skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My problem was the state lines. My first guess was somewhere in West Virginia, which happened to be right, but being from the west coast, I had trouble eyeballing where to click for West Virginia.

The game is great, but I'm shouting to the wind about the decline in quality of online maps. For example, I can barely see roads on Google maps any more. The lines are faint and low contrast. Zooming in doesn't help because the font remains tiny. Map makers hate middle-aged people.
>I'm highly skeptical that heavily restricting buying and selling of companies in general will be a better way to run a market when it seems your goal is to prevent monopolies (or put another way, ensure competition)

ah, the markets I am talking about are goods and services markets. Financial markets, they take care of themselves, and at the same time garner no sympathy from the majority who don't participate in them.

if monopolies emerge some other way, sure, break 'em up just the same.
Machato is the closest I've found as well, other than CLI / console tools or "roll your own".

Ability to set (and save) system contexts is critical. It's unclear to me why most apps don't enable this.

I can't get by without Machato's other innovation of suppressing earlier parts of the history I no longer need later in the conversation, making it straightforward to have 64k interactions with the 8k model.

Ability to fork and file conversations, as well as the cost monitoring, are gravy.

- https://untimelyunicorn.gumroad.com/l/machato

- https://github.com/sigoden/aichat
When the company you work for is burning VC money with no hope or intention of profitability, the only rational technology choice you can make as an engineer is to pick a promising but unproven technology which could boost your resume and help you land your next gig more easily. Or you simply pick it because you like and want to work with it and there is no one to stop you.

I'd be very happy to hear I am wrong about this and see a profitable company with an established product using it.
I read your position as being the copyright should belong to the holders of the copyright for the training works?

I can sort of see that but a) I'm also seeing it posited that the copyright could belong to either ht model or the company that produced the model (where does that logic come from?) and b) My own creativity is trained on the works of many others but my work is still my own, why is this different for an LLM?
Where do you even get a soapbox sturdy enough to stand on these days?
I mean that as an app developer, I wish I could run models as powerful as ChatGPT on consumer hardware. Unfortunately, at the moment it's not possible, despite all the great progress and projects like llama.cpp. However, I see that this tech would become viable very soon. So, as a developer focusing on consumer apps, but concerned about my own and my users privacy, I decide that it's worth it to use Open AI. For now, for the sake of exploring possible new user experiences and interactions. The moment local tech is viable, I would be the first to opt out of sending my data to Open AI and use LLMs locally. Until then, we pretend that one day it's gonna be fully private and local and explore UX/UI with Open AI at the backend. Best I could do at the moment is to respect user privacy myself, and this app backend is designed to only handle your queries for a short time in-memory, never logging or recording user queries, only passing it to Open AI for streaming responses and measuring usage for billing.
> A co-worker drove to SLC from LA (abut 700 miles) in their Model 3 a few months ago. It took over 24 hours,

....how?

HOW!?

I drive a Model 3. I recently drove from Portland, OR to Santa Clara and back 665 miles each way. Each way only took ~12 1/2 hours.

I'm sorry, but either your co-worker is lying, or they're bad at driving, or there's more to the story. Did they think they need to charge to 100% at each charging stop or something?
Fun related fact about 1-5 survey responses in Germany: make sure you specify that 5 is the top mark and 1 is the bottom, otherwise you’re liable to get some really odd results.

This is because 1 is the highest grade (mark) in school, and 5 is failing, as is the even-worse 6.

And even so informed, or accustomed to 1-5 scale used by everyone else, Germans are more likely than Americans to give a 4 instead of a 5 to something that they were happy with, but was not the best they’d ever experienced.
To help others understand, This image shows that there's only two possible locations left where all the circles intersect. Because the game gives exact distance to the target the correct answer must be on the circles.
Both Asimov and Arthur C. Clarke predicted that neurotic and eventually homicidal robots would be the end result of imprinting AI with contradictory goals which are impossible to reconcile. We seem to be doing our best to make this scenario come to pass.
I can't even see this tweet.
I’m skeptical anyone has ever done this successfully. Once there are examples people can point to, this talking point might have merit. But this fear dates back to at least 2019, and as far as I can tell it’s still unfounded.
> It also enables people to fix attribution mistakes within a reasonable time

See also: https://doctorow.medium.com/a-bug-in-early-creative-commons-...
I think honestly, 99% of the time, they're doing equivalent work. The thing is, if even 1% of the time they don't make the mistake the 20k person would make, that could save a large company millions of dollars over.
Yup. Avoided the site for a few days. Saw the company's response. Then saw them forcibly re-opening communities. Deleted my account.

