skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I see lots of comments saying this is a huge deal if true. Can I ask... well, why? What can we do/make with this?
Neither humor nor sarcasm advance interesting conversations on their own IMO.
I owned the bolt for 2 years before they bought it back from me - I still miss that car, it was the best car I’ve ever owned, so fun to drive. This news makes me really happy. I have a Ford Escape PHEV now and it’s been great and practical but nowhere near as fun to drive.
Perhaps the bottleneck of consumer demand
Why would they want to is my question. A single character change would break it.

Then you have database costs of storing all that data forever.

Moreso, it's only for openAI, I don't think it will be too long before other gpt4 level models are around and won't give two shits about catering to the AI identification police.
I think they take less risk in each hiring decision and because of that, can take on more risky / less proven candidates, ergo more risk acceptance in the hiring practices.
I think it was one of the Huawei watches.
Buying a new car in the USA that isn't NACS is osborning yourself. You are basically buying something that is significantly less value, just as if you bought a Beta VCR after it was clear that VHS would win.
Llama 2 Handbook for Developers
> You seem to be suggesting that statistical tools are useless at predicting trends in time-series data.

TA doesn't use "statistical tools" in any actually meaningful or predictive way. It's digital phrenology. Data-driven tea leaf reading. Programmatic palmistry. It deserves only scorn.
> Also, the judge agreed with J&J's idea, but found the filing to be premature.

And when he dismissed the filing, J&J changed some numbers and refiled the very same day. That obviously wasn't the message that they got out of the judge's ruling.
Science itself is not a scientific phenomenon. And that's OK.

The "scientific method" doesn't tell you what to study, or how to go about studying it. It's ultimately a matter of intuition about what is most likely to be productive. Your intuition is guided by your experience, but it rarely gives you a "this is what you must study next" pointer.

Funding is yet one more layer on top of that, since it has to balance expected financial returns to society with things that aren't ever expected to make money. Sometimes they do anyway, but that's not why we do them. We do them out of a sense of curiosity -- the same reason we make art.

I suspect that on balance our "just plain curiosity" work has paid for itself, but only because a tiny number of things (like quantum physics and number theory) have had insane returns. The vast majority will not, and you cannot tell which it will be.

Your phrase "political logic" has all kinds of negative connotations. But ultimately, politics is the process by people work together, and science is one aspect of people working together. That's messy; it's always messy. But it's also a real thing, and we cannot pretend it doesn't exist just because we can't write equations for it. Because if we set that standard, we'd have to abandon science itself.
> I think the customer has just changed. Consumers don't have money anymore. Businesses do.

The more inequality grows, the poorer average man becomes, the more this becomes true.

The more everything is enshittified, the harder it becomes to hold on to your money. It's a vicious circle.
Not with the prices alone. You need a context to use the prices for insight. They could literally be using the bids as a channel to communicate with each other because they are colluding, or as a performance for observers.
Curious Peoples: Daily 5-minute email to learn about art, history, and science
"If this ocean current is collapsing because of the current temperature anomaly, then it has happened."

It must be my reading comprehension that's off, but what has happened? What is "it", the ocean current collapsing?

The thing is, I don't see anywhere in the article that says it is collapsing.

"A new study published Tuesday in the journal Nature, found that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Current – of which the Gulf Stream is a part – could collapse around the middle of the century, or even as early as 2025."

Nowhere does it say it is in the process of collapse, at least that I could find.
take a look at "property tax"
In a world where everyone could buy the headset for $3.50 (thus there is no profit value to buying it and then re-selling it) then that percentage actually makes sense.
As I said: "unless what you are really up in arms about is a lack of a verified boot chain (which absolutely does not require remote attestation)". None of what you are talking about requires the attestation piece, only the verified boot chain (which supports codesign through to whatever layer you wish to protect).

The goal of remote attestation is only to be able to prove to a third party that your device is "secured", which does not benefit the user in any way other than awkward/indirect stuff like where in the Google proposal they argue that users have a "need" to prove to a website that they saw an ad (to get free content).
Doesn't rust suffer from the same, way too wide dependency web?

I feel like its an unfortunate consequence of having a good package manager which encourages proliferation of too many very small dependencies.
In its beginnings in the Dark Ages, medieval feudalism was pretty risky for everyone involved (though less risky than a complete societal collapse, but that is a low threshold for judgment). The nobility was expected to defend the land against invaders, who came in droves (Vikings, Magyars, Avars, Pechenegs etc.), and the incessant warfare came with a high risk of death. The peasants were mostly unarmed and any enemy attack would cause them great harm. Not even the clergy was sure to survive such events, as most of the invaders were pagan and would gladly kill priests.

