skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> DELFTship is the commercial successor, but it's daunting

Author of DELFTship is an author of original opensource FREE!ship in Delphi. But after FREE!ship v2.60 project was abandoned on SourceForge.[0]

Then FREE!ship was forked and extended into FREE!ship Plus[1] by Associate Prof. Victor Timoshenko[2] (National Univerisity of Shipbuilding, Mykolaiv, Ukraine). FREE!ship Plus v3.50 was the last release of extended fork in Delphi, and it also got a lot of closed source freeware plugins.[3]

Since 2015 FREE!ship Plus was forked into FreeShip Plus in Lazarus by Mark Malakanov, initially it was planned as a port for Linux[4]. Project is active on GitHub.

Also, there was the ShipCAD — a try by Greg Green to rewrite original FREE!ship to C++/Qt, but it was unfinished and abandoned.[5]

[0] https://sourceforge.net/p/freeship

[1] http://web.archive.org/web/20160927052330/http://www.hydrons...

[2] https://linkedin.com/victor-timoshenko-33a053a

[3] http://web.archive.org/web/20160927062856/http://www.hydrons...

[4] http://web.archive.org/web/20160822054832/http://hydronship....

[5] https://github.com/gpgreen/ShipCAD
No, Lima just sets up a VM for you. Colima is a wrapper around Lima that can configure a Docker daemon and context for you. You still need the Docker CLI to use Docker.
> A more likely outcome means there are many more worlds with that outcome. You can calculate the percentage of worlds that have that outcome.

First of all, this is a new postulate of QM, you can't derive it from the Schrodinger equation. It is perfectly equivalent with the measurement postulate.

> Measurement, observer and classical shouldn't be part of a physical theory. The answer as to why things appear that way to us is decoherence.

This contradicts the other part, where you were talking about a notion of worlds that can be counted. If they can be counted, they have to be defined as classical worlds. Decoherence only explains why worlds can't interact with each other, it doesn't help define what they are without appealing to measurements. Even the notion of "the environment" is somewhat ill defined if we go down to the philosophical level.
> The disparate impact rule is challenging to begin with because literally every policy has a disparate impact

“Disparate impact” prohibited by
the rule isn't just unequal impact, its unequal impact without sufficient justification (what qualifies for that differs between the employment and housing contexts where the rule is applied.)
There are people who believe we shouldn't have personal vehicles at all. Would it be OK for them to deflate the tires on Priuses and Nissan Leafs they find parked in their city?
The implication sign “→” in A→B is a morphism from Bool x Bool to Bool (where "Bool" is the set of Boolean values).

Similarly, pretty much ANY binary operator can be regarded that way as long as the sets involved are defined carefully (for instance, "/" works on R x (R - {0}) since it's not defined for the second argument zero)
Sure, but the person you were replying to specifically said ownership not usage.
> some retired Grandma who writes popular mysteries is going to have to pay the government regularly to keep amazon from selling thousands of copies of her work without having to pay her

Well, for the first 5 years after publication, no. She would need to do nothing exactly as the world exists today. She would have an exclusive period of 5 years to monetize the book exclusively without having to register it, pay anyone, or talk to anyone.

After 5 years, she would have to pay $500 (again, exact value for discussion purposes, not a final proposal) and register it with a government website (with her contact information, and attesting that she still owns the work). After 10 years, she would have to pay again, and update the registration. Or, if the works are no longer valuable, she could simply not do that, and let the works enter the public domain.

The _entire point_ is that works that _aren't financially viable_ enter the public domain rapidly, and works that are continuing to produce financial value would be worth registration. >99% of works produced would likely never be registered (since every comment on a website counts as a separate "work"), and would enter the public domain after 5 years. Only a small fraction would be extended for 5 years.

But, yes, if you want exclusive rights to your game for 10 years, you'd have to pay a small amount of money and fill out a form on a website (my goal would be about the same difficulty as updating your whois information for a registered domain name). If it's not worth that amount of trouble, then the work enters the public domain.

