skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The most likely first failure is the window. At that instant a rapid turbulent fill event would occur. The outside pressure and the hole diameter will provide a calculable interval for the internal volume to fill. At 12,000 feet = 800 atmospheres, this would be on the order of 1/20th of a second, with intense crush/shear forces = instant death as perceived. That interval can be related to the speed of sound and wavelength to make a variable frequency 'chirp' that would be of low to higher frequency. The low frequency would be in the low hertz as an estimate. At the same time inner pressure and temperature would rise to 800 atmospheres and a temperature a little above ambient. The density of water is around 800 times that of air = 800 times the weight of water would enter compared to the weight of the air within. Local temperature would prevail, increased a little by the work of compression of that air to higher pressure(quite high in concept, but quenched by 800 x mass of water.
Thus the sound will not be very loud or high in frequency.
A sphere of C4 will make a compression wave at somewhere over 500,000 atmosphere propagating at about 4000 meters/second = fourier square wave containing all the odd order harmonics all the way down = heard round the world. Any transient inrush plasma would be swamped and mixed with cold water = transient and of little consequence.
Banging? One would hope nobody would dare bang the window, but it is conceivable they might have banged the hull in desperation if the window did not crack to attract attention? Did the noise cease at some point? or is the noise still hearable = not them?
What company decided to use chroot this way? I'm going to guess its Microsoft, but I think thats not either entirely correct or I'm off base
Ever use a fish finder / depth finder? A narrow beam is sent in one direction, generally down, and reflections back are calculated. I would imagine that was the start of their search.
After enough time or support: military grade sonar? https://man.fas.org/dod-101/navy/docs/es310/SNR_PROP/snr_pro...
Yet we won’t lose that history if Reddit loses its users and mods. New history will be found in the same place as old - surfaced via Google (discord excluded).
If you were around ~25 years ago, you likely remember the idea that JVM will run everywhere and replace everything. (And some XML on top.)

Indeed, JVM can run everywhere, and has reached far and wide, from SIM cards to huge servers. But it has not replaced all other runtimes, even when it achieved really good GC and and near-native speed thanks to JIT compilation.

WASM is very similar to JVM in many regards. It will reach far and wide, it will supplant a few things, but I bet it's not going to replace too many things, let alone native code in containers.
An amount that doesn't mean immediate death to all third-party apps would be a good start.

I don't know what the right number is, but Reddit has made it abundantly clear with this move that they aren't interested in finding it.

Honestly, I doubt there is one anymore (for me at least). Any trust I had for their corporate leadership before has completely evaporated. If they were to lower the prices to a "reasonable" level now it would indicate that they either capitulated (but didn't get to do what they really wanted and probably will try again later) or they are just being manipulative and wanted to use this as a way to show "goodwill" by bringing the price down.

The concept of the fediverse these days has me hopeful for a time where we don't need to worry about these big dumb corporate interests holding our data and the control over it hostage. Any publicly owned (or private trying to go public) organization with a profit incentive is bound to make stupid, short-term decisions eventually, and this is just one of many of Reddit's forays into that arena. They will continue to get worse and worse, regardless of how effective the protesting is.
Winterhelm: Notion-like interface for LLM agents [video]
My understanding is that the goal (if not there already) is that you can use wasm tech just like docker/etc. The value prop is wasm would be lighter and have other built in benefits with the adoption of newer browser (security) features like sandboxed file system integration. This would be made available without the overhead of chrome per se. forgive me if I overstate something but this is the gist.
"with an open release coming mid-July"
> These LLMs can't tell facts from BS now.

I think this is severely overstated as a problem that would prevent LLMs from being useful. LLMs generate BS if you use them like a search engine, but there are lots of use cases where they don't.

Need to summarize a document or rephrase something in a different tone? Hallucination is really a non-issue.

I've used LLMs to write scripts - while hallucination does happen, it's a situation where I can easily validate that the scripts are doing what I would expect, so hallucination isn't a serious issue.
It's funny, because growing up I thought LexisNexis were just one of those guys I'd use to find academic articles from the school library system, like JSTOR.

Then I got employed by the collections industry straight out of college and found out what skiptracing is. There used to be quite a few skiptracing vendors: Accurint, Banko, FastData, to name a few. LexisNexis bought all of them. I imagine that the dossier they have on the average person dwarfs what the credit bureaus have.
Conceptually similar, there was also the ANS synthesizer [1] designed by the Soviet engineer Evgeny Murzin. Unlike the Mellotron, it was opto-electronic, giving the composer more direct access and control over the "samples". Waveforms were drawn on glass plates, and pressing one of the keys would scan across the associated plate, feeding the generated signal through various filters, etc.

