skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This! Although I think the most likely failure considering the amount of money spent on the plant is that they probably dove head-first into automation and hit the integration challenges this can have.

(Perhaps a business case of “on-shoring makes sense if everything is automated!” that failed to account for the challenges of opening a fully-automated facility)
There's an even bigger issue that noone seems to get apart from Tesla: Is there actually a market for such a battery? Today's EVs can already be used for normal daily commutes without even thinking at all about range anxiety. That covers 95% of all drives for normal people. And the remaining 5% can be covered with some slightly more sophisticated route-planning. Tesla has already come out and said they could make cars that drive twice as far, but there is no real market for that. And since battery resources are a limiting factor that pretty much grow linearly with range, they rather make twice as many cars.
Ahah thanks, yeah if you don’t need 400 cores, why have them? I mean, sometimes you need power but if you don’t need it, is better to have a slightly older hardware, but more reliable and, above all, with less consumptions/environment-bills impact.

In example: I’m using at home a RaspberryPI 4B as a Pi-Hole that is a totally waste of power, I’ve installed the same sistem in some companies with 70/80 DNS clients and all is running more than fine …but on a Raspberry PI 3B!
Everything is relative. We have seen thousands of other planets (And millions of other stellar objects) and this planet is a hell of a heaven compared to every single one of them. According to our observations so far anyway (to the chagrin of ufo lovers).
For more than half a century they unsuccessfully try to unify Standard Model with gravity ... doesn't it mean that at least one of them is inaccurate?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity#Nonrenormaliza...
Like AI Dungeon?
Unfortunately it does not at the moment, I was working on that feature before jumping onto a new project and I was not able to deliver it in time. It’s probably going to come in the future though
Yea I'm pretty sure the people in Palestine OH felt it trickling down for sure. Just hope they didn't drink the water.
"The Glass Age"[0](multipart) by Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12OSBJwogFc
The first two reasons are enough to disqualify it
Try reading about a subject. Then learn from someone who has worked with the subject for 10-20 years. Experience matters a lot for deep knowledge. That's an important kind of knowledge.
Not only it's useful, it's as easy to do in git as typing `git rebase -r`. Recently it even gained support for rewriting branch pointers in the process.
It would suck a lot. GPT lacks coherence in lots of fronts.
A game made with Inform6 (OOP) or Inform 7 (natural language), even done by an amateur it's much better on consistency and playability.
Liquid cooled charging cables is pretty standard for high speed DC fast chargers already. When that cooling is broken at an Electrify America charger, for example, charging is limited to something around 50kW.
Mitoq failed as a therapeutic option for primary mitochondrial disease. Now, it is sold OTC. As a patient with primary’s mitochondrial disease I have tried mitoq several times. Other than placebo effect, it did not work for me
I installed some apps like this (not Home Depot specifically) because they bribed me to do it. The first item you buy via the app is often a bit cheaper than the price you get on the website.

It's a great way to find out how much you value your own time. Apparently, my time is worth significantly less than what I charge my clients :)
Exactly my point, thanks,
How many people are regularly driving more than 300 miles without stopping for 30-45 minutes anyway? I guess this does step around the need for more charging infrastructure, but it seems like most range anxiety is pretty misinformed at this point.
I think that studying never gives deep knowledge if it doesn't involve actually doing it, i.e practice. I think that can get us closer to where the gap is here: just reading something is not enough to have all the knowledge?
Read this in paperback when it came out. Highly entertaining and highly recommended!
So the Model Y is beginning to outsell the Corolla but Toyota is just going to wait until 2027 to launch this for reasons? Because they are so awesome they don't mind other companies eating their lunch? That isn't believable.
> As you mentioned it goes against the Unix philosophy of do one thing and do it well. To me it's obviously cleaner to divide a system into components that can later be swapped or modified independently.

Anecdote: when i first met Richard in 2011, after having contributed to Fossil since 2008, i asked him why he chose to implement fossil as a monolithic app instead of as a library. His answer was, "because I wanted it working next week instead of next month." It was a matter of expedience and rewriting it now would be a major undertaking for little benefit.

Reimplementing fossil as a library is a years-long undertaking (literally) and is not something we're interested in doing directly within the Fossil project, but is something i maintain as a semi-third-party effort, along with a handful of other Fossil contributors, over at <https://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/r/libfossil>.
You could use some kind of buffer; another battery. There are already a few companies out there working on MW+ chargers. Mostly they are aimed at trucks and buses. But the technology is there.

