skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This pattern would be better if it "just worked". Many times if you make an account it drops you off somewhere else.

I made the account to look at a specific piece of content. Show me that content!!!
Forcing you to download the app for any sub marked NSFW, whereas you previously only had to click to confirm your age, is bullshit.

I'm well aware that the reason you want me to download your app has nothing at all to do with the reason you're claiming, and as a user it just pisses me off.
Ah, the old "any imperfect solution is totally useless" position.

I already have to educate and then console when they fall for email or SMS scams. Are you really saying that means I have to accept a new vector from scam stores that impersonate the Apple app store and just charge $100 for "Free" apps?

This regulation will be good for techies AND good for fraudsters. We don't have to pretend there is no downside.
I haven't played it, but Genshin Impact is often compared to Breath of the Wild.
To be sure, the seq2seq style already allowed multi length embeddings before transformers were a thing. RNN vs Transformer is entirely an implementation choice; you can build a seq2seq model with any combination of transformer, RNN, and conventional layers.

Each of these layer types have different computational costs for training and inference, and encode different inductive biases, which may be more or less appropriate to a given problem.
Ministry of Hajj and Umrah (Saudi Arabia)
The downvoting without any context or feedback as to why is so predictable on any post that’s remotely positive about Tesla on HN :)
>I have to admit that the claim is more for marketing purpose to make it look impressive.

If you are going to be honest about lying by admitting to us that you lied, just state that it was a lie, don't euphemize it as marketing. Otherwise the "honesty" just comes of as manipulation.
Or eating a hot dog.

Honestly, there's so much porn being dumped on the internet every day if you'd avoid drawing attention to it and quietly torpedo it via DMCA, yours would quietly disappear. But you could also write an article about it in a major paper and ensure it never goes away, and people get pissed at you and make more.

Give it another year or two for TTS to become commodity and she'll have way worse problems (like identity theft, and bomb threats made in her voice, spoofed from her number) to worry about.
I don't suppose anyone made a Google Colab version already?

Actually I found a HuggingFace demo here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/fffiloni/DragGAN
Pretty firmly with you on this one and not with the detractors.

Ultimately, engineers are solving business problems, working with other departments and untangling technical ideas.

Often they need to explain those ideas to non-technical folks, and just as often, they need to justify their decisions to technical and non-technical colleagues.

In every area and task having solid writing skills including documentation, emails, and putting together reports, is extremely important.

Frankly if engineers lack the care and attention to detail to put together a decent resume that's a pretty strong signal their other writing is probably sloppy as well.

To the detractors: writing code is the easiest part of the job, figuring out what code to write to solve the right business problem in concert with other areas is what is important. I do not care if you are a wiz kid mega coder, if your writing is sloppy it casts doubt on everything you _are_ trying to say.
I think you're wrong on both counts. The first example is closer to direct than passive. Passive-Aggressiveness would be saying yes, but intentionally doing a poor job without communicating.
His second example was letting someone borrow his car when he couldn't drive them. I can't drive you, but you can borrow my car. I will make sure to get you the keys. Doesn't seem assholish to me.
What is preventing a class action for frivolous DMCA notices?
You'll also filter a bunch of people who respect their time enough to say "fuck that lmao"

You can probably get away with it you're the only place hiring
She may be a horrible person due to her actions and choices she made. And damn straight I'll judge someone on their actions.

But if you look, the deepfake porn scene is to pornify women's pictures. If you look for the similar for men, it's just not there.

You can be against this lady, but also be against deepfake porn targeting women only at the same time.
Thank you for this great feedback. I agree with this 100% and I personally use github link in my resume instead of linkedin link. Currently, it shows a GitHub logo if you pass in a github link, e.g. github.com/eikenberry. I just create an issue to keep track of this on how to make it more noticeable: https://github.com/xitanggg/open-resume/issues/6
> ssh login, fail2ban, opened ports, unprivileged user

All of these things are extremely trivial to configure.

> Would you feel more or less confortable taking vacations while having a server or a server less platform?

Depends on the SLA of my provider. Most VPS providers have 3+9s these days, then the reliability concern becomes my code, same with serverless.

> Would you feel more or less confortable undergoing a security assessment while using a server or a server less platform?

