skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No. You can say that Common Lisp and Racket are deliberately designed around macros. In Haskell, Rust, C++, they have been bolted on to the language as an after thought. Unless I am mistaken, those languages do not have the ability to write DSLs interactively, unlike Common Lisp.
Its probably common for people to have procrastination problems when working remotely, especially those who are younger and haven't got sufficiently frustrated with their own procrastination and failure to deliver, to address it and develop more self discipline yet. To address the exact Q though - how about pick a 1-point story off the "Refined and Ready" column or whatever you call it, and get that into UAT / Code Review, then at least you got something to show however small. Doing that tends to lead you to, er, start getting on with your other work. ;)
Glad to hear from Dynamicland; the last video got me so excited I decided to try and build a demo for tinkering with at home: https://github.com/deosjr/elephanttalk

Only dependency is on openCV through GoCV, otherwise pure Go. Supports a webcam/beamer setup. Uses Lisp for scripting instead of Lua (see https://github.com/deosjr/elephanttalk/blob/main/cmd/elephan...).

It's a lot slower/less mature than paperprograms, but it does attempt to implement the wish/claim/when model using a homebrew datalog implementation :)
And that's not even the enterprise version!

In every tier there are $49/month "core" users (basic dashboard viewing, no editing, no APM, no monitoring, no tracing...)

In the "Standard" tier you have $99/month "full" users, but you're limited to 5 total users, no SSO, and AFAIK very basic support.

In the "Pro" tier you have $418.80/month "full" users

In the "Enterprise" tier you have $658.80/month "full" users

No wonder people is paying for core users and then juggling generic full users. Although they limit you at 3 concurrent sessions at the same time, and monitor that, and will contact you if you login from different IPs and browsers to the same users.

The most interesting part for me is Pixie... but you can do that for free.
also upon further inspection, it appears as though ai-explain was not added by the core team or MDNs steering team. It looks like someone just took it upon themselves to add it, without doing DD on the feature, if true, its not surprising it doesnt work well.
There's a general "bad" when law are enacted and then not enforced, especially if it's a law that most people would naturally break because it's a silly law. It allows the authorities to persecute chosen individuals while not actually achieving anything that the law as written looks like it should be trying to achieve.

And this is a silly law. Everyone will break it, every time they use an encrypted communication, which is pretty-much every single thing one does on the internet these days. It's a perfect recipe for the authorities to let everyone carry on as normal, then when they want to crush someone they're certain to find some law that they have broken like this one.

We should be throwing out such laws.
In lots of VC funded companies I always miss a basic pricing for users that don't need much but don't want to use a free tier that will probably dissapear in a year or two when the VC gets nervous.
NASA has had a failure once in every 55 manned flights, SpaceX has had 10 manned flights
First paragraph corrects the headline: 's/Older men/Middle-aged and older men/'

12th paragraph notes that the researchers tried to compensate for other factors, such as age and chronic illness.

With all the complex things which can cause lack of interest, or perhaps cause men to under-report their interest...I don't think this research actually tells us anything new. Sure, "have you long interest..." is a good public health screening question. But if the patient says "yes, I've lost..." - there are probably multiple reasons, and 2/3 those are not MD stuff, but MSW. (Or public policy, or ...)
Hopefully you had backups?
The Cybersecurity Crisis and what it means for Organizational Psychology [pdf]
First problem: power and connectivity - you can't have wires dangling from inside your skull or eyes.

Second, that _completely_ ignores touch, which is the largest of the senses. There's a reason car companies are going back to knobs!
Cloud Development Environments
Welcome to Lisp.
> if you follow these rules, you will mostly end up with reasonable market-rate returns.

which is good enough. You do not need to have outsized returns.
And you think manufacturers of vaccines are trying to kill us?
Lmao, this is like the time the furry posted about getting a job at NASA and excitedly told someone to "suck their dick and balls" and that person turned out to be on the NASA council (https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/nasa-internship-twitte...).

It worked out in the end as he correctly surmised that she was just young, dumb and excited and tried to work to get her the position back. However the crappy side of furries (well anybody online) targeted the poor dude even though he was completely correct to call her out on her language.

As a furry myself I completely separate it from work, why someone would ever mention work or any other professional part of their lives on a "I like cartoon animals" account is beyond me. It's easy to be necessarily vicious and reactive/emotional online and I do it all the time myself, but I never involve my job.

Perhaps it's a context problem, being used to particular environments, say professional & unprofessional, when someone makes the mistake of being unprofessional in their unprofessional environment (their personal Twitter) but there are links to the professional environment (colleagues on Twitter) then trouble happens.

