skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Are you saying that American Heart Association, NHS UK, British Dietetic Association and WHO recommendations are wrong because people can't be bothered to change their diets.

Those recommendations are not inherently incorrect. If obtaining Omega-3 from algae were not an available option, it would be a viable choice. If fish populations were not severely depleted, it would be a suitable choice. If there were considerably fewer humans, it would be a reasonable option. However, it appears that environmental impacts were not adequately considered in their viewpoints.

I have selected a citation affirming that plant-only diets are a viable way forward.

> experts recommendation exist in the context of culture

Culture is just stories we tell ourselves. Those stories may not be true or moral or right. It's better explained in this short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7JE8j5Ncmw

> As a society we don't know how to generate a lot of food at the lowest price possible without the side effect of massive harms.

But we do know how to generate a lot of food without excessive harms. The only problem is ... price. But there we're getting to the problems of our current system. That would be even harder and longer discussion.

> Metabolic illnesses have significant increased in the last 100 years ... likely contributing cause is our current lifestyle of using artificial light and Sedentary lifestyle

Other possible culprits for the increase in metabolic diseases in past decades include factors such as changes in dietary patterns, increased consumption of processed foods high in sugar and unhealthy fats and lack of physical activity.

We're eating much more meat/dairy that we've been eating in centuries before, and we're using too much poisons in our food production.

> for many people eating plants only is extremely difficult

Many individuals have depleted gut microbiomes due to Western dietary patterns (e.g., processed foods, sugar, lack of fiber), but this can be resolved through dietary changes. The number of individuals who require a diet solely comprised of animal-derived foods would be extremely small. Veganism's definition also includes a practicality clause.

"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."
The model the OP trained also runs on a computer. If I'm not mistaken, it also runs on Python itself.

Which means you don't need to count all the bytes in the infrastructure all the way down to the electric grid, maybe. You can compare a sorting algorithm to a sorting model, as stand-alone programs, on their relative size, and that will give you a good idea of how much work each is doing.
This approach can be massively simplified by using CSS variables for your colors and only putting the color definitions in a separate file.
I'm sure you're the most and maybe only rational person in the room. Other views that are well reasoned can not possibly exist, they must be the outgrowth of emotional manchildren and wömen. Maybe you should adopt an ancient Greek name.
> All this is recounted, thrillingly, in “The Art Thief” (Knopf), by the journalist Michael Finkel. It is his third book, and also the third one to search for meaning—moral, aesthetic, existential—in criminal acts. This is an interest he comes by honestly, or, more precisely, dishonestly. In 2002, Finkel, who was then a contributing writer at the New York Times Magazine, plummeted from grace when the protagonist of an article he wrote, about allegations of child slavery on West African cocoa plantations, turned out to be a composite character. The Times fired him and soon afterward published a lengthy correction, which took his transgressions from private to public and took a sledgehammer to his reputation.

So a sensational story about a unique person being told by someone who was caught lying about a sensational story about a unique person?
I think it's more intended to be a proof of how people have a difficult time applying clear-cut rules without relying on their prior biases. That (conceptually) is a really good exercise and one that we could all benefit from. The implementation, explanation and result transparency otoh, are garbage.
I'll argue that the police can enter the park with their vehicles, but they'll be violating the rule when they do so.

But if we're ignoring local rules and the only question is whether or not they would be violating the rules, then yes they would be, and whether they can anyway is out of scope.
There may be some utility to optimizing a given neural network to exploit the features of a given computational architecture. The point would be to expand the width of each layer to hit the limits of your hardware's parallelism. I.e., partition the network into n parts and shallow-ize each one to produce a new neural network with n layers, each of which being roughly as wide as your p parallel computational channels.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36452819 is plausible.
Nothing is wrong with a consumer grade, wireless, AA battery operated, gaming controller as a steering control interface for a submersible taking you down 10K ft under the ocean to maneuver around a 10 story high entangled mess of steel in pitch darkness with a flash light.

And there's absolutely nothing wrong either with the decision making process of the engineers thinking that was a good (and fun) idea.
This like AOE2, where an enemy quietly cuts through the huge forest and the enemy suddenly appears in your base when most of your army is at the front. Your front is wrecked if you run back, and your game is wrecked if you don’t.
Are flashcard system actually more efficient than other ways of knowledge memorization? It never worked for me,I am curious to whether I'm the weird one or if there's anything that can back help me understand if I'm using the system work.

To me, just for the sake of having a data point down, summarisation in writing is how I remember stuff.
Yup, without clarification the rule might be there because any vehicle might just be immediately stuck in the terrain. Or hit a landmine. The assumption of course is that it is just a normal park
Not him, but for the last two years, I aggressively unfollowed all sources that posted wrong or premature information. I kept only those who limited themselves to what was confirmed and openly admitted error in case of mistake.

