skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, technically he could say what he did if they pulled a vial of terrestrial pond scum or a goldfish out of the craft. She should have followed up, not with 'non-human', but with 'non-terrestrial'.
> Compression is something added after the fact, for transit and storage. The artist doesn't really have control over what sort of artifacts lossy compression is going to add, so I don't see how "not enough [compression] will reduce the impact the song has on the listener."

This conversation isn't about file compression, it's about dynamic range compression. Very different.

https://www.izotope.com/en/learn/what-is-audio-compression.h...
So these incredibly advanced beings also keep accidentally crash landing their spaceships once they get to earth?
Yeah, but it would be even better if there was no piracy and thus significantly more money to be made in the music business.
Pop Shell has solved the problem, please don't rethink too much.
That's bullshit, though. Pressure is not an excuse to fabricate data, and no one will defend that claim out loud. But what else does a rambly comment about how hard it is for researchers mean under a story about data fabrication?

Ed: to be clear, the one making the argument about publishing pressure in a sensible way is https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36881029
> Also porting the host code to Digital Unix made it ready for 64 bit in general.

IIRC, porting Linux to Alpha was credited for its 64-bit support, which made the AMD64 port much easier.
In the US it varies by state.

https://www.raynofilm.com/blog/automotive-window-tint-laws-b...
correct link, @dang please fix https://iamnotarobot.substack.com/p/why-i-am-starting-a-hard...
There is no system prompt in Llama, just as there isn't one pre-set for GPT 3.5/4 either.

There is a system prompt set for ChatGPT (just as you can set your own for GPT 3.5/4 if you're accessing the model directly), but even in that case there isn't much to jailbreak (the system prompt of ChatGPT just gives it the current date and such).

What people usually mean by jailbreaking these days is bypassing the tendences to avoid answering some questions, which is usually baked into these models during the final stages of the model tuning (e.g. RLHF).

For Llama, it is easiest to bypass most of it by either finetuning the chat version of the model to "remove" those "filters" (i.e. unlearn the well-behaving-too-much aspect), or to use the non-chat model and fine tune it (or just prompt it) yourself to be more chat-like. Alternatively you can try some non-tuning techniques, like generation constraining that someone else mentioned.

As for the hosted Llama you linked, maybe there is such a system prompt set there by whoever is hosting it, but that will be different from one host to another, so there cannot really be a "recipe" to follow.

EDIT: I forgot to mention that what you wrote actually is (or was) true for Bing Chat (aka Sydney back then). It came out before GPT4 was out, but was probably based on (early version maybe) of GPT4, and very heavily relied on the system prompt. But I assume they don't do that anymore, although I haven't been paying too much attention to Bing lately.
Oh yeah. Extremely narcissistic, controlling, 'better than you' type of person. Used to let me recover for a couple of weeks then stomped me again. That whole experience completely destroyed my daydreaming experience because in my imagination everything was rosy with unicorns, when it was toxic as hell in real life.
Conduction is just one type of heat transfer. There is also heat from radiation from sources such as the Sun.

Furthermore, an increased level of dissolved CO2 in the water is increasing its susceptibility to warming.

And then you have greenhouse gases, which are good at trapping in heat once it's entered the atmosphere. The ocean has the capacity to absorb this heat while it's trapped.
Thanks, just emailed the FTC. It was a bit cathartic and now I don't have to be angry about this for the rest of the day, I'd encourage everyone else to do the same.
That I'm not racist? What is so special about Europeans?
queries like these are best suited for window functions, although I am not sure Mysql supports it:

SELECT article, dealer, price FROM (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY article ORDER BY price DESC) as rnk
FROM shop s1
) sub
WHERE sub.rnk=1
ORDER BY article;

this query will be a single pass over table without loops/joins
I'm so confused. It seems like a joke (DankGPT and mentions of GPT5) but then it actually works. Is it just a tiny wrapper on top of langchain meant to poke fun at all the thin API-wrapper startups?
Ah, great catch. After posting my comment I came across this GitHub issue that touches on this point as well [0]

As always, I will be vigilant about checking licenses before adding data to OSM!