> Everyone who makes a side project game on itch.io has to keep it online forever

My proposal had no _online_ requirement. So, no, that wouldn't be part of my proposal. Don't know where you got that requirement from.
> our minds collapse the wave function

While I know there are many sources available of people saying this exact thing, this is a common misunderstanding of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics. There is nothing special about our minds.
Oh absolutely... and that's a great analogy for the more computer oriented, "Reflections on Trusting Trust" highlights how it can be the supporting infrastructure of replication that passes on the relevant information... a compiler attack like that is equivalent to things like epigenetic information transfer... and for fun bonus measure since it came to mind... the short story Coding Machines goes well for really helping to never forget the idea behind "Reflections on Trusting Trust" https://www.teamten.com/lawrence/writings/coding-machines/

It definitely would be minimised data transfer, be it via an epigenetic nudge that just happens to work by sheer dumb luck because of some other existing mechanism or a sophisticated DNA driven growth of some very specific part of the mammalian connectome that we do not yet understand because we've barely got the full connectome maps of worms and insects, mammals are a mile away at the moment... no matter the mechanism evolution will have optimised it pretty heavily for simply information robustness reasons, fragile genetic/reproductive information transfer mistakes that work, break and get optimised out in favour of the more robust ones that don't break and more reliably pass on their advantage.
Cheers, appreciate you clarifying!!
Speaking as a physicist I think its very far from obvious that digital physics (or anything else) is the correct approach from a philosophical perspective.

Real numbers are so ubiquitous in physics because space-time (and other quantities) look really continuous.
My understanding is that Colima is based on such a front-end, but Lima is not.
> What was the Oxide process like?

Can't speak to the complete process, first step was fill out a google doc just to submit an application, and was ghosted from there.

> What did they have you write?

Work Samples, Writing Samples, Analysis Samples, Presentations Samples, Psychological Questionnaire

> What was the role?

Rust Embedded Systems Engineer or some such. Which given that I was previously the lead for a high availability modern C++ RTOS, had programmed in Rust professionally since 2017, and would regularly give talks on the state of embedded systems work in Rust (using slides running as a bare metal application on an Nintendo 64 written in Rust to put my money where my mouth was), I figured I should at least get to talk to someone there.

Starting with a giant doc you have to fill out just to apply should have been a sign to just not even bother, but I had a lot of respect for bcantrill. Some of which has now eroded.
I'm struggling to understand how qemu with free page reporting isn't exactly the same as a firecracker balloon.
I agree with the general idea of what you say, but this is not intended to put anything on a firm legal footing.

As I understand it, EU privacy law is fundamentally incompatible with US spying requirements, both sides know it, neither side cares.

The plan is to make one illegal agreement after another, each giving about 2 years of pseudo-protection until the slow EU legal procedures catch up. Then start anew with the next agreement.
This. It's more like a happy accident. If Oracle had a stated principle which was virtuous, and did something to specifically to uphold that principle when anyone else might have done something else, that would be something you thank them for. And this is not that.

However there is also another idea that I think is valid, which is "reward the behavior you want to see". Whyever they did it, if it's good, you let them know that you want that and you don't burn them the one time they do something you always say you want.

I still don't thank them though. There is no reasonable hope of ever influencing Oracle to become something 100% the opposite of what they are at their very core. So F them. I see no point in worrying about failing to reward the behavior you want to see in this case. You will never get the behavior you really want out of Oracle, and so all you would be doing is letting them influence you, not you influencing them.
How far do you drive every day? I knew an importer of fine foods that drove over 200 miles every day, but he was a bit of an outlier.
They explain in the most recent/top post on the site.
Is this related? https://www.emproof.com/attacking-microcontroller-readout-pr...
The American banking landscape is on the cusp of a seismic and painful shift
I have the app, I'm logged in. Please explain how to get my compensation... its costing me a lot
City and community colleges exist, and are mostly free. But for most people, colleges are more than just an education. College is about signaling their aptitude. And so people keep trying to pile into expensive private school for the prestige.
We should discuss this in a zoom call. I've scheduled it for eleven-fleventy χm. Don't be late!

