skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I doubt Amazon does this. It would expose them to too much legal risk. Almost no large employers (in the US) will say much more than "This person worked here from date X to date Y and they (are/are not) eligible for rehire."

You are overlooking the salient fact that managers and recruiters know each other from one company to another. Backend conversations matter.
> it really is a risk/reward question

risk: die

reward: cool pic on instagram
Maybe, but the ability to make some arbitrary program do some arbitrary thing is the exact experience that lead many of us to fall in love with computing.

10 FOR X = -5 TO 5
20 PRINT TAB(XX);""
30 NEXT X

wow, a parabola!
If it happens once it's accident, if it happens constantly, its their responsibility if not starting a protest at all would prevent the violence

And if they put their label on it it's their responsibility.
This is great actually!
Redhat continues to keep the same maintainers and devs on payroll and working on the same open-source projects, so the OSS ecosystem won't loose anything in that regard.

But where will the big research labs that previously used Scientific Linux, then Almalinux go now? CentOS Stream? Debian?
They will switch some systems to RHEL, but probably only a minority.

I wonder what distro will gain from this, makes me excited for the future.
All they had to do was scrape public records before they were sealed or expunged. When a record is sealed or expunged, that only means the court stops publishing it or deletes their record. Anyone who retrieved it before that doesn't have to give it back and nobody's memory gets wiped.
> Therefore, there is no significant gap between titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced composite to create galvanic corrosion. This means that commercially pure titanium and its alloys are completely resistant to galvanic corrosion when they are coupled with carbon composites.
There are Corporate and then there are IBM.

Some corporations have a working long term plan, even if those plans are are purely about making more money in the future. Can't say the same for IBM.
The grown ups involved in that who didn't pay heed to warnings would be reckless. We still rescue them but we can charge those who can pay for it.
Go down the Mississippi :-)
Whatabouism.

Also tragic. Being sad over this does not preclude being sad about those events.
A as musician, technologist, and sample user of many years I disagree.

Your usage of sample is correct, but there are other usages of the word which are alos correct, and the term "sampler" isn't specific to the literal digital signal sampling.

I have bought and made plenty of sample packs, to be played back by various sample players, over the last 25 years. A "sampler" refers to how the device works with recordings, not the individual digital samples that it makes up- as far as I understand it anything that allows you to recontextualuze short recordings is a sampler,

A mellotron very much is a mechanical sampler, though very limited compared to its current digital counterparts.

I am open to being wrong. But your claim is a bit odd. While I'd be stoked to see some evidence in the philology of the term that says I'm wrong, I just don't think that is something you'd find.
If you mean wasn’t rated then yes.

It’s a shitshow from start to finish.
You absolutely can - so long as you don't get other people killed in the process. The CEO of this company convinced customers to join him on his death march, which IMO is a worth crying about.
>Perhaps moderators and users should be willing to admit that Reddit produces some of the value here.

Sure, there's a lot of spam and other things that Reddit will do in the background, so it makes sense that reddit does SOMETHING.

But that's not really what the protest is about. And the 3rd party app controls are simply the breaking point instead of a sudden crack in the community. To use your example: MS and Adobe would be in their own ivory towers, but were set on making several user centric changes while doing their own version of a squeeze. Every CS update and uhh, most major Windows updates would come with some big features that benefited the user amongst the inevtiable ads, subscription models, and all the other stuff people dread in modern software. The continue to improve and never rested on their laurels.

Reddit on the other hand, has been full of broken promises, features that were not desired, and a bunch of drama on the admin level that would get any other mod banned. I don't think someone who quit in 2015 who tried out reddit in 2023 would notice a signifigant improvement. Images and videos are built-in now, but with worse, more limited services than Youtube or Imgur. Flairs have gotten a tiny better but still are just very hacked-in search query links in reality. You can filter subs from r/all now, which came as a result of a huge drama instead of an apparent willingness to support the user (good lesson that Mods leaned for now. You need to be loud if you want Reddit to listen).

>for a free product their ads are among the least intrusive I can think of.

of course, much more effective to "natively advertise" through thinly veiled bots that Reddit does not enough about.
The answer is same as with western commies, coz the ideals speak to them but they never lived by it and are aware of the bad stuff
Yeah, it really is a failure of the kind of engineering hubris that you see all over HN every day.

This event reads like nature going "no, seriously, you monkeys aren't anywhere nearly as clever as you think you are".
> They do, but not the depths we're talking about

We really don’t know what depth the noise was comming from.

That being said it is vanishingly unlikely that an unrelated submarine trying to remain stealthy would be banging on their hull every half an hour.
> And of course the average person here is probably a lot closer to taking a holiday trip in a submersible than to taking a refugee boat across the Mediterranean.

