skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I would add to this fantastic list: Are you religious? If so, you're probably an anarchist, too.

Most religions believe the ultimate power belongs to God. I come at this from a Christian perspective. What blows me away is how the story of the Bible is the story of God asking people to trust Him, and people repeatedly saying: No, we got this, we'll pick our own rulers, thanks. Or: You're absolutely right, God, and that's why we're going to enforce your rules (as we perceive them) on others.

Seriously, read the Bible, just as a point of historical curiosity. It never goes well for people. Read the Torah. Read to Koran. Over and over again, some small group of people says they're going to run things on God's behalf, and it always ends badly: War, starvation, genocide. It's all in there in black and white. I don't know how people miss it.

Read your history. Governments did not evolve out of some high-minded idea of maintaining peace. It's just war by other means.
It's niche, but there's gold in them hills.

People in the industry are going to notice if you get the little details wrong. So going to a "specialist" for marketing materials and mockups saves time iterating.
I tend to clone things I'm just having a quick look around in into ~/tmp - sometimes I'm intending to spelunk through the history so I don't fancy having that much data sat on a tmpfs and "running rm -rf ~/tmp/* when I notice it's getting a bit on the large size" is minimal enough effort that it's worth it for having control over when things disappear.
That does seem like an odd thing to include in a post-mortem. I can see appeasing to the layman by saying that but it’s unusual for sure.
Yeah, I share this same sentiment.

I look at each of the 3 big reactive frameworks as different types of screwdrivers in my tool belt; each with their own pros/cons, and purposes.

As commenter above said, I’ve seen a mess of all 3 frameworks; and I’ve also seen some beautiful works of art, with even Angular too lol.
It also strongly selects for people who excel at jumping hoops/working within institutions.

We make it all about smarts, but smarts aren't everything in the corporate grind.
That's mostly because movies are a condensed media that has to use shorthand for everything. (and writers are often lazy).

You don't have time in a movie to explain everything, so they fall back on tropes we all know. Like "MIT super hacker" or "Harvard miracle lawyer".

Books have all the time in the world to make up convoluted background stories that explain character details and quirks in more creative ways.
To play devil's advocate a bit - you can call their solution good from an engineering standpoint because they were able to do it quickly and cover the vast majority of cases. Yes you can seemingly easily get around this with a quick user agent switch, but 99.9999% of users won't do that, so this solution is good enough.
Merkel had no strongly held positions, that much we all know.
Thanks. Then maybe it's something else I'm having trouble with:

I'd think that (the extent to which data support a particular model) is unrelated to (subjective details such as what hypothesis the researchers intended to test).

IIUC, the criticism of P-hacking hinges on such subjective details.

If the main goal is to find useful models, why would we care about the researchers' intent when originally designing the experiment?
I'm not sure the wedge created between the communities and the platform is repairable at this stage without extended displays of good will from Reddit's side.

Lots of communities have started the process of migrating to different platforms. The federated alternatives like Lemmy have had recent success although I question the complexity of it in terms of getting mass adoption. Most of the alternatives seem to be missing the core idea of what Reddit really is (a community of communities). I think first and foremost the community aspect of Reddit is what makes it appealing.

I've been building a platform called Sociables which is intentionally not just another Reddit clone. We are trying to create an all-in-one place for people to create communities first and foremost and not just posts.

Here's an example of a community:

https://sociables.com/community/Sociables/board/trending
> Is Wikipedia accurate here?

SSRIs are a crapshoot (<50% respond). I don't know if/how the industry pushes them (they're cheap, no one 'pushes' generics).

Nothing you quoted is incorrect, with possibly the exception of:

- Reviews of antidepressants generally find that they benefit adults with depression.

SSRIs have more recently been shown to be less effective than previously thought.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/21/well/antidepressants-ssri...

> over the course of two years, the changes in quality of life reported by Americans with depression who took antidepressants versus the changes reported by those with the same diagnosis who did not take the medications.

> The paper found no significant differences in the changes in quality of life reported by the two groups, which suggests that antidepressant drugs may not improve long-term quality of life.

SSRIs can also activate Bipolar disorder.
> I believe nearly anyone could be among "the country's most talented people" if they were wealthy, given access to near-limitless resources, accepted into an elite school.

I think a lot of people, myself included, want to believe this. It's nice to think that all humans have great potential inside of them!

Unfortunately, reality might not respect our perfectly reasonable sensibilities. After having a child, I began to research the things I could do to enrich her environment, maximize her intelligence, etc. One depressing thing I learned is that intelligence is more-or-less a purely genetic trait. Your intelligence is highly correlated with your biological parents' intelligence, to the same degree as something like height.
If the owner of a news site has a stake or likely interest in inflating the importance of a specific platform, would you trust that their reporting is entirely accurate? The story looks legitimate, but as others have pointed out, maybe there was a bigger migration to other platforms? All I can say is that if The Times owned entirely or in part something they reported on, I would not mind having this at least mentioned in the comments as a form of public disclosure.

