skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not trolling. The last time I had done this was in the Java 1.0 days.

I would invite you to re-read your code and see how many different things you need, and how they are expressed differently in different places.

"Any Java dev" - I'm not a Java dev. I'm a dev who sometimes writes Java. I am not good at remembering equivalent commands across languages. For instance, there's not much call to remember System.out.println when writing Spring Boot apps.

Different people have different skills. For instance, some people can communicate without insulting people. This is a valuable skill to grow a career.

Also, there are things not shown, like environment variables.

I love your comment as an example of "This is so simple, there are only 20 things that you have to get perfect, any idiot can do that"
> At some point we just have to be okay with that

We don't have to be OK with it, but it seems inevitable that everything is just going to shit. Starting with smartphones. That's why my current smartphone will be my last one. The cost/benefit of them is no longer favorable.

I think that the web itself will be the next casualty.
It's coming from a different topic, but I like a relevant quote from (the excellent) Dahlia Lithwick on her podcast Amicus (<https://overcast.fm/+Don0hUpKc>):

>Being in a family relationship at work never redounds to the benefit of the children
> Most banks have barely implemented 2FA, and when they have, they implement SMS.

One reason I slightly swallow my guilt at having a savings account with Goldman Sachs (marcus.com) is that they offer email-based 2FA. I closed my savings accounts at Chase when they enforced SMS-only 2FA.

BTW, I feel slightly less guilty about saving with these banks instead of my actual credit union after my brother-in-law (who has been in the CU world for decades) told me that if a credit union can't offer competitive savings rates, it means they are lacking in opportunities for significant local lending.
https://archive.is/RdHHQ
I thought about merch and things like that, but really, this is an open source project that a lot of people depend on, and it just happens to be backed by a US foundation, which is a pretty good structure.

Imo, the real risk to Signal will come from partisan and intelligence linked agitators from academia taking over its board and stacking the project with people who will add back doors, or acquiesce to state meddling. The more formal and complex the organization becomes the more likely it will be infiltrated and subverted. It's worth having a 5-10 year horizon for planning privacy tech - and organizing to make the arms race in it less necessary by reining in the agencies who threaten it.

I'm optimistic about the bluesky protocol, and what twitter may become, but without mitigating the official powers of privacy's antagonists, it's just a toy distraction. If you aren't using privacy tools to form networks and organize to preserve privacy, the tools only enable timidity.

This is why I was suggesting in another thread that Signal should preemptively pull out of the UK in response to their crypto legislation, as hiding from these people is just a substitute for action.
This comes accross as very passive-aggressive.

Researchers come to a conclusion and make a paper, this is exactly how it is done.

Others can try to replicate their results, the paper is very explicit with what they've done.
Like 1-10 wh/kg from what I've seen. Probably better off building a ring around the planet so we can just always have solar panels lit up somewhere.
You could just use smaller PRs

See: https://graphite.dev/blog/the-ideal-pr-is-50-lines-long
I don't even have a VT100. I have an Android phone.
Okay, so it's gonna upset how many users? 20% of 1% of desktop users on Linux and BSD at best?
The calls and evidence were crystal clear decades ago. The first people to raise the alarms are old and dying now. The first politicians and influential people to ignore those alarms are even richer and more respected than they were when they dismissed these problems a lifetime ago.

It is within human nature to not care about things they do not have to deal with personally. We are just taking on the debt of our forebears and the interests are knocking at the door. The younger gens will be even more miserable.

But humanity isn't going to die. Some more fragile social constructs will collapse but humanity as a whole will continue. Even a catastrophic climate scenario would not wipe out everyone. A lot may die but we will endure. For better or worse.
So let's just keep using the browser from the company with 90% control of the web and ACTIVELY (see this article) trying to make it impossible for you to do things like block ads or write a web scraper just because of "some loss of trust"

There is no perfect option right now, and Mozilla will never be that perfect option because they are human and at least three people working there probably want to make some money.

So yeah, lets just keep making them irrelevant so in ten years I won't have a choice and be FORCED to use the browser that says ad blocking is stealing and spoofing your user agent is a violation of the CFAA and all this other blatantly user hostile shit.

It's such clear whataboutism, to have ANYTHING to hold against the only web browser that isn't actively controlled by the people with billions of dollars a year incentive to actually harm how you use the web.
It's clear to me the Big 3 can no longer compete and will be even more reliant on government subsidies going forward. The midwest is one giant swing stage for presidential elections which guarantees the tap continuing to flow.
Since you dropped Tim and Vermeer, I loved this film.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim%27s_Vermeer
It's a feature designed to work on Apple devices that requires Apple-specific hardware. Why would they make it a standard?
https://archive.is/2qmL4
They could be running a pricing test.
Those interested in seeing funding devoted towards the study of this would do well do steer away from the political COVID branding. And if that’s too hard, call it “post COVID disease” or something.
Yes, and we could just as easily remove them.
TA is extremely useful for learning Python, Pandas and Matplotlib. The simple algos like MACD, RSI and SMA are easy to code and allow you to have a lot of fun learning how to build a simple trading system.

