skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not in your camp, but I get where you're coming from. I used to be marginally active, trying to get a run in every now and then, but it sucked almost every time. I pushed and pushed and it still was terrible. Then I found sports / activities that I really liked. Hiking in nature, squash, rock climbing. The latter two feel more like games / puzzle to me, and while I am confronted with exertion, I get totally lost in the moment when doing them. I still run, it's still grueling, but I do it to be better at the things I love doing, which motivates me.
SAX parsers are quick and easy which probably explains their prevalence.
Disk read access access is less and less relevant in normal business application DBs.

It is common at the far ends of scalability spectrum: low end where people use $2 VPS, and high end where big tech can afford to invest a lot in engineering effort to build complex systems that are fine tuned for many levels of memory hierarchy.

Most systems can just add memory until data fits. (of course frequently they still don't, and keep doing more expensive things like having many separate copies for different purposes built in various different expensive projects... Sometimes additionally faux justified by using cloud platforms that charge prohitively for memory)
logs always go to stdout/stderr

hopefully!
If it's chump change, then it isn't really that much waste. Majority of the funds are going to proven successful methods, and the chump change goes on future bets on what might take off.

I don't see anything wrong with it. This is basically how evolution works as well. Take 99% of a proven thing, randomize 1% and then either keep the change or discard it later as not useful.

A lot of things which are now proven successful ideas were once indistinguishable from fads.
This topic has me oddly emotional, not in an angry way. A bit sad, but also, happy-sad that perhaps these things can maybe be discussed in a sane way and we can just help people that need help.

Although I don't agree with everyone here, I see a lot more nuance and reasoning behind a lot of the discussion here. It overrides the overall MSM/social-media picture that says there is only one right answer and all who question it are evil.
The vaccine doesn't help for what I really want this invention for: to kill mosquitoes. The malaria benefit is great, of course, for parts of the world that have that problem, but here in other parts of the world, even without malaria, mosquitoes are a nuisance. I'd pay 10x the targeted price of this thing for a device that zaps human-biting mosquitoes, and I'm sure lots of other people would too, so that "cheap enough" part doesn't sound right to me. They don't need to make it cheap enough, initially, to sell to impoverished nations that have malaria problems; they just need to make it cheap enough to sell to rich nations with people who are tired of being bitten by mosquitoes. Then, after they do this for a while and build up economies of scale, the costs should come down and it should be possible to sell them significantly cheaper to poorer nations for their original purpose.

As for being safe for eyes, I thought part of the idea was to make sure there was nothing in between the mosquito and the laser before firing, though I'm not sure exactly what the plan there was.
Also, in one version, whenever anyone flips a coin, they get tails. Every single time. Except for you, you only ever get heads.

The world crumbles in the pursuit of trying to understand why you only flip heads. Theories are invented, and prizes awarded, but nobody knows that it’s just because that version was extremely specific in its randomness.

In a world where there are infinite possibilities and infinite attempts, all possibilities are an eventuality, including floating brains in space.

This is a thought I had while doing the dishes today.

But I also love that optimism. And there are versions who gave up LONG before where you are! This might be the version where you win!
Weirdly most of my pirated IPFS content is hosted by and served directly by Cloudflare’s own IPFS cache. I can choose which IPFS gateway to download the content from and I always click “Cloudflare” because it’s ridiculously faster than the rest (thanks to Cloudflare caching/serving it).
But you are in the UK, the DMCA had no legal standing there. Did you host on a US service?
A brushless motor controller is basically a DAC anyway - so no need for separate components.

A brushless motor is essentially 3 large inductors. They act as a filter to PWM drive signals, which means that the resultant current is fairly continuous - much like a class D audio amplifier uses the inductance of a speaker to create smooth sine waves.

There's no need to add an intermediate smooth analog stage (which is what a true DAC would give you) - because then either you drive a linear amplifier and have massive power losses in the drive transistors, or drive a class D type amplifier (which turns your nice continuous signal back into PWM to the drive transistors) and you've just added an unnecessary digital -> analog -> PWM sequence.

When you want good low speed control of a brushless motor, the gold standard is a high resolution encoder (often magnetic) coupled with "field oriented control" - which is essentially using your 6 drive transistors to create a magnetic field which is exactly 90 degrees ahead or behind your permanent magnet field. You can use entirely digital PWM switching to create that field, as the natural filtering effect of the motor coils smooths it out, and the resultant driver & motor is highly efficient.

