skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I really like this way of discovering new functionalities. It is how I discovered the bookmark searches via the star *.
Literally why I use them.
A Candid Conversation with Red Hat’s Gunnar Hellekson about CentOS Stream
Sending people with guns just because someone shared sequences of words you claim "ownership" over is a cost and harm. Society does not inherently owe you keeping your ideas exclusively controlled by you. It's a form of a artificial, but pragmatic concession in the hopes it will encourage people to produce more interesting sequences of words. If it wasn't for social consensus you would not be able to control it and wouldn't be able to do anything about it (unlike physical property, which you can physically protect).
I think by limiting the simulator to an obviously non-realistic output, they avoid the uncanny valley and unrealistic-judgement of using their operating system in lower-speced hardware.
Yeah I never see anyone on their phone
4'000 Stars and counting, a trip down memory lane
Streamer spends months training to beat record, it was taken back in one day
OneTab and Pocket seem like they might be a good fit for you.
It's the usual argument for any domain-specific language.

Personally I loathe DSLs unless you genuinely need something really fast and really simple. Otherwise please just pick something off the shelf and save everyone the headache.
Don't Use Whisper Timestamps
So, it's like a bubble in a pressured bottle of water.
It doesn't matter what goes out, it matters what goes in because that's what's required for LLMs to work
Replying from my smartphone.
Unless Human already existed and you want to inherit the functionality without retyping stuff or delegating. I think that's where the old "prefer delegation over inheritance" advice comes in but I'm not against convenience-inheritance.
In my experience over the last fours years, 1 and three are a thing of the past. I'd even say that the second is less of a problem as they added many service centers closeby. But I am not in the US. The two last ones are an increasing annoyance.
I've been a Gandi customer for over a decade. I'm willing to shell out the $4/month (for now) I get it, they have to make money. But when the aliases are no longer free: I'm out.

Having a backup plan isn't a horrible idea either... might give mail-in-a-box a try.
And people can beat people with baseball bats instead of playing baseball. Unless you have quantifiable numbers, no real discussion can be had. In the absence of numbers, I’m for allowing the purchase of baseball bats.
> I think it highlights how the system is tuned to safety over all other concerns.

To be able to focus on something above all else, you first need to be able to unequivocally define what "it" is.

What is safety? It's not always the same thing, which is why the simplistic models of these cars fail to do the right thing in some edge cases where a human would know what to do.

Generally it seems they simply slow down and stop when confused. Which unarguably is very often the safest thing to do.

But then there are the examples where the car stops, blocking emergency vehicles. Clearly not the safe thing to do. Human drivers sometimes do things like drive up into the sidewalk to clear way for an ambulance in a tight spot. Driving onto a sidewalk is nearly always the worst possible thing, but sometimes the right thing to do. It's easy for human drivers to make this judgment.
So..they read my article from 2017 [1] where i described precisely this, and then did it... cool i guess

[1] http://dmitry.gr/?r=05.Projects&proj=23.%20PSoC4
That is a good heuristic, but the hard part for people is evaluating foods at the periphery of that heuristic like chocolate and tofu and nut milk and canola oil which improve human health outcomes.

That said, and I'll quickly grant: most people in the west aren't making the mistake, say, eating too much seitan and nut milks and unsweetened 80% chocolate (all processed foods), so I won't nitpick too much.
https://www.thoughtco.com/is-anthropology-a-science-3971060

https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/sociology/sociology-is-so....

http://cognitionandculture.net/blogs/benson-salers-blog/anth...

https://etiennefd.substack.com/p/the-difference-between-scie...

I define science as anything that is scientifically rigorous. That does not include humanities or social sciences, arts, philosophy, history etc.

Social science is not a science (I could agree on field of study) because there are too many possibilities involved in human psyche. "“Many researchers fail to consider that their measurements of brains, behavior and self-reported experience are profoundly influenced by their subjects' culture, class and experience, as well as by the situation in which the research is conducted,”"

An example of how social science can be dangerous is of how many people take the "Milgram experiment
" canon, Eugenics, IQ, Social Darwinism, ... policy making based on social science studies .. It all goes into the same basket to me.
You are free to make things unavailable, why should my tax money be spent on criminally charging people that do not conform to your preferences?
> cloud craze.

