skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m trying to parse this too and am reaching the same conclusion. Basically they seem to be implying with the “100 endpoints” number a scenario where I have 10 endpoints and change endpoint 0v1 and now call it endpoint 0v2, I must duplicate endpoints in the range 1v1 to 9v1 to go alongside my endpoint 0v2 so I serve them all together. This doesn’t make sense to me as there’s no reason to upgrade or duplicate the other nine endpoints just because I updated the first as far as I can tell.

It really reaches absurdity when the first endpoint is on its tenth iteration (the others haven’t changed) and now you’re serving ten duplicate endpoints per version, or 100 total endpoints where 90 of them are duplicate of themselves.
Pretty sure on iOS they always had to get permission, and I've never given it. As for email, i think there was a wizard when i signed up and of course i canceled it. Don't sign up in a hurry ;)

And to come back to the current topic, their app felt so bloated that I removed it.
for intra-service communication gRPC makes the most sense. the only problem with it is the code it generates. personally I am speaking from Go point of view. am not sure how other languages fare but the Go code is as far from optimal as humanly possible(essentially everything is a pointer and schema is a gzipped blob). not to mention the issues of empty map or slice vs nil that is big pain-point in Go serialization in general.
> "Despite its popularity, it has been widely regarded as pseudoscience by the scientific community."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator
Portuguese "Arrufadas" -> Hawaiian "Sweet Bread Rolls"

<3
Not sure if it's a bug or not, but the JavaScript editor seems to only try to autocomplete reserved keywords and not much more, unlike the HTML and CSS editor. I'd expect it to show me at least functions available at window., document. and console. , as an example.
https://archive.is/n3X0v - October 4, 2018
YDB v23.1 Release Webinar Recap
I've seen this narrative a lot in this thread. But if Googles ad-algorithm was actually good I'd expect to occasionally see useful ads. But Googles ad-algorithm is far from perfect. That's why people use reddit or other community aggregators to find useful products, the search engines just really suck at that task.
Same thing happened to my wife. She called Wayfair customer service, except got a scamming call center that wanted her to install some remote control app on her phone so she could send photos of the broken product. Looking where she got the number from, it was some kind of Adwords scam that seemed to have bought they keywords 'wayfair customer service'.
Arithmetic is very much a part of mathematics, it seems bizarre to me to argue otherwise.

It may very well be a trivial and uninteresting part of mathematics compared to the rest, but it’s still mathematics nonetheless.
why it makes sence more than for example using http3 with avro payload and data structures generated from json schema like swagger?
I liked that it is lightweight than codesandbox, stackblitz etc.Also, surprised that it has intellisense but it doesn't work for `console.log`.
Have used Best Travel Store for many years. No complaints. (https://www.bt-store.com/)

I haven't done any comparison to see if it is the best for finding good buys.
Venice has this problem. The whole city was built atop wood piles driven into marsh. The Sea has been trying to take the city back ever since.
We (as in, my company, not me myself) run large Cassandra clusters in the critical path of bank transaction processing (in the order of 2-25 million payments per day, each requiring a lot of database queries) and it's going pretty well...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QsLU9na2uE

But yes, you win some (mainly resilience, availability and disaster avoidance, possibly tunable consistency will help you) you lose some.
This is absolutely the most misinterpreted line in the Zen of Python. The key word there is obvious, not one.
>The NYT needs to make money to pay its Journalists.

Don't threaten me with a good time.

If j*urnos want money, they should choose to start acting in a way that deserves it at some point.
Reading between the lines of the article he battled cancer for 14 months, but his wife is currently pregnant with their first kid. So they chose to have a kid knowing he was a 57 year old with an aggressive form of cancer.
> what the next steps should be

One of the engineers in my team is an exceptional analyst, very good at debugging and explaining data issues and authoring reports that detail the situation ("what is going on?"). However, it's nearly impossible to get an evaluation ("what should be happening?") or a recommendation ("what should we do?") out of them.
Academia is rotten to the core.

