skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Say you're a car mechanic and you work at a car shop. The car shop fires you for saying the Moon is made of cheese during a BBQ at a friend's on Saturday, because it's against the nebulous code of conduct.

Now let's say you're a programmer and you like volunteering code to GCC. The project bans you because your beliefs expressed anywhere, including in the privacy of your own home, violate the nebulous code of conduct.

That's the kind of world we're slowly but surely moving towards.
Sure, but the eastern half never adopted Latin to begin with, unlike the West.
I don't think you'll find a service like this without similar terms/policies, unfortunately.

To make the backend work with the auto-scheduling requires that the system knows some personalized heuristics on how to move tasks around. And for that to work means that it'll need to aggregate that data.
As someone who has been on the fence about this for awhile now, thank you for your valuable anecdote!
I mean, this is not a very convincing study.

State dependent learning is a legitimate phenomenon.

This study didn’t test those who regularly took cognitive enhancers
It just looked at people who were not ADHD and then gave them a drug
No time to adjust or adapt
Would have liked to see four populations tested.

1. unmedicated ADHD
2. medicated ADHD
3. Unmedicated non-ADHD
4. Medicated Non-ADHD

Then do the tests with placebos and cognitive enhancers

If you study for a test on medication you better take the test on medication.

And if you study unmedicated, you better take the test unmedicated
I think they should find “non-ADHD” populations who happen to routinely take cognitive enhancers and then perform the same test.

Would be willing to bet that there is an improvement over placebo group vs medicated group in this population

If coffee and nicotine are effective cognitive enhancers for general populations, regardless of ADHD or not, it’s silly to think that stimulants like amphetamines are ineffective

So the research conclusions are flimsy and incomplete
Aha, that would be because I got the url wrong that I just set up. https://aicoding.club/ (and fixed in the message before).

If you get a fasthosts landing page, it's DNS propogation issues. Should be hooked up to 68.183.253.254 (correct on google and cloudflare dns).
Based on a cursory look, it appears largely correct historically. Here are a few pointers on the evolution of the Latin and Brahmi scripts if you'd like to dig in more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Latin_script

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmi_script
Search function on HN? Scroll to the very bottom and there is a search box. It doesn't seem intuitive. It seems like it should be at the top of the page.
I've seen this infographic many times before, and being a huge history buff, I've double checked a bunch of the alphabet/script progressions to see if wikipedia has sources confirming. As far as I can tell, it's pretty accurate.
NJ has overall decent schools that are well funded with huge local control in many areas broken up into an insane number of small towns. The kicker is all children need to have a minimum education regardless of cost - so if an educational plan needs multiple teachers following a student cost is no factor and I don’t think that’s a bad thing. The richer towns subsidize some of the poorer towns as well. I think that if a private school were to get any public funds at all they immediately should also be required to at no extra cost to the sender have the same requirements with out being able to get rid of problem children.
A copy of the first edition (1945) can be browsed at https://archive.org/details/einsteintheoryof032414mbp/mode/2...

Scanning through the 2008 edition (which you can find... elsewhere... like libgen), my favourite part is probably on p. 243 (in both editions, up to the change of pronouns; it's on the Internet Archive's page 256 of 342):

"Is the reader wondering just what we are trying to do to her? Is this a subtle mental torture by which we alternatively frighten and console her? The fact is that we do want to frighten her sufficiently to make her realize the colossal amount of computation that is involved here, and yet to keep up her courage too by the knowledge that it does eventually boil down to a really simple form. She might not appreciate the final simple form if she did not know the labor that produced it. With this apology, we shall now proceed to indicate how the further simplification takes place."

