skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> But it is not 'a memory usage pattern not supported by the borrow checker'. You can absolutely write a crate with an API identical to slotmap without using unsafe.

I think that might actually be worse though, performance aside. You're performing memory / object lifetime management but the Rust borrow checker still would have no idea what's going on because now you've tricked it by using indices or an opaque handle instead of references. The program may compile just fine but could have use-after-free bugs.

At least with unsafe there's an explicit acknowledgement that the borrow checker is turned off.
Sure. I'd still notice on $10-15. To use my coffee example, if I go across the street and get a coffee and a baked good it'll be over $10.

My Toast purchases are pretty bimodal. Most of them are either $100+ or less than $20. Sans hyperbole, my point was that I'll notice in one mode but not the other.
E2EE reduces the number of potential third parties, even if not to zero. That's better than nothing.
shouldn’t take more than x hours - if i had a dime for every time i heard that…
Yes. It's increasingly common in big C++ code bases (Unreal for example) to prefer interfaces, templates and composition over inheritance, though it's mostly found in newer code. Unreal is still fairly OOP since it is decades old.

Of course, there is some object-orientedness to it, the author even calls part of his new code "objects". I guess some people would call that OOP, but it's certainly not traditional OOP.

Rust does a really nice job of making that the first obvious thing to reach for (simple structs, traits and generics), and making the slower stuff like dyn traits (v-table indirection) more annoying and less desired. Reducing indirection and abstractions makes it easier to reason about code.
> All the necessary static type analysis will be happening automatically in your brain.

Tell me you’ve never developed large projects on a team without telling me…
Are there any banks where you live that give fixed rate mortgages?

Where I live getting fixed rate loan is in banks propositions but they will never give fixed rate to people.

They will claim that with your income you don’t qualify and you qualify for adjustable rate loan - which is only good for banks when inflation shoots up and previous years we had almost no inflation until it hit 20% out of nowhere. So all of it was calculated by banks and normal people who had it good for last 10-15 years now had to pay up.
And how exactly is this a win for philosophers? I'm not aware of any philosopher having made meaningful strides within the subject either

Seems quite an odd and dismissive thing to say. Pretty much every "stride" within the subject seems to have been made by philosophers.
$900k Median Package for Engineers at OpenAI
I’ll blame CPU makers when you can name one CPU in current use that isn’t bog standard 2’s complement that wraps around by default.

About Zig, you probably meant implementation defined, or at the very worst unspecified. In C standard parlance those aren’t undefined at all. They can’t encrypt your hard drive just because you relied on them. Undefined behaviour however, can. And does, when UB happens to enable an arbitrary code execution vulnerability.
Interestingly we spend much more on military. Most people only quote the discretionary spend as the military budget ($751b in 2022), but if you look at the mandatory spend there's another ~ $250b in 2022. Things like survivor's benefits, VA, and foreign base leases/costs end up in the mandatory budget, which has the effect of both making US social programs seem more expensive, and our military complex cheaper.

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58890

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58889
Snark is against the rules on HN
If someone is putting more than $250k in your bank you would presumably be offering them various value-added investment products to keep them depositing more.
Professional engineering is heavy on licensure requirements and personal responsibility. I'd imagine that professional engineers are likely to use AI to generate scenarios, that they will then evaluate fully before signing off on.
right but maybe it is photonic energy that created a disparity in pressure...
Unless consciousness is a property of matter at a certain point and then its physics that loops back into itself and consciousness is just a physical phenomenon.

Just the same way existence is self-referential.
There's a good argument that it's a hereditary quasi-theocratic monarchy -- a right wing one even -- at this point. Their official ideology doesn't even really pay lip service to Stalinist ideology anymore, it's Juche, which functions more like a religion, or a fascist creed.
Because the restaurant's POS will be Toast and you'll be paying that fee when you check out there in person.
Why deflect here? What is your motivation to discount and argue against using circumstantial evidence to draw a conclusion possibility when neither side of the debate has the definitive evidence that you seek?

