skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Here is how my country does safe harbor: If you are a website like Hacker News that publishes user-generated data, you are considered a "hosting provider". Hosting providers have no responsibility to check or enforce legality of the user generated content as long as they log the IP addresses of the users for at least 1 year.

This in my opinion is a much neater solution than DMCA.

Citing from the related law:

>ARTICLE 2

>e) Access Provider means real persons or legal entities that provide access to Internet for its users,

>f) Content Provider means real persons or legal entities that create, amend or provide all kinds of information or data presented to users on the Internet,

...

>m) Hosting Provider means real or legal entities that provide or operate systems that host services and content,

...

>ARTICLE 5

>(1) Hosting provider is not obligated to check the content it provides or to investigate whether it is an illegal activity.

>(2) Hosting provider is obliged to remove the content that is against to law if it is notified according to Articles 8 and 9 of this Law.

>(3) Hosting provider is obliged to keep traffic information for the services it provides for a period of not less than one year and not more than two years, to be determined in the regulation, and to ensure the accuracy, integrity and privacy of this information.

...

>ARTICLE 8

>(2) The decision to block access is given by the judge in the case of the investigation and by the court in the case of prosecution. In case of any delay in the investigation, the public prosecutor may also decide to remove the content and/or to block access. In this case, the public prosecutor’s decision shall be submitted to the judge’s approval within twenty-four hours, and the judge shall make his decision within twenty-four hours at the latest. If the decision is not approved within this period, the measure shall be removed immediately by the public prosecutor.

>(3) A copy of the decision to remove the content and/or to block access given by the judge, the court or the public prosecutor shall be sent to the Authority for the further action.

>(4) The decision to remove the content and/or block access to publications whose content constitutes the crimes stated in the first paragraph shall be given ex officio by the President. This decision shall be notified to the relevant content, hosting and access provider and is asked to carry out its requirements.
I've read all the plays, but haven't seen many of them performed. My ranking would be different than his, but that's just how these types of things go. I appreciate the effort.
Ok, and that would definitely not show up as suspicious?
Probably. He'd probably think Russian roulette was a safe game if he survived a round of it.
Debris from sub found 1600 ft from Titanic. “Catastrophic implosion”-Coast Guard
>It's that they're being a jerk.

People define others whose opinions they don't share as "being a jerk" when they're just saying something they don't like, all the time.
To be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal - Henry Kissinger.

yes, WW-3 might be right over the horizon and we all can be bombed out of extinction.. but the world has changed from middle ages.
Adiabatic compression of air to 400 bar increases the absolute temperature by about a factor of 5.5, which would be the temperature of a flame.
Easily dismissed by "the lawyers made us do it" for people who were drawn to the "adventure" of the trip or the allure of the Titanic.
in some cases, it's just cost of doing business
Why not? Rich have no qualms about dehumanizing the poor. And many more of them at that. Because rich are few and poor are many.
its am alternative linux laptop. probably brought up because this crowd mostly looks at framework to put linux on.
Do they have a noscript/basic (x)html portal?

Or a plain and simple C client?
Not everything, just things hooked up to long enough wires to induce significant current. Pretty much just the power grid and the copper communication networks. For instance, I've got a raspberry pi hooked up to some solar panels handling some gardening stuff for me, it'll be just fine.

Editors are irrelevant to that conversation, but people who are accustomed to relying on stacks with many dependencies will definitely find that they struggle more without the internet than people who keep their dependencies minimal. And it's not a cherry picked example, there are all kinds of cases where minimal dependencies = resilience. It doesn't mean you have to go around using punch cards or something, it's really just the emotional attachment to complex tooling that I'm calling out as a hazard here. You end up cultivating skills that are easily invalidated.
It's crazy, isn't it?

I don't know what feels worse for me - that whenever I read a mannered, well-structured and somewhat verbose comment, I now suspect it wasn't authored by a human - or that, as I quickly realized, my own writing style feels eerily similar to ChatGPT output.
You mean 10 million devices that’s the estimate Apple puts. This isn’t Play date or go fund me project
Gotchagotcha, so yeah, to some extent eliminates the time taken to highlight individual brackets at the cost of adding some visual complexity. Thanks.
> Last revision. 7th March 2022

They're running Docusaurus for docs but adding manual timestamps instead of using the built-in showLastUpdateTime variable... this hurts me.
Advancing Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Agreed.

