skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I want to see an amendment to the United States constitution for the right to encryption.
They could easily pseudonymize the data by removing payment info, personal info, etc. but keeping the games because why wouldnt you let people keep their games as a game company
Ah, it would have been the correct way to transfer it to English, it says, not that it's in any way original.
Good practice should really follow the joke about airliners: the ideal flight deck crew consists of pilot and dog. The pilot is there to look after the dog, the dog is there to make sure the pilot doesn't touch anything.

Even the RBMK reactors, which had lecturers in the 1960s pointing out safety flaws, needed human intervention (and quite a lot of materials fraud) to actually go boom. TMI similarly needed some humans to fix it until it was broken (also why there is a genuine good-faith lobbying argument to mandate less maintenance sometimes, especially as higher-quality equipment wears slower).

You'd still need security, and frankly security for the security, though.
I have not seen the page on PC, all I can say is that it works very well on mobile.
Peter Struycken [1] is a Dutch artist who produced a lot of works with pen plotters [2]. He is the brother of Carel Struycken [3]. He is befrended with Walter Lewin [4], who also owns a collection of his art works [5].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Struycken

[2] http://pstruycken.nl/EnDyn.html?D,tag=P&w

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carel_Struycken

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Lewin

[5] http://pstruycken.nl/EnDyn.html?L&l&ColWLewin
I have written this little project above and as a consequence I had to learn how to compute certain astrological aspects. And oh boy, astrology isn't just not working because "it can't work". It is also terribly imprecise in its assumptions..

In theory you could calculate the astronomical part (position of certain bodies even if some are just fictional like Lilith, Iris etc.) and check for correlation with astrological predictions. But each astrological system makes so many soft assumptions that you can't decide which system is the true one.

For example you have division of a horoscope in 12 houses. But there are multiple systems of that division (Whole sign, Placidus, Regiomontanus, Krusinski/Pisa/Goelzer) each at odds with each other...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_(astrology)

You might be familiar with concept of Age of Aquarius. Well estimates of when is this going to happen vary from 1844 to 3573 CE depending on astrologer...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Aquarius

https://www.astro.com/swisseph/swisseph.htm
Or at least source. Without this it is useless.

It may be technically open source, but without any benefits.

See say https://iconbuddy.app/bxl/amazon https://iconbuddy.app/devicon/google for obvious problems that I can spot. How many are from more obscure services?

How many are CC-BY or requiring attribution? How many are from some license-washing dubious source stealing icons and claiming to be CC0 licensed?
Scam Altman moving on from OpenAI before llama causes it to crash
> I'm not seeing any obvious advantage that World Id will have over these existing systems.

I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but you don't see the obvious advantage because you are looking for the obvious benefit from the perspective of a user.

Having a database of international retina information (which is practically an immutable property), spending history, and connections graph, is probably invaluable to intelligence agencies, oppressive regimes (or, you know, just simply "regimes" as they are all oppressive to some degree when the opportunity comes, as the covid years taught us), big tech/pharma, military industrial complex, news organizations and other arms of the ruling class.
Can someone tell me which transport protocols and ports this uses or can be configured to use? Moreover, do clients have NAT traversal capabilities (no pun intended)?

This is always so hard to figure out for B2B libraries.
Mark Watson's Lisp books
Young people are also flocking to Taylor Swift. Doesn't mean much other than young people flock to fads. Well, everybody does but especially young people.
I was. When I saw a chain of repeated questions I had to add mine.
Atheists need to confront the fact that they have won. In most of the Europe, including the east and in Northern America, traditional religions have crumbled under almost three centuries of secularist onslaught. Major Christian denominations, as well as Judaism, have decreased in relevance and power, to the point when even politicians nominally belonging in these groups actively work against their orthodoxy.

Saying you are religious in public invites ridicule, and proclaiming your political positions are tied to your religion is bordering on political suicide, take SNP leadership elections as one example.

Even in US, the 'nones' are becoming the largest "denomination".
Overall, I think most believers understand that.

Western society is now less religious than in any point in recorded history. And atheists, especially those of the 'new' movement like Dawkins, need to understand that it's of their making. If they don't like parts of it, it's up to them to handle it.
Figured out why, it loads ~80MB worth of images.

https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-adamfuhrer-com-pen-...
Billing information = PII, so it is subject to privacy regulations. In many jurisdictions the law allows to store and process PII no longer than needed. If an account becomes inactive and all other retention deadlines expire, keeping the data may be a violation.

