skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you want Debian, just use Debian. The idea behind CentOS and its successors is to have a free distro that is bug-for-bug compatible with RHEL, so that you can support users of your software who are on RHEL, or use software supported only on RHEL for free.
WebRTC: Legacy GetStats() Migration Guide
I don't see this one here yet: the two-handed, underhand free throw in basketball.

I'm happy to have a more knowledgeable person correct me (not having been a player, ever), but AFAIK this is a known-good technique. It's perfectly legal, but players feel it makes them look like a sissy.
Twitter is the dumbest site on the internet, and for some reason it has been given an air of legitimacy by all of those groups. I don't get it.
You seriously think the US can't get a few mercenaries inside Russia if they wanted to? Especially in this case... I am reasonably sure more or less neutral forces like the Middle East states or India would rather frown at disrupting TSMC and wouldn't be against a little underhanded action to take a few civilians out. It's not like you are doing a coup or such, you just need to accident a few civilians.
regardless of food context/state of matter, any chemical reaction occurring between food stuffs and it's voluminous container is leaching the plastic as the volume tries to reach chemical equilibrium. The air between the "dry" food and the container is just a bridge to the food-plastic at that point.

Of course you won't see that happen in real time in a way that's like "Ah, now it's unsafe." But rest assured knowing it's ALL unsafe, depending on how you feel about life.
And they don't have to serve you content.
Hah I've run into this exact issue. I've always been the same way, if a medium has unblockable/unremovable ads I'd tend not to consume it; things like radio, magazines, etc. But I realized when I wanted to buy something I didn't even know what brands were in the space. It made doing research a bit trickier.

That doesn't mean ads are necessary though, frankly any system which depends on spending more than your competitors will never produce the best recommendations. Instead I learned to first build a list of companies in a space, then research those companies. I use things like Wirecutter, Reddit, and Productchart to help decide as well.

What I need aren't ads; I need good, user-centric, recommendation and discovery products. Sadly we fell into the local-minimum of ads instead. That said sometimes I do choose to let a company advertise to me in a specific channel (separate email or social media account) so I can keep up with their products and potential deals. That seems like a good middle ground for me.
Financially advantageous students enjoy huge benefits. Enough so that they end up in a self-sustaining insular group of their own- an upper class if you will. Do you really want this?

I understand what you are saying about meritocracy, and for sure Marxists went too far: it's fascinating looking at the what the early Soviet Union attempted: watch the Asianometry episode where they tried to ban money: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWWqhsh848E

So I think the answer is of course a balance. College admissions should mostly be a straight meritocracy based on grades and high school achievement. But some help for disadvantaged classes, plus some random chance, plus some legacy for the money and contacts it brings.

Pure meritocracy has problems: an example of this is police departments. Do you really want an all-white police force patrolling all black neighborhoods, even if all of the white applicants have better scores than all of the black applicants?

Also you ignore discrimination. Decades of redlining and other similar policies have created many of today's problems.
None of these think tank types represent society.

Let society decide what they want to do with AI, not a bunch of compromised hype chasers.
Static-X might have done something like that intentionally, but it's generally what was done on CDs during the loudness war. It's why people were buying albums on vinyl instead of CDs, back before it became trendy.
Yeah, working just fine for me in Montana.
unless they're willing to ban entire households/CGNATs, there's really not much they can do about it

(short of requiring a login to watch videos)
Talking to people, and seeking things out myself when I perceive a need for something. If my shoes wear out then I'll decide for myself to seek out new shoes at a shoe store. If I don't know what brands are good, I ask other people what brand they use and if they're happy with it.

If I'm missing out on some product that I might like but I've never heard of because I block ads, that doesn't matter to me. If I don't know that I would want it, then I don't want for it. But generally, people talk about things worth talking about and I'd rather hear about new products from real people who don't have a commercial stake in promoting the thing.
Tell me where this shows up in the process of watching a YouTube video. On a fresh device I can navigate to their page, select a video, and watch it. Never in that chain of events is this agreed upon.
Why isn’t this on the front page? 100+ comments and it’s not there?
The premise of being a bad guy is that if you climb the ladder in the organized crime career path, you will be successful.

What a government must do, is to completely obliterate the reputation of anyone that could serve as an example of a successful organized crime guy. And instead, leave that person so humiliated so that no one wants to be that person.

