skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Pretty much. It's one 500ish line file that's super easy to parse. 50ish lines is declaring the data structs, 100ish lines is some boilerplate for allocating and deallocating those structs. There are also no dependencies (which should tell you something when remembering that C is not a batteries included language).
Hmm, very interesting - your link to the bill's text is specifically missing the section about being "deliberately blind" to misuse (it's the 4th bullet point from this tweet, https://twitter.com/JakeLaperruque/status/167888722551627776...), and that's what people are so concerned about.

Perhaps the bill has already been updated? Or maybe the offending 4th bullet point was added later?
More likely? You’re conditioned to not pay attention to thirst, and to need lots of sugar and the like to drink something. I bet if you went a couple weeks without soda and drank more water, you’d probably find the water tasty and not drink any more soda for awhile.
sysupgrade was released with OpenBSD 6.6. I think my wildest upgrade was going from 6.8 to current (7.3), so 5 releases without a hitch. Granted the box was mostly just base anyways. Always remember to "pkg_add -u" after every release.
https://flowch.ai (our project) does this and is currently free to use. It doesn't train a custom model but it gets good results.

A simple way to do this is to upload your files (PDFs, Wod docs, virtually any type is supported), then generate reports using prompts based on those uploaded files. You can go from uploading to results in around a minute.

I've had good results uploading a bunch of documents, then running the same prompt on each of the documents with a few clicks using the "Flow Reports" feature.

We're working on lots of stuff on top of this, like scheduled reports (daily summaries / analysis / newsletters) and automated web scraping and data upload.

Here's an example using a BBC News article that I just uploaded to FlowChai (prompt: summarize in 200 words):

https://flowch.ai/shared/3c6d6ead-3ebc-4190-a143-ffeee81945a...
Human growth slows down fairly quickly.

Getting started on building a Dyson swarm of power satellites is already very possible, if we were to put say 50% of world GDP into it. They don't need to be any more high tech than what we already have, just more of it, lots more.

Of course, that's economically infeasible at the moment. But as we grow GDP everything becomes more feasible.
Except that isn't what's happened here. What's been published in this case, to use your example, is akin to someone saying "If you use this particular format in john, you can identify 4chan users." Nobody who knows what they're talking about has ever considered anything like that egregious; what's egregious is the idiotic self-rolled crypto that these researchers have exposed by doing so.
Three new atlases reveal a new dimension of the human body
No, when he wrote up the contract it was at around $44b. The actual purchase was months later.
What type of life forms do you think will prevail ?
Biden administration is tackling smart devices with a new cybersecurity label
What people are failing to understand with this is that this is target people who are foster and don't have a financial supporter.

I see people talk bad and stuff about how this shouldn't be. However those with parents usually have some sort of financial support.

It does suck it is free-free, because it doesn't teach the foster kid important life lessons, but there is more merit to this.

I still think the kid has to pass the accepting test and I think this is the case. If the kid does well, passed the acceptance test they are clear to learn.

Foster kids are not adopted kids, you can adopt but that makes them your kid. Foster kids have sponsor dads and moms.
>'m not sure what you'd capture closer than 8 feet that you would not from farther away

Are you under the impression that long shots show as much as close in shots?
California is the state most likely to be able to fix it, simply get a proposition passed that says:

> No administrator of any education system may be paid more than twice the lowest-paid teacher, no matter how many hours that teacher worked during the school year. A teacher is anyone who is responsible or in charge of children or students. Political salaries are deemed administrative of the educational system that is under the purview of that elected body.
It's possible it's a versioning discrepancy - the language being referred to is here. Your version is "as introduced". During the committee process I believe it is possible for language to be altered before an actual vote without a formal "amendment".

https://twitter.com/JakeLaperruque/status/167888722551627776...
More than 1.2 million people died of Covid in the US. Motorcycle accidents could not have accounted for more than 6,000 of those. We have good estimates of excess deaths (deaths over the expected numbers of heart attacks and other causes), that suggest the 1.2 million is an underestimate.
Type checking allows the compiler to prove certain properties hold for your code, and so this can be used to catch certain classes of bugs. Unit tests don't have that power. But which classes of bugs are caught depends on the type system. Not all type systems are the same. In most statically typed languages, division is not total, and so a function using division can type check, but also crash the program at runtime. In such cases, unit tests can complement types, so you can profit from both. Furthermore, in most languages, the type system is too coarse to prove the sort of correctness that unit tests try to corroborate. If types are a specification, then a sorting function with the type signature `[Int] -> [Int]` doesn't tell us much. There are, in principle, an infinite number of functions that have that type, most of which are not sorting functions. Unit tests can give us some modest, practical confidence of correctness that such a type system cannot. On the other hand, dependent types do permit us to construct return types that guarantee that some ordering relation holds, so it is possible to make the specification more precise in such cases. Such precision may not always be economical or easy to achieve, however. Type inference can assist us in this task, though.