We tend to judge the whole feudalism by its late stage, when pampered barons lived in huge estates and their only real risk was eating and drinking themselves to death, but that was also the stage which led to the system's demise.
Didn't Jobs and Woz intern at Atari or something...?
That we don't have hire and fire, meaning when you take a new job it comes with all kinds of regulations for the company - making them not wanting to change people so often.

Otherwise we surely can do this in europe as well, just with a little bit more friction.
I don't think that is true. The oceans around Cuba and Great Britain are not separate bodies of water. Volumetric expansion from heating gets flattened out across all connected bodies of water by gravity. You could see differences of geography in how much different lakes expand, though.
You're right in that the biosphere will probably be fine.

The question is whether humanity will continue to exist within it.
Enshittification rolls off the tongue perfectly.

But it's profane.
The idea that a private platform choosing not to amplify something they don't agree with, something that is clearly spelled out as their right in the first amendment, is "censorship" is absurd. If the local newspaper chooses not to run the classified ad you sent them, that's not censorship. If a big newspaper chooses not to publish the letter to the editor you sent them, that's not censorship. If FEDEX chooses not to ship the package you bring in, that's not censorship.

A business choosing not to do business with you, even in very specific and obtuse ways is not censorship. A private entity has no legal, ethical, or moral obligation to signal boost or publish anything they do not want to.
But the West Coast of North America is has milder winters than the East Coast, which has milder winters than the center. Shouldn't we expect London to end up with a similar climate as somewhere on the West Coast of Canada at the same latitude?
Your father's business is an exception, not the norm. Also, complaining about work is as human of an experience as death itself. That's why it's called work...
You don't get "genuine human intent" from the results of a coin flip. You don't even get to know it's a coin flip.
The naked celt A thing for the past
"new" circa 2019

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldcoin
The more apt analogy in that case might be "would you prefer I decapitate you, or forget to buy you a souvenir on my road trip," to better illustrate the difference in severity between Google's and Mozilla's actions.
> critical thinking skills, don't believe everything that you see, perform your own independent investigation of truth.

How would one possibly do that here?
Except the moderators are unpaid and they don't hurt much more than egos ?

Also Stack Overflow is not supposed to be a public service unlike police (is supposed to be), so the moderators are not accountable to you, only to the site guidelines (which you appeal to I guess)

Given the value it gives to society, it should be turned into a public service before some rich prick takes it over and turns into a cow to be milked or a self-aggrandizing venture.
I find both cromulent.
Some employers like to "adopt" candidates and brainwash them to them bond to the organisation. Of course that's just smoke and as time goes it takes a toll on mental health, way before things have become clear that your only family is your kin.
Internet-connected devices like tablets and smartphones tend to stop getting security updates after 5 years or so, making them basically useless.

That's frustrating but tolerable on a $300 device. But on a $30,000 car?
You can use vscode.dev to achieve something very similar:

- Run a vscode-server on your server: https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/vscode-server

- Connect (tunnel) to that code-server from vscode.dev using the Remote Development extension

One small reason to do it with two steps like that as opposed to a single "box" of coder/code-server is that you get Microsoft hosting the bandwidth multiple megabytes of files to download and a reliable single PWA to install for however many linux servers you want to remote develop on.
It does seem like HN has a lot of this surface-level stock market discussion. I wonder how much crossover there is here with r/wallstreetbets.

> Is there some investing discussion forum on the web with substance?

I've personally searched for something like this quite a bit in the past and I think ultimately it's the wrong question. It seems to me that a forum of people discussing stock market dynamics is always going to be doomed from the start. I think that's because the ideas actually worth discussing are too complex for even people with above average intelligence/capability.

TLDR: In my opinion, there's basically no where on the internet that you will find an "edge". All of the discussion is too shallow.

Assume that there are ultimately just two approaches you can take to financial trading: fundamental analysis & technical analysis.

Fundamental analysis is almost a solved problem. This is why stock picking is so hard and Warren Buffet types are so rare. I think this is because FA is infinitely more understandable than TA. Companies are evaluated based on their balance sheets/cash flows and compared to peers. It's not simple per se, but it's the sort of thing most people can grasp. It's well established that beating an index fund is difficult and that most stock pickers will not beat an index fund. Investing forums are full of people thinking they will be the exception but we know that most of them will underperform the benchmark.

Then there's technical analysis. Technical analysis of any substance requires a very strong mathematical background. The original post only mentions moving averages. That's essentially a pre-school level understanding of TA and I have strong doubts that a moving average strategy has ever been profitable. Basically any strategy that involves buying/selling based on a moving average or one of it's cousins is more shallow than astrology.

A more advanced practitioner of TA might get into pairs trading/statistical arbitrage. In developed markets (stocks/forex), an individual cannot succeed at this even if they understand how it works. It's just too competitive. Just a few years ago you could be profitable doing this in under-developed markets (.e.g crypto) but I'm not confident an individual could compete in crypto markets anymore.

