skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Definitely, there are pros and cons to each process. They are markedly different, though - Apple wants secrecy, whereas Linux demands transparency. Sometimes patches are rejected or ignored, but transparency is never compromised. This gives insight into how patches are accepted or rejected (eg. the Paragon NTFS), information that isn't public in Apple's process. The separation of users and "blessed" developers remains an enormous roadblock to effectively scrutinizing and quickly fixing Apple's software platforms. It offers some protection, too, but it is a night-and-day difference to how things are handled in the Linux world, dysfunction and all.
It appears that none of the laws in your first article were ever passed?
A simpler way to think of the approximation is that 24! multiples together all fifteen numbers from 10 to 24, all of which add at least another power of 10, and you get approximately another nine powers of ten from multiplying in 1 through 9. You end up around 6.2e23 which rounds up to the approximation.

Going up to the next factorial bumps it up (approximately) another power of ten since you are multiplying by 2.5 and 10. In reality it’s around 1.5e25 which is also a reasonable approximation.

Over simplification: a number times 25 is closer to the number times 10 than it is to the number times 100.
Ok you got me, he’s a pedant from the UK.
Of course, in this case. It's up to the official to dismiss such constraints if unreasonable.

But we got such laws and processes for a reason.
Americans are slaves to cars. We treat the ability to drive a monster truck to the grocery store as a sacred right and anyone who would dare impede our progress for a handful of seconds (pedestrians, yes, but ESPECIALLY those rotten tree-hugging cyclists) are to be scorned and intimidated at best, summarily executed at worst. We've hollowed out our cities for parking lots and leveled neighborhoods and green spaces to make room for ever-expanding freeways, but god forbid we invest in public transportation - the domain of socialists and poor people. And so many of us have effectively brainwashed ourselves into believing that all of this is right and good and not, in fact, utterly insane.
I can access it through my university, but there's currently no way to upload papers to sci-hub, and I can't figure out the anonymous login for libgen.rs

If you add any email to your profile, I'll check back within 24 hours and email the copy to you.
What options are at the EU’s disposal to fix the issue?
Not sure if you can but if you can, feel free to change title to make it more appropriate. HN doesn’t mind.
I have felt since I was a teen in the 90s that the world would be better served if offices, schools, and factories didn't exist. I thought that this centralization just increased the costs for everyone. Why not keep things decentralized and utilize the technologies we've built to manage the communications and interactions? If there's a CNC machine with one primary operator, why can he have that and the material gets shipped to him and he then ships the next stage product to someone else? With 3D printers this is even crazier right? For technologists, the only job that I can see requiring physical proximity is hardware repair and other helpdesk style roles.

I do acknowledge that humans are social animals and there are benefits to face to face interactions, but these come at enormous costs. These costs aren't merely financial as so many people emphasize, but material. The material cost of cities on our planet is quite high. The amount of concrete, metal, glass, and other materials is quite large. With decentralization we would have an increased use of roads for logistical concerns, and we'd have an increased sprawl issue, but there'd be so much less traffic overall I think we'd have a net win on air quality. The next issue to tackle would be expressly limiting sprawl, and I have no idea how that'd be done.

EDIT: Comments have been that this would decrease production. this is entirely accurate. Most items today aren't made to last and we have become accustomed to hyperconsumption of low quality stuff. No doubt. Scale has alternatively raised the standard of living the poorest among us by insane amounts. There is severe good and severe bad that have accompanied this remarkable economic boom of the last 100 years. The thought that I really have regarding this is that Amazon has made it possible to distribute insane amounts of stuff to a distributed buying public and there must be a way to manufacture in the same way. I am not a logistics person, and I could be entirely wrong (I probably am), but it's a dream and not a proposal.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/cummings-jared-kushner... like this?
Same reason why vector databases are a thing. When performance matters, you go purpose built.
This has been my experience, in my area people have even found ways around the newly installed red light cameras, they just remove their license plate. Usually you would get hit with a pretty big ticket for that but the police are not enforcing any sort of traffic laws and relying on cameras to do the enforcing.
Simple fix! Build more housing near city centers.

Design communities where people can walk to work, walk to the neighborhood grocery store, walk to the park...

It's all the driving we hate. I'd gladly work in an office again if I could walk there.

I will fight tooth and nail against having to commute ever again.
That's right, thanks obama for big trucks.

Seriously though, this law wasn't passed in 2008. It was passed in 2012, after democrats lost control of the house. This "gift" as you call it, was an appeasement to republicans to get them to vote increase MPG in general.
I’ve typed this before in detail, but this is NOT A LOOPHOLE!

Sure it is. Going back to whenever, heavier vehicles classed as light trucks (or worse) have been subject to less stringent emissions and safety requirements. That's generally what folks are referring to when they mention regulations favoring trucks.

