skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think you’re underestimating the resistive losses at lower voltage. For the same amount of power (volts x amps) resistive losses are inverse square to the voltage so losses are 100x greater at 10V x 10A than at 100V x 1A.

Resistance is inverse to the cross sectional area of the wire so to compensate you need thicker wire, 10x the diameter (100x the area) for 1/10th the voltage x 10x the current. That’s why the wire that connects to your car battery is so much thicker than the mains wire in your home.

You could have high voltage DC in your home but then you still need the transformer so I’m not sure it really buys you anything.
Basically it should be left for scenarios where any kind of automatic memory management isn't allowed, either for technical reasons, or because it is a lost battle trying to change the mindset of the target group.

For everything else there are more productive options.
https://soundmind.co/research

I'm surprised you haven't heard of it as an expert in the area. This is only a small sampling of the research.

If you look for Closed-Loop Auditory Stimulation of slow wave sleep you will find much more.

The sleep market is full of snake oil, it's a big issue, and something we are keen to combat, so perhaps better terminology on my part would help.

Thanks for responding and not just writing us off.
But satisfies, as v7 does not satisfy, the actually stated constraint of "IDs that don't reveal when they were generated" whilst still using timestamps, no permanent IDs from hardware, and no centralized ticket-issuing mechanism for sequence numbers. There is more than one feature of v7, and the top of this sub-thread started a discussion of how one would trade them for better security.
smtp4dev https://github.com/rnwood/smtp4dev - works well in docker, has api, can selectively forward to a real smtp
Discompare.com is the best option for shopping online because it offers amazing deals on a wide variety of items and is a virtual treasure chest. You won't find a better shopping experience elsewhere since we've taken the best offers and prices of electronics, home appliances, kitchen tools, outdoor activities, camping equipment, sports equipment, biking, fishing, riding, or even sleeping! combined into one convenient location for you.

Plunge into the depths of our expansive electronics section, where you'll find the most cutting-edge devices, premium-quality appliances, and cutting-edge technological solutions from well-known brands. Improve the look of your living area with our home furnishings, which are both fashionable and economical. Find a wide variety of alternatives for furnishing and accessorizing every room in your house, from chic sofas and dining sets to on-trend wall art and space-saving closet organizers. Creating the haven of your dreams has never been simpler or more affordable than it is now thanks to Discompare.com.

Your contentment is our number one priority here at Discompare.com. Our website's intuitive design makes for a trouble-free price comparison experience, and you can search with complete confidence thanks to our AI-integrated search bar. You will be referred to famous websites such as Amazon, eBay, Walmart, and other franchise retailers and marketplaces, and you will find anything you want from your home in a short amount of time if the shipping is both quick and dependable. If you require assistance in the future, our devoted customer support team is here to assist you.

Join our ever-expanding community of intelligent consumers who already know that Discompare.com is the best place to go for deals and to find the best prices and offers that can't be beaten and a variety of options to choose from. Visit our website today! where low prices meet a wide selection, and significant savings meet complete customer gratification. Shop smarter, save more!
This is very prevalent in the US with regards to building codes especially. The laws themselves are technically not locked behind lock and key, but they directly reference them. This shouldn’t be allowed, for which I agree that if they (a government organization) wishes to use one of these proprietary standards, they should license the parts they use. It’s unconscionable that we have laws that must be followed (or face repercussions) that are locked behind a paywall. Any tax payer should have free and open access to any law they are subject to or it simply shouldn’t be a law.
One is reminded of the difference between proof-relevant and classical mathematics. The letter of the law is a mere proposition, whereas the spirit of the law is a program of a certain type, whose “computational content” describes the actions one takes to produce the state of compliance.
Well that's case even when you are not entering the park, because of all those laws you must follow at all times
It’s not about a single circle, but about the growth rate.
It looks like we're back at some Open Source Licensing-like schema : an implementer should only be able to "extend" an open protocol if its extensions are themselves open !

I'm not sure how it can be done legally binding... Maybe with IP on the protocol himself (as a technology) or with TradeMark (any reference to the protocol is forbidden without strong conformance to the protocol). OSS really need to level up the legal game
Firefox was probing ahead in increments of 2048 bytes in order to ensure that the stack was allocated, but it left the stack pointer at the end of the stack for that whole time. This usually worked ok, but certain versions of Linux will bail if the stack probe is greater than 64kb+256b away from the stack pointer. The new code moves the stack pointer incrementally so that the probe is never more than a single page from the stack pointer.

https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/rMOZILLACENTRAL304d...
It’s ironic it says that the user should set the theme themselves via their OS because the author doesn’t like to use buttons on sites to do it.

