skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Bingo. The display is invisible until I pop in reverse, then it lights up through the mirror and takes up they left half. Not as big as an infotainment version, but sufficient.

Sorry for the Amazon link, but I haven't had enough coffee to Google better:
https://www.amazon.com/AUTO-VOX-T2-Monitor-Waterproof-Revers...

The videos in the reviews do a better job than the actual product videos of showing what is going on.
New York City Subway Stairs (2012)
Dupe.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36445855
A little dissapointed to see ProseMirror not mentioned.

It's an amazing rich-text editing toolkit that provides all the bits and pieces needed to write any kind of rich-text editor. Tiptap is a wrapper over ProseMirror for minimizing the vast API surface and providing simpler configurations.

The project is using TipTap and that is mentioned.

https://prosemirror.net
Usually the real answer is that it isn't actually $50k for a trash can. In something like an airplane, there's a whole bunch of costs that are overhead on the plane itself without being attached to any particular part (delivery, integrated testing, R&D, whatever). The accounting convention is that the overhead gets spread out amongst the individual items. The side effect of this convention is that if you view a line item without context, you get something utterly nonsensical.

It's absolutely possible to apply some level of basic human reason and common sense to such situations. A different accounting convention is probably in order.
They see that it's stupid and they have all the same reason and common sense as anyone else. They just worry that if they don't follow the rules they'll go to jail.
> You learn to use stable references in callback functions, to be careful using Context, and so on. But the list is not short, and it only grows.

It doesn't though. React adds new features that are optional and everyone goes "Pfft, I'm moving to Vue because they added [blank]" I've got old React projects that still work fine.

There are languages/frameworks that move fast and break things and then there are languages that just move fast. And Javascript itself is also very backwards compatible. You could still just be using class components and Redux and be fine. I have no interest in these server components right now.
Nope. Tracepoint eBPF programs require root to load always. For eBPF you select a program type, and that limits what you can do (aka what helper functions are available to you) and what privileges are required.
Can only imagine what complex parts of the aircraft cost. If an empty metal/plastic box is 50k, what does it cost to replace a hydraulic pump or an electronic board in the avionics?
I've had the same experience. Played multiple times, once for almost a year. The only thing that kept me playing that long was the good group of people on voice comms. I quit for the last time when I realized that life is too short to waste on a game I wasn't even enjoying (and that, frankly, stressed me out.)
> I'd think, scores going back to what they were when teacher compensation was better, is what the voters might hope to get out of the deal.

What is the value proposition in seeing higher scores? It does not appear the population sees value in scores in general. I am not aware of them dumping millions into pinball to see someone reach a high score, for example.

Compensation comes from trade. Someone else has to give in order from someone else to get. If you are going to give up something you hold near and dear, you are going to want something in return. How much is one really going to give up to be able to say "Look ma, a larger number!"?

Is that worth an extra hour at work? One less vacation to your favourite destination? One less cup of coffee? I struggle to want to give up anything for a number, frankly. I guess I'm just not that enthralled by numbers. The are a useful tool, but just a tool in my mind.
In a white-rabbit network you don't need atomic clocks on each node. One atomic clock is enough, its frequency is distributed over the network.
> Train an LLM on Xc and it's accuracy on judging Y entailed by Xp is random.

Why? This is obviously wrong in general case. For that to be true Xp and Xc has to have no statistical relationship whatsoever, which statistically is virtually impossible.
Perhaps this is true for some texts, but take a look at math journals where mathematicians are writing for other mathematicians within their own field. They reuse symbols, sometime an integral symbol is for Riemann integration and sometimes it's for Lebesgue integration. The subject of the paper will make it clear which is which.

Even in our own field, Computer Science, there are too many confusing cases: Knuth uses |S| to mean the cardinality of set S, |f| to be the number of solutions when f is a boolean, |x| to be the absolute value of x, |z| to be the absolute value of a complex number, and |a| to be the length of a. All within the same book, TAOCP vol 4A Part 1.
I've seen the fall in arithmetical capabilities. But I've also seen that largely in myself. Oddly, I think credit cards and never having to make change for things is a big driver in that. To wit, you get worse at the things you don't have to regularly do.

Interesting point on the differences in the percentiles. I'd hazard that speaks more to exposure? Could be bias in what I was able to see, but I know every richer person I knew was able to get their kids in a private school, often with a personal tutor, during the '20 chaos.

I should say, thanks for sticking on this thread! Interesting conversation.
I can tell you're a bit defensive about this, so let me be clear as possible: talk to a lawyer.

I am not a lawyer myself, though I consult with Swiss/German lawyers quite often regarding licensing because it is a large part of my role.

