skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you’re mistaken, in that it’s naturally the same consciousness but different identities and recognisably different/altered personality states that come in and out in DID. The consciousness itself is always the same and continuous.
> hard to enjoy a sunset next to a gorgeous cathedral on a cliff when your city is 100 years old and flat

Just get a pair of those Apple VR goggles.

Is it the same? No. Is the difference worth destroying the planet? Hell no.
I had this feeling when I first saw the Nile.

Holy shit is that thing HUGE.
I wish @dang would weigh in. Either unflag it (as I hope) on the grounds of it being a key event of high interest to curious people or confirm that this doesn't belong on HN (which would be a valid point, too).
"Finally got it" aka "what it really is" is always an arbitrary interpretation. Why not view it as a finite cousin of 2-adic numbers? The article doesn't even mention modular arithmetic.

Here, "finally getting it" means going from "the way computers represent negative numbers, chosen to make the math work out" to "the way computers represent negative numbers, chosen to make the math work out, but I poked around with a few examples."
Comes from its creator, Gregory Nutt.
Someone walking can plausibly be on a phone or similarly badly distracted. The tricyclist, whether walking or riding slowly around people, cannot. You or the toddler are far more likely to be trampled by a careless pedestrian than run over by a cyclist of any form (and even less by a recumbent tricyclist than an upright bicyclist) in a shared space.
You're right in that assumption but not because you putting words in my mouth. I said companies that don't do take-homes get lower priority during scheduling.
Can't have peasants holding the masters accountable. That just won't do.
Categorically false
Seeing a lot of discourse here talking about how Go releases are so stable and don't break shit. As someone who also loves Go, I mostly agree with these takes, but let's not forget how much of a mess dependency management used to be in the bad old days. I remember Glide, Dep, Godep, etc. I think given the Go teams attitude towards not breaking backwards compatibility we will probably see less breaking upgrades like we see in frontend-land for example, but things were not always this nice and stable.
> You'd also have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the voice wasn't AI generated, that it's your voice and so on and so on.

If you are a defendant in criminal court, you don't need to prove anything. Just to raise doubt and poke holes on any unjust accusation. Innocent until proven guilty implies the accusation are the ones that have to worry about being able to prove something beyond reasonable doubt, ideally.
I meant black box of course.
Agreed. A crucial benefit of two’s complement is that it eliminates the distinction between +0 and -0.
Zephyr RTOS has a bigger community.
Same problem. Doesn't prove that it was created at that point, only that it existed at that point.
Scope hoisting is the technique used there (it's in the title of your link) to simplify tree shaking a.k.a dead code elimination. Also yeah it's unlikely to be what's happening in that bug due to Google using Closure compiler.
> obviously police and ambulances (and fire trucks) doing their jobs don't have to follow the sign.

The test explicitly asked for answers as to whether the rule is followed, not whether its ok to ignore the rule in a given situation. Very obviously a police car or an ambulance is a vehicle in the park.

> Again, please answer the question of whether the rule is violated (not whether the violation should be allowed).
> Also from a purely Doylist point of view, a villain needs a face and a voice, otherwise it's just a force of nature.

I always felt that they don't is exactly what made the Borg so scary; they can't be talked to or negotiated with. They just exist to assimilate. Nothing more or less. No compassion, no humanity. Before the Borg queen they really were a force of nature, but with laser phaser guns and shit.

The replicators in Stargate had the same effect. I felt there too they went too far by explaining the origins and having "human-like" replicators (I'm a bit fuzzy on the details, as I never cared all that much for Stargate and it's been ages since I watched it).
Ok…but why is that so important to you? I guess I am trying to understand the motivation behind people who are insisting on splitting hairs to downplay or denigrate the circumstantial evidence that points toward a lab leak.

