skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Misgendering Should Be a Crime, According to Millennials
you can do the same in aurelia:

counter.html:

<template>
<div>${count}</div>
<input type="text" value.bind="count" />
<button click.delegate="inc()">add one</button>
<button click.delegate="counter--">subtract one</button>
</template>

counter.js:

export class Counter {
constructor() {
this.counter = 0
}

inc() {
this.counter++
}
}
> There's no such thing as objective moral and ethical good.

I'm curious how your framework handles some particularly unpleasant examples.

E.g., is there nothing universally wrong with what Hitler / Mengele did to Jews? Or how about raping, torturing, and then killing toddlers?

I have trouble accepting an ethics in which there's no real basis for telling such people that what they're doing is genuinely wrong.

(I apologize if these examples seem like straw-men. It's possible I don't understand your original point.)
Prusa's comments here are very important. In this specific case, China is not "stealing intellectual property" in the sense that they are using it without a license; they are literally stealing title to the inventions in question, which is way worse.

Of course, the obvious solution would be to not respect international patent priority from China, but that is tantamount to fighting a trade war, which has significant strategic implications. You can't sue the US to force them to de-normalize trade relations with China for the same reason why you can't sue the US to force the army to nuke China.
It's been a while since I've messed with the details of mail servers, but it would seem that if a server passes the graylist test once, that's a good indication that it will continue to pass it, so you may want to see if you can have the graylist process allow the 2fa mails after the first one makes it through with retries.

Won't help much if they have a large outbound cluster though.
Wow. My first encounter with Kevin Mitnick was a random one.. joining one of my school's IRC channels one day there was there guy on it who was bragging about how he had broken into our central AIX server, would read the admins' e-mail all the time and for every hole they plugged he would just find another one.

I was just a university Freshman just starting my CS classes, and seeing this discussion, it was like I had entered some underground revolutionary meeting. It opened my eyes to mischief and testing the boundaries of systems and order where this guy who was on IRC as root@system was just calmly saying how the technical universe I was just learning about was controllable in ways I had no clue about.

I never followed the case after he was prosecuted, and I didn't go down the hacker route in my career, but it was a life-changing moment for me to see this outsider live out "War Games" in real life.

RIP, root. Your crimes and mischief certainly didn't define you, especially as you went down the ethical hacker path (the first?). Pancreatic cancer is a horrible way to go, I am sorry to see this story today and condolences to his family and friends.
There are no threading implications to async in Rust. The executor you're using may add some requirements on your futures because it wants to run them on multiple threads[1], but that's not related to async itself, and you can always use a single threaded executor if you don't want these limitations (and they doesn't apply to embeded anyway).

[1] namely, your futures will need to be Send + 'static.
And read "Ghost in the Wires":

https://www.amazon.com/Ghost-Wires-Adventures-Worlds-Wanted-...
Corporatized academia is far worse than Hollywood and Wall Street when it come to protecting bad actors. The name of the the game is "don't rock the boat and keep the grant money flowing". Nobody wants to bring focus on another's questionable activities lest their own receive focus.
> > it is recommended not to ... compare values based on different models
> i.e. R0 numbers are worthless. You can't compare these values between pathogens

That conclusion doesn't follow from the predicate. The model isn't a single simulation run. To mathematicians, the model is the entire framework. It's the SIR model, or the SIS model, or the SIER model, or my favorite model of immunity decay against pertussis... _those_ are the models. The virulence of the infection being modeled, resilience of the population, morbidity and mortality rates, rate and timing of population quarantine, vaccine adoption rate, vaccine efficacy, whether any of the aforementioned values are themselves functions of time... those are just parameters into your model. We absolutely compare the values between pathogens _within the same model_ when discussing the utility of the model.

But typically, the utility in reproduction ratio is as a point of comparison as you tune other parameters. This is part of why a comparison of reproduction ratio across models isn't recommended. It's not just that it's hard to draw meaning from the comparison, it's that the base assumptions of the models might be too different for the comparison to hold any meaning. The reproductive ratio between a continuous model with uniform population mixing is fundamentally different from the reproductive ratio approximated from discrete simulation. They may both broadly speak to "if everyone they saw was susceptible, how many people do you expect to get sick per sick person?" But what that ratio means is dictated by the context of the model.

A frequent utility in comparing ratios is to discuss intervention impact. One might write "Our model found that overall reproduction was reduced to a factor of 0.XYZ (comprehensive infectivity parameters a=nnn b=mmm c=ppp) when the population undertook vaccination schedule foo. Conversely, reproduction was reduced to a factor of 0.JKL for the same infection under vaccination schedule bar. See Figure 14 for complete population state levels over time."