Reddit believes that they make the communities, when in reality the communities make Reddit what it is.
Haha, no. My law firm IT days are long over. Thinking back on it, though, with the strong antipathy many middle-aged and older attorneys had against typing, though, how they got papers written in college and law school. All those guys (and they were mostly guys) knew how to do was talk into a dictation machine; the word processing work was mostly for the womenfolk.
The review is upside down!
Is server component default always a performance win? Or should it be opt-in?
Agreed. However, my point about GP stands.
I don’t like it, but the usage is “[attack as a] red team”, in other words “act in an adversarial manner”.
Text of the tweet:

We have just launched a new, improved version of TweetDeck. All users can continue to access their saved searches & workflows via tweetdeck.twitter.com by selecting “Try the new TweetDeck” in the bottom left menu.

Some notes on getting started and the future of the product below:

- All your saved searches, lists, and columns will carry over to the new TweetDeck. You’ll be prompted to import your columns when you load the application for the first time.

- TweetDeck now supports full composer functionality, Spaces, video docking, polls, and more.

- Teams functionality in TweetDeck is temporarily unavailable and will be restored in the coming weeks.

- In 30 days, users must be Verified to access TweetDeck.

For more information, visit our Help Center here: help.twitter.com/using-twitter/
Right, but - I have never engaged in domestic abuse. I have never caused a car accident. I have never had a work accident. And yet, I drink daily.

Why should my own enjoyment of life be curtailed, simply because others can't behave themselves? That would be punishing me for others' failings, and that is unjust.
Don't do that to yourself... Use teddit or old.reddit.com at least.
The topic hasn't changed. I'm just getting down to the root of where your arguments come from. That's why it looks a bit different. If you're arguing about the health of a tree by nature of the leaves and I am saying that the roots and foundation are problematic then the conversation will look different. The articles you reference, and thus where your evidence for your claims come from, have self inconsistencies and claims that are verifiably false. Look back at what I have said from this lens. Look back at what you have linked and actually read (or reread) the articles for more context. I put in the effort to read everything you sent me, it would necessitate that you do so in kind (including your own sources. I mean if you link me things that aren't relevant then of course we'll digress, but that mistake is on you, not me. You have even demonstrated this by admission of the confusion about Watts).

I want to also clarify that good faith doesn't just mean that you have good intentions. The bar is far higher than that. You have to have a willingness to change opinions given countering evidence. You have to do your best to interpret my words as to their intended meaning, not to the literal (because language is fuzzy and imprecise). It does require you to take time and process to the best of your ability, to ask for clarification where you are confused. But I assure you that everything I have wrote is not only connected to the responses, but strongly so. If you can take time to see this then you'll demonstrate good faith. But if you also do so then the conversation need not continue further anyways. So that's kinda where we'll stand because frankly I don't have the energy to continue. You can put that on me. But maybe you should attempt to understand why that is so.
Anything you send out over the internet is by definition not private.

The only way to guarantee something is private is if it never leaves your computer.
Are you thinking about trying to learn more about this issue or do something about it?
This was also me. It's 100% true. Works even better when you can just set them up with an iPad and a keyboard case! Everyone is much happier.

Windows without Active Directory and Group Policy management is a straight up nightmare. Even with good hardware the default Windows config, especially the Home editions, is just such garbage compared to macOS.
the LLM were already trained on data with toxicity, This is why they have the weightings to know how to respond.

They aren't really teaching the model anything it hasnt seen before.

If you want toxic output, you can get it.
Rclone for Business
>smart enough to explain us any idea

Are dogs, or pigs, or whales, part of the intelligence club? They are clearly intelligent beings with problem-solving skills. We won't be teaching them basic calculus any time soon.
you might like mine! open source and compiling from source is encouraged. https://github.com/smol-ai/menubar
Location: Sydney, Australia

Remote: Open to remote or in person

Willing to relocate: Yes (domestic and international)

Technologies: Javascript/Typescript, Python, SQL, React, NextJs, Node, React Native, Postgres

Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kjE2M_KGaaofh4E8PVVS844zSca...

Email: mark.william.collins@gmail.com

10+ years of experience in product management. Strong background in fintech and payments, working at Stripe, Siteminder and Zip. Background in engineering and well-suited to technical roles. Open to small or large companies.
I suspect the limit of what can be expressed in human language and comprehended by the human mind is vast, but yes, not infinite. I think the AIs will absolutely saturate the connection between them and us, with a non-stop torrent of information which will range from useful to civilization-changing.

And I think this is all very unlike how we are currently impacting the lives of cockroaches with our insights about, well anything. Thus, it's not a good analogy.
What a very strange article. It starts by (rightly) expressing scpeticism that Musk's claim that FSD would increase the value of the car, and finishes by complaining that FSD didn't increase the value of the car. It's exactly what you (and everyone else) predicted - FSD does not turn your car into an appreciating asset and it never will.
Once you try a high refresh rate monitor, even for work, you just don't want to go back. Every movement and animation is buttery smooth.

