skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you can give a specific example where you had trouble Googling for something, then I can try to help.
> require 26.8 million Level 1 and Level 2 ports at single-family homes, apartments and other locations

That’s the counts for Level 1 and 2 chargers. Level 1 chargers are “a regular outlet and a $150 EVSE”. Level 2 is “a larger outlet/breaker and a $500-750 EVSE”.

The projected $72B for that portion seems crazy high to me to be honest.
This has never happened to me on android.
If the gummy had whatever-it-is (Haribo no-sugar alternative), that may have been the issue, not the vitamin D molecule itself.
They truly and tangibly help somewhat but people give them too much credit.
Exactly this.

And it's not only about time: it's a hard skill to learn. Often, the simple solution won't occur to some engineers, no matter the time allotted.
That actually makes sense for produce because if it goes bad the container and product can be composted.

What I was thinking of is similar to wax coated paper cups.
Every single mechanism suggested (and has been used successfully in many other cities all over the world) to curb the trajectory SF is on is outright refused for either idealogical or political reasons. This is literally a problem of their own making.

If the state of California legalized FAFO to include lethal force for self-defense, a vast majority of these problems would go away overnight.
What’s animalistic sexuality look like
Also, mastodon just isn't easy like twitter/reddit/insta is. There's hurdles you have to get past. It's to the degree that, despite being the target demo for masto, I still haven't really gotten into it. Too many hoops. Even a flippin' bbs seems to make more sense at this point
Same principle for mountain biking. If you focus on the tree on the left and try to avoid it you end up clipping the tree on the right. You should be "aware" of the obstacles but you look ahead and focus on following the easiest line.
Apple is actually somewhat serious about privacy and security; PGP is much closer to the “performative” end of the privacy and security spectrum than to the “serious” end.
It changed a lot with fentanyl.
What a stupid stunt! As if those wanna-be-human-looking robots were anyhow representative, and as if their "thoughts" mattered or had even anything to do with robots. Clearly, at best their answers are generated from GPT, and what does GPT know about being a robot?

Purely sensational non-sense for robot haters.
Sometimes I think this is the point.

Like lately out cell service has been horrible at the house and my wife keeps asking me to call them but why? It's just going to be screaming into the void of some automated system and nothing will be done.
The Rob Pike quote is accurate and not condescending. If it bristles your feathers, I think that may have more to do with your ego than Rob pike.
We don't know the shape of the universe. There could be nothing further than what we observe. We, by definition, cannot actually know. The universe may simply wrap around itself. The universe may have finite real volume due to big bang inflation and it simply can't be approached

Fact is, far enough in the future inflation will be such that our view is vastly smaller than it is now. Their universe will be smaller because there will be no way for them to access what inflation has put beyond light and causality.
You don't need to predict the newest and hottest trend to make a startup. You just have to make customers happy. You can literally do any industry.
Sondek LP12-50: Jony Ive Designed a $60k Linn Record Player for Free
Did that happen more than once?
Two past submissions with comments:

* 07 Feb 2019: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19106796

* 24 May 2020: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23293835
I thought they were saying "Boo-urns".
"You decline the PhD offer and end up happy with an intellectually satisfying six-figure role in tech. You are surprised when you learn that your older colleague with a PhD earns just as much as you do."
They are based in Australia, though.
Idk about the rest of these but I don’t think 4 would work without ascii armor. Rfc 5322 limits the characters that can be in those headers.
> the complexity was always there, in the world

Essential complexity is exactly that. The entire game is to separate it from the accidental complexity. My career/life was revolutionized by a paper that is 100% focused on this very topic:

https://curtclifton.net/papers/MoseleyMarks06a.pdf

The solution to eliminating accidental complexity is ultimately presented as a flavor of relational model, which I simply read as "please just use SQL for most things". This perspective has served me exceptionally well over the last ~4 years now.

