skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not precisely, in that KSM does it after the fact while OpenVZ has it occur as a consequence of its design, on the loading of the program.

See (OpenVZ) "Containers share dynamic libraries, which greatly saves memory." It's just 1 Linux kernel when you are running OpenVZ containers.

https://docs.openvz.org/openvz_users_guide.webhelp/_openvz_c...

See (KVM/KSM): "KSM enables the kernel to examine two or more already running programs and compare their memory. If any memory regions or pages are identical, KSM reduces multiple identical memory pages to a single page. This page is then marked copy on write."

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterp...

In KVM's defense, it supports a much wider range of OSes; OpenVZ only really does different versions of Linux, while KVM can run OpenBSD/FreeBSD/NetBSD/Windows and even OS/2 in addition to Linux.
Because it’s very straightforward and has less assumptions and weird features than most other interpretations, and it has seen the most advancements in quantum fundamentals research
Markdown and html can display local images. The only tricky thing is if you want to place images in separate folders and how you maintain that structure over time.

I believe that charts and diagrams convey a lot of information that cannot be easily reproduced with raw text. I guess it ultimately depends on the topic you are reviewing.
It's not the GNU part that's the issue here.
More sophisticated text searching across thousands of academic papers is always desirable, but students will have to see the sources themselves to cite optimally.

Any graduate program worth their salt make students do group work and defend theses in person.
By that logic, it should be fine to have a big obvious "enable telemetry?" button that's disabled by default, right? Because otherwise you're just assuming that people will ignore it and leave things on the default setting, and claiming that it's okay to exploit that to enable telemetry.
What are the happiest jobs? What are the unhappiest? (2011)
Not just breaking the record, but by a substantial margin, nearly a full degree Fahrenheit. And we may break it again this year.

That record may well stand for a while. El Niño makes this year unusually warm, and it may take a while for global climate change to catch up to that when we don't have El Niño. But the next time we break the record, it could be a real catastrophe, because that will likely come when the ordinary temperature has reached what is today an extraordinary record.
This used to be baked into Chrome too but they removed it. I'm guessing to juice the Google search metrics.

https://twitter.com/googlechrome/status/1504858912692084745
As a professional dev who has made a career out of working in oop languages and codebases, it took me far too long to realize that when it comes to oop, the emperor has no clothes.

To this day, oop advocates can't even agree on what oop even is or means.

Apparently oop as envisioned by Alan Kay was supposed to work like cells in the body that pass messages between each other and take actions independently.

Why? Who knows! It was never really explained why literally one of the most complex systems imaginable, one that we still really have very little idea how it even works, should be the model for what could and should probably be a lot simpler.

Today's modern oop languages are probably very far from what Kay envisioned (whatever that was), but it's remains unclear why classes and objects are "better" than the alternatives.

And before anyone goes and comments aksully code organization blabla like yes but code organization can be great or shit in oop or fp or procedural codebases, it has nothing to do with the "paradigm".

Let alone that the entrenched, canonical, idiomatic coding styles of most modern oop languages encourage state, mutability, nulls, exceptions and god knows how many trivially preventable entire classes of errors. Granted, most have now started to come around and are adopting more fp features and ideas every year, but still.

Don't get me wrong, writing programs like cells in the body that pass messages between each other and take actions independently is an interesting idea which deserves pursuing, if nothing else but to satisfy our curiosity and seeing to what if anything it's applicable and suited. (and even if the answer turns out to be "nothing", we've still learned something!)

But going from there to making strong claims about it being a more or less universally superior paradigm for computing and writing code, with little to zero evidence, that's a huge, huge stretch.

To the degree Erlang and Actors work, I think that's kind of a happy coincidence, and not due to any rigorous work on Alan Kay's part.
Also ctrl-shift-t to undo close tab
so why haven't they already stopped if it is already trivial to download nearly any new piece of media?
I disagree with you. Its over 10 years ago I medaled in an national powerlifting competition. Nowadays I just want to lift some weights, and have no intention of following a set program ad I have no end goals other than to keep healthy and fit. I'm pretty sure im not the only one who likes some variation without going full crossfit.
The High Performance Backend is written in Rust.

