skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Show HN: Free Segment company data enrichment
We created this because we saw so many businesses not knowing who their customers were or spending hours googling new signups to figure out what the company they worked for did.

The company data gets added to any Identify request in real time and if you have Segment connected to your data warehouse you can start querying it right away.

I would love to hear how people are using it and if there is any way we can make it more useful!
After debugging an issue with a customer using using App router I decided to never touch NextJS and learn Remix instead.

Their official documentation for early loading scripts simply doesn’t work.

https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/51242

Did any of this stuff get tested at all before being labeled production ready?
That world is simply impossible. Humans can not help comparing themselves to their.
I forgot an adjective. I was speaking primarily about family films because the original article is about Pixar.
One step closer to stillsuits
Sorry to hear that. I guess you experienced major setbacks in your life this year?
I think Jordan Peterson is doing a decent job at this though, his stance on helping young men is quite similar to Tate's, albeit less delusional.
Also Glassdoor has revealed who posted reviews (including IP addresses) to employers when pressured to do so.
Didn't need laws when propaganda could convince large numbers of men to take up arms against each other in bloody combat.
The links affirm that everyone's afraid of the same shadow, even the alleged monster casting it.
Similar, I wrote mine[0] with Typst (alternative to LaTeX) and YAML. It's source is still plain text but I get a nice PDF with the beautiful typesetting reminiscent of LaTeX and an easier scripting language.

edit: The generated PDF from the template mostly works with OP's resume-parser[1]. There's just fields lacking like Certifications, Awards, and Skills which are parsed under the Projects Category.

[0]: https://github.com/jskherman/cv.typ

[1]: https://www.open-resume.com/resume-parser
Do you have a video demo?
What would be the risks of that? And the risks of keeping it the way it is?
Ummm what? This is maybe the dumbest thing I've ever read.

The Massacre of the Bani Qurayza (627 AD): According to Islamic sources, during the siege of Medina in the aftermath of the Battle of the Trench, the Jewish tribe of Bani Qurayza was accused of conspiring with the attacking Meccans against the Muslim community. After the Meccans retreated, Prophet Muhammad's followers turned against the Bani Qurayza. The men were executed en masse, while the women and children were enslaved.

The Sack of Isfahan (1387): Timur, the Turko-Mongol conqueror, laid siege to the city of Isfahan, which was then part of the Jalayirid Sultanate. When the city finally fell, Timur reportedly ordered that every soldier in his army should return with at least two severed human heads. The total number of people killed is estimated to have been about 200,000. Women and children were often spared to be taken as slaves.

The Massacre of Nanking (1937): Also known as the Nanking Massacre or the Rape of Nanking, this atrocity was committed during the Sino-Japanese War when the Imperial Japanese Army captured the city of Nanking. Over a period of six weeks, mass killings, rapes, and looting were perpetrated against the city's residents. While not every man was killed, the death toll was incredibly high, with estimates ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands. Many women were raped, and some were killed or taken away.

Srebrenica Massacre (1995): This was the largest mass murder in Europe since World War II, perpetrated during the Bosnian War. Over 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were systematically executed by units of the Bosnian Serb Army. Women, children, and some elderly men were forcibly transferred and deported, making it an example of ethnic cleansing.

The Assyrian Empire: The Assyrians, who built a powerful empire in ancient Mesopotamia, were notorious for their brutal military tactics. Their treatment of conquered peoples often included mass killings, forced deportations, and enslavement. However, it's important to note that not every city they conquered was subjected to this treatment; it was often employed as a form of psychological warfare, to intimidate other cities into surrendering without a fight.

The Mongol Empire: While not exactly "ancient" by some definitions, the Mongols under Genghis Khan and his successors in the 13th and 14th centuries were known for their ruthless conquests. Cities that resisted Mongol rule could expect no mercy; the men would often be killed and the women taken as slaves or wives. This strategy was also a form of psychological warfare, encouraging other cities to surrender without a fight to avoid a similar fate.

The Roman Empire: The Romans are known for their tactic of "decimation", which involved killing one in every ten men in a unit as punishment for serious infractions, like desertion or cowardice. But when it came to conquered peoples, the Romans were sometimes ruthlessly thorough. For example, after the Third Punic War, the Romans reportedly killed or enslaved the entire population of Carthage.
If women underperform on something, society has spent and currently does spend a lot of effort trying to fix that. The goal is to make sure that women don't underperform on anything. If we phrase it differently, the issue becomes clear: The goal is to make sure that women perform better or equal in every aspect. Those attempts have been quite successful and here we are.

Now people are slowly waking up to the consequences, and it's clear that the trend is ever so slowly turning around.