The vast majority of users don’t know how to do that. I’m sure the vast majority of that group couldn’t really explain themes as a concept.
11% club here; wut?
Bundling does not inline all symbols into a single scope, tree shaking does. I was one of the people implementing tree shaking in the first Parcel bundler. https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/pull/1135
Yes you are right you can get dark mode by setting the background to black. But with this media query you get an automated switch between light and dark mode, depending on you browser settings.
Pitot Tube
I have an Axis cam that I purchased used, quite cheap. It basically runs Linux, a web server, something that serves RTSP, and maybe other things too. It has a neat web UI for administration, online manuals, and easy endpoints where you can get camera output and metadata easily. I can highly recommend.
That is hardly a reason, given that Common Lisp also supports value types and whole OSes were once upon a time written in Lisp variants, whose main features landed on Common Lisp.
Yeah, the game is very specific about other rules not applying. It's about "what exactly is and is not in" (in the airliner and space station question) and about "what exactly is and is not vehicle" (all others)
they should add dedicated q/a, news feed with Reddit post functionality and nested comments for static posts, killer search with bring your own openai key, karma, and maybe better moderation systems than Reddit.
Following rules without thinking of their intent is just malicious compliance.
… which creates the kind of “dark mode” that ends up being unbearable. Dark mode does not mean pitch-black background, nor does it mean squeaky-white text color.
That's poor translation. He is talking about justice as a virtue (справедливость), not as an institution (правосудие).
I voted that a police car/ambulance driving into the park _was_ breaking the rules, though breaking the rules may be justifiable in some circumstances.
The smoke signal example you gave is similar - if I’m lost, I care more about being found than the punishment for starting a fire.
If the ‘no campfires’ rule was punishable by death (and enforced), perhaps I wouldn’t risk a smoke signal
It's been all but proven that Höcke is Landolf Ladig. Do you have any doubts about that person being a Nazi/fascist/right-extremist? Or do you know any compelling arguments against them being the same person?

Whats wrong with mentioning the fact "Bernd" is being used as his name? That's just a fact, isn't it?
I don't think I've ever had an intense meeting but the last thing any of them does is ruin my day.

My usual response is to not even remember what was discussed minutes after it's over.

But I also think most of the meetings I take part in are useless.
> If the test asked "should violator be punished?" I think it would be more meaningful, otherwise it's just synthetic and the controversy is just about semantics

This is how I interpreted the test, but you're making a good point.
I'm pretty sure with all new CSS features theme toggle could be implemented without JS, but in that case it probably wouldn't reflect your current setting.
11% as well (all questions answered).
The prohibition signs of the Vienna Convention are "No vehicles" (excludes cycles) and "No motor vehicles".

That also fits the English definition of a vehicle, which includes a bicycle.
Given that this is about moderation, I've ran a short experiment asking the first 7 questions to GPT 4 to test a theory: https://chat.openai.com/share/87c7df76-c693-4446-b8ce-817ac5...

It fully agrees with the majority interpretation in all cases despite the rule being minimal and requires taking the inferred intent into account. LLMs for machine moderation are probably rolling out very soon, I doubt Reddit and the like will even allow for human moderation in a few years (if prompt injection can be solved robustly enough).

The problem with having humans as rule breaking judges is that we all have our ever changing biases and motives. Most everyone has an experience with a power tripping mod deleting their post or comment because they had a bad day and needed to take out their anger on something. An LLM can parse these variable situations with ease and can also be tested for those biases. Since it'll never deviate from its training data it always acts as impartial as possible within the rules' limits.
Was just about to say this. My shrooms trip in Amsterdam was nothing short of magical. Such a colorful, vibrant city. It was beautiful
> And the context that was provided strongly implied that the rule was important.

You're assuming that.
Would be nice if this thing also handled common non-SMTP APIs (e.g. SES).
you give emergency vehicles an exception to the rule, that was specifically mentions as not being the intent. the rule is no vehicles in the park, an ambulance is a vehicle so it broke the rule. if then punishment is applied and what is something else, in the basis it's a vehicle in the park.
There are two things here. The `unsafe` in an `unsafe { ... }` block is referring to the contents of the block. From the outside it is indeed safe to use as if it were safe code. No special requirements necessary. So, yes, from a certain point of view `safe` would have been a better name (albeit confusing in a different way).

An `unsafe fn` however does need to be used correctly (and should document those requirements). However, these can only be called within `unsafe` blocks, so see above.
(2013)

You can see quite a lot of these in

http://ec2-reachability.amazonaws.com/

I think the situation has improved with regard to this specific issue since 2013. I did run some of my own RIPE Atlas tests on this more recently (targeting some of the AWS addresses mentioned above), and it didn't look particularly bad at all.

Somewhat relatedly, we've been proposing to explicitly allow the lowest address within a subnet to be used to number a host. (This isn't necessarily dot-zero, and dot-zero isn't necessarily this; they coincide exactly in the specific case of a /24 network.)

