skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
JetBrains aims to provide developers with enjoyable, creative, and thought-provoking tools. Their IDEs understand code and offer helpful suggestions to improve it. However, modern CI-centric workflows require a reliable quality gate in your build pipeline. To address this, JetBrains created Qodana, a code quality platform that uses inspections native to JetBrains IDEs and expands their smartness to the CI server.

With Qodana, development teams can automate code reviews, build quality gates, and enforce code quality guidelines enterprise-wide. The platform can analyze code written in 60+ languages, including Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, PHP, Kotlin, Python, Go, and C#. Qodana is now available commercially with some major improvements, and users can enjoy a 50% discount on their first year.
My point was, let's start with that large OID tree, for example.

And continue this concept downward. Except when it's inside your org, you're the registrar of your namespace's sub-OIDs, and so on. And there's precisely no reason not to have hierarchical sequential ids for everything. You need to generate ids on 100 servers? Good, give each server a namespace. You need to do that in a 100 processes on each server? Good, give a sub-namespace to those too.

And the best of all is that the above-organization OID part of the tree is ONLY needed if you show these ids outside your organization. Otherwise you can use the internal private part of the identifiers.

So what am I missing here? Maybe they need to be hard to guess, so add a random key part to them (distinct from the generated sequence part) as a "password". Done.
Unbelievable the LHC is already running for 15 years! When it was just finished it was still the heyday of funny flash animations on the internet, some of course joking about the LHC ending the world:

https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/469806
What precisely am I doing? please be specific.

As far as I can tell the only person that appears to be "masquerading" here is yourself: at least I'm open about who I am!
Rampant heatwaves threaten food security of entire planet, scientists warn
Braintree is a good chunk more expensive than Stripe for OP's needs if they're in the US.

Based on the info they shared:

• Braintree: 2.59% + $0.49

> Braintree fees: $17,570 cost for 20K txns/month ($15 AOV)

• Stripe: 2.9% + $0.30

> Stripe fees: $14,700 cost for 20K txns/month ($15 AOV)

So Stripe is around 16% cheaper for their use case on standard pricing alone.
Similar here, it feels like sort of lossy vector graphics of a fractal, brains are weird
Just commented the exact same thing without checking if someone else also posted, because it is not that well known for some reason.
I don't want to kneejerk, but verb classes with a call method, all a bit Javaey?
This isn't strictly true, at least in NL. Most domestic online businesses use iDeal for instant payments, but if you aren't shopping at an online retailer that explicitly supports it, you need to use a real credit card or Paypal as a pass-thru. Some businesses will support you sending a payment via IBAN, but then you're waiting days potentially for someone to reconcile the ledger manually and deliver your digital product.

Since I don't particularly enjoy having debt, Paypal is a nice middle ground as long as the fees aren't outrageous.
Yeah, I think the worst behavior to observe is when people make hard decisions and then start to have doubts about others' judgement and try to distance from the decision. That's even worse than the hard decision itself.
It's sort of this. Although it would've been nice if the size of the IP wasn't restricted, so one day we can add an optional segment on top and connect the whole Milky Way, or something.
are you critizising my comment?
First, make assumes a C compiler is already installed.
Example on Debian: do apt-get install build-essential

Second: usually docker, npm, etc are not needed. If the code use 3rd party C libraries, you need to install it. On Debian, again you can use `apt` to make life easier.
The links you posted explain why Linux couldn’t be ported.

If you need Linux on a developer board then you’re better off with a Raspberry Pi (or one of its many equivalents).

Also, it’s pretty bad form to ask people requests like these. You’re asking them to give up weeks of their free time for nothing.
> who's running it.

Juspay is an Indian payment aggregator. They are quite big and are used by high profile brands: https://juspay.in/
I have written a JVM in Rust
Show HN: Boost Your Online Protection
Learn how to create and manage strong passwords for your online accounts and protect them from hackers and phishing

https://mojoauth.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-password-security-boost-your-online-protection/
Then why not assembly is the ideal program language? Ad absurdum, that’s the simplest, isn’t it? Each line does something completely trivial.

Abstraction is the only tool we have to even hope to manage complexity. Unfortunately there is no way to force good abstractions, finding out the perfect abstraction is the deal of the art. Maybe I’m wrong on this, but I’m on the elitist view that the industry really shouldn’t try to replace a single senior developer with 10 juniors that monkey patch based on stackoverflow/chatgpt. I don’t even see how that makes financial sense, if one values product quality.
> I really don't understand this American attitude

Just movie is coming... Remember 2012 ? Same. Money.
A couple facts about Arduino to make sure the discussion doesn't take weird directions:

- In the last years, the Arduino team has been releasing MORE open source stuff than it had been doing in the past. This is documented transparently in the yearly open source reports:
https://blog.arduino.cc/2022/01/13/the-2021-arduino-open-sou...
https://blog.arduino.cc/2023/01/20/the-2022-arduino-open-sou...
Even recently, the flagship Arduino product (UNO) was renewed and with no surprise it's still completely open source.

