skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
WASM had some neat/gross implications for blackbox CRUD apps without having to show source. Some people might even start embedding secrets in web source code again!
Islam is the most practiced religion in Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Albania, but alcohol is widely available and consumed in those countries.
It's not a violation, because every RHEL user is a customer, which has access to the source code.
They can't sue you for redistribution, but they can ban your account for breaking their T&C.
> and so must be hiding that they can do so

I don't believe I said that. You can draw your own conclusion from the fact that it is within their capabilities to detect, localize, and to some extent classify a wide range of sources in this region of the ocean.

What you won't find is a lot of information about those capabilities in the public domain. Just consider that what _is_ known tells us that we had these capabilities in the 1950s, and that they were continuously improved upon throughout the cold war. This is not Area 51 conspiracy speculation; it is bread-and-butter NRL stuff that is more than half a century old at this point and is classified for good reasons.
Each square of the board doesn't even need a byte, only a nibble. There are 6 piece types so that fits in 3 bits, plus one for color. If you pack two of those nibbles per byte then you can do it in 32 bytes plus the castling and en passant bits.

Video Chess uses the lower nibble of 64 bytes for the board, and the upper bits of those for various other purposes.

You actually could condense further than that. Build the storage as an array of pieces rather than squares, so 32 storage locations. Each of those locations needs only 6 bits to indicate that piece's current square. (And even only 5 bits per bishop, although pawns need three more bits each to handle promotion and to which piece type.) Of course, writing an engine for that data structure is much more cumbersome, since it can't look at a square to find what piece is on it, instead it has to iterate over all the pieces to find out what's on a square.
> I’m not gonna say it’s gonna replace every use case; it’s clearly not. But for certain high-performance latency-sensitive use cases like trying to deliver feature flags globally to mobile apps, or web apps around the world (that is our use case)… it’s definitely very applicable to this problem

Behind the clickbait headline, a much narrower and reasonable claim.
I use a combination of cron(for the `default` mode that you have mentioned) and a tool that I built for fun(https://github.com/RS2007/recurring-planner) for template days. Let me know if this works for you, happy to add more features to it according to user consensus.
(PS: I just built it a couple of months ago, so there are some bugs. Also I haven't submitted a privacy policy for google to verify(since I am using google auth), so if you wanna try it, you can share your email and I will add you to the list of test users)
> The ones I was in, asked what to do ON reddit, and I personally saw subreddits vote to go private.

This has been my experience too.
Can you explain the "point"?
No effect for them as far as Workspace goes. If they domain was bought from Domains, it will move to Squarespace, but they will only bill the renewals not the Workspace.
Did all of that for more than 30 years now (ok, there weren’t any groups back then). Didn‘t help much I think. Ok for me - i did what i wanted to do - but perhaps government should start to do something too?
"not completely unreasonable" does a lot of heavy lifting here. I have zero intuition how the sound of an under water explosion of c4 compares to an implosion.
Usually just by concatenating the final hidden states (before any classifier/regression/image output head)
> chosen every second Year by the People of the several States
Mmmm don't think so, no. They solve entirely different problems. I also don't think containers will be around in 2030, there will be more fleshed out OS-supplied facilities for general purpose sandboxing I'd think.

Title is clickbait anyway, and such blatant and Shameless clickbait at that.
> How is this any different from farm machinery 200 years ago or industrial automation 50 years ago? More production with far less people.

The skill gap for in-demand labor was less back then. For instance, when farm machinery took off, unskilled farm labor could shift (at massive scale) into unskilled factory work.

You're not going to have a massive shift of low-end or midrange labor into high-end ML jobs. A lot (most?) people are just plain not capable of that. These technologies just kick a bunch of people down then pull of the ladder. Poverty, precarity, and inequality will increase. It'll be great for the ultra-wealthy, who will be able to keep more money (power) in their own pockets without sharing with the plebs.

But who knows, maybe that concentration of elite power will open up promising opportunities in the entertainment industry for the plebs to play squid games.
Extremely expensive guiding services are not a new thing. And the degree of risk is often proportional to expense. So, rich people paying a lot of money to a guide service for the chance to risk their life is not new.

More importantly, my critique isn't about the degree of informed consent to risk. It's about competent guiding and professionalism.

Don't get me wrong: guiding people on dangerous objectives is fine. Good guides die. Clients die in circumstances that are truly accidental where there is no blame to assign, or where the client deserves the blame. That's not my critique.

But if your client dies because you use el cheapo carabiners that failed cyclic load tests or weren't certified for the application, then that would be completely inexcusable incompetence.

