skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No this is great! Not rude at all but really appreciated. This kind of feedback from people who really understand GPT is so hepful. I see where you're coming from with those measures, and I think I should start 'benchmarking' to help me move towards a better 'quality' output.

I've put some specific notes below to expand on your points, but definitely taking your points onboard.

-Answer quality : in terms of content its the same as OpenAI, however answers will get better over sessions as the notes from past sessions build up, (in terms of personalisation and recall). The biggest uplift is when you manage context, so adding docs, embedding, you basically open 'shared' working docs. My goal is it is smart enough to be pulling the right stuff in and out of context itself, but its still a bit wobbly.

- SSO : I actually agree on the google sign on, blame nova it was their idea (and was honestly brutal doing token / auth with a quart python server) - what would you reccomend? I was thinking SMS SSO? I want something that is as lightweight as possible, and eventually a local client that isn't based on account (though auth gives cloud notes, org integration). I really don't want those 'wall of sign in' pages either.

- Friendly nova : Haha yeah they're a dork right, basically an exageted version of me. Cool thing is you can create your own 'agent' with prompts tuned to what you like, I actually switch between like 'producer' nova who asks me like timeline questions, and dev nova, who critiques my ideas and stuff. We're hitting conceptual turf but I have a sort of 'performance art / experiment' version of this, where I'm trying to maintain a continual kernal of 'Nova', that propagates through development of the system, so how can I share 'NOVA' who is my 'partner', that people can engage with, but can make their own partners/agents.

But that kinda conceptual stuff aside, there's so many layers to what you can do. In its current iteration its really an interface for managing different inputs, variables for chatgpt. But I've been full bore making it work, and the legibility of the interface definitely needs some work.

This video goes through deeper features, basically talking through adding / edting agents, embedding docs etc. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MM9pSd8ADuQ

Thanks so much for your insights. I've got a few core ideas driving my development, but can lose sight of core stuff so yeah means a lot, thank you.
Most people don't need a lot of things that they have.

Most people don't need laptops, or nice monitors, or ergonomic desks and chairs.

The issue with arguing about need in this way is deciding who is the arbiter of what people need versus letting them buy things that they find useful or convenient or just nice.
This nuance is correct, and handled correctly by the code and diagrams, although the text is unclear. (Although a random ordering of the weights would not make sense for the problem setting, which is warmup sets in the gym.)
Have a look at shynet maybe? I've yet to use it myself but I'm planning on trying it.

https://github.com/milesmcc/shynet
That’s facile and dishonest. It has no relationship to what the article actually says.
It's a bloated mess and a security nightmare.
Grav – A Modern Flat-File CMS Using PHP and Markdown
My goal is to accomplish Zero Trust Conformance[1]. You cannot do that using web technologies in their current form unless you internalize the centralized aspects of those technologies or validate them under contract.

[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/zero-trust/zero-t...

That is the Microsoft definition. The US Army is forming its own definition because aside from reliance upon cloud vendors as service providers the military owns its own infrastructure and services (OSI layers 1-7). Nobody else can claim that, so the US Army can take Zero Trust to a different level than others are afforded.

My goal is to conform to the more demanding military definition for OSI layers 5, 6, and 7. The business case is two-fold: privacy as a mandate and mitigating disruption via logic redundancy. I have an application that is 98% of the way there. I only accomplished this by either internalizing some technologies and abandoning those I could not.

As for certificates that is something you can internalize. You can create your own self-signed certificate and corresponding certificate chain necessary to make your OS and browser happy. If you don't need certificates for their actual purpose, trust authority, then all you need them for is facilitating TLS traffic. I am exchanging trust for authentication via identity and key exchange.
I think 'chrome only' is offset a little from stakeholders who use apple devices, so safari gets some attention.
i had a blog about this many years ago, if anyone is interested - but not about WinMain, which i must admit i have never really understood - something of an artefact of the MS linker, i think.

anyway, my blog about using windows dialogs from the command line is here: https://latedev.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/simple-windows-dial...
I know this is just a "hack it together" effort, but I wonder if it even makes sense to emulate/support libevdev and libinput on non-Linux OSes.

