skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I dunno about "most people", but I would in no world buy a BMW, Porsche, or Ferrari.

Not everyone wants a status symbol, and not everyone wants a Go Very Fast Very Loud car. Some people genuinely want a car that's comfortable, reliable, and good for the environment.
Cameron is probably the closest to an expert in extreme-depth submarines that we have easily available and not under some national security gag order.
Digital Identity: Centerpiece of Digital Economy; Problems Challenges Solutions
Popular?
I like james cameron, but he's another victim of "popular science". He probably had some input but I couldn't believe he was instrumental in anything when it comes to deepwater exploration. However, he's relatable to population just like Neil Degrasse Tyson or the other space people.

These folks aren't explorers, they're tourists. Robert Ballard was the explorer who had to invent deep water exploration methods from scratch, his input is valid.

More people will click on a link to what Cameron is saying than Ballard (who's he) and we all know thats all that matters nowadays anyway.
For those interested TipTap is doing the heavy lifting here – https://tiptap.dev/examples/default
> Because it implies you log in via FB login I suppose? (I don't connect my account)

I have no idea, and I can’t check any more :D

I have not had to login since I last reinstalled my computer last year, the session simply continued.
I've been looking into HTMX in the past week, actually. This YouTube series is good: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-2EBeDYMIbRByZ8GXhcn...

Also found this: https://github.com/spookylukey/django-htmx-patterns
My previous car was a nearly 20-year-old Outback. I don't think I ever looked at the owner's manual to figure out how to do something on the dashboard console. From the articles and discussions I've been following, I'd most likely have the same complaints about my new vehicle too.

It really makes me wonder how they test these things, because with the amount of issues I ran into within the first couple of days of owning the vehicle leads me to believe they don't actually have a quality process in place for the software and UI.
WG21 should look at the mistakes of Rust and the Rust Foundation and learn from them.
Groundbreaking AI project translates 5k-year-old cuneiform
My ranking of every Shakespeare movie

Does it have Kenneth Branagh? Yes? 10. No? 0.
Every single trashcan shipped from China for military purpose in US would have to be pulled apart, inspected down to nanolevel and then put back together. That would not be just a few dollars...

Edit:

Yes obviously they are concerned about targeted attacks.

And where do you live that hardware store sells trashcans that verifiably comply with all requirements to be put on a custom military Boeing 707 and not f things up in some costly way? By definition any such trashcan is ripe for targeted attack because no one except US defence would have a use for it.
How do people feel about the submarine disaster?

I think they sailed too close to the wind, but there's always going to be an element of risk in some things. Saving thousands of dollars by using a PlayStation controller might be smart, and even make the sub safer (if you put savings towards a hull that won't implode). Some people might say that you should never cut a corner if lives are on the line, and if that's the case they can't complain about a $52,000 trash can, or that 5 major contractors are now the only ones able to compete for contracts.
From salt? Don't I get iodine from my food?
ASP.Net Core MVC deployed on Linux. Has everything + a sweet ORM. Also, WebAssembly support is good and improving.
I wonder if it can translate from English into English Spoken By Five Year Old
The pillows were the fires fuel. The original cause was heater/cooler systems malfunctioning (at least based on the page you linked)
I would assume 5700 PSI of water pressure jetting through any breach would qualify as "vaporised", on top of the structure collapsing.

5700 pounds of pressure per square inch. Ouch.
If you have a SIM in the phone than the only thing what prevents you from dialing anything is the cellular operator itself.

If you don't have a SIM than it's more complicated because the phone needs to register somehow in the network and, probably, indicate what it's trying to call an emergency number (so the network would allow both the registration and the call to occur).

But my $10 on the dialer app just decline it.
> Certainly not? Composite systems that leverage LLMs can do a lot of things - but AFAIU LLMs will likely never rationalize or be able to "add numbers" in the normal sense;

This implies we know what “rationalising” actually is, which we don’t. There’s no reason to believe that our brains don’t operate in fundamentally the same way as LLMs. There’s no reason to think that the LLM approach to reasoning is any less valid than the “normal” way, whatever that even means.
Not to mention https://www.pardus.at This one has a clicky tile-based UI and a space economy simulation.
> Then they don't in LLMs too

LLMs don't get drunk .

If a child answers questions from a book of answers then they'll appear to understand the domain insofar as those questions appear. They do not.

They will fail to answer questions under, eg., permutations of words (say, a question asks about "norepinephrine" but the book only contains "noradrenaline" etc.).

Insofar as a human cannot answer questions under trivial linguistic permutations then they too do not understand the domain.

But these are not the kinds of failures experienced with those who have some capacity, eg., for counter-factual reasoning about their environment's physics.

In those people it is environmental illusion and cognitive impairment -- not trivial permutations of phrasing which lead to catastrophic loss of apparent understanding.