I'd argue it's never been easier to run a legitimate copy of Windows with very few hassles without paying for it. Sure, there's a watermark, but that's it.
Yeah, the title (and the article) doesn't say "than what". If intelligent people take longer to solve complex problems than stupid people, then stupid people are smart and smart people are stupid. But the article doesn't really explain that either.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of various aspects of our lives, often in the form of automation agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs). Advocates argue that these AI agents are the next step towards superior automation, acting as companions to increase our productivity and enrich our lives.
Did you really compare our freeloading shop against one of the biggest software contributors to Linux and supporting ecosystem? RH is a top 5 contributor of patches across the most important core components.
Fatigue failure:

https://community.sw.siemens.com/s/article/what-is-a-sn-curv...
Not everyone wants to play a game where Excel is a requirement.
> being good at math, especially mental math, correlates with aphantasia

as someone who used to do math competitions as a kid, everyone I knew who was "good" at mental math had a good number sense, a big bag of tricks for doing different things with numbers, and practiced with their bag of tricks.
About 15 years ago the (German) company I worked at had a lot of their customers from different industries run on SLES. But over time many customers just weren't willing to sign up for OS support contracts anymore (and also switched from Oracle to MySQL). SLES/openSUSE never managed to get the same support from third parties and communities as CentOS/Fedora. With RHEL 6 we migrated all customers from SLES to CentOS/RHEL. This allowed to have a homogenous environment with and without enterprise support contracts.

We'll have to see where this is going. Certain enterprise software (like Oracle) requires the use of certified operating systems or you lose support. Oracle Linux looks like the more natural choice.
I received one of these letters and nearly tossed it out before noticing the buried lede in the middle of the fourth paragraph indicating that my information had been compromised.
Darling definitely does not support the simulator.
That is a really bad guess...
Nice effort but that's not how carbon fiber fails. It shatters rather than crumples.
What's that got to do with maneuvering for control of extremely-important parts of Linux? If anything, license/attribution fuckery would put you at a disadvantage in that kind of a game. Red Hat was playing for position, not material, in chess terms. Canonical may have held more rights to their competing software, but it doesn't matter a bit, because those projects are irrelevant now. They "own" more, perhaps, but they're in checkmate, so it doesn't matter. Who's looking to pay the best-positioned claimant to "upstart maintainer" for support? Practically nobody, and that's not a growing market.

If you're an enterprise, do you see Canonical/Ubuntu or Red Hat as the most-credible vendor to support Systemd, which both of them are running? Is there anyone else who might hold that title? The answer to those questions are the point of what Red Hat's done (or else they've accidentally achieved a pretty amazing coup through a series of maneuvers that led to that outcome simply by chance, which notion strikes me as unlikely).

What's important is making it extremely expensive to launch or re-position a competitor distro to Red Hat that actually ships substantially-different software than Red Hat does, at a level of polish & reliability that might let you compete with them. It leaves competing distros as Red Hat followers. Which, fine if some hobbyists pick that, what they care about is being perceived as the only credible claimant to the title of first-party vendor of Linux, in most contexts by enterprise.
> For a decade, reddit's message to mods was that this was our community.

I think that era died with Aaron Swartz, which is more than a decade past. In the past decade Reddit admins have been banning thriving communities for not toeing the party line.

Where were you when Reddit banned /r/the_donald and all the lesbian subs? Probably cheering them on for enforcing a political agenda you agree with? Then what made you think you would be spared from the admin's wrath when you turned against them?

It sounds like a typical case of “I can't believe the leopards would eat my face!”

> The fuck? [..] Just wow.

Stop it with the rhetorical pearl clutching. If you have something intelligent to say, make a rational, coherent, dispassionate argument. Nobody benefits from this type of emotional outburst. Imagine I would respond in kind, saying: “Omg! Wow! Wow! Wow! I canNOT belIEVE you would SAY something like this! What the fuck??? Wow! Geez! Golly!" This is just meaningless word vomit.

> Are you seriously comparing state sanctioned violence to a online glorified bulletin board?

Do you seriously not understand what an analogy is?
Anyone know what happens to the body when suddenly exposed to a biblical amount of pressure? I'm morbidly curious about what state the bodies would be in.
That was fun to read, even though I would disagree with much of the article. I generally like the comedies least, the OP likes them most, but it's nice to see people talk about Shakespeare in an article linked here. A couple of comments I would make:

* "People will think I’m crazy, but yes, I’m placing Henry IV above Henry V." I doubt many people would think you're crazy, the Henry IVs are generally considered better and for the reason mentioned: Falstaff.

* On performances of Richard III: "I liked two different performances for different reasons. The 1995 major film puts the play in the World Word II era. It’s solid and does well standing alone. The BBC production has linked casting with the three parts of Henry VI, which allows one to enjoy it in full in its broader context. It’s also well-performed, but obviously has less spectacle and a lower budget." -- you really need to watch the 1955 version for Laurence Olivier's performance.

Also on editions: The Riverside Shakespeare is great. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1036552
> Please, dear Red Hat, just give me a DigitalOcean VM (or something comparable) that costs a few dollars more and has automatic RHEL licensing. Make deals with the VM providers, work something out.

