skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Part of this is sharing of effort. Given a vague request, you can demand clarity or you can go try to work it to your best ability. Guess the most likely closet and go check it. If not there, go check the next one. Etc.

This approach is harder on you… but easier on her. And that is a sort of gift that one can choose to give to a spouse. Allow them to be quick and vague sometimes, and choose to invest effort to pick up some of the slack they drop.

Not all the time, but some of the time.
the specific PR-Agent repo:
https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent

"Making pull requests less painful with an AI agent"

includes various AI-empowered functions: /review /describe /improve /ask /reflect
On the other hand there was Juicero...
Take a step back from what, exactly? What they stated was factual and generally complete.

The event in question was not someone telling a cop to F off. There are plenty of chargeable variations within the gamut of your polar examples.
So what is the appropriate term then for "source code freely available, but cannot be used for commercial use?"

I guess probably an unpopular opinion here, but I don't see why "open source" must imply that anyone should be allowed to fork the repo and sell it.
Will banks be able to charge fees to their customers for using FedNow like wire transfers?
they admit you off of the waitlist if your family donates a lot but i think they get to not count it in this years numbers or next years if they give you a deferred acceptance
Or a poster!
The government can already see all your ACH transactions like payroll, rent, etc because the Fed Reserve literally runs ACH. This also isn't replacing credit cards or the like, so it is basically an ACH replacement.

That's on top of reporting requirements banks already have for your transactions.
I don't understand this comment the Tsar and the Nazi's were both governments.

Another good example is the Dutch housing all the data in an building that was used to track down and kill the right people.

The data existing is the problem. The ideal situation is that there is no data.
I believe the basis of hate crime laws is that the act of committing the crime is low-grade terrorism. When you attack someone because of their membership in a particular (protected) group, you're also sending a message to everyone else in the group that they could be next.
I mean, they’re just emulating the zeitgeist. This is what happens when the prevailing worldview is inconsistent and hypocritical.

We’ve normalized the idea that words and subtle actions can be micro-aggressive and thus are violent. That’s literally the logic these days and instead of fighting it most people happily jumped onboard entertaining idiotic rhetoric in the name of social justice. So I’m not surprised at all to see this stuff try to make it’s way into laws.

Your responsibility as a citizen is to maintain a fair and just playing field. You don't get to cancel others for their word-violence and then turn around and complain when your peers try to put a stop yours. Time to grow up.
Utah is definitely not the most conservative state.

Wyoming
69.9%
West Virginia
68.6%
Oklahoma
65.4%
North Dakota
65.1%
Idaho
63.8%
Arkansas
62.4%
Kentucky
62.1%
Alabama
62%
South Dakota
61.8%
Tennessee

It's not in the top 10
> so do we think Chrome will reverse their decision to drop support?

The argument was that there's no industry support (apparently this means: beyond words in an issue tracker), let's see how acceptance is with Safari supporting it.

An uptick in JXL use sounds like a good-enough reason to re-add JXL support, this time not behind an experimental flag. Maybe Firefox even decides to provide it without a flag and in their regular user build.
For some reason I was expecting it to be more interesting than just being all-in on AWS services. Its fine and a reasonable approach but kind of a yawn in my opinion.
Can I ask how old you are?

I pose this question sincerely, as I'm over 40 and still prefer 2-space tabs myself.
NASA enters ‘home stretch’ to reach golden asteroid
The project seems to come from the crypto-bubble. Bitcoin and DAO are mentioned here and there. So the smell either comes from them being a bit naive and having a poor socializing matching with HN.. or it's a new style of crypto-scam.
> The UK keeps trying to throw their weight around only to find out they aren’t that big.

Their (former) empire is a part of their cultural identity. It's going to take a few more generations to shed the expectations of what was.

The days of two washed-up subjects of the crown taking Kafiristan all on their lonesome are dead and gone.
Another fun fact is when controlling for race and gender you are still more likely to be killed by a cop than almost anything else.
The cat will be visible via the photons it emits in accordance with the blackbody radiation curve. The cat will look like a body glowing in the infrared spectrum.
> It's not that the past is not true. The past is true, what was reported is not.

How do you know the past even exists? All you have is memory and reports, which are unreliable. You can only make the assumption that "the past is true."

> We know very clearly where the problem lies. The media is a lie.

