skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Where does it get the list of books from? I thought that was always the biggest challenge with sites like Goodreads etc. Goodreads both (A) pulls data from Amazon, and (B) has an army of volunteer "librarians" who have additional privileges to merge duplicate books etc.
If you’ve never seen this you really should to understand how bad this can go.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150402-the-worst-place-...
This is probably something that deserves a thorough answer, but to cite a recent one: any event where a billionaire ends ups suing his own attorneys can probably be marked as a "high-profile failure".
Pardon My French: A Guide to French Colloquialisms
AFAIK the focus right now is on supporting `async` in traits, which required a bunch of language features seemingly unrelated like Generic Associated Types, which were released in rust 1.65, and Type Alias Impl Trait, which is still WIP due to some complications.
I see the ios and android clients are open source, but not the server implementation - I would not call that "open source."

I am sticking with Bitwarden.
The timber trees that were planted were local species. It is the monoculture that is the problem.
Does it? The possibility of doing otherwise seems just as important as the reality of doing it.
That’s like saying the /r/books subreddit exists in some form already as the NYT bestsellers list. This is fundamentally different (and noteworthy), as it’s another entry in the fediverse space.
Except he didn't say it[1], or at least no-one who was there remembers him saying it, and it seems like it's something he added in a later revision of his own memory.

As John von Neumann later said, 'sometimes someone confesses a sin in order to take credit for it'. It's clearly what Oppenheimer wanted.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer#Trinity
It's also an organization widely derided as disseminating misinformation about climate change and COVID-19, its two major hobbyhorses. This is a strongly biased source of research dissemination.
> The IETF has never gotten off its anti-NAT high horse.

You say this like it's a bad thing.

Why should it be necessary to have to deal with all the extraneous infrastructure of STUN/TURN/ICE just for basic connectivity?

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STUN

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_Connectivity_Estab...

You have your stateful firewall that does default-deny, only allowing in packets that are replies to internally-initiated sessions. If you need to do hole punching you have UPnP or PCP (which also allows for authentication of requests):

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Gateway_Device_Protoc...

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Control_Protocol
Tinted windows prevent cyclists, pedestrians and other drivers from seeing drivers clearly. If you can’t see the driver, then you can’t know if the driver can see you. Very important for driveways and intersections.
Well, I think so, but i'm probably biased given it's my company. Empirically we dogfood it successfully as a Teams/Slack replacement (and a WhatsApp/Signal replacement) while building it, and lots of others use it for that use case too: https://element.io/customers.

The biggest problems have been that the 'classic' mobile apps are stale, and are currently being replaced with Element X: https://element.io/blog/element-x-experience-the-future-of-e... - which far surpasses the Teams mobile clients in terms of UX & performance. Also, the E2EE reliability and UX on the old apps was also not great, but that's also fixed (at last) by Element X.
> Some people complain about the bundling, but that can be really convenient for your organization.

If you have <50 employees and you are standing on principle against the completely bundled cable TV vertical that Microsoft is offering, I genuinely question how much you care about the success of your business. We should be able to have a rational, business-oriented review of their value proposition - as of 2023, not 2010 or 2018.

Organizations that have a lot of loose capital and cowboy investors might be more interested in playing in traffic with 20+ vendors and horrible integration stories, but we (aka our <20 employee org) really need to ship solutions to paying customers or we don't have any jobs in 12 months.

I always hear everyone complain about how expensive it is, but I feel like John Travolta meme each time I look at our Azure/Microsoft account. The per-seat & consumption/serverless billing models feel like dust in the wind when you have so few employees. Everyone is doing a lot, so why not put a lot of power under each seat? If you intend to do more with less people, I really feel like Microsoft is the answer. If you are a F100 org, I totally get it. Fuck Microsoft. Use something totally different. Build your own datacenters.
OKRs etc are one approach - everything written, documented, and whatnot. Honestly though I think it's wildly ineffective.

