skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
***** FINAL CONCLUSION *****

First of all, I would like to thank everyone here and on Reddit who researched and provided references for their efforts and contributions.

Here is the summary of the findings as they stand today:

1) The term "object-oriented" was known and used throughout the sixties and seventies in various domains, such as developmental psychology, library and information science, and systems engineering.

2) The term was also used in computer science, at least since 1971, e.g. applied to database systems, operating systems, structured exception handling and structured analysis; see e.g. https://archive.org/details/databasesystems0000cour.

3) The term "object-oriented" was applied to a programming language for the first time in the MIT CSG Memo 137 (April 1976) by Anita K. Jones and Barbara H. Liskov; a similar text was published in the IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering later in the year (see see https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1702384).

This is an amazing result and sheds new light on the history of object-oriented programming terminology.

If you want to have a look at the references and discussions yourself, see the comments here and on Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/156ng....
Super Rare Arcade Machine Worth Thousands Saved from Dump
> Digital audio killed the industry. Why buy an album when you can...

As someone that jumped on the Napster and, to a lesser extent, Limewire and Kazaa bandwagon, their value for me wasn't so much that I could get something for free that cost money at the local record store, but it was stuff that couldn't get at all at my local record store.

That said, and much later on, the ability to legitimately listen to music on-demand via Spotify and its ilk pretty much ended my trips to the store.
> Frankly, I think if people won't hire because of a post like this, then the interviewers are the one contributing to the problem.

Totally disagree. For the vast majority of software dev jobs (like 98% of them), you just want someone who shows up and does the work without making much of a fuss. People who openly demonstrate that they are difficult to work with are freely signaling "do not hire me, I will make your life much harder"

Why would you hire someone like that? You'd much rather have someone who is 50% as skilled but gets along with everyone and doesn't make other's lives harder because of their personality
so basically what we have is a broken software update that Netlify won’t look at because they point and say there is no SLA for free tiers

so we can blame the initial thing on incompetence over malice, but then the second thing over incompetent malice because some support staffer can’t act like a human with empathy
People give up ownership in the hopes of a reciprocal relationship, even an unbalanced one.

Grabbing the X account just feels petty.

These are made up user accounts, you can just make two X accounts with different IDs in the database. It's not like real estate where the locations are bound by the laws of physics.

And it's Elon's modus operandi. He screwed over his relations with the tesla founder in similar fashion.

He really would benefit from hanging out with Gaben and spend less time courting controversy.
I'm forced to wear pants in public at all times. If I showed up to Thanksgiving with no pants, they'd ask me to leave and id never get invited again. Tyranny ! Everyone should be free to endanger everyone around them with a deadly crippling virus at all times.
Good luck convincing corporate lawyers that the license terms don't matter since we're just using it for linking. I don't know many (any?) that would risk it.
I'm already infamous for my personal opinions in the tech world. Will removing he personal posts and putting them on a separate blog really work? (I do already have a domain.)

I'm not so sure it would work. By the time I thought about it, I had already gone viral on HN and the personal attacks had started.
Port forwarding is also very useful: https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/ssh

It allows me to rent a cheap cloud machine, build and test code there instead of upgrading my laptop.
I like the anonymity. No blue ticks, no avatars, no verified profiles. No avatar or even colors to recognize someone. And yet most aren't fully anonymous - you could find them on github or linkedin somewhere.

So people are usually judged on what was said than who said it.

Some are pretty subtle. Sam Altman is just "sama" on this site and often trolls threads about his company.

So unlike places like Reddit, people can be a little reserved about dunking on others or BSing too much. You often see people getting called out for trying to explain how something works to the person who wrote the manual on the thing.
I didn't compare or realize that. So if you are right and most probably you are, I suppose I am not that interested in that sharpness.
The launch of Napster in 1999 is the most likely explanation for the massive drop in CD sales starting in 1999. Do you have any alternative explanation?
Any tips for getting one off ebay without getting screwed? I want to pull the trigger, but a bit scared.
The important thing is getting even mildly drunk, even once only, before you are confident driving. 5 years as in the US are way too much as you will confidently drive drunk without understanding the effect.

In other countries you will probably be drunk for the first time around the time you're taking driving lessons, or earlier.
I get it. They have an issue tracker full of bugs. Most companies just ignore it or don’t have one at all, but they seem to have dedicated staff who manage it. I imagine that they just prioritize at some level based on what competition is doing.
Shouldn't they then be legally liable?
The reason that desktop world existed is because computing was very localized.

Now people use it in very interconnected ways.
I’ve spent nearly twenty years blogging, giving talks and releasing open source code. [...] I’ve interviewed hundreds of people [...] The vast majority of candidates have little to no evidence of creativity in public at all

Are we sure the author is not showing some unconscious bias by looking in others for traits he has (public creativity)?

