skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry, but Zen 4c (like 9754) don't have the massive L3 cache or the fast clocking of Zen 4 (like 9684X). They're chopped down Zen 4's. 32 more cores is only good for hyperparallel HPC where the working set is smaller. That giant L3 cache and faster clock of Zen 4's is going to perform better in almost all other cases.

And Altra's are old PCIe gen 4 and DDR4, while AMDs are PCIe 5.0 and DDR5.
most people including me pressed yes to every question. it was 12% of the respondents.
Last year I volunteered for a few hours at a coral farm operated by a non profit that restores reefs. I didn't even know it was possible to grow coral before that.

I would assume technology like this would be useful after newly planted coral was established, or maybe at an artificial reef like a sunken ship.
That's the same paper.
Netflix produced content has become so irrelevant for me that whenever I want to watch something I look for thumbnails that don't have the Netflix "N" in the corner. For me it's just algorithm generated junk now, it's a shame.

I wish I could cancel it but my partner wants to keep it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Not sure about the "ease" of writing programs that scale efficiently to 128 cores.

If we're just running several processes there's not much difference from just running 8 computers each with 16 cores.
in a some NL cities they have bike sensors and the speeds are low enough to signal a stop across a bike lane keeping it flowing
This concept was alluded to in a comment on HN a few weeks ago. I'm interested in seeing how this plays out. I'm inclined to suspect that Prigozhin is vying for affection in the typical manner of a mercenary chief. While his frustrations may be legitimate, I doubt that a coup was ever a possibility.
Residence times of greenhouse gases are on the years to centuries timescale. The economy tanking was a blip in the rate emissions were added to the atmosphere, but the net balance was still positive. And even if it wasn't, a single year of net zero emissions would make a near negligible change to the existing inventory of greenhouse gases, which is up almost 50% over the highs of the past 800k years. There would be a detectable drop in methane (half life of 10.5 years) but not too much for CO2 (hl of 100+ years).

Getting to net zero isn't going to substantially reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or stop warming in it's tracks, it's just about limiting how much higher the temperature is going to get (at least for the short to medium term).
Just listening to the sounds from this Myst remake brought back some core memories of playing our neighbor's state of the art Atari 2600, and it was a fun way to spend a cold winter afternoon. I can definitely believe that those that didn't grow up with it would find the graphics (and sound) lacking, but if it was your first home video game console, it was amazing.
Hugging face hub Python library has a Rust package to accelerate downloads
https://github.com/huggingface/hf_transfer

> This library is a power user tool, to go beyond ~500MB/s on very high bandwidth network, where Python cannot cap out the available bandwidth.
Sorry for the late reply. Holy cow this thing got expensive! https://www.amazon.com/Photographers-Toning-Book-Definitive-...

It is the most comprehensive guide to toners I have ever seen. Glad I kept a copy of it!
It's an incredibly important point -

We have so many a-ha moments ahead of us in this field. Seemingly minor changes yielding task speed multipliers, fresh eyes on foundational codebases saying now why the heck did they do it that way when xyz exists and works better, etc. A recent graphics driver update took my local SD performance from almost 4 seconds per iteration to 2.7it/s because someone somewhere had an a-ha moment. We're practically in the Commodore 64 era of this technology and there are only going to be more and more people putting their eyes and minds on these problems every day.
Luckily, I was able just now to switch from Standard to Basic FWIW
To expand on this, healthy human brains seem to be made of many interacting systems which function in different ways. It may be that in the future we view the search for one simple formula for "intelligence" / "understanding" / "consciousness" (pick your poorly-defined poison) the same way biologists view the concept of elan vital.
And/or suggests that the person you are replying to could benefit from, e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy.
As a side note, I believe iCloud Keychain is supported on Windows now.
wow incredible, thank you this is it!
What did you try?