I mean I can understand if there was an accidental lab leak of an engineered virus that killed millions was created in a Chinese lab with American tax dollars why those involved might want that information suppressed and to go away but why is it important to Klinky to take up that cause?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36456034 (EDIT: side note, it seems there is a surprising number of people for whom it seems incredibly important that this is on the front page, but that don't take part in the discussion about it. why? Something not being on the front page doesn't mean you can't discuss it!)
My guess — and this is a guess, not an assertion — is that the hard problem is one of physics and not cognitive science or neuroscience per se.
> Usually the lie is in your own code or bad dependencies

The lie is almost always in an external API response from fetch (hence the complaint about “any” above).

> Could you provide examples?

Off the top of my head… Go’s stdlib json.Unmarshal and Rust’s Serde derive Deserialize.
they tend to be small and ephemeral

I'm part of two such communities that each have tens of thousands of active members, and have both been online for at least 15 years.

Generalizations are rarely accurate.
whats your go to site for domain whois?

One of them used to be robtex.com [1] but now they require a login to see most info. The same has happened to most other useful utility sites. Once they get popular they require logins. Most of the time I just use the command line tool whois. This should be available on Mac and if it isn't in Windows I assume it could be installed via WSL or Cygwin.

[1] - https://www.robtex.com/
Looks like this one was also flagged.
I'm using one called Salbree from Amazon. But looking at the pictures of the other ones, many brands of them look identical, like they're made in the same factory.
> Hard to be taken out of context if the audio is cross-referenced with upload date and time, GPS position, your heart rate, oxygen level, sleep patterns, step count, etc...

Defendant: here I said "Yes".

Plaintiff: that's when I asked "did you do the illegal thing?"
Be sure to listen to his recent interview on the Shuttlepod podcast. Direct link:

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/ep-2-10-the-house-of-q...
And above 4M? (My recollection is most people are complaining about some absolute whale accounts.)

I'm also curious on the 4.9 being "high yield." You are right that most of us have things in a checking account that is often sub 1%. Every bank I've ever been to had easy ways to convert that to a higher number. Usually you had to use their card or some such. (Such that, I would still agree that 4.9 is high, but not absurdly so.)

And don't forget that the risk had emphatically nothing to do with that percent versus the treasure bonds. It was depositors withdrawing. Presumably to put their money somewhere with higher yields, if rational. More likely it was to get it out and put it somewhere with, again, sub 1%.
There's something that goes on inside the heads of organisms sufficiently like us. We give that something the name consciousness. It doesn't make much sense to deny that it is there. Denying consciousness because it doesn't fit well into our ontology derived from science is to elevate science to unreasonable heights. Science is great, but it's subject matter is inferred (the external world). It doesn't have the power to undermine non-inferred knowledge.
And he explains a bit how he changed and evolved the character and in fact the entire race of Ferengis.
How do you do it?

I used to do this too, with automatic software on my Android phone. I stopped when I switched to iPhone because I couldn’t find anything to do it. Android has been hitting these API’s as well.
Similar reason why you can’t have exception types in TypeScript. The underlying runtime and language doesn’t allow it to work.
I think this article is rather lazy.

People travel for all manner of different reasons. You might not, and that’s fine. Nobody needs to change anyone else’s mind. Neither are right or wrong.
hmm, hasn't speech been spoofable before? Is there a major difference between this and video?
I guess the only solution is to message the mods to unflag these posts:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36456034

Something historic is happening right before our eyes, and it doesn't make sense to bury our heads in the sand. Wonder if posts like the outbreak of Covid got flagged too?
There are several aspects to keyboard interfaces that the article does not catch:

- The physical device:
- The "key board": Keys that are aligned in straight lines are not aligned with your hands.
- The wrist bend affects people differently and can cause strains
- Physical design to lower wrist strain is an almost entirely separate research area than optimal keyboard layout.
- The optimal physical input device (in terms of input bandwidth) is hand-shaped but is more difficult to make.

