skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
1) Not being an Apple user for exactly this kind of reason means I had no idea Apple had done this.

2) Apple users being willing to sell themselves down the drain is nothing new.

However, this is shit irrespective of who does it. Period.

Obligatory repost of "The Right to Read":
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.en.html
This is insanely cool. It’ll be interesting to see if this gets decent adoption, and whether the query language ends up being easier to maintain than sql.
> At least one top-of-the-game hft firm (that already relied on forecasts instead of speed) got burned on their first attempt to enter mid frequency.

Put differently: "A bunch of smart people who have proven to be able to reliably extract profits from microsecond trades tried their hand at exploiting patterns on longer timescales and were unable to. Even though I have less money, information, access to markets, and am just one person, I believe I can succeed where they failed."
I don't see why these transistors are going to be so much better than tubes. Okay, so you can make a smaller radio? People don't move their radios around all that much anyway.

We don't know what we will know in the future, or else we would already know it.
Just use Amplitude
From 'Young General' to 'Supreme Leader': The Evolution of Kim Jong Un
> If cleared for work and needed to keep their job, yes I would. Many people do in fact force themselves to work after truamatic events such as being hit by a car or being in a car accident.

And some people end up committing suicide after severe depression, so? "Push yourself harder" isn't usually the answer.
I think the excitement around this is partially people overestimating the properties of this particular material, but also partially people excited that if this is true, the method by which it works might result in the discovery of materials with even better properties.

Even this paper doesn't claim to have a particularly good superconductor as far as overall performance is concerned. It's not particularly close to the state of the art in critical field or current. But if it does turn out that their hypothesis claiming that the internal stress of the material allows it to bypass the current need for extremely high pressures / low temperatures, then perhaps there can be new materials developed that are better superconductors while still overcoming the current limitations presented by REBCOs and other leading superconductors. Also, that's not even mentioning that LK-99 has no particularly exotic materials. REBCOs rely on rare earth elements like Yttrium, but this just uses lead, copper, and phosphorus.
In this case, people making $21 an hour are not worried about climate change. They're worried about putting food on the table, making rent etc. Climate change is a problem for the elites/big corps/government. The idea of making it a problem for the lowest in society - who are also generally the lowest co2 emitters - is unfair.
The Risks of Taking Drugs Like Ozempic When You’re over 65
It is. Amazon uses metrics to rate driver performance and they're regularly derided for it. Based on that, I'm highly doubtful that unions would allow performance based firings in their contracts.
I know (should have included in my earlier response but editing would've felt weird) but I still assume one should run the result natively, so am asking if/where there's some jumping around required.

Last time I tried running an LLM I tried wsl&native both on 2 machines and just got lovecraftian-tier errors so waiting if I'm missing something obvious before going down that route again
Llama.cpp has been fun to experiment around with. I was suprised with how easy it was to set up, much easier than when I tried to set up a local llm almost a year ago.
Retroactive scanning, you have a point. Integrating the scan into your CI/CD would catch it.

As for the numbers: see 39 mins into https://youtu.be/jWujI7Hk8O4

I used to work at npm as the SRE manager right before the acquisition and the ballpark figures make sense to me.
Why so cheap?

Because the real costs were/are pushed off to the future, instead of being paid up-front. The real cost should have included the price of fixing the damage caused in the extraction/production/shipping/use/disposal of the product.

The cost will be paid. It only gets more expensive with time.
https://archive.ph/JzUf4
I've been using Arc for a few months now and find myself really missing it when I use other browsers.

This is due to a number of things, like the degree of UI polish and a UX I personally find very intuitive, but I think the biggest factor comes down to their features around tab management. Namely the following:

1. Tabs closing automatically by default unless explicitly pinned
2. Being able to group pinned tabs into folders
3. Pinned tabs remembering their original state (e.g. if I pin a tab, then navigate to some other page, I can click the favicon to return to the original page I pinned)
4. The ability to rename tabs to make them more meaningful
5. Organizing tabs into an easily-collapsible sidebar
6. Having multiple spaces for different "contexts"

These features may not be particularly novel, and I'm sure they could be easily replicates w/ extensions or add-ons, but the fact that things work like this by default and are super easy to manage feels pretty fantastic.

As an example, I recently started rewriting my neovim config, and created a new space called "neovim config" so I could quarantine the tab clutter away from my normal browsing. Then I pinned the GitHub page for my old config so I could reference it easily. And lastly I created folders for "installed plugins", "required plugins" and "optional plugins" to help me organize the GitHub pages of all the plugins I've already installed, plan to install, or merely want to test out. Then if I run into any bugs or need to reference Lua syntax I can open a bunch of ephemeral tabs to stack overflow or whatever and easily clean them up once I'm done.