[0] https://github.com/alltheplaces/alltheplaces/issues/5133
What is special about starting a tech company in your 50s?

Isn't it easier than doing it in your 40s, 30s or 20s because with 50 you usually have more experience and more resources?
Farming has it's own costs and tradeoffs as well. If everyone started to eat only vegetables we quickly run out places to grow the types of crops we recommend.

The problem is overpopulation
I want to appreciate your comment, but I can't.

Can you please chisel it on stone tablets for me?

That will really help me appreciate it.
Eslint-Plugin-Unary-Minus
If you have a variable x whose type is not assignable to number | bigint, TypeScript doesn't flag -x as a type error, so you need an ESLint plugin to catch that.
It's a lot easier to see something and say you saw it, than to sneak physical evidence out of tightly-guarded facilities. Much less to reveal the crashed ufo they stole from the usgov and hid in their garage.
Not particularly unique to rust
> For the tech illiterate recommend Safari.

That's only applicable to Apple users, though.
Heat and Health Tracker
You could become an author, and at least get paid to dwell in those worlds
This link works: https://iamnotarobot.substack.com/p/why-i-am-starting-a-hard...
Guess you don't know, if it is fake, do you?
All we have are a few point examples, the total fakery is an unknown.

For decades it has been noted that Math/Physics, are very difficult to peer review, because there might only be a few people that can understand each sub-field. And, since they all work together, there have been cases of 'collusion' in the past.

Social Sciences are not all fake, they do have reproducibility percentages over 50%. You can argue that isn't high enough for your taste, but it is a valid number. Maybe Physicist is in the >90%. That doesn't mean All social science is faulty, or all physicist are pure. They are different fields with different challenges with different ability to do measurements. So, it is hard to re-produce.

Lately, AI papers aren't able to be re-produced. Where is the hate for them?

HN has tendency to pile on to social sciences based on just the same sensational headlines without much knowledge of the fields.
If you don't think they care what their customers want (and I agree), then you better go back to the original question of whether this is a "good thing" or not. Why are they actually collecting the data, if they don't care what you want?
Would that be worth reporting in Congress?

Believing so suggests there's a purpose to deliberately wasting everyone's time in such a hearing.

Or a simpler answer, Grusch is plain lying. But somehow, the stakes seem pretty high for him to do so here, unless he's confident of the whistleblower book money he could someday make off of this.
Average people are already losing flood insurance in Florida and fire insurance in California. Sooner or later they are going to feel the pinch.
In the US iTunes was available earlier, but people still liked piracy better.
I thought climate researchers have a fairly good understanding of the outcomes of high-altitude aerosols, since the reason sea level rise is trending slightly below the central estimate of IPCC 1990 is volcanic activity. See: negative forcing from aerosols https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGI_AR5_FigB...
I'm from Chicago, and I think Milwaukee is pretty cool. SummerFest was always so much better than Taste of Chicago... at least the acts that played there. I never even went, and I'm still confident that it's true.

One of my best friends lives in the suburbs along the lake, and it's similar to the north shore of Chicago. Nice neighborhood.
After spending some time customizing my .Xresources I was amazed on how much functionality it has [1].

The learning curve is a bit steep, but after taking a few minutes to understand it, there's a lot it can do in a simpler manner than more modern configuration and tooling.

1. https://stuff.mit.edu/afs/sipb/project/doc/ixresources/xres....
their demo isn't doing them any favors since it seems to stop at some random zoomlevel, eliding the kind of detail that I'd care about if I were evaluating that solution

digging into their GH repos surfaces https://protomaps.github.io/PMTiles/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fr2-pu... which is at least more detailed if not quite a GMaps killer
I had heard about this place, but sadly never visited. But after it shut down I was part of a startup that built a way for people to do this with audio only -- via phones and a web browser. We intentionally avoided video and images after studying the way strangers interacted across different formats. Remote Lounge looks fun, but for us it was more about long conversations where you didn't care about the other person's looks. I sometimes feel nostalgic for this type of thing.
Why are you worried about their analytics platform if your happily using their product today, which requires the use of 1Password cloud?