But one of the aspects of types that I find useful is the documentation they provide. In a dynamic language, you often have to guess what the types of functions are by reading the implementation, and not just of the function in question, but the functions composing that function. As a code base grows in size, this can become annoying. With code base size, modularity becomes increasingly important, and modularity benefits greatly from clearly defined and stable interfaces. Also, types can enable something like LSP to make suggestions about what can appear in a given place. With type inference, this can be quite powerful, allowing you to build code in an interactive fashion (proof assistants make use of this behavior).

Unit tests can also provide value as documentation, in the sense that they can function as tested and working examples of, say, how a library could be used.

So, in other words, both types and unit tests have value, and the value they offer will vary depending on the type system and how types are being leveraged in a given situation. There exists an overlap in the practical value provided by types and by unit tests, and where there is overlap, I would say types have the upper hand in principle, if not always in practice.
Elon Musk’s X obsession goes back to PayPal, could lead to WeChat competitor
Some interesting background and thoughts about what comes next.
Can't make texting mistakes if you don't get matches *guy-tapping-head-meme*
At this point, where you are doing KSQL level stuff, isn't it better to just use Kafka, NATS is very appealing for it's simplicity but if I reach a point of re-implementing KSQL or spending 3 hours setting up zookeeper and understanding how to do Kafka distributed for a devops point then Im choosing the latter
Yes, until recently I worked for one of the principals of Sealand. Small world.
Only in a world where an officer can’t get closer than 8 feet from you without a warrant. We don’t live in that world and while I’m not anti-police, American PDs have proven they are both willing and able to game little loopholes like this if they find it to be in their personal interest to do so.
Apology and Update on Recent Accidental Data Exposure
Uh no?

The water at the ground level on the ocean will have the same pressure as the water at ground level in the pipe. The water at 230m down in the pipe will be the same as the water 230m down in the ocean.

Even if the pipe is capped on both ends.
> Working on the buy side, I can tell you that GS is definitely not competent anymore, with all the cost cutting going on.

I last worked there in 2018. So my experience is a bit out-of-date.

> Bloomberg is great if you're big and bring a lot of money to the table.

My experience is from working inside of Bloomberg and trying to get stuff done. I don't know how it looks like from the outside.

Though I can tell you that eg Google was more competent on the inside when I was working there (in 2014 to 2016); but from the outside they are probably not easier to work with than Bloomberg?
This idea is a simplified version of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and RAG has been studied in various research papers, such as the one available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401
That's not how the language works. We have long ago decided that "free", when used in the context of social services, is correct enough to be understood.

Do you think that definition is bad? If so, maybe you'll catch more nibbles by trying to engage in a dialog?
That's how I used CheatEngine back in the day. You would probe the game's memory looking for a value you can control (like health, item count, etc.) then increment/decrement it in game until you reliably found which location in memory was changing. Then you'd save it with a name and enjoy your cheat.
This blog by a former professional options market maker discourages thinking about option selling as a way to generate "income": https://moontower.substack.com/p/why-put-call-parity-is-such... .
Like Thunderbolt SSDs?
Bolt Thrower never gets old.
Never seen the word “inference” used as a verb.
>It does suck it is free-free, because it doesn't teach the foster kid important life lessons, but there is more merit to this.

What about the many countries with free university for everyone? Are those students missing out on important life lessons as well?
DRMed files can be stored on the normal filesystem just fine, if they're DRMed that means they're encrypted at rest and decrypted on the fly.

DRMed content providers might not want to store their files on the normal filesystem because then they might have to answer uncomfortable questions like "why can't I copy this file to X and play it there?" but there's no technical reason they can't do just like every DRMed content provider on normal PC platforms has always done and store encrypted files on the normal filesystem.
Wouldn't have thought of 'ldd', would have gone straight to objdump.
IDK. A bunch of basic development packages like git were missing from my Ubuntu image when I tried last week, and I just gave up because it seemed like a big rabbit hole to go down.

I can see the ARM64 versions on the Ubuntu web package list, so... IDK what was going on?

On Oracle Linux, until I changed some env variables and lines in the makefile, the openblas build would "work," but it was actually silently failing and not using OpenBLAS.
Run by a cousin of Honest Achmed[1] maybe

[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959
Would YouTube need to report [1] (a news report about a police officer accidentally overdosing on fentanyl due to exposure on the job) because it is a fact or circumstance regarding the unlawful distribution of a fentanyl?

How many rap songs and lyrics would need to be reported just because they appear to contain lyrics about potential actual drug use?