There is no particular reason why public creativity is linked to good engineers. It's one way to show good engineering, sure. But far from the only way. I could see some other hiring managers arguing the opposite: if you have time to write lightweight tech posts on your blogs, maybe you are not a great engineer who will solve my company's most difficult problems.

That being said, especially for new grads, I strongly recommend showing something, anything beyond "I graduated from this university and here are the classes I took".
I agree.

As this comment said: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36858774 and I glossed over in "two different ways that have different tradeoffs", the data vs codata approach gives you orthogonal extensibility. (Note the original article didn't talk about extensibility at all.)

In a DSL context you usually want new transformations (debuggers, pretty printers, etc.) on a fixed language. For this the FP / data approach is ideal.

In some cases you want fixed transformations on an extensible language. An example is a visualization DSL. There are limitless visualizations but the operation you want to use on them is always the same: draw it. For this the OOP / codata approach is ideal.

So choose the implementation technique that best suits your problem domain (and your implementation language.)
This type of dismissive attitude is indicative of the stigma that has followed these types of disclosure attempts across the years, and if you were familiar with the three people being interviewed right now, you would realize their credentials supersede yours and are worth being listened to with an open mind.
Reminds me of Homer Simpson getting bought out by Bill Gates.

Gates: “Buy him out boys”

Gate’s goon trash Homers office

Homer: “What is going on”

Gates: “I didn’t get rich writing a lot of checks”

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H27rfr59RiE
I'm a bit surprised that Norway would be so far behind your county, but regardless it seems like the shipping company is acting prudently given Norway's lack of readiness.
I don't think I have enough work experience. But thank you for the link.
Elon is the controlling owner. There's nothing much the investors can do. They took the risk when they invested with Elon.
I have another level of blocking : AdGuard Home. I know that there is no optimal solution. I do the best I can with what I have.
In that case I would stand corrected.

May I ask, does the New Architecture and Fabric not solve this problem?
To be fair, that twitter context post is almost entirely useless.

Comparing the risk of myocarditis from vaccines to the risk of myocarditis from actually getting covid is not a helpful comparison.

Generally speaking, everyone is going to get covid whether you are vaxxed or unvaxxed. So the question is whether adding vaccines into the mix REDUCES the overall myocarditis risk or increases it.

In other words

(Covid infection myocarditis risk + vaccine myocarditis risk) VS (covid infection myocarditis risk)

From https://www.heart.org/en/news/2022/08/22/covid-19-infection-...

"But the risk of myocarditis associated with the vaccine was lower than the risk associated with COVID-19 infection before or after vaccination – with one exception. Men under 40 who received a second dose of the Moderna vaccine had a higher risk of myocarditis following vaccination. The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines are available in the U.S."

Unless I am horribly misreading this, it seems that

(Covid infection + non-moderna vaccine), has a lower risk of myocarditis than (covid infection + no vaccine)

EXCEPT in men under 40 receiving moderna.

In that case, (covid infection + moderna), has a HIGHER risk than (covid infection + no vaccine)

Can anyone correct me if I am reading this wrong?
Seems like a reasonable guess if you assume most or all of the paying customers are companies, but that might be unrealistic to assume, and individual consumer behavior has been studied a lot; it’s widely known in retail business that people often don’t value free things. The relationship between price and product engagement is complicated. Having run a site myself that offered a free tier and a paid tier, I experienced exactly the same thing: free customers were noticeably more demanding and less patient than the paying customers. Initially I sold paid plans almost entirely to individuals, not companies, and still saw this behavior. So my guess is that people who invest financially in their tools are willing to work to improve them, hence interested in having a polite and productive relationship with the company that makes their tools. Free users want the product to work right now, and because they’re not paying, they don’t expect it to change. There might be a bit of free users acting more aggressively out of fear that they won’t be listened to because they’re on the free tier, and hoping that public shaming, instead of money, will get the company to act. At least that what it feels like on the support end of this.
I just donate to the Mozilla Foundation each month: https://donate.mozilla.org/en-US/

I feel like they could do better, but on the whole, I'm happy with what they provide to everyone for free.
I think we're in agreement on that point. It may go even further though, and I suspect the act of paying someone poor wages in of itself leads to perceiving them as property.
It’s something to distract from something else.
Not easy. The vehicle decks on ferries can't be tightly sealed off. Modern ferries often have CO2 fire extinguisher systems fitted but those have limited capacity and the fire can reflash quickly when the oxygen level rises again.
I almost never see meaningful detail regarding what is collected and what it’s used for. Is Google’s collection equivalent to Brave’s, or to Firefox’s? I’d be very surprised if there were not significant differences between what is collected here. Comments like this draw a false equivalence between the three.
Getting some "PLEASE DRINK VERIFICATION CAN" vibes...

https://imgur.com/dgGvgKF
But we are talking about a car on a boat. Will your fire department be able to put out a lithium fire on a boat?
I've seen in the neighborhood of dozens of thousands of times on the high end

For anyone interested in seeing this on the nearest Linux box:

vmstat -S M 1

Watch the 'cs' column go wild
I still cannot get over Michael Phelps' 8 gold medals in 2008 Beijing Olympics
There were doctors rubber stamping denials too.

