skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
clojure.core/map is not incremental so you’d lose the performance benefit of reactivity at that call. Note React is not fine grain reactive and will over-compute loops; electric does not have that problem. also, e/for is just reactive map, we chose the for-comprehension syntax over lambda syntax because it lays out your UI code properly without making you feel like you’re programming with collections but it’s just sugar over incremental map. We could have shadowed clojure.core/map with reactive map, which would imply similarly shadowing clojure lambda with electric lambda, but we also highly value clojure/script interoperability, so anything we change in a way that isn’t 99% backwards compatible needs to get a new name. ergo, e/for. also note it’s really e/for-by (and e/map-by) because, like React, you need an extra “react key” parameter (they put it in a different place but the net effect is the same).
A pain in the ass was observed while writing was performed in the passive voice.

Nobody likes doing it, I think. We just do it because we’re scared our papers won’t be accepted otherwise.
Ehhh, it depends.

In theory one could imagine a scenario like a bank website refusing to be accessed unless the entire OS & browser stack pass attestation - as that would rule out things like keyloggers, malicious browser extensions, and session hijacking.

In practice it'll just be used to lock down content and force unskippable ads on users, of course.
The proposal author (who locked the issue[0] on Github) also commented on HN and has, so far, remained silent here too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36825097

[0] https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/...
What makes you say that? I've just downloaded the C++ source with the GPL licence.

The only thing that looks to be missing is the "Donation" version implementation of things. Arguably as the author wrote both versions he is well within his rights to set 2 licences.

Of course the counter argument is that he's hiding linked source code (the donation edition implementation), and the GPL states he has to make it available owing to linking, which he's failing to do.

But there's nothing actually stopping me making changes by reimplementing the Donation edition features, and making those available as per GPL terms too.

- Auto updater you probably wouldn't use owing to being a fork and not donating anyway (if you donate, you get the donate version).

- Parallel file copy is easy enough with Boost

- Portable zip is essentially the same as a static exe build

- Email notifications is fairly rudimentary SMTP/email libary use, but would need a basic config dialog.
The just stop oil people should be breaking windows at these peoples offices, not blocking traffic.
Meta Holds the Trademark on X
godaddy are active enemies of the free and open internet. avoid at all costs, using them is voting for a corporate internet.
Karpathy's Llama2.c – Quick Look for Beginners [video]
Prove is a very strong word. Science is empirical, an endless journey of testing hypotheses, gathering data, forming theories, and examining gaps in understanding. We do have more or less incontrovertible evidence for the Earth revolving around the Sun, so it's not a problem to take that as fact. However, there are many things that we are much less certain of, such as the nature of dark matter. The closest to complete understanding would be having no evidence to dispute our theories. The separation of this state and the ability to prove things may seem inconsequential as I've described it, but concepts such as the existence of God and the basis of human rights aren't touchable by science.
Sure, but twitter is a word that doesn't have any other meaning in other languages, and certainly no mythology behind it.
A trademark on "X" doesn't block using 'Xerox'
Every time I have seen the logo I thought of X.org logo:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.Org_Foundation
This reminds me of the time I implemented a semantic segmentation network using deconvolution and forgot to add an output layer for "this pixel is part of the background and not part of any of the classes". Until it was fixed, background pixels got lit up in different places in output layers and drove me nuts.
Aren’t Musk and the Zuck feuding right now? This is a hilarious setup.
After the migration, when they were "decomissioning" the mainframe itself, the company photographer took a picture of the migration team gathered around the mainframe. It was unplugged, being gutted, with copper pipes sticking out. Years later, looking at a print, it reminded me of the old pictures of a whaling crew gathered around a whale carcass--don't get me wrong, whales are much more valuable and important. It does seem like we helped destroy something we really didn't completely understand the value of.
I don't buy this. I'm sure most iphone users don't care when you ask them about privacy or manifest v3 as an abstract concept, but remember what happened when Apple tried to push a U2 album to them? They lost their collective shit. They may not write blog posts about privacy or donate to the EFF, but they have deeply personal relationships with "their" phone and they absolutely hate being reminded that it isn't really theirs.

If this weren't true, Apple could just start inserting ads into every iphone's Safari window tomorrow, and Youtube could serve the ad in the same stream as the video to defeat adblockers, and they'd make a bunch of extra money with no downside. The fact that they don't do this suggests that Apple and Google understand this: people only tolerate restricted platforms that do a convincing job of pretending to be unrestricted. In practice, this means that step 1 of Google foisting off user-hostile stuff on us is getting Firefox to include it too, which is presumably why they spend so much money on it.
I'm not sure what you mean? Mutability wasn't the issue, lifetimes was. It already implemented interior mutability according to Java's rules.
> Instead of the most areodynamic way of flying straight, and the worst aerodynamic way of flying completely sideways, you power-slide the plane so that it's not dead-straight and the extra wind-resistance slows you down.

