skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
After my two Pebbles, I have never found something quite like it. I have then accumulated a drawer full of sad, obsolete and nonfunctional smart watches.

I then moved my interest to good old plain watches. Digital, mechanical, self-winding, manual-winding, hacking seconds, chronographs, divers, all that. It's a rich, complex, and beautiful world.

They can get as expensive or as affordable as you want, but for the price of one expensive smart watch you can get quite a nice collection of watches that you can combine with different styles of life and fashion.
Ironic since the reason sticky exists was because developers were sick of managing it in JS. If you truly believe doing it in JS is better, feel free to do it in JS. No one is stopping you.
Pretty cool; didn't know that.
Exactly my thought. But, then I’m a 50+ year old white guy, so unqualified to speak.

In my personal experience w/ carbon fiber overwound tanks for compressed natural gas — my very first thought when I first heard they used a carbon fiber “pressure vessel” was:

“Wow, ballsy; carbon fiber composite is great in tension, worthless in compression”.
We do and if you do not want to bother self-hosting, our free-tier is sufficient for around 200 answers (1000 executions): https://www.windmill.dev/pricing
Like watching Wilbur land the Flyer I and wondering if that was peak aviation.
Really loved the recent LLM integration with langchain support. First in the ecommerce world.
Apple went out of their way to add the ability to boot third party operating systems to M-series macs, which the Asahi Linux team has been using to build a Linux distro tailored to M-series Macs.

Asahi Linux is still a work in progress but shockingly usable for its age, and will no doubt be ready to roll by the time the first M-series macs have their support dropped. I’ve read that OpenBSD is bootable on M-series macs too, so that may also be an option.

Additionally, while I don’t think Microsoft will ever take the invitation, Apple has publicly stated they’d welcome an Apple Silicon port of Windows.
>It means taking active steps in making the victims feel welcome and safe in the place they were in.

That's already presuming they're right though.

>The rate of false accusations is extremely low.

And that's the case because we don't instantly believe the accusor.

I say this mainly because if we assume that there are many bad actors out there we must also assume that there are people out there who aim to gain attention or hurt someone through a false accusation. It undermines legitimate cases but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. And it likely happens more often on the internet now because of it has cultured an attention seeking environment.
Fatal police shooting of teenager triggers protests and arrests across France
do you have some resources regarding the use of awk with find ?
I don't think this was meant as true, hence the quotes. But I can imagine that quite some retail/non-expert customers could use this kind of reasoning to estimate odds and risks.
More like in spite of Embarcadero...

There's still Lazarus[1], and Common Lisp got CLOG [2] which is very much like Delphi except in the web and in Lisp

[1] https://www.lazarus-ide.org/
[2] https://github.com/rabbibotton/clog
France knows how to protest power abuses.
There is also improving support with tools like cython.
Can someone help me a little? I tried Kagi and when my 100 searches ran out I stopped using it. I really didn't like the feeling that I needed to meter my searches, it added a barrier to every search I did (should I use Kagi for this or should I just use Google?). It sounds stupid but literally every search I did I had a pang of worry that I was "wasting" a search.

I also didn't experience a huge increase in search quality that I noticed. I didn't really get into the Lenses stuff even though it seemed cool because I just don't think about things like that when I'm searching. I guess 25 years of googling has conditioned my way of thinking about search.

Kagi feels like something I should really like and I'd be fine with paying for it but I guess I need some more "tips" about how to get the most out of it and/or how to change my way of thinking about this.
I recommend using DrRacket for the first two weeks.
And use it when you are working with picts.

Note that you can change the default settings to be more Emacs-like.
Regarding offline payments perhaps what they mean here is that you as the wallet holder don't need network connectivity but the merchant does?
You don’t get to make information publicly available. But not publicly available. If you want your blog to be restricted, put it behind a login
There's also the SOC 2 requirement and SSO makes that a lot easier.
Hyped tech that lets someone feel like they're improving their product is a hell of a drug.
The supermassive black holes merging in the video sound like a human talking about astronomy, and various snippets of corporate stock music. One brief recognizable bit of cello (Bach?), but the holes making the cello sound are not identified
Also if your host and client devices both support mDNS / Bonjour, you don’t even need to type the IP address.