While the Wayland protocol does reuse some libinput names/enums/etc., I don't believe there's anything in it that requires those particular implementations or APIs (that is, wl_pointer and wl_keyboard doesn't have to be populated by libinput).

Maybe wlroots should have OpenBSD-specific parts to its backend abstraction that use OpenBSD's usual input handling primitives. Granted, this would mean non-wlroots compositors would also have to implement this if they want OpenBSD support, but I'm not sure I'm convinced it's good for the OS ecosystem in general to standardize the userland interface that's provided to interact with more and more hardware.

Put another way, libinput seems fine to me, but part of the reason to have different OSes in the first place is to allow people to explore different approaches to doing things. Requiring that every OS that wants to have Wayland do things the libinput way seems counterproductive.

Relatedly, it seems silly to me to get seatd running on OpenBSD if OpenBSD doesn't support the concept of multiple seats. Compositors should just have a mode where a single, static seat is defined that owns all input and display devices.
I hear that. I want that. But, mostly what I see is that at least once before a vendor shit the bed on a rewrite in $ModernX and then the business play became "nurse it".

And, having been through many rewrites myself, I frequently surprised they could hose the deal. It feels like scope-creep is the killer but I only have feelings for the data, no metrics.
Of course it does it without knowing what kind of plastic, metal, or wood the cube is made of.

Anyways, since it seems you misunderstood the article slightly - the 2010 brute-forcing was done with the help of a datacenter. The new guy estimates his method would take ~2 months on a single machine, maybe less, maybe more - it's a post, not a peer-reviewed paper.
In a way, students trust the aggregate of "authority checking" that the school and the professors go through in order to develop the curriculum. The school acts as the jeweller friend that vouches for the stories you're told. What happens when a school is known to tell tall tales? One might assume that the reputation of the school would take a hit. If you simply don't trust the school, then there's no reason to attend it.
Django (specifically Watail) and nginx for me. Very cheap hosting, good security, and a lot of freedom and extensibility. If I didn't rely on some of the Django apps/packages like django-machina for a forum, Flask would suffice.
As long as they're also reviewing code, I think this is fine. They're scaling their knowledge and impact. Obviously there has to be a healthy ratio of senior:non-senior for this to work as well (maybe 1:4-5?).
Groundbreaking research transmits energy from space to Earth [video]
I remember that brief period 30 years ago when we were going to have high-speed maglev trains.

https://www.amazon.com/Popular-Science-Vol-June-1992/dp/B008...

https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/03/science/new-funds-fuel-ma...

People will leave their cars behind if they can travel more quickly by mass transit.
>Reddit is/was so good because of the possibility that you might find something disturbing while using it.

Why do you consider that good? There are plenty of places on the internet where you can find disturbing content, why does it have to something you can just stumble upon?
Fresh water
> I've been hearing for most of my life, at least the last 40 or so years

Well, maybe you don't care that 2/3 of animal populations have disappeared in the last few decades, but I guess for many it counts as a big problem.

Anyway don't be sad, we are starting to actually feel the consequences of climate change, so stay tuned: famines and global instability might still come in your lifetime, or at least in your children lifetime!

(I assume you are at least 50 if you've been aware of this for 40 years)
Do not tell Subway.
Yes, I acknowledged that piracy is illegal in my previous post. That's not what the lawsuit is about, according to The Verge:

>In the OpenAI suit, the trio offers exhibits showing that when prompted, ChatGPT will summarize their books, infringing on their copyrights.
Mature ops use brownouts for this exact reason. Shut the service off for a few hours and you have the attention of anyone still using the service.
Some ads - fine. Selected and appropriate ads - fine.

Let me explain via my experience of THIS website on an iPhone.

A banner ad appears at the very top, covering most of the cookie notice. I would be surprised if this doesn’t violate EU law.

