skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Is your metal you are using NIST certified and traceable?

How about your welds? One guy, so yours saying he inspected his own work and no sign-off?!

You gonna retain those records?
ASA-100, Distributor Quality System Standard, paragraph 12:
“The distributor shall maintain documentation of traceability for at least 7 years…

Here is a small non-exhaustive list I found of what you need:

Did your shipment meet all the customer’s requirements? Note that this extends to more than just PN, QTY and ship-to. Failure to read and heed those pesky T&Cs (the Terms and Conditions on a typical PO or RO) is a frequent NCR.
Who signed your C of C/Material Cert? Are they authorized to do so (cross checked to the Roster)?
Where was the part obtained from? Are they on the Approved Suppliers List?
Did you send the part to a repair station/AMO? Are they on the Approved Suppliers List?
Whomever you claim to have trace to, is the chain of custody acceptably documented?
Are part numbers, serial numbers, and condition in harmony?
If there were any deviations from what the customer required, was there reasonable documentation in the record showing the customer’s acceptance of the deviation?

https://www.aviationsuppliers.org/the-importance-of-aircraft...

Anyway, good luck with your metal shop business and running parts through the folder-thingy. Please bear in mind that the link I provided is just a small look at the regulations that govern Civil Aircraft and that Mil-Spec is an entirely different beast, but I am sure you know that already!
Starburst Galaxy Warp Speed: Smart Indexing and Caching
I have mixed feelings about Catalyst, but at least it moves in lockstep with iOS advancements/deprecations and isn't holding macOS development back for the sake of backwards compatibility with some obscure thing from 20+ years ago.
Now that I can agree on. Thankfully, md accepts inline html, so you can always just fall back to it for tables if you expect modifications in the future.

Though for the record, you should bee able to escape newlines with a backslash. That admittedly makes the md table into a total disaster, so not suggesting it as an actual option.
hey HN,

This indexing technology autonomously identifies and caches the most used or most relevant data based on usage patterns, while the rest of the data remains close to the source, optimizing queries against your data lake.

Basically it handles the most resource-intensive query operator - ScanFilterProject - for you!

Check it out and let us know what you think.
> Would you allow your neighbor to do a controlled burn of leaves in their yard

Yes, this is extremely common in the south east.
>Why do you go directly to the extreme implementation

> We also shouldn't let the lowest common denominator have a say in the direction of society.

I guess it's human nature, I don't know.
> We also shouldn't let the lowest common denominator have a say in the direction of society.

Interesting. Do you see this as defending democracy?
I think this is just the tip of the iceberg.

As synthetic meat gets more attention, more strict evaluations of its carbon footprint will start to pop up, and me might see what’s actually true —- past the hype, i mean.
Is that really all that is happening though?

There is a trend that glorifies native populations over colonizers and it has been going on for years now, said trend is pretty often just thinly veiled racism. I don't think it's insecurity as much as awareness.
How to Improve Your API Reliability
Ask HN: How Large Languge Models Work?
I am looking for technical descriptions how LLM works for:

a. non-tech people,

b. programmers, who are not familiar with ML/AI,

c. programmers, who are familiar with the basics of ML/AI.

Could you share URLs, please?
I recall an article from a few years ago about a guy in the Mission in SF and his entire job was being the "accountant" for his guild - and he talked about he never logs into the game, just manages the resources of the guild via excel.

And yes, if you never seen Shkreli do exccel, youll be very impressed.
>HUNDREDS

Around 6,000 actually, according to Google.
And even then. If you buy a carbon bike second hand (which I would advise against) you'll have to do an absolutely minute inspection to ensure there are no cracks, especially the front fork and all the places where there are inserts are excellent spots for hairline cracks to develop.
> because it's really amazing on the timeframes and liability frameworks that govern industrial decision-making

Small but critical detail.
Remember that fun is relative. I've had great times in EVE. Probably the most impactful video game I've played because of the community and social aspects.
The argument seems to be that livestock only eats stuff that would have been grown anyway and therefore has no effect on CO2 emissions. But I think this is wrong for two reasons:

1. The premise is false. Quite a lot of farmland is devoted to growing feed grains. See https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/corn-and-other-feed-gr... If we had less livestock, we could either grow human-edible crops instead (with much less energy per calorie expended) or leave these fields fallow.

