skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
See also: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1125304/why-prefer-twos-...
The amazing part is they only have four comments to begin with, and nothing personal in them.

Also Nocturium a ban won't affect your old comments.
Sorry I forgot the URL:

https://gmi.skyjake.fi/lagrange/
Examples of what ? Also, what exactly do you mean by "outside of the Unix and C family" ?

(note: if you want examples of compilers that have `#pragma once` then I don't know what to say because I'd be hard-pressed to name a compiler that does not support it - similar situation w.r.t. header-guard detection)
People have this misconception that unsafe Rust is some other language. It's not. All it does is allow the use of raw pointers. So, all other Rust feature (ie type system) still work as they always did. So, you can really minimia the surface are of unsafe code. Not to mention seeing unsafe just means that something really low level is happening, and signals caution to the reader (or anyone editing the code), as opose to C++ where it's easy to forget you need to be alert, since you should be alert all the time really.
I always considered the stories about sea monsters to be greatly exaggerated.
I have two potential reasons for this:

* Asymmetry of information. The insurance company has all the data on the statistics, costs etc.

* Insurance companies very happily take your money, but when it's their turn to do the thing you literally paid them for, they look for every possible reason to weasel out.
Nobody would do that when logging a ticket because it shows internal company disagreement which often doesn't show the company in a great light. Nobody does that.

What typically happens in this situation is the chap logging the ticket gets pissed off and says to the boss, "ticket logged it's with $vendor, I guess it doesn't need babysitting so I'm working on other tickets now".

The boss in this case is happy as it shows their earlier investment was a fine idea. The employee though is disgruntled as their toys were taken away and things it's not such a fine place to work.
Indeed the gaussian curvature in a torus is 0.
It wildly depends on the model of camera. Never had an issue with my RLC-823A cameras. I've heard many horror stories about their earlier models.
True, as long static analysers aren't part of the build, at which time specific constructs can be made to break the CI/CD build, forcing everyone to play by the rules if they want the PR to go through.

It isn't perfect, but does improve a lot the security baseline.
I know the Russian army (including Wagner) is bogged down in Ukraine and losses were high but what are the chances of a mercenary based coup?

If Putin gets desperate wouldn't he just start using heavy weapons? Doesn't Russia have a history of disregarding their own populations lives?

So what is this guy doing rising up?
I think I had one crash with Firefox on Linux during the past 6 years and that was a weird edge case where I tried to do something during an update process.
> "unsafe" just means "safe but the compiler cannot verify it".

"unsafe" means "safe"?

I would say "unsafe" means "only safe if used in a manner that cannot be checked by the compiler".
All true; I have also recently discovered that meetings at the start of the day are not a solution to this problem, because if the meeting is intense (in good or bad, but the effect is more pronounced if the meeting went bad) then you can spend the rest of the day thinking about it.

The only solution I can think of about the meeting problem is to have them all in the same day. A day with even just one meeting is ruined, however you organize it. Let's have them all the same day.
I will never agree to a take home assignment unless the company agrees to a debrief.

A (reputable) company asked for a take home assignment after a "group interview" as a college hire, and as a college hire I didn't know to tell them to pound sand.

Same experience as yours, I spent twice as long as I was told it would take, then was rejected with feedback that was generic and very subjective.

Admittedly my career went in a different direction (company was realtime ads, I went down the distributed systems rabbit hole) but I still disagree with their feedback. Given the chance to do the assignment again (assuming, for the sake of argument, that I wouldn't laugh in their face) I would come up with a very different solution, but still one that I think would yield similar wishy-washy but negative feedback.

Moral of this story is to never accept take home assignments, and don't get discouraged if you get poor feedback from one because it's essentially a distilled version of everything shitty about onboarding & code reviews, rolled up into a single package
America lost like 4k soldiers over the 8 year war and lost no economic standing. It was expensive and stupid but not really a disaster for us.

Russia has lost over 100k in a year and effectively destroyed their economy and place in the world outside of nukes, all for basically no reason.
I don't believe code _is_ the documentation.

I've thought of information systems for code, I once used OpenGrok to parse a large codebase and try work out how it works. But it's undirected learning.

I think question answering would be useful:

"Where should I change the code to insert behaviour that changes X, Y, Z behaviours"
Thus not adequate for performance requirements.
A note is a set of field. A card is a specific way those fields can be displayed to the user.

If you want to learn the elements for example, instead of having multiple notes of the form "element name->symbol", "element name->atomic number" and so on, you can have a note that includes the fields "element name", "symbol", "atomic number" and so on.

The cards then specify which possible combinations to show.
> Whatever the situation, whatever the company, you should show up with your very best. Not for them, but for you.

i cannot stress this enough. Case in point: after having been a moderately successful I.T. Guy my whole life, i was knocked out of the industry by a severe case of chronic RSI and found myself, a couple of years ago, delivering newspapers between one and three in the morning, six days a week, to earn some extra money. i found myself thinking, "you know, this may be minimum-wage menial labor, but if i don't give it my best effort then i'm just being an arrogant (expletive)."

