skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What's also good to see here is that the post '90 numbers usually don't even fall within the error bars of the pre '90 numbers. While uncertainty is great, it isn't the end all. I think a lot of people forget how difficult evaluation actually is. Usually we just look at one or two metrics and judge based on that, but such an evaluation is incredibly naive. Metrics and measures are only guides, they do not provide certainty nor targets.
30 seconds on aliexpress found me this:
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mPSrPR0

No Bluetooth, but it does have a dedicated RF remote.

Edit: figured out the keywords I needed for the exact product you want “bluetooth immobilizer”

https://a.aliexpress.com/_mNgigFk
> You are shifting the goalposts by trying to say it's about scale and reach,

Not at all, unless the meaning of "massive" has changed since I last looked the word up in a dictionary.

I said "no such massive campaign existed". Yes, campaigns did exist, but not with the "massive" size google was able to bring to their campaign.
Samsung's 4 nm process node achieves yield rates of 75 percent
System76 publishing PCB diagrams for new laptop on GitHub
Bitcoin and crypto brace for further upside as equities extend their gains
It took me less than a minute to confirm that Billings Montana did, in fact, used to have an electric trolley system 100+ years ago.[0] Just like nearly every other US city at one time.

[0] https://billingsgazette.com/streetcars/image_1048a3b1-20c3-5...
I immensely respect Ukraine but a US-China war would involve the best technology this planet has to offer and the Chinese have been preparing for it since the 1970s.
Also, the assumption that math is universal so sharing vocabulary in math is helpful for bootstrapping language understanding is a fascinating assumption to question. Even if you can explain Pi and prove that you can mutually understand trigonometry that might give you some small portion of engineering insight, but it can't yield most of the rest of engineering such as design or aesthetics (or emotions) or any number of other things that make for useful project communication.

It's something I've often thought about in the way that the Voyager record was built and Sagan's Cosmos novel assumes it and many others. Even recently, the novel Project Hail Mary borrowed that assumption that math is enough shared language to bootstrap understanding. I think the movie Arrival did some of the best work of showing why that wouldn't necessarily work, but also had the language in question designed by a mathematician and still fell into some parts of the assumption/trope. I'm not saying any of these examples are bad for doing this, I certainly love them all. It's still a small something worth criticizing.

It's certainly not a bad thing to want to communicate math, and to hope that things like Pi are "constant enough" to provide bootstraps to other communications, but it's also such a fascinating thing how much science fiction thinking (and real world scientific thinking such as the Voyage Record) think that you can just sort of "yada yada yada" your way from "so we established communications of basic mathematical constants and concepts" directly as a straight line of some sort to "now we can communicate all sorts of other things".
MuscleWiki Advanced Bodymap select a muscle get exercises
We just launched our advanced body map, filmed exercises for it, drew the graphics. Just hit the "advanced" button
Legalizing Marijuana Is a Big Mistake
Larry hates Wikipedia because Jimbo Wales got all the credit.
Population Clock
Most of the old phone people I'm aware of lived long, healthy, productive lives, often living many decades beyond retirement. Those who did not, in my own personal experience, dont really have a single cause of death.
I agree with you. But I also personally don't really care if they translate the movie title or rename it.
Ironically zero is the only number unlike any other number.
Anyone interested in the official data regarding Zika/dengue/etc, they're published by the gov - eg https://www.vs.saude.ms.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Bo... (once a month)
When I was younger here in the Netherlands a lot of us had tweaked motorcycles/scooters that would go much faster than the allowed cap of 50km/h.

Many had a "cop switch". Cops suspecting you messed with the engine would put the scooter on a test belt to measure its maximum speed. The cop switch would instantly cap it to the allowed speed. Mine was hidden in the left mirror, a minor adjustment would activate it.
I’m at 200+ applications for a non-tech job.
Starting with my ZBook 15 from 2014:

1. Make it 16:10. There is plenty of bezel for that. 1900x1200 or something like that. 1200p was pretty common on good CRT monitors in the 90s.

2. Make the number pad optional. Framework is doing that with their 16" model. I'll bury my number pad and give a party.

3. Keep the three physical buttons on the touchpad. By the way, it can probably do gestures and it definitely register clicks but I use it only to move the pointer and scroll with two fingers. I bought the physical buttons because I want to click with them. The middle one pastes the text selected with the left one (Linux.)

4. Keep it user serviceable. I replaced RAM, disks, keyboards, battery a few months ago, it aged well.

5. Maybe make it 2 kg.

6. Maybe trim some bezel on the sides and make it less wide.

7. Definitely make it work with a much slimmer power unit.

8. It's got USB 3 and 2 ports, DisplayPort, VGA, SD card. Probably add an USB C but I don't know. HDMI? I've got a converter for that.