Does it somehow bother your politics in some way? Are you just being a contrarian for contrary sake? Your desire for evidential purity in a situation where you are most likely not involved is really strange. I am just interested in why that is. What is motivating you here? Please articulate it.
that's virtually precisely what the article is suggesting
You've missed the point of my comment too. We all agree that the exercise is pedantic by design, and that the goal of the exercise is to show how much variance there is in interpreting them.

The point, that you've missed twice now, is that the results are presented using incorrect language.
> How do all businesses in the world coordinate to raise prices simultaneously?

Because anti-trust is a joke, and most brands are owned by a handful of companies, which are chaired over by even fewer handful of investment firms. We are light-years away from the times when business mostly meant mom-and-pop where large scale coordination was impossible. Hell, big tech companies coordinated no-poaching agreements back in 2005, and you think corporations can't possibly find a way to coordinate price hikes in 2023?
Barter economies never had inflationary periods. Inflation as we see it is in it's major component caused by governments debasing the currency.
are all those things mutually exclusive?
> The Protective Services Officers (cut-rate policemen) that are enforcing these sorts of rules are seldom interested in nuance.

I actually agree here, and I probably should have been more specific with what I said originally. When I said:

> the enforcement of the law will hew to the spirit that the text of the rule is being interpreted to have, by those charged with its enforcement.

What I meant was more that:

> when encountering novel situations that can't be easily interpreted using the text of the rule, the enforcement of the rule will hew to the inferred spirit of the rule, rather than robotically trying to apply some "fallthrough" case of the rule (e.g. by permitting any vehicle not explicitly listed.)

So, bylaw officers won't let you do recumbent-bicycle things if bicycles aren't allowed, because to them, a recumbent bicycle IS-A bicycle, and therefore is covered by the explicit text of the law — even if the spirit of the law would have made an exception for recumbent bicycles had it known. (This is the kind of situation where there's a point to petitioning to get the wording of the bylaw changed — when the "case law" of enforcement can't legitimately override the "legislation" of the rule, because it would seemingly go against the explicit text.)

But bylaw officers will allow a pedestrian scooter, because pedestrian scooters aren't explicitly addressed in the rule; nor do they have an IS-A relationship with anything that is addressed in the rule. So they have to actually use their brains to make a decision. And that decision will use common sense — a sibling comment referred to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mischief_rule, and I think that's exactly the kind of common sense being used — to infer intent.

Or, to put that another way: enforcement won't interpolate the rule by inferring spirit, when making fine-grained distinctions when things "fall between" the lines of text in the rule; it will instead "snap" each case to the nearest explicitly-legislated-for case and then apply the text of the rule. But enforcement will often extrapolate the rule by inferring spirit, when judging situations that fall outside the "explicitly-ruled space" bounded by the explicit cases covered in the text.

(Why? From the perspective of the bylaw-enforcer: CYA. Your boss, or some enforcement auditor, could make a reasonable case that "you made the wrong call" by considering a recumbent bicycle to not be a bicycle, and punish you for it; and almost inevitably, given the way we divide responsibilities in our justice system, that "wrong call" will be "not writing a ticket." But nobody's going to punish you for "making the wrong call" on an entirely-novel case — instead, whatever call you did make will instead just become part of a body of case-law for interpreting the rule in the future.)
I am in Russia currently.
Not Russian but I speak fluent Russian and have acquaintances in affected territories.

Update: 19:28 Moscow time.

- Situation is normal in cities and oblasts: as in, there seem to be no panic but people are definitely reading the news.

- Everyone support the government - although I find Russians to be highly political apathetic (which is one of the major roots of the problems in the country IME). The ones who'd soft corner for Wagner also seem to note that Prigozhin should've picked a better time for this. Wagner posters for recruitment are being removed. In all sense, it has fallen from grace.