OP was big-headed and was posting all this conference shit from their personal Twitter account looks like. They should've been posting it from a work account and not gone off the rails. If they want to bitch about the DoD fine, I can totally understand, but do it on personal account and don't involve your work/job in any way. Explain what you don't like about the DoD rather than "fuck you".
Depends on who does the comparison. And what is important to them. The Microsoft investor might say "I'm fine with the price going up and down a bit in the short term. Reducing that is not worth it for me to miss out on 50% of the ROI".

If you say Berkshire's performance is significantly exceptional when including those aspects in a combined performance indicator, then it is up to you to show that.
The image is clickable.
You're right, it's missing the RSS feed. I wanted to add it but the last couple of months were really tough personally. Hopefully, I'll get some time soon to address it. Thanks for taking the interest!
> the professionals have a tremendous information advantage over the retail investor.

but do these traders beat the market on average though?
There is also the very high profile Taipei crash [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransAsia_Airways_Flight_235
Africa had people, North, South and Central America had people too at that time.
> Block Cloning is not limited to cloning blocks within the same dataset. It is possible (and very useful) to clone blocks between different datasets.

But this is already a great advance, I love it :)
Yes, the big AC's like EAC, BattleEye and a few others have optional support for proton and is simple to enable.

But many other AC's like EA's Ricochet, Vanguard or Faceit AC don't support proton at all.
So KDE which lets you do what you want out of the box (vertical taskbar) with one setting change is not good for vertical taskbars but GNOME that doesn't have that baked in at all and requires a 3rd party extension to that is a better choice?

Oh and you'll still have the horizontal activity bar on GNOME too.
Inadvertently eager Clojure gave me a memory leak – `sequence` and `mapcat`
Naively mixing lazy-seqs and transducers in 'just a quick Clojure data transformation script', with unfavourable results. Hope it saves someone a trip down a rabbit hole!
No even for buy and hold investors. The best investors get only 55% of the bets right. Only a little better than a coin toss. The only reason the performance for them is better than the 55% metric would suggest is because they cut losses on losers early and push on winners.
The difference between IPv4 addresses and taxi medallions is that IPv4 addresses are a finite resource and taxi medallions are an outright scam.
Lossy Image Formats
But the LLM won't say "please be careful, this is a modified version of Gigachad's post that you can read at <link>", will it?

Don't you see a difference between 1) a human reading your blog post, understanding it, making their own opinion, and then sharing it under their name and 2) a machine taking your blog post as an input and distributing a modified version of it?

Let's take two examples:

First example: I create a blog that copy-pastes your posts to the word, but I don't give any kind of attribution, and I get money from it. Would you be fine with that, or would you consider that I should not be able to do it, because I am basically selling your copyrighted work without authorization?

Second example: I do exactly the same as above, but I have a small script that will replace some words with synonyms. Is it now better than the previous example?

Where do you put the limit? If the script is so good that you can't recognize your post anymore, then you find it okay? But that's still an automated script that just duplicates your blog and benefits from it, right?
I am glad he's still doing it but I am not very optimistic that a tangible computer built for children and laymen will lead anywhere good.

Even getting professional programmers to reason correctly about their program is hard. And getting them to not build "intuitive" tangles that devolve into complete spaghetti is even harder.

Everything I know tells me that the software we consider good and intuitive actually requires an enormous amount of unintuitive design and engineering to pull off. Not appreciating this, and not knowing what you don't know, is a plague in modern application development, the kind which makes people boot up Windows 3.1/NT and remark how utterly instant everything is.
Who is "we"? Do you represent the site? It seems most of the readers of my comment took it as it was intended. Thought provoking, not flamewar inducing.

Would I say the same thing on YouTube or reddit? Of course not. That would end in a flamewar in milliseconds, but this is HN. I expect (and I wasn't disappointed) than HN readers can discuss divisive topics without any flames.
Thanks for the explanation.

It's silly that vendors don't have a tool for this (or maybe one vendor does, but doesn't advertise it well).

I don't personally don't use tapes, but it's good of you to share this script.
How is trust in the scientific community not belief? If you aren't checking their claims directly, then it's just that you believe them and others don't.

BTW it's not really trust in the scientific community. There are lots of scientists calling foul on this kind of story. What happens is, we get told they're the wrong kind of scientists, or "fringe" or whatever. It's social signalling all the way down and the message is Follow The Science.
I don't dispute that, but I thought you were having C++ with threads as the starting point, in which case Rust very much gives you valuable guarantees.
I am replying to the commenter saying it was cloudy on Monday, not to the article (which I did read). But maybe I'm missing something.
> Plenty of evidence contradicts the efficient market hypothesis

name some.

I think the market is quite close to, but not perfect. There's _some_ places where you can eck out an edge, but it's very slight.
Flat? I don't think so. I'm at a coffee shop and looking around me, this is very different from just 20 years ago. People with laptops and smaetphones around me. Just 20 years ago, that same place saw a few CS major nerds with their laptops, everybody else sat with a book or some paper to write on or reading a paper newspaper. Still with a latte, but tech has changed everybody's life dramatically in 20 years. 20 years from now I'm again expecting at least as big a change.