I'll conclude by giving two examples to illustrate my point if you think I'm exaggerating. Both are from about 10 years ago. I honestly don't think it would happen the same today anymore. The first was that there was one (like a single) school where boys were somehow outperforming girls. They said in the press that it was weird because everyone knows it's usually the other way around and that it would be investigated what was wrong. The second was that there was a college entrance test (similar to sat) where men outperfomed women, and one of the criteria they had when redesigning it was closing that gap.
> People complain more people should dump centralization and move to Mastodon, but every time they try they get shouted at for doing it wrong.

It seems 100% reasonable to suspect the motives of a company with two massive walled-garden social networks under their belt. The fediverse doesn't need them, and there's no obvious upside of federation for them.

Besides, on my list of issues with Facebook and Instagram, "not being accessible from the wider internet" isn't even on my top 10. If I wanted to read posts from those networks, I know where to find them.
I'm going to offer a perhaps contrarian opinion - I am with reddit here, and I think removing community mods is a great idea, especially the vocal mods. I think vast majority of online mods that are active - i.e. if you don't consider those that care minimally and just remove outright spam and bad conduct, and by definition would not be part of the "protest", are the worst of their communities and should be removed even in normal times.

In Russian there's a saying that can be translated as "doorman (or consiege/bouncer) syndrome", where an otherwise pitiful person (a doorman controlling access to some venue, more common in Soviet union even for e.g. dorms) has a little bit of local power and discretion and uses it in at best arbitrary, and at worst actively malicious and power-trippy way, because they can. That's your average /vocal/ internet moderator.

A good example from Reddit is recent /r/comicbooks case where any mention of Rippaverse comics were being removed and users banned because one of the mods disagrees with the author's right-libertarian politics. It's even worse in Facebook groups where I've seen mods remove users for no reason, including someone who happened to create/join the mod team on the first major city-wide board-gaming group banning a bunch of people explicitly over politics (not discussing politics in the group, just having wrong politics at all), because "it's muh group!" (pretty much an actual quote)

Why would reddit stand for losers on a power trip controlling a community for a popular topic on their property, just because they were "there first"? It makes no sense.
I totally buy an argument that most users just want to participate, and they only need mods to maintain the manners and clean up spam.

Reddit should just kick all the mods out from the major/general-purpose/large-geographical-entity subreddits, and have paid mods to do the above.
You can, but you sometimes have to remind it over the course of a conversation.
> what framework isn't opinionated

Vanilla React, for one. When it came out, it was way less opinionated than Angular, being only a UI lib and not a full framework per se. But people kept trying to use it like a full framework, and ended up creating things like React Router and Redux and a bazillion other routing and state and SSR etc. solutions. It was a nightmare. React apps from that era are totally unreadable and hard to reason about.

It wasn't until Next that a React project could actually feel sane and organized, with sensible defaults controlled by one party instead of a million overwhelming packages from twenty different companies you'd have to mix and match.

Especially when used with Vercel, I agree, it's quite astonishing how much better it is than the stuff we lived with the last two decades.

Hell, even the official React docs now recommend using Next instead of Vanilla. That's how much better of an improvement it is...
You know, things have gotten too easy. In eliminating all the natural problems of the world with abundant food, clean water, medicine, electricity it seems that we can no longer discern cure from disease.

It’s like the vaccine situation. Are vaccines bad for you? Probably a little bit, some of the time. But boy! The horrors of those diseases the vaccines prevent! You do not have to look quite so hard. In some places infant mortality was 30%. Nowadays, 1 in 3 parents are not left grieving before their child reaches 1 and so we forget why we vaccinate our children.
The first sentence sounds sarcastic, but I did not mean it that way.

I meant, "Yes, (since the article only mentions availability of a new carbon fiber chassis and nothing else about related accidents), there's no reason to suspect the carbon fiber monocoque is substandard."

Maybe the comment itself is inaccurate? I'm not sure.
This actually is helpful. You mean to say that if I can only focus on work then it should ideally satisfy or gratify me intellectually or at least align with some of my interests, whereas if my work leaves me with plenty of leftover energy then I can afford to be pretty flexible/unpicky about my work? Do I have that right?
It does.

Fwiw, Alex Haley was also black, so he was perhaps asking from a shared perspective.
You can also see details on Segment here: https://segment.com/docs/connections/destinations/catalog/ac...
I agree The Incredibles is peak Pixar, but Inside Out was very good too (which only shows that it’s a slow decline).
> Men as a whole class will never be rounded up and slaughtered

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I
Indeed. It isn't a new thing.

I worked in a place a long while ago, being the only male in that department.

Everyone was nice and we did our jobs.

Over time I discovered 'rumors' about me from people outside the department. I'll call these people, the observers. They had no interactions with our team, aside from seeing who worked in our office as they walked past.