While I agree nothing works perfectly, FileRun or SeaFile does at least work more reliably than NextCloud, though there aren't as many integrations as NextCloud has.
Notice that this only crashes on an out–of–date kernel. No matter how much money Google has, you cannot expect them to test their websites in every combination of browser and kernel version. Not even on a handful of carefully–selected kernel versions. Maybe Mozilla should test Firefox on more kernel versions (an argument could perhaps be made for testing the older kernels from various distros with long–term support, for instance), but really the whole reason Firefox has crash reporting is to catch the really weird combinations that happen in real life but are hard to continuously test for.
Coming Soon to Roku City: Brand Advertisers
Because React makes you add a bunch of boilerplate and extra steps in code for performance like useMemo(...) that simply aren't needed in Svelte.
Minetest has a working browser build, client and server! https://github.com/paradust7/minetest-wasm
How is Hugo photo publishing effortless?

Also what is the Hugo iOS experience?
An llm can detect when an llm has outputted an inconsistent world.

It can reason. To an extent.
I expected this to be tough, but it was even tougher than that! I treated it purely as an exercise in classifying what is a vehicle and what it means to be in the park.

Skateboards really tripped me up because I don't think of roller skates as a vehicle but I do think of bikes as a vehicle. Skateboards feel like they sit right between those two.

The wagon was another tough one because the kids riding in it certainly seems very vehicle-like to me. And the stroller felt even more like a vehicle to me (ultimately I didn't choose to classify either of those as vehicles).

I said the horse wasn't a vehicle, but I said the rowboat was.

I didn't classify the RC car as a vehicle, but the classification of a quadcopter was tough because of that. I wanted to consider it a vehicle, but I couldn't think of it as far enough off of an RC car to be one.

I tried to figure out some logic for my classifications but I really couldn't it was all down to feel and making sure that I didn't clearly contradict a previous decision. My answers may have been different had they been presented in another order or even just if my mood was a bit different!
Down the Gopher Hole
> The Aus Gov style guide states a transitive verb is when the action of the verb "passes" from the subject to the direct object. That makes no sense.

Perhaps not to you.

The verb action is from the subject to the object .. it transitions directionly as does current through a diode.

> So did the lunch buy itself?

No. It's odd that you'd even think that.
It’s often only obvious some new technologies are a fad in retrospect. It’s hard to tell how they will be adopted, Second Life had a very enviable early growth curve.
Yeah well I really don’t wanna maintain or pay someone else to maintain a persistence layer, when I already have an iPhone and pay for iCloud subscription.
> I've never met an irresponsible soloist who wasn't a beautiful soul.

Romanticizing suicide is gross.
A concept is an abstraction.

Abstractions are a way to characterize the behavior of complex systems. It's not feasible to directly compute their behavior, but they still have predictable properties. Concepts let you handle emergence; you can manipulate an object as its own thing rather than a collection of atoms.

(And yes, I did just read Stephen Wolfram's book and this idea is largely based on it. I think he has some delusions of grandeur but is also onto something.)
> And according to the article, the issue isn't that TS doesn't realize it's the same object, it's that the object might have more keys than what is declared in your interface.

The main issue at hand was inability to use `options[key]`.

"the object might have more keys" was a possible issue, and was the reason typescript was blocking access to `options[key]`, but it wasn't the main problem.

> It has that same problem actually:

> Perhaps what you meant to say is that you can directly use `val` instead of `obj[key]`.

How is that different from what I said?

Because you can directly use `val`, and because that's better than `obj[key]` anyway, you "don't have the problem of being unable to read obj[key]".
Because the audio is only your half of the conversation, you could just record what would be convenient to have said before the conversation, then say something different, and just upload your prepared file.

It’s not like just because it’s in a blockchain, its content is truthful. It just confirms it followed the rules of the blockchain.
Yep, it's a good challenge too. I'm not giving up on the idea of E2EE, of course. Just trying to find ways to do it so that there are no compromises with usability.
Litestar 2.0 Incoming: Faster, Stable, Proper FastAPI Alternative
Litestar 2.0 is launching soon , currently in beta2 stage. Please try it out . I have posted our reasons of choosing it and moving away from FastAPI and becoming contributor to Litestar.
Formally it was known as Starlite. Litestar strikes a balance between simple micro framework and enterprise full-stack frameworks.
The team is helpful and very collaborative . Feel free to join us .