- In parallel, a vertical line of industrial products (managed by a subsidiary called "Arduino Pro") was added that for documented reasons has all the requirements of open source hardware (including full schematics and fully open source software stack) except for the CAD files which are available on request. This level of openness is the same as a Raspberry Pi, if not higher because all components are available on the market. The existence of this additional product line does not imply at all that Arduino reduced its commitment to open source because, as said above, such commitment is even higher than in the past.

Based on these facts, in no way it is reasonable to state that "Arduino is going closed source" or that its business is "opaque". All opinions are legit, but if they don't take facts into account it's just misinformation or marketing...
Related

I used to be the program manager owner of the security event log in windows.

When things happen simultaneously or very closely in time on multi-core systems, thread scheduling can significantly affect observations of those things. For example, your thread quantum might expire before you get to the syscall to get a time stamp, or before you can pass a buffer to queue your event for subsequent time stamping.

In fact, on multiprocessing systems, it was very common to see out of order event log entries on Windows back in the day (2000-oughts). You also could not count on the log timestamp accuracy too precisely; 1s was pretty much the safe lower bound (some components truncated or rounded time stamps IIRC).
I actually disagree with this. Science requires a substantial amount of creativity. In fact, they are necessary. The nature of breakthroughs requisite thinking outside the box and breaking from convention.

What I would say are real limits to creativity are the arbitrary and absurd evaluation metrics we use. Publish or perish paradigm encourages quick work rather than good work, which correlates with a decrease of novelty and substance. Makes the process more incremental. It also encourages railroading as exploration requires more time.

The review process also exacerbates these problems, as the system is not actually aligned with the goals. They are arbitrary noisy filters rather than quality filters, and we have substantial evidence that, putting it nicely, reviewers are good at identifying bad works but not good at identifying good works (i.e. default to reject). This causes one to continually rework a project rather than moving on or even making it better, as the feedback generally isn't about how to make the work better and each set of reviewers wants to add more and more.

The pursuit of novelty is also not only fundamentally anti-scientific but the basis of an existential crisis. To get funding or to pass review, we must be creative in convincing reviewers that we are clever while ideas generally far more obvious after they are revealed to you (regardless of lack of prior works). The need to innovate also prevents replication, which is the basis of science! It is far more difficult, often nearly impossible, to get funding or even approval to replicate works. Science is the process of ruling things out, not confirming things. Each replication has its own set of noise and biases, and this stochastic nature helps reveal hidden confounders. It is also quite essential to the learning process and failing to perform this task results in information being passed like a game of telephone.

But by nature, science is anti-authority and highly creative. You _must_ challenge pre-existing notions (trust but verify) and you must think outside the box. Though I do not blame anyone for missing this given the structures and incentives (shackles) the bureaucratic system has imposed upon us.
Yes I think it's great, but still it would be good to have research to understand the effect on local population.

It is intellectually dishonest to just say it is not possible for anything to leak and have adverse effects on people without actively researching the matter.
In my field, we invoke the name of Oppenheimer (the Born-Oppenheimer approximation[0,1]) in many of our formulations, every paper we write or talk we give. He did this work when he was a 23 year old grad student. He seems to have led a complex life. Either ways, I don't see the point of this article. While building on the shoulder of giants, he managed to lead the Manhattan project to fruition under the most existential of deadlines. We could even argue that this opening of Pandora's box has had the most consequential direct impact on modern society.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born–Oppenheimer_approximation
[1] https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k15386r/f475.item - page 457
> threads are assigned to cores when they are started

Do they? I thought the normal behaviour was for cores to pick any available thread to run, so core migration is quite normal.

> ergo the time component should also have the thread and the core number combined with it with multi core systems.

Sorry, how exactly does it follow from the previous? You seem to have omitted the other half of your syllogism. After all, clockworks do not have thread nor core numbers so I don't quite see how having those in UUIDs will make computers run like clockwork.
They’ve been working on Fly for years now and seems like they haven’t been able to turn it into a reliable service or profitable business (making assumptions about the second part here), and the overall general sentiment seems to be to avoid it for anything but the most toy applications. I note that the team was also unable to get their recruiting business off the ground either and shuttered it.