I didn't look much at the special relativity half of the book, but the second half, on general relativity, is a superb introduction and not nearly as old-fashioned as I would have expected. (Some of that is thanks to the editing done by David Derbes and Robert Jantzen for the 2008 edition, who made extensive Editors' Notes at the end of the book. Those notes are themselves superb, and should be read alongside any of the math-heavy later parts of the book.)
This will surely be the first time a CoC changes any community for the better. /s

Nobody cares about a CoC and people will do what they will regardless of what the CoC says.
Of course... or he can say that you could use another resources that is GDPR compliant and/or privacy preserving.

YOU provide the service so YOU are responsible for the way your user's data are processed and must ensure that it's processed according to the rules (requiring consent when necessary)
> Isn't that the problem?

The problem is that the specific phrase "Code of Conduct" has been dragged into a culture war. And if the problem is the parlance, the solution is to just call it something different, like "Conduct Policy", "Rules", or something similar.

It might seem trite, but in my experience using a different name seems to shut off the part of some folks brain who automatically assume said rules will be enforced in bad faith.
I understand that this is attractive for Figma because it broadens their market and allows them to sell developer-specific plans, but honestly, what I need is not so much tools for myself, but for Figma to nudge my designers to make things more easily consumable by engineers. So that means nudging them to specifying a colour and font palette once and defaulting to using and re-using those, with straying from them being an exception. It means getting them to specify how different elements should flow, rather than them all being absolutely positioned at some particular X and Y coordinates. And just in general have them draw the design with tools that work more closely to the way CSS works.

I believe penpot.app is supposed to work like this, but unfortunately I haven't been able to try that yet.
See that's what I love about HN :).

I didn't study physics past A-Level and none of this stuff really came up, what little understanding I have is as an interested bystander (I loved physics at school but wasn't the career for me), if I had multiple life times I'd have loved to have studied it at university though, so much stuff to learn in a short life time.
1. When you say "desirable" here you're speaking relatively. Abortion isn't intrinsically something that the vast majority of women want, what they want is to not be pregnant for one reason or another.

2. Many, many people have middle-of-the-road opinions about abortion. Nudging them into carrying the human to term and giving it up for adoption isn't akin to selling fake services, it's more akin to organ donation.
I once heard of some fancy data science that inferred that the company was the supplier's major customer from the gaps in the sequential ids they saw when using that supplier's API. That was useful in negotiations.

And so the company that did that data science realised they too were susceptible to exactly the same 'attack'. So they created a system to obscure the ids they were themselves exposing to their customers, using some cheap cut-down tea64 encryption iirc. My memory is it never went live, though.
Well you know what they say, if at first you don't succeed, try, try again :)
Fraud has pretty steep punishments already, I'd have thought?
> 2/3rds of AfD supporters claim to be doing it as a protest vote.

You don't vote for proto fascists as a protest vote. Especially not when you're German.
That should only be an issue if the server is under attack.

According to the docs (https://github.com/mCaptcha/mCaptcha/blob/master/docs/CONFIG...), you can set three difficulty levels:

MCAPTCHA_CAPTCHA_AVG_TRAFFIC_DIFFICULTY

MCAPTCHA_CAPTCHA_PEAK_TRAFFIC_DIFFICULTY

MCAPTCHA_CAPTCHA_BROKE_MY_SITE_TRAFFIC_DIFFICULTY

The defaults are set such that avg traffic takes ca 0.02s on an average system. Even if you have a really really slow system, I don’t think you‘ll ever spend more than 2s there.
Eh... fine. People won't come out unscathed in literally all cases.

However the risk from one dose is minimal. If your risk threshold is so close to 0 then we should be banning way more things today.
I also use it to make inflammatory clickbait titles and captions so my posts engage better

Surprisingly helpful mental offload, its better than I would have been
Perhaps not exactly what you are seeking, but here's a webinar we did a few months ago on ClickHouse vs. VictoriaMetrics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCrdp8hIhJM

Disclaimer: I work for Altinity.

Edit: get product name right
A judge can say anything they like, but that doesn't mean it'll be upheld at appeal.

