skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Collectively owned apps (Socialist software)
I’m fairly certain collectively owned apps will be “a thing” in the future. By that I mean, paying users will have their money distributed directly to the people building the software and not to a middle-man “owner” that obfuscates the price and bags a profit. I think crypto will enable this future on a corporate scale by allowing complex pools of money and coordinated payments. The more users, as long as costs stay fixed, the less it costs per marginal user. This will be especially helpful in areas of inelastic demand. I think this differs from a DAO in specific, nuanced ways. My question is:

1) Do you agree with me? If not, why? I’m curious to understand if I’m missing something here.

2) What is holding back the adoption of this model? Is it possible today or does specific infrastructure still need to be built in order for it to exist?
Just enough spaces to reach the next tab stop.
I also noticed that many boards are 3xHDMI+1xDP now. My previous card was 3DP 1HDMI
I stand corrected, looks like that has been resolved in the latest version of CLion, with the Rust plugin.
I wasn't even talking about your capacity to force your judgements on others, just that they're morally valueless beyond your own mind. Nice to see where your thinking is at, though.
I was feared as a kid for relentlessy bullying adults with this question.
I just remember that most got really annoyed quickly, but some special characters were almost impoasible to crack.
In the end everyone gave up.
SpaceX Starlink satellites 'leak' so much radiation it's hurting radio astronomy
MicroBin v2 Released
Near death experiences and consciousness after clinical death
Thanks, I confess to skimming and missed the individual 'expert' column (presumably the mean of the individual expert scores).

That said -- it looks like not only does model+ do worse than experts on the other 12/18 (not 11/18 by my counting), but when it does, it does so by a significantly wider margin (2x-3x on average). For example, the maximum model+ outperformance is on label 'Stealing' (0.11) while there are 6 labels for which the expert outperforms (by margins ranging from 0.12 to 0.29).

In other words: distinctly sub-par compared with the average expert. Which is probably why they didn't claim it as a result in the paper :)
Doing microservices from the start is fine if you know what to expect. Having worked with massive monoliths, there are cons that people don't consider longer-term and the longer you dig yourself in the harder it is to pull yourself out.

Honestly I think the realistic advice should be to go monolith if you or part of your team aren't experienced with microservices or if your app is simple / you'd be overengineering it otherwise.

If you're starting a SaaS company, you can envision the moving pieces, and will be growing your team quickly microservices properly in the beginning can have a lot of benefits.

Just feels like another one of those dogmas people just mindlessly scream on the internet all day without considering all the cost/benefit analysis for each particular case.
Twitter Sues the Law Firm That Made Elon Live Up to the Contract He Signed
It's funny how people casually throw out how something has "conclusively" been proven and yet it's a hot debated contentious issue that 50% of people don't agree with.

Well gee, zo1, if it's been "conclusively" proven then it should be trivial to convince them to change their mind, right? Perhaps it hasn't been as "conclusively" proven as we've been led to believe.
Oh, but that's not a different video interface.
This reads like a hitchhikers guide bit lol I love it
"JIRA’s strength is being" amazing for enterprise development teams and mediocre for everyone else.
It's not just face detection. It does some level of object detection as well.
Keras was a high-level wrapper around Theano or Tensorflow.

The creator of Keras was then employed by Google to work on Keras, who promised everyone Keras would remain backend agnostic.

Keras become part of Tensorflow as a high-level API and did not remain backend agnostic. There was lots of questionable twitter beef about Pytorch by the Keras creator.

Keras is now once again backend agnostic, as a high-level API for Tensorflow/PyTorch/Jax. Likely as them seeing Tensorflow losing traction.
Turning our language into a comma-free code feels... less than ideal. Doable, for sure. But why?
It'll work fine as long as the babelfish understand not to transliterate place names. Human history is chock full of this: "Istanbul" just means "within the city", "Zhongguo" (China) just means "the land in the middle", "Ohio" and "Mississippi" are just two different ways of saying "the big river".
There is certainly nuance but UHC’s net income has grown from under $4B in 2010 to over $20B today.