...the need to synchronize global tasks means that either you have easily-offset local times, or you just use UTC everywhere and keep it in your head when local wake / sleep is and refuse synchronized tasks outside those times.
Is there something like this but for “home” usecases? What’s in my pantry, how much of y do I have left in my medicine cabinet, etc.
I don't have numbers but I've read enough stories about it that I think it's far more likely than winning the lottery.

The bigger problem is that people _think_ it won't work and they don't bother trying. How many folks could have met the hardship burden but didn't apply?

We need to stop repeating the falsehood and instead be truthful: Student loans CAN be discharged via bankruptcy, if the applicant meets a hardship threshold.
> we should not continue to normalise maximally disruptive acts of protest by tiny groups.

The majority of the time, it's groups doing things like this that lead directly toward what you're calling "serious protests".
That’s ePD: https://gdpr.eu/cookies/
For whom? John Lennon, Qunicy Jones, Yo-Yo-Ma might disagree with that. John WIlliams, Alicia Keys? It's fine to point out that almost nobody with that education gets to that level of fame, but, I dunno, I'd value it at well over $200k if I were Phillip GLass, Jonny Greenwood (of Radiohead), or Herbie Hancock.
> It's absolutely wild that we'd absolve loan companies from this due diligence for young adults with less credit history and no ability to default on the loans.

We haven't absolved them per se. At first they tried to get the data and make smart decisions, but there just wasn't enough data for them to make good decisions, so they denied everyone. That's why the government got into the business of backing the loans in the first place -- it was the only way to get the loan companies to make the loans.

> For the rich, those talented enough to earn scholarships, and those willing to accommodate loan companies' stringent conditions on risky borrowing, degrees with poor monetary returns will absolutely stick around as they always have.

There wouldn't be enough students to support that, because amongst those people, many would still choose the lucrative majors.

> Also, you may be right that schools start to prioritize programs that allow borrowers to earn enough to repay their debt. Why is this a bad thing?

Now we have a philosophical debate. Do we want to live in a society where no one studies philosophy, poetry, art, music, creative writing, and so on? Ironically, someone who studied philosophy would probably be more suited to answering this question than I am.
A human can literally drive all the way home from work and not remember doing so. You are surprised such an animal can fill out a text field and click some buttons?
Since everything I subscribe to has already been named, I'll ask a question: anyone got any blogs/newsletters/etc. geared toward LISPy topics that they can recommend?
It should be noted that this paper was released before the Ada 95, Ada 2005, Ada 2012, and soon-to-be Ada 2022 standards were published:

Ada 95: https://www.adahome.com/rm95/

Ada 2005: https://www.adaic.org/resources/add_content/standards/05rm/h...

Ada 2012: http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-TTL.html

Ada 2022 (draft): http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/ada22.html

The paper's abstract states: "Although Ada supports concurrency and can thus be used as a concurrent programming language, it is not generally considered to be an object-oriented programming language."

Object-oriented programming was added in Ada 95, so this paper is probably not relevant to modern programming unless you are interested in the history of the Ada programming language.
Did I say that tweets alone solve anything?
Perhaps, unlike urban planners have spent decades studying and understanding urban transportation systems and their relation to the socio-economic fabric of cities, the AV companies are just part of another giant Silicon Valley circlejerk.
Does wifi calling avoid tower triangulation and does VOIP like Google voice hide your calling number from the actual physical phone mumber?
I agree, the price must come down. But how do we get the price to come down while still making sure poor kids get a chance to study?
VirtualBox supports it, as does VMWare Player. There's a VirtualBox build for Apple Silicon, which might do the right thing.
https://archive.is/h9eUA
Apple releases emergency update to fix zero-day exploited in attacks
Other than good integration with existing command-line tools for log analysis, VictoriaLogs is also optimized for low resource usage. For example, it uses up to 30x less RAM and up to 15x less disk space than ElasticSearch on production workloads according to our tests, while providing comparable or better query performance. This allows substituting a 30-node ElasticSearch cluster with a single-node VictoriaLogs, e.g. saving infrastructure costs by 30x. Also, single-node setup is much easier to operate than a cluster, so it allows saving operational costs. And, contrary to ElasticSearch, capacity of a single node of VictoriaLogs scales linearly with the number of available RAM and CPU cores. There is no artificial limit of 32GB RAM per node [1].

