skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Always be in hiring mode, and be vocal about it so your employees know you're ready to replace them. Mention every day that you are interviewing someone, even if you really aren't. It's not like anyone is going to prove you didn't.

In a similar vain, try to prevent your team from knowing when other members of your organization have quit or been let go. Also, do not announce in advance that a new person will be joining your team. Remember, you want to keep your team in a constant state of disorientation.

Make sure to have at least one subordinate with authority over the rest of your team who can be the "good cop" to your "bad cop".

Use burndown charts as a way to measure individual performance, and immediately point out a team member is "falling behind" when their velocity is even a smidge less than it was the last sprint.

Turn your daily standups into status updates that only you are allowed to be the master of. Discourage your developers from self-organizing and performing standups on their own when you're late or not around. If your developers take the initiative to give you notes on the standup you were away from, display a lukewarm demeanor that tells them that their notes will never be read.

Speak as if your team is in competition with other groups in your company. After all, why should they be collaborating when they should be working?

Frequently ask your team whether they know about some new and/or obscure tech they problably haven't heard of before. Even better if the tech is made up! Your team members must feel intellectually inferior to you at all times.

Randomly pull aside individual developers on your team and give them a pop quiz on how one of their fellow team members is doing. The point of this is not to learn anything about the other developer, but to sow distrust and subtly communicate that you know everything that's going on.

(^^ Yes, that's based on something I actually experienced)

If one of your devs writes some code that you don't like, subvert the team's code review process by insisting they have a one-on-one meeting with only you. If any of the other devs like the code you don't like, you definitely don't want them around to defend them. This is your team, so take full control of it!

When a developer implements something in a way that you don't like, compare it to some nebulous standards, guidelines, or systems that don't actually exist anywhere on paper. For example, you can say that the new UI feature "simply doesn't align with our design philosophy." That philosophy doesn't have to exist because, hey, you're in meetings all the time, so what difference is it to you? Make sure that it never exists because otherwise it can be used against you. The point is to look like you're the only person who truly knows anything for sure while disarming any arguments that will waste your time.
What models does dreamstudio use? I couldn't see how to view them without logging in.
Then you are back to square one pretty much since the safetynet result doesn't tell you anything about the security of the device.
When did you last login to the website? Sessions last months, if not years.

I recommend not logging out, as you'd then be affected by this.
>I think the literary novel had its moment.

Imagine a large table in a big hall. There are hundreds of people in the room.

In the far left side of the table, there's a plate with fine pieces of sushi. Masterly prepared. Freshest of fish. Rice cooked to perfection. It took a long time for the chef to learn to make it, having studied with older cooks for decades as an apprentice.

On the rest of the table, taking most of its over a hundred feet of length, there are microwaved Hot Pockets. They have been left out, and reheated a second time. Some have flies on them. Some drunk guy has puked all over many of the others.

The sushi is left on the plate. Nobody touches it. Perhaps 3-4 persons savour a few pieces.

The Hot Pockets, meanwhile, get eaten like there's no tomorrow. Hundreds of people wait in huge queues to stuff their plates with as many as they can. Some even fight for one.

Now, few will even entertain the idea that they're missing anything by not going for the sushi. Many would even go philosophical, about taste being a personal matter, and how "they like what they like".

But, when all is said and done, it's their loss.
I want to build a business in the near future that will need to scrape large bits of the web, but I probably will not be able to with this in place. I wouldn't mind so much if I didn't have a sneaking suspicion that the company pushing this won't have any problem running their business that depends on scraping a large part of the web.
How are they any less of a political game under the executive?
There's a vast spectrum of nuttiness available. I don't think you see SpaceX successful without the Gwynne Shotwell sort of characters involved; I think Twitter lacks such a role.
You must have never heard of test automation with real devices? No human there, still passes this check.
>So-called "intellectual property" is not property. It cannot be stolen unless someone manages to deprive you of it.

There are people do not want others to use the avatars they made. This doesn't require the concept of IP or require some definition of stealing. They want their work to be protected and are looking to platforms to protect it.
Trump - like Johnson in the U.K. - likely did not have all the security clearances needed to access all “need to know” material.

A specific allegation made in these hearings is that there is a conspiracy to hide what is known from much of the government. Why people think that would exclude a President thought to be compromised by the Kremlin, I really can’t understand.
Follow up details - isometric exercises don't have to be just bodyweight, and can be trained for strength by performing the exercise against something to constrain the motion. Imagine crawling under your bed before performing the plank (now more of a pushup, since you're pressing with your chest muscles) mentioned above. You can push as hard as possible, but you won't budge the bed.