Automatic scaling is great. Cloud parallelization (a.k.a fork) is absolutely wild once you get it rolling. Code deployments are incredibly simple. Never having to worry about physical machines or variable traffic loads is worth the small overhead they charge me for the wrapper. The generic system wide permissions model is an absolute joy once you get over the learning curve.
Some books absolutely do not lend themelves to a digital format. I'm currently in the middle of House of Leaves and there are sections of it that play with the fact they are printed on paper.
One note is that most of the crops grown for seed oil are "high oleic" varieties that produce a fat makeup more similar to Canola oil than you'd previously see for those crops.
> we have built a sophisticated moderation protocol to neutralize and quickly ban people that contribute negatively as it is a priority people feel safe and comfortable in this community.

This seems a firm stance against objective truth. Your scoring algorithm benefits answers that people want to receive, and you actively penalize truthful but disliked answers.

"I feel I am fat. What should I do?"

The truthful answer is something like diet modification, but the answer most likely to make someone feel safe and comfortable is "no, you're not fat".
I think that makes complete sense. After all, something similar already happens with trademarks: if you don't use it, it lapses. Presumably companies only invest time and money on using the trademarks they expect to yield a return on that investment; if they aren't making money off of it, why should they get to keep others from doing so?
Getting Julia to statically compile is not even that hard anymore. I think people are merely turned off by the lack of a (consistent, well supported) story around distributing Julia apps as single, statically-compiled binaries.
Nukes can be placed on many different delivery mechanisms, including planes and missiles. Any type of nuke is too destructive to ignore, placing them too close to Russia cuts the chance of interception.

Iran can also claim that its nuclear enrichment is peaceful, and they have no intention (FOR NOW!) of developing nuclear weapons. Why not just believe them? That logic is native and stupid. Country leaders aren’t supposed to totally ignore the very real possibility that experts say is easy to achieve.

“Cool. But this is about Russia.”

Funny how this tactic is used over and over by the USA. “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, that’s whataboutism.” “Stop pointing out double standards and hypocrisy, that’s whataboutism.” “We are only here to talk about this other country. Sure if the situation was reversed we’d do a lot worse, but this isn’t about us.”

Oh how convenient. The same tactic is used by pretty much anyone with an agenda. Everyone outside the bubble is rightly exasperated by this technique of shutting down all possible good faith discussion. It is also why the rest of the world outside the NATO bubble (especially the global south) doesn’t buy what the US is selling… neither that NATO is purely defensive, nor that US hegemony is a net good, nor that Russia’s reaction was “unprovoked”. Really, people polled around the world outside the NATO bubble blame NATO and USA. For years, since 2003 at least. Every year. It’s just not reported here.

I am glad you support countries joining military alliances against each other. Worked very well for triggering WW1, but I’m sure that will never happen again.

By the way, joining an economic alliance like BRICS is far more peaceful and I support it.

> “Your source”

Did you watch the video? I don’t care who says the facts as long as they say true facts. The substance is what matters. The pitch where the guy attempts to invite his viewers to learn how to be unscrupulous comes at the very end of the video - I found it weird and ignored it. The rest of the video is great and exposes BlackRock’s role in plundering Ukraine.

But hey — we know how the establishment operates by now. Assange reveals their corruption, but they are more upset that it was revealed, not the corruption itself. And same here. The video exposes the truth with all mainstream sources - so adhominem and don’t watch it!
Yes, but that wasn’t the question when it comes to “updating a game creates a new work”.
>Eat whole foods

Vegetable oil/soybean oil/canola oil/other refined oils is not a whole food.

Unrefined olive oil, butter/ghee, lard etc is.
Maybe the outcome would have been different had he founded a Web4 or Web5 company. Lacks vision.
Why? Because we're nearing the theoretical limits or because AI will be too dumb to help or for other reasons?
It's pretty well established that folks pay to get featured on that list.