That is actually not completely true. You are mainly increasing drag to lose altitude quickly WITHOUT gaining additional airspeed. Remember, backside of the power curve, pitch for speed, power for altitude. You could push the nose down to give up altitude in a power out, flaps out configuration, but you might overspeed your flaps by gaining airspeed. That is why you have the Tokyo drift.
My hunch is that this "dead zone" was detected by productivity tools that noticed email and Teams messages slow down during that time period.

I say this because it is relatively well known around my team that 3-6 or so are "working hours" in that, we are all getting stuff done and not chatting.
The whole point of using NAT is that you want to be part of the one network but can't get enough address space for your bit of it. If you didn't, you wouldn't even have routing to the Internet in the first place and therefore would have no need for NAT.

It's perfectly fine to run a separate network. You can do that and still access Internet hosts easily by having one machine that's on both networks and running a proxy on it.

But nobody wants to do that. Almost everybody actually wants to be able to route to the Internet and back, so they set a router up to join the networks, and then (on v4) they have to NAT because nobody will give them enough v4 space for their network.

Unfortunately there's a severe lack of understanding of basic networking concepts and of what routing and NAT are doing, even in people who work in the field.
My PhD thesis produced an instrument for measuring attention span: https://invisible.college/attention/dissertation.html

It is a lot like the author theorized— it uses Mechanical Turk to measure how long people will attend to a task given an incentive.

Anyone interested should be sure to check out this survival graph, that depicts the length of time people will attend to a task, given characteristics of the task and the value of the goal they are trying to achieve: https://invisible.college/attention/dissertation/survival.pn...
You should check the ‘whois’ information for the domain for the date it was registered. Here is a website to do this:
https://www.whois.com/whois/

It can happen that an already registered domain will be apparently available but in reality something the website is querying fails to provide the correct information.

This has happened to me in the past, but checking ‘whois’ revealed the domain had already been registered and was active for a while.
I wonder how hard it is to fight these trends.

I see large-screen televisions for so little money - because you can't turn off the data collection. People don't want to pay more, let alone 3x for something with privacy.

And the people who sell system with privacy, they can take it all away with an update. silently.

For example, https://puri.sm sells phones that are linux-based, but they have to charge a lot and the experience is sub-par.

I think there's a market for it, but I don't know if it can catch up with the steep drop in "price" for goods where the true costs are hidden.

Maybe legislation?
"Google" is the brand name for enshittification.
AMD probably decided that their transistor budget was better spent elsewhere.
Such is the US's reward for building out the nascent infrastructure of the early Internet.

Also, this is a US centric site run by a US based company. The "American" part is implied unless explicitly stated otherwise.
The Wall Street Journal is a tabloid?
Xerox is not "X". You may be interested in doing some research in this area what is trade markable and also the procedure. Even if the trademark is registered it can still be challenged. Other interesting things that can be trademarked include colours and sounds, even scents
Other people have mentioned ray-tracing in one weekend

Complimentary to that I would recommend TinyRenderer

https://github.com/ssloy/tinyrenderer/wiki

This one is a CPU-based rasterizing renderer, it gives you a good understanding of what a GPU graphics pipeline does underneath.

In the graphics world the two common ways of rendering things are either rasterization or raytracing.

Raytracing is basically all the movie/VFX/CGI/offline renderers (although it is also being used for certain parts of real-time in recent years)

Raster is how most real-time renderers like the ones used for video games work.

If you're interested in graphics I'd highly recommend implementing a ray-tracer and a rasterizer from scratch at least once to get a good mental model of how they both work.
The distinction is important in my opinion because it means that our technology stack isn't necessarily captured to the root by hostile interests. In these respects, a better world is possible without having to dig everything up and start over, for now.
I.. don't think that's what they're doing at all. "Sexual Bolshevism" was used in a derogatory sense by the Nazis, criticizing more liberal sexual views and practices by implying it was related to the Russian Bolsheviks. I think what the above poster is doing is comparing similar critique heard today, to what the Nazis were saying back then.
> The only reason most people need to still be connected to the grid are low solar days and peak usage that the panels alone can't supply.

Your use of "only" is doing a lot of work there. It is absolutely essential that something serves electricity during those "only" times, and in many cases a power grid with centralized production is the only thing that can do that.

I live in California, and I could easily meet my year-long needs with a 5kW PV panel install and a couple storage batteries, and live completely off the grid. I don't think I'd do that, as it'd be pretty expensive to set up (with break-even period at ~15 years, after which the batteries would probably need to be replaced), and I'd want the grid as backup. But much of the US just can't do that, especially in the winter when they don't get much sun and their heating needs (even with the most efficient heat pumps, with a backup for the few coldest days during the year when the heat pump just won't cut it) would easily outstrip solar production and battery storage.

