skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Below, I further frame the argument against the false-assertion that the government has free speech protections under the Constitution.

The government is specifically restricted by the Constitution in order to convey Rights to citizens.

Just as the FBI does not have Constitutionally protected free speech rights to request censorship of citizens, no matter how politely requested, the FBI can not legally "request of you" to report to prison for five years in the absence of being convicted of a crime.

As any such request carries the presumption of force.

This restriction protects the Constitutional Rights of citizens.

I can request that you report to prison. That is protected speech. I can request that speech be censored. That is protected speech.

Aside from my lack of power and potential force to be able to effect those outcomes, the Constitution also exists to protect individuals from my such requests should I, for instance, then drum up a mob (akin to a government) in order to try to intimidate or force results.

The government is not an individual with Constitutional Rights. It is the entity that the Constitution exists to protect individuals against.
Can you expand on the web server? Does it implement WSGI?
U.S. Intelligence Report Finds No Clear Evidence of Covid Origins in Wuhan Lab
Relying on commits also fails as soon as feature branches start being squashed. And the comments in commits can’t be modified over time. You have to hope readers “git blame” the correct lines of your code.

Just use comments.
If only it wasn’t Facebook as the owner, I’d be interested.
I've been a dedicated tea drinker since my teens, so this is great news.

OTOH what I worry about is oesophageal cancer. Not sure of the prevalence.
It is indeed the view held by most Americans. That is one of the fundamental differences between America and other countries. It is also one of the reasons that America is the country that the rest of the world aspires to be. There are plenty of socialist or even communist options in the world that espouse the ideals that you seem to align with. If you wish to live and benefit from American exceptionalism, then by all means put your hand at the till and direct your own ship in any way you desire. Because in America, if your smart and hardworking, the sky is the limit.
I am playing with the old versions of evernote from old version.com and it brings back so many memories and hopes of what the old web could one day become.

I changed the evernote web back to the classic version, and that also made me reminisce about the old days when I used to be more productive.

Those were the days.
… oops, unfortunately it doesn’t work. If I didn’t already have side projects coming out of my ears I’d go home and code a better trademark search up.
I don't know the specifics, but the license included with that code will specify what can and can't be done with it. ~~Not all open source is free to use in your own code base. Sometimes it is open sourced for review purposes.~~

Edited: the last line is incorrect.
The Zucc's shinanigans and backstabbing is so famous they made an award winning, and fan-favorite movie about it!
Yes, everything is a conspiracy
Is this not one of the primary advantages of federation and decentralized networks though? I think that there's a strong argument to be made that Everything networks have a deleterious effect on the collective human psyche because we're simply not designed to contemplate or accommodate so many radically different worldviews at once. Instead of creating societies with a strong emphasis on individual rights we exist in a pressure cooker of mental illness and anger amplified by algorithms that is pushing is closer and closer toward regulating one another out of existence.

Freedom of association is one of the most fundamental freedoms we have and democratic, free market societies can only flourish as long as we all agree to leave one another alone. You or I may not fully agree on the utility of say gay marriage or vaccines or religion or any number of cultural differences, but neither of us should be compelled to seriously entertain or fundamentally alter our way of being and thinking to please the other. This is how the old internet worked, the only reason we feel that it's impossible now is because we've been made to believe in totalizing systems of power that flatten and threaten to erase (by legal mandate or otherwise) different subcultures.
Americans have started buying pickup trucks en masse, and it's a total coincidence that it happens to have become the most profitable sector for car manufacturers and a sector they've turned all their marketing to. It's all the people who free-agencied their way to the same conclusion which just happens to agree with what the car makers want, and it didn't happen in Europe where the laws about emissions and safety don't exclude small pickup trucks, and that's also a total coincidence where millions of people just free-agencied their way to the same conclusion as each other (but different to Americans).

You know how jaywalkers are at fault when hit by a car? Who do you think spread that idea around America? "Automobile interests in the US took up the cause of labeling and scorning jaywalkers in the 1910s and early 1920s"[1]. And that isn't the case in other countries. People who saw the same marketing messages from the same people to believe the same things, who would think it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaywalking#Origin_of_the_term
> A reckoning is coming. You can't intentionally make an entire generation stupid and not feel the consequences eventually.

There are more things to learn today at school. They teach feelings for a start, that didnt happen in my day which perhaps explains why skills in computing are dropping. Not only that, people are no longer concerned with what part of town are they going to live in, settle down etc etc, now they consider what part of the world they want to live in. The constraints of family & school friends, region and country are being battered by globalisation which is mainly being driven by the internet.

Watching the BBC news, here in the UK and you could be forgiven for thinking the population in the rest of the world are just criminally insane terrorists, but thats what the UK press portray the rest of the world as to the British people.