The fragment I mentioned is the beginning of section "E”; this document is using letters as the top level section separator, so using a different letter from the prior is taken as an intentional separation for the purposes of a legal document, what you are referring to is from section "D"; IE they are in a different context from each other entirely.

Even then, you do not need to have a license to automatically process source code, as per the text of this ToS.

There are more than a few points where they talk about what they have the rights to read, and there is only one point (which is legally required to be there, fwiw) which states they can't release your source code as if it's theirs.

If you read the copilot terms of service, they are not granting license to use the suggestions.

A very pessimistic take is that they are quite legally protected from using source code derived from these repositories, even if there wasn't the muddy discussion about training data and derivation.
War is messy when it comes to free market...

Pentagon: "Oh hey, I need special bolt X"

FreeMarket: "Sorry, was too expensive to make that here so we're making special bolt X in China"

Pentagon: "Um, but we are shooting China right now"

FreeMarket: "Don't worry I can get a production line setup in 3 months for 100 million dollars"

Pentagon: "But I need special bolt X TODAY!"
Recently discovered that this is the song playing on the radio in the crashed car you find near the end of the Doom map MyHouse.wad - because of course it is
Ask HN: I have a Y2K style bug, 3 to 4 digits, what is the best process to fix?
We have 40 programs that use this, not all programs have testing. We also have a completely unrelated thing due in 2 weeks.

If I don't have time to write tests for everything, run each program, or read all of the code: What would you do?

(Bonus points if you don't say quit the company)
Indeed seasoned professionals in general tend to ask more questions in spite of one’s body features.
How do you think they provide all the services they provide? Secrets scanning, contextual source information, everything. I'm not sure how anyone could have gone this long and been surprised by this.

Next people will be surprised that GitHub has the right to show your source code on a website....
(Not a lawyer)

Section 20: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/section/20

That does not call out in its table any reference to software. I can't see anything in it which would effect a binding to software products. Section 22 refers to regulations being able to define what are "auxiliary aids", so in theory an SI may have done so.

Scanning the whole Act, the closest thing I can spot is Schedule 25: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/schedule/25, however even that defines it as “any service normally provided for remuneration, [...]". Note that is for an online Service, not a Good (which software would generally be). I've also not found what references it.

So that may cover a web site, but only if it was a paid for thing (e.g. online newspaper sites accessed via subscription). I wonder if and how it applies to the likes of Amazon, where the site itself is not paid for, but goods available through it are.

So unless someone can find specific references, I see no reason to believe there is such a statutory requirement in existence for software, certainly not for free software.
Important and relevant piece of information: IEEE 1588-2019 HA (default profile) is interoperable with White Rabbit. Unfortunately I haven't seen any commercial support for this yet.
To be fair, though, AI summaries don't have to win Pulitzers. They just have to be roughly comparable to existing local reporting of city measures, which are often bad or nonexistent to begin with.

As for context, ideally you could feed it any relevant histories (measures proposed, previous articles, pre/past meeting transcripts etc.)

Given the same input contexts, I'd probably trust the AI analysis more than your average small town journalist. For interviews though, yeah probably a human would be more accepted, but they rarely do those for public meetings.
A submarine made out of carbon fibre material built by a company that openly bragged about using off the shelf components to reduce costs, refused to hire domain experts and fired its director of marine operations for voicing concerns over safety, cutting corners? Say it ain't so. Despite James Cameron being known for his films, people forget he's been actively involved in the development of deep sea submersibles. He's been to the Titanic wreckage site more times than most. Paul-Henri Nargeolet who tragically died on this experimental sub has made 35 trips, Cameron has made 33.

It's not even an accusation at this point, it's the truth. And Cameron is more knowledgeable about this subject than most. The reality is deep sea submersible technology is still an underdeveloped field, evident by the fact few vessels exist that can take humans to such depths and even unmanned vehicles are far few and between.
It would demonstrate to the public what a real expert like Peter Hotez or Paul Offit is next to an ambulance chaser like RFK. RFK is the most prominent anti-vaxxer around. Humiliating him would cut the legs of the movement.

This was also a huge loss for charity. The $3M could have helped a lot of people.
So is a jailbreak coming soon?
Also means that there are way fewer airframes to spread development costs across.

