skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It would be much less likely if we could get the market share back to 2010 levels.

Is that a realistic goal? I don't know, maybe not, but it seems like there's little will even in tech to try.

There was a time when tech was the biggest driver of alternate browser adoption, and even managed to make serious inroads into the mainstream. It's a huge shame that this attitude seems long gone.
Potentially that, or MacBooks, or Chromebooks that had a longer support window (though that won’t fix the fact Chromebooks are cheap and would still fall apart on them).
> If people could develop AI stuff on consumer cards

Technically people can already do that, by leveraging compute shaders in D3D, Vulkan, or WebGPU. I’m certain it’s possible to implement D3D or Vulkan backend for PyTorch, TensorFlow, and similar ML libraries. When I experimented with AI, I did similar stuff myself with C++, C#, and HLSL, and I found it wasn’t terribly hard to do.

However, PyTorch made by Facebook, TensorFlow by Google. It seems most companies who maintain such libraries are only interested in cloud computing. Some of them, like Qualcomm, only care about their own proprietary hardware. None of them seems to care about desktops.
JuliaCon 2023 Is Live
Ah. Makes sense now. I did wonder what you were talking about.
Hence my choice of phrasing: 'wouldn't necessarily protect you'.

So, yes, the switch statemement might be safe, but you would need to prove that your switch statement doesn't use those instructions. You don't get to claim that for free just because you are using a switch-statement.

Conversely, even if you execute bare metal instructions for the user of the VM, you could also deny those instructions to the user. Eg by not allowing self-modifying code, and statically making sure that the relevant code doesn't contain those instructions.

So the switch statement by itself does not do anything for your security.
New Mexico cop roughs up a mentally disabled man in the name of 'public safety'
I've noticed this is also true in regards to how employers treat employees. Low wage workers are treated like shit, and higher wage workers tend to enjoy more flexibility and benefits. How much someone is willing to pay you for your labor may in fact be a direct measurement of how much they value you as a person.
You need this FREE IAM Management Tool [video]
Ah ok the question is, what exactly is being streamed and why, given that the input state, per the todo-app AST, should not yet be transmitted?

The traffic here is "program debug state" — the electric callback was called on the client, so the client informs the server of this in case the callback has server regions. As you rightfully point out, there are in fact no server regions in that callback — and this is known at compile time — so there is no need to actually send that information, it is pure overhead.

The missing optimization is basically dead code elimination – we simply haven't gotten to it yet.

Note that the traffic is broadcast, not request/response, which means the user experiences no latency as the client is not awaiting any response from the server, it is simply keeping the server informed. Due to this, broadcasting "program debug state" like this is basically free, which is why we consider this optimization premature. We are much more interested in visible perf issues (how fast it "feels").

FWIW we are unhappy with dom/on (used in that tutorial) and it is about to be superseded, and the chattiness you observed is derived from one of the aspects of the design that we are fixing (there should not be a callback at all, the input should return its reactive state directly.) But to be clear the pattern is perfectly functional, it doesn't have bugs, and users are succeeding with it.
What is wrong with me that I see an article about hacking a microprocessor that was released nearly a decade before I was born and I go, “Ooooh, gotta check that out!”
I’ve tried and failed to read it twice - I just find the dialogue and characters so cringeworthy. Nice world building tho.
There are some regulation issues I think that promote this behavior ... :(
that's the problem - no you won't. The problem is you've bought too much into the stochastic parrot view of LLM's to a point where you are viewing it as a fancy content storage/retrieval system.
I believe a lot of tech choices made over the last 10-15 years were a result of zero interest rates by the federal reserve. I think some of these things were good tech, and others were made to compensate for the rapid influx of bad bootcamp programmers who were needed to scale businesses with the free money coming out of the fed.

I think with a more selective job market, people can make tech choices based more on tech and less on labor
I support this completely. I would go the extra step of not making internet capable phones accessible to under 14 year olds in general.
So, how can this be bypassed in theory? Any ideas? Brainstorming is allowed.

