skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Who cares if dirt gets in? You have to clean anyways right? Is dirt more powerful outside than inside? Dirt in the air doesn't matter? If your shoe has excessive dirt, you can wipe it on a matt as you ener right?

Also, not changing socks means now random people leave feet sweat and nastiness all over the house floor.
>If you grow up in a clean country that isn’t very muddy outside

what are you even talking about? have you ever walked to the far side of the parking lot you live in the middle of?
Original iPhone was 599, an expensive phone at the time. Today 599 isn’t considered that expensive for a smartphone.

The price doesn’t have to come down as 3.5k is the modern day equivalent to the price of a laptop 10-20 years ago.
To be honest Figma gives plenty of tools to solve this problem. With various reusable components, font/color/sizing templates etc. Its reasonably easy to be extremely consistent with your measurements in figma, as long as designers spend the time to learn the tool, and not just use it like photoshop / illustrator.

Even resizability can be done quite well, allowing the designers to create reusable bits that stretch and squeeze to fit the needed space, and the way they deformed can be easily read (and verified!)
A Clear case of "Practicing what you preach" and "Use your expertise".
Apple pushed updates for 3 new zero-days that may have been actively exploited
How have you created the svg screencast in the README?
Sorry to disappoint you but all chickens are born with absolute pitch. It's how chickens communicate.
For a business in Australia to sponsor a visa for an international hire, they have to prove that they were more qualified than a local applicant and pay them more. I'm not sure if that's always followed, but it certainly made it very hard for myself to get a job.

Now I'm a permanent resident after being with my Australian partner for over a decade, self employed and running my own company.
I'm amused, as I immediately think, "er/expand-region" covers this like a champ. Complete with C-g leaving the cursor where you started, if you change your mind.
The author exposed children to sounds and organized a way for them to play with them using cheap tools. She sang to them for a few minutes a day and then start practicing with the one who showed interest.

I really have no idea where the ideas about "what to mean to learn music" or racing through it came about.

>>I really wish the idea of "racing" through your musical education with hacks like this would stop - the only real way to get to advanced levels quickly is with a shit load of practice. My friends who went to international competitions at 18-20 were all practicing 5+ hours a day by age 12, and several of them actually started their music education at age 7-9 rather than obscenely early like this.

So instead of playing with your children for a few minutes a day when they are very young, singing to them and naming sounds it's better to go about it in a proper way: wait till they are 7, be careful not to expose them to music too much as you can spoil the whole thing should they attain a perfect pitch. Then make them really practice a few hours a day once they are old enough. Only this way you avoid racing through your musical education!
It’s their country they can ban Russian if they want.

That's quite a chauvinistic attitude to take -- and ignores the complex history of linguistic diversity in Ukraine.

No linguistic expression should be banned anywhere, period, full stop.

(To be clear: this is no way supports what the troll account above you was posting, which was of course pure nonsense).
Tutorial "optional" is just weasel words for "works like things I already know." Problem is, especially in expert tooling, that everyone seems to know something else.
I find it difficult to be interested in this philosophical difference between the two when only difference is in how they treat the empty string.

That is, splitting with regex look-behind/look-ahead, like:

(?<=\n)(?=.)

with a suitable definition of dot, also matches "negative space", and produces the same results as Python's str.splitlines(True), except for the empty string.

>>> import re
>>> p = re.compile(r"(?<=\n)(?=.)", re.DOTALL)
>>> def check(s):
... lines = p.split(s)
... assert lines == s.splitlines(True), lines
... return lines
...
>>> check("no newline at end of file")
['no newline at end of file']
>>> check("\nno-newline")
['\n', 'no-newline']
>>> check("line\nno-newline")
['line\n', 'no-newline']
>>> check("line\nline\n")
['line\n', 'line\n']
>>> check("\n")
['\n']
>>> check("\n\n")
['\n', '\n']
>>> check("\n\n\n")
['\n', '\n', '\n']
>>> check("")
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "<stdin>", line 3, in check
AssertionError: ['']
I already have two quests. But the AR is terrible. The external cameras suck.
It's barely useable. I rely a lot on code completion, search capabilities and syntax checking while I code. It just saves a lot of time from having to execute the compiler and wait for it to check everything.