What's a better approach? Every single manager, up to CEO level, trusts implicitly his or her direct reports. CEO trusts and delegates with confidence to their immediate reports. They in turn do likewise. Any missed opportunities or mis-steps are an issue between 2 levels in the org, IMO.

Fundamentally it's a people, comms, co-ordination and aptitude problem, so solve it like one.
Needing that much horsepower for a screen or single application is a sign that anything requiring Windows should be automatically disqualified.
I'm not aware of Singapore's system, I'm mostly thinking China (WePay, etc).
Why? TV was certainly a factor then and now.
I have no idea what you’re talking about. Telegram has been the most polished cross platform chat application since its release. All emoji are available without paying? There is no cryptocurrency involved? The whole application is free, and you can get some small benefits by paying a small amount, that’s the least predatory business model one could hope for.
too late being https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-st... ?
Been using Spago (via Cybertron) and it has been amazing
Multi Cloud for AI Companies
I'll talk to my physician about this soon, let's see!
No. Nothing of the sort. They were forced by law to reveal IP addresses of some key individuals.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProtonMail#Compliance_with_S...

https://proton.me/legal/transparency
It’s got a very ideologically-driven focus, including an anti-capital source license:

https://github.com/bookwyrm-social/bookwyrm/blob/main/LICENS...

I think the focus on federation is to encourage small, decentralized and communally operated sites that play well with the broader fediverse. I can see that working well for a lot of book communities!

Also, spent a bit of time a few weeks ago and it already seemed to have the nicest UX of the open social book services, at least that I could see (would love recs - mostly interested in a personal tracker).
Take a look at the Keychron Q10. It's a single piece but with split layout.

https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q10-alice-layout-...

It is perfect for me because I wanted a split layout but like you said, needed keys to be in the same place.
The fun part is over. At least that is how a rust maintainer described it to me.

When I asked why doing the unfun part (documentation, maintenance, etc.) isn't a condition for allowing people to do the fun part (pushing cool new code), it got no response.
> Our designs and our tailwind-config comes from the same spec.

Is this the design system you created, or is this something others can use (or both)? As someone who's avoided frontend work primarily because I find CSS tedious, having a system over top of it that speaks design language sounds interesting.

Admittedly, looking at Tailwind now, looks like it's worth just trying that to start with.
This is begging the question.

While, yes, there are developmental and cognitive disabilities, both inborn and acquired, that can reduce cognitive function, I have yet to see evidence that among people without any specific diagnosable disability, variations in "intelligence" cannot be explained (at least 80-95%) by, essentially, variations in upbringing.

From my personal observation (so no, not a scientific sample), people raised in a household where education is highly valued, by parents who genuinely care about them and are (able to be) engaged in their development and schooling tend to exhibit more of the traits of intelligence than people who are raised in households where education is derided as something for sissies or liberals, or where the parents have to work too many jobs just to keep food on the table to be able to be engaged in their children's lives.

Now, to be clear, I'm not saying "everyone has exactly the same potential in all areas." There are enough natural physiological and neurological variations to ensure that, for instance, I'm better at foreign languages and programming, while my wife is better at research, art, and people management.

But I know enough about the psychology of motivation and mindset (eg, entity vs growth mindset) to know that the things we believe about ourselves and the world greatly color what we are able to do and become—so if we are able to change our mindset from, for instance, "I'm just bad at math" to "I was never taught math in a way that engaged me; I can get better if I want to", then we can achieve things that previously seemed impossible. That's triply true for getting ourselves out of situations (like crushing poverty) that restrict our mindset and our abilities.
Marxists, maybe. Leninsts no.
> At this point I'm personally convinced that ipv6 is a failed technology.

Meanwhile 45% of Google's worldwide traffic is IPv6, 53% in the US:

* https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
>How would this work?

