skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Complete speculation: They wanted to see something very very upclose through the glass. While getting in close they managed to scrap some wreckage compromising the carbon fiber body leading it to break and implode. The banging noises are some of the equipment dangling on the Titanic wreckage and blowing in underwater currents occassionally.
Yes, it still is last I checked you just have to dodge a (mild) dark pattern they added suggesting otherwise.
Apple ported Stable Diffusion 1.5/2.1 to MPS themselves.

If they don't so it for SDXL, the port will probably take awhile (if it happens at all).
True! I think it will happen faster and they set the date so far in the future to not encourage a flame war.
Coast Guard Press Conference 3PM EST – Found Debris from OceanGate Titan [video]
Confirmed debris found, official statement from OceanGate that those aboard the vessel have been lost on CNN
I like this. I use vimwiki for my notes, but I'm struggling to get any sort of todo list working these days.

For a while I had some scripts that converted my vimwiki files to html and saved them to Google drive, and it would also find and extract pending todos.

As people have mentioned it requires a laptop with linux and vim on it, which is not very compatible with my work (windows machines) or my phone.

I wonder if buying something like a GPD pocket will solve this.
A fully working chess game in 4K of ROM, using each of the 128 bytes of RAM

MicroChess says hold my 924 byte beer: http://www.benlo.com/microchess/index.html

MicroChess is also believed to be the first home computer software that was available for sale to the public.

I have this on my KIM-1, and I find watching it play itself kind of soothing.
This complements the idea that problem-solving is the essence of intelligence. It's not always about speed, but the quality of decisions made, especially in complex situations
> Everything is a typed object.

That's really good. The fact that the file interface just gives you a string of bytes, with no concept of structure or type safety in the interface itself is a major flow of it. Type safety is immensely valuable.
When I attempted to learn C back in 2016, one of my absolute favorite youtuber teachers was a native Indian (accent n all). His videos were much more detailed and better designed than what was out there at the time. After doing some research on his background, I found out he ended up getting a job at Google and lives in Cali now! Put a smile on my face.
As sibling says, you can make exactly the same mistake and it not colliding just means no join - but if it's an outer join and one of many joins or in a nested query it might not be immediately obvious it's happened, or what the issue is even if it is.
When there is a drought, news fear mongers about it. When the drought is over, the news finds a way to fear monger about it. See the pattern?

I'm not sure which is worse for society, constant advertising, or constant news fear mongering, or constant news fear mongering with advertising! I'd like to see both go away.
I discovered the difference in these two types of students much later than I would have liked: last year of college. I like you, felt like I really needed to understand the material to do well, and I did, but there were so many students at discussion sections and office hours with much shallower understandings who would perform better on exams and assignments. These students often ask questions like, “is it always the case…” looking for a hammer they can apply to all similar problems rather than trying to understand nuances. Learning how to get an A in the course is very different than learning the course material.
If the simulator is as good as the iOS' simulators then you must test your app in a device or you will be flooded with bug reports at launch day. As noted elsewhere, Apple is setting up labs in some cities, everyone else needs to buy the device or cross fingers and hope for the best.

BTW, Android is not as bad because there are emulators, not just simulators (that is my understanding for the disparity).
You can fully self host it (server and everything): https://github.com/revoltchat/self-hosted

This is for folks that want a self-governed / "no big brother" Discord alternative, it's quite nice for that purpose, but it's lacking the Discord integrations (audio chat, etc.) that make it better for gamers.
I have my own selfhosted https://ntfy.sh instance that I use as my UnifiedPush provider (https://unifiedpush.org/), and to me it feels near instant. But I don't have any knowledge about how good this scales or fits your needs.
Many ways, for one: https://magicfusion.github.io/
> Modeling investing as a loan made to a company where the company can choose to not return money at all comes with all sorts of nice properties.

Debt and equity are both modes of investment. We have different words for them because they mean different things. You are not Modeling investing as a loan, you are describing investing in equity.
You can get a free copy of what LexisNexis has on you, just like you can with your credit report. The difference is that the LexisNexis report is book thick for most people. The amount of information far exceeds what the credit bureaus have. In my case, quite a bit of it was wrong but adjacent. It thought I owned a huge commercial building, which was actually owned by the developer of a condo I owned in another part of town. It also showed me making an insurance claim for hail damage on my brother's house. My brother actually did make a claim for hail damage and I did live with him, but that was several years after the insurance claim.
This is one of the most important points IMO that does not seem to be on people's minds. Just because you were the first person to think of making a subreddit about some topic doesn't mean you should perpetually have the power to unilaterally make decisions about the community, its users, and its content.