Look at vehicle bodies from 2008 on. Larger every single revision.

That's been generally true since the fuel crisis subsided in the 70s.
> then your real issue is that the shipment or its contents get stolen

No, the chain-of-provenance use-case is to prevent people from being able to sell grey-market products while claiming that they're official products. E.g. selling iPhones built out of reconstituted parts from iPhones that were pickpocketed from their owners and then scrapped for parts. (Yes, this is a big issue — Google "my stolen phone ended up in shenzhen" and you'll get a ton of news stories.)

If you (or a retailer) forces the retailer (wholesaler) to provide a chain of digital signatures demonstrating each hand-off of the parts all the way back to the factory that produced them, then you implicitly reject any assemblage of parts where some of the parts were black-market-sourced. Which allows for legitimate refurbishing using legitimately acquired parts (i.e. it doesn't put the Shenzhen phone-repair stores themselves out of business); but destroys the demand for the electronics "chop shops" these stores currently sometimes order parts from.

In this case, a "blockchain" here is an open-public-participation multiparty ledger that tracks ownership of physical goods; with a digital signature inherent to each transfer of the digital asset representing the physical good, which should be done at time of transfer of physical goods. Unlike other use-cases, you really can't simplify the solution — to enable this use-case, you need a system with pretty much all the properties of a blockchain.
You are trying to inject uncertainty where there is none for the purposes of a prosecution like this.

It doesn’t matter the purpose of taking secret documents. Only that the defendant knew that they were secret and removed them from a secure facility. And since they were an FBI agent, there is documentation of when they were given access to secret documents, so the defense can’t argue they didn’t know the rules around control Those documents. Every person who is granted legal access to secret or better signs a legally binding contract that explains these things.
I think you two are both right in the most obvious of ways... it needs to trained on a ton of data so it can comprehend better, and when it needs to fact-check or search for anything concrete, it should hit up domain experts and databases.
Your second sentence doesn't follow from your first. Have you never fought something on principle, especially when a win could help others similarly situated?
> I don't think this sort of emotional, loose-facted "hot take" style response is real constructive

I do. A basic pedagogic principle is that conditioning works better the closer the consequence is to the action.

They should be afraid of backlash at every turn.

People must be ready to actually walk away, otherwise you get into a Reddit-type situation in which everything ends up just like before.
What’s the DPC’s argument against?
You conflate malice with sloppiness. Out of the American government people there were at least 4 high-profile cases in which 3 of the perps were transparent and compliant, and one wasn't. It does make a significant difference.

Trying to make secured email as significant as physically moving many boxes with many documents many times on purpose is a bad flame bait on your part.
I did the same and ended up using Chrome to generate invoices too, after years of painful workarounds with other tools and methods. So much time was wasted on different tools and methods, until Chrome HTML print-to-PDF proved to be reasonably reliable and attractive.

Especially PhantomJS whose updates tended to break the invoice formatting severely (like radically changing the rendered font size in PDF across a PhantomJS update).

Firefox required a virtual X server, but that was doable. I'd prefer to use Firefox, but unfortunately its PDF rendering screwed up the thickness of border lines, making them far too thick or not present at all, though it did a better job of pagination than Chrome.

And even having settled into using Chrome for this, there are two ways to generate a print-to-PDF that produce different results in Chrome, at least when it's Chrome on MacOS. Only one of them lays out my invoice PDFs correctly.
Are we revealing our age through exploits now? How about "using gopher on a university library terminal to access a site that launched a telnet session so you can check your out-of-state college email over the summer"?
Sometimes I spend time remembering how nostalgia used to be.
It disregards the fact that, as long as most men and women remain heterosexual, there's no divorcing social pressures on one from social pressures on the other, because these will at some point become indistinguishable from the same thing.

Feminism has trod this ground before, with political lesbianism and lesbian separatism. The results of these experiments are not such as to suggest they are worth repeating, which hasn't stopped that from happening in the form of last decade's unsurprisingly abortive "MGTOW" movement.
Someone wants to get started in AI/ML today and they have beginner-level understanding of Python/Javascript. Without any further context, but a desire to learn AI/ML and building on what they know should that person next look to:
1) learn PostgreSQL, pgvector, and whenever the "new" comes
2) learn PyTorch, TensorFlow in Python
3) learn TensorFlow.js
Presume hobby-level interest, not production-safe best practices - so I guess there is that additional context
hahahaha

that's why it's important to have a confirmation step for POST/PUT/DELETE operations (READs should be fine tho)
Using Space Hoppers During the Conservation of de Havilland Comet 4C
To meet UN biodiversity and climate goals, 79% of plant cover must be saved
We're blaming drivers because it's a core responsibility of driving to not injure or kill people with your vehicle.

