skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Usually at risk a ban, buuuuut....
Every other app that I mentioned and is dead used either Facebook or Instagram graph. None survived.
I'm replying to the comment not the article.
It does rather come down to expectations, doesn't it.

I (and this is just me) expect my local library to carry 125 year old stage plays such as The Importance of Being Earnest .. and it does.

I expect an online libray of AV media to carry copies of material that was influential and popular when I was 30 .. (such as the anime series under discussion).

If Crunchyroll is just service that focuses upon trending bleeding edge viral latest fad material then so be it.

That by no means makes the plays of Oscar Wilde nor the popular culture of our youth obscure .. it just means that those that don't look outside a particular bubble won't see a bigger landscape.
Incoming!

Apologies for the delay.
(didn't read article, but...)

If the relationship doesn't survive the smartphone, the relationship probably wouldn't have survived anyway.

Relationships that survive smartphones are able to communicate properly and interact with each other and able to prioritise their life duties etc.

If it wasn't the smartphone or would be some other distraction as the cause of tension. PlayStation, Xbox, sports cars, fishing, going out with the lads, shopping, watching reality television, tinkering in the shed, anything but doing the little bits of relationship maintenance that prevent it from falling apart.
Fundamentally we have only 1 problem worth solving: how to support 11bn people sustainably and equitably by 2050 (that's when the population peaks and levels out).

you can do a Wardley map that shows the needs of those people, then you can move down the chain of needs, until you find something you're apt to solve.

Personally I'm working on reducing eWaste by providing a global solution to carrying multiple mobile phones as many people do this for work.
Remember Branch - https://www.cnbc.com/id/47736408 - a LinkedIn killer startup based on Facebook graph?
Like a lot of education, California's is so tied up in so many ways that it takes books to understand.

The first issue that springs to mind is the funding. Most funds in California do not stay local, they go to Sacramento and are then distributed out. If you're thinking that is a system ripe for abuse, then you are correct. The formulas and methods for determining funding aren't easy to grok. But then you add in all the fraud from schools themselves and you get a real mess.

Further, Prop 13's starvation of property taxes has also contributed to the lack of public school funding in California. It's a bit of a winding tale there, but suffice to say, less taxes means less good schools. Then again, Prop 13 is, just, hoo boy. What a total long standing mess.

So, does California need better education. Oh heck yes. But fixing that requires dealing with things like Prop 13 and other huge political monsters barely hidden under the rug. Try finding any politician with the bravery, let alone stamina, to fix those titanic underlying issues (pun intended).
The "secret sauce" in this is machine learning. Couldn't you also use that to do the post processing currently required on green screen footage?
It’s really disturbing for me the possibility that a that a hardware vendor could enforce that on court.

Does someone knows what’s the rationale for that from Nvidia?
It’s API calls not their user chat portal. You can’t access the stored data, they say they keep it around for 30 days in case of abuse so they can refer back to it to verify and take action.
NPE was created in 2017.
Facebook had "Labs" in 2011-12.
The same idea keeps showing up again and again every few years thanks to a hugely profitable ads business.
Is it possible that the missing 2% isn't something from this world and is unknown? :)
Related: https://twitter.com/cperciva/status/1659059445685420032/phot...

Progress on speeding up the FreeBSD boot over the years:

FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE on EC2: 28208 ms.
FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE on EC2: 9698 ms.
FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT on Firecracker: 620 ms.
>As someone who actually worked in construction (excavation in my case):

I dont think we could tackle construction as a whole. But if "Tech" ( Not just Software ) could help with all the smaller things. Like somehow make excavation 10-20x faster and cheaper.
With those shows narratives heavily influencing how we think. With some no longer available after falling through the cracks of DRM (like Malcolm in the Middle in some countries).
> What a wild thread. Author claims to be in they mid 30s, then says they wrote JS since the 90s (back when they were what, less than 10 years old?)

I am the author. You are correct I wrote JS since the 90s, however your math is incorrect as I was 12 in '96 (but less than 10 when using my first language, AppleSoft BASIC)

> uses LinkedIn connections with lawyers to make a point

And the point you are making is..?
Using startx in Guix SD
Google's Privacy Policy Now Admits to Collecting All Your Data for AI Training
I am one of the authors, there is no API used...
My better half doesn't like when I refer to us as "roomies with kids", but that's just because we're at that point in our lives when we're so busy with work and kid activities that we can go a few days without having any time for each other.

We discuss this though. We know and acknowledge that this is just the situation, and it won't last forever (we'll both die eventually). :)
Taking the long term view solar panels of some sort seem like the energy technology pattern that will dominate the Earth's antropocene period.

Other patterns (wind, hydro, geothermal etc) feel clumsy, high maintainance and localized. Tapping secondary feeds rather than the universal primary feed.