The idea that most or even many people could live off the grid economically, with current technology, is just complete fantasy. And I don't think anything is going to change dramatically enough in the next 10 years to change that.
Big fan of Mentour, it's like Mayday (Air Crash Investigations), but with better analysis and without the bloat of silly reenactments.
We did it and I'd definitely do it again but my whole team is in the same timezone.

Our situation is a bit particular because we sell software development services while using the funds to create our own product.

I'd suggest you to think again about being fully distributed, getting it right is hard and you may want to invest such a effort in the product itself.
First prize is an 80 GB H100. Second prize is a 4090. Third prize is a PIP.
A cluster of stories focused on AI and data intelligence in venture capital. My take.
All you really need is to drop an insulated plug over the hole in the roof during the cool months.
There's also X, the moonshot company (Google, Alphabet) https://x.company
i had the same in FF desktop , blank page with JS enabled (ublock default = disable everything)

Then i enabled all Font and Cosmetic Filtering to ON on uBlock, and the website worked.

One of the few sites that requires Cosmetics / Fonts enabled to work right.
I find a lot of python like that. It's a simple language to get started in but an incredibly complex language to try and get across more than skin deep. Maybe not C++ complex but more than I expected.

It has some wild features and crazy syntax and if you know it, it's probably awesome, but I too like to keep it mostly simple and obvious.
I believe that was one of the tests that I ran, yes. It was a long time ago. Obviously the results are not numerically identical when different RNGs are used but they converge as the number of iterations is increased. That said, I think you are right that the RNG could be improved, even if it doesn't affect the results right now.
Because most people have better shit to do than fix their now-broken system every other time they upgrade their packages. I used to run Gentoo, was told on IRC after like the 9,000th such breakage to go use something else if I didn't like their perpetually broken free distribution, and I took their advice.
Your instinct is correct about being suspicious about how this dogma is being forced. According to James Tour, behind closed doors the conversation is very different, and people admit to things that they would never in public. As per another comment in this thread, people are afraid to speak out because of fear for their careers or being cancelled - which I think there was a documentary that showed several of those cases.

Dr. Eyad Qunaibi has a good introductory series that looks at evolution in a critical manner. I came across some material with English captions[1][2][3] for those interested.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYHhWkQZz30

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irwTgwkjkRU

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDrj3Gj8G6U
Of course, the musical Cabaret as well. Based on Christopher Isherwood's writings.

Unsurprisingly, the film sanitizes things a little bit and makes it into a Liza Minnelli star vehicle--which actually improves on some book problems with the stage version but sort of makes it less interesting overall. Still worth a watch though. The stage version is still playing in London.

The play uses the idea of being able to phone another table as well.
The current browser stack is a lost cause. There's just no way for anyone who cares to compete with Google.

But we still have TCP and HTTP. We will rebuild this place.
EU hails discovery of phosphate rock deposit in Norway
watching inodes fail before my eyes was … not an experience i’d care to repeat
Thinking about law (As Asimov's are), I perceive essentially an impenetrable barrier in this possibility space. We create order from the chaos of potential behavior by defining limits.

Currently, in this 2000D StableDiffusion landscape, there are no boundaries for allowable "travel" and you quickly end up in the "sea".

So if we want AI to behave, we should research how to define the perimeter (in thousands / billions of dimensions) and "wall it off" so we can ensure the potentials inside the no-no space are inaccessible.
Nobody claimed the Shuttle was efficient. The claim is that Musk gave us reusable rockets. NASA did that.
I'm not saying this to be mean but. 5 days a week, 50 weeks a year, 1/6th of the day driving for 14 years is roughly speaking additional 1.6 years of your life spent driving to/from work. Average life expectancy is <75 years in the us. IE 2% of your life was getting to a place to make money. I hope the money really helped your family and they appreciate your sacrifice
Well, I’d prefer there to be much less parking in cities and for those big box parking lots to get filled in with housing or something more useful. But I guess it’s fine to put solar in them for now.
Is it fixed angle? If so, is the angle chosen to maximize winter production, or annual production?

EDIT: ty!
I have to say that the denial is getting more and more surreal with every heat record that falls. Like it's beginning to approach Flat Earther level where you wonder if the people actually believe it or if they just like fucking with you.
They've been goofing on this on Mastodon.

https://floss.social/@XOrgFoundation/110769211019949515
Ha! Typical Scorpio thinking.
Its MIT Licensed and doesn't cost anything to use commercially, where as intro.js is AGPL licensed and you need a license to use it commercially.
> We can stop burning coal.