Github: https://github.com/litestar-org/litestar/
Discord: https://discord.gg/aJUvZRse
Do Porsche owners have fewer accidents even while driving other vehicles? That would make a huge difference. But either way, Porsche drivers probably don't drive in rush hour traffic or on interstate highways, in any vehicle, period.

Also, another important question: What counts as an "at-fault accident"? If you back your car into a traffic cone, does that show up in these statistics?
Yeah, but the FAA doesn't have authority to set prices, this is a pretty cool example of doing what they can with the variables the do control.

In the software world everyone is really obsessed with quality as an isolated thing, they want beautiful code and fast performance, and workarounds for external variables you don't control are disliked, programmers have a "Let it fail" kind of attitude.

Always interesting to look at the life safety stuff and what they do when failure is not an option, and it doesn't matter who's fault it is, you make it work if you can.
>My guess is that he was counting on support from within the Russian power structure that was promised but then didn't materialize

Thats not how russia works. In russia you show up with a gun, say "Im Tzar now" and everyone obeys out of fear. Occupying main centers of power in Moscow (MoD, TV, Kremlin) would be enough for Prigozhin to claim being the new ruler. That one brigade "defending" Moscow didnt even have heavy weapons. Wagner tanks would cut thru them like hot knife.
Time is not a synchronization primitive
I believe you're right.. it has Chrome support on Windows but not macOS :P
Mozilla isn’t blaming Google here, or they wouldn’t have bothered to fix the bug. When you drill down to the root cause of something, you have to carefully note down all the proximate causes that you found along the way, otherwise you won’t have a complete understanding of the problem. In particular, noticing that Google’s machine–generated javascript is doing something allowed but out of the ordinary is important for explaining why you only just now found out about this bug in code that has been working just fine for years.
> Why not invest some time and money into making your tools more ergonomic and enjoyable?

I did that for many years. After switching from one machine to the next, one operating system to the next, one IDE to the next, everything constantly changing, year after year - I found myself in a job where I had to reinstall the OS and everything on it from scratch, every two weeks, for a year, because... well. Because! By the time that was over, I had given up customizing much of anything at all, and that has been working out all right ever since.
> but it's also true that the lower bound may no longer seem that deep of an abyss as it appears to most.

> Hence the mental equilibrium in-between being at a point that can seem somewhat alien to those who live more slow-burning lives.

I suppose that requires a profound amount of empathy from both perspectives. And even with infinite empathy, at the end of the day, it's still two aliens staring at one another across a chasm.
Sure, but no-one was arguing that.

Let's all start a fund to build bars closer?

Congrats on that break-through.
Why protobuf? Does it really need that or would JSON/MessagePack work?
I think you would be very interested to read their takes on HN articles and Fossdem :p
Data quality like you're describing just doesn't matter. GPT is trained on PEBIBYTES of data. Any individual reddit thread is an atom in a drop in a bucket. All of reddit is < 2% of the total training data, regardless of quality.

Yes, the correct thing to do is get more data. Much more.
I think a lot of people are just naive and simply don't understand that the good feelings and high minded ideals are kayfabe. The US is the country at the forefront on advertisement and propaganda, so this is not really something that should be surprising.

The kayfabe works very well too, so why would they stop.
I see several huge red flags even on a cursory examination:

1) The framework deliberately rejects industry-standard tooling like Composer for installation and uses a desktop app (actually an Electron app with a faux-retro theme) for installation, updates, and boilerplate code generation.