Other than that, its pretty much as useful as tarot cards.
> I would love a car that does not have a single display and just connects to my phone or pad for setting things up and streaming audio.

You need a big screen for cameras and such, because visibility in a lot of modern cars is about the same as the driver's seat in a Sherman tank. Unfortunately.
At least in Poland even during vacation they are required to be at school for administrative reasons. Doing nothing, but still forced to be there.
I’ll be the first to say it: it looks like breaking everything down into a dependency graph of a million tiny packages that nobody understands and letting anyone publish anything they like might have been a bad idea.
I have Chromebooks that have been end of life for a few years. You can use it just as before, you just no longer get updates.
It's exactly the same in Austria, you can always get fired without any reasons and without any severance, you just have to rely on unemployment. It still sucks though compared to other countries where you can't easily get fired, as the unemployment money might not always cover your expenses like mortgage, if you had a high paying job and got into a lot of debt for a house.

And this system of being easy to fire people hasn't exactly resulted in the well paying and plentiful jobs market the way it was promised, most likely due to the bureaucracy and high taxes on businesses, keeping investors away.

So having employees easy to fire is not the key to a good jobs market, but it's having the capital, bureaucracy and tax laws, coupled with the risk taking mentality to convince the rich to invest their wealth in starting new businesses knowing 95% of them will fail and only 5% will succeed, instead of hoarding their wealth away in multi-gernerational real estate thanks to zero inheritance taxes like the wealthy in Austria and Europe in general do.
I will never inconvenience myself in the name of fighting climate change. Anti-nuclear diehards can assume that responsibility if they want to keep hamstringing the only thing that is going to make a real difference.
Eventually, you have to go to war with the humans that don't care. Unlike smoking (where people chose to die, rather than change), you can't exactly wait them out.
I don't follow the comparison?

Many products that are open source have commercial solutions? For example, Elastic and Supabase.
Right but that's just you making a bad comparison on the timescale of this thing having collapsed previously it's pretty imminent.
Superconductors are a transferring energy technology, not a storing energy technology. Although they would likely augment the efficiency of storage technologies.
I think Cory is going a little too harsh on Uber/Amazon. People use them because they provide convenience and ease-of-use, and are willing to pay for a better customer experience. If anything, 'taxi medallions' are literally the original form of feudalism and collecting rent from doing nothing.
Selectric Typewriter Goes from Trash Can to Linux Terminal
> The nicest houses I know are owned by traders who know how to use technical analysis

That's a good point. Best traders know how to use technical analysis, they just don't use it to invest their own money.
Regular evidence will suffice. If people can make the material and levitate a small permanent magnet above the sample at room temperature, that will be sufficient.
The irony is that Commodore in the US pushed it a lot harder as a business / graphics workstation, but they'd ruined their dealer network a few years before and never really managed to build it up again, so they struggled to get it into professional dealers, while they failed to market well to the gamer market.

Meanwhile, Commodore UK achieved most of their success by making games bundles that the US was very reluctant to try to push.

E.g. the Commodore UK "Batman pack" in '89 was near legendary [1][2] in its ability to drive Amiga sales.

Commodore UK did well enough that they tried to assemble a consortium to buy Commodore International when their parent company went bankrupt...

[1] https://www.generationamiga.com/2021/05/09/how-batman-change...

[2] https://www.pczone.co.uk/back-to-the-amiga-500-batman-pack-3...
I don't know about residency, but we get tons of applicants that know nothing about what's on their resume. If you get them into an interview they try to talk around your questions in generalities. There are also a few "job parking" companies that we've identified. I'm convinced that these companies aren't real (their websites are generic fluff and the applicants that we've talked to don't know anything.) If anyone has those companies listed on their resume it's straight to trash with them. Hiring is not easy.
Lots of tuner communities still use them. Here's a few I frequent a lot.

https://forum.ih8mud.com/

https://www.stromtrooper.com/

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/
I would use FF if it was actually usable for me, but it isn't, so I can't.
Some see that as a problem, but it really isn't. "We" just need to rediscover true-punk attitudes.
Thin layers can be stacked.