They're incredible for returning from injury, since you can specifically train ranges of motion, and the person performing the exercise has full control of the "load" - aka how hard to exert themselves.
Thanks for sharing! I just sent to https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/antitrust/contact_en
We all thought that, because we did not realize at the time how corrupt the abusive the catholic church was.

What she did was real bravery to stand in the face of so much opposition and mockery from us at the time.

It seems for some people they are still from that time.
> They couldn’t build a high-end market at the scales they needed to support continued development at Intel’s pace.

It's interesting how different things are today. If someone came along today with a new ground-up design for a CPU architecture + ISA, that was truly "better", all they would need to do is to show it to the cloud hardware vendors, and they'd likely get a billion dollars of runway shoved into their hands.
I am aware and love it.

Works great, until you need to chat or to manage your own channel.
If you're desperate enough, you can nixtamalize corn by getting your hands on some calcium hydroxide (referrred to as cal) and giving some kernels a good overnight bath in a mixture of cal and water. The obvious downside being that it takes forever (and also the mixture is caustic so you can't touch it).
> 'zoom' is not equivalent to maximization

Interesting, I tried a few windows that I don't normally "zoom" and you are right. I suppose prior to this I only ever attempted to perform this action on browser/document/messaging/media windows that are able to be fully maximized.

> there's a big, stupid, slow animation that must play every time you switch between workspaces

I wondered how I never noticed this, and it looks like I had Accessibility > Display > Reduce Motion enabled.

> you cannot float windows from other applications over a fullscreen window

Agreed, I found it handy the first time I discovered I could move a floating window over a maximized window in Windows, but I've also noticed that I let my windows become a lot more disorganized when I'm using Windows. I'm not saying they're related, it may be that I just don't have enough Windows experience, but I do find that I end up keeping my workspace a bit tidier on macOS or a tiling WM.
Does that make oil very cheap and therefore easily burned, or do you mean the emissions are a side-effect of drilling in the first place?
I’ve been on this site since the beginning. I change usernames periodically. I understand the desire to avoid flame wars.

Here’s a sincere question. If I called Charles Manson a bastard would that be flamebait? Are we at the point that calling out the objectively verified despicable acts of a person is flamebait?

It wasn’t a swipe at the man. Sinead suffered a lot for ripping his image apart. She has died now. It is appropriate to point out she did not deserve the reaction and that the protector of her abusers did deserve to have his image shredded.

It’s always ok to call out those who abuse or protect abusers. I care not that my post got flagged. I’m glad of it. I feel a tiny bit like Sinead. Even after all that is known about John Paul 2 people still can’t face reality about the man.

We obviously don’t agree. I’ll stop posting about this and just read all responses.
At least the friends who suggest meditation are onto something. When I was a child I discovered meditation and it became a crucial coping mechanism.

It's just that most of these people think meditation will solve the problem, not realizing that ADHD

- makes it harder to even begin meditating than for the average person

- makes it harder to stick with the habit

- makes it harder to actually do because the mind is racing as a default and not because of stresses

- only treats the symptoms and does not cure them
Failure to embrace/invent capitalism sooner isn't the main reason basically all graphs measuring anything related to humans start to shoot up in 19th century. Lots of factors contributed. There must be (given it happened) reasons that, while doing very well in some ways, more-free-market approaches didn't wildly outcompete everything else much sooner, though some efforts were made that way well before the 19th century (and, again, did sometimes experience notable, but not categorically-different, levels of success)
Corporations (apple / Google / Microsoft / Nintendo? Sony). They all want a rental model along with a console model. iOS is already just this … a device in which you rent software as a service on a personal device that you restricted from modifying.

The consolifocation of personal computing has been moving this way for sometime. It’s essentially late stage capitalism gate keeping.

As a child of the 80’s is hard to watch things keep moving in this direction :/
I've personally observed that the drawing of hands in Midjourney and SD has been getting incrementally better release after release.
Most power loss in a computer comes from MOSFETs, not resistive loss. Which isn't to say that RTP superconductors wouldn't open up wild new possibilities.

ETA: wrong
> Everything eventually becomes rare if not used judiciously.

Who judges what is "judiciously"?

Doomers have been predicting Peak Oil for more than 50 years, but we keep finding more. Malthusians predicted all sorts of awful things, but we keep growing more food, expanding where we build homes, etc.

> This mindset of unlimited supply is flawed. It leads to the eventual destruction.

The mindset that destruction is around the corner is _rarely_ true and more often impedes development which saves lives and improves quality of life.

Nothing is unlimited. But just as we over-fished lobsters and moved onto other food sources, so we will with everything else. Don't panic. Innovate.
The Great Firewall of China will become the norm of the internet not the outlier.
https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xl-base-... :)
That's weird, the stuff I'm listening to has good clarity and writing and inventiveness. I'm listening to people like cory wong, theo katzman, ariel posen, big wild, chris thile's various groups, john grant, louis cole.