2) The framework itself is not written in idiomatic, modern PHP. It doesn't use namespaces, or strict_types, or indeed any types at all. It contains no inline documentation, but does (unfortunately) contain a substantial amount of inline HTML. There's no indication that any of it has been run through a static analyzer, or even a prettifier. I haven't looked at the code generated by the desktop app, but I have little doubt that it'd be similar.

3) There are some serious structural problems inherent to the framework. The most obvious is that their "Model" class isn't actually a model base class; it's a simple database abstraction layer which only supports trivial CRUD queries, and which conflates controllers with database tables.

4) The developers often seem focused on vanity metrics like gathering Github stars ("we need 1,200 GitHub stars to make Trongate a top ten PHP framework") and gaming benchmarks (requests/sec with an empty application is a poor metric).

None of this is conducive to a quality PHP framework. I don't want this to sound too harsh, but the authors really need to become more familiar with existing frameworks and development workflows before setting out to create their own.
Based on what i watched by Yannick on YouTube and haven't actually read... Questions weren't part of the paper but authors made a goof and included all of them in GitHub. Shortly after they deleted these questions but as part of a new commit so one could see the change, thus all the questions.
I clicked around the website on mobile and it seems to be missing the fairly critical 'about' or 'readme.md' page which describes what the project is or what it is used for. I'm sure it's an exciting project, but I'm not going to read about it unless I know what it is.

From the comments here I gather that it is an IRC client, but that should be one of the first lines displayed on the site. Also, what makes it different?
There’s a new article every day on HN talking about the ethics of AI and many of them call out Microsoft GitHub’s Copilot, so I guess you've been missing a lot.
Sure, consider what would need to happen for a system like this to actually be implemented. How would the car know what kind of road it is on? How would the car know the appropriate speed? What happens to sports cars and other enthusiast vehicles? What happens with existing vehicles?

All these questions raise privacy and reliability concerns in my mind, not to mention the distinctly weird feeling of some outside party deciding what I can and can not be trusted with. This feels authoritarian to me, and as a proposal feels reactionary in the sense that the solution is simply “ban it”.
Demonizing people connecting with one another through shared pain is even worse.
There are definitely still many rough edges and sharp corners!

For software developers and sysadmins with certain temperaments, though, I think it's definitely already a good fit. A lot of NixOS people come from Arch and Gentoo, and it works well for them— although Arch folks who are deeply aligned with its keep-it-simple philosophy are probably usually turned off by Nix.
That is what I have heard as well. Let’s be real, antisemitism never fell totally out of favor in Eastern Europe. I never bought for a second that Putin or any of the higher ups were worried about it. This also explains how a Jewish man can be called a Nazi with a straight face by Russian media and leaders. For many Russians, Nazi means Western European aligned organizations that kill Russians.
you could banish all typical, repeatable, pointless discussions to one day a week: "free-style Wednesdays" and reserve rest of the week for news that are actually new and educational. also could be interesting to see "no rules/mods friday".
> makes all the supposedly hard questions about consciousness very simple to answer.

I'm intrigued!
Dictatorships tend to be extremely popular. Saddam Hussein, for instance, was elected with 99% approval! These dictators must be good at something.....
> "Zelenskyy is of Jewish descent, his great grandparents died in the Holocaust, how can he be a Nazi?"

This level of kindergarten logic from a grown ass men never cease to amaze me.

>> In March 2015, Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov announced that the Azov Regiment would be among the first units to be trained by United States Army troops in the Operation Fearless Guardian training mission.[282][283] US training however was withdrawn on 12 June 2015, as the US House of Representatives passed an amendment blocking any aid (including arms and training) to the regiment due to its neo-Nazi background.[284][285] *However, the amendment was later removed in November 2015,[284]*
> For the tables there's very little transformation, and a huge chunk of verbatim text.

IANAL either–but how is the copyright owner (MIT presumably) harmed by the reproduction of these course descriptions? It isn't like they harm the commercial value of the courses in any way; the course is the actual product here, the description is just sales and marketing collateral, and has minimal value apart from the product it is selling.

