skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think there is real option of buying worthless fakes online for overinflated price of real one...
try doodling a cat and prompting 'bird' or vice versa and you see what I mean.
It is absolutely a popularity contest. The biggest problem is that many academics are reluctant to deviate too far from current consensus in fear of damaging their reputation.

The result is that research in many fields tends to stagnate and reinforce old ideas, regardless of whether they are right or wrong.
It feels in part that people like to have opinions, but also lack real information or insight to have a deep conversation about something - hence just breaking it down into basic blobs.

That said for topics I do have some more in-depth understanding (and opinions on), I've started to find discussions around them to be... draining. People seem to want to argue or 'discuss' things heatedly, but that's it. It never leads anywhere or to any meaningful change in behaviours. Not that I'm trying to influence anyone, but it just feels like arguing for the sake of arguing. I'd rather just keep to myself at that point.
Interesting. I'm seeing something slower. Pagespeed shows 2.7 seconds:

https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-themer-dev-blog-the...
that's really interesting. is there any public document or manual describing their workstations and policies? like the SRE manual
So because billionares will try to fight legislation to keep them from trying to make things more equal, instead we should have them just voluntarily give their money to universities, as if that somehow isn't even more susceptible to being spent the way they want rather than to make things more equal? I admit I'm biased in favor of using taxes instead of university donations to redistribute wealth, but even for a position I disagree with, this seems like a fairly weak argument.
and you can also click on a request in the network tab and find out the line of code triggered it, including callstack

also with react dev tools you can click somewhere on the page and see the react component, it's props, etc. similar tools are available for other frameworks
But the guardrails disallow everyone else from engaging in voluntary transactions with no third party harm. That's the real issue. Reduce everyone's freedoms to save a few from themselves.
To be clear, I'm not sure your analogy makes sense for the bambu printers vs prusa situatuon. If anything, prusa did not spend enough money actually advancing their tech. They are still deeply attached to their good old bed slinger design in 2023, and they literally just implemented the same thing with minor tweaks for years until recently. They rested on their laurels which was fine when the 3d printing industry was stagnating, but not anymore.

Bambu lab on the other hand came up with something pretty good, very well integrated that has basically taken 0 from the prusa designs. So it's not really closed source profiting off of public or open source work. Maybe for the slicer, but that's it.

Just compare the abysmal performance and quality of prusa's MMU that still really sucks almost half a decade after they originally released the product. Even if they are super expensive too! While on the bambu printers... It just works.
I used also an official app of a public transport provider and I pay via paypal. The ticket is immediately active.

'IBAN' is a bank account number. So you had to have a bank account - most people have one. The 'ticket' is actually a subscription.

There are now 11 million owners of a subscription of a Deutschlandticket. Start was 1st May 2023.
Handball (Also called Wallball) is popular in New York City, along with a few other places in the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_handball

You can also view tournaments that have been held here:
https://www.youtube.com/@TensFinest/videos

It's one my my favorite hobbies; I've been playing since I was a teen (not that I'm any good at it lol). Outside of Florida and California I don't think many have heard of it. Though I believe there are a few places in Europe that play (Belgium I think?) but don't quote me.

Happy to elaborate further if anyone is curious!
> it's game over for FOSS in Europe

You mean the European Union. The rest of the world will be fine.
It is something that distinguishes them, certainly. As someone who switched from using Vue to React at my day job, dev tooling & editor support have been the things that stand out the most to me. React works well with Vite, which has helped make it easier to use, and I've been migrating projects away from Webpack + Jest to Vite + Vitest, which saves a lot of dependency maintenance. I definitely miss Vue 3's VS Code extension when I work in React, though.
>> MIT and Harvard are almost completely different. The promise of MIT, as I understand it, is sort of a ruthless no-compromise academic excellence. The promise of Harvard or Yale is that you are going to be inducted into the American ruling class. These are different goals.

> For students, sure, but when being hired (or funded) they all have similar “elite” tier intelligence/potential, nothing about ruling class

Being suited to "ruthless no-compromise academic excellence" may actually tend to make one unsuited to a whole host of "ruling class" jobs, so maybe they're not so similar after all.

IMHO, people who are personally focused on intelligence (especially when they're "intelligent" themselves) tend to overestimate its value in a lot of endeavors. Even in academic sphere, I understand a lot of extremely successful scientists are intelligent but not that intelligent. Their success comes from their attitude, personality, and other factors.
My use case has always been:

1. take some input

2. run it through the llm to get some output

3. make that output useful to my non-english-speaking software by structuring it.

Forcing step three to happen in step 2 means you're in a very unusual/unrealistic "head space"/context for next word completion.

Leaving structuring as a later step means the human like output/reasoning can be maintained for step 2, with the inhuman like structuring being more of a reformatting than reasoning+reformatting.