Then there's even more advanced strategies that are employed at places like Renaissance Technologies. The people that work there tend to have advanced degrees in math/physics.
I think the point is that the server won't send the content if attestation fails

So the data isn't there at all - it's not just hidden away behind some JavaScript
a new bolt, with all the rebates available to CA residents, can cost as little as 12k for a single person earning less than 55k a year.

its hard to find a reliable used car for that price, let alone a new ev! i don't know what gm was thinking when they killed it.
No, it wasn't. The quote is from a month after the publication. The comment above said:

> I think Nate would say that the problem is that the paper literally said that such a scenario was "implausible" while the authors believed the opposite.

Please show me the evidence that the authors believe the opposite when they wrote the paper.
There's still lots of good stuff on Stack Overflow. For example, I just ran into this answer while looking for something else. What a great answer to a beginner level Rust question:

https://stackoverflow.com/a/75202816/91365
no, the comment you're replying was not being so narrow
Certainly not with hummers, they're being resold for well above MSRP if you can get your hands on one.
Your objection is valid, and I'm sure someone at these international payroll companies would be able to answer it much better than I can. Regardless, the benefits are much larger.
There is no substitute for infinite.
I watched Tim's Vermeer about 8 years ago and really enjoyed it. As an engineer, photographer, and someone who enjoys art museums I always find the intersection between the two interesting. Whether it is new paint or printing techniques, lenses, etc.
Admittedly, it's really fun to witness. It picks up any older conversation about the question, and gives you a pretty good answer. See it in action here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cynMPN9EVMo
My argument is that the sweet spot in the middle is incredibly common, and almost every sweet spot in the middle market is vastly underserved.

Texas triangle, Northeast Corridor (needs more speed and service frequency), Florida, California and Pacific Northwest, all need high speed service.

The problem of needing a car once you arrive locally is another correctable piece of policy failure, and that problem doesn’t stop a huge number of people from making a huge number of short hop flights in the United States.

In 2019, 44.5 million cars were rented in the US, so I think people very frequently jump on a medium to short distance flight and renting a car at their destination. Plus, we have ride sharing apps.
the answer is based only off of the transcript of the entire video.
Here is the #1 story on HN right now
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39810-w
Kind of an irrelevant point to make. We're setting new emissions records, so nothing so far has been productive.
Nice Heinlein reference. That particular concept stuck with me after reading SIASL
You can actually fire people with only two weeks notice during the first 6 months. I think the risk really is that nay inherent flaws in a highly paid employee are not detected early, and to fire them later is indeed very costly and complicated.
As a non-believer I wouldn't go as far as to say there's evidence for God, but I definitely agree with the spirit of your comment. Evidence against astrology is abundant, trivially easy to replicate, and the alleged narrative behind how astrology works is obviously incompatible with our knowledge of the Universe to the point that an educated middle schooler could explain why. None of that could be said about God.
Out of curiosity, what would you consider Finance 101?
This article makes no mention of and has me wondering if this model contemplates undersea hydrate and permafrost methane release and its effects on the climate slope? Or is it limited to what's already taken place and excluding potential accellerant events?
How would a layperson like myself judge what's in the IPCC report? The predictions are so dramatic that we have to act now and can't wait and see how it turns out. How is it different from this submission here?
Had those in heavy use during my work on a surface grinder[0], I can remember it had an ancient digital interface with 0.0001mm precision. We used the blocks to calibrate our measuring table[1] constantly.
Later in life I got to see the machines to measure the quality of photomasks[2] in the production line of modern CPUs, and I was just blown away when I heard about those tolerances.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_grinding

[1]: https://www.bafasan.com/en/images/kke/kke2.png

[2]: https://www.zeiss.com/semiconductor-manufacturing-technology...
discussion on actual Nature Communications article https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864319
Mass produce as many receivers you want and don't launch the ad-hoc satellite. How useful are the receivers?
Correct, although there is a legal conundrum. If you fire someone without cause, they can claim that you actually did have a cause, and it's one of the illegal causes. So, it's safer to compile evidence and fire someone for any legal cause -- of which "did not meet company needs" is generally safest.

Even safer is offering them a departure settlement of money and/or insurance coverage, in exchange for which they won't sue you.
> as opposed to your faith in hubristic science? science that has been bought and paid for time and time again for big money interests? are those just red herrings and whataboutism as opposed to 'learn from history or repeat it'? you're using corporate science to justify arrogant status quoian perspectives.

I expressly linked to experimental science dating to the 19th century. Not sure how that qualifies as 'corporate' or 'big money' science. There are other extant discussions of the subject that predate the influences you mention.