It features prominently in the soundtrack by Eduard Artemyev, for the historical film Siberiade from 1979. [2]

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANS_synthesizer

[2] https://youtube.com/watch?v=sJj9y4t9UnU
Yes I have many reddit accounts without an associated email.
That's very likely. A lot of RedHat customers buy RHEL to run Oracle Database on it, they'd be stupid to piss them off.
RMS Titanic: Engineering Facts (Bill Hammack – Enginnerguy) [video]
> Every subreddit is just a click away from moving

Are they?

I have not seen any of the moderators quit , nor any communities being able to migrate elsewhere.

The funny thing is that many communities created polls, which voted for indefinite shutdowns. Now moderators are having withdrawal symptoms and asking their community again, and they are voting again to shut it down. There are some very real neurotic effects there.

Reddit provides a unique space that is quirky enough for redditors. Moderators have ruined the communities since many years ago, but unfortunately there is no other place that values spontaneous order similar to reddit.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/archive/refs/tags/@...

I get a: "404: Not Found" from the site "codeload.github.com"
I've used OneSignal for several iOS projects - extremely good documentation
It’s not a matter of opinion though look it up.
Yes, also people dramatically undervalue how substantial the absence of data is when it comes to profiling someone. Especially when you compare it to other data points, for example not having credit cards on record is enough information to start building a whole lot of other connections.
The double double is living up to its name.
Again, your post does come across as political debate based on very vague things you have read on the internet, and not the actual literature in the field. I am baffled by your supposition that superior numbers are required for language shift to occur: this has not been believed for many decades now and is regarded as an elementary fallacy. And what I already mentioned above about Aromanian makes unsound your vision of two separate Proto-Romanians on either side of the Danube.

In general, I don’t see the point to debate further, because debate is not something that occurs on general-public internet fora like this. It is something that occurs in the appropriate scholarly venues. My original post up above aimed to emphasize that the contemporary consensus within linguistics – though it is only very slowly trickling into popular-science publications – does not see a role for “Dacian” in the Albanian–Romanian lexical isoglosses, and that has some important consequences for the reconstruction of Balkan linguistic history. That emerging consensus exists regardless of what you or I write here.

And since you are a representative of one of the peoples involved in a political squabble, it might be best for you to sit this out: in general in linguistics, it is often people from outside a region that do the best work on that region’s linguistic history, since they have no dog in the regional ethnic battles.
But these restrictions are on the account not the code?
This will probably end up in court anyway.
Further evidence that being a billionaire isn't well correlated with being a genius.
Yup.

Meanwhile, smart organizations have decades-ago stopped tracking (primarily) "Time-Lost Work Accidents" and replaced that with tracking "Close Calls".

I've seen prominent signs for "N Days Since a Time Lost Accident", and more recently "X Days Since a Close Call".

Sadly, it is so obvious that this CEO clown was doing everything possible to avoid experienced people ("not as inspiring to hire 50yo white guys as hiring young upstarts") so he could overrule any safety or redundancy concerns, firing people as soon as they raised things like "this porthole window is only rated to 1500m and we're going to 4000m", using cheap scrap scaffolding as ballast, and completely ignoring any kind of redundancy in case something went wrong. He seems to have gotten a just end, but his deceived customers didn't deserve that.
embrace, extend, extinguish.
Learn everything you can about cleaning/standardizing datasets and the boots-on-the-ground process of labeling data and training algorithms. These are fundamental, and are often overlooked and undervalued.
Related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKA4w2O61Xo

TL;DW:

I have a rule and you need to figure it out. The rule relates to a sequence of three numbers. You can propose a sequence and I’ll tell you yes/no if it meets the rule.

I’ll give you the first sequence to get you started:

sequence: 2,4,8
passes: Yes
Greg Egan is a true genius, and I don't use that word lightly. He's a true polymath. In another era, I suspect he could have been one of the leading scientist/mathematician/philosopher of his time.

One comparison I really like: Johannes Kepler -- he figured out planetary orbits _and_ wrote one of the fist (if not the first) SciFi novels. Oh and he saved his mother's life when she was accused of witchcraft -- a parallel to Egan's work regarding the indigenous Australian population.

I sometimes wonder though whether people like Egan are properly appreciated in the modern age. So much noise and competition for attention...
Kinda weird that they didn't have an optical cable tether tbh.
I think people are overreading into this, assuming the results even mean much anyway. people who score higher on timed tests which corelate well with IQ, such as the Wonderlic or the SATs, are smarter.
I tried it out and was surprised how well it worked on a photograph my friend sent me over WhatsApp the other day (pretty sure WhatsApp downsampled/applied extra compression).

I'm definitely at least considering purchasing the paid version for $5:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.luksapps.i...

Really nice job, sir.