My wife is doing her PhD and the stories she tells me are absolutely scary. It's about how you can easily fake your entire research, manipulate the numbers and writing a borderline fictional thesis and still earn your PhD. And all that with no oversight, and in lots of cases, the little oversight there is turns the blind eye because the professors have a lot to gain from having their name mentioned in the papers.
The problem is not with science, it is your science illiteracy. You never accept scientific research as "true" until it has been verify and repeated by independent sources. It has become the culture to glorify unexpected and "interesting" results in the media and society at large. But you should find these "interesting" but not necessary believe it to be true.

We do get unbelievable findings such as CRISPR, but beware these will be very few and far between.
No, more like “For our team’s next micro service epic are we using API v5 for it like we have been so far?”…”No we’ll upgrade to consuming API v10 as part of this epic”.

But maybe the only changes between API v5 and v10 were to 5% of the endpoints. But the other 95% of the endpoints got a new version number too. That way people can refer to “API v10” instead of “Here’s a table with a different version number for all 19,000 endpoints we’re consuming in this update on our micro service”.

It’s an organizational communication thing, not a technical thing. The “API v10” implies a singular contract. Otherwise how do you communicate different version numbers for 19,000 endpoints without major miscommunications? You couldn’t even reasonably double check the spreadsheet sent between teams. Instead it’s “just make sure to use v10”. Communication is clear this way.

Obviously this method has pros and cons, I’ve explained the pros. Also this is why chaos engineering can help by intermittently black-holing old API endpoints to encourage teams to move to new ones and finally remove the old versions entirely so you don’t ever get to 19,000 endpoints, which is the real problem.
https://archive.is/z8CGw
Ukraine takes down bot farm, seizes 150k SIM cards
That's a really good idea. We need regulation to prevent prisoners dilemma situations to the detriment of all.
Post-Retirement Cognitive Decline Varies by Race and Education
except it does not search that well...
Yeah, you can always write async code by hand. It's a pain because you have to manually yield (as in, save your context, return to the main loop, and poll for the event to complete yourself) every time you wait for IO or a timer. For simple enough systems it's managable, in larger ones it quickly becomes a pain.
You have been downvoted, but I'm not sure that's reasonable. While doctors do generally do their best, sometimes medical care is not ideal.

Your point though seems to be rooted in what happened to you as a child. I'm sorry to hear it. Could you share something about what happened please?
Pretty good tbh!
Research paper source:
https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111...

Cognitive functioning was stable before retirement (Estimate = 0.05, p = 0.322), followed by a significant decline after retirement (Estimate = −0.15, p < 0.001). The decline was particularly pronounced in White (Estimate = −0.19, p < 0.001) compared with Black (Estimate = −0.07, p = 0.077) participants, twice as large in men (Estimate = −0.20, p < 0.001) compared with women (Estimate = −0.11, p < 0.001), highest among White men (Estimate = −0.22, p < 0.001) and lowest in Black women (Estimate = −0.04, p = 0.457). Greater post-retirement cognitive decline was also observed among participants who attended college (Estimate = −0.14, p = 0.016). While greater work complexity (Estimate = 0.92, p < 0.05) and higher income (Estimate = 1.03, p < 0.05) were related to better cognitive function at retirement, neither was significantly related to cognitive change after retirement.
> Signals-based solutions are generally much more fine-grained: the framework knows which portion of the DOM was affected by the signal, and does not need to diff the entire state object

I believe this to be generally pointless. Diffs are not that expensive, DOM changes are. The only case where this would help is you have a very large diff but a small amount of actual changes. React offers tools to handle this without changing the entire state management paradigm.
That's the silliest thing for you to bikeshed about.

In a serious code review, that isn't even a starter of an issue, if you have context surrounding that variable. Furthermore `input` is an actual Python function, and shortening an example for learning purposes is not the same as asking other people do the same in production code.
Sorry for your loss. Chin up.
> Posting with throwaway because I ain’t tryna win a covert Scientology harassment and stalking op and have my family disown me which happens to virtually every former member who speaks out publicly.