It is a common misconception that serverless platforms are inherently more secure. In reality, they just have different security concerns. In my eyes, it takes a practitioner of equivalent skill to properly harden a fleet of servers Vs correctly handle the eccentricities of IAM et al in a large cloud app.
Typically, I just use it to see if my name appeared in news somewhere. I don't get quoted that frequently these days but it's something I like to keep my eye on.
from the perspective of someone who spends 100x more time trying to compile other people’s software than writing my own build scripts, they don’t really feel that different. CMake seems to offer more features/builtins, but without doing much to actually tame complexity. which isn’t necessarily a good thing because then the people who think it’s a good idea to shove complexity into their build system just do more of that and i have to read 10x more build scripts to coerce the thing into doing what i want (e.g. getting it to cross compile).
Yeah, I'm surprised he didn't try attaching some actual drone propellers to see how much thrust they'd give. There's no shortage of small plastic props available for 'Tiny Whoop' style micro-quadcopters, with 2-5 blades and in various small sizes.
> About 80% of these are pretty cowardly and the others overly verbose. Saying “sure I’ll meet you later this year” is not saying no.

Only if you really mean "no" but are lying and saying that to be polite. Most of these aren't really about how to phrase "no", but how to think about prioritization and scheduling and in many cases "yes, but" or "no, but" are more appropriate than unconditional yes or no.
Thanks, much appreciate it.
Not sure what are you trying to say. My point was that a invoking a function that will act on arguments that have been defined away from the callsite is not a OO specific feature.
Apologies if it came this way, I didn't point out (or wanted to) if they are wrong or not, I just wanted to expose some flaimbait and sophisms used to defend neo-nazi groups.

I felt like using sophisms to defend neo-nazis wasn't in the spirit of HN, I come here for the intellectual curiosity and productive messages.
> Why are timestamps increasingly being replaced by vaguely worded junk?

I don't know but it's clearly part of the general trend for everything to get worse. Fortunately, many of the web sites that show the time as vaguely worded junk will also show a more precise indication if you mouse-over. So I think the end of the world is still a few years off.
All of the current large US social media sites would be perfect if ran similarly to wikipedia, moreso the transparency and openness rather than the non-profit corporate model (but that certainly wouldn't hurt anything).
I have trouble imagining a reasonable person being interested in porn containing a minor government official, let alone being confused as to its authenticity. I can't even see reasonable people being interested in genuine celebrity sex tapes.

The audience for that seems limited to malicious weirdos who already have zero respect for the victim. Any influence it might have on their opinions seems irrelevant.

Of course, this has no bearing on the personal violation one feels when exposed to this sort of abuse. But for deepfake porn to somehow influence public perception is hard for me to grasp. Are there any examples of real reputational damage stemming from this?
There is just enormous variability with professors. The more MOOCs you take the more obvious this becomes.

If you had good professors in college you should consider yourself lucky.

There is a lot of absolutely terrible professors.
Word of mouth is the best way I've found, honestly.

I'll shill for OrnaRPG. Its a gps linked game ala PokemonGo, but you pick a class and level up by fighting slimes, elves, golems, thieves, and whatever else you come across on your wanderings. In classic sprite graphics. Think old school FF or DQ.

As you level more class options become available. You're never locked down a given path, you can freely changes classes whenever you want. The world has zones you can take and hold for income (often held by level 200+ folks who play too much, unless you happen to be more rural), you can build a village with different structures in it providing different services, otherwise you have to walk about and find e.g. a blacksmith.

Microtransactions primarily are skins to change the spire of your character, or buy the dev a coffee. There are one or two packs of potions you can buy if you get stuck, but IIRC they are limited to being bought once.
Yeah it's just a big database in what 4-5 files? My first computer was a Win 3.11 box so I have experienced a world of app specific config files and the registry was a good alternative. In the early days it seemed to give you some trouble, or rather if you were having trouble you could potentially fix it by going into the registry. But now I can't remember the last time I needed to go into the registry for anything important. Maybe do a Google search or go onto YouTube as I recall seeing something from one of the original designers a few years ago that explained what they were trying to accomplish.
The size of most electric motors is proportional to the torque they produce - so if you can spin it faster, you can get more power for the same weight. There are some other factors that make high speed worse - for example, bearing and core losses. The PCB motor is a coreless motor though, so it has no core loss, biasing it even harder towards high speed operation.

Propellers generally get less efficient with higher speeds though, which might be a bigger factor than any of this.
It’s not the screen there were plenty of great games for the gba gbc and DS all had tiny screens
SQLite Journal Modes [video]
Fetchyboy
You're right, these cases could all be suicides. But somehow I doubt it.
> And it's never complete.

Nothing ever is. But it doesn't need to be.

