skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If this were true, I'd expect this HTML:

<p>A<br B</p>
<p>C</p>

To render as this:

A
B
C

But instead it renders as this:

A
C

The parser treats `B<` and `p` as attributes of `br`, and determines that the `<br` tag ends with the `>` at the end of line 1.

If I end the `<br` with either `/>` or `>`, it parses correctly. Which means that `/>` and `>` are both considered valid endings for the `<br` tag, but you have to have one or the other and it will keep looking until it finds one.
Location: Denver Colorado

Remote: OK

Willing to relocate: Depends on Location

Technologies: JavaScript, Php, MySQL, Vue, React, Docker, AWS, GCP

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vlad-solokha/

Email: vsolokha@gmail.com
Because the choice was ultimately made by company staff, not government employees

Giving the government a special, higher priority reviewed support queue isn't illegal, as long as the company is acting with independence.
Why? Photos in public are First Amendment protected.

You can just think things are creepy without being a crime
Even memory ordering guarantees within sector boundaries are sufficient, and something the kernel could provide on its own.
Why is the developer responsible for UI design?

I certainly think developers should be involved in UI design, but I don't think they should be the main decision makers in most cases, precisely because "putting both a really clever design and a really stupid user into your head at the same time is very challenging," and I wouldn't expect it to necessarily correlate with programming skill.
Holding on to the best explanation until they find a better one, you mean? Yes, of course they are
>Hamilton viewed the General Welfare to be more expansive

So you acknowledge that your original statement was wrong, and that the general welfare statement even at that time was considered more expansive by some of the founding fathers than the Federalist paper you quoted argued?
Precisely. The use of the emoji was tangential to the evidence that contracts between these two parties had previously been negotiated via text messages.

> "The Court of King's Bench decision said a grain buyer with South West Terminal sent a text to farmers in March 2021 saying that the company was looking to buy 86 tonnes of flax for $17 per bushel to be delivered in the fall."

> "The buyer, Kent Mickleborough, later spoke with Swift Current farmer Chris Achter on the phone and texted a picture of a contract to deliver the flax in November, adding 'please confirm flax contract.'"

It's not like the court determined a thumbs-up emoji is now equivalent to a witnessed signature or anything.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/block-website... works for me. Of course there are similar extensions out there.
the inode is the important thing when all is said and done. It is flexible in that it can contain all the metadata needed to present a file to a process. Sometimes that metadata is a list of blocks in the filesystem. sometimes it points to another inode.

I think of it like an old-timey 'card catalog'. You have a bunch of tiny drawers filled with cards. Some of the cards are big and blank spacers with a prominent tab sticking above the normal top edges (Directory). Sometimes you have a card that points to another card elsewhere in the catalog (link). Sometimes you find the details of a specific book on a specific shelf (block data).

Point is, they are all cards. The comment essentially asked for a command to say 'how many cards between these two spacers'. It's a "trick" question as old as usenet to spring the distinction between link inodes and list of blocks inodes and say "Ah-HAH!! gotcha", but in reality it's a silly game of jumping levels, misdirecting semantics and prey upon the distribution of understanding in a forum for personal glory.

The inode is the item, it is the card that is being counted, no matter what is printed on it. imho.
Hmm, I suppose that the jury isn't out yet would imply that the trial is ongoing.
Consider me ignorant, how would you "interpret" the narrative in a way that is compatible with modern science?
To be fair there are definitely cases where an increase an income means you lose particular benefits and end up being worse off. But yes, it's scary how many people don't really understand marginal tax rates.
Depending on your use case, there are major quality differences between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
The headline suggests Musk is spiteful. This is disingenuous. If you read the actual letter it alleges Meta is illegally obtaining trade secrets and confidential documents retained by those employees to build the competing Twitter clone.
Yes. If somebody can login to a machine which they shouldn’t, local exploits are least of our concerns, because this means we have bigger failures in many layers up to that point.
Code completion/assistance is an order of magnitude better in GPT4.
How does macOS Ventura check the security of known apps and command tools?
Its the older completion models, not the older chat completion models.
The spec doesn't address line wrapping in editors: https://spec.commonmark.org/0.30/#indented-code-blocks