2. It ignores the fact that some livestock (cows) converts feed into methane, which has a disproportionate climate impact—more methane than if the same grain had been produced, but not consumed by a cow. Admittedly, this is less relevant when we're talking about lab-grown chicken meat. But GP's point was about livestock generally, so this is worth considering.
I'm thinking of running outdoor Axis cameras. Do you have any advice or links on how to route these safely, including grounding and surge protection? Mine will be mounting on the roof soffit.
Oh, this is pretty awesome. It looks like these old scifi browser games.

I often use exotic frameworks like TuiCss (DOS-like) and 98.css (Windows 98-like) for private projects and this framework looks perfect for it-security projects with clichéd 80s flair.. or a low-quality sci-fi mobile game.
It's just culinary cargo cult. You grind pepper and other such things because the flavor survives well in the peppercorn but degrades relatively rapidly in air, so waiting until the last minute to grind it results in better flavor. Oxidized pepper is easy to notice the difference in flavor profile and much lower complexity. Especially the pepper shakers that have been sitting at the restaurant table probably yea verily these many years, mostly unused.

Therefore, grinding things at the last minute makes them taste better, goes the simplification.

Therefore, grinding salt must make it taste better.

But salt is not like the aromatic flavors in a peppercorn. Salt is geologically stable. NaCl itself does not need a last minute grind to retain its salty flavors. NaCl is not a chemically complex flavor.

I qualified that as NaCl specifically because it is faintly possible some of the fancy salts could have their fancy flavors come out better if they are ground, but I'm yet to even notice a difference when any of these are used in food in any manner so I can't judge. Those flavors must be awfully darned stable as it is if they're still hanging around in a 99+% NaCl environment. I'd want to see a specific chemical that can survive that but will suddenly wilt if exposed to oxygen. (We're sure not talking about traditional benzene-ring aromatics at that point!) If there is a difference it is hovering at the very bottom of human detectability.

Salt grinders are annoying. They're hard to use because you're trying to grind a rock, a soft rock sure but still a rock. It's wasted effort, and it occurs to me to wonder if they even do anything to speak of; now I want to find one and compare the before and after of the chunk size; I find myself suspicious that many of them are just theatrics and the salt basically passes through unscathed because "cheap plastic" and "grinding a rock" are not compatible with each other. Even if it does do some real grinding it's still a waste though because it was never necessary, you could just have bought it at the right grain size.
James Cameron understood OceanGate's critical flaw with this one weird trick
Definitely agree with the top part, however, I should note that, ops, the tool's, whole existence is to create disk images and upload them to any cloud, any hypervisor.

In particular, both https://ops.city && https://nanos.org are Go unikernels running on GCP and their deploys take just a few seconds to push out. AWS can be even faster cause we skip the s3 upload part. We also have lots of people using Azure which would be utilizing vhdx.
The punishment isn’t just the $5,000, it’s the public shaming that came with it. You’re not going to be able anyone’s name here for many years without this case coming up. The world at large has been watching this unfold gleefully.

That, combined with the lawyers involved having decades-long clean slates, as well as this case being outside the normal realm this team would operate in, as well as ChatGPT being relatively new at the time this happened makes it all seem pretty proportional.

Maybe you could say they deserve worse for how they handled things after they got caught, but I struggle to really have a problem with this punishment considering the records of those involved.
They didn't know it could lie?