This illustrates that a big part of the problem is political, not economic or technological.

We have the technology and money to get to nearly 100% renewables (we'd likely keep some non-renewable fallbacks in place) in a fairly short time... hell, we could be there already.

But the coal industry is a powerful political lobby -- both the executives and workers who don't want to lose their jobs -- and so coal sticks around.
Thus far, the courts haven't been a big fan of this idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Apple
I tried to test this with nanoGPT in an afternoon, since the code change is pretty minimal. It's hard to get conclusive results at that scale though - to be able to say anything with confidence you'd need to run multiple tests, figure out if the 'outliers' mentioned only appear above a certain scale, find good tests for quantization performance that work on small enough models that you can iterate quickly ... It's doable but still lots of work, enough that putting out the idea and hoping others with more time+compute will try it out seems a valid strategy to me :)
More generally though I definitely agree that the trend among 'improvements' to transformers has been things that don't turn out to work in practice.
Hey! My nonsense is depressing, not wafty!
This kind of nightclub was the setting for "Dial M For Murder".
The big switch statement wouldn't necessarily protect you either.
Can you elaborate? (It wouldn't be the first time there was an extraneous feature that no one has every used in some code!)
Write an army of bots to check millions of domain names on godaddy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Photosynthesis is ruinously inefficient. Beyond that, turning CO2 into reduced carbon uses even more energy than just concentrating CO2 does.
So your argument is that science can’t prove anything because it can’t prove everything? Also you said science can’t prove or disprove, but it seems trivially easy to construct many things science could disprove. E.g. you could disprove that 5 N of force is not enough to accelerate a 1 kg sphere to exit velocity on Earth.
This site helps you run financial simulations, though. It's not supposed to be a product you use to track your account balances.
And completely horrible for anyone who values anonymous voting.

For instance, under no circumstances, ever, do I want it to be possible for guys with machine guys to show up at my door and "help" me verify that I voted "for the right person". Any proposal that would make that possible is a human rights disaster and can be dismissed.
If I were to guess:

AVX512 vector and mask register take space on the die, which is a finite resource and could be allocated to other things.

Moreover, power consumption may have also been a challenge, as seen in the early Intel implementations of AVX512 (especially Skylake-X).

And while AVX512 can improve single-threaded performance, that's only for applications that make use of it. And up until recently, that number was extremely limited.
Why Dream?
Where's Ted K when you need him?
Consider:

`5 + 3 = ${5 + 3}`;
const foo = async () => {}
const foo = async function () {}
const foo = { 'PI': 3.14 }
// etc.

And then also remember that HTML can embed that, and CSS. And then highlighting something like TSX which can highlight HTML etc. It quickly becomes a recursive nightmare.

And all this is coming from someone who thought similarly to you. And now about 3 weeks of full time work (plus using a pre-built library oniguruma to do a lot of heavy lifting) and I just barely have a performant syntax highlighter. There are still a lot of edge cases I'm working through though.
the beauty of having root access, as demonstrated by nature
I mean, it's in the name of the country, even.

C eh N eh D eh
Take a random hotel and make a uni out of it?
This is essentially the bulk of grammar tools like TextMate (though it also has the very useful begin/end token construct).

The hard part is likely doing it efficiently, and standardizing on a set of token names such that a theme ecosystem can exist.

TextMate grammar is the only syntax highlighting tool I'm familiar with. I'm curious why these others might be preferred. I only know TextMate since it is what VS Code supports.
This method was frequently used prior to the ubiquity of dummy tokens. XLNet was the paper that introduced me to this idea. I believe it’s been in PyTorch since 2019/2020. I would not be surprised if someone finds an earlier reference.

I’m surprised by the pompousness in the OP. Especially about something that most people who do transformer research understand. I’m also surprised that so many in the replies are taking the position of “this is what research should look like” when this is clearly an example of why research doesn’t work like this. Peer review is good for many things and one of those things is saving yourself some embarrassment.
Intel Details APX – Advanced Performance Extensions
> How are scientists supposed to share results in a way that doesn’t run the risk of someone else taking it as gospel

Could not care less, but federal funding should be shifted to institutions that spend >X% (politically negotiable) of resources on replication.

And as a consideration for federal funding, groups that get federal funding, should be required to give first crack to journals that devote >X% of space to replication.

If people still want to only do novel studies, fine. I can't stop them. But we don't have to fund groups that don't go back and double check their work.
More simply, there are thermal storage technologies that address it. Just precooling a building below the desired temperature at the peak, for example. Or, make ice. A cube of ice a meter on a side would be quite adequate for a single family dwelling.

It would help if Texas buildings had better insulation. The more insulated, the less quickly they heat up when the A/C is turned off/down, and the less storage needed.
Fixed. Winter.