skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Butane and propane are not liquid fuels at standard temperature/pressure; they're pressurized gases. You would not be able to fill them at a gas station pump. GP is talking about an old "white gas" stove (white gas is just gasoline without additives) which were popular before propane stoves dominated over the last 20 years.
Then it uses a different broadcast method that also does not depend on higher level IP addresses.

My point is that high level abstractions, like dedicated broadcast IP address that magically alters the behavior of lower level components, complicate things. Say, there is SO_BROADCAST, but it does nothing for TCP (even though we can imagine how broadcast client-to-server connection initiation might work), and there seems to be disagreement whether it allows to use broadcast address, or instructs to use broadcasts with any address. But Berkley sockets are also from mid-'80s, and it is possible that previous alternatives required manual configuration of low level APIs on each individual supported network to use broadcasts, so that was a step forward.
> and the ability to push out fixes and changes instantly mattered more than all the other features combined.

It mattered for developers. Users couldn’t care less.

While I do agree that back in the day, we missed standardized update systems, we do have them now (Flatpack, Winget, the stores …) and they could have appeared sooner if the industry did not plunge entirely in this web thing.

Sure the old days were not perfect but we are now in such an extreme opposite that your computer doesn’t even compute anything except a browser engine.
The comment about “bashing men” (not by me) was obviously not referring to the article, but to society at large.
Can you outline how you're doing system-wide as blocking? That's news to me!
> but something with fingerprint or face recognition or lock screen quick actions behaves poorly

Maybe I'm not crazy. Twice in the past couple weeks, my phone has seemingly unlocked itself in my pocket and I suspected it was to do with moisture/sweat, but dismissed it as unlikely.

In the first instance, it emergency dialed. I had just hung up the phone and put it away, so I thought I hadn't secured it.

In the second instance, I hadn't touched my phone in several minutes when suddenly my podcadt was overlaid with a demo video from an executive at my company which had opened in Teams. I closed out of that and discovered an unsent text to my wife filled with gibberish and a dozen image attachments.

I have a swipe and fingerprint enabled. My best guess is the mosture is registering my leg through the pocket and swiping it unlocked in an infinite monkeys scenario. I switched to password only for my walks now and haven't had an issue since.
Why? In San Francisco the number of traffic citations issued has fallen to essentially zero. The cops are on strike and no longer perceive any marginal benefit from doing their jobs. They get paid either way.

https://transpomaps.org/san-francisco/ca/sfpd-traffic-enforc...
There's also a social media element. There are many accounts who post close calls along with questions like "who was in the wrong?"

The answers you see are sometimes jaw-dropping[1] and I suspect there's an element of "the blind leading the blind" as people assume some of this is correct.

[1] For example someone posted a close call where a truck turning left nearly hit a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk and the top comments claimed that it was the pedestrian's fault because the red hand was flashing and she should not be in the crosswalk.

Edit: There are also sooo many incidents of psychotic road rage posted on social media that it makes you lose faith in humanity. But it's hard to tell if this is an uptick in incidents or an uptick in visibility.
Why do you think less laws are magically better?

Assuming you’re a programmer, why don’t you just write fewer lines of code?

Maybe we should just have every line of code automatically delete itself after a specified period of time.
Heat, yes.
You say that and it feels like Red Hat never contributed a single line of code to any FOSS projects or doesn't hire any developers to work on FOSS.
All those issues has equality issues that impacts both genders, and solutions that would benefit both men and women generally ignored. Roe vs Wade could be changed into a human rights discussion where every person has a right to demand consent to parenthood before being forced into it. The asymmetry of child birth has up to today dictated different amount of rights for men and women, both before and after birth. Unifying those into a single right, a human right, would bring those issues closer to each other and change how policy is created around them.

Women still get payed significantly less than men, and men work significantly more hours than women and at more dangerous jobs. Those two inequalities also hang together with inequalities related to non-paid work like parenting, and also that men are twice as likely to not have children than women (sometimes refereed to as reproductive inequality). Solving those require a lot of different initiatives that all work in unity to reduce inequality for both men and women.

