skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Brave is, at the end of the day, in the same boat as Google: they make money on ads. They also happen to be an ad blocker, so, of course, they won't implement WEI... but, as they also themselves present ads and need to make sure people don't block their ads while claiming to have seen them--which is trivial to do currently, btw--their product managers and even Brendan Eich himself had often laid out a roadmap that involves trusted computing technology with the same ad fraud justification Google is using, whether for their SDK or the browser itself.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BATProject/comments/bw6sek/

https://www.reddit.com/r/BATProject/comments/b7rwbx/

> 1/ native C++/Rust code, no JS tags on page that have zero integrity. That means ability to use SGX/TrustZone to check integrity and develop private user score from all sensor inputs in the enclave; ...

> We already have to deal w/ fraud. That is inherent in any system with users and revenue shares or grants. We do it better via C++ and (under way) SGX or TrustZone integrity checking + OS sensor APIs, vs today’s antifraud scripts that are routinely fooled.

> What Brave offers that's far better than today's joke of an antifraud system for ads is as follows: 1/ integrity-checked open source native code, which cannot be fooled by other JS on page; ... (1) requires SGX or ARM equivalent, widespread on mobile.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BATProject/comments/9yys6b/

https://www.reddit.com/r/BATProject/comments/97trex/comment/...

> Part of the roadmap (details in update) is a BAT SDK. Obviously it would be open source, but more: we would require Secure Remote Attestation (Intel SGX broken but ARM TrustZone as used by Trustonic may be ok) to prove integrity of the SDK code in app.
> I thought it ironic recalling how many people had sold containers as lighter weight VMs

That's your problem there, containers are by design not VMs. Anyone who sold them as such aren't understanding the tech and you shouldn't have blindly trusted them.
If you used Linux like you would a true firewall and filtered a bridged or routed packet it should filter fine. It's really an interaction of giving low level network access to an application on the same box you're trying to do high level filtering on, then being surprised the high level filter misses the low level data.

I've never liked the way packet sockets are exposed on any operating system though. Exposing them is such an afterthought that the only way to use them is to basically act like the rest of the networking system plain doesn't exist. I shouldn't have to have raw network permissions to send and receive any packet just to be able to mark that I want to send and receive e.g. LLDP (or, on Windows, make a driver that even allows me a way to send such packets from user space in the first place). Operating systems truly offer "TCP/IP" (and UDP and maybe a few other select protocols, depending what you load) stacks not "network stacks" which give you access to each piece equally. Even plain raw IP sockets are increasingly ignored.

/rant of a network guy.
The problem with Design Thinking is that Design Thinking has become a cargo-cult of meaningless buzzwords and hot air. The same can be said about Agile -- it's just a collection of buzzwords loosely connected into a "framework" or "approach" or "school of thought" but it's certainly difficult to put an exact pin on what exactly DT and Agile entail.

But if we can't agree on the specifics -- at least we can agree on the broad points right?
- Agile is about iterating quickly, making smaller changes more frequently, etc.
- DT is about empathizing with the end user, considering the problem before solving it, and then attempting to fix it and asking for feedback

The problem is, once you cut through all the bullshit, you're left with what is really just common-sense wisdom. So they're faced with a choice:
- Either you teach the core concept sans-BS, which can't be monetized.
- Or you build an entire ecosystem of hot air, buzzwords, tooling, artifacts, blog posts and rituals around your obvious wisdom, which is how we ended up with Stories and Sprints and User Points and Epics and JIRA and Scrum and all the other crap. You can now sell $12,000 bootcamps, $100k software, etc.
So, higher concurrency in exchange for a higher chance of COMMIT failing. Not a big problem IMO if you handle failures properly (either abort or retry as needed), which you should if you're deliberately using this feature.