To be clear, i had to keep _actively reminding myself_ of that (because it _was_ brain-dead, low-paying work, which can easily become demoralizing for someone used to earning well by typing), but if someone's paying me to do a job, and i've accepted the terms of that job, then it's up to me to make an honest best effort.
What we need is larger orcas, and more of them, and also air-orcas.
Agree. IMHO, the problem can be solved with enhanced bandwidth(that is, to use things beyond text, IRL we have mimics and voice tone so emojis are a start) of the communication.
Super fascinating.

I wanna share my experience and get some feedback into how you approached this. I want to make clear, that I approached this by consciously ignoring how real life works, where adhering to the rule and the instructions made it necessary:

> You might know of some rule in your jurisdiction which overrides local rules, and allows certain classes of vehicles. Please disregard these rules; the park isn't necessarily in your jurisdiction. Or perhaps your religion allows certain rules to be overridden. Again, please answer the question of whether the rule is violated (not whether the violation should be allowed).

This boiled down to answering technically "What's considered a vehicle?" and "What would be considered in the park?".

To answer this I googled when I was not reasonably sure.

I did not go to much length to answer the later question, but basically, if there were a rule that declared x meters above the ground is no longer considered to be part of whatever the area on the ground is defined as, this would what I would be interested in for this purpose. Of course, there is a lot of countries in the world, so there's probably more than one answer to this.

We have a little bit of an issue around the "disregard your jurisdiction" part in the intro (but I guess that's also part of the dilemma): All these things are defined by some jurisdiction (not necessarily in the judicial sense). We need to apply from somewhere. I don't see a way how to solve this without implicit bias. Both options satisfy the rule as stated without further constraints.

If you disagree with any of this on principle I would be super interested to hear you talk me through issues with my thinking or just explain where you went differently and why.
That guy is simply plain mad with crazy ego
Bolwoningen: Living in spherical homes
> In fact, today it's almost a recommended practice for large web applications and it's called "tree shaking". ECMAScript modules are inlined into the same scope. It makes the JIT work easier because it now works with symbols instead of `require(foo).bar` calls to speculate on. It makes most web apps run better, both in bandwidth and compute.

That's bundling, not tree shaking. Tree shaking is an optional additional process during bundling where unreachable code is automatically removed.
It kind of did if I recall correctly, but in the most infuriating way possible: signed overflow is still undefined!
Thanks, I should check it out.

How do they explain Germany though?
One way to take things out is to have something like Sonar on the CI/CD pipeline, configured exactly to take specific patterns out, that break the PR builds and won't get greelighted for merging.

Yeah, not everyone likes those of us that share development roles alongside security best practices enforcement.
So it’s gone from burning non-renewable sources like gas and oil to burning… iron.

This feels like a poor stop-gap that will turn into a long term solution one day instead of focussing on nuclear fusion/fission, solar, wind, beaming energy from space, etc.

I had to lookup a German word for this: Weltschmerz.

> Weltschmerz literally means 'world pain' and refers to a sense of world-weariness.
> What's the difference between using a pencil to write something and using an LLM to write something?

The pencil is not a derivative work of a pile of copyrighted material.

> Why does one produce something copyrighted why the other doesn't?

There's existing case law that non-human entities (e.g. animals) can't create copyrightable works. And in the case of an AI LLM, the AI LLM itself is a derivative work of its training data (as evidenced by the fact that it can by default spit out training data verbatim, even if it has had after-the-fact filters added to prevent such responses).
Since the decimal number system is "the" system of all number systems (as we are pestered with it from an early age before our brains have developed suitable abstraction capability until it just becomes second nature) it can be advantageous to think through how ten's complement representation works in the decimal number system.
Rostov and Voronej now both occupied by Wagner.
> that's the problem

No, that's not the problem. That's human nature, and human nature is most definitely not the problem. Humans make the world we live in and we individually get to influence it, but we don't get a veto on how others influence it.

To me, the quiz answers depended on common sense, and I was reminded by it that my common sense is not others' common sense, and so what? That's life. We deal, because there's no other choice when we live in society.
The two traffic signs recognised under international convention are "No vehicles" and "No motor vehicles".

The first excludes pedal cycles.
Are you planning on documenting your API? contributing a mobile client would become a lot easier

tbh after trying SwiftUI the last few weeks I am tempted to give it a shot myself but being really unfamiliar with this type of web development trying to figure out the API routes seems a bit daunting
The majority of comments and people participating in a forum generally both have common sense and are good actors. It's the borderline cases that are difficult, and of course there are boundary pushers of all sorts persuasions. Some are right, some are bad actors.
Using Google Maps causes Firefox (114.0.2) and the whole OS to completely freeze within minutes on my Laptop. This started happening after I upgraded to Fedora 38. Not sure if this is caused by the same bug. Could be Gnome, Wayland, who knows. Has anyone had a similar experience?
> All these things are defined by some jurisdiction

this is what i would call culture, or social norm.

