skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Meanwhile, our flexible options seem to be working, creating a differentiator in the market

It will be interesting to see how the return to office/remote work debate will be settled by the competitive market. If remote work is such a big draw for top talent (and increases productivity), companies that offer remote flexibility will outperform companies that don’t, since they will attract better employees who are also more productive. If, on the other hand, remote work leads to a decrease in productivity (as return to office proponents claim), it may be the case that the better talent wooed by companies offering remote positions will be offset by the drop in productivity from remote work.

It may also be the case that remote flexibility simply isn’t that big of a draw, and companies with remote options won’t attract significantly better talent than companies without them.
A new approach to controlling the properties of turbulence
I’ve had a Nissan LEAF for 8.5 years. Everything the Nissan dealer has done has been free (service bulletins and a warranty repair [maybe a second for airbag, I forget).

Everything else has been an easy DIY, meaning a corner/independent mechanic could have done it just as easily.
Look up a periodic table and correlate the highlighted letters with numbers on said table.

Change, remove, modify letters until you reach 200 based on the sum of their atomic numbers.

For easy cheese, add H to increment by 1. Repeat capital H until you have reached the sum if you are under. Easy to later add and remove H until you satisfy the condition.
Which states? State-level corruption varies widely in mining and extraction from obsequious duplicity to open full-service facilitation. This is all about money from the climate-change denial, omnicidal fools who believe an unlivable planet would still be survivable with a pile of money.
> 45 years of precedent says they're included

Not quite.

As recently as in 2006, Rapanos decided "the CWA’s use of 'waters' encompasses 'only those relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water ‘forming geographic[al] features’ that are described in ordinary parlance as ‘streams, oceans, rivers, and lakes.’"

Also:
"More recently, the agencies have engaged in a flurry of
rulemaking defining 'the waters of the United States.' In a 2015 rule, they offered a muscular approach that would subject 'the vast majority of the nation’s water feature' to a case-by-case jurisdictional analysis. Although the rule listed a few examples of 'waters' that were excluded from regulation like '[p]uddles' and 'swimming pools,' it categorically covered other waters and wetlands, including any within 1,500 feet of interstate or traditional navigable waters. And it subjected a wider range of other waters, including any within 4,000 feet of indirect tributaries of interstate or traditional navigable waters, to a case-specific determination for significant nexus.

The agencies repealed this sweeping rule in 2019. Shortly afterwards, they replaced it with a narrower definition that limited jurisdiction to traditional navigable waters and their tributaries, lakes, and 'adjacent' wetlands. They also narrowed the definition of '[a]djacent,' limiting it to wetlands that '[a]but' covered waters, are flooded by those waters, or are separated from those waters by features like berms or barriers. This rule too did not last. After granting the EPA’s voluntary motion to remand, a District Court vacated the rule."

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-454_4g15.pdf
> it was a summary of the purpose of the LGBT issue to counter the parent’s straw-man that summarized LGBT as being a binary harassment vs praise issue.

?

You may want to reread what I wrote because the last thing I was trying to do was argue a "strawman that summarized LGBT as being harassment vs praise". In fact, I was arguing exactly the same thing you seem to be arguing here: that this is a false dichotomy being preached by the loud minority, and that taking a balanced middle ground is a fine idea.

However, I do find it funny that you're offended about someone being pedantic with your argument when it seems like that's the exact same thing you did with my original comment.
The majority of their revenue actually comes from the service department.
Costco sells the folding Jetson Haze e-bike (350w; 15.5m/h ~= 25km/h) for $550.

https://www.costco.com/jetson-haze-electric-bike.product.400...
I thought I was being so clever by filling up the password field with food, so I could buy lots of time to search YouTube. I didn't realise Paul could be overfed :'(
And for those who are tmux users, zellij can be configured to be more space efficient, ie reduce borders to a single line. There are even tmux bindings.

I've since grown fond of zellij's locked mode which hides all keybindings behind a Ctrl+G toggle. That behaves more like vim modes than the awkward Ctrl+B in tmux.
I believe the same technique was used with early "live webcams" too — utilising a quirk (or maybe it was an intentional feature) of the GIF format allowed the server to just "send more frames."

I seem to recall GIF even allowed you to change the palette mid-animation for this purpose (although would love to know if there was any other purpose.)

Had the side-effect of making it impossible to download the GIF as the server would never close the connection.
And still the risk of death was much higher than the risk you're comparing it to. And that's ignoring the cumulative effect of infection not to mention secondary effects on resourcing.