To be on the safe side and to satisfy users I would allow users in such cases to download the digitally signed account data and offer the possibility to upload it again.
I can't see it happening, since Martin Kearns died they've done nothing and I expect it to stay that way. Perhaps they'll do the odd gig here or there, but tbh I'm happy not hearing a Bolt Thrower album with a different drummer.
It's lore like any other, and it's fun to research, discuss and share with others. No need to go nuclear over people playing silly, harmless games with each other.
There's a very loud group of venerated tech bros whose strategy for the last 5+ years has been to promise a brave new world of magic technological solutions to an ailing economy and divided society. Most of these solutions have turned out to be overstated at best, or an outright lie at worst.

We've internalised all the dystopian rhetoric and compounded it with the disappointment of false solutions, while these charlatans have siphoned off tonnes of VC money and sailed off into the sunset (or into federal prison.)
The film is a satire of fascists propaganda, and as good satire often it, it is also an good example of fascist propaganda, just like Snow Crash is satire of Cyberpunk while being a good Cyberpunk.

The book isn't exactly fascist though. Verhoeven said he didn't read the book and does not plan to, so he is satirising somewhat superficially.

Heinlein did explore a lot of various political systems in his books, and I think Starship Troopers is focusing most on voter engagement - how people who vote should know something about what they vote on, and that is why only those who served (which includes military but also other "national service" like being a worker colonising planets or postman or whatever) get vote.

Is that fascist? I don't think so. Is it a good political system? I don't think so either but it is a good enough idea for a book.
Having run into the is recently when our cloud API changed a value we relied on to be optional, it is indeed a breaking change in swift.
Thats not much of a what-if: It would make sense to buy games and then download a cracked version instead of the official one, simply because the one you bought can be disabled & taken away at any moment. And, of course, cracked games have better linux compat because they dont have the DRM(s).

Buy it to support the franchise and get sequels, of course.
Not sarcastic as the AI comment is true enough for the sarcasm to not work
>Which so far I consider the best single-player gaming experience in history

The only use case for "eternal sunshine of the spotless mind" memory erasing technology would be so you can play Outer Wilds for the first time again.

+1 for Outer Wilds
Defaults are powerful, and IE was default.

If you’re a large bureaucracy in the early 2000s you went with whatever was default - and that was IE.

Defaults were seen as so powerful, that MS was anti-trusted for this. They did it anyways at the time because the juice was worth the squeeze.
Interesting, I will check that more analytically as soon as I will be back at the console,

but I am not sure - provisionally - that it can be a good idea to relate strictly human neurology to ANNs, if based on phenomena as opposed to structural issues. You do not have that problem when staying with natural language.
Death metal is indeed very silly. What I'm not sure of is whether its fans don't realise it's silly, embrace the silliness, or have simply moved beyond such pathetic human dichotomies as serious and silly.
I'm not sure I follow - I didn't think you were making some deep point about civil liberties vs individual rights vs group rights.

My point is I can decide to marry a man or a woman now and before I could only decide to marry women. Currently I despise the idea of marriage so I'm not doing either, but there's many things I have the freedom to do that I choose not to. I still like to have that freedom. It seems you were making some deeper point than me or you have a different idea of what makes "a group" (since you called abortion a group right even though it applies to every woman).
Different mental starting points and a healthy dose of randomness and luck. To me, learning maths always felt like playing puzzle games. The more you play different games, the more you get used to the "secrets" behind the puzzles and the easier your brain makes successful connections. But when you're learning calculus, you barely have time to make those connections. Give the same starting point and same experiences, brains will make different connections and learn things a little different.
I'll bet 1,000,000 Worldcoin it tanks within a month.
1px-Wide Font
Organised Religion is good for people, because it keeps them from believing even crazier ideas, and still tells you to see a doctor when you're sick

Most of the people who go to Organised Religion don't really believe in God, they're just in it for the tea and biscuits, ie it's a social club.

If you really believed in God and Heaven you'd become a monk or nun, logically you'd spend your finite life maximising your chance of infinite reward

Without Organised Religion you get antivax people, way more dangerous than people who spend 500 years building a cool building
> If people don't want to work, then lower the pensions to realistic figures.

People don't want that too, of course.

> also what's the point of having a Parliament that doesn't decide anything

Parliament decides most things, it's just that there is the option to force stuff through them in limited types of scenarios and a limited amount of times (which they can refuse with a motion of no confidence). So it's not like the President can just rule by decree and do whatever they want.

> What's the point of democracy if you don't let people decide anything?