Forbes is not exactly a reputable organization; it's the clickbait of finance. Take one look at their website and this will be quite apparent.
> I'd suggest they scrap this whole plan and go with something drafted by a team who hasn't drank the engagement kool-aid

What teams come to mind for you?
I was thinking about all this recently and came up with the question:

In the event that someone fails, is it possible for it to be you?

There are people who cannot fail at their jobs. I want one of those jobs. An upper manager who attends meetings and "makes decisions" and is personal friends with the CEO often cannot fail. If the product stops selling, it will be considered a failure of those below the upper manager and the team will be laid off, the upper manager cannot fail.
I see no indication that they’ve learned anything

To be fair, it was Yahoo that banned NSFW but Automattic are the current owners of the property.
With respect, I would like to see some evidence of your assertion that anonymous communication results in higher quality content than when the question answerer is known. The highest quality information content I'm aware of is in textbooks and scientific journals where the author's reputation is on the line. Contrast that with the wall of a public restroom, which is pure shitposts.

You might be correct if the assertion is the latter is more reflective of how an average Internet user actually feels at any given moment but won't admit in polite company.
I don't think I understand who Tumblr is for anymore, or, maybe I just don't know who it was ever for.

I'm not sure any of this is actually coherent or makes sense. They're all points that could be applied to any social network.

Maybe Tumblr itself no longer knows who it's serving.
There would just be loopholes that can’t realistically be closed. Like they sell only physical copies out of one location in a rural place that is basically inaccessible. I’m also not for forcing people/companies to maintain an online marketplace of their goods.
Tweeted Sep 21, 2010, might still be true for EC2 VMs though.
Looks like it defaults to using `-accel hvf`, roughly analogous to KVM, so no.
How do my photos get onto this system? I don't see it from the docs.
I'm already convinced[0] the effect is small, if it exists at all. However I thought of another experiment that might be easier to perform, to see if there is any effect at all: take two crystals, as similar in depth as one can make them, with two different isotopes, and measure the difference in index-of-refraction. Silicon (28 and 30?) would probably be good for this, as would laser interferometry. (Maybe the Gravity Probe B people have some extra pure isotope wafers they'd be willing to lend?) If I'm right then the Si-30 sample will have a slightly larger index of refraction than the Si-28 sample. Someone needs to do the math though because if the effect is far less than like one layer of atoms, or a few impurities here and there, then the experiment isn't worth doiong.

0 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36671605
> Other ways to think about it: Just because Java standard library has a generic List -> LinkedList or ArrayList etc..., doesn't mean your software related to

> managing Patients does NOT mean you need this complication:

> Human <- BillablePerson <- Patient (this is somewhat whacky).

Also: class hierarchies don't have to match real-life hierarchies. Often I find it more useful to implement hierarchies that make the program flow and algorithms work more smoothly and accept hierarchies that don't mirror anything in the physical world.
Just a note about your 'exported memory allocation' API:

struct hamt_allocator {
void *(*malloc)(const size_t size);
void *(*realloc)(void *chunk, const size_t size);
void (*free)(void *chunk);
};

This whole thing could just be:

struct hamt_allocator {
void *cookie;
void* (*realloc) (struct hamt_allocator* h, void* chk, const size_t size);
};

With the following constraints:

1. `realloc(H, nullptr, N)` -- allocated N bytes

2. `realloc(H, p, 0)` -- frees the pointer p

3. `realloc(H, p, N)` -- resizes the pointer p

And, the user has access to a 'context' (`cookie`) so they can use a (for instance) pool allocation scheme. Personally, I like a slightly different API:

struct hamt_allocator {
void *cookie;
void* (*realloc) (struct hamt_allocator* h, void* chk, const size_t oldsize, const size_t newsize);
};

With the following constraints:

1. `realloc(H, nullptr, 0, N)` -- allocated N bytes

2. `realloc(H, p, N, 0)` -- frees the pointer p

3. `realloc(H, p, N, M)` -- resizes the pointer p

But I know a lot of people get confused and/or don't like having to pass (& thus keep) so much information to the allocator.
I could produce similar summaries based on the summaries of these books and discussions of them that are posted online. I think the easiest defense is to show that all the information shown in the plaintiffs' exhibits is also freely available online.
Ask HN: Are HN downvotes appropriate for mere disagreements?
I realized that the HN Guidelines page does not talk about downvotes. I want to solicit some community-wide consensus on when downvoting a comment is appropriate. I'd like to broadly categorize comments into several types, arranged in order of appropriateness to use downvotes:

1. Anything that's not constructive or not in good faith. Trolls, personal attacks, etc.

2. Anything that's interesting but off topic.

3. Anything that's relevant and interesting, but the comment has factual errors.

4. Anything that's relevant and interesting, but primarily opinion-based and you disagree with that opinion.

I noticed that I sometimes perhaps downvote a little too much. Perhaps we should standardize on only downvoting 1,2,3 but not 4? Or perhaps we do want to downvote all four, or only the first two? Any thoughts?
>analyzing vegetable oils is pointless

On a personal scale perhaps. On a commercial scale though - similar to what happened to trans fats - and given how much vegetable oil is in processed food, a conclusive result could have a monumental impact on the food supply
ghee is refined butter and you could argue butter is refined cream. Those definitions are all fuzzy and context-dependant.
So why isn't GM getting out there and saying "don't worry, you can still use CarPlay"?

Unless the GM fork will prohibit it to maximize the data flowing to Google?
This is a problem I've seen too but I haven't dug into it. Could you try specifically asking what extra information the llm would want in order to give the best answer (or e.g. what information is missing) to push it to answer that question specifically?
Unborked link: https://simple.industries/notes/chesterton's-fence.html

Looks like the single quote doesn't play nicely with the auto-linker.
25-50% for domain names is too much for me, I'm switching to pork bun as my domains come up for renewal.
I don't think anyone would drive with a cone on their hood, unless they had no other choice (i.e. they could not remove it).
Yes, it would be nice if the Powerwall 3 had LiFePO4 batteries. I believe Tesla does not accept liability if a Powerwall burns your house down, so something without Li-Ion batteries would be better.
Effectively a stealth tax for most graduates, if they can't ever hope to repay it. But regressive if you're rich enough to pay it off… or never have need for it to begin with.
Google's "quantum supremacy" paper was about a 53 qubit chip in 2019 [1]. This year, they reported having 70 qubits [2]. Looking at the papers (and supplements), the gate fidelities and qubit lifetimes have stayed roughly the same. This really doesn't look like anything like Moore's law to me.

[1] https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5

[2] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11119
TLD-List – registrar price comparison by TLD
Well there goes any remaining chance I’d be buying a GM - why would I ever want my car to provide all my driving information to a spyware company?
I worry that the author isn't seeing the possible impact they can have by doing work that is driven by making money. Yes, the work itself might not lead to the changes in society they want but climbing that ladder can give them the money, power and influence to really make an impact.

Money is only a means to an end.

That said the amount of dishonest scammy behavior around the crypto world is terrible. You don't want to be part of that. You still have to make an honest living to make the world a better place.
The only other issues on the internet I see are Prolexic (A big DDoS scrubbing network), Reddit and a few other prior blips for CF and Level 3. [1] Nothing on IWM [2] Are you by chance on Level 3? Otherwise no idea.

I can reach them from Los Angeles, Toronto Canada, Fremont CA, the Rocky Mountains. Ill try from a few more places.

[1] - https://www.thousandeyes.com/outages/

[2] - https://www.internetweathermap.com/
Wonder if Musk and co. will view this as a marketing opportunity. "Forget Threads! Twitter is the free speech nexus of the online universe!"
Long story short: I decided to start using a separate laptop for work/tech stuff. Setting it up has been a bit of a pain: https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxmint/comments/14vzvex/on_hp_la...