The much simpler "6 step commutation" discussed in the video can give almost as good control at low speeds, but the magnetic field you create in the coils isn't necessarily perfectly aligned with your motor's magnetic field, which means some of the magnetic force generated is just pulling on your bearings and not driving the motor. That means overall efficiency is slightly less and the torque at low speeds is variable depending on rotor position.
Hey there, a little clarification - I don't claim that I came up with ECS itself, only a particular implementation of it that is very memory efficient, and Unity's patent concerns a specific implementation as well - sorry if that was a bit misleading. As for the title, I just couldn't resist making the pun, maybe you're right though that the packer should be talked about separately.
Learn how to install OpenCV on Forlinx OK3588-C EVK for efficient image and video processing using this step-by-step guide.
It boils down to the same thing. Demand for things men are primarily doing / willing to do / capable of doing hasn't significantly decreased. It has merely been commercialized and subsidized in a way that it isn't at all obvious the need for men is still very much there. Hence, the lack of a need for men, whatever form you imply, is not the cause.

I'm not fighting tigers but the women around me sure are happy when I can carry something alone they struggle to do with three of them. There's a significant difference between a direct display and a bunch of commercialized abstractions. All those abstractions make people forget the value others have. We just so happened to push a lot of those abstractions onto men and the value they tend to bring as men.
The problem with incentivizing sterilization is that you’re essentially abusing power dynamics to coerce vulnerable people into doing something they would otherwise not choose.

You also need to consider that a staggering number of men in prison in the USA for decades were jailed over cannabis, which is now legal in more states all the time. These are not people who we need to sterilize.

Any situation where an authority incentivizes a marginalized individual to be sterilized, there’s a serious problem.
The question is not whether Nim is better than Rust, the questions are:

Does a C++ developer have reasons to switch to Rust

and

Does a C++ developer have reasons to switch to Nim
Neo-Store: An F-Droid client with modern UI and an arsenal of extra features
> Who says that she is? Plenty of women suck at nurturing. Plenty of men are good at it. Why not have both parents capable of providing emotional support and guidance?

You talked about a lot of things but I don't think this forum is best to discuss most of it, but let me reply to that statement.

I did not imply that all women are excellent nurturers or all men are great at being masculine. But whether you believe it is nature or society, parenting is many jobs packed into one. One person has to teach a child how to be masculine or feminine or if you are one of those people inventing thingd the whatever non-masculine/non-feminist thing I guess? But a father teaches his son how to be man, now you take that and make it about some ideologicial/political culture war and that isn't right. What's wrong with a mother providing emotional support? If a father is providing that then is that father also teaching the boy how to be a man? What is the woman doing then? Someone needs to do both jobs. If the mother can do the father's job then so be it. I don't get this obsession with reducing everything into politics or whataboutism. As a child I needed both types of support, to be understood as a male and thaught how to handle myself as well as to be taught how to be kind, caring and intouch with my emotions, to avoid burying them. Women don't have testestrome and society has it such that if you are feminine, you spend most of your life being emotional and being in touch with your feelings, so you're an expert at that.

You talk about what can be and hypotheticals. Ok, if you work hard enough, maybe a woman can teach a boy how to be man and a man can learn how to provide what a mother provides? But why are you talking about that? Why are you insisting that men who only know how to be men and have no interest in becoming women pretend to be something they are not? And if a woman is not great at providing motherly love and support, I say she should talk about it with her spouse and let them figure out the best way to meet the needs of their children. I hope we can at least agree that whatever socio-political winds may prevail, the needs of children should not be neglected.
I kind of detest the sweaty grappling part of it all. It's what turned me off of Krav Maga and MMA. Personally I prefer exercising in solitude, so long distance running and weight lifting.
I would be interested in how CLIP performs post quantization. This should be relatively simple to test via ImageNet zero-shot top-1 acc as one example metric.
> The simple truth is that men handled the vast majority of situations where combat was required

I think you greatly overestimate how much combat people faced during prehistoric times. Population was distributed sparsely, most food was gathered, not hunted, and was abundant, and you don't fight predators to scare them off.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_warfare#Paleolithi...
Is that problematic? I'm guessing it was written in a European language, by someone with a European name, from a European perspective, as a starting point.
1280 SHRES mode and exploiting the fact analog CRT TV wont be able to display this and interpolate down to 160 pixels worth of ~80 colors. The key seems to be bad TV and sitting far away :) Only one bitplane is filled with actual color data, 1280 / 8 = 160, all other bitmaps are prefilled with special patterns, system bus is heavily saturated leaving very little for CPU.

This gave me different idea instead of smearing colors on TV. 2x RP2040 pico. One soldered on top of Hybrid/DAC where it accumulates digital data 8 clocks at a time and automagically translates planar to chunky, second RP2040 playing a role of DAC. Sprites not supported for obvious reason, need all the pixels pushed out to reconstruct flat chunky data. 2x pico because one doesnt have enough pins to fit everything, and fpga/cpld uneconomical in the face of $1 RP2040s.

