skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is really cool, I love the retro design.

If the devs are here, what does the tech stack look like?

What's the strategy for conflict resolution, i.e. two people edit the same area at the some time? Is that resolved on the server or on the client?

--

Edit: to somewhat answer my own question, it seems to be open source, client and server here: https://github.com/OurSources

Server is JS running on Node, need to dig deeper...
Actually, having integrity usually means being clear with people about budgetary decisions. The manipulative games just makes a firm look like its run by a cult of cons.

Talent cutbacks are a loss of invested resources, and signals a failure to predict market trends. Sure it can also bump a laggard stock short-term, but ultimately signals other internal structural issues.

Good luck, =)
As someone who knows more about words than superconductors, gentle correction in case it is an actual misunderstanding instead of misspeaking, but a correctly running MRI shouldn't ever CONSUME the liquid helium, it would recycle as much as possible.

But as a newly self-proclaimed expert on superconductors as well, yeah this would probably help MRIs. My understanding is that the reason for superconductors in MRIs is so that the wires doing the electricity stuff don't interfere with the small electrical responses from the tissue it's measuring. Without resistance, you don't get magnetic fields around the wires or something.
Lots of libertarians support unions, not sure where you get your info. The libertarian argument has the most subtlety about how and why to support or oppose certain unions. So yes, they do oppose some unions.
There is always low range broadcast I suppose.
Surprise surprise, this happened in the same year after fecebook acquired WhatsApp.
Text is a very high dimensional space, n-dimensional in fact. There is plenty of room for an AI to leave a fingerprint that can be detected in some ways but not others.

In fact it doesn't take much text to distinguish between two human beings. The humanly-obvious version is that someone that habitually speaks in one dialect and someone else in another must be separate, but even without such obvious tells humans separate themselves into characterizeable subsets of this space fairly quickly.

I'm skeptical about generalized AI versus human detection in the face of the fact that it is adversarial. But a constant, unmoving target of some specific AI in some particular mode would definitely be detectable; e.g., "ChatGPT's current default voice" would certainly be detectable, "ChatGPT when instructed to sound like Ernest Hemmingway" would be detectable, etc. I just question whether ChatGPT in general can be characterized.
Transformers.js.py: Transformers in Pyodide
Looks like you have a truly exciting task ahead. Hybrid clocks are a very interesting technology. Good luck!
its always pretty shocking to me how much things turn into this weird us v them mentality when its really just two different systems with plenty of pros and cons.

Every system could be improved and if you prefer one the other isn't by default inherently evil.

People within both systems can suck.
Here's the thing, though. You've used several key phrases in this comment: "a lot of questions and doubt," "wonder what other incidents [...] might happen in the future," and "major loss of trust."

All valid concerns, but why post about them on the internet? Especially when it's nothing concrete--you used the words "questions", "doubts", and "might happen"? If someone is taking the effort to post FUD (literally) about Mozilla and "trust", why the hell aren't they using that same effort to post about Google or Microsoft and "trust"? Aren't those obviously much bigger problems?

Again, it's not wrong, per se, but I feel like it's bordering on some kind of astroturfing for people to complain about the fucking Mr. Robot non-story that happened years ago when TFA is about Mozilla at least signalling the right thing while Google is trying to be overtly evil YET AGAIN. I can actually type "Fuck Google" faster than I can type "Mr. Robot", so I'd have to have some kind of weird agenda or priorities to bring up Firefox's Mr. Robot thing.
The Sagan standard is the adage that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” (a concept abbreviated as ECREE). But one can hope such evidence is forthcoming. And if it is, then short the oil majors.
If they want to overtake twitter or whatever it’s called now, they need a functioning search, the one thing twitter is still good at is searching for real time events.
That is my understanding, ONNX is the weights and the operators. You could then project that model into SPIR-V, Verilog or run it via native code.
Probably Yes, because NY is also warmer that it should be. It receives still part of this warm water before the current turns toward east, plus it has also a heath-island effect created by cars and houses.

