skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This is featured the first time you ever bring up the software keyboard and then never again.

In other words, a behavior that something like Driver.js can help you achieve.
By coincidence, a lot of people I know have already been calling them twats.
Folks can still use machines to communicate with others with relative confidence. You can exchange handles irl, use private public key pairs published on your personal site, etc. This runs the problem of invalidation if private keys are leaked, but you can always change it. Web if trust has existed for a long while.

This only addresses chatter with unknown entities. Either you or I or both of us could be humans or machines. But does it matter?
Yet humans have done that since the dawn of time and will continue to do it until the end of humanity.
"Enso: A Streaming Interface for NIC-Application Communication" https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2023/0...

We've been using the same API to communicate with our NICs since 1994. That API severely limits network throughput and latency. By simply changing the API (no new NIC) you can get 6x higher throughput in some apps and 43% lower latency.

Code runs on FPGA NIC only for now: https://github.com/crossroadsfpga/enso

Won USENIX OSDI best paper award and best artifact award.
There is no advantages if you want to splash node relations and get quick and ugly diagram :)).
> For what I can tell, Elon bought Twitter to take it off the stock market, fix it as a private company, creating growth and profitability, and then list it later to make his money back.

A reminder that Elon had to be sued into buying this company.
Sure, "akin" isn't an exact synonym for "equivalent." Feel free to replace "equivalent" with "analogous to" if that bothers you; it doesn't really change my point.
> Google released a plug-in to Internet Explorer called IEFrame

It was called ChromeFrame.

There was also an ActiveX plug-in that allowed hosting XULRunner in IE, which allowed embedding Firefox inside it.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, I'm just saying that's what led to where we are today.
only spent 3 minutes with it (Quiche v1.1 on iOS 17.0 21A5277j) so far, good first impressions.

couple bugs though:
1. "Opening the keyboard automatically when I open a new tab."
This does not work for me, new tab opens and the (empty) address bar is on the very bottom, close keyboard button on the right, but there is no keyboard to close, I still need to click inside the address bar for the keyboard to show up.

Once the keyboard is open, I tap the close keyboard button on the right, click again inside the search field, the keyboard starts opening, but closes right away, leaving again just a search field and a close keyboard button on the very bottom, but no actual keyboard.

As you can see I am running iOS 17 Beta, but I don't experience similar keyboard bugs in any other app, so probably not related to the Beta itself.

2. On another note, when clicking a bookmark and going to the tab switcher right away before the page has loaded, the preview of the tab is totally black and no tab name appears under it either. Not even if I stay on the tab selector page. I actually need to tap it again and then return to the tab selector. This might not be an issue for a single tab, but I just tested opening 5 pages in new in a row, and had no idea which tab is which in the tab selector. If I then tapped one of the tabs that has obviously loaded in the meanwhile, still only the thumbnail preview and name of that one tab was updated on the tab selector, not the other tabs, those were all still black and nameless.

My suggestion is either take over the bookmark name as tab name temporarily, until the actual tab name is loaded and/or auto-refresh the tab selector page with thumbnail preview and tab name every once in a short while (100ms?).
Given that journalists already know they can use a pseudonym… how does this help?
Going through the bibliography of other people's papers and theses, looking for papers that you better cite "for good luck", or because "you gotta cite that one" is a classic PhD student behavior (I've done it) and it's not terribly surprising that something like this can happen. In fact I'd expect it to be much more widespread...
> his daughter with Grimes is literally named "X”

That’s the son - the daughter is “Y”

https://news.yahoo.com/grimes-says-she-changed-her-095553857...
You’re reading more than he wrote. Science is an abstraction, a model of our world that we use to make prediction. It is true that the model is not the world, but it is also true that we have made unquestionable progress in our models and understanding of the reality we inhabit. We just can predict and explain a lot more than we could a century ago.
I have stumbled upon several "open" APIs that had such "security measures" implemented, thus making them rather unusable. It would be a useful advice of what not to do, for anyone building public facing APIs.
https://archive.is/o8aeK
FYI this list isn't exhaustive. And I went to recommend the wikichips link and it's not exhaustive either.

https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/microarchitectures/zen_2#Al...