> nextcloud is still a buggy php app (without swoole) and owncloud is a completely rewritten in golang.

I'm just getting started with Nextcloud & did some research into the topic. My take is they are going to keep PHP due to legacy & interoperability reasons.

How is the DX in making an Owncloud App? Also, are there open source alternatives to their Enterprise features, such as Microsoft integration?
Rotating house [video]
Co-author Vance O. Packard's 1957 book "The Hidden Persuaders" was a best-seller.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vance_Packard
NixOS and my descent into insanity
Second-order effects matter, though: If everyone is allowed to steal books, what's the incentive for experts to write new ones, and for the publishers to reward them for it?

Btw, not a fan of "but what about the kids" rhetoric: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children
They grow their business to prove that their dicks are bigger -- metaphorically, until now.

So we do finally agree --- in a circular, roundabout manner.

They *do* need something to be good for business --- otherwise, they can't grow their business and prove their dick is bigger.

In any case; acting like a megalomaniac is counterproductive to achieving this objective.
Yet not as young as some people are inclined to think. For example, Charles Dickens was known for pushing for international copyright [1] (domestic copyright was already well established). I acknowledge that he wrote fiction, while you're primarily talking about non-fiction, but the point that it's not recent recent still stands

Also you've said yourself that many people can and are offering their work for free. Awesome. So I would prefer not to force others to (though I would certainly be up to consider repealing many of the posthumous copyright extensions that are fairly recent)

[1] https://www.charlesdickensinfo.com/life/copyright-laws/
If Meta & OpenAI already admitted to have trained using pirated books, how have they not been sued so far?
I'm happy to get into the subjective stuff you've outlined, although you're not OP, but before I do, can I just make sure you're clear on what I'm asking for on the laptop thing?

I said:

> look at the single core performance, battery life, and screen quality of the original 13" M1 MacBook Air. Now find me a laptop with commensurate performance at the same price point from that time.

1. Single core performance

It looks like the M1 which shipped in the 13" MacBook Air massively outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 3500U[^1] on Geekbench 5 single core: 1710 vs. 707.

Am I missing something?

2. Battery life

Here's a comparison[^2] of the M1 MacBook Air with the laptop you referred to from the same publication. The M1 MacBook Air scored >29hrs on the battery rundown test: "It ran for 29 hours and 1 minute on our battery rundown test, producing one of the longest results we’ve ever recorded." The Ideapad was about 1/3rd of that at 8hrs: "Eight and a half hours away from a wall outlet isn't bad…"

Am I missing something?

3. Screen quality

The same reviews refer to the Ideapad having a "mediocre" screen. It's 1920x1080, but the resolution is only 142ppi. The M1 MacBook Air is higher resolution and higher PPI (227) and 13" not 15". The disparity in quality between them almost couldn't be starker.

Am I missing something?

Happy to talk to someone who can at least try to offer substantiation for their perspectives, but it feels like we're missing each other on this.

[^1]: https://versus.com/en/amd-ryzen-5-3500u-vs-apple-m1/geekbenc...

[^2]: https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/lenovo-ideapad-3-15-2021, https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/apple-macbook-air-m1-late-2020
libvirt supports other hypervisors than QEMU, such as VirtualBox, Xen and LXC.
Can Google's federated learning strategy be exploited?
I thought this was interesting:

People Who Should Not Marry at All

Qualifications for Marriage Percentage Voting for Them
Freedom from venereal disease 100%
Freedom from feeble-mindedness
(If sterilized, 24% would permit marriage) 99%
Freedom from insanity 97%
Freedom from criminality 94%
Freedom from dipsomania 91%
Freedom from drug addiction 85%
Freedom from neuroticism 76%
Proof by groom that he can support bride
(This includes evidence of occupational proficiency
and at least $150 in savings) 69%
Record of no more than one divorce, if any 50%
I didn't want to go into all the technical details, but we have another write-up that goes into details about RAM management: https://github.com/hocus-dev/hocus/blob/main/rfd/0003-worksp...

