skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, I'm used to having unpopular opinions. So while I know that I will be crucified for saying this, I will say it anyway.

Stack Overflow absolutely _has_ to integrate AI if there is any chance of it continuing as a viable business. How do we know this? For starters, a massive portion of users have already stopped asking questions on Stack Overflow and switched to asking ChatGPT.

The situation with the moderators and politics and community interaction might have been botched. Maybe. But I suspect that there might not have been any way to shift direction without making the community extremely angry.

It's not human equivalent. But it can provide useful info and is getting better at a rapid pace. They did not have a choice about integrating AI deeply.

Part of this is people failing to understand the capabilities of the leading edge AI models and how that changes things.
Over the years, organizations look inward. Their products, features and practices become more self-serving and less user-serving. Design Thinking aims to flip people's mindset to re-focus on user needs over and above internal corporate needs. That's pretty much all there is to it.
Large teams need things beyond a merge queue, they need a merge graph: https://trunk.io/blog?post=trunk-merge
What's with "organic" in the title? The link doesn't mention anything about organic food, unless it's meant to be pedantic that food is organic matter.
> at least in the US, we've had a problem with executing people who may have been innocent.

thankfully Singapore doesn’t have this problem /s
> There are so many people out to get Tesla right now it's hard to process stories like these: the legacy auto makers, their supply chains, their unions, their dealers, the shorts, the elon haters, the ev haters, and on and on.
> There are also a ton of click bait faux outrage articles in general about every subject you can imagine.

I can’t help but be disheartened at the financialization (?) of everything. Can’t tell who’s real and who’s shorting.
I don't know the details of what you are planning.

But you do.

The fact that you are asking, suggests the details of what you plan seems at odds with what you know are the expectations of the HN community.

Good luck.
Obviously, I won't. That does cut out most of the web, though. Also, I doubt that only ad-driven sites will be doing this.
Do you think the shop should not sell something that some people want because other people don't like it? AFAIK the BAT token hasn't done any material harm to anyone besides maybe some speculators that bought at the peak
This will force fraudsters to build farms of "trusted" devices, with cameras pointing at the display with computer vision and simulated fingers clicking on the ads.
Stanford's website is apparently unable to explain it either: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/exec-ed/programs/design-thinkin...

Judging from the "participant profile", it sounds like the kind of thing you do when you have money to spend before the end of the year.
I am aware there are existing tools that handle encryption.

The tarsnap architecture still does more things.

You're welcome to feel that you don't need those things, but that wasn't my point.
Only if you open full screen. When you tile the window to a side it is no longer the case.

YMMV applies.
How much fonts did you play?
I think that's also why a pretty small kink in the can will make it tremendously easier to crush against your forehead as a party trick :-)

Or, more likely, it's a similar principle also at place in the design.
Chrome's issue was that you needed a computer with more RAM than normal home users had at the time.

It definitely wasn't better or faster after it forced your system to start heavily using a swap file on spinning rust storage.
The facts in your post are wrong. Insurance companies establish rigorous processes to steer repairs to the low cost provider and push that provider to make only necessary repairs. Policy holders might go along with it and might not, same as other insurance scenarios.
* ChatGPT 3.5. But it's also within spitting distance of GPT4, which is very exciting.
> There are so many people out to get Tesla right now it's hard to process stories like these

I have no dog in this fight. Never owned or thought about buying a Tesla. The details described in the story, if true, are very serious. Are you suggesting the story is made up?

I'm a firm believer in the idea that people can be brilliant in one way and dumb in many others. Elon seems hellbent on showing us all the ways he's dumb.
I should say that even if it doesn't affect them personally, it creates their worldview when it is 90% of their news. Homeless crisis, war in Ukraine. Why wouldn't you want and allow some positive, apolitical, hopeful story about noble science to consume your attention instead?
Browsers engines themselves use and fork underlying libraries. There is a lot of complexity that exists.
Let's narrow that down and say they wouldn't voluntarily. But you obviously never heard of that adversarial entity named IT Department.
You're right, I guess I don't know for certain that they're doing it, but they do enter information into a computer after looking at my ID...

