skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe that’s why they won’t promote soccer in the US. 2x45 minutes of game separated by only 15 minutes. And I wish the NBA was like F1 where you pay a subscription and you have access to pretty much everything. I don’t mind sponsored labels and name drops.
Well now I don't know what to do unless we starting being capable of telekinesis. And even then, is telekinetis debris bad to consume?

It just sounds like we're picking our flavor of poison when we pack our food, something we've done since pre-historic times.
Nowhere here am I referring to this specific case and I feel like I have made it very clear that I am talking about the past.

Especially given that I mentioned cakes. The cases involving people not baking cakes or a photographer to the best my my knowledge were real cases. So while we can explain this one away we can't explain those other cases away unless you can tell me those were fake also. I can't find proof that they were.

I am simply saying that something happened. Something caused things to go so far in the other direction after a lot of progress.

We can stand up and say "trump", "desantis", or whatever else other thing that will make make us be able to point the blame somewhere else but that isn't helpful!

If we don't actually look at this and recognize possible mistakes along the way we are doomed to fail. That isn't vicim blaming.

We are in a horrible situation right now and we are continuing on a worse trend, we cannot afford to not have these hard discussions.
You say this as if memory allocation in general isn't extremely slow.
I mean a file is fundamentally an abstraction, but it's a useful one. What that abstraction means is a bit obscure under the microscope but at a high level the understanding of directories and regular files is pretty straightforward (it's streams, sockets, links, and all the other stuff that pretends to be a file in unixes that presents the problem).
Lol, "new"... Iirc, KDE almost self-destroyed by chasing the dream of making tablets; Nokia took half a decade to build a working linux-based OS (and then binned it); same for Intel...

Consumer hardware is hard to pull off, to start with. Then there are tons of components requiring closed-source drivers that don't play well with Linux; you can spend a lot of money to rewrite them, or you can build piles of weak hacks that will crash your OS every few hours. You need deep pockets to get OEMs to pay attention to your needs, rather than the needs of giant manufacturers hungry for their production lines. Managing prices on small runs is extremely hard, so your 1.0 is going to be prohibitively expensive, which means it won't sell, which means you won't have the money to fix all the problems
Is shoplifting actually increasing? Data trumps anecdotes.

Combatting it is easy, you need to pay someone to stand at the door and check receipts. But stores don't want to spend money on labor and instead just want to whine and claim there is nothing that can be done, we need to hire more police, etc. to make it someone else's problem.
While it's definitely much faster than pydantic V1 (which is a huge accomplishment!), it's still not exactly what I'd call "fast".

I maintain msgspec (https://github.com/jcrist/msgspec), a serialization/validation library which provides similar functionality to pydantic. Recent benchmarks of pydantic V2 against msgspec show msgspec is still 15-30x faster at JSON encoding, and 6-15x faster at JSON decoding/validating.

Benchmark (and conversation with Samuel) here: https://gist.github.com/jcrist/d62f450594164d284fbea957fd48b...

This is not to diminish the work of the pydantic team! For many users pydantic will be more than fast enough, and is definitely a more feature-filled tool. It's a good library, and people will be happy using it! But pydantic is not the only tool in this space, and rubbing some rust on it doesn't necessarily make it "fast".
DMT, Derealization, and Depersonalization
YouTube Premium is not available in some countries in the world. More than that, even just traveling to a country where it's not available is enough to lose the YouTube Premium features.
Sure, but they were designed with that in mind, and have presence and authentication requirements, that, as I understand, are not retro-fittable to older devices.

My claim isn’t “it’s impossible to implement a secure bootloader that also has escape hatches”. I’m saying it’s borderline impossible to do that retroactively for a fleet of obsolete devices, in a way that doesn’t compromise security of those.
@WestCoastJustin

I've been really wanting to use Go, but as you say, much of the community is Python due to the data analysis strengths. To the detriment of the other things Python does do poorly.

Can you give some thoughts with your experimentation on the following from a Go perspective.