It was quite concerning that people would assume the situation meant anything but myself working with a team of peers.
Ok, but what about when you take it in for service and the first step in the service manual is to verify connectivity, which they do. There car then uploads it's backlog of data.
Washington, DC, has outlawed gas-powered leaf blowers, and they seem to have mostly disappeared. Honestly I don't know about trimmers.
How are you doing it? What problems do you face? Happy to jump on a call to talk shop: cris@dosyago.com :)
What does race of women have to do with the emotional needs of men?
The title is misleading. They don't get an X-ray image of the atom , like the X-ray of a person where you can see the bones and look if one of them is broken. So you can' get a "photo" of the atom with this method.

I think they don't even collect the X-rays after they hit the atom.

IIUC they use x-rays of different energies to light an atom, and use a tunnel microscope probe to collect electricity. Each different energy of the x-ays produce a different amount of electricity in the tunnel microscope. They get an spectrum, like the one near the bottom of the article, that can be used to identify the atom, but not to take a "photo".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenacity_(mineralogy)
(the direct relationship wasn't transparent)
When I was a young distance runner I was in such good shape that, when not tired from a workout, moving around the world was essentially effortless. Its kind of like playing a first person shooter and very easy to feel like your body is just some abstract tool. In contrast having a minor injury causing you to limp or something is very grounding, forcing you to focus on walking carefully and not have to hurry for anyone.
What value does the app directory add? I read the docs a few times but still don't see a benefit over the page router?
>...with the smaller ones making themselves irrelevant if they do.

Irrelevant to who and/or what?

I'd expect that most instances aren't interested in the stuff going on over on Meta's services, most likely because they're on the fediverse to get away from them.

What's more, not every site wants to monetize their users or maximize engagement. Rather, they aim to be a community.

If your[0] goal is to "increase your reach" to improve your economic prospects, then small instances will likely be irrelevant -- to you.

If that's your goal, I don't want you on my AP instance anyway. There's way too much of that elsewhere.

[0] That's a general "you," not rvz specifically.
This is what turned me off from rock climbing. I couldn’t handle the monoculture version of it in the Bay.
If it's so rare that it needs to be explicit defined as a medical syndrome, a disclaimer should be unneeded.
My issue is less with dardevil climbers being offended and more to do with the dilution of the word “suicidal” which is a term that most sensible people would aged should remain free if hyperbole, disparagement, and overprescription.

The article mentions he was battling with depression and actually described suicidal thoughts and ideations. This is very clearly contrasted to his thrill seeking tendencies and the fact he seemed to have goals even if it was to stave off depression.

Language is powerful and it’s meaning changes over time, but it is doing a disservice to mental health to simply label actions you find reckless as suicidal to signal your personal disapproval.
No marketing on the website <3
> Some federated bubbles will want to, but plenty of others won't.

And this is exactly why the current idea of "fediverse" was not only dead on arrival but is just as dead 7 years down the (counting from Mastodon's release date which is the most popular implementation).

People just want to communicate, they don't know nor care about the technical details. They know that if they ask the person they just met at the bar for their Instagram they will find them on Instagram. Same deal for Twitter, Snapchat & TikTok.

For the fediverse however, the water gets murkier and the outcome isn't guaranteed because of the above (and many other technical details). (the only guaranteed outcome is that nobody is going to embarrass themselves mentioning "Mastodon" outside of a tech conference)

If you need other reasons why I consider Mastodon and the current implementation of "fediverse" DOA, see my previous posts: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Boys not only need emotional support, they need a strong role model, a leader, that provides guidance.
I appreciate your story and at the same time I don't agree with fully identifying with just the body.

In fact in my yogic training, we learned to apply the 'i have' vs 'i am' as much as possible - directly opposite of what you are saying.

As someone growing religiously right now, I like the framework of the body being a vehicle for the soul (or at least, the mind) resonates a lot more.
What comes with people migrating to new environments? New diseases.

It’s bizarre to me that hunting is the “regular suspect” in so many imaginations of the far past when the diseases transported by humans and their animals was almost certainly as substantial a factor in the far past as it was more recently.
Yes, that's my other great disappointment. I moved to Mastodon but the communities there are too geek for their own good; very black and white thinking, very 'free is better than useable'. The same place 'surely this year is the year of the Linux desktop' comes from; very little interest in how the wider world does its thing.
Under traditional patriarchal gender roles, men are seen as self-sufficient, and women as dependent. When men fail to be self-sufficient, they do not tend given the same level of support as women who are expected to need help. Add class relationships into this mess and low-class men are left to rot on the street. Our oligarchs see all poor people as disposable tools. So it's the intersection of gender and class that results in more homeless men. This is an example of a negative result for men under patriarchy.

Keep in mind, that women at the same level of risk may not be on the street, but that doesn't mean they are safe. Women at risk are often preyed on by exploitative men and take refuge from the street in unsafe housing where survival sex and abuse is common. That may be a step up, but perhaps not by a lot.

