skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's a possible interpretation as well. But having travelled extensively (and I'm not the rule breaker in most cases), there are very very different approaches to rules and laws even within Europe.

There is a section of Europe where following the rules is what you do (to be clear it's not just Germany[0]). It's assumed that you're going to follow the rules. Adults don't need to be policed in this way. The rules are there for a reason (second order thinking).

Then there are large parts of Europe where there are rules but if they're not enforced then people will by and large not obey them. See, for example, the UK putting in smart motorways (aka, average speed cameras), because before that people would fly up the motor way well above the speed limit.

The Autobahn might have areas with no speed limit, but on the sections that HAVE speed limits you'd be hard pressed to find someone breaking those limits.

I grew up in Australia where it's somewhere between the two. The enforcement of the rules is strict. I once got a jaywalking ticket for crossing an empty road in Melbourne (long story, but it's also one of my stupider moments because it wasn't like the police were behind a bush, they hopped off the same tram I did).

I haven't had a speeding or parking ticket since I left Australia.

Though, circling back to my Stuttgart story, if someone approached you about rule breaking in Australia you can almost guarantee that you'd have pissed them off to the point it would not have been polite. In Paris, as well, I have been yelled at (in French) for dog poop on a sidewalk that wasn't even my dogs -- yes, I do always pick up after my dog.

[0]: Even within Germany I'm sure there are variations on this.
>I'm villifying their leadership.

Do you think the nukes would hit the Kreml? Or potentially millions of innocent civilians?
I’d have called it “Mother”.

Or “Intuition”.
https://archive.ph/M2Tru
> There are all sorts of things you can do in an hour as a programmer: update a test, fix an automation script, fix and/or test a bug.

Free time to work between meetings is rarely filled efficiently. An one hour gap is either filled by something that's finshed in 45 minutes with the remaining 15 minutes difficult to fill, or filled by something that takes 1.5hrs and therefore requires a context switch.

With meetings its different. They last one hour because they last one hour, not because the content takes one hour to discuss.

But like 1 hour slots for work the same is true for fixed 2-week sprints.

And for containers on shelves, which cannot be placed where the frames are.
> obviously police and ambulances (and fire trucks) doing their jobs don't have to follow the sign.

I agree, but in the sense that it’s okay for them to violate the rule. However, they are still violating the rule, and thus the correct answer in the game is “yes, this violates the rule”.
An additional qiestin would be is : how many experienced groups do they have vs new conscripts with minimal training?
.. it is pretty much the opposite of what you say.

Have you ever seen a European sports crowd vs an American one?

European crowds are passionate. American crowds are exaggerated.
An interesting counterpoint to this

> Cars/trucks/motorcycles aren't allowed, and obviously police and ambulances (and fire trucks) doing their jobs don't have to follow the sign.

Is that every year multiple people in the U.S. are killed by police driving their cars onto beaches and running over unsuspecting sun bathers. So there’s a strong argument that the signs intent is to ban even responding emergency vehicles.
We still have no idea what mechanism causes consciousness. I bet in 25 years we'll be no closer to understanding it than we are today.

I think this is a good lesson for those watching LLMs and thinking we're on the cusp of imminent AGI.
Many of folks who worked on that moved to work on https://design-system.agriculture.gov.au/ https://github.com/steelthreads/agds-next
Man's Right to Knowledge (1954 radio series)
I did a training course on this the other day - loved how passionate the trainer (who worked on the ASM) was about the correct application of quotes within quoted passages
> Relatedly, differentials shouldn't be italicized. Its \int\mathrm{d}x, not \int dx.

I like using https://www.ctan.org/pkg/diffcoeff for this.
Although features around moving cards between decks, drawing from multiple decks, allowing tranches of cards to be released based on other sets of cards reaching maturity, etc. would get me to switch. I've been an Anki user for a few years, and the inability for Anki users to do simple things easily (or sometimes at all) is frustrating.

Having more than a few decks also slows everything in Anki to a crawl. The community has responded by dumping everything into an uberdeck (killing reusability, which gets sourappled), when we could instead be coming up with theories on how best to juggle multiple decks to maximize learning.
Remember when git archive changed its format and that affected archives downloaded from github?
There is a more and zero chance that those flags are not from general user accounts. Also @danf doesn't actually taf him from what I have read, there is an option at the bottom of the page(apparently, I've never used it XD)

Edit:

mailto:hn@ycombinator.com

Is the link at the bottom.
If you clone the repo, it won't be there.
Is it possible to fully embed the "go sdk" into your own golang program?

