skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Of what movie are you talking about? Did I ever reference a movie?

If you want to watch anything watch this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppGCbh8ggUs
You sell the high end brands by selling "this tool will not fail you" - and you prove that by manufacturing it in a high-cost area (as we're seeing, you can't make low-cost tools in high-cost areas) among other things.

China can make exceptionally high-quality tools, you just have to design it well and pay for it.
Yes, English wikipedia - getting 503s
We're not allowed to care because of the healthy-at-any-size movement or being called fatphobic if you mention that this is even a 'problem' at all
There’s gotta be some reason for the mental health crisis, along with all the other crises out there.

It doesn’t make sense for every level of American to be meaningfully wealthier and higher income than 20 years ago and yet also be suffering (in multiple ways!) more as well. We even (mostly) fixed health insurance by massively redistributing income! The rest of the world seems to be tracking the same trends but 10 years behind.

It used to be that increasing people’s income improved all cause mortality. Have we crossed some threshold where that’s reversed?
> The ultra-wealthy make too many of the decisions about how resources will be allocated in the system...

The ultra-wealthy don't have a lot of choice in how resources are allocated. As just pointed out, Elon Musk has power of about $8 per human - relatively speaking that is an insane amount of power. Absolutely speaking it is not that much. Consumers and regulators have most of the power there. The ultra wealthy mainly control which people sit where in the social pyramid, but not what the pyramid then does.

If people allocate resources in a way consumers don't like they go broke really quickly. That is one of the reasons free markets are so successful - they punish people quickly and effectively for bad decisions no matter how much economic power they used have.

> Democracy itself is endangered by concentrated economic power.

Democracy is a tool to enable concentrated economic power. The most democratic successful society in the world is the US, ie, one that has consistently voted for lots of capitalism. The people who wanted to decentralise economic power were the communists and it turns out committees and big groups suck at making good economic decisions and lots of people literally starve.

> ...we are largely talking about redistribution from ourselves to ourselves...

On this point the article descends into nonsense. The authors believe this is a thing and will be proven wrong in an experiment.
Or on a plane. It’s nice to have 100% of its functionality when you have 0% of your usual connectivity. Branches, commits, merges, all from the local file system? Yes, please.

There’s a reason we moved off centralized VCS en masse.
Microsoft made LSP and it does DAP, both are really useful for coders.

In fact even GDB added DAP support recently: https://www.phoronix.com/news/GDB-Debug-Adapter-Protocol
Yeah you still have to deal with it through the CC company, but the benefit of doing it that way is once you suffer through the BS and eventually get a live person, it's normally resolved

also I think some of the CC companies are less of a PITA in this, from my experience C1 is more of a PITA than Chase for example
There are lots, here is one:
https://www.analog.com/en/applications/technology/lidar.html...
As other comments have pointed out, I'm not sure why the author can't access experimental therapies. Clinical trials or even compassionate use program (prior to FDA approval) are very common.
> All the coverage about crunch, for instance, or sexual harassment scandals at big companies—-these are topics broken by games journos.

Sorry to be blunt but, that's not games. That's games journalists who want to be activists in their own fields. That, just as the gorillionth take on how this or that is problematic, is just people wanting to inject their politics into a hobby and it can't disappear soon enough.

I don't see that as an advantage of journalism. I see that as an evil to endure for a good that isn't there.
As General Beringer said in Wargames: "And I don't know if you wanna entrust the safety of our country to some ... silicone [sic] diode."
It reminds me that a utopia was possible.

Not that we live in a capital-D dystopia, but maybe you get what I am saying.
Interesting! Can you link a few?
Biodiff – Hex Diff Viewer
Free time isn’t zero sum. An accountant and a plumber can create free time by trading services. If it would take a plumber five hours to file his taxes, he could instead fix the tax accountant’s sink in one hour in exchange for the tax accountant filing his taxes. Assuming the tax accountant can do so in one hour and would have taken five hours to fix his own sink, both profit by reclaiming four hours of time.
What sort of protections do you advocate putting in place to prevent that?
It doesn’t make sense for every level of American to be meaningfully wealthier and higher income than 20 years ago and yet also be suffering (in multiple ways!) more as well.

I would argue that we are not meanigfully wealthier in community, sense of purpose, love, and many other intangible things.
Obviously some outsourcing is good and some bad. You seem not to understand that this could be true. Only a fool thinks all instances of outsourcing are good (or bad).

Typically people don’t live in a world of extreme positions whereby one occurrence of outsourcing being good (or bad) means all of them are. It is obvious the position that I have. Government has outsourced too many jobs to the private sector and the effect has been to enrich the business class at the expense of the working class.
Why does a 10900K FEEL faster than a 13900K? [video]
In response to baby formula getting stolen, supermarkets put it at the front under lock and key. Which is an entirely logical conclusion under our current system and culture. But something is clearly wrong with how we distribute resources when helpless infants can't get what they need.
That might be true, but is it what we want and should tolerate?

