skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hard to reverse actions need multiple safety switches, for example, turning off the machines in that region for 2 weeks before deleting them, which would bring support issues to attention ahead of the no-going-back step of deleting data.
That's not was he's saying at all. He's saying you can train an AI on copyrighted material just like people can learn from copyrighted material.

If you acquire the material illegally that a separate issue that training AI doesn't give you any protection against.
Crosses should appear in other rooms at the same time slot for that person
Right on the money
it's a totally different model of generating demand. They don't need marketing, because they have a completely captive audience of loyal apple fans who will easily saturate the first year (or even two years) of supply for this product.

They are following Palmer Luckey's "Make people want it first model". Being supply limited, traditional marketing would only generate demand they can't satisfy. What they actually have to do is make sure every person who gets one has the most perfect experience possible.
That’s not what it is.
Right, but that blows up the causality of the stat proposed above.
I asked it a simple question about an address on Google maps and it couldn't answer
> My point was simply that that question can't even be reached if the maker of the LLMs doesn't have a legal right to fair use in the first place (because they don't legally own their copy).

I agree, and I expect that eventually we will start seeing injunctions against creators requiring them to remove content that they don't have legal access to from their training data sets.

And this will probably end up at the Supreme Court.
These alerts are useless for developers. They contain no detail as to what should be done and are non-actionable.
The point is that GP has no reason to believe Google, like Meta, also used copyrighted materials for training its AI. Why did Sarah Silverman sue OpenAI and Meta but not Google?
If they ripped all of Bibliotik, the more interesting story to me is how they were able to get it all without hitting ratio requirements?

Super fast internet that downloaded all they could before being ratio banned, overwhelmingly fast internet that was hopping on all the popular torrents to slowly build up ratio?
I just bought on the website and stuff showed up. The stores are for moms and kids.
> Is the addition done by itself, so it costs 1 clock cycle? Is it merged into some complex operation so the net cost is less than 1 cycle? Is it completely optimized away at compile time, so it's infinitely faster?

Those are generic instruction selection/optimization questions, which are always gonna be *additional* complexity to any and all operations everywhere. So there's still benefit in cutting down the complexity elsewhere.

> Is the addition by itself? Or are there store and load instructions that can stall for way more than 1000 cycles?

..those are questions about the loads & stores, not addition. On embedded, afaik loads & stores will be significantly closer in latency to arith too.

> At the same time, every single person that is good at micro-optimizations look at the compiled binary as a first step, because C is a high-level language that has little relation to the code the compiler actually creates.

Yes, but being able to have good intuition is still quite important, because one can think & read code much faster than compile & read assembly.

> the people repeating that execution time is well known didn't actually practice micro-optimizations based on that fact.

The question of operator overloading is mostly about reading code, not writing it. And it doesn't have to be micro-optimization either, any level of optimization will be affected by a call happening where you don't expect one (probably most importantly the kind where you scan over a piece of code to figure out if it does anything suspiciously bad (i.e. O(n^2) or excessive allocations or whatever thing may be expensive in the codebase in question) but it isn't worth the effort diving into assembly or figuring out how to get representative data for profiling the specific thing).

Or you could just be exploring a new codebase and wanting to track down where something happens, where it'd be beneficial to have to just scan through function calls and not operators.
The vet my cats get their routine care at has switched to suggesting intranasal for most routine vaccines in cats. The evidence seems to be that intranasal conveys a slightly better immunity (possibly by specifically sensitizing the mucous membranes) and avoids the small but well-characterized injection-site sarcoma risk, at the cost of a 30% chance of some minor cold-like side effects for a few days.
it sums products, but convolution is summing products in a particular way that is not general matrix multipication

i typed special characters with the compose key; cf. https://github.com/kragen/xcompose

not as easy as latex but more compatible
Max said the voice acting industry IS on the case.

You can see him and me here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGchbES0DhU

the commenters are all his followers, I guess. I don't know any of them.
For a lot of those papers in the trailer it is not at all clear to me why they are at SIGGRAPH. They seemed more about figuring out the state of a simulated physical system than about how to draw that system.
Great clarification. People ought to know that a lot of vaccine skepticism is related to excipients and not the actual vaccine. All types of injectable preparations tend to contain preservatives, for example, some of which (like thimerosal) have been controversial in the past
How many did basic > compiled basic > turbo pascal + asm > C > C++ > perl/python > ...
Any experiences using Delphi for Android/iOS (and cross-platform generally) development? Seems like the only cross-platform solution that wraps platform WebView on each platform, has an imperative GUI, RAD IDE and produces a native code.
Ten lines? Why so complicated? Back in my day we did it with just two lines:

mov al, 13
int 10

And then you pushed your pixels to the video segment (a0000). So simple and elegant...