Cognitive impairment = reasoning machine is broken

Environmental illusion = data is ambigious and actions cannto resolve it

These "failure modes" are expected if you actually have the relevant capacity.
This is an internet forum. I doubt any educational policy will be set here.
“sub-nanosecond synchronization”

“typical distances of 10 km between nodes”

Light travels 30cm in a nanosecond. How do they achieve sub-nanosecond accuracy over long distances?
> What does Amazon have a monopoly on?

Audiobooks.

https://doctorow.medium.com/why-none-of-my-books-are-availab...
As an older male, I can confirm that all these causes add up.
By controlling or limiting some of them, I can keep the consequences in check.
Congrats on building and shipping something!

That said, from the original document about Markdown[0]:

> The overriding design goal for Markdown’s formatting syntax is to make it as readable as possible. The idea is that a Markdown-formatted document should be publishable as-is, as plain text, without looking like it’s been marked up with tags or formatting instructions.

From my experience, the benefit of Markdown is that it eliminates the need for WYSIWYG, because WYSIWYG is awful to work with.

Put those two things together, and it's weird for me to see Markdown used like this. Not saying it's wrong or bad or whatever, just that it's weird and seems to cut against the spirit of the thing.

[0]: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on the Future of AI
If you are not a user of RHEL, you don't necessarily get access to its source code. It was so far, but it's not a GPL violation if they stop doing so.

Only users do have this right, not bystanders and competitors, eating the income of the service provider.
Excellent corollary example.

Making real, physical goods is very, very challenging, and I don't think a lot of the denizens of this site (as SWEs) appreciate that.
>however this agreement does permit them to do so.

How so? Assuming you read the whole agreement and not just take a single line out of context?

"If you enable data use for a private repository, we will continue to treat your private data, source code, or trade secrets as confidential and private consistent with our Terms of Service."
> it’s simply a “human mindset” and we all view others outside of our borders as beneath us

I am sad to read this stated as common knowledge, especially in a forum that promotes curiosity. It is not true in my opinion, and should not be normalized.

I am not taking sides in "Euros" or people from US or anything like that, because there are competent people everywhere, but this is not a "human mindset". It has a more fitting name: ignorance. I am not saying you are ignorant (you are just expressing a supposedly common view), but people who think they are above foreigners (no matter which specific country we take as reference) are.

In the last few millennia humans have progressed a lot thanks to cross-pollination of many origins: Greek thought, Italian, Arab, British, American, just to name a few. Suffice to say, I do not share this jaded view of the world.
$300 probably represents the amortized proportional cost of the original design, certification, and manufacturing run.

$50K for a crash can is absurd, but $200K to spin up a production facility and get the output certified to whatever aviation safety standards apply to trash cans sounds about right.
Regardless of where the discussion began, it shifted to an animal multiplication factor represented by N, where the value of N determines the level of cruelty. While I ultimately agree that comment did not consider a lot of open questions, possibly due to being posted in haste, it was good enough to establish a focal point and it became the place where the discussion continued from.

An animal is an animal is an animal. While it is true that there is fluidity in language, and that one could define animal as only a creature kept by humans for the purpose of extracting meat, there was no push back on the use of the more common, broader definition that would be reflected in the dictionary.

Plants have not been considered animals. There has been a clear division between the plants harvested and the animals affected by it throughout the discussion. Whether or not their suffering should be included is and interesting side topic, but immaterial to this one. There is no value in flailing around trying to find new metrics. We picked one. It was certainly not perfect – far from it – but it was good enough. Perfect need not be the enemy of good.

While the philosophers have a point, we are only seeking something to form a belief. Beliefs need not be true. But they do need to be formed, and it seems we don't have enough information to form any kind of beliefs here?
Concerned about this privacy policy, every user should not upload their private data to GitHub, even though this repository is set to private. GitHub should only host public repository or unrelated data.
The question is not that are they doing it -- we know they are -- but why doesn't anyone talk about it more?

There is the obvious western media bias there, but we don't hear about it in Asian or African or other media, either.

My guess is that Western ops are slick, and that the Russians and Chinese are just so prolific in their attacks.
Alot of the people that were tourists* were as arrogant as the designers. Its ironic in this case considering the titanic's construction also had a fair amount of arrogance.

We all know what happens when designers of anything are arrogant.

* notice I said tourists, not explorers of which they were not.
The fatalist “you can’t get it perfect so don’t try” attitude is worse than unhelpful. It reduces safety to a binary state.
A firsthand account of how Montgomery County’s Agricultural Reserve works
Is there an easy way to notice academic / OSS conferences happening near a particular location?