There's no corresponding responsibility inherent in walking. In fact many people who walk also have other statuses or impairments that prevent them from fully perceiving the world they are walking through, such as blindness or being a child.

It is the driver's obligation to ensure the safety of the people around which they choose to operate their vehicle, regardless of their awareness or behavior.
Well the best thing you can personally do for the environment is probably to kill yourself, that would reduce the environmental damage you cause in future to near-zero

More grandiose plans would be somehow triggering a nuclear war - making mankind extinct would be great for the environment in the long run. Not many people can do that, but I guess if you work hard you might get into such a position.

Assuming you don't want to do that, reducing human impact on the environment is of course good.
Not at all, but I am realistic enough to know that we cannot have over 8 billion separate definitions of the word “harm” that are actionable. There needs to be a standard that is agreed upon and the law is the source of that.
Funny story: I took Scheme around 1995 for my first college programming class at UIUC, and nobody told me that we could split our code up into separate lines of execution. So I turned in all of my assignments for the semester as a multi-page function composed of higher-order methods executed in one shot. My teacher must have stared at some of them dumfounded, because they all worked. Although remembering back, I don't think I was the only student doing that!

In the end, it helped me see that all programming is basically a spreadsheet and analogous to the STDIN/STDOUT stream processing of Unix executables. All of the stuff we think of as programming, like objects and classes, is basically hand waving to make problems/solutions supposedly fit in the human mind.
Once Apple becomes flexible on the web engine, it will be nice to see Kiwi go to iOS
which should be fine, because heavy EVs aren't exactly more environmentally friendly, they just make very different trade offs. Yet, they are more deadly, destroy roads faster, and devalue quicker (half its value come from the battery).

Small City EVs are great though, better for environment, better for not killing more pedestrians, better for urban planning, and cheaper!
dead

I felt that tho
I genuinely hope one of these systems gets called “Tightbeam”
http://scripting.com/2014/08/08/myBlogDoesntNeedHttps.html
If you were to bike around my city, you will notice that between zero and one percent of vehicles will come to a full stop at any stop signs or while doing right turns on red lights. For pedestrian safety, I think rolling right on red lights is worse because the cars will often only be looking left, and never check to their right for someone in the crosswalk or a cyclist approaching on their right.
What's the benefit of this RA4M1 processor over something like an Arm cortex ? I see the only thing that sticks out to me is the 24 volt tolerance?
I could see legitimate risk with RFID tags. One of the tools sigint uses is simply the volume of transmissions going from one point to another. You can wrap tagged documents in RF blocking covers but eventually you'll have to unwrap them to view. You might even be able to infer the kinds of documents being moved if you track routes. White House to DoE etc.

Sounds far-fetched but there have been some pretty wild methods lately about timing screen flashes to determine hash creation and stuff like that. Nothing is too far-fetched to intelligence gathering.
> However, from a hyper environmentalist position, this invention unfortunately ended up fueling all manners of wars through the specific material requirements, cobalt being the prime example

That's simply not accurate. Very few wars have been fueled by cobalt or the general material requirements of Li-ion batteries. Nearly every other major resource have prompted far more wars than cobalt (oil/gas, gold/silver, water, land, agriculture, etc).
Full disclosure, I work for an auth server vendor.

So there are three primary use cases for OAuth (I'll include OIDC as well, as they are often paired and OIDC is built on top of OAuth).

* Authentication. Using OIDC for authentication lets you use one of many authentication servers (FusionAuth [my employer], Keycloak, Python OAuthlib, Django with https://django-oidc-provider.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Auth0, Cognito, etc etc). Using such an identity server lets you have one single place to store user data. It's normalizing user data, which has the same benefits and tradeoffs as normalizing any other kind of data.

* First party API authentication (where the same org controls both the end client and the API server). This is comparable to API keys, but has some differences. Setup is more complicated, but you have credentials that are automatically time bound (tokens expire), support multiple useful flows, and have a refresh mechanism built in. Plenty of security experts have banged on OIDC/OAuth and helped fix issues, and j random developer you just hired is probably more familiar with OAuth than your custom API key scheme. You also have the ability to put more data in the token (if you use JWTs) and have the tokens verified without contacting a central server. This can lead to some nice scaling properties.

* Third party API access. When you are the client and want access to third party APIs, you have to use what the API dictates. That is often either OAuth or API keys. OAuth here has a lot of flavors. See this article which was on HN a month or two ago: https://www.nango.dev/blog/why-is-oauth-still-hard

Source: I work for FusionAuth, an auth provider which supports OAuth and OIDC, and help support users and customers implementing FusionAuth.
I love algorithms over partial orderings such as topological sort and also the B.S.P. trees used in computer graphics. Often you have really neat things that work when you wouldn’t expect it.
It is utter fud / bs.
I’d like to know more about the principles of the “coalition made up of people who make adult entertainment” referenced in the article.
People care about the commodity, not the mine that harvests it.

