skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I added that because the first two responses seemed to be confused.

Anyway, uncommon household uses can also be a safety concern. People still do occasionally get poisoned by mixing ammonia and bleach even despite the repeated warnings.

Talking about the constituent parts is similarly relevant when you’re heating something to significant temperatures. Many reasonably safe substances really shouldn’t be tossed on a bond fire etc. For other things it’s not the substance itself that’s a concern but impurities from the manufacturing process. People often think of past recalls as companies doing something dumb, but I think we underestimate how difficult it is to get this stuff right.
I was hoping to see if that titanium flange was still bolted to the cap, but it's obscured by the tarp in the photo.
Big congratulations! I'm an extremely happy user and can't even think about ever going back to Google. The results I get from Kagi are much higher quality (even though they use Google and Bing under the hood iirc) and I hope they will be able to rely much more on their own crawler in the future.

For anyone who hasn't tried it: give it a try. For me, not having so much Blogspam and content farms in the results is just amazing.

No affiliation, just a happy customer.
Fair enough :)

Absolute statements are generally bad ideas, and I've just been reminded of why that is the case haha.
Yeah, I worked with one of those "we get paid if you get paid" firms. Professional, courteous, & every conversation we had was completely to the point. First call was with a receptionist. Spent maybe ~30 minutes talking to the lawyer total. They already optimize not to waste time.
Secret movement bringing Europe’s wildlife back from the brink
For those in NYC - The Met has an exhibit on now of Van Goghs Cypresses paintings[0]

I highly recommend going if you are in NYC.

This exhibit includes Starry Night (which is on loan from the MOMA, also in NY) along with many others. For any moderate to major fan of Van Gogh it will not disappoint.

[0]https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/van-gogh-cypresses
I would argue that dimensionful quantities are never used as arguments to power series, however you are correct that this does not imply that angles are dimensionless, since (like we do with other quantities, we can divide by whatever unit we like to get something dimensionless). I withdraw that argument.

A better argument that angles are dimensionless is that dimensionless quantities are formed by the ratio of two quantities with the same dimension, and the angle subtended by an arc in a circle is given by the ratio of the arc length and the radius.
Don't forget the veterans who've asked for ramps.

"Canada Veteran Affair's department: Finishing what the enemy started!"
But note how right above this span there is the <span class="katex-mathml">, which is not aria-hidden, and which contains the MathML representation of the equations. I would have assumed that a screen reader would look at that, since it contains the semantical information.
As someone who hasn't struggled with weight I don't understand this sentiment. I'd love to eat way more than I already do and I'm constantly hungry.

Sure it's hard but if I ate till I couldn't regularly I'd end up several thousand calories over what my body needs for maintenance.
Nothing in that catalogue provides evidence of the government having exotic technology, the fundamental principles of which were completely unknown to the public. Governments can commission custom software and microchips and keep the details of those secret, but those things still operate on principles already known to the public; electronics, exploiting software, etc.

When has this ever not been the case? Maybe gunpowder in the middle ages, when it was best understood by secretive alchemists and utter magic to everybody else. But in the modern scientific era, what are some examples? Even wacky shit like cavity magnetrons don't fit the bill; the basic premise of EM radiation and even radar was already public knowledge by the time these technologies became militarily relevant. The devil was in the details but the broad strokes of the thing weren't utterly exotic.

Even in the case of nuclear weapons, the broad foundation of theory was already public years before they were brought into existence. A great many details were kept secret, but the broad strokes of the thing wasn't secret. When Werner Heisenberg and his colleagues, now in Allied captivity, first heard of the atomic bombings of Japan their first reaction was disbelief.. because they thought such bombs weren't practical to build. But they knew most of the theoretical basis for such bombs already and once they became convinced the bombs were real they had a pretty good idea of how they must have worked.

But then you have alleged antigrav. There's no theoretical basis for such a technology known to the public right now. Nobody can say "well it could be done with XYZ but it would be very tricky to design and expensive to build.."
> That does sound a little high. But it seems you have more recent info than I do

This is the solo special contractor rate. You aren't paying a person a million bucks. You're paying a "company" that because that's what expertise in how carbon fibers set in a particular resin matrix subjected to a high-frequency supersonic detonation ring or something, an expertise that globally numbers maybe five, and within the U.S., three, is worth.
There's always fasting, calisthenics, and avoiding PUFAs.
Here's where the kool-aid starts to kick in:

The fact is that, contrary to what the Estonian parliamentarian said, Brazil and other countries of the so-called Global South do not have to choose between any of the sides defined in this new diplomatic Manichaeism.

But of course they do just that anyway.