You're understating that. It's not just "the media" boogeyman, it's memory and records that are the problem. They're never complete and always get stuff wrong.
>attacks upon his honour and reputation

Yikes, seems like this is built to keep people from saying things about powerful people that they don't like.
We already use social security numbers for everything (insurance, credit, etc.). It's pretty much a national ID, just a shitty one.
So what you're really complaining about is that other people will not follow your choices. If your relations have such a hard line that a single app is "the only way to interact with certain groups of people", they are the ones to blame, not the maker of the app.
Remember when pharma companies rolled out a vaccine in record time with nearly zero safety or efficacy studies and claimed it was both safe and effective and got lots of media and researchers to parrot the same. And then when asked for data they said it shouldn’t be made public for something like 50 years? And then we learned it wasn’t nearly as safe as claimed and a lot of the impossible to spread from the injection site claimed were untrue at scale and whatever measure of effectiveness used didn’t include immunity or transmission. History is littered with junk science claims by entities with financial incentives. Unfortunately, there are probably also incentives to identify risk in competitors products.

Unfortunately, “science” has done a good job of discrediting itself lately and shown to be susceptible to corruption, influence, and outright fabrication. How can anyone trust a paper discrediting another any more than the original research when the liability associated with those harmful effects would be astronomically damaging to influential organizations?

I don’t have any issues with most traditional, dead virus vaccines, but also have no trust in pharma or even public institutions to do what’s in the public’s best interest when it is not aligned with theirs or causes other harm to them.

We need more pharma sceptics, imho. They hold a considerable amount of power over the population and take in absurd profits in the process. Anyone who challenges that will be misrepresented and maligned publicly, if not removed through more violent means. I’m sure Kennedy’s know that more than most dynasty families.
I had a house that had really bad termite damage and the contractor called it "structural stucco".
Is your counterpoint the below? Is it claiming that Target's practices don't or shouldn't work?

"All individuals should know to use /r/shoplifting and are therefore impervious to Target's case-building trap."
If you're only incrementing when you change a particular call, then you end up with /api/myservice/create/v2 (or sometimes this is done via header) but v5 for the update call, and understanding what version goes to what becomes a cognitive overhead.

(and really the problem isn't basic CRUD endpoints, it's the ones with complex logic and structure where what's being built isn't necessarily the same thing over time.)

It's one thing when v2 and v5 are the latest, but if someone else comes through later and wants to bolt on a feature to a service that is trying to talk to v2/v5 when v3/v9 are the latest, you have to go back and look up a map of which endpoints are contemporary if you want to add a third call (v2/v5/v2) that is supposed to work together.

This can be done via swagger/etc but you are essentially just rebuilding that service versioning with an opaque "api publish date" built over the top.
They could theoretically, but it is unlikely due to each transaction costing a few cents and the monthly FedNow fee being $25 (it is a utility run on a cost recovery basis). No banks charge for Zelle payments to my knowledge, for example.

This eventually replaces checks, money orders, Zelle, Venmo, ACH, and probably credit card payment volume over time (as seen with UPI in India and PIX in Brazil). Every deposit account can send to other deposit accounts instantly.
The image where she found the duplications in the microscopy image demonstrates an absolutely unreal pattern recognition ability. I knew of her, but I hadn’t previously seen this essay
When it comes to huge government bureaucracies, Hanlon's Razor is double plus plus applicable. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor )
I wasn't objecting to anything. I was just confused because I initially thought it was a Gemnini client web app.
I have a mobile phone SIM which only provides customer support over WhatsApp.
Pretty sure I saw someone do this in the recent Lisp Game Jam, too.
They work for TechCrunch writing articles. This was an article on scams on fiverr. Actual lost money: 0 as fiverr refunded everything
> "Every time Software to fix a [Electrical/Mechanical] problem, a Gremlin is born".

I think I get the gist, but that sentence is missing some words.
The thing about such scams is that they require input. Somewhere along the chain, a human user with a wallet has to send personal or financial info.
> and whether or not it has been reproduced.

Nothing would ever get done if this was the bar for citation. Real advancements take place on the back of fraudulent results in widely cited papers. Actually, even within papers that have fraudulent results, advancements happen.

The motivation for such fraud is because work generally wont get published without positive results, even if the work was excellent. The fraud doesn't take the place of hard/great work. I'm not defending the practice.
Specific class of people can be isolated. No need to put the population in de facto house arrest.
This may be an Ateji, using Chinese characters phonetically to represent loan words: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateji
It is too convenient wisdom to be real wisdom.
S1 is the best
While technically true, it's also a complete BS. It's in the same vain as Torrent websites are not hosting copyrighted content - technically true but complete BS.
> > Had she followed that advice in the 60s, she points out, her students would have spent their time studying JCL

> That’s kind of irrelevant.

To be fair, I graduated from a small college in 2001 and I still had a course on JCL. Local industry used it and my program was basically a factory for graduating programmers who could help fix Y2K issues.
nothing about singling out people for various reasons and depriving them of basic services? read history much?
Great if nare the two shall meet, but what happens when alignment is dependant on spacing (eg. fancy code comments)?
> If you really believe that, I recommend going outside and stepping off 25 feet and then trying some smartphone recordings.