My critique is about incompetence, not failure to inform about risk. guides are paid both for the equipment/outfitting and also for the guiding. Being incompetent in a guiding setting is, at the very absolute least, an immoral failure to provide the goods for which you've been paid.

Again, this isn' just one internet guy's opinion. Guiding is now a mature profession, and the conduct of OceanGate runs afoul of ethical guiding conduct. And, again, the issue isn't about informed risk.

> This isn't some student loan for a degree in fortune telling an 18 year old was scammed into

Suleman Dawood was 19.
I think aluminum is much better understood as having effectively no endurance fatigue limit [0] in that its threshold keeps dropping as the cycles progress.

It's expected for cracks to form in aluminum parts of such planes, IIRC they're X-Ray'd on a schedule to discover cracks and replace the relevant parts.

I don't know if CF is expected to behave similarly. You certainly don't see it as an obvious quality of CF bicycle frames, as is visible with aluminum frames. The aluminum bikes have such thick beefy tubes and harsh/rigid ride quality to eliminate crack-forming cyclic stresses. CF bikes are considered more comfortable since they don't have to prevent all the flex, as well as being lighter.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S-N_curves.PNG
Again, my brain is broken because you mentioned "Trillion dollar COMPANIES," who certainly know the value of Linux, even if a lot of people don't.
Yeah, this is my understanding also. I don't understand how this is better than the publisher signing the content with their own key though, rather than relying on a special microphone.

I wish the article was more clear on what threat model they're trying to address.
I think you're off by a couple of decades. The propaganda blitz got underway in the 30's. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_J._Anslinger for example, or consider Prohibition (of the highly toxic and dangerous consciousness altering substance alcohol.)
Would it be possible to share your tests and results?
Collier gives his answer to that here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyXCWYqpId4&t=836s and it seems to be yes for him, without giving any details why(!)

I would say it makes sense - perfect pitch or not - every key has a different relationship to your own voice, which makes it feel different.
Sure, he's hypocritical as hell. But so are the vast majority of newspapers who go to court over freedom of the press yet don't publish commentary critical of themselves. I'm just saying that some of this is a "legitimate" form of hypocrisy.
Am I the only one who doesn't see an obvious difference in the quality between the left and right photos? (Maybe the wolf one) And these are extremely-curated examples!
It seems to work great for 2D control where it works similar to a mouse or a touchscreen. But for 3D control outside floating screens it is a bit unclear whether it can compete with a proper 3D controller.
> migrate to another platform

I don't think this is the biggest threat. Twitter, being a unitary platform, mainly has to worry about other platforms, or protocols that masquerade as single platforms.

But Reddit is built up of many communities. The 17 years of history is pretty valuable to Reddit, Inc, of course. Lots of long-tail search eyeballs. But the people actually generating that valuable information are generally focused on the latest discussion, not the history. I think the threat here is the various communities going other places. One by one or in pieces, scattered across many sites and tools.

As a proof of concept here, look at patriots.win, birthed from /r/The_Donald: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/The_Donald#Patriots.win

It's just not that hard to set up an online forum. Reddit captured those many communities because it was even easier, and because Reddit Inc acted as good stewards. We'll see how this plays out, but I could easily see Reddit being permanently diminished due to its execs unintentionally triggering an open-web rebirth of the independent forum.
A $113m seed round is unprecedented. This just goes to show that if you're super well-connected, all the doors open up for you.
It seems intuitive since ReLU is just a type of implicit regularization. Why would subsequent gradient descent help once you've achieved the benefit of throwing away the "outliers" or data beyond the threshold you want?
> I haven't seen a single video detailing side by side how necessary the third party apps are. Just claims that everyone needs them and uses them.

"Third party apps" also includes bots, like for moderation, which I think is the main issue I've seen discussed besides the various manual mod tools of reddit apps themselves.
Vernor Vinge has dominated the Singularity space in science fiction pretty much from the beginning of the concept.

Rainbow’s End plays around in time frame right around where we are now, just a bit before the sorts of doglegs we predict would presage a Singularity in your lifetime.

At one point the protagonists need to attack a bad actor, and to make it work they need chaos on the internet. I don’t recall exactly how this plays out, but the way they decide to achieve it is that one of the collaborators believes that they can reject a CA cert that affects 10% of all certificates in the wild, and the resulting pandemonium will give them approximately the sort of chaos they need.

Sounds to me like maybe that is either no longer true, or never was.
> It's unclear to me why they didn't migrate everyone over to GCP Cloud Domains.

Doesn't that require a GCP account? There are a lot of minimally-technical users who would be very confused going into a big cloud console, dealing with projects and IAM and all that stuff, just to renew their domain. They will have no trouble dealing with Squarespace.
IPv6 doesn’t address disambiguating people using public computers at places like Internet cafes.
I used to sneak a book and a flashlight into bed and surreptitiously read.

