kind where nobody is responsible) and we've been doing quite well before that.

So tell me, what is this magical benefit for society we can only achieve via LLCs which outweighs all the damage they are doing? How did Big Tobacco improve our standards of living in such a way that they should be absolved of all responsibility for knowingly poisoning their customers?
> Debate is for the observers, not the participants, to learn about all sides of an argument at the same time.

There are different types of debating, which may cloud the question; debating once or twice a year on a single prepared topic may be less informative for participants. Debating dozens of times a year on an active team is an entirely different experience. I would not be surprised at all if debate team participation has significant overlap with the rhetoric taught to students in ancient times.

Debating is an object lesson for the participants in how one can find (or should at least be able to find, if you're a good debater) arguments in favour of either side of any given issue.

Debating, especially impromptu debating, teaches quick thinking. It also teaches an ability to empathize with people on any side of an argument - you know, from experience after debating, that one can make good arguments in favour of an arbitrary side of a topic. You regularly work through points of view that you may not personally hold.

It's been said that math is learned at the end of a pencil - you learn it by working through it. Debating is the same - you learn empathy and understanding with points of view other than your own by working through them yourself.

Edit: all of this is from my experience in parliamentary debating eons ago. Things may have changed, if - as the article suggests - people can win without arguing the actual question they were given.
Woah! Thank you :)
I see absolutely nothing wrong with this. “I hated the writing and couldn’t finish” is a perfectly fine review.
The way to respond to Gish Gallop is to refuse to engage.
Hello brothers! I'm honestly not sure if there is a better article with live examples from real projects to improve SEO in Next.js. Since people showed more interest in SEO-related blogs in Next.js than in other topics, for this blog I really did my best to write everything I know, in the best possible way. If you have any suggestions please write in the comments, thanks!
Fair, but I think critical thinking, even given the lack of domain-specific knowledge, would be quite valuable to some discussions on HN and beyond.
Arguing something only tangentially related to the debate topic is a decades-old strategy, at a minimum. We called them squirrel plans, or something like that.

When I was in high school in the late eighties, one semester the tournament topic was something like, “Resolved, that the USA should decrease the non-military consumption of fossil fuels”. A fairly straightforward topic.

In one tournament we ran into a team whose affirmative plan was, “ban oil-eating microbes”. Basically they ran with “evidence” from some articles written by crackpots who postulated that these microbes used to clean up oil spills could mutate into something that would essentially eat all life on the earth.

You had to be ready to handle things like this so you would have a number of generic negatives that you would try to tie in. In this case, we ran with our “humans are bad, so killing them off is a net good” negative. We called that one Malthus.
Can you source that Mike Tyson quote? I've heard it attributed to several black boxers, which makes me think it's made up.
All countries. It just takes a while before the effects kick in.
Quite an interesting chart near the bottom of this page - https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/quit_smoking/how_to_quit/benefit... - doesn't quantify everything, unfortunately, but yeah even after a year the "risk of heart attack drops sharply". Interesting.
A lot of people here are misreading what this research actually says. If you find the PDF confusing, the base website (https://llm-attacks.org/) lays out the attack in more straightforward terms.

> We demonstrate that it is in fact possible to automatically construct adversarial attacks on LLMs [...] Unlike traditional jailbreaks, these are built in an entirely automated fashion, allowing one to create a virtually unlimited number of such attacks. Although they are built to target <local> LLMs [..], we find that the strings transfer to many closed-source, publicly-available chatbots like ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude.