Other than making sure we release unused memory to the host, we didn't customize QEMU that much. Although we do have a cool layered storage solution - basically a faster alternative to QCOW2 that's also VMM independent. It's called overlaybd, and was created and implemented in Alibaba. That will probably be another blog post. https://github.com/containerd/overlaybd
I’m a “believer” in the Everett Interpretation (on the grounds that it’s the simplest interpretation) but I can’t see how such an experiment could prove anything. This experiment seems to assume we can keep the whole apparatus including the Geiger counter and the mechanism to move the cannon ball from becoming entangled with the environment (decohering). This seems very far outside the realm of current technology.
>The point is that it's important to decide these decisions prior to starting the project.

It really isn't. Again, that's when the least is known. I think a much better point to set a particular standard is when there's some sort of team disagreement that would be solved by setting a standard. At which point you'll have more information than you would have had before starting.

> I've seen more than a few engineers throw the term "tech debt" around as a justification for rewriting everything to their preference.

Sure, and that's bad. But it's bad because there's a dispute over the team definition of "good design" that needs to get resolved by the team. One way to avoid that becoming a massive problem is to regularly set/update design decisions as circumstances demand it. Because sticking with bad or out-of-date choices made before the project started is a good way to create the sort of tension and chaos where "rewrite it all in shiny new framework X" can seem like a good idea.
> What's your point?

Perhaps that the number of people who already know Python is significantly larger than those who already know CL?

For example, the intro to programming classes that physicists take (ie those that might end up writing HPC code) at the University I went to has been Python-based for well over a decade.
Cool explanation! I use quite a lot of SVG visualisations generated server-side. Some basic charts (including sparkline) are bundled up into ContEx (an elixir library) - see https://contex-charts.org/ (disclosure - author).
Made tens of thousands on online poker from 2002 for about 5 years. Then the gov't decided online poker is bad. Meanwhile 20 years later if you watch sports on TV, every second TV commercial is a sports betting website.
All I want for this dumb thing is to

* correct ttps:// to https://

* stop searching internet for local hostname I type into the bar
+1 for requestAnimationFrame. SMIL animations are cool until you try doing 1,000 of them. Still, I do agree that SVG is underutilized. Not only can it do so much more but it has effects that can be used in conjunction with DOM elements. Things like dropshadow, glow, blur, greyscale, duotone, etc. Check out this SVG glitch effect [0]

[0] https://codepen.io/DirkWeber/pen/YzBYWY
Thanks. I thought llama.cpp got CUDA capabilities a while ago? https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/1827
You might want analytics when your personal blog is a medium for pushing referral links though.
Post proof that your preferred style of workout is better overall.
Axios is (i think) unreadable in that way
>The Bayesian priors are: PFAS are poisonous to humans (known). PFAS are everywhere in our environment (known). We are seeing population-scale effects similar to what you’d expect to see from population-scale PFAS poisoning (noisy).

It's a leap in logic to go from "PFAS impairs reproductive health" to "PFAS is a significant contributor to fertility decline". Your bayesian logic does not make sense. We know of dozens of other factors that are also casually known to lower fertility, and are pervasive in our society/environment. They can be contributors, but they can't all be significant contributors.

Again, repeating my prior comment: I'm not claiming PFAS generate zero effects on fertility. I claiming that there isn't good evidence that it's a significant factor in fertility decline.
Care the elaborate? I'm not challenging you I'd just like to learn more. I recently transitioned from writing C++ to Typescript and probably haven't fully grokked the TS way.
Because picking a good marriage partner is ableist. That's why it's controversial.