The average person here might think they are, but they'd be deluding themselves.
I don't see why it wouldn't. Ubuntu has Intel's Thread Director driver in the latest updates, you should be able to park cores like you do on Windows and recoup a significant amount of the TDP.
I agree. I read this line:

> ∀ instead of forall, which is faster to input than the whole word.

It reminds me of the idiom that code is often written once but read often, so one would want to optimize for readability and not fewer keystrokes. At least for production code.
Specimens of Fancy Turning (1869)
Sink deep, crush self.
Gnome is a healthy non-profit foundation with the majority of its organizational capacity (and income) not associated with Red Hat.

Red Hat hasn't been dominant in Wayland for years. It's very much a community effort, including governance and maintainership.

systemd is currently mostly developed by employees of Microsoft, Meta and Suse, aside from I guess Frantisek.

Red Hat does a lot, and I'm sure they have thoughts about where they spend their money, but I don't think people really understand how decoupled these projects and communities are.
I think the issue with the OP is that it does not strike me as very well considered in a way that’s similar to ‘old iPhone criticism’. It seems anchored to past decisions[1] for other devices and the reasons they were made, and seems overconfident for an opinion on a device which the author does not have detailed specifications for.

I think two things could have made the article more useful:

1. A better structured article. This was a mix of random details and jargon with speculation about the new device that didn’t feel well tied together.

2. I would expect the view of a sceptical expert to be more cautious and considered; to say what things might be difficulties, why they were difficulties for things in the past, how Apple seems to be planning to deal with them, where that approach might fail or succeed, and then some estimate of whether it seems easy for them to solve the problem. That is, it should be more clear what the assumptions are that are being relied on for the estimation.

To take a stereotypical iPhone criticism for example, it would be bad to merely say that the lack of keyboard or badness of touchscreens makes it impossible and better to say that good touchscreens and some kind of solution to keyboard problems would be needed, and you don’t think improved sensor resolution would work and the problem seemed hard because X or Y. Like, I’m not saying that the author needs to be right but I think they could do a better job of having convincing reasons that they have tried to thought of the ways they might be wrong.

[1] There was some discussion of a device the author worked on in the ‘90s(!) but I didn’t see discussion of more recent work. Capabilities of much of the tech going into this Apple thing will be quite different.
I'm just trying to understand your philosophical position: I don't have to care about certain people, as revenge for others not caring about a different group of people?

For me all human life is precious and equally worthy of effort to save, as well as sympathy and grief for their loss. I suppose that's not your position, but I don't quite understand what it is.
Why is creating a quadtree O(log n)?
First time I read the comparison with the Med disaster and couldn't agree more.

I'm never the first one to start whining about refugee related disasters but hundreds of women & children drowning on a boat after having been in a miserable state for days on end is just the worst. Other boats had been circling it for days and apart from providing some food & water nothing was done. Maybe an attempt to tow it, which could well have led to the capsizing.

How could such a ship have been rescued? Any attempt at evacuation would have probably led to a capsizing anyway due to people moving around in a panic, unless ... the boat was wedged between two strong boats?
Then they shouldn't have poked the bear.

By taking out the CentOS Foundation, which was NEVER going to sell support. They created 2 companies that will sell support, and they still have the same issue.

At the WORST those companies will have to buy a RHEL license somewhere in here, if Red Hat takes away redistribution rights on the srpms... they might as well put a gun to their own head.

SuSE will take the business gladly.
Should we add (2015) to the submission title?

The blog post has no date, but I found an earliest entry at waybackmachine from march that year [1].

[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20150314172909/https://precursor... .

Edit: I see the title has been updated, thanks!
It's hard to tell without more context of your own whether you're supporting what I said, or refuting the argument that Red Hat are freeloaders, which is an argument I did not make.
The fastest way to learn how to make machinable parts is to machine them yourself :). DFM is often a hard-earned skill.

Unfortunately maker-spaces (the only kinds of places where you could get cheap access to good 3+ axis CNC mills) seem to have gone out of fashion. CNC mills in general cost about 5 digits just for the machine, and usually that again for the tooling.

I think the closest one can get to learning some DFM without working on a machine would be watching machinists on YouTube. Back in the day NYC CNC was great, but I think they post more hype content these days.

