skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Copyright just doesn't protect such cases. There's a funny exaggeration that is very illustrative: copyright protects the bugs in the code. I.e. the specific way in which code was written. Reading it and getting inspired was never meant to break copyright.

What protects particular solutions is patents. For example if someone were to obtain a patent for computing GCD of large integers the usual fast way, well then everyone else would have to use a different solution.

This analogy to someone reading a book, perhaps peppered with lots of legalese to the point of being hardly recognizable, will definitely be used in courts at some point. And I can't see how it wouldn't stand as a valid argument.
In Hamilton, purpose built rental apartment buildings have a way higher mill rate than condo buildings (even when individual units are rented out) or single family houses. Tyranny of the single family homeowner majority.
Something else that isn't really factored into most of these conversations is the level of gatekeeping around professions and schools where a much larger group of people can succeed or even flourish, yet never get the opportunity due to limited class sizes.

Around the healthcare debate specifically, there were a lot of people who talked about the restrictive policies that artificially limit the supply of doctors as well as the policies that prevent the creation of more hospitals.

When my dad was growing up, his father was a mechanic and he really just wanted to go be a mechanic to work with his dad...who told him that it wouldn't support 2 families. So instead...my dad became a dentist. Don't get me wrong, he's very smart (particularly with math) but how many people could be doctors? How many people could handle the curriculum at MIT, Harvard, Stanford, Georgia Tech, Vanderbilt, etc?

My guess is that it's a whole lot more than are actually admitted. Further, is the curriculum at these schools that much better than everywhere else or is it more a factor of surrounding yourself with highly motivated peers that makes it better?
Theoretically it's impossible to travel through space at or more than speed of light. But space itself can move faster than light speed, and a warp drive would help something similar that you mentioned. That is possible theoretically. But the amount of energy or mass it needs is very high and no current technology (or in foreseeable future) can achieve it. So FTL remains a dream.

My hunch based on nothing is that we will achieve FTL no earlier than 2250.
My IRL experience with pure functional code in academia was so unpleasant that I have since strived to stay as far away from it as I possibly can.
Average knowledge of History is sadly quite low, as intended by elites keen to keep our imagination very tame in terms of political possibilities. I try to fight it in the home front of my mind and I try to help anyone who seeks to learn more.
The police in your area doesn't do anything about swapped or stolen plates? It's odd since they seem to be the group that would care most about the accuracy of plates matching the car.
The more reality denying part is when you ignore that age is calculated on distance and not counting.
There are different opinions on affirmative action, and I have to admit assessing people based on what group they are member of, even if your intentions are good, really doesn't sound that good to me.

I can recommend Thomas Sowell book on the subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_Action_Around_the_...
> the aircraft are designed to handle the stress.

I wonder how the runway fares after this.
But at least the did supported eGPU on intel max - maybe not Cuda but metal, OpenGL, OpenCL. Now eGPU is gone as well in Apple silicon even though we latest MacBook Pro supports TB 4.0
The push for RTO is one of the factors that is making me seriously consider leaving the industry. Not the biggest factor, but a factor nonetheless.
Many may not be aware of this, but signals through fiber optic cables actually propagate more slowly than through copper. Fiber carries bits at about 0.67 the speed of light in a vacuum.

https://www.commscope.com/globalassets/digizuite/2799-latenc...
I use custom fork of AOSP Messaging (on local LineageOS/microG build) with some minor UI tweaks and bugfixes. I have tried all other messaging apps on F-Droid, but every single one of them was broken in some way (mostly regarding MMS support or notifications while in deep sleep) or was missing a key feature (like delivery notifications).

The problem with MMS is that there is no built in system-level support for the protocol on Android, and due to legacy of 3G network/WAP, the protocol is quite odd when compared to modern alternatives.
Show HN: Open-source code search with OpenAI's function calling
We're excited to share a tool we've been working on called gpt-code-search. It allows you to search any codebase using natural language locally on your machine. We leverage OpenAI's GPT-4 and function calling to retrieve, search, and answer queries about your code.

All you need to do is to install the package with `pip install gpt-code-search`, set up your `OPENAI_API_KEY` as an environment variable, and start asking questions with `gpt-code-search query <your question>`.

E.g. You can ask questions like "How do I use the analytics module?" or "Document all the API routes related to authentication."

This is still early and hacked together in the past week, but we wanted to get it out there and get feedback.

We utilize OpenAI's function calling to let GPT-4 call certain predefined functions in our library. You do not need to implement any of these functions yourself. These functions are designed to interact with your codebase and return enough context for the LLM to perform code searches without pre-indexing it or uploading your repo to a third party other than OpenAI. So, you only need to run the tool from the directory you want to search.