Looks like we both read it, but not all of us understood the implications of it.
That's true yes. Most of the Path of Building stuff is datamined and/or tested ingame. Interesting that they declined the shop idea, guess they dislike people touching anything to do with their monetization.
Anyone sharing the disappointment with NextJS, please have a second look at https://www.meteor.com/ again. It is much more powerful in terms of backend/frontend communication and reactivity, and even though there was a huge downturn some years ago, its picking up steam again. Importantly: it has been around for roughly a decade now and in most cases "just works", and you can even pick the frontend lib you like (react/vue/svelte/...) or swap it later on, so no _hard_ coupling to react. I blogged about it a while ago (https://anonyfox.com/blog/the-renaissance-of-meteor-js/) and things are getting even better now. There are still rough edges, but central points like SSR that "just works" with "useTracker" is there.
One of the death was CEO of the company that operated this way, so some criticism of death will be necessary in the fall-up.
Time for small claims court?
Humans come in all shapes and forms of sensory as well as cognitive abilities. Our true ability to be human comes from objectives (derived from biological and socially bound complex systems) that drive us, feedback loops (ability to morph / affect the goals) and continuous sensory capabilities.

Reasoning is just prediction with memory towards an objective.

Once large models have these perpetual operating sensory loops with objective functions, the ability to distinguish model powered intelligence and human like intelligence tends to drop.
Most people in the world would regard the Pinetab-V with quad core 1.5 GHz dual issue CPU -- around 8,000 to 9,000 MIPS in total -- as either unusably slow or barely usable. It's somewhere around a late 2000s PC in performance.

Your FPGA solution will be around 50 MIPS. That's around a 1992 486dx2.

If you're happy to run something akin to Windows 3.11 then that will be fine.
"Hey we heard a loud boom that may or may not mean your family is dead, and we have no other source of confirmation at this point but just stew on that for a few days while we try to confirm."

Do you have NO empathy? Why would they tell the family they think everyone is dead without verifiable proof and within the window in which they could still be alive? (4 days of oxygen). What is the benefit beyond a bunch of virtual gawkers getting slightly more information slightly quicker?
Emergence of machine intelligence* and its control by Capital was not foreseen by Karl Marx, and the intervening period between heat death of Capitalist system and the Workers Utopia has been indefinitely extended.

* pure transformation of energy into labor
The point actually is, if we are shooting at China for one reason or another we would be getting zero trash cans from them.
Sure but the T&Cs are written such that even the .1% makes him subject to termination and that's kind of the point.

If you write the rules (or laws) such that everyone is breaking them but then chose when and how to enforce those laws you can selectively enforce them against specific people or specific kinds of people. You're terminating him for a totally legitimate not-at-all-dystopian reason when obviously the real motivation is something else entirely. You just weren't looking to see if anyone else committed the crime.
You won't believe these 7 corners that James Cameron says OceanGate cut
Everyone on the sub was literally that demographics ...
He's just got a lot of energy.
Or, a quick-and-dirty bag-of-words approach: https://github.com/nsrivast/whenwhere
Every time I've seen a project get targeted by these CoCs, all the maintainers approach it from a good place assuming no malice

That unfortunately just shows how naive the average person has become.

Anyone else notice that all of this identity politics stuff seems to mainly infect projects in more "accessible" languages? I've heard about it in Javascript, PHP, Python, Ruby, etc. but not much in C/C++ and basically none in Asm. The sibling comment here about SQLite's response (a pure C project) to this trolling provides a great contrast. People and projects solidly focused on technical stuff know better.
Or the government can pay people to build better infrastructure instead.
If you've ever played eve you realize that the most critical skill in the game is spreadsheet usage.

I'll bet Martin Shkreli would dominate at that game. (Yes, that Shkreli: search him on YouTube and marvel at his excel skills.)
No. My understanding is that if its something the agency is buying from an external contractor that's too easy to get flagged in an audit and they use other sorts of expenses for shifting money to black projects. At least that's what I get form reading descriptions of the practice in books like Blind Man's Bluff.
I don't think our public discourse is really steeped in truth or reality anymore, sadly. It doesn't really matter who said or did what when politicking and mass emotional manipulation win the day.

There's no lack of existing thoughtful analysis. It's just ignored more often than not.
> They're paying for people to design, tool, and maintain that design. It's economic investment in people and skills, not necessarily just the finished product.

Wrong - almost all of the profits go to the shareholders of those contractors. The people who are actually doing thew work do not get paid more.

Shit like this is the tip of the iceberg. [1]

[1] https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2022/11/22/why-cant-the-do...
Clojure Plays Mario
I use gitolite as well, it's great. Currently working on integrating it into a CI/CD pipeline, which admittedly proves to be a slight challenge, but I'm sure I'll get there eventually.
We should not expect that some mistical fater figure or "they" will solve everything for us. Yes, we need to use the internet as there were hostile elements out there and without blind trust and blind fury that someone is not acting on our behalf all the time.

Some regulation is necessary for most serious or common matters but regulations are not a magic wand that will solve all of our problems without effort from the individual!
(I'm not saying this applies to you at all, but you made me think of it)

One thing EVE taught me is that some games provide more enjoyment the more you put into it. For me, I had to play 'hardcore' in EVE to really start to have fun - casual just didn't work and was never enjoyable.