1. Supported TA libraries in Go. I'm familiar with TAlib (python), bloom, etc.
- certain forks tailored to real time rather than historical (eg: no re-compute on ticks)

2. Data storage (article mentioned you're all in memory). I've been using S3 & ArticDB

3. If your in-data memory is treating you well for multiple TA calculations (example: in Python, you can compute & save pickled dataframes - and re-read those over longer time periods)
At least if I get an advertisement I immediately understand the biases behind whoever served it to me, with stuff like reddit or blogs I can never be sure how astroturfed it is, or whether the people reviewing things even know what they are talking about.

I'm not a proponent of advertising in the modern sense, but it's probably the least dishonest way that companies pay to promote their product. Professional reviewers are a good medium but it takes time to find those in a new space where you're not sure if their standards and preferences match yours
>You aren't going to fix behavior with tools. It takes time, discipline, probably a bunch of therapy...

I just wanted to say, this, right here, is one of the single most powerful, yet often hardest won realizations that an individual can come to.

Giving a fool the materials and means to build a house, then letting them do as thou wilt, does not a recipe for a safe structure make.

Or for a more poignant, recent example that should resonate. A deep sea submersible.
Can I ask how you got there? G^4/c^5 makes sense, but the rest loses me.

(Eventually after all the typing below I think that I traced the 32/5 and (M1*M2)^2 * (M1 + M2) to (eqn 16) in Peters & Matthews 1963 maybe? (e=0, a->r) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.435 (stick sci-hub.se in front of that if you need to). The authors take an approach comparable to the textbooks below.)

Super-quick textbook review. Practically all of them start with the quadrupole moment and try to justify an energy which is quadratic in derivatives of that while still within a linear theory. Carroll and Mathtias Blau take slightly different-from-each-other paths through the transverse-traceless TT-gauge to P = dE/dt = -2/5 \frac{G^4 M^5}{r^5} (c=1) for a circular equal-mass soft binary. Wald uses the radiation gauge and so eqn 4.4.58 looks fairly different, and comes with the amusing Waldian line "A lengthy calculation (where many terms which integrate to zero are dropped) yields the final result,". Sigh. Blau's development looks a lot like MTW, but the latter gives us .... Exercise 36.6 ("Apply the full formalism ... to a binary star system with circular orbits. Calculate ... the total power radiated; the total angular momentum radiated ..."). Gee, thanks thick textbook. FWIW, 90 seconds of that (mostly trying to make sure both sides have the same dimension rather than extracting a power in watts because bad/lazy reasons and anyway I always think you had about the right order of magnitude) doesn't take me to anything like the form of your calculation.

Rather than flip through other textbooks, let me rely on my maybe-shaky memory and say that most of them, at least the modern editions, follow the TT gauge approach and come up with an equation in a form similar to Carroll.

What stands out here is that Earth-sun has a large mass ratio and noncircular orbit, and it's not really a binary system anyway, and so will defy these textbook schemes. Secondly all of these take P in the far field, because linearization. (Compare that with your edit).

I also got way off into the weeds wanting to work with chirp mass (rather than q=m_1/m_2) which is what GW obs data analyses use because extracting the individual masses is hard. I also know a bit about EMRI BHBs (extreme mass-ratio inspiral) and in those dissipation is dealt with differently from textbooks even for soft binaries (e.g. soft->hard roughly PN & perturbative methods, EOB, GSF, numrel) absolutely none of which is of immediate practical use here.

So that's some of what motivates my question about the origin of your calculation.

ETA: I think most of what happened here is that my brain reads equations as words, and I simply forgot that I could actually rearrange teh ltteres! TGIF :-)
There is no true artificial general intelligence loose on the world today. That is an absolute fact, not a matter of opinion.
And also private. Many supermarket terminals are running SUSE.
Would anyone be interested in an article about the crusade to move JS to ESM? I've been considering writing one, here's a preview:

Sindresorus wrote a gist "Pure ESM modules"[0] and converted all his modules to Pure ESM, breaking anyone who attempted to `require` the latest versions of his code; he later locked the thread to prevent people from complaining. node-fetch released a pure ESM version a year ago that is ~10x less popular than the CommonJS version[1]. The results of these changes broke a lot of code and resulted in many hours of developers figuring out how make their projects compatible with Pure ESM modules (or decide to ignore them and use old CommonJS versions)--not to mention the tons of pointless drama on GitHub issues.