OCS/ECS Hires 640x @16 colors would produce 320x200@256 with zero performance penalty out of A1000/500.

This is ~how Commodore A2024 monitor worked internally, except 23pin Video Connector had only 4 digital data bits resulting in stupid refresh rate. ~1000x1000 at 10Hz https://bigbookofamigahardware.com/bboah/product.aspx?id=863

Afaik Commodore Akiko chip was so braindead it took chunky data in and translated that into multiple planar writes to ram killing any potential speed advantage.
More than that, the vendor winning the bid will happily use the opportunity to latch itself to the flow of taxpayer money. That's a big reason you end up with XML hell - the systems are designed to make future interop impossible without going through the vendor.

In fact, wasn't Denmark a case study of that? I remember there was someone on HN a while ago, IIRC working in public service of some country in Europe, who posted stories about their constant fighting with a vendor who intentionally makes it very hard to have any kind of integration and data exchange between various administrative branches.
Same reason I didn't invest much in this field yet.

When you access one resource it's fine to a do a roundtrip, but with listing, filtering, searching if you don't join at query time it doesn't work. I'm not entirely sure how they achieve it and I found it annoying that it's never mentioned because it's very common.
I came here to recommend these exact three life changing authors.

Bonus items

Don't Make Me Think - Steve Krug
Information Architecture - Louis Rosenfeld, Peter Morville
Everyone? Python doesn't aim for efficient. C++ doesn't aim for expressive or elegant.
cool, and has to be pretty fast, but it needs attention.

we use proxmox pbs, and just ordinary backups, which are so fast we never even check snapshots
It’s not just objective C but the entire Apple ecosystem that grew up around it is a tangled ball of mess.
Exercise is great for everyone including yourself. It's up to you to exercise. Don't complain when people list the benefits of exercise.
I somewhat doubt that, though he was involved in some of the materials science behind RAM memory.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1449951/what-language-wa...
Longtime lurker here. I am taken aback by the suggestion that Jews have never been rounded up purely for being Jewish. I find this notion historically unfounded and antisemitic.

Your comment broadly argues that killing of one group by another is never done with purity of intention. I submit almost nothing people do is for its own sake, but rather woven within individual and collective stories. To think otherwise is to deny the role narrative plays in human consciousness.

A cursory glance through a list like this one:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pogrom shows numerous examples of massacres of Jews (and others, but mostly Jews). The attackers always claim justifications--again, no group attacks any other group without somehow justifying it to itself, either initially or post-hoc.

1. What about the many massacres of the Jews for rejecting Christianity? Surely those are examples of being rounded up for the sake of being Jewish, since the Jewish religion is incompatible with, for example, the concept of the divinity of Jesus. A key point here is that Judaism is a tribal and not universal religion. Thus, it is hard to divorce attacks on the Jewish religion from attacks on the Jewish people.

2. What about the massacres justified by absurd pretenses, such as (As you mentioned) poisoning wells, corrupting the host (Communion), or the blood libel (That Jews kill Christian children and use their blood to bake Matzo). These justifications, which do not hold up to scrutiny, only work for a population that wants to believe them in the first place. The sheer number of nonsensical justifications points to the underlying fact--there is no justification at all.

3. Need I mention the Holocaust, in which the stated aim of the Nazis was to eliminate the Jewish race? Even those with Jewish ancestry but with no religious practices (and who were not considered Jews by themselves or other Jews) were nonetheless sent to the death camps.

By the way, I have focused on historical violence from the Christian world, but this is not to the exclusion of violence from the Islamic world, of which there has been much as well.

In sum, if there was ever an example of a group persecuted for purely "being themselves", it is the Jews.
You're going to get people here saying "no, it's the same rate for girls, they just mask better"

Well, that ability to mask is exactly what increases their likelihood to be spared from the worst of the pain of being ASD (the negative treatment from others due to inability to mask).

Autism really does hit men harder
Yes, so if we get away from the elevator pitch, Rust provided:

* Cargo for managing dependencies and a sensible module system

* Option/Result based error handling without using null

* Zero (runtime) cost abstractions like iterators and async
Truly a sad day. His Batteries changed the world perhaps as much as nuclear tech did. Rest in Peace Mr. Goodenough. Your inventions will outlive you and perhaps play a crucial part in keeping earth habitable for us. Truly a life well lived.
If we KNEW the future was dystopian, corporations would still race towards it
Here’s another perspective:

A decade ago you could deploy an internal PHP app to a box and forget about it for a few years, then fix a minor bug by sshing in, viming a file, and hacking it a few times.