After both talking and triangulating out of its ass -- it's quite clear which side the PT is really on, as the sibling also points out.
Sources that identify persons who worked at government intelligence agencies that now work in private sector, that are verified? That's quite credible, as it can be quickly and independently verified. Brains... use them.
> I'd assume he does a fair bit of reading

Eat any good books lately?
> there is nothing that disrupts an individual worker's productivity as a child.

I have two kids and it isn't that bad at all. Very small loss of productivity for me except when I took parental leave for 3 months. I have grandparents that live nearby and they can help with sickness and other babysitting though.
The requirement comes from the clients, not the lawyers. No sane person would ever opt in to having to account for every six-minute increment of their work day.
The extra 240lbs of gas at the start probably hurt fuel economy.
There are a ton of good Marvel movies. It’s suffered from the fate all franchises do where they run out of ideas and the original writers are replaced by hacks, so it goes to shit. Guardians of the Galaxy 3 was good, but it will probably be the exception.
You're probably right, although I'm not sure it's quite because of a lack of familiarity with strictness; I think I just prefer it distributed very differently. I think there's value in there being a spectrum of what's acceptable across different circumstances, but tying openness to an "optional" form of recreation seems very unfortunate.
That it is a nearly sorted sequence. Typically the first part of the ID is a timestamp. So you may sort the IDs down to the second it was created. But for IDs created at the same time the order is random. This can be used for caching, database performance and so on.
Most interesting is how sponges were needed to stabilize the fuel.
That is encouraging. At a quick glance, the offline activation stuff looks reasonably clean too.
DuskOS – 32-bit OS Written in Fourth
So the general consensus from the comments appears to be that there are far more people wanting these jobs than there are jobs available. So the solution should be to discourage people from entering this profession. It's supply and demand. And currently, that balances toward the studios. Weed out the excess supply and the studios will need to pay more to the remaining workers. As for the people that can't imagine doing something else? Welcome to the real world where lots and lots of people do lots and lots of jobs they don't love. At a certain point, you have to give up on the dream job to pay the bills.
> Somehow it was decided to launch on an underdeveloped platform which strew debris and dust

unless something comes out in discovery, they didn't know it was going to do that. and they had a reasonable basis for that belief, in the form of the static fire tests.

there are no whistleblowers popping up. i haven't even seen any youtubers popping up with "i told you so!" claims based on all of the footage that was available of the launch site beforehand.

> considering what we've known since the Saturn V.

the saturn V launch facility is an absolutely massive pile of earthworks; it's perfectly reasonable to try and engineer something smaller than that when you want to build a couple dozen of them.
Delta Parallel Reality Experience – Dynamic Multi-Perceptural Display
> Maybe governments around the world have always known about objects flying/floating around.

David Grusch talks about this in one of his interviews: https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/ufo/we-are-not-alone-the...
4,061.8 km with 0 L fuel, 12 years ago (2011).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokai_Challenger

The best ICE still isn't cool because it's fundamentally Earth's chain-smoker with terminal lung cancer failing to light a cigarette while almost blowing up their oxygen tank.
Well yeah, so what? America already doesn't care a lot which cultures the immigrants are from. They just try to make it work, uphold the Constitution, and don't overly pander to anyone.
I really thought this was a reference to the dropbox showhn - "you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224
which is almost true by a 3 month tolerance each
I would expect thawing a tab to present me with the tab as it was last time I saw it, no reload; whereas, being a link, I'd expect a bookmark to load the current version.

... Actually the latter is incorrect, in truth I'd expect bookmarks to present me with the exact version I had in front of me back when I bookmarked it, including if the site is temporarily down, has vanished, or if I navigated a more recent version.
Sad truth about "democracy" - people keep thinking that the other party will fix their problems but it's always more of the same. Rinse and repeat.
What ever China has, is because it stole it from US public/private companies. So if China is trolling us, its with our own tech. This puts US in a equally worse spot. Share that you have secret high tech items, at the expense of admitting CCP agents also brought it back home...
Most of the open source Ai things are Meta. React, GraphQL, pytorch, rocksdb, docusaurus, prophet, a whole ton of internal tools that aren’t public knowledge. Full disclosure I haven’t worked there since 2019 though, so not sure since then.
Because one of the purposes of flying surveillance aircraft in US airspace is psychological warfare. It sends the message that China/Russia/whoever can send whatever they want into US airspace and there's nothing that anyone, including the military, can do about it. It sows fear, uncertainty and doubt in both the public and even members of the military who can recognize the advanced capabilities of the armies they might have to fight. It sends the message that you are not safe at home, and those who are supposed to protect you can't.

