skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have found that Asimov alleviates this issue.

https://github.com/stevegrunwell/asimov

I wrote a tiny blurb about it here:

https://nabeards.com/time-machine-backups-ignoring-npm-modul...
There is some percentage of $x who hate $y for almost any value and combination of $x ad $y. It's not meaningful or constructive to look at the extreme nutjob examples when examining a movement in its entirety.
Indeed. I think that's sort of what I was saying, but you put it better
Dug sounded exactly like how I imagined my childhood dog would talk if he could've.
Does this not work?

https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/functions/cookies
That 2% is still a big cost. I think In-Situ Resource Utilization is what we need to make it cheap enough to do more in LEO.

I know it's insane but mining water in space and sending it back to earth seems to be one of the best options.

Edit:
If you're down voting can you let me know why?
In the Southern Hemisphere (especially the Anglosphere countries due to our heritage of pasty white people), it's to prevent sunburn and especially cancer. Yeah, sunburn sucks, but thanks to the ozone hole that forms over Antarctica and then drifts northwards, melanoma is very high.

And so is the sunburn risk, you can burn in 10 minutes here, but repeated sunburn increases melanoma risk.
Another example of this kind of thing is demonstrating that the set of rational numbers are countable.

Each rational number has the form a / b for a pair of integers (a, b). This representation could be non-unique, e.g. 1/2 = -3/-6 are two different representations of the same rational number as fractions of integers. For this representation to be unique let's require the denominator b to be positive and a, b to have no common divisor. Let's consider (a, b) a point with integer coordinates on the lattice Z x Z, where Z is the set of integers (Z = { ..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ... }).

We can count each of these points if we begin by labeling the origin (0, 0) as "0" then (1, 0) as "1" then (0, 1) as "2",(-1, 0) as "3", etc. We can order these integer lattice points first by their increasing magnitude |a| + |b| from the origin and then by the angle they make relative to the origin and count them all one by one.

Informally this shows that the set of rational numbers is not larger (in the sense of cardinality) as N_{>=0}, the set of non-negative integers. It's not smaller either as the set of non-negative integers N_{>=0} are a subset of rational numbers.
.project is out because of how it would interact with Eclipse and derived tools, which used the name first.
Blocking one of the biggest on-ramps will surely work wonders for adoption.
Sometimes a bad movie is just a bad movie.
Coco is my favorite pixar work
I don't understand the link with the flag. Can you explain?
Most of my Rust projects, even large and complex ones, don't have any build script at all. That made me realize how much time and energy I used to waste on maintaining build scripts.
>Horses are not extinct.

"While genus Equus, of which the horse is a member, originally evolved in North America, these horse relatives became extinct on the continent approximately 8,000–12,000 years ago. In 1493, on Christopher Columbus' second voyage to the Americas, Spanish horses, representing E. caballus, were brought back to North America, first to the Virgin Islands; they were introduced to the continental mainland by Hernán Cortés in 1519. From early Spanish imports to Mexico and Florida, horses moved north, supplemented by later imports to the east and west coasts brought by British, French, and other European colonists. Native peoples of the Americas quickly obtained horses and developed their own horse culture.[5][6]"

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horses_in_the_United_States
Remeber the uproar over cameras on phones? Then the fury over a person bringing a google glass into a bathroom. Now people film themselves in the bathroom.

No one cares as we live in a very connected world where privacy is almost gone - in fact many people like broadcasting themselves. (To add - I don't like nor endorse it - "computas shoulda stayed hard!" is my motto. But that is reality. Hell, my friends kids ape youtubers and they're just 6 or 7 years old. I find it gross they find it cute. go figure. poh-tay-toe poh-toh-toe)
This doesn't apply to the land component of the rent.
I check these kinds of projects for funny Issues or Pull Requests, but there are none.