For example if your Ubuntu Linux desktop machine has host name foobar, and you run a http server on for example port 8000 then you can use your iPhone and other mDNS / Bonjour capable things to open

http://foobar.local:8000/

And likewise say you have a macOS laptop with hostname “amogus” and for example http server is listening on port 8081, you can navigate on other mDNS / Bonjour capable devices and machines to

http://amogus.local:8081/
gnuplot is an alternative that is available on almost as many systems as awk, and can do the job as well

edit: this prompted me to write up a little note showing how: https://notes.billmill.org/visualization/graphs/gnuplot/A_ba...
The term of art of this is "identity assurance."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_assurance

https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/
Don’t Let AI Steal Your Company’s Data
Search on Google Calendar
The truck that the parent poster refers to is not a 16-wheeler or panel truck used for commercial purposes, but someone's impeccably clean F-150 that hasn't hauled anything in 2+ years
Yes I do. I own the work I create, even if it's publicly available. I do get to decide what happens with it.
From a bird's eye view we would like to give the database hints on how to package tuples into pages. That's easier if the rows can not grow arbitrarily in width.

In practice that means (and I think, MySQL did that) that arbitrary length strings or other data (Character Large Objects or Binary Large Objects) are packaged into different pages and require another seek operation, while strings/bytearrays with a maximum length can be packaged with the rest of the row.

Of course, when the SQL standard was conceived, databases were much dumber than they are now and hardware was quite different. Your implementation may vary.
Is classic search relevant? Within a year, I expect Google to replace search with an LLM that delivers answers and references to the source material vs making users click through.

ChatGPT is the opposite of teenage sex: everybody is doing it, but nobody is admitting to it.
> Seems like if it's legal for a person to do it should be legal for software to do for the most part.

If you're going to make a claim this strong, you should expand on it. Should software be able to have custody of children? Should it be able to kill in self-defense? Should it be able to make 14th amendment claims? Exactly what part of the case (other than the damage claim) is hard to understand?
Simple internetology also dictates that when a site starts making the user experience miserable, users will accrete elsewhere. Discord is actively eating away at Reddit's userbase, to the point where community subreddits tend to be on-ramps to the "real" community located in a Discord, and in my perception the blackout seems to have accelerated this trend.
maybe if the we re-write the submarine in rust it wont implode?
Is that "just" a performance concern though? Ie why is there a base58 and base62 but no base63?

Now you've got me curious on the performance of base58 to base64 hah. Down the rabbit hole i go. Appreciate your reply, thanks :)
Single thread performance did not change much last 15 years.
A look at some EU Acts that will change software engineering forever
Believe it or not, it's proportional to the fourth power (!) of the axle load: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law
Throughout my career I've only grown a monotonically increasing level of appreciation and support for backwards compatibility. It seems to be an ever-increasing problem, because as we solve a lot of the other problems around using libraries, this one gets bigger and bigger.

However, I don't know how things are actually supposed to advance in such an environment. At the programming language level, my answer is, develop new languages. Existing languages should not klunk along and keep adding feature after feature trying to chase the state of the world 20-30 years after they were initially designed. But even if you accept that statement from me, which I know many of you won't and I'm OK with that, that's still not a very big help anyhow. I don't have a language I'm maintaining, and neither do most of you. I have some apps and libraries. What am I supposed to do with them as deficiencies in their underlying foundation are revealed?

To which I simply don't have an answer. My little team has two UIs we've inherited, both in super deprecated languages or UI frameworks that we can barely work on anymore, but we can't afford to be rewriting them every four years. A nontrivial part of the reason they're still staring at us is that we're reluctant to put a lot of time into upgrading them, only to discover 2-4 years later that we upgraded one obsolete stack we can't actually change anymore into another obsolete stack we can't change without a rewrite.

The only thing I can say is that I can see the programming world coming to a greater understanding every year that every dependency is a bigger long-term cost than meets the eye, and all I can say is thumbs up to that and it's something we need to continue to appreciate collectively. It isn't a solution, but at least it leads to actions that are little improvements, and lots of little improvements are still better than nothing.
One explanation is that the typical JS output by the TS compiler is more verbose (so more code to load, parse, and run). On the other hand, one can imagine that the TS compiler’s catching classes of errors at compile time means fewer runtime exceptions.

I think the takeaway, however is the theme of a spectrum of energy efficiency, with compiled languages being more efficient than those that are not.

But I still maintain that the overall efficiency of a system is more a function of other factors.
CT scans of video game controllers: inside the PS5, Xbox, and SNES gamepads
After writing what I wrote, I've been thinking some more and I would have said

Life on the road is camping
Tent, Hotel, Van, RV
Doesn't matter
It's always camping

Ice management is always a consideration.

Anyway, a tent large enough to stand up in will still roll up small enough to fit in the trunk. With a folding chair and folding table, it's an office.

But a folding a chair and a shade tree in is an office too if you learn to work with the laptop in your lap.

