skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No. Psychology is the worst. It is encouraging that an insurgent group is taking replication on but it feels like only about 20% of the field.

Some results do replicate. Big Five personality traits, general classification of mental illness, mainstream IQ results, and human perception and performance. All psychology is not false and there are interesting things to learn from the field.

But the severity and frequency of fraud and non replication is worst in psychology. So much so that half of what you learned in Psych 101 ten years ago does not replicate.

The big challenge for the field is that humans know a lot of psychology. We can track our own thoughts and we are constantly interacting with people and trying to understand their psychology. A biologist who studies ants intensely for 5 years is maybe only one of 100 people have ever watched them that carefully. They'll find lots of new stuff.

Psychology doesn't have powerful techniques than that for determining new truths about humans. It's still mostly give a questionnaire or put people in weird situations.

So there are a lot of researchers hunting around for original ideas that are undiscoverable with our current tech. Some of them are bound to give into the temptation to just make up an interesting result with manufactured data. With p hacking they might not even be committing fraud, they are desperate for a positive result, when the get one they stop looking and publish.

So I would still guess in 2023 that about 80% of "new" discoveries published in journals won't replicate. That rises to 95% with journal publications that are published as university pr and reported in the media.

For coverage of what to remember to unlearn Rolf Degen is great: https://twitter.com/DegenRolf

Popular examples that do not replicate (mostly from Rolf):

Repressed childhood memories
Social media harms
Search bubbles and echo chambers
Women prefer masculine men when fertile
Priming (you see a fight in the hallway and then don't cooperate later)
Power posing (puff out your chest to feel more confident)
Watching eyes make people more honest (in Kahneman and Malcolm Gladwell)

Notice that a lot of these are interesting, and you want them to be true. That's not enough to make it so.

As a bonus, an interesting interview with Daniel Kahneman: https://www.edge.org/adversarial-collaboration-daniel-kahnem...
Not to cherry pick but here are a handful of "red state cities" to compare too. Most have worse violent crime and much better property crime which aligns with my experience where leaving a stick of gum in your car was an invitation to get your car window broken.

* https://www.bestplaces.net/compare-cities/dallas_tx/san_francisco_ca/crime
* https://www.bestplaces.net/compare-cities/houston_tx/san_francisco_ca/crime
* https://www.bestplaces.net/compare-cities/miami_fl/san_francisco_ca/crime
* https://www.bestplaces.net/compare-cities/minneapolis_mn/san_francisco_ca/crime
* https://www.bestplaces.net/compare-cities/wilmington_nc/san_francisco_ca/crime

Also used this to pick a few cities with similar size: https://mapfight.xyz/map/san.francisco/

(edit: fix bullets)
Putting it here, as it seems relevant.

Veritasium: Parallel World Probably Exist: Here's Why

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTXTPe3wahc
Which (even to the extent it was true—it wasn't, always) doesn't change the fact that their goals and incentives weren't the same as those of modern professional law enforcement.
>frequently find titles unavailable for loan of any kind

Even through interlibrary loan?
The best way of making statements for things like this is to disclude any negatives in it.
Don’t include any “cannot”, “never”, “is impossible”, etc because if they are ignored then the statement reverses in meaning.

Instead, describe the action with a word that is negative in and of itself e.g. “Please Delete Everything”.
So instead of “Your account cannot be restored”, it’s “Your account will be (irrevocably) deleted”.

And if a word has a positive affirmation as a substring of the negative affirmation, then avoid using it aswell since it’s a similar principal.
I know these are not the same situation, but this sounds like a different Oracle than the one that owns and manages Java.
I find that's often because classes come with a lot of stuff that is less desirable - mainly inheritance and its assorted complexities.