Who knows!
Yep, but beware of anyone who makes criticism their identity. That's a mindset that predetermines perception.

As math consultant to "A Beautiful Mind" I waited six hours so Russell Crowe could ask me where to look when he declared that Jennifer Connelly's solution to the blackboard problem was wrong. He cared about details. Then Jennifer asked me if I was making her look like a yahoo. I explained that in testing a professor had given her answer.

Various people get wigged out that the young student in the late library scene was spouting math that was well known. Um, ever been a student? I'd made this same observation to Barry Mazur in the hallway as a student, and he just grinned, "It's all connected!" Meanwhile, no one addressed my partial proof of the Riemann Hypothesis that Nash had left on a board.

In the Harvard Lecture Hall scene, Nash compared space-time to the quaternions. Um, he was about to be institutionalized? I knew I had to use this line after the look Brian Greene gave me when I tried it on him. Still, it bothers critics.

Ron Howard found it helpful to think of the math as an actor. That was great direction for me.
I haven't had a chance to use the GPT-4 API yet - is it that much better than the GPT-4 available via ChatGPT? Or am I misunderstanding?
I mean it's not even the same basic elements. How much more of a dramatic change were you thinking?
its members are surveilled individually as i shared in the other pdf. please stop responding to me i'm not interested in your uninformed thoughts on how the terrorist watch list is toothless
Author here!

It's not satire, but it's definitely not serious :)

Like, I actually believe "do unforgettable work" is great advice.

But it's hard to get people to stop and consider what "unforgettable work" looks like.

Same with the other "productize yourself" stuff. I've been seeing a lot of it lately, and I thought it would be fun to make an over-the-top guide. Here's an example:

[0] https://www.productizeyourself.co

I guess I enjoy flirting with extreme beliefs, even if I'm not committed to them haha
Hope its satire...this is a great way to burn out...I've been there.
Yeah, my experience has been that every one of these freely downloadable models can be measured as "percent of chatgpt quality". and getting up to 85% is shockingly good.

*edit: oops, my brain inserted "by" in the middle of "outperformed chatgpt". I'll leave my wrong comment up as a testament to shame.
What would the internet have gotten "wrong"? It's a paper and now people will try to replicate it. Some informed people give their take on why it sounds right and/or wrong, but ultimately they aren't (and can't) verify or debunk it yet pending further investigations. I have zero expertise to give an opinion either way, and honestly the impact of room temperature/pressure superconductors just doesn't seem that overwhelming. Maybe more maglev trains?

As with many things now, there are that small set of people who need to pick a "position" early and then stake a part of their ego on it. Which is super weird and destructive, and underlies many of the bad tendencies of the web.
For me, that is what I would call "just bake something together", the YBCO way.

That said, I see now that I should have made this point clearer. See below for my comment with C60. That was a truly different approach (that failed).
This must be in regards to his donating $1,000 to Proposition 8, which sought to ban same-sex marriage in California [0]. This was the genesis event that led to his resignation from Mozilla back in 2014.

I'm unclear if his views have changed either positively or negatively in the intervening decade.

[0] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/03/gay-f...
Correct, see the github mirror[1]. I don't know how well supported that feature is compared to main branch. If it was completely stable, then it would have already landed in the main stable branch. Clarity about the roadmap of that branch would be nice.

Edit: maybe it's still being actively developed?

1. https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite/tree/begin-concurrent
> Allowing the development of a popular consensus that global warming is "bad enough to spray stuff into the sky to cool the earth down" would be absolutely catastrophic, since it would also reduce the window they have to exploit those resources.