I think they are using Project Fear to keep people here, in a desperate attempt to maintain GDP amongst other things.

So all in all, beside computing, today I know more about finance and biology than I would have ever learnt if I didnt have a job that gave me easy access to the internet, and the GP's hate me for it, when I have to deal with them, rattling off info is like a game of top trumps, until they lose and storm off!
But they only know what they have been spoon fed, look at Wimbledon champion Andrew Murray, if his nutritionists and the NHS were any good, he wouldn't be the only player with an artificial hip playing tennis at Wimbledon, and yet for some mad reason, people think thats a good thing and something to be proud of!

I'm sure the women who were portrayed in the Hollywood film Hidden Figures have probably lamented how the skills to land a man on the moon have been lost to mainframes, its a human trait to point out problems and then discuss them, but when will we be discussing these things with AI's and get credible advice back from the code?

Is it happening right now?
They have successfully submarined us into looking at the product page on Threads.com as a Slack alternative, while opining on whether this might be a trademark dispute around Meta's new thing with the same name.
We should invest more in public transit, but there is literally 100 years of built infrastructure which has fueled patterns of development which make taking transport unattractive. So we can invest more, just dont expect it to result in many fewer cars.
A lot of the posts I see seem to be re- or cross posts from other sites.
That is how i understood it. Then during install you’re promoted if you want to install additional software with probably a list that’s is the equivalent of today’s full install, easily selectable.
Very few autuers agree with you. They make blockbuster movies to finance the goodwill and pocketbooks of the films they want to make. This is why the critically "best" movies every year always go under the radar with relatively few ticket sales.

This is all to say, your opinion clearly isn't the universal one.
More demand for EVs will let EV automakers take advantage of economies of scale more and provides very clear incentives to resolve the battery shortage, either by finding and mining more lithium or finding alternatives.

Fewer EVs sounds like a very dumb idea.
Starting with Section 7 "the Plague Journal" on page 723 the single narrative splits into multiple streams on the same page, there are gaps in all of the streams, and finally on pages 831-32 there is this

"My life here more and more resembles a book whose opening chapters, whose title even, suggest mysteries to be resolved only at closing. But as one reads along, one becomes more and more suspicious that the author has lost the thread of his argument, or more upsetting, have so changed by the book's end that the
answers to initial questions will have become trivial."

It continues in this multi-stream format until page 869 and then ends ten pages later on 879 with sentence fragment "Waiting here, away from the terrifying weaponry, out of the halls of vapor and light, beyond holland and into the hills I have come to" At which point you remember it began with a sentence fragment "to wound the autumnal city." and realize that the book has wrapped on itself and will not reach a conclusion.

I am used to academic texts with footnotes and some how-to books with sidebars that provide details and examples from the primary flow, but this becomes a scrapbook that juxtaposes incongruous blocks of text. Sometimes I could tease out the connection but not always.

If your argument is that Ulysses or Finnegan's Wake are more complex then I agree. But I found Dhalgren much harder to follow or understand than the French existentialist novels (e.g. "The Flanders Road", "The Marquise went out at 5" or "Jealousy") that were stream of consciousness but maintained a consistent perspective
Cold War Conversations
oh, indeed! For me it was showing just a Threads logo when I had "enhanced tracking protection" enabled in Firefox. After disabling it, I can read the website fine. Thanks!
Show HN: Kullish – Find communities based on shared links on any Lemmy instance
I've done a Show HN for Kullish before; I'm resharing because I've pushed a major update which allows users to now also search across the Lemmyverse to surface communities that are discussing articles they find interesting.

I've written about how I previously used this tool to find niche subreddits.[1]

Here is an example of the kind of breadth returned when searching for a popular article.[2]

[1]: https://lgug2z.com/articles/finding-interesting-comments-dis...

[2]: https://kulli.sh/search?q=https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-t...
And yet underdeveloped countries are not doing much to ameliorate climate change.
Electrical bills come every three months. ALL electricity use is lumped together. So it's a bit hard to disect out what each usage-type is costing, unless you use one of those meters and study up average use over a period. Even then, some things like water heating and even aircons, are directly wired into the mains switchboard, so you would need an electrician to separate out those circuits for measuring. So it just doesn't happen.
This is intriguing but I don't quite follow - really naive, but:

isn't the final token as some position N?

And given context size limit Y, when we generate the next token, right now I get attention from N - Y to N?

And this supposes I get attention from 0 to N, but the attention decreases exponentially as we approach token 0?
> People should have the option to not depend on anyone or anything for transportation.