The other side is that classes aren't the only way to get this sort of encapsulation. The classic example is closures - data inside the closure acts as the encapsulated data, and the returned type of the closure is its public API. ML languages typically use modules in place of classes - the module signature defines the public API, and rather than calling methods, you instead call functions with arguments (not `list.length()` but `length(list)`). But again, that's just syntax - we're keeping the same encapsulation because the module-defined functions are the only ones capable of fiddling with the value's internals. You also see this in Rust, which does use method syntax, but has traits and types that act more like modules than typical classes.

All in all, I don't think anyone's complaining about encapsulation, but rather it's a question of whether typical OOP (with all that that typically includes) is the best form of it.
A good technical writer produces clear and concise text. A 1000 word essay about the company is more of an exercise in creativity (and one might even say an exercise in "brown nosing").
There's an open source project I was briefly involved in called SSVG [1] that renders the SVG as Canvas to speed it up drastically, especially on Chrome. It works as a simple one-line js drop in for many common visualization examples [2].

[1] https://ssvg.io/
[2] https://ssvg.io/examples
> there's no way people will be ok with other people controlling their brain

What do you think advertising and news are?
I've met Stéphane, he's great in person as well. I briefly considered applying to Canonical despite the stories of poor conditions, just to get the chance to work with him. I hope he does well.
First $100: Ads, mainly Google AdSense

First $1,000: Ads, mainly Google AdSense
No problem, this error is not irreversible.
I've been drinking RO water almost exclusively since conception and I'm fine. I eat a SAD(standard American diet) and I get enough minerals from my food.
We will be releasing a desktop app for this. However, it will require internet access.
Generative AI Policy Must Be Precise, Careful, and Practical
Nitpick: it’s not accurate to say that a hypervisor, by definition, runs right on the hardware. Xen (as a type-1 hypervisor) has this property; KVM (as a type-2 hypervisor) does not. It’s important to remember that the single core responsibility of a hypervisor is to divide hardware resources and time between VMs, and this decision-making doesn’t require bare-metal.

For those unfamiliar, the informal distinction between type-1 and type-2 is that type-1 hypervisors are in direct control of the allocation of all resources of the physical computer, while type-2 hypervisors operate as some combination of being “part of” / “running on” a host operating system, which owns and allocates the resources. KVM (for example) gives privileged directions to the Linux kernel and its virtualization kernel module for how to manage VMs, and the kernel then schedules and allocates the appropriate system resources. Yes, the type-2 hypervisor needs kernel-mode primitives for managing VMs, and the kernel runs right on the hardware, but those primitives aren’t making management decisions for the division of hardware resources and time between VMs. The type-2 hypervisor is making those decisions, and the hypervisor is scheduled by the OS like any other user-mode process.
No UX-designed systems in sight, just users having a good experience.
Why would it necessarily require any energy?

Energy is what we have to expend to effect change within a universe. There may be no requirement for energy to split into a branching multiverse.
> we certify Oracle software products on RHEL even though they are built and tested on Oracle Linux only, never on RHEL

Okay, that's honestly really interesting, and that is quite a statement on their compatibility. I guess it saves them money on licensing and also sends a message.
I think people just pick the coolest sounding term. Imagine someone is sharing what they are working on, what’s cooler sounding “I am working on a virtual machine monitor” or “I am working on a hypervisor”. Hypervisor just sounds futuristic and awesome.

It’s like with “isomorphic” code. That just sounds much cooler than “js that runs on the client and the server”.
To the Nitter URL? Not working for me
I made a couple thousand when I was 14 making and selling cheats for online games. I blew most of it on games and computer parts, which were things that as a kid from a poor family I would have never been able to have otherwise.

I’m not proud of the mayhem that my cheats caused, but it was a defining moment in my life - I learned a lot and soon started doing small jobs for various companies, starting a career in software before I was even an adult.
I know ChatGPT responses get downvoted here but I fed it this to help me better understand this:

> is KVM a hypervisor? is it type 1 or type 2? is QEMU a hypervisor, is it type 1 or type 2? if QEMU is using KVM, is QEMU then not a hypervisor in that use case?