The functions currently available for the LLM to call are:

`search_codebase` - searches the codebase using a TF-IDF vectorizer

`get_file_tree` - provides the file tree of the codebase

`get_file_contents` - provides the contents of a file

These functions are implemented in `gpt-code-search` and are triggered by chat completions. The LLM is prompted to utilize the search_codebase and get_file_tree function as needed to find the necessary context to answer your query and then loops as needed to collect more context with the get_file_contents until the LLM responds.

A couple of limitations of this approach, GPT cannot load context across multiple files in a single prompt since we are passing in the contents of a single file in each function call. So, GPT repeatedly calls the get_file_contents function to load context from multiple files. This increases the latency and cost of the tool.

Another thing we realized as we were building is that the level of search and retrieval is limited by the context window, which refers to the scope of the search conducted by the tool, meaning that we can only search five levels deep in the file system and can only pass in the contents of one file at a time. So it would be best to run the tool from the package/directory closest to the code you want to search.

We plan to add support for local vector embeddings to improve search and retrieval. Combining the vector embeddings with function calling should result in much faster and higher quality results.

Also, support for other models, chat interactions in the command line, and generating code is already on our backlog!

Please check out gpt-code-search and let me know your thoughts, feedback, or suggestions.
I just started brewing my own tea and coffee, unsweetened. Snack foods are a bit harder, but we are better off eating whole fruits and vegetables anyway.
You sent your content to them in response to their HTTP requests. That sure looks like affirmative consent to me.
I wonder what the minimum size is to be worried about. Presumably we are going to find higher insurance premiums for installs that need to be regularly repaired due to hail damage. I think my own home gets what I would consider "car damaging" hail once every 3 years.
> Whereas the original discovery spotted waves originating from the collision and merger of two star-sized black holes, the most likely source of the latest finding is the combined signal from many pairs of much larger black holes — millions or even billions of times the mass of the Sun — slowly orbiting each other in the hearts of distant galaxies. These waves are thousands of times stronger and longer than those found in 2015, with wavelengths of up to tens of light years. By contrast, the ripples detected since 2015 using a technique called interferometry are just tens or hundreds of kilometres long.

Seems like they probably know where these are coming from. I imagine, like your boat analogy, that we can observe massive natural oceans swells and wouldn't notice the wake of a boat as it moves across the ocean.
They aren't legislating from the bench. Legislating from the bench is the opposite of what is being done here. The role of the judicial is to look at laws and actions and determine if they're legal within the meta framework. That is what was done here.
Open Sourcing Shopify's Ruby Builds
So lets talk about android - does it something like that automatic? Remember location when bluetooth is disconected sound nice.
Wearing a seatbelt doesn't prevent you from dying in a car accident, guess we might as well stop that too, sounds useless to me.
That’s super sad. I have a lifetime subscription to the magazine my grandfather got for me when I was seven.
So you’re saying I’m right except in some narrowly carved-out situations. And I agree with you.
One of my favorite tech conferences, All Things Open, is actually a B Corp[1]. Pretty cool.

1. https://www.bcorporation.net/en-us/find-a-b-corp/company/all...
They have their own browser, the Orion browser, to funnel people onto their search engine.

Their search engine is also better than google for me for most use cases already, it has a clean and smart design with well thought out features that add value.

I hate that Orion is not cross platform and limited to apple ecosystem.

With that said it is native and my default choice for macOS and iOS.

No telemetry, ad blocker built in, performant and supports extensions from chrome and firefox - on iOS too.

Hands down the best native tree style tabs of any browser on the market on top of that and easy tab syncing.

It’s still in development but it’s stable enough for me to be my main browser.

These two products show some serious technical ability from a small team. I bet on companies who invest in and show technical ability over those with VC money, big names focused on marketing and growth.
If anything major comes out of this, is probably EVEN MORE prompts and popups asking for permission to use your data. even with GDPR, data collection and sales never stopped, it just made things more annoying by transforming every webpage into a granular term of service to continue doing the same.

It isn't even turned off by default. Many sites just give you an "i accept" button or even if you want to manage the preferences, the "accept all choices" button is where the "confirm my choices" should be.

Bigger companies will just append this to their TOS and push it down the customer's throat. That if MS doesn't settle out of court and the case gets thrown together with any major oppositon to the data mining
Yes. Taking it further, writing isn't just how you express your thinking; the writing IS the thinking.
The people who stay in the plan are the low risk group, obviously there will be some percentage of churn in the first year.
Good question (meaning I don't know :)

For my specific purposes it has always been good enough to apply some simple heuristics. But that wouldn't have been possible without access to post rendering information, which only a real browser (https://pptr.dev) can reliably produce.
> Surely there is a market for such a device. 1% of a billion is a big number.