Leaving the "context" as small and precise as possible (which might me large for a given task) gets the best output, from what I've seen. Being a next word predictor, this makes sense to me.

I suppose this is just "chain of thought".

This is pretty easy to benchmark. Have it put the answer into json format, after producing the answer. Then, have it come up with an answer in json format, as one step. It's a night and day difference, at least for my tasks.
New Zealand apparently does. Never been there, seems lovely

(edit: this opening graf is too good not to share)

"Animal welfare protestors at a hunting contest in rural New Zealand have faced off against a group of child attendees, some clutching dead feral cats, who repeatedly chanted the word “meat” at demonstrators."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/28/chaos-at-new-z...
I used to work for a small company that sold a device for $400 which had a Bill of Materials cost of about $20. Nearest competitor sold theirs for around $900 and looked slick. Ours was housed in (I kid you not) a Radio Shack blue plastic box.

One day I got a call from a plant foreman needing a replacement and asking the price so he could get Procurement to order it. His reaction was "that little box is $400??!! Whatever, can you Overnight two of them, we're down right now."

Value and price are two very different things!
Baseball's roots are steeped in shepherds leisure.
https://3seaseurope.com/oina-baseball-romania/
> You say 400 years, but the United States didn't exist 400 years ago.

As a historical fact, West Germany and East Germany both paid reparations to Holocaust survivors, despite neither being legally identical to the German Reich.

If for various reasons you find that unconvincing, it’s also the case that the Funding Act of 1790 has the federal government assume the debts of the colonies.
Enlighten me. Which G20 nation has better economic conditions than the United States?

According to this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average...

The PPP adjusted median income is highest in the US (not counting Iceland/Luxembourg for obvious reasons).

And as a follow up, how stable is the government in your example countries? The US has the worlds oldest document-based government. The rest of the “western countries” have constantly collapsing systems/borders with the exception of France who has historically done exceptionally well in this regard.

TL;DR - Why should we take notes on wealth redistribution from other societies which are less successful?
I find it funny how minimalism is considered a virtue in a band setting. All those New Orleans bands can manage perfectly with everyone just blasting whatever into the air..... :)
> That an overworked public school teacher is going to write a better letter of recommendation than a private school teacher?

LOL. My understanding is the really good prep school college counsellors golf with one or more high-up folks in elite university admissions offices, and get the inside scoop on exactly what they and their peers in other universities are looking for in any given year, such that they can even tune an essay or letter of reference for a given school based on that non-public information and advise students which schools to focus their application efforts on, based on their background & activities.
Pta – the plain text accounting program
I was just reading an article from a HN story yesterday, where it was found that around 1/4 of data published in studies in anesthesiology were found to be faked. You know, anesthesiology, the field where giving you the wrong drug or the wrong amount can kill you.

I strongly suspect that a driving factor is guys like this - leaders who reward "positive" results and punish "negative" ones.
Sure is. Good thing criminals are too dumb to find it, and especially too dumb to replicate it. I'm sure they will never be able to modify their skimmers to circumvent it. They will rue the day they messed with Target's IP lawyers!!! https://patents.google.com/patent/US11507762B2/
Only for large retailers, though. Why not directly offer the CAD file for download right on that page, or make the resulting product available for purchase?
You're welcome.

The main page for Ferrocene says "ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 qualified" with "DO-178C, ISO 21434, and IEC 62278 in the future," so depending on exactly which things you need, Ferrocene may work, but it also may not.
Don't expect to be motivated everyday
A fairly simple one I've seen is "when will this be done?" - stakeholder means to ask when will it be in production; engineer hears "done" as in "my task is done" and answers about when the PR will land.
I suppose the proper spelling should be "WhatsApp is Dawnn".
Really? I’ve had no problems with the (usually CH34x) USB interfaces across high double digits of boards. I could ICSP them (and do for some of the 3D printers), but I can’t recall a single instance of Chinese-made clones needing that.

There’s no way it would get me to pay 5-8x over the clones/respins.
> As long as this stays in the browser, and is not also used server-side, I don't think there's much to worry about.

I'm kind of breaking the immersion here, but I'm quite sure at some point Netscape was selling a Javascript powered web server.
I think your idea of speeding up the DOM is the right one, but the view transitions API has almost nothing to do with it. That’s more for whole page changes, and doesn’t solve the main issues which is that the DOM simply does way too much and is bloated to all hell, and that JS is single threaded.

I’d like to see a new mode introduced ala “use strict”. I know the big brains at the top hate this but we need a way to shake off some legacy especially in the DOM. A few changes to its semantics could dramatically speed it up. And then the second part would be a way to share events and DOM across workers so we can put React essentially off the main thread. These two changes together would make websites able to feel like native apps.
Well that's not really true in any sense. Almost any jazz piano player today worth their salt will favor two-handed voicings for comping, and comp with left hand while soloing.
>In the process of its verbiage manufacturing it may also slightly twist what I said, which may be different meaning, or is factually incorrect etc...

