skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, it's also cryptocurrency and NFT's
/s
Printing money is by definition out of nowhere.

If governments sell bonds to domestic buyers then indeed that doesn't create money, but in practice most bonds are bought by the central bank using printed money.
> It's also still used in most every prop engine that flies over my house everyday at a normal schedule, so we still haven't solved the problem of leaded gas. We never will (in my lifetime).

Do you know why? I was under the impression that avgas (aka leaded gas for airplanes) was being forced out (albeit slowly) by EPA
I love how, in ML land papers, GPU is a synonym for "Nvidia GPU." Other vendors basically don't exist.
I remember.

It was the worst. Crawling a ring all day to find useful content was incredibly inconvenient.
> and it's not entirely like using >>=

Exactly, and that's why it is not pf. It's really as simple as that.

It's also not as if it would be theoretical distinction that has no meaning for praxis. It does. For instance, since I cannot control the execution of React's cycle (including rendering) it becomes hard(er) to do certain kind of page animations that should happen between renders.

> It's very different from jQuery and the callback hell

Yes, it is nicer to use. But it is not pfp-style.
A New Map of the Universe, Painted with Cosmic Neutrinos
GitLab team member here.

The training data is documented in https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/repository/code_sugg...

AI Transparency is important, all available AI features provide documentation for training data, and are built with privacy first.

The GitLab Duo announcement adds more feature details and plans. https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2023/06/22/meet-gitlab-duo-the...

The AI/ML blog series provides insights on experiments, and features being built. https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2023/04/24/ai-ml-in-devsecops-...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contributory_infringement

The Copyright Act does not expressly impose liability for contributory infringement. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the "absence of such express language in the copyright statute does not preclude the imposition of liability for copyright infringements on certain parties who have not themselves engaged in the infringing activity.

One who knowingly induces, causes or materially contributes to copyright infringement, by another but who has not committed or participated in the infringing acts themselves, may be held liable as a contributory infringer if they had knowledge, or reason to know, of the infringement. See, e.g., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005); Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984).

IANAL. Considering Valve not only gives games a retail platform, has to approve games before sale, and takes a cut of that sale and assuming the reddit post isn't a lie then I am gonna guess Valve's probably well staffed legal dept decided not to take a seemingly iffy legal gamble on a game that probably wasn't going to rake in a ton of sales anyway.
>> because lots of people just read headlines and maybe they can do that without clicking.

I agree; I'd argue you don't have much of a valuable service if all users need is a headline. Print media needs to give up the traditional shallow breadth fueled by advertising and go niche, and go deep. Cable TV should learn this lesson as well.
I suggest watching this doc on a sub build for "challenger deep".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pb5j9oeZCm0

The hull was pressure tested in Russia. The amount of engineering was just immense compared to Titan.
"Journalists" are like vultures now, they just run towards anything to publish as much as possible with absolutely zero regard for any journalistic ethic.

Might as well just replace journalists by AI at this point, to a large group of people (me included) they've all made themselves more hated and untrustworthy than a company, economist, politician or civil servant.
Choosing Hotels over Airbnb as a Woman Touring Musician
Yep:
>Sometimes I'll check into a rental in the middle of the night, and it's a cute little house but there's no toilet paper, or you can tell that someone was underpaid to clean it badly.
The obvious problem to this armchair expert "solution" is that Google doesn't know what I am already paying. I pay NYT for a subscription, but Google doesn't know that. For obvious privacy reasons users don't want to tell Google what sites they already have subscriptions with. And I don't even log in to Google to do a search so there's no place to store that information even if I actively wanted to provide that to Google.
Agree, (these are not the droids you are looking for). Look to Google, Meta, and the telecoms as they are the most eggregious and abuse their market position blatantly.
That's basically the issue. And Google because Google News.
This comment really embodies what the whole "I got PTSD from my startup" is really about. It's not really about the truth, it's that people want to say it's so hard they ended up with a life changing mental condition that requires years of mental health care. The fact you even think it's some how bad to gatekeep a medical condition to those with the medical condition really shows you're really detached from reality.

Seriously, this is the problem with today's world. We have a bunch of people who struggle so much they need to pretend they have medical conditions they don't to make themselves feel better. Are you going to pretend you got MS or ALS next? Or just stick with mental conditions in the hope that people don't understand how much nonsense you're spouting?

