skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I imagine it's much like any other manufacturer with an over-the-top fanbase. The constant gushing and cheerleading creates opposition out of thin air. I'm not sure there has ever been a set of fans as dedicated as Tesla ones, to be honest. Hell, they still accuse anyone who dares to disagree with being short on TSLA.
BYD had an even better June: https://www.forbes.com/sites/russellflannery/2023/07/02/warr.... It’s now on track to eclipse Tesla as the world’s biggest BEV manufacturer.
huidu would be "canary deployment", I think
I think that’s a myth. (a) the timing is wrong (b) The people who worked on the IIgs seem to think WDC couldn’t deliver enough of the faster 65816 parts to meet Apple’s volume, and that’s why they never shipped a faster IIgs.
There’s also an excellent series of books by Susskind of the same name.
Two answers of note:

1) post - 2000 makes it look 'fresh', two decades of lookback diminishes the recent changes which look bad for the pro hydrocarbon camp.

2) Rob Bryce is now and always has been a Texas PR voice for the Texas oil baron crowd.

He comes to substack via the Institute for Energy Research ( a successor to the Institute for Humane Studies and another jewel in the Koch anti climate pro burn oil PR thinky tanks ) and the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (aka Centre of Conservative Turd Gilding and Polishing ).

His job is literally to spin data to make oil look good.
Does it apply to the Model X?

Environmental subsidies on a $100k car doesn't seem quite right... Doubly so if it applies to stuff like the Hummer EV.
Yes, but that's 恋, not 恋してる. Do you ever hear anyone say 恋してる? I can't say I ever have, which isn't to say that it doesn't happen, though.
I think what scares a lot of people is the prospect of maintaining a server, configuring it to be secure and keeping it up to speed with security updates. With a cloud product, the only concern becomes keeping your project's dependencies updated which is less intimidating.

It's something that's on my mind when I think about launching a site that's intended to draw a significant userbase. Back in the day I'd set up VPS instances with nginx+unicorn+rails and it was relatively smooth, but security has seemingly become so much more critical that I don't know I'd trust myself to get all the biggest holes patched up and more importantly, keep them patched.
BYD is on track to beat Tesla after an amazing June: https://www.forbes.com/sites/russellflannery/2023/07/02/warr...
Dude I’m literally—right now— using an LLM to fuel and *build* new features in my production website (ablf.io). I’m just some random eng. I’m sure there are many like me. And I’m not talking about gpt just recommending the odd function. It builds entire modules and writes comprehensive test suites. I’d rate its competency as similar to a junior dev. I guess I’m lying to right? It helps me learn about and write ML and NLP stuff I’m very new to. It’s basically replaced stack overflow for me.
Didn't read the whole thing but whatI did read is good.

It's very true that the Sopranos came out of nowhere and has never been surpassed.

But, its not the best show in every respect. It has the best dialogue, the most complex characters and the best acting. But it doesn't have the best character development or the best plot imo. There's more than one way for a show to be great. But while other shows are great, they are great in lesser ways. The Sopranos is the best.
Let's see Tesla's growth rate when they're closer to Toyota's size. And speaking of meaningless numbers, who cares about market cap? How does revenue compare? Toyota is about 3x, I think?
Tesla relies on China for its growth, as well as a big chunk of its batteries.
I mean he's gotta be an excellent mental gynmast to speak about real, profitable, value-adding businesses and crypto in the same post.
This is a good way to look at it. The deployment of the LLM technology we currently have is one thing. The impact of AGI, when it's created in the future, is a different thing. And people are often not clear on which of the two they're discussing.
This list is shadow IT, which means the things that the corporate IT department isn't paying for and often doesn't even know about. The tools you mention are in the Productiv (and Okta) data in a different category.
It doesn't have to be ambiguous. If you want to be exclusive with someone, just say so. If they don't want to be exclusive with you after a month of dating, you're probably never going to get there and you're better off cutting your losses.
It delivered over (and presumably sold) 96% of the vehicles it has produced. Presumably the price cuts have had their desired effect on reducing unsold inventory