- Wagner definitely does not have a high proportion of supporters amongst civilians. Within the army's junior ranks (and in Rosgvardiya) there are people that are more sympathetic to it, hence, why they do not explicitly used force against them.
Rumors here are that this is one of the reasons why Ahmat forces were sent to Rostov.

- Wagner forces themselves seem to have strict instructions not to use show of force against esp. civilians in order to not alienate them.

- I'd take Western-news with some salt as well because this is a good time to mix information-war as well.

- Moscow is on high alert, people aren't suggested to make too many public movements, and Monday is declared holiday for most public institutions. Many dense places (malls etc.) have been evacuated. I believe this is to ensure that civilians are neither impacted nor used as hostages.

- For best/live updates, use Telegram channels (in Russian) or Tass (in Russian, use your BS-sensor accordingly)
I only browse HN on my phone, and don't login to comment / submit URLs. I've bookmarked /newest so I go there straight away and don't have to hunt it down every-time and squint to see it. I would recommend using a desktop workstation for interacting with HN for submitting, commenting, upvoting, etc
I would have said the same with Golang, Java though… not sure I understand considering all the crazy patterns that exist there and the huge mess codebases are due to how namespacing work and other reasons.
The thing that makes this illegitimate is this tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1518623997054918657

Musk and his sycophants have been gaslighting the public for months regarding free speech. We should all be calling them out on it.
Meh. I just type

const realkey = key as any as <type>

And call it a day. I'm 100% certain I've typed fewer characters of that pattern than that blog post.
I think Germany is probably the most impressive one. Lost both World wars, had to deal with the East West unification and is now the biggest economy in Europe which is crazy to think about.
It can also be seen as a form of wealth redistribution. People who have the flexibility to change their prices or wages in sync with inflation won't see its effects as much as those who are either locked into long term obligations or have less economic mobility.
Are .ai TLDs basically just owned by America, or does this still route via London?

I doubt Anguilla itself handles these issues.
requiring leetcode despite 20 years of experience, code samples you can show, and a CS degree you can show, is a red flag to me.
That's what modern Chinese politics expert call "the mandate from the heavens". As long as the average (Han) Chinese gets richer, they won't mind the oppressive regime and the collectivist nature of the CCP (welding doors shut for COVID, workers as replaceable cogs).

But should the prosperity slow or stop, the CCP knows it'll lose the "mandate". That's why the Evergrande collapse was such a big deal [0], and the reason the Yuan will never replace the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. The Chinese regime has to "save face" and show progress at all costs. All while having a negative brain drain, gender imbalance and worsening demography.

[0] https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/24/investing/china-evergrande-gr...
Gell-Man Amnesia
Just strip out the tracking use alicord.
Or for true native speed ripcord
> So what value are you teaching children?

What value are you teaching children by not swearing in front of them? Why is making certain sounds with your mouth immoral? Isn't it just showing your are in-group and well cultured? The jwalking culture in Germany is exactly the same.
Consider the the request sequence you gave
a, a, b, b, c, c, d, d ...
and a cache size of 2, when the first c arrives, the cache is in the following state (left is head and right is the tail, inserted at the head):
b(1) a(1)

and it will trigger an eviction, and requires resetting 2 (or O(m)) objects with the following state changes
b(1) a(1) -> b(1) a(0) -> b(0) a(0) -> c(0) b(0)

the next c will change the bit to 1, and we will have
c(1) b(0),

When d arrives, b will be evicted, and we have
d(0) c(1)

Note that we only check/reset one object this time instead of O(m).

Therefore, in the worst case between each O(m) eviction, you need O(m) requests to set the m objects to "visited", strictly no more than a LRU cache.
I remember some early 20th historian trying to bring an early network/system approach to history. Rather than points on a line, it was about arrows/forces. I ... could never remember that persons name nor how he named his approach.
To get to Mexico you might not see a single US Agent, maybe going to see Mexican agents, who might not even stop you.