It is doable. With that strategy, I get more cautious news, not the hottest of the hot stuff, but I am pretty sure thing is happening now.
Ah yes, that is wrong, but I think people who are into russian geopolitics (like me) autocorrected it and had the meaning of the person arrested automatically transfered to Prigoshin as head of Wagner.
Human curation does not scale or cater for individual tastes sadly!
If I remember correctly, the process of recycling iron oxide into iron involves carbon monoxide and results in carbon dioxide, so, I’m not sure this would be as carbon neutral as they claim.

There are other ways of course, but this is only for storage and recycling uses a lot of energy.
For your use case you should definitively give a try to "tableau noir". An awesome open source software i discovered at the fosdem this year.
The video of the talk is probably a better introduction than going to the tool directly:
https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/tableaunoir/

The tool:
https://tableaunoir.github.io/
But if you compare data transfer speed of an IDE 33 rotating hard disk against a SATA (or better Nvme) SSD, and then, once data is transferred from storage you managed it in what amount of (much slower) RAM (at the most in 8 Mb in Win 3.x times, probably 48 or 96 Mb with win 9x, 128 or 256 Mb on NT 4.00 or 2K, while nowadays it is 4/8/16 Gb) and on a single core processor, running at 100-1000 Mhz, while nowadays you have likely minimum 4 cores runnning at 3,000 or something like that.

Sure you had splash screens, the sheer fact that you could open a spreeadsheet amd make some calculations (often with automatic calculation disabled and thus pressing F9 manually to re-calculate) was (IMHO) a miracle in Windows 3.x times.

This is a pet peeve of mine but today developers should be (only for testing their programs) be given the lowest powered machines available, connected to the same (shitty) internet connection a large part of the future users of the programs actually experience and see directly why their programs/tools/websites/whatever are laggish/slowish for their customers.
Here is local news agency in Rostov with plenty of media https://t.me/privet_rostov_ru
I would assume the distinction between trained and untrained networks is a constant factor at best.
To me, a bike is clearly a vehicle. To double-check, I've searched for "list of vehicles" on Google, all the lists I have seen include bikes in them (and I didn't expect anyone to disagree with this).
If you ditch your twitter account and someone else adopts it and poses as you, you can only throw a tantrum. Beware for these twantrum attacks.
The reason they don't train the model on their code is specifically because they don't want it accidentally spitting out snippets of their proprietary code, not because the code is "extremely hard to work with."

I'm amazed you called that argument silly while countering with this.
Easy in what sense? Easy to make that claim? Sure. Easy to actually convince people? I seriously doubt it.
> Though I'd say it's a fairly different mental experience than coding at an interview.

This is the key. Not all pressure is the same.

Shit on fire at work is not actually personal pressure, it's pressure on the company. And to be clear, shit on fire at work tends to be a metaphorical exaggeration, where an emergency code patch isn't going to save the company from imminent bankruptcy. You're still going to have a job the next day, still going to have a roof over your head and food on the table. And your coworkers already know you and respect your work (if you're competent).

This is vastly different from being unemployed, suffering from profound financial worries about your future, and having complete strangers looking over your shoulder, prematurely judging you in the span of a few minutes, where these few minutes can determine your personal fate.

I've done quite a few emergency fixes over my career, but exactly zero of them were lose-the-job emergencies. Whereas every job interview is a lose-the-job emergency.
Over the years I've come across a few online communities that have noticeably higher conversation quality than the rest of the internet. The one thing all of those places had in common is a very strict moderation policy.

Not every forum/community/website should tolerate literally all people. It's never helpful to engage with trolls and if people aren't willing to argue in good faith than they need to go.
I've seen tons of communities slowly lose their identity because they were too accepting of counterproductive conversations and bad faith arguments.

The idea of this form of tolerance comes from the goal be open minded and listen to opposite arguments, as well as to prevent a community from turning into an echo-chamber (or a cult), but I think it's better to lean towards heavy moderation. Banning someone who would be a good fit for the community is unfortunate, but ultimately not a huge loss. Not banning even one troll can drag down a whole community.
> CodeWhisperer is a generative AI service powered by a foundation model trained on various data sources, including Amazon and open-source code.
The people do.

But the moderator can still use vague rules to do what people would not agree upon while still claiming it is within rules, and there always will be someone agreeing with it
same here, rock solid.

not a beta tester thou
Excellent, concise guidelines.

To add to the 'see also' list, the Australian Government Style Manual (https://www.stylemanual.gov.au) is another great reference.
With consideration for accessibility this depends on the simplicity of the layout. In order to achieve WCAG 2.0 AA compliance color combinations must achieve at least a 4.5x luminosity ratio. That can mean different things may require color changes that were not required in the default scheme, as well as the opposite. As a result you really need files with different rules for that 20% that requires more than different color values.
Australian Government Style Manual
> That doesn't aren't right, precisely because it validates conspiracy minded people.