> The deliveries are the most ever in a quarter for Austin-based Tesla, and a 83% increase from a year ago. The company also managed to trim the gap between production and deliveries — a figure closely watched by analysts — to 13,560 units in the second quarter. In the first quarter, it produced nearly 18,000 more cars than it delivered to customers.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-02/tesla-set...
> An early 8086 Unix machine

Are there many of these still existing? If I'm not set on having something Canadian, which would be a good model to look into? Would it be a good way to introduce a kid to computers / Unix / programming?
Warren Buffett-Backed EV Maker BYD’s Sales Nearly Doubled in June
> Also, the discourse started getting weird when there were implications by Red Hat leadership someone did something so bad to trigger this sudden change, yet nobody will say who it was.

No company is gonna open itself up to libel lawsuits by naming a company that did something “bad” when they didn’t even need to state the fact that something bad happened in the first place.

Don’t expect Red Hat to name a company here.
“Unbroken” was an incredible read that got into this too.
I think the title of this submission should be updated to reflect it was written in 2013
Yeah, the people who shorted TSLA in the past 18 months did pretty great. It remains a solid strategy.
I apologize in advance for introducing the risk of ruining your life.. but I highly recommend checking out Captain of Industry.

It has a faster start, real world processes, terraforming and I believe is better than Factorio in every way. I consider Factorio a genre defining game and while Satisfactory and DSP comes close to surpassing it their 3d nature makes the game's puzzles easier to solve. Captain of Industry makes the puzzles just as difficult as Factorio despite having more dimensions. CoI has a lot more resources you need to manage as well.
Guidelines for the Organization of Fully Online Meetings
That is an epic level of reach.
I drive with FSD almost every day and it does a great job.
That dismissal held some water until we hit a point where batteries were cheap enough, high capacity enough, and there were enough chargers. We’re still just at the beginning. In 10 years it’ll all be much better
It makes sense because the oral cavity (no pun intended) is under positive pressure with CPAP. Not everyone has sleep apnea and not everyone can tolerate CPAP, so it's not a universal solution to GERD. My GERD would be solvable during hiatal hernia surgery.
These are available to any manufacturer that invests in producing EVs.
ChatGPT for the Anxious and Overwhelmed
We also have an issue of enforcement, I'm not sure if you know... but many, if not all of these behaviors could be acted on with existing legislation. Anti-trust at the federal level and a multitude of state laws on paper make it illegal to do this type of behavior.

The problem is that it's really hard to take action on large corporations. As a consumer, if I wanted to seek remedy for say, false advertising of ingress protection on a phone, it would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees. Without a significant war chest it's almost impossible to hold most companies to account as an individual, and the agencies supposed to be enforcing these issues either won't or can't enforce the laws on the books.
This is extremely misinformed. No matter how you choose to manage workloads, ultimately you are responsible for tuning and optimization.

If you're not in control of the system, and thus kubelet, obviously your hands are tied. I'm not sure anyone is suggesting that for a serious workload.

Now to dispell your myths:

1. You can assign dedicated storage devices to your database. Outside of mount operations you're not going to see much alien fsync activity. This is paranoid.

2. You can pin kubelet CPU cores. You can ensure exclusive access to the remaining ones. There are a number of advanced techniques that are not at all necessary if you want to be a control freak, such as creating your own cgroups. This isn't "outside" of the runtime. Kubernetes is designed to conform to your managed cgroups. That's the whole point. RTFM.

3. The general theme of your complaint has nothing to do with kubernetes. There's no beating a dedicated NIC and even network fabric. Some cloud providers even allow you to multi-NIC out of the box so this is pretty solvable. Also, like, the dumbest QoS rules can drastically minimize this problem generally. Who cares.