> The problem with reverse engineering is that it's a minefield for the business entity, from all viewpoints

I don't buy this; RE is a gross exaggeration of what's actually going on. They don't even need to go through the trouble of reverse-engineering for the most common XMP file functionalities people actually want. The XMP file is just a list of operations. It's right there in XML, already human-readable in English. The cases most people care about are astonishingly simple. Like "+25 contrast", "+2 exposure", "-50 highlights". Surely the app can at least alter brightness and contrast... just read the darn file and apply the straightforward stuff as if the user applied them manually! And if users re-adjust the settings, just update these back in the file like Photoshop would. If they see a random transformation they can't replicate adequately, they can just warn the user. It's not even hard to handle the easy pieces, let alone requiring reverse engineering! You won't get a bit-for-bit pixel-perfect repro, but who cares? It's not like they have to change the heart of that one random user who used XMP files to transform their penguin into a gorilla that they hashed on the blockchain to get the 90%+ of the other holdouts to jump ship!
This is why we have keyservers.
To all the people with a problem with the 3rd question on Soul.

The point is, that many religions, and many people, do believe in a soul, or form of dualism, some form of immaterial soul. Thus the question is to tease out your stance, to make people think through some of the issues with their own beliefs.

Since it is impossible to define a single form of the immaterial soul, since there are a million interpretations, they provided a very generic simple model to base the question.

Who cares if it was new information, at the very start they said each question did NOT depend on the others, and would provide information for that question, that applies to that unique and generic hypothetic situation.

It would be pointless to have a questionnaire like this, but the first question be "if you don't believe in a soul, don't take the quiz, this isn't a safe space for the scientist."

The discussion of soul's and the possible interactions between material and immaterial go back 1000's of years, and not all from the religious. Early scientist spent a lot of time trying to reconcile science and soul, back to early scientist like Newton, Leibniz, Descartes. Even, does a soul have mass, with experiments on weighing a live body and dead body. It is a long standing question, and one that most people do not think is solved, hence still worth asking.

So, a lot of people believe in souls, there is hundreds of years of Scientist, Philosophers and Theologians trying to define and reconcile those views. But what? You, in particular, think it is all solved and wrapped up so it is a stupid question?

Note. I don't believe in the immaterial soul, but to discount a philosophical survey because it mentions it, is pretty bogus reason to discount that line of thought.

These are all very valid questions in the latest craze of AI. I wouldn't doubt that at some point soon, there would be some religious type protest when someone's loved one is 'mimicked' by an AI bot and then the rest of the congregation calls it a demon, or possesedd, or that it has trapped the persons soul.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 has a replaceable battery and was waterproof, so they are not mutually exclusive options.
I fuckin love Miles Davis!
I would say start getting deep into Figma. Watch their tutorials and some of the keynotes and you’ll not only learn the important parts of theory, you’ll learn what people do in practice.

I would think that spending time watching videos and playing with Figma would be infinitely more valuable than reading a book. Not only that, it’s funner. Read the book afterwards because by then you’ll have questions in your mind and books can help to fill those holes.

Also, Figma is completely free for students and teachers.
It could also result in many fewer ingestions overall.
> A Flexible, Uniform Data Model for Authorization

Are there good examples of similar applications of data modules for similarly niche use cases? I get that there are obviously endless data models, but this seems to extend beyond that into a more integrated concept and I don’t quite know why that seems to be the case.
…at companies demanding WFO. I just got a promotion at my all remote company. We have two offices that people are free to work from, but people only do occasionally or when they need to meet clients etc who are in town.
I'd argue that it's not obvious in it's absence, see: the philosophical zombie thought experiment

The secret is that we are all philosophical zombies to begin with.
I hate this so much. I don't want a Facebook account but there are several accounts on Instagram that post things I'd like to view.

There's some kind of shady black market for Instagram scrapers that bypass the hard wall the OP describes and publish the content with their own ads injected. I can't vouch for anything about these sites other than the fact that they do work. I highly recommend using noscript or ublock at the very least before checking them out.

https://imgsed.com/

https://dumpoir.com/

https://wizstat.com/

There are likely others, these are just the ones I'm personally aware of.
Miles Davis is the personification of the term "cool"
Create and Hydrate HTML with HTM
I think my point is, maybe there's no such thing as continuity of experience (since we sleep every day) and consciousness itself may be an illusion. With an instant replacement, and also with a large distances, it makes it clear this is not me any longer, but if I replace my neurons gradually with digital components it's essentially equivalent to what is already happening with my brain cells, so it doesn't break the illusion. My identity and consciousness is an illusion and I just don't want to break it. I know that is contradictory and makes no sense, but that's the reason I would not use the transporter.
Shouldn't have to in what sense? Someone claiming/implying it's you? That's already considered libel. Someone's machine assisted fantasy that looks kind of like you? Tough luck, people are allowed to imagine things you would rather they not imagine. If you have not been posting your real naked photos online, fake ones will not depict your private parts accurately anyway.
I'm sorry, but I don't see how that's an accurate representation of what you did in this thread. You attacked the other user badly, in violation of HN guidelines like "assume good faith", and accused them of doing a bunch of things that (at least from what I saw) they hadn't done. That's not cool.