The peak load is clearly not coming from the grid. One issue would be that that power is relatively expensive. Using that kind of is a last resort. Instead you'd want a lot of on site battery that can provide lots of power quickly and can soak up power from nearby solar panels, or cheap night time grid power. Easy to say because that is already how a lot of fast chargers work. If you operate these commercially, ensuring access to cheap power is key.

Also, just because people buy bigger batteries doesn't mean they actually drive more or use more kwh. It just means they can spread out their charging a bit more. Which means fast chargers would be something they would need to use less.

With a battery that large, you'd almost never run out as driving that kind of distance on a single day would be very rare for most people. And honestly the few times you actually do that, take some breaks.

This charging pattern is of course already the case for EVs with far smaller batteries. Most EV owners rely more on overnight slow charging than fast charging. With a battery that big you might get away with never having to use a fast charger at all.
Ever see that meme about newcomers to ML make a giant leap to bert/chatgpt? Id wager 100 bucks you're right. Also bet a lot of dudes nephews made a lot of money while being unqualified for their positions.
It's very much a "glass half full" perspective, which gets tiresome from somebody like Bjarne who is very resistant to the idea that he's made mistakes. It excuses lots of bad mistakes because hey, if people really felt that way they wouldn't use C++ right? But of course increasingly they aren't using C++ because it sucks, which is why they were complaining.

Unlike C++, Git has put considerable work into responding to complaints, understanding that while yes, they wouldn't complain if they didn't use it, they also wouldn't complain if there weren't so many things to complain about. Lots of things we use every day don't get many complaints because there's nothing much wrong with them. Even the brutal Git command line is less hostile today than it was originally.
> (I may want to use a changeset that is still developing in more than one branch without maintaining copies of it)

Not sure if you realize, but a commit is a state of all files in the repository, not a patch. Patches are calculated for you at display time (and can be calculated against any other commit, not just a parent). Sounds like you may be confused because of trying to apply a wrong mental model of how the repository represents things.

I'd say that git actually supports stacked workflows quite well. It's GitHub's PR model that makes it hard.
I'm one of those people. It depends on the use case. VSCode has a plugin to use a Neovim instance behind the scenes, complete with supporting (some) plugins and configurations. At work I exclusively use this, since it has debugging support and is more in line with my coworkers are using. At home, where I'm writing in a wider array of languages and often haven't bothered setting up a debugging environment for many projects, I use mainly Neovim.
Then it seems like a pretty terrible idea to just assume they increase the likelihood of social ideation more than they prevent, no?
You're not supposed to type your password!
I'm pretty sure reading about the inspiration for the WASTE name was my gateway to Pynchon.

For which I'm ever grateful.
That's a very good question. I'm not experienced with law, but found an article, and they say that the in case of defamation, it's the publisher that's liable. https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/republishing-someone-else-...
Why? At the end of the day if they can produce a good car at a good price by the time EV hit mass adoption / ICEs get banned, they will be fine.

I don’t understand why people think just because you are late to market means you can’t get market share - or even dominate. Cars aren’t operating systems or social media platforms, there is no network effect.

Heck, Toyota entered the US car market when US manufacturers like GM and Ford were long established.
Pretty reasonable indeed, and during the pandemic there was a free temporary license.
Chilling effects of the "nothing to hide" era. People were being allowed to be sued based on IP, so a lot of people just stopped using the net for normal human things.

The revelations of domestic spying made it obvious how much collusion and voluntary cooperation was going on between the military, federal and local governments, law enforcement, and corporations, and how much people feared the state of unequal information dominance.

Remember, sharing mp3s helps the terrorists win.
Scientists develop self-healing solar panels which reverse radiation damage
If you live in an apartment and often work from home, you probably don't drive hundred miles every day, and as such don't need to charge the car very often.

I did the math for myself, and with how far and how often I go places, I would need to charge a 400 km range Hyundai Kona about once every two to three weeks.

I do have pretty favorable conditions, though (and mostly continue to use the bus).
You don't know, you just generate it
Thanks, it's what I wanted to achieve, so I'm glad I've reached it! By the way the blog is powered by Jekyll and theme is 'Jekyll Yat Theme' (https://github.com/jeffreytse/jekyll-theme-yat/) slightly customized.
Thank you for the correction. I still maintain the license is obnoxious, but clearly I was wrong about the models themselves.
Tesla also released the Model Y 4 years ago and now it may outsell the Corolla this year. What do the waitlist and sales for the RAV4 or Prius Primes look like?
And on the flip side "We don't need those dirty manufacturing jobs, we will have a service industry" , "You didn't build that" and "Never coming back".