That's all that is. It's a number that has some meaning in context, and one that is often removed from that context and unreasonably expected to retain its meaning. Averages don't mean as much if you don't know if your distribution is multimodal. It's the same thing - a summary stat that can give you a glimpse of the whole, but still just a summary stat.
Real people lost significant amounts of money thanks to SBF. I know of no comparable case involving Mitnick.
Novel: Notion-style WYSIWYG editor with AI-powered autocompletion
If you and your wife really love each other and your wife really want to have a piece of the love you had in form of another family member, why not?

Is the submission for someone who just died the right place to write something you already know is harsh? Considering the kind of person Kevin was, I'm sure a bunch of his friends are on here, reading these very comments so maybe just a tiny bit of respect would be suitable.
yeah it feels like we've already hit rock bottom as far as child content on YouTube...i don't want to be proven wrong though.
It's either keep them bone dry or keep them wet, but alternating it is a really bad idea.
tokenization is half the battle. you're still stuck with normalization.
Yeah, this makes sense. Wasn’t super familiar with the target of Mitnick’s hacks but looks like mostly monopolies like Pac Bell and government. SBF was also “hacking” SV investors and politicians, but probably inflicted more collateral damage on the little guy.
Since apparently people enjoy the USCSB Youtube channel, I thought I'd post IMHO their most interesting video: In a twist of fate, multiple errors in the manufacture of the Blowout Preventer cancelled each other out, meaning the Blowout Preventer was partially functional. Critical safety errors cancelling each other out is something I've never seen in any disaster post-mortem.
He wasn't just affiliated, but I understand the frustration with the idea to some extent. Yes, it does sound reasonable because at any point in time they could've sat him down for a course correction and helped him learn. This was pretty much his brand as much as I can tell.
SBF wasn't anything new, just the latest in a long line of scammers and frauds. Mitnick, for all of his faults, inspired a generation of people to poke and prod at technology and opened their eyes to the ways in which it could be used (and abused). Also, I don't think many people consider him "morally good". Definitely a "morally gray" character more than anything.
Hey thanks! And hopefully your green username doesn't make people think we are one of the same as your comment, while greatly appreciated, is not some smart (or stupid) marketing strategy on my part.

I honestly believe we can work smarter and I talk about the paradigm shift here https://devboard.gitsense.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp?board=gits... Note, the repo that is talked about in the intro DevBoard hasn't been pushed yet. DevBoard will be open sourced and I'm currently working on a browser extension (will also be open sourced) that will convert GitHub's insights tab into a hackable dashboard, which should make it easy for people to address GitHub limitations.
IQ is a pretty good proxy for that.

In France, admission to the best higher education institutions, like Ecole Polytechnique, is done through an anonymously-marked written exam with questions about math, physics, etc. Admission is entirely based on how you scored on that exam, with the top N scores guaranteed admission (and the ones below that have to expect some people above to decline for whatever reason, which in the case of Polytechnique is rare, unless they got into something equally prestigious like Ecole Normale Superieure).

This system has produced three Nobel recipients (Becquerel in physics, Tirole and Allais in economics), many famous mathematicians and physicists (Carnot, Cholesky, Chasles, Coriolis, Fresnel, Mandelbrot, Navier, Poisson, Poincare, Thevenin, Lagrange, etc.), three French Presidents (Giscard d'Estaing most recently), many military leaders, astronauts, CEOs, etc. and indeed also Hacker News posterboy Fabrice Bellard (and that's just for one school, Ecole Polytechnique).

It works.
Living a somewhat frugal life is probably key to living a happy life but recycling and personal responsibility is a smokescreen as documented heavily in the history of green PR.

For some reason the american political hegemony the world suffers under has convinced everyone that global culture is driven by the most superficial almost cartoon-like identity or introverted politics and not hardcore resources, class war, and realpolitical games adhering to a global physical reality.

It's a trick. And it's working because people look inwards when they should be seething with rage at the elite and the systems that have put us in this mess. Hint: Someone did something to community organisers from the 60's until now.

There is only trying to go against the bizarrely powerful lobbying groups, the open doors between industry and politics, the shadowy networks of power, or if not interested in parapolitics try to move towards various scientific adaptations for an extremely uncertain future.

The world is a huge cybernetic system and human culture or something as irrelevant as personal consumption patterns is 100% downstream from physical resources, technology, and the resource and class wars plus geopolitical games to control them. These were the known targets for all successful mass movements but that has been obscured.
How about Denmark? Seems like a smooth running country. Hardly any national debt. Free healthcare and education for all. Consistently rated as one of the happiest countries on earth.
Legend.

A name of inspiration, igniting curiosity across ages. And of course, the only crime was curiosity.