Would every "{celebrity_name} dies from drug overdose" news article and discussion on social media need to be reported?

Should USPTO patent US3141823A[1] (a method for synthesising fentanyl) be reported? Perhaps that social media user who linked to this patent is involved in the unlawful manufacture of fentanyl?

Should the National Institutes of Health published article "An Efficient, Optimized Synthesis of Fentanyl and Related Analogs"[3] be reported? Perhaps that social media user who linked to this article is involved in the unlawful manufacture of fentanyl?

Given the proposed bill prevents notification of the preservation request for at least 5 days, is the platform meant to delete the offending content for terms of service violation, or leave the content in place so as to not alert the user(s)? If the platform can't delete the offending content, what happens if the content was uploaded alongside copyright infringing material, pornographic material, or other content that the platform would typically immediately remove?

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd76HxqCPf0

[2] https://patents.google.com/patent/US3141823A/en

[3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169472/
For your point, I would introduce another conceptual level. Perhaps named, 'local', 'social per repo', and 'global'.

Squishing 'local' and 'social per repo' sweeps away on important distinction, IMHO.
Right. The control group is off-planet: some aliens took a tribe of Native Americans a couple centuries ago to another planet far away. Eventually, Captain Kirk will find them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradise_Syndrome
Their noodle necks would only be strong enough to draw blood and maybe slowly tear flesh. They looked to rely on their razor like teeth more than jaw strength. A human could beat them with kick.

Anyone says they have a strong bite doesn't pay attention to other animals with similar jaws. Crocodiles for example can do 3700 PSI but is supported by a rigid neck and doesn't have to deal with the weight to support its jaws. This is also support by a jaw snapping mechanism. You could effectively hold a crocodiles mouth shut with no force at all. This would say the Jarasic Park ones had 1000 PSI, but real life ones 100 PSI and the teeth did all the work. Yeah I think humans have a stronger jaw, further the mouth extends from the jaw the more muscle it needs.

Looked up a caiman bite force it about 400 PSI. There are some that can do more but it makes sense crocodile bite force is how much it can do with its weight. Slightly larger than a chicken Dino isn't going to compete with a caiman.
But the (yocto) documentation could use some work.
I always love getting my tarot cards read.

Do I believe it has special knowledge of the universe? Absolutely not.

Does it get my thinking creatively and critically about the personal story that I have with my self? Yes. And that has some value.
I worked in a capacity with a similar Donor Advised Fund (DAF). Donations are batched and paid out usually each month to make the process more efficient.
MS still hasn't gotten all of their users to transition to outlook.com in order to be rid of hotmail.com, which they bought in 1997.

Do you have the US Government doing it quicker? The only way it ever occurs is if they effectively CNAME .gov to .gov.us to run them both side-by-side.
Mine too. I tried to find a use but I couldn't find a function that I couldn't do better on a laptop or a phone.

Apple is selling millions so it has a function. I just could not find one for me.
I can't tell how much of your sarcasm is based on taking me literally. I'm an atheist. I don't believe in an afterlife, and I'm always blown away when people say that without a "fear of God" or fear of hell, no one would act morally. Whenever someone says that, I'm like, well, I guess you want to kill and torture and rape people and you need this dumb framework to stop you from doing that, so thank goodness for religion. But personally I think we all have ethical responsibilities to other living beings, and especially to our own kind, which spring from appreciating the complexity of the world but can be completely attributed to rational, selfish, deductive reasoning and self-preservation, if you really want to get down to it.

Tl;dr you're arguing the fundamentalist POV that ethics can't exist without a God.
I don't think I've ever encountered an obj c++-related compiler bug in close to a decade of working on a ~200k loc Obj-C++ project, and we do pretty aggressively mix obj-c and c++ things
FWIW there is a really fun "disruptive" desalination option that could work in places like Monterey Bay which is just dropping a really really long pipe down into the ocean that has the desalination membrane at the bottom of it. Top of the pipe is above the surface. Water pressure at depth drives water through the membrane and up the pipe. At the surface you just pump fresh water out of the pipe like an ordinary fresh water well.

Maintenance is basically pulling the pipe up every couple of years and replacing the membrane which will become fouled over time, but generally it would be deep enough that it would not get barnacles and other mollusks on it.
As someone who was homeless in high school (but still graduated thanks to some incredible non-familial adults), it's very easy to think, "fuck it, I'm out, I don't need this extra stress". Doing homework is real fucking hard when you don't have anywhere that's home.
I think that that needs to be what I call “the dog shall not bark up the wrong tree” laws where an organization cannot spend its resources on influencing the laws that manage its conduct. You can argue that it makes sense that these people understand the problem best so they should have some input into the decision-making process. However, I think that the most they should do is present the raw data of their operations sanitized of only the sensitive information that they are required to sanitize by law and no more. Otherwise, they are just government lobbyists lobbying for their advantage.
The way we figured to best approach that is to simply create a set of tools that would allow others to use the core principles and then to see where they take it and adapt as requests come in.