Are you serious about this point?
This is very impressive. Did you use a library for Arrow or did you build your own? We have sometimes faced issues when using the PyArrow library.
> both of those are easy to read

Most accessibility problems aren't things that those without some sort of sensory disability (beyond mild long-sightedness) can detect easily - at least, without using tools to do so.

Surely though there is some sort of "accessible" mode you can put it into that does improve the contrast?
I have heard these are 100k each... anyone know if that's correct? Guessing that's list, and no one pays list, but still...
Good point and question. Don't know. One possible thing is that the insurance companies value higher premiums more than lower payouts.
> constantly ass laws just to tell the executive branch they are abusing their powers.

Nobody is suggesting that. The basic argument is if both the executive and the judiciary misinterpret a law for decades then it’s the legislative branch’s job to correct that “misunderstanding” not the judiciary. This is why it’s called a common law, past court cases clarify the rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law

When president exists it’s the judiciaries job to maintain the status quo not to arbitrarily change the rules after it’s already made up its mind, unless there is some clear conflict. The fundamental principle at play is if the judicial branch can flip flop arbitrarily then president is meaningless and everything can be relitigated endlessly.

Edit: There’s many sources of conflict even without changes to the law as lower courts should be self consistent but there’s independence between them. Which might seem strange but creates some redundancy as consistent rulings reinforce precedent while conflicting rulings invite intervention by a higher court.
This was fun until I reached the time-sensitive rules
Transgender Identity and Suicide Attempts and Mortality in Denmark
I have electric lights and a smoke detector in all rooms and some battery flash lights or torches with no fire and never leap from windows.
Commercial property market forces might be stronger...
The hidden cost of air quality monitoring
Any water vapor that gets into the fluid won’t be removed by brake application, so your flush interval will be no different.
pardons tend to be issued in bulk on leaving office
Presidents usually wait until the very end of their final term before _really_ issuing pardons (so questions about the really eyebrow-raising ones, and every president has at least a few, don’t dog them for the rest of their time in office). I would bet big money Biden issues just as many as Trump, Obama, Bush et al once it’s all said and done.
> I'm not sure that the current locations that companies like BP and Shell have for gas stations would work for EV charging station.

North America is behind on EV infrastructure. The current fighting over which plug to use will delay it by some more years. In Europe there are many fuel station style charging locations. For example:

- Shell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qR2M5W6saAk

- Circle K: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TVohXHjLro

- GridServe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoN4WCpuxHY

- BP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1PZJtnuiIU

> 15x faster than the fastest charging EV at a Supercharger

Shell's new station has 400 kW CCS chargers, but the problem is on the battery side more than the charger side. EVs can't make full use of the charger's available power across the whole charge curve. Better, fast charging batteries are needed.
In your iterm profile settings, you can configure new tabs to go to either $HOME, $CWD, or a fixed specific directory. I've configured new windows and tabs to $HOME, but new split panes $CWD.
I think the whole "true threats" concept is backwards. It is false threats that should be prohibited.

Lets say there is some guy at the park who really loves a particular dandelion. If you step on this dandelion this guy will stab you. I would much rather the guy announce this ahead of time, rather then just silently knife me in the kidney. If I know about the threat I can take steps to avoid it.

True threats are valuable information to have.
Yet another battle won in the 0 indexing vs. 1 indexing war
yeah from 201 years to only 100. this is still a win. he better hope his lawyer knows some silicon valley people and can hook his client with some life extension
In my job, I’ve gotten some pretty detailed experience with this part of the Clean Water Act.

Not mentioned in this article is the fact that the “substantial nexus” standard just rejected by the Supreme Court was ridiculously vague, and the process by which landowners could determine whether there existed a “substantial nexus” between wet-ish areas on their property and navigable waterways was ridiculously slow and uncertain. (But with potentially huge civil and even criminal penalties to those who guessed wrong.)

The process, in recent years: first you hire an specialized wetlands consulting firm whom you pay many thousands of dollars to compile a document that argues, in highly technical language, that no substantial nexus exists. You submit this “Request for Jurisdictional Determination”, which may run more than 100 pages long, to the Army Corps of Engineers. They respond whenever they get around to it. Maybe six months later you get an answer. More often than not, they claim jurisdiction, and then you have to file for an Army Corps dredge/fill permit that might take another six months to be issued.

Note that complaining about this painful process doesn’t imply a belief that waterways shouldn’t be protected. There are other land use restrictions (think: local zoning restrictions or FEMA flood plain building code restrictions) that are often very stringent, but at least their application is CLEAR. In most cases, a property owner or prospective buyer can determine the property’s zoning and flood plain status in five minutes by examining the relevant maps online.