If you can use a local version of an external resource, you should. Minimisation is an integral principle of GDPR. There are plenty of circumstances where it would be impractical or impossible to perform a necessary function without sharing data with third parties, but that still needs to be done with appropriate thought and care.

I would have a great deal of confidence in embedding a resource provided by Stripe; I would have absolutely no confidence in embedding a resource provided by Google.
It may be trivial but costs money at scale - which is the entire point of PoW.
I take it you are supposed to be the dark humor police?
It's not like that, please read the article.

The ads are deceiving people into thinking they are going to an abortion clinic.

Google never banned anti-abortion ads, but they do ban misleading advertising.
You're right, I hadn't thought of that.

I think most phones now can be remotely disabled, right? This article from April says over 90,000 phones were stolen in London UK alone last year: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/mobile-phone-thefts-ro...

I'm sure a bunch of them were iPhones, so it still happens. I guess even if you just sell them for parts there's a lot of value in an iPhone and presumably that will be true for the Vision Pro too.
Small government, too. (by that I mean local)
There’s leadership for you.

Yup, and this was of course the whole point of getting up on a soap box and "calling for" regulation in the first place.

To make sure that at the end of the day, this "regulation" was thoroughly defanged, declawed, and ultimately -- pliable to the company's interest.
I don’t think the goal is to find a single IP for a crime or something. In that case, law enforcement just subpoenas and they’ll sort out the thousands using the IP to the actual person (possible with ISP participation).

I don’t think it’s insane because the more common use is just to pattern match to identify the individuals. While lots of people may share, many do not (eg, everyone in my home shared an external IP but that is frequently just one person).

Google can use this IP and browser traffic to separate out individuals (eg, I don’t watch YouTube and my kid never checks vanguard) to the level they convince advertisers that they know the individual. I expect this is why my kindergartner sees ads for car insurance.
> There's no scenario I can think of where I want swap on a spinning disk.

When you only have spinning disks and you run out of ram.

> What advantage does padding with swap give over leaving some unallocated space?

It allows you to not run out of ram, and it means you get to use the space.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36428107

I'm definitely switch away from Bitwarden.
> Drupal, like GCC proposed rules, allow punishment of someone for something they did outside the community, and not only the guy was punished, an ex girlfriend of his was harassed by "helpful" people

Oh wow. I was undecided about the helpfulness of CoC as sometimes people in the project can become hostile, unstable or passive-aggressive.

But this case is very bad. Seems like CoC opens up ways for character assassination, effectively becoming "rules for the harassment of the outgroup".
> installed Rocky Linux because it was easier, faster and cheaper than procuring RHEL licenses

Thanks, I almost spit my coffee.

Some years ago I read some docs on how exactly RHEL licensing works... guess the team which Oraclised MSFT in 2010 moved to RH.
Crucially, "5" might also be the key to a thousand different records in dozens of other development & QA databases for applications with integrations configured incorrectly. Integers can match coincidentally. UUIDs won't.
The same could be said for anti-vaxx websites appearing first when searching for vaccine information, and creationist websites appearing first when searching for information on natural history. Even if you don't think that the opinion of the respective professional/experts should be boosted over the opinion of people who are primarily not relevant professionals/experts, surely prioritising the the view of the overwhelming majority would be a more reasonable natural stance.
It's very difficult to generalize but I'll chime in with my experience as both.

If I'm working on a backend system and have a (frontend) framework in place, I might easily skip Figma IF I have enough confidence that the approach/pattern/solution is the right one. If not, or if the particular UI is quite challenging, I would usually sketch things out in Figma until I can resolve the most important questions/design challenges. I would not bother making a high-fidelity design in this case.

If I'm working on a highly visual/presentational project, then Figma is my go-to, since code would be super slow and limiting if I want to explore various approaches and ideas. Especially I wanted to be a bit more creative with the presentation. However, I would probably design less than usually needed. Also, when coding this design, I would *not* consider my own Figma project to be a pixel-perfect representation of every single value in terms of font-sizes, spacings, etc. I would use a code-oriented system/approach and make sure everything comes close to the design. Certain details would be tweaked by eye in code as well if I feel they need visual adjustments. I suppose I also intuitively know which areas need more (pixel-perfect) attention and which are flexible.