I know I'm probably sounding like an Arc shill at this point, but I do genuinely feel like Arc is helping me get this work done more efficiently whereas I feel like just about any other browser would be getting in my way. The simplest way I could describe it is it's almost like Trello and Safari had a baby that somehow inherited the best qualities of each, with none of the drawbacks.
Meat Intake Associated with Life Expectancy: Analysis of 175 Populations
It might be hard to believe but this short book really works.It worked for me and about a dozen friends and family including my dad in his 60s. Read the reviews section for it on Amazon, review after review stating that the book changed their lives.

Edit: There are now almost 7000 reviews with the vast majority saying the book worked. The last time I checked about 10 years ago there was only 400 or so and that was very impressive then.
Forced participation in DEI is well beyond "equality of all citizens". In fact, if you notice, the very word "equality" is banned there - you must say "equity", because equality is not enough. As Kendi teaches us, "The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination". I don't think this has anything to do with "equality" - and yes, the fact that people are required to participate in this discrimination, advocate it and advance it, lead efforts to implement it, and "develop and implement a pedagogy and/or curriculum that promotes a race-conscious lens" - yes, I think this is as bad as banning a person from criticizing the government. In fact, it's worse - at least it doesn't force you to publicly agree with the government and actively lead the efforts to conform to the government and implement the government diktats and government-led discrimination in your pedagogical and scientific endeavors. At least the silence could be you refuge. It is worse when even a silent disagreement is declared to be "violence".
> What, exactly, are the "world changing" applications?

Superconducting computing is a big one - even if we stick to classical computers (i.e. not quantum computers), there are estimates that superconducting computers could be ~1000x more energy efficient than state-of-the-art semiconductor computers.
I couldn't find a mention if this supports SQL transactions?
> It is not fair in this day and age to require people to drive air conditionless vehicles in hot weather

Why? (Honestly.)

This reminds me of the windowless-apartment debate in New York. Community board members in rent-controlled units complain it's not fair for the poor to have no windows. As a result, the cheapest (legal) apartment was a bells-and-whistles deal. Meanwhile, I (illegally) subletted a windowless room in a full-floor loft for $900/month; even when (years later) I had a window, I put blackout curtains over it. The loft was a fair deal for me. Even if it offended another's sensibilities.

Give and take doesn't make a deal fair. But it indicates both sides have bargaining power. Given a trade-off between more hours, higher pay, a faster roll-out of electric vehicles, and/or more hires, on one hand, and A/C retrofitting, on the other hand, there are valid--even fair--tradeoffs the parties could have made that differ from yours or mine.
You’re definitely wrong. You’re designing a language that only works for “Americans” by default.

Imagine how you would feel about a language that supports Arabic by default and needs special foo to work with American English?

You need to start thinking of characters as a type. Characters do not fit in bytes unless you’re American. And even if you’re American, people will still throw emdashes and Unicode quote symbols and emojis into your text. I’d suggest that if a language doesn’t have a proper character type, it’s not a useful language for the majority of the world.

UTF-8 is a reasonable compromise though.
> chose MacOS first.

But why? Safari is already syncing no need another account and app.
If you run a lot of Windows servers, it’s sometimes cheaper to run old stuff longer as they are raising prices on a per core basis.

I was stuck supporting one of these environments, and made a business case to overbuy the hardware a few years ago when they did a “free” socket to core migration. They’re still running those things, as the maintenance on the servers is less than paying for more cores.
Are you arguing that a teacher at a public university doesn't have 1FA rights when teaching or giving their opinion on a subject they're an expert on?

I am skeptical if that is indeed your arguent. If university professors believed this, they would not take jobs at public universities; they tend to place a very high value on their ability to conduct research and express themselves freely on whatever subjects they choose.
I often enjoy seitan and soy, but pretending they're the same is disingenuous. Moreover, it's pointless — meat production is by itself carbon neutral, and there is no fundamental reason meat can't be enjoyed from time to time. It might need to get more expensive to better reflect its true cost, true, but it's different from "everyone needs to be vegan forever to save the planet".

After all, spices are just as "unnecessary" as meat, yet we grow them because they are nice to have.
Last I used Amplitude it was insanely expensive. Is that not still the case?
I genuinely hate responses like this.

For some reason, there’s a contingent of people that think that by poking holes and pooh-poohing things, it gives them clout. It happens far too often in tech and I hate it. Look how often the post has “can’t” or “couldn’t”.

Instead of giving reasons why something sucks, how about being supportive and talking about why it’s awesome and what possibilities this opens up?
I’m aware; I’ve been in the industry a long time.

They won’t be making anywhere near 1/10th of what Firefox makes, even with 1/10th of the user base, because those are highly specialised contracts.

Google typically won’t touch you at all (although the founders connections may help them here, but I could see that upsetting some of Google’s business partners). Almost every Google search partnership is a legacy one.