Try setting your refresh rate to 30hz for an hour.
You can achieve the same thing in Rust or any other language that offers some sort of field privacy (which Zig doesn't btw) by wrapping the hash map with your own type and exposing the interface you want.
It's far too easy to destroy any type of RLHF done to try to prevent bad behavior from an LLM, and just "fixing the dataset" doesn't really help.

For example, if you want a LLM to generate things that look like social security numbers, you may try to prompt it asking for social security numbers. It will of course give you "I'm sorry hal I can't do that..."

Then start using a technique like token filtering/filter assisted decoding, to make it where the LLM can only generate hyphens and numbers, and suddenly it does what you ask despite RLHF

I explored this a tiny bit in the later sections of my paper studying what happens when you restrict an LLMs vocabulary: https://aclanthology.org/2022.cai-1.pdf#page=17

You can even play with this with open source models using CTGS: https://github.com/Hellisotherpeople/Constrained-Text-Genera...

Now we have even more sophisticated stuff like Guidance from microsoft, LMQL, and other template languages which also filter vocabularies to force behavior we want. The reality is that LLMs are basically impossible to remove the risk of bad behavior in.
I think the ecosystem is more important than the programming language. You can choose any language, if you bloat your application with 20MB JPEGs, 3rd party API requests that take tens of seconds or implement animations that take seconds to complete, the language won't matter that much.

I am not sure if there are languages that come with a fool-proof ecosystem when it comes to implementing things and making them fast. The only one I can think of are UI-based applications builders, that only allow you to add to your app only a limited subset of UI elements or features.
Amazon was consistently averaging greater than 30% compounding annual returns from 2012 to 2021, which is far in excess of the Seattle housing market. This is obvious to anyone who knows how to read a chart. Sorry to say, but if that was you missing out on those amazing returns to fund a down payment then you’re just bad at personal finance. In a (near) ZIRP environment you obviously buy real estate by levering up not by selling equity.
FWIW, today's puzzle seems particularly straightforward. I've since tried a few of the earlier ones, and sometimes was on the wrong side of the country altogether for the first try.
You sometime see it as "red teaming" or "red team'ed" which might be more grammatically correct?

Regardless, "to red team something" really is a common saying in the security industry. It's the corpo/whitehat version of "to pwn".
Smol Menubar: Simultaneously Ping ChatGPT/Bard/Bing/Anthropic with a Shortcut
> However, if you are thrown into an existing projects that does have all of these things, it's usually because they're actually necessary.

That is almost never true.
If everyone with dementia went to such a facility then we would need ~30,000 of them in the US. However, most people with dementia either don’t need such extreme care or have more severe medical issues, so the real number is probably a several hundred such facilities.
Your data is yours, the app is designed to never record or log your queries. The monetisation is simple - reselling Open AI services in a convenient package. I hope that one day it would be possible to ship a local model of a comparable quality, and simply charge for the convenience of the app and allow unlimited use. Until then, the plan is to offer various levels of subscriptions and work out the reselling model which works both for the users and the sustainability of my indie app dev studio efforts.
More than half that cost is subsidized. The maximum cost to residents is $43k, and it is on a sliding scale based on family income.
Weird to see people get worked up about scraping the web for "AI" when search engine companies have been scraping the web for over 25 years.

99% of the time people's complaints about "permission" and "information accidentally made public" are the same arguments they have been using about search engines for years. Most of them have court cases even.
Interesting, I’d assume it’s professionals in the video/photography/production space spending the serious money on high end displays. Where are you getting your data?
Laughing on Line
No non-human animals are in the club that's marked by having a language with an infinitely generative syntax and a large (100,000+ words) and always-growing vocabulary.

Intelligence might be a spectrum, but powerful generative language is a step function: you have it or you don't. If you have it, then higher intelligences can communicate complex thoughts to you, if you don't they can't. We have it, so we are in the club, we are not cockroaches.
To do the work of a red team. To try to break something in order to identify its flaws.

It’s very common in English for nouns to become verbs that mean the thing you use the noun to do.
I've worked with marcandre before and can wholeheartedly endorse him. ← I was not asked to post this.
So are the people who irrationally love Tesla.
What many people don't seem to want to hear is that most "ML" problems are simple ML problems. LLMs are a neat advancement and a great tool in a variety of applications but for most applications they introduce a great deal of uncertainty and often at significant cost.

They're a good complement to great design and infrastructure but you're fooling yourself if you think they're a replacement.
An interesting part of the recent book An Immense World was its coverage of how mantis shrimp likely don't use photoreceptors like human's do.

Marshall now thinks that the mantis shrimp sees colors in a unique way. Rather than discriminating between millions of subtle shades, its eye actually does the opposite, collapsing all the varied hues of the spectrum into just 12.