Yes, KVM (Kernel-Based Virtual Machine) is indeed a hypervisor. It's a type 1 hypervisor, also known as a "bare metal" hypervisor. This is because KVM directly runs on the host's hardware to control the hardware and to manage guest operating systems. The fact that it's a Linux kernel module that allows the Linux kernel to function as a hypervisor makes it very efficient.

QEMU (Quick Emulator) is a bit more complex. By itself, it is technically a type 2 or "hosted" hypervisor, meaning it runs within a conventional operating system environment. QEMU is a generic, open-source machine emulator and virtualizer that can emulate a variety of hardware types and host a range of guest operating systems.

However, when QEMU is used with KVM, the picture changes somewhat. In this case, KVM provides the hardware virtualization where it allows the host machine to call CPU instructions of full virtualization. Then, QEMU emulates the hardware resources and provides the user interface for the VM, thus allowing for better performance and usability. It's this combination of KVM's hardware acceleration capabilities and QEMU's emulation capabilities that makes them often used together.

In this case, QEMU is not acting purely as a hypervisor; it's providing hardware emulation and user interface for the VMs, while KVM is the part providing the hypervisor functionality. However, we often refer to the combination of "QEMU/KVM" as a unit when talking about this mode of operation.
I'm finding many companies are learning that technical ability and leadership ability are entirely different functions.

I consider myself highly technically competent, but if you asked me to lead a team, delegate, etc., I would crash and burn. I just don't have the interpersonal and communication skills to set expectations.

Could I learn those skills? Oh, certainly. But why? The work doesn't interest me. The more I'd go up the management chain, the more I'd get disconnected from the technical work that I actually find interesting, and my day is spent in bullshit meetings where we'd rehash the same bullshit plans on a weekly basis.
9am on the west coast and it's still at 54%- pretty sure it's broken
I was curious for a summary of what the book suggested. Here is Kagi’s summarizer:

- Emotional maturity and stability are key traits for a happy marriage. People who are well-adjusted, have good self-confidence, and can handle problems well tend to have more successful marriages.

- Communication and companionship are vital for a happy marriage. Couples need to develop a strong bond through sharing interests, aspirations, and conversations.

- Compatibility and similar traits between partners promote marital happiness. Couples who have similar personalities, backgrounds, and interests tend to get along better.

- Sexual satisfaction and intimacy are important for a fulfilling marriage. Couples need to develop a good sexual relationship and intimacy to avoid infidelity and build closeness.

- Mutual understanding, trust, and respect are crucial for a lasting marriage. Partners need to be considerate of each other's needs, supportive, and willing to compromise.

- Shared goals and values help strengthen a marriage. Couples who have common life goals and moral values tend to be more content in their relationships.

- Financial stability and compatibility aid marital happiness. Couples who manage their finances well and agree on spending habits tend to have fewer conflicts.

- Physical and mental health issues can strain a marriage. Conditions like addiction, mental illness, and disabilities require effort and understanding from both partners.

- Similar family backgrounds promote marital success. Children of happily married parents tend to have more successful marriages themselves.

- Premarital counseling can help resolve issues before marriage. Seeking advice from professionals and discussing expectations can prepare couples for the challenges of married life.
There are lot of think could be done not to pay $12 delivery fee over a $20 order. For example, the cost of delivering a $100 order is pretty close to a cost of a $10 dollar order. This could be used for subsidizing the cheaper delivery cost by the more expensive ones, like saying delivery fee is 25% of the order and no tip, but minimum $5 (or something). So you pay $5 for a $10, $5 for a $20, and $25 for a $100 delivery, which is way easier to swallow. But this is just one of the most primitive ideas to handle that, the point is the make companies to figure out what is feasible, instead of letting them run rampant with whatever shady sh*t they can come up with.
Unlock Your Entrepreneurial Potential: 5 Lucrative Online Business Ideas to Achieve $10k in 6 Months!