First time we drove to Mexico from El Paso, we crossed the boarder "by accident", nobody stopped us. Our expectation was the same as yours, that there should be a checkpoint, where we could get our documents to stay in Mexico for few months. We had to drive in Mexico for an hour to a different boarded, where we could actually get our documents sorted.

Not trying to protect that horrible person, who knows how to order an Uber, somehow learned how to get a gun, but cannot look at the google maps to see if they still on the route.
Honestly, zypper is nowhere as slow as dnf/yum.

It feels like it's a problem with every rpm-based distro, unfortunately
I'm sure news coming from an organization controlled by a foundation whose CEO is a retired US military general is entirely reliable and unbiased, and should be taken at face value without any qualms.
I'm not sure which of you or the comment you replied to is using 'debt holder' correctly. But they meant inflation benefits the person who has to pay the debt back over time, not the person who issued the debt.
No, it's Egocentric idiot #1 vs Egocentric idiot #2 . Please don't lump all neuroscientists and philosophers with them
For now, SFC’s success is more exception than rule, but fuel-cell firms are betting that a green hydrogen revolution will soon reverse the entire industry’s fortunes.
Semianalysis seems to indicate the core space itself is 35% smaller. Maybe that's process tweaks related to clock rate? But I don't think we know for absolute certain it really is the same core with the same execution units & same everything. Even though a ton of the listed stats are exactly the same.
Just to follow up on that last sentence, I read this, today, confirming I wasn't the only one thinking it:

"So accustomed are we to viewing Putin as a master tactician, that the opening salvos of Wagner chief Yevgeny Prigozhin’s disobedience were at times assessed as a feint – a bid by Putin to keep his generals on edge with a loyal henchman as their outspoken critic."

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/24/europe/russia-putin-wagner-pr...
You might genuinely not be a travel person, but sometimes people just hate the specific kind of travelling they've experienced.

For instance, many Americans try to cram all of Europe into their two weeks there. They end up seeing a major capital with centuries of history in 6 hours. Perhaps they'd have a better time strolling around Poznan for two weeks.

I think that travel is a lot more pleasant if you reject the completionist approach and just try to have a good time while expanding your horizons.
3kw
if not open source or API is not available, benchmarks can't be independently reproduced, its hard to take at face value any claim of outperforming GPT3.5, which is a major claim that must be verified first (Falcon has had similar reproduction issues https://twitter.com/Francis_YAO_/status/1667245675447468034?...)
Note that I carefully used the word "likely". There is no proof. Simply Occam's razor.

Why would something that has no consciousness make up that it has consciousness?
I really dislike these types of papers. "Pfft look at these neanderthals studying complex system X by observing surface properties and trying to make deep inferences! Nothing like us mighty computer spacemen!"

A circuit is a highly systemic, regular design which can be precisely studied in isolation. It is not so easy to carve up a human brain, cell, or metabolic process so that one can study this thing hidden to the human eye. The only tools available require working within artificial constraints to have any hope of picking up trends. Biology is incredibly messy full of overlapping systems, sometimes operating at cross purposes.
Why? The article has a paywall about half way through.
But I'm sure every physicist on Earth would love a deeper explanation of how gravity comes to be. The motivational basis of science (and philosophy!) as an exercise is filling in the lacunae in our understanding of the world; everything we don't know about matters.
And we have proof of it happening. A few weeks back, Kaspersky labs and the FSB found thousands of Iphones had been taken over by the NSA or another ABC agency. Russia subsequently banned all Iphones for any government usage. https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russia-says-us-hacked...

You might say well I am not on their list to target. That could change at any time if you speak up and start becoming a problem. They did it to Tucker Carlson.
Oddly enough, I've had a lot of issues with Firefox on Windows crashing with OOM issues in spite of having GBs of free memory. Multiple different computers, multiple different versions of Windows.
Pretty much all (~90%) of all home mortgage loans are fixed rate with no prepayment penalty in the US, guaranteed by the federal US government taxpayers of course.
why do we need facebook?
Right. My two cents: trying to find the neural basis of consciousness is like trying to find the Rules of Baseball basis of the cutoff man.