- The layout:
- This article only discusses permutations of letters for increased bandwidth and less strain.
- Considering computer users can "easily" reach 80-120 wpm with QWERTY, speed is a moot point for non-competitioners.
- Few people learn a new layout and have a confirmation bias when they do; real usage data is scarce.

Real-world experience differs slightly; e.g. I have more race conditions on Dvorak than on QWERTY because of left/right-hand speed differences. Dvorak does succeed at distributing consecutive letters between the hands, but I never had problems with accidental twiddles on QWERTY. Would you rather be fast or accurate? For most people, the trade-off is somewhere in the middle.

The layout is about much more than permutations of letters. Anyone who tried to or aspires to run Kmonad, Kanata, or Neo2 or who have a window manager with custom keybindings that control their environment, or who type with more than one kind of keyboard (e.g. pinyin, cyrillic, greek), or who need to type special unicode symbols that don't have a key combo in traditional layouts (math, emoji): The bar for keyboard input is higher, and I don't know any project that attempts to unify these. My "keyboard" is a combination of many open source tools, some of which work better than others, others have a steep learning curve, yet others are only documented in foreign languages.

[0]: https://github.com/kmonad/kmonad
[1]: https://github.com/jtroo/kanata
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo_(keyboard_layout)
[3]: https://www.neo-layout.org/
Embrace, extend, extinguish. Decent article.
I love Voyager. If you want to call it junk food trek sure, but it has some depth as well. The most depth were some of the Dominion DS9 episodes, in my opinion. But overall I still rank TNG the highest, then VOY, followed by DS9. That's my top three. As for 4th, that's something we should discuss over a beer.
Well, every rule and law in existence, that I can think of, has an assumed intent. That's probably a necessary condition for rules, whether it's a sign in the park or a government regulation or anything else.

If people do not have, to some degree at least, a shared intent (e.g. let's have a conversation here about topic X, let's have a park to have fun or relax in, etc.) there is probably no set of rules that can specify sufficiently what can and must not be done. If you did manage to craft such a sufficiently detailed set of rules, it would be too large for people to read and understand.
Cloudquery, Resoto, Steampipe, Airbyte, CloudYali – cloud resource inventory
I've been using the GCC 15 alpha with -std=C++32 options, which has been interesting. All the new borrow checking features and even support for fully dynamically typed programs, but it's the garbage collection that is really an enjoyable step into the future. Also glad to see C++ finally ditch inheritance and go all-in on interfaces and protocols, it's about time.
Most meetings can be done async with a few bullet points. So much time wasted on idle talk that is not productive.

- both a maker and manager
I love corporations overzealously enforcing laws on people through those people's private devices.
So the people making more money because the employees are making less money are happy, and that means the leadership is doing well.

Money means too much to too many people.
Sure, but if you're a creature that's useful to humans, you'll find that you'll either get domesticated and lose all your freedom or get hunted to near (or total) extinction. Any life on earth with some semblance of intelligence is dominated by us. Dolphins, as smart as they are, have no way to use their intelligence to flip the script and become the dominant species, and are dependent on us not deciding that they would be useful to us (beyond the ones we take for aquariums).

The only exceptions I can think of to the above rule are viruses and bacteria, where (in most cases) we can't really exterminate them entirely from the face of the earth even if we wanted to. However, it seems to me that sufficient intelligence would allow for better understanding of different bacterial/viral structures that would allow you to make a specific chemical that would be very good at killing that specific thing.

Overall, the danger from a bootstrapping AI that becomes vastly more intelligent than humans (if possible) seems to me to be that we would lose full agency according to its whims as it gets more and more power.
Typescript can check sprintf though using template string types: https://www.hacklewayne.com/a-truly-strongly-typed-printf-in...
If you have documentation of that, you might enjoy suing th om small claims court.
Won't encrypting defeat the ordering though, reintroducing the performance penalties?
In the Netherlands, when riding a bicycle, most people treat most traffic rules as suggestions. Interesting context to explain what's happening.

This is made possible by the fact that cars (try to) follow traffic rules to the letter.