EDIT: Saw a few mention two solutions to disable the automatic verification on iOS & macOS.

https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-to-enable-private-access-tok...

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213449
This "Sir Galahad" approach of excusing the drunken ladies their misdeeds strikes me as rather like mansplaining, "manexcusing" if you will. Women don't need their bad behaviour explained and excused by men, they are quite capable of suffering the vomiting and hangovers (and learning from them) themselves.
I have the same - not sure if its related to many privacy plugins in my Firefox but e.g. google maps still doesn't render as sharp as in Chromium browsers - seems like using rasterized tiles.
They've been pitching and winning a fair few moonshot (heh) projects as of late, mostly due to their war chest and lobbying power. As a space company they've yet to have a spacecraft (or even one of their BE-4 engines) make it to orbit.
Yeah but the process to exchange the token will be "open sauce"! </troll>
I view smart phones as two dimensional.

On one dimension they are a tool (like a Sheika Slate in Zelda).

On the other dimension they are a toy.

The problem for schools is that the tool and the toy are packaged together.

A further problem is that smartphones are consumer electronic devices, so businesses will strive to make them as addictive as possible and are unlikely to support creating some kind of separation between toy and tool.

So I agree that a ban is probably the best solution at this point. A ban with legal backing so schools can focus on education and not combating distraction.
And drop my Ublock origin, bypass paywall clean, etc? Hell no.
Parents can't just get together and decide that their 14 year olds are going to be friends.
Who is going to regulate the US and Chinese militaries? The CEO of Palantir just published an open letter calling for a Manhattan Project for superintelligent AI warfare.
https://archive.is/KSOv4

What needs to be regulated is the performance of the hardware designs. I have not seen anyone except for myself specifically say this. And no one listens to me. So it seems that society may not figure that out until it's too late.
if not, please write one when you have time, short one is better than none :)
Some resources for grants and patronage:

https://github.com/fossjobs/fossjobs/wiki/resources#grants
https://github.com/fossjobs/fossjobs/wiki/resources#patronag...
If only they had some sort of attestation scheme to root out dissent at the source.
It’s hard to say until more details are forthcoming but this reeks of a cartel.
NameCheap.com, Name.com, and other domain registrars are good options. There are too many options. I use three of them for all my domains.

DNS is taken care by Cloudflare (this can also be by AWS Route53).

Emails, hosts, and others can be with Google, Proton, Fastmail, AWS, et al.
Was your experimentation more casual or rigorous? People take supplements but rarely take the time to even casually log perceived effects or use a self-blinded A/B study (my own lazy ass included). If you took a more rigorous approach I'm curious about your methods.
Could Google be taken to task by the FTC on this issue?
Tiktok is literally controlled by the CCP. If consumers don't care about that, they aren't going to care about DRM.
It isn’t even so much spying/bad content that I’d be worried about but much more that addictive nature of online communication.
Many adults struggle with it and kids in particular should first learn how to communicate with people in real life and pay attention to school before they can escape to the online realm.

School can be boring and a smartphone is just a too welcome distraction.
Build a new Web w/o Google.
Since when lead emits smoke? You'd have to heat it beyond it's boiling point that is 1750C,while the typical lead casting is done at around 450C.even if you managed to vaporise minute amounts of lead it's going to condense and fall out long before it reaches "your neighbour's house".

I wonder, does everyone that scared of lead own smartphones? (with cadmium in their batteries). Cadmium is very toxic and it boils at under 800C so your average wood flame will vaporise it. But everyone talks about lead.

Why? IMO because lead used to be added to petrol/gas as an anti knock agent. So there was quite a bit of contamination present back in the day. This has been outlawed decades ago, but the collective memory remains.
Depends on your goals.

If your goal is for your kids to not have access to smartphone apps, dangers and distractions, I fear it'll fail spectacularly.

If your goal is to build self reliance and problem solving skills, you may succeed in unintended ways.