Some examples from other satirical projects: enterprise support, marketing strategy, continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD), or Dependabot integration.
Oh I like that. It would include people that enjoy working at open-source companies, but their role might not be directly foss-related on the daily (eg: devops, website, etc). Thank you for pointing that out.
Aka the perfect product name.
Because I wrote about something Miles said in that interview.
Yea, I just stopped reading when that started up. I don't understand why people intentionally make their websites annoying to read.
> * Use a WHOIS lookup service for the hostname, find who's the registrar and submit an abuse report to them.

I used to regularly report Runescape phishing sites, reporting to the registrar is extremely effective and quite fast
They're no longer trying to be subtle at all. Movies have become stuffed with outright political lectures, and always coming from the same view. I just want a movie being itself without politics shoved into it.
It seems that the situation has improved a bit lately, I still get the Pinterest links, but not only I tend to get the actual image a bit more often, but Pinterest results get lower ranks. Essentially "we couldn't find anything good, so here is a Pinterest link so that the result page is not empty".

Or maybe it is just me and Google profiling algorithms finally realized that I don't like Pinterest results.
Yet another victim of the pandemic. Real shame since 6 months ago DreamWorks absolutely demolished the "sub-genre" with Puss n Boots. There's definitely an experience you get in a theater that can't quite be recreated at home with all it's distraxtions.
Ok so like this seems to have been written today but I think it’s notable that the Mac they showed in the post is running a five year old version of macOS: I don’t actually think this is a good idea anymore, and I say this as someone who ran a Raspberry Pi in a similar configuration for a while.

Today, if you’re using Time Machine, you should back up to an APFS volume with snapshots. They are far faster and more reliable than HFS+ disks. I get the feeling that macOS might at some point stop supporting new HFS+ backups altogether. So, I wouldn’t recommend making them anymore.

Unfortunately, APFS drivers for Linux kinda sorta don’t exist. Not to the point where you’d want to rely on them for backups, anyways. So the move here is really to just get a Mac to handle this. My network has an old MacBook Pro (one of the last pre-Touch Bar ones) wired into the backbone for this. It’s pricey but believe me, this is the setup you want.

(By the way, if you’re using Time Machine to a network share, I recommend keeping another “worst case” backup that you refresh periodically. The network disk is convenient which is good for having periodic backups and quick access but from time to time this setup is liable to Time Machine corrupting itself in a way it doesn’t know how to fix.)
I think the confusion over the licensing definitely indicates there is an opportunity for us to communicate better about this.

In terms of there being an actual better solution, though? I don't know. We're doing what other products are doing.

We remain open to that possibility there could be a better solution tho. But we haven't yet seen anything to convince us we're not on the money as we are.
This line was good:

"The sheepish alienation of sitting through “Inside Out” amid the static of my fellow-theatregoers’ sniffles and nose honks must have been what Data from “Star Trek” felt like all the time."
On the back of Lightyear. This is unprecedented where Pixar's concerned.
Just landed in DC. In the air, the pilot told us it was an air traffic control malfunction. Circled for 30 min. Other planes diverted to Pittsburgh. Dulles, Reagan and Baltimore affected.
The movie is strong enough that we all forgot about the dogs. I feel like this is not very uncommon, for example, the second half of Stripes was mediocre but the movie is overall good.

I think a really strong premise and first half can overshadow some weaknesses, including an even a bad ending.
It's not that men are portrayed as fools and women are not. It's more likely that women in the shows you are describing are there as fillers and not as characters of their own right -flawed or not-.
Yeah, f your tech is meant to "federate" the internet, being a block on the larger old guard isn't the way to go, unless your tech really ain't much.
Yes. According to wikipedia, they were invented by GM in 1969, but it seems they didn't become a standard safety feature until the 2000s.
It's definitely confusing, but thankfully there are folks like 2PJ who can do it for us! :)
> If they have this big tech edge over their competitors, where’s the benefit?