The fact you can't understand if you're going to have a blog post about psychology and mental health, starting it off with stuff that is complete nonsense about mental health really shows they don't know what they're talking about. But instead of realising this was a nonsensical blog post by someone who couldn't grasp the bare basics of mental health. You're too busy trying to claim that startups are soo hard you get PTSD from it. It's so traumatic the stress you endured you were terrifed. Aww poor you. In otherwords, you're a wimp. You went through some stress and it broke you. Something that didn't threaten your safety terrifed you so badly that you're broken. Except, it's all nonsense. You're just holding on to this PTSD as a way of saying you were very stressed because you literally don't know what you're talking about.
You mentioned computer graphics and C language, so game development strikes me as a reasonable guess.
Find a company that does both, and that will hire you for your experience in one. Maybe that's a Python company that needs to do Rust stuff, or occasionally has performance constraints that mean they need to use C?
Being good at something does not make you a monopoly. They are not actively blocking other online retail platforms. This is not a statement to defend Amazon but the fact that I prefer Amazon for its features (like same day delivery) is just plain capitalism. The customers have a choice to buy from a retailer they prefer and the important thing is that I still have an option to choose where I make my purchases.
>While Canada's bill may not be well-tuned, it is a welcome first attempt.

The problem is media companies have been pushing this exact blueprint for d years. decades. It is a terrible, terrible template.

If countries want to tax big tech and give the money to media organizations, they should be honest about it. Laws like this distort reality.

>the current balance between news organizations and internet brokers isn't up to the task.

This doesn't make sense. Newspapers want links to their stories. I've even seen media organization paying "internet brokers" to advertise stories.

The law has the economics of the internet backwards. To receive a link is to benefit, everyone knows this except the government.
That's pretty cool, didn't know they were planning that.
The OP of the thread you are replying in claimed “so obviously monopolistic”…
Sure, but that doesn't relate in any way to the legal problem that this post is about.
Yeah, I suspect it works out closer to the "350 more calories per day in 20% of the population" number, but again, sources were rough.
Nice reference site. Not to nitpick but it would be cool if search parsed the Description and Usage field as well, for those times where you remember what a command does but not what it is.
Guessing UT Austin?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Geodetic_System
I'm not so sure about that, pics of the wreckage being offloaded onshore show that dome being moved with a sling through the hole where the porthole should be. I don't think they would have removed that just to move it, especially before analyzing the debris.
My Private Pilot training was almost 30 years ago, but after a while it stops being exciting. And that was a big part of why I dropped out: it had become about as interesting as driving in rush hour traffic.

Like the situation OP says: you scan instruments to analyze the situation, determine what to do to recover and apply that procedure. If it doesn't work, or something else goes wrong during that procedure, you adapt to another procedure. Remember, that during every flight with an instructor, you're being trained on one thing or another, so after a while all the "emergencies" seem routine. You'll be turning onto Final to land and suddenly your instructor will decide that your flaps failed so you have to land without them, or just as you're flaring for a landing he'll tell you to go around, etc.

It certainly results in well-trained pilots, but it also gets very boring.
Now that I'm weaning myself off of reddit, my favorite "toilet reading" is news.google.com

But since I'm in Canada, I suppose I'll go back to RSS or maybe AP news.
I travel 300+ days a year for work.
I book my own place to stay using my company credit card.

Never really tested the upper bound of what I’m allowed to pay per night, but I do live comfortably. The megacorp I work for has a booking system we’re supposed to use, but I’ve never used it. I figured if I bend the rules to everyone’s advantage, no one will complain.

Generally I use booking.com(for those sweet sweet miles & more points) or call the establishment directly to get the best possible price.
> I am not a free market zealot, but you cannot compare the final price to the one in Germany.

Well, I don't disagree with this. You were the one claiming that electricity is cheaper in Germany, and trying to find a way to compare the two. Germany's prices are taxed for future investments, while France's prices are calculed to amortize past investments. That's a significant accounting difference.

However, when you measure electricity costs, you have to understand which production systems create it. France's current power (and therefore prices) comes from nuclear system built in the 70's to 90's, which happened to be extremely cheap and reliable, and that is why we have cheap energy 40 years later.

I can't claim that the next generation of nuclear plants (or anything else, it's not obvious that France will have nuclear plants in 30 years at the current pace) will be as cheap, so we may have to pay more in the future.

> Whatever it is, it costs EDF money, and therefore it needs to be a part of the price.

I have no doubt these investments will be amortized in the next 10 years, and factored in French power bills.

> The electricity market there contains hundreds of companies that all need to be profitable, or at least not lose money, or they will simply be removed from the market.

No offense, but as a French person interested in the electricity industry, the German model isn't a great example. With the money poured in the Energiewende (and, I mean, good for them, they have enough money to waste it), the results are almost criminal. France doesn't have that money, so we can't afford quixotic, inefficient policies.