Exactly what a human would do.
I thought WhatsApp users went to Telegram after the Facebook buy out?
> I don't have a polite way to stop that one yet.

Selective doses of being impolite can be extremely effective, especially when you're otherwise very polite.
Would you show the example? I didn't invest a lot of time with Bard, just did my usual tests, and when found that it can't properly solve the traveling salesman problem (unlike GPT-3,GPT-4), I have rejected it as a possible tool.
Growing every second, our dataset is a unique, ever-expanding collection of accurately labeled images for object detection.
License AGPL3.

Will not integrate with internal services.

https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/blob/main/LICENSE
> You can be far more productive by running your tests natively inside in your IDE, or launching a server directly in the IDE with hot code swap.

What makes these things faster in an IDE? I.e., these things don't seem slow to begin with (usually up arrow in a terminal and hit enter). I can see iterating through and fixing errors/test failures, but there are tons of ways of handling that that don't require an IDE.
The Forbes article at the occasion of IBM's apology (2020) has more.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeremyalicandri/2020/11/18/ibm-...

And got a few comments at the time:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25146271
Impressive? This is the default. You have to actively do stuff to make it slower.
It's an extremely valuable observational skill. It's also an extremely valuable skill to be able to get everyone in alignment, but much much harder to "git gud" at (so to speak).

A few suggestions for getting more value out of your observations:

* in the moment, particularly if it's heated, you won't make a ton of headway unless you really know the parties involved and know how to frame "i think you agree with each other" well enough to be heard over the argumentative mindset. Instead pointing it out to each party individually in a later/follow up discussion can help a lot!

* If you have a good "people person" mentor or manager, just pointing it out to them can often result in positive outcomes, because they can take it on themselves to have the discussions in the background or if you ask for it, mentor you in how to get that across in a well-received way.

* sometimes when people are arguing with each other in agreement, the issue is usually semantics and someone (or everyone) has a different take on some word/phrase/name whatever being used. A good tactic is to try and identify where that bit of disagreement is and play dumb (it works best when you're in a "junior" position but can work in any situation) and say something like - "wait, sorry to interrupt but I don't quite get the difference between foobar and barfoo can you help me understand?" and then when they explain to you, the neutral third party, they'll come to the realization that they are arguing in agreement after all.

I've been in your shoes before and the above advice helped me get going so I'm passing it along. For me the difficulty in relaying the info came from a couple places:

* I was afraid of speaking out of turn, or looking dumb. It turns out that the "dumb look" i was afraid of is often interpreted as "wow this guy is asking smart questions", and at worst it's interpreted as "this guy needed a bit of a different explanation to grok it".

* I didn't realize that people don't need to understand that I was seeing them argue in agreement or avoid the question. I just needed to ask my own clarifying questions until everyone got the info/agreement they needed. If they get that I was driving at "arguing in agreement" or if they think I resolved a conflict, it doesn't matter - the goal of "we're all on the same page" was successfully reached.

I've still got a lot to learn in this whole area, but even trying to address those things often helps smooth out the rough bits and is useful. HTH!
There is only one important factor: the frameworks others wrote, and the ones you wrote yourself.
Tesla starts production of Dojo supercomputer to train driverless cars
First off, if you download content from an inofficial source you are not exercising your right to make private copies. See my previous response in this thread.

What you ask for is right at the start of the document in the second link.

Verket görs tillgängligt för allmänheten i följande fall:

1. När verket överförs till allmänheten. Detta sker när verket
på trådbunden eller trådlös väg görs tillgängligt för
allmänheten från en annan plats än den där allmänheten kan ta
del av verket. Överföring till allmänheten innefattar
överföring som sker på ett sådant sätt att enskilda kan få
tillgång till verket från en plats och vid en tidpunkt som de
själva väljer.

...

Framställning av exemplar för privat bruk

12 § Var och en får för privat bruk framställa ett eller några
få exemplar av offentliggjorda verk. Såvitt gäller litterära
verk i skriftlig form får exemplarframställningen dock endast
avse begränsade delar av verk eller sådana verk av begränsat
omfång. Exemplaren får inte användas för andra ändamål än
privat bruk.