I know that with a topic this provocative it's difficult to read other people correctly, but the site guidelines provide explicit guidance about that too:

"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
> You can get high quality stuff out of China

Of course. For example, all iPhones are made in China.
20 limit Usally.
Not particularly keen on the way you said it, but I'm basically 100% on board with the spirit of what you're saying.
"F1 Rfid Hash Programmer" Sounds like a really fun job title
EVs should absolutely be required to use standardised and replaceable battery modules. (Replaceable by any competent mechanic, at least). Although theft would become a concern, when the battery pack makes up over half of the value of any EV.

But it's amazing how many people are so quick to essentially say 'F the planet, I don't mind buying a new phone every 2 years, and I really don't want my next iPhone to be 2mm fatter!'.
The best realistic outcome is that the technology becomes convenient and ubiquitous enough that people's default reaction is to distrust it. Suppressing the technology only makes it more likely that people will trust it, which increases the total harm of it.
I didn't know that, I only use android so I did not notice you had another app on iOS. Maybe the one I tried was called AnkiDroid then? I can't remember.

I'm using a completely non-Anki based flashcard app just because of the lack of this feature.
Sometimes if you mouseover the vague time stamp you’ll get an ISO time stamp pop up. Doesn’t help if you’re on your phone, of course.

I gotta say though, personally I can never remember what day of the month it is, so having it say “X days ago” is a big help to me.
It’s an interesting claim - out of interest I looked up how many countries actually use a resume over a CV and some sources say only United States, Australia, and Canada.
Companies That Replace People with AI Will Get Left Behind
What games have you developed? Genuinely interested!
Instagram requiring to register is such trash.
This sounds like "compliance" attorneys gone crazy. It's appalling, but does check out with the bureaucratic cancer eating our society. Waitstaff or the cashier reading menu options sounds like wonderful accommodation. Certainly much more so than impersonally telling a customer to solve their own problem by turning their dining session into a web browsing session.
Yes. The fact that there are _two_ top-down swipes on the home screen that start within half an inch of each other is nutty.

One of those swipes (notifications) fights with every other top-down swipe in an app _and_ the window-dragging swipe in Stage Manager, which only works on the three dots.

I find these frustrating and I have no co-ordination issues.
By virtue of appearing to be a photograph. The medium itself is a message (cf. Marshall McLuhan). An image which appears to be a photograph conveys a meaning to the viewer that "this depicts a real event", whereas if I draw a picture, even if it is of something plausible but which as never happened, there isn't a perception that the image is being presented as evidence of an event which has taken place. If we know that enough people will draw such an inference from a statement, it can and should be treated as potentially libelous.
> not a single comic (at least the ones written before the Marvel movies began dominating the culture) is about superheroes

I would argue that Rork - one of my favorite Franco-Belgian comic characters - counts as one. He would not feel very out of place at DC's Vertigo as Constantine's colleague of sorts.

And then there are Asterix and his friend Obelix, who having access to powers unavailable to regular humans, go around solving problems by punching people particularly hard - just like a regular Marvel/DC character would. ;)
That's a very different argument to the app store not allowing side loading though.
What is that reason? (someone driving metrics to get a promotion?)
You can basically do anything you want as a large corporation when it comes to this stuff. The law doesn't have any teeth, as a smaller player you can't do anything about bogus DMCA notices or legal violations.

Many services like Twitter or Chrome Web Store will at best put your content back up a few weeks (or months) later after you file a counter-notice; in some cases they will just nuke your account after a few notices even if the notices were bogus.
> If someone were to draw a watercolor painting of a likeness of a President one doesn't like having sex with an equally despised congresswoman, most would agree that this is a classic "free speech issue" and is the very sort of protected speech that first ammendment clearly protects.

You would be wrong; there are many legal issues which can protect identifiable people from having their likeness used, especially if it is (1) without consent and (2) in a "private place" (or depicted in an intimate/private situation).

The person whose likeness is used would very much have recourse to sue, whether it's the painter of a watercolor or someone who generates a deepfake. The same principles apply.