Both of them are missing the newer 7000-family products with Zen2 like 7520U etc.

https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-5-7520u

https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-3-7320u

https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-athlon-gold-7220u
Israel has a body of Basic Laws, and Barak has declared that body to represent a Constitution.

The Supreme Court is doing a good job determining where a law contradicts a Basic Law, and invalidating that law because of a contradiction. E.g. Surrogacy law was returned to the legislative — not since it was "unreasonable", but because it was unequal. (The legislative fixed the law to include homosexuals, and the law passed.)

The "unreasonableness" clause is not the only tool SC has at their disposal. From now on, they can use the other tools — just not "we find this unreasonable".

> are disingenuous to outright misleading

HN Guidelines: "Assume good faith."
I'll give those another look, thanks!
He already had the money. And plenty of people get lost down this "terminally online" rabbit hole that don't have all the fans and adulation, though I agree that's a component of it. But I think to some extent there are just some personalities that is predisposed to succumb to this, though I think we're all vulnerable to some degree.

That is, I don't think what's going on with him is actually unique at all. All that's unique about it is the level of impact and visibility his deterioration has been able to have because of who he is.
I wasn't actually thinking this though, I was being facetious. Just saying that Elon is running the company so comically poor that you'd have to think he's doing it on purpose. Not saying he -is- doing it on purpose, just that he is actually running the company -that- badly.
Is your ATM card not also a debit card? Mine have always been both.
This is why I stopped buying games from Ubisoft and EA. The kind of shit they pull on their online gaming platforms and the way they treat there employees is a crime against humanity.

Now I stick with independent game companies, they actually want to make the gaming space better.

Steam is pretty good. I really appreciate how much work they put into making games playable on Linux so I don't have to support Microsoft's or Apple's walled garden approach to platforms.
I find it interesting that we can think about [simple and complex] mathematical structures. How did we get the ability to do so and why we can do so?

I distinguish between mathematical structures and "reality". From my perspective, mathematical structures are being used provide succinct description of the perceptible portion of "reality", the Universe as we say. Need all mathematical structures exist?

What can we say about [biological, AI, or even theoretical] systems that can deal with abstract mathematical structures: to be able to construct, modify, specialise or generalise such structures in a extra-computable manner?
The problem is these brands only know about one thing: creating Veblen goods.

So they'd turn Atari into overpriced Atari products that only the 0.1% would buy and it'd ruin the brand even more.
Clearly none of the marketing or branding people stayed on. Or he ignores them.
> That's an oxymoron because stupidity is never cute.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pceDfPLf2hw

Note: This is not an endorsement. It is just a pedantic refutation of your claim.
Julia does have really nice GPU support, being able to directly compile julia code into CUDA, ROCm, Metal or other accelerators. (Being GPU code it's limited to a subset of the main language)
This feels like something that would, at large scale, be unhealthy for science as a whole. While existing papers have already gone through their own quality checks, this enables bad, misleading, or false statements to propagate which can end up being a blow to the credibility of the entire model. Shouldn't there be an ethical duty to due one's due diligence?
In set theory blackboard bold P, Q and C are very often used for arbitrary (forcing) posets
its tiresome that non-technical folk treat musks ideas as novel, but anyone familiar knows that Snapchat, IG, wechat and others are already well along the paths of "everything apps". Sorta interested to see how twitter can compete, being so far behind capability wise.
Oh right, yeah it's basically a form of plagiarism for internet cred instead of a grade in school.
I thought it was pretty clever, we used to tweet about it, now we're just going to x it to another platform.
You should list your email in your HN profile. That way the Internet could check with you to see if you approve whenever someone starts a new personal project.
Sure, everyone wants to be "WeChat for the rest of the world", but even WeChat hasn't really made progress in pulling it off.
What makes you believe we are not more corrupt than they are?