I imagine you could open a Github issue or even submit a PR if you don't like how a certain editor does word wrapping in Markdown lists. Personally I am not concerned with this detail.
"Likely" means more than "possible" and less than "probable", with a pretty hefty error bar given the trial hasn't happened yet. It's a far cry from the settled state the original headline implied.
I dont think you appreciate the threat scenario discussed here if you think its reasonable to ask for personal experience. Leaves me to wonder if i am supposed to deny having committed any crimes while we are at it?

Still thank you for the response, gives the ability to clarify that this is by no means an advertisement. You have of course endless options for ddos mitigation right now. But once cloudflare no longer wants you, your other options have a tendency to evaporate as well.
With this is the death of any uncensored usage of their models. Davinci 3 is the most powerful model where you can generate any content by instructing it via the completions API - chat GPT 3 models will not obey requests for censored or adult content.
Does anyone have recommendations for under-the-sink water filtration systems?
But the Court is not muzzling the government in the sense of prohibiting their public message. The court is enjoining their method of influencing public debate - that they were/are preventing what you say from being published based on its content.

Prohibiting unlawful orders is not an abridgment of an authority’s “free speech”.
From the article:

> This means that swearing will not automatically improve the quality of your code.
Saving you a click: despite what the repo title might suggest, while the code is open source, the model weights cannot be used commercially without permission.

> The code in this repository is open-source under the Apache-2.0 license. The InternLM weights are fully open for academic research and also allow commercial use with written permission from the official team. For inquiries about commercial licenses and collaborations, please contact internlm@pjlab.org.cn.

https://github.com/InternLM/InternLM#open-source-license
I have a startup of legal AI, the quality jump from GPT3.5 to GPT4 in this domain is straight mind-blowing, GPT3.5 in comparison is useless. But I see how in more conversational settings GPT3.5 can provide more appealing performance/price.
I don't know. On the one hand there's the idea that humanity should be left to take it's organic path. The machine can't know that guy's grievances. Do we really want to be kept as pets? Or is it just another tool being used to protect people? I guess it really depends on the role it plays in the social structure directly.
Mental illness. A big chunk of people on Twitter are not well up top. Normal people go to the bar to watch baseball or play boardgames or something.

It's not normal to be a Krassenstein or a BrooklynDadDefiant or whatever - those people are nuts.
Sure, but the Trinity isn’t multiple gods.
only if you imagine taxes are good. Suppose the rate was higher and business responded by lowering profits such that the absolute tax revenue was lower? is that good or bad?
I am building an extensive LLM-powered app, and had a chance to compare the two using the API. Empirically, I have found 3.5 to be fairly unusable for the app's use case. How are you evaluating the two models?
"-cide" is a suffix that means "to kill," as in:

* suicide
* regicide
* fratricide
* insecticide
* pesticide

It comes from the Latin word "caedo," which means "to kill." The phrase "cultural genocide" is not the same as "genocide," and indeed the legal definition of "genocide" expliticly says that destruction of a culture is not genocide.

Using the word "genocide" to refer to something other than mass murder - and then falling back to the claim that "genocide" doesn't mean mass murder - is just playing rhetorical games.
Yup. I’m not catholic anymore but it’s what I was taught too.
Leaving the company intact is dangerous. The company culture that permitted these acts won't necessarily be wiped out when you purge the executives but leave the rest of management intact.
This is cool, thanks for linking
It wouldn't need to require an extra year. The courses available in that first year could be general courses which apply to all majors.
I'm saying Bread + topping is not inherently a pizza. There are lots of other dishes that are bread + topping that we don't call pizza.