4. Nah. RTFM. This is total FUD.

5.a. I don't understand. Are you sharing resources on the node or not? If you're not, then swap works fine. If you are, then this smells like cognitive dissonance and maybe listen to your own advice, but also swap is still very doable. It's just disk. swapon to your heart's content. But also swap is almost entirely dumb these days. Are you suggesting swapping to your primary IO device? Come on. More FUD.

5.b. OOM killer does what it wants. What's a better alternative that integrates "well" with the OOM killer? Do you even understand how resource limits work? The OOM killer is only ever a problem if you either do not configure your workload properly (true regardless of execution environment) or you run out of actual memory.

Bottom line: come down off your high horse and acknowledge that dedicated resources and kernel tuning is the secret to extreme high performance. I don't care how you're orchestrating your workloads, the best practices are essentially universal.

And to be clear, I'm not recommending using Kubernetes to run a high performance database but it's not really any worse (today) than alternatives.

> It's written for Web developers. To make things appear simpler for them, while sacrificing a lot of resources and hiding a lot of actual complexity... which is impossible to hide, and which, in an even of failure will come to bite you.

What planet are you currently on? This makes no sense. It's a set of abstractions and patterns, the intent isn't to hide the complexity but to make it manageable at scale. I'd argue it succeeds at that.

Seriously, what is the alternative runtime you'd prefer here? systemd? hand rolled bash scripts? puppet and ansible? All of the above??
Also because, as I understand it, quite a lot of moderators are currently on strike[0] due to Stack Exchange allowing AI-generated content on the platform.

The complaints are mostly that this makes it substantially harder to moderate the site, and that it's just one example of the growing disconnect between Stack Exchange and its overall community.

[0]: https://openletter.mousetail.nl/
CU Hiking Club Celebrates 100 Years
If you believe TSLA is going to the moon, now's the time to buy!

Though I don't think there are any good comparisons to be made with AMZN. Very different situation.
I agree with OP but just for the sake of argument: You can use arrays as a member of a struct which also contains length, dimension and data specific details in other variables. If the problem is that this not being part of the language means everyone will do this their own way and will have to write a ton of extra code to support this, then yeah, that sucks but are most things C not like that anyways?
Sweet, that should arrive at the same time as my paperwork for one Brooklyn bridge I just purchased
I think it’s more due to Elon Musk.
Me too please and thank you.
The entire world relies on China. That’s not an argument.
Cherry picking dates can make any company look like an excellent short.
P/E tells most of what you need to value a company that is stable in size. Tesla could grow earnings 10x and it would still have a higher P/E with the same valuation. It's way out of line unless you believe they are going to own half the world market for cars one day. I suppose if SpaceX can obtain 90 percent of the launch market, why not Tesla?
>I think the "duck-tapers" Graeber describes in his book are a bit different from what you understand currently. He's mostly talking about the people who are doing tedious cleanup work because of reasons that can obviously and trivially be fixed but the higher-ups in the organization are not doing it for various reasons (mostly politics).

No, no different - this sounds like every bit the same phenomenon I thought I was addressing.

It's a fake distinction because every job can be framed in a way that puts it on either side of the divide.

And lack of understanding of other peoples' jobs is clearly at the core of the issue.

The "higher ups being stupid because of politics" can never be really definitely false, but it never, ever, is an explanation that shows understanding or justifies calling something trivial.
> You don't need more than single-writer concurrency if your write txns are fast enough.

This only works on systems with sufficiently slow storage. If your server has a bunch of NVMe, which is a pretty normal database config these days, you will be hard-pressed to get anywhere close to the theoretical throughput of the storage with a single writer. That requires 10+ GB/s sustained. It is a piece of cake with multiple writers and a good architecture.

Writes through indexing can be sustained at this rate (assuming appropriate data structures), most of the technical challenge is driving the network at the necessary rate in my experience.
If they’d “just fork” they’d actually have to invest money into building credibility for their forks.

The whole point is to essentially freeload off the money Red Hat is investing instead.