With good "plugins" or "features" all of these things happen async.
Lumendatabase.org is my go-to for the porn links which have been removed from the search results. Thanks Google !
The French version (readable with a translation extension) does, but it's just one of a long list of things including GrapheneOS, LineageOS, Jitsi, FDroid, Tor, RiseupVPN, etc.
> If you don't ask "why am I here" or "what's this all about" then things get pretty bland pretty quickly

Better question: Is it possible to escape this rat cage, and if so, how? If I am the universe experiencing itself, how do I perform a sufficiently perfect playthrough against the gradients that constitute its walls?

Nevermind drugs. Let's get BCI -- the end-all, be-all of humanity -- properly off to the races. Invasively or not, get these thoughts out of the rotting confines of our skulls.

If it doesn't work out, whatever. It's not like that's a different outcome than the rest.
Also at the time compilers were expensive proprietary things. Ease of compiler implementation was big and enabled low barrier to entry. The allowance for variation in semantics, like data type sizes lowered it too.
Quest 2 and Quest Pro passthrough is terrible.

The Quest 3 may be better but literally everything they asked for requires good passthrough.

That 1/7th the price would be sunk money if they’re trying to evaluate real world interaction.
Carbon Dioxide Scrubber
Very interesting data points with this article. Just happened across Rush’s linkedin page earlier and he has an undergrad degree in aerospace engineering and an mba. In my opinion he is just barely crossing the “line” here with innovation and business versus solid engineering principles.
I personally think this sub is lacking in safety and navigation features but it is “cool” in some areas of innovation. But technical innovation is not always needed.
Very interesting; it looks like these people went to Syria to fight ISIS, and got this ill treatment when they returned.

Why does it seem like the French government is always supporting the worst actors in any conflict? ISIS is (was) so evil and barbaric, they make Putin seem like a great guy. Why would volunteering to fight them ever be seen in a bad light?
Except I'm sure that book fails to mention many examples where the long tail worked and instead focuses on where the long tail failed and biases it's own story around that.

Jetbrains suite of IDEs are basically long tails and they have huge utility in many areas that exceed other editors.
Doesn't adhd just exacerbate the problem, but isn't the real cause? Like I will sometimes avoid some tasks because they highlight my insecurities
And then they’d be liable for timewasting.
But can Red Hat restrict its users from further distributing the source code or would they be allowed to do that?
Besides the archive.is link already posted, you can find it on the Internet Archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20230622023623/https://furiouslyr...
Improvised Apollo 13 CO2 Scrubber:

https://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a13/a13_LIOH_Adapter.html
No, not terrible, if you don't want to be called by any word - that's okay and will be respected in any polite conversation.

But no need to call words you don't like a slur and ban them (especially if it's not a slur).
It was never on the Quest. The desktop version still works fine.

However Google recently made the underlying APIs available so it will be soon
I have a USA amazon account and a Japan amazon account. They are completely separate. So yes, it's easy to sign up for Prime multiple times if you use multiple accounts.
A sibling comment mentioned that harpsichords tend to have wood frames, and so they are incredibly reactive to temperature and humidity. The pin blocks in harpsichords also are often a single piece of hardwood, while in a piano they are a laminate of specially selected quartersawn hardwoods, so they hold the tuning pins a lot more strongly. If you hire a piano tuner for your harpsichord, they also tend to torque the pins too hard, which weakens the pin block even more.

Depending on the instrument and temperament, a tuning could be ~45 min or up to 90 min. Small instruments in the family (spinets and virginals) could have <4 octaves and one stop, meaning <50 strings to tune, and the biggest instrument had 5 stops and a 5-octave keyboard, meaning more strings than a piano (300 vs about 230). The "standard" instrument is ~4.5 octaves with 3 stops, meaning ~150 strings.