A quote I like from Chapter 8:

> The relational model [Cod70] has — despite its origins — nothing intrinsically to
do with databases. Rather it is an elegant approach to structuring data, a means for manipulating such data, and a mechanism for maintaining integrity and consistency of state. These features are applicable to state and data in any context.

Chapter 9 offers an actual proposed solution - Functional Relational Programming.

At the end of the day, suffering in a cesspit of complexity is a choice. The relational model is the answer for untangling highly-complex (aka high-dimensional) problem domains, especially ones that require arbitrary downstream views of the data. The central piece of magic with the relational model (as applied to the real world) is the query planner. You should start thinking of this as an actual code-writing super AI that can answer optimization questions 1000x faster than your best developers. All you have to do is give it a tiny pile of hints to work with, and almost any arbitrary request will be satisfied in a nearly-ideal amount of time.
The headline isn't very informative. Tldr the case revolves around whether a thumbs up emoji constitutes acceptance of a contract.
All emails are basically signed these days via DKIM by your mail service. Each server along the chain should also be signing them too, so your whole path is known and validated. You can validate those keys via DNS.

True story, I was an expert witness on a case once where I showed how the other guys were submitting forged emails into evidence -- by using DKIM signatures/hashes. That was probably some of the most fun I've ever had.
Recently had a Windows update break my work computer. Everything seemed fine until trying to run a Windows Service in Virtual Box with the HOST OS being Windows 10 IoT in RTOS mode. The attempt to start the service create an infinite loop. Uninstalling nor re-installing the Windows updates fixed the issue. Took a month to convince IT to re-install Windows from fresh to fix the issue.

The second most recent was when Windows Store local repository become broken. Any attempt at resolving the issue failed using Windows provided tools. Yet again had to reinstall the OS and all applications.

This is the big reason why I prefer Linux over Windows any day of the week. Windows fix always seems to be the same, re-install OS and applications. Never had a problematic Linux installation that couldn't be resolved with a live CD / USB. Boot into live USB, mount encrypted partitions, chroot into environment, fix problematic package(s) or re-edit configuration files, reboot. No need to reinstall the OS and all applications.

Linux packaging system(s) are heaven compared to the Windows update hell-scale. Ever have to find a way to update the Root Certificates in order to install .NET Framework 4.7.2 offline on Windows 7 Embedded SP1 that is air gaped and has not had an update since the computers were shipped? Not fun.
interesting; curious - What is the thing you hate the most here?

FWIW, I've been a kind of sysadmins for couple of decades, then ops manager for 5. After supporting multiple production streams, good and organized and consistent processes are an absolute must for me (as opposed to random wild west and utter chaos sometimes we techie prefer :-)). It is my understanding "premise of function they support" is organized work flows - standard and "let's not reinvent the wheel badly" ways to manage and report on incidents, service requests, etc. And hopefully do some trends and reporting and categories and whatnots.

So I don't know if service now does that well or poorly... But what in there do you "loathe"?? It may not be your cup of tea and you'd rather develop freely, and fair enough, but somebody somewhere has to support large productions and large numbers of users and need tools better than slack and emails to do it... :-/
> I just freakin said who. That is very specific. What are you looking for me to name Jessica, former content lead at AcmeCorp?

How about a company or an article?

> But you are missing my point. This stuff is beginning to happen.

I'm not, you're missing mine. You believe they are beginning to happen. But you tell me they haven't happened yet. There is nothing substantive to justify this fear. History certainly doesn't. That's my point.

> Since you're so damn optimistic about the future, what are these jobs that these people will be retraining to? That don't exist yet.

Imagine that, the future creating new jobs for people. Not as if that has ever happened before. We're all still toiling in the fields aren't we.
I find the assumptions of the economic analysis I have seem pretty dubious. They assume way too much linearity and fungibility in the system that just doesn't appear to be there.