I recommend you trying that in a high stress situation involving an number of people in close proximity and lots of environmental noise. And then trying to see how that footage would be interpreted by a hostile lawyer in court

> I wouldn't be surprised if cops find it very uncomfortable to have bystanders that close when any kind of violent encounter is in progress

These are not violent encounters, the only violence that is going on is from the police. While I do care about the comfort of the police while arresting people, I am more concerned about not being assaulted or killed.
> but it's just a coincidence that it aligns with what we want.

I agree with your comment, but I think it is naïve to assume that Apple does PR by happenstance. Effective marketing/messaging is the bedrock of their business strategy.

So yes they probably did this primarily for raw profit/power reasons, but the positive PR is a close secondary.
> I think 10-25 feet is reasonable. I think 10 feet is more reasonable than 25.

Sometimes I wonder how far people think 10 feet really is. That's like standing across a small bedroom from someone. If you're that close to a cop arresting someone, you're basically participating. 25 feet is more reasonable, but if things go pear shaped you're still close enough to get injured before you even realize something is wrong.
I don’t see how these statements contradict each other. We can both hold police accountable for their actions and also show them respect. Letting them get away with abusing the population isn’t showing them respect.
25' is fine if ALL officers involved have body cameras. Getting that footage should be as simple FOIL request. There needs to be a streamlined process for citizens to obtain footage as easy as it is to browse on Nextdoor.

The problem is when you have a police line established that is 25' from the action and then have to move back another 25'.
>Apple didn't give two stones about security until it became a marketing/selling point

I don't much care. Companies don't have ethics, they have fiscal goals. If Apples fiscal goals happen to line up with my own goals, so much the better.

I would tend to trust a company who is doing something to selfishly support the bottom line way easier than I would trust a company who claims to be doing it for the common good of all humanity.

Google famously started off trying to not be evil and also be a profitable company simultaneously. It didn't work out great in that one of those goals became slightly more important than the other.
The atom bomb is an extreme device, the issue is the extremeness is multi-polar.

Atom bombs have extreme explosions, but they also require extreme maintenance, extreme precision in manufacturing, and are extremely detectable.

For AI the level of extremeness has not been defined. Yea, it requires extreme manufacturing, but it's the same manufacturing that builds billions of chips per year that are distributed almost everywhere. A server farm running AI looks much the same as a server farm running other computing tasks.

Coming back to atom bombs, yes, atom bombs could destroy the world 10 minutes from now, and every 10 minutes from now until we destroy enough of them they can no longer do that. It simply has not happened yet and we've likely been very very lucky that it has not happened.

Lastly, AI, especially when we reach AGI, is intelligence which means it will likely have some hand in if the world is destroyed or not. This risk rapidly increases if AGI capabilities are far beyond human capabilities.
> They're wannabe military tough-guys with laughably worse training and culture,

A lot of them are ex-military which is why every incident is treated like a mini-fallujah. There should be better psychological evaluation of police. It's harder to get a gun as a citizen anywhere in the US than it is to become a cop.The very least we can do is treat them to a far higher standard than we do citizens given that they have a monopoly on violence and qualified immunity. But that would run contrary to their purpose. Cops aren't there to protect you and me. They are the HR of the local, state, and national Government. They're there to protect the interests of the state.
Someone at VoidLinux added this. Curious how many other distros package this.

xbps-query -Rs retro
[-] cool-retro-term-1.1.1_1 Good looking terminal emulator which mimics the old cathode display
[snip...]
Show HN: Using LLMs to control robots
Control a robot using natural language prompts & LLMs. Just a small demo. It already works with a toy robot & I'm currently trying to get it to work w/ my Roomba.
My teenager came up to me and asked me why Biden was allowing drilling in Alaska
Not just Google, Cloudflare is working hard on it too.
I like JXL better than Jpeg XL - if it is brought to the masses I can imagine "jexel" to replace "jaypeg"
> Signing into your personal accounts on a work machine is a terrible idea, as it opens up your personal accounts to search if there is a lawsuit

The machine is mine and I do work on it. Thanks for the concern but I’m not worried about getting sued. I’m sure it’s happened here previously, but it’s not like the US.

> Also outside of programmers, IT, and designers, you rarely get a choice in the company issued laptop. It never makes sense for a company to issue more expensive Apple computers instead of ThinkPads or Dell computers.

I’m not one of those professionals and I can get my job done quicker on a Mac. My employer doesn’t dictate how I get things done and paid for the machine I want. I think this is a good thing.