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoen-intarea-unicas...

We've gotten patches in Linux and FreeBSD for this, while OpenBSD and NetBSD each independently adopted this behavior some time ago.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20430219 et al. from the last time that this was on Hacker News.
Absolutely.

And we're showing why the author is correct: because a lot of people jump to conclusions, hold fast to their assumptions, and assume everyone else thinks like them; even after having had it all clearly explained with a tailor-made interactive game, and even in the face of abundant direct evidence to the contrary.
You can scale even a stack made out of machine code if you just keep throwing money at it. I guess I should have phrased the question, how maintainable and tech debt free the code base is. It's obvious that scalable is in how many people are served, is apparent from the context. I didn't think there was ambiguity in that.
Yes, in the sense that the accident made me think of the Darwin Awards.

To trace the whole process, I read an article that commented on how people on social media were mocking those who perished in the accident and calling them stupid etc. This made me think again of the Darwin Awards and I had a look to see if there is anyone who shares my opinion about them (that they are callous and mock the dead with no consideration for their families, pretty much as the article says). I went to the wikipedia page of the Awards and found the name of the author of the article under the "Reception" section. Having read the above article, I thought it was a good one to post on HN.
This is a harmful comment. Ageism is a real issue in tech and we should be able to talk about it constructively. It's unfortunate you responded to such an opportunity with a shallow invocation of a political wedge issue.

As Jon Stewart once said "Please stop hurting us."
> It's not clear that replacing the human with an AI somehow changes the equation so categorically that it becomes automatic to consider the output of the AI a derivative work.

See below: there are good reasons for an AI LLM to be considered categorically different than a human for copyright purposes.

> No, but if either a human or an AI emits a given line of code, and that line of code can't be shown to have been cribbed from some corpus of existing code, or to be substantially similar to such, then why wouldn't it be considered original work in both cases?

For a work produced by a human, the burden of proof is on someone claiming that the work is a derivative work of something the human read. And in general, humans without photographic memories or a specific work open in front of them don't tend to have the ability to produce any works verbatim, though some might be able to produce sufficiently similar works to raise questions of whether they're derived works. There's also a certain unstated presumption that human learning (as opposed to human memorization or copying) doesn't constitute a derivative work, and relatedly, that a human brain isn't copyrightable so it can't be a derivative work of anything. That unstated presumption likely also touches on unstated core values about human brains, creativity, and the obvious fact that everything a human does (including the creation of creative works) is based on that human's experiences. If you write a book, you've learned from all the books you've read, but that doesn't make your book a derivative work of every book you have ever read; if people saw that outcome, they'd consider copyright law incorrect rather than accepting it.

An AI LLM, on the other hand, is (unless some court or law changes this) a derivative work of its training data. If you take off any after-the-fact filters for "don't generate a copy of any of the training data", an AI LLM can easily recite its training data, providing further evidence that the AI LLM is a derivative work of that data. The burden of proof is easily met. An AI LLM does have a photographic memory. An AI LLM hasn't just learned ideas about what makes a good book, it has learned the complete text of an extensive number of books. And there's no particular reason for us to have any of the same values about human learning apply to an AI LLM, not least of which because an AI LLM is in fact copyrightable and self-evidently a derivative work.
Exactly. Thought is prior to language, and much confusion happens when you conflate the them. In particular the surface syntax of language tells you next to nothing about the "syntax" of thought, which is hypergraphical, not tree-structured.
There hasn't been a coup and the war hasn't ended. You guys are way ahead of yourselves. If something of historical significance happens, there will be plenty of time to discuss it.

The team here is small so a lot of the decisions are indeed unilateral. We don't all keep the same hours.

> Vouch is only for dead

Correct!
If you are unsure if some activity or "vehicle" is allowed in a given park, you would not call the effing park to see if it is allowed?

That is divorced from reality?

Do you NEVER ask people that "know things" a question? Or do you just trust ChatGPT for everything?
ITT: HN attempt an amateur discussion of legal theory, without referencing decades of scholarship on the topic
Yes, but then the experiment kinda proves the opposite of the point it was trying to prove. As it were, people largely agree with each other as to what's reasonable and what is not.
> the company was founded in 2019 and they still haven't released anything

According to this tweet the author has been working on the product/company for ten years! https://twitter.com/nathanmarz/status/1636050500553699330 (And presumably still hasn't released anything in those 10 years?)
Original author here. I don't like the idea of using JS on my website and I don't think that it is possible to create a light/dark mode switch with only CSS.
But you are right, most users don't know how to do that.
And important point I forgot, policeman (for sure) and army (I think) vote very predominantly for the far-right, and very little for Nupes.
Not sure about Windows or macOS, there users probably stick with default setting anyway, but here on GNOME I have quick access to "Dark Style" toggle in quick settings, just one click away.