I was born in 1979. I touched my first computer probably at age 6. I programmed in GWbasic when I was 10 or so, started turbo Pascal and oracle db lessons when I was 11. War started when I was 12, my dad got wounded when walking to work, and I was basically a fully fledged prepubescent adult partially responsible for family survival. And I am not special. (This is lateral to the meticulous way I built a flame thrower at 12 as well:)

Point is, 12 and 13 year olds are smart and resourceful and have a lot of time and motivation to outwit you. We somehow forget our 12 year old selves when we become adults. I reread enders game when I need to remind myself (my initial reaction to the book was "what a horribly unrealistic way to portray kids, they think like adults", followed by the realization I did think like that as a kid! We just start telling ourselves weird tales of superiority as we get old).

You are not repeat not going to successfully keep your kids from this stuff until they're 14. My 12 year old niece who is like the most innocent person I know taught me more about dark Web than I knew. You don't raise your child in isolation. They'll learn from you but also hundred other kids. You can hope to be involved and maybe, maybe guide. I fear that by not giving them access yourself in a guided fashion, all you'll be doing is ensuring they have it in unguided fashion.

(Fwiw I have a 2 and 4 year old and struggle with exact same questions coming up)
From Article.
""As the pandemic coronavirus spread between March 2020 and April 1, 2021, people from both parties saw similar surges in excess deaths—that is, deaths above what would be expected had there not been a global health crisis. But after April 1, when all adults in both states were eligible for vaccination, a gap emerged in the rate of excess deaths between Republican and Democratic voters. Republicans had an excess death rate 7.7 percentage points higher than their blue counterparts, amounting to a 43 percent difference in the excess death rates.""
the bar for public creativity may be relatively low, but in my experience as a candidate, interviewer, and hiring manager, it really does not actually make a difference. i'm generally too busy to be looking into this kind of stuff. hell, i rarely read your whole resume.

let's talk and see if there's something. outside of that it's just wasting time.
I see we are leaving the honeymoon period and heading towards the litigation phase in the classic, miracle weight loss drug hype cycle.
Oh, it's not only on iOS [1]. It's Android too [2].

1. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicecheck/valida...

2. https://developer.android.com/google/play/integrity
https://bluefina.com/bluefin-tuna-price-why-the-cost-is-wort...

It’s true that in 2019, a 612-pound bluefin tuna sold for an incredible $3 million at Tokyo’s famous Tsukiji fish market. While this is not a typical price, it shows how prized bluefin tuna is as the very best tuna fish out there.

The bluefin tuna price that restaurants and customers pay depends on several factors. These include where the fish is from, the company you buy it from, and how sustainable it is.

First of all, it’s completely different from the average tuna that you buy canned at the supermarket. That type of tuna is albacore tuna. A typical adult albacore weighs 80lb.

Contrast that with the record-breaking bluefin tuna that sold a the Tokyo fish market in 2019. That whopping example weighed 612lb!

Clearly, they are different species and take a very different amount of time to grow to maturity. In fact, they are very slow-growing. It’s also impossible to breed bluefin tuna in captivity.

> https://themostexpensive.org/most-expensive-tuna/

Here Are the Top 5 Most Expensive Types of Tuna in the World:

Types of Tuna - Max Weight - Used For - Max Price

Bluefin - 1,472lbs - Sushi - $5,000 per pound

Bigeye - 462lbs - Steaks & sushi - $42 per pound

Yellowfin - 427lbs - Canned, steaks & sushi - $35 per pound

Skipjack - 73lbs - Canned & steaks - $23 per pound

Albacore - 88lbs - Canned & steaks - $22 per pound

> https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/reports/2021-tuna-retailer-sc...