Something such as "Hey little kid, is this loser your hero? Look what we are going to do to this clown", and then do a full Jackass style movie making fun of the guy, and make everyone believe that guy is the ultimate loser.

Also, send the message: if you steal $1, we will have no problem spending $1 million dollars chasing you down. There will be no tolerance for you.

Combine two things and what you have is: the defeat of learned helplessless, which is the true epidemic of Mexico. The feeling no one can do anything about it. In truth, you can. You can go where the bully is remind them that bullying you is not for free.

Arm every Mexican citizen with an AR-15 on their 15th birthday and then organized crime will be gone in 24 hours. Tell every citizen that if they seize money from organized crime they can keep it, and organized crime will disappear overnight. If you do that, the power will shift from incompetent politicians and organized crime, to the majority of people, who are decent, hardworking individuals that want peace. If you want peace, prepare for war.

If your neighbor is Clint Eastwood from Gran Torino you will not mess with that neighboor, and you will probably start using the words "please", "thank you" and "sir" more.
With my parents we rented a house once in Italy. There were two ponies in the garden, they just walked all over the house whenever they wanted to. There was one in the kitchen most of the time. In the early-mid 80's people just accepted whatever (as my parents did, after driving 4000Km there and back with my dad chain smoking in the car and us kids in the back not wearing seat belts). The whole experience involved breaking at least half a dozen laws & regulations.
It's wild to me that Pokémon GO is still so profitable. The way it penetrated the mainstream years ago was crazy to witness (people of all ages just walking around town playing it). Then it just sort of vanished from public daily life, but somehow it lives on much more discretely.
Partnering with Dust: LLM-powered productivity
I started blocking ads personally when I saw the double-click ads.

You guys will know what I'm talking about - random words in text, underlined twice, which if you hover over, will get an obnoxious ad.

Google bought them not long after:

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/14/technology/14DoubleClick....

Ads have been obnoxious for at least 15 years already.
A full chain is a difficult attack to create, and probably worth a lot more than $2.5 million - beyond the reach of one person. You need at least two novel, serious exploits. That's why they are so valuable.
So Reddit will of course do this in the following months. Monkey see, monkey do.
You almost certainly have more space in the detached house than in all but the most luxurious condo (albeit probably not as efficiently used). And there are probably other tradeoffs.

But I don't really disagree for a lot of situations, especially without kids. I've always tended to prefer moderately rural or urban and not so much in-between.
https://youtu.be/i8ju_10NkGY
> Your use of the Service is subject to these terms, the YouTube Community Guidelines and the Policy, Safety and Copyright Policies which may be updated from time to time (together, this "Agreement").

> Please read this Agreement carefully and make sure you understand it.

> If you do not understand the Agreement, or do not accept any part of it, then you may not use the Service.

Even if it's not binding, it illustrates what Google intends to do (stop providing the service via an anti-adblocker script) if you do not follow their TOS.
I suspect Symbolic AI might become a part of the larger LLM based AI. IMO symbolic AI is really a representation of 'hard truths' where there is no room for fuzziness like physical laws. But real world is fuzzy so the AI needs to develop a discretion on where to apply symbolic AI and how much.

one example may be an AI can look at the car video feed and use it to determine the speed of a car but to recognize the mile/road markers it may have to use the traditional CNN type modules, kinda like what we do.

Overall I feel this has a potential of ballooning into something really interesting like theoretical physics research could be largely automated using this type of combo (in somewhat not-too-distant future).
So now we have to embed encrypted traffic in innocuous plaintext envelopes?

It's like the cold war.
https://old.reddit.com/r/redhat/comments/14jq5i7/t/jpoeunh/

tl;dr: there are some contributions, mostly not to RHEL but to the surrounding ecosystem (including RHEL's upstream), so it apparently doesn't count.
I honestly don’t know what to say to this. If the meat of your argument is “they’ll never do the right thing, they’ll just keep stalling “, it kinda feels like you just don’t have faith in our government at all. In which case there’s nothing I can do to convince you otherwise.
Sorry to say, but it’s no different now than before in terms of skills and keeping up with “deep knowledge” to be successful in the way described above. Sure, things move quicker now… but pace of change was never the challenge for good vs. bad engineers. The good ones easily keep up now, and the bad ones still existed when pace of change was slower. In my experience it’s more about people’s willingness to invest in deep understanding. Bad engineers generally just don’t care to learn their stack deeply.
Some do for the SAT. Others work hard over years leading up to their SAT. Then there are others with financial reaources that can afford prep classes.
> So it seems that the anonymity of the older feed formats can be useful in some scenarios.