But also, pretty sure Doctors and Lawyers are among the least trusted/highest corruption professions. All that schooling is a barrier to entry to keep outsiders away, it doesnt guarantee competence. Basically once you get in, graduation rates are close to 100%.
that is definitely false, it may be the most convenient way, but please stop with the complete nonsense.

How exactly does it work? can i not call a regular number? can i not go knock on their door? in what way has society changed in those places that completely eliminates the options that existed in 1980?

edit:
and even if we accept your premise, how did this come to be?
I played it from 2017 to 2019, was part of the TAPI alliance. It was fun doing content roaming around Provi/Catch and fighting Goons, my corp at one point decided we should all move to a wormhole and try to live there. It was very good because it was a break from the routine that we had which we pretty much were "F1 monkeys" (always following the order to shoot specific ships from the fleet commander).

My corp was awesome and after I stopped playing (at the start of World War Bee 2), I saw that some of my corpies stopped as well. I had just skilled my main character to fly a capital ship and I wanted to try ratting (sort-of idle PvE content) with it, but lots of things happened and I kinda didn't have time nor money to spend on the game. I only managed to pay for the subscription with ingame money once. I tried to get into industry as I found it interesting, and wanted to build some tools to help fellow industry mates at the alliance, but never got to build them.

Planetary interaction also looked nice, as you had to plan out a setup and you needed different planets to produce the components that would result in higher profits.

It was fun playing, but now I remember one of the reasons I lost interest in it was that it got bought by Pearl Abyss and suddenly a few months later they announced lootboxes inside the game and kinda made it more P2W than what it already was.
So your answer is "we'll just manipulate people without them noticing"?

How will that not backfire?

> People that "would go to war" over the fact that they should eat less red meat are not exactly of sound mind.

I see nothing in their position that indicates they aren't of sound mind. They're inconvenient to your own position, and you're willing to manipulate them if you can manage the trick.

Maybe you're worried that they will choose to "go to war" as manipulated people do so often once aware of the ruse?
OpenAI PPUs: How OpenAI's unique equity compensation works
I'm not entirely sure whether you're joking
>Gosh, why can't people just listen and accept other people's thoughts. Why must we learn individually?

Because other people's thoughts are usually wrong so you cant trust them.
>It takes coaxing (and some cherry-picking) to get anything creative out of LLMs

I assume by LLMs you actually mean "ChatGPT and similar commercial LLM services". Raw LLMs like LLaMA and Falcon will happily spout out the craziest, sometimes super creative ideas, it's just the lobotomising of ChatGPT and the like that destroys their creativity.
no, no, and no. Lets see if we can petition Microsoft to add them, and then we'll see if Win2000 still runs decently fast on a P4 with 4gb of ram.

My guess is: yes, it will.

Somehow, in the past 15 years, "progress" seems to include "software keeps getting noticeably worse, but anyone pointing this out has to be shot down because progress."
> Even worse is the new trend of web pages optimizing for page load time

I don't disagree with your example, but optimising for page load time is as old as the graphical Web.
"the study in question has not yet been peer-reviewed"

So, nothing to see here ... yet.
All the same case.
Nice yeah I suppose I would use format vtt and then convert that to text e.g. with [1]

mods is a CLI interface to GPT-4 [2]

[1] https://webvtt-py.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

[2] https://github.com/charmbracelet/mods
Every activity and product has a cost and contributes to waste. If I enjoy that food and pay for the cost then whats the problem? Are we suggesting it's virtuous for its own sake to have a lower standard of living?
Iron is one of the most abundant elements on earth, but also we aren't going to be burning it like we do fuels now. Instead we would produce pure iron using green power and oxidize it back to it's natural state for energy in a cycle.

Imagine loading an iron rod into your car, driving for a while, and then when you get into the gas station you dump a pile of rust off and buy a fresh iron bar.
The vote (for president) still came down to, "Guy who thinks protecting the workers is the end of the world" or "Lady who seems way too comfortable with actual nazi parties", so americans just had a lot of empathy.
Sure you could use renewables to make iron. But that thought process also extends to other methods too. You could use renewables to make other non renewable fuels.