Discover the top five online business ideas that can help you earn a minimum of $10,000 in just six months. From dropshipping and digital product creation to affiliate marketing, virtual assistant services, and online coaching, we'll guide you through each step of the process. Our layman-friendly explanations and actionable tips will ensure that anyone can embark on this journey to financial success. Don't miss out on the opportunity to work from home, set your own schedule, and embrace the world of online entrepreneurship. Start building your path to financial freedom today!
Opium addicts pass out, alcoholics beat and rape thier wives.

That's a line straight out of the temperance era.

I don't know why I needed to be more explicit....
Well, I did meet my wife in college. If she had gone to a girls’ college (which I assume means girls-only, do they even still have those?) then I wouldn’t have met her. Frankly, that probably would not have reduced her chances of marriage, but I think it would have reduced mine ;-)
This just all depends on what circle you're using the word "hacking" in. While technical circles are mostly concerned about the technical details on how someone might exploit a system, legal circles don't really care. They usually avoid using the word "hacking" anyway.

The relevant law here, the CFAA, is often referred to as the US law that criminalizes "hacking", but what it specifically does is criminalize anyone who "intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access" which is much more broad than how technical disciplines might use the word.

So yes, stealing a password off a friend's post-it note and Hasselhoffing their instagram might not be considered "hacking" if you're hanging out at Defcon, this would be considered "hacking" in legal or colloquial terms.
On the plus side, you now have a book with an interesting story!
> Many were fired/demoted from that.

Did they fire/demote the brain geniuses who kicked this off? Because the corporate stories I know like this generally involve the responsible parties getting promotions for their bravery and forward thinking, while the pain falls on the people they forced to work on it and who unaccountably failed to implement their perfect visions.
Because that's what quantum mechanics in it's purest form tells us. Avoiding the many worlds requires tagging on extra stuff not in the equations.
Post proof that exercise variety is detrimental to achieving lifting goals. I'll concede that if you are competing in a strength sport, it is best to focus on the movements in that sport.
Perhaps tangential, but my team and I have been able to avoid a lot of disagreement by asking ourselves if we truly need to make a decision in that moment. We found that we'd often debate/disagree about issues that were not pressing. Even more specifically, we noticed that many debates were over issues where we were nearly guaranteed to have better information in one week, one month, etc, when we'd truly need to make a decision.

So why debate now, only to have to debate again with new info?

We still practice disagree & commit among the three founders, which is simply a majority vote game, but now the number of heated debates has decreased.
Aside from it opening a new product category, I honestly don't see it changing the startup landscape much at all.
How? KVM and Xen are kernel level. QEMU uses KVM but also has a software virtualization capability. Libvirt is an API abstraction over it all. virt-manager is a gui app to manage libvirt machines. Proxmox as well. Proxmox VE talks to VMHost via libvirt.
this is just the search engines feature on chrome...
No no, you'll just see someone and realize through sight alone they are your _true love_. Fate will have happened.

Or you'll hookup with someone and then through a rom com series of mishaps end up falling in love accidentally!

Remember, you can't choose to love someone. You are a powerless pawn. You need fate or the stars or an accident to fall in love.

I'm being grumpy but we've developed a weird cultural learned helplessness when it comes to relationships. We're so afraid to be seen as judging other people most folks can't even seem to directly take action.
Meh, not having to worry about configuring load balancers and letsencrypt alone is worth the effort to get k8s running.
Somewhat off topic, and somewhat related: I don't think there actually is such a particle as a graviton.

General relativity says that you can't tell the difference between being unaccelerated, and being in free fall. But in one case you have no gravitons coming in, and in the other you have gravitons. I can change whether gravitons are there or not by a (general) relativistic transformation.

But that's not possible. Either the gravitons are there, or they aren't. There's not two sets of reality of what particles exist for two different coordinate systems.

Therefore gravitons don't exist. The bending of spacetime is what's really going on, and there is no quantum version of the gravitational field. (Except possibly that the bending of spacetime could be quantized, but that's not what we mean by a graviton.)