We are just going to keep kicking the pendulum until it transitions out of its nice linear region.
Money No Enough, Passion Needed Too: Restoring Classic Singaporean Films
What you’re calling narcissistic is nothing more than taking as a given that an observer can’t go faster than the speed of light.
Portugal was previously (1990s) spending money on police, courts, and jails. They had shifted the resources, and it had seemed to be successful until something changed in the past few years.
Facebook have released a bunch of good-quality open-source libraries and tools. Not just zstd, rocksdb, folly, flow, hhvm and other niche things, but also PyTorch and React, staples of two industries.

Since they are honestly open source, they have been inspected a lot, and, if they included any data siphoning, that would be long known, and long since deleted.

I don't share your skepticism.
(1) doesn’t preserve sender identity: the receiver is stripping the original signature and/or ciphertext, meaning that B’s forwarding of A’s email to C is not verifiable with A as the original sending identity. Depending on the context, this either doesn’t matter or makes the entire scheme useless.

(2) and (3) have similar problems.

(4) is a TOFU-ish scheme, meaning that it’s trivial for an adversary on the wire to replace the keys.

(5) doesn’t work, full stop. E-mail wasn’t designed with encrypted headers in mind. Trying to shoehorn these things together leads to all kinds of weird misplaced user assumptions around what is signed or not, etc.
'Red Hat's open source rot' = they are no longer giving non-customers the RHEL sources for free, something that is completely within their right under the GPL, but it means I no longer benefit from those great free security and other patches republished by the rebuilders after stripping out the RHEL trademarks, so it's inconvenient for me.
Honda has moved down their rankings due to reliability problems with their infotainment systems. Lumping transmission failure at 50,000 miles with some audio system breaking is too coarse.
Well the performance increase is so huge because pydantic1 is really really slow. And for using rust, I'd have expected more tbh…

I've been benchmarking pydantic v2 against typedload (which I write) and despite the rust, it still manages to be slower than pure python in some benchmarks.

The ones on the website are still about comparing to v1 because v2 was not out yet at the time of the last release.

pydantic's author will refuse to benchmark any library that is faster (https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/3264 https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/1525 https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/pull/1810) and keep boasting about amazing performances.

On pypy, v2 beta was really really really slow.
> The advice that you should "always buy the biggest home you can afford" is often perversely accurate, especially if you believe property values will keep going up.

Ehhhhhhhh too much of that return goes straight to Consumption instead of your bank account. If we’re going for Max Returns, buy the biggest home you can… and rent it out as you live in a shoebox. ;)

(Or buy smaller homes, to diversify.)
Literally everyone opposes rape.
Considering implementing AbstractPatternConfigFactoryBuilderFactoryConfigPatternAbstract. Just to see if anyone notices.
I did mean that I apologize for the missed }.

I haven't had much luck slot of the time it just adds a comment saying "rest of tests here" which is annoying.

I have had good success with it generating things like JSDOC/doc strings and sending git diff and asking it to create a "developer friendly summary for use in a pull request description"

This has definitely increased my work output
Yes. With a paid subscriber base and no advertising their interests would be aligned with the reader's. If you're not paying for the review they will ultimately build loyalty toward their funders.
Cars aren’t hypothetical. They’re real. You are deliberately misunderstanding and exaggerating my point to prove, well, I don’t even know what you’re trying to prove.

First, my point is about optimising for happiness. Running out onto a road without thinking has nothing to do with happiness.

Secondly, the risk profile between these two scenarios is completely different. In one, the OP _might_ have a slight difficulty in finding employment in the future (we actually don’t know, because there are so many variables). In the other, the OP is likely to be dead or seriously injured (which is something we actually know). These scenarios are not comparable.
Good? You seem to be implying that's a worse thing than wherever Proton Mail is based, but haven't stated why.
Denys Fisher
> We could all get more time off, for example.

The average person active on HN could do this. They could move somewhere with extremely low cost of living and work a remote job. But almost nobody does this. Instead people choose to live in incredibly high cost areas at well paid jobs, chasing ever higher quality of life.