So if you remove this effect for both Europe and US, NY should be much colder than it is currently (And most of Europe also).
I mean, modern washing machines use much less water and electricity, and leave the clothes less wet so the dryer has less to do. I’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they were less damaging to clothes as well.
This doesn’t need to be the case. It didn’t happen with Perl (CPAN) and Java (Maven), for example.
> Instead I use “appears in a credible journal” as a basis for trusting the apparent direction of travel

Using that is like using 'Someone raised a concern in a meeting' as a basis for believing something.

Anyone can raise a concern, or publish a paper. What matters is whether or not other people are convinced by the paper. Consensus.

Use 'scientific consensus' as your weather-vane. (PS. The scientific consensus on climate change is 'things aren't looking great, we need to turn the bus around, we aren't turning the bus around'.)

... Or go learn and become an expert in the field for yourself. It should only take ~20,000 hours of making a lot of mistakes along the way.
I don't know if it's me nor if the author is aware that in order to read the article I need to enshittificate myself with a medium account to proceed. Please Mr. Doctorow de-enshittificate yourself from Medium!
>If I know for a fact that a company is about to collapse and I establish a short position, will anybody notice? It depends on a lot of factors, but I could make an assload of money on puts without nudging the market.

Assuming you are the only person who knows for sure that this company will collapse, technical analysis is the wrong tool to use and all other strategies, experts, big money players will also fail.

Assuming you aren't the only person who knows for sure that this company will collapse the price will reflect this knowledge.

>It's much like trying to predict a fire by watching a crowd running away and hit the fire alarm. You didn't predict the fire and you can't have predicted the fire. Maybe you could have noticed one person booking it for the exit and follow along, but you still didn't know what was happening and were going on blind faith.

It's nothing like that at all, and reasoning with analogy is pointless because the discussion becomes about the analogy not the issue at hand. But I will try. If people running away is people selling stock, it doesn't matter if there is a fire or not. Selling stock impacts price regardless of if the event is real or not. And as you know, having been in a building where the fire alarm was activated, people don't rush to the exists. Some small number leave right away. The vast majority won't enter the building. The remaining people look to others and as more leave the momentum builds until the mass moves out.

And once the fire department arrives and gives the ok they will go back in. But since we are talking about stocks, not all buyers won't be waiting for that. They'll have put their money elsewhere, money may go back into the stock slowly. Obviously this won't work on the top 3 most popular stocks in a raging bull market that everyone is paying attention to. In that case, people will be waiting to jump back in.
I generally like the idea of keeping PRs small, but it can be difficult to do so, because I'm spending too much time waiting on code reviews.
Not the op but, I've seen this for lots of reasons.

Sometimes just a roll of the dice. Large companies tend to lay off more. If you've only worked in startups, it's very possible you may never be laid off. I've never been laid off despite working 20 years in industry.

Working in banks, FAGMAN, etc, you are much more likely to be laid off. I guess you could consider that high-risk, but those jobs are low-risk overall imo, because they pay a lot more than startups.
Right but the ability of you and many Americans to live in such low-density areas is fully supported by the massive amount of resources directed towards car-centric infrastructure. The problem you refer to- that public transit cannot service low density- is one which creates itself. Moreover, low-density means low tax revenue and infra is EXPENSIVE; more expensive in many cases than the low-density tax base can support. The net result is that revenue to build infra is generated in high-density areas and then spent on low-density ones, which weakens the public transit offerings in high-density areas and encourages more driving, which encourages more low-density living, and the cycle continues. This is not sustainable, and something will give eventually.
They're talking about using it for things like government benefits.

The moment they opened that can of worms, they're on the hook for making it serve, at the minimum, everyone that the current government mechanisms serve.