The motivation is shipping my single binary program which would include go itself. Then the program could proxy the "go" command to build and run code without needing "golang" installed or downloaded if airgapped.
This is a mix of ad hominem and no true Scotsman. And the iss had a clear purpose, if space is excluded, and civics are included, how high counts as "in the park"?
Nice rant. Absolutely unrelated to the technical article at hand, but nice rant.
What kind of park has a biking path, I wonder to myself. I personally have never seen it; generally, paths are either mixed use or pedestrian only. Mixed use is fine, for people who go at an appropriate pace when in proximity to pedestrians, but some people treat mixed paths as an entitlement. It's more common for paths that are on commutes.
Depending on the definition of AGI you are using, you don’t need consciousness for it. I think most do not require it as of now.

Also; ‘it’ will know it has consciousness when it has it, arrogant humans will still deny it.
Of course. Musk as the visionary.

https://nitter.net/OceanGate/status/1336391376372633602#m
None, they're a private company, but: if a rocket company could be profitable while throwing rockets away, there is no way that SpaceX is not wildly profitable when it's getting them back pretty much in one piece.
Now imagine you are not, in fact, on good terms with your neighbour, as sometimes happens. How should you behave in order to not spend every single evening arguing over the meaning of "bother neighbour" with the police?

A more rigid definition serves to protect you, not just your neighbour.
Agreed. The title makes it sounds like we've learned something about consciousness that somehow makes mainstream philosophical approach more correct than mainstream neuroscience approach. Instead, it's just about a neuroscientist making a stupid bet. I call it stupid because he's betting that he can predict than _something that never happened before in the history of mankind_ will happen in the next 10 years. That is very very unlikely.
The bug reported here is a crash, not a freeze, so it’s not the same bug.
There was some doubt at the beginning, but now that Putin made a speech on national TV, I think there are no more doubts.
Is this even true?

How many applications were tested?
Why is the title clickbait? What were you expecting - that the philosopher had proposed a model of consciousness that got experimental confirmation?
All jokes aside, Prigozhin says it's "not a military coup but a march for justice".

Incredible.
I agree, often I write first sentence in technical language to introduce the reader to the existing discussion and then say "In other words" to paraphrase the technical language into more familiar but less precise vocabulary.
No way. No one rose in Putin Russia because of cracking down on corruption - it's the life blood of the regime.

For a long time Shouigu was a minister of emergencies and had very good PR strategy - there were always TV crews following his every move, that were paid from his ministry budget.
This faux bicameralism of "the left" (aka "the libs") V. "the right" is a deeply flawed seppoism, one of their more toxic exports.

For many, particularly central north americans, Craig Murray as a prominent human rights campaigner who actively rebelled against wearing a military uniform and an actual one time President of the East Anglian Federation of Young Liberals is clearly one of "the libs".

Of course then there's the twist that Commonwealth Liberals are typically "of the right" or at least Conservatives .. and the further twist that large numbers (but not all) Commonwealth Conservatives support policy that would be "Left" in USofA politics.

It's probably better to avoid all that nonsnse and just take Murray on the basis of his bio and his writings.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Murray
Using polars and rust might be the best option right now, offering high level operations such as SQL like joins as well as performance. Although im not a rust programmer and i only use tbe python library polars, so please correct me as necessary.
“This airplane design will be done much faster if we use lead and tungsten in key places.”
I’ve had the same experience reading about history.

My idea of it would be a Gantt chart. Because the history is still linear. But Gantt allows for dependencies and parallelism.
I just used CSS variables at my portfolio [0]. I just don't feel like adding a toggle in it to switch between light/dark mode adds something of special value in this case.

[0] https://miler.codeberg.page/
What you wanted to describe is already very clearly mentioned in one small paragraph on Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two%27s_complement#Why_it_work...
Then you are repeating the same mistake as the other person: Who is your source? All of the stuff you said, which engineer or scientist is actually saying those things? And no, some well-known critic like Paul Martin doesn't count. Those are outmoded and outdated people, and are totally clueless about recent developments in the field.

On the other hand, real engineers with real experience in the area are saying the exact opposite: https://www.repairerdrivennews.com/2022/09/01/bmw-bosch-anno...

In reality, you are just repeating the claims of some random armchair expert. These days, those seem to be usually battery car fanatics. Though you still see the occasional pro-biofuel or pro-fossil fuel guy. Either way, it is coming from a totally unqualified person.
I have been both an engineer doing engineering work (I hate the word “maker”) and a manager. I found this article infuriating and still do.