And the thing is, this social norm might be different betwen different people and thus, either cause conflicts in interpretation, or actual real life conflicts.
I can relate to this. I had fond memory of SuperMemo on DOS and wrote a little terminal tool “lrn” inspired by it: https://github.com/krychu/lrn

I acknowledge it’s simple, runs on terminal only and lacks bells and whistles. But this is also probably why I use it so much.
If the cybersecurity guidelines keep being improved upon, I expect security assements to be a requirement for 3rd party libraries, regardless of the language, just like we already have to do legal checks before being allowed to add them into the internal package server.
The author completely intended for this level of discussion by asking for you to dogmatically follow the rule and posing a lot of circumstances where most people would allow it to be broken. It appears to be working as intended.

I'm pretty surprised that you thought it was so black-and-white to allow things like emergency vehicles - a lot of places ban emergency vehicles (and they follow that rule) because they are too dangerous for those vehicles to enter. Personally, I assumed that might be the case given that the sign said no vehicles at all.

Also, the Monty Hall problem is not ambiguous at all. The clear answer is to switch doors thanks to how conditional probability works. The paradox is why people stick to their chosen door, and it is a weird psychology problem, but they are objectively wrong.
If you've been following the war this was expected and not surprising.
One way to look at it is that the highest bit is negative instead of positive. So in an unsigned 8-bit integer, the highest bit is worth 128. In a signed integer, it's worth -128.
> but if you want the highest paid employee per team or department

That's straightforward, no?

max(salary) over(partition by emp, dept order by salary desc) as top_emp
...
where top_emp = 1

(You need to put the window in a subquery)
No, police and ambulances are vehicles. They're not allowed in the park. It's a violation. Maybe they can get away with the violation but if you're following the rules it's a violation.

This is why the real rules say "Emergency vehicles allowed", and then usually "No skateboarding, roller blading, scooters".
Completely disagree. I've observed other people run whiteboarding session with candidates and "solving them" usually means, "in the way I want" and if you've only just met then thats only going to happen through hints.

The "context" (hints) they give different candidates can vary massively, perhaps by the end you've realised that your question is ambiguous, or you like the personality of this other candidate.

I've worked with folks who will definitely give attractive women more guidance throughout so they arrive at the "correct" solution and not see what they are doing.
Both "No vehicles" and "in the park" already require you to have external knowledge. What is a vehicle? What constitutes park grounds?
> Suppose you have the bit pattern 0xFE and you add 0x1 to it, producing 0xFF. If you interpret that operation as signed math it's computing 254 + 1 = 255, while if you interpret it as unsigned math it was -2 + 1 = -1.

Isn't that backwards? The first one is unsigned, the second one is signed.
Sounds like the railway staff are indeed enforcing the spirit of the law by allowing mobility scooters on the platform. If I had to guess why your tricycle was not allowed it's because the staff perceive your tricycle as a potentially very fast moving obstacle on the platform which the mobility scooter obviously is not. They are probably more concerned about the safety of others than yourself when they apply that rule. In my opinion analysing the intent of rule is the right way to go about enforcement even if it means different people will arrive at different conclusions.
Nice.

Maybe you should fix the palette and not have cyan and teal in the same set (for balance you could shift teal in the direction of blue and further).

The principle is similar to that of defining a palette for readability of graphs (we also had interesting submissions on HN on the topic).
Oh, that's very interesting about the functional dependencies. I'd certainly no idea about that. Interesting discussion, thanks!
>Or reimplementing higher-level job control on top of channels every single time.

Can you please explain this?
No, replace "sued" with "humiliated". Every time. It just sounds more prudent to say "legal risk" than "we're worried a member of staff will make us look like absolute morons" or "we're lazy". It's obvious when you think about it.

"We didnt hire her because she seemed like she might get pregnant" isnt the kind of feedback most people write anyway and if they did a 2 minute pass via HR is enough to eliminate the risk.

The companies that are actually worried take pains to tell you what not to say during the interview. This is rarer than you'd think. Most companies aren't actually that worried about getting sued over interviews. That doesnt stop them from tossing this lame excuse at you though.
Wagner chief vows to topple Russia’s top military leadership
Russia 'Coup' Live Forecast
I looked under my William Sonoma grinder today, and the metal screws and bracket near the ceramic grinder are in fine shape.
> Inspired by the larger sites that are now charging for core functionality, Scholarsome intends to be a drop-in replacement for any study workflow.