(Essentially every car driver in the Netherlands is also a cyclist at other times)
Standard caveat of using a nonstandard layout is likely to break shortcuts in the OS and programs, be a hassle for games, and cause trouble when using common computers.

Also loving the "QUERTY" is suboptimal; use "DVORAK". "DVORAK" is suboptimal, use "COLMAK". "COLMAK" is suboptimal, use "COLMAK_DH". Can't win!
A strongly-typed printf in TypeScript
In NYC, jaywalking is normal. In Santa Monica, you get a ticket.

In some American cities (Chicago), crossing against the light is how muggers and pickpockets tell the tourists apart from the locals.

People who live in downtown Chicago wait for the light because they know that there's very often a car ready to make a left turn right into the crosswalk. Tourists are often from places where, if there is a crosswalk, there's no traffic to worry about.
Show HN: Bruijn – Programming language based on pure lambda calculus
That's the explanation they came up with for why they were lying, but these people are self-admitted liars so why would you believe their lies any further?

If you are in charge of government and worried about mask availability, the right thing to do is pass laws seizing mask supplies. This is easy because they were almost all being imported from China anyway.

The worst possible thing to do would be to assert with 100% confidence that for scientific reasons masks don't work to the entire population including healthcare workers, and then later invert your position over night. Anyone who thinks this is a reasonable way to manage material logistics is clearly far too stupid to be in charge of anything, let alone critical government functions.
As a graduate of starfleet academy, he knows many things. Of course he was there when first contact was made with the Ferengi in TNG season 1, and he had already completed his classes then, so not sure he actually learned the Ferengi rules at school. But I guess we will allow some continuity errors, esp if it might just be a joke on Worfs part.
Yes, I agree, especially considering the distro :)
I don't tend to follow them either, but I've been frustrated by the lack of progress on allocator_api, and I came across this yesterday after looking into that. I only mention it because the Handle stuff in there looked tangentially related, though it's talking about something quite a bit different than you were.
This paper asks the wrong questions. Yes, a fertizilized egg is "alive" in the same way sperm is "alive". The paper essentially uses the question of when the development of a human begins to argue:

1. Anything living is wrong to kill.
2. Human embryos and early fetuses are living
3. Therefore, human embryos shouldn't be "killed"

#1 is clearly wrong, #2 is a misdirect, #3 leads to the author's desired conclusion as a result. That paper based on the presumption that "opponents" argue that fetuses are not biologically living organisms. Fertilized eggs and embryos are living human organisms certainly, but it's not a person yet. Is an egg a chicken? Is a seed a tree? Is a caterpillar a butterfly? Is a collection of human cells with the potential to become a human, human? I believe "no" to all of the above. Potential for development into a more complex living organism is not the same as being that other organism.
The placement of punctuation is the reason I believe Dvorak is better than most other optimized layouts. They may be optimal for their metrics, but their metrics are bad.

I have been thinking about trying a one-handed layout lately, the one you link is intriguing!
The other danger is that it's simply used as evidence against you. I'd surprised if there's any jurisdiction in the world where you can live a normal life without breaking any laws.
Well, records can be deleted
Google because it sounds like music to my ears. Or yahoo. Or airbee-n-bee.
I did have some Gantt charts in my history book back when I was at school (never knew the name), and yes it's so much more clear than recreating the same thing in your head based on dates.
> an even stronger copyleft than the agpl

Which is a red flag. The AGPL was basically designed to be the strongest possible copyleft FOSS license. When people try to make even stronger ones, they usually end up making something that's neither free nor open source (e.g., the SSPL), and that's exactly what ended up happening here.
Same for every app there, but few are $25. I've published an app there before and didn't price it that way.
Not every version of Janeway's ship and crew made it. We followed the path/timeline of the successful one. For instance, Harry and Naomi Wildman's voyager was destroyed. There was also the year of hell, etc.
And now I’d say you’ve rediscovered part of the authors intent.