With Bing, you’re looking at a standard revenue share, of which they take a cut, and you’re at the whim of seasonality, not a fixed sum as say Firefox has.
Then, the investors won’t just want their investment back; they’ll want a proper return as well.

Like I’ve said, the monetization opportunities that respect the user are hard.

Avast made a killing with their browser, and they did that by selling user data.

The fact that they’re a closed source browser does not lend them any favours.
I meant intelligence (the underlying "g" factor) rather than IQ specifically, but other than that, yes.
Any serious (retail or not) investor must read 'Consequences of fat tails' by Nassim Taleb. Period.
Guess you didn't read the point underneath

"Just under a fifth of respondents — 19.5 percent — reported cheating in high school. The wealthiest students reported the highest rates of cheating, with 25.2 percent of students with families making more than $500,000 a year having engaged in academic dishonesty. "
They're looking at PaaS-style monetization to start[1]: free for solo users, but teams looking to use Arc's collaborative features—none of which I think have been formally announced yet—will have to pony up.

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVda3zFLlhc
or superhot for that matter!
> Some invariants you cannot break in rust, no matter if "safe" or "unsafe"

a better description IMHO is that unsafe rust enables additional functions which are normally not usable as they can create unsoundness if used incorrectly

because this are just additional functions it means also the checks and type safety of all other code is still always there and normally sound, as long as you don't misuse the additional functions to brake invariants

I do count pointer dereferencing as a function converting a pointer to a reference in this context, it's technically not quite right, but conceptually not really wrong either.

So e.g. unsafe rust don't allow you to write to a &T (immutable reference), but using unsafe you could technically bit-wise transmute the &T into a &mut T (100% guaranteed unsound!!!) and write to that. Still at any point all constraints when handling &T did still apply and so do constraints of handling &mut T, you just (unsoundly) converted one into another using an additional function unlocked by using unsafe.
I follow the argument, but one can't even make that statement with those numbers about most places SWEs work.

So if we take a company like Google where we could plausibly say "the average top salary for a SWE is $500,000/yr," already it is possibly more remunerative than most places an SWE would work. We could assume it was stated in extremely bad faith, that only 0.5% of the SWEs there make that and everyone else makes $75k. Or we could assume there is a ladder, a progression, and a path to get there. I don't believe the extremely bad faith representation would work here because of likely PR blowback. QED there is likely a path for a delivery driver to earn six figures at UPS.

> a representation of the gains of a typical worker who is subject to the deal

This is covered elsewhere in TFA, and is dependent on the kind of employee.
IMO it is not about social media influencing the youngs' culture, but in contract, just welly-designed products that fit most of their target audiences' needs.

The world is constantly changing and each generation is special and different.
It's really awesome someone did this. If you just want the expressiveness of flexbox and don't care about performance, this is perfect!

However, wouldn't the performance for this be very optimal? Check out the `Flex.qml` code[1]. It's all very unoptimized and dynamic QMLScript. None of the function arguments are typed. There is no way the QML compiler is turning any of this into efficient, statically typed C++ code. The beauty of using flexbox in the browser is that all the layout calculations are done natively in the browser without ever touching JavaScript.

[1] https://github.com/tripolskypetr/qml-flexbox/blob/master/qml...
>The arguments against are much more strenuous.

English is funny. Both "strained" and "tenuous" work here, so why not "strenuous"?

A dictionary definition says something like "characterized by great effort" so yeah. I wouldn't win that argument. But it sounds wrong to my ear.

https://xkcd.com/739/
"Exactly that" hardly. Reducing funding to a level of a year ago is hardly "nothing" and most states didn't even go that far.
That argument is, of course, nonsense.

First, private and public censorship are fundamentally different due to power balances. The government is enjoined from censorship except in very carefully defined circumstances. Private entities are allowed to censor except in carefully defined circumstances.

Conflating the two is the thing that shifts the Overton Window.
Sadly, I mostly dislike tree maps. At large, I never actually see the tree structure that they are supposedly helping me see. Well done ones can be pretty, but that is true of basically every visualization.

The worst is when someone shows a tree map like viewing of something like a CPU, but that is not at all how those are necessarily logically connected. Such that many go for an odd mix of tree and heat maps, but then fail to actually show anything useful that a simple ordered list couldn't also show.
Pro defaults to 500$ a year. It should default to monthly IMO. It's more like I'd rather be able to catch a small charge vs having a large surprise
Tell HN: I finished the short story I started as a comment in 2018
Here it is: https://github.com/jaronilan/stories/blob/main/Salad.pdf

And here is the comment from 2018 (on an account I lost access to): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18579131
I hope I never find out which is worse of chairs vs. piercings…
> As the article points out, many (most?) recruiter software platforms aren't going to show a human your original Word or PDF file.