There is a potential legal issue that I have yet to find a good solution to: whether you call them points or stakes doesn't really matter, but what does matter is that they take on some properties of stock and that means that in the eyes of the regulators they may end up being stock. And I haven't found a convincing way to argue myself out of that. This was pointed out to me by a notary public here in NL that otherwise thought that the idea had merit but had serious doubts about whether that part of it would fly, especially if it was employed at scale because essentially you'd be creating a new kind of legal entity out of thin air, a company that behaves in all but one sense like a traditional one but then there are 'shares' and 'points' and somehow the shares then end up calling the shots.

This flies in the face of what the whole thing should stand for and by working hard to say 'stakes' (or points) rather than 'shares' you end up in an undefensible position. I even caught myself once or twice thinking 'shares' rather than 'stakes' so he was making a very good point.

Have you thought about that aspect of it?
This is indeed how I did it before syspatch was available. I ran a more powerful Dell Optiplex tower as my "build box" and built the -stable branch on it, then installed those sets on my low power router boxes.

https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
It appears that areas where ownership are within reach of single income families is shrinking rapidly.
In order for market economies to work (to say nothing of democracies), an educated populace is non-negotiable. The irony is that if you want free markets to work efficiently, you can't leave education to the free market.
> [...] where there is no good way to make the whole bundle atomic.

You could just do all the commit manipulations you need to do, and only update the branches at the very end?

Updating the individual branch 'pointers' ain't atomic, but if there's nothing else going on in the repo at the time, it can't really fail; if you've already created the new commits.
Echoing these sentiments - I find Swift very painful to use.
Isn't it a big problem if readers miss messages if either the topic readers go offline briefly or message throughout exceeds readers?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36840748
Well, before they were machines, they were jobs. We can no more imagine what AI will bring than people from the 1800s could imagine the changes computers woould bring. That is to say: everything changed.
Make me some money with my game. (X and 1 (Prototype))
Well now you’ve jinxed it for sure!
So, uh, what right to be secure in person and property without a warrant approved by a judge?

The US Bill of Rights was so contentious at the time and the supporters so adamant that they ended up being the first 10 amendments to our constitution. The supporters could have very well held out and either forced them to be included in the constitution or left us with the original Articles of Confederation (not the Southern State's one) but compromised. Even if the Bill of Rights were in the constitution, and not amendments, I expect they would be just as disposable.
And for what? So the DEA and CIA can continue to operate with the same privilege as the East India Company?

How does this, or the drug war, serve the average American? I do not for a second believe this provides any benefit to the average American. I do believe it will allow executive agencies privileged access to markets and information of felonious goods, likely to their benefit and not the citizens.
I tried for a pretty light hearted comment and got an angry "read that again" internet rebuttal. Oh well, happy washing.
They are paying no matter what. If you don't educate kids well, you are just paying for it when you retire and get fucked by a weak workforce.
The Nintendo Switch and Sony PS3/PS4/PS5 operating systems are also derived from FreeBSD.
There's plenty of instances of this exact thing captured on YouTube. Police can be seen walking up to people filming and placing themselves in close proximity to block views.
As a way of reducing the costs of higher education in America, I’m wondering how well a “no-thrills” model of a university will be received by students, faculty, employers, and other stakeholders? Today’s universities in America arguably have far more amenities than they did generations ago. My undergraduate institution, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, had in the mid-2000s (and still has) a police department, a large student union building complete with a bowling alley, a career center, many sports and recreation facilities, a health center offering many services, dormitories ranging from classic dorms to relatively fancy shared apartments, and many non-faculty employees offering a wide range of services to their students, from academic counselors to those that watched over the university’s many fraternities and sororities. I’m grateful for these services, and I used many of them. But I wonder how much this costs the university to run, and I also wonder if the addition of such services at universities throughout America, as beneficial as they are, helped contribute to the escalating cost of college?

A good teaching-oriented university needs dedicated faculty, dedicated students, and facilities that help the faculty teach and help the students learn. Some costs are unavoidable, such as hiring good faculty, running a library, maintaining facilities, etc. However, if we eliminate the “frills” and pare a university down to its essentials, will it be affordable? I’m very curious if this is one of the major factors, or are there more significant factors leading to exploding costs?
Don't get used to it. N3E has no SRAM density improvement over N5 and its TSMC's "real" N3 node since N3B (Base) is prohibitively expensive for all but the very richest customers. N3B is such an economic dead end of a node that TSMC doesn't even have an upgrade path to transition N3B designs to N3E.