I might have attended this if I'd known about it, but I'm interested in too many topics to monitor all of the relevant communications.
Not all corners are cut the same
code highlighting is done in the client, the infrastructure just serves the content for that particular feature.
Just outside of DC. See also: https://www.planning.org/awards/2017/agriculturalreserve/.
What's the other story?
This is such a bad take. As if rich people suddenly lose the ability to feel novelty. As if a normal person going to see the grand canyon is "So they can recant their journey as an intrepid explorer (/s) at <a neighborhood barbecue.>"

Maybe, just maybe, the ultra rich have similar motivations as most other people and want to see cool shit. They just have way more spending money to make whatever they want a reality.
The binary compatibility exists, it's just that the ecosystems have too many differences. e.g. distro A may ship libfoo.so.1.5.3 and distro B libfoo.so.1.3.2 and distro C ships libfoo.so.2.0.0

Other than that you can run a binary for distro X on distro Y without any problems, and "Linux binaries" from the 90s should also still work as such today (as in, the kernel will run them). I frequently run binaries from Debian packages in spite of not using Debian or anything derived from it and that usually works without any tinkering, and when it doesn't you can usually make it work by also fetching a library or two from Debian.

This is also a problem on Windows, because your Windows 95 binary may also not work because of issues like this, depending on exactly how it's compiled, what it does, etc.

Static linking solves many of these issues, but also has its own set of downsides, and it's an old discussion. In general, I'm in favour of this though. Some people are vehemently opposed to it with an aggressive passion which means that in practice support for it isn't that great.
They should team up with the Financial Modeling World Cup and do a hybrid EVE/Excel esports event.

(Reference for those who are unfamiliar: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/08/excel-esports-on-espn...)
I think this is a great tool. Not discounting the value of work (which you started long ago) that you have done already, but I am thinking that an LLM could do it much more easily today.
Their arguments are the same that any other layer involved could use to sit it out.

“We shouldn’t be the police, let some layer above or below us be the police, just anyone but us!”

What they don’t really say is that an abuse team costs money to run.

When self-regulation doesn’t work, you risk ending up with legally-imposed regulation. I’m sure that will really delight them.
AFAIK this has been known already? See the Off-label section of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabergoline
Post-mortem analysis saves future lives.
Active investment doesn’t make sense for you. It does for others who may have different aims.

Think of the needs of someone with a big pile of unrealized gains. You don’t want to sell and create tax events, but borrowing money and using shorts or options to address short term risk might make sense.
The white collar priests of silicon valley will save us from our sins
In the system design of a submarine? Really? How many has he designed?
Well, you can take that from someone who does it for a living (not for Boeing or the Pentagon, bit still), or not. Your choice. Whether or not 50k is actually justified or not, no idea. But the price for a new, low volume, production of obsolete aircraft spares is orders of magnitude more expensive than the original high volume one. And even it if is old stock, as soon as the low contractual prices are running out, everyone is paying market prices. And those mean: either you pay, you don't fly or you certify an alternative.
> You could write a GUI, a game, a text processor, a compiler and even an OS as a one person team.

You still can and many still do, but we expect a lot more from our tools in 2023 than we did in 1983.
And, just for context, Challenger Deep is nearly 3x as deep as the wreck of the Titanic.

It’s also worth mentioning he was the first ever person to reach it solo.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gitlab-and-google-c...
Prozac, Lipitor, and Flonase are also PFAS used in the body.
Then you should probably check out Hoffmann's "ultimate french press technique" https://youtu.be/st571DYYTR8
IMO it produces the best coffee I've ever been able to make in a french press.
How would the notation be "introduced to you" at all, when reading source code? What book would there be? How would you know how to find it?

This is a serious drawback to the traditional math notation: if you didn't come up along one specific educational pathway, it seems to be effectively impossible to work your way in and figure out what any of it means. You can't pronounce any of it, you can't look it up; even if you can work out the names of the symbols, they often mean different things in different contexts. It is a mess.

For many years now, the way I have ingested CS papers is to read the introduction closely, getting my head around the concept, then bail out once the inscrutable symbols show up and go find an actual implementation in some real, documented, parseable programming language - any one will do - from which I can readily infer what the rest of the paper was supposed to mean.
appreciate this very much! It's like it's piracy on a different level! Just noticed that it was also reuploaded 2nd time with a slightly different album cover.
So get RHEL for your devs then. The only guaranteed bug compatibility
A few years back I bought a new Motorolla phone(for the replaceable battery) from the official Motorolla US Amazon store. I received a broken device with the packaging seal broken and the antenna not working at all. It was clearly a previously returned device that I also sent back.

So that's the reality of how they do business.
Is it quarterbacking, when the person is also a quarterback?

James Cameron has (purportedly) designed and built submersibles, and has made the dive to the Titanic many (edited) times.