I am very open to being shown to be wrong here. Can anyone do so?
New study reveals most classic video games are unavailable
> there's also just a certain percentage of people who will ignore everything you put in front of them and then complain.

These are the people you don't want as customers. Perhaps one polite response then just ignore them. You can't please every idiot and trying to do so will just drag you into their idiocy.
I agree with your sentiment in general, but Threads isn’t intended to be new, it’s supposed to be Twitter, competently run.
You’re not a candidate for upselling and both they and you know you’re going to wait or walk over to Best Buy and get an iPhone.

Revenue lost = 0

The percentage of HN types storming out screaming “I’m going to just go buy Android” is a rounding error.
It was called social science first, then rebranded as social studies later to be more inclusive, after the British society of the sciences made the term 'science' a lot more exclusive.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-intellectual-...
Well, in case you decide to move back, give Sidebery a try. I switched a while back haven't had any issues.
Are you arguing that Uber’s business model isn’t sustainable or that it’s bad for both parties? Uber being in the red doesn’t mean it’s a net negative for everyone.
I like it this way to be honest. We needed to create a custom controller for Dask clusters consisting of a single scheduler, an auto-scaling set of nodes, an ingress and a myriad of secrets, configmaps and other resources.

It wasn’t simple, but with meta controller[1] it was relatively easy to orchestrate the complex state transitions this single logical resource needed and to treat the whole thing as a single unit.

I’m not saying Kubernetes can’t make simple patterns easier, but baking it into core leads to the classic “tragedy of the standard library” problem where it becomes hard to change that implementation. And the k8s ecosystem is definitely all about change.

1. https://metacontroller.github.io/metacontroller/intro.html
There's a plugin that does this for Safari: https://apps.apple.com/app/keyword-search/id1558453954
Post proof that deadlifts and squats present unique danger.
Since you mentioned textbooks on differential geometry, I can recommend anyone interested Sigmundur Gudmundsson's lecture notes in introductory differential geometry as well as Riemannian geometry. You can find them freely available on his personal academic page.

https://www.matematik.lu.se/matematiklu/personal/sigma/
Reminds me of: https://igotstandardsbro.com/

Similarly: https://realitycalc.com/
wouldn't that lead to analysis paralysis? it seems you're avoiding the decision which many people consider the worst decision
But you're not a novice, you clearly know what you're doing. I'm saying that somebody who's just starting out and doesn't know how to do a proper squat shouldn't be tinkering with their sets too much.
The Forensic Psychiatrist in Revolutionary Russia
Poe's law.

If your bs is indistinguishable from that of a trolling fascist pos, then why is the onus on the reader to engage in greater effort to distinguish you from such, particularly since that would permit the use of Sealioning in order to damage the ability of the reader to engage with superior works and not have thier mind slowly contaminated with the propaganda and disingenuous bs that fills such works?

Ed: came back BC there's a chance I've over reacted, primarily due to the frequency I've actually encountered those who use such games and hold such mindsets, all self identifying not just as right wing, but every class, and thus I find your actually ideology irrelevant and the fascist term is used as a short form for your engagement with the material and expectations upon others.

Self declared Leftists can be fascist too.
When I first learned about the sidecar pattern I thought it was great. I am not sure about it anymore. Most of it could be propagated to custom images or layers at the boundary. To me this feels a bit sketchy. Too have containers that kinda is part of the mesh but then does not share the same lifecycle as the mesh.
Yup. Cancelling should be easy, but one-click for something that can't be undone is unreasonable. This is especially an issue with web pages as the nature of browsers will cause occasional wild misclicks--you click just as the browser succeeds in loading something that caused the layout to change.

I very much favor type-to-delete for important irreversible actions--and when it's delete one of a list the type-to-delete is the name of the object you are getting rid of. I never implement one-click for options which are rarely used and are potentially bad. This isn't a dark pattern, this is simply sensible UI design. (My entire career has been spent programming for industry--I have absolutely zero reason to implement any sort of dark pattern as my users aren't my customers.)