What vile and quite obviously delusional people!
Regarding the kicker:

The library that does this is DisplayDoc, a library that you LD_PRELOAD in a process you want to debug, and it opens a socket that the rest of the program connects to, enabling you to debug the graphics stack. Sure it's not exactly best practices but it's not entirely unreasonable for this library to do this. They've since patched the various bugs that qualys discovered.
It's not only a great reference documentation, it also has comprehensive guides for both beginners and advanced developers. Including niche/complex features like canvas, webrtc, service workers etc.

In a web programming course I created I often referred to and leaned on MDN.

Aside:

DDG lets you search in MDN directly if you prefix a search with !mdn. It's one of the few sites that has a very much usable search feature.
It's something more like jsfiddle than a full-blown dev environment like codesandbox or stackblitz.
What the hell!? This is insanity!

> https://scienceintegritydigest.com/2023/06/27/concerns-about...
Child are typically born zero years old.
There’s a little green space guy out there with a torch.
For example if your URL scheme is /api/{version}/{path} then any new version will introduce lots of new endpoints. Most of them will work in the same way, but without checking source code you will never be sure.

Because of that I prefer to version each service instead of versioning whole API, but both of those strategies have pros and cons.
The nasal sound of pão is very difficult for foreigners.
Especially with an Idea of how they work, I find it very hard to trust them too. Doesn't help that the couple of times I asked them about something subtle, GPT gave me code with the same bugs I was trying to fix. I can see how a beginner would find it useful though.
AMD EPYC 9684X Genoa-X Provides HPC Performance Review
I think in retrospect that I was too dismissive and hyperbolic about my comment that some fields seem to enjoy having an unnecessarily complicated style, but I think the characterisation of some academic writing in the humanities having an unnecessarily complex style is ultimately fair.

I know from my own time with the humanities that some adopt that kind of style to make themselves seem more profound and out of a desire to impress others because I was one of them (although I'm happy to have comparatively flattened the ego since then).

There's obviously a diversity of intentions behind why people would adopt a complex style (although I have no doubt the motivation I had is common) and some would be justified but I don't think it's wrong of me to point out that Butler's style is needlessly complicated as an example. When reading her words in particular, I sometimes find myself rephrasing in my head to make her point more digestible to myself (and I can't help feeling that random archaic English texts like Francis Bacon's Of Simulation and Dissimulation would be more readable to most, despite the outdated and unfamiliar language).

That's a sign of needless complexity in my opinion.
good userinterface,
automatic download
Communal Bonfires
Is there no way to use vacuum chambers to fly?

Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_airship
I haven't used it, but taking a look at the website kind of makes my eyes bleed. There's a lot of clicking involved to see actual screenshots of that thing.
> Reading is selfish, elitist, and anti-social

but it's got some downsides too!
> Some varieties of UK English already used innit? that way.

Perversely, the inhabitants of Birmingham (UK) favour "issit" for that purpose.
wow great app. i have been looking for threads video downloader all over the internet
Unfortunately Libredirect went completely bonkers and is going to stop using public instances and instead will download binaries (or docker containers) (sic) to run frontends on user's device.

[0] https://github.com/libredirect/browser_extension/issues/725#...
How do people survive without bread? This may be hard to believe, but it is actually possible. The trick is eating something else. :)

(They did have steamed grain products, just not baked ones.)