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/UNH/unitedhealth-g...
The example is a chemical company, which still need a laboratory, some equipment and storage, and possibly some people (sellers) to keep the deals on with the other companies - I don't think other chemical companies will just click a button in a system, they will want to talk with a seller. Everyone here is reading with the lens of a software company, but I think rarely software fits 3 and 2.
If they can't give up Google Analytics or Google Ads, but still want the perf, give Cloudflare Zaraz a try. I am Product Specialist there, if you need an intro in person, happy to do it. Just reach out to me on Linkedin / twitter.
Sure, there is a place for operator overloading.

That said, in my experience over the decades, operator overloading has been one of the primary causes of bugs that are very hard to pin down, so I have come to hate it. It hides far too much.

The cost/benefit ratio of operator overloading is generally unfavorable in practice, in my experience. Which is not to say it shouldn't be used when it actually clarifies things! But those situations tend to be fairly niche.

Interestingly, where I work right now, using operator overloading is specifically prohibited. So I'm confident that my dislike of the practice is not just a personal quirk.
If you are interested, I am happy to show you how to build agents that use tools. Just email me at sina@shahandeh.com
If society has proven anything, it is that criminal justice systems are imperfect and laws are arbitrarily defined by the most powerful individuals in a country.
1) If you read Nvidia GPUDirect RDMA page closely (https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/gpudirect-rdma/index.html), you can find this paragraph:

"Traditionally, resources like BAR windows are mapped to user or kernel address space using the CPU’s MMU as memory mapped I/O (MMIO) addresses. However, because current operating systems don’t have sufficient mechanisms for exchanging MMIO regions between drivers, the NVIDIA kernel driver exports functions to perform the necessary address translations and mappings."

This change address this problem in a accelerator-agnostic way.

2) GPUDirect RDMA has the limitation that two devices must share the same PCI Express root complex.

The change eliminates this limitation: the data transfer is at the lowest level of the PCIe tree, so you can isolate smart nics and GPU/TPU/accelerators with a PCIe switch and not saturate the PCIe root complex bandwidth.

(From https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230710223304.1174642-1-a... "Advantages")
Same, I remember the rakeback on FTP and it was glorious!
Different diseases. Not every colon cancer, for example, behaves the same. And if colon cancer spreads to the lungs, it's still colon cancer, not lung cancer.
Former Manson Family Member Leslie Van Houten Is Released on Parole
You can have multiple accounts on one IP. Plenty of people have throwaway accounts. Entire nations would be blocked due to CGNAT if it worked the way you suggest. They're looking at more than your IP address though (my guess is ip+useragent at the very least; the API rate-limited by useragent).

Your problem is that one of the heads of your hydra caught a ban, after which point everything you do is assumed to be malicious. Given the political nature of what you were banned for, there is no doubt in my mind this is intentional. It's not an overt act of discrimination if they just don't answer the phone after "accidentally" locking you out.

For your own sake, move on. Reddit isn't worth fighting for. It's just a bunch of schoolyard bullies squatting on the playground equipment, throwing rocks at everyone and crying victim. If you're not a member of a protected class (or pretending to be), they don't want you there.
I agree with you. Function overloading is just as bad as operator overloading.
For sure. I'm not saying the current system is perfect, but recognising flaws is the first step to improvement.
>at some fairly low price point you hit a perfectly adequate level of quality

Buffalo Trace for bourbon, for example.
>It's not an assumption. It's literally based on the results of your own reference:

Human performance generally decreases with level of exposure so I figured you were talking about something else. Guess not.

>I don't think additional conversation is worthwhile because it becomes apparent that it's more dogmatic than reasoned

By all means, end the conversation whenever you wish.

>It goes into further detail about how LLM can have high accuracy while also making simple, unpredictable mistakes.

I'm well aware. So? Weird failure modes are expected. Humans make simple, unpredictable mistakes that don't make any sense without the lens of evolutionary biology. LLMs will have odd failure modes regardless of whether it's the "real deak" or not, either adopted from the data or from the training scheme itself.