Maybe whatever you're using to find new music just sucks? blink twice if it's a clearchannel playlist.
Sure, if you take a picture cutting out the context that makes it clear it's not a lane, then maybe it looks like a lane. I drove by that every day for years and never thought there was a lane there... Because it's absolutely obvious from the painted lines diverging from a point that it's not a lane. Now, can we make things even more obvious for distracted drivers and shitty AI, sure, and I'm all for that.
"That bastard John Paul II" was obvious flamebait—of course it was a swipe. You're broadcasting to thousands of people when you post here. Did you really think some people wouldn't react? Is it a high-quality conversation about Sinead O'Connor to have people yell at each other about popes?

> It’s always ok to call out those who abuse or protect abusers. I care not that my post got flagged. I’m glad of it. I feel a tiny bit like Sinead

We're trying to avoid online callout/shaming culture on this site. It reliably leads to poor-quality discussion. https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&type=comment&dateRange=a... Generally, the state of high indignation (and its correlate, high moral justification) isn't congruent with the intended spirit of conversation here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
A lot of people are talking about very cool practical use cases, but I'm here just thinking 'all of our trains could float, wouldn't that be neat?' [0]

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCMaglev
Unfortunately, yeah, seems that way...just like you said "they chose to do nothing" and luckily no one was in/approaching the intersection.

Look I'm all for knowing this information, that something like this can happen. But to be clear, in no way do I condone how it was done. This seems reckless for the sake of clicks.
> These guys will be worshipped as gods if they deliver

And rightfully so. Humanity is moved by great people and these would be great people. We would build monuments to them to symbolize their importance.
We're lucky
To save time on reading here is the key finding on the decrease of blood pressure from various exercises.

aerobic exercise training (−4.49/–2.53 mm Hg)

dynamic resistance training (–4.55/–3.04 mm Hg)

combined training (–6.04/–2.54 mm Hg)

high-intensity interval training (–4.08/–2.50 mm Hg)

isometric exercise training (–8.24/–4.00 mm Hg)

Here’s a link on what isometric exercise is.

https://www.healthline.com/health/fitness-exercise/isometric...
Every place I’ve worked has had a “20% tech debt” time. Universally, it’s used as a reason to not fix technical debt as opposed to enabling engineers to fix long-standing problems. “Oh you need to re-write such and such? Well that’ll take 40% of your time for 3 weeks and the max time we can allocate is 20% so…”
I'll eat a piece of sushi and a Hot Pocket, both are delicious.
This site will no doubt have the reports in either direction on the front page.
I just tried this and the UI is very nice (better than dreamstudio), with nice tool integration, and image quality is definitely going up with each new release. You can see a few results at fb.com/onlyrolydog (along with a lot of other canine nonsense).
The audience are terrible, but as a child I would have taken part in that. We identified as a group, with a set of beliefs our parents had chosen for us, and thought anyone that attacked our leader was attacking us.

Years later I grew up and apologised to Sinead O Connor on Twitter for thinking this way. But a lot of people never did grow up, not just Catholics but also people from other conservative religions. People still feel religious ideas are somehow innate, and therefore the criticising religious ideas is wrong. But no idea is innate, people can and do leave and join every religion and every set of spiritual beliefs all the time, so no idea is beyond criticism. A crowd of people booing Sinead O Connor 30 years ago is very similar to people attacking Charlie Hebdo in 2015 and sadly people still make excuses for both.
You are committing massive hasty generalizations.
import random
some_value = 9 # return a number between 0 and, including, 100

if below_ten := some_value < 10:
print(f"{below_ten}, some_value is smaller than 10")

Random isn't used in this function, but more importantly why would you assign the value to below_ten if the point is to just print it, why not just print some_value?

Even in the next example of the walrus operator - it is extremely contrived:

if result := some_method(): # If result is not Falsy
print(result)

Why not just:

if some_method():
print(True)
But they never make mistakes above NYC or Berlin, or anywhere with a bunch of social media + phone users around.

Just somewhere in the desert conveniently close to AFBs and other restricted areas.
sane person here, I would only take Elon's claim that something would work seriously if it relied mostly on newtonian mechanics to verify.

which model S being good, falcon 9 working etc, that is all it takes. basic physics napkin math.

anything with nuance (self driving) or human emotions in play (twitter), and he is the same as any boomer uncle complaining about kids these days
Do you mean something like Cloudron or PikaPods or SandStorm? "Self-hosting as a Service".

Kagi solves the conflict of interest aspect of search engines like Google. (No affiliation, just a satisfied early adopter.)
Sounds like Crow Instability that can be seen with large airplanes (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crow_instability)

https://epod.usra.edu/blog/2011/08/crow-instability-in-contr...

https://epod.usra.edu/blog/2015/05/hybrid-contrails-with-cro...
No, "anti-racist" is not just another term for "racist". It literally says the exact opposite.