There’s probably a great business
to build on a RH fork, but the Rocky Linux one isn’t it.
Why would I want to jailbreak now? The main things I jailbroke for all have apps now or have been built into iOS. Anything super cool that I'm missing?
Frida 16.1.0 Released
Just chiming in to say that after 15 years of building PCs for gaming on Linux, the 5800X3D is probably the best product I've ever purchased. The price to performance of this thing is completely absurd for the type of games I play.
> Simplicity is usually achieved by dividing tasks into small, manageable subtasks. There is even an extreme nanopass compiler design used for studying compiler topics in education.

...and production compilers: https://andykeep.com/pubs/dissertation.pdf Definitely Chez 9 is based on it -- not sure about Chez 8.
Whole core masking is not quite as easy as it should be, predominantly because the API is designed to hand wave away actual cores. The way you typically solve this is to go the other way and claim exclusive cores for the orchestrator and other overhead.
恋してる is for songs and poetry, as far as I'm aware.
> Mickey Mouse due to enter the public domain in 2024

Good luck avoiding Disney's trademark lawsuits.
Can anyone explain to me why we couldn't just use client SSL certs everywhere? Before the first time you connect to a website, your browser asks if you want to generate a new cert or reuse an existing one, you make a choice, and from then on you interact with that site as an identity tied to that cert and you're done. From the servers point of view, the user's identity is a key fingerprint, which is just a property of the connection. Why is it more complicated than that?

Oh right, the benevolent overlords, in their wisdom, discerned that mere mortals can't be trusted with private key material.

Nevermind, move along.
I would say that Unix time doesn't violate causality, because it only does whole seconds and those whole seconds monotonically increase. You need to take extra care when bolting on fractional seconds.

If converting things from one system to another means two very close events get the same timestamp? Eh, that can happen in many ways with many systems. That's not bugginess.
I'm assuming the "by the Bluebook" implementation they're referring to is this: https://github.com/devhawala/ST80

It's nice to use, but awkward because almost nobody has a three-button mouse laying around. One of the cool things about the Blue Book is that it lays out exactly how to implement e.g. graphics primitives and even the object system itself. In fact, the implementation I linked above uses the exact implementation of these things as outlined in the Blue Book, just written in Java.

> The first thing is that the Smalltalk environment wasn't really an operating system the same way something like Mac OS was. It’s more like an IDE that runs on bare hardware.

I disagree with this. It is an operating system. Just because it doesn't have barriers like a kernel and doesn't treat debuggers as third-class citizens doesn't make it any less of an operating system. It just makes it "not Unix". Lisp machines were also very similar in this regard: there is no "system" in the Unix sense: your compiler, debugger, and runtime were a whole unit and that is what you booted into.

> The Smalltalk environment was a revolutionary GUI, but it was still a system you would have had to have been a computer operator or something to really use.

Probably true. But I'd also like to mention the images in the GitHub link I posted are very early snapshots of Smalltalk-80 and may lack any features that were added later. More importantly, the author is missing that these machines came with a manual that likely described how to use the interface. But I do have have to concede: these machines were extremely expensive and definitely not targetted towards "everyday people", but can we even say the same about the Lisa? I know the Macintosh was definitely designed for everyday people, but the Lisa was pretty expensive even for its time, and many attribute its commercial failure to this.
Another one I really like in that general category is "lighthouse at the edge of the universe." It's meant to played in a short session every night, and incorporates your own daily experiences & emotional state into the game. So it's also somewhat a tool for self reflection. Fun concept, painfully sweet to do with a child.

https://lostwaysclub.itch.io/the-lighthouse-at-the-edge-of-t...
There’s also so much more value to add if you have fewer user personas to worry about.

I’m not a lawyer, but while making some assumptions I bet they would love some auto-formatted references. Maybe as part of some LexisNexis integration? Just log in with oauth and work like you normally do, the bibliography will stay up to date depending on what’s added and removed. Could even highlight content that appears to be unreferenced.