Most of the major clouds have this pre-existing capability to charge more and revenue share the extra through their marketplace services etc; and they're in active use by other vendors. It's often a good source of revenue for both the cloud company and the vendor, and helps the customers by providing them with prebuild solutions that they don't have to build themselves (e.g. web application firewall vendors can/do provide closed source images that customers can use that way). It's not like this is expecting cloud companies to build whole new services from whole cloth just to support Red Hat.
Even as a dyed-in-the-wool Open Source Guy, I give kudos to Microsoft for managing to avoid the pitfalls of it's peers. 25 years ago, everyone seemed to hate the company, but they've done a great job of turning a profit while not alienating developers and operations folks.
How about everyone chip in so that Rocky/Alma can get a subscription to RHEL and get the source that way? The GPL does not say they have to publish the code in the wild just that they have to provide it when they distribute. There are many companies that use OSS, make modifications, and since they never distribute are not required to make that source available.
Interestingly there are no photos or video of Egan publicly available. All we have over the last 30 years is his/her/its textual output. I'm 50/50 on whether "Greg Egan" is in fact a LLM.
The server is running on my local network. It was blocking watching content on my local network from within my local network because it couldn't phone home.

That's broken by design.
I like to test people’s intuition of computer power by asking them how many multiplications their phone or PC can make in the time it takes light to cross the room.

The way to estimate this is that light takes 3ns to go 1m. If the room is 10m wide, that’s 30ns. At typical frequencies that’s 100 clocks. With, say, 8 cores that’s 800 steps. At each step a core can retire about 8 multiplies using AVX vector instructions. The estimate of 6,400 multiplications is actually very conservative because you also have the GPU! Even low end models can put out hundreds of thousands of multiplications in 30ns. High end models can do about a million.

When asked, most people estimate “1 to 10”. Even programmers and IT professionals do not have a mental model of how fast computers really are.
> I think the hope is that Red Hat would care about its own long term profitability.

They are a public corporation. They only care about the short term sheet as that is all investors care about. As long as the stock market punishes long term thinking this is what you will get. Part of me thinks it is by design... that it is easier to make money in the market if you have a steady flow of companies going public then eventually going out of business.
Play is every child's way to learn about the world after all, and it works amazingly well.
I think people are angry when, as others have mentioned, there are more resources and international cooperation going into helping these 5 people who took a needless risk while we watch 100s dying regularly while they try to flee literal war ones in regions we've destabilised for years.

You can also see in this thread people calling them "precious lives" as though that doesn't apply to the people making the ultimate sacrifice to try and bring their families to safety.

I have nothing against people being rich but it's frankly scary to see these refugees be dehumanised, framed as economic immigrants and become victim to to increasing legislation to keep them out of safety on the basis that we can't afford them using our resources when we suddenly have resources enough to spend on extensive missions to search for people who made bad decisions for fun and risked the lives of others for nothing but profit and fame.
So what if the fraud is happening automatically from countries like China/ India on western civilization?

Have some voice generation, phone data from millions of people, data on who's related, a scam trained AI and some crypto wallets and let it run wild.
You’re just looking for outrage where there is none.
Good video. Some excerpts:

"If you're not breaking things, you're not innovating. If you're operating in a known environment as most submersible manufacturers do, they don't break things." (8:49)

"Our rule is we risk capital, we don't risk people." (9:56)

"We used the same prepreg that's used on the 787." (11:15)

And my favorite: "When you're outside the box, it's really hard to tell how far outside the box you really are." (8:30) He does seem to be far outside the box now.

But the most significant quote IMHO is the one about "the same prepreg that's used on the 787". Like they often tell you that phone holders for bikes are made of "aircraft-grade aluminium" (which usually means it's 6061, the most common alloy). It's a strong indication of bullshit -- name dropping that doesn't have anything to do with the subject matter.

In the rest of the presentation he seems nice enough, and truly passionate about deep sea exploration. So maybe he was a cool guy, I don't know. But in the end it's his hubris that killed him and his clients.
Before, there was only client-side. Server-side is opt-in. So all the libraries you used client-side, you can still use client-side by using client-side components
The same way the surface of the earth is a 2D space with finite area and no boundary.
Yeah, this is all solvable if they can increase the resolution enough. That's not really up to Apple though, they're already on the absolute bleeding edge of display technology with the Vision Pro so now they have to wait for the display manufacturers to come up with something better, and get the prices down.
You.com: The AI Search Engine You Control
The article, at least at first, doesn't seem to be concerned with minority rights. It's concerned about institutions necessary to actually maintain a democracy. Things like an independent press, independent judiciary, and election apparatus not unduly influenced by the current party in power. Degrading or getting rid of these things is anti-democratic even if a majority of people want it. A majority of voters can want single-party or even single-person totalitarianism, but that is still anti-democratic. Hitler won elections, too.
Why the USS SCORPION (SSN 589) Was Lost 50 years Ago [pdf]
UPS Discloses Data Breach
To be fair to math symbols, code is read often by programmers, especially programmers of the language you're writing in. For things that get used a lot, short symbols are fine, because everybody reading the code will have seen a lot of the relevant syntax.