I am happy this API drama has run the gamut and is now tackling what has always been the true issue head-on: anonymous, first-come first-serve moderators of user communities. I have been on reddit for 15 years. These users have the loudest voice, have historically placed more importance on themselves than there actually is, and have an unhealthy amount of power over the content.

If you've ever been on the wrong side of a power-trip by a moderator, you know what I mean. It's super frustrating to be banned or silenced from a sub because one of the mods didn't like what you said. Here I am, one of thousands of like-minded users wanting to participate in a sub about some topic, but my ability to do so is totally at the whim of this anonymous person who is just another user like me but doesn't have to answer to anyone.

We see time and time again that this power gets into the head of many moderators and they begin to exert personal control over the community. Mod drama on reddit is a taint. "But not all mods are like that." Yes they are, on long timescales. Generalization is useful. Many commenters, here included, miss the big picture. APIs/tools/UI will come and go. Reddit has a large cultural moat and that is a fact. Nitpicking details is petty.

In the context of an upcoming potential IPO, it makes sense for reddit to do the following:

Standardize the subreddits, the rules and terms of use, and consolidate control. Make the reddit experience predictable, not wildly variant at the whims of a handful of mods who control a vastly disproportionate amount of subreddits and content. Replacing mods with AI filters is a prime use case.

I will also look forward to a clampdown on nsfw subreddits. Sexuality is kryptonite to the stock market. And good riddance. Every time I start typing a word on the subreddit search, like 5 different variations of a nsfw sub for that word come up. It's frankly gross. An idea floating around is to jettison the nsfw subs into a separate business that can compete with OF. This is a fine idea.

spez gets a lot of shit for what he says, but at least he's putting his face and name next to his words and taking ownership of them. I don't see any mods or supporters of this 'protest' posting with their name and face. Tells you all you need to know.
Title of article is

'List of websites founded before 1995'.

Lex Fridman just spoke to both Marc Andreesen and Jimmy Wales.
Scroll-Driven-Animations.style
We can’t conserve our way out of this. We have to electrify everything we can, and completely decarbonize our electric grid. To do that, we need to make clean electricity cheaper than fossil electricity, and just as reliable. Spending our focus on trying to convince people to stop consuming energy is a bit counterproductive. Your carbon footprint is almost certainly massive even if you personally use zero electricity, because the supply chain that keeps you alive is extremely carbon intensive. If you run your numbers, I think you’ll find that cars and AC are relatively minor contributors. Heating is much larger for most than either of those, as an example.
I honestly see the company as a startup in idea. They couldn't afford to build a proper deep sea sub so they used the idea of new tech in the form of carbon fiber (which I'm assuming is way cheaper to form vs a titanium hull) and billed this as next gen. Everything that I read almost fits in the idea of "fail fast".
It's an open standardized bytecode that's specifically designed to be easy to implement, which means there are already a lot of different runtimes that implement it, so you're not required to have for example JRE or a .NET runtime installed. Because of this simplicity it is also an easy target to compile to, which means that many languages can already be compiled to it.
A globe IS a map projection. It's the projection of the surface of the planet onto a sphere.
The A1111 backend is kinda not set up for this, as it is built around the old Stability AI 1.5/2.1 implementation (not HF diffusers which most other backends use).

It would basically be a rewrite, if I were to guess... And at that point they mind as well port everything to diffusers.
I'll rephrase. What about this incident supports your claim?

As far as I can see not only is the answer to that is "nothing" but the claim itself is non-falsifiable.
I've never seen it happen before, but, you would know better!
A good real-world example of the consequences of this normalization is British Airways flight 5390 [1]

This problem extended far beyond this one individual, who was merely a symptom. The entire Birmingham maintenance facility, and perhaps British Airways more broadly, had a singular focus on “getting the job done.” If doing the work by the book took longer and jeopardized schedules, then doing the work by the book was discouraged. The shift manager who used the wrong bolts stated in an interview that if he sought out the instructions or used the official parts catalogue on every task, then he would never “get the job done,” as though this was a totally normal and reasonable attitude with which to approach aircraft maintenance. This attitude was in fact normalized on a high level by supervisors who rewarded the employees who most consistently kept planes on schedule. That a serious incident would result from such a culture was inevitable. The shift manager believed it to be reasonable to just “put on whatever bolts came off” and make a quick judgment call about what kind of bolts they were — not because he was personally deficient, but because he had been trained into a culture that didn’t consider this a flagrant safety violation.