Definitely exponential.
I have long had a theory for why Stadia handled CP77 so well compared to the other platforms. CDPRs management of CP77s development was, to put it mildly, less than ideal and any extensive period of crunch will always come at the detriment of the employer's health (both mental and physical) and the quality of the end product. Personally, I always view crunch on any project as a failure, most often by management.

CDPR higher-ups though, in large part fueled by experiences with similar situations that lead to success in the past[0], were unconcerned by. If the situation had stayed similar to The Witcher 3s last few months of development, CP77 would have potentially still released in a less than perfect state (considering W3s bugs at launch, new technology, more SKUs, less dev time overall and any form of crunch, in my opinion, being a failure in itself), but likely not nearly as bad as what we ended up getting. COVID-19 happened though, as we all know, and that had its fair share of consequences for everyone and everything involved.

What I'd like to focus on are dev kits. PC gaming has the up- and downsides that come with flexible hardware choices, leading to consoles generally having more targeted optimization and often receiving more testing. But when dev kits are inaccessible due to agreements with manufacturers, those become impossible.

Stadia though, for all its flaws, had two key advantages in the work-from-home world. Whilst physical devkits exist for Stadia, they also offered the ability to access development environments via the internet[1]. Because Stadia was a targeted platform with one specific, testable hardware configuration (like a console), but allowed development and QA from anywhere with a decent internet connection, that likely explains why the Stadia version at launch was more playable and stable than any console SKU or PC experience.

There was, as far as I know, never any public confirmation of this speculation and as Stadia has seized to be, we will likely never know, but this always seemed like a reasonable assumption to me.

[0] https://www.eurogamer.net/cd-projekt-red-this-approach-to-ma...

[1] https://developers.google.com/stadia-dev/cloud-identity-gsui...
the equivalent threaded code wouldn't need a mutex either:

int foo = 1;
std::thread ([&] { foo+=1; }).join();
foo+=1;
std::cout <<foo <<'\n';

(sorry for the C++, I don't speak much rust).
It probably helps whenever you deal with officials. Doing graphical things with computer (computer games?) vs. participating in something recognized by UNESCO as cultural heritage. That should open some doors, if you are planning to do an event or course around it.
2023, year of the IPv6 for residential users? :)
Thank you for taking the time to write this. Best comment I've read on HN this past week.
Thanks for that, it looks useful and yes still valid!
Even to the latest 737s in fact.

Boeing has successfully lobbied for an exception to having to install EICAS systems specifically to avoid having to re-train and re-certify pilots.

And this was after they murdered hundreds of people in order to achieve the same goal with the 737MAX.

The author mentions this in another article about the infamous British Midland flight: https://admiralcloudberg.medium.com/lefts-rights-and-wrongs-...

> And yet, despite this fact, the Boeing 737 still does not come with an EICAS. 737s are rolling off the assembly line at this very moment without the system. This is because adding an EICAS would disrupt the continuity between the various 737 models, forcing pilots to receive separate type ratings for 737s with EICAS and those without. This feature of the 737 series is so fundamental that when a rule requiring EICAS on new models certified in the US came into effect at the end of 2022, Boeing and 737 operators lobbied Congress to grant an exemption, allowing the FAA to finish certifying the new 737 MAX 10 and MAX 7 without an EICAS. The pressure was immense: after all, major airlines didn’t want to buy the MAX 10 and MAX 7 if their pilots would have to acquire a new type rating to fly them, and if the airlines weren’t going to buy the models, then Boeing wasn’t going to build them, resulting in job losses and a shortage of narrow body airliners on the market. As a result, in the immediate future, 737s will continue to fly around the world without the benefit of EICAS, even though nearly every other modern airliner now has the system. There were of course compelling reasons behind the exemption, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a trade-off.

Of course those arguments are BS anyway, the airlines are not going to stop buying airliners just because of some type rating requirements. It's not as if they have any choice. Boeing is just worried they'll buy Airbus instead.
Ask HN: ZFS users with SSDs, will you move to BCacheFS when it is merged?
BCacheFS has some of the same characteristics as ZFS such as copy on write and data integrity aspects as well. It's also, apparently, built with SSDs in mind.

I'm curious if ZFS homelabbers (and even production shops) running mostly SSDs (I'm on a U.2 P4600 6.4TB intel SSD) will move to it over ZFS even though at launch it might not have feature parity with ZFS.
You are right :). I jumped to the comments section.
and also, the millions who _do_ share these traits but fail(ed) at investing.
The thing with the law, is that you use whatever you can to win the argument.

