skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Part 1: Why and how we chose to migrate from Ember to React
The NES isn't that old. 1985-1993 was when it being produced in the U.S. SNES was 1991 through 1996 or 1997. I bet both systems' Japanese counterparts were produced at least twice as long.

Entities that produced the games and likely were assigned the copyright are game companies, which should be trackable, and in some cases, still exist (like Capcom or Konami). You might have problems hunting down copyright owners for unlicensed games like the Wisdom Tree games, but those all sucked anyway.

It's not like an 8-bit computer platform where individuals produced a lot of content and are hard to find.
He had no science degree but his Ontario Science Centre exhibits changed museums
What does "go omad automatically" mean?
> Of course, since '46 capitalism has demanded women enter the workforce to compete with men and drive down wages.

That is your words and is a weird way to frame women working.
Click through

Look for screenshot

Don't find

Close tab
Same.
In my experience about 1 in 5 has been some help to the team (the rest hinder or contribute neutrally), but even they have an easier/less stressful job and work far less hours and apply far less mental bandwidth to each task. I'm convinced becoming a manager should mean a pay cut.
This. So much this. And also https://xkcd.com/1240/
Free markets => prosperity is absolutely not true and the consensus view of economic historians moved on from this idea in the 60s.

In the period 1950-2000, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and China all achieved their economic miracles through heavy government intervention in markets to build new industrial capacity, what is sometimes called state capitalism. in the period 1930-1950, Germany, the USSR and the US did the same in rising out of the Great Depression through national mobilization before and during WW2. And well before that, Britain became the world's economic leader in the 19th century in part through state capitalist practices that began in the 18th (e.g. the British East India company) - the British parliament was arguably the most actively interventionist state apparatus in Europe at this time. Many have also argued that Silicon Valley itself emerged from state capitalist actions by the US in its technological and industrial competition with the USSR from 1950-1990.

Free markets certainly have an important role to play, but they usually work best after the heavy lifting has been done by huge investments and interventions on the part of government to create fertile ground for entrepreneurs. That is, the government invests heavily to kick start development, creates a legal framework in which smaller scale enterprises can contribute and reap rewards for themselves, then steps back to allow the market to do its work, adding regulation as needed to keep it running smoothly.
> At this point I had a home.nix that spanned a couple of thousand lines. This is a bad idea, mostly because it's hard to manage.

This has also been my experience with home-manager. The promise is great - it's like DLC for Nix that just Does More™. Then you get into it, and realize the modules are a lot more fragile and most of them are outdated. Then you're a few hundred lines in with workarounds, DBUS declarations and all sorts of declarative ricing and go "is it worth it?".

Since then I just removed all the home-manager stuff and relied on NixOS' native config. Things are much more stable and easier to define, and I haven't found a whole lot of things that are truly undoable without it. It's slower and non-declarative, sure, but my sanity is all the better for it. I hope I'm not the only one out there.
Shit like this is how you burn customers and then they find out you aren't changing the sheets, they change hotels.

Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
The problem is that it doesn't act like a mass distribution, it acts as two non spatially overlapping possibilities. I think that the only way to save classical gravity would be superdeterminism. If quantum states correspond to anything other than our ignorance, i.e. if superposition states are actual physical states of reality, then gravity will need to be quantum.
The timing of this is hilarious: https://twitter.com/chatsidhartha/status/1649484240952721408

Oracle just sent a legal threat to "Rust for Javascript" to remove "Javascript" from their name. (Oracle owns the "Javascript" trademark.)
Hmmm... I was thinking you could limit based on the unique identifierForVendor[1], but without a way to verify that a given id is legit this would be easily circumvented. An API whereby Apple cryptographically signs a vendor/device-specific ID so you can effectively rate limit without needing any personal info whatsoever would be nice.

1: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uidevice/162...
You don’t. My point is: After drawing, the canvas is “inert”. Rendering to the canvas once is probably more or less as expensive as rendering the SVG once. However, the SVG will probably be rendered a lot more than once. The page developer cannot control it either, the browser decides what’s best.
Shut and calculate is putting your head in the sand and avoiding that physics should be telling us what the world is. You’re wrong about MWI in that it’s a more elegant interpretation because it adds nothing extra to the wave equation and treats the universe as fundamentally quantum with no arbitrary dividing lines for classically scaled objects.
If they are close enough to each other and far enough from everything else, then why not.

The smallest objects for which we measured their gravitational interaction weighed just 90 mg (https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/03/researchers-measure-...).

The biggest object put in quantum superposition weighed around 1 mcg (https://physics.aps.org/articles/v16/s45).
"Beautiful Iconography" <4 icons that all have the same silhouette>
Lisp stat landing page basically sounds like Julia, except they “kept” the syntax and it can compile.