37.815104, -96.851884 is a place I once worked one morning in early June, 2017.
> Olivia would streamline, coordinate and simplify the approval process for housing so we can get more built, faster

Those are generic sentences without substance. Of course the city wants to be efficient. But unless I hear specifics I'm extremely skeptical.

> She made it so that you can now build four story, four unit multiplexes

Good, but city approval for heights is probably the most boring and lowest hanging of my complaints. Zoning reform and NIMBYism is 90% of what reduces supply and kills off meaningful development.

This is a multi-decade crisis, it's not a minor policy debate in city council.

Even if they can get approval for a 4 story multiplex the fact 90% are building skyscrapers instead of other (legal) arrangements happen because it's the only one people are willing to risk $$$ on. It's extremely risky to run a development project in the city, because a) where you can build is severely capped so you have to build as high as possible and b) if you're going to navigate all of roadblocks and NIMBY backed lawyering you better be getting a property who's ROI can fund teams of lawyers and support years of development, often well before any construction start.

If we actually want to solve the housing crisis we literally need to start razing whole blocks of single family homes, industrial areas, old office buildings, etc and build high density housing.

This is radical stuff. Nothing about what Chow is proposing is anywhere close to addressing the crisis.
Love Vaporwave. Still think it was one of the most beautiful random genres to ever come out. I listen to mallsoft, specifically cat corps palm mall mars regularly. What I find even more interesting is I occasionally try to the original source tracks for the samples, and I just find vw version more interesting to me, despite being of the age to appreciate the source material.
The author of this article has provided several uncensored models, mostly Wizard and Vicuna. He's actually gotten hate mail/threats as a result.

https://huggingface.co/ehartford
Reddit Is Already on the Rebound
The order of magnitude of suggested pricing is really interesting: $0.001/word is significantly more expensive than, say, OpenAI's pricing of GPT-3.5-turbo ($0.002/1k tokens, ~750 words, so ~$0.000003/word, assuming I got my zeros correct). So this would increase the cost of running GPT-3 by about 300x.

In terms of implementation, I wonder about a few things:

Do models trained on more data have to pay more? LLaMA was trained on 1.5T tokens, the original GPT-3 was trained on ~300B tokens. And this is only partially related to model quality, LLaMA 13B and LLaMA 65B were trained on the same data, but the 65B model is better. What's the incentive to ever use the 13B model, if the licensing cost is 100x-1000x the model inference cost?

Who defines a word? Each model uses a different tokenizer. I'm personally amused by the idea of a government-mandated tokenizer.

What about generations that never see human eyes? As an NLP researcher, I've generated millions of tokens for training and automatic evaluation purposes -- are those subject to licensing as well?
The Common (un)Wealth is on a death spiral. CANZUK, muahs.
Reactive Programming Made Easy
If we dissect this case, it seems to revolve around two central questions: what constitutes 'public' data and to what extent can AI models leverage such data without infringing upon individual privacy. This lawsuit may well set a significant precedent in defining the boundaries of AI ethics and data privacy.
Show HN: We made Forever ID – an internet identity that you own forever
New CRISPR-like system in animals that can edit the human genome
Rich people tend to be old, and not all, but many old people have bad hardware, even if they are rich. Meanwhile, 87% of US teenagers have iPhones.
Or maybe when you started posting on reddit, LLMs hadn't been invented yet. This is true for 99.9% of the people who post on Reddit.
Women Interviewing for Bill Gates’s Office Asked Sexually Explicit Questions
> How can they make it work offline while protecting the money from being duplicated?

It's not actually possible to prevent this entirely. It's not even possible with physical currency. You can always look at a bank note and make an exact-enough duplicate, then spend it twice.

> they're planning to make it so that you have to go online every set period of time and then they verify the money.

That's not a hard requirement, but yes. The central bank is the final authority on what currency is counterfeit or not.

-----

For current technology, I think it's probably sufficient to have a smart card issued by the central bank, with an embedded certificate chained to the central bank. For offline transactions, the two cards can establish an encrypted stream, mutually verify that they were attested by the central bank, and then mark notes as transferred to the other party in TXN#X, run the transfer, then delete the notes entirely.

Interrupting the process might leave the notes in a partial state (marked for transfer to a particular smart card), but the connection can be reestablished to try again, so long as the TXN# isn't incremented by another transaction.

Now you have to hack a smart card processor to double spend (and only offline, and still detectable), which is of similar difficulty and risk to making counterfeit banknotes.

Maybe North Korea will sell you an infinite money card, but it will only get you free coffee when hiking in the Alps, and only until that card's certificate is added to the revocation list and people update their transfer boxes.
One other advantage is that Perl will be found in the base install of almost any unix-like system. Python, nodejs, even bash may not.
Mostly agree with the author but hadn't thought terribly deeply about it in the past.