Is crostini a pizza? Is bruschetta? Is sabich? Is lahmacun? Arepas? Is an open face bagel with cream cheese?
Most likely a reverse proxy of some sort.
It’s really important - and people seem to be unwilling to recognize - the huge amount of work done by browser vendors 10-15 years ago to actually make the specs usable for the purpose of implementing a browser (the whatwg work and es3.1 were all about actually building out correct and complete.

The w3c specs, and similar era es specs could not be used to implement a browser, and a lot of the browser engineering work of the time was basically trying to find site breakage and then reverse engineering whatever gecko and/or trident did. It meant things that today might take just a few hours to implement by following the spec could take weeks. At one point I spent a month working out what the correct behaviour and sequence of events should be fired when pressing keys on a keyboard because what the specs said both under specified what should happen, and also was just wrong in some edge cases. It was a truly miserable era, and the people who seem hellbent on bashing whatwg and what not for some perceived slight remain absurd to me.
Elmo can use all the money he saved by firing critical staff and not paying rent in four cities.
And yet CEOs routinely click on the most basic of phishing emails. Maybe they don't teach media literacy in business school.
In North America, the Genesis was actually more popular than the SNES until near the tail end of the 16-bit era - 1994 or so. By that point the Genny's paltry colour palette (64 on-screen 9-bit colours) was starting to look really dated - not just next to the new 32-bit consoles but even next to the SNES, as devs started to learn how to make it sing (see: Donkey Kong Country). And the bungling of the Sega CD and especially the 32X really did a number on their brand. When all is said and done they ended up pretty much neck-and-neck, with Nintendo pulling ahead a little bit, but any way you slice it, with 18M units sold in NA, the Genesis was an enormously successful product.

The late arrival of the N64 did little to hurt the Playstation, so you can't pin Sega's failure on Nintendo's delays.

In Europe, the Genesis (and Master System!) were even bigger than they were in North America, but the Saturn still bombed and Sony still ruled the next gen.

In Japan, the Saturn was actually quite successful - more popular than the N64 actually - whereas Sega's previous systems never really caught on. But, again, it still lived in the shadow of the mighty Playstation.

And, as a nit: the Saturn wasn't backwards compatible. The Genesis was, but no one outside of Europe and Brazil cared about the Master System.
Why did you need the Java wrapper? You can orchestrate stuff like that within Python. The multiprocessing module.
My experience is that GPT-3.5 is not better or even nearly as good as GPT-4. Will it work for most use cases? Probably, yes. But GPT-3.5 effectively ignores instructions much more often than GPT-4 and I've found it far far easier to trip up with things as simple as trailing spaces; it will sometimes exhibit really odd behavior like spelling out individual letters when you give it large amounts of text with missing grammar/punctuation to rewrite. Doesn't seem to matter how I setup the system prompt. I've yet to see GPT-4 do truly strange things like that.
That is less convenient, which means you will do it less, and reserve your energy for only the closest friends. I don't send personal emails to anyone and I don't receive any either. Email is all transactional. Calling is even more limiting because you have to take into consideration the other person's hours. On the other hand performing these costly signals builds ties so you have a point too. I have been trying to schedule a physical meeting with a friend for a while and something always comes up.
Goal posts moved. I don't know anything about bullying - if that’s going on, prosecute that for what it is. Sounds like a possible law enforcement issue that needs to be investigated. I’ve worked at enough tech companies to know I don't want them trying to handle it. Freedom of speech is about protecting ideas you may hate and find utterly horrible.

And a big middle finger to you for that last dig there. My family fought in the American Revolution - worked for ourselves then and still do now.
These aren't photos but collection of PII which is then sold. If I took a photo of you walking your dog and posted it to Instagram that's not even remotely the same as writing down your license plate number and selling it to someone wanting to track you.
Agreed, that's the problem eod. Was trying to set up an instance a few days ago and the docs for it hadn't been updated since '21
Thanks, that's really helpful
Has anyone been able to come up with a way to keep track of GPT-4 performance over time? I'm told that the API is explicit about changes to models and that the Chat interface is not.
maybe you have to go to settings > beta features and enable plugins?
And how do you know the resource doesn't exist in this case? The server says it does.