No such clarity has existed regarding the location of Waters of the United States under the CWA. Hopefully this ruling will lead to a more clear-cut situation.
This reminds me of how a court declared that San Diego's overgrown drainage system was a protected wetland and they had to offset it in order to dredge it out and keep a century flood from happening.
This just reads like a hit piece written by an intellectually uncurious and fragile person. It's not even an interesting hit piece.
I know someone who briefly had a startup that sold a service like this. Facebook sued them and they folded.
Heat had nothing to do with it. The internal resistance of the battery increases as it wears out, lowering the peak output current.

Increased heat when operating near the current limit is a symptom, not a cause. Adding a fan or a chonky heatsink to your iPhone wouldn't magically raise this limit.
Oh these are just pictures and not also videos? I guess that is indeed old hat. Maybe this one at least gets birth marks right by learning from Facebook and Instagram swimming photos.
Human Or Not: Guess if you're chatting with an AI or a Human
Me and my friend think that some companies are doing this as a way to lay people off without laying people off. If that's the case, it's a severe miscalculation as the employees most likely to leave are in theory, the best ones. They believe in themselves and that they can get another (remote) job very easily.
The Lone Banana Problem. Or, the new programming: “speaking” AI
The quality of framing wood you choose does not factor into home longevity at all. If you follow standard stick framing practices (16" or 24" OC) use the correct sheathing and fasteners, there will be no difference.

What really determines how long a house will last is water/moisture management.
If they follow the Tesla/Rivian/Lucid model they'd have "galleries" which might have a few cars on hand to show off, see paint and fabric samples, hopefully have someone knowledgeable on hand to answer questions, and test drive but you then go place an order for a new one.

There are a few Tesla galleries near me despite not being legal to be sold in my state.
In Braiding Sweetgrass, Kimmerer waxes poetic about the pharmacopia contained in marsh plants. Cattails alone have a ton of stuff going on. If you live in anaerobic rot your whole life you gotta have some good anti-microbials going on. It's practically the aloe vera of wetlands. Or maybe aloe vera is the cattails of drylands.

There's a lot of other reasons to protect wetlands. The tiny little one I was involved with was the water fountain for all of the local pollinators. Water access in the middle of the summer in the PNW is a serious challenge. It was one of the first times I encountered bees and wasps who were too busy doing their thing to even care that I was there.
These could train GPT-3 in 46 hours. (Edited from "11 mins" per https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36500154 )

An equivalent number of V100's (GPT-3's original GPU) would've taken about 36 days [0].

0 – https://www.reddit.com/r/GPT3/comments/p1xf10/comment/h8h3sl...
> trying to understand if the people saying "congress can just fix this" every time the supreme court makes a ruling

Because it's what the current Court is saying. They're pushing back against Chevron's deference to agency rule making.

Congress didn't say a thing, agencies wrote a rule, the courts deferred; SCOTUS is saying that last part was incorrect, the agencies never had the power to write that rule. Congress needed to do it.
Can we compare a sitting president to former presidents? I feel like pardons are something you do on the way out the door.
is there any evidence for or against this? re: CP, not video games.

I'd search the literature myself, but searching anything about it is too sketchy for me.
Yes. But this isn’t a general payment protocol that the payment industry developed to facilitate convenient payment applications. It’s an application-specific protocol that had to be developed at enormous cost for the specific application of charging and only really happened because EU regulators pushed very hard on charging companies and manufacturers to realize it. The US gets to benefit from it (if we’re lucky) because Europe did the work, although it’s not supported by Tesla and many of the smaller charging services don’t support it.

My point is that a IoT payment protocol should have been a part of the EMV standard, the same one that lets me use my credit card while overseas. We shouldn’t have to rely on such a huge government-backed effort specific to every specific business sector where a device might need to pay for a service.
I think c is legitimate. Our federal institutions are breaking down due to the public’s mistrust of congress. Its a completely broken institution and both parties are relying on that fact to move toward a more culture war based platform instead of talking about policy, since everyone knows there will be no policy.
In this tutorial, we will learn how to set up Prometheus rules and configure Alertmanager to send alerts to a Slack channel. Prometheus is a popular monitoring and alerting solution in the Kubernetes ecosystem, while Alertmanager handles alert management and routing. By integrating with Slack, you can receive real-time notifications for any issues or anomalies in your Kubernetes cluster.
If you don't increase your standard of living, it will. (Or the other caveats of course; assuming you're not already close to retirement, impending economic catastrophe or whatever).