Don't know about balconies.
Apparently it only runs on ugh and not mac, windows, or linux like the other browsers.
No they didn't have bread before the Portuguese arrived, but that's also to be expected given the prevalence of rice versus wheat.
You don't by any chance know where I can listen to this podcast? I tried to track it down to no avail. The links to the mp3 from the OP just send me to a 404.
There's also Grasshopper

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/grasshopper-u...
To do 2-25 million transactions per day you might as well use SQLite. Sounds like this was a career development push more than anything.
Vacuum airship
Assuming you do perfect integrity checks of the git repo you're pulling, git uses SSH and obeys ssh config for each hosts under the hood. It's safe to say that if you have forward-agent enabled git is vulnerable.
Real hackers get:

"Sorry, you have been blocked"

"You are unable to access dignitymemorial.com"

;)
Pinto, Dias, Gomes, Menezes, Mascarenhas, D'Souza, Coutinho, DeSa or D'Sa, Lobo are some other fairly common Portuguese influenced surnames in India, with the most in Goa and next most in Mumbai, but also occur elsewhere, since people move.
My issue with Arc is the non-macness of the UI. I find it a great design exercise but is not exactly what I expect from a Mac app.

Orion is much more interesting in terms of UI and also in performance, but I have to say that tab management on Arc is superior, as it has the concept of "folders", not only nested tabs. Orion has something like this planned, but there's no clear date.
I appreciate the original comment by ikekkdcjkfke, and your elaboration, gpderetta. However, I perceive a distinction between compiler optimization and proposing a fundamentally different model for handling asynchronicity. It seems to me that what you're suggesting deviates significantly from the existing C# model. Transitioning to this model wouldn't be a simple matter of compiler optimization—it would be a major breaking change that would require rethinking many aspects of the language.

Please don't misunderstand me; I'm not dismissing your proposal outright. However, it's essential to consider the potential trade-offs such as control flow management and error handling strategies. These are currently well-addressed by the async mechanism in C#.

Regarding polymorphic async-ness, I acknowledge this as a minor limitation within the current C# model. However, a common practice involves returning Task or Task<T>, even when no async calls are involved. Moreover, I find Kotlin's approach to handling this through inlining of suspend functions quite intriguing. You can check it out here: https://kotlinlang.org/docs/kotlin-tips.html#the-suspend-and...

In closing, it would be beneficial to our discussion if we could clarify whether we're contemplating an optimization within the current C# framework or proposing a fundamentally different approach to asynchronicity.
Fun fact: A subset of the linguistic community conjectures that Japanese and Korean are part of the same family as the Turkic languages. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages
I just have a pi 4 with 2 usb drives attached. All my stuff is already transcoded well (I don't do 4k), so it doesn't really need to do much other than serve the files up. Works fine for me.
MySQL master slave replication has failover, so it is technically highly available, especially if you have multiple slaves. It was also best practice back then so this argument is kind of weird.

Also, whether you need a highly available database for a company like yelp is an implementation detail.

Oh no, the database is down, how will Jonny decide where to go for lunch now?!
Does Sideberry sync its groups and configurations between Firefox instances running on different computers?
It would have to be unblocking it, and not entirely regularly:

> Follow-on observations showed that the object repeated pretty regularly, with a periodicity of about 1,320 seconds (more commonly known as 22 minutes). There's a window of about 400 seconds centered on that periodicity, and a burst can appear anywhere within the window and will last anywhere from 30 to 300 seconds.
It will save his keys though. It's a start.
https://decrypt.co/99214/square-enix-sells-off-tomb-raider-f...

> Square Enix Sells Off Tomb Raider and Three Studios to Fund NFT Games

Not everyone jumped onto the train but enough did and more would have followed if it was more successful or didn't receive as much pushback.
Intel's 14th Gen Core K-Series CPU Specs Break Cover with Speeds Up to 6GHz
What are the insurance payouts like when plants like these are destroyed? Could those be manipulated to balance the risk motives for omitting or delaying mitigations when warnings signs appear? Or would that just encourage poor record keeping and falsifications?
His comments more broadly make no sense to me.

“Over time, the quality of the applicant pool increased to the point where we really didn’t have [give legacies a boost]” - how does that work? If the applicant pool gets better, then if anything privileged groups need a stronger boost.