What can I say, democracy has it's flaws. People are easily attracted to empty populists that promise stuff that doesn't make sense, or would be downright catastrophic; politicians are incentivised to think short term (next election cycle) instead of medium and long term (nobody got reelected because they gave money to a nuclear research programme that is scheduled to finish in 30 years time). Having politicians with the guts to make reforms that are needed, even if unpopular, is crucial for the long term health of a country. Sadly it's quite hard to have that without spiralling into authoritarianism, and downright impossible to differentiate between that and a politician doing things for their own (friends/business partners) benefit - e.g. did Macron force this reform through because, as he says, he believes it's necessary to avoid French debts spiralling out of control, or because it will push more people into private retirement schemes and he's getting a cutback from that?
> Now you're probably asking why Chrome is the dominant monopoly browser today, and that answer is also easy: Chrome incorporated what Firefox introduced but marketed themselves more aggressively

That's one way of putting it. But I think the article indirectly explained it better:

> We know that binding IE with Windows is the key to IE’s domination of the browser market.

Google did a similar thing with Chrome. They bound it to Google's services. You got nagged every time you visited www.google.com. Understandably google's more advanced stuff didn't work with IE. But it also often didn't work with Firefox. This is what mozilla had to say about that https://www.zdnet.com/article/former-mozilla-exec-google-has... :

A former high-ranking Mozilla executive has accused Google of intentionally and systematically sabotaging Firefox over the past decade in order to boost Chrome's adoption.

He is not the first Firefox team member to come forward and make such accusations in the past eight months; however, his allegations span far beyond current events and accuse Google of carrying out a coordinated plan that involved introducing small bugs on its sites that would only manifest for Firefox users.
> Second, why did IE lose to Chrome from the position of market domination while Windows has always been dominating the desktop OS market?

> Now I realized that the answers to the two questions are the same

Yes - Android and the iPhone.

The only real mobile browsers are Chrome and Safari, and Safari is only available within its walled garden, so to get a mobile-like development experience on desktop people used Chrome. It all followed from there.

(IE6 was Windows-only and tried to achieve lock-in with ActiveX, which let you run native COM controls in the browser. Hilariously inappropriate security model, but popular in the enterprise, and at one time mandated by the South Korean national ID system.)
Helm-Compose – The Docker-compose like tool for K8s development
A docker-compose like tool for multi helm chart deployment handling. Primarily meant to be used for development, to be able to quickly deploy all dependent services and tools from within one single yaml file.
Interesting. Did he have anything to do with "Glass Onion" other than a Zoom cameo playing among us alongside Angela Lansbury & Stephen Sondheim?

edit: imdb says no, I guess that's authoritative?
This doesn't make any sense. This makes sense if the account is inactive and has no active licenses to it, but like, if you buy game X with whatever the industry-current licensing is, and the expectation is that you have a license as long as you have an account, termination is silly. You have an active agreement (i.e., the license) to use the product. That's a contractual/business relationship.

You could just as easily delete all of the PII in the account by sending someone an email saying "your licenses are now attached to these codes, please use them to reactivate your licenses with a new account if you want to access them" but they don't. They just delete them. There are many ways to square this circle.
If he wanted to make all these sweeping changes then why did he alienate his staff?

Can you imagine all the time and money that was put into staffing Twitter? There is value to an organization and its unwritten human network upon which it operates. Then it was just blown away over night to appease some beanie wearing mouth breathers on the platform
I've always been curious about serious scholarship of religion.

I've wondered whether it is possible to be both, say, a Christian and an atheist simultaneously (e.g., not believing that Christ existed physically, but at the same time believing that following the tenets in the religion is the right thing to do for the greater good, or perhaps interpreting the Bible completely metaphorically).

I imagine that scholars can have serious disagreements over the meaning of the Bible or even its provenance without necessarily leaving the religion.
Just compile the Python
> "That no law shall be made preventing an informed and consenting adult from consuming whatever substance they so please."

That seems reckless, it includes medicines and pharmaceuticals, creatine, steroids, HGH, lip-fillers, stimulants... So either you effectively abolish the FDA and pharmacies, or downgrade them to mere advisories which people can ignore.
It's tongue-in-cheek.

"More young people are flocking to the flat earth theory, not everyone views this as a positive development"

See the sarcasm?
Musk Declares Fan Submitted X New Twitter Logo
Sorry, my imprecision. You spend ages trying to find proper expression, and yet... Well, this proves the importance of the effort.
In German they were called "Protokollsätze", which translates to "protocol sentences".
This is blogspam, but in case people come here because the title sounds interesting, check out text-generation-webui (https://github.com/oobabooga/text-generation-webui). It's a better solution to local LLMs than running in a Jupyter Notebook.
Looks like you spoke too soon, I'm clocking 340+ tokens per second with my improved Rust implementation, compared to 106 with the original C. That being said, I didn't share this for any reason other than to share ideas and promote learning. Cheers
Coercing nullishness/undefined-ness to false arises from languages like C. It is an unfortunate footgun, but not what most people think of when they think of Javascript's coercion weirdnesses.