By the way, do you plan to create versions for iOS and/or iPadOS?
The resolution of the Vision is probably not high enough for that. The Micro-OLED screens themselves are something like 4k, but that's stretched over the entire field of view. The CRT screen would cover just a small fraction of that.
I agree, there's a solid case to be made for "archiving requires additional work" compared to "archived by default with very high effort required to escape it" like most of the web today; just look at the recent discussions of the US government buying up various databases of personal data. Few people would want that to include what they said when they were 15 and bored.

Course, the bigger problem with centralized corporate services is that discord themselves could be shipping off that data on the backend to god knows who... but from the "protect me from other individual harassing me forever about shit I said once" front, Discord has some obvious appeal.
While I've only briefly examined the WebAssembly (WASM) security model, it seems like a recurrence of vx32 and NaCL. One inherent issue is the "glue" code enabling the WASM runtime to invoke necessary operating system (OS) primitives, such as memory allocation, file system and network access.

The appeal of vx32/NaCL/WASM lies in its bytecode (or verified x86 asm stream), which cannot operate independently due to its lack of access to syscalls or other inter-process communication (IPC). However, a program without syscall access is essentially futile, limited to using the CPU's arithmetic logic unit, reading/writing memory, and potentially handling input/output buffers.

Soon enough, developers will require access to modern amenities offered by OSes such as memory mapping, file descriptors, and async IO. Consequently, OS bridge creators will supply proxies to the kernel, some of which will be improperly implemented. Given their complexity and size, these proxies may essentially become exploitable mini OSes.

There's no perfect sandboxing, some forms appear more trustworthy (or more thoroughly scrutinized by researchers) than others. WASM may seem safer than vx32/NaCL because it lacks bytecode verification issues; the bytecode is fully understood, unlike verifying x86 instructions (which are prone to erratas). However, the bridge/glue/proxy/broker problem remains unavoidable.
Google is famous for statically linking everything.
You're misreading me.

I asked what about that link made them think that. The answer nothing.

They were making up explanations about how to maintain a pre-existing belief.
Megaupload Fugitive Arrested by Armed Police 11 Years After the Raid
Neat experiment. Although, I was able to guess a higher than average number of dots correctly, I wonder if I would feel differently had I been under the average.

The explanation given at the end is interestingly to me. However, consider the following alternate: People more likely to answer honestly that they view others opinions as wrong or immoral (ie they would appear to have dogmatic thinking) are also people who consider the easy dot guesses as cheating and desire to avoid cheating. Whereas people who are more likely to want to win the dot guessing by any means are also more likely to lie about their negative views about the opinions of others.
> Grsecurity operated under a similar arrangement back in the day.

Weren't they violating the GPL too? https://perens.com/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-c...
Congrats on the launch! If I understand it right you’re interested in collecting this usage data both to bill external clients but also to much more granularly understand the infra costs of a particular feature/product/team? Very cool. Do you have any good examples of the internal usage one? How much do big companies actually care about this?
i imagine this is probably the healthier/much better approach to learning anything. unfortunately society mostly prioritizes extreme speed and shallow understanding of anything due to the upside of moving quickly and making numbers go up at the end of a quarter.
Brussels to allow installation of spyware on journalists’ phones and laptops
2 years ago matrix did not have voice rooms. Now we have video rooms.

How far stuff moves forward in short time.
Carbon fiber seems like a weird choice for this application anyway because its big advantage is in its tensile strength compared to its weight.

Here, it’s in compression, not tension. And its light weight doesn’t matter.
For me I didn't cancel my account, I just gradually stopped shopping there since the results were full of dropshippers selling identical crappy products, making it impossible to find anything in decent quality and even if you do, i stopped trusting that the products I would receive wouldn't be fake. I used to order a lot on amazon, now I do it about twice a year.
Unfortunately, crt.sh is chronically overloaded.
To Find Life in the Universe, Find the Computation
It's doubtful he'll still inspire anyone where he's now.
I have literally never once heard language like that from DEI professionals; in every context I've encountered them, they've basically been an emissary of HR and had a "be nice but don't rock the boat" mentality, for better or for worse.

And I'm speaking as someone who falls into several ""diverse"" hiring categories. As much as I appreciate the philosophy of DEI work, I personally find most of it pretty toothless. There have even been multiple instances of myself and other rank-and-file coworkers trying to have discussions about bigotry at large (not even in the workplace itself), only to be shut down by those very same DEI coordinators under the guise of "let's use kind words instead of unkind words," because it's not good HR-speak to call a spade a spade.

Like, these are people employeed by huge corporate entities, not radical freedom fighters. A lot of it is just image work to make sure your company doesn't do or say shit that makes you look bad.
Also - Pro: Excellent realistic training opportunity to maintain and upgrade skills
Red Hat isn't imposing further restrictions. You are free to do with the source code whatever you wish, but the GPL nor any court can force Red Hat to give or sell you binaries in the future and thus source code in the future.