> A racist idea is any idea that suggests one racial group is inferior to or superior to another racial group in any way. Racist ideas argue that the inferiorities and superiorities of racial groups explain racial inequities in society.

vs.

> Antiracism is the active process of identifying and eliminating racism by changing systems, organizational structures, policies and practices and attitudes, so that power is redistributed and shared equitably.

How do you read that and think, "Yeah that's just the same thing."? Wildly absurd claim.
Could you explain what you mean by fine-tune? For example, I don't have the answers to what the songs parsed out + genre identified into JSON looks like. You're saying I'd have to train the model with known answers, and then maybe it could predict with some accuracy going forward?

I don't see how this warrants the extra exciting popularity of LLAMA2, etc.

I still haven't found my own personal niche "good enough" test case
>large properties are interested to keep their content locked from scrapping

Except Google of course, the only allowed scrapper.
NASA plans to have other places to send astronauts by then. The ISS will almost certainly have its life extended again before that though.
Marketplace to connect leads providers to businesses looking for leads
I got this idea for a marketplace to connect leads providers such as Rank & Rent website owners or email scrapers to businesses who are looking for new leads to cold email/call. Does it already exist? Would it work?
WeChat is the "everything app" because it has a government monopoly. I'm sure there was and is some organic competition but it's also obvious they picked a winner and ran with it.
There are nuances there. I am not claiming that older things are bland. I'm saying that the people that are constantly pining on the past are. Really, it is more that they often make choices that lead to bland results.
tbh I struggle to see these incredible promises of the future for AI to evolve the way everyone seems to think. I do see the tool value and the revolution that can have but the feverish talks about AGI and the coming AI apocalypse sound very self-aggrandizing by the people with their careers staked on it to me. Even if there is widespread and horrible societal impact it sounds to me like they are not putting the right people at the helm to work on that.
That makes sense to me. If you have a specific use for each workspace then I see how reordering them willy-nilly would be problematic and break muscle memory.

I have a multi-monitor setup and I often find myself using particular monitors for particular applications. I would be annoyed if the operating system decided to start reorganizing them.
I actually like the ideas they have here! It feels inspired by the best parts of macOS, Windows, and tiling window managers, while actually being pretty novel IMO.

However, I actually like the "overlapping sheets on a desktop" metaphor because it's still pretty "task" based. Their example is a little contrived, having a lot of small unrelated windows smushed into the middle of the screen is rare I think. At least for me. A more common example I think might be:

You're in a web browser full screen, and then you need to drag and drop a file into a site, so you open finder/explorer. That appears overtop of the browser. Then maybe you realize you want to remove some metadata from the file you need to upload, so you go into that file's preferences pane, which is a whole new "sheet" on your desktop.

At any point, you can dig up the browser, since it still occupies a lot of the screen. Effectively it's a branching undo tree. Since you connect all of these apps together manually (opening, clicking, dragging, sharing in MacOS), you're free to go and fiddle with things that are going to be accepting something else from another window.

The thing I think is missing from that metaphor is that it's really hard to get back to what you were doing if you break that undo tree. You click the browser, but now all of your other windows are behind, and the whole stack won't come back at once.

If windows recovered in the stack they were opened in when you focus them, (in my contrived example, you refocus the file preferences window, OR maybe there's some gesture/keycombo to return to the last focus state) I think that'd make a pretty measurable effect on my window organization annoyances.
This can't be emphasized enough. Exercise is likely the single most important and effective intervention we have available from a preventative medicine standpoint.

If you're not optimizing adequate exercise alongside controlling bodyfat levels first and foremost you're doing it wrong.
“Experts Say AI Boyfriend Apps Are Training Women to Be Even Worse”

Are they so blind? This is disgusting.
And these big companies will keep abusing people because there are no better alternatives (from what I know, please link better alternatives to this garbage called X).
That's why I'm amazed they picked images with totally borked up hands to put on their press release. Truth in advertising!
the issue is that this double standard is conscious and intentional, rather than simply an artifact of probability
And that's fine and all, but it's been nearly a hundred years and they're still doing the same shit? Are we supposed to believe we are the equivalent of a tourist attraction? One where you seem to have a high likelihood of dying?
Hasn't Gwen's main role at SpaceX been sales? Is she also the main force behind spaceX executing at engineering?
I have a feeling you're being sarcastic but this isn't terrible advice. I've seen a lot of dysfunction caused by that one engineer who constantly complains about the current code base and tell everyone how it should be done. If a tech lead can get them to quiet down and move on it will do the whole team a lot of good.