Would it? The entire global economy runs on those resources. I think you're overestimating how willing governments and publics worldwide would be to accept "spray stuff into the sky to cool the earth down" over "change literally everything about how everyone lives everywhere," especially when the second one has a cost in lives much more easily measured (and propagandized!) than the first.
I wasn't in this country for most of the Bush years, so you'll have to tell me how it was. But if you ask me in general, focusing our attentions on our differences and pitting people against each other on racial boundaries isn't the way to make progress on the issue.

Is your point that I must be mistaken about race relations being better in the South than in coastal metropolises? Where I used to live, it was the kind of neighborhood with BLM signs on every other lawn, and approximately zero black people living there. Where I live now, there are approximately zero BLM signs on lawns, but plenty of people of different races living as neighbors, coworkers, friends, and lovers. Actual black people are moving back to the South[0], while champions of diversity are moving to less diverse places[1].

If that wasn't your point, please do tell.

[0]: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-new-great-migration-b...

[1]: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ssqu.13268
Sounds like you're an American who's either a Tesla employee or only owned American cars before. Their quality is mid-tier at best but the software appears to be so dangerous that I avoid driving behind/in front of a Tesla (in Europe).
Sorry, only simulators supported ;-)
Conceivably, though the power density of superconducting energy storage is very low and will likely remain low. It is currently used at grid-scale to smooth out power spikes, since they can charge/discharge their full capacity almost instantly.

> SMES is also used in utility applications. In northern Wisconsin, a string of distributed SMES units were deployed to enhance stability of a transmission loop. The transmission line is subject to large, sudden load changes due to the operation of a paper mill, with the potential for uncontrolled fluctuations and voltage collapse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energ...
> Each one of them has been the best car I've ever owned and better than the one before it.

If you buy a new car chances are it will be the best car you've ever owned and better than anything you've driven before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich#Appointment_to_CE...
US Growth Accelerates to 2.4% on Resilient Consumers, Companies
Rare, but sometimes people die going out on safari in sub-Saharan Africa reserves / game parks. no cite, just google away on this one.
Smart Data
Pretty much agree on criticisms of sloppiness. First off this is a preprint. More importantly, rushing to put a stake in the ground is reasonable in this case. if they are right 'instant Nobel' is just the half of it. The authors are guaranteed a place in the scientific pantheon.
I understand your point and it's quite true - but hard problems require adequate tools and I wouldn't choose Java, for example, non-crud stuff.
Locking (wheel) hubs could certainly be used to disconnect the wheels from whatever drivetrain trouble lurks within, but they come with a whole lot of compromises: cost, weight, complexity, space, etc. Standard industry practice for vehicles that can't be towed with only two wheels immobilized is (and has been for decades iiuc) to flatbed tow them, so Tesla isn't really going against the grain here. I think it's a fine choice.
But their point is we don't need a 100% complete scientific understanding of something in order to engineer it into something cool or useful.
I agree, it's a great browser and the BAT was at least an attempt to change some of the bad incentives of the modern web. Doesn't seem like it worked, but kudos for trying something new!
You can move it back to the top
Lack of cell signal is still a problem in some parts of the U.S. I can think of a few places within a couple hundred miles where I can drive 45 minutes or so without any signal. It's also an area where triple digit temperatures are common in the summer.
Or you just make it cultural like Japan.
It looks like ChatGPT length is 827 while LLaMA2 length is more than double at 1790.

Disclaimer from the site:

> Caution: GPT-4 may favor models with longer outputs and/or those that were fine-tuned on GPT-4 outputs.

> While AlpacaEval provides a useful comparison of model capabilities in following instructions, it is not a comprehensive or gold-standard evaluation of model abilities. For one, as detailed in the AlpacaFarm paper, the auto annotator winrates are correlated with length.
The way I see it, Design Thinking is an idea is older than Agile, and has followed a similarly problematic evolution. At the core of both, there are a number of insightful and meaningful observations about how to approach difficult problems, and both offer some useful tools. But once both ideas got into the wild, people just mutated them until they were barely recognizable, made them incomplete and, okay, absurd. Consultants took them over and turned them into products: got a dysfunctional engineering team? Just add Agile. Need creativity? Sprinkle some Design Thinking on it. That's just what people do.