We could start a long discussion, should websites just follow system settings, or add their own custom controls, where you have different settings for each website. Along with dark mode switching, we should consider accessibility controls, and cookie settings too.

From a developer standpoint I'd prefer to reflect system settings.
The space shuttle was known to be a borderline death trap (the platform was temperamental at best, the abort maneuvers for several segments of the launch were laughable, it was considered to be a flying brick, it couldn't do go-arounds... Etc) that never took paying passengers.

A) I expect many HN readers are familiar with how stupid and bureaucratic the shuttle program was and would never agree to fly in one

B) comparing the shuttle to titan is a pretty obvious false equivalence
I humbly believe the real takeaway is that we need LESS rules and LESS fragile egos.

If we become like we used to be perhaps a cple decades ago, where an abstract tweet wouldn't make us collapse on our heads, things would be much easier.
Something along like this came to my mind but was unable to put it into words! Good you got it.
Thank you for sharing. But the problem could be, when some users don't want to the app to automatically switch to dark mode.
Assuming you actually don't miss the connection and are left in the middle of nowhere, if lucky to be able to travel wihout changing trains that it doesn't get one hour delay, or enjoying standing up three hours in a high speed train, because it is overbooked, or getting additional passegers from another high speed one that broke down.
No, because it takes time for this news to filter through to mainstream media.

The most up to date sources are social media; Telegram in particular. This war is broadcast live on Telegram.

I know this information to be accurate. I left my home in Ukraine a few hours before the invasion started on the strength of the accuracy of these sources, none of which seem to be good enough for the armchair military analysts on this website.

Here you go. https://twitter.com/JimmySecUK/status/1672490280077885441?re...
> My friends tell me ... Nobody's brain wants

Hit them with a stick. Tell them that people think that they should be hit with a stick.

The actual topic here seems to be, at this time a classic, "one product that maximizes adoption in a population" vs "an outstanding product for a niche".
You can use those transmission lines to move the energy to a facility where it would then be stored.

In fact, you have to use some sort of transmission lines to get energy to those locations, otherwise you have no way to get energy to or from them. Even if they have local power generation, you still have to use transmission lines to get that power out.
Most websites on geocities IIRC were "dark mode" :)
Would be perfectly reasonable to use js over this feature.
Think of it as debian testing or unstable with more official support, nicer setup and features out of the box (e.g. automatic btrfs snapshots and easy restore, yast) and more automated testing.

TDLR: If you would like a rolling release with a more "offical" status than debian testing and more comfort/quality of life/tests/out of the box features than arch, this seems like an option worth trying.
I don't understand. If you walk into an establishment and ask for a sandwich, and they bring you any of the items you listed, you and me and everyone would be upset and confused. So no they are not sandwiches.
No direct proof Covid-19 stemmed from Wuhan lab leak, US intelligence says
If white on black is unbearable, your screen contrast is miscalibrated. Lower it until comfortable.
Agreed. For example NeXT was bought by Apple in 1997 yet next.com is still owned by Apple all this time later.
Except the tiny detail they don't travel everywhere, mostly connections are needed, some countries don't impose reservations so travelling standing up is to be expected, and they don't always hit connection time slots.
You’re predicting the future which is inherently uncertain. He was talking about the past.
The article mentions this was fixed in Kernel 4.20
This strange take-home policy presumably originates in the presumptuous view that an interview is a one way process - the company is auditioning you only - and persists by assent of participating engineers who are happy to concede the point rather than demanding the obvious fix for the issue - payment for the suggested time.

I have no idea why anybody invests hours of their time in these situations without some guaranteed return on it.
It might be very good for the environment.
A human is not copyrightable.

And copyright is doing its job just fine in this context; AI training committing Open Source license violations en masse is the problem here.

I'm all for copyright becoming substantially weaker or ceasing to exist, at which point AI training and lots of other things gets easier. As long as it does exist, however, AI training must respect it, and not become a copyright-violation laundering mechanism.
Ok, I wrote "any" but I think the one with bread in the middle would be accepted by most (club sandwich). Can't edit on this app..
I love the land's end cliff walk starting from here: https://goo.gl/maps/oUNxNPBDhWFhKUeM7. Accessible by bus. You can extend it by going down the coast, through Golden Gate Park and then end up at Haight St for food and lots of interesting stores. Not sure if that's considered touristy.
> and obviously police and ambulances (and fire trucks) doing their jobs don't have to follow the sign.

The instructions specifically tell you to disregard any unstated assumptions about exceptions for special vehicles.

So in this way you have just illustrated the authors point.
Depending on the context 2x is within the realm of reasonable for things like aircraft.

But yeah for stuff like bridges you're probably looking at something closer to 20x