But my dad still mocked me because it was too complicated! Back in his day, you didn't need to bother with stupid video modes, and could just POKE the pixels to your screen!
> I don't think making humans comfortable is the goal with respect to AI

According to whom?

AI in games, has historically been all about human comfort/enjoyment. Extremely good AI that seems "unnatural" to humans is usually not the goal.
But… there is no spoon.
Really nice API. Compare to Mac of that era you needed to create and maintain your own event loop and have a bunch of branches for when a certain thing was clicked.

To show a basic dialogue you had to continue to draw it over and over in your loop.

Windows took care of devs!
I’m talking about virtue from Harvard, and so it should be the input. If you have virtuous input, then your output should also be virtuous, unless the school is doing something that scrubs virtuous habits. Of course, I’m treating this as a black box that will admit anyone over a certain criteria, but that’s not reflective of the real world. So I don’t know if it’s based on input or output - so probably both?
You are confusing the face scan for FaceTime calls with the one they'll do at the store for optimal fitting
Cats seem to be a bit over-vaccinated these days. The FeLV (feline leukemia) and FIV (cat HIV) vaccines are pretty silly to administer outside of high-risk situations. Indoor-only cats who've tested negative and don't interact with other cats really don't need them. Despite this (with guidance along these lines provided over 10 years ago), many vets still push at least the FeLV vaccine. I got our cat his latest FeLV shot last fall after he turned two, but I don't think I'll be continuing it in the future.

There are now three-year versions of the FVRCP and rabies vaccines that can be given once the cat is no longer a kitten, which should cut the risk of injection site sarcoma by quite a bit. I probably wouldn't recommend against rabies vaccination, since contracting it is a death sentence. The three diseases FVRCP protects against are all super contagious and pretty dangerous, so same deal there.

I was reading about vaccine-associated sarcoma / injection site-associated sarcoma last year, and it seems pretty scary. You have to notice and recognize it pretty much immediately, and perform surgery. Often removing the tumor isn't enough, and you have to amputate the limb, assuming you get to it quickly enough, before it spreads to the rest of the body. This is why current guidance is to give cats the shots as far away from the main body as possible, as doing so makes it easier to remove any tumors that might result. (And even then, there's still often recurrence, even when "successful".)

If vaccinating via the tail is just as effective as the hind leg, this seems like a win. Amputation sucks no matter how you dice it, but I think a cat will recover better and more fully after a partial tail amputation, over a limb (even partial) amputation. I do wonder how widespread tail vaccination is, though. I've never heard of it, even though this paper was published nine years ago. Our vet definitely doesn't do it.
You're really going to charge me for a bogus app like this? I already have a pro account with GPT
SEC Statement on Access Control Deficiency in Administrative Adjudications
Part of the problem is it's hard to find people who want privacy due to that very privacy they crave, and their general mistrust of large organizations make it difficult to form them into a large organization for that reason.

Basically they find security in obscurity, and feel they have a better chance of surviving under the radar on their own.
This is not definitely not redistribution any more than writing a blog post of a book you read is.
I’m gonna guess “finding”.
I won't dispute your level of enjoyment from it, but I'd have to ask: did your fellow engineers feel the same way about it? What was your time commitment like to deliver?

Also, if you're looking for a thrill, I would highly recommend going after cloud-based infra providers. There's never a shortage of unique problems there.
Sausage is a good analogy. It is both (at least with chains of trust) the manufacturer and the buyer that benefits but at different layers of abstraction.

Think of sausage(ML model), made up of constituent parts(weights, datasets, etc) put through various processes(training, tuning), end of the day, all you the consumer cares about is the product won't kill you at a bare minimum(it isn't giving you dodgy outputs). In the US there is the USDA(TPM) which quite literally stations someone(this software, assuming I am grokking it right) from the ranch to the sausage factory(parts and processes) at every step of the way to watch(hash) for any hijinks(someone poisons the well), or just genuine human error(gets trained due to a bug on old weights) in the stages and stops to correct the error and find the cause and allows you traceability.

The consumer enjoys the benefit of the process because they simply have to trust the USDA, the USDA can verify by having someone trusted checking at each stage of the process.

Ironically that system exists in the US because meatpacking plants did all manner of dodgy things like add adulterants so the US congress forced them to be inspected.
This code is rough, and that's an understatement, but here's a basic gist showing how I'm doing what I'm doing in case it helps you in any way: https://gist.github.com/craigsc/fdb867f8971ff5b4ae42de4e0d7c...

I'm similarly using R2 as my static hosting backend and it's been pretty fast and seamless

note that i'm using the geotiff.js and fast-png libraries for the heavy-lifting behind the range-queries and the client-side png encoding. why reinvent the wheel, right?
> Declining achievement levels

Nope. Do the homework here.