Huge understatement; it's more than just "some". None of the blogs in my feed reader are written by people that I have a public (reified) follower/followee connection with over social media. Nor do I have that kind of relationship with the authors of the books I check out from the library, for that matter.
It seems like a bizarre and self-destructive decision, if it is a decision rather than just a temporary glitch. If nobody can post external links to tweets readable by everyone, that destroys a lot of public interest in Twitter. No more news stories linking to tweets. Which may drive the already wary news media off Twitter entirely.

Twitter even advertises itself as a "news" app in the App Store.

The biggest surprise is, I can't believe that Musk would want to stop people from reading his own tweets!
... or related upstream.

not migrate2rocky, or almalinux-deploy. But if you look closely, they are mostly 'infrastructure' tooling to sync sources or deal with build nodes.
Correct mostly.

But keep in mind it would kill YT business model. Youtubers disabling ads means fewer ad views and clicks, so less profit for YT. Less reach also means advertisers agree to pay less, so even less profit. And finally there is no reason to sub to premium, so even less profit.

YT doesn't want to be just a free hosting because transcoding and serving petabytes is expensive I guess, and it does not want to be a paid hosting because it would make YT a commodity and no one wants to be a commodity.
Government policy, however well intentioned, created this system of incentives to encourage and boost college enrollment. Further exacerbating the problem are special intrest groups (lenders and schools) who salivated at the thought of a blank check from the feds.

I think it's silly to view this in a way that generates ill feelings for folks who pursued education. The blame falls on the government, lenders and schools. They should bear the cost of any forgiveness.
Remember, they're not regular people putting out messaging because they believe in something (or even lying because it's funny), they are part of a machine that is incentivized financially to put out messaging regardless of whether the people making it believe what they're saying. That's a different ball game, and tbh, it should be illegal or tightly controlled.
Does this mean that in addition of the classic fail2ban, geoip firewall, or forever super slow login banners, we could also have a honey pot sending a lot of data with a traffic pattern similar than web browsing ?
This seems great, and it's open source, too: https://github.com/yattee/yattee

And there's a native Mac app! And tvOS!

Maybe I'm just getting old, but as I was reading through the list of features this doesn't have, I just got more and more excited. My watch pattern is pretty much watching videos to solve problems or research some particular thing, and I feel like I find most of them through Google or YouTube search. The recommendations can be pretty good, but there's always those clickbaity, completely unrelated ones mixed in, trying to pull me into a totally separate rabbit hole.
If not consuming the content exactly as provided is "freeloading", then I guess I'm freeloading when I fast forward past ads on my DVR too.

Do you do that? I hope you're consistent with your principles and watch every ad.
I hate this word, but it seems to have caught on, so I don't feel like quibbling over the label we use to name the problem - it kind of distracts from the problem itself. Specifically, I gave up after I discovered this term was either coined or popularized by Cory Doctorow - if he's pushing it, I may just as well accept it.
Probably given a board seat, but usually the exact terms of a round are covered under NDA.
> If I walk into your restaurant and you refuse to serve me for lunch because I was gay. That is no ok. Me being gay has nothing to do with you serving me lunch. I don't care about your beliefs.

Why not? Cooking is as much of an art as baking a cake and ergo they should have the right to deny serving you food under their right to free expression.

This is literally the exact argument that has been used in both of these cases. Well, except in this case the site was literally made up and the supreme court fell for a fake case with zero standing.
I'm confused at this argument, you're saying that since it's easy to steal the content we should assume it's youtube's fault for trying to charge for it?

I imagine most things that people pay money for they'd prefer to get for free, but that's not an actual option on the table.

YouTube provides a service you can either pay for with money or attention, and sure if people don't think it's a worth while expenditure of either then by all means they shouldn't watch it.

Why are you assuming YouTube should provide their service for no compensation?
Did anyone else click this link hoping it was an article about Pete Weber’s incoherent yelling?
You don't think Americans losing their participation refusal veto on military action (if they won't do it, the government will hire foreigners for it - whatever "it" may be, foreign invasion or domestic suppression) is dangerous?