I don’t know how mature it is, but it’s sale pitch really speaks to me.

https://lisp-stat.dev/
Global Wind Atlas
agree, but agree with another reply that it doesn't even seem like technical competency is the skill used outside of potentially engineering. feels like optimizing for "managing up" (which is code for "making people above you happy" and doesn't necessarily correlate with delivering any type of value) is what these managers do. in other R&D roles (design, product) most managers i've met aren't actually gifted at executing in an IC context
> I get that people pretend they are afraid some nefarious program is going to scrape their screen, but since I don't use closed source software this just isn't a real worry.

Do you personally audit the source code to every piece of software you run on your computer? Do you have the expertise necessary to even do that if you wanted to?

FOSS isn't magically immune to security exploits. Everything we build should assume any other software it interfaces with might be defective or even hostile.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbleed
This is why bodyweight or lower weight squats like goblet are safer. Failure with bodyweight squat doesnt put you out two months. Very easy to add too much weight in the squat rack. Asking beginners to know good form on day 1 squatting means they need a trainer.
Can throughly recommend these.. Currently running one of these with 4x4TB and it’s lovely, as long as your Chipset supports PCI-E bifurcation..
Comparing to other industries is unlikely to be useful, because many craftspeople do own their tools and bring them job to job. Who owns the tools will depend on the specific tools and needs of a job.
On complex systems, it is very hard to draw the line between willingly missing out critial issues and sincerely doing so.

Basically, it will end up that any non-permanently audited assembly written software by possibly anybody (that would make open source mandatory by law), and non-permanently audited hardware (that would make VHDL/Verilog open source mandatory by law) would become illegal.
All the emulators, etc., work has had its merits, both for cultural preservation effects and for the hacker-y craft achievement, but...

Business-wise, had that bootleg environment not happened, I suspect someone could've made a killing by re-releasing vintage games on current devices.

Now I suspect most of the nostalgia/familiarity demand is satisfied, and won't return even if you were able to delete every existing emulator, unlicensed ROM image and AV assets, etc.
Actual search or autofill segment?

Autofill segment would be really useful, and no modern thing seem to be able to do it. But tab to search doesn't look very useful to me.
I once ordered something, because I wanted it, but then the vendor immediately signed me up for their shitty mailing list without asking. This upset me so much that I immediately cancelled the order.

They decided to ignore my cancellation and ship me the thing anyways. Now we're in a pitched battle over who should pay to fix their mistake. Regardless of the outcome, I'm never going to buy anything from them again.
I don't know about other folks here, but in the past decade, we've encountered recruiters who present one candidate when doing a telephone interview and then a different person shows up for the in-person interview.
Both $100 and $1000: Way back in the dial up days, there used to be companies that paid you by the hour to run an always-on-top ad bar on your computer while you browsed the web. I wrote a simple little program in Visual Basic to move the mouse, browse sites, and click links. Wrote another program to reload the adbar if it stalled or crashed.

I started to give friends and family a 60/40 split to run my setup on their computers. This also paid referral bonuses on my account.

Ended up making 3 or 4k in total but at that age, I might as well have been Zuck. The internet used to be so much cooler when it was the wild west.
The biggest reason I separate work and personal devices is that I do not want my personal devices subject to discovery if my employer is involved in a lawsuit. I can't stress this enough- if my employer is sued, I don't want the opposing law firm to get copies of my data.

The second reason is that I don't want my personal devices subject to security monitoring, and most companies that at least pretend to care about security require some level of endpoint monitoring.
Called the cops, described gunman and weapon, replaced the watch he got. Continued to walk late at night, tried to woolgather less.
Books too. The vast majority of books (or paper media overall) ever printed are no longer available new. There _might_ be some electronic version, but realistically not. Library systems help fill this in, but there are so many titles are are simply difficult to obtain.
Fun fact: Bigfoot has no gravity because he doesn't exist in this slice of the multiverse.
I watched it a long time ago. I just put it here because it presents the idea visually, not because I support or even understand it :)
Even if the read speeds are limited by the drive interface, for a NAS, 100Mb/s decent for the most common denominating factor - a gigabit link.
Can the boreal forest be used to fight climate change?
Is the fact that static methods in Java need to be namespaced to a class really anything to even worry about? Like, whats even a single issue with it?
Ah makes way more sense.
> Base 3 wouldn’t work in that sense.

That's true, but a) not the point I am making, and b) I am pretty sure it says nowhere in my post that it would.
It could also be that I make a game, then a somewhat similar sequal, and I only want to sell the sequel. What right as a consumer do you have to distribute the first one for free then?
>Airplanes are also inspired by how birds work, but (presumably) you don't think that bird laws should apply to airplanes.

Not really. Only if if talking an ornithopter. Otherwise they're based off Bernolli's equations.

>You are confused. Neural networks are inspired by how brains work, but they do not actually simulate brains.