Was I a book addict? Are there 12 step programs for that?

I don't recall similar concerns, but parenting back then was a lot less hands-on.
What would that have to do with anything?
> I am having a hard time understanding why this is a useful way of thinking about equity investment. In the most common case i.e. in secondary markets, you aren't giving the company any money by buying stock. And in the most common case you don't want the company to return the money.

I don’t know how well this translates to different people with different approaches to life and investing styles, but here’s my thoughts on it.

If you want to start with first principles and understand how to invest, you need a foundational model to start building theory on.

Modeling investing as a loan made to a company where the company can choose to not return money at all comes with all sorts of nice properties. The first question you ask is “if I give them money, will they eventually be able to return it?” which will make you look into their business and figure out how much money they need to make to pay you back and when they can pay you back and who else they need to pay back and ultimately how much paying everyone back will cost them. Share buybacks then look a lot like companies paying back some investors and dividends look a lot like interest payments. This is fits very cleanly into all sorts of other models we have today.

Take a look at a plot of number of outstanding apple shares over the past 15 years. It’s abundantly clear that they’ve been “paying back” consistently over time. If that were a person looking to borrow money, you would happily lend money to them!

Take a look at American Airlines. They have a monumental amount of corporate debt and then they need to pay $10B back to all share holders. They were “paying back” their share holders at a steady clip until around covid and then they had to “borrow” more from investors and doesn’t look like they’re ready to go back to “paying” back just yet.

Obviously these are very unsophisticated models. But as a simple approximation, they work really well (for me).

If I were to go to a VC and “borrow” money from them, it’s very helpful to think about how much I can pay them back - it’s super easy to model that like borrowing any other amount of money.

And ultimately, it really does function as a loan from the investor’s perspective. You give away money to an entity expecting to get back that amount and then more. If that entity goes broke, you will not get your money back. If that entity does really really well, they can pay you back a lot more money and so on.
I actually believe this is one of the reasons Reddit (and its alternatives) will never reach their peaks again. Too many want to take, not many want to give their valuable information.

What this essentially boils down to, is AI will then process everything easily accessible and "low quality" (your tech purchase recommendations for example), and everything more valuable will be locked behind communities that invest resources into creating barriers to entry.

This isn't new of course, Patreon is an example of this. Discord also has private channels too, to indicate this is a common pattern that will only increase. Reddit knows this as well, hence their rushed attempts at locking down access.

Basically, get used to having to put in work for information you want and can't find through chatbots!
2. Good. Are those events even worth keeping alive, if you need to get drunk to endure them? Something better will take their place.

3. Someone who feels pressured to drink at these would disagree. Especially someone who tries to limit their intake.
Stack Overflow's Architecture: a multi-tenant, on-prem, monolithic app
In this case they are probably just keeping a record of the fact you have a sealed record.
Sounds like a poor man's reinvention of Maslow's pyramid, with fewer levels.
Composite submersibles: Under pressure in deep, deep waters (2017)
Well, it's not perfect, but it's probably the best we have.

The adversarial trial format process assumes (hopes) that:

1. Both sides have competent lawyers that are doing the same thing

2. The judge prevents lawyers from going outside the rules

3. The jury is competent and is putting forth an honest effort

4. If misconduct is discovered after the fact there are avenues to a retrial (appeal, etc)

We can look at many times where this system went horribly wrong. However I think it's fairly close to the best that can be hoped for. When all parties are competent and well-intentioned (not always the case, sadly) it is probably one of the strongest links in the legal system.
Similarly, a man was once asked by a neuroscientist whether or not he was a psychopath, and his response was identical.

Thankfully, not much later, he was imprisoned for life.
The sensual elegance of flowers–up close
I've been thinking about this problem.

Would an iPod glued to the inside that played yellow Submarine by the Beatles.

At what range would that be detectable? How long could it last?

Edit: even better this banger on loop https://youtu.be/uzR5jM9UeJA
I wonder how big of a debris field such a small submarine could leave?
Is it really that hard for someone who browses hackernews to get set up on a federated platform? I'm over here assuming that everyone on this forum that complains about how hard it is to run a startup should be able to run the docker compose and route a reverse proxy to their own instance, rather than take the 5 minutes to read about how the fediverse and activity pub works and find an instance they like offering free access.

I get that it is not a ubiquitous solution, but after my experiences on mastodon.social and others, I'm really starting to wonder just how genuine the sentiment behind "it's hard to sign up" is. It's not that hard at all - I have found it a lot easier than doing something like creating a modern facebook or google account for instance.
Only when written, of course.