Women are also at much higher risks of sexual assault, and men are at very higher risk of assault. Reducing sexual assault and assault involves solutions that are fairly similar, ie higher cohesion in society, more trust, and stronger social connections, social networks and social support among the population. Inequality in social economic status is also a strong indicator of high amount of sexual assaults and assault.
i just read the wiki and apparently it's considered a Citizen Legislature and is a part time job, with corresponding pay and most people have another job

i imagine the original goal was to have "regular people" vs "career politicians"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Legislative_Assembly
If your hand smells like gas after using the pump, I'm not sure you're doing it right.
jai is not well known and it being a language and closed source makes it a total non-starter
Marie Antoinette would be proud of you. (I am aware she didn't say Let them eat cake or even Qu’ils mangent de la brioche but that doesn't change the metaphor.)
It's always amazing to me how on this engineering-heavy forum, so many users fail to recognize the benefit some simple engineering can deliver.
Everyone seems to really want to blame cars being too big or whatever, but since cops stopped enforcing traffic violations in many places over covid some drivers have gone absolutely crazy. I'm the last person to ask for _more_ policing but something has to be done here. I also suspect that more and more people are walking in general, although I don't have any evidence for that.
There are liquid fuel camp stoves. White gas is the usual but there are models that will burn pretty much anything. Propane/butane also don't work very well in cold weather although some fuel mixes are better.
You don't have to do this for large construction products. Just do it for the direct competitor: renewable energy. You'll instantly see why France forced the greenwashing of nuclear within the EU.

...or just check the state of EDF S.A.
> The only excuse for the law being around so long was that it created jobs. Which was lame reasoning.

This was my understanding and I agree it is bad reasoning. It might have created jobs, but certainly not good ones.
There were 488 Pedestrian deaths in France in 2022, (pop. 57 million, 3 times less likely)

There were 57 in holland (pop 17 million, 6 times less likely)
There are a few more factors that drive this number up. First is the absolute reliance on cars for basically everything; anyone not in a car is a second-class citizen that can be killed at any time without much thought given by the public other than the typical "It's just unavoidable, these things happen. What can you do?" Another factor driving this number up is the massive increase in average car size, as SUVs and pickup trucks are pushed harder on average citizens by car companies so they can skirt taxes and make more profits.

Add on top of this huge roads and extremely anti-pedestrian laws and you have successfully created a death trap for people walking.
You could easily equate that statement to a “mother protecting and caring for her children”

It’s pretty trite and meaningless to boil every dependent relationship into one of slavery.

In the past, most women had to pick between marriage with an established man so she can have many kids starting young, versus working for herself and having no or few kids.

It’s no surprise many women chose marriage.
Sometimes motorcycle campers still use them so they can combine their cooking fuel supply and emergency fuel supply
Stop signs basically dont work anywhere. If you want people to drive slowly, you have to build streets that make them do so.

If anyone is interested in this stuff, the youtube channel NotJustBikes talks a lot about this and related topics. Here's a short video on how "traffic calming" infrastructure gets drivers to slow down, and we all know that stop signs just dont.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tGOBOw9s-QM
Never used an adblocker. Advertising doesn't bother me in principle, only if it gets irritating (like those excruciatingly annoying BK commercials!). If advertising gets to be too annoying, well that's what the back button is for.
Inventing a 94 year old battery is definitely more impressive than inventing a 0 year old one like people usually do. ;)
In the parts of Europe I lived in (France, Switzerland, Sweden) there is one additional important thing: there is usually at most one parking space per apartment. This makes everything already a lot denser.
Why? Because I believe they're wrong. I think it's just wrong to engage with any business and disable, sidestep or circumvent their way to make money. It's like shoplifting. It reminds of people who open up a box at the supermarket, eat the food, and then claim that the barcode was on the box so that must be what's for sale.

I want the Internet to have ad supported content. I want the people who create this content to have a chance of making a fair, market-determined income instead of relying upon things like Patreon.

The saddest part for me is that I'm going to get voted down here because the support for this kind of behavior is strong here. Some day all of you will experience a business being undermined by freeloaders and thieves. This is the kind of low-trust world that you're building and it will come for your livelihood too.
The problem with making this jailable (which I do not support in the absence of a collision) is that you stopping to let a pedestrian legally cross is difficult to distinguish from you stopping in a travel lane or bike lane to pick up an Uber fare or stopping to double park near someone waiting for their own Uber. The latter two cases are actually obstacles created by anti-social behavior and are probably more common in aggregate than drivers stopping for pedestrians.
well it got your attention enough that you appeared to have read at least some of the article so i guess that's a win. everyone got to hustle.
My experience mirrors yours perfectly. When the lockdowns started, people began to drive "crazier" for lack of a better term.

I hesitate to speculate as to what caused it, but the difference was as clear as night and day.
> Larger companies should be held to a higher standard because their actions have a wider impact

Sure. My point is this has nothing to do with too big to fail.

Also, what is the impact of these records being deleted? If you have a claim that reasonably involves them, it is basically cashable due to the error. If nobody can show damages, it’s hard to argue this mistake had a wide impact.
There's plenty of liquid fuel stoves around, although butane/propane is probably more common. I like them because the fuel is cheaper and more available, and you can reuse the containers. The downside is they must be "primed" by preheating the with a bit of liquid fuel, so that the fuel comes out vaporized. I prefer kerosene/diesel over white gas/gasoline because it runs a bit hotter and is safer (at the cost of more difficult priming).