Non-sequitur. They never claimed it was simulating a human brain, merely that it was engaging in an analogus process of information encoding/decoding.
Isn't this similar to the view of Penrose?
Is Jack Sweeney just manually posting these? As far as I could find, Threads does not yet have a public API.
You could just have a land tax, as copyright is land.

Let companies value their copyright, and let them pay the cost to maintain that copyright (say a 2% per year cost), and let someone buy that copyright from them at the price they value it at.
Does Zuckerberg fly in a private jet frequently or at all?
Archiving Null-Ls
Benchmarking session recording's impact on performance
Thunderbird downloads local copies. A lot of email clients do that actually.
No backups??
I've been doing this on Brave for years.

https://itsbehnam.com/Brave-Hacks-I-Create-my-Own-Custom-Sea...
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Alima-vm%2Flima%20qemu&typ...

It's a wrapper that interfaces with QEMU in the background to make things nicer/easier in case anybody was wondering
For stuff that works “no”, for products where the business plan is “me too”, I think “yes”.

A key differentiator is making large evaluation data sets that prove that it works. Many hustlers are way too lazy to do that.
I am not a lawyer but take your word for it. Is it illegal specifically in US, or elsewhere too?

Either way, you'd surely agree its a noble pursuit? Just considering the wider context here!
Unfortunately the Disney vault works exactly this way. Generate pent up demand by refusing to sell a product, which is exactly how copyright works for them.

I however agree with you and have no moral concerns if a company doesn't want to sell me a product.
Wait I thought you mean they ask questions of a high-school difficulty level. You mean they wanted to see your actual high school grades?!?
Deref for Vec<T> and String is fine because they are owning containers that decay to their "view" types (slices). Strings and vectors own memory, while views borrow it and can be used to operate on them without reallocating or moving the container itself, treating it as a contiguous list of values. A similar relationship exists between C++'s `std::string` and `std::string_view`, and `std::vector` and `std::span`.

IMHO there the logic behind that is very clear and makes a lot of sense. I think it's natural that view-related traits (the ones who operate on the elements of a contiguous area of memory) should be associated with slices, while memory-related ones (the ones that operate on an owning container) should be implemented on the owning types. If you mix them up, you are bound to mess up first and foremost because _it is not logically sound_. You don't need to own a string in order to check if all of its ASCII characters are all caps, for instance, because it's an operation that's also valid on any array of bytes, without the whole concept of "owning memory".
Wellesley College is a well known women's only college. Hillary Clinton went there, and it's still women only today (although they have partnerships with nearby schools like Harvard and MIT and Boston College for the women to take classes there if they want (and experience classes with mixed genders)).

They also have planned social activities with those nearby mixed gender colleges.

(My friend went there and told me all of this, and I assume it's still the case even though it's been 25 years :) ).
This is just your run of the mill STEM looking down upon other fields argument. There is rampant fraud in STEM. If anything it's harded to detect because the people who do it are better informed on how to hide it.
I'm not certain, but looking at that site it appears that the 2nd edition is the R version, whereas there is only one edition of the Python version.
Yeah, that's what I meant. I wonder if it is even legal to work two jobs as an employee paid by the hour at the same time. Sounds like that might be fraud.
There is an increasingly prevalent view among the "freshman profundity" set that if you've arrived at any view that is counter to theirs, then it's because you oppose their political or moral value system. However, a good understanding of the world rarely yield beliefs that cohere with the kind of convenient, value-oriented rhetorical slogans that people get self-righteous over online.
I work in Contracting, so YMMV.

For me, I have a separate laptop for every contract I work on, sometimes more than one for a given contract (for complicated compliance reasons). The reason for this is to a) prevent cross-contamination between projects, and b) because the laptops could get caught up in legal shenanigans. If one contract ends up in dispute, the laptop could end up getting subpoenaed, and if it was my only laptop I would be SOL. Or god forbid, code from two projects gets mixed by accident, and now I'm in violations of multiple NDAs. In one case, the customer paid for my hardware during development, and when we were done they took ownership of the laptops along with the code.

Your work computer is just like your work code: At the end of the day it's not really yours, don't get attached.
You don't need an E4. A cheap smartphone attachment is fine.
Is it usual to go through all rounds of an interview process without getting a salary range and asking if they sponsor visas and pay for relocation? These are round one questions for me and I assumed everyone else.
A spreadsheet with numerous sparklines per row would get you there.
The funny thing is that Xenix was a Microsoft product. They originally licensed it to SCO who created the x86 port, then eventually sold it entirely to SCO in 1987.

If things had turned out slightly differently, Microsoft's 32-bit OS in the 1990s would have been Unix.
> Unlike movies, where you simply need a method to playback a video and audio stream, getting interactive media to continue working isn't trivial, especially since it needs to run exactly as it did before (otherwise what's the point).