To answer your question specifically, I'm used to "English (intl, with AltGr dead keys)" but in Linux Mint there are like 20 options. I was trying "US, intl, AltGr Unicode combining" or perhaps "US, intl, with dead keys" or such. (I've tried about a dozen in the last 2 days.) Instead of an apostrophe, they were generating what could become an accent mark, a stress mark or diacritic depending on the next letter. On "with AltGr dead keys" you must use right alt+apostrophe for that effect. (The quotation marks would do the same thing.)

Anyway, the keyboard lets me type things like þðßáœßðfhëü´6´^¨¼²³¤` with 2 buttons like shift to make a capital! This is good for German, Spanish and French, but Hungarian and Romanian require 3 buttons, then a 4th which is more tedious.
left alt shift 5 = ş ţ romanian
left alt shift 3 = ā lines for latin
left alt shift 2 = ű ő - hungarian long umlaut

If you really want to learn about ways to enter writing systems, this is a wild ride: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_input_methods_for_comp...
> Show you content from people you aren't following

If it's clearly delineated, like "You may also be interested in...", it may be fine and actually helpful. If it's mixed into your regular feed, much less so.
The words "safe" and "comfortable" indicate to me that this will be an overcensored hugbox where they'll sell your data to the largest bidder. Only having a mobile app is also a huge red flag.
Novel electrification method used to desalinate water at scale
I’ve never taken a trip under those conditions, but my Navigation has rerouted me to a less-busy charger, which is something that gas stations generally don’t have the ability to do.
It seems they have a relationship per AWS's docs [1] for handling certain TLDs. In particular this calls out using Gandi to verify transfer of .*.uk domains. I'd be very surprised, however, if that that deal is tied to consumer pricing.

[1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/do...
“Refined oil” has a specific documented definition, and to be clear I’m talking about chemical refinement. See here: https://youtu.be/Cfk2IXlZdbI

The distinction you are making is irrelevant and trollsome
Evaluate LLMs Generated SQL
This link contains some methods to get a confidence score for SQL queries.
We don't have to change any vocabulary. Noon and midnight happen at different times in different places and that would be fine. We know it's fine, because that's how it currently is in China.

Most servers run on UTC under the hood, and a lot of big organizations have experience already in terms of doing all timekeeping calculations in UTC. It may seem weird, but works pretty well in the long run -- and not having to deal with corner cases like DST or geographical ambiguities around time is extremely valuable.

Have you ever thought about what it's like to live near the edge of a timezone? In a city where half the city uses one time and half uses the other?
https://archive.ph/ryuAV
Yes but it's a lot of work to integrate with literally over a hundred different TLD registries to provide full spectrum domain registration coverage. And it's not just technically difficult; there's lots of work to do from a legal/biz dev standpoint as well.

Much easier to integrate with a reseller and have them do a lot of that for you. Then you can only worry about the big ones (e.g. Verisign for .com), and maybe slowly onboard to additional ones over time.
So ECDHE becomes EC(Post Quantum Exchange)? Am I understanding that correctly?
US Army Physical Fitness Test: Normative Data on 6022 Soldiers (1994)
> But companies like Google and Facebook get to play by different rules

It's simple, copyrighted materials can be used for academic research. That's what they are doing. Trying new AI modes, publishing results, etc. Facebook doesn't make money on LLaMA, they even require permission to use their models for, again, academic research.
Olive oil isn’t a whole food. Neither is butter, ghee, nor lard.

If you extract and concentrate some fraction of a food and eat it disproportionately to what is present in the whole product, you are by definition consuming a not-whole thing.
The new syntax isn't syntactically valid Javascript. It's valid syntax inside a transpiler language like Babel.

It doesn't have to be in quotes because the tool, like Babel, has tokenization and parsing rules for it which disambiguate it somehow. It basically is a kind of quote. Or, well quasiquote. Just like " introduces a textual quote, a token sequence like <div> introduces a HTML quasiquote.

You can transform a language into JS that doesn't look like JS in any regard. So of course you can transform one that looks like JS, but does weird things that would be syntax errors in JS.