Why not just skip the middleman? Use renewables?
you are simply 100% unable to get a doctors appointment if you dont have whatsapp? i dont believe it.

Well i guess it sucks to need an ambulance when whatsapp has its maintenance window, guess people will just have to die
Had diner with Tom once and realized how … unaccomplished I was. The guy is amazingly smart and kind, maybe one day I’ll grow up to be like him ;)
Every climate solution I've seen that started with the word "just" has been woefully inadequate, and modestly raising the price of meat is no exception. People would still eat plenty of it.
True. The field of weight loss was so full of bullshit for all the time since William Howard Taft invented it that people just can't believe this time is different - but that will change. Yes, it is an actual scientific fact that before semaglutide, only treatment for weight loss that could pass a clinical trial, was stomach surgery, plus a couple pills from 1980s that turned people into pathetic drug addicts and destroyed their health in several ways at once. So i understand why people are sceptical: WHOLE of this multibillion dollar industry that worldwide, employs millions of people, some of them intentional, criminal charlatans, as well as many more who are just delusional and believe their BS works, WHOLE of it was a scam. What's happening now is a true "creative destruction" as they are all going to lose their jobs, fast.

Effects will be so profound i'm even afraid it can alone result in a recession and social strife: people lose their jobs, healthcare loses their incomes as people become healthier not being obese -> jobs are lost there too, plus those same people will now have a lot of energy and losing their incomes, will have enough vim to rebel. It can be a turbulent time when glp-1 agonists enter mass market!
not sure how long it's going to take to get there but I think unikernels/library OS are the future. cloud computing is moving in the direction of lots of small tasks running in strong isolation and communicating over the network instead of via IPC and shared memory. there's a lot of surface area in traditional operating systems that is completely unused by most modern applications and just sits there consuming cycles and waiting to be attacked.

it’s the tooling that’s lacking now. Whoever gets it right could make a lot of money.
> I’m curious how other vegetarians and vegans feel about eating lab-grown meat?

Focusing only on the opinions about other people: eventually, there is going to be less meat. They're going to get less of this physiologically delightful thing. It's inevitable.

For like 4-8% of the population, like me, they don't need the delight of meat. Fine. But that still leaves 92% who eat meat as long as it is possible to do so. It will be interesting to see how many people become vegan not because of any moral reason, but because it helps them e.g. cope with extraordinarily high prices.
Tor Browser 12.5 is released
This is sick. I wish I had a usecase for using it.
Why? It's his company, his code, his decisions. You are free to use whatever you want for your own projects.
But also don't underestimate how huge it would be if we could store energy efficiently as elemental iron. E.g., produce it using solar, burn it for grid energy. Of course that depends on the efficiency of the whole process.
The submersibles need to be less dense than water on average so they rise when you release ballast.

It's always a cost tradeoff - I think Challenger Deep (Cameron's former sub) was steel construction which required a large volume of syntactic foam that can resist high pressures to counteract the weight of the steel. That makes for a much larger vessel.

Titan's submersible for exploring the Mariana Trench I believe is largely titanium so much lighter than steel, but at a hugely increased cost.
They in fact did say somewhere that they carry 'a couple of spares'.
and its impossible to show up at the office of whomever manages that? to grab a phone and call someone?
Historically speaking, hillsides and mountains are awkward for both homes and combine harvesters. Such land is currently where pasturing is most common.

But such things are always conditional and depend on the tech. If Boston Dynamics robots start building the houses, or picking fruit and herbs on hillside orchards, such concerns probably stops mattering.
Memento: time travel for the web (2009)
This makes no sense to me.

Iron/steel production is one of the largest individual sources of co2 emissions and uses a lot of energy.

And then to just burn it back into iron ore for energy - At best you'll only get back the energy you expended to refine it in the first place.