This article is a pure product of this period when software developers thought themselves as extremely special and above such petty issues as having to attend meetings. It’s entitlement masquerading as wisdom. The truth is everyone has to balance their time between obligations and slots they can allocate to do longer work. Writers have to meet their editor. Artists have to plan for the logistic of their exhibitions. That’s part of life.

You can work for a bit do something else and get back to what you were doing. If you can’t that’s an issue with you, not the nature of your work.
Either the man is suicidal or he has backing that has yet to be revealed. Also, being a mercenary, there's also the possibility he's been bought by a higher bidder.
Russian sturgeon is endangered species, because it's hands down the most delicious fish in the world. Especially when grilled or hot-smoked. It is truly in a class of its own, well above the rest. Add to that being the source of the caviar and it will get you eaten to extinction.
I wouldn't be surprised if consciousness ~conscience~ is just an emergent phenomenon resulting from any sufficiently powerful cognitive system (either biological or artificial) with sufficient inputs of its environment and, crucially, of itself. So as to be able to develop a rich model of itself and its relationship with its environment, and that thing will resemble a whole lot what we call consciousness ~conscience~. Then, of course, we will push the goalposts on what conscience is, so as to protect our fragile human egos.

EDIT: fixed spelling of consciousness. Apologies from an english second language speaker.
Like Icarus: Russian mercenary Yevgeny Prigozhin falls foul of Kremlin old guard
We all care mainly about our own lives, our own freedoms.

The author is an adult dissident journalist writing about world affairs; when he talks about an attack on freedom, he means his freedom to do his brand of journalism. Anything to do with school libraries and school bathrooms is utterly irrelevant to his daily life, and (from his point of view) not really worth discussing.

By contrast, for a queer school student (or a friend or parent of one), school library book bans and school bathroom gender laws are a blatant attack on freedom; while Twitter's censorship of dissident journalists at the behest of US three letter agencies is utterly irrelevant to their daily life, and (from their point of view) not really worth discussing.
https://archive.is/N3miw
But the gut microbiome is also past the stomach, where the protein degradation occurs. As a result the only place it could have an effect never sees it.
I think we were confused by what you thought you were being "too literal" about.

It's called Monopoly because the winner is the one that gets the monopoly, and because The Landlord's Game originally had a second phase called "Prosperity." "Monopoly" and "Prosperity" go well together.

I'm still confused, actually. The game is not a depiction of Georgism, it's a depiction of the world as it is. The solution is Georgism, which Magie thought would lead to Prosperity.
Name doesn’t matter if the product is good. Another one comes to mind is Craigslist
There is a short mention of “refactoring” and how it is a bad name, I’m not sure why, just read the article in 3mins.
TL;DR: start with the complex things, deduplicate code and use proper data structures once you have working code with multiple use cases.
I'd probably have gone with GPTChat which is objectively the best name they could have gone with.
That’s not behavioral, it’s an initial screen for fit. It. Makes the relationship at least a bit more balanced from a time investment perspective.

It seems most places do this though.
While we don't understand all parts of consciousness, we understand an incredible amount compared to 25 years ago. So we are much closer today than 25 years ago.

There is a fallacy among non-scientists that if we don't understand absolutely all of it, it means we understand none of it. We understand most of it already.
> This is a terrible moment for index funds.

I meant to put money in index funds right now. Not ongoing investment over a long time.

And going back further to my original point, if I had money in funds now I'd move it to Money Market accounts because the risk of a stock market downturn is big (1987/2001/2008 style). You are not Soros/Buffett/Munger or a multi-billion dollar hedge fund.
How droll, isn't this the equivalent of trying to figure out how an operating system works by trying to look at activity on an encrypted SSD?

And how exactly is this a win for philosophers? I'm not aware of any philosopher having made meaningful strides within the subject either.

I'm sure once someone figures out how consciousness works it'll be irrefutable while seeming incredibly obvious in hindsight. Which, honestly, just makes it more frustrating that there isn't a full accounting already. How many key insights are needed to fully describe consciousness and how many do you think have been found? Do you think anyone in the past has figured out how consciousness worked and taken it to their grave because of how obvious it seems?

Maybe it's like searching for the Dragon Balls, and you need to put all 7 key insights together to figure it out.
My immediate thought upon reading the title was, “there’s no way they have proven free will to be a thing”.