Throw in a dash of "Learn to code" too.

Maybe one day we can sit down and talk about how shitty it is but not until we stop playing Team Red vs Team Blue
This isn't security through obscurity at all, the links contain a random secret and aren't public. You might as well say a password is security through obscurity because it can be guessed...
Helplessness is one big factor. Why worry about something you can't change? Climate change needed massive actions that even determined individuals can't enforce. Yet, many governments and corporations (especially the energy sector) are behaving like everything is fine. Climate change can't be controlled (much less reversed) without all of these big players falling in line. Yet, some still invest in climate misinformation despite the overwhelming number of red signals in nature. Even when citizens protest, we see them suppressed with money power. At this point, many have accepted that they are inevitable victims of insurmountable human greed.
>This isn't just about China, the Shenzen example was exaggerated. What I meant was: Where I live I'm there's an insane dissonance where companies are on the one hand trying to only hire academics for jobs that they think require an academic skill, yet happily pay Hays/Accenture/$TEMP_AGENCY to procure workers for them when those academics can't be found or don't perform. They're not willing to give me a permanent job with competitive pay because of my lack of degree, but are happy to pay Hays 70-100€/h so they get me as a temp.. doing the exact same shit, pretty much in perpetuance.

Yeah, of course.

"A sound banker, alas, is not one who foresees danger and avoids it, but one who, when he is ruined, is ruined in a conventional and orthodox way along with his fellows, so that no one can really blame him."

-- Keynes might as well have been talking about IT procurement managers.

Just like nobody got fired for hiring IBM, nobody got fired for hiring Accenture, even though they absolutely should because they're probably the worst consultancy on planet earth.

Degrees also provide a degree of arse covering for hiring managers.
Because no one is driving a universal content aware diff, as far as I can tell.

If you just want images then gitlab does a good enough job.

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/-/commit/2f63565e7...

How would we represent video diffs? I don't deal with video so I'm not an expert, but there appears to be people complaining without suggesting solutions.
Ask HN: What forum software do you recommend?
Asking here not just for tech expertise, but because HN itself is not far from what I like. Basically, I want to make a community for writers, as in an actual community and not a gathering of strangers.

Reddit: Dying, not owned, but more importantly, it's bad at community.

Discord: Decent for community but seems to scale extremely badly with more content. For example, you can't give users their own space. Forums and threads become a mess.

Discourse: I can't put my finger on it. It works for support but I haven't seen it do well for community. The system with badges, Regulars, Leaders, etc seems to basically be designed to automod strangers to have power over one another.

SMF/phpbb/vbulletin: Cozy, but feels dated, especially without mobile support.

Invision Community: Actually seems good but also bloody expensive with the lowest amount set at $58/month?

Any other suggestions? Anything that I'm misreading here?
Ask HN: Can we start tech again?
Mainly referring to increasing walled gardens, advertising, authoritarianism, and complexity of the web stack. Can we start from scratch? Simpler devices, open standards - a device and web environment that can't be bent to government and advertisers?

Is there any merit/benefit to starting again? Is it possible to expect less from our devices and technology, and revert to a more low-tech, open ecosystem.

The idea is half-baked for sure. I just see a lot of negative sentiment here on HN about the trajectory of the internet and technology in general. And yet it is the one community ripe to solve it.

Not looking for anything concrete. Just general thoughts.
"hence as much power" => "hence as much average power"
Why not? The audience is people who are deploying JS apps. Such people likely have access to the internet and are able to google "smol" if they want to know what it means. I'm not a first language speaker of English either, the system language on my phone is not English, if I google "smol" it immediately give me the translation into my system language. It takes no time at all.
This thread is super interesting:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31306337
I don't, I think that line length limits are typically not a good idea and thus I don't like hard limiting them. Now obviously arbitrarily long lines are no good, I'm not advocating for people to write 300+ char lines. I'm just saying that sometimes there's good reasons to (slightly!) go over the "limit", for example shortening the variable name "users" to "usrs" to make a n+1 line fit into the n char limit would be a terrible idea. And also when this topic comes up then typically people implicitly think about the 80 char limit, which is just way too restrictive and has no reason to exist anymore, it's not 1980.

The limit on what constitutes a reasonable line length is a bit subjective but I'd say that well written code rarely goes above ~120 or so. Depends a bit on the language, some just have more boilerplate than others. But instead of making that a hard limit I'd warn above that number so actual people can decide if it makes sense there or if a rewrite is in order. Auto-formatting is great and all, but ultimately a human should have the last decision.