>* Are manufacturers a cartel and won't allow breaking the duopoly? (Doesn't seem plausible, Samsung toyed with Tizen)

I don't think it's a simple duopoly, but an application of Conway's law across the whole globalized tech industry [1]. Keep in mind that originally Android was the open source option, and it's been gradually become less and less amenable to that.

In my mind, I think of the "progress" of the consumer electronics industry (especially in the last 20 years) as undergoing constant and aggressive "distillation" process, converting people away from the FOSS side of the spectrum which offers freedom and control towards the locked down centralization side which offers dependence, convenience, and safety. The 1% market is basically the left over Azeotrope that can't quite be gotten rid of.

The experiments to harness that 1% market are the exception that proves the rule. Locked down centralized solutions are optimal for the tech market as it exists today. Samsung thought they could squeeze some money out of the 1% by being the "master" of Tizen, but realized that the game theory works out such that they would be better off as a servant of Android.

On top of all that, I think as the smartphone capture gets deeper and deeper, being in 1% is not even necessarily a 1-to-1 for FOSS values anymore. I used to fantasize about having a cool handheld Linux computer I could control freely. Now I'm more obsessed than ever about avoiding globalized tech, but I just don't care about smartphones anymore. I carry around an iPhone as the mark of the beast, but at least (I tell myself) I don't let it into my soul.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_law
Spring Creek Fire in Western Colorado at 2,577 acres
Suppose you're a weaver. It's hard, fiddly work, and you have to get your timing and your tension just right to make quality material. Now, there are mechanised looms that can do the job faster (though the quality's not great: they could still do with some improvement, in your opinion). From this efficiency gain, who should reap the profits?

Suppose you're a farmer. You've been working on your tractors for decades, and have even showed the nice folk at John Deere how you do it. Now they've built your improvements into the mass-produced models, and they say you can't work on your tractors any more. Who should reap the profits?

Suppose you're a writer. You've spent a long time reading and writing, producing essays and articles and books and poems and plays, honing your craft. You've got quite a few choice phrases and figures of speech in your back pocket, for when you want to give a particular impression. Now, there is a great big statistical model that can vomit your coinages (mixed in with others') all over the page, about any topic, in mere minutes. Who should reap the profits?

Suppose you're a visual artist. You enjoy spending your time making depictions of fantasy scenes: you have a vivid imagination, and, so you can make a living illustrating book covers and the like. You put your portfolio online, because why not? It doesn't hurt you, it makes others happy, and maybe it gets you an extra gig or two, now and then. Except now, there's a great big latent diffusion model. Plug in “Trending on Artstation by Greg Rutkowski”, and it will spit out detailed fantasy scenes, photorealistic people, the works. Nothing particularly novel, but there was so much creativity and diversity in your artwork, that few have the eye to notice the machine's subtle unoriginality. Who should reap the profits?
To your first question, it would incentivize training of models on one's own data exclusively -- companies could train something like Copilot on their own code, for instance. To your second question, there's no way to have an international policy like this so yes each jurisdiction would do it independently -- just as they do with thousands of other similar things.
> My hunch based on nothing is that we will achieve FTL no earlier than 2250.

I see you too have been forced to give PMs estimates when you don't understand the problem.
That's what bothers me for years now in the context of contacts on smartphones. Maybe I'm making a mistake when thinking about it, but - if I refuse to share my contacts with let's say Instagram, but all of my friends share their contacts list which includes me, does it really matter if I decline to share or not?

Another part which bothers me is that I have lots of different personalities online. On most sites I use different usernames, and I wonder if there will someday be an AI which can match all the different online profile to a single person, even if different username are being used etc.
Wait isn't this exactly what the original commenter is concerned about? The charging infrastructure will lag the state of the art until Tesla's car business can catch up.