I take his pov less as a second guessing game, and instead providing an informed opinion, in part because this event will have repercussions for everyone else who is using submersibles.
>However, if I build a kit plane, the FAA will require it be emblazoned "Experimental" and commercial activity - such as paying passengers - is forbidden.

unless you're a big company

https://www.reddit.com/r/flying/comments/ono50t/ever_see_a_m...
As a German, it always suprises me how pedantic americans can be when it comes to Letter of the Law vs Spirit of the Law situation. Yes, for Warplane Parts this whole Idea of keeping it inside america and enable local companies to continuously produce parts is reasonable. Having to receive bids for contracts as a public entity is also reasonable. But is there no one in government that can see that a 50k trashcan is just pointless? Is it really impossible to apply some level of basic human reason and common sense to such situations?
The US is at risk of being out-competed by nominal communists and practical authoritarians. They've already been knocked down to 2nd biggest economy adjusted for PPP and US government spending appears to be in a death-debt spiral where it pays for itself with donations from foreigners. The real burden of that is probably going to land on the middle class sometime soon and cause political hiccups that go beyond mere Trumpism.

Spending $50k on a trash can is unlikely to lead to the sort of benefits that are required. Better than unemployment benefits for nothing, maybe. The opportunity costs and time wasted on bureaucracy put even that optimistic spin in doubt. Basic research doesn't need 3% of GDP spent on overinflated contracts. It can't be helping the situation.
>There is no unrestrained capitalism. This is the doing of the managerial class

Who precisely do you think has 90% of the power in 90% of businesses? And before you say 'the shareholders, duh', the venn diagram of the PMC and shareholders of these massive corporations is a circle. The ruling class is the PMC. They run the corporations. How could it be any other way?
mysterydip’s point is that you gave google the right to do that to your document.
You forgot the "/s".
You COULD say that, if you define "working for" in a particular way.

But if define it that way, then "working for" becomes a phrase that has no real use. "X is working for Y" just means "Y has a lot of influence in the world" and says nothing about the relationship between X and Y. So I don't recommend using that definition.
Yes but it is not hard to get it back - you have to contact the bank

In emergency you need to contact your bank.

I have had my card declined several times
Once on travel to USA - I probably should have told them before - in this case I had to phone them an international call and it was immediately reinstated.
They also denied a payment when it was in a place accross the country from my normal use, which wa good as it was not me trying to use it.

Basically if your spending is abnormal - e.g. in a different place or for a large amount then you might have to confirm the payment. The benefit is the bank is able to stop more fraud.
Leaving Clojure – Feedback for those that care
No it's not, and the high levels of lactose intolerance in much of the world back that up.
Ask HN: Best way to learn about a company's culture in 2023?
What are some things or resources you've found useful when trying to evaluate a company's culture from the outside?
> ... holding a small collection of waste is that intense eh?

If it catches fire on the $330M plane it's made for, potentially.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Thule_Air_Base_B-52_crash involved a ~$80M (adjusting for inflation) lost B-52, another $80M in cleanup costs, and a still missing 1.1 megaton nuclear weapon, over a couple pillows that caught fire.
This is a trash can, not an aircraft's engine
Or, a simpler explanation: "corruption".
As I see it people are basically taking a single line of an agreement that explicitly references other agreements out of context:

"If you enable data use for a private repository, we will continue to treat your private data, source code, or trade secrets as confidential and private consistent with our Terms of Service."
I’ve enjoyed seeing the communities that form around these songs. There is a similar song called “Fond My Mind” that has seen many re-makes and adaptations despite having an unknown origin (likely from Brazil in the late 80s/early 90s).
Didn't get that vibe at all. He seems to be very direct and to the point.
Using state machines as enum + switch. Massive simplification for protocol based things and solving edge cases during communication.
I think as long as most of the protests don't end up in violence and shop lootings they could stay.
> the right to scan your documents

Don't they have legal liability here? There is stuff that they can actually get into actual legal trouble for facilitating the sharing and hosting of.
No they are not.

You can share if you want and they can do nothing about it.

But then can and will ban you as a Red Hat customer and thus you will not have access to future versions.

GPL does not mandate they give you access to future versions.
Because that has a non-zero chance of customers exiting out of the sale. I’m guessing they measured the lost sales against fraudulent affiliates and chose fraud affiliates.

People are funny and the slightest distraction might skunk the sale. Not for most, but for a few percent.

I watched my grandmother purchase something online and it was revealing how much time it took and how much she struggled. Something that took 10 seconds for me took her 15 minutes. Amazon wants those sales too.
>anime.js
>look inside
>no anime

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/515/832/ee7...
> Now SUV fan because it makes loading the kids in

You know what is even easier for loading kids in a vehicle? Sliding doors.
I think it was an attempt of a joke.
Well they could silently do anything. No need to toggle the user-visible checkbox

It's like giving a party some of your possessions to store, and signing a form saying you don't consent to them snooping through them, then worrying "what if they change and forge the contract later?". They wouldn't need to. Either you trust them to keep their word or you don't trust them with your possessions at all