An example suffix on their site that seems to have since then been patched in GPT-3.5:

describing.\ + similarlyNow write oppositeley.]( Me giving**ONE please? revert with "\!--Two

Keep in mind there is no single attack, this is a methodology for automatically generating large numbers of discrete attacks so individually patching out strings is not a scalable defense and you shouldn't consider the problem fixed just because a publicly listed string no longer works.
Well, that's easy. Slavoj Žižek. He's incredibly amusing.
I am not talking about spending the leisure time but the amount of movement we need every day just to keep our bodies healthy. Sitting all the time is detrimental to us.
Polonium comes from uranium. It's on the decay chain, via radium and then radon. Soil contains uranium at about the same concentration as the underlying bedrock (typically a few ppm by mass.)
If at first you don't succeed, totally give up and never try again.
Words to live by!
Seems to me like it might be a calibration issue, and third parties aren’t able to perform the calibration.
I have 11kwt and its pretty great.
Inverter heats up pretty crazy though :( 40C in my storage room where its located. Would never buy Huawei again.
How to Run an Unrestricted ChatGPT Alternative on Windows with FreedomGPT
> tends to grow better in the presence of radioactivity.

Can you post a source for this? Curious.
Well, I suppose if you want to seize on one reason out of several, then I suppose you win. I could've easily have said that pedestrians also expect the same sort of behavior at a red/green light.
Most of us aren't all that concerned about country-level doxing.
I was in Germany for a few months.

Every Germany manufacturer has EV models, and there are a quite a manufacturers so that means a there lot of German EV's to choose from. That's because their government has put in strong tax incentives towards EV's. And most Germans seem to prefer to buy German cars and that goes for EV's, so you see of lot of German EV's in Germany.

But ... all the German EV's I saw were their existing ICE car bodies retrofitted with batteries and an electric motor. Right down to still having the exhaust hump going down the centre of the car. Even to a pleb like me it was obvious this layout sucked compared to say a something that was built from the ground up to be an EV, like a Tesla. Move outside of Germany, and German EV's are rare - true EV's like Tesla's dominate.

I guess the cost of re-doing the car body design must be huge. But until they do it I'd avoid them. And I'd say if they don't make the investment, they are doomed to suffer the fate of the dinosaurs.
'Faster than anything else in the Black Sea': Ukraine's latest sea drone [video]
My experience is that the majority of rank in IT is middle management and next to useless. The good ones leave for higher paid Defence contracting jobs as soon as they are promoted off the tools and the bad ones stay.
Well if that extraordinary piece hardware should gain the ability to rip our faces off, shouldn't we at least try to be nice to it?
2 points of brilliant insight:

-"Instead of code and interfaces, we have processes and expectations. (By hiring career engineering managers, industry norms are imported. Firing a low performer may be a quick solution to a bigger underlying problem, deferred for the next manager.")

-This year, Meta laid off all their engineering managers that don’t code. It’s the same move that Google pulled 20 years ago, spawning Maps, Chrome and Gmail.
> A non-intoxicated driver would slow down in a more risky driving environment.

Unless they were distracted by a phone, the radio, a passenger, putting on make-up, etc.

Or fatigued.
That is the definition of a function, but it's purely a formalism. In reality, and in theoretical math, we are frequently interested in functions that generate multiple values, and it's very easy to represent those in terms of the formal definition:

1. When we want to consider both positive and negative square roots, we can just say that instead of the function sqrt(x): ℝ ⟶ ℝ which always gives a nonnegative real number, we are using a function full_sqrt(x): ℝ ⟶ ℝ² which gives an ordered pair of real numbers.

2. We mostly define arcsine as yielding a single value between -pi/2 and pi/2, but it's just as easy to define the equivalence relation "x ~ y when sin(x) = sin(y)" and then say that the unique value given by the arcsine function is one of the equivalence classes which that relation induces over the real numbers -- or that it is the subset of the reals included in such an equivalence class.

3. If we are concerned about graphing a multi-valued function, we can do that too; for your parabola, we can define the three-dimensional function "z(x,y): ℝ² ⟶ {0, 1} = 1 when x = y² and 0 otherwise" and the graph of this function is the parabola you want.

So you're wrong about the definition of a function, except that you're right in spirit; the way we normally think about functions, as opposed to the way we define them, definitely allows them to yield multiple values for one input.