However, if people think they're aliens, that instead turns psychological warfare on its head and into something that inspires awe, wonder and possibility. No one is scared in the ways adversaries want them to be scared, and no one doubts the government is actually capable of handling threats from adversaries.

"Aliens" as an explanation quells the potential for panic, versus adversaries successfully inducing the panic responses they desire. It also gives the opportunity for those who care too much about this to be painted as quacks.
No, I simply believe that you attempting to exert control over the birth rates of people you don't know is an ethical no go, regardless whatever "scientific" basis you think you have.

> The arguments of neomalthusians are not correct, because birth rates plateau in response to lots of external forces

And attempting to engineer those things to an end of changing birth rates is starkly dangerous territory, nor will a pattern always hold. Not all cultures have less kids upon becoming more educated.

> What would you say of native peoples whose land is being made unlivable by the climate crisis and loss of biodiversity?

There was a young woman attempting to collect signatures to "stop burning the rainforest".

I asked her if she understood that those burns came from people who lived there, often the poor, who were attempting to farm.

She doubled down that it was wrong. So I asked what she would have them do instead. Would she be willing to give them different land? A different place to live?

It's easy to make "other" people sacrifice at no cost to yourself. When you have to directly compensate them, suddenly people change their tune.

"Collective good", "save the children" and so on are red herrings. Of course we want the commons to be well treated and the children safe, but how often is that action actually achieving that? How much more often is it merely control by a minority?
This is actually a problem in the games industry, where git is generally impractical for assets and things like Perforce or even SVN are used instead. It’s often preferable to put the code in the same place too, which interacts poorly with disciplines that have good reason to use git instead.
So, is it a net benefit or not?
> You can't discuss math while getting rid of the math symbols. That's not a reasonable proposal.

If we assert that some topic can’t be discussed with plain prose, then the only logical conclusion is that you can’t discuss the topic at all.

> Math on the web is broken, the the affected people should be up complaining about that.

There is really two different topic there.

One is, how can screen readers deal appropriately with symbolic notations — be it astrological esoteric formula or mathematical abstruse formula.

An other one is how you chose to express ideas. Using symbols only is always possible, whatever the topic. Using prose only is always possible. Using multiple representations is also always possible, including audio record, alphabetical text, ideograms, pictures, video.

Note that I didn’t blame the author for any fault here. I just pointed out that, if one take as a goal to be the most accessible as possible to general public, using academic symbols is not the way to go. It doesn’t mean that people with some matching academic curricula might not prefer to have a document full of esoteric symbols, be it for real actual communication advantages or mere bigotry and vulgar elitism.

We all know here, I guess, that anything written with this kind of symbols can be just as well and without any ambiguity transcribed into a programming language which use exclusively mundane words or turned into a series of two signs that no one can grasp instantly.

That conversation make me think about comments in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36433212
EDIT: This is what I'm talking about. Not a productive conversation. You've convinced yourself that every failed game dev deserved failure, and all you have to do to prove it to yourself is make a half-assed complaint about every game you see.

Send me an e-mail and I'll just message you every game I come across that should have been a hit and wasn't, once you get tired of it you can block me
That museum is great. Spending a day there gave me a deep appreciation for Van Gogh, maybe even art in general. Pictures online definitely don't do it justice. The museum also has a good guided audio tour that narrates Van Gogh's life story as you go through the collection.

The mesmerizing colors and poignant landscapes, the neurotic physicality of the brush strokes, all told through Van Gogh's letters to his brother -- it was a vivid experience. I understood that Van Gogh saw the world in a different way, and for a moment I saw it too.
Ingenuity is also running a very customized software stack to go along with the highly tested hardware. IIRC the OS can reboot in a some relatively small number milliseconds. It's meant to be able to crash in mid-air and reboot and recover before the probe loses lift and crashes in most flight envelopes. The software is also set up to crash and reboot rather than try to recover or operate in a compromised state.
> Nothing in that catalogue provides evidence of the government having exotic technology

It doesn't have to, it was a counter-example to that "decades behind the private sector on computing technology" thesis.
What a strange non sequitur. Are you OK?
A lot of DTC lab testing is actually cheaper than rolling the dice with your insurance company
making a living off indie gamedev is not realistic because of how easy it is to do the same as software engineer.

so why not both? a few years on, a few years off, repeat. remote work makes this even easier.

i’m just starting gamedev, and am building just to see if i can.

i like the game i’m playing, but i feel like it could be better. i’m impressed with what’s possible, but wonder if current technical limitations are surpassable. i accept that industry sees odd things as cost centers, but how would things change if they didn’t?

individuals will make the next breakthroughs in every field. software is unique in how powerful an individual can be.

gamedev is probably the hardest thing there is. it combines everything. your bank account will grow smaller, but you will grow bigger.

failure isn’t just an option. failure is the plan. what an amazing opportunity. what a time to be curious and to wonder.

last nights vid:

https://r2.nathants.workers.dev/jetpack_mantling.mp4
The latest standard for v7 does not meaningfully describe how to interpret the last segment.