The customer picks the temperament generally, and that has some effect on how long it takes. Quarter-comma tunings (4 fifths flat by a quarter of a comma, the rest remaining pure) like Werckmeister are the quickest, and took under an hour on the standard instrument, but tunings like Kellner (1/5th comma, but harder from an A reference) and Valloti (1/6th comma) took me at least 2 passes to touch up, so over an hour. I also did equal temperament tunings with a tuner, which are quick. For reference, it takes me about 90 minutes to 2 hours to do a piano, so I am a little slow by professional piano tuner standards, but harpsichords are definitely quicker.

I also frequently adjusted the tuning based on what repertoire was being played, rotating it so that the near-pure thirds would be in the keys of the repertoire and possibly raising leading tones a bit. It was also not uncommon to have a modern woodwind in an ensemble, which often meant only doing a slightly spicy version of equal temperament rather than using a full-on baroque tuning.

The harpsichords were pretty much all at schools - I started by tuning my school's instruments and expanded from there.

I generally charged my hourly rate for 4 services/instrument/month + some padding, with extras (concerts) going at an hourly rate. This was a "work study" arrangement at my school (although I had 15 hours/week of work study for <3 hours of work, and still gave them a discount at the standard student rate) and contract work outside.
Anyone who spends a little time around children will quickly see that some have better hand eye coordination and are good at catching balls, some have an excellent sense of smell, some do very well with numbers, some can draw people's faces with little training, etc.

Here is a list of things you can objectively measure to determine which children have innate musical talent.

And it doesn't matter a great deal either. Innate talent plus no work will get you nowhere. No talent and work will get you somewhere although maybe not to the top.

https://www.aimm.edu/blog/is-musical-talent-innate-or-acquir...
I use and love Bitwarden, but they also took some venture money recently so I won't be surprised if something similar happens (if not already).
I had the exact same experience. Back when I was using Keepass I manually synchronised the file onto 2 cloud providers because the only native sync option was rsync and WebDAV or something, which was useless for mobile.

I used to have 3 copies of the same file so that in case I forgot to sync I would not overwrite some passwords.

At some point I realised what I was doing was not much better than a glorified spreadsheet with passwords and moved on.
Prices and and integration is the complaint, it's anti-comprtitive.
Oh wow, I had assumed that night vision goggles would already cover the night vision idea more than fine. And under the budget of this. Night vision things are expensive, though. Impressively so.

The drone things, amusingly, are already price competitive. At least once you factor in the cost of the drone.
As other have pointed out, this stuff is massive still! Nootropics, keto, mindfulness, microdosing, juicing, crystal healing, the list grows endlessly.

But it’s interesting to note how these practices have evolved to meet new cultural circumstances. It feels like more of it is motivated by goals of productivity and status on one side, and distrust of authority on the other, new age, side.

It’s all still absolutely mainstream and in public discourse. But of course, it’s changed. We shouldn’t expect cultural practices to not have evolved since the turn of the 20th century. After all, the culture has changed a LOT since then. These cultural practices exist to meet the needs of people and communities. Those needs change, the practices will change with them.
Storynest.ai: Unleash Imagination with AI-Powered Interactive Stories
StoryNest.ai is a cutting-edge platform that transforms storytelling into a personalized and interactive experience. With its advanced AI technology, it empowers users to craft unique tales that are tailored to their preferences and creative vision. From choosing characters, settings, and plots to refining the story with options for category, age, and writing style, StoryNest.ai provides a robust set of features to unleash creativity and make every story truly one-of-a-kind.

One of the standout features of StoryNest.ai is the ability to chat with AI characters. This interactive element takes storytelling to a whole new level, allowing users to engage in live conversations with fictional characters and be an integral part of the narrative. Imagine asking a dragon about its adventures or discussing mysteries with a detective.