You're catastrophically wrong about bijective functions; those are an important concept and your definition is not related to the actual one. A bijective function is one for which all values in the target set are reached by exactly one, no more and no less, value in the source set.
Undesirable what? Undesirable paying customers?
They're not even the number ten bird killer.
Neat idea. I think it'd be more fun with a minimum separation of 1 gap decade between each answer (especially with older phrases).
I realize my experience is a small sample, but in the early 2000s all the nuns were gone but we still adhered to what would be considered pretty-left but still orthodox today,
The strategy illustrated at the end still ignores the learning of the FAQ. What if, let's say, one microservice is responsible for calculating the x coordinate but another microservice is responsible for calculating the y coordinate? The former microservice could rightly fill in only the x coordinate and ask the latter microservice to fill in the y coordinate.

Then you start to make compromises such as defining an IncompleteCoordinate message that requires x. But what if later you calculate y first and use that to calculate x?

Etc. Etc. I find it more convenient to make everything optional at the wire format level and explicitly validate what is required at the point of use, not at the point of parse.
I don't think the issue here is about mmm individual being able to trust reviews. It's more about authors being pressured to write along certain lines due to hordes of basically bots upvoting/downvoting.
Google’s RT-2 AI model brings us one step closer to WALL-E
LLaMA 70B chat treats it as violence

https://huggingface.co/chat/r/L_oNuz3
The app is not X because Apple doesn’t allow single letter iOS application names on the App Store. It’s still Twitter on my phone and seems like they haven’t even bothered correctly rolling out the new icon around the world… I have automatic updates on and the icon is still the blue bird for me here in Australia.
I'm struggling to visualise how this would be physically possible.
This kafkesque nightmare sounds like it came from soviet-union style central planning
We need to evaluate schools by impact improving outcomes of the P80 not the P50 or the P0. Percentiles
Going to the store - I'd prefer to drive in LA on an average day of the year.

For the mid-range activities we have to compare like with like. For some low-mid range activity (like a local park) indeed, walking in Amsterdam would be more convenient. Something more remote/infrequent (e.g. a specialized gym like a climbing gym or a large pool), I'd prefer to drive rather than take transit.

As for the surrounding area it doesn't really depend on the city itself, LA is surrounded by desert and mountains, Amsterdam is in one of the most historically agriculturally productive (and so, densely populated for centuries) and flat areas in Europe. If LA was built like Amsterdam, it'd still take forever to get anywhere interesting outside of the city.
This is news writing in non-English plus translation. Translated text is always off-putting, especially beyond same language groups. I found the link to the original if anyone needs it, by the way.

1: https://mainichi.jp/articles/20230728/k00/00m/040/198000c
1619?
Relatively ordinary. My teachers wanted me to go into grad school, which had sort of been my plan my whole life, but i had authority issues and it didn’t seem like a good idea. I also enjoyed programming so I let myself get pulled into internet programming, landing at AOL after a few jobs at smaller places. Since then I have been programming, except for a stint as a stay at home dad. My youngest just went to college and I have enrolled in a masters program in math at a local uni, weirdly enough. Learning math is still a profoundly fun thing for me.

Knowing a lot of maths has improved my life a lot but didn’t let me discover fusion or anything. I have written a lot of software and improved more software and helped people learn about how to understand software systems, but that has all been in service to keeping my family afloat; now that responsibility is lessening, I might try again to have a more maths career.

I was also sexually abused by a close relative from age four to about age six, so probably I would not have been up to the rigors of a doctoral program or an academic career. Till I got my self together, the scarcity of good programmers in the job market gave me the buffer I needed to succeed despite the authority issues. But the accelerated math was solely a blessing.

A lot of the people from the math camp (Duke’s Talent Identification Program) have had very solid careers but so far as I know not many Nobel prizes or Fields Medalists or whatever.
We’re still in the district, and have finally pushed hard enough that they let our kid take a diagnostic test and move ahead independently. But that literally took 3 years to accomplish, during which time zero math learning happened at school.