Any job that requires a crappy trackpad isn't a job worth having.
"...verify me"
that wasn't easy, what I just did.
You Can’t Gamify Security Awareness
Well then why is showing so many mistakes? It makes the experience worse.
The problem with trying to replace JPEG is that for most people it's "good enough". We already had "JPEG 2000", which would have been a step up in terms of performance, but it never saw any real adoption. Meanwhile, "JPEG XL" is at best an incremental improvement over "JPEG 2000" from the user's POV, which raises the question why people would care about this if they didn't about the previous one.
It makes me question why we allow government to be in charge of our money, and the price of money (interest rate meddling by govt contractor federalreserve). I suppose we grow up with it and don't question it.
They are already compromised. They give data to the US government, China, and Russia.

OP is repeating marketing.
“Your voice is your password” kind of systems are still around.
Why agile is not enough to build great products
Elsewhere in the thread people are saying that loanwords got kanji arbitrarily assigned before katakana was in wide use, and it was it this phase of language development that the Japanese and Portuguese first interacted.

I don't know the etymology and don't have a Japanese input method handy, but "coffee" is another word occasionally written with kanji to be fancy.
your response tells me everything though, you think one thing is "rightly viewed as an unacceptable position", neither nuance or complexity is allowed, my original paragraph spoke on tradeoffs, on nuance itself. if you don't address that then you yourself are dogwhistling, how are you better than the strawman you paint of RFK?

regarding the anti-semetic bit, not only did you completely avoid the main point of what was being said by both RFK and me, which is the potential for ethnic targeting, you've quoted his statement yourself with "there is an argument...", its not "i support the idea that...". its like people can't even speak hypotheticals without baseless accusations coming around every corner, what's the point of dialogue if we act like this? let's just settle presidential elections in a wrestling ring.
How can a cat exist in a perfect vacuum? A perfect vaccum has no particles at all and a cat is made of many particles.

My question was more hyperbole to express the deeper question about matter.
I'm not sure if Googlebot respects robots.txt.
See what the internet looked like ten years ago today
He did the right thing by seeking her out to apologize.

The rest doesn’t hold water.

“There’s a small chance that the chaos and ruin I’ve visited upon others may not be as bad as as those people made me think. Thanks, I knew my negligence/malice wasn’t that big a deal.”

The worst people that I’ve ever met would love for that to be true.

They’ll stab people in the back or work to damage people’s careers and when you call them out on it it’s always something like “We’ll if I could damage their career anyone could have.” or “It’s been ten years, why don’t they just get over it?”

Basically: “Yes, I stabbed them. But they didn’t/couldn’t stop me, so it’s their fault that they’re dead, really.”

Negative equity is a real and it compounds over time.

Most people who have been told that they’ve caused actual harm, probably did. Telling yourself that the facts of your story don’t matter or that the people you hurt may even be better off for it won’t mend the people you’ve broken.

Just apologize (for real) and attempt to make amends.
Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness(2016)[pdf]
Too many hours have been lost battering make and searching for lib-$THING in apt, just going from the names of the missing .h files.
I still don't get what advantage QML has over something like Svelte. Writing the QML backend with Rust would be nicer, but why wouldn't I just write my front end using Svelte/TypeScript with something like Tauri at that point? With statically typed languages you get autocomplete, more instant feedback, more editor integration for things like renaming functions variables, and the end result won't have type errors at runtime.

Felgo is what I was hoping for, good find! That covers one pain point, but there's still many, many more. QML does have a simple and great list of components to get started with, where as HTML and CSS have accumulated many years of cruft. But, that being said, aligning elements into rows and columns is easy using CSS flexbox[1]. Flexbox has the benefit of being much more versatile than QMLs layout tools as well. I imagine using flexbox you could make the Kanban UI just as easily, and you'll probably run into less limitations.

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/CSS/CSS_layou...
They could also add support for RCS if they didn't feel like punishing their non-iMessage iPhone users by falling back to SMS.
That analogy does open you up to the natural comparison of overuse of antibiotics leading to resistant superbugs doesn't it though.

Hopefully our bugs aren't evolving though.
A gun isn't going to protect you from police violence, it's just going to give them a reason to become even more militarized and an excuse after they shoot you
India’s system is more usable, though, apparently. This seems like an improvement but it doesn’t do the same thing?

> Because UPI is designed to be intermediated by computers rather than by humans, transactional information gets captured by the payments company while the transaction is in progress, and that can tell the clerk (or cron job) that the payment succeeded without them needing access to the bank account.

> This is a fun engineering challenge in many countries, which are often overlaying bank transfers as a payment method on top of bank transfers as a settlement method.

[…]

> Bank transfers are an extremely small percentage of customer-to-business payments in the U.S. In addition to the speed issue, which might get improved by FedNow when it launches (wags have referred to it as FedLater), bank payments have no consistent way to receive metadata, and despite being no-cost they compete with well-developed credit card ecosystems which credibly offer better-than-free pricing through rewards schemes (to the customer, who generally gets to choose which payment method they use to transact).

https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/bank-transfers-as-a-p...