Meanwhile, TC-39 member Matteo Collima advocated a moderate approach dependent on where your module will be run [2]. So the crusade is led not by the Church, but by a handful of zealots dedicated to establishing ESM supremacy for unclear reasons (note how Sindresorus' gist lacks any justifications and how weak TFA's justifications are). It's kind of like the Python 2 to 3 move except with even less rationale and not driven by the core devs.

0 - https://gist.github.com/sindresorhus/a39789f98801d908bbc7ff3...

1 - https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-fetch?activeTab=versions

2 - https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/33954#issuecomment-924...
Go app -> TWS API (on the desktop client) -> IB

What's cool about this is that you can look at the IB TWS client and see things happening in real-time. So, it acts as sort of a sanity check. I know they have that gateway too but personally I like to look at the client all the time too. My workflow is to run the bot and the TWS client side-by-side and watch it make trades, see how things are moving, etc.
> And no, we shouldn’t be bailing out rich folks either.

Okay, but don't you think it's at least a little fucked up that we already bailed out the rich people, but we stopped there?
I think that stores would be far more willing to remove facial recognition if there was a guarantee, a social contract, that shoplifter = police on the scene immediately = arrest = minimum 30 days imprisonment regardless of object size, without bail, sentence time increases by 30 days for each repeat offense within the last three years. Problem solved; we can focus on community programs to reduce the desire to shoplift afterwards.

The facial recognition stuff is the digital equivalent of vigilante justice. The best way to stop vigilante justice of any kind is to have Police do their jobs.
??? What? I don't think so? Literally experiencing this right now...
What is h method?
For those interested in formalisation of homotopy type theory, there are several (more or less) active and developed libraries. To mention a few:

UniMath (https://github.com/UniMath/UniMath, mentioned in the article)

Coq-HoTT (https://github.com/HoTT/Coq-HoTT)

agda-unimath (https://unimath.github.io/agda-unimath/)

cubical agda (https://github.com/agda/cubical)

All of these are open to contributions, and there are lots of useful basic things that haven't been done and which I think would make excellent semester projects for a cs/math undergrad (for example).
The reverse is true as well. I traveled in India with a friend from China who used their Chinese sim card in India, and their data was censored through the firewall. Really annoying to be outside China and not able to use Google maps.
If they want to use an appeal process, they must enter the legal process and be judged, at which point an appeal is launched.
If caught by store security, they have you with the box, they have on video taking the box and walking out of the store = strong irrefutable evidence - with no receipt and that video evidence goose = cooked = fine/jail/record. SO you agree to plea and swear to never come here again and to allow they to take a number of head shots at of a number of poses so machine video can spot you. UK judges have agreed this is OK, and I think it is. Crooks and lawyers hate it because it messes with the 'take'...
Man college campuses are a warzone for bicycles.

I watched two guys riding too fast through pedestrians hit so hard one guy lost five spokes. And one day some guy coming the opposite way from me on the bike path suddenly started flipping end over end (I think his chain fell into his front wheel but I, too, was late for class so I checked for concussion and fucked off). I just managed to squeak past him but if it had happened twenty milliseconds earlier I would have been part of his drama.

After those two incidents I decided I was safer in the street. Fuckin college kids man.
Truth has long been an uncertain thing, only perhaps people didn't know that at some time. There's a saying that "history is written by the victors", and that's not even quite true. The Internet has led to an information revolution, and so matters of truth and trust are all the murkier. Practically, some people recommend consuming multiple sources of different political leanings and believing the conserved details. That only goes so far, though; I doubt there's a silver bullet. Be cautious, and wary of your own moral axioms and cognitive biases, I guess.
that is with a big 'if'. but honestly, they should. differentiate and add value. not just copy and reproduce something you can't control
Yep, laminated color copy is the way to go.
I've seen some great development environments where all of development/debugging is unbundled ESM directly in the browser. It's going to take a lot of momentum shift to swing the "bundler pendulum" back away from "always" to "as needed" (or even, shockingly, "never"), but I think it is going to happen. HTTP/2+ really does make "never" a bigger possibility than ever before, especially in cases like MPAs (and SSR SPAs that don't mind slower hydration outside certain fast paths).