Doubling salary post-tax will at the very least put you at a 50% savings rate, and that yields a time from zero to financial independence of 16.5 years. Assuming historically-similar stock market returns and a safe withdrawal rate of 4%. This relationship does not depend on absolute numbers beyond those stated above, only savings rate.

Most likely you'd not be starting from zero and having a positive savings rate already. Whether you'd be comfortable doing this is a different question. Many would never be, and hence never completely comfortable retiring.
No every level sets precedent, making precedent is a side effect not their role.

Historically only a small fraction of Supreme Court cases have overturned precedent without a conflict at lower levels.
This is what happen when societies treat something as taboo. People who seek help can't have it: https://medium.com/matter/youre-16-youre-a-pedophile-you-don...
With the resources of a nation state, why not just put real child porn on a device or two and call the local authorities?
I thought the H100s were ~30-40k each. But they're not widely available and you usually buy multiple boxes from vendors that also come with expensive CPUs/RAM etc.
> No disrespect to folks in these fields

Why not? You can absolutely call people out for using Nuremberg defense. Just because someone ordered you to intentionally mistreat people doesn't mean that you did not intentionally mistreat people.
> Statutes are frequently written in vague terms with the intent of having the executive branch make a reasonable interpretation

Page 6 of the Opinion [1] does a good job summarizing what Congress wrote, what it meant at the time, how it was amended by the courts and agencies over the years, and how it's changed since 2015. Nothing appears to be corruptly constructed.

[1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-454_4g15.pdf
Just to be clear, your ISP gives you an IPv6 but not an IPv4?
The stuff Apple does is even more blatantly anti-consumer than their competitors. The difference is that Apple have fans who will defend them, in a way that Microsoft, Google or Facebook don't really. It's the reality distortion field, not Apple being better at straddling the line.
I think that creating money always raises prices, so you're probably merely being screwed less, rather than being subsidized.

(I count loans as "creating money" because buyers look at how much X to buy based on how costly it is to borrow money. People are seeing this in the housing market now; when loans were 2.5%, sellers raised their price to fit the monthly payment budget. Now at 7%, it's harder to sell at those prices. If everyone had to pay cash for everything, everything would probably be cheaper, because money would be intrinsically more valuable.)
At likely negative cost to the company.
Nor servicing them, further down the line.
On the LEAF, it’s an inspect-only item. There is no replacement interval specified.
Again, why would congress include these provisions in the next NDAA if they didn’t think Grusch’s comments held enough weight?
> Namely, the government wouldn’t tell you if your property was a wetland until after it thought you’d violated the law.
If you can avoid rounding then your answers will be more accurate. But that's almost entirely separate from how big your "1" is.

If you set "1" to be "2^40 dollars (~1.1 trillion)", then $1 is represented as 2^-40. Adding that up 100 times will have no rounding, and give you exactly the same result as a deposit of $100.

On the opposite side of things, setting "1" to be "3 dollars" or "70 cents" would cause rounding errors all over, even though that's barely different in scale.
Yes I just learned it’s supported by EA. But not by some of the other charging services.
Why did you switch to Sly?
Show HN: eda – the video editor for making banger product demos in your browser
Generally I agree with you but there’s also not anything stopping you from writing me a check for fifty grand. Nothing incentivizes them to disclose anything. I’m not too crazy about the state of affairs either.
> arbitrarily change the rules after it’s already made up its mind.

It is often the precedent which was arbitrary.
I hate that when I use `less`, then quit, the output goes away.
No, I just don’t like being compared to someone believing something blind. If Grusch was alleging that there are undisclosed programs reverse engineering other country technology, it would be taken seriously. But the subject brings stigma and that’s what needs to change. We shouldn’t be afraid to investigate these claims just because they seem incredibly outlandish.
Looking at the graphic shared in TFA, this app, typically used to spy on kids and women, seems to have a huge cluster of customers from India and the US. One country with the most social trust deficit and the other with most money.

Also, this won't be the last time that an offensive tech company has the most questionable security.

I have been saying this for a long time now [0] (and not only because I co-maintain one): a network monitor has got to be the first thing that goes on everyone's smartphones.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19546159
I started this just before midnight, and once I got to the wordle question it didn't work. Possibly because the wordle had changed since starting the password game
It’s from the law. The EPA is the one that made up the definition of wetlands to include ones that weren’t navigable as required by the law.

But yes, they can just make up definitions if they want. The NYC may issue gun law case from last year had that with the infamous “historical tradition of firearm regulation” ruling. We have a common law system which means that judicial rulings from federal appellate courts are law in their jurisdiction. The only thing stopping them I guess is the fear of another Andrew Jackson deciding they’re illegitimate and ignoring them.