In Italian the written letters ce and ci are pronounced with a soft c.

There are plenty of words with a hard c (a k) followed by an e or an i. Italian alphabet doesn't have a k character so those sounds are written as che and chi. That is, in Italian ch is the k sound. Most (all?) of the other languages of the area use ch for a soft c.
They are off limit to the public, but if at one time they werent then lexis scooped them up.
As a Fedora user, I like this. People who want to use RHEL should pay and there should be no way around that so I can use my Fedora for free. Good job!
Heavy. Huge. Expensive. Complex. Prone to failure.

Basically like any design-by-committee output.
Probably not. We have virtual machine runtimes which are more secure and more generic than containers, but we still use containers because they are much more efficient. WebAssembly provides only some of the goodies of VMs while taking away most of the efficiency of containers... they have their use, but I don't see why we expect a runtime to take over the others.
Sublime text is an editor, VS Code is an IDE, though?

The featuresets aren't the same.
> Just nitpicking but is size of the fee ($250k) really relevant?

Yes - because, in general, large rewards can disproportionately skew a decision maker's risk evaluation. Especially in a situation where there may be only verly limited opportunities to get paid.

For an example see the 1986 K2 disaster [1].

I'm not saying this did or didn't happen in the present tragic situation. But its a risk.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_K2_disaster
Reddit is the only platform that makes sense as a protocol.

The problem is not the protocol. But the user network. And the server network. And the ad network. They need to be made into protocols too.

Imagine git. Now imagine github. Now imagine gitlab. Github owns the entire social networking on its platform. It is not distributed at all. So does gitlab.
https://github.com/sveltejs/learn.svelte.dev
How is saying "I'll ban you if you exercise these rights" not imposing a further restriction on them?
I have a project I'd like to work on that shares a lot of similarities to how I imagine a "family tree maker" webapp might work, would Svelte be a good choice for it?

Basically I'd need the ability to drag and drop, move the tree around like a Map, detect clicks to add new nodes and new branches, stuff like that. I'm thinking an HTML5 canvas would be best but idk.
Volume is more like a tenth of that, I think? Maybe interior dimensions 2 meters diameter and 5 meters length gives around 16 cubic meters if my math is sane (Religion major, so go easy on me if not).
Red Hat can't impose restrictions on rights granted by GPL. But they are well within their rights to terminate business relationships with partners who chose to re-publish sources.

I don't know what the current situation is but Grsecurity operated under a similar arrangement back in the day.
Just an anecdote for those curious about a specific experience.

This time I used VSCode for nearly 2 months. Thought it's the end of an era, I'm not coming back to Sublime Text. I decided to push through and customize the configs just right for me, it was really becoming comfortable. Main reason why I wanted to switch is more active dev, more active extension community, and well integrated modern (some ML-backed) code writing and navigation tools.

I was wrong. After all the painstaking customization to bring it close to my ideal experience, while also getting used to things I didn't want to fight, I still had a bad time.

For one, the tab/cursor focus keeps going into weird places. I press a button, like ESC to switch to normal vim mode, and instead it does nothing, or something different, because turns out I'm not in the editor anymore. Keeps happening, maybe my own fault. The nifty AI tools integration is more of a nuisance — they jump in at bad times (with a delay), and their tab/enter functionality is weird, can never get it right. Most of my autocompletes have been unintentional. Maybe my own fault again, but felt super awkward. There is still no good vertical align plugin, despite such an active community (Sublime doesn't have one either, although they have one that gets me a bit closer). The language server stuff that worked badly in Sublime for my language also works badly in VSCode. The extensions, while numerous, are of questionable quality. I tried to stick to just a few well known ones.

After all the effort, I slowly came to realization that I'm back to not really using anything unique to VSCode, sacrificing more than I gained, being surrounded by lots of small moving details everywhere in the UI that make my experience more awkward than helpful, and occasionally getting my cursor stuck in weird parts of UI. I went back to Sublime.
The three main methods are: acoustic using SONAR to receive data, tether or umbilical cord, and buoy based where the DSV releases a buoy that ascends to the top.

Relays don't really work because you'd need a LOT of them and they'd all have to keep themselves positioned within like 30 meters of each other which is very hard with ocean currents. That's with very low bandwidth VLF radio.
After riding in both Cruise and Waymo cars in SF, I think that Waymo cars are so much more road-ready. While my Waymo rides all seemed pretty smooth albeit with a timid driver, my cruise rides featured extremely skittish behavior around other cars, missing several turns to avoid being around others, and stopping in odd places, especially for dropoff and pickup.
and totally irrelevant. how is having 600mb of dependencies making your life so much harder compared to time savings and developer experience Nextjs provides