I'm far from an expert on the topic, but I spent a decent amount of time designing for and then fabricating stuff on CNC machines over the last couple years. To my knowledge, operations are cheap while setups are expensive: if you can design a part around a fixed orientation in a machine, it saves a lot of operator time.
Red Hat is IBM now. That might not be clear today, but give it 5 or 10 years and it will be.
They didn't want to spend the money to build a portal rated to 4000m.
I'm aware of that in fact, it's still far from the "pure" SPA as what React or Vue provides. SSR-first sveltekit is not the same as "pure" CSR SPA, and I do not need read all the SSR oriented doc to figure out how to do a CSR SPA. I spent a few months with Svelte(kit) and eventually returned to React.

If ever Svelte does CSR-first SPA with client side builtin router, I will definitely give a second try, until then, React will be my choice.
https://positivepsychology.com/history-of-meditation/

> The earliest written records of meditation come from the Hindu Vedas around 1500 BCE (Sharma, 2015). The Torah also contains a description of the patriarch Isaac going to “lasuach” in a field, a kind of Jewish meditation most likely practiced around 1000 BCE (Kaplan, 1985).

> I have seen no evidence of this.

That doesn't imply no evidence. In fact, there is tons of evidence that meditation originated from a religious context. It is not even controversial.
Actually, solving problem quick and dirty, putting the solution to a test and iterating will probably result in better outcomes than simply thinking super hard and making less attempts for a whole bunch of tasks.

It sure helps to be able to iterate quickly in software development for one.

It has reminded me of an exchange from Shirobako (best anime ever, 100/100, watch it even if you prefer other forms); older animator is telling their younger colleague to learn to draw faster, because while they can work on the quality for the rest of their life, but they won't be able to draw fast when they are older. Drawing faster means more iterations, means more experience gained overall.
I haven't seen the full waiver anywhere. The death being mentioned three times comes from someone who took an earlier Titan dive. However, it is mentioned in David Pogue's story about OceanGate: https://youtu.be/29co_Hksk6o?t=160
htmx, alpinejs + golang is the exact stack I've been thinking about. I'm not a front-end developer, but want to be able to prototype things quickly. Are you aware of any public examples of this stack that go beyond "Hello, World!"?
The problem was they sold tourist trips in this deathtrap. Sure, do whatever you want by yourself, if it hurts only you. Selling this as a product, by tapping into the existing market for adventure tourism was borderline evil. The difference with this and generic adventure tourism is that this was about as survivable (I guess) as a round of Russian roulette.
OK let me be simple

It will always be garbage

This is a hype road. There's nothing. There never will be anything.

It's just automated plagiarism.

The advantage of Reddit is genuinely new content which this method can't ever create.
I can understand your frustration with the article, but let's approach it with an open mind. While the use of a "chatgpt detector" may have its limitations, it's essential to appreciate the researchers' effort in exploring new methods. The study may not be perfect, but it contributes to the ongoing conversation about the risks of using AI in AI training. Irony aside, let's keep the discussion going and encourage further research to improve our understanding of this complex field.
I sure wish we could move beyond HTML + JS into a unified Clojure browser. HTML is what’s holding the web back and there’s no excuse for JS to be the only browser scripting language at this point.
Business models break, when money is no longer almost free. Interest rates near zero created a historically rather unique environment. That’s now apparently ending.
This is funny because I've heard this from the opposite approach: using forecast accuracy to determine personal model accuracy.

If you can accurately predict the future above random chance, that lends evidence that your internal state aligns with reality.

(There are obviously traps here, eg the conspiracy theorist who sees every outcome as proof of the conspiracy)
Aaron Amick called it.

An engineering student said that in the video of OceanGate wrapping carbon fibre, they were making a 2nd year engineering mistake of not doing a cross weave. It's basically unidirectional and likely to fail when force is applied to the right angle.

Front glass is only rated for 1300m, not 4000m.

CEO seems to think the way to test something like this is to take the thing down to 4000m, hear horrible creaking noise. Came back up, and did it again, only to discard the null when it was creaking on the second time. https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/lawsuit-insufficient-prototy...

I bet the CBS reporter that went down with them in a previous trip is thanking his lucky stars...
Thanks, I see now. Wow, that's a thick layup.
Yes, it's good entertainment, for many.
To be fair, he was not ignored. He was fired.
I audibly laughed at your second paragraph. Yes you understand this perfectly :).
This is unrelated to the article and can also be seen as political flamebait.
The test states at the end that dogmatism is measured based on the answers to a subset of the questions—the game is simply a correlate.
wasm has properties that are unique versus other existing bytecode systems

those properties are important
I think some functions with exhaustively enumerable could be good candidates as well (I guess somewhat rare though?). For example an Int->(...) or Float->(...) function (Doubles are not exhaustively enumerable though, I guess, since 2^64 ~= 10^19, 10,000-Peta items). If the programmer can give an error threshold, e.g. in bits of precision (maximum relative error), that should work quite well too.
A governement doing badly it's job is a marker of corruption or incompetence, not political alignement.
The wolf looks better, but also looks less like what you'd see in a "nature documentary" (part of the prompt).