RIP
IMO, the biggest fantasy in Star Wars is that everyone wouldn’t have died long before from galaxy spanning plagues - over and over again.
Kevin came to speak at CMU in the University Center. Maybe around 2003/2004. I recall it was standing room only. For me, it was like seeing your favorite action hero in real life. Yes he was convicted of some crimes, but he showed you could be redeemed and continue to live a good, fulfilling life educating others what not to do. RIP
what's the difference between a type and a font?
Thank you. Timely as my team is looking to skill up on advanced python.
This is an excellent point. A lot of crappy research goes on, and nobody pays it any attention (except, occasionally, when cranks outside the field want to prove that "peer-reviewed research proves the Earth is flat).

It's frankly not worth the effort to debunk a shitty piece of researchin a low-profile journal that's never been cited in a decade.
Heat pumps are about 1.3x up front cost, but 0.75x over the life of the unit. New construction therefore tends to prefer a/c, but some federal and state subsidies are kicking in soon to sweeten the deal.

In really cold climates (e.g. Minneapolis, Montreal) heat pumps often also need a supplemental furnace or fireplace because the heat differential inside vs. outside exceeds what the pump can handle. Depending on your fuel source, you still come out ahead, but not as much.

I should note that I'm not an expert by any means; my brother in law works in this field and he gave me a crash course a couple weeks ago. So I probably feel like I know it better than I actually do.

[1]: https://carbonswitch.com/heat-pump-vs-ac/
Who made it their primary goal to harm someone for enjoyment in your story?
> At work I have far less misunderstandings with coworkers [...]

You have fewer* misunderstandings ;)
> The Slot Machine Effect refers to a scenario where the generation of AI-produced content feels more like a random game of chance rather than a deliberate creative process. This is due to the often unpredictable and instantaneous nature of the generation process. Current off-the-shelf generative AI systems do not support or encourage multiple creative evaluation steps in context of a long-term creative goal

I’m really interested to see the new UIs we come up for this. Rather than a sequential conversation, perhaps more like a tree of possible dialogs/scenes.
Even if these services were free, I would still prefer BitTorrent. Why?

- It has a wider selection of content. I don't have to faff around looking for which content is available on which service.

- There is no DRM.

- Do these services even work on Linux? I know BitTorrent does.
It's interesting the article doesn't indicate how they reach the conclusion that it was due to "entitlement". The only thing that seems to actually be indicated is that conservatives would complain more in different contexts. The reason of why seem to be totally left out and completely supposition and based upon the researchers predetermined biases.

It seems they didn't consider the possibility that it was simply a reasonable expectation that when you pay for work that work is completed at an acceptable level. Nor did they consider the vast amount of other studies and research that have shown that service work has declined in quality over the years.

It would be interesting if the research study took the complaints in a double-blind method to the owners or the management of the establishments to evaluate if these complaints were valid and if the service was done in an acceptable level. With that data you could then associate if they are being entitled and expecting more than what is supposed to be delivered or if the service was subpar and the complaint was appropriate.

Nowhere did I see this in this article it was simply if you complain you are entitled regardless of the validity and conservatives are more likely to complain.
Did this cost you money personally, or just inconvenience you?
Study finds regular 'phubbing' could be damaging marriages
It already stands for Executive Director and Early Death. It's possible that the ED of an ED had an ED which led to him suffering from ED and ultimately having an ED.
You can put a hard budget limit so you're not financially ruined if you go over those $10. And there's ultimate $25 all-you-can-eat plan, too.
What are you even implying? That nobody deserves to own a home? Or people with homes are the real problem?

I don't see any reasonable way to interpret this comment
This is cool. I asked ChatGPT4 to explain to me what it does, and it gives a useful overview:

This is a minimal Gemini protocol client written in C. The Gemini protocol is an application-level internet protocol for serving hypertext documents over secure connections.

The code includes various standard C libraries and the OpenSSL library for secure connections. The `WARN` macro definition is used to print warning messages to `stderr` and jump to the `start:` label.

In the `main` function, it defines variables and initializes certain structs, like `struct sockaddr_in addr` that is used for internet socket addresses. It then opens a connection with the Gemini server on port 1965 (the standard port for the Gemini protocol). The connection is encrypted using the OpenSSL library functions. It also opens two file streams, one for history (`.gmi100`) and another for a temporary file. The file names and locations are generated by the `tmpnam()` function.

The main loop reads commands from `stdin`. Depending on the command, it can execute system commands (when the input starts with '!'), navigate through the history (when input starts with a digit), process a variety of single-letter commands (like 'q' for quit, 'r' for refresh, 'c' to print current URI, 'u' for up a level, 'b' for back in history), or interpret the input as a URL or a part of a URL to be navigated to.

For URL navigation, it creates a TCP socket connection with the Gemini server, sets up an SSL connection over that socket, and sends a request to the server for the resource identified by the URL. The client handles the server response depending on the status code. For example, if the status code is '1' it's a request for input and if it's '3' it's a redirect. It prints the response to `stdout` and also stores it in the temporary file.

