skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
pY is very much not repetition of vanilla, not only it pushes Factorio to its limits in terms of features and of course PC load (if not in the same way than the new SpaceX), part of the fun is to have MANY alternative ways to produce most of the things, then decide which one you want to use.
[Curses], yes, of course, I am missing a zero in 35,000$ and I am missing a nurse to check what I am doing, quite apparently.

BTW: that number was obtained from converting Yen to Dollars, and other figures mention instead "over 30,000$".
A link is a dynamic thing. If you print or let users download a PDF of a Wikipedia page and for the attribution you link to a page with the edit history, what happens when the link is shut down or repurposed to show something unrelated or changed so that it shows a contributor list which is not in line with reality?
I unable to log in to my paypal account, because the confirmation sms never arrives, and the only contact given is to call them. Guess I’ll never use paypal again.
One key concept when I use DoD is to not abstract away the data. Less is more.

But when quickly reading the intro text, I found it doing the opposite, it talks too much and abstracts away the key concepts. Only me who found it a bit ironic of not drinking the wine?
Innovating is "easy", getting it in production is though.
If the Google models are so genius and perfect, and nobody can use or see them, it's like if they don't exist.
I had the pleasure of escorting him around Chicago one day, and his enthusiasm was in full force. Such an amazing fellow, hearing the news of his death was a cruel blow.
So basically the same as with an answer from Stackoverflow but without the user voting.
“ There will be NO programmers in 5 years.” – EMostaque
>Large models are trained on public data scraped via API. Content-heavy sites are most likely to be disrupted (why post on StackOverflow?) by models trained on their own data. Naturally, they want to restrict access and either (1) sell the data or (2) train their own models. This restriction prevents (or complicates) Google’ automatic scraping of the data for Search (and probably for training models, too).

I've seen the other side of the coin, far too frequently. Many websites allow Googlebot to index for free, but once a person clicks on Google serach results, they ask for money.
This was based on some googling for reports with some numbers. I can't find the exact one I used to get the number but the report linked by
ahelwer in another commend has the same kind of numbers (investment in hydrocarbons was 2.6x of renewable generation: adding on top investments in switching demand to be able to use renewables, which is primarily investment in EVs, puts the number at 1.7x in 2019): https://about.bnef.com/energy-transition-investment/ https://imgur.com/B2QBY6u
First thought is that it's the most profitable users who would choose adless.

The ads industry would not like their reach to be limited to those not paying for premium search.
Yes, natural disasters happen in every state that kill thousands of people every year. A freak blizzard that plunged TX below freezing for more than a week straight, something I don't believe has ever been recorded in the state, caught the infrastructure off guard. Nature continues to throw curve balls at humanity, as ever.
It's not ableist to take issue with people who exclude qualitative considerations, especially considerations of human subjective experience and existence, from their reasoning. That's a very big and often dangerous flaw in reasoning that can cause a lot of problems, and that doesn't change even if autistic people have more of a tendency to fall into that sort of mistake. That just means it's a cognitive bias that's common for us just, like other cognitive biases (like e.g. the bandwagon fallacy) are more common for non-autistic people.

Here's my definition btw:

> it is a specific subset of the people who work in tech whose attitude towards tech is characterized by a sort of brash, prideful belief that you can solve everything with technological solutions and that the human (qualitative) factor of things just isn't relevant — or is even harmful because it's "unquantifiable" and it needs to be specifically perfected out of our considerations.
Thanks! We are certainly looking into AI capabilities but are now handful with building the right foundations that will sustain all forms of industry specific LLMs in the future.
Every EV Tesla sells is an EV another producer does NOT sell.

Tesla also has a good margin, making money on every sale. Other producers LOSE money on every sale.

It's impossible to predict the future, but it's not hard to imagine one where Tesla dominates the EV market in a pretty big way.
I mean, I’d be inclined to agree with your friend here, to an extent. A machine for confidently being wrong has rather limited practical applications.
How would this work? Google isn't an official registry, do they have an obligation to list any business?

And the privacy argument is often effectively countered with security concerns, even more so if that is expressly stated so in the ToS.

Just to be clear: I'm 100% on the GP's side, I'm just curious what the Verfügung could do here. In order for the court issue such an order, it needs at least a reasonable legal basis.
The AI trained to recognise waste for recycling
You're oversimplifying the use of continuation / builder pattern / "fluent" / monadic interfaces.

SetReadTimeout(SetWriteTimeout(SetConnectTimeout(FactoryClass.factory(), 100), 2000), 4000);

vs.

FactoryClass.factory().SetConnectTimeout(100).SetWriteTimeout(2000).SetReadTimeout(4000);

https://java-design-patterns.com/patterns/fluentinterface/
> What if Wikipedia started charging or restricting API access?