Most of it is behind huge paywalls compared to their competitors. There's e.g. no serverless version of spanner that is pay-per-usage. Same with Big Table. Even the newly released AlloyDB has a huge starting cost.

If no 1 knows and no 1 can feel for the advantage it doesn't really help.
The absence of Lasseter has undeniably left a noticeable void. It was imperative for Lasseter to be held accountable (and arguable if that even happened), though, without a shadow of a doubt.
> You can be against this lady, but also be against deepfake porn targeting women only at the same time.

To be clear, I am against deepfake porn. But I'm even more against these kinds of people who make a career out of abusing real victims to create positions of power which they then abuse for unrelated actions that were the real reason in the first place.

Just like how you can be against child porn and yet raise some eyebrows with some of the suggested policies like Apple's scanning all internal photos.

If you're willing to let morally questionable people gather more power because of bad things, you'll be surprised to find out more bad things happening compared to if you just didn't care.

She strikes me as exactly that kind of psychopathic person, and whatever action she's suggesting I'm sure to avoid doing it. And I don't believe her for a moment.
Handout design (LaTeX) inspired by Ed­ward Tufte
So many asses out there excusing their self indulgent rude behaviour as "telling it like it is".
The alternative for a lot of things is the root directory having almost nothing in it, because the main content is already split from the top level directory by:

- node monorepos by putting everything in the packages directory

- python repos by putting almost everything underneath the name of the package

What might help some who are annoyed by this perceived clutter is to be to jump straight into the main content in the subdirectory. Getting the other files moved out only helps it a little because you don't have to go through as many items to click or cd into the main content's directory. It doesn't remove a whole step. The steps are still 1) to go to the repo and 2) click or cd to the directory that has the main content.
Well, network number, gateway, broadcast, one left for host.
The absence of the constant background hum during the most strict phase of pandemic shelter in place was something else. I don't wish to re experience it under those circumstances but it certainly gave me a new perspective on noise pollution.
Next.js is good overall. It has changed a lot over time and has some things that were not ideal like the whole getserversideprops and getstaticprops but the new App directory I am really liking, the new changes work more inline with my mental modal of how things should work.
Brene Brown studied it. It does not turn out well for men:

> I was not prepared to hear over and over from men how the women — the mothers, sisters, girlfriends, wives — in their lives are constantly criticizing them for not being open and vulnerable and intimate, all the while they are standing in front of that cramped wizard closet where their men are huddled inside, adjusting the curtain and making sure no one sees in and no one gets out. There was a moment when I was driving home from an interview with a small group of men and thought, Holy shit. I am the patriarchy. Here’s the painful pattern that emerged from my research with men: We ask them to be vulnerable, we beg them to let us in, and we plead with them to tell us when they’re afraid, but the truth is that most women can’t stomach it. In those moments when real vulnerability happens in men, most of us recoil with fear and that fear manifests as everything from disappointment to disgust.

I posted this on HN before, and out of the woodworks came all the anecdotes of bad reactions to male vulnerability. I strongly advise other men to not discuss their feelings in depth with any woman they have romantic interest in, and possibly women in general since I've seen mothers similarly affected.
Just do what everyone else does, say you work at Google and you're leaving because the quality of the free t-shirts is declining.

I think they removed my review, but they still let me in afterwards.
I have bad news to share with you if you think movies were never political.
Most Time Machine weirdness comes down to metadata mismatches after migrating from machine to machine.