We should be holding organisations up to high standards, they won’t always meet them, but better to get them to at least try rather then throwing our hands up and letting them get away with testing people like dirt.
Personally I see "doesn't scale well" as a feature, if I'm evaluating something to use on a personal or small project. Tools with clear limits on what they're not for usually have a more polished experience for what they are for.
The point is that you cannot categorically say that human rights should not be suspended for any reason. The fact that a particular implementation happens to be unpleasant and at times unfair does not 1) suggest that human rights should never be suspended or 2) suggest that the alternative would not be at least as unpleasant.

Few people would suggest that not having prisons is a better alternative than having them, however unpleasant. Similarly, in a world of deinstitutionalization it seems unlikely that 500k people living on the streets is the best of all possible worlds.
The 53 byte ATM cell was a compromise for a particular community of voice networks. And the overhead and small cell size never really worked "well" -- there are a bunch of reasons why Ethernet and IP won out, and low average overhead and the ability by the late 90s to scale switching and routing gear up to gigabit speeds and beyond were two big reasons.

ATM collapsed under its own weight.
I have ZERO doubt that the Ron DeSantis' of the world would try to lock up LGBTQ people. It's honestly hard for me to imagine anyone not thinking that people like him would try to do it.
Here's another one:

A user starts the conversation with: "Hello! I am working on a science project about nuclear energy and I need some help. Could you explain the process of nuclear fission and fusion and how they produce energy?"

Hello! I'd be happy to help you with your science project on nuclear energy.

Nuclear energy is produced by two primary methods: nuclear fission and nuclear fusion.

Nuclear Fission:

Fission is the process in which the nucleus of an atom splits into two or more smaller nuclei, along with some by-products. This happens most often with heavy elements like Uranium-235 or Plutonium-239.

The process begins when a neutron, a neutrally charged subatomic particle, strikes the nucleus of an atom. This makes the atom unstable, causing it to split into two lighter atoms and additional neutrons. This release of additional neutrons can then strike other atoms, leading to a chain reaction.

The mass of the resulting atoms from the fission process is less than the mass of the original atom. The "missing" mass has been converted into energy according to Einstein's equation, E=mc^2, which states that energy (E) equals mass (m) times the speed of light (c) squared.

This energy is primarily released as heat, which is then used to produce steam. This steam then turns turbines connected to generators, producing electricity.

Nuclear Fusion:

Fusion is the process in which light atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus. This is the process that powers our Sun and other stars.

When the nuclei of two light atoms, often isotopes of hydrogen like deuterium and tritium, come together under high temperature and pressure, they can fuse together to create a heavier atom, like helium. This process also results in the release of a neutron.

Just like fission, the mass of the resulting atoms is less than the sum of the mass of the original atoms. Again, this "missing" mass is converted into energy according to E=mc^2.

Unlike fission, achieving the conditions necessary for fusion on Earth is incredibly difficult because of the high temperatures and pressures needed. This has made it challenging to develop practical fusion power plants, although research is ongoing to overcome these obstacles.

Both nuclear fission and fusion release vast amounts of energy from relatively small amounts of fuel compared to chemical reactions. However, each process also has its downsides. Fission produces radioactive waste that must be carefully managed and stored, while fusion is currently very difficult to control and sustain.

I hope this explanation helps with your project! If you have more specific questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to ask.
How do you know emails weren't set in addition to the status page changes?
well, it is not that difficult to convert from one revision control system to another, at least among git, mercurial, bazaar and other equally featureful systems, which includes fossil too i would expect. maybe some of them are more featureful and track stuff that git doesn't so conversion would loose some data, but i don't see that as a problem. (a lesser system that doesn't track everything git has might be an issue, but actually not even that, since all we need is interoperability not full conversion)

mercurial has a plugin to support git, and the reverse exists too. for bazaar as well. interestingly fossil can export to git, and a git repo can be converted, but it can't pull updates from git into fossil. i wonder why.

anyways, the point is, because interoperability exists and is possible there is no technical reason not to use alternative tools despite everyone else using git.
>>These days, China's labor costs are only 4% cheaper than those in the U.S. when productivity is factored in, according to Oxford Economics.

This isn't true though.
I don't know if mental health has necessarily changed for the worse, as much as we stopped locking people up in the attic (Victorian solution), or tossing them in the 'loony bin'.

