skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s only a matter of time before someone writes a meta-verilog wrapper for this and the universe implodes.
Oh yes, but one can always have systems in place like location + system tracker.

Upwork has a system where you can track clicks per hour & screenshots every 10 mins along with other details.
I wish religion would dissuade antivaxism. I'm active in a faith and every antivaxer I know is some stripe of Christian. They're a small minority, thank Glob.
The humorous thing is that a lot some people are paying $8/month to then post tweets that most people (everyone?) only see the beginning of.
Yeah I had that with Watchdogs Legion specifically on PS5 even to get to single player. I could bypass it but only by disconnecting from the internet in the system settings which is a pain. I'm surprised too but I guess Sony relies on these big third party publishers to such a degree that they let it slide.
I don’t know, is it really fair to attribute any of these to him? There are thousands of engineers/scientists that did the actual work. Hiring them (especially a competent manager who will manage the operations) is just putting money on the table. With a big enough wallet it’s not particularly hard. Also, spacex had plenty of government funds going to it — wouldn’t those same funds going to NASA resulted in similar results from taxpayer money?

Afaik only paypal had some kind of actual work done by him personally (and frankly, I hate paypal with a burning passion so that’s not necessary a good thing).
The workaround here is to not visit the website in the first place
Eh, living in an area that has far too many astrology-nuts - it's less about flirting and more about forcing their ideology on you.

I'd say less akin to racism, and more akin to religion.
Now do US taxes
> its respective business domain

Or to any number of business domains. See the trademark registration for "Wagatha Christie":

https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00...
>Wasn't that the computer that the first web browser and web server were developed for and on

Tim Berners-Lee invented the WWW, and wrote the first server and browser while working for CERN.
Looks like it's also not possible to register xn--971h.com (I tried both Namecheap and Cloudflare).
> This is for math.

Heh.

The "tabs vs spaces" debate of mathematical typography is whether these symbols should be used at all in printing, or reserved for actual blackboards.
In LaTeX you can have actual boldface letters, so you should write a boldface letter R to represent the real numbers and so on. Using "blackboard bold" in print looks terribly off to some (many?) people.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjoint_union
i collect links to plotter-related projects, code, manuals, et cetera here:

https://github.com/beardicus/awesome-plotters

in case you find this stuff as fun as i do.
one can also try profile guide optimisation and CLANG. GCC an LLVM outperform each other on different code,.
I think I'm going to call the site X/Twitter now. Pronounced: ex-twitter.
(Read: investors chasing the next big thing (after seeing the tech boom) give money to a person smart enough to know that to get the money all he has to do is promise the next big thing from the next tech boom) (and later use the money to hire smart people who sometimes actually do build a big thing)
Jetstream is distributed as an optional part of NATS, so while it exists as a layer on top of NATS Core and provides a different model, describing NATS as entirely stateless is not totally accurate

Though I suspect that Synadia people might do at least one more minor iteration of Jetstream: it still seems a little more complex than it needs to be, unlike Core
Eevdf Scheduler May Be Ready for Landing with Linux 6.6
I think so. Then I'm not right about the punycode encoding of 𝕏.com - it's that it isn't even needed. I've emailed dang about it.
My experience with 𝔽 is “vector space over a field 𝔽”, which is not a concrete object, but I have probably seen F written in a normal italic style more often.
Building a no-JS radial menu with CSS trigonometry
I don't understand the concern for having heavy tension on a wire for a large piece of art. Can't a cross-brace on the back of the frame be used to negate this issue?
Lauded by the usual investor-propaganda machine selling CEOs as gods.
Social media besides FB and Tiktok are largely unprofitable. Twitter was no exception, but it was unique in that it had close to no debt and so could get financing fairly easily. With the acquisition, Musk added $13bn to Twitter's debt, and tanked their revenue by chasing off advertisers. Besides the ads for Starlink and SpaceX, every other advertiser on Twitter looks like a Wish.com-caliber brand.