Otherwise it would be like asserting that programming would be better if we eschewed all specific jargon. Why say "bit" when we can say "single digit for which there are only 2 possible values"?
This is what I try to impress on anyone who thinks “saving money” on tires is a frugal way of living.
They won’t sell dev kits, only given to very select big co who has has a lot to lose if they break NDA. Mean time use the simulator in xcode15 beta2
They’re trying to acquire a company run by a CEO who is quoted as taking the fun out of games: https://www.escapistmagazine.com/bobby-kotick-wants-to-take-...

MS is just looking for arbitrary fiat economics wins. Big corp just needs us to keep showing up, as its ability to point at how many people were convinced to give up their agency to build their moat makes primates hallucinate big corp is central to literal existence of reality.

It’s not mired in fantasy imagery like religion but modern economics is still social gossip.
Many lives and resources were also involved in the rescue operation.
Show HN: Creative Blog Post Titles and Ideas Generator (Free)
I also just learnt that Medicaid can place a lien on your house in some cases. Maybe, the solution is to move out of US, but that is equally difficult with an Indian passport.
Centralization removes a massive barrier though. We want content, and control over that content, distributed and preserved (usually), but we also want everything in one easy to access location. Having to find out about, sign up for, and separately visit 100+ unique websites running phpBB, vBulletin, or something else, then logging into each site with their own usernames and passwords several times a day is a lot of work. Subscribing to 100+ subreddits and hitting the refresh button on one website was easy and mostly worked pretty well. A single interface/client/login for everything is ideal. What we really need is a new usenet.
> Even programmers and IT professionals have literally not mental model of how fast computers really are.

Or of how slow light is!
I wonder to what degree the hubris causes the wealth. You need a high degree of certainty in yourself and your ideas to succeed in many ventures. I've seen people work their way up organizations who I think are much less competent and thoughtful than I'm, but they at least outwardly present themselves with certainty. Often times people liker that already got promoted away before the downsides of their decisions materialize. In other instances we might never hear about them, because nobody cares about the guy under the freeway bridge who has similar character traits to Elon Musk or Steve Jobs, but got less lucky or was slightly less smart or well connected.
I have to respond to this with a resounding "meh" tbh. ∀ is a pretty unique symbol, it is very readable even if you don't know what it means. Programming forces you to learn new words constantly anyway. It's not like "object instance", "monad", "recursion" or even "while loop" are all that intuitive to beginners yet all programmers learned them anyway. (feel free to ignore any terms you're not familiar with, they're just examples)

∀ might be just as incomprehensible as OOP for a starting programmer, but for anyone taking even a small amount of time to learn it is not difficult at all.
I'd argue containers aren't that good at databases or caches (production ones anyway, fine for development) and containers are specifically targeted at app deployments.

Containers just add overhead for stuff like memcached and complicate database management.
> What is there to keep a food company from lying about the ingredients in their products?

Food companies are not part of the "intelligence community," and there are significant disparities between enforcement of and compliance with the rules that each must follow. To the degree that food companies are even scared of the FDA (and not just willing to risk an inconsequential fine), it's because they know the FDA has strict guidelines and a history of enforcing rule violations that can kill an entire product line.

Whereas the intelligence community is subject to no such oversight, other than some nominal finger wagging by a group of senators (some of whom may even be spied on, blackmailed and coerced by the very agencies they oversee). There is a documented history of the NSA lying directly to congress about the scope and breadth of its surveillance programs, including falsely denying illegal activity. Given that evidence, it seems optimistic, bordering on naive, to trust that law enforcement agencies will respect legislation that restricts their ability to do what they consider to be their job, especially when nobody has been sent to jail for their criminality and deceit.

Why would they bother following the law if there are no consequences to breaking it? It's easier for them to obfuscate and argue semantics than it is to fundamentally alter their methods of intelligence collection.
If what you're doing is getting a math problem correct than I would imagine doing it once correctly is the fastest approach...
Basque - sure, but Finnish and Hungarian? :-) Those were too far away for Romans even to have contacts with them. :)
It's amazing how fast everyone goes from being covid/vaccine experts to {flavor of the week} experts to submersible experts.
Changing the support terms from 10 years to 1 year mid-stream lost them a lot of trust. It's not just what they did, it's how.
There are ways to protect your home from such liens. Enter medicaid asset protection trusts.