> the perfectly horrible results in inner city schools

Another claim remarkably free of any data

> the disparities between different racial groups.

African American kids today score better than white kids 30 years ago did.
The creators should seed the site with content. This is what Reddit and many other social platforms like Tinder did.
But acquiring the material illegally is the thrust of the issue, and the point of the thread here: the notion that large companies can get away with piracy if they just execute it on a large enough scale. Copyright infringment for thee but not for me.
Yeah, that's kind of the point I was trying to make. It's an innapropriate compuational model, so the answers you get out aren't meaningful.
I've found a lot of people obsess over tools to solve something like their personal productivity or management issues, which is like buying better cars to get better at driving.

They'd do better to either find a driving coach, or start riding the train.
Hi
Did have success on littlefs on stm32 ?
On arduino ?
Please, contact me
tcpipchip@hotmail.com
PS: sorry if I post here
Wow, this is very neat. Awesome project
> well-resourced students are more likely to get accepted into, and graduate from, elite schools. Happy to back that claim up with some research if you like.

We agree on this, but it's also a major confounder for observational word gap studies. And though we try, it's very difficult to fully control for confounders.

The holy grail would be interventions that can improve adult intelligence but unfortunately a lot of interventions that look promising in short term studies see their benefits disappear by the time the children reach adulthood. There don't appear to be any long term studies on this yet (I know this is a big ask).
No but unlike many peer countries we actually test all of them rather than a select few.
Your argument boils down to this: because we cannot look at an operator and have a 100% iron-clad guarantee of the exact sequence of instructions the compiler will ultimately emit, we should throw it all away and just settle for every operator in the language potentially being a function call that might be O(1) or O(n) or even O(2^n). That's called throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

every single person that is good at micro-optimizations look at the compiled binary as a first step

That isn't an option when you're writing portable code that runs on many different platforms, some of which may not even exist at the time you're writing it. Furthermore, micro-optimization isn't the only reason operator overloading is bad. The implicit flow control dramatically inflates the search space for what every single operation can do, making all code much more complicated to inspect at a glance. This carries over to debugging, where stepping through code is much more cumbersome when each operation can involve large amounts of indirection.
> Any other related rererences - the tech that enables this sort of tracking?

It's everywhere in mobile devices. It's better not to use them.

If you must use one, you must at least have root to disable AGPS + add stringent iptable rules to disable any outgoing communication by default: you should only enable connections per app, or per IP/domain for what you need.

Still, that'll be of a limited help since the baseband manages connections (3GPP profiles etc) and does the equivalent of NAT to your device.

For all I know, the baseband could tell android "location disabled? sure thing!" while still getting GPS fixes + sending the position by UDP packets processed by the baseband OS: Android won't even see it! Yet by virtue of sharing the same IP (or being "enriched" with your IMSI as you can see above), you will be totally trackable.

Doing anything more requires running free software on the baseband: there're now free-software firmwares like https://github.com/the-modem-distro/pinephone_modem_sdk (I'll submit that for discussion)

It started from initiatives like https://www.reddit.com/r/PINE64official/comments/hflat0/pine... but now you even have a free software bootloader for the modem (see https://github.com/Biktorgj/quectel_lk)

If you want, you can also recover the stock firmware (https://github.com/Biktorgj/quectel_eg25_recovery), but the ability to audit from top to bottom to disable data exfiltration requires a 100% free software solution.
This is approximately what (yes, somewhat irrationally) irritates me about kayefabe.
I think you can skip VC++97 and develop with msys and mingw. I haven't used those to target 9x in a long time, just older NT, so I'm not sure how up to the task it is these days. But I think it can get you more recent versions of C and C++ that route.
Counterintuitively, HN has proven it is the corporations who are truly the socialists...
Tell you what, let's make sure some of the trucks on the road have brakes before we get into anything fancy, ok?
An alert is hardly the place to list detailed code warnings. I think the prompts are enough to have one open their app in Xcode and review the specific depreciation warnings.
Because I don't like "magic". I can understand the appeal of one-liners that do the work of 100 (or more) lines of C but that's just not what I like to do. I like to be in control. I don't like side effects. "Undefined behaviors" is a propaganda. In my 15 years of programming in C, I never had an issue with "undefined behaviors". Things I created a decade ago still run like a champ on a damn coin cell.
Ironic that the video of the vise is recorded handheld it seems
No negativity in sight on threads.

Someone explain again why we traded talking for 144 characters...
Well, mission accomplished, no? Wasn't the point of all the new restrictions, to reduce scraping and so on?

In other words, the operation completed successfully, and the patient is dying.
PinePhone Modem SDK
Nice. This solution is a type of dynamic programming, in disguise.
Piracy of content is against the law. All other analogies such as looking at paintings are not at issue here. The content was pirated and there are laws against that, whether we agree with it or not.