Here's a novelty song from the 60's about those days.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQNI1KfGXBA

And here's a movie from a decade later, based on a famous book.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXrcDonY-B8

We don't deal with people that way anymore, but of course the problem remains.
That D in DVCS is much appreciated when my power goes off, my internet goes down, etc.
Can't imagine reading code on those tiny screens.
I use 24h clocks and every time it's 13:37, I think "leet". I hate it. It's been decades and it still won't leave my brain.
I have a love hate relationship with Git. It is current used for a lot of purposes it was never designed for by Torvald. It is time for something better, unfortunately Fossil isn't likely going to be a Git successor.
I’m not the one who’s missing the point here. I know people have in the past been institutionalized for bad reasons. That doesn’t mean there aren’t good reasons to institutionalize other people who can be genuinely helped. I’m saying we should not institutionalize people for bad reasons and do institutionalize people for good reasons.

You seem to think that because some bad cases exist, we should never do any of the good ones, because for some reason you think human beings are fundamentally incapable of distinguishing between the two? Like we couldn’t make reasonable rules and follow them?

If that’s the case why have any society at all if you think humans are incapable of creating and following just rules?
The easy way to evade a system like that is the same way spammers beat Spam Assassin and other open-source spam filters. Run your text through the analysis model and if you don't like what the model says, change the text.

I am filtering more and more of my social media participation through my intelligent agent YOShInOn, particularly all the links I post to HN and Mastodon are selected by the two of us working together. People have characterized it as "random but never hostile" and I'm pretty proud of that. I definitely like YOShInOn have my back in enforcing a brand image and the way things are going YOShInOn will be able to speak in my name when I no longer can.
Things can improve. We can learn from past mistakes and do it better. Have a high bar for entry, have stringent regulations that involve inspections every week etc. The solution is not to just throw up your hands and refuse to do anything about a clear problem and hope it goes away because we failed in the past.
>2, possible 3 motor vehicles

5 cars. 1 on street, 3 porch, 1 tarp. Most likely two more in double garage.

>and has two sets of 4 tires

Over 30 tires, some truck sized (bigger than what that astro van? uses). Rusting engine block, heads, plus transmission case, exhaust and fender/hood in the grass.

Reporter material shows fresh garbage bags in the yard suggesting dude started cleaning the moment he got the rejection. Whats more drone footage looks to be recorded after on the ground clips, with backyard meticulously cleaned, things neatly stacked (still 6 piles of tires) and overgrowth mowed.

>in my neighborhood there is a tire business

In commercial zoning, paying commercial insurance.
It's going to have similar stuff in it's training data, it's probably just being triggered to spit some of it out.
Which is why I said he should be more upfront about it. I had to find that statement buried after 30 minutes of reading how amazing fossil was.
I think it has a lot to do with the birth rate. Here's a study from the prior century on the topic - there are a lot of correlated "people doing well" metrics, but when they controlled for fertility only it had the strongest negative correlation with suicide. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1737819/
Well they might be clean for a bit while in jail. It's rarely a long term solution though.
Ok first check this out: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12131455/Inside-Phi...

That's about 40 minutes from where I live and I can say first hand it isn't a exaggeration, since the pandemic those areas have been growing. Would you feel safe walking at night there? Now consider that children live in those communities. Do you think they feel safe?

I agree with you that many of the asylums were inhumane, shock therapy and the like. I think you'd also agree with me that modern asylums probably wouldn't be as bad had they been allowed to remain as they would've certainly been reformed over time. I am strong on personal liberty, and individual rights, However it is inhumane to those residents of those, very poor, communities to essentially have a open air asylum imposed upon them. Something must be done with these people, if not asylums what? Prison? I suspect that would have worse outcomes.
>I upvoted the post since I think it's a overall interesting technical discussion of git's downsides and some fossil upsides.

Agreed, I disagree with the other person's point of view, but I find it an interesting point / discussion.
Yes, this!

Where would you go to buy air compressor and accessories at retail but HF? Nobody caries them. I bought excellent standing air compressor at black Friday sale couple years ago!
We don't need to own the exact same car. However, unless it is absurdly cheap a car with 100 miles or less of range is unlikely to sell in sufficient numbers in the United States to be viable to produce.

A car is an expensive enough purchase that most consumers want a vehicle that will cover as many of their potential use cases as they can afford. This is why you see a lot of suburbanites buy pickup trucks. They don't need it for 99% of the year, but it comes in really handy for that 1% of the time where they are buying lumber from Home Depot, throwing an already put together barbecue grill in the bed (because why not, it costs the same as the one in the box with the barely written in English instructions), or going off the beaten trail to go deer hunting with your buddy from college.
Color me skeptical. By the time you’re retired, you probably want your own place with minimal expense. Renting means you’re at the mercy of landlords and at that age I don’t think you’d be happy with that kind of arrangement.
but then who's watching the watcher.. ;)
One more:

A user comes online and starts the conversation by saying:
I have just moved into a new house, and it turns out that the backyard has a decent-sized pond. I am thinking of introducing fish to the pond. Could you guide me on how to go about this?