It's not some boogeyman forcing this. It's just human nature.
It was fine in 2014. It has changed radically since then.
“Planned Parenthood Federation of America honored the Pearl of Africa, a unique documentary from the inside of the Ugandan LGBT movement.”

https://archive.is/BNBWP
Perhaps we should give ground zero of tech culture more of a chance. But it is pretty shameful how the anarcho-libertarian crowd is so bent on authoritarian means when they have to face the realities they birth.

Strange days, William Gibson fans wanting Walt Disney World.
Fastmail + 1password also has this feature.
Is that a negative?

I guess the redback spiders do make nests in the server-racks sometimes.
It wouldn't suprise me if Lucasfilm pre-Disney may have intended to use 4 to hand things off to Shia LeBeouf, but, well, whoops.

The Bond model is an interesting one, I wonder how well it would work for Indiana Jones. First I guess you gotta decide if you are gonna bring it forward in time or not. If you do, I think there's something of a bad guy problem. Raiders and Last Crusade both benefited a lot from the Nazis being on the other side of things. Keeping that scale + keeping the focus on archeological finds vs whatever Bond McGuffin can be imagined seems a hard job to me... And if you leave it set in the WWII era... there's only so much you can plow that land too.

And once you're 30 years after major media relevance, recasting your hero is a highly risky move. Does Indiana Jones without Harrison Ford have more pull? Or even less? (Compare to, say, Uncharted, which opened to less money than Dial of Destiny, but was cheaper to make at least).

(Of course, "highly risky move" also has to include spending $300M to make a new entry after that long... so... whoops again)
How come self hosting email is such a pain in the ass? I use Proton, its okay, I feel better about it vs Gmail/Gsuite, but its no where as good, feature wise. If I could self-host email, I'd feel good about my tool stack, but I simply don't know enough about the protocols, web/mobile clients, managing network and in/outbound issues, I give up before seriously considering.
Exactly, I completely agree, it's a very silly thought! What makes drug use different from my example that people aren't able to have an informed opinion on it when they're involved?
I have some thoughts on this also. The main thing is that tech debt does not capture the ongoing costs – you only pay interest when there is a principal, and for all debt, you can pay the principal off.

https://www.madsbuch.com/tech-debt-tax/
There is research being promoted by the other side of the debate too... Unfortunately, once a scientific issue becomes politicised, it’s hard to know who can be trusted.
It's remarkable that they still exist as a functioning company. I would have thought that the lawsuits over the hack, the alleged fake accounts, and the general loss of customer trust would have been enough to push them into insolvency.
Imagine that board meeting
If you're under 50k in the US healthcare is literally free. What country do you live in? Have you ever visited healthcare.gov?
Your get an extra $400/child/month at that income. If you're Mexican and you're weighing working in Mexico, you should absolutely go file and then go to the doctor and get your head checked.
Sounds like you're blaming this all on the gays?
Racism? Really?

So, execution for drug use in Malaysia has a root cause of racism.

This just goes to show you that these people have absolutely no intellectual rigor applied to any of their ideas.

Their fake ideology is built strictly on a convoluted set of shibboleths that apply only loosely as semi-believable just so stories in a Western (specifically American) context.
I never got the factory thing. I just put the object creation logic in the object itself as static methods.

For example here: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/design_pattern/factory_patter...

I'd just have a static Shape.getOfType()

Or maybe ShapeType.toShape() for type safety instead of using strings for the type.

It's okay, I'll brace for the down votes. :)
> fancy text editors like EMACS.

Them fighting words my friend.
Well, Harrison Ford is literally 80 years old. I think Indiana Jones is about 80 in the latest movie as well. Complaining that a *gasp* woman could beat up an octogenarian is more of a commentary about you than the inevitable march of time.
A “violent criminal” who had never hurt anyone or been convicted of a crime? Whatever you say, man. It’s pretty clear what you’re doing here. We’re not going to be able to agree, so I’m ducking out.
Yes it was incredibly slow and inefficient.