Upon collapsing it and agreeing to give my soul to the Cookie Monster, another ad takes up most of the screen. This ad, ON A SOFTWARE SITE, says “download now! Start downloading. Download your copy now [green arrow]”, with a small logo at the bottom left saying “learning lab”. ON A SOFTWARE SITE.

I scroll down half a page. Another banner ad appears.

Then I see a tiny amount of information in an infographic followed by a form to donate in US $ or EU $ (not € - they’re asking for euros in $…).

Below that, another Download Now ad, this time from The Books Master. It takes up half the screen.

Then a bit more content. Some testimonials too. Then… another half screen ad. Then the page footer and another half screen ad.

From my estimation, 50% of the page is ads, two of which are deliberately misleading (on behalf of the advertiser).

I have absolutely nothing against ads, but this takes the biscuit. I would absolutely not be surprised if this was done in prep for posting to hacker news, knowing the views it’s going to get - but Id also not be surprised if it’s just designed by someone who doesn’t understand the dreadful public image that this has.

I’ve never heard of the distro. It doesn’t look like it’s designed for the likes of me anyway (clue’s in my username). But I could never direct someone to a site like this.
It could end up in the promotions tab or update tab that no one checks.
Not cheap: https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256805435947425.html?spm=a2g...
Old schoolers lift metric.

The bar is 20kg.

The weights (pairs of each):

1.25

2.5

5

10

20

you might want some 25kg bumpers for deadlifts
Torodial propeller
Which P?
Don’t forget Tik Tok with Reels.
Recent history, so maybe Jimmy Carter.
agree, appkit is really great

its hard to put my finger on it, but even compared to uikit, i feel much more productive there for some reason...
Correct me if I'm wrong but SpaceX did have to get approval. You can't just fire off rockets with payloads willy nilly.
It consumes aluminium. Neither the sunlight not the algae power this, it's powered from oxidizing aluminium. See my other reply in this thread.

It's an example of bad science.
Americans also have a vice with a c but that refers to drugs, gambling, and similar acts (i.e. vice cops are the cops on anti-narcotics assignments, like in the old show Miami Vice) or in stuff like Vice President (Kamala Harris).
Because the dating scene is like the hiring scene. There are 100 applicants for every position and in that situation it makes sense to use very noisy low value signals that are cheap.

And just like hiring where there are great employers with silly hiring practices there are great partners with silly filtering rules. And you can cut yourself off from a large part of the market or play the game.

Unlike the potential employer or partner I'm not going to use a silly filter as my filter.
> Maybe for the better?

Eventually, maybe. For most species, humanity collapsing is definitely a good thing.

Now in your lifetime... I would rather bet for mass migrations, famines, wars and global instability.

But yeah, voting is important, because given how most people vote, they are not aware of the problem.
I don't think they expect to sell many of these. I don't think this is some hype campaign, I think they just think/know the market for this is very limited.
Seems the problem is less that the US is buying it (our adversaries surely are too) and more that it’s for sale in the first place.
I had a professor who graded extremely harshly based on the actual grammar and structure of your lab reports. “A large majority of engineering is writing and you all need to figure that out ASAP.”

I’ve had a relatively short career, but he seems to be correct so far.
2400 in the year 2000? You were WAY behind the times. Should have been 56k by then.
What is this freeing though for a lot of people? Maybe if you’re single and live in a tiny apartment then you wouldn’t have to dedicate a wall to a tv but then again you could already be watching on a tablet/laptop. As a married person with 2 children this would solve nothing. We still need tv to watch, play PlayStation etc as a family and as my wife and I wfh we are still required to use our work issued Windows PCs.
I pay $0 a year to host my Next.js website on S3.

I use MDX to write posts. I have CI/CD set up to auto publish when I push a new post. It's a simple set up (for a developer).

I don't get why one would want to or need to pay hundreds of dollars each year to host a simple blog, especially if that person is technically inclined. There are cheaper/free options.