Also, even some cases with bundlers, some of the modern bundlers (esbuild and swc) are still directly bundling to ESM now as the target. Lazy-loading boundaries and common/shared-code boundaries are just ESM imports and there's no "runtime emulation" there, just native browser loading at that point. They are just taking "small" ESM modules and making bigger ones.
It's gone berserk since the pandemic. CVS claims they have had a 300% increase.

https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2022/why-has-shopl...

https://www.axios.com/2022/02/11/shoplifting-retail-crisis-o...
The central argument here -- that nonhuman entities in competition with one another will develop amorally and to the detriment of human wellbeing -- is also a reason we should be worried about corporate capitalism.
Most games don't take advantage of haptics, but the ones that do have been pretty cool IME. The physical feedback made web-slinging in the new Spider-Man super fun and engaging, and Returnal used trigger pressure to switch between your weapon's main firing mode and secondary firing mode (and used audio/haptic feedback to let you know when the secondary mode was off cooldown).
Again they chose to not tell users about Premium LITE. Why?

Wouldnt it convince more people to pay? And Google can try to entice users later to upgrade to the full Premium. Would t that make sense?
The price for premium just doesn't make sense. I would buy it if it were $1 or less per month. This seems reasonable to me, how much could they possibly make off of me in a single month with ads?
The experience on the platform became so hostile to users, while content is turning into a cable tv, I wouldn't miss it, if I would be blocked.

It's not blocking an ad or two, but a full spam marathon, sometimes longer than a movie itself. Of course, it's not possible to see which movies are worth to watch, as dislikes are not visible, so more video opens, more disappointment, but also... more ads.
Excellent write-up! Is there somewhere where I can read up on all the trading jargon?

Also I wonder how can there be changes in the price of a stock after market if the exchange has closed? Isn’t the whole point that trades need to happen for stocks to get a certain value?
Do you have an email? I've been building a similar system for awhile except in F#, would love to connect.
Why not switch to Mojo lang for this? It's Python-compatible with Golang like performance from what I hear.
The trade offs happen but they aren’t the reason to say “the optimal amount of fraud is non zero”.

The correct framing is “since we accept some fraud, the optimal amount of fraud must be non-zero”.

As written, it sounds like society can only function if there is some amount of fraud.

I gave this analogy to a sibling comment of yours. Maybe it will help clarify my point. We accept some adulteration (let’s say it is 2% for conversation sake) in coffee. That’s not the same as “the optimal purity of coffee is 98%”. The optimal purity of coffee is 100% but since we can’t guarantee that some not-coffee stuff has mixed in with coffee, we live with 98%.
Billionaire bros fighting in the Colosseum… circa 2024…

Just need Jeff Bezos directing filming it from his phallic space cruiser. Bill Gates fits in somewhere too, not sure where, but he will need a seat. Maybe he can manage the SecUnit MedRepair Autobot-Tron 3000.

Who else do we send?
I don't think obviously legal. I think you're right about the standing issue, but ignoring that, if it had reached the merits without any problem with standing, I think it is not obvious that the policy fits within the bounds of the HEROES Act. I really dislike the major questions doctrine - because I think it should be up to Congress to write laws without some other body second-guessing them about which parts of those laws are or aren't "major" - but I'm also not a strict textualist and often don't find these pure text-based arguments very compelling.
Perfect combination combining the wonders of youth (video games) with the wonders of adult age (understanding and building technology).
That's weird, are you looking only at the top 10 countries?

I've reproduced dwaltrib's results using World Bank data on 251 countries, and I get a Pearson's r of 0.82 and a p value of 5.6e-61 (!). I.e. a strong correlation, with high confidence. It makes sense too -- larger countries generally have more people, and more people generally generate more economic activity.