Probably wealth redistribution and/or affirmative action
You can, actually, using '-buildmode c-shared' and '//export FuncName' comment directive. CGo supports exporting Go functions in shared libraries, and sets up the Go runtime to be used properly with native C types (e.g. int64 will be long long).
> Java was created from the beginning for embedded devices.

Exactly.

The biggest deployment of Java was/is on Java smart cards - billions of devices every year.
EVs, while undeniably more efficient, seem very good at abstracting the costs away from the end user. Pair this with autonomy that reduces friction but has its own associated costs and I'm afraid that the increase in use will eclipse the gains in efficiency, leading to a Jevon's Paradox where the overall consumption increases.
ToolJet Secures Funding from Microsoft to build open-source Retool
I've always felt it was a trade-off. I feel that as an IC it's way easier to change companies than as an EM, so that's why I've never been interested in the EM path.
But he does deserve credit for it. Not solely, but so what?
https://OpenLibrary.org is Internet Archive's initiative to solve this once and for all. Plus it lets you borrow e-books.
I read it earlier this year and thought it was great. Imagine my delight when I found out there was a movie coming out in July!
Here's another way to look at it. The test set is an approximation for how the model will perform against production data, but the actual performance of the model is how it performs for actual end-users. So real _actual_ results are always unknown util after the fact. Given that, if the metrics from training clearly show that more data == better model, and there's no reason to expect that trend to reverse, then the logical thing to do is maximise the data used for training to get the best results for actual production data.

Doing this does complicate decisions for releasing subsequent model updates, as the production model can't be directly compared against new iterations any more. Instead a pre-production model would need to be used, that has not seen the test set. However, if data drift is likely, then re-using the old test set wouldn't be useful anyway.
Without the trailing slash defaults me to the Chinese-language page, /zh. The English page is https://joinbookwyrm.com/
What makes you think he is a "nut job"? And how do you justify making baseless ad-hominem attacks instead of coherent arguments against his proposed policies or positions. Isn't that kind of smear better suited to Reddit? It is certainly against the Guidelines of this site. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
It's really odd seeing comments on HN upvoted like:

US government overthrew Iran democratic government -> "I know the US is so evil!"

US government secretly injecting US citizens with radioactive material -> "My gosh, what's wrong with these people?"

US government lies about reasons for Iraq War -> "One of the great crimes of the century"

Then someone suggests, that just maybe, the lockdowns weren't based on science and that we should be concerned about the government overstepping and the comments are suddenly -> "Wow, did you forget your tinfoil hat?" or "Why don't you believe in science?" or "Think of the children"

It's really weird. The US gets rightfully condemned for wrongdoings, but then suddenly any suggestion that they did it again is met with violent opposition.
That's right. The TV part of their business was sold in 2011, feels like yesterday. There were a few rough years of really substandard products being released under the Philips name before they improved to match the rest of the industry. I'm not sure what they're currently like.
Someone took a leak near the sensor.
Either we work at the same company or this is a recurring theme everywhere.
Yes. This is happening. Ultimately, drugs created this way go through the same checks as any other drug. Most drugs, created this way or otherwise, don't work and are potentially poisonous. That's why the processes here are super-rigorous.
Per the article, it seems that it's Slack that's been making the noise and pushing for this, and EU is just playing ball (perhaps because of the mercantilism you mention).
Bluesky wants to do a federation, sort of like Fediverse/Mastodon but with cryptographically guaranteed identities not tied to your server. So apparently the public blocks thing is required by the way their federated protocol - which is presently vaporware - has to work.