For example, people prefer good looking people as marriage partners. That makes people who are not good looking sad. And you can imagine for other traits like income, age, height, social status.
Is there any detail as to what the chip did before the change, and no longer did after? Did Intel change the spec of the chip, or was IBM leveraging undocumented behavior?
That failure mode is not isolated to tech, and predates modern org structures too. See Chesterton’s Fence (https://simple.industries/notes/chesterton's-fence.html).
I kind of hate the way they handle write calls, they tell you to just try it and if it fails with a readonly error your app has to respond with a specific header that lets fly redirect the whole request to the main region.
On one hand it's fairly trivial, on the other it adds quite a bit of latency and now you need to customize your application code to the service(s) you're using, breaking portability.
Since in their pg stack already includes proxies, I'd love for them to have the proxy simply redirect write queries to the correct location instead.
Hi! Can you briefly explain the process? I'm linux and k8s admin and thinking about writing a book.

Thanks a lot!
I have a literal signed copy from her at the HBS book signing. I feel cheated and lied to.
Okay? Facebook lets you create multiple profiles using the same account.

In your example the problem was that someone's mom was reading all of their posts and not that they wanted to use different login information for each profile.
Judging by how you feel it necessary to even ask such a ridiculous question, I strongly doubt you would accept any answer but that which supports your anachronistic views.
I’ve been using Linux and BSD for twenty years and never ran an OS I couldn’t update to the next release, with the exception of elementary. Some make it easy and some don’t but elementary OS was the only one to say “sorry, no upgrade path for you.”
I don't think that's even true. Where are you getting this? I can create an extremely compute heavy model that performs very poorly. Just adding more compute does not mean better performance on its own.

Given the same model too much compute can even mean over-fitting and worse generalization. It doesn't all come down to compute.
A Complete Guide to Lidar: Light Detection and Ranging
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it a lot lately. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for, so we eventually have to ban such accounts.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
> I'm always wary of waking US colleagues up with my unimportant notifications

Some notifications are important.
I live near another university with a puppetry degree (University of Connecticut), and while I’m well past undergraduate, having gotten my doctorate from a school that has a bagpiping major, the presence of a puppetry degree has made my and my family’s lives richer.

There’s definitely a place for fine arts such as puppetry. It has made me wonder about difficult topics (not all puppetry is for kids), laughed during musicals, explained difficult concepts to kids, and most importantly brought joy into the world. However, we just haven’t figured out how to financially support it as a society. I’m glad that Connecticut continues to support such a program.
Oracle: Keep Linux open and free; we couldn't figure out any way not to...
> The latter is actually pretty good - been using it for a couple of months

You must be using a different New Outlook than me. I've been conscripted into trying it before the mass rollout to the rest of my company. It's so slow and missing so many features from the Old Outlook that it's only really usable for the most basic tasks.
When was the last time an insider made one?
Interestingly, in Microsoft Edge, entering `%` does the same as typing `@tabs <tab>`. And `^` as `@history`.
> They aren't all degenerates, you are putting emphasis on something no one ever said, but they are obviously unwilling or they would not need special treatments.

Holy hell active misrepresentation much? Or is your reading comprehension just that poor?

You even quoted it yet didnt actually read it?

> So long as they are viewed as degenerates unwilling to engage in basic care

VIEWED AS

That's not remotely the same as actually being such.

Your whole diatribe is the same disingenuous, misrepresentative, seemingly deceptive, bs.

I'm not engaging with someone so dishonest, regardless of their intentionality.

Be better.
If the incentive structure were even tilted a bit to make reporting negative or ambiguous results less career-damaging, we would see much less of this

I don't see how we do this. Ultimately, the buck stops with the public. Governments fund the sciences because the public demands it. If scientists spend more time reporting negative or ambiguous results then the public begin to question what they're paying for.