[1] https://opster.com/guides/elasticsearch/capacity-planning/el...
I played with the beta for a bit and while it's a marked improvement over the old UI, it still feels remarkably old and outdated to use.

1. There still doesn't appear to be a threaded email view. Emails are grouped, but I don't see a way to view them in a thread. Just one at a time

2. Rich text emails that are just text look remarkably bad. They're just black text on white background with limited padding. If you use dark mode, it still displays with a white background; many email readers have moved away from that

3. If you click an email group, it opens a summary view instead of an actual email. In order to open the actual email, you have to expand the group by clicking a tiny arrow

4. Having a landing page for an account still seems odd. It just means I have to keep the account open and click Inbox instead. Each of my 4 accounts have about 30-50 folders each so my sidebar is basically impossible to navigate unless I switch to the Unified folder view which has a separate list of issues

5. Going back to #2, if I reply to such an email in dark mode, the quoted text appears as black on dark gray.

6. The composer definitely needs some love

Basically, it still requires 3-4 clicks to do a ton of things that other clients can do in 1 click. Postbox, which forked Thunderbird like 15 years ago and I used for close to a decade, is also looking dated at this point but is much easier to use than Supernova.

Some of these things can be improved or changed, but I couldn't find a good combination that created an experience worth switching to.

It's unfortunate because I had been planning to switch to Thunderbird from Spark v2 since it was announced last year. Instead, it prompted me to re-evaluate Spark v3 which seems to have resolved most of its early issues. I'd prefer to use OSS, but not at the cost of productivity.

Negativity aside, it does look much better than it did previously and I can see the makings of a worthwhile client in there. It's just not ready for me yet.
It feels like there's always one of these and the end result is always very predictable. Selling expensive bikes to people who aren't already using bikes just isn't a big enough market. Anything that's an actual ergonomic improvement gets picked up by the established manufacturers quickly anyway.

Bikes are extreme mature tech, with established players offering a broad configuration of tradeoffs between the major axes of optimization (reliability, performance, cost). E-bikes are newer and there's more room for exploration but it's still a very well-understood product.

Aside from that once you're above the lowest-cost options bikes are kind of their own distinct aesthetic tradition. Subjective of course but definitely real. There's room for a brompton's nerdy utilitarianism but from what I've seen these kinto tumbler ass bikes just have zero appeal to the kinds of people who are most likely to spend $1000+ on a bike.
Yeah the "gravitational hum" would not seem to be the same as gravity itself having some inherent randomness. On the flipside, in a very real sense if the cosmological history of our universe is such that we exist in a universe with an always present indeterministic hum, then for our intents and purposes this is the same as gravity itself being random... unless we can devise experiments to study gravity in other universes with different cosmological initial conditions.
Thank you ♥
What I like to do is get a Wondows VM on Mac. I couldn’t get Sketchip to work under Wine so actually installed Win10 again (ugh).
The days of free dialup internet with the advertising bar oh man
Given you need to be at least a millionaire to have an Apple Vision outside Apple I am not sure you assume this is only for poor people.
> It really isn't. Again, that's when the least is known. I think a much better point to set a particular standard is when there's some sort of team disagreement that would be solved by setting a standard. At which point you'll have more information than you would have had before starting.