Went digging a bit, and there seem to be at least some state ownership of Weibo through the China Internet Investment Fund [1]. Corporate structure and ownership in the PRC is far outside my area of expertise though.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Internet_Investment_Fund
Had a thought, maybe someone here will know the answer -- has anyone trained a voice system on how long to wait before replying to an utterance? It occured to me that if your STT hears "hey how's it going" it should reply immediately, but if it hears "I've been thinking about <x>." then it'd be appropriate to wait a second or two in case there's more coming.
Because they don't want a repeat of HealthCare.gov
> The reason so many Asian students excel is that they're the children of (reasonably) high status immigrants.

That's not true. For instance, in NYC Asians have the highest rate of poverty. And yet they also have the highest rate of advanced placement in schools. [1] And many of these kids are from these poor families. It's because their culture values this and Asian students tend to put more effort into school. Many Asian cultures believe in the connection between effort and achievement and it shows. [2]

The first explanation suggests that Asian-American youth’s academic advantage can be attributed to advantages in socio-demographic factors. Relative to whites, their parents tend to be better educated, and they are more likely to live in stable, two-parent families with higher incomes (5). This explanation, however, is insufficient because advantages in socio-demographic factors only partially explain the achievement gap (2, 3, 5). Moreover, Asian Americans are not uniformly advantaged in terms of family socioeconomic background. For example, the poverty rates of Chinese and Vietnamese are higher than they are for whites (5). However, the disadvantaged children of Chinese and Vietnamese immigrant families routinely surpass the educational attainment of their native-born, middle-class white peers (6, 7).

[1] http://www.roosevelthouse.hunter.cuny.edu/?forum-post=resear....

[2] https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1406402111
A random word generator given enough time could do that.

Given these models have billions (hundreds of billions) of parameters, the odds of it exactly copying your code is less than 100%.

Academics when publishing run through plagiarism checkers as it happens even if they're 100% sure they haven't consulted other thesis'. (Usually 20%-30% is acceptable).

Some coders run their code through checkers to make sure it's not copyrighted. The onus similarly would be on whoever is using the LLM output to check it before monetizing it. It's just a tool after all.
> My current apprach is: don't.

Eh, thanks. That's my approach as well. I was just hoping for some silver bullet I guess.
Time scales will make you realize how most of current news are really allergic reactions.

Every week there's a new hot topic, lots of questions asked, lots of worries.. and then lots of nothing.

- greece dying

- srilanka dying

- venezuela collapsing

- argentina wiped

- lebanon

- syria

.. it goes on and on

you listen to it, think a lot, and a month later you forgot, busy thinking about the new alert. A year down the road you read about whatever country and realize all that was just noise.
I think the OP is kinda off the mark. The next step for web editor abstractions is not implementing layout engines so we can render page breaks correctly. It’s a library that separates handling input from rendering output. The biggest constricting factor with ContentEditable is that your rendered view also dictates how your input works. We need a library that handles all the user interaction and accessible, localized text input flawlessly but invisibly while integrating well with the OS. If we have that, developers can build their layout system on top or just use DOM layout without worrying about their DOM structure being compatible with ContentEditable input quirks across all the browsers, or their HTML changing in random ways under their feet.

There are a lot of problems with doing a hidden ContentEditable for input, which is what Google Docs does. Last time I looked, the input / focused DOM element was actually hidden inside the blinking caret. But that strategy is clumsy with assistive technology because the accessible bits don’t “line up” with the actual UI drawn to the screen. It also breaks some system conventions like smooth cursor movement when holding spacebar on iOS’s keyboard. You can try it in Google Docs and see what I mean.

Those kinds of issues are actually why Lexical (FB’s new text editor toolkit) doesn’t use hidden input according to Lexical’s author trueadm on Twitter (can’t find my citation). Those same issues also make us hesitate to move that direction in Notion’s editor.

If you want to use a custom “layout engine” implemented on top of the DOM today, you can use Skia CanvasKit (https://skia.org/docs/user/modules/quickstart/) or Flutter Web which is based on Skia. Although CanvasKit is kinda slow and text looks bad on iOS.
> And what's really weird is how some new features rely on JavaScript, such as the newer <dialog> HTML element.

Compared to the older alert/confirm dialogue which was driven by a C++ browser window + JS boolean it kind of makes sense for <dialog> to use JS for such a thing and keep it within the HTML/stylable context. Like confirms the only place it will be used is within JS. So there's no separating the two really.