If they were struggling before, they're circling the drain now.
Well, for years now people have ben talking about a new AI bubble, that might burst at some point.

I've been in this area for a couple decades now and have seen technologies come and go, so I see my AI-related job now as just another generation of tools and making pretty sure that I keep my knowledge still valid in other non-AI related area in the tech space, so that I'm not a data-science/AI-framework-plumbing kind of person.

I keep an interest in standard C++ desktop development, which to me seem a safe harbour even time there is a collapse in some trendy technology.
It's bad form to accuse people of being shills on here, but you do seem rather... well, religious about hydrogen tech at the consumer level, including making some downright-silly arguments. Either you're being paid or you really do see a serious technical injustice in the trend toward BEV adoption.

In the latter case I sympathize; I feel the same about the failure of swappable-battery tech, which would have given us the best of both worlds. Charge at the point of generation or at least at a point of efficient distribution, deploy instantly at the point of use.

And either way, I envy your ability to generate an enormous quantity of posts without getting rate-limited.
The only thing not mentioned are the co-processors that handle a lot of ancillary tasks and thus keep the main CPUs free for more work. For instance, printing a report might require just 1 interrupt per page, the rest being handled by the printing controller. The TN3270 terminals talk to a separate communications controller before being passed to the cpu, and the disks used to be able to return results in a sorted order, not sure what they do now...
normally averse to jokes on this platform, but I love this.
> I've been wanted a way to forbid people to DM me for a long time. Thanks Elon!

Then you should have been happy in like, 2018? when they added that.

You could restrict DMs to people you followed for a long time. The only thing Musk did was add, and then force on for users, "only followers and people who have paid me eight bucks a month can DM you".

"Thanks Elon", indeed.
It’s totally enforceable. It’s a trademark. Who else is doing business with the Unicode doublestruck X?
It persists in many places due to the deeply ingrained belief that, for one reason or another, it would be technically, practically, or economically impossible to migrate functionality off the mainframe. Somehow the people in charge of these systems have managed to convince large enterprises of this for decades. And now we are in a situation where their long held beliefs have become true because nobody is around that understands how or why the software works the way it does. It's a disgrace.
True. It's not until I was writing my blood type on my chest every morning that I memorized it. Every girl with jade jewelry was reminding me of my zodiac sign long before then.
On the other hand, explicitly writing coercions from T to Option<T> gets tiring real fast. I'm sure it should be possible to design a typing+coercion algorithm that automatically coerces `x` into `Some(x)` in 99% of the cases that are actually unambiguous (either due to the type of `x` being known not to be an option or due to parametricity), which would be the best of both worlds.
There is a good deal of tendentious argumentation here, as can be seen in the section on the cockatoos in Sydney which have learnt how to open garbage bins. The author adopts a popular meme in this style of writing, the rhetorical question presented as if the situation presents a problem for current theory:

"Can it really be scientifically justified though to say that a cockatoo has the 'goal' of opening the bin to get at the food inside? Or are we relying on bird consciousness or invoking some kind of weird causality here?"

By posing a question, the author nominally avoids making a blatantly false claim, but the intent is the same. In this case, the correct answer to the question is "yes" - it is not even close to being a problem.

The author then tries to suggest that the conventional explanation is in danger of inverting causality - "The cockatoo striving to eat the food inside the bin (a hypothetical future that hasn’t happened yet) causes it to open the bin in the present" -, as if all this learning was going on before the cockatoos learned that garbage cans often contained food, as if it would have been impossible to have discovered this before learning how to open the cans, and as if the development of foraging behavior is inexplicable under current concepts of evolution.

The author, of course, is well aware that there is no such problem, so, after attempting to raise doubts in the mind of the unprepared reader, he disavows all this, but in a way that tries to suggest that there is another problem: "Of course we can get around this if we appeal to consciousness and say that the bird has a mental model it has constructed around opening the bin. But that would restrict our theory of agency to things that have a brain. It wouldn’t make any sense to say that a plant wants to grow its roots to find water, or that an immune cell wants to chase after a bacterium in order to keep it from infecting the body."