9. Current year CPU and RAM.

10. Discrete graphic card? Don't know, probably not worth it. I have to watch videos and move my desktop, that's all.
You can deactivate anyone's WhatsApp account by simply sending an email
converting an area is hard, but a street is easy. we don't need to pedestrianize whole city centers, just pick the streets where it makes sense. cars don't need every street. people are perfectly willing to walk a block if that's their only option. if you close a street to cars, people will park on the next street over and walk.

the street parking in front of a business is never enough for all the patrons of that business anyways, people are usually parking and then walking 1-2 blocks to get where they're going. removing the street parking in front of a business only removes the hope of finding that perfect parking space.
> 2560/1600 = 1.6 (this is a good aspect ratio, the perfect laptop has a ratio ≤ 1.6)

Not just laptops, but monitors in general should be 16:10 or taller. 16:9 only became popular thanks to the computer display industry naively adopting the aspect ratio of televisions. But 16:9 comes from the film industry and has nothing to do with computer productivity. It's a shame that so many monitor manufacturers still focus almost exclusively on 16:9 (or even wider, when width is easily achieved by multiple monitors, side-by-side). I'm fine with the wide options existing, but give me some taller options, too, please.
CFD is actually really hard to get right.

F1 teams for example constantly struggle getting their simulations to line up with their measurements.
Ah! Sorry. I misunderstood the scope of your initial 'I disagree.'
I remember having eaten this, not many but several times, in places called "Konditorei". Like a coffee shop, but with additional bakery/pastries. Was really good actually, but there were many other options which were at least as good. "Schwarzwälder Kirsch" f.i.

So by no one I assume you mean the "fortgeschrittene Fertigfutterfresser" who prefer other convenient stuff, and/or have no Konditorei near them?
How about this one: tune your hyper-parameters based on the results on your test data.

This is prolific, even the norm, but it is a form of information leakage. You're passing information about the test dataset to the model. The solution to this is to use 3 partitions: train, validation, test. Validation is for HP tuning (you can do cross-validation btw) and test is a single shot.
> historical, topics different books have different areas of focus and interpret events differently

In those areas the fact isn't the base fact, but claims of fact. We don't know who explored which bit of the great pyramid in which order, and may never, but we know of many specific claims.

The fact check wouldn't be "The great pyramid X" but "Herodotus said X about the great pyramid".

> in general, they're not the place to hash out the "right" interpretation of events.

Once you scope the problem correctly it's not a problem. The point isn't to solve historical riddles, it's to document what evidence we have.

Sometimes that evidence is broadly accepted measurements (land area of Australia) and other times it's not.
Exactly. You absolutely need maximum configurability for the most important tools in your arsenal. You can pass with defaults on less used tools but everyday stuff should be as efficient as possible. In my case those tools are editor, shell, browser, OS, media player - they are customized extensivelly.
I’m not spending time to tailor my resume to get ghosted.
In fact, I have increasingly seen the pattern of adults who work from home but have a commute to drive their children in the morning / afternoon. That's 2-ways both times, for the record. It's often multi-destination.
> but many people prefer the exact opposite

> people leaving abortion-restricting states to less restrictive ones

It's incorrect to claim that people leaving abortion-restricting states to less restrictive ones have the opposite preference to me. My preference, and I'd guess their preference in most cases, is to not allow any state to outlaw abortion. The idea that a woman leaving her own state to get an abortion has the preference of allowing states to decide to outlaw abortion sounds pretty absurd to me.

Furthermore, polls show that the majority of Americans support abortion rights, nationwide. "A record-high 69% say abortion should generally be legal in the first three months of pregnancy." "A 61% majority of Americans think overturning Roe v. Wade, thus ending constitutional protection for abortion rights and returning the matter to the states, was a “bad thing" https://news.gallup.com/poll/506759/broader-support-abortion...

Here's a funny thing (funny as in hypocritical, not funny as in amusing): I've seen too many instances where advocates of "local control" suddenly impose restrictions on local control when they happen to achieve broader power and are able to implement their policy goals. It was never really about local control, it was about winning by any means available.
ha ha. You clearly don't have the slightest clue what you are talking about.
Code Europe 2023: Legal outlook on cybersecurity [video]
I'm using Brave at the moment. I'm still seeking a better browser. I'd love to lose the Chrome UI style, if nothing else.

> I've never had any performance complaints with Firefox

Lots of people don't. But lots of people do. My assumption is that Mozilla targeted their improvements at a particular sort of machine and if yours isn't close enough to that, then your performance is very poor.