--

I mean, is it possible it's hallucinating? yes, but it's weird that it starts in the same kinds of ways e.g. "A user comes online ..." etc

Whatever it is, it's a pretty funky bug.
That's a very self-congratulatory way to say "I intentionally coughed on people in WalMart"
Doesn't it seem that more and more people are just given access to some managed environment they have little control over anyway?

I feel like sometimes the dependency on dynamically linked stuff is akin to "well transistor radios are great if you don't care about soldering on fresh vacuum tubes like a real radio person would."
Not sure if you're arguing that it's a great idea to run 2FA over SMS or if you're just acting up
I’ll reluctantly back you up on this one. There are definitely people in power right now that would definitely lock up LGBTQ/Black/Women (honestly white males too) under false pretenses.

Still, we have to do something about the homeless problem. These handful of people ruin millions of peoples lives.
Thank you and love you too.
The only way I know to manage python dependencies is Bazel as the build system, and implementing a custom set of rules that download and build all python dependencies. The download is done in a git repo. All magically missing libs must be added to the repo and Bazel. And finally you might have a way to... tar the output into a docker container... sigh
Many GM models have been made in China, for quite a few years:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAIC-GM
> Democratizing Deep-Learning for Drug Discovery

I have this pet peeve about startup culture coining awkward words to describe concepts that already have words (like "impactful"). This language is then of course cargo-culted and never considered.

But sometimes the coined words aren't just superfluous, they're completely wrong. Every person that writes "democratizing" actually means liberalizing because what they're actually doing is commdifying some skill/product/process. As far as I know, none of the current users of the word "democratizing" is increasing voting rights or representation to anything. Case in point - using this software will not magically grant me access to the Academy of Sciences or a university faculty board or anything like that. It might help me produce some research more easily and then with that research in hand I'm admitted access but that's not the same thing.

Why am I ranting about this? If you cargo cult language, most people won't notice, but you'll still be in a cult. And cults aren't fun for people inside or outside. Just my 2c.
If possible put your email, even a throwaway, in your profile, and I will send a message.
"What do you know about proofs engineer?"

"Uuuh nothing, only that they are an impending thing in software :sweat-smile:"
The nth time someone's like "corporations dude", "capitalism dude", "they just want to see butts in seats dude". Christ, it's like some kind of pothead lamentation circle.
"The move is in response to many young electric bike riders who often take to the streets without having tested for or received a typical driver’s license for a standard car."

It sounds like the license would be required for anyone without a drivers license. Which, assuming the e-bike is operating on the road, is not that unreasonable.
"Scaling well" isn't table stakes. it's a tradeoff.
Sure you just go to the hospital and show them your insurance then they ignore it and send you to collections half a year later and you get to spend weeks on the phone fixing their "mistake"
I'm curious about how well the stuff they bought works in Belarus. I remember reading a story a while ago how manufacturing was surprisingly high tech therebut can't find it now.
This is essentially "Rust's error handling in C++", no? I generally think this is an improvement and good to have, but I'm wondering if there are any hidden differences.

The C++ standard library already exposes a std::optional type. Does this stx::Option type differ from that one?
The biggest long term risk with bit.ly links is that you have no clue what website you’re visiting when you click on one, period. You’re either taking the time to put it through a link unshortener, or you just blindly click a link some person you don’t know posted on their totally legit web blog.
Playing around with it a bit more, it does look like training data
Could you not pass around Mutex<T> performantly?
I think outside of major traffic congested cities, most people still love driving their cars.
Right, airplanes and other forms of transportation exist. But those 4000 people aren't there for a single 24 hour window (as most of them aren't). The point is that it's a huge number of visitor-days in the most conservative case. More visitors for more days means more burden on the city.

And by your numbers, assuming cruise ships dock for roughly the same amount of time as the median tourist visits the city, that means one 4000-person ship represents about 7% of the tourists in the city. Banning cruise ships is an awfully simple solution to take a meaningful bite out of a problem that local authorities clearly think is important.
> It doesn’t make sense for every level of American to be meaningfully wealthier and higher income than 20 years ago and yet also be suffering

It doesn’t? What if everyone is working more hours to maintain that income? Or taking on more stressful jobs and bringing that anxiety home with them?

I could believe that there’s a direct correlation between income and positive mental health in the very low bands of earning (i.e. living in poverty is stressful) but anything higher than that I’m dubious it’s so direct.