Well, no, Jake, it wouldn't and it doesn't, but so what? The author apparently expects his readers to have already forgotten that this line of argument started with cockatoos' learning from observing one another, something noticeably absent from plants and immune cells.

The whole article is a chain of non-sequiturs constructed in this manner.
X.org seems to have taken some damage just by proximity.
Covid came and went, but cleaner butts stayed
I wonder how the people who work there enjoy being called X-employees.
Notion-like free avatar generator
No ads, just avatars.
>Meanwhile I even understand why some people send her quite a lot of money via crypto to crack a game instead of spending the money directly on the game.
To be fair, those people could be running an internet cafe and want to deploy the illegal copies to 100+ computers.
I think his idea is that Twitter as a pure diffusion platform is dead and/or insufficient, as shown by the competition meta is going to bring in the market with Threads.

His vision is that the west needs/wants a mega app - WeChat like - where you can communicate privately or publicly; interact with people / communities / companies and pay / exchange money. Do not forget that his wealth initially came from changing the way people pay online, he's got a thing for that kind of market.

To create that mega app; you can either start from scratch (hard) or flip an existing product. Ideally such a product would need to have a massive audience (network effect) and at least part of the feature your mega app needs.

Amongst the available platforms; TikTok was too big/expensive and targeted at minors. Meta and all their properties is too expensive. Twitter was the next on this list that was kinda aligned. It was loosing money (so not "too" expensive even if he arguably overpaid it); got a ton of (adult) customers; and communication already provided.

Engineering wise; twitter was known in SV as a place to "vest and rest". So he immediately put a stop to it and made the team leaner. As the saying go: "If you want to go fast; go alone. If you want to go far; go together". It looks like Musk wants to go fast right now. He seems to believe that there is hundreds (if not thousands) of billions of valuation waiting for the first company that would become the western world WeChat.

If he is right; then the 44 billions he paid for Twitter were just a way to kickstart the project; just like he did by turning Tesla from a so-so company to a global leader (depending on the metric you look like). Using his fame definitely would have drawn interest to X.com; but that alone isn't enough. Google itself failed multiple time to launch social networks despite their fame (Google +; Google Wave; ...). But if tomorrow he launches a "Send money to" feature in twitter, he will already have far more user in 24h) than everything he could have hoped for had he done it otherwise. And that might be worth those 44B.

Or he just fails miserably to deliver on the vision; he also had his failures (the boring company being an obvious one).
AskHN: What Are the Early Signs of PMF in a Startup? (Product Market Fit)
That's interesting, do you have any reading material on that?
> For example not everyone has a middle name, but you don't want to go all 5th Normal Form on it.

(actual question) how does 5NF apply here?

I thought that this case could be handled null-free by introducing a separate table

people_middlenames (human_id PK, middlename NOT NULL);

Is it already 5NF? I thought 5NF requires more complex structure of data, like explained in Wikipedia, for example.

Thanks,
It does after large doses of Benadryl.
Another shitcoin designed to separate fools from their money.
>Private remote communication never existed until recent technology made it possible during the last decades.

US Mail, land line telephones. I don't believe either can be intercepted without a warrant.
Data for a million accounts takes up about as much space as maybe a single long YouTube video.

I mean, you can move inactive accounts to a separate table or something if you really want a small performance optimization. Delete them after 20 years. This is a very slow, very long-term problem.
Hey everyone, I’m having a genius business idea. Let’s create ambiguity around everything we do by just calling it all “x”. That way, nobody will know wtf we’re talking about half the time. SpaceX? X.ai? X.com? The shit I took earlier while forming this idea?
People aren't going to suddenly stop calling it Twitter and tweets.