Even getting a 20-year-old console (which in the retro gaming world isn't that old) to work with a modern HDMI TV is a headache!

Despite owning the hardware and plenty of games, I had to drop a couple hundred bucks on a RetroTINK scaler to make my PS2 playable again. Which is no hate to the RetroTINK, because it's an amazing little gadget (and its output looks great), just kind of sad that it takes so much money and effort to keep playing a console I've owned since I was a kid.
Squatters rights for IP
This prompted me to find out that MediEvil (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediEvil) has a remaster ... nostalgia incoming
> Oracle has been a remarkably good steward of Java

Well, other than ramming through modules and the --add-opens fiasco from Java 9.
Maybe Zuckerberg gave him early access after Elon called him (Zuckerberg) a cuck on Twitter.
While this is a very welcome improvement in terms of functionality, I can't help by feel that the re-use of "restartPolicy" to mean something similar, but different, when used in a different context, is a very poor decision.

Kubernetes already has an issue with having a (perceived) high barrier to entry, and I'm not sure that "restartPolicy on a container means this, unless isn't used in this list of containers, in which case it means this".

I would have preferred to see a separate attribute (such as `sidecar: true`), rather than overloading (and in my opinion, abusing) the existing `restartPolicy`.
That's absurd. I am not answering questions about high school or college, especially to that degree. I am a decade into my career at this point. I would turn this into a "creative writing" exercise.
The question of how can the Equivalence Principle work in the presence of gravitons comes up surprisingly often!

You will enjoy this discussion https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/589074/why-can-t...

They go over several reasons why gravitons don't break the equivalence principle. In particular the answer about virtual particles is very important.
LXD is great tech and a pleasure to work with. This blows. Hopefully an actually open alternative pops up.

Canonical's general bad attitude towards FOSS is just appalling.
>> What do these people actually do? They go to meetings.

This is the biggest problem in industry: pointless meetings with no agenda and no action items. There is a watershed moment for anyone however. Once your calendar is even 40% filled (particularly if meetings are randomly distributed), flow state is pretty hard to achieve. Therefore one is better off to book even more meetings so everyone knows that you can't possibly do any actual work. Then your day is naturally completely void of meaning but you simply clock in at 9am and out at 4pm. Once the day ends you don't have to think about work at all since your work literally is meetings.

If you want to have a pointless meeting, be sure to book it in the evening or weekend so that you pay the same price as people that are actually doing real work.
Sabine Hossenfelder apparently does this [1, 2] for $50/20min.

[1] http://backreaction.blogspot.com/p/talk-to-physicist_27.html

[2] https://aeon.co/ideas/what-i-learned-as-a-hired-consultant-f...
Would be cool if we see something come out that uses the Apple native Virtualization.framework so you can use the nested Rosetta extensions on M1. Dunno if that's been done yet.
The question is missing the point the parent is making. Parent is saying that the purpose of IP is to, in the long run, benefit society. As a result, we have collectively agreed ( for various definitions of agreed -- I certainly think they are way too long ) that protecting author's works for a period of time is desirable. As such, after some time has passed, why does it not end up in the same category as old published books ( public domain )?
You could use someone else's computer or maybe you have bought one 2nd handand never agreed to any EULA.
> Information wants to be free. I can't believe I have to say this on a site like this.

This is a tech-startup website that exists to monetize SV-style start-ups. The whole point is to make as much money as possible, and any FOSS love is wholly incidental.
That's what I like about it. It sounds like a startup calling out a bigger competitor for anti-competitive behavior. (Ironic that it's coming from Oracle, but that's also what gives it some teeth!)
If the sequel isn't compelling it won't sell. It's a bad game series that relies on the first one being unavailable to sell the second.
Compositions of blocks of state may not end up with a more reliable software. Each of state management are controlled by independent processes that may interact with each other (example: horizontal pod autoscalers are not directly aware of cluster-autoscaler). The whole system is more like an ecology or a complex adaptive system than it is something you can reason directly with abstractions.

In the Cynefin framework (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin_framework), you can reason through "complicated" domains the way you are suggesting, but it will not work when working in the "complex" domain. And I think what Kubernetes help manage is in "complex" not "complicated" domain.
Because there is still a stigma to it and there are still many men who hide that part of their identity (and women too). And also because being gay obviously isn't the only reason men stay single.
A fan, the author of Petalisp is https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=heisig
Everyone is likely better off, but not everyone is vastly better off. Some people are likely a bit better off economically but way worse off socially (since the dating market is much more "efficient" and competitive than it was in 1946, which will be a win for some, and a major loss for others).

And some people's/professions economic potential peaked in the early 1970s (truckers, for example, and some other blue collar jobs)
Ubuntu to enact new marketing strategy: “Stay quiet and watch Red Hat implode”
That's a non-sequitur. I do multiple warmup sets. Typically one for each pair of plates.