We are just fighting each other over everything, wasting time over billionaires ideas, Musk vs Zuckerberg for the "everything app" for example, China moves forward it seems, they already have it, and is not driven by profit, and the rest of the world seems to want to move along too with them

A lot to hate about China, but they seem to have some great ideas, and are able to enforce them to 1.7b people without a flinch

It also seems like they want to fight corruption [1], and their wish to switch to a digital currency seems to go in that direction

"why expect those who got you in trouble to become the solution?"

[1] - http://brics2022.mfa.gov.cn/eng/hywj/ODMM/202207/P0202207155...
Ok, I live in the US, we don't have one of those. We do have a bunch of companies, insurers and otherwise, that want to assign some sort of risk score to you. Credit card companies will happily part way with transaction data.

*If you're wondering: I have a credit card. I don't really care if some data broker knows that I bought pants or paid my water bill.
Ask HN: What do you use for logging and monitoring a small SaaS project?
> reality is that the elections are pretty free

> but I don't like the insinuation that liberal democracy is the only form of democracy, especially since Israel doesn't have a written constitution.

I feel like these things go hand in hand. An enormous amount of historical precedent suggests concentration of power and illiberalness tends to erode election freedom, even when preceded by free elections.
These can replace damaged boards so I think they serve good function of keeping old cabinets alive.
I don’t remember who stated this but basically there is this thought that Musk was in fact mad about how on Twitter the “common man” could indeed vocally and effectively share their disagreement with his decisions.

It also might have been an impulsive decision to become relevant in “new tech” at the same time (why would he care so much about this, boredom?). Ultimately he probably just wanted to get out of that impulsive deal again though but it was too late.

Lastly he probably also had/has some WeChat ambitions.

We can see how most of these potential goals are now falling apart spectacularly due to extreme unreflected and unchecked ego.

He seems to have succeeded in the first case though, the “moderated”/“mostly sane”(?) free speech “town square” basically destroyed and replaced by an increasingly irrelevant echo chamber for his greater brand.
He want a P2P payment platform, double as a social network, function like a bank, without a bank license.
Walmart Didn’t Kill the Small Town, It Is the Small Town
I hang out on one of the unofficial rust community discords mostly https://discord.gg/rust-lang-community but we talk about all kinds of stuff
> Don't invite that guy to parties, he is not fun

I have been bored to death by flat earthers at parties before. If that’s their takeaway message, then so be it. There are many interesting people to meet everywhere anyway.
https://archive.is/rmz1J
> externally you can describe the change as non-breaking (probably -- performance regressions can be tricky)

Yes, in most programming languages/environments it is always possible to write your application in such a way that any change of a dependency is I’ll break your app. Heck, you could throw an exception if someLib.version != “1.0.2” and then complain that a patch to 1.0.3 is actually a breaking change. Or your app could test that some API method does not exist, then complain when that method gets added later. Or you could complain when performance improvements reveal race conditions in your app (or break your usage of your computer as a space heater).
Do you honestly think DEI is the biggest source of bureaucratic bloat?
A fantastic example of a man / band that is embracing the silliness is Rainbowdragoneyes. He mixes death metal with chiptune and trash pop voice modulators but still produces very intricate and well designed albums, that tell engaging stories, like this one: https://rainbowdragoneyes.bandcamp.com/album/the-secret-mirr...
If its more than 10 yrs old -> It's not a bug its a feature!
I watched the documentary on Netflix the narrow passageway that the bodies were found require climbing up an incline before reaching the chute. Also one of the children had a tool placed in it's hand. The idea that small brains can not be intelligent is wrong, how the brain is connected and shaped determines intelligence to a higher degree. Neanderthals had larger brain masses than modern humans but were less intelligent. And look at Bird brains have more than twice the neurons per unit mass as mammals making parrots/crows have the same number of neurons of as primates despite being much smaller and highly concentrated in the forebrain which is why they are able to make compound tools despite not having hands and more complex communication and social structures.
No it's not. Money is a positive-feedback loop. No intelligence required.
Previously people were banned for tweeting (...sorry x-ing): "men are not women". Twitter is the same anti-free-speech cesspool, just different management.
Maybe this is a good place to ask: Does anybody know a good resource for icons, but bundles as a font (e.g. woff2)?
Always remember: CREAM