For `text/*` type responses, it additionally parses any lines that start with '=>' as links and assigns them a number, storing this in the temporary file for later navigation. If the line starts with '=>' but doesn't have a description, it goes back to reading the rest of the description.

After processing the server response, it uses the `less` command to display the content of the temporary file, allowing the user to scroll through it if it's longer than the screen. Before each new iteration of the main loop, it flushes the temporary file and goes back to the `start:` label. If the user quits, the function returns 0 and the program terminates.

Overall, this program is a command-line based Gemini client that allows a user to navigate the geminispace, issue queries, and view text documents served over the Gemini protocol. It also keeps a history of visited URIs in the `.gmi100` file.

source: https://sharegpt.com/c/xscNWg6
> this one of the 300 niche sites im building

Like bragging about throwing the most empty soda cans out of your car as you drive down the highway.
More than 1,300 experts call AI a force for good
So use better more standardized prompts. Specify the exact fields you demand of your unstructured data, refine your pipeline.
> I just can’t see the PRC and the CCP in its current form sticking around long enough.

I took an upper-level course from a China expert in 1989. At the time, a big question was exactly how long China's government could maintain national unity unity in the face of the many contradictory forces pulling at it. Turns out the answer was: longer than a lot of Westerners thought.
Effects are way too easy to use improperly. I used to be a fan of useEffect when it came out because of its concision, but after working with countless devs/agencies, it's clear that most people misuse it. The rules of useEffect are inelegant, and creating readable state machines with useEffect is very hard. You end up with spaghetti code either in your custom hook, or directly in the component. While most components need 2-3 effects rather than 20, useEffect is not a scalable way of managing state IMO.
fwiw, I'm OP. I use it with 32GiB of RAM and a 1TB M.2 and it's been fantastic for day to day development on two HiDPI screens. The Vega-M graphics card mine came with is also on mainline Linux in terms of driver support.
Not from steam directly, but there are a number of websites to sell your CSGO skins for real money on.
It's not clear what exactly you mean by "pre-lisp" here. Lisp existed before && and || syntax, for more than a decade.

There is nothing relevant in this area that is "pre-lisp", really.

The Lisp 1 manual from 1960 already describes this:

"AND is a special from to test if all the propositional expressions following AND in the list are true. The propostions are evaluated in sequence until one is found that is false or until the end of hte list is reached. The value of AND is respectively F or T."

"OR is a special form to test [ ... similar description elided ]"

Found on page 48.

(The modern Common Lisp and returns the value of the last form if it is reached, and the modern or returns the value of the first form that is not nil. This is more useful since you can do

(let ((obj (or (try-getting-object :from-here)
(try-getting-object-another-way)
(make-new-object :with-param 42))))
...)

Given that short-circuiting, multi-argument AND and OR already existed in Lisp in 1960, we don't have to think about defining them in terms of C operators.

The versions which return a useful value are a bit challenging.

// if x is not zero or null, return x; otherwise return y
// ... without evaluating x twice

#define or(x, y) ... good luck!

We need GCC typeof and expression compound statement. Something like:

#define or(x, y) ({ __typeof(x) __tempvar = (x); __tempvar ? __tempvar : (y); })

I just remembered GCC has a specific extension for this. You can omit the middle operand of the ? : ternary (a feature not in ISO C):

#define or(x, y) ((x) ? : (y))

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Conditionals.html
If you have VC money secret or secrets.com might be worth it
Complexity is usually quadratic or factorial. Only a tiny number of systems are logarithmic. 20% reduction in parts can often be a 40-70% reduction in cognitive load.

But the funny thing with fractions is that if go above a threshold and come back from the brink, the path back is a smaller number than the path out. So if you go from 8 to 10 steps that's 25% worse and if you undo that bad decision you are getting 20% better. So you want to be careful to compare sustainable to unsustainable and not the other way around, if you follow me.
It is unclear what you are actually saying. An ensemble of models combines the prediction of multiple models, so I'm not sure how you submit "the best one." But what is standard practice is to do some hyper-parameter search and submit the best one. It is status quo that "the best one" is determined by test performance rather than validation performance (proper, no information leakage). These hyper-parameters do also include the number of dropout layers and the dropout percentage. For "noise layer" I'm also not sure what you mean. Noise injection? I don't actually see this common in practice though it definitely is a useful training technique.

But if in general, you're talking about trying multiple configurations and parameters and submitting the best one, then no that's not dirty and it is standard practice. Realistically, I'm not sure how else you could do this because that's indistinguishable from having a new architecture anyways. People should put variance on values but this can also be computationally expensive and so I definitely understand why it doesn't happen.
Are you willing to say who it is?