For sure, solar panel efficiency, total environmental impact, economic costs of manufacturing and recycling, storage etc are all relevant dimensions. They see much attention and, inevitably, innovation.

In the scheme of things the fossil fuel binge will be but a blip, succeeded by a long period where humanityp enters its solar powered phase.
These suggestions of "pay for results" have a complicated history. I suggest anyone interested actually search the literature on it.

Ever since I saw the critique of the 2012 NYC value added measure results, which shows VAM scores uncorrelated between different classrooms of the same teacher [4], I have been very skeptical that any kind of incentive pay will work. (Also, this NYT article is pretty damning considering the source. [3])

The question is not whether VAM can work, it is a question of does a particular implementation work. The paper [1] is a classic (search for it).

In this particular case: the exact method is not clear but it sounds like there is no adjustment for prior achievement, so all teachers of advanced classes will automatically get the bonus? What if instead what is being measured is the change from year to year? Same result: in this case history is an excellent predictor of the future.

[1]: Rothstein, Jesse. “Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 125, no. 1, February 2010, pp. 175–214.

[2]: Methodological issues in value-added modeling. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11092-019-09303-w

[3]: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/education/teacher-quality... (paywall)

[4]: https://garyrubinstein.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/analyzing-re... (Found it!!)
On your email!

Apologies for the delay!

I'm all out of codes now - If I get anymore, I'll share them here.

I didnt realise at first there were so many requests! :-)
The HTTP status code for a web server's default “hello” front page
The biggest problem domain worth pursuing is figuring out fusion. If we can unlock what is effectively limitless power a lot of problems become far more tractable. Everything else is a distraction. We need cheaper and more available power.

Every physicist and engineer in the world should probably try dedicating at least one or two month of their life to figuring out fusion.

If humanity could pay a trillion dollars to instantly unlock fusion it would still be considered a bargain. And yet we don't treat research into that field as something with such a potentially massive impact.
So what do we do with the billions who can't pay? They should stay offline until they can? I know I can pay now, but when I was starting out, I couldn't
Any development, no matter how mundane, will eventually be turned to use by a military or paramilitary group somewhere at some point.

From this it can actually be argued anything developed is developed to eventually be used for warfare....
Perl / Unix One-Liner Cage Match
Reducing propaganda and breaking-up banking.
> No. It's like saying 'Boston in uncharted history as Boston breaks snowfall record since last winter'.

... And yet you take issue with me calling it a straw-man argument ...

We know that this is the hottest global temperature since the civilization arose, and most likely quite a bit before that. It's even explained in TFA:

> While the records are based on data that only goes back to the mid-20th century, they are “almost certainly” the warmest the planet has seen over a much longer time period – “probably going back at least 100,000 years,” ...
Nadia: The Secret of Blue Water is one of my all time favorite anime. While I think that many criticisms of the island arc are valid, I don't think it should detract anyone from watching it from start to finish and I wouldn't recommend skipping it, either.

While I'm happy that someone went to the trouble of recreating a different cut of the show based on official work, I don't know that it's really even necessary, just as I rarely find those sorts of efforts (which happen somewhat frequently in anime, where they condense tv shows into movies) to be very good.
I got downvoted because I guess "experiment" was too loose of a term. Indeed, I mean being able to modify the system to suit you. Go, instead, is a system that molds you in it's image. Which is why I believe it's the next iteration of Java and not something like C or C++. It's just simply not "open" enough to create a novelty that enhances it in a way that Google approves of.
Xanax/benzos are the most effective psych medicine, deserve to be over the counter, but can be fatally overdosed. All mental drugs and others such as chemotherapy need to be precisely targeted at limited part of an organ.

2030 4 high-NA EUV fabs will have 1.4 nano RiscV chips; rollable microLED; solid state battery. That's still not paper thin all day phones.

1 passenger, only autopilot drones should transport snakebite victims in dangerous countries.
There's also a great game that walks through a bunch of these concepts and ends up with a working computer starting from gates.

https://turingcomplete.game/
If types were added to javascript it could also dramatically improve the performance of javascript virtual machines (V8 and friends). It seems so silly to me that I write typescript, then the types are erased from my code, sent to the browser, and then the browser tries to infer them as part of its own optimization process.

Adding types to javascript proper would be fantastic.
There is a better, older, phrase that would be great to promote over that tired saying:

“Those who know, do. Those that understand, teach.”
— Aristotle
Looks cool, but writing "pay for what you need" and no pricing info on the page is really off-putting.
When I was a kid in the 90s my parents took me to some sort of art gallery hidden upstairs above other shops, that was doing a hologram exhibition (wavefront holograms, not specular ones like in this article). It was dark inside and they had a whole lot of amazing large format holograms of various things lit up.