What „larger sites“ does it refer to? All the comments here are about Anki but this seems to target something else?
Proclaimed universal values, selectively applied, is rhetorical cover for national self interest
I'm aware of context switching but that doesn't apply to finite tasks that fit within a predefined timebox of e.g. less than half a day. And there are a lot of those out there.

Presupposing that all programming is in the pursuit of grand designs (i.e. it take half a day to a day to make meaningful progress on any task) is the only thing that would justify it. But the reality is, it isn't like that except for a subset of specific engineers in specific roles and industries.
> no one training these models feeds their own proprietary source code into publicly available models

You are presupposing that the company’s own code would somehow be a massive boon for the model, resulting in lower loss overall.

In reality, it would skew the model towards that company’s “mode” of coding which isn’t what “normal” programmers expect. In fact, they are most likely to expect the coding styles they learned from, and that is most likely to be found in public examples (GitHub, StackOverflow, textbooks, Reddit, etc.)

This argument is so silly to me. Anyone who has worked at a large enterprise, whether it’s Google, Amazon or Target, knows that company code is effectively guaranteed to be extremely hard to work with. This happens for organizational reasons and really the best thing to do about it is admit that it’s happening rather than pretend it’s all perfect.
Some open source licenses are fine with AI training, eg. MIT No Attribution https://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit-0/ and BSD Zero Clause https://choosealicense.com/licenses/0bsd/

My view is that it's good to allow AI training to use your code. This democratises AI models, otherwise AI will be the exclusive preserve of wealthy corporations. So I say, let's license our code under permissive, no attribution licences!
By that logic: Windows 10 on my Threadripper 3970x with 256G of RAM should be comparably fast to Windows NT as presented.

Since the aggregate GHz and RAM on offer is more than 25x the minimum spec for windows 10.

Win10 min spec is 1GHz w/ 2GB of RAM - my machine is more than one hundred times faster, yet, everything TFA says is true.
> It was pretty sure, that dark mode can only be implemented using JS

I used this in the 90's:

`<body bgcolor="#000000">`

You needed it to really appreciate the sparks from animated fire gifs.
That's a disingenuous comparison. PCIe is not USB-C. You are comparing apples to oranges.

The Framework laptop expansion cards are all USB-C dongles in a different form factor. It's purely an esthetic choice. You don't like the dangle. Thats a valid opinion. I have a USB-C hub that handles all the connections I need in a dongle-dangle.

The only real objective benefit of it, IMO, (and this is HUGE) is the repairability. I am a huge fan of that, and hope that other makes would step up (or be forced to step up) and make the same kind of changes.
In a park in Stuttgart a man approached us as we were walking the dog, and after realising we spoke English politely said "You must not be aware, dogs must be on lead here".
This goes right to the discussion in the first couple chapters of _Promise Theory_, laying out the difference between a promise and an obligation. An obligation requires global knowledge, whereas a promise is local in scope, necessarily voluntary.
> The park could contain loose soil on the edge of a cliff, so any vehicle driving there could cause a landslide that topples the vehicle over the cliff and could kill anyone on the beach below. No vehicles in the park.

Have you ever looked at the warning signs on water heaters? They make it instantly clear what the dangers are and how bad they can be. A "No vehicles in the park" sign in that situation would be the equivalent of just putting "Caution: Hot" on a water heater.

Similarly, parks have signs with people literally drowning and being killed to make it abundantly clear how dangerous they can be.
"Retro-future" is a common term for it, at least in certain blogs and forums.
Your rarity is another man's frequency. Defining all programming in terms of long drawn out creative endeavours isn't very useful, which is the point I was making to begin with.
Of course there is. You get to benefit from the latest versions of GNOME or KDE plus thousands of packages that have more recent versions in rolling distros.
"even NASA" implies that NASA is the objective paragon of software development. There are many ways to develop software, and while I have never worked for NASA I can virtually guarantee that their development process is not the same as some random web service.

I've found that it's better to think of unit tests as a contract. You don't write them to check your code for bugs, you write them to declare an explicit (though incomplete) contact that's checked in to source control.
> obviously police and ambulances (and fire trucks) doing their jobs don't have to follow the sign.

An emergency or service vehicle in practice could have an overriding exemption rule (or not and just ignore some rules without retaliation), but they still violate "No vehicles in the park".
Somebody that used both magic keyboard+mouse and logitech mx keys + their mouse, what do you think?
Might also be a case of envy and sour gapes, and not reflect all that well on the Europeans saying that.

This thread is full of people claiming Europeans are not boastful or self-promoting, which is pretty strange to me because the internet is full of Europeans boasting about how much better their countries allegedly are than the US about almost any subject you can think of. Healthcare, public transport, crime, politics, you name it. But you find one topic where US is unquestionably better than Europe (like rocketry), and all of a sudden it's a grave sin to boast about things, and the discussion turns into how much better Europe is at not being boastful.