That’s putting it far too lightly. It proved a “conspiracy” 100% true. I had masks early in the pandemic only because a “nutty” colleague said “they’re going to try to take the masks from us” and he brought me a box.
Nicely played I didn't think of those!
Depends on the meaning of rule and violation I guess. I interpreted it as a sign posted at the entrance of the park. I interpreted violation as something that would be stopped by the park rangers.
> - you can't rest your fingers on it. When you use it, you have to keep your finger(s) raised

I rest my fingers on the surface all the time and it's fine?

----

I'm also one of the dozen that like the Magic Mouse; in fact I have the first gen one that takes AA batteries, and it's still working perfectly. It's now the oldest mouse I've owned and used. Prior to it I think I had an early model of the wired optical IntelliMouse.
The intent isn't super clear. Personally, I don't think that emergency vehicles are obviously exempt, we don't know why the rule is there. I don't that bicycles are obviously exempt either, they are clear vehicles that go faster than normal human speeds and the line between motorcycle and bicycle is rather unclear. (Ask five of your friends and associates whether ebikes should be allow on a bike path, then ask about ebikes that hit 45mph, then ice mopeds, then those e unicycle things, then the faster versions...)
Likewise with boats, it seems that there are many cases where no watercraft at all should be allowed, and other cases where a motorboat is fine even if they don't want cars and whatnot in the park. And while flying aover a park is arguably not in it, a helicopter hovering a few feet over a field obviously is in the park and far more disruptive than the other vehicles.

And if i want to say no skateboarding, roller blading, scootering, pogoing, or any alternative in the park?

I agreed with 11% of people, but that is 1 in 10 who agree your take isn't correct. (granted i think a small wagon is ridiculous to enforce under like 90% of circumstances)
Libgen’s coverage of ISO standards is quite poor.
The only start up that got anywhere in aerospace, beyond some toy drones, so far is SpaceX.
I came to a different conclusion and said no police or ambulance should enter the park. Obviously there should be an exception for true emergencies, but stretchers exist for a reason. Police can walk or ride a bike.

The fact that respondents are so sure of the obviousness of their answers highlights common problems in moderation— rules are ambiguous and everyone has different standards.
It's obvious you haven't lol. Your comment reads like someone who hasn't and you never bothered saying you had but just didn't agree on the issue of uality. Even now, your defense isn't "but i have", it's "how do you know i haven't ?", a tell tell sign of someone who actually hasn't bothered.
So you would've considered the Honda Civic to not be violating the rule, if it had been unregistered?
So would a person from any country who supports that specific law would do...
Index for what? The Windows search has always been unbelievably bad and it has only gotten worse since Windows 7.
That is different, it styles the browser chrome rather than page content (at least in existing implementations). On desktop for example one can see the effect by using Vivaldi browser with a theme that has accent color enabled. It also is detected by sites like Discord for their embed widget accent color.
Youtube links open in newpipe also without that app
LoRA Fine-Tuning Technical Explanation
In that scenario the duty to help citizens in need simply supersedes the rule that vehicles are not allowed in the park. So pedantically the EMT and police officer are breaking the rule, but breaking the rule of idly standing by in an emergency is worse.

The reason to allow emergency vehicles to go through the park must then outweigh the benefit of the ‘no vehicles allowed rule’. Something trivial like a pedestrian illegally crossing the street should not warrant the police going on a car chase through said park.
Two things really jump out at me..

I grew up in America which is fairly rule-obeying. Lived in Australia and New Zealand which are disgustingly, obsequiously devoted to following tiny guidelines. Spent a few weeks in Munich where I was shouted at for crossing a totally empty street against a crosswalk light.

On the plus side, I lived in Argentina and Spain for a long time where basically there is no enforcement of anything.

I will say I am proud of people there (in the Latin world) for being humans. mostly ... usually... trying not to make dumb decisions, but... well, having to make decisions, and making them. You see if you live in England or the US or Commonwealth for awhile, people have forgotten how to make any decisions if there isn't a rule for it.

And yet the freest society I ever lived in, judged on the day to day freedom of individuals violating petty laws, was Vietnam. At the same time, it was the most totalitarian place I ever lived as far as what information you could access or what you could say. Still, if you wanted to drive the wrong way down a highway with an child on the back of your motorcycle, you can do that in Vietnam.