If you're claiming bias in the other figures (the increase in CO2 or the temperature numbers), then it should be possible to produce counterexamples and more formal rationales about why they make sense.

> > people who live along the coastline

> you mean the millionaires who are constantly pushing the global warming myth?

No. Just to pick a counterexample, Bangkok's elevation is 5 feet above sea level, and it's a city with ~10MM people. Lots more likelihood of catastrophic impact there than the US 'coastal elite' you seem to be alluding to.
They've explicitly said in interviews that they moved up the launch date because of the Twitter rate limiting fiasco, which is why it wasn't launched with all the features they had planned.
Forcing people into colonies (we might call them 'camps') is not oppression?
Paved rail tracks to water shuttles- dreaming up Boston transportation solutions
Based on where the MAU counts are, by your criteria the Fediverse will be safe from spam forever. Which falls into your last point, it's essentially a set of private forums, that interconnect. It's kind of ironic that the idea of the Fediverse apparently being beyond the neuron activation threshold of most people ends up being an effective filter.
The trash service is the one thing that as homeowner (and former renter) just baffles me. I totally understand the need and value if you are disabled or if you otherwise cannot. But seriously, every apartment I rented the trash dumpster was right there. Just grab the bag on my way out, toss it in
Good call. I assumed COBRA, which is not free but the company will sometimes cover the premia for laid-off employees.
Well, that would certainly be an effective way of instantly and permanently killing any public support for climate change related policies.
Did I miss something in the announcement that said it wouldn't be NACS compatible? GM has already announced adapters and vehicles from 2025 will support it natively.
Psychopathic Tendencies Help Some People Succeed in Business
If you live in the UK, income tax is 45%, and you still cannot rely on either of public education or public healthcare, at least if you want something of good quality.
I see, thank you. I wouldn't say this counts as censorship the sense we're talking about though right?
Only if it crushes our spirit. A hopeful counterpoint would be it incentives us to push back (of course easier said than done).
If you're asking if you can disprove the previous statement by finding a single example of a scientist who predicted wild rises in sea level that haven't happened, the answer is 'no'.

Most scientists can still have historically been overly conservative even if you can find a few that made over the top predictions. It should be perfectly obvious that the presence of a few outliers doesn't invalidate the median of the sample.
News Minimalist LLM vs News Maximalist LLM, garbage-in, garbage-out. ChatGPT giveth and taketh away. Ouroboros levels of disruption.
You should fight for higher salaries sometime (sic) <3

Additionally, a company putting this language in their termination agreement doesn't make it legal.
They're bringing the bolt format to their new ultium platform, meaning it'll reduce the cost and complexity of building this vehicle.
It'll be like alongside the equinox and blazer, same platform for a smaller shell.
High-risk high-reward. Lots of startups. Some succeed. Some go under.
A little too late GM - if you kept small car manufacturing/Sales in Korea/EU and had not sold it off (Opel/GM Korea) then it might have worked - nobody wants this car in the US.
> More likely is a bifurcation of the internet between West and BRICS, which is already partially in place

wym?
Installing Guix on a 10th gen ThinkPad X1 (2022)
If iron was worth naming an era after this will be.
Web Environment Integrity vs. Private Access Tokens: They're the Same Thing
If the purpose the proposal is trying to accomplish is itself highly objectionable, the only reasonable constructive feedback is "don't do it".
I moved from the UK to the US recently and I'm not sure it's worth my while.

Sure, I make more than 2x the salary, but the cost of living of a bit tech hub chips away most of it. Specially housing, which has increased dramatically since Covid. Even with my big fat tech salary, getting in the properly ladder seems to be years away.

Pay less taxes? sure, but then you have to pay for everything and then some, and everything is incredibly expensive. And we don't even have children yet. I can't imagine being able to afford childcare even with my current income.

I agree that I choose the worst time to move over. In the last year we experienced drop in stock prices combined with soaring inflation, which means that both my income went down, and my expenses went up. Also it's not like I can change employers and get a better deal. Even if the job market wasn't depressed, my visa (L1) doesn't allow me to change employers. Also the latest visa bulletin pushed the current date of my visa category back a couple of years, so Green Card seems like a somewhat distant dream.

All in, I'm not sure my quality of life in this country is better (and the UK itself is not doing great lately).
How to 20x the world's largest capital markets
FWIW I bought my Air M1 with only 8GB ram (this was 2y ago, I was in a rush and couldn't wait for the 16GB), and I do a lot of dev work there. I'd probably recommend 16GB, but for sure the 24GB option is a great machine.

For me the Air vs Pro really comes down to: do you need more than 1 external monitor? Do you need more than 2 USB-C ports? These are the only 2 "limitations" I see with the Air.
Oh I totally misunderstood and looked for a different "Sanders", thanks for sharing.