The point is, "resource" is an abstraction that servers may implement as they wish. The only requirements, per HTTP, is that (1) it's something that can be identified with a URI (satisfied in this case), and (2) it has information associated with it that can be retrieved and/or managed via the HTTP protocol (satisfied in this case).

We might imagine that the set of resources should be finite, or strictly mapped to extant data records in our system – but these are not requirements.
Mind telling me how it's clear that I dislike corporations?

I'll proudly admit I have no trust in corporations, but dislike is a little far. There's corporations I like but there's no corporations I trust.
There is a app for that too, which works off of a photo of your parts: https://brickit.app/
> I don't think you've any basis to claim that it must do anything in particular.

The relevant part of the spec says that returning a 4XX code is a SHOULD [0] not a MUST. That means:

> This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course [1]

[0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-client-erro...

[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119

So yes, there is no requirement to return a 4XX message, but you should think carefully and understand the consequences of not doing so.

One consequence is creating false positives in most vulnerability scanners.

Another consequence is potentially messing up various crawlers, including those that help search engines index your content.
It has been long established in case law that government requests for censorship are tantamount to coercion and threats.

To wit, it matters not if the Giant makes a polite or directly threatening request of Jack. In either case, Jack is right to assume that he has no choice in the matter. And can not be expected to tell the Giant to "pound sand". Conversely, the Giant should not be able to claim that Jack had a choice.

The government has no business asking any entity, which it does not fund, to remove speech in the United States.
My kids never want to build the instruction versions, they only want to make their own designs.
You mean something closer to every short-ranged EV with BEVs, and long ranged ones with FCEVs? That could work, although it would be admitting that most cars will be FCEVs. Though honestly, we'd be better off with more mass transit than short-ranged vehicles.

Hydrogen is not unstable for transportation purposes. It is safer than gasoline.

No. Wells to wheels efficiency, at least for large installations, would be not far off from what is possible with batteries. The fact that you even think that FCEVs are even close to ICE on efficiency shows that you've swallowed a lot of BEV propaganda. A fuel cell is 3x the efficiency of a conventional gasoline engine. BEVs simply are not that much efficient, and the gap continuously shrink.
Because they called it pizza and modern pizza is a direct descendant of it.
Hmm, when I try to change model name to "gpt-4" I get the "The model: `gpt-4` does not exist" error message. We are an API developer with a history of successful payments.. is there anything we need to do on our side to enable this, anyone know?
This is very nice.

GPT-4 is on a completely different level of consistency and actually listening to your system prompt than chagpt-3.5. It trails off much more rarely.

If only it wasn't so slow/expensive... (it really starts to hurt with large token counts).
Is Meta preventing any other entities from releasing their own Twitter? Nobody's forcing people to use Threads.
But there's still no way to get an LLM to only output "fact", because that's not a property of language.
Outside of the headline, there is some major stuff hiding in here:
- new gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct model expected "in the coming weeks"
- fine tuning of 3.5 and 4 expected this year

I am especially interested in gpt-3.5-turbo-instruct, as I think that the hype surrounding ChatGPT and "conversational LLMs" has sucked a lot of air out of what is possible with general instruct models. Being able to fine tune it will be phenomenal as well.
I read it differently before, but I think you read it correctly.
No wonder people have to park in front of the hydrant there, there is absolutely no parking on that street
Why bother setting fucks_given if you're exiting?

mmm

/embeddedme says it could be a memory-mapped peripheral that needs to be reset on exit. But that's a stretch.