Assuming they are burning scrap, it would surely be better to melt it down and recycle it as steel.

As energy storage, it may well have more energy per liter than gasoline, but it weighs many times more. There are surely better options - even in the same category, eg aluminium?
This is an expected result if you extrapolate from an early R&D stage process to a global scale, but it doesn’t mean that it’s not worth pursuing more sustainable routes to the mass production of animal muscle.

And that’s really what the underlying goal is here - don’t fall for the false dichotomy of “farmed” vs “lab-grown” - factory farms are essentially process development labs. How efficiently can you convert land and feedstock into salable whole-cut animal muscle? The animals are just bioreactors at this point, with experiments being done on how to optimize feedstock conversion to fatty muscle mass, which antibiotics limit contamination and yield loss the best, etc.

The only question is how animal-like will the eventual bioreactors in the cultivated meat process have to look to reproduce the real thing at scale and at lower cost? The lines will only continue to blur.
Cleaner? Yes.
easier? No.

Also note that you haven't actually done the same as my example.

You're missing <thead> and <tbody>
I blame a lack of access to pitchforks.
See https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.57... - Page 2, the judge uses the very words "doubled down": "But if the matter had ended with Respondents coming clean about their actions shortly after they received the defendant’s March 15 brief questioning the existence of the cases, or after they reviewed the Court’s Orders of April 11 and 12 requiring production of the cases, the record now would look quite different. Instead, the individual Respondents doubled down and did not begin to dribble out the truth until May 25, after the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why one of the individual Respondents ought not be sanctioned."
Imagine thinking that a material stars can't use for fuel is one that makes sense as a "renewable energy source." These idiots need to go back and take undergraduate thermodynamics.
>Where is this doubling down? It certainly isn't in this article

It is mentioned also in the article:

>then continued to stand by the fake opinions after judicial orders called their existence into question.”
Love it and great work. Looks cool to me
Uh... no? Letting them do it in their yard, fine. You do it against my fence, and you will get yelled at. It gets out of control and hits my property, you will be paying to fix it. That is, ultimately, the crux of the problem here.

Literally, the point is they are building a fund so that prescribed burning can be insured.

Edit: I should say that I'm playing loose here, as this is a conversation, not a debate. That said, I did include the "against your fence" on purpose. I'm well aware of rules on how you can burn, for example: https://www.cobbcounty.org/fire/fire-marshal/outdoor-burning.
Temporarily reading into RAM and applying a regex isn’t the same as feeding your repos to a LLM, which may store parts of it permanently.

Obviously GitHub can read my repos in order to display them on GitHub.com, but access must be fleeting.
> If the world adopted a plant-based diet we would reduce global agricultural land use from 4 to 1 billion hectares https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets

All of this is `fighting the last war'. World population is going to fall precipitously by the end of the century.

The scarcity thinking everyone is parroting is a relic of the 20th century and it gets in our way. It keeps us from thinking about creating abundance.
So another comment says that CSS Tweening makes your lib obsolete, which I don't think is true, but,

Can Anime.js make use of CSS Tweening on browsers that support it? Maybe as an optimization, rather than using requestAnimationFrame, on some kinds of animations
Patterns of data flow in words
Econometric Tools Ignore Climate Science
How to build an ecosystem (2017)
Because it wasn't just a simple mistake. It was such egregious professional negligence that it calls into question not only the basic competence of the attorney, but also their basic sense of ethics.
What's the ultimate purpose? To subsist using the minimal amount of resources? Have you considered that people may want to eat animals?

Every human activity consumes resources. We cannot make the reduction of consumption as a goal in itself. At the end of the road, what that line of thinking leads to is just existing for the mere fact of existing while occupying the minimal space and feeding ourselves enough to meet our required daily values. I do not think that is an existence that makes sense.

Going back to "agricultural land use". Much of the land use for raising animals would not become a lush forest if left alone. There's a reason it is being used for animals and not crops.