Cash rules everything around me
On the contrary, my issues with Dragon are not surrounding its recognition accuracy (though I would kill to be able to hook it up to whisper), but literally everything else.

- Running the accuracy tuning tool more than once actually degrades accuracy

- User profiles will degrade over time, necessitating a export/new profile/import process every few months or else the accuracy becomes unacceptable

- Does not work with electron applications that apparently fucking everything has to be nowadays

- The browser plug-in… Dear God. It outright does not function properly on many top websites (Text input on twitter and twitch come to mind immediately), and it occasionally causes Dragon to slow down to an infuriating degree. Sometimes it actually causes certain sites to break!

- Unstable. Crashes to desktop a couple of times per week, and leaves some appendage running in such a way that it can't be directly restarted. I had to write a PowerShell script (https://gist.github.com/Karunamon/f2b684d083fc341ee79aab1fb2...) and put it on my start menu to deal with this.
Elon Musk said he wants Twitter to become the WeChat of the western world
Attributed to economist Gordon Tullock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Tullock#Tullock's_spike
> And yet I am still tempted to add this 204 service, but maybe then I also don't have internet on my phone anymore because it keeps believing it's behind a captive portal when the service is offline

Try it. Normally Android will say "This connection doesn't give you internet, connect anyway?" then you press yes, and everything works. (Except if you're on a captive portal, in which case you'll need to type example.com in your browser to access the captive portal).
How to speak (MIT OpenCourseWare) [video]
Thats actually a really cool idea. The big PR agencies who rep for actors, authors, musicians etc, could run an instance and that's where the person's identity would be.
> He's clearly not motivated by appearing intelligent

Musk has spent and continues to spend an inordinate amount of effort cultivating a particular image/brand of himself, one which has gained him a large following.
That sounds like admitting there is no secret sauce?

The superpower has been the ability to synthesize output from very disparate training sources, and any answer for "I don't know" would come from needing to synthesize disparate training sources.
Twitter wasn't ever close to making money - its IP wasn't even that valuable - hence the several clones that have popped up since Musk's purchase.

This is a straw man - like many other of the comments here. Full of emotion, but vapid in real substance.
The blue bird will live on in favicon (until they notice) and in many websites that has link to twitter, but won't be updated anymore.
He said that there's no proof the mine ever existed. He also said that his parents' wealth didn't help him that much. Which is why he also never bothered much about the mine.

I'm going on memory here, from what I read/heard online. I think people just want to write him off, tbh.
My new computer takes a while to POST (z690 with ddr5 smh) so it’s basically been continuously either on or in sleep since I built it 18 months ago and I’ve had an unexpected shutdown due to power loss once in that time according to the Event log. I think the risk of losing power while flashing the bios is very small in real life unless you are stuck in a place with third world electricity infrastructure.
I'm confused. There was a surprise that LGPL was not seen as equiv as MIT/BSD/Apache by orgs, so I clarified with the typical example of why organizations may have default-deny rules for LGPL libraries bc the static linking restrictions, and that those default-deny rules would require devs in these orgs to get an exception. You made me curious, and this thread was enlightening to me: https://www.quora.com/Can-I-use-LGPL-in-commercial-software . Note the political & bureaucratic work that'd be involved to get a licensing exception, and then the extra SW infra work to do the above.