> Here is an article from 2012, where it was already back then clear change is needed

My guess is that after Hollande's election, no one wanted to build new nuclear (which they probably should have considering France's low interest rates) but no one had a good plan for an alternative energy source. Honestly, there's nothing good to say about France's electricity policy between 2007 and 2020.

> Scholz or Merkel or whoever doesn't go around making plans on how they will build nuclear plants, which Macron does all the time.

Well, yes. That's Macron. Be happy you only hear about his international policy lies.
> it's important to note that the EFF is very pro-big tech and is largely funded by them.

I find that a puzzling comment. EFF has a strange way of showing its allegiance to "Big Tech".

What do I not know? How does the EFF demonstrate its allegiance to them?

I took the EFF's work on privacy as an impediment to "Big Tech"'s business model. How am I wrong?
Not to argue in favour of the bill, but I think the idea is Google's whole business model relies on others for content, so a slice of that revenue should go to the content creators (even though the content creators gain from Google, and can generate their own ad revenues).

The Liberal party is also trying to protect Canadian content (again, not to defend or advocate for this policy), and I'm sure this is part of it, even though it may ironically backfire and end up hurting Canadian news outlets.
Please read the original paper and base your comments on the repo that the authors provided.

Like you, most readers haven't seen the paper.

Like you, most readers have only seen "Table 4. Normalized global results for Energy, Time, and Memory" taken out-of-context (often without any way to find the original source).

Most readers notice the too-large differences C/C++ and JS/TS and start speculating about how those differences were caused (because that's fun).

I went back to the time measurements the authors provided and calculated the Mean, Geometric Mean and Median. Simply using a more appropriate summary statistic would have presented average values which readers would have found acceptable:

JS 7.25 times slower than C
TS 7.8 times slower than C

:even though they were based on different programs and included an outlier. (Similar story with C/C++.)
I think what it's saying is that you can't use licensed Qt to create software that uses both it and OSS Qt, not that you can't use software that uses OSS Qt to create software that uses licensed Qt.
Congrats to newly forged MSc Kokkonen!
You generally can't force someone to do business with another company. You can tax a company and give that company to another organization. But you can't force google to run google news in a given jurisdiction.
Yeah thatay work on desktop, but not on server where you probably want to use Leap.
Then the non-pros never have the opportunity to learn from the pros and the pros never get a break which leads to employee morale and retention issues + tacit knowledge loss.

Pros get burnt out being constantly called on to crank out new features under pressure and never get to leverage their deep understanding in the maintenance phase.

Non-pros have no upward mobility (career progression) and get burnt out struggling to understand and maintain unfamiliar code without any guidance.
This antitrust action isn't about their retail sector though... I can only assume the many people acting without that understanding here didn't read the article.
The article does not mention that there are no stable isotopes of astatine, including the new discovery.

"Astatine is a fast-decaying, and therefore rare element. It has been estimated that in the Earth's crust there is no more than one tablespoon of astatine."

From the wiki:

"All of astatine's isotopes are short-lived; the most stable is astatine-210, with a half-life of 8.1 hours."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astatine
Outreach programs can't be part of the solution? Why not? The suggestion was based on studies that found a high amount of distrust of the medical system.
That would be violating the proprietary licence terms
Woah, thats a pretty cool feature! I allways feel a bit dirty trying to do anything like that manually (usually involving a string.split(",")[0][:2] etc, just asking to break).
I’m no mental health professional, but that sounds like literal PTSD, to me.
> If two people are in parallel, they will make two parallel circles. If two people aimed at a singe point, they are not in parallel.

In spherical geometry, the equivalent of a straight line is a great circle. There are no parallel great circles. That's why I used the phrase "initially parallel" -- at the starting point, both people's paths are at a 90-degree angle to the great circle connecting their locations.

I didn't want to get into "locally flat" vs. "globally curved" in something that started as an ELI5 thread.
I started my first industry job in 2015 well after this and I was still wined and dined the night before the interview. The cocktails were $12, I had three, my future manager assured me that there was nothing to worry about the next day. In my last job, there was still lunch at a "$$$$" restaurant (at least according to google reviews) after the on-site interview.

I once got flown out to Shanghai from NYC, all expenses paid for 3 nights to interview for the China operations of an European tech company.

I guess everything is now different with remote work but before the pandemic companies, especially your prospective manager, would go out of their way to make you feel good if they really wanted you. Those were the places you wanted to work, even if the salary was higher somewhere else, because you knew you would be privileged and respected before even stepping in the door. That meant getting more resources, having more leeway and freedom to do what you want.