I kind of wonder why holograms of all types aren't more popular. It's still amazing to see a 3D image on a 2D plane that you can look at from different angles.
You’ve conveniently ignored the fact that the average driver in 2023 (without any help from a driver assistance system) is severely distracted. Surpassing the level of attention and responsiveness of an average driver is a very low bar right now.

Also, your focus on the time given to take over before a collision makes little sense. If the vehicle senses a dangerous situation, it doesn’t just throw up its hands and disengage - it’s going to attempt to stop or maneuver out of the way of danger the same way a human would, and people don’t demonstrate a lot of skill or success in those situations either.
Airway reflux as a cause of respiratory disease
I wouldn't call myself a bottom tier dev. I've done plenty of Go programming in a corporate-ish environment. It's restrictive, which is nice, because the ceiling for expert is basically on the floor. It's the Ruby on Rails of programming languages. A perfect walled garden, lead by a benevolent dictator (Google), who will guide us all to the promised land.

Would I recommend Go to someone as a first language? Absolutely not. Would I professionally recommend Go to a company in order to lower the skill ceiling to floor, keep seniors+ in check, and keep juniors safe? Yes. That is all it is good at. Everything else it offers another language does better.

I have about a decade and a half of experience as a software engineer. In almost every case, over a long enough time period, a centrally dictated constrained system is almost never ideal. I've ported more companies off Ruby on Rails onto something sensible than I can keep count of. I imagine I will be able to charge $150/hr to do that for companies who bought into Go in about 10 years as well. Once you need to reach outside that box to do a very bespoke task your company needs you're stuck. With RoR I found this to be the case with ActiveRecord. With Golang I imagine it'll either be the concurrency model or the stiff parameters for nearly every aspect of the language. My present company is already at that stage. Their answer was to build around it. So now we have a hodge-podge of tooling in a couple languages and all benefits of a centrally governed language have gone out the window.

These days I generally recommend most people run Python as it seems the most future proof. I've also recommended a few companies move back to Java due to constraints Python could not solve for.
A proper proposal would be a lot more words than my little posting!

It doesn't have to be perfect. It just has to be significantly better than the existing system, which has zero incentive for the teachers to get results.
This is a recipe for an ignorant underclass from which one can never escape. What is a bright kid supposed to do when their parents have a third grade education? Functioning public school is supposed to solve that problem.
I think we tried that in the form of scholarships. Basically, the students with the highest grades get discounts from different colleges. It's not exactly the same, but the effect is similar, and this system has been running for generations.

I think one big problem is that low test scores are highly correlated to poverty. Parents who earn less usually don't have time to help kids with their school work, or don't understand the school work, or don't know how to study or teach children. Sure, there's exceptions to this everywhere, but that's the general pattern.

Incidentally, Louisiana has/had a program called TOPs that covers in-state tuition for students that get over a 3.something GPA. Who benefits the most from it? Kids whose families make above the median income in the state.

I don't think giving X dollars to the families with the top ranking students would change society overnight.
Oracle RDBMS is available for aarch64
Scroll down for Enterpise Edition downloads, it's there.
The wallet ID and public, immutable transaction logs still allows for entity resolution. There is, of course, a limit to the entity resolution that can be thus performed... much like there is with Web2 advertisers. In fact, it is the same limit. That limit is the ability of the user to prevent the system from resolving their identity based on their activities within the system. I'd dare say that it's probably even easier to dodge ER today than it would be in some hypothetical mega-dystopia where literally any blockchain is the default currency paradigm.
> I can’t do any deep transformative work when the fire is raging. We need preventative care. If people come in when something is starting to be an issue between them instead of when they’re at a breaking point, I’d love that. Because then, in two or three sessions, you can be good to go—see you later!

This is the actual key insight in the article, not smartphone abuse. There's still a stigma around seeing a therapist: you don't need to see a therapist unless you have a problem, so seeing a therapist is evidence that you have a problem, and it's embarrassing to be someone who has a problem, so you avoid it until you have the emotional equivalent of stage 4 cancer, and then it's much more difficult to treat, takes much more time, and might not even be successfully treated (i.e. divorce). But if you go in for a regular checkup, to review your disagreements (which you will certainly have, since you're not a clone of your partner) and how you're communicating and compromising, then you're much more likely to stay in a healthy place with your partner.

It's not the smartphone that's breaking couples up, it's their unwillingness to ask for help until it's too late.
They don't let you know this, but you can just delete your "I read this later" backlog. You're not going to finish it, or read any of it.
I really appreciate this work. I realized how important it is the other day when I needed a text editor on my phone and realized how opaque the Play store is, it's hard to find an app you can trust not to hoover your data.