And then there's exceptions and hybrids to all of these. I may want to polish a particular backend UI piece for whatever reason (Figma-first), or I might want to prototype/create a proof of concept for a complex state management, transitions, etc. (frontend-first) before making portions or all of it pixel perfect in Figma.
In my area this did not happen I’d be surprised if it really was anywhere. Remote as an option has been gone for some time.
> If signing this paper and being stricter helped the hospitals not being saturated and saved x thousands lives do you still think it was a bad thing?

If patriot act helped US intelligence agencies prevent the next 9/11, do you still think it was a bad thing?
> It's not unlikely that democracy in France will not survive LePen.

Not sure what you meant but I would say that it is not likely that democracy in France will survive LePen.

She's just like her dad (or even worse) but much more savvy about the packaging.
On the one hand, a serial base id like https://example.com/user/items/55, seems less secure than a UUID based approach as if all else fails the UUID is still hard to guess. On the other, some systems (github private repos for example), don't seem to worry about how easily a URL can be guessed. Is it perhaps the case that probability of successful attack is not materially reduced in with a hard to guess url in the final analysis?
I always thought ruby is to web projects what python is to data science.
Le Pen is not "as far-right as it gets" and neither is Zemmour.

Melenchon is very left-wing, started as a Trostkist and is good friend Venezuela's Maduro, against the capitalist system, etc. So if you think Le Pen is extreme on one side then Melenchon has to be equally extreme on the other side.
Other variables could have been adjusted (pensions, contributions...). Independent studies showed that our retirement system is very much affordable for our government and will still be 50 years from now. Just today it's also been revealed that the government's plan overestimated its savings by 4B euros...

Are you just repeating a common cliche while not knowing much about the situation?

So yes, unilaterally deciding to raise the retirement age, which doesn't actually fix anything, without having a vote, without listening to the protests, is neither mild nor democratic.
You mean to tell me that they don't wanna hire seniors in your area? Idk the market seems to be looking mainly for senior+.
The elections can be skewed with different kind of manipulation (social media, troll farms, electronic ballot hacks) and the popular candidate can still win.

It's fair to assume Putin would try to influence the elections in trump's favor as he would have been beneficial for him.

The Ukraine invasion would have been much easier if trump had been relelected, finished pulling out of nato and kept the more isolationist policy that was in effect during trump.

IMO trump was also doing a lot of damage to the US and it's position on the world stage which is also beneficial for Putin.
The chart looks fine. I don't know all the scripts, so there could be a contentious arrow or two in it somewhere, but it's broadly correct. The alphabet (in the sense of a writing system that represents the language with a small fixed set of symbols representing sounds) appears to have been invented only once.
As a counter, abortion seems to show up more strongly when searching for anti-abortion. That may be appropriate - and its fine to point out possible bias but I think the article is perhaps not really researching this in an impartial way.
Thanks for bringing this up, I should've read the TCs before moving away from their self-hosted solution.
Dojo aims for 100 exaflops in 2024, ~83x more than current top supercomputer
This is a common misconception. hashids is _not_ an encryption algorithm. It's just an encoding with a tiny bit of obscurity layered in.
hashids.org:

> Do not encode sensitive data. This includes sensitive integers, like numeric passwords or PIN numbers. This is not a true encryption algorithm. There are people that dedicate their lives to cryptography and there are plenty of more appropriate algorithms: bcrypt, md5, aes, sha1, blowfish.
I can successfully say I never enrolled in Prime. I always thought the dark patterns around it were deceptive and deceitful - unfortunately they've gotten away with it for so long and bilked so many people and padded their forward accounting statements for so long with this revenue that I doubt any fine from the FTC has any real teeth to stop them from doing it again.
> Marijuana