I also get the feeling hackers and "creative programmers" are not as valued as much in today's market. Managers want "I" shaped as opposed to "T" shaped hires.
The problem with data is that they can often reveal information you need, but didn't even know you need.

The way I understand Tesla's meaning of "data they need" is the data that you know exists, know is useful, and has a predefined purpose. However, blind data mining can often bring insight that may give you an edge over competition, so the unethical data collectors have an advantage.

On the other hand, collecting all available data makes you biased by the particular nature of data collected - not everthing that is measurable is important, and not everything that's important is measurable. Even 100% accurate data can lead you astray if it gives you an incomplete picture. That's how we got algorithms that optimize outrage, because outrage and stress create massive engagement.
My point was that common-sense women, in situations where there was no Evil Employer, still tried to arrange things so that they gave birth during the months when they had the least other work to do.
The Supreme Court’s blow to US affirmative action is no coincidence
>It's the best and most used cross-platform GUI framework that has ever existed.

Just because it's the best on that has ever existed, doesn't make it good. It's just the least bad.

>Nobody has ever been able to make this work outside of the web browser.

Sure would be nice if everyone would give up then and we could go back to having nice, native apps using native controls, file operations, encoding, hardware access, performance, UI/UX patterns, and security features, instead of letting all that rot on the vine while we reinvent the wheel on the browser.
The obvious way to beat that game is to stop carrying Brazilian news before the legislation is passed.
List of the Oldest Newspapers
I agree with your sentiment but this is a poor way to dismiss an argument.
You don't see any possibility that the 90/10 split is in some part due to each genders' preferences, in general? You don't think that, in general, women prefer more social careers and less staring at a screen for 8 hours?

For example, men are well established to be physically stronger in general, so fields requiring heavy manual labor like parts of construction requiring a certain level of strength, will naturally favor men. All else equal, this pulls men from other fields so that the other fields would be like 52/48 women/men. Of course things aren't equal and we see an amalgamation of different factors, some preferential, some physical, some discriminatory, leading to imbalanced outcomes. But remove the discriminatory and that doesn't mean you get 50/50.

If not, then by a purely discriminatory worldview, men are severely discriminated against in higher education by their low college attendance rates.
Media in Canada is in pretty dire straits right now. It looks like one of the last left-ish leaning papers (Toronto Star) is about to be gobbled up by post media. A huge swath of broadcast news media is owned by just one company, Bell which predictably leads to stories like "Top Bell Media executive urged CTV to avoid ‘negative spin’ on coverage of parent company". Plus the current batch of conservative leaders (PP, Danielle Smith, Ford..) all have an axe to grind with what they portray as leftist and woke media. Particularly the CBC, they'd love to see that dismantled. Then there's all the wonderful personalities involved like Conrad Black.
It's a fine analogy, but the map is not the territory. Machine learning is not human learning, even if it works in a vaguely comparable way.

It's still a computer program that uses an enormous amount of copyrighted work as its input.
I got an email about this from my university president expressing his disappointment with the ruling. He assured everyone the campus will continue to strive for more racial diversity and that this ruling is a hindrance to that goal because race based discrimination is a good thing for achieving diversity.

The school is already about 25% white in a country that is ~60% white. Is that sufficiently diverse? What is the optimal amount of diversity and why? There are a lot of questions I could ask. But I think it's interesting that schools have announced so strong a commitment to diversity without really explaining what diversity is or how having certain racial demographics results in the best possible outcome. How would you prove that?

I don't think this ruling will have any effect. The schools are pretty clearly committed to diversity, whatever that means and for whatever their reasons may be.
To be clear, I don't like them from the perspective of equity crowdfunding, which has an alarmingly high percentage of low-information, follow-the-crowd, "dumb money" retail investors.

SAFEs muddy the waters. It's just another thing that already overwhelmed retail investors need to take into account when considering whether to invest.

https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/safe-securities
Far from it, the point is that the lived experience of the individual matters, just not their race explicitly.

The court recognizes the effects of race and recognizes them as valuable when considering a candidate, just not their race per se. If you allow me to be a bit cheeky, it values the content of their character over the color of their skin.
YouTube tests disabling videos for people using ad blockers
There was that guy who used to demonstrate glass windows as unbreakable by running into it. Until the window popped out of the frame.
I mean if you ask the tool to produce a specific algorithm by it's very famous name then that's on you. If you ask DALL-E to draw Pikachu you can't be suprised Pikachu when it's a copyright violation.