From Science: "A Different Form of Color Vision in Mantis Shrimp"

The mantis shrimps (stomatopods) can have up to 12 photoreceptors, far more than needed for even extreme color acuity. Thoen et al. conducted paired color discrimination tests with stomatopods and found that their ability to discriminate among colors was surprisingly low. Instead, stomatopods appear to use a color identification approach that results from a temporal scan of an object across the 12 photoreceptor sensitivities. This entirely unique form of vision would allow for extremely rapid color recognition without the need to discriminate between wavelengths within a spectrum.
With this method you may also land upon future pharmaceutical names.
I'm not familiar with all this, but when I run the demo page (https://webauthn.lubu.ch/_test/client.html) on macOS 13.4.1 with Safari (Firefox doesn't work) I get "none" for the apple attestation.
Pedantic stuff like this is the argumentative version of bike-shedding.
The EU has a Mastodon instance:
https://social.network.europa.eu/explore
Similar article in the latest New Yorker : https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/07/03/the-perils-and...
Not with just that info. Lot of what I quickly found is all press release marketing fluff. You need the % phosphorus and a bunch of other variables.

Battery tech needs little phosphorous now, in terms of overall percentage and even with overly optimistic battery estimates I don’t think it will get to any more than 10% of demand. It’s mostly about fertiliser/agriculture.
I just mean my daily stock fluctuations matter more than any raise i've ever gotten in my career.

If I never get another raise ever but my stock continues to grow i'd be happy.
Can join also be thought of as unification? Similar to type checking.

https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs3110/2011sp/Lectures/le...
I was also rejected for the app description, however I decided to argue against their ruling. I changed the description slightly, however when submitting a new build I pointed out that all my materials are written in accordance with OpenAI brand guidelines, and the app successfully passed the review.
I don't visit Reddit often, but some tv/book fandom subs I check up on look deteriorated.

Part of this may be Discord sucking away some users though, as I see Discord links in the sidebars.

"Chat" subs (which I dont frequent myself) seem like they would be particularly vulnerable... But maybe not shrug.
Did Google say they aren’t respecting robots.txt files?
How exactly does this make their search engine better?
In the overwhelming majority of companies, I’d venture to say that “AI and ML powered” actually means “sort this list and take the first item.”
Phosphate in soil is mostly in fixed, unavailable forms (like ferrous phosphate). Prolonged application of phosphate fertilizer would cause their accumulation. At that point, I think it would be worthwhile to look for ways to tap into that store, for example Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSBs), or plants genetically modified to perform the same function in their roots.

Phosphate removed from fields by erosion or in plant matter would have to be replaced at some point.
> I would advocate against titling it "yet another..."

But it's YMCA ..
If we’re going to be pedantic, your objection is to usage, not grammar. “Red team” clearly functions as a verb in the headline. Whether or not it’s an acceptable verb is a question of usage.
Location: New Jersey, USA
Remote: Yes, Preferred
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies:
- Professionally: C# .NET, React, Java Spring, SQL Server, Postgres, Docker.
- Personally: Python Django, Svelte, C++.
- Open to working with other technologies.
Résumé/CV: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7dyfed8lr312lh5/Michael%20Doyle%20Resume.pdf?dl=0
Email: michaeldoylecs@gmail.com

I am looking for full-time work. I tend to gravitate toward backend-like roles, but I have experience with frontend work and am not against working with such, whether that be a small part or a large part of the role.
If true that pokes a rather large hole in the concept of progress now doesn't it?
I'd be interested to hear why your app will beat others in performance. Looking at the repo, it seems to be electron-based, so it's not obvious to me on why I should try it, if I'm looking for responsiveness.

Edit: had a closer look, it's a multi-app for different AI chatbots. Fun, but not at all what I'm looking for (responsive Mac interface to OpenAI API).
Oh, I wasn't aware the bridge was actively maintained... Any hope to ever have things like this properly considered?

https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-irc/pull/146...

https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-irc/pull/137...

https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-appservice-irc/pull/146...
German public TV network, they run a dozen channels https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARD_(broadcaster) created their own instance at https://ard.social They use it to publish news, similar to how they use Twitter. Currently 8 accounts.
Show HN: LLM Markdown – Demo of rich-text support
This app is demonstrating how to support rich-text (markdown) in LLM responses (OpenAI in this case). It's a Nextjs app, with Vercel AI, and remark for handling the formatting.
To be frank, this makes the website extremely deceptive. That isn't "Private by design" - it's the opposite. You choose to prioritize the better AI assistant _over_ privacy.

The claim that "Your data is never recorded" may even be legally fraudulent. I'm glad that you don't record the data, but OpenAI does - making the claim as written a lie.

I understand why you made these decisions, but the website should not contain borderline false advertising.
If the bots pass the Turing test, does it really matter if they aren't human? Even if they are subliminally recommending hot singles in your area.