The platform finds application in various use cases, making it versatile and adaptable. For children, StoryNest.ai serves as a source of entertainment and educational value, fostering imagination, language development, and critical thinking skills. It also caters to adults who seek immersive storytelling experiences, language learning opportunities, or simply a creative outlet to explore their writing skills.

Additionally, StoryNest.ai offers narrated stories that bring the tales to life through expressive and engaging narration. Perfect for bedtime, road trips, or relaxing moments, these narrated stories enhance the auditory experience and further immerse the audience in the magical world of storytelling.

Furthermore, StoryNest.ai supports multiple languages, breaking barriers and ensuring that storytelling is accessible to a global audience. From English to Spanish, Hindi to French, users can ignite their imagination in the language of their choice, creating a truly inclusive and diverse storytelling experience.

In summary, StoryNest.ai is a groundbreaking platform that empowers users to become creators of their own captivating journeys. With its personalized storytelling, interactive character chats, narrated stories, and multilingual support, it sparks creativity, engages the audience, and nurtures a lifelong love for stories. Step into the world of StoryNest.ai and watch your imagination soar.
Seconded. It adds all the functionality that a player SHOULD have e.g. intelligent silence skipping, playback speed, custom start skips, etc.
That's awesome! Thanks for sharing. I'll definitely use that from now on, great work.

One thing I noticed after creating a simple button component was that it does not export the font family of the text within but that might be a Figma limitation.
Mounting images inside a user namespace
yes ... but they "can't wait". If they want it that badly then such a tiny cost would be easily tolerable to get it earlier. Quest 3 pass through is awesome by all counts from the people who have tried it.
That's a lonely hill to die on..
> Is there really any empirical evidence that such people exist and could be helped by an ethics course?

Yes. Many, many people (including me) don't speak up when we see someone else doing something wrong. These ethics courses not only drill home the point of the importance of speaking up, but helpfully give many mechanisms in which one can speak up anonymously, or otherwise in a protected manner.

A hypothetical of a situation the GP may have had in mind would be a person who is thinking of fudging or taking a shortcut, but doesn't want anything bad to happen. Ethics courses can show how minor deviations in ethical practice can have major impacts (jokingly - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dWjKkF0Zi4 ). These courses can also show that actively stopping work for an ethical reason will not be punished or looked down on in any way. Because of this the person will feel confident in checking their initial impulse to fudge and instead do what's right.

Showing people how they can be ethical is just as important as showing them what ethics are. We don't need to be moral heroes in order to take more ethical action.
Of course, you have the "pit crew" do this for a reason. Whatever is getting those dirty is likely getting the driver/operator dirty, as well...
I assume neither of them was a Quest 3 though ...
Was the 1P platform audited by an external entity?
Yeah, that's great. In [1], you can see it (Joan's organ) in its original state. If you follow the youtube playlist, you can see the amount of work it took to get it out and install it. That organ has some 15 stops, many of which are "borrowed" (i.e., the 4" uses the same pipes as the 8", but plays an octave higher), and it doesn't have much wind pressure. So it is small. The organ from the link has 117 ranks, and its pipes extend far beyond Joan's organ, and it fills a hall instead of a small parish, so it is huge. Multiply the work done by Sam Battle (who's behind look mum no computer) by a factor ... 40?

[1] https://metro.co.uk/2021/03/09/house-with-full-organ-built-i...
See data here: https://apps.urban.org/features/naep/

In terms of raw scores, Mississippi is slightly ahead of New York on the NAEP 4th grade math test, and substantially behind on all other tests. But NAEP claims that if you adjust the raw scores by the state's poverty and other disadvantage level, Mississippi would actually be ahead of NY.
The key is that, while there is suspicion (the people arrested have a far left ideology, have been to Syria to fight against the Islamic state, own weapons and encrypt all of their communications), there is no crime nor proof of an intent to commit a crime.

These people have been sent to prison because they are suspicious, not because of an action they have done (something made possible as a special case of an older antiterrorism law). And, amongst other things, using Signal and Linux with the encryption-on settings are explicitly listed as some of the things making them suspicious in the eyes of the law.