Liquid fuel stoves can also be run in very cold temperatures, where butane mixtures or propane stop working.
>But the real giga-brained answer, which most programmer-type people probably aren't emotionally ready to accept, is that not only are the ways we organize our directories wrong, but tree-based directories are just dumb in general. Everything should just go in one big directory and you can use names and tags to sort them out. Programmers are culturally obsessed with trees.

Java will die before it gives up its practice of "let's organized code in a series of nested directories where each directory is the next qualifier in the package name"
Suchh divisions are superficial to most Rastaman. As per Peter Tosh:

https://genius.com/Peter-tosh-african-lyrics
Here's a thread where residents of Albuquerque, the city with the highest rate of pedestrian deaths in the US.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Albuquerque/comments/123uyd3/pedest...

It seems that's mostly the consensus. A combination of bad design and distracted drivers/pedestrians. It seems J-walking is a real issue and I've driven through there and the speeds are pretty fast (which should be fine in theory but ofc not fine if people are J-walking).

Also seems to be a fair amount of people on drugs wandering into the street. Seems like a perfect storm.
Well in my opinion, "Vision Zero" in the US will apply only to the peons. If you are connected with Law Enforcement or Politicians, you get a free pass unless you kill someone in such a manner that it cannot be brushed under the carpet.
> I can't believe the EU, which has fined Microsoft because of having IE as the default browser, is OK with Apple having a total walled garden in iOS.

They aren't ok with it. The EU recently passed the Digital Markets Act. But some of the provisions don't take effect until 2024.
Why do you say it led to redash's downfall? What happened to redash since the acquisition?
Been to quite a few gas stations in eastern Oregon that have these advertisement screens. I reckon it’s only a matter of time.
A walkable city doesn’t have to be an ant colony. American exceptionalism really is hard to grasp sometimes.

Take a look at a city like Brussels to understand how a capital city can be both walkable and high density without being Seoul.
My point is that does nothing, because the root problem of destinations being too far from one another is not addressed.

A few more buses and trains are not going to cut it. You need to outcompete the convenience of a personal car. The bus or train has to run at least every 10min, otherwise one missed connection and you’re wasting 20min+ with your refrigerated groceries.

And that type of frequency is simply not economical without density. Chicken and egg at this point. Best case scenario is to build outwards from already dense areas, but it will involve eminent domain and demolishing buildings and parking lots to make new ones that are pedestrian friendly and hostile to cars.
This.

The even numbered year session was added relatively recently (i.e. within the last 20 years.) And the minority party still complains when major when major work is done during that period of time, because “that’s not what it is for”.
I don't think the section you quote tells the whole story

> If you want to unlock features or functionality within your app, (by way of example: subscriptions, in-game currencies, game levels, access to premium content, or unlocking a full version), you must use in-app purchase.

> Apps may use in-app purchase currencies to enable customers to “tip” the developer or digital content providers in the app.

Using "must" for unlocking features and "may" for tipping is pretty odd if they need to be treated identically.

This is especially clear if you look later in the document where an almost identical phrasing is used in the other direction:

> If your app enables the purchase of real-time person-to-person services between two individuals you may use purchase methods other than in-app purchase to collect those payments.

> If your app enables people to purchase physical goods or services that will be consumed outside of the app, you must use purchase methods other than in-app purchase to collect those payments

Certainly the person-to-person transactions aren't required to use purchase methods other than in-app purchase despite the use of "may" in the same context.

This section could probably invalidate it although its extremely confusing because only "reader" apps (3.1.3(a)) are allowed to direct to other purchasing methods but physical goods apps are required not to use IAP. How would they avoid using IAP if they can't direct to other mechanisms?

> Apps and their metadata may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase, except as set forth in 3.1.3(a).
Not trying to convince you to chase strenuous cardio. There are many, many activities that can support living a healthy life.

That being said...

I really don't know any serious athletes who enjoy going to practices or going to the gym to workout. In my opinion it's rarely about enjoying the moment. Rather, it's about the way it makes a person feel when they're done. Or, it's about reaching a long-term goal and the joy that comes with accomplishing something currently out of reach.

And, of course, that type of joy can come from a wide variety of activities - exercise, coding, music, arts, etc.

Edit: Removed unnecessary quotes.
Why not extend to Fedora? At the risk of starting a distro religious war…

After many years away from the RedHat ecosystem I recently tried to stand up Fedora 37 and 38 to test it with Willow Inference Server.

After hours and hours of poor and conflicting docs, random stability issues, various additional software repos of questionable quality, etc I gave up and proclaimed it officially unsupported.

Why anyone would want to waste their time being a tester for a commercial product is very strange to me when there is Debian and even Arch which (for a rolling release) seems to be substantially more stable, better documented, etc.