Furthermore, given the fact the paper was coauthored by MIT employees – arXiv could argue that MIT (through its employees acting as its agents) had granted them an implied license to reproduce it. Which is the other issue – even if this isn't fair use, MIT may have agreed to license it through its agents. You can still be bound by the actions of your employees, even if those actions violated your own internal policies–especially in dealings with third parties who had no reason to suspect there was any such violation.

> I don't see how there is any gain versus just publishing the course numbers and titles.

"Algebra I" and "Algebra II" don't mean much – what topics do they actually cover? A one sentence/paragraph course description adds a lot, because they tell you what topics are actually covered. Yes, someone could probably look it up on the MIT website – but it saves the reader a lot of effort doing that. Especially if someone is reading this 20 years from now, by which time the content of MIT courses may have changed a lot (despite having the same title), and finding what their content was 20 years ago may require a lot of research effort (if the reader even thinks to do that).

> Publication of the (possibly) previously unpublished copyrighted work in figure 4 fully and completely destroys its value

Figure 4 is likely not the "work", rather a small quote from a much larger work. How does a small quote from a work (even if allegedly unpublished) "fully and completely destroys its value"?
Yeah, they seem really focused on usernames. The sad thing is that you shouldn't just figure out a user-ID-to-username endpoint because that just creates a TOCTOU opportunity. You have to have GitHub accept a user ID directly on the operation you want to perform with that user, or else something could change in between getting the username and operating on that username.
I don’t know if this has changed since I last used WeeChat, but I really wish there was just a configuration file I could edit for all of the settings. Most of the settings seemed to involve command prompts and they don’t port well between machines or can use scan a file to see the changes and additions you've made. I want to stick it in my Nix config and set it up on new hardware with no fuss like I do with almost all my other programs.
China’s already all in on renewables, it helps that they’re the cheapest option right now

The US really needs to step up though, they’re not even in the Paris agreement
Honestly, exactly recreating my byzantine python installation(s) would probably be impossible [0]

(In all seriousness, after switching to Arch I've actually solved this problem by simply installing python packages I need from the AUR)

[0]: https://xkcd.com/1987/
what about Ubuntu (or Linux in general)?
Earth when it melts humans away upon failure
Also true about every single consulting firm
TLDR; it's a 100% custom EV, specifically designed for taking on Pikes Peak.

The tech seems pretty cool to me, but further removed from any traditional street car than an F1 racer or a top fuel dragster.
Not true, its pretty easy to pick a diverse basket of unhyped, sane stocks and beat index funds over ~10 years.

But daytrading is just throwing your money at institutions and quant traders.
I was just pointing out why your suggestion that hybrid work is a solution was a dumb idea because it's the worst of both worlds, but you appear committed to a willful misreading of my comment, so...have a great day!
Hell no. This hybrid stuff sux. I want to be 100% remote
“Some of them” = the group leadership who name the group, given that it is a Nazi reference. Richard Wagner was a notorious antisemite and Hitler was a fan.

It’s like calling the group “88 Division”. Sure, not all of the grunts working for them are dyed-in-the-wool Nazis, but the leadership sure are.
If it's not actually possible to simulate a system within the confines of physics, does it being deterministic actually matter outside of thought experiments?

I feel like a random system and a deterministic system which cannot be simulated are effectively the same thing.
TLDR; let's you compare the network, the fees, the minimum credit score required for approval, and many more features, to help you decide which credit card(s) you might want to sign up for.
But is that the point of the perspective?

My understanding is that they're asking the question: are the tools we apply to the task able to solve another related but much simpler task?

If the answer is no then we should probably take another look at our approach.
You are not aware. I have many personal friends, Engineers, making 600K+. These are old friends who have no reason to lie. I know a senior engineer who manages a small team who had a lucky take-home of over a million in a good year.
People overreact to this paper because it's from MIT. Lots of crappy papers out there, this is just another one. MIT is not special, they have a lot of average people too.