skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, if you've ever managed a shared unix system that uses ssh keys for login, you know that a large fraction of users cannot manage them.

Among the steps of generating a key pair, getting the public key (not the private one) into their authorized_keys file (which is in a hidden directory, for pete's sake) without introducing any extra characters or line breaks or getting the wrong permissions on the file, getting their ssh client programs to use the proper private key for the host they are trying to log in to, or figuring out ssh-agent, there are just way too many opportunities to screw up or get confused.
Is the cost of getting phished really lower than the cost of learning a password manager for your dad?
Where's the contradiction? Are you saying that "not being able to trust your thoughts" implies that materialism is false?

> This article was written by someone with very poor philosophical training.

Strange to throw shade on the author when your position is that an idea that's been taken seriously by philosophers for 2000+ years is obviously contradictory. Maybe some humility is in order?
Most people are more at risk from bad passwords and website breaches than from home burglary.
As Covid-19 cases rose, so did childhood type-1 diabetes – no one knows why
Yeah, complete fuck up. You click "open image in new tab" and than this…

But saving it work at least. Than you need a large screen. :-) It's 7,763 × 4,684 pixels.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10188808

I would also recommend the work by some of Daniel Ingram's influences such as Mahasi Sayadaw's 'Progress of Insight' or 'Manual of Insight'.
I think the Xbox reference from op was just about the naming scheme of appending an X; it's all "Xbox one x", Xbox series x" etc. Not in terms of the software itself being a natural predecessor of Xbox.
> The standard penalty for a violation is $5,000, which is a fraction of the value of the bonus space developers receive from the agreements. For example, the owners of 325 Fifth Avenue have been assessed a total of $54,000 in penalties since 2015. By contrast, the bonus floor area that the developers gained could be worth approximately $80 million if used for residential space, based on 2022 sales prices provided by Jonathan J. Miller, a New York City real estate appraiser.

When the penalty is this much lower than the benefit, it's just the cost of doing business. I wonder if this same problem would happen if the fine was scaled to better reflect the increase in value.
>“Developers received something that was disproportionately valuable,”

[Edit: This is what happened.] It was not an equal exchange. Developers gained from extra floor space amounting to millions, while fines levied amounted to just thousands or tens of thousands of dollars. Up the fines to millions for starters.

[Edit: On another note, the private real estate market is bonkers. There needs to be tighter regulations, and more supply in the form of public market housing, etc. Many in New York getting priced out in the last 20 years.]
A lot of good information.

But my cynical worker viewpoint is that the problem is really that upper management doesn't do the actual work and that is by design. It's a class separation. They are there to crack the whip and collect the spoils.

The only way for upper management to really understand what's going on and give useful input would be for them to be directly involved on a day-to-day basis.

In other words, they would have to do actual work.

That's not going to happen. So the best they can do is to stay out of the way of people who are actually working, avoid making decrees, and maybe try to keep the other managers from interfering with the work also.

Maybe another approach would be for the workers to share more equally in the spoils so that they would be naturally inclined to integrate business improvements and goals. But that's never going to happen.

The structure is much more directly related to a caste system than people may acknowledge.
I’m very tempted to try this!
>I'd argue that ALL wars are foundationally resource wars -

I mean, this much should be obvious. When Prussia, Russia and Austria partitioned Poland, they weren't exactly happy about the polish citizens they acquired.
Compelled vaccination — forcing people to endure the pain of a needle and a few hours of feeling sore in their arm — is indeed completely different from locking people up in mental institutions for decades.
For me that would be the early first person games, in particular Ultima Underworld and Wolfenstein 3D.

Also the Settlers and Command and Conquer were quite important.

And not forget the time spent looking for gasoline for the chainsaw.
The problem is that your linked peltier consumes 22.8W of power to pump those 10W. That is a horrible efficiency, and completely useless for most applications.