But I work in an organization that is still building its product side, and this stuff is not obvious to them. I talk to a lot of smart people who don't know that you should build small things and iterate on them. I meet a lot of people who don't think to question the assumptions of the problem statement. I assumed all this stuff was natural, because I came here from tech startups, where it's been in the air for twenty or thirty years. But, it turns out it's not all obvious, it has to be taught. I guess that, whatever faults they have, Agile and Design Thinking have nudged a lot of people in the right direction, when nothing else is apparently doing that.
Kind of interesting to think about relating this to the ongoing UAP hearings, where it's alleged that private government contractors overbill for projects and funnel the extra money to the UAP programs. Boeing has been mentioned by name a few times.
I apologize if I came across as insinuating it was an error, I was just asking you for your assessment of the chances it could be an error.

I'm not well versed in the subtleties of physics experiment measurement, so I figured I'd ask. It's difficult for a layperson to determine which "side" is right when battle lines are drawn after these types of announcements.
Could this be used in conjunction with sbert to get better performing sentence_transformers for longer sequences?
Documents actually never get uploaded! PDF text extraction happens on the client using a web worker and MuPDF compiled to WASM.

1. PDF parsed and chunked on the client

2. Sparse vectors are regenerated for the entire document corpus and the existing vectors are updated

3. Dense vectors are generated for the new text and upserted along with the new sparse values

The original documents stay on your device.
According to this article, due to bad pipes Thames Water leaks up to "250 Olympic-sized swimming pools" worth of water every day. That's 625 Million liters, compared to the 1-5 Million liters these data centers use daily.

I still think that much water for a data center is crazy (why wouldn't they use some form of closed-loop cooling? Or do they and they need 1-5M liters to top it off? Just seems excessive to me but I also don't know much about how data center cooling works.
I think there are many factors for this. I'm not sure which year you picked up for the 100k numer, but it sounds insane. Are you sure this is correct? In the entire EU (comparable population to US) there are approximately 6k overdose deaths per year(5800 in 2020). In one member state Poland (I'm picking it as its my country, not because of any better/worse rate) it's around 240 people annually (2006-2016). That's 0.6 per 100k people. Half that you quote for Singapore and we have no death penalty.

I suspect there must be something else at play here. Perhaps they (Singapore and USA) count all drugs like Tylenol/Paracetamol and EU/Poland only counts illicit drugs. I can't believe there would be such a huge difference unless there is a mistake in data somewhere.
> porn harms people like water harms people

My analogy is that water is fine until it's used in excess or in the wrong contexts. I dislike your use of "only" trying to restrict the reach of the analogy, though. Everything you described isn't related to porn, it's related to the porn industry. What you're really criticizing here is corporatism, not porn.
This story deserves no more attention than the 10,000 crank papers submitted to Arxiv every day about time travel, prime numbers, antigravity. There is nothing worth replicating. That's what they got wrong.
It's more complicated.

“Those who consume plant-based milk alternatives lower in these target minerals should seek to obtain these nutrients through other foods or beverages,” says Redan.

“All of those nutrients can be obtained from other sources, such as nuts, seeds and lentils,” says Clare Thornton-Wood, a spokesperson for the British Dietetic Association.

--

High milk consumption linked to higher mortality, hip fractures

https://health.clevelandclinic.org/can-drinking-too-much-mil...

Milk (Yes, milk) and Parkinson’s disease

https://scienceofparkinsons.com/2016/12/07/milk-yes-milk-and...

Exposure to exogenous estrogen through intake of commercial milk produced from pregnant cows

Estrogens in milk were absorbed, and gonadotropin secretion was suppressed, followed by a decrease in testosterone secretion. Sexual maturation of prepubertal children could be affected by the ordinary intake of cow milk.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19496976/

Microplastics detected in meat, milk and blood of farm animals

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jul/08/micropla...