Typescript supports this because it is a strict superset of Javascript.

They certainly could have made TS strict mode complain about it though.
The roommate, yes. The Tor thing was in Europe. My hypothetical was based on the terrible US legal system though which Europe mostly doesn’t share. A big reason the Tor folks relocated to places like Germany was exactly because there is a legal system there that actually respects the spirit and letter of the law.
They prevent you playing even single player content? I’m surprised that such a design passed certification.
“It’s less smoggy in LA.” Is the “it works on my machine” of climate change denial.

It’s a global problem, and acknowledging that isn’t moving the goal posts. It’s reminding you that a first down is not a touchdown.
We can. Just ignore anyone who works on "scaling things up". Its like paying attention to brainless robotic ants for too long.
I’m a 61-year-old software developer.

It’s been interesting (and infuriating), experiencing some of the conclusions that younger techs have reached about me, due to my gray hair.

I’m also a developer of Apple device software. That has resulted in even more abuse. There’s serious hate for Apple amongst techs.

Human nature likes pigeonholing other people into simple “sort buckets,” and we have many ways to do that. It actually takes conscious effort, to avoid it.
This careless approach with nulls kinda works for Clojure because of "nil punning" but is dangerous for other languages I guess
Less famous, but Brian Wecht, aka Ninja Brian from Ninja Sex Party, is also a theoretical physicist, though he's retired from academia.
It has to be worth a lot less than that today. The number of young people who visit websites ever in any given week is dropping. Reddit's usage among young people shot up after mobile apps were developed for it, not before. Domains just don't matter as much anymore.
No, then we’d need to write an English compiler, I’m talking about an output language.
Why is this supposed to be a thing to care about? I fail to recognize how someone's belief or disbelief in astrology significantly affects anything real. If believing in astrology helps them in being happier then why not?
You didn't answer them. Why isn't the consumer allowed to make the decision for themselves.

Yes there are liars and cheats out there as in everything. Why can't the consumer decide who is lying and who isn't and what is safe and what isnt
Automatic expiration timers for all laws.

A bicameral legislature where one half needs 2/3rds majority to pass laws, but the other half only repeals laws and needs only 50%.

(The latter is not my idea, it comes from Heinlein.)
I thought it was to minimize dust deposition on its main surface.
No matter whether there is a protective glass or not.

Could it be this simple?
Indeed; it's related to the whole tower of large numbers etc. There's no escaping the Halting Problem. It's just a matter of which level of halting "bites us".

Anyway, I hope I've convinced you that the appeal to physics is inside "Turing Machines are a reasonable model of how computations work." It's so weird to think about other more powerful machines exactly because they go against deeply-ingrained intuition about what the world is really like.

Moreover, physics really seems to prevent you from doing any "sick" by monkeying around either on the quantum or gravitational side. Did the laws of physics have to do that? I have no idea.

Perhaps someday we'll wind up elevating the (extended, quantum) Church-Turing thesis to a physical principle and rule out classes of physical law because they'd lead to violations of computational difficulty, in much the same way we rule out classes of physical law because they lead to violations of conservation of energy.
It seems like these people should be required to read Douglas Adams. Though they'd likely miss the point.
I have established multiple companies, some of which have grown significantly with over 600 employees. For quite some time, I've transitioned from development and mainly held executive roles such as CEO, Chairman, etc. Simultaneously, it's intriguing to note that I've mostly been unsuccessful in securing 'normal' jobs through interviews in the past (Google, McKinsey, Bain, Accenture etc).

I believe this poses a fascinating topic on the way people assess creativity and intelligence in general.

From my perspective, the crux of the issue lies in the inherent difficulty of accurately measuring creativity in comparison to quick problem-solving skills during job interviews. Consequently, it seems that corporations tend to favor the latter.
> We can still conclude materialism logically

I invite you to try!
I still do not understand how Apple gets away doing the same (or worse) with Safari on iOS.
Even then, a lot of the video may not be useful to a particular audience. Being able to scroll past a sequence of short animations could be even more valuable -- especially because then you have the opportunity to include more optional branches via links or tabs or user preferences, and make the content even more accessible without making it excessively long for all audiences.