My assumption based on the creator’s very online hacker news commentary is that they seem to be at least smart in tech. So what’s the lesson here for the rest of us who may want to start a business? Is this a “shots on goal” thing and we’re just seeing these failures more publicly than most so it biases the perception, or is there some je ne sais quoi missing that we could learn from? No offense intended by my post, but I would be very keen to learn whether there’s some X Factor missing from an otherwise ostensibly smart team’s repeated failure that we could learn from.
Hugging Face CEO Advocates Open-Source AI
I mean worst that could happen is that it's harmful to someone standing right next to it if it fails catastrophically (no clue if that's even a realistic concern in this case). But since this happens over 50 meters below ground I'm not too worried.

Not that it was put that far below ground for safety reasons, it was mostly to save on the amount of land required and to shield the detectors from pesky background radiation (not the other way around).
You need it to make database indices perform better.

If you don't need that, but just need a random UUID, UUIDv4 is better.
Efficiency. They get much more processing power per kw/h of energy than everybode else
US saw that is works with CPTPP so they are getting further.
Sure but is it impossible that something would leak when injecting massive amounts of energy in a gigantic tunnel?
Interesting, most credit cards with rewards I have seen in Aus have substantially higher interest rates which is where I assume they capture the cost of rewards back. Is that not the case in the US?

As for fairness, I agree they should go away. Companies with margin can swallow the fee, companies without could be unprofitable and make no sense if they don't pass on the fee. It's a practical reality of the dollars and cents, but it is a private apparatus we opt into so I guess we can't complain that much.
You should really do some more extensive research about the possible harmful effects of your comments more carefully before posting.

This one is giving me a headache.
I think it's experiencing a hug of death. What is it?
Also take a look at the Python modules that Simon Willison has made available for interfacing with local LLMs. They make it much easier and effective.
Those things could be related to any change in society. There's nothing to suggest it's plastics in particular, right?
I have a dumb home. No smart thermostat. No smart doorbell. No cameras festooning the outside of my house. No smart TV. No smart home owner.

Long ago, I saw a movie as a kid in the 1970s called Demon Seed, where this big computer gained consciousness and extended it's presence to a smart home (well, smart home with tech from the 1970s). It scared the heck out of me, even though seeing it now it's pretty tame...regardless of the whole impregnating a woman with it's child.
The US military and NASA enjoy a fairly flexible revolving door for technology and talent.

For example, see the Hubble vs the two prior spy satellites having the exact same tech.
Douglas Adams was right: Telephone sanitizers are terrible human beings
I was there when there was a (much bigger) quench during commissioning of the LHC [0][1]. It was also at the focusing quadrupole modules - maybe the same ones?

I could make a joke about how it's Fermilab's vengeance for not having their own accelerator, but that would be dishonest: these focusing modules are the most complex ones of the whole ring.

[0]http://stephatcern.blogspot.com/2008/12/photos-of-lhc-damage...
[1]https://home.cern/news/press-release/cern/cern-releases-anal...
You only love your collider

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1e1eLe1ihT0
> Hope they get some magic sauce to become better at this.

When I saw them describe their multiregion SQL replication architecture I thought "what crazy person thought this wouldn't eventually open up a spider's nest of distributed systems errors?"
I agree with the sibling comment.

> just like a really good book was much harder for the author than it was for you, the reader.

Now, I suppose this could work for a nested narrative novel, where the reader is meant not to just read the book, but to rewrite and expand it as they're reading it. Adding new ideas, new sub stories on the way. Think 100 Years of Solitude blended with Italo Calvino's Invisible Cities.

Seems like the [*]Bible is a good literary example of an async collaboration similar to code: notoriously hard to interpret, and full of dubious historical information and contradictions.

I know that Christians call it the "good book", but most of them don't use the word "good" in the same way they'd use it to describe a Nabokov or Eco novel.

[*] or most ancient religious texts, like Avesta
It also means once your hash function leaks for whatever reason or gets brute forced because of whatever weird weakness in your system, it's game over and everybody will forever be able to predict any future ids, guess neighboring ids, etc., unless you're willing to change the hash and invalidate all links to any content on your site.

If I'm in a scenario where I think I need consecutive ids internally and random ones externally, I'll just have two fields in my tables.
I see a lot of opportunity here to fight racism
I take it you haven’t been exposed to Important People(TM).
It's bad reporting. The actual numbers from the abstract are "22.1 ng/kg·day" for the worst case ingested dose, and "1000 μg/mL" for the tested toxic concentration. If you assume the solvent is water (solvent isn't specified in the abstract but water is the obvious choice) and convert the units to make it easier to compare, that toxic dose is "1,000,000,000ng/kg". There's no plausible way a toddler is going to accumulate that much within "days".
I like those offers, they self-identify as places to avoid
I assume gluing a self-inflating balloon to the drones to prevent sinking would be sufficient.
Yep. That's why in the movie, Bohr (if I'm not mistaken) saw Oppenheimer going to teach quantum physics in US to be... funny.
Ask HN: How to Become Smarter?
Slowly Does It (2000)
> If the capacity to be bitter has survived millions of years of natural selection, perhaps it serves a function

Deterrence being one obvious function.
Please consider generating some sort of automated transcript from these.