I’m sure some sort of review+approval process is pretty common in law offices, build it in! Pitch it as a way to cut out confusing email threads, but still keep a traceable record of reviews and decisions.

Someone already mentioned it in this thread, but “script” is a pretty unsearchably generic name. If you go for lawyers, now you can go hard on a Latin name. Nothing really stopping you from doing that with any other kind of user, but lawyers seem to love their Latin.
because its ugly:

package hello

func good() (int, error) {
return 0, nil
}

func bad() *struct {
int
error
} {
return nil
}
Then what use cases are the general public using LLMs for other than automation for it to have exploded in popularity? Tho anecdotally it seems to be used for “wisdom” of the crowds coupled with blind trust in the objectivity of a language model
I think someday reality will set in and Tesla stock will plummet, but I would be crazy to short it. I guarantee Tesla fans can stay irrational way longer than I can stay solvent.
I'll have a look. The last time I touched anything open source in this space it was Adempeire. That was not a good experience.
Everyone involved in the efforts of developing a consistent and consumer-ready UI and stringent metaphors from the beginnings at PARC deserves due respect. E.g., the team at Xerox SDD (Systems Development Department) developing the Star, the team at PERQ (Three Rivers), and, of course, Apple (there were probably a few more). They are probably somewhat undeserved in the shadow of what was still early (and often inconsistent) experiments.

And, yes, the first commercial GUI systems were expensive, as they required fast processors and comparably lots of RAM, which was expensive. It was probably still too early for consumer oriented systems and the systems that were had to address special niches, like knowledge workers and experts. Even the Mac just barely managed a certain level of affordabilty, and this only by (initially) including just a barely viable amount of RAM. (Compare 128K for Mac vs 2MB for the Lisa, which also meant stripping advanced features like multitasking.)
It's not about being poetic. Soseki thought "I love you" was too obscene for a Japanese standard at that time.

Although I don't think it applies to modern Japan, it certainly resonates with me somehow. I don't trust people who talk about love.
Good to hear! I know Asia well and it's certainly different. But I never really gave Japan a chance (visited but the language barrier was too much), so I was curious.
I think he means "somehow" in the meaning of "somehow, none of the copyright holders asked the school for his information."
What a wonderful piece. Phenomenal writing
You can override the dependency of a dependency in npm.

https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v9/configuring-npm/package-json?v...
Huh. Thanks for the heads up. Used to be a useful service but apparently the domain expired and was replaced by spam.
After initially bouncing off of Factorio and then having a lot of fun with shapez, I tried Factorio again and got totally addicted for a while. Shapez is a perfect entry point and is different enough to be worthwhile for its own sake. I also just love the chill nature of Shapez, it's a lot less stressful than Factorio since there are no senemies and resources don't run out. I have high hopes for Shapez 2, which, from the dev logs, looks great and will hopefully have some extra QOL stuff to eliminate some of the original's minor annoyances.
There are still only a handful of 'common' TLDs including .com, .net maybe that are widely accepted and understood by the masses. Like a universal 'this is a website' calling card. However, with the plethora of other TLDs available now, and more importantly the lack of a real need for a memorable/"typable" domain as many either arrive via a search or a link shared in email/on social, I'd say .com is the least important its ever been. It's like how you promote it, share it that matters.... as long as it's clear whatever.xyz123 is a website/destination for them to visit, then it should be fine. (if your domain is something weirdly worded on top of a weird uncommon TLD then it may not be clear to readers that its a URL etc)
Because the inputs to the models are copyrighted works?

If I open up Photoshop and make a new file, I own my art. So why would me opening up an existing PSD and moving all the pieces around and then claiming it as my own be an issue?

I don’t think anyone would question this at all if the model were trained only on your own data. It’s the part where a bunch of other people’s stuff was involved that makes it fuzzy enough to be an open legal question.
>the additional safety benefit of a longer crumple zone between the driver and oncoming obstacles

and even better if you have some baby seats strapped into the (formerly) back seats, those things are designed to be tough and safe!