>If I didn't know better, I'd assume you could just as well be a chat bot who only reads abstracts and replies in an overconfident manner.

Now you're getting it. Think on that.
But if an app developer in a different industry doesn't know the history behind it then a must be worthless.
Plenty did but they were usually DVI-A or DVI-I
Cloud Compute.

Seems like a huge lost opportunity for by Intel not targeting the "consumer" cloud compute market with NUC's, because they wanted to protect their high margin server chip business.

There's huge classes of workloads that a NUC would do just fine on for the cloud, and cloud operators would love the lower power & physical size of these NUC compute devices.

AMD has embraced it, and you'll see 7000 chips at various cloud compute companies like OVH & Hetzner.
Sonatype Offers Its Malicious Source Code Blocker as a Service
I like that you specifically chose "Bitten by duck" which you could say is itself a form of billing.
If your development style demands uninitialized variables, you can set them to `= unimplemented!()` during development.

And as someone else said, if all you want is unused variables without warnings, you can say at the top of the root of the crate (`main.rs` or `lib.rs`):

#![allow(dead_code)]
Nominal profits are more work to analyze since you have to figure out if UHC is selling to 5x as many customers in 2020 as they were in 2010, and then also adjust for inflation and a bunch of other stuff. It is simpler to just look at profit margin.
Show HN: Coding Guru
Built an AI Chatbot and added a codebox for people learning how to code/preparing for technical interviews. So you can learn and write the code in the same place.

Let me know what you think
.2s is slow for a redraw. Just because it might take you 200ms to click after something happens doesn't mean you can't see/notice when things take that long.
This question has been (very unsatisfyingly) answered, or at least resolved:

> When the model is recast to represent realistic distributions of uncertainty, we find a substantial probability of there being no other intelligent life in our observable universe, and thus that there should be little surprise when we fail to detect any signs of it.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02404

SSC has an article on the paper as well

https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/07/03/ssc-journal-club-disso...
There are devices that will give you HDCP 2.3->1.4 conversion for compatibility reasons (or maybe wink-wink reasons), and after that you can use a HDCP 1.4 stripper. There are also devices that will strip 2.2 outright (they are marketed as HDMI splitters but, oops, one of the two outputs has unencrypted signal, an honest mistake); not sure about 2.3 though. Completely agree that HDCP makes everything harder, but in this scenario it would also make attacker's job of descrambling the eavesdropped signal harder. And this is after they have overcome packetization and spread spectrum hurdles, which the paper suggests is very challenging to do, so would be a (hacky) defense-in-depth for DisplayPort. Even more important for HDMI/DVI which lacks the aforementioned hurdles.
Stability, runway, my father had a bankruptcy where he was accused of having his hand in customer funds. I strongly believe the right kind of partner can unlock incredible wealth in this case.
what's "traditional ML"?
If you want something different, but aren't as concerned about performance you can use User-Mode Linux to do this, which I used to use to isolate package building as well as working around bugs in BtrFS. I have a simple script here [0] (though it relies on some setup here [1]). Although I haven't looked back at it for a bit (2016).

[0] https://rkeene.org/viewer/tmp/fakeroot.sh.htm

[1] https://rkeene.org/viewer/tmp/fakeroot.Makefile.htm
Objects aren't an ideal tool for modeling the world, and immutable objects and variables even less so. Objects and classes often come in handy for modeling something obviously fake, like a video game.

I've never thought, 'Gee, this game would be so much easier to program if I had to copy every data structure when I wanted to update it, and have programs be impossible to step through because I'd rather write a pure program with no good debugging tools just to sound cool.'
This is the ideal scenario, where if we'll be getting fragmentation due to Twitter outflow, at least it leads to specialization for different optimal scenarios.

Human identity is important in order to reduce astroturfing which has reached critical proportions and is literally defining and destroying businesses, political regimes and so on. So the interest in abusing anonymous accounts, fake accounts, AI accounts, is great.