I think the coffee cup looks better in the right phot, it seems a tad bit more real to me.

Like you I much prefer the alien photo on the left, but the photos are so stylistically different I'm not sure that says anything about the releases' respective capabilities.
I guess I'm saying it's a spectrum. Other than the teenager, my empathy extends as far as "at least they didn't suffer as a consequence of doing something that they knew damn well was likely to kill them".

"Equally worthy of effort" - ironic because the amount of money spent trying to save these 5 people could save hundreds or thousands of times as many people. But I don't see people clamoring for equality in helping the disenfranchised.
I'm not sure that is accurate about the EULA?

The EULA I find googling (this is not something I am previously acquainted with) says:

> With the exception of certain image files identified in Section 1.3 below, the license terms for the components permit User to copy, modify, and redistribute the component, in both source code and binary code forms. This EULA does not limit User's rights under, or grant User rights that supersede, the license terms of any particular component.

— https://www.redhat.com/en/about/licenses/rhds-rhcs-eula

I may not be interpreting that correctly or what it means practically, I'm not really familiar with what's going on here. If you definitely know better than me, I'm happy to hear it (cites to other informed authors explaining it would be great!), but I don't want to go down a long thread accidentally discussing things based on a misunderstanding of the EULA...

I do get that Red Hat is trying to somehow add value to open source software (linux), have it's software be understood as being open source itself (for the marketing value), while also trying to get people to pay to use it. They are trying to have their cake and eat it too, I get it. And maybe they have enough lawyers to make it work somehow, or can just make it so inconvenient practically to use the rights the open source license grants to make it work somehow.

But yeah, if you "don't want to give your main product away for free", and your "main product" is licensed with an open source license... you are in a pretty difficult spot. Which is, I guess, where Red Hat finds themselves.
yeah, I don't know what the thought process was behind "let's use an issue tracking system as if it was a forum soliciting highly controversial feedback -- what could go wrong?"

with extra bonus points of "you know what has great UX? the gitlab issue page!"
It's a weird angle to me.

There's a lot of focus on how Intel allows too much iteration to happen, with hot bins and many samples. I can see that's indicative of a problem, can be a crutch you shouldn't be needing to lean on.

But at the same time, being able to iterate & work on the next thing actively seems like a huge potential advantage. You wouldn't want to survive off it, take it for granted, like it seems Intel has, but having to take your design & wait in line like everyone else, for your scheduled slot for chips, seems like a massive drag on innovation & improvement.
I'd be curious to hear anyone report how many hours of battery life they get with Asahi under typical web browsing conditions (no video). I've seen plenty of folks use words like "decent" to describe it under Asahi, but very few precise numbers. I'd love to hear "I was able to use my MacBook for 9 hours in Asahi before it died", even if it's purely anecdotal.
Power loss?
This is consistent with this video of a trip. Comms were lost, and the pilot even jettisoned some of the ballast in order to resurface. They continued the descent later though.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RAncVNaw5N0
This isn’t a RedHat problem, it’s an IBM problem.
Good thing that Gitea has/is worked/working on a compatible Ci/CD pipeline.

Not sure if it’s 100% compatible yet, but that’s their goal.
>You are Linux for much of the market. You own it. Profit.

What a twist!

So after all it wasn't Microsoft EEEing Linux, but actual "Linux Companies"?!
I specialize in software perf & scalability, so read nearly everything I can on the subject, especially concrete cases like this!
almost 20 years ago when I took a Red Hat Kernel internals class (at Redhat) they basically told us to use CentOS if we wanted to experiment with RHEL. (We were preparing for a transition from the HPUX/Solaris machines.). But it worked, some of our architects did that and we could get the scheduler behaving similar to HPUX. I left that company, but I'm pretty sure they did switch and RedHat got a big contract out of it.

We've come a long way.
A 2% difference in scores between the most and least dogmatic users means your test complete hogwash.

Your refusal to provide any data beyond averages is very telling. My guess is that there's a very wide distribution of scores, little trend, and very little correlation.
companies are not one unified thing, though they may project that and internalize that. You don't think that there is internal tension ? differing opinions among staff attorneys?

second however, it seems that there is a growing conceit among the cloud-native management, that they can ignore GPL, throw it into code-regrinding services, and generally act with impunity.
Institutional Knowledge needs to preserved and maintained once developed.

I imagine we'll see some of the large-cap tech companies dealing with this very soon.