Personally I don't like the UK / Australia model where everyone obeys some stupid rule written on the wall over their own intelligence. Of course, I also don't love the Argentinian model where everyone thinks they're smart enough to bang on the button that says "don't touch". Also, it's not cool to wantonly endanger your child while being terrified of mentioning the name of the dictator. But I am a fan of man... and I would definitely take the Turkish way of shrugging off rules when they don't suit you over the British way of following them to the point of worship.

I think I was going to get to some great conclusion here, but I don't have one.

I like when no one is watching me, but I also like when someone is watching other people.

[edit] my conclusion! privacy and freedom come at the cost of people ignoring rules. People from rule-bound countries experience a burst of freedom when going somewhere that lives as people live, not by the rule-book. People from "chaotic societies" as you said, who have a mind for all the corruption they see around them, find some relief in escaping to ordered societies. Neither is good or bad, they are both modes of existence; both modes are necessary. If either were to disappear, we would have far too much chaos or far too much order, and no one would be able to escape to where they belong.
They are both energy. Watts are Joules/seconds so if you're dividing by time and then multiplying by time (an hour in this case) they obviously cancel out and you end up back with just Joules.

Specifically 1 Watt-hour==3600 Joules.
Everything old is new again...

Remember, before we had distribution packaging.
Official distribution would carefully prepare and vet components.

There was the concept to not be upstream, but to stay on "stables" revisions, with major upgrades using version of packages that would be under testing for some time before going they will be accepted into stable.

Company that were doing serious software, were keeping a local repository of sources of all the packages that they had to use. Careful consideration and due diligence was done before adding a new dependency.

But that was before, then low skilled and experienced young developers started to use npm, Dockers, ... And decided that old farts were too stupid to see that we can be constantly updated and it is ok to download random things from the internet at build time in your company pipeline.
Also that it was so much cooler (and safe that they say) to always use the very last version available. Especially if this version is just online since a few hours...
You showcase the pedanticness that made the FSF ineffective in the last decade+. Instead of focusing on the topic about how integrating the AGPL into GNU was very slow, you sidetracked into free vs open, a topic that has been debated ad-nauseum.
No, they are small dumplings

Sandwiches have open sides
It should be the user that is granted control of this regardless of the mechanism. It is more convenient for the user to have a JS toggle in the browser, but a less convenient approach can also be provided on the back end. To the back end the only difference to the HTML, which is just string data, is a single class name on a single element.
They're probably rolling out a new ad engine. Or a bitcoin miner.
Ask HN: Thoughts on leveraging algebraic effects in programming languages?
There's been a lot of discussion recently about the Hurl language and its use of algebraic effects as a way to control flow in programs. Some argue that this approach requires understanding where code was called from and that effects a function may raise are part of a function's type. Others express concerns about the complexity this could introduce, suggesting it might lead to hard-to-find bugs and questioning the benefits over a more traditional callback approach. What are your thoughts on this? Do you see potential value in this approach, or do you agree with the criticisms?
I've been there, it was amazing. Windmills, tulips, canal boats, clogs. The gift shop was themed after Schipol airport!

This article about how the park came to be is my favourite piece of travel writing (it's why we went): https://spikejapan.wordpress.com/2011/01/23/huis-ten-bosch-o...
I see the comments the same way and half the time they seem misinformed. How many Mac users are looking to move windows with the keyboard because the mouse is too much of a burden.
Counting down with signed ints:

for (int i=max-1; i >= 0; --i)

Counting down with unsigned ints (also works for signed ints):

for (unsigned i=max; i--; )
express pupuseria
Visx a collection of expressive, low-level visualization primitives for React
> Does copyright law give you the exclusive right to train a neural network with your work?

Does copyright law give openai the exclusive right to exploit the output of ai trained on my data ? (the model, the weights, etc..)
Case in point the European anthem.
> Or just use natgas peakers for the last 1% and call a 99% solution good enough.

Sadly, no. Given how long the CO2 stays in the air, anything less than 99.9% over all emissions from all nations — and that also includes cement and iron chemistry leading directly to CO2, cattle biochemistry leading directly to methane, etc. — then we're not pushing hard enough.

Natural gas is great as a way to buy time, but we can't let it be more than a rounding error in the ultimate ensemble… well, not unless there's corresponding CO2 capture.
Game of Trees, or “got” for short, is an alternative version control system implementation for working with git repositories.
Props to Elon and SpaceX for lighting a fire under an entire industry; I don’t think there’d be much work in reusable rockets without their work. As I understand it the industry wrote them off. But SpaceX proved it was doable or at least made it sexy.

Same with electric cars. For whatever reason the Tesla marque was so strong and the cars marketed so well and were decent enough it gave all the incumbents the gumption to make even larger more bet-the-company investments in EVs.

Say what you will about Elon as a person and his running of Twitter (horrible) but he sure knows how to be a marketer and to stick-to-his-guns.