In fact, one should always assume that a transaction might fail, since other databases aren't immune to conflicts and deadlocks, either. The only difference with SQLite is that it is very clear and explicit about what it is doing.
Why should I, a consumer repeatedly harmed by google's actions in strongarming the web to their desires, care?
Climate change affects both variance and mean of the weather. Which means both colder and hotter weather, and worse large scale events.
What's dangerous about deadlock? Sqlite doesn't throw error if it encounters deadlock?
I can't remember the last time a new technology became widely available that wasn't somehow used against us. There's always a catch. New products are often designed to work on behalf of people other than the "owner", and often are designed to prevent the "owner" from being able to do what they want with the product.
There's a lot more chargers than people realize. A ton have been added in just the last year.

https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_locations.html#/an...
The difference is Design Thinking requires extensive documentation for each step.

You don't just empathize, you create characters with backstory.

You don't just define, you create a story outline with plot, protagonists, and antagonists.

You don't just ideate, you write novellas of your greatest achievements: deciding on the right color for error messages, the perils of rounded corners, and how you overcame the adversity of outdated stereotypes to make buttons that are fair and equitable to all people.

And so on...
> > He soon realized he was sometimes getting less than half that much range

Either he has VERY BAD driving habits, or he's driving in some extreme scenarios.

I have a Model 3 Performance that's estimated to have a 299 mile range, IIRC. I've driven at 75 mph in 30F weather, and it reduced my range to about 230 miles. That's just shy of 25%, which while is certainly a significant reduction, is not the >50% the guy was dealing with.

Do people think they'll get the full EPA range at 70+ mph with the heat or A/C on? I always assumed EPA ranges were done on flat terrain at 60 mph with climate controls off and expected any deviation from that to reduce my range.

That all said, getting over 50% less than estimate range is pretty bad, and unless they're driving fast in super cold weather up hill, it really points to a potentially faulty battery that Tesla is trying to get out of replacing.
If only there were some way to produce some kind of "interval" of scores where you were confident that the actual score sat, and then had some way of comparing these intervals between the different models...
I really don’t think it’s hard and basically everyone knows what is meant by this. Physicists just like to be pedantic about the technicalities of what “before” means.
You just have to click the title of the thread and it will take you to the Reuters article and you will be able to read the entire story.
Yes, if by conditional sampling you mean upsampling the minority class
Fast and Memory efficient lattice Boltzmann CFD software, running on all GPUs
This is super cool! What emulator did you use? Would be cool to add this to https://afterplay.io
Whats up with WizardLM-13B-V1.2? I don't know anything about it but the description says it's based on Llama-2 with only 13B parameters and it's holding it's own in the top 5 with a fraction of the model size.
I use the GPT4 API and still think it got neutered since I first started using it.
We should require software engineers to do the same. So much garbage code I've reviewed that would have easily been resolved had the SE just "asked an LLM".

Maybe we can legislate this into existence as well?
Write Code with AI
There are plenty of people outside of America that also act like this. It is a humanity problem.
If it's trained by humans is it safe to assume that we'll get it so something crazy like 99% agreeable?
What chance is there that anything will come of this grandstanding move?
Ohh. I misread this. I thought you meant auto-save the editor. Now my response seems glib. Absolutely -- I should at least warn people when they try to exit the drawing view.
Perhaps the range advertised should call out the variance, or use a more pessimistic number?

Much like MPG is denoted as city vs highway.
> would have happily repaired on my own if possible

I actually did that once. The claims adjuster was pretty surprised at the request, and she confirmed multiple times that I really wanted them to pay out less money (parts but no labor). Then she was like, "Well, I don't know why you'd want to, but it's your decision, so OK."

The reason: someone stole my stereo and, in the process, they destroyed several pieces of the dashboard. The insurance didn't cover my (aftermarket) stereo, just the dashboard.