Why am I even thinking about this?
We could always keep the company and fry the shareholders and executives responsible. If there ever were a company the nation couldn't do without, the only sane answer is for the government to take it over for national security reasons. Otherwise that company could hold the US hostage, or be bought out/taken over by foreign interests and used to collapse the entire country while we'd be powerless to stop it.
PyRGG 1.4 Released: Random Graph Generator (+ Config File Support)
Who got kicked off of Cloudflare? Because both the cases I can think of weren't because of governments and were the sorts of schmucks that you really don't want hanging around.
They're deprecating all the completion/edit models.

The chat models constantly argue with you on certain tasks and are highly opinionated. A completion API was a lot more flexible and "vanilla" about a wide variety of tasks, you could start a thought, or a task, and truly have it complete it.

The chat API doesn't complete, it responds (I mean of course internally it completes, but completes a response, rather than a continuation).

I find this a big step back, I hope the competition steps in to fill the gaps OpenAI keeps opening.
Plus when people do take the time to thoroughly refute misinformation, it's getting easier and easier to drown out any signal that starts spreading with a cacophony of noise from bots.
In this context: forcing a choice in activities between one option or other when both are meaningful to a person. That's not to say you should never abandon activities, only that folks tend to over-do it.

Some resources you might find useful

[1] https://www.artofmanliness.com/skills/how-to/weekly-plan/

[2] Todoist/Trello are great for kanban tasks lists for the must-get-dones

[3] Set reasonable goals and milestones -- and be honest with yourself! (see 1)

[4] For larger targets, https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/strategic-planning-kit/...

Planning this way has hallmarks of Agile, when actually done well not the BS we see a lot of.

Probably most important is to give yourself a bit of grace and flexibility.
Quite a few hog and poultry farms are downstream the Cape Fear River from the Chemours plant.
Outside of criminal convictions and some other special cases, minimally over 50% is often sufficient for the law.
We're in the process of doing just that and adding chat context/basically remembering your past questions.
Get your own domain.

Host your own email server or pay for one that allows for unlimited addressed on a hosted domain. You'll learn a lot from self-hosting, mainly that email isn't as open as it has been.

Give out email addresses that identifies whom you gave the address to.

friendthatsharescontactlistwithapps@example.com

www.somewebsite.xyz@example.com

bank@example.com

seeminglycharitablenonprofit@example.com

1 contact, 1 email address.

Forward to your 'true' account by default, block once you've had enough of their junk. Be careful when replying as to not email from the 'true' account.
It's about as useful as having an obedient 2nd year CS student with access to a juypter notebook. Which is to say, pretty useful for certain stuff!

You can do flows like:

- Upload CSV of stock data

- "Graph the closing price each day"

- "On the other axis, add a line showing volatility"

- "Filter out to just days with above-average volatility"

etc

Pretty useful for analyzing raw data.
Seems logical thanks for engaging with the question.
The plates sharing with anti-abortion is definitely worth emphasis, because it carries a lot more risk to a lot more people. And potentially causes a lot more harm.
EU != Europe. Biggest country in Europe is Russia. Biggest population is Russians.
I just posted about Twilio and their vague AUP yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36603591

There are a host of reasons why your account can be suspended or terminated, all at the judgement of Twilio as to whether you actually violated something or not, and there doesn't seem to be any recourse.

Personally, I've dropped interest in Twilio for a project I'm working on and will be going forward with Telnyx.
I was going to comment on the same thing. The high concentrations in the East Coast was because of intentionally dumping of PFAS?
I'm in the UK and there was nearly no multiple choice exams, both external and internal. Most external exams used scanning software with questions split out to make it faster to mark them. Somehow our teachers managed.

The only multiple choice exams were optional additions the school could purchase, ie: Maths Challenge, benchmarking, career advice...
Historic Tropical Cyclone Tracks (2006)
Discusses how the Coriolis force results in no hurricanes near the equator and why large ares in the south hemisphere features no hurricanes all year round.
Please I beg you: ask it how to take a snapshot of an EC2 instance and then how to restore it :)