Illegal, straight to jail, and morally bad

> Assisted Marijuana

Totally legal and morally good
Google reCAPTCHA v3 has worked pretty well for us, we saw many instances in our logs where v2 was solved by scammers on our site using some automated tools that had a 25% success rate (plenty for automated scammer scripts) but upgrading to v3 stopped all the automated attacks. So far we haven’t seen successful solves of v3 in the wild and we’re a payments company so we see a lot of attempts.
Abortion is not killing, abortion is healthcare. Yes, I realize one's set of values will create disagreement on this, I'm not trying to build consensus here, but can't let such a statement about "killing" go uncommented on.
Gross. No.

The difference there is no deception in suicide prevention.
As you can see in the screenshots in the article, the anti-abortion clinics do pose as abortion clinics, instead of providing the person with facts.

Google had to make an extra label for this saying “provides abortion” and “does not provide abortions” because it is impossible to tell.

I would have no problem with pro life sites showing up that are open about it. When you google “how to kill yourself”, the suicide hotline does not hide behind “5 easy steps to killing yourself”
They knew how the product worked (they used the product) they just did not interact with devs - so they didn't really get the implementation. Their only opinions there were formed from leadership who was very biased with what they wanted to express.
No because suicide and abortion are not comparable.
Abortion is a complex and controversial issue. Google does not have an obligation to only show pro-choice material when searching abortion, because that would be a form of censorship and bias that would violate its own principles of neutrality and diversity. I am not persuaded by your argument that these search results will harm users.
Nobody's ever in urgent need of an anti-abortion.
There are always scissor cases. Suppose X, a Ukrainian says on Twitter "I wish the Russians would get out of Ukraine" and then Y, a Ukrainian of Russian ethnicity reports X for saying that Y shouldn't exist. Who is right in this case, X or Y?

Replace Russia/Ukraine with your favorite contentious issue and you could potentially see communities splitting up over this.
Lack of dev familiarity.
They string you along until its too late to get an abortion, with promises of support, then drop you once the baby exists into a vacuum of support.
apple vision pro isn't an iphone moment

we're still at the apple newton stage

maybe in 10 years we'll be there
>Say you're a car mechanic and you work at a car shop. The car shop fires you for saying the Moon is made of cheese during a BBQ at a friend's on Saturday, because it's against the nebulous code of conduct.

Or maybe we’re slowly but surely moving to a world where the rights of women and minority groups are being slowly eroded after decades of progress, and before long me and all the other gays will be rounded up and sent to conversion camps in Florida run by a newly-nationalised Disney corporation.

I’m gonna guess you don’t find the line of argument in the preceding paragraph super convincing. I feel the same way about what you wrote.
Fear, uncertainty, doubt and delay.
False equivalence.

It's not false equivalence just because you don't like what the comparison says about your stance on an issue.

Pro-life stances are mainly about virtue-signaling anyways.
What does "indirectly" include legally?
The sad part is that this very same can be said about 99% of the laws and regulations that are written. He is 73 years old and listening to him speak I don't think he could figure out how to set the clock on a microwave, much less understand the intricacies of the bleeding edge of the most transformative technology to come about in the last 40 years. I very seriously doubt he knows anything besides what is fed to him by the very companies that are to be regulated. Lobbyists write our laws, congress is just there to collect the money from them and plan their insider stock trades accordingly.
I have a bunch of publicly accessible forms and none of them have captchas.

I did once run into an issue where a signup form was abused by a spammer, but that was a simple fix (tip: in verification emails, do not include any information that the user typed in the form).

If you are careful with your forms, you don't need captchas. Captchas add a lot of friction for some users, so if they can be avoided, they should be.
You're trying to push your morality on everyone. It's fine if you consider abortion to be murder, but the majority doesn't. Google for anti-abortion stuff all you like! But don't make it show up on unrelated searches, if you don't also want the opposite to happen.