I doubt it will have much impact on marketing. It's most just a domain name and some corporate heading stuff.

The only utility and potential confusion is a single letter domain for linking to tweets until people get used to it. But on sfuff like imessage, SERPs etc it pulls in the <title> tag above the domain so it's not the only signal
You may get more traction with a direct link to your site instead of produchunt.

I still don't understand how it is better than a classical (no-AI) landing page generator. Do you have a video that shows where the AI speed up the process?

The "2 minutes" is imposible to believe. I know it's probably a figure of speech, but one of the expressions I repeat a lot is:

> This is an easy 10 minute fix, so it will be ready in 2 hours. (Because development is never than easy, and there are always surprises, so I never finish the easy 10 minutes fix in 10 minutes.)*
I'm going to shout "You need to treat the root causes" at you next time you are being assaulted, rather than call the police.
"Royalty". Right. Now you have impersonation accounts of everybody under the sun selling you shitcoins and convincing low-information people that they're real because they paid eight bucks.

This is the angry-for-the-weirdest-reasons thing I will read today, and it is 9:10 AM. Coupled with your post elsewhere in the thread that somehow justifies this as paying to be "part of the conversation", and it only computes as "'tis cope".
>You mean the basis for Mac OS X?

I mean the company and OS that failed to leave to Jobs expectations, company pivoted to sell the OS on PCs, failed on that too, and was only spared bunkruptcy because Apple was desperate for an OS and Jobs.

The rest is meaningless retorts in the same vain, when all of the above are failed projects associated with Jobs, just like Musk has his own, which was the point.
We are currently looking for a skilled & passionate Senior Full Stack Developer (m/f/d) to become part of one of our Tech Teams onsite in Hamburg or remote within the EU!

All developers at ABOUT YOU are driven by the love of creating outstanding user experiences across our high-scalable applications. Your work will impact the future of how eCommerce is experienced by millions of customers. As a Full Stack Developer (m/f/d), you will be responsible for contributing to the application architecture and doing intensive, design orientated development on both Frontend and Backend code.

Leap to the next level in your career by building game-changing eCommerce Software and Shop.

What you will do

- Build high traffic web applications with PHP (Symfony or Laravel) and JavaScript / TypeScript (Vue.js, React.js)

- Engage in decisions ranging from UX Design to Backend architecture together with the Tech Lead and explore new technologies

- Build internal & external RESTful API as well as beautiful user interfaces

- Work with agile processes that are adapted to the team’s needs

- Exchange your knowledge with other developers and be part of our ABOUT YOU TECH community

Who you are

- Excellent & MVP-focused coding skills in PHP (Symfony or Laravel) minimum of 4 years

- Practical & recent experience with JS Frameworks like Vue.js or React.js

- Solid background in building complex and beautiful products which are able to handle the requests by millions of users

- Good technical understanding of RESTful API’s

- Passionate about writing well-structured, efficient and maintainable code, actively keeping the quality of the code base in check

- Used to work in an English-speaking environment

YOU ARE THE CORE OF ABOUT YOU.
We take responsibility for creating an inclusive and exceptional environment where all genders, nationalities and ethnicities feel welcomed and accepted exactly as they are. We believe that a diverse workforce essentially contributes to the ABOUT YOU culture. In order to maintain talent and diversity, we emphasize the care for physical health, mental health and overall well-being. Our values and work ethics essentially contribute to our brand mission: empower acceptance and shape an inclusive, fair and circular fashion culture.

We are looking forward to receiving your application – preferably via our online application portal! Thus, we can ensure a faster process and for you it is very easy to upload your application documents.
Even the Flipper Zero Is Getting Its Own App Store
If you don't think you can do that with 300K per year then idk what to tell you, your accounting looks very different from mine
I was apparently running a somwhat older version (thanks to snaps/deb failures). Upgraded and its there!