The N/`CHAR` data type has served as somewhat of a code smell. I use the following approach when deciding (against) selecting fixed-width char types:

((1)) Is it ALWAYS a single character? Yes: use N/CHAR(1) No ... ((2)) Is it ALWAYS fixed width? No, use VARCHAR. ((3)) Is there a more appropriate type to use for the fixed-width data.

The third item tends to be the killer of CHAR(x>1). Too often the underlying data was converted to a fixed width string and stored that way when it should have been stored using a different type. I've seen everything from GUIDs-as-text which could be UNIQUEIDENTIFIERs to CSS hex codes that could be stored as integer values.*
The new desktop Outlook is a bad idea
Perfectionistic parental attitudes are indirectly linked to compulsive gaming
Mile-long RV Encampment in SF Bay Area [video]
How Real-Time Is Amazon Cloudwatch Logs Live Tail?
> But if it does, I hope it leads to some clear laws regarding data privacy and how TOS is binding.

One of the "I wonder where this will go" things with the reddit and twitter exoduses to activity pub based systems is that it is trivial for something to federate with it and slurp data without any TOS interposed.

The TOSes for these systems are typically based based on what can be pushed to them - not what can be read (possibly multiple federations downstream).
> Seems like if it's legal for a person to do it should be legal for software to do for the most part.

It's legal for me to look out of the window and watch my neighbor go to the supermarket.

It's _not_ legal for me to build an automated surveillance system that tracks everybody on the street 24×7 and stores everything into a large database.
"There was an error generating the chord progression." Every time I click "Generate"

Looks like a 403 - Site disabled on the call

OPTIONS https://chord-alt-api.azurewebsites.net/api/reharmonize?progression=[G, Em, C, D]
This is a similar idea to how I understand the Elephant Carpaccio exercise by Henrik Kniberg & Alistair Cockburn (2013), from what I've been able to Google. The key idea is that work should be broken down into "vertical slices" where vertical means that the entire user story is captured, or as it's described at https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5e3bed81529ab12a517031ab/5ec..., "very thin slices, each one still elephant-shaped." The first vertical slice might be a mockup or very-low-fidelity prototype of the complete project and subsequent slices are enhancements following user stories. Horizontal slices might be, say, system components or other subtasks that leave you without something prototype-looking until all of the slices are complete. At least, this is how I've interpreted what I've read about it.
Moto 360 Sport had this kind of display (transflective LCD) and I kept it working with battery replacements for years. Finally moved on to a GW4C and I miss the display all the time, it was perfect to glance at either day or night
I really enjoyed Kagi but it wasn't worth paying $25/mo for unlimited, and like you I don't want to be thinking about metering my searches.
NUL bytes are perfectly acceptable in the middle of a Unicode string, in almost any Unicode encoding.
Perfect, thanks for the clarification on all these points.

I think my original point still stands: newspapers are sensationalizing something they don't need to be. I think this is a good decision by the court, to prevent creating unwanted caselaw; it sounds like Musician's lawyers had a pretty big swing/miss.
It isn't hard for me to believe that he really wants to make our species multiplanetary since I strongly identify with that goal.
> Its not hard to define success.

Everyone has their own definition of success. For many, a "successful" tech startup is one that eventually lands a $100M+ buyout, or gets millions of paying customers, or some other metric that's far beyond "simply" arriving at a sustainable business that you (and I) mentioned.
You might be interested in the Prusti project, which statically checks for absence of reachable panics, overflows etc. It also allows user-defined specifications such as pre and post-conditions, loop body invariants, termination checking and so on.

https://github.com/viperproject/prusti-dev
This keeps happening, and I wonder if it's worth scripting something that helps with the year annotation... ?
> Would it be better to ignore the problem?

Would it be better to focus on the larger problem, rather than distract with a symbolic but ultimately meaningless and punitive "solution"? Yes, it would be better to ignore it for now and focus on adjusting the gas tax to properly reflect how fuel efficiency increases allow for less and less gas to be bought for heavier and heavier weight. To skip over everything noted in the OP comment that hasn't been done to have ICE drivers "pay their fair share" only to then to focus on the tiny minority of EV drivers rings pretty hollow.

>if your car has less weight you use less gas and therefore have a “tax break” compared to the guy on the 5,000lb truck.

What if you have an older and less fuel efficient car? Why should new car buyers get a tax break vs older car owners when it is vehicle weight that is doing the road damage? Would it be better to ignore the problem?