The sustainability of many of the world’s capture fisheries continues to be hampered by overexploitation, overcapacity, ineffective management, harmful subsidies, by-catch…and illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, with ongoing habitat degradation and loss of gear creating further pressures on the marine environment.” – UN World Ocean Assessment

"Stock depletion, lack of recovery, and associated loss of value are often driven by fisheries managers’ prioritization of short-term profits over the long-term health of fish populations.” – PEW

“All over the world, human and labor rights violations and abuses in the sector have been documented, and despite commendable efforts by many governments and the industry, there are still too many cases of unacceptable practices taking place. These occur not only in developing countries but also in the developed world, and at all stages along value chains.” – UN FAO
It just splits the web. You will have web properties that don't necessitate its usage. These will be available to everyone. Then you will have the Googlesphere which will have all google sites and all sites integrating google services that will only be available from "verified environments"
> Your kids will be excluded from a lot of conversations and events.

Raising your children is the most important thing anybody does in their life. It's not something you do alone, but there is a hierarchy on who should have the most say in raising your children. The hierarchy is something like this:

1. The parents

2. Close family

3. Other parents in the community (if you have such community)

4. Close friends of the parents

5. Tutors, coaches and teachers

6. Responsible and respected adults in the community

7. Any adult

8. Any teenager

9. Criminal gangs

10. Television and Hollywood

11. Silicon Valley companies

12. Government workers

Now, if a child gets excluded from not having a smart phone, it seems that everybody above number 11 are somewhat or blatantly neglecting their duties. Get together with other parents and start taking control back from number 11 in raising your children.
This advice has strong 1998 vibes.
Ask HN: Why do some services allow you to routinely bypass 2FA
On GitHub, I have 2FA active. Whenever I try to perform some sensitive action, I'm presented with a 2FA challenge. But there is the option to simply use your password, at the bottom, which I have used frequently.

So why present the 2FA prompt at all if I can simply choose to not use it? Maybe I have that option because I'm accessing from a registered browser. Whatever the case, it's a redundant prompt.

I've seen this pattern on other online services, for example Wise.com
>And if they are broken up, now you’re in 5 companies’ databases, win?

Yes, win. I'd rather be in a number of smaller businesses database than in the one last company's.
The FTC isn't going to do anything as Google/Alphabet is a big donor to the Democrats.

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/alphabet-inc/recipients?id=...

Here is them lobbying specifically around antitrust reform legislation: https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/bills/specific_...
Keen to see how this progress. I thought their NDA was in order
Make Visual Studio Code More Like IntelliJ Idea
Smart watches too. Big distraction problem in my son’s grade school and they are used on math tests.
Unesco does not seem to want you to see what they want to show children in schools.

Probably subversive material.
Indeed. As a side note i wasnt praising corporations, quite the contrary. Some of the things provided are good but overall corporations are detrimental to the society, environment, public health, security and the economy. Both in the music industry and outside.
And if they prohibit it, Google will just pay a several billion dollar fine. At the end of the day, it's just a cost of doing business. Something like an extra 2% tax raise or something. Whatever. Dividend time.
Have those adults been taught about self control and concentration in school?
Man, I want to work at TigerBeetle so bad. So much cool stuff comes out of that company, exactly the type of stuff that I love thinking about and working on.

On a semi-related note, if you want to look into compiler backends/IRs, there's QBE[0], which is far simpler than LLVM IR, but gets most of the point across

[0]: https://c9x.me/compile/
I mean that’s part of the point. It’s there to exactly lock out scrapers. Or crawlers, for that matter. What a happy little coincidence.
to be fair, WEI has strong 1984 vibes
I've heard time and time again how this is "the end of the free web". Can someone succinctly explain how this is the case, for somebody not familiar with web browser architecture? What does WEI provide that wasn't previously possible?
It is interesting that the "of" style is common in Ocaml where the left-to-right style is common. They seem to clash!

I would like to know what it's like to work in a fully left-to-right language, for example, to define `my_floob`:

let my_crumb |> zing_to_crumb |> crumb_to_glork |> glork_to_floob = my_floob
Is your firefox rendering google maps the same sharp (vectorized) as in chromium? In my firefox it seems not so sharp and rasterized (tiles?), but might be related to some privacy plugins/settings I'm using.
Citation for what, increased anti-trust activity from the FTC over the last two years? Sure, here's one article:

> Private equity deals and transactions in the healthcare and technology sectors continue to attract heightened antitrust scrutiny...