Code if you want to try yourself:

import pandas as pd

gdp = pd.read_csv("~/Downloads/API_NY.GDP.MKTP.CD_DS2_en_csv_v2_5551501.csv").set_index("Country Name")

land_area = pd.read_csv("~/Downloads/API_AG.LND.TOTL.K2_DS2_en_csv_v2_5552158.csv").set_index("Country Name")

gdp["GDP"] = gdp["2020"]

gdp["Land"] = land_area["2020"]

gdp = gdp.dropna(subset=["GDP", "Land"])

from scipy import stats

print(stats.pearsonr(gdp.Land, gdp.GDP))

#+RESULTS:
: PearsonRResult(statistic=0.8151313879150333, pvalue=5.621180589722219e-61)
Imagine people uploading deepfakes of people they don't like shoplifting. Apparently any of the participating shops can deposit video into the system...
I seem to remember N64 joysticks were somewhat fragile. Many of my friends as a kid had controllers with a joystick that had lost all springiness and barely responded to input.

I have not are that on any other controllers, even cheapo xbox360 clone controllers from AliExpress.
No, not really. That's life... you're taking a risk.

Taking a risk just driving a car, I don't get why you can't take a risk with a medicine.
Seems like the lisps are already both as written, and any language that can be rendered as an s-expression is either.
Or buy another one so you can work on one and wait for the other. Or you could spend that time shopping for an even better device, even maybe from another manufacturer.
I wish we could get rid of this system by getting rid of the demand for it. Stores wouldn't need things like this if career shoplifters got sent to prison.
Yes. But I think there is something problematic about that, in of itself. Old money isn't any more acceptable just because they (supposedly) have better aesthetics. In fact, on the face of it, there is a lot to congratulate the nouveau rich, relative to old money, don't you think? In most cases, they worked for it.
Kagan's dissent says everything that needs to be said.

> That is why the
Court is supposed to stick to its business—to decide only
cases and controversies (but see supra, at 3–13), and to stay
away from making this Nation’s policy about subjects like
student-loan relief. The policy judgments, under our separation of powers, are supposed to come from Congress and
the President. But they don’t when the Court refuses to
respect the full scope of the delegations that Congress
makes to the Executive Branch. When that happens, the
Court becomes the arbiter—indeed, the maker—of national
policy. See West Virginia, 597 U. S., at ___ (KAGAN, J., dis-
senting) (slip op., at 32) (“The Court, rather than Congress,
will decide how much regulation is too much”). That is no
proper role for a court. And it is a danger to a democratic
order.
Oh, sorry. I was referencing the OP comment there.

> 3 screens like that, put the middle (primary) one in landscape, so the array is like a big H.
Apple's 'Next Trillion' Valuation Will Be Challenging
Wonder if they'd weigh in differently on PPP loan forgiveness. I have a feeling we'll be filing a lot of SCOTUS news stories in the next decade or so into the "tragic, but unsurprising" drawer.

EDIT: Yes, bad example, given the replies. The fact that PPP was written into law as a deliberate wealth transfer is what's "tragic, but unsurprising" not what a theoretical SCOTUS opinion on it would be. I'm wrong. I guess if people were smart, they would have taken out a PPP loan to pay off their student loans!
How are people being added to the database? Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? How is abuse prevented in this system? There absolutely should be an open review and appeal process.

After that: If you're homeless, you can't get groceries delivered. In a food desert you might not have alternatives.

I personally believe shoplifting is not as bad as is being portrayed recently and this a solution in search of a problem.
It’s not really a “hot take” since this is the main reason why the web designer filed the lawsuit to being with lol.

But I understand what you’re saying.
CloudLinux OS 8 and 9 in post RedHat world
Luckily, the Xbox controller fundamentals have changed relatively little since the move from the Duke to the S controller during the life of the original xbox. I say luckily, because I feel they got pretty close to the optimum design around then, and later enhancements have been about mostly shuffling the battery components around.
The garden wall just grew a few more feet.

from the vantagepoint of Twitter, the glass-half-full view is it will force idle browsers to serve up their data by forcing them to create accounts. But the glass-half-empty view they seem to be ignoring is the out of sight, out of mind principle. The less exposure to the larger public conversation, the less we will think about twitter, the less we will wonder what people are saying on it.