The US system is bad. The problem is that healthy people don't care and sick people are less likely to have the means to battle private corporations. So, it is better for the {evil corp} to get sued every so many years and pay some fines vs paying for the care.
Firefox mobile on Android, ublock origin and darkreader installed. No lag on guardian articles on a pixel 6a.
Serious people are also known to have, from time to time, agendas that steer them away from truth for ulterior motives.

The laws of physics tell us that if is highly improbable for intergalactic intelligence to be able to visit us. Else we need a plausible explanation.
Traditional T9: a T9 Keyboard for Android – open-source with word prediction
If all else fails, I'd consider that option.

But the problem seems to be more of how to get a burning car out of the pile of cars in your ferry. Doesn't matter if EV or not, you want to have it out of there at some point and that seems to be tricky.
> there's nothing inherent to them that would prevent them from being made perfect, finished and never updated again.

theres this thing called the internet, to which the OS connects, filled with adversarial actors, so no this is not correct at all
> only if it talks to the internet

So.... Most software.

Agreed
The cmake build prints that it finds cuda when I run the cmakelists (prints the location of cuda headers), however I dont see any noticeable difference between cpu-only and cuda builds. So if its not working then maybe there a CLI option thats required, or maybe cuda support is broken on windows
Zero evidence? We’re using his history of being a little bitch boy to assume he removed it. It’s not that far of a stretch.
Andrew Gelman is truly our Vladimir Lenin
I started recovering after 2.5 years so even if things look hopeless, they might not be.
I wonder what Google's version of "prima nocta" will look like.
There are different ways to measure complexity:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.0067...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281146/

Modern music is less harmonically complex than even early Beatles, who used more chords (and more chord progressions) than are used today. Music today is highly repetitive.

Timbre is also less complex thanks in part to the use of virtual instruments and sample packs. Synthesized sounds and samples are intrinsically less complex than sounds recorded in a room. Any two hits of, say, a hi-hat will yield different waveforms and our brains pick up on these micro variations.
You haven't presented contradictory evidence, you've presented garbage con-man scribblings dressed up as contradictory evidence.

The fact that I'm capable of seeing that and you aren't is what folks ought to glean from this conversation.
Why would I pay my developers to do bug fixes if you've only paid me once? Bug fixes are the user's problem, so why should I have to pay for it?
Hardly. I think most people see that there just isn't any evidence without better physical explanations and that the premise is shaky in the first place. The cynical attitude you echo doesn't get much play because it is incoherent, and I've literally never seen the ridicule you speak of. In other contexts I have seen people with deboned arguments later summarize the experience as being told they were stupid but that was clearly the emotional reality and not in any way connected to a sequence of events.

Part of treating a matter in good faith is understanding when your position is at the very least highly unlikely, or purely speculative. It is not a code word that means other people must treat you as having a good argument, more like they must treat you seriously - and some arguments presented in seriousness are not worth much more than a brusque dismissal.
i find this comment a bit funny given that you use googletagmanager on your website :)
But without monetization, YouTube would have also long ceased to exist.
What do you consider a successful jailbreak?
> otherwise it'll become obsolete within couple of years

I mean, sure, this is what all the software developers have been saying...

In the meantime, I'm constantly seeing users, even here on HN, complaining about how their favorite software tools are changing. Users the world over annoyed at SaaS, and pining for installable software that they can just put on a machine and never have to worry about forced upgrades or annual maintenance fees, etc., or even the convenience of not needing an internet connection for it to work.

The software world has never been black and white. There are product niches, and also use-case niches. You could probably make a good business by choosing something that's only available as SaaS and releasing a local-only version of it.
Hostels!
Next, we would like to welcome the witness from planet Zorg in the Snoom system. We hope the air here is to the witness’s liking.
One of the best ways for me to understand a candidate in an interview process OR a prospective lead that I'm reporting to (be it CEO, CTO, VPE) if I'm on the other end is to see how they think and how they interact with a community.

Whether that's through a blog, through their socials, LinkedIn posts, through their YouTube, through their GitHub - I review all of it; anything I can find. I want to see how they communicate, how they think, how they comment their code (or don't), their view points on various touchy subjects in software engineering and system design.