Though if you force me to pick a value, then it's 4 because that's the sanest choice for like 95-99.9% of all people.
The problem with these positions is that they are all diversity hires themselves, and create animosity between employers and employees.
Rapid chargers are primarily a psychological safety net. Prospective EV owners really worry about them, but EV owners rarely use them. You might take a road trip once a year, but the average driver covers less than 40 miles per day. The normal overnight charging that represents the vast majority of EV power consumption is actively beneficial to the grid by providing demand smoothing; the marginal cost of a kWh falls if someone is willing to buy super-off-peak power at 2am.
Llama2's license agreement explicitly forbids training novel models based on Llama2's output.

> v. You will not use the Llama Materials or any output or results of the Llama Materials to improve any other large language model (excluding Llama 2 or derivative works thereof).

https://ai.meta.com/resources/models-and-libraries/llama-dow...
In my practical experience the set of things that can go wrong if you link apps dynamically is much larger than the problems that arise when they are statically linked.

For one, it is more complicate to keep track of which of the many shared libraries on a typical system are used by which application. It is common that the same library occurs multiple times in different versions, built by different people/organizations and residing in different directories.

Quick, without looking: which TLS library do your network exposed subsystems use, which directories are they in and where did you install them from. When you do go to look: did you find what you expected?

Have a look at all the other shared libraries on your system. Do you know which binaries use them? Do you know which versions of which libraries work with which binaries? Do you trust the information your package manager has about version requirements? Does it even have that information?

Then there's the problem of what happens when you upgrade. The servers you run might have a rigorous battery of tests. But now you are running them with libraries they were not tested against. Sure, most of the time it'll work. But you don't know that. And you have no way of knowing that without downloading, building and running the tests. Or have someone else do that.

I've been in the situation where someone inadvertently updated a library in production and everything came crashing down. Not only did it take down the site, but it took a while to figure out what happened. Both because the person who did it wasn't aware of what they'd done. And the problem didn't manifest itself in a way that made the root cause obvious.

The clearest risk with statically linked binaries is if they are not updated when there is, for instance a security problem. But in practice I find that easier to deal with since I know what I'm running, and for anything important, I'm usually aware of what version it is or when I last checked for updates/problems.
> ejmr made a system that includes hashes that could trivially be linked to ip addresses

"trivially be linked" = searching 3 quadrillion possibilities?

Suppose that in the near future that a quantum computer enables the "trivial" piercing of current anonymity assumptions, should those individuals also be fair game for doxxing: "they were never anonymous"?

Your casual appropriation of "triviality" to dismiss moral concerns over this paper and the authors' possible motives rings hollow in me.
> Tesla's "V4" charger uses liquid cooled (!) conductors to supply 1KA at 1KV; 1MW

Does it? Can you show me a public Tesla charger that delivers 1 megawatt?
I actually studied photography (technically contemporary art, but photography was my main medium) but chose to not pursue a career in it. You are correct, bit depth matters. It is unlikely 32 bits will ever be needed for RAW files though.

Specifically, it matters for source files and intermediate files.

With RAW files from the camera, the higher the bit depth of the analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) step, the less posterization this introduces on the signal. Theoretically at least, you're still limited by the sensor's dynamic range, and there are other subtleties involved, like light perception being logarithmic instead of linear, but RAW encodings being linear[0][1]. But in simple terms: paired with a sensor with high dynamic range and good ADC, a higher bit depth results in less noise and higher dynamic range. Which allows one to recover more fine detail from shadows and highlights. Which makes the camera more forgiving in normally difficult lighting scenes (low light and/or high contrast). So a higher bit depth can aid in giving photographers creative freedom when shooting, and more flexibility in editing their photos without loss of fidelity.

So yes, it is an important cog in the machine that is the whole processing pipeline.

Having said that, as I mentioned our eyes perceive light logarithmically. The dynamic range of the human eye is... complicated to determine, because it adjusts so quickly. At night it may go up to 20 stops, during the day 14 stops is likely to be the typical range[2]. So it's probably not a coincidence that digital cameras have "stalled" at using 14 bits for their RAW files, typically: the photographer likely wouldn't be able to see more contrast in the lights and shadows before taking a photo anyway!

[0] https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4653441881/bit-depth-is-ab...

[1] No I don't understand why floating point ADCs aren't used either, seems like it would be a more sensible approach to me and they do exist: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/776106

[2] https://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html
L8w8jwt – a minimal, OpenSSL-less and lightweight JWT library written in C