I'm using eyeless people as an example here, because it's the obvious case of people who can't possibly use Worldcoin even if they wanted to. The direct implication today is that blind people would lose their benefits under Worldcoin. If that's not true, then either.

1. Government doesn't actually need Worldcoin's ideas as much as Worldcoin hopes they do.

2. There are workarounds that don't require Worldcoin, in which case let's just use those in the first place.
This is the perspective of someone who doesn't understand how most people in the US live. Air travel is not affordable for many people.
My God, you're right. With such poor judgement, they might someday do something really awful like try to force remote attestation into the web at large.
These events caused major shifts in a very short time. Seems understandable that something so invasive as Covid and life-changing as work from home would be at the front of many people’s minds.
Does it apply to the turn indicators in a line of cars waiting to turn?
> With both RSV and influenza, infection as a baby or toddler seems to increase the likelihood of asthma in later life. Do we talk about asthma?

I think this reinforces my point succinctly. It’s not “extended RSV” or “persistent influenza”, it’s asthma.

COVID is a completely politicized term and dying on a hill to use it to describe symptoms people are stuck with after recovering from the acute disease, especially in a way that implies they’re still infected, is just - well you can see what it does.
There is hard empirical evidence. Plenty of scientific evidence now coming out as well given its been a few years to research initial cohorts. But to wait to verify scientific evidence is just foolish when this is affecting a grand scale of human beings.
It’s very easy to tell if it works. If you go to an interview with Goldman Sachs and mention that you are an expert in TA what would be their reaction?
The IPCC 1990 report predicted that sea level rise would abruptly accelerate from recent historic averages of 1-2mm/yr to 2-7mm/yr, and that is what happened. Satellite altimetry has tracked the central estimate of the 1990 IPCC predictions quite closely.
Capitalism contains the seeds of its own destruction. "the invisible hand" sounds good and all, but the problem is that if the owners of capital control the profits produced by the mobilization of capital, then money and power will inevitably become concentrated enough that those capitalists both benefit from and become capable of restricting market freedom. The idea that free markets are a stable state of affairs is a faulty assumption.

[edit to note: this is only one of the many internal contradictions of capitalism, but the most relevant to your argument imo]
>> Meeting your needs never will get easier, your loss function won’t allow it.

Loss function I had to look up. It's the gap between what you think will happen (your prediction model for your life), and what actually happens.
Gartner are so great at their job you think they own the concept of hype cycles and rage against them being mentioned while being the one to introduce them to the conversation in the first place :)
Ah, Go. I wrote a whole networking stack in it a few years back. I admit, I did get an incredible amount of performance from a very limited bit of hardware with it. However, it was dependency and module hell. Even the Go expert couldn't get it figured out enough to make it compile every time.

I'm really glad I got off that ride.
They could certainly keep a database of things generated by /their/ AI ...
I had one as a rental and I thought it's great. Right size, enough power, maybe the handling could a little better/sportier. We need more smaller, utilitarian cars instead of the ever bigger cars that are being sold.
Well done and thanks for sharing.
It's the same author, historian Bret Devereaux, better known for his geeky blog "A Collection of Unmitigated Pedantry" (acoup.blog)
This used to be downloadable on windows as a screensaver. Here is the gallery of images it made https://www.kurzweilcyberart.com/aaron/static.html

The windows screensaver itself can be found on Archive[1][2] and works fine on Windows 10.

The paintings it generates can not be exported as images directly if you didn't buy (which you can't now). Max you could do was take a screenshot. It creates up to 10 or 15 files describing the strokes though. I wrote a small JS tool which takes those files and redraws that paintings which you can then save/export with a click. https://github.com/SMUsamaShah/Kurzweil-CyberArt-AARON-Image...

