skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The word you're looking for is "egalitarianism".

"Feminism" means different things to different people. If you use "feminism" as a synonym for "gender egalitarianism", then that's not entirely incorrect, but you are picking a fight that will be full of straw man arguments, because other people use the word differently.
I agree that this is very much a management problem. Incompetent management, to add. I'm just curious why would these engineers stick for so long. Everything I read about Twitter nowadays suggest a highly toxic work environment. And from experience: having an unstable boss is tiring, to say the least.
This is also how Prolog terms are represented on the heap in the Warren Abstract Machine (WAM). For instance, taking the example of the article, if we have an expression such as the Prolog term +(*(a,b), c), written using operator notation as:

expr(E) :-
E = a*b + c.

Then we get a flattened representation on the global stack of the virtual machine. In Scryer Prolog, we can inspect the WAM instructions with:

?- wam_instructions(expr/1, Is),
maplist(portray_clause, Is).

yielding:

put_structure(*,2,x(3)).
set_constant(a).
set_constant(b).
put_structure(+,2,x(2)).
set_value(x(3)).
set_constant(c).
execute(=,2).

Note how both compound terms are linearized, and appear on the heap as: functor, followed by arguments, each occupying exactly one memory cell of the WAM. The arguments can point to other memory cells. The heap is an array of such cells, all of the same concrete (as opposed to abstract, i.e., WAM-level) type. For example, Scryer Prolog uses 8 bytes for each cell, making cell access and modification very efficient on 64-bit architectures.
The FAA seems to action a lot of concerns... And stuff does get done, planes improve all the time, and it's very safe.

Perhaps this wouldn't have been possible on their budget... But I think I'd rather have no sub than a sub full of dead people.
Apparently you do, given that we're posting in a thread where Twitter is self-imploding due to amateurish technical decisions foisted down by a God King.
If only the Russian government weren't evil incarnate. The Russian language (even just the sound of it) exerts an unholy magnetism on all centers of curiosity and fascination in my brain. I would love to immerse myself completely.
Annotating the Scholarly Web (2015)
It’s almost as if immutability writ large is vindicated, but with a whole lot of complicated rules to let mutation infect everything everywhere even if you’ll never use it. At least that was my takeaway trying to learn Rust.
No it was "management by stochastic gradient descent" as per Elon's usual modus operandi.
That is exactly what Bluesky lets you do
Yes, the SO link posted has a reply which explains by cutting a cube into 6 equal pyramids. This is easily extended to a higher dimensional case, we can cut a n dimensional hypercube into 2n hyperpyramids in a similar way
2 years ago? Not really, all the FAANGs were hiring like crazy to keep talent off the market.

Nowadays after they cut all those people - yeah, definitely
Like the "in-between" of ADHD and dyslexia? I'm being facetious to make a point.
Not really.

Rust is plain hard and complex. There is only so much you can simplify that.

Like, you can make jet fighter easier by adding ways to automatically make some things so pilot doesn't have to do all the steps (like say Rust does with some of the memory management), but it will never be as easy to fly as it is to drive a bicycle, still need to learn how everything works and what does what
It's signal in a sea of noise. The premise (errors as values) is done better and more concisely by languages like Rust, Haskell and Ocaml with ADTs.
I'd say the US is a hegemon but not really an Empire except for a few small islands. They've also made some terrible mistakes such as Vietnam and the 2nd Gulf War. The way the US prosecuted the Korean war was also inexcusable, although I think that one did need to be fought. Let's add some appalling interventions in South America while we're at it.

On the other hand the 1st Gulf War was unavoidable, and overall with the exception of the 2nd Gulf War over the last 40 years they've more or less tried to do the right thing. Today it's widely recognised across parties in the US that 2GW was a mistake. Still, since WW2 they've sunk vast resources into guaranteeing Western European security, and spent Trillions guaranteeing global freedom of navigation that's benefited everybody.