Yes, which is why it is a tragedy that we have built an environment in which it is straight up dangerous to walk or bike because of cars.
On-demand AVs will probably kill mass transit in the US. The poor will get the equivalent of EBT cards to ride, so there will be a social aspect to it. But framing it as some kind of Randian triumph ignores that there are places in the world where mass transit is very efficient because the cities are different. Private cars will be for the rich and should be taxed appropriately. Meeting your fellow citizen while riding an AV mini-bus will open your eyes to social diversity.
Remember when google was one of the “not evil” companies? When it comes to internet companies we have got burned so many times it’s good to keep a healthy dose of skepticism when it comes to a company that potentially decides if you are able to survive on the internet.
Make cities decent places to live, grow a family, and hang out instead of just workday commute destinations.
Range extenders should be something on a trailer you tow behind you, and which you can rent for a long-haul road trip. Whether that something is a 200KWh battery pack, or a gas/diesel based generator doesn't really matter.
"optional gas powered range extender"

Is this how we are re-branding internal combustion engines?
You'd probably be interested in the "Too Much Crypto" paper linked in the post: https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1492
What do you mean? Can you give examples?
What Microsoft does, Canonical will follow in the Linux realm? This does read like something Microsoft would do.
I think plenty have been burned by FB/IG. I'd have preferred to join bluesky but they're gating signups.

But agreed that it will do well-enough.
> between a E-bike and a super light weight car

Like, a e-scooter/motorcycle?
I see hundereds of them during my daily commute.
Costs around $3000, and about $20 in monthly charge costs.
There is. AI progress in the last 10 years was massive, and there is no end in sight. The risks are well established in countless essays. See e.g. https://yoshuabengio.org/2023/06/24/faq-on-catastrophic-ai-r...
I wonder though why did they use IG platform and not FB platform? Has FB platform grown so bad that it can't be used for implementing new things anymore?
The article points out that the Federal tax incentives played a large part in driving demand for EVs. I would like to take this opportunity to lambast those tax incentives as being really dumb. They are rebates, which means that only someone wealthy benefits, and they are pretty much all targeted at luxury vehicles. The lower/middle class driver being given incentive to purchase a much cheaper hybrid would have a much more pronounced effect on reducing emissions, than subsidizing EV sport cars does.

This article also fails to discuss the C02 emission cost that goes into producing the battery, which for an EV will probably never be recouped. At least for the lifetime of that vehicle.
The split is quite lumpy. At the aggregated level the state has a significant democratic majority. Geographically though I believe most of the counties are quite republican.
> Our heritage

Wow, that's quite the historical artifact. I can't get back into the headspace where people like PA thought they "owned" the concept of video games.
$10/user/mo sounds expensive. And the free option looks so tiny it's a non starter.
I think both Slack and Threads should be a little more generous with their free packages. Maybe like 5 users and unlimited history or self hosted but no support.
A Sure Fire Way to Get Promoted: Solve People's Problems
I'm not even sold on that interpretation either. There's a lot of externalities in the lithium battery industry that are being glossed over in most of those calculations. And gasoline can be made carbon-neutral through synthesis, using either solar or, ideally, waste heat from nuclear power to turn CO2 into gasoline. In that world a hybrid gets the best of both.

The main reason for wanting an all-electric future in my mind is the health benefits of not breathing in combustion byproducts every time you go outside. It's worth it for that.
In a civil case, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff. The plaintiff doesn't have to prove their case entirely, they only have to convince the judge (or jury) that the claim is "more likely than not" to be true. This is a lower level of proof than in a criminal case, where the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt".
It’s not even necessarily the program, but the nature of research. I liked my advisor a lot and he was helpful but at some point you need to figure out how to fly out of the nest and they can’t do it for you. During my dark period I ended up in an outpatient therapy program because my anxiety was so bad some days I wasn’t leaving my bed. My failure to figure out my problem at the time (even with a good advisor) had eradicated my self-esteem. I came in feeling a vocational calling to do research and I was just not getting anywhere with it.

The two comparisons I always made were a priest, who felt called by god to be a man of the cloth his whole life, losing his faith and the part in Moneyball where Brad Pitts character reflects on skipping college to sign a contract has a hot baseball prospect out of high school, yet being unable to succeed in the bigs.

Eventually, in conjunction with therapy and medication, I reached a critical mass of knowledge where I became, what I’d like to think at least, a good researcher. The process was just painful and I’m not sure how anyone could have made it easier.
I read a horror story on Slashdot about a user losing their Gmail account because of some issue on Google+ and that was it for me. I stayed away. My email account was too precious to risk.
When I read "Instagram app" I immediately think fine, so I could delete an ig app, right? Without deleting instagram?
TestFlight Now Supports VisionOS Apps
I love my ICE car. It has almost 200k miles and is still running strong. I will drive it until the engine dies, at which point I will convert it to fully electric.
it's not always as simple as that.
what if you once implemented some facade method to get data from database like "findProductById" and you comment it with "finds a product from database by it's ID". later on, someone (maybe you) replaced some deeper logic here, so the product might be fetched from some other source, depending on some configuration. in case you didn't even touch the facade file, will you remember to update the comment? most developers will not. this risk is ALWAYS present if the comment explains more than the nearby code. so a comment is only safe if it contains the same degree of information like the nearby code. in that case though the comment is redundant. comments only make sense if they explain the -why-, not the -what- or -how-.
Then lets not try anything. That's the alternative right?