1Password don’t need to an analytics platform to steal your passwords. They could just straight up modify their client to send back your decrypted passwords to them. Analytics doesn’t make a jot of difference to the difficulty of doing that.
Is this using Draw Things, or another app? Did you have to quantize the model first?
Everyone speaks in hyperbole occasionally. One doesn’t need to rely on it but has its uses. It’s sometimes used to convey the strength of a belief. For instance, “I’m so mad at you I could kill you.”. It has other uses. That you appear to be unaware of how hyperbole is often times used and that it is a normal part of communication suggests that you are not really ready to participate in discussions.
Run dbt Core projects as Airflow DAGs
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36876504 since that thread broke the site guidelines and this one didn't.
Thoroughly upvoted and discussed "The first room-temperature ambient-pressure superconductor?" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624
has barely fallen to second page yet, but as the topic is of exceptional interest, and under development, and Lowe's commentary is usually welcome and well received on HN, maybe some duplication can be justified in this case?
Obviously that's bad for businesses - but it's great for consumers! I think the question that's being asked is if there's some business model out there that delivers what customers want (the ability to just buy a finished product once and have it work decades down the line, like "pass it down to your kids" long) while also delivering profits to shareholders.

There's a reason farmers want the ability to repair their own tractors without having to give John Deere an extra cut, you know.
My email:

Google has proposed a new Web Environment Integrity standard, outlined here: https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/....

This standard would allow Google applications to block users who are not using Google products like Chrome or Android, and encourages other web developers to do the same, with the goal of eliminating ad blockers and competing web browsers.

Google has already begun implementing this in their browser here: https://github.com/chromium/chromium/commit/6f47a22906b28994....

Basic facts:

1. Google is a developer of popular websites such as google.com and youtube.com (currently the two most popular websites in the world according to SimilarWeb)

2. Google is the developer of the most popular browser in the world, Chrome, with around 65% of market share. Most other popular browsers are based on Chromium, also developed primarily by Google.

3. Google is the developer of the most popular mobile operating system in the world, Android, with around 70% of market share.

Currently, Google's websites can be viewed on any web-standards-compliant browser on a device made by any manufacturer. This WEI proposal would allow Google websites to reject users that are not running a Google-approved browser on a Google-approved device. For example, Google could require that Youtube or Google Search can only be viewed using an official Android app or the Chrome browser, thereby noncompetitively locking consumers into using Google products while providing no benefit to those consumers.

Google is also primarily an ad company, with the majority of its revenue coming from ads. Google's business model is challenged by browsers that do not show ads the way Google intends. This proposal would encourage any web developer using Google's ad services to reject users that are not running a verified Google-approved version of Chrome, to ensure ads are viewed the way the advertiser wishes. This is not a hypothetical hidden agenda, it is explicitly stated in the proposal:

"Users like visiting websites that are expensive to create and maintain, but they often want or need to do it without paying directly. These websites fund themselves with ads, but the advertisers can only afford to pay for humans to see the ads, rather than robots. This creates a need for human users to prove to websites that they're human, sometimes through tasks like challenges or logins."

The proposed solution here is to allow web developers to reject any user that cannot prove they have viewed Google-served ads with their own human eyes.

It is essential to combat this proposal now, while it is still in an early stage. Once this is rolled out into Chrome and deployed around the world, it will be extremely difficult to rollback. It may be impossible to prevent this proposal if Google is allowed to continue owning the entire stack of website, browser, operating system, and hardware.