At that point you're probably better off with plain old resistive elements when trying to heat, or literally anything else if you are trying to cool.

Being limited to a small temperature difference and power capacity per area isn't that big of a deal when you stuff a whole bunch of them together, especially considering the goal is to replace traditional building-sized heat pumps. Needing tens of thousands of them only matters due to cost - and that's way less of an issue when it is more efficient than the alternatives.
I could not find any definition for “omniperiodic”.
Amazing how low the "top 3%" is in the UK: £104,000 8-/

That wouldn't be in the top 10% in the US.

Inequality is skyrocketing, and the "labour" party has become tory, not even "tory light"...
I agree. SaaS was supposed to be a model that was highly beneficial for vendors selling to corporations. Once it penetrated the consumer market it became death by 1,000 cuts. Now everyone's life is loaded down subscriptions for things that 20 years ago would've been bought once. I miss the days of owning software. I guess I can be thankful it pushed me towards open source.
Also between the middle ages and the 19th century: e.g. The Logic and Grammar of Port Royal were very influential - c.f. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/port-royal-logic/
I always thought BeyondCorp was intended to replace the VPN infrastructure with (effectively) a TLS reverse proxy gated by rules, SSO, device posture inspection, etc.

That’s how I always interpreted the marketing and technical documentation anyway.

I would be surprised if they’re not already running PAWs for things like administrative access to production GCP primitives and similar, even if they’re also running PAM, hardware authentication, and so on. I know Microsoft does for admin privileges to the Azure fabric.
Is the cost of lung cancer lower than smoking?

Some people will just never change a behaviour.
I'd wager that >99% of all burglaries are looking for physical possessions which can be sold for a quick buck. Not looking for random notebooks of passwords. So locking it in a safe might not be optimal because it will be like putting a spotlight on it.
So Savory is unable to show any empirical way in which his method works to help the situation, and we should just take their word for it?

And asking for evidence is reductionist?
I think people see the pictures and it looks like it might be an improvement but it's the motion of expressions that really makes it look weird/uncanny. A human face is always moving and it reads very wrong to see it move wrong.
Social media expression can reveal personality
I read OP's mention of third party cookies as an example of browsers supposedly moving in a more privacy focused direction, not as being related to authentication.
My password manager is built into my browser. I just push the button to login.
> How was it misleading? By his own admission he didn’t take the vaccine.

You posted the video as proof the Pfizer CEO hasn't taken the video, without mentioning when it was taken, and without mentioning that he followed public health recommendations. You made it seem like the CEO decided not to take it because he doesn't trust it, but he didn't take it as to not be selfish. Do you now admit that you posted this in a highly misleading way?
There is absolutely nothing about Greenwald, Taibbi, or Adams that is in any way unintelligible or irrational.
We started this challenge on ClickHouse's Twitter: https://twitter.com/ClickHouseDB/status/1635651016895918080

Nice to see a follow-up, although it feels secondary.
I just noted the same. Incentives, or in this case disincentives are powerful. I think it will at least make some change.
I'm neither surprised, nor would I immediately have assumed that it was unwarranted if someone had told me the FBI was looking into a senator.

(I have no idea which party the senator belongs to and I don't think it even matters)
Personally, I like that Bun aims to be "Node, but better". That's all I ever wanted.

Deno's desire to rethink server-side JS adds friction in service of goals I don't value. They're gradually giving ground their aspirations (e.g., in my memory it was previously a point of pride to not interoperate with NPM), but it's still not a drop-in replacement and I don't think they want it to be.

Bun's goals align with mine, so it's the one I prefer using.
Science isn't about belief or religion; it's about objective inquiry and understanding the world based on evidence.

It's okay to question and be critical, but dismissing scientific consensus without proper examination won't lead us anywhere.

Let's put aside the conspiracy theories and embrace the wonders of knowledge and progress that science offers ;)
Base M2 tops out at 24GB.
It makes me want to cry. Pass the Kleenex.
Aaaah Tomacco!