Easy, rehost it.
The ability to explain yourself clearly and precisely in the written word is a skill not much appreciated by most engineers (sadly).
I really am I favor of your suggestion. Next to that my stance is that big companies should be by law be required to have a human representative you can contact, especially in the time of AI.
Amazing, but why not something open source like LibreOffice instead ?!
Everytime I hear about Data-Driven/Oriented Design I remember a paper from OOP course I had to read in University, it used Data-Driven Design as an example how to not to do things.

The paper in question is this from 1989: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/74877.74885

It highlights that:

"Even though the goal of data-driven design is to encapsulate data and algorithms, it inherently violates that encapsulation by making the structure of an object part of the definition of the object. This in turn leads to the definition of operations that reflect that structure (because they were designed with the structure in mind). Attempts to change the structure of an object transparently are destined to fail because other classes rely on that structure. This is the antithesis of encapsulation."

Then goes to show that Responsibility-Driven Design has better approach.

What we mean with Data-Driven Design have come a long way though, and isn't comparable to those days.

I find it a bit amusing that Data-Driven Design used to be an insult of sorts, like you didn't know how to do things OOP the right way.
Seriously, once you understand the ui as a superposition of entangled complex-valued eigenstates that only collapse into place once an observer visits your page, frontend development becomes so much easier.
As a Texas resident, I’m glad that batteries and renewables are bailing us out.

Once a week or so, my utility (actually, a middleman wholesaler of power that they purchase from the actual generators, due to our deregulated electrical market structure) sends an email asking us to please limit consumption during the following day due to anticipated extraordinary demand.

My response is “get bent” - ERCOT has literally one job - grid stability - and the legislature had no business trying to attract crypto miners. So I’ll happily take advantage of the fixed priced electrical contract I entered into (nine cents a kilowatt hour) and keep my AC where I damn well please.

99% of time, it is literally my pleasure to act in pro-social ways according to the greater good, but I see no reason whatsoever why I personally should bail out the grid and state leadership from their political decisions.

I’ve spent plenty of time sitting in the cold or hot dark due to their mismanagement (probably an aggregate of about 10 days without power in the last three years), so when (if?) they’re capable of attending to the population as a whole rather than special interests, I’ll happy do my part. Until then, I’m simply going to continue to abide by the “every man for himself” ethos they’ve adopted.
The Value of Not Commuting for Work
I don't disagree with the usefulness for you particularly.

But all these things were possible before ChatGPT.
I find it kinda exciting that there is one global license. People have different interests and different tastes. Software developers may find it very exciting if Rust improved compile time by 8x for a certain, common access pattern even though, in the grand scheme of things it does not really matter.

Just let people have fun with things.
The core of Schumpeter's position here is that innovation requires making large long-term capital investments in risky projects, which small firms can't afford.

Things are somewhat different today then when Schumpeter was writing. On the one hand, governments and venture capital firms are now major sources of R&D funding. On the other hand, the growth of the financial sector has to some degree crowded out higher-risk investments within large firms.
Found an online review of the book: https://gist.github.com/seece/25ed1b2108cf5782718b026382f2c5...
Many people lose their incredulity once more than a few sentences have been read.

By the time someone has read a second paragraph, they have internalized what was at the beginning, and to be told that those two paragraphs were fiction is now to attack the reader instead of the text.

As though reading were so laborious, there's a sunk cost fallacy.
I am not Russian and can therefore do nothing effective about Russia's atrocities.

I am a subject member of the 5-eyes superstate that has been committing heinous war crimes and crimes against humanity, in my name and yours (possibly), for decades.

Therefore the imperative for you and me is to address the very real and very serious war crimes of our own people, first and foremost - before we set those very same war criminals the task of 'doing something about Russia'.

Unless you are Russian, there is nothing peaceful you can do about Russias crimes. Period. The moral authority you claim, to elevate ones own war criminals over those of other nations', is not only a fallacy but does a huge disservice to the 34 million+ victims of our own war criminals.

Stop bleating, uselessly, about Russia. Start instead calling, effectively, for the heads of your own war criminals to be presented on a platter at the ICC. Where they truly, truly belong. Only when that occurs, will the conditions for justice for Russia's victims also be in place.

Until Americans close the 1000+ black op CIA torture sites they willfully fund every single year, nobody in the rest of the free world is going to follow your endless war-crime committing classes into yet another disaster.
Ovid led the specification effort and did all the boring writing it up stuff because he wanted it to exist, Stevan Little (author of Moose) originated the idea but got distracted by real life before he got it finished, a bunch of us (including me quite a bit and even Damian Conway briefly) with a shitload of OO system design experience consulted and suggested and gave feedback.

LeoNerd (Paul Evans) I believe did a bunch of the code for both p3rl.org/Object::Pad (which was significantly an on-cpan prototype for this work) and the 'class' feature on his own time and also a bunch of it via sponsorship, though I'm less confident of the details there because since I can't write C to save my life I spent my tuits on the design and cat herding side and just assumed LeoNerd would get it right.