Thank you for your consideration of this important issue.
The windowing UI/UX I wish for is to arrange a bunch of app's windows on my screen, then run some tool that notices what is running, where they all are,
and what has input focus, and can save that state to be reinstantiated later.

Think of how live stage theatre does set changes: there are tape marks on the stage floor showing where every object should go, and the crew just puts objects
where the crew knows the objects belong, according to the marks. Yes, one could edit multiple fiddly ~/.{X,x}* files with X/Y sizes and positioning in arcane syntaxes. Is there no tool in the Gnome-everse that can handle this?
Just to be clear, do you believe there is a connection between money printing and decreased purchasing power?
They still can use cutting off the ISS as a bargaining chip since half the station is Russian and handles orbit raising. They actually did do that a lot early into the war, until Rogozin was replaced as head of Roscosmos by someone who took a slightly less bombastic approach of saying that Russia would quit the ISS once they have a successor station up later this decade.

What gets in the way is that the US has several replacement space station programs in the works while Russia knows very well that they almost definitely can't get a comparable replacement station up with how hollowed out their industry is.

Plus, since the start of the war, NASA has been investigating options for taking over the tasks the Russian side of the station handles with the various supply vehicles just in case.
I truly hope this is the beginning of the end for these bloated "boomer defense companies".

Palmer Lucky actually started a defense company after seeing just how inefficient and bloated those big companies were, and is already worth 10 billion! Highly recommend watching this interview he had about the future of all this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-sD2FTjSaw
How many people independently need to work it out? I doubt most python programmers know what atomics are and yet they persist.
This makes me so angry. As an early career researcher it is so easy to make mistakes, and have errors in analysis, or in ways of thinking, that to actively go and commit fraud just really grinds my gears and is just so incredibly unethical and pushes all of science back. we need to have a friendlier environment where honest mistakes can be brought forward without shame and a culture that promotes slow science that isn’t always flashy; sometimes you’re just helping fit one small piece of the puzzle and that is ok and admirable
Why use quotes for "dangerous" when the first sentence is literally: "Why Vivaldi browser thinks Google’s new proposal, the Web-Environment-Integrity spec, is a major threat to the open web and should be pushed back."
Based on some anecdotal observations, I think 1Password 7 was better than version 8. I don't think missing telemetry is their problem. Lots of UI changes don't sit right with me, but they're only minor annoyances.

I respectfully suggest they pull some devs off inventing new telemetry techniques and put some work into the backlog instead, particularly this embarrassing date display issue that's causing actual problems for a solid group of their users:
https://1password.community/discussion/131071/incorrect-date...
The thing is, most academic work up to perhaps your upperclassman work in college is very much not about going off into the woods and coming back with knowledge from far off. Its about being on topic with whats actually being covered in class, and merely paying attention should be sufficient. I have graded student essays in this internet era, and you can tell when they refer to outside sources. Not a bad thing if its not plagiarized and cited, but its almost like knowledge vomit. I am testing them on X and Y since I talked about X and Y in class, and you get full marks by showing you paid attention to x and y in class and understand them. These knowledge vomit essays, I see they don’t really understand X or Y and desperately try and fill the page with everything from alpha to omega that was linked on the wikipedia article. It probably takes more work, in a panicked state the night before the deadline I imagine, parsing this stuff out gauging validity from various online sources and trying to meet teacher expectations, than just taking notes in class and studying solely from that content. I even offer recordings and slides of my lectures so students are encouraged to study solely that material, and not go down some rabbit hole off topic.
It would be a nice thing to negotiate some solution or compensation, or maybe think about such issues before starting the manic rebranding.

Of course technically the emperor can do whatever he wants, but this breaks established norms, and looks hamfisted.
Inessential X Resources for Techno-Dweebs
Allowing me not to use their cloud would have been even more privacy preserving.
I'm fine with the Huggingface piece, but this joins the long list of blog posts that make it to the top of hn with the message "Easily fine tune an LLM! …by tying yourself to our proprietary platform"
Seven generations of a prehistoric family mapped with ancient DNA
> the best place to shame?