If you see trying and failing is seen as a worse alternative to doing nothing and poisoning the environment we all live in then you need to take a step back, be less critical, and be okay with partial or incomplete solutions.

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.
What they've already sold may already be out there, true, but more importantly the ccpa gives you the right to opt out of future collection.

Shotgunning the request to the major players may not give 100% coverage, but I think it would at least reduce the amount of identifying information out there which seems like it would be better than status quo.

I'm curious if anyone has tried this at all.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle indeed says that we can only achieve a position uncertainty of delta x >= hbar / (2 * delta p). However, this is of course a lower limit on the uncertainty of the position, and hbar is extremely tiny. In practise, we have many other classical noise sources that limit us far before we can ever reach a point where we are Heisenberg-limited.

The noise due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle would only become "visible" when all of the classical noise sources are reduced such that the classical contribution to delta x * delta y is less than hbar / 2. I don't think this experiment reached such levels of precision
I think most of the PHEVs (at least in Europe) are hybrids that have a normal gas engine and a small electric engine.
That doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be easy to toss a hose through it without delaying the fire response.

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/work-van-full-debris-its-way...

Hydraulic cutters are slow AF and they're not going to remove bulk material that is in the way.
Google is limited - but I don't have to pay for it.

Grad school is laudable, but it's too damn expensive!

What's a person to do?

EDIT: Why did you delete your thoughtful reply 34wtg?

EDIT EDIT: https://archive.is/EWAOO
Musk has like 6 inches and 60lbs on Zuck
Same here. I have two old EVs. A Renault Twizy, 70km of range, which is really great for city driving (I even have a tow hitch on it in order to go to the recycling place), and a more "real" car: Hyundai Ioniq, 200km of range, which I use to go on road trips and the like. Yes, it takes more time, but hey, there's no maintenance, and I love that.
> That can be a pretty convenient tool.

It can, and it can also be accurate. We've a long history of demonstrating that morally right and what's legal aren't always identical concepts.
What are the most impactful and likely features that you'd like to see merged into CPython?
> We definitely want to investigate these and the billing issues further.
What’s a problem for OpenAI engineers to get web access logs and grep for 4xx/5xx errors?
That’s called a series hybrid and very few cars use that configuration. BMW i3 had a series hybrid version that was discontinued a few years ago, and there was the Chevy Volt (also discontinued).
MLOps platform focused on data scientists
Recently stumbled upon a platform similar to TestContainters but for ML Ops. Still in beta test (so it's almost free now) but looks promising.
Original GPT3.5 can do 4k tokens and there is a recent version with 16k tokens (gpt-3.5-turbo-16k)
Up until about 2010, this was basic user knowledge. That's like asking 'what's a web browser' which, ironically, in 1995 more people would have known what a drive was than a web browser.
Apple Vision Pro: The leap to spatial computing
Apple Vision Pro: not a VR or Metaverse headset, but instead a “Spatial Computer”
You're evaluating it for yourself, and that's normal, but there's a lot of diversity out there with vehicle needs and EVs have serious limitations for some use cases.
you can run it with the `npx` command if you didn't want to install it. another way, which is the one I'm using here, is via the VSCode plugin. enabling the "format on save" option with prettier as the default formatter will format any file it can, which is very handy!
It's not hacky though. SQLite explicitly supports VFS implementations, and it's in wide use throughout industry. All this does is use emscripten + asyncify to compile to javascript and then implements a vfs that calls into regular javascript calls. SQLite is notoriously well tested, and so if it says that the VFS works a certain way, it probably does.
Google+ was a product trying to break into a market where the market didn't really need another product. Threads is obviously looking to take up the mantle for where Twitter is dying, and people are actively looking for a Twitter replacement. So comparing Threads to G+ is just not a good comparison.
I mean they actively deleted the sequences from GenBank in an unprecedented way so that makes it harder to find clear evidence.
My god I’m way off base on costs then, I should appreciate my plan more - thank you for the context.
sounds reasonable TBH
> My issue is your claim the government has a monopoly on speech, not your other claims.

Ah gotcha, yeah maybe that's too strong of a premise. You can probably fix it by saying "potential monopoly" or something in the vein of "it would be easiest for the government to monopolize speech," as historically, freedom of the press was meant to counter or criticize strong central governments (e.g. monarchies).