But reasonably, I would assume that the humans who see a problem with AI are not bothered by the fact that some text appears in some memory somewhere. They are bothered by the use of that text, which they believe goes against their copyright.
Flame diverters are heavy, and none exist on Mars. It's safer to gather as much of that data as possible before going to Mars.
I also was thinking about using this for something similar: organization. I have datasets with unorganized data dumps: photos, music, torrents...

Organizing that in shares means duplicating files...
Bush Hid the Facts
The terminal is such a relic. The only thing going for it is that it's always fast.

Every single time I use it I would prefer GUI output, and a proper scripting language like Python or JS.

For output I want datagrids with search, sort, group, filter, and expandable rows. Think about how many times you are looking at massive logs of some build and you just want to view the context of one build stage. Or you want to jump back to an error.
I wouldn’t even be opposed to this. It would perhaps be just another nail in IPv4’s coffin, and we can’t have too many of those.

Full disclosure: I do have skin in this game. I have a /32 and several /40s of IPv6 and no IPv4 at all. For a hobbyist IPv4 is already prohibitively expensive. $14k for a /24? Miss me with that bullcrap.
Can you go more over the damage? Afaik, there was dust in the surrounding area for few minutes, but it doesn't sound like damage to environment. Also this rocket used the cleanest fuel possible, so air pollution due to burning is also not a concern. So only damage I could think of is the debris that fell off in the ocean, but assuming most of the material is metal alloys, it doesn't cause much harm to environment.
> I cannot see that this was just some unfortunate misunderstanding

It obviously wasn't a misunderstanding. The story is about a person who insulted an air force official, and got fired as a result. There is no misunderstanding about this.

So the relevant question is, should programmers be fired for insulting government brass on Twitter? I would expect most of HN to say "No, they shouldn't".

But in this case, the overwhelming majority of posters is really pissed at OP for some reason, and I'm wondering why that is.

> to have flesh royal

I don't understand what this part is supposed to say?
EU antitrust licensing probe edges closer for Microsoft
I feel that as well. I'm at the point where I am knee deep in my PhD work, and I see that my commitment to that work makes me want to remove myself from other stuff. I just don't want to use any of my energy on anything else, and especially dealing with people in anything but an uncomplicated manner is the last thing I want to do. I am sure it must be doubly so if there is an audience to whatever you say and end up regret.

I have often envied how (I romanticize) it was before social media and hyper-connectivity, where you might be able to just fade out a little bit to focus on a project. Its a bit hard to get that long term focus when people expect you to be available and able to reply within the hour. Just saying "no" drains enough as it is. I don't have the backbone to put out that message though.
> If a stock looks cheap, and according to your research it is cheap, then you need to be able to ignore any market sentiment regarding that stock and buy it anyway.

and take the risk that you just overlooked something the rest of the market has priced in. But i guess to invest, one must have conviction that they're right about their investment thesis.
A great conductor once said to me, "I really like your new voice teacher, he really knows what he's doing. Not like your last voice teacher, he didn't know anything. Your first teacher was on the right path, too bad you didn't understand the message yet."

I heartily agreed the whole way through, until he revealed he had no idea who any of my teachers were. It's just that everyone feels that way.

The lesson is: blindly following a series of teachers like oracles is the way of the beginner. The path of the master is accepting that YOU are your own teacher, and everyone else is just providing tools.
These don't work at all IN a room. They need to have a direct live of sight to the sky, or else you're just radiating the IR back into the room and you achieve no net cooling.
This is precisely Emperor Cleon's storyline in the TV series Foundation...
I think they're not only an outside observer, but the only kind of observer that really matters.
One big difference is that the sources are still provided. Only the "tagging" when a release happens is not.
IPv4, the original decentralized Internet currency. Just get on IPv6 already! These numbers wouldn't be worth enough to fight over if we just upgrade.
Turning something you do for fun into something you do to survive has always been a great way to sap the enjoyment out of it.

I've been told numerous times over the years to turn my photography into a business. Or my baking. Or my cooking. Or to start music tuition. I can't think of anything I'd hate more.
Poll: Do you like Mastodon's UI?
With Twitter on it's MySpace trajectory, I have started to see more and more Mastodon posts (whose ideology I support with much fan fare) but honestly I think that it won't see much adoption outside of niche groups and techies just because of it's ugly UI. The Achilles heel of open source projects...

Sample size is low, but everyone whom I ask outside of my tech circle says that they prefer Twitter's UI because Mastodon looks kinda clunky or just ugly. And seems like some Mastodon users also agree[1]. As such, I wanted to see what the sentiment on HN is, that is, do you like Mastodon's UI?

[1]: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/19571
No, I prefer Twitter's/other's UI
Yes, I like it
Don't care, I browse it via my text-only homebrew terminal browser