It's basic background research. Why suffer through a relationship that isn't going to work out for either party if some basic digging can short circuit that problem? It also provides great context for an interview and points of discussion that help connect with the other party.
> Child services people who turn a blind eye to abuse and let kids die because it's too much work to deal with it.

Because child services is critically underfunded and poverty is rampaging through our country. The richest one on earth.

> Your neighbors who assault and beat their kids.

Yes, more monsters, but not on the scale of someone who enslaves children and adults en-masse in foreign countries in order to suppress wages in their own country.

> Those people are your neighbors...unlike the billionaires that people harp on about.

Not unlike each other at all. They are the same narcissists and psychopaths, just with less power.
Removing it on Musk's orders wouldn't be foul play anyway. He owns the business. He can decide how it operates, including preferential treatment for himself.
A solution looking for a problem.
Watch out for righteous anger. It's like candy.
This was an inspirational story!

I was born and raised in Pakistan where it’s already tough to get into tech as a woman despite not having a Taliban government.

It’s crazy that like being a doctor is socially acceptable and becoming a developer isn’t?!
Using Swift UI, or UIKit, has its own quirks. And then you need to shift mental gears with entirely different UI component paradigms.

I find most people making this argument haven't worked full time with one or the other.

If you're a larger company who can afford two teams/groups, or if you are working on something lower level like OpenGL or ML, it makes sense.

Having done both for multiple years, I can't understand when people think it would be faster to build separate apps. It's not even remotely close. You're swapping out doing bug fixes, platform specifics like push notifications, the occasional separate UI implementation, and distribution twice with doing _everything_ twice.
Chinchilla’s Death
My expectation is that private is worse for any public involvement in any discussion because nobody else can see it, and also likely to get them yelled at more via other channels, and also lead to the assumption that they "have something to hide".
I have a pet conspiracy theory that some of this nascent AI tech isn’t actually from here. Like sure, there are researchers who came up with transformers, deep learning, and so on, but who’s to say they didn’t get a little help.
I actively despise google and avoid any product they make (except youtube, got no choice there) for this reason.

It goes back all the way 2010, I remember opening up chrome to try it, right clicking on a youtube channel background to attempt to download like I could on firefox just fine, and it not having the option, why would you go out of your way to restrict a user easily being able to right click and download? well, because you believe you own the web.

Never used Chrome and never will, if you use Chrome you are actively making it worse for yourself in the future once they implement enough bad policies that it becomes near impossible for almost anyone or anyone to bypass their restrictions.
seL4 is a formally verified OS kernel. https://sel4.systems/About/
Facts are poisonous for people who follow the GOP.
That's somewhat ridiculous if that is the reality. All of CD manufacturing, shipping, retail overhead is eliminated in streaming. In reality streaming should produce more money for talent, eliminate overhead, and put more pressure on recording companies profit margins.

The height of the CD was ludicrous. A CD cost 15-20$ in the mid nineties, and cassettes, a more expensive and complicated medium, were half of that.

So a lot of the collapse isn't EVIL PIRATES, it is that the industry was sitting on a massive monopoly and cash printing machine, and digital collapsed that profit margin.

Music production used to require million dollar+ recording studios that the labels had a semi-monopoly on. Even in the 1990s, you could get usable recording equipment and software from a PC and Microsoft Windows.

Radio payola is mostly the last gasp of label control, although that seems to be going strong.

The REAL killer of music revenue is the rise of video games and way more television/video accessibility. First of all, there isn't one TV in the home like it was up to the 1990s. TVs are cheap, and smartphones are ubiquitous. Video games. tiktoks/youtubes, and TV dominate the media of the youth, and music is a peripheral/decorative aspect of those.

Essentially music filled the world of bored teenagers once upon a time, but boredom has been destroyed in the modern world (replaced with media saturation ennui).
I think that when people say something is "unethical", what they mean is that thing is not compatible with their ethical code. That's the criteria they're using.

> it usually seems equivalent to “mean”.

Isn't it possible that being "mean" is against their ethical code?
Why would it be a state secret if the US (or any other) government had encountered aliens? It doesn't seem like something that would need to be kept secret.
Maybe there is no conspiracy and the note is just wrong.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/...
ATS systems are why I don't bother crafting a 1 page resume. I certainly make page 1 as compelling as possible, but I make sure that my past years of experience are also well cataloged, since I need to make it past the ATS to even get to the point where a 1 page resume is even a factor.
Have you seen bank "login redirects" when the system redirects you for ca. 5-10 times before actually letting you in? This proposal could be defeated in the same way: after successful authn, the user is redirected to the page '/wei_chk_1', then '/wei_chk_2' and so on until '/wei_chk_$n', e.g. 10 or WEI check success. If the WEI Javascript check succeeded on at least one page, you are logged in. Otherwise, get lost.