I maintain typedload (a similar project, that I started before pydantic's first release) and pydantic 2 somehow still manages to be slower than a pure python library that got no funding to improve performances.
Define, please, "family values".
For an earlier example of a related vibe, I recommend checking out sicp: https://web.mit.edu/6.001/6.037/sicp.pdf#page29
Yep, me too. However legislation on x (be it rape, recreational drugs, whatever), still requires discussion, and there's always ifs and buts, and the idea that someone involved in x is somehow not someone to be taken seriously on the matter strikes me as wrong.
I'm also self-hosting on a different domain. The actual software stack is easy. It's dealing with the blacklists that's hard -- I submitted a ticket to spamhaus, but of course there's been no response after weeks. I guess I have to figure out how to tuck a $50 bill into an email if I really want to get off that list...
The carpenter doesn't need a degree. The architect and structural engineer do.

If you plan to be a programmer all your life, and a journey-man one at that, then feel free to learn-programming-in-21-days.

If you're planning a career in software, then I think understanding fundamentals (database normalisation, the Order of a solution, the ideas of Coupling and Uncoupling, memory usage versus performance, the impact of CPU cache, multi-threading safely, operating system task priorities, compilers, and a good few more things that underpin the science behind building software, then a degree is helpful.

Not because of the books, you can get those at home, but because of the structure (ie the path through the carriculim) the mentorship from professors, TAs and so on, and most of all the exposure to your peers - the wonder of collectively pushing each other to explore beyond the curriculum, beyond just this week's assignment.

Most of all it teaches intellectual curiosity- that spark some people have to see something in code they don't recognise, understand the novelty of it, and go and find out about it. It's easy to keep up because you have the structural foundations to absorb new things all the time.

ChatGPT can't do the things I do, and even calling it ChatGPT is a shallow understanding of why not. Broadly speaking LLMs are a tool I can use to learn new things, which is great, it knows how to weild many kinds of hammer. But it doesn't understand the nuance and context of building a whole building. One which has never been built before.

Precisely because LLMs are good at regurgitating the past, but understand literally nothing, they only replace programmers who are good at regurgitating the past (writing code) but understand very little about what that code -means- (as distinct from what it -does-)

Of course each College is different, and YMMV, but if you gave the time, and resources, and opportunity to do a formal degree, then I think it worth it in the long run. But like most things in life you get out what you put in. The curriculum is just the hint of a starting point to what you learn there, don't go to "be taught", go to suck the marrow from each moment, to actively "learn" from the challenges you set yourself.
> I claim a society where the cops can shoot an unarmed young man in the face with no repercussions is an unsafe society

Then you aren't talking about this case. This man was driving his weapon and had already risked the lives of pedestrians and other drivers before he was stopped.

> Society's checks and balances breaking down so far

The breakdown of society is that the driver, a known criminal, was out on the street. If he'd been arrested, charged, and jailed as he should have been he wouldn't have been able to risk his and other lives.

He was literally a danger to himself and others.
And yet the audience reaction to that has been largely positive - both in aggregate and in the theater I was in - it's the critics that have been more sour compared to how they reacted to Crystal Skull (while the audience disliked that one much more).

If you wanna say "don't make a movie about an old version of that character," fine. But give it a fucking break with the idea that the filmmakers are attacking you by showing that an 80 year old version of the character wouldn't be the same as a 40 year old version.

Let's remember that the last successful film in the franchise made EXCELLENT use of aging and the effect of that on the character's relationships with a great premise and execution by Ford and Connery, too. We were already getting to peek beyond just "here's Indy again doing Indy things"
You can't save every human life.
OTOH, if you build a framework/library, you might be able to use AI to generate thousands of examples of using your framework/library, then publish those examples. If it's too difficult for the AI to generate correct examples, then that may be a sign of what parts would also be difficult for humans.

We may in fact see an explosion of new frameworks and libraries that use this strategy.