For me, the turning point came last year (or the year before, I forget), when an update was released that caused FF to take between 3-5 minutes to start up. Nothing I did resolved this. That was the moment when I realized I just had to give up, that FF is unlikely to become a reasonable choice for me in the future. (Although prior to that, FF performance for me had been on a continual downslope ever since Quantum -- which itself didn't improve speed for me, but didn't harm it, either).
> But the key point that you are missing is that this is the same for every single time you play the entire game. It doesn't matter where the car is in step (1), or which door you choose in step (2), or which door the host opens is step (3) - if you always switch doors, no matter what, every single game you double your odds.

The key point that you are missing is that it doesn't need to be "the same for every single time you play the entire game" to have a well-defined solution for the particular realization of the game described in the problem statement.

And the solution for the problem where (1),(2),(3),(4) happen with the host picking a door at random is 50/50. That's what cman1444 said.

You're asked a question conditional on (1),(2),(3),(4) happening and the things that didn't happen are irrelevant.

Just like if you're asked if you want to switch the envelopes when you got $1 you will say "yes" and it's completely irrelevant that you could have got $10 and you would have said "no" in that case - because you didn't.

In conclusion, some people find the problem where (1),(2),(3),(4) have happened and the host was picking a door at random (and its 50/50 solution) interesting and you don't. De gustibus non est disputandum.
Do you work at/have worked at a trading firm? Frontrunning is indeed illegal and several firms get fined for it.

I was at a top trading shop and we and other places take compliance pretty seriously nowadays. Otherwise (if you aren't a prop firm) you'll lose clients, get fined, lose reputation, etc.

Also fyi being the very fastest has diminishing returns. You are at the whim of the exchange's matching engine processing order, which may be nondeterministic.

There are places nowadays that derive their edge from fast hw/sw, but increasingly, the most successful places are ones with the smarter strategies, higher volume, and more products traded.
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Especially with something that I would think is only used infrequently.
This is just your poorly informed opinion, IMO. Many people think it is the exact opposite.
I dont use browser password saving, but I just looked and FF syncs passwords.
I think that his statement highlights a misunderstanding of the capabilities of ML in the near future. It's an honest mistake since all the startups chasing pumps in investment are selling the idea of terrifying power.

A more apt parallel, in my opinion, is that of solar geoengineering. We are doing what Oppenheimer wish we did: ignore its existence. However, the allure, now as it was then, is that it's too little effort for too much power to ignore. It isn't an existential imperative to the global North so it has been dismissed. Make no mistake if climate change posed a direct and immediate existential risk to nations of the global North we would have stopped global warming already. Instead we are waiting for the collision of "nations that can afford solar geoengineering" and "global warming posing a direct and immediate existential risk" in 2-5 decades and doing none of the legwork to avoid unintended consequences because the notion of doing the science is not popular politically.
According to the article, the shortcomings of the M1 Macs is they can’t run any operating system, so there you go.
Surprisingly it has been smooth. Power modes work as you would expect even across OSes. I always run the graphics mode in hybrid mode to I’m using the integrated chip 90% of the time until something really needs the 3050. In Gnome, you can explicitly launch an application using the dGPU or you can set the environment variables on the application shortcut to always use the dGPU.
I had one of these as a child.

They were awesome.

I still think there is a place for basic-with-linenumbers for teaching beginners.

One of the most awesome things about it was that when you switched it on it just powered up and was a computer. It dropped you straight into a prompt.
Should i run `docker run helloworld` or use katacontainer VM to output Hello world ?
We're talking about the UK though - and I don't think the US has given us the license to sell our F35s to anyone else (not that they're any different from the USMC's F35B) - so if you're at the point where you need to defend from invaded land, we really have 'already lost'.
> Part of the problem is you can’t just convert an area to a pedestrian area as people still need to be able to get there. You need to construct low cost parking garages around the area so people can still get there.

From what I've seen pedestrian area conversion typically includes perimeter parking.

A interesting case similar to conversion to exclude cars, is the conversion of very old places to have cars. Guanajuato, MX was built up in the 1500's. For the majority of the old town residences and businesses alike are inaccessible by car. The city did convert some major roads, creeks and mines to roads, but parking for many is relatively distant.

[Edit, update from state to city of Gto]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guanajuato_(city)

https://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g150799-i726-k1701090-...
> (except for on Ubuntu where you're forced to use the Snap).