It's an emergent phenomenon.
Tracking pulsar arrays for decades is modeling a gravitational wave background
Nobody distributes binaries compiled for AVX-512 for obvious reasons. The only times you'll use it are for source-based distros like Gentoo, and programs that do run time feature detection, but they are relatively rare and won't be using autovectorisation.
Genocide is not defined by number of victims, but rather by intent. If the actual target is Wagner and civilians are "side victims" then it does not fall into genocide definition. If your intent is to destroy some group in population, for them to not exist, then it becomes genocide. Even if you fail to kill that many people of use non lethal methods.
ChatGPT is easy to understand. It's a bullshit-generator-as-a-service. It's a very complicated probability model which determines which sequences of words are most accepted by humans. You put in some words and it generates the most acceptable next word, and the one after that, and the one after that, ad infinitum. (If you want to play with a GPT model in this style, I suggest NovelAI for a small monthly subscription price). Now, *Chat*GPT is this same thing dressed up to look like a question-and-answer machine. They probably just stick some kind of delimiter between messages.

I have read an AI paper somewhere that argued that recent improvements to AI are not from new kinds of AI being better, but from new kinds of AI being able to exploit larger amounts of computational power before hitting the point of diminishing returns. And OpenAI's computational power is gargantuan in AI terms (but probably less than the Pentagon uses to detect nuclear strikes or whatever they do).

It happens that correct answers and true facts are very acceptable to humans, so ChatGPT will often produce these, but in fact it doesn't "know" that the answer is correct - only that it's very acceptable. You know what else is acceptable? Confidently stated answers that are subtly wrong.

"Auto-GPT" is self-directed ChatGPT. It already exists. It's basically a bullshit generator that generates instructions and then follows them and adds the results back into the question for the next iteration.
Root, and a community of people that you trust who are incentivized to audit the contents of whatever updates you install, and the infrastructure to bind that trust to those updates in a scalable and trustworthy way. And tools for catching apps being shady so you can revoke trust in auditors that blessed a bad one.

Root is kind of like the wooden sword in Zelda, it's where the journey begins.

Which dungeon is next is an open question but I'd propose something that installs packages by cryptographic hash so that whatever community we build for trusted packages can publish signed predicates referring to the trustworthiness of their referents without having to also host the packages themselves (given that servers which resolve names to packages become high-value targets and probably shouldn't be trusted). nix-on-droid seems like it could be modified to do this.
I think this is an accurate description of what we're seeing happen to reddit, twitter, heroku, and several of the smaller startups I've worked at.
Duh, that's what I did. And every other variant one can possibly think of. To no avail.

That's what cost me the hour or two.

This works like a charm in a strictly typed language like C#, but TypeScript just hasn't got it down correctly yet.
No.

A Character Type is different than a Caricature, which is Specifically when one is representing a Specific Person or Peoples.

When there is no such intent and is not based explicitly in such prior art, such characters are just that purely imaginary characters with zero bearing on real world racism.

Enough with the bs.
If I make a function with 200 000 stack values and compile it with gcc, people call me an idiot. But when google does it it's fine?
My theory:

Consciousness is a comparison of current sense input with memory.

No sense input, no consciousness.
No memory, no consciousness.

A rock, can have a memory (its chips and wear), but no consciousness since it has no sense input.

Self Consciousness is therefore a comparison of the input of our senses with the memory of our Self.
Also loosely related, the Homo Deus book has a chapter about how humans conquered technically what it classifies as the major challenges that we attributed to gods, including hunger, plagues, and war. It mentions that nowadays, if any of these things cause human destruction it is a political thing and someone somewhere wants that to happen.