It says they could be pseudorandom and non-monotonic. Or it could be monotonic and non-random. These are completely disjoint cases! "X or not X" is tautological. And there is no way to determine which (e.g. there could be a flag that indicates this mode, but there is not).

To be clear, the standard should be amended to resolve this ambiguity. Say the last bits MAY be monotonic or MAY be pseudorandom. Or add a flag that indicates which.

As there is currently no standard way to interpret these bits, I feel perfectly justified in using the a few of the least significant ones to encode additional information.
According to the article it was a three driver team that was swapping out regularly. Also, the bike was made full size by wrapping the thing in a huge fuel tank. Still, that's a long ride even on a full size bike.
Proper version control would ruin all the fun - it would make it easier for unwanted parties (such as e.g. the partner you have office rivalry with, or legal discovery process you're at the receiving end of) to step through the history of your documents, while making it harder for the opposition or other third parties to ship all the juicy history to you by pure accident (i.e. sending the OG Word document with "Track Changes" still on).

(Disclaimer: IANAL, most of my "knowledge" about the legal profession comes from the TV show Suits.)
Absolutely, e.. an offset of +2:00 in e.g. 2023‐06‐28T18:00+02:00 could mean Berlin in the summer (Central European Summer Time, clocks will change) or in Johannesburg (South African Standard Time, not summer and clocks don't change). Same offset, different time zone, different clock change rules.

As you note, for some uses this _does_ make a difference and tracking which one you have can in these cases be important.
> write the workflow in their DSL spec

With Github Actions (for example), the workflow in their DSL "spec" is in our source control as .yml files, though.

> you can run your own native code as workflows

Github Actions lets you specify `docker run`, so we could execute "(y)our own native code."

> decoupled from your source code

Given the above, could you elaborate on this?
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Male and Female Genitals During Coitus
There is not a single invention out in the world today that came from alien technology, that came out of left field, or has no paper trail of terrestrial origin. Holography for example has been a hot topic since the 1600s, combine holography with the invention of photography and you get holograms.
Road and bridge repair backlogs are being reduced from increased funding in the previous infrastructure act. This may only impact interstates and maybe state roads. I'm not sure if county and local stuff is part of that.
All good points..

One more from me:

- Payment/order processing systems typically involve complex logic.

- One of the best ways we managed to keep complexity in check was to model these as state machines (with the state itself being persisted to DB)
Well how about the fourth option: nobody ever does anything bad?

Seems about as realistic and well-grounded as your proposal.
This is MAY be true consumer applications and even then not all.

But it is rarely true for enterprise customers.
They want the guarantees their data never leaves certain regions even in a request along with other security and compliance guarantees.
I grew up (and still live in) the House Street Disposal Site that has very high PFAS contamination from 3M/Wolverine leather treatment.

There's a whole saga of testing involved:

https://www.michigan.gov/pfasresponse/investigations/sites-a...

https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/safety-injury-prev/environmen...

I ended up receiving a few complete blood surveys in the process - comprehensive metabolic panel, hematocrit, cholesterol, testosterone, albumin, bilirubin, thyroid markers, and at least a dozen other medical terms that I don't fully understand, plus what's apparently a more comprehensive PFOA/PFOS study than this one, with dozens of varieties of PFOS/PFOA.

I had a total of 9.8 ug/L in my blood, after drinking water that was 78ppt PFOS for decades.

According to your link, there were tests done by the state in the past, were you unable to participate in those studies?
Sometimes PIP=Personnel Intoxication Plan as well, when employers want to force employees toward increasing productivity by taking a dive to draw a diagnose and recipes for attention disorder stimulants.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/us/workers-seeking-produc...
> Are you saying politicians don't like pageantry?

No, I am saying that their indulging in it, regardless of whether it is feeding into something popular in some segment is not, simply because of that popularity, beyond reproach.

> Or are you saying that specifically Rubio is more about pragmatism and uniquely not part of the Kabuki theater?

Oh, hell, no!
It's also interesting to look at this in the context of the "State of Open Data" report [1].

[1] https://digitalscience.figshare.com/articles/report/The_Stat...
> Very expensive and difficult to produce __is__ exotic technology.

Not in the sense of antigravity. Enough money and time can buy you an arbitrarily nice mirror, it doesn't rely on presently unknown to the public attributes of the universe.