This probably depends on the size of organization, and the likelihood that the product will survive long enough to require such revision. In my line(s) of work, the odds have been high and it's proven critical to make sure these points are clarified early. If the project is likely to be canned in 6 months anyway... then people can do whatever they want :)

While this stance is fundamentally Anti-Agile, I don't see this as a problem. While Agile's emphasis on rapid iteration is correct - my experience has been that folks forget the importance of testing a meaningful hypothesis or achieving a meaningful milestone in these iterations. In a vast number of domains, it's much easier and more effective to do detailed design work then jump straight into coding. The design process should hopefully land the team on the correct thing to build, how they are going to build it, and why they are building it.
> The site is in Russian

The site was in Russian and English, but it was a site of Ukrainian maintainer of FREE!ship Plus, see details and link to page in English in my previous comment.[0]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36670328#36671965
I've been to my local Apple Store once, and it was a great experience. I was there to trade-in two M1 Macbook Air's. No associate was available however I got one after 5 minutes and they very quickly completed the trade-ins without any questions whatsoever, and wished me a great day. No attempt to sell/upsell me a product (I told them at the beginning I was going to purchase online) and they were very friendly.
maybe grocy
Gasoline remains relatively inexpensive. These vehicles are relatively more expensive. Furthermore, lease cycle aside, a car is something you replace, as necessary. Few are going to wake up and think, "I need a car payment. And I want it to be more than the one I recently paid-off." Finally, in terms of planning and production, it makes sense the supply of EVs is greater than that of gasoline-fueled. That is, as brands prepare for EV sales, they likely cut back on making traditional vehicles, which lowered that supply. That is, it's not simply sales per se.
Awesome then! I don't know if I'm the exception, but my Win9x years were mostly offline or with a 56k modem, so online updates were off the map.

I was expecting one would need to tweak the registry or plug some custom DNS entries to get the updates running.
> That’s why we have laws and penalties for breaking them.

Which aren't really enforced in many places. Leading to tyre slashing to become a fashionable form of criminal 'activism' in a social media world:

https://twitter.com/T_Extinguishers

(And promoting that sort of behaviour on social media is apparently just fine, destruction of property apparently isn't 'real violence', yet in many other cases, mere words are now considered to be violence)
Can you describe the different shape? What does it turn into? Once live I clean up the FF. But, may introduce new ones as the now-live feature gets tweaked.
This is great. My team at Netflix (I'm not longer there) sponsored some of the work behind this, via Kinvolk (now acquired by MSFT). Great to see that it finally shipped. At the time, this was a blocker to us using Kubelet, and we thought it might take a few...months to sort out. Turns out it was closer to a few years, but its a tricky API, and important to get right.
Turkey Agrees to Support Sweden’s NATO Bid, Clearing Main Remaining Obstacle
What if some actor no longer wants a movie where they're portraying the main character to be distributed? Should they be allowed to do that? Should the studio be forced to stop its distribution or edit the actor out of the scenes that they appear in?
LLVM was Open Source and supported GNU from the get-go, it didn't make sense to remove support after Apple bought up the core contributors. Clang is indeed an Apple original, but developing it without support for multiple platforms would be paramount to removing features supported in the underlying compiler.

If either LLVM or Clang tried removing multiplatform support or totally relicensed itself, it would divide the community and make life hard for Apple. They could probably make WebKit a fully proprietary browser engine by rewriting the KHTML stuff, but what would they gain by removing features from an Open Source product they developed?
Here in California you can go to JC almost if not completely free. Transfer to a UC school with TAP (guaranteed), and save considerable amounts of money. I will never recommend paying for a 4 year university, it's just not worth it when you can get the same exact diploma for half the price.
And has the populace gotten more educated?
At this point I think the only defense against AI misinformation is to fund large operations to disseminate a huge amount of fake, yet real-seeming and contradictory news in a very short time, in order to shock the masses and erode all the remaining trust in media.