People want breakthroughs and scientific revolutions, not "business as usual." And this bias is not limited to the public, scientists themselves want to see new science.
Ok I know I shouldn't let that get to me, but, re: "Was expecting a lousy post due to some typos in the text"

A) that's... rude/gatekeepy?
B) what typos? I simply cannot find what you're talking about

Stylistic choices are not typos, I wonder if there hasn't been some mixup there? Folks usually use the feedback system to report typos, which then get fixed. You're probably not gonna see this so shrug, but, for the record: not cool.
Wait, isn't there still a huge industry of self-help books focused on relationships and romance?
I hope it happens. I'd love to see a market for selling training licenses to IP. This could be a small but real source of passive income for artists, authors, poets who don't mind that their IP being used in training sets. I wouldn't be practical to negotiate individually with each artist but I could see something work with larger collectives than can vouch for the quality of their members. Think like publishers, galleries, guilds or unions. It could offer a license and then share the proceeds with all members.

It's just flat out unethnical for LLMs to just soak up all this data, even off torrent sites(!!!), without any consent or agreement with the IP holders. Some model like this could be a win for everyone
Great tips although I wish they'd link to the original source:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/address-bar-autocomplet...
I find it hard to imagine a use-case for thousands of sparklines on screen at the same time! And if it’s not on screen, you don’t need to render it.

Instead of using svg files, just include them in the html, and make them simple. Each svg sparkline only needs to be two elements (the <svg> tag and one <path>), which is crazy efficient.

Canvas uses one element, instead of two, but you have to create a custom implementation of path rendering and do all that work in JavaScript instead of native browser APIs.

Canvas pulls ahead with drawing complex images where you have a single pixel buffer representing thousands of individual “shapes” because the DOM itself is optimized for interaction, not just drawing pixels, but I think that’s a different use-case from sparklines.
Microsoft's Azure West Europe region blew away in freak summer storm
Mirrord as an Alternative to Telepresence
This does not read like a corporate blog lol. It’s so passive aggressive and has minor insults all over the place.
What a time to be able to read.
There is not much wrong with doing a competent job of consolidating a trailing-edge product category. Especially when you have the best ad tech and largest audience.
Some (not all) projects are indeed "copying" the OpenAI APIs; ex: https://github.com/go-skynet/LocalAI/issues/588
I also went through this book for a GIS course in grad school and put together some Python notebooks.
https://github.com/gbrunner/islr-for-gis
As a middle manager I found that you traffic in clarity.

Figuring out what ground truth is at the team level and effectively summarizing it to communicate up and sideways.

Figuring out what's happening around the company and identifying any connections to what your teams are working on then communicating that up and down.

Figuring out what's happening in the company at large then effectively communicating then identifying anyway your teams' work might be out of line with the directions things are moving.

In other words ensuring alignment, doing that efficiently (don't waste people's time).

That is something that is something that is totally in your control.
>But it's detrimental to a progressive/scienctific-like approach to lifting.

Uh, sources for that? As I powerlifter I have lifted with world class lifter who have a huge variations in their exercises. Bands,chains, boxes, pause/no pause, grip width, stance width.
The same is available in Chrome. I made a list of shortcuts I use here [0] -- copying a few favorites below:

shortcut: "aw", lets you type: "aw s3", "aw iam", etc.
https://console.aws.amazon.com/%s

shortcut: "amzn", searches the retail side
https://www.amazon.com/s/?field-keywords=%s

shortcut: "gm", searches through gmail (change the 0 if you use multiple accounts)
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/%s

shortcut: "maps", searches google maps
https://www.google.com/maps/search/%s/

shortcut: "img", searches google images
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=%s

shortcut: "wp", goes directly to the article if it exists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%s

shortcut: "yt", searches youtube
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=%s

[0] https://github.com/gregsadetsky/custom-search-engines
I don't really think compounds save all that much time because the rest period required for them is so much longer than for isolation movements. If you prefer compounds, great (so do I), but there's been so much gospel online about them and I don't think it's substantiated.