(the same approach worked out pretty well during the period he was doing dev work for me at https://shadow.cat/ too and we still keep an open contract with him in case we run into a LeoNerd-shaped problem, he is Just That Good IMO)
So; I think many people in our sector have a progress-bias from years of Moore's law etc. and run under the assumption that all things tech that display problems (in this case "incorrect information") will just resolve with time and progress.

People outside of tech don't necessarily think this way. So hearing that "it produces incorrect answers" is kind of a deal breaker, no?

Who is right in this case? I actually think that the LLM approach has limits that we could hit the wall of, and for that technique at least never get past the "I'm just making shit up" problem, and in fact the skeptics are quite right.

LLMs are exciting as an automatic language content generation tool, they chain words together in ways that sound like humans, and extract reasoning patterns that look like human reasoning. But they're not reasoning, it doesn't take much to trip them up in basic argumentation. But because they look like they're "thinking" some people with a tech-optimist bias get excited and just assume that the problems will resolve themselves. They could be very wrong, there could in fact be very strong limits to this approach.

... More worrisome is if LLMs because omnipresent despite having this flaw, and we just accept bullshit from computers the way we seemingly now accept complete bullshit from politicians and businessmen....
Digitally interconnected .. means a way to connect multiple sections and documents across an entire project environment. Currently with MS Word, the idea is to produce static files siloed in the 4 corners of the page. With script, you no longer write on 'paper' but in a dedicated workspace which opens doors to a wide array of 'context-aware' possibilities.
> Show HN: Python can make 3M+ WebSocket keys per second

> This article is about optimizing a tiny bit of Python code by replacing it with its C++ counterpart.

So it's C++ rather than Python.
Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
And for production lines, you have plenty of mods that can do the math for you : Helmod / Factory Planner, Actual Craft Time, Rate Calculator...
> Is your data layout defined by a single interpretation from a single point of view?

I think this might be the most important question at technology selection and architecture time. Answering it usually requires talking to the business and customers.

If you are certain there is exactly 1 valid "view" of the data that will be used throughout, then perhaps enshrining it in code makes sense. If you are even a tiny bit uncertain of this, a relational-style model probably works better. SQL is the end game for most businesses once they realize the game theory around this one...

I am curious what HN thinks as major reasons for why everyone seems to have moved away from 1 big SQL database. From my perspective, yeah we have "web scale" edge cases that threaten vertical scalability on writes, but most businesses will never touch this, including members of the F100.
Bear in mind that for every Wright Brother, there’s a Ferdinand Von Zeppelin. Most heavily hyped technologies don’t have a huge long-term impact.
Wut? When did they run out of funding? The last half year has seen two major updates. If this is the pace they set when run by the community I can totally live with it.
Russia Seeds a Surveillance Supply Chain
There's no point to running antiques any more, not when, for example, you can buy a reproduction PDP11/70 front panel that runs on a Raspi runnig an emulator running genuine V7 Unix!
The true meta problem here is the age old question of how to fund services, including search, on the web. Google, Twitter, Reddit, Gfycat are all immediate variants of the same problem, which does not have a technological solution. The naive idea that all these things can be free, especially when promoted by those in an ecosystem as propped up as it is by ad revenue, is ridiculous.

Someone has to pay for these things to be developed and operated and typically when they do they get to call the shots, which leads to the modern UX disaster.

At least now the VC situation means we have a lot less product-dumping-by-any-other-name intended to destroy the market for legitimate participants.
>Low pause GCs (ZGC, Shenadoah) for Java are not generational yet.

They are. GenZGC is merged into mainline and got into the latest JDK, GenShenandoah didn't manage but will be in next release.

>The problem of GC pauses is solved only if you can afford to waste 5x-20x more memory than the app is really using

I don't think that is true. ZGC uses multi-mapping in order to dereference its colored pointers, this causes some tools to report excessive memory usage but nothing actually hits RAM.
I've been reading a lot of reports recently about how businesses abuse AirBnb and Google Maps reviews by forcing the companies to remove them on technicalities or by outright lies. I wonder if I should just post any less-than-stellar reviews without any text but with rating only in order to make it harder for them to remove. Thoughts?
You do realize that DoD has nothing to do with data-driven, right?

Data oriented design is about structure the data in regard of how it is processed and the hardware. This is opposite of object oriented design which models the data around your mental model.

For example in DoD you could design a map with keys in one array together and one array of values. This would make it much faster to iterate over keys while searching because of cache memory.

While in object oriented you would store an array of pairs.

Both approaches can use data-driven.