So, if the plaintiff can prove the content was pirated, then the use of that content downstream is tainted.
This is why jmkb referenced synchronization rights, which (as I recall) were invented when they seemed useful. jmkb is suggesting a new right might be created, not claiming that they already exist.

(even if it wasn’t sync rights, there was something else musically related that was created in response to technological development. wikipedia will have plenty on it)
“They” in this case includes Damon himself. It’s not some separate group of people protecting the audience from Damon’s deceit. If I say to you “I am acting as a character” and then proceed to do so, where is the lie?

Similarly, if I say to you “This is nonsense: Water does not exist” was I lying as I spoke the last four words? Context is kinda important I think.
And you think Apple has no use of warnings for themselves? The OS is as much a test version for developers as it is for Apple during the beta.
Calling such shameless pocket-stuffing a "risk management issue" seems to rather be like calling a drink-driving accident that kills a pedestrian an "unforeseen kinetic event".
While my dad shopped for one for my sister I had time to drink a coffee, find a Mother’s Day gift of chocolates, and do some work (the Apple Store outside Apple Park has all this).
I've read Stark, and he goes way out in front of the actual documents we have. The high middle ages contained elements of a market economy that eventually developed into mercantilism and thence capitalism, which is very different from your claim that capitalism is a lot older than 1549. (You also seem to be conflating mercantilism and capitalism, incidentally, but either way the result is the same.)
The lawsuit claims that Meta hired ex-Twitter employees to build Threads, which seems to be both factually untrue and not illegal even if it were true. Are you shifting the goalposts to a different claim?
Even if you found all the good ones manually, I bet there aren't more than 20 or 30 worth playing...
Thanks so much for your advice! I agree, having the opportunity to use the language as part of your daily-work helps massively, and is one of the best but most difficult options to realize. I'm aware this will come with some sacrifices (pay reduction, longer hours to catch-up) which I'm willing to make while I become more competent.

As for the second point, that is a great suggestion. However, I'm very limited by my current working environment (regulation, corp. restrictions, etc.) so it becomes a little more difficult.

I believe I will just have to push very hard for option one and continue to study areas of interest in my spare time. I'm reading xv6: a simple, Unix-like teaching operating system which is helping me grasp some practical applications using C.
Slight tangent to your tangent, but, after a poor experience last week, I'm really disappointed in how Apple handles specifically support in their stores.

Historically, I've been able to just throw in a few little bits of "yup, I know how that works" so that their techs realize that I know what I'm talking about and let up with the patronizing assumptions about what I do and don't know. However, this time, when dealing with a newly-present heat issue during charging after that very store replaced the battery in the phone (so both a safety issue and one that would be warranty if it could be determined that it was caused by the repair), the tech just kept repeating that there was no way that their work could've caused it and going "these phones don't have a fan to cool them like our laptops". No matter what I said, I couldn't get them to have an actual discussion with me, so now I'm stuck waiting for a call from their safety support team since it's a heat issue.

Hopefully I can get somewhere with the phone support people, but it's really disappointing that they don't train their techs in the stores to feel out what a customer knows or at least drop some of the "oh the user doesn't know anything" if customers are showing that they do, in fact, know things.
Agree, moving the weights inefficiently will end up working the muscles you don't necessarily target in your main workout. It's less efficient, but probably gives a (very slightly) more well-rounded workout. If you're pressed for time, it could make sense to have a basic understanding of how to avoid dilly-dallying during your workout. If you go to a public gym, there will be other factors that affect your total time much more, like having to share equipment, which introduces a lot of uncertainty. Maybe these micro-optimizations are worthwhile if you have a private gym.

From a well-being/philosophical standpoint, maybe it's better to live life relaxed, and not one where you have to micro-manage every minute of your day to squeeze out every inch and penny of efficiency you can. That sounds like a horrible lifestyle, but I guess to each their own :)
As my boss used to say, "well, now you're being logical."

The LLM true believers have decided that (a) hallucinations will eventually go away as these models improve, it's just a matter of time; and (b) people who complain about hallucinations are setting the bar too high and ignoring the fact that humans themselves hallucinate too, so their complaints are not to be taken seriously.

In other words, logic is not going to win this argument. I don't know what will.
Objectively, I think it's reasonable to say the technology was bad compared to what is/will be available in the next 12 months. There are actual material technology breakthroughs that really do fundamentally alter the equation (primarily: micro-OLED displays, significantly faster mobile processors and distortion-free pancake optics).

The original phrasing is ambiguous as to whether its acknowledging the tech was bad or not. But it doesn't seem reasonable to conclude that people don't want something until they can experience an implementation of it that isn't "bad".
I always wait 6 months before upgrading to a new MacOS versions - the best thing about MacOS is being able to get on with work without having to mess with the operating system!