Again, I try to keep our team technical & neutral about graph DB/lib/etc providers. We get used with a variety of tools, and I personally end up seeing areas where each invests more than others + try to keep discussions to the resulting kind of objective distinction. So I'm genuinely curious what's wrong in my summary, both wrt legal theory and what organizations do in practice. I get frustrated when projects we get pulled into (digital crime, outages, genomics, ...) get hamstrung by something like OSS licensing.
> They provide no actual measurement of applicants, Myers-Briggs is especially easy to cheat.

Myers briggs aside, I take issue with this specific argument in any context, just because a dishonest party can cheat a test, doesn't mean the test itself is worthless. I can do a math test with a calculator without knowing how to even do math, (oh, put this symbol next to that symbol and hit the = key?) doesn't mean the test is worthless.
Israel has Basic Laws in lieu of Constitution, and Barak has declared the body of Basic Laws to be a Constitution.

UK, notably, also has no constitution — it however wouldn't be reasonable to argue that "the only democracy keeper [in the UK] is the supreme court".
The Flipper Zero has an app store now
Fiat Currencies MarketCap Ranking
Come on, we are relying on 17/18/19 year olds to do a proper financial risk analysis on _debt that can never be bankrupted_? Adults have created this mess, don't put the blame on students 'doing what they've been told' e.g. go to college (more prestigious the better, too)
Population density makes a huge difference. The more people live in a city, the more funds the government has to invest to get a better transportation system.

In general, population density in East Asia is far higher than in the US.
A use-after-free in AMD Zen2 Processors
No, only the ability to execute arbitrary code in an unprivileged context. Would probably have to be arbitrary x86_64 instructions - Javascript wouldn't cut it for this one.
everyone sees the twitter blood in the water
It’s a Unicode symbol that can’t be copyrighted that was suggested in a comment reply and the CEO had to spin the rebrand after Musk tweeted for 12 hours through the night with no sleep.

He has no plan. How is that not painfully obvious at this point
> You substituted the executive with the legislative which is telling, whether you did so in good faith or not. The reality is that Israeli parliament is weak and nearly wholly controlled by the government

Isn't that totally ordinary for parliamentary democracies? Don't they literally work by having the leader parliament wear the executive hat in addition to his legislative one?

The hard distinction between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches is (mostly) an Americanism.

> Harari's point is that there is no force to counterbalance the executive other than the courts. If there was the court could possibly be weakened with democracy remaining somewhat intact. But of course the goal is not to restore checks and balances but unlimited executive power.

It's kind of interesting to see how the liberal zeitgeist's view of "checks and balances" shifts radically based on the context. In the US, a lot of liberals have been fantasizing furiously for the past several years over parliamentary systems that lack them, because in the US the "checks" have recently been thwarting the liberal political agenda.

Honestly, I think a lot of liberals would actually prefer a "democracy" closer to Iran's system; where there are "elections," but ultimate power rests with a liberal "Guardian Council," so the outcome is liberal regardless of the election results.
No, a breaking change is if the interface contract changes in a non-backward compatible way. If the interface contract never promised you to get “banana”, and you still relied on that behavior, then yes your client code may break, but that’s on your side of the program, and your fault for relying on unwarranted assumptions, and not a breaking change in the library you called.

The purpose of interface contracts is exactly to precisely specify what can change and what can’t change without breaking clients, and conversely which assumptions clients can or can’t make. This is a precise give and take. The clients are expected to play by those rules just like the implementations of the interface are expected to maintain their promises — nothing more, nothing less.
Worst part is when you start questioning, how LLM came up with an answer, and it just adds your suggestion to its answer.
https://archive.is/ZveGn
I was able to reproduce the vulnerability using javascript on a webpage. Therefore, no.
To me that just sounds like an example of the reason to avoid tight coupling.

If something breaks beacause it cares that I use git and only git, then it's that something that is broken and to be avoided, not the git alternative.