These days, if you leave the app untouched for six months that 10 minute fix becomes 2 hours of fixing a broken docker build. :)
> Households are either "Barrys Tea" or "Lyons Tea" and people are expected to have a loyal devotion to one and hatred of the other

So if you offer Barry's to a guest who is in the Lyons, are you being rude?
A great thing is when you can mobilize your vulnerability and akwardness to some degree. What’s important if you may decide to say something like dance is to find a community and teachers who are supportive and in a way able to vulnerable as well. So choose “wisely” in that regard.

I did a lot of teaching of yoga and my primary responsibility was giving people space to be that.
That kind of shit is why I hate dealing with people, same thing happens here in Poland but with food. I just started saying "nope, I'm too fat for that"
This is a benefit (non-commercial) FOSS has over software authoring in commercial corporations. Developers get to call the shots, and usually, don't bend to such passing fads.

> I don't even know how I would do it.

Depends on the software you're writing of course, but the core would probably be some libraries with C (and maybe other language) bindings, some command-line executables, and anything else - above that.
There is this small chance that Wagner will undertake the Belarus front towards Kiev.
No, it doesn't.

History, just like nature, is almost completely random and "unfair".
Their standard devkit is too large, their USB dongle has the problem of requiring to be connected to a computer, so I suppose it works better as a dongle than something you could mount on a breadboard.

I tinker with embedded on Rust, and I spend more time on ESP32s than on the various nRF52s that I have. I only saw MakerDiary's boards recently, I hope that this can change.

As an aside, hobbyist programming in a language/platform that isn't well supported has the side effect that you end up spending more time growing trees instead of chopping them for wood.
I'm not sure I believe incarcerated people can make free choices. And I would assume that legislators would push towards harsher and harsher sentences to incentivize prisoners to "choose" sterilization if they ever want to see daylight again.

An incarceration system, if it has any hope of working, must treat prisoners as people who can become valuable members of society in the future despite their past wrongdoing. When you decide that prisoners are a blight on society and that no rehabilitation is possible then prisoners turn into some kind of underclass that is to be disposed of, either directly or indirectly. That's real dark.
Show HN: Connect with investors in minutes not months
If you are not connected in the world of venture capital it can be very difficult to meet with investors. Your best options are to get introductions from people you know or just reach out directly. Unfortunately, the response rate to such outreach is typically very low which means you need to message a lot of investors before getting responses. This can be very time-consuming, in fact, fundraising can consume up to 70% of a founder's time - identifying potential VCs, finding the right people to contact and then crafting a personalised message that gets their attention. Investor Hunter uses AI to automate this process giving you the best chance of getting funding.

It works in 3 simple steps:

1 - Tell us about your startup
Your industry, target market, funding goals, and more. This helps our AI understand your startup better.

2 - Intelligent Matching
Our AI will analyse your startup's profile and match you with the most compatible investors from our vast database of over 100 000 investors.

3 - Automated Introduction
Our AI will then draft a highly personalised introductory email, using persuasive and professional language that reflects your brand, to kick start the conversation.
CQ is instantly recognizable to us, so is SOS even though most of us have never heard over the air. SOS of course would be recognizable to almost anyone whereas CQ requires at least some Morse training.
The brutal truth is that the "pro-dev" is aggregating all these buzz words in the application you are destined to take over. It's not him that will maintain his academic overly enthusiastic code base. Once he has completed his task he will brush some documentation off his shoulder and condescendingly assume that everyone smart and capable shall understand the produce of his loins.

heed the buzz-words. simplify your solution and beware developers incapable of cooperating with the entire team. Predictability and long time consistency equals professionality.
By failing to maintain the population. The richer people get, the fewer children they have. This is the same in countries all over the world. Your intuition is wrong on this one.
Some ways you can contribute to open source software without writing code
> They just assume .0 and .255 are always special.

For me, .0 and .255 were always associated with the first and last address of a block rather than those specific numbers. And thus the network and broadcast address respectively.
> Mearsheimer is not liked, but he predicted this tragedy.
His Mearsheimer:Russia Sees ‘Existential Threat,’ Must Win

>https://peaceworker.org/2022/04/mearsheimer-russia-sees-exis...

When Russia saw an existential threat when Wagner was marching towards Moscow nothing happened.

Russia doesn’t understand appeasement they only understand force.

It’s kinda sad how badly the realists like Mearsheimer have utterly failed to model Russian behaviour.

Giving Russia appeasements in Ukraine would just embolden them to try again.

They must lose decisively.

Any threat of nuclear war from Russia pales in comparison to the threat of future wars when nuclear proliferation goes through the roof, because you can invade whoever you feel and always win with nukes.
Actual Budget: open-source, privacy focused budgeting tool