I made some fairly simple shell scripts to help fix these issues.

https://github.com/torstenvl/tmutils

They're pretty beta so if you use them please be careful. There are confirmations for major metadata changes, and the dirdedupe script runs in test mode by default (you have to use the --execute flag if you want it to actually do anything).
Interesting, maybe: Are any of those women not white? Aside from Beef, which I'm not sure counts as much since the actor was also the writer and the show doesn't have any main characters that aren't asian.
The problem is that in the common case case those IP addresses are useless and serve no purpose. Broadcasts get broadcast because they are sent to broadcast MAC address. They can have IP packet with all-ones destination inside (which is different from a unicast packet sent to that same address via its unique MAC), they can have IP packet with a specific destination inside (well, maybe your ARP cache is malfunctioning, and you've forgotten the proper MAC address, but not the fact the host exists?), they can have arbitrary data (because you've invented our own protocol). You also need to call a different function or set some flag to make broadcast happen. It is possible that early IP stacks relied on a dedicated high-level broadcast address to prevent the need to handle all kinds of underlying networks in programs, but I'm not sure.

(Trick question for the exam is whether broadcast traffic received by new host with assigned address of .255 would be a problem.)

HOWEVER, if you want to broadcast something at a remote network, you need to have dedicated network broadcast IP addresses. Unfortunately, even RFC 919 from 1984 thinks it is not a recommended mode of operation. But imagine that we could get "ip/subnet" from DNS, send broadcast to a distant server farm, and receive response from anything that responded. Instead of DNS-based service discovery, we would have a single A record, and finally put that IANA port number database to use in port-based service discovery.
Harrison Ford may have appeared in five Indiana Jones movies, but he hasn't acted in one since Last Crusade.
The answer is not as simple as the analogy suggests, but the principle of the problem is that the conflict resolved by the rat driving the human around is central to the theme and the characters, while the dog flying the airplane is not.

I used to have a high opinion of Up, having originally seen it when it came out in theaters. It was only on a re-watch that I was shocked by how much of that opinion was based on what is essentially only 15 minutes of the total runtime. Ratatouille is fundamentally about a ratty artist overcoming his background and prejudices. Up wants to be about an old man managing to move past his grief, but the climax (and most of the movie) involves a stupid bird and a stupid kid that only detract from the experience.
Which political lectures? I haven't seen Elemental yet.
I feel like Pixar is just a classic case of a couple of truly brilliant visionaries and founders creating a truly incredible company, they get rich and leave, and eventually the suits come into control and it's just never the same again. This process also seems to be happening to Google, TBH.
This is one of the most hacker news comments of all time.

Absolutely critical levels of "kids these days."

"Driving was better before it was easy!" It must be exhausting to think this way.
They're getting sneaky about where the overflow:hidden is applied these days, and one site I encountered had JS that polled that attribute and reapplied it if it was modified.

I was impressed at their commitment to dickery.
The word 'subtle' was included.
Maybe adoption isn’t the goal. Just a thought…
Most of the people I know who have done those races are essentially competing against themselves- they want to say they were able to do it.

I haven't met anyone who was actually competitive about it in terms of wanting to be the fastest or whatever. I suspect it is a minority of the group, who in turn are also a minority of society.

If we are making generalizations about what humans need, I wouldn't consider "fighting against something". Perhaps "being right on the internet" would fit more people.
> There's a reason virtually every culture is patriarchal.

It's because men are physically stronger than women. That's it. That's all it is.
This whole post is about quantifying exactly how different the treatment of .0 is to other addresses. The answer is: not much.
> Everybody remembers the fantastic opening sequence but seems to forget that it ends with dogs flying airplanes.

That’s not the end of the story - that’s the start of the third act.

It actually ends grounded in reality - a return back to the world they started in, without fantastical creatures, and the boy getting his explorers scout patch back in New York City. It ends with Carl giving him a bottlecap badge which has a sentimental link to his dead wife.

A return back to reality from an unknown/mythical/magical world is basically the fundamental basics of the hero’s journey “mono-myth” (transition from the known to unknown) so purely from a structure perspective I can see why it resonates.
Meh. We'll make more.

Can you?
I'm mid 30s now and my childhood is full of instances of me being treated with contempt for being a boy by my teachers and female peers. Like, outright mocking in ways by teachers that in retrospect I would consider nearly traumatic and abusive.