Either you give a closed source app access to your files, or it saves your notes to it's cloud. Even apps that are open source aren't transparent as they haven't necessarily uploaded the version in github. So it all falls apart and you're back to plain old trust so long as you use the app stores.
Companies wouldn't use it pervasively if it didn't work.
I left the same company after 5+ years ( 6 years ago ) with a few goals -

1. Spend time with family ( parents )

2. Work on a side project

3. Travel

4. New language ( Spanish )

5. Learn something new ( tech and non tech )

I am very happy with 1,3,4,5. ( ongoing )

Regarding 2, I worked on making a no code platform for Voice apps and had a working demo/app but the market was just not ready and it still is not … Next I tried making some simple web apps - but no success financially. I keep on experimenting with technology so I still love my current state of affairs.

My personal learnings/experience (also from YC Startup School online ) is that you need to have some form of demand/audience before building the product for the consumer space. My friends in the Enterprise space seem to have much better luck.

PS: The fruit company is pretty strict about moon lighting (speaking from experience of a very good friend ) so just be careful about that aspect if they find that out while you are employed. I left in positive terms, in-fact a week back my boss mentioned to let them know when I am done with everything and would like to be back.
A decent split keyboard with Bluetooth would be a great hardware project, similarly a nice trackball.

Building a quadcopter might also be nice.

A one/two wheeled selfbalancing robot.

A lawnmower robot that doesn’t maim small animals like hedgehogs.

A small submarine or sailboat with remote control.
Companies fix it or they go out of business. I've seen them tweaking it.
somebody's grump they couldn't con another sucker into the grift industry :'(
You are correct in this assesment. A majority of individuals and startups playing around with turning LLMs into products aim to be prepared for the arrival of the subsequent generation of models. When that occurs, they'll already have a product or company in place and can simply integrate the new models.

Models are getting commoditized, well executed ideas are not.
Can you provide a source for how this consumption is being measured?
At a former team, we went from spending quite a bit of time on code style comments and disagreements to spending no time at all on it, with the simple act of making the code linter a breaking step in our CI build, and deciding no review will start until the build is green.

We had to adjust our linter settings here and there - but it was still super efficient for everyone's time compared to what we had before...

I can't recommend this more.
Universal basic services. Food, clothing, shelter, education, safety, healthcare.
Is fusion really that great? Decades of research and billions of dollars later it's still not commercially feasible.

Whereas solar power is cheaper than coal now.
Also on the horizon is thorium reactors.
Yes, exactly this, I also want to say I'm not someone who generally thinks open models are better. I think embeddings just haven't been a focus for OpenAI and it shows. Maybe in the future they will focus on it
Computationally optimal sequences of barbell plates
Show HN: Build a single source of truth for your React App
Daxus is a server state management package that make developer have full control over their data such that they can build a single source of truth by themselves.
While there are many possible answers, it eventually boils down to Unix being a C runtime and thus has a C culture. Lisp is from outside of this section of the world, so it simply had less adoption and support inside Unix land. Other languages, like sed, awk, and shell are not C but share its heritage(essentially, they were made by people close to the making of C.)
My office is everywhere there is an Internet connection.
I like to pre-allocate a &str buffer at launch, then create &str variables pointing into that buffer. I separate them with 0x00 bytes so I don’t have to store an extra size counter or invent a new data type.
yet another example of Lindy effect.
I've been using Thinkpad T40s since 2019.
Mastodon Servers That Have Blocked Threads.net
> If you don't own the restaurant you're working at, chances are you're being exploited (or this is a small restaurant were you only heat already prepared food).

It’s hard to make money as a restaurant owner. Margins tend to be around 3-5% You have inventory that rots, rent, and overworked staff you can barely pay or keep. It’s so brutal that even some Michelin rated restaurants have to rely on donations from rich patrons and other sources of revenue like cook books and cooking classes.

Even if you love cooking and food, that’s one of the last industries you’d want to join either as an owner or employee unless you’re masochistic
Yeah, there better be jail time for the top offenders. We've just seen Berejiklian get off despite "serious corrupt conduct" in NSW.

What's the point of having anti-corruption watchdogs if they have no teeth?
Yes. You need a clear focus and direction. Although a 3-6 months break is more than enough to find out if you want to start a company or just want “more” free time to experiment with technology ideas. I think I am more in the second camp.
Twitter is not alone. Almost all major trends right now are on control & exploitation, are on closing off & taking over.

I think Meta made threads because they recognized an existing undercurrent by the alpha geeks that's been active & thriving & growing since 2017. Meta realized they could be relevant if they didn't control it all. They realized the Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace was already nuclear bombed by many nations, in anger, and opted to try find some place to go where the puck was moving.

This looks like a big Twitter related drama in the micro. But this is just the only space afforded by the macro, and everyone else is too stupid, too sluggish, too resistant, or too dumb to start adapting at all rationally. Threads is the only tech titan with even 1/4 a brain, & everyone else is going to get devoured by the child government would-be angry new gods of the world.