The only way I can make sense of your attitude is if you believe wanting to get US citizenship, and being willing to join a military (from their point of view a foreign military) is a sign of virtue, and only good people would do it.
I lived through that and had self-hosted video. It's both expensive and painful: YT just delivers video very well, with auto captioning, and comments. I remember when you'd view a random site and hope video would play. If it's YouTube I expect it to work. Huge UX improvement.
"I'm the video game boy! I'm the one who wins!"
So are most big-tech status pages, which is why they often fail to report the outage for a long time.
Lies, damn lies, and statistics…

> 4 in 5 tech execs are taking medications ("controlled substances"), and among that cohort 1 in 2 use them "every day or nearly every day."

Would it be surprising to anyone to find out that ~40% of tech leaders are neurodivergent? Programmer and related jobs are at the top of every list of suggested careers for people with ADHD.

> 1 in 3 used controlled substances such as amphetamines and sleeping pills specifically to cope with work stress and long hours.

What a poorly worded question. Why not ask specifically: do you abuse amphetamines to work longer hours? Do you abuse opiates, ketamine, cannabis, or benzos to “wind down?” Do you use benzos occasionally for work related panic attacks?

They’re being extremely weaselly by grouping all controlled substances together here. Would it concern anyone to find out that 33% of tech leaders smoke weed occasionally to relax?

And what’s the overlap between the 40% of daily users and this cope cohort? I suspect it’s vanishingly small, but they won’t provide that data, because they’re pushing an agenda here.

> 1 in 2 self-reported as qualifying as heavy drinkers (3-7 drinks per day)

There is a world of difference between the bottom and top end of that range. It’s the difference between an unhealthy habit and straight-up alcoholism. Conflating the two further reveals the overwhelming bias of this article.
The first season of The Naked Director (Netflix) gives a good glimpse of 1980s Bubble-era Tokyo with some great location and set design. The second season is set in the 1990s, and I've not yet watched it.
This is very cool indeed. I might learn golang just for this.
It's sad to see this sort of thing on HN. A web browser is a user agent that operates on behalf of the user. Let's say it again for emphasis: the web browser serves the user, not the site owner. The user is free to manipulate the received web page however they see fit. If the site operator wants to get paid, they can put the service behind a login paywall, or else they can go pound sand. There has never, ever been an obligation for users to respect the wishes of site owners; once it is off your server and on my machine, it is my data to do with as I see fit, including blocking whatever ads the data happens to contain.
So what? That has nothing to do with my comment.

There are feed formats named "RSS". There is a feed format named "Atom". And there is a concept named "RSS". The RSS formats, like the Atom format, are all implementations of the RSS concept. Generally, when you subscribe to an RSS feed somewhere, it will be in the Atom format. It's still called an "RSS feed" for the simple reason that that is the name of the concept.

> it's sometimes used as the name of the functionality but it's improper.

No it isn't. What would you gain by insisting that RSS feeds delivered via Atom have to be called something different than RSS feeds delivered in legacy formats? Did we rename TLS when we updated the cipher suites?

Why, in your opinion, is rssboard.org even bothering to write about Atom?
> Regardless of the outcome of 2024, that's going to his most lasting impact on the country.

No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capito... This is will be his most lasting impact on the country or maybe https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/donald-trump-says-hes-...
Because you could have waited on paying off your loans, and under Biden's plan you would have got $20K handed to you. In that case, the decision to pay off your loans would have carried an opportunity cost of $20K to you.

"I hope others get forgiveness." Loan forgiveness does not mean the debt magically disappears; it means somebody else is paying it. That "somebody else" is a taxpayer, who might be a plumber or Walmart clerk who never went to college. "Their gain" really is somebody else's loss, who likely makes less money than the beneficiary of loan forgiveness.
It's not your fault, blame those early homo sapiens and their agricultural revolution.
I am interested in seeing if this decision has any side-effects in regards to the future of the economy.

I know myself and others who are still saddled with student loans are going to be spending less on consumer goods due to this decision.

I doubt this decision would ever cause any kind of major effects on the economy in isolation, but one can only load so much straw on the metaphorical camel's back before the camel's back breaks.
I’m not taking out a loan, I’m sending money. Everything they offer is irrelevant to me.
That isn't the loop. A lot of predictions about computers have turned out wrong.

The biggest one in my lifetime was the belief that social media would bring the world together, create world peace, and spread economic prosperity.

Usually the technologies that surprise us were predicted by nobody. They just show up.

Go watch "2001: A Space Odyssey". Then go watch some music videos from 2001. You will get a better idea about how accurate these predictions are.