Meat and Dairy Subsidies Make America Sick

https://www.pcrm.org/news/blog/meat-and-dairy-subsidies-make...

20 meat and dairy firms emit more greenhouse gas than Germany, Britain or France

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/07/20-meat-...

The Colorado River is going dry ... to feed cows.

https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/23655640/colorado-river-wa...

Environmental footprints of dairy and plant-based milks

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/environmental-footprint-m...
You may want to edit this, unless you see an upside to "drastically reduced savings."
I doubt it. Even Tesla superfans trash the M3 publicly. It's cheap for a reason
No. EPA has 2 different processes and the car maker can choice what they want to use.
This is difficult because there is no spoon.
The point is that "as designed" was really "designed to mislead" aka "lying", and they got caught red-handed.
I used to work for a company that makes CAD software for architects.

Quite a lot of our customers and potential customers that I'd bump into at conferences and the like were insufferable. They think of themselves as "designers" not "architects", and they wore black turtlenecks and talk about Changing the World through the power of Design. It's like a cult. No one can talk specifics, no one can point to a design that will change the world, just Design in general, and they even have their little uniforms.

I had to sit through so many goddamn talks about Design Thinking and how it's Revolutionizing Everything.

Three years in that job and I still don't have a clue was Design Thinking is. It reminds me more than anything of those useless "collaboration frameworks" that HR keeps coming up with.
Or because all of those popular games are manipulative and their goal is not to make you happy or fulfilled, but to frustrate you so you play more.

Those games are frustrating on purpose.
1. You did find a tweet that claimed 100 trillion parameters, as the GP post did.

2. The video mentions he saw _a_ tweet about GPT...and actually we don't even know what the tweet said, the moderator never finished their question.

3. I'm not sure what sort of claim "connected" is, other than unfalsifiable, like all of the confirmation bias motivated arguing on this topic. People do know Geohot's name and Pytorch is an open source ML framework, neither of which make them likely venues to know a closely kept trade secret of Open AI's. (and as we show in the rest of this post, they were parroting claims made months earlier, I'm showing you through March '23, Geohot didn't get around to repeating it until June!)

Recentering: it's not a mixture of experts model, no matter if people claimed 1 trillion, 100 trillion or both. (btw, easy proof of the extensive 1 trillion claims: innumerable, all in 2022: https://twitter.com/search?q=until%3A2022-12-31%20since%3A20...)

Now: let's say a reader just can't let go of the fact some people also made 100 trillion claims, but I said most people made 1 trillion claims. I'm not sure what to say, because I never claimed no one made 100 trillion claims as well, so I'm not sure how to give those people peace so we can talk mixture of experts. I guess apologize? I'm sorry.

Now we can definitely focus on mixture of experts.

Here's innumerable claims between Jan 1st 2023 and March 31st 2023 that GPT4 was a 1 trillion mixture of experts model, as I claimed: [https://www.google.com/search?q=mixture+of+experts+trillion+.... [/r/MachineLearning](https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/121q6nk/n_...) [the-decoder](https://the-decoder.com/gpt-4-has-a-trillion-parameters/) [rando boards](https://www.futuretimeline.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=31145)
"I like X, therefore any negative information about X is lies propagated by their enemies" is a dangerous position to take.
You crashed?

https://i.imgur.com/LriOYog.png
Whoa Jeff is in the comments section holy jesus. Love your stuff man keep on keepin on and enjoy!
Show HN: Switch from live to mock in seconds with Mocker
Just to clarify, these are not serializable transactions, they're snapshot isolation. The serialization this document talks about refers to BEGIN CONCURRENT allowing multiple writing transactions to co-exist, but COMMITs do not happen in parallel; at any given point in time only one COMMIT can be in-progress. Hence, serialized.
Llama2 beat ChatGPT 3.5 with a 92.66% win rate to 89.37%, but lost to GPT-4 which got 95.28%. Still pretty amazing though!