I was going to install a replacement stereo myself. I had installed the other one (that was stolen), so I already knew how to do it, and I knew that stereo installation requires removing the same dashboard parts. If I'd let insurance pay a shop to do it, I would have needed to have them install the parts, then take it home and remove the same parts, install the stereo, and then put them back. Buying parts at the dealer is less work and takes less time.
There are quite a few parts on modern cars already that you cannot just replace on your own car with either a new or used replacement because before they will work, they require a "relearning" procedure that only the dealership computers can initiate and those computers have to be online, connected to the automaker's mothership when they do it.

So basically DRM on car repair/parts is already a thing.
> But I believe anonymous speech is important, and once you require age verification you necessarily sacrifice anonymity.

I agree with you here. It's not a problem that I think can be solved through legislation.

American law enforcement has proven that it'll collect data in a multitude of ways when needed contextually. They shouldn't be handed additional tools to do so. And I'm not talking about dragnet surveillance, I'm talking about the law creating tons of instances of E2EE getting in the way of "justice", which seems to be an increasingly-common problem, and that in turn being used to rationalize making E2EE illegal like it is in some other places already.
Is there really a significant number of folks who are confused by the idea that networks can serve different files under the same name at different times?
You misunderstood my intent, I'm saying that introducing these systems apparently produces a infosec threat significant enough to warrant federal legislation. In response to your post however I think we can dispense with the notion that folks backing into parked cars, light posts, etc, represents anything more than a nuisance to whoever owned the property that got backed into. Yeah it says "crash" in the writeup but we're not talking Michael Bay style 8 lanes of exploding cars here.
A lot more land will become arable, too. It might as well be a net plus, who knows. Africa already imports > 80% of its calories anyway.
If internet discussion is demographically and geographically skewed, I promise you it's not towards Europe... try being a non-American on the internet someday, while people are speaking about miles and states and seasons etc.
I gave one example - music streaming companies because I find it funny practically all of the dedicated ones are from the EU - and you interpret it as something to scoff at? Spotify is literally the biggest music and podcast streaming company, and among the first in the business.

Back Market, Doctolib, Ornikar, HelloFresh, GitPod, N26, Yubikey, Revolut have plenty of impact and innovation as startups.

But maybe market cap is what impact means for you, so okay - Airbus? VW? Stellantis? Alstom? Thales? Safran? Sanofi? Siemens? Robert Bosch? Bayer? Literally among the best in the world in their respective branches. For instance, Airbus is outselling and outengineering and outinnovating and outmarketing and out-everything Boeing. Did you know that apart from them not being criminally negligent with basic safety systems, they're also heavily investing in all sorts of alternatives for the future of aviation? They have projects for battery-electric and hydrogen-powered airplanes, delta-wing designs, and collaborate with engine manufacturers (to be fair, it's a French-American Joint Venture) on innovative engine designs. Meanwhile Boeing's only innovation is NASA giving them a ton of money for them to test a new wing design for them.

Only some big names I could think of in France and Germany (and Spain and Netherlands and UK for Airbus). I really should start a list that I keep up for next time this topic comes up, people regularly underestimate innovation in the EU, or are completely unaware that said innovative company is European.
There were no ice caps when primates evolved. I am excited to go back to the climate of my ancestors.
>I genuinely question how much you care about the success of your business

If you run a <50 person company, and you're bike-shedding about which chat program to use, I seriously question how much you care about your business.
I love in-depth evaluations like these. There are many people who want to question the status quo, just as there are many people who want to defend it, but discussions with data behind them are so much more compelling.

This discussion leaves open questions about how much the size of particulate emissions matter, how much of each size becomes airborne versus simply falling to the ground, et cetera. In other words, this makes for an excellent starting point for someone else to do some more research and improve the picture. That can't be said of most discussions.
The title is terrible and doesn’t refer to the actually interesting key point in the article!