Now, you or I might think that if your idea reaches an absurdity like "blocks are public", then you've hit a reductio ad absurdum and you need to go back and check if your idea is actually good and not terrible. But the Bluesky crew are ex-crypto-bros, so they don't think like that.
A circular reference to baseless conjecture is not a source.
Thank you, I have already downloaded it! So far it looks like you have absolutely managed to hit that yardstick!
https://social.coop

Also this list has some hosting providers that offer Mastodon:

https://delightful.club/delightful-libre-hosters/
I will second "the making of the atomic bomb". Definitely the best book on the topic. The audio book on audible is well done as well.
To learn more about Oppenheimer, I enjoyed the following book: "The Oppenheimer Alternative", by Robert J. Sawyer.
https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/49706374

The first part is a well-researched retelling of the years leading up to the Manhattan project and the building of the bomb, through the eyes of Oppenheimer and others. The rest is a science fiction extension of what could have happened if the group stayed together and are faced with another big challenge. I enjoyed the first part even more, as an entertaining way of learning more about Oppenheimer and the other scientists involved.
Plus the topic category for this piece is “AIER >> Daily Economy >> History >> Authoritarianism”

Lmfao, overreaction much? I suspect Mr. Tucker has never had the misfortune to live in an actually authoritarian society.
I tried to get into it recently and found the cost prohibitively expensive to play casually.

Contrast with Pickleball- for $100 I have a racket and balls and can play on courts, if I pay $300 I can play almost anywhere, and that is the lifetime cost
Nissan to Adopt North American Charging Standard (NACS)
> July 2023 - 44%

What's the worldwide average. For the US specifically it's the majority of traffic at 53%:

* https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
You might still be upset from our previous exchange in another thread about Hanlon's razor, so you found another comment of mine to try and pile on ("Oh no, that's not true, I just decided to participate in this 4-day-old conversation!")

I caught ya. Have a good day!
Been using Ryzen + Nvidia on KDA plasma for the past few months and it works quite good; generally, it works better on X.org, tough Wayland isn't that far behind either.
Here’s a video of Oppenheimer saying the famous quote
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lb13ynu3Iac
He said in a later interview that he thought about the quote at the time (and, in so recalling, actually said the line in the interview). I don't think he ever claimed to have said it at the time. Though I wouldn't be surprised if the movie had him saying it for dramatic purposes.
I'm excited for the movie but also worried Nolan's worst habits when it comes to forcing non linear narratives are going to be present. It always makes me wonder if he's confident enough in the story when he does gimmicks.
https://archive.ph/VvToo
Why would anyone not think that putting a document in a public channel would result in people who can join that channel having access to it? Isn't that the whole point?
TAU team produces 'green' hydrogen with over 90% efficiency
Well then, again, I really want to protest that "the Rust community is ignoring all the [social] mistakes of the past" is a pretty harsh and unfair judgment of the Rust community.

There's only a few mentions of Rust in this thread, they're all pretty tentative and polite. The mistakes of the past include stuff like people hurling insults at each other and calling people idiot for not using a given technology.

What I'm seeing in this thread is, at most, strong-ish opinions that C is systematically bad and maybe the solution is switching to Rust. That's not being abrasive, that's being opinionated.

(And yeah, I know that I'm sealion-ing this a bit; but I do think when people say stuff like "community X is abrasive and didn't learn from the past", a non-null burden of evidence should be expected)
And FreeDSL.

https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/freedsl-goes-live/
> To your latter point, the US became significantly more bellicose after the War Department became the Defense Department (merged with the Navy Department).

Did we?

After independence, we spent about a century engaged in war with native tribes until they'd effectively been wiped out. The conflicts spanned from Florida to California, Texas to the Dakotas.

We invaded and annexed half of Mexico. We attempted to invade Canada in the War of 1812. We fought in North Africa not long after securing our independence and would do so multiple times.

We were pioneers in industrial total war which we practiced upon ourselves in the Civil War.

We won Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines from Spain in a war that had much flimsier causes than WMDs in Iraq and lacked any semblance of a noble goal.

The Department of Defense came after WWII, and while we've had our fair share of at best misguided wars since then, it's not a recent development.