They've been aggressive economically, true, but that's a whole massive deal better than being aggressive militarily and overall global trade in the last 70 years has had incredible benefits. Global poverty has collapsed to a tiny fraction of what it was, the middle class has risen from about 5% to about 60% of the world population, life expectancy rates have soared. Death rates from war have collapsed. The stats on that are up on the last decade it's still historically low. The majority of this happened after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

What Russia and China want to do is take the world back to a cold war situation of vying spheres of geographic influence. What the US wants to do is get out of the world police business while maintaining a peaceful global order conducive to business. So we have Russia and China flexing their territorial military muscles, while the US builds networks of alliances such as an expanded NATO, AUKUS, the Quad and such to better share the load.

I say alliances, but for the latter US strategy to succeed it eventually needs to include nations that are not traditional US allies. India, Brazil, Indonesia, South Africa, even places like Vietnam. These will or may never align with the US and Europe the way the US and Europe do, so such relationships will have to be transactional in nature. Partnerships rather than true alliances, based on common interests around eliminating the scope for military expansionism that favours big regional military hegemons.

So sure, a lot of past mistakes for sure, but the question for us now is where does the world go from here?
It is way cheaper to hyperventilate. Enjoy the dizziness.
OP's not talking about legibility, rather context-span and information density.
I think legibility in programming is mostly familiarity.

Whether it's a C, a Lisp, a ML, or an APL — spend enough time getting your hands dirty with it and you just get used to it.
My point is only that some amount of censorship and control of information is necessary. The particular example I gave is actually quite realistic, and happens to many people each day. While getting it off of the whole Internet is hard, getting it off Twitter/Facebook/Google/Reddit/PornHub is, thankfully, quite easy. The fact that it may linger on Tor and some less reputable porn sites or other places for a longer time is not as problematic, since few people access those.

Overall, what I'm saying is that many people who espouse the virtues of decentralized or federated social media forget or minimize some of the actual benefits of centralized social media with strong moderation [0].

While I think it's great that the internet as a whole is uncontrollable, I don't think "living" in the less controlled parts of the internet for most of your online life would be a pleasant or healthy experience.

[0] I should note that I have some serious qualms about the harm some of this content does to the moderators themselves, but I'm not sure how to grapple with that particular issue.
Sure, creating is easy, what about monitoring, testing, rate limiting, updating (it can't be atomically updated with another resource, good luck testing that), security patching? What if you create a condition which causes an infinite loop of invocations? This is really rare in monoliths because we all agree on patterns like MVC that determine who calls what. When Conway s Law determines your infrastructure this is no longer the case.
The VC funding pyramid ran out of suckers
> The die was too large for the optical projection of the mask, with the result that the corners of the circuitry needed to be rounded off.

How big is the die in the picture?
Ask HN: How do you learn to say “No” to yourself as a founder?
When everything seems like an opportunity, something flying by you need to reach and grab with a 3rd arm...

How do you tell yourself "No" to what seems exciting, trendy?

I try and sleep one night, that can help.
But not always.
I think this is an elegant explanation
> But there’s not really any communication or acknowledgement / accountability.

Are you sure you’re being fair here? I found about 20 emails from them since Summer 2021 (not including account creation kind of emails).

To be fair to you, there aren’t that many emails that are specifically dedicated to shipping updates (i.e the ones titled “Update #1/2/3/etc”). But there are still updates sprinkled in the other emails.

The email from March 2, 2023 said that Group 4 was expected to finish shipping by June and that Group 5 would start shipping Summer/Fall 2023.

I pre-ordered it Summer 2021. I landed in Group 2 even though the pre-order form was only open for less than 30 minutes. Group 2 was expected to ship in early 2022. There were delays that were communicated. The explanations grokked with what was going on in the manufacturing world at that time and also with my expectations of a new hardware venture by an indie software* studio. I received it Summer 2022.

The emails that I see for other groups are no different.

*Any web dev remember Coda?
How did drugs become illegal? Check out the documentary series Hooked. Short answer: Racism and corruption.