I'd hope your target audience would understand the limitations of such a thing, and I'm probably not the only person who'd rather read than listen even with the obvious caveats.

(these days automated transcripts seem to be no harder to mentally fix up the errors in as I read them than "somebody typing fast on a software keyboard and suffering the inevitable tyop and autocorrupt related issues" is, though of course others' mileage may vary)
"text-based variant of the Linux kernel that doesn't require a MMU can be built"

Seems to be possible.
I have had good experiences with them for the past ±10 years.
I just don't believe that unless you have specific quotes you can point to that indicates this.
Despite the resolution being nanoseconds, what is the actual precision of computer clocks? I can't imagine it is actually nanoseconds. Takes me back to teaching physics labs where I had to hound students to remember that the accuracy of their measuring device is not identical to the smallest number it displays...
You never know, it might have been one of those time-travelling tachyons coming back to prevent its own creation (an actual conspiracy theory during the initial problems at LHC).

For anyone genuinely concerned about LHC, we've detected cosmic rays hitting our atmosphere at orders of magnitude more energy than what LHC is doing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My-God_particle
Man, so relieved it's just cooling one section that is meant by "major consequences", title made me think of the explosion during commissioning. Looks like it's only sector S78 that needs attention: https://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/vistar/vistars.php?usr=LHC2

This report is impressively detailed for being put out just two days of the incident, but I guess LHC having world class technical diagnostics teams is not too surprising.
I work at Northvolt, founded in 2015 in Sweden it is now the main EV battery manufacturer in Europe. A lot of the core positions (most of the battery chemistry researchers, some engineering/management/operational roles) in the earlier days were hired from South Korea, Japan and China. The company now hires a lot of Master's and PhD students from Europe itself (either after graduation or do their thesis in partnership with the company), as well as most of the engineering/operational/management.

That is how you do knowledge transfer.
A lot of people forget that the reason there even was an uprising was because the country was so poor and the upper class was seen as decadent and out of touch.
I think they went with the headline for clickbait purposes. Gum arabic is used in a bunch of things, rolling paper glue being my first thought.
The was a small leak of helium within the instrument. Such incidents are completely unexceptional with superconducting magnets, and pose no risk to anyone outside the room where it happen, since both helium and nitrogen are about as inert as gases can get. I suspect it wouldn’t even have made the news if it hadn’t delayed the experiments.
But they didn't even explain what FUIF or PIK might be in that section or even the entire article!

To understand that article required me searching for FUIF [1], PIK [2] and a brief explanation of what JPEG XL is trying to achieve.

I double down on my "complaint" - I'd call it constructive criticism - that article was poorly written. It's actually quite a good story that their Free Universal Image Format (FUIF) has achieved what it has. That's a great acronym, especially for a world that thinks JPEG XL is a good acronym! Why not put in in the article.

To save anyone else time:

[1] https://github.com/cloudinary/fuif
[2] https://github.com/google/pik
Truly stable countries don’t have attempted coups at all, then, if you really insist on being pedantic.
Videos: The NYPD Violence That Cost You $13M – Hell Gate
I couldn’t believe the narrative of WW2 I “learned” when I visited the War Museum in New Orleans. It’s really quite remarkable how countries can simultaneously tell the truth while having widely differing narratives.
we've been looking at at a lot of custom models for https://faraday.dev (shameless plug)

There's already some interesting fine tuned llama2 models:

- https://huggingface.co/NousResearch/Redmond-Puffin-13B
- https://huggingface.co/Tap-M/Luna-AI-Llama2-Uncensored
A major problem in synchronization of the system clock is PCIe. Hardware can timestamp PPS signal or PTP/NTP packets with accuracy of a few nanoseconds if everything is well compensated, but the PCIe bus between the CPU and the timestamping HW has a latency of hundreds of nanoseconds with potentially large asymmetry, degrading the accuracy significantly.

Measuring that error is difficult. A possibility is to run a program periodically making random reads from memory (avoiding the CPU cache) to generate a PPS signal on the memory bus, which can be observed with a scope. There is a lot of noise due to other memory activity, RAM refresh, etc. From the configured memory speed and tRCD+tCL timings the uncertainty of the error can be reduced.

This might improve with new hardware. There is a feature called Precision Time Measurement (PTM), which is a hardware implementation of an NTP-like protocol in PCIe, but so far I have seen this working only on some onboard NICs.
So the dish washer is out? There is those sterilization things where you add a little water and put the bottles in steam for a few minutes. No idea what the risks there might be, but this is what my sister did, and I think it was plastic bottles at first, though she switched to glass with her second child because of micro plastic concerns etc.