Slightly off-topic trivia: there is a reference to Tomaccos in the story-mode of the game CoreBreach (https://www.corecode.io/corebreach/). [Probably cannot be obtained anymore for quite a few years now - certainly won't run with modern OSs]. Further references are made to Blade Runner, Soylent Green, Terry Pratchett, etc, etc

There were also a number of hidden Simpson and Family Guy related easter-eggs, none of which were ever discovered.
For context: Fraunhofer employee here.

Fraunhofer is a not for profit organization, consisting of around 75 independent institutes. Our income comes from three sources: (1) publicly funded R&D, for example EU grants. We apply just as everyone else, so we compete with universities and private companies. (2) Industry grants. This is where the “applied science” of our mission statement comes into play. These grants are mostly from SMEs, but we also have huge industry grants. And finally (3) the base funding from the Germany’s government. The idea is that common cost like buildings and infrastructure is covered by the base funding.

The base funding depends on the ratio of income from (1) and (2). About 40-50 percent should originate from industry (2). If an institute deviates from this, their base funding will be reduced. Bottom line: There is a strong incentive to do research, but also to transfer that knowledge to industry partners. Failing to do both will reduce the base funding. Its a delicate balancing act, for each institute.
The problem with the community events approach is that the students you are mentoring rarely have the time to commit. It can happen, but it's rare.

If you just want to scratch that teaching and mentoring itch, you can opt out of most of the bullshit by avoiding the R1 tenure stream. A good route to take is Professor of Practice at a non-elite institution (just email the chair -- if you're an asset and don't want a TT position the wheels can turn surprisingly quickly), and if you happen across a grad student worth investing in sourcing a small grant and co-advising.
Both horseshoe and the Overton window seems to rely on the assumption that all opinions on all subjects on the political spectrum stay stationary in relationship to each other, but that is total BS.

50 years ago you could have opinions on two different subject on the left, but in 2023 one of those opinions could have flipped but the other stayed the same.

Both the horseshoe and Overton window do not really account for these topical flips of opinion which renders both inadequate for explaining the ebb and flow of politics.
Also Mondragon, with 12 Billion Eur revenue, and ~82,000 employees

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation
This old america did not believe in public investment enough to ensure humane conditions in asylums.
Or at least scaled in repeat offenses.

First time 5k as a warning.

Second time, you knew what you were doing 50k

Third time, fuck you, if we can do third strike laws for citizens we can do it for businesses. 50m fine.

Bet there'd be a lot fewer repeat offenses
I agree a house is a lot lock in, but there are many other nuanced pros and cons to home ownership.

- Homeowners can modify their dwelling. Renovations, painting, etc.

- Banks lend millions of dollars to ordinary people through mortgages. Subsequent loans can also be taken out against existing properties. This enables enormous leverage, with commensurate risk. A good way to get rich (or lose it all).

- Homeowners can be confident in their cost of living staying static long term, whereas rent typically increases every year. Decades later this can mean an initially pricey mortgage payment looks cheap compared to renting.

- Renters have the risk of being forced to move at the whim the landlord. Usually there are some protections like minimum notice periods and laws against arbitrary evictions, but there's always some chance whereas homeowners can stay put for generations provided they pay their continue to pay their mortgage and property taxes.
Fun fact: cosmetic Botox led directly to the discovery that it could be used to treat chronic migraine — some people who received it for cosmetic reasons noticed that it improved their headache symptoms and reported this to their doctors.
So what do you suggest doing to turn it into ‘many smaller chicken coops’ and how is it more secure?
What is the end game for Reddit here? Losing free and motivated workers and gutting their communities, is that something they feel will blow over and they will be able to replace with their own figureheads? I haven’t gone back and I was addicted to the site for over 15 years.
Privacy and security are the same thing. You cannot have one without the other.
Without a delineation, how do you argue that it is effective? How how do you argue that any treatment is effective if not statistics like these? And it’s not fair to say no vaccine survives this delineation because I specifically used Polio as an example of an effective vaccine.
> To drive economic growth. France's gdp per capita is lower today than it was 15 years ago. In the US it's 45% higher than it was 15 years ago. France's corporate system wasn't working, and high taxes were a key reason from lots of studies.

actually, high corp taxes can drive economic growth, because they give incentive to companies to reinvest into the business and not into shareholder's pockets.
If you want to play with fancy UI with some modern project management platforms or just paying for Jira, that's totally fine.