[addendum]

Marijuana and Methamphetamine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvGtn8RzF0U&list=PL2-GCln73g...

Ecstasy, LSD & the Raves:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3id6j6nJmlo&list=PL2-GCln73g...

Opium, Morphine and Heroin:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ocqwm
I’m not a lawyer. But I see what the same-sex wedding website case will mean
I don't have any significant experience about ADHD or Dyslexia, either in professional capacity or as a layman to make diagnostic statements.

However, just going by definition of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, continued focus is an issue. When you have code like below where a bunch of attention/focus might be needed to just to parse it/keep it all in your head and those things are biologically in deficit, I can imagine it won't be smooth sailing:

trait Processor<'a, 'b, T>: 'a + 'b {
type Output: 'a + Clone + Debug;
fn process<U, V>(&'a self, item: &'b T, other: U) -> V
where
U: 'a + Clone + Debug,
V: 'a + Into<Self::Output>;
}

PS: for rustaceans, this is made-up code to make a point so please don't try to optimize it.
Oh, they are using Racket. I really love that language. I think it's also great that they explain how to work with structures, instead of going the "everything is a list" aproach (the latter is, in my opinion, better suited for advanced students).

Unfortunately, I haven't managed yet to integrate Racket into my daily work. The last time I tried to use it, the resulting (manually optimized) compiled code was as slow as an unoptimized python solution and 10x slower than a manually optimized Java version.
> The Smash community is technologically adept and will migrate and/or archive in time.

"technologically adept" and "uses gfycat instead of wiki or forum" is mutually exclusive
Yes, serverless lovers should be worried. They should have always been worried.

About just how much money their ideas have thrown at $CLOUD that could've been used for things other than helping build Bezos' Freudian Me-Too Ego Trip What Go Zoom.

Or how much fragility and painfully slow development cycles have been inflicted on people in their org by the inevitable tight coupling to $SPECIFIC_PRODUCT_IN_SPECIFIC_REGION_OF_SPECIFIC_PROVIDER.

And, they should be worried that they've drunk so deeply of the Kool Aid provided at $VENDOR_CONFERENCE_PROBABLY_IN_VEGAS that they considered the cost and the friction a worthwhile trade-off.
It's probably better to think of time as the "zeroth" dimension, in that everything that exists in any other dimension has to exist for some duration of time first. Of course, we can still consider theoretical objects that exist outside of time, just like we can easily consider two-dimensional objects despite being in an existence with three spatial and one temporal dimension, but for an object to physically exist it must at least exist in time.

When you look at time as the zeroth dimension rather than the fourth, it should be obvious that the fourth dimension is simply another spatial dimension. Think about how a two-dimensional plane is a cross section of a three-dimensional object, and line would be a cross section of a plane, and a (zero-dimensional) point is a cross section of a line. So too can our three-dimensional universe be looked as a cross section of a theoretical four-dimensional existence. A three-dimensional object that moves in the fourth dimension would simply cease to exist in our universe, and a four-dimensional object that moves in the fourth dimension would change which 3D cross section is visible to us.
Wayland on NixOS: Confusion, Conquest, Triumph
Coz owners wanted more money
It's not a problem from Nvidia's perspective, and AWS/GCP wouldn't have a right to complain - but users might reasonably conclude that this is a problem, and likewise regulators might consider it unacceptable for Nvidia to have this much market power, if they actually had the technical expertise to examine such things.
I’m not sure who made you the is-ADHD police but yeah it can be bud.
> You do have to wonder what on earth happens at a board meeting in these monsters.

'Dogma', board meeting scene.
This only makes sense if the local market you’re in can actually support this.

If I in the UK ask for £150k outside of very few FAANG or finance companies, it just ain’t gonna happen!
> However, that means interactions, such as user likes, blocks, follows, etc are all public.

Au contraire, if network users control their clients, they can "block"¹ and "follow" content at-the client level without stating it publicly.