[1] https://admiralcloudberg.medium.com/the-near-crash-of-britis...
Are you sure about that?

https://www.livescience.com/chinese-submarine-record-dive.ht...
Yip, but the issue is the depth. The Titanic's at 3800 meters. An average military sub isn't going to hit 1000 meters. So I'm reluctant to make any assumptions about deep search systems.
Framework Laptop 16 Deep Dive – Enclosure
It seems there would still be some sort of interpreter for WASM - meaning any performance gains could have been made using existing bytecode interpreters. I'm probably wrong on that assumption, but am unclear why.

I guess I'm wondering what makes WASM so much better than investing engineering energies into existing things.
The world’s largest democracy is collapsing before our eyes
It all comes down to a clash of worldviews between those who believe that "woman" and "man" are determined by each individual's self-declaration, and those who hold that "woman" and "man" are categories based on being, respectively, of the female or male sex. There's no right or wrong answer to this, so it's not really appropriate to enforce via a Code of Conduct.
Your goal during the ideation phase of those workshops should be to output as many post its as possible in the given time. Output the bad ideas quickly and you'll move along to better ideas much faster when you're not humming and hawing over one post it. You have to be ok with looking slightly crazy however and not mind being linked to your poor ideas.
Really? Feature realease v3.3 was released just last month...

https://blog.vuejs.org/posts/vue-3-3
For the last few weeks, a number of HE.net tunnel users have reported an abundance of CAPTCHA requests, like for every single search homepage visit, which would be consistent with your supposition.
There's some quite different systems programming topics getting conflated here. This assumption that WASM is a competitor to Docker doesn't seem very sensible and it's hard to understand where it comes from. Will Python or Postgres suddenly stop having versioning and installation issues if they run on a WASM interpreter? No, the issues are at the ecosystem level, they're not related to how code is translated for the host CPU.

You can optimize the size of your containers to be pretty small, like tens of megabytes… But WebAssembly is, at its core, designed to be more portable than that.

You’re talking about tens of kilobytes, instead of tens of megabytes. And the boot-up times can be measured in microseconds, instead of milliseconds, or tens of milliseconds, or even seconds (!) for containers.

This paragraph is emblematic: it's mixing up code size, startup time, portability, containers and virtual machines of two different kinds without really linking them together or defining requirements.

The thing is, WASM isn't a new idea. The industry has a lot of experience with VMs that JIT compile portable bytecode. Startup time of any WASM program is going to be dominated by the fact that you're in the interpreter the whole time. As programs get larger they do things like load config files, connect to databases, initialize in-memory caches, possibly reflect themselves because that's often convenient, and so on. Because it's all init code none of this is hot, so it gets interpreted and that's slow. WASM offers nothing in the way of a standard library that could be accelerated, so languages have to bring their own which makes things worse. And the WASM environment is extremely minimalist, so you need to ship a lot of code with your app to make things comfortable especially as most servers aren't written in C++ or Rust and aren't going to be any time soon because that's not their sweet spot.
Yep, the LLMs' "success" starkly shows how little real thinking is actually done by people when writing or talking. Mostly it is just stringing out something that sounds OK.
So teaching your children native languages of their parents as well as letting them play with sounds when they are young "reeks of status signalling" to you.

Obviously not, and I don't see how what I said could be read that way.

It's taking the trouble to write stuff like the original article (in such gushing, self-congratulatory tones) and throwing it up on the internet that reeks of you-know-what.

Especially since these don't sound like self-driven accomplishments on the part of these kids. Or even remotely near it.
Only guitar in that list comes to English from a Spanish etymology, the others come from Arabic via medieval Latin, French and Italian, not Spanish.
You can do this in SD 1.5/2.1 already. Encode the image like you do for pix2pix, and the text, then average those latents together.