Unless you're just looking for a glorified HTML5 tag that you have to do yourself.
> No-no would want to listen to that.

Nobody would want to listen to made up stories? Nobody? Thousands of years of fiction would like a word.
It's certainly a lagging indicator for 1/N of the people at those schools.

For the other 1-(1/N), it's more like the "last" of the leading indicators – i.e. their last shot at a significant step change in career outcomes before beginning a career.

The ability to get a great technical education is more a function of who your parents are and how involved they want to be in your education than anything else, me thinks. "Top N schools" at any stage from pre-K to college is a lagging indicator of that.

What do you think the forest is?
I don’t think Wikipedia should be used to steer a decision. It just aggregates information on a topic.

Regarding drug use, it’s up to the parents. If the parents are unable to tolerate their child’s behavior, they’re more likely to accept giving their child drugs. If they’re on drugs themselves, they’ll be more likely to give them to their child. If they’re more “hands off” they’re more likely.

Is it better to have a wild, moody, potentially suicidal child or a baked potato? Some parents prefer the baked potato.
>Good quality news can make you understand what's going on in the world so you can be at the edge when you plan for your future.

Nicholas Nassim Taleb makes the point that this is largely a fallacy insofar as paying attention to news doesn't really help one predict the more important events; his extremely well informed friends were blindsided by the coup in Lebanon.

I do think it biases one toward believing that since they know what happened yesterday, they are better able to predict tomorrow, but I don't see that this is obviously the case.

> Not reading the news at all, can make you seriously misguided ... If you don't have any idea on what's going on in the grand scheme of things, your decisions and opinions are likely to be shortsighted.

I agree it can make you misguided, but I would also posit that paying too much attention to the news can also make you misguided. The news doesn't seem to me to pay all that much attention to the long-term and is very focused on recency (hence "new" in the name).

I know you have qualified with "may" and "can" and I think I agree with the possibility, but in my experience the actual effect is the opposite. I like to say that I enjoy _history_ but despise news; it's very hard to know what in the news will be important historically and it often misses the big events. The news told us Hillary would win the election against Trump, say.
Okay that explains the down votes. But it's naive to assume people will behave in a civilized manner when civil authority breaks down.

Water is a major issue. We have some bottled water in the garage, maybe enough for a couple of weeks or a month if used carefully.

We also have an underground stream that a pump drains about 5 gallons every 10 minutes to keep from flooding the basement. Unfortunately, it relies on the grid electricity. I'm not sure what would happen if it stopped for very long. If I could figure out a way to keep the pump going even during a prolonged outage, it would be an unlimited source of H20.

But for most people, water is going to be a show stopper, if the municipal pumps and filtration systems fail.
It's not about you.

It's about the person/company that signs the CLA. They're the ones that end up in potential legal nightmares, unless the CLA specifically promises to continue to indemnity.
"Just like 7 months ago, Twitter's network effect was constantly tested and many alternatives have tried to challenge it, but instead its users will still run back to using Twitter again, especially accounts with lots of followers."

Twitter is dramatically less relevant today than it was 7 months ago. Musk can post made-up stats claiming the most engagement ever [1], but across multiple industries the importance of Twitter has completely collapsed. In many cases it isn't being replaced by anything similar.

You are absolutely correct that there is a huge amount of stickiness. That's why Elon paid $44B for it. It would take some catastrophic mismanagement to truly kill the site, and Elon seems to be committed to doing that.

[1] Which will be intermixed with complaints about the bot problem, DDOS crawling, etc.
The problem is that the system design interview somehow became a necessary component of the FAANG hiring process.
Combined with the other changes that were also hastily and sloppily implemented and are now getting slowly rolled back, I think that strengthens the theory that Twitter was facing extreme capacity crunch and threw a whole bunch of slapstick measures to reduce traffic at the wall to keep their remaining servers from toppling over.
I work on a project at a large (although not Google-scale) company building a collaborative RTE.

The short is answer is no, there are very few universal truths about how text editing works. You'll experience differences between combinations of operating systems, input modes (Japanese IME for example), software keyboards on Android, languages (RTL languages) and that's just for text itself.

Then when you are thinking about more complex features simple things like "what happens when I double or triple click on this" are a complete crapshoot.
> The public have been sold a lie. Just like the “Patriot Act” was just to keep everybody free and protect people from terrorists.

The public have largely been sold nothing and are completely, blissfully, ignorant of this legislation. The legislation is being pushed through by politicians who have been sold two lies:

1. The legislation, and
2. the idea that the public care.
Because any attempt at moderation would be considered infringement on the first amendment and illegal by the US constitution. Social media is a cesspool without moderation.
Here's a few going back 270 years with a focus on electricity, enjoy.

* Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries
A Study of Early Modern Physics (1979)
https://archive.org/details/electricityin17t0000heil

* Early electrical communication (1964)
https://archive.org/details/earlyelectricalc0000marl

* Bibliographical history Of Electricity And Magnetism (1922)
https://archive.org/details/bibliographicalh033138mbp/page/n...

^ This is still one of the best.

* Electric Science Its History, Phenomena, and Applications (1853)
https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_Lks1AAAAMAAJ

* The History and Present State of Electricity (1769)
https://archive.org/details/historyandprese00priegoog
What do health organizations, like the NIH, AMA, and APA (or other, non-American organizations) have to say about antidepressants?

Similar to Wikipedia or divergent?
Let’s agree to disagree.

I am also not sure what “security” is being touched by TCP (and should be touched by that layer)? Performance could be better, but I’d say pick your battles. I prefer an “eternal” standard than turning everything upside down on a whim every generation for their incessant need to track everything you do and deliver as much ads to you in as little time as possible.

Encrypting everything by default on the lowest possible layer is batshit crazy. A sign of our times, not some fundamental technological leap forwards. In 100-200 years we will smack our collective foreheads.
You don't even need an extension. Open Developer Tools and find the appropriate option. For example in Chrome, there's a "Network Conditions" panel. Change to e.g "Googlebot" in the dropdown. Seems to work, at least for now.
because conservatives would cry "big government waste"
I don't know anything about Astro, but that graph reminded me of the Monty Python animation of Crelm toothpaste ... seems like Astro only provides 98% protection!

"Have you ever seen a hospital that doesn't have string?"
I’ve seen the word “activists” used in this manner to describe a certain type of person, who in my mind hardly qualifies as an activist. At most they are a person who follows the day to day of our political theater, but I doubt they could point to a single policy or proposal they actually advocated for in any political forum.

Coding behavior this way is misleading and counterproductive. Activism is a generally respectable activity, it entails actually showing up and giving your time towards something you care about, not just lecturing people about watching cable news.
Wow okay then the government (I know, the horror) would only need to work on the image issues and smoothing out the first steps. Or the trade schools need, or whoever cares about people getting a safe and very useful job - we all, I guess. (insert rant about traditional parties getting out of touch with such basic needs thus leaving room for extremists to grow)
It's also a master class in story telling, which you rarely see the context of a technical presentation.
I really struggle with this and honestly the days I get little done, I really wish I did, but often I just feel tired, unfocused, struggle to concentrate etc and then other times I am able to make myself sit down and pump out what I need to do.

I'm a more chaotic worker, I work in spurts, which can be horrible at work, currently on a project that is due at the end of the month, project manager wants updates at the end of the week to see where we are, basically expecting 25% a week, but to me life and things don't work like that, I will make sure we hit that target and do the hours towards the end that require it if we are off track, but for me it's never consistent, I would love for it to be that way, but i've kinda just realised that the world is chaos and I am chaos and I just try to mold things too that.

For me as well, usually it takes me a bit to fully understand something and then once I do, I tend to be able to get it done much quicker and it's simple to me, so i always tend to be much slower at the start than others as I am trying to figure it out, prodding and exploring the different options until I find what fits.

I feel like a lot of the world just isin't setup for how I work or how some people work, it seems it's better suited for early birds and highly organised people, rather than those of us that are introverted, night owls and distracted/work better in spurts.
Germany has enough storage capacity for natural gas to last a couple of months. The same can be build for Hydrogen. Some of the existing infrastructure can even be reused.
Node.js – v20.4.0
I've been sticking to reading https://text.npr.org/ and my local PBS/NPR-affiliate's local news coverage. Yes, both are biased and lean towards the liberal end of the news spectrum, but neither seems to push modern news shock and awe tactics nearly as evidently and I feel like I'm aware enough of what's going on locally and in the world to have decent conversations in social settings.

One nice thing about not fully comprehending what's going on in the news is that in social situations you can ask others lots of questions about current events and the people you're talking to will feel very proud that they can explain things to someone else. It's a good ice breaker, at least until it gets to be all political...
Vector storage is coming to Meilisearch to empower search through AI
There are too many IPv6 addresses for hoarding them to be a problem any time in the next few hundred thousand years, at least with the current deployment strategies. Currently it's recommended for ISPs to hand out a /32 to every ISP that requests one, and a /48 to every ISP customer (though residential ISPs will often only hand out /64s). But only the 2000::/3 IPv6 space is available, the remaining 7/8ths is reserved in case that allocation strategy is too liberal.
i was under the impression it wasnt confined. Even before the rayban/oakleys form factor, theres work to be done from a developer and app experiences perspective. Seems like that's the target demographic: Developers.