Please don't do this here. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

Edit: I suppose I need to add—no, we're not pro-$MegaCorp or pro-$web-destroying-dystopia. We're just trying to have an internet forum that doesn't suck, and you guys need to make your substantive points without degenerating into mob behavior.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
This is nothing new though, this has been true since the rise of TV and things like top of the pops. Because guess what? People prefer pretty people.

Once artists became visible, this was inevitable. The pretty people were going to become popular regardless of whether the music industry got involved or not.
Yep, Firefox should have allowed styling their scrollbars. Nobody wants those ugly ass scrollbars in their apps.
How? Sure, you can go look for yourself, but that will never tell you if the other million users are seeing the same ad.
> Consider using less hyperbole in your worldview. Today has the highest living standards of any time.

And yet the suicide rate keeps ticking upward. All is not well in Paradise Earth.
Normal people: "Musk, please stop all this weird twitter stuff about calling cave divers pedos and wasting resources on makeshift submarines. We really like the vision behind Tesla and SpaceX and want our cool scifi CEO back!"

Musk Fanboys: "One must recognize that virtually every human action [...]"
They probably want to sell it, primarily, or to help different internal teams decide what to focus resources on.

But if some product owner in their org uses it to make even one improvement, it's worth it to me. I really don't mind them collecting usage data (heck, they don't even have to anonymize it for me) as long as my passwords remain encrypted.

Edit: I mean, I trust this company with my entire online existence, including major financial and government functions. It's closed source and I take their word (and reputation) for it. Surely I can trust them to monitor which buttons I push...
Micron's New HBM3 Gen2 Is Fastest at 1.2 TB/S, Teases Next-Gen at 2 TB/S
Artists were getting royally screwed over by the record companies decades before anybody'd ever heard of spotify.

(Personally I don't pay anything for spotify, I buy almost all my new music from bandcamp)
Anyway, if an interstellar civilization wanted to make contact with Earth, USA couldn't stop them. And in the highly improbable case that USA found a way to prevent their population from knowing, it's only one country, they'd have to convince every other country in the world to do the same.

Let's talk about congressmen insider trading instead.
Yeah, Draw Things. It will be submitted as soon as SDXL v1.0 weights available. Quantized model should run on iPhones (4GiB / 6GiB models), but we haven't done that yet. So no, these are just typical FP16 weights on iPad.
Millions of people will simply switch to whatever other circus is put in front of them, as they have since the invention of the television.
For the Pygmalion thing, what should we use for the LoRA parameters?
Thanks for the awesome and super affordable service. It's truly a saviour for me.

Deploys from today: https://imgur.com/a/3h7yYlO
Any method that ignores the limitations of the instruments of production is indeed very flawed
Depends on how good their lobbyists are.
Lewis Capaldi, Adele, Meghan Trainor, Jay Z, Drake. I don’t believe any of them made it because of their looks.

On the other hand, the Beatles, The Stones, The Monkees, Stevie Nicks, Olivia Newton John - their looks were very much part of their appeal.

Same as it ever was. Face it - you’re old.
> you will get the standard Windows maximize behavior, which macOS calls "Zoom".

No, no you won't. Because 'zoom' is not equivalent to maximization. It means something like 'make this window as big as the current contents it has open for viewing in each dimension, unless that's too big (and then just maximize it in that direction)'.

Additionally it's just window resizing, not a window state. Which means that when you move the window again, it stays huge— so part of it must be offscreen— instead of snapping back to a reasonable unmaximized size.

> So I am curious what you specifically find annoying about treating maximized windows as workspaces.

I'm not GP, but

- there's a big, stupid, slow animation that must play every time you switch between workspaces
- you cannot float windows from other applications over a fullscreen window

It adds unnecessary delays and distractions any time you want to use a different application on that screen, and it doesn't let you multitask on that screen.