At this point in my life I just don't want to invest the time and energy to enjoy EVE. I like hopping into a game and having fun immediately, versus having to work to have fun.
Anyone who questioned the covid vaccine because of 5G mind control factors was not rational.

Questioning the covid vaccine because it was not fully tested and the technology has had a history of issues was completely rational.
> How about the one where I agree with you that there are other massively wasteful energy activities out there but that fact is not an argument for tolerating them or allowing for more.

If you care so much about having less harm done to the ecosphere then why are you currently debating about "tiny slice of greenhouse gases" (Bitcoin) that other people arguably find very useful, instead of focusing on the "bigger portion of the emissions pie" (perpetual consumption of unnecessary new stuff in the post-modern consumerist society)?

I have a hard time believing you care more about the environment than about trying to blow the supposed evilness of Bitcoin out of proportion.

> Bitcoin is crazy wasteful compared with other financial tools which can do the same thing.

Good, which are these?

The one financial tool that somewhat comes close is gold, and because the latter implies orders of magnitude slower transfers than Bitcoin and because it's harder to secure and comes with a few more downsides on top it's still far from "same thing".
Of course this is in fact a total lie and reflects no truth in rality.
As uncool as they are, as a former minivan owner they are the most practical thing ever. From hauling kids to hitting home Depot for some DIY (with the rear seats removed), having two sliding doors and being able to swallow 4x8 sheets or a washing machine -they are hard to beat.
Another problem with using unicode in code is the handling of Unicode equivalence, compatibility, and normalization[1]. The same glyph can be produced in multiple ways. How is the reader, vim or emacs, and the compiler supposed to handle these cases?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode_equivalence
You can't be serious. Buy a plastic trashcan, use a generic metal scanner and an X-Ray and you are done.

If you are concerned about targeted attacks, head down to your local hardware store and buy one of the thousands they have in stock.
Emacs stands in stark contrast to this claim, though. Some things do get moved into native code so that it can run faster, but at large most of it is implemented in the same code and paths that everyone has access to at runtime.

(For examples of "to run faster," I'm talking of json and such. Calling out to the tree-sitter library is there, too. I'm not clear why that has to be native, oddly.)

I can certainly understand and agree with browsers having more locked down sections. For expert developer tools, though, it does feel a touch weirder.
Except for the syntax which is a bit better imo, there's very little reason to use Kotlin over Java. Also it's very slow to compile, it's unnerving.
> learning to add numbers.

What does it mean to learn to add numbers? LLMs in general are not good at accurately portraying their own processes, and humans are equally bad at interpreting what LLMs do “under the hood”.

“To rationalize” means something like “to provide a reason (a rationale)” and I don’t think the current generation of models can do that.
This commenter understands how contracts work.

I'll direct all the righteously indignant folks claiming "corruption" to you from now on. XD
Analysis on what happens when a submarine implodes
Would this solve the iOS 0 click exploits?

I imagine once Pegasus is on your phone, its too late.
I'd say it entirely depends on what stuff you're looking for. I'd pass on something like a Denali because the electronics and added trim pieces seem to be the most unreliable parts. The powertrain will be fine.

If anything my personal preference would be a mid-trimmed spec that skips things like a HUD, self driving, and leather trimmed door panels. Forward collision detection, a great sound system, and a platform that's mechanically dependable is my go-to.
I cancelled Prime and got Walmart+. They have all the same cheap crap Amazon does plus grocery delivery.
They are not. Low is relative! Where a big company charges you 300,000K/year, I will charge you 30K and I have 10 of you, so still a win for me :-)
I remember playing Planetarion[0] in 2000/2001. Amazingly, it's still going!

[0] https://www.planetarion.com
The Sherman tank is shorter front to back than the current F-150.
My initial post (maybe you did not see it) was about why other retailers don't make compelling affiliate programs.
Hasn’t long distance communications pretty much always been this way? The US Postal Service, Western Union telegraph networks, the Bell telephone system, ICQ, AOL Instant Messenger and many others were closed communication systems and services that relied on a single entity. Open communication protocols like email and cellular text messaging are the exception rather than the norm.

There is really nothing new or ground breaking about what WhatsApp does, it’s just newer shinier ICQ.
It depends on the activation functions. Some may never be able to compute addition.
No, including profit it costs peopably somewhere around 200k for a run of 5 trash cans.
A Conversation with Meredith Whittaker, President of Signal
Still weird that they could not identify it. I often listen to recordings where I am an unique likely listener for years, as well as my own bootlegs. But it is never a problem to identify music or even find much more knowledgeable people to ask for pointers.