¹. Not a full block, as the blockee can still read and interact with the blocker's posts.
>Because false advertising, especially advertising fake medical devices, false drugs, and made up treatments, is illegal in the countries I was in.

>Putting up a billboard with any of this crap would get someone in prison. And justly so.

Sorry for the late reply.

By all means report the advertisers and Google to the authorities wherever you are. I certainly wouldn't be upset of some (or all) of those folks went to jail. In fact, I think it would quite nice.

I use an ad blocker so I don't see such things. As such, if you do please, by all means, involve the authorities.
You appear to want to make this into something it isn't. Bluesky isn't beholden to Jack's wishes and has repeatedly and publicly affirmed the same.

I don't care about Jack and neither should you. Bluesky is Bluesky run by the Bluesky team. The team and what they're building should be your only concern.
Socrates would have questions about this.
Then why is the tool not written in it?
Almost any IP camera? Surely it is going to be very unqiue depending on vendor/hardware?
My Amazon shopping experience works like this.

Find products I'm interested in using their search. This is harder than it sounds, because Amazon's search is horrible.

Filter results by aggregate user ratings. Only consider anything 4.5 stars or higher. In rare cases when product is more niche or I know people have unrealistic expectations and leave reviews like: "coffee maker didn't brush my teeth, 1 star" I make an exception.

Filter remaining products by number of orders. Products with high aggregate rating and lots of orders are far more likely to be better.

Then after all that read a few of the negative reviews to see if there are any systemic flaws, e.g. poor hinges that give out quickly.

Then I pick the cheapest product out of the remaining ones. Usually...unless, like a good consumer, I'm addicted to a particular brand.
I am 45 and I had to catch up on a lot of things. I started programming in 1995 and my language of choice was Pascal 5.5.

Catching up is hard, but it is also "gym for your brain". Plenty of people grow complacent and mentally lazy, because they do not face any additional demands over their careers. It is even possible that mental training postpones dementia.
I've created an account but I need to do some reading, it's a different enough workflow to FreeCAD, that I couldn't immediately figure out how to do some basic things.
Imo: jumping to conclusions based on stupid stereotypes.

He should have lost that libel case imo as I do think he meant it.
was about to point out Shelly too which by default has cloud disabled, can be controlled by MQTT or REST API without an internet connection
For something so critical as IP camera, I'm so frustrated that there isn't a single consumer product that you could use locally or without a manufacturer cloud.

I know we could use a setup with a raspberry, but I would like the usual nice functions of such a problem like: motor and a performant movement détection alerts.
All of that without having to develop all of that myself. I would easy buy the product 2 or 3 times the price we pay for current consumer products.
Read stuff from Thomas Metzinger. I think, he has really good ideas for the integration of psychedelics and meditation to get better insights to your own consciousness.
When I posted this, the HN submission headline was along the lines of “There’s no intuitive explanation for the volume of a cone”, clearly a comment by the submitter that the SE answers aren’t sufficient for them.
> ADHD doesn’t affect your ability to read

That’s a very strong negative claim that deserves citation.
Would have been nice to see how their approach (GPU based fuzzing of SMT formulas) compares to traditional CPU solvers, did I miss it?

Was this a one-off or is there a follow up?
I may be wrong, but I don't think this is accurate.

If the goal were to consume excess production, power plants could just heat a pool of water on-site, or some similar industrial scale "pointless" electricity use.

Rather, negative prices are there because it's in the interest of energy producers to shift demand from the peak, as all their infrastructure needs to be scaled to meet that demand.

So don't think of it as free energy at the time you're using it, think of it as a fine for running your washer/dryer etc. during peak hours.
> It is even possible that mental training postpones dementia.

Thats what I tell myself as the saving grace (sometimes it is indeed a lot of fun).
Are you really saying the universe would be better off without 4 billion people? Each with their own hopes, dreams, families, and hobbies. Whatever value you ascribe to nature only exists because we people are here to witness it. Doubling the number of people doubles the number of sentient beings bringing light and value to the world.