That is a slippery slope.
The real question is why to pay $5 for a customer you likely will not see again ?

If the item is expensive enough probably you can offset the cost, but if their basket is worth $10, it makes no sense to subsidize their $5 shipping.

I am thinking of it from the perspective of an EBay seller.
However, one CAN do "object-oriented" programming in C. There are ways of modeling what a piece of data is (a struct with its members). There are ways of modeling how a piece of data can behave (functions operating on those structs/pointers to structs). Perhaps this is lacking in features and expressiveness compared to OOP-first languages like C#, C++ and others, but object-oriented concepts can apply in C - look to the compiler to organize private, public functions and ownership.
My null hypothesis for that golden age from late 1800s til mid-1970s is that they just found all the low hanging fruit? See https://slatestarcodex.com/2016/11/17/the-alzheimer-photo/ for background.

Compare also how even second rate people could do first rate work in the last fifteen years by applying deep learning to new domains.

You mention that war has a certain tendency to cut through bullshit. Ideally, market competition also does some of that. See https://gwern.net/backstop for a more general exploration:

> I suggest interpreting phenomenon as multi-level nested optimization paradigm: many systems can be usefully described as having two (or more) levels where a slow sample-inefficient but ground-truth ‘outer’ loss such as death, bankruptcy, or reproductive fitness, trains & constrains a fast sample-efficient but possibly misguided ‘inner’ loss which is used by learned mechanisms such as neural networks or linear programming group selection perspective.
The plug-ins are for the home environment, customized to be ideal and cover all bases. Like a home office.

The core functionality being available everywhere means a familiar and efficient, even if not ideal and complete, suite is available everywhere else: servers, other computers, a new system. For transient / temporary use. Like on a business trip, a flight, or the conference.
The PS5 also does the eye tracking really well. It still sucks compared to using controllers. The tactile feedback of the buttons along with the very subtle activation motions is a touch beyond gestures. (In particular, they work together. Without the tactile feedback to know you have released a button, it is hard to reengage it fast enough.)
As the author states, ... Svelte Stores are rough. Beyond just missing usage patterns and documentation, we found that several features are lacking, especially when used with native reactivity (`$:`). Another area lacking is TypeScript support.

Our frontend codebase at OKcontract is implemented with Svelte, but we had to build some low-level libraries (including a wholly new implementation of Stores) to make it worthwhile. We're very busy with our main launch now, but plan to open source these libs asap.

PS: We're not using SvelteKit
You know, once you challenged me on this I thought about a bit more and it seems its actually probably pretty hard short of using sonar off the sea floor.

If you use inertial sensors, you're in a moving fluid which really messes up your ability to dead set navigate.

That said, it seems like it would be much easier for a computer to handle this than a person, especially if it had already mapped the area.
Oh my God. Of course I’m presupposing the idea of the omnipotent/omniscient/… God:

> > Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then from whence comes evil?

Because that’s the premise of the problem statement!

> This is an assumption you are making that many (most?) religions do not.

And?
> This is not a thing in C. Linus Torvalds can add a function F that operates on the internals of both FILE and DIR at the same time, for example, and suddenly it's less clear who "owns" F and which one is the object.

It isn’t a thing in a C++ either if one makes all the fields public or if one uses friend.

Member accessibility is not essential to the idea of OOP, since there are OOP languages which don’t have it, or in which it is merely a convention, or something which can be overridden-and a person can use an OOP language which has it yet fail to use it.

So, I don’t think “C lacks private members” is a good argument against C being “OOP”. Especially when C actually has the moral equivalent of “private” given APIs can be based on opaque pointers, so your compilation unit has no idea what the fields or layout of some structure controlled by another is.
The RESF / Rocky Linux project does not sell support contracts. That is a contract for CIQ. Any company is free to sell support services for Rocky Linux (and many do, including OpenLogic, MontaVista, CIQ, TuxCare, etc).