I disagree. 80% of businesses are small businesses that don't use this kind of softwares.
And another reason is to get rid of a lot of US cash that's being devalued quickly due to inflation.

You'll probably see them stockpiling commodities for the same reason.

If the US can confiscate 300 billion dollars of Russian foreign reserves at the stroke of a pen, all the more reason for China to reduce her own trillion dollars or so of foreign reserves as soon as possible to prevent the same sort of confiscation happening to China. It's called 'hedging'.
I see, that’s my misunderstanding I was grouping all training as pretraining
Or even wires.
It's one of the reasons I continue to purchase from them. I don't return a lot but I've never had a problem with it - and at least once they surprised me on that.
I generally agree but the post in question isn't a strong or extreme example of this. The only thing that irked me was the "Guys," part
One solution is to store a hash of every n-gram for n from 2 to whatever, then report what percent of ngrams of various lengths were hits.

Did someone say Bloom Filter??
Have a look at this too, it's just an integration which langchain can be good at : https://walkingtree.tech/natural-language-to-query-your-sql-...
> but I think all downloads have moved to the web or p2p nowadays

Yes, yes. That is correct. Move along.
Keep in mind that superconductors are not just useful for powerful electromagnets! They're also excellent for all sorts of other functions such as EM shielding, antennas, etc...

High temperature superconductors are not likely to be useful as powerful magnets, but they can be useful for almost everything else.
This. Amazon is like Walmart. Walmart is great if your shopping but it's the pits if you're a supplier.
A.I. suspected in Stack Overflow murder
Low volume, and everyone who isn't a big company just buys clones.

If you are a company or care about reliability, you have to get the OEM version but hopeful you amortize it over thousands of crimps.
Netscape Navigator, the GNOME Pan newsreader, KDE's KNode newsreader, Forte Agent for MS Windows, and of course Emacs's Gnus, along with compatibility tools for a bunch of email clients (mutt, Sylpheed, Alpine, etc.).

Most ISPs had some sort of bundled software package which included a rudimentary Usenet client as well.
Not really, I wrote fired, not jailed.

Free speech doesn't mean that the others have to listen to you and agree with you, it means that you can say it and not have your freedom of movement restricted because of it.
The exact opposite of what many dictators do.

There are no country on earth with "full" free speech because there are always limitations especially regarding threats to the safety of others.
I don't think Apple (or any company) are paying "the most it can pay to all of its employees". Labor is a market, and in a market, buyers don't pay any more than they can get away with. All companies are paying the least they can get away with while still retaining the people they want to retain.

There isn't some fixed bag of money $X that gets distributed to employees, where X is uninfluenced by the market. If the labor market happened to change such that X must be more, companies would have to pay X or do without some employees.

EDIT: I think we actually agree. Roundabout way of saying the same thing.
Good points. I bet it's close, or a bit below as you said, in reality.

The exact details would be impossible to figure out without knowing precisely hours works, how much each person makes, etc. I was trying to roughly show you can increase wages for an entire company without 'causing inflation.' UPS has been jacking up prices the last few years and just pocketing the change. Seems the employees caught on and want their share.
Seems like a hot shutdown would be safer, if say external power is cut off.
Seattle in Progress
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnshaw%27s_theorem
I've heard of ghost jobs so I'm starting to actually really doubt some of this, I've literally seen the same job on the market for over a year now with a new chain of recruits contacting me about it every 3 months. I understand there aren't a lot of perhaps qualified people for that role but come on a year with it open? The repeat open positions are disappointing to say the least. At least change the description! I think a lot of employers are just stacking up resumes and waiting to use them in the future.
Please expand on why you think the teamsters are essentially irish and italian mafia.
It's just missing a pair of electrodes for the users to hold on to - they can sell their thetan levels for a few extra coins.
This won't work because climate change mitigation is a prisoners dilemma. You could negotiate for $x to be spent on climate change mitigation, or for $x to be spent on your ingroup (ie. union). In the former case, the benefits are spread across all 8 billion people on earth, whereas in the latter case the benefits will only be spread among your ingroup (tens of thousands of people?). Sure, a ounce of prevention might be worth more than a pound of cure, but at these scales (ie. 8 billion vs tens of thousands), it's basically guaranteed that the numbers won't work out. They can certainly try to negotiate for climate change mitigation, but doing so will be economically irrational and will basically be an act of altruism.
It doesn't sound very annoying, then. You use the exact same encoding scheme, but skip a verification step. Actually it sounds more convenient.
> A venture capitalist once told me, “There is no money in tools.”

That suggests he's saying there is not upside in a portfolio of tool companies. Following average VC advice gives average VC results. If everyone listened to this kind of stuff we'd be awash is generic SaaS CRM stuff...oh