I seriously cannot fathom how someone could say that the world is better off if people didn't exist. What value system justifies that mass murder through erasure?
I think it's an important distinction to make. Because it does means that you can actually infer true things from his statements (or a journalists statements, as news orgs do this kind of "lying" a lot), unlike with a habitual liar.
Which is custom designed for extracting money from corporations.

PoC works, costs nothing, code delivered much faster. CTO impressed.

PoC tidied up and rolled out to production. CTO very not impressed when quarterly expenses are reviewed, but customers are relying on this now.
You missed my point: security is a process, not a product. If I don't trust a closed hardware/source camera, then why should I trust a closed source software, especially one that would have access to all video feeds, and if run on the main desktop machine also all data on the local network and the Internet?

You're right when calling for evidence, and I have none, but what if the software one day turns malicious and it's being caught only when the damage is done? Sorry, but the risks are too high.
Programming simple things in Rust is less readable than programming the same things in other languages - and you can directly point at the language design as the root cause for this.

I'm here doing things like creating an object, iterating over some structure, building a simple function, reading or saving some data, making a small REST API - and while I'm doing these things I have to work with complex syntax and language semantics because the same language also caters to use cases that have nothing to do with the thing I'm working on.
Thank you for the offer man product is looking good!
COVID wasn't anywhere close to just let rip in the US. There's an argument that happened late on in some very Trumpian districts, hence the wards full of dying vaccine deniers late in the pandemic, but overall the difference between COVID policies in Democrat and Republican regions was marginal. Both sides screamed to high heaven about every single wrinkle in policy like it was existential, but they all locked down.
Nobody needs same day delivery for general items. Waiting a few days is ok.
What's the difference between great work and good work? It seems you are trying very hard to be a contrarian ( Which funnily is a trait of older age )
Can the secretary not fill in the form again "as the client" with the additional information needed?

If the additional info doesn't go there, then you shouldn't mix two separate things together.
I completely agree. I do less exercise and more code than you, but I keep seeing that the best teams aren't run by a scrum master or product manager, but by a tech lead who can negotiate and translate requirements. It seems to produce the best results.
What's weird is that I can not find any announcement or an article mentioning this acquisition.
We wouldn't. This is a straight up math calculation. If we dedicated all arable land in the entire world to optimal food production using traditional agricultural techniques (the stuff which doesn't involve fossil fuel products), we'd only be able to generate less than 1000 calories per person. The world would starve.

Respect and honor doesn't magic food into existence.
This is the guy who still thinks a Martian colony is a good idea and that the woke mind virus is one of the most dangerous threats to society. I'm not sure he's very grounded in reality at all when it comes to the future.
I am a beginner to programming language implementation. I have a JIT compiler that compiles a language that looks similar to Javascript.

My favourite languages are Python, Java and C.

I have written 2 Rust programs. I am not sure I understand C++ "forward" and Rust's lifetimes with the apostrophe. Any explanations would be helpful.

Async Rust, traits all seem hard to understand to me. I would like to understand them better.

I like C programming because it feels simple.

With Rust it feels that everything is a fight, I haven't yet got the mental model to design Rust programs. I think I need to design programs as trees.

I can deal with * symbols and &.

I find into(), forward hard to understand.

I find C++ template syntax hard to understand, things like unique_pointer.
> Are there ADHD friendly tutorials/books on Rust?

Work your way through the Rust Book, but do it slowly.
It is all online. It is what I am doing right now.
Here is a link for you.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/
So the employees profit
Beehaw did not do that. They defederated 2 large ones because of open sign ups, and Lemmy not having other modding/admin tools available yet
Had nuclear plants been treated the way airplanes are treated, any fault in one plant would lead to steps to redesign all of them, present and future, to definitively avoid this fault; and frankly, the fact that this is not being done is such a massive fuckup that it's making me more anti-nuclear.

My pro-nuclear position is based on an assumption of baseline competence! This doesn't seem to actually be the case!