If you just want things to work for years ahead and focus on what you do, redmine will be my pick, it has everything I need, nothing fancy, nothing more, get the job done, from issue tracking, to git, to wiki, to file management, to use/clients/customer access, you have them all, solid.
Likewise. I used it 10 years ago and it looks the same. Good luck trying to get non-technical people to use it.
Why automation makes your job harder
AFAIK there are competing javascript runtimes including Bun, Deno, Rome, Node and other runtimes that I don't know about. So which one to use?
no, companies that pass certain financial thresholds get access to capital on very different terms. Access to capital, when managed well, is opportunity to build countless "moats" and take advantage of low-profit long-term market changes. As a small business who has to pay real bills each month or fail, there is no contest.

source-- actual small tech business experience in the USA
My problem is how to stay in science, and outside of academia? Not sure.
that's what disproportionately means
This should be banned, but we all know nothing will be done until there are 10 penguins left in the wild and maybe 20 whales left. Even then, only limits will be imposed which will be easy to get around.
Sheesh.

Nepotism is raging, notably within academia settings particularly for "nepotism babies".

Even University of Texas exempt anti-nepotism for many positions.

https://independentprobe.com/2022/11/21/nepotism-and-undue-p...
That one was probably related to the recently discovered bug where deleting a users with thousands of posts will lock out the database, thus causing a self-DOS. And since the deletion will propagate to other instances, other federated instances might be down too depending on how much federated contents that must be deleted in that instance.
Men don’t communicate (as much).

The rest of your hypothesis rests on an idea that women evolved (into a species?) with reinforced traits focusing on appearance. Disagree here Because Men and women didn’t evolve into different “species” And neither do we find similarities between them in this regard.

Selection pressure is an idea that tries to explain the trends in evolution. It is just an idea. It would be careless to trace everything in current state of behaviors to evolutionary changes.

You would be better off leaving evolution out of the picture.

(Edit: I’m deeply disturbed by your view. The people who advocate for child-love use similar reasoning.)
For me this is a much bigger story than people think. Get enough text that someone writes on social media, feed it through an A.I., and get a better psychodiagnosis than they are likely to get from a psychiatrist.
Yes I was only highlighting the point, not arguing against it.
You cannot save all people - too true. But remember that you, actually all of us, are indirectly the victim of other peoples' mistakes:

- we lose contact with people because they get locked out of their email

- we pay more in bank account fees to subsidise fraud compensation

- we have our personal information stolen because others chose weak passwords

Given how much we suffer from other peoples' poor choices, there is a huge incentive to somehow stop people from making poor choices. By analogy, we all benefit from fences by cliffs because the family of the unlucky soul who wandered off it, the emergency services and their funders all suffer too. If it weren't for values like personal freedom, aesthetics, financial cost and an apathy towards accidents, there would be no clifftop in the world without a fence by it.
I've been thinking about doing this for a while. I grind and clench my teeth quite a bit at night. How often did you have to get it done? Did your insurance cover it or is this something you can use HSA money for? What's your cost per treatment?

Also does it in any way effect your chewing strength or ability to make the full range of facial expressions?

Many Thanks!
As a user, I loved Redmine. Well designed, has enough features but not too many. As a maintainer I haven't experienced it, but I'd be willing to try it.
>The only discernible difference between TOTP and a site-generated password is in how knowledge of the secret is proven. With TOTP, knowledge of the secret is proven without sending it to the website. With a site-generated password, knowledge of the secret is proven by sending that secret to the website.