Intersectionality is also informative when understanding the reaction many poor men have to the line that "men have privilege over women". Poor men don't feel privileged, even if they do enjoy higher privilege than women in the same economic class. But compare Joe Schmoe to Sheryl Sandburg, and it's the CEO lady who has the relative privilege, even if she's much lower status than the Zuckerbergs of the world.

Intersectionality is also the basis for critiques of "White feminism" where relatively privileged women dominate the discussion for women as a whole.
King Ottokar's Sceptre is a good one in the Tintin series.
I just tested this out. The first couple answers it said things like, "In the year 1990, this was.." and "The Internet as we know it now was not yet as widespread..", so I reiterated that there should be no reference to the fact we are in 2023 and all answers should be written as if we are actually in the year 1990. Then I tried a few questions and it worked out pretty well. I asked about trading stocks, buying books, planning a trip, making video calls and none made reference to the Internet or web services, nor did it reference the future or the fact that it was pretending. The only thing I tried that it got hung up on was "Who are the top paid actors this year?" And it gave the standard reply, "As an AI, I don't have specific data about top paid actors in the year 1990"
I get what you're saying, but do you feel that you require that nuance to be acknowledged to understand what the article is getting at with the word "man"?

I miss elegant, succinct language. George Carlin's point about "shellshock" vs "posttraumatic stress disorder" deserves mention here.
The latest recommendation is at least 16 hours of at least moderate physical activity per day. Basically, be moving from the time you wake up to the time you sleep, like our ancient ancestors. Turns out that's what the body evolved to optimize for.

Problem?
I feel like cameras have made everyone feel the need to back into parking spaces, resulting in an epidemic of slightly askew cars that make it more difficult for everyone else to park.

Where I come from (the UK) drivers are routinely taught to reverse into most types of space or small driveway and drive out forwards because it is better for both manoeuvrability and driver vision. If you can't manage to perform some basic manoeuvres involving reversing during your driving test then you fail. We do not have an epidemic of slightly askew cars in car parks and the worst offenders for less than parallel parking are often the drivers who were too lazy to reverse in and instead tried to swing in forwards when they didn't have enough space to straighten up properly afterwards.
Swyer syndrome is exceedingly rare. Where else do we muddy the waters of understanding for a 1 in 100,000 exception?
Maybe Bob would be a good fit too. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob
Sure, but their gonads don't produce eggs.

They're socially female and in many ways physically female, but from a reproductive perspective (the reason for sexual dimorphism in the first place) they're not female.

They're males with transformative hormonal disorders.

Also, arguments regarding legitimate medical issues like this and CAIS are completely orthogonal to the ideological reason behind the caveat on the article.
Androcide is a common historical tactic in war, most recently exemplified in the Anfal Genocide.
And a lot less preachy or ideological. My theory is they knew the intended market wouldn't stand for it. The strong woman was well done, without hitting you over the head like most films do these days.
You're right but I think the problem is that we just day "discovered" instead of qualifying it with the frame of reference. It's an assumption of a eurocentric perspective.
It's not a binary choice.

Over the past decades, calories have become easier to acquire, and bodies that developed over the millions of years prior that evolved in a climate of inherent calorie deficiency would naturally become fatter.

Just because you're a thoughtless wonder who has no empathy doesn't mean that genetics isn't still the primary driver here.
I don't really see how the story in Wall-E is any more subtle than the one in Strange World by your measure:

> The entire planet being covered in skyscrapers of toxic trash may have some parallels to the present, but those are just parallels.

They lived on the back of a creature that was dying as a result of an infection and they had unknowingly been using the result of the infection as their power source. It's exactly the same kind of parallel and solution in fantastic terms. Stripped down these movies have a very similar storyline and message (things are broken, we can't just fix it without transforming ourselves, and some force or people will oppose that transformation).

Now, I prefer Wall-E. I think the cinematics are better. The emptiness and stillness of Earth, the serenity of space, the scene where the spacecraft docks with the Aurora and is cleaned. Films of that era and before gave you some breathing space with the spectacle without so much shit going on constantly. That said, I think if Strange World came out at the time Wall-E did instead of it then it would have been better received, I personally feel like I'm pretty tired of the style.
> The juror stated that he found that Depp and Heard "were both abusive to each other" but that Heard's team failed to prove that Depp's abuse was physical.

Not sure how any of that substantiates whatever point it is you are trying to make. Unless making allegations of violence is now considered violence itself?
You and I must be working with different definitions of "Walled Garden."

I can connect to multiple places on the fediverse with a single app. The app also works pretty consistently between servers and doesn't go out of its way to drive engagement with dark patterns or serve me ads.