1: https://archive.org/details/AARON-2-0-01420

2: https://archive.org/details/kurzweilcyberart_aaron
yeah, the AI hype cycle can be a bit tiring, but I'm glad you took a second look. What parts did you find interesting, in particular?
Sounds like you've got a very interesting weekend project coming up!
Cryptography cant save us here, people will figure out how to send AI images to the crypto hardware to get it signed in months. Just would be another similar layer of false security.
While you can construct a wide variety of applications in html (+javascript and css), you cannot do as well as a custom application for the task. Web is a great fallback for things you don't do often, but native applications are better for things you do all the time. Which is one reason everyone wants you to install their app on your phone (though most of them are not writing good apps either)
>Human this, Human that. LLMs aren't humans.

You said you trivially proved something and made up nonsensical lines of reasoning to justify it. If your "proof" can't port to Humans then it's not proof. You are just rambling.

>Humans make such mistakes precisely because they are not perfect reasoning machines.

Nobody is calling LLMs perfect reasoning machines. Your "point" was that they don't reason at all which of none of your ramblings has been able to "prove".

>If these LLMs are not, as I claim, reasoning on language rather than the abstract model of the query, then how come they fail miserably in exactly the ways you would expect where that the case?

They don't. The idea that you must make no mistake reasoning before you can be considered to be reasoning has no ground.

>LLMs generalize to non linguistic patterns.
Yes, congratulations, if you turn a problem into a linguistic one LLMs can deal with them.

Can you read ? Did you even bother looking at the link? LLMs don't need patterns to be linguistic to reason over them lol. None of those patterns are turned linguistic. Some of them are arbitrary numbers that resemble nothing like the data they've been trained on.
I'm not sure exaclty what he's talking about with Serde, in Go when you deserialize data into a struct it is strongly typed. It's not up to the dev to check that you received a string or an int.
or this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36854746
A rare counter-example to Betteridge's Law of Headlines!

(The answer is Yes)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
>Technical analysis is the ultimate dumbification of market structure and dynamics

Technical analysis is the macroeconomics (macroeconomics, the discipline taught in school etc) of the stock market! It’s like drawing aggregate demand and supply curves and imagining that they move around monolithically as they drive the economy. Tail wags the dog
His many devices rely on coduction, how many are thermally limited by efficencies?
But then that wouldn't be “detecting AI”, but merely recognizing an intentionally added fingerprint, which sounds far less attractive…
It can likely work in images where you can make subtle, human-undetectable tweaks across thousands/millions of pixels, each with many possible values.

Nearly impossible across data with a couple hundred characters and dozens to thousands of tokens.
Same, I like working in the office, but my quality of life and that of my family has drastically improved since moving to remote working.
Personally, I just use my instincts. If my instincts are wrong, well, there's always another lifeform that will evolve someday, even if that's billions of years from now.

Hopefully they will be smarter than myself. If not, a few billion more years and we may get another shot...
Intelligence has a pretty clear meaning. Of course you will have a hard time nailing down a definition but that's also true for simple words like "chair" or "car".

Artificial intelligence is also a pretty good name for a pretty clear concept: intelligence that has been artificially created. Any new ambiguity here comes from the ambiguity inherent in the word "artificial". Artifivial intelligence has a large range from if/else, linear regression and decision trees over ML methods to god-like superintelligence. That is not a problem, I think it's good that we have a term for this. I don't like when people try to reduce artificial intelligence to a smaller subset of these things. We should certainly come up with more precise terms in addition, but I think artificial intelligence is a very useful terminology and concept, not a marketing term.
As far as I understand it, this paper is about synchronization of oscillators, i.e. synchronization of (abstractions of) physical systems.

In this sense, I doubt that there is a direct application to distributed consensus, though it is possible that some insanely clever person might get an inspiration from this paper concerning how one could apply ideas that were used to come up with this proof

- to show how a specific type of protocol is able to reach consensus under weaker conditions

- to build a new type of algorithm for distributed consensus.
Oversimplified: HFT is essentially front running in disguise. It has a technical component but it's better to think of it as someone running ahead of you to be first in line at the counter of the bakery to buy the thing you want to be buying so there is a bigger chance you'll be buying it from them or so that the increase in price when you are buying it will allow them to sell it to someone else at a profit.