"Steidel said the tipping point came perhaps three or four years ago as standardized testing became optional at many institutions, including Carnegie Mellon" - is this supposed to mean that they can now boost preferred groups more easily because they don't have to overcome the testing differential, so they actually might have stronger legacy preferences than before, but better hidden?
Had a question about the "pre-warming" technique you used - why does this help? You say it helps with RAM utilization, but why?

Does it just spin up the right number of probes up so the experiments don't include this extra cost of spinning up these probes?

(apologies if this is a dumb question - I don't know enough about vector databases to know if this is a dumb question or not!)
Another way to look at it is that this isn't "people's failings." This is structural. Churches perpetuate problematic power structures and base their teachings on incoherent writings that can easily be interpreted to mean all kinds of nasty things. You can point to Jesus sayings in "true Christianity" and still have to explain yourself as to why Apostle Paul is allowed to say some crazy stuff in the same compilation text (the bible) that everyone loves to harp on. Also, didn't Jesus compare a gentile woman to a dog? Wowza that's some offensive and racist stuff.

> There are church communities that are welcoming to people that are divorced, gay, etc

There are plenty of church communities that _claim_ to be welcoming to such folks. You don't have to stick around long to see that it's not true. And it's also not hard to see why - the underlying foundations of the Christian church especially are rotten. Churches don't have full control of their congregants so churches will never be safe spaces as long as they teach from texts that are racist, sexist, and encourage illogical thinking. I _did_ church shop for a year in hip San Francisco of all places, before coming to this (obvious in hindsight) realization. TBT that time I walked into a church and the first thing they said was "Women were created to be mens' helper" - a panel with Francis Chan. Walked out pretty fast after that.

> I'd advocate, don't give up, don't dismiss religion based on people's failings, but instead, challenge people

What does that mean -- challenge people? You're encouraging folks like me to put up with endless bullshit and look for something that doesn't exist. No thanks.
> You can declaratively pass objects between web components in every web components library out there like Lit or Stencil.

This makes it a non-standard library-specific method of passing things.

I have no idea what you're arguing against.

There's literally no way to pass objects as attributes to web components. Web components had a great opportunity to get rid of attributes/properties dichotomy, but they doubled down on them.

> At least with web components there's a standard _interface_ for the components so that many different libraries can implement the declarative parts in a completely interoperable way.

Of course there's nothing standardised, and nothing interoperable. Because if one web component exposes its API through attributes, and the other one through properties, and a third one through both, never the three shall meet. Without library-specific hacks.

There's a reason the "standardized" lit uses a custom DSL to distinguish between things:

`<some-component
attribute="string only"
?boolean=${boolean}
.property=${any_js_variable}
@event_name=${callback_function}
>`

So much standardization.

Edit:

Stencil uses JSX (non-standard), so it doesn't care and probably sets properties directly, skipping attributes. For object props and HTML it says it explicitly that you cannot set them (of course): https://stenciljs.com/docs/properties#object-props

> But the question remains: where do those properties originate from? Most likely JavaScript, because HTML doesn't have any.

Indeed. That is another issue with anything web-component-related. Moar Javascript. As if we don't have enough. There are now dozens of more JS APIs existing just because of web components, and even more are incoming: https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents-cg/2022.html
I wonder how plausible it is that we just misunderstand the mechanisms driving pulsars and that it's just a plain old pulsar which just happens to be this slow due to some very rare interaction having slowed it down.
How is that LinkedIn's fault? Sounds like you're complaining about other companies making LinkedIn mandatory.
Fiat currency in Europe really dates from John Law: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/financial-history-re...

Prior to that most European countries were on one or the other of gold or silver. This got derailed by the arrival of huge amounts from the New World.
A box you can't trust to hold your keys could just as easily put a ssh -A command in your bashrc and use your agent to perform stuff on any servers your key is accepted on.
MySQL shipped replication in 2000. This whole conversation is some webscale copium bullshit. I'm out.
The pulses are rather short compared to the period of the orbit, between 30 and 300 seconds according to the article.

So if your hypothesis is correct the objects orbiting must be distributed to cover more than 3/4 of the orbit.