That's not to say the name isn't Orwellian in nature.
Well, that would be a terrible outcome, but fortunately, it is all predicated on a misunderstanding in your first post: "The equations are a system of constraints. Means both systems are constrained in the same way." There's an isomorphism, that's all, and it's not an unexplained mystery to those who have sufficient relevant knowledge. It's pretty clear in the article, where the word 'analogy' appears more than once.
I think the EU does a lot of misguided stuff around data privacy regulations.

But this... pretty clear cut antitrust case of using a monopoly in one market to push out competitors in another.

And if you think there is no consumer harm, then you must have never been forced to switch from Slack to Teams ;)
Try GGML, llama.cpp is pretty fast
I have an ASUS PN40 that idles at 1.8W (_at the wall_). This is with one SSD and LPDDR3 memory.
> Except he didn't say it[1], or at least no-one who was there remembers him saying it, and it seems like it's something he added in a later revision of his own memory.

Oppenheimer did not say he "said it". He said he "remembered" the verse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E0r-ssYI94
I don’t know what you’re implying exactly but Telegram does collaborate with local laws in countries they operate, and that’s counting takedowns and criminal investigations when illegal content is being shared, as every business entity should do.
You might be thinking of https://encryp.ch/blog/disturbing-facts-about-protonmail/

edit: I'd like to inject a reminder that protonmail doesn't encrypt all of your mailbox contents. From their privacy policy:

"we have access to the following email metadata: sender and recipient email addresses, the IP address incoming messages originated from, attachment name, message subject, and message sent and received times"
Looks like they integrate with existing open sources for books, like OpenLibrary: https://docs.joinbookwyrm.com/adding-books.html
It's just a dream, but with TB4 or another high bandwidth PCIe interconnect, I'd be interested in seeing dockable cases not unlike the e-ports of yesteryear.

The case design would slot in the otherwise independent NUC formfactor, providing power and airflow, housing the (e)GPU and other cards, and re-enabling all the benefits of cramming things in the 5.25" drive bays on the front of your PC.

I got really frustrated recently after running out of space on my desk for all the cabling and clutter that used to live inside my computer. I had to build a rack to house new equipment to replace what was in a PIII ATX tower, and I find myself slowly losing ground to the copious adapters and peripherals I need to replicate the utility of formerly self-contained systems.
Although what did you expect, since there isn't much else to discuss about fonts that isn't subjective. We could discuss slashed vs dotted zeros, I guess.
No good reason yet (or many never). It really depends how happy you are with your current setup, Proton pass is young and clearly is still under development. A lot of the features Bitwarden or any other good password manager provides, its on the Proton pass's roadmap.

So if you are happy with your setup, stick with it and no need to move to Proton pass. Maybe keep an eye and check back after few months if their offerings have changed or upgraded that is worth the effort and shifting trust.

I personally would sign up as first year is free/cheap and I like proton products, although somewhat buggy they are trustworthy and worth supporting.
And I am using KeePass as my password manager which is cumbersome to selfhost and manage. I am not giving up on using KeePass yet as I too will wait to see where Proton pass ends up being.
This Product Is Not for You
I still have no idea what they mean by "bitmap". Obviously it is not the same thing as I think of.
Threads lasted for like a week
There's a popular patch set for Mastodon* which allows searching your local federated post cache, and non-Mastodon Fediverse software has long had this obvious and sensible feature. Gargron is now mumbling about enhancing the official Mastodon's local search.

* https://universeodon.com/@vyr/110147855442446535
This is a fine use case for using "cloud" to mean, "somewhere, not here".

I don't feel like my passwords should be stored "somewhere, not here". They should be stored "here" - where I choose to store them, and nowhere else.

I purchased a hardware password manager a while back, which seemed really neat:

https://www.beamu.io/

But, sure enough, bulk import uploads all of your passwords to their servers, even though there's just no rational reason why a server "somewhere, not here" needs to play man-in-the-middle to all your logins. To avoid it, you have to go one by one (even then there's no assurance, but the official docs do not say it's sent up to their servers).