The main focus is on being able to outrun not just you, but also everybody else, hence the focus on latency. The next problem: which bakery to target first is where there is some analysis involved.
One must recognize that virtually every human action can be hyperbolically represented. That hyperbole will resonant with some people on its surface. Others, from a perspective of experience, knowledge, priorities: they will add a tolerance. Some will add a lot. Personally, none of what you’ve mentioned even causes me to pause. This is massively subject to information bias and philosophy. Some things are “ho-hum,” others are not.

But the approach of “I will speak for all of us and take the liberty of summarizing and manufacturing a consensus” is too far. I object. I bet the needle has barely moved, and if it has that’s largely because the media is flooding the zone on normies who never really cared anyway.
This is similar to or the same as "throw away the first thing you did" often this can be throw away the second, too, if you want.

I totally agree, and I work in a similar way. I find that the time I gain down the road drastically makes up for the time spent on the prototypes.

This doesn't apply to every problem, mind you - I only advise this type of working either if you really want to understand something, or if you have a good hunch it is going to be used for a while (or may be). One off scripts, there's not much gain - just get them working. Code that is part of a system, absolutely. It should be done this way. Throw it away - and maybe throw it away again.
App can Handle all ControlNet Models for Interior design
all Stable diffusion models in one place you only need to tweak the prompt that's it
It seems to have been published in a Korean journal: http://journal.kci.go.kr/jkcgct/archive/articleView?artiId=A...
I don't see how creating abstractions reduces the cognitive load. You create new concepts before you even need them + once you notice that the abstraction was wrong, now it's much harder to reverse.
Then the avg. Joe gets motion sickness and VR fails.
Very very poignant comment here.
If these scientists considered lab leak plausible that raises the question of why. I doubt it was just "feelings".

Also, "the Enlightenment was all about peer review" is an odd statement.
clocks and gps sensors can be hacked, there is no fundamental source of truth to fall back on here.

its as Sisyphean a task as AI detection.
No! *The "tech people" are not knights and never will be. The "knights" are upper management. The lords are the centimillionaires and up. The rest of us are slaves, peasants, maybe monks if we're "lucky".
Medicaid (see my answer below). I was shocked to find out I qualified given my income level in the past year, but since I made no money, it was free for my wife and kids and i had to pay a heavily subsidized rate for marketplace insurance, with no expected pay back now that my income is back to normal. I honestly think that the 'America has no social programs' trope that is often parroted by online personalities does a lot of harm in that it discourages people from applying. I applied originally as a joke to show my very fiscally-conservative mother that it is hard to get on to government welfare programs, but I was shocked at how easy it was.
Still not sold on seed oils: 8/10 Mysteries of Obesity explained.
This works fine if you're stacking/using TBD

My team does long-lived feature branches so tbh it's pretty hard to keep PRs small
Check github, I've open sourced my sass as have thousands of others. Look for a project related your niche. Saw a php gym manager sass the other day. So many unique projects are out there
One thing you can be 100% sure of: if someone has something that actually works they are going to keep dead quiet about it for as long as possible.
Immediately thought of "Joe Versus The Volcano" scene[1] where he is diagnosed with a brain cloud. "Phew. Brain Cloud!? I knew it!"

Close to a "brain fog" I guess.

[1] https://youtu.be/M77TmgZ540E
I don't see how the existence of one attack vector makes addressing another irrelevant.

To infiltrate an encrypted group chat like your scenario, the attacker needs to actually do social engineering work.
Actually Go does not suffer from that problem since it has a wide std lib, the original post took a liberate example of something that is not common.
> Why does everything has to be put into the political view?

BECAUSE THE FUTURE VIABILITY OF THE PLANET DEPENDS ON POLITICAL DECISIONS!