Maybe public, unashamed contempt is more recent?
Maybe they should take a page from Bluey's book :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEQHiJVH79o
Thank you! That's interesting, I did write an article on SE about ECS back in 2013, but I think it's the first I ever published a proper piece on networking - I do link to an important Glenn Fiedler's blogpost when describing my deterministic architecture in README but just in case I'm not him, I hope I wasn't too misleading :)
> “Cars” (2006), the only first-wave Pixar original that has no fans above the age of twelve

Really? I thought it was thoroughly decent. Solid performances from Owen Wilson, Paul Newman, Larry the Cable Guy, and Cheech. Original story, tasteful comedy, interesting plot twists, actual character development, timeless look&feel. What more is there to want?
Were they ever? One of their most acclaimed movies featured a scenario about a society that litigated superheroes out of the public eye. Another featured a society powered through fear, and a lie to induce and justify said fear. And I can't even describe Wall-E as a metaphor so much as a blunderbuss shooting straight into it's audience.
Movies were political, but:

A. This “it was always political” is a common intellectually dishonest crutch to defend the placement of politics you agree with,

B. Some politics and light theming is very different than making it the core of the movie. One fart joke is not a fart jokes movie.

C. The politics were never so explicitly partisan but just general themes such as the stupidity of being racist or being against teamwork - not jokes about widely-controversial modern issues.
The article does not mention the departure of John Lasseter, who was forced out because of sexual improprieties during the Me Too movement. He was the creative force behind the glory days of Pixar.

If someone has information that he was more of a figurehead, I'd welcome it. But this seems like a pretty big omission.
Just pick one.
No it's to mitigate "leftpad" style attack vector.
> Microsoft on the other hand has 3 generations of games that run on Windows, which is still the dominant OS in a growing gaming segment.

But what does it matter that Microsoft owns the OS? They don’t see a dime more because of that except for the OEM Windows fee and tiny sliver from OS ads.

Steam is the predominant sales platform on PC, which again Microsoft doesn’t earn a dime from.

Sony has ported or is porting all their successful 1st party and 3rd party games. Nothing is stopping them from doing that for all the games they think customers care about. And the supermajority of customers care very little beyond current gen, maybe one gen back.

I don’t see consoles shrinking a whole lot either (once you cut out the spike from COVID). I use my PC with a bunch of fancy tricks and Big Picture and it still has plenty of weird bugs. The most recent annoying one is having to manually override DPI scaling on Ori, and choosing my TV as the monitor for Ori and Halo MCC. Funnily enough both Microsoft games (although I am not saying Sony’s games would fare much better).

Maybe that a revival of Steam boxes / Steam machines will change that in the future.. or hell, maybe the EU breaks open the console walled garden. Who knows.
The thing I've never managed to get my head around is why the .0 was ever treated specially. It's the simplest human-readable "address" for a network, but if you do a lot of network programming you get used to slapping the CIDR network on all sorts of addresses, and what does a network stack care about the "address" for a network anyways? The .1 of a network isn't routed any differently than the .0. It's either directly connected, or it's going to the next hop router, whether it's the .0 or the .1.
Hmm, think I will #FefiBlock MOULE instead, they seem obnoxious and annoying.
Someone who hates how their father behaved and treated them, and put their soul into being better as a human being would still fit that "resistance" theme. That resistance could totally manifest in them not engaging in aggressive or corrosive behavior toward other men, if that's part of what they hated in their father.
Ah yes, let's punish and ostracize one of the largest silos for their attempts to be open to federation.

Why, exactly?
Rhetoric suggests[0] you use either 'get' or 'go', not both.

[0] http://rhetoric.byu.edu/Figures/A/anaphora.htm
Yeah, this rule in general seems pretty anachronistic when any old idiot can spin up a YouTube channel in approximately 5 minutes.
"shoved" was also included. And I don't even think there's a DreamWorks movie as heavy handed as Wall-E, which we considered part of the "Renaissance"