Edit: would -> could
I agree. They should be chatting to ChatGPT instead.
Ah, thanks, I was completely puzzled by OP's experience...
This is more the fault of DDG / Bing being awful, than it is Google doing a good job. I’ve found Kagi and Brave at worst are on par with Google without being bloated with ads. And oftentimes they’re simply better.
Years ago I set up a business PayPal account after selling through my personal for years. After taking orders, I pulled in $13k in a few days and went to pay my suppliers, only to find PayPal had frozen my account for suspected fraud. I had already provided all the tax information and so on, but they insisted on freezing my account for 12 months!

Magnanimously, they allowed me to withdraw $300 per month. After 6 months, PayPal let me take out 600 per month.

In the end it took 2 years to get the money out, and I shut down the account and never touched a PayPal merchant account again.

In the meantime, I kept my business going by selling through Stripe and front loading enough sales to ship the orders for the earlier customers. Was a fun time!

So while it wasn't through eBay, like this seller, I would say he's very fortunate to reach someone in support there with a brain and common sense.
We (some of us at least) have been calling simple logic in computer games AI. And an artificial plant means some plastic shaped like a plant, it can't do photosynthesis, it can't grow, it can't reproduce. Meanwhile current AIs can code, explain a joke, etc.

After all an artifice: (the use of) a clever trick or something intended to deceive
Buying pizza with a bitcoin? Is that the only use case you can come up with?

Electronic money, instead of paper or coins, is there to stay. However, bitcoin is a very poor implementation of this. The mining alone has contributed significantly to the earth's yearly electricity consumption.
Reply:

>Comment on the Feasibility of Carbon Burning in Betelgeuse

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2515-5172/acdb7a
I've said it before, but the node build tool ecosystem looks like any project in any language where no one was around to tell a bright young developer "no"
Sweden’s Debt-Laden Landlords Veer Closer to Forced Sales
In fact this community Alt-F4 has started after the weekly FFFs stopped, because people were missing it so much !
Outside In – How to turn a sphere inside out (1994) [video]
You're welcome to use the Google SSO, handled by.. Google. Hopefully this gives you a bit more assurance.
You are making things harder than they are. I ship the representation to the client once (as a JS string) and then render it there as many times as I want. No SSR involved.
> I'm writing a response to you right now, and I "know" a certain amount of information about the world.

How do you know? And more importantly, how do you prove it to others? The only way to prove it is to say: "OK, you are human, I am human, each of us know this is true for ourselves, let's be nice and assume it's true for each other as well".

> But that doesn't really work for LLMs, because there's no knowledge at all.

How do you know? I know your argument saying that the LLM "is just" guessing probabilities, but surely, if the LLM can complete the sentence "The Harry Potter book series was written by ", the knowledge is encoded in its sea of parameters and probabilities, right?

Asserting that it does not know things is pretty absurd. You're conflating "knowledge" with the "feeling" of knowing things, or the ability to introspect one's knowledge and thoughts.

> As a thought experiment, imagine that you're given a book with every possible or likely sequence of coloured circles, triangles, and squares.

I'd argue thought experiments are pretty useless here. The smaller models are quantitatively different from the larger models, at least from a functional perspective. GPT with hundreds of parameters may be very similar to the one you're describing in your thought experiment, but it's well known that GPT models with billions of parameters have emergent properties that make them exhibit much more human-like behavior.

Does your thought experiment scale to hundreds of thousands of tokens, and billions of parameters?

Also, as with the Chinese Room argument, the problem is that you're asserting the computer, the GPU, the bare metal does not understand anything. Just like how our brain cells don't understand anything either. It's _humans_ that are intelligent, it's _humans_ that feel and know things. Your thought experiment would have the human _emulate_ the bare metal layer, but nobody said that layer was intelligent in the first place. Intelligence is a property of the _whole system_ (whether humans or GPT), and apparently once you get enough "neurons" the behavior is somewhat emergent. The fact that you can reductively break down GPT and show that each individual component is not intelligent does not imply the whole system is not intelligent -- you can similarly reductively break down the brain into neurons, cells, even atoms, and they aren't intelligent at all. We don't even know where our intelligence resides, and it's one of the greatest mysteries.

Imagine trying to convince an alien species that humans are actually intelligent and sentient. Aliens opens a human brain and looks inside: "Yeah I know these. Cells. They're just little biological machines optimized for reproduction. You say humans are intelligent? But your brains are just cleverly organized cells that handles electric signals. I don't see anything intelligent about that. Unlike us, we have silicon-based biology, which is _obviously_ intelligent."

You sound like that alien.
Not by default, they don't. I recently got a Macbook from work, an M1 running the latest macOS, and there is no middle-click. There is no built-in function to enable it, either.

This being the Mac world, there's a well-known commercial tool to provide it:
https://middleclick.app/

I found a FOSS equivalent:
https://github.com/artginzburg/MiddleClick-Ventura