I understand why it exists and it has its place but absent a few specific scenarios I have no idea why it would be a first choice for anyone.
Because its a pain in the ass and going along with it is essentially signing yourself up for the next time they want to try squeezing for money.
The Reasons More People Are Working in Their 80s
https://archive.ph/JzyJa
Only in the US. Plenty of "rapeseed oil" on the shelves here in Europe.
> the constant wordplay

That's why I consider them more adult comics. I discover something new every time I re-read them.
"Safety"

You can pump your own diesel, or your own gas for a motorcycle. But it was for Class 1 (I forget number) flammable liquids
You mean, the valuable support they are increasingly shifting to Colombia, Philippines and India?
> require a generational shift to deploy.

Photonic bandgap / Bragg fiber is being produced in quantity, and some subsea cables are using it.

I'm pretty sure it's the satellite lasers that require the generational shift. One subsea cable has no bearing on any other; once the first is installed, you're up and running. not so with laser-connected swarms.
I would be most curious to see the data. From my reading of the news in my surrounding 30 miles the details are almost always:
1. downtown or country road late/nighttime driver hits transient
2. daytime freeway driver hits transient
3. rural biker/runner gets hit by drunk or early morning commuter
Is this a rebranded Stadia?
Seems like preventing drowning is a key reason to start early. That is why I started early for both of my kids. Too many stories about kids wandering into pools and dying to not take it seriously.
Their moat was to be able to spin up spark clusters for you. This was very useful when companies just starting in that space and don’t have the skills. But with K8s and clusters becoming more common for normal workload, it’s not hard to manage your own spark clusters anymore. There goes their moat. Their other offerings just aren’t that amazing. People now don’t just want to buy hand tools anymore, they want power tools. AI/ML and its cousins are in the power tool space.

Databrick cost is stupid high, like snowflake. Any companies looking to chop budget would put those contracts up first.
Why Arc Isn't Especially Object-Oriented
> "Densification" can eaily lead to poorer quality of life and oppressive housing, though.

Where I lived, there used to be tons of orange groves, beautiful natural areas, trails, and fields to ride your bike through. They all turned into suburban houses. Tracts of homes with huge offsets. Cars zooming by at 60 mph on streets so wide it takes half a minute to cross them on foot, all while dodging cars.

Some people try to make it sound like densification will lead to Soviet era buildings or everyone living in Skyscrapers. But it mostly just leads to the city staying in the city instead of spreading out like a cancerous tumor across farmland and nature.
https://twitter.com/siwatanejo/status/1668585129374289925
These US cities can and should be made walkable again.

I say again, because they used to be. Even Houston didn't used to be such a car-focused hellhole.
I don't think this sort of emotional, loose-facted "hot take" style response is real constructive. I'm unhappy about this decision by Red Hat, and am also very concerned about the trajectory RH is on. For the first time in well over a decade I'm re-evaluating which ecosystem to base all my work (and the company(ies) for who I make decisions). I don't believe that Red Hat's leadership cares a whole lot about open source anymore. If they do, they've demonstrated that they are willing to harm open source in order to (short-term at least) increase sales. (congrats salespeople, you finally won and killed CentOS. And congrats to all the people who used to tell the salesperson "I can run CentOS for free, why should I buy RHEL?")

But that said, as far as I know, one guy used the term "freeloaders" and the context wasn't clear at all who he was talking about, and certainly not clear whether that is one person's opinion or the company's opinion. I find it incredibly unlikely that he was talking about people who used CentOS and actually contributed to the community. But either way, attributing that to Red Hat as a whole is completely unfair and unproductive. Every big organization is going to have at least one person with an opinion they don't agree with, and painting the entire org with the brush of one person is fallacious.

What's the goal here? Is it to polarize into good and evil sides? Get people to dig in and defend their ground for fear of the "other side" seizing their words or decisions and holding it over them?

I like a lot of OP's content, but I am a little worried that he's a little too immersed in the Youtube success formula of tapping into emotions (particularly rage and anger) and it's driving him to a very emotional take on this issue.
DC already has an enormous police:population ratio. If more policing were the answer, surely DC would be on the forefront of using police to stop traffic violations.

Police cannot effectively solve this issue. This requires engineering. DC's super wide, straight streets tell drivers "its safe to go really fast here, you have a ton of space". That's where the problem starts, and thats where the solution has to start.
>generally happening in cross walks in cities

Do you have a source for this?
No, because our oxygen consumption is accounted for by the rest of the biosphere (the oxygen producers). We don't consume so much that we could realistically run out.
It's not OSS. You can only use it for open source projects for free, otherwise you have to pay $1000/yr to use it.

Or $2,000 a year if your company wants to pay by invoice.