> The US agencies have also demonstrated an increased interest in challenging vertical transactions.

> In January 2022, for example, the FTC sued to block Lockheed Martin's US$4.4 billion proposed acquisition of Aerojet, which the parties subsequently abandoned.

> Increased enforcement, combined with the agencies' reluctance to approve remedies, has created an uncertain environment where commercial parties should be increasingly prepared to litigate mergers.

> The ramping up of antitrust enforcement in 2022...

https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/us-ma-fy-2022...

Here's another:

> Since 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) have filed multiple lawsuits against major tech companies...

> "The agencies have started laying the foundations for a more interventionist stance over the last two years, and this year is when we'll start to see some of those efforts come to fruition -- or be stopped in their tracks by the courts," Kass said.

https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/news/252528606/FTC-push...

I'm sure you can find more.
Yes, kinda.
But I am in Europe.
Speaking of regulations, I think an angle that can help spread awareness to the general public is casting this as essentially being the equivalent of SOPA/PIPA but being pushed by Big Tech rather than Big Gov.
Since the cat is out of the bag regarding mandatory education, I don't support this.

Allowing kids to use smartphones freely in schools 1) will act as a very good filter and 2) will keep the most annoying kids entertained thus allowing the kids who pass through the former filter to learn without interruptions.

The way it works now, we're just going for the lowest common denominator. The results are obvious.
Looking at the pricing, if you only spin those instances up when you need them, you can go a while before you break even. Otherwise it only takes a few months depending on the GPU.

I would imagine that someone really serious about training (or any other CUDA workload) uses both.
Having been a teenager once myself, I can attest that there's nothing in this world that'd more successfully ostricize a kid socially, than grouping them with other isolated kids.
There is no chance Mozilla does anything that actually matters here. They may do some virtue signaling and put out a statement about how they support the open web but nothing more.
>I guess at some point teachers gave up trying to enforce the rules. Or the idea of being away from your phone for hours at a time became strange to everyone. Or maybe teachers thought they could incorporate phones into lesson plans.

I can speak from experience in teaching, and being married to a teacher who both have seem the implementation of smartphones and the consequences thereof.

It's not the students, it's not the teachers, it's the parents. Students are usually salty, but understand if you have a no phone policy. It's the parents. They DEMAND to be able to contact their child at all hours of the day, regardless of whether the child is in class. They EXPECT the school to support them texting and/or calling their kid to discuss trivial nonsense throughout the day.

The ability of people to trust that their kids are safe in schools is gone. The ability of people to understand a message that MUST be sent right now versus one that can wait is gone. The ability of people to deal with any amount of not being connected is gone.

It's, honestly, disturbing. I don't know what it is about it that bothers me so much, but it frightens me.

It's the constant connection, I think. I feel like maybe it's fostering a societal inability to be independent. As an example - people have questioned my parenting because my son goes into the woods by himself (we live in a rural area). They have questioned how much I actually care about him because I don't follow him and/or know everything he's doing all the time. I'm a firm believer in independence fostered safely. School and playtime are two places that this independence needs to be fostered, and parents today have completely forgotten that their kids will have to exist without them some day.

This might come across as a little /get off my lawn/, but it's my experience across decades of working in education.
The antifraud company that worked with Google on the WEI proposal is already calling for the removal of holdouts from the spec[0], because:

- Attestation does not work as an antifraud signal unless it is mandatory - fraudsters will just pretend to be a browser doing random holdout otherwise.

- The banks that want attestation do not want you using niche browsers to login to their services.

[0] https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/...
Is an illegal opcode something that was intentionally added to the instruction set but was disabled by the manufacturer?

Or is it a side effect of calling an undefined operation?