What's more interesting is flexibility. Current ceramic liquid-nitrogen-cooled superconductors are not flexible at all; they are brittle. This can be fine for a transmission line, but makes things hard for various coils.
https://archive.is/KTqoj
I’ve always loved technical analysis discourse because it’s the starkest example of how to actually make money in financial markets, and that’s to actively cultivate information asymmetry among other market participants. If technical analysis were a successful strategy, it would, like most other techniques that can actually generate sustainable alpha, be a closely guarded secret. But it’s not. It’s something people shout about from the rooftops trying to get rubes to follow the bait. It’s the same kind of play as wallstreetbets, where you’re tying to increase the amount of stupid, predictable money in your corner of the market.
Their reaction is likely to hire you to write a newsletter to their customers, to convince their customers to trade on your strategies.

Brokers don't particularly care whether their customers make money. But they do like customers who trade early, and trade often.
They have to fire you under some other pretext (decided to eliminate the position is fine), if they state that you were fired for discussing wages, it's actionable (well, assuming the NLRB governs that job anyway).
They're right though. The browser should have had a mode that ensures integrity without privacy (it's trivial; use PKI to sign the content, send the signature as a header, client validates the signature, and you have integrity over plaintext; or just a form of HSTS, if you don't need PKI, because if HSTS is good enough for certs, it's good enough for anything ELSE, right?). There could be protocol extensions that support clients only loading dynamic or identifying content for specific requests. All sorts of features could allow basic plaintext connections with public content to be as secure as HTTPS.

But the browser oligarchy doesn't want to allow that. They want to force everything to be private, which has caused tons of issues on the internet. And actually, it has strengthened the oligarchy, by forcing us to use private services (such as DNS-over-HTTPS, VPNs, CDNs, etc) which locks more of the internet into the control of a tiny handful of super powerful companies. To the point where if one of them decides to change something, it ripples across the entire internet, and everyone is forced to adopt it or break everything.

Crazier still... HTTPS isn't even that secure! Every year there are examples of valid certs being created for MITM. There are multiple vulns that work at any time. Mitigations that are optional and only a tiny fraction of the web use. And cert expiration, HSTS, and other issues still take down sites accidentally. But they force everyone to use it anyway!
I’m not wading into issues of trademark disputes but I think your description really captures something here.

That mark absolutely doesn’t say “X” to me. If I saw that with absolutely no context, I would think it’s another generic brand logo with nothing unique or memorable about it except how like every other logo it looks.
I wonder if that low number includes all the cooling equipment though?

But even if not it could be great for a capacitor alternative or stationary storage.
> 3) The thing of real importance here isn't what is being debated, but rather how the debate itself was performed, and what it says about authority, institutions, honesty, and elitism in the scientific community.

This! This is the point of Silver's piece. Whether or not the virus escaped a Wuhan lab, the summary dismissal of the hypothesis as an conspiracy of cranks, without engaging on the facts, _reinforces the legitimacy of crank-fueled conspiracies_.
What is Moxie Marlinspike's take on this? I don't trust that an IETF task force is going to have the will to oppose government pressure for backdoors.
Indeed. Even with an adjacent PhD and a decade of adjacent research experience, it took me years to learn the very basics of climate modeling. And there's no way I can keep up with the literature.

Also, I don't have access to a supercomputer (ok, well, I do, but I can't both keep my day job and also use it for re-running climate models when I have a question I want to ask myself about them).

People say "critical thinking" and "do your own research" a lot, and I always wonder what the fuck they think "research" means. Apparently not what I think it means! Or perhaps they do not need sleep, do not have to work for a living, do not have family, have access to huge teams of assistants, and own a world-class supercomputer to help satiate their skepticism, in which case, good for them :)
> I wish we could fight for more rights. We are too spread out for protests to work.

One word, Unions.

Its why Europe is doing so well with workers rights in STEM today compared to America.
If you are a real oceanographer, why are you anonymous and using a throw away?

You want to both use your credentials to be taken seriously in your posts, but also you want to avoid too much scrutiny of who you are.
The sorts of people getting captchas are the sorts that would actively avoid "web attestation." It's more likely that they'd simply be prevented from using the site entirely.
Now that's a 15$ word!
Also fun when I was contracting was dealing with accounts departments which insisted on exact hourly rates, while my contract was specified as a per day rate.

So to put a number which added up accurately I wound up with 5-7 digit fractional hourly rates.
As a C++ dev, I generally see few but often large dependencies. Boost used to be a large one, but it's less relevant these days with C++11 and onward. There are others like QT, Eigen, GoogleTest, FFMpeg, Intel's OneAPI, etc.

Sometimes I see single-header libraries you can just drop in, other times I see large Cmake projects that you add as a dependency to compile when your project compiles.