But anon accounts are also needed. Having distinct platforms, one that focuses on human identity and decency, corporate cleanliness & user friendliness, and one that focuses on anonymous accounts, decentralization, power users, but may also come with trolls, abuse, scams... seems like a nice duo.
#1 doing it in many 20-30min batches with little kids

#2 see #1

Jokes aside, IMHO there was not a single challenge standing out in terms of implementation; getting the pieces to work together and finding residual bugs was hard. LLDB was my friend but still missing valgrind on Mac. Writing (and re-writing) the docs really helped with mental clarity and not having to stress about a deadline was not hurting either. I often just closed the lid and made it my future self's problem with good success ;-)

Oh, and one thing I am proud of: how well the recursive search generalized to path copying. That came together very nicely.
For that kind of use case, you'd want a blade server or similar, not a NUC. In particular, you'd want something that works with a rack.
Why wouldn't they expect it? If they need that medicine/treatment, they need it. If I don't have car insurance my organs won't shut down and I won't die. If I don't have medicine, they do and I will.
That's basically what you'd expect to see if they're using the 80% as a target. They're not going to hit it exactly and it's politically disadvantageous to come in on the wrong side of the line, or for that matter to come in exactly on the line.

Much more advantageous to raise premiums and therefore profits by 400% and then be able to say that they're at 15% vs. the permitted 20%, even though the 15% would be 60% if they'd kept claims from going up.
> The worst part is that there is almost no clear coaching for how a person is supposed to get through this type of situation.

Not true. Before you buy someone a skiplegged ticket you explain to them how this works. Why their ticket will say a different destination from where they want to go and why the airlines want to discourage the practice. Explain what things can go wrong (no checked-in luggage, things can go wrong with diversions).

If someone can’t understand the concept, or it confuses them, or they are too naive or too honest to play this “deception” or too busy to receive this information then just don’t and buy a regular ticket.

> What are you going to say?

Simple. They might ask you where you are traveling to. Answer “new york”. If they ask “but where are you really traveling?” answer “new york man, how many times you want to ask the same question?” if they ask you anything about New York answer whatever you want as long as the answer implies you are planing to go there.
I had never heard the term "scramble crossing" so I looked it up, and found this gem, from the former traffic commissioner of NYC:

"As things stood now, a downtown shopper needed a four-leaf clover, a voodoo charm, and a St. Christopher's medal to make it in one piece from one curbstone to the other. As far as I was concerned ­— a traffic engineer with Methodist leanings — I didn't think that the Almighty should be bothered with problems which we, ourselves, were capable of solving."
https://archive.ph/hkajU
San Francisco protestors are disabling autonomous vehicles using traffic cones
Even better:

(plus
(mul vec1 vec2)
(mul vec3 vec4))

Lisp is love.
Hardly innovative though. My Android has an LED at the top which signifies notifications, even with different colors, even my old Android had that...

If you need continous data it might be more useful, but I can't think of a usecase where it is more than a gimmick
Yeah, but modeling the actual plane precisely as it was built is probably easier said than done. And if you don't get it right, then it's garbage in, garbage out.
Related:

Is wine fake? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33698094 - Nov 2022 (542 comments)
Consider the humble + operator. In most compiled languages -- even those that don't support operator overloading -- it is in fact overloaded. int + int. long + long. float + float. double + double. pointer + int. Would every language be better with it?

Built in operators don't always map 1-1 to CPU instructions so don't appeal to that authority. There are still plenty of CPUs -- old and new -- without multiplication, division, or floating point support.
I typed what I thought was a innocent request
What that commenter meant is that it clearly opens the door for further consolidation of the gaming industry. I can clearly see for example Microsoft buying Sega and Square Enix as we saw that filing (1) or Sony buying Konami or Nintendo buying studios. They're surely going to be coming and it's going to be bad for consumers in the long run limiting choices.