Shared intent, across cross border platforms, is awfully hard if not impossible to achieve with anything approaching consistency.
“When has justice ever been as simple as a rule book?“
Probably referring to Quizlet and Memrise, and the up-and-coming iDoRecall.com
None of these people made their money on their own account, it was always at the very least with Putin's blessing, and kickbacks, but much of it entirely on putins's account - ie many of these russian billionaire oligarchs are essentially putin's senior managers.
I've never been convinced by the home row argument. I type by using key combos, so what matters to me is that common letter sequences can easily be pressed with two separate fingers without effort. For example, English has a lot of words starting with consonant+R+vowel, such as the word "crash". That's a particularly bad word for me to type on qwerty, because I have to stretch one finger down and one finger up then roll by hand upward. To make matters worse, my pinkies are not particularly strong, so I tend to use my ring finger to press the A. I wish there were a less commonly used letter in that home row position.

Colemak looks slightly better than qwerty for some key combos, but not better enough to switch. If there were a layout that optimized typing of common letter sequences, I might be tempted to try it.
.. but an accurate product description
In the keyboard event example of only specifying the properties you want to test against, it would be better to use `Pick` to create a relational type off the original. That way if the property or types change (unlikely in this case), your type system will remain up-to-date.
This is from 2014 (it felt awfully familiar when it got to the code samples) but submitted under the title "Semantic Compression" or other variations:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17090319 - May 17, 2018 (41 comments)

There are others with 1-2 comments but no other discussions beyond that that I can find.
Regardless of the domain, questions of strength of evidence and strength of conclusions that can be drawn are of general interest to many.
I don't think the sci-fi looking part is helping that though.
The article suggests that makers tend to take on ambitious projects that take large blocks of time to complete. This is objectively true; even today. Most of what is built is ambitious or takes large chunks of time.

Editing some text or repositioning a button or something trivial is 30-min and does not require thought, but most everything is not this. Most everything involves large chunks of time and interrupting this chunk is certainly a disaster.
You're arguing against a straw man, like so many conservatives, who think people like me view abortion as skin tag removal. It is a major healthcare decision, it has major consequences, it's not trivial. Be appalled at thine own reckless interpretations.
This is a very underappreciated perspective, but with any significant period of isolation conbined with effective meditation will likely point you in this direction. Plant medicines can accelerate the path to that experience. And for me it brought incredible peace. Perhaps its ignorance, perhaps I'm wrong, but it feels as real as the love of my children.
It's almost starting to look like the way to make progress is not to stick electrodes into biological systems and measure a few dozen neurons to try and reverse engineer biological consciousness.

Might actually be easier to create artificial consciousness such that we can actually measure and more closely study what is happening.

The biological approach is fiendishly difficult. If we can barely understand how an LLVM is working, what chance do we have of trying to understand one by only looking at the raw electrical output few dozen transistors from a machine running one.
Well... I was damn happy with 114.0 when it FINALLY introduced Webauthn support on Linux and Mac. That was a really long wait.

Some features really are worth it.

The problem is more that they prioritise the glossy fluff ones. Like time-limited "inspirational" colour schemes.
Hmm - I've rarely used prebuilt decks but maybe I should consider that. Other services besides Anki have them as well. iDoRecall has a bunch that are tied in with OpenStax (a "free e-textbooks for all" project).
> Speeding is mostly enforced everywhere.

MA highways are moving 75-80mph when traffic permits, regardless of whether they have a posted 55 or 65mph speed limit. NH is only a few mph less typically.
Well the Ferengi were a largely unknown race when first encountered in TNG, beyond the fact they were hyperlibertarians they didn't bother elaborating. They were the portrayed as an annoyance more than anything serious to worry about. DS9 was the first series to really build on it, and they recycled a lot of old rejected b plots from TNG in the first couple of seasons so there was a lot of filler dialog which became canon.
Pi.ai LLM Outperforms Palm/GPT3.5