And follow up thoughts were along the lines of “did we uncover some fundamental truth of the brain?”.

I got flagged and cant respond, yet again.
At the end of the day there's only so many hours, they cost, and resource allocation is a management decision. Taking emotional and personal interpretations is a chump's game. What's next, PC second-guess the interpretation of any point at every meeting and email? Not useful. How much time would that waste?

If you can't be direct, go somewhere more engineer-oriented or don't ask for help on HN.
> detached from how this should be handled in any real world scenario

When interpreting laws, there is often a concept of the "Reasonable person" standard. The "Reasonable Person" understands that parks banning vehicles is not to stop EMTs. How you are acting in the "real world scenario" is reasonable and what is assumed in the drafting of laws.

You might claim this game is excluding such a concept as being a "local rule" but maybe that can be called... unreasonable :)
The real way to 'get' two's compliment is to implement the combinatorial logic (i.e., gates) to implement both one's complement and two's complement. You'll instantly understand the value of two's complement!
> than a program that's littered with `void*` everywhere

Strawman argument. A properly written C++ program isn't littered with `void*` everywhere in the same way that a properly written Rust program isn't littered with `unsafe` everywhere. You build safe abstractions around the ugly low-level pointer handling, you just don't have a keyword for a clear delineation.

> People miss this all the time when they write off Rust for "needing unsafe to do real programming" or whatever uninformed criticism they're parroting

Hard-core Rust proponents also seem to miss this all the time. Because "you basically write the same unsafe code that you would write in C++ but you now have a keyword to mark it" just doesn't imply the same urgency for adopting the language than "you only need unsafe to implement a few primitives in the standard library" does, which always seems to be tacitly implied until called out, and then the critics are "misinformed."
> I don't think I'm following, you didn't "lose" anything if you didn't sell.

This is the same reasoning as Banks avoiding mark-to-market.
Just get out of here.

Many of my close friends are from the temporarily occupied territories. They speak russian, but they hate russia.

They all fucking hate russia.

For your claim to be so wildly inaccurate shows you haven't even a shred of credibility. And to accuse the Ukrainian government of genocide is disgusting.

Go and take a long hard look in the mirror.
Gödel is snickering in his grave.
Russia Slides into Civil War
i’m so lost work these magical or straight away missing definitions of consciousness .

a dog is conscious right? what would be a minimal test for consciousness?

i’m annoyed that something has to be super human or else „it’s just statistics“. there have to be minimal definitions of reasoning, feelings, self reflection etc.

will we have the tiring chinese room discussion again where for some the emulation does not count because something does „not really“ do something?
x86_32 counts as an old machine (the most recent CPU being the first generation Intel Atom). It's being dropped left and right in favour of only supporting 64-bit machines (x86_64, aarch64, maybe RV64).
I think you would lose a lot of money. Bikes and skateboards alone are going to have tons of violations. Also, I feel like if i had to bet money, boats aren't going to be included unless specified in most but crucially not all circumstances.
^ https://archive.ph/BXifE
Hayes Valley, then Lower Haight. It's haight and Fillmore.
What does free will have to do with this?
The thing is, you don't generally get to know the context or the intent. You can't have a discussion with the sign, nor can it lecture you. A rule against starting a fire might be because the land owner doesn't like burnt patches on their meadows, or it might be because the vegetation is super dry and if you set fire to it you kill not only yourself but also all the surrounding villages, or something in between.

You could argue that the sign should include enough context to convince the reader to follow its instructions, but (a) you end up with signs with tons of writing in tiny font that everyone just ignores because TLDR (and yes, these do actually happen quite frequently in parks around here), and (b) if there is some combination of letters you can put on a sign that works to stop people lighting fires, the meadow guy will put that on his sign because he doesn't want fires and those syllables work. So you've just pushed the problem one level back, but the real question remains the same: do you risk doing the thing you want to, or do you respect the sign?
GC has little to do with it. The borrow checker as a developer tool has much more to do with preventing concurrency bugs and unexpected mutation than it does with memory management.

"As a developer tool" is doing some work in that sentence though. As a language implementation characteristic, the checker can help inform (or, more accurately, ensures that code is written in a way that informs) memory management decisions.
The park may only have one rule, but the quiz has several , including disregarding exceptions to the rule. Yet there are people arguing here that rule shouldn’t count because they disagree with it. Even on a meta level, this is an interesting exploration of how people interpret rules.
We're all 11% on this blessed day.