(1) https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/28/23777003/microsoft-square...
Is that real profit or profit after a bunch of accounting sleight of hand? Are they cutting their "profit" by taking heavy debt burdens via leveraged buyouts or other schemes, pulling way more than 20% off the top for their shareholders and then making it look like much less?
Yep. Super annoying. I have a Dell WD22TB4 which works great to drive 3 monitors for everything, except my Mac.
Pumped Hydro is a nice stopgap to help storage keep up with wind and solar. Batteries are still only a small percentage of our production numbers. We are still only just about 6GW which is about 0.2% of average totals. Current projections are showing about 860GW by 2030 which is about 25% of current average production. However production will need to increase significantly to offset current fossil fuel emissions.

We are reaching the point where solar and wind are so insanely cheap that it's raining soup. Everyone is scrambling to find a bigger bucket.
...unless you've already got a MOK enrolled.

For example, to install DKMS modules like nvidia drivers.

Or indeed to exercise your right to run any code you like on the system you own.
Can you contact support via https://support.anthropic.com/en/ (button in the bottom right) and mention bkrausz: that'll capture some browser information and I can dig into it from there.

Much appreciated!
I agree with AnthonyMouse that a business might be incentivized, but only if the business has so much market share that they can singlehandedly drive those prices up. Or if there is collusion between all the businesses.

But the fact that there are so many publicly listed companies, and they have such similarly low profit margins, indicates they have very little pricing power.
Sounds like you abandoned it after half a year? Would you mind to elaborate on the reason (s)?
Imagine what Russell or Wittgenstein would think of all this.
The entire point was Halo wouldn’t have been an anything exclusive. Bungee would have released it on all platforms at roughly the same timeframe.

“Due out in the first half of 2000, Halo will have a simultaneous release for PC and Mac, with multiplayer compatibility between the two operating systems. While you'll need a 3D card and a powerful system to take full advantage of the game's features, it'll be scalable so you can play it on less powerful machines.” http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9907/26/halo.idg/

Things got delayed ~18 months so Microsoft could port it to XBox thus waiting till November 2001. Then tacked on another 2 years to release it on Mac.
I don't think there's been a significant increase in the estimated # of galaxies lately. Identifying clusters is really about identifying areas of higher density that form some cohesive unit, rather than an increase in the actual count of galaxies.
https://archive.li/OrMZ5
Decoding ChatGPT's Code Interpreter
Heads makes use of a root of trust, it doesn't provide one
I understand that LLMs to date have mostly been trained on a wide variety of copyright-encumbered data but in other domains (computer vision for example) the tradeoffs are different and in practice many models are trained on private / unencumbered data. If those weights are not protected by copyright then my concern is it will be hard to sufficiently protect them via license agreement and it will become yet another factor favoring the SaaSification of everything in tech.
AFAIK it’s nothing to do with Intel/Arm swap over.

macOS in recent years dropped support for antialiasing because Apple (+ the UltraFines they sold) displays are all[1] high dpi.

The other issue with a PPI of 150 is you’ll likely end up needing to use a non-evenly scaled resolution to get things “sized” right, so even basic things like a 1px line won’t be crisp, because it won’t be rendered as 1 solid pixel.

1: Yes I know the 24” 4K isn’t quite the same “high dpi”.
Somebody drank too much Ballantine.
I would describe it differently, but I share your general take. The main weakness of SS is that once it gets heavy you really need professional feedback, because your form will begin to deteriorate. This will happen regardless of the program. Still, I wish SS was more clear about it—most beginners are not gonna film themselves and ask for form checks online, and ought to seek a coach irl.

RPE wouldn’t work either because beginners don’t know how to judge. Everyone who squats heavy knows that a huge part of getting good at it is learning how to keep pushing safely, even as the lift becomes more and more psychologically challenging.
>they are required to spend 80% of that money

I know someone that worked for BCBS and they had the nicest parking garage and a park on top of the building. Always renovations being done. I believe they even bought buildings nearby in the dense part of the city. I also think this person talked about getting a bonus.

They had some high tech security along with low tech security. It was pretty impressive at the time. 24/7 security, got to use their parking garage to for some sports game on a sunday.