An example of an illegal restriction would be if Red Hat gave their binaries to everyone publicly but only their source to people who agreed to not redistribute it, and then if you did redistribute the source they cut you off or brought some type of legal action.
This gets parroted a lot but it's the wrong way to look at it. The Fediverse doesn't need to "win". It just needs to be good enough for those of us who use it.
As someone who previously made millions of dollars and is now reduced to a single broken suitcase[*] for all his possessions and is homeless, living in a sleeping bag, this article resonates with me. I help a lot of other homeless people and it is very, very hard to totally reboot your life when all you have in the world is the one set of dirty clothes on your back.

[*] it was a wheelie suitcase I found, but I wore the wheels completely off it carrying cans of food from the food pantries for everyone.
The correlation of locality and sequential keys was a coincidence. It's unfortunate that folks rely on this coincidence for performance. Databases can be made with better algorithms now that UUIDs are common. It would be a mistake to enshrine sequential indexes as some special optimization, just to be blown away later when better algorithms get used.
A WASM runtime can be dramatically smaller, which may be important in some scenarios.

WASM runtimes should grow to a maturity level somehow comparable to V8, JVM, .NET runtimes before they start competing with them. Currently WASM accompanies other software, and I find it pretty correct.
Maybe there's a miscommunication here; detecting underwater sound from hundreds, even thousands of kilometers away, is made possible via the publicly known laws of physics.

Detecting extraterrestrial aliens requires technology that is not publicly known. Therefore, it is not at all logical to compare "hearing an imploding submersible in the Atlantic" to "detecting aliens/UFOs"
1) Elon Musk is not the sole owner of private Twitter. He still has a fiduciary duty to his other investors.

2) Even if it were wholly owned a corporation is still not the same entity as the owner. Using a wholly owned corporation for personal benefit is a direct violation of the corporate veil. That is a violation of corporate structure and usage as such means Elon Musk should be personally liable for the entirety of Twitter and its action.
In this case, "find . | grep".
Transparency in Physical Review Articles
My guess is low precision support, or some newer ops Pascal does not support in a custom CUDA kernel.
because the distance is so far that the sub even departing a few degrees from its intended destination means it can be anywhere along a huge swath of the sea floor, plus it's pitch dark and very far and cold and inhospitable to both human and machines.

drop a penny into a swimming pool vs drop it into the ocean.
We at zenskar.com are building a billing platform that can plug into your metering store (in addition to the traditional api way) and generate invoices for your customers. We have a query layer that can be used to define aggregates that in turn can be used to create invoices. I will reach out to you on email to see if we can solve your problems.
wasm doesn't give you a vm, it gives you a process
I don't know and I'm not an SME, but it would seem weight always matter? For carrying, for bubbling up, etc.?
From the text: "While Physical Review readers are well aware that the many minutiæ of procedures, computations, and synthesis may be omitted in any particular dispatch, in this publication the intellectual property of the authors' employer has prevented the release of some parameters of the studied devices that may be needed in order to reproduce them. As a reflection of the traditional values of the scholarly community, this is not in accordance with the usual norms of the Physical Review journals."
Maybe we’re looking at different graphs. The one I saw indicated that 79% of respondents were in Ireland, followed by the UK and US (likely Irish citizens living abroad). But no, they didn’t break it down into favorable or unfavorable responses. That’s been done by others looking at the responses.

No need for catty the catty response. It doesn’t matter if it was about this specific legislation. It was about the entire concept behind it. I can find more polls which will show similar results, and I’m sure they all have things you can nitpick. It the fact is that all available data, whatever the quality, supports my position. If there’s such an outpouring of public support, surely that would be worth documenting. Something which supporters of these laws pointedly have avoided doing.
0.02s of CPU time (average case) won’t make a measurable difference.
I always find it so strange and a little creepy to treat "intelligent" as a category like "brown haired" or "diabetic."

You take a test and receive a score (an "intelligence score" apparently) and if you are past X points you are intelligent. Now you are among the set of intelligent people in the world.

I know this is an agreed upon reality (especially among us nerdy types), but it always rubbed me the wrong way. Even bracketing off all the very real issues around measurement tools here, it always felt in general like neurotic pursuit to quantify the qualitative, or even an egoistic pursuit to claim superiority out of thin air.

And I read articles like these, and I can't help but feel slightly validated despite their presuppositions: maybe there isnt a spectrum of intelligences, but just heterogenous minds. We have come up with these tests, but they just show how well a person is at that test that we happen to call "an intelligence test." But you start digging deeply with the numbers... and of course you going to get counter intuitive results! You have investigated categories that are themselves sustained out of thinnest of scientific consensus and dubious ideological origins, delegating your measurement to fraught tools laden with cultural specificity. It just feels crazy to me, it feels like never leaving grade school.

But maybe they'll find "intelligence" one day, and then I'll have to eat my shoe while waiting in line to be recycled because I didn't pass muster as an intelligent human.