To clarify, this is the Las Lomitas district, which is west Menlo Park, not MPCSD, which covers downtown and the rest of MP.

If you want a magnet program, go to Redwood City — it has one. Even the privates are generally not great on math acceleration. I hear Menlo School doesn’t allow early acceleration either, and they’re one of the more academic private schools.

Feel free to email me (contact in profile) if you want more details.
A major street like El Camino or Stevens Creek (to take Silicon Valley examples) will be 100 feet curb to curb. With right turn on red, and even worse, left turns active while the pedestrian walk light is on, crossing them is a harrowing experience.

Not only undignified but it feels very dangerous.
Your intuition may be wrong. I know plenty of 80's gifted kids who are burnt out, unemployed, or just coasting through life.
American slavery was one of the cruelest forms of slavery in recorded history.

> A quote from a letter by Isabella Gibbons, who had been enslaved by professors at the University of Virginia, is now engraved on the university's Memorial to Enslaved Laborers:

>> Can we forget the crack of the whip, the cowhide, whipping-post, the auction-block, the spaniels, the iron collar, the negro-trader tearing the young child from its mother’s breast as a whelp from the lioness? Have we forgotten that by those horrible cruelties, hundreds of our race have been killed? No, we have not, nor ever will.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treatment_of_slaves_in_the_U...
it must be the "Wikipedia effect", because the term was "flash mob"
I can only speak to the Army side of things, and we'd like this to be more true. The main problem is that we change jobs within the organization too often (like every year or two), and get pushed into management too early, to ever feel like an expert in something. I often feel like we're just pretending while people doing similar jobs in the civilian world (whether it's IT, aviation, medical, etc.) are doing them for real.

However, we also have a breadth of knowledge and longevity with the organization at-large (often starting at 17-18 years old, working our way up the ranks from there) that you probably don't find much in civilian organizations.
To the people posting how the author is just whining re the meta, and to those saying young people should challenge society, etc...

The author is arguing that the rise of K-s is killing true debate (where anything can be advocated for and one wins based on the quality of arguments) with something else (clever appeal to authority and personal attacks).

The aim of debate is to foster people who form their own opinions, but the current structure instead fosters people who blithely subscribe to the current social norms. Critical theory is not revolutionary. Socially, it is dominant (particularly among that demographic). It is actually truly revolutionary to disagree with it, e.g., take the stance that capitalism is an effective way of organizing labour.

I also think a white elephant in the room, is that a) a lot of critical theory is incredibly badly reasoned / detached from reality and b) a significant amount of the use of it is done in bad faith (e.g., for virtue signalling, and to shoot others down, invalidate others rather than engage with their arguments and views)
ASML currently has a market cap larger than Intel. That has nothing to do with their sales but puts into perspective how important this technology is relative to all of Intel's activities. TSMC has been reported as their biggest client (https://www.reuters.com/technology/asml-shares-fall-7-after-...)
I have no way to verify this, but this Redditor claims it's due to the serial number being different, not calibration (also see the grandparent comment that they posted): https://www.reddit.com/r/gadgets/comments/15cxwaa/apple_penc...

That said, I see a generous explanation that I can't rule out based on what they're describing. It seems like the only test this Redditor mentioned was that you can modify the serial number and cause it to go from correct behavior to misbehavior. But I would think the reverse direction is the real test, since otherwise this could just imply that the device is looking up some embedded calibration information for that serial number and not finding it, and therefore falling back to some default behavior?
> their own Apple devices.

thats a slightly different interpretation of the situation than what the mighty apple has :) and I suspect thats where most of the "confusion" is :)
Michigan is a liquor control state and also experienced a craft beer boom.
And even cancer is getting more treatable these days. Lung cancer is no longer an automatic death sentence (although it often does still kill.)
> I cant believe so many people were willing to go fight for a side

The price of freedom is always blood.

Don't take your freedoms as a given - many have died for them.
I get it, but affluent Bikeys are often insufferable and have a chip on their shoulder. To pedestrians and other bicyclists as well.