I've never seen the kind of dependency chaining that languages like JS or Go show.
https://yt.artemislena.eu/watch?v=1kXnsvYfaF4 [video]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom_(TV_series)#Bryce...
Since you're fired, you ain't no Smithonaut no more
Leasing an Electric Car Is a Better Deal
Thank you for your kind tone (genuinely). I understand your concern. I certainly hope it does not become a debate about scientific trust for hours although you are right its headed that way. I have a great amount of trust in the scientific consensus, am a publishing climate scientist myself, and did genuinely enjoy this paper. It is my opinion that is instructive for people to know that studies on AMOC collapse are often misinterpreted when they are spread widely, similar maybe to headlines about experimental new battery designs. I do not think that the authors of the study have any ill intent or that their work is unimportant, but rather that AMOC collapse is an incredibly complex topic and that when studies on it are often posted to sites like hacker news (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28085342 I have been here a decade just not on this throwaway ;) ) they are often taken as a significant change in the understanding of the field which they are not (yet at least).

I see your point that harping on this fact is perhaps boring and repetitive so I apologize for that.
I have seen reports of how things go in "old money" families. It doesn't look at all like the idea we make of families.

They have access to vast amounts of resources, but family members don't have free access, far from it. There is council that decides how the funds are allocated, and when family members need some, they need to pitch how they are going to use it, and the expected returns. And if some family members are deemed unworthy, or don't follow some rules they can get expelled and lose access to the familial wealth.

So maybe that's what companies mean by "we are family". Or more likely, it is a combination of the perspectives of the modest families with the warmth of the wealthy ones.
Everything is wrong about this article. TA is just an indicator of market psychology, automating trades based on setups (sma) is a nonsense for a trader as it doesn't include execution which is the most important part. No trading bot have performed better than human traders, ever. Bot doesn't have glut feelings.
This is what saddens me so much about darknet/meshnet/"open confederated systems". They seem to attract the people and content that are not welcome anywhere, and so they show up here because they got kicked out of everywhere else. With the early web it was first research institutions and then hobbyists and early adopters. Nowadays you can't run your bar without some Neo-Nazis showing up and trying to make your bar their local hangout.
That's ok, you'd be writing a novella. I've never used any of those components; your stack makes me feel old!
In such situations, how does one distinguish a male with bad intentions from the others, though?

That they may insist on access to spaces they know are intended to be female-only, despite being well aware that many women are uncomfortable with this male imposition, is already an indicator of dubious intention. Perhaps not directly predatory, but certainly a violation of boundaries.

I don't think that an advanced stage of transition can broadly override this, in reality. Becoming a modern type of eunuch isn't the same as actually being a woman. It seems unreasonable to compel women to accept these as being equivalent.
much of what you're taking helps with Mast Cell Activation Syndrome, which is common with long Covid
This is always been a threat, even before WFH was common. How many jobs were offshored in the early - mid 2000s before the trend started to reverse? (and it never reversed completely, mind you)

Or so-called "in-sourcing" practices by abusing the H1B system to higher engineers at a lower rate.

This is always a threat, office or not
> But is it the same spike protein?

As far as I'm aware, yes.

> Does it end up in the same tissues as COVID? Does the mRNA delivery & creation vector matter?

I haven't seen any evidence for different tissue, or effects due to mRNA delivery & creation. Given how big the anti-COVID-vax movement and industry is I feel fairly sure that any such issues would have been found by now.

> I rolled the dice and got triple-vaxxed, on the assumption that I'm better off than getting covid with a naive immune system, but I wasn't under any illusions that it's anything but a some-unknown-%-loaded-in-my-favor dice roll.
> There wasn't enough time to wait years and see what the outcomes are, and also most people on the planet were guaranteed to get covid soon anyway.

I think this is a fair way of putting it, but at the same time it feels like the potential criticisms towards the vaccines always far outweigh any such criticisms towards COVID itself.
So is the climate change literature, it stretched back decades before we had concrete evidence that it was happening. Just because something is long predicted to be a risk by experts in a field, doesn't mean its likelihood of happening goes down.

I right read about AMOC back in 1997 while in university. It was fascinating and frightening back then. Still relevant today. It would be sad if it did actually end up happening in my lifetime, but humans are notoriously bad at reacting to bad things that might happening in the future - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons. We tend to only really react once the bad thing has happened.
Actually both https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_ene...
Metro systems in Japan work a little differently. The main difference is that they're primarily real estate hedge funds owning most of the property in & near the stations, rather than just being a transport network. Their main interest is in creating economic hot spots around their stations, and it just so happens that moving people with ridiculous efficiency between those is the best way to do so.
Show me your function bodies and conceal your types, and I shall continue to be mystified. Show me your types, and I won’t usually need your function bodies; they’ll be obvious.

http://h2.jaguarpaw.co.uk/posts/brooks-on-types/
This is a good point. Costly recalls and cybersecurity vulnerabilities in your car are actually enjoyable to young people. Having your car stolen by anybody with a USB cable is exactly the same as rap music.
End of Xcodeproj Files?