Similarly I don’t care if it is a 5 acre family farm or a 100k acre corporation that supplies the corn I eat.
Both can be and are true simultaneously
Agreed. Sometimes I feel that most traffic laws only exist to serve as stand-in probable cause for forces' own agendas.
Because I really hate staring at sentences and wait it to end.
I think the solution is for those funds to divest in those investments, not for society to change course in order to keep a certain investment vehicle.
And what's the woman's perspective in all this?
>My experiences with pedistrian near misses have been when people step in front of my car while staring at their phone

Which means you failed to see the pedestrian a yield to them. You caused the near miss.
So they keep millions of dollars worth of samples in a single freezer in a single location?

The loss of the samples was an inevitability and regardless of who pulled the plug - a cleaner, a power cut or a faulty compressor they are solely responsible for the loss.

Assuming a cleaner would read a note attached to a freezer, given they no doubt have to see lab notes all over the place - and probably have instructions not to move or read the notes - is completely delusional.

IMO the blame falls squarely at the feet of the researchers and RPI and at worst the cleaning company should agree to terminate the contract (thus losing the $1.4 million per year deal they had).
So your stance is that people fighting for 1st amendment rights are actually just in it for the money, assuming they have an easy workaround they could just use as an alternative?
Lithium-Ion Battery Pioneer, Nobel Laureate John Goodenough, Dies at 100
> But then your rent/sqft number goes down

Yeah, that's the issue.

I'm sure there's plenty of demand for commercial space on a lower rent. Commercial space is much more than offices, but those things are priced so that only high-margin artificially high-density knowledge work can afford them.

Our modern cities are clearly not economically viable (proof of that is that people can't afford to live in them), so yeah, something will break sooner or later.
The 52/53 series chips don't have WiFi though. Wonder how the nRF7002 stacks up against the ESP chips.
5V GPIO is something the Uno line has historically had since the very beginning (and an assumption of having it is baked into thousands of getting started with Arduino books and guides) and I suspect using the RA4M1 is to help keep this capability.
This is a concern we hear often. We have taken some steps to ensure that we do right by users in case users want an exit.
Firstly, we use broadly adopted projects like ArgoCD for GitOps for apps and terraform for infra under the hood, though the tf is not exposed right now. All your config is in standard formats and can be transferred over.
We are working on exposing these natively (and securely). You would be losing "push to deploy" CI pipelines though, since that requires hosted infra and workflow management that is actively done by Argonaut.
Hope that answers your question.
Are you pretending to be a moderator? Referencing widely documented news isn’t an insinuation. If you want to see the links yourself you can just ask - not every post here has citations linked even when already widely available/known (I see several people have provided several references already)
Why is it a stupid reason? If you love climbing rocks without ropes then dying in a rocking chair having spent your life not climbing rocks without ropes probably seems like a waste of your life.
Exponent bias is like saying the exponent is one bit less and one bit following the sign bit indicates if the value is less than 1.0 or greater. All this to allow properly comparing those numbers.
> If your teams work with AWS, GCP, or Kubernetes, I’d love to hear about your experiences, pain points, and what you think a product like Argonaut should be able to do.

Using Kubernetes in Azure (and this might be Azure specific), there isn't enough easy diagnostics via point/click for production issues. It is a nightmare trying to figure out why something happened and feels like you need to gain more expertise (at time sensitive times!) each time it does. Azure has improved over the years in this regard. But it might be a Kubernetes thing.

A cool feature would be "This pod stopped, and didn't restart for 10 minutes" and the reason is "{the reason in plain English}".

Kubernetes feels like a leaky thing to throw abstractions over, so the pain with using it is you need to become an expert in it, more so than the serverless offerings that are more genuinely abstracted, like the various app platforms that run the containers directly, or functions.

I guess even when managed by the cloud host, it is more serverful (e.g. the need to SSH into VMs to do security hardening checks), but then there is this beast running on those servers you need to understand too.

And at that point you need a lot of engineer time anyway and probably a platform separation to deal with it all.

So I think if your product could remove some of those kinds of issues it would be good - but then I am still trying to work out "why choose Kubernetes and not some sort of app service" for the majority of users (I am keeping an open mind!)
I'm a tad disappointed. Cool idea, but I haven't gotten anything to really sound seamless when shortening or lengthening yet.
Does anyone have any recommended background reading on how bubbles and "time bombs" work? Why don't these things behave according to normal price supply demand curves where the price would slowly come back down to earth over time. I've seen this repeat time and time again across certain assets, and always being curious about the underlying mechanisms.
I was just at a developer conference and was amazed at how many people used Auth0 and OAuth interchangeably. They've done a super job of capturing mindshare, and have a great brand.