FWIW, "forced" isn't the correct term here. One can still download the .tar.gz and unpack it at will (or, I presume if determined enough, repackage it into a deb using fpm/nfpm). Just watch out for `chown 0:0` otherwise the 1Password extension tries to be cute and accuses you of malware and refuses to work citing a fantastically opaque error message

source: a random person on the Internet who loathes snap and whose hate for snap overcame his activation cost for downloading the standalone binary. I just have to remember to use Help > About a lot because their update notification is braindead (and that very point is on-topic for this thread: execution matters)
The wikipedia politburo already makes it impossible for normies to edit any wikipedia article worth editing. If you don't believe me, try it out with a stopwatch to see how long it takes for your edit to be reverted.
"slashes" prices to only $10,000 more than when it was introduced...gee
I'm appreciative for the person who wrote the article.

These are my favorite types of debates and while I disagree with it for much better articulated reasons already mentioned, primarily the exploitative nature of header files used as security through obscurity, I think it stirs up a lot of debate and keeps the spaghetti meatball of knowledge around patterns/anti-patterns, "best-practices", etc. moving forward in a much more passionate way.

I think this is the truest sense of the term "hacker" which lives up to the title of the site pushing us into these debates. Putting stuff together that doesn't always work as intended or expected but arguing for and against it.

A long winded thank you to everyone, OP and all the threads responding.
How old? My S10e isn't very new and FF works great.
Sounds exactly what I thought when I first heard of Wikipedia. What, anyone can edit? Pure anarchy! Surely it would get taken over by trolls immediately!
> Ford's leaders seem to be way out of touch with working class folks

To be honest, I think you're the one who is out of touch. The vast majority of pickup trucks sold in the United States are luxury vehicles bought for the purpose of conspicuous consumption, and haul goods only incidentally. Ford knows this and markets/prices the F-150 accordingly.
There is none for nukes as it involves the zero sum game of war. Because you'll die if you don't. Russia and Japan were already developing nukes independent of the US, as the theory for nuclear
fission was well known. Logic says to fire immediately if you opponent can't, as eventually you'll lose advantage, a scenario that scared the Soviets to whits end, despite the US not doing so. So you either make your defense or be at the whim of your opponent. Being moral and dead isn't a very good outcome is it?

Overall, the history of nukes lends credence to the idea of keeping doors open, to naively and hopefully trying to avoid zero sum games. The US decided against Kyoto to keep Japan postwar. It's willing to go fire the nukes in defense of Japan today. The US didn't annihilate the Soviets post WW2, despite offense. Khrushchev talked an idiot out of nuclear war and a Soviet operator said the sensors were wrong. But it's only something a single side can control, and it's not assured that you won't end up with a cruel or zealous antagonist, who at best will pause to thoughts of their own death, or you need to make pay to have any hope afterwards.
FFS... you're getting confused by koube's botched formatting and making the same formatting mistake at the same time! He put the claims that don't pass his sniff test on the same line as his skeptical remarks about those claims, without any formatting to differentiate the two.

> "- Lancets are winning the war. Who is winning the war is debatable but usually I hear that artillery is the decisive weapon of this war. Additionally Ukraine is winning on artillery attrition, with some claims of a 3:1 ratio of attrition, so drones are not significant on this, at least not significant enough to overturn the attrition rates."

The first sentence is the claim that doesn't pass his sniff test. The rest of that line is his explanation for why it doesn't pass his sniff test. It should be something like

> - "Lancets are winning the war"

> Who is winning the war is debatable but usually I hear that artillery is the decisive weapon of this war. Additionally Ukraine is winning on artillery attrition, with some claims of a 3:1 ratio of attrition, so drones are not significant on this, at least not significant enough to overturn the attrition rates.

And

> "- Western weapons get less useful by the minute. This one is technically true as all armies adapt to new challenges. However I wonder what the condition of the Crimean bridge is today."

Should be formatted like

> - "Western weapons get less useful by the minute."

> This one is technically true as all armies adapt to new challenges. However I wonder what the condition of the Crimean bridge is today.

But then you made the same mistake right here:

">Western weapons get less useful by the minute. Could you provide ANYTHING to back up such an assertion."

That should be formatted as

> "Western weapons get less useful by the minute"

> Could you provide ANYTHING to back up such an assertion.
Why don't we just make minimum wage $100 an hour?
> People who are motivated by intrinsic rewards? Well, that's a bit trickier, and I'm not sure what tools a manager would have available to them in this situation.

They're not easy, and you don't want a lone wolf on your hands, but you do want to give these types a really long leash so they have the freedom to work on something they do enjoy. Then they'll give it 200%.

These are your rangers, your scouts, your trailblazers; they always seek excitement and there is no taming them for the banality of routine. So harness that by directing them toward experimental/greenfield projects that align with your/company's interests. They're the ones who'll find the new big thing, because they will quit before they allow themselves to get bogged down with yesterday's bullshit work (however critical it may actually be).
Can you make a version that's HTTP over DNS (rather than the more common DNS over HTTP) for use on gated internet that allows DNS but no web traffic?