The whole point of a passphrase is that IT DOESNT CHANGE HANDS EVER.

The reality though is that computers subvert the system of passphrasing because the complexity required for passphrases within a computing systems is easy for computers to beat but hard for people to recall

So you have a perfect situation where the historical context is maintained (person will remember their self-generated passphrase) but the system also can probably guess any passphrase that a human could remember without any additional tools

So now, given that we REQUIRE more complexity than people can recall, we force people to use additional tools for creating/managing their passphrases which subvert the entire principle of a passphrase. Namely:

IT DOESNT CHANGE HANDS EVER

So the whole system is corrupted at it's root and there is no way to solve this problem with the current structure
This is one of those things that always made me wonder. Theory is lagging behind practice by significant margins.
You’re not a dinosaur for hating the continued consumerization of products and services targeted toward use cases that are expert in nature.

Sure, have a simpler GUI for Jira Service Desk users in a non-technical customer service role. Give me a different GUI that’s not driven by designers looking to reinvent. I don’t need that, I don’t want that, and it just wastes my time.
Of course. It has ton of plugins of all kinds one can imagine.
The other option is provisioning dev servers as VMs on big hosts, which some other companies do. That’s where the build and development happens, using an IDE locally on the issued laptop which uses remoting.
The absolute worst is situations like this:

User: I have a problem I haven't been able to google. Whenever this very specific situation occurs, I am having this problem. Any advice?

Other Users: (Lots of ideas, no solution.)

User: Nevermind, I figured it out, thanks!

...WHAT DID YOU DO TO FIX IT?
I think the games became more popular because the hardware became cheaper and more capable. Before the early-to-mid 90s a PC or compatible might cost $2000, outside the budget for a lot of families. Buying a computer just for games didn't make sense when a specialized game system was so much cheaper.
The race of the two professors, obviously.
The trend of employing optogenetics and optogenetic-like functional tech to this problem I find frightening. And keep in mind "opto" isnt just visible light.

The other big idea (which the paper mentions) is the coupling of systems being sensed. For example in the medical research they now couple fMRI (bloodflow) with EGG (coarse firing activity) and also EGG with pulsed ultrasound neuromodulation. This is interesting because the metabolic process is almost a "mind if its own".
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me again and agin, every single time, as predictably as clockwork, for over a century...
There is more to it; many companies have security organizations that insist on bringing the same security concepts as they have on prem to the cloud; many regulators do as well, so this requires a lot of what we see in terms of the unnecessary complexity in the cloud in terms of networking.
> Krill serves as an ingredient in aquaculture feed and, to a lesser extent, in pet foods and omega-3 supplements for human use.

Pretty depressing that is why they are doing this. Those needs could be satisfied with completely different inputs
This is the standard issue with fines. When they are less than the reward for non-compliance it is not worth complying. My town has many fines that are issued per day with increases at certain milestones.
Maybe with Gen AI potentially lowering the cost of software development, it will be economically viable to go back to the "pay once and own" model...
Grafting generally only works within families. I.e. you can't graft a chestnut onto an apple tree.

I doubt many (if any) shade trees would support a fruit.

That said, families can be surprisingly large. Most citrus all come from the same four parent plants and you can mix most of them. Apples and plums are also closely related
Nobody does corruption at the scale of the US where the worst scams are completely legal.
I don’t really care where it runs, or if it’s one-time purchase vs subscription. It’s just the “paying indirectly for ‘free’ software products” vs “paying for software” that I care about.
Somewhat related: https://shed.bike/
Yasumasa subduing Tsuchigumo (dirt spider) evokes similar thoughts as the iconography of St. George defeating the dragon. Many layers of meaning.
Saas is also a way of combating piracy imo.