In legal debates this point has been clarified over and over. Swedish law does not concern itself with the technical difference between broadcasting video content on TV (or airing music on radio) and making the same content available over the Internet in streamed or downloadable form. When the rights holder makes the piece accessible to the public, through whatever distribution channel, you are permitted to copy it from the same channel for private use.
DOM changes are only a part of the story. Another part is a component model that allows to build complex software from tiny and sometimes messy individual pieces.
Why it was created and on how it compares to https://www.ledger-cli.org/, see https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article;sid=20200928123430
That’s a brilliant idea, if someone else hasn’t already implemented it
Nice article. I grew up when it wasn't really possible to be into computers and not have a visceral sense of this. Presumably nowadays it would be possible to get very far into programming (maybe into a career in it!) without practically encountering storage-as-bunch-of-bits, although surely people know that's what's there.
Haha, the anti angular bias in this is so strong. From getting things just wrong to presenting their own feelings as fact. Makes me discredit the rest.
Look at the list of people appointed to run executive agencies, serve as judges, etc., and see the degree to which our society is run by elites from a handful of schools. The Supreme Court that issued this decision has one Justice who didn’t go to either Harvard or Yale.
Admissions are easy to do right. Just give anyone with a valid educational background (like college/high school completed) a chance to participate in a strictly observed live exam, which is then graded anonymously. 100% fair, leaves no place for discrimination. This is how many countries do it in Europe and it just works.

But what about economically disadvantaged minority groups? That's easy to fix too. Just give schools in poorer areas lots of extra funding and resources, and their skills should improve, so that they do well in exams without any ridiculous "positive discrimination" based on skin color or ethnicity. As a bonus you also help poor people who may not belong to a disadvantaged ethnic minority, but still suffer from same lack of opportunities.

Of course all this requires money, which the 1% isn't willing to give. But from anyone else's perspective it's plain stupid that the system first fails to give people of poorer background proper education, and then tries to fix this by discriminating based on ethnicity, which only partially correlates with poverty and bad schooling.
At one time it was taboo to copy hobby kits verbatim without adding anything significant to the design.

China IP address show up within weeks of starting any new small open project, and 2 months later one often sees project cloned alpha PCBs available on Ali-express/ebay/Amazon/tindie/sparkfun. The defective legacy RAMPs 1.4 with potential fire risks are still being sold a decade later.

It has become such an issue, that even finding the original authors to support their projects becomes increasingly difficult as google starts to overflow with pages of SEO ad links.

I wouldn't say anything has changed, but open hardware doesn't seem sustainable unless you are an active small factory in China.

Good luck =)
I don't see it that way. The main need for change detection in my opinion is to remove the need to update parts of the DOM in an imperative manner. It is fine to do that for smaller projects but when a project gets large, it becomes difficult to reason about the myriad of changes happening without a system to handle that. I find any one of the examples in the linked post way more easy to reason about than manual DOM updates.
As well you should.
It sounds like a person that could spend their money like that because of the right music and lighting effects should probably get help before going to a casino.

Also, just as likely this person is already abusing their body with drugs.

This planet is HARD and not every thing born on it is going to have a good time. Ask the squirrels my neighbors shoot at if life is fair.
TIL WhatsApp has an on-premise product...
The default download link installs malware/adware alongside FileZilla. If you go to the actual downloads page, you get the vanilla version.
Why couldn't this just be binary systems colliding and what they are seeing is the process of combination? Perhaps, inside they are still revolving around each other, albeit slowly, with opposing masses that have struck an equilibrium creating what they see from their readings?
Most users don't even know that happened.
Instruction fine tuning definitely increases the win rate in human judged comparisons but that just means it's better at generating a style humans like. Humans aren't always right.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.02155.pdf Page 56/68 in table 14 it looks like the things the fine tunes beat the base models at are basically HellaSwag and the ones that use human evaluations. Otherwise base gpt models are winning.

And just before that they're discussing how the fine-tunes do cause performance regressions on page 55.
So it doesn't try to interpret the doodle. But as said elsewhere the output shape will try to match it.
Besides GNU/Linux I compiled on MacOS. I made no effort to test on BSD systems or Windows. I included only few std libs so I wonder - what exactly makes it not compatible with OpenBSD?
Im pretty sure everybody gets energized once they've gotten fully comfortable with someone.

That process of getting comfortable is the relevant context though - not a virtual dial in their brain that goes from "introvert" to "extrovert".
The University of Kansas is an AAU school and has an acceptance rate of 92%. Most R1s are big state schools who admit almost everyone who applies. You do not need to go to an Ivy League schools to get top notch research instruction.
Additionally:

* Once the bottom falls out, bag-holders get burned, but the collective nightmare is over.
My experience:

JSX is the best templating language.

Svelte hides complexity and this can bite you in tracking down issues.

React just feels better to me for a professional project, though I like Svelte.
The popularity of the sentiment seems to depend crucially on who precisely the father is, and what the sins were.
That existed: MDL.

Well, MDL has < > conses and ( ) conses. These have a different type tag, but are otherwise identical. MDL uses that to give the two different semantics, situationally.