Dreambooth is gonna require an A100 I think... I doubt it will work on the free (16GB VRAM) Colab instances.
Right. It's my understanding that two remote submersibles that arrived earlier were lost trying to reach the sea floor—they weren't rated for the depth but the attempts were made anyway. (Don't have a link, I think it was nytimes)
No I mean like when you open your maps application and want to go somewhere with GPS, latitude and longitude will be vertical and horizontal and proportionally spaced due to the map using a projection like Mercator...
Headless API First Issue Tracker
Me and my friend are brainstorming with an idea to build an issue tracker that will be headless. It can be deployed using yaml files where admin can define the configurations.
System will keep track of previous configurations

History of issue data will be preserved

Configurations can be deployed from dev to staging to production

Each component in the system will have a service. For example user management, configuration management, business logic etc

It will be available on cloud and on prem and using distributed infrastructure like Kubernetes and can be deployed on AWS or Azure

We will build clients for web, Slack and teams

The system will be extensible, developers can write their plugins

This is just an idea and we are trying to get some initial feedback on whether all this make sense, are there any other similar tools in the market and are we trying to solve any problem or not?
It’s been a while since physics for me, but I was under the impression that this only really applies when pressure is greater inside the solid shape. In this case, it seems roughly equivalent to pulling a vacuum inside a soda can at sea level, which fairs quite poorly for the soda can, and I cannot imagine an unfortified sphere-ish shape performing better.
I don’t know why people moderate reddits. I don’t think “paying by volunteering” is the right model. It seems more like a really weird F2P game or hobby.

If people are using the site to advertise stuff, they have an incentive to try and make the experience nice. But is that really the main source of mods? I imagine if I was moderating as a sort of work related thing I’d be more focused on just fulfilling the requirements of my employer (rather than maintaining the general community spirit of the site, if that makes sense).
Maybe the stolen cars are taken to a chop shop or ditched before the owner even realizes it has been stolen.
Yeah, I'll have no answer the first day of mulling over a complex problem, but often I'll have an excellent answer the next day.

It's worked well for my own work, but sometimes people are surprised that the slow seeming person, me, has useful ideas.
That is a submersible. Military submarines (things that can travel thousands of miles, support themselves, have weapons, etc) appear to bottom out at ~2000m. At least one US military sub imploded well above 2000m.
It's a basic "divide et impera" - the first thing you do to break a strike is trying to delegitimize the leadership's mandate.
I'm a controls engineer, and I deal with people like this all the time while developing safety systems for industrial automation.

"It's safe if you don't do something stupid."

"Those [generic components] should be reliable enough, they often last for years."

"It's a good thing you didn't see the chainsaw work I did at my house last weekend"

"I'd feel perfectly comfortable with that machine if I was going to stand there"

"We've always done it that way"

When you're getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to deliver a machine, or using that machine to make millions of dollars worth of product, fighting about a $200 safety relay or $800 light curtain is not the same risk analysis as lighting fireworks in your backyard. Because it's not about your risk, it's about the risk of the new high school grad with no options except a $15/hr factory position, who has neither the knowledge nor the freedom to mitigate that risk.
I think we agree, but maybe I wasn't writing clearly.

You're describing building a green field app starting from nothing, step by step. GPT shines at things like this, because they are by definition small code bases. You can probably fit the whole codebase into the context window.

Also, your approach of walking it through step-by-step is perfect, since you get to guide it to build a wise code architecture as you go.

It's hard to naively point GPT at a big, existing repo and try and do non-trivial changes to that codebase. Without a bunch of tooling to help it understand the overall codebase, it won't understand or respect the existing modules, abstractions, etc. It will just start trying to write code in a vacuum, which probably isn't the right thing to do when modifying an existing codebase.
Just a hunch, but do you find that you perform substantially better if you are an environment where you can talk to yourself out loud as you work through a math or physics problem? If so, this is very much indicative of the phenomenon I'm describing, because what's happening is you're recruiting your audio memory as a compensatory short-term workspace, being able to loop some 2 or 3 additional elements of information in this extra area essentially acts as an extension of your working store. And guess what behavior students are typically prohibited or highly discouraged from doing during an exam?

I further suspect that this is also the mechanism responsible for some people's apparent tendency to do all the talking in a conversation, rather than allow a balanced share of time between conversants. The quick decay of short-term information requires constant refreshing, and talking is one means of augmenting this.
I guess I didn't realize Sublime has had LSP packages for a while now, though IIUC it still doesn't support it out of the box
seems like the longest thread is Windows by the same reasoning?
Different UUID generators for different use cases! I'm also a fan of v5 for generating stable identifiers, when tracking things such as DNS names or URLs. Useful in web crawlers, host inventories, etc.
I'd approach it the other way around: find good teachers, and trust them to choose the tools they use.
The average human is more likely to die driving to the supermarket than in a commercial jet airliner crash, so I don't know how useful any of these comparisons are, especially for laymen.

We're comparing technology where safety is measured in incidents per hundred million miles traveled to one where the total number of annual travelers can fit into a single jumbo jet.