The idea trying to be expressed is actually that the expansion of the universe is releasing energy, making the concept of “empty” space impossible as even the emptiest areas are still emitting energy.
Don't worry, I had a couple naps in there. "This seems to be running smoothly but it will take several more hours; I'll set my alarm to wake me up in two hours and have a nap" is part of why I didn't notice the second step was unnecessarily I/O bound.
The amount of ignorance in this comment is baffling.
Stated a little more politely, that was its original purpose, yes.
Most Honda models have a ridiculous reserve, something like 3.5 gallons. I still regret informing my mother of this fact...she never ran out of gas until I did.
"Thanks for being a beacon of light in the dark."

That's well put.

It makes me very happy to live in a world where tarsnap exists and is priced in picodollars.
Nah. Common sense isn't common, logical, or innate. It's important to communicate common sense, otherwise people just won't have it.

Those frameworks were created because those specific instances of common sense were exceedingly rare but still important. They were condensed into short lessons so people could read them, think for themselves about gains and loses, and adapt them to where they are needed.

The fact that leadership often can't do any of those 3 things right created an industry of fraudulent education teaching bureaucratic procedures. But that doesn't take anything from the original movements.
Can you please stop posting unsubstantive comments? It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
What a phenomenal landing page. Thanks to the animations I have a good idea of what this does and how it does it. You barely need to know what message queuing is to understand it.
> It had been traveling the same direction as us for like 20 minutes and when we passed through an intersection it just jerked hard left and I had to correct it manually.

Even if this and many other stories are just anecdotes, I could never imagine myself even testing this "auto-but-not-really-pilot" feature outside of a testing environment.

How do you folks dare to even try to use it? The risk is so big and the reward so tiny...
I was about to ask a similar question.

I don't know much about Linux networking. But recently I dove into it a little to let my laptop connect to my desktop via Ethernet (when present), but use Wifi for everything else.

I got it working-ish using "nmtui". But I'm left pretty confused about the relationship between all the network-related tools / services / files.

E.g., is "nmtui" just a convenience wrapper around thinks like iptables and resolved? Does it work around them? Which tools are mean to be used together, vs. which ones are redundant / incompatible? And then there's systemd as well.
I get that you just need a little juice to get to a real charger, but you'd probably need several 10's of kilowatts to get a decent charge in 10-20 minutes, and that's getting into fairly heavy equipment. No reason it wouldn't be somewhat feasible though.
> That's like saying "reading the future from chicken entrails is a skill".

If I could read the future from chicken entrails with as high a reply accuracy as I get from ChatGPT, then I would fully endorse that too.
> Is it...not just going into neutral via disconnecting a drive shaft?

Conceptually you are correct its like neutral, but almost no EV from any manufacturer has disconnecting drive shafts. Every Tesla model except the original roadster is locked in a single gear transmission that never disconnects - one of the big reasons EV drivetrains can be built so reliable with virtually no maintenance requirements (there is no service items on most EV drivetrains until a quick coolant flush in ~10th year of car's life span).

The Model 3/Y just dump the output of the rotor into a permanently locked 9:1 trans. There is no need for a reverse gear either as unlike a gas engine the electric motor can easily rotate in both directions.

An electric motor cant "stall" like a gas engine and generally never has to change gear, so there is usually no real benefit to fitting the cost and complexity of clutching driveshafts you typically need when you have a gearbox or gas engine.

Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but to best of my memory the only "mainstream" EV with a gearbox on sale today is the Porche Taycan/Audi E-Tron GT (they are both the same chasis/drivetrain underneath) with its pretty unusual 2-speed setup. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the next generation of that car eliminates the gearbox.
Coding Randomized Zelda Patterns
>Then the company goes well why are we paying for Slack when we have Teams?

To play the devil's advocate, that's the bean counters' job, no? Otherwise, whithout any oversight over finances, the expenses can easily spiral out of control and hurt the bottom line. Probably no big deal in the wealthy US where VC money is plentiful, but in Europe where start-ups need to be scrappy, it starts to add up.