Thanks a lot for the hint. It looks and feels great.
I could argue that { number that is defined | number that is not defined } is in fact a union type (or, perhaps more correctly, a sum type).
>Where most people want marijuana, it gets legal. Where it doesn't, it's because people at large don't want it. That's it!

Or in a free society, people that want it, get it. People that don't, choose not to get it. Authoritarian is saying "I don't like it, so I will force you not to have it". The right to control one's body is a pretty fundamental freedom. You aren't supposed to be able to vote to take away the freedom of others. In an extreme example, you can't vote to make slavery legal. Laws can be immoral and unethical, and breaking those laws does not automatically make the law breaker unjustified.
Express your creativity with text posts on TikTok
> And yet I don't any great percentage of people from a "rich family" making multi-billion dollar companies.

Because of the rarity of multi-billion dollar companies it makes more sense to flip the question - what are the demographics of those who found those companies?

If the odds of doing something are 1:100 who is going to have better odds at succeeding - the person who gets 1 throw or 10 throws? Neither are guaranteed to succeed, but they both have a chance and one is much more likely than the other. That's what's at play here.
Transparent field level encryption for Django with pgcrypto PostgreSQL extension
The Los Alamos Primer (pdf, 1943)
It's complex. On one hand, some people feel emboldened to reveal their "true side". On the other hand, we realize the guardrails we thought protect society from illogical or immoral behavior... aren't really there.

From that point on we have a choice. Accept increasing chaos and corruption, or build up the missing guardrails we thought were there. However, from what I see, things aren't going strongly in the right direction as I see it, so far...

A civilization is born stoic and dies epicurean.
>He's no Steve Jobs, but sometimes when you don't say something people fill-in context themselves.

Exactly. A significant number of people want to see "Iron Man" in him or that he is playing 5D chess and they will fill the gaps to rationalize that image they have made of him.
My point is that it wouldn't even matter. The historical conditions no longer hold, ie., Would "illegal abortion" be a tyranny for women in 1800? Well, it's going to be very poorly enforced; you may die anyway; etc. It's a fairly marginal infringement of rights.

You're really not much more oppressed if you do/do-not have a right to abortion in 1800. You'll get one anyway, with just the same concequences.

But in today's world with basically risk-free abortions and massive systematic enforcement of the laws, etc., its easy to see that making abortion illegal creates an actual tyranny for women.

It is this which makes the originalist reading of the constitution absurd, immoral, and profoundly anti-originalist.

The issue with originalism is that it outright rejects the plain meaning of the constitution: it is a document which explicitly requires ignoring "what would the government of 1800 have done", indeed, ignoring what any government in history would have done
If you read the history, it sounds like many of his... dysfunctions... go back to the start of his business career, and the latest debacles look a lot like stuff that went down at PayPal/X.com over 20 years ago; where it sounds like he got evicted and Peter Thiel had to clean up the mess.

And in fact this X.com renaming sounds like him dealing with personal baggage and vendettas from back then.

Basically the opposite of the stoic and calculating personality one expects a giant of capitalism to be.

So I actually just wonder if it's more than there was a 10 year period of Musk... getting lucky... by surrounding himself with some competence. That, and the investing world after 2008, with its intensely low interest rates and high tech-sector profits made it easy to "swim naked."

The efforts of a narcissistic showman Dunning-Kruger personality like Musk... are a great place to dump your money as long as you're not the last one holding the bag when shit hits the fan (aka Twitter).
> Problem is with American University itself, its overbloated mandate, abysmal efficiency, and dysfunctional bureacracy that has very little to do with actual education and its outcomes

was it always like this though?

from what i've heard it didn't always used to be like that....
That is why sellers do not always agree to accept stock instead of cash.
I feel like printing this comment and nailing it to the wall, it has greatly helped me understand the hacker community and values in a way that I just couldn't put my finger on before.
Easy to see how this would be more popular than the text feature of Instagram (AKA Threads). Less likely that it will take over Twitter.