I guess that does assume nobody else builds better chargers in the meantime.
That would exactly negate the efficiency of the panel. You want the normal of the panel to be pointing at the sun which is generally towards the clouds emitting hail. Or are you suggesting an automated panel movement when hail is approaching?
Yeah, and I think it will be pretty simple to do. Just switch over to looking at what district the applicants graduated (or what neighborhood they grew up in) from and try to equally represent all school districts over time. For instance, if you have a poor high school that's never had anyone admitted to your university, then try to choose the next outstanding applicant coming out of that high school. That promotes diversity without involving race. Poor families can't easily change school districts just because they find themselves with a gifted child on their hands. I know because I've been there.
You could just copy this and paste it for any "no-code" solution. Beyond a certain degree of complexity and customizability, engineers are always required. You can't just create configurable automation for everything, because at some point the configuration becomes just as (or more) complex than the coding necessary to create the thing in the first place. Then you are just creating a new context for which a trained person needs to be hired with domain-specific knowledge, except in this case the domain is proprietary, which is actually what I think all of this no and low code automation is about.
Agree, I'm doing that to write about my indie hacking story, it's fun
Yes the are not familiar with material fatigue that has to be tested with a lot of repetition to understand how many operations you can perform with a unit.
Wait, are you me? I tried to convince musl to not break in this case (https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2022/12/04/1), but mostly got a "we're right, cloudflare's wrong" answer. Tweeted at Cloudflare about the issue (https://twitter.com/KennyMacDermid/status/160055878578481971...) and never heard back. I really don't care who's right, and can't change who's using Cloudflare+DNSSEC, so instead I just don't use musl.

[Previous comment](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35058094):
---

My personal 'musl broke it' story comes from resolving domains from Cloudflare that use DNSSEC in a K8 cluster. Basically this:

- K8 sets container to use `ndot:5`, causing the search list to be used
- Musl walks that search list looking for domain
- Cloudflare does not set the NXDOMAIN flag on a DNSSEC domain but does include an NSEC record (if you query with the dnssec flag).
- Musl takes this 'NOERROR' reply and returns an EAI_NODATA.

Is Cloudflare wrong? I don't know, maybe. They say some things about the standards[0] and that it's technically 'right'. I don't see why they couldn't change the behaviour for queries without the dnssec flag, but I digress.

The issue is that every other libc I tested will continue searching and actually resolve the domain. Musl is the odd one out, and _only_ in the case where the search list ends up with domain using Cloudflare and dnssec.

Even if Musl is 'right' here, when it disagrees with major implementations and a major DNS nameserver does it really matter?

[0]: https://blog.cloudflare.com/black-lies/
---
The analogy is just that: an analogy, and a very imperfect, misleading one. The working of the brain may have motivated early research, but GPT (as instantiated in hardware) does not operate or learn in a way similar to a human brain.
The M2 series does not support CXL, as far as I know.

They would presumably use UDIMMs anyway, so maybe there is theoretically space?

Still, that would be one heck of a socket/motherboard. I can't imagine how many motherboard layers and socket pins they would need for 16+ channel DDR5 in such a tiny space... If its even possible to manufacture, it would be hilariously expensive.
Not appreciably (the delta is less than 1%, see my response to OP in this thread), but since lowest gravitational acceleration happen to coincide roughly with areas of maximal rotational tangential velocity, that is, of the Earth's rotation about its axis, of roughly 1,000 mph, the optimal siting of rocket launch facilities tends to be near the Earth's equator, where gravitational acceleration itself tends to be lower, and near where the lowest measured accelerations are found.

Other factors would tend to dominate launch location choice, including particularly areas of open water east of the launch pad, useful both for deorbiting stages and in the event of any RUD[1] events in early-boost phase.

________________________________

Notes:

1. See <https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/10022/who-coined-t...>
It's fun to imagine the species in x-hundred years. My college physics professor once told us that in 500 years, physics professors will still teach Maxwell's equations in the format he was showing us. And honestly, I think he's right.

Somethings we will do the same way for hundreds of years, like the wheelbarrow will still exist in 500 years as it has for likely the previous 5,000.

Otoh, I doubt we will be going faster than light this millenium.
Where's your proof that gravity exists and that we fully understand all of its effects?

Science doesn't work that way. Meanwhile aspartame has been linked to many health problems.
I think public college admission should just be a random lottery.
I'm intrigued. That seems a fair bit different than the uncured bacon I'm familiar with in the US [0], but I would certainly give it a try.

[0]: https://applegate.com/products/natural-thick-cut-bacon
He’s 19 though? Pretty sure they wouldn’t have taken an actual kid. If you can join the army you can sure as hell go down in a sub to make daddy happy.
Donald Rumsfeld was famously influential in getting aspartame's approval ; however more of the story behind this can be found here: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/8846759/Nill,_As...

In 1984 the year after aspartame's approval for soft drinks, the company that held the exclusive patent on it, sold $600 million worth (1984 dollars) of it.

Myself the truly distasteful part is the use of neotame (a follow-on to aspartame) on animal feed, to get animals to eat feed that they normally would not; for instance, if the feed is rancid or otherwise in a condition/taste that normal animal instincts, would have the animal reject the food...
The UK government moves forward with a text and data mining exception (2022)