As a consumer, I also ask myself, "well if I pay for Netflix, Prime, etc, can I just get rid of most of them and only keep one?"
Having dealt with ETL tooling that starts as "simple" and next thing you know is a few dedicated hires for what was supposed to be a simple pipeline, the phrase resonates a lot. If you've already built out a team to do this, tried multiple different tools, and then have something that just works I'd be all for it and it would have been just that to me frustrating to have gone down some other path first.

As a vision statement to me it resonates, now curious to give it a try and see if it fulfills on that vision.
How can you have no idea and assume it's Firefox users at the same time? Is that the joke?
It's very obvious that is disingenuous; they will use that as an excuse to make it palatable while planning to silently turn it off in a couple of years. Clearly it's a "foot in the door" technique similar to how Apple tried (but ultimately backed down) to introduce local scanning of all content on user devices (in the name of CSAM of course - a palatable scenario - which later opens the door for scanning anything a government entity dislikes).
Mainstream media is an ad platform so it's no surprise it's not discussed or addressed
> Wickard v. Filburn (which was overturned more than 25 years ago)

Please expand on this...

Are you talking about U.S. v Lopez? Just because some limit was found on the Commerce clause did not vacate the original decision.

I think the credit card fees would be subject to federal oversight but not the fundamental transaction facilitated.
I haven't gotten around to trying out Kagi, but I had the same experience with DuckDuckGo, and I haven't used Google search in enough years that I'm no longer sure of the number. Suits me just fine. At first, I would search on DDG and fall back to !g if I didn't find what I wanted, but I haven't bothered with that in a long time.
We know that isn't how things work.
regenerative braking is going to offset added weight of electric cars.

the article from the premise however specifically notes that it disregards pollution contributions of the impacts of EV on 1. powerplants to make the electricity and 2. mining and manufacturing of EV major components such a batteries.

While it's possible to scrub pollution from powerplants if you don't care about the cost of electricity you still have the much nore important issue of CO2 (G warming pollutant) which the article also does not address. Far more important than PM2.5 pollution imho, unless you're addressing just the cars within major metros like NYC, London, etc.

In this regard, point #1 is a major major negative mark when you compare EV versus a well designed gas powered hybrid. .
There were no nation-states at that time either. It's going to be a meatgrinder this time around.
> I didn't know he was one of its creators

This comment just made me feel old :-)
A reminder that HN is full of active google employees. They are here among us, and they are okay with implementing this.
They come up w/ the range under absolute perfect driving conditions that don't actually exist. The driving conditions should reflect normal driving conditions.
* Those hotkeys should work (follows Figma's example).
* A very high priority.
* Yeah... I plan to let people disable click (e.g. pointer-events: none) on elements, but automatically detecting transparent overlapping areas is a bit more work.
The title is a lie and the content of the article is hyberbolic. When the new requirement comes in it'll be the same as it is now for people who visit the US visa-free. The US has had this for years and Canada also has it for non-US citizens.
> the affiliate codes I'm fine with

I would be fine with it if it were opt-in for users who want to support the browser in that way, but silently injecting them across the board is just a scummy thing to do and also likely a violation of any sane affiliate program's terms. A company that's willing to do that loses an unrecoverable amount of credibility and trust in my eyes.
I'm a frequent traveler, but I've avoided Global Entry as a minor form of protest. The government doesn't need and shouldn't have my biometrics.

I've been reconsidering my position lately, as I've traveled places where biometric registration is compulsory, and the US surely has some deal in place to scoop up all that data.
The major threads so far:

Superconductor news: What’s claimed, and how strong the evidence seems to be - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36881808 - July 2023 (434 comments)

The first room-temperature ambient-pressure superconductor? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864624 - July 2023 (858 comments)
If people can't exercise their first amendment rights in or around police officers/offices, maybe police shouldn't be allowed their 2nd amendment rights, and only allowed non-lethal firearms. Many other countries do well with that limitation.