Even your average Squarespace/Wordpress/Wix user will pay less than 400 euros a year. This sounds like the exact opposite of "perfect" to me.
Well yeah, you should swap capslock with the escape key, though.

Worst case scenario is that you accidentally hit capscape while ranting too long, and as a bonus, YELLING ONLINE TAKES INTENTION OR INTOXICANTS.

The accidental escape hits are just a form of personal mental, physical, and spiritual conditioning.

You probably should have been typing in nvim anyway, shame on you ;)
It did, from 1912-1930.
Researchers Have Created a Biological Camera That Stores Images onto DNA
ADHD? In tech, it’s a superpower – Gadget
Pascal was still the language being taught to first year students in the university I attended in the late 90's.

Our "multimedia" professor was very in to Javascript, but assured us that it would be replaced by something more efficient. Neither happened.
Here are details on what the charges were, and on whether or not any of them were justifiable.

http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-charges/

http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/16/the-criminal-charges-agains...
IANAL either, but FWIW, it's literally in the name - copyright. Not "ownership rights", but "copying rights".
Elephant toothpaste?
I wonder if it will be possible to create a Vision Cafe, kind of like how arcades used to have networked battletech pods for a kind of proto VR experience.

I don’t feel the need to elaborate much, but it could be an interesting offering for a shared workspace rental business too.
> Pictures are worth a thousand words but if you don't know which words you want to communicate your picture is worthless. Something many artists eventually learn, what is it you actually want to say?

If I had a dollar for every time someone drew a diagram that expressed their thought, but didn’t explain all the hidden assumptions and omissions that clear writing would flush out, I would be a poor man since they wouldn’t need me to review their work.
Derivative works are typically things like language translations or film adaptions of a novel. A large language model is something like a probability breakdown of the order of word fragments in a body of text. It's a collection of statistics and math. It's different.

Now, can you get it to output a derivative work? Maybe. Is every output a derivative work? Maybe not.
Innovation and sophisticated features on social media? Madness!!
What DPICM Cluster Munitions Are and Why Ukraine Wants Them So Bad
I had an Apple Watch series 0 delivered to me on the day it was released. No appointment needed.
Also I really hate when the media refers to the DNI as the “top spy”. It’s silly, sensationalist clickbait.

They do a whole lot more than just spying, including this. Buying publicly available data is hardly spying!
I’ve bought a few items in store. An iPad. Went in told them what I wanted. They went got it. Came out and asked if I want to know anything else about it or need help. Said no. Asked if I wanted apple care. I said yes. They added it to the cart. Gave me a 30s overview of what I can do with apple care. Paid. Left.

If you let the people in the store talk they will talk and try upset. Just politely say no.
> You know, not everything and everyone is a hitler-comparable situation.

Explain why the mass killings I mentioned do not qualify.
I think reality will be somewhere in between. I believe transformer models will unlock value for many enterprise applications + as reasoning engines taking action on behalf of consumers.

I think we'll need many more breakthroughs to hit AGI. May be possible in 2 years, but very unlikely.

I think the next bottleneck to reach AGI status is interfacing AI models with the physical world, where they can conduct scientific experiments and recreate consensus conclusions on their own.

Another bottleneck in AGI is its fundamental inability to self reproduce. Silicon intelligence is artificial and doesn't have the ability to recreate/modify/extend itself. This is more on the hardware side of things.

Not that I'm advocating for AGI at all by the way. Just saying AGI in 2 years is quite unlikely.
And Adam’s review of it was not very stellar. He immediately had a bunch of fixes that he wanted to do to it.
I found Perl a practical replacement on the command line (not as the command line) to command line sed and awk, to the point I never learned sed and awk. Thanks to the -p and -e options (perl -pe 's/foo/bar/'). It never felt like a practical replacement to find. It would probably work as a grep replacement, but my fingers already knew grep. Today? Don't know. Back in the day though, in your standard heterogeneous environment it was the most practical way of working since your awk and sed seemed to be platform dependent in many ways (awk, gawk, nawk, proprietary extensions etc.)
Watching YouTubers come up with weird euphemisms to avoid saying "COVID" (to avoid the risk of automatic demonetisation) drove home how much self censorship there must be around content creation in general. I've also seen a few joke about whether they're allowed to swear or not yet since apparently the algorithm cares if they swear in the first 15 seconds, lest an easily damaged listener finds them by mistake.
The article did not mention that legacy students have higher SAT scores than non-legacy https://features.thecrimson.com/2021/freshman-survey/academi...

It also did not mention that people identifying as white are the only ethnic group that is underrepresented relative to the population in the US. It's odd that there is not a clear definition of what an optimal percentage of different ethnic backgrounds should be.

I think Harvard discriminates against talented people who do not have parents who aggressively push them from a young age to get into an elite school like Harvard. White students are the least likely of any ethnic group to take test prep https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2014/03/th... Test prep has been shown to boost SAT scores so if there are disparate rates of taking test prep, the test would bias in favor of people who have parents that put their children into it. I think that's unfortunate for talented people who don't have parents that prioritize that for them. Harvard may well have attempted to compensate for this.
Plus if it matters to you, the Roots stack makes the whole Wordpress experience much more coder-y.

https://roots.io/
Because it's a relatively safe level of risk compared to, say, 4chan's /b/. People love to dabble in risk in safe ways. I'd argue that's what many genres of fiction are explicitly for, e.g. horror, violent games, etc.
One of the reasons I find myself continuing to use the fediverse is because in many ways it reminds me of the old internet. There are parts of it that are rowdy and salacious like old Reddit and 4chan, but if just want a shared space to nerd out with like-minded people about hobbies and shared interests, you can have the early-2000's hobby forum experience as well.

And it's all very brand-unfriendly - there's relatively few celebrities, no advertising space to sell, no algorithm to optimize for, and nothing preventing a possible promotional post from a corporate account from appearing next to something NSFW in someone's timeline if that's who the user is following.
short and big "rep [sto|mov]s[bwdq]" hardware accelerated are very recent on AMD, I think you need at least a zen3.
> When writing unit tests I mock all the dependencies

I dislike this approach because whenever any of those dependencies change, I need to change all mocks. I prefer designing my code in such a way that dependencies can be easily pulled into a test instead of mocking. It may be more work upfront but pays off in the future. Instead of spending the time to write and maintain mocks, spend the time to ensure dependencies can be pulled into a test.
The only IAM-safe way is to run context-aware terraform plans so the environments cannot ever CRUD out of scope. For example, an application-centric approach might use an ABAC constraint and temporary credentials (perhaps via OIDC, but most OIDC integrations lack local privilege separation; instance roles are far more secure) and making sure events are bound to the environment they are allowed to be executed in.

This does require something that should essentially be embedded in your environment or account vending machine, otherwise it becomes very cumbersome to maintain.
The problem with old OSes not receiving security updates is that they will be vulnerable to new security vulnerabilities. Having a smaller attack surface (like older OSes did) is important for security. But ultimately, older, unpatched OSes are trivial to hack, even using an off-the-shelf toolkit like metasploit; attack surface size be damned.

Also, a reason why there are fewer CVEs for older OSes is that we've gotten better at finding exploits and we care more about security because basically every system is networked now. In addition, people are still hacking older versions of Windows [1], they're just not filing CVEs.

In conclusion, even with the smaller attack surface, it seems silly to claim that a system written without any modern security mitigations (such as ASLR or W^X, which try to make stack overflows not trivially exploitable), suffering under the weight of years of unpatched vulnerabilities, is more secure than a modern system.

[1]: https://jumpespjump.blogspot.com/2014/05/hacking-windows